<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_27_1849207</id>
	<title>Apple's "iPad" Out In the Open</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1264618140000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Reader oxide7 is one of the many to note that the heaviest speculation is mostly over (still waiting on the price, though) about Apple's anticipated new device (though there are surely plenty of questions about the device's hardware capabilities and the scope of its software and content marketplace): <i>"At an event in San Francisco Apple <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20100127/an-event-san-francisco-apple-released-its-anticipated-ipad.htm">released its anticipated iPad</a>.'[It's] Way better than a laptop, way better then a phone. You can turn it any way you want. To see the whole page is phenomenal,' said Jobs."</i> The (0.5") skinny:  1.5 lbs, multitouch, up to 64GB of flash, 9.7" screen, and a 1Ghz "Apple A4" chip (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/27/ipad-powered-by-custom-1ghz-apple-a4-chip/">more about the A4</a> in Engadget's developing story). The iPad is closer in concept to an expanded iPhone (OS and all) than a miniaturized laptop, though it doesn't have quite as much connectivity as you might expect, with no 3G connection built in. (You'll have to make do with 802.11n, Bluetooth, and tethering.)  <a href="http://live.gdgt.com/2010/01/27/live-apple-come-see-our-latest-creation-tablet-event-coverage/">Live coverage is ongoing at gdgt live</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/27/live-from-the-apple-tablet-latest-creation-event/?sort=newest&amp;refresh=30">Engadget</a>, <a href="http://live.gizmodo.com/">and Gizmodo</a>, as well as various others. <strong>Update by timothy, 19:58 GMT:</strong> Got the 3G part wrong; 3G is indeed an option. Prices run from $499 (16GB flash, WiFi but no 3G) to $829 (WiFi and 3G, 64GB flash). Should start shipping in 60 days (WiFi only), in 90 days for 3G. Surprsingly, no built-in camera.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reader oxide7 is one of the many to note that the heaviest speculation is mostly over ( still waiting on the price , though ) about Apple 's anticipated new device ( though there are surely plenty of questions about the device 's hardware capabilities and the scope of its software and content marketplace ) : " At an event in San Francisco Apple released its anticipated iPad .
' [ It 's ] Way better than a laptop , way better then a phone .
You can turn it any way you want .
To see the whole page is phenomenal, ' said Jobs .
" The ( 0.5 " ) skinny : 1.5 lbs , multitouch , up to 64GB of flash , 9.7 " screen , and a 1Ghz " Apple A4 " chip ( more about the A4 in Engadget 's developing story ) .
The iPad is closer in concept to an expanded iPhone ( OS and all ) than a miniaturized laptop , though it does n't have quite as much connectivity as you might expect , with no 3G connection built in .
( You 'll have to make do with 802.11n , Bluetooth , and tethering .
) Live coverage is ongoing at gdgt live , Engadget , and Gizmodo , as well as various others .
Update by timothy , 19 : 58 GMT : Got the 3G part wrong ; 3G is indeed an option .
Prices run from $ 499 ( 16GB flash , WiFi but no 3G ) to $ 829 ( WiFi and 3G , 64GB flash ) .
Should start shipping in 60 days ( WiFi only ) , in 90 days for 3G .
Surprsingly , no built-in camera .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reader oxide7 is one of the many to note that the heaviest speculation is mostly over (still waiting on the price, though) about Apple's anticipated new device (though there are surely plenty of questions about the device's hardware capabilities and the scope of its software and content marketplace): "At an event in San Francisco Apple released its anticipated iPad.
'[It's] Way better than a laptop, way better then a phone.
You can turn it any way you want.
To see the whole page is phenomenal,' said Jobs.
" The (0.5") skinny:  1.5 lbs, multitouch, up to 64GB of flash, 9.7" screen, and a 1Ghz "Apple A4" chip (more about the A4 in Engadget's developing story).
The iPad is closer in concept to an expanded iPhone (OS and all) than a miniaturized laptop, though it doesn't have quite as much connectivity as you might expect, with no 3G connection built in.
(You'll have to make do with 802.11n, Bluetooth, and tethering.
)  Live coverage is ongoing at gdgt live, Engadget, and Gizmodo, as well as various others.
Update by timothy, 19:58 GMT: Got the 3G part wrong; 3G is indeed an option.
Prices run from $499 (16GB flash, WiFi but no 3G) to $829 (WiFi and 3G, 64GB flash).
Should start shipping in 60 days (WiFi only), in 90 days for 3G.
Surprsingly, no built-in camera.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921840</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't Create a Need</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1264623180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It provides the potential of watching movies, reading, etc on a very convenient platform.  What it does not do it run Flash or Silver-light. This means that unless Apple is going to open up a streaming service that is as convenient and comprehensive as Hulu or Netflix, it is only about 1/2 of the machine it could be.  Not disrespect, but Youtube has almost nothing on it I find compelling enough to own any machine.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It provides the potential of watching movies , reading , etc on a very convenient platform .
What it does not do it run Flash or Silver-light .
This means that unless Apple is going to open up a streaming service that is as convenient and comprehensive as Hulu or Netflix , it is only about 1/2 of the machine it could be .
Not disrespect , but Youtube has almost nothing on it I find compelling enough to own any machine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It provides the potential of watching movies, reading, etc on a very convenient platform.
What it does not do it run Flash or Silver-light.
This means that unless Apple is going to open up a streaming service that is as convenient and comprehensive as Hulu or Netflix, it is only about 1/2 of the machine it could be.
Not disrespect, but Youtube has almost nothing on it I find compelling enough to own any machine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926930</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>bdleonard</author>
	<datestamp>1264593960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Next up, the iPon<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Next up , the iPon .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next up, the iPon ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925124</id>
	<title>Re:Mac system requirements</title>
	<author>itsdapead</author>
	<datestamp>1264588380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>this thing requires OS X 10.5.8 to sync to a Mac, but WinXP is okay for a PC. [snip] can anyone explain why Apple would alienate all their own OS X 10.4 users?</p></div><p>Because a big enough proportion of Mac users have upgraded from your 2005 version of Apple's OS to make it economical for them to drop support.
</p><p>Meanwhile, Microsoft has had a rather well-publicized spot of bother tearing the 2001 version of their OS from the cold, dead hands of their users - so dropping support for XP would potentially alienate more PC users than there are users of <i>any</i> Apple OS.
</p><p>In other news, Steve doesn't love you anymore because he hasn't heard from your wallet in 3 years.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>this thing requires OS X 10.5.8 to sync to a Mac , but WinXP is okay for a PC .
[ snip ] can anyone explain why Apple would alienate all their own OS X 10.4 users ? Because a big enough proportion of Mac users have upgraded from your 2005 version of Apple 's OS to make it economical for them to drop support .
Meanwhile , Microsoft has had a rather well-publicized spot of bother tearing the 2001 version of their OS from the cold , dead hands of their users - so dropping support for XP would potentially alienate more PC users than there are users of any Apple OS .
In other news , Steve does n't love you anymore because he has n't heard from your wallet in 3 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this thing requires OS X 10.5.8 to sync to a Mac, but WinXP is okay for a PC.
[snip] can anyone explain why Apple would alienate all their own OS X 10.4 users?Because a big enough proportion of Mac users have upgraded from your 2005 version of Apple's OS to make it economical for them to drop support.
Meanwhile, Microsoft has had a rather well-publicized spot of bother tearing the 2001 version of their OS from the cold, dead hands of their users - so dropping support for XP would potentially alienate more PC users than there are users of any Apple OS.
In other news, Steve doesn't love you anymore because he hasn't heard from your wallet in 3 years.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</id>
	<title>iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>What an unfortunate name. One could conceiveably think that Apple is delving into the untapped market of network-enabled feminine hygiene products... What was wrong with the oft-rumored "iSlate" moniker? Also, what's the PRICE on this thing?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What an unfortunate name .
One could conceiveably think that Apple is delving into the untapped market of network-enabled feminine hygiene products... What was wrong with the oft-rumored " iSlate " moniker ?
Also , what 's the PRICE on this thing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What an unfortunate name.
One could conceiveably think that Apple is delving into the untapped market of network-enabled feminine hygiene products... What was wrong with the oft-rumored "iSlate" moniker?
Also, what's the PRICE on this thing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921638</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't Create a Need</title>
	<author>ShadowRangerRIT</author>
	<datestamp>1264622700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given that the Kindle's target market is book readers, I don't think tablets like this will have much effect. It's more of a laptop replacement than a book reader; eInk is way more readable, and requires charging far less often. Yes, multiple single-purpose devices can get bulky, but then, I was already carrying around my books anyway. If I wanted a laptop, I'd look at the iPad as an alternative (just like I'd look at a netbook), but if I want to read books and newspapers, I'll stick with paper or eInk.</p><p>I'm not saying it will fail, I'm saying it will take market share from laptops far more than eBook readers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that the Kindle 's target market is book readers , I do n't think tablets like this will have much effect .
It 's more of a laptop replacement than a book reader ; eInk is way more readable , and requires charging far less often .
Yes , multiple single-purpose devices can get bulky , but then , I was already carrying around my books anyway .
If I wanted a laptop , I 'd look at the iPad as an alternative ( just like I 'd look at a netbook ) , but if I want to read books and newspapers , I 'll stick with paper or eInk.I 'm not saying it will fail , I 'm saying it will take market share from laptops far more than eBook readers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given that the Kindle's target market is book readers, I don't think tablets like this will have much effect.
It's more of a laptop replacement than a book reader; eInk is way more readable, and requires charging far less often.
Yes, multiple single-purpose devices can get bulky, but then, I was already carrying around my books anyway.
If I wanted a laptop, I'd look at the iPad as an alternative (just like I'd look at a netbook), but if I want to read books and newspapers, I'll stick with paper or eInk.I'm not saying it will fail, I'm saying it will take market share from laptops far more than eBook readers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922882</id>
	<title>Re:Compared to netbooks</title>
	<author>Sinning</author>
	<datestamp>1264625400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It also doesn't play Crysis.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It also does n't play Crysis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It also doesn't play Crysis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923956</id>
	<title>GOOD; I hate flash!</title>
	<author>bussdriver</author>
	<datestamp>1264584900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Flash was a nice vector animation format that turned into a backdoor for everything JAVA Applets were not and the pain and poor integration of all the video plug-ins.  Sure, the others helped make the need but Flash turned into a bloated security hole, browser crasher, and privacy problem.</p><p>HTML 5 and SVG will help to fix this.</p><p>Video shouldn't require a messy container kludge to run or a virtual machine. Have you ever noticed how much CPU flash kills trying to playback video that should hardly phase the system?</p><p>Why support Flash just for its lame video support?  The real reason we use it is because everybody has the plug in already and we can save bandwidth by hosting video elsewhere for free while creating a larger exposure to the net... (you tube, the 2nd largest search engine.)</p><p>Youtube is going to html5 + h.264- the rest will follow; flash served its good, it can die soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Flash was a nice vector animation format that turned into a backdoor for everything JAVA Applets were not and the pain and poor integration of all the video plug-ins .
Sure , the others helped make the need but Flash turned into a bloated security hole , browser crasher , and privacy problem.HTML 5 and SVG will help to fix this.Video should n't require a messy container kludge to run or a virtual machine .
Have you ever noticed how much CPU flash kills trying to playback video that should hardly phase the system ? Why support Flash just for its lame video support ?
The real reason we use it is because everybody has the plug in already and we can save bandwidth by hosting video elsewhere for free while creating a larger exposure to the net... ( you tube , the 2nd largest search engine .
) Youtube is going to html5 + h.264- the rest will follow ; flash served its good , it can die soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flash was a nice vector animation format that turned into a backdoor for everything JAVA Applets were not and the pain and poor integration of all the video plug-ins.
Sure, the others helped make the need but Flash turned into a bloated security hole, browser crasher, and privacy problem.HTML 5 and SVG will help to fix this.Video shouldn't require a messy container kludge to run or a virtual machine.
Have you ever noticed how much CPU flash kills trying to playback video that should hardly phase the system?Why support Flash just for its lame video support?
The real reason we use it is because everybody has the plug in already and we can save bandwidth by hosting video elsewhere for free while creating a larger exposure to the net... (you tube, the 2nd largest search engine.
)Youtube is going to html5 + h.264- the rest will follow; flash served its good, it can die soon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924702</id>
	<title>iLike iPad</title>
	<author>zebpack</author>
	<datestamp>1264587060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> iWill iGnite iPhone iN iRk iNduced iNside iPad</htmltext>
<tokenext>iWill iGnite iPhone iN iRk iNduced iNside iPad</tokentext>
<sentencetext> iWill iGnite iPhone iN iRk iNduced iNside iPad</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929052</id>
	<title>Re:With that weak processor?</title>
	<author>quenda</author>
	<datestamp>1264607580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hey, if it's running on ARM, you can stick linux on it.</p></div><p>I can run Linux on my iTouch!?<br>I wish. Its real Unix inside, so you can port command-line apps. to a jailbroken model, but no X-windows.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , if it 's running on ARM , you can stick linux on it.I can run Linux on my iTouch !
? I wish .
Its real Unix inside , so you can port command-line apps .
to a jailbroken model , but no X-windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, if it's running on ARM, you can stick linux on it.I can run Linux on my iTouch!
?I wish.
Its real Unix inside, so you can port command-line apps.
to a jailbroken model, but no X-windows.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921290</id>
	<title>The Chinese</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chinese junk for uneducated American consumers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chinese junk for uneducated American consumers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chinese junk for uneducated American consumers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923700</id>
	<title>Re:3G Data Plans</title>
	<author>Yhippa</author>
	<datestamp>1264584240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This makes me iSad because I already pay about $60/mo. for FiOS internet.  $29.99 is a great deal but that's just too much money on top of what I'm paying.  And what's up with the 250 MB for $15?  Who would really use that?  The average user would probably use that up in two days.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This makes me iSad because I already pay about $ 60/mo .
for FiOS internet .
$ 29.99 is a great deal but that 's just too much money on top of what I 'm paying .
And what 's up with the 250 MB for $ 15 ?
Who would really use that ?
The average user would probably use that up in two days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This makes me iSad because I already pay about $60/mo.
for FiOS internet.
$29.99 is a great deal but that's just too much money on top of what I'm paying.
And what's up with the 250 MB for $15?
Who would really use that?
The average user would probably use that up in two days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926018</id>
	<title>Apple Announces new iShackle (tm) !</title>
	<author>Jeremy Allison - Sam</author>
	<datestamp>1264591020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dateline: Wed Jan 27th 2010, San Francisco: 10:00am</p><p>Not since their release of the iWaterboard "enhanced interrogation"<br>playset (tm) has so much excitement been generated over a new Apple<br>product. The new iShackle (tm), demonstrated by Steve Jobs on an<br>anti-DRM protester on stage at a packed San Francisco event this<br>morning, takes customer lock-in to a new level. "With the new iShackle<br>(tm), content companies will literally OWN their customers", said Jobs<br>in front of an ecstatic audience. "No more pesky choice, no more<br>confusing options, just pure, simple, buy this or ELSE corporate power". As<br>expected, fans were completely delighted with the new Apple product.<br>"I can't wait to buy the new iShackle (tm) and take it home and put it<br>on !" said one excited member of the crowd. "Steve says I never have<br>to take it off or think about other products EVER AGAIN !"</p><p>Not everyone was pleased with the announcement however. A Microsoft<br>spokesperson said, "We've had the Microsoft zOBEY software for 2 years<br>now, this isn't a new concept. Apple once again copies the market<br>leader." Sales of the Microsoft alternative have been poor however,<br>except for Microsoft employees, who have had use of the software<br>mandated in their employment contracts since Steve Ballmer announced<br>the product at a marketing event in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba in 2007.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dateline : Wed Jan 27th 2010 , San Francisco : 10 : 00amNot since their release of the iWaterboard " enhanced interrogation " playset ( tm ) has so much excitement been generated over a new Appleproduct .
The new iShackle ( tm ) , demonstrated by Steve Jobs on ananti-DRM protester on stage at a packed San Francisco event thismorning , takes customer lock-in to a new level .
" With the new iShackle ( tm ) , content companies will literally OWN their customers " , said Jobsin front of an ecstatic audience .
" No more pesky choice , no moreconfusing options , just pure , simple , buy this or ELSE corporate power " .
Asexpected , fans were completely delighted with the new Apple product .
" I ca n't wait to buy the new iShackle ( tm ) and take it home and put iton !
" said one excited member of the crowd .
" Steve says I never haveto take it off or think about other products EVER AGAIN !
" Not everyone was pleased with the announcement however .
A Microsoftspokesperson said , " We 've had the Microsoft zOBEY software for 2 yearsnow , this is n't a new concept .
Apple once again copies the marketleader .
" Sales of the Microsoft alternative have been poor however,except for Microsoft employees , who have had use of the softwaremandated in their employment contracts since Steve Ballmer announcedthe product at a marketing event in Guantanamo Bay , Cuba in 2007 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dateline: Wed Jan 27th 2010, San Francisco: 10:00amNot since their release of the iWaterboard "enhanced interrogation"playset (tm) has so much excitement been generated over a new Appleproduct.
The new iShackle (tm), demonstrated by Steve Jobs on ananti-DRM protester on stage at a packed San Francisco event thismorning, takes customer lock-in to a new level.
"With the new iShackle(tm), content companies will literally OWN their customers", said Jobsin front of an ecstatic audience.
"No more pesky choice, no moreconfusing options, just pure, simple, buy this or ELSE corporate power".
Asexpected, fans were completely delighted with the new Apple product.
"I can't wait to buy the new iShackle (tm) and take it home and put iton !
" said one excited member of the crowd.
"Steve says I never haveto take it off or think about other products EVER AGAIN !
"Not everyone was pleased with the announcement however.
A Microsoftspokesperson said, "We've had the Microsoft zOBEY software for 2 yearsnow, this isn't a new concept.
Apple once again copies the marketleader.
" Sales of the Microsoft alternative have been poor however,except for Microsoft employees, who have had use of the softwaremandated in their employment contracts since Steve Ballmer announcedthe product at a marketing event in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba in 2007.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921826</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264623180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most netbooks have multitask OSs installed.  This is worse on that count, too.</p><p>Even Slashdot's servers think so: CATPCHA for this post is <em>capable</em>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most netbooks have multitask OSs installed .
This is worse on that count , too.Even Slashdot 's servers think so : CATPCHA for this post is capable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most netbooks have multitask OSs installed.
This is worse on that count, too.Even Slashdot's servers think so: CATPCHA for this post is capable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928428</id>
	<title>max altitude</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264602240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>10,000 feet. <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/#envrequirements" title="apple.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/#envrequirements</a> [apple.com]</p><p>Can't use this on planes?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>10,000 feet .
http : //www.apple.com/ipad/specs/ # envrequirements [ apple.com ] Ca n't use this on planes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10,000 feet.
http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/#envrequirements [apple.com]Can't use this on planes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1264622220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you can free TV shows and movies streaming over Flash, why buy them on iTunes?</p><p>I don't expect Flash on this or the iPhone anytime soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you can free TV shows and movies streaming over Flash , why buy them on iTunes ? I do n't expect Flash on this or the iPhone anytime soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can free TV shows and movies streaming over Flash, why buy them on iTunes?I don't expect Flash on this or the iPhone anytime soon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924224</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig</title>
	<author>Sandbags</author>
	<datestamp>1264585680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What?  WiFi N built in, 3G optional, tethers as well.</p><p>No, 16GB for the base model is not a lot, but 64GB is fine (especially since you'll stream most video in your home), and the 64GB model is $100 less than the low estimates that were given for the starting price estimate just yesterday...</p><p>You're getting 64GB for $699 if you have an iPhone and $830 if not and you need 3G.  NO CONTRACT REQUIREMENT for the 3g as well and only $29/month (prepaid terms).  Just yesterday everyone assumes $899 - 1000.  You're complaining that you got what you expected for less money?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
WiFi N built in , 3G optional , tethers as well.No , 16GB for the base model is not a lot , but 64GB is fine ( especially since you 'll stream most video in your home ) , and the 64GB model is $ 100 less than the low estimates that were given for the starting price estimate just yesterday...You 're getting 64GB for $ 699 if you have an iPhone and $ 830 if not and you need 3G .
NO CONTRACT REQUIREMENT for the 3g as well and only $ 29/month ( prepaid terms ) .
Just yesterday everyone assumes $ 899 - 1000 .
You 're complaining that you got what you expected for less money ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
WiFi N built in, 3G optional, tethers as well.No, 16GB for the base model is not a lot, but 64GB is fine (especially since you'll stream most video in your home), and the 64GB model is $100 less than the low estimates that were given for the starting price estimate just yesterday...You're getting 64GB for $699 if you have an iPhone and $830 if not and you need 3G.
NO CONTRACT REQUIREMENT for the 3g as well and only $29/month (prepaid terms).
Just yesterday everyone assumes $899 - 1000.
You're complaining that you got what you expected for less money?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923692</id>
	<title>iPad?</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1264584240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What, is this along the lines of, "I was going to drive over to my girlfriend's house, but I lost my <i>khakis</i>?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What , is this along the lines of , " I was going to drive over to my girlfriend 's house , but I lost my khakis ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, is this along the lines of, "I was going to drive over to my girlfriend's house, but I lost my khakis?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925766</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't Create a Need</title>
	<author>Mr. Flibble</author>
	<datestamp>1264590240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Given that the Kindle's target market is book readers, I don't think tablets like this will have much effect. It's more of a laptop replacement than a book reader; eInk is way more readable, and requires charging far less often. Yes, multiple single-purpose devices can get bulky, but then, I was already carrying around my books anyway. If I wanted a laptop, I'd look at the iPad as an alternative (just like I'd look at a netbook), but if I want to read books and newspapers, I'll stick with paper or eInk.</p><p>I'm not saying it will fail, I'm saying it will take market share from laptops far more than eBook readers.</p></div><p>I am not so sure about this. I see eBook readers often on the plane. I remember going around with an MP3 Player, Cell phone and Palm pilot, and wishing that these things could all be combined into one device. I disliked carrying multiple devices. On many levels, my Palm Pilot was better than a iPhone for business tasks - but the iPhone integrates all those 3 features well so I don't have to carry all 3 devices (I actually use a work supplied blackberry curve, but I digress).</p><p>The iPad removes the need for a kindle+netbook+itouch, just like the iphone eliminated the need for carrying 3 devices, in a similar way, this combines features in the niche. It does not remove the laptop requirement. As an ebook reader it is "good enough" for most people. And that is all that most non-geeks want. They just care that it looks cool so they can be seen with the device and not look geeky. That the interface of the device is dead-simple to use, so they don't have to spend time trying to learn it (that is what geeks like to do).</p><p>The iPad is not the best at the things that it does - the iPhone is not the best at the things that it does - they are all just "good enough" but at the same time just easy enough to use. And that is the secret that Apple is REALLY offering with these devices - "easy enough to use".</p><p>This is why Commander Taco's infamous "no wireless, less space than a nomad, lame" comment is funny. The iPod took off mainly because it was the easiest MP3 player to use for most people. The secret weapon is the ease of use.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that the Kindle 's target market is book readers , I do n't think tablets like this will have much effect .
It 's more of a laptop replacement than a book reader ; eInk is way more readable , and requires charging far less often .
Yes , multiple single-purpose devices can get bulky , but then , I was already carrying around my books anyway .
If I wanted a laptop , I 'd look at the iPad as an alternative ( just like I 'd look at a netbook ) , but if I want to read books and newspapers , I 'll stick with paper or eInk.I 'm not saying it will fail , I 'm saying it will take market share from laptops far more than eBook readers.I am not so sure about this .
I see eBook readers often on the plane .
I remember going around with an MP3 Player , Cell phone and Palm pilot , and wishing that these things could all be combined into one device .
I disliked carrying multiple devices .
On many levels , my Palm Pilot was better than a iPhone for business tasks - but the iPhone integrates all those 3 features well so I do n't have to carry all 3 devices ( I actually use a work supplied blackberry curve , but I digress ) .The iPad removes the need for a kindle + netbook + itouch , just like the iphone eliminated the need for carrying 3 devices , in a similar way , this combines features in the niche .
It does not remove the laptop requirement .
As an ebook reader it is " good enough " for most people .
And that is all that most non-geeks want .
They just care that it looks cool so they can be seen with the device and not look geeky .
That the interface of the device is dead-simple to use , so they do n't have to spend time trying to learn it ( that is what geeks like to do ) .The iPad is not the best at the things that it does - the iPhone is not the best at the things that it does - they are all just " good enough " but at the same time just easy enough to use .
And that is the secret that Apple is REALLY offering with these devices - " easy enough to use " .This is why Commander Taco 's infamous " no wireless , less space than a nomad , lame " comment is funny .
The iPod took off mainly because it was the easiest MP3 player to use for most people .
The secret weapon is the ease of use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given that the Kindle's target market is book readers, I don't think tablets like this will have much effect.
It's more of a laptop replacement than a book reader; eInk is way more readable, and requires charging far less often.
Yes, multiple single-purpose devices can get bulky, but then, I was already carrying around my books anyway.
If I wanted a laptop, I'd look at the iPad as an alternative (just like I'd look at a netbook), but if I want to read books and newspapers, I'll stick with paper or eInk.I'm not saying it will fail, I'm saying it will take market share from laptops far more than eBook readers.I am not so sure about this.
I see eBook readers often on the plane.
I remember going around with an MP3 Player, Cell phone and Palm pilot, and wishing that these things could all be combined into one device.
I disliked carrying multiple devices.
On many levels, my Palm Pilot was better than a iPhone for business tasks - but the iPhone integrates all those 3 features well so I don't have to carry all 3 devices (I actually use a work supplied blackberry curve, but I digress).The iPad removes the need for a kindle+netbook+itouch, just like the iphone eliminated the need for carrying 3 devices, in a similar way, this combines features in the niche.
It does not remove the laptop requirement.
As an ebook reader it is "good enough" for most people.
And that is all that most non-geeks want.
They just care that it looks cool so they can be seen with the device and not look geeky.
That the interface of the device is dead-simple to use, so they don't have to spend time trying to learn it (that is what geeks like to do).The iPad is not the best at the things that it does - the iPhone is not the best at the things that it does - they are all just "good enough" but at the same time just easy enough to use.
And that is the secret that Apple is REALLY offering with these devices - "easy enough to use".This is why Commander Taco's infamous "no wireless, less space than a nomad, lame" comment is funny.
The iPod took off mainly because it was the easiest MP3 player to use for most people.
The secret weapon is the ease of use.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926248</id>
	<title>Re:The iPad is a Platform</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1264591740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There have been a few times where I've seriously considered plunking down some cash and getting a Mac Mini to use as my primary desktop at home, for the sole reason of having a nice fluid well-engineered interface and set of tools for my increasing interest in web development.</p><p>But if this is the direction that OS X is headed down, I don't want any part of it. I suspect that Apple is trying to get to the point where the desktop version of OS X (as we know it) will eventually be available only to developers while the locked-down iPhone/iPod/iPad OS will be the standard on all of Apple's consumer-level hardware like laptops and desktops.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There have been a few times where I 've seriously considered plunking down some cash and getting a Mac Mini to use as my primary desktop at home , for the sole reason of having a nice fluid well-engineered interface and set of tools for my increasing interest in web development.But if this is the direction that OS X is headed down , I do n't want any part of it .
I suspect that Apple is trying to get to the point where the desktop version of OS X ( as we know it ) will eventually be available only to developers while the locked-down iPhone/iPod/iPad OS will be the standard on all of Apple 's consumer-level hardware like laptops and desktops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There have been a few times where I've seriously considered plunking down some cash and getting a Mac Mini to use as my primary desktop at home, for the sole reason of having a nice fluid well-engineered interface and set of tools for my increasing interest in web development.But if this is the direction that OS X is headed down, I don't want any part of it.
I suspect that Apple is trying to get to the point where the desktop version of OS X (as we know it) will eventually be available only to developers while the locked-down iPhone/iPod/iPad OS will be the standard on all of Apple's consumer-level hardware like laptops and desktops.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927074</id>
	<title>Re:underpowered?</title>
	<author>KnownIssues</author>
	<datestamp>1264594500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It actually has a robust power source; it is powered almost entirely by the user's sense of self-importance.</p></div><p>
Then mine's gonna go to 11.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It actually has a robust power source ; it is powered almost entirely by the user 's sense of self-importance .
Then mine 's gon na go to 11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It actually has a robust power source; it is powered almost entirely by the user's sense of self-importance.
Then mine's gonna go to 11.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921334</id>
	<title>Backlit and eyestrain</title>
	<author>jbezorg</author>
	<datestamp>1264622160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I may still get a Kindle because of this reason.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I may still get a Kindle because of this reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I may still get a Kindle because of this reason.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931666</id>
	<title>Re:Apple A4</title>
	<author>Tapewolf</author>
	<datestamp>1264682040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I  simply assumed it was a brain-damaged version of the Cortex A8...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I simply assumed it was a brain-damaged version of the Cortex A8.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I  simply assumed it was a brain-damaged version of the Cortex A8...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921950</id>
	<title>AT&amp;T!?!?!?!</title>
	<author>WiiVault</author>
	<datestamp>1264623360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>God tell me this is a bad dream. Cool HW, but WTF are they thinking?</htmltext>
<tokenext>God tell me this is a bad dream .
Cool HW , but WTF are they thinking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>God tell me this is a bad dream.
Cool HW, but WTF are they thinking?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921882</id>
	<title>WiFi or 3G</title>
	<author>Lectoid</author>
	<datestamp>1264623240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Spoke too soon. There are 3G models available.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Spoke too soon .
There are 3G models available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spoke too soon.
There are 3G models available.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922826</id>
	<title>Re:underpowered?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264625280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If that source fails, it falls back on the wireless connection and gains power from the perpetual internet rumors about the next apple product that will revolutionize the tech market and life as we know it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If that source fails , it falls back on the wireless connection and gains power from the perpetual internet rumors about the next apple product that will revolutionize the tech market and life as we know it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If that source fails, it falls back on the wireless connection and gains power from the perpetual internet rumors about the next apple product that will revolutionize the tech market and life as we know it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923038</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>black88</author>
	<datestamp>1264625880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck Flash.  Seriously.  HTML5 or DIE!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck Flash .
Seriously. HTML5 or DIE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck Flash.
Seriously.  HTML5 or DIE!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921430</id>
	<title>Compared to netbooks</title>
	<author>kovari</author>
	<datestamp>1264622280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slightly lighter, smaller screen, no proper keyboard, no expandable storage, less powerfull processor, similar battery life, no support for Beowulf clustering. Did I forget anything?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slightly lighter , smaller screen , no proper keyboard , no expandable storage , less powerfull processor , similar battery life , no support for Beowulf clustering .
Did I forget anything ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slightly lighter, smaller screen, no proper keyboard, no expandable storage, less powerfull processor, similar battery life, no support for Beowulf clustering.
Did I forget anything?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924678</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264587000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So help me god this thing better have multitasking</p></div><p>Oh don't worry... it doesn't.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So help me god this thing better have multitaskingOh do n't worry... it does n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So help me god this thing better have multitaskingOh don't worry... it doesn't.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922052</id>
	<title>IPad name already taken... ?</title>
	<author>Jasonv</author>
	<datestamp>1264623540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately, it seems MadTV has already claim to the name "iPAD"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsjU0K8QPhs" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsjU0K8QPhs</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , it seems MadTV has already claim to the name " iPAD " : ) http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = lsjU0K8QPhs [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, it seems MadTV has already claim to the name "iPAD" :)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsjU0K8QPhs [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924496</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>ArbitraryDescriptor</author>
	<datestamp>1264586520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More likely factors:<br>Having no means to control an internet full of Flash apps and games vs the App Store<br>Hulu, Netflix, and the like vs iTunes video.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More likely factors : Having no means to control an internet full of Flash apps and games vs the App StoreHulu , Netflix , and the like vs iTunes video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More likely factors:Having no means to control an internet full of Flash apps and games vs the App StoreHulu, Netflix, and the like vs iTunes video.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924636</id>
	<title>Re:The iPad is a Platform</title>
	<author>riffzifnab</author>
	<datestamp>1264586940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Right idea, wrong product.  You're thinking about a ChromeOS laptop.  It's the internet in your lap, it will just work and it will be fast.  It also wont cost $500 per device.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Right idea , wrong product .
You 're thinking about a ChromeOS laptop .
It 's the internet in your lap , it will just work and it will be fast .
It also wont cost $ 500 per device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right idea, wrong product.
You're thinking about a ChromeOS laptop.
It's the internet in your lap, it will just work and it will be fast.
It also wont cost $500 per device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924042</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't Create a Need</title>
	<author>emt377</author>
	<datestamp>1264585140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I could easily see myself having one of these in a stand on my night table as a fancy alarm clock.  I like to go make coffee and breakfast, then bring it back to bed with a laptop - to check the news, mail, ical (to see what meetings I have), and so forth.  Nothing I really need a whole laptop for.  The iPhone can do the same but is a bit small... I need glasses to read text on it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I could easily see myself having one of these in a stand on my night table as a fancy alarm clock .
I like to go make coffee and breakfast , then bring it back to bed with a laptop - to check the news , mail , ical ( to see what meetings I have ) , and so forth .
Nothing I really need a whole laptop for .
The iPhone can do the same but is a bit small... I need glasses to read text on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could easily see myself having one of these in a stand on my night table as a fancy alarm clock.
I like to go make coffee and breakfast, then bring it back to bed with a laptop - to check the news, mail, ical (to see what meetings I have), and so forth.
Nothing I really need a whole laptop for.
The iPhone can do the same but is a bit small... I need glasses to read text on it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924136</id>
	<title>Re:underpowered?</title>
	<author>S.O.B.</author>
	<datestamp>1264585440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There you have Apple's new marketing campaign slogan:</p><p>Self-importance - Powering Macs since 1984.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There you have Apple 's new marketing campaign slogan : Self-importance - Powering Macs since 1984 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There you have Apple's new marketing campaign slogan:Self-importance - Powering Macs since 1984.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922652</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>jonbryce</author>
	<datestamp>1264624920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can watch youtube because there is an app for it.  You can watch iPlayer and TVCatchup (from a UK IP address) because they provide h.264 as an alternative to flash video.  Otherwise, you probably can't watch it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can watch youtube because there is an app for it .
You can watch iPlayer and TVCatchup ( from a UK IP address ) because they provide h.264 as an alternative to flash video .
Otherwise , you probably ca n't watch it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can watch youtube because there is an app for it.
You can watch iPlayer and TVCatchup (from a UK IP address) because they provide h.264 as an alternative to flash video.
Otherwise, you probably can't watch it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922794</id>
	<title>Re:No 3g?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264625220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a wfi model and 3g+wifi model</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a wfi model and 3g + wifi model</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a wfi model and 3g+wifi model</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921942</id>
	<title>Re:Taking Jobs at his word</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1264623360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know you're joking, but it makes more sense in context.  He's saying that there's no point in creating a new class of devices unless it actually does something better than the existing classes of devices.  So if the iPad doesn't do *something* better than both the iPhone and MacBook, then they wouldn't be releasing it as a product.  That doesn't mean that Macbooks and iPhones won't continue to do other things better.
</p><p>So their hope is that the iPad will be better for reading ebooks (for example) than either the iPhone of MacBook, but the MacBook may still be better for general computing and the iPhone will be better at being a cell phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know you 're joking , but it makes more sense in context .
He 's saying that there 's no point in creating a new class of devices unless it actually does something better than the existing classes of devices .
So if the iPad does n't do * something * better than both the iPhone and MacBook , then they would n't be releasing it as a product .
That does n't mean that Macbooks and iPhones wo n't continue to do other things better .
So their hope is that the iPad will be better for reading ebooks ( for example ) than either the iPhone of MacBook , but the MacBook may still be better for general computing and the iPhone will be better at being a cell phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know you're joking, but it makes more sense in context.
He's saying that there's no point in creating a new class of devices unless it actually does something better than the existing classes of devices.
So if the iPad doesn't do *something* better than both the iPhone and MacBook, then they wouldn't be releasing it as a product.
That doesn't mean that Macbooks and iPhones won't continue to do other things better.
So their hope is that the iPad will be better for reading ebooks (for example) than either the iPhone of MacBook, but the MacBook may still be better for general computing and the iPhone will be better at being a cell phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922522</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>fieromerk</author>
	<datestamp>1264624620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Pricing will start at $499 for the 16-gigabyte version, $599 for the 32-gig version and $699 for the 64, Jobs said.

Having 3G mobile access will cost an extra $130 on each, he said."

From cnn.com (http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/01/27/apple.tablet/index.html?hpt=T1)</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Pricing will start at $ 499 for the 16-gigabyte version , $ 599 for the 32-gig version and $ 699 for the 64 , Jobs said .
Having 3G mobile access will cost an extra $ 130 on each , he said .
" From cnn.com ( http : //www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/01/27/apple.tablet/index.html ? hpt = T1 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Pricing will start at $499 for the 16-gigabyte version, $599 for the 32-gig version and $699 for the 64, Jobs said.
Having 3G mobile access will cost an extra $130 on each, he said.
"

From cnn.com (http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/01/27/apple.tablet/index.html?hpt=T1)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921796</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>TrippTDF</author>
	<datestamp>1264623060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wish I had mod points...  You nailed it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish I had mod points... You nailed it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish I had mod points...  You nailed it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30940026</id>
	<title>Apple A4 = 2010 Cyrix MediaGX???</title>
	<author>logicassasin</author>
	<datestamp>1264670100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... 'cause that's what it looks like to me. Low power CPU with integrated audio and video... But the MediaGX, which was used in the Casio Cassiopea Fiva tablet PC, was introduced in 1997 so this Apple A4 , conceptually, is a bit less than new.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... 'cause that 's what it looks like to me .
Low power CPU with integrated audio and video... But the MediaGX , which was used in the Casio Cassiopea Fiva tablet PC , was introduced in 1997 so this Apple A4 , conceptually , is a bit less than new .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... 'cause that's what it looks like to me.
Low power CPU with integrated audio and video... But the MediaGX, which was used in the Casio Cassiopea Fiva tablet PC, was introduced in 1997 so this Apple A4 , conceptually, is a bit less than new.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923052</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>C0vardeAn0nim0</author>
	<datestamp>1264625940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and recently, youtube is giving users of chrome and safari the option to stream h.264 directly to the browser if you sig nfor their HTML5 beta.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and recently , youtube is giving users of chrome and safari the option to stream h.264 directly to the browser if you sig nfor their HTML5 beta .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and recently, youtube is giving users of chrome and safari the option to stream h.264 directly to the browser if you sig nfor their HTML5 beta.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922392</id>
	<title>iSingularity</title>
	<author>Singularity42</author>
	<datestamp>1264624320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Singularity (moving, not copying) to machines won't have all these SKUs.  Wait for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Singularity ( moving , not copying ) to machines wo n't have all these SKUs .
Wait for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Singularity (moving, not copying) to machines won't have all these SKUs.
Wait for it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924760</id>
	<title>Re:The iPad is a Platform</title>
	<author>proslack</author>
	<datestamp>1264587240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Joe and Jane Average aren't even going to know it exists. Joe Techie and Jane Hipster might.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Joe and Jane Average are n't even going to know it exists .
Joe Techie and Jane Hipster might .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Joe and Jane Average aren't even going to know it exists.
Joe Techie and Jane Hipster might.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925398</id>
	<title>Re:Awkward keyboard usage</title>
	<author>dorre</author>
	<datestamp>1264589280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To be honest there's potential that apple might have struck gold again.<br>
<br>
This is device for information consumption! This is what it was designed for and this is what most will use it for. Media/web/tvshows.<br>
<br>
It makes sense to compare it to the iPhone in the perspective that the iPhone is pretty lousy phone, but a very smart platform for having information available 'at a touch of your fingertip (or other bodily part)'. In this sense the iPad probably outperforms the iPhone.<br>
<br>
And personally i think surfing with a touchscreen is one of the nicest ways of surfing. It's very intuitive. Take this concept and make it work on a 10" device and at least you've got yourself a good gamble.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To be honest there 's potential that apple might have struck gold again .
This is device for information consumption !
This is what it was designed for and this is what most will use it for .
Media/web/tvshows . It makes sense to compare it to the iPhone in the perspective that the iPhone is pretty lousy phone , but a very smart platform for having information available 'at a touch of your fingertip ( or other bodily part ) ' .
In this sense the iPad probably outperforms the iPhone .
And personally i think surfing with a touchscreen is one of the nicest ways of surfing .
It 's very intuitive .
Take this concept and make it work on a 10 " device and at least you 've got yourself a good gamble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be honest there's potential that apple might have struck gold again.
This is device for information consumption!
This is what it was designed for and this is what most will use it for.
Media/web/tvshows.

It makes sense to compare it to the iPhone in the perspective that the iPhone is pretty lousy phone, but a very smart platform for having information available 'at a touch of your fingertip (or other bodily part)'.
In this sense the iPad probably outperforms the iPhone.
And personally i think surfing with a touchscreen is one of the nicest ways of surfing.
It's very intuitive.
Take this concept and make it work on a 10" device and at least you've got yourself a good gamble.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921808</id>
	<title>Re:Phenomenal</title>
	<author>chentiangemalc</author>
	<datestamp>1264623120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>i have a couple of books around me - guess what? i can turn them anyway I want as well, AND see the whole page at the same time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>i have a couple of books around me - guess what ?
i can turn them anyway I want as well , AND see the whole page at the same time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i have a couple of books around me - guess what?
i can turn them anyway I want as well, AND see the whole page at the same time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922556</id>
	<title>Apple spec site is up</title>
	<author>Singularity42</author>
	<datestamp>1264624680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/" title="apple.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/ipad/</a> [apple.com]</p><p>--</p><p>I wasn't seeing this on the main apple page.  Store hasn't been down today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.apple.com/ipad/ [ apple.com ] --I was n't seeing this on the main apple page .
Store has n't been down today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.apple.com/ipad/ [apple.com]--I wasn't seeing this on the main apple page.
Store hasn't been down today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922636</id>
	<title>it has 3G</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.apple.com/ipad/pricing/  Expensive as hell</p><p>SimonTek</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.apple.com/ipad/pricing/ Expensive as hellSimonTek</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.apple.com/ipad/pricing/  Expensive as hellSimonTek</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921754</id>
	<title>Yay?</title>
	<author>brianmat</author>
	<datestamp>1264622940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unless this comes in around the cost of a regular netbook (~$320 USD) then I don't really see the point.
<br> <br>
Netbook:
<br>
Flash: Yes<br>
Replaceable battery: Yes<br>
Touchscreen: No (for the most part)<br>
Real keyboard: Yes<br>
Bluetooth: Yes<br>
Tether: Yes<br>
<br>
Unless you have a dying need for a 10" touchscreen and the ability to blow up an iPhone application to super pixel size then I really don't see the market.  You could argue it as an ebook reader, but the price points they have set in place make the Nook, Kindle, and others look a bit more appealing from the $9.99 and under book list.

Overall, I give it a 9.5/10 on the "solution looking for a problem" scale.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless this comes in around the cost of a regular netbook ( ~ $ 320 USD ) then I do n't really see the point .
Netbook : Flash : Yes Replaceable battery : Yes Touchscreen : No ( for the most part ) Real keyboard : Yes Bluetooth : Yes Tether : Yes Unless you have a dying need for a 10 " touchscreen and the ability to blow up an iPhone application to super pixel size then I really do n't see the market .
You could argue it as an ebook reader , but the price points they have set in place make the Nook , Kindle , and others look a bit more appealing from the $ 9.99 and under book list .
Overall , I give it a 9.5/10 on the " solution looking for a problem " scale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless this comes in around the cost of a regular netbook (~$320 USD) then I don't really see the point.
Netbook:

Flash: Yes
Replaceable battery: Yes
Touchscreen: No (for the most part)
Real keyboard: Yes
Bluetooth: Yes
Tether: Yes

Unless you have a dying need for a 10" touchscreen and the ability to blow up an iPhone application to super pixel size then I really don't see the market.
You could argue it as an ebook reader, but the price points they have set in place make the Nook, Kindle, and others look a bit more appealing from the $9.99 and under book list.
Overall, I give it a 9.5/10 on the "solution looking for a problem" scale.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924358</id>
	<title>I feel a great disturbance in the force...</title>
	<author>RockClimbingFool</author>
	<datestamp>1264586100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...as if millions of iSheep gizzed their pants when Steve Jobs showed them they could see a whole webpage at once!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...as if millions of iSheep gizzed their pants when Steve Jobs showed them they could see a whole webpage at once ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...as if millions of iSheep gizzed their pants when Steve Jobs showed them they could see a whole webpage at once!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926632</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>flynt</author>
	<datestamp>1264592940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's funny enough that as of my posting, the menu immediately to the right of your linked picture contains an image of Jobs holding an iPad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's funny enough that as of my posting , the menu immediately to the right of your linked picture contains an image of Jobs holding an iPad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's funny enough that as of my posting, the menu immediately to the right of your linked picture contains an image of Jobs holding an iPad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925554</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264589700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It supports any standard Bluetooth keyboard.<br>You indeed can't use a mouse with the iPad (by design. maybe an app / jailbreaking will change that).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It supports any standard Bluetooth keyboard.You indeed ca n't use a mouse with the iPad ( by design .
maybe an app / jailbreaking will change that ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It supports any standard Bluetooth keyboard.You indeed can't use a mouse with the iPad (by design.
maybe an app / jailbreaking will change that).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925040</id>
	<title>iPad's impact on mobile computing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264588140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that the iPad is a welcome newcomer to the world of mobile computing. I don't have the room to explain here, but check out this webpage for a more indepth look at its impact on mobile computing: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2638829/apples\_new\_device\_the\_ipad.html?cat=15</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that the iPad is a welcome newcomer to the world of mobile computing .
I do n't have the room to explain here , but check out this webpage for a more indepth look at its impact on mobile computing : http : //www.associatedcontent.com/article/2638829/apples \ _new \ _device \ _the \ _ipad.html ? cat = 15</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that the iPad is a welcome newcomer to the world of mobile computing.
I don't have the room to explain here, but check out this webpage for a more indepth look at its impact on mobile computing: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2638829/apples\_new\_device\_the\_ipad.html?cat=15</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926658</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264593060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>wannabe geek and fashion victim.</p></div><p>Internally at Apple it's less words to simply use 'Target Market'.</p><p>You just clearly don't understand the focus of this device. The iPad is clearly designed for people that want to be seen using an iPad.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>wannabe geek and fashion victim.Internally at Apple it 's less words to simply use 'Target Market'.You just clearly do n't understand the focus of this device .
The iPad is clearly designed for people that want to be seen using an iPad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wannabe geek and fashion victim.Internally at Apple it's less words to simply use 'Target Market'.You just clearly don't understand the focus of this device.
The iPad is clearly designed for people that want to be seen using an iPad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924522</id>
	<title>Games</title>
	<author>Boawk</author>
	<datestamp>1264586640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am curious to see how multi-touch gaming evolves.  On the iPhone game controls are confined to a small area due to the size.  I imagine there will be some pretty clever gaming innovation once developers apply their imagination to the multi-touch real estate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am curious to see how multi-touch gaming evolves .
On the iPhone game controls are confined to a small area due to the size .
I imagine there will be some pretty clever gaming innovation once developers apply their imagination to the multi-touch real estate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am curious to see how multi-touch gaming evolves.
On the iPhone game controls are confined to a small area due to the size.
I imagine there will be some pretty clever gaming innovation once developers apply their imagination to the multi-touch real estate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925262</id>
	<title>Lisa</title>
	<author>spacemky</author>
	<datestamp>1264588860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It should more aptly be named: iLisa 2010.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It should more aptly be named : iLisa 2010 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It should more aptly be named: iLisa 2010.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922644</id>
	<title>Cannot write with a pen!</title>
	<author>heteromonomer</author>
	<datestamp>1264624920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was hoping that this will be my ultimate notes-taking and doodling and design device. I own an X61 tablet with Win7 and am disappointed. Unfortunately the iPad is also disappointing. And what is with that name? iSlate would've been better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was hoping that this will be my ultimate notes-taking and doodling and design device .
I own an X61 tablet with Win7 and am disappointed .
Unfortunately the iPad is also disappointing .
And what is with that name ?
iSlate would 've been better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was hoping that this will be my ultimate notes-taking and doodling and design device.
I own an X61 tablet with Win7 and am disappointed.
Unfortunately the iPad is also disappointing.
And what is with that name?
iSlate would've been better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922514</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>LittleBigScript</author>
	<datestamp>1264624560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, we were all thinking it.</p><p>The infamous <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1BUH9eXy18" title="youtube.com">MadTV skit</a> [youtube.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , we were all thinking it.The infamous MadTV skit [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, we were all thinking it.The infamous MadTV skit [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923786</id>
	<title>Re:So far some interesting points</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1264584420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>ePub format for ebooks. Still can be DRMd (and probably with a format that makes it incompatible with other viewers?) but at least is an open format.</p></div><p>Well, at least there may be something good coming out of it. So far there has effectively been just one ePub DRM scheme, and if Apple signs up for that (I sure hope they do), this just might tip the scale enough to force Amazon to follow suit, and we'll finally get to the point where you can buy your book in any store, and, even though it is DRM'd, it can be opened on any reader.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>ePub format for ebooks .
Still can be DRMd ( and probably with a format that makes it incompatible with other viewers ?
) but at least is an open format.Well , at least there may be something good coming out of it .
So far there has effectively been just one ePub DRM scheme , and if Apple signs up for that ( I sure hope they do ) , this just might tip the scale enough to force Amazon to follow suit , and we 'll finally get to the point where you can buy your book in any store , and , even though it is DRM 'd , it can be opened on any reader .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ePub format for ebooks.
Still can be DRMd (and probably with a format that makes it incompatible with other viewers?
) but at least is an open format.Well, at least there may be something good coming out of it.
So far there has effectively been just one ePub DRM scheme, and if Apple signs up for that (I sure hope they do), this just might tip the scale enough to force Amazon to follow suit, and we'll finally get to the point where you can buy your book in any store, and, even though it is DRM'd, it can be opened on any reader.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921902</id>
	<title>It has 3G.</title>
	<author>WiiVault</author>
	<datestamp>1264623300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Uhhh. it has 3G dude.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uhhh .
it has 3G dude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uhhh.
it has 3G dude.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922760</id>
	<title>Re:This fits squarely in the category of "meh"</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1264625160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've never thought to myself, "how great would it be to have a 10-inch iPhone?" After watching the live coverage for the last hour, that's basically all this is.</p></div><p>Yes, but imagine watching the live coverage on a 10-inch iPhone!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never thought to myself , " how great would it be to have a 10-inch iPhone ?
" After watching the live coverage for the last hour , that 's basically all this is.Yes , but imagine watching the live coverage on a 10-inch iPhone !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never thought to myself, "how great would it be to have a 10-inch iPhone?
" After watching the live coverage for the last hour, that's basically all this is.Yes, but imagine watching the live coverage on a 10-inch iPhone!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929886</id>
	<title>Re:Perfect!</title>
	<author>okmijnuhb</author>
	<datestamp>1264616580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or make phone calls</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or make phone calls</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or make phone calls</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923210</id>
	<title>Looks like house boat syndrome to me...</title>
	<author>SandBender</author>
	<datestamp>1264583040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It isn't a good house and it isn't a good boat...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is n't a good house and it is n't a good boat.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It isn't a good house and it isn't a good boat...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924340</id>
	<title>Re:Fantastic!</title>
	<author>GraZZ</author>
	<datestamp>1264586040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, now we have 60 days of "ZOMG it's coming!!!" news to look forward to. Especially as everyone and their app-programming-mother shows off their NEW, on-the-iPad apps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , now we have 60 days of " ZOMG it 's coming ! ! !
" news to look forward to .
Especially as everyone and their app-programming-mother shows off their NEW , on-the-iPad apps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, now we have 60 days of "ZOMG it's coming!!!
" news to look forward to.
Especially as everyone and their app-programming-mother shows off their NEW, on-the-iPad apps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30934122</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig</title>
	<author>intheshelter</author>
	<datestamp>1264697460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who cares about a Nomad or an Archos?  I've NEVER seen or even heard of someone with them.  Maybe there's a reason neither of those has any buyers?</p><p>You ridiculous posts making no sense.  Lame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who cares about a Nomad or an Archos ?
I 've NEVER seen or even heard of someone with them .
Maybe there 's a reason neither of those has any buyers ? You ridiculous posts making no sense .
Lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who cares about a Nomad or an Archos?
I've NEVER seen or even heard of someone with them.
Maybe there's a reason neither of those has any buyers?You ridiculous posts making no sense.
Lame.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927810</id>
	<title>Apple event in alternate reality</title>
	<author>azrael29a</author>
	<datestamp>1264598400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.pidjin.net/2010/01/25/iwish/" title="pidjin.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.pidjin.net/2010/01/25/iwish/</a> [pidjin.net]
I wish that would have happened at the Apple event...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)))</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.pidjin.net/2010/01/25/iwish/ [ pidjin.net ] I wish that would have happened at the Apple event... : ) ) )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.pidjin.net/2010/01/25/iwish/ [pidjin.net]
I wish that would have happened at the Apple event... :)))</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926924</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>KlaymenDK</author>
	<datestamp>1264593960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>slate<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; verb  1. cover (a roof) with slates. 2 Brit. informal criticize severely. 3 chiefly N. Amer. schedule; plan.</p><p>No highlighting required, I trust.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>slate       verb 1. cover ( a roof ) with slates .
2 Brit .
informal criticize severely .
3 chiefly N. Amer. schedule ; plan.No highlighting required , I trust .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>slate
      verb  1. cover (a roof) with slates.
2 Brit.
informal criticize severely.
3 chiefly N. Amer. schedule; plan.No highlighting required, I trust.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924110</id>
	<title>Re:Watching the presentation live...</title>
	<author>peterprior</author>
	<datestamp>1264585380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well it is bleeding edge hardware....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well it is bleeding edge hardware... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well it is bleeding edge hardware....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923602</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Selfbain</author>
	<datestamp>1264584060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/27/apple-ipad-first-hands-on/" title="engadget.com">Engadget</a> [engadget.com] it doesn't multitask at all.<br> <br>
That's the deal killer for me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to Engadget [ engadget.com ] it does n't multitask at all .
That 's the deal killer for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to Engadget [engadget.com] it doesn't multitask at all.
That's the deal killer for me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923358</id>
	<title>Something the world DIDN'T need...</title>
	<author>logicassasin</author>
	<datestamp>1264583460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...was a bigger iPod Touch.</p><p>I stick by my earlier statement that the name makes it sound like digital Kotex. However, it mus be noted that Steve Jobs may have his first Edsel on his hands.</p><p>Seriously, the ASUS Eee PC T91MT gives you more of a computer for a bit less than the cost of this iPad (I chuckle every time I read or type that). REAL applications, REAL OS (not a "gadget" os), REAL everything! It's a tablet and a netbook at once. Approx $450 gets you 32GB SSD, 1GB RAM, and Win 7 all in a small package with a proven processor underneath it all.</p><p>$50 more get's you less drive space, an unknown amount of RAM, and a gadget OS running on what appears to be a 2010 version of the Cyrix MediaGX processor.</p><p>Steve needs to take some time off and rethink this one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...was a bigger iPod Touch.I stick by my earlier statement that the name makes it sound like digital Kotex .
However , it mus be noted that Steve Jobs may have his first Edsel on his hands.Seriously , the ASUS Eee PC T91MT gives you more of a computer for a bit less than the cost of this iPad ( I chuckle every time I read or type that ) .
REAL applications , REAL OS ( not a " gadget " os ) , REAL everything !
It 's a tablet and a netbook at once .
Approx $ 450 gets you 32GB SSD , 1GB RAM , and Win 7 all in a small package with a proven processor underneath it all. $ 50 more get 's you less drive space , an unknown amount of RAM , and a gadget OS running on what appears to be a 2010 version of the Cyrix MediaGX processor.Steve needs to take some time off and rethink this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...was a bigger iPod Touch.I stick by my earlier statement that the name makes it sound like digital Kotex.
However, it mus be noted that Steve Jobs may have his first Edsel on his hands.Seriously, the ASUS Eee PC T91MT gives you more of a computer for a bit less than the cost of this iPad (I chuckle every time I read or type that).
REAL applications, REAL OS (not a "gadget" os), REAL everything!
It's a tablet and a netbook at once.
Approx $450 gets you 32GB SSD, 1GB RAM, and Win 7 all in a small package with a proven processor underneath it all.$50 more get's you less drive space, an unknown amount of RAM, and a gadget OS running on what appears to be a 2010 version of the Cyrix MediaGX processor.Steve needs to take some time off and rethink this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925676</id>
	<title>Re:No WCMDA/HSPA or even CDMA/EVDO is a huge miss</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1264590000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only downside is that you have to take your five hundred dollar handheld computer into a restaurant where you eat greasy things with your fingers...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only downside is that you have to take your five hundred dollar handheld computer into a restaurant where you eat greasy things with your fingers.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only downside is that you have to take your five hundred dollar handheld computer into a restaurant where you eat greasy things with your fingers...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925032</id>
	<title>Seriously...</title>
	<author>charliemopps11</author>
	<datestamp>1264588140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who would buy this? It's garbage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who would buy this ?
It 's garbage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who would buy this?
It's garbage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927224</id>
	<title>Apple launches iPad for that time of iMonth</title>
	<author>David Gerard</author>
	<datestamp>1264595100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cult leader Steve Jobs has announced the iPad, a "revolutionary" advance in <a href="http://newstechnica.com/2010/01/27/apple-launches-ipad-for-that-time-of-imonth/" title="newstechnica.com">stylish personal hygiene with elegant design</a> [newstechnica.com].</p><p>The iPad has a 9.7in full-colour touchpad and wings. According to the box, you can watch movies, surf the internet, listen to music, view photos, read electronic books and go horseback riding, swimming, cycling, mountain-climbing and roller-skating. It also comes with iWork, which lets you do interesting and productive things at the office in between screaming at everyone for being such annoying and thoughtless idiots.</p><p>Apple has also launched an app store for the iPad which will allow users to purchase chocolate, whisky and heavy objects for when some fucker crosses you, <i>dares</i> look at you funny or is the sort of clueless arsehole who thinks the explanation of how pissed off you are at his behaviour is always PMT. Look, even if it might be, that's not the <i>point</i>.</p><p>For those who find pads too bulky, a special fluffy version of the iPod Shuffle is available, on a string.</p><p>Microsoft, who have attempted to sell increasingly bulky folded bath towels for the past decade, were not available for comment. Linux users and the Free Software Foundation were still pushing mooncups, but no-one paid them any attention.</p><p>"In conclusion," said Mr Jobs, "please, <i>please</i> don't kill me, darling. I love you more than anyone, honestly. Uhm<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... flowers?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cult leader Steve Jobs has announced the iPad , a " revolutionary " advance in stylish personal hygiene with elegant design [ newstechnica.com ] .The iPad has a 9.7in full-colour touchpad and wings .
According to the box , you can watch movies , surf the internet , listen to music , view photos , read electronic books and go horseback riding , swimming , cycling , mountain-climbing and roller-skating .
It also comes with iWork , which lets you do interesting and productive things at the office in between screaming at everyone for being such annoying and thoughtless idiots.Apple has also launched an app store for the iPad which will allow users to purchase chocolate , whisky and heavy objects for when some fucker crosses you , dares look at you funny or is the sort of clueless arsehole who thinks the explanation of how pissed off you are at his behaviour is always PMT .
Look , even if it might be , that 's not the point.For those who find pads too bulky , a special fluffy version of the iPod Shuffle is available , on a string.Microsoft , who have attempted to sell increasingly bulky folded bath towels for the past decade , were not available for comment .
Linux users and the Free Software Foundation were still pushing mooncups , but no-one paid them any attention .
" In conclusion , " said Mr Jobs , " please , please do n't kill me , darling .
I love you more than anyone , honestly .
Uhm .. .
flowers ? "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cult leader Steve Jobs has announced the iPad, a "revolutionary" advance in stylish personal hygiene with elegant design [newstechnica.com].The iPad has a 9.7in full-colour touchpad and wings.
According to the box, you can watch movies, surf the internet, listen to music, view photos, read electronic books and go horseback riding, swimming, cycling, mountain-climbing and roller-skating.
It also comes with iWork, which lets you do interesting and productive things at the office in between screaming at everyone for being such annoying and thoughtless idiots.Apple has also launched an app store for the iPad which will allow users to purchase chocolate, whisky and heavy objects for when some fucker crosses you, dares look at you funny or is the sort of clueless arsehole who thinks the explanation of how pissed off you are at his behaviour is always PMT.
Look, even if it might be, that's not the point.For those who find pads too bulky, a special fluffy version of the iPod Shuffle is available, on a string.Microsoft, who have attempted to sell increasingly bulky folded bath towels for the past decade, were not available for comment.
Linux users and the Free Software Foundation were still pushing mooncups, but no-one paid them any attention.
"In conclusion," said Mr Jobs, "please, please don't kill me, darling.
I love you more than anyone, honestly.
Uhm ...
flowers?"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925206</id>
	<title>Re:3G Data Plans</title>
	<author>cbhacking</author>
	<datestamp>1264588620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>s/unlimited/5GB/g</p><p>One of these days there's going to be a suit over how bloody much the carriers charge you if you go over 5GB on their "unlimited" plans. Probably not an issue with a phone, but something like this? At full resolution that's only a few hours of video.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>s/unlimited/5GB/gOne of these days there 's going to be a suit over how bloody much the carriers charge you if you go over 5GB on their " unlimited " plans .
Probably not an issue with a phone , but something like this ?
At full resolution that 's only a few hours of video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>s/unlimited/5GB/gOne of these days there's going to be a suit over how bloody much the carriers charge you if you go over 5GB on their "unlimited" plans.
Probably not an issue with a phone, but something like this?
At full resolution that's only a few hours of video.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925254</id>
	<title>Re:The iPad is a Platform</title>
	<author>jpmorgan</author>
	<datestamp>1264588860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The iPhone was successful as a new platform because it was a phone. A lot of people got iPhones initially because it was a phone + iPod. That, and a certain amount of Apple fanboyism was enough. The question is, is the iPad going to be compelling enough to get the same kind of traction as the iPhone did? And from what I'm seeing on the internet, the early adopters are not impressed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The iPhone was successful as a new platform because it was a phone .
A lot of people got iPhones initially because it was a phone + iPod .
That , and a certain amount of Apple fanboyism was enough .
The question is , is the iPad going to be compelling enough to get the same kind of traction as the iPhone did ?
And from what I 'm seeing on the internet , the early adopters are not impressed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iPhone was successful as a new platform because it was a phone.
A lot of people got iPhones initially because it was a phone + iPod.
That, and a certain amount of Apple fanboyism was enough.
The question is, is the iPad going to be compelling enough to get the same kind of traction as the iPhone did?
And from what I'm seeing on the internet, the early adopters are not impressed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924002</id>
	<title>the internet-enabled panty liner</title>
	<author>cfriedt</author>
	<datestamp>1264585020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>please tell me someone thought this was a funny name before i did...</htmltext>
<tokenext>please tell me someone thought this was a funny name before i did.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>please tell me someone thought this was a funny name before i did...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927894</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264598880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could have been worse.  They could have called it the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... tap-on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could have been worse .
They could have called it the ... tap-on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could have been worse.
They could have called it the ... tap-on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927764</id>
	<title>willionaire</title>
	<author>lionaire</author>
	<datestamp>1264598040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>






<div><p>I'm really tired of the "iPad" being called a
"tablet". . .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.A tablet is something you can write or draw on*, NOT
something you awkwardly type and fingerpaint on.</p> </htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm really tired of the " iPad " being called a " tablet " .
. .
.A tablet is something you can write or draw on * , NOT something you awkwardly type and fingerpaint on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>






I'm really tired of the "iPad" being called a
"tablet".
. .
.A tablet is something you can write or draw on*, NOT
something you awkwardly type and fingerpaint on. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921440</id>
	<title>Phenomenal</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1264622280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>To see the whole page is phenomenal</p></div><p>I'm not sure "phenomenal" is the right term to describe "seeing a whole page".  You would think that we've never been able to see a whole page before and that Steve Jobs is personally responsible for some entirely new experience.</p><p>I guess that's what they mean by the reality distortion field.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>You can turn it any way you want.</p></div><p>Good god, you mean I can pick the thing up and actually turn it?  I'm so excited I'm about to soil myself!  Will Apple innovations never cease?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To see the whole page is phenomenalI 'm not sure " phenomenal " is the right term to describe " seeing a whole page " .
You would think that we 've never been able to see a whole page before and that Steve Jobs is personally responsible for some entirely new experience.I guess that 's what they mean by the reality distortion field.You can turn it any way you want.Good god , you mean I can pick the thing up and actually turn it ?
I 'm so excited I 'm about to soil myself !
Will Apple innovations never cease ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To see the whole page is phenomenalI'm not sure "phenomenal" is the right term to describe "seeing a whole page".
You would think that we've never been able to see a whole page before and that Steve Jobs is personally responsible for some entirely new experience.I guess that's what they mean by the reality distortion field.You can turn it any way you want.Good god, you mean I can pick the thing up and actually turn it?
I'm so excited I'm about to soil myself!
Will Apple innovations never cease?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928842</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Macrat</author>
	<datestamp>1264605600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not exactly a new name.</p><p>In Star Trek TNG, the hand held tablets were called PADs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not exactly a new name.In Star Trek TNG , the hand held tablets were called PADs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not exactly a new name.In Star Trek TNG, the hand held tablets were called PADs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922660</id>
	<title>iPad or ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>more like an iFad</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>more like an iFad</tokentext>
<sentencetext>more like an iFad</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921582</id>
	<title>Re:Like him or loath him</title>
	<author>WegianWarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1264622580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because people - and not just the fanboys - buy into the iHype and are fooled into believing they need one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because people - and not just the fanboys - buy into the iHype and are fooled into believing they need one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because people - and not just the fanboys - buy into the iHype and are fooled into believing they need one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921756</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1264622940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What an unfortunate name.</p></div><p>Just wait until Apple partners with Sprint next year and releases the WiMax iPad.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What an unfortunate name.Just wait until Apple partners with Sprint next year and releases the WiMax iPad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What an unfortunate name.Just wait until Apple partners with Sprint next year and releases the WiMax iPad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923506</id>
	<title>iBachelor</title>
	<author>yabba-dabba-do</author>
	<datestamp>1264583760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The iPad sounds like a place an iBachelor would live.  He might even try bring his iDates back to his iPad...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The iPad sounds like a place an iBachelor would live .
He might even try bring his iDates back to his iPad.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iPad sounds like a place an iBachelor would live.
He might even try bring his iDates back to his iPad...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925634</id>
	<title>ipad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264589880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wife asked if it came with wings<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. bhraw-ha-ha, screwed up stevey</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wife asked if it came with wings .. bhraw-ha-ha , screwed up stevey</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wife asked if it came with wings .. bhraw-ha-ha, screwed up stevey</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923556</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Yhippa</author>
	<datestamp>1264583880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To be fair, Apple probably made the decision to get the base product in the hands of customers.  You can choose to buy it or not.  Nobody is putting a gun up to your head or anything.

I have a Palm Pre and it seems like it gets additional useful features every few months that go by.  I'm OK with that.  I liked the base functionality enough where I was willing to sacrifice having a video player and an app store right now.

Iterative releases aren't always bad.  I'm okay with delayed inclusion of features as long as the overall package makes my life better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair , Apple probably made the decision to get the base product in the hands of customers .
You can choose to buy it or not .
Nobody is putting a gun up to your head or anything .
I have a Palm Pre and it seems like it gets additional useful features every few months that go by .
I 'm OK with that .
I liked the base functionality enough where I was willing to sacrifice having a video player and an app store right now .
Iterative releases are n't always bad .
I 'm okay with delayed inclusion of features as long as the overall package makes my life better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair, Apple probably made the decision to get the base product in the hands of customers.
You can choose to buy it or not.
Nobody is putting a gun up to your head or anything.
I have a Palm Pre and it seems like it gets additional useful features every few months that go by.
I'm OK with that.
I liked the base functionality enough where I was willing to sacrifice having a video player and an app store right now.
Iterative releases aren't always bad.
I'm okay with delayed inclusion of features as long as the overall package makes my life better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924602</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>quadelirus</author>
	<datestamp>1264586820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just came across a really good discussion by John Gruber about this: <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2010/01/apple\_adobe\_flash" title="daringfireball.net">http://daringfireball.net/2010/01/apple\_adobe\_flash</a> [daringfireball.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just came across a really good discussion by John Gruber about this : http : //daringfireball.net/2010/01/apple \ _adobe \ _flash [ daringfireball.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just came across a really good discussion by John Gruber about this: http://daringfireball.net/2010/01/apple\_adobe\_flash [daringfireball.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925744</id>
	<title>Re:This fits squarely in the category of "meh"</title>
	<author>Not\_Wiggins</author>
	<datestamp>1264590240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I have both an iPhone and a MacBook and I use and love both everyday. However, I've never thought to myself, "how great would it be to have a 10-inch iPhone?" </i> <br> <br>
Don't know if you know it, but you have an EXCELLENT idea!<br> <br>IPhone screen too small for Grandma's failing eye site? FINALLY an IPhone for an older generation! Imagine... a bus full of elderly dialing out on their IPad phones!<br>It would harken back to the early days of cellphones... you know, for the nostalgic missing their brick/bag phones.<br>You can even explain that since it is bigger, she'd be able to hear the conversations better, too!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have both an iPhone and a MacBook and I use and love both everyday .
However , I 've never thought to myself , " how great would it be to have a 10-inch iPhone ?
" Do n't know if you know it , but you have an EXCELLENT idea !
IPhone screen too small for Grandma 's failing eye site ?
FINALLY an IPhone for an older generation !
Imagine... a bus full of elderly dialing out on their IPad phones ! It would harken back to the early days of cellphones... you know , for the nostalgic missing their brick/bag phones.You can even explain that since it is bigger , she 'd be able to hear the conversations better , too !
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have both an iPhone and a MacBook and I use and love both everyday.
However, I've never thought to myself, "how great would it be to have a 10-inch iPhone?
"   
Don't know if you know it, but you have an EXCELLENT idea!
IPhone screen too small for Grandma's failing eye site?
FINALLY an IPhone for an older generation!
Imagine... a bus full of elderly dialing out on their IPad phones!It would harken back to the early days of cellphones... you know, for the nostalgic missing their brick/bag phones.You can even explain that since it is bigger, she'd be able to hear the conversations better, too!
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928452</id>
	<title>cant use on the airplane?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264602600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So from the apple website.</p><p>Maximum operating altitude: 10,000 feet (3000 m)</p><p>Does this mean no one can use it on an airplane?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So from the apple website.Maximum operating altitude : 10,000 feet ( 3000 m ) Does this mean no one can use it on an airplane ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So from the apple website.Maximum operating altitude: 10,000 feet (3000 m)Does this mean no one can use it on an airplane?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30933306</id>
	<title>2 things missing</title>
	<author>linoleo</author>
	<datestamp>1264694520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That thing needs some sort of protective cover for the screen... how about a hinged lid?<br>Oh yeah, and while you're at it stick a keyboard inside the lid, then you'd really have something!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That thing needs some sort of protective cover for the screen... how about a hinged lid ? Oh yeah , and while you 're at it stick a keyboard inside the lid , then you 'd really have something !
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That thing needs some sort of protective cover for the screen... how about a hinged lid?Oh yeah, and while you're at it stick a keyboard inside the lid, then you'd really have something!
:-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921648</id>
	<title>One heckuva phone!</title>
	<author>serviscope\_minor</author>
	<datestamp>1264622760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is one heckuva phone. It's nearly the size of a DynaTAC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is one heckuva phone .
It 's nearly the size of a DynaTAC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is one heckuva phone.
It's nearly the size of a DynaTAC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922868</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264625400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hopefully not.  I don't know of any products with worse security records than Acrobat Reader and Flash. </p></div><p>How about the Quick Time plugin that is forcibly installed whenever I install iTunes?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully not .
I do n't know of any products with worse security records than Acrobat Reader and Flash .
How about the Quick Time plugin that is forcibly installed whenever I install iTunes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully not.
I don't know of any products with worse security records than Acrobat Reader and Flash.
How about the Quick Time plugin that is forcibly installed whenever I install iTunes?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929286</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously...</title>
	<author>exomondo</author>
	<datestamp>1264609980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are a class of people who would buy Steve Jobs' dump if he shrink wrapped it and put an 'i' in front of it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are a class of people who would buy Steve Jobs ' dump if he shrink wrapped it and put an 'i ' in front of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are a class of people who would buy Steve Jobs' dump if he shrink wrapped it and put an 'i' in front of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923448</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Chris Pimlott</author>
	<datestamp>1264583640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You can use ClickToFlash on Safari in 10.6 to tell the Youtube site to serve the H.264 iPhone version to your browser instead of the flash version too - much nicer.</p></div><p>Or, <a href="http://youtube-global.blogspot.com/2010/01/introducing-youtube-html5-supported.html" title="blogspot.com">as of last week</a> [blogspot.com], you can <a href="http://www.youtube.com/html5" title="youtube.com">have YouTube give you H.264 videos with HTML5.</a> [youtube.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can use ClickToFlash on Safari in 10.6 to tell the Youtube site to serve the H.264 iPhone version to your browser instead of the flash version too - much nicer.Or , as of last week [ blogspot.com ] , you can have YouTube give you H.264 videos with HTML5 .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can use ClickToFlash on Safari in 10.6 to tell the Youtube site to serve the H.264 iPhone version to your browser instead of the flash version too - much nicer.Or, as of last week [blogspot.com], you can have YouTube give you H.264 videos with HTML5.
[youtube.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921762</id>
	<title>Re:Compared to netbooks</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1264623000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes. You can buy a netbook with internal 3G, which this thing lacks (and is unlikely to be extensible in terms of hardware).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
You can buy a netbook with internal 3G , which this thing lacks ( and is unlikely to be extensible in terms of hardware ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
You can buy a netbook with internal 3G, which this thing lacks (and is unlikely to be extensible in terms of hardware).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921566</id>
	<title>Fantastic!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now that we've gotten that out of the way, can we move on now?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that we 've gotten that out of the way , can we move on now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that we've gotten that out of the way, can we move on now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926142</id>
	<title>Re:3G Data Plans</title>
	<author>RightSaidFred99</author>
	<datestamp>1264591440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Right.  Paying $30 a month so you can access the web from a Tablet (which has been around forever) is just so \_neat\_.  I'm sure people will be lined up to do that.  On top of their existing broadband and their existing cell phone bill, people are just going to fall all over themselves to pay $30 for this, I'm just sure of it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Right .
Paying $ 30 a month so you can access the web from a Tablet ( which has been around forever ) is just so \ _neat \ _ .
I 'm sure people will be lined up to do that .
On top of their existing broadband and their existing cell phone bill , people are just going to fall all over themselves to pay $ 30 for this , I 'm just sure of it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right.
Paying $30 a month so you can access the web from a Tablet (which has been around forever) is just so \_neat\_.
I'm sure people will be lined up to do that.
On top of their existing broadband and their existing cell phone bill, people are just going to fall all over themselves to pay $30 for this, I'm just sure of it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925562</id>
	<title>I hope this forces Amazon to</title>
	<author>melted</author>
	<datestamp>1264589760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope this forces Amazon to drop Kindle DX to $299  and include an SD card slot. Fact is, with this device out there, Kindle DX is overpriced as hell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope this forces Amazon to drop Kindle DX to $ 299 and include an SD card slot .
Fact is , with this device out there , Kindle DX is overpriced as hell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope this forces Amazon to drop Kindle DX to $299  and include an SD card slot.
Fact is, with this device out there, Kindle DX is overpriced as hell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923338</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Swift2001</author>
	<datestamp>1264583400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're watching the H.264 version.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're watching the H.264 version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're watching the H.264 version.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925420</id>
	<title>Lame</title>
	<author>wembley fraggle</author>
	<datestamp>1264589280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, it's got wireless and I don't even know if they make Nomads anymore. But: no handwriting input, no web cam. Lame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , it 's got wireless and I do n't even know if they make Nomads anymore .
But : no handwriting input , no web cam .
Lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, it's got wireless and I don't even know if they make Nomads anymore.
But: no handwriting input, no web cam.
Lame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926272</id>
	<title>Steve Jobs singlehandedly created the iPad</title>
	<author>Boawk</author>
	<datestamp>1264591800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news\_briefs/frantic\_steve\_jobs\_stays\_up" title="theonion.com" rel="nofollow">From America's Finest News source</a> [theonion.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>From America 's Finest News source [ theonion.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From America's Finest News source [theonion.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926808</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1264593480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I want to see <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-disses-netbooks-again-2009-9" title="businessinsider.com">this picture</a> [businessinsider.com], but with a scratched iPad in place of the netbook.</p></div><p>Actually, prior to the March ship date Apple is planning to introduce new apparel - the iJean. Their design includes 10-inch cargo pockets that are only 1/2" deep - perfect for the iPad.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to see this picture [ businessinsider.com ] , but with a scratched iPad in place of the netbook.Actually , prior to the March ship date Apple is planning to introduce new apparel - the iJean .
Their design includes 10-inch cargo pockets that are only 1/2 " deep - perfect for the iPad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to see this picture [businessinsider.com], but with a scratched iPad in place of the netbook.Actually, prior to the March ship date Apple is planning to introduce new apparel - the iJean.
Their design includes 10-inch cargo pockets that are only 1/2" deep - perfect for the iPad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924660</id>
	<title>Re:3G Data Plans</title>
	<author>Z\_A\_Commando</author>
	<datestamp>1264587000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Something else for AT&amp;T to blame for overwhelming its network...?</p><p>Plus since there are no contracts, AT&amp;T can raise the price every month if they want</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Something else for AT&amp;T to blame for overwhelming its network... ? Plus since there are no contracts , AT&amp;T can raise the price every month if they want</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something else for AT&amp;T to blame for overwhelming its network...?Plus since there are no contracts, AT&amp;T can raise the price every month if they want</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925494</id>
	<title>Re:Phenomenal</title>
	<author>Sandbags</author>
	<datestamp>1264589520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, considdering both the low res of netbooks, and the portrait-only widescreen display mode, and considdering no other mobile device can do that, honestly he's right, this is the first mobile device other than an full scale notebook platform that can display an entire web site on a screen.  (old school tablets too, but they're not exactly $500 devices either).</p><p>on the exclamation of turning it, yea, i agree.  Not exactly revolutionary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , considdering both the low res of netbooks , and the portrait-only widescreen display mode , and considdering no other mobile device can do that , honestly he 's right , this is the first mobile device other than an full scale notebook platform that can display an entire web site on a screen .
( old school tablets too , but they 're not exactly $ 500 devices either ) .on the exclamation of turning it , yea , i agree .
Not exactly revolutionary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, considdering both the low res of netbooks, and the portrait-only widescreen display mode, and considdering no other mobile device can do that, honestly he's right, this is the first mobile device other than an full scale notebook platform that can display an entire web site on a screen.
(old school tablets too, but they're not exactly $500 devices either).on the exclamation of turning it, yea, i agree.
Not exactly revolutionary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925702</id>
	<title>Re:is late</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1264590060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"Ip ad" doesn't mean anything in English. "Is late" meant Duke Nukem Forever for several years.</p></div></blockquote><p>OTOH, "I pad" (which is how "iPad" is pronounced) does mean something in English, usually involving deception (whether it refers to a resume or an undergarment), so I can't see how that makes "iPad" a better product name than "iSlate".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Ip ad " does n't mean anything in English .
" Is late " meant Duke Nukem Forever for several years.OTOH , " I pad " ( which is how " iPad " is pronounced ) does mean something in English , usually involving deception ( whether it refers to a resume or an undergarment ) , so I ca n't see how that makes " iPad " a better product name than " iSlate " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Ip ad" doesn't mean anything in English.
"Is late" meant Duke Nukem Forever for several years.OTOH, "I pad" (which is how "iPad" is pronounced) does mean something in English, usually involving deception (whether it refers to a resume or an undergarment), so I can't see how that makes "iPad" a better product name than "iSlate".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926168</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264591500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why maxi pad?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why maxi pad ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why maxi pad?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928438</id>
	<title>Re:Name already in use.</title>
	<author>base3</author>
	<datestamp>1264602360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I knew there was a reason I printed that to PDF before I posted! Also, <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20080408091311/http://www.apple.com/downloads/dashboard/business/ipad.html" title="archive.org" rel="nofollow">archive.org</a> [archive.org] has got it, at least until the takedown there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew there was a reason I printed that to PDF before I posted !
Also , archive.org [ archive.org ] has got it , at least until the takedown there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew there was a reason I printed that to PDF before I posted!
Also, archive.org [archive.org] has got it, at least until the takedown there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929490</id>
	<title>Re:Phenomenal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264612380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>To see the whole page is phenomenal</p></div><p>I'm not sure "phenomenal" is the right term to describe "seeing a whole page". You would think that we've never been able to see a whole page before and that Steve Jobs is personally responsible for some entirely new experience.</p><p>I guess that's what they mean by the reality distortion field.</p></div><p>*Slapsknee* Hooo, boy, y'sure got 'em with that one, Mikey Jack. I bet your existing mobile device can show a readable page on a single screen too... right, Mikey? Hey, Mikey, why don't you answer?</p><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>You can turn it any way you want.</p></div><p>Good god, you mean I can pick the thing up and actually turn it? I'm so excited I'm about to soil myself! Will Apple innovations never cease?</p></div><p>Burn! Face! Moded! Ha ha, you sure showed them Silly Con Valley boys, Mikey Jack. Why, just the other day I flipped your laptop sideways and the monitor stayed exactly in place without adapting for your convenience... Mikey, come back.. awww, where ya goin, Mikey?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To see the whole page is phenomenalI 'm not sure " phenomenal " is the right term to describe " seeing a whole page " .
You would think that we 've never been able to see a whole page before and that Steve Jobs is personally responsible for some entirely new experience.I guess that 's what they mean by the reality distortion field .
* Slapsknee * Hooo , boy , y'sure got 'em with that one , Mikey Jack .
I bet your existing mobile device can show a readable page on a single screen too... right , Mikey ?
Hey , Mikey , why do n't you answer ? You can turn it any way you want.Good god , you mean I can pick the thing up and actually turn it ?
I 'm so excited I 'm about to soil myself !
Will Apple innovations never cease ? Burn !
Face ! Moded !
Ha ha , you sure showed them Silly Con Valley boys , Mikey Jack .
Why , just the other day I flipped your laptop sideways and the monitor stayed exactly in place without adapting for your convenience... Mikey , come back.. awww , where ya goin , Mikey ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To see the whole page is phenomenalI'm not sure "phenomenal" is the right term to describe "seeing a whole page".
You would think that we've never been able to see a whole page before and that Steve Jobs is personally responsible for some entirely new experience.I guess that's what they mean by the reality distortion field.
*Slapsknee* Hooo, boy, y'sure got 'em with that one, Mikey Jack.
I bet your existing mobile device can show a readable page on a single screen too... right, Mikey?
Hey, Mikey, why don't you answer?You can turn it any way you want.Good god, you mean I can pick the thing up and actually turn it?
I'm so excited I'm about to soil myself!
Will Apple innovations never cease?Burn!
Face! Moded!
Ha ha, you sure showed them Silly Con Valley boys, Mikey Jack.
Why, just the other day I flipped your laptop sideways and the monitor stayed exactly in place without adapting for your convenience... Mikey, come back.. awww, where ya goin, Mikey?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922188</id>
	<title>starts at 499$</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264623840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wifi:<br>499 - 16gb<br>599 - 32gb<br>699$ - 64gb</p><p>wifi + 3g<br>629$ - 16gb<br>729$ - 32gb<br>829$ - 64gb</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wifi : 499 - 16gb599 - 32gb699 $ - 64gbwifi + 3g629 $ - 16gb729 $ - 32gb829 $ - 64gb</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wifi:499 - 16gb599 - 32gb699$ - 64gbwifi + 3g629$ - 16gb729$ - 32gb829$ - 64gb</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921722</id>
	<title>yeapers</title>
	<author>NetNinja</author>
	<datestamp>1264622940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IPaid to Much!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IPaid to Much !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IPaid to Much!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922302</id>
	<title>So far some interesting points</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1264624140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>- Takes advantage of the huge amount of available iPhone apps, at least the ones that have sense to be run without phone.
</p><p>- <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPUB" title="wikipedia.org">ePub</a> [wikipedia.org] format for ebooks. Still can be DRMd (and probably with a format that makes it incompatible with other viewers?) but at least is an open format.
</p><p>- Capacitive touchscreen, what about accuracy? will matter in such device?
</p><p>- The presentation seems to be more about apps than about device

</p><p>For a mobile device, still takes the desktop approach of storage (of movies, apps, books,etc), instead of the cloud one. Google could get the edge over them if moves to their cloud the most used parts of that functionality with Chrome and CHromeOS in ANY computer, not just tablets (if manage to calm down people worried about privacy and ownership of that content).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>- Takes advantage of the huge amount of available iPhone apps , at least the ones that have sense to be run without phone .
- ePub [ wikipedia.org ] format for ebooks .
Still can be DRMd ( and probably with a format that makes it incompatible with other viewers ?
) but at least is an open format .
- Capacitive touchscreen , what about accuracy ?
will matter in such device ?
- The presentation seems to be more about apps than about device For a mobile device , still takes the desktop approach of storage ( of movies , apps , books,etc ) , instead of the cloud one .
Google could get the edge over them if moves to their cloud the most used parts of that functionality with Chrome and CHromeOS in ANY computer , not just tablets ( if manage to calm down people worried about privacy and ownership of that content ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- Takes advantage of the huge amount of available iPhone apps, at least the ones that have sense to be run without phone.
- ePub [wikipedia.org] format for ebooks.
Still can be DRMd (and probably with a format that makes it incompatible with other viewers?
) but at least is an open format.
- Capacitive touchscreen, what about accuracy?
will matter in such device?
- The presentation seems to be more about apps than about device

For a mobile device, still takes the desktop approach of storage (of movies, apps, books,etc), instead of the cloud one.
Google could get the edge over them if moves to their cloud the most used parts of that functionality with Chrome and CHromeOS in ANY computer, not just tablets (if manage to calm down people worried about privacy and ownership of that content).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924922</id>
	<title>do NOT want</title>
	<author>adachan</author>
	<datestamp>1264587780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>After watching the live song and dance associated with the device, I ask myself, "Why in the world do I need this?"  There is nothing compelling to the ipad.  I think this will fail as most tablets have failed before.</htmltext>
<tokenext>After watching the live song and dance associated with the device , I ask myself , " Why in the world do I need this ?
" There is nothing compelling to the ipad .
I think this will fail as most tablets have failed before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After watching the live song and dance associated with the device, I ask myself, "Why in the world do I need this?
"  There is nothing compelling to the ipad.
I think this will fail as most tablets have failed before.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923156</id>
	<title>Well, I don't really know what to think.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264582920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In a way, ti doesn't have multitasking (how the hell can such an advanced device not have multitasking? That's insane), it doesn't have a camera (c'mon, this would be very nice to use Skype for instance), and it still doesn't support flash (which for me it's the biggest problem of the device, it should just be open<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... anybody should be able to program for it in which language you have a compiler for in Mac OSX and do whatever they want to do<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and one of the first in the list would be flash. Apple is being greedy wanting everything to pass by the App Store and get their share).</p><p>On the other side <b>a kindle DX costs $490 for christ sake</b> if I had use for a Kindle DX, I would certainly be happier and better served by the iPad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a way , ti does n't have multitasking ( how the hell can such an advanced device not have multitasking ?
That 's insane ) , it does n't have a camera ( c'mon , this would be very nice to use Skype for instance ) , and it still does n't support flash ( which for me it 's the biggest problem of the device , it should just be open ... anybody should be able to program for it in which language you have a compiler for in Mac OSX and do whatever they want to do ... and one of the first in the list would be flash .
Apple is being greedy wanting everything to pass by the App Store and get their share ) .On the other side a kindle DX costs $ 490 for christ sake if I had use for a Kindle DX , I would certainly be happier and better served by the iPad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a way, ti doesn't have multitasking (how the hell can such an advanced device not have multitasking?
That's insane), it doesn't have a camera (c'mon, this would be very nice to use Skype for instance), and it still doesn't support flash (which for me it's the biggest problem of the device, it should just be open ... anybody should be able to program for it in which language you have a compiler for in Mac OSX and do whatever they want to do ... and one of the first in the list would be flash.
Apple is being greedy wanting everything to pass by the App Store and get their share).On the other side a kindle DX costs $490 for christ sake if I had use for a Kindle DX, I would certainly be happier and better served by the iPad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923088</id>
	<title>Now Apple will just sell you a screen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264582800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only way Apple has ever been able to sell consumer technology below $1000 is by selling you a screen.  Joking aside the more I think about it the more screwed up this is.</p><p>I still can't keep my whole music collection on a single device.  I have to attach a hard disk instead. ( I realize this is a special case - but I don't need to just listen to Bob Dylan or the Beatles all the time - there's a larger Universe of sound out there than those jokers)</p><p>It doesn't look like I can use Darwin and do shell scripting either.  People who use computing devices are not an insignificant minority.</p><p>From and ergonomic perspective typing with this in my lap is not going to work.  It will slip all over the table.</p><p>This is definitely a situation where the tools we use begin to shape us and in this case, not in a good way at all.</p><p>The name makes me laugh but having been a fan of Apple, it's actually quite sad how useless this thing will become no matter how much they sell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only way Apple has ever been able to sell consumer technology below $ 1000 is by selling you a screen .
Joking aside the more I think about it the more screwed up this is.I still ca n't keep my whole music collection on a single device .
I have to attach a hard disk instead .
( I realize this is a special case - but I do n't need to just listen to Bob Dylan or the Beatles all the time - there 's a larger Universe of sound out there than those jokers ) It does n't look like I can use Darwin and do shell scripting either .
People who use computing devices are not an insignificant minority.From and ergonomic perspective typing with this in my lap is not going to work .
It will slip all over the table.This is definitely a situation where the tools we use begin to shape us and in this case , not in a good way at all.The name makes me laugh but having been a fan of Apple , it 's actually quite sad how useless this thing will become no matter how much they sell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only way Apple has ever been able to sell consumer technology below $1000 is by selling you a screen.
Joking aside the more I think about it the more screwed up this is.I still can't keep my whole music collection on a single device.
I have to attach a hard disk instead.
( I realize this is a special case - but I don't need to just listen to Bob Dylan or the Beatles all the time - there's a larger Universe of sound out there than those jokers)It doesn't look like I can use Darwin and do shell scripting either.
People who use computing devices are not an insignificant minority.From and ergonomic perspective typing with this in my lap is not going to work.
It will slip all over the table.This is definitely a situation where the tools we use begin to shape us and in this case, not in a good way at all.The name makes me laugh but having been a fan of Apple, it's actually quite sad how useless this thing will become no matter how much they sell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924086</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>DeadPixels</author>
	<datestamp>1264585320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In that case, I don't expect to see HTML5 support, either, considering YouTube and a few other major video streaming sites are experimenting with it now.<br> <br>Unless, of course, it already supports HTML5 and I've missed it in the onslaught of coverage. A quick scan of TFAs didn't reveal anything, but if anyone knows differently, please let me know.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In that case , I do n't expect to see HTML5 support , either , considering YouTube and a few other major video streaming sites are experimenting with it now .
Unless , of course , it already supports HTML5 and I 've missed it in the onslaught of coverage .
A quick scan of TFAs did n't reveal anything , but if anyone knows differently , please let me know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In that case, I don't expect to see HTML5 support, either, considering YouTube and a few other major video streaming sites are experimenting with it now.
Unless, of course, it already supports HTML5 and I've missed it in the onslaught of coverage.
A quick scan of TFAs didn't reveal anything, but if anyone knows differently, please let me know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300</id>
	<title>Taking Jobs at his word</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"Way better than a laptop, way better then a phone."</p></div></blockquote><p>So Apple is basically saying that we should stop buying MacBooks and iPhones?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Way better than a laptop , way better then a phone .
" So Apple is basically saying that we should stop buying MacBooks and iPhones ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Way better than a laptop, way better then a phone.
"So Apple is basically saying that we should stop buying MacBooks and iPhones?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926128</id>
	<title>iPad?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264591380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will my wife mistakenly attempt to use this during her monthly cycle? Does it have wings?</p><p>Lousy name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will my wife mistakenly attempt to use this during her monthly cycle ?
Does it have wings ? Lousy name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will my wife mistakenly attempt to use this during her monthly cycle?
Does it have wings?Lousy name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925520</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>pclminion</author>
	<datestamp>1264589580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't like the name because it's too close to iPod.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't like the name because it 's too close to iPod .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't like the name because it's too close to iPod.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929988</id>
	<title>It is all about flash.</title>
	<author>poofyhairguy82</author>
	<datestamp>1264617720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the end I don't think this will be real popular, and it will be the lack of Flash that makes it unpopular- and no HTML5 is not the answer...</p><p>I am not saying that Flash or Silverlight is superior to HTML5 in any way. Flash in particular is proprietary junk. Flash versions for not popular systems (PowerPC, Linux, etc) are usually terrible, and playback of Flash requires WAY more CPU use than it should- on an Atom Netbook fullscreen Flash plays poorly in OSX. I bet Flash on one of these iPads would be super terrible on the 1GHz CPU- Steve Jobs probably considers keeping Flash out of the app store a quality control measure.</p><p>With that said the appeal of the Netbook market (which Jobs very blatantly backwards admitted is the competitors to the iPad) was that consumers could get REAL computers for cheap prices at a low size. A Netbook is supposed to be more than a gloried Pocket PC- it is a secondary system when you need more power than an Smartphone can provide. And one of the real barriers that separate a Smartphone and a laptop in 2010 is the ability to use "real" Flash. Even if all of sites switch over to HTML5 in the next year (a very optimistic goal considering that fact that IE use is so high), is it a guarantee that the iPad can play back the content well? Review will soon tell us, and then we will know if this first gen iPad has a promising future or not...</p><p>Honestly the form factor for the iPad is perfect- anyone with a brain could figure that the natural progression for Netbooks was for them to ditch the keyboards for touchscreens. Any decent SciFi since the original Star Trek has shown us how important tablet PCs will be in the future.</p><p>But the current iPad misses that mark by a great deal because it is not a full featured computer. Is is a bigger Smartphone, with all the limitations of that market.</p><p>Until an iPad can do everything a laptop can for say a college student (lacking Flash kills that- my college age sister couldn't go a day without her Hulu) or a business executive (lacking real Microsoft Office kills that for when you REALLY need Office) that what you are really looking at is a EXPENSIVE secondary "toy" for a large part of the market that currently buys laptops. Which is basically the market Netbooks have now (I will admit for serious work they are a toy), but the difference is that a Netbook costs as much as a game console, while a iPad costs as much as a REAL 15inch Windows laptop.</p><p>I can guess what Apple is thinking- that there is enough apps in the App Store to do everything that most "real" people do with computers. If someone wants a real computer for something specific then they are advanced enough to shell out the thousand bucks for a real Mac laptop. But I get the feeling that the iPad is purposefully neutered with a kiddie slope OS to ensure that it does not dig into the Mac Book market. Can't wait to see if people can Hackintosh the thing like was done to the AppleTV.</p><p>For these reason I am very disappointed in the iPad. The likelihood is that I am wrong and it might have a bright future- as it is it could revolutionize the Medical Industry. And if Apple cuts a deal with Adobe and Microsoft down the line (or HTML5 adoption increases at a brisk pace) then maybe later versions of the device will change everyone's lives and change how we think about computers. But today, as it is today, it is the most underwhelming release of a new Apple product since the AppleTV came out...</p><p>And for that I blame the fact that it was maybe one of the worst kept secrets in Apple's recent history, and for that reason a hype machine began that makes it so that even an incredible life-changing device fails to live up to expectations set for it (aka the PS3 effect)....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the end I do n't think this will be real popular , and it will be the lack of Flash that makes it unpopular- and no HTML5 is not the answer...I am not saying that Flash or Silverlight is superior to HTML5 in any way .
Flash in particular is proprietary junk .
Flash versions for not popular systems ( PowerPC , Linux , etc ) are usually terrible , and playback of Flash requires WAY more CPU use than it should- on an Atom Netbook fullscreen Flash plays poorly in OSX .
I bet Flash on one of these iPads would be super terrible on the 1GHz CPU- Steve Jobs probably considers keeping Flash out of the app store a quality control measure.With that said the appeal of the Netbook market ( which Jobs very blatantly backwards admitted is the competitors to the iPad ) was that consumers could get REAL computers for cheap prices at a low size .
A Netbook is supposed to be more than a gloried Pocket PC- it is a secondary system when you need more power than an Smartphone can provide .
And one of the real barriers that separate a Smartphone and a laptop in 2010 is the ability to use " real " Flash .
Even if all of sites switch over to HTML5 in the next year ( a very optimistic goal considering that fact that IE use is so high ) , is it a guarantee that the iPad can play back the content well ?
Review will soon tell us , and then we will know if this first gen iPad has a promising future or not...Honestly the form factor for the iPad is perfect- anyone with a brain could figure that the natural progression for Netbooks was for them to ditch the keyboards for touchscreens .
Any decent SciFi since the original Star Trek has shown us how important tablet PCs will be in the future.But the current iPad misses that mark by a great deal because it is not a full featured computer .
Is is a bigger Smartphone , with all the limitations of that market.Until an iPad can do everything a laptop can for say a college student ( lacking Flash kills that- my college age sister could n't go a day without her Hulu ) or a business executive ( lacking real Microsoft Office kills that for when you REALLY need Office ) that what you are really looking at is a EXPENSIVE secondary " toy " for a large part of the market that currently buys laptops .
Which is basically the market Netbooks have now ( I will admit for serious work they are a toy ) , but the difference is that a Netbook costs as much as a game console , while a iPad costs as much as a REAL 15inch Windows laptop.I can guess what Apple is thinking- that there is enough apps in the App Store to do everything that most " real " people do with computers .
If someone wants a real computer for something specific then they are advanced enough to shell out the thousand bucks for a real Mac laptop .
But I get the feeling that the iPad is purposefully neutered with a kiddie slope OS to ensure that it does not dig into the Mac Book market .
Ca n't wait to see if people can Hackintosh the thing like was done to the AppleTV.For these reason I am very disappointed in the iPad .
The likelihood is that I am wrong and it might have a bright future- as it is it could revolutionize the Medical Industry .
And if Apple cuts a deal with Adobe and Microsoft down the line ( or HTML5 adoption increases at a brisk pace ) then maybe later versions of the device will change everyone 's lives and change how we think about computers .
But today , as it is today , it is the most underwhelming release of a new Apple product since the AppleTV came out...And for that I blame the fact that it was maybe one of the worst kept secrets in Apple 's recent history , and for that reason a hype machine began that makes it so that even an incredible life-changing device fails to live up to expectations set for it ( aka the PS3 effect ) ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the end I don't think this will be real popular, and it will be the lack of Flash that makes it unpopular- and no HTML5 is not the answer...I am not saying that Flash or Silverlight is superior to HTML5 in any way.
Flash in particular is proprietary junk.
Flash versions for not popular systems (PowerPC, Linux, etc) are usually terrible, and playback of Flash requires WAY more CPU use than it should- on an Atom Netbook fullscreen Flash plays poorly in OSX.
I bet Flash on one of these iPads would be super terrible on the 1GHz CPU- Steve Jobs probably considers keeping Flash out of the app store a quality control measure.With that said the appeal of the Netbook market (which Jobs very blatantly backwards admitted is the competitors to the iPad) was that consumers could get REAL computers for cheap prices at a low size.
A Netbook is supposed to be more than a gloried Pocket PC- it is a secondary system when you need more power than an Smartphone can provide.
And one of the real barriers that separate a Smartphone and a laptop in 2010 is the ability to use "real" Flash.
Even if all of sites switch over to HTML5 in the next year (a very optimistic goal considering that fact that IE use is so high), is it a guarantee that the iPad can play back the content well?
Review will soon tell us, and then we will know if this first gen iPad has a promising future or not...Honestly the form factor for the iPad is perfect- anyone with a brain could figure that the natural progression for Netbooks was for them to ditch the keyboards for touchscreens.
Any decent SciFi since the original Star Trek has shown us how important tablet PCs will be in the future.But the current iPad misses that mark by a great deal because it is not a full featured computer.
Is is a bigger Smartphone, with all the limitations of that market.Until an iPad can do everything a laptop can for say a college student (lacking Flash kills that- my college age sister couldn't go a day without her Hulu) or a business executive (lacking real Microsoft Office kills that for when you REALLY need Office) that what you are really looking at is a EXPENSIVE secondary "toy" for a large part of the market that currently buys laptops.
Which is basically the market Netbooks have now (I will admit for serious work they are a toy), but the difference is that a Netbook costs as much as a game console, while a iPad costs as much as a REAL 15inch Windows laptop.I can guess what Apple is thinking- that there is enough apps in the App Store to do everything that most "real" people do with computers.
If someone wants a real computer for something specific then they are advanced enough to shell out the thousand bucks for a real Mac laptop.
But I get the feeling that the iPad is purposefully neutered with a kiddie slope OS to ensure that it does not dig into the Mac Book market.
Can't wait to see if people can Hackintosh the thing like was done to the AppleTV.For these reason I am very disappointed in the iPad.
The likelihood is that I am wrong and it might have a bright future- as it is it could revolutionize the Medical Industry.
And if Apple cuts a deal with Adobe and Microsoft down the line (or HTML5 adoption increases at a brisk pace) then maybe later versions of the device will change everyone's lives and change how we think about computers.
But today, as it is today, it is the most underwhelming release of a new Apple product since the AppleTV came out...And for that I blame the fact that it was maybe one of the worst kept secrets in Apple's recent history, and for that reason a hype machine began that makes it so that even an incredible life-changing device fails to live up to expectations set for it (aka the PS3 effect)....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928444</id>
	<title>I Hope...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264602480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some other manufacturer is taking notes on all the rumored features, wish lists and left out items and rolls it all together into a nice iWiper!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some other manufacturer is taking notes on all the rumored features , wish lists and left out items and rolls it all together into a nice iWiper !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some other manufacturer is taking notes on all the rumored features, wish lists and left out items and rolls it all together into a nice iWiper!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921490</id>
	<title>Original iPod review</title>
	<author>Wyatt Earp</author>
	<datestamp>1264622400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>/. just should have taken this - <a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/1816257&amp;tid=107" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/1816257&amp;tid=107</a> [slashdot.org] and formed it for iPad.</p><p>With<br>"No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>/ .
just should have taken this - http : //apple.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 01/10/23/1816257&amp;tid = 107 [ slashdot.org ] and formed it for iPad.With " No wireless .
Less space than a nomad .
Lame. "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>/.
just should have taken this - http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/1816257&amp;tid=107 [slashdot.org] and formed it for iPad.With"No wireless.
Less space than a nomad.
Lame."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929278</id>
	<title>Re:Typical techies and gadget freaks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264609920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Very true.</p><p>The iPad isn't a laptop replacement.  It's for the vast majority of people out there who don't WANT the hassle of a laptop.  They just want something that works, and lets them get their email, browse the web, show off photos, download a movie or an ebook<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and some subset of the other 5K or so more specialized things that apps provide.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Very true.The iPad is n't a laptop replacement .
It 's for the vast majority of people out there who do n't WANT the hassle of a laptop .
They just want something that works , and lets them get their email , browse the web , show off photos , download a movie or an ebook ... and some subset of the other 5K or so more specialized things that apps provide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very true.The iPad isn't a laptop replacement.
It's for the vast majority of people out there who don't WANT the hassle of a laptop.
They just want something that works, and lets them get their email, browse the web, show off photos, download a movie or an ebook ... and some subset of the other 5K or so more specialized things that apps provide.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922464</id>
	<title>Re:Pricing announced</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course not.  They fully mean 250Mb. They want people paying them 15 bucks more each month.  Why give you a low cost attractive option?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course not .
They fully mean 250Mb .
They want people paying them 15 bucks more each month .
Why give you a low cost attractive option ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course not.
They fully mean 250Mb.
They want people paying them 15 bucks more each month.
Why give you a low cost attractive option?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922978</id>
	<title>Mac system requirements</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264625700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/" title="apple.com">Apple's tech specs</a> [apple.com] this thing requires OS X 10.5.8 to sync to a Mac, but WinXP is okay for a PC.</p><p>What the hey? I've got an older Mac that syncs fine with my iPod nano; can anyone explain why Apple would alienate all their own OS X 10.4 users?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to Apple 's tech specs [ apple.com ] this thing requires OS X 10.5.8 to sync to a Mac , but WinXP is okay for a PC.What the hey ?
I 've got an older Mac that syncs fine with my iPod nano ; can anyone explain why Apple would alienate all their own OS X 10.4 users ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to Apple's tech specs [apple.com] this thing requires OS X 10.5.8 to sync to a Mac, but WinXP is okay for a PC.What the hey?
I've got an older Mac that syncs fine with my iPod nano; can anyone explain why Apple would alienate all their own OS X 10.4 users?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922950</id>
	<title>Re:Taking Jobs at his word--misquoted</title>
	<author>sribe</author>
	<datestamp>1264625580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was actually "way more intimate than a laptop, way better than a phone"--which makes sense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was actually " way more intimate than a laptop , way better than a phone " --which makes sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was actually "way more intimate than a laptop, way better than a phone"--which makes sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921292</id>
	<title>iTouch on steroids</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a glorified iTouch (not iPhone - there's no phone in it at all unless you count Skype.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a glorified iTouch ( not iPhone - there 's no phone in it at all unless you count Skype .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a glorified iTouch (not iPhone - there's no phone in it at all unless you count Skype.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923530</id>
	<title>Re:time to put "i" names out to pasture</title>
	<author>bughunter</author>
	<datestamp>1264583820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does it have 'wings?'</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it have 'wings ?
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it have 'wings?
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928884</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Cyberllama</author>
	<datestamp>1264605900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the older ones are not the issue, it's the new ones that won't usually stream h.264.  They do the basic low-quality flash stream first, then encode HD and then iPhone versions.  I think iPhone is usually last, so sometimes it takes up to a day after a video is posted before you can watch it on your iPhone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the older ones are not the issue , it 's the new ones that wo n't usually stream h.264 .
They do the basic low-quality flash stream first , then encode HD and then iPhone versions .
I think iPhone is usually last , so sometimes it takes up to a day after a video is posted before you can watch it on your iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the older ones are not the issue, it's the new ones that won't usually stream h.264.
They do the basic low-quality flash stream first, then encode HD and then iPhone versions.
I think iPhone is usually last, so sometimes it takes up to a day after a video is posted before you can watch it on your iPhone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928902</id>
	<title>Re:No stylus eh?</title>
	<author>AiTuDou</author>
	<datestamp>1264606080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you mean handwriting support, you're boned. If you just want a stylus for being a bit more precise:

<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=stylus+for+iphone" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=stylus+for+iphone</a> [google.com]

<a href="http://tenonedesign.com/stylus.php" title="tenonedesign.com" rel="nofollow">http://tenonedesign.com/stylus.php</a> [tenonedesign.com]
<a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/06/diy\_iphone\_stylus.html" title="makezine.com" rel="nofollow">http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/06/diy\_iphone\_stylus.html</a> [makezine.com]

Anything that's conductive (and earthed to you) can be used as a stylus on capacitive screens. My missus has even used a mushroom to type on my N1.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you mean handwriting support , you 're boned .
If you just want a stylus for being a bit more precise : http : //www.google.com/search ? q = stylus + for + iphone [ google.com ] http : //tenonedesign.com/stylus.php [ tenonedesign.com ] http : //blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/06/diy \ _iphone \ _stylus.html [ makezine.com ] Anything that 's conductive ( and earthed to you ) can be used as a stylus on capacitive screens .
My missus has even used a mushroom to type on my N1 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you mean handwriting support, you're boned.
If you just want a stylus for being a bit more precise:

http://www.google.com/search?q=stylus+for+iphone [google.com]

http://tenonedesign.com/stylus.php [tenonedesign.com]
http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/06/diy\_iphone\_stylus.html [makezine.com]

Anything that's conductive (and earthed to you) can be used as a stylus on capacitive screens.
My missus has even used a mushroom to type on my N1.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921876</id>
	<title>Why buy this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264623240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Disappointing, but why am I not surprised?  Why would anyone buy something that is a closed operating system like this?  Give me something that runs OSX, Windows 7, or Linux so I can install software that I want instead of having to buy it from Itunes.  Quit trying to control my content for your profit Apple.  Let me buy what I want from whom I want.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Disappointing , but why am I not surprised ?
Why would anyone buy something that is a closed operating system like this ?
Give me something that runs OSX , Windows 7 , or Linux so I can install software that I want instead of having to buy it from Itunes .
Quit trying to control my content for your profit Apple .
Let me buy what I want from whom I want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disappointing, but why am I not surprised?
Why would anyone buy something that is a closed operating system like this?
Give me something that runs OSX, Windows 7, or Linux so I can install software that I want instead of having to buy it from Itunes.
Quit trying to control my content for your profit Apple.
Let me buy what I want from whom I want.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921378</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1264622220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes.  Whether that is a weakness or a strength depends on what you want, though.  I personally would rather have the tablet than an a Macbook Air.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
Whether that is a weakness or a strength depends on what you want , though .
I personally would rather have the tablet than an a Macbook Air .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
Whether that is a weakness or a strength depends on what you want, though.
I personally would rather have the tablet than an a Macbook Air.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923006</id>
	<title>3G adapter is built in</title>
	<author>nmg196</author>
	<datestamp>1264625760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do nearly all new sites and the slashdot summary all say "no 3G connection built in" when Steve Jobs so clearly talked about the 3G version of the device and even showed a price list of what it would cost?  Have I somehow got the wrong end of the stick? Do you need an external adapter??</p><p><a href="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/apple-creation-0378-rm-eng.jpg" title="blogcdn.com">See here for picture</a> [blogcdn.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do nearly all new sites and the slashdot summary all say " no 3G connection built in " when Steve Jobs so clearly talked about the 3G version of the device and even showed a price list of what it would cost ?
Have I somehow got the wrong end of the stick ?
Do you need an external adapter ?
? See here for picture [ blogcdn.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do nearly all new sites and the slashdot summary all say "no 3G connection built in" when Steve Jobs so clearly talked about the 3G version of the device and even showed a price list of what it would cost?
Have I somehow got the wrong end of the stick?
Do you need an external adapter?
?See here for picture [blogcdn.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923148</id>
	<title>iHype</title>
	<author>slasho81</author>
	<datestamp>1264582920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The amount of superlatives they used this time in the keynote was phenomenal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The amount of superlatives they used this time in the keynote was phenomenal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The amount of superlatives they used this time in the keynote was phenomenal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923198</id>
	<title>Magical + Corner of Technology &amp; Liberal Arts</title>
	<author>Steauengeglase</author>
	<datestamp>1264583040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As an IT worker that sounds like the most horrible place on Earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As an IT worker that sounds like the most horrible place on Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an IT worker that sounds like the most horrible place on Earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927076</id>
	<title>Re:Typical techies and gadget freaks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264594560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't seem to understand the product, the iPad uses the iPhone os and ui, so the software is not new at all.  Which means that the sole reason to buy this product would be on the hardware features.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't seem to understand the product , the iPad uses the iPhone os and ui , so the software is not new at all .
Which means that the sole reason to buy this product would be on the hardware features .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't seem to understand the product, the iPad uses the iPhone os and ui, so the software is not new at all.
Which means that the sole reason to buy this product would be on the hardware features.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926076</id>
	<title>Tech Support Nightmare - Accents</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264591200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So when a guy/gal from Texas calls for tech support on their device how do you tell if they have a problem with their iPad or their iPod?!

*just starts mashing dialpad*</htmltext>
<tokenext>So when a guy/gal from Texas calls for tech support on their device how do you tell if they have a problem with their iPad or their iPod ? !
* just starts mashing dialpad *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So when a guy/gal from Texas calls for tech support on their device how do you tell if they have a problem with their iPad or their iPod?!
*just starts mashing dialpad*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921336</id>
	<title>Like him or loath him</title>
	<author>arcite</author>
	<datestamp>1264622160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Steve Jobs IS a real life wizard of OZ.
<p>
And Apple will sell millions of these things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Steve Jobs IS a real life wizard of OZ .
And Apple will sell millions of these things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Steve Jobs IS a real life wizard of OZ.
And Apple will sell millions of these things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928142</id>
	<title>25 years and it's still wrong?</title>
	<author>Loki\_1929</author>
	<datestamp>1264600440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure I understand, it took them 25 years to "invent" <a href="http://www.seanpercival.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/padd1.gif" title="seanpercival.com">this</a> [seanpercival.com] and it doesn't even have a good spot to grip it like the original did?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure I understand , it took them 25 years to " invent " this [ seanpercival.com ] and it does n't even have a good spot to grip it like the original did ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure I understand, it took them 25 years to "invent" this [seanpercival.com] and it doesn't even have a good spot to grip it like the original did?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923858</id>
	<title>my reaction</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264584660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no keyboard. less space than a netbook. lame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no keyboard .
less space than a netbook .
lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no keyboard.
less space than a netbook.
lame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921884</id>
	<title>Re:Is that the real actual name?</title>
	<author>N1tr0u5</author>
	<datestamp>1264623240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree.</p><p>Also, I don't think New England was considered when they were looking at names.  I'm sure there's a bit of confusion in conversation among Mac enthusiasts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree.Also , I do n't think New England was considered when they were looking at names .
I 'm sure there 's a bit of confusion in conversation among Mac enthusiasts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.Also, I don't think New England was considered when they were looking at names.
I'm sure there's a bit of confusion in conversation among Mac enthusiasts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922708</id>
	<title>Wrong prices...</title>
	<author>denzacar</author>
	<datestamp>1264625040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"So $499 for 16GB of iPad," Jobs explained. "That's our base model. 32GB is $599, 64GB is $799. 3G models cost an extra $130. $629, 729, and 829 with 3G."</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : " So $ 499 for 16GB of iPad , " Jobs explained .
" That 's our base model .
32GB is $ 599 , 64GB is $ 799 .
3G models cost an extra $ 130 .
$ 629 , 729 , and 829 with 3G .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:"So $499 for 16GB of iPad," Jobs explained.
"That's our base model.
32GB is $599, 64GB is $799.
3G models cost an extra $130.
$629, 729, and 829 with 3G.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922292</id>
	<title>Re:3G Data Plans</title>
	<author>flabordec</author>
	<datestamp>1264624080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And a $130 increase in the initial price tag.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And a $ 130 increase in the initial price tag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And a $130 increase in the initial price tag.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925824</id>
	<title>Re:No Flash? No deal, and it's not just youTube</title>
	<author>CxDoo</author>
	<datestamp>1264590420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what do you mean by 'iPad clones'? Slates market is well and alive for many moons, covering a variety of platforms.</p><p>This post brought to you from fully functional Windows 7 on a Fujitsu Siemens ST5031D. Look it up; it is a couple of years old design, and still better spec'd then iPad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what do you mean by 'iPad clones ' ?
Slates market is well and alive for many moons , covering a variety of platforms.This post brought to you from fully functional Windows 7 on a Fujitsu Siemens ST5031D .
Look it up ; it is a couple of years old design , and still better spec 'd then iPad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what do you mean by 'iPad clones'?
Slates market is well and alive for many moons, covering a variety of platforms.This post brought to you from fully functional Windows 7 on a Fujitsu Siemens ST5031D.
Look it up; it is a couple of years old design, and still better spec'd then iPad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924998</id>
	<title>Re:Pros vs Cons</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1264588020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No HD Video (1024x768)</p></div><p>Actually, it does output 720p via a "Dock Connector to VGA adapter <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/" title="apple.com">http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/</a> [apple.com].</p><p>It can even output the video and show something completely different on the unit's on-board display...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No HD Video ( 1024x768 ) Actually , it does output 720p via a " Dock Connector to VGA adapter http : //www.apple.com/ipad/specs/ [ apple.com ] .It can even output the video and show something completely different on the unit 's on-board display.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No HD Video (1024x768)Actually, it does output 720p via a "Dock Connector to VGA adapter http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/ [apple.com].It can even output the video and show something completely different on the unit's on-board display...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923346</id>
	<title>Negatives...</title>
	<author>LeonPierre</author>
	<datestamp>1264583400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Off the top of my head:</p><p>No GPS on WiFi unit (only A-GPS on 3G unit).</p><p>No camera.</p><p>Still no flash on the new processor that "screams".</p><p>And to add speculation:</p><p>I'd wager that AT&amp;T's data plan for it will forbid any VOIP from going through the "unlimited" data plan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Off the top of my head : No GPS on WiFi unit ( only A-GPS on 3G unit ) .No camera.Still no flash on the new processor that " screams " .And to add speculation : I 'd wager that AT&amp;T 's data plan for it will forbid any VOIP from going through the " unlimited " data plan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Off the top of my head:No GPS on WiFi unit (only A-GPS on 3G unit).No camera.Still no flash on the new processor that "screams".And to add speculation:I'd wager that AT&amp;T's data plan for it will forbid any VOIP from going through the "unlimited" data plan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926280</id>
	<title>My review - it will never be a success...</title>
	<author>Darth Snowshoe</author>
	<datestamp>1264591860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This thing is very flat, and it's possible it could very easily get lost in my cluttered apartment.  It has on odd name that could be hard to spell, with a capital later that is placed in an unorthodox location.

It has somewhat sharp edges which could present a danger to very clumsy people.  Also, it's utility is going to be limited for people who are blind, deaf and also have no fingers or toes.  Additionally, it won't work very well for people living underwater.  In places that are very hot, like Venus, or the Sun, its durability is questionable and its battery life would be compromised.   It could present a choking hazard to very large people or hungry bears.  A palette full of them could easily crush someone.  It would probably explode in a microwave oven.

Honestly, I have to wonder what Steve Jobs was thinking when he designed this!   No thanks, Steve, what are you, trying to kill me?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This thing is very flat , and it 's possible it could very easily get lost in my cluttered apartment .
It has on odd name that could be hard to spell , with a capital later that is placed in an unorthodox location .
It has somewhat sharp edges which could present a danger to very clumsy people .
Also , it 's utility is going to be limited for people who are blind , deaf and also have no fingers or toes .
Additionally , it wo n't work very well for people living underwater .
In places that are very hot , like Venus , or the Sun , its durability is questionable and its battery life would be compromised .
It could present a choking hazard to very large people or hungry bears .
A palette full of them could easily crush someone .
It would probably explode in a microwave oven .
Honestly , I have to wonder what Steve Jobs was thinking when he designed this !
No thanks , Steve , what are you , trying to kill me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This thing is very flat, and it's possible it could very easily get lost in my cluttered apartment.
It has on odd name that could be hard to spell, with a capital later that is placed in an unorthodox location.
It has somewhat sharp edges which could present a danger to very clumsy people.
Also, it's utility is going to be limited for people who are blind, deaf and also have no fingers or toes.
Additionally, it won't work very well for people living underwater.
In places that are very hot, like Venus, or the Sun, its durability is questionable and its battery life would be compromised.
It could present a choking hazard to very large people or hungry bears.
A palette full of them could easily crush someone.
It would probably explode in a microwave oven.
Honestly, I have to wonder what Steve Jobs was thinking when he designed this!
No thanks, Steve, what are you, trying to kill me?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926034</id>
	<title>Re:Awkward keyboard usage</title>
	<author>RightSaidFred99</author>
	<datestamp>1264591080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Solid entry and step ahead in what?  Tablets have been around for ages.  Apple has just "invented" them...again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Solid entry and step ahead in what ?
Tablets have been around for ages .
Apple has just " invented " them...again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Solid entry and step ahead in what?
Tablets have been around for ages.
Apple has just "invented" them...again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921844</id>
	<title>What it really needs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264623180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It better have an iGloryHole to expect anyone to buy it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It better have an iGloryHole to expect anyone to buy it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It better have an iGloryHole to expect anyone to buy it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30930552</id>
	<title>We should be CELEBRATING this thing</title>
	<author>hackshack</author>
	<datestamp>1264711440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that, <i>y'all,</i> collectively, are not the target audience for this thing. That said, we should be <i>celebrating,</i> rather than bitching. Here's why.
</p><p>Raise your hands, please: those who've installed LogMeIn on their mothers' computers.
</p><p>LogMeIn is a crutch, and you know it. You know damn well why you installed it, too. It's so you can support her when shit breaks every couple months, or when she can't figure something out.
</p><p>The nice thing about the iPhone OS is that it's <i>tight.</i> My mom had never used a cell phone in her life, and figured out how to make a call with my iPhone in seconds. The OS is like an appliance, reliability-wise. The target audience is users, not the nerd herd, and the interface reflects that. It's basically a $500 ticket to never having to support Mother again (or really any user that "just needs the basics").
</p><p>If you really think it's just a big iPhone, look at the <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/#video" title="apple.com">iPad interface video</a> [apple.com] (from about 1:00 - 3:00). It was the first time I actually was like, <i>holy shit,</i> it looks like one of those futuristic computers out of a Hollywood movie; except it actually makes logical sense, yet retains teh bling. Unlike every other OS, multitouch is "baked in" to the iPhone OS, and you can really see the level of refinement in that video. All that shit that Microsoft wishes it could do with multitouch, this thing actually <i>does</i>.
</p><p>No, it doesn't have multitasking or an OLED display or a webcam or a fucking JTAG header; those people can vote with their ducats and get an HP Slate. Have fun troubleshooting your wireless network in Windows 7 or GNOME using your fingertips. Ugh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm gon na go out on a limb here and say that , y'all , collectively , are not the target audience for this thing .
That said , we should be celebrating , rather than bitching .
Here 's why .
Raise your hands , please : those who 've installed LogMeIn on their mothers ' computers .
LogMeIn is a crutch , and you know it .
You know damn well why you installed it , too .
It 's so you can support her when shit breaks every couple months , or when she ca n't figure something out .
The nice thing about the iPhone OS is that it 's tight .
My mom had never used a cell phone in her life , and figured out how to make a call with my iPhone in seconds .
The OS is like an appliance , reliability-wise .
The target audience is users , not the nerd herd , and the interface reflects that .
It 's basically a $ 500 ticket to never having to support Mother again ( or really any user that " just needs the basics " ) .
If you really think it 's just a big iPhone , look at the iPad interface video [ apple.com ] ( from about 1 : 00 - 3 : 00 ) .
It was the first time I actually was like , holy shit , it looks like one of those futuristic computers out of a Hollywood movie ; except it actually makes logical sense , yet retains teh bling .
Unlike every other OS , multitouch is " baked in " to the iPhone OS , and you can really see the level of refinement in that video .
All that shit that Microsoft wishes it could do with multitouch , this thing actually does .
No , it does n't have multitasking or an OLED display or a webcam or a fucking JTAG header ; those people can vote with their ducats and get an HP Slate .
Have fun troubleshooting your wireless network in Windows 7 or GNOME using your fingertips .
Ugh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that, y'all, collectively, are not the target audience for this thing.
That said, we should be celebrating, rather than bitching.
Here's why.
Raise your hands, please: those who've installed LogMeIn on their mothers' computers.
LogMeIn is a crutch, and you know it.
You know damn well why you installed it, too.
It's so you can support her when shit breaks every couple months, or when she can't figure something out.
The nice thing about the iPhone OS is that it's tight.
My mom had never used a cell phone in her life, and figured out how to make a call with my iPhone in seconds.
The OS is like an appliance, reliability-wise.
The target audience is users, not the nerd herd, and the interface reflects that.
It's basically a $500 ticket to never having to support Mother again (or really any user that "just needs the basics").
If you really think it's just a big iPhone, look at the iPad interface video [apple.com] (from about 1:00 - 3:00).
It was the first time I actually was like, holy shit, it looks like one of those futuristic computers out of a Hollywood movie; except it actually makes logical sense, yet retains teh bling.
Unlike every other OS, multitouch is "baked in" to the iPhone OS, and you can really see the level of refinement in that video.
All that shit that Microsoft wishes it could do with multitouch, this thing actually does.
No, it doesn't have multitasking or an OLED display or a webcam or a fucking JTAG header; those people can vote with their ducats and get an HP Slate.
Have fun troubleshooting your wireless network in Windows 7 or GNOME using your fingertips.
Ugh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228</id>
	<title>No flash support</title>
	<author>vivek7006</author>
	<datestamp>1264621920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which means no hulu.com, espn360.com or fancast.com. Somehow Mr. Jobs is touting this as a feature.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which means no hulu.com , espn360.com or fancast.com .
Somehow Mr. Jobs is touting this as a feature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which means no hulu.com, espn360.com or fancast.com.
Somehow Mr. Jobs is touting this as a feature.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30932356</id>
	<title>It will sell...and people will buy it</title>
	<author>Danathar</author>
	<datestamp>1264689480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Despite what every pundit and slashdot anti-apple (or even pro apple) people say. It will sell. It will sell in crazy numbers.</p><p>It does not matter that it does not have flash, USB, ethernet, etc.</p><p>It will sell.</p><p>Why? Because of Apple's reputation among consumers.</p><p>And those sites that use flash or silverlight or java will make their site iPad compatible if they want those customers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Despite what every pundit and slashdot anti-apple ( or even pro apple ) people say .
It will sell .
It will sell in crazy numbers.It does not matter that it does not have flash , USB , ethernet , etc.It will sell.Why ?
Because of Apple 's reputation among consumers.And those sites that use flash or silverlight or java will make their site iPad compatible if they want those customers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Despite what every pundit and slashdot anti-apple (or even pro apple) people say.
It will sell.
It will sell in crazy numbers.It does not matter that it does not have flash, USB, ethernet, etc.It will sell.Why?
Because of Apple's reputation among consumers.And those sites that use flash or silverlight or java will make their site iPad compatible if they want those customers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929894</id>
	<title>Re:The iPad is a Platform</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264616700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>A platform that plays exactly none of my DvD rips.... PS3 needs "main profile level 4.0"(i'm using High Profile level 4.1), this thing needs "Main profile level 3.0" Actually thats my complaint with the whole of H264 land... you get to say "Plays H264 videos" with out specifying which parts you support. My phone(nokia 5310) plays H246 videos as well, 480x320 base profile level 2.0 or some shit like that. Anyways it can go to hell until i can run linux or OSX on it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A platform that plays exactly none of my DvD rips.... PS3 needs " main profile level 4.0 " ( i 'm using High Profile level 4.1 ) , this thing needs " Main profile level 3.0 " Actually thats my complaint with the whole of H264 land... you get to say " Plays H264 videos " with out specifying which parts you support .
My phone ( nokia 5310 ) plays H246 videos as well , 480x320 base profile level 2.0 or some shit like that .
Anyways it can go to hell until i can run linux or OSX on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A platform that plays exactly none of my DvD rips.... PS3 needs "main profile level 4.0"(i'm using High Profile level 4.1), this thing needs "Main profile level 3.0" Actually thats my complaint with the whole of H264 land... you get to say "Plays H264 videos" with out specifying which parts you support.
My phone(nokia 5310) plays H246 videos as well, 480x320 base profile level 2.0 or some shit like that.
Anyways it can go to hell until i can run linux or OSX on it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923840</id>
	<title>Big ass iPod Touch - I don't think so</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1264584600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is truly just a big ass iPod Touch and just as closed up as an iPod so no flash, no Java, no choice. Just lots of pretty colours for guys in turtle neck sweaters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is truly just a big ass iPod Touch and just as closed up as an iPod so no flash , no Java , no choice .
Just lots of pretty colours for guys in turtle neck sweaters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is truly just a big ass iPod Touch and just as closed up as an iPod so no flash, no Java, no choice.
Just lots of pretty colours for guys in turtle neck sweaters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922054</id>
	<title>Prices</title>
	<author>MilesTails</author>
	<datestamp>1264623540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Basic Model is $499. Wow, was not expecting that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Basic Model is $ 499 .
Wow , was not expecting that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Basic Model is $499.
Wow, was not expecting that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931866</id>
	<title>Can we use it for sidetalking</title>
	<author>mousse-man</author>
	<datestamp>1264685220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The device looks like a prime candidate for <a href="http://www.sidetalkin.com/" title="sidetalkin.com">sidetalking</a> [sidetalkin.com], at least to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The device looks like a prime candidate for sidetalking [ sidetalkin.com ] , at least to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The device looks like a prime candidate for sidetalking [sidetalkin.com], at least to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923022</id>
	<title>Re:It has 3G.</title>
	<author>slimjim8094</author>
	<datestamp>1264625820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We largely skipped UMTS over here and went straight to HSPA. That's what people in the US mean when they say 3G (except for Verizon, which is closer to 2.5g)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We largely skipped UMTS over here and went straight to HSPA .
That 's what people in the US mean when they say 3G ( except for Verizon , which is closer to 2.5g )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We largely skipped UMTS over here and went straight to HSPA.
That's what people in the US mean when they say 3G (except for Verizon, which is closer to 2.5g)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924930</id>
	<title>Re:3G Data Plans</title>
	<author>GraZZ</author>
	<datestamp>1264587780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bring them to Canada please!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bring them to Canada please !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bring them to Canada please!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924564</id>
	<title>Re:3G Data Plans</title>
	<author>theantipop</author>
	<datestamp>1264586760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm hoping there will be some way to rig up the sim on my phone to use a contractless $30/month data plan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm hoping there will be some way to rig up the sim on my phone to use a contractless $ 30/month data plan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm hoping there will be some way to rig up the sim on my phone to use a contractless $30/month data plan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924638</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>I Am Defragged</author>
	<datestamp>1264586940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You can use ClickToFlash on Safari in 10.6 to tell the Youtube site to serve the H.264 iPhone version to your browser instead of the flash version too - much nicer.</p></div><p>Not just the iPhone version, but all the way up to 720p if it's available (I believe it's the video the flash player serves you when you append <tt>&amp;fmt=22</tt> to the URL, if that still works).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can use ClickToFlash on Safari in 10.6 to tell the Youtube site to serve the H.264 iPhone version to your browser instead of the flash version too - much nicer.Not just the iPhone version , but all the way up to 720p if it 's available ( I believe it 's the video the flash player serves you when you append &amp;fmt = 22 to the URL , if that still works ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can use ClickToFlash on Safari in 10.6 to tell the Youtube site to serve the H.264 iPhone version to your browser instead of the flash version too - much nicer.Not just the iPhone version, but all the way up to 720p if it's available (I believe it's the video the flash player serves you when you append &amp;fmt=22 to the URL, if that still works).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924268</id>
	<title>Re:The iPad is a Platform</title>
	<author>autophile</author>
	<datestamp>1264585860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The iPad can run iPhone apps, and the SDK is available now. App developers will be falling over each other to be first with new apps taking advantage of the larger screen.</p></div></blockquote><p>Isn't it the case that yes, the SDK is available, but you would still have to go through the app store to get your app into the hands of The People? And that means jumping through the Apple app store hoops?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The iPad can run iPhone apps , and the SDK is available now .
App developers will be falling over each other to be first with new apps taking advantage of the larger screen.Is n't it the case that yes , the SDK is available , but you would still have to go through the app store to get your app into the hands of The People ?
And that means jumping through the Apple app store hoops ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iPad can run iPhone apps, and the SDK is available now.
App developers will be falling over each other to be first with new apps taking advantage of the larger screen.Isn't it the case that yes, the SDK is available, but you would still have to go through the app store to get your app into the hands of The People?
And that means jumping through the Apple app store hoops?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927632</id>
	<title>What a let-down...</title>
	<author>davevr</author>
	<datestamp>1264597320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why didn't they just call it the iPhone DX?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did n't they just call it the iPhone DX ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why didn't they just call it the iPhone DX?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921850</id>
	<title>RAM? Resolution? Price?</title>
	<author>alexandre</author>
	<datestamp>1264623180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where are the real specs?<br>Are they afraid?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where are the real specs ? Are they afraid ?
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where are the real specs?Are they afraid?
:P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921328</id>
	<title>Is that the real actual name?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ipad?? That sounds retarded... seriously. Even the Islate is better than that</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ipad ? ?
That sounds retarded... seriously. Even the Islate is better than that</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ipad??
That sounds retarded... seriously. Even the Islate is better than that</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921352</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bingo.  This is a huge problem.  Will Adobe even be invited on board to write a plugin?  Apple should have sorted this out before releasing this.  Even my Nokia E71 supports Flash, for God's sake.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bingo .
This is a huge problem .
Will Adobe even be invited on board to write a plugin ?
Apple should have sorted this out before releasing this .
Even my Nokia E71 supports Flash , for God 's sake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bingo.
This is a huge problem.
Will Adobe even be invited on board to write a plugin?
Apple should have sorted this out before releasing this.
Even my Nokia E71 supports Flash, for God's sake.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922060</id>
	<title>time to put "i" names out to pasture</title>
	<author>logicassasin</author>
	<datestamp>1264623600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean, really though... they couldn't come up with a better name??? iPad sounds like digital Kotex...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , really though... they could n't come up with a better name ? ? ?
iPad sounds like digital Kotex.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, really though... they couldn't come up with a better name???
iPad sounds like digital Kotex...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924200</id>
	<title>Enough about apple for fucks sakes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264585620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look, I'll openly admit that I'm an Apple fanboy.  I like my MBP, I like my iPhone.</p><p>But do we really fucking need a 'rumor round up' post, followed 4 hours later with a post about the rumored product, BEFORE they even fucking tell you about it?</p><p>What are we going to do tomorrow? Have a round up of who got the rumors wrong or right, and a 'why the ipad will fail' discussion for the anti-apple fanboys?</p><p>Timothy-</p><p>When you're in such a hurry to post a story that you can't wait 15 minutes to get the actual details, then you need to see a doctor.  I like to get the latest info quick, but pretty much everyone would rather get it correct 15 minutes later, rather than have to come back later to get the actual facts because you were in such a big hurry to get the Frost Piss.</p><p>News for Nerd.</p><p>Not: Speculation for the idiots with no patients.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look , I 'll openly admit that I 'm an Apple fanboy .
I like my MBP , I like my iPhone.But do we really fucking need a 'rumor round up ' post , followed 4 hours later with a post about the rumored product , BEFORE they even fucking tell you about it ? What are we going to do tomorrow ?
Have a round up of who got the rumors wrong or right , and a 'why the ipad will fail ' discussion for the anti-apple fanboys ? Timothy-When you 're in such a hurry to post a story that you ca n't wait 15 minutes to get the actual details , then you need to see a doctor .
I like to get the latest info quick , but pretty much everyone would rather get it correct 15 minutes later , rather than have to come back later to get the actual facts because you were in such a big hurry to get the Frost Piss.News for Nerd.Not : Speculation for the idiots with no patients .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look, I'll openly admit that I'm an Apple fanboy.
I like my MBP, I like my iPhone.But do we really fucking need a 'rumor round up' post, followed 4 hours later with a post about the rumored product, BEFORE they even fucking tell you about it?What are we going to do tomorrow?
Have a round up of who got the rumors wrong or right, and a 'why the ipad will fail' discussion for the anti-apple fanboys?Timothy-When you're in such a hurry to post a story that you can't wait 15 minutes to get the actual details, then you need to see a doctor.
I like to get the latest info quick, but pretty much everyone would rather get it correct 15 minutes later, rather than have to come back later to get the actual facts because you were in such a big hurry to get the Frost Piss.News for Nerd.Not: Speculation for the idiots with no patients.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922394</id>
	<title>Re:3G Data Plans</title>
	<author>mdm-adph</author>
	<datestamp>1264624320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot the most important part -- they're all contract free.  Gotta admit that's pretty neat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot the most important part -- they 're all contract free .
Got ta admit that 's pretty neat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot the most important part -- they're all contract free.
Gotta admit that's pretty neat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925816</id>
	<title>big...</title>
	<author>Demerara</author>
	<datestamp>1264590360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>....yawn.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>....yawn.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....yawn.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924762</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264587240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think its quite an apt name, finally an apple product that sounds to be of good use to the fannies that buy the overpriced crap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think its quite an apt name , finally an apple product that sounds to be of good use to the fannies that buy the overpriced crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think its quite an apt name, finally an apple product that sounds to be of good use to the fannies that buy the overpriced crap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927050</id>
	<title>Re:Phenomenal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264594380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So why don't you take your existing PC or phone and turn it any which ever way you like. See how it works when you're about to go to sleep. Or when you're just waking up and a bit late for your train but still want to check mail for urgent stuff. Or when you've had a few too many beers and are lying on the floor and just feel obliged to check your mail before you pass out.</p><p>Or when you need the keyboard fast. I mean fast - like now! No time to fiddle with tethering, unfolding and all that balls - I just want it now.</p><p>Or when you're talking to a lady, out in the garden, and all of a sudden this massively romantic memory of yours says - play that thing on the ipad/pod/slate whatever. Of course, you geeks wouldn't really know about that, would you?.... see, I didn't even leave the QM out...l</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So why do n't you take your existing PC or phone and turn it any which ever way you like .
See how it works when you 're about to go to sleep .
Or when you 're just waking up and a bit late for your train but still want to check mail for urgent stuff .
Or when you 've had a few too many beers and are lying on the floor and just feel obliged to check your mail before you pass out.Or when you need the keyboard fast .
I mean fast - like now !
No time to fiddle with tethering , unfolding and all that balls - I just want it now.Or when you 're talking to a lady , out in the garden , and all of a sudden this massively romantic memory of yours says - play that thing on the ipad/pod/slate whatever .
Of course , you geeks would n't really know about that , would you ? ... .
see , I did n't even leave the QM out...l</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So why don't you take your existing PC or phone and turn it any which ever way you like.
See how it works when you're about to go to sleep.
Or when you're just waking up and a bit late for your train but still want to check mail for urgent stuff.
Or when you've had a few too many beers and are lying on the floor and just feel obliged to check your mail before you pass out.Or when you need the keyboard fast.
I mean fast - like now!
No time to fiddle with tethering, unfolding and all that balls - I just want it now.Or when you're talking to a lady, out in the garden, and all of a sudden this massively romantic memory of yours says - play that thing on the ipad/pod/slate whatever.
Of course, you geeks wouldn't really know about that, would you?....
see, I didn't even leave the QM out...l</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924120</id>
	<title>With that weak processor?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264585380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, Jobs won't allow his new baby to stutter, and multi-tasking is just asking for a less brilliant user experience. 1GHz on an ARM is going to be necessarily limited in horsepower, and dividing that between several apps is going to lead to poor input response. Besides, he doesn't want to hear you complaining that your 10 hour iPad only lasts for 2 hours because you left your folding-at-home app running in the background.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p><p>I'm kind of amazed it doesn't have a gps. Google maps is going to suck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , Jobs wo n't allow his new baby to stutter , and multi-tasking is just asking for a less brilliant user experience .
1GHz on an ARM is going to be necessarily limited in horsepower , and dividing that between several apps is going to lead to poor input response .
Besides , he does n't want to hear you complaining that your 10 hour iPad only lasts for 2 hours because you left your folding-at-home app running in the background .
: - ) I 'm kind of amazed it does n't have a gps .
Google maps is going to suck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, Jobs won't allow his new baby to stutter, and multi-tasking is just asking for a less brilliant user experience.
1GHz on an ARM is going to be necessarily limited in horsepower, and dividing that between several apps is going to lead to poor input response.
Besides, he doesn't want to hear you complaining that your 10 hour iPad only lasts for 2 hours because you left your folding-at-home app running in the background.
:-)I'm kind of amazed it doesn't have a gps.
Google maps is going to suck.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922688</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig</title>
	<author>LordKronos</author>
	<datestamp>1264624980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering how much it is like the iPhone, I'm really disappointed that you can't use it as a phone. It had serious <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=sidetalking" title="google.com">sidetalking</a> [google.com] potential.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering how much it is like the iPhone , I 'm really disappointed that you ca n't use it as a phone .
It had serious sidetalking [ google.com ] potential .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering how much it is like the iPhone, I'm really disappointed that you can't use it as a phone.
It had serious sidetalking [google.com] potential.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921730</id>
	<title>beowulf?</title>
	<author>achten</author>
	<datestamp>1264622940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922582</id>
	<title>Re:Taking Jobs at his word</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1264624740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because I want an oversized phone and a slow limited laptop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because I want an oversized phone and a slow limited laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because I want an oversized phone and a slow limited laptop.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921386</id>
	<title>Please tell me I can remove the battery</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm guessing they kept some of the worst features of the iphone, such as lack of flash support (mentioned above) no memory expandability, proprietary USB cable, no user replaceable battery, etc.....its all going to depend on the price...$1,000?  No way.  $3-400?  I could see having one or 2 of those laying around the house.  But I'm just not getting the same "gotta have it" feeling as when they unveiled the iphone.  Oh well....at least its shiny<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing they kept some of the worst features of the iphone , such as lack of flash support ( mentioned above ) no memory expandability , proprietary USB cable , no user replaceable battery , etc.....its all going to depend on the price... $ 1,000 ?
No way .
$ 3-400 ? I could see having one or 2 of those laying around the house .
But I 'm just not getting the same " got ta have it " feeling as when they unveiled the iphone .
Oh well....at least its shiny : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing they kept some of the worst features of the iphone, such as lack of flash support (mentioned above) no memory expandability, proprietary USB cable, no user replaceable battery, etc.....its all going to depend on the price...$1,000?
No way.
$3-400?  I could see having one or 2 of those laying around the house.
But I'm just not getting the same "gotta have it" feeling as when they unveiled the iphone.
Oh well....at least its shiny :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922014</id>
	<title>Re:No WCMDA/HSPA or even CDMA/EVDO is a huge miss</title>
	<author>Professor\_UNIX</author>
	<datestamp>1264623480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're just impatient and didn't wait for the thing to finish.  It supports 3G with AT&amp;T... $30/month unlimited, no contract, fully unlocked.  If this thing supports VOIP via 3G I could ditch my iPhone.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're just impatient and did n't wait for the thing to finish .
It supports 3G with AT&amp;T... $ 30/month unlimited , no contract , fully unlocked .
If this thing supports VOIP via 3G I could ditch my iPhone .
: -/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're just impatient and didn't wait for the thing to finish.
It supports 3G with AT&amp;T... $30/month unlimited, no contract, fully unlocked.
If this thing supports VOIP via 3G I could ditch my iPhone.
:-/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925556</id>
	<title>Re:The iPad is a Platform</title>
	<author>mako1138</author>
	<datestamp>1264589700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, I think the iPad will be attractive to normal folks. It certainly gives a prospective netbook buyer something to think about.</p><p>Like you, I don't like closed platforms. The iPad is pretty and would be fun to play with, but I can't see myself getting one until it gets jailbroken.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I think the iPad will be attractive to normal folks .
It certainly gives a prospective netbook buyer something to think about.Like you , I do n't like closed platforms .
The iPad is pretty and would be fun to play with , but I ca n't see myself getting one until it gets jailbroken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I think the iPad will be attractive to normal folks.
It certainly gives a prospective netbook buyer something to think about.Like you, I don't like closed platforms.
The iPad is pretty and would be fun to play with, but I can't see myself getting one until it gets jailbroken.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928650</id>
	<title>an observation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264604160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It tickles me how each story i've read about it so far tout it as being super fast, while at the same time acknowledging it can only do \_one\_ thing at a time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It tickles me how each story i 've read about it so far tout it as being super fast , while at the same time acknowledging it can only do \ _one \ _ thing at a time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It tickles me how each story i've read about it so far tout it as being super fast, while at the same time acknowledging it can only do \_one\_ thing at a time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922540</id>
	<title>Played with my first iPod Touch a month ago . . .</title>
	<author>OnTheEdge</author>
	<datestamp>1264624620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>... and my first thought was, damn - I wish this screen was bigger. Plus as much as I despise the iTunes store (for numerous reasons), especially loaded on a PC, accessing it over the iPod Touch directly, wasn't so bad. It will be interesting to see how this thing takes off.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and my first thought was , damn - I wish this screen was bigger .
Plus as much as I despise the iTunes store ( for numerous reasons ) , especially loaded on a PC , accessing it over the iPod Touch directly , was n't so bad .
It will be interesting to see how this thing takes off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and my first thought was, damn - I wish this screen was bigger.
Plus as much as I despise the iTunes store (for numerous reasons), especially loaded on a PC, accessing it over the iPod Touch directly, wasn't so bad.
It will be interesting to see how this thing takes off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921904</id>
	<title>Re:Awkward keyboard usage</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1264623300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're assuming you'd ever use this at a desk without some form of external keyboard.  I can see something like this sliding into a dock that holds it at a comfortable viewing angle and having a separate keyboard and some form of pointing device (mouse, trackpad, wacom, whatever) for desktop use.</p><p>That is, of course, assuming you want to use a device like this as both your go-everywhere oversized iPod Touch and your underpowered, small-screened desktop.  However, a lot of people will make pretty serious compromises to consolidate to one device that can do everything they want.</p><p>More likely, this is targeted for doing what my wife does with her iPod Touch - checking her Facebook, surfing the web, typing up short emails, etc while sitting in bed or on the couch.  For desktop stuff, we have a desktop computer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're assuming you 'd ever use this at a desk without some form of external keyboard .
I can see something like this sliding into a dock that holds it at a comfortable viewing angle and having a separate keyboard and some form of pointing device ( mouse , trackpad , wacom , whatever ) for desktop use.That is , of course , assuming you want to use a device like this as both your go-everywhere oversized iPod Touch and your underpowered , small-screened desktop .
However , a lot of people will make pretty serious compromises to consolidate to one device that can do everything they want.More likely , this is targeted for doing what my wife does with her iPod Touch - checking her Facebook , surfing the web , typing up short emails , etc while sitting in bed or on the couch .
For desktop stuff , we have a desktop computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're assuming you'd ever use this at a desk without some form of external keyboard.
I can see something like this sliding into a dock that holds it at a comfortable viewing angle and having a separate keyboard and some form of pointing device (mouse, trackpad, wacom, whatever) for desktop use.That is, of course, assuming you want to use a device like this as both your go-everywhere oversized iPod Touch and your underpowered, small-screened desktop.
However, a lot of people will make pretty serious compromises to consolidate to one device that can do everything they want.More likely, this is targeted for doing what my wife does with her iPod Touch - checking her Facebook, surfing the web, typing up short emails, etc while sitting in bed or on the couch.
For desktop stuff, we have a desktop computer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922114</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1264623660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It's more than just an iPod touch that won't fit in your pocket...it's also an underpowered netbook with no keyboard. It's the worst of both worlds!</i></p><p>Steve Jobs will be releasing the new iPants in the next couple of months. The iPants have iPockets that will fit an iPad. If you don't own a pair you won't be iCool anymore, so better save up those iPennies.</p><p>Apple has always released crippled products and insisted that they were superior. You had to wait till iPhone 3.0 to have MMS and buy a 3rd party app (not available at release) to record video. These are things that have been standard in phones for 5 years. Apple's genius is not the product, it's the marketing which seems to catch out every wannabe geek and fashion victim.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's more than just an iPod touch that wo n't fit in your pocket...it 's also an underpowered netbook with no keyboard .
It 's the worst of both worlds ! Steve Jobs will be releasing the new iPants in the next couple of months .
The iPants have iPockets that will fit an iPad .
If you do n't own a pair you wo n't be iCool anymore , so better save up those iPennies.Apple has always released crippled products and insisted that they were superior .
You had to wait till iPhone 3.0 to have MMS and buy a 3rd party app ( not available at release ) to record video .
These are things that have been standard in phones for 5 years .
Apple 's genius is not the product , it 's the marketing which seems to catch out every wannabe geek and fashion victim .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's more than just an iPod touch that won't fit in your pocket...it's also an underpowered netbook with no keyboard.
It's the worst of both worlds!Steve Jobs will be releasing the new iPants in the next couple of months.
The iPants have iPockets that will fit an iPad.
If you don't own a pair you won't be iCool anymore, so better save up those iPennies.Apple has always released crippled products and insisted that they were superior.
You had to wait till iPhone 3.0 to have MMS and buy a 3rd party app (not available at release) to record video.
These are things that have been standard in phones for 5 years.
Apple's genius is not the product, it's the marketing which seems to catch out every wannabe geek and fashion victim.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925514</id>
	<title>Re:Backlit and eyestrain</title>
	<author>venicebeach</author>
	<datestamp>1264589580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When did everyone become such a wimp about looking at LCD screens? <br> <br>
I mean, how much time each day does any self-respecting Slashdot reader spend <i>not</i> looking a backlit screen?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When did everyone become such a wimp about looking at LCD screens ?
I mean , how much time each day does any self-respecting Slashdot reader spend not looking a backlit screen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When did everyone become such a wimp about looking at LCD screens?
I mean, how much time each day does any self-respecting Slashdot reader spend not looking a backlit screen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926958</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264594020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>  So help me god this thing better have multitasking</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
God doesn't care if it has multitasking. He just sits in a cloud, waiting for
you to make a mistake...and then KAPOW, off you go to the hot place.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So help me god this thing better have multitasking God does n't care if it has multitasking .
He just sits in a cloud , waiting for you to make a mistake...and then KAPOW , off you go to the hot place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  So help me god this thing better have multitasking

God doesn't care if it has multitasking.
He just sits in a cloud, waiting for
you to make a mistake...and then KAPOW, off you go to the hot place.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925028</id>
	<title>Re:time to put "i" names out to pasture</title>
	<author>codeAlDente</author>
	<datestamp>1264588140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Rejected names include iMaxi and iPon. Maybe when the 7 inch version comes out...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rejected names include iMaxi and iPon .
Maybe when the 7 inch version comes out.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rejected names include iMaxi and iPon.
Maybe when the 7 inch version comes out...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925272</id>
	<title>Re:is late</title>
	<author>Theaetetus</author>
	<datestamp>1264588860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>What was wrong with the oft-rumored "iSlate" moniker?</p></div><p>"Ip ad" doesn't mean anything in English. "Is late" meant Duke Nukem Forever for several years.</p></div><p>Touche... I also figured it was the fact that, while cool, "iSlate" is awkward to say due to the transition between the 'eye' and the 'sssla". Ends up sounding more like "ice-late".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What was wrong with the oft-rumored " iSlate " moniker ?
" Ip ad " does n't mean anything in English .
" Is late " meant Duke Nukem Forever for several years.Touche... I also figured it was the fact that , while cool , " iSlate " is awkward to say due to the transition between the 'eye ' and the 'sssla " .
Ends up sounding more like " ice-late " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What was wrong with the oft-rumored "iSlate" moniker?
"Ip ad" doesn't mean anything in English.
"Is late" meant Duke Nukem Forever for several years.Touche... I also figured it was the fact that, while cool, "iSlate" is awkward to say due to the transition between the 'eye' and the 'sssla".
Ends up sounding more like "ice-late".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928412</id>
	<title>Re:Is that the real actual name?</title>
	<author>rxan</author>
	<datestamp>1264602180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>She doesn't need the iPad because she iSlate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>She does n't need the iPad because she iSlate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She doesn't need the iPad because she iSlate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924242</id>
	<title>Oh Slashdot</title>
	<author>Prien715</author>
	<datestamp>1264585800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember similair comments when Nintendo announced the Wii.</p><p>Remember how that went?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember similair comments when Nintendo announced the Wii.Remember how that went ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember similair comments when Nintendo announced the Wii.Remember how that went?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30942998</id>
	<title>Re:Pros vs Cons</title>
	<author>docbrody</author>
	<datestamp>1264679580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>turns out it has a Mic so thats off the list of cons.  ALSO I forgot to include AT&amp;T as a major con - should have been first on the list</htmltext>
<tokenext>turns out it has a Mic so thats off the list of cons .
ALSO I forgot to include AT&amp;T as a major con - should have been first on the list</tokentext>
<sentencetext>turns out it has a Mic so thats off the list of cons.
ALSO I forgot to include AT&amp;T as a major con - should have been first on the list</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929388</id>
	<title>Re:Apple A4</title>
	<author>indiechild</author>
	<datestamp>1264611240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm intrigued by this chip as well, I think it might be a lot more powerful than it looks. Should be interesting to see benchmarks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm intrigued by this chip as well , I think it might be a lot more powerful than it looks .
Should be interesting to see benchmarks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm intrigued by this chip as well, I think it might be a lot more powerful than it looks.
Should be interesting to see benchmarks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922432</id>
	<title>Re:Pricing announced</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Surely they mean 250Mb/month.  Their so-called unlimited plan is capped at 5Gb/month.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Surely they mean 250Mb/month .
Their so-called unlimited plan is capped at 5Gb/month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surely they mean 250Mb/month.
Their so-called unlimited plan is capped at 5Gb/month.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>onefriedrice</author>
	<datestamp>1264623240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Will Adobe even be invited on board to write a plugin?</p></div><p>Hopefully not.  I don't know of any products with worse security records than Acrobat Reader and Flash.  It's time for Flash to just go away.  Fortunately, unlike FF, Safari does support h.264 which will surely be supported by hulu et al. eventually.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will Adobe even be invited on board to write a plugin ? Hopefully not .
I do n't know of any products with worse security records than Acrobat Reader and Flash .
It 's time for Flash to just go away .
Fortunately , unlike FF , Safari does support h.264 which will surely be supported by hulu et al .
eventually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will Adobe even be invited on board to write a plugin?Hopefully not.
I don't know of any products with worse security records than Acrobat Reader and Flash.
It's time for Flash to just go away.
Fortunately, unlike FF, Safari does support h.264 which will surely be supported by hulu et al.
eventually.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922574</id>
	<title>Not for me.</title>
	<author>B5\_geek</author>
	<datestamp>1264624740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not a Nokia N900.<br>You need iTunes to use it.</p><p>I am tired of my gear owning me.  DRM that makes it hard for me to use what I bought.  Cell phone companies crippleing the hardware and then 'selling' you the features at a higher cost.  Operating Systems that assume I am an idiot and don't let me get at the guts to configure it the way I WANT IT!</p><p>No thank-you.  I am getting off this roller-coaster.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not a Nokia N900.You need iTunes to use it.I am tired of my gear owning me .
DRM that makes it hard for me to use what I bought .
Cell phone companies crippleing the hardware and then 'selling ' you the features at a higher cost .
Operating Systems that assume I am an idiot and do n't let me get at the guts to configure it the way I WANT IT ! No thank-you .
I am getting off this roller-coaster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not a Nokia N900.You need iTunes to use it.I am tired of my gear owning me.
DRM that makes it hard for me to use what I bought.
Cell phone companies crippleing the hardware and then 'selling' you the features at a higher cost.
Operating Systems that assume I am an idiot and don't let me get at the guts to configure it the way I WANT IT!No thank-you.
I am getting off this roller-coaster.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922720</id>
	<title>They killed their own baby.</title>
	<author>foo fighter</author>
	<datestamp>1264625100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This thing kills the MacBook Air.</p><p>On the other hand, I guess we now know Apple's premium for running an unlocked operating system. (iPad: $500, MacBook Air: $1500; you do the math)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This thing kills the MacBook Air.On the other hand , I guess we now know Apple 's premium for running an unlocked operating system .
( iPad : $ 500 , MacBook Air : $ 1500 ; you do the math )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This thing kills the MacBook Air.On the other hand, I guess we now know Apple's premium for running an unlocked operating system.
(iPad: $500, MacBook Air: $1500; you do the math)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924572</id>
	<title>Re:underpowered?</title>
	<author>ArcherB</author>
	<datestamp>1264586760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It actually has a robust power source; it is powered almost entirely by the user's sense of self-importance.</p></div><p>So, it runs on smug?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It actually has a robust power source ; it is powered almost entirely by the user 's sense of self-importance.So , it runs on smug ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It actually has a robust power source; it is powered almost entirely by the user's sense of self-importance.So, it runs on smug?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925208</id>
	<title>panel native resolution?</title>
	<author>aquabat</author>
	<datestamp>1264588620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>anyone see a spec for the panel they're using in this thing? type/resolution/depth/response etc...</htmltext>
<tokenext>anyone see a spec for the panel they 're using in this thing ?
type/resolution/depth/response etc.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>anyone see a spec for the panel they're using in this thing?
type/resolution/depth/response etc...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924004</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264585080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>What an unfortunate name.</p></div><p>Just wait until Apple partners with Sprint next year and releases the WiMax iPad.</p></div><p>It's bleeding-edge technology, regardless.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What an unfortunate name.Just wait until Apple partners with Sprint next year and releases the WiMax iPad.It 's bleeding-edge technology , regardless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What an unfortunate name.Just wait until Apple partners with Sprint next year and releases the WiMax iPad.It's bleeding-edge technology, regardless.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925374</id>
	<title>Important question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264589220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will it play World of Warcraft?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it play World of Warcraft ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it play World of Warcraft?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922904</id>
	<title>But there is an option for 3G - unlocked at that</title>
	<author>Dasher42</author>
	<datestamp>1264625520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why are so many outlets reporting no 3G?  It's optional, it's using GSM micro-SIM, it's unlocked.  Oy.  It's all over the place at <a href="http://live.gdgt.com/2010/01/27/live-apple-come-see-our-latest-creation-tablet-event-coverage/" title="gdgt.com">sites like this</a> [gdgt.com].  Don't jump the gun!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are so many outlets reporting no 3G ?
It 's optional , it 's using GSM micro-SIM , it 's unlocked .
Oy. It 's all over the place at sites like this [ gdgt.com ] .
Do n't jump the gun !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why are so many outlets reporting no 3G?
It's optional, it's using GSM micro-SIM, it's unlocked.
Oy.  It's all over the place at sites like this [gdgt.com].
Don't jump the gun!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921732</id>
	<title>A4...</title>
	<author>Singularity42</author>
	<datestamp>1264622940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's some form of ARM, right?  When is someone going to do something cool that isn't ARM or x86?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's some form of ARM , right ?
When is someone going to do something cool that is n't ARM or x86 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's some form of ARM, right?
When is someone going to do something cool that isn't ARM or x86?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929444</id>
	<title>Re:Apple A4</title>
	<author>gwdoiron</author>
	<datestamp>1264612020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok, so now I'm curious... what's so special about *this* low-power low-performance (fixed that for you) non-x86 ARM chipset that differentiates itself from the horde of other low-power low-performance non-x86 ARM chipsets?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , so now I 'm curious... what 's so special about * this * low-power low-performance ( fixed that for you ) non-x86 ARM chipset that differentiates itself from the horde of other low-power low-performance non-x86 ARM chipsets ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, so now I'm curious... what's so special about *this* low-power low-performance (fixed that for you) non-x86 ARM chipset that differentiates itself from the horde of other low-power low-performance non-x86 ARM chipsets?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926974</id>
	<title>Marble</title>
	<author>donstenk</author>
	<datestamp>1264594080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice toy.</p><p>Is the OS a preview of Marble, what with all the dark task bars and so?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice toy.Is the OS a preview of Marble , what with all the dark task bars and so ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice toy.Is the OS a preview of Marble, what with all the dark task bars and so?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921916</id>
	<title>Re:No WCMDA/HSPA or even CDMA/EVDO is a huge miss</title>
	<author>mdm-adph</author>
	<datestamp>1264623300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eh -- looks like it might have built-in cellular, anyway.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eh -- looks like it might have built-in cellular , anyway .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eh -- looks like it might have built-in cellular, anyway.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30970512</id>
	<title>Enewspapers and Emagazines could save the planet</title>
	<author>awalker76</author>
	<datestamp>1264954860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here is an article that talks about some amazing possibilities for the iPad. I for one think that this is a great thing and if it is used and marketed properly it can mean huge strides toward green living and environmental friendliness for everyone.
Read the article here <a href="http://hubpages.com/hub/Daily-E-Newspapers-and-E-Magazines-for-Apple-iPad-or-eBook-Readers" title="hubpages.com" rel="nofollow">http://hubpages.com/hub/Daily-E-Newspapers-and-E-Magazines-for-Apple-iPad-or-eBook-Readers</a> [hubpages.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is an article that talks about some amazing possibilities for the iPad .
I for one think that this is a great thing and if it is used and marketed properly it can mean huge strides toward green living and environmental friendliness for everyone .
Read the article here http : //hubpages.com/hub/Daily-E-Newspapers-and-E-Magazines-for-Apple-iPad-or-eBook-Readers [ hubpages.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is an article that talks about some amazing possibilities for the iPad.
I for one think that this is a great thing and if it is used and marketed properly it can mean huge strides toward green living and environmental friendliness for everyone.
Read the article here http://hubpages.com/hub/Daily-E-Newspapers-and-E-Magazines-for-Apple-iPad-or-eBook-Readers [hubpages.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921818</id>
	<title>What an IRip</title>
	<author>parallel\_prankster</author>
	<datestamp>1264623120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It literally looks like a giant IPhone.
This is an ISlap to the IPeople.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It literally looks like a giant IPhone .
This is an ISlap to the IPeople .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It literally looks like a giant IPhone.
This is an ISlap to the IPeople.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922938</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't Create a Need</title>
	<author>dougman</author>
	<datestamp>1264625580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're right - it doesn't create a need. I fills a need.</p><p>My wife and kids spend 95\% of their time on our laptop surfing the web, watching movies, emailing, etc. While our PowerBook is tiny compared to the laptops of the mid-90's, they are still relatively big and get very warm on your lap. Batteries seem to need charging on a regular basis. A PowerBook costs a lot. I can see this being a device that each member of the family could have (and I could afford). While not everything Apple touches turns to gold (Apple TV comes to mind), I believe this will be a winner.</p><p>There's going to be some amazing apps for this. I would love one in the kitchen. A laptop takes up counter space. This thing can sit in the cookbook holder as geek cooks have imagined for years. Play some music, pull up your recipe, can be a slideshow picture frame when not in use... You know there will be some great accessories for this. I predict a picture frame dock that hangs on the wall. It can recharge and show photos in style.</p><p>With regards to the Kindle... would you really take a grayscale eBook reader with a text browser (yay Lynx!) for $489 or an iPad with HD resolution, Safari, email, iphoto, itunes, 140K apps, etc., etc., for $499? The Kindle is marginally smaller and may have one or two very minor benefits for book readers, but c'mon... really?</p><p>If the iPad delivers on performance/battery life, this is a winner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right - it does n't create a need .
I fills a need.My wife and kids spend 95 \ % of their time on our laptop surfing the web , watching movies , emailing , etc .
While our PowerBook is tiny compared to the laptops of the mid-90 's , they are still relatively big and get very warm on your lap .
Batteries seem to need charging on a regular basis .
A PowerBook costs a lot .
I can see this being a device that each member of the family could have ( and I could afford ) .
While not everything Apple touches turns to gold ( Apple TV comes to mind ) , I believe this will be a winner.There 's going to be some amazing apps for this .
I would love one in the kitchen .
A laptop takes up counter space .
This thing can sit in the cookbook holder as geek cooks have imagined for years .
Play some music , pull up your recipe , can be a slideshow picture frame when not in use... You know there will be some great accessories for this .
I predict a picture frame dock that hangs on the wall .
It can recharge and show photos in style.With regards to the Kindle... would you really take a grayscale eBook reader with a text browser ( yay Lynx !
) for $ 489 or an iPad with HD resolution , Safari , email , iphoto , itunes , 140K apps , etc. , etc. , for $ 499 ?
The Kindle is marginally smaller and may have one or two very minor benefits for book readers , but c'mon... really ? If the iPad delivers on performance/battery life , this is a winner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right - it doesn't create a need.
I fills a need.My wife and kids spend 95\% of their time on our laptop surfing the web, watching movies, emailing, etc.
While our PowerBook is tiny compared to the laptops of the mid-90's, they are still relatively big and get very warm on your lap.
Batteries seem to need charging on a regular basis.
A PowerBook costs a lot.
I can see this being a device that each member of the family could have (and I could afford).
While not everything Apple touches turns to gold (Apple TV comes to mind), I believe this will be a winner.There's going to be some amazing apps for this.
I would love one in the kitchen.
A laptop takes up counter space.
This thing can sit in the cookbook holder as geek cooks have imagined for years.
Play some music, pull up your recipe, can be a slideshow picture frame when not in use... You know there will be some great accessories for this.
I predict a picture frame dock that hangs on the wall.
It can recharge and show photos in style.With regards to the Kindle... would you really take a grayscale eBook reader with a text browser (yay Lynx!
) for $489 or an iPad with HD resolution, Safari, email, iphoto, itunes, 140K apps, etc., etc., for $499?
The Kindle is marginally smaller and may have one or two very minor benefits for book readers, but c'mon... really?If the iPad delivers on performance/battery life, this is a winner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922424</id>
	<title>Microsoft needs to swallow its pride and ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... ship Office for this thing. If Microsoft were in pursuit of profits rather than illegal market domination, they would have been there at the creation of a brilliant evolutionary turn in the way we use computing devices.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... ship Office for this thing .
If Microsoft were in pursuit of profits rather than illegal market domination , they would have been there at the creation of a brilliant evolutionary turn in the way we use computing devices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... ship Office for this thing.
If Microsoft were in pursuit of profits rather than illegal market domination, they would have been there at the creation of a brilliant evolutionary turn in the way we use computing devices.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921426</id>
	<title>iPhad</title>
	<author>ddebrito</author>
	<datestamp>1264622280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Phirst iPost!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Phirst iPost !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Phirst iPost!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922518</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1264624620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I assume you mean the QuickTime player because h.264 is just an encoding method, not a content player. Flash Player 9 supports h.264</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I assume you mean the QuickTime player because h.264 is just an encoding method , not a content player .
Flash Player 9 supports h.264</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assume you mean the QuickTime player because h.264 is just an encoding method, not a content player.
Flash Player 9 supports h.264</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927690</id>
	<title>Apple A4</title>
	<author>No. 24601</author>
	<datestamp>1264597740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, I'm a bit disappointed<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  Yes, with the iPad a bit, but more so with the idea that this is Slashdot and barely anyone has thrown a spotlight on the Apple A4.  This is an ARM, high performance, low power CPU with integrated graphics, and more importantly the first piece of processing silicon coming out of Cupertino.  Regardless of how much i like the Intel Atom, i think this will be a viable competitor on the ARM front.  Too bad it is under lock and key with the iPhone OS<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , I 'm a bit disappointed : ) Yes , with the iPad a bit , but more so with the idea that this is Slashdot and barely anyone has thrown a spotlight on the Apple A4 .
This is an ARM , high performance , low power CPU with integrated graphics , and more importantly the first piece of processing silicon coming out of Cupertino .
Regardless of how much i like the Intel Atom , i think this will be a viable competitor on the ARM front .
Too bad it is under lock and key with the iPhone OS : p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, I'm a bit disappointed :)  Yes, with the iPad a bit, but more so with the idea that this is Slashdot and barely anyone has thrown a spotlight on the Apple A4.
This is an ARM, high performance, low power CPU with integrated graphics, and more importantly the first piece of processing silicon coming out of Cupertino.
Regardless of how much i like the Intel Atom, i think this will be a viable competitor on the ARM front.
Too bad it is under lock and key with the iPhone OS :p</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927316</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>M. Baranczak</author>
	<datestamp>1264595580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"iPad" is the Bostonian pronunciation of iPod.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" iPad " is the Bostonian pronunciation of iPod .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"iPad" is the Bostonian pronunciation of iPod.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929956</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>evanspw</author>
	<datestamp>1264617300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slate is a pretty horrible word (so is tablet). I imagine Jobs just screaming "no no no", and maybe firing someone just for fun at suggesting one of those. I though it would be iNote, with iPad a distant second choice. I guess they thought iNote would confuse people with notebooks, or hurt their notebook sales, so iPad it is (not withstanding tampon jokes). And they do want to convery the sense it a product between the iphone and the imac notebooks, so a pad kinda fits that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slate is a pretty horrible word ( so is tablet ) .
I imagine Jobs just screaming " no no no " , and maybe firing someone just for fun at suggesting one of those .
I though it would be iNote , with iPad a distant second choice .
I guess they thought iNote would confuse people with notebooks , or hurt their notebook sales , so iPad it is ( not withstanding tampon jokes ) .
And they do want to convery the sense it a product between the iphone and the imac notebooks , so a pad kinda fits that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slate is a pretty horrible word (so is tablet).
I imagine Jobs just screaming "no no no", and maybe firing someone just for fun at suggesting one of those.
I though it would be iNote, with iPad a distant second choice.
I guess they thought iNote would confuse people with notebooks, or hurt their notebook sales, so iPad it is (not withstanding tampon jokes).
And they do want to convery the sense it a product between the iphone and the imac notebooks, so a pad kinda fits that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929492</id>
	<title>Re:Something the world DIDN'T need...</title>
	<author>lazyforker</author>
	<datestamp>1264612380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Asus is thicker and heavier. This matters to me when I'm trying to read on the subway or in bed; or when I'm sitting on the sofa. At the moment I use a netbook or an older 15" laptop for casual websurfing or remote control of my htpc - this device would be a book/newspaper, remote control, web browser and casual gaming toy all in one. I don't see myself using iWork on it though - that seems more like a gimmick to me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Asus is thicker and heavier .
This matters to me when I 'm trying to read on the subway or in bed ; or when I 'm sitting on the sofa .
At the moment I use a netbook or an older 15 " laptop for casual websurfing or remote control of my htpc - this device would be a book/newspaper , remote control , web browser and casual gaming toy all in one .
I do n't see myself using iWork on it though - that seems more like a gimmick to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Asus is thicker and heavier.
This matters to me when I'm trying to read on the subway or in bed; or when I'm sitting on the sofa.
At the moment I use a netbook or an older 15" laptop for casual websurfing or remote control of my htpc - this device would be a book/newspaper, remote control, web browser and casual gaming toy all in one.
I don't see myself using iWork on it though - that seems more like a gimmick to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096</id>
	<title>Pricing announced</title>
	<author>garg0yle</author>
	<datestamp>1264623600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unit is to start at $499 for 8Gb, $599 for 16Gb, or $699 for 32Gb models<br>3G enabled units $130 more</p><p>Data plans (with AT&amp;T) are 250Mb/month for $14.99 (surely they mean Gb?), or unlimited for $29.99</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unit is to start at $ 499 for 8Gb , $ 599 for 16Gb , or $ 699 for 32Gb models3G enabled units $ 130 moreData plans ( with AT&amp;T ) are 250Mb/month for $ 14.99 ( surely they mean Gb ?
) , or unlimited for $ 29.99</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unit is to start at $499 for 8Gb, $599 for 16Gb, or $699 for 32Gb models3G enabled units $130 moreData plans (with AT&amp;T) are 250Mb/month for $14.99 (surely they mean Gb?
), or unlimited for $29.99</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921656</id>
	<title>Slate this!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes! It's not called iSlate - Ballmer' going be throwing chairs at this one. Not only does<br>he look like he's been manipulated, it's also shown MS up to be even more of a bunch<br>of iWannaBe's than we ever realised.</p><p>And it's using Apple's own CPU - so no Windows running on this puppy I guess,<br>but it does give Apple more leverage for locking it down<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes !
It 's not called iSlate - Ballmer ' going be throwing chairs at this one .
Not only doeshe look like he 's been manipulated , it 's also shown MS up to be even more of a bunchof iWannaBe 's than we ever realised.And it 's using Apple 's own CPU - so no Windows running on this puppy I guess,but it does give Apple more leverage for locking it down .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes!
It's not called iSlate - Ballmer' going be throwing chairs at this one.
Not only doeshe look like he's been manipulated, it's also shown MS up to be even more of a bunchof iWannaBe's than we ever realised.And it's using Apple's own CPU - so no Windows running on this puppy I guess,but it does give Apple more leverage for locking it down ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929362</id>
	<title>Re:No stylus eh?</title>
	<author>RazorSharp</author>
	<datestamp>1264610820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, it's one of those special touch screens that only reacts to fingers. It's programmed to reject little plastic sticks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , it 's one of those special touch screens that only reacts to fingers .
It 's programmed to reject little plastic sticks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, it's one of those special touch screens that only reacts to fingers.
It's programmed to reject little plastic sticks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931396</id>
	<title>is there...</title>
	<author>alobar72</author>
	<datestamp>1264678380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>..a website where the unfullfilled hopes and prognosis regarding the Apple tablet are collected ?
I want to post that link, when rumors about an iCar, an iHouse, or an iWife come up<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>..a website where the unfullfilled hopes and prognosis regarding the Apple tablet are collected ?
I want to post that link , when rumors about an iCar , an iHouse , or an iWife come up : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..a website where the unfullfilled hopes and prognosis regarding the Apple tablet are collected ?
I want to post that link, when rumors about an iCar, an iHouse, or an iWife come up :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922994</id>
	<title>just don't drop it</title>
	<author>sucati</author>
	<datestamp>1264625760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>what's the over/under on days until you drop it and it explodes into pieces</htmltext>
<tokenext>what 's the over/under on days until you drop it and it explodes into pieces</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what's the over/under on days until you drop it and it explodes into pieces</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302</id>
	<title>No WCMDA/HSPA or even CDMA/EVDO is a huge miss</title>
	<author>Mindjiver</author>
	<datestamp>1264622040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can you claim to be making a mobile device if it does not have mobile broadband? This thing yearning for a mobile internet connection so bad. The only reason that I can think of is that Steve is waiting to deploy this on Verizon's coming LTE network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can you claim to be making a mobile device if it does not have mobile broadband ?
This thing yearning for a mobile internet connection so bad .
The only reason that I can think of is that Steve is waiting to deploy this on Verizon 's coming LTE network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can you claim to be making a mobile device if it does not have mobile broadband?
This thing yearning for a mobile internet connection so bad.
The only reason that I can think of is that Steve is waiting to deploy this on Verizon's coming LTE network.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928420</id>
	<title>Re:is late</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264602240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>I</b>ntellectual <b>P</b>roperty <b>Ad</b>vertising</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Intellectual Property Advertising</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Intellectual Property Advertising</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928644</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264604100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, it doesn't.</p><p>But Apple designed it that way, so that must be how we want it, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , it does n't.But Apple designed it that way , so that must be how we want it , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, it doesn't.But Apple designed it that way, so that must be how we want it, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927322</id>
	<title>Re:Typical techies and gadget freaks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264595640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are You kidding me.  You think that the software is the problem?  Just go back a few days days to this Article (http://gizmodo.com/5452501/the-apple-tablet-interface-must-be-like-this) highlighted by slashdot on just how innovative the iPod Touch interface really is.  The touch screen form factor lets the developer completely customize the interface to do exactly what the applicaiton needs done, without the baggage from any extra or unnecessary buttons it doesn't need.  As other posters have pointed out, the software just works well and is intuitive for the average consumer user.</p><p>Anyone claiming that this device won't be a huge hit just needs to wait and see</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are You kidding me .
You think that the software is the problem ?
Just go back a few days days to this Article ( http : //gizmodo.com/5452501/the-apple-tablet-interface-must-be-like-this ) highlighted by slashdot on just how innovative the iPod Touch interface really is .
The touch screen form factor lets the developer completely customize the interface to do exactly what the applicaiton needs done , without the baggage from any extra or unnecessary buttons it does n't need .
As other posters have pointed out , the software just works well and is intuitive for the average consumer user.Anyone claiming that this device wo n't be a huge hit just needs to wait and see</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are You kidding me.
You think that the software is the problem?
Just go back a few days days to this Article (http://gizmodo.com/5452501/the-apple-tablet-interface-must-be-like-this) highlighted by slashdot on just how innovative the iPod Touch interface really is.
The touch screen form factor lets the developer completely customize the interface to do exactly what the applicaiton needs done, without the baggage from any extra or unnecessary buttons it doesn't need.
As other posters have pointed out, the software just works well and is intuitive for the average consumer user.Anyone claiming that this device won't be a huge hit just needs to wait and see</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921908</id>
	<title>Error in the article</title>
	<author>garg0yle</author>
	<datestamp>1264623300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"There will be models with 3G support" according to Steve Jobs, so saying that it doesn't support 3G is just a bit, um, wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" There will be models with 3G support " according to Steve Jobs , so saying that it does n't support 3G is just a bit , um , wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"There will be models with 3G support" according to Steve Jobs, so saying that it doesn't support 3G is just a bit, um, wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922838</id>
	<title>32Gb?!</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1264625340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's more space than a Nomad!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's more space than a Nomad ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's more space than a Nomad!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924706</id>
	<title>Skype ap over wifi?</title>
	<author>SlideGuitar</author>
	<datestamp>1264587060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if you could run a skype ap over wifi?  Just saw this: <a href="http://www.skype.com/intl/en/download/skype/iphone/" title="skype.com">http://www.skype.com/intl/en/download/skype/iphone/</a> [skype.com]  I assume it would work on speaker.  Bluetooth headset option?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if you could run a skype ap over wifi ?
Just saw this : http : //www.skype.com/intl/en/download/skype/iphone/ [ skype.com ] I assume it would work on speaker .
Bluetooth headset option ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if you could run a skype ap over wifi?
Just saw this: http://www.skype.com/intl/en/download/skype/iphone/ [skype.com]  I assume it would work on speaker.
Bluetooth headset option?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924982</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig</title>
	<author>witort</author>
	<datestamp>1264587960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wireless. More space than a Nomad. Still lame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wireless .
More space than a Nomad .
Still lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wireless.
More space than a Nomad.
Still lame.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922466</id>
	<title>http://www.apple.com/ipad/</title>
	<author>Singularity42</author>
	<datestamp>1264624500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not seeing it on the front page, but it's all up here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not seeing it on the front page , but it 's all up here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not seeing it on the front page, but it's all up here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922388</id>
	<title>Re:No 3g?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There will be 3g models available 30 days after the non-3g models are available.  Not sure where Slashdot is getting its information.  http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/27/live-from-the-apple-tablet-latest-creation-event/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There will be 3g models available 30 days after the non-3g models are available .
Not sure where Slashdot is getting its information .
http : //www.engadget.com/2010/01/27/live-from-the-apple-tablet-latest-creation-event/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There will be 3g models available 30 days after the non-3g models are available.
Not sure where Slashdot is getting its information.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/27/live-from-the-apple-tablet-latest-creation-event/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925720</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264590120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't.</p><p>Hear that? That's the sound of Steve Jobs trolling EVERYBODY.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't.Hear that ?
That 's the sound of Steve Jobs trolling EVERYBODY .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't.Hear that?
That's the sound of Steve Jobs trolling EVERYBODY.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926412</id>
	<title>Re:Taking Jobs at his word</title>
	<author>gnasher719</author>
	<datestamp>1264592280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So Apple is basically saying that we should stop buying MacBooks and iPhones?</p></div><p>No. Apple is saying we should stop buying netbooks. And laptops running Windows. But mostly netbooks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So Apple is basically saying that we should stop buying MacBooks and iPhones ? No .
Apple is saying we should stop buying netbooks .
And laptops running Windows .
But mostly netbooks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Apple is basically saying that we should stop buying MacBooks and iPhones?No.
Apple is saying we should stop buying netbooks.
And laptops running Windows.
But mostly netbooks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927284</id>
	<title>Apple Acquires iRobot</title>
	<author>microbee</author>
	<datestamp>1264595460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>CUPERTINO, Calif. - January 26th - Just one day before its much speculated debut of the new tablet product, Apple announced that it has reached a definitive agreement to acquire iRobot, a Bedford, MA based company that specilizes in home robots known as Roomba/Scooba.</p><p>"iRobot is a very cool company. Just imagine what can be done when two very cool companies come together." Said Tim Cook, Apple's COO. He said the company's name, iRobot, was also a reason why Apple wanted to acquire it. Tim went on to say that Apple is planning to integrate iRobot's software so that users can monitor and control their Roombas from Mac or iPhone through Bluetooth. "It will be revolutionary on how people clean their homes. It will be fun. And you no longer need the physical virtual walls. They will be obsolete. You will be able to see the map of your house and tell your robot exactly how you want it to clean. You will be able to place a virtual wall by just clicking your mouse or tapping your screen."</p><p>But that's not all. Apple is also planning to improve the product itself. "One thing I always hear people complain about Roomba is that it cannot get under furniture with very low opennings. We will fix that. We will introduce a new Roomba as thin as a Mac Air. It will be the thinnest vacuum in the world." Said Tim. He dodged the question where this thin vacuum would store the dust.</p><p>Apple is also planning to change the existing brand names of Roomba and Scooba. "We will rebrand those names to make them more like Apple. We will call them 'iSuck' and 'iWet'." He told us those names were hand-picked by Steve Jobs himself.</p><p>Other features include:<br>* The robot will be running OS X<br>* The iSuck will be available in two capacities. $699.99 for a smaller capacity (cleans 3 rooms) and $799.99 for a bigger capacity (cleans 4 rooms).<br>* Apple will sell a soft cover for the robot for $29.99.<br>* The battery of the robot is not replaceable.<br>* The robot will not have any hard buttons other than the Home button in the middle.</p><p>Apple's acquisition of iRobot marks a historical moment that Apple is entering the small home appliance market. What's next? An Apple microwave that can play mp3? Or an Apple coffee maker that can download the latest recipes from iTunes? Only time can tell, but the news has stired tremendous excitement in the Apple community.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CUPERTINO , Calif. - January 26th - Just one day before its much speculated debut of the new tablet product , Apple announced that it has reached a definitive agreement to acquire iRobot , a Bedford , MA based company that specilizes in home robots known as Roomba/Scooba .
" iRobot is a very cool company .
Just imagine what can be done when two very cool companies come together .
" Said Tim Cook , Apple 's COO .
He said the company 's name , iRobot , was also a reason why Apple wanted to acquire it .
Tim went on to say that Apple is planning to integrate iRobot 's software so that users can monitor and control their Roombas from Mac or iPhone through Bluetooth .
" It will be revolutionary on how people clean their homes .
It will be fun .
And you no longer need the physical virtual walls .
They will be obsolete .
You will be able to see the map of your house and tell your robot exactly how you want it to clean .
You will be able to place a virtual wall by just clicking your mouse or tapping your screen .
" But that 's not all .
Apple is also planning to improve the product itself .
" One thing I always hear people complain about Roomba is that it can not get under furniture with very low opennings .
We will fix that .
We will introduce a new Roomba as thin as a Mac Air .
It will be the thinnest vacuum in the world .
" Said Tim .
He dodged the question where this thin vacuum would store the dust.Apple is also planning to change the existing brand names of Roomba and Scooba .
" We will rebrand those names to make them more like Apple .
We will call them 'iSuck ' and 'iWet' .
" He told us those names were hand-picked by Steve Jobs himself.Other features include : * The robot will be running OS X * The iSuck will be available in two capacities .
$ 699.99 for a smaller capacity ( cleans 3 rooms ) and $ 799.99 for a bigger capacity ( cleans 4 rooms ) .
* Apple will sell a soft cover for the robot for $ 29.99 .
* The battery of the robot is not replaceable .
* The robot will not have any hard buttons other than the Home button in the middle.Apple 's acquisition of iRobot marks a historical moment that Apple is entering the small home appliance market .
What 's next ?
An Apple microwave that can play mp3 ?
Or an Apple coffee maker that can download the latest recipes from iTunes ?
Only time can tell , but the news has stired tremendous excitement in the Apple community .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CUPERTINO, Calif. - January 26th - Just one day before its much speculated debut of the new tablet product, Apple announced that it has reached a definitive agreement to acquire iRobot, a Bedford, MA based company that specilizes in home robots known as Roomba/Scooba.
"iRobot is a very cool company.
Just imagine what can be done when two very cool companies come together.
" Said Tim Cook, Apple's COO.
He said the company's name, iRobot, was also a reason why Apple wanted to acquire it.
Tim went on to say that Apple is planning to integrate iRobot's software so that users can monitor and control their Roombas from Mac or iPhone through Bluetooth.
"It will be revolutionary on how people clean their homes.
It will be fun.
And you no longer need the physical virtual walls.
They will be obsolete.
You will be able to see the map of your house and tell your robot exactly how you want it to clean.
You will be able to place a virtual wall by just clicking your mouse or tapping your screen.
"But that's not all.
Apple is also planning to improve the product itself.
"One thing I always hear people complain about Roomba is that it cannot get under furniture with very low opennings.
We will fix that.
We will introduce a new Roomba as thin as a Mac Air.
It will be the thinnest vacuum in the world.
" Said Tim.
He dodged the question where this thin vacuum would store the dust.Apple is also planning to change the existing brand names of Roomba and Scooba.
"We will rebrand those names to make them more like Apple.
We will call them 'iSuck' and 'iWet'.
" He told us those names were hand-picked by Steve Jobs himself.Other features include:* The robot will be running OS X* The iSuck will be available in two capacities.
$699.99 for a smaller capacity (cleans 3 rooms) and $799.99 for a bigger capacity (cleans 4 rooms).
* Apple will sell a soft cover for the robot for $29.99.
* The battery of the robot is not replaceable.
* The robot will not have any hard buttons other than the Home button in the middle.Apple's acquisition of iRobot marks a historical moment that Apple is entering the small home appliance market.
What's next?
An Apple microwave that can play mp3?
Or an Apple coffee maker that can download the latest recipes from iTunes?
Only time can tell, but the news has stired tremendous excitement in the Apple community.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926186</id>
	<title>iPad</title>
	<author>odin84gk</author>
	<datestamp>1264591560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Makes you wonder if they got the name from Star Trek's data pad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Makes you wonder if they got the name from Star Trek 's data pad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Makes you wonder if they got the name from Star Trek's data pad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922912</id>
	<title>Re:It has 3G.</title>
	<author>quadelirus</author>
	<datestamp>1264625520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unfortunately the telcos have some kind of oligopoly here and they aren't looking at giving us better service OR better prices any time soon. $29.99 is pretty good for unlimited. The real catch is that in 6 months AT&amp;T will say that there Unlimited users are using too much bandwidth and its unfair to poor AT&amp;T and will try to charge them more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately the telcos have some kind of oligopoly here and they are n't looking at giving us better service OR better prices any time soon .
$ 29.99 is pretty good for unlimited .
The real catch is that in 6 months AT&amp;T will say that there Unlimited users are using too much bandwidth and its unfair to poor AT&amp;T and will try to charge them more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately the telcos have some kind of oligopoly here and they aren't looking at giving us better service OR better prices any time soon.
$29.99 is pretty good for unlimited.
The real catch is that in 6 months AT&amp;T will say that there Unlimited users are using too much bandwidth and its unfair to poor AT&amp;T and will try to charge them more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926330</id>
	<title>Re:Phenomenal</title>
	<author>broken\_chaos</author>
	<datestamp>1264592040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>You can turn it any way you want.</p></div><p>Good god, you mean I can pick the thing up and actually turn it? I'm so excited I'm about to soil myself! Will Apple innovations never cease?</p></div><p>Yes, you can only turn your iPod or iPhone (I say 'your' because you must have one, otherwise you don't exist) in three directions and have the screen rotate. This adds a full fourth direction (not a half of a direction!) so it's 1/4th better already!</p><p>And that seeing the whole page thing? Well, you can only see like, 1/4th of a page on your iPod or iPhone, so that's where the other 3/4ths come from, making this 100\% better than your iPod or iPhone -- so you need to go buy it, now!</p><p>(...Note: Post may contain large amounts of sarcasm. Do not take with alcohol.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can turn it any way you want.Good god , you mean I can pick the thing up and actually turn it ?
I 'm so excited I 'm about to soil myself !
Will Apple innovations never cease ? Yes , you can only turn your iPod or iPhone ( I say 'your ' because you must have one , otherwise you do n't exist ) in three directions and have the screen rotate .
This adds a full fourth direction ( not a half of a direction !
) so it 's 1/4th better already ! And that seeing the whole page thing ?
Well , you can only see like , 1/4th of a page on your iPod or iPhone , so that 's where the other 3/4ths come from , making this 100 \ % better than your iPod or iPhone -- so you need to go buy it , now !
( ...Note : Post may contain large amounts of sarcasm .
Do not take with alcohol .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can turn it any way you want.Good god, you mean I can pick the thing up and actually turn it?
I'm so excited I'm about to soil myself!
Will Apple innovations never cease?Yes, you can only turn your iPod or iPhone (I say 'your' because you must have one, otherwise you don't exist) in three directions and have the screen rotate.
This adds a full fourth direction (not a half of a direction!
) so it's 1/4th better already!And that seeing the whole page thing?
Well, you can only see like, 1/4th of a page on your iPod or iPhone, so that's where the other 3/4ths come from, making this 100\% better than your iPod or iPhone -- so you need to go buy it, now!
(...Note: Post may contain large amounts of sarcasm.
Do not take with alcohol.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931510</id>
	<title>Re:With that weak processor?</title>
	<author>jesser</author>
	<datestamp>1264679580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'm kind of amazed it doesn't have a gps. Google maps is going to suck.</p></div></blockquote><p>According to <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/" title="apple.com">the ipad specs page</a> [apple.com], the models with 3G will have AGPS.  Which kinda makes sense -- AGPS relies on the cell network, and having location information without being able to accept maps isn't very useful.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm kind of amazed it does n't have a gps .
Google maps is going to suck.According to the ipad specs page [ apple.com ] , the models with 3G will have AGPS .
Which kinda makes sense -- AGPS relies on the cell network , and having location information without being able to accept maps is n't very useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm kind of amazed it doesn't have a gps.
Google maps is going to suck.According to the ipad specs page [apple.com], the models with 3G will have AGPS.
Which kinda makes sense -- AGPS relies on the cell network, and having location information without being able to accept maps isn't very useful.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921450</id>
	<title>Coughcough.</title>
	<author>mattcsn</author>
	<datestamp>1264622340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1489848&amp;cid=30551222" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Four out of six for sure</a> [slashdot.org]. I'm just waiting to see what the price is, and if it's usable without the usual itunes umbilical.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Four out of six for sure [ slashdot.org ] .
I 'm just waiting to see what the price is , and if it 's usable without the usual itunes umbilical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Four out of six for sure [slashdot.org].
I'm just waiting to see what the price is, and if it's usable without the usual itunes umbilical.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923992</id>
	<title>You want the version with the Unobtainium screen</title>
	<author>itsdapead</author>
	<datestamp>1264585020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I may still get a Kindle because of this reason.</p></div><p>...and that's probably a good choice if <b>all</b> you ever want to do with it is read black and white ebooks page-by-page - because current e-ink screens may be beautifully clear but they have refresh times measured in seconds, making them unusable for most other purposes.

</p><p>Yes, there are better technologies in the pipeline. I'm sure Apple is watching them carefully - but you can't use last month's new screen technology in a product that's going into production this month.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I may still get a Kindle because of this reason....and that 's probably a good choice if all you ever want to do with it is read black and white ebooks page-by-page - because current e-ink screens may be beautifully clear but they have refresh times measured in seconds , making them unusable for most other purposes .
Yes , there are better technologies in the pipeline .
I 'm sure Apple is watching them carefully - but you ca n't use last month 's new screen technology in a product that 's going into production this month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I may still get a Kindle because of this reason....and that's probably a good choice if all you ever want to do with it is read black and white ebooks page-by-page - because current e-ink screens may be beautifully clear but they have refresh times measured in seconds, making them unusable for most other purposes.
Yes, there are better technologies in the pipeline.
I'm sure Apple is watching them carefully - but you can't use last month's new screen technology in a product that's going into production this month.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922320</id>
	<title>Price</title>
	<author>geoffrobinson</author>
	<datestamp>1264624200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>$499 to $699</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 499 to $ 699</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$499 to $699</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925178</id>
	<title>Excellent for me</title>
	<author>k2r</author>
	<datestamp>1264588560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's an excellent device for me.<br>It will do 80\% of what I usually carry my 4(?) yo MacBook-Pro and my eBook-Reader for.<br>I will be able to leave both at the hotel or at home and do most of the stuff on the iPad / the customers machines and if I really need the power I can still Remote Desktop to one of my company's machines.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's an excellent device for me.It will do 80 \ % of what I usually carry my 4 ( ?
) yo MacBook-Pro and my eBook-Reader for.I will be able to leave both at the hotel or at home and do most of the stuff on the iPad / the customers machines and if I really need the power I can still Remote Desktop to one of my company 's machines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's an excellent device for me.It will do 80\% of what I usually carry my 4(?
) yo MacBook-Pro and my eBook-Reader for.I will be able to leave both at the hotel or at home and do most of the stuff on the iPad / the customers machines and if I really need the power I can still Remote Desktop to one of my company's machines.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923590</id>
	<title>Re:Taking Jobs at his word</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264584000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where I can see this working (for me) is the use of reading. Be it comics or online books (Safari online / Books 24x7).</p><p>If iPhone apps work on it, all the better. If I need to do serious typing then I will just use my computer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where I can see this working ( for me ) is the use of reading .
Be it comics or online books ( Safari online / Books 24x7 ) .If iPhone apps work on it , all the better .
If I need to do serious typing then I will just use my computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where I can see this working (for me) is the use of reading.
Be it comics or online books (Safari online / Books 24x7).If iPhone apps work on it, all the better.
If I need to do serious typing then I will just use my computer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924250</id>
	<title>Re:Awkward keyboard usage</title>
	<author>Sandbags</author>
	<datestamp>1264585800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It not only has a keyboard dock, but it also natively supports the Apple Bluetooth keyboard (which means likely other Bluetooth keyboards as well).  It's a tablet, not a notebook.  If you want a notebook, spend $400 more and get an iBook, spend the same and gett a poorer performing PC netbook.  Spend $1500 and get a "real" tablet.  I think it;s a REAL NICE pricepoint for it's features.  (and we still only know have it's capabilities).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It not only has a keyboard dock , but it also natively supports the Apple Bluetooth keyboard ( which means likely other Bluetooth keyboards as well ) .
It 's a tablet , not a notebook .
If you want a notebook , spend $ 400 more and get an iBook , spend the same and gett a poorer performing PC netbook .
Spend $ 1500 and get a " real " tablet .
I think it ; s a REAL NICE pricepoint for it 's features .
( and we still only know have it 's capabilities ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It not only has a keyboard dock, but it also natively supports the Apple Bluetooth keyboard (which means likely other Bluetooth keyboards as well).
It's a tablet, not a notebook.
If you want a notebook, spend $400 more and get an iBook, spend the same and gett a poorer performing PC netbook.
Spend $1500 and get a "real" tablet.
I think it;s a REAL NICE pricepoint for it's features.
(and we still only know have it's capabilities).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926078</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>broken\_chaos</author>
	<datestamp>1264591200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Throws a TOU violation error. Anyone want to summarise or provide a more reliable link?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Throws a TOU violation error .
Anyone want to summarise or provide a more reliable link ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Throws a TOU violation error.
Anyone want to summarise or provide a more reliable link?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927642</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264597440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is a big enough screen to do office stuff on, while a long enough battery life to last all day.  Potential use-cases where apples other lines don't fit as well:</p><p>1. Student.  Lighter and easier to carry around all day.  Can do word processing on it with a virtual, nearly full size keyboard.<br>2. Frequent traveller.  Ever tried to open up a laptop on a airline seat?  easier in business class but the combined screen and keyboard is a plus here, as is the battery life.<br>3. um... ok, I'm out.</p><p>The point though is that even a macbook is kind of a pain to carry around classes, and the air is very expensive.  I'm one of those sad individuals with five computing devices: iPhone, samsung netbook, apple macbook pro, Windows Vista Desktop, iMac 27".  They each serve a different purpose.  The laptop is good for going to friends and in the living area, but is too heavy to just grab if I'm not sure I'll need it.  The netbook can do office type work, but is under-powered.  On the plus I've been carrying it and had to check if it was there because you can't tell by the weight.  The iPhone is good for un-expected websurfing and email needs, but can't help if I need to make a presentation or do some word-processing.  The windows desktop machine makes a decent media server and games machine, but is a pain to do development on.  the iMac's massive screen is better than two smaller monitors, and has a decent Unix system underneath.</p><p>I don't need the iPad because I have got it covered already.  The netbook does what I would use the iPad for well enough.  Also if I wanted it as a book reader I'd use an e-ink device (up to 3 weeks actual use, not just 10 hours).  If my netbook got stolen though or mysteriously self-destructed I'd be tempted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a big enough screen to do office stuff on , while a long enough battery life to last all day .
Potential use-cases where apples other lines do n't fit as well : 1 .
Student. Lighter and easier to carry around all day .
Can do word processing on it with a virtual , nearly full size keyboard.2 .
Frequent traveller .
Ever tried to open up a laptop on a airline seat ?
easier in business class but the combined screen and keyboard is a plus here , as is the battery life.3 .
um... ok , I 'm out.The point though is that even a macbook is kind of a pain to carry around classes , and the air is very expensive .
I 'm one of those sad individuals with five computing devices : iPhone , samsung netbook , apple macbook pro , Windows Vista Desktop , iMac 27 " .
They each serve a different purpose .
The laptop is good for going to friends and in the living area , but is too heavy to just grab if I 'm not sure I 'll need it .
The netbook can do office type work , but is under-powered .
On the plus I 've been carrying it and had to check if it was there because you ca n't tell by the weight .
The iPhone is good for un-expected websurfing and email needs , but ca n't help if I need to make a presentation or do some word-processing .
The windows desktop machine makes a decent media server and games machine , but is a pain to do development on .
the iMac 's massive screen is better than two smaller monitors , and has a decent Unix system underneath.I do n't need the iPad because I have got it covered already .
The netbook does what I would use the iPad for well enough .
Also if I wanted it as a book reader I 'd use an e-ink device ( up to 3 weeks actual use , not just 10 hours ) .
If my netbook got stolen though or mysteriously self-destructed I 'd be tempted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a big enough screen to do office stuff on, while a long enough battery life to last all day.
Potential use-cases where apples other lines don't fit as well:1.
Student.  Lighter and easier to carry around all day.
Can do word processing on it with a virtual, nearly full size keyboard.2.
Frequent traveller.
Ever tried to open up a laptop on a airline seat?
easier in business class but the combined screen and keyboard is a plus here, as is the battery life.3.
um... ok, I'm out.The point though is that even a macbook is kind of a pain to carry around classes, and the air is very expensive.
I'm one of those sad individuals with five computing devices: iPhone, samsung netbook, apple macbook pro, Windows Vista Desktop, iMac 27".
They each serve a different purpose.
The laptop is good for going to friends and in the living area, but is too heavy to just grab if I'm not sure I'll need it.
The netbook can do office type work, but is under-powered.
On the plus I've been carrying it and had to check if it was there because you can't tell by the weight.
The iPhone is good for un-expected websurfing and email needs, but can't help if I need to make a presentation or do some word-processing.
The windows desktop machine makes a decent media server and games machine, but is a pain to do development on.
the iMac's massive screen is better than two smaller monitors, and has a decent Unix system underneath.I don't need the iPad because I have got it covered already.
The netbook does what I would use the iPad for well enough.
Also if I wanted it as a book reader I'd use an e-ink device (up to 3 weeks actual use, not just 10 hours).
If my netbook got stolen though or mysteriously self-destructed I'd be tempted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954</id>
	<title>3G Data Plans</title>
	<author>rotide</author>
	<datestamp>1264623360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Notes from watching streaming event.</p><p>3G Wireless w/AT&amp;T</p><p>$14.99 for up to 250 MB per month</p><p>$29.99 for unlimited per month</p><p>Discuss?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Notes from watching streaming event.3G Wireless w/AT&amp;T $ 14.99 for up to 250 MB per month $ 29.99 for unlimited per monthDiscuss ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Notes from watching streaming event.3G Wireless w/AT&amp;T$14.99 for up to 250 MB per month$29.99 for unlimited per monthDiscuss?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922804</id>
	<title>My New Audrey</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264625280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think I'm going to get one of these things. I used to have one of those 3Com Ergo Audreys sitting in the dining room for quick email &amp; web browsing, and it was great for the early 2000s. This thing on its dock on the kitchen counter, plugged into the speakers, should be a nice modern replacement and as a bonus you can walk around with it &amp; read books if you want. 3Com tried to get $500 for the Audrey when it first came out, this may actually be worth it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I 'm going to get one of these things .
I used to have one of those 3Com Ergo Audreys sitting in the dining room for quick email &amp; web browsing , and it was great for the early 2000s .
This thing on its dock on the kitchen counter , plugged into the speakers , should be a nice modern replacement and as a bonus you can walk around with it &amp; read books if you want .
3Com tried to get $ 500 for the Audrey when it first came out , this may actually be worth it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I'm going to get one of these things.
I used to have one of those 3Com Ergo Audreys sitting in the dining room for quick email &amp; web browsing, and it was great for the early 2000s.
This thing on its dock on the kitchen counter, plugged into the speakers, should be a nice modern replacement and as a bonus you can walk around with it &amp; read books if you want.
3Com tried to get $500 for the Audrey when it first came out, this may actually be worth it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922164</id>
	<title>$499 for base model; not bad!</title>
	<author>enilnomi</author>
	<datestamp>1264623780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>16GB for $499; 32Gb for $599; 64GB for $699. Add $130 for 3G; carrier will be ATT -- 250MB of data per month for $14.99 or unlimited for $29.99</p><p>::sigh:: sign me up, Scotty</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>16GB for $ 499 ; 32Gb for $ 599 ; 64GB for $ 699 .
Add $ 130 for 3G ; carrier will be ATT -- 250MB of data per month for $ 14.99 or unlimited for $ 29.99 : : sigh : : sign me up , Scotty</tokentext>
<sentencetext>16GB for $499; 32Gb for $599; 64GB for $699.
Add $130 for 3G; carrier will be ATT -- 250MB of data per month for $14.99 or unlimited for $29.99::sigh:: sign me up, Scotty</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922070</id>
	<title>$500!</title>
	<author>7Prime</author>
	<datestamp>1264623600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow... nothing really excited me all that much until this price point. Now, THAT'S low! Very unexpected. I was thinking $600 at bear minimum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow... nothing really excited me all that much until this price point .
Now , THAT 'S low !
Very unexpected .
I was thinking $ 600 at bear minimum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow... nothing really excited me all that much until this price point.
Now, THAT'S low!
Very unexpected.
I was thinking $600 at bear minimum.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929308</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264610280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your video has been yanked (as expected). You mean this one?<br>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eF0y0IfpPU</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your video has been yanked ( as expected ) .
You mean this one ? http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 8eF0y0IfpPU</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your video has been yanked (as expected).
You mean this one?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eF0y0IfpPU</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922238</id>
	<title>Re:3G Data Plans</title>
	<author>murphyd311</author>
	<datestamp>1264623960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are also pre-paid plans that you can activate directly from the device.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are also pre-paid plans that you can activate directly from the device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are also pre-paid plans that you can activate directly from the device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922606</id>
	<title>Re:It has 3G.</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1264624800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, second post to say that, moderated up, and yet completely clueless.  3G means UMTS (if it accepts a SIM, which this does).  UMTS is the standard that, everywhere outside the USA, mobile operators are frantically moving away from as they roll out HSPA (3.5G), which provides an order of more speed, or in some case LTE, which is another order of magnitude beyond that.  </p><p>
It also made me chortle a bit to see the prices that Steve Jobs was saying were a 'breakthrough' in pricing for data access.  I didn't realise how overpriced data traffic was in the USA.  You'd think that companies charging that much would have enough money to roll out HSPA...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , second post to say that , moderated up , and yet completely clueless .
3G means UMTS ( if it accepts a SIM , which this does ) .
UMTS is the standard that , everywhere outside the USA , mobile operators are frantically moving away from as they roll out HSPA ( 3.5G ) , which provides an order of more speed , or in some case LTE , which is another order of magnitude beyond that .
It also made me chortle a bit to see the prices that Steve Jobs was saying were a 'breakthrough ' in pricing for data access .
I did n't realise how overpriced data traffic was in the USA .
You 'd think that companies charging that much would have enough money to roll out HSPA.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, second post to say that, moderated up, and yet completely clueless.
3G means UMTS (if it accepts a SIM, which this does).
UMTS is the standard that, everywhere outside the USA, mobile operators are frantically moving away from as they roll out HSPA (3.5G), which provides an order of more speed, or in some case LTE, which is another order of magnitude beyond that.
It also made me chortle a bit to see the prices that Steve Jobs was saying were a 'breakthrough' in pricing for data access.
I didn't realise how overpriced data traffic was in the USA.
You'd think that companies charging that much would have enough money to roll out HSPA...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921902</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923108</id>
	<title>Would have been a better graphics tablet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264582860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Adding a stylus and combining the pressure-sensitive functionality of a Wacom graphics tablet, with the ability to see results on the drawing surface itself, would have been a far better marketing angle and would serve to cement Apple's position as a premiere content-creation platform.</p><p>From what I've seen there is no compelling use-case to warrant buying one of these devices, which (correct me if I'm wrong) is for all intents and purposes less functional than an iPhone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Adding a stylus and combining the pressure-sensitive functionality of a Wacom graphics tablet , with the ability to see results on the drawing surface itself , would have been a far better marketing angle and would serve to cement Apple 's position as a premiere content-creation platform.From what I 've seen there is no compelling use-case to warrant buying one of these devices , which ( correct me if I 'm wrong ) is for all intents and purposes less functional than an iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Adding a stylus and combining the pressure-sensitive functionality of a Wacom graphics tablet, with the ability to see results on the drawing surface itself, would have been a far better marketing angle and would serve to cement Apple's position as a premiere content-creation platform.From what I've seen there is no compelling use-case to warrant buying one of these devices, which (correct me if I'm wrong) is for all intents and purposes less functional than an iPhone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923206</id>
	<title>Re:No WCMDA/HSPA or even CDMA/EVDO is a huge miss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264583040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>they do have 3g. just announced</p></div><p>lol 3g, what is this? Kindergarten?<br>I usually move around 100g a week and thats nothing!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>they do have 3g .
just announcedlol 3g , what is this ?
Kindergarten ? I usually move around 100g a week and thats nothing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they do have 3g.
just announcedlol 3g, what is this?
Kindergarten?I usually move around 100g a week and thats nothing!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926104</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig</title>
	<author>cualexander</author>
	<datestamp>1264591320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Updated version:

No flash. Less space than an Archos.  Lame.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Updated version : No flash .
Less space than an Archos .
Lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Updated version:

No flash.
Less space than an Archos.
Lame.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927060</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>TrancePhreak</author>
	<datestamp>1264594440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Flash has been shown running full speed on other devices. iPhone 3G/2G already have low battery life when playing games. If Apple doesn't open up, people are likely to notice that Apple products are missing functionality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Flash has been shown running full speed on other devices .
iPhone 3G/2G already have low battery life when playing games .
If Apple does n't open up , people are likely to notice that Apple products are missing functionality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flash has been shown running full speed on other devices.
iPhone 3G/2G already have low battery life when playing games.
If Apple doesn't open up, people are likely to notice that Apple products are missing functionality.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>fiannaFailMan</author>
	<datestamp>1264623360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you can free TV shows and movies streaming over Flash, why buy them on iTunes?</p><p>I don't expect Flash on this or the iPhone anytime soon.</p></div><p>Er, Flash isn't on the iPhone? How come I'm able to watch all those youtube and other web movies on mine then?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you can free TV shows and movies streaming over Flash , why buy them on iTunes ? I do n't expect Flash on this or the iPhone anytime soon.Er , Flash is n't on the iPhone ?
How come I 'm able to watch all those youtube and other web movies on mine then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can free TV shows and movies streaming over Flash, why buy them on iTunes?I don't expect Flash on this or the iPhone anytime soon.Er, Flash isn't on the iPhone?
How come I'm able to watch all those youtube and other web movies on mine then?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924818</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1264587420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What an unfortunate name.</p></div><p>Nintendo got away with using Wii (urinate, pee, tinkle, piss, whiz).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What an unfortunate name.Nintendo got away with using Wii ( urinate , pee , tinkle , piss , whiz ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What an unfortunate name.Nintendo got away with using Wii (urinate, pee, tinkle, piss, whiz).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923024</id>
	<title>Re:Pricing announced</title>
	<author>MistrBlank</author>
	<datestamp>1264625820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't even know why apple bothered.  250MB is laughable.  With the way providers calculate data, you'll use that just turning the device on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't even know why apple bothered .
250MB is laughable .
With the way providers calculate data , you 'll use that just turning the device on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't even know why apple bothered.
250MB is laughable.
With the way providers calculate data, you'll use that just turning the device on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923220</id>
	<title>I couldn't help myself...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264583040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>really just thought it had to be done...</p><p>http://www.itslennysfault.com/stuff/ipad.jpg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>really just thought it had to be done...http : //www.itslennysfault.com/stuff/ipad.jpg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>really just thought it had to be done...http://www.itslennysfault.com/stuff/ipad.jpg</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922198</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264623840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Predicted by MadTV years ago:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1BUH9eXy18" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1BUH9eXy18</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Predicted by MadTV years ago : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = A1BUH9eXy18 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Predicted by MadTV years ago:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1BUH9eXy18 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924932</id>
	<title>Re:Disappointing.</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1264587780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iPhone OS is a customized version of OS X (running on an ARM chip) - they share over 80\% of their source code...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iPhone OS is a customized version of OS X ( running on an ARM chip ) - they share over 80 \ % of their source code.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iPhone OS is a customized version of OS X (running on an ARM chip) - they share over 80\% of their source code...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923416</id>
	<title>Apple Needs To Ditch AT&amp;T</title>
	<author>TheNinjaroach</author>
	<datestamp>1264583580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't believe Apple has married another mobile device to AT&amp;T, which immediately renders the 3G model useless for me.  I was expecting to hear an announcement about Apple on Verizon for both iPhone and iPad.  Instead it sounds like it is more of the same, at some point AT&amp;T's lack of adequate coverage is going to hurt Apple's image.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe Apple has married another mobile device to AT&amp;T , which immediately renders the 3G model useless for me .
I was expecting to hear an announcement about Apple on Verizon for both iPhone and iPad .
Instead it sounds like it is more of the same , at some point AT&amp;T 's lack of adequate coverage is going to hurt Apple 's image .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe Apple has married another mobile device to AT&amp;T, which immediately renders the 3G model useless for me.
I was expecting to hear an announcement about Apple on Verizon for both iPhone and iPad.
Instead it sounds like it is more of the same, at some point AT&amp;T's lack of adequate coverage is going to hurt Apple's image.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922362</id>
	<title>Guessing the iPad application will change its name</title>
	<author>dunsurfin</author>
	<datestamp>1264624260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like the unfortunately named iPad application will be changing it name:

<a href="http://www.apple.com/downloads/dashboard/business/ipad.html" title="apple.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/downloads/dashboard/business/ipad.html</a> [apple.com]

As of the time of writing, this was the only result searching for iPad on Apple's site.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like the unfortunately named iPad application will be changing it name : http : //www.apple.com/downloads/dashboard/business/ipad.html [ apple.com ] As of the time of writing , this was the only result searching for iPad on Apple 's site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like the unfortunately named iPad application will be changing it name:

http://www.apple.com/downloads/dashboard/business/ipad.html [apple.com]

As of the time of writing, this was the only result searching for iPad on Apple's site.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926366</id>
	<title>Re:Typical techies and gadget freaks</title>
	<author>DeltaQH</author>
	<datestamp>1264592100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ease of use, ease of use and ease of use.<br> <br>
Same problem with Iphone. Oh it does not have Trillion pixel camera, super processor, FM Radio, whatever?<br> <br>

Besides the user interface It is the integration of hardware+software that apple can achieve. It flight around other hardware with more bells and whistles but poorly integrated and with poor UI. <br> <br>

Just check Nokia.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ease of use , ease of use and ease of use .
Same problem with Iphone .
Oh it does not have Trillion pixel camera , super processor , FM Radio , whatever ?
Besides the user interface It is the integration of hardware + software that apple can achieve .
It flight around other hardware with more bells and whistles but poorly integrated and with poor UI .
Just check Nokia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ease of use, ease of use and ease of use.
Same problem with Iphone.
Oh it does not have Trillion pixel camera, super processor, FM Radio, whatever?
Besides the user interface It is the integration of hardware+software that apple can achieve.
It flight around other hardware with more bells and whistles but poorly integrated and with poor UI.
Just check Nokia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926240</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264591740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All of us wannabe geek with CS graduate degrees and years (13+ in my case) of IT support and management experience, respond with a firm, "STFU."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All of us wannabe geek with CS graduate degrees and years ( 13 + in my case ) of IT support and management experience , respond with a firm , " STFU .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of us wannabe geek with CS graduate degrees and years (13+ in my case) of IT support and management experience, respond with a firm, "STFU.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927412</id>
	<title>Re:The iPad is a Platform</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264596180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>agreed.</p><p>the ipad is good enough as far a i'm concerned to sell to all my parents, grandparerents, and parents-in-law.</p><p>done</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>agreed.the ipad is good enough as far a i 'm concerned to sell to all my parents , grandparerents , and parents-in-law.done</tokentext>
<sentencetext>agreed.the ipad is good enough as far a i'm concerned to sell to all my parents, grandparerents, and parents-in-law.done</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926800</id>
	<title>Re:No contract need for 3G!</title>
	<author>newcastlejon</author>
	<datestamp>1264593480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All well and good, but MicroSIM? Why?! What possible need was there for another size card? The credit card-sized ones were obviously too large but you couldn't argue that the space savings in something so much bigger than a phone were worth putting off anyone who already has a SIM.</p><p>It's unlocked but good luck getting a SIM for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All well and good , but MicroSIM ?
Why ? ! What possible need was there for another size card ?
The credit card-sized ones were obviously too large but you could n't argue that the space savings in something so much bigger than a phone were worth putting off anyone who already has a SIM.It 's unlocked but good luck getting a SIM for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All well and good, but MicroSIM?
Why?! What possible need was there for another size card?
The credit card-sized ones were obviously too large but you couldn't argue that the space savings in something so much bigger than a phone were worth putting off anyone who already has a SIM.It's unlocked but good luck getting a SIM for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921578</id>
	<title>For one the name "iPad" is hysterical</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only reason why I would need a bigger iTouch is because apple intentionally does not provide an onboard PDF reader on the smaller version.  And the only reason the iPad will be bought is that apple has restricted that feature intentionally.</p><p>No Thanks, I will be getting an Entourage instead of a Steve Jobs Etch-a-sketch.  It will most likely be way cheaper than it - that's for sure.</p><p>Plus the name is hysterical iPad?! Really LMFAO! xD</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only reason why I would need a bigger iTouch is because apple intentionally does not provide an onboard PDF reader on the smaller version .
And the only reason the iPad will be bought is that apple has restricted that feature intentionally.No Thanks , I will be getting an Entourage instead of a Steve Jobs Etch-a-sketch .
It will most likely be way cheaper than it - that 's for sure.Plus the name is hysterical iPad ? !
Really LMFAO !
xD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only reason why I would need a bigger iTouch is because apple intentionally does not provide an onboard PDF reader on the smaller version.
And the only reason the iPad will be bought is that apple has restricted that feature intentionally.No Thanks, I will be getting an Entourage instead of a Steve Jobs Etch-a-sketch.
It will most likely be way cheaper than it - that's for sure.Plus the name is hysterical iPad?!
Really LMFAO!
xD</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921354</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>clampolo</author>
	<datestamp>1264622160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Isn't this just a big expensive iPod touch now?</p></div><p>Yeah, my thoughts exactly.  I was expecting the thing to have a different take on ebook readers.  I'll stick to a kindle/nook with its eink and the smaller profile..</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this just a big expensive iPod touch now ? Yeah , my thoughts exactly .
I was expecting the thing to have a different take on ebook readers .
I 'll stick to a kindle/nook with its eink and the smaller profile. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this just a big expensive iPod touch now?Yeah, my thoughts exactly.
I was expecting the thing to have a different take on ebook readers.
I'll stick to a kindle/nook with its eink and the smaller profile..
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30930142</id>
	<title>Re:Pros vs Cons</title>
	<author>mxh83</author>
	<datestamp>1264619940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>720p is NOT hd.</htmltext>
<tokenext>720p is NOT hd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>720p is NOT hd.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922156</id>
	<title>iPad = Oversized iPod (almost)</title>
	<author>internetdarwin</author>
	<datestamp>1264623720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seeing Jobs hold the "iPad" reminds of this, in both form and relative functionality: <a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3244/3137570578\_6d9ab29809.jpg" title="flickr.com" rel="nofollow">http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3244/3137570578\_6d9ab29809.jpg</a> [flickr.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seeing Jobs hold the " iPad " reminds of this , in both form and relative functionality : http : //farm4.static.flickr.com/3244/3137570578 \ _6d9ab29809.jpg [ flickr.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seeing Jobs hold the "iPad" reminds of this, in both form and relative functionality: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3244/3137570578\_6d9ab29809.jpg [flickr.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923080</id>
	<title>Re:So far some interesting points</title>
	<author>Overzeetop</author>
	<datestamp>1264582800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This device is severely limited and would do a quick faceplant if it were not Apple. I don't say this as a troll; Apple creates a marketplace for their devices, and that's what makes them great.</p><p>This device NEEDS a dedicated app store to make it useful. There's nothing valuable written for touchpads right now - no decent OS support, no decent touch oriented apps, nothing. MS has been very lax in their support of touchpad devices because they've been chasing other things. WinMobile still thinks most people use a stylus on a PDA. They've ignored finger-driven phones for two full code cycles already.  Most apps are desktop based (or laptop), so they're driven my mouse/pointer interaction. This iPad doesn't have a keyboard, so kb shortcuts that power users are used to are out the window. The lack of a WM app store means that practically anything you buy for a WM device is going to be $20-$30 per app from a 3rd party. It's hard to get a good stable of apps for less than the price of the phone!</p><p>It's Apple, so there's a single interface. That will get the accessory makers to make this thing connect to everything we already use (like the iPod is to car stereos...every heard of a Zune native interface on an mass produced aftermarket head unit?) By getting really good apps on this, people will find it useful, if not ideal. And ideal isn't what people want - they just want good.</p><p>Don't get me started on the cloud, though. I don't live in a major metro area, so finding 3G outside of my town is a bit dicey. That means 60-90kbps data rates, and I'm not going to get anything useful in realtime over a link like that. And if I don't pony up $360/yr (or tether my $1000/yr phone plan), I'm stuck with no cloud resources at all when I'm out of a wi-fi hotspot - which is practically everywhere. You can still use the cloud if you have local storage; you can't work off-cloud if you don't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This device is severely limited and would do a quick faceplant if it were not Apple .
I do n't say this as a troll ; Apple creates a marketplace for their devices , and that 's what makes them great.This device NEEDS a dedicated app store to make it useful .
There 's nothing valuable written for touchpads right now - no decent OS support , no decent touch oriented apps , nothing .
MS has been very lax in their support of touchpad devices because they 've been chasing other things .
WinMobile still thinks most people use a stylus on a PDA .
They 've ignored finger-driven phones for two full code cycles already .
Most apps are desktop based ( or laptop ) , so they 're driven my mouse/pointer interaction .
This iPad does n't have a keyboard , so kb shortcuts that power users are used to are out the window .
The lack of a WM app store means that practically anything you buy for a WM device is going to be $ 20- $ 30 per app from a 3rd party .
It 's hard to get a good stable of apps for less than the price of the phone ! It 's Apple , so there 's a single interface .
That will get the accessory makers to make this thing connect to everything we already use ( like the iPod is to car stereos...every heard of a Zune native interface on an mass produced aftermarket head unit ?
) By getting really good apps on this , people will find it useful , if not ideal .
And ideal is n't what people want - they just want good.Do n't get me started on the cloud , though .
I do n't live in a major metro area , so finding 3G outside of my town is a bit dicey .
That means 60-90kbps data rates , and I 'm not going to get anything useful in realtime over a link like that .
And if I do n't pony up $ 360/yr ( or tether my $ 1000/yr phone plan ) , I 'm stuck with no cloud resources at all when I 'm out of a wi-fi hotspot - which is practically everywhere .
You can still use the cloud if you have local storage ; you ca n't work off-cloud if you do n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This device is severely limited and would do a quick faceplant if it were not Apple.
I don't say this as a troll; Apple creates a marketplace for their devices, and that's what makes them great.This device NEEDS a dedicated app store to make it useful.
There's nothing valuable written for touchpads right now - no decent OS support, no decent touch oriented apps, nothing.
MS has been very lax in their support of touchpad devices because they've been chasing other things.
WinMobile still thinks most people use a stylus on a PDA.
They've ignored finger-driven phones for two full code cycles already.
Most apps are desktop based (or laptop), so they're driven my mouse/pointer interaction.
This iPad doesn't have a keyboard, so kb shortcuts that power users are used to are out the window.
The lack of a WM app store means that practically anything you buy for a WM device is going to be $20-$30 per app from a 3rd party.
It's hard to get a good stable of apps for less than the price of the phone!It's Apple, so there's a single interface.
That will get the accessory makers to make this thing connect to everything we already use (like the iPod is to car stereos...every heard of a Zune native interface on an mass produced aftermarket head unit?
) By getting really good apps on this, people will find it useful, if not ideal.
And ideal isn't what people want - they just want good.Don't get me started on the cloud, though.
I don't live in a major metro area, so finding 3G outside of my town is a bit dicey.
That means 60-90kbps data rates, and I'm not going to get anything useful in realtime over a link like that.
And if I don't pony up $360/yr (or tether my $1000/yr phone plan), I'm stuck with no cloud resources at all when I'm out of a wi-fi hotspot - which is practically everywhere.
You can still use the cloud if you have local storage; you can't work off-cloud if you don't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925152</id>
	<title>Re:The iPad is a Platform</title>
	<author>servognome</author>
	<datestamp>1264588500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Totally agree with you, the iPad needs to be looked at in terms of a media delivery platform.  Unfortunately, Jobs put it squarely in competition with netbooks, which this would not replace for many users.  The iPad lacks the capabilities and flexibility to really replace a good keyboard and touchpad device.<br>At it's size it's not a phone, it's not a camera, and not really a convenient music player.  I see this device in its basic form aimed at replacing the portable DVD player and ebook reader.<br>The community will ultimately decide whether it's just a bigger iPod meant for video and books, or if it truly is a breakthrough product.  It has a lot of things going for it in terms of form factor and computing power.  A few great apps will make this device compelling in a number of different markets.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Totally agree with you , the iPad needs to be looked at in terms of a media delivery platform .
Unfortunately , Jobs put it squarely in competition with netbooks , which this would not replace for many users .
The iPad lacks the capabilities and flexibility to really replace a good keyboard and touchpad device.At it 's size it 's not a phone , it 's not a camera , and not really a convenient music player .
I see this device in its basic form aimed at replacing the portable DVD player and ebook reader.The community will ultimately decide whether it 's just a bigger iPod meant for video and books , or if it truly is a breakthrough product .
It has a lot of things going for it in terms of form factor and computing power .
A few great apps will make this device compelling in a number of different markets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Totally agree with you, the iPad needs to be looked at in terms of a media delivery platform.
Unfortunately, Jobs put it squarely in competition with netbooks, which this would not replace for many users.
The iPad lacks the capabilities and flexibility to really replace a good keyboard and touchpad device.At it's size it's not a phone, it's not a camera, and not really a convenient music player.
I see this device in its basic form aimed at replacing the portable DVD player and ebook reader.The community will ultimately decide whether it's just a bigger iPod meant for video and books, or if it truly is a breakthrough product.
It has a lot of things going for it in terms of form factor and computing power.
A few great apps will make this device compelling in a number of different markets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927718</id>
	<title>Brilliant!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264597860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Steve has really nailed this one! Even better than the iPhone! Who needs books anymore, where are my matches. And please don't compare this to a shitty $200 chinese netbook. Come on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Steve has really nailed this one !
Even better than the iPhone !
Who needs books anymore , where are my matches .
And please do n't compare this to a shitty $ 200 chinese netbook .
Come on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Steve has really nailed this one!
Even better than the iPhone!
Who needs books anymore, where are my matches.
And please don't compare this to a shitty $200 chinese netbook.
Come on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30958968</id>
	<title>Re:Something the world DIDN'T need...</title>
	<author>ukyoCE</author>
	<datestamp>1264782120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>$50 gets you an OS and apps with interfaces made specifically for the iPad, as a massive upgrade over WindowsXYZ</p></div><p>Fixed that for you.  Tablets and netbooks are nothing new, but they've never been successful so far.  The software and interfaces have all sucked.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 50 gets you an OS and apps with interfaces made specifically for the iPad , as a massive upgrade over WindowsXYZFixed that for you .
Tablets and netbooks are nothing new , but they 've never been successful so far .
The software and interfaces have all sucked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$50 gets you an OS and apps with interfaces made specifically for the iPad, as a massive upgrade over WindowsXYZFixed that for you.
Tablets and netbooks are nothing new, but they've never been successful so far.
The software and interfaces have all sucked.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929008</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't Create a Need</title>
	<author>cgenman</author>
	<datestamp>1264607040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you used an iPhone?  I find myself Kindle-ing on the iPhone a lot, and wonder if a real eInk reader is better enough to warrant another device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you used an iPhone ?
I find myself Kindle-ing on the iPhone a lot , and wonder if a real eInk reader is better enough to warrant another device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you used an iPhone?
I find myself Kindle-ing on the iPhone a lot, and wonder if a real eInk reader is better enough to warrant another device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922780</id>
	<title>Re:Awkward keyboard usage</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1264625220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It has a keyboard dock, which makes this into essentially a netbook.  Thus it is good enough for anyone who wants to watch movies, check email, play a few games, surf the net......basically the netbook market.  It appears to have USB ports on the side.  <br> <br>
It would be a travesty if this thing didn't support third party apps.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It has a keyboard dock , which makes this into essentially a netbook .
Thus it is good enough for anyone who wants to watch movies , check email , play a few games , surf the net......basically the netbook market .
It appears to have USB ports on the side .
It would be a travesty if this thing did n't support third party apps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has a keyboard dock, which makes this into essentially a netbook.
Thus it is good enough for anyone who wants to watch movies, check email, play a few games, surf the net......basically the netbook market.
It appears to have USB ports on the side.
It would be a travesty if this thing didn't support third party apps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931742</id>
	<title>Re:A4...</title>
	<author>Froggie</author>
	<datestamp>1264683240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uh, 1992?  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DEC\_Alpha" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DEC\_Alpha</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh , 1992 ?
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DEC \ _Alpha [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh, 1992?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DEC\_Alpha [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921732</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924526</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>WaywardGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1264586640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed.  E-book reader is the killer app for 10" tablets.  Replace the display with a sunlight readable Pixel Qi, thus reducing the battery size and price.  I think it should run Ubuntu Netbook Remix, and be price-competitive with the Kindle, meaning around $300 or less.  I think we'll start seeing these things later this year!</p><p>What's up with all the wasted screen space on the iPad?  It's got like 1" all the way around with no purpose other than the "Home" button.  Couldn't they have shrunk  this device a ton, or offered a larger screen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
E-book reader is the killer app for 10 " tablets .
Replace the display with a sunlight readable Pixel Qi , thus reducing the battery size and price .
I think it should run Ubuntu Netbook Remix , and be price-competitive with the Kindle , meaning around $ 300 or less .
I think we 'll start seeing these things later this year ! What 's up with all the wasted screen space on the iPad ?
It 's got like 1 " all the way around with no purpose other than the " Home " button .
Could n't they have shrunk this device a ton , or offered a larger screen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
E-book reader is the killer app for 10" tablets.
Replace the display with a sunlight readable Pixel Qi, thus reducing the battery size and price.
I think it should run Ubuntu Netbook Remix, and be price-competitive with the Kindle, meaning around $300 or less.
I think we'll start seeing these things later this year!What's up with all the wasted screen space on the iPad?
It's got like 1" all the way around with no purpose other than the "Home" button.
Couldn't they have shrunk  this device a ton, or offered a larger screen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923892</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1264584720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The youtube experience:</p><p>1) Try to find the show. If you can't find it you're SOL</p><p>2) Find show part 1. Move closer to the monitor to recognize the characters.</p><p>3) Find show part 2. Oops wrong part 2, this one has a gap.</p><p>4) Find show part 3. Shit there is no part 3, you're SOL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The youtube experience : 1 ) Try to find the show .
If you ca n't find it you 're SOL2 ) Find show part 1 .
Move closer to the monitor to recognize the characters.3 ) Find show part 2 .
Oops wrong part 2 , this one has a gap.4 ) Find show part 3 .
Shit there is no part 3 , you 're SOL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The youtube experience:1) Try to find the show.
If you can't find it you're SOL2) Find show part 1.
Move closer to the monitor to recognize the characters.3) Find show part 2.
Oops wrong part 2, this one has a gap.4) Find show part 3.
Shit there is no part 3, you're SOL.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346</id>
	<title>Awkward keyboard usage</title>
	<author>jimasksme</author>
	<datestamp>1264622160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>A nice solid entry and a step ahead in the evolution of portable computing.

Although, the usage of the keyboard perplexes me.  Using a keyboard while the screen lays flat just seems awkward to me..<br> <br>

<a href="http://jimasks.me/if-you-could-choose-how-you-would-die-what-would-you-choose-and-why" title="jimasks.me" rel="nofollow">http://jimasks.me/if-you-could-choose-how-you-would-die-what-would-you-choose-and-why</a> [jimasks.me]</htmltext>
<tokenext>A nice solid entry and a step ahead in the evolution of portable computing .
Although , the usage of the keyboard perplexes me .
Using a keyboard while the screen lays flat just seems awkward to me. . http : //jimasks.me/if-you-could-choose-how-you-would-die-what-would-you-choose-and-why [ jimasks.me ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A nice solid entry and a step ahead in the evolution of portable computing.
Although, the usage of the keyboard perplexes me.
Using a keyboard while the screen lays flat just seems awkward to me.. 

http://jimasks.me/if-you-could-choose-how-you-would-die-what-would-you-choose-and-why [jimasks.me]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921962</id>
	<title>There is wireless, guys</title>
	<author>Piquan</author>
	<datestamp>1264623420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some models have 3G through AT&amp;T, $15 / mo (250 MB) or $30 / mo (unlimited).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some models have 3G through AT&amp;T , $ 15 / mo ( 250 MB ) or $ 30 / mo ( unlimited ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some models have 3G through AT&amp;T, $15 / mo (250 MB) or $30 / mo (unlimited).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923714</id>
	<title>Re:$500!</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1264584300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, it's still more than most (more functional) netbooks out there, and more than most eInk readers (and eInk screens are way more expensive than LCD).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it 's still more than most ( more functional ) netbooks out there , and more than most eInk readers ( and eInk screens are way more expensive than LCD ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it's still more than most (more functional) netbooks out there, and more than most eInk readers (and eInk screens are way more expensive than LCD).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921370</id>
	<title>Yes but...</title>
	<author>thewils</author>
	<datestamp>1264622160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it run Linux? And can I play Duke Nukem Forever on it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it run Linux ?
And can I play Duke Nukem Forever on it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it run Linux?
And can I play Duke Nukem Forever on it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924840</id>
	<title>Re:With that weak processor?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264587480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>1GHz on an ARM is going to be necessarily limited in horsepower, and dividing that between several apps is going to lead to poor input response.</i></p><p>Motorola 68000, 8MHz seemed to handle pre-emptive multitasking just fine. Ah, progress!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1GHz on an ARM is going to be necessarily limited in horsepower , and dividing that between several apps is going to lead to poor input response.Motorola 68000 , 8MHz seemed to handle pre-emptive multitasking just fine .
Ah , progress !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1GHz on an ARM is going to be necessarily limited in horsepower, and dividing that between several apps is going to lead to poor input response.Motorola 68000, 8MHz seemed to handle pre-emptive multitasking just fine.
Ah, progress!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922764</id>
	<title>Re:It has 3G.</title>
	<author>WiiVault</author>
	<datestamp>1264625160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>On further note check the specs on Apples site. It shows you to be quite "clueless".</htmltext>
<tokenext>On further note check the specs on Apples site .
It shows you to be quite " clueless " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On further note check the specs on Apples site.
It shows you to be quite "clueless".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30961766</id>
	<title>Re:We should be CELEBRATING this thing</title>
	<author>Feral Bueller</author>
	<datestamp>1264863120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You nailed it.
<p>
99.9\% of Slashdot are not Apple's target audience. I'm looking at you Freegan Penguinista Android fanbois.
</p><p>
The rest of the world, you know, the ones that bathe regularly, don't go "shopping" for their groceries out of trash bins, have managed to move out of their parents houses?
</p><p>
It's for them.

Most people don't want to waste time farting around with their computers. They want to get whatever it is they're trying to get done, done.
</p><p>
Try reading this. It was written by someone who actually develops software for a living, and is apparently confident enough about their appearance to show a picture of their face on their blog.
</p><p>
<a href="http://speirs.org/blog/2010/1/29/future-shock.html" title="speirs.org">http://speirs.org/blog/2010/1/29/future-shock.html</a> [speirs.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You nailed it .
99.9 \ % of Slashdot are not Apple 's target audience .
I 'm looking at you Freegan Penguinista Android fanbois .
The rest of the world , you know , the ones that bathe regularly , do n't go " shopping " for their groceries out of trash bins , have managed to move out of their parents houses ?
It 's for them .
Most people do n't want to waste time farting around with their computers .
They want to get whatever it is they 're trying to get done , done .
Try reading this .
It was written by someone who actually develops software for a living , and is apparently confident enough about their appearance to show a picture of their face on their blog .
http : //speirs.org/blog/2010/1/29/future-shock.html [ speirs.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You nailed it.
99.9\% of Slashdot are not Apple's target audience.
I'm looking at you Freegan Penguinista Android fanbois.
The rest of the world, you know, the ones that bathe regularly, don't go "shopping" for their groceries out of trash bins, have managed to move out of their parents houses?
It's for them.
Most people don't want to waste time farting around with their computers.
They want to get whatever it is they're trying to get done, done.
Try reading this.
It was written by someone who actually develops software for a living, and is apparently confident enough about their appearance to show a picture of their face on their blog.
http://speirs.org/blog/2010/1/29/future-shock.html [speirs.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30930552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923936</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Nimey</author>
	<datestamp>1264584840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll take "Internet Explorer" for $500, Alex.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll take " Internet Explorer " for $ 500 , Alex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll take "Internet Explorer" for $500, Alex.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922140</id>
	<title>Re:Taking Jobs at his word</title>
	<author>Archangel Michael</author>
	<datestamp>1264623720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Phone suck for "reading" and movies<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Laptops mostly overload for reading and movies. There is other potential market places for this like perhaps a new class of games or games that already exist on iPhone that would like more screen.</p><p>I don't know the pricing on these things, but imagine if you bought one, and it came with two ebooks and a movie download from iTunes. I would rather have something like this on a long flight than having to flip open my notebook just to watch a movie, and when I was done, switch to the latest book i am reading.</p><p>This is what iTouch should have been.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Phone suck for " reading " and movies ... Laptops mostly overload for reading and movies .
There is other potential market places for this like perhaps a new class of games or games that already exist on iPhone that would like more screen.I do n't know the pricing on these things , but imagine if you bought one , and it came with two ebooks and a movie download from iTunes .
I would rather have something like this on a long flight than having to flip open my notebook just to watch a movie , and when I was done , switch to the latest book i am reading.This is what iTouch should have been .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Phone suck for "reading" and movies ... Laptops mostly overload for reading and movies.
There is other potential market places for this like perhaps a new class of games or games that already exist on iPhone that would like more screen.I don't know the pricing on these things, but imagine if you bought one, and it came with two ebooks and a movie download from iTunes.
I would rather have something like this on a long flight than having to flip open my notebook just to watch a movie, and when I was done, switch to the latest book i am reading.This is what iTouch should have been.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927734</id>
	<title>Re:No WCMDA/HSPA or even CDMA/EVDO is a huge miss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264597920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am waiting for the lettuce upgrade</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am waiting for the lettuce upgrade</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am waiting for the lettuce upgrade</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931292</id>
	<title>Re:No stylus eh?</title>
	<author>SimonTheSoundMan</author>
	<datestamp>1264677300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Capacitive stylus will work with this, just like on the iPhone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Capacitive stylus will work with this , just like on the iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Capacitive stylus will work with this, just like on the iPhone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923748</id>
	<title>The iPad nano is available too</title>
	<author>kindbud</author>
	<datestamp>1264584360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.apple.com/ipodtouch/" title="apple.com">Check it out.</a> [apple.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Check it out .
[ apple.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check it out.
[apple.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921920</id>
	<title>iReturned myKindle</title>
	<author>Singularity42</author>
	<datestamp>1264623300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry about the title...couldn't help it.  Anyway, the killer for me was waiting for the page to turn.  iPhone is too small, and still waiting on Kindle for my MacBook.  I'm interested.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry about the title...could n't help it .
Anyway , the killer for me was waiting for the page to turn .
iPhone is too small , and still waiting on Kindle for my MacBook .
I 'm interested .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry about the title...couldn't help it.
Anyway, the killer for me was waiting for the page to turn.
iPhone is too small, and still waiting on Kindle for my MacBook.
I'm interested.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922576</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jailbroken iPhone's work with Bluetooth keyboard, so presumably yes.  However, there is no concept of a pointer on these things, yet...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jailbroken iPhone 's work with Bluetooth keyboard , so presumably yes .
However , there is no concept of a pointer on these things , yet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jailbroken iPhone's work with Bluetooth keyboard, so presumably yes.
However, there is no concept of a pointer on these things, yet...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288</id>
	<title>Doesn't Create a Need</title>
	<author>Bryan Gividen</author>
	<datestamp>1264622040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This entire presentation seems a little disappointing. Really, it looks, acts, and feels like a giant iPod Touch. Whereas the iPhone and iPod really created a need , I don't see that this substantially innovate to make it a must-have. It doesn't seem to improve on anything so substantially that it is an obvious choice. Maybe I need to see a few more videos, but I don't see this pulling serious market share away from Kindle's targeted market segment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This entire presentation seems a little disappointing .
Really , it looks , acts , and feels like a giant iPod Touch .
Whereas the iPhone and iPod really created a need , I do n't see that this substantially innovate to make it a must-have .
It does n't seem to improve on anything so substantially that it is an obvious choice .
Maybe I need to see a few more videos , but I do n't see this pulling serious market share away from Kindle 's targeted market segment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This entire presentation seems a little disappointing.
Really, it looks, acts, and feels like a giant iPod Touch.
Whereas the iPhone and iPod really created a need , I don't see that this substantially innovate to make it a must-have.
It doesn't seem to improve on anything so substantially that it is an obvious choice.
Maybe I need to see a few more videos, but I don't see this pulling serious market share away from Kindle's targeted market segment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922722</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264625100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Flash has been able to be exported to the iPhone for over a year.  You mean you don't expect the Flash plug-in for Safari any time soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Flash has been able to be exported to the iPhone for over a year .
You mean you do n't expect the Flash plug-in for Safari any time soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flash has been able to be exported to the iPhone for over a year.
You mean you don't expect the Flash plug-in for Safari any time soon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923800</id>
	<title>I CALLED IT.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264584480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I knew it would cost $500-1000.  Apple always overprices their products.</p><p>- PC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew it would cost $ 500-1000 .
Apple always overprices their products.- PC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew it would cost $500-1000.
Apple always overprices their products.- PC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924432</id>
	<title>Re:The iPad is a Platform</title>
	<author>Reformed Lurker</author>
	<datestamp>1264586220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mod poster up.

My wife, who thinks I sound like Charlie Brown's teacher when I mention technical terms (like "mouse") abosolutely loves the iPhone she got in November, and constantly finds ways to use it whenever she can - without needing my help.  She'll eat this iPad up.

It's people like her who will make this a success.  Easy to use; fits their needs.  Their target market is not slashdot (except to entice developers to get on-board).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod poster up .
My wife , who thinks I sound like Charlie Brown 's teacher when I mention technical terms ( like " mouse " ) abosolutely loves the iPhone she got in November , and constantly finds ways to use it whenever she can - without needing my help .
She 'll eat this iPad up .
It 's people like her who will make this a success .
Easy to use ; fits their needs .
Their target market is not slashdot ( except to entice developers to get on-board ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod poster up.
My wife, who thinks I sound like Charlie Brown's teacher when I mention technical terms (like "mouse") abosolutely loves the iPhone she got in November, and constantly finds ways to use it whenever she can - without needing my help.
She'll eat this iPad up.
It's people like her who will make this a success.
Easy to use; fits their needs.
Their target market is not slashdot (except to entice developers to get on-board).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924480</id>
	<title>Disappointed.</title>
	<author>Azureflare</author>
	<datestamp>1264586460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I own a lot of Apple products and I must say I was very disappointed in this presentation. Two major problems with the iPad will probably keep me from buying one.
<br> <br>
1. LED backlit screen. This seems strange given the existence of PixelQi and mirasol type LCD displays.  Not being able to read this outside really makes it useless as an ebook reader. Oh, and also the 10 hours of reading time is simply pathetic for an eReader.<br> <br>
2. No camera? What happened?  This is very disappointing.
<br> <br>
I must admit I have, in the past, thought it would be cool to have a large version of my iPhone to view movies in bed or browse the web before going to sleep, but honestly it is not worth the $500 price tag without the 2 features above.
<br> <br>
I think I'll just stick with my iPhone, thanks.  "Nice-to-haves" do not make product demand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I own a lot of Apple products and I must say I was very disappointed in this presentation .
Two major problems with the iPad will probably keep me from buying one .
1. LED backlit screen .
This seems strange given the existence of PixelQi and mirasol type LCD displays .
Not being able to read this outside really makes it useless as an ebook reader .
Oh , and also the 10 hours of reading time is simply pathetic for an eReader .
2. No camera ?
What happened ?
This is very disappointing .
I must admit I have , in the past , thought it would be cool to have a large version of my iPhone to view movies in bed or browse the web before going to sleep , but honestly it is not worth the $ 500 price tag without the 2 features above .
I think I 'll just stick with my iPhone , thanks .
" Nice-to-haves " do not make product demand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I own a lot of Apple products and I must say I was very disappointed in this presentation.
Two major problems with the iPad will probably keep me from buying one.
1. LED backlit screen.
This seems strange given the existence of PixelQi and mirasol type LCD displays.
Not being able to read this outside really makes it useless as an ebook reader.
Oh, and also the 10 hours of reading time is simply pathetic for an eReader.
2. No camera?
What happened?
This is very disappointing.
I must admit I have, in the past, thought it would be cool to have a large version of my iPhone to view movies in bed or browse the web before going to sleep, but honestly it is not worth the $500 price tag without the 2 features above.
I think I'll just stick with my iPhone, thanks.
"Nice-to-haves" do not make product demand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672</id>
	<title>Typical techies and gadget freaks</title>
	<author>SoupIsGoodFood\_42</author>
	<datestamp>1264587000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After reading the comments here and on Engadget, it just confirms that your average techie doesn't know a great new product when he sees it. So many people seem to be complaining that it doesn't have some certain deal-breaking hardware feature, yet they haven't even noticed the most important innovation: The software. The greatest part of this device simply flies over the head of so many people here because they have no understanding about what makes a computer great to use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After reading the comments here and on Engadget , it just confirms that your average techie does n't know a great new product when he sees it .
So many people seem to be complaining that it does n't have some certain deal-breaking hardware feature , yet they have n't even noticed the most important innovation : The software .
The greatest part of this device simply flies over the head of so many people here because they have no understanding about what makes a computer great to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After reading the comments here and on Engadget, it just confirms that your average techie doesn't know a great new product when he sees it.
So many people seem to be complaining that it doesn't have some certain deal-breaking hardware feature, yet they haven't even noticed the most important innovation: The software.
The greatest part of this device simply flies over the head of so many people here because they have no understanding about what makes a computer great to use.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925036</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Swampash</author>
	<datestamp>1264588140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Flash is the number-one cause of application crashes on OS X, and it's outside Apple's control. No way Flash is going to be supported by Iphone or Ipad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Flash is the number-one cause of application crashes on OS X , and it 's outside Apple 's control .
No way Flash is going to be supported by Iphone or Ipad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flash is the number-one cause of application crashes on OS X, and it's outside Apple's control.
No way Flash is going to be supported by Iphone or Ipad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921812</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>LaminatorX</author>
	<datestamp>1264623120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it likely has as much to do with the impact of Flash's unquenchable thirst for CPU cycles on battery life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it likely has as much to do with the impact of Flash 's unquenchable thirst for CPU cycles on battery life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it likely has as much to do with the impact of Flash's unquenchable thirst for CPU cycles on battery life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30932842</id>
	<title>breakthrough deal with AT&amp;T</title>
	<author>jjmiv</author>
	<datestamp>1264692300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was hoping during this event that there would be other announcements during the Apple event.  I read reports of Apple stopping AT&amp;T's exclusivity of the iPhone and adding Verizon (and maybe T-Mobile) to the fold.  Well, I realized that it would take away too much from the iPad to announce something like that during the even that's supposed to feature Apple's landmark device.

There's one sign that makes me think that the exclusive with AT&amp;T will go away.  During the presentation Steve Jobs himself exclaimed a "breakthrough deal with AT&amp;T"  This makes me wonder if Apple approached AT&amp;T and stated "hey AT&amp;T we are going to end your exclusive access to the iPhone just because its good business for us.  But to show our appreciation, we want to give your first-negotiation rights with the iPad"  That's what makes me think the iPhone will be going to other carriers in the US.  Also, if the exclusivity deal ends in June, why would Apple announce it in January?  Makes more sense to wait till its closer.  That way people on Verizon aren't foaming at the mouth.

Anyways, I'm sorry if this has already been said, i Just didn't feel like reading through 876543 comments on this topic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was hoping during this event that there would be other announcements during the Apple event .
I read reports of Apple stopping AT&amp;T 's exclusivity of the iPhone and adding Verizon ( and maybe T-Mobile ) to the fold .
Well , I realized that it would take away too much from the iPad to announce something like that during the even that 's supposed to feature Apple 's landmark device .
There 's one sign that makes me think that the exclusive with AT&amp;T will go away .
During the presentation Steve Jobs himself exclaimed a " breakthrough deal with AT&amp;T " This makes me wonder if Apple approached AT&amp;T and stated " hey AT&amp;T we are going to end your exclusive access to the iPhone just because its good business for us .
But to show our appreciation , we want to give your first-negotiation rights with the iPad " That 's what makes me think the iPhone will be going to other carriers in the US .
Also , if the exclusivity deal ends in June , why would Apple announce it in January ?
Makes more sense to wait till its closer .
That way people on Verizon are n't foaming at the mouth .
Anyways , I 'm sorry if this has already been said , i Just did n't feel like reading through 876543 comments on this topic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was hoping during this event that there would be other announcements during the Apple event.
I read reports of Apple stopping AT&amp;T's exclusivity of the iPhone and adding Verizon (and maybe T-Mobile) to the fold.
Well, I realized that it would take away too much from the iPad to announce something like that during the even that's supposed to feature Apple's landmark device.
There's one sign that makes me think that the exclusive with AT&amp;T will go away.
During the presentation Steve Jobs himself exclaimed a "breakthrough deal with AT&amp;T"  This makes me wonder if Apple approached AT&amp;T and stated "hey AT&amp;T we are going to end your exclusive access to the iPhone just because its good business for us.
But to show our appreciation, we want to give your first-negotiation rights with the iPad"  That's what makes me think the iPhone will be going to other carriers in the US.
Also, if the exclusivity deal ends in June, why would Apple announce it in January?
Makes more sense to wait till its closer.
That way people on Verizon aren't foaming at the mouth.
Anyways, I'm sorry if this has already been said, i Just didn't feel like reading through 876543 comments on this topic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921536</id>
	<title>Wifi tethering with Android or Nokia, of course!</title>
	<author>pydev</author>
	<datestamp>1264622520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can use this as a mobile device by tethering it over Wifi to an Android or Noikia device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can use this as a mobile device by tethering it over Wifi to an Android or Noikia device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can use this as a mobile device by tethering it over Wifi to an Android or Noikia device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921362</id>
	<title>Perfect!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was looking at the iPhone the other day and I was just thinking that it would be so much better if it didn't fit into any of my pockets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was looking at the iPhone the other day and I was just thinking that it would be so much better if it did n't fit into any of my pockets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was looking at the iPhone the other day and I was just thinking that it would be so much better if it didn't fit into any of my pockets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924882</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm</title>
	<author>Myopic</author>
	<datestamp>1264587660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you saying that you have a netbook that can install third-party apps AND can get apps from the App Store? Wow, what netbook is that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you saying that you have a netbook that can install third-party apps AND can get apps from the App Store ?
Wow , what netbook is that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you saying that you have a netbook that can install third-party apps AND can get apps from the App Store?
Wow, what netbook is that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925290</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264588920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For those heavy data flow days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those heavy data flow days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those heavy data flow days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927830</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>mgblst</author>
	<datestamp>1264598520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really? So you have never heard of Microsoft and Windows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
So you have never heard of Microsoft and Windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
So you have never heard of Microsoft and Windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30936510</id>
	<title>Re:Something the world DIDN'T need...</title>
	<author>Big\_Mamma</author>
	<datestamp>1264704180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A quick comparison: <br> <br>

iPad: iPhone OS. T91MT: Windows 7 home premium included, runs any other x86 OS.<br>
iPad: No multitasking. T91MT: Yes. Even better with a $40 upgrade for a 2GB stick of ram.<br>
iPad: Safari only. T91MT: Firefox and Chrome for me, oh, and it has flash too. IE is also an option but noone uses that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P<br>
iPad: App store only. T91MT: Anything x86.<br>
iPad: Has notepad. T91MT: can run the full version of Office / Onenote, Windows Journal is free. Best hand writing recognition, has math support.<br>
iPad: SketchBook Mobile. Finger only. T91MT: SketchBook Pro, Corel Painter, Inkscape and lots more. Has stylus, only lack a pressure sensitive pen.<br>
iPad: Dockable keyboard. T91MT: Convertible tablet.<br> <br>

After a few weeks of serious use, I must say that while having a touch screen is a major plus, you won't be entering a lot of text with the on screen keyboard. Seriously, even a longer url can take a while to write with tapping letters or writing and correcting letters, and complex passwords have a random chance to fail. I only use the tablet mode during note taking, browsing the read-only web, watching videos and reading pdfs in full screen mode, the speed difference in text entry is just too large. Be ready to bring the wireless keyboard with the iPad all the time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A quick comparison : iPad : iPhone OS .
T91MT : Windows 7 home premium included , runs any other x86 OS .
iPad : No multitasking .
T91MT : Yes .
Even better with a $ 40 upgrade for a 2GB stick of ram .
iPad : Safari only .
T91MT : Firefox and Chrome for me , oh , and it has flash too .
IE is also an option but noone uses that : P iPad : App store only .
T91MT : Anything x86 .
iPad : Has notepad .
T91MT : can run the full version of Office / Onenote , Windows Journal is free .
Best hand writing recognition , has math support .
iPad : SketchBook Mobile .
Finger only .
T91MT : SketchBook Pro , Corel Painter , Inkscape and lots more .
Has stylus , only lack a pressure sensitive pen .
iPad : Dockable keyboard .
T91MT : Convertible tablet .
After a few weeks of serious use , I must say that while having a touch screen is a major plus , you wo n't be entering a lot of text with the on screen keyboard .
Seriously , even a longer url can take a while to write with tapping letters or writing and correcting letters , and complex passwords have a random chance to fail .
I only use the tablet mode during note taking , browsing the read-only web , watching videos and reading pdfs in full screen mode , the speed difference in text entry is just too large .
Be ready to bring the wireless keyboard with the iPad all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A quick comparison:  

iPad: iPhone OS.
T91MT: Windows 7 home premium included, runs any other x86 OS.
iPad: No multitasking.
T91MT: Yes.
Even better with a $40 upgrade for a 2GB stick of ram.
iPad: Safari only.
T91MT: Firefox and Chrome for me, oh, and it has flash too.
IE is also an option but noone uses that :P
iPad: App store only.
T91MT: Anything x86.
iPad: Has notepad.
T91MT: can run the full version of Office / Onenote, Windows Journal is free.
Best hand writing recognition, has math support.
iPad: SketchBook Mobile.
Finger only.
T91MT: SketchBook Pro, Corel Painter, Inkscape and lots more.
Has stylus, only lack a pressure sensitive pen.
iPad: Dockable keyboard.
T91MT: Convertible tablet.
After a few weeks of serious use, I must say that while having a touch screen is a major plus, you won't be entering a lot of text with the on screen keyboard.
Seriously, even a longer url can take a while to write with tapping letters or writing and correcting letters, and complex passwords have a random chance to fail.
I only use the tablet mode during note taking, browsing the read-only web, watching videos and reading pdfs in full screen mode, the speed difference in text entry is just too large.
Be ready to bring the wireless keyboard with the iPad all the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927332</id>
	<title>score sheet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264595700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ipod vs sony walkman + rest of world : 1 - nil</p><p>iphone vs nokia + rest of world : 1 - nil</p><p>ipad vs rest of world: take a guess</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ipod vs sony walkman + rest of world : 1 - niliphone vs nokia + rest of world : 1 - nilipad vs rest of world : take a guess  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>ipod vs sony walkman + rest of world : 1 - niliphone vs nokia + rest of world : 1 - nilipad vs rest of world: take a guess
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921996</id>
	<title>*yawn*</title>
	<author>0xdeadbeef</author>
	<datestamp>1264623480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No WiMAX. Same storage as an iPod. Lame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No WiMAX .
Same storage as an iPod .
Lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No WiMAX.
Same storage as an iPod.
Lame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921918</id>
	<title>Re:No 3g?</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1264623300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, there you go, for those who enjoy paying their cell company twice, there's one with 3G and accompanying data plan!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , there you go , for those who enjoy paying their cell company twice , there 's one with 3G and accompanying data plan !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, there you go, for those who enjoy paying their cell company twice, there's one with 3G and accompanying data plan!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254</id>
	<title>What is the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264621980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't this just a big expensive iPod touch now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this just a big expensive iPod touch now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this just a big expensive iPod touch now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921740</id>
	<title>Good enough?</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1264622940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its:</p><ul><li>an portable media player (ala iPod) that won't fit in your pocket, and</li><li>a netbook where the entry surface is fixed with the viewing surface rather than at an adjustable angle from it, and</li><li>a nearly-full-page sized e-reader with a backlit rather than reflective screen.</li></ul><p>The question is will it be good enough in each of these roles that the compromises make it worthwhile?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its : an portable media player ( ala iPod ) that wo n't fit in your pocket , anda netbook where the entry surface is fixed with the viewing surface rather than at an adjustable angle from it , anda nearly-full-page sized e-reader with a backlit rather than reflective screen.The question is will it be good enough in each of these roles that the compromises make it worthwhile ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its:an portable media player (ala iPod) that won't fit in your pocket, anda netbook where the entry surface is fixed with the viewing surface rather than at an adjustable angle from it, anda nearly-full-page sized e-reader with a backlit rather than reflective screen.The question is will it be good enough in each of these roles that the compromises make it worthwhile?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931284</id>
	<title>Re:Pricing announced</title>
	<author>SimonTheSoundMan</author>
	<datestamp>1264677240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The capacities are also 16, 32 and 64 GB.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The capacities are also 16 , 32 and 64 GB .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The capacities are also 16, 32 and 64 GB.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931234</id>
	<title>Re:Apple A4</title>
	<author>klui</author>
	<datestamp>1264676580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am intrigued by the A4 as well, but this "news for nerds" site had less than a doze messages to discussing the CPU while of it talked about how it lacks xyz, abc, blah blah blah.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am intrigued by the A4 as well , but this " news for nerds " site had less than a doze messages to discussing the CPU while of it talked about how it lacks xyz , abc , blah blah blah .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am intrigued by the A4 as well, but this "news for nerds" site had less than a doze messages to discussing the CPU while of it talked about how it lacks xyz, abc, blah blah blah.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928416</id>
	<title>We need a better quote for this thing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264602180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No 3G yet.  Less space than an iPod.  Lame!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No 3G yet .
Less space than an iPod .
Lame !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No 3G yet.
Less space than an iPod.
Lame!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925146</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264588500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never thought I'd see anything from MadTV modded 'funny'...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never thought I 'd see anything from MadTV modded 'funny'.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never thought I'd see anything from MadTV modded 'funny'...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30930128</id>
	<title>Re:Typical techies and gadget freaks</title>
	<author>indiechild</author>
	<datestamp>1264619820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And why is that absurd? The OS and software is what distinguishes most phones and gadgets these days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And why is that absurd ?
The OS and software is what distinguishes most phones and gadgets these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And why is that absurd?
The OS and software is what distinguishes most phones and gadgets these days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921460</id>
	<title>iPad</title>
	<author>dark42</author>
	<datestamp>1264622340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No WWAN. Less space than an Eee PC. Lame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No WWAN .
Less space than an Eee PC .
Lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No WWAN.
Less space than an Eee PC.
Lame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927980</id>
	<title>Re:iPad Alternatives</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264599480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look buddy if you want to make a desktop environment for Linux that is as usable as something that comes out of Apple, then please for the love of everything good in this world, get started.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look buddy if you want to make a desktop environment for Linux that is as usable as something that comes out of Apple , then please for the love of everything good in this world , get started .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look buddy if you want to make a desktop environment for Linux that is as usable as something that comes out of Apple, then please for the love of everything good in this world, get started.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921212</id>
	<title>price?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264621860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>price?</htmltext>
<tokenext>price ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>price?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922550</id>
	<title>Whats new?</title>
	<author>plague911</author>
	<datestamp>1264624680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What can the "crap-pad" do that cant already be done by a different device? It seems like apple made the iphone a little large or they made a tablet PC which can play iphone apps. This is not a new device at best its a product refresh..</htmltext>
<tokenext>What can the " crap-pad " do that cant already be done by a different device ?
It seems like apple made the iphone a little large or they made a tablet PC which can play iphone apps .
This is not a new device at best its a product refresh. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What can the "crap-pad" do that cant already be done by a different device?
It seems like apple made the iphone a little large or they made a tablet PC which can play iphone apps.
This is not a new device at best its a product refresh..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922500</id>
	<title>Re:No 3g?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>With no 3G I suddenly don't want one. I love my iPhone and thought this would be great for watching videos and surfing on the couch, but I also want to take it places where I don't have wifi and in the modern age, most things you do require the internet. Seems silly to not include that.</p></div><p>It DOES have 3G, and it's UNLOCKED. Just pick a carrier that offers Micro SIM cards, and go...</p><p>If anyone would watch any of the live blogs before posting, you would see that there are two versions: With and without 3G. The 3G models cost $130 more, and will be released 30 days after the initial Wifi-only versions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>With no 3G I suddenly do n't want one .
I love my iPhone and thought this would be great for watching videos and surfing on the couch , but I also want to take it places where I do n't have wifi and in the modern age , most things you do require the internet .
Seems silly to not include that.It DOES have 3G , and it 's UNLOCKED .
Just pick a carrier that offers Micro SIM cards , and go...If anyone would watch any of the live blogs before posting , you would see that there are two versions : With and without 3G .
The 3G models cost $ 130 more , and will be released 30 days after the initial Wifi-only versions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With no 3G I suddenly don't want one.
I love my iPhone and thought this would be great for watching videos and surfing on the couch, but I also want to take it places where I don't have wifi and in the modern age, most things you do require the internet.
Seems silly to not include that.It DOES have 3G, and it's UNLOCKED.
Just pick a carrier that offers Micro SIM cards, and go...If anyone would watch any of the live blogs before posting, you would see that there are two versions: With and without 3G.
The 3G models cost $130 more, and will be released 30 days after the initial Wifi-only versions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926234</id>
	<title>Some people just don't get it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264591740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone is trying to make a computer smaller, Apple is creating a platform to fill a gap that paper still reigns over. It's the first step into a bold world we like to think of in future. You've got to applaud the effort and courage not to make another netbook. Succeed for fail, it's progress--not just another tiny laptop.</p><p>Now, about that flying car thing....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone is trying to make a computer smaller , Apple is creating a platform to fill a gap that paper still reigns over .
It 's the first step into a bold world we like to think of in future .
You 've got to applaud the effort and courage not to make another netbook .
Succeed for fail , it 's progress--not just another tiny laptop.Now , about that flying car thing... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone is trying to make a computer smaller, Apple is creating a platform to fill a gap that paper still reigns over.
It's the first step into a bold world we like to think of in future.
You've got to applaud the effort and courage not to make another netbook.
Succeed for fail, it's progress--not just another tiny laptop.Now, about that flying car thing....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931782</id>
	<title>Fujitsu iPAD</title>
	<author>haploc</author>
	<datestamp>1264684020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now this will become an interesting legal fight.</p><p>Fujitsu iPAD (scroll down)<br><a href="http://www.fujitsu.com/us/services/retailing/technology/hardware/?navid=608#" title="fujitsu.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.fujitsu.com/us/services/retailing/technology/hardware/?navid=608#</a> [fujitsu.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now this will become an interesting legal fight.Fujitsu iPAD ( scroll down ) http : //www.fujitsu.com/us/services/retailing/technology/hardware/ ? navid = 608 # [ fujitsu.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now this will become an interesting legal fight.Fujitsu iPAD (scroll down)http://www.fujitsu.com/us/services/retailing/technology/hardware/?navid=608# [fujitsu.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929322</id>
	<title>it's a lie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264610340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only is it just a Cortex A8 with extra SoC features integrated, the features integrated are similar to the last chip (SGX graphics, etc).</p><p>And it wasn't even done by PA Semi, it was done by the same people as before, mostly John Mansfield's group! I have no idea why Apple decided to rebrand this chip as being from someone it isn't from. Lying is apparently second nature to Steve Jobs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only is it just a Cortex A8 with extra SoC features integrated , the features integrated are similar to the last chip ( SGX graphics , etc ) .And it was n't even done by PA Semi , it was done by the same people as before , mostly John Mansfield 's group !
I have no idea why Apple decided to rebrand this chip as being from someone it is n't from .
Lying is apparently second nature to Steve Jobs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only is it just a Cortex A8 with extra SoC features integrated, the features integrated are similar to the last chip (SGX graphics, etc).And it wasn't even done by PA Semi, it was done by the same people as before, mostly John Mansfield's group!
I have no idea why Apple decided to rebrand this chip as being from someone it isn't from.
Lying is apparently second nature to Steve Jobs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923248</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264583160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess they figured only childish idiots would make the association, and who cares about useless zeros like that?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess they figured only childish idiots would make the association , and who cares about useless zeros like that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess they figured only childish idiots would make the association, and who cares about useless zeros like that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923394</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>xactuary</author>
	<datestamp>1264583580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it does, I didn't see it. But then again, engadget failed on me 25 times during the presentations.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it does , I did n't see it .
But then again , engadget failed on me 25 times during the presentations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it does, I didn't see it.
But then again, engadget failed on me 25 times during the presentations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921538</id>
	<title>Re:No WCMDA/HSPA or even CDMA/EVDO is a huge miss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>wifi is in Starbucks, Mcdonolds, bars &amp; cafes, and all other cool places where people will hang out with these things.
<p>
Universities and colleges all have strong wifi coverage
</p><p>
wait for Rev. B!
</p><p>
Apple will sell millions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wifi is in Starbucks , Mcdonolds , bars &amp; cafes , and all other cool places where people will hang out with these things .
Universities and colleges all have strong wifi coverage wait for Rev .
B ! Apple will sell millions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wifi is in Starbucks, Mcdonolds, bars &amp; cafes, and all other cool places where people will hang out with these things.
Universities and colleges all have strong wifi coverage

wait for Rev.
B!

Apple will sell millions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922468</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because I won't buy the device.  No Flash means no paid streaming either, like Crunchyroll, where most shows aren't on itunes at all.</p><p>It's a multiply locked device, both in hardware, software, and content.  Damn nice, but useless for what I was waiting for without Flash.</p><p>Only way I'll get it is if I can find a way to take a Flash stream like Hulu and dump it to drive, re-encode, and serve it up.</p><p>No too is DAMN stupid.</p><p>And I can't find out what the screen res is.  It just says doubling, which means no 720p.</p><p>Good pricing, but for the price of the 3G 64GB, I can pick up a damn damn nice Sony Vaio.  I want to like the device, and in my respects it works, but the lockdowns are IRRITATING as hell to the point it's freaking useless for a lot of video streaming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because I wo n't buy the device .
No Flash means no paid streaming either , like Crunchyroll , where most shows are n't on itunes at all.It 's a multiply locked device , both in hardware , software , and content .
Damn nice , but useless for what I was waiting for without Flash.Only way I 'll get it is if I can find a way to take a Flash stream like Hulu and dump it to drive , re-encode , and serve it up.No too is DAMN stupid.And I ca n't find out what the screen res is .
It just says doubling , which means no 720p.Good pricing , but for the price of the 3G 64GB , I can pick up a damn damn nice Sony Vaio .
I want to like the device , and in my respects it works , but the lockdowns are IRRITATING as hell to the point it 's freaking useless for a lot of video streaming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because I won't buy the device.
No Flash means no paid streaming either, like Crunchyroll, where most shows aren't on itunes at all.It's a multiply locked device, both in hardware, software, and content.
Damn nice, but useless for what I was waiting for without Flash.Only way I'll get it is if I can find a way to take a Flash stream like Hulu and dump it to drive, re-encode, and serve it up.No too is DAMN stupid.And I can't find out what the screen res is.
It just says doubling, which means no 720p.Good pricing, but for the price of the 3G 64GB, I can pick up a damn damn nice Sony Vaio.
I want to like the device, and in my respects it works, but the lockdowns are IRRITATING as hell to the point it's freaking useless for a lot of video streaming.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929082</id>
	<title>Screen Replacement Industry</title>
	<author>exomondo</author>
	<datestamp>1264607880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whoa these guys will be loving these new tablets. Replacement screens for an iphone are expensive enough, the cost to replace the glass on a broken 9.7" screen is going to be huge!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoa these guys will be loving these new tablets .
Replacement screens for an iphone are expensive enough , the cost to replace the glass on a broken 9.7 " screen is going to be huge !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoa these guys will be loving these new tablets.
Replacement screens for an iphone are expensive enough, the cost to replace the glass on a broken 9.7" screen is going to be huge!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925928</id>
	<title>No Multitasking</title>
	<author>HermMunster</author>
	<datestamp>1264590780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It does not multitask.  Enough said.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does not multitask .
Enough said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It does not multitask.
Enough said.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922730</id>
	<title>No stylus eh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264625100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see nothing about stylus support, guess I won't be buying one then.</p><p>It would have been a perfect device with stylus support, now it's just not for me (although I do see a lot of possibilities for others).</p><p>/Mikael</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see nothing about stylus support , guess I wo n't be buying one then.It would have been a perfect device with stylus support , now it 's just not for me ( although I do see a lot of possibilities for others ) ./Mikael</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see nothing about stylus support, guess I won't be buying one then.It would have been a perfect device with stylus support, now it's just not for me (although I do see a lot of possibilities for others)./Mikael</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923534</id>
	<title>Re:time to put "i" names out to pasture</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264583820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a money saving scheme.  They already have the tools to print iPod logos<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... so now all they need is a sharpie to change their stickers and marketing material to iPad...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a money saving scheme .
They already have the tools to print iPod logos ... so now all they need is a sharpie to change their stickers and marketing material to iPad.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a money saving scheme.
They already have the tools to print iPod logos ... so now all they need is a sharpie to change their stickers and marketing material to iPad...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925336</id>
	<title>reading on the thing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264589100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ya know. there's all this touting this iPad thingy for book readin'. it has just occurred to me that the reason my iPod touch is fine for reading might be *because* it's so small. the amount of light hitting my eye, and the amount of light-bleed from the bits that don't have words is just much smaller. maybe apple's done something clever with the 'page' background to mitigate the effects of the glowiness; but otherwise, even if super-high res: it'd be a lot like reading on a laptop.</p><p>so far, not impressed. the tech's heading in the right direction; but i'm holding out to see if mirasol's worth a d@mn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ya know .
there 's all this touting this iPad thingy for book readin' .
it has just occurred to me that the reason my iPod touch is fine for reading might be * because * it 's so small .
the amount of light hitting my eye , and the amount of light-bleed from the bits that do n't have words is just much smaller .
maybe apple 's done something clever with the 'page ' background to mitigate the effects of the glowiness ; but otherwise , even if super-high res : it 'd be a lot like reading on a laptop.so far , not impressed .
the tech 's heading in the right direction ; but i 'm holding out to see if mirasol 's worth a d @ mn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ya know.
there's all this touting this iPad thingy for book readin'.
it has just occurred to me that the reason my iPod touch is fine for reading might be *because* it's so small.
the amount of light hitting my eye, and the amount of light-bleed from the bits that don't have words is just much smaller.
maybe apple's done something clever with the 'page' background to mitigate the effects of the glowiness; but otherwise, even if super-high res: it'd be a lot like reading on a laptop.so far, not impressed.
the tech's heading in the right direction; but i'm holding out to see if mirasol's worth a d@mn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926462</id>
	<title>Steve's Presentation</title>
	<author>bradgoodman</author>
	<datestamp>1264592460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think Steve's presentation said it all - not only was the on-screen keyboard too cumbersome for him to even type a small email message, but he lacked his usual cocky showmanship - he reminded me more of Balmer or someone - try to make a hard pitch for little things that weren't that impressive. You can tell when someone is trying to feign excitement.

I would say I was "let down" - I envisioned a "bigger iPhone", but was hoping to be wowed by some new, unexpected ingenious new Apple thing.

It kind of reminded me of the "eMate"....</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Steve 's presentation said it all - not only was the on-screen keyboard too cumbersome for him to even type a small email message , but he lacked his usual cocky showmanship - he reminded me more of Balmer or someone - try to make a hard pitch for little things that were n't that impressive .
You can tell when someone is trying to feign excitement .
I would say I was " let down " - I envisioned a " bigger iPhone " , but was hoping to be wowed by some new , unexpected ingenious new Apple thing .
It kind of reminded me of the " eMate " ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Steve's presentation said it all - not only was the on-screen keyboard too cumbersome for him to even type a small email message, but he lacked his usual cocky showmanship - he reminded me more of Balmer or someone - try to make a hard pitch for little things that weren't that impressive.
You can tell when someone is trying to feign excitement.
I would say I was "let down" - I envisioned a "bigger iPhone", but was hoping to be wowed by some new, unexpected ingenious new Apple thing.
It kind of reminded me of the "eMate"....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925384</id>
	<title>Because I wasnt funny enough to think of it myself</title>
	<author>Eggbloke</author>
	<datestamp>1264589220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://newstechnica.com/2010/01/27/apple-launches-ipad-for-that-time-of-imonth/" title="newstechnica.com" rel="nofollow">http://newstechnica.com/2010/01/27/apple-launches-ipad-for-that-time-of-imonth/</a> [newstechnica.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //newstechnica.com/2010/01/27/apple-launches-ipad-for-that-time-of-imonth/ [ newstechnica.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://newstechnica.com/2010/01/27/apple-launches-ipad-for-that-time-of-imonth/ [newstechnica.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921998</id>
	<title>Big disappointment.</title>
	<author>dannydawg5</author>
	<datestamp>1264623480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More like an iPod Touch that won't fit in your pocket.  There's no phone.  I'd've been be much, much more impressed if it ran Mac OS X and not iPhone OS.  That decision greatly cripples what the device can do.</p><p>I'm not impressed seeing the Facebook iPhone app running on it.  I can run the full-version Facebook in Firefox on my $300 netbook.  However, I suppose I can't install iFart on my netbook, but I'm sure I could find a worthwhile desktop replacement for that.  At least I have that option.  I'm not tied to the App store like the iPad.  There's no Flash either.  That means there is no Hulu on any other flash-based content streaming service.</p><p>This is an expensive netbook without software customization and without a keyboard.  No thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More like an iPod Touch that wo n't fit in your pocket .
There 's no phone .
I 'd've been be much , much more impressed if it ran Mac OS X and not iPhone OS .
That decision greatly cripples what the device can do.I 'm not impressed seeing the Facebook iPhone app running on it .
I can run the full-version Facebook in Firefox on my $ 300 netbook .
However , I suppose I ca n't install iFart on my netbook , but I 'm sure I could find a worthwhile desktop replacement for that .
At least I have that option .
I 'm not tied to the App store like the iPad .
There 's no Flash either .
That means there is no Hulu on any other flash-based content streaming service.This is an expensive netbook without software customization and without a keyboard .
No thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More like an iPod Touch that won't fit in your pocket.
There's no phone.
I'd've been be much, much more impressed if it ran Mac OS X and not iPhone OS.
That decision greatly cripples what the device can do.I'm not impressed seeing the Facebook iPhone app running on it.
I can run the full-version Facebook in Firefox on my $300 netbook.
However, I suppose I can't install iFart on my netbook, but I'm sure I could find a worthwhile desktop replacement for that.
At least I have that option.
I'm not tied to the App store like the iPad.
There's no Flash either.
That means there is no Hulu on any other flash-based content streaming service.This is an expensive netbook without software customization and without a keyboard.
No thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928300</id>
	<title>watching movies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264601340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone is sure to come out with an aftermarket folding stand so you can prop it up to watch movies. Though I would hate to carry more crap, it would be nice w/ bluetooth headphones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone is sure to come out with an aftermarket folding stand so you can prop it up to watch movies .
Though I would hate to carry more crap , it would be nice w/ bluetooth headphones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone is sure to come out with an aftermarket folding stand so you can prop it up to watch movies.
Though I would hate to carry more crap, it would be nice w/ bluetooth headphones.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922870</id>
	<title>Some possible design flaws</title>
	<author>OG</author>
	<datestamp>1264625400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) While it's nice that it has a keyboard dock, it appears that the dock may only support the iPad in portrait mode (they placement of the connector on the long side of the iPad made it seem a bit precarious for putting in a docked mode).</p><p>2) Nothing said about mouse support.  Seriously, if I'm going to be using it for any type of document creation (and they seem to think people will, as they're providing iWorks in the app store), I don't want to have to use the screen for copy and paste.  Lack of mouse support would be a killer for me.</p><p>3) Main screen is nothing but icons to get into applications.  With more screen real estate there should be support for widgets on the home screen (as I understand it, iPhones and iPod touches don't allow that--one must jailbreak a phone and do it manually).</p><p>I'm sure there are more, but those are some things that pop right out at me.  As others have said, it really looks like the worst of both worlds.  Not as portable as a smartphone, not as good at document creation as a netbook or notebook.  eBooks, papers, and mags seem to be the only things to gain from this device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) While it 's nice that it has a keyboard dock , it appears that the dock may only support the iPad in portrait mode ( they placement of the connector on the long side of the iPad made it seem a bit precarious for putting in a docked mode ) .2 ) Nothing said about mouse support .
Seriously , if I 'm going to be using it for any type of document creation ( and they seem to think people will , as they 're providing iWorks in the app store ) , I do n't want to have to use the screen for copy and paste .
Lack of mouse support would be a killer for me.3 ) Main screen is nothing but icons to get into applications .
With more screen real estate there should be support for widgets on the home screen ( as I understand it , iPhones and iPod touches do n't allow that--one must jailbreak a phone and do it manually ) .I 'm sure there are more , but those are some things that pop right out at me .
As others have said , it really looks like the worst of both worlds .
Not as portable as a smartphone , not as good at document creation as a netbook or notebook .
eBooks , papers , and mags seem to be the only things to gain from this device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) While it's nice that it has a keyboard dock, it appears that the dock may only support the iPad in portrait mode (they placement of the connector on the long side of the iPad made it seem a bit precarious for putting in a docked mode).2) Nothing said about mouse support.
Seriously, if I'm going to be using it for any type of document creation (and they seem to think people will, as they're providing iWorks in the app store), I don't want to have to use the screen for copy and paste.
Lack of mouse support would be a killer for me.3) Main screen is nothing but icons to get into applications.
With more screen real estate there should be support for widgets on the home screen (as I understand it, iPhones and iPod touches don't allow that--one must jailbreak a phone and do it manually).I'm sure there are more, but those are some things that pop right out at me.
As others have said, it really looks like the worst of both worlds.
Not as portable as a smartphone, not as good at document creation as a netbook or notebook.
eBooks, papers, and mags seem to be the only things to gain from this device.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925614</id>
	<title>Re:The iPad is a Platform</title>
	<author>nickyj</author>
	<datestamp>1264589820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Most people just want stuff to work, and don't want to care how.</p></div><p>Flash will not just work.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most people just want stuff to work , and do n't want to care how.Flash will not just work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most people just want stuff to work, and don't want to care how.Flash will not just work.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921862</id>
	<title>iFad?</title>
	<author>bertramwooster</author>
	<datestamp>1264623240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>iFad - 'nuff said<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>iFad - 'nuff said : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iFad - 'nuff said :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927644</id>
	<title>Re:This fits squarely in the category of "meh"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264597440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like lounging around with both my iphone and my laptop. The iphone fits squarely in my palm, the laptop can rest snuggly on my knees. I am not sure how the iPad will fit into my sofa/ass relationship. Also on occasion i need to browse with one hand, (ahem) this new design does not seem condusive to that!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like lounging around with both my iphone and my laptop .
The iphone fits squarely in my palm , the laptop can rest snuggly on my knees .
I am not sure how the iPad will fit into my sofa/ass relationship .
Also on occasion i need to browse with one hand , ( ahem ) this new design does not seem condusive to that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like lounging around with both my iphone and my laptop.
The iphone fits squarely in my palm, the laptop can rest snuggly on my knees.
I am not sure how the iPad will fit into my sofa/ass relationship.
Also on occasion i need to browse with one hand, (ahem) this new design does not seem condusive to that!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922806</id>
	<title>Re:Watching the presentation live...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264625280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wonder how well the iPad will handle those heavy [work] flow days.</p></div><p>You'll need the maxi size iPad, or switch to the iTampon, on your heaviest days.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how well the iPad will handle those heavy [ work ] flow days.You 'll need the maxi size iPad , or switch to the iTampon , on your heaviest days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how well the iPad will handle those heavy [work] flow days.You'll need the maxi size iPad, or switch to the iTampon, on your heaviest days.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921956</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1264623360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>What an unfortunate name. One could conceiveably think that Apple is delving into the untapped market of network-enabled feminine hygiene products.</i></p><p>You're thinking of the second generation yet to be released iPad Maxi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What an unfortunate name .
One could conceiveably think that Apple is delving into the untapped market of network-enabled feminine hygiene products.You 're thinking of the second generation yet to be released iPad Maxi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What an unfortunate name.
One could conceiveably think that Apple is delving into the untapped market of network-enabled feminine hygiene products.You're thinking of the second generation yet to be released iPad Maxi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921888</id>
	<title>Re:No WCMDA/HSPA or even CDMA/EVDO is a huge miss</title>
	<author>CSHARP123</author>
	<datestamp>1264623240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are going to have 3G with this</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are going to have 3G with this</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are going to have 3G with this</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922166</id>
	<title>It has a keyboard!</title>
	<author>slimjim8094</author>
	<datestamp>1264623780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>as a dock accessory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>as a dock accessory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as a dock accessory.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923208</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264583040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It appears that Apple has taken a page from Nintendo's thinking. "I'm gonna go home, turn off all the lights, and play with my Wii hahahaalolz" is going to become "Hey come look at my iTampon hahahaalolz."  Every incredibly obvious joke is free advertising for Apple.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It appears that Apple has taken a page from Nintendo 's thinking .
" I 'm gon na go home , turn off all the lights , and play with my Wii hahahaalolz " is going to become " Hey come look at my iTampon hahahaalolz .
" Every incredibly obvious joke is free advertising for Apple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It appears that Apple has taken a page from Nintendo's thinking.
"I'm gonna go home, turn off all the lights, and play with my Wii hahahaalolz" is going to become "Hey come look at my iTampon hahahaalolz.
"  Every incredibly obvious joke is free advertising for Apple.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922484</id>
	<title>No contract need for 3G!</title>
	<author>WiiVault</author>
	<datestamp>1264624560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unlocked, MicroSIM compatible. SOLD</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unlocked , MicroSIM compatible .
SOLD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unlocked, MicroSIM compatible.
SOLD</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929140</id>
	<title>Yes. This is the year</title>
	<author>snowwrestler</author>
	<datestamp>1264608540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the year of Linux on the lap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the year of Linux on the lap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the year of Linux on the lap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925432</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>tendays</author>
	<datestamp>1264589340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That video got deleted for not complying to site rules or something. What was it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That video got deleted for not complying to site rules or something .
What was it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That video got deleted for not complying to site rules or something.
What was it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924286</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Lemmy Caution</author>
	<datestamp>1264585860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, you do power it up by holding down the period key...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , you do power it up by holding down the period key.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, you do power it up by holding down the period key...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931588</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>nick.cash</author>
	<datestamp>1264680780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even on Windows (yeah, I know... I'm forced to use it at work, same story as everyone else), it's the only real program that ever seems to cause crashes. In my case, I listen to last.fm all day long, and occasionally when opening multiple tabs where one tab is loading and I'm trying to open others, it totally crashes Firefox. Without Flash, this never happens.</p><p>This shouldn't be hard to avoid, given what Flash does. I can only assume that it's a poorly written program.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even on Windows ( yeah , I know... I 'm forced to use it at work , same story as everyone else ) , it 's the only real program that ever seems to cause crashes .
In my case , I listen to last.fm all day long , and occasionally when opening multiple tabs where one tab is loading and I 'm trying to open others , it totally crashes Firefox .
Without Flash , this never happens.This should n't be hard to avoid , given what Flash does .
I can only assume that it 's a poorly written program .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even on Windows (yeah, I know... I'm forced to use it at work, same story as everyone else), it's the only real program that ever seems to cause crashes.
In my case, I listen to last.fm all day long, and occasionally when opening multiple tabs where one tab is loading and I'm trying to open others, it totally crashes Firefox.
Without Flash, this never happens.This shouldn't be hard to avoid, given what Flash does.
I can only assume that it's a poorly written program.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927062</id>
	<title>Will it blend?</title>
	<author>GuyFawkes</author>
	<datestamp>1264594440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cos I can't see any other use for it, unless you're a fanboi...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cos I ca n't see any other use for it , unless you 're a fanboi.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cos I can't see any other use for it, unless you're a fanboi...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927278</id>
	<title>Re:iPad Alternatives</title>
	<author>sapphire wyvern</author>
	<datestamp>1264595400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And, in the end, the deals with Big Content will *still* make the Apple product a million times more successful than the open community's version can achieve, even despite superior feature sets. This thing's not for doing work on; it's a media consumption device (web, streaming movies, streaming tv, ebooks). I suspect the best use of the App Store on this machine will be semi-portable gaming since the iPad doesn't have the in-pocket portability of the iPhones and iPod Touches. So yeah... if this thing succeeds at all, it'll be thanks to Apple's ability to get its customers to hand over money to Big Content via iTunes, and the associated love that Big Content has for Apple.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And , in the end , the deals with Big Content will * still * make the Apple product a million times more successful than the open community 's version can achieve , even despite superior feature sets .
This thing 's not for doing work on ; it 's a media consumption device ( web , streaming movies , streaming tv , ebooks ) .
I suspect the best use of the App Store on this machine will be semi-portable gaming since the iPad does n't have the in-pocket portability of the iPhones and iPod Touches .
So yeah... if this thing succeeds at all , it 'll be thanks to Apple 's ability to get its customers to hand over money to Big Content via iTunes , and the associated love that Big Content has for Apple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And, in the end, the deals with Big Content will *still* make the Apple product a million times more successful than the open community's version can achieve, even despite superior feature sets.
This thing's not for doing work on; it's a media consumption device (web, streaming movies, streaming tv, ebooks).
I suspect the best use of the App Store on this machine will be semi-portable gaming since the iPad doesn't have the in-pocket portability of the iPhones and iPod Touches.
So yeah... if this thing succeeds at all, it'll be thanks to Apple's ability to get its customers to hand over money to Big Content via iTunes, and the associated love that Big Content has for Apple.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922058</id>
	<title>Re:Yes but...</title>
	<author>flanksteak</author>
	<datestamp>1264623600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only when you have multiple iPads in a Beowulf cluster.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only when you have multiple iPads in a Beowulf cluster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only when you have multiple iPads in a Beowulf cluster.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921560</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The downside of these new network enabled feminine hygiene products is that you have give it over to your wife for 3 days every month.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The downside of these new network enabled feminine hygiene products is that you have give it over to your wife for 3 days every month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The downside of these new network enabled feminine hygiene products is that you have give it over to your wife for 3 days every month.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923584</id>
	<title>iWhat</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264584000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iWhat? uSuck!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iWhat ?
uSuck !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iWhat?
uSuck!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925582</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264589760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it doesn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it does n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it doesn't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926162</id>
	<title>It's not a "custom A4"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264591500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a standard ARM Cortex A8 core. And it's no more custom than the last chip (which was also customized).</p><p>This is just marketing. Ridiculous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a standard ARM Cortex A8 core .
And it 's no more custom than the last chip ( which was also customized ) .This is just marketing .
Ridiculous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a standard ARM Cortex A8 core.
And it's no more custom than the last chip (which was also customized).This is just marketing.
Ridiculous.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922848</id>
	<title>Sure, but</title>
	<author>zookeeperme</author>
	<datestamp>1264625340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>does it <a href="http://www.thedoghousediaries.com/?p=1234" title="thedoghousediaries.com" rel="nofollow">make coffee</a> [thedoghousediaries.com]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>does it make coffee [ thedoghousediaries.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>does it make coffee [thedoghousediaries.com]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923150</id>
	<title>Re:Error in the article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264582920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only does it support 3G, but it's an unlocked 3G device that requires no contract to activate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only does it support 3G , but it 's an unlocked 3G device that requires no contract to activate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only does it support 3G, but it's an unlocked 3G device that requires no contract to activate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923126</id>
	<title>Disappointing.</title>
	<author>MaWeiTao</author>
	<datestamp>1264582860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This thing would have been far more appealing to me if it ran a customized version of OSX, in essence making it a more portable alternative to a laptop. Instead we get a glorified iPod touch chained, as are those devices, to the app store. While a tablet PC is very appealing to me I can get a netbook, which offers more functionality, for less money.</p><p>And I'm convinced neither the iPod nor this thing supports Flash for the simple reason that it would undermine the app store. As it stands this thing is pretty disappointing. I was looking forward to a proper tablet PC. Way better than a laptop or phone he says when for me it's got the worst of both. It's too big to carry around like an iPhone and doesn't have nearly the functionality of a laptop, at least not without being nickel and dimed for that functionality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This thing would have been far more appealing to me if it ran a customized version of OSX , in essence making it a more portable alternative to a laptop .
Instead we get a glorified iPod touch chained , as are those devices , to the app store .
While a tablet PC is very appealing to me I can get a netbook , which offers more functionality , for less money.And I 'm convinced neither the iPod nor this thing supports Flash for the simple reason that it would undermine the app store .
As it stands this thing is pretty disappointing .
I was looking forward to a proper tablet PC .
Way better than a laptop or phone he says when for me it 's got the worst of both .
It 's too big to carry around like an iPhone and does n't have nearly the functionality of a laptop , at least not without being nickel and dimed for that functionality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This thing would have been far more appealing to me if it ran a customized version of OSX, in essence making it a more portable alternative to a laptop.
Instead we get a glorified iPod touch chained, as are those devices, to the app store.
While a tablet PC is very appealing to me I can get a netbook, which offers more functionality, for less money.And I'm convinced neither the iPod nor this thing supports Flash for the simple reason that it would undermine the app store.
As it stands this thing is pretty disappointing.
I was looking forward to a proper tablet PC.
Way better than a laptop or phone he says when for me it's got the worst of both.
It's too big to carry around like an iPhone and doesn't have nearly the functionality of a laptop, at least not without being nickel and dimed for that functionality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922126</id>
	<title>Too many SKUs</title>
	<author>Singularity42</author>
	<datestamp>1264623720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>16, 32, 64 GB?  There's at most $50 in actual cost difference between 64 and 16.  Apple keeps doing this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>16 , 32 , 64 GB ?
There 's at most $ 50 in actual cost difference between 64 and 16 .
Apple keeps doing this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>16, 32, 64 GB?
There's at most $50 in actual cost difference between 64 and 16.
Apple keeps doing this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924080</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264585260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to mention the fact that it is a steaming pile of insecurity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention the fact that it is a steaming pile of insecurity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention the fact that it is a steaming pile of insecurity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926228</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Sami00Sami</author>
	<datestamp>1264591680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Silly you, there is no god.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Silly you , there is no god .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Silly you, there is no god.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924172</id>
	<title>huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264585560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm an Apple fanboi through and through. I will be buried in either an iCasket or an iUrn, depending on whether I get cremated or not (note: $250 extra for a black iUrn).</p><p>But<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... huh? I totally don't get it. I want to get it, I want to like it, but, somehow, it just don't make sense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm an Apple fanboi through and through .
I will be buried in either an iCasket or an iUrn , depending on whether I get cremated or not ( note : $ 250 extra for a black iUrn ) .But ... huh ? I totally do n't get it .
I want to get it , I want to like it , but , somehow , it just do n't make sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm an Apple fanboi through and through.
I will be buried in either an iCasket or an iUrn, depending on whether I get cremated or not (note: $250 extra for a black iUrn).But ... huh? I totally don't get it.
I want to get it, I want to like it, but, somehow, it just don't make sense.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929596</id>
	<title>Re:So far some interesting points</title>
	<author>babyrat</author>
	<datestamp>1264613460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>There's nothing valuable written for touchpads right now - no decent OS support, no decent touch oriented apps, nothing</i></p><p>Have you tried the touch support in Windows 7?  It integrate the touch stuff with the rest of the operating system, allowing touch access and gestures to apps that aren't written specifically.</p><p>I'll admit there could be more touch specific apps - I suspect that the slew of new tablets introduced at CES might spur some new development.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's nothing valuable written for touchpads right now - no decent OS support , no decent touch oriented apps , nothingHave you tried the touch support in Windows 7 ?
It integrate the touch stuff with the rest of the operating system , allowing touch access and gestures to apps that are n't written specifically.I 'll admit there could be more touch specific apps - I suspect that the slew of new tablets introduced at CES might spur some new development .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's nothing valuable written for touchpads right now - no decent OS support, no decent touch oriented apps, nothingHave you tried the touch support in Windows 7?
It integrate the touch stuff with the rest of the operating system, allowing touch access and gestures to apps that aren't written specifically.I'll admit there could be more touch specific apps - I suspect that the slew of new tablets introduced at CES might spur some new development.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921930</id>
	<title>Re:No WCMDA/HSPA or even CDMA/EVDO is a huge miss</title>
	<author>Mindjiver</author>
	<datestamp>1264623300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How can you claim to be making a mobile device if it does not have mobile broadband? This thing yearning for a mobile internet connection so bad. The only reason that I can think of is that Steve is waiting to deploy this on Verizon's coming LTE network.</p></div><p>Now it came!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>It will be using AT&amp;T's WCDMA/HSPA network. Good stuff!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can you claim to be making a mobile device if it does not have mobile broadband ?
This thing yearning for a mobile internet connection so bad .
The only reason that I can think of is that Steve is waiting to deploy this on Verizon 's coming LTE network.Now it came !
: ) It will be using AT&amp;T 's WCDMA/HSPA network .
Good stuff !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can you claim to be making a mobile device if it does not have mobile broadband?
This thing yearning for a mobile internet connection so bad.
The only reason that I can think of is that Steve is waiting to deploy this on Verizon's coming LTE network.Now it came!
:)It will be using AT&amp;T's WCDMA/HSPA network.
Good stuff!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922074</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264623600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>$499+</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 499 +</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$499+</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921410</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1264622280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really preffered Slate or iSlate over iPad.</p><p>Apple is not perfect. They whiff just like everyone else from time to time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really preffered Slate or iSlate over iPad.Apple is not perfect .
They whiff just like everyone else from time to time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really preffered Slate or iSlate over iPad.Apple is not perfect.
They whiff just like everyone else from time to time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923490</id>
	<title>Air 2.0</title>
	<author>Slash.Poop</author>
	<datestamp>1264583700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't see the market, but that is just me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see the market , but that is just me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see the market, but that is just me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925802</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264590360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The iPhone 3.2 SDK docs definitely indicate it does not multitask.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The iPhone 3.2 SDK docs definitely indicate it does not multitask .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iPhone 3.2 SDK docs definitely indicate it does not multitask.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923324</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264583340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm afraid the answer is a gritty, in-your-face NO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm afraid the answer is a gritty , in-your-face NO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm afraid the answer is a gritty, in-your-face NO.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925188</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264588560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want *pdf's* to go away. What's the point of a format built for 8-1/2 x 11 anyway? 'Specially when ink costs more than a printer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want * pdf 's * to go away .
What 's the point of a format built for 8-1/2 x 11 anyway ?
'Specially when ink costs more than a printer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want *pdf's* to go away.
What's the point of a format built for 8-1/2 x 11 anyway?
'Specially when ink costs more than a printer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922918</id>
	<title>Re:Like him or loath him</title>
	<author>zegota</author>
	<datestamp>1264625520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yep, just like the MacBook Air and Apple TV!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , just like the MacBook Air and Apple TV !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, just like the MacBook Air and Apple TV!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921870</id>
	<title>Apple iPad... on MadTV</title>
	<author>Brazilian Geek</author>
	<datestamp>1264623240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just this...</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1BUH9eXy18" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1BUH9eXy18</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just this...http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = A1BUH9eXy18 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just this...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1BUH9eXy18 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921964</id>
	<title>"Highly recyclable" battery</title>
	<author>ickleberry</author>
	<datestamp>1264623420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What exactly do they mean by this? can they recycle (nearly) all the material used to make the battery to make a new battery? how many cycles does it last? <br> <br>

And more importantly, since it's Apple have they managed to somehow wedge the battery in between the layers of the motherboard's PCB to enforce planned obsolescence? Does it shoot nails in your face if you attempt to open it and replace the battery yourself?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What exactly do they mean by this ?
can they recycle ( nearly ) all the material used to make the battery to make a new battery ?
how many cycles does it last ?
And more importantly , since it 's Apple have they managed to somehow wedge the battery in between the layers of the motherboard 's PCB to enforce planned obsolescence ?
Does it shoot nails in your face if you attempt to open it and replace the battery yourself ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What exactly do they mean by this?
can they recycle (nearly) all the material used to make the battery to make a new battery?
how many cycles does it last?
And more importantly, since it's Apple have they managed to somehow wedge the battery in between the layers of the motherboard's PCB to enforce planned obsolescence?
Does it shoot nails in your face if you attempt to open it and replace the battery yourself?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923000</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't Create a Need</title>
	<author>Wraithlyn</author>
	<datestamp>1264625760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, it is "just" a larger iPhone.</p><p>But multi-touch on a larger screen genuinely opens up new interface possibilities not possible on an iPhone form factor.  Instead of just multiple fingers at once, think multiple hands, even multiple people.  The true value of this will only become apparent in time as new apps are developed to take advantage of the larger screen real estate.</p><p>I seriously don't get all the hate and cynicism already pouring out over this.  What exactly were people expecting?</p><p>Perhaps it is just backlash caused by the hype... but you can't really blame Apple for the hype, they didn't breathe a word about it.  They're in a weird position where everyone creates these crazy expectations for them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , it is " just " a larger iPhone.But multi-touch on a larger screen genuinely opens up new interface possibilities not possible on an iPhone form factor .
Instead of just multiple fingers at once , think multiple hands , even multiple people .
The true value of this will only become apparent in time as new apps are developed to take advantage of the larger screen real estate.I seriously do n't get all the hate and cynicism already pouring out over this .
What exactly were people expecting ? Perhaps it is just backlash caused by the hype... but you ca n't really blame Apple for the hype , they did n't breathe a word about it .
They 're in a weird position where everyone creates these crazy expectations for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, it is "just" a larger iPhone.But multi-touch on a larger screen genuinely opens up new interface possibilities not possible on an iPhone form factor.
Instead of just multiple fingers at once, think multiple hands, even multiple people.
The true value of this will only become apparent in time as new apps are developed to take advantage of the larger screen real estate.I seriously don't get all the hate and cynicism already pouring out over this.
What exactly were people expecting?Perhaps it is just backlash caused by the hype... but you can't really blame Apple for the hype, they didn't breathe a word about it.
They're in a weird position where everyone creates these crazy expectations for them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923216</id>
	<title>Ya? But how absorbant is it?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1264583040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>KeKeKeKeKe!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>KeKeKeKeKe !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KeKeKeKeKe!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923142</id>
	<title>Re:So far some interesting points</title>
	<author>gobbo</author>
	<datestamp>1264582920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Teh Cloud is worse than useless in a power outage or road trip or inside a faraday cage-like-room... give me redundancy, please!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Teh Cloud is worse than useless in a power outage or road trip or inside a faraday cage-like-room... give me redundancy , please !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Teh Cloud is worse than useless in a power outage or road trip or inside a faraday cage-like-room... give me redundancy, please!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924220</id>
	<title>should have used a hybrid e-ink display</title>
	<author>cfriedt</author>
	<datestamp>1264585680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it work without a backlight in direct sunlight too?</p><p>Version 2.0 !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it work without a backlight in direct sunlight too ? Version 2.0 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it work without a backlight in direct sunlight too?Version 2.0 !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927736</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264597980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So it's computer hardware with a dumbed-down OS and no keyboard?  And it has features to make up for the lack of keyboard, which was their own design decision?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So it 's computer hardware with a dumbed-down OS and no keyboard ?
And it has features to make up for the lack of keyboard , which was their own design decision ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it's computer hardware with a dumbed-down OS and no keyboard?
And it has features to make up for the lack of keyboard, which was their own design decision?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921488</id>
	<title>Watching the presentation live...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Watching the announcement live I was struck with just how absorbent the crowd was regarding iPad presentation. It's like this product has wings. I wonder how well the iPad will handle those heavy work flow days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Watching the announcement live I was struck with just how absorbent the crowd was regarding iPad presentation .
It 's like this product has wings .
I wonder how well the iPad will handle those heavy work flow days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watching the announcement live I was struck with just how absorbent the crowd was regarding iPad presentation.
It's like this product has wings.
I wonder how well the iPad will handle those heavy work flow days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921922</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Archangel Michael</author>
	<datestamp>1264623300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's more than just an iPod touch that won't fit in your pocket...it's also an underpowered netbook with no keyboard. <b>LAME</b>!</p></div></blockquote><p>TFIFY</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's more than just an iPod touch that wo n't fit in your pocket...it 's also an underpowered netbook with no keyboard .
LAME ! TFIFY</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's more than just an iPod touch that won't fit in your pocket...it's also an underpowered netbook with no keyboard.
LAME!TFIFY
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922578</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>LordKronos</author>
	<datestamp>1264624740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree that it is an unfortunate name, but I was more thinking for the sake of non-hip parents everywhere, and for the sake of their kids.</p><p>Mom: "Little Jimmy said he wants one of those iPad things for Christmas"<br>Dad: "You mean the iPod"<br>Mom: "Uhh, yeah, I guess that's what he said"<br>Dad: "No problem honey, they're only $100"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree that it is an unfortunate name , but I was more thinking for the sake of non-hip parents everywhere , and for the sake of their kids.Mom : " Little Jimmy said he wants one of those iPad things for Christmas " Dad : " You mean the iPod " Mom : " Uhh , yeah , I guess that 's what he said " Dad : " No problem honey , they 're only $ 100 "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree that it is an unfortunate name, but I was more thinking for the sake of non-hip parents everywhere, and for the sake of their kids.Mom: "Little Jimmy said he wants one of those iPad things for Christmas"Dad: "You mean the iPod"Mom: "Uhh, yeah, I guess that's what he said"Dad: "No problem honey, they're only $100"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924800</id>
	<title>iPad Alternatives</title>
	<author>davide marney</author>
	<datestamp>1264587360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, a lot of the UI features of the iPad don't look <strong>that</strong> revolutionary.  Looks almost like a variant of Moblin to me.   How hard would it be to create a Linux desktop manager that duplicates the functionality of the iPad?  Shoot, it wouldn't even be that hard to go several features better (multi-tasking, daylight-readable screen, video camera, etc.)</p><p>It's great that Apple has put their vision out there, but it looks like when all is said and done, they're betting on their media tie-ins to keep their dominant hipster status.  The special sauce doesn't seem to be in the software or the hardware of the iPad.</p><p>So, while Apple is busy trying to wrangle exclusive deals with Big Content, other smartbook vendors and the FOSS community can be busy analyzing the design choices of the iPad, and dreaming up  an even <strong>better</strong> vision.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , a lot of the UI features of the iPad do n't look that revolutionary .
Looks almost like a variant of Moblin to me .
How hard would it be to create a Linux desktop manager that duplicates the functionality of the iPad ?
Shoot , it would n't even be that hard to go several features better ( multi-tasking , daylight-readable screen , video camera , etc .
) It 's great that Apple has put their vision out there , but it looks like when all is said and done , they 're betting on their media tie-ins to keep their dominant hipster status .
The special sauce does n't seem to be in the software or the hardware of the iPad.So , while Apple is busy trying to wrangle exclusive deals with Big Content , other smartbook vendors and the FOSS community can be busy analyzing the design choices of the iPad , and dreaming up an even better vision .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, a lot of the UI features of the iPad don't look that revolutionary.
Looks almost like a variant of Moblin to me.
How hard would it be to create a Linux desktop manager that duplicates the functionality of the iPad?
Shoot, it wouldn't even be that hard to go several features better (multi-tasking, daylight-readable screen, video camera, etc.
)It's great that Apple has put their vision out there, but it looks like when all is said and done, they're betting on their media tie-ins to keep their dominant hipster status.
The special sauce doesn't seem to be in the software or the hardware of the iPad.So, while Apple is busy trying to wrangle exclusive deals with Big Content, other smartbook vendors and the FOSS community can be busy analyzing the design choices of the iPad, and dreaming up  an even better vision.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922230</id>
	<title>At a min 2x price of Kindle</title>
	<author>yumyum</author>
	<datestamp>1264623900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not sure about this or the market for it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure about this or the market for it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure about this or the market for it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923100</id>
	<title>Re:Too many SKUs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264582800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, 16Gb SDHC cards have been around $30 for 6+ months, so I'd say more like $90 in retail terms. It's the jump from 16 to 32 that's way too high.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , 16Gb SDHC cards have been around $ 30 for 6 + months , so I 'd say more like $ 90 in retail terms .
It 's the jump from 16 to 32 that 's way too high .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, 16Gb SDHC cards have been around $30 for 6+ months, so I'd say more like $90 in retail terms.
It's the jump from 16 to 32 that's way too high.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924992</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264587960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My shitty attempt at Photoshopping:</p><p><a href="http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2wd7y8k&amp;s=6" title="tinypic.com" rel="nofollow">http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2wd7y8k&amp;s=6</a> [tinypic.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My shitty attempt at Photoshopping : http : //tinypic.com/view.php ? pic = 2wd7y8k&amp;s = 6 [ tinypic.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My shitty attempt at Photoshopping:http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2wd7y8k&amp;s=6 [tinypic.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927990</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264599540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bullshit. The grandparent was following the money. You're not. You lose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bullshit .
The grandparent was following the money .
You 're not .
You lose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bullshit.
The grandparent was following the money.
You're not.
You lose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921736</id>
	<title>This fits squarely in the category of "meh"</title>
	<author>SwabTheDeck</author>
	<datestamp>1264622940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have both an iPhone and a MacBook and I use and love both everyday.  However, I've never thought to myself, "how great would it be to have a 10-inch iPhone?"  After watching the live coverage for the last hour, that's basically all this is.  The OS and UI are basically the same, just upscaled and optimized in some places for the larger screen.  As far as I can tell, there are none of the clever innovations that are typically present in a new Apple product.  The only people that I can see this thing appealing to would be people that have a strong fascination for touch screens and people that don't feel that they can properly lounge about with a laptop (as exemplified by Steve Jobs lounging in a love seat during the presentation).  I think the only obvious application would be as an ebook reader (side note: I nearly had a fit when they decided to reuse the term iBook to brand their ebooks).  The presentation still isn't done so there isn't a word on price, but if it can't come within range of the Kindle and similar devices, I'd say this thing is purely novelty.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have both an iPhone and a MacBook and I use and love both everyday .
However , I 've never thought to myself , " how great would it be to have a 10-inch iPhone ?
" After watching the live coverage for the last hour , that 's basically all this is .
The OS and UI are basically the same , just upscaled and optimized in some places for the larger screen .
As far as I can tell , there are none of the clever innovations that are typically present in a new Apple product .
The only people that I can see this thing appealing to would be people that have a strong fascination for touch screens and people that do n't feel that they can properly lounge about with a laptop ( as exemplified by Steve Jobs lounging in a love seat during the presentation ) .
I think the only obvious application would be as an ebook reader ( side note : I nearly had a fit when they decided to reuse the term iBook to brand their ebooks ) .
The presentation still is n't done so there is n't a word on price , but if it ca n't come within range of the Kindle and similar devices , I 'd say this thing is purely novelty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have both an iPhone and a MacBook and I use and love both everyday.
However, I've never thought to myself, "how great would it be to have a 10-inch iPhone?
"  After watching the live coverage for the last hour, that's basically all this is.
The OS and UI are basically the same, just upscaled and optimized in some places for the larger screen.
As far as I can tell, there are none of the clever innovations that are typically present in a new Apple product.
The only people that I can see this thing appealing to would be people that have a strong fascination for touch screens and people that don't feel that they can properly lounge about with a laptop (as exemplified by Steve Jobs lounging in a love seat during the presentation).
I think the only obvious application would be as an ebook reader (side note: I nearly had a fit when they decided to reuse the term iBook to brand their ebooks).
The presentation still isn't done so there isn't a word on price, but if it can't come within range of the Kindle and similar devices, I'd say this thing is purely novelty.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931616</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1264681380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hehe, I just read the quote from Apple from that article:</p><p>"...Right now, from our point of view, the products in there are principally based on hardware that's much less powerful than we think customers want, software technology that is not good, cramped keyboards, small displays. Et cetera. We don't think that people are going to be pleased with those type of products. But we'll see."</p><p>It's quite an ironic quote in the context of the iPad- the iPad is even less powerful than most netbooks, has a more limited OS than most netbooks, has an even more cramped keyboard that is also on-screen, and has an equally sized display.</p><p>So basically, what Apple are saying with the iPad is "We've taken all the negative traits we thought about netbooks, made them worse, added more, and doubled the price".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hehe , I just read the quote from Apple from that article : " ...Right now , from our point of view , the products in there are principally based on hardware that 's much less powerful than we think customers want , software technology that is not good , cramped keyboards , small displays .
Et cetera .
We do n't think that people are going to be pleased with those type of products .
But we 'll see .
" It 's quite an ironic quote in the context of the iPad- the iPad is even less powerful than most netbooks , has a more limited OS than most netbooks , has an even more cramped keyboard that is also on-screen , and has an equally sized display.So basically , what Apple are saying with the iPad is " We 've taken all the negative traits we thought about netbooks , made them worse , added more , and doubled the price " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hehe, I just read the quote from Apple from that article:"...Right now, from our point of view, the products in there are principally based on hardware that's much less powerful than we think customers want, software technology that is not good, cramped keyboards, small displays.
Et cetera.
We don't think that people are going to be pleased with those type of products.
But we'll see.
"It's quite an ironic quote in the context of the iPad- the iPad is even less powerful than most netbooks, has a more limited OS than most netbooks, has an even more cramped keyboard that is also on-screen, and has an equally sized display.So basically, what Apple are saying with the iPad is "We've taken all the negative traits we thought about netbooks, made them worse, added more, and doubled the price".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364</id>
	<title>No 3g?</title>
	<author>Blimey85</author>
	<datestamp>1264622160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>With no 3G I suddenly don't want one. I love my iPhone and thought this would be great for watching videos and surfing on the couch, but I also want to take it places where I don't have wifi and in the modern age, most things you do require the internet. Seems silly to not include that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With no 3G I suddenly do n't want one .
I love my iPhone and thought this would be great for watching videos and surfing on the couch , but I also want to take it places where I do n't have wifi and in the modern age , most things you do require the internet .
Seems silly to not include that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With no 3G I suddenly don't want one.
I love my iPhone and thought this would be great for watching videos and surfing on the couch, but I also want to take it places where I don't have wifi and in the modern age, most things you do require the internet.
Seems silly to not include that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924468</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Sandbags</author>
	<datestamp>1264586400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, since it has no native GPS chip (i think a bad move, but hey, there will be another model in 8 months...), then what are you missing?  media streaming?  Apple has already admitted an iPod/iTunes app plug-in model is in the works for iPhone OS 4, so Pandora streaming while editing docs should be a non issue...  Outside of that, c'mon really.  It;s 64GB for $830 at 10", or for $899 you get a 13" macbook...  WEhat would you choose if you were a power user of a device (lets face it, a power user looking for multitasking is going to want 3G and 64GB and not be happy with the 16GB $499 base model).</p><p>Honestly, Apple is dead on in the market segment, and they're right, multitasking is irrelevent.  So long as i can use it while it's syncing, and i get an iPod plug-in system, Safari already background downloads, iPod already backgrounds, notifications work, e-mail is allways on, it's not a phone...  multitasking is not required.  there is no use case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , since it has no native GPS chip ( i think a bad move , but hey , there will be another model in 8 months... ) , then what are you missing ?
media streaming ?
Apple has already admitted an iPod/iTunes app plug-in model is in the works for iPhone OS 4 , so Pandora streaming while editing docs should be a non issue... Outside of that , c'mon really .
It ; s 64GB for $ 830 at 10 " , or for $ 899 you get a 13 " macbook... WEhat would you choose if you were a power user of a device ( lets face it , a power user looking for multitasking is going to want 3G and 64GB and not be happy with the 16GB $ 499 base model ) .Honestly , Apple is dead on in the market segment , and they 're right , multitasking is irrelevent .
So long as i can use it while it 's syncing , and i get an iPod plug-in system , Safari already background downloads , iPod already backgrounds , notifications work , e-mail is allways on , it 's not a phone... multitasking is not required .
there is no use case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, since it has no native GPS chip (i think a bad move, but hey, there will be another model in 8 months...), then what are you missing?
media streaming?
Apple has already admitted an iPod/iTunes app plug-in model is in the works for iPhone OS 4, so Pandora streaming while editing docs should be a non issue...  Outside of that, c'mon really.
It;s 64GB for $830 at 10", or for $899 you get a 13" macbook...  WEhat would you choose if you were a power user of a device (lets face it, a power user looking for multitasking is going to want 3G and 64GB and not be happy with the 16GB $499 base model).Honestly, Apple is dead on in the market segment, and they're right, multitasking is irrelevent.
So long as i can use it while it's syncing, and i get an iPod plug-in system, Safari already background downloads, iPod already backgrounds, notifications work, e-mail is allways on, it's not a phone...  multitasking is not required.
there is no use case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926580</id>
	<title>Re:Watching the presentation live...</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1264592760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's like this product has wings.</p></div><p>That's coming in the next version. I hear they're great for preventing leaks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like this product has wings.That 's coming in the next version .
I hear they 're great for preventing leaks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like this product has wings.That's coming in the next version.
I hear they're great for preventing leaks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921742</id>
	<title>underpowered?</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1264622940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It actually has a robust power source; it is powered almost entirely by the user's sense of self-importance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It actually has a robust power source ; it is powered almost entirely by the user 's sense of self-importance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It actually has a robust power source; it is powered almost entirely by the user's sense of self-importance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928202</id>
	<title>Re:Phenomenal</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1264600680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Well, considdering both the low res of netbooks, and the portrait-only widescreen display mode, and considdering no other mobile device can do that, honestly he's right, this is the first mobile device other than an full scale notebook platform that can display an entire web site on a screen.</p></div><p>What "low res" of netbooks? Mine does 1366x768, which is more than this thing. Most do 1024x600, which isn't all that much different from iPad.</p><p>Then again, 768x1024 is not good enough (i.e. not wide enough) for quite a few websites out there, so even disregarding any comparison, it's still one lousy point for Steve to make. Of course you can find a website that "fits", but then you can find one that'd fit on, say, a N900 (800x480) just as well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , considdering both the low res of netbooks , and the portrait-only widescreen display mode , and considdering no other mobile device can do that , honestly he 's right , this is the first mobile device other than an full scale notebook platform that can display an entire web site on a screen.What " low res " of netbooks ?
Mine does 1366x768 , which is more than this thing .
Most do 1024x600 , which is n't all that much different from iPad.Then again , 768x1024 is not good enough ( i.e .
not wide enough ) for quite a few websites out there , so even disregarding any comparison , it 's still one lousy point for Steve to make .
Of course you can find a website that " fits " , but then you can find one that 'd fit on , say , a N900 ( 800x480 ) just as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, considdering both the low res of netbooks, and the portrait-only widescreen display mode, and considdering no other mobile device can do that, honestly he's right, this is the first mobile device other than an full scale notebook platform that can display an entire web site on a screen.What "low res" of netbooks?
Mine does 1366x768, which is more than this thing.
Most do 1024x600, which isn't all that much different from iPad.Then again, 768x1024 is not good enough (i.e.
not wide enough) for quite a few websites out there, so even disregarding any comparison, it's still one lousy point for Steve to make.
Of course you can find a website that "fits", but then you can find one that'd fit on, say, a N900 (800x480) just as well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923718</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264584300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope, no multitasking from what I've read on several sites.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope , no multitasking from what I 've read on several sites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope, no multitasking from what I've read on several sites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922478</id>
	<title>Re:Is that the real actual name?</title>
	<author>mrdoogee</author>
	<datestamp>1264624500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like a Kennedy talking about their iPod.</p><p>"Er ah, I, eh want an iPad! I want to watch, er ah, Dora the Explora!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a Kennedy talking about their iPod .
" Er ah , I , eh want an iPad !
I want to watch , er ah , Dora the Explora !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a Kennedy talking about their iPod.
"Er ah, I, eh want an iPad!
I want to watch, er ah, Dora the Explora!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30932530</id>
	<title>Re:Taking Jobs at his word</title>
	<author>MistrBlank</author>
	<datestamp>1264690380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The context of that statement was the list of capabilities that it needs to be good at.</p><p>The iPad will not replace a laptop which has fully feature command line environment, fully flexible software environment, productivity, etc.  And it will not replace a device designed to fit in your pocket, plays music well (interestingly plays video only moderately well) and receives phone calls.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The context of that statement was the list of capabilities that it needs to be good at.The iPad will not replace a laptop which has fully feature command line environment , fully flexible software environment , productivity , etc .
And it will not replace a device designed to fit in your pocket , plays music well ( interestingly plays video only moderately well ) and receives phone calls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The context of that statement was the list of capabilities that it needs to be good at.The iPad will not replace a laptop which has fully feature command line environment, fully flexible software environment, productivity, etc.
And it will not replace a device designed to fit in your pocket, plays music well (interestingly plays video only moderately well) and receives phone calls.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30993484</id>
	<title>Apple iPad Backed As Business Tool By Forrester</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265115060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/mwc--apple-ipad-backed-as-business-tool-by-forrester-3221</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/mwc--apple-ipad-backed-as-business-tool-by-forrester-3221</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/mwc--apple-ipad-backed-as-business-tool-by-forrester-3221</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924450</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264586280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and just think of all the people in the boston area unable to differentiate the pronunciation of the the ipad and the ipod.</p><p>this could lead to poor communication when attempting to purchase the product, resulting in violence and possibly a Martin Scorsese film.</p><p>very bad move by apple indeed<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and just think of all the people in the boston area unable to differentiate the pronunciation of the the ipad and the ipod.this could lead to poor communication when attempting to purchase the product , resulting in violence and possibly a Martin Scorsese film.very bad move by apple indeed : /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and just think of all the people in the boston area unable to differentiate the pronunciation of the the ipad and the ipod.this could lead to poor communication when attempting to purchase the product, resulting in violence and possibly a Martin Scorsese film.very bad move by apple indeed :/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923960</id>
	<title>Re:underpowered?</title>
	<author>lastchance\_000</author>
	<datestamp>1264584900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I laughed so hard, my beret fell off!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I laughed so hard , my beret fell off !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I laughed so hard, my beret fell off!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926764</id>
	<title>Re:Typical techies and gadget freaks</title>
	<author>Macka</author>
	<datestamp>1264593360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well said.  I showed my Wife the Apple introductory video of this and she was drooling my the end of it.  She's made it pretty clear that if I choose to get one I'd better get one for her too or there will be trouble LOL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well said .
I showed my Wife the Apple introductory video of this and she was drooling my the end of it .
She 's made it pretty clear that if I choose to get one I 'd better get one for her too or there will be trouble LOL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well said.
I showed my Wife the Apple introductory video of this and she was drooling my the end of it.
She's made it pretty clear that if I choose to get one I'd better get one for her too or there will be trouble LOL.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926696</id>
	<title>Re:Typical techies and gadget freaks</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1264593180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It may also be possible that it's a lot easier to communicate and discuss hardware specs than a software platform and interface.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It may also be possible that it 's a lot easier to communicate and discuss hardware specs than a software platform and interface .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may also be possible that it's a lot easier to communicate and discuss hardware specs than a software platform and interface.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924024</id>
	<title>Re:No stylus eh?</title>
	<author>cowscows</author>
	<datestamp>1264585080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I doubt it'll be long before you can buy any number of stylus accessories for it. Sure, they probably won't have all sorts of neato buttons and such built in, but it'll at least allow you to draw in a more familiar way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt it 'll be long before you can buy any number of stylus accessories for it .
Sure , they probably wo n't have all sorts of neato buttons and such built in , but it 'll at least allow you to draw in a more familiar way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt it'll be long before you can buy any number of stylus accessories for it.
Sure, they probably won't have all sorts of neato buttons and such built in, but it'll at least allow you to draw in a more familiar way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921830</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264623180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An underpowered Netbook that doesn't run Flash player.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An underpowered Netbook that does n't run Flash player .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An underpowered Netbook that doesn't run Flash player.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921728</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1264622940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I haven't read the slideshow in detail, but the thing does support Bluetooth.  I wonder if it could work with a Bluetooth keyboard, and maybe mouse.</p><p>Mousing is going to be a toughie with an OS designed for multitouch, but if you are using it for document editing and/or other stuff you'd at a desktop where an efficient input mechanism trumps any desire for multitouch, it could still be OK for specific tasks.</p><p>I dunno.  I really like my wife's iPod Touch, and she's hankering for a netbook/larger screen version, but neither of us would have been willing to shell out the kind of bucks that Apple wanted for the iTouch (I won it in a writing contest).  I can't imagine the price they are going to get for an A4-sized iTouch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't read the slideshow in detail , but the thing does support Bluetooth .
I wonder if it could work with a Bluetooth keyboard , and maybe mouse.Mousing is going to be a toughie with an OS designed for multitouch , but if you are using it for document editing and/or other stuff you 'd at a desktop where an efficient input mechanism trumps any desire for multitouch , it could still be OK for specific tasks.I dunno .
I really like my wife 's iPod Touch , and she 's hankering for a netbook/larger screen version , but neither of us would have been willing to shell out the kind of bucks that Apple wanted for the iTouch ( I won it in a writing contest ) .
I ca n't imagine the price they are going to get for an A4-sized iTouch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't read the slideshow in detail, but the thing does support Bluetooth.
I wonder if it could work with a Bluetooth keyboard, and maybe mouse.Mousing is going to be a toughie with an OS designed for multitouch, but if you are using it for document editing and/or other stuff you'd at a desktop where an efficient input mechanism trumps any desire for multitouch, it could still be OK for specific tasks.I dunno.
I really like my wife's iPod Touch, and she's hankering for a netbook/larger screen version, but neither of us would have been willing to shell out the kind of bucks that Apple wanted for the iTouch (I won it in a writing contest).
I can't imagine the price they are going to get for an A4-sized iTouch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922998</id>
	<title>All I'm wating for....</title>
	<author>s0litaire</author>
	<datestamp>1264625760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>...is to see iFixit's teardown if the iPad...</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>...is to see iFixit 's teardown if the iPad.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is to see iFixit's teardown if the iPad...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921750</id>
	<title>Deja vu?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have to use a tethered iPhone for 3G access?  Why does this<br>sound <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palm\_Foleo" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">familiar</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have to use a tethered iPhone for 3G access ?
Why does thissound familiar [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have to use a tethered iPhone for 3G access?
Why does thissound familiar [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922040</id>
	<title>Oblig.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264623540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that an IPad in your panties, or are you just happy to bleed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that an IPad in your panties , or are you just happy to bleed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that an IPad in your panties, or are you just happy to bleed?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922502</id>
	<title>Re:Pricing announced</title>
	<author>EricWright</author>
	<datestamp>1264624560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ummm, <a href="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/apple-creation-0369-rm-eng.jpg" title="blogcdn.com">no</a> [blogcdn.com].  Mb is accurate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ummm , no [ blogcdn.com ] .
Mb is accurate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ummm, no [blogcdn.com].
Mb is accurate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929192</id>
	<title>Re:The iPad is a Platform</title>
	<author>CODiNE</author>
	<datestamp>1264609140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ya know with all the emulated games showing up on the iPhone lately it seems to me that SCUMMVM is missing their chance.</p><p>Make the app free and sell inside the app (after making agreements with the owners)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Broken Sword may be possible, Beyond A Steel Sky, etc... several companies have freewared their games or would be glad to make such an agreement with the SCUMMVM guys.  It doesn't seem like they're forced to be for just jailbroken phones anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ya know with all the emulated games showing up on the iPhone lately it seems to me that SCUMMVM is missing their chance.Make the app free and sell inside the app ( after making agreements with the owners ) ... Broken Sword may be possible , Beyond A Steel Sky , etc... several companies have freewared their games or would be glad to make such an agreement with the SCUMMVM guys .
It does n't seem like they 're forced to be for just jailbroken phones anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ya know with all the emulated games showing up on the iPhone lately it seems to me that SCUMMVM is missing their chance.Make the app free and sell inside the app (after making agreements with the owners) ... Broken Sword may be possible, Beyond A Steel Sky, etc... several companies have freewared their games or would be glad to make such an agreement with the SCUMMVM guys.
It doesn't seem like they're forced to be for just jailbroken phones anymore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925576</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1264589760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is that the first thing you think of? This is a geek site, you're supposed to be thinking that one more "d" and they'd have to pay royalties to the Paramount.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is that the first thing you think of ?
This is a geek site , you 're supposed to be thinking that one more " d " and they 'd have to pay royalties to the Paramount .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is that the first thing you think of?
This is a geek site, you're supposed to be thinking that one more "d" and they'd have to pay royalties to the Paramount.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927874</id>
	<title>Re:Disappointed.</title>
	<author>aralin</author>
	<datestamp>1264598820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean, can you imagine holding this giant thing up to take photos? It is ridiculous and exactly the thing Apple would not do with its products. But I think there should have been front facing camera for video chat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , can you imagine holding this giant thing up to take photos ?
It is ridiculous and exactly the thing Apple would not do with its products .
But I think there should have been front facing camera for video chat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, can you imagine holding this giant thing up to take photos?
It is ridiculous and exactly the thing Apple would not do with its products.
But I think there should have been front facing camera for video chat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923640</id>
	<title>Pros vs Cons</title>
	<author>docbrody</author>
	<datestamp>1264584120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cons:<br>
- No Flash<br>
- No WebCam<br>
- No Microphone<br>
- No Multi-Tasking<br>
- No HD Video (1024x768)<br>
- No Front facing speakers
<br>
Pros:<br>
- Great for watching Porn<br>
- Will greatly enhance the experience of taking a dump<br>
- Bright Screen, good viewing angle<br>
- 140k apps already<br>
- Seems very very fast and responsive<br>
- Thin and light<br>
- Unlike Kindle, no night light required<br>
- Price (of base model)<br>
- Battery life</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cons : - No Flash - No WebCam - No Microphone - No Multi-Tasking - No HD Video ( 1024x768 ) - No Front facing speakers Pros : - Great for watching Porn - Will greatly enhance the experience of taking a dump - Bright Screen , good viewing angle - 140k apps already - Seems very very fast and responsive - Thin and light - Unlike Kindle , no night light required - Price ( of base model ) - Battery life</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cons:
- No Flash
- No WebCam
- No Microphone
- No Multi-Tasking
- No HD Video (1024x768)
- No Front facing speakers

Pros:
- Great for watching Porn
- Will greatly enhance the experience of taking a dump
- Bright Screen, good viewing angle
- 140k apps already
- Seems very very fast and responsive
- Thin and light
- Unlike Kindle, no night light required
- Price (of base model)
- Battery life</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922494</id>
	<title>apple doubles prices again</title>
	<author>farble1670</author>
	<datestamp>1264624560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>an apple laptop is about 2x the price* of a PC laptop for about the same hardware. and continuing with that trend, they have now released a netbook that is about 2x the price of a PC netbook.</p><p>* a strict price comparison is not possible. apple tends to have better form factors. in laptops (at 2x the price), they have a slightly better processor, and usually a smaller hard drive. the iPad (at 2x the price) obviously has a better form factor and a touch screen, but a netbook has a more powerful processor and bigger disk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>an apple laptop is about 2x the price * of a PC laptop for about the same hardware .
and continuing with that trend , they have now released a netbook that is about 2x the price of a PC netbook .
* a strict price comparison is not possible .
apple tends to have better form factors .
in laptops ( at 2x the price ) , they have a slightly better processor , and usually a smaller hard drive .
the iPad ( at 2x the price ) obviously has a better form factor and a touch screen , but a netbook has a more powerful processor and bigger disk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>an apple laptop is about 2x the price* of a PC laptop for about the same hardware.
and continuing with that trend, they have now released a netbook that is about 2x the price of a PC netbook.
* a strict price comparison is not possible.
apple tends to have better form factors.
in laptops (at 2x the price), they have a slightly better processor, and usually a smaller hard drive.
the iPad (at 2x the price) obviously has a better form factor and a touch screen, but a netbook has a more powerful processor and bigger disk.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921512</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple Canvas also seemed like a nice name</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple Canvas also seemed like a nice name</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple Canvas also seemed like a nice name</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925418</id>
	<title>Re:Phenomenal</title>
	<author>jo\_ham</author>
	<datestamp>1264589280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How do the words rotate around if you hold the book sideways, or would you ordinarily read sideways.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do the words rotate around if you hold the book sideways , or would you ordinarily read sideways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do the words rotate around if you hold the book sideways, or would you ordinarily read sideways.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923904</id>
	<title>Re:is late</title>
	<author>grepya</author>
	<datestamp>1264584720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Speaking of feminine reproductive system, "is late" would sound much worse than iPad... no ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Speaking of feminine reproductive system , " is late " would sound much worse than iPad... no ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Speaking of feminine reproductive system, "is late" would sound much worse than iPad... no ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924410</id>
	<title>Re:No stylus eh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264586220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really hope you're being sarcastic.  If not, here's a hint - I just used a butter knife to navigate my ipod touch.  Maybe not the most ergonomic "stylus" but functional.  More importantly, it means that it is painfully simple to make your own stylus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really hope you 're being sarcastic .
If not , here 's a hint - I just used a butter knife to navigate my ipod touch .
Maybe not the most ergonomic " stylus " but functional .
More importantly , it means that it is painfully simple to make your own stylus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really hope you're being sarcastic.
If not, here's a hint - I just used a butter knife to navigate my ipod touch.
Maybe not the most ergonomic "stylus" but functional.
More importantly, it means that it is painfully simple to make your own stylus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925244</id>
	<title>What a disappointment...:(</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264588800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's just a big Iphone. Come on steve you really dropped the ball on this one.. Oh and whats with the name it sounds like a feminine hygiene product. iSlate or Itablet would have been much better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's just a big Iphone .
Come on steve you really dropped the ball on this one.. Oh and whats with the name it sounds like a feminine hygiene product .
iSlate or Itablet would have been much better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's just a big Iphone.
Come on steve you really dropped the ball on this one.. Oh and whats with the name it sounds like a feminine hygiene product.
iSlate or Itablet would have been much better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925724</id>
	<title>Re:$500!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264590120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wow... nothing really excited me all that much until this price point. Now, THAT'S low! Very unexpected. I was thinking $600 at bear minimum.</p></div><p>$500 + the connectors (they have SPECIAL connectors for TV/Monitor,USB and MEMORY CARD READER) = 600+</p><p>Come on... not even a mini-display port? One SD-memory reader? or just a stupid USB!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow... nothing really excited me all that much until this price point .
Now , THAT 'S low !
Very unexpected .
I was thinking $ 600 at bear minimum. $ 500 + the connectors ( they have SPECIAL connectors for TV/Monitor,USB and MEMORY CARD READER ) = 600 + Come on... not even a mini-display port ?
One SD-memory reader ?
or just a stupid USB !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow... nothing really excited me all that much until this price point.
Now, THAT'S low!
Very unexpected.
I was thinking $600 at bear minimum.$500 + the connectors (they have SPECIAL connectors for TV/Monitor,USB and MEMORY CARD READER) = 600+Come on... not even a mini-display port?
One SD-memory reader?
or just a stupid USB!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928292</id>
	<title>Why would I buy an iPad</title>
	<author>samwhite\_y</author>
	<datestamp>1264601340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a theme to some of the comments which I wish to rebut. Essentially the theme is that Apple products really are not that good and they sell well only because Apple does such good marketing. The implied assumption here is that if you buy Apple's products, such as the iPod, you are just a sucker fooled by Apple's marketing campaign. Since I have bought Apple products because I thought they were the best products available for my needs, I see these statements as declaring that I am also a sucker and lacking in any real tech smarts. Essentially I feel like I am being called an idiot.</p><p>I remember when this debate was between Linux and PCs, and the Linux crowd was trying to argue that nobody should need to run Microsoft software to do their jobs or get things done. This was at time when you could not get Linux to legally read a DVD or use algorithms to do reasonable font rendering. Of course, these limitations were because of licensing issues, some of the most useful software productivity features were protected by commercial licenses or patents. The Linux advocates would argue that I should not be running such software in the first place because it was not "open" software. But that is a different argument. I have far more sympathy for the argument that running Linux is a superior moral choice. But arguing that Linux was a better OS for getting my job done was nonsense.</p><p>I am going to come at my argument in a backwards way. Instead of touting features of the iPad, I am going to describe artfully chosen limitations. The biggest limitation is that a developer cannot develop an application that can run as a persistent multi-threaded process. Any application that is not being used at any current moment is torn down and a new one instantiated. This is even more limited than the old Windows 3.x OS with its event driven model for task switching (for those you who don't remember -- Windows 3.x had only one running thread and all applications shared memory). Another limitation is that applications cannot use a shared file system or use shared libraries. You cannot build an application out of other applications or write applications whose purpose is to interact with other applications in useful ways. A user cannot even freely write code for their own application, build it, and run it.</p><p>For anybody who likes to tinker with their computers (I consider myself somewhat in that breed, I do programming for a living), this seems almost mind boggling stupid. But there is a method to this madness.</p><p>So what do you get back for these choices.</p><p>1. A very stable device that does not need to worry about applications doing semi-permanent bad things to your computer requiring a reboot. It is not stable just because applications have a hard time doing bad things, but the basic logic of behavior is so simple that you can "audit"  and control it in a way that you cannot control a standard modern OS. This eliminates tangled logic scenarios that come up when you have interactions between device drivers, OS interrupts, glitches in hardware, and complicated applications. Also, it is far easier to write protections against hostile software, especially if you control the distribution of all software for your device.</p><p>I think many in the Slashdot crowd underestimate the importance of stability in a portable device. I reboot computers all the time because of glitches of various sorts. It is true that the OS is rarely to blame, it might be the device driver for my mouse, or a disk glitch, a misbehaving network router, or a bad application but generally such issues are fatal. And because of the complexity of the OS, the OS really has no chance at diagnosing the true cause of the problem.</p><p>That is not something I will tolerate in a lightweight portable device used for limited but useful activities. I have heard rumors that Android phones, once you start trying to run some of the same application that make the iPhone popular, have far more problems with various issues, such as unwanted battery run down for processes that</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a theme to some of the comments which I wish to rebut .
Essentially the theme is that Apple products really are not that good and they sell well only because Apple does such good marketing .
The implied assumption here is that if you buy Apple 's products , such as the iPod , you are just a sucker fooled by Apple 's marketing campaign .
Since I have bought Apple products because I thought they were the best products available for my needs , I see these statements as declaring that I am also a sucker and lacking in any real tech smarts .
Essentially I feel like I am being called an idiot.I remember when this debate was between Linux and PCs , and the Linux crowd was trying to argue that nobody should need to run Microsoft software to do their jobs or get things done .
This was at time when you could not get Linux to legally read a DVD or use algorithms to do reasonable font rendering .
Of course , these limitations were because of licensing issues , some of the most useful software productivity features were protected by commercial licenses or patents .
The Linux advocates would argue that I should not be running such software in the first place because it was not " open " software .
But that is a different argument .
I have far more sympathy for the argument that running Linux is a superior moral choice .
But arguing that Linux was a better OS for getting my job done was nonsense.I am going to come at my argument in a backwards way .
Instead of touting features of the iPad , I am going to describe artfully chosen limitations .
The biggest limitation is that a developer can not develop an application that can run as a persistent multi-threaded process .
Any application that is not being used at any current moment is torn down and a new one instantiated .
This is even more limited than the old Windows 3.x OS with its event driven model for task switching ( for those you who do n't remember -- Windows 3.x had only one running thread and all applications shared memory ) .
Another limitation is that applications can not use a shared file system or use shared libraries .
You can not build an application out of other applications or write applications whose purpose is to interact with other applications in useful ways .
A user can not even freely write code for their own application , build it , and run it.For anybody who likes to tinker with their computers ( I consider myself somewhat in that breed , I do programming for a living ) , this seems almost mind boggling stupid .
But there is a method to this madness.So what do you get back for these choices.1 .
A very stable device that does not need to worry about applications doing semi-permanent bad things to your computer requiring a reboot .
It is not stable just because applications have a hard time doing bad things , but the basic logic of behavior is so simple that you can " audit " and control it in a way that you can not control a standard modern OS .
This eliminates tangled logic scenarios that come up when you have interactions between device drivers , OS interrupts , glitches in hardware , and complicated applications .
Also , it is far easier to write protections against hostile software , especially if you control the distribution of all software for your device.I think many in the Slashdot crowd underestimate the importance of stability in a portable device .
I reboot computers all the time because of glitches of various sorts .
It is true that the OS is rarely to blame , it might be the device driver for my mouse , or a disk glitch , a misbehaving network router , or a bad application but generally such issues are fatal .
And because of the complexity of the OS , the OS really has no chance at diagnosing the true cause of the problem.That is not something I will tolerate in a lightweight portable device used for limited but useful activities .
I have heard rumors that Android phones , once you start trying to run some of the same application that make the iPhone popular , have far more problems with various issues , such as unwanted battery run down for processes that</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a theme to some of the comments which I wish to rebut.
Essentially the theme is that Apple products really are not that good and they sell well only because Apple does such good marketing.
The implied assumption here is that if you buy Apple's products, such as the iPod, you are just a sucker fooled by Apple's marketing campaign.
Since I have bought Apple products because I thought they were the best products available for my needs, I see these statements as declaring that I am also a sucker and lacking in any real tech smarts.
Essentially I feel like I am being called an idiot.I remember when this debate was between Linux and PCs, and the Linux crowd was trying to argue that nobody should need to run Microsoft software to do their jobs or get things done.
This was at time when you could not get Linux to legally read a DVD or use algorithms to do reasonable font rendering.
Of course, these limitations were because of licensing issues, some of the most useful software productivity features were protected by commercial licenses or patents.
The Linux advocates would argue that I should not be running such software in the first place because it was not "open" software.
But that is a different argument.
I have far more sympathy for the argument that running Linux is a superior moral choice.
But arguing that Linux was a better OS for getting my job done was nonsense.I am going to come at my argument in a backwards way.
Instead of touting features of the iPad, I am going to describe artfully chosen limitations.
The biggest limitation is that a developer cannot develop an application that can run as a persistent multi-threaded process.
Any application that is not being used at any current moment is torn down and a new one instantiated.
This is even more limited than the old Windows 3.x OS with its event driven model for task switching (for those you who don't remember -- Windows 3.x had only one running thread and all applications shared memory).
Another limitation is that applications cannot use a shared file system or use shared libraries.
You cannot build an application out of other applications or write applications whose purpose is to interact with other applications in useful ways.
A user cannot even freely write code for their own application, build it, and run it.For anybody who likes to tinker with their computers (I consider myself somewhat in that breed, I do programming for a living), this seems almost mind boggling stupid.
But there is a method to this madness.So what do you get back for these choices.1.
A very stable device that does not need to worry about applications doing semi-permanent bad things to your computer requiring a reboot.
It is not stable just because applications have a hard time doing bad things, but the basic logic of behavior is so simple that you can "audit"  and control it in a way that you cannot control a standard modern OS.
This eliminates tangled logic scenarios that come up when you have interactions between device drivers, OS interrupts, glitches in hardware, and complicated applications.
Also, it is far easier to write protections against hostile software, especially if you control the distribution of all software for your device.I think many in the Slashdot crowd underestimate the importance of stability in a portable device.
I reboot computers all the time because of glitches of various sorts.
It is true that the OS is rarely to blame, it might be the device driver for my mouse, or a disk glitch, a misbehaving network router, or a bad application but generally such issues are fatal.
And because of the complexity of the OS, the OS really has no chance at diagnosing the true cause of the problem.That is not something I will tolerate in a lightweight portable device used for limited but useful activities.
I have heard rumors that Android phones, once you start trying to run some of the same application that make the iPhone popular, have far more problems with various issues, such as unwanted battery run down for processes that</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921602</id>
	<title>New app website</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maximum iPad. No confusion, whatsoever. Guess the URL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maximum iPad .
No confusion , whatsoever .
Guess the URL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maximum iPad.
No confusion, whatsoever.
Guess the URL.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872</id>
	<title>The iPad is a Platform</title>
	<author>Max Romantschuk</author>
	<datestamp>1264625400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most people here don't see past their own noses... Myself, I like the iPad except for the fact that Apple decides what I can install... but that's the whole point.</p><p>The iPad is a platform, not a device.</p><p>Most people just want stuff to work, and don't want to care how. Most of the time, so do I. I don't want my stove in the kitchen to require a friggin manual to do basic cooking even if I could patch it to boil eggs 15\% faster I never would be bothered. It's the same for regular people with all tech, computers included. People don't want to know the details, they just want to tap on a movie/book/app/whatever, confirm their transaction, and have it all just work.</p><p>The iPad can run iPhone apps, and the SDK is available now. App developers will be falling over each other to be first with new apps taking advantage of the larger screen.</p><p>I'm very tempted, but still skeptical I'll buy this myself. The closed platform is an issue for me. But most people couldn't care less about what they can't do on a device like this, if they just can do all they want. Freedom is great, but how many of us have truly bothered to go under the hood in our games consoles for instance? I can do all I truly need with our Wii even if I can't run SCUMMVM. Hell, I don't even have time to play all the games I've bought.</p><p>The iPad will be a great example of good enough technology. "The internet", in your lap, on this amazing looking little device. With movies, books, music and apps to boot. Joe and Jane Average are gonna think it's great.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most people here do n't see past their own noses... Myself , I like the iPad except for the fact that Apple decides what I can install... but that 's the whole point.The iPad is a platform , not a device.Most people just want stuff to work , and do n't want to care how .
Most of the time , so do I. I do n't want my stove in the kitchen to require a friggin manual to do basic cooking even if I could patch it to boil eggs 15 \ % faster I never would be bothered .
It 's the same for regular people with all tech , computers included .
People do n't want to know the details , they just want to tap on a movie/book/app/whatever , confirm their transaction , and have it all just work.The iPad can run iPhone apps , and the SDK is available now .
App developers will be falling over each other to be first with new apps taking advantage of the larger screen.I 'm very tempted , but still skeptical I 'll buy this myself .
The closed platform is an issue for me .
But most people could n't care less about what they ca n't do on a device like this , if they just can do all they want .
Freedom is great , but how many of us have truly bothered to go under the hood in our games consoles for instance ?
I can do all I truly need with our Wii even if I ca n't run SCUMMVM .
Hell , I do n't even have time to play all the games I 've bought.The iPad will be a great example of good enough technology .
" The internet " , in your lap , on this amazing looking little device .
With movies , books , music and apps to boot .
Joe and Jane Average are gon na think it 's great .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most people here don't see past their own noses... Myself, I like the iPad except for the fact that Apple decides what I can install... but that's the whole point.The iPad is a platform, not a device.Most people just want stuff to work, and don't want to care how.
Most of the time, so do I. I don't want my stove in the kitchen to require a friggin manual to do basic cooking even if I could patch it to boil eggs 15\% faster I never would be bothered.
It's the same for regular people with all tech, computers included.
People don't want to know the details, they just want to tap on a movie/book/app/whatever, confirm their transaction, and have it all just work.The iPad can run iPhone apps, and the SDK is available now.
App developers will be falling over each other to be first with new apps taking advantage of the larger screen.I'm very tempted, but still skeptical I'll buy this myself.
The closed platform is an issue for me.
But most people couldn't care less about what they can't do on a device like this, if they just can do all they want.
Freedom is great, but how many of us have truly bothered to go under the hood in our games consoles for instance?
I can do all I truly need with our Wii even if I can't run SCUMMVM.
Hell, I don't even have time to play all the games I've bought.The iPad will be a great example of good enough technology.
"The internet", in your lap, on this amazing looking little device.
With movies, books, music and apps to boot.
Joe and Jane Average are gonna think it's great.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922966</id>
	<title>Sadly, this is the entry item</title>
	<author>MistrBlank</author>
	<datestamp>1264625640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a product entry, just like the original iPhone was.  Now we just need tons of applications and iPad 4G and it will be a golden device.</p><p>Why would anyone get excited over 3G in this?  I'd still rather pay $60 over $30 a month and get a MiFi that I can use my iPhone, iPad, netbook, Xbox, PSP and home computers with.</p><p>Why doesn't this have wireless syncing?  Don't tell me they can't do it, the AppleTV does it easily.  Why does this still use that crappy dock connector, which also requires me to display the device in portrait mode on a dock?   Why doesn't it instead use the magnetic charger like the Macbook Air?   Can it use Airtunes speakers?  Where are the speakers located?  What is the screen resolution?</p><p>How is it Apple spent an hour and a half and told us nothing important about the product?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a product entry , just like the original iPhone was .
Now we just need tons of applications and iPad 4G and it will be a golden device.Why would anyone get excited over 3G in this ?
I 'd still rather pay $ 60 over $ 30 a month and get a MiFi that I can use my iPhone , iPad , netbook , Xbox , PSP and home computers with.Why does n't this have wireless syncing ?
Do n't tell me they ca n't do it , the AppleTV does it easily .
Why does this still use that crappy dock connector , which also requires me to display the device in portrait mode on a dock ?
Why does n't it instead use the magnetic charger like the Macbook Air ?
Can it use Airtunes speakers ?
Where are the speakers located ?
What is the screen resolution ? How is it Apple spent an hour and a half and told us nothing important about the product ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a product entry, just like the original iPhone was.
Now we just need tons of applications and iPad 4G and it will be a golden device.Why would anyone get excited over 3G in this?
I'd still rather pay $60 over $30 a month and get a MiFi that I can use my iPhone, iPad, netbook, Xbox, PSP and home computers with.Why doesn't this have wireless syncing?
Don't tell me they can't do it, the AppleTV does it easily.
Why does this still use that crappy dock connector, which also requires me to display the device in portrait mode on a dock?
Why doesn't it instead use the magnetic charger like the Macbook Air?
Can it use Airtunes speakers?
Where are the speakers located?
What is the screen resolution?How is it Apple spent an hour and a half and told us nothing important about the product?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922000</id>
	<title>Re:Is that the real actual name?</title>
	<author>Mr. Flibble</author>
	<datestamp>1264623480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ipad?? That sounds retarded... seriously. Even the Islate is better than that</p></div><p>Well, you see, this version with the 10" screen is the iPad. The newer version, with a larger screen will be called the <b>Maxipad</b>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ipad ? ?
That sounds retarded... seriously. Even the Islate is better than thatWell , you see , this version with the 10 " screen is the iPad .
The newer version , with a larger screen will be called the Maxipad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ipad??
That sounds retarded... seriously. Even the Islate is better than thatWell, you see, this version with the 10" screen is the iPad.
The newer version, with a larger screen will be called the Maxipad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928872</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Cyberllama</author>
	<datestamp>1264605840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that really so impossible a problem to engineer around? Just make it so you have to tap flash elements of a webpage to run them.  Then their not just draining my battery life with regular usage -- but if there's some specific reason that i want to be using flash, I can.  Win/win, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that really so impossible a problem to engineer around ?
Just make it so you have to tap flash elements of a webpage to run them .
Then their not just draining my battery life with regular usage -- but if there 's some specific reason that i want to be using flash , I can .
Win/win , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that really so impossible a problem to engineer around?
Just make it so you have to tap flash elements of a webpage to run them.
Then their not just draining my battery life with regular usage -- but if there's some specific reason that i want to be using flash, I can.
Win/win, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923888</id>
	<title>Might be perfect computer for mom.</title>
	<author>hostmaster</author>
	<datestamp>1264584720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think it's going to be another iphone, the market for tablets is not as big as that for smart-phones. But, I don't think it will be an apple-tv either.</p><p>It effectively kills the "electronic photo-book" market.  People are paying 70-150 for those things, that is now gone.  I like the leather-ish case which turns it into a keyboard type stand and into a photo-frame/tv stand, that seems like it will win some minds.</p><p>One wild-card in all of this is that it is the PERFECT computer to give your mom since it's got very simple icon entry into apps, and not too many complicated menus you have to sift through.  That might just lift it into another category of sales.  For people who use computer apps for different and varied tasks (say photoshop, or full-fledged spreadsheet use) this is never going to be enough. But for mom or grandma to keep photos rolling on her mantle so her friends can see them, to e-mail the kids, watch a few movies, maybe play some games, this may well be ideal.</p><p>My take is that this is not really designed for slashdot readers, it's yet another device to expand the market for apple computers to another type of user by offering a simple interface and the most frequently used features.  I suspect they'll succeed, especially since the entry-price is reasonable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think it 's going to be another iphone , the market for tablets is not as big as that for smart-phones .
But , I do n't think it will be an apple-tv either.It effectively kills the " electronic photo-book " market .
People are paying 70-150 for those things , that is now gone .
I like the leather-ish case which turns it into a keyboard type stand and into a photo-frame/tv stand , that seems like it will win some minds.One wild-card in all of this is that it is the PERFECT computer to give your mom since it 's got very simple icon entry into apps , and not too many complicated menus you have to sift through .
That might just lift it into another category of sales .
For people who use computer apps for different and varied tasks ( say photoshop , or full-fledged spreadsheet use ) this is never going to be enough .
But for mom or grandma to keep photos rolling on her mantle so her friends can see them , to e-mail the kids , watch a few movies , maybe play some games , this may well be ideal.My take is that this is not really designed for slashdot readers , it 's yet another device to expand the market for apple computers to another type of user by offering a simple interface and the most frequently used features .
I suspect they 'll succeed , especially since the entry-price is reasonable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think it's going to be another iphone, the market for tablets is not as big as that for smart-phones.
But, I don't think it will be an apple-tv either.It effectively kills the "electronic photo-book" market.
People are paying 70-150 for those things, that is now gone.
I like the leather-ish case which turns it into a keyboard type stand and into a photo-frame/tv stand, that seems like it will win some minds.One wild-card in all of this is that it is the PERFECT computer to give your mom since it's got very simple icon entry into apps, and not too many complicated menus you have to sift through.
That might just lift it into another category of sales.
For people who use computer apps for different and varied tasks (say photoshop, or full-fledged spreadsheet use) this is never going to be enough.
But for mom or grandma to keep photos rolling on her mantle so her friends can see them, to e-mail the kids, watch a few movies, maybe play some games, this may well be ideal.My take is that this is not really designed for slashdot readers, it's yet another device to expand the market for apple computers to another type of user by offering a simple interface and the most frequently used features.
I suspect they'll succeed, especially since the entry-price is reasonable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921864</id>
	<title>Re:No WCMDA/HSPA or even CDMA/EVDO is a huge miss</title>
	<author>slimjim8094</author>
	<datestamp>1264623240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they do have 3g. just announced</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they do have 3g .
just announced</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they do have 3g.
just announced</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921958</id>
	<title>Re:No 3g?</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1264623360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It has 3G on some models. $15 for 250MB / $30 unlimited. AT&amp;T (yuck). No contract though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It has 3G on some models .
$ 15 for 250MB / $ 30 unlimited .
AT&amp;T ( yuck ) .
No contract though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has 3G on some models.
$15 for 250MB / $30 unlimited.
AT&amp;T (yuck).
No contract though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929982</id>
	<title>and what about...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264617600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iPaid<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... brilliant advertising for Apple's "premium" products - look, Mom, I paid !!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iPaid ... brilliant advertising for Apple 's " premium " products - look , Mom , I paid ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iPaid ... brilliant advertising for Apple's "premium" products - look, Mom, I paid !!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30930764</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264670640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I want to see <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-disses-netbooks-again-2009-9" title="businessinsider.com" rel="nofollow">this picture</a> [businessinsider.com], but with a scratched iPad in place of the netbook.</p></div><p>Finally, a reason for Mr. Goatse's years of stretching<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to see this picture [ businessinsider.com ] , but with a scratched iPad in place of the netbook.Finally , a reason for Mr. Goatse 's years of stretching .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to see this picture [businessinsider.com], but with a scratched iPad in place of the netbook.Finally, a reason for Mr. Goatse's years of stretching ...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923266</id>
	<title>Reality Distortion Field</title>
	<author>stonecypher</author>
	<datestamp>1264583160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I lol'd while reading Jobs talking about how awesome it is to look at something on a rotated screen on a laptop, because I was reading it on a rotated screen on my year old laptop, and I have been doing generally that for the last ten years on my various other laptops.</p><p>All the same, Apple fans will be sure Steve invented this, just like they're sure he invented multitouch, standardized motion control, et cetera.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I lol 'd while reading Jobs talking about how awesome it is to look at something on a rotated screen on a laptop , because I was reading it on a rotated screen on my year old laptop , and I have been doing generally that for the last ten years on my various other laptops.All the same , Apple fans will be sure Steve invented this , just like they 're sure he invented multitouch , standardized motion control , et cetera .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I lol'd while reading Jobs talking about how awesome it is to look at something on a rotated screen on a laptop, because I was reading it on a rotated screen on my year old laptop, and I have been doing generally that for the last ten years on my various other laptops.All the same, Apple fans will be sure Steve invented this, just like they're sure he invented multitouch, standardized motion control, et cetera.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924836</id>
	<title>Apple does not need a netbook ...</title>
	<author>perpenso</author>
	<datestamp>1264587480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So Apple is basically saying that we should stop buying MacBooks and iPhones?</p></div></blockquote><p>

I'm going with:  Apple is basically saying that they do not need to introduce a netbook, that a pad is a better fit for this market.<br> <br>

I'm not 100\% sold on that idea but with iPhone apps supplemented by desktop apps like the iWorks apps that Apple demo'd I'd say the idea is plausible for many users.  Anyone else carry around an iPhone/iPod at home to check email and do lightweight browsing, too lazy to visit the computer?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)<br> <br>

--<br>
<a href="http://www.perpenso.com/calc/" title="perpenso.com" rel="nofollow">Perpenso Calc</a> [perpenso.com] for iPhone and iPod touch, scientific and bill/tip calculator, fractions, complex numbers, RPN</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So Apple is basically saying that we should stop buying MacBooks and iPhones ?
I 'm going with : Apple is basically saying that they do not need to introduce a netbook , that a pad is a better fit for this market .
I 'm not 100 \ % sold on that idea but with iPhone apps supplemented by desktop apps like the iWorks apps that Apple demo 'd I 'd say the idea is plausible for many users .
Anyone else carry around an iPhone/iPod at home to check email and do lightweight browsing , too lazy to visit the computer ?
: - ) -- Perpenso Calc [ perpenso.com ] for iPhone and iPod touch , scientific and bill/tip calculator , fractions , complex numbers , RPN</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Apple is basically saying that we should stop buying MacBooks and iPhones?
I'm going with:  Apple is basically saying that they do not need to introduce a netbook, that a pad is a better fit for this market.
I'm not 100\% sold on that idea but with iPhone apps supplemented by desktop apps like the iWorks apps that Apple demo'd I'd say the idea is plausible for many users.
Anyone else carry around an iPhone/iPod at home to check email and do lightweight browsing, too lazy to visit the computer?
:-) 

--
Perpenso Calc [perpenso.com] for iPhone and iPod touch, scientific and bill/tip calculator, fractions, complex numbers, RPN
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922168</id>
	<title>Re:No 3g?</title>
	<author>bloosh</author>
	<datestamp>1264623780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nobody thought to wait until the end to state it wouldn't support 3G??? The thing does indeed support 3G on AT&amp;T.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody thought to wait until the end to state it would n't support 3G ? ? ?
The thing does indeed support 3G on AT&amp;T .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody thought to wait until the end to state it wouldn't support 3G???
The thing does indeed support 3G on AT&amp;T.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923682</id>
	<title>Re:Pricing announced</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264584180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope, that's MB. Also, I'm skeptical of the 'unlimited' claim- At&amp;t only offers laptop connect plans up to 5gb/mo, and even those are double the price of the iPad's 'unlimited' plan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope , that 's MB .
Also , I 'm skeptical of the 'unlimited ' claim- At&amp;t only offers laptop connect plans up to 5gb/mo , and even those are double the price of the iPad 's 'unlimited ' plan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope, that's MB.
Also, I'm skeptical of the 'unlimited' claim- At&amp;t only offers laptop connect plans up to 5gb/mo, and even those are double the price of the iPad's 'unlimited' plan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923552</id>
	<title>Surfing with the Alien</title>
	<author>xactuary</author>
	<datestamp>1264583880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>E.T. here. WTF? I can't use it to phone home?</htmltext>
<tokenext>E.T .
here. WTF ?
I ca n't use it to phone home ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>E.T.
here. WTF?
I can't use it to phone home?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925304</id>
	<title>Re:underpowered?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264588920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It actually has a robust power source; it is powered almost entirely by the user's sense of self-importance.</p></div><p>If this were true it would never need charging.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It actually has a robust power source ; it is powered almost entirely by the user 's sense of self-importance.If this were true it would never need charging .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It actually has a robust power source; it is powered almost entirely by the user's sense of self-importance.If this were true it would never need charging.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926574</id>
	<title>Re:Typical techies and gadget freaks</title>
	<author>patSPLAT</author>
	<datestamp>1264592760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually you don't get it, the software is what makes this device nothing more than a giant iPhone.  Which is absurd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually you do n't get it , the software is what makes this device nothing more than a giant iPhone .
Which is absurd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually you don't get it, the software is what makes this device nothing more than a giant iPhone.
Which is absurd.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30932702</id>
	<title>Kindle Competition?</title>
	<author>assertation</author>
	<datestamp>1264691340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have Kindle using Macophile voracious reader friend.  He seems to think the iPad is no threat to the Kindle as the former will have a much shorter battery life.  Not the kind of thing that someone who wants to read on the couch for hours at time will prefer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have Kindle using Macophile voracious reader friend .
He seems to think the iPad is no threat to the Kindle as the former will have a much shorter battery life .
Not the kind of thing that someone who wants to read on the couch for hours at time will prefer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have Kindle using Macophile voracious reader friend.
He seems to think the iPad is no threat to the Kindle as the former will have a much shorter battery life.
Not the kind of thing that someone who wants to read on the couch for hours at time will prefer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921470</id>
	<title>Well, if there's one thing Apple fans need...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's a PAD!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's a PAD !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's a PAD!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921692</id>
	<title>Re:No WCMDA/HSPA or even CDMA/EVDO is a huge miss</title>
	<author>UnknowingFool</author>
	<datestamp>1264622820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>How can you claim to be making a mobile device if it does not have mobile broadband? This thing yearning for a mobile internet connection so bad. The only reason that I can think of is that Steve is waiting to deploy this on Verizon's coming LTE network.</p></div></blockquote><p>For the same reason that Apple never comments on new products.  Apple never said it was a mobile device.  It was all the rampant speculation on the internet that said it would come with 3G and use AT&amp;T/Verizon (varies with rumor site).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can you claim to be making a mobile device if it does not have mobile broadband ?
This thing yearning for a mobile internet connection so bad .
The only reason that I can think of is that Steve is waiting to deploy this on Verizon 's coming LTE network.For the same reason that Apple never comments on new products .
Apple never said it was a mobile device .
It was all the rampant speculation on the internet that said it would come with 3G and use AT&amp;T/Verizon ( varies with rumor site ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can you claim to be making a mobile device if it does not have mobile broadband?
This thing yearning for a mobile internet connection so bad.
The only reason that I can think of is that Steve is waiting to deploy this on Verizon's coming LTE network.For the same reason that Apple never comments on new products.
Apple never said it was a mobile device.
It was all the rampant speculation on the internet that said it would come with 3G and use AT&amp;T/Verizon (varies with rumor site).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923586</id>
	<title>Re:This fits squarely in the category of "meh"</title>
	<author>nyctopterus</author>
	<datestamp>1264584000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have an iPod Touch. I have always thought I wanted a 10-inch iPod Touch, because I use it for web browsing and eBook reading.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an iPod Touch .
I have always thought I wanted a 10-inch iPod Touch , because I use it for web browsing and eBook reading .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an iPod Touch.
I have always thought I wanted a 10-inch iPod Touch, because I use it for web browsing and eBook reading.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927212</id>
	<title>Re:time to put "i" names out to pasture</title>
	<author>masmullin</author>
	<datestamp>1264595100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sounds like a most apt naming scheme.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sounds like a most apt naming scheme .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sounds like a most apt naming scheme.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926098</id>
	<title>Re:Some possible design flaws</title>
	<author>Totenglocke</author>
	<datestamp>1264591320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>2) Nothing said about mouse support. Seriously, if I'm going to be using it for any type of document creation (and they seem to think people will, as they're providing iWorks in the app store), I don't want to have to use the screen for copy and paste. Lack of mouse support would be a killer for me.</p></div><p>I would assume that since it has bluetooth, you would be able to connect a bluetooth mouse to it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>2 ) Nothing said about mouse support .
Seriously , if I 'm going to be using it for any type of document creation ( and they seem to think people will , as they 're providing iWorks in the app store ) , I do n't want to have to use the screen for copy and paste .
Lack of mouse support would be a killer for me.I would assume that since it has bluetooth , you would be able to connect a bluetooth mouse to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2) Nothing said about mouse support.
Seriously, if I'm going to be using it for any type of document creation (and they seem to think people will, as they're providing iWorks in the app store), I don't want to have to use the screen for copy and paste.
Lack of mouse support would be a killer for me.I would assume that since it has bluetooth, you would be able to connect a bluetooth mouse to it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922928</id>
	<title>Re:Awkward keyboard usage</title>
	<author>gobbo</author>
	<datestamp>1264625580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Using a keyboard while the screen lays flat just seems awkward to me</p></div><p>it probably has a PVA (etc.) screen that has a wide viewing angle so putting it on the desk and typing should be serviceable, but typing on a screen is an enormous compromise anyway</p><p>bluetooth = 3rd party devices like a roll-up keyboard, etc.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Using a keyboard while the screen lays flat just seems awkward to meit probably has a PVA ( etc .
) screen that has a wide viewing angle so putting it on the desk and typing should be serviceable , but typing on a screen is an enormous compromise anywaybluetooth = 3rd party devices like a roll-up keyboard , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using a keyboard while the screen lays flat just seems awkward to meit probably has a PVA (etc.
) screen that has a wide viewing angle so putting it on the desk and typing should be serviceable, but typing on a screen is an enormous compromise anywaybluetooth = 3rd party devices like a roll-up keyboard, etc.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925584</id>
	<title>Re:Watching the presentation live...</title>
	<author>lowrydr310</author>
	<datestamp>1264589760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>iPad. 40\% more absorbent than iTampon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>iPad .
40 \ % more absorbent than iTampon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iPad.
40\% more absorbent than iTampon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925360</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Golddess</author>
	<datestamp>1264589160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some people would consider the lack of MMS and the ability to record video to be a feature.<br>
<br>
No, I do not have an iPhone.  I'm still using a 6 year old Sony-Erickson.  And I'm not saying people who use their phones for more than just making phone calls are stupid, just that calling a <b>phone</b> crippled because it can't do MMS or record video is a matter of opinion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some people would consider the lack of MMS and the ability to record video to be a feature .
No , I do not have an iPhone .
I 'm still using a 6 year old Sony-Erickson .
And I 'm not saying people who use their phones for more than just making phone calls are stupid , just that calling a phone crippled because it ca n't do MMS or record video is a matter of opinion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some people would consider the lack of MMS and the ability to record video to be a feature.
No, I do not have an iPhone.
I'm still using a 6 year old Sony-Erickson.
And I'm not saying people who use their phones for more than just making phone calls are stupid, just that calling a phone crippled because it can't do MMS or record video is a matter of opinion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927384</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't Create a Need</title>
	<author>Sheik Yerbouti</author>
	<datestamp>1264596000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bought a kindle for my wife I read stuff on it and I don't agree that e-Ink is more greatly more readable. I would rather have a back lit display especially for reading in bed. I think e-Ink is over hyped. It's monochrome and slow.</p><p>e-Inks real advantage is battery life. You are reading this and all of Slashdot and other sites on a back lit LCD probably and that works out great. I know I spend many hours a day reading on a computer screen and it works fine. So I think that aspect of eInk is overplayed a bit.</p><p>Personally I would rather have this iPad 10 inch display rather than the Kindle DX display. They are similar in price but the iPad does so much more with video, iPhoto, audio, web browsing, email, sweet looking organizer, and here's the big part. It's Apple so it will all work really slick and be really well integrated far more so than my 12" Asus netbook. I am still keeping the netbook too though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bought a kindle for my wife I read stuff on it and I do n't agree that e-Ink is more greatly more readable .
I would rather have a back lit display especially for reading in bed .
I think e-Ink is over hyped .
It 's monochrome and slow.e-Inks real advantage is battery life .
You are reading this and all of Slashdot and other sites on a back lit LCD probably and that works out great .
I know I spend many hours a day reading on a computer screen and it works fine .
So I think that aspect of eInk is overplayed a bit.Personally I would rather have this iPad 10 inch display rather than the Kindle DX display .
They are similar in price but the iPad does so much more with video , iPhoto , audio , web browsing , email , sweet looking organizer , and here 's the big part .
It 's Apple so it will all work really slick and be really well integrated far more so than my 12 " Asus netbook .
I am still keeping the netbook too though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bought a kindle for my wife I read stuff on it and I don't agree that e-Ink is more greatly more readable.
I would rather have a back lit display especially for reading in bed.
I think e-Ink is over hyped.
It's monochrome and slow.e-Inks real advantage is battery life.
You are reading this and all of Slashdot and other sites on a back lit LCD probably and that works out great.
I know I spend many hours a day reading on a computer screen and it works fine.
So I think that aspect of eInk is overplayed a bit.Personally I would rather have this iPad 10 inch display rather than the Kindle DX display.
They are similar in price but the iPad does so much more with video, iPhoto, audio, web browsing, email, sweet looking organizer, and here's the big part.
It's Apple so it will all work really slick and be really well integrated far more so than my 12" Asus netbook.
I am still keeping the netbook too though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923970</id>
	<title>Re:apple doubles prices again</title>
	<author>rahvin112</author>
	<datestamp>1264584960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In this case that ARM 1GHZ chip is about half the speed of the currently shipping N450 Atom. Sure it consumes a tenth of the power but is half the processing power worth half the electricity for twice the cost? ARM is supposed to be cheaper than Intel, not more expensive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In this case that ARM 1GHZ chip is about half the speed of the currently shipping N450 Atom .
Sure it consumes a tenth of the power but is half the processing power worth half the electricity for twice the cost ?
ARM is supposed to be cheaper than Intel , not more expensive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this case that ARM 1GHZ chip is about half the speed of the currently shipping N450 Atom.
Sure it consumes a tenth of the power but is half the processing power worth half the electricity for twice the cost?
ARM is supposed to be cheaper than Intel, not more expensive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924718</id>
	<title>Re:Awkward keyboard usage</title>
	<author>proslack</author>
	<datestamp>1264587120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure someone will be selling a third-party "iEasel" with attached keyboard and mouse for a few hundred bucks by next Christmas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure someone will be selling a third-party " iEasel " with attached keyboard and mouse for a few hundred bucks by next Christmas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure someone will be selling a third-party "iEasel" with attached keyboard and mouse for a few hundred bucks by next Christmas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921744</id>
	<title>iFlop</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the iPad, revolutionary, everyone will own one, just like the segway.</p><p>iPad, a new term to be added to the Apple dictionary along with, iFlop and the iFad</p><p>what does this sell for$$$</p><p>its cool anyway and I would buy one at $99</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the iPad , revolutionary , everyone will own one , just like the segway.iPad , a new term to be added to the Apple dictionary along with , iFlop and the iFadwhat does this sell for $ $ $ its cool anyway and I would buy one at $ 99</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the iPad, revolutionary, everyone will own one, just like the segway.iPad, a new term to be added to the Apple dictionary along with, iFlop and the iFadwhat does this sell for$$$its cool anyway and I would buy one at $99</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923674</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264584180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't know of any products with worse security records than Acrobat Reader and Flash.</p></div><p>Wait.. let me think hard... very hard.. Microsoft Windows? Nope, it was not hard at all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know of any products with worse security records than Acrobat Reader and Flash.Wait.. let me think hard... very hard.. Microsoft Windows ?
Nope , it was not hard at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know of any products with worse security records than Acrobat Reader and Flash.Wait.. let me think hard... very hard.. Microsoft Windows?
Nope, it was not hard at all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927056</id>
	<title>Re:Typical techies and gadget freaks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264594440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay, list the great elements of the software.  No multitasking on a 10" device.  The same apps you get on the iPod Touch.  This is not going anywhere revolutionary, its stagnant.  It would have been better named: "iPod Touch Big".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , list the great elements of the software .
No multitasking on a 10 " device .
The same apps you get on the iPod Touch .
This is not going anywhere revolutionary , its stagnant .
It would have been better named : " iPod Touch Big " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, list the great elements of the software.
No multitasking on a 10" device.
The same apps you get on the iPod Touch.
This is not going anywhere revolutionary, its stagnant.
It would have been better named: "iPod Touch Big".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921866</id>
	<title>is late</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264623240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What was wrong with the oft-rumored "iSlate" moniker?</p></div><p>"Ip ad" doesn't mean anything in English. "Is late" meant Duke Nukem Forever for several years.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What was wrong with the oft-rumored " iSlate " moniker ?
" Ip ad " does n't mean anything in English .
" Is late " meant Duke Nukem Forever for several years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What was wrong with the oft-rumored "iSlate" moniker?
"Ip ad" doesn't mean anything in English.
"Is late" meant Duke Nukem Forever for several years.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926198</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>wall0159</author>
	<datestamp>1264591620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"It is more like a Nexus One that won't fit in your pocket!"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...except that Apple decides what apps and hardware you can or can't use with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" It is more like a Nexus One that wo n't fit in your pocket !
" ...except that Apple decides what apps and hardware you can or ca n't use with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It is more like a Nexus One that won't fit in your pocket!
" ...except that Apple decides what apps and hardware you can or can't use with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922190</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>jo\_ham</author>
	<datestamp>1264623840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Youtube serves up an H.264 version of the video to your iPhone. Not all videos are converted yet (google is massively numbercrunching behind the scenes to convert older ones). If the phone meets a video with no H.264 version it just says "cannot display movie at this time" or something like that.</p><p>You can use ClickToFlash on Safari in 10.6 to tell the Youtube site to serve the H.264 iPhone version to your browser instead of the flash version too - much nicer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Youtube serves up an H.264 version of the video to your iPhone .
Not all videos are converted yet ( google is massively numbercrunching behind the scenes to convert older ones ) .
If the phone meets a video with no H.264 version it just says " can not display movie at this time " or something like that.You can use ClickToFlash on Safari in 10.6 to tell the Youtube site to serve the H.264 iPhone version to your browser instead of the flash version too - much nicer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Youtube serves up an H.264 version of the video to your iPhone.
Not all videos are converted yet (google is massively numbercrunching behind the scenes to convert older ones).
If the phone meets a video with no H.264 version it just says "cannot display movie at this time" or something like that.You can use ClickToFlash on Safari in 10.6 to tell the Youtube site to serve the H.264 iPhone version to your browser instead of the flash version too - much nicer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924810</id>
	<title>Cloud Storage is unreliable hype</title>
	<author>Zan Lynx</author>
	<datestamp>1264587360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For a mobile device to ignore cloud storage is not a bug, it is a feature. Sure, syncing local storage with the cloud is useful. But any mobile device of mine had better have useful data locally.</p><p>For example, GPS mapping applications. Those that rely on the cloud for data are useless anywhere off the data network. That is a lot of places. If you're lost somewhere in the Colorado mountains you may get GPS but cellular data service is laughably unlikely.</p><p>Books and music. It is incredibly annoying to press 'next page' and nothing happens because you've walked into a movie theater or are driving through a tunnel with no data service. It would be equally annoying to have the music stop because of that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For a mobile device to ignore cloud storage is not a bug , it is a feature .
Sure , syncing local storage with the cloud is useful .
But any mobile device of mine had better have useful data locally.For example , GPS mapping applications .
Those that rely on the cloud for data are useless anywhere off the data network .
That is a lot of places .
If you 're lost somewhere in the Colorado mountains you may get GPS but cellular data service is laughably unlikely.Books and music .
It is incredibly annoying to press 'next page ' and nothing happens because you 've walked into a movie theater or are driving through a tunnel with no data service .
It would be equally annoying to have the music stop because of that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a mobile device to ignore cloud storage is not a bug, it is a feature.
Sure, syncing local storage with the cloud is useful.
But any mobile device of mine had better have useful data locally.For example, GPS mapping applications.
Those that rely on the cloud for data are useless anywhere off the data network.
That is a lot of places.
If you're lost somewhere in the Colorado mountains you may get GPS but cellular data service is laughably unlikely.Books and music.
It is incredibly annoying to press 'next page' and nothing happens because you've walked into a movie theater or are driving through a tunnel with no data service.
It would be equally annoying to have the music stop because of that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</id>
	<title>Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>konadelux</author>
	<datestamp>1264622280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>So help me god this thing better have multitasking</htmltext>
<tokenext>So help me god this thing better have multitasking</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So help me god this thing better have multitasking</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921506</id>
	<title>Re:No WCMDA/HSPA or even CDMA/EVDO is a huge miss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They will wait until next year to show the new iPad 2.0 with innovative 3g capability.</p><p>Apple is always innovating.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They will wait until next year to show the new iPad 2.0 with innovative 3g capability.Apple is always innovating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They will wait until next year to show the new iPad 2.0 with innovative 3g capability.Apple is always innovating.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923460</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264583640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So help me <b>iGod</b> this thing better have multitasking</p></div><p>there, fixed that for you.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So help me iGod this thing better have multitaskingthere , fixed that for you .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So help me iGod this thing better have multitaskingthere, fixed that for you.
;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923326</id>
	<title>better info than sites in summary on apples page</title>
	<author>thenextstevejobs</author>
	<datestamp>1264583340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lots of info here: <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad" title="apple.com">http://www.apple.com/ipad</a> [apple.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lots of info here : http : //www.apple.com/ipad [ apple.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lots of info here: http://www.apple.com/ipad [apple.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923184</id>
	<title>Wonder if "MiFi" would be cheaper tho?</title>
	<author>JSBiff</author>
	<datestamp>1264583040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One interesting possibility, particularly if you think you'll have more than one iPad, iPhone, etc in your household might be to just get a Mifi(Myfi?) type device - you know, one of those Wifi-to-3G gateway devices some of the cell companies are trying to sell. It might not be cheaper for a single iPad (the number I saw listed for the 3G versions of the iPad was +$130 more than the 'base' iPad price). But if you have 2 or 3 of the iPads, Mifi seems like a better way to go?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One interesting possibility , particularly if you think you 'll have more than one iPad , iPhone , etc in your household might be to just get a Mifi ( Myfi ?
) type device - you know , one of those Wifi-to-3G gateway devices some of the cell companies are trying to sell .
It might not be cheaper for a single iPad ( the number I saw listed for the 3G versions of the iPad was + $ 130 more than the 'base ' iPad price ) .
But if you have 2 or 3 of the iPads , Mifi seems like a better way to go ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One interesting possibility, particularly if you think you'll have more than one iPad, iPhone, etc in your household might be to just get a Mifi(Myfi?
) type device - you know, one of those Wifi-to-3G gateway devices some of the cell companies are trying to sell.
It might not be cheaper for a single iPad (the number I saw listed for the 3G versions of the iPad was +$130 more than the 'base' iPad price).
But if you have 2 or 3 of the iPads, Mifi seems like a better way to go?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927950</id>
	<title>internal camera... in your butt maybe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264599240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Surprsingly, no built-in camera."</p><p>no duh cameras suck. Pop the lid and you got wiring routed all throughout the thing for that one camera and it sticks outward making it easy to snap off. Then dust gets on it just like the screen so it looks like crap and most of them already look horridly pixelated and minds well buy a high quality external one with far more features and movement options for lighting because *lighting* is the key thing with a camera. I'd rather have an obsolete floppy drive than an obsolete camera least then it doesn't stare at me haunting me for my delapidatedly poor choice in hardware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Surprsingly , no built-in camera .
" no duh cameras suck .
Pop the lid and you got wiring routed all throughout the thing for that one camera and it sticks outward making it easy to snap off .
Then dust gets on it just like the screen so it looks like crap and most of them already look horridly pixelated and minds well buy a high quality external one with far more features and movement options for lighting because * lighting * is the key thing with a camera .
I 'd rather have an obsolete floppy drive than an obsolete camera least then it does n't stare at me haunting me for my delapidatedly poor choice in hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Surprsingly, no built-in camera.
"no duh cameras suck.
Pop the lid and you got wiring routed all throughout the thing for that one camera and it sticks outward making it easy to snap off.
Then dust gets on it just like the screen so it looks like crap and most of them already look horridly pixelated and minds well buy a high quality external one with far more features and movement options for lighting because *lighting* is the key thing with a camera.
I'd rather have an obsolete floppy drive than an obsolete camera least then it doesn't stare at me haunting me for my delapidatedly poor choice in hardware.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921872</id>
	<title>Oh, Steve, Steve, Steve...</title>
	<author>Millennium</author>
	<datestamp>1264623240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come on. For three years now, people have known that uttering the words "Five hundred ninety-nine US Dollars" during the big unveil is a kiss of death. Did you <i>really</i> have to go and blow it like that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on .
For three years now , people have known that uttering the words " Five hundred ninety-nine US Dollars " during the big unveil is a kiss of death .
Did you really have to go and blow it like that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on.
For three years now, people have known that uttering the words "Five hundred ninety-nine US Dollars" during the big unveil is a kiss of death.
Did you really have to go and blow it like that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921208</id>
	<title>gay</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264621860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>as usual</htmltext>
<tokenext>as usual</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as usual</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922676</id>
	<title>Re:Pricing announced</title>
	<author>jandrese</author>
	<datestamp>1264624980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>(surely they mean Gb?)</p></div></blockquote><p>
You've never dealt with phone companies before have you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( surely they mean Gb ?
) You 've never dealt with phone companies before have you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(surely they mean Gb?
)
You've never dealt with phone companies before have you?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925210</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>D4MO</author>
	<datestamp>1264588620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/27/apple-ipad-first-hands-on/" title="engadget.com">Nope</a> [engadget.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope [ engadget.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope [engadget.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922034</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264623540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want to see <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-disses-netbooks-again-2009-9" title="businessinsider.com">this picture</a> [businessinsider.com], but with a scratched iPad in place of the netbook.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to see this picture [ businessinsider.com ] , but with a scratched iPad in place of the netbook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to see this picture [businessinsider.com], but with a scratched iPad in place of the netbook.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922274</id>
	<title>The iPon - New Announcement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For those customers who find the iPad to unwieldy we announce the iPon.  Instead of carrying it on you it can go in you.</p><p>xD  iPAD??<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) still laughing at that one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those customers who find the iPad to unwieldy we announce the iPon .
Instead of carrying it on you it can go in you.xD iPAD ? ?
: ) still laughing at that one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those customers who find the iPad to unwieldy we announce the iPon.
Instead of carrying it on you it can go in you.xD  iPAD??
:) still laughing at that one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926022</id>
	<title>Re:At a min 2x price of Kindle</title>
	<author>Totenglocke</author>
	<datestamp>1264591020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It starts $19 more than a Kindle DX and does a hell of a lot more than a Kindle DX.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It starts $ 19 more than a Kindle DX and does a hell of a lot more than a Kindle DX .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It starts $19 more than a Kindle DX and does a hell of a lot more than a Kindle DX.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30943046</id>
	<title>Re:Pros vs Cons</title>
	<author>docbrody</author>
	<datestamp>1264679760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>720p is NOT hd.</p></div><p>
You are wrong....
<br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition\_television#High-definition\_display\_resolutions" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition\_television#High-definition\_display\_resolutions</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>720p is NOT hd .
You are wrong... . http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition \ _television # High-definition \ _display \ _resolutions [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>720p is NOT hd.
You are wrong....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition\_television#High-definition\_display\_resolutions [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30930142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30932990</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Charybdis3</author>
	<datestamp>1264693140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nope.
Wait for jailbreak. (Isn't it annoying that you have to hack your iDevice to make it do what it should already?)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope .
Wait for jailbreak .
( Is n't it annoying that you have to hack your iDevice to make it do what it should already ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope.
Wait for jailbreak.
(Isn't it annoying that you have to hack your iDevice to make it do what it should already?
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924142</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264585440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He didn't say it does, therefore it doesn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He did n't say it does , therefore it does n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He didn't say it does, therefore it doesn't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926072</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>gaspar ilom</author>
	<datestamp>1264591200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be fair, Macromedia originally created Flash, not Adobe.  Macromedia made a better, more versatile plugin than any of the [also proprietary] competition.    Unfortunately, Adobe has now spread their funk to Macromedia. The FTC should never have allowed Adobe to buy their only competitor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair , Macromedia originally created Flash , not Adobe .
Macromedia made a better , more versatile plugin than any of the [ also proprietary ] competition .
Unfortunately , Adobe has now spread their funk to Macromedia .
The FTC should never have allowed Adobe to buy their only competitor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair, Macromedia originally created Flash, not Adobe.
Macromedia made a better, more versatile plugin than any of the [also proprietary] competition.
Unfortunately, Adobe has now spread their funk to Macromedia.
The FTC should never have allowed Adobe to buy their only competitor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30942500</id>
	<title>But what about writing?</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1264677780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see any discussion here about actually <i> writing </i> on the iPad, nor did I see any mention of it in the WWDC presentation. Since the screen is capacitive, is there any possibility that it can be used as a decent <i>notepad?</i></p><p>Honestly, considering the fact that "old school" tablets tout native pen support as a HUGE feature, I would be pretty disappointed if the iPad doesn't support it. However, Apple has the tendency to add significant features later in the product's lifecycle, so it might be a more viable purchase after a few updates. I'm also sure that there will be hackers out there who will be able to get OS X on it somehow, though I'm even more sure that Apple engineers thoroughly accounted for (and attempted to remove) that possibility.</p><p>I, for one, also think that the iPad will steamroll the netbook/eBook market in the months/years to come. If previous history is an indicator of anything, this will become THE device in about a year or two. Especially if people can write on it; imagine being able to actually UNDERLINE and write stuff in eBooks!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see any discussion here about actually writing on the iPad , nor did I see any mention of it in the WWDC presentation .
Since the screen is capacitive , is there any possibility that it can be used as a decent notepad ? Honestly , considering the fact that " old school " tablets tout native pen support as a HUGE feature , I would be pretty disappointed if the iPad does n't support it .
However , Apple has the tendency to add significant features later in the product 's lifecycle , so it might be a more viable purchase after a few updates .
I 'm also sure that there will be hackers out there who will be able to get OS X on it somehow , though I 'm even more sure that Apple engineers thoroughly accounted for ( and attempted to remove ) that possibility.I , for one , also think that the iPad will steamroll the netbook/eBook market in the months/years to come .
If previous history is an indicator of anything , this will become THE device in about a year or two .
Especially if people can write on it ; imagine being able to actually UNDERLINE and write stuff in eBooks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see any discussion here about actually  writing  on the iPad, nor did I see any mention of it in the WWDC presentation.
Since the screen is capacitive, is there any possibility that it can be used as a decent notepad?Honestly, considering the fact that "old school" tablets tout native pen support as a HUGE feature, I would be pretty disappointed if the iPad doesn't support it.
However, Apple has the tendency to add significant features later in the product's lifecycle, so it might be a more viable purchase after a few updates.
I'm also sure that there will be hackers out there who will be able to get OS X on it somehow, though I'm even more sure that Apple engineers thoroughly accounted for (and attempted to remove) that possibility.I, for one, also think that the iPad will steamroll the netbook/eBook market in the months/years to come.
If previous history is an indicator of anything, this will become THE device in about a year or two.
Especially if people can write on it; imagine being able to actually UNDERLINE and write stuff in eBooks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921778</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>zstlaw</author>
	<datestamp>1264623060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's more than just an iPod touch that won't fit in your pocket...it's also an underpowered netbook with no keyboard.  It's the worst of both worlds!</p></div><p>No no no!  It has a faster processor than the iTouch, better resolution that iPhone, and some nifty new features to make up for the lack of keyboard...  Iit is more like a Nexus One that won't fit in your pocket!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's more than just an iPod touch that wo n't fit in your pocket...it 's also an underpowered netbook with no keyboard .
It 's the worst of both worlds ! No no no !
It has a faster processor than the iTouch , better resolution that iPhone , and some nifty new features to make up for the lack of keyboard... Iit is more like a Nexus One that wo n't fit in your pocket !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's more than just an iPod touch that won't fit in your pocket...it's also an underpowered netbook with no keyboard.
It's the worst of both worlds!No no no!
It has a faster processor than the iTouch, better resolution that iPhone, and some nifty new features to make up for the lack of keyboard...  Iit is more like a Nexus One that won't fit in your pocket!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923036</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't Create a Need</title>
	<author>Darth Snowshoe</author>
	<datestamp>1264625880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Take a look at what all the red-shirts are carrying around onboard the Enterprise in Star Trek (any version).   It's essentially some flavor of this device - this form factor, these kinds of features.  Why is it you're willing to accept it (without even thinking about it) in your science fiction, but can't imagine anyone possibly wanting one in real life?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Take a look at what all the red-shirts are carrying around onboard the Enterprise in Star Trek ( any version ) .
It 's essentially some flavor of this device - this form factor , these kinds of features .
Why is it you 're willing to accept it ( without even thinking about it ) in your science fiction , but ca n't imagine anyone possibly wanting one in real life ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take a look at what all the red-shirts are carrying around onboard the Enterprise in Star Trek (any version).
It's essentially some flavor of this device - this form factor, these kinds of features.
Why is it you're willing to accept it (without even thinking about it) in your science fiction, but can't imagine anyone possibly wanting one in real life?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923452</id>
	<title>No Flash? No deal, and it's not just youTube</title>
	<author>yodleboy</author>
	<datestamp>1264583640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well... As soon as I saw this, I said "must have now" and then I saw "No Flash". Apple is essentially crippling the internet to protect their media position.  Sorry Steve, I have an iPhone and I have come to terms with lack of flash on it. However, for a device that's intended to compete with a netbook and be a portable computing platform, this just won't cut it.  Give us 6 months and we'll be seeing iPad clones in droves anyway. Devices that won't sacrifice functionality in order to protect their media distribution channel. It's really sad, because I was ready to swap this with my iPhone and get a bare bones cheap phone for calls.

Every time the lack of flash on iphone and now ipad is brought up, the debate revolves largely around video, and to a lesser degree around gaming.  Unfortunately, you're missing the bigger picture. It's not the big media sites, it's the little unexpected things, like when I go to a restaurant website to place a takeout order and the whole menu is only available as a flash app. it happens frequently. The flash issue for me is about these little interface apps that, without flash, are unusable; not some big honkin, cpu gobbling media site.  Sure, the designers should have a non flash version, but with 98\% of internet connected pc's having flash installed, well you can see why they don't bother.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well... As soon as I saw this , I said " must have now " and then I saw " No Flash " .
Apple is essentially crippling the internet to protect their media position .
Sorry Steve , I have an iPhone and I have come to terms with lack of flash on it .
However , for a device that 's intended to compete with a netbook and be a portable computing platform , this just wo n't cut it .
Give us 6 months and we 'll be seeing iPad clones in droves anyway .
Devices that wo n't sacrifice functionality in order to protect their media distribution channel .
It 's really sad , because I was ready to swap this with my iPhone and get a bare bones cheap phone for calls .
Every time the lack of flash on iphone and now ipad is brought up , the debate revolves largely around video , and to a lesser degree around gaming .
Unfortunately , you 're missing the bigger picture .
It 's not the big media sites , it 's the little unexpected things , like when I go to a restaurant website to place a takeout order and the whole menu is only available as a flash app .
it happens frequently .
The flash issue for me is about these little interface apps that , without flash , are unusable ; not some big honkin , cpu gobbling media site .
Sure , the designers should have a non flash version , but with 98 \ % of internet connected pc 's having flash installed , well you can see why they do n't bother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well... As soon as I saw this, I said "must have now" and then I saw "No Flash".
Apple is essentially crippling the internet to protect their media position.
Sorry Steve, I have an iPhone and I have come to terms with lack of flash on it.
However, for a device that's intended to compete with a netbook and be a portable computing platform, this just won't cut it.
Give us 6 months and we'll be seeing iPad clones in droves anyway.
Devices that won't sacrifice functionality in order to protect their media distribution channel.
It's really sad, because I was ready to swap this with my iPhone and get a bare bones cheap phone for calls.
Every time the lack of flash on iphone and now ipad is brought up, the debate revolves largely around video, and to a lesser degree around gaming.
Unfortunately, you're missing the bigger picture.
It's not the big media sites, it's the little unexpected things, like when I go to a restaurant website to place a takeout order and the whole menu is only available as a flash app.
it happens frequently.
The flash issue for me is about these little interface apps that, without flash, are unusable; not some big honkin, cpu gobbling media site.
Sure, the designers should have a non flash version, but with 98\% of internet connected pc's having flash installed, well you can see why they don't bother.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923342</id>
	<title>Name already in use.</title>
	<author>base3</author>
	<datestamp>1264583400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wonder if the guy who wrote <a href="http://www.apple.com/downloads/dashboard/business/ipad.html" title="apple.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [apple.com] will be upset.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wonder if the guy who wrote this [ apple.com ] will be upset .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wonder if the guy who wrote this [apple.com] will be upset.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927574</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>SimonTheSoundMan</author>
	<datestamp>1264597080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can you ask Apple to get a decent MPEG2 decoder for OS X too. Their codec which is used in all their processional applications from Final Cut to Quicktime Pro 7 all use a PowerPC only codec, and will only run on one core. Makes your Mac Pro struggle worse than h.264 encoded in flash player.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you ask Apple to get a decent MPEG2 decoder for OS X too .
Their codec which is used in all their processional applications from Final Cut to Quicktime Pro 7 all use a PowerPC only codec , and will only run on one core .
Makes your Mac Pro struggle worse than h.264 encoded in flash player .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you ask Apple to get a decent MPEG2 decoder for OS X too.
Their codec which is used in all their processional applications from Final Cut to Quicktime Pro 7 all use a PowerPC only codec, and will only run on one core.
Makes your Mac Pro struggle worse than h.264 encoded in flash player.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928542</id>
	<title>I have a use for one of these</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264603320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I currently use an iPod Touch as a convenient way to carry around a lot of photos (I'm a photographer). This will solve the only problem I have with the iPod Touch - the screen is too small. So I'm happy to see this announcement. I don't care if you want one. In fact, I'd be delighted if you don't want one - that way I'll be able to get one sooner. Please don't want one<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I currently use an iPod Touch as a convenient way to carry around a lot of photos ( I 'm a photographer ) .
This will solve the only problem I have with the iPod Touch - the screen is too small .
So I 'm happy to see this announcement .
I do n't care if you want one .
In fact , I 'd be delighted if you do n't want one - that way I 'll be able to get one sooner .
Please do n't want one : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I currently use an iPod Touch as a convenient way to carry around a lot of photos (I'm a photographer).
This will solve the only problem I have with the iPod Touch - the screen is too small.
So I'm happy to see this announcement.
I don't care if you want one.
In fact, I'd be delighted if you don't want one - that way I'll be able to get one sooner.
Please don't want one :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928698</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264604640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No multitasking, sorry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No multitasking , sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No multitasking, sorry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921816</id>
	<title>Now I really want Dvorak.</title>
	<author>Singularity42</author>
	<datestamp>1264623120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this is two-hand typing, Dvorak will be great for this.  There still isn't one for iPhone (just a hack if you jailbreak).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this is two-hand typing , Dvorak will be great for this .
There still is n't one for iPhone ( just a hack if you jailbreak ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this is two-hand typing, Dvorak will be great for this.
There still isn't one for iPhone (just a hack if you jailbreak).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929128</id>
	<title>Re:Typical techies and gadget freaks</title>
	<author>wfolta</author>
	<datestamp>1264608420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"nothing more than a giant iPhone"... OK. The size difference is a GOOD thing. Yes, the iPhone web browser is amazingly good, but it's SMALL. No way I'll sit there and read a website I care about, unless I'm pretty much desperately bored. The iPhone calendar is very useful, but it's SMALL. You can't see an entire day's activities, and certainly not a week- or month-at-a-glance with any meaningful content. Photos on the iPhone are handled well, but they're SMALL. More like passing a stack of drugstore prints than actual photos.</p><p>On the other hand, carrying my laptop for things like that is overkill. And the bulky form factor dictated by a keyboard just makes it worse.</p><p>THAT is where the iPad comes in handy: something that's simpler, significantly smaller, and a better form factor than a laptop/netbook, but with a large enough screen that I can see an entire day's worth of activity, I can read a web page basically as large as on my laptop, and I can see photos that are the size of photos. And read a book that's the size of a book: not the size of a deck of cards, and not the size of an old-school atlas.</p><p>So even if it were ONLY a giant iPhone (iPod Touch, really), it'd be a good and desirable device. But as far as I can tell, it's more than an iPhone/iPod in several ways, and it has untapped potential that we'll see more and more of in the next year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" nothing more than a giant iPhone " ... OK. The size difference is a GOOD thing .
Yes , the iPhone web browser is amazingly good , but it 's SMALL .
No way I 'll sit there and read a website I care about , unless I 'm pretty much desperately bored .
The iPhone calendar is very useful , but it 's SMALL .
You ca n't see an entire day 's activities , and certainly not a week- or month-at-a-glance with any meaningful content .
Photos on the iPhone are handled well , but they 're SMALL .
More like passing a stack of drugstore prints than actual photos.On the other hand , carrying my laptop for things like that is overkill .
And the bulky form factor dictated by a keyboard just makes it worse.THAT is where the iPad comes in handy : something that 's simpler , significantly smaller , and a better form factor than a laptop/netbook , but with a large enough screen that I can see an entire day 's worth of activity , I can read a web page basically as large as on my laptop , and I can see photos that are the size of photos .
And read a book that 's the size of a book : not the size of a deck of cards , and not the size of an old-school atlas.So even if it were ONLY a giant iPhone ( iPod Touch , really ) , it 'd be a good and desirable device .
But as far as I can tell , it 's more than an iPhone/iPod in several ways , and it has untapped potential that we 'll see more and more of in the next year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"nothing more than a giant iPhone"... OK. The size difference is a GOOD thing.
Yes, the iPhone web browser is amazingly good, but it's SMALL.
No way I'll sit there and read a website I care about, unless I'm pretty much desperately bored.
The iPhone calendar is very useful, but it's SMALL.
You can't see an entire day's activities, and certainly not a week- or month-at-a-glance with any meaningful content.
Photos on the iPhone are handled well, but they're SMALL.
More like passing a stack of drugstore prints than actual photos.On the other hand, carrying my laptop for things like that is overkill.
And the bulky form factor dictated by a keyboard just makes it worse.THAT is where the iPad comes in handy: something that's simpler, significantly smaller, and a better form factor than a laptop/netbook, but with a large enough screen that I can see an entire day's worth of activity, I can read a web page basically as large as on my laptop, and I can see photos that are the size of photos.
And read a book that's the size of a book: not the size of a deck of cards, and not the size of an old-school atlas.So even if it were ONLY a giant iPhone (iPod Touch, really), it'd be a good and desirable device.
But as far as I can tell, it's more than an iPhone/iPod in several ways, and it has untapped potential that we'll see more and more of in the next year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922538</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, you mean we could see the iTampon and iDouche too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , you mean we could see the iTampon and iDouche too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, you mean we could see the iTampon and iDouche too?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924494</id>
	<title>Re:Magical + Corner of Technology &amp; Liberal Ar</title>
	<author>Prien715</author>
	<datestamp>1264586520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>As an IT worker that sounds like the most horrible place on Earth.</i></p><p>Are you in China hanging out on the corner of the WoW sweatshop and the red light district?  Would you like to?  Outsourcing gives our company the cost control we need with the benefits you deserve!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As an IT worker that sounds like the most horrible place on Earth.Are you in China hanging out on the corner of the WoW sweatshop and the red light district ?
Would you like to ?
Outsourcing gives our company the cost control we need with the benefits you deserve !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an IT worker that sounds like the most horrible place on Earth.Are you in China hanging out on the corner of the WoW sweatshop and the red light district?
Would you like to?
Outsourcing gives our company the cost control we need with the benefits you deserve!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923410</id>
	<title>The Flava-Flav of iPhones</title>
	<author>twilliam</author>
	<datestamp>1264583580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get Flava Flav to put an iPad around his neck for a week and tell everyone it's his new custom iPhone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get Flava Flav to put an iPad around his neck for a week and tell everyone it 's his new custom iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get Flava Flav to put an iPad around his neck for a week and tell everyone it's his new custom iPhone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924634</id>
	<title>Re:Taking Jobs at his word</title>
	<author>proslack</author>
	<datestamp>1264586940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Which would be paraphrased as "Less screen space than a laptop and much bulkier than a phone." A phone for trolls or a laptop for dwarves...in other words, a device with great sales potential in Middle Earth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Which would be paraphrased as " Less screen space than a laptop and much bulkier than a phone .
" A phone for trolls or a laptop for dwarves...in other words , a device with great sales potential in Middle Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which would be paraphrased as "Less screen space than a laptop and much bulkier than a phone.
" A phone for trolls or a laptop for dwarves...in other words, a device with great sales potential in Middle Earth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927466</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>nobodyman</author>
	<datestamp>1264596420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>. If the phone meets a video with no H.264 version it just says "cannot display movie at this time" or something like that.</p></div></blockquote><p>Actually, it seems like the act of requesting the h.264 version for the conversion process.  When I receive the "cannot display movie" message, it'll usually play just fine if I request it a second time.  Perhaps by second attempt youtube has converted the video.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>.
If the phone meets a video with no H.264 version it just says " can not display movie at this time " or something like that.Actually , it seems like the act of requesting the h.264 version for the conversion process .
When I receive the " can not display movie " message , it 'll usually play just fine if I request it a second time .
Perhaps by second attempt youtube has converted the video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
If the phone meets a video with no H.264 version it just says "cannot display movie at this time" or something like that.Actually, it seems like the act of requesting the h.264 version for the conversion process.
When I receive the "cannot display movie" message, it'll usually play just fine if I request it a second time.
Perhaps by second attempt youtube has converted the video.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931288</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>GNious</author>
	<datestamp>1264677240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Also, what's the PRICE on this thing?</p></div><p>The other day I saw an iPhone 3GS at little over &euro;1000 - these things seems to be cheap!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , what 's the PRICE on this thing ? The other day I saw an iPhone 3GS at little over    1000 - these things seems to be cheap !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Also, what's the PRICE on this thing?The other day I saw an iPhone 3GS at little over €1000 - these things seems to be cheap!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921794</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't Create a Need</title>
	<author>Professor\_UNIX</author>
	<datestamp>1264623060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This product reminds me of the Macbook Air.  That was another one of their products that was created to fill some apparent missing niche between smartphones, PDAs, and full blown laptops and where has that got them?  It is essentially worthless and priced MORE than a full blown Macbook or 13" Macbook Pro.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This product reminds me of the Macbook Air .
That was another one of their products that was created to fill some apparent missing niche between smartphones , PDAs , and full blown laptops and where has that got them ?
It is essentially worthless and priced MORE than a full blown Macbook or 13 " Macbook Pro .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This product reminds me of the Macbook Air.
That was another one of their products that was created to fill some apparent missing niche between smartphones, PDAs, and full blown laptops and where has that got them?
It is essentially worthless and priced MORE than a full blown Macbook or 13" Macbook Pro.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922742</id>
	<title>Re:No 3g?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264625100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's built in. Two models, one with Wifi, one with Wifi and 3G. Unlocked 3G, any carrier using the micro-sim format.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's built in .
Two models , one with Wifi , one with Wifi and 3G .
Unlocked 3G , any carrier using the micro-sim format .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's built in.
Two models, one with Wifi, one with Wifi and 3G.
Unlocked 3G, any carrier using the micro-sim format.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925428</id>
	<title>Re:Typical techies and gadget freaks</title>
	<author>Princeofcups</author>
	<datestamp>1264589340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>After reading the comments here and on Engadget, it just confirms that your average techie doesn't know a great new product when he sees it. So many people seem to be complaining that it doesn't have some certain deal-breaking hardware feature, yet they haven't even noticed the most important innovation: The software. The greatest part of this device simply flies over the head of so many people here because they have no understanding about what makes a computer great to use.</p></div><p>Exactly.  Within minutes of the announcement people here at work were already talking about it.  Besides, the original iPod didn't play games or movies, only music.  This is just the first iteration of the product, and I'm sure that Apple has a roadmap of potential future functionality and features.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>After reading the comments here and on Engadget , it just confirms that your average techie does n't know a great new product when he sees it .
So many people seem to be complaining that it does n't have some certain deal-breaking hardware feature , yet they have n't even noticed the most important innovation : The software .
The greatest part of this device simply flies over the head of so many people here because they have no understanding about what makes a computer great to use.Exactly .
Within minutes of the announcement people here at work were already talking about it .
Besides , the original iPod did n't play games or movies , only music .
This is just the first iteration of the product , and I 'm sure that Apple has a roadmap of potential future functionality and features .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After reading the comments here and on Engadget, it just confirms that your average techie doesn't know a great new product when he sees it.
So many people seem to be complaining that it doesn't have some certain deal-breaking hardware feature, yet they haven't even noticed the most important innovation: The software.
The greatest part of this device simply flies over the head of so many people here because they have no understanding about what makes a computer great to use.Exactly.
Within minutes of the announcement people here at work were already talking about it.
Besides, the original iPod didn't play games or movies, only music.
This is just the first iteration of the product, and I'm sure that Apple has a roadmap of potential future functionality and features.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926766</id>
	<title>Re:No stylus eh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264593360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I really hope you're being sarcastic. If not, here's a hint - I just used a butter knife to navigate my ipod touch. Maybe not the most ergonomic "stylus" but functional. More importantly, it means that it is painfully simple to make your own stylus.</p></div><p>Can you also take notes with your butter knife?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)  I had hoped to use this as a note taking device instead of a tablet of paper (make them searchable etc.).  Then I could browse the web during boring meetings.  I guess I'm not in the target market for this device though.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really hope you 're being sarcastic .
If not , here 's a hint - I just used a butter knife to navigate my ipod touch .
Maybe not the most ergonomic " stylus " but functional .
More importantly , it means that it is painfully simple to make your own stylus.Can you also take notes with your butter knife ?
: - ) I had hoped to use this as a note taking device instead of a tablet of paper ( make them searchable etc. ) .
Then I could browse the web during boring meetings .
I guess I 'm not in the target market for this device though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really hope you're being sarcastic.
If not, here's a hint - I just used a butter knife to navigate my ipod touch.
Maybe not the most ergonomic "stylus" but functional.
More importantly, it means that it is painfully simple to make your own stylus.Can you also take notes with your butter knife?
:-)  I had hoped to use this as a note taking device instead of a tablet of paper (make them searchable etc.).
Then I could browse the web during boring meetings.
I guess I'm not in the target market for this device though.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922390</id>
	<title>Re:Pricing announced</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The pricing of the unit is terrific, the AT&amp;T pricing is crap. I'll definitely be buying one, but I have a specialized homebrew app where a large multi-touch screen for a control surface is very beneficial.</p><p>Anyone have any real info on the processor, and especially how it compares with the performance of the different generations of iPhone? The iPhone actually has a fair amount of processing power, especially once you offload the graphics to OpenGL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The pricing of the unit is terrific , the AT&amp;T pricing is crap .
I 'll definitely be buying one , but I have a specialized homebrew app where a large multi-touch screen for a control surface is very beneficial.Anyone have any real info on the processor , and especially how it compares with the performance of the different generations of iPhone ?
The iPhone actually has a fair amount of processing power , especially once you offload the graphics to OpenGL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The pricing of the unit is terrific, the AT&amp;T pricing is crap.
I'll definitely be buying one, but I have a specialized homebrew app where a large multi-touch screen for a control surface is very beneficial.Anyone have any real info on the processor, and especially how it compares with the performance of the different generations of iPhone?
The iPhone actually has a fair amount of processing power, especially once you offload the graphics to OpenGL.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926346</id>
	<title>Re:time to put "i" names out to pasture</title>
	<author>Thelasko</author>
	<datestamp>1264592100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> iPad sounds like digital Kotex...</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2010/01/ipad\_apples\_way\_of\_reaching\_ou.html?sc=fb&amp;cc=fp" title="npr.org">NPR actually has a story about this.</a> [npr.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>iPad sounds like digital Kotex... NPR actually has a story about this .
[ npr.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> iPad sounds like digital Kotex... NPR actually has a story about this.
[npr.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926670</id>
	<title>Re:Fantastic!</title>
	<author>complete loony</author>
	<datestamp>1264593060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But now there's an (almost) shipping product, there's a whole range of new topics to discuss. Like; will it blend, a step by step dis-assembly, etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But now there 's an ( almost ) shipping product , there 's a whole range of new topics to discuss .
Like ; will it blend , a step by step dis-assembly , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But now there's an (almost) shipping product, there's a whole range of new topics to discuss.
Like; will it blend, a step by step dis-assembly, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928584</id>
	<title>Alternatives?</title>
	<author>mordenkhai</author>
	<datestamp>1264603740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a college student, the iPad interests me in being a replacement for regular paper notebooks.  I'd like to be able to take notes, via a real or virtual keyboard, as well as use a stylus for when I need to take non text notes, ideally on the same 'page'.  Being able to browse the web during or between classes in order to get reference documents would be very nice. It is kinda of a pain on my phone, given its size.  Add in 3G, and the iPad seems like it would fill the role well enough.  I wish it had more storage space, and memory card slots however.

So many people are saying this iPad is a flop in the making and that there are other alternatives.  I see people say how great their tablet is, but so few people name them.  So what other options are out there, in the $500-$700 range.  I saw some very nice machines for $1500 but I just do not want to spend that much.

Suggestions?</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a college student , the iPad interests me in being a replacement for regular paper notebooks .
I 'd like to be able to take notes , via a real or virtual keyboard , as well as use a stylus for when I need to take non text notes , ideally on the same 'page' .
Being able to browse the web during or between classes in order to get reference documents would be very nice .
It is kinda of a pain on my phone , given its size .
Add in 3G , and the iPad seems like it would fill the role well enough .
I wish it had more storage space , and memory card slots however .
So many people are saying this iPad is a flop in the making and that there are other alternatives .
I see people say how great their tablet is , but so few people name them .
So what other options are out there , in the $ 500- $ 700 range .
I saw some very nice machines for $ 1500 but I just do not want to spend that much .
Suggestions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a college student, the iPad interests me in being a replacement for regular paper notebooks.
I'd like to be able to take notes, via a real or virtual keyboard, as well as use a stylus for when I need to take non text notes, ideally on the same 'page'.
Being able to browse the web during or between classes in order to get reference documents would be very nice.
It is kinda of a pain on my phone, given its size.
Add in 3G, and the iPad seems like it would fill the role well enough.
I wish it had more storage space, and memory card slots however.
So many people are saying this iPad is a flop in the making and that there are other alternatives.
I see people say how great their tablet is, but so few people name them.
So what other options are out there, in the $500-$700 range.
I saw some very nice machines for $1500 but I just do not want to spend that much.
Suggestions?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923806</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1264584480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because the movie file is not flash. Flash plays a movie file. Apple grabs that file and plays it in something else.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the movie file is not flash .
Flash plays a movie file .
Apple grabs that file and plays it in something else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the movie file is not flash.
Flash plays a movie file.
Apple grabs that file and plays it in something else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923948</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Judge\_Fire</author>
	<datestamp>1264584840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Er, Flash isn't on the iPhone? How come I'm able to watch all those youtube and other web movies on mine then?</p></div><p>Because you're actually watching h.264, not Flash. YouTube converted their stuff, as did Vimeo and now support both. This was partly for HTML5, too.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Er , Flash is n't on the iPhone ?
How come I 'm able to watch all those youtube and other web movies on mine then ? Because you 're actually watching h.264 , not Flash .
YouTube converted their stuff , as did Vimeo and now support both .
This was partly for HTML5 , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Er, Flash isn't on the iPhone?
How come I'm able to watch all those youtube and other web movies on mine then?Because you're actually watching h.264, not Flash.
YouTube converted their stuff, as did Vimeo and now support both.
This was partly for HTML5, too.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924356</id>
	<title>Re:With that weak processor?</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1264586100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, if it's running on ARM, you can stick linux on it.  I wonder if it has any USB pads on the motherboard that could be wired to an internal GPS, like some people did with the EEE.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , if it 's running on ARM , you can stick linux on it .
I wonder if it has any USB pads on the motherboard that could be wired to an internal GPS , like some people did with the EEE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, if it's running on ARM, you can stick linux on it.
I wonder if it has any USB pads on the motherboard that could be wired to an internal GPS, like some people did with the EEE.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931158</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264675380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Flash has been H.264 for over 2 years. It's time for Web publishers to stop forcing Flash on us and just give us the raw video and let us play it in whatever player we like.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Flash has been H.264 for over 2 years .
It 's time for Web publishers to stop forcing Flash on us and just give us the raw video and let us play it in whatever player we like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flash has been H.264 for over 2 years.
It's time for Web publishers to stop forcing Flash on us and just give us the raw video and let us play it in whatever player we like.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30932158</id>
	<title>Re:time to put "i" names out to pasture</title>
	<author>Quantumstate</author>
	<datestamp>1264687980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only that but the name has been trademarked by Fujitsu <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry\_sectors/technology/article7006023.ece" title="timesonline.co.uk">http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry\_sectors/technology/article7006023.ece</a> [timesonline.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only that but the name has been trademarked by Fujitsu http : //business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry \ _sectors/technology/article7006023.ece [ timesonline.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only that but the name has been trademarked by Fujitsu http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry\_sectors/technology/article7006023.ece [timesonline.co.uk]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921340</id>
	<title>Oblig</title>
	<author>fiannaFailMan</author>
	<datestamp>1264622160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No wireless .
Less space than a Nomad .
Lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No wireless.
Less space than a Nomad.
Lame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923668</id>
	<title>LoC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264584180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.</p></div><p>No neural interface. Less space than the Library of Congress. Lame.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No wireless .
Less space than a Nomad .
Lame.No neural interface .
Less space than the Library of Congress .
Lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No wireless.
Less space than a Nomad.
Lame.No neural interface.
Less space than the Library of Congress.
Lame.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926888</id>
	<title>Re:Might be perfect computer for mom.</title>
	<author>sxtxixtxcxh</author>
	<datestamp>1264593780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>this whole thread, and you're the only one who actually hit the nail on the head. let me guess, you spend the holidays doing tech support too?</htmltext>
<tokenext>this whole thread , and you 're the only one who actually hit the nail on the head .
let me guess , you spend the holidays doing tech support too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this whole thread, and you're the only one who actually hit the nail on the head.
let me guess, you spend the holidays doing tech support too?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>eln</author>
	<datestamp>1264622220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's more than just an iPod touch that won't fit in your pocket...it's also an underpowered netbook with no keyboard.  It's the worst of both worlds!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's more than just an iPod touch that wo n't fit in your pocket...it 's also an underpowered netbook with no keyboard .
It 's the worst of both worlds !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's more than just an iPod touch that won't fit in your pocket...it's also an underpowered netbook with no keyboard.
It's the worst of both worlds!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924314</id>
	<title>Re:Backlit and eyestrain</title>
	<author>GraZZ</author>
	<datestamp>1264585980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, my eyes are so burnt from using my laptop in the dark that they PREFER a backlight!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , my eyes are so burnt from using my laptop in the dark that they PREFER a backlight !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, my eyes are so burnt from using my laptop in the dark that they PREFER a backlight!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923282</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264583220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Disappointing. I mean, 500 bucks for just an LCD glass, 16G flash and an unheard-of processor...?? They'll make a ton of money selling this, I bet. There's no microphone, no camera, no Skype, no way to telecommunicate with this one. Not even USB for connecting external camera or microphone. That's just a platform for selling apps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Disappointing .
I mean , 500 bucks for just an LCD glass , 16G flash and an unheard-of processor... ? ?
They 'll make a ton of money selling this , I bet .
There 's no microphone , no camera , no Skype , no way to telecommunicate with this one .
Not even USB for connecting external camera or microphone .
That 's just a platform for selling apps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disappointing.
I mean, 500 bucks for just an LCD glass, 16G flash and an unheard-of processor...??
They'll make a ton of money selling this, I bet.
There's no microphone, no camera, no Skype, no way to telecommunicate with this one.
Not even USB for connecting external camera or microphone.
That's just a platform for selling apps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926846</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>KlaymenDK</author>
	<datestamp>1264593660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Same situation on Android's "YouTube" application, btw.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Same situation on Android 's " YouTube " application , btw .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same situation on Android's "YouTube" application, btw.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925674</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264590000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's the best 'iPad' joke i have head all day. Kudos!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the best 'iPad ' joke i have head all day .
Kudos !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the best 'iPad' joke i have head all day.
Kudos!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30932452</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>LanMan04</author>
	<datestamp>1264689960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Apple has always released crippled products and insisted that they were superior.</p></div><p>Yeah, I really hate my substandard octo-core 2.8GHz Xeon Mac Pro with 18GB of memory.  So crippled.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple has always released crippled products and insisted that they were superior.Yeah , I really hate my substandard octo-core 2.8GHz Xeon Mac Pro with 18GB of memory .
So crippled .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple has always released crippled products and insisted that they were superior.Yeah, I really hate my substandard octo-core 2.8GHz Xeon Mac Pro with 18GB of memory.
So crippled.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925402</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1264589280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>every wannabe geek and fashion victim</i></p><p>Real nerds are never fashion victims. When I was a kid, even if I hadn't carried a slide rule my coke bottle glasses would have given me away.</p><p>I never in my life ever thought that being a nerd would ever become cool. What a world!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>every wannabe geek and fashion victimReal nerds are never fashion victims .
When I was a kid , even if I had n't carried a slide rule my coke bottle glasses would have given me away.I never in my life ever thought that being a nerd would ever become cool .
What a world !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>every wannabe geek and fashion victimReal nerds are never fashion victims.
When I was a kid, even if I hadn't carried a slide rule my coke bottle glasses would have given me away.I never in my life ever thought that being a nerd would ever become cool.
What a world!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922900</id>
	<title>Just wait for their next announcement...</title>
	<author>Daetrin</author>
	<datestamp>1264625460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's immature, i know, but the name keeps making me think that they will announce a stylus for use with the iPad, called the iTampon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's immature , i know , but the name keeps making me think that they will announce a stylus for use with the iPad , called the iTampon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's immature, i know, but the name keeps making me think that they will announce a stylus for use with the iPad, called the iTampon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921704</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know!<br>Man, I wish they'd make a smaller version I could put in my pockets and maybe make calls with?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...oh wait!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know ! Man , I wish they 'd make a smaller version I could put in my pockets and maybe make calls with ?
...oh wait !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know!Man, I wish they'd make a smaller version I could put in my pockets and maybe make calls with?
...oh wait!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921660</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>Tobor the Eighth Man</author>
	<datestamp>1264622760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My biggest problem with this is that it seems to be locked into the app store, just like the iPhone. In that sense, it does LESS than a netbook. Not saying this won't be successful, since Apple is nothing if not great at marketing consumer electronics, but what does this do for me task-wise that I can't do on a netbook? It's especially funny because, if you noticed, one of Jobs's slides touted PC software as a downside to netbooks. From where I stand, the huge open architecture of the PC is preferable to a tightly controlled store.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My biggest problem with this is that it seems to be locked into the app store , just like the iPhone .
In that sense , it does LESS than a netbook .
Not saying this wo n't be successful , since Apple is nothing if not great at marketing consumer electronics , but what does this do for me task-wise that I ca n't do on a netbook ?
It 's especially funny because , if you noticed , one of Jobs 's slides touted PC software as a downside to netbooks .
From where I stand , the huge open architecture of the PC is preferable to a tightly controlled store .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My biggest problem with this is that it seems to be locked into the app store, just like the iPhone.
In that sense, it does LESS than a netbook.
Not saying this won't be successful, since Apple is nothing if not great at marketing consumer electronics, but what does this do for me task-wise that I can't do on a netbook?
It's especially funny because, if you noticed, one of Jobs's slides touted PC software as a downside to netbooks.
From where I stand, the huge open architecture of the PC is preferable to a tightly controlled store.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921580</id>
	<title>Mediocre</title>
	<author>hh4m</author>
	<datestamp>1264622580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shares of Apple dropped 1.68 percent, or 3.46 dollars as Jobs took the stage and unveiled the new device.<br>
<br>
btw, the 64GB version is called iPad MaXi!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Shares of Apple dropped 1.68 percent , or 3.46 dollars as Jobs took the stage and unveiled the new device .
btw , the 64GB version is called iPad MaXi !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shares of Apple dropped 1.68 percent, or 3.46 dollars as Jobs took the stage and unveiled the new device.
btw, the 64GB version is called iPad MaXi!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923728</id>
	<title>Re:Pricing announced</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264584300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The storage is actually 16GB, 32GB, and 64GB at those prices.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The storage is actually 16GB , 32GB , and 64GB at those prices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The storage is actually 16GB, 32GB, and 64GB at those prices.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927208</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't Create a Need</title>
	<author>bobstreo</author>
	<datestamp>1264595100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I am now waiting for:</p><p>7-10 inch touchscreen</p><p>wifi/Bluetooth</p><p>IR and RF (LOL Logitech) for controlling my home theater and home automation.</p><p>Linux/Android...</p><p>microsd support up to 128GB.</p><p>It would be nice if I could roll it up/fold it up and put it in my pocket.</p><p>Maybe a nice HDMI out with 1080P support.</p><p>Under $300 (USD).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I am now waiting for : 7-10 inch touchscreenwifi/BluetoothIR and RF ( LOL Logitech ) for controlling my home theater and home automation.Linux/Android...microsd support up to 128GB.It would be nice if I could roll it up/fold it up and put it in my pocket.Maybe a nice HDMI out with 1080P support.Under $ 300 ( USD ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I am now waiting for:7-10 inch touchscreenwifi/BluetoothIR and RF (LOL Logitech) for controlling my home theater and home automation.Linux/Android...microsd support up to 128GB.It would be nice if I could roll it up/fold it up and put it in my pocket.Maybe a nice HDMI out with 1080P support.Under $300 (USD).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925356</id>
	<title>Re:The iPad is a Platform</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264589100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't want my stove in the kitchen to require a friggin manual to do basic cooking even if I could patch it to boil eggs 15\% faster I never would be bothered.</p></div><p>Of course you would<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-). Are you seriously telling me that you'd be able to resist a Linux powered, programmable stove?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't want my stove in the kitchen to require a friggin manual to do basic cooking even if I could patch it to boil eggs 15 \ % faster I never would be bothered.Of course you would ; - ) .
Are you seriously telling me that you 'd be able to resist a Linux powered , programmable stove ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't want my stove in the kitchen to require a friggin manual to do basic cooking even if I could patch it to boil eggs 15\% faster I never would be bothered.Of course you would ;-).
Are you seriously telling me that you'd be able to resist a Linux powered, programmable stove?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922866</id>
	<title>Glass...</title>
	<author>oh2</author>
	<datestamp>1264625400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The front of the thing is glass. I was enthusiastic until I realized that a 10" glass plate at the front doesnt make for a portable device thats very tough. I bet theres a very good reason they designed that sleeve for it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The front of the thing is glass .
I was enthusiastic until I realized that a 10 " glass plate at the front doesnt make for a portable device thats very tough .
I bet theres a very good reason they designed that sleeve for it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The front of the thing is glass.
I was enthusiastic until I realized that a 10" glass plate at the front doesnt make for a portable device thats very tough.
I bet theres a very good reason they designed that sleeve for it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931204</id>
	<title>Re:Typical techies and gadget freaks</title>
	<author>klui</author>
	<datestamp>1264676100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Enjoy your 800x600 screen while I use my 1920x1200.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Enjoy your 800x600 screen while I use my 1920x1200 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enjoy your 800x600 screen while I use my 1920x1200.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923446</id>
	<title>Re:Taking Jobs at his word</title>
	<author>Loco3KGT</author>
	<datestamp>1264583640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Serious question -   does it do phone calls? I saw microphone and speaker listed as features, but I saw nothing about voice calls.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Serious question - does it do phone calls ?
I saw microphone and speaker listed as features , but I saw nothing about voice calls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Serious question -   does it do phone calls?
I saw microphone and speaker listed as features, but I saw nothing about voice calls.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921760</id>
	<title>Entirely underwhelming.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264622940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So it's a bloated iPod Touch. That's it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So it 's a bloated iPod Touch .
That 's it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it's a bloated iPod Touch.
That's it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925560</id>
	<title>Re:Typical techies and gadget freaks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264589700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's supposed to be innovative about the software?  It's exactly the same as an iPhone.  "Doing the same thing on a slightly bigger screen" is not innovation.</p><p>Maybe next time round Apple will come up with some really innovative ideas, like multitasking, or some kind of clever interface where multiple applications can be displayed at once by dividing the screen into "windows".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's supposed to be innovative about the software ?
It 's exactly the same as an iPhone .
" Doing the same thing on a slightly bigger screen " is not innovation.Maybe next time round Apple will come up with some really innovative ideas , like multitasking , or some kind of clever interface where multiple applications can be displayed at once by dividing the screen into " windows " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's supposed to be innovative about the software?
It's exactly the same as an iPhone.
"Doing the same thing on a slightly bigger screen" is not innovation.Maybe next time round Apple will come up with some really innovative ideas, like multitasking, or some kind of clever interface where multiple applications can be displayed at once by dividing the screen into "windows".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931936</id>
	<title>Re:Why would I buy an iPad</title>
	<author>Aceticon</author>
	<datestamp>1264686060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your original assumptions are wrong and I'm afraid you just spent 100 lines of comment fighting Windmills, not Giants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your original assumptions are wrong and I 'm afraid you just spent 100 lines of comment fighting Windmills , not Giants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your original assumptions are wrong and I'm afraid you just spent 100 lines of comment fighting Windmills, not Giants.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921522</id>
	<title>Re:No WCMDA/HSPA or even CDMA/EVDO is a huge miss</title>
	<author>mdm-adph</author>
	<datestamp>1264622460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just buy a <a href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/mobilebroadband/?page=products\_mifi" title="verizonwireless.com">Verizon mifi</a> [verizonwireless.com] and tape the fucking thing to the back, jesus christ.  It's big enough.</p><p>Problem solved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just buy a Verizon mifi [ verizonwireless.com ] and tape the fucking thing to the back , jesus christ .
It 's big enough.Problem solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just buy a Verizon mifi [verizonwireless.com] and tape the fucking thing to the back, jesus christ.
It's big enough.Problem solved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923284</id>
	<title>Re:Like him or loath him</title>
	<author>Darth Snowshoe</author>
	<datestamp>1264583220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple will sell many millions of these things.   This thing is basically a hybrid between every other media-related thing you like, in a form factor that is exactly in the sweet spot of convenience and usability.   The pricing alone is an indication that they intend to take over the world with this - the profit margin has got to be awfully thin.  They intend to kill several other categories of device (say goodbye, Kindle, Garmin, Palm, hand-held DVD players) with this one.  The form factor is durable - they're not going to shrink this any more, only continue to pack more and more features into the same carapace for the foreseeable future. Your grandchildren will be carrying around something that looks a lot like this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple will sell many millions of these things .
This thing is basically a hybrid between every other media-related thing you like , in a form factor that is exactly in the sweet spot of convenience and usability .
The pricing alone is an indication that they intend to take over the world with this - the profit margin has got to be awfully thin .
They intend to kill several other categories of device ( say goodbye , Kindle , Garmin , Palm , hand-held DVD players ) with this one .
The form factor is durable - they 're not going to shrink this any more , only continue to pack more and more features into the same carapace for the foreseeable future .
Your grandchildren will be carrying around something that looks a lot like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple will sell many millions of these things.
This thing is basically a hybrid between every other media-related thing you like, in a form factor that is exactly in the sweet spot of convenience and usability.
The pricing alone is an indication that they intend to take over the world with this - the profit margin has got to be awfully thin.
They intend to kill several other categories of device (say goodbye, Kindle, Garmin, Palm, hand-held DVD players) with this one.
The form factor is durable - they're not going to shrink this any more, only continue to pack more and more features into the same carapace for the foreseeable future.
Your grandchildren will be carrying around something that looks a lot like this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922628</id>
	<title>Re:iPad? Really?</title>
	<author>garg0yle</author>
	<datestamp>1264624860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They start at $499, and even the top-end model (64Gb and 3G wireless) is under a grand.  US funds, of course.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They start at $ 499 , and even the top-end model ( 64Gb and 3G wireless ) is under a grand .
US funds , of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They start at $499, and even the top-end model (64Gb and 3G wireless) is under a grand.
US funds, of course.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922600</id>
	<title>Re:So far some interesting points</title>
	<author>Nukenbar</author>
	<datestamp>1264624800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What will be interesting with the epub format is whether or not they will allow you to use epub books that don't have whatever DRM that they will put on the epub files.</p><p>This was something that they couldn't do with MP3 files on the iPod because everyone already had a collection of MP3.  But they may rightly or wrongly believe that they can create a DRM only library of books, similar to the APP store.  This would lock people out of using the vast librabry of epub files that already exist on the internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What will be interesting with the epub format is whether or not they will allow you to use epub books that do n't have whatever DRM that they will put on the epub files.This was something that they could n't do with MP3 files on the iPod because everyone already had a collection of MP3 .
But they may rightly or wrongly believe that they can create a DRM only library of books , similar to the APP store .
This would lock people out of using the vast librabry of epub files that already exist on the internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What will be interesting with the epub format is whether or not they will allow you to use epub books that don't have whatever DRM that they will put on the epub files.This was something that they couldn't do with MP3 files on the iPod because everyone already had a collection of MP3.
But they may rightly or wrongly believe that they can create a DRM only library of books, similar to the APP store.
This would lock people out of using the vast librabry of epub files that already exist on the internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30934144</id>
	<title>Camera</title>
	<author>Nukenbar</author>
	<datestamp>1264697520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This could have been a great skype video phone with a built-in camera on the front.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This could have been a great skype video phone with a built-in camera on the front .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This could have been a great skype video phone with a built-in camera on the front.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931010</id>
	<title>Re:Typical techies and gadget freaks</title>
	<author>SoupIsGoodFood\_42</author>
	<datestamp>1264673940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You say that like it's a bad thing. The iPhone is pretty successful, if you hadn't noticed. Many people like the interface because of it's simplicity. Ball's back in your court, I'm afraid.</p><p>Besides, it's more than just a giant iPhone. All the default apps have be redesigned to suit the larger display. It's right there if you watch the video, or visit their site.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You say that like it 's a bad thing .
The iPhone is pretty successful , if you had n't noticed .
Many people like the interface because of it 's simplicity .
Ball 's back in your court , I 'm afraid.Besides , it 's more than just a giant iPhone .
All the default apps have be redesigned to suit the larger display .
It 's right there if you watch the video , or visit their site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You say that like it's a bad thing.
The iPhone is pretty successful, if you hadn't noticed.
Many people like the interface because of it's simplicity.
Ball's back in your court, I'm afraid.Besides, it's more than just a giant iPhone.
All the default apps have be redesigned to suit the larger display.
It's right there if you watch the video, or visit their site.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925848</id>
	<title>stylus</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264590480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A tablet needs a stylus and handwriting recognition.</p><p>Why is it that 10 years ago Apple Newton came out with the best handwriting recognition ever and no device since has even come clost to matching the Apple Newton? the iPad has missed an oppertunity to be a realy useful business/study tool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A tablet needs a stylus and handwriting recognition.Why is it that 10 years ago Apple Newton came out with the best handwriting recognition ever and no device since has even come clost to matching the Apple Newton ?
the iPad has missed an oppertunity to be a realy useful business/study tool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A tablet needs a stylus and handwriting recognition.Why is it that 10 years ago Apple Newton came out with the best handwriting recognition ever and no device since has even come clost to matching the Apple Newton?
the iPad has missed an oppertunity to be a realy useful business/study tool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924102</id>
	<title>Re:No flash support</title>
	<author>cheesybagel</author>
	<datestamp>1264585380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually Crunchyroll has some iPhone app as well (alpha). Still, yeah, Flash support is interesting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually Crunchyroll has some iPhone app as well ( alpha ) .
Still , yeah , Flash support is interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually Crunchyroll has some iPhone app as well (alpha).
Still, yeah, Flash support is interesting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924128</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264585440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dream on.. It uses the same OS as the Iphone and Ipod.  It's already been confirmed there is <b>NO MULTITASKING</b> in this device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dream on.. It uses the same OS as the Iphone and Ipod .
It 's already been confirmed there is NO MULTITASKING in this device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dream on.. It uses the same OS as the Iphone and Ipod.
It's already been confirmed there is NO MULTITASKING in this device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921868</id>
	<title>Apple needs a new prod to put all these iProducts</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264623240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just like MadTV said they need an iRack.<br>Yes, but like this unveiling show of the iPad the iRack is mismanaged and looks like it was put together with no direction what-so-ever.</p><p>Neverthless, let's not focus anymore time on the iRack and now focus all our attention on the new Apple sneaker product the iRan. I hear it's the hottest item out there on the market; so hot it's nuclear!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just like MadTV said they need an iRack.Yes , but like this unveiling show of the iPad the iRack is mismanaged and looks like it was put together with no direction what-so-ever.Neverthless , let 's not focus anymore time on the iRack and now focus all our attention on the new Apple sneaker product the iRan .
I hear it 's the hottest item out there on the market ; so hot it 's nuclear !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just like MadTV said they need an iRack.Yes, but like this unveiling show of the iPad the iRack is mismanaged and looks like it was put together with no direction what-so-ever.Neverthless, let's not focus anymore time on the iRack and now focus all our attention on the new Apple sneaker product the iRan.
I hear it's the hottest item out there on the market; so hot it's nuclear!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_237</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_283</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_162</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_245</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_293</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_203</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_172</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926658
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_255</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_213</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_199</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_185</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_143</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_226</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_272</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_193</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_151</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_234</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_129</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_282</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_161</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_258</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_148</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_269</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_244</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_290</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_202</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925554
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_134</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_180</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30932158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_279</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_266</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30942998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_158</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_277</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_210</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_221</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_156</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_190</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_285</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_231</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_164</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923892
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_295</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_253</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_205</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_174</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30932452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_132</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_137</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_215</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_261</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_268</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_147</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921512
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30958968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_145</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_169</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_274</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_220</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_153</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_298</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_177</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_284</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30930128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_242</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_163</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_188</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_171</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_218</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_229</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_292</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_250</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_204</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_198</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_182</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_140</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_239</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_223</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_260</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_212</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_271</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30930142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30943046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_192</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_150</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_247</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_233</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_126</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_257</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_139</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_187</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_263</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_228</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_149</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_195</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_181</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_236</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_222</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30934122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_246</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_179</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_136</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_252</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_131</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_142</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_287</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_262</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_273</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_166</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30930552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30961766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_152</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921922
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_249</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_297</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_176</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_207</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_128</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_281</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30932530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_160</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_259</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_217</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_291</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_209</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_201</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_170</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_189</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_219</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_211</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_276</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_197</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_155</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_141</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_238</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_286</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_165</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_270</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_248</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_294</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_173</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_206</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_280</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_127</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_138</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_184</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922578
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_256</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_267</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_214</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_225</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_146</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_200</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_194</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_289</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_235</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_168</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_299</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_243</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_178</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30936510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_241</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_265</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_251</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_130</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_135</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30940026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_183</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_278</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_159</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_224</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_157</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_191</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_288</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_232</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_167</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_230</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30930764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_240</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_296</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30932990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_175</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_208</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_254</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_186</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_133</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_144</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_227</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_264</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_216</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_275</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922140
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_196</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_154</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929140
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1849207_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926022
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922502
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924224
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926104
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30934122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923668
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923714
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922644
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921876
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922938
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921638
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927384
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925766
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927208
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30930552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30961766
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927874
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921850
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926580
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921808
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925418
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925494
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927050
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926574
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929128
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931010
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927322
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931204
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30930128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927076
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923100
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921740
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921450
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921212
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923184
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922478
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931742
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924120
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924840
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924356
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929052
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30932990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922904
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30932158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923534
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30940026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929322
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921964
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923800
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922866
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929286
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922928
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926800
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924410
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929362
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928584
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924494
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928438
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923992
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921872
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921490
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924932
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926888
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922574
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926098
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921354
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921390
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922114
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925360
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926658
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923556
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926240
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30932452
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925402
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921728
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922576
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925554
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921922
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921830
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922034
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924992
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926808
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931616
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30930764
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926632
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921778
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927736
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927642
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926198
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921742
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924136
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925304
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922826
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923960
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924572
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927074
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921826
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921704
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921378
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30936510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30958968
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923080
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921864
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921902
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922606
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922912
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922764
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921538
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927734
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921506
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929140
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921580
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922058
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924200
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926670
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928300
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921882
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924882
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30942998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924998
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30930142
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30943046
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922424
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923416
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921352
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921878
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927574
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925188
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923674
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923936
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922518
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926072
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927830
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922868
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921376
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921812
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924496
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927060
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924080
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927990
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928872
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925036
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931588
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922722
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924086
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921960
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923948
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923052
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922190
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927466
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923448
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926846
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928884
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931158
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924638
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923892
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923338
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923806
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922652
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922468
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924102
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923956
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924602
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926076
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923970
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921386
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30932530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923590
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924836
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921950
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923586
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921364
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922168
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922394
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921816
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921208
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1849207.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921756
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924004
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925674
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30927894
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925290
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30931288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921866
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925272
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925702
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928420
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923904
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922198
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925432
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925146
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926930
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926078
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30924762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921410
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30929956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30925520
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30926924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30921956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30928842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30923208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1849207.30922514
</commentlist>
</conversation>
