<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_26_145223</id>
	<title>Universe Closer To Heat Death Than Once Thought</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1264516620000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>TapeCutter writes <i>"In <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.3983">a paper soon to be published</a> (PDF) in the <em>Astrophysical Journal</em>, Australian researchers have estimated the entropy of the universe is <a href="http://www.itwire.com/content/view/30722/1066/">about 30 times higher than previous estimates</a>.  According to their research, super-massive black holes 'are the largest contributor to the entropy of the observable universe, contributing at least an order of magnitude more entropy than previously estimated.' For those of us who like their science in the form of a car analogy, Dr. Lineweaver compared their results to a car's gas tank. He states, 'It's a bit like looking at your gas gauge and saying "I thought I had half a gas tank, but I only have a quarter of a tank."'"</i>
Fortunately, that quarter of a tank will still get us as far as we need to go and then some.</htmltext>
<tokenext>TapeCutter writes " In a paper soon to be published ( PDF ) in the Astrophysical Journal , Australian researchers have estimated the entropy of the universe is about 30 times higher than previous estimates .
According to their research , super-massive black holes 'are the largest contributor to the entropy of the observable universe , contributing at least an order of magnitude more entropy than previously estimated .
' For those of us who like their science in the form of a car analogy , Dr. Lineweaver compared their results to a car 's gas tank .
He states , 'It 's a bit like looking at your gas gauge and saying " I thought I had half a gas tank , but I only have a quarter of a tank .
" ' " Fortunately , that quarter of a tank will still get us as far as we need to go and then some .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TapeCutter writes "In a paper soon to be published (PDF) in the Astrophysical Journal, Australian researchers have estimated the entropy of the universe is about 30 times higher than previous estimates.
According to their research, super-massive black holes 'are the largest contributor to the entropy of the observable universe, contributing at least an order of magnitude more entropy than previously estimated.
' For those of us who like their science in the form of a car analogy, Dr. Lineweaver compared their results to a car's gas tank.
He states, 'It's a bit like looking at your gas gauge and saying "I thought I had half a gas tank, but I only have a quarter of a tank.
"'"
Fortunately, that quarter of a tank will still get us as far as we need to go and then some.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906724</id>
	<title>Re:two possible futures now cut shorter....</title>
	<author>Limburgher</author>
	<datestamp>1264530240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Moot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Moot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Moot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904892</id>
	<title>Inflation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264523340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the difference between a quarter and half of a tank is "An order of magnitude"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the difference between a quarter and half of a tank is " An order of magnitude " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the difference between a quarter and half of a tank is "An order of magnitude"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904692</id>
	<title>Re:two possible futures now cut shorter....</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1264522560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We'll just adapt.</p><p>I mean time goes slower when you're closer to a black hole, amiright?</p><p>(in theory)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 'll just adapt.I mean time goes slower when you 're closer to a black hole , amiright ?
( in theory )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We'll just adapt.I mean time goes slower when you're closer to a black hole, amiright?
(in theory)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905822</id>
	<title>It's not the heat...</title>
	<author>xactuary</author>
	<datestamp>1264526760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's the humidity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the humidity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the humidity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905304</id>
	<title>heat death</title>
	<author>astar</author>
	<datestamp>1264524960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I liked the post above a lot.</p><p>Heat death arguments are all about the laws of thermodynamics and there are probably three good criticisms.</p><p>the experimental basis last i looked was some system in equillibrium with a container around it and instrumentation outside the container.  so in the heat death argument there is an implication that the universe is in equillibrium and the idea of a container and an observer outside the universe is a meaniful concept.  To be clear, I am not particularly looking here at something simple like feasibility.  I am fine with thought experiments up to a point.</p><p>there is a parallel assumption, very deep in the usual science and a lot of math, that the universe is a machine.</p><p>emperically, thermodynamics is fundamentally wrong.  consider events around the end of the 19th century.  thermodynamics was around.  the equations were established. in fact, there was, based on a flakey idea that physics was finite, the thought that we knew everything.  There were a few unimportant oddities.  One of them was radioactivity.  so the thermo equations on the blackboard got rewritten.  right at that point, thermodynamics did not hold.  so what does this say about the fundamental nature of the universe?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I liked the post above a lot.Heat death arguments are all about the laws of thermodynamics and there are probably three good criticisms.the experimental basis last i looked was some system in equillibrium with a container around it and instrumentation outside the container .
so in the heat death argument there is an implication that the universe is in equillibrium and the idea of a container and an observer outside the universe is a meaniful concept .
To be clear , I am not particularly looking here at something simple like feasibility .
I am fine with thought experiments up to a point.there is a parallel assumption , very deep in the usual science and a lot of math , that the universe is a machine.emperically , thermodynamics is fundamentally wrong .
consider events around the end of the 19th century .
thermodynamics was around .
the equations were established .
in fact , there was , based on a flakey idea that physics was finite , the thought that we knew everything .
There were a few unimportant oddities .
One of them was radioactivity .
so the thermo equations on the blackboard got rewritten .
right at that point , thermodynamics did not hold .
so what does this say about the fundamental nature of the universe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I liked the post above a lot.Heat death arguments are all about the laws of thermodynamics and there are probably three good criticisms.the experimental basis last i looked was some system in equillibrium with a container around it and instrumentation outside the container.
so in the heat death argument there is an implication that the universe is in equillibrium and the idea of a container and an observer outside the universe is a meaniful concept.
To be clear, I am not particularly looking here at something simple like feasibility.
I am fine with thought experiments up to a point.there is a parallel assumption, very deep in the usual science and a lot of math, that the universe is a machine.emperically, thermodynamics is fundamentally wrong.
consider events around the end of the 19th century.
thermodynamics was around.
the equations were established.
in fact, there was, based on a flakey idea that physics was finite, the thought that we knew everything.
There were a few unimportant oddities.
One of them was radioactivity.
so the thermo equations on the blackboard got rewritten.
right at that point, thermodynamics did not hold.
so what does this say about the fundamental nature of the universe?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904144</id>
	<title>My gas tank has black holes in it too.</title>
	<author>DiscountBorg(TM)</author>
	<datestamp>1264520760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I should really get that fixed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I should really get that fixed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I should really get that fixed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906704</id>
	<title>Re:heat death</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1264530120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>emperically, thermodynamics is fundamentally wrong. </i></p><p>Why do people say dumb shit like this?  There's probably nothing more empirically <i>right</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>emperically , thermodynamics is fundamentally wrong .
Why do people say dumb shit like this ?
There 's probably nothing more empirically right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>emperically, thermodynamics is fundamentally wrong.
Why do people say dumb shit like this?
There's probably nothing more empirically right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904826</id>
	<title>Deep Space 9</title>
	<author>Kirin Fenrir</author>
	<datestamp>1264523100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jack: "The fact is that the universe is going to stop expanding and it is going to collapse in on itself. We've got to do something before it's too late!"<br> <br>
Patrick: "How much time do we have left?"<br> <br>
Jack: "Sixty trillion years, seventy at the most."<br> <br>
Patrick: "Oh, no."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jack : " The fact is that the universe is going to stop expanding and it is going to collapse in on itself .
We 've got to do something before it 's too late !
" Patrick : " How much time do we have left ?
" Jack : " Sixty trillion years , seventy at the most .
" Patrick : " Oh , no .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jack: "The fact is that the universe is going to stop expanding and it is going to collapse in on itself.
We've got to do something before it's too late!
" 
Patrick: "How much time do we have left?
" 
Jack: "Sixty trillion years, seventy at the most.
" 
Patrick: "Oh, no.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30909396</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264498380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally science agrees. The end is near!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally science agrees .
The end is near !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally science agrees.
The end is near!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904594</id>
	<title>Re:OMG!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264522200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Peak universe happened at the big bang, its all been down hill from there... reminds me of a marriage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Peak universe happened at the big bang , its all been down hill from there... reminds me of a marriage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Peak universe happened at the big bang, its all been down hill from there... reminds me of a marriage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905926</id>
	<title>Re:two possible futures now cut shorter....</title>
	<author>Tolkien</author>
	<datestamp>1264527180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>but all mute if Big Rip is possible, we might only have 22 billion years left!:</p></div><p>Moot. M-O-O-T.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but all mute if Big Rip is possible , we might only have 22 billion years left ! : Moot .
M-O-O-T .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but all mute if Big Rip is possible, we might only have 22 billion years left!:Moot.
M-O-O-T.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904448</id>
	<title>Oh no! Call Diane Duane!</title>
	<author>JoshuaZ</author>
	<datestamp>1264521720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Lone Power must be closer to winning than we thought. We need Nita and Kit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Lone Power must be closer to winning than we thought .
We need Nita and Kit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Lone Power must be closer to winning than we thought.
We need Nita and Kit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906466</id>
	<title>Re:Not so sure...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264529160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;Linux fembots with a penchant for evil, damnit!</p><p>Stormy is at GNOME and she's going to help deliver that free desktop so that its dependant to Microsoft<br>technology.<br>Cant get more evil than that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Linux fembots with a penchant for evil , damnit ! Stormy is at GNOME and she 's going to help deliver that free desktop so that its dependant to Microsofttechnology.Cant get more evil than that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Linux fembots with a penchant for evil, damnit!Stormy is at GNOME and she's going to help deliver that free desktop so that its dependant to Microsofttechnology.Cant get more evil than that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905012</id>
	<title>Re:Entropy increasing, Slashdot-style</title>
	<author>tolan-b</author>
	<datestamp>1264523880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>4     .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>4 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4     .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906306</id>
	<title>Re:Entropy increasing, Slashdot-style</title>
	<author>mister\_playboy</author>
	<datestamp>1264528620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice link, thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice link , thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice link, thanks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904798</id>
	<title>Facts not in eviedence</title>
	<author>Rockoon</author>
	<datestamp>1264522980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Singularities are not a requirement of black holes. Until about 25 years ago, the entire universe was theorized to maybe have the critical density necessary to be a black hole itself (with an inevitable "big crunch" producing a singularity in the very distance future), and obviously the universe isnt a singularity right now.<br>
<br>
Black holes can contain lots of usable energy, for those that might be in the black holes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Singularities are not a requirement of black holes .
Until about 25 years ago , the entire universe was theorized to maybe have the critical density necessary to be a black hole itself ( with an inevitable " big crunch " producing a singularity in the very distance future ) , and obviously the universe isnt a singularity right now .
Black holes can contain lots of usable energy , for those that might be in the black holes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Singularities are not a requirement of black holes.
Until about 25 years ago, the entire universe was theorized to maybe have the critical density necessary to be a black hole itself (with an inevitable "big crunch" producing a singularity in the very distance future), and obviously the universe isnt a singularity right now.
Black holes can contain lots of usable energy, for those that might be in the black holes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904424</id>
	<title>Re:As far as we need to go?</title>
	<author>ThePlague</author>
	<datestamp>1264521600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Restaurant at the End of the Universe, of course.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Restaurant at the End of the Universe , of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Restaurant at the End of the Universe, of course.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905342</id>
	<title>Re:Not so sure...</title>
	<author>DigiShaman</author>
	<datestamp>1264525080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Besides, the universe had damned well better not die - at least not until I get my flying car, copy of Duke Nuken' Forever (running on HURD), and an army of Linux fembots with a penchant for evil, damnit!</p></div> </blockquote><p>Jump into a singularity, then you can have it all!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Besides , the universe had damned well better not die - at least not until I get my flying car , copy of Duke Nuken ' Forever ( running on HURD ) , and an army of Linux fembots with a penchant for evil , damnit !
Jump into a singularity , then you can have it all !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Besides, the universe had damned well better not die - at least not until I get my flying car, copy of Duke Nuken' Forever (running on HURD), and an army of Linux fembots with a penchant for evil, damnit!
Jump into a singularity, then you can have it all!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906046</id>
	<title>Re:Does it bother anyone else</title>
	<author>Beer is good</author>
	<datestamp>1264527600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, it does.  He's out of the club.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , it does .
He 's out of the club .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, it does.
He's out of the club.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904274</id>
	<title>Does it bother anyone else</title>
	<author>plover</author>
	<datestamp>1264521180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it bother anyone else that a guy named "Lineweaver" is making a car analogy that <i>doesn't</i> involve alcohol?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it bother anyone else that a guy named " Lineweaver " is making a car analogy that does n't involve alcohol ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it bother anyone else that a guy named "Lineweaver" is making a car analogy that doesn't involve alcohol?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906564</id>
	<title>Re:Entropy increasing, Slashdot-style</title>
	<author>sconeu</author>
	<datestamp>1264529520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mod parent +1, Multivac</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod parent + 1 , Multivac</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod parent +1, Multivac</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906976</id>
	<title>As my professor said...</title>
	<author>Uranium-238</author>
	<datestamp>1264531320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>we're all going to end up as cosmic farts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>we 're all going to end up as cosmic farts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we're all going to end up as cosmic farts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904386</id>
	<title>Re:Entropy increasing, Slashdot-style</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264521480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't help that TFA is spread over multiple pages either...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't help that TFA is spread over multiple pages either.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't help that TFA is spread over multiple pages either...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30909524</id>
	<title>Pizza Analogy Guy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264498920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's like thinking you had an entire pizza in the fridge, but finding out you only had half.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like thinking you had an entire pizza in the fridge , but finding out you only had half .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like thinking you had an entire pizza in the fridge, but finding out you only had half.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30910758</id>
	<title>Re:As far as we need to go?</title>
	<author>dwye</author>
	<datestamp>1264504020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; And where is it that we're going?<p>

Why, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big\_Rip/" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big\_Rip/</a> [wikipedia.org], of course.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; And where is it that we 're going ?
Why , http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big \ _Rip/ [ wikipedia.org ] , of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; And where is it that we're going?
Why, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big\_Rip/ [wikipedia.org], of course.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30909880</id>
	<title>Re:Oh noes!</title>
	<author>ichigo 2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1264500360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>- seeing a computer which can run Crysis?</p></div></blockquote><p> <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3679&amp;p=8" title="anandtech.com">Ahem.</a> [anandtech.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>- seeing a computer which can run Crysis ?
Ahem. [ anandtech.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- seeing a computer which can run Crysis?
Ahem. [anandtech.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907902</id>
	<title>Re:two possible futures now cut shorter....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264535160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not for the person going into the black hole, sorry.</p><p>It's only for the person way outside of the black hole that keeps seeing a ever fading image of their buddy who fell in as ever fewer photos that left him trickle away in fewer and fewer numbers forever.</p><p>In another contradiction between the universe of gravity and the universe of light (relativity) the person has actually fallen over the event horizon, light just doesn't show you that because each photon is coming out slower and slower as it was emitted closer and closer to the edge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not for the person going into the black hole , sorry.It 's only for the person way outside of the black hole that keeps seeing a ever fading image of their buddy who fell in as ever fewer photos that left him trickle away in fewer and fewer numbers forever.In another contradiction between the universe of gravity and the universe of light ( relativity ) the person has actually fallen over the event horizon , light just does n't show you that because each photon is coming out slower and slower as it was emitted closer and closer to the edge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not for the person going into the black hole, sorry.It's only for the person way outside of the black hole that keeps seeing a ever fading image of their buddy who fell in as ever fewer photos that left him trickle away in fewer and fewer numbers forever.In another contradiction between the universe of gravity and the universe of light (relativity) the person has actually fallen over the event horizon, light just doesn't show you that because each photon is coming out slower and slower as it was emitted closer and closer to the edge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908356</id>
	<title>Re:two possible futures now cut shorter....</title>
	<author>GargamelSpaceman</author>
	<datestamp>1264536780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Big rip.  Huh huh huh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Big rip .
Huh huh huh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Big rip.
Huh huh huh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904530</id>
	<title>Should be in "idle" ?</title>
	<author>VShael</author>
	<datestamp>1264522020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a few problems with this post.<br>1) It's a dupe.<br>2) The article it refers to hasn't been published/peer reviewed yet.<br>3) Finding out we have 350 quadrillion years to go instead of 700 quadrillion years, is utterly meaningless at this point, since estimates that far wide and ranging will doubtless change a LOT in the X million years it will be before it becomes even remotely meaningful to human science.</p><p>Our ignorance about super massive black holes, and the number of them in the universe, already set the error bars on any estimate far too wide for it to be meaningful to even talk about it.</p><p>I haven't been this non-excited since they moved the estimates of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham's\_number" title="wikipedia.org">Graham's Number</a> [wikipedia.org] from   6 &lt; N* &lt; N to 11 &lt; N* &lt; N.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a few problems with this post.1 ) It 's a dupe.2 ) The article it refers to has n't been published/peer reviewed yet.3 ) Finding out we have 350 quadrillion years to go instead of 700 quadrillion years , is utterly meaningless at this point , since estimates that far wide and ranging will doubtless change a LOT in the X million years it will be before it becomes even remotely meaningful to human science.Our ignorance about super massive black holes , and the number of them in the universe , already set the error bars on any estimate far too wide for it to be meaningful to even talk about it.I have n't been this non-excited since they moved the estimates of Graham 's Number [ wikipedia.org ] from 6</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a few problems with this post.1) It's a dupe.2) The article it refers to hasn't been published/peer reviewed yet.3) Finding out we have 350 quadrillion years to go instead of 700 quadrillion years, is utterly meaningless at this point, since estimates that far wide and ranging will doubtless change a LOT in the X million years it will be before it becomes even remotely meaningful to human science.Our ignorance about super massive black holes, and the number of them in the universe, already set the error bars on any estimate far too wide for it to be meaningful to even talk about it.I haven't been this non-excited since they moved the estimates of Graham's Number [wikipedia.org] from   6 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904152</id>
	<title>Singularity</title>
	<author>Lord Lode</author>
	<datestamp>1264520760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah well, in a few decades we'll have the technological singularity and the entity resulting of that will be so smart that not only it'll exist out of the entire universe, but it'll also prevent its death or make sure its death will result in a new Big Bang!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah well , in a few decades we 'll have the technological singularity and the entity resulting of that will be so smart that not only it 'll exist out of the entire universe , but it 'll also prevent its death or make sure its death will result in a new Big Bang !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah well, in a few decades we'll have the technological singularity and the entity resulting of that will be so smart that not only it'll exist out of the entire universe, but it'll also prevent its death or make sure its death will result in a new Big Bang!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906102</id>
	<title>You down with entropy? Yeah, you know me!</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1264527840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Trash Talk<br>Harm me with harmony.<br>Doomsday, drop a load on 'em.</p><p>Verse 1<br>Entropy, how can I explain it? I'll take it frame by frame it,<br>to have you all jumping, shouting saying it.<br>Let's just say that it's a measure of disorder,<br>in a system that is closed, like with a border.<br>It's sorta, like a, well a measurement of randomness,<br>proposed in 1850 by a German, but wait I digress.<br>"What the fuck is entropy?", I here the people still exclaiming,<br>it seems I gotta start the explaining.</p><p>You ever drop an egg and on the floor you see it break?<br>You go and get a mop so you can clean up your mistake.<br>But did you ever stop to ponder why we know it's true,<br>if you drop a broken egg you will not get an egg that's new.</p><p>That's entropy or E-N-T-R-O to the P to the Y,<br>the reason why the sun will one day all burn out and die.<br>Order from disorder is a scientific rarity,<br>allow me to explain it with a little bit more clarity.<br>Did I say rarity? I meant impossibility,<br>at least in a closed system there will always be more entropy.<br>That's entropy and I hope that you're all down with it,<br>if you are here's your membership.</p><p>Chorus<br>You down with entropy?<br>Yeah, you know me! (x3)<br>Who's down with entropy?<br>Every last homey!</p><p>Verse 2<br>Defining entropy as disorder's not complete,<br>'cause disorder as a definition doesn't cover heat.<br>So my first definition I would now like to withdraw,<br>and offer one that fits thermodynamics second law.<br>First we need to understand that entropy is energy,<br>energy that can't be used to state it more specifically.<br>In a closed system entropy always goes up,<br>that's the second law, now you know what's up.</p><p>You can't win, you can't break even, you can't leave the game,<br>'cause entropy will take it all 'though it seems a shame.<br>The second law, as we now know, is quite clear to state,<br>that entropy must increase and not dissipate.</p><p>Creationists always try to use the second law,<br>to disprove evolution, but their theory has a flaw.<br>The second law is quite precise about where it applies,<br>only in a closed system must the entropy count rise.<br>The earth's not a closed system' it's powered by the sun,<br>so fuck the damn creationists, Doomsday get my gun!<br>That, in a nutshell, is what entropy's about,<br>you're now down with a discount.</p><p>Chorus</p><p>Trash Talk<br>Hit it!<br>Doomsday, kick it in!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Trash TalkHarm me with harmony.Doomsday , drop a load on 'em.Verse 1Entropy , how can I explain it ?
I 'll take it frame by frame it,to have you all jumping , shouting saying it.Let 's just say that it 's a measure of disorder,in a system that is closed , like with a border.It 's sorta , like a , well a measurement of randomness,proposed in 1850 by a German , but wait I digress .
" What the fuck is entropy ?
" , I here the people still exclaiming,it seems I got ta start the explaining.You ever drop an egg and on the floor you see it break ? You go and get a mop so you can clean up your mistake.But did you ever stop to ponder why we know it 's true,if you drop a broken egg you will not get an egg that 's new.That 's entropy or E-N-T-R-O to the P to the Y,the reason why the sun will one day all burn out and die.Order from disorder is a scientific rarity,allow me to explain it with a little bit more clarity.Did I say rarity ?
I meant impossibility,at least in a closed system there will always be more entropy.That 's entropy and I hope that you 're all down with it,if you are here 's your membership.ChorusYou down with entropy ? Yeah , you know me !
( x3 ) Who 's down with entropy ? Every last homey ! Verse 2Defining entropy as disorder 's not complete,'cause disorder as a definition does n't cover heat.So my first definition I would now like to withdraw,and offer one that fits thermodynamics second law.First we need to understand that entropy is energy,energy that ca n't be used to state it more specifically.In a closed system entropy always goes up,that 's the second law , now you know what 's up.You ca n't win , you ca n't break even , you ca n't leave the game,'cause entropy will take it all 'though it seems a shame.The second law , as we now know , is quite clear to state,that entropy must increase and not dissipate.Creationists always try to use the second law,to disprove evolution , but their theory has a flaw.The second law is quite precise about where it applies,only in a closed system must the entropy count rise.The earth 's not a closed system ' it 's powered by the sun,so fuck the damn creationists , Doomsday get my gun ! That , in a nutshell , is what entropy 's about,you 're now down with a discount.ChorusTrash TalkHit it ! Doomsday , kick it in !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trash TalkHarm me with harmony.Doomsday, drop a load on 'em.Verse 1Entropy, how can I explain it?
I'll take it frame by frame it,to have you all jumping, shouting saying it.Let's just say that it's a measure of disorder,in a system that is closed, like with a border.It's sorta, like a, well a measurement of randomness,proposed in 1850 by a German, but wait I digress.
"What the fuck is entropy?
", I here the people still exclaiming,it seems I gotta start the explaining.You ever drop an egg and on the floor you see it break?You go and get a mop so you can clean up your mistake.But did you ever stop to ponder why we know it's true,if you drop a broken egg you will not get an egg that's new.That's entropy or E-N-T-R-O to the P to the Y,the reason why the sun will one day all burn out and die.Order from disorder is a scientific rarity,allow me to explain it with a little bit more clarity.Did I say rarity?
I meant impossibility,at least in a closed system there will always be more entropy.That's entropy and I hope that you're all down with it,if you are here's your membership.ChorusYou down with entropy?Yeah, you know me!
(x3)Who's down with entropy?Every last homey!Verse 2Defining entropy as disorder's not complete,'cause disorder as a definition doesn't cover heat.So my first definition I would now like to withdraw,and offer one that fits thermodynamics second law.First we need to understand that entropy is energy,energy that can't be used to state it more specifically.In a closed system entropy always goes up,that's the second law, now you know what's up.You can't win, you can't break even, you can't leave the game,'cause entropy will take it all 'though it seems a shame.The second law, as we now know, is quite clear to state,that entropy must increase and not dissipate.Creationists always try to use the second law,to disprove evolution, but their theory has a flaw.The second law is quite precise about where it applies,only in a closed system must the entropy count rise.The earth's not a closed system' it's powered by the sun,so fuck the damn creationists, Doomsday get my gun!That, in a nutshell, is what entropy's about,you're now down with a discount.ChorusTrash TalkHit it!Doomsday, kick it in!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30913486</id>
	<title>Re:two possible futures now cut shorter....</title>
	<author>rubycodez</author>
	<datestamp>1264526160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and besides what the other persons replied, not only would you fall in quickly from your point of view as black hole fodder, you'd be drawn out thinner than a spaghetti noodle by tidal forces long before you reached the event horizon.  Like a good whore, black holes not only suck, they pull and squeeze with vigor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and besides what the other persons replied , not only would you fall in quickly from your point of view as black hole fodder , you 'd be drawn out thinner than a spaghetti noodle by tidal forces long before you reached the event horizon .
Like a good whore , black holes not only suck , they pull and squeeze with vigor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and besides what the other persons replied, not only would you fall in quickly from your point of view as black hole fodder, you'd be drawn out thinner than a spaghetti noodle by tidal forces long before you reached the event horizon.
Like a good whore, black holes not only suck, they pull and squeeze with vigor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30909600</id>
	<title>Car analogy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264499160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>To refine the car analogy, suppose you're driving from New York to Boston (350 km). Before this article, you thought you had 500 trillion liters of petrol. After, you only have 250 trillion. Will you still make it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>To refine the car analogy , suppose you 're driving from New York to Boston ( 350 km ) .
Before this article , you thought you had 500 trillion liters of petrol .
After , you only have 250 trillion .
Will you still make it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To refine the car analogy, suppose you're driving from New York to Boston (350 km).
Before this article, you thought you had 500 trillion liters of petrol.
After, you only have 250 trillion.
Will you still make it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30914418</id>
	<title>Everybody stop typing!</title>
	<author>KingTank</author>
	<datestamp>1264624140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shhhhh... you're making entropy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Shhhhh... you 're making entropy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shhhhh... you're making entropy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30910524</id>
	<title>Re:Any reason at all for matter, or energy?</title>
	<author>KDR\_11k</author>
	<datestamp>1264503000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't look like we'll be able to answer that (except for making up random bullshit and calling it the truth) since the big bang wiped out all data of what was before, if there even was anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't look like we 'll be able to answer that ( except for making up random bullshit and calling it the truth ) since the big bang wiped out all data of what was before , if there even was anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't look like we'll be able to answer that (except for making up random bullshit and calling it the truth) since the big bang wiped out all data of what was before, if there even was anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904310</id>
	<title>Oh noes!</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1264521300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>You mean we may <i>never</i> make it to:<br> <br>- seeing a computer which can run Crysis?<br>- Duke Nukem: Forever release date?<br>- Hurd 1.0?<br>- kdawson leaving a story alone and publishing something accurate?<br> <br>:-O</htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean we may never make it to : - seeing a computer which can run Crysis ? - Duke Nukem : Forever release date ? - Hurd 1.0 ? - kdawson leaving a story alone and publishing something accurate ?
: -O</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean we may never make it to: - seeing a computer which can run Crysis?- Duke Nukem: Forever release date?- Hurd 1.0?- kdawson leaving a story alone and publishing something accurate?
:-O</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904142</id>
	<title>Not so sure...</title>
	<author>Penguinisto</author>
	<datestamp>1264520700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...given the not-quite-set-in-concrete nature of theoretical physics, string theory, and especially M-theory (...don't like this universe? we got more!), I don't think I'm going to sell the house and walk around in animal skins just yet.</p><p>(definitely not saying that entropy itself doesn't exist - that much has been proven. OTOH, I suspect there's a whole lot more going on out there/here/everywhere that we simply do not know about yet, eh?)</p><p>Besides, the universe had damned well better not die - at least not until I get my flying car, copy of Duke Nuken' Forever (running on HURD), and an army of Linux fembots with a penchant for evil, damnit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...given the not-quite-set-in-concrete nature of theoretical physics , string theory , and especially M-theory ( ...do n't like this universe ?
we got more !
) , I do n't think I 'm going to sell the house and walk around in animal skins just yet .
( definitely not saying that entropy itself does n't exist - that much has been proven .
OTOH , I suspect there 's a whole lot more going on out there/here/everywhere that we simply do not know about yet , eh ?
) Besides , the universe had damned well better not die - at least not until I get my flying car , copy of Duke Nuken ' Forever ( running on HURD ) , and an army of Linux fembots with a penchant for evil , damnit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...given the not-quite-set-in-concrete nature of theoretical physics, string theory, and especially M-theory (...don't like this universe?
we got more!
), I don't think I'm going to sell the house and walk around in animal skins just yet.
(definitely not saying that entropy itself doesn't exist - that much has been proven.
OTOH, I suspect there's a whole lot more going on out there/here/everywhere that we simply do not know about yet, eh?
)Besides, the universe had damned well better not die - at least not until I get my flying car, copy of Duke Nuken' Forever (running on HURD), and an army of Linux fembots with a penchant for evil, damnit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904592</id>
	<title>Re:Entropy increasing, Slashdot-style</title>
	<author>ryanvm</author>
	<datestamp>1264522200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER

<br>
<br>
[Grrr. Have to thwart the anti-caps filter. Thx Slashdot - Destroyer of Jokes.]</htmltext>
<tokenext>INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER [ Grrr .
Have to thwart the anti-caps filter .
Thx Slashdot - Destroyer of Jokes .
]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER



[Grrr.
Have to thwart the anti-caps filter.
Thx Slashdot - Destroyer of Jokes.
]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906208</id>
	<title>Re:OMG!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264528260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Death of The Universe?<br>I would not worry<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. until Netctaft says something on that matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Death of The Universe ? I would not worry .. until Netctaft says something on that matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Death of The Universe?I would not worry .. until Netctaft says something on that matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904846</id>
	<title>Re:As far as we need to go?</title>
	<author>Rhaban</author>
	<datestamp>1264523160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the apple tablet announcement tomorrow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the apple tablet announcement tomorrow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the apple tablet announcement tomorrow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904296</id>
	<title>Dupe</title>
	<author>MetalliQaZ</author>
	<datestamp>1264521240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure this was posted to already.</p><p><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/06/1641232/Universe-Has-100x-More-Entropy-Than-We-Thought" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/06/1641232/Universe-Has-100x-More-Entropy-Than-We-Thought</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>October 6th 2009</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure this was posted to already.http : //science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/06/1641232/Universe-Has-100x-More-Entropy-Than-We-Thought [ slashdot.org ] October 6th 2009</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure this was posted to already.http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/06/1641232/Universe-Has-100x-More-Entropy-Than-We-Thought [slashdot.org]October 6th 2009</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905472</id>
	<title>So One Theory says to another...</title>
	<author>geekmux</author>
	<datestamp>1264525560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...but all mute if Big Rip is possible, we might only have 22 billion years left!</p></div><p>Er, from Big Bang to Big Rip?</p><p>Cue sexual innuendo and large space fart jokes in 3...2...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...but all mute if Big Rip is possible , we might only have 22 billion years left ! Er , from Big Bang to Big Rip ? Cue sexual innuendo and large space fart jokes in 3...2.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but all mute if Big Rip is possible, we might only have 22 billion years left!Er, from Big Bang to Big Rip?Cue sexual innuendo and large space fart jokes in 3...2...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907448</id>
	<title>Re:Singularity</title>
	<author>Smallpond</author>
	<datestamp>1264533360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Death is a misnomer. Physical processes will be different and much slower as entropy increases, but there is no hard limit which is ever reached.  In 30 billion years the descendants of humans might have a million year lifespan which seems to them to be the same length as ours does to us.  They just have less available free energy.  The beings that lived a few seconds after the big bang had whole civilizations which lasted microseconds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Death is a misnomer .
Physical processes will be different and much slower as entropy increases , but there is no hard limit which is ever reached .
In 30 billion years the descendants of humans might have a million year lifespan which seems to them to be the same length as ours does to us .
They just have less available free energy .
The beings that lived a few seconds after the big bang had whole civilizations which lasted microseconds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Death is a misnomer.
Physical processes will be different and much slower as entropy increases, but there is no hard limit which is ever reached.
In 30 billion years the descendants of humans might have a million year lifespan which seems to them to be the same length as ours does to us.
They just have less available free energy.
The beings that lived a few seconds after the big bang had whole civilizations which lasted microseconds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905218</id>
	<title>Physicist anyone?</title>
	<author>ground.zero.612</author>
	<datestamp>1264524720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can someone prove to me the method by which energy becomes unable to do any work?</p><p>

I am very curious about how such an event is even possible, and what the evidence is to suggest that it's actually happening.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone prove to me the method by which energy becomes unable to do any work ?
I am very curious about how such an event is even possible , and what the evidence is to suggest that it 's actually happening .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone prove to me the method by which energy becomes unable to do any work?
I am very curious about how such an event is even possible, and what the evidence is to suggest that it's actually happening.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30910668</id>
	<title>Re:Any reason at all for matter, or energy?</title>
	<author>Alamais</author>
	<datestamp>1264503660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe the universe is some sort of giant 'virtual particle'-esq expression.  With virtual/free-energy particles, there is nothing, then there's a pair of particles, and then there's nothing again.  So perhaps there was nothing, then there was a pair of universes (matter/anti-matter?), and then will be nothing.</p><p>Of course, it raises a question: in quantum, virtual particles are allowed because they exist for a short time (the energy-time expression of the uncertainty relation).  That's because our 'vacuum' isn't really 'nothing'.  If the universe exists within a true, timeless nothing, then the whole energy-time-uncertainty-virtual-blah thing kinda breaks down.  If not, then that implies that time is not a facet of our universe alone and that our universe is 'contained' within some other...thing.</p><p>I once wrote a 'creation myth' for a mythology course.  It basically started out, "First, there was nothing.  But that was boring, so something happened."</p><p>We're here because we're here because we're here...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the universe is some sort of giant 'virtual particle'-esq expression .
With virtual/free-energy particles , there is nothing , then there 's a pair of particles , and then there 's nothing again .
So perhaps there was nothing , then there was a pair of universes ( matter/anti-matter ?
) , and then will be nothing.Of course , it raises a question : in quantum , virtual particles are allowed because they exist for a short time ( the energy-time expression of the uncertainty relation ) .
That 's because our 'vacuum ' is n't really 'nothing' .
If the universe exists within a true , timeless nothing , then the whole energy-time-uncertainty-virtual-blah thing kinda breaks down .
If not , then that implies that time is not a facet of our universe alone and that our universe is 'contained ' within some other...thing.I once wrote a 'creation myth ' for a mythology course .
It basically started out , " First , there was nothing .
But that was boring , so something happened .
" We 're here because we 're here because we 're here.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the universe is some sort of giant 'virtual particle'-esq expression.
With virtual/free-energy particles, there is nothing, then there's a pair of particles, and then there's nothing again.
So perhaps there was nothing, then there was a pair of universes (matter/anti-matter?
), and then will be nothing.Of course, it raises a question: in quantum, virtual particles are allowed because they exist for a short time (the energy-time expression of the uncertainty relation).
That's because our 'vacuum' isn't really 'nothing'.
If the universe exists within a true, timeless nothing, then the whole energy-time-uncertainty-virtual-blah thing kinda breaks down.
If not, then that implies that time is not a facet of our universe alone and that our universe is 'contained' within some other...thing.I once wrote a 'creation myth' for a mythology course.
It basically started out, "First, there was nothing.
But that was boring, so something happened.
"We're here because we're here because we're here...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908606</id>
	<title>Any reason at all for matter, or energy?</title>
	<author>spineboy</author>
	<datestamp>1264537800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thermodynamics says you can't create energy - well then how did it get here in the first place?<br>Why is there anything at all - there is no good reason for there to be matter, or even energy</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thermodynamics says you ca n't create energy - well then how did it get here in the first place ? Why is there anything at all - there is no good reason for there to be matter , or even energy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thermodynamics says you can't create energy - well then how did it get here in the first place?Why is there anything at all - there is no good reason for there to be matter, or even energy</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908702</id>
	<title>Re:OMG!!!</title>
	<author>colonelquesadilla</author>
	<datestamp>1264538400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have enlisted several of my fellow graduate students, in exchange for a nominal fee we are offering "Entropy Credits".  Since many of you may need to work, clean, etc on a daily basis, we will, in exchange for said fee, spend one day doing absolutely nothing, thereby saving a small amount of entropy to displace your days contribution to the heat death of the universe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have enlisted several of my fellow graduate students , in exchange for a nominal fee we are offering " Entropy Credits " .
Since many of you may need to work , clean , etc on a daily basis , we will , in exchange for said fee , spend one day doing absolutely nothing , thereby saving a small amount of entropy to displace your days contribution to the heat death of the universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have enlisted several of my fellow graduate students, in exchange for a nominal fee we are offering "Entropy Credits".
Since many of you may need to work, clean, etc on a daily basis, we will, in exchange for said fee, spend one day doing absolutely nothing, thereby saving a small amount of entropy to displace your days contribution to the heat death of the universe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30912866</id>
	<title>Re:Entropy increasing, Slashdot-style</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264519080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a quote from that story in my master's thesis...</p><p>"Entropy, little sweet, is just a word which means the amount of running-down of the universe."</p><p>One of my favorite stories.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a quote from that story in my master 's thesis... " Entropy , little sweet , is just a word which means the amount of running-down of the universe .
" One of my favorite stories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a quote from that story in my master's thesis..."Entropy, little sweet, is just a word which means the amount of running-down of the universe.
"One of my favorite stories.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412</id>
	<title>two possible futures now cut shorter....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264521600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Star formation is believed to end about 10^14 years from now, the total entropy of universe only affects events after that.  Not a worry.  If protons decay with 10^32 year half-life, then practically all nucleons decay after 10^40 years, which leaves all black holes to evaporate after about 10^99 years.</p><p>If protons don't decay as we suspect, then universe slowly tunnels to iron-56, (light nuclei via fusion and heavier via fission) in about 10^1500 years, which coalesce into black holes or neutron stars in about 10^10^76 years (yup, double exponent).</p><p>So quite frankly, this bit about more entropy means little for life as we know it, though if life can arise by some heat-engine powered means (due to temperature differences only).  still the time scales are staggering.</p><p>but all mute if Big Rip is possible, we might only have 22 billion years left!:</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big\_Rip" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big\_Rip</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Star formation is believed to end about 10 ^ 14 years from now , the total entropy of universe only affects events after that .
Not a worry .
If protons decay with 10 ^ 32 year half-life , then practically all nucleons decay after 10 ^ 40 years , which leaves all black holes to evaporate after about 10 ^ 99 years.If protons do n't decay as we suspect , then universe slowly tunnels to iron-56 , ( light nuclei via fusion and heavier via fission ) in about 10 ^ 1500 years , which coalesce into black holes or neutron stars in about 10 ^ 10 ^ 76 years ( yup , double exponent ) .So quite frankly , this bit about more entropy means little for life as we know it , though if life can arise by some heat-engine powered means ( due to temperature differences only ) .
still the time scales are staggering.but all mute if Big Rip is possible , we might only have 22 billion years left !
: http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big \ _Rip [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Star formation is believed to end about 10^14 years from now, the total entropy of universe only affects events after that.
Not a worry.
If protons decay with 10^32 year half-life, then practically all nucleons decay after 10^40 years, which leaves all black holes to evaporate after about 10^99 years.If protons don't decay as we suspect, then universe slowly tunnels to iron-56, (light nuclei via fusion and heavier via fission) in about 10^1500 years, which coalesce into black holes or neutron stars in about 10^10^76 years (yup, double exponent).So quite frankly, this bit about more entropy means little for life as we know it, though if life can arise by some heat-engine powered means (due to temperature differences only).
still the time scales are staggering.but all mute if Big Rip is possible, we might only have 22 billion years left!
:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big\_Rip [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905330</id>
	<title>Global warming again?</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1264525080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's that global warming stuff again.</p><p>We need to ban SUV's (only type of car that causes global warming), and buy carbon credits from Algore. That will fix this problem, just like here onm Earth!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's that global warming stuff again.We need to ban SUV 's ( only type of car that causes global warming ) , and buy carbon credits from Algore .
That will fix this problem , just like here onm Earth !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's that global warming stuff again.We need to ban SUV's (only type of car that causes global warming), and buy carbon credits from Algore.
That will fix this problem, just like here onm Earth!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906132</id>
	<title>Re:OMG!!!</title>
	<author>Tsar</author>
	<datestamp>1264527960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So as well as peak oil now we have to worry about peak universe?</p></div><p>Worrying isn't enough--it's time to ACT!<br>Assuming, of course, that this is <i>anthropogenic</i> entropy...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So as well as peak oil now we have to worry about peak universe ? Worrying is n't enough--it 's time to ACT ! Assuming , of course , that this is anthropogenic entropy.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So as well as peak oil now we have to worry about peak universe?Worrying isn't enough--it's time to ACT!Assuming, of course, that this is anthropogenic entropy...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904150</id>
	<title>Australian researcher?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264520760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll wait until this is confirmed by some real researchers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll wait until this is confirmed by some real researchers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll wait until this is confirmed by some real researchers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904766</id>
	<title>don't worry</title>
	<author>doti</author>
	<datestamp>1264522860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.multivax.com/last\_question.html" title="multivax.com">http://www.multivax.com/last\_question.html</a> [multivax.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.multivax.com/last \ _question.html [ multivax.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.multivax.com/last\_question.html [multivax.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906460</id>
	<title>Re:The universe could go back to low entropy</title>
	<author>ElectricTurtle</author>
	<datestamp>1264529100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>IANAP, but it seems to me that there may be aspects to physics at work at the 'universe' level that we just don't have the ability to observe, let alone analyze and test. Our knowledge of the physical universe is so small, and our ability to model and test physical properties is so limited, I think that most theories that try to explain phenomena outside/beyond the level of a planetary system are not much more than well-reasoned extrapolated estimates. This why we have revelations like this that the math doesn't jive with the latest observation because our equipment wasn't good enough before or the model wasn't complete.<br> <br>
I think it's entirely possible that there are 'thresholds' in physics, that matter and energy will behave in a consistent way until some threshold is passed, and then the behavioral consistency will change. There's no way to test or observe this, which makes it by definition unscientific, but I don't think that it's really a matter of alternate universes or laws. Alternate in relation/comparison perhaps, but no more so than a matter state change (ice behaves in one consistent way, water in another, but they're not alternate materials, a threshold just needs to be crossed).</htmltext>
<tokenext>IANAP , but it seems to me that there may be aspects to physics at work at the 'universe ' level that we just do n't have the ability to observe , let alone analyze and test .
Our knowledge of the physical universe is so small , and our ability to model and test physical properties is so limited , I think that most theories that try to explain phenomena outside/beyond the level of a planetary system are not much more than well-reasoned extrapolated estimates .
This why we have revelations like this that the math does n't jive with the latest observation because our equipment was n't good enough before or the model was n't complete .
I think it 's entirely possible that there are 'thresholds ' in physics , that matter and energy will behave in a consistent way until some threshold is passed , and then the behavioral consistency will change .
There 's no way to test or observe this , which makes it by definition unscientific , but I do n't think that it 's really a matter of alternate universes or laws .
Alternate in relation/comparison perhaps , but no more so than a matter state change ( ice behaves in one consistent way , water in another , but they 're not alternate materials , a threshold just needs to be crossed ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IANAP, but it seems to me that there may be aspects to physics at work at the 'universe' level that we just don't have the ability to observe, let alone analyze and test.
Our knowledge of the physical universe is so small, and our ability to model and test physical properties is so limited, I think that most theories that try to explain phenomena outside/beyond the level of a planetary system are not much more than well-reasoned extrapolated estimates.
This why we have revelations like this that the math doesn't jive with the latest observation because our equipment wasn't good enough before or the model wasn't complete.
I think it's entirely possible that there are 'thresholds' in physics, that matter and energy will behave in a consistent way until some threshold is passed, and then the behavioral consistency will change.
There's no way to test or observe this, which makes it by definition unscientific, but I don't think that it's really a matter of alternate universes or laws.
Alternate in relation/comparison perhaps, but no more so than a matter state change (ice behaves in one consistent way, water in another, but they're not alternate materials, a threshold just needs to be crossed).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904742</id>
	<title>Re:Does it bother anyone else</title>
	<author>svtdragon</author>
	<datestamp>1264522800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Very well then...<p><div class="quote"><p>Dr. Lineweaver compared their results to a car's <b>ethanol</b> tank. He states, 'It's a bit like looking at your gas gauge and saying "I thought I had half an <b>ethanol</b> tank, but I only have a quarter of a tank."</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Very well then...Dr. Lineweaver compared their results to a car 's ethanol tank .
He states , 'It 's a bit like looking at your gas gauge and saying " I thought I had half an ethanol tank , but I only have a quarter of a tank .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very well then...Dr. Lineweaver compared their results to a car's ethanol tank.
He states, 'It's a bit like looking at your gas gauge and saying "I thought I had half an ethanol tank, but I only have a quarter of a tank.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905568</id>
	<title>Re:OMG!!!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1264525920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al\_Bundy" title="wikipedia.org">Al</a> [wikipedia.org]? Is that you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Al [ wikipedia.org ] ?
Is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Al [wikipedia.org]?
Is that you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904468</id>
	<title>Re:OMG!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264521780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forget global warming. Your SUV is causing universal warming!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget global warming .
Your SUV is causing universal warming !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget global warming.
Your SUV is causing universal warming!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907052</id>
	<title>Re:Oh noes!</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1264531620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>You know, not everything in science needs to or should be translated into every day terms.</i> <br> <br>
I'm not clear on what you mean by this... can you please explain it in terms of a car analogy?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , not everything in science needs to or should be translated into every day terms .
I 'm not clear on what you mean by this... can you please explain it in terms of a car analogy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, not everything in science needs to or should be translated into every day terms.
I'm not clear on what you mean by this... can you please explain it in terms of a car analogy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907696</id>
	<title>"...will get us as far as we need to go..."</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1264534380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And just how far is that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And just how far is that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And just how far is that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905702</id>
	<title>how far?</title>
	<author>Ephemeriis</author>
	<datestamp>1264526340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Fortunately, that quarter of a tank will still get us as far as we need to go and then some.</p></div><p>And just how far is it that we need to go?</p><p>I understand that the universe will out-live me by several orders of magnitude...  And my children...  And my children's children...  Etc...</p><p>I understand that the Earth will be consumed by our sun long before the universe dies...</p><p>But I'm just wondering what "as far as we need to go" means...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fortunately , that quarter of a tank will still get us as far as we need to go and then some.And just how far is it that we need to go ? I understand that the universe will out-live me by several orders of magnitude... And my children... And my children 's children... Etc...I understand that the Earth will be consumed by our sun long before the universe dies...But I 'm just wondering what " as far as we need to go " means.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fortunately, that quarter of a tank will still get us as far as we need to go and then some.And just how far is it that we need to go?I understand that the universe will out-live me by several orders of magnitude...  And my children...  And my children's children...  Etc...I understand that the Earth will be consumed by our sun long before the universe dies...But I'm just wondering what "as far as we need to go" means...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907056</id>
	<title>Re:Physicist anyone?</title>
	<author>Eudial</author>
	<datestamp>1264531620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Entropy is a statistical thing. When you consume energy, it looses order. A charged capacitor is very ordered: You have a positive charge on one side, and a negative charge on the other. When you hook it up to a lightbulb, the energy will transform into heat and light. But try as you might, warming and shining light on a lightbulb hooked up to a capacitor will not charge it up again, because out of all the ways this light and warmth can go, very few of them act towards charging the capacitor.</p><p>Ordered energy is more useful than "random" energy. What the second law of thermodynamics says is that on average, energy tends to become more "random". While you can turn random energy into ordered energy, it is never efficient: You always spend more energy turning it into ordered energy, than you gain spending it again.</p><p>So it's not that energy with high entropy is unable to do work, it's that the work it can do is less useful.</p><p>Which is for example why you should never use resistive heating to warm stuff, it's a waste of entropy. You should use that electricity to do meaningful work while creating heat as a by product, not as a goal in it self.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Entropy is a statistical thing .
When you consume energy , it looses order .
A charged capacitor is very ordered : You have a positive charge on one side , and a negative charge on the other .
When you hook it up to a lightbulb , the energy will transform into heat and light .
But try as you might , warming and shining light on a lightbulb hooked up to a capacitor will not charge it up again , because out of all the ways this light and warmth can go , very few of them act towards charging the capacitor.Ordered energy is more useful than " random " energy .
What the second law of thermodynamics says is that on average , energy tends to become more " random " .
While you can turn random energy into ordered energy , it is never efficient : You always spend more energy turning it into ordered energy , than you gain spending it again.So it 's not that energy with high entropy is unable to do work , it 's that the work it can do is less useful.Which is for example why you should never use resistive heating to warm stuff , it 's a waste of entropy .
You should use that electricity to do meaningful work while creating heat as a by product , not as a goal in it self .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Entropy is a statistical thing.
When you consume energy, it looses order.
A charged capacitor is very ordered: You have a positive charge on one side, and a negative charge on the other.
When you hook it up to a lightbulb, the energy will transform into heat and light.
But try as you might, warming and shining light on a lightbulb hooked up to a capacitor will not charge it up again, because out of all the ways this light and warmth can go, very few of them act towards charging the capacitor.Ordered energy is more useful than "random" energy.
What the second law of thermodynamics says is that on average, energy tends to become more "random".
While you can turn random energy into ordered energy, it is never efficient: You always spend more energy turning it into ordered energy, than you gain spending it again.So it's not that energy with high entropy is unable to do work, it's that the work it can do is less useful.Which is for example why you should never use resistive heating to warm stuff, it's a waste of entropy.
You should use that electricity to do meaningful work while creating heat as a by product, not as a goal in it self.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908478</id>
	<title>Re:two possible futures now cut shorter....</title>
	<author>Conanymous Award</author>
	<datestamp>1264537140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's actually Game Over for Earth in some 500 million &ndash; 1 billion years, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#Life\_cycle" title="wikipedia.org">thanks to our own Sun getting more luminous</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's actually Game Over for Earth in some 500 million    1 billion years , thanks to our own Sun getting more luminous [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's actually Game Over for Earth in some 500 million – 1 billion years, thanks to our own Sun getting more luminous [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30915632</id>
	<title>Ahhh bullshit</title>
	<author>dogzdik</author>
	<datestamp>1264598400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How can you be getting more of nothing by removing it fastera?

super-massive black holes 'are the largest
contributor to the entropy of the observable universe, contributing at
least an order of magnitude more entropy than previously estimated.

"Oh jeezers, jeezers help me, the universe is rooned!".....

Sure - now piss off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can you be getting more of nothing by removing it fastera ?
super-massive black holes 'are the largest contributor to the entropy of the observable universe , contributing at least an order of magnitude more entropy than previously estimated .
" Oh jeezers , jeezers help me , the universe is rooned ! " .... .
Sure - now piss off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can you be getting more of nothing by removing it fastera?
super-massive black holes 'are the largest
contributor to the entropy of the observable universe, contributing at
least an order of magnitude more entropy than previously estimated.
"Oh jeezers, jeezers help me, the universe is rooned!".....
Sure - now piss off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905596</id>
	<title>Multivax</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264525980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your question:</p><p>How can entropy be reversed?</p><p>Returned the following results:</p><p>THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your question : How can entropy be reversed ? Returned the following results : THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your question:How can entropy be reversed?Returned the following results:THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30911754</id>
	<title>Re:As far as we need to go?</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1264509900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>&gt; Fortunately, that quarter of a tank will still get us as far as we need to go and then some.</p><p>And where is it that we're going?</p></div><p>I don't know, the editor tacked that bit on.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Fortunately , that quarter of a tank will still get us as far as we need to go and then some.And where is it that we 're going ? I do n't know , the editor tacked that bit on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Fortunately, that quarter of a tank will still get us as far as we need to go and then some.And where is it that we're going?I don't know, the editor tacked that bit on.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904600</id>
	<title>Re:The universe could go back to low entropy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264522260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Some people would say time would then be going in reverse...</i></p><p>Oh Odin, I hope not; I don't want to be sucking up poop from the toilet into my arsehole!  (However, at least I knew it's mine.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some people would say time would then be going in reverse...Oh Odin , I hope not ; I do n't want to be sucking up poop from the toilet into my arsehole !
( However , at least I knew it 's mine .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some people would say time would then be going in reverse...Oh Odin, I hope not; I don't want to be sucking up poop from the toilet into my arsehole!
(However, at least I knew it's mine.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905192</id>
	<title>Re:Entropy increasing, Slashdot-style</title>
	<author>bluie-</author>
	<datestamp>1264524600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.multivax.com/last\_question.html" title="multivax.com" rel="nofollow">best short story ever.</a> [multivax.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>best short story ever .
[ multivax.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>best short story ever.
[multivax.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906280</id>
	<title>Re:Entropy increasing, Slashdot-style</title>
	<author>un\_malpaso</author>
	<datestamp>1264528560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Redundancy. Post everything twice.
Redundancy. Post everything twice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Redundancy .
Post everything twice .
Redundancy. Post everything twice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Redundancy.
Post everything twice.
Redundancy. Post everything twice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30915932</id>
	<title>Baa humbug!</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1264600740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heat death my ass - its minus 20C here! *shiver*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heat death my ass - its minus 20C here !
* shiver *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heat death my ass - its minus 20C here!
*shiver*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907474</id>
	<title>Bad Car Analogies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264533480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>For those of us who like their science in the form of a car analogy, Dr. Lineweaver compared their results to a car's gas tank. He states, 'It's a bit like looking at your gas gauge and saying "I thought I had half a gas tank, but I only have a quarter of a tank."'</p></div></blockquote><p>Oh no, it's more like: "I thought I had my gas tank half full, but now I realize it's half empty."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For those of us who like their science in the form of a car analogy , Dr. Lineweaver compared their results to a car 's gas tank .
He states , 'It 's a bit like looking at your gas gauge and saying " I thought I had half a gas tank , but I only have a quarter of a tank .
" 'Oh no , it 's more like : " I thought I had my gas tank half full , but now I realize it 's half empty .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those of us who like their science in the form of a car analogy, Dr. Lineweaver compared their results to a car's gas tank.
He states, 'It's a bit like looking at your gas gauge and saying "I thought I had half a gas tank, but I only have a quarter of a tank.
"'Oh no, it's more like: "I thought I had my gas tank half full, but now I realize it's half empty.
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907298</id>
	<title>Re:two possible futures now cut shorter....</title>
	<author>Kaell Meynn</author>
	<datestamp>1264532580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe the expression is "moot".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe the expression is " moot " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe the expression is "moot".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905908</id>
	<title>Re:Inflation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264527060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are only 10 types of people, those that understand binary...</p><p>(the difference between a quarter and a half <em>is</em> an order of magnitude, a binary order of magnitude that is...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are only 10 types of people , those that understand binary... ( the difference between a quarter and a half is an order of magnitude , a binary order of magnitude that is... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are only 10 types of people, those that understand binary...(the difference between a quarter and a half is an order of magnitude, a binary order of magnitude that is...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906544</id>
	<title>Re:The universe could go back to low entropy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264529400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It probably won't happen we know that the universe is expanding and cooling at an ever accelerating speed. It doesn't seem to me that there will be conditions similar to the start of the universe ever again (in this universe at least).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It probably wo n't happen we know that the universe is expanding and cooling at an ever accelerating speed .
It does n't seem to me that there will be conditions similar to the start of the universe ever again ( in this universe at least ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It probably won't happen we know that the universe is expanding and cooling at an ever accelerating speed.
It doesn't seem to me that there will be conditions similar to the start of the universe ever again (in this universe at least).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906138</id>
	<title>Message from God</title>
	<author>un\_malpaso</author>
	<datestamp>1264527960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OMG! Sorry for the xtra mess, guys. will clean up the entropy when I get back. kthx --- GOD</htmltext>
<tokenext>OMG !
Sorry for the xtra mess , guys .
will clean up the entropy when I get back .
kthx --- GOD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMG!
Sorry for the xtra mess, guys.
will clean up the entropy when I get back.
kthx --- GOD</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907626</id>
	<title>Re:As far as we need to go?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264534140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Release of Duke Nukem Forever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Release of Duke Nukem Forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Release of Duke Nukem Forever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30913112</id>
	<title>Re:Oh noes!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264521600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ha, you think a few more billion years would've made a difference ?!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ha , you think a few more billion years would 've made a difference ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ha, you think a few more billion years would've made a difference ?!
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905214</id>
	<title>The ori blackhole powered super gates are speeding</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264524660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The ori blackhole powered super gates are speeding it up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The ori blackhole powered super gates are speeding it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ori blackhole powered super gates are speeding it up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906578</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>JustNiz</author>
	<datestamp>1264529520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Warming isn't just global, its universal!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Warming is n't just global , its universal !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Warming isn't just global, its universal!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905622</id>
	<title>Re:two possible futures now cut shorter....</title>
	<author>dylan\_-</author>
	<datestamp>1264526040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If protons don't decay as we suspect, then universe slowly tunnels to iron-56, (light nuclei via fusion and heavier via fission) in about 10^1500 years, which coalesce into black holes or neutron stars in about 10^10^76 years (yup, double exponent).</p></div></blockquote><p>10^640 years should be enough for anyone.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If protons do n't decay as we suspect , then universe slowly tunnels to iron-56 , ( light nuclei via fusion and heavier via fission ) in about 10 ^ 1500 years , which coalesce into black holes or neutron stars in about 10 ^ 10 ^ 76 years ( yup , double exponent ) .10 ^ 640 years should be enough for anyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If protons don't decay as we suspect, then universe slowly tunnels to iron-56, (light nuclei via fusion and heavier via fission) in about 10^1500 years, which coalesce into black holes or neutron stars in about 10^10^76 years (yup, double exponent).10^640 years should be enough for anyone.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908098</id>
	<title>Re:no problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264535820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Considering that red dwarfs are expected to last trillions of years (no red dwarf has ever died. The universe is too young)</p></div></blockquote><p>
Then explain why it's been so long since there have been any new episodes. Lister, Kryten, Rimmer, and Cat have to be up to something...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering that red dwarfs are expected to last trillions of years ( no red dwarf has ever died .
The universe is too young ) Then explain why it 's been so long since there have been any new episodes .
Lister , Kryten , Rimmer , and Cat have to be up to something.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering that red dwarfs are expected to last trillions of years (no red dwarf has ever died.
The universe is too young)
Then explain why it's been so long since there have been any new episodes.
Lister, Kryten, Rimmer, and Cat have to be up to something...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904380</id>
	<title>The Universe is an infinite loop</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264521480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So the Universe only has 100 trillion more years before it is all sucked into a massive uber black hole.  And then, one big void.  And then, the next big bang, and it all starts over again.  We're actually on iteration number 42 of an infinite loop.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So the Universe only has 100 trillion more years before it is all sucked into a massive uber black hole .
And then , one big void .
And then , the next big bang , and it all starts over again .
We 're actually on iteration number 42 of an infinite loop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the Universe only has 100 trillion more years before it is all sucked into a massive uber black hole.
And then, one big void.
And then, the next big bang, and it all starts over again.
We're actually on iteration number 42 of an infinite loop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905094</id>
	<title>Re:Entropy increasing, Slashdot-style</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1264524240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let there be light.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let there be light .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let there be light.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904024</id>
	<title>OMG!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264520280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So as well as peak oil now we have to worry about peak universe?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So as well as peak oil now we have to worry about peak universe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So as well as peak oil now we have to worry about peak universe?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906688</id>
	<title>Re:heat death</title>
	<author>mr exploiter</author>
	<datestamp>1264530060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That you don't get thermodynamics it doesn't mean it's wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That you do n't get thermodynamics it does n't mean it 's wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That you don't get thermodynamics it doesn't mean it's wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904388</id>
	<title>no problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264521540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering that red dwarfs are expected to last trillions of years (no red dwarf has ever died.  The universe is too young), we just need to move to a planet around one of them, assuming they have habitable planets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering that red dwarfs are expected to last trillions of years ( no red dwarf has ever died .
The universe is too young ) , we just need to move to a planet around one of them , assuming they have habitable planets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering that red dwarfs are expected to last trillions of years (no red dwarf has ever died.
The universe is too young), we just need to move to a planet around one of them, assuming they have habitable planets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905564</id>
	<title>Re:Inflation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264525860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you assume that tank-fullness linear?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>you assume that tank-fullness linear ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you assume that tank-fullness linear?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30909358</id>
	<title>Crispy Sooner Or Later</title>
	<author>FrankDrebin</author>
	<datestamp>1264498260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The Andromeda galaxy is headed directly, directly in collision course with our own. Measurably. It's filling the sky - can be seen with the naked eye. In 5 billion years, which is to say <b>fucking soon</b> ladies and gentleman it's on us and if it hasn't happened before then our sun goes into a red giant or a red dwarf, we go to a crisp."   - Christopher Hitchens</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Andromeda galaxy is headed directly , directly in collision course with our own .
Measurably. It 's filling the sky - can be seen with the naked eye .
In 5 billion years , which is to say fucking soon ladies and gentleman it 's on us and if it has n't happened before then our sun goes into a red giant or a red dwarf , we go to a crisp .
" - Christopher Hitchens</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Andromeda galaxy is headed directly, directly in collision course with our own.
Measurably. It's filling the sky - can be seen with the naked eye.
In 5 billion years, which is to say fucking soon ladies and gentleman it's on us and if it hasn't happened before then our sun goes into a red giant or a red dwarf, we go to a crisp.
"   - Christopher Hitchens</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906664</id>
	<title>Re:two possible futures now cut shorter....</title>
	<author>mr exploiter</author>
	<datestamp>1264529940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Things fall into a black hole in a finite amount of time from their perspectives. We won't adapt we have a finite time left. And in "we" you can put anything you want and it'll still be true.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Things fall into a black hole in a finite amount of time from their perspectives .
We wo n't adapt we have a finite time left .
And in " we " you can put anything you want and it 'll still be true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Things fall into a black hole in a finite amount of time from their perspectives.
We won't adapt we have a finite time left.
And in "we" you can put anything you want and it'll still be true.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904082</id>
	<title>Entropy increasing, Slashdot-style</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1264520520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So how much entropy does the fact that this story is a duplicate add to the universe?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So how much entropy does the fact that this story is a duplicate add to the universe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how much entropy does the fact that this story is a duplicate add to the universe?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30917496</id>
	<title>Re:"Fortunately"?!</title>
	<author>julie007</author>
	<datestamp>1264608540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think your children are really too young to be having children.

I mean, you're going to end up with this ridiculous Russian doll situation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think your children are really too young to be having children .
I mean , you 're going to end up with this ridiculous Russian doll situation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think your children are really too young to be having children.
I mean, you're going to end up with this ridiculous Russian doll situation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907136</id>
	<title>Re:As far as we need to go?</title>
	<author>bjk002</author>
	<datestamp>1264531980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exit 42.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exit 42 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exit 42.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908708</id>
	<title>Re:two possible futures now cut shorter....</title>
	<author>Just Some Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1264538460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll be damned if I'm clicking a link called "Big Rip" on Slashdot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll be damned if I 'm clicking a link called " Big Rip " on Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll be damned if I'm clicking a link called "Big Rip" on Slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907318</id>
	<title>Re:two possible futures now cut shorter....</title>
	<author>benjamindees</author>
	<datestamp>1264532700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Star formation is believed to end about 10^14 years from now, the total entropy of universe only affects events after that.</p></div><p>Assuming we don't get to all that hydrogen first.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Star formation is believed to end about 10 ^ 14 years from now , the total entropy of universe only affects events after that.Assuming we do n't get to all that hydrogen first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Star formation is believed to end about 10^14 years from now, the total entropy of universe only affects events after that.Assuming we don't get to all that hydrogen first.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904208</id>
	<title>Heat Life Insurance 4 Sale!!! Offer Ends Soon!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264520940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh crap, can't really think of a joke with the words "insurance" and "capitalism."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh crap , ca n't really think of a joke with the words " insurance " and " capitalism .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh crap, can't really think of a joke with the words "insurance" and "capitalism.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904290</id>
	<title>bah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264521240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>in the Astrophysical Journal, Australian researchers </i>
<br>
<br>
Oh what do those penal colony convicts know about astrophysics...</htmltext>
<tokenext>in the Astrophysical Journal , Australian researchers Oh what do those penal colony convicts know about astrophysics.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in the Astrophysical Journal, Australian researchers 


Oh what do those penal colony convicts know about astrophysics...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904454</id>
	<title>Quick! slap a tax on black holes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264521720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>after all taxing energy consumption works so well in reducing "heat death" here on planet earth</htmltext>
<tokenext>after all taxing energy consumption works so well in reducing " heat death " here on planet earth</tokentext>
<sentencetext>after all taxing energy consumption works so well in reducing "heat death" here on planet earth</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907160</id>
	<title>Re:The Universe is an infinite loop ..  here's why</title>
	<author>JMH4343</author>
	<datestamp>1264532040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>read  "The Last Question" by Isaac Asimov

He wrote: This is by far my favorite story of all those I have written. After all, I undertook to tell several trillion years of human history in the space of a short story and I leave it to you as to how well I succeeded. I also undertook another task, but I won't tell you what that was lest l spoil the story for you. It is a curious fact that innumerable readers have asked me if I wrote this story. They seem never to remember the title of the story or (for sure) the author, except for the vague thought it might be me. But, of course, they never forget the story itself especially the ending. The idea seems to drown out everything -- and I'm satisfied that it should.

The last question, posed in 2061, was this:  Will mankind one day without the net expenditure of energy be able to restore the sun to its full youthfulness even after it had died of old age?
Or maybe it could be put more simply like this: How can the net amount of entropy of the universe be massively decreased?</htmltext>
<tokenext>read " The Last Question " by Isaac Asimov He wrote : This is by far my favorite story of all those I have written .
After all , I undertook to tell several trillion years of human history in the space of a short story and I leave it to you as to how well I succeeded .
I also undertook another task , but I wo n't tell you what that was lest l spoil the story for you .
It is a curious fact that innumerable readers have asked me if I wrote this story .
They seem never to remember the title of the story or ( for sure ) the author , except for the vague thought it might be me .
But , of course , they never forget the story itself especially the ending .
The idea seems to drown out everything -- and I 'm satisfied that it should .
The last question , posed in 2061 , was this : Will mankind one day without the net expenditure of energy be able to restore the sun to its full youthfulness even after it had died of old age ?
Or maybe it could be put more simply like this : How can the net amount of entropy of the universe be massively decreased ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>read  "The Last Question" by Isaac Asimov

He wrote: This is by far my favorite story of all those I have written.
After all, I undertook to tell several trillion years of human history in the space of a short story and I leave it to you as to how well I succeeded.
I also undertook another task, but I won't tell you what that was lest l spoil the story for you.
It is a curious fact that innumerable readers have asked me if I wrote this story.
They seem never to remember the title of the story or (for sure) the author, except for the vague thought it might be me.
But, of course, they never forget the story itself especially the ending.
The idea seems to drown out everything -- and I'm satisfied that it should.
The last question, posed in 2061, was this:  Will mankind one day without the net expenditure of energy be able to restore the sun to its full youthfulness even after it had died of old age?
Or maybe it could be put more simply like this: How can the net amount of entropy of the universe be massively decreased?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230</id>
	<title>As far as we need to go?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264521000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Fortunately, that quarter of a tank will still get us as far as we need to go and then some.</p><p>And where is it that we're going?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Fortunately , that quarter of a tank will still get us as far as we need to go and then some.And where is it that we 're going ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Fortunately, that quarter of a tank will still get us as far as we need to go and then some.And where is it that we're going?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904020</id>
	<title>f1rst ps0t</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264520280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for the past several years I've been mailing all my feces to Ron Paul. Every time I defecate, I do so in a zip lock bag, which I then send to Ron Paul's home address via USPS priority mail. Though I always clearly write my name and address on the return portion of the envelope, I have never received a reply, nor have any of my mailings been refused.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for the past several years I 've been mailing all my feces to Ron Paul .
Every time I defecate , I do so in a zip lock bag , which I then send to Ron Paul 's home address via USPS priority mail .
Though I always clearly write my name and address on the return portion of the envelope , I have never received a reply , nor have any of my mailings been refused .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for the past several years I've been mailing all my feces to Ron Paul.
Every time I defecate, I do so in a zip lock bag, which I then send to Ron Paul's home address via USPS priority mail.
Though I always clearly write my name and address on the return portion of the envelope, I have never received a reply, nor have any of my mailings been refused.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905480</id>
	<title>Speed increase or decrease?</title>
	<author>PietjeJantje</author>
	<datestamp>1264525620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The question is, if our tank is 95\% empty, would the speed increase because the black holes become greedy, or decrease because what's in between is too far away?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The question is , if our tank is 95 \ % empty , would the speed increase because the black holes become greedy , or decrease because what 's in between is too far away ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The question is, if our tank is 95\% empty, would the speed increase because the black holes become greedy, or decrease because what's in between is too far away?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905410</id>
	<title>Re:Not so sure...</title>
	<author>geekmux</author>
	<datestamp>1264525320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...given the not-quite-set-in-concrete nature of theoretical physics, string theory, and especially M-theory (...don't like this universe? we got more!), I don't think I'm going to sell the house and walk around in animal skins just yet.</p></div><p>I agree.  Given the number of times the word "theory" is used, I'm leaning more towards questioning <i>any</i> "facts" here...Just sayin'.</p><p>I believe there's a theory that states the true definition of theory as "guesstimate", but don't quote me on that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...given the not-quite-set-in-concrete nature of theoretical physics , string theory , and especially M-theory ( ...do n't like this universe ?
we got more !
) , I do n't think I 'm going to sell the house and walk around in animal skins just yet.I agree .
Given the number of times the word " theory " is used , I 'm leaning more towards questioning any " facts " here...Just sayin'.I believe there 's a theory that states the true definition of theory as " guesstimate " , but do n't quote me on that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...given the not-quite-set-in-concrete nature of theoretical physics, string theory, and especially M-theory (...don't like this universe?
we got more!
), I don't think I'm going to sell the house and walk around in animal skins just yet.I agree.
Given the number of times the word "theory" is used, I'm leaning more towards questioning any "facts" here...Just sayin'.I believe there's a theory that states the true definition of theory as "guesstimate", but don't quote me on that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907490</id>
	<title>Re:OMG!!!</title>
	<author>AshtangiMan</author>
	<datestamp>1264533540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>No.  It's anthropomorphic entropy.  And it's angry . . .</htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
It 's anthropomorphic entropy .
And it 's angry .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
It's anthropomorphic entropy.
And it's angry .
. .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907364</id>
	<title>No Problem</title>
	<author>sunspot42</author>
	<datestamp>1264532940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We'll just have the Logopolitans open a charged vacuum emboitment to E-Space.  Entropy problem solved!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 'll just have the Logopolitans open a charged vacuum emboitment to E-Space .
Entropy problem solved !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We'll just have the Logopolitans open a charged vacuum emboitment to E-Space.
Entropy problem solved!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30909230</id>
	<title>Well THAT'S no fun!</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1264497600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>TFAs should not provide us with bad car analogies.  That takes all the fun out of coming up with them ourselves!  &gt;:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>TFAs should not provide us with bad car analogies .
That takes all the fun out of coming up with them ourselves !
&gt; : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFAs should not provide us with bad car analogies.
That takes all the fun out of coming up with them ourselves!
&gt;:(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904314</id>
	<title>Re:As far as we need to go?</title>
	<author>joss</author>
	<datestamp>1264521300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to the grave</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to the grave</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to the grave</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30910406</id>
	<title>Re:no problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264502580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone seem to have called it...</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xeelee\_Sequence</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone seem to have called it...http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xeelee \ _Sequence</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone seem to have called it...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xeelee\_Sequence</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904784</id>
	<title>superstar sucked into a...</title>
	<author>syrinx</author>
	<datestamp>1264522920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> According to their research, super-massive black holes 'are the largest contributor to the entropy of the observable universe, contributing at least an order of magnitude more entropy than previously estimated.' </i></p><p>Super-massive black holes are also known to contribute to glaciers melting in the dead of night.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to their research , super-massive black holes 'are the largest contributor to the entropy of the observable universe , contributing at least an order of magnitude more entropy than previously estimated .
' Super-massive black holes are also known to contribute to glaciers melting in the dead of night .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> According to their research, super-massive black holes 'are the largest contributor to the entropy of the observable universe, contributing at least an order of magnitude more entropy than previously estimated.
' Super-massive black holes are also known to contribute to glaciers melting in the dead of night.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904328</id>
	<title>The universe could go back to low entropy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264521360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just because the laws of physics IN THIS UNIVERSE prevent that doesn't mean it can't happen since by definition the low entropy state the universe started in was created (in some form) by alternative laws of physics possibly outside this universe since the laws we know didn't exist at that point.</p><p>There's no reason why these alternative physical laws couldn't suddenly kick back in when the universe reaches a certain entropy state and start to reverse the whole process back to zero. Some people would say time would then be going in reverse but this doesn't need to be the case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because the laws of physics IN THIS UNIVERSE prevent that does n't mean it ca n't happen since by definition the low entropy state the universe started in was created ( in some form ) by alternative laws of physics possibly outside this universe since the laws we know did n't exist at that point.There 's no reason why these alternative physical laws could n't suddenly kick back in when the universe reaches a certain entropy state and start to reverse the whole process back to zero .
Some people would say time would then be going in reverse but this does n't need to be the case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because the laws of physics IN THIS UNIVERSE prevent that doesn't mean it can't happen since by definition the low entropy state the universe started in was created (in some form) by alternative laws of physics possibly outside this universe since the laws we know didn't exist at that point.There's no reason why these alternative physical laws couldn't suddenly kick back in when the universe reaches a certain entropy state and start to reverse the whole process back to zero.
Some people would say time would then be going in reverse but this doesn't need to be the case.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907512</id>
	<title>Dyson Spheres</title>
	<author>SpeedyGonz</author>
	<datestamp>1264533600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Considering that red dwarfs are expected to last trillions of years (no red dwarf has ever died. The universe is too young), we just need to move to a planet around one of them, <b>assuming they have habitable planets.</b> </i> <br> <br>

Us having the ability to travel all those light years to a red dwarf and possibly perishing because there are no habitable planets?<br> <br>

If we can travel FTL by then, why not imagining that we're able to send unmanned ships to build a cozy sphere around the geezer star, and then moving in?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering that red dwarfs are expected to last trillions of years ( no red dwarf has ever died .
The universe is too young ) , we just need to move to a planet around one of them , assuming they have habitable planets .
Us having the ability to travel all those light years to a red dwarf and possibly perishing because there are no habitable planets ?
If we can travel FTL by then , why not imagining that we 're able to send unmanned ships to build a cozy sphere around the geezer star , and then moving in ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering that red dwarfs are expected to last trillions of years (no red dwarf has ever died.
The universe is too young), we just need to move to a planet around one of them, assuming they have habitable planets.
Us having the ability to travel all those light years to a red dwarf and possibly perishing because there are no habitable planets?
If we can travel FTL by then, why not imagining that we're able to send unmanned ships to build a cozy sphere around the geezer star, and then moving in?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907354</id>
	<title>"super-massive black holes 'are"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264532880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not a god use of the <a href="http://theoatmeal.com/comics/apostrophe" title="theoatmeal.com" rel="nofollow">apostrophe</a> [theoatmeal.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not a god use of the apostrophe [ theoatmeal.com ] ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not a god use of the apostrophe [theoatmeal.com] ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906468</id>
	<title>Re:heat death</title>
	<author>rubycodez</author>
	<datestamp>1264529160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>actually, thermodynamics just was expanded to include work by radiation, work by changing quantum energy level, and also information theory.  Heat death of universe refers to inability to do meaningful work over any non-quantum time period.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>actually , thermodynamics just was expanded to include work by radiation , work by changing quantum energy level , and also information theory .
Heat death of universe refers to inability to do meaningful work over any non-quantum time period .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>actually, thermodynamics just was expanded to include work by radiation, work by changing quantum energy level, and also information theory.
Heat death of universe refers to inability to do meaningful work over any non-quantum time period.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30909220</id>
	<title>Re:Entropy increasing, Slashdot-style</title>
	<author>Dracophile</author>
	<datestamp>1264497600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apologies for the OT, but they could bypass the anti-caps filter for users with X amount of karma.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apologies for the OT , but they could bypass the anti-caps filter for users with X amount of karma .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apologies for the OT, but they could bypass the anti-caps filter for users with X amount of karma.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904482</id>
	<title>Oh noes!</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1264521840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>He states, 'It's a bit like looking at your gas gauge and saying "I thought I had half a gas tank, but I only have a quarter of a tank."'</p></div><p>Yes, that's *exactly* what it is like. (eyeroll)</p><p>You know, not everything in science needs to or should be translated into every day terms.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He states , 'It 's a bit like looking at your gas gauge and saying " I thought I had half a gas tank , but I only have a quarter of a tank .
" 'Yes , that 's * exactly * what it is like .
( eyeroll ) You know , not everything in science needs to or should be translated into every day terms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He states, 'It's a bit like looking at your gas gauge and saying "I thought I had half a gas tank, but I only have a quarter of a tank.
"'Yes, that's *exactly* what it is like.
(eyeroll)You know, not everything in science needs to or should be translated into every day terms.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30910008</id>
	<title>Re:no problem</title>
	<author>Orange Crush</author>
	<datestamp>1264500900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps none have died by running out of fuel--but I'm certain *some* have been destroyed by other means, collisions, novae, casualties of sibling star's supernovae, black holes, etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps none have died by running out of fuel--but I 'm certain * some * have been destroyed by other means , collisions , novae , casualties of sibling star 's supernovae , black holes , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps none have died by running out of fuel--but I'm certain *some* have been destroyed by other means, collisions, novae, casualties of sibling star's supernovae, black holes, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904090</id>
	<title>Can we handle this?</title>
	<author>badevlad</author>
	<datestamp>1264520520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, lets start to close the black holes one by one. I am too young to die!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , lets start to close the black holes one by one .
I am too young to die !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, lets start to close the black holes one by one.
I am too young to die!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904728</id>
	<title>OMG, Universal Warming^H Climate Change</title>
	<author>Androclese</author>
	<datestamp>1264522680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We must do something about this!!!  I know, lets start a Cosmic Credit fund to save the universe!</htmltext>
<tokenext>We must do something about this ! ! !
I know , lets start a Cosmic Credit fund to save the universe !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We must do something about this!!!
I know, lets start a Cosmic Credit fund to save the universe!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905852</id>
	<title>Don't worry....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264526820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry, surely the UN, Obama, Green Piece and China can solve this if they really try. I mean surely we awful humans have caused this. We are so disorganized and chaotic And we can all do our part by tidying up a little around the house. Every little bit counts right? I'm going to clean off my desk right now and I'm sure there is somewhere I can buy Intropy Credits to vicariously assuage my vicarious guilt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry , surely the UN , Obama , Green Piece and China can solve this if they really try .
I mean surely we awful humans have caused this .
We are so disorganized and chaotic And we can all do our part by tidying up a little around the house .
Every little bit counts right ?
I 'm going to clean off my desk right now and I 'm sure there is somewhere I can buy Intropy Credits to vicariously assuage my vicarious guilt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry, surely the UN, Obama, Green Piece and China can solve this if they really try.
I mean surely we awful humans have caused this.
We are so disorganized and chaotic And we can all do our part by tidying up a little around the house.
Every little bit counts right?
I'm going to clean off my desk right now and I'm sure there is somewhere I can buy Intropy Credits to vicariously assuage my vicarious guilt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905652</id>
	<title>Re:The universe could go back to low entropy</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1264526100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately completely different laws of physics are no more conducive to human survival than heat death is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately completely different laws of physics are no more conducive to human survival than heat death is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately completely different laws of physics are no more conducive to human survival than heat death is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906762</id>
	<title>Re:two possible futures now cut shorter....</title>
	<author>mdwstmusik</author>
	<datestamp>1264530420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only 22 billion years left?  Nobody panic!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...We still have time to exit the Universe in a "disorderly" manner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only 22 billion years left ?
Nobody panic !
...We still have time to exit the Universe in a " disorderly " manner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only 22 billion years left?
Nobody panic!
...We still have time to exit the Universe in a "disorderly" manner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904308</id>
	<title>"Fortunately"?!</title>
	<author>brian0918</author>
	<datestamp>1264521300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Fortunately, that quarter of a tank will still get us as far as we need to go and then some.</p></div><p>Yes, fortunately for <i>us</i>, maybe... but what about our children's children's children's<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... (* 10^80) children? Won't someone please think of them?!?!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fortunately , that quarter of a tank will still get us as far as we need to go and then some.Yes , fortunately for us , maybe... but what about our children 's children 's children 's ... ( * 10 ^ 80 ) children ?
Wo n't someone please think of them ? ! ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fortunately, that quarter of a tank will still get us as far as we need to go and then some.Yes, fortunately for us, maybe... but what about our children's children's children's ... (* 10^80) children?
Won't someone please think of them?!?
!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904402</id>
	<title>How far do we need to go?</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1264521540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>as far as we need to go and then some.</p></div></blockquote><p>You're saying that <em>now</em>.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>as far as we need to go and then some.You 're saying that now .
: -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as far as we need to go and then some.You're saying that now.
:-P
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904094</id>
	<title>30x higher than whose estimate?</title>
	<author>neurogeneticist</author>
	<datestamp>1264520520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>So is this 30x higher than the 100x higher that was reported here on Slashdot a few months ago?
<a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/06/1641232/Universe-Has-100x-More-Entropy-Than-We-Thought" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/06/1641232/Universe-Has-100x-More-Entropy-Than-We-Thought</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>So is this 30x higher than the 100x higher that was reported here on Slashdot a few months ago ?
http : //science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/06/1641232/Universe-Has-100x-More-Entropy-Than-We-Thought [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So is this 30x higher than the 100x higher that was reported here on Slashdot a few months ago?
http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/06/1641232/Universe-Has-100x-More-Entropy-Than-We-Thought [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904562</id>
	<title>Re:OMG!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264522140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hell, a quarter of a tank will still get us 'till the end of the universe!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hell , a quarter of a tank will still get us 'till the end of the universe !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hell, a quarter of a tank will still get us 'till the end of the universe!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906024</id>
	<title>Re:The universe could go back to low entropy</title>
	<author>mdm-adph</author>
	<datestamp>1264527540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When someone says "in <i>this</i> universe/reality," I'm always reminded of <a href="http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=1595" title="smbc-comics.com">http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=1595</a> [smbc-comics.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When someone says " in this universe/reality , " I 'm always reminded of http : //www.smbc-comics.com/index.php ? db = comics&amp;id = 1595 [ smbc-comics.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When someone says "in this universe/reality," I'm always reminded of http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=1595 [smbc-comics.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906748</id>
	<title>Re:two possible futures now cut shorter....</title>
	<author>ElectricTurtle</author>
	<datestamp>1264530300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Big Rip sounds like it doesn't pass the sniff test... the idea that matter/energy needs to relate by weak/strong force interaction to other matter/energy or IT WILL EXPLODE LOLOLOL. I just don't buy it. Matter is self-contained. The gravity of the moon doesn't come from the earth, and the gravity of the earth doesn't come from the sun. The relationship isn't some kind of inherited cascade. The implied units of relationship don't make any sense to me either... so galaxies have to be in interaction range of each other or THEY EXPLODE LOLOLOL? Galaxies? Why wouldn't all the stars, planets, and smaller material chunks within each galaxy be enough to relate to each other, assuming the premise of the theory? The whole thing sounds like something some PhDs came up with while on mind-altering drugs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Big Rip sounds like it does n't pass the sniff test... the idea that matter/energy needs to relate by weak/strong force interaction to other matter/energy or IT WILL EXPLODE LOLOLOL .
I just do n't buy it .
Matter is self-contained .
The gravity of the moon does n't come from the earth , and the gravity of the earth does n't come from the sun .
The relationship is n't some kind of inherited cascade .
The implied units of relationship do n't make any sense to me either... so galaxies have to be in interaction range of each other or THEY EXPLODE LOLOLOL ?
Galaxies ? Why would n't all the stars , planets , and smaller material chunks within each galaxy be enough to relate to each other , assuming the premise of the theory ?
The whole thing sounds like something some PhDs came up with while on mind-altering drugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Big Rip sounds like it doesn't pass the sniff test... the idea that matter/energy needs to relate by weak/strong force interaction to other matter/energy or IT WILL EXPLODE LOLOLOL.
I just don't buy it.
Matter is self-contained.
The gravity of the moon doesn't come from the earth, and the gravity of the earth doesn't come from the sun.
The relationship isn't some kind of inherited cascade.
The implied units of relationship don't make any sense to me either... so galaxies have to be in interaction range of each other or THEY EXPLODE LOLOLOL?
Galaxies? Why wouldn't all the stars, planets, and smaller material chunks within each galaxy be enough to relate to each other, assuming the premise of the theory?
The whole thing sounds like something some PhDs came up with while on mind-altering drugs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30917496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30910758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30911754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30913486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30910008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30909220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30909880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30913112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30910668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30910524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30912866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907512
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_145223_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30910406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30911754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30910758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906046
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907160
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904454
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906460
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906132
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908702
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904594
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908606
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30910668
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30910524
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905568
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904798
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30917496
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904090
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30910008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30910406
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30913112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30909880
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906466
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905304
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906468
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906704
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904692
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906664
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907902
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30913486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30908356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904290
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907056
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30907052
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905564
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_145223.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30904592
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905094
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30905192
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906306
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30906564
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30909220
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_145223.30912866
</commentlist>
</conversation>
