<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_26_0132226</id>
	<title>Uranus and Neptune May Have "Oceans of Diamonds"</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1264516380000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Third Position writes <i>"<a href="http://news.discovery.com/space/diamond-oceans-jupiter-uranus.html">Oceans of liquid diamond</a> topped with solid 'icebergs' of the precious gems could be on Uranus and Neptune. The first-ever detailed research into the melting point of diamond found it behaves like water during melting and freezing &mdash; with its solid form floating on the liquid. A large diamond ocean on one or both of the planets could provide an explanation for an oddity they both share:  unlike Earth, they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles."</i> The article doesn't mention what the pressures might be like in these outer-planets environments, but the researchers found that liquefying diamond requires 40 million times Earth's atmospheric pressure at sea level.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Third Position writes " Oceans of liquid diamond topped with solid 'icebergs ' of the precious gems could be on Uranus and Neptune .
The first-ever detailed research into the melting point of diamond found it behaves like water during melting and freezing    with its solid form floating on the liquid .
A large diamond ocean on one or both of the planets could provide an explanation for an oddity they both share : unlike Earth , they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles .
" The article does n't mention what the pressures might be like in these outer-planets environments , but the researchers found that liquefying diamond requires 40 million times Earth 's atmospheric pressure at sea level .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Third Position writes "Oceans of liquid diamond topped with solid 'icebergs' of the precious gems could be on Uranus and Neptune.
The first-ever detailed research into the melting point of diamond found it behaves like water during melting and freezing — with its solid form floating on the liquid.
A large diamond ocean on one or both of the planets could provide an explanation for an oddity they both share:  unlike Earth, they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles.
" The article doesn't mention what the pressures might be like in these outer-planets environments, but the researchers found that liquefying diamond requires 40 million times Earth's atmospheric pressure at sea level.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901024</id>
	<title>How is this news?</title>
	<author>BigBadBus</author>
	<datestamp>1264449300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember a book published c.1980 which had exposes of common fallacies in science, and things that make you go "Hmmmm!". One of the stories was "Neptune and Uranus are 17\% crystallised diamonds." Alright, the story above talks about liquid diamonds, but the idea of their being precious materials in the outer solar systems isn't new!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember a book published c.1980 which had exposes of common fallacies in science , and things that make you go " Hmmmm ! " .
One of the stories was " Neptune and Uranus are 17 \ % crystallised diamonds .
" Alright , the story above talks about liquid diamonds , but the idea of their being precious materials in the outer solar systems is n't new !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember a book published c.1980 which had exposes of common fallacies in science, and things that make you go "Hmmmm!".
One of the stories was "Neptune and Uranus are 17\% crystallised diamonds.
" Alright, the story above talks about liquid diamonds, but the idea of their being precious materials in the outer solar systems isn't new!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899980</id>
	<title>Diamonds are forever, but</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264438140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uranus is a girl's best friend.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uranus is a girl 's best friend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uranus is a girl's best friend.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899662</id>
	<title>Diamonds for all!</title>
	<author>sayfawa</author>
	<datestamp>1264435440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is AWESOME!. We'll all be rich! Rich as astronauts! Because, of course, the value that we humans put into diamonds are because of their inherent worth to our quality of life and has nothing to do with the fact that we're a bunch of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo\_(Gulliver's\_Travels)" title="wikipedia.org">yahoos.</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is AWESOME ! .
We 'll all be rich !
Rich as astronauts !
Because , of course , the value that we humans put into diamonds are because of their inherent worth to our quality of life and has nothing to do with the fact that we 're a bunch of yahoos .
[ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is AWESOME!.
We'll all be rich!
Rich as astronauts!
Because, of course, the value that we humans put into diamonds are because of their inherent worth to our quality of life and has nothing to do with the fact that we're a bunch of yahoos.
[wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30904240</id>
	<title>Re:Finally</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1264521060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or can tell them to go put their finger in Uranus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or can tell them to go put their finger in Uranus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or can tell them to go put their finger in Uranus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900006</id>
	<title>Re:Well, that's one way to get the space race movi</title>
	<author>lawpoop</author>
	<datestamp>1264438380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I heard that there's obscene amounts of unobtainium in one of the moons of Pandora, and it's yours for the taking!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard that there 's obscene amounts of unobtainium in one of the moons of Pandora , and it 's yours for the taking !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard that there's obscene amounts of unobtainium in one of the moons of Pandora, and it's yours for the taking!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899616</id>
	<title>Oh man</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1264435080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>My ass.  Not all that comes out of uranus is diamond.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My ass .
Not all that comes out of uranus is diamond .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My ass.
Not all that comes out of uranus is diamond.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30905066</id>
	<title>Re:Finally</title>
	<author>BlackSnake112</author>
	<datestamp>1264524120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think De Beers and the rest will ban anyone from going there to mine these diamonds. Or De Beers will say these off world or non Earth diamonds are not worth anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think De Beers and the rest will ban anyone from going there to mine these diamonds .
Or De Beers will say these off world or non Earth diamonds are not worth anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think De Beers and the rest will ban anyone from going there to mine these diamonds.
Or De Beers will say these off world or non Earth diamonds are not worth anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899586</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900422</id>
	<title>Unobtainium, anyone?</title>
	<author>Diablo1399</author>
	<datestamp>1264442280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Watch out for the Na'vi!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Watch out for the Na'vi !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watch out for the Na'vi!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902106</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Rollgunner</author>
	<datestamp>1264506960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Urmom</htmltext>
<tokenext>Urmom</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Urmom</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30908202</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264536180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>i thought it was renamed to poopshoot.com</htmltext>
<tokenext>i thought it was renamed to poopshoot.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i thought it was renamed to poopshoot.com</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900048</id>
	<title>Cheap diamonds? No way, MORE EXPENSIVE Diamonds.</title>
	<author>GNUALMAFUERTE</author>
	<datestamp>1264438740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think about this:</p><p>Diamond has no value in itself. It has technical applications, but there are already good substitutes, and for those applications (given the small amount needed, and the low quality of the diamonds involved) it's relatively cheap.<br>The value of Diamonds is artificially controlled: Scarcity, and symbolic value.</p><p>So, if normal Diamonds are expensive, Diamonds from space will be N times more expensive. They are actually MORE scarce, because They are fucking hard to bring back. Also, harvesting is more expensive (considering it were possible at all with current technology).</p><p>Also, there's is the "From space" thing. Currently, Synthetic diamonds are pretty cheap to produce, and they are legally diamonds. (I'm not talking about Zirconia, I'm talking about artificially produced diamonds). And still, people want real diamonds. Is there a difference between them? Nop, just the "This is scarce and comes from the core of the planet" thing.</p><p>So, Diamonds from outer space will be:</p><p>a) Fucking expensive<br>b) A great name for a band or B horror movie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think about this : Diamond has no value in itself .
It has technical applications , but there are already good substitutes , and for those applications ( given the small amount needed , and the low quality of the diamonds involved ) it 's relatively cheap.The value of Diamonds is artificially controlled : Scarcity , and symbolic value.So , if normal Diamonds are expensive , Diamonds from space will be N times more expensive .
They are actually MORE scarce , because They are fucking hard to bring back .
Also , harvesting is more expensive ( considering it were possible at all with current technology ) .Also , there 's is the " From space " thing .
Currently , Synthetic diamonds are pretty cheap to produce , and they are legally diamonds .
( I 'm not talking about Zirconia , I 'm talking about artificially produced diamonds ) .
And still , people want real diamonds .
Is there a difference between them ?
Nop , just the " This is scarce and comes from the core of the planet " thing.So , Diamonds from outer space will be : a ) Fucking expensiveb ) A great name for a band or B horror movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think about this:Diamond has no value in itself.
It has technical applications, but there are already good substitutes, and for those applications (given the small amount needed, and the low quality of the diamonds involved) it's relatively cheap.The value of Diamonds is artificially controlled: Scarcity, and symbolic value.So, if normal Diamonds are expensive, Diamonds from space will be N times more expensive.
They are actually MORE scarce, because They are fucking hard to bring back.
Also, harvesting is more expensive (considering it were possible at all with current technology).Also, there's is the "From space" thing.
Currently, Synthetic diamonds are pretty cheap to produce, and they are legally diamonds.
(I'm not talking about Zirconia, I'm talking about artificially produced diamonds).
And still, people want real diamonds.
Is there a difference between them?
Nop, just the "This is scarce and comes from the core of the planet" thing.So, Diamonds from outer space will be:a) Fucking expensiveb) A great name for a band or B horror movie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899700</id>
	<title>Life at 40 million atmospheres</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1264435800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hal Clement thought too small. Mesklin may be too low pressure for complex life.</p><p>One of the reasons earth is so amenable to life is that ice floats, so the oceans remain deep and liquid. The hydrocarbon oceans of Mesklin would be shallow and cold, a thin layer of liquid ammonia or methane over ices and clathrates. Thus they wouldn't serve as a moderator of temperature and reservoir of life the way Earths oceans have.</p><p>But if life based on crystalline carbon at millions of atmospheres is possible at all, it's all the more possible if the carbon-cycle resembles the water cycle on Earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hal Clement thought too small .
Mesklin may be too low pressure for complex life.One of the reasons earth is so amenable to life is that ice floats , so the oceans remain deep and liquid .
The hydrocarbon oceans of Mesklin would be shallow and cold , a thin layer of liquid ammonia or methane over ices and clathrates .
Thus they would n't serve as a moderator of temperature and reservoir of life the way Earths oceans have.But if life based on crystalline carbon at millions of atmospheres is possible at all , it 's all the more possible if the carbon-cycle resembles the water cycle on Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hal Clement thought too small.
Mesklin may be too low pressure for complex life.One of the reasons earth is so amenable to life is that ice floats, so the oceans remain deep and liquid.
The hydrocarbon oceans of Mesklin would be shallow and cold, a thin layer of liquid ammonia or methane over ices and clathrates.
Thus they wouldn't serve as a moderator of temperature and reservoir of life the way Earths oceans have.But if life based on crystalline carbon at millions of atmospheres is possible at all, it's all the more possible if the carbon-cycle resembles the water cycle on Earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902066</id>
	<title>Liquid Diamonds, Candy Canes, and</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264506540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>visions of lollipops dancing in my head.  What could be better than this??  Liquid Diamonds??  Are they hard as my hard water?</p><p>We must now give thanks who create this junk science and man made global warming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>visions of lollipops dancing in my head .
What could be better than this ? ?
Liquid Diamonds ? ?
Are they hard as my hard water ? We must now give thanks who create this junk science and man made global warming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>visions of lollipops dancing in my head.
What could be better than this??
Liquid Diamonds??
Are they hard as my hard water?We must now give thanks who create this junk science and man made global warming.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900402</id>
	<title>Re:For the dull knives in the drawer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264442100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"For the dull knives in the drawer"?</p><p>You arrogant fuck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" For the dull knives in the drawer " ? You arrogant fuck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"For the dull knives in the drawer"?You arrogant fuck.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899536</id>
	<title>motivation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264434240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>now I am convinced humans will create space ships, because nothing will get in the way of greed !!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>now I am convinced humans will create space ships , because nothing will get in the way of greed ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>now I am convinced humans will create space ships, because nothing will get in the way of greed !!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901442</id>
	<title>Re:Actually "Oceans of melted coal"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264497600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love the +5 insightful for what basically amounts to not RTFA.  Slashdot: where commenters and ppl who assign mod points alike cba to do anything but talk blindly about that which they don't fully understand.</p><p>gj world for this failure, I blame american schools</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love the + 5 insightful for what basically amounts to not RTFA .
Slashdot : where commenters and ppl who assign mod points alike cba to do anything but talk blindly about that which they do n't fully understand.gj world for this failure , I blame american schools</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love the +5 insightful for what basically amounts to not RTFA.
Slashdot: where commenters and ppl who assign mod points alike cba to do anything but talk blindly about that which they don't fully understand.gj world for this failure, I blame american schools</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899998</id>
	<title>In other news...</title>
	<author>Tracy Reed</author>
	<datestamp>1264438260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...DeBeers lobbies congress that the Space Program is a huge waste of money when there are real problems to be solved *here on earth*.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...DeBeers lobbies congress that the Space Program is a huge waste of money when there are real problems to be solved * here on earth * .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...DeBeers lobbies congress that the Space Program is a huge waste of money when there are real problems to be solved *here on earth*.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900328</id>
	<title>Diamond float, capillary action or other?</title>
	<author>icepick72</author>
	<datestamp>1264441560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When the scientists melted diamond and saw it resolidify and float on such a small scale, how can they assume diamond really floats on larger scales? Might not have capillary action come into play or some other force?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When the scientists melted diamond and saw it resolidify and float on such a small scale , how can they assume diamond really floats on larger scales ?
Might not have capillary action come into play or some other force ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When the scientists melted diamond and saw it resolidify and float on such a small scale, how can they assume diamond really floats on larger scales?
Might not have capillary action come into play or some other force?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30917630</id>
	<title>Discovery... i am disappoint</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1264609080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does Discovery let writing this bad on their web page?</p><p>"Oceans of liquid diamond, filled with solid diamond icebergs, could be floating on Neptune and Uranus, according to a recent article in the journal Nature Physics."</p><p>Dear Aspiring Journalists and Scientists,</p><p>Take more than English 101.  Use a the grammar check... even MS Word would have helped here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does Discovery let writing this bad on their web page ?
" Oceans of liquid diamond , filled with solid diamond icebergs , could be floating on Neptune and Uranus , according to a recent article in the journal Nature Physics .
" Dear Aspiring Journalists and Scientists,Take more than English 101 .
Use a the grammar check... even MS Word would have helped here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does Discovery let writing this bad on their web page?
"Oceans of liquid diamond, filled with solid diamond icebergs, could be floating on Neptune and Uranus, according to a recent article in the journal Nature Physics.
"Dear Aspiring Journalists and Scientists,Take more than English 101.
Use a the grammar check... even MS Word would have helped here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901378</id>
	<title>Re:mOarbligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264496760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What did they rename it to?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What did they rename it to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What did they rename it to?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899894</id>
	<title>Re:Well, that's one way to get the space race movi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264437240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm waiting for Unobtainium.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for Unobtainium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for Unobtainium.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899694</id>
	<title>as for life...</title>
	<author>cheap.computer</author>
	<datestamp>1264435740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>yeah also... klingons are usually found on uranus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah also... klingons are usually found on uranus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah also... klingons are usually found on uranus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30908738</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264538580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what do they call it now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what do they call it now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what do they call it now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902936</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Bender Unit 22</author>
	<datestamp>1264515240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yourectum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yourectum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yourectum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901872</id>
	<title>Impossible to get down and then back up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264504140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So-<br>1.lets just blow the place up.<br>Or, more reasonably<br>2.drop bombs big enough to kick debris into space to be scooped up.<br>What could possibly go wrong!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So-1.lets just blow the place up.Or , more reasonably2.drop bombs big enough to kick debris into space to be scooped up.What could possibly go wrong !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So-1.lets just blow the place up.Or, more reasonably2.drop bombs big enough to kick debris into space to be scooped up.What could possibly go wrong!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900814</id>
	<title>Re:Well, that's one way to get the space race movi</title>
	<author>uvajed\_ekil</author>
	<datestamp>1264446600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I'd like to let everyone know that Mars is full of gold just under the crust, and every planet around Proxima Centauri is rich with uranium.</i> <br> <br>
That's quite intriguing, and something to consider, although gold might not be worth going to Mars for if there were a whole planet of it there. And I'd rather just see more news about Uranus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to let everyone know that Mars is full of gold just under the crust , and every planet around Proxima Centauri is rich with uranium .
That 's quite intriguing , and something to consider , although gold might not be worth going to Mars for if there were a whole planet of it there .
And I 'd rather just see more news about Uranus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to let everyone know that Mars is full of gold just under the crust, and every planet around Proxima Centauri is rich with uranium.
That's quite intriguing, and something to consider, although gold might not be worth going to Mars for if there were a whole planet of it there.
And I'd rather just see more news about Uranus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30907188</id>
	<title>Re:For the dull knives in the drawer</title>
	<author>mdielmann</author>
	<datestamp>1264532100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>detailed research into the melting point of diamond found it behaves like water during melting and freezing -- with its solid form floating on the liquid</i></p><p>I only point this out because you would be surprised at how many human beings don't know this...</p></div><p>And then they go make <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1046173/" title="imdb.com">movies</a> [imdb.com]. "Blow the ice cap!"  I was just stunned when they said that.  Even Wile E. Coyote knew better than to leave the helium balloons attached to his anvils.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>detailed research into the melting point of diamond found it behaves like water during melting and freezing -- with its solid form floating on the liquidI only point this out because you would be surprised at how many human beings do n't know this...And then they go make movies [ imdb.com ] .
" Blow the ice cap !
" I was just stunned when they said that .
Even Wile E. Coyote knew better than to leave the helium balloons attached to his anvils .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> detailed research into the melting point of diamond found it behaves like water during melting and freezing -- with its solid form floating on the liquidI only point this out because you would be surprised at how many human beings don't know this...And then they go make movies [imdb.com].
"Blow the ice cap!
"  I was just stunned when they said that.
Even Wile E. Coyote knew better than to leave the helium balloons attached to his anvils.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30906492</id>
	<title>Re:Well, that's one way to get the space race movi</title>
	<author>2obvious4u</author>
	<datestamp>1264529220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm waiting for Gundanium.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for Gundanium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for Gundanium.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899816</id>
	<title>Re:pressure off by a magnitude</title>
	<author>v1</author>
	<datestamp>1264436760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1 atm = about 100 kilopascals</p><p>according to <a href="http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1999/PavelKhazron.shtml" title="hypertextbook.com">http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1999/PavelKhazron.shtml</a> [hypertextbook.com], <i>At the centre, the pressure is about 380GPa (380,000,000,000pascal)</i></p><p>so pressure at earth's center is about 3.8 million atmospheres.  Quite a bit shy of 40.  But that's assuming the same radius and density, which are probably quite a bit off.  But not by <i>that much</i> I don't think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 atm = about 100 kilopascalsaccording to http : //hypertextbook.com/facts/1999/PavelKhazron.shtml [ hypertextbook.com ] , At the centre , the pressure is about 380GPa ( 380,000,000,000pascal ) so pressure at earth 's center is about 3.8 million atmospheres .
Quite a bit shy of 40 .
But that 's assuming the same radius and density , which are probably quite a bit off .
But not by that much I do n't think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1 atm = about 100 kilopascalsaccording to http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1999/PavelKhazron.shtml [hypertextbook.com], At the centre, the pressure is about 380GPa (380,000,000,000pascal)so pressure at earth's center is about 3.8 million atmospheres.
Quite a bit shy of 40.
But that's assuming the same radius and density, which are probably quite a bit off.
But not by that much I don't think.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901022</id>
	<title>Questions...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264449300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, so maybe I'm just an idiot but I have some serious questions about this.</p><p>First of all the article mentions that </p><p><div class="quote"><p> an oddity they both share: unlike Earth, they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles."</p></div><p>Ummm, well, actually, Earth's magnetic poles do NOT match up with it's rotational axis (geographic poles they called it). So it should have said, LIKE earth...</p><p>Second, diamonds are carbon in a crystalline structure. I have a hard time believing that if you freeze them, they change at all.... since they are already in a crystalline form they would actually have to unassemble and reassemble into a different, less dense, crystalline structure. I suppose it might be possible, but I'd have to see an actual experiment which reproduces that effect to believe it.</p><p>Third, (see point 2), I guess you could "melt" diamonds, what you'd end up with is... melted carbon, not melted "diamond", since "diamond" is just a fancy name for that form of carbon.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , so maybe I 'm just an idiot but I have some serious questions about this.First of all the article mentions that an oddity they both share : unlike Earth , they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles .
" Ummm , well , actually , Earth 's magnetic poles do NOT match up with it 's rotational axis ( geographic poles they called it ) .
So it should have said , LIKE earth...Second , diamonds are carbon in a crystalline structure .
I have a hard time believing that if you freeze them , they change at all.... since they are already in a crystalline form they would actually have to unassemble and reassemble into a different , less dense , crystalline structure .
I suppose it might be possible , but I 'd have to see an actual experiment which reproduces that effect to believe it.Third , ( see point 2 ) , I guess you could " melt " diamonds , what you 'd end up with is... melted carbon , not melted " diamond " , since " diamond " is just a fancy name for that form of carbon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, so maybe I'm just an idiot but I have some serious questions about this.First of all the article mentions that  an oddity they both share: unlike Earth, they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles.
"Ummm, well, actually, Earth's magnetic poles do NOT match up with it's rotational axis (geographic poles they called it).
So it should have said, LIKE earth...Second, diamonds are carbon in a crystalline structure.
I have a hard time believing that if you freeze them, they change at all.... since they are already in a crystalline form they would actually have to unassemble and reassemble into a different, less dense, crystalline structure.
I suppose it might be possible, but I'd have to see an actual experiment which reproduces that effect to believe it.Third, (see point 2), I guess you could "melt" diamonds, what you'd end up with is... melted carbon, not melted "diamond", since "diamond" is just a fancy name for that form of carbon.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901798</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264502940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The astronomers renamed it? Stuff them.</p><p>The rest of us still call it Uranus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The astronomers renamed it ?
Stuff them.The rest of us still call it Uranus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The astronomers renamed it?
Stuff them.The rest of us still call it Uranus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901684</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264501200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>So now<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers can tell their "girlfriends" that if you want a diamond, you're free to look for one in Uranus?</p></div><p>I'm sorry langelgjm but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all...</p></div><p>Urectum will ive on forever!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So now /.ers can tell their " girlfriends " that if you want a diamond , you 're free to look for one in Uranus ? I 'm sorry langelgjm but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all...Urectum will ive on forever !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now /.ers can tell their "girlfriends" that if you want a diamond, you're free to look for one in Uranus?I'm sorry langelgjm but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all...Urectum will ive on forever!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900930</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>rockNme2349</author>
	<datestamp>1264448460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh. What's it called now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh .
What 's it called now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh.
What's it called now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474</id>
	<title>Finally</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264433760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>So now<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers can tell their "girlfriends" that if you want a diamond, you're free to look for one in Uranus?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So now /.ers can tell their " girlfriends " that if you want a diamond , you 're free to look for one in Uranus ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now /.ers can tell their "girlfriends" that if you want a diamond, you're free to look for one in Uranus?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899674</id>
	<title>Just think of the Africans!</title>
	<author>AssTard</author>
	<datestamp>1264435560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just think of how many oppressed Africans it took to make that, what?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just think of how many oppressed Africans it took to make that , what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just think of how many oppressed Africans it took to make that, what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899778</id>
	<title>Watch Out!  I saw this on Doctor Who!</title>
	<author>Zordak</author>
	<datestamp>1264436520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Doctor already knew this.  But watch out.  What they don't mention is that planets with diamond waterfalls also apparently have strange, ethereal aliens that like to play "copycat" and have a thing for possessing lesbian women.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Doctor already knew this .
But watch out .
What they do n't mention is that planets with diamond waterfalls also apparently have strange , ethereal aliens that like to play " copycat " and have a thing for possessing lesbian women .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Doctor already knew this.
But watch out.
What they don't mention is that planets with diamond waterfalls also apparently have strange, ethereal aliens that like to play "copycat" and have a thing for possessing lesbian women.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30905804</id>
	<title>Re:Finally</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264526700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guy : My darling, would you marry me?</p><p>Girl : But love where is my ring with my huge diamond?</p><p>Guy : Well, If I could just first get into Uranus then I'd surely give you the largest diamond-ring available to man<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guy : My darling , would you marry me ? Girl : But love where is my ring with my huge diamond ? Guy : Well , If I could just first get into Uranus then I 'd surely give you the largest diamond-ring available to man .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guy : My darling, would you marry me?Girl : But love where is my ring with my huge diamond?Guy : Well, If I could just first get into Uranus then I'd surely give you the largest diamond-ring available to man ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902374</id>
	<title>Re:For the dull knives in the drawer</title>
	<author>Alphathon</author>
	<datestamp>1264510380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wondered the same thing. If the guy before me is correct, it would seem that it is not molten diamond but simply molten carbon which turns back into diamond when frozen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wondered the same thing .
If the guy before me is correct , it would seem that it is not molten diamond but simply molten carbon which turns back into diamond when frozen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wondered the same thing.
If the guy before me is correct, it would seem that it is not molten diamond but simply molten carbon which turns back into diamond when frozen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30903114</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1264516260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What'd they rename it to, Urectum ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 'd they rename it to , Urectum ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What'd they rename it to, Urectum ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899722</id>
	<title>Re:These aren't valuable</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1264436040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The cost of something depends on quantity and demand/supply.  So if it took 3,000$/kg to mine these diamonds from these gas giants, it wouldn't be profitable to mine enough of them to decrease the overall cost of diamonds below this value.  If the supply of Diamond crashes to the point where the demand pushes up the cost of Diamonds enough that mining them from these gas giants is profitable then the price would still be at least what it cost to mine them from these planets.  The only way that diamond values would crash would be if mining them were dirt cheap, which is very very unlikely.  Now from the point of view of Uranus and Neptune, these Diamonds aren't just lying around, they're hard to get at which makes them quite rare and therefore precious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The cost of something depends on quantity and demand/supply .
So if it took 3,000 $ /kg to mine these diamonds from these gas giants , it would n't be profitable to mine enough of them to decrease the overall cost of diamonds below this value .
If the supply of Diamond crashes to the point where the demand pushes up the cost of Diamonds enough that mining them from these gas giants is profitable then the price would still be at least what it cost to mine them from these planets .
The only way that diamond values would crash would be if mining them were dirt cheap , which is very very unlikely .
Now from the point of view of Uranus and Neptune , these Diamonds are n't just lying around , they 're hard to get at which makes them quite rare and therefore precious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The cost of something depends on quantity and demand/supply.
So if it took 3,000$/kg to mine these diamonds from these gas giants, it wouldn't be profitable to mine enough of them to decrease the overall cost of diamonds below this value.
If the supply of Diamond crashes to the point where the demand pushes up the cost of Diamonds enough that mining them from these gas giants is profitable then the price would still be at least what it cost to mine them from these planets.
The only way that diamond values would crash would be if mining them were dirt cheap, which is very very unlikely.
Now from the point of view of Uranus and Neptune, these Diamonds aren't just lying around, they're hard to get at which makes them quite rare and therefore precious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899730</id>
	<title>Except for the thing that covers 70+\% of the earth</title>
	<author>Fallen Kell</author>
	<datestamp>1264436100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... no text needed, if you can't figure it out then go have a drink...</htmltext>
<tokenext>... no text needed , if you ca n't figure it out then go have a drink.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... no text needed, if you can't figure it out then go have a drink...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30918648</id>
	<title>Hahahahahaha</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264612740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just dropped by to read the funny comments on Uranus. Well done people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just dropped by to read the funny comments on Uranus .
Well done people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just dropped by to read the funny comments on Uranus.
Well done people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899820</id>
	<title>It's a wonderful planet</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1264436820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's nothing. I know of a planet that is made out of candy and chocolate and ponies. Just step into my vehicle, and I'll show it to you, little girl.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's nothing .
I know of a planet that is made out of candy and chocolate and ponies .
Just step into my vehicle , and I 'll show it to you , little girl .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's nothing.
I know of a planet that is made out of candy and chocolate and ponies.
Just step into my vehicle, and I'll show it to you, little girl.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899974</id>
	<title>A C Clarke</title>
	<author>rossdee</author>
	<datestamp>1264438140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it was first mentioned in the book 2010 that Jupiter may have a core of diamond, nd later in the book 2061 an astronomer finds a piece of it (after Jupiter is blown up into a star by the monolith) on Europa.<br>So it would not be surprising to find diamond at the core of other gas giants. But so what, we could make diamond here on earth for less energy cost than digging it out of a gas giant and bringing it back to earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it was first mentioned in the book 2010 that Jupiter may have a core of diamond , nd later in the book 2061 an astronomer finds a piece of it ( after Jupiter is blown up into a star by the monolith ) on Europa.So it would not be surprising to find diamond at the core of other gas giants .
But so what , we could make diamond here on earth for less energy cost than digging it out of a gas giant and bringing it back to earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it was first mentioned in the book 2010 that Jupiter may have a core of diamond, nd later in the book 2061 an astronomer finds a piece of it (after Jupiter is blown up into a star by the monolith) on Europa.So it would not be surprising to find diamond at the core of other gas giants.
But so what, we could make diamond here on earth for less energy cost than digging it out of a gas giant and bringing it back to earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534</id>
	<title>For the dull knives in the drawer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264434180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>detailed research into the melting point of diamond found it behaves like water during melting and freezing -- with its solid form floating on the liquid</i> <br> <br>I only point this out because you would be surprised at how many human beings don't know this, but for it to float to the top, that means its frozen state is less dense, hence expands, when freezes. Almost nothing else does this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>detailed research into the melting point of diamond found it behaves like water during melting and freezing -- with its solid form floating on the liquid I only point this out because you would be surprised at how many human beings do n't know this , but for it to float to the top , that means its frozen state is less dense , hence expands , when freezes .
Almost nothing else does this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>detailed research into the melting point of diamond found it behaves like water during melting and freezing -- with its solid form floating on the liquid  I only point this out because you would be surprised at how many human beings don't know this, but for it to float to the top, that means its frozen state is less dense, hence expands, when freezes.
Almost nothing else does this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900400</id>
	<title>Re:Except for the thing that covers 70+\% of the ea</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1264442040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"... no text needed, if you can't figure it out then go have a drink.."</i>
<br> <br>
I respectfully suggest you stop drinking and re-read his post.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ... no text needed , if you ca n't figure it out then go have a drink.. " I respectfully suggest you stop drinking and re-read his post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"... no text needed, if you can't figure it out then go have a drink.."
 
I respectfully suggest you stop drinking and re-read his post.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900546</id>
	<title>Girlfriends</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264443480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was going to reply that Slashdotters don't have girlfriends, but you had to go ahead and put quotation marks around it.</p><p>You have won <i>this</i> time langeljgm!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to reply that Slashdotters do n't have girlfriends , but you had to go ahead and put quotation marks around it.You have won this time langeljgm ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to reply that Slashdotters don't have girlfriends, but you had to go ahead and put quotation marks around it.You have won this time langeljgm!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899996</id>
	<title>Re:These aren't valuable</title>
	<author>Shikaku</author>
	<datestamp>1264438260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Diamond is the hardest metal known to man!  Imagine a safehouse or a car made of the stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Diamond is the hardest metal known to man !
Imagine a safehouse or a car made of the stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Diamond is the hardest metal known to man!
Imagine a safehouse or a car made of the stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899918</id>
	<title>Avatar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264437540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So does this mean we get to land there, mine the gems, and get our asses kicked by the locals?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So does this mean we get to land there , mine the gems , and get our asses kicked by the locals ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So does this mean we get to land there, mine the gems, and get our asses kicked by the locals?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900012</id>
	<title>Re:Finally</title>
	<author>theMoleofProduction</author>
	<datestamp>1264438380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So now<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers can tell their "girlfriends" that if you want a diamond, you're free to look for one in Uranus?</p></div><p>Worth a shot...<br>

"Hey, baby! Answer me this: What's the <i>hardest</i> thing known to man, and you can find lots of it <i>way</i> up in Uranus?"<br> <br>

<i>*oof*</i><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and now I have a black eye to explain to my boss. Damn you, science!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So now /.ers can tell their " girlfriends " that if you want a diamond , you 're free to look for one in Uranus ? Worth a shot.. . " Hey , baby !
Answer me this : What 's the hardest thing known to man , and you can find lots of it way up in Uranus ?
" * oof * ...and now I have a black eye to explain to my boss .
Damn you , science !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now /.ers can tell their "girlfriends" that if you want a diamond, you're free to look for one in Uranus?Worth a shot...

"Hey, baby!
Answer me this: What's the hardest thing known to man, and you can find lots of it way up in Uranus?
" 

*oof* ...and now I have a black eye to explain to my boss.
Damn you, science!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899500</id>
	<title>obligatory uranus joke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264433940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Pardon my French, but Cameron is so tight that if you stuck a lump of coal up his ass, in two weeks you'd have a diamond."</p></div><p> -- Ferris Bueller</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Pardon my French , but Cameron is so tight that if you stuck a lump of coal up his ass , in two weeks you 'd have a diamond .
" -- Ferris Bueller</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Pardon my French, but Cameron is so tight that if you stuck a lump of coal up his ass, in two weeks you'd have a diamond.
" -- Ferris Bueller
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899718</id>
	<title>Shhhh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264436040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let DeBeers spend all their money getting to Uranus first! You're ruining the plan!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let DeBeers spend all their money getting to Uranus first !
You 're ruining the plan !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let DeBeers spend all their money getting to Uranus first!
You're ruining the plan!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900802</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264446240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only to rename it into something much worse... Urectum</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only to rename it into something much worse... Urectum</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only to rename it into something much worse... Urectum</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899612</id>
	<title>Re:For the dull knives in the drawer</title>
	<author>Cyrano de Maniac</author>
	<datestamp>1264435020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's at least one notable substance that shares this property: Water.  That's why it forms ice on the top surface rather than along the bottom/sides of the container (be that container a bucket, a river, or a lake).  This very fact is instrumental to life on our little globe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's at least one notable substance that shares this property : Water .
That 's why it forms ice on the top surface rather than along the bottom/sides of the container ( be that container a bucket , a river , or a lake ) .
This very fact is instrumental to life on our little globe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's at least one notable substance that shares this property: Water.
That's why it forms ice on the top surface rather than along the bottom/sides of the container (be that container a bucket, a river, or a lake).
This very fact is instrumental to life on our little globe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899776</id>
	<title>Re:Actually "Oceans of melted coal"</title>
	<author>cupantae</author>
	<datestamp>1264436460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What? "Insightful"?<br>So viking80 and everyone that modded viking80 didn't think to RTFA. It sets about answering this question right from the offset.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
" Insightful " ? So viking80 and everyone that modded viking80 did n't think to RTFA .
It sets about answering this question right from the offset .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
"Insightful"?So viking80 and everyone that modded viking80 didn't think to RTFA.
It sets about answering this question right from the offset.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30904812</id>
	<title>Semi-precious diamonds</title>
	<author>GooberToo</author>
	<datestamp>1264522980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From Wikipedia:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The traditional classification in the West, which goes back to the Ancient Greeks, begins with a distinction between precious and semi-precious stones; similar distinctions are made in other cultures. The precious stones are diamond, ruby, emerald and sapphire, with all other gemstones being semi-precious.[2] This distinction is unscientific and reflects the rarity of the respective stones in ancient times</p></div><p>That means if diamonds were to be classified today, they would be downgraded from "precious" to "semi-precious". Diamonds are not rare in the least. In fact, all planets are likely to have diamonds. All planets with geological activity, present or in the past, are likely to have diamonds on or near their surface.</p><p>I wish people would understand that the diamond market is completely artificially manipulated. Only industrial diamonds are mostly influenced by basic market supply and demand - but not completely. Diamonds which are used as precious stones have their supply tightly controlled so as to create artificial scarcity. Control on diamonds are so tightly controlled, in some countries (Africa), picking up a diamond without government permission (e.g. DeBeers) may result in execution on the spot. Think about that. If diamonds were so scarce, why would then need to specifically make legal provisions to allow for an extremely rare event of discovering a natural, rough diamond on the ground? Unless of course, they're not rare at all and diamonds really are commonly found simply laying on the ground. And people face execution because an unfeathered supply of diamonds to the market would crash their value over night.</p><p>There are few things in the modern times which have caused more pain, misery, death, and mass slavery than Diamonds and DeBeers. But to be clear, DeBeers is not alone here.</p><p>Few diamonds in the world, contrary to the conflict free marketing, are truly "blood-free", as as much as 60\% of the "conflict free" diamonds are actually smuggled from "conflict zones". In other words, over half of every diamond you see in stores is there because of someone's murder, slavery (including children), and illegal imprisonment, torture, so on and so on.</p><p>So remember nothing says I love you like blood, summary executions, and slavery. Its not just a moto, its fact.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From Wikipedia : The traditional classification in the West , which goes back to the Ancient Greeks , begins with a distinction between precious and semi-precious stones ; similar distinctions are made in other cultures .
The precious stones are diamond , ruby , emerald and sapphire , with all other gemstones being semi-precious .
[ 2 ] This distinction is unscientific and reflects the rarity of the respective stones in ancient timesThat means if diamonds were to be classified today , they would be downgraded from " precious " to " semi-precious " .
Diamonds are not rare in the least .
In fact , all planets are likely to have diamonds .
All planets with geological activity , present or in the past , are likely to have diamonds on or near their surface.I wish people would understand that the diamond market is completely artificially manipulated .
Only industrial diamonds are mostly influenced by basic market supply and demand - but not completely .
Diamonds which are used as precious stones have their supply tightly controlled so as to create artificial scarcity .
Control on diamonds are so tightly controlled , in some countries ( Africa ) , picking up a diamond without government permission ( e.g .
DeBeers ) may result in execution on the spot .
Think about that .
If diamonds were so scarce , why would then need to specifically make legal provisions to allow for an extremely rare event of discovering a natural , rough diamond on the ground ?
Unless of course , they 're not rare at all and diamonds really are commonly found simply laying on the ground .
And people face execution because an unfeathered supply of diamonds to the market would crash their value over night.There are few things in the modern times which have caused more pain , misery , death , and mass slavery than Diamonds and DeBeers .
But to be clear , DeBeers is not alone here.Few diamonds in the world , contrary to the conflict free marketing , are truly " blood-free " , as as much as 60 \ % of the " conflict free " diamonds are actually smuggled from " conflict zones " .
In other words , over half of every diamond you see in stores is there because of someone 's murder , slavery ( including children ) , and illegal imprisonment , torture , so on and so on.So remember nothing says I love you like blood , summary executions , and slavery .
Its not just a moto , its fact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From Wikipedia:The traditional classification in the West, which goes back to the Ancient Greeks, begins with a distinction between precious and semi-precious stones; similar distinctions are made in other cultures.
The precious stones are diamond, ruby, emerald and sapphire, with all other gemstones being semi-precious.
[2] This distinction is unscientific and reflects the rarity of the respective stones in ancient timesThat means if diamonds were to be classified today, they would be downgraded from "precious" to "semi-precious".
Diamonds are not rare in the least.
In fact, all planets are likely to have diamonds.
All planets with geological activity, present or in the past, are likely to have diamonds on or near their surface.I wish people would understand that the diamond market is completely artificially manipulated.
Only industrial diamonds are mostly influenced by basic market supply and demand - but not completely.
Diamonds which are used as precious stones have their supply tightly controlled so as to create artificial scarcity.
Control on diamonds are so tightly controlled, in some countries (Africa), picking up a diamond without government permission (e.g.
DeBeers) may result in execution on the spot.
Think about that.
If diamonds were so scarce, why would then need to specifically make legal provisions to allow for an extremely rare event of discovering a natural, rough diamond on the ground?
Unless of course, they're not rare at all and diamonds really are commonly found simply laying on the ground.
And people face execution because an unfeathered supply of diamonds to the market would crash their value over night.There are few things in the modern times which have caused more pain, misery, death, and mass slavery than Diamonds and DeBeers.
But to be clear, DeBeers is not alone here.Few diamonds in the world, contrary to the conflict free marketing, are truly "blood-free", as as much as 60\% of the "conflict free" diamonds are actually smuggled from "conflict zones".
In other words, over half of every diamond you see in stores is there because of someone's murder, slavery (including children), and illegal imprisonment, torture, so on and so on.So remember nothing says I love you like blood, summary executions, and slavery.
Its not just a moto, its fact.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899752</id>
	<title>Diamonds aren't rare.</title>
	<author>cprocjr</author>
	<datestamp>1264436340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I really don't find this all that surprising, diamonds aren't even that rare on earth. The only reason they are so expensive is because diamond companies buy them all up and only put very few on the market.
However, I have to admit, an iceberg of diamonds would look pretty darn awesome!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really do n't find this all that surprising , diamonds are n't even that rare on earth .
The only reason they are so expensive is because diamond companies buy them all up and only put very few on the market .
However , I have to admit , an iceberg of diamonds would look pretty darn awesome !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really don't find this all that surprising, diamonds aren't even that rare on earth.
The only reason they are so expensive is because diamond companies buy them all up and only put very few on the market.
However, I have to admit, an iceberg of diamonds would look pretty darn awesome!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900578</id>
	<title>Re:Finally</title>
	<author>p0r0ng</author>
	<datestamp>1264443780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought the name was changed to URECTUM - to end certain jokes?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the name was changed to URECTUM - to end certain jokes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the name was changed to URECTUM - to end certain jokes?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899888</id>
	<title>Utopia Project</title>
	<author>Gothmolly</author>
	<datestamp>1264437180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the SKIES that are made of diamonds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the SKIES that are made of diamonds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the SKIES that are made of diamonds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30903968</id>
	<title>NASA loses budget-chains..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264520100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Co-incidentally in the same press conference as announcing the upcoming Uranus Mission, NASA has predicted profits for the first time ever in it's history<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... profits of over 9000\%</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Co-incidentally in the same press conference as announcing the upcoming Uranus Mission , NASA has predicted profits for the first time ever in it 's history ... profits of over 9000 \ %</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Co-incidentally in the same press conference as announcing the upcoming Uranus Mission, NASA has predicted profits for the first time ever in it's history ... profits of over 9000\%</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902026</id>
	<title>Re:For the dull knives in the drawer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264506060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> diamondbergs</p> </div><p>Where were the diamondbergs for Titanic?!<br>Regular icebergs aren't classy enough damn it!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>diamondbergs Where were the diamondbergs for Titanic ?
! Regular icebergs are n't classy enough damn it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> diamondbergs Where were the diamondbergs for Titanic?
!Regular icebergs aren't classy enough damn it!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899936</id>
	<title>an ocean of diamonds?</title>
	<author>hldn</author>
	<datestamp>1264437780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"An ocean of diamonds? In <i>my</i> anus?"</p><p>It's more likely than you think.<br>FREE PC CHECK!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" An ocean of diamonds ?
In my anus ?
" It 's more likely than you think.FREE PC CHECK !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"An ocean of diamonds?
In my anus?
"It's more likely than you think.FREE PC CHECK!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899972</id>
	<title>BLING BLING!!!</title>
	<author>Datamonstar</author>
	<datestamp>1264438080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We're going to see rappers really getting into astronomy and space travel now. Only in an attempt to be the first rapper with a diamond pool in one of his videos. Or maybe have a tap with running diamonds in his mansion to one up Dave Chappelle sprinkling diamonds on his dinosaur eggs. Once 106 &amp; Park gets involved in space aeronautics we may actually start seeing videos like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfVXPdiBWRM" title="youtube.com">this</a> [youtube.com]. You know, to get the kids involved.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're going to see rappers really getting into astronomy and space travel now .
Only in an attempt to be the first rapper with a diamond pool in one of his videos .
Or maybe have a tap with running diamonds in his mansion to one up Dave Chappelle sprinkling diamonds on his dinosaur eggs .
Once 106 &amp; Park gets involved in space aeronautics we may actually start seeing videos like this [ youtube.com ] .
You know , to get the kids involved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're going to see rappers really getting into astronomy and space travel now.
Only in an attempt to be the first rapper with a diamond pool in one of his videos.
Or maybe have a tap with running diamonds in his mansion to one up Dave Chappelle sprinkling diamonds on his dinosaur eggs.
Once 106 &amp; Park gets involved in space aeronautics we may actually start seeing videos like this [youtube.com].
You know, to get the kids involved.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899742</id>
	<title>Oh, NASA</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1264436220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was a very clever trick. NASA won't need to worry about getting the funding to build long-range spacecraft anymore now. Devious...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was a very clever trick .
NASA wo n't need to worry about getting the funding to build long-range spacecraft anymore now .
Devious.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was a very clever trick.
NASA won't need to worry about getting the funding to build long-range spacecraft anymore now.
Devious...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899832</id>
	<title>why worry about diamonds....</title>
	<author>ushere</author>
	<datestamp>1264436820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>when we have a huge chunk of cheese hanging right above us?</p><p>such a dumb discussion. we can't even begin to think of getting anyone on the moon (again?), let alone up uranus....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>when we have a huge chunk of cheese hanging right above us ? such a dumb discussion .
we ca n't even begin to think of getting anyone on the moon ( again ?
) , let alone up uranus... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when we have a huge chunk of cheese hanging right above us?such a dumb discussion.
we can't even begin to think of getting anyone on the moon (again?
), let alone up uranus....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30903874</id>
	<title>by Daniel de Souza Telles</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264519680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry dude. There isn't oceans of diamonds, It's just a carbon ocean. When it cold, probally it will become graphite. Diamonds needs pressure. Think for a moment, why we dont melt small diamons into big ones?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry dude .
There is n't oceans of diamonds , It 's just a carbon ocean .
When it cold , probally it will become graphite .
Diamonds needs pressure .
Think for a moment , why we dont melt small diamons into big ones ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry dude.
There isn't oceans of diamonds, It's just a carbon ocean.
When it cold, probally it will become graphite.
Diamonds needs pressure.
Think for a moment, why we dont melt small diamons into big ones?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>saxoholic</author>
	<datestamp>1264438200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So now<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers can tell their "girlfriends" that if you want a diamond, you're free to look for one in Uranus?</p></div><p>I'm sorry langelgjm but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So now /.ers can tell their " girlfriends " that if you want a diamond , you 're free to look for one in Uranus ? I 'm sorry langelgjm but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now /.ers can tell their "girlfriends" that if you want a diamond, you're free to look for one in Uranus?I'm sorry langelgjm but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900310</id>
	<title>Oblig</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264441500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://science.howstuffworks.com/diamond5.htm" title="howstuffworks.com" rel="nofollow">De Beers Marketing</a> [howstuffworks.com]</p><p>1. A diamond is forever.<br>2. A diamond is a family heirloom.<br>3. If he truly loves you, he would buy a diamond that costs him 2 months' salary.</p><p>Pure genius.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>De Beers Marketing [ howstuffworks.com ] 1 .
A diamond is forever.2 .
A diamond is a family heirloom.3 .
If he truly loves you , he would buy a diamond that costs him 2 months ' salary.Pure genius .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>De Beers Marketing [howstuffworks.com]1.
A diamond is forever.2.
A diamond is a family heirloom.3.
If he truly loves you, he would buy a diamond that costs him 2 months' salary.Pure genius.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900146</id>
	<title>Time to change the slogan?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264439940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Uranus is a girl's best friend.

Errr... maybe not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uranus is a girl 's best friend .
Errr... maybe not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uranus is a girl's best friend.
Errr... maybe not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902232</id>
	<title>Not diamonds.... di-lithium</title>
	<author>dkh2</author>
	<datestamp>1264508640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There... somebody had to say it. I know all you Start Trek loving geeks out there were thinking it. Now go back to your "who'd you rather" debate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There... somebody had to say it .
I know all you Start Trek loving geeks out there were thinking it .
Now go back to your " who 'd you rather " debate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There... somebody had to say it.
I know all you Start Trek loving geeks out there were thinking it.
Now go back to your "who'd you rather" debate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899690</id>
	<title>liquid crystals?</title>
	<author>cheebie</author>
	<datestamp>1264435740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, how is liquid diamond different from liquid graphite or liquid carbon?  It's my understanding that the only difference between graphite and diamond is that the crystalline structure is 2-d in graphite and 3-d in diamond.</p><p>Is it just the fact that at those temperatures and pressures the natural crystals formed from the liquid are diamond?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , how is liquid diamond different from liquid graphite or liquid carbon ?
It 's my understanding that the only difference between graphite and diamond is that the crystalline structure is 2-d in graphite and 3-d in diamond.Is it just the fact that at those temperatures and pressures the natural crystals formed from the liquid are diamond ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, how is liquid diamond different from liquid graphite or liquid carbon?
It's my understanding that the only difference between graphite and diamond is that the crystalline structure is 2-d in graphite and 3-d in diamond.Is it just the fact that at those temperatures and pressures the natural crystals formed from the liquid are diamond?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899916</id>
	<title>I wonder...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264437480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could you call them "blood diamonds" if an astronaut dies in the process of getting some?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could you call them " blood diamonds " if an astronaut dies in the process of getting some ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could you call them "blood diamonds" if an astronaut dies in the process of getting some?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900810</id>
	<title>Re:Only one problem</title>
	<author>hutkey</author>
	<datestamp>1264446540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's very hard to believe<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers have a girlfriend.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's very hard to believe /.ers have a girlfriend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's very hard to believe /.ers have a girlfriend.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902150</id>
	<title>She knew!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264507500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tori Amos - Liquid Diamonds</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tori Amos - Liquid Diamonds</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tori Amos - Liquid Diamonds</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899620</id>
	<title>Re:For the dull knives in the drawer</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1264435140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You beat me to it, I also find this the most interesting part of the TFA. I  wonder if this unusual property is more or less pronunced in carbon than it is in water, ie: do the diamondbergs float higher or lower in the liquid carbon than icebergs do in liquid water?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You beat me to it , I also find this the most interesting part of the TFA .
I wonder if this unusual property is more or less pronunced in carbon than it is in water , ie : do the diamondbergs float higher or lower in the liquid carbon than icebergs do in liquid water ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You beat me to it, I also find this the most interesting part of the TFA.
I  wonder if this unusual property is more or less pronunced in carbon than it is in water, ie: do the diamondbergs float higher or lower in the liquid carbon than icebergs do in liquid water?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901900</id>
	<title>Re:Article is clearly misinformed</title>
	<author>ArsenneLupin</author>
	<datestamp>1264504740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're just talking out of Uranus, and De Beers is talking out of their's. They've got a business to protect, after all!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're just talking out of Uranus , and De Beers is talking out of their 's .
They 've got a business to protect , after all !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're just talking out of Uranus, and De Beers is talking out of their's.
They've got a business to protect, after all!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902290</id>
	<title>Re:Well, that's one way to get the space race movi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264509420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You'll never get it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll never get it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll never get it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900024</id>
	<title>What's Unlike Like?</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1264438560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...unlike Earth, they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles."</p><p>Unlike Earth, neither does Earth. The Earth's south magnetic pole is presently about 25.6 degrees from the south pole. Granted, that's not 60 degrees, but apparently neither are theirs since according to TFA the magnetic poles on Uranus and Neptune "can be up to 60 degrees off the north-south axis", it they were, there's be no reason to say "can be".</p><p>There's no note regarding secondary poles on the giant planets like on the sun, but according the Oersted and Magsat satellite data and article in Nature in 2002 (416/8661, pp 620-623) there's an alternate pole developing in the South Atlantic west of South Africa. There's also a geomagnetic anomaly near Lake Baikal in Siberia that causes deflection in the magnetic field measured as far away as Japan, but there's no evidence (or none as yet) that it's a developing "alternate". But one's enough, when it comes to picking apart TFA. Not only is Earth unlike the Earth they compare against while constructing their theory, it's quite capable of being equal to the giants in its unlikeness in the complete absence of diamond seas with or without diamondbergs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...unlike Earth , they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles .
" Unlike Earth , neither does Earth .
The Earth 's south magnetic pole is presently about 25.6 degrees from the south pole .
Granted , that 's not 60 degrees , but apparently neither are theirs since according to TFA the magnetic poles on Uranus and Neptune " can be up to 60 degrees off the north-south axis " , it they were , there 's be no reason to say " can be " .There 's no note regarding secondary poles on the giant planets like on the sun , but according the Oersted and Magsat satellite data and article in Nature in 2002 ( 416/8661 , pp 620-623 ) there 's an alternate pole developing in the South Atlantic west of South Africa .
There 's also a geomagnetic anomaly near Lake Baikal in Siberia that causes deflection in the magnetic field measured as far away as Japan , but there 's no evidence ( or none as yet ) that it 's a developing " alternate " .
But one 's enough , when it comes to picking apart TFA .
Not only is Earth unlike the Earth they compare against while constructing their theory , it 's quite capable of being equal to the giants in its unlikeness in the complete absence of diamond seas with or without diamondbergs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...unlike Earth, they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles.
"Unlike Earth, neither does Earth.
The Earth's south magnetic pole is presently about 25.6 degrees from the south pole.
Granted, that's not 60 degrees, but apparently neither are theirs since according to TFA the magnetic poles on Uranus and Neptune "can be up to 60 degrees off the north-south axis", it they were, there's be no reason to say "can be".There's no note regarding secondary poles on the giant planets like on the sun, but according the Oersted and Magsat satellite data and article in Nature in 2002 (416/8661, pp 620-623) there's an alternate pole developing in the South Atlantic west of South Africa.
There's also a geomagnetic anomaly near Lake Baikal in Siberia that causes deflection in the magnetic field measured as far away as Japan, but there's no evidence (or none as yet) that it's a developing "alternate".
But one's enough, when it comes to picking apart TFA.
Not only is Earth unlike the Earth they compare against while constructing their theory, it's quite capable of being equal to the giants in its unlikeness in the complete absence of diamond seas with or without diamondbergs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30920170</id>
	<title>Re:Finally</title>
	<author>nightcats</author>
	<datestamp>1264618740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>yo, liquid bling is my thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>yo , liquid bling is my thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yo, liquid bling is my thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518</id>
	<title>Well, that's one way to get the space race moving.</title>
	<author>mykos</author>
	<datestamp>1264434120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd like to let everyone know that Mars is full of gold just under the crust, and every planet around Proxima Centauri is rich with uranium.</p><p>Get that space program moving.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to let everyone know that Mars is full of gold just under the crust , and every planet around Proxima Centauri is rich with uranium.Get that space program moving .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to let everyone know that Mars is full of gold just under the crust, and every planet around Proxima Centauri is rich with uranium.Get that space program moving.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902100</id>
	<title>But, Earth's magnetical poles do not...</title>
	<author>carlhaagen</author>
	<datestamp>1264506900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>...align with its geographical poles. We were all taught this in 3rd grade. Our magnetic poles wander around the planet all the time, and are pretty far off from the geographical poles. This is called magnetic declination, and is something everyone who has studied basic navigation is well aware of.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...align with its geographical poles .
We were all taught this in 3rd grade .
Our magnetic poles wander around the planet all the time , and are pretty far off from the geographical poles .
This is called magnetic declination , and is something everyone who has studied basic navigation is well aware of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...align with its geographical poles.
We were all taught this in 3rd grade.
Our magnetic poles wander around the planet all the time, and are pretty far off from the geographical poles.
This is called magnetic declination, and is something everyone who has studied basic navigation is well aware of.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901956</id>
	<title>Re:Well, that's one way to get the space race movi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264505400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hear there's a large deposit on some moon called "Pandora" or so somewhere. Unfortunately, the locals aren't keen on us taking it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear there 's a large deposit on some moon called " Pandora " or so somewhere .
Unfortunately , the locals are n't keen on us taking it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear there's a large deposit on some moon called "Pandora" or so somewhere.
Unfortunately, the locals aren't keen on us taking it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30913826</id>
	<title>Amber Thompson</title>
	<author>Sasha-Whitefur</author>
	<datestamp>1264529580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One flaw in the article, a minor one mind you. " unlike Earth, they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles."</p><p>
&nbsp; Earths pole are not congruent, they do not match.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One flaw in the article , a minor one mind you .
" unlike Earth , they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles .
"   Earths pole are not congruent , they do not match .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One flaw in the article, a minor one mind you.
" unlike Earth, they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles.
"
  Earths pole are not congruent, they do not match.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899934</id>
	<title>Re:can't you just make a diamond in the lab?</title>
	<author>Urza9814</author>
	<datestamp>1264437780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes.</p><p>Even natural diamonds aren't the slightest bit rare on Earth. It's just the diamond cartels that make it rare.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes.Even natural diamonds are n't the slightest bit rare on Earth .
It 's just the diamond cartels that make it rare .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.Even natural diamonds aren't the slightest bit rare on Earth.
It's just the diamond cartels that make it rare.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30907442</id>
	<title>Re:For the dull knives in the drawer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264533300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I contest your claim that this fact is instrumental to life on Earth. There are indeed some lifeforms that take advantage of that fact to survive cold periods in some regions, but life in general is not dependent on this fact.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I contest your claim that this fact is instrumental to life on Earth .
There are indeed some lifeforms that take advantage of that fact to survive cold periods in some regions , but life in general is not dependent on this fact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I contest your claim that this fact is instrumental to life on Earth.
There are indeed some lifeforms that take advantage of that fact to survive cold periods in some regions, but life in general is not dependent on this fact.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901460</id>
	<title>Re:Well, that's one way to get the space race movi</title>
	<author>dgbrownnt</author>
	<datestamp>1264497960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh great.  Now it's going to turn out some 10' tall blue people live in trees on Uranus and we have to kill them to get at the diamonds...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh great .
Now it 's going to turn out some 10 ' tall blue people live in trees on Uranus and we have to kill them to get at the diamonds.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh great.
Now it's going to turn out some 10' tall blue people live in trees on Uranus and we have to kill them to get at the diamonds...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30905774</id>
	<title>Re:For the dull knives in the drawer</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1264526580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This very fact is instrumental to life on our little globe.</p></div><p>
It kind of makes you wonder if the diamond substance is capable of being the building block for a fundamentally different life form eh? The universe is a strange and beautiful place...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This very fact is instrumental to life on our little globe .
It kind of makes you wonder if the diamond substance is capable of being the building block for a fundamentally different life form eh ?
The universe is a strange and beautiful place.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This very fact is instrumental to life on our little globe.
It kind of makes you wonder if the diamond substance is capable of being the building block for a fundamentally different life form eh?
The universe is a strange and beautiful place...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899508</id>
	<title>Precisely</title>
	<author>rinoid</author>
	<datestamp>1264434000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is a very good first post. I can't touch it, nor would I want to for that matter.
<br> <br>

But the false market of these rocks has basically caused me to steer way clear of them. The woman I married and love doesn't have one from me, the only woman I purchased one for, well, I ran away.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is a very good first post .
I ca n't touch it , nor would I want to for that matter .
But the false market of these rocks has basically caused me to steer way clear of them .
The woman I married and love does n't have one from me , the only woman I purchased one for , well , I ran away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is a very good first post.
I can't touch it, nor would I want to for that matter.
But the false market of these rocks has basically caused me to steer way clear of them.
The woman I married and love doesn't have one from me, the only woman I purchased one for, well, I ran away.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901450</id>
	<title>Re:For the dull knives in the drawer</title>
	<author>pclminion</author>
	<datestamp>1264497720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since diamond is a crystal, or, if you like, a 3D polymer, what does it really mean to say that something is "molten diamond?" To what degree do the carbon atoms remain covalently bonded? Diamond in molten form could hardly be considered the same substance as crystalline diamond. With water, the individual H2O molecules maintain their identities in the solid and liquid phases. What about diamond?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since diamond is a crystal , or , if you like , a 3D polymer , what does it really mean to say that something is " molten diamond ?
" To what degree do the carbon atoms remain covalently bonded ?
Diamond in molten form could hardly be considered the same substance as crystalline diamond .
With water , the individual H2O molecules maintain their identities in the solid and liquid phases .
What about diamond ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since diamond is a crystal, or, if you like, a 3D polymer, what does it really mean to say that something is "molten diamond?
" To what degree do the carbon atoms remain covalently bonded?
Diamond in molten form could hardly be considered the same substance as crystalline diamond.
With water, the individual H2O molecules maintain their identities in the solid and liquid phases.
What about diamond?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30904548</id>
	<title>Jews</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264522080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Jews are preparing a spaceship as we speak...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Jews are preparing a spaceship as we speak.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Jews are preparing a spaceship as we speak...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30910422</id>
	<title>Re:For the dull knives in the drawer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264502700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bismuth does too, iirc.  Still, it's a rare property.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bismuth does too , iirc .
Still , it 's a rare property .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bismuth does too, iirc.
Still, it's a rare property.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899656</id>
	<title>Calling it</title>
	<author>jimmyhugs</author>
	<datestamp>1264435380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dibs on Uranus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dibs on Uranus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dibs on Uranus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30915172</id>
	<title>Re:Finally</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1264593420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Re: sig
<p>And Moses invests</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Re : sig And Moses invests</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Re: sig
And Moses invests</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900022</id>
	<title>Re:Finally</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264438500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One day in jr. high school science class we were talking about all the planets and when we got to Uranus to get it out of the way since it would happen anyways the teacher told us a bunch of Uranus jokes.  I wasn't paying attention when he started and was thus confused when half paying attention.  Uranus has a thick crust? I thought it was a gas giant? We are sending a probe to Uranus?  Really never heard of that.  I finally figured it out once he said that toilet paper and the Uss enterprise both search for Klingons in Uranus.  I'm kinda surprised there are more of these gems on this Uranus thread.  he he get it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One day in jr. high school science class we were talking about all the planets and when we got to Uranus to get it out of the way since it would happen anyways the teacher told us a bunch of Uranus jokes .
I was n't paying attention when he started and was thus confused when half paying attention .
Uranus has a thick crust ?
I thought it was a gas giant ?
We are sending a probe to Uranus ?
Really never heard of that .
I finally figured it out once he said that toilet paper and the Uss enterprise both search for Klingons in Uranus .
I 'm kinda surprised there are more of these gems on this Uranus thread .
he he get it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One day in jr. high school science class we were talking about all the planets and when we got to Uranus to get it out of the way since it would happen anyways the teacher told us a bunch of Uranus jokes.
I wasn't paying attention when he started and was thus confused when half paying attention.
Uranus has a thick crust?
I thought it was a gas giant?
We are sending a probe to Uranus?
Really never heard of that.
I finally figured it out once he said that toilet paper and the Uss enterprise both search for Klingons in Uranus.
I'm kinda surprised there are more of these gems on this Uranus thread.
he he get it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902730</id>
	<title>Re:pressure off by a magnitude</title>
	<author>oodaloop</author>
	<datestamp>1264513740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's with all these numbers and facts?  Just make a butt joke and move along already.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's with all these numbers and facts ?
Just make a butt joke and move along already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's with all these numbers and facts?
Just make a butt joke and move along already.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899796</id>
	<title>Re:Finally</title>
	<author>Ralph Spoilsport</author>
	<datestamp>1264436640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>dude - you are a fucking genius for that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>dude - you are a fucking genius for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dude - you are a fucking genius for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900416</id>
	<title>Re:can't you just make a diamond in the lab?</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1264442160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Our R&amp;D lab is pursuing an approach that we believe will be less expensive: Genetically engineering a woman that is attracted to cubic zirconia.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Our R&amp;D lab is pursuing an approach that we believe will be less expensive : Genetically engineering a woman that is attracted to cubic zirconia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our R&amp;D lab is pursuing an approach that we believe will be less expensive: Genetically engineering a woman that is attracted to cubic zirconia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900298</id>
	<title>Re:Well, that's one way to get the space race movi</title>
	<author>xactuary</author>
	<datestamp>1264441320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Until we get there, it's all unobtainium.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Until we get there , it 's all unobtainium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until we get there, it's all unobtainium.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899736</id>
	<title>Re:These aren't valuable</title>
	<author>Sir\_Lewk</author>
	<datestamp>1264436160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The price of the diamonds would still need to cover the price of retrieving them, so until it got cheap and efficient to collect them, they would still be rather expensive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The price of the diamonds would still need to cover the price of retrieving them , so until it got cheap and efficient to collect them , they would still be rather expensive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The price of the diamonds would still need to cover the price of retrieving them, so until it got cheap and efficient to collect them, they would still be rather expensive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899786</id>
	<title>can't you just make a diamond in the lab?</title>
	<author>Gizzmonic</author>
	<datestamp>1264436580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the whole diamond market a big scam?  Can't you make diamonds in a laboratory with elemental carbon at a fraction of the cost of what the diamond cartels charge?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Correct me if I 'm wrong , but is n't the whole diamond market a big scam ?
Ca n't you make diamonds in a laboratory with elemental carbon at a fraction of the cost of what the diamond cartels charge ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the whole diamond market a big scam?
Can't you make diamonds in a laboratory with elemental carbon at a fraction of the cost of what the diamond cartels charge?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899586</id>
	<title>Re:Finally</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264434660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not if the Jews get there first.<br> <br>

Who else would refer to diamond as ice<i>Berg</i>? Probably somebody named Gold<i>Berg</i>. Get it?<br> <br>

Thank you, thank you. I'll be here all week until I hop into my Volkswagen to go <i>FahrfromJuden</i>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not if the Jews get there first .
Who else would refer to diamond as iceBerg ?
Probably somebody named GoldBerg .
Get it ?
Thank you , thank you .
I 'll be here all week until I hop into my Volkswagen to go FahrfromJuden .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not if the Jews get there first.
Who else would refer to diamond as iceBerg?
Probably somebody named GoldBerg.
Get it?
Thank you, thank you.
I'll be here all week until I hop into my Volkswagen to go FahrfromJuden.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901832</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1264503420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, then thank $deity, that we still have <strong>2010</strong>!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , then thank $ deity , that we still have 2010 !
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, then thank $deity, that we still have 2010!
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30906346</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1264528740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The only people who still go &ldquo;Ooohhh, diamonds!&rdquo; are either very uninformed, or ignorant retards.</p></div><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...Or women....ooooooooh!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only people who still go    Ooohhh , diamonds !    are either very uninformed , or ignorant retards .
...Or women....ooooooooh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only people who still go “Ooohhh, diamonds!” are either very uninformed, or ignorant retards.
...Or women....ooooooooh!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900064</id>
	<title>Re:For the dull knives in the drawer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264438860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Almost nothing else does this.</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, except the most common substance on the surface of the earth: water.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Almost nothing else does this.Well , except the most common substance on the surface of the earth : water .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Almost nothing else does this.Well, except the most common substance on the surface of the earth: water.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900624</id>
	<title>grumble grumble grumble</title>
	<author>sluke</author>
	<datestamp>1264444260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is slashdot, so I suppose it should not come as a shock that the summary makes claims that don't stand up to even a casual examination.  About 15 seconds on google scholar produces the following paper:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Correa, A.A. and Bonev, S.A. and Galli, G,  Carbon under extreme conditions: Phase boundaries and electronic properties from first-principles theory.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.103, 1204 (2006)<br><a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/103/5/1204.full" title="pnas.org">link to article</a> [pnas.org]</p><p>The second paragraph of the <a href="http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v6/n1/full/nphys1438.html" title="nature.com">article</a> [nature.com] in Nature Physics (subscription required) that this story is about mentions at least 11 other papers on theoretical calculations and experiments on the melting of diamond.  So no, this is not in fact the first time that the melting of diamond has been studied. Indeed, the linked article itself refers to previous experiments at Sandia National Laboratory that melted diamond, but were unable to accurately determine the temperature and pressure.</p><p>This is truly impressive work by some very skilled scientists, but let's discuss it for what it is and not what it isn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is slashdot , so I suppose it should not come as a shock that the summary makes claims that do n't stand up to even a casual examination .
About 15 seconds on google scholar produces the following paper :     Correa , A.A. and Bonev , S.A. and Galli , G , Carbon under extreme conditions : Phase boundaries and electronic properties from first-principles theory .
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.103 , 1204 ( 2006 ) link to article [ pnas.org ] The second paragraph of the article [ nature.com ] in Nature Physics ( subscription required ) that this story is about mentions at least 11 other papers on theoretical calculations and experiments on the melting of diamond .
So no , this is not in fact the first time that the melting of diamond has been studied .
Indeed , the linked article itself refers to previous experiments at Sandia National Laboratory that melted diamond , but were unable to accurately determine the temperature and pressure.This is truly impressive work by some very skilled scientists , but let 's discuss it for what it is and not what it is n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is slashdot, so I suppose it should not come as a shock that the summary makes claims that don't stand up to even a casual examination.
About 15 seconds on google scholar produces the following paper:
    Correa, A.A. and Bonev, S.A. and Galli, G,  Carbon under extreme conditions: Phase boundaries and electronic properties from first-principles theory.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.103, 1204 (2006)link to article [pnas.org]The second paragraph of the article [nature.com] in Nature Physics (subscription required) that this story is about mentions at least 11 other papers on theoretical calculations and experiments on the melting of diamond.
So no, this is not in fact the first time that the melting of diamond has been studied.
Indeed, the linked article itself refers to previous experiments at Sandia National Laboratory that melted diamond, but were unable to accurately determine the temperature and pressure.This is truly impressive work by some very skilled scientists, but let's discuss it for what it is and not what it isn't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899898</id>
	<title>Re:Well, that's one way to get the space race movi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264437300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah! Because I'm sure if the pressure is 40 million infinition; enough to liquify diamond, I'm sure our puny steel vehicles will stand up to it just fine.

Just send someone up there to scoop it all up into a cargo hold and fly it back here. Easy peasy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah !
Because I 'm sure if the pressure is 40 million infinition ; enough to liquify diamond , I 'm sure our puny steel vehicles will stand up to it just fine .
Just send someone up there to scoop it all up into a cargo hold and fly it back here .
Easy peasy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah!
Because I'm sure if the pressure is 40 million infinition; enough to liquify diamond, I'm sure our puny steel vehicles will stand up to it just fine.
Just send someone up there to scoop it all up into a cargo hold and fly it back here.
Easy peasy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30904486</id>
	<title>Show me the candy</title>
	<author>Nerdposeur</author>
	<datestamp>1264521900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who cares? I want a planet with oceans of liquid chocolate, topped with icebergs of delicious candy.</p><p>Mmmmm, Candy Planet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who cares ?
I want a planet with oceans of liquid chocolate , topped with icebergs of delicious candy.Mmmmm , Candy Planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who cares?
I want a planet with oceans of liquid chocolate, topped with icebergs of delicious candy.Mmmmm, Candy Planet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901726</id>
	<title>So?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1264501920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All the &ldquo;worth&rdquo; of diamonds is artificial anyway.<br>A diamond can easily be made and is worth a few cents. Tops. And it&rsquo;s even of higher quality than anything nature has to offer.</p><p>The only people who still go &ldquo;Ooohhh, diamonds!&rdquo; are either very uninformed, or ignorant retards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All the    worth    of diamonds is artificial anyway.A diamond can easily be made and is worth a few cents .
Tops. And it    s even of higher quality than anything nature has to offer.The only people who still go    Ooohhh , diamonds !    are either very uninformed , or ignorant retards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the “worth” of diamonds is artificial anyway.A diamond can easily be made and is worth a few cents.
Tops. And it’s even of higher quality than anything nature has to offer.The only people who still go “Ooohhh, diamonds!” are either very uninformed, or ignorant retards.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902080</id>
	<title>But, earth's magnetic poles do not...</title>
	<author>carlhaagen</author>
	<datestamp>1264506720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...align with its geographical poles. We were all taught this in 3rd grade. Our magnetic poles wander around the planet all the time. This is called magnetic declination, and is something everyone who has studied basic navigation is well aware of.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...align with its geographical poles .
We were all taught this in 3rd grade .
Our magnetic poles wander around the planet all the time .
This is called magnetic declination , and is something everyone who has studied basic navigation is well aware of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...align with its geographical poles.
We were all taught this in 3rd grade.
Our magnetic poles wander around the planet all the time.
This is called magnetic declination, and is something everyone who has studied basic navigation is well aware of.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899628</id>
	<title>These aren't valuable</title>
	<author>Mr. Freeman</author>
	<datestamp>1264435200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>These diamonds aren't "precious".  Either they're too far out of our reach and therefore worthless or they're within our reach and they're worthless because there's so many of them.  If we could ever make it there and back the diamond market would crash.  Not that that would be a bad thing.  Debeers needs to have their illegal monopoly crushed by any means necessary.</htmltext>
<tokenext>These diamonds are n't " precious " .
Either they 're too far out of our reach and therefore worthless or they 're within our reach and they 're worthless because there 's so many of them .
If we could ever make it there and back the diamond market would crash .
Not that that would be a bad thing .
Debeers needs to have their illegal monopoly crushed by any means necessary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These diamonds aren't "precious".
Either they're too far out of our reach and therefore worthless or they're within our reach and they're worthless because there's so many of them.
If we could ever make it there and back the diamond market would crash.
Not that that would be a bad thing.
Debeers needs to have their illegal monopoly crushed by any means necessary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30905704</id>
	<title>Re:vindication for bluegrass</title>
	<author>klokop</author>
	<datestamp>1264526340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So can Sonic Youth. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxQSyzHi2-Y" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxQSyzHi2-Y</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>So can Sonic Youth .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = AxQSyzHi2-Y [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So can Sonic Youth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxQSyzHi2-Y [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901226</id>
	<title>Let's get one thing straight....</title>
	<author>Kleen13</author>
	<datestamp>1264538160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not one fekking word to my wife.  I will find you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not one fekking word to my wife .
I will find you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not one fekking word to my wife.
I will find you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899604</id>
	<title>pressure off by a magnitude</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1264434900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>40 million atmospheres is the kind of pressure that you'd measure under 400 million meters (400,000km) of material at a density of 1 g/cm^3 at a constant 1 g.  Uranus and Neptune's gravity field is near 1g give or take and the density is not much more than 1g/cm^3 so the pressure in the core can not be 40 million atmospheres as there isn't ~400,000 km of material sitting above the core.  Given that Uranus has a radius of ~25,000 km, density of ~1.27 g/cm^3, surface gravity of 8.7 m/s^2 and that the gravity field drops off roughly linearly with depth, the pressure is probably about a tenth of what TFA says diamond started to melt.  Either someone dropped a zero where it didn't belong or Diamond isn't fluid in these planets' cores.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>40 million atmospheres is the kind of pressure that you 'd measure under 400 million meters ( 400,000km ) of material at a density of 1 g/cm ^ 3 at a constant 1 g. Uranus and Neptune 's gravity field is near 1g give or take and the density is not much more than 1g/cm ^ 3 so the pressure in the core can not be 40 million atmospheres as there is n't ~ 400,000 km of material sitting above the core .
Given that Uranus has a radius of ~ 25,000 km , density of ~ 1.27 g/cm ^ 3 , surface gravity of 8.7 m/s ^ 2 and that the gravity field drops off roughly linearly with depth , the pressure is probably about a tenth of what TFA says diamond started to melt .
Either someone dropped a zero where it did n't belong or Diamond is n't fluid in these planets ' cores .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>40 million atmospheres is the kind of pressure that you'd measure under 400 million meters (400,000km) of material at a density of 1 g/cm^3 at a constant 1 g.  Uranus and Neptune's gravity field is near 1g give or take and the density is not much more than 1g/cm^3 so the pressure in the core can not be 40 million atmospheres as there isn't ~400,000 km of material sitting above the core.
Given that Uranus has a radius of ~25,000 km, density of ~1.27 g/cm^3, surface gravity of 8.7 m/s^2 and that the gravity field drops off roughly linearly with depth, the pressure is probably about a tenth of what TFA says diamond started to melt.
Either someone dropped a zero where it didn't belong or Diamond isn't fluid in these planets' cores.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30903374</id>
	<title>What About Blue Creatures?</title>
	<author>SRA8</author>
	<datestamp>1264517580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But let me guess, the diamond river is running beneath the holy-land of a civilization of blue creatures, who will need to be eliminated using Blackwater mercenaries?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But let me guess , the diamond river is running beneath the holy-land of a civilization of blue creatures , who will need to be eliminated using Blackwater mercenaries ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But let me guess, the diamond river is running beneath the holy-land of a civilization of blue creatures, who will need to be eliminated using Blackwater mercenaries?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901216</id>
	<title>Right about now ...</title>
	<author>bizitch</author>
	<datestamp>1264538040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DeBeers is building a space ship</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DeBeers is building a space ship</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DeBeers is building a space ship</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900792</id>
	<title>Artificial Scarcity</title>
	<author>newgalactic</author>
	<datestamp>1264446120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Oceans of Diamonds"???  De Beers has that already.  Have you ever heard of "Artificial Scarcity"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Oceans of Diamonds " ? ? ?
De Beers has that already .
Have you ever heard of " Artificial Scarcity " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Oceans of Diamonds"???
De Beers has that already.
Have you ever heard of "Artificial Scarcity"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899584</id>
	<title>Much as I'd love to make a great pun about uranus.</title>
	<author>cmowire</author>
	<datestamp>1264434660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The possibilities of exploring the outer "ice giants" is massive.  I think, at least.  I may not even make the pun because I think the idea of exploring them is so interesting.</p><p>Submarines are designed to handle a test depth of maybe 1600 ft which means maybe 50 bar of pressure. At that pressure, the atmosphere of Uranus is a little below freezing. The gravity is less than Earth. I suspect that with correct ballasting you could make a metal sphere float in the atmosphere for quite some time by keeping the insides pressurized to a convenient atmospheric pressure.  So sticking around for a while isn't hard.</p><p>I can't find any good information on the radiation environment there and if you could put humans in the little bubble circling Uranus.. um..  yeah, I lied above.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The possibilities of exploring the outer " ice giants " is massive .
I think , at least .
I may not even make the pun because I think the idea of exploring them is so interesting.Submarines are designed to handle a test depth of maybe 1600 ft which means maybe 50 bar of pressure .
At that pressure , the atmosphere of Uranus is a little below freezing .
The gravity is less than Earth .
I suspect that with correct ballasting you could make a metal sphere float in the atmosphere for quite some time by keeping the insides pressurized to a convenient atmospheric pressure .
So sticking around for a while is n't hard.I ca n't find any good information on the radiation environment there and if you could put humans in the little bubble circling Uranus.. um.. yeah , I lied above .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The possibilities of exploring the outer "ice giants" is massive.
I think, at least.
I may not even make the pun because I think the idea of exploring them is so interesting.Submarines are designed to handle a test depth of maybe 1600 ft which means maybe 50 bar of pressure.
At that pressure, the atmosphere of Uranus is a little below freezing.
The gravity is less than Earth.
I suspect that with correct ballasting you could make a metal sphere float in the atmosphere for quite some time by keeping the insides pressurized to a convenient atmospheric pressure.
So sticking around for a while isn't hard.I can't find any good information on the radiation environment there and if you could put humans in the little bubble circling Uranus.. um..  yeah, I lied above.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899538</id>
	<title>Article is clearly misinformed</title>
	<author>Trogre</author>
	<datestamp>1264434240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's no way this is even remotely possible.</p><p>I mean, diamonds are rare, aren't they?  You know it, I know it, and De Beers know it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no way this is even remotely possible.I mean , diamonds are rare , are n't they ?
You know it , I know it , and De Beers know it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no way this is even remotely possible.I mean, diamonds are rare, aren't they?
You know it, I know it, and De Beers know it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899784</id>
	<title>Ew...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264436580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.... There are nuggets on Ura... oh boy, this one is gonna go on forever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.... There are nuggets on Ura... oh boy , this one is gon na go on forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.... There are nuggets on Ura... oh boy, this one is gonna go on forever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902658</id>
	<title>Know your Jazz</title>
	<author>MistrX</author>
	<datestamp>1264513140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Diamondus!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Diamondus !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Diamondus!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900208</id>
	<title>More fake science</title>
	<author>Sam36</author>
	<datestamp>1264440480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How can anyone really prove this without first going to the planet? Sounds kinda lame</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can anyone really prove this without first going to the planet ?
Sounds kinda lame</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can anyone really prove this without first going to the planet?
Sounds kinda lame</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901860</id>
	<title>Hate to say it..</title>
	<author>Mr\_Miagi</author>
	<datestamp>1264503780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... but now Uranus is a girl's best friend!</htmltext>
<tokenext>... but now Uranus is a girl 's best friend !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... but now Uranus is a girl's best friend!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899696</id>
	<title>NASA announces a new backer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264435740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NASA launches a joint space program with De Beers. The world's largest diamond producer is looking forward to cutting house sized diamonds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA launches a joint space program with De Beers .
The world 's largest diamond producer is looking forward to cutting house sized diamonds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA launches a joint space program with De Beers.
The world's largest diamond producer is looking forward to cutting house sized diamonds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899896</id>
	<title>JC had it right!</title>
	<author>cadeon</author>
	<datestamp>1264437300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cue the Blue People and Human Mercenary Invaders!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cue the Blue People and Human Mercenary Invaders !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cue the Blue People and Human Mercenary Invaders!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899804</id>
	<title>Re:Actually "Oceans of melted coal"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264436700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously "liquid carbon" is the proper name, but I guess why they are calling it "liquid diamond" is because they are exploring the pressure/temperature region of the phase diagram where it solidifies into diamond (ergo diamond floating in liquid carbon).</p><p><a href="http://dao.mit.edu/8.231/carbon\_phase\_diagram.jpg" title="mit.edu">http://dao.mit.edu/8.231/carbon\_phase\_diagram.jpg</a> [mit.edu]</p><p>I don't get whey they are saying liquid Carbon may exist on Uranus though - the phase diagram indicates a minumum temperature for the liquid phase of 4.5 x 10^3 K, and even the core of Uranus is nowhere near that hot. Neptune, maybe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously " liquid carbon " is the proper name , but I guess why they are calling it " liquid diamond " is because they are exploring the pressure/temperature region of the phase diagram where it solidifies into diamond ( ergo diamond floating in liquid carbon ) .http : //dao.mit.edu/8.231/carbon \ _phase \ _diagram.jpg [ mit.edu ] I do n't get whey they are saying liquid Carbon may exist on Uranus though - the phase diagram indicates a minumum temperature for the liquid phase of 4.5 x 10 ^ 3 K , and even the core of Uranus is nowhere near that hot .
Neptune , maybe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously "liquid carbon" is the proper name, but I guess why they are calling it "liquid diamond" is because they are exploring the pressure/temperature region of the phase diagram where it solidifies into diamond (ergo diamond floating in liquid carbon).http://dao.mit.edu/8.231/carbon\_phase\_diagram.jpg [mit.edu]I don't get whey they are saying liquid Carbon may exist on Uranus though - the phase diagram indicates a minumum temperature for the liquid phase of 4.5 x 10^3 K, and even the core of Uranus is nowhere near that hot.
Neptune, maybe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899486</id>
	<title>vindication for bluegrass</title>
	<author>Trepidity</author>
	<datestamp>1264433880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like many sci-fi authors who predicted inventions long before they became practical, bluegrass can now <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXL\_rmqmLwU" title="youtube.com">claim</a> [youtube.com] foresight into future scientific advances.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like many sci-fi authors who predicted inventions long before they became practical , bluegrass can now claim [ youtube.com ] foresight into future scientific advances .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like many sci-fi authors who predicted inventions long before they became practical, bluegrass can now claim [youtube.com] foresight into future scientific advances.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900816</id>
	<title>Waht do yo mean, unlike earth?</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1264446600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> unlike Earth, they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Earth's magnetic poles don't match the geographic poles.  They pretty much never have, except by coincidence.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>unlike Earth , they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles .
Earth 's magnetic poles do n't match the geographic poles .
They pretty much never have , except by coincidence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> unlike Earth, they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles.
Earth's magnetic poles don't match the geographic poles.
They pretty much never have, except by coincidence.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899626</id>
	<title>Actually "Oceans of melted coal"</title>
	<author>viking80</author>
	<datestamp>1264435200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder why the headline isn't<br>Uranus and Neptune May Have "Oceans of melted coal"</p><p>"diamond" is by definition a solid crystalline form of carbon. If you melt it, it is by definition not diamond anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder why the headline isn'tUranus and Neptune May Have " Oceans of melted coal " " diamond " is by definition a solid crystalline form of carbon .
If you melt it , it is by definition not diamond anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder why the headline isn'tUranus and Neptune May Have "Oceans of melted coal""diamond" is by definition a solid crystalline form of carbon.
If you melt it, it is by definition not diamond anymore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30903260</id>
	<title>Re:Finally</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1264516920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is the starship Enterprise like toilet paper?</p><p>Both circle Uranus picking up Klingons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is the starship Enterprise like toilet paper ? Both circle Uranus picking up Klingons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is the starship Enterprise like toilet paper?Both circle Uranus picking up Klingons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30908738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30903114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30905774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30906492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30904548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30905066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30907442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900578
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30903260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30907188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30908202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30915172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30905804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30906346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899898
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30910422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30905704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30920170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_26_0132226_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30904240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899778
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899820
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899616
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899500
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899518
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899894
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902290
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901956
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30906492
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899722
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30906346
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899816
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900048
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30908738
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900802
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30908202
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901378
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901684
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30903114
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901798
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901832
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900930
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902936
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30915172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30904548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30903260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30904240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899586
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30905066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30920170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900012
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30905804
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899934
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901900
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899584
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899888
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899620
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901450
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30902374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30907188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899612
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30907442
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30905774
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30910422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899730
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30900400
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30901442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899536
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30905704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899696
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_26_0132226.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_26_0132226.30899974
</commentlist>
</conversation>
