<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_21_1918204</id>
	<title>Mozilla Firefox 3.6 Released</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1264103520000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Shining Celebi writes <i>"Mozilla has released <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/personal.html">Firefox 3.6</a> today, which adds support for <a href="http://www.getpersonas.com/en-US/">Personas</a>, lightweight themes that can be installed without restarting the browser, and adds <a href="http://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/01/javascript-speedups-in-firefox-3-6/">further performance improvements to the new Tracemonkey Javascript engine</a>. One of the <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2010/01/19/things-youll-love-about-firefox-3-6/">major goals</a> of the release was to improve startup time and general UI responsiveness, especially the Awesomebar. You can read the <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/3.6/releasenotes/">full set of release notes here</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shining Celebi writes " Mozilla has released Firefox 3.6 today , which adds support for Personas , lightweight themes that can be installed without restarting the browser , and adds further performance improvements to the new Tracemonkey Javascript engine .
One of the major goals of the release was to improve startup time and general UI responsiveness , especially the Awesomebar .
You can read the full set of release notes here .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shining Celebi writes "Mozilla has released Firefox 3.6 today, which adds support for Personas, lightweight themes that can be installed without restarting the browser, and adds further performance improvements to the new Tracemonkey Javascript engine.
One of the major goals of the release was to improve startup time and general UI responsiveness, especially the Awesomebar.
You can read the full set of release notes here.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850450</id>
	<title>Awesomebar functionality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264065540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somebody wake me up when I can have the Awesomebar function like the FF2 location bar. I know there's extensions that make the appearance similar, but the ordering algorithm is inferior (for me), and there's no way to have it ignore www prefixes when having it search by first term.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody wake me up when I can have the Awesomebar function like the FF2 location bar .
I know there 's extensions that make the appearance similar , but the ordering algorithm is inferior ( for me ) , and there 's no way to have it ignore www prefixes when having it search by first term .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody wake me up when I can have the Awesomebar function like the FF2 location bar.
I know there's extensions that make the appearance similar, but the ordering algorithm is inferior (for me), and there's no way to have it ignore www prefixes when having it search by first term.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851760</id>
	<title>Re:Personas...?</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1264069680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They spent $30 million on development in 2008 (I haven't found a public link to 2009). That allows for a pretty wide todo list.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They spent $ 30 million on development in 2008 ( I have n't found a public link to 2009 ) .
That allows for a pretty wide todo list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They spent $30 million on development in 2008 (I haven't found a public link to 2009).
That allows for a pretty wide todo list.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30853734</id>
	<title>Re:Personas, lightweight themes?</title>
	<author>gbjbaanb</author>
	<datestamp>1264076280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you run Vista, or Windows 7? How many apps do you have now that fit with the OS now? I mean, even Office totally ignores Windows themes and gives you a choice of 3, incompatible ones - black, wimpy blue and silver.</p><p>If its good enough for MS to scrap the (excellent) Window style guidelines and allow any old UI crap in, then FF is just another first-class app on Windows.</p><p>(I'd mention Linux, but then it'd only turn into a Gnome v KDE flame<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you run Vista , or Windows 7 ?
How many apps do you have now that fit with the OS now ?
I mean , even Office totally ignores Windows themes and gives you a choice of 3 , incompatible ones - black , wimpy blue and silver.If its good enough for MS to scrap the ( excellent ) Window style guidelines and allow any old UI crap in , then FF is just another first-class app on Windows .
( I 'd mention Linux , but then it 'd only turn into a Gnome v KDE flame : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you run Vista, or Windows 7?
How many apps do you have now that fit with the OS now?
I mean, even Office totally ignores Windows themes and gives you a choice of 3, incompatible ones - black, wimpy blue and silver.If its good enough for MS to scrap the (excellent) Window style guidelines and allow any old UI crap in, then FF is just another first-class app on Windows.
(I'd mention Linux, but then it'd only turn into a Gnome v KDE flame :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30854130</id>
	<title>Re:I use QuickProxy</title>
	<author>Threni</author>
	<datestamp>1264078020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use Linux (Ubuntu), so I look forward to this being available in about 4 months time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use Linux ( Ubuntu ) , so I look forward to this being available in about 4 months time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use Linux (Ubuntu), so I look forward to this being available in about 4 months time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850790</id>
	<title>Re:Where can I download this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264066800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>try the <a href="lemonparty.org" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Lemon Archive</a> [slashdot.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>try the Lemon Archive [ slashdot.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>try the Lemon Archive [slashdot.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850858</id>
	<title>Re:Where can I download this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264066980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>so all your remote shells are also firewalled.  No.?? return nerdbadge immediately. kthx.</htmltext>
<tokenext>so all your remote shells are also firewalled .
No. ? ? return nerdbadge immediately .
kthx .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so all your remote shells are also firewalled.
No.?? return nerdbadge immediately.
kthx.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851832</id>
	<title>Re:Open Link in New Tab changed</title>
	<author>RavenChild</author>
	<datestamp>1264069920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been using the nightly builds for awhile and this feature bugged the hell out of me.  Give it some time and it will grow on you.  When you open a link in a tab, you don't have to go looking toward the back of the list of tabs (helpful if you have way too many open). </p><p>After using it for a while, I feel that it's more natural way of doing things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been using the nightly builds for awhile and this feature bugged the hell out of me .
Give it some time and it will grow on you .
When you open a link in a tab , you do n't have to go looking toward the back of the list of tabs ( helpful if you have way too many open ) .
After using it for a while , I feel that it 's more natural way of doing things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been using the nightly builds for awhile and this feature bugged the hell out of me.
Give it some time and it will grow on you.
When you open a link in a tab, you don't have to go looking toward the back of the list of tabs (helpful if you have way too many open).
After using it for a while, I feel that it's more natural way of doing things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851454</id>
	<title>Re:Personas...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264068780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Personas? Now, where is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persona\_4" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Dojima</a> [wikipedia.org]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Personas ?
Now , where is Dojima [ wikipedia.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personas?
Now, where is Dojima [wikipedia.org]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855760</id>
	<title>Re:Open Link in New Tab changed</title>
	<author>GaryOlson</author>
	<datestamp>1264089540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ah, thanks. I thought I was hallucinating.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , thanks .
I thought I was hallucinating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, thanks.
I thought I was hallucinating.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851644</id>
	<title>All In One Mouse Gestures LiveHTTPHeader</title>
	<author>BigFire</author>
	<datestamp>1264069320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fails for me.  I kept on trying to use gesture to close tab.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fails for me .
I kept on trying to use gesture to close tab .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fails for me.
I kept on trying to use gesture to close tab.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30853832</id>
	<title>Re:Javascript performance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264076700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And Firefox kicks Chrome's tail at Arrays (6 times faster) and Strings (2 times faster) in Dromaeo.<br>Your point?</p><p>There are bits they are working on that are specifically test-related.<br><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=523497" title="mozilla.org" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=523497</a> [mozilla.org]<br><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=516264" title="mozilla.org" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=516264</a> [mozilla.org]</p><p>And other general bits too.  Overall, the differences are not as wide as you make them out to be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And Firefox kicks Chrome 's tail at Arrays ( 6 times faster ) and Strings ( 2 times faster ) in Dromaeo.Your point ? There are bits they are working on that are specifically test-related.https : //bugzilla.mozilla.org/show \ _bug.cgi ? id = 523497 [ mozilla.org ] https : //bugzilla.mozilla.org/show \ _bug.cgi ? id = 516264 [ mozilla.org ] And other general bits too .
Overall , the differences are not as wide as you make them out to be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And Firefox kicks Chrome's tail at Arrays (6 times faster) and Strings (2 times faster) in Dromaeo.Your point?There are bits they are working on that are specifically test-related.https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=523497 [mozilla.org]https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=516264 [mozilla.org]And other general bits too.
Overall, the differences are not as wide as you make them out to be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30871592</id>
	<title>Ugh</title>
	<author>rantingkitten</author>
	<datestamp>1264278060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>One of the major goals of the release was to improve startup time and general UI responsiveness, especially the Awesomebar. </i> <br>
<br>
What would really improve responsiveness of the Awesomebar is to <b>get rid of it</b>, or at least let me turn it off.  I find it utterly and completely useless, and detrimental more often than not.  I just want the old, sane behavior of checking the <i>first</i> few letters I'm typing and matching against sites I've been to recently where the URLs <i>begin with</i> those letters.  I don't want it to search for "do those letters appear anywhere in the URL string, anywhere in the title, anywhere in the bloody bookmarks".  Really, there is zero percent chance, whatsoever, that my typing "g" into the address bar means I want to go to a bookmark I stashed away years ago which has "Complete Listing" in the title because, hey, "listing" has a "g".  What kind of brain-damaged behavior is that?  <br>
<br>
Sure, it claims to learn over time, but it doesn't seem to actually do this, and in any event, clearing out your history complete ruins that.  Plus, since its suggestions are wrong so often, I end up going to the wrong site, which it of course counts as a hit on that and adds to whatever asinine "learning" routine it's using.  <br>
<br>
None of the about:config tricks or plugins actually work to remove this abomination either.  For the love of god, let me and the millions of others who hate the Awesomebar turn that garbage <b>off</b>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the major goals of the release was to improve startup time and general UI responsiveness , especially the Awesomebar .
What would really improve responsiveness of the Awesomebar is to get rid of it , or at least let me turn it off .
I find it utterly and completely useless , and detrimental more often than not .
I just want the old , sane behavior of checking the first few letters I 'm typing and matching against sites I 've been to recently where the URLs begin with those letters .
I do n't want it to search for " do those letters appear anywhere in the URL string , anywhere in the title , anywhere in the bloody bookmarks " .
Really , there is zero percent chance , whatsoever , that my typing " g " into the address bar means I want to go to a bookmark I stashed away years ago which has " Complete Listing " in the title because , hey , " listing " has a " g " .
What kind of brain-damaged behavior is that ?
Sure , it claims to learn over time , but it does n't seem to actually do this , and in any event , clearing out your history complete ruins that .
Plus , since its suggestions are wrong so often , I end up going to the wrong site , which it of course counts as a hit on that and adds to whatever asinine " learning " routine it 's using .
None of the about : config tricks or plugins actually work to remove this abomination either .
For the love of god , let me and the millions of others who hate the Awesomebar turn that garbage off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the major goals of the release was to improve startup time and general UI responsiveness, especially the Awesomebar.
What would really improve responsiveness of the Awesomebar is to get rid of it, or at least let me turn it off.
I find it utterly and completely useless, and detrimental more often than not.
I just want the old, sane behavior of checking the first few letters I'm typing and matching against sites I've been to recently where the URLs begin with those letters.
I don't want it to search for "do those letters appear anywhere in the URL string, anywhere in the title, anywhere in the bloody bookmarks".
Really, there is zero percent chance, whatsoever, that my typing "g" into the address bar means I want to go to a bookmark I stashed away years ago which has "Complete Listing" in the title because, hey, "listing" has a "g".
What kind of brain-damaged behavior is that?
Sure, it claims to learn over time, but it doesn't seem to actually do this, and in any event, clearing out your history complete ruins that.
Plus, since its suggestions are wrong so often, I end up going to the wrong site, which it of course counts as a hit on that and adds to whatever asinine "learning" routine it's using.
None of the about:config tricks or plugins actually work to remove this abomination either.
For the love of god, let me and the millions of others who hate the Awesomebar turn that garbage off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851046</id>
	<title>Re:How about fixing the Memory leaks?</title>
	<author>DamageLabs</author>
	<datestamp>1264067640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must be lucky. My instance is using 1.5GB, after about a week of runtime.</p><p>Oh well, Chrome does top it at over 2 gigs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be lucky .
My instance is using 1.5GB , after about a week of runtime.Oh well , Chrome does top it at over 2 gigs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be lucky.
My instance is using 1.5GB, after about a week of runtime.Oh well, Chrome does top it at over 2 gigs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30853394</id>
	<title>And yet...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264075020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"One of the major goals of the release was to improve startup time and general UI responsiveness, especially the Awesomebar. You can read the full set of release notes here."</p><p>Ironic, then, that the "awesomebar" and the UI both became exponentially more-unusable, really-laggy on my PC, forcing me to revert to 3.5.7.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" One of the major goals of the release was to improve startup time and general UI responsiveness , especially the Awesomebar .
You can read the full set of release notes here .
" Ironic , then , that the " awesomebar " and the UI both became exponentially more-unusable , really-laggy on my PC , forcing me to revert to 3.5.7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"One of the major goals of the release was to improve startup time and general UI responsiveness, especially the Awesomebar.
You can read the full set of release notes here.
"Ironic, then, that the "awesomebar" and the UI both became exponentially more-unusable, really-laggy on my PC, forcing me to revert to 3.5.7.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851238</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264068120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anybody know why it always pesters you to update the Yahoo toolbar--when you don't have the toolbar installed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anybody know why it always pesters you to update the Yahoo toolbar--when you do n't have the toolbar installed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anybody know why it always pesters you to update the Yahoo toolbar--when you don't have the toolbar installed?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856770</id>
	<title>Re:Open Link in New Tab changed</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1264100700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So it finally works like everything else, and how you expect it to work anyway eh?  Good to see they finally fix simple UI issues after several years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So it finally works like everything else , and how you expect it to work anyway eh ?
Good to see they finally fix simple UI issues after several years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it finally works like everything else, and how you expect it to work anyway eh?
Good to see they finally fix simple UI issues after several years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855152</id>
	<title>Re:Speed Kills (play it safe - buy a Chevy)</title>
	<author>CoonAss56</author>
	<datestamp>1264084440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You realize that Chevy has won more over all championships  in every kind of racing than any other make, right?<br>Because if you don't you are just ignorant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You realize that Chevy has won more over all championships in every kind of racing than any other make , right ? Because if you do n't you are just ignorant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You realize that Chevy has won more over all championships  in every kind of racing than any other make, right?Because if you don't you are just ignorant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851182</id>
	<title>Upgrading Firefox?</title>
	<author>YankDownUnder</author>
	<datestamp>1264068000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What - does this mean I have to get rid of my linux version of Internet Exploder? Dang.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What - does this mean I have to get rid of my linux version of Internet Exploder ?
Dang .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What - does this mean I have to get rid of my linux version of Internet Exploder?
Dang.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855748</id>
	<title>Re:Scrolling</title>
	<author>GaryOlson</author>
	<datestamp>1264089420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You do realize addons exist to change the functionality of the scroll wheel?<br> <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5846" title="mozilla.org">I have been using this addon</a> [mozilla.org] for quite a while now to modify FF scrolling functionality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do realize addons exist to change the functionality of the scroll wheel ?
I have been using this addon [ mozilla.org ] for quite a while now to modify FF scrolling functionality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do realize addons exist to change the functionality of the scroll wheel?
I have been using this addon [mozilla.org] for quite a while now to modify FF scrolling functionality.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090</id>
	<title>Javascript performance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264107420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>My javascript performance comparison between Firefox 3.6 and Chrome and Safari <a href="http://www.manu-j.com/blog/firefox-3-6-vs-chrome-vs-safari-javascript-performance/432/" title="manu-j.com">http://www.manu-j.com/blog/firefox-3-6-vs-chrome-vs-safari-javascript-performance/432/</a> [manu-j.com]<blockquote><div><p>As usual, Firefox performance on the v8 benchmark is pathetic where Chrome is more than 10 times faster.It is 24\% faster than version 3.5.4 in V8 but it is clearly not enough. In the sunspider test, chrome is 2 times as fast as firefox. In this test, 3.6 is 17\% faster than 3.5.4. Safari too comfortably beats Firefox in both these benchmarks</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My javascript performance comparison between Firefox 3.6 and Chrome and Safari http : //www.manu-j.com/blog/firefox-3-6-vs-chrome-vs-safari-javascript-performance/432/ [ manu-j.com ] As usual , Firefox performance on the v8 benchmark is pathetic where Chrome is more than 10 times faster.It is 24 \ % faster than version 3.5.4 in V8 but it is clearly not enough .
In the sunspider test , chrome is 2 times as fast as firefox .
In this test , 3.6 is 17 \ % faster than 3.5.4 .
Safari too comfortably beats Firefox in both these benchmarks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My javascript performance comparison between Firefox 3.6 and Chrome and Safari http://www.manu-j.com/blog/firefox-3-6-vs-chrome-vs-safari-javascript-performance/432/ [manu-j.com]As usual, Firefox performance on the v8 benchmark is pathetic where Chrome is more than 10 times faster.It is 24\% faster than version 3.5.4 in V8 but it is clearly not enough.
In the sunspider test, chrome is 2 times as fast as firefox.
In this test, 3.6 is 17\% faster than 3.5.4.
Safari too comfortably beats Firefox in both these benchmarks
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30860346</id>
	<title>Re:All In One Mouse Gestures LiveHTTPHeader</title>
	<author>BigFire</author>
	<datestamp>1264180380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, there's a way to get around the version check, and All in One Mouse Gesture doesn't exactly totally work, but here it goes:</p><p>at the address bar, type in:<br>
&nbsp; about:config<br>Right click and add a new boolean:<br>
&nbsp; extensions.checkCompatibility.3.6<br>and set the value to false.</p><p>This will allow the extension to run, albeit, no guarantee.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , there 's a way to get around the version check , and All in One Mouse Gesture does n't exactly totally work , but here it goes : at the address bar , type in :   about : configRight click and add a new boolean :   extensions.checkCompatibility.3.6and set the value to false.This will allow the extension to run , albeit , no guarantee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, there's a way to get around the version check, and All in One Mouse Gesture doesn't exactly totally work, but here it goes:at the address bar, type in:
  about:configRight click and add a new boolean:
  extensions.checkCompatibility.3.6and set the value to false.This will allow the extension to run, albeit, no guarantee.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856242</id>
	<title>I'm confused...</title>
	<author>TangoMargarine</author>
	<datestamp>1264094220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Firefox needs to have these features!
<br>Firefox rocks because it has these features (addons)!<br>Firefox should fix this!<br>Firefox should inform us about J Random Privacy Threat That Everybody Already Knows About!"</p><p>I'm trying to tell where this is going...</p><p>1) Firefox does let you export bookmarks. Granted, it exports all of them, but how hard can it be to crack open the HTML file and strip out the ones you don't want to send?
<br>2) "Not being a jerk about extensions"? In what way? Just go to the web page and look around, it's not like the add-ons window is the only place you can get them.
<br>3) "Letting the world know"? Am I being wooshed? You're saying they should beat their own chests? Maybe run some cocky TV commercials that says FF is cool and provide no actual info to back it up?
<br>4) "give users control to wipe things clean": it's still there. Or just tap Ctrl+Shift+Del before you exit.
<br>5) "SOB web collectors": who isn't these days? Personally, I'm tired of being warned that every food I can possibly eat is decreasing my life expectancy in some way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Firefox needs to have these features !
Firefox rocks because it has these features ( addons ) ! Firefox should fix this ! Firefox should inform us about J Random Privacy Threat That Everybody Already Knows About !
" I 'm trying to tell where this is going...1 ) Firefox does let you export bookmarks .
Granted , it exports all of them , but how hard can it be to crack open the HTML file and strip out the ones you do n't want to send ?
2 ) " Not being a jerk about extensions " ?
In what way ?
Just go to the web page and look around , it 's not like the add-ons window is the only place you can get them .
3 ) " Letting the world know " ?
Am I being wooshed ?
You 're saying they should beat their own chests ?
Maybe run some cocky TV commercials that says FF is cool and provide no actual info to back it up ?
4 ) " give users control to wipe things clean " : it 's still there .
Or just tap Ctrl + Shift + Del before you exit .
5 ) " SOB web collectors " : who is n't these days ?
Personally , I 'm tired of being warned that every food I can possibly eat is decreasing my life expectancy in some way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Firefox needs to have these features!
Firefox rocks because it has these features (addons)!Firefox should fix this!Firefox should inform us about J Random Privacy Threat That Everybody Already Knows About!
"I'm trying to tell where this is going...1) Firefox does let you export bookmarks.
Granted, it exports all of them, but how hard can it be to crack open the HTML file and strip out the ones you don't want to send?
2) "Not being a jerk about extensions"?
In what way?
Just go to the web page and look around, it's not like the add-ons window is the only place you can get them.
3) "Letting the world know"?
Am I being wooshed?
You're saying they should beat their own chests?
Maybe run some cocky TV commercials that says FF is cool and provide no actual info to back it up?
4) "give users control to wipe things clean": it's still there.
Or just tap Ctrl+Shift+Del before you exit.
5) "SOB web collectors": who isn't these days?
Personally, I'm tired of being warned that every food I can possibly eat is decreasing my life expectancy in some way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30854690</id>
	<title>Re:Personas, lightweight themes?</title>
	<author>flimflammer</author>
	<datestamp>1264081020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Normally, I would agree. I truly loathe programs that feel the need to be unique and theme themselves accordingly.</p><p>However the "skinning" done with Persona really is lightweight and, when you're not using an over the top theme, can fit nicely into the browser. It simply blends in a texture with the stock UI theme. It doesn't really change anything, otherwise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Normally , I would agree .
I truly loathe programs that feel the need to be unique and theme themselves accordingly.However the " skinning " done with Persona really is lightweight and , when you 're not using an over the top theme , can fit nicely into the browser .
It simply blends in a texture with the stock UI theme .
It does n't really change anything , otherwise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Normally, I would agree.
I truly loathe programs that feel the need to be unique and theme themselves accordingly.However the "skinning" done with Persona really is lightweight and, when you're not using an over the top theme, can fit nicely into the browser.
It simply blends in a texture with the stock UI theme.
It doesn't really change anything, otherwise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856718</id>
	<title>Re:The competition is heating up!!</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1264099980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Microsoft's patch vs. Mozilla's release. I can't wait. The <strong>excrement</strong> is almost too much.</p></div></blockquote><p>Fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft 's patch vs. Mozilla 's release .
I ca n't wait .
The excrement is almost too much.Fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft's patch vs. Mozilla's release.
I can't wait.
The excrement is almost too much.Fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851966</id>
	<title>Re:How about fixing the Memory leaks?</title>
	<author>bonch</author>
	<datestamp>1264070280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unused memory is wasted memory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unused memory is wasted memory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unused memory is wasted memory.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30864436</id>
	<title>Works better than your trolling and skimming BitZ</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264159320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1512306&amp;cid=30785704" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1512306&amp;cid=30785704</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>Utterly hilarious: See BitzTream run in the URL above (after he being caught skimming like the typical troll does).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1512306&amp;cid = 30785704 [ slashdot.org ] Utterly hilarious : See BitzTream run in the URL above ( after he being caught skimming like the typical troll does ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1512306&amp;cid=30785704 [slashdot.org]Utterly hilarious: See BitzTream run in the URL above (after he being caught skimming like the typical troll does).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30853840</id>
	<title>Re:Scrolling</title>
	<author>Chad Birch</author>
	<datestamp>1264076700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apparently it's to <a href="http://margaret.mit.edu/2009/08/making-firefox-feel-faster/" title="mit.edu">"make Firefox feel faster"</a> [mit.edu]. What a terrible decision, I had to immediately figure out how to change things back.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently it 's to " make Firefox feel faster " [ mit.edu ] .
What a terrible decision , I had to immediately figure out how to change things back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently it's to "make Firefox feel faster" [mit.edu].
What a terrible decision, I had to immediately figure out how to change things back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855808</id>
	<title>Re:Personas, lightweight themes?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264089960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Firefox needs to prioritize the per process tabbed browsing. Having the screen lockup when I open 3 tabs is why I switched to Chrome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Firefox needs to prioritize the per process tabbed browsing .
Having the screen lockup when I open 3 tabs is why I switched to Chrome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Firefox needs to prioritize the per process tabbed browsing.
Having the screen lockup when I open 3 tabs is why I switched to Chrome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30852786</id>
	<title>Re:GPU accelerated Firefox?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264072800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Konqueror (with KHTML) already does hardware accelerated blending of alpha pixmaps. Boyah!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Konqueror ( with KHTML ) already does hardware accelerated blending of alpha pixmaps .
Boyah !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Konqueror (with KHTML) already does hardware accelerated blending of alpha pixmaps.
Boyah!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074</id>
	<title>Speed Kills (play it safe - buy a Chevy)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264107360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>..adds further performance improvements to the new Tracemonkey Javascript engine. One of the major goals of the release was to improve startup time and general UI responsiveness, especially the Awesomebar.</p></div><p>Call me when you get in the ballpark of Opera &amp; Chrome.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>..adds further performance improvements to the new Tracemonkey Javascript engine .
One of the major goals of the release was to improve startup time and general UI responsiveness , especially the Awesomebar.Call me when you get in the ballpark of Opera &amp; Chrome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ..adds further performance improvements to the new Tracemonkey Javascript engine.
One of the major goals of the release was to improve startup time and general UI responsiveness, especially the Awesomebar.Call me when you get in the ballpark of Opera &amp; Chrome.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850578</id>
	<title>Firefox will never have what Chromium always did</title>
	<author>AlexLibman</author>
	<datestamp>1264066140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=19771" title="freestateproject.org" rel="nofollow"> <b>Freedom!</b> </a> [freestateproject.org]</p><p><a href="http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Chromium's license and dependencies are almost 100\% restriction-free BSD</a> [google.com].  You can do whatever you want with it - without the fear that the Copyleft gang will drag you to court and make you waste millions on your defense and/or product launch delays / cancellations!</p><p>Firefox and its dependencies are locked away behind an iron wall of Copyleft and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla\_Public\_License" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">other restrictions</a> [wikipedia.org].  Every person who cares about personal liberty and free enterprise should use Chromium (or a less Google-entangled fork of it) instead!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Freedom !
[ freestateproject.org ] Chromium 's license and dependencies are almost 100 \ % restriction-free BSD [ google.com ] .
You can do whatever you want with it - without the fear that the Copyleft gang will drag you to court and make you waste millions on your defense and/or product launch delays / cancellations ! Firefox and its dependencies are locked away behind an iron wall of Copyleft and other restrictions [ wikipedia.org ] .
Every person who cares about personal liberty and free enterprise should use Chromium ( or a less Google-entangled fork of it ) instead !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Freedom!
[freestateproject.org]Chromium's license and dependencies are almost 100\% restriction-free BSD [google.com].
You can do whatever you want with it - without the fear that the Copyleft gang will drag you to court and make you waste millions on your defense and/or product launch delays / cancellations!Firefox and its dependencies are locked away behind an iron wall of Copyleft and other restrictions [wikipedia.org].
Every person who cares about personal liberty and free enterprise should use Chromium (or a less Google-entangled fork of it) instead!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850690</id>
	<title>Leaks, plug-in leaks, or caches?</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1264066500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Cheburator-2 has a point. Does Firefox leak even when you use Flashblock, NoScript, or another extension that implements a whitelist for a popular but leaky plug-in?
</p><p>
Even if your web browser reaches 1 GB, does it cause your computer to thrash swap? If not, there's no problem. It's supposed to be that big; a lot of the memory is used for cached pages from history (press Alt+Left), recently closed tabs (press Ctrl+Shift+T), and recently closed windows (press Ctrl+Shift+N).
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cheburator-2 has a point .
Does Firefox leak even when you use Flashblock , NoScript , or another extension that implements a whitelist for a popular but leaky plug-in ?
Even if your web browser reaches 1 GB , does it cause your computer to thrash swap ?
If not , there 's no problem .
It 's supposed to be that big ; a lot of the memory is used for cached pages from history ( press Alt + Left ) , recently closed tabs ( press Ctrl + Shift + T ) , and recently closed windows ( press Ctrl + Shift + N ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Cheburator-2 has a point.
Does Firefox leak even when you use Flashblock, NoScript, or another extension that implements a whitelist for a popular but leaky plug-in?
Even if your web browser reaches 1 GB, does it cause your computer to thrash swap?
If not, there's no problem.
It's supposed to be that big; a lot of the memory is used for cached pages from history (press Alt+Left), recently closed tabs (press Ctrl+Shift+T), and recently closed windows (press Ctrl+Shift+N).
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850088</id>
	<title>Pretty neat.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264107420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tried on Windows, performance improvements are immediately noticeable. Wastes less screen space by default. For those who are used to the old look-and-feel can feel a little awkward at first.<br> <br>
Set extensions.checkCompatibility to false and you're good to go.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tried on Windows , performance improvements are immediately noticeable .
Wastes less screen space by default .
For those who are used to the old look-and-feel can feel a little awkward at first .
Set extensions.checkCompatibility to false and you 're good to go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tried on Windows, performance improvements are immediately noticeable.
Wastes less screen space by default.
For those who are used to the old look-and-feel can feel a little awkward at first.
Set extensions.checkCompatibility to false and you're good to go.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856442</id>
	<title>Re:Personas, lightweight themes?</title>
	<author>Draek</author>
	<datestamp>1264096320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Than which OS? because WinXP, Win7, OSX, Linux/GNOME and Linux/KDE all look different from each other, so obviously they can't design for all of them at the same time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Than which OS ?
because WinXP , Win7 , OSX , Linux/GNOME and Linux/KDE all look different from each other , so obviously they ca n't design for all of them at the same time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Than which OS?
because WinXP, Win7, OSX, Linux/GNOME and Linux/KDE all look different from each other, so obviously they can't design for all of them at the same time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30900942</id>
	<title>xkcd viewers thank you</title>
	<author>Phorion</author>
	<datestamp>1264448580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Best new feature: title text (the tooltip that appears when you hover over an image) no longer disappears after a few seconds.
Now I can read xkcd without the fear that comes from knowing I'll soon have to wiggle the mouse around to get the tooltip back.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Best new feature : title text ( the tooltip that appears when you hover over an image ) no longer disappears after a few seconds .
Now I can read xkcd without the fear that comes from knowing I 'll soon have to wiggle the mouse around to get the tooltip back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Best new feature: title text (the tooltip that appears when you hover over an image) no longer disappears after a few seconds.
Now I can read xkcd without the fear that comes from knowing I'll soon have to wiggle the mouse around to get the tooltip back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851432</id>
	<title>Re:Open Link in New Tab changed</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1264068720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good, because that's how everyone else (i.e. IE, Chrome, Opera) have been doing it for a while now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good , because that 's how everyone else ( i.e .
IE , Chrome , Opera ) have been doing it for a while now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good, because that's how everyone else (i.e.
IE, Chrome, Opera) have been doing it for a while now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30853932</id>
	<title>Non-admin updates?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264077060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I appear to be able to check for updates as a non-admin now.  Anyone else finally able to do so?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I appear to be able to check for updates as a non-admin now .
Anyone else finally able to do so ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I appear to be able to check for updates as a non-admin now.
Anyone else finally able to do so?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851058</id>
	<title>Re:How about fixing the Memory leaks?</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1264067640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Next time close your failbook tab. They have memory leaks in their javascript.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next time close your failbook tab .
They have memory leaks in their javascript .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next time close your failbook tab.
They have memory leaks in their javascript.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851034</id>
	<title>ThiVs is goat5ex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264067580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>from the FrreBSD distribution.  As</htmltext>
<tokenext>from the FrreBSD distribution .
As</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from the FrreBSD distribution.
As</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850294</id>
	<title>Re:Speed Kills (play it safe - buy a Chevy)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264065060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just downloaded it - it's just as fast as Chrome or even faster. Typing this from shiny new browser.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just downloaded it - it 's just as fast as Chrome or even faster .
Typing this from shiny new browser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just downloaded it - it's just as fast as Chrome or even faster.
Typing this from shiny new browser.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30852892</id>
	<title>Re:GPU accelerated Firefox?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264073160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GPGPU stuff requires driver support.<br>Do you want to upgrade your fucking graphics drivers to run each new browser release?<br>Ok, so I shouldn't ask you because you do, but here's news: no one else does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GPGPU stuff requires driver support.Do you want to upgrade your fucking graphics drivers to run each new browser release ? Ok , so I should n't ask you because you do , but here 's news : no one else does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GPGPU stuff requires driver support.Do you want to upgrade your fucking graphics drivers to run each new browser release?Ok, so I shouldn't ask you because you do, but here's news: no one else does.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850966</id>
	<title>Re:Speed Kills (play it safe - buy a Chevy)</title>
	<author>Gordo\_1</author>
	<datestamp>1264067340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Brring, brring...</p><p>You have an annoying ringtone. Oh and by the way, stop basing your performance expectations on javascript benchmarks and actually go out and use your browser to browse real websites. Call me back when you discover one that doesn't load in the same "ballpark" as Opera and Chrome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Brring , brring...You have an annoying ringtone .
Oh and by the way , stop basing your performance expectations on javascript benchmarks and actually go out and use your browser to browse real websites .
Call me back when you discover one that does n't load in the same " ballpark " as Opera and Chrome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brring, brring...You have an annoying ringtone.
Oh and by the way, stop basing your performance expectations on javascript benchmarks and actually go out and use your browser to browse real websites.
Call me back when you discover one that doesn't load in the same "ballpark" as Opera and Chrome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851974</id>
	<title>CSS Updates</title>
	<author>WebmasterNeal</author>
	<datestamp>1264070280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The intro is forgetting the best updates of all, support for CSS gradients and  multiple backgrounds in CSS.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The intro is forgetting the best updates of all , support for CSS gradients and multiple backgrounds in CSS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The intro is forgetting the best updates of all, support for CSS gradients and  multiple backgrounds in CSS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856028</id>
	<title>Still having a fine time with Firefox 3.7a1pre</title>
	<author>haaz</author>
	<datestamp>1264091940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A.k.a. <a href="http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/" title="mozilla.org" rel="nofollow">"Minefield."</a> [mozilla.org] Despite the name, it's been completely stable for me. In fact, I'm using it right now. Works fine. I sometimes miss the History function, though it remembers the sites I've visited. So I have no complaints. The speed gain over 3.5 is phenomenal. Between Mac OS X 10.6 and Minefield, I'm a happy camper.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A.k.a .
" Minefield. " [ mozilla.org ] Despite the name , it 's been completely stable for me .
In fact , I 'm using it right now .
Works fine .
I sometimes miss the History function , though it remembers the sites I 've visited .
So I have no complaints .
The speed gain over 3.5 is phenomenal .
Between Mac OS X 10.6 and Minefield , I 'm a happy camper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A.k.a.
"Minefield." [mozilla.org] Despite the name, it's been completely stable for me.
In fact, I'm using it right now.
Works fine.
I sometimes miss the History function, though it remembers the sites I've visited.
So I have no complaints.
The speed gain over 3.5 is phenomenal.
Between Mac OS X 10.6 and Minefield, I'm a happy camper.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30901330</id>
	<title>Re:Switch Proxy Tool</title>
	<author>Cato</author>
	<datestamp>1264539300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For those who just need to switch between a proxy and direct connection - try QuickProxy, <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1557" title="mozilla.org">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1557</a> [mozilla.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those who just need to switch between a proxy and direct connection - try QuickProxy , https : //addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1557 [ mozilla.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those who just need to switch between a proxy and direct connection - try QuickProxy, https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1557 [mozilla.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30858266</id>
	<title>Re:Personas...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264165500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yo fawx, we heard you like themes so we put a theme in your theme so you can theme while you theme...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yo fawx , we heard you like themes so we put a theme in your theme so you can theme while you theme.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yo fawx, we heard you like themes so we put a theme in your theme so you can theme while you theme...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850438</id>
	<title>Where can I download this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264065540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The firewall at work graciously has blocked all Mozilla downloads (and most other popular DL sites).  Does anybody have a link to an obscure site hosting the Windows version that will likely not be blocked? thanks....

Go figure while work blocks my download the workstations are open to install sw....</htmltext>
<tokenext>The firewall at work graciously has blocked all Mozilla downloads ( and most other popular DL sites ) .
Does anybody have a link to an obscure site hosting the Windows version that will likely not be blocked ?
thanks... . Go figure while work blocks my download the workstations are open to install sw... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The firewall at work graciously has blocked all Mozilla downloads (and most other popular DL sites).
Does anybody have a link to an obscure site hosting the Windows version that will likely not be blocked?
thanks....

Go figure while work blocks my download the workstations are open to install sw....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851524</id>
	<title>Easier, Competitive with Chrome</title>
	<author>CritterNYC</author>
	<datestamp>1264068960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Folks like being able to customize their browser.  Chrome had been using this as one of its selling points in their online ads.  Personas are simpler than themes and can be easily switched in and out.  They don't require a reboot to apply.  And you can try them out right on the site.  So, we're likely to see more work going into personas than themes.  You can see that there are about 400 Firefox themes available. And 35,000 personas.  So, that's where the work is going.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Folks like being able to customize their browser .
Chrome had been using this as one of its selling points in their online ads .
Personas are simpler than themes and can be easily switched in and out .
They do n't require a reboot to apply .
And you can try them out right on the site .
So , we 're likely to see more work going into personas than themes .
You can see that there are about 400 Firefox themes available .
And 35,000 personas .
So , that 's where the work is going .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Folks like being able to customize their browser.
Chrome had been using this as one of its selling points in their online ads.
Personas are simpler than themes and can be easily switched in and out.
They don't require a reboot to apply.
And you can try them out right on the site.
So, we're likely to see more work going into personas than themes.
You can see that there are about 400 Firefox themes available.
And 35,000 personas.
So, that's where the work is going.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851912</id>
	<title>Re:Open Link in New Tab changed</title>
	<author>bkaul01</author>
	<datestamp>1264070100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great, one less extension I have to install now! (Tabs Open Relative was usually the second thing I installed after Adblock Plus up til now).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , one less extension I have to install now !
( Tabs Open Relative was usually the second thing I installed after Adblock Plus up til now ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, one less extension I have to install now!
(Tabs Open Relative was usually the second thing I installed after Adblock Plus up til now).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851072</id>
	<title>Re:GPU accelerated Firefox?</title>
	<author>Cap'n Refsmmat</author>
	<datestamp>1264067700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is being investigated, in fact. Work is being done to use Direct2D for hardware acceleration in Vista and 7.

<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=527707" title="mozilla.org" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=527707</a> [mozilla.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is being investigated , in fact .
Work is being done to use Direct2D for hardware acceleration in Vista and 7 . https : //bugzilla.mozilla.org/show \ _bug.cgi ? id = 527707 [ mozilla.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is being investigated, in fact.
Work is being done to use Direct2D for hardware acceleration in Vista and 7.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=527707 [mozilla.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30857182</id>
	<title>threads</title>
	<author>jdc18</author>
	<datestamp>1264192500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this one supports threads per tab like chrome or opera or even ie8</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this one supports threads per tab like chrome or opera or even ie8</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this one supports threads per tab like chrome or opera or even ie8</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851352</id>
	<title>Just updated...</title>
	<author>zullnero</author>
	<datestamp>1264068480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nice.  Noticeably snappier.  I like the idea of a path to themes I can apply without having to restart the browser.  Browsing for the perfect theme will take a whole lot less time.  The browser still takes up a bit of memory, but it's about what I expected.  Just wish I could properly compare it to IE8 in Win7 without feeling like Microsoft is artificially deflating its memory usage numbers by offloading work into "operating system" processes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice .
Noticeably snappier .
I like the idea of a path to themes I can apply without having to restart the browser .
Browsing for the perfect theme will take a whole lot less time .
The browser still takes up a bit of memory , but it 's about what I expected .
Just wish I could properly compare it to IE8 in Win7 without feeling like Microsoft is artificially deflating its memory usage numbers by offloading work into " operating system " processes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice.
Noticeably snappier.
I like the idea of a path to themes I can apply without having to restart the browser.
Browsing for the perfect theme will take a whole lot less time.
The browser still takes up a bit of memory, but it's about what I expected.
Just wish I could properly compare it to IE8 in Win7 without feeling like Microsoft is artificially deflating its memory usage numbers by offloading work into "operating system" processes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850576</id>
	<title>Re:Javascript performance</title>
	<author>amigabill</author>
	<datestamp>1264066080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why hasn't anyone gotten clever and made Firefox use Chrome's faster Javascript code? Porting it to Firefox and all that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why has n't anyone gotten clever and made Firefox use Chrome 's faster Javascript code ?
Porting it to Firefox and all that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why hasn't anyone gotten clever and made Firefox use Chrome's faster Javascript code?
Porting it to Firefox and all that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30868572</id>
	<title>Re:Personas, lightweight themes?</title>
	<author>deniable</author>
	<datestamp>1264249500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, at least they've made new tabs work like IE. If I wanted IE, I'd be running it. Gotta love random, unexplained 'fixes.'</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , at least they 've made new tabs work like IE .
If I wanted IE , I 'd be running it .
Got ta love random , unexplained 'fixes .
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, at least they've made new tabs work like IE.
If I wanted IE, I'd be running it.
Gotta love random, unexplained 'fixes.
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30852484</id>
	<title>No Tab Preview</title>
	<author>CodeInspired</author>
	<datestamp>1264071900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a shame they didn't support the tab preview options on the Windows 7 task bar.  I know many Windows 7 users that switched back to IE just for that reason.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a shame they did n't support the tab preview options on the Windows 7 task bar .
I know many Windows 7 users that switched back to IE just for that reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a shame they didn't support the tab preview options on the Windows 7 task bar.
I know many Windows 7 users that switched back to IE just for that reason.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30852008</id>
	<title>Re:Speed Kills (play it safe - buy a Chevy)</title>
	<author>phantomcircuit</author>
	<datestamp>1264070400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chrome still has bugs</p><p>For example it's handling of importNode on &lt;input type="file"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/&gt; elements.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chrome still has bugsFor example it 's handling of importNode on / &gt; elements .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chrome still has bugsFor example it's handling of importNode on  /&gt; elements.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851618</id>
	<title>Re:Javascript performance</title>
	<author>HeronBlademaster</author>
	<datestamp>1264069260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TBH I stopped caring about Javascript benchmarks (and benchmarks in general, really) when I realized you can pick benchmarks that happen to reflect the result you want to "prove".</p><p>For example, someone else linked to <a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/17199/1/" title="fudzilla.com">this</a> [fudzilla.com] benchmark (Futuremark's Peacekeeper) which puts Firefox 3.6 solidly <i>ahead</i> of Chrome.</p><p>Honest question: are Sunspider and V8 better than Peacekeeper?  What real-world scenarios are reflected by which benchmarks?  If I want a benchmark that reflects performance relevant to my normal usage, which benchmark should I rely on?  If you don't know, how would I find out?  ("Read the benchmark code yourself" is not helpful.)</p><p>Honest question: besides Google Docs, what real-world scenario actually <i>needs</i> super-fast Javascript performance?  For most use cases I can think of, we're not talking about noticeable delays...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TBH I stopped caring about Javascript benchmarks ( and benchmarks in general , really ) when I realized you can pick benchmarks that happen to reflect the result you want to " prove " .For example , someone else linked to this [ fudzilla.com ] benchmark ( Futuremark 's Peacekeeper ) which puts Firefox 3.6 solidly ahead of Chrome.Honest question : are Sunspider and V8 better than Peacekeeper ?
What real-world scenarios are reflected by which benchmarks ?
If I want a benchmark that reflects performance relevant to my normal usage , which benchmark should I rely on ?
If you do n't know , how would I find out ?
( " Read the benchmark code yourself " is not helpful .
) Honest question : besides Google Docs , what real-world scenario actually needs super-fast Javascript performance ?
For most use cases I can think of , we 're not talking about noticeable delays.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TBH I stopped caring about Javascript benchmarks (and benchmarks in general, really) when I realized you can pick benchmarks that happen to reflect the result you want to "prove".For example, someone else linked to this [fudzilla.com] benchmark (Futuremark's Peacekeeper) which puts Firefox 3.6 solidly ahead of Chrome.Honest question: are Sunspider and V8 better than Peacekeeper?
What real-world scenarios are reflected by which benchmarks?
If I want a benchmark that reflects performance relevant to my normal usage, which benchmark should I rely on?
If you don't know, how would I find out?
("Read the benchmark code yourself" is not helpful.
)Honest question: besides Google Docs, what real-world scenario actually needs super-fast Javascript performance?
For most use cases I can think of, we're not talking about noticeable delays...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851730</id>
	<title>Cookie prompts</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264069560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please tell me I can deal with cookie prompts asynchronously now, instead getting a modal dialog for ever single image on a page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please tell me I can deal with cookie prompts asynchronously now , instead getting a modal dialog for ever single image on a page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please tell me I can deal with cookie prompts asynchronously now, instead getting a modal dialog for ever single image on a page.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30868586</id>
	<title>Re:Open Link in New Tab changed</title>
	<author>deniable</author>
	<datestamp>1264249980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Randomly changing UI behavior without warning is the way MS has been doing it for a while too. Glad to see Mozilla catching up. What's next, a ribbon?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Randomly changing UI behavior without warning is the way MS has been doing it for a while too .
Glad to see Mozilla catching up .
What 's next , a ribbon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Randomly changing UI behavior without warning is the way MS has been doing it for a while too.
Glad to see Mozilla catching up.
What's next, a ribbon?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850440</id>
	<title>It's extensions.checkCompatibility.3.6</title>
	<author>wiredog</author>
	<datestamp>1264065540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See<a href="http://kb.mozillazine.org/Extensions.checkCompatibility" title="mozillazine.org">this</a> [mozillazine.org] for details.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seethis [ mozillazine.org ] for details .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seethis [mozillazine.org] for details.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856758</id>
	<title>Re:GPU accelerated Firefox?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264100520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It does on certain OSes.  Cairo for instance will use hardware acceleration in Windows.  Not sure if FF for windows takes advantage of it, but it certainly could.</p><p>As a general rule however, browsers don't really need this sort of thing, thats changed recently though.</p><p>Its not really going to give Firefox an edge however, IE already does it in Windows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does on certain OSes .
Cairo for instance will use hardware acceleration in Windows .
Not sure if FF for windows takes advantage of it , but it certainly could.As a general rule however , browsers do n't really need this sort of thing , thats changed recently though.Its not really going to give Firefox an edge however , IE already does it in Windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It does on certain OSes.
Cairo for instance will use hardware acceleration in Windows.
Not sure if FF for windows takes advantage of it, but it certainly could.As a general rule however, browsers don't really need this sort of thing, thats changed recently though.Its not really going to give Firefox an edge however, IE already does it in Windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30862202</id>
	<title>Re:Personas, lightweight themes?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264190520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Proof that Firefox is heading for doom. Stop wasting time on making the browser look different than the fucking OS you idiots.</p></div><p>I wonder why so many ppl act like aggro-fucktards on the internet.  Would this person, presented with the firefox dev team, seriously say what they just posted?  Somehow, I think they would be quite a bit more tactful.  Or not, and then i'd have to ask why some ppl are such aggro-fucktards.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Proof that Firefox is heading for doom .
Stop wasting time on making the browser look different than the fucking OS you idiots.I wonder why so many ppl act like aggro-fucktards on the internet .
Would this person , presented with the firefox dev team , seriously say what they just posted ?
Somehow , I think they would be quite a bit more tactful .
Or not , and then i 'd have to ask why some ppl are such aggro-fucktards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Proof that Firefox is heading for doom.
Stop wasting time on making the browser look different than the fucking OS you idiots.I wonder why so many ppl act like aggro-fucktards on the internet.
Would this person, presented with the firefox dev team, seriously say what they just posted?
Somehow, I think they would be quite a bit more tactful.
Or not, and then i'd have to ask why some ppl are such aggro-fucktards.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850624</id>
	<title>Re:How can I upgrade on Ubuntu?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1264066320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait until the maintainers put a package in the repository, then update like usual.  It's generally not worth installing unofficial packages if an official one is forthcoming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait until the maintainers put a package in the repository , then update like usual .
It 's generally not worth installing unofficial packages if an official one is forthcoming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait until the maintainers put a package in the repository, then update like usual.
It's generally not worth installing unofficial packages if an official one is forthcoming.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850298</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850106</id>
	<title>The competition is heating up!!</title>
	<author>igadget78</author>
	<datestamp>1264107480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Microsoft's patch vs. Mozilla's release.

I can't wait. The Excitement is almost too much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft 's patch vs. Mozilla 's release .
I ca n't wait .
The Excitement is almost too much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft's patch vs. Mozilla's release.
I can't wait.
The Excitement is almost too much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851082</id>
	<title>Re:GPU accelerated Firefox?</title>
	<author>MarcQuadra</author>
	<datestamp>1264067700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Firefox is based on Gecko, which uses Cairo Graphics, which has an accelerated OpenGL back-end as an output option.</p><p>My guess is that performance when using an OpenGL-accelerated renderer is actually -worse- on non-compositing window managers.</p><p>The rendering of pages wouldn't be helped by GPGPU stuff, since it's 'procedural' to parse and render HTML, it's not SIMD in nature.</p><p>Apple's been sitting on accelerated 2D rendering of the UI, glyphs, text, and primitives for over four years now, it's not a panacea. I don't think Firefox would be improved if it started depending on video drivers, 3D hardware, and was slower.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Firefox is based on Gecko , which uses Cairo Graphics , which has an accelerated OpenGL back-end as an output option.My guess is that performance when using an OpenGL-accelerated renderer is actually -worse- on non-compositing window managers.The rendering of pages would n't be helped by GPGPU stuff , since it 's 'procedural ' to parse and render HTML , it 's not SIMD in nature.Apple 's been sitting on accelerated 2D rendering of the UI , glyphs , text , and primitives for over four years now , it 's not a panacea .
I do n't think Firefox would be improved if it started depending on video drivers , 3D hardware , and was slower .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Firefox is based on Gecko, which uses Cairo Graphics, which has an accelerated OpenGL back-end as an output option.My guess is that performance when using an OpenGL-accelerated renderer is actually -worse- on non-compositing window managers.The rendering of pages wouldn't be helped by GPGPU stuff, since it's 'procedural' to parse and render HTML, it's not SIMD in nature.Apple's been sitting on accelerated 2D rendering of the UI, glyphs, text, and primitives for over four years now, it's not a panacea.
I don't think Firefox would be improved if it started depending on video drivers, 3D hardware, and was slower.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850796</id>
	<title>Re:Javascript performance</title>
	<author>GabboFlabbo</author>
	<datestamp>1264066800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In your comparison, you are using a beta version of Chrome.  How is that a fair comparison?</htmltext>
<tokenext>In your comparison , you are using a beta version of Chrome .
How is that a fair comparison ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In your comparison, you are using a beta version of Chrome.
How is that a fair comparison?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30853076</id>
	<title>Only a Minor Update - but major features</title>
	<author>darthcamaro</author>
	<datestamp>1264073880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the best part of the Firefox 3.6 update is that it's offered to existing 3.5.x users. Not one of those weird 'major updates' like 3.5 was - which is why there are still 3.0.x users out there running old browsers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>the best part of the Firefox 3.6 update is that it 's offered to existing 3.5.x users .
Not one of those weird 'major updates ' like 3.5 was - which is why there are still 3.0.x users out there running old browsers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the best part of the Firefox 3.6 update is that it's offered to existing 3.5.x users.
Not one of those weird 'major updates' like 3.5 was - which is why there are still 3.0.x users out there running old browsers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851972</id>
	<title>Perfect</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264070280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yet ANOTHER update that has to install when I start FireFox. Like we don't have enough already.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet ANOTHER update that has to install when I start FireFox .
Like we do n't have enough already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet ANOTHER update that has to install when I start FireFox.
Like we don't have enough already.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850978</id>
	<title>Re:How can I upgrade on Ubuntu?</title>
	<author>Knuckles</author>
	<datestamp>1264067400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How can I upgrade on Ubuntu?</p></div><p>It won't appear in the main distribution until the new distro release 10.04 (current Codename Lucid Lynx). Possibly someone will stick it into the backports repository (which you would have to enable) or into a PPA (likewise).</p><p>If you can't wait, install into<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/usr/local from mozilla.com (use checkinstall to create a basic deb package so that the package manager knows about it).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can I upgrade on Ubuntu ? It wo n't appear in the main distribution until the new distro release 10.04 ( current Codename Lucid Lynx ) .
Possibly someone will stick it into the backports repository ( which you would have to enable ) or into a PPA ( likewise ) .If you ca n't wait , install into /usr/local from mozilla.com ( use checkinstall to create a basic deb package so that the package manager knows about it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can I upgrade on Ubuntu?It won't appear in the main distribution until the new distro release 10.04 (current Codename Lucid Lynx).
Possibly someone will stick it into the backports repository (which you would have to enable) or into a PPA (likewise).If you can't wait, install into /usr/local from mozilla.com (use checkinstall to create a basic deb package so that the package manager knows about it).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850298</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30858608</id>
	<title>Re:Switch Proxy Tool</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1264170600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Hopefully the lower-contrast, prettier ones will become the most popular and easier to find.</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully the lower-contrast , prettier ones will become the most popular and easier to find .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully the lower-contrast, prettier ones will become the most popular and easier to find.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851144</id>
	<title>Re:Switch Proxy Tool</title>
	<author>chrysrobyn</author>
	<datestamp>1264067880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If you have the Switch Proxy Tool, I strongly suggest you disable it. Caused all sort of issues when upgrading. If you've already upgraded, right click on the shortcut and run in safe mode, there you can disable it. YMMV.</p></div></blockquote><p>Then I'll just have to wait.  At work, I ssh tunnel 95\% of my traffic home and bounce it off my Apache server there.  It's not fast (by design -- I need to limit my compulsive habits somehow).  On occasion, I need to get to stuff fast, like big updates and PDF files.  Switch Proxy and FlashBlock are my two reasons for using Firefox.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have the Switch Proxy Tool , I strongly suggest you disable it .
Caused all sort of issues when upgrading .
If you 've already upgraded , right click on the shortcut and run in safe mode , there you can disable it .
YMMV.Then I 'll just have to wait .
At work , I ssh tunnel 95 \ % of my traffic home and bounce it off my Apache server there .
It 's not fast ( by design -- I need to limit my compulsive habits somehow ) .
On occasion , I need to get to stuff fast , like big updates and PDF files .
Switch Proxy and FlashBlock are my two reasons for using Firefox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have the Switch Proxy Tool, I strongly suggest you disable it.
Caused all sort of issues when upgrading.
If you've already upgraded, right click on the shortcut and run in safe mode, there you can disable it.
YMMV.Then I'll just have to wait.
At work, I ssh tunnel 95\% of my traffic home and bounce it off my Apache server there.
It's not fast (by design -- I need to limit my compulsive habits somehow).
On occasion, I need to get to stuff fast, like big updates and PDF files.
Switch Proxy and FlashBlock are my two reasons for using Firefox.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850594</id>
	<title>Scrolling</title>
	<author>Majix</author>
	<datestamp>1264066140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems the mouse wheel scrolling has been changed in 3.6. It's moving a much larger distance with each "click" of the wheel than before and if you scroll continuously it seems to accelerate even faster. My first impression is that I don't like it at all. It feels a lot more like Chrome, which isn't a good thing in my opinion, the annoying jumpy scrolling is one of the primary reasons I prefer not to use Chrome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems the mouse wheel scrolling has been changed in 3.6 .
It 's moving a much larger distance with each " click " of the wheel than before and if you scroll continuously it seems to accelerate even faster .
My first impression is that I do n't like it at all .
It feels a lot more like Chrome , which is n't a good thing in my opinion , the annoying jumpy scrolling is one of the primary reasons I prefer not to use Chrome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems the mouse wheel scrolling has been changed in 3.6.
It's moving a much larger distance with each "click" of the wheel than before and if you scroll continuously it seems to accelerate even faster.
My first impression is that I don't like it at all.
It feels a lot more like Chrome, which isn't a good thing in my opinion, the annoying jumpy scrolling is one of the primary reasons I prefer not to use Chrome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30865660</id>
	<title>Re:Scrolling</title>
	<author>tenco</author>
	<datestamp>1264167720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not here. It's as it was with 3.5.7: no acceleration. Did you update or reinstall?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not here .
It 's as it was with 3.5.7 : no acceleration .
Did you update or reinstall ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not here.
It's as it was with 3.5.7: no acceleration.
Did you update or reinstall?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850236</id>
	<title>Just used Chrome</title>
	<author>treeves</author>
	<datestamp>1264064880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>to download Firefox 3.6. I regularly use both. Just happened to be using Chrome when I came across this story and decided to upgrade Firefox. I used to use Opera a lot. Not sure why I stopped and why I can't stick with one browser. I guess Chrome took Opera's place as the lighter, faster browser for me while I keep using FF for the extensions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>to download Firefox 3.6 .
I regularly use both .
Just happened to be using Chrome when I came across this story and decided to upgrade Firefox .
I used to use Opera a lot .
Not sure why I stopped and why I ca n't stick with one browser .
I guess Chrome took Opera 's place as the lighter , faster browser for me while I keep using FF for the extensions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to download Firefox 3.6.
I regularly use both.
Just happened to be using Chrome when I came across this story and decided to upgrade Firefox.
I used to use Opera a lot.
Not sure why I stopped and why I can't stick with one browser.
I guess Chrome took Opera's place as the lighter, faster browser for me while I keep using FF for the extensions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851962</id>
	<title>Management by Group Policy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264070280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be nice if Firefox could be controlled/locked down using Windows Group Policies. That would make Firefox more corporate-friendly.</p><p>The main reason that my employers' IT dept doesn't allow Firefox is the fact that they cannon force all traffic through a filtering proxy (bluecoat).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be nice if Firefox could be controlled/locked down using Windows Group Policies .
That would make Firefox more corporate-friendly.The main reason that my employers ' IT dept does n't allow Firefox is the fact that they cannon force all traffic through a filtering proxy ( bluecoat ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be nice if Firefox could be controlled/locked down using Windows Group Policies.
That would make Firefox more corporate-friendly.The main reason that my employers' IT dept doesn't allow Firefox is the fact that they cannon force all traffic through a filtering proxy (bluecoat).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850908</id>
	<title>I use QuickProxy</title>
	<author>JoshDM</author>
	<datestamp>1264067220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SwitchProxy stopped working for me on one of the other FF upgrades, so I gave it up for QuickProxy, which also requires less babysitting and is easier for me to use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SwitchProxy stopped working for me on one of the other FF upgrades , so I gave it up for QuickProxy , which also requires less babysitting and is easier for me to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SwitchProxy stopped working for me on one of the other FF upgrades, so I gave it up for QuickProxy, which also requires less babysitting and is easier for me to use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851910</id>
	<title>Re:Switch Proxy Tool</title>
	<author>mujadaddy</author>
	<datestamp>1264070100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have SwitchProxy, and when I tried upgrading from 3.0 to 3.6 just now, I encountered the following:<ul> <li>Mouse left-clicking disabled</li><li>Mouse scroll-wheel disabled</li><li>Gmail + Google Docs: Scrollbar appears on LEFT edge of screen</li><li>Gmail Chat: cannot connect</li><li>NoScript right-click menu items have no text</li></ul><p>
Bear in mind that this is all with SwitchProxy set to use *NO PROXY*<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I uninstalled and reinstalled 3.0</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have SwitchProxy , and when I tried upgrading from 3.0 to 3.6 just now , I encountered the following : Mouse left-clicking disabledMouse scroll-wheel disabledGmail + Google Docs : Scrollbar appears on LEFT edge of screenGmail Chat : can not connectNoScript right-click menu items have no text Bear in mind that this is all with SwitchProxy set to use * NO PROXY * ... I uninstalled and reinstalled 3.0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have SwitchProxy, and when I tried upgrading from 3.0 to 3.6 just now, I encountered the following: Mouse left-clicking disabledMouse scroll-wheel disabledGmail + Google Docs: Scrollbar appears on LEFT edge of screenGmail Chat: cannot connectNoScript right-click menu items have no text
Bear in mind that this is all with SwitchProxy set to use *NO PROXY* ... I uninstalled and reinstalled 3.0</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851284</id>
	<title>Firefox Fanboys == Internet Explorer Fanboys</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264068240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2010 Firefox Fanboys:</p><p>"Just downloaded it - it's just as fast as Chrome or even faster. Typing this from shiny new browser."</p><p>2000 Internet Explorer Fanboys:</p><p>"Just downloaded it - it's just as safe as Firefox or safer. Typing this from shiny new browser."</p><p>Do we pity or just laugh at the delusional sods still clinging to the turd of a browser that Firefox is?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2010 Firefox Fanboys : " Just downloaded it - it 's just as fast as Chrome or even faster .
Typing this from shiny new browser .
" 2000 Internet Explorer Fanboys : " Just downloaded it - it 's just as safe as Firefox or safer .
Typing this from shiny new browser .
" Do we pity or just laugh at the delusional sods still clinging to the turd of a browser that Firefox is ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2010 Firefox Fanboys:"Just downloaded it - it's just as fast as Chrome or even faster.
Typing this from shiny new browser.
"2000 Internet Explorer Fanboys:"Just downloaded it - it's just as safe as Firefox or safer.
Typing this from shiny new browser.
"Do we pity or just laugh at the delusional sods still clinging to the turd of a browser that Firefox is?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850294</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850930</id>
	<title>Personas...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264067280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Mozilla has released Firefox 3.6 today, which adds support for <b>Personas, lightweight themes that can be installed without restarting the browser</b></p> </div><p>I think someone just jumped the shark.</p><p>I can't explain to myself how adding a theme engine on top of <i>another</i> theme engine was somehow near the top of their todo list.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mozilla has released Firefox 3.6 today , which adds support for Personas , lightweight themes that can be installed without restarting the browser I think someone just jumped the shark.I ca n't explain to myself how adding a theme engine on top of another theme engine was somehow near the top of their todo list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mozilla has released Firefox 3.6 today, which adds support for Personas, lightweight themes that can be installed without restarting the browser I think someone just jumped the shark.I can't explain to myself how adding a theme engine on top of another theme engine was somehow near the top of their todo list.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30852166</id>
	<title>Re:Personas, lightweight themes?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264070880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Stop wasting time on making the browser look different than the fucking OS you idiots.</p></div><p>Hear, hear, goddamnit, HEAR! Consistency is an essential quality of a good user interface. That's why I could never really stand Opera: you can make it look like anything, but good luck making it look like it belongs. And that's why I love Safari on the Mac, yet hate it on Windows: it looks alien to the system around it.</p><p>Here's a tip -- go to the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/browse/type:2/cat:all?sort=popular" title="mozilla.org"> <b>themes page</b> </a> [mozilla.org] and look for something that fits your OS. Looks like custom themes are immune to this Persona shit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop wasting time on making the browser look different than the fucking OS you idiots.Hear , hear , goddamnit , HEAR !
Consistency is an essential quality of a good user interface .
That 's why I could never really stand Opera : you can make it look like anything , but good luck making it look like it belongs .
And that 's why I love Safari on the Mac , yet hate it on Windows : it looks alien to the system around it.Here 's a tip -- go to the themes page [ mozilla.org ] and look for something that fits your OS .
Looks like custom themes are immune to this Persona shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop wasting time on making the browser look different than the fucking OS you idiots.Hear, hear, goddamnit, HEAR!
Consistency is an essential quality of a good user interface.
That's why I could never really stand Opera: you can make it look like anything, but good luck making it look like it belongs.
And that's why I love Safari on the Mac, yet hate it on Windows: it looks alien to the system around it.Here's a tip -- go to the  themes page  [mozilla.org] and look for something that fits your OS.
Looks like custom themes are immune to this Persona shit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850184</id>
	<title>January 11th called</title>
	<author>Adolf Hipster</author>
	<datestamp>1264064640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They want their old news back.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They want their old news back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They want their old news back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850560</id>
	<title>Re:Speed Kills (play it safe - buy a Chevy)</title>
	<author>MonsterTrimble</author>
	<datestamp>1264066080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sweet - I didn't get Nukemodded with an INTENTIONAL flamebait subject line. </p><p>It's a good day.</p><p>Actually I have nothing against Firefox - I just find Opera &amp; Chrome superior.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sweet - I did n't get Nukemodded with an INTENTIONAL flamebait subject line .
It 's a good day.Actually I have nothing against Firefox - I just find Opera &amp; Chrome superior .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sweet - I didn't get Nukemodded with an INTENTIONAL flamebait subject line.
It's a good day.Actually I have nothing against Firefox - I just find Opera &amp; Chrome superior.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850710</id>
	<title>Re:How can I upgrade on Ubuntu?</title>
	<author>Chatterton</author>
	<datestamp>1264066560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The simplest way to upgrade in ubuntu is to wait. Wait a long time. One day or another it will appear in your proposed upgrades.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The simplest way to upgrade in ubuntu is to wait .
Wait a long time .
One day or another it will appear in your proposed upgrades .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The simplest way to upgrade in ubuntu is to wait.
Wait a long time.
One day or another it will appear in your proposed upgrades.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850298</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30854854</id>
	<title>Vista</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264082040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just installed - it has crashed twice already, and sucks up a couple 100 MB of memory.  Of course, I am running on Vista.</p><p>Disappointed</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just installed - it has crashed twice already , and sucks up a couple 100 MB of memory .
Of course , I am running on Vista.Disappointed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just installed - it has crashed twice already, and sucks up a couple 100 MB of memory.
Of course, I am running on Vista.Disappointed</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30862686</id>
	<title>Re:Personas, lightweight themes?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264193400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That's why I could never really stand Opera: you can make it look like anything, but good luck making it look like it belongs.</p></div><p>Not sure what you're complaint is with Opera.  At least in Windows, it fully supports the default widget set.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's why I could never really stand Opera : you can make it look like anything , but good luck making it look like it belongs.Not sure what you 're complaint is with Opera .
At least in Windows , it fully supports the default widget set .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's why I could never really stand Opera: you can make it look like anything, but good luck making it look like it belongs.Not sure what you're complaint is with Opera.
At least in Windows, it fully supports the default widget set.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30852166</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304</id>
	<title>GPU accelerated Firefox?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264065060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the goals mentioned in the article was to improve garbage collection performance to make pauses shorter and animations smoother. Why not just use the video card to accelerate the graphical operations (plus any other GPGPU operations)? Flash and PDF readers have already done it. For that matter, Windows Vista or later UIs have already do the same. This will give performance edges over contemporary browsers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the goals mentioned in the article was to improve garbage collection performance to make pauses shorter and animations smoother .
Why not just use the video card to accelerate the graphical operations ( plus any other GPGPU operations ) ?
Flash and PDF readers have already done it .
For that matter , Windows Vista or later UIs have already do the same .
This will give performance edges over contemporary browsers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the goals mentioned in the article was to improve garbage collection performance to make pauses shorter and animations smoother.
Why not just use the video card to accelerate the graphical operations (plus any other GPGPU operations)?
Flash and PDF readers have already done it.
For that matter, Windows Vista or later UIs have already do the same.
This will give performance edges over contemporary browsers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30854866</id>
	<title>Re:Personas, lightweight themes?</title>
	<author>UnknownSoldier</author>
	<datestamp>1264082100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm still miffed that the resizing was nuked on the Add Bookmark dialog and you have to use an extension to get it back. WTF?</p><p>At least the memory leak (not releasing memory when tabs are closed) should be gone...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm still miffed that the resizing was nuked on the Add Bookmark dialog and you have to use an extension to get it back .
WTF ? At least the memory leak ( not releasing memory when tabs are closed ) should be gone.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm still miffed that the resizing was nuked on the Add Bookmark dialog and you have to use an extension to get it back.
WTF?At least the memory leak (not releasing memory when tabs are closed) should be gone...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856732</id>
	<title>Re:Personas, lightweight themes?</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1264100160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But but but but<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... what  would we ever do with out 14,000 'theme's that consist of nothing more than some woman in a swim suit for all of our borders and boobies for buttons?</p><p>Heres a hint:  If you add 'skinning' or 'themeing' to your app, you don't know how to make a GUI that doesn't suck ass.  Stop there, go do something else and find someone who has a clue about how to make a GUI or someone who at least understands consistency across applications is important.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But but but but ... what would we ever do with out 14,000 'theme 's that consist of nothing more than some woman in a swim suit for all of our borders and boobies for buttons ? Heres a hint : If you add 'skinning ' or 'themeing ' to your app , you do n't know how to make a GUI that does n't suck ass .
Stop there , go do something else and find someone who has a clue about how to make a GUI or someone who at least understands consistency across applications is important .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But but but but ... what  would we ever do with out 14,000 'theme's that consist of nothing more than some woman in a swim suit for all of our borders and boobies for buttons?Heres a hint:  If you add 'skinning' or 'themeing' to your app, you don't know how to make a GUI that doesn't suck ass.
Stop there, go do something else and find someone who has a clue about how to make a GUI or someone who at least understands consistency across applications is important.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30901796</id>
	<title>Re:Open Link in New Tab changed</title>
	<author>earl\_sven</author>
	<datestamp>1264502940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hadn't noticed that, but the new behaviour is definitely the way it ought to be IMHO, the number of times that I opened a link in a new tab and the tab bar zoomed frantically to the end so I had to scroll back to find my place in my open tabs was infuriating!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Had n't noticed that , but the new behaviour is definitely the way it ought to be IMHO , the number of times that I opened a link in a new tab and the tab bar zoomed frantically to the end so I had to scroll back to find my place in my open tabs was infuriating !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hadn't noticed that, but the new behaviour is definitely the way it ought to be IMHO, the number of times that I opened a link in a new tab and the tab bar zoomed frantically to the end so I had to scroll back to find my place in my open tabs was infuriating!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30854586</id>
	<title>Javascript performance</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1264080600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I used someones firefox with these persona things already installed...it was awful, I couldn't see which tab was what.

It was like giving myspace page designers control over your browser</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I used someones firefox with these persona things already installed...it was awful , I could n't see which tab was what .
It was like giving myspace page designers control over your browser</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used someones firefox with these persona things already installed...it was awful, I couldn't see which tab was what.
It was like giving myspace page designers control over your browser
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850734</id>
	<title>Re:How about fixing the Memory leaks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264066680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>get the Ghostery plugin for firefox.  That stops some poorly written javascript from running in the first place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>get the Ghostery plugin for firefox .
That stops some poorly written javascript from running in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>get the Ghostery plugin for firefox.
That stops some poorly written javascript from running in the first place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244</id>
	<title>Personas, lightweight themes?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264064880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Proof that Firefox is heading for doom. Stop wasting time on making the browser look different than the fucking OS you idiots.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Proof that Firefox is heading for doom .
Stop wasting time on making the browser look different than the fucking OS you idiots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Proof that Firefox is heading for doom.
Stop wasting time on making the browser look different than the fucking OS you idiots.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851494</id>
	<title>how about making FF fun again</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264068900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The GUI that pops up when you want to bookmark something - case study in bad design<br>How about a real editor for bookmarks, with some minimal feature like export this folder (when you need to send someone a bunch of stuff)<br>How about mozilla not being a jerk about extensions, and getting rid of the spam that makes it hard to see anything but the top 5 extensions big brother mozilla thinks you should have</p><p>How about a stable platform for extension developers</p><p>How about letting the world know how awesome FF+noscript+adblock is when you go to a site like YAHOO<br>I hadn't been to YAHOO wihtout my little protectors, noscript/adblock/flashblock for some time and was astonished at how much ads have taken over the front page - how can people stand it</p><p>how about giving the users some control over privacy, so we have the wipe things clean on exit menu again</p><p>how about giving some users an idea of how much info the SOBs of the web, like google, are collecting</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The GUI that pops up when you want to bookmark something - case study in bad designHow about a real editor for bookmarks , with some minimal feature like export this folder ( when you need to send someone a bunch of stuff ) How about mozilla not being a jerk about extensions , and getting rid of the spam that makes it hard to see anything but the top 5 extensions big brother mozilla thinks you should haveHow about a stable platform for extension developersHow about letting the world know how awesome FF + noscript + adblock is when you go to a site like YAHOOI had n't been to YAHOO wihtout my little protectors , noscript/adblock/flashblock for some time and was astonished at how much ads have taken over the front page - how can people stand ithow about giving the users some control over privacy , so we have the wipe things clean on exit menu againhow about giving some users an idea of how much info the SOBs of the web , like google , are collecting</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The GUI that pops up when you want to bookmark something - case study in bad designHow about a real editor for bookmarks, with some minimal feature like export this folder (when you need to send someone a bunch of stuff)How about mozilla not being a jerk about extensions, and getting rid of the spam that makes it hard to see anything but the top 5 extensions big brother mozilla thinks you should haveHow about a stable platform for extension developersHow about letting the world know how awesome FF+noscript+adblock is when you go to a site like YAHOOI hadn't been to YAHOO wihtout my little protectors, noscript/adblock/flashblock for some time and was astonished at how much ads have taken over the front page - how can people stand ithow about giving the users some control over privacy, so we have the wipe things clean on exit menu againhow about giving some users an idea of how much info the SOBs of the web, like google, are collecting</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30852248</id>
	<title>Does it fix the color management problem in 3.5?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264071180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does Firefox 3.6 implement better handling of icc v4 color profiles than 3.5 or will I still need to run FF3.0 to keep images from looking like crap on a calibrated screen with a profile?</p><p>Firefox 3.0 handled them well, but they completely broke them when they replaced the color management system in 3.5.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does Firefox 3.6 implement better handling of icc v4 color profiles than 3.5 or will I still need to run FF3.0 to keep images from looking like crap on a calibrated screen with a profile ? Firefox 3.0 handled them well , but they completely broke them when they replaced the color management system in 3.5 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does Firefox 3.6 implement better handling of icc v4 color profiles than 3.5 or will I still need to run FF3.0 to keep images from looking like crap on a calibrated screen with a profile?Firefox 3.0 handled them well, but they completely broke them when they replaced the color management system in 3.5.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850538</id>
	<title>Re:Javascript performance</title>
	<author>Rockoon</author>
	<datestamp>1264065900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Want to throw Opera in there?<br>
<br>
For the tests linked to <a href="http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel\_tests/" title="nontroppo.org">here</a> [nontroppo.org] the latest official release is slightly slower than Chrome, but the latest alpha build is significantly faster than chrome.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Want to throw Opera in there ?
For the tests linked to here [ nontroppo.org ] the latest official release is slightly slower than Chrome , but the latest alpha build is significantly faster than chrome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Want to throw Opera in there?
For the tests linked to here [nontroppo.org] the latest official release is slightly slower than Chrome, but the latest alpha build is significantly faster than chrome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850292</id>
	<title>How about fixing the Memory leaks?</title>
	<author>imnotreallynewhere</author>
	<datestamp>1264065060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Having to restart every few hours as the memory footprint creeps up to 1GB in size....I would gladly take improvements in memory leaks over speed increases in javascript rendering.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having to restart every few hours as the memory footprint creeps up to 1GB in size....I would gladly take improvements in memory leaks over speed increases in javascript rendering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having to restart every few hours as the memory footprint creeps up to 1GB in size....I would gladly take improvements in memory leaks over speed increases in javascript rendering.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850654</id>
	<title>Re:GPU accelerated Firefox?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264066380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe I read somewhere that they're working on an openGL version of the graphics engine.  and if I remember correctly It's slated for the next large release 3.7.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe I read somewhere that they 're working on an openGL version of the graphics engine .
and if I remember correctly It 's slated for the next large release 3.7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe I read somewhere that they're working on an openGL version of the graphics engine.
and if I remember correctly It's slated for the next large release 3.7.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855816</id>
	<title>Re:Speed Kills (play it safe - buy a Chevy)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264090020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about you let us know when Opera and Chrome catch up to Midori?  In my experience, Midori beats them all, for speed.  YMMV, and I haven't even looked for benchmarks - I'm just going by personal experience.  Oh yeah - Midori has been passing the Acid tests for quite a long time.  It was the first, as far as I know.<br>
&nbsp; <a href="http://s217.photobucket.com/albums/cc226/Runaway1956/?action=view&amp;current=Midori\_Acid3.png" title="photobucket.com">http://s217.photobucket.com/albums/cc226/Runaway1956/?action=view&amp;current=Midori\_Acid3.png</a> [photobucket.com]</p><p>And, my primary browser is still Firefox.  Customizations are worth the loss in speed, IMHO</p><p>My biggest complaint with Firefox is that it freezes occasionally.  Just kinda fades out, and hangs for awhile.  After several seconds, it brightens back up, and away I go.  But, speed?  My ISP limits my speed more than my browser does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about you let us know when Opera and Chrome catch up to Midori ?
In my experience , Midori beats them all , for speed .
YMMV , and I have n't even looked for benchmarks - I 'm just going by personal experience .
Oh yeah - Midori has been passing the Acid tests for quite a long time .
It was the first , as far as I know .
  http : //s217.photobucket.com/albums/cc226/Runaway1956/ ? action = view&amp;current = Midori \ _Acid3.png [ photobucket.com ] And , my primary browser is still Firefox .
Customizations are worth the loss in speed , IMHOMy biggest complaint with Firefox is that it freezes occasionally .
Just kinda fades out , and hangs for awhile .
After several seconds , it brightens back up , and away I go .
But , speed ?
My ISP limits my speed more than my browser does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about you let us know when Opera and Chrome catch up to Midori?
In my experience, Midori beats them all, for speed.
YMMV, and I haven't even looked for benchmarks - I'm just going by personal experience.
Oh yeah - Midori has been passing the Acid tests for quite a long time.
It was the first, as far as I know.
  http://s217.photobucket.com/albums/cc226/Runaway1956/?action=view&amp;current=Midori\_Acid3.png [photobucket.com]And, my primary browser is still Firefox.
Customizations are worth the loss in speed, IMHOMy biggest complaint with Firefox is that it freezes occasionally.
Just kinda fades out, and hangs for awhile.
After several seconds, it brightens back up, and away I go.
But, speed?
My ISP limits my speed more than my browser does.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850572</id>
	<title>Re:Javascript performance</title>
	<author>causality</author>
	<datestamp>1264066080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My javascript performance comparison between Firefox 3.6 and Chrome and Safari <a href="http://www.manu-j.com/blog/firefox-3-6-vs-chrome-vs-safari-javascript-performance/432/" title="manu-j.com">http://www.manu-j.com/blog/firefox-3-6-vs-chrome-vs-safari-javascript-performance/432/</a> [manu-j.com] </p><blockquote><div><p>As usual, Firefox performance on the v8 benchmark is pathetic where Chrome is more than 10 times faster.It is 24\% faster than version 3.5.4 in V8 but it is clearly not enough. In the sunspider test, chrome is 2 times as fast as firefox. In this test, 3.6 is 17\% faster than 3.5.4. Safari too comfortably beats Firefox in both these benchmarks</p></div></blockquote></div><p>They should use Slashdot for testing JS performance.  Click "Read More" to load a new discussion, then hit "Reply to This", type a response, hit "Preview", and count how many seconds it takes before you see the preview.  May the best browser win!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My javascript performance comparison between Firefox 3.6 and Chrome and Safari http : //www.manu-j.com/blog/firefox-3-6-vs-chrome-vs-safari-javascript-performance/432/ [ manu-j.com ] As usual , Firefox performance on the v8 benchmark is pathetic where Chrome is more than 10 times faster.It is 24 \ % faster than version 3.5.4 in V8 but it is clearly not enough .
In the sunspider test , chrome is 2 times as fast as firefox .
In this test , 3.6 is 17 \ % faster than 3.5.4 .
Safari too comfortably beats Firefox in both these benchmarksThey should use Slashdot for testing JS performance .
Click " Read More " to load a new discussion , then hit " Reply to This " , type a response , hit " Preview " , and count how many seconds it takes before you see the preview .
May the best browser win !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My javascript performance comparison between Firefox 3.6 and Chrome and Safari http://www.manu-j.com/blog/firefox-3-6-vs-chrome-vs-safari-javascript-performance/432/ [manu-j.com] As usual, Firefox performance on the v8 benchmark is pathetic where Chrome is more than 10 times faster.It is 24\% faster than version 3.5.4 in V8 but it is clearly not enough.
In the sunspider test, chrome is 2 times as fast as firefox.
In this test, 3.6 is 17\% faster than 3.5.4.
Safari too comfortably beats Firefox in both these benchmarksThey should use Slashdot for testing JS performance.
Click "Read More" to load a new discussion, then hit "Reply to This", type a response, hit "Preview", and count how many seconds it takes before you see the preview.
May the best browser win!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851394</id>
	<title>Mozilla Firefox, Portable Edition 3.6 for USB, too</title>
	<author>CritterNYC</author>
	<datestamp>1264068600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The portable version of Firefox 3.6 from PortableApps.com was just released in 15 languages, too:</p><p><a href="http://portableapps.com/news/2010-01-21\_-\_firefox\_portable\_3.6" title="portableapps.com">http://portableapps.com/news/2010-01-21\_-\_firefox\_portable\_3.6</a> [portableapps.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The portable version of Firefox 3.6 from PortableApps.com was just released in 15 languages , too : http : //portableapps.com/news/2010-01-21 \ _- \ _firefox \ _portable \ _3.6 [ portableapps.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The portable version of Firefox 3.6 from PortableApps.com was just released in 15 languages, too:http://portableapps.com/news/2010-01-21\_-\_firefox\_portable\_3.6 [portableapps.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850228</id>
	<title>YAWN...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264064820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did I miss something? No? Good.  zzzzz</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did I miss something ?
No ? Good .
zzzzz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did I miss something?
No? Good.
zzzzz</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30858908</id>
	<title>Re:how about making FF fun again</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264173120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How about letting the world know how awesome FF+noscript+adblock is when you go to a site like YAHOO"</p><p>Why would Mozilla actively promote a third part extension? Why would Mozilla actively promote a third party extension that blocks advertisement and hence revenue streams?</p><p>"how about giving the users some control over privacy, so we have the wipe things clean on exit menu again"</p><p>How about using the private browsing session feature? http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Private+Browsing</p><p>"how about giving some users an idea of how much info the SOBs of the web, like google, are collecting"</p><p>Opera should do that as well then. And Microsoft. And who's that big company who's browser people are talking about... oh yeah, Google.</p><p>I can't imagine who modded this barely coherent rant to +5 Interesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How about letting the world know how awesome FF + noscript + adblock is when you go to a site like YAHOO " Why would Mozilla actively promote a third part extension ?
Why would Mozilla actively promote a third party extension that blocks advertisement and hence revenue streams ?
" how about giving the users some control over privacy , so we have the wipe things clean on exit menu again " How about using the private browsing session feature ?
http : //support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Private + Browsing " how about giving some users an idea of how much info the SOBs of the web , like google , are collecting " Opera should do that as well then .
And Microsoft .
And who 's that big company who 's browser people are talking about... oh yeah , Google.I ca n't imagine who modded this barely coherent rant to + 5 Interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How about letting the world know how awesome FF+noscript+adblock is when you go to a site like YAHOO"Why would Mozilla actively promote a third part extension?
Why would Mozilla actively promote a third party extension that blocks advertisement and hence revenue streams?
"how about giving the users some control over privacy, so we have the wipe things clean on exit menu again"How about using the private browsing session feature?
http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Private+Browsing"how about giving some users an idea of how much info the SOBs of the web, like google, are collecting"Opera should do that as well then.
And Microsoft.
And who's that big company who's browser people are talking about... oh yeah, Google.I can't imagine who modded this barely coherent rant to +5 Interesting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766</id>
	<title>Open Link in New Tab changed</title>
	<author>bughunter</author>
	<datestamp>1264066740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The new tab now appears to the right of the current tab when you right click on a link and select "Open Link in New Tab."</p><p>I just discovered that after about 5 seconds of "Hey, where'd my new tab go??"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The new tab now appears to the right of the current tab when you right click on a link and select " Open Link in New Tab .
" I just discovered that after about 5 seconds of " Hey , where 'd my new tab go ? ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The new tab now appears to the right of the current tab when you right click on a link and select "Open Link in New Tab.
"I just discovered that after about 5 seconds of "Hey, where'd my new tab go??
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30857440</id>
	<title>What other extensions aren't ready yet?</title>
	<author>billstewart</author>
	<datestamp>1264153740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The ones that really matter are AdBlock and NoScript - if they're not ready I'm not switching. </p><p>I also use a few others, like Ghostery, and I'm assuming the restore-most-recently-deleted-tab button will still work, but it's the basic safety ones that matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The ones that really matter are AdBlock and NoScript - if they 're not ready I 'm not switching .
I also use a few others , like Ghostery , and I 'm assuming the restore-most-recently-deleted-tab button will still work , but it 's the basic safety ones that matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ones that really matter are AdBlock and NoScript - if they're not ready I'm not switching.
I also use a few others, like Ghostery, and I'm assuming the restore-most-recently-deleted-tab button will still work, but it's the basic safety ones that matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850326</id>
	<title>Re:Speed Kills (play it safe - buy a Chevy)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264065120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FLOSS is for communist Obama nigger fags.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FLOSS is for communist Obama nigger fags .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FLOSS is for communist Obama nigger fags.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850704</id>
	<title>Re:Javascript performance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264066560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem is there are just not the plugins for other browsers.  Even though some folks are obsessing over rendering times, the extensions add to block flash, malware, adblock, etc make Firefox faster and the web more usable for me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is there are just not the plugins for other browsers .
Even though some folks are obsessing over rendering times , the extensions add to block flash , malware , adblock , etc make Firefox faster and the web more usable for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is there are just not the plugins for other browsers.
Even though some folks are obsessing over rendering times, the extensions add to block flash, malware, adblock, etc make Firefox faster and the web more usable for me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855980</id>
	<title>Re:Speed Kills (play it safe - buy a Chevy)</title>
	<author>TangoMargarine</author>
	<datestamp>1264091460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only 32 minutes seems a bit premature...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only 32 minutes seems a bit premature.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only 32 minutes seems a bit premature...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850046</id>
	<title>Switch Proxy Tool</title>
	<author>wbav</author>
	<datestamp>1264107240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you have the Switch Proxy Tool, I strongly suggest you disable it.  Caused all sort of issues when upgrading.

If you've already upgraded, right click on the shortcut and run in safe mode, there you can disable it.

YMMV.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have the Switch Proxy Tool , I strongly suggest you disable it .
Caused all sort of issues when upgrading .
If you 've already upgraded , right click on the shortcut and run in safe mode , there you can disable it .
YMMV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have the Switch Proxy Tool, I strongly suggest you disable it.
Caused all sort of issues when upgrading.
If you've already upgraded, right click on the shortcut and run in safe mode, there you can disable it.
YMMV.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30865964</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty neat.</title>
	<author>dveditz</author>
	<datestamp>1264170060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Much better to use the Add-on Compatibility Reporter <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/15003" title="mozilla.org">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/15003</a> [mozilla.org]</p><p>It will enable all your officially incompatible addons just like the pref, and you can help by reporting your add-ons as working fine or not compatible (reporting is completely optional).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Much better to use the Add-on Compatibility Reporter https : //addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/15003 [ mozilla.org ] It will enable all your officially incompatible addons just like the pref , and you can help by reporting your add-ons as working fine or not compatible ( reporting is completely optional ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Much better to use the Add-on Compatibility Reporter https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/15003 [mozilla.org]It will enable all your officially incompatible addons just like the pref, and you can help by reporting your add-ons as working fine or not compatible (reporting is completely optional).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850652</id>
	<title>Re:GPU accelerated Firefox?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264066380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One of the goals mentioned in the article was to improve garbage collection performance to make pauses shorter and animations smoother. Why not just use the video card to accelerate the graphical operations (plus any other GPGPU operations)?</p></div><p>Because then animations would still pause and skip when they garbage collect. To use a car analogy. If you have a flat tire, putting on a new car DVD player won't make your car run better.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the goals mentioned in the article was to improve garbage collection performance to make pauses shorter and animations smoother .
Why not just use the video card to accelerate the graphical operations ( plus any other GPGPU operations ) ? Because then animations would still pause and skip when they garbage collect .
To use a car analogy .
If you have a flat tire , putting on a new car DVD player wo n't make your car run better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the goals mentioned in the article was to improve garbage collection performance to make pauses shorter and animations smoother.
Why not just use the video card to accelerate the graphical operations (plus any other GPGPU operations)?Because then animations would still pause and skip when they garbage collect.
To use a car analogy.
If you have a flat tire, putting on a new car DVD player won't make your car run better.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856762</id>
	<title>Re:Where can I download this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264100640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe you should not install it then?  Its not your computer, its theres, perhaps you should not go out of your way to break the rules?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you should not install it then ?
Its not your computer , its theres , perhaps you should not go out of your way to break the rules ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you should not install it then?
Its not your computer, its theres, perhaps you should not go out of your way to break the rules?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850298</id>
	<title>How can I upgrade on Ubuntu?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264065060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Posting AC so I don't get called a noob.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Posting AC so I do n't get called a noob .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Posting AC so I don't get called a noob.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850728</id>
	<title>sudo apt-get install firefox-3.6</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1264066680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let me Google that for you: <a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=install+firefox+3.6+in+ubuntu+karmic" title="lmgtfy.com">install firefox 3.6 in ubuntu karmic</a> [lmgtfy.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me Google that for you : install firefox 3.6 in ubuntu karmic [ lmgtfy.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me Google that for you: install firefox 3.6 in ubuntu karmic [lmgtfy.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850298</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850824</id>
	<title>Personas are not themes, but want to replace them</title>
	<author>BenoitRen</author>
	<datestamp>1264066860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Personas are not light-weight themes. In fact, they're not themes at all. They're more like little gadgets that you hook up to your web browser to customise one part of its UI. It doesn't even compare to a theme.</p><p>But what's worse is that Mozilla is looking to depreciate themes in favour of Personas. From the Add-ons Manager, click "Get Themes". You won't see a page listing themes, but a page listing Personas. There isn't even a link there to the actual themes listing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Personas are not light-weight themes .
In fact , they 're not themes at all .
They 're more like little gadgets that you hook up to your web browser to customise one part of its UI .
It does n't even compare to a theme.But what 's worse is that Mozilla is looking to depreciate themes in favour of Personas .
From the Add-ons Manager , click " Get Themes " .
You wo n't see a page listing themes , but a page listing Personas .
There is n't even a link there to the actual themes listing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personas are not light-weight themes.
In fact, they're not themes at all.
They're more like little gadgets that you hook up to your web browser to customise one part of its UI.
It doesn't even compare to a theme.But what's worse is that Mozilla is looking to depreciate themes in favour of Personas.
From the Add-ons Manager, click "Get Themes".
You won't see a page listing themes, but a page listing Personas.
There isn't even a link there to the actual themes listing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30858356</id>
	<title>Re:GPU accelerated Firefox?</title>
	<author>(pvb)charon</author>
	<datestamp>1264167060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're working on it: <a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Gecko:Layers" title="mozilla.org" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.mozilla.org/Gecko:Layers</a> [mozilla.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're working on it : https : //wiki.mozilla.org/Gecko : Layers [ mozilla.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're working on it: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Gecko:Layers [mozilla.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851538</id>
	<title>Re:Open Link in New Tab changed</title>
	<author>Paradigm\_Complex</author>
	<datestamp>1264069020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I prefered Firefox's older way of dealing with this.  To revert, go to about:config and change<blockquote><div><p> <tt>browser.tabs.insertRelatedAfterCurrent true</tt></p></div> </blockquote><p>to</p><blockquote><div><p> <tt>browser.tabs.insertRelatedAfterCurrent false</tt></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefered Firefox 's older way of dealing with this .
To revert , go to about : config and change browser.tabs.insertRelatedAfterCurrent true to browser.tabs.insertRelatedAfterCurrent false</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefered Firefox's older way of dealing with this.
To revert, go to about:config and change browser.tabs.insertRelatedAfterCurrent true to browser.tabs.insertRelatedAfterCurrent false 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30858356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30865660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30853832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30868586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30860346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30868572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30853734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30853840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30858266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30854866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30857440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30901796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30864436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30854130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30862202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851910
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30852008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30852786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30858908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30901330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30852166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30862686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30865964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30852892
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1918204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30854690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851972
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30852786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30858356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30852892
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851432
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30868586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856770
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30864436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30901796
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850560
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30852008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850294
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850326
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856718
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30858266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851454
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30865964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850440
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30853832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850576
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30858908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856242
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30860346
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850734
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850624
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30853076
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850908
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30854130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30901330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30851144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30857440
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850578
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850594
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30853840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30865660
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30853932
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1918204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30850244
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30868572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30852166
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30862686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30862202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30856442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30854690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30855808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30854866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1918204.30853734
</commentlist>
</conversation>
