<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_21_179242</id>
	<title>Facebook Master Password Was "Chuck Norris"</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1264103760000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.eff.org/support" rel="nofollow">I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property</a> writes <i>"A Facebook employee has given a tell-all interview with some very <a href="http://therumpus.net/2010/01/conversations-about-the-internet-5-anonymous-facebook-employee/?full=yes">interesting things about Facebook's internals</a>.  Especially interesting are all the things relating to <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/12/facebooks-new-privacy-changes-good-bad-and-ugly">Facebook privacy</a>.  Basically, you don't have any.  Nearly everything you've ever done on the site is recorded into a database.  While they fire employees for snooping, more than a few have done it.  There's an internal system to let them log into anyone's profile, though they have to be able to defend their reason for doing so.  And they used to have a master password that could log into any Facebook profile:  'Chuck Norris.'  <a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/01/privacy\_violati.html">Bruce Schneier might be jealous</a>  of that one."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>I Do n't Believe in Imaginary Property writes " A Facebook employee has given a tell-all interview with some very interesting things about Facebook 's internals .
Especially interesting are all the things relating to Facebook privacy .
Basically , you do n't have any .
Nearly everything you 've ever done on the site is recorded into a database .
While they fire employees for snooping , more than a few have done it .
There 's an internal system to let them log into anyone 's profile , though they have to be able to defend their reason for doing so .
And they used to have a master password that could log into any Facebook profile : 'Chuck Norris .
' Bruce Schneier might be jealous of that one .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "A Facebook employee has given a tell-all interview with some very interesting things about Facebook's internals.
Especially interesting are all the things relating to Facebook privacy.
Basically, you don't have any.
Nearly everything you've ever done on the site is recorded into a database.
While they fire employees for snooping, more than a few have done it.
There's an internal system to let them log into anyone's profile, though they have to be able to defend their reason for doing so.
And they used to have a master password that could log into any Facebook profile:  'Chuck Norris.
'  Bruce Schneier might be jealous  of that one.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30858692</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>thommym</author>
	<datestamp>1264171500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In Soviet Russia, passwords ask for Chuck Norris.</p></div><p>Shouldn't that be in imperfect tense, asked?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia , passwords ask for Chuck Norris.Should n't that be in imperfect tense , asked ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia, passwords ask for Chuck Norris.Shouldn't that be in imperfect tense, asked?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854676</id>
	<title>Re:SHOCKER</title>
	<author>grim visage</author>
	<datestamp>1264080960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it's the page view tracking that's troubling. Imagine if these logs were leaked. Can't say I like the idea of people knowing every photo I'd ever browsed through.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's the page view tracking that 's troubling .
Imagine if these logs were leaked .
Ca n't say I like the idea of people knowing every photo I 'd ever browsed through .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's the page view tracking that's troubling.
Imagine if these logs were leaked.
Can't say I like the idea of people knowing every photo I'd ever browsed through.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850500</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>mea37</author>
	<datestamp>1264065780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, that's why you should probably not rely on the summary to be accurate.</p><ol> <li>The password was not 'Chuck Norris'.  It was a combination of letters, numbers, and symbols that, were you to see them typed out, would "look like" it said Chuck Norris.  Like maybe they replaced the o with a zero, or a *, or something else.  Maybe the N was an N, an n, a series of symbols like<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/\/... no idea.<p>In other words, they used a lengthy password (presumably at least 11 characters) with a mix of alphanumerics and symbols and a simple mnemonic that would allow anyone who had seen the password to remember it.  That sounds pretty damned good to me.</p></li><li>This is a deprecated access mechanism.  As the service grew up to be a "site with hundreds of millions of users", they got rid of it.  I don't mean they chagned the password; they threw out the ability to use such a password entirely, having replaced it with an audited feature of the app when viewed on their internal network.</li><li>Even when this password worked, you had to be on their network to use it.  It filled an administrative and technical need.  The only problem I see with this approach, especially when the site was small and didn't know how big it would be, was that they apparently didn't have much control to prevent an employee from stumbing on the password.</li></ol><p>I have a dim view of the "privacy" of information on FaceBook, but this story isn't even a blip on that radar.  If you don't already know that information you post to a social networking site is available to the company that runs that site, you need to wake up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , that 's why you should probably not rely on the summary to be accurate .
The password was not 'Chuck Norris' .
It was a combination of letters , numbers , and symbols that , were you to see them typed out , would " look like " it said Chuck Norris .
Like maybe they replaced the o with a zero , or a * , or something else .
Maybe the N was an N , an n , a series of symbols like / \ /... no idea.In other words , they used a lengthy password ( presumably at least 11 characters ) with a mix of alphanumerics and symbols and a simple mnemonic that would allow anyone who had seen the password to remember it .
That sounds pretty damned good to me.This is a deprecated access mechanism .
As the service grew up to be a " site with hundreds of millions of users " , they got rid of it .
I do n't mean they chagned the password ; they threw out the ability to use such a password entirely , having replaced it with an audited feature of the app when viewed on their internal network.Even when this password worked , you had to be on their network to use it .
It filled an administrative and technical need .
The only problem I see with this approach , especially when the site was small and did n't know how big it would be , was that they apparently did n't have much control to prevent an employee from stumbing on the password.I have a dim view of the " privacy " of information on FaceBook , but this story is n't even a blip on that radar .
If you do n't already know that information you post to a social networking site is available to the company that runs that site , you need to wake up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, that's why you should probably not rely on the summary to be accurate.
The password was not 'Chuck Norris'.
It was a combination of letters, numbers, and symbols that, were you to see them typed out, would "look like" it said Chuck Norris.
Like maybe they replaced the o with a zero, or a *, or something else.
Maybe the N was an N, an n, a series of symbols like /\/... no idea.In other words, they used a lengthy password (presumably at least 11 characters) with a mix of alphanumerics and symbols and a simple mnemonic that would allow anyone who had seen the password to remember it.
That sounds pretty damned good to me.This is a deprecated access mechanism.
As the service grew up to be a "site with hundreds of millions of users", they got rid of it.
I don't mean they chagned the password; they threw out the ability to use such a password entirely, having replaced it with an audited feature of the app when viewed on their internal network.Even when this password worked, you had to be on their network to use it.
It filled an administrative and technical need.
The only problem I see with this approach, especially when the site was small and didn't know how big it would be, was that they apparently didn't have much control to prevent an employee from stumbing on the password.I have a dim view of the "privacy" of information on FaceBook, but this story isn't even a blip on that radar.
If you don't already know that information you post to a social networking site is available to the company that runs that site, you need to wake up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850178</id>
	<title>Chuck Norris Jokes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264064580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Alright lets hear the chuck Norris Jokes! I wanna see some good ones</htmltext>
<tokenext>Alright lets hear the chuck Norris Jokes !
I wan na see some good ones</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alright lets hear the chuck Norris Jokes!
I wanna see some good ones</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850140</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264064460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chuck Norris types in his name as the Username and a program never has the chance to ask for a Password.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chuck Norris types in his name as the Username and a program never has the chance to ask for a Password .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chuck Norris types in his name as the Username and a program never has the chance to ask for a Password.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856104</id>
	<title>Re:The very idea of a "master password" seems scar</title>
	<author>joebagodonuts</author>
	<datestamp>1264092840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bruce Campbell</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bruce Campbell</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bruce Campbell</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850464</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Gudeldar</author>
	<datestamp>1264065600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is a false dichotomy. It is both very irresponsible <b>and</b> funny.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is a false dichotomy .
It is both very irresponsible and funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is a false dichotomy.
It is both very irresponsible and funny.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856162</id>
	<title>Re:TFA accuracy?</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1264093380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>Rumpus: When you say &ldquo;click on somebody&rsquo;s profile,&rdquo; you mean you save our viewing history?<br>Employee: That&rsquo;s right. How do you think we know who your best friends are? But that&rsquo;s public knowledge; we&rsquo;ve explicitly stated that we record that. If you look in your type-ahead search, and you press &ldquo;A,&rdquo; or just one letter, a list of your best friends shows up. It&rsquo;s no longer organized alphabetically, but by the person you interact with most, your &ldquo;best friends,&rdquo; or at least those whom we have concluded you are best friends with.</i></p><p>This is rubbish, isn't it?</p><p>I've just typed "a" into the search box and it comes up with an alphabetical list of contacts.  The first one happens to be someone whos profile I don't think I've ever clicked on.</p></div><p>I think it is, none of the people who responded to your post said anything that worked for me. I'm posting this redundant comment because I suspect a few dozen other people read your comment, tried the replies and didn't get anywhere trying to find this feature either.</p><p>And I've been waiting for this feature forever! When I want to find someone I have to scroll through three pages of people I haven't seen for years but don't want to delete because I might want to reconnect for some reason. I am so disappointed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rumpus : When you say    click on somebody    s profile ,    you mean you save our viewing history ? Employee : That    s right .
How do you think we know who your best friends are ?
But that    s public knowledge ; we    ve explicitly stated that we record that .
If you look in your type-ahead search , and you press    A ,    or just one letter , a list of your best friends shows up .
It    s no longer organized alphabetically , but by the person you interact with most , your    best friends ,    or at least those whom we have concluded you are best friends with.This is rubbish , is n't it ? I 've just typed " a " into the search box and it comes up with an alphabetical list of contacts .
The first one happens to be someone whos profile I do n't think I 've ever clicked on.I think it is , none of the people who responded to your post said anything that worked for me .
I 'm posting this redundant comment because I suspect a few dozen other people read your comment , tried the replies and did n't get anywhere trying to find this feature either.And I 've been waiting for this feature forever !
When I want to find someone I have to scroll through three pages of people I have n't seen for years but do n't want to delete because I might want to reconnect for some reason .
I am so disappointed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Rumpus: When you say “click on somebody’s profile,” you mean you save our viewing history?Employee: That’s right.
How do you think we know who your best friends are?
But that’s public knowledge; we’ve explicitly stated that we record that.
If you look in your type-ahead search, and you press “A,” or just one letter, a list of your best friends shows up.
It’s no longer organized alphabetically, but by the person you interact with most, your “best friends,” or at least those whom we have concluded you are best friends with.This is rubbish, isn't it?I've just typed "a" into the search box and it comes up with an alphabetical list of contacts.
The first one happens to be someone whos profile I don't think I've ever clicked on.I think it is, none of the people who responded to your post said anything that worked for me.
I'm posting this redundant comment because I suspect a few dozen other people read your comment, tried the replies and didn't get anywhere trying to find this feature either.And I've been waiting for this feature forever!
When I want to find someone I have to scroll through three pages of people I haven't seen for years but don't want to delete because I might want to reconnect for some reason.
I am so disappointed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852384</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>nilbog</author>
	<datestamp>1264071540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's also worth noting that Facebook didn't have hundreds of millions of users when this was going down.  They had MAYBE thousands.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's also worth noting that Facebook did n't have hundreds of millions of users when this was going down .
They had MAYBE thousands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's also worth noting that Facebook didn't have hundreds of millions of users when this was going down.
They had MAYBE thousands.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851312</id>
	<title>Re:The very idea of a "master password" seems scar</title>
	<author>Zarf</author>
	<datestamp>1264068360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>I wonder, what it is now... "Angelina Jolie"? "Bruce Willis"?</p></div><p>Obama</p></div><p>No, they had to <i>change</i> it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder , what it is now... " Angelina Jolie " ?
" Bruce Willis " ? ObamaNo , they had to change it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder, what it is now... "Angelina Jolie"?
"Bruce Willis"?ObamaNo, they had to change it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30858580</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264170360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The password needs him.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The password needs him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The password needs him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855814</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264090020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anonymous Coward likes it.</p><p>[comment] [like] [delete].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anonymous Coward likes it .
[ comment ] [ like ] [ delete ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anonymous Coward likes it.
[comment] [like] [delete].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850130</id>
	<title>Unhackable</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264064400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chuck Norris is unhackable thats the perfect password.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chuck Norris is unhackable thats the perfect password .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chuck Norris is unhackable thats the perfect password.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850348</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264065180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing is Facebook, in essence, started out as a couple of college dropouts running their first social network... pretty much the same thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is Facebook , in essence , started out as a couple of college dropouts running their first social network... pretty much the same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is Facebook, in essence, started out as a couple of college dropouts running their first social network... pretty much the same thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850626</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Moridineas</author>
	<datestamp>1264066320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RTFM...it's a good bit more complicated. Along with being deprecated sometime before now, the password was not just "Chuck Norris" but bore some resemblance to Chuck Norris including non-alphanumeric, numbers, different cases, etc. Maybe Chuck Norris wasn't a great source word, but I highly doubt from the description in the article there was any danger.</p><p>I feel that overall, it's a pretty good way to come up with passwords. For instance, take your pets name and childhood phone number, replace some letters with symbols, mix them up in a memorable way and chances are you've got a pretty decent password.</p><p>Fido + 424-5566 could be</p><p>424@f1D0#5566</p><p>Maybe not a perfect password by randomness standards etc, but orders of magnitude better than MOST passwords. And, perhaps most importantly, memorable to the person who made it, and can easily be extended in length.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RTFM...it 's a good bit more complicated .
Along with being deprecated sometime before now , the password was not just " Chuck Norris " but bore some resemblance to Chuck Norris including non-alphanumeric , numbers , different cases , etc .
Maybe Chuck Norris was n't a great source word , but I highly doubt from the description in the article there was any danger.I feel that overall , it 's a pretty good way to come up with passwords .
For instance , take your pets name and childhood phone number , replace some letters with symbols , mix them up in a memorable way and chances are you 've got a pretty decent password.Fido + 424-5566 could be424 @ f1D0 # 5566Maybe not a perfect password by randomness standards etc , but orders of magnitude better than MOST passwords .
And , perhaps most importantly , memorable to the person who made it , and can easily be extended in length .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RTFM...it's a good bit more complicated.
Along with being deprecated sometime before now, the password was not just "Chuck Norris" but bore some resemblance to Chuck Norris including non-alphanumeric, numbers, different cases, etc.
Maybe Chuck Norris wasn't a great source word, but I highly doubt from the description in the article there was any danger.I feel that overall, it's a pretty good way to come up with passwords.
For instance, take your pets name and childhood phone number, replace some letters with symbols, mix them up in a memorable way and chances are you've got a pretty decent password.Fido + 424-5566 could be424@f1D0#5566Maybe not a perfect password by randomness standards etc, but orders of magnitude better than MOST passwords.
And, perhaps most importantly, memorable to the person who made it, and can easily be extended in length.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853680</id>
	<title>Oh yeah?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264076100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tom is my friend.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tom is my friend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tom is my friend.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851148</id>
	<title>Re:The very idea of a "master password" seems scar</title>
	<author>RyuuzakiTetsuya</author>
	<datestamp>1264067880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>J03 pisC0p0</p><p>Like anyone's ever going to admit to using *that* as a password.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>J03 pisC0p0Like anyone 's ever going to admit to using * that * as a password .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>J03 pisC0p0Like anyone's ever going to admit to using *that* as a password.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30859590</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Pigeon451</author>
	<datestamp>1264176660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was "like" the name "Chuck Norris" made of of symbols, upper and lower case letters. Even if you knew the password, good luck trying all the combinations to get the actual password.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was " like " the name " Chuck Norris " made of of symbols , upper and lower case letters .
Even if you knew the password , good luck trying all the combinations to get the actual password .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was "like" the name "Chuck Norris" made of of symbols, upper and lower case letters.
Even if you knew the password, good luck trying all the combinations to get the actual password.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856900</id>
	<title>Re:SHOCKER</title>
	<author>YttriumOxide</author>
	<datestamp>1264102380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Facebook is for attention whores who want other people to know details about their lives....<br>I know of 1 person with a facebook profile who isn't an attention whore, and they use it just so they can spy on others.</p></div><p>I have a facebook account, and am most definitely not an "attention whore".  I spend a great deal of my life travelling around the world (for both work and pleasure), and find that facebook is a very good way to keep in loose contact with friends I've made around the world, but am unlikely to speak to regularly.</p><p>Next time I go to the New England area of the US for example, there's 4 or 5 people there who I'll be able to tell in advance that I'm coming and see if they want to meet up for a drink or two.  Much better than knowing no-one there.</p><p>A common response to this is something like: "Why not just use email?".  Simply because I don't want to personally try to maintain a private database of people's email addresses, and also because if I only emailed them once every 2 to 3 years (i.e. when I'm going to come visit), there's a good chance that we wouldn't really remember each other.  By having the "loose contact" that facebook provides, they may not be fresh in my memory, but they're at least on the radar.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Its fucking retarded to talk about privacy when the whole point is giving out your information.</p></div><p>This however, I completely agree with.  There's nothing on my facebook profile that I wouldn't be happy to announce to the world.  Of course, I'm pretty open about myself in general, so my facebook profile does have pictures of me taking LSD, friends smoking pot, drunkenness at parties and so on.  It doesn't bother me who sees these things.  It also has things on there not related to partying or illegal mind expansion.  I figure that anyone who sees it will see that I'm a complete person, not just a one dimensional character.  I have characteristics that some may consider flaws (such as the occasional (but yes, rare) heavy drinking; and the also occasional (but not so rare) LSD use) and attempt to use against me; but I myself don't consider them flaws, so if others do, I think of that as their problem, not mine.  If a potential employer were to find out about these things and then not hire me, then it's probably a company I wouldn't have been happy working for anyway (for reference, I've been drunk with my current boss more than once, and tripped with my last boss once - as long as it doesn't negatively affect my job, neither of them cared (and my last boss accepted that the LSD probably improves my work as long as I'm not actually on it while at work)).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook is for attention whores who want other people to know details about their lives....I know of 1 person with a facebook profile who is n't an attention whore , and they use it just so they can spy on others.I have a facebook account , and am most definitely not an " attention whore " .
I spend a great deal of my life travelling around the world ( for both work and pleasure ) , and find that facebook is a very good way to keep in loose contact with friends I 've made around the world , but am unlikely to speak to regularly.Next time I go to the New England area of the US for example , there 's 4 or 5 people there who I 'll be able to tell in advance that I 'm coming and see if they want to meet up for a drink or two .
Much better than knowing no-one there.A common response to this is something like : " Why not just use email ? " .
Simply because I do n't want to personally try to maintain a private database of people 's email addresses , and also because if I only emailed them once every 2 to 3 years ( i.e .
when I 'm going to come visit ) , there 's a good chance that we would n't really remember each other .
By having the " loose contact " that facebook provides , they may not be fresh in my memory , but they 're at least on the radar.Its fucking retarded to talk about privacy when the whole point is giving out your information.This however , I completely agree with .
There 's nothing on my facebook profile that I would n't be happy to announce to the world .
Of course , I 'm pretty open about myself in general , so my facebook profile does have pictures of me taking LSD , friends smoking pot , drunkenness at parties and so on .
It does n't bother me who sees these things .
It also has things on there not related to partying or illegal mind expansion .
I figure that anyone who sees it will see that I 'm a complete person , not just a one dimensional character .
I have characteristics that some may consider flaws ( such as the occasional ( but yes , rare ) heavy drinking ; and the also occasional ( but not so rare ) LSD use ) and attempt to use against me ; but I myself do n't consider them flaws , so if others do , I think of that as their problem , not mine .
If a potential employer were to find out about these things and then not hire me , then it 's probably a company I would n't have been happy working for anyway ( for reference , I 've been drunk with my current boss more than once , and tripped with my last boss once - as long as it does n't negatively affect my job , neither of them cared ( and my last boss accepted that the LSD probably improves my work as long as I 'm not actually on it while at work ) ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook is for attention whores who want other people to know details about their lives....I know of 1 person with a facebook profile who isn't an attention whore, and they use it just so they can spy on others.I have a facebook account, and am most definitely not an "attention whore".
I spend a great deal of my life travelling around the world (for both work and pleasure), and find that facebook is a very good way to keep in loose contact with friends I've made around the world, but am unlikely to speak to regularly.Next time I go to the New England area of the US for example, there's 4 or 5 people there who I'll be able to tell in advance that I'm coming and see if they want to meet up for a drink or two.
Much better than knowing no-one there.A common response to this is something like: "Why not just use email?".
Simply because I don't want to personally try to maintain a private database of people's email addresses, and also because if I only emailed them once every 2 to 3 years (i.e.
when I'm going to come visit), there's a good chance that we wouldn't really remember each other.
By having the "loose contact" that facebook provides, they may not be fresh in my memory, but they're at least on the radar.Its fucking retarded to talk about privacy when the whole point is giving out your information.This however, I completely agree with.
There's nothing on my facebook profile that I wouldn't be happy to announce to the world.
Of course, I'm pretty open about myself in general, so my facebook profile does have pictures of me taking LSD, friends smoking pot, drunkenness at parties and so on.
It doesn't bother me who sees these things.
It also has things on there not related to partying or illegal mind expansion.
I figure that anyone who sees it will see that I'm a complete person, not just a one dimensional character.
I have characteristics that some may consider flaws (such as the occasional (but yes, rare) heavy drinking; and the also occasional (but not so rare) LSD use) and attempt to use against me; but I myself don't consider them flaws, so if others do, I think of that as their problem, not mine.
If a potential employer were to find out about these things and then not hire me, then it's probably a company I wouldn't have been happy working for anyway (for reference, I've been drunk with my current boss more than once, and tripped with my last boss once - as long as it doesn't negatively affect my job, neither of them cared (and my last boss accepted that the LSD probably improves my work as long as I'm not actually on it while at work)).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30984852</id>
	<title>Re:Reason #2378238 not to be on Facebook</title>
	<author>DaVince21</author>
	<datestamp>1265054940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My friends are on there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My friends are on there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My friends are on there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30858374</id>
	<title>Re:SHOCKER</title>
	<author>precariousgray</author>
	<datestamp>1264167360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You can't even perform an action without some app or another prompting you "Do you want to post this on your profile? YES/<b>YES</b>".</p></div><p>There, I fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't even perform an action without some app or another prompting you " Do you want to post this on your profile ?
YES/YES " .There , I fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't even perform an action without some app or another prompting you "Do you want to post this on your profile?
YES/YES".There, I fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850846</id>
	<title>Re:The very idea of a "master password" seems scar</title>
	<author>krou</author>
	<datestamp>1264066920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They tried to change it, but once a password's been set to Chuck Norris, password changes just get fucked up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They tried to change it , but once a password 's been set to Chuck Norris , password changes just get fucked up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They tried to change it, but once a password's been set to Chuck Norris, password changes just get fucked up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853370</id>
	<title>That's odd</title>
	<author>Kynde</author>
	<datestamp>1264074960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The forementioned master password seems to work only on my account...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The forementioned master password seems to work only on my account.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The forementioned master password seems to work only on my account...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850406</id>
	<title>Re:Not the master password</title>
	<author>sunking2</author>
	<datestamp>1264065420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is revealed in the extended edition of Sneakers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is revealed in the extended edition of Sneakers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is revealed in the extended edition of Sneakers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850396</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264065360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you read the article, the "master password" wasn't really a master password. It only worked if you were in the Facebook offices on one of their computers. And if you had access to that, you almost certainly had access to the database too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you read the article , the " master password " was n't really a master password .
It only worked if you were in the Facebook offices on one of their computers .
And if you had access to that , you almost certainly had access to the database too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you read the article, the "master password" wasn't really a master password.
It only worked if you were in the Facebook offices on one of their computers.
And if you had access to that, you almost certainly had access to the database too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30924658</id>
	<title>Re:SHOCKER</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264587000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only in the movies (one movie actually, a foreign film starring Lee. Norris had a minor role at the beginning getting beat by Lee). Chuck Norris never fought Bruce Lee in any title fight.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only in the movies ( one movie actually , a foreign film starring Lee .
Norris had a minor role at the beginning getting beat by Lee ) .
Chuck Norris never fought Bruce Lee in any title fight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only in the movies (one movie actually, a foreign film starring Lee.
Norris had a minor role at the beginning getting beat by Lee).
Chuck Norris never fought Bruce Lee in any title fight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850118</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264107540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will he brute force his way in?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will he brute force his way in ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will he brute force his way in?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850126</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>Em Emalb</author>
	<datestamp>1264064400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Soviet Russia, passwords ask for Chuck Norris.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia , passwords ask for Chuck Norris .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia, passwords ask for Chuck Norris.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850318</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264065120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your making one large assumption there, that face book is more important than a teenagers first website.</p><p>Just because it has millions of users doesn't make it important, that site is essentially a recording of all the teenage girl conversations on the planet...aka, the most worthless data ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your making one large assumption there , that face book is more important than a teenagers first website.Just because it has millions of users does n't make it important , that site is essentially a recording of all the teenage girl conversations on the planet...aka , the most worthless data ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your making one large assumption there, that face book is more important than a teenagers first website.Just because it has millions of users doesn't make it important, that site is essentially a recording of all the teenage girl conversations on the planet...aka, the most worthless data ever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30857320</id>
	<title>fake</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1264151340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought about this after reading it last night. I'm pretty sure it's fake. What the guy says about PHP sounds a bit like someone who knows nothing about coding at all commenting on it yet trying to sound like they do.
<br> <br>
I think it sounds a bit too casual and there's too much swearing for someone who is already risking his job by talking. Making it appear as if a company is full of immature jerks (however true it is) won't go down well with your employer.
<br>br/</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought about this after reading it last night .
I 'm pretty sure it 's fake .
What the guy says about PHP sounds a bit like someone who knows nothing about coding at all commenting on it yet trying to sound like they do .
I think it sounds a bit too casual and there 's too much swearing for someone who is already risking his job by talking .
Making it appear as if a company is full of immature jerks ( however true it is ) wo n't go down well with your employer .
br/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought about this after reading it last night.
I'm pretty sure it's fake.
What the guy says about PHP sounds a bit like someone who knows nothing about coding at all commenting on it yet trying to sound like they do.
I think it sounds a bit too casual and there's too much swearing for someone who is already risking his job by talking.
Making it appear as if a company is full of immature jerks (however true it is) won't go down well with your employer.
br/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</id>
	<title>There's funny...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264064580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's funny, and then there's irresponsible. Having "Chuck Norris" as a master password that grants access to <b>any account</b> is most definitely the latter. I would expect that from a couple of teenagers running their first web server, not one of the most popular websites on the Internet.<br> <br>
There is a time and a place for silly HTML comments or in-joke variable names, but a master password for a site with hundreds of millions of users is not one of them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's funny , and then there 's irresponsible .
Having " Chuck Norris " as a master password that grants access to any account is most definitely the latter .
I would expect that from a couple of teenagers running their first web server , not one of the most popular websites on the Internet .
There is a time and a place for silly HTML comments or in-joke variable names , but a master password for a site with hundreds of millions of users is not one of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's funny, and then there's irresponsible.
Having "Chuck Norris" as a master password that grants access to any account is most definitely the latter.
I would expect that from a couple of teenagers running their first web server, not one of the most popular websites on the Internet.
There is a time and a place for silly HTML comments or in-joke variable names, but a master password for a site with hundreds of millions of users is not one of them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853618</id>
	<title>Re:SHOCKER</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1264075860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed. (and thank you for being one of the only comments not related to Chuck Norris) <br>
Inputing informations into facebook and expecting them to be kept private is a bit like lending money to a complete stranger and hoping it will turn out like a good investment. Facebook can be a useful tool (I actually learnt to like it) but just know what it is and what to expect from it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
( and thank you for being one of the only comments not related to Chuck Norris ) Inputing informations into facebook and expecting them to be kept private is a bit like lending money to a complete stranger and hoping it will turn out like a good investment .
Facebook can be a useful tool ( I actually learnt to like it ) but just know what it is and what to expect from it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
(and thank you for being one of the only comments not related to Chuck Norris) 
Inputing informations into facebook and expecting them to be kept private is a bit like lending money to a complete stranger and hoping it will turn out like a good investment.
Facebook can be a useful tool (I actually learnt to like it) but just know what it is and what to expect from it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152</id>
	<title>SHOCKER</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1264064460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Nearly everything you've ever done on the site is recorded into a database</p></div><p>Considering nearly everything you ever do on Facebook is made public to either your friends or everybody - thats not shocking at all. The entire system is basically built around informing everybody of everything you do. You can't even perform an action without some app or another prompting you "Do you want to post this on your profile? YES/NO".</p><p>And for those of you wondering, it's obvious what the new password is;</p><p>The only man to have ever beaten Chuck Norris? Bruce Lee.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nearly everything you 've ever done on the site is recorded into a databaseConsidering nearly everything you ever do on Facebook is made public to either your friends or everybody - thats not shocking at all .
The entire system is basically built around informing everybody of everything you do .
You ca n't even perform an action without some app or another prompting you " Do you want to post this on your profile ?
YES/NO " .And for those of you wondering , it 's obvious what the new password is ; The only man to have ever beaten Chuck Norris ?
Bruce Lee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nearly everything you've ever done on the site is recorded into a databaseConsidering nearly everything you ever do on Facebook is made public to either your friends or everybody - thats not shocking at all.
The entire system is basically built around informing everybody of everything you do.
You can't even perform an action without some app or another prompting you "Do you want to post this on your profile?
YES/NO".And for those of you wondering, it's obvious what the new password is;The only man to have ever beaten Chuck Norris?
Bruce Lee.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855684</id>
	<title>In other news...</title>
	<author>FragHARD</author>
	<datestamp>1264088880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This statement just released by a facebook representative:"It is sad that facebook has learned that their master password is in the wild , So we have elected to institute a new master password which will be 'roundhouse' this password will be guarded with all the technology we have available!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>This statement just released by a facebook representative : " It is sad that facebook has learned that their master password is in the wild , So we have elected to institute a new master password which will be 'roundhouse ' this password will be guarded with all the technology we have available !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This statement just released by a facebook representative:"It is sad that facebook has learned that their master password is in the wild , So we have elected to institute a new master password which will be 'roundhouse' this password will be guarded with all the technology we have available!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851572</id>
	<title>Re:The very idea of a "master password" seems scar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264069140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's obvious that the master password is Aryan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's obvious that the master password is Aryan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's obvious that the master password is Aryan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850798</id>
	<title>Re:SHOCKER</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1264066800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The only man to have ever beaten Chuck Norris? Bruce Lee.</p></div><p>Wow, they must both have been spectacular actors to pull off that flight of fantasy...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only man to have ever beaten Chuck Norris ?
Bruce Lee.Wow , they must both have been spectacular actors to pull off that flight of fantasy... ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only man to have ever beaten Chuck Norris?
Bruce Lee.Wow, they must both have been spectacular actors to pull off that flight of fantasy... ;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850346</id>
	<title>Domain Admin</title>
	<author>igadget78</author>
	<datestamp>1264065180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I found my new password.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well ... I found my new password .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well ... I found my new password.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854770</id>
	<title>Re:TFA accuracy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264081500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You don't have any friends.</p></div><p>Because of how unlikeable you are. It says so here in your personnel file: Unlikeable. Liked by no one. A bitter, unlikeable loner whose passing shall not be mourned. 'Shall not be mourned.'</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; -GLaDOS</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't have any friends.Because of how unlikeable you are .
It says so here in your personnel file : Unlikeable .
Liked by no one .
A bitter , unlikeable loner whose passing shall not be mourned .
'Shall not be mourned .
'       -GLaDOS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't have any friends.Because of how unlikeable you are.
It says so here in your personnel file: Unlikeable.
Liked by no one.
A bitter, unlikeable loner whose passing shall not be mourned.
'Shall not be mourned.
'
      -GLaDOS
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851516</id>
	<title>The only man to have ever beaten Chuck Norris?</title>
	<author>hackwrench</author>
	<datestamp>1264068960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Norris was defeated in his first two tournaments, dropping decisions to Joe Lewis and Allen Steen and three matches at the International Karate Championships to Tony Tulleners. By 1967 Norris had improved enough that he scored victories over the likes of Lewis, Skipper Mullins, Arnold Urquidez, Victor Moore, Ron Marchini, and Steve Sanders. In early 1968, Norris suffered the tenth and last loss of his career, losing an upset decision to Louis Delgado.<br>
From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck\_Norris" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck\_Norris</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Norris was defeated in his first two tournaments , dropping decisions to Joe Lewis and Allen Steen and three matches at the International Karate Championships to Tony Tulleners .
By 1967 Norris had improved enough that he scored victories over the likes of Lewis , Skipper Mullins , Arnold Urquidez , Victor Moore , Ron Marchini , and Steve Sanders .
In early 1968 , Norris suffered the tenth and last loss of his career , losing an upset decision to Louis Delgado .
From http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck \ _Norris [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Norris was defeated in his first two tournaments, dropping decisions to Joe Lewis and Allen Steen and three matches at the International Karate Championships to Tony Tulleners.
By 1967 Norris had improved enough that he scored victories over the likes of Lewis, Skipper Mullins, Arnold Urquidez, Victor Moore, Ron Marchini, and Steve Sanders.
In early 1968, Norris suffered the tenth and last loss of his career, losing an upset decision to Louis Delgado.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck\_Norris [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850190</id>
	<title>The facebooks master password was NOT Chuck Norris</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264064640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It just so happens that every computer system everywhere on the planet at all times can be rooted with the Chuck Norris password, given its infinite power.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It just so happens that every computer system everywhere on the planet at all times can be rooted with the Chuck Norris password , given its infinite power .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It just so happens that every computer system everywhere on the planet at all times can be rooted with the Chuck Norris password, given its infinite power.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380</id>
	<title>The very idea of a "master password" seems scary..</title>
	<author>mi</author>
	<datestamp>1264065300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder, what it is now... "Angelina Jolie"? "Bruce Willis"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder , what it is now... " Angelina Jolie " ?
" Bruce Willis " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder, what it is now... "Angelina Jolie"?
"Bruce Willis"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856008</id>
	<title>Re:Reason #2378238 not to be on Facebook</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1264091760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... Just be careful of what you write in profile...It's not like they are watching you from a satellite and posting pics of you every 5 mins without your consent, they publish what YOU publish.</p></div><p>I often talk about acquaintances on my profile who are careful on facebook or even those who never used facebook and tag embarrassing photos of them as well! I don't have a satellite cam, but if I did I would update those photos every five seconds. So, no matter how smart people are with facebook, their retard frienemies, like me, will be there violating their privacy.</p><p>Facebook publishes what EVERYONE publishes and further adds it to their database that stores it permanantly!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... Just be careful of what you write in profile...It 's not like they are watching you from a satellite and posting pics of you every 5 mins without your consent , they publish what YOU publish.I often talk about acquaintances on my profile who are careful on facebook or even those who never used facebook and tag embarrassing photos of them as well !
I do n't have a satellite cam , but if I did I would update those photos every five seconds .
So , no matter how smart people are with facebook , their retard frienemies , like me , will be there violating their privacy.Facebook publishes what EVERYONE publishes and further adds it to their database that stores it permanantly !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... Just be careful of what you write in profile...It's not like they are watching you from a satellite and posting pics of you every 5 mins without your consent, they publish what YOU publish.I often talk about acquaintances on my profile who are careful on facebook or even those who never used facebook and tag embarrassing photos of them as well!
I don't have a satellite cam, but if I did I would update those photos every five seconds.
So, no matter how smart people are with facebook, their retard frienemies, like me, will be there violating their privacy.Facebook publishes what EVERYONE publishes and further adds it to their database that stores it permanantly!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851126</id>
	<title>Re:Reason #2378238 not to be on Facebook</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1264067820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Summary is a troll. The password was not plaintext (ok, l33t isn't that much more secure.) Just the same, the summary is a troll because this password only works if you're logged in at Facebook HQ - so basically it's like a database password. There's no real reason to secure this any more zealously than you would a database password, because it's just as secure. If someone's in a position to use the Chuck Norris password, they've already broken Facebook's security, or they are responsible for Facebook in some manner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Summary is a troll .
The password was not plaintext ( ok , l33t is n't that much more secure .
) Just the same , the summary is a troll because this password only works if you 're logged in at Facebook HQ - so basically it 's like a database password .
There 's no real reason to secure this any more zealously than you would a database password , because it 's just as secure .
If someone 's in a position to use the Chuck Norris password , they 've already broken Facebook 's security , or they are responsible for Facebook in some manner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Summary is a troll.
The password was not plaintext (ok, l33t isn't that much more secure.
) Just the same, the summary is a troll because this password only works if you're logged in at Facebook HQ - so basically it's like a database password.
There's no real reason to secure this any more zealously than you would a database password, because it's just as secure.
If someone's in a position to use the Chuck Norris password, they've already broken Facebook's security, or they are responsible for Facebook in some manner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852450</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>cpscotti</author>
	<datestamp>1264071780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RTFA; it just worked if you were inside facebook's infrastructure, inside the building itself.. so... it's even responsible that they had a password in the first place...</p><p>And even then If you think about it..  Chuck Norris is MUCH better than <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permissive\_Action\_Links" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">00000000</a> [wikipedia.org] </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RTFA ; it just worked if you were inside facebook 's infrastructure , inside the building itself.. so... it 's even responsible that they had a password in the first place...And even then If you think about it.. Chuck Norris is MUCH better than 00000000 [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RTFA; it just worked if you were inside facebook's infrastructure, inside the building itself.. so... it's even responsible that they had a password in the first place...And even then If you think about it..  Chuck Norris is MUCH better than 00000000 [wikipedia.org] </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853032</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1264073760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's pretty normal for support personnel to have access to production systems in order to provide support.</p></div><p>Right.  Every IT support job I've had, I've made it widely known within the company, "I can read your email."  It's not "I want to read your email," or "I will read your email," but "I am able to read your email and I may have to under some weird circumstances.  If there's any personal information that you're too embarrassed for me to know, don't put it in your work email."
</p><p>Ultimately we should all understand that email isn't completely secure unless you encrypt it.  Your search habits aren't secure, and neither is your Facebook profile.  Of course Facebook should, as a matter of policy, avoid invading your privacy without good reason, but <i>of course</i> there are employees at Facebook who have full access to the database and are technically able to read everything you post.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's pretty normal for support personnel to have access to production systems in order to provide support.Right .
Every IT support job I 've had , I 've made it widely known within the company , " I can read your email .
" It 's not " I want to read your email , " or " I will read your email , " but " I am able to read your email and I may have to under some weird circumstances .
If there 's any personal information that you 're too embarrassed for me to know , do n't put it in your work email .
" Ultimately we should all understand that email is n't completely secure unless you encrypt it .
Your search habits are n't secure , and neither is your Facebook profile .
Of course Facebook should , as a matter of policy , avoid invading your privacy without good reason , but of course there are employees at Facebook who have full access to the database and are technically able to read everything you post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's pretty normal for support personnel to have access to production systems in order to provide support.Right.
Every IT support job I've had, I've made it widely known within the company, "I can read your email.
"  It's not "I want to read your email," or "I will read your email," but "I am able to read your email and I may have to under some weird circumstances.
If there's any personal information that you're too embarrassed for me to know, don't put it in your work email.
"
Ultimately we should all understand that email isn't completely secure unless you encrypt it.
Your search habits aren't secure, and neither is your Facebook profile.
Of course Facebook should, as a matter of policy, avoid invading your privacy without good reason, but of course there are employees at Facebook who have full access to the database and are technically able to read everything you post.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30858028</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264162860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since when was this a hinder for Chuck Norris?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when was this a hinder for Chuck Norris ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when was this a hinder for Chuck Norris?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856760</id>
	<title>This just in...</title>
	<author>MrPerfekt</author>
	<datestamp>1264100580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Administrators of websites can access your accounts. Oh my word!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Administrators of websites can access your accounts .
Oh my word !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Administrators of websites can access your accounts.
Oh my word!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852076</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris Jokes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264070580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah?  Well Chuck Norris says he's keeping it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah ?
Well Chuck Norris says he 's keeping it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah?
Well Chuck Norris says he's keeping it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850138</id>
	<title>Reason #2378238 not to be on Facebook</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264064460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like you need another reason?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like you need another reason ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like you need another reason?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096</id>
	<title>Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264107420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>doesn't need a password.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>does n't need a password .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>doesn't need a password.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851822</id>
	<title>Re:Not the master password</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264069860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somehow I don't want access to my sister's pants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow I do n't want access to my sister 's pants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow I don't want access to my sister's pants.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853202</id>
	<title>CN had no style</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264074300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He may have been a good textbook fighter, but he lacked style, and lacked speed.  Today, he lacks youth.  He's an OLD OLD man.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He may have been a good textbook fighter , but he lacked style , and lacked speed .
Today , he lacks youth .
He 's an OLD OLD man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He may have been a good textbook fighter, but he lacked style, and lacked speed.
Today, he lacks youth.
He's an OLD OLD man.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851378</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>c-reus</author>
	<datestamp>1264068540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you happen to hear about the news about some Chinese cracking into Google computers?</p><p>I guess the point is that having a master password that works only in internal network is OK only as long as nobody breaks into that internal network</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you happen to hear about the news about some Chinese cracking into Google computers ? I guess the point is that having a master password that works only in internal network is OK only as long as nobody breaks into that internal network</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you happen to hear about the news about some Chinese cracking into Google computers?I guess the point is that having a master password that works only in internal network is OK only as long as nobody breaks into that internal network</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850510</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264065780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was a complicated l33tspeak representation of Chuck Norris, which was only usable from the Facebook offices and which caused additional logging.</p><p>To my mind, perfectly reasonable as such access is necessary for testing and troubleshooting.</p><p>The only WTF (and not a huge one) is that deleted messages are kept around indefinitely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a complicated l33tspeak representation of Chuck Norris , which was only usable from the Facebook offices and which caused additional logging.To my mind , perfectly reasonable as such access is necessary for testing and troubleshooting.The only WTF ( and not a huge one ) is that deleted messages are kept around indefinitely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a complicated l33tspeak representation of Chuck Norris, which was only usable from the Facebook offices and which caused additional logging.To my mind, perfectly reasonable as such access is necessary for testing and troubleshooting.The only WTF (and not a huge one) is that deleted messages are kept around indefinitely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30857430</id>
	<title>This is so stupid</title>
	<author>codeButcher</author>
	<datestamp>1264153560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Everyone knows that Chuck does not need a surname.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone knows that Chuck does not need a surname .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone knows that Chuck does not need a surname.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850632</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>coyotetwilightstudio</author>
	<datestamp>1264066320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The real password here is the Chuck Norris Roundhouse kick to the Face..book to gain access.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real password here is the Chuck Norris Roundhouse kick to the Face..book to gain access .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real password here is the Chuck Norris Roundhouse kick to the Face..book to gain access.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851004</id>
	<title>But it only works ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264067520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The real WTF is that "Chuck Norris" works as a password into anything: Facebook, your online bank account, your sister's pants...</i></p><p>But it only works for Chuck Norris.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real WTF is that " Chuck Norris " works as a password into anything : Facebook , your online bank account , your sister 's pants...But it only works for Chuck Norris .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real WTF is that "Chuck Norris" works as a password into anything: Facebook, your online bank account, your sister's pants...But it only works for Chuck Norris.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854302</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264078920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The summary is incorrect. He says the password used symbols etc and looked like Chuck Norris, but was not exactly "Chuck Norris". Also this password only worked if you were at the facebook office.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary is incorrect .
He says the password used symbols etc and looked like Chuck Norris , but was not exactly " Chuck Norris " .
Also this password only worked if you were at the facebook office .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary is incorrect.
He says the password used symbols etc and looked like Chuck Norris, but was not exactly "Chuck Norris".
Also this password only worked if you were at the facebook office.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852810</id>
	<title>Re:SHOCKER</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1264072860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem is that people pretend that it matters.</p><p>Facebook is  for attention whores who want other people to know details about their lives.  Its fucking retarded to talk about privacy when the whole point is giving out your information.</p><p>I know of 1 person with a facebook profile who isn't an attention whore, and they use it just so they can spy on others.</p><p>No one with a facebook account has any room to bitch about privacy, those that do are just using a different method of attention whoring, either way the result is the same.</p><p>The solution is relatively simple.  Population control.  I've also yet to meet anyone with a Facebook account that is actually useful to the world, so the next step would be to use the facebook account list to terminate a large number of morons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is that people pretend that it matters.Facebook is for attention whores who want other people to know details about their lives .
Its fucking retarded to talk about privacy when the whole point is giving out your information.I know of 1 person with a facebook profile who is n't an attention whore , and they use it just so they can spy on others.No one with a facebook account has any room to bitch about privacy , those that do are just using a different method of attention whoring , either way the result is the same.The solution is relatively simple .
Population control .
I 've also yet to meet anyone with a Facebook account that is actually useful to the world , so the next step would be to use the facebook account list to terminate a large number of morons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is that people pretend that it matters.Facebook is  for attention whores who want other people to know details about their lives.
Its fucking retarded to talk about privacy when the whole point is giving out your information.I know of 1 person with a facebook profile who isn't an attention whore, and they use it just so they can spy on others.No one with a facebook account has any room to bitch about privacy, those that do are just using a different method of attention whoring, either way the result is the same.The solution is relatively simple.
Population control.
I've also yet to meet anyone with a Facebook account that is actually useful to the world, so the next step would be to use the facebook account list to terminate a large number of morons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850240</id>
	<title>Re:Not the master password</title>
	<author>Zarf</author>
	<datestamp>1264064880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try this when attempting to enter a club. When the bouncer denies you entry point and say, "Chuck Norris" while he is cowering for his life enter the club.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try this when attempting to enter a club .
When the bouncer denies you entry point and say , " Chuck Norris " while he is cowering for his life enter the club .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try this when attempting to enter a club.
When the bouncer denies you entry point and say, "Chuck Norris" while he is cowering for his life enter the club.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850428</id>
	<title>Re:TFA accuracy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264065480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't have any friends.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't have any friends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't have any friends.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30865724</id>
	<title>Re:The very idea of a "master password" seems scar</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1264168380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; I wonder, what it is now... "Angelina Jolie"? "Bruce Willis"?<br><br>Actually, it's Tokugawa Mujahibamidad Prolszinoczewski Cohen now.  They wanted to be more culturally inclusive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I wonder , what it is now... " Angelina Jolie " ?
" Bruce Willis " ? Actually , it 's Tokugawa Mujahibamidad Prolszinoczewski Cohen now .
They wanted to be more culturally inclusive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I wonder, what it is now... "Angelina Jolie"?
"Bruce Willis"?Actually, it's Tokugawa Mujahibamidad Prolszinoczewski Cohen now.
They wanted to be more culturally inclusive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850412</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Ma8thew</author>
	<datestamp>1264065420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>RTFA. Firstly, it wasn't just "Chuck Norris", the interviewee didn't reveal the actual password, but suggested it included numbers and symbols. And secondly, it only worked within Facebook's internal network.</htmltext>
<tokenext>RTFA .
Firstly , it was n't just " Chuck Norris " , the interviewee did n't reveal the actual password , but suggested it included numbers and symbols .
And secondly , it only worked within Facebook 's internal network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RTFA.
Firstly, it wasn't just "Chuck Norris", the interviewee didn't reveal the actual password, but suggested it included numbers and symbols.
And secondly, it only worked within Facebook's internal network.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854858</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1264082040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is an appropriate password?</p><p>At my workplace I have had to come across many passwords that were not meant to be shared by many and they get funky. My favorite was the discovery that supervisor used a certain female hygiene product to log in to the servers everyday. And the passwords that we share with everyone? Very appropriate and very guessable given their use.</p><p>Now that we know it was derived from Chuck Norris everyone seems to think it would be the first meme you would guess, but its not. You would have used a million other internet memes and celebrity names before you tried Chuck Norris.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is an appropriate password ? At my workplace I have had to come across many passwords that were not meant to be shared by many and they get funky .
My favorite was the discovery that supervisor used a certain female hygiene product to log in to the servers everyday .
And the passwords that we share with everyone ?
Very appropriate and very guessable given their use.Now that we know it was derived from Chuck Norris everyone seems to think it would be the first meme you would guess , but its not .
You would have used a million other internet memes and celebrity names before you tried Chuck Norris .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is an appropriate password?At my workplace I have had to come across many passwords that were not meant to be shared by many and they get funky.
My favorite was the discovery that supervisor used a certain female hygiene product to log in to the servers everyday.
And the passwords that we share with everyone?
Very appropriate and very guessable given their use.Now that we know it was derived from Chuck Norris everyone seems to think it would be the first meme you would guess, but its not.
You would have used a million other internet memes and celebrity names before you tried Chuck Norris.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852314</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>MarkRose</author>
	<datestamp>1264071360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>(hu(|&lt;N0rr15</i> </p><p> <b>Wait a minute... that's the combination on my luggage!</b> </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( hu ( | Wait a minute... that 's the combination on my luggage !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> (hu(|  Wait a minute... that's the combination on my luggage! </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853082</id>
	<title>Re:Not the master password</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1264073880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you can get into my sisters facebook account you can probably get into her pants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you can get into my sisters facebook account you can probably get into her pants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can get into my sisters facebook account you can probably get into her pants.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850334</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris Jokes</title>
	<author>Em Emalb</author>
	<datestamp>1264065180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chuck Norris doesn't leave a room.</p><p>He lingers like a curry fart.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chuck Norris does n't leave a room.He lingers like a curry fart .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chuck Norris doesn't leave a room.He lingers like a curry fart.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856498</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264097040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, he will bruce schneier his way in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , he will bruce schneier his way in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, he will bruce schneier his way in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30859842</id>
	<title>Engraving "Chuck Norris" on the floor</title>
	<author>Explodicle</author>
	<datestamp>1264177980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>will cause nearby monsters to flee.</htmltext>
<tokenext>will cause nearby monsters to flee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will cause nearby monsters to flee.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Rary</author>
	<datestamp>1264065420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's funny, and then there's irresponsible. Having "Chuck Norris" as a master password that grants access to any account is most definitely the latter. I would expect that from a couple of teenagers running their first web server, not one of the most popular websites on the Internet.</p></div><p>Despite what the summary and title say, the password was not "Chuck Norris". The password was a combination of uppercase letters, lowercase letters, numbers, and symbols that essentially spelled "Chuck Norris". In other words, probably something like "(hu(|&lt;N0rr15". Also, it only worked from within the Facebook office, and was only known to certain individuals. It's not like you or I could have used the password from home to enter anyone's account.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>There is a time and a place for silly HTML comments or in-joke variable names, but a master password for a site with hundreds of millions of users is not one of them.</p></div><p>It's pretty normal for support personnel to have access to production systems in order to provide support.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's funny , and then there 's irresponsible .
Having " Chuck Norris " as a master password that grants access to any account is most definitely the latter .
I would expect that from a couple of teenagers running their first web server , not one of the most popular websites on the Internet.Despite what the summary and title say , the password was not " Chuck Norris " .
The password was a combination of uppercase letters , lowercase letters , numbers , and symbols that essentially spelled " Chuck Norris " .
In other words , probably something like " ( hu ( | There is a time and a place for silly HTML comments or in-joke variable names , but a master password for a site with hundreds of millions of users is not one of them.It 's pretty normal for support personnel to have access to production systems in order to provide support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's funny, and then there's irresponsible.
Having "Chuck Norris" as a master password that grants access to any account is most definitely the latter.
I would expect that from a couple of teenagers running their first web server, not one of the most popular websites on the Internet.Despite what the summary and title say, the password was not "Chuck Norris".
The password was a combination of uppercase letters, lowercase letters, numbers, and symbols that essentially spelled "Chuck Norris".
In other words, probably something like "(hu(|There is a time and a place for silly HTML comments or in-joke variable names, but a master password for a site with hundreds of millions of users is not one of them.It's pretty normal for support personnel to have access to production systems in order to provide support.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852226</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>jimfinity</author>
	<datestamp>1264071060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's true that Chuck Norris was the password, but not just anyone could use it.</p><p>FTFA</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I should also say that it was only available internally. If I were to log in from a high school or library, I couldn&rsquo;t use it. You had to be in the Facebook office, using the Facebook ISP.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's true that Chuck Norris was the password , but not just anyone could use it.FTFAI should also say that it was only available internally .
If I were to log in from a high school or library , I couldn    t use it .
You had to be in the Facebook office , using the Facebook ISP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's true that Chuck Norris was the password, but not just anyone could use it.FTFAI should also say that it was only available internally.
If I were to log in from a high school or library, I couldn’t use it.
You had to be in the Facebook office, using the Facebook ISP.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850392</id>
	<title>Re:Not the master password</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264065360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>relatedly, -your- sister's pants don't need a password at all to access</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>relatedly , -your- sister 's pants do n't need a password at all to access</tokentext>
<sentencetext>relatedly, -your- sister's pants don't need a password at all to access</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850650</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1264066380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>To be fair it wasn't "Chuck Norris" but used a combination of symbols, numbers and letters to spell that out in some way and then required you to be within the network. Not ideal  but not that irresponsible either. Certainly not as irresponsible as putting your whole life onto Facebook.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair it was n't " Chuck Norris " but used a combination of symbols , numbers and letters to spell that out in some way and then required you to be within the network .
Not ideal but not that irresponsible either .
Certainly not as irresponsible as putting your whole life onto Facebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair it wasn't "Chuck Norris" but used a combination of symbols, numbers and letters to spell that out in some way and then required you to be within the network.
Not ideal  but not that irresponsible either.
Certainly not as irresponsible as putting your whole life onto Facebook.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854220</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>Sparx139</author>
	<datestamp>1264078380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you use firefox, there's a greasefire script called <a href="http://greasefire.userscripts.org/scripts/show/37311" title="userscripts.org" rel="nofollow">Moderatrix</a> [userscripts.org] that adds a confirmation button to the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. moderating system.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you use firefox , there 's a greasefire script called Moderatrix [ userscripts.org ] that adds a confirmation button to the / .
moderating system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you use firefox, there's a greasefire script called Moderatrix [userscripts.org] that adds a confirmation button to the /.
moderating system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851222</id>
	<title>Re:Not the master password</title>
	<author>rethgir</author>
	<datestamp>1264068120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's not Facebook's fault: it's not like they actually set the master password to "Chuck Norris".</p><p>The real WTF is that "Chuck Norris" works as a password into <i>anything</i>: Facebook, your online bank account, your sister's pants...</p></div><p>You're getting your forums mixed up... I think you're looking for <a href="http://thedailywtf.com/" title="thedailywtf.com" rel="nofollow">http://thedailywtf.com/</a> [thedailywtf.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not Facebook 's fault : it 's not like they actually set the master password to " Chuck Norris " .The real WTF is that " Chuck Norris " works as a password into anything : Facebook , your online bank account , your sister 's pants...You 're getting your forums mixed up... I think you 're looking for http : //thedailywtf.com/ [ thedailywtf.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not Facebook's fault: it's not like they actually set the master password to "Chuck Norris".The real WTF is that "Chuck Norris" works as a password into anything: Facebook, your online bank account, your sister's pants...You're getting your forums mixed up... I think you're looking for http://thedailywtf.com/ [thedailywtf.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852730</id>
	<title>Re:Not the master password</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264072680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My sisters' pants password is "Chuck Norris"? Ooh. I'll be having fun tonight!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My sisters ' pants password is " Chuck Norris " ?
Ooh. I 'll be having fun tonight !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My sisters' pants password is "Chuck Norris"?
Ooh. I'll be having fun tonight!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856628</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris Jokes</title>
	<author>Gizzmonic</author>
	<datestamp>1264098600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aww, did I piss off a moderator?  You're probably the guy that forwards all the Chuck Norris jokes and thinks repeating Simpsons and Monty Python quotes verbatim is <b>hilarious</b>.  Congradulations, you're a dickhole!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aww , did I piss off a moderator ?
You 're probably the guy that forwards all the Chuck Norris jokes and thinks repeating Simpsons and Monty Python quotes verbatim is hilarious .
Congradulations , you 're a dickhole !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aww, did I piss off a moderator?
You're probably the guy that forwards all the Chuck Norris jokes and thinks repeating Simpsons and Monty Python quotes verbatim is hilarious.
Congradulations, you're a dickhole!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855920</id>
	<title>Bruce Lee password will change in a couple weeks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264090740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bruce Lee didn't defeat Chuck Norris.</p><p>It's obvious that Sun Tzu teaches about deception, and Chuck Norris knew that a feigned loss and a delayed-kill is the only way to win one over Bruce Lee the Dragon of HonkyKong</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bruce Lee did n't defeat Chuck Norris.It 's obvious that Sun Tzu teaches about deception , and Chuck Norris knew that a feigned loss and a delayed-kill is the only way to win one over Bruce Lee the Dragon of HonkyKong</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bruce Lee didn't defeat Chuck Norris.It's obvious that Sun Tzu teaches about deception, and Chuck Norris knew that a feigned loss and a delayed-kill is the only way to win one over Bruce Lee the Dragon of HonkyKong</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30857836</id>
	<title>Strongest password in the world</title>
	<author>PMBjornerud</author>
	<datestamp>1264160580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see the problem here.</p><p>Q: What is the strongest pasword in the world?<br>A: "Chuck Norris"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see the problem here.Q : What is the strongest pasword in the world ? A : " Chuck Norris "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see the problem here.Q: What is the strongest pasword in the world?A: "Chuck Norris"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852366</id>
	<title>How about Chuck Moore?</title>
	<author>lennier</author>
	<datestamp>1264071480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>True Chuck Moore facts:</p><p><a href="http://www.simple-talk.com/content/print.aspx?article=775" title="simple-talk.com">Chuck Moore wrote his own VLSI chip design system. In Forth.</a> [simple-talk.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>True Chuck Moore facts : Chuck Moore wrote his own VLSI chip design system .
In Forth .
[ simple-talk.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True Chuck Moore facts:Chuck Moore wrote his own VLSI chip design system.
In Forth.
[simple-talk.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852088</id>
	<title>Re:Reason #2378238 not to be on Facebook</title>
	<author>crazybit</author>
	<datestamp>1264070640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>why does everything has to be black or white? Just be careful of what you write in profile (I only post when I want to drive traffic to some link), and don't friend people you don't/barely know. It is much safe to have a controlled profile than risking yourself to be subject of a fake profile.<br> <br>The problem are not the tools, but how people use/misuse them. If you are smart enough you can make this service (or any other service) work fine without exposing yourself. It's not like they are watching you from a satellite and posting pics of you every 5 mins without your consent, they publish what YOU publish.</htmltext>
<tokenext>why does everything has to be black or white ?
Just be careful of what you write in profile ( I only post when I want to drive traffic to some link ) , and do n't friend people you do n't/barely know .
It is much safe to have a controlled profile than risking yourself to be subject of a fake profile .
The problem are not the tools , but how people use/misuse them .
If you are smart enough you can make this service ( or any other service ) work fine without exposing yourself .
It 's not like they are watching you from a satellite and posting pics of you every 5 mins without your consent , they publish what YOU publish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why does everything has to be black or white?
Just be careful of what you write in profile (I only post when I want to drive traffic to some link), and don't friend people you don't/barely know.
It is much safe to have a controlled profile than risking yourself to be subject of a fake profile.
The problem are not the tools, but how people use/misuse them.
If you are smart enough you can make this service (or any other service) work fine without exposing yourself.
It's not like they are watching you from a satellite and posting pics of you every 5 mins without your consent, they publish what YOU publish.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852122</id>
	<title>Stanford?</title>
	<author>qortra</author>
	<datestamp>1264070760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTFA:<p><div class="quote"><p>I don't think there's any question that Stanford is the number one CS department in the world.</p></div><p>Wow, there's so much question, it's ridiculous. According to US News and World Reports 2008 (the most recent I could find), it was tied with Berkeley and MIT for #1, and even that is being generous.  For a while, it was Carnegie and MIT alternating between 1 and 2 every year. Perhaps she meant "the best entrepreneurial CS program".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFA : I do n't think there 's any question that Stanford is the number one CS department in the world.Wow , there 's so much question , it 's ridiculous .
According to US News and World Reports 2008 ( the most recent I could find ) , it was tied with Berkeley and MIT for # 1 , and even that is being generous .
For a while , it was Carnegie and MIT alternating between 1 and 2 every year .
Perhaps she meant " the best entrepreneurial CS program " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTFA:I don't think there's any question that Stanford is the number one CS department in the world.Wow, there's so much question, it's ridiculous.
According to US News and World Reports 2008 (the most recent I could find), it was tied with Berkeley and MIT for #1, and even that is being generous.
For a while, it was Carnegie and MIT alternating between 1 and 2 every year.
Perhaps she meant "the best entrepreneurial CS program".
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850342</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>InlawBiker</author>
	<datestamp>1264065180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good one.  Replying to remove my mistaken Overrated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good one .
Replying to remove my mistaken Overrated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good one.
Replying to remove my mistaken Overrated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853344</id>
	<title>L33t Speak Converted</title>
	<author>Kynde</author>
	<datestamp>1264074840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I'm not going to give you the exact password, but with upper and lower case, symbols, numbers, all of the above, it spelled out 'Chuck Norris,' more or less.</i></p><p>Lemme guess:<br>(|-|U(| |\|0RR15</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not going to give you the exact password , but with upper and lower case , symbols , numbers , all of the above , it spelled out 'Chuck Norris, ' more or less.Lem me guess : ( | - | U ( | | \ | 0RR15</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not going to give you the exact password, but with upper and lower case, symbols, numbers, all of the above, it spelled out 'Chuck Norris,' more or less.Lemme guess:(|-|U(| |\|0RR15</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855716</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>changedx</author>
	<datestamp>1264089180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>*And* it wasn't exactly the string "Chuck Norris".  From TFA:
<br> <br>
&gt; I'm not going to give you the exact password, but with upper and lower case, symbols, numbers, all of the above, it spelled out 'Chuck Norris,' more or less.</htmltext>
<tokenext>* And * it was n't exactly the string " Chuck Norris " .
From TFA : &gt; I 'm not going to give you the exact password , but with upper and lower case , symbols , numbers , all of the above , it spelled out 'Chuck Norris, ' more or less .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*And* it wasn't exactly the string "Chuck Norris".
From TFA:
 
&gt; I'm not going to give you the exact password, but with upper and lower case, symbols, numbers, all of the above, it spelled out 'Chuck Norris,' more or less.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850872</id>
	<title>Re:Not the master password</title>
	<author>goontz</author>
	<datestamp>1264067100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More importantly, why do you want the password to your own sister's pants?</htmltext>
<tokenext>More importantly , why do you want the password to your own sister 's pants ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More importantly, why do you want the password to your own sister's pants?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851798</id>
	<title>Blasphemy!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264069800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA:<p><div class="quote"><p>Employee: See, the thing is &mdash; and I don&rsquo;t know how much you know about it &mdash; it&rsquo;s all stored in a database on the backend. Literally everything. Your messages are stored in a database, whether deleted or not. So we can just query the database, and easily look at it without every logging into your account. That&rsquo;s what most people don&rsquo;t understand..</p></div><p>
Is this a cover of "Duh" magazine???  This holds true for just about every content / banking / email /<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....ANY website ever created!!  Does this guy know how websites work???  Did his uncle get him a job there???
<br> <br>
Indeed, this very message...its now been persisted to a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...*ghasp*.... database!
<br> <br>
Chuck Norris!  Chuck Norris!  ITS NOT WORKING!!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : Employee : See , the thing is    and I don    t know how much you know about it    it    s all stored in a database on the backend .
Literally everything .
Your messages are stored in a database , whether deleted or not .
So we can just query the database , and easily look at it without every logging into your account .
That    s what most people don    t understand. . Is this a cover of " Duh " magazine ? ? ?
This holds true for just about every content / banking / email / ....ANY website ever created ! !
Does this guy know how websites work ? ? ?
Did his uncle get him a job there ? ? ?
Indeed , this very message...its now been persisted to a ... * ghasp * .... database ! Chuck Norris !
Chuck Norris !
ITS NOT WORKING ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:Employee: See, the thing is — and I don’t know how much you know about it — it’s all stored in a database on the backend.
Literally everything.
Your messages are stored in a database, whether deleted or not.
So we can just query the database, and easily look at it without every logging into your account.
That’s what most people don’t understand..
Is this a cover of "Duh" magazine???
This holds true for just about every content / banking / email / ....ANY website ever created!!
Does this guy know how websites work???
Did his uncle get him a job there???
Indeed, this very message...its now been persisted to a ...*ghasp*.... database!
 
Chuck Norris!
Chuck Norris!
ITS NOT WORKING!!
!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850672</id>
	<title>Re:The very idea of a "master password" seems scar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264066440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wonder, what it is now... "Angelina Jolie"? "Bruce Willis"?</p></div><p>Obama</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder , what it is now... " Angelina Jolie " ?
" Bruce Willis " ? Obama</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder, what it is now... "Angelina Jolie"?
"Bruce Willis"?Obama
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850400</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>carvell</author>
	<datestamp>1264065360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The default password only worked from the Facebook office on the Facebook ISP.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The default password only worked from the Facebook office on the Facebook ISP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The default password only worked from the Facebook office on the Facebook ISP.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850144</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264064460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/01/21/1313235" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">123456</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>123456 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>123456 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851044</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>mukund</author>
	<datestamp>1264067640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bender doesn't *need* to drink.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bender does n't * need * to drink .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bender doesn't *need* to drink.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850920</id>
	<title>Re:Not the master password</title>
	<author>krou</author>
	<datestamp>1264067280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>your sister's pants...</p></div></blockquote><p>

Please tell me you didn't use this line to get into your sister's pants<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>your sister 's pants.. . Please tell me you did n't use this line to get into your sister 's pants .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>your sister's pants...

Please tell me you didn't use this line to get into your sister's pants ...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851180</id>
	<title>Re:TFA accuracy?</title>
	<author>b4k3d b34nz</author>
	<datestamp>1264068000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Think of someone in your friends list and search for them, and click through to their profile. Do it a few times, and at some point today or tomorrow you'll see them come up as the first result in a search.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of someone in your friends list and search for them , and click through to their profile .
Do it a few times , and at some point today or tomorrow you 'll see them come up as the first result in a search .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of someone in your friends list and search for them, and click through to their profile.
Do it a few times, and at some point today or tomorrow you'll see them come up as the first result in a search.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855840</id>
	<title>Perfect password</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264090140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chuck Norris is the perfect password it is impossible to hack or brute force; but it can also beat the crap out of any other password out there; he is the Irresistible Force and the Immovable Object.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chuck Norris is the perfect password it is impossible to hack or brute force ; but it can also beat the crap out of any other password out there ; he is the Irresistible Force and the Immovable Object .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chuck Norris is the perfect password it is impossible to hack or brute force; but it can also beat the crap out of any other password out there; he is the Irresistible Force and the Immovable Object.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855494</id>
	<title>the biggest busiest sysadmin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264087320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ever in the world</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ever in the world</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ever in the world</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30858398</id>
	<title>Gee, really?</title>
	<author>Grayzie5</author>
	<datestamp>1264167960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is no privacy.  In a great many cases every URL you visit is recorded by your ISP and sold to third party companies that mine it and create spurious interpretations of it to sell their front end to marketing departments.

This is nothing different.  Every site records activity.  It's just the personal nature of the activity that makes the idea of Facebook doing it so discomforting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no privacy .
In a great many cases every URL you visit is recorded by your ISP and sold to third party companies that mine it and create spurious interpretations of it to sell their front end to marketing departments .
This is nothing different .
Every site records activity .
It 's just the personal nature of the activity that makes the idea of Facebook doing it so discomforting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no privacy.
In a great many cases every URL you visit is recorded by your ISP and sold to third party companies that mine it and create spurious interpretations of it to sell their front end to marketing departments.
This is nothing different.
Every site records activity.
It's just the personal nature of the activity that makes the idea of Facebook doing it so discomforting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850364</id>
	<title>Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>SoundGuyNoise</author>
	<datestamp>1264065240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>...can actually type ******** into any system and login successfully.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...can actually type * * * * * * * * into any system and login successfully .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...can actually type ******** into any system and login successfully.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854116</id>
	<title>I don't need 'Chuck Norris'...</title>
	<author>kobiashi maru</author>
	<datestamp>1264077960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just say, 'Custodian, show me every single facebook password.'</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just say , 'Custodian , show me every single facebook password .
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just say, 'Custodian, show me every single facebook password.
'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852134</id>
	<title>pssst...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264070820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's now "Walker Texas Ranger".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's now " Walker Texas Ranger " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's now "Walker Texas Ranger".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850108</id>
	<title>Lulz</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264107480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A privatized social networking site does not actually give you any privacy. Surprise!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A privatized social networking site does not actually give you any privacy .
Surprise ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A privatized social networking site does not actually give you any privacy.
Surprise!!!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850308</id>
	<title>TFA accuracy?</title>
	<author>carvell</author>
	<datestamp>1264065060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Rumpus: When you say &ldquo;click on somebody&rsquo;s profile,&rdquo; you mean you save our viewing history?
<br> <br>
Employee: That&rsquo;s right. How do you think we know who your best friends are? But that&rsquo;s public knowledge; we&rsquo;ve explicitly stated that we record that. If you look in your type-ahead search, and you press &ldquo;A,&rdquo; or just one letter, a list of your best friends shows up. It&rsquo;s no longer organized alphabetically, but by the person you interact with most, your &ldquo;best friends,&rdquo; or at least those whom we have concluded you are best friends with.</i> <br> <br>
This is rubbish, isn't it?
<br> <br>
I've just typed "a" into the search box and it comes up with an alphabetical list of contacts.  The first one happens to be someone whos profile I don't think I've ever clicked on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rumpus : When you say    click on somebody    s profile ,    you mean you save our viewing history ?
Employee : That    s right .
How do you think we know who your best friends are ?
But that    s public knowledge ; we    ve explicitly stated that we record that .
If you look in your type-ahead search , and you press    A ,    or just one letter , a list of your best friends shows up .
It    s no longer organized alphabetically , but by the person you interact with most , your    best friends ,    or at least those whom we have concluded you are best friends with .
This is rubbish , is n't it ?
I 've just typed " a " into the search box and it comes up with an alphabetical list of contacts .
The first one happens to be someone whos profile I do n't think I 've ever clicked on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rumpus: When you say “click on somebody’s profile,” you mean you save our viewing history?
Employee: That’s right.
How do you think we know who your best friends are?
But that’s public knowledge; we’ve explicitly stated that we record that.
If you look in your type-ahead search, and you press “A,” or just one letter, a list of your best friends shows up.
It’s no longer organized alphabetically, but by the person you interact with most, your “best friends,” or at least those whom we have concluded you are best friends with.
This is rubbish, isn't it?
I've just typed "a" into the search box and it comes up with an alphabetical list of contacts.
The first one happens to be someone whos profile I don't think I've ever clicked on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855436</id>
	<title>What support?</title>
	<author>SuperBanana</author>
	<datestamp>1264086840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>It's pretty normal for support personnel to have access to production systems in order to provide support.</i>

</p><p>On Facebook?  What support?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's pretty normal for support personnel to have access to production systems in order to provide support .
On Facebook ?
What support ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It's pretty normal for support personnel to have access to production systems in order to provide support.
On Facebook?
What support?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853874</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>turbotroll</author>
	<datestamp>1264076820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Your making one large assumption there, that face book is more important than a teenagers first website.</p><p>Just because it has millions of users doesn't make it important, that site is essentially a recording of all the teenage girl conversations on the planet...aka, the most worthless data ever.</p></div><p>In other words, Facebook is just another landfill of the Internet, not unlike Geocities were a decade ago.  Once all the hype surrounding it disappears, it will slowly slide into irrelevance and eventually completely disappear.  The history will once again repeat itself.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your making one large assumption there , that face book is more important than a teenagers first website.Just because it has millions of users does n't make it important , that site is essentially a recording of all the teenage girl conversations on the planet...aka , the most worthless data ever.In other words , Facebook is just another landfill of the Internet , not unlike Geocities were a decade ago .
Once all the hype surrounding it disappears , it will slowly slide into irrelevance and eventually completely disappear .
The history will once again repeat itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your making one large assumption there, that face book is more important than a teenagers first website.Just because it has millions of users doesn't make it important, that site is essentially a recording of all the teenage girl conversations on the planet...aka, the most worthless data ever.In other words, Facebook is just another landfill of the Internet, not unlike Geocities were a decade ago.
Once all the hype surrounding it disappears, it will slowly slide into irrelevance and eventually completely disappear.
The history will once again repeat itself.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850330</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264065120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>There's funny, and then there's irresponsible. Having "Chuck Norris" as a master password that grants access to any account is most definitely the latter. I would expect that from a couple of teenagers running their first web server, not one of the most popular websites on the Internet.</i>

But Facebook WAS a couple of teenagers running a web server (He was 19 when FB launched)... and it grew.

Not that I don't disagree with it being irresponsible, I'm just saying...</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's funny , and then there 's irresponsible .
Having " Chuck Norris " as a master password that grants access to any account is most definitely the latter .
I would expect that from a couple of teenagers running their first web server , not one of the most popular websites on the Internet .
But Facebook WAS a couple of teenagers running a web server ( He was 19 when FB launched ) ... and it grew .
Not that I do n't disagree with it being irresponsible , I 'm just saying.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's funny, and then there's irresponsible.
Having "Chuck Norris" as a master password that grants access to any account is most definitely the latter.
I would expect that from a couple of teenagers running their first web server, not one of the most popular websites on the Internet.
But Facebook WAS a couple of teenagers running a web server (He was 19 when FB launched)... and it grew.
Not that I don't disagree with it being irresponsible, I'm just saying...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853038</id>
	<title>Re:TFA accuracy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264073760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The tone of the entire article seemed a bit off to me.  It just didn't seem like a software engineer to me.  The discussion about "hyper PHP" was especially ridiculous.</p><p>Also, the comment about Harvard and Stanford.  Yes, I'm sure a large number of Facebook people come from there.  But I don't have an Ivy League education and I've heard from their headhunters twice in the last six months.  My friends in the industry have told me similar.  I think they are hiring from everywhere at this point.</p><p>Lastly...  She's given the interviewer an awful lot of personally identifiable information.  If she wanted to keep her job, she wouldn't do this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The tone of the entire article seemed a bit off to me .
It just did n't seem like a software engineer to me .
The discussion about " hyper PHP " was especially ridiculous.Also , the comment about Harvard and Stanford .
Yes , I 'm sure a large number of Facebook people come from there .
But I do n't have an Ivy League education and I 've heard from their headhunters twice in the last six months .
My friends in the industry have told me similar .
I think they are hiring from everywhere at this point.Lastly... She 's given the interviewer an awful lot of personally identifiable information .
If she wanted to keep her job , she would n't do this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The tone of the entire article seemed a bit off to me.
It just didn't seem like a software engineer to me.
The discussion about "hyper PHP" was especially ridiculous.Also, the comment about Harvard and Stanford.
Yes, I'm sure a large number of Facebook people come from there.
But I don't have an Ivy League education and I've heard from their headhunters twice in the last six months.
My friends in the industry have told me similar.
I think they are hiring from everywhere at this point.Lastly...  She's given the interviewer an awful lot of personally identifiable information.
If she wanted to keep her job, she wouldn't do this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851108</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264067760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Inquiry, how do you know this? You from facebook?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Inquiry , how do you know this ?
You from facebook ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Inquiry, how do you know this?
You from facebook?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850736</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris Jokes</title>
	<author>Gizzmonic</author>
	<datestamp>1264066680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2004 called, it wants its meme back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2004 called , it wants its meme back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2004 called, it wants its meme back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30952472</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264792020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The default password only worked from the Facebook office on the Facebook ISP.</p></div><p>Hey, 3 questions: please:<br>What are you trying to say?<br>That all anyone need to do is exploit one of their office machines remotely?<br>With the knowledge of 0-day exploit sites, how many twelve year olds do you think could do it?</p><p>This is my first post here. "Anonymous Coward"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The default password only worked from the Facebook office on the Facebook ISP.Hey , 3 questions : please : What are you trying to say ? That all anyone need to do is exploit one of their office machines remotely ? With the knowledge of 0-day exploit sites , how many twelve year olds do you think could do it ? This is my first post here .
" Anonymous Coward "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The default password only worked from the Facebook office on the Facebook ISP.Hey, 3 questions: please:What are you trying to say?That all anyone need to do is exploit one of their office machines remotely?With the knowledge of 0-day exploit sites, how many twelve year olds do you think could do it?This is my first post here.
"Anonymous Coward"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850166</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>Zarf</author>
	<datestamp>1264064580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chuck Norris doesn't need a password, he just round-house kicks the keyboard into submission.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chuck Norris does n't need a password , he just round-house kicks the keyboard into submission .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chuck Norris doesn't need a password, he just round-house kicks the keyboard into submission.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850526</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264065840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Still uses more letters than fred which was the most common password among IT types in the 70s 80s and 90s.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Still uses more letters than fred which was the most common password among IT types in the 70s 80s and 90s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still uses more letters than fred which was the most common password among IT types in the 70s 80s and 90s.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850452</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>kevinNCSU</author>
	<datestamp>1264065540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's probably worth noting that it could only be used from Facebook's internal network.  Not that it wasn't still a risk to privacy, but not quite as bad as it sounds at first pass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably worth noting that it could only be used from Facebook 's internal network .
Not that it was n't still a risk to privacy , but not quite as bad as it sounds at first pass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably worth noting that it could only be used from Facebook's internal network.
Not that it wasn't still a risk to privacy, but not quite as bad as it sounds at first pass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851042</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264067640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, Chuck Norris is the password.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , Chuck Norris is the password .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, Chuck Norris is the password.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855226</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>rubi</author>
	<datestamp>1264084920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Chuck Norris <b>IS</b> facebook!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chuck Norris IS facebook !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chuck Norris IS facebook!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850660</id>
	<title>At least the don't call the Master account</title>
	<author>wiredog</author>
	<datestamp>1264066440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>something lame like "root".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>something lame like " root " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>something lame like "root".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852994</id>
	<title>White Goodman</title>
	<author>pckl300</author>
	<datestamp>1264073580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fuckin Chuck Norris...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuckin Chuck Norris.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuckin Chuck Norris...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850614</id>
	<title>Re:The very idea of a "master password" seems scar</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1264066200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Read the article. They replaced it with a system where developers click a widget and fill in the justification for the access.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Read the article .
They replaced it with a system where developers click a widget and fill in the justification for the access .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read the article.
They replaced it with a system where developers click a widget and fill in the justification for the access.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132</id>
	<title>Not the master password</title>
	<author>DoofusOfDeath</author>
	<datestamp>1264064400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not Facebook's fault: it's not like they actually set the master password to "Chuck Norris".</p><p>The real WTF is that "Chuck Norris" works as a password into <i>anything</i>: Facebook, your online bank account, your sister's pants...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not Facebook 's fault : it 's not like they actually set the master password to " Chuck Norris " .The real WTF is that " Chuck Norris " works as a password into anything : Facebook , your online bank account , your sister 's pants.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not Facebook's fault: it's not like they actually set the master password to "Chuck Norris".The real WTF is that "Chuck Norris" works as a password into anything: Facebook, your online bank account, your sister's pants...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30859480</id>
	<title>Would I dare to ask ?</title>
	<author>freaker\_TuC</author>
	<datestamp>1264176240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What does Chuck has more that we don't have ?</p><p>Don't tell me "Karma" because I'm having plenty of that left.. It must be something else! Something biometric<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</p><p>oh probably Chuck Norris doesn't need biometrics to enter something<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</p><p>I'm sleeptyping again!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What does Chuck has more that we do n't have ? Do n't tell me " Karma " because I 'm having plenty of that left.. It must be something else !
Something biometric ..oh probably Chuck Norris does n't need biometrics to enter something ..I 'm sleeptyping again !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does Chuck has more that we don't have ?Don't tell me "Karma" because I'm having plenty of that left.. It must be something else!
Something biometric ..oh probably Chuck Norris doesn't need biometrics to enter something ..I'm sleeptyping again!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30859334</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1264175460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes. Luckily, the fist hidden behind his beard can crack it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
Luckily , the fist hidden behind his beard can crack it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
Luckily, the fist hidden behind his beard can crack it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851542</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855382</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1264086240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>But Facebook WAS a couple of teenagers running a web server (He was 19 when FB launched)</p></div></blockquote><p>

In most countries, 18 is when you can vote, join the army, go to jail and drink like an adult.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But Facebook WAS a couple of teenagers running a web server ( He was 19 when FB launched ) In most countries , 18 is when you can vote , join the army , go to jail and drink like an adult .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But Facebook WAS a couple of teenagers running a web server (He was 19 when FB launched)

In most countries, 18 is when you can vote, join the army, go to jail and drink like an adult.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850362</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264065240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure it was only accessible within their own network and not publicly accessible to the outside world and it was used for debugging and such. Now they can just hit a button to login as if they were anyone on the system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure it was only accessible within their own network and not publicly accessible to the outside world and it was used for debugging and such .
Now they can just hit a button to login as if they were anyone on the system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure it was only accessible within their own network and not publicly accessible to the outside world and it was used for debugging and such.
Now they can just hit a button to login as if they were anyone on the system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851926</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Pollardito</author>
	<datestamp>1264070160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it was also not literally "Chuck Norris":<p><div class="quote"><p>I&rsquo;m not going to give you the exact password, but with upper and lower case, symbols, numbers, all of the above, it spelled out &lsquo;Chuck Norris,&rsquo; more or less. It was pretty fantastic.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>it was also not literally " Chuck Norris " : I    m not going to give you the exact password , but with upper and lower case , symbols , numbers , all of the above , it spelled out    Chuck Norris ,    more or less .
It was pretty fantastic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it was also not literally "Chuck Norris":I’m not going to give you the exact password, but with upper and lower case, symbols, numbers, all of the above, it spelled out ‘Chuck Norris,’ more or less.
It was pretty fantastic.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853978</id>
	<title>Re:Reason #2378238 not to be on Facebook</title>
	<author>kobiashi maru</author>
	<datestamp>1264077240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>this password only works if you're logged in at Facebook HQ</p></div><p>exactly. it only works on database. otherwise every single one of us slashdotters who saw this article could access every single person's account on facebook...wait a second, i smell world domination coming around the corner<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>this password only works if you 're logged in at Facebook HQexactly .
it only works on database .
otherwise every single one of us slashdotters who saw this article could access every single person 's account on facebook...wait a second , i smell world domination coming around the corner : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this password only works if you're logged in at Facebook HQexactly.
it only works on database.
otherwise every single one of us slashdotters who saw this article could access every single person's account on facebook...wait a second, i smell world domination coming around the corner :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851542</id>
	<title>Re:Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264069020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real question is... Can Chuck Norris create a password SO strong that he, himself, cannot crack it?????</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real question is... Can Chuck Norris create a password SO strong that he , himself , can not crack it ? ? ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real question is... Can Chuck Norris create a password SO strong that he, himself, cannot crack it????
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856084</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264092600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As per the article, it SPELLED OUT to Chuck Norris; it was still a strong alphanumeric, so it was still a good password.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As per the article , it SPELLED OUT to Chuck Norris ; it was still a strong alphanumeric , so it was still a good password .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As per the article, it SPELLED OUT to Chuck Norris; it was still a strong alphanumeric, so it was still a good password.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853476</id>
	<title>Re:There's funny...</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1264075380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's pretty normal for support personnel to have access to production systems in order to provide support.</p></div><p>Indeed.  I have full access to millions of credit card accounts -- but you can bet I don't even think of looking at even my own outside of the context of production support.  It's not worth my job (or my freedom, as could very easily be the case in the financial industry).  This article is an interesting read, but the summary reads as if written by someone who's still out looking for a first job...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's pretty normal for support personnel to have access to production systems in order to provide support.Indeed .
I have full access to millions of credit card accounts -- but you can bet I do n't even think of looking at even my own outside of the context of production support .
It 's not worth my job ( or my freedom , as could very easily be the case in the financial industry ) .
This article is an interesting read , but the summary reads as if written by someone who 's still out looking for a first job.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's pretty normal for support personnel to have access to production systems in order to provide support.Indeed.
I have full access to millions of credit card accounts -- but you can bet I don't even think of looking at even my own outside of the context of production support.
It's not worth my job (or my freedom, as could very easily be the case in the financial industry).
This article is an interesting read, but the summary reads as if written by someone who's still out looking for a first job...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851028</id>
	<title>Re:The very idea of a "master password" seems scar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264067580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, they chose a really obscure washed-up has-been actor whos career has been in the gutter for quite some time: WInona Ryder, I just tried it, still works!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , they chose a really obscure washed-up has-been actor whos career has been in the gutter for quite some time : WInona Ryder , I just tried it , still works !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, they chose a really obscure washed-up has-been actor whos career has been in the gutter for quite some time: WInona Ryder, I just tried it, still works!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30859334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850140
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30858692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30857836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30952472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30858374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30984852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30858028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30858580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30924658
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30859590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30865724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30859480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_179242_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_179242.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850736
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852076
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856628
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_179242.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851126
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852088
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30984852
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_179242.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851798
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_179242.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850428
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851180
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_179242.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850364
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_179242.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852122
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_179242.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30865724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850672
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_179242.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850396
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850402
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851108
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853032
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852314
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855436
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853476
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852384
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850400
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855716
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30858028
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30952472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30859590
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850330
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855382
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850318
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850452
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_179242.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852810
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30858374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30924658
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_179242.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30858580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30857836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850118
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850342
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30854220
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851542
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30859334
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851042
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30856498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850126
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30858692
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30855814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850144
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_179242.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30852730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851004
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30859480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30850240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30851822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_179242.30853082
</commentlist>
</conversation>
