<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_21_1511236</id>
	<title>Asus Says Netbook Is Dead, Hello Wearable Computers</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1264093320000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>pinkgadget27 pointed us at a story where <a href="http://www.silicon.com/technology/hardware/2010/01/21/asus-what-will-be-the-next-netbook-39745351/print/">the ASUS chairman waxes poetic</a> on the end of the Netbook class that it pioneered, ChromeOS replacing Android, and the future you probably didn't know about: Wristwatch Computers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>pinkgadget27 pointed us at a story where the ASUS chairman waxes poetic on the end of the Netbook class that it pioneered , ChromeOS replacing Android , and the future you probably did n't know about : Wristwatch Computers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>pinkgadget27 pointed us at a story where the ASUS chairman waxes poetic on the end of the Netbook class that it pioneered, ChromeOS replacing Android, and the future you probably didn't know about: Wristwatch Computers.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848008</id>
	<title>Re:eeh...</title>
	<author>IrquiM</author>
	<datestamp>1264098420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What cracks me up is that everytime somebody says "computer this" and "computer that" everybody is comparing it to a desktop / laptop.</p><p>It's not going to be something you have instead of your computer at the office, or your gaming rig at home.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What cracks me up is that everytime somebody says " computer this " and " computer that " everybody is comparing it to a desktop / laptop.It 's not going to be something you have instead of your computer at the office , or your gaming rig at home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What cracks me up is that everytime somebody says "computer this" and "computer that" everybody is comparing it to a desktop / laptop.It's not going to be something you have instead of your computer at the office, or your gaming rig at home.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</id>
	<title>Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>captaindomon</author>
	<datestamp>1264097040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, because we all know how easy it is to use a 1"x1" oval viewing screen strapped to your wrist, to view large PDF attachments, for example.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , because we all know how easy it is to use a 1 " x1 " oval viewing screen strapped to your wrist , to view large PDF attachments , for example .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, because we all know how easy it is to use a 1"x1" oval viewing screen strapped to your wrist, to view large PDF attachments, for example.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848710</id>
	<title>"Probably didn't know this?"</title>
	<author>dilemmachine</author>
	<datestamp>1264101360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder what percentage of slashdot readers
*actually* didn't know about wearable computers.
Probably less than 20\%.  The means of taking
a gumstix, attaching a bluetooth twiddler, and a
kopin eyepiece and looking like one of the Borg
is pretty widespread knowledge.  Or just mounting a smartphone on your waist and using it with a bluetooth keyboard and an audial interface.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what percentage of slashdot readers * actually * did n't know about wearable computers .
Probably less than 20 \ % .
The means of taking a gumstix , attaching a bluetooth twiddler , and a kopin eyepiece and looking like one of the Borg is pretty widespread knowledge .
Or just mounting a smartphone on your waist and using it with a bluetooth keyboard and an audial interface .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder what percentage of slashdot readers
*actually* didn't know about wearable computers.
Probably less than 20\%.
The means of taking
a gumstix, attaching a bluetooth twiddler, and a
kopin eyepiece and looking like one of the Borg
is pretty widespread knowledge.
Or just mounting a smartphone on your waist and using it with a bluetooth keyboard and an audial interface.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847714</id>
	<title>first2wr</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264097100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>first</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>first</tokentext>
<sentencetext>first</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848346</id>
	<title>History of computing paradigms</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264099800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One thing I've noticed over the many years I've been following the computer industry is that despite what hype marketing departments, CEOs and industry analysts spin, often times new devices don't replace the older devices so much as just augment the array of where you use a computer.  So time has shown that you generally don't have to worry about a mass switch to newer technologies. These dates aren't exact, but its generally when they started showing up in the public eye.</p><p>*<b>Mainframe/Server (1940s-infinity):</b> Untouchable by user, but keeps track of info the user can't, makes sharing easier, etc. This will probably never go away as long as there is a need for reliability and massive storage.<br>*<b>Workstation/Terminal (1950s-1990s):</b> Let's you do stuff in relation to server/mainframe, but only at work.<br>*<b>Desktop personal computer(1977-20??):</b> Let's you try to do stuff at home. Can usually keep up with or exceed most innovations in technology. We will probably always have some sort of stationary access point for computing.<br>*<b>Standardized Gaming Consoles (1977-infinity):</b>Makes easier for most people to play games, but have never been realistic for computer-type work. Often goes back and forth between whether computers have better games. And no, this isn't the first time people have said "The end of PC/computer gaming". I think gaming consoles come and go with the cycles of the economy.<br>*<b>Laptop (1980s-2020):</b> Allows you do stuff in previous, but some people still prefer a desktop for power, customization, easy of repair<br>*<b>PDA/iPhone/Droid (1993-24th century):</b> More convenient than a laptop, but generally only used for organization type stuff, still need laptop or desktop for most things. Actually, if you look at Star Trek, you'll notice that they don't really have a one-device-does-it-all thing either.<br>*<b>Tablet PC(1995-death of HP):</b> More convenient than a laptop, but probably not as rugged. Only useful in some situations. Annoying when the touch display stops working. Will probably never catch on.<br>*<b>Notebook computer (2007-?):</b> Can put it in your purse and hold it like the bible, but good luck reading a document, doing anything useful. My wife uses hers to play Netflix movies while she uses her fullsize laptop.<br>*<b>Wristwatch computer:</b> Makes it a little easier to have fast access all the time to stuff a PDA would do for you. But you still need laptop or desktop.</p><p>So here we are in 2010, and all of these computing access paradigms still exist. None of them have replaced the previous paradigm even close to as much as they claimed they would. The only think I could think might replace the desktop/laptop paradigm is if headset computing comes along and allows you to see a virtual large display and you can think what you want to do and it will happen reliably.  But we still have a ways and people will need to get used to that.  Some people won't want to mess up their hair and what about when you need to drive, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One thing I 've noticed over the many years I 've been following the computer industry is that despite what hype marketing departments , CEOs and industry analysts spin , often times new devices do n't replace the older devices so much as just augment the array of where you use a computer .
So time has shown that you generally do n't have to worry about a mass switch to newer technologies .
These dates are n't exact , but its generally when they started showing up in the public eye .
* Mainframe/Server ( 1940s-infinity ) : Untouchable by user , but keeps track of info the user ca n't , makes sharing easier , etc .
This will probably never go away as long as there is a need for reliability and massive storage .
* Workstation/Terminal ( 1950s-1990s ) : Let 's you do stuff in relation to server/mainframe , but only at work .
* Desktop personal computer ( 1977-20 ? ?
) : Let 's you try to do stuff at home .
Can usually keep up with or exceed most innovations in technology .
We will probably always have some sort of stationary access point for computing .
* Standardized Gaming Consoles ( 1977-infinity ) : Makes easier for most people to play games , but have never been realistic for computer-type work .
Often goes back and forth between whether computers have better games .
And no , this is n't the first time people have said " The end of PC/computer gaming " .
I think gaming consoles come and go with the cycles of the economy .
* Laptop ( 1980s-2020 ) : Allows you do stuff in previous , but some people still prefer a desktop for power , customization , easy of repair * PDA/iPhone/Droid ( 1993-24th century ) : More convenient than a laptop , but generally only used for organization type stuff , still need laptop or desktop for most things .
Actually , if you look at Star Trek , you 'll notice that they do n't really have a one-device-does-it-all thing either .
* Tablet PC ( 1995-death of HP ) : More convenient than a laptop , but probably not as rugged .
Only useful in some situations .
Annoying when the touch display stops working .
Will probably never catch on .
* Notebook computer ( 2007- ?
) : Can put it in your purse and hold it like the bible , but good luck reading a document , doing anything useful .
My wife uses hers to play Netflix movies while she uses her fullsize laptop .
* Wristwatch computer : Makes it a little easier to have fast access all the time to stuff a PDA would do for you .
But you still need laptop or desktop.So here we are in 2010 , and all of these computing access paradigms still exist .
None of them have replaced the previous paradigm even close to as much as they claimed they would .
The only think I could think might replace the desktop/laptop paradigm is if headset computing comes along and allows you to see a virtual large display and you can think what you want to do and it will happen reliably .
But we still have a ways and people will need to get used to that .
Some people wo n't want to mess up their hair and what about when you need to drive , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One thing I've noticed over the many years I've been following the computer industry is that despite what hype marketing departments, CEOs and industry analysts spin, often times new devices don't replace the older devices so much as just augment the array of where you use a computer.
So time has shown that you generally don't have to worry about a mass switch to newer technologies.
These dates aren't exact, but its generally when they started showing up in the public eye.
*Mainframe/Server (1940s-infinity): Untouchable by user, but keeps track of info the user can't, makes sharing easier, etc.
This will probably never go away as long as there is a need for reliability and massive storage.
*Workstation/Terminal (1950s-1990s): Let's you do stuff in relation to server/mainframe, but only at work.
*Desktop personal computer(1977-20??
): Let's you try to do stuff at home.
Can usually keep up with or exceed most innovations in technology.
We will probably always have some sort of stationary access point for computing.
*Standardized Gaming Consoles (1977-infinity):Makes easier for most people to play games, but have never been realistic for computer-type work.
Often goes back and forth between whether computers have better games.
And no, this isn't the first time people have said "The end of PC/computer gaming".
I think gaming consoles come and go with the cycles of the economy.
*Laptop (1980s-2020): Allows you do stuff in previous, but some people still prefer a desktop for power, customization, easy of repair*PDA/iPhone/Droid (1993-24th century): More convenient than a laptop, but generally only used for organization type stuff, still need laptop or desktop for most things.
Actually, if you look at Star Trek, you'll notice that they don't really have a one-device-does-it-all thing either.
*Tablet PC(1995-death of HP): More convenient than a laptop, but probably not as rugged.
Only useful in some situations.
Annoying when the touch display stops working.
Will probably never catch on.
*Notebook computer (2007-?
): Can put it in your purse and hold it like the bible, but good luck reading a document, doing anything useful.
My wife uses hers to play Netflix movies while she uses her fullsize laptop.
*Wristwatch computer: Makes it a little easier to have fast access all the time to stuff a PDA would do for you.
But you still need laptop or desktop.So here we are in 2010, and all of these computing access paradigms still exist.
None of them have replaced the previous paradigm even close to as much as they claimed they would.
The only think I could think might replace the desktop/laptop paradigm is if headset computing comes along and allows you to see a virtual large display and you can think what you want to do and it will happen reliably.
But we still have a ways and people will need to get used to that.
Some people won't want to mess up their hair and what about when you need to drive, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849372</id>
	<title>As /. showed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264104480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bill Gates has been modelling this feature for years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bill Gates has been modelling this feature for years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bill Gates has been modelling this feature for years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30857774</id>
	<title>env3</title>
	<author>TM22721</author>
	<datestamp>1264159680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eyeglass semitransparent displays are already available and attach the env3 cellphone on your wrist with velcro problem solved</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eyeglass semitransparent displays are already available and attach the env3 cellphone on your wrist with velcro problem solved</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eyeglass semitransparent displays are already available and attach the env3 cellphone on your wrist with velcro problem solved</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847802</id>
	<title>Wristwatch computers? Already have that.</title>
	<author>GreatBunzinni</author>
	<datestamp>1264097460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We already have wristwatch computers for decades.  That's what electronic wristwatches are, those that Casio has been pumping by the barrel since the the 80s, such as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casio\_DW-5600C" title="wikipedia.org">this one</a> [wikipedia.org].  Naturally, nowadays we have more computing power available in a smaller form factor but that doesn't mean that we haven't been wearing computers for ages.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We already have wristwatch computers for decades .
That 's what electronic wristwatches are , those that Casio has been pumping by the barrel since the the 80s , such as this one [ wikipedia.org ] .
Naturally , nowadays we have more computing power available in a smaller form factor but that does n't mean that we have n't been wearing computers for ages .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We already have wristwatch computers for decades.
That's what electronic wristwatches are, those that Casio has been pumping by the barrel since the the 80s, such as this one [wikipedia.org].
Naturally, nowadays we have more computing power available in a smaller form factor but that doesn't mean that we haven't been wearing computers for ages.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849132</id>
	<title>Re:They are so desperate to shake off the netbook.</title>
	<author>Nethemas the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1264103400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because having a large square shaped bulge in your pocket isn't dorky looking...  Besides how many times have you or someone you know dropped that device into the toilet, onto concrete, etc. or accidentally left it somewhere?  A wristband makes a lot of sense for a communication device.  For instances where you need to have larger display real estate it is entirely conceivable that it could have a built in projector.  They're already getting <a href="http://www.infosyncworld.com/reviews/cell-phones/logic-wireless-logic-bolt/" title="infosyncworld.com">small enough</a> [infosyncworld.com].  The over sized, entire front is a display, pocket bricks didn't solve the real-estate problem.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because having a large square shaped bulge in your pocket is n't dorky looking... Besides how many times have you or someone you know dropped that device into the toilet , onto concrete , etc .
or accidentally left it somewhere ?
A wristband makes a lot of sense for a communication device .
For instances where you need to have larger display real estate it is entirely conceivable that it could have a built in projector .
They 're already getting small enough [ infosyncworld.com ] .
The over sized , entire front is a display , pocket bricks did n't solve the real-estate problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because having a large square shaped bulge in your pocket isn't dorky looking...  Besides how many times have you or someone you know dropped that device into the toilet, onto concrete, etc.
or accidentally left it somewhere?
A wristband makes a lot of sense for a communication device.
For instances where you need to have larger display real estate it is entirely conceivable that it could have a built in projector.
They're already getting small enough [infosyncworld.com].
The over sized, entire front is a display, pocket bricks didn't solve the real-estate problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848572</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>HiThere</author>
	<datestamp>1264100700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What you do is, you wear glasses that display the screen across your entire visual field, and you connect them to the computer with Bluetooth.</p><p>Why not?  The glasses have already been built.  (At least one design of them has.)  And it might make for a *REALLY* interesting driving experience.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What you do is , you wear glasses that display the screen across your entire visual field , and you connect them to the computer with Bluetooth.Why not ?
The glasses have already been built .
( At least one design of them has .
) And it might make for a * REALLY * interesting driving experience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What you do is, you wear glasses that display the screen across your entire visual field, and you connect them to the computer with Bluetooth.Why not?
The glasses have already been built.
(At least one design of them has.
)  And it might make for a *REALLY* interesting driving experience.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30856528</id>
	<title>Re:Wait there pardner</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1264097400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>But don't hold your breath.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Yeah, the Asus EeeRebreather costs an arm and a leg.<br> <br>

The arm and leg modules can also be purchased for the low low cost of just one kidney.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But do n't hold your breath .
Yeah , the Asus EeeRebreather costs an arm and a leg .
The arm and leg modules can also be purchased for the low low cost of just one kidney .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But don't hold your breath.
Yeah, the Asus EeeRebreather costs an arm and a leg.
The arm and leg modules can also be purchased for the low low cost of just one kidney.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849280</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1264104120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The real problem is Copyright Law and DRM."</p><p>Well, and that little problem of actually interfacing directly with the brain, input and output, reliably and safely.  Have you noticed how the examples you cited are (a) very limited and (b) only used to try to restore some semblance of normal function?  That's because they're too dangerous to use in normal people (hey, if you screw up a blind guy's retina while you're putting in an implant, who cares?).</p><p>There are a LOT of technical problems to overcome before you're even at the point where DRM et al is even a potential concern.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The real problem is Copyright Law and DRM .
" Well , and that little problem of actually interfacing directly with the brain , input and output , reliably and safely .
Have you noticed how the examples you cited are ( a ) very limited and ( b ) only used to try to restore some semblance of normal function ?
That 's because they 're too dangerous to use in normal people ( hey , if you screw up a blind guy 's retina while you 're putting in an implant , who cares ?
) .There are a LOT of technical problems to overcome before you 're even at the point where DRM et al is even a potential concern .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The real problem is Copyright Law and DRM.
"Well, and that little problem of actually interfacing directly with the brain, input and output, reliably and safely.
Have you noticed how the examples you cited are (a) very limited and (b) only used to try to restore some semblance of normal function?
That's because they're too dangerous to use in normal people (hey, if you screw up a blind guy's retina while you're putting in an implant, who cares?
).There are a LOT of technical problems to overcome before you're even at the point where DRM et al is even a potential concern.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848608</id>
	<title>Computers are dead</title>
	<author>bluefoxlucid</author>
	<datestamp>1264100940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm waiting to hear that computers are dead.  Just a long-running fad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting to hear that computers are dead .
Just a long-running fad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting to hear that computers are dead.
Just a long-running fad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847950</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1264098120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh come on!  Didn't you ever have a friend who wore one of those wristwatch calculators?  Weren't you amazed by how quickly and easily they could calculate tips or do other feats of mathematical prowess in mere decaseconds by poking at the tiny, tiny buttons?</p><p>This would be just like that, but with applications that fit even worse onto a miniscule one-handed interface!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh come on !
Did n't you ever have a friend who wore one of those wristwatch calculators ?
Were n't you amazed by how quickly and easily they could calculate tips or do other feats of mathematical prowess in mere decaseconds by poking at the tiny , tiny buttons ? This would be just like that , but with applications that fit even worse onto a miniscule one-handed interface !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh come on!
Didn't you ever have a friend who wore one of those wristwatch calculators?
Weren't you amazed by how quickly and easily they could calculate tips or do other feats of mathematical prowess in mere decaseconds by poking at the tiny, tiny buttons?This would be just like that, but with applications that fit even worse onto a miniscule one-handed interface!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848102</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>kaen</author>
	<datestamp>1264098840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it would be better, as you could use all the digits on one hand, rather then just your two thumbs. It might take a little getting used to though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it would be better , as you could use all the digits on one hand , rather then just your two thumbs .
It might take a little getting used to though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it would be better, as you could use all the digits on one hand, rather then just your two thumbs.
It might take a little getting used to though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850534</id>
	<title>It will be a phone, glasses w/HUD &amp; finger inp</title>
	<author>atrimtab</author>
	<datestamp>1264065840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wearable computers will initially need you to also wear extra batteries. Clothing will change to support the batteries.</p><p>The visual interface will be a HUD like display via glasses that overlay the real world in front of you. Initially, there will be text input based on your finger movement. Subtle body movements like gestures will provide other inputs. There will also be voice recognition commands whose interpretation will occur in the cloud rather than locally in your phone due to power limitations. In fact, many requests will occur in the cloud with the results presented in the HUD or on the screen. When you go from place to place you'll be able to plug your phone into a standard interface to use other peripherals and transfer data.</p><p>Companies providing the technology will get their revenue from ads and charging you for long range wireless access, but WiFi will also be work.</p><p>There will laws against driving while wearing your computer.</p><p>The tech for all this exists right now at about the level of the Apple Newton is compared to the iPhone of today. It's all there. It just needs to be combined, standardized, refined (a lot) and productized. It's coming. The only question is when it will arrive in a viable form.</p><p>The operating system platform is likely to be open source. Android is a likely grandfather of this kind of operating platform.</p><p>Eventually, after better batteries and more efficient processors and memory this may all become a wrist computer with wireless interfaces to HUD and data input devices. But that will take longer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wearable computers will initially need you to also wear extra batteries .
Clothing will change to support the batteries.The visual interface will be a HUD like display via glasses that overlay the real world in front of you .
Initially , there will be text input based on your finger movement .
Subtle body movements like gestures will provide other inputs .
There will also be voice recognition commands whose interpretation will occur in the cloud rather than locally in your phone due to power limitations .
In fact , many requests will occur in the cloud with the results presented in the HUD or on the screen .
When you go from place to place you 'll be able to plug your phone into a standard interface to use other peripherals and transfer data.Companies providing the technology will get their revenue from ads and charging you for long range wireless access , but WiFi will also be work.There will laws against driving while wearing your computer.The tech for all this exists right now at about the level of the Apple Newton is compared to the iPhone of today .
It 's all there .
It just needs to be combined , standardized , refined ( a lot ) and productized .
It 's coming .
The only question is when it will arrive in a viable form.The operating system platform is likely to be open source .
Android is a likely grandfather of this kind of operating platform.Eventually , after better batteries and more efficient processors and memory this may all become a wrist computer with wireless interfaces to HUD and data input devices .
But that will take longer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wearable computers will initially need you to also wear extra batteries.
Clothing will change to support the batteries.The visual interface will be a HUD like display via glasses that overlay the real world in front of you.
Initially, there will be text input based on your finger movement.
Subtle body movements like gestures will provide other inputs.
There will also be voice recognition commands whose interpretation will occur in the cloud rather than locally in your phone due to power limitations.
In fact, many requests will occur in the cloud with the results presented in the HUD or on the screen.
When you go from place to place you'll be able to plug your phone into a standard interface to use other peripherals and transfer data.Companies providing the technology will get their revenue from ads and charging you for long range wireless access, but WiFi will also be work.There will laws against driving while wearing your computer.The tech for all this exists right now at about the level of the Apple Newton is compared to the iPhone of today.
It's all there.
It just needs to be combined, standardized, refined (a lot) and productized.
It's coming.
The only question is when it will arrive in a viable form.The operating system platform is likely to be open source.
Android is a likely grandfather of this kind of operating platform.Eventually, after better batteries and more efficient processors and memory this may all become a wrist computer with wireless interfaces to HUD and data input devices.
But that will take longer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30851856</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>Lord\_Dweomer</author>
	<datestamp>1264069980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While it may not be feasible to do any sort of heavy viewing on the actual device screen, I can foresee a device in the near future that solves this issue through one of the three following methods (or some combination thereof):

1. Roll-out flexible OLED displays.  They already have them, just not in mainstream consumer items yet.  This makes it possible to store the screen in a compact space and enlarge it when necessary.

2. Micro-projectors. They have them for cellphones already and they are pretty decent and getting even smaller.  Who cares how big your device screen is when you can project a 50" display with great clarity/color/contrast?

3. Wearable monitors.  This is ultimately where we are going.  We have bluetooth earphones for phones, and now that texting is on the rise I'm sure we'll have the visual counterpart any year now that actually gains market traction.  The problems with devices currently on the market are that they are too damned expensive, ugly as sin (sorry, "futuristic"), and don't have a portable/lightweight enough form factor to justify carrying around like a bluetooth earpiece.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While it may not be feasible to do any sort of heavy viewing on the actual device screen , I can foresee a device in the near future that solves this issue through one of the three following methods ( or some combination thereof ) : 1 .
Roll-out flexible OLED displays .
They already have them , just not in mainstream consumer items yet .
This makes it possible to store the screen in a compact space and enlarge it when necessary .
2. Micro-projectors .
They have them for cellphones already and they are pretty decent and getting even smaller .
Who cares how big your device screen is when you can project a 50 " display with great clarity/color/contrast ?
3. Wearable monitors .
This is ultimately where we are going .
We have bluetooth earphones for phones , and now that texting is on the rise I 'm sure we 'll have the visual counterpart any year now that actually gains market traction .
The problems with devices currently on the market are that they are too damned expensive , ugly as sin ( sorry , " futuristic " ) , and do n't have a portable/lightweight enough form factor to justify carrying around like a bluetooth earpiece .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While it may not be feasible to do any sort of heavy viewing on the actual device screen, I can foresee a device in the near future that solves this issue through one of the three following methods (or some combination thereof):

1.
Roll-out flexible OLED displays.
They already have them, just not in mainstream consumer items yet.
This makes it possible to store the screen in a compact space and enlarge it when necessary.
2. Micro-projectors.
They have them for cellphones already and they are pretty decent and getting even smaller.
Who cares how big your device screen is when you can project a 50" display with great clarity/color/contrast?
3. Wearable monitors.
This is ultimately where we are going.
We have bluetooth earphones for phones, and now that texting is on the rise I'm sure we'll have the visual counterpart any year now that actually gains market traction.
The problems with devices currently on the market are that they are too damned expensive, ugly as sin (sorry, "futuristic"), and don't have a portable/lightweight enough form factor to justify carrying around like a bluetooth earpiece.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849390</id>
	<title>Re:Not on my wrist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264104540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then you've already covered the whole time-keeping device need.<br>Some people don't have those things with them while moving around, or want to worry about finding their phone just to see the time, or whatever else the device on the wrist does.<br>So your a unique individual.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then you 've already covered the whole time-keeping device need.Some people do n't have those things with them while moving around , or want to worry about finding their phone just to see the time , or whatever else the device on the wrist does.So your a unique individual .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then you've already covered the whole time-keeping device need.Some people don't have those things with them while moving around, or want to worry about finding their phone just to see the time, or whatever else the device on the wrist does.So your a unique individual.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850554</id>
	<title>Computes have not been getting faster - not really</title>
	<author>maxm</author>
	<datestamp>1264066020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Although we are still somewhat following Moores law, out computers have not become that much faster over the last years.</p><p>They have, however, become smaller and cheaper. So if you extrapolate from that, he is spot on.</p><p>And all we need for really small computers to become really usable is wearable screens. Perhaps even 3D screens.</p><p>The television crowd is currently working on that. When there is enough tv shows on big 3D screens, small 3D eyeglasses will become normal too.</p><p>I mean we will need glasses to watch 3D on 50" screens, so why not skip the 50" screen and just use the glasses only?</p><p>And what would you rather want right now? A faster computer notebook or a wearable one with 3D glasses?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Although we are still somewhat following Moores law , out computers have not become that much faster over the last years.They have , however , become smaller and cheaper .
So if you extrapolate from that , he is spot on.And all we need for really small computers to become really usable is wearable screens .
Perhaps even 3D screens.The television crowd is currently working on that .
When there is enough tv shows on big 3D screens , small 3D eyeglasses will become normal too.I mean we will need glasses to watch 3D on 50 " screens , so why not skip the 50 " screen and just use the glasses only ? And what would you rather want right now ?
A faster computer notebook or a wearable one with 3D glasses ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although we are still somewhat following Moores law, out computers have not become that much faster over the last years.They have, however, become smaller and cheaper.
So if you extrapolate from that, he is spot on.And all we need for really small computers to become really usable is wearable screens.
Perhaps even 3D screens.The television crowd is currently working on that.
When there is enough tv shows on big 3D screens, small 3D eyeglasses will become normal too.I mean we will need glasses to watch 3D on 50" screens, so why not skip the 50" screen and just use the glasses only?And what would you rather want right now?
A faster computer notebook or a wearable one with 3D glasses?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30856298</id>
	<title>Asus dead?</title>
	<author>generalSocial</author>
	<datestamp>1264094820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My barely used ASUS 901 is dead.

It's not netbooks, its ASUS that's the dead one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My barely used ASUS 901 is dead .
It 's not netbooks , its ASUS that 's the dead one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My barely used ASUS 901 is dead.
It's not netbooks, its ASUS that's the dead one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848850</id>
	<title>BS</title>
	<author>Thaelon</author>
	<datestamp>1264102140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The future of portable computing is basically already here.</p><p>Smartphones.</p><p>My iPhone is the first device I'm willing to call a portable computer.  It's fast, fairly capable, and can do a ton of things rather well.  Phone, GPS, pretty decent email even without a keyboard, games, entertainment, ebooks etc.</p><p>It's already replaced my N810 for ebook reading, my calculator, my existing phone, could, with a little more investment, replace my GPS, and even has a compass in the stock, and this thing which tells time.</p><p>That's where the future is, a highly portable, highly capable puck that goes in your pocket.  It won't replace portable computers with qwerty keyboards, at least not for a while yet, but it sure as shit isn't wearable crap.  The future is a smooth brick, not a smooth wristband that you're going to smash into doorknobs and shatter.</p><p>One of the most powerful reasons for this is people don't like carrying around a lot of crap, but want a lot out of what they do carry, the more one can do, the more other things it will replace, but everybody wants at least a phone, so the future is smartphones.  We've already got the Droid, iPhone, and the Nexus One.</p><p>tl;dr:  The future is powerful, versatile, myriad function, smartphone pucks, not wearable devices.   The cool thing is, it's mostly already here.</p><p>Now if only my iPhone could also unlock my car, house doors, and interface with credit card readers on demand, and be an acceptable form of government issued ID I wouldn't have to carry <em>anything else</em> in my pockets, but that's perhaps going a bit too far.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The future of portable computing is basically already here.Smartphones.My iPhone is the first device I 'm willing to call a portable computer .
It 's fast , fairly capable , and can do a ton of things rather well .
Phone , GPS , pretty decent email even without a keyboard , games , entertainment , ebooks etc.It 's already replaced my N810 for ebook reading , my calculator , my existing phone , could , with a little more investment , replace my GPS , and even has a compass in the stock , and this thing which tells time.That 's where the future is , a highly portable , highly capable puck that goes in your pocket .
It wo n't replace portable computers with qwerty keyboards , at least not for a while yet , but it sure as shit is n't wearable crap .
The future is a smooth brick , not a smooth wristband that you 're going to smash into doorknobs and shatter.One of the most powerful reasons for this is people do n't like carrying around a lot of crap , but want a lot out of what they do carry , the more one can do , the more other things it will replace , but everybody wants at least a phone , so the future is smartphones .
We 've already got the Droid , iPhone , and the Nexus One.tl ; dr : The future is powerful , versatile , myriad function , smartphone pucks , not wearable devices .
The cool thing is , it 's mostly already here.Now if only my iPhone could also unlock my car , house doors , and interface with credit card readers on demand , and be an acceptable form of government issued ID I would n't have to carry anything else in my pockets , but that 's perhaps going a bit too far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The future of portable computing is basically already here.Smartphones.My iPhone is the first device I'm willing to call a portable computer.
It's fast, fairly capable, and can do a ton of things rather well.
Phone, GPS, pretty decent email even without a keyboard, games, entertainment, ebooks etc.It's already replaced my N810 for ebook reading, my calculator, my existing phone, could, with a little more investment, replace my GPS, and even has a compass in the stock, and this thing which tells time.That's where the future is, a highly portable, highly capable puck that goes in your pocket.
It won't replace portable computers with qwerty keyboards, at least not for a while yet, but it sure as shit isn't wearable crap.
The future is a smooth brick, not a smooth wristband that you're going to smash into doorknobs and shatter.One of the most powerful reasons for this is people don't like carrying around a lot of crap, but want a lot out of what they do carry, the more one can do, the more other things it will replace, but everybody wants at least a phone, so the future is smartphones.
We've already got the Droid, iPhone, and the Nexus One.tl;dr:  The future is powerful, versatile, myriad function, smartphone pucks, not wearable devices.
The cool thing is, it's mostly already here.Now if only my iPhone could also unlock my car, house doors, and interface with credit card readers on demand, and be an acceptable form of government issued ID I wouldn't have to carry anything else in my pockets, but that's perhaps going a bit too far.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849920</id>
	<title>wearable computer is dead,</title>
	<author>porky\_pig\_jr</author>
	<datestamp>1264106700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hello implantable computer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hello implantable computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hello implantable computer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847830</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264097640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While it wouldn't make PDF viewing much easier, the fictional computer cuff at the bottom of the article had approx 2-3"x 3" viewing area, similar to an iphone or bb storm.  And I know people who read PDFs on those.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While it would n't make PDF viewing much easier , the fictional computer cuff at the bottom of the article had approx 2-3 " x 3 " viewing area , similar to an iphone or bb storm .
And I know people who read PDFs on those .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While it wouldn't make PDF viewing much easier, the fictional computer cuff at the bottom of the article had approx 2-3"x 3" viewing area, similar to an iphone or bb storm.
And I know people who read PDFs on those.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848132</id>
	<title>Long term, yeah, inevitable -- but gradual.</title>
	<author>DdJ</author>
	<datestamp>1264098960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the long run, wearable computing has seemed inevitable to me since about 1994 or 1996.</p><p>What happened in 1994?  That's about when I got my first laptop, which got me used to mobile computing.  I used it to take notes in lectures.  Then in 1996 I bought my first PDA, the Apple Newton MP120.</p><p>And I started to do mobile device software development, and to participate in discussions/forums with other developers.  Other developers including Steve Mann.  Go look him up, right now.  Go ahead, I'll wait.</p><p>So yeah, after about that time period, a future world with ubiquitous wearable computing devices seemed inevitable.  Still does.  But it's not going to be some instantaneous revolution where everything changes.  It's going to be (and in fact already is) gradual.  It's going to involve a variety of small gadgets that can interact with other small gadgets, sometimes just in your own "personal area network" (eg. your wristwatch showing the caller ID for the phone that's ringing in your pocket), sometimes over face-to-face distances (vCard exchange during a sales meeting), and sometimes globally (posting Bejeweled scores to a global leaderboard).  All of those are happening right now, and more will come.</p><p>To some people this was obvious decades ago.  To me it was obvious 16 years ago.  To an awful lot of people it was obvious three years ago.  I guess it's just becoming obvious to ASUS right now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the long run , wearable computing has seemed inevitable to me since about 1994 or 1996.What happened in 1994 ?
That 's about when I got my first laptop , which got me used to mobile computing .
I used it to take notes in lectures .
Then in 1996 I bought my first PDA , the Apple Newton MP120.And I started to do mobile device software development , and to participate in discussions/forums with other developers .
Other developers including Steve Mann .
Go look him up , right now .
Go ahead , I 'll wait.So yeah , after about that time period , a future world with ubiquitous wearable computing devices seemed inevitable .
Still does .
But it 's not going to be some instantaneous revolution where everything changes .
It 's going to be ( and in fact already is ) gradual .
It 's going to involve a variety of small gadgets that can interact with other small gadgets , sometimes just in your own " personal area network " ( eg .
your wristwatch showing the caller ID for the phone that 's ringing in your pocket ) , sometimes over face-to-face distances ( vCard exchange during a sales meeting ) , and sometimes globally ( posting Bejeweled scores to a global leaderboard ) .
All of those are happening right now , and more will come.To some people this was obvious decades ago .
To me it was obvious 16 years ago .
To an awful lot of people it was obvious three years ago .
I guess it 's just becoming obvious to ASUS right now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the long run, wearable computing has seemed inevitable to me since about 1994 or 1996.What happened in 1994?
That's about when I got my first laptop, which got me used to mobile computing.
I used it to take notes in lectures.
Then in 1996 I bought my first PDA, the Apple Newton MP120.And I started to do mobile device software development, and to participate in discussions/forums with other developers.
Other developers including Steve Mann.
Go look him up, right now.
Go ahead, I'll wait.So yeah, after about that time period, a future world with ubiquitous wearable computing devices seemed inevitable.
Still does.
But it's not going to be some instantaneous revolution where everything changes.
It's going to be (and in fact already is) gradual.
It's going to involve a variety of small gadgets that can interact with other small gadgets, sometimes just in your own "personal area network" (eg.
your wristwatch showing the caller ID for the phone that's ringing in your pocket), sometimes over face-to-face distances (vCard exchange during a sales meeting), and sometimes globally (posting Bejeweled scores to a global leaderboard).
All of those are happening right now, and more will come.To some people this was obvious decades ago.
To me it was obvious 16 years ago.
To an awful lot of people it was obvious three years ago.
I guess it's just becoming obvious to ASUS right now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850320</id>
	<title>Re:Point of order....</title>
	<author>Ant P.</author>
	<datestamp>1264065120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Asus is now sticking its head in the sand hoping the avalanche it started will go away, after realising <a href="http://itsbetterwithwindows.com/" title="itsbetterwithwindows.com">backstabbing Xandros with a FUD campaign</a> [itsbetterwithwindows.com] for the sake of getting a few dollars more discount on their XP OEM licenses was only successful in driving customers to other brands.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Asus is now sticking its head in the sand hoping the avalanche it started will go away , after realising backstabbing Xandros with a FUD campaign [ itsbetterwithwindows.com ] for the sake of getting a few dollars more discount on their XP OEM licenses was only successful in driving customers to other brands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Asus is now sticking its head in the sand hoping the avalanche it started will go away, after realising backstabbing Xandros with a FUD campaign [itsbetterwithwindows.com] for the sake of getting a few dollars more discount on their XP OEM licenses was only successful in driving customers to other brands.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30852850</id>
	<title>Re:History of computing paradigms</title>
	<author>lennier</author>
	<datestamp>1264073040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'*Notebook computer (2007-?):"</p><p>Nitpick: It's netbook, not notebook. "Notebook" has been the term for "full sized laptop" since the mid 1990s.</p><p>Since I've got a netbook, I've found that I really enjoy it. The size is just right for carrying in a backpack, and it lets me focus and concentrate on work (reading ebooks and writing) that I wouldn't otherwise get done at my desktop due to distractions. So I don't think it will be going away for me anytime soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>' * Notebook computer ( 2007- ?
) : " Nitpick : It 's netbook , not notebook .
" Notebook " has been the term for " full sized laptop " since the mid 1990s.Since I 've got a netbook , I 've found that I really enjoy it .
The size is just right for carrying in a backpack , and it lets me focus and concentrate on work ( reading ebooks and writing ) that I would n't otherwise get done at my desktop due to distractions .
So I do n't think it will be going away for me anytime soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'*Notebook computer (2007-?
):"Nitpick: It's netbook, not notebook.
"Notebook" has been the term for "full sized laptop" since the mid 1990s.Since I've got a netbook, I've found that I really enjoy it.
The size is just right for carrying in a backpack, and it lets me focus and concentrate on work (reading ebooks and writing) that I wouldn't otherwise get done at my desktop due to distractions.
So I don't think it will be going away for me anytime soon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848568</id>
	<title>Re:This will go the way of the "Smart watch"</title>
	<author>jedidiah</author>
	<datestamp>1264100700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone made a Linux watch once as a novelty...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone made a Linux watch once as a novelty.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone made a Linux watch once as a novelty...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849940</id>
	<title>Obligatory Dilbert</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1264106700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/1998-09-12/" title="dilbert.com">http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/1998-09-12/</a> [dilbert.com] <br>
I hate wearing things on my wrist, which is why I used to have a pocket watch before I got a cell phone.  I might wear Dilbert's invention though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //dilbert.com/strips/comic/1998-09-12/ [ dilbert.com ] I hate wearing things on my wrist , which is why I used to have a pocket watch before I got a cell phone .
I might wear Dilbert 's invention though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/1998-09-12/ [dilbert.com] 
I hate wearing things on my wrist, which is why I used to have a pocket watch before I got a cell phone.
I might wear Dilbert's invention though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850518</id>
	<title>Re:History of computing paradigms</title>
	<author>2obvious4u</author>
	<datestamp>1264065780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Actually, if you look at Star Trek, you'll notice that they don't really have a one-device-does-it-all thing either.</p></div><p>Actually, they did...  The enterprise.  Computer make me a coffee.  Computer make me a sex slave on holo-deck twelve.  The computer was always there for them to interface with vocally at any time and was networked wirelessly with all the little pda devices they had on the ship.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , if you look at Star Trek , you 'll notice that they do n't really have a one-device-does-it-all thing either.Actually , they did... The enterprise .
Computer make me a coffee .
Computer make me a sex slave on holo-deck twelve .
The computer was always there for them to interface with vocally at any time and was networked wirelessly with all the little pda devices they had on the ship .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, if you look at Star Trek, you'll notice that they don't really have a one-device-does-it-all thing either.Actually, they did...  The enterprise.
Computer make me a coffee.
Computer make me a sex slave on holo-deck twelve.
The computer was always there for them to interface with vocally at any time and was networked wirelessly with all the little pda devices they had on the ship.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849262</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1264104000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Have you ever tried typing/texting with a single hand? Its not as intuitive as two thumbs or a full fledged keyboard with 10 fingers.</p></div><p>The article says the devices will probably have touch, voice, and gesture recognition. I have used the iphone's on screen (touch) keyboard before, it's not fast but it is intuitive. I've also used speech to text before; many of the speech to text applications are quite good these days. They are faster than typing though you often end up with what looks to be a poorly spell checked document (turn write by the top sign). I've not seen reasonable gesture sensitive typing, but maybe in five years.</p><p>Also, my last phone used predictive text so I could send texts with one thumb, with pretty good speed.</p><p>I don't think the keyboard barrier will be an issue here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you ever tried typing/texting with a single hand ?
Its not as intuitive as two thumbs or a full fledged keyboard with 10 fingers.The article says the devices will probably have touch , voice , and gesture recognition .
I have used the iphone 's on screen ( touch ) keyboard before , it 's not fast but it is intuitive .
I 've also used speech to text before ; many of the speech to text applications are quite good these days .
They are faster than typing though you often end up with what looks to be a poorly spell checked document ( turn write by the top sign ) .
I 've not seen reasonable gesture sensitive typing , but maybe in five years.Also , my last phone used predictive text so I could send texts with one thumb , with pretty good speed.I do n't think the keyboard barrier will be an issue here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you ever tried typing/texting with a single hand?
Its not as intuitive as two thumbs or a full fledged keyboard with 10 fingers.The article says the devices will probably have touch, voice, and gesture recognition.
I have used the iphone's on screen (touch) keyboard before, it's not fast but it is intuitive.
I've also used speech to text before; many of the speech to text applications are quite good these days.
They are faster than typing though you often end up with what looks to be a poorly spell checked document (turn write by the top sign).
I've not seen reasonable gesture sensitive typing, but maybe in five years.Also, my last phone used predictive text so I could send texts with one thumb, with pretty good speed.I don't think the keyboard barrier will be an issue here.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848722</id>
	<title>wristwatch computers...</title>
	<author>roc97007</author>
	<datestamp>1264101480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Wristwatch computers... Geeze...  Unless they've developed the telepathic interface, I don't see this going any further than the last hundred or so times someone's tried it.  Even at high resolution, the screen on a wristwatch is too small for much more than alerts and headlines.
</p><p>
This illustrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the netbook niche.  It's not the computing power.  You can build more resources into a phone if you want to pay enough.  It's having a large enough screen to get work done in a small enough package to always have with you, with cellphone-grade battery life.  It's the ability to research the net without having to squint at a 3" diagonal cell phone screen.  It is *not* the ability to play Halo 3 at high res for a half hour until the battery is exhausted.  There are other platforms for that.  It is *not* having the smallest computer on the block.  Smart phones already have that niche.  And first and foremost, netbooks are not a high end device.
</p><p>
Making the netbook larger defeats the portability requirement.  Making it more powerful usually defeats the battery life requirement.  Making it smaller defeats the readability requirement.  But there's no margin in small cheap computers, so the vendors are always looking for some new way to print money.  They don't get it, on a fundamental level.  Netbooks are a commodity item, and because of the requirements, the niche can not be taken over by a high margin item.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wristwatch computers... Geeze... Unless they 've developed the telepathic interface , I do n't see this going any further than the last hundred or so times someone 's tried it .
Even at high resolution , the screen on a wristwatch is too small for much more than alerts and headlines .
This illustrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the netbook niche .
It 's not the computing power .
You can build more resources into a phone if you want to pay enough .
It 's having a large enough screen to get work done in a small enough package to always have with you , with cellphone-grade battery life .
It 's the ability to research the net without having to squint at a 3 " diagonal cell phone screen .
It is * not * the ability to play Halo 3 at high res for a half hour until the battery is exhausted .
There are other platforms for that .
It is * not * having the smallest computer on the block .
Smart phones already have that niche .
And first and foremost , netbooks are not a high end device .
Making the netbook larger defeats the portability requirement .
Making it more powerful usually defeats the battery life requirement .
Making it smaller defeats the readability requirement .
But there 's no margin in small cheap computers , so the vendors are always looking for some new way to print money .
They do n't get it , on a fundamental level .
Netbooks are a commodity item , and because of the requirements , the niche can not be taken over by a high margin item .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Wristwatch computers... Geeze...  Unless they've developed the telepathic interface, I don't see this going any further than the last hundred or so times someone's tried it.
Even at high resolution, the screen on a wristwatch is too small for much more than alerts and headlines.
This illustrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the netbook niche.
It's not the computing power.
You can build more resources into a phone if you want to pay enough.
It's having a large enough screen to get work done in a small enough package to always have with you, with cellphone-grade battery life.
It's the ability to research the net without having to squint at a 3" diagonal cell phone screen.
It is *not* the ability to play Halo 3 at high res for a half hour until the battery is exhausted.
There are other platforms for that.
It is *not* having the smallest computer on the block.
Smart phones already have that niche.
And first and foremost, netbooks are not a high end device.
Making the netbook larger defeats the portability requirement.
Making it more powerful usually defeats the battery life requirement.
Making it smaller defeats the readability requirement.
But there's no margin in small cheap computers, so the vendors are always looking for some new way to print money.
They don't get it, on a fundamental level.
Netbooks are a commodity item, and because of the requirements, the niche can not be taken over by a high margin item.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848232</id>
	<title>Goggle/Visors are the future, not watches</title>
	<author>EmpireOfLight</author>
	<datestamp>1264099260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As I've made perfectly clear in this her sketch 'o mine from 2008:
<a href="http://fieldii.com/vgcomputing.png" title="fieldii.com" rel="nofollow">http://fieldii.com/vgcomputing.png</a> [fieldii.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>As I 've made perfectly clear in this her sketch 'o mine from 2008 : http : //fieldii.com/vgcomputing.png [ fieldii.com ] : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I've made perfectly clear in this her sketch 'o mine from 2008:
http://fieldii.com/vgcomputing.png [fieldii.com] :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849202</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1264103700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would you want to wear your data uplink on your wrist?  I keep mine in my pocket.  It's called a smart phone.  That way it's less likely to get broken, doesn't advertise itself as something worth stealing, and I don't have a big clunky thing on my wrist.</p><p>A watch computer is a non-solution looking for a problem.  The form factor just isn't useful for much other than telling the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would you want to wear your data uplink on your wrist ?
I keep mine in my pocket .
It 's called a smart phone .
That way it 's less likely to get broken , does n't advertise itself as something worth stealing , and I do n't have a big clunky thing on my wrist.A watch computer is a non-solution looking for a problem .
The form factor just is n't useful for much other than telling the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would you want to wear your data uplink on your wrist?
I keep mine in my pocket.
It's called a smart phone.
That way it's less likely to get broken, doesn't advertise itself as something worth stealing, and I don't have a big clunky thing on my wrist.A watch computer is a non-solution looking for a problem.
The form factor just isn't useful for much other than telling the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848746</id>
	<title>CEO Socks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264101600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, one does want a hint of color...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , one does want a hint of color.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, one does want a hint of color...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848004</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264098420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would we wear our computers when they are already on our phones?</p><p>Or are they also looking at wearable phones?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would we wear our computers when they are already on our phones ? Or are they also looking at wearable phones ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would we wear our computers when they are already on our phones?Or are they also looking at wearable phones?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848742</id>
	<title>Wristwatch computer - came out in 80's</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264101540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had the predecessor to this watch back in the late 80's when I was in school.  I remember being able to change the channel in class of whatever we were watching and no one knew what was going on: http://www.amazon.com/Casio-Remote-Control-Calculator-SI1781/dp/B002VSO95G/ref=sr\_1\_4?ie=UTF8&amp;s=miscellaneous&amp;qid=1264097807&amp;sr=8-4</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had the predecessor to this watch back in the late 80 's when I was in school .
I remember being able to change the channel in class of whatever we were watching and no one knew what was going on : http : //www.amazon.com/Casio-Remote-Control-Calculator-SI1781/dp/B002VSO95G/ref = sr \ _1 \ _4 ? ie = UTF8&amp;s = miscellaneous&amp;qid = 1264097807&amp;sr = 8-4</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had the predecessor to this watch back in the late 80's when I was in school.
I remember being able to change the channel in class of whatever we were watching and no one knew what was going on: http://www.amazon.com/Casio-Remote-Control-Calculator-SI1781/dp/B002VSO95G/ref=sr\_1\_4?ie=UTF8&amp;s=miscellaneous&amp;qid=1264097807&amp;sr=8-4</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849498</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>iMac Were</author>
	<datestamp>1264104960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>but come one</p></div></blockquote><p>Can I come two, sweetie?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but come oneCan I come two , sweetie ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but come oneCan I come two, sweetie?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847908</id>
	<title>Yes!</title>
	<author>KneelBeforeZod</author>
	<datestamp>1264097940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now I can finally calculate how much to tip waitresses on my watch!   Oh wait, they invented that two decades ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I can finally calculate how much to tip waitresses on my watch !
Oh wait , they invented that two decades ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I can finally calculate how much to tip waitresses on my watch!
Oh wait, they invented that two decades ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30856604</id>
	<title>Re:small projectors will liberate video screens</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1264098360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>A projector could be as small as sugar cube, ring, or pen, yet illuminate a couple square feet of a wall or table top</p></div></blockquote><p>

Not as much as you think. Firstly a projector is too dim to be used in sunlight or under most 60w light bulbs. This makes it hard to do work as there often isn't enough light to see the keyboard, notepads (dead tree) or most other things.<br> <br>

Secondly think about where people use their laptops. I sure as hell will have problems using a projector on Singapore Airlines cattle class. What if I'm in a group of people (with laptops) and I have no surface to project upon? This scenario is more common then you think. I use my laptop exclusively for travelling, I have a desktop at home and work.<br> <br>

Projectors in laptops wont liberate us from the screen, we are not oppressed by the screen, the screen is our friend who shows us stuff. We wont have a replacement for the screen until we can create a 2D perfectly opaque hologram in thin air that has a similar power requirement. I predict that projectors in laptops and phones will be fads for a long time, too high power draw, too low brightness.<br> <br>

I also predict that flexible screens (FOLED) will be the next big thing in reducing laptop size.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A projector could be as small as sugar cube , ring , or pen , yet illuminate a couple square feet of a wall or table top Not as much as you think .
Firstly a projector is too dim to be used in sunlight or under most 60w light bulbs .
This makes it hard to do work as there often is n't enough light to see the keyboard , notepads ( dead tree ) or most other things .
Secondly think about where people use their laptops .
I sure as hell will have problems using a projector on Singapore Airlines cattle class .
What if I 'm in a group of people ( with laptops ) and I have no surface to project upon ?
This scenario is more common then you think .
I use my laptop exclusively for travelling , I have a desktop at home and work .
Projectors in laptops wont liberate us from the screen , we are not oppressed by the screen , the screen is our friend who shows us stuff .
We wont have a replacement for the screen until we can create a 2D perfectly opaque hologram in thin air that has a similar power requirement .
I predict that projectors in laptops and phones will be fads for a long time , too high power draw , too low brightness .
I also predict that flexible screens ( FOLED ) will be the next big thing in reducing laptop size .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A projector could be as small as sugar cube, ring, or pen, yet illuminate a couple square feet of a wall or table top

Not as much as you think.
Firstly a projector is too dim to be used in sunlight or under most 60w light bulbs.
This makes it hard to do work as there often isn't enough light to see the keyboard, notepads (dead tree) or most other things.
Secondly think about where people use their laptops.
I sure as hell will have problems using a projector on Singapore Airlines cattle class.
What if I'm in a group of people (with laptops) and I have no surface to project upon?
This scenario is more common then you think.
I use my laptop exclusively for travelling, I have a desktop at home and work.
Projectors in laptops wont liberate us from the screen, we are not oppressed by the screen, the screen is our friend who shows us stuff.
We wont have a replacement for the screen until we can create a 2D perfectly opaque hologram in thin air that has a similar power requirement.
I predict that projectors in laptops and phones will be fads for a long time, too high power draw, too low brightness.
I also predict that flexible screens (FOLED) will be the next big thing in reducing laptop size.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847720</id>
	<title>To Infinite... And Beyond!</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1264097160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it the future already?</p><p>How soon till I can flip open my wrist panel and call Star Command?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it the future already ? How soon till I can flip open my wrist panel and call Star Command ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it the future already?How soon till I can flip open my wrist panel and call Star Command?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848128</id>
	<title>Dead...?</title>
	<author>armyofone</author>
	<datestamp>1264098900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, but I won't believe it until confirmed by Netcraft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , but I wo n't believe it until confirmed by Netcraft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, but I won't believe it until confirmed by Netcraft.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847758</id>
	<title>This will go the way of the "Smart watch"</title>
	<author>mafian911</author>
	<datestamp>1264097340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anybody remember Microsoft's smart watch? No?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anybody remember Microsoft 's smart watch ?
No ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anybody remember Microsoft's smart watch?
No?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848114</id>
	<title>ASUS is dumb</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264098840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Everybody I know still wants a 9" netbook for $200.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everybody I know still wants a 9 " netbook for $ 200 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everybody I know still wants a 9" netbook for $200.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30851062</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1264067640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Have you ever tried typing/texting with a single hand?</p></div><p>For p0rn sites, it will be zero hands.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you ever tried typing/texting with a single hand ? For p0rn sites , it will be zero hands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you ever tried typing/texting with a single hand?For p0rn sites, it will be zero hands.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848604</id>
	<title>Re:eee...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264100940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Title: eee...</p></div><p>FTFY.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Title : eee...FTFY .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Title: eee...FTFY.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847914</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264097940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's erm... sort of a good point, but come one.  Think outside the box a little.  <br> <br>The desktop computer is on its way out for everyone but typists and coders.  When your wristwatch automatically interfaces with any number of large screens at your office or home, not to mention printers and fax machines, who is going to be worrying about the size of their watch display?  We have the technology to do that now... and that's just one of many possible evolutions of UI.  The possibilities are quite astounding.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's erm... sort of a good point , but come one .
Think outside the box a little .
The desktop computer is on its way out for everyone but typists and coders .
When your wristwatch automatically interfaces with any number of large screens at your office or home , not to mention printers and fax machines , who is going to be worrying about the size of their watch display ?
We have the technology to do that now... and that 's just one of many possible evolutions of UI .
The possibilities are quite astounding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's erm... sort of a good point, but come one.
Think outside the box a little.
The desktop computer is on its way out for everyone but typists and coders.
When your wristwatch automatically interfaces with any number of large screens at your office or home, not to mention printers and fax machines, who is going to be worrying about the size of their watch display?
We have the technology to do that now... and that's just one of many possible evolutions of UI.
The possibilities are quite astounding.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850142</id>
	<title>spot to plug in AR headset</title>
	<author>zero0ne</author>
	<datestamp>1264064460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wristwatches have huge potential.</p><p>just need AR to take off first.</p><p>hell there wouldn't even need to be a wire, you could just use Bluetooth or whatever future short distance wireless transmitting tech there is.</p><p>Watch serving as your computer.<br>AR headset over one eye or both.<br>voice recognition instead of a keyboard.<br>Glove / pen like device for mouse movements / pointing etc.</p><p>The only thing holding anything back right now is the time to integrate all these current and developing technologies into one device (and shrink the size).</p><p>Not to be a MS fanboy, but project Natal is one of many, many steps in the right direction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wristwatches have huge potential.just need AR to take off first.hell there would n't even need to be a wire , you could just use Bluetooth or whatever future short distance wireless transmitting tech there is.Watch serving as your computer.AR headset over one eye or both.voice recognition instead of a keyboard.Glove / pen like device for mouse movements / pointing etc.The only thing holding anything back right now is the time to integrate all these current and developing technologies into one device ( and shrink the size ) .Not to be a MS fanboy , but project Natal is one of many , many steps in the right direction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wristwatches have huge potential.just need AR to take off first.hell there wouldn't even need to be a wire, you could just use Bluetooth or whatever future short distance wireless transmitting tech there is.Watch serving as your computer.AR headset over one eye or both.voice recognition instead of a keyboard.Glove / pen like device for mouse movements / pointing etc.The only thing holding anything back right now is the time to integrate all these current and developing technologies into one device (and shrink the size).Not to be a MS fanboy, but project Natal is one of many, many steps in the right direction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848214</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>frank\_adrian314159</author>
	<datestamp>1264099200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>a 1"x1" oval viewing screen strapped to your wrist</i> </p><p>Nah, it's going to be a "Flavor Flav"-style wearable that goes around your neck - 17" screen and all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a 1 " x1 " oval viewing screen strapped to your wrist Nah , it 's going to be a " Flavor Flav " -style wearable that goes around your neck - 17 " screen and all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a 1"x1" oval viewing screen strapped to your wrist Nah, it's going to be a "Flavor Flav"-style wearable that goes around your neck - 17" screen and all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848430</id>
	<title>Re:Dead already?</title>
	<author>Taibhsear</author>
	<datestamp>1264100160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But hey, if you filter out editorial stupidity from slashdot we will have only one or two "news" every week or so.</p></div><p>You appear to have accidentally a whole word there...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But hey , if you filter out editorial stupidity from slashdot we will have only one or two " news " every week or so.You appear to have accidentally a whole word there.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But hey, if you filter out editorial stupidity from slashdot we will have only one or two "news" every week or so.You appear to have accidentally a whole word there...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847924</id>
	<title>Leela's Wristamacallit or Wrist-lo-jackimater</title>
	<author>Xibby</author>
	<datestamp>1264098000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gives real-time stock market quotes, forecasts the weather, beams distress signals from anywhere in the universe, and tells the time in over thirty-six thousand time zones.  (from the back of the action figure box)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gives real-time stock market quotes , forecasts the weather , beams distress signals from anywhere in the universe , and tells the time in over thirty-six thousand time zones .
( from the back of the action figure box )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gives real-time stock market quotes, forecasts the weather, beams distress signals from anywhere in the universe, and tells the time in over thirty-six thousand time zones.
(from the back of the action figure box)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848032</id>
	<title>Re:Point of order....</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1264098480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just so Asus is aware. If the netbook is truly dead after only 26 (or so) months then you did not 'pioneer a new class of computer', you 'started a short-lived fad'.</p></div><p>What's fascinating is that we still even listen to the suits and their marketspeak. If I had a penny for everytime some guy in a suit thought he had the next "revolution in [tech]", I'd be a $1E+06. O\_o Netbooks became popular because for a lot of people -- that's what they spend most of their time doing.</p><p>When my friends hangout at our apartment, we all bring our laptops. Life without internet is scary! But a number of us have internet on our iphones, or wifi on smartphones and other devices, and spending $250 to have a very small form-factor laptop that can do internet isn't a bad idea -- it's something to throw in the bag on the way out the door, just in case you need to check e-mail or google something quick. Netbooks filled a niche -- which is now being taken over by more capable smartphones and embedded devices. That niche, however, is very much still alive and advances in technology or price reductions on netbooks could easily revive them.</p><p>People don't care what you call the thing, as long as it does what they want it to... and it helps if it looks good doing it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just so Asus is aware .
If the netbook is truly dead after only 26 ( or so ) months then you did not 'pioneer a new class of computer ' , you 'started a short-lived fad'.What 's fascinating is that we still even listen to the suits and their marketspeak .
If I had a penny for everytime some guy in a suit thought he had the next " revolution in [ tech ] " , I 'd be a $ 1E + 06 .
O \ _o Netbooks became popular because for a lot of people -- that 's what they spend most of their time doing.When my friends hangout at our apartment , we all bring our laptops .
Life without internet is scary !
But a number of us have internet on our iphones , or wifi on smartphones and other devices , and spending $ 250 to have a very small form-factor laptop that can do internet is n't a bad idea -- it 's something to throw in the bag on the way out the door , just in case you need to check e-mail or google something quick .
Netbooks filled a niche -- which is now being taken over by more capable smartphones and embedded devices .
That niche , however , is very much still alive and advances in technology or price reductions on netbooks could easily revive them.People do n't care what you call the thing , as long as it does what they want it to... and it helps if it looks good doing it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just so Asus is aware.
If the netbook is truly dead after only 26 (or so) months then you did not 'pioneer a new class of computer', you 'started a short-lived fad'.What's fascinating is that we still even listen to the suits and their marketspeak.
If I had a penny for everytime some guy in a suit thought he had the next "revolution in [tech]", I'd be a $1E+06.
O\_o Netbooks became popular because for a lot of people -- that's what they spend most of their time doing.When my friends hangout at our apartment, we all bring our laptops.
Life without internet is scary!
But a number of us have internet on our iphones, or wifi on smartphones and other devices, and spending $250 to have a very small form-factor laptop that can do internet isn't a bad idea -- it's something to throw in the bag on the way out the door, just in case you need to check e-mail or google something quick.
Netbooks filled a niche -- which is now being taken over by more capable smartphones and embedded devices.
That niche, however, is very much still alive and advances in technology or price reductions on netbooks could easily revive them.People don't care what you call the thing, as long as it does what they want it to... and it helps if it looks good doing it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848372</id>
	<title>Re:Pipboy</title>
	<author>biryokumaru</author>
	<datestamp>1264099860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>FO3</p></div><p>For <i>shame</i>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FO3For shame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FO3For shame.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849456</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264104780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've typed with one hand, if you know what i mean.</p><p>But really, it is pretty simple to type with one hand, especially if the keyboard was designed around typing with one hand.</p><p>In something the size of your average computer watches, you could have 6-8 buttons across the bottom, LED matrix buttons, 2 buttons rotate the keys currently showing in the other spaces.<br>Or there could be a dial for that under the buttons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've typed with one hand , if you know what i mean.But really , it is pretty simple to type with one hand , especially if the keyboard was designed around typing with one hand.In something the size of your average computer watches , you could have 6-8 buttons across the bottom , LED matrix buttons , 2 buttons rotate the keys currently showing in the other spaces.Or there could be a dial for that under the buttons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've typed with one hand, if you know what i mean.But really, it is pretty simple to type with one hand, especially if the keyboard was designed around typing with one hand.In something the size of your average computer watches, you could have 6-8 buttons across the bottom, LED matrix buttons, 2 buttons rotate the keys currently showing in the other spaces.Or there could be a dial for that under the buttons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848396</id>
	<title>Typists</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1264099980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The desktop computer is on its way out for everyone but typists and coders.</p></div><p>And guess what anyone is who writes e-mail, blog posts, or forum posts: a typist.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The desktop computer is on its way out for everyone but typists and coders.And guess what anyone is who writes e-mail , blog posts , or forum posts : a typist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The desktop computer is on its way out for everyone but typists and coders.And guess what anyone is who writes e-mail, blog posts, or forum posts: a typist.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848780</id>
	<title>Digital watches</title>
	<author>mattbee</author>
	<datestamp>1264101780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those are still a pretty neat idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those are still a pretty neat idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those are still a pretty neat idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847840</id>
	<title>Re:Here we go</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1264097640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wristwatch computers? I want a wristwatch phone! A wrist watch is far too small to use as a computer; even my i776 cell phone is crappy using it to access the internet, as the screen is way too small.</p><p>The netbook, otoh, is small enough to carry around and big enough to watch a movie on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wristwatch computers ?
I want a wristwatch phone !
A wrist watch is far too small to use as a computer ; even my i776 cell phone is crappy using it to access the internet , as the screen is way too small.The netbook , otoh , is small enough to carry around and big enough to watch a movie on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wristwatch computers?
I want a wristwatch phone!
A wrist watch is far too small to use as a computer; even my i776 cell phone is crappy using it to access the internet, as the screen is way too small.The netbook, otoh, is small enough to carry around and big enough to watch a movie on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847694</id>
	<title>DUPE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264097040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A dupe from Dick Tracy, that is.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; This "wearable computer" crap comes along every 5 years. It's still the epitome of lame, even by slashdot standards.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A dupe from Dick Tracy , that is .
          This " wearable computer " crap comes along every 5 years .
It 's still the epitome of lame , even by slashdot standards .
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext>A dupe from Dick Tracy, that is.
          This "wearable computer" crap comes along every 5 years.
It's still the epitome of lame, even by slashdot standards.
     </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848712</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>rolfwind</author>
	<datestamp>1264101420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The desktop computer is on its way out for everyone but typists and coders. When your wristwatch automatically interfaces with any number of large screens at your office or home, not to mention printers and fax machines, who is going to be worrying about the size of their watch display? We have the technology to do that now... and that's just one of many possible evolutions of UI. The possibilities are quite astounding.</p></div></blockquote><p>The desktop has been "dying" forever.  You know who likes desktops?  People who want to input into their computers worth a damn.  The miniature keyboards and screens on other devices aren't efficient enough for serious all day use.</p><p>Do you:<br>-want to type up a report on a phone?<br>-want to do CAD drawings on anything but a desktop?<br>-want to design anything on anything but a desktop?<br>-want to use mathematica on a phone?</p><p>I'm sure, with time, there will be apps that do all these things on phones, but just shittier.  I have tried various voice-to-text things, it's not there yet, but even at 100\%, you're not going to replace a keyboard, if nothing but the simple reason of driving everyone around you nuts.  But also because editing with voice sucks and is slower.  The only thing going to replace a keyboard is mind control... possibly eye control.</p><p>(BTW I would include most notebooks in the same category as desktops because: their alphabetical keyboards are about the same size, the screens are equivalent or even bigger than many early desktops and still 50-75\% of the size of normal ones today.  Basically, a notebook managed to maintain the size of all the actual user interface parts of a desktop and shrink everything else, in terms of power being almost a desktop equivalent.  Also because there is no fundamental difference is the usage of the two other than portability -- a phone or watch have other forms for different functions.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The desktop computer is on its way out for everyone but typists and coders .
When your wristwatch automatically interfaces with any number of large screens at your office or home , not to mention printers and fax machines , who is going to be worrying about the size of their watch display ?
We have the technology to do that now... and that 's just one of many possible evolutions of UI .
The possibilities are quite astounding.The desktop has been " dying " forever .
You know who likes desktops ?
People who want to input into their computers worth a damn .
The miniature keyboards and screens on other devices are n't efficient enough for serious all day use.Do you : -want to type up a report on a phone ? -want to do CAD drawings on anything but a desktop ? -want to design anything on anything but a desktop ? -want to use mathematica on a phone ? I 'm sure , with time , there will be apps that do all these things on phones , but just shittier .
I have tried various voice-to-text things , it 's not there yet , but even at 100 \ % , you 're not going to replace a keyboard , if nothing but the simple reason of driving everyone around you nuts .
But also because editing with voice sucks and is slower .
The only thing going to replace a keyboard is mind control... possibly eye control .
( BTW I would include most notebooks in the same category as desktops because : their alphabetical keyboards are about the same size , the screens are equivalent or even bigger than many early desktops and still 50-75 \ % of the size of normal ones today .
Basically , a notebook managed to maintain the size of all the actual user interface parts of a desktop and shrink everything else , in terms of power being almost a desktop equivalent .
Also because there is no fundamental difference is the usage of the two other than portability -- a phone or watch have other forms for different functions .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The desktop computer is on its way out for everyone but typists and coders.
When your wristwatch automatically interfaces with any number of large screens at your office or home, not to mention printers and fax machines, who is going to be worrying about the size of their watch display?
We have the technology to do that now... and that's just one of many possible evolutions of UI.
The possibilities are quite astounding.The desktop has been "dying" forever.
You know who likes desktops?
People who want to input into their computers worth a damn.
The miniature keyboards and screens on other devices aren't efficient enough for serious all day use.Do you:-want to type up a report on a phone?-want to do CAD drawings on anything but a desktop?-want to design anything on anything but a desktop?-want to use mathematica on a phone?I'm sure, with time, there will be apps that do all these things on phones, but just shittier.
I have tried various voice-to-text things, it's not there yet, but even at 100\%, you're not going to replace a keyboard, if nothing but the simple reason of driving everyone around you nuts.
But also because editing with voice sucks and is slower.
The only thing going to replace a keyboard is mind control... possibly eye control.
(BTW I would include most notebooks in the same category as desktops because: their alphabetical keyboards are about the same size, the screens are equivalent or even bigger than many early desktops and still 50-75\% of the size of normal ones today.
Basically, a notebook managed to maintain the size of all the actual user interface parts of a desktop and shrink everything else, in terms of power being almost a desktop equivalent.
Also because there is no fundamental difference is the usage of the two other than portability -- a phone or watch have other forms for different functions.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848324</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>Issarlk</author>
	<datestamp>1264099680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because then you can hold your phone to watch TV while typing on the wrist computer to chat with a friend over MSN.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because then you can hold your phone to watch TV while typing on the wrist computer to chat with a friend over MSN .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because then you can hold your phone to watch TV while typing on the wrist computer to chat with a friend over MSN.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30856404</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>LandGator</author>
	<datestamp>1264095900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>we *write* with one hand now.  QWERTYUIOP is not the sole input mode, after all.

A competent handwriting interface should be able to parse out alphabet or words from finger motions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>we * write * with one hand now .
QWERTYUIOP is not the sole input mode , after all .
A competent handwriting interface should be able to parse out alphabet or words from finger motions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we *write* with one hand now.
QWERTYUIOP is not the sole input mode, after all.
A competent handwriting interface should be able to parse out alphabet or words from finger motions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847702</id>
	<title>Here we go</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264097100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wristwatch computers. (One more thing for my cat to attack.)</p><p>IMO, this is simply yet another attempt to manufacture a "need" where none exists as in The Next Big Thing...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wristwatch computers .
( One more thing for my cat to attack .
) IMO , this is simply yet another attempt to manufacture a " need " where none exists as in The Next Big Thing.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wristwatch computers.
(One more thing for my cat to attack.
)IMO, this is simply yet another attempt to manufacture a "need" where none exists as in The Next Big Thing...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30853482</id>
	<title>Re:ASUS is dumb</title>
	<author>maitas</author>
	<datestamp>1264075380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go to Ebay and look for Asus 900A refurbished. Thats it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go to Ebay and look for Asus 900A refurbished .
Thats it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go to Ebay and look for Asus 900A refurbished.
Thats it</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848550</id>
	<title>small projectors will liberate video screens</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264100580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A problem with wristwatch and cellphone computers are their relatively tiny screens.
A projector could be as small as sugar cube, ring, or pen, yet illuminate a couple square feet of a wall or table top.  Some cell phones are already coming out with projectors.
<br> <br>
I saw some neat demos at SIGGRAPH of self-registering projectors.  You only have to get them approximately head-on.  Tehn they detect the descrepency and warp the projection into the perfect desired rectangle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A problem with wristwatch and cellphone computers are their relatively tiny screens .
A projector could be as small as sugar cube , ring , or pen , yet illuminate a couple square feet of a wall or table top .
Some cell phones are already coming out with projectors .
I saw some neat demos at SIGGRAPH of self-registering projectors .
You only have to get them approximately head-on .
Tehn they detect the descrepency and warp the projection into the perfect desired rectangle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A problem with wristwatch and cellphone computers are their relatively tiny screens.
A projector could be as small as sugar cube, ring, or pen, yet illuminate a couple square feet of a wall or table top.
Some cell phones are already coming out with projectors.
I saw some neat demos at SIGGRAPH of self-registering projectors.
You only have to get them approximately head-on.
Tehn they detect the descrepency and warp the projection into the perfect desired rectangle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850208</id>
	<title>Re:History of computing paradigms</title>
	<author>Bent Mind</author>
	<datestamp>1264064760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>*Notebook computer (2007-?): Can put it in your purse and hold it like the bible, but good luck reading a document, doing anything useful. My wife uses hers to play Netflix movies while she uses her fullsize laptop.</p></div><p>My Wife disagrees a bit. She likes to read a lot. I tried the full size laptop, it was too bulky. I tried the PDA, the display was too small. The Netbook fit just right with her needs. She uses it for reading (ebooks), email, SIP, movies, and notes. She uses the desktop for document creation as she prefers a full size keyboard.<br> <br>
As for the Tablet, my brother is the artist type. He uses a tablet computer as a portable sketch book.<br> <br>
The rest I agree with.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>* Notebook computer ( 2007- ?
) : Can put it in your purse and hold it like the bible , but good luck reading a document , doing anything useful .
My wife uses hers to play Netflix movies while she uses her fullsize laptop.My Wife disagrees a bit .
She likes to read a lot .
I tried the full size laptop , it was too bulky .
I tried the PDA , the display was too small .
The Netbook fit just right with her needs .
She uses it for reading ( ebooks ) , email , SIP , movies , and notes .
She uses the desktop for document creation as she prefers a full size keyboard .
As for the Tablet , my brother is the artist type .
He uses a tablet computer as a portable sketch book .
The rest I agree with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*Notebook computer (2007-?
): Can put it in your purse and hold it like the bible, but good luck reading a document, doing anything useful.
My wife uses hers to play Netflix movies while she uses her fullsize laptop.My Wife disagrees a bit.
She likes to read a lot.
I tried the full size laptop, it was too bulky.
I tried the PDA, the display was too small.
The Netbook fit just right with her needs.
She uses it for reading (ebooks), email, SIP, movies, and notes.
She uses the desktop for document creation as she prefers a full size keyboard.
As for the Tablet, my brother is the artist type.
He uses a tablet computer as a portable sketch book.
The rest I agree with.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848074</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>cromar</author>
	<datestamp>1264098660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about dictation, or handwriting recognition (say writing a letter and scanning it with the watch).  Or how about your watch serves a number of functions that don't rely on typing, including serving as your data uplink.  Your other devices would interface with your watch to send and receive data.  You could write your letter on another device you carry, such as tablet PC or iPod, which would then use your watch to send the email.<br> <br>The future looks pretty cool if you think outside the box a little.  It's very easy to start thinking that windowing systems and cell phones are the pinnacle of UIs, but they are not, and do not particularly integrate well with normal human life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about dictation , or handwriting recognition ( say writing a letter and scanning it with the watch ) .
Or how about your watch serves a number of functions that do n't rely on typing , including serving as your data uplink .
Your other devices would interface with your watch to send and receive data .
You could write your letter on another device you carry , such as tablet PC or iPod , which would then use your watch to send the email .
The future looks pretty cool if you think outside the box a little .
It 's very easy to start thinking that windowing systems and cell phones are the pinnacle of UIs , but they are not , and do not particularly integrate well with normal human life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about dictation, or handwriting recognition (say writing a letter and scanning it with the watch).
Or how about your watch serves a number of functions that don't rely on typing, including serving as your data uplink.
Your other devices would interface with your watch to send and receive data.
You could write your letter on another device you carry, such as tablet PC or iPod, which would then use your watch to send the email.
The future looks pretty cool if you think outside the box a little.
It's very easy to start thinking that windowing systems and cell phones are the pinnacle of UIs, but they are not, and do not particularly integrate well with normal human life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849998</id>
	<title>I like that</title>
	<author>imerso</author>
	<datestamp>1264107000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, I like that, because for things where I need to type fast or a big screen, I use a notebook or desktop.

As a programmer and computers fanatic, I like the idea of having one computer always available everywhere, better yet if it does not need a pocket (like my iPhone, for instance). It needs to keep me informed of new emails, allow me to read some news, do some searching, locate me, play mp3, show a small video, etc. No need for fast typing on this type of device.

So I am all for it, and will buy one for sure when it becomes available -- well, if it has enough power, of course. =)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I like that , because for things where I need to type fast or a big screen , I use a notebook or desktop .
As a programmer and computers fanatic , I like the idea of having one computer always available everywhere , better yet if it does not need a pocket ( like my iPhone , for instance ) .
It needs to keep me informed of new emails , allow me to read some news , do some searching , locate me , play mp3 , show a small video , etc .
No need for fast typing on this type of device .
So I am all for it , and will buy one for sure when it becomes available -- well , if it has enough power , of course .
= )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I like that, because for things where I need to type fast or a big screen, I use a notebook or desktop.
As a programmer and computers fanatic, I like the idea of having one computer always available everywhere, better yet if it does not need a pocket (like my iPhone, for instance).
It needs to keep me informed of new emails, allow me to read some news, do some searching, locate me, play mp3, show a small video, etc.
No need for fast typing on this type of device.
So I am all for it, and will buy one for sure when it becomes available -- well, if it has enough power, of course.
=)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848060</id>
	<title>Re:Point of order....</title>
	<author>mewsenews</author>
	<datestamp>1264098600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reading the article (yeah yeah), he says nothing about the netbook being "dead" or even declining. Just your standard Slashdot editorial slant -- fabricating a headline out of thin air.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reading the article ( yeah yeah ) , he says nothing about the netbook being " dead " or even declining .
Just your standard Slashdot editorial slant -- fabricating a headline out of thin air .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reading the article (yeah yeah), he says nothing about the netbook being "dead" or even declining.
Just your standard Slashdot editorial slant -- fabricating a headline out of thin air.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848966</id>
	<title>Re:This will go the way of the "Smart watch"</title>
	<author>bell.colin</author>
	<datestamp>1264102680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, M$N Is still sneaking in charges on my credit card for a trial i was dumb enough (at the time when i still liked MS) to activate a trial for one that i won at a conference (Comdex 03 i think?) Despite the fact the page stated it would only use my CC for verification purposes for the trial (which i never renewed because the damn thing didn't even work)
<br>
<br>
I can't call to cancel since i have no flipping idea what disposable msn acct name i created just to play with this damn thing so i just keep telling the CC people to dispute and say i never signed up for such a service (i signed up for a free trial and didn't renew, i never signed up for anything to purchase) MS only started charging about 2 years later and keep trying to sneak it in every so ofter. (Fucking M$N Assholes are worse than AOhelL)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , M $ N Is still sneaking in charges on my credit card for a trial i was dumb enough ( at the time when i still liked MS ) to activate a trial for one that i won at a conference ( Comdex 03 i think ?
) Despite the fact the page stated it would only use my CC for verification purposes for the trial ( which i never renewed because the damn thing did n't even work ) I ca n't call to cancel since i have no flipping idea what disposable msn acct name i created just to play with this damn thing so i just keep telling the CC people to dispute and say i never signed up for such a service ( i signed up for a free trial and did n't renew , i never signed up for anything to purchase ) MS only started charging about 2 years later and keep trying to sneak it in every so ofter .
( Fucking M $ N Assholes are worse than AOhelL )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, M$N Is still sneaking in charges on my credit card for a trial i was dumb enough (at the time when i still liked MS) to activate a trial for one that i won at a conference (Comdex 03 i think?
) Despite the fact the page stated it would only use my CC for verification purposes for the trial (which i never renewed because the damn thing didn't even work)


I can't call to cancel since i have no flipping idea what disposable msn acct name i created just to play with this damn thing so i just keep telling the CC people to dispute and say i never signed up for such a service (i signed up for a free trial and didn't renew, i never signed up for anything to purchase) MS only started charging about 2 years later and keep trying to sneak it in every so ofter.
(Fucking M$N Assholes are worse than AOhelL)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849144</id>
	<title>I had a Casio databank in 1987...</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1264103460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was a wearable computer.  Had an address book, calculator, alarms, timers, and whatever else I'm forgetting.</p><p>It was cool as shit for a kid, but it was a rather big pain in the ass to use, and all in all not real useful since the screen was the size of a postage stamp.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a wearable computer .
Had an address book , calculator , alarms , timers , and whatever else I 'm forgetting.It was cool as shit for a kid , but it was a rather big pain in the ass to use , and all in all not real useful since the screen was the size of a postage stamp .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a wearable computer.
Had an address book, calculator, alarms, timers, and whatever else I'm forgetting.It was cool as shit for a kid, but it was a rather big pain in the ass to use, and all in all not real useful since the screen was the size of a postage stamp.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848676</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264101240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The desktop computer is on its way out for everyone but typists and coders.</p></div><p>If I was 10 years younger, I'd have to ask you: "What's a typist?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The desktop computer is on its way out for everyone but typists and coders.If I was 10 years younger , I 'd have to ask you : " What 's a typist ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The desktop computer is on its way out for everyone but typists and coders.If I was 10 years younger, I'd have to ask you: "What's a typist?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848908</id>
	<title>Very easy...</title>
	<author>Domini</author>
	<datestamp>1264102440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... with the companying wearable 3D glasses.</p><p>But then again... why have a watch at all? Or would the weight of the glasses be prohibitive?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... with the companying wearable 3D glasses.But then again... why have a watch at all ?
Or would the weight of the glasses be prohibitive ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... with the companying wearable 3D glasses.But then again... why have a watch at all?
Or would the weight of the glasses be prohibitive?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850328</id>
	<title>If the netbook is dead it's because of Asus</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1264065120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps they shouldn't be shoving bloated OSes, like Windows onto their netbooks and trying to turn netbooks into laptops. Replacing SSDs and Linux with HDs and Windows was just dumb.
<br> <br>
Hopefully Google won't cock up their Chrome OS and we'll see some decent netbooks back on the market.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps they should n't be shoving bloated OSes , like Windows onto their netbooks and trying to turn netbooks into laptops .
Replacing SSDs and Linux with HDs and Windows was just dumb .
Hopefully Google wo n't cock up their Chrome OS and we 'll see some decent netbooks back on the market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps they shouldn't be shoving bloated OSes, like Windows onto their netbooks and trying to turn netbooks into laptops.
Replacing SSDs and Linux with HDs and Windows was just dumb.
Hopefully Google won't cock up their Chrome OS and we'll see some decent netbooks back on the market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847730</id>
	<title>Point of order....</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1264097220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just so Asus is aware. If the netbook is truly dead after only 26 (or so) months then you did <i>not</i> 'pioneer a new class of computer', you 'started a short-lived fad'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just so Asus is aware .
If the netbook is truly dead after only 26 ( or so ) months then you did not 'pioneer a new class of computer ' , you 'started a short-lived fad' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just so Asus is aware.
If the netbook is truly dead after only 26 (or so) months then you did not 'pioneer a new class of computer', you 'started a short-lived fad'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847928</id>
	<title>Re:eeh...</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1264098000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the watch was just a display+wireless to the main unit, it wouldn't need much juice.  Consider it a way to dual/triple head your phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the watch was just a display + wireless to the main unit , it would n't need much juice .
Consider it a way to dual/triple head your phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the watch was just a display+wireless to the main unit, it wouldn't need much juice.
Consider it a way to dual/triple head your phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847846</id>
	<title>Once we get voice recognition, that is</title>
	<author>CityZen</author>
	<datestamp>1264097640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously, current user interfaces would suck on a watch.</p><p>However, give that puppy *good* voice recognition and speech output, and then they're on to something.</p><p>However, at this point in time, it doesn't seem like we've got the processing &amp; battery density necessary for this to work well.  Eventually, though, who knows?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously , current user interfaces would suck on a watch.However , give that puppy * good * voice recognition and speech output , and then they 're on to something.However , at this point in time , it does n't seem like we 've got the processing &amp; battery density necessary for this to work well .
Eventually , though , who knows ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously, current user interfaces would suck on a watch.However, give that puppy *good* voice recognition and speech output, and then they're on to something.However, at this point in time, it doesn't seem like we've got the processing &amp; battery density necessary for this to work well.
Eventually, though, who knows?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1264097280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to mention you'll only have one hand to use it with. Have you ever tried typing/texting with a single hand? Its not as intuitive as two thumbs or a full fledged keyboard with 10 fingers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention you 'll only have one hand to use it with .
Have you ever tried typing/texting with a single hand ?
Its not as intuitive as two thumbs or a full fledged keyboard with 10 fingers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention you'll only have one hand to use it with.
Have you ever tried typing/texting with a single hand?
Its not as intuitive as two thumbs or a full fledged keyboard with 10 fingers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848110</id>
	<title>Re:This will go the way of the "Smart watch"</title>
	<author>IANAAC</author>
	<datestamp>1264098840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had one and liked it generally, aside from the miserable battery life.
<p>
But it's really stupid to even consider comparing something you wear and something you use to actually get work done. I realize these suits want us to believe that netbooks are only capable of media consumption, but they're capable of and used for much more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had one and liked it generally , aside from the miserable battery life .
But it 's really stupid to even consider comparing something you wear and something you use to actually get work done .
I realize these suits want us to believe that netbooks are only capable of media consumption , but they 're capable of and used for much more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had one and liked it generally, aside from the miserable battery life.
But it's really stupid to even consider comparing something you wear and something you use to actually get work done.
I realize these suits want us to believe that netbooks are only capable of media consumption, but they're capable of and used for much more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849016</id>
	<title>Re:Not on my wrist</title>
	<author>zmollusc</author>
	<datestamp>1264102920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hehe, we are opposite. I \_always\_ wear my watch. It is good for 200 feet underwater so i don't have to take it off while swimming/washing up/working in dusty grimy environments, it sets itself with radio signals so it is always accurate and it costs &pound;19.99 for a new one if it gets broken.</p><p>I also have many clocks kicking around, but I find it is automatic to glance at my wristwatch and get the actual time rather than look for the clock in the corner of the desktop, on a microwave oven, dvd player, car dashboard or drag my phone out of my pocket and wonder if it is telling the right time (my phone has gps and internet connectivity as well as the digital phone network and yet it still needs me to set its clock for it).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hehe , we are opposite .
I \ _always \ _ wear my watch .
It is good for 200 feet underwater so i do n't have to take it off while swimming/washing up/working in dusty grimy environments , it sets itself with radio signals so it is always accurate and it costs   19.99 for a new one if it gets broken.I also have many clocks kicking around , but I find it is automatic to glance at my wristwatch and get the actual time rather than look for the clock in the corner of the desktop , on a microwave oven , dvd player , car dashboard or drag my phone out of my pocket and wonder if it is telling the right time ( my phone has gps and internet connectivity as well as the digital phone network and yet it still needs me to set its clock for it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hehe, we are opposite.
I \_always\_ wear my watch.
It is good for 200 feet underwater so i don't have to take it off while swimming/washing up/working in dusty grimy environments, it sets itself with radio signals so it is always accurate and it costs £19.99 for a new one if it gets broken.I also have many clocks kicking around, but I find it is automatic to glance at my wristwatch and get the actual time rather than look for the clock in the corner of the desktop, on a microwave oven, dvd player, car dashboard or drag my phone out of my pocket and wonder if it is telling the right time (my phone has gps and internet connectivity as well as the digital phone network and yet it still needs me to set its clock for it).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848796</id>
	<title>Re:Point of order....</title>
	<author>Bakkster</author>
	<datestamp>1264101900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Netbooks only died because nobody wants to put SSDs in them any more.  A netbook was useful to me because it had only one moving part (a fan), was low pwer enough to use during class, and had a full keyboard.  If flash memory were cheaper, I think we'd see it continuing to fulfill that niche.  As soon as you add an HDD, it's just a small, weak, expensive laptop.
</p><p>That said, I still love my 1st-gen Eee PC for travel.  There are times I want a keyboard and the Droid just isn't big enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Netbooks only died because nobody wants to put SSDs in them any more .
A netbook was useful to me because it had only one moving part ( a fan ) , was low pwer enough to use during class , and had a full keyboard .
If flash memory were cheaper , I think we 'd see it continuing to fulfill that niche .
As soon as you add an HDD , it 's just a small , weak , expensive laptop .
That said , I still love my 1st-gen Eee PC for travel .
There are times I want a keyboard and the Droid just is n't big enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Netbooks only died because nobody wants to put SSDs in them any more.
A netbook was useful to me because it had only one moving part (a fan), was low pwer enough to use during class, and had a full keyboard.
If flash memory were cheaper, I think we'd see it continuing to fulfill that niche.
As soon as you add an HDD, it's just a small, weak, expensive laptop.
That said, I still love my 1st-gen Eee PC for travel.
There are times I want a keyboard and the Droid just isn't big enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847994</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264098360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you bothered to look at the article, the concept picture is not a 1"x1" oval viewing screen.  It has a decent sized screen, larger than a cell phone.  You know that any argument against the screen size and usefulness is applicable to cell phones, right?  We've heard them before, and the market has proven them wrong.</p><p>Why would viewing large PDF attachments on a mobile device be the dividing line between useful and useless? How often do you do that even on your PC? This is a device that's they're saying is the next step from netbooks, not a PC replacement.</p><p>BTW, a 1"x1" oval is called a 1" circle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you bothered to look at the article , the concept picture is not a 1 " x1 " oval viewing screen .
It has a decent sized screen , larger than a cell phone .
You know that any argument against the screen size and usefulness is applicable to cell phones , right ?
We 've heard them before , and the market has proven them wrong.Why would viewing large PDF attachments on a mobile device be the dividing line between useful and useless ?
How often do you do that even on your PC ?
This is a device that 's they 're saying is the next step from netbooks , not a PC replacement.BTW , a 1 " x1 " oval is called a 1 " circle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you bothered to look at the article, the concept picture is not a 1"x1" oval viewing screen.
It has a decent sized screen, larger than a cell phone.
You know that any argument against the screen size and usefulness is applicable to cell phones, right?
We've heard them before, and the market has proven them wrong.Why would viewing large PDF attachments on a mobile device be the dividing line between useful and useless?
How often do you do that even on your PC?
This is a device that's they're saying is the next step from netbooks, not a PC replacement.BTW, a 1"x1" oval is called a 1" circle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30851462</id>
	<title>Futurama?</title>
	<author>Antony-Kyre</author>
	<datestamp>1264068780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about what Leela is wearing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about what Leela is wearing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about what Leela is wearing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847774</id>
	<title>Fashion Forward</title>
	<author>ElectricBuddha</author>
	<datestamp>1264097400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ahhh, my years of wearing Casio watches finally pays off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahhh , my years of wearing Casio watches finally pays off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahhh, my years of wearing Casio watches finally pays off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848556</id>
	<title>Personally... i think he's a little off-track</title>
	<author>pjr.cc</author>
	<datestamp>1264100640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As others have pointed out, i think it'll move to the optical. Glasses you wear that have a screen in them... and given where e-ink is going that may not be too far away. Thats not to say the wrist wouldnt be in use, after all if you no longer need a display, a mobile phone could take on a much different (wrist-wrapping) form factor.</p><p>But i also believe one area that mostly goes untouched is proximity type computing. I.e. I sit down at the "computer" at work and im in close enough proximity that the glasses display something related to that. Theres a whole range of things that could be done in the proximity range... for example removing those clumsy lcd/led displays on appliances at home and have a proximity thing in your mobile phone (hey, you carry it with you everywhere anyways). Similar to bluetooth but without all the authentication (though based more on mutual induction then actual radio waves as such), who cares if someone can walk up to your microwave and use it with their own mobile phone. Thats not to say auth wouldnt be required (a-lah work computer would require it), but pairing things is a pain when its just something simple.</p><p>It'd be nice to abstract information from everything into a format that suited myself, rather then the other way around... What I mean is that your microwave could send your phone the parameters it needs to operate it and your phone could display it for you in a way you like. From an informational perspective it would uniquely useful, i.e. stand at a bus stop and get an up-to-date timetable "bus 483 is running 10 minutes behind schedule".. Add a few standards to it all and it would really shape our lives in many ways.</p><p>I do agree with him when he talks about the "dull pc roadmap" (4 to 8 to 16 cores, etc), and i think ARM (heh, theres a pun there somewhere - get an arm on your wrist or something) may in the future have a fair bit to say about it.</p><p>But then again, im longing for the Peter F Hamilton experience... I want my affinity gene (and all this wonderful other ideas in the commonwealth/confederation books)!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As others have pointed out , i think it 'll move to the optical .
Glasses you wear that have a screen in them... and given where e-ink is going that may not be too far away .
Thats not to say the wrist wouldnt be in use , after all if you no longer need a display , a mobile phone could take on a much different ( wrist-wrapping ) form factor.But i also believe one area that mostly goes untouched is proximity type computing .
I.e. I sit down at the " computer " at work and im in close enough proximity that the glasses display something related to that .
Theres a whole range of things that could be done in the proximity range... for example removing those clumsy lcd/led displays on appliances at home and have a proximity thing in your mobile phone ( hey , you carry it with you everywhere anyways ) .
Similar to bluetooth but without all the authentication ( though based more on mutual induction then actual radio waves as such ) , who cares if someone can walk up to your microwave and use it with their own mobile phone .
Thats not to say auth wouldnt be required ( a-lah work computer would require it ) , but pairing things is a pain when its just something simple.It 'd be nice to abstract information from everything into a format that suited myself , rather then the other way around... What I mean is that your microwave could send your phone the parameters it needs to operate it and your phone could display it for you in a way you like .
From an informational perspective it would uniquely useful , i.e .
stand at a bus stop and get an up-to-date timetable " bus 483 is running 10 minutes behind schedule " .. Add a few standards to it all and it would really shape our lives in many ways.I do agree with him when he talks about the " dull pc roadmap " ( 4 to 8 to 16 cores , etc ) , and i think ARM ( heh , theres a pun there somewhere - get an arm on your wrist or something ) may in the future have a fair bit to say about it.But then again , im longing for the Peter F Hamilton experience... I want my affinity gene ( and all this wonderful other ideas in the commonwealth/confederation books ) !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As others have pointed out, i think it'll move to the optical.
Glasses you wear that have a screen in them... and given where e-ink is going that may not be too far away.
Thats not to say the wrist wouldnt be in use, after all if you no longer need a display, a mobile phone could take on a much different (wrist-wrapping) form factor.But i also believe one area that mostly goes untouched is proximity type computing.
I.e. I sit down at the "computer" at work and im in close enough proximity that the glasses display something related to that.
Theres a whole range of things that could be done in the proximity range... for example removing those clumsy lcd/led displays on appliances at home and have a proximity thing in your mobile phone (hey, you carry it with you everywhere anyways).
Similar to bluetooth but without all the authentication (though based more on mutual induction then actual radio waves as such), who cares if someone can walk up to your microwave and use it with their own mobile phone.
Thats not to say auth wouldnt be required (a-lah work computer would require it), but pairing things is a pain when its just something simple.It'd be nice to abstract information from everything into a format that suited myself, rather then the other way around... What I mean is that your microwave could send your phone the parameters it needs to operate it and your phone could display it for you in a way you like.
From an informational perspective it would uniquely useful, i.e.
stand at a bus stop and get an up-to-date timetable "bus 483 is running 10 minutes behind schedule".. Add a few standards to it all and it would really shape our lives in many ways.I do agree with him when he talks about the "dull pc roadmap" (4 to 8 to 16 cores, etc), and i think ARM (heh, theres a pun there somewhere - get an arm on your wrist or something) may in the future have a fair bit to say about it.But then again, im longing for the Peter F Hamilton experience... I want my affinity gene (and all this wonderful other ideas in the commonwealth/confederation books)!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849442</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1264104720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i remember that kid</p><p>he would type "dolly parton is 5'5" (55) and her chest size is 37 (37) and she weighs 80 pounds (80). if she lost 8 pounds (08) she would be"</p><p>and then he would hold his wrist upside down and 55378008 becomes "BOOBLESS"</p><p>this was the very height of witty reparte in the 6th grade</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i remember that kidhe would type " dolly parton is 5'5 " ( 55 ) and her chest size is 37 ( 37 ) and she weighs 80 pounds ( 80 ) .
if she lost 8 pounds ( 08 ) she would be " and then he would hold his wrist upside down and 55378008 becomes " BOOBLESS " this was the very height of witty reparte in the 6th grade</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i remember that kidhe would type "dolly parton is 5'5" (55) and her chest size is 37 (37) and she weighs 80 pounds (80).
if she lost 8 pounds (08) she would be"and then he would hold his wrist upside down and 55378008 becomes "BOOBLESS"this was the very height of witty reparte in the 6th grade</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848634</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264101060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah, because we all know how easy it is to use a 1"x1" oval viewing screen strapped to your wrist, to view large PDF attachments, for example.</p></div><p>True story.  At keynote session at Microsoft's TechEd conference in Europe a few years ago they were demoing the (then new) Windows on mobile devices.</p><p>The presenter showed Excel running on a mobile phone.  But all you could see was cell "A1" of the spreadsheet.  Running yes, usable no.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , because we all know how easy it is to use a 1 " x1 " oval viewing screen strapped to your wrist , to view large PDF attachments , for example.True story .
At keynote session at Microsoft 's TechEd conference in Europe a few years ago they were demoing the ( then new ) Windows on mobile devices.The presenter showed Excel running on a mobile phone .
But all you could see was cell " A1 " of the spreadsheet .
Running yes , usable no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, because we all know how easy it is to use a 1"x1" oval viewing screen strapped to your wrist, to view large PDF attachments, for example.True story.
At keynote session at Microsoft's TechEd conference in Europe a few years ago they were demoing the (then new) Windows on mobile devices.The presenter showed Excel running on a mobile phone.
But all you could see was cell "A1" of the spreadsheet.
Running yes, usable no.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847934</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>TheLink</author>
	<datestamp>1264098060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Currently there's tech that:<br><br>1) allows the blind to see - but with crappy resolution. Also do a search for "seeing tongue" - seeing is in the mind.<br>2) allows paralyzed people to control devices with their thoughts.<br><br>So if tech improves, the screen will be in your head. And the keyboard too.<br><br>No need to waste energy on backlights.<br><br>Add wireless tech and some "software glue", and you'd have virtual telepathy and virtual telekinesis.<br><br>The real problem is Copyright Law and DRM. The laws and DRM systems might prevent you from recalling videos you record (as you walk in a mall that has copyrighted background music) or limit you to limited plays per pay...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Currently there 's tech that : 1 ) allows the blind to see - but with crappy resolution .
Also do a search for " seeing tongue " - seeing is in the mind.2 ) allows paralyzed people to control devices with their thoughts.So if tech improves , the screen will be in your head .
And the keyboard too.No need to waste energy on backlights.Add wireless tech and some " software glue " , and you 'd have virtual telepathy and virtual telekinesis.The real problem is Copyright Law and DRM .
The laws and DRM systems might prevent you from recalling videos you record ( as you walk in a mall that has copyrighted background music ) or limit you to limited plays per pay.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Currently there's tech that:1) allows the blind to see - but with crappy resolution.
Also do a search for "seeing tongue" - seeing is in the mind.2) allows paralyzed people to control devices with their thoughts.So if tech improves, the screen will be in your head.
And the keyboard too.No need to waste energy on backlights.Add wireless tech and some "software glue", and you'd have virtual telepathy and virtual telekinesis.The real problem is Copyright Law and DRM.
The laws and DRM systems might prevent you from recalling videos you record (as you walk in a mall that has copyrighted background music) or limit you to limited plays per pay...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848948</id>
	<title>Re:History of computing paradigms</title>
	<author>CliffH</author>
	<datestamp>1264102620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've always had a fond place in my heart for <a href="http://pocketcalculatorshow.com/nerdwatch/fun2.html" title="pocketcalculatorshow.com">this</a> [pocketcalculatorshow.com] little gem. My dad still has one which I believe he bought at CES way back when. BTW, it's the Data-2000 from 1983. You could program on it and he had a printer for it. Next time he offers it to me I think I'll accept it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always had a fond place in my heart for this [ pocketcalculatorshow.com ] little gem .
My dad still has one which I believe he bought at CES way back when .
BTW , it 's the Data-2000 from 1983 .
You could program on it and he had a printer for it .
Next time he offers it to me I think I 'll accept it : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always had a fond place in my heart for this [pocketcalculatorshow.com] little gem.
My dad still has one which I believe he bought at CES way back when.
BTW, it's the Data-2000 from 1983.
You could program on it and he had a printer for it.
Next time he offers it to me I think I'll accept it :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847784</id>
	<title>great!</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1264097400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can wear it as I commute with my personal electric flying machine to my shiny new, high paying "Green" career.</p><p>Are the editors working from the Gernsback continuum today?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can wear it as I commute with my personal electric flying machine to my shiny new , high paying " Green " career.Are the editors working from the Gernsback continuum today ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can wear it as I commute with my personal electric flying machine to my shiny new, high paying "Green" career.Are the editors working from the Gernsback continuum today?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849288</id>
	<title>Bracelet</title>
	<author>Antiocheian</author>
	<datestamp>1264104120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just tailor a nice leather bracelet and put your mobile phone there. Problem solved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just tailor a nice leather bracelet and put your mobile phone there .
Problem solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just tailor a nice leather bracelet and put your mobile phone there.
Problem solved.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847958</id>
	<title>Pip Boy 3000</title>
	<author>extremescholar</author>
	<datestamp>1264098180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know Fallout 3 and the Pip Boy isn't a bad idea.  Imagine a PDA/cell phone on the wrist.  I like the idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know Fallout 3 and the Pip Boy is n't a bad idea .
Imagine a PDA/cell phone on the wrist .
I like the idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know Fallout 3 and the Pip Boy isn't a bad idea.
Imagine a PDA/cell phone on the wrist.
I like the idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849204</id>
	<title>Re:History of computing paradigms</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264103760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've never understood why there are no good examples of extremely short-range terminals in mobile computing.  For example, a laptop-sized main computer in your backpack (probably an actual laptop, really) connected via either a cable or high-bandwidth wireless to something that is literally just a display and keyboard (and battery) -- No guts, no heat, no awkward/stupid limitations.  If you need a different size terminal, you get a different sized terminal.  The computer itself, while it will run on batteries, doesn't necessarily require that the battery fit in the form factor of the rest of the device, so you have significantly more juice.</p><p>A wireless monitor on your wrist makes plenty of sense in that context, as long as you understand that it will only ever be an accessory, not a full-fledged terminal or PDA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never understood why there are no good examples of extremely short-range terminals in mobile computing .
For example , a laptop-sized main computer in your backpack ( probably an actual laptop , really ) connected via either a cable or high-bandwidth wireless to something that is literally just a display and keyboard ( and battery ) -- No guts , no heat , no awkward/stupid limitations .
If you need a different size terminal , you get a different sized terminal .
The computer itself , while it will run on batteries , does n't necessarily require that the battery fit in the form factor of the rest of the device , so you have significantly more juice.A wireless monitor on your wrist makes plenty of sense in that context , as long as you understand that it will only ever be an accessory , not a full-fledged terminal or PDA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never understood why there are no good examples of extremely short-range terminals in mobile computing.
For example, a laptop-sized main computer in your backpack (probably an actual laptop, really) connected via either a cable or high-bandwidth wireless to something that is literally just a display and keyboard (and battery) -- No guts, no heat, no awkward/stupid limitations.
If you need a different size terminal, you get a different sized terminal.
The computer itself, while it will run on batteries, doesn't necessarily require that the battery fit in the form factor of the rest of the device, so you have significantly more juice.A wireless monitor on your wrist makes plenty of sense in that context, as long as you understand that it will only ever be an accessory, not a full-fledged terminal or PDA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849112</id>
	<title>Re:Point of order....</title>
	<author>Tikkun</author>
	<datestamp>1264103280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When my friends hangout at our apartment, we all bring our laptops.</p></div><p>What are these "<i>friends</i>" you speak of?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When my friends hangout at our apartment , we all bring our laptops.What are these " friends " you speak of ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When my friends hangout at our apartment, we all bring our laptops.What are these "friends" you speak of?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848220</id>
	<title>Expains current motherboard blandness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264099200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I miss the days when I eagerly awaited the latest Asus motherboard offerings. Sounds like they've lost the will to lead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I miss the days when I eagerly awaited the latest Asus motherboard offerings .
Sounds like they 've lost the will to lead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I miss the days when I eagerly awaited the latest Asus motherboard offerings.
Sounds like they've lost the will to lead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849214</id>
	<title>Only go so small...</title>
	<author>Chicken04GTO</author>
	<datestamp>1264103820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Until it can project the screen onto my eye, and I can interface with it virtually, the smallest a computer can be and still be useful is a good sized screen 10" ?  - and a keyboard with reasonably sized keys.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Until it can project the screen onto my eye , and I can interface with it virtually , the smallest a computer can be and still be useful is a good sized screen 10 " ?
- and a keyboard with reasonably sized keys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until it can project the screen onto my eye, and I can interface with it virtually, the smallest a computer can be and still be useful is a good sized screen 10" ?
- and a keyboard with reasonably sized keys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848460</id>
	<title>They are so desperate to shake off the netbook...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264100280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>...because they can't make any money on them, that they'd actually bring up the wearable computer thing again.  Well, it kinda makes sense.  You can charge a whole lot more margin for a wearable computer than you can for a low end, tiny laptop.  But I thought we've been over this before.  Wearable computers are only for dorks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...because they ca n't make any money on them , that they 'd actually bring up the wearable computer thing again .
Well , it kinda makes sense .
You can charge a whole lot more margin for a wearable computer than you can for a low end , tiny laptop .
But I thought we 've been over this before .
Wearable computers are only for dorks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...because they can't make any money on them, that they'd actually bring up the wearable computer thing again.
Well, it kinda makes sense.
You can charge a whole lot more margin for a wearable computer than you can for a low end, tiny laptop.
But I thought we've been over this before.
Wearable computers are only for dorks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30855692</id>
	<title>IO devices</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1264089000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The wii have all kind of "joysticks", some generic, other that fits better in one or another kind of games, but the computer is still a box hidden somewhere. Wearable computing should go after that idea. The main box in your backpack/pocket/necklace/whatever, and wireless (bluetooth or other tech) "pluggable" IO devices, that can show information and/oir receive input. So you can have a wristwatch touchscreen, display glasses, smart clothes. "Sixth Sense" wearable devices or even plain keyboard/monitors if you want.<br><br>Anyway, for that will take more than 5 years to get to an usable and widely available implementation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The wii have all kind of " joysticks " , some generic , other that fits better in one or another kind of games , but the computer is still a box hidden somewhere .
Wearable computing should go after that idea .
The main box in your backpack/pocket/necklace/whatever , and wireless ( bluetooth or other tech ) " pluggable " IO devices , that can show information and/oir receive input .
So you can have a wristwatch touchscreen , display glasses , smart clothes .
" Sixth Sense " wearable devices or even plain keyboard/monitors if you want.Anyway , for that will take more than 5 years to get to an usable and widely available implementation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The wii have all kind of "joysticks", some generic, other that fits better in one or another kind of games, but the computer is still a box hidden somewhere.
Wearable computing should go after that idea.
The main box in your backpack/pocket/necklace/whatever, and wireless (bluetooth or other tech) "pluggable" IO devices, that can show information and/oir receive input.
So you can have a wristwatch touchscreen, display glasses, smart clothes.
"Sixth Sense" wearable devices or even plain keyboard/monitors if you want.Anyway, for that will take more than 5 years to get to an usable and widely available implementation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848824</id>
	<title>Re:Point of order....</title>
	<author>religious freak</author>
	<datestamp>1264102020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unless the cycle time of disruptive innovation is shortening...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless the cycle time of disruptive innovation is shortening.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless the cycle time of disruptive innovation is shortening...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849238</id>
	<title>Re:To Infinite... And Beyond!</title>
	<author>jank1887</author>
	<datestamp>1264103940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>Is it the future already?</em></p><p>Yes...</p><p>Yes again...</p><p>Yes again...</p><p>Yes again...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it the future already ? Yes...Yes again...Yes again...Yes again... .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it the future already?Yes...Yes again...Yes again...Yes again... ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847736</id>
	<title>Dead already?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264097220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really? I thought the point of the article was that its death was inevitable, and that wearable computers are the future. How does that translate to "Netbooks are dead already"?</p><p>But hey, if you filter out editorial stupidity from slashdot we will have only one or two "news" every week or so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
I thought the point of the article was that its death was inevitable , and that wearable computers are the future .
How does that translate to " Netbooks are dead already " ? But hey , if you filter out editorial stupidity from slashdot we will have only one or two " news " every week or so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
I thought the point of the article was that its death was inevitable, and that wearable computers are the future.
How does that translate to "Netbooks are dead already"?But hey, if you filter out editorial stupidity from slashdot we will have only one or two "news" every week or so.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848162</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1264099020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The tech is going to have to be pretty amazing if you want me to stop using my retina. And I don't have particularly good optics in front of my retinas (I'm right on the edge of needing correction to drive, but not over the edge yet).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The tech is going to have to be pretty amazing if you want me to stop using my retina .
And I do n't have particularly good optics in front of my retinas ( I 'm right on the edge of needing correction to drive , but not over the edge yet ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The tech is going to have to be pretty amazing if you want me to stop using my retina.
And I don't have particularly good optics in front of my retinas (I'm right on the edge of needing correction to drive, but not over the edge yet).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848504</id>
	<title>Re:eeh...</title>
	<author>91degrees</author>
	<datestamp>1264100460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, you might be able to squeeze a laser projector down to size.  And there are projection based keyboards, so it's just the power issue to deal with.  <br> <br>
Do you think people might be persuaded to lug a car battery around on a trolley?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , you might be able to squeeze a laser projector down to size .
And there are projection based keyboards , so it 's just the power issue to deal with .
Do you think people might be persuaded to lug a car battery around on a trolley ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, you might be able to squeeze a laser projector down to size.
And there are projection based keyboards, so it's just the power issue to deal with.
Do you think people might be persuaded to lug a car battery around on a trolley?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30854156</id>
	<title>Re:The way I see it...</title>
	<author>Quabbe</author>
	<datestamp>1264078080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry to laugh, but you wear your mobile phone on your BELT?!? that is soooo mid '90s. Seriously though, in Australia that concept went out the door back in '94/'95. Is that still the done thing where you're from? In the late 90's it was considered pretentious, and by the '00 was associated with the likes of pocket protectors...

We wear our phones in our pockets. Pockets are where the futuer's at my friend!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry to laugh , but you wear your mobile phone on your BELT ? ! ?
that is soooo mid '90s .
Seriously though , in Australia that concept went out the door back in '94/'95 .
Is that still the done thing where you 're from ?
In the late 90 's it was considered pretentious , and by the '00 was associated with the likes of pocket protectors.. . We wear our phones in our pockets .
Pockets are where the futuer 's at my friend !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry to laugh, but you wear your mobile phone on your BELT?!?
that is soooo mid '90s.
Seriously though, in Australia that concept went out the door back in '94/'95.
Is that still the done thing where you're from?
In the late 90's it was considered pretentious, and by the '00 was associated with the likes of pocket protectors...

We wear our phones in our pockets.
Pockets are where the futuer's at my friend!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849438</id>
	<title>Vendors: Netbooks "dying, honest"</title>
	<author>David Gerard</author>
	<datestamp>1264104660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Cheap netbooks are too limited and no-one will want them any more, say vendors who wish they still made a profit at the mere 103\% increase in netbook sales in 2009 over 2008.</p><p>The small, portable computers sold in stupendous numbers in 2009, but industry watchers have been convinced by Microsoft and Intel to say that their popularity is waning. "No-one is buying a 10-inch netbook that costs &pound;500 and runs Windows 7," said Stuart Miles of Pocket Unit. "So everyone will go back to expensive iPhones and full-sized laptops, any day now. This 'internet' thing is just a fad too."</p><p>What people are looking for now, he believes, is a machine that can keep up with the demands of contemporary web users. A small netbook running Windows 7 Dumbass Edition(tm), which runs up to three applications at a time and holds your data hostage until you cough up eighty quid to run a fourth, is "thoroughly inadequate" to the task. "Linux, of course, doesn't exist, wasn't the impetus for cheap netbooks and didn't cripple Microsoft's bottom line for the last three years by providing actual competition for the first time in decades. So it's not like it can do twice as much in half the space."</p><p>Ian Drew, spokesman for chip designer ARM Holdings, also believes netbooks are in for a shake-up. "Apparently, netbooks that weigh nothing, run twice as fast and have an all-day battery but don't run Windows are a problem for ARM, not for Microsoft," he said, lighting a cigar off a fifty-pound note.</p><p>Mr Miles believes tablets will take up the mantle from the netbook. "If we carefully define tablets as 'not netbooks,' even though they're made by the same companies with the same technology running the same software, we can claim the netbook is dead even though people are suddenly realising how stupidly huge, unwieldy and heavy even a fourteen-inch laptop is. It's all about picking your terms rather than, <i>e.g.</i>, selling what people actually want instead of what you'd like them to want. Also, if you whack in a 3G modem it's suddenly a phone instead, and never mind the Mini 9."</p><p>"Clap your hands if you don't believe in netbooks," said Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer. "Marketers! Marketers! Marketers! Marketers!"</p><p> <i>Illustration:</i> The <a href="http://newstechnica.com/2010/01/03/vendors-netbooks-dying-honest/" title="newstechnica.com">1982 netbook</a> [newstechnica.com]. Go anywhere! Do anything!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cheap netbooks are too limited and no-one will want them any more , say vendors who wish they still made a profit at the mere 103 \ % increase in netbook sales in 2009 over 2008.The small , portable computers sold in stupendous numbers in 2009 , but industry watchers have been convinced by Microsoft and Intel to say that their popularity is waning .
" No-one is buying a 10-inch netbook that costs   500 and runs Windows 7 , " said Stuart Miles of Pocket Unit .
" So everyone will go back to expensive iPhones and full-sized laptops , any day now .
This 'internet ' thing is just a fad too .
" What people are looking for now , he believes , is a machine that can keep up with the demands of contemporary web users .
A small netbook running Windows 7 Dumbass Edition ( tm ) , which runs up to three applications at a time and holds your data hostage until you cough up eighty quid to run a fourth , is " thoroughly inadequate " to the task .
" Linux , of course , does n't exist , was n't the impetus for cheap netbooks and did n't cripple Microsoft 's bottom line for the last three years by providing actual competition for the first time in decades .
So it 's not like it can do twice as much in half the space .
" Ian Drew , spokesman for chip designer ARM Holdings , also believes netbooks are in for a shake-up .
" Apparently , netbooks that weigh nothing , run twice as fast and have an all-day battery but do n't run Windows are a problem for ARM , not for Microsoft , " he said , lighting a cigar off a fifty-pound note.Mr Miles believes tablets will take up the mantle from the netbook .
" If we carefully define tablets as 'not netbooks, ' even though they 're made by the same companies with the same technology running the same software , we can claim the netbook is dead even though people are suddenly realising how stupidly huge , unwieldy and heavy even a fourteen-inch laptop is .
It 's all about picking your terms rather than , e.g. , selling what people actually want instead of what you 'd like them to want .
Also , if you whack in a 3G modem it 's suddenly a phone instead , and never mind the Mini 9 .
" " Clap your hands if you do n't believe in netbooks , " said Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer .
" Marketers ! Marketers !
Marketers ! Marketers !
" Illustration : The 1982 netbook [ newstechnica.com ] .
Go anywhere !
Do anything !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Cheap netbooks are too limited and no-one will want them any more, say vendors who wish they still made a profit at the mere 103\% increase in netbook sales in 2009 over 2008.The small, portable computers sold in stupendous numbers in 2009, but industry watchers have been convinced by Microsoft and Intel to say that their popularity is waning.
"No-one is buying a 10-inch netbook that costs £500 and runs Windows 7," said Stuart Miles of Pocket Unit.
"So everyone will go back to expensive iPhones and full-sized laptops, any day now.
This 'internet' thing is just a fad too.
"What people are looking for now, he believes, is a machine that can keep up with the demands of contemporary web users.
A small netbook running Windows 7 Dumbass Edition(tm), which runs up to three applications at a time and holds your data hostage until you cough up eighty quid to run a fourth, is "thoroughly inadequate" to the task.
"Linux, of course, doesn't exist, wasn't the impetus for cheap netbooks and didn't cripple Microsoft's bottom line for the last three years by providing actual competition for the first time in decades.
So it's not like it can do twice as much in half the space.
"Ian Drew, spokesman for chip designer ARM Holdings, also believes netbooks are in for a shake-up.
"Apparently, netbooks that weigh nothing, run twice as fast and have an all-day battery but don't run Windows are a problem for ARM, not for Microsoft," he said, lighting a cigar off a fifty-pound note.Mr Miles believes tablets will take up the mantle from the netbook.
"If we carefully define tablets as 'not netbooks,' even though they're made by the same companies with the same technology running the same software, we can claim the netbook is dead even though people are suddenly realising how stupidly huge, unwieldy and heavy even a fourteen-inch laptop is.
It's all about picking your terms rather than, e.g., selling what people actually want instead of what you'd like them to want.
Also, if you whack in a 3G modem it's suddenly a phone instead, and never mind the Mini 9.
""Clap your hands if you don't believe in netbooks," said Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer.
"Marketers! Marketers!
Marketers! Marketers!
" Illustration: The 1982 netbook [newstechnica.com].
Go anywhere!
Do anything!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848186</id>
	<title>Until..</title>
	<author>Thyamine</author>
	<datestamp>1264099080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Until I can have Cortana on my wrist, I don't see how something that small will be able to interface with a person well.  Maybe some super-interface is on the horizon, but at this point it would need to almost have some type of AI to interface with that could do the typing/processing/etc that I'd need.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Until I can have Cortana on my wrist , I do n't see how something that small will be able to interface with a person well .
Maybe some super-interface is on the horizon , but at this point it would need to almost have some type of AI to interface with that could do the typing/processing/etc that I 'd need .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until I can have Cortana on my wrist, I don't see how something that small will be able to interface with a person well.
Maybe some super-interface is on the horizon, but at this point it would need to almost have some type of AI to interface with that could do the typing/processing/etc that I'd need.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848172</id>
	<title>Re:eeh...</title>
	<author>compro01</author>
	<datestamp>1264099020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just because the processing/storage hardware is in the watch doesn't mean the display and input device has to be.</p><p>Though their concept device looks to have about as much screen real estate as any current touch smartphone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because the processing/storage hardware is in the watch does n't mean the display and input device has to be.Though their concept device looks to have about as much screen real estate as any current touch smartphone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because the processing/storage hardware is in the watch doesn't mean the display and input device has to be.Though their concept device looks to have about as much screen real estate as any current touch smartphone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30854742</id>
	<title>Re:Not on my wrist</title>
	<author>CityZen</author>
	<datestamp>1264081320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tried not wearing my watch for a while.  I was fine for a few months, until I started making some airline trips.  I didn't like being unable to tell the time during various parts of the flights.</p><p>I'm back to wearing my watch again.  It's more convenient than pulling my phone out of my pocket, and its battery has regularly lasted more than 10 years each time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried not wearing my watch for a while .
I was fine for a few months , until I started making some airline trips .
I did n't like being unable to tell the time during various parts of the flights.I 'm back to wearing my watch again .
It 's more convenient than pulling my phone out of my pocket , and its battery has regularly lasted more than 10 years each time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried not wearing my watch for a while.
I was fine for a few months, until I started making some airline trips.
I didn't like being unable to tell the time during various parts of the flights.I'm back to wearing my watch again.
It's more convenient than pulling my phone out of my pocket, and its battery has regularly lasted more than 10 years each time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848962</id>
	<title>Dick Tracy</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1264102680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>A dupe from Dick Tracy, that is.<br>This "wearable computer" crap comes along every 5 years. It's still the epitome of lame, even by slashdot standards.<br>
&nbsp; </i></p><p>I think that depends on how you define its purpose:</p><p> <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070717014352.htm" title="sciencedaily.com">SMS Your ECG To ER: Portable Heart Monitor Sends Emergency Alerts And ECG As Text Message</a> [sciencedaily.com] </p><p>It isn't difficult to imagine remote medical monitoring and assitive tech becoming the norm for the patient at risk, the chronically ill and elderly.</p><p>There is something to be said for the gadget that doesn't need a pocket or purse, that fades into invisibility.</p><p>In response to a similar story, a poster remarked that a wrist watch is one of the few pieces of jewelry a man can wear without embarrassment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A dupe from Dick Tracy , that is.This " wearable computer " crap comes along every 5 years .
It 's still the epitome of lame , even by slashdot standards .
  I think that depends on how you define its purpose : SMS Your ECG To ER : Portable Heart Monitor Sends Emergency Alerts And ECG As Text Message [ sciencedaily.com ] It is n't difficult to imagine remote medical monitoring and assitive tech becoming the norm for the patient at risk , the chronically ill and elderly.There is something to be said for the gadget that does n't need a pocket or purse , that fades into invisibility.In response to a similar story , a poster remarked that a wrist watch is one of the few pieces of jewelry a man can wear without embarrassment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A dupe from Dick Tracy, that is.This "wearable computer" crap comes along every 5 years.
It's still the epitome of lame, even by slashdot standards.
  I think that depends on how you define its purpose: SMS Your ECG To ER: Portable Heart Monitor Sends Emergency Alerts And ECG As Text Message [sciencedaily.com] It isn't difficult to imagine remote medical monitoring and assitive tech becoming the norm for the patient at risk, the chronically ill and elderly.There is something to be said for the gadget that doesn't need a pocket or purse, that fades into invisibility.In response to a similar story, a poster remarked that a wrist watch is one of the few pieces of jewelry a man can wear without embarrassment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847890</id>
	<title>For everyone who's seen the movie "Predator"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264097820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That kind of wearable computer would be pretty cool. Make it a touchscreen, and add in some kind of adjustable/inflatable cushioning between the inner shell and the user's forearm so wearers can adjust for fit and comfort. But don't add the nuke (of course).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That kind of wearable computer would be pretty cool .
Make it a touchscreen , and add in some kind of adjustable/inflatable cushioning between the inner shell and the user 's forearm so wearers can adjust for fit and comfort .
But do n't add the nuke ( of course ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That kind of wearable computer would be pretty cool.
Make it a touchscreen, and add in some kind of adjustable/inflatable cushioning between the inner shell and the user's forearm so wearers can adjust for fit and comfort.
But don't add the nuke (of course).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849524</id>
	<title>Re:Point of order....</title>
	<author>Fujisawa Sensei</author>
	<datestamp>1264105020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Reading the article (yeah yeah), he says nothing about the netbook being "dead" or even declining. Just your standard Slashdot editorial slant -- fabricating a headline out of thin air.</p></div><p>That's not thin air, that's a methane releasing orifice.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reading the article ( yeah yeah ) , he says nothing about the netbook being " dead " or even declining .
Just your standard Slashdot editorial slant -- fabricating a headline out of thin air.That 's not thin air , that 's a methane releasing orifice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reading the article (yeah yeah), he says nothing about the netbook being "dead" or even declining.
Just your standard Slashdot editorial slant -- fabricating a headline out of thin air.That's not thin air, that's a methane releasing orifice.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30854070</id>
	<title>Errr....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264077720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if I don't wear a watch?</p><p>If I did though, can I get a Power Rangers one?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if I do n't wear a watch ? If I did though , can I get a Power Rangers one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if I don't wear a watch?If I did though, can I get a Power Rangers one?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848010</id>
	<title>Good article, and IMHO good predictions</title>
	<author>MarkWatson</author>
	<datestamp>1264098420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that the prediction that there needs to be more content before mass market success of tablets is right on.</p><p>At breakfast this morning, one of my non-tech friends was talking about the TED talk on wearable computers where spacial glasses would create virtual keyboards and displays on walls, tables, etc. That is what I would to see available soon<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p><p>For now, the Android platform is looking good: easy to develop apps for, mobile devices support voice commands, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that the prediction that there needs to be more content before mass market success of tablets is right on.At breakfast this morning , one of my non-tech friends was talking about the TED talk on wearable computers where spacial glasses would create virtual keyboards and displays on walls , tables , etc .
That is what I would to see available soon : - ) For now , the Android platform is looking good : easy to develop apps for , mobile devices support voice commands , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that the prediction that there needs to be more content before mass market success of tablets is right on.At breakfast this morning, one of my non-tech friends was talking about the TED talk on wearable computers where spacial glasses would create virtual keyboards and displays on walls, tables, etc.
That is what I would to see available soon :-)For now, the Android platform is looking good: easy to develop apps for, mobile devices support voice commands, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849672</id>
	<title>form factor keeps changing - the end is?</title>
	<author>Onymous Coward</author>
	<datestamp>1264105680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Local computing power is wearable already in the form of phones.  (Which keep getting more powerful.)</p><p>Eventually there'll be convenient video through glasses.  You won't need an additional device like a phone.</p><p>Maybe you'll have something like a Bluetooth earbud, or maybe audio will come through glasses arms (transduction or buds).</p><p>Maybe an input device for a while.  Or maybe straight to gestures in air or on handy surfaces.</p><p>Ultimately, <em>just glasses</em>.  And that vision, if you will, is not far.  I give it <em>10 years</em>.</p><p>Eventually, contact lenses, maybe another 15 years after the above scenario.</p><p>Note that it's all a trend towards being borg.</p><p>All hail the prophet <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve\_Mann" title="wikipedia.org">Steve Mann</a> [wikipedia.org]!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Local computing power is wearable already in the form of phones .
( Which keep getting more powerful .
) Eventually there 'll be convenient video through glasses .
You wo n't need an additional device like a phone.Maybe you 'll have something like a Bluetooth earbud , or maybe audio will come through glasses arms ( transduction or buds ) .Maybe an input device for a while .
Or maybe straight to gestures in air or on handy surfaces.Ultimately , just glasses .
And that vision , if you will , is not far .
I give it 10 years.Eventually , contact lenses , maybe another 15 years after the above scenario.Note that it 's all a trend towards being borg.All hail the prophet Steve Mann [ wikipedia.org ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Local computing power is wearable already in the form of phones.
(Which keep getting more powerful.
)Eventually there'll be convenient video through glasses.
You won't need an additional device like a phone.Maybe you'll have something like a Bluetooth earbud, or maybe audio will come through glasses arms (transduction or buds).Maybe an input device for a while.
Or maybe straight to gestures in air or on handy surfaces.Ultimately, just glasses.
And that vision, if you will, is not far.
I give it 10 years.Eventually, contact lenses, maybe another 15 years after the above scenario.Note that it's all a trend towards being borg.All hail the prophet Steve Mann [wikipedia.org]!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847926</id>
	<title>Looks like a melted iPhone</title>
	<author>Scott64</author>
	<datestamp>1264098000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't see myself ever wearing or wanting something like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't see myself ever wearing or wanting something like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't see myself ever wearing or wanting something like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848202</id>
	<title>Not on my wrist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264099140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The last thing I wore around my wrist was (surprise) a clock some 20 years ago. I started having clocks all around me on computer screens at that time so I discovered I had no reason to wear one myself. Then came mobile phones. After all that time I can't stand having something around my wrist anymore.
I have a clock for when I go hiking on the mountains but I strap it on the backpack. It's much more comfortable that way.
Thinking about this Asus product, it may even sell well but I'd always go for something that can fit in my pocket and that's my mobile phone. I could call it a camera that makes calls and runs programs, or a computer with a phone and a camera but there is a limit to the number of devices we can carry around and recharge at home. No need for another one and no need to wear it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The last thing I wore around my wrist was ( surprise ) a clock some 20 years ago .
I started having clocks all around me on computer screens at that time so I discovered I had no reason to wear one myself .
Then came mobile phones .
After all that time I ca n't stand having something around my wrist anymore .
I have a clock for when I go hiking on the mountains but I strap it on the backpack .
It 's much more comfortable that way .
Thinking about this Asus product , it may even sell well but I 'd always go for something that can fit in my pocket and that 's my mobile phone .
I could call it a camera that makes calls and runs programs , or a computer with a phone and a camera but there is a limit to the number of devices we can carry around and recharge at home .
No need for another one and no need to wear it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The last thing I wore around my wrist was (surprise) a clock some 20 years ago.
I started having clocks all around me on computer screens at that time so I discovered I had no reason to wear one myself.
Then came mobile phones.
After all that time I can't stand having something around my wrist anymore.
I have a clock for when I go hiking on the mountains but I strap it on the backpack.
It's much more comfortable that way.
Thinking about this Asus product, it may even sell well but I'd always go for something that can fit in my pocket and that's my mobile phone.
I could call it a camera that makes calls and runs programs, or a computer with a phone and a camera but there is a limit to the number of devices we can carry around and recharge at home.
No need for another one and no need to wear it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848374</id>
	<title>Re:Point of order....</title>
	<author>Jeff DeMaagd</author>
	<datestamp>1264099860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Besides, the origin of netbooks is varied and fuzzy that "pioneer" is a worthless or contestable claim anyways.</p><p>It's nice that they're trying something different.  But their vision of a replacement is not likely to succeed, you only need to look at the long history of palm top/ultraportable/netbook/UMPC style computers that were interesting but failed to take the market beyond a niche.  Claims of the death of an existing technology from anyone with vested interest its supposed replacement must be taken with a grain of salt, or just flatly ignored, because it's usually just PR.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Besides , the origin of netbooks is varied and fuzzy that " pioneer " is a worthless or contestable claim anyways.It 's nice that they 're trying something different .
But their vision of a replacement is not likely to succeed , you only need to look at the long history of palm top/ultraportable/netbook/UMPC style computers that were interesting but failed to take the market beyond a niche .
Claims of the death of an existing technology from anyone with vested interest its supposed replacement must be taken with a grain of salt , or just flatly ignored , because it 's usually just PR .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Besides, the origin of netbooks is varied and fuzzy that "pioneer" is a worthless or contestable claim anyways.It's nice that they're trying something different.
But their vision of a replacement is not likely to succeed, you only need to look at the long history of palm top/ultraportable/netbook/UMPC style computers that were interesting but failed to take the market beyond a niche.
Claims of the death of an existing technology from anyone with vested interest its supposed replacement must be taken with a grain of salt, or just flatly ignored, because it's usually just PR.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849128</id>
	<title>TI-89 and TI-nspire</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1264103400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Do you: -want to design anything on anything but a desktop?</p></div><p>Stylus-based PDAs are decent for sketching things while away from your expensive graphics tablet. In fact, some people have even pressed Nintendo DS systems into use as a makeshift Cintiq clone.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>-want to use mathematica on a phone?</p></div><p>Texas Instruments used to a computer algebra system called Derive. It forms the basis of the CAS in TI-89 and TI-nspire calculators. So yes, a lot of people do use a system that could be compared to a scaled-down Mathematica on a handheld device.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you : -want to design anything on anything but a desktop ? Stylus-based PDAs are decent for sketching things while away from your expensive graphics tablet .
In fact , some people have even pressed Nintendo DS systems into use as a makeshift Cintiq clone.-want to use mathematica on a phone ? Texas Instruments used to a computer algebra system called Derive .
It forms the basis of the CAS in TI-89 and TI-nspire calculators .
So yes , a lot of people do use a system that could be compared to a scaled-down Mathematica on a handheld device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you: -want to design anything on anything but a desktop?Stylus-based PDAs are decent for sketching things while away from your expensive graphics tablet.
In fact, some people have even pressed Nintendo DS systems into use as a makeshift Cintiq clone.-want to use mathematica on a phone?Texas Instruments used to a computer algebra system called Derive.
It forms the basis of the CAS in TI-89 and TI-nspire calculators.
So yes, a lot of people do use a system that could be compared to a scaled-down Mathematica on a handheld device.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30851022</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>roc97007</author>
	<datestamp>1264067580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Insightful and darned funny.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Insightful and darned funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Insightful and darned funny.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848792</id>
	<title>Perhaps... but now without VRD</title>
	<author>GerardAtJob</author>
	<datestamp>1264101840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps... but now without VRD!<br>Imagine a notebook, and throw away the display.<br>Now strap it in your winter jacket and put a VRD (Virtual Retinal Display) on.</p><p>Now you have a netbook with a 50x50inch display that can interact with the outside world...<br>Ex: Help you repair your car<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A GPS system that show helpful informations directly in your fov<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Help you play virtual battlefield with wooden guns at your favorite parc lol<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; etc...etc...etc...</p><p>BUT it won't happen with a wrist display...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps... but now without VRD ! Imagine a notebook , and throw away the display.Now strap it in your winter jacket and put a VRD ( Virtual Retinal Display ) on.Now you have a netbook with a 50x50inch display that can interact with the outside world...Ex : Help you repair your car         A GPS system that show helpful informations directly in your fov         Help you play virtual battlefield with wooden guns at your favorite parc lol         etc...etc...etc...BUT it wo n't happen with a wrist display.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps... but now without VRD!Imagine a notebook, and throw away the display.Now strap it in your winter jacket and put a VRD (Virtual Retinal Display) on.Now you have a netbook with a 50x50inch display that can interact with the outside world...Ex: Help you repair your car
        A GPS system that show helpful informations directly in your fov
        Help you play virtual battlefield with wooden guns at your favorite parc lol
        etc...etc...etc...BUT it won't happen with a wrist display...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848130</id>
	<title>obligatory get off my lawn</title>
	<author>castironpigeon</author>
	<datestamp>1264098960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Back in my day we strapped our TI-82s to our hairy forearms with duct tape and we liked it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Back in my day we strapped our TI-82s to our hairy forearms with duct tape and we liked it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back in my day we strapped our TI-82s to our hairy forearms with duct tape and we liked it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847796</id>
	<title>Pipboy</title>
	<author>Ralz</author>
	<datestamp>1264097460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've always wanted a pipboy on my wrist, FO3 style so I can check if my legs are broken and how many HP I have left. It could certainly come in handy for things like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always wanted a pipboy on my wrist , FO3 style so I can check if my legs are broken and how many HP I have left .
It could certainly come in handy for things like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always wanted a pipboy on my wrist, FO3 style so I can check if my legs are broken and how many HP I have left.
It could certainly come in handy for things like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850356</id>
	<title>Asus and the Death of the Netbook</title>
	<author>hedge49</author>
	<datestamp>1264065240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anybody tried Asus Customer Support lately?  Anybody able to FIND Asus Customer Support?  Seems 'YOYO' to me. (You're On Your Own)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anybody tried Asus Customer Support lately ?
Anybody able to FIND Asus Customer Support ?
Seems 'YOYO ' to me .
( You 're On Your Own )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anybody tried Asus Customer Support lately?
Anybody able to FIND Asus Customer Support?
Seems 'YOYO' to me.
(You're On Your Own)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30855088</id>
	<title>Re:eeh...</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1264084020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Think of it instead as just a portable node in a grid -- it can connect to any other node (including display nodes such as those glasses you're wearing) and draw on their processing power; or it can wokr on its own to deliver reminders and information to you.
<p>
The form factor as we consider it today is pretty limiting, but it doesn't mean that there's no potential there when approached from a different perspective.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of it instead as just a portable node in a grid -- it can connect to any other node ( including display nodes such as those glasses you 're wearing ) and draw on their processing power ; or it can wokr on its own to deliver reminders and information to you .
The form factor as we consider it today is pretty limiting , but it does n't mean that there 's no potential there when approached from a different perspective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of it instead as just a portable node in a grid -- it can connect to any other node (including display nodes such as those glasses you're wearing) and draw on their processing power; or it can wokr on its own to deliver reminders and information to you.
The form factor as we consider it today is pretty limiting, but it doesn't mean that there's no potential there when approached from a different perspective.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847968</id>
	<title>Certainly</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1264098240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The concept is an exciting one. Sci fi has been toying with the idea of "wrist pads" and other wearable sophisticated electronics for decades now. However a fundamental problem remains: the power source. Although some effort is being made in that area too. I just don't want to think about where they're planning on storing the batteries...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The concept is an exciting one .
Sci fi has been toying with the idea of " wrist pads " and other wearable sophisticated electronics for decades now .
However a fundamental problem remains : the power source .
Although some effort is being made in that area too .
I just do n't want to think about where they 're planning on storing the batteries.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The concept is an exciting one.
Sci fi has been toying with the idea of "wrist pads" and other wearable sophisticated electronics for decades now.
However a fundamental problem remains: the power source.
Although some effort is being made in that area too.
I just don't want to think about where they're planning on storing the batteries...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848954</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>xeoron</author>
	<datestamp>1264102680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If only there were ocular implants to project a virtual HUD, then wearable computer's would be much more useful....</htmltext>
<tokenext>If only there were ocular implants to project a virtual HUD , then wearable computer 's would be much more useful... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If only there were ocular implants to project a virtual HUD, then wearable computer's would be much more useful....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848744</id>
	<title>Article title should read...</title>
	<author>Tobor the Eighth Man</author>
	<datestamp>1264101600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Asus Says Stuff You Already Bought Is Dead, Hello Stuff We Want You To Buy Soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Asus Says Stuff You Already Bought Is Dead , Hello Stuff We Want You To Buy Soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Asus Says Stuff You Already Bought Is Dead, Hello Stuff We Want You To Buy Soon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30861766</id>
	<title>Re:History of computing paradigms</title>
	<author>suso</author>
	<datestamp>1264187820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, but they still had those little pda devices, which was my point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , but they still had those little pda devices , which was my point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, but they still had those little pda devices, which was my point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847906</id>
	<title>No they aren't</title>
	<author>Transient0</author>
	<datestamp>1264097940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No size of portable computer from wristwatch to 17" notebook will ever be obsolete. Different tasks require different sized screens, and people who do those tasks will always want the most portable device they can do them on. Yes, for some tasks that will mean a wristwatch. But for many others that means a smartphone, or a netbook, or a desktop computer with three 21" monitors.</p><p>Haven't we had this discussion before?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No size of portable computer from wristwatch to 17 " notebook will ever be obsolete .
Different tasks require different sized screens , and people who do those tasks will always want the most portable device they can do them on .
Yes , for some tasks that will mean a wristwatch .
But for many others that means a smartphone , or a netbook , or a desktop computer with three 21 " monitors.Have n't we had this discussion before ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No size of portable computer from wristwatch to 17" notebook will ever be obsolete.
Different tasks require different sized screens, and people who do those tasks will always want the most portable device they can do them on.
Yes, for some tasks that will mean a wristwatch.
But for many others that means a smartphone, or a netbook, or a desktop computer with three 21" monitors.Haven't we had this discussion before?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848340</id>
	<title>Re:Wristwatch computers? Already have that.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264099800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree with Asus... Netbook will die by the hands of wearable computers... but not with a wristwatche monitor...  they'll need at least Retinal Display to be interesting... perhaps a partnership between Asus and Microvision...???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with Asus... Netbook will die by the hands of wearable computers... but not with a wristwatche monitor... they 'll need at least Retinal Display to be interesting... perhaps a partnership between Asus and Microvision... ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with Asus... Netbook will die by the hands of wearable computers... but not with a wristwatche monitor...  they'll need at least Retinal Display to be interesting... perhaps a partnership between Asus and Microvision...??
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30856710</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>DMUTPeregrine</author>
	<datestamp>1264099800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And yet thousands of people strap their iPods to their biceps at gyms around the country. "wristwatch" might not work well, but "armband" sure does. I can easily see a more powerful iPhone-like device coming with an arm/wristband.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And yet thousands of people strap their iPods to their biceps at gyms around the country .
" wristwatch " might not work well , but " armband " sure does .
I can easily see a more powerful iPhone-like device coming with an arm/wristband .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And yet thousands of people strap their iPods to their biceps at gyms around the country.
"wristwatch" might not work well, but "armband" sure does.
I can easily see a more powerful iPhone-like device coming with an arm/wristband.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848448</id>
	<title>The way I see it...</title>
	<author>Rene S. Hollan</author>
	<datestamp>1264100220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's no need for a general purpose applications device on one's wrist, except for very specialized applications: phone, text messaging, compass, navigation, perhaps. Maybe calculator. The same sort of "apps" we had on relatively small screened cell phones of a few years ago, like my Moto E815 (damn that thing had a great radio).</p><p>The trouble with this is that it's extremely battery limited. Still, if you want uberportable basics that run for one day, it's O.K.</p><p>A step up is the modern IPhone or Android-powered phone. Belt clip size, with decent battery life (because it can hold a bigger battery). Now, combining the two allows for interesting possibilities: the wristputer now becomes an auxilliary display device: glance at your wrist to see your appointments, or incoming calls, etc. Just swap the SIM card from the wristputer to the cell phone to use the latter's mobile data connection.</p><p>One step up is the single screen ebook. I see this as a handheld, which can function as a phone, or use the bluetooth or wifi connection to the belt-clipped phone, for dialing and call management (in parallel with the cell phone and wrist computer: if I'm reading a book and a call comes in, or I want to make a call, I'd like to do that from the UI on the book I'm reading instread of having to reach for another device (earbud, wristputer, or belt-clipped phone). Of course, it too can take a SIM card, if that's all you want to carry.</p><p>Finally, for more serious reading, in the format of a traditional book, at the expense of size, is the dual-screen ebook, that folds. This one has color screens (instead of just, perhaps, e-ink). It has all the capabilities of the single-screen e-book.</p><p>Each device is optimized for a particular purpose, but can be pressed into service for alternate uses: which devices a user caries depends on their physical activity and the types of computing they expect to be doing. I can very much see the single-screen e-book as a universal remote control, for example.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no need for a general purpose applications device on one 's wrist , except for very specialized applications : phone , text messaging , compass , navigation , perhaps .
Maybe calculator .
The same sort of " apps " we had on relatively small screened cell phones of a few years ago , like my Moto E815 ( damn that thing had a great radio ) .The trouble with this is that it 's extremely battery limited .
Still , if you want uberportable basics that run for one day , it 's O.K.A step up is the modern IPhone or Android-powered phone .
Belt clip size , with decent battery life ( because it can hold a bigger battery ) .
Now , combining the two allows for interesting possibilities : the wristputer now becomes an auxilliary display device : glance at your wrist to see your appointments , or incoming calls , etc .
Just swap the SIM card from the wristputer to the cell phone to use the latter 's mobile data connection.One step up is the single screen ebook .
I see this as a handheld , which can function as a phone , or use the bluetooth or wifi connection to the belt-clipped phone , for dialing and call management ( in parallel with the cell phone and wrist computer : if I 'm reading a book and a call comes in , or I want to make a call , I 'd like to do that from the UI on the book I 'm reading instread of having to reach for another device ( earbud , wristputer , or belt-clipped phone ) .
Of course , it too can take a SIM card , if that 's all you want to carry.Finally , for more serious reading , in the format of a traditional book , at the expense of size , is the dual-screen ebook , that folds .
This one has color screens ( instead of just , perhaps , e-ink ) .
It has all the capabilities of the single-screen e-book.Each device is optimized for a particular purpose , but can be pressed into service for alternate uses : which devices a user caries depends on their physical activity and the types of computing they expect to be doing .
I can very much see the single-screen e-book as a universal remote control , for example .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no need for a general purpose applications device on one's wrist, except for very specialized applications: phone, text messaging, compass, navigation, perhaps.
Maybe calculator.
The same sort of "apps" we had on relatively small screened cell phones of a few years ago, like my Moto E815 (damn that thing had a great radio).The trouble with this is that it's extremely battery limited.
Still, if you want uberportable basics that run for one day, it's O.K.A step up is the modern IPhone or Android-powered phone.
Belt clip size, with decent battery life (because it can hold a bigger battery).
Now, combining the two allows for interesting possibilities: the wristputer now becomes an auxilliary display device: glance at your wrist to see your appointments, or incoming calls, etc.
Just swap the SIM card from the wristputer to the cell phone to use the latter's mobile data connection.One step up is the single screen ebook.
I see this as a handheld, which can function as a phone, or use the bluetooth or wifi connection to the belt-clipped phone, for dialing and call management (in parallel with the cell phone and wrist computer: if I'm reading a book and a call comes in, or I want to make a call, I'd like to do that from the UI on the book I'm reading instread of having to reach for another device (earbud, wristputer, or belt-clipped phone).
Of course, it too can take a SIM card, if that's all you want to carry.Finally, for more serious reading, in the format of a traditional book, at the expense of size, is the dual-screen ebook, that folds.
This one has color screens (instead of just, perhaps, e-ink).
It has all the capabilities of the single-screen e-book.Each device is optimized for a particular purpose, but can be pressed into service for alternate uses: which devices a user caries depends on their physical activity and the types of computing they expect to be doing.
I can very much see the single-screen e-book as a universal remote control, for example.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849938</id>
	<title>For everyone here who has seen the movie Predator</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264106700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>THAT would be a great computer form-factor! And make the screen a touchscreen, and include adjustable padding between the shell and the wearer's forearm so that the computer would fit snugly on most people. Just don't add in the portable nuke.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>THAT would be a great computer form-factor !
And make the screen a touchscreen , and include adjustable padding between the shell and the wearer 's forearm so that the computer would fit snugly on most people .
Just do n't add in the portable nuke .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>THAT would be a great computer form-factor!
And make the screen a touchscreen, and include adjustable padding between the shell and the wearer's forearm so that the computer would fit snugly on most people.
Just don't add in the portable nuke.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30858442</id>
	<title>Re:Not on my wrist</title>
	<author>robi5</author>
	<datestamp>1264168680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Same here with not using a wristwatch. But if it had some new uses, I'd reconsider. For example, it could monitor your pulse and call ambulance if a sudden cardiac death occurs to you, or it could selectively and unobtrusively project information to you at a meeting, or act as a touchless payment form. Useful computing has continuously come closer to our body, and a wrist computer or a retina-display and a bluetooth headset is closer to us than a phone with a 3" screen in the pocket.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Same here with not using a wristwatch .
But if it had some new uses , I 'd reconsider .
For example , it could monitor your pulse and call ambulance if a sudden cardiac death occurs to you , or it could selectively and unobtrusively project information to you at a meeting , or act as a touchless payment form .
Useful computing has continuously come closer to our body , and a wrist computer or a retina-display and a bluetooth headset is closer to us than a phone with a 3 " screen in the pocket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same here with not using a wristwatch.
But if it had some new uses, I'd reconsider.
For example, it could monitor your pulse and call ambulance if a sudden cardiac death occurs to you, or it could selectively and unobtrusively project information to you at a meeting, or act as a touchless payment form.
Useful computing has continuously come closer to our body, and a wrist computer or a retina-display and a bluetooth headset is closer to us than a phone with a 3" screen in the pocket.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848788</id>
	<title>Wearable==head mounted display, data glove input</title>
	<author>PeterM from Berkeley</author>
	<datestamp>1264101840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sorry, but until I can look at a minimum of 1600x1200 resolution display, and give input by hand gestures (data gloves), (and maybe voice), it isn't wearable computing.</p><p>I want to be sitting absolutely anywhere and wiggling my fingers in the data gloves and making gestures, looking at &gt;=1600x1200, with reasonable speed &amp; memory capacity.  Or hell, even walking around so I don't get so damn fat.</p><p>--PM</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry , but until I can look at a minimum of 1600x1200 resolution display , and give input by hand gestures ( data gloves ) , ( and maybe voice ) , it is n't wearable computing.I want to be sitting absolutely anywhere and wiggling my fingers in the data gloves and making gestures , looking at &gt; = 1600x1200 , with reasonable speed &amp; memory capacity .
Or hell , even walking around so I do n't get so damn fat.--PM</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry, but until I can look at a minimum of 1600x1200 resolution display, and give input by hand gestures (data gloves), (and maybe voice), it isn't wearable computing.I want to be sitting absolutely anywhere and wiggling my fingers in the data gloves and making gestures, looking at &gt;=1600x1200, with reasonable speed &amp; memory capacity.
Or hell, even walking around so I don't get so damn fat.--PM</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848580</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>Xemu</author>
	<datestamp>1264100760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>How about dictation,</i></p><p>Double the killer select all</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about dictation,Double the killer select all</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about dictation,Double the killer select all</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849708</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>bondsbw</author>
	<datestamp>1264105800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wrist watches are only good for video chat with your dog.  That's why Penny also carried a netbook... er, computer book.</p><p>Now, if I only had a helicopter in my fedora, I'd be set.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wrist watches are only good for video chat with your dog .
That 's why Penny also carried a netbook... er , computer book.Now , if I only had a helicopter in my fedora , I 'd be set .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wrist watches are only good for video chat with your dog.
That's why Penny also carried a netbook... er, computer book.Now, if I only had a helicopter in my fedora, I'd be set.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848350</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264099800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, I resent that, my calculator watch works great.  Want to set the alarm?  Just type in the time.  Battery life not bad either--seven years.  I wish Casio would add a Taylor-split function to the stopwatch, other than that it's just right (as a watch).  Never had any interest in the Casio data bank watches.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , I resent that , my calculator watch works great .
Want to set the alarm ?
Just type in the time .
Battery life not bad either--seven years .
I wish Casio would add a Taylor-split function to the stopwatch , other than that it 's just right ( as a watch ) .
Never had any interest in the Casio data bank watches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, I resent that, my calculator watch works great.
Want to set the alarm?
Just type in the time.
Battery life not bad either--seven years.
I wish Casio would add a Taylor-split function to the stopwatch, other than that it's just right (as a watch).
Never had any interest in the Casio data bank watches.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847996</id>
	<title>but</title>
	<author>KingPin27</author>
	<datestamp>1264098360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This would make viewing and participating with certain types of "vivid" media a little more challenging to say the least.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This would make viewing and participating with certain types of " vivid " media a little more challenging to say the least .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would make viewing and participating with certain types of "vivid" media a little more challenging to say the least.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30851464</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>Creepy</author>
	<datestamp>1264068780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I personally don't see a long term future with wrist watch computers, though the wrist may be an ok place to put the brains of the computer.  Personally, I think eyeware/earware is the right direction, especially as minification of video circuitry gets better.  It'd be nice to have some kind of hand apparatus to serve as a virtual keyboard, as well.  The current state of most computer glasses is the resolution is terrible (often only 320x240 or 640x480), but you get a virtual 70-80" display - that would need to improve significantly.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Ultimately, I'd expect the glasses to be multipurpose - serve as corrective lenses (for nearsightedness, at least) - if the lenses needed to be opaque to put LCD/LED, cameras could display what you should see on the screen, sunglasses, light amplification glasses (e.g. for night driving), and a video display - even a heads up display - it could communicate with the car for info like speed and road conditions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I personally do n't see a long term future with wrist watch computers , though the wrist may be an ok place to put the brains of the computer .
Personally , I think eyeware/earware is the right direction , especially as minification of video circuitry gets better .
It 'd be nice to have some kind of hand apparatus to serve as a virtual keyboard , as well .
The current state of most computer glasses is the resolution is terrible ( often only 320x240 or 640x480 ) , but you get a virtual 70-80 " display - that would need to improve significantly .
    Ultimately , I 'd expect the glasses to be multipurpose - serve as corrective lenses ( for nearsightedness , at least ) - if the lenses needed to be opaque to put LCD/LED , cameras could display what you should see on the screen , sunglasses , light amplification glasses ( e.g .
for night driving ) , and a video display - even a heads up display - it could communicate with the car for info like speed and road conditions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I personally don't see a long term future with wrist watch computers, though the wrist may be an ok place to put the brains of the computer.
Personally, I think eyeware/earware is the right direction, especially as minification of video circuitry gets better.
It'd be nice to have some kind of hand apparatus to serve as a virtual keyboard, as well.
The current state of most computer glasses is the resolution is terrible (often only 320x240 or 640x480), but you get a virtual 70-80" display - that would need to improve significantly.
    Ultimately, I'd expect the glasses to be multipurpose - serve as corrective lenses (for nearsightedness, at least) - if the lenses needed to be opaque to put LCD/LED, cameras could display what you should see on the screen, sunglasses, light amplification glasses (e.g.
for night driving), and a video display - even a heads up display - it could communicate with the car for info like speed and road conditions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847982</id>
	<title>Two Words</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1264098300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>PIP Boy</p><p>The reality of wearable computer is context sensitive information. Not comprehensive feature sets.</p><p>You put the following into a wearable PiP Boy computer and they'll sell like mad:</p><p>SMS\Instant Messaging<br>Current Fuel Prices at bookmarked gas stations<br>RSS Feed (We have ad those on pagers for 3 decades)<br>TO DO Lists<br>Calendar\PIM<br>Digital Rolodex<br>Vitals (heart rate, blood sugar, pill timers)<br>Integrated cell phone to a head set or in-canal ear piece<br>Memory slot for MP3 player<br>Grocery Lists<br>Bank RSS feeds (think Mint.com for mobiles)<br>as well as remote car entry, light timers, etc so as you approach the car or home<br>2 USB ports with some storage space<br>GPS and Navigation.</p><p>Look at the wrist watch vs pocket watch.<br>Look at the cell phone vs the wrist watch.</p><p>I actually foresee a primary cpu until (pehaps shoulder mounted backed against the shoulder blade, see Macross Plus for a report with s similar looking deal) with context sensetive nodes (the main cpu links to various accessories like a watch, shoes, camera, etc.)</p><p>Yeah If I could get get a VATS until to go with that..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>PIP BoyThe reality of wearable computer is context sensitive information .
Not comprehensive feature sets.You put the following into a wearable PiP Boy computer and they 'll sell like mad : SMS \ Instant MessagingCurrent Fuel Prices at bookmarked gas stationsRSS Feed ( We have ad those on pagers for 3 decades ) TO DO ListsCalendar \ PIMDigital RolodexVitals ( heart rate , blood sugar , pill timers ) Integrated cell phone to a head set or in-canal ear pieceMemory slot for MP3 playerGrocery ListsBank RSS feeds ( think Mint.com for mobiles ) as well as remote car entry , light timers , etc so as you approach the car or home2 USB ports with some storage spaceGPS and Navigation.Look at the wrist watch vs pocket watch.Look at the cell phone vs the wrist watch.I actually foresee a primary cpu until ( pehaps shoulder mounted backed against the shoulder blade , see Macross Plus for a report with s similar looking deal ) with context sensetive nodes ( the main cpu links to various accessories like a watch , shoes , camera , etc .
) Yeah If I could get get a VATS until to go with that. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PIP BoyThe reality of wearable computer is context sensitive information.
Not comprehensive feature sets.You put the following into a wearable PiP Boy computer and they'll sell like mad:SMS\Instant MessagingCurrent Fuel Prices at bookmarked gas stationsRSS Feed (We have ad those on pagers for 3 decades)TO DO ListsCalendar\PIMDigital RolodexVitals (heart rate, blood sugar, pill timers)Integrated cell phone to a head set or in-canal ear pieceMemory slot for MP3 playerGrocery ListsBank RSS feeds (think Mint.com for mobiles)as well as remote car entry, light timers, etc so as you approach the car or home2 USB ports with some storage spaceGPS and Navigation.Look at the wrist watch vs pocket watch.Look at the cell phone vs the wrist watch.I actually foresee a primary cpu until (pehaps shoulder mounted backed against the shoulder blade, see Macross Plus for a report with s similar looking deal) with context sensetive nodes (the main cpu links to various accessories like a watch, shoes, camera, etc.
)Yeah If I could get get a VATS until to go with that..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847786</id>
	<title>eeh...</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1264097460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...Wristwatch Computers.</p></div><p>hahahaha <i>HA HA HA</i> oh god, <i>oh god</i>... it kills me.</p><p>You know, I can just believe that we can cram everything but the input and display into that small of a space -- but the human interface problem makes any further degree of minaturization rather pointless for general-purpose computers. In select circumstances, you can get away with a lack of keyboard or a mini one, but really -- anything you plan on using heavily you want to have a decently-sized display and an input device with more than two buttons.</p><p>But even if you could solve the i/o problems, there's another more damning one: energy requirements. You need a power source for it. And there just doesn't seem to be any real technology innovations that are going to give you the energy densities you'd need to make it work for awhile.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Wristwatch Computers.hahahaha HA HA HA oh god , oh god... it kills me.You know , I can just believe that we can cram everything but the input and display into that small of a space -- but the human interface problem makes any further degree of minaturization rather pointless for general-purpose computers .
In select circumstances , you can get away with a lack of keyboard or a mini one , but really -- anything you plan on using heavily you want to have a decently-sized display and an input device with more than two buttons.But even if you could solve the i/o problems , there 's another more damning one : energy requirements .
You need a power source for it .
And there just does n't seem to be any real technology innovations that are going to give you the energy densities you 'd need to make it work for awhile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...Wristwatch Computers.hahahaha HA HA HA oh god, oh god... it kills me.You know, I can just believe that we can cram everything but the input and display into that small of a space -- but the human interface problem makes any further degree of minaturization rather pointless for general-purpose computers.
In select circumstances, you can get away with a lack of keyboard or a mini one, but really -- anything you plan on using heavily you want to have a decently-sized display and an input device with more than two buttons.But even if you could solve the i/o problems, there's another more damning one: energy requirements.
You need a power source for it.
And there just doesn't seem to be any real technology innovations that are going to give you the energy densities you'd need to make it work for awhile.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850098</id>
	<title>marketing material from the guy who apologized</title>
	<author>Locutus</author>
	<datestamp>1264107480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>he is the one who apologized for showing an ARM Linux based device at a big computer show last year and he did so with some likely help and probably poking from Microsoft:<br><br>http://blogs.computerworld.com/microsoft\_strikes\_back\_at\_linux\_netbook\_push<br><br>And what is with that $399 price the article talks about regarding the original netbooks? The price was $249 and it is Microsoft who has been pushing for higher prices and requiring it because of the excess hardware required just to run Windows.<br><br>In other words, it is just a PR pitch from another puppet of Microsoft's. And they pretty much want the netbook dead or declared dead because ARM based devices are about to eat their lunch. Microsoft still has nothing to combat Linux on ARM and Intel is hoping they can hold off the market til they start making x86 based CPUs on single digit processes so the power usage competes with last years ARM chips.<br><br>A whole bunch of big players want netbooks dead and declaring it is helps them because the uninformed will believe it. IMO.<br><br>LoB</htmltext>
<tokenext>he is the one who apologized for showing an ARM Linux based device at a big computer show last year and he did so with some likely help and probably poking from Microsoft : http : //blogs.computerworld.com/microsoft \ _strikes \ _back \ _at \ _linux \ _netbook \ _pushAnd what is with that $ 399 price the article talks about regarding the original netbooks ?
The price was $ 249 and it is Microsoft who has been pushing for higher prices and requiring it because of the excess hardware required just to run Windows.In other words , it is just a PR pitch from another puppet of Microsoft 's .
And they pretty much want the netbook dead or declared dead because ARM based devices are about to eat their lunch .
Microsoft still has nothing to combat Linux on ARM and Intel is hoping they can hold off the market til they start making x86 based CPUs on single digit processes so the power usage competes with last years ARM chips.A whole bunch of big players want netbooks dead and declaring it is helps them because the uninformed will believe it .
IMO.LoB</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he is the one who apologized for showing an ARM Linux based device at a big computer show last year and he did so with some likely help and probably poking from Microsoft:http://blogs.computerworld.com/microsoft\_strikes\_back\_at\_linux\_netbook\_pushAnd what is with that $399 price the article talks about regarding the original netbooks?
The price was $249 and it is Microsoft who has been pushing for higher prices and requiring it because of the excess hardware required just to run Windows.In other words, it is just a PR pitch from another puppet of Microsoft's.
And they pretty much want the netbook dead or declared dead because ARM based devices are about to eat their lunch.
Microsoft still has nothing to combat Linux on ARM and Intel is hoping they can hold off the market til they start making x86 based CPUs on single digit processes so the power usage competes with last years ARM chips.A whole bunch of big players want netbooks dead and declaring it is helps them because the uninformed will believe it.
IMO.LoB</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849184</id>
	<title>Re:Ergonomics?</title>
	<author>jpmorgan</author>
	<datestamp>1264103700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing to remember about<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. is it has a certain minority population who are practically luddites. At least, remarkably unimaginative. Any new computer form factor is inevitably met with scorn and derision, because it's not exactly the same as the computers they're using today, and god forbid you have to learn a new way of interacting with technology once every twenty years.</p><p>Usually whenever this sentiment is expressed, it is met with a reply along the lines of 'but the way things are now is BETTER,' followed by a host of flawed reasons why the given technology is stupid. Because, as we all know, a wearable computer is useless without the ability to read PDFs on it.</p><p>Now I'm not saying every new innovation is ultimately good and worthwhile. But there are sadly a lot of so-called geeks who are willing to dismiss new ideas without even giving them a fair chance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing to remember about / .
is it has a certain minority population who are practically luddites .
At least , remarkably unimaginative .
Any new computer form factor is inevitably met with scorn and derision , because it 's not exactly the same as the computers they 're using today , and god forbid you have to learn a new way of interacting with technology once every twenty years.Usually whenever this sentiment is expressed , it is met with a reply along the lines of 'but the way things are now is BETTER, ' followed by a host of flawed reasons why the given technology is stupid .
Because , as we all know , a wearable computer is useless without the ability to read PDFs on it.Now I 'm not saying every new innovation is ultimately good and worthwhile .
But there are sadly a lot of so-called geeks who are willing to dismiss new ideas without even giving them a fair chance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing to remember about /.
is it has a certain minority population who are practically luddites.
At least, remarkably unimaginative.
Any new computer form factor is inevitably met with scorn and derision, because it's not exactly the same as the computers they're using today, and god forbid you have to learn a new way of interacting with technology once every twenty years.Usually whenever this sentiment is expressed, it is met with a reply along the lines of 'but the way things are now is BETTER,' followed by a host of flawed reasons why the given technology is stupid.
Because, as we all know, a wearable computer is useless without the ability to read PDFs on it.Now I'm not saying every new innovation is ultimately good and worthwhile.
But there are sadly a lot of so-called geeks who are willing to dismiss new ideas without even giving them a fair chance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847682</id>
	<title>Wait there pardner</title>
	<author>starfishsystems</author>
	<datestamp>1264097040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But don't hold your breath.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But do n't hold your breath .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But don't hold your breath.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30852850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30854156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30855088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30851062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30851856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30851022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30851464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30853482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30856710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30858442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30854742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30856604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30856528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30856404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30861766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1511236_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847784
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30854156
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30855088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848172
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848966
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848788
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30856528
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847906
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847968
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30853482
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848430
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30856604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848060
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848032
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848374
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847840
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847846
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848220
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848962
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849238
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848130
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30851856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848572
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30851022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848004
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847754
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848102
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30851062
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30856404
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849262
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848074
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848580
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849202
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849708
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847950
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848350
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848346
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848948
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30852850
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850208
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850518
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30861766
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30856710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847934
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848162
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847914
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848712
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849128
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30851464
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848396
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848676
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849498
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848634
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848132
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30847802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848340
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30850328
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30854742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30858442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1511236.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30848460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1511236.30849132
</commentlist>
</conversation>
