<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_21_0330201</id>
	<title>Scientists To Breed the Auroch From Extinction</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1264090680000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>ImNotARealPerson writes <i>"Scientists in Italy are hoping to <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/wildlife/7011035/Giant-cattle-to-be-bred-back-from-extinction.html">breed back from extinction</a> the mighty <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurochs">auroch</a>, a bovine species which has been extinct since 1627. The auroch weighed 2,200 pounds (1000kg) and its shoulders stood at 6'6". The beasts once roamed most of Asia and northern Africa. The animal was depicted in cave paintings and Julius Caesar described it as being a little less in size than an elephant. A member of the Consortium for Experimental Biotechnology suggests that 99\% of the auroch's DNA can be recreated from genetic material found in surviving bone material. Wikipedia mentions that researchers in Poland are working on the same problem."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>ImNotARealPerson writes " Scientists in Italy are hoping to breed back from extinction the mighty auroch , a bovine species which has been extinct since 1627 .
The auroch weighed 2,200 pounds ( 1000kg ) and its shoulders stood at 6'6 " .
The beasts once roamed most of Asia and northern Africa .
The animal was depicted in cave paintings and Julius Caesar described it as being a little less in size than an elephant .
A member of the Consortium for Experimental Biotechnology suggests that 99 \ % of the auroch 's DNA can be recreated from genetic material found in surviving bone material .
Wikipedia mentions that researchers in Poland are working on the same problem .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ImNotARealPerson writes "Scientists in Italy are hoping to breed back from extinction the mighty auroch, a bovine species which has been extinct since 1627.
The auroch weighed 2,200 pounds (1000kg) and its shoulders stood at 6'6".
The beasts once roamed most of Asia and northern Africa.
The animal was depicted in cave paintings and Julius Caesar described it as being a little less in size than an elephant.
A member of the Consortium for Experimental Biotechnology suggests that 99\% of the auroch's DNA can be recreated from genetic material found in surviving bone material.
Wikipedia mentions that researchers in Poland are working on the same problem.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846100</id>
	<title>YOU *SHOULD* BE AFRAID</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264090380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try to imagine yourself in the Cretaceous Period. You get your first look at this 'six foot turkey' as you enter a clearing. He moves like a bird, lightly, bobbing his head. And you keep still because you think that maybe his visual acuity is based on movement like T-Rex - he'll lose you if you don't move. No, not Velociraptor. You stare at him, and he just stares right back. And that's when the attack comes. Not from the front, but from the side, *fwooomph* from the other two 'raptors you didn't even know were there. Because Velociraptor's a pack hunter, you see, he uses coordinated attack patterns and he is out in force today. And he slashes at you with this...*brandishes pointy fossil* a six-inch retractable claw, like a razor, on the the middle toe. He doesn't bother to bite your jugular like a lion, say... no no. He slashes at you here...*slashes the chest* or here...*slashes the balls* or maybe across the belly, spilling your intestines. The point is... you are alive when they start to eat you. So you know... try to show a little respect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try to imagine yourself in the Cretaceous Period .
You get your first look at this 'six foot turkey ' as you enter a clearing .
He moves like a bird , lightly , bobbing his head .
And you keep still because you think that maybe his visual acuity is based on movement like T-Rex - he 'll lose you if you do n't move .
No , not Velociraptor .
You stare at him , and he just stares right back .
And that 's when the attack comes .
Not from the front , but from the side , * fwooomph * from the other two 'raptors you did n't even know were there .
Because Velociraptor 's a pack hunter , you see , he uses coordinated attack patterns and he is out in force today .
And he slashes at you with this... * brandishes pointy fossil * a six-inch retractable claw , like a razor , on the the middle toe .
He does n't bother to bite your jugular like a lion , say... no no .
He slashes at you here... * slashes the chest * or here... * slashes the balls * or maybe across the belly , spilling your intestines .
The point is... you are alive when they start to eat you .
So you know... try to show a little respect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try to imagine yourself in the Cretaceous Period.
You get your first look at this 'six foot turkey' as you enter a clearing.
He moves like a bird, lightly, bobbing his head.
And you keep still because you think that maybe his visual acuity is based on movement like T-Rex - he'll lose you if you don't move.
No, not Velociraptor.
You stare at him, and he just stares right back.
And that's when the attack comes.
Not from the front, but from the side, *fwooomph* from the other two 'raptors you didn't even know were there.
Because Velociraptor's a pack hunter, you see, he uses coordinated attack patterns and he is out in force today.
And he slashes at you with this...*brandishes pointy fossil* a six-inch retractable claw, like a razor, on the the middle toe.
He doesn't bother to bite your jugular like a lion, say... no no.
He slashes at you here...*slashes the chest* or here...*slashes the balls* or maybe across the belly, spilling your intestines.
The point is... you are alive when they start to eat you.
So you know... try to show a little respect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154</id>
	<title>What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264008240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jurassic Park edition!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jurassic Park edition !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jurassic Park edition!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30848870</id>
	<title>Re:99\%?</title>
	<author>brit74</author>
	<datestamp>1264102320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I know it's no longer accurate, but for the longest geneticists thought humans and chimps were 99\% similar genetically.... but there does seem to be a gulf... </i>
<br> <br>
If scientists have 99\% of the DNA, then presumably they would fill-in the missing 1\% of DNA from a similar animal.  (If there were any doubts about which cow is most similar, they could do a DNA comparison.)  If the closest animal is 99\% similar, then they'd be able to reconstruct the original DNA with 99.99\% accuracy.  The only incorrect segments of DNA would be within the missing 1\% of the original Auroch DNA *and* where the closest relative differed from the Auroch version.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know it 's no longer accurate , but for the longest geneticists thought humans and chimps were 99 \ % similar genetically.... but there does seem to be a gulf.. . If scientists have 99 \ % of the DNA , then presumably they would fill-in the missing 1 \ % of DNA from a similar animal .
( If there were any doubts about which cow is most similar , they could do a DNA comparison .
) If the closest animal is 99 \ % similar , then they 'd be able to reconstruct the original DNA with 99.99 \ % accuracy .
The only incorrect segments of DNA would be within the missing 1 \ % of the original Auroch DNA * and * where the closest relative differed from the Auroch version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know it's no longer accurate, but for the longest geneticists thought humans and chimps were 99\% similar genetically.... but there does seem to be a gulf... 
 
If scientists have 99\% of the DNA, then presumably they would fill-in the missing 1\% of DNA from a similar animal.
(If there were any doubts about which cow is most similar, they could do a DNA comparison.
)  If the closest animal is 99\% similar, then they'd be able to reconstruct the original DNA with 99.99\% accuracy.
The only incorrect segments of DNA would be within the missing 1\% of the original Auroch DNA *and* where the closest relative differed from the Auroch version.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844968</id>
	<title>Re:Already Been Done, Seventy Years Ago</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264084320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the nazis provided the funding.</p><p>I kind of assume the Hecks were also are motivated by scientific curiosity.<br>science is also 'motivated' by money, doesn't matter if it's from nazi's.</p><p>and I do not think the Germans in those days had the view upon nazi's we have...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the nazis provided the funding.I kind of assume the Hecks were also are motivated by scientific curiosity.science is also 'motivated ' by money , does n't matter if it 's from nazi 's.and I do not think the Germans in those days had the view upon nazi 's we have.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the nazis provided the funding.I kind of assume the Hecks were also are motivated by scientific curiosity.science is also 'motivated' by money, doesn't matter if it's from nazi's.and I do not think the Germans in those days had the view upon nazi's we have...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844760</id>
	<title>Re:99\%?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264082580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Big deal. apt-get has had Super Cow powers for years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Big deal .
apt-get has had Super Cow powers for years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Big deal.
apt-get has had Super Cow powers for years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842220</id>
	<title>Well, a lot of people drive Volkswagens</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264008960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't this the critter the Nazis were trying to recreate as a symbol of virile bovine macho?</p><p>Since it is recently extinct with a surviving linage, I suppose it \_is\_ a scientifically likely candidate for this sort of thing even if it has the taint of political incorrectness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this the critter the Nazis were trying to recreate as a symbol of virile bovine macho ? Since it is recently extinct with a surviving linage , I suppose it \ _is \ _ a scientifically likely candidate for this sort of thing even if it has the taint of political incorrectness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this the critter the Nazis were trying to recreate as a symbol of virile bovine macho?Since it is recently extinct with a surviving linage, I suppose it \_is\_ a scientifically likely candidate for this sort of thing even if it has the taint of political incorrectness.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30848894</id>
	<title>Re:Just because you can ...</title>
	<author>c6gunner</author>
	<datestamp>1264102380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Have these scientists contemplated what could happen if these created creatures escape into the wild breeding amongst themselves and/or other similar species.</p></div><p>Yah, because a herd of slow-moving herbivores which we've ALREADY hunted to extinction is somehow going to be impossible to exterminate.  Those 2,000lb bovines are sneaky fuckers.  I think there's a colony hiding under my fridge.  I keep putting out traps but, no matter how many I kill, there always seem to be more!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have these scientists contemplated what could happen if these created creatures escape into the wild breeding amongst themselves and/or other similar species.Yah , because a herd of slow-moving herbivores which we 've ALREADY hunted to extinction is somehow going to be impossible to exterminate .
Those 2,000lb bovines are sneaky fuckers .
I think there 's a colony hiding under my fridge .
I keep putting out traps but , no matter how many I kill , there always seem to be more !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have these scientists contemplated what could happen if these created creatures escape into the wild breeding amongst themselves and/or other similar species.Yah, because a herd of slow-moving herbivores which we've ALREADY hunted to extinction is somehow going to be impossible to exterminate.
Those 2,000lb bovines are sneaky fuckers.
I think there's a colony hiding under my fridge.
I keep putting out traps but, no matter how many I kill, there always seem to be more!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844646</id>
	<title>Re:Is 99\% enough?</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1264081440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now we all know that there's "some species of African frog which can change its sex from female to male in a single sex environment."<br> <br>This might make for some interesting batches of milk.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now we all know that there 's " some species of African frog which can change its sex from female to male in a single sex environment .
" This might make for some interesting batches of milk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now we all know that there's "some species of African frog which can change its sex from female to male in a single sex environment.
" This might make for some interesting batches of milk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845850</id>
	<title>Sure, there's the ohhs and ahhs</title>
	<author>tekrat</author>
	<datestamp>1264089360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And later, there's the running... and the screaming...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And later , there 's the running... and the screaming.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And later, there's the running... and the screaming...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843416</id>
	<title>Re:Already Been Done, Seventy Years Ago</title>
	<author>piotru</author>
	<datestamp>1264065000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That very  Lutz Heck who in 1939 arrived at freshly captured Warsaw to plunder the zoological garden.<br>The programme of his visit included more looting in Bialowieza forest. He had stolen the specimens of Przewalski horse, Tarpan and Zubr - the last species being a point of sour professional jealousy...<br>After the robbery, Gestapo officers organized hunting binges in what remained of the ZOO in Warsaw, but that's off topic here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That very Lutz Heck who in 1939 arrived at freshly captured Warsaw to plunder the zoological garden.The programme of his visit included more looting in Bialowieza forest .
He had stolen the specimens of Przewalski horse , Tarpan and Zubr - the last species being a point of sour professional jealousy...After the robbery , Gestapo officers organized hunting binges in what remained of the ZOO in Warsaw , but that 's off topic here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That very  Lutz Heck who in 1939 arrived at freshly captured Warsaw to plunder the zoological garden.The programme of his visit included more looting in Bialowieza forest.
He had stolen the specimens of Przewalski horse, Tarpan and Zubr - the last species being a point of sour professional jealousy...After the robbery, Gestapo officers organized hunting binges in what remained of the ZOO in Warsaw, but that's off topic here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842850</id>
	<title>Mandatory</title>
	<author>TandooriC</author>
	<datestamp>1264014300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one welcome our new bio-engineered bovine overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our new bio-engineered bovine overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our new bio-engineered bovine overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845430</id>
	<title>So</title>
	<author>jimbobborg</author>
	<datestamp>1264087320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who's going to be the first to ride one of these in a rodeo?  I'm surprised no one even mentioned this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who 's going to be the first to ride one of these in a rodeo ?
I 'm surprised no one even mentioned this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who's going to be the first to ride one of these in a rodeo?
I'm surprised no one even mentioned this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845908</id>
	<title>Re:Is 99\% enough?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264089660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RTFA, they can reconstruct about 99\% of the Aurochs genome from bone samples now, so they know what to select on. So this project has a larger chance to recreate the Auroch than the Heck brothers had. (still no guarantee, but at least better odds)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RTFA , they can reconstruct about 99 \ % of the Aurochs genome from bone samples now , so they know what to select on .
So this project has a larger chance to recreate the Auroch than the Heck brothers had .
( still no guarantee , but at least better odds )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RTFA, they can reconstruct about 99\% of the Aurochs genome from bone samples now, so they know what to select on.
So this project has a larger chance to recreate the Auroch than the Heck brothers had.
(still no guarantee, but at least better odds)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30859748</id>
	<title>Re:Linguist Protest</title>
	<author>Ol Olsoc</author>
	<datestamp>1264177500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Like being stuck between auroch and a hard place.
<p>
\_
</p><p>
Warning, I brake for Chachalacas</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like being stuck between auroch and a hard place .
\ _ Warning , I brake for Chachalacas</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like being stuck between auroch and a hard place.
\_

Warning, I brake for Chachalacas</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843118</id>
	<title>I knew it!</title>
	<author>cyberzephyr</author>
	<datestamp>1264104120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I knew it a long time ago that i would live long enough to see Jurassic Park happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew it a long time ago that i would live long enough to see Jurassic Park happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew it a long time ago that i would live long enough to see Jurassic Park happen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30848188</id>
	<title>Re:99\%?</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1264099140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like both a large bovine, and one that has the double muscling gene. (Which also occurs in other species -- humans, dogs, and I believe also mice.)</p><p>A whippet with double muscling is a bizarre sight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like both a large bovine , and one that has the double muscling gene .
( Which also occurs in other species -- humans , dogs , and I believe also mice .
) A whippet with double muscling is a bizarre sight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like both a large bovine, and one that has the double muscling gene.
(Which also occurs in other species -- humans, dogs, and I believe also mice.
)A whippet with double muscling is a bizarre sight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842486</id>
	<title>Re:Just because you can ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264010940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... does not mean you should.</p><p>Have these scientists contemplated what could happen if these created creatures escape into the wild breeding amongst themselves and/or other similar species.</p><p>Whole ecosystems can be destroyed by introducing one creature into them.</p></div><p>You know, this argument is getting old for me. Anything that could progress human knowledge is looked down on anymore with an excuse like this one. I for one want to see real scientific advancement. I want genetic research on ALL levels. Lets bring back species that was destroyed by man, lets cure cancer, lets do SOMETHING.</p><p>A day will come when advancements in medicine/science will be had and everyone will then wonder why we waited so long.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... does not mean you should.Have these scientists contemplated what could happen if these created creatures escape into the wild breeding amongst themselves and/or other similar species.Whole ecosystems can be destroyed by introducing one creature into them.You know , this argument is getting old for me .
Anything that could progress human knowledge is looked down on anymore with an excuse like this one .
I for one want to see real scientific advancement .
I want genetic research on ALL levels .
Lets bring back species that was destroyed by man , lets cure cancer , lets do SOMETHING.A day will come when advancements in medicine/science will be had and everyone will then wonder why we waited so long .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... does not mean you should.Have these scientists contemplated what could happen if these created creatures escape into the wild breeding amongst themselves and/or other similar species.Whole ecosystems can be destroyed by introducing one creature into them.You know, this argument is getting old for me.
Anything that could progress human knowledge is looked down on anymore with an excuse like this one.
I for one want to see real scientific advancement.
I want genetic research on ALL levels.
Lets bring back species that was destroyed by man, lets cure cancer, lets do SOMETHING.A day will come when advancements in medicine/science will be had and everyone will then wonder why we waited so long.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30860176</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>sysadmn</author>
	<datestamp>1264179600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hmm.  What would the ancestor of all domestic cattle taste like.  Hmm.</p></div><p>Chicken?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm .
What would the ancestor of all domestic cattle taste like .
Hmm.Chicken ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm.
What would the ancestor of all domestic cattle taste like.
Hmm.Chicken?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843688</id>
	<title>Re:Scientist comments on story</title>
	<author>tbradshaw</author>
	<datestamp>1264068780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm under the impression that projects like this are generally taken on by cross-disciplinary teams, scientists is a general term that works nicely for a term that includes geneticists, biologists, experimental/rigorous breeders, etc.</p><p>I mean, it's clear that the people undertaking this project are "doing science", it's hard to say for sure (especially as an uninformed reporter) exactly what kind of scientists are doing the work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm under the impression that projects like this are generally taken on by cross-disciplinary teams , scientists is a general term that works nicely for a term that includes geneticists , biologists , experimental/rigorous breeders , etc.I mean , it 's clear that the people undertaking this project are " doing science " , it 's hard to say for sure ( especially as an uninformed reporter ) exactly what kind of scientists are doing the work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm under the impression that projects like this are generally taken on by cross-disciplinary teams, scientists is a general term that works nicely for a term that includes geneticists, biologists, experimental/rigorous breeders, etc.I mean, it's clear that the people undertaking this project are "doing science", it's hard to say for sure (especially as an uninformed reporter) exactly what kind of scientists are doing the work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842192</id>
	<title>99\%?</title>
	<author>telomerewhythere</author>
	<datestamp>1264008720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know it's no longer accurate, but for the longest geneticists thought humans and chimps were 99\% similar genetically.... but there does seem to be a gulf...
</p><p>OTOH, in unrelated cow developments, (not new) is the <a href="http://www.doobybrain.com/2008/02/15/belgian-blue-meet-the-super-cow/" title="doobybrain.com" rel="nofollow">Super Cow</a> [doobybrain.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know it 's no longer accurate , but for the longest geneticists thought humans and chimps were 99 \ % similar genetically.... but there does seem to be a gulf.. . OTOH , in unrelated cow developments , ( not new ) is the Super Cow [ doobybrain.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know it's no longer accurate, but for the longest geneticists thought humans and chimps were 99\% similar genetically.... but there does seem to be a gulf...
OTOH, in unrelated cow developments, (not new) is the Super Cow [doobybrain.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843674</id>
	<title>A small, but friendly note about spelling</title>
	<author>jandersen</author>
	<datestamp>1264068480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is called <b>aurochs</b>, not "auroch", as one would realize by clicking the Wikipedia link provided. It is a German word and means "Ancient Ox".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is called aurochs , not " auroch " , as one would realize by clicking the Wikipedia link provided .
It is a German word and means " Ancient Ox " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is called aurochs, not "auroch", as one would realize by clicking the Wikipedia link provided.
It is a German word and means "Ancient Ox".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843592</id>
	<title>99\%?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264067220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>well, it worked perfectly in jurassic park!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>well , it worked perfectly in jurassic park !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well, it worked perfectly in jurassic park!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30847632</id>
	<title>This has been done</title>
	<author>mothrsuperior</author>
	<datestamp>1264096800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heck\_cattle" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heck\_cattle</a> [wikipedia.org] <br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>Heck Cattle are the result of an attempt to breed back the aurochs from modern aurochs-derived cattle. For this reason, they are also known as "Reconstructed Aurochs".[1]</p></div></blockquote><blockquote><div><p>The reconstructed aurochs fitted into the Nazi propaganda drive to create an idyllic history of the Aryan Nation.[3][4]</p></div></blockquote><p>I wouldn't claim that they have been completely successful, however this is a fairly interesting historical note.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heck \ _cattle [ wikipedia.org ]   Heck Cattle are the result of an attempt to breed back the aurochs from modern aurochs-derived cattle .
For this reason , they are also known as " Reconstructed Aurochs " .
[ 1 ] The reconstructed aurochs fitted into the Nazi propaganda drive to create an idyllic history of the Aryan Nation .
[ 3 ] [ 4 ] I would n't claim that they have been completely successful , however this is a fairly interesting historical note .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heck\_cattle [wikipedia.org] 
  Heck Cattle are the result of an attempt to breed back the aurochs from modern aurochs-derived cattle.
For this reason, they are also known as "Reconstructed Aurochs".
[1]The reconstructed aurochs fitted into the Nazi propaganda drive to create an idyllic history of the Aryan Nation.
[3][4]I wouldn't claim that they have been completely successful, however this is a fairly interesting historical note.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842202</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1264008840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm.  What would the ancestor of all domestic cattle taste like.  Hmm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm .
What would the ancestor of all domestic cattle taste like .
Hmm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm.
What would the ancestor of all domestic cattle taste like.
Hmm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846544</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>The Hooloovoo</author>
	<datestamp>1264092300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you know who <i>else</i> tried to bring back aurochs?
<br> <br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heck\_cattle" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">That's right, Hitler!</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you know who else tried to bring back aurochs ?
That 's right , Hitler !
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you know who else tried to bring back aurochs?
That's right, Hitler!
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844752</id>
	<title>I for one welcome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264082460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Our gigantic bovine overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Our gigantic bovine overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our gigantic bovine overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842890</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264014600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a sad day for slashdot when an obvious troll is marked neither funny, troll, or flamebait, and only insightful and informative.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a sad day for slashdot when an obvious troll is marked neither funny , troll , or flamebait , and only insightful and informative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a sad day for slashdot when an obvious troll is marked neither funny, troll, or flamebait, and only insightful and informative.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842684</id>
	<title>So, it's confirmed.</title>
	<author>Tibia1</author>
	<datestamp>1264012680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Italians are creating weapons of mass destruction. Send in the troops.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Italians are creating weapons of mass destruction .
Send in the troops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Italians are creating weapons of mass destruction.
Send in the troops.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846872</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264093920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They're not going to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurassic\_Park\_(franchise)#Jurassic\_Park\_IV" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">hunt you down</a> [wikipedia.org] in trained squads.</p></div><p>Oh no?</p><p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/humor/2010/01/18/100118sh\_shouts\_allen" title="newyorker.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.newyorker.com/humor/2010/01/18/100118sh\_shouts\_allen</a> [newyorker.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're not going to hunt you down [ wikipedia.org ] in trained squads.Oh no ? http : //www.newyorker.com/humor/2010/01/18/100118sh \ _shouts \ _allen [ newyorker.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're not going to hunt you down [wikipedia.org] in trained squads.Oh no?http://www.newyorker.com/humor/2010/01/18/100118sh\_shouts\_allen [newyorker.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844556</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>Pictish Prince</author>
	<datestamp>1264080360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually in this case it was the second thing everyone said.  The first (usually taking second place) was, "I wonder what they taste like."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually in this case it was the second thing everyone said .
The first ( usually taking second place ) was , " I wonder what they taste like .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually in this case it was the second thing everyone said.
The first (usually taking second place) was, "I wonder what they taste like.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843210</id>
	<title>Re:1\% is a huge difference in terms of DNA</title>
	<author>treeves</author>
	<datestamp>1264105560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah,<br>don't we often hear how humans and chimpanzees share something like &gt;95\% of their DNA?<br>And where is the jurassicpark tag?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah,do n't we often hear how humans and chimpanzees share something like &gt; 95 \ % of their DNA ? And where is the jurassicpark tag ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah,don't we often hear how humans and chimpanzees share something like &gt;95\% of their DNA?And where is the jurassicpark tag?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844940</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>Pharmboy</author>
	<datestamp>1264084140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, being delicious may make them go from being extict-&gt;recreated-&gt;common.  Look at the mighty buffalo of the midwest.  They were on the edge of extiction until they were commercially marketed, which made it viable to raise them as livestock, which made their numbers swell.  In many parts of central USA you can buy buffalo meat, which many say is very lean and good tasting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , being delicious may make them go from being extict- &gt; recreated- &gt; common .
Look at the mighty buffalo of the midwest .
They were on the edge of extiction until they were commercially marketed , which made it viable to raise them as livestock , which made their numbers swell .
In many parts of central USA you can buy buffalo meat , which many say is very lean and good tasting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, being delicious may make them go from being extict-&gt;recreated-&gt;common.
Look at the mighty buffalo of the midwest.
They were on the edge of extiction until they were commercially marketed, which made it viable to raise them as livestock, which made their numbers swell.
In many parts of central USA you can buy buffalo meat, which many say is very lean and good tasting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842468</id>
	<title>Re:Scientist comments on story</title>
	<author>The Wild Norseman</author>
	<datestamp>1264010820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Saying that Scientists are going to do it is an overused catch-all phrase that doesn't actually add any information.</p> </div><p>

"All those scientists, they're all alike!  They say they're working for us.  What they really want is to rule the world!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Saying that Scientists are going to do it is an overused catch-all phrase that does n't actually add any information .
" All those scientists , they 're all alike !
They say they 're working for us .
What they really want is to rule the world !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Saying that Scientists are going to do it is an overused catch-all phrase that doesn't actually add any information.
"All those scientists, they're all alike!
They say they're working for us.
What they really want is to rule the world!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846426</id>
	<title>spellcheck overlords</title>
	<author>hort\_wort</author>
	<datestamp>1264091820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So when these Auroch things are alive again, are the spellchecker overlords going to add them to the list?  I see they get a red line for me today.  Those guys read this site, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So when these Auroch things are alive again , are the spellchecker overlords going to add them to the list ?
I see they get a red line for me today .
Those guys read this site , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So when these Auroch things are alive again, are the spellchecker overlords going to add them to the list?
I see they get a red line for me today.
Those guys read this site, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842230</id>
	<title>Great idea!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264009020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now we just use the DNA from a frog to fill in the gaps and........</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now we just use the DNA from a frog to fill in the gaps and....... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now we just use the DNA from a frog to fill in the gaps and........</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846158</id>
	<title>Mod parent up</title>
	<author>dstech</author>
	<datestamp>1264090560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, I couldn't read the article... every time they wrote 'auroch' instead of 'aurochs', I cringed a little.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , I could n't read the article... every time they wrote 'auroch ' instead of 'aurochs ' , I cringed a little .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, I couldn't read the article... every time they wrote 'auroch' instead of 'aurochs', I cringed a little.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30847148</id>
	<title>Re:99\%?</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1264095060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>The super cow is not new at all - apt has had it for ages.<br><br>meersjo@soulcake-duck:~$ apt-get help<br>[...]<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;This APT has Super Cow Powers.<br>meersjo@soulcake-duck:~$ apt-get moo<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(\_\_)<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(oo)<br>&nbsp; &nbsp;/------\/<br>&nbsp; / |&nbsp; &nbsp; ||<br> *&nbsp;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/\---/\<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; ~~&nbsp; &nbsp;~~<br>...."Have you mooed today?"...<br></tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>The super cow is not new at all - apt has had it for ages.meersjo @ soulcake-duck : ~ $ apt-get help [ ... ]                         This APT has Super Cow Powers.meersjo @ soulcake-duck : ~ $ apt-get moo           ( \ _ \ _ )           ( oo )     /------ \ /   / |     | | *   / \ ---/ \     ~ ~     ~ ~ .... " Have you mooed today ?
" .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The super cow is not new at all - apt has had it for ages.meersjo@soulcake-duck:~$ apt-get help[...]                       This APT has Super Cow Powers.meersjo@soulcake-duck:~$ apt-get moo         (\_\_)         (oo)   /------\/  / |    || *  /\---/\    ~~   ~~...."Have you mooed today?
"...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842816</id>
	<title>Is 99\% enough?-Meet eater.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264013820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>See, given that our genetic similarity so many known animals is at least 95\%, would 99\% of the dna really be enough to recreate the animal?  It appears as though small differences (1\% of a very large number of genes is a large number of genes) are sufficient to make a new species, or, most likely, a non-functioning animal.</p><p>Would love to be proved wrong.</p></div><p>I suspect that one percent is what kept the normally docile Auroch from eating congregations of businessmen.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>See , given that our genetic similarity so many known animals is at least 95 \ % , would 99 \ % of the dna really be enough to recreate the animal ?
It appears as though small differences ( 1 \ % of a very large number of genes is a large number of genes ) are sufficient to make a new species , or , most likely , a non-functioning animal.Would love to be proved wrong.I suspect that one percent is what kept the normally docile Auroch from eating congregations of businessmen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See, given that our genetic similarity so many known animals is at least 95\%, would 99\% of the dna really be enough to recreate the animal?
It appears as though small differences (1\% of a very large number of genes is a large number of genes) are sufficient to make a new species, or, most likely, a non-functioning animal.Would love to be proved wrong.I suspect that one percent is what kept the normally docile Auroch from eating congregations of businessmen.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843070</id>
	<title>Aurochs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264017000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's called an <a href="http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers/Image.ashx?multiverseid=184712&amp;type=card" title="wizards.com">aurochs</a> [wizards.com]. Research fail.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called an aurochs [ wizards.com ] .
Research fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called an aurochs [wizards.com].
Research fail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842564</id>
	<title>Re:Scientist comments on story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264011540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>New Zealanders.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>New Zealanders .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>New Zealanders.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846820</id>
	<title>They are</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264093680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The cross-breed produced republicans.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The cross-breed produced republicans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The cross-breed produced republicans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30859960</id>
	<title>Moving on...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264178520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Auroch is great, but I would like to see them recreate the Great Pumpkin.  It was ten feet tall at its shoulders and could be turned into over 1000 pumpkin pies.  Not sure if they have recovered the DNA though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Auroch is great , but I would like to see them recreate the Great Pumpkin .
It was ten feet tall at its shoulders and could be turned into over 1000 pumpkin pies .
Not sure if they have recovered the DNA though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Auroch is great, but I would like to see them recreate the Great Pumpkin.
It was ten feet tall at its shoulders and could be turned into over 1000 pumpkin pies.
Not sure if they have recovered the DNA though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842334</id>
	<title>via bbc iplayer get it while you can</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264009800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>A 30min radio offering via bbc iplayer <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00hc946/b00hc6xc/Jon\_Ronson\_and\_the\_Quest\_for\_the\_Aryan\_Cow/" title="bbc.co.uk">http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00hc946/b00hc6xc/Jon\_Ronson\_and\_the\_Quest\_for\_the\_Aryan\_Cow/</a> [bbc.co.uk] (runs until 9:32pm Thursday 21st January 2010 )  covers the trip to Munich Zoo by John Ronson. "Jon Ronson investigates the controversial story of the work of Lutz Heck, the director of Berlin Zoo who attempted to resurrect several pure-blooded, extinct animal species as part of the Nazi programme to control the genetic destiny of all creation.

He visits Munich Zoo, which proudly advertises its 'formerly extinct aurochs' - a type of large and powerful cow - but does not refer to the fact that behind this apparent triumph lies the story of Heck's collusion with Goering's aspiration to replace Europe's 'racially degenerate' wildlife and plant life with pure, 'noble' and extinct species."</htmltext>
<tokenext>A 30min radio offering via bbc iplayer http : //www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00hc946/b00hc6xc/Jon \ _Ronson \ _and \ _the \ _Quest \ _for \ _the \ _Aryan \ _Cow/ [ bbc.co.uk ] ( runs until 9 : 32pm Thursday 21st January 2010 ) covers the trip to Munich Zoo by John Ronson .
" Jon Ronson investigates the controversial story of the work of Lutz Heck , the director of Berlin Zoo who attempted to resurrect several pure-blooded , extinct animal species as part of the Nazi programme to control the genetic destiny of all creation .
He visits Munich Zoo , which proudly advertises its 'formerly extinct aurochs ' - a type of large and powerful cow - but does not refer to the fact that behind this apparent triumph lies the story of Heck 's collusion with Goering 's aspiration to replace Europe 's 'racially degenerate ' wildlife and plant life with pure , 'noble ' and extinct species .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A 30min radio offering via bbc iplayer http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00hc946/b00hc6xc/Jon\_Ronson\_and\_the\_Quest\_for\_the\_Aryan\_Cow/ [bbc.co.uk] (runs until 9:32pm Thursday 21st January 2010 )  covers the trip to Munich Zoo by John Ronson.
"Jon Ronson investigates the controversial story of the work of Lutz Heck, the director of Berlin Zoo who attempted to resurrect several pure-blooded, extinct animal species as part of the Nazi programme to control the genetic destiny of all creation.
He visits Munich Zoo, which proudly advertises its 'formerly extinct aurochs' - a type of large and powerful cow - but does not refer to the fact that behind this apparent triumph lies the story of Heck's collusion with Goering's aspiration to replace Europe's 'racially degenerate' wildlife and plant life with pure, 'noble' and extinct species.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270</id>
	<title>Scientist comments on story</title>
	<author>cgenman</author>
	<datestamp>1264009380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A bit offtopic, I know, but can we please stop referring to everyone and everything as scientists?  If you need better terms, try "Geneticists" or "Breeders" or "Italians."  Saying that Scientists are going to do it is an overused catch-all phrase that doesn't actually add any information.  What, could it have been that Creationists were going to breed the auroch from extinction?  Linguists?  Liberal arts majors?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A bit offtopic , I know , but can we please stop referring to everyone and everything as scientists ?
If you need better terms , try " Geneticists " or " Breeders " or " Italians .
" Saying that Scientists are going to do it is an overused catch-all phrase that does n't actually add any information .
What , could it have been that Creationists were going to breed the auroch from extinction ?
Linguists ? Liberal arts majors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A bit offtopic, I know, but can we please stop referring to everyone and everything as scientists?
If you need better terms, try "Geneticists" or "Breeders" or "Italians.
"  Saying that Scientists are going to do it is an overused catch-all phrase that doesn't actually add any information.
What, could it have been that Creationists were going to breed the auroch from extinction?
Linguists?  Liberal arts majors?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844992</id>
	<title>I, for one...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264084620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Welcome our bovine overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome our bovine overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome our bovine overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30856316</id>
	<title>Oh to be an auroch ...</title>
	<author>RockDoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1264094880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that the bovine blow-job artists of SlashDot are queueing up, on their knees, to give my member a taste. Do you plan to spit, or to swallow?</p><blockquote><div><p>Wonder what it tastes like?<br>[*Gets in line first*]</p><blockquote><div><p>I've seen videos like that.</p></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that the bovine blow-job artists of SlashDot are queueing up , on their knees , to give my member a taste .
Do you plan to spit , or to swallow ? Wonder what it tastes like ?
[ * Gets in line first * ] I 've seen videos like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that the bovine blow-job artists of SlashDot are queueing up, on their knees, to give my member a taste.
Do you plan to spit, or to swallow?Wonder what it tastes like?
[*Gets in line first*]I've seen videos like that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842212</id>
	<title>Asterix</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264008900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't some fat Roman governor serve aurochs at an orgy in Asterix in Helvetia?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't some fat Roman governor serve aurochs at an orgy in Asterix in Helvetia ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't some fat Roman governor serve aurochs at an orgy in Asterix in Helvetia?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842120</id>
	<title>Sweet!</title>
	<author>millennial</author>
	<datestamp>1264008000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I bet they're delicious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet they 're delicious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet they're delicious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843600</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>IrquiM</author>
	<datestamp>1264067280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That depends on in which animal they find the missing 1\% DNA</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That depends on in which animal they find the missing 1 \ % DNA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That depends on in which animal they find the missing 1\% DNA</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842990</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>Happy-R-BOB</author>
	<datestamp>1264016040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yum gotta get me some Meef Tacos! They're so good, they're extinct! I bet it will be a limited time offer too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yum got ta get me some Meef Tacos !
They 're so good , they 're extinct !
I bet it will be a limited time offer too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yum gotta get me some Meef Tacos!
They're so good, they're extinct!
I bet it will be a limited time offer too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30850062</id>
	<title>Re:Is 99\% enough?</title>
	<author>igadget78</author>
	<datestamp>1264107300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They can just fill in the missing 1\% with frog DNA.</p></div><p>We are eventually going to have Dinosaurs on this dinosaur tour?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They can just fill in the missing 1 \ % with frog DNA.We are eventually going to have Dinosaurs on this dinosaur tour ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can just fill in the missing 1\% with frog DNA.We are eventually going to have Dinosaurs on this dinosaur tour?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843936</id>
	<title>Re:Is 99\% enough?</title>
	<author>AniVisual</author>
	<datestamp>1264072080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> What's the worst that could happen to our cow? Croak like a bullfrog? </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the worst that could happen to our cow ?
Croak like a bullfrog ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> What's the worst that could happen to our cow?
Croak like a bullfrog? </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844792</id>
	<title>Re:Already Been Done, Seventy Years Ago</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1264083000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you're saying this is kind of like BSD and Linux.  There should have been only *one* effort to resurrect Unix, a commercially extinct operating system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 're saying this is kind of like BSD and Linux .
There should have been only * one * effort to resurrect Unix , a commercially extinct operating system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you're saying this is kind of like BSD and Linux.
There should have been only *one* effort to resurrect Unix, a commercially extinct operating system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845432</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264087320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From historical accounts, it tastes similar to whale.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From historical accounts , it tastes similar to whale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From historical accounts, it tastes similar to whale.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844552</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>machine321</author>
	<datestamp>1264080300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can industry be trusted to act responsibly?</p></div><p>No, unless it increases short-term value for its stockholders.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can industry be trusted to act responsibly ? No , unless it increases short-term value for its stockholders .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can industry be trusted to act responsibly?No, unless it increases short-term value for its stockholders.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842382</id>
	<title>Already Been Done, Seventy Years Ago</title>
	<author>Dunx</author>
	<datestamp>1264010160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is great and all, but it's also something that the Nazis were doing before WWII - there are quite a lot of these Heck cattle still around. There was even a radio programme on the BBC about it a week or so ago.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heck\_cattle" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heck\_cattle</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Maybe the Italians and the Poles are using a technique closer to cloning, but why then talk about breeding back - the same methodology that the Hecks used?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is great and all , but it 's also something that the Nazis were doing before WWII - there are quite a lot of these Heck cattle still around .
There was even a radio programme on the BBC about it a week or so ago.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heck \ _cattle [ wikipedia.org ] Maybe the Italians and the Poles are using a technique closer to cloning , but why then talk about breeding back - the same methodology that the Hecks used ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is great and all, but it's also something that the Nazis were doing before WWII - there are quite a lot of these Heck cattle still around.
There was even a radio programme on the BBC about it a week or so ago.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heck\_cattle [wikipedia.org]Maybe the Italians and the Poles are using a technique closer to cloning, but why then talk about breeding back - the same methodology that the Hecks used?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842184</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264008720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bring it back so that we can eat it to extinction like the carrier piegon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bring it back so that we can eat it to extinction like the carrier piegon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bring it back so that we can eat it to extinction like the carrier piegon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845976</id>
	<title>Re:Scientist comments on story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264089840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well there was my DNA....<br>And then there was her DNA.....<br>And now nine months later we have this new DNA.....<br>So what am I? Scientist or Geneticists?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well there was my DNA....And then there was her DNA.....And now nine months later we have this new DNA.....So what am I ?
Scientist or Geneticists ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well there was my DNA....And then there was her DNA.....And now nine months later we have this new DNA.....So what am I?
Scientist or Geneticists?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844998</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1264084680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jurassic Park is just one example of many.  People have countless idiotic notions about "cloning" that have nothing to do with Chrichton's fiction (e.g. it'll lead to overpopulation, a clone will know everything the original does).  There's a whole lot of Hollywood (and just plain ignorance about biology) to blame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jurassic Park is just one example of many .
People have countless idiotic notions about " cloning " that have nothing to do with Chrichton 's fiction ( e.g .
it 'll lead to overpopulation , a clone will know everything the original does ) .
There 's a whole lot of Hollywood ( and just plain ignorance about biology ) to blame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jurassic Park is just one example of many.
People have countless idiotic notions about "cloning" that have nothing to do with Chrichton's fiction (e.g.
it'll lead to overpopulation, a clone will know everything the original does).
There's a whole lot of Hollywood (and just plain ignorance about biology) to blame.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30853646</id>
	<title>Re:Scientist comments on story</title>
	<author>fishexe</author>
	<datestamp>1264075920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A bit offtopic, I know, but can we please stop referring to everyone and everything as scientists?  If you need better terms, try "Geneticists" or "Breeders" or "Italians."</p></div><p>Sure.  Scientists are working on the problem right now.  Before you know it, scientists will have replaced all references to scientists with references to Italians.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A bit offtopic , I know , but can we please stop referring to everyone and everything as scientists ?
If you need better terms , try " Geneticists " or " Breeders " or " Italians. " Sure .
Scientists are working on the problem right now .
Before you know it , scientists will have replaced all references to scientists with references to Italians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A bit offtopic, I know, but can we please stop referring to everyone and everything as scientists?
If you need better terms, try "Geneticists" or "Breeders" or "Italians."Sure.
Scientists are working on the problem right now.
Before you know it, scientists will have replaced all references to scientists with references to Italians.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843570</id>
	<title>Re:Is 99\% enough?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264066980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasn't there an article a while ago about 8\% of human DNA being from viruses? While it isn't that simple (some DNA is new, other just has been modified...), 99\% similar DNA could bring them closer to aurochs than we are to humans who lived a few thousand years ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't there an article a while ago about 8 \ % of human DNA being from viruses ?
While it is n't that simple ( some DNA is new , other just has been modified... ) , 99 \ % similar DNA could bring them closer to aurochs than we are to humans who lived a few thousand years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't there an article a while ago about 8\% of human DNA being from viruses?
While it isn't that simple (some DNA is new, other just has been modified...), 99\% similar DNA could bring them closer to aurochs than we are to humans who lived a few thousand years ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842392</id>
	<title>...and only 1\% frog DNA.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264010280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What could *possibly* go wrong?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What could * possibly * go wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What could *possibly* go wrong?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843264</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264106220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Honestly I blame Jurassic Park and Michael Chrichton for spreading false and completely useless tales about science gone wrong. He's the reason its hard to work on cloning things and any number of other supposedly taboo subjects of which the general populace's only knowledge comes from patently false pulp mulched out by him and others like him.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Honestly I blame Jurassic Park and Michael Chrichton for spreading false and completely useless tales about science gone wrong .
He 's the reason its hard to work on cloning things and any number of other supposedly taboo subjects of which the general populace 's only knowledge comes from patently false pulp mulched out by him and others like him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honestly I blame Jurassic Park and Michael Chrichton for spreading false and completely useless tales about science gone wrong.
He's the reason its hard to work on cloning things and any number of other supposedly taboo subjects of which the general populace's only knowledge comes from patently false pulp mulched out by him and others like him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194</id>
	<title>Is 99\% enough?</title>
	<author>ustolemyname</author>
	<datestamp>1264008720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>See, given that our genetic similarity so many known animals is at least 95\%, would 99\% of the dna really be enough to recreate the animal?  It appears as though small differences (1\% of a very large number of genes is a large number of genes) are sufficient to make a new species, or, most likely, a non-functioning animal.<br> <br>Would love to be proved wrong.</htmltext>
<tokenext>See , given that our genetic similarity so many known animals is at least 95 \ % , would 99 \ % of the dna really be enough to recreate the animal ?
It appears as though small differences ( 1 \ % of a very large number of genes is a large number of genes ) are sufficient to make a new species , or , most likely , a non-functioning animal .
Would love to be proved wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See, given that our genetic similarity so many known animals is at least 95\%, would 99\% of the dna really be enough to recreate the animal?
It appears as though small differences (1\% of a very large number of genes is a large number of genes) are sufficient to make a new species, or, most likely, a non-functioning animal.
Would love to be proved wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30847648</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>edrobinson</author>
	<datestamp>1264096860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know damn well it tastes like chicken!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know damn well it tastes like chicken !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know damn well it tastes like chicken!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843606</id>
	<title>Re:Is 99\% enough?</title>
	<author>JasterBobaMereel</author>
	<datestamp>1264067460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Aurochs is extinct there is no DNA to compare to, what you will get is yet another variant of Heck Cattle, i.e. another breed of cattle</p><p>You cannot "breed back" to an extinct species, what you will get at best is an animal similar in most respects to the original, but since the original died out so long ago there is very little information left about it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p><p>Guesswork plus a discredited theory does not equal resurrection of an extinct species</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Aurochs is extinct there is no DNA to compare to , what you will get is yet another variant of Heck Cattle , i.e .
another breed of cattleYou can not " breed back " to an extinct species , what you will get at best is an animal similar in most respects to the original , but since the original died out so long ago there is very little information left about it ....Guesswork plus a discredited theory does not equal resurrection of an extinct species</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Aurochs is extinct there is no DNA to compare to, what you will get is yet another variant of Heck Cattle, i.e.
another breed of cattleYou cannot "breed back" to an extinct species, what you will get at best is an animal similar in most respects to the original, but since the original died out so long ago there is very little information left about it ....Guesswork plus a discredited theory does not equal resurrection of an extinct species</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842204</id>
	<title>What about the dodo?</title>
	<author>um\_atrain</author>
	<datestamp>1264008840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Their small, portable, cute, and probably taste like chicken!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Their small , portable , cute , and probably taste like chicken !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their small, portable, cute, and probably taste like chicken!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844232</id>
	<title>Re:Is 99\% enough?</title>
	<author>ectoraige</author>
	<datestamp>1264075740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Surely there's some raptor DNA available; what could possibly go wrong?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Surely there 's some raptor DNA available ; what could possibly go wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surely there's some raptor DNA available; what could possibly go wrong?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843986</id>
	<title>Re:Scientist comments on story</title>
	<author>SunTzuWarmaster</author>
	<datestamp>1264072860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Scientists report that scientists are doing studies on monkeys to see if monkeys would make good scientists.  It's not all good news though, some scientists may be out of a job.  Unless, of course, they happen to be monkeys.</p><p>Courtesy of the Brak show.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scientists report that scientists are doing studies on monkeys to see if monkeys would make good scientists .
It 's not all good news though , some scientists may be out of a job .
Unless , of course , they happen to be monkeys.Courtesy of the Brak show .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scientists report that scientists are doing studies on monkeys to see if monkeys would make good scientists.
It's not all good news though, some scientists may be out of a job.
Unless, of course, they happen to be monkeys.Courtesy of the Brak show.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842810</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>omfgnosis</author>
	<datestamp>1264013760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jurassic Park needn't be taken literally for it to be a good parable about why we should be concerned that toying with life and death can have unforeseen consequences.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jurassic Park need n't be taken literally for it to be a good parable about why we should be concerned that toying with life and death can have unforeseen consequences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jurassic Park needn't be taken literally for it to be a good parable about why we should be concerned that toying with life and death can have unforeseen consequences.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844832</id>
	<title>Re:Size</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1264083420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are comparing outliers with averages, and the results of centuries of breeding with an undomesticated species.  I have the feeling that an auroch herd bull might be a *bit* more substantial than the average cow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are comparing outliers with averages , and the results of centuries of breeding with an undomesticated species .
I have the feeling that an auroch herd bull might be a * bit * more substantial than the average cow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are comparing outliers with averages, and the results of centuries of breeding with an undomesticated species.
I have the feeling that an auroch herd bull might be a *bit* more substantial than the average cow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842820</id>
	<title>Re:Already Been Done, Seventy Years Ago</title>
	<author>Daniel Dvorkin</author>
	<datestamp>1264013880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The main difference, I think -- besides the fact that the Nazis were motivated by loony ideology and the modern researchers, presumably, are motivated by scientific curiosity -- is that the Hecks could only breed for phenotype, while the groups currently working on the problem are breeding for genotype.  A project like this is really impossible without modern DNA sequencing technology.</p><p>That being said, it would be interesting to know how close the Hecks got.  The Wiki article doesn't mention if there's been any comparison of the Heck genome to the reconstructed aurochs genome; I'd like to know the results of such a study.</p><p>It's also amusing to speculate what would have happened if sequencing <b>had</b> been available back then.  Der Fuehrer's apoplexy upon learning that an awful lot of the Jews and Slavs he was bent on exterminating were genetically indistinguishable from the general German population would have been a site to behold.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The main difference , I think -- besides the fact that the Nazis were motivated by loony ideology and the modern researchers , presumably , are motivated by scientific curiosity -- is that the Hecks could only breed for phenotype , while the groups currently working on the problem are breeding for genotype .
A project like this is really impossible without modern DNA sequencing technology.That being said , it would be interesting to know how close the Hecks got .
The Wiki article does n't mention if there 's been any comparison of the Heck genome to the reconstructed aurochs genome ; I 'd like to know the results of such a study.It 's also amusing to speculate what would have happened if sequencing had been available back then .
Der Fuehrer 's apoplexy upon learning that an awful lot of the Jews and Slavs he was bent on exterminating were genetically indistinguishable from the general German population would have been a site to behold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The main difference, I think -- besides the fact that the Nazis were motivated by loony ideology and the modern researchers, presumably, are motivated by scientific curiosity -- is that the Hecks could only breed for phenotype, while the groups currently working on the problem are breeding for genotype.
A project like this is really impossible without modern DNA sequencing technology.That being said, it would be interesting to know how close the Hecks got.
The Wiki article doesn't mention if there's been any comparison of the Heck genome to the reconstructed aurochs genome; I'd like to know the results of such a study.It's also amusing to speculate what would have happened if sequencing had been available back then.
Der Fuehrer's apoplexy upon learning that an awful lot of the Jews and Slavs he was bent on exterminating were genetically indistinguishable from the general German population would have been a site to behold.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30850366</id>
	<title>Jurassic Barbeque!!</title>
	<author>LanMan04</author>
	<datestamp>1264065240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://wearscience.com/design/jurassic/" title="wearscience.com">http://wearscience.com/design/jurassic/</a> [wearscience.com]</p><p>Proud owner of one.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //wearscience.com/design/jurassic/ [ wearscience.com ] Proud owner of one .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://wearscience.com/design/jurassic/ [wearscience.com]Proud owner of one.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30849034</id>
	<title>Re:1\% is a huge difference in terms of DNA</title>
	<author>Grishnakh</author>
	<datestamp>1264102980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hopefully they could use the technology to bring back some other extinct species, such as the passenger pigeon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully they could use the technology to bring back some other extinct species , such as the passenger pigeon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully they could use the technology to bring back some other extinct species, such as the passenger pigeon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842778</id>
	<title>Re:Scientist comments on story</title>
	<author>forkazoo</author>
	<datestamp>1264013520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What, could it have been that Creationists were going to breed the auroch from extinction? Linguists? Liberal arts majors?</p></div></blockquote><p>That's absurd.  Creationists, Linguists, and Liberal Arts Majors don't try to breed cows!  They try to breed with them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What , could it have been that Creationists were going to breed the auroch from extinction ?
Linguists ? Liberal arts majors ? That 's absurd .
Creationists , Linguists , and Liberal Arts Majors do n't try to breed cows !
They try to breed with them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, could it have been that Creationists were going to breed the auroch from extinction?
Linguists? Liberal arts majors?That's absurd.
Creationists, Linguists, and Liberal Arts Majors don't try to breed cows!
They try to breed with them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30850864</id>
	<title>Can we get?</title>
	<author>SebaSOFT</author>
	<datestamp>1264067040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How much time until we get some Phorusrhacidae to take over the world?</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phorusrhacidae" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phorusrhacidae</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How much time until we get some Phorusrhacidae to take over the world ? http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phorusrhacidae [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much time until we get some Phorusrhacidae to take over the world?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phorusrhacidae [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842704</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>Jeremy Erwin</author>
	<datestamp>1264012800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gamey and tough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gamey and tough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gamey and tough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845606</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>stuntpope</author>
	<datestamp>1264088220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you are confused with the passenger pigeon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you are confused with the passenger pigeon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you are confused with the passenger pigeon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844850</id>
	<title>Medieval Park</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1264083540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm more concerned that these biologists will implement a Tron-inspired 3D file browser that pre-teen female Unix haxors will know how to use.  Other than that, I'm ready to buy my tickets to Medieval Park.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm more concerned that these biologists will implement a Tron-inspired 3D file browser that pre-teen female Unix haxors will know how to use .
Other than that , I 'm ready to buy my tickets to Medieval Park .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm more concerned that these biologists will implement a Tron-inspired 3D file browser that pre-teen female Unix haxors will know how to use.
Other than that, I'm ready to buy my tickets to Medieval Park.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845968</id>
	<title>99\%?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1264089840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With human DNA of that quality, you could as well get any other type of ape out.</p><p>Sorry, 99\% is not even close to enough. Try more like 99.99999\%</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With human DNA of that quality , you could as well get any other type of ape out.Sorry , 99 \ % is not even close to enough .
Try more like 99.99999 \ %</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With human DNA of that quality, you could as well get any other type of ape out.Sorry, 99\% is not even close to enough.
Try more like 99.99999\%</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843932</id>
	<title>Linguist Protest</title>
	<author>dierdorf</author>
	<datestamp>1264072020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm amazed that nobody has commented that one of the beasties is (or was) an AUROCHS, not an "auroch".  Two of 'em would be auroches or aurochsen.  Talking about an "auroch" is like talking about a Chinee or Portugee.  More to the point, it would be like talking about "ock" as the singular of oxen, since "ox" is the second syllable of aurochs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm amazed that nobody has commented that one of the beasties is ( or was ) an AUROCHS , not an " auroch " .
Two of 'em would be auroches or aurochsen .
Talking about an " auroch " is like talking about a Chinee or Portugee .
More to the point , it would be like talking about " ock " as the singular of oxen , since " ox " is the second syllable of aurochs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm amazed that nobody has commented that one of the beasties is (or was) an AUROCHS, not an "auroch".
Two of 'em would be auroches or aurochsen.
Talking about an "auroch" is like talking about a Chinee or Portugee.
More to the point, it would be like talking about "ock" as the singular of oxen, since "ox" is the second syllable of aurochs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843062</id>
	<title>Re:Scientist comments on story</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1264016940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What, could it have been that Creationists were going to breed the auroch from extinction?</p></div><p>Well, no, Creationists pray for it, and get one delivered to them from heavens right there and then.</p><p>In any case, I think that "scientists do $something\_awesome" is a traditional, respected, and still wonderful meme of its own. It reinforces the notion that so many cool things that we have, we owe to science; which just happens to be something well worthy reminding about these days.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What , could it have been that Creationists were going to breed the auroch from extinction ? Well , no , Creationists pray for it , and get one delivered to them from heavens right there and then.In any case , I think that " scientists do $ something \ _awesome " is a traditional , respected , and still wonderful meme of its own .
It reinforces the notion that so many cool things that we have , we owe to science ; which just happens to be something well worthy reminding about these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, could it have been that Creationists were going to breed the auroch from extinction?Well, no, Creationists pray for it, and get one delivered to them from heavens right there and then.In any case, I think that "scientists do $something\_awesome" is a traditional, respected, and still wonderful meme of its own.
It reinforces the notion that so many cool things that we have, we owe to science; which just happens to be something well worthy reminding about these days.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842808</id>
	<title>Re:Already Been Done, Seventy Years Ago</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264013760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's one heck of a cow!</p><p>Sorry, I'll be going now...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's one heck of a cow ! Sorry , I 'll be going now.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's one heck of a cow!Sorry, I'll be going now...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842252</id>
	<title>Re:Is 99\% enough?</title>
	<author>Daniel Dvorkin</author>
	<datestamp>1264009200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Presumably, it depends on <b>which</b> 99\% they've recovered.  If it includes all or most of the genes that make an aurochs an aurochs rather than Bessie, they're good to go.</p><p>Also, TFA says they're not trying to create an aurochs genome de novo.  They're carefully breeding modern cattle to try to get a genome that's as close as possible to the reconstructed aurochs genome.  So the intermediate generations may not be aurochs, exactly, but they won't be nonviable; they'll just be different breeds of cow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Presumably , it depends on which 99 \ % they 've recovered .
If it includes all or most of the genes that make an aurochs an aurochs rather than Bessie , they 're good to go.Also , TFA says they 're not trying to create an aurochs genome de novo .
They 're carefully breeding modern cattle to try to get a genome that 's as close as possible to the reconstructed aurochs genome .
So the intermediate generations may not be aurochs , exactly , but they wo n't be nonviable ; they 'll just be different breeds of cow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presumably, it depends on which 99\% they've recovered.
If it includes all or most of the genes that make an aurochs an aurochs rather than Bessie, they're good to go.Also, TFA says they're not trying to create an aurochs genome de novo.
They're carefully breeding modern cattle to try to get a genome that's as close as possible to the reconstructed aurochs genome.
So the intermediate generations may not be aurochs, exactly, but they won't be nonviable; they'll just be different breeds of cow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843312</id>
	<title>Re:Just because you can ...</title>
	<author>Krupuk</author>
	<datestamp>1264106880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"We do what we must, because we can."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" We do what we must , because we can .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We do what we must, because we can.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118</id>
	<title>Yum</title>
	<author>ari\_j</author>
	<datestamp>1264007940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It sounds delicious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds delicious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds delicious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845110</id>
	<title>Next project</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264085460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>back-breed  from modern Texans to recover a human?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>back-breed from modern Texans to recover a human ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>back-breed  from modern Texans to recover a human?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842398</id>
	<title>Start smaller?</title>
	<author>AlexWillisson</author>
	<datestamp>1264010280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems like it'd be a better idea to start with something that hasn't been extinct for that long, for practice.

I hope they work it out, it'd be cool to see something extinct brought back through science.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems like it 'd be a better idea to start with something that has n't been extinct for that long , for practice .
I hope they work it out , it 'd be cool to see something extinct brought back through science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems like it'd be a better idea to start with something that hasn't been extinct for that long, for practice.
I hope they work it out, it'd be cool to see something extinct brought back through science.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30848446</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1264100220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real question is -- what will they do to the existing ecosystem? they're not the only animal that's either gone extinct or changed its range. What about the predators and plant life and other organisms, not to mention the watershed, that reintroducing such an animal will impact?</p><p>This was not well-examined prior to reintroducing wolves in the Yellowstone area, and now they're a problem, not only to domestic livestock but also to other wild species (there is some thought that the new wolf population could exterminate the elk within a couple generations, at their present rate of unchecked population growth).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real question is -- what will they do to the existing ecosystem ?
they 're not the only animal that 's either gone extinct or changed its range .
What about the predators and plant life and other organisms , not to mention the watershed , that reintroducing such an animal will impact ? This was not well-examined prior to reintroducing wolves in the Yellowstone area , and now they 're a problem , not only to domestic livestock but also to other wild species ( there is some thought that the new wolf population could exterminate the elk within a couple generations , at their present rate of unchecked population growth ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real question is -- what will they do to the existing ecosystem?
they're not the only animal that's either gone extinct or changed its range.
What about the predators and plant life and other organisms, not to mention the watershed, that reintroducing such an animal will impact?This was not well-examined prior to reintroducing wolves in the Yellowstone area, and now they're a problem, not only to domestic livestock but also to other wild species (there is some thought that the new wolf population could exterminate the elk within a couple generations, at their present rate of unchecked population growth).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842312</id>
	<title>Just because you can ...</title>
	<author>wisnoskij</author>
	<datestamp>1264009680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... does not mean you should.<br>
Have these scientists contemplated what could happen if these created creatures escape into the wild breeding amongst themselves and/or other similar species.<br>
Whole ecosystems can be destroyed by introducing one creature into them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... does not mean you should .
Have these scientists contemplated what could happen if these created creatures escape into the wild breeding amongst themselves and/or other similar species .
Whole ecosystems can be destroyed by introducing one creature into them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... does not mean you should.
Have these scientists contemplated what could happen if these created creatures escape into the wild breeding amongst themselves and/or other similar species.
Whole ecosystems can be destroyed by introducing one creature into them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843724</id>
	<title>Re:Is 99\% enough?</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1264069140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More to the point, even if they can the question is how much DNA they can salvage from different individual members of the species.</p><p>The problem with ressurecting a species with cloning and DNA techniques like this is not simply a case of bringing one animal back, but that you need to bring multiple animals back all from different recovered DNA sources.</p><p>The reason for this is because creating clones from a single individual will leave you with a population without any real genetic variability and so you will end up with a population that cannot really evolve to cope with disease and so forth (including those that have arisen since it's extinction). Bringing an individual clone of a species back is one thing, but bringing back a viable population is even more difficult.</p><p>This is why we would struggle even more to bring back longer extinct species like the dodo or the mammoth because we're finding it a hell of a challenge to recover the DNA of just one individual, let alone a batch of individuals with DNA that is distinct enough to create a viable population that's not basically just inbred.</p><p>Of course, that's not to put down the achievement, it's a great first step and hopefully will lead to us producing the technology to bring back entire viable breeding populations that can cope with disease and so forth. It may be that we can even introduce artificial changes to the DNA to artificially create this variability but even that would be difficult to get right to the point we're able to mimic naturally evolved variability between individuals of a species.</p><p>For what it's worth, we've actually had similar problems in the past, where we've had entire types of banana go extinct because they were all clones of each other and hence couldn't resist disease so it's not even a theoretical problem, it can and does happen- you need variability within a species to keep it viable in the long run.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More to the point , even if they can the question is how much DNA they can salvage from different individual members of the species.The problem with ressurecting a species with cloning and DNA techniques like this is not simply a case of bringing one animal back , but that you need to bring multiple animals back all from different recovered DNA sources.The reason for this is because creating clones from a single individual will leave you with a population without any real genetic variability and so you will end up with a population that can not really evolve to cope with disease and so forth ( including those that have arisen since it 's extinction ) .
Bringing an individual clone of a species back is one thing , but bringing back a viable population is even more difficult.This is why we would struggle even more to bring back longer extinct species like the dodo or the mammoth because we 're finding it a hell of a challenge to recover the DNA of just one individual , let alone a batch of individuals with DNA that is distinct enough to create a viable population that 's not basically just inbred.Of course , that 's not to put down the achievement , it 's a great first step and hopefully will lead to us producing the technology to bring back entire viable breeding populations that can cope with disease and so forth .
It may be that we can even introduce artificial changes to the DNA to artificially create this variability but even that would be difficult to get right to the point we 're able to mimic naturally evolved variability between individuals of a species.For what it 's worth , we 've actually had similar problems in the past , where we 've had entire types of banana go extinct because they were all clones of each other and hence could n't resist disease so it 's not even a theoretical problem , it can and does happen- you need variability within a species to keep it viable in the long run .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More to the point, even if they can the question is how much DNA they can salvage from different individual members of the species.The problem with ressurecting a species with cloning and DNA techniques like this is not simply a case of bringing one animal back, but that you need to bring multiple animals back all from different recovered DNA sources.The reason for this is because creating clones from a single individual will leave you with a population without any real genetic variability and so you will end up with a population that cannot really evolve to cope with disease and so forth (including those that have arisen since it's extinction).
Bringing an individual clone of a species back is one thing, but bringing back a viable population is even more difficult.This is why we would struggle even more to bring back longer extinct species like the dodo or the mammoth because we're finding it a hell of a challenge to recover the DNA of just one individual, let alone a batch of individuals with DNA that is distinct enough to create a viable population that's not basically just inbred.Of course, that's not to put down the achievement, it's a great first step and hopefully will lead to us producing the technology to bring back entire viable breeding populations that can cope with disease and so forth.
It may be that we can even introduce artificial changes to the DNA to artificially create this variability but even that would be difficult to get right to the point we're able to mimic naturally evolved variability between individuals of a species.For what it's worth, we've actually had similar problems in the past, where we've had entire types of banana go extinct because they were all clones of each other and hence couldn't resist disease so it's not even a theoretical problem, it can and does happen- you need variability within a species to keep it viable in the long run.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842272</id>
	<title>1\% is a huge difference in terms of DNA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264009380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>99\% may not sound like a huge amount missing, but in terms of DNA with about 3.08x10^9 nucleotides, the missing 1\% is a massive shortfall. Sure, they can take an educated guess at the rest, but then it will never be a real auroch.</p><p>What if they do succeed? What happens then? Do they try to reestablish the species, or will this just be a showpeice? I like cool science, but this seems to be a case of them doing it for no other reason than just because they can.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>99 \ % may not sound like a huge amount missing , but in terms of DNA with about 3.08x10 ^ 9 nucleotides , the missing 1 \ % is a massive shortfall .
Sure , they can take an educated guess at the rest , but then it will never be a real auroch.What if they do succeed ?
What happens then ?
Do they try to reestablish the species , or will this just be a showpeice ?
I like cool science , but this seems to be a case of them doing it for no other reason than just because they can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>99\% may not sound like a huge amount missing, but in terms of DNA with about 3.08x10^9 nucleotides, the missing 1\% is a massive shortfall.
Sure, they can take an educated guess at the rest, but then it will never be a real auroch.What if they do succeed?
What happens then?
Do they try to reestablish the species, or will this just be a showpeice?
I like cool science, but this seems to be a case of them doing it for no other reason than just because they can.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846150</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>damien\_kane</author>
	<datestamp>1264090560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Bring it back so that we can eat it to extinction like the carrier piegon.</p></div><p>You mean to tell me this world has NO CARRIER??<br>
+++</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bring it back so that we can eat it to extinction like the carrier piegon.You mean to tell me this world has NO CARRIER ? ?
+ + +</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bring it back so that we can eat it to extinction like the carrier piegon.You mean to tell me this world has NO CARRIER??
+++
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843356</id>
	<title>Jurassic Park?</title>
	<author>diefuchsjagden</author>
	<datestamp>1264107300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>so long as Frog DNA is not being used to fill that missing 1\% creating both male and female Ancient Giant cows raging through the streets of L.A. killing every one cool by me... What should be down is to cultivate several males and use them in the running of the Bulls in Madrid, SP</htmltext>
<tokenext>so long as Frog DNA is not being used to fill that missing 1 \ % creating both male and female Ancient Giant cows raging through the streets of L.A. killing every one cool by me... What should be down is to cultivate several males and use them in the running of the Bulls in Madrid , SP</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so long as Frog DNA is not being used to fill that missing 1\% creating both male and female Ancient Giant cows raging through the streets of L.A. killing every one cool by me... What should be down is to cultivate several males and use them in the running of the Bulls in Madrid, SP</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30859996</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>Ol Olsoc</author>
	<datestamp>1264178760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll tell you what... They might not taste good!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll tell you what... They might not taste good !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll tell you what... They might not taste good!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30850832</id>
	<title>Re:Problem?</title>
	<author>Explodicle</author>
	<datestamp>1264066920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, we're all out of auroches!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , we 're all out of auroches !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, we're all out of auroches!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844616</id>
	<title>According to this book I read...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264081020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It all began with the aurochs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It all began with the aurochs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It all began with the aurochs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844740</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1264082340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'Toying with life' is one valuable definition of 'life'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'Toying with life ' is one valuable definition of 'life' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Toying with life' is one valuable definition of 'life'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842200</id>
	<title>Spelling</title>
	<author>Fjodor42</author>
	<datestamp>1264008780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aurochs, the "ochs"-part meaning "ox" and the "aur" being a nomer for something like "original" or "ancestral"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aurochs , the " ochs " -part meaning " ox " and the " aur " being a nomer for something like " original " or " ancestral " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aurochs, the "ochs"-part meaning "ox" and the "aur" being a nomer for something like "original" or "ancestral"...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30853006</id>
	<title>Re:Problem?</title>
	<author>Ungrounded Lightning</author>
	<datestamp>1264073640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"researchers in Poland are working on the same problem."</i></p><p><i>Problem?</i></p><p>As in "problems at the end of the chapter to be solved by the student".</p><p>I.e. task where the person(s) doing it may not have all the information and/or understanding up front and thus needs to do some skull sweat and/or research to get it right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" researchers in Poland are working on the same problem .
" Problem ? As in " problems at the end of the chapter to be solved by the student " .I.e .
task where the person ( s ) doing it may not have all the information and/or understanding up front and thus needs to do some skull sweat and/or research to get it right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"researchers in Poland are working on the same problem.
"Problem?As in "problems at the end of the chapter to be solved by the student".I.e.
task where the person(s) doing it may not have all the information and/or understanding up front and thus needs to do some skull sweat and/or research to get it right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846542</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>Nazlfrag</author>
	<datestamp>1264092300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You neglect to consider all the kids inspired into biology and genetics, archaeology &amp; palentology,  and chaos and fractals (ok that guy sucked) and 'It's a Unix system' and off I fly into the filesystem! (ok you might have a point...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You neglect to consider all the kids inspired into biology and genetics , archaeology &amp; palentology , and chaos and fractals ( ok that guy sucked ) and 'It 's a Unix system ' and off I fly into the filesystem !
( ok you might have a point... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You neglect to consider all the kids inspired into biology and genetics, archaeology &amp; palentology,  and chaos and fractals (ok that guy sucked) and 'It's a Unix system' and off I fly into the filesystem!
(ok you might have a point...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844434</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>Whiteox</author>
	<datestamp>1264078980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What could possibly go wrong' implying, of course, that something exceptionally negative will come about as a result of it?</p> </div><p>How about Aurochs with lasers on their heads?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What could possibly go wrong ' implying , of course , that something exceptionally negative will come about as a result of it ?
How about Aurochs with lasers on their heads ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What could possibly go wrong' implying, of course, that something exceptionally negative will come about as a result of it?
How about Aurochs with lasers on their heads?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846690</id>
	<title>It won't be a 'real' Aurochs</title>
	<author>Muad'Dave</author>
	<datestamp>1264093020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TFA states that they're using back-breeding techniques to breed something that resembles an Aurochs, NOT doing nuclear transfer of existing Aurochs DNA.</p><p>Call me when you have the 'real thing', not a cheap Bavarian knockoff.<br>[John Cleese Schweppes commercial reference; no offense to Bavarians, living or dead.]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA states that they 're using back-breeding techniques to breed something that resembles an Aurochs , NOT doing nuclear transfer of existing Aurochs DNA.Call me when you have the 'real thing ' , not a cheap Bavarian knockoff .
[ John Cleese Schweppes commercial reference ; no offense to Bavarians , living or dead .
]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA states that they're using back-breeding techniques to breed something that resembles an Aurochs, NOT doing nuclear transfer of existing Aurochs DNA.Call me when you have the 'real thing', not a cheap Bavarian knockoff.
[John Cleese Schweppes commercial reference; no offense to Bavarians, living or dead.
]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844118</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264074300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bovines? Bringing an extinct species back to life? <a href="http://www.scottsigler.com/ancestor" title="scottsigler.com" rel="nofollow">Being hunted down might not be completely off the cards</a> [scottsigler.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bovines ?
Bringing an extinct species back to life ?
Being hunted down might not be completely off the cards [ scottsigler.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bovines?
Bringing an extinct species back to life?
Being hunted down might not be completely off the cards [scottsigler.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846552</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>Anne\_Nonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264092360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt; Wonder what it tastes like?</p><p>Reportedly it tastes a bit like Spotted Owl with just a hint of Bald Eagle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; Wonder what it tastes like ? Reportedly it tastes a bit like Spotted Owl with just a hint of Bald Eagle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt; Wonder what it tastes like?Reportedly it tastes a bit like Spotted Owl with just a hint of Bald Eagle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842718</id>
	<title>Re:Is 99\% enough?</title>
	<author>rockNme2349</author>
	<datestamp>1264012920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They can just fill in the missing 1\% with frog DNA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They can just fill in the missing 1 \ % with frog DNA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can just fill in the missing 1\% with frog DNA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842534</id>
	<title>Re:Scientist comments on story</title>
	<author>Floritard</author>
	<datestamp>1264011300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But none of those terms so readily prepare my brain to imagine a team of white-coated madmen performing reckless experiments on the fringes of modern technological capability. When I hear "scientists" I get excited like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But none of those terms so readily prepare my brain to imagine a team of white-coated madmen performing reckless experiments on the fringes of modern technological capability .
When I hear " scientists " I get excited like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But none of those terms so readily prepare my brain to imagine a team of white-coated madmen performing reckless experiments on the fringes of modern technological capability.
When I hear "scientists" I get excited like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30851946</id>
	<title>Re:1\% is a huge difference in terms of DNA</title>
	<author>Ungrounded Lightning</author>
	<datestamp>1264070220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>What if they do succeed? What happens then?</i></p><p>Then they have some previously lost genes and gene-combinations to breed into domestic cattle.</p><p>Most of the lost genes will probably be things that got bred out because the alternatives make a better domestic animal.  But some of 'em might be useful "better" stuff that just got lost by chance.</p><p>Once it's all sorted out we should end up with some new and improved breeds of cattle containing a few genetic "lost treasures"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if they do succeed ?
What happens then ? Then they have some previously lost genes and gene-combinations to breed into domestic cattle.Most of the lost genes will probably be things that got bred out because the alternatives make a better domestic animal .
But some of 'em might be useful " better " stuff that just got lost by chance.Once it 's all sorted out we should end up with some new and improved breeds of cattle containing a few genetic " lost treasures "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if they do succeed?
What happens then?Then they have some previously lost genes and gene-combinations to breed into domestic cattle.Most of the lost genes will probably be things that got bred out because the alternatives make a better domestic animal.
But some of 'em might be useful "better" stuff that just got lost by chance.Once it's all sorted out we should end up with some new and improved breeds of cattle containing a few genetic "lost treasures"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30850628</id>
	<title>Re:I knew it!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264066320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did everyone else miss this....</p><p>Three words that, together, should strike fear in to everyone (including Prof Grant):</p><p>Polish Juissaric Park...</p><p>Hoooooollllllyyyyyy  Shit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did everyone else miss this....Three words that , together , should strike fear in to everyone ( including Prof Grant ) : Polish Juissaric Park...Hoooooollllllyyyyyy Shit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did everyone else miss this....Three words that, together, should strike fear in to everyone (including Prof Grant):Polish Juissaric Park...Hoooooollllllyyyyyy  Shit!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845688</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264088640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure, since they have 99\% of the DNA, they're golden! That last 1\% couldn't possibly control something like rampant breeding, accelerated maturation, and a real hankering for the taste of human brains.</p><p>Wait, that sounds like a great movie idea<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... forget I said anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , since they have 99 \ % of the DNA , they 're golden !
That last 1 \ % could n't possibly control something like rampant breeding , accelerated maturation , and a real hankering for the taste of human brains.Wait , that sounds like a great movie idea ... forget I said anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, since they have 99\% of the DNA, they're golden!
That last 1\% couldn't possibly control something like rampant breeding, accelerated maturation, and a real hankering for the taste of human brains.Wait, that sounds like a great movie idea ... forget I said anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30847012</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>DahGhostfacedFiddlah</author>
	<datestamp>1264094520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chicken?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chicken ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chicken?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842442</id>
	<title>Re:Scientist comments on story</title>
	<author>lawpoop</author>
	<datestamp>1264010580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A bit offtopic, I know, but can we please stop referring to everyone and everything as scientists?</p></div><p>Are you saying that anyone who does experimentation with DNA is thereby a scientist? I would disagree. <br> <br>
I don't think anybody *is* referring to everyone and everything as scientists. I think they only do it when the people doing whatever are actually connected to a university, or receive government funding for research. What it means is that the people who are doing this have some social legitimacy in so doing; it's not just a guy in his back yard doing DNA splicing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A bit offtopic , I know , but can we please stop referring to everyone and everything as scientists ? Are you saying that anyone who does experimentation with DNA is thereby a scientist ?
I would disagree .
I do n't think anybody * is * referring to everyone and everything as scientists .
I think they only do it when the people doing whatever are actually connected to a university , or receive government funding for research .
What it means is that the people who are doing this have some social legitimacy in so doing ; it 's not just a guy in his back yard doing DNA splicing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A bit offtopic, I know, but can we please stop referring to everyone and everything as scientists?Are you saying that anyone who does experimentation with DNA is thereby a scientist?
I would disagree.
I don't think anybody *is* referring to everyone and everything as scientists.
I think they only do it when the people doing whatever are actually connected to a university, or receive government funding for research.
What it means is that the people who are doing this have some social legitimacy in so doing; it's not just a guy in his back yard doing DNA splicing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844568</id>
	<title>Quick!</title>
	<author>PinkyDead</author>
	<datestamp>1264080480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Trademark the name McAuroch - you'll make a fortune.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Trademark the name McAuroch - you 'll make a fortune .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trademark the name McAuroch - you'll make a fortune.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845092</id>
	<title>Re:Already Been Done, Seventy Years Ago</title>
	<author>Jeff DeMaagd</author>
	<datestamp>1264085340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Site?</p><p>Anyway, there are people that will believe something despite being presented with facts that show something contrary.  Hitler was known to be pretty irrational.  He didn't like that Jesse Owens showed up his ideologies, and it still didn't stop him from continuing to cling to those ideologies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Site ? Anyway , there are people that will believe something despite being presented with facts that show something contrary .
Hitler was known to be pretty irrational .
He did n't like that Jesse Owens showed up his ideologies , and it still did n't stop him from continuing to cling to those ideologies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Site?Anyway, there are people that will believe something despite being presented with facts that show something contrary.
Hitler was known to be pretty irrational.
He didn't like that Jesse Owens showed up his ideologies, and it still didn't stop him from continuing to cling to those ideologies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844976</id>
	<title>Cow-ard lol</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264084440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What the fuck are 6'6''?</p><p>Seriously, we have to put an end to that non-metric system madness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What the fuck are 6'6' ' ? Seriously , we have to put an end to that non-metric system madness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the fuck are 6'6''?Seriously, we have to put an end to that non-metric system madness.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30852246</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264071180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not just the Midwest.  I know there are a few restaurants in the DC area that serve buffalo meat (Ted's Montana Grill in Crystal City is the best), and I've also seen it in New England.  Good buffalo meat is lean and delicious and plenty tender, but it can be tough and chewy if you don't get the really good stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not just the Midwest .
I know there are a few restaurants in the DC area that serve buffalo meat ( Ted 's Montana Grill in Crystal City is the best ) , and I 've also seen it in New England .
Good buffalo meat is lean and delicious and plenty tender , but it can be tough and chewy if you do n't get the really good stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not just the Midwest.
I know there are a few restaurants in the DC area that serve buffalo meat (Ted's Montana Grill in Crystal City is the best), and I've also seen it in New England.
Good buffalo meat is lean and delicious and plenty tender, but it can be tough and chewy if you don't get the really good stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842370</id>
	<title>Re:What about the dodo?</title>
	<author>funwithBSD</author>
	<datestamp>1264010100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't be stupid... we still have congressmen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't be stupid... we still have congressmen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't be stupid... we still have congressmen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842204</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843668</id>
	<title>It's all great, but...</title>
	<author>ElusiveJoe</author>
	<datestamp>1264068420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where would it live? Between a highway and a power line maybe? There is no living space in modern Europe for wild animals. I doubt it can live in a stall either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where would it live ?
Between a highway and a power line maybe ?
There is no living space in modern Europe for wild animals .
I doubt it can live in a stall either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where would it live?
Between a highway and a power line maybe?
There is no living space in modern Europe for wild animals.
I doubt it can live in a stall either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30859338</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264175460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see a few problems:<br>- first you need to group those genes in just one cell<br>- then you need to succeed in making a viable animal.<br>- actually you'll need to do the above many times before you succeed (previous attempt I heard of on another species, around 400 cells were created, none of them made an animal living more than a day.<br>- then you need to create several of them, a male and a female if you want them to have babies<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>- and if we have 99\% of the auroch genes, what is it going to look like?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Remember, the chimp has about 99\% of the human genes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Bottom line, is I don't think I'll eat auroch meat before I die. And they should focus on saving dying species (plenty to choose from).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see a few problems : - first you need to group those genes in just one cell- then you need to succeed in making a viable animal.- actually you 'll need to do the above many times before you succeed ( previous attempt I heard of on another species , around 400 cells were created , none of them made an animal living more than a day.- then you need to create several of them , a male and a female if you want them to have babies ...- and if we have 99 \ % of the auroch genes , what is it going to look like ?
                  Remember , the chimp has about 99 \ % of the human genes ...Bottom line , is I do n't think I 'll eat auroch meat before I die .
And they should focus on saving dying species ( plenty to choose from ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see a few problems:- first you need to group those genes in just one cell- then you need to succeed in making a viable animal.- actually you'll need to do the above many times before you succeed (previous attempt I heard of on another species, around 400 cells were created, none of them made an animal living more than a day.- then you need to create several of them, a male and a female if you want them to have babies ...- and if we have 99\% of the auroch genes, what is it going to look like?
                  Remember, the chimp has about 99\% of the human genes ...Bottom line, is I don't think I'll eat auroch meat before I die.
And they should focus on saving dying species (plenty to choose from).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30853648</id>
	<title>Re:99\%?</title>
	<author>telomerewhythere</author>
	<datestamp>1264075920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
If I could, I'd mod you informative.  Thanks
</p><p>
diploid for mammals...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I could , I 'd mod you informative .
Thanks diploid for mammals.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
If I could, I'd mod you informative.
Thanks

diploid for mammals...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30848188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264008780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is it that every time something neat in biology comes up, the first thing everyone says is 'What could possibly go wrong' implying, of course, that something exceptionally negative will come about as a result of it?  Jeepers, this thing only died out  four centuries ago.  They're not going to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurassic\_Park\_(franchise)#Jurassic\_Park\_IV" title="wikipedia.org">hunt you down</a> [wikipedia.org] in trained squads.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is it that every time something neat in biology comes up , the first thing everyone says is 'What could possibly go wrong ' implying , of course , that something exceptionally negative will come about as a result of it ?
Jeepers , this thing only died out four centuries ago .
They 're not going to hunt you down [ wikipedia.org ] in trained squads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is it that every time something neat in biology comes up, the first thing everyone says is 'What could possibly go wrong' implying, of course, that something exceptionally negative will come about as a result of it?
Jeepers, this thing only died out  four centuries ago.
They're not going to hunt you down [wikipedia.org] in trained squads.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845056</id>
	<title>Problem?</title>
	<author>TerribleThing</author>
	<datestamp>1264085100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>"researchers in Poland are working on the same problem."
<br> <br>
Problem?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" researchers in Poland are working on the same problem .
" Problem ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"researchers in Poland are working on the same problem.
"
 
Problem?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30852914</id>
	<title>Re:Scientist comments on story</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1264073220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Are you saying that anyone who does experimentation with DNA is thereby a scientist? I would disagree.</p> </div><p>If they are using the scientific method, then you are wrong by definition.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you saying that anyone who does experimentation with DNA is thereby a scientist ?
I would disagree .
If they are using the scientific method , then you are wrong by definition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you saying that anyone who does experimentation with DNA is thereby a scientist?
I would disagree.
If they are using the scientific method, then you are wrong by definition.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30860402</id>
	<title>Maybe some things were meant to be extinct...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264180680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just a thought. Assuming natural selection and all, what happens when an extinct species is reintroduced?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a thought .
Assuming natural selection and all , what happens when an extinct species is reintroduced ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a thought.
Assuming natural selection and all, what happens when an extinct species is reintroduced?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844244</id>
	<title>I think this story</title>
	<author>maroberts</author>
	<datestamp>1264075980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..is a load of bull!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..is a load of bull !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..is a load of bull!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846074</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1264090320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to historical reports, it tasted like chicken...a chicken eaten by a skunk which then died, rotted, and was in turn eaten by a vulture, digested, and shit out onto a pile of dog feces. In other words, it tasted pretty much like a modern McDonalds burger.</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to historical reports , it tasted like chicken...a chicken eaten by a skunk which then died , rotted , and was in turn eaten by a vulture , digested , and shit out onto a pile of dog feces .
In other words , it tasted pretty much like a modern McDonalds burger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to historical reports, it tasted like chicken...a chicken eaten by a skunk which then died, rotted, and was in turn eaten by a vulture, digested, and shit out onto a pile of dog feces.
In other words, it tasted pretty much like a modern McDonalds burger.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843092</id>
	<title>Size</title>
	<author>AliasMarlowe</author>
	<datestamp>1264017300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>TFS says "The auroch weighed 2,200 pounds (1000kg) and its shoulders stood at 6'6". The beasts once roamed most of Asia and northern Africa. The animal was depicted in cave paintings and Julius Caesar described it as being a little less in size than an elephant."
<br> <br>
Some modern horses weigh over a ton (shire horse is up to 1&#189; ton, brabant horse average over 1 ton, clydesdale horses typically about 1 ton), bulls in some breeds of cattle can be up to 1&#189; tons, and the American Bison occasionally exceeds a ton also. These animals would hardly be described as just a little less than an elephant in size, so we're looking at a certain amount of exaggeration or hoopla in TFS and TFA.
<br> <br>
BTW, the record weight for a bull is 1740 kg, so the Auroch hardly merits being referred to as a "giant"</htmltext>
<tokenext>TFS says " The auroch weighed 2,200 pounds ( 1000kg ) and its shoulders stood at 6'6 " .
The beasts once roamed most of Asia and northern Africa .
The animal was depicted in cave paintings and Julius Caesar described it as being a little less in size than an elephant .
" Some modern horses weigh over a ton ( shire horse is up to 1   ton , brabant horse average over 1 ton , clydesdale horses typically about 1 ton ) , bulls in some breeds of cattle can be up to 1   tons , and the American Bison occasionally exceeds a ton also .
These animals would hardly be described as just a little less than an elephant in size , so we 're looking at a certain amount of exaggeration or hoopla in TFS and TFA .
BTW , the record weight for a bull is 1740 kg , so the Auroch hardly merits being referred to as a " giant "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFS says "The auroch weighed 2,200 pounds (1000kg) and its shoulders stood at 6'6".
The beasts once roamed most of Asia and northern Africa.
The animal was depicted in cave paintings and Julius Caesar described it as being a little less in size than an elephant.
"
 
Some modern horses weigh over a ton (shire horse is up to 1½ ton, brabant horse average over 1 ton, clydesdale horses typically about 1 ton), bulls in some breeds of cattle can be up to 1½ tons, and the American Bison occasionally exceeds a ton also.
These animals would hardly be described as just a little less than an elephant in size, so we're looking at a certain amount of exaggeration or hoopla in TFS and TFA.
BTW, the record weight for a bull is 1740 kg, so the Auroch hardly merits being referred to as a "giant"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845396</id>
	<title>We shouldn't be cloning extinct animals!</title>
	<author>MisterZimbu</author>
	<datestamp>1264087140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only disaster could possibly occur when we do such thing.</p><p>Haven't any of you learned anything from the movie, "Jurassic Pauroch?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only disaster could possibly occur when we do such thing.Have n't any of you learned anything from the movie , " Jurassic Pauroch ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only disaster could possibly occur when we do such thing.Haven't any of you learned anything from the movie, "Jurassic Pauroch?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842148</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264008240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wonder what it tastes like?</p><p>[*Gets in line first*]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wonder what it tastes like ?
[ * Gets in line first * ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wonder what it tastes like?
[*Gets in line first*]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844698</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>ericlondaits</author>
	<datestamp>1264081920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm guessing their farts contain a surprising amount of methane and they singlehandedly double the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, bringing forth the apocalypse while unassumingly chewing grass in the fields.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing their farts contain a surprising amount of methane and they singlehandedly double the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere , bringing forth the apocalypse while unassumingly chewing grass in the fields .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing their farts contain a surprising amount of methane and they singlehandedly double the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, bringing forth the apocalypse while unassumingly chewing grass in the fields.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30859500</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>howe.chris</author>
	<datestamp>1264176300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Ancestor-Novel-Scott-Sigler/dp/0307406334/ref=sr\_1\_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1246459434&amp;sr=8-1" title="amazon.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Ancestor-Novel-Scott-Sigler/dp/0307406334/ref=sr\_1\_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1246459434&amp;sr=8-1</a> [amazon.com]

Ancestor:  "...scientists struggle to solve the problem of xenotransplantation -- using animal tissue to replace failing human organs. Funded by the biotech firm Genada, Dr. Claus Rhumkorrf seeks to recreate the ancestor of all mammals. By getting back to the root of our creation, Rhumkorrf hopes to create an animal with human internal organs. Rhumkorrf discovers the ancestor, but it is not the small, harmless creature he envisions. His genius gives birth to a fast-growing evil that nature eradicated 250 million years ago -- an evil now on the loose, and very, very hungry."</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.amazon.com/Ancestor-Novel-Scott-Sigler/dp/0307406334/ref = sr \ _1 \ _1 ? ie = UTF8&amp;s = books&amp;qid = 1246459434&amp;sr = 8-1 [ amazon.com ] Ancestor : " ...scientists struggle to solve the problem of xenotransplantation -- using animal tissue to replace failing human organs .
Funded by the biotech firm Genada , Dr. Claus Rhumkorrf seeks to recreate the ancestor of all mammals .
By getting back to the root of our creation , Rhumkorrf hopes to create an animal with human internal organs .
Rhumkorrf discovers the ancestor , but it is not the small , harmless creature he envisions .
His genius gives birth to a fast-growing evil that nature eradicated 250 million years ago -- an evil now on the loose , and very , very hungry .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.amazon.com/Ancestor-Novel-Scott-Sigler/dp/0307406334/ref=sr\_1\_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1246459434&amp;sr=8-1 [amazon.com]

Ancestor:  "...scientists struggle to solve the problem of xenotransplantation -- using animal tissue to replace failing human organs.
Funded by the biotech firm Genada, Dr. Claus Rhumkorrf seeks to recreate the ancestor of all mammals.
By getting back to the root of our creation, Rhumkorrf hopes to create an animal with human internal organs.
Rhumkorrf discovers the ancestor, but it is not the small, harmless creature he envisions.
His genius gives birth to a fast-growing evil that nature eradicated 250 million years ago -- an evil now on the loose, and very, very hungry.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842356</id>
	<title>Just as long as ...</title>
	<author>unhooked</author>
	<datestamp>1264009980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the damn thing doesn't start talking to me, I hate that shit.<br>It's the reason I'll never go back to Milliways.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the damn thing does n't start talking to me , I hate that shit.It 's the reason I 'll never go back to Milliways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the damn thing doesn't start talking to me, I hate that shit.It's the reason I'll never go back to Milliways.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844000</id>
	<title>oops... too much Harry Potter</title>
	<author>hoover</author>
	<datestamp>1264072980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>anyone else read this as "Auror" at the first glance?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>anyone else read this as " Auror " at the first glance ?
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>anyone else read this as "Auror" at the first glance?
;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842434</id>
	<title>Re:Yum</title>
	<author>camperslo</author>
	<datestamp>1264010580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they're considering the possibility of the Auroch being used for food (I guess it was before if it was hunted so much), it's fair to ask what advantages it might have over modern cattle.<br>Specifically I'm wondering about the carbon footprint per pound of meat, milk etc.</p><p>Can industry be trusted to act responsibly?  I was shocked to learn how far a large cattle operation in California went to alter what was being taught (or wasn't) at a University well know for Agriculture.</p><p><a href="http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/story/983620.html" title="sanluisobispo.com">http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/story/983620.html</a> [sanluisobispo.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they 're considering the possibility of the Auroch being used for food ( I guess it was before if it was hunted so much ) , it 's fair to ask what advantages it might have over modern cattle.Specifically I 'm wondering about the carbon footprint per pound of meat , milk etc.Can industry be trusted to act responsibly ?
I was shocked to learn how far a large cattle operation in California went to alter what was being taught ( or was n't ) at a University well know for Agriculture.http : //www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/story/983620.html [ sanluisobispo.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they're considering the possibility of the Auroch being used for food (I guess it was before if it was hunted so much), it's fair to ask what advantages it might have over modern cattle.Specifically I'm wondering about the carbon footprint per pound of meat, milk etc.Can industry be trusted to act responsibly?
I was shocked to learn how far a large cattle operation in California went to alter what was being taught (or wasn't) at a University well know for Agriculture.http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/story/983620.html [sanluisobispo.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30849034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30848446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30852246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30850628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30852914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30848894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30850062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30853006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30859500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30859748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30859960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30847148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30853646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30859338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30859996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30856316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30860176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30848188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30853648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30850366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30847648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30848870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30850832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30847012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30851946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_0330201_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842718
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30850062
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844646
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843936
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30859960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843606
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842816
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30850628
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30848188
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30853648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30848870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30847148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842398
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842184
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845606
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844244
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30850366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842148
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30847648
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842202
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30860176
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842704
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30847012
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30856316
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846552
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30859338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844940
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30852246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842434
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844552
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843092
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843932
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30859748
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846158
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844616
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30850832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30853006
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842196
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845688
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844698
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844556
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844118
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846544
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30848446
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844850
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843600
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30859996
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844434
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846872
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843264
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846542
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844998
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30846100
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842810
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30859500
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842820
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844968
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842220
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30848894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845396
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843674
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842334
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842370
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30844976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30849034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30851946
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_0330201.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842442
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30852914
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30845976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30853646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30843688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_0330201.30842564
</commentlist>
</conversation>
