<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_20_1241206</id>
	<title>Sound Generator Lethal From 10 Meters</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1263995520000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>penguinrecorder writes <i>"The Thunder Generator uses a mixture of liquefied petroleum, cooking gas, and air to create explosions, which in turn <a href="http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4447499&amp;c=FEA&amp;s=TEC">generate shock waves capable of stunning people</a> from 30 to 100 meters away. At that range, the weapon is relatively harmless, making people run in panic when they feel the sonic blast hitting their bodies. However, at less than ten meters, the Thunder Generator is capable of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5451357/sound-generator-could-kill-humans-at-ten-meters">causing permanent damage or killing people</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>penguinrecorder writes " The Thunder Generator uses a mixture of liquefied petroleum , cooking gas , and air to create explosions , which in turn generate shock waves capable of stunning people from 30 to 100 meters away .
At that range , the weapon is relatively harmless , making people run in panic when they feel the sonic blast hitting their bodies .
However , at less than ten meters , the Thunder Generator is capable of causing permanent damage or killing people .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>penguinrecorder writes "The Thunder Generator uses a mixture of liquefied petroleum, cooking gas, and air to create explosions, which in turn generate shock waves capable of stunning people from 30 to 100 meters away.
At that range, the weapon is relatively harmless, making people run in panic when they feel the sonic blast hitting their bodies.
However, at less than ten meters, the Thunder Generator is capable of causing permanent damage or killing people.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831604</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>DJRumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1264001580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to TFA:</p><p>"Anyone within 30 to 50 meters from the cannon will feel like he's standing in front of a firing squad," he said. "He'll feel and hear the blast, but he won't be hurled to the ground. He'll be able to run away unharmed  and that's the point of this application."</p><p>It seems this will not have much physical force, but will indeed have potential for causing hearing loss.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to TFA : " Anyone within 30 to 50 meters from the cannon will feel like he 's standing in front of a firing squad , " he said .
" He 'll feel and hear the blast , but he wo n't be hurled to the ground .
He 'll be able to run away unharmed and that 's the point of this application .
" It seems this will not have much physical force , but will indeed have potential for causing hearing loss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to TFA:"Anyone within 30 to 50 meters from the cannon will feel like he's standing in front of a firing squad," he said.
"He'll feel and hear the blast, but he won't be hurled to the ground.
He'll be able to run away unharmed  and that's the point of this application.
"It seems this will not have much physical force, but will indeed have potential for causing hearing loss.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831550</id>
	<title>Potential problems on the implementation stage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264001340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When would you typically use this?<br>On a battlefield? No.<br>Against protesters standing neatly behind barriers 30-100 meters away? Well, if they were standing so neatly, there wouldn't be much point in blasting them, would it.<br>Probably against protesters out of control, rushing forward in a chaotic situation. And if the effect is felt strongly you would prefer not to use it when there's lots of policemen trying to control the crowd, and if the effect feels weaker at range, protesters have been pretty well known to ignore some discomfort.<br>I just can't see how the micromechanics of this would work out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When would you typically use this ? On a battlefield ?
No.Against protesters standing neatly behind barriers 30-100 meters away ?
Well , if they were standing so neatly , there would n't be much point in blasting them , would it.Probably against protesters out of control , rushing forward in a chaotic situation .
And if the effect is felt strongly you would prefer not to use it when there 's lots of policemen trying to control the crowd , and if the effect feels weaker at range , protesters have been pretty well known to ignore some discomfort.I just ca n't see how the micromechanics of this would work out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When would you typically use this?On a battlefield?
No.Against protesters standing neatly behind barriers 30-100 meters away?
Well, if they were standing so neatly, there wouldn't be much point in blasting them, would it.Probably against protesters out of control, rushing forward in a chaotic situation.
And if the effect is felt strongly you would prefer not to use it when there's lots of policemen trying to control the crowd, and if the effect feels weaker at range, protesters have been pretty well known to ignore some discomfort.I just can't see how the micromechanics of this would work out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831528</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>mindbrane</author>
	<datestamp>1264001280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I grew up hunting and fishing. I had to pass what was then the bronze, silver and gold small calibre standards. A 20 gauge over and under and a colt 45 remain my favourite weapons although I no longer own guns or hunt. I'm unaware of any permanent damage to hearing caused by handguns, unless you're specifically speaking to indoor ranges. My hearing tests out excellent and I'd hate to see the carnage and spent rounds my years of hunting and target shooting would amount to.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I grew up hunting and fishing .
I had to pass what was then the bronze , silver and gold small calibre standards .
A 20 gauge over and under and a colt 45 remain my favourite weapons although I no longer own guns or hunt .
I 'm unaware of any permanent damage to hearing caused by handguns , unless you 're specifically speaking to indoor ranges .
My hearing tests out excellent and I 'd hate to see the carnage and spent rounds my years of hunting and target shooting would amount to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I grew up hunting and fishing.
I had to pass what was then the bronze, silver and gold small calibre standards.
A 20 gauge over and under and a colt 45 remain my favourite weapons although I no longer own guns or hunt.
I'm unaware of any permanent damage to hearing caused by handguns, unless you're specifically speaking to indoor ranges.
My hearing tests out excellent and I'd hate to see the carnage and spent rounds my years of hunting and target shooting would amount to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831954</id>
	<title>Re:Top news as it happens on Slashdot!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264003140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I won't buy unless they boost that range.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wo n't buy unless they boost that range .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I won't buy unless they boost that range.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836588</id>
	<title>Re:Pacifist</title>
	<author>aaandre</author>
	<datestamp>1263978060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately the ones excited about inventing ways to kill others are also more likely to end up with the most resources.</p><p>What would our budget be like if there was $0 for military spending?</p><p>Infinite greed is not the best advisor, no matter how much the 1\% ultrarich "aristocracy" tries to brainwash it into the 99\% of the population.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately the ones excited about inventing ways to kill others are also more likely to end up with the most resources.What would our budget be like if there was $ 0 for military spending ? Infinite greed is not the best advisor , no matter how much the 1 \ % ultrarich " aristocracy " tries to brainwash it into the 99 \ % of the population .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately the ones excited about inventing ways to kill others are also more likely to end up with the most resources.What would our budget be like if there was $0 for military spending?Infinite greed is not the best advisor, no matter how much the 1\% ultrarich "aristocracy" tries to brainwash it into the 99\% of the population.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833828</id>
	<title>Re:Jon-Erik Hexum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264010100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do they <i>know</i> that they're using blanks?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do they know that they 're using blanks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do they know that they're using blanks?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172</id>
	<title>Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>TerranFury</author>
	<datestamp>1263999540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just firing a handgun without hearing protection is enough to rip out the hair cells in your ears (which don't grow back) and cause permanent hearing loss.  I'm pretty sure that if this thing is capable of "stunning" people it's doing lasting damage to your auditory system.  That damage may be small, but it remains that the ringing you hear in your ears afterward is still a set of frequencies you'll never hear again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just firing a handgun without hearing protection is enough to rip out the hair cells in your ears ( which do n't grow back ) and cause permanent hearing loss .
I 'm pretty sure that if this thing is capable of " stunning " people it 's doing lasting damage to your auditory system .
That damage may be small , but it remains that the ringing you hear in your ears afterward is still a set of frequencies you 'll never hear again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just firing a handgun without hearing protection is enough to rip out the hair cells in your ears (which don't grow back) and cause permanent hearing loss.
I'm pretty sure that if this thing is capable of "stunning" people it's doing lasting damage to your auditory system.
That damage may be small, but it remains that the ringing you hear in your ears afterward is still a set of frequencies you'll never hear again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831118</id>
	<title>The A-Team</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263999240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the words of B. A. Baracus, "<b>BOOM!</b>"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the words of B. A. Baracus , " BOOM !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the words of B. A. Baracus, "BOOM!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832348</id>
	<title>Now, that's what I call...</title>
	<author>jeffshoaf</author>
	<datestamp>1264005000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>a <strong>BOOMbox!</strong></htmltext>
<tokenext>a BOOMbox !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a BOOMbox!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836072</id>
	<title>Re:Potato Cannons</title>
	<author>NotBornYesterday</author>
	<datestamp>1264018920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thanks for speaking up on this issue.  Some people will always demonize legitimate potato ownership, and seek to take away our right to bear starchy food.  It's good to know that others around here don't buy their anti-freedom propaganda.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for speaking up on this issue .
Some people will always demonize legitimate potato ownership , and seek to take away our right to bear starchy food .
It 's good to know that others around here do n't buy their anti-freedom propaganda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for speaking up on this issue.
Some people will always demonize legitimate potato ownership, and seek to take away our right to bear starchy food.
It's good to know that others around here don't buy their anti-freedom propaganda.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831186</id>
	<title>When 11 Just Isn't Loud Enough...</title>
	<author>jaminJay</author>
	<datestamp>1263999540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
When 11 just isn't loud enough...
</p><p>
Finally, <em>Disaster Area</em> can live up to their reputation!
</p><p>
Etc...
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When 11 just is n't loud enough.. . Finally , Disaster Area can live up to their reputation !
Etc.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
When 11 just isn't loud enough...

Finally, Disaster Area can live up to their reputation!
Etc...
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831340</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264000500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Article doesn't give too many details, but if it's a vortex cannon it could be capable stunning people without causing hearing loss. The question is whether you get stunned by a wall of air or very loud sound.  I don't trust reporters to be able to distinguish the two.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Article does n't give too many details , but if it 's a vortex cannon it could be capable stunning people without causing hearing loss .
The question is whether you get stunned by a wall of air or very loud sound .
I do n't trust reporters to be able to distinguish the two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Article doesn't give too many details, but if it's a vortex cannon it could be capable stunning people without causing hearing loss.
The question is whether you get stunned by a wall of air or very loud sound.
I don't trust reporters to be able to distinguish the two.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30841994</id>
	<title>This is hardly a new idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264006620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a book titled "German Secret Weapons" and it mentions the Nazi's experimenting with a very similar device (with very similar reported effects) detonating a methane/air mixture back in the late '30s. Although the (fuzzy) picture shows a rather large awkward-looking fixed-emplacement weapon while the one described in TFA sounds like it might be man-portable. It was designed for airfield defense and the project was dropped because they could not extend the range much over 300 yards, which was way too short to reach Norden bombsight equipped B-17's.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a book titled " German Secret Weapons " and it mentions the Nazi 's experimenting with a very similar device ( with very similar reported effects ) detonating a methane/air mixture back in the late '30s .
Although the ( fuzzy ) picture shows a rather large awkward-looking fixed-emplacement weapon while the one described in TFA sounds like it might be man-portable .
It was designed for airfield defense and the project was dropped because they could not extend the range much over 300 yards , which was way too short to reach Norden bombsight equipped B-17 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a book titled "German Secret Weapons" and it mentions the Nazi's experimenting with a very similar device (with very similar reported effects) detonating a methane/air mixture back in the late '30s.
Although the (fuzzy) picture shows a rather large awkward-looking fixed-emplacement weapon while the one described in TFA sounds like it might be man-portable.
It was designed for airfield defense and the project was dropped because they could not extend the range much over 300 yards, which was way too short to reach Norden bombsight equipped B-17's.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832054</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>Trailer Trash</author>
	<datestamp>1264003620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem is that it's being pushed as "non-lethal", yet it clearly can be lethal.  Like tasers.  Around 350 people have died in the US in the last 10 years from supposedly non-lethal tasers.</p><p>The other issue is that if it's not lethal and causes no permanent damage, it's a new tool for torture.  Again, like tasers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is that it 's being pushed as " non-lethal " , yet it clearly can be lethal .
Like tasers .
Around 350 people have died in the US in the last 10 years from supposedly non-lethal tasers.The other issue is that if it 's not lethal and causes no permanent damage , it 's a new tool for torture .
Again , like tasers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is that it's being pushed as "non-lethal", yet it clearly can be lethal.
Like tasers.
Around 350 people have died in the US in the last 10 years from supposedly non-lethal tasers.The other issue is that if it's not lethal and causes no permanent damage, it's a new tool for torture.
Again, like tasers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836820</id>
	<title>Re:Pacifist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263978960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTA: Israeli farmers used the first version to scare birds from crop fields.</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : Israeli farmers used the first version to scare birds from crop fields .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA: Israeli farmers used the first version to scare birds from crop fields.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835276</id>
	<title>Re:Pacifist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264015920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better yet, just kill the people undeserving all the resources we would otherwise waste on their undeserving and pathetic existences, and stockpile the left overs.</p><p>Life is cheap and always has been cheap. The fact that you and I aren't dead yet is only because we haven't sufficiently hampered someones path to power/fame/wealth/whatever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better yet , just kill the people undeserving all the resources we would otherwise waste on their undeserving and pathetic existences , and stockpile the left overs.Life is cheap and always has been cheap .
The fact that you and I are n't dead yet is only because we have n't sufficiently hampered someones path to power/fame/wealth/whatever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better yet, just kill the people undeserving all the resources we would otherwise waste on their undeserving and pathetic existences, and stockpile the left overs.Life is cheap and always has been cheap.
The fact that you and I aren't dead yet is only because we haven't sufficiently hampered someones path to power/fame/wealth/whatever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831822</id>
	<title>Sound Generator?</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1264002600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A bomb is a sound generator too, and maybe we should this thing for what it is, a bomb.  It is very loud when it explodes, and is world renowned for its ability to stun people at safe distances and kill them at closer distances.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A bomb is a sound generator too , and maybe we should this thing for what it is , a bomb .
It is very loud when it explodes , and is world renowned for its ability to stun people at safe distances and kill them at closer distances .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A bomb is a sound generator too, and maybe we should this thing for what it is, a bomb.
It is very loud when it explodes, and is world renowned for its ability to stun people at safe distances and kill them at closer distances.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831836</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264002660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; In other news, a concussion can be dangerous.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Ya, it's not news.  It sounds like a potato cannon without the potato, firing at 100 pulses per minute.  Pretty interesting that they're getting that kind of rate, but still, obviously dangerous.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; There's a reason a concussion grenade works, and it's not always shrapnel.  I'm guessing the 10m deadly zone is directly downrange of the cannon, not beside or behind it.  It's still a contained explosion, so all the force goes one direction, rather than disbursing in all directions.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Rapid sequence concussions can effect the action of the heart (induced arrhythmia), or a variety of other problems similar to being hit by something.  So it's a concussion, not a projectile.  Still obviously deadly. Folks know, don't shoot at people unless you want them dead, and that includes firing blanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    In other news , a concussion can be dangerous .
    Ya , it 's not news .
It sounds like a potato cannon without the potato , firing at 100 pulses per minute .
Pretty interesting that they 're getting that kind of rate , but still , obviously dangerous .
    There 's a reason a concussion grenade works , and it 's not always shrapnel .
I 'm guessing the 10m deadly zone is directly downrange of the cannon , not beside or behind it .
It 's still a contained explosion , so all the force goes one direction , rather than disbursing in all directions .
    Rapid sequence concussions can effect the action of the heart ( induced arrhythmia ) , or a variety of other problems similar to being hit by something .
So it 's a concussion , not a projectile .
Still obviously deadly .
Folks know , do n't shoot at people unless you want them dead , and that includes firing blanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    In other news, a concussion can be dangerous.
    Ya, it's not news.
It sounds like a potato cannon without the potato, firing at 100 pulses per minute.
Pretty interesting that they're getting that kind of rate, but still, obviously dangerous.
    There's a reason a concussion grenade works, and it's not always shrapnel.
I'm guessing the 10m deadly zone is directly downrange of the cannon, not beside or behind it.
It's still a contained explosion, so all the force goes one direction, rather than disbursing in all directions.
    Rapid sequence concussions can effect the action of the heart (induced arrhythmia), or a variety of other problems similar to being hit by something.
So it's a concussion, not a projectile.
Still obviously deadly.
Folks know, don't shoot at people unless you want them dead, and that includes firing blanks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836620</id>
	<title>Excellent!</title>
	<author>aaandre</author>
	<datestamp>1263978180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally, a *humane* weapon that also kills... If the crowd chooses to come closer or not move away from the advancing vehicle where the weapon is mounted, that's their choice!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , a * humane * weapon that also kills... If the crowd chooses to come closer or not move away from the advancing vehicle where the weapon is mounted , that 's their choice !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, a *humane* weapon that also kills... If the crowd chooses to come closer or not move away from the advancing vehicle where the weapon is mounted, that's their choice!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831782</id>
	<title>Kate Bush did it!</title>
	<author>RevWaldo</author>
	<datestamp>1264002420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Experiment IV" <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6hvNe11r9U" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6hvNe11r9U</a> [youtube.com] <br> <br>
Warning - pretentious as hell, even for Kate Bush fans. YMMV. Starring Hugh "the guy from House" Laurie and Dawn "magnificent bosom" French.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Experiment IV " http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = a6hvNe11r9U [ youtube.com ] Warning - pretentious as hell , even for Kate Bush fans .
YMMV. Starring Hugh " the guy from House " Laurie and Dawn " magnificent bosom " French .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Experiment IV" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6hvNe11r9U [youtube.com]  
Warning - pretentious as hell, even for Kate Bush fans.
YMMV. Starring Hugh "the guy from House" Laurie and Dawn "magnificent bosom" French.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833724</id>
	<title>Re:Pacifist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264009680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We're not developing newer ways to kill ourselves; we're developing newer ways to take out someone else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're not developing newer ways to kill ourselves ; we 're developing newer ways to take out someone else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're not developing newer ways to kill ourselves; we're developing newer ways to take out someone else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831448</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264000920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, it's just marketing. Why it's produced verbatim on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. is another matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , it 's just marketing .
Why it 's produced verbatim on / .
is another matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, it's just marketing.
Why it's produced verbatim on /.
is another matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834932</id>
	<title>Re:First Dune Post</title>
	<author>Cormacus</author>
	<datestamp>1264014720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yell at it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yell at it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yell at it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832198</id>
	<title>Re:TFA SAID, "RELATIVELY HARMLESS"!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264004340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, in military terms that means that if someone happens to find himself in front of one of those toys then that person will find himself, when compared with some other bloke, well... without his arms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , in military terms that means that if someone happens to find himself in front of one of those toys then that person will find himself , when compared with some other bloke , well... without his arms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, in military terms that means that if someone happens to find himself in front of one of those toys then that person will find himself, when compared with some other bloke, well... without his arms.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831586</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834500</id>
	<title>Re:Pacifist</title>
	<author>radtea</author>
	<datestamp>1264012620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>i'd like for any place we occupy to have as few civilian deaths as possible, so i think working on systems like this is a good thing.</i></p><p>One possible means of reducing civilian deaths is to occupy fewer places.  It's quite a bit cheaper, too, and fewer Americans get killed in the process as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i 'd like for any place we occupy to have as few civilian deaths as possible , so i think working on systems like this is a good thing.One possible means of reducing civilian deaths is to occupy fewer places .
It 's quite a bit cheaper , too , and fewer Americans get killed in the process as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i'd like for any place we occupy to have as few civilian deaths as possible, so i think working on systems like this is a good thing.One possible means of reducing civilian deaths is to occupy fewer places.
It's quite a bit cheaper, too, and fewer Americans get killed in the process as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831502</id>
	<title>First Dune Post</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1264001160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Through sound and motion, you will be able to paralyze nerves, shatter bones, set fires, suffocate an enemy or burst his organs."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Through sound and motion , you will be able to paralyze nerves , shatter bones , set fires , suffocate an enemy or burst his organs .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Through sound and motion, you will be able to paralyze nerves, shatter bones, set fires, suffocate an enemy or burst his organs.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833378</id>
	<title>Re:TFA SAID, "RELATIVELY HARMLESS"!!!</title>
	<author>pha3r0</author>
	<datestamp>1264008480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In military parlance, "relatively harmless" means something different than what it does in the civilian world.</p></div><p>Reminds me of my favourite quotes, from Colonel David Perkins after the US's 'thunder run' into Baghdad: "We have destroyed all of his prepared organic defences, along with his equipment...we destroyed probably in excess of 1000 dismounted infantry"</p><p>So yeah 'relatively harmless' in military terms means pretty much it's not \_for\_sure\_ going to kill you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In military parlance , " relatively harmless " means something different than what it does in the civilian world.Reminds me of my favourite quotes , from Colonel David Perkins after the US 's 'thunder run ' into Baghdad : " We have destroyed all of his prepared organic defences , along with his equipment...we destroyed probably in excess of 1000 dismounted infantry " So yeah 'relatively harmless ' in military terms means pretty much it 's not \ _for \ _sure \ _ going to kill you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In military parlance, "relatively harmless" means something different than what it does in the civilian world.Reminds me of my favourite quotes, from Colonel David Perkins after the US's 'thunder run' into Baghdad: "We have destroyed all of his prepared organic defences, along with his equipment...we destroyed probably in excess of 1000 dismounted infantry"So yeah 'relatively harmless' in military terms means pretty much it's not \_for\_sure\_ going to kill you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831586</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831228</id>
	<title>Top news as it happens on Slashdot!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263999780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sufficiently powerful shock waves can kill people!</p><p>Coming up next we ask an expert - what exactly is an explosion again?</p><p>Weather follows at 11.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sufficiently powerful shock waves can kill people ! Coming up next we ask an expert - what exactly is an explosion again ? Weather follows at 11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sufficiently powerful shock waves can kill people!Coming up next we ask an expert - what exactly is an explosion again?Weather follows at 11.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832490</id>
	<title>Here come the force push jokes ...</title>
	<author>justinlee37</author>
	<datestamp>1264005540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>5<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. 4<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. 3<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. 2 . 1 .</htmltext>
<tokenext>5 .. 4 .. 3 .. 2 .
1 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>5 .. 4 .. 3 .. 2 .
1 .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831722</id>
	<title>TubgiRl</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264002120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">It transforms into That *BSD 0wned. ttosers, went out</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>It transforms into That * BSD 0wned .
ttosers , went out [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It transforms into That *BSD 0wned.
ttosers, went out [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30839598</id>
	<title>Spud gun</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263989940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, basically what they've made is a automatic spud gun.<br>Maybe they've been having troubles with the loader getting the potatoes into the barrel fast enough &amp; someone in marketing had the idea that they could sell it to a different crowd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , basically what they 've made is a automatic spud gun.Maybe they 've been having troubles with the loader getting the potatoes into the barrel fast enough &amp; someone in marketing had the idea that they could sell it to a different crowd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, basically what they've made is a automatic spud gun.Maybe they've been having troubles with the loader getting the potatoes into the barrel fast enough &amp; someone in marketing had the idea that they could sell it to a different crowd.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>j00r0m4nc3r</author>
	<datestamp>1264000080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't see the big news here. At close range it's easy to kill. Even something like a $5 potato cannon can kill people at close range. Being in close proximity to exploding things has never really been good for your health..</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see the big news here .
At close range it 's easy to kill .
Even something like a $ 5 potato cannon can kill people at close range .
Being in close proximity to exploding things has never really been good for your health. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see the big news here.
At close range it's easy to kill.
Even something like a $5 potato cannon can kill people at close range.
Being in close proximity to exploding things has never really been good for your health..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832480</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>VorpalRodent</author>
	<datestamp>1264005540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is offtopic, but it depends upon what end of the potato cannon one is on.  As a younger man, I had built a number of these.  One summer on vacation, my uncle, who does HVAC, decided that we should build one to shoot out over a lake.
<p>
Other than the PVC for the barrel and chamber, he chose the fittings he was familiar with: expandable rubberized ones (turn the screw, it expands to seal the gap).  If you are familiar with these fittings, you understand that they are not exactly designed for internal combustion.
</p><p>
Well, upon ignition, the end cap flew off and struck me squarely in the groin.  To bring this back around to your statement - it did not kill me, nor did it render me incapable of reproducing.  It did, however, provide much entertainment to everyone else, as there was enough force to put me on the ground for a while.
</p><p>
I sure wish we had taped that...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is offtopic , but it depends upon what end of the potato cannon one is on .
As a younger man , I had built a number of these .
One summer on vacation , my uncle , who does HVAC , decided that we should build one to shoot out over a lake .
Other than the PVC for the barrel and chamber , he chose the fittings he was familiar with : expandable rubberized ones ( turn the screw , it expands to seal the gap ) .
If you are familiar with these fittings , you understand that they are not exactly designed for internal combustion .
Well , upon ignition , the end cap flew off and struck me squarely in the groin .
To bring this back around to your statement - it did not kill me , nor did it render me incapable of reproducing .
It did , however , provide much entertainment to everyone else , as there was enough force to put me on the ground for a while .
I sure wish we had taped that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is offtopic, but it depends upon what end of the potato cannon one is on.
As a younger man, I had built a number of these.
One summer on vacation, my uncle, who does HVAC, decided that we should build one to shoot out over a lake.
Other than the PVC for the barrel and chamber, he chose the fittings he was familiar with: expandable rubberized ones (turn the screw, it expands to seal the gap).
If you are familiar with these fittings, you understand that they are not exactly designed for internal combustion.
Well, upon ignition, the end cap flew off and struck me squarely in the groin.
To bring this back around to your statement - it did not kill me, nor did it render me incapable of reproducing.
It did, however, provide much entertainment to everyone else, as there was enough force to put me on the ground for a while.
I sure wish we had taped that...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835886</id>
	<title>Re:Know what else is lethal at 10 meters?</title>
	<author>IndigoDarkwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1264018140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't forget <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/u\_s\_condemned\_for\_pre\_emptive\_use" title="theonion.com" rel="nofollow">Hillary Clinton</a> [theonion.com].<br>
<br>
--<br>
I for one welcome our megacorporate overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget Hillary Clinton [ theonion.com ] .
-- I for one welcome our megacorporate overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget Hillary Clinton [theonion.com].
--
I for one welcome our megacorporate overlords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832952</id>
	<title>Re:Pacifist</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1264007160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would like to see your dream made a reality. The reason we build killing machines is so that we can protect ourselves from other peoples' killing machines. If you were to merely conquer the world and make yourself emperor, there would be nobody "else" to defend ourselves against.</p><p>So get right on that. Make your vision of peace a reality. You might want to start by building some killing machines.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would like to see your dream made a reality .
The reason we build killing machines is so that we can protect ourselves from other peoples ' killing machines .
If you were to merely conquer the world and make yourself emperor , there would be nobody " else " to defend ourselves against.So get right on that .
Make your vision of peace a reality .
You might want to start by building some killing machines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would like to see your dream made a reality.
The reason we build killing machines is so that we can protect ourselves from other peoples' killing machines.
If you were to merely conquer the world and make yourself emperor, there would be nobody "else" to defend ourselves against.So get right on that.
Make your vision of peace a reality.
You might want to start by building some killing machines.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832260</id>
	<title>Re:How fast?</title>
	<author>TheTurtlesMoves</author>
	<datestamp>1264004640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thats what a shock wave is. It moves faster than  the local speed of sound of the medium its moving into. Behind the shock wave, the hotter, higher pressure gases has a much higher local speed of sound and the flow is "subsonic".*
<br> <br>
* this is for all normal shocks, such as those from explosions. Oblique shock waves have different properties.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats what a shock wave is .
It moves faster than the local speed of sound of the medium its moving into .
Behind the shock wave , the hotter , higher pressure gases has a much higher local speed of sound and the flow is " subsonic " .
* * this is for all normal shocks , such as those from explosions .
Oblique shock waves have different properties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats what a shock wave is.
It moves faster than  the local speed of sound of the medium its moving into.
Behind the shock wave, the hotter, higher pressure gases has a much higher local speed of sound and the flow is "subsonic".
*
 
* this is for all normal shocks, such as those from explosions.
Oblique shock waves have different properties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30854898</id>
	<title>So much abuse potential!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264082280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can already see peaceful, legal demonstrators near the capitol building protesting nicely, peacefully, and then being bombarded with these things from 30 meters away. This is where I'd hope that the demonstrators would have a few of these things themselves so they could turn them back on the police once the police started using them against the demonstrators. I think that would be very appropriate!

And what about torture? I can see our nice, honest, citizen loving government using these things for just such purposes; against people who do everything within their legal rights.

What's happening to our country? Why has our government become so damn corrupt?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can already see peaceful , legal demonstrators near the capitol building protesting nicely , peacefully , and then being bombarded with these things from 30 meters away .
This is where I 'd hope that the demonstrators would have a few of these things themselves so they could turn them back on the police once the police started using them against the demonstrators .
I think that would be very appropriate !
And what about torture ?
I can see our nice , honest , citizen loving government using these things for just such purposes ; against people who do everything within their legal rights .
What 's happening to our country ?
Why has our government become so damn corrupt ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can already see peaceful, legal demonstrators near the capitol building protesting nicely, peacefully, and then being bombarded with these things from 30 meters away.
This is where I'd hope that the demonstrators would have a few of these things themselves so they could turn them back on the police once the police started using them against the demonstrators.
I think that would be very appropriate!
And what about torture?
I can see our nice, honest, citizen loving government using these things for just such purposes; against people who do everything within their legal rights.
What's happening to our country?
Why has our government become so damn corrupt?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833746</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>fprintf</author>
	<datestamp>1264009800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Same circumstances, different results here. I grew up hunting and fishing, often shooting a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.22LR rifle or 12guage shotgun in the afternoon after classes were finished (gotta love going to college in upstate NY) without any hearing protection. I have noticeable hearing loss in my right ear, and measurable hearing loss in my left ear. It wasn't enough hearing loss at the time to keep me out of the service, but as I have gotten older it has perhaps compounded with age-related hearing loss to make it noticeable.</p><p>I do shoot now, but I always double up on my hearing protection. Foam ear canal inserts combined with over the ear muffs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Same circumstances , different results here .
I grew up hunting and fishing , often shooting a .22LR rifle or 12guage shotgun in the afternoon after classes were finished ( got ta love going to college in upstate NY ) without any hearing protection .
I have noticeable hearing loss in my right ear , and measurable hearing loss in my left ear .
It was n't enough hearing loss at the time to keep me out of the service , but as I have gotten older it has perhaps compounded with age-related hearing loss to make it noticeable.I do shoot now , but I always double up on my hearing protection .
Foam ear canal inserts combined with over the ear muffs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same circumstances, different results here.
I grew up hunting and fishing, often shooting a .22LR rifle or 12guage shotgun in the afternoon after classes were finished (gotta love going to college in upstate NY) without any hearing protection.
I have noticeable hearing loss in my right ear, and measurable hearing loss in my left ear.
It wasn't enough hearing loss at the time to keep me out of the service, but as I have gotten older it has perhaps compounded with age-related hearing loss to make it noticeable.I do shoot now, but I always double up on my hearing protection.
Foam ear canal inserts combined with over the ear muffs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834918</id>
	<title>Re:How fast?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264014600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>RTFA again, and this time, don't jump to conclusions until you can *understand* what you read.

<p>They're not making a "burst of sound" move at 6 times the speed of sound. They're creating a shock wave that moves that fast. TFA clearly states: "...by the extreme air pressure and sonic boom effect generated...". A sonic boom is caused when something (the shock wave here) has supersonic velocity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RTFA again , and this time , do n't jump to conclusions until you can * understand * what you read .
They 're not making a " burst of sound " move at 6 times the speed of sound .
They 're creating a shock wave that moves that fast .
TFA clearly states : " ...by the extreme air pressure and sonic boom effect generated... " .
A sonic boom is caused when something ( the shock wave here ) has supersonic velocity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RTFA again, and this time, don't jump to conclusions until you can *understand* what you read.
They're not making a "burst of sound" move at 6 times the speed of sound.
They're creating a shock wave that moves that fast.
TFA clearly states: "...by the extreme air pressure and sonic boom effect generated...".
A sonic boom is caused when something (the shock wave here) has supersonic velocity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832042</id>
	<title>Re:Potato Cannons</title>
	<author>operagost</author>
	<datestamp>1264003560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <tt>potatoe</tt></p></div> </blockquote><p>Dan Quayle, is that you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>potatoe Dan Quayle , is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> potatoe Dan Quayle, is that you?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832214</id>
	<title>Even more lethal...</title>
	<author>jimshatt</author>
	<datestamp>1264004400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Monty Python invented something even deadlier: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gpjk\_MaCGM" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gpjk\_MaCGM</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Monty Python invented something even deadlier : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 8gpjk \ _MaCGM [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Monty Python invented something even deadlier: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gpjk\_MaCGM [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835254</id>
	<title>Re:Potato Cannons</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1264015860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Potatoes are a gateway to violence. Millions of children are taught to drive pointy objects into Mr.Potatohead. Then they grow up to be punks and drive nails into each other's scalps.</p><p>Clearly potatoes are a menace to society, and should be banned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Potatoes are a gateway to violence .
Millions of children are taught to drive pointy objects into Mr.Potatohead .
Then they grow up to be punks and drive nails into each other 's scalps.Clearly potatoes are a menace to society , and should be banned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Potatoes are a gateway to violence.
Millions of children are taught to drive pointy objects into Mr.Potatohead.
Then they grow up to be punks and drive nails into each other's scalps.Clearly potatoes are a menace to society, and should be banned.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836430</id>
	<title>Re:IAF Sound Devices</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264020480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There is also an high frequency version that is audible, that also produces a burning sensation on the skin (but does not produce any permanent damage).</p></div><p>You're confusing two different weapons there.  There are audible less-lethal systems like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long\_range\_acoustic\_device" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">LRAD</a> [wikipedia.org] that basically make a very loud sound.  The frequency is kind of high because high frequency sounds are easier to direct and focus.   Then there is that millimeter weapon, ADS that causes a heat sensation on the skin.  It uses radio waves, not sound, and it's not audible.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is also an high frequency version that is audible , that also produces a burning sensation on the skin ( but does not produce any permanent damage ) .You 're confusing two different weapons there .
There are audible less-lethal systems like LRAD [ wikipedia.org ] that basically make a very loud sound .
The frequency is kind of high because high frequency sounds are easier to direct and focus .
Then there is that millimeter weapon , ADS that causes a heat sensation on the skin .
It uses radio waves , not sound , and it 's not audible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is also an high frequency version that is audible, that also produces a burning sensation on the skin (but does not produce any permanent damage).You're confusing two different weapons there.
There are audible less-lethal systems like LRAD [wikipedia.org] that basically make a very loud sound.
The frequency is kind of high because high frequency sounds are easier to direct and focus.
Then there is that millimeter weapon, ADS that causes a heat sensation on the skin.
It uses radio waves, not sound, and it's not audible.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836920</id>
	<title>Re:Pacifist</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1263979380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe I'm being a bit too much of a pacifist here, but why are we constantly spending so much time developing newer ways to kill ourselves.. seems like we could better use those resources.</p></div><p>
Because we absolutely love the phrase, "Watch this!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I 'm being a bit too much of a pacifist here , but why are we constantly spending so much time developing newer ways to kill ourselves.. seems like we could better use those resources .
Because we absolutely love the phrase , " Watch this !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I'm being a bit too much of a pacifist here, but why are we constantly spending so much time developing newer ways to kill ourselves.. seems like we could better use those resources.
Because we absolutely love the phrase, "Watch this!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831348</id>
	<title>TFA SAID, "RELATIVELY HARMLESS"!!!</title>
	<author>jeffb (2.718)</author>
	<datestamp>1264000500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&lt;/Garrett\_Morris&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext></tokentext>
<sentencetext></sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832018</id>
	<title>Voice power</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264003440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Beck and Limbaugh are lethal (to brain cells) from a mere 2 feet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Beck and Limbaugh are lethal ( to brain cells ) from a mere 2 feet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Beck and Limbaugh are lethal (to brain cells) from a mere 2 feet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832678</id>
	<title>2000 meters per second?</title>
	<author>mrjb</author>
	<datestamp>1264006200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTA:<blockquote><div><p>According to company data, the system generates 60 to 100 bursts per minute, each traveling at about 2,000 meters per second and lasting up to 300 milliseconds</p></div></blockquote><p>
So they have sound travelling at almost 6 times the speed of sound? That's some *serious* abuse of recursive technology there. No doubt, it works by making people's brains hurt.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : According to company data , the system generates 60 to 100 bursts per minute , each traveling at about 2,000 meters per second and lasting up to 300 milliseconds So they have sound travelling at almost 6 times the speed of sound ?
That 's some * serious * abuse of recursive technology there .
No doubt , it works by making people 's brains hurt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA:According to company data, the system generates 60 to 100 bursts per minute, each traveling at about 2,000 meters per second and lasting up to 300 milliseconds
So they have sound travelling at almost 6 times the speed of sound?
That's some *serious* abuse of recursive technology there.
No doubt, it works by making people's brains hurt.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30838574</id>
	<title>Humans are such awful creatures</title>
	<author>okmijnuhb</author>
	<datestamp>1263985620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Humans are such awful creatures, we must use all available technologies to stun, maim, and kill these vile beings.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Humans are such awful creatures , we must use all available technologies to stun , maim , and kill these vile beings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Humans are such awful creatures, we must use all available technologies to stun, maim, and kill these vile beings.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835302</id>
	<title>Re:Potato Cannons</title>
	<author>gyrogeerloose</author>
	<datestamp>1264015980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the aforementioned Peruvian Murder Spud (rough translation) that the CIA used in an assasination attempt on the husband of Evita Peron.</p></div><p>No, you've gotten it all wrong. There's no such thing as the Peruvian Murder Spud. The CIA used the <i>Argentinian</i></p><p> Murder Spud on Juan Peron. He was an Argentinian, after all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the aforementioned Peruvian Murder Spud ( rough translation ) that the CIA used in an assasination attempt on the husband of Evita Peron.No , you 've gotten it all wrong .
There 's no such thing as the Peruvian Murder Spud .
The CIA used the Argentinian Murder Spud on Juan Peron .
He was an Argentinian , after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the aforementioned Peruvian Murder Spud (rough translation) that the CIA used in an assasination attempt on the husband of Evita Peron.No, you've gotten it all wrong.
There's no such thing as the Peruvian Murder Spud.
The CIA used the Argentinian Murder Spud on Juan Peron.
He was an Argentinian, after all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835992</id>
	<title>fuel vapor..... sound like a mini moab</title>
	<author>argontechnologies</author>
	<datestamp>1264018560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any tool can be misused.  If you know the 'safe' limits of the non-lethal technology you are using in a non-combat environment, you should be able to use it safely.  It would be this is still much safer than rubber bullets (or lead for that matter).  In a combat environment it matters not.  Kill em all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any tool can be misused .
If you know the 'safe ' limits of the non-lethal technology you are using in a non-combat environment , you should be able to use it safely .
It would be this is still much safer than rubber bullets ( or lead for that matter ) .
In a combat environment it matters not .
Kill em all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any tool can be misused.
If you know the 'safe' limits of the non-lethal technology you are using in a non-combat environment, you should be able to use it safely.
It would be this is still much safer than rubber bullets (or lead for that matter).
In a combat environment it matters not.
Kill em all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831472</id>
	<title>Mixture of what?</title>
	<author>bcmm</author>
	<datestamp>1264000980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>LPG and cooking gas are both usually ways of saying propane/butane mix. Any ideas as to what they're trying to say here?</htmltext>
<tokenext>LPG and cooking gas are both usually ways of saying propane/butane mix .
Any ideas as to what they 're trying to say here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LPG and cooking gas are both usually ways of saying propane/butane mix.
Any ideas as to what they're trying to say here?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833376</id>
	<title>Re:Wait...what?</title>
	<author>Duradin</author>
	<datestamp>1264008480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If only we could figure out a way to direct the energy of this weapon...</p><p>It's not like they call it a cannon 'stun gun' which would it has a barrel or other apparatus that would direct the energy away from the person firing it.</p><p>"In addition to the basic single-barrel, cart-mounted design, ArmyTec is offering Thunder Generator in fixed or vehicle-mounted installations, operated manually or via remote control. The firm's proposed multibarrel design simulates a battlefield-like experience, while a three-axis moving barrel allows precise targeting of areas within a wide perimeter. For very-wide-area coverage, the firm recommends synchronized networks of multiple cannons." -from the fine article.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If only we could figure out a way to direct the energy of this weapon...It 's not like they call it a cannon 'stun gun ' which would it has a barrel or other apparatus that would direct the energy away from the person firing it .
" In addition to the basic single-barrel , cart-mounted design , ArmyTec is offering Thunder Generator in fixed or vehicle-mounted installations , operated manually or via remote control .
The firm 's proposed multibarrel design simulates a battlefield-like experience , while a three-axis moving barrel allows precise targeting of areas within a wide perimeter .
For very-wide-area coverage , the firm recommends synchronized networks of multiple cannons .
" -from the fine article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If only we could figure out a way to direct the energy of this weapon...It's not like they call it a cannon 'stun gun' which would it has a barrel or other apparatus that would direct the energy away from the person firing it.
"In addition to the basic single-barrel, cart-mounted design, ArmyTec is offering Thunder Generator in fixed or vehicle-mounted installations, operated manually or via remote control.
The firm's proposed multibarrel design simulates a battlefield-like experience, while a three-axis moving barrel allows precise targeting of areas within a wide perimeter.
For very-wide-area coverage, the firm recommends synchronized networks of multiple cannons.
" -from the fine article.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833692</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264009560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given the population of the US is around 330M or so, you want me to get upset about a generally safe tool that has a track record of killing 0.0000001\% of the population a year and accounting for a whole 0.00001\% of deaths a year? The lethality rate for them is 1.5 or so per 100k uses and is, for the most part, easily attributed to pre-existing health conditions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the population of the US is around 330M or so , you want me to get upset about a generally safe tool that has a track record of killing 0.0000001 \ % of the population a year and accounting for a whole 0.00001 \ % of deaths a year ?
The lethality rate for them is 1.5 or so per 100k uses and is , for the most part , easily attributed to pre-existing health conditions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the population of the US is around 330M or so, you want me to get upset about a generally safe tool that has a track record of killing 0.0000001\% of the population a year and accounting for a whole 0.00001\% of deaths a year?
The lethality rate for them is 1.5 or so per 100k uses and is, for the most part, easily attributed to pre-existing health conditions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835360</id>
	<title>Re:The A-Team</title>
	<author>kurzweilfreak</author>
	<datestamp>1264016160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In the words of Halo 3 players all over, <b>"BOOM HEADSHOT!"</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the words of Halo 3 players all over , " BOOM HEADSHOT !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the words of Halo 3 players all over, "BOOM HEADSHOT!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836186</id>
	<title>Re:Pacifist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264019460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not big on violence myself, but reality can be a bit intrusive.</p><p>If you don't want weapons, don't see any need even for defensive weapons, you might want to avoid boating near Somalia or some noted places in southeast asia.</p><p>To reiterate, turning the other cheek is a fine ideal, but tends to go badly when you run into someone who sees you as food for his dogs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not big on violence myself , but reality can be a bit intrusive.If you do n't want weapons , do n't see any need even for defensive weapons , you might want to avoid boating near Somalia or some noted places in southeast asia.To reiterate , turning the other cheek is a fine ideal , but tends to go badly when you run into someone who sees you as food for his dogs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not big on violence myself, but reality can be a bit intrusive.If you don't want weapons, don't see any need even for defensive weapons, you might want to avoid boating near Somalia or some noted places in southeast asia.To reiterate, turning the other cheek is a fine ideal, but tends to go badly when you run into someone who sees you as food for his dogs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402</id>
	<title>Pacifist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264000740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe I'm being a bit too much of a pacifist here, but why are we constantly spending so much time developing newer ways to kill ourselves.. seems like we could better use those resources.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I 'm being a bit too much of a pacifist here , but why are we constantly spending so much time developing newer ways to kill ourselves.. seems like we could better use those resources .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I'm being a bit too much of a pacifist here, but why are we constantly spending so much time developing newer ways to kill ourselves.. seems like we could better use those resources.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832610</id>
	<title>Re:First Dune Post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264005960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Muad'dib!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Muad'dib !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Muad'dib!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834778</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>Cormacus</author>
	<datestamp>1264013940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The issue that's being hinted at here is that governments have been looking for "non-lethal" crowd control devices like this - devices that (because of their supposed non-lethality) will be used more frequently by law enforcement (think handguns vs tasers).  The fact these "non-lethal" devices turn out later to have serious health repercussions (up to and including death) is all the more reason to worry about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The issue that 's being hinted at here is that governments have been looking for " non-lethal " crowd control devices like this - devices that ( because of their supposed non-lethality ) will be used more frequently by law enforcement ( think handguns vs tasers ) .
The fact these " non-lethal " devices turn out later to have serious health repercussions ( up to and including death ) is all the more reason to worry about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The issue that's being hinted at here is that governments have been looking for "non-lethal" crowd control devices like this - devices that (because of their supposed non-lethality) will be used more frequently by law enforcement (think handguns vs tasers).
The fact these "non-lethal" devices turn out later to have serious health repercussions (up to and including death) is all the more reason to worry about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832168</id>
	<title>Re:Pacifist</title>
	<author>Duradin</author>
	<datestamp>1264004220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Maybe I'm being a bit too much of a pacifist here, but why are we constantly spending so much time developing newer ways to kill ourselves.. seems like we could better use those resources."</p><p>Because then the people who spent their resources on developing new ways to kill use those innovations on the people that didn't.</p><p>Also, finding new ways or better ways to kill has been one of the great motivational forces for human innovation since the first caveman figured out a stone attached to a stick will hit harder then just the stone held in his hand. Societies that didn't keep up with metallurgical advances tended to be wiped out by those that did, so to them spending resources on ways to kill meant they had a chance to preserve (and expand) their culture and thus it was a very good use of their resources.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Maybe I 'm being a bit too much of a pacifist here , but why are we constantly spending so much time developing newer ways to kill ourselves.. seems like we could better use those resources .
" Because then the people who spent their resources on developing new ways to kill use those innovations on the people that did n't.Also , finding new ways or better ways to kill has been one of the great motivational forces for human innovation since the first caveman figured out a stone attached to a stick will hit harder then just the stone held in his hand .
Societies that did n't keep up with metallurgical advances tended to be wiped out by those that did , so to them spending resources on ways to kill meant they had a chance to preserve ( and expand ) their culture and thus it was a very good use of their resources .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Maybe I'm being a bit too much of a pacifist here, but why are we constantly spending so much time developing newer ways to kill ourselves.. seems like we could better use those resources.
"Because then the people who spent their resources on developing new ways to kill use those innovations on the people that didn't.Also, finding new ways or better ways to kill has been one of the great motivational forces for human innovation since the first caveman figured out a stone attached to a stick will hit harder then just the stone held in his hand.
Societies that didn't keep up with metallurgical advances tended to be wiped out by those that did, so to them spending resources on ways to kill meant they had a chance to preserve (and expand) their culture and thus it was a very good use of their resources.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833402</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264008600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I grew up hunting and fishing. I had to pass what was then the bronze, silver and gold small calibre standards. A 20 gauge over and under and a colt 45 remain my favourite weapons although I no longer own guns or hunt. I'm unaware of any permanent damage to hearing caused by handguns, unless you're specifically speaking to indoor ranges. My hearing tests out excellent and I'd hate to see the carnage and spent rounds my years of hunting and target shooting would amount to.</p></div><p>I shoot guns and I don't have hearing damage therefore guns don't cause hearing damage!  Scientific proof right there!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I grew up hunting and fishing .
I had to pass what was then the bronze , silver and gold small calibre standards .
A 20 gauge over and under and a colt 45 remain my favourite weapons although I no longer own guns or hunt .
I 'm unaware of any permanent damage to hearing caused by handguns , unless you 're specifically speaking to indoor ranges .
My hearing tests out excellent and I 'd hate to see the carnage and spent rounds my years of hunting and target shooting would amount to.I shoot guns and I do n't have hearing damage therefore guns do n't cause hearing damage !
Scientific proof right there !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I grew up hunting and fishing.
I had to pass what was then the bronze, silver and gold small calibre standards.
A 20 gauge over and under and a colt 45 remain my favourite weapons although I no longer own guns or hunt.
I'm unaware of any permanent damage to hearing caused by handguns, unless you're specifically speaking to indoor ranges.
My hearing tests out excellent and I'd hate to see the carnage and spent rounds my years of hunting and target shooting would amount to.I shoot guns and I don't have hearing damage therefore guns don't cause hearing damage!
Scientific proof right there!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833146</id>
	<title>Re:IAF Sound Devices</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264007820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is not the only sound based non-lethal weapon used by the IAF</p></div><p>This is not the only sound based lethal weapon used by the IAF.
 </p><p>
There fixed that for you.
 </p><p>
Hmm<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... sound can kill. Thank you Captain Obvious for pointing that out to us<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>
again<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>
and again<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>
and again<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not the only sound based non-lethal weapon used by the IAFThis is not the only sound based lethal weapon used by the IAF .
There fixed that for you .
Hmm ... sound can kill .
Thank you Captain Obvious for pointing that out to us .. . again .. . and again .. . and again .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not the only sound based non-lethal weapon used by the IAFThis is not the only sound based lethal weapon used by the IAF.
There fixed that for you.
Hmm ... sound can kill.
Thank you Captain Obvious for pointing that out to us ...
again ...
and again ...
and again ...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834214</id>
	<title>Re:IAF Sound Devices</title>
	<author>cstacy</author>
	<datestamp>1264011600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think they were also toying with using these types of weapons against the pirates in Somalia.</p></div><p>Not sure that would be effective against light sabers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they were also toying with using these types of weapons against the pirates in Somalia.Not sure that would be effective against light sabers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they were also toying with using these types of weapons against the pirates in Somalia.Not sure that would be effective against light sabers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833720</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>putnondritz</author>
	<datestamp>1264009680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I don't see the big news here".

Perhaps to keep in the forefront the fact that the militarized police in the USA have these weapons at the ready for crowd control, if not crowd decimation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I do n't see the big news here " .
Perhaps to keep in the forefront the fact that the militarized police in the USA have these weapons at the ready for crowd control , if not crowd decimation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I don't see the big news here".
Perhaps to keep in the forefront the fact that the militarized police in the USA have these weapons at the ready for crowd control, if not crowd decimation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836734</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>raynet</author>
	<datestamp>1263978600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, didn't know things were so bad in US, the police goes on and tasers everyone once per year.. *sigh*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , did n't know things were so bad in US , the police goes on and tasers everyone once per year.. * sigh *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, didn't know things were so bad in US, the police goes on and tasers everyone once per year.. *sigh*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831444</id>
	<title>Re:The A-Team</title>
	<author>Lord Byron II</author>
	<datestamp>1264000920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Taking a cue from MythBusters the other day, I want to use this to tenderize meat. How would you like your steak? Oh, 10 meters and medium rare, please!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Taking a cue from MythBusters the other day , I want to use this to tenderize meat .
How would you like your steak ?
Oh , 10 meters and medium rare , please !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Taking a cue from MythBusters the other day, I want to use this to tenderize meat.
How would you like your steak?
Oh, 10 meters and medium rare, please!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831458</id>
	<title>IAF Sound Devices</title>
	<author>smitty777</author>
	<datestamp>1264000920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is not the only sound based non-lethal weapon used by the IAF.  They also use a device called <a href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/050708nonlethalweapons" title="wanttoknow.info">The Scream</a> [wanttoknow.info], which emits a sound that causes disorientation and nausea. This one works at low, inaudible frequencies that vibrate the internal organs of the targets.  There is also an high frequency version that is audible, that also produces a burning sensation on the skin (but does not produce any permanent damage).     <br>
&nbsp; <br>I think they were also toying with using these types of weapons against the pirates in Somalia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not the only sound based non-lethal weapon used by the IAF .
They also use a device called The Scream [ wanttoknow.info ] , which emits a sound that causes disorientation and nausea .
This one works at low , inaudible frequencies that vibrate the internal organs of the targets .
There is also an high frequency version that is audible , that also produces a burning sensation on the skin ( but does not produce any permanent damage ) .
  I think they were also toying with using these types of weapons against the pirates in Somalia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not the only sound based non-lethal weapon used by the IAF.
They also use a device called The Scream [wanttoknow.info], which emits a sound that causes disorientation and nausea.
This one works at low, inaudible frequencies that vibrate the internal organs of the targets.
There is also an high frequency version that is audible, that also produces a burning sensation on the skin (but does not produce any permanent damage).
  I think they were also toying with using these types of weapons against the pirates in Somalia.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831716</id>
	<title>Know what else is lethal at 10 meters?</title>
	<author>Zantac69</author>
	<datestamp>1264002060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>American Idol (the 'real competition' portion - not the auditions that are sometimes hilarious), Eurovision Song Contest, and America/Britain's Got Talent.  Within 10 meters, all of these can be lethal to people with IQs greater than 75.  At distances greater than 10 meters, I am not sure of the lethality...but just hearing it causes me to double over with pain.</htmltext>
<tokenext>American Idol ( the 'real competition ' portion - not the auditions that are sometimes hilarious ) , Eurovision Song Contest , and America/Britain 's Got Talent .
Within 10 meters , all of these can be lethal to people with IQs greater than 75 .
At distances greater than 10 meters , I am not sure of the lethality...but just hearing it causes me to double over with pain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>American Idol (the 'real competition' portion - not the auditions that are sometimes hilarious), Eurovision Song Contest, and America/Britain's Got Talent.
Within 10 meters, all of these can be lethal to people with IQs greater than 75.
At distances greater than 10 meters, I am not sure of the lethality...but just hearing it causes me to double over with pain.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832498</id>
	<title>Pictures</title>
	<author>ijakings</author>
	<datestamp>1264005540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pics, or it didnt happen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pics , or it didnt happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pics, or it didnt happen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831788</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>GerardAtJob</author>
	<datestamp>1264002480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn... just patent that and create a device that remove body hair with sonic blast!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn... just patent that and create a device that remove body hair with sonic blast !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn... just patent that and create a device that remove body hair with sonic blast!
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834718</id>
	<title>Next on the drawing board</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1264013640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A sonic weapon that goes up to eleven.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A sonic weapon that goes up to eleven .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A sonic weapon that goes up to eleven.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832332</id>
	<title>...a sound that could kill...</title>
	<author>bmwloco</author>
	<datestamp>1264004940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kate Bush wrote a song about is over 20 years ago.  Move on folks..nothing interesting here<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kate Bush wrote a song about is over 20 years ago .
Move on folks..nothing interesting here ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kate Bush wrote a song about is over 20 years ago.
Move on folks..nothing interesting here ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835738</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264017480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to mention that a less-lethal weapon is more likely to be used.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention that a less-lethal weapon is more likely to be used .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention that a less-lethal weapon is more likely to be used.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831924</id>
	<title>Squawk Box anyone?</title>
	<author>davFr</author>
	<datestamp>1264003080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am surprised you don't know the Squawk Box, which was used by the Brits again the Irish demonstrators. This box was a secret weapon used to cause non-lethal injuries, "thanks" to powerful acoustic waves.<br>
And no, it was not Beatles' music.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am surprised you do n't know the Squawk Box , which was used by the Brits again the Irish demonstrators .
This box was a secret weapon used to cause non-lethal injuries , " thanks " to powerful acoustic waves .
And no , it was not Beatles ' music .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am surprised you don't know the Squawk Box, which was used by the Brits again the Irish demonstrators.
This box was a secret weapon used to cause non-lethal injuries, "thanks" to powerful acoustic waves.
And no, it was not Beatles' music.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831438</id>
	<title>Jon-Erik Hexum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264000860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon-Erik\_Hexum" title="wikipedia.org">Things harmless at range can kill at contact distance.</a> [wikipedia.org]  That's why some blind people with licenses to carry concealed handguns use blanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Things harmless at range can kill at contact distance .
[ wikipedia.org ] That 's why some blind people with licenses to carry concealed handguns use blanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Things harmless at range can kill at contact distance.
[wikipedia.org]  That's why some blind people with licenses to carry concealed handguns use blanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834370</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1264012200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think the big issue here is that some government(s) will no doubt be using this to break up protests or at any time when other less-than-lethal weapons would have been used in the past.</p></div><p>Well I'm absolutely positively sure that <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/09/28/g20-protesters-blast.html" title="boingboing.net">nothing like that</a> [boingboing.net] would ever happen in the Land of the Free.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the big issue here is that some government ( s ) will no doubt be using this to break up protests or at any time when other less-than-lethal weapons would have been used in the past.Well I 'm absolutely positively sure that nothing like that [ boingboing.net ] would ever happen in the Land of the Free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the big issue here is that some government(s) will no doubt be using this to break up protests or at any time when other less-than-lethal weapons would have been used in the past.Well I'm absolutely positively sure that nothing like that [boingboing.net] would ever happen in the Land of the Free.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831808</id>
	<title>Re:Pacifist</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1264002540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's primary purpose is to end a threat without killing.  Which, oddly enough, is the purpose of weapons for non-evil folk.</p><p>Generally, even crooks don't want to kill people, they just want to deter you from interfering with their crime.  Some bad guys revel in killing, but that's why we dedicate a segment of our society to dealing with them: police and military.  It's unfortunate, but the bad guys don't give a shit about what is fair or the resources wasted on deterring, persuing, trying and imprisoning.  They are inconsiderate dicks.  So we either have to submit to them or resist them.  Sometimes the don't stop being mean because "it's wrong" or when we ask them politely.  Sometimes resisting them means causing them pain or death.  The option of: "live on a planet without bad guys" is not available yet. i think someday it could be.</p><p>This system is designed to make non-hardcore but still potentially dangerous folk to drop their molotovs and go away.  There are less than lethal systems that seem less destructive than this.  However, a blast from this is more survivable than a blast from an AR 15 or AK 47.  The US military has rules for escalation of force in dealing with civilians*.  If they use sticks and rocks, our soldiers can respond with non-lethal force.  If they bring lethal weapons to the party, they become (unlawful) combatants and it's "open fire". i'd like for our soldiers to come home without having shot and killed civilians who got out of hand.  i'd like for any place we occupy to have as few civilian deaths as possible, so i think working on systems like this is a good thing.</p><p>This particular system needs work. It might be useful only on ships.</p><p>* Civilian != innocent</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's primary purpose is to end a threat without killing .
Which , oddly enough , is the purpose of weapons for non-evil folk.Generally , even crooks do n't want to kill people , they just want to deter you from interfering with their crime .
Some bad guys revel in killing , but that 's why we dedicate a segment of our society to dealing with them : police and military .
It 's unfortunate , but the bad guys do n't give a shit about what is fair or the resources wasted on deterring , persuing , trying and imprisoning .
They are inconsiderate dicks .
So we either have to submit to them or resist them .
Sometimes the do n't stop being mean because " it 's wrong " or when we ask them politely .
Sometimes resisting them means causing them pain or death .
The option of : " live on a planet without bad guys " is not available yet .
i think someday it could be.This system is designed to make non-hardcore but still potentially dangerous folk to drop their molotovs and go away .
There are less than lethal systems that seem less destructive than this .
However , a blast from this is more survivable than a blast from an AR 15 or AK 47 .
The US military has rules for escalation of force in dealing with civilians * .
If they use sticks and rocks , our soldiers can respond with non-lethal force .
If they bring lethal weapons to the party , they become ( unlawful ) combatants and it 's " open fire " .
i 'd like for our soldiers to come home without having shot and killed civilians who got out of hand .
i 'd like for any place we occupy to have as few civilian deaths as possible , so i think working on systems like this is a good thing.This particular system needs work .
It might be useful only on ships .
* Civilian ! = innocent</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's primary purpose is to end a threat without killing.
Which, oddly enough, is the purpose of weapons for non-evil folk.Generally, even crooks don't want to kill people, they just want to deter you from interfering with their crime.
Some bad guys revel in killing, but that's why we dedicate a segment of our society to dealing with them: police and military.
It's unfortunate, but the bad guys don't give a shit about what is fair or the resources wasted on deterring, persuing, trying and imprisoning.
They are inconsiderate dicks.
So we either have to submit to them or resist them.
Sometimes the don't stop being mean because "it's wrong" or when we ask them politely.
Sometimes resisting them means causing them pain or death.
The option of: "live on a planet without bad guys" is not available yet.
i think someday it could be.This system is designed to make non-hardcore but still potentially dangerous folk to drop their molotovs and go away.
There are less than lethal systems that seem less destructive than this.
However, a blast from this is more survivable than a blast from an AR 15 or AK 47.
The US military has rules for escalation of force in dealing with civilians*.
If they use sticks and rocks, our soldiers can respond with non-lethal force.
If they bring lethal weapons to the party, they become (unlawful) combatants and it's "open fire".
i'd like for our soldiers to come home without having shot and killed civilians who got out of hand.
i'd like for any place we occupy to have as few civilian deaths as possible, so i think working on systems like this is a good thing.This particular system needs work.
It might be useful only on ships.
* Civilian != innocent</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832586</id>
	<title>Re:TFA SAID, "RELATIVELY HARMLESS"!!!</title>
	<author>GiveBenADollar</author>
	<datestamp>1264005900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Civilian harmless = You can't possibly hurt yourself with it. Examples include... Nerf bats... nope. Water... nope. Play dough. nope. Hmmm. have to find an example.</p><p>Military harmless = You have to be negligent or intentionally trying to hurt someone with it. Examples: Lawn Darts. Nerf Bats. Tear Gas. (Yes tear gas is unpleasant, but it is designed not to cause permanent harm.)</p><p>Rubber bullets are in the same category of mostly harmless. They leave bruises, but are not designed to kill. That doesn't mean they can't be intentionally or negligently lethal, just that they are not designed to kill, kinda like lawn darts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Civilian harmless = You ca n't possibly hurt yourself with it .
Examples include... Nerf bats... nope. Water... nope. Play dough .
nope. Hmmm .
have to find an example.Military harmless = You have to be negligent or intentionally trying to hurt someone with it .
Examples : Lawn Darts .
Nerf Bats .
Tear Gas .
( Yes tear gas is unpleasant , but it is designed not to cause permanent harm .
) Rubber bullets are in the same category of mostly harmless .
They leave bruises , but are not designed to kill .
That does n't mean they ca n't be intentionally or negligently lethal , just that they are not designed to kill , kinda like lawn darts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Civilian harmless = You can't possibly hurt yourself with it.
Examples include... Nerf bats... nope. Water... nope. Play dough.
nope. Hmmm.
have to find an example.Military harmless = You have to be negligent or intentionally trying to hurt someone with it.
Examples: Lawn Darts.
Nerf Bats.
Tear Gas.
(Yes tear gas is unpleasant, but it is designed not to cause permanent harm.
)Rubber bullets are in the same category of mostly harmless.
They leave bruises, but are not designed to kill.
That doesn't mean they can't be intentionally or negligently lethal, just that they are not designed to kill, kinda like lawn darts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831586</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832384</id>
	<title>Re:Pacifist</title>
	<author>wisdom\_brewing</author>
	<datestamp>1264005180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unless the "crook" in question is an assassin... <br> <br>If they didn't want to kill people, I'd advise they see a career advisor...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless the " crook " in question is an assassin... If they did n't want to kill people , I 'd advise they see a career advisor.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless the "crook" in question is an assassin...  If they didn't want to kill people, I'd advise they see a career advisor...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836414</id>
	<title>Counter measures</title>
	<author>stapedium</author>
	<datestamp>1264020420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure earplugs, a helmet and a heavy jacket would be an effective counter measure for this thing.  Earplugs and an motorcycle helmet can shield your hearing from continurous noise up to around 150 dBA. The mass of a thick jacket should filter out any high frequency components of the impulses.  Just add a plexiglass shield for the low frequencies and you should be able to rush this thing and kick it over.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure earplugs , a helmet and a heavy jacket would be an effective counter measure for this thing .
Earplugs and an motorcycle helmet can shield your hearing from continurous noise up to around 150 dBA .
The mass of a thick jacket should filter out any high frequency components of the impulses .
Just add a plexiglass shield for the low frequencies and you should be able to rush this thing and kick it over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure earplugs, a helmet and a heavy jacket would be an effective counter measure for this thing.
Earplugs and an motorcycle helmet can shield your hearing from continurous noise up to around 150 dBA.
The mass of a thick jacket should filter out any high frequency components of the impulses.
Just add a plexiglass shield for the low frequencies and you should be able to rush this thing and kick it over.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832816</id>
	<title>tested on Kittens?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264006680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What would it do to a basket full of kittens?</p><p>Or perhaps a disoriented 4 year old?</p><p>These things are to be used on groups of people to drive them<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. infants and old people, not just the 17 year old kid. My father talks about being in Washington DC on a peaceful march against the war with family's including kids and being tear-gassed by the police. So now you and your kids can look forward to this.</p><p>We live in interesting times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What would it do to a basket full of kittens ? Or perhaps a disoriented 4 year old ? These things are to be used on groups of people to drive them .. infants and old people , not just the 17 year old kid .
My father talks about being in Washington DC on a peaceful march against the war with family 's including kids and being tear-gassed by the police .
So now you and your kids can look forward to this.We live in interesting times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would it do to a basket full of kittens?Or perhaps a disoriented 4 year old?These things are to be used on groups of people to drive them .. infants and old people, not just the 17 year old kid.
My father talks about being in Washington DC on a peaceful march against the war with family's including kids and being tear-gassed by the police.
So now you and your kids can look forward to this.We live in interesting times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835250</id>
	<title>Re:Pacifist</title>
	<author>CompMD</author>
	<datestamp>1264015800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because it means we are constantly deriving useful technologies from what we develop to kill.  Note that the largest and most complex weapons platform mankind has ever created (a Nimitz class aircraft carrier) is providing power and desalinated water to people in Haiti right now.  We built bombs to devastate Japan which led to the creation of the cleanest, most efficient power generation technology we have ever had.  I could go on, but the list of useful technologies developed from weapons and warfare is huge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it means we are constantly deriving useful technologies from what we develop to kill .
Note that the largest and most complex weapons platform mankind has ever created ( a Nimitz class aircraft carrier ) is providing power and desalinated water to people in Haiti right now .
We built bombs to devastate Japan which led to the creation of the cleanest , most efficient power generation technology we have ever had .
I could go on , but the list of useful technologies developed from weapons and warfare is huge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it means we are constantly deriving useful technologies from what we develop to kill.
Note that the largest and most complex weapons platform mankind has ever created (a Nimitz class aircraft carrier) is providing power and desalinated water to people in Haiti right now.
We built bombs to devastate Japan which led to the creation of the cleanest, most efficient power generation technology we have ever had.
I could go on, but the list of useful technologies developed from weapons and warfare is huge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831442</id>
	<title>Wrong summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264000920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shockwaves != sound waves</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shockwaves ! = sound waves</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shockwaves != sound waves</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831520</id>
	<title>How fast?</title>
	<author>zenopus</author>
	<datestamp>1264001220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>According to company data, the system generates 60 to 100 bursts per minute, each traveling at about 2,000 meters per second and lasting up to 300 milliseconds.</p></div><p>It is pretty impressive they can make a burst of sound move at six times the speed of sound.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to company data , the system generates 60 to 100 bursts per minute , each traveling at about 2,000 meters per second and lasting up to 300 milliseconds.It is pretty impressive they can make a burst of sound move at six times the speed of sound .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to company data, the system generates 60 to 100 bursts per minute, each traveling at about 2,000 meters per second and lasting up to 300 milliseconds.It is pretty impressive they can make a burst of sound move at six times the speed of sound.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831610</id>
	<title>Weirding module</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264001640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My name is a killing word.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My name is a killing word .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My name is a killing word.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834870</id>
	<title>Re:Know what else is lethal at 10 meters?</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1264014360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Eurovision Song Contest</p></div><p>Uhm. I kind of liked the Secret Garden's entry in 1995. (But then again, there was very little opening of the mouth in that piece.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Eurovision Song ContestUhm .
I kind of liked the Secret Garden 's entry in 1995 .
( But then again , there was very little opening of the mouth in that piece .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eurovision Song ContestUhm.
I kind of liked the Secret Garden's entry in 1995.
(But then again, there was very little opening of the mouth in that piece.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836020</id>
	<title>I still got 'em beat</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1264018680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My farts are deadly up to 100 miles away.</p><p>How's that for a sonic cannon?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My farts are deadly up to 100 miles away.How 's that for a sonic cannon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My farts are deadly up to 100 miles away.How's that for a sonic cannon?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831796</id>
	<title>Now Available: Sonic Armor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264002480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Extremely light-weight and very wearable, sonic armor is now being sold.  Crafted of 'soundproof' ceiling tiles it just might be enough to let you keep your lunch next time such a weapon is aimed at you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Extremely light-weight and very wearable , sonic armor is now being sold .
Crafted of 'soundproof ' ceiling tiles it just might be enough to let you keep your lunch next time such a weapon is aimed at you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Extremely light-weight and very wearable, sonic armor is now being sold.
Crafted of 'soundproof' ceiling tiles it just might be enough to let you keep your lunch next time such a weapon is aimed at you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30840860</id>
	<title>Re:When 11 Just Isn't Loud Enough...</title>
	<author>Eli Gottlieb</author>
	<datestamp>1263996600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh thank God, I was worrying nobody would make a <i>Hitchhiker's Guide</i> reference!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh thank God , I was worrying nobody would make a Hitchhiker 's Guide reference !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh thank God, I was worrying nobody would make a Hitchhiker's Guide reference!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836648</id>
	<title>Could it be dangerous at farther distances?</title>
	<author>yellekc</author>
	<datestamp>1263978240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This device was designed for the relatively open space of a farm. In urban environments where this may be used, you will get reflections off large flat surfaces. Constructive interference will create some areas of higher sound pressure than might be predicted by the distance alone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This device was designed for the relatively open space of a farm .
In urban environments where this may be used , you will get reflections off large flat surfaces .
Constructive interference will create some areas of higher sound pressure than might be predicted by the distance alone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This device was designed for the relatively open space of a farm.
In urban environments where this may be used, you will get reflections off large flat surfaces.
Constructive interference will create some areas of higher sound pressure than might be predicted by the distance alone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831572</id>
	<title>Super Villians</title>
	<author>GPLDAN</author>
	<datestamp>1264001460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Turns out a single badass Deltal only known by his codename 'Dutch' (real name: Alan Schaeffer) killed a space alien in the jungle after a protracted stalking, and procured this weapon from the alien armor suit. The alien had managed to kill the rest of Dutch's team but somehow Dutch set off a low yield nuclear weapon and destroy the creature. This report was leaked by the tin foil underground movement, and is the real source of this new weapon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Turns out a single badass Deltal only known by his codename 'Dutch ' ( real name : Alan Schaeffer ) killed a space alien in the jungle after a protracted stalking , and procured this weapon from the alien armor suit .
The alien had managed to kill the rest of Dutch 's team but somehow Dutch set off a low yield nuclear weapon and destroy the creature .
This report was leaked by the tin foil underground movement , and is the real source of this new weapon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Turns out a single badass Deltal only known by his codename 'Dutch' (real name: Alan Schaeffer) killed a space alien in the jungle after a protracted stalking, and procured this weapon from the alien armor suit.
The alien had managed to kill the rest of Dutch's team but somehow Dutch set off a low yield nuclear weapon and destroy the creature.
This report was leaked by the tin foil underground movement, and is the real source of this new weapon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831586</id>
	<title>Re:TFA SAID, "RELATIVELY HARMLESS"!!!</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1264001520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>In military parlance, "relatively harmless" means something different than what it does in the civilian world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In military parlance , " relatively harmless " means something different than what it does in the civilian world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In military parlance, "relatively harmless" means something different than what it does in the civilian world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832266</id>
	<title>Just a variation on a carbide cannon</title>
	<author>cwills</author>
	<datestamp>1264004640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Different fuel, but basically the same idea as a carbide cannon which has been around for at least 100 years.  In fact there was a patent from the early 1900's (US 874,952) on an improved gas gun.
<p>
So, basically all that is <i>new</i> is the recharge time and the decibels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Different fuel , but basically the same idea as a carbide cannon which has been around for at least 100 years .
In fact there was a patent from the early 1900 's ( US 874,952 ) on an improved gas gun .
So , basically all that is new is the recharge time and the decibels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Different fuel, but basically the same idea as a carbide cannon which has been around for at least 100 years.
In fact there was a patent from the early 1900's (US 874,952) on an improved gas gun.
So, basically all that is new is the recharge time and the decibels.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835124</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>JerryLove</author>
	<datestamp>1264015380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The deal is that the *point* of the item is to *not* kill.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The deal is that the * point * of the item is to * not * kill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The deal is that the *point* of the item is to *not* kill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831516</id>
	<title>Disaster Area is okay, but...</title>
	<author>No Grand Plan</author>
	<datestamp>1264001220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I prefer the much-more subtle (and slightly less fictional) Kate Bush, with "Experiment IV."<br> <br>
"...and they told us/what they wanted/was a sound that could kill someone"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer the much-more subtle ( and slightly less fictional ) Kate Bush , with " Experiment IV .
" " ...and they told us/what they wanted/was a sound that could kill someone "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer the much-more subtle (and slightly less fictional) Kate Bush, with "Experiment IV.
" 
"...and they told us/what they wanted/was a sound that could kill someone"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832084</id>
	<title>Weirding module</title>
	<author>CDS</author>
	<datestamp>1264003740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weirding\_Module/" title="wikipedia.org">Weirding Module</a> [wikipedia.org]!! So do you have to chant "muuuuad-DIB!" to make it fire??</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a Weirding Module [ wikipedia.org ] ! !
So do you have to chant " muuuuad-DIB !
" to make it fire ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a Weirding Module [wikipedia.org]!!
So do you have to chant "muuuuad-DIB!
" to make it fire?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835676</id>
	<title>Really ?!</title>
	<author>feufeu</author>
	<datestamp>1264017180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"a mixture of liquefied petroleum, cooking gas, and air to create explosions"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...will do pemanent damage to the human body - hear, hear !

(Nothing really new here, move along !)</htmltext>
<tokenext>" a mixture of liquefied petroleum , cooking gas , and air to create explosions " ...will do pemanent damage to the human body - hear , hear !
( Nothing really new here , move along !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"a mixture of liquefied petroleum, cooking gas, and air to create explosions" ...will do pemanent damage to the human body - hear, hear !
(Nothing really new here, move along !
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836226</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>budgenator</author>
	<datestamp>1264019640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you mean governments like <a href="http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/4938/protesting\_the\_g-20\_summit" title="inthesetimes.com">Pittsburgh</a> [inthesetimes.com]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you mean governments like Pittsburgh [ inthesetimes.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you mean governments like Pittsburgh [inthesetimes.com]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831566</id>
	<title>Wait...what?</title>
	<author>Orleron</author>
	<datestamp>1264001400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't the people firing the boomsday device be killed, since they are right next to it pulling the trigger?<br>
If you mount it on top of a humvee, same problem, no?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't the people firing the boomsday device be killed , since they are right next to it pulling the trigger ?
If you mount it on top of a humvee , same problem , no ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't the people firing the boomsday device be killed, since they are right next to it pulling the trigger?
If you mount it on top of a humvee, same problem, no?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835726</id>
	<title>This has been done before</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264017420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just go to Taco Bell and order three double stuffed burritos.  It's equally as effective.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just go to Taco Bell and order three double stuffed burritos .
It 's equally as effective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just go to Taco Bell and order three double stuffed burritos.
It's equally as effective.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831628</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>precariousgray</author>
	<datestamp>1264001760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Five dollars?  At close range, I could kill somebody for free!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Five dollars ?
At close range , I could kill somebody for free !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Five dollars?
At close range, I could kill somebody for free!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833928</id>
	<title>Re:Potato Cannons</title>
	<author>dunkelfalke</author>
	<datestamp>1264010520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, potato is potentially lethal - green potatos and potato berries and seeds contain solanine which is a poison.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , potato is potentially lethal - green potatos and potato berries and seeds contain solanine which is a poison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, potato is potentially lethal - green potatos and potato berries and seeds contain solanine which is a poison.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831640</id>
	<title>Potato Cannons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264001760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> Even something like a $5 potato cannon can kill people at close range.</p></div></blockquote><p>Dude, don't start it up. Those folks in Idaho are a thin skinned bunch.</p><p>The Idaho Potatoe Council, through their spokesman, Spuddy Buddy, want to reiterate that, "Potatoes don't kill people, people kill people."</p><p>"The potatoe is a non-lethal vegetable. In fact, there is only one tuber that is considered a weapon, but it is grown only in the upper most reaches of the Andeas on the boarders of Chile and Peru," Buddy went on to say.</p><p>Did you know millions of potatoes have been shipped around the world as humanitarian relief. Not a single one has been used in military agression. There has only been one instance of a potato being used to kill. That was the aforementioned Peruvian Murder Spud (rough translation) that the CIA used in an assasination attempt on the husband of Evita Peron.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even something like a $ 5 potato cannon can kill people at close range.Dude , do n't start it up .
Those folks in Idaho are a thin skinned bunch.The Idaho Potatoe Council , through their spokesman , Spuddy Buddy , want to reiterate that , " Potatoes do n't kill people , people kill people .
" " The potatoe is a non-lethal vegetable .
In fact , there is only one tuber that is considered a weapon , but it is grown only in the upper most reaches of the Andeas on the boarders of Chile and Peru , " Buddy went on to say.Did you know millions of potatoes have been shipped around the world as humanitarian relief .
Not a single one has been used in military agression .
There has only been one instance of a potato being used to kill .
That was the aforementioned Peruvian Murder Spud ( rough translation ) that the CIA used in an assasination attempt on the husband of Evita Peron .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Even something like a $5 potato cannon can kill people at close range.Dude, don't start it up.
Those folks in Idaho are a thin skinned bunch.The Idaho Potatoe Council, through their spokesman, Spuddy Buddy, want to reiterate that, "Potatoes don't kill people, people kill people.
""The potatoe is a non-lethal vegetable.
In fact, there is only one tuber that is considered a weapon, but it is grown only in the upper most reaches of the Andeas on the boarders of Chile and Peru," Buddy went on to say.Did you know millions of potatoes have been shipped around the world as humanitarian relief.
Not a single one has been used in military agression.
There has only been one instance of a potato being used to kill.
That was the aforementioned Peruvian Murder Spud (rough translation) that the CIA used in an assasination attempt on the husband of Evita Peron.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831478</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264001040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...the ringing you hear in your ears afterward is still a set of frequencies you'll never hear again.</p></div><p>+1. It's amazing to me how many people don't understand this point. I've got hearing loss and tinnitus and it is a genuine disability. The developers of these things will argue, "well it's better than shooting people," but I'm not sure that's the only alternative.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...the ringing you hear in your ears afterward is still a set of frequencies you 'll never hear again. + 1 .
It 's amazing to me how many people do n't understand this point .
I 've got hearing loss and tinnitus and it is a genuine disability .
The developers of these things will argue , " well it 's better than shooting people , " but I 'm not sure that 's the only alternative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...the ringing you hear in your ears afterward is still a set of frequencies you'll never hear again.+1.
It's amazing to me how many people don't understand this point.
I've got hearing loss and tinnitus and it is a genuine disability.
The developers of these things will argue, "well it's better than shooting people," but I'm not sure that's the only alternative.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831440</id>
	<title>Re:Top news as it happens on Slashdot!</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1264000860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's news because<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. will rail against this tech as being a tool of oppression that Bush will use on peaceful protesters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's news because / .
will rail against this tech as being a tool of oppression that Bush will use on peaceful protesters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's news because /.
will rail against this tech as being a tool of oppression that Bush will use on peaceful protesters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832836</id>
	<title>Oh, the irony of greed</title>
	<author>piotru</author>
	<datestamp>1264006740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently, the Israeli patented the pulse engine, used in V1 rockets by German Army during the WW2. Oh well... Where's the trick? Did the Germans fail to patent pulse engine for non-racial killing, did they limit the lethal direction, or or was their patent invalidated in 1945?</p><p>From the linked article:<br>"Using a patented process involving Pulse Detonation Technology (PDT), the system feeds the gas-air mixture into one or more so-called impulse chambers or cannon barrels, where the burning fuel detonates and intensifies in force as it travels through the chamber, exiting in a rapid-fire succession of high-velocity shock bursts."<br>V1:<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-1\_flying\_bomb" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-1\_flying\_bomb</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently , the Israeli patented the pulse engine , used in V1 rockets by German Army during the WW2 .
Oh well... Where 's the trick ?
Did the Germans fail to patent pulse engine for non-racial killing , did they limit the lethal direction , or or was their patent invalidated in 1945 ? From the linked article : " Using a patented process involving Pulse Detonation Technology ( PDT ) , the system feeds the gas-air mixture into one or more so-called impulse chambers or cannon barrels , where the burning fuel detonates and intensifies in force as it travels through the chamber , exiting in a rapid-fire succession of high-velocity shock bursts .
" V1 : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-1 \ _flying \ _bomb [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently, the Israeli patented the pulse engine, used in V1 rockets by German Army during the WW2.
Oh well... Where's the trick?
Did the Germans fail to patent pulse engine for non-racial killing, did they limit the lethal direction, or or was their patent invalidated in 1945?From the linked article:"Using a patented process involving Pulse Detonation Technology (PDT), the system feeds the gas-air mixture into one or more so-called impulse chambers or cannon barrels, where the burning fuel detonates and intensifies in force as it travels through the chamber, exiting in a rapid-fire succession of high-velocity shock bursts.
"V1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-1\_flying\_bomb [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832804</id>
	<title>News in 2010</title>
	<author>markov\_chain</author>
	<datestamp>1264006620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Army invents the sonic trap!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Army invents the sonic trap !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Army invents the sonic trap!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832494</id>
	<title>Marketing?</title>
	<author>Corson</author>
	<datestamp>1264005540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's right, publish that information on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./ maybe someone will become "creative" and use that information to new purposes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's right , publish that information on ./ maybe someone will become " creative " and use that information to new purposes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's right, publish that information on ./ maybe someone will become "creative" and use that information to new purposes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834792</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>jpmorgan</author>
	<datestamp>1264014000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, in the past governments just used the much safer practice of billy sticks, rubber bullets and blunt force trauma. As we all know, nobody ever died from being beaten by a metal stick, and 'cracking skulls' is simply a jocular expression.</p><p>I'm not saying these things are terribly safe, but it seems that when talking about 'less-than lethal' weapons, most people lose all sense of perspective.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , in the past governments just used the much safer practice of billy sticks , rubber bullets and blunt force trauma .
As we all know , nobody ever died from being beaten by a metal stick , and 'cracking skulls ' is simply a jocular expression.I 'm not saying these things are terribly safe , but it seems that when talking about 'less-than lethal ' weapons , most people lose all sense of perspective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, in the past governments just used the much safer practice of billy sticks, rubber bullets and blunt force trauma.
As we all know, nobody ever died from being beaten by a metal stick, and 'cracking skulls' is simply a jocular expression.I'm not saying these things are terribly safe, but it seems that when talking about 'less-than lethal' weapons, most people lose all sense of perspective.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831824</id>
	<title>Re:Permanent damage at 100 meters too...</title>
	<author>atrizu</author>
	<datestamp>1264002600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the big issue here is that some government(s) will no doubt be using this to break up protests or at any time when other less-than-lethal weapons would have been used in the past.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the big issue here is that some government ( s ) will no doubt be using this to break up protests or at any time when other less-than-lethal weapons would have been used in the past .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the big issue here is that some government(s) will no doubt be using this to break up protests or at any time when other less-than-lethal weapons would have been used in the past.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831570</id>
	<title>Blanks can be lethal too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264001460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When pointed in the ear or certain other places, some blanks can cause permanent injury or kill.</p><p>The point is, most less-than-lethal weapons <i>could</i> kill when used improperly.  So treat them with respect, don't use them unless you are trained in their proper use, and don't use them improperly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When pointed in the ear or certain other places , some blanks can cause permanent injury or kill.The point is , most less-than-lethal weapons could kill when used improperly .
So treat them with respect , do n't use them unless you are trained in their proper use , and do n't use them improperly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When pointed in the ear or certain other places, some blanks can cause permanent injury or kill.The point is, most less-than-lethal weapons could kill when used improperly.
So treat them with respect, don't use them unless you are trained in their proper use, and don't use them improperly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832092</id>
	<title>Re:Pacifist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264003800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually we aren't. <strong>They</strong> are spending so much time developing new ways to kill <strong>us</strong>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually we are n't .
They are spending so much time developing new ways to kill us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually we aren't.
They are spending so much time developing new ways to kill us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831482</id>
	<title>It is as a mosquito's whine..</title>
	<author>byrdfl3w</author>
	<datestamp>1264001040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>..compared to my Darth Farts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>..compared to my Darth Farts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..compared to my Darth Farts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835044</id>
	<title>A good reason to re-read and enjoy</title>
	<author>glassware</author>
	<datestamp>1264015080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Calculus Affair.  Absolute classic of the comics genre; one of the best graphic novels ever.  While it's not serious the way Batman: The Dark Knight and Watchmen are, it's a masterpiece of cold war skulduggery and Indiana Jones-style hijinks.  Clearly as influential as some of the best science fiction stories have been.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Calculus\_Affair" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Calculus\_Affair</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Calculus Affair .
Absolute classic of the comics genre ; one of the best graphic novels ever .
While it 's not serious the way Batman : The Dark Knight and Watchmen are , it 's a masterpiece of cold war skulduggery and Indiana Jones-style hijinks .
Clearly as influential as some of the best science fiction stories have been.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The \ _Calculus \ _Affair [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Calculus Affair.
Absolute classic of the comics genre; one of the best graphic novels ever.
While it's not serious the way Batman: The Dark Knight and Watchmen are, it's a masterpiece of cold war skulduggery and Indiana Jones-style hijinks.
Clearly as influential as some of the best science fiction stories have been.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Calculus\_Affair [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831434</id>
	<title>Interesting</title>
	<author>Chrisq</author>
	<datestamp>1264000860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think my friend <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor\_characters\_from\_The\_Hitchhiker's\_Guide\_to\_the\_Galaxy#Hotblack\_Desiato" title="wikipedia.org">Hotblack Desiato</a> [wikipedia.org] could do with a few of these for his rock band.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think my friend Hotblack Desiato [ wikipedia.org ] could do with a few of these for his rock band .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think my friend Hotblack Desiato [wikipedia.org] could do with a few of these for his rock band.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831520
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30840860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831520
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_1241206_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831796
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831570
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833376
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831440
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833146
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833828
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831272
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833720
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832054
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833692
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836734
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835124
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834778
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832480
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831824
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836226
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834370
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834792
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835738
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831640
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832042
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836072
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833928
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835302
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835254
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831836
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831348
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831586
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832198
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833378
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831340
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831528
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833746
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831472
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836620
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835360
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831444
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831520
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834918
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834932
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30840860
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_1241206.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30833724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30831808
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832384
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30834500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30836920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30835276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_1241206.30832092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
