<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_19_2241229</id>
	<title>2-D <em>Avatar</em> To Be Pulled From Theaters In China</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1263897780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>SimonTheSoundMan notes that <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2010/01/avatar-pulled-from-2d-screens-by-chinese-government.html"> <em>Avatar</em> is being pulled from screens in China</a> for being too successful, and too provocative in its anti-authoritarian message. (The 3-D and IMAX versions will remain.) <i>"The communist nation's state-run movie distributor China Film Group is unexpectedly yanking the James Cameron-directed blockbuster <em>Avatar</em> from 1,628 2-D screens this week in favor of a biography of the ancient philosopher Confucius starring Chow-Yun Fat. ... According to a report in the Hong Kong newspaper Apple Daily, the move was made at the urging of propaganda officials who are concerned that <em>Avatar</em> is taking too much market share from Chinese films and drawing unwanted attention to the sensitive issue of forced evictions."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>SimonTheSoundMan notes that Avatar is being pulled from screens in China for being too successful , and too provocative in its anti-authoritarian message .
( The 3-D and IMAX versions will remain .
) " The communist nation 's state-run movie distributor China Film Group is unexpectedly yanking the James Cameron-directed blockbuster Avatar from 1,628 2-D screens this week in favor of a biography of the ancient philosopher Confucius starring Chow-Yun Fat .
... According to a report in the Hong Kong newspaper Apple Daily , the move was made at the urging of propaganda officials who are concerned that Avatar is taking too much market share from Chinese films and drawing unwanted attention to the sensitive issue of forced evictions .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SimonTheSoundMan notes that  Avatar is being pulled from screens in China for being too successful, and too provocative in its anti-authoritarian message.
(The 3-D and IMAX versions will remain.
) "The communist nation's state-run movie distributor China Film Group is unexpectedly yanking the James Cameron-directed blockbuster Avatar from 1,628 2-D screens this week in favor of a biography of the ancient philosopher Confucius starring Chow-Yun Fat.
... According to a report in the Hong Kong newspaper Apple Daily, the move was made at the urging of propaganda officials who are concerned that Avatar is taking too much market share from Chinese films and drawing unwanted attention to the sensitive issue of forced evictions.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828138</id>
	<title>Re:even if Avatar is out of the theaters...</title>
	<author>Jah-Wren Ryel</author>
	<datestamp>1263919920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think what China is defending is national pride, trying to artificially level out the success of foreign vs. domestic films, and preserving the traditional Chinese identity.</p></div><p>Considering the consternation caused by the success of Kung-Fu Panda within China, I think I agree with you:</p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/20/weekinreview/20bernstein.html" title="nytimes.com">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/20/weekinreview/20bernstein.html</a> [nytimes.com]</p><p>The whole idea that they are censoring it for political reasons seems like a story made up for westerners and incongruous with the fact that they left it playing on all those 3D screens.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think what China is defending is national pride , trying to artificially level out the success of foreign vs. domestic films , and preserving the traditional Chinese identity.Considering the consternation caused by the success of Kung-Fu Panda within China , I think I agree with you : http : //www.nytimes.com/2008/07/20/weekinreview/20bernstein.html [ nytimes.com ] The whole idea that they are censoring it for political reasons seems like a story made up for westerners and incongruous with the fact that they left it playing on all those 3D screens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think what China is defending is national pride, trying to artificially level out the success of foreign vs. domestic films, and preserving the traditional Chinese identity.Considering the consternation caused by the success of Kung-Fu Panda within China, I think I agree with you:http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/20/weekinreview/20bernstein.html [nytimes.com]The whole idea that they are censoring it for political reasons seems like a story made up for westerners and incongruous with the fact that they left it playing on all those 3D screens.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826534</id>
	<title>Apple Daily...</title>
	<author>mldqj</author>
	<datestamp>1263905400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wouldn't take anything Apple Daily says too seriously...

The reason that the 2D version is being pulled is that they want to yield the 2D cinemas  to the Confucius movie. If they are pulling it for political reasons, why would they leave the 3D and imax version alone?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't take anything Apple Daily says too seriously.. . The reason that the 2D version is being pulled is that they want to yield the 2D cinemas to the Confucius movie .
If they are pulling it for political reasons , why would they leave the 3D and imax version alone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't take anything Apple Daily says too seriously...

The reason that the 2D version is being pulled is that they want to yield the 2D cinemas  to the Confucius movie.
If they are pulling it for political reasons, why would they leave the 3D and imax version alone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826392</id>
	<title>Cuba vs China</title>
	<author>copponex</author>
	<datestamp>1263904440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cuba is small and within our sphere of influence. Therefore, it can be abused as much as we like, maligned, embargoed, scapegoated, and even invaded. After we tried to turn it into a puppet state, the local population revolted and threw us out. It continues to remain a symbol of successful resistance to American control. (Critics will point to it's economic failures, which have almost everything to do with the results of our desire to crush it.)</p><p>The West tried to the same intervention in China, and the result was the Boxer Rebellion. If China were smaller and closer to the United States, there would be no difference in the way they are treated. Now China has money and a manufacturing sector, so they are "worthy" of being dealt with. So much so that even the hardline nationalists don't dare to insult China and publicly restate their support of a "One China" policy, so when Beijing absorbs Taiwan, America will be able to save some face.</p><p>Decades later we are still somehow surprised by the ferocity of indigenous revolt to foreign rule. Though we can turn to romance when it's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Wind\_That\_Shakes\_the\_Barley" title="wikipedia.org">our ancestors who are doing the revolting.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p><i>Twas hard the woeful words to frame<br>To break the ties that bound us<br>But harder still to bear the shame<br>Of foreign chains around us<br>And so I said, "The mountain glen<br>I'll seek at morning early<br>And join the bold United Men<br>While soft winds shake the barley"</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cuba is small and within our sphere of influence .
Therefore , it can be abused as much as we like , maligned , embargoed , scapegoated , and even invaded .
After we tried to turn it into a puppet state , the local population revolted and threw us out .
It continues to remain a symbol of successful resistance to American control .
( Critics will point to it 's economic failures , which have almost everything to do with the results of our desire to crush it .
) The West tried to the same intervention in China , and the result was the Boxer Rebellion .
If China were smaller and closer to the United States , there would be no difference in the way they are treated .
Now China has money and a manufacturing sector , so they are " worthy " of being dealt with .
So much so that even the hardline nationalists do n't dare to insult China and publicly restate their support of a " One China " policy , so when Beijing absorbs Taiwan , America will be able to save some face.Decades later we are still somehow surprised by the ferocity of indigenous revolt to foreign rule .
Though we can turn to romance when it 's our ancestors who are doing the revolting .
[ wikipedia.org ] T was hard the woeful words to frameTo break the ties that bound usBut harder still to bear the shameOf foreign chains around usAnd so I said , " The mountain glenI 'll seek at morning earlyAnd join the bold United MenWhile soft winds shake the barley "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cuba is small and within our sphere of influence.
Therefore, it can be abused as much as we like, maligned, embargoed, scapegoated, and even invaded.
After we tried to turn it into a puppet state, the local population revolted and threw us out.
It continues to remain a symbol of successful resistance to American control.
(Critics will point to it's economic failures, which have almost everything to do with the results of our desire to crush it.
)The West tried to the same intervention in China, and the result was the Boxer Rebellion.
If China were smaller and closer to the United States, there would be no difference in the way they are treated.
Now China has money and a manufacturing sector, so they are "worthy" of being dealt with.
So much so that even the hardline nationalists don't dare to insult China and publicly restate their support of a "One China" policy, so when Beijing absorbs Taiwan, America will be able to save some face.Decades later we are still somehow surprised by the ferocity of indigenous revolt to foreign rule.
Though we can turn to romance when it's our ancestors who are doing the revolting.
[wikipedia.org]Twas hard the woeful words to frameTo break the ties that bound usBut harder still to bear the shameOf foreign chains around usAnd so I said, "The mountain glenI'll seek at morning earlyAnd join the bold United MenWhile soft winds shake the barley"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827206</id>
	<title>Re:Violating their WTO obligations</title>
	<author>stabiesoft</author>
	<datestamp>1263910620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed, they should have been kicked awhile ago for fixing their exchange rate. Nothing will happen though. The world grows afraid of china.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed , they should have been kicked awhile ago for fixing their exchange rate .
Nothing will happen though .
The world grows afraid of china .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed, they should have been kicked awhile ago for fixing their exchange rate.
Nothing will happen though.
The world grows afraid of china.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827822</id>
	<title>The dumbness of the Chinese Gov't</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1263916620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that ultimately Avatar and films like it side in critique against colonialism.  In other words, the Chinese people would be the good guys, not the marauding dudes [read European powers], and they could use Avatar to discuss for their people some of their own colonial history.  They could say, "Avatar is about... just like how the Mongols took us over, how the British got us all high on Opium, the Americans sailed their gunboats on the Yellow River, the Japanese performed biological experiments on us...", and so forth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that ultimately Avatar and films like it side in critique against colonialism .
In other words , the Chinese people would be the good guys , not the marauding dudes [ read European powers ] , and they could use Avatar to discuss for their people some of their own colonial history .
They could say , " Avatar is about... just like how the Mongols took us over , how the British got us all high on Opium , the Americans sailed their gunboats on the Yellow River , the Japanese performed biological experiments on us... " , and so forth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that ultimately Avatar and films like it side in critique against colonialism.
In other words, the Chinese people would be the good guys, not the marauding dudes [read European powers], and they could use Avatar to discuss for their people some of their own colonial history.
They could say, "Avatar is about... just like how the Mongols took us over, how the British got us all high on Opium, the Americans sailed their gunboats on the Yellow River, the Japanese performed biological experiments on us...", and so forth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828054</id>
	<title>Re:That's about right if your name is Fidel Castro</title>
	<author>copponex</author>
	<datestamp>1263919140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When your government is some crazy military who has remained in power by force for 50 years and has isolated the country from the rest of the world, you don't need foreign enemies to ruin your economy.</p></div><p>Are you talking about Cuba or America?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When your government is some crazy military who has remained in power by force for 50 years and has isolated the country from the rest of the world , you do n't need foreign enemies to ruin your economy.Are you talking about Cuba or America ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When your government is some crazy military who has remained in power by force for 50 years and has isolated the country from the rest of the world, you don't need foreign enemies to ruin your economy.Are you talking about Cuba or America?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30830410</id>
	<title>Re:Avatar was a mash-up movie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263991860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like the name:<br>"Dance with Thundercats".</p><p>I read it from someone here in slashdot but do not have the source link unfortunately.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the name : " Dance with Thundercats " .I read it from someone here in slashdot but do not have the source link unfortunately .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the name:"Dance with Thundercats".I read it from someone here in slashdot but do not have the source link unfortunately.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827468</id>
	<title>LOL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263912960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"It continues to remain a symbol of successful resistance to American control"</p><p>If that's a successful symbol, what does an unsuccessful symbol look like? Hawaii?</p><p>The Cuban people live like cavemen in falling down cities, with all personal wealth stripped away, where you disappear if you have a cell phone or TV that isn't approved, where "knowing too much" isn't a joke, it's a crime.</p><p>Seems to me they can brag about something theoretical, while people are starving, you're not allowed to express yourself, and people will do anything to get away, but of course, it's illegal to leave.</p><p>Just kidding of course.  We all know that Cuba is the worker's paradise, where all are equal.  I'll bet the people are sure glad they showed the United States who's in charge.  Hooray for them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" It continues to remain a symbol of successful resistance to American control " If that 's a successful symbol , what does an unsuccessful symbol look like ?
Hawaii ? The Cuban people live like cavemen in falling down cities , with all personal wealth stripped away , where you disappear if you have a cell phone or TV that is n't approved , where " knowing too much " is n't a joke , it 's a crime.Seems to me they can brag about something theoretical , while people are starving , you 're not allowed to express yourself , and people will do anything to get away , but of course , it 's illegal to leave.Just kidding of course .
We all know that Cuba is the worker 's paradise , where all are equal .
I 'll bet the people are sure glad they showed the United States who 's in charge .
Hooray for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It continues to remain a symbol of successful resistance to American control"If that's a successful symbol, what does an unsuccessful symbol look like?
Hawaii?The Cuban people live like cavemen in falling down cities, with all personal wealth stripped away, where you disappear if you have a cell phone or TV that isn't approved, where "knowing too much" isn't a joke, it's a crime.Seems to me they can brag about something theoretical, while people are starving, you're not allowed to express yourself, and people will do anything to get away, but of course, it's illegal to leave.Just kidding of course.
We all know that Cuba is the worker's paradise, where all are equal.
I'll bet the people are sure glad they showed the United States who's in charge.
Hooray for them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829398</id>
	<title>Here, watch it all you want for free</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263979860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.33md.com/movie\_2009/html/e1b46055dff2c39c.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.33md.com/movie \ _2009/html/e1b46055dff2c39c.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.33md.com/movie\_2009/html/e1b46055dff2c39c.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827902</id>
	<title>Don't get distracted with the 'America Sucks' BS.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263917640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's really quite simple what this is about:</p><p>"... The move was made at the urging of propaganda officials who are concerned that 'Avatar' is taking too much market share from Chinese films..."</p><p>So does anyone ever make a thread about the dynamic world economy? Is there a single peep about how many Chinese have been lifted out of poverty because of capitalism? Yes, but it's always the trashy negative comments that hate America that get +5 insightful. Slashdot has definitely gone to the (commie) dogs.</p><p>Every once in a while, I visit this site out of curiosity just to see what flavor of ideological nutcase is currently using the forums for a psychiatric outlet. I've stopped wondering why there are so many posts that hate on the USA. Just because your fucking country sucks doesn't mean that the USA is the cause. Have fun masturbating.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's really quite simple what this is about : " ... The move was made at the urging of propaganda officials who are concerned that 'Avatar ' is taking too much market share from Chinese films... " So does anyone ever make a thread about the dynamic world economy ?
Is there a single peep about how many Chinese have been lifted out of poverty because of capitalism ?
Yes , but it 's always the trashy negative comments that hate America that get + 5 insightful .
Slashdot has definitely gone to the ( commie ) dogs.Every once in a while , I visit this site out of curiosity just to see what flavor of ideological nutcase is currently using the forums for a psychiatric outlet .
I 've stopped wondering why there are so many posts that hate on the USA .
Just because your fucking country sucks does n't mean that the USA is the cause .
Have fun masturbating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's really quite simple what this is about:"... The move was made at the urging of propaganda officials who are concerned that 'Avatar' is taking too much market share from Chinese films..."So does anyone ever make a thread about the dynamic world economy?
Is there a single peep about how many Chinese have been lifted out of poverty because of capitalism?
Yes, but it's always the trashy negative comments that hate America that get +5 insightful.
Slashdot has definitely gone to the (commie) dogs.Every once in a while, I visit this site out of curiosity just to see what flavor of ideological nutcase is currently using the forums for a psychiatric outlet.
I've stopped wondering why there are so many posts that hate on the USA.
Just because your fucking country sucks doesn't mean that the USA is the cause.
Have fun masturbating.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825990</id>
	<title>Can they handle it?</title>
	<author>shippers</author>
	<datestamp>1263902160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At first I had thought they had done this to prevent any further <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/19/avatar\_death/" title="theregister.co.uk" rel="nofollow">deaths</a> [theregister.co.uk] from overexcitable patrons, but they've gone and left the 3D version wide open - risky!</htmltext>
<tokenext>At first I had thought they had done this to prevent any further deaths [ theregister.co.uk ] from overexcitable patrons , but they 've gone and left the 3D version wide open - risky !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At first I had thought they had done this to prevent any further deaths [theregister.co.uk] from overexcitable patrons, but they've gone and left the 3D version wide open - risky!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828396</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>asaz989</author>
	<datestamp>1263922260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Chinese government is sensitive about Avatar not because of its Western resonances, but because of specific plot points that are important in the Chinese context: mainly, the idea of natives driven off the land by arbitrary fiat in favor of corporate development. It's a common practice in China these days, and probably one of the biggest issues that causes open dissent in China (actual people-on-the-street protests and legal campaigns against government decisions, not just publishing stuff the Party doesn't like)</p><p>And now on to wild speculation: my guess is, they pulled it from 2D and not 3D because the kind of people who have actually lost their land to government-backed development schemes are poor peasants (or newly-minted migrant workers) who aren't going to spend the extra money on fancy 3D movies. To the urban middle class that'll pay extra for the 3D experience, this movie's plot is just as meaningless as it is to an American or European.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Chinese government is sensitive about Avatar not because of its Western resonances , but because of specific plot points that are important in the Chinese context : mainly , the idea of natives driven off the land by arbitrary fiat in favor of corporate development .
It 's a common practice in China these days , and probably one of the biggest issues that causes open dissent in China ( actual people-on-the-street protests and legal campaigns against government decisions , not just publishing stuff the Party does n't like ) And now on to wild speculation : my guess is , they pulled it from 2D and not 3D because the kind of people who have actually lost their land to government-backed development schemes are poor peasants ( or newly-minted migrant workers ) who are n't going to spend the extra money on fancy 3D movies .
To the urban middle class that 'll pay extra for the 3D experience , this movie 's plot is just as meaningless as it is to an American or European .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Chinese government is sensitive about Avatar not because of its Western resonances, but because of specific plot points that are important in the Chinese context: mainly, the idea of natives driven off the land by arbitrary fiat in favor of corporate development.
It's a common practice in China these days, and probably one of the biggest issues that causes open dissent in China (actual people-on-the-street protests and legal campaigns against government decisions, not just publishing stuff the Party doesn't like)And now on to wild speculation: my guess is, they pulled it from 2D and not 3D because the kind of people who have actually lost their land to government-backed development schemes are poor peasants (or newly-minted migrant workers) who aren't going to spend the extra money on fancy 3D movies.
To the urban middle class that'll pay extra for the 3D experience, this movie's plot is just as meaningless as it is to an American or European.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826036</id>
	<title>Actually</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1263902460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought Avatar was about the people triumphing over big business. You'd think that would go down well in supposedly communist China.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought Avatar was about the people triumphing over big business .
You 'd think that would go down well in supposedly communist China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought Avatar was about the people triumphing over big business.
You'd think that would go down well in supposedly communist China.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827952</id>
	<title>Re:WTF???</title>
	<author>Haoie</author>
	<datestamp>1263918300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't recall Confucius talking like Yoda either, but, here we are with jokes about him.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't recall Confucius talking like Yoda either , but , here we are with jokes about him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't recall Confucius talking like Yoda either, but, here we are with jokes about him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30830318</id>
	<title>Re:Violating their WTO obligations</title>
	<author>consonant</author>
	<datestamp>1263990840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right.</p><p>Now who will bell the Chinese cat?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right.Now who will bell the Chinese cat ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right.Now who will bell the Chinese cat?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825948</id>
	<title>Re:The link is broken</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263901980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not only that, but even if you fix the double h and put the requisite slashes after the colon, you get <a href="http://latimesblogslatimescomentertainmentnewsbuzz201001avatar-pulled-from-2d-screens-by-chinese-governmenthtml/" title="latimesblo...rnmenthtml">this</a> [latimesblo...rnmenthtml] [warning, link doesn't work]. So you think, "oh I see, they forgot to put the dot in between 'government' and 'html'!" It is then that you realize the url has no slashes or periods at all.
<br> <br>
For everyone's hilarious enjoyment, here is the full text of the broken url<blockquote><div><p>hhttp:latimesblogslatimescomentertainmentnewsbuzz201001avatar-pulled-from-2d-screens-by-chinese-governmenthtml</p></div>
</blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only that , but even if you fix the double h and put the requisite slashes after the colon , you get this [ latimesblo...rnmenthtml ] [ warning , link does n't work ] .
So you think , " oh I see , they forgot to put the dot in between 'government ' and 'html ' !
" It is then that you realize the url has no slashes or periods at all .
For everyone 's hilarious enjoyment , here is the full text of the broken urlhhttp : latimesblogslatimescomentertainmentnewsbuzz201001avatar-pulled-from-2d-screens-by-chinese-governmenthtml</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only that, but even if you fix the double h and put the requisite slashes after the colon, you get this [latimesblo...rnmenthtml] [warning, link doesn't work].
So you think, "oh I see, they forgot to put the dot in between 'government' and 'html'!
" It is then that you realize the url has no slashes or periods at all.
For everyone's hilarious enjoyment, here is the full text of the broken urlhhttp:latimesblogslatimescomentertainmentnewsbuzz201001avatar-pulled-from-2d-screens-by-chinese-governmenthtml

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826202</id>
	<title>Re:WTF???</title>
	<author>PeanutButterBreath</author>
	<datestamp>1263903360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chow Yun Fat is turning 55 this year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chow Yun Fat is turning 55 this year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chow Yun Fat is turning 55 this year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828104</id>
	<title>Re:Violating their WTO obligations</title>
	<author>vxice</author>
	<datestamp>1263919620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Problem is we want 10 tube socks for a dollar more than they want our movies.  Common problem in international relations, who wants it more.  Would you be willing to be unable to borrow any money because China has stopped lending and at the same time face increased prices because they wont export to us?  Admittedly we are pretty even on the balance of power but if China wants to hurt us it will only hurt them slightly less.  That wont be the case in the near future and what they have been working for for a long time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Problem is we want 10 tube socks for a dollar more than they want our movies .
Common problem in international relations , who wants it more .
Would you be willing to be unable to borrow any money because China has stopped lending and at the same time face increased prices because they wont export to us ?
Admittedly we are pretty even on the balance of power but if China wants to hurt us it will only hurt them slightly less .
That wont be the case in the near future and what they have been working for for a long time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Problem is we want 10 tube socks for a dollar more than they want our movies.
Common problem in international relations, who wants it more.
Would you be willing to be unable to borrow any money because China has stopped lending and at the same time face increased prices because they wont export to us?
Admittedly we are pretty even on the balance of power but if China wants to hurt us it will only hurt them slightly less.
That wont be the case in the near future and what they have been working for for a long time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30830448</id>
	<title>Re:Cuba vs China</title>
	<author>emilper</author>
	<datestamp>1263992280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>After we tried to turn it into a puppet state, the local population revolted and threw us out.</p></div><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... as far as I remember, after throwing Batista out the revolutionaries tried very hard to ingratiate themselves with US, and accepted help from SU only after Bay of Pigs<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... here  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Arrogance-Power-J-William-Fulbright/dp/0812992628" title="amazon.com">http://www.amazon.com/Arrogance-Power-J-William-Fulbright/dp/0812992628</a> [amazon.com]  the story is well put</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The West tried to the same intervention in China, and the result was the Boxer Rebellion.</p></div><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... the West got deep into China only after the Boxers besieged the embassies. Before that it was only a matter of China taxing European imports so hard that only opium found a market, while Europe was dealing with a huge trade deficit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>After we tried to turn it into a puppet state , the local population revolted and threw us out .
... as far as I remember , after throwing Batista out the revolutionaries tried very hard to ingratiate themselves with US , and accepted help from SU only after Bay of Pigs ... here http : //www.amazon.com/Arrogance-Power-J-William-Fulbright/dp/0812992628 [ amazon.com ] the story is well putThe West tried to the same intervention in China , and the result was the Boxer Rebellion .
... the West got deep into China only after the Boxers besieged the embassies .
Before that it was only a matter of China taxing European imports so hard that only opium found a market , while Europe was dealing with a huge trade deficit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After we tried to turn it into a puppet state, the local population revolted and threw us out.
... as far as I remember, after throwing Batista out the revolutionaries tried very hard to ingratiate themselves with US, and accepted help from SU only after Bay of Pigs ... here  http://www.amazon.com/Arrogance-Power-J-William-Fulbright/dp/0812992628 [amazon.com]  the story is well putThe West tried to the same intervention in China, and the result was the Boxer Rebellion.
... the West got deep into China only after the Boxers besieged the embassies.
Before that it was only a matter of China taxing European imports so hard that only opium found a market, while Europe was dealing with a huge trade deficit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30830952</id>
	<title>Again with those guys</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1263998040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Chinese government really knows how to irk the rest of the world. Yes, don't go see the movie avatar, and force a revolution, or better yet, force all your population to immigrate out of your stupid country just to be able to say they saw Avatar, that should do the trick! I know nothing about running a country, and base whatever opinions I have from Canada, and the US, maybe even a lot of Europe as being the best way to run a country, but omg, if I was Chinese, and had my cousin telling me he watched Avatar and was one of the best movies ever, and then the government pulled this sh*t, it definitely would be an eye opener for me, as to what my country really represents on censorship. I swear I would immigrate after hearing this, maybe all Chinese needing to see this movie should to!</p><p>Good luck to all Chinese people who want to see the movie,<br>cuz you ain't getting the same effect without the glasses, and with someone using a camcorder to pirate this movie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Chinese government really knows how to irk the rest of the world .
Yes , do n't go see the movie avatar , and force a revolution , or better yet , force all your population to immigrate out of your stupid country just to be able to say they saw Avatar , that should do the trick !
I know nothing about running a country , and base whatever opinions I have from Canada , and the US , maybe even a lot of Europe as being the best way to run a country , but omg , if I was Chinese , and had my cousin telling me he watched Avatar and was one of the best movies ever , and then the government pulled this sh * t , it definitely would be an eye opener for me , as to what my country really represents on censorship .
I swear I would immigrate after hearing this , maybe all Chinese needing to see this movie should to ! Good luck to all Chinese people who want to see the movie,cuz you ai n't getting the same effect without the glasses , and with someone using a camcorder to pirate this movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Chinese government really knows how to irk the rest of the world.
Yes, don't go see the movie avatar, and force a revolution, or better yet, force all your population to immigrate out of your stupid country just to be able to say they saw Avatar, that should do the trick!
I know nothing about running a country, and base whatever opinions I have from Canada, and the US, maybe even a lot of Europe as being the best way to run a country, but omg, if I was Chinese, and had my cousin telling me he watched Avatar and was one of the best movies ever, and then the government pulled this sh*t, it definitely would be an eye opener for me, as to what my country really represents on censorship.
I swear I would immigrate after hearing this, maybe all Chinese needing to see this movie should to!Good luck to all Chinese people who want to see the movie,cuz you ain't getting the same effect without the glasses, and with someone using a camcorder to pirate this movie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826644</id>
	<title>No, it's perfectly logical</title>
	<author>Weezul</author>
	<datestamp>1263906120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>China has almost 1 billion peasants.  Peasants are poor simple traditional people who live relatively close to nature.  Peasants are also the people whom governments uproot for resource extraction.  Sound vaguely like any movies you've seen recently?  Good.  So now China's 900 screens running the 3D version are located where exactly?  I thought so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>China has almost 1 billion peasants .
Peasants are poor simple traditional people who live relatively close to nature .
Peasants are also the people whom governments uproot for resource extraction .
Sound vaguely like any movies you 've seen recently ?
Good. So now China 's 900 screens running the 3D version are located where exactly ?
I thought so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>China has almost 1 billion peasants.
Peasants are poor simple traditional people who live relatively close to nature.
Peasants are also the people whom governments uproot for resource extraction.
Sound vaguely like any movies you've seen recently?
Good.  So now China's 900 screens running the 3D version are located where exactly?
I thought so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826022</id>
	<title>As a 49 year old feminist grandmother</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263902340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I once read HG Wells write an interesting explanation of why the chinese are losers who generally steal rather than invent. You see it all comes down to their very complicated language/alphabet, takes kids forever to learn, not good for doing work with, so young people spend too much of their time mastering it and then it's not so practical for business or science even once they master it. Therefore with little ability to innovate they become giant photocopyers and steal the work of the grigori perelmans of the world etc. Having said that the dalai lamer is no better, running a corrupt fiefdom forever and enjoying the slaves... suddenly becomes a man of peace once he gets booted and has no power left, where were your peaceful intentions when you lacked any concern for your slaves fuelling your life of luxuRy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I once read HG Wells write an interesting explanation of why the chinese are losers who generally steal rather than invent .
You see it all comes down to their very complicated language/alphabet , takes kids forever to learn , not good for doing work with , so young people spend too much of their time mastering it and then it 's not so practical for business or science even once they master it .
Therefore with little ability to innovate they become giant photocopyers and steal the work of the grigori perelmans of the world etc .
Having said that the dalai lamer is no better , running a corrupt fiefdom forever and enjoying the slaves... suddenly becomes a man of peace once he gets booted and has no power left , where were your peaceful intentions when you lacked any concern for your slaves fuelling your life of luxuRy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I once read HG Wells write an interesting explanation of why the chinese are losers who generally steal rather than invent.
You see it all comes down to their very complicated language/alphabet, takes kids forever to learn, not good for doing work with, so young people spend too much of their time mastering it and then it's not so practical for business or science even once they master it.
Therefore with little ability to innovate they become giant photocopyers and steal the work of the grigori perelmans of the world etc.
Having said that the dalai lamer is no better, running a corrupt fiefdom forever and enjoying the slaves... suddenly becomes a man of peace once he gets booted and has no power left, where were your peaceful intentions when you lacked any concern for your slaves fuelling your life of luxuRy?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826580</id>
	<title>Fun fact</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263905700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Avatar, Pandora's atmosphere is deadly to humans due to the presence of hydrogen sulfide gas. That's the same stuff that in real life has been found to be emitted by Chinese-made drywall.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Avatar , Pandora 's atmosphere is deadly to humans due to the presence of hydrogen sulfide gas .
That 's the same stuff that in real life has been found to be emitted by Chinese-made drywall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Avatar, Pandora's atmosphere is deadly to humans due to the presence of hydrogen sulfide gas.
That's the same stuff that in real life has been found to be emitted by Chinese-made drywall.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829346</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>codeButcher</author>
	<datestamp>1263978900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I was more puzzled by how a race of hunter/gatherers have absolutely perfect teeth to a person</p></div></blockquote><p>Because they where CGI generated?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was more puzzled by how a race of hunter/gatherers have absolutely perfect teeth to a personBecause they where CGI generated ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was more puzzled by how a race of hunter/gatherers have absolutely perfect teeth to a personBecause they where CGI generated?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828174</id>
	<title>"Anonymous Coward."</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263920340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is this a tech news????</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this a tech news ? ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this a tech news???
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827820</id>
	<title>Re:Violating their WTO obligations --- WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263916560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear American geek,</p><p>American courts and tribunals have held on many occasions that your country has violated WTO and other treaties in regards to softwood lumber from Canada. Please return the money or perhaps urge your government to drop out of the WTO.</p><p>Yours in Stunned Silliness,</p><p>A Canadian</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear American geek,American courts and tribunals have held on many occasions that your country has violated WTO and other treaties in regards to softwood lumber from Canada .
Please return the money or perhaps urge your government to drop out of the WTO.Yours in Stunned Silliness,A Canadian</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear American geek,American courts and tribunals have held on many occasions that your country has violated WTO and other treaties in regards to softwood lumber from Canada.
Please return the money or perhaps urge your government to drop out of the WTO.Yours in Stunned Silliness,A Canadian</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826484</id>
	<title>demand and supply</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263904920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>basic economics<br>1 Avatar 2D only accounts for 1/3 of revenue for Avatar in China<br>2. a lot fo demand for imax and 3D edition which greatly suppressed the demand for 2D<br>3. China film group's next big film Confucius is to be released to theater.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>basic economics1 Avatar 2D only accounts for 1/3 of revenue for Avatar in China2 .
a lot fo demand for imax and 3D edition which greatly suppressed the demand for 2D3 .
China film group 's next big film Confucius is to be released to theater .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>basic economics1 Avatar 2D only accounts for 1/3 of revenue for Avatar in China2.
a lot fo demand for imax and 3D edition which greatly suppressed the demand for 2D3.
China film group's next big film Confucius is to be released to theater.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827266</id>
	<title>Re:Cuban economics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263911100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Say what you will of "economic failure", they have become extremely successful at being self-sustaining and keeping their people's basic needs met. I recommend watching this documentary: http://www.cbc.ca/natureofthings/show\_cuba.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Say what you will of " economic failure " , they have become extremely successful at being self-sustaining and keeping their people 's basic needs met .
I recommend watching this documentary : http : //www.cbc.ca/natureofthings/show \ _cuba.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Say what you will of "economic failure", they have become extremely successful at being self-sustaining and keeping their people's basic needs met.
I recommend watching this documentary: http://www.cbc.ca/natureofthings/show\_cuba.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825852</id>
	<title>The link is broken</title>
	<author>Useful Wheat</author>
	<datestamp>1263901560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your link is broken. You added an extra h to the front. Potentially for hyperbole? I don't know, I'm not a computer geek.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your link is broken .
You added an extra h to the front .
Potentially for hyperbole ?
I do n't know , I 'm not a computer geek .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your link is broken.
You added an extra h to the front.
Potentially for hyperbole?
I don't know, I'm not a computer geek.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826080</id>
	<title>3D version</title>
	<author>jolyonr</author>
	<datestamp>1263902700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"In a follow-up statement, the China Film Group explained that they could not ban the 3D version of Avatar because it was 'too fucking awesome'. They also explained that they were re-shooting the Biopic of Confucious in 3D, and in this 3D version, Chow Yun Fat plays the title role as a 12-foot smurf."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" In a follow-up statement , the China Film Group explained that they could not ban the 3D version of Avatar because it was 'too fucking awesome' .
They also explained that they were re-shooting the Biopic of Confucious in 3D , and in this 3D version , Chow Yun Fat plays the title role as a 12-foot smurf .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"In a follow-up statement, the China Film Group explained that they could not ban the 3D version of Avatar because it was 'too fucking awesome'.
They also explained that they were re-shooting the Biopic of Confucious in 3D, and in this 3D version, Chow Yun Fat plays the title role as a 12-foot smurf.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826498</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1263905100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is a bit more nuanced than that: no one is thinking that Avatar hates China, the fact is, as a side theme, Avatar features forced eviction.  It wasn't Cameron's primary idea to attack eminent domain, but a lot of Chinese have latched onto it because eminent domain is a serious problem in China right now.  The government has forced a lot of people to move, because of all the development that's been going on. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nail\_house#Examples" title="wikipedia.org">Here is a picture</a> [wikipedia.org] of one awesome example.<br> <br>
Because most of the people are opposed to developer's actions in such cases, it has created a rift between the government and the people.  The government has required all news organizations to stop reporting on eminent domain cases, and now here is a movie that features forced eviction, and shows how to fight against it.  People in China have latched on to that theme.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a bit more nuanced than that : no one is thinking that Avatar hates China , the fact is , as a side theme , Avatar features forced eviction .
It was n't Cameron 's primary idea to attack eminent domain , but a lot of Chinese have latched onto it because eminent domain is a serious problem in China right now .
The government has forced a lot of people to move , because of all the development that 's been going on .
Here is a picture [ wikipedia.org ] of one awesome example .
Because most of the people are opposed to developer 's actions in such cases , it has created a rift between the government and the people .
The government has required all news organizations to stop reporting on eminent domain cases , and now here is a movie that features forced eviction , and shows how to fight against it .
People in China have latched on to that theme .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a bit more nuanced than that: no one is thinking that Avatar hates China, the fact is, as a side theme, Avatar features forced eviction.
It wasn't Cameron's primary idea to attack eminent domain, but a lot of Chinese have latched onto it because eminent domain is a serious problem in China right now.
The government has forced a lot of people to move, because of all the development that's been going on.
Here is a picture [wikipedia.org] of one awesome example.
Because most of the people are opposed to developer's actions in such cases, it has created a rift between the government and the people.
The government has required all news organizations to stop reporting on eminent domain cases, and now here is a movie that features forced eviction, and shows how to fight against it.
People in China have latched on to that theme.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827032</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>TriCCer</author>
	<datestamp>1263909120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Around the turn of the 20th century, Dr Weston A. Price, a dentist, found indgenous peoples who avoided unrefined foods to
have much better dental health than city dwellers.</p></div><p>You mean \_avoided REFINED foods\_ right?

If not, I really want to meet up with the sugar cane tribes. I KNEW mommy was lying!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Around the turn of the 20th century , Dr Weston A. Price , a dentist , found indgenous peoples who avoided unrefined foods to have much better dental health than city dwellers.You mean \ _avoided REFINED foods \ _ right ?
If not , I really want to meet up with the sugar cane tribes .
I KNEW mommy was lying !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Around the turn of the 20th century, Dr Weston A. Price, a dentist, found indgenous peoples who avoided unrefined foods to
have much better dental health than city dwellers.You mean \_avoided REFINED foods\_ right?
If not, I really want to meet up with the sugar cane tribes.
I KNEW mommy was lying!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826464</id>
	<title>Re:Error</title>
	<author>KalAl</author>
	<datestamp>1263904860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Use the Preview Button !
Check those URLs !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Use the Preview Button!
Check those URLs!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829476</id>
	<title>Re:Apple Daily...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263980700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imax doesn't work with chinese eyes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imax does n't work with chinese eyes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imax doesn't work with chinese eyes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827046</id>
	<title>Now the domestic naysayers can only feel ashamed</title>
	<author>Asterra</author>
	<datestamp>1263909180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The folks in the US who lambasted the movie for its alleged denunciation of the authoritarian Bush administration must be placing foot soundly in mouth right about now.  It's bad when the only ones who agree with you are the Chinese government, because it also means that the alleged denunciation in question was very much deserved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The folks in the US who lambasted the movie for its alleged denunciation of the authoritarian Bush administration must be placing foot soundly in mouth right about now .
It 's bad when the only ones who agree with you are the Chinese government , because it also means that the alleged denunciation in question was very much deserved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The folks in the US who lambasted the movie for its alleged denunciation of the authoritarian Bush administration must be placing foot soundly in mouth right about now.
It's bad when the only ones who agree with you are the Chinese government, because it also means that the alleged denunciation in question was very much deserved.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826238</id>
	<title>Re:WTF???</title>
	<author>Romberg</author>
	<datestamp>1263903480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A reboot of Confucius would be so fucking awesome that way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A reboot of Confucius would be so fucking awesome that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A reboot of Confucius would be so fucking awesome that way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827144</id>
	<title>Speaking of Science Fiction Stories....</title>
	<author>Stormy Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1263909960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Weston Price also "found" that sugar causes tuberculosis and that root canals cause cancer.

Please spare Dr. Price and his homeopathic dentistry crap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Weston Price also " found " that sugar causes tuberculosis and that root canals cause cancer .
Please spare Dr. Price and his homeopathic dentistry crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weston Price also "found" that sugar causes tuberculosis and that root canals cause cancer.
Please spare Dr. Price and his homeopathic dentistry crap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828280</id>
	<title>Re:Error</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263921240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I happen to subscribe to Apple Daily.  The news article also say that the 3D version will probably be only shown three to four weeks.  Here's the Google translate of the last paragraph of the news article:</p><p>"The mainland in recent years, made the tragedy of forced relocation continue to brew, the residents from time to time self-immolation or self-mutilation, etc. in order to protest. An Internet user refers to "Avatar," the director must have lived in China, inspired by the demolitions of forced removals of Chinese society, "the only difference is that there is hope for ending the film, while Chinese demolished resident are hopeless. " Internet users said: ""Avatar "is to commemorate the forced removal of the nail house resident."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I happen to subscribe to Apple Daily .
The news article also say that the 3D version will probably be only shown three to four weeks .
Here 's the Google translate of the last paragraph of the news article : " The mainland in recent years , made the tragedy of forced relocation continue to brew , the residents from time to time self-immolation or self-mutilation , etc .
in order to protest .
An Internet user refers to " Avatar , " the director must have lived in China , inspired by the demolitions of forced removals of Chinese society , " the only difference is that there is hope for ending the film , while Chinese demolished resident are hopeless .
" Internet users said : " " Avatar " is to commemorate the forced removal of the nail house resident .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I happen to subscribe to Apple Daily.
The news article also say that the 3D version will probably be only shown three to four weeks.
Here's the Google translate of the last paragraph of the news article:"The mainland in recent years, made the tragedy of forced relocation continue to brew, the residents from time to time self-immolation or self-mutilation, etc.
in order to protest.
An Internet user refers to "Avatar," the director must have lived in China, inspired by the demolitions of forced removals of Chinese society, "the only difference is that there is hope for ending the film, while Chinese demolished resident are hopeless.
" Internet users said: ""Avatar "is to commemorate the forced removal of the nail house resident.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826608</id>
	<title>Re:WTF???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263905820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Chow Yun Fat is turning 55 this year.</p></div>

</blockquote><p>I remember when I saw "The Replacement Killers", all the college girls on the front row were practically (or perhaps actually) drooling over Chow-Yun Fat.  Now, I realize that was 12 years ago.</p><p>
I guess what I'm trying to say is, get off my lawn!!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chow Yun Fat is turning 55 this year .
I remember when I saw " The Replacement Killers " , all the college girls on the front row were practically ( or perhaps actually ) drooling over Chow-Yun Fat .
Now , I realize that was 12 years ago .
I guess what I 'm trying to say is , get off my lawn ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chow Yun Fat is turning 55 this year.
I remember when I saw "The Replacement Killers", all the college girls on the front row were practically (or perhaps actually) drooling over Chow-Yun Fat.
Now, I realize that was 12 years ago.
I guess what I'm trying to say is, get off my lawn!!
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30830198</id>
	<title>Oops...</title>
	<author>gaelfx</author>
	<datestamp>1263989640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...I accidentally tried to submit this story long after this one was posted. The article in the China Daily is here: <a href="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-01/20/content\_9345465.htm" title="chinadaily.com.cn" rel="nofollow">http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-01/20/content\_9345465.htm</a> [chinadaily.com.cn]

But I come here in hopes of enlightening some people about the situation. After I read the article in the CD, I tried to go to imdb.com (an unrelated incident) but the connection was reset, which is a common sign that a website has been blocked by the big ol' government. I was able to confirm this by IMing some friends out of country. Now, I don't know how long it has been blocked because I can't remember the last time I was able to use it, but it seems it wasn't so long ago. I leave it to you conspiracy nuts out there (read: fellow slashdotters) to speculate on that particular revelation.

P.S. I will try to post more information regarding the blocking as soon as I can. Don't hold your breath.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I accidentally tried to submit this story long after this one was posted .
The article in the China Daily is here : http : //www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-01/20/content \ _9345465.htm [ chinadaily.com.cn ] But I come here in hopes of enlightening some people about the situation .
After I read the article in the CD , I tried to go to imdb.com ( an unrelated incident ) but the connection was reset , which is a common sign that a website has been blocked by the big ol ' government .
I was able to confirm this by IMing some friends out of country .
Now , I do n't know how long it has been blocked because I ca n't remember the last time I was able to use it , but it seems it was n't so long ago .
I leave it to you conspiracy nuts out there ( read : fellow slashdotters ) to speculate on that particular revelation .
P.S. I will try to post more information regarding the blocking as soon as I can .
Do n't hold your breath .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I accidentally tried to submit this story long after this one was posted.
The article in the China Daily is here: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-01/20/content\_9345465.htm [chinadaily.com.cn]

But I come here in hopes of enlightening some people about the situation.
After I read the article in the CD, I tried to go to imdb.com (an unrelated incident) but the connection was reset, which is a common sign that a website has been blocked by the big ol' government.
I was able to confirm this by IMing some friends out of country.
Now, I don't know how long it has been blocked because I can't remember the last time I was able to use it, but it seems it wasn't so long ago.
I leave it to you conspiracy nuts out there (read: fellow slashdotters) to speculate on that particular revelation.
P.S. I will try to post more information regarding the blocking as soon as I can.
Don't hold your breath.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826278</id>
	<title>Re:even if Avatar is out of the theaters...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263903780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually the Chinese are prospecting for oil in Cuba at the moment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually the Chinese are prospecting for oil in Cuba at the moment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually the Chinese are prospecting for oil in Cuba at the moment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825972</id>
	<title>In Soviet China</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263902100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Theaters pulls YOU !</p><p>Yours In Voronezh,<br>K. Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Theaters pulls YOU ! Yours In Voronezh,K .
Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Theaters pulls YOU !Yours In Voronezh,K.
Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828242</id>
	<title>Re:Avatar was a mash-up movie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263921060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd disagree.  I'm reminded of Harry Harrison's "Deathworld", which has a similar plot.  However, borrowed from is perfectly OK, as one can always say a work has some traits of another.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd disagree .
I 'm reminded of Harry Harrison 's " Deathworld " , which has a similar plot .
However , borrowed from is perfectly OK , as one can always say a work has some traits of another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd disagree.
I'm reminded of Harry Harrison's "Deathworld", which has a similar plot.
However, borrowed from is perfectly OK, as one can always say a work has some traits of another.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828650</id>
	<title>yellow journalism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263924960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The original article doesn't quite say what this title suggest--CENSORSHIP.  Especially if 900 3D screens remain.  Unfortunately, this post appears to be more yellow journalism than journalism--making news instead of reporting them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The original article does n't quite say what this title suggest--CENSORSHIP .
Especially if 900 3D screens remain .
Unfortunately , this post appears to be more yellow journalism than journalism--making news instead of reporting them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The original article doesn't quite say what this title suggest--CENSORSHIP.
Especially if 900 3D screens remain.
Unfortunately, this post appears to be more yellow journalism than journalism--making news instead of reporting them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826544</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1263905460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't think anyone was suggesting that Avatar symbolized hatred for any nation.</p></div><p>I think you'll find that there were and are people suggesting exactly that. Hell, even the Vatican made a crazy public statement (although it was not about hating a particular nation, but rather about not endorsing the correct religious model).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think anyone was suggesting that Avatar symbolized hatred for any nation.I think you 'll find that there were and are people suggesting exactly that .
Hell , even the Vatican made a crazy public statement ( although it was not about hating a particular nation , but rather about not endorsing the correct religious model ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think anyone was suggesting that Avatar symbolized hatred for any nation.I think you'll find that there were and are people suggesting exactly that.
Hell, even the Vatican made a crazy public statement (although it was not about hating a particular nation, but rather about not endorsing the correct religious model).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826154</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826420</id>
	<title>Mercantilism</title>
	<author>thule</author>
	<datestamp>1263904620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems to me that Avatar is a pretty straightforward telling of why mercantilism never really works out like it is supposed to.  It takes huge amount of resources for a nation to occupy another nation and subdue it so that it can plunder the resources.  </p><p>You would think people would know this story pretty well by now, but then again, people still fall for Marxism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to me that Avatar is a pretty straightforward telling of why mercantilism never really works out like it is supposed to .
It takes huge amount of resources for a nation to occupy another nation and subdue it so that it can plunder the resources .
You would think people would know this story pretty well by now , but then again , people still fall for Marxism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to me that Avatar is a pretty straightforward telling of why mercantilism never really works out like it is supposed to.
It takes huge amount of resources for a nation to occupy another nation and subdue it so that it can plunder the resources.
You would think people would know this story pretty well by now, but then again, people still fall for Marxism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827056</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1263909240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Avatar is a fairly simplistic (but very well animated) tale of the good guys and the bad guys. Even if the direction hadn't been so heavy handed, the good guys would have been obviously in the right and the bad guys obviously in the wrong.</p></div><p>Yes, it was just a little shy of a really subtle plot where the good guys were obviously good and the bad guys were obviously bad.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Avatar is a fairly simplistic ( but very well animated ) tale of the good guys and the bad guys .
Even if the direction had n't been so heavy handed , the good guys would have been obviously in the right and the bad guys obviously in the wrong.Yes , it was just a little shy of a really subtle plot where the good guys were obviously good and the bad guys were obviously bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Avatar is a fairly simplistic (but very well animated) tale of the good guys and the bad guys.
Even if the direction hadn't been so heavy handed, the good guys would have been obviously in the right and the bad guys obviously in the wrong.Yes, it was just a little shy of a really subtle plot where the good guys were obviously good and the bad guys were obviously bad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30839570</id>
	<title>Re:even if Avatar is out of the theaters...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263989820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> "This just means it'll spread all the more fervently via sneakernet."</p><p>Is the 3d version available via sneakernet yet? Nope?</p><p>Oh right... we can't watch 3d at home/computer. I wonder if that has anything to do with the decision?</p><p>What I am saying is: pirating Avatar could be rampant in China... however, it has no barring on a 3d movie as the Internet currently only delivers 2 d's at a time. By limiting purchased viewing to 3d, we can clearly say that no one has watched a pirated copy of "Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience" in China.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" This just means it 'll spread all the more fervently via sneakernet .
" Is the 3d version available via sneakernet yet ?
Nope ? Oh right... we ca n't watch 3d at home/computer .
I wonder if that has anything to do with the decision ? What I am saying is : pirating Avatar could be rampant in China... however , it has no barring on a 3d movie as the Internet currently only delivers 2 d 's at a time .
By limiting purchased viewing to 3d , we can clearly say that no one has watched a pirated copy of " Avatar : An IMAX 3D Experience " in China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "This just means it'll spread all the more fervently via sneakernet.
"Is the 3d version available via sneakernet yet?
Nope?Oh right... we can't watch 3d at home/computer.
I wonder if that has anything to do with the decision?What I am saying is: pirating Avatar could be rampant in China... however, it has no barring on a 3d movie as the Internet currently only delivers 2 d's at a time.
By limiting purchased viewing to 3d, we can clearly say that no one has watched a pirated copy of "Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience" in China.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826816</id>
	<title>Re:Actually</title>
	<author>Ryanrule</author>
	<datestamp>1263907620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>China is facist.</htmltext>
<tokenext>China is facist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>China is facist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827288</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>a8ksh4</author>
	<datestamp>1263911280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I got the impression that their unnaturally nice complexions were supposed to represent/reflect their innocence.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I got the impression that their unnaturally nice complexions were supposed to represent/reflect their innocence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got the impression that their unnaturally nice complexions were supposed to represent/reflect their innocence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829902</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263985860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bogus Ending!</p><p>The whole problem with Avatar is the bogus ending; in the "real world" the Corporations/governments would simply take off from the planet, retire to an orbital platform and use kinetic mass weapons to level the whole freaking planet and take as many rocks as they wanted!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bogus Ending ! The whole problem with Avatar is the bogus ending ; in the " real world " the Corporations/governments would simply take off from the planet , retire to an orbital platform and use kinetic mass weapons to level the whole freaking planet and take as many rocks as they wanted !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bogus Ending!The whole problem with Avatar is the bogus ending; in the "real world" the Corporations/governments would simply take off from the planet, retire to an orbital platform and use kinetic mass weapons to level the whole freaking planet and take as many rocks as they wanted!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827104</id>
	<title>Re:Cuba vs China</title>
	<author>infaustus</author>
	<datestamp>1263909660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Boxer rebellion is not a particularly effective example of resistance to foreign control...unless the foreigners you're talking about are the Qing.  Really, China got its independence because the Japanese took it over before being destroyed by a greater power, not because the Chinese fought off foreign control.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Boxer rebellion is not a particularly effective example of resistance to foreign control...unless the foreigners you 're talking about are the Qing .
Really , China got its independence because the Japanese took it over before being destroyed by a greater power , not because the Chinese fought off foreign control .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Boxer rebellion is not a particularly effective example of resistance to foreign control...unless the foreigners you're talking about are the Qing.
Really, China got its independence because the Japanese took it over before being destroyed by a greater power, not because the Chinese fought off foreign control.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828476</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>nut</author>
	<datestamp>1263923160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you grow up in a place where the food is tough and there is no modern dental care, bad teeth will shorten your lifespan drastically and really downgrade your chances of getting laid.</p><p>Poor dental work gets dealt with in the traditional darwinian fashion in primitive cultures. I recall reading somwhere that when archaeologists dig up the graves of ancient Roman communities they typically mostly had perfect teeth. But I'm too lazy to go and find the reference now..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you grow up in a place where the food is tough and there is no modern dental care , bad teeth will shorten your lifespan drastically and really downgrade your chances of getting laid.Poor dental work gets dealt with in the traditional darwinian fashion in primitive cultures .
I recall reading somwhere that when archaeologists dig up the graves of ancient Roman communities they typically mostly had perfect teeth .
But I 'm too lazy to go and find the reference now. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you grow up in a place where the food is tough and there is no modern dental care, bad teeth will shorten your lifespan drastically and really downgrade your chances of getting laid.Poor dental work gets dealt with in the traditional darwinian fashion in primitive cultures.
I recall reading somwhere that when archaeologists dig up the graves of ancient Roman communities they typically mostly had perfect teeth.
But I'm too lazy to go and find the reference now..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30830692</id>
	<title>Re:even if Avatar is out of the theaters...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263995580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>uh no, the 2D version came out at the same time as the 3D version. Well, at least in Kunming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>uh no , the 2D version came out at the same time as the 3D version .
Well , at least in Kunming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>uh no, the 2D version came out at the same time as the 3D version.
Well, at least in Kunming.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827118</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263909780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, OBL and the republican leadership loved. Both claimed that it was all about Obama.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , OBL and the republican leadership loved .
Both claimed that it was all about Obama .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, OBL and the republican leadership loved.
Both claimed that it was all about Obama.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826010</id>
	<title>So ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1263902280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... which Chinese actress is their equivalent of
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand\_effect" title="wikipedia.org">Barbara Streisand</a> [wikipedia.org]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>... which Chinese actress is their equivalent of Barbara Streisand [ wikipedia.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... which Chinese actress is their equivalent of
Barbara Streisand [wikipedia.org]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827240</id>
	<title>Wow!</title>
	<author>scubamage</author>
	<datestamp>1263910920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So despite all of the ripping on the movie for being simplistic, I'm amazed at how much conversation it has spawned on this site alone. Pretty good for a simple story. Don't you think so?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So despite all of the ripping on the movie for being simplistic , I 'm amazed at how much conversation it has spawned on this site alone .
Pretty good for a simple story .
Do n't you think so ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So despite all of the ripping on the movie for being simplistic, I'm amazed at how much conversation it has spawned on this site alone.
Pretty good for a simple story.
Don't you think so?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826946</id>
	<title>You got it ALL WRONG.</title>
	<author>FatdogHaiku</author>
	<datestamp>1263908520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>What Cuba has is SUGAR far below the artificial price in the US. With the 1960 embargo, we lost one third of our sugar supply, and someone makes big bucks filling that void. Along with citrus and tropical fruit, this makes a seriously large campaign contribution source for incumbents that are willing to keep this potential new source of products shut down.<br> <br>If we wanted Castro to fall, all we had to do was allow American money to have effect on Cuban agriculture. It is a hard thing to sit by and watch wealth being created and have no part of it (except for being the stoop labor, of course). The problem with HAVING peons is keeping them from finding out that something better exists... once they know they start doing crazy stuff like going to sea on an inner-tube. If enough of them are aware, then they burn the palace.<br> <br>It's a moot point because nothing will happen with Cuba until Imperial Sugar, ADM, C&amp;H, Dole, Chiquita, Sunkist, et al have some kind of a market lock in place... after all, that's what they paid for.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What Cuba has is SUGAR far below the artificial price in the US .
With the 1960 embargo , we lost one third of our sugar supply , and someone makes big bucks filling that void .
Along with citrus and tropical fruit , this makes a seriously large campaign contribution source for incumbents that are willing to keep this potential new source of products shut down .
If we wanted Castro to fall , all we had to do was allow American money to have effect on Cuban agriculture .
It is a hard thing to sit by and watch wealth being created and have no part of it ( except for being the stoop labor , of course ) .
The problem with HAVING peons is keeping them from finding out that something better exists... once they know they start doing crazy stuff like going to sea on an inner-tube .
If enough of them are aware , then they burn the palace .
It 's a moot point because nothing will happen with Cuba until Imperial Sugar , ADM , C&amp;H , Dole , Chiquita , Sunkist , et al have some kind of a market lock in place... after all , that 's what they paid for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What Cuba has is SUGAR far below the artificial price in the US.
With the 1960 embargo, we lost one third of our sugar supply, and someone makes big bucks filling that void.
Along with citrus and tropical fruit, this makes a seriously large campaign contribution source for incumbents that are willing to keep this potential new source of products shut down.
If we wanted Castro to fall, all we had to do was allow American money to have effect on Cuban agriculture.
It is a hard thing to sit by and watch wealth being created and have no part of it (except for being the stoop labor, of course).
The problem with HAVING peons is keeping them from finding out that something better exists... once they know they start doing crazy stuff like going to sea on an inner-tube.
If enough of them are aware, then they burn the palace.
It's a moot point because nothing will happen with Cuba until Imperial Sugar, ADM, C&amp;H, Dole, Chiquita, Sunkist, et al have some kind of a market lock in place... after all, that's what they paid for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826286</id>
	<title>Re:Error</title>
	<author>SimonTheSoundMan</author>
	<datestamp>1263903780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasn't the link I supplied. Error on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., not the submitter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't the link I supplied .
Error on /. , not the submitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't the link I supplied.
Error on /., not the submitter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30853570</id>
	<title>Re:WTF???</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1264075680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you know of anybody who actually recalls Confucius in any way? That would be interesting...</p><p>Especially in Confucius-zombie manner mentioned by other posters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you know of anybody who actually recalls Confucius in any way ?
That would be interesting...Especially in Confucius-zombie manner mentioned by other posters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you know of anybody who actually recalls Confucius in any way?
That would be interesting...Especially in Confucius-zombie manner mentioned by other posters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827348</id>
	<title>Re:even if Avatar is out of the theaters...</title>
	<author>fractoid</author>
	<datestamp>1263912060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought it was just an example of the Yellow Peril running from the even more terrifying Fuzzy Blue Peril.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was just an example of the Yellow Peril running from the even more terrifying Fuzzy Blue Peril .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was just an example of the Yellow Peril running from the even more terrifying Fuzzy Blue Peril.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829244</id>
	<title>Re:even if Avatar is out of the theaters...</title>
	<author>ZeRu</author>
	<datestamp>1264020540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why did the communist China pulled the film from theaters?<br>
I thought that the film is anti-capitalist, not anti-communist? Or at least so would some Hugo Chavez-praising loons on sites like digg and slashdot (most of them being on digg of course, people on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. are apparently more mature) say.<br>
Shouldn't they also say that the film is pro-religion?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did the communist China pulled the film from theaters ?
I thought that the film is anti-capitalist , not anti-communist ?
Or at least so would some Hugo Chavez-praising loons on sites like digg and slashdot ( most of them being on digg of course , people on / .
are apparently more mature ) say .
Should n't they also say that the film is pro-religion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why did the communist China pulled the film from theaters?
I thought that the film is anti-capitalist, not anti-communist?
Or at least so would some Hugo Chavez-praising loons on sites like digg and slashdot (most of them being on digg of course, people on /.
are apparently more mature) say.
Shouldn't they also say that the film is pro-religion?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826252</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>NeutronCowboy</author>
	<datestamp>1263903600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The summary is wrong. The article states that there are two quotas at work for all movies: how long they are shown in theaters, and how many foreign movies are allowed to be shown over the course of a year. Avatar stayed on screen for the normal time-period in 2D theaters, and is allowed to exceed the normal runtime in 3D theaters. In other words, the Hong Kong daily made some assumptions about why Avatar didn't exceed the normal runtime for foreign movies. The assumptions might be correct, but are unsupported by anything uttered by officials so far.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary is wrong .
The article states that there are two quotas at work for all movies : how long they are shown in theaters , and how many foreign movies are allowed to be shown over the course of a year .
Avatar stayed on screen for the normal time-period in 2D theaters , and is allowed to exceed the normal runtime in 3D theaters .
In other words , the Hong Kong daily made some assumptions about why Avatar did n't exceed the normal runtime for foreign movies .
The assumptions might be correct , but are unsupported by anything uttered by officials so far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary is wrong.
The article states that there are two quotas at work for all movies: how long they are shown in theaters, and how many foreign movies are allowed to be shown over the course of a year.
Avatar stayed on screen for the normal time-period in 2D theaters, and is allowed to exceed the normal runtime in 3D theaters.
In other words, the Hong Kong daily made some assumptions about why Avatar didn't exceed the normal runtime for foreign movies.
The assumptions might be correct, but are unsupported by anything uttered by officials so far.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888</id>
	<title>even if Avatar is out of the theaters...</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1263901740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This just means it'll spread all the more fervently via sneakernet. That we're doing business with this government while calling Cuba an international pariah is all the more disgusting. Maybe if the Cubans had oil or massive quantities of cheap labor rather than cigars and a nice view....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This just means it 'll spread all the more fervently via sneakernet .
That we 're doing business with this government while calling Cuba an international pariah is all the more disgusting .
Maybe if the Cubans had oil or massive quantities of cheap labor rather than cigars and a nice view... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This just means it'll spread all the more fervently via sneakernet.
That we're doing business with this government while calling Cuba an international pariah is all the more disgusting.
Maybe if the Cubans had oil or massive quantities of cheap labor rather than cigars and a nice view....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829220</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking of Science Fiction Stories....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264020240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering the era, and information that is now available, it might not be such a good idea to snark on the guy.</p><p>For instance, we now now that TB is a bacteriological agent. It is also suspected that eating sugar causes sedation of the immune system. (evidence is scant, but a few studies do exist. For instance, Sanchez, A., et al. Role of Sugars in Human Neutrophilic Phagocytosis, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Nov 1973;261:1180\_1184.  and Bernstein, J., al. Depression of Lymphocyte Transformation Following Oral Glucose Ingestion. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.1997;30:613)</p><p>Considering that the idea of "germs" was "New, and unproven" at the turn of the century, you have to give the guy props for the (then) novel linkage of increased TB occurrence with sugar consumption.</p><p>Also, given the same issues with hygiene, germs, and the overall lack of "Painless dentistry" of that era, linking the getting of a root canal with cancer might not be inappropriate thinking either.  Getting a root canal without sedation would acutely increase the body's stress hormone levels, which has been strongly linked with immune dysfunction.<br>http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/stress</p><p>When judging old scientists, it is important to frame your judgments through the lens of what was available to them at the time they were alive.  Would you fault a scientist from the early 1900s for believing in phlogiston, for instance?</p><p>If anything, the only lesson to be learned here is that correlation is not causation;  Sugar correlates with immune suppression, but might not be directly causal-- likewise, TB infection rate VS sugar intake does not imply that eating sugar gives you TB--  All you can show is that the people that ate excessive sugar were more likely to catch it, for whatever reason. Same with the link between (painful!) root canals and cancer.</p><p>Please go take your preconceived prognostications elsewhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering the era , and information that is now available , it might not be such a good idea to snark on the guy.For instance , we now now that TB is a bacteriological agent .
It is also suspected that eating sugar causes sedation of the immune system .
( evidence is scant , but a few studies do exist .
For instance , Sanchez , A. , et al .
Role of Sugars in Human Neutrophilic Phagocytosis , American Journal of Clinical Nutrition .
Nov 1973 ; 261 : 1180 \ _1184 .
and Bernstein , J. , al .
Depression of Lymphocyte Transformation Following Oral Glucose Ingestion .
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.1997 ; 30 : 613 ) Considering that the idea of " germs " was " New , and unproven " at the turn of the century , you have to give the guy props for the ( then ) novel linkage of increased TB occurrence with sugar consumption.Also , given the same issues with hygiene , germs , and the overall lack of " Painless dentistry " of that era , linking the getting of a root canal with cancer might not be inappropriate thinking either .
Getting a root canal without sedation would acutely increase the body 's stress hormone levels , which has been strongly linked with immune dysfunction.http : //www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/stressWhen judging old scientists , it is important to frame your judgments through the lens of what was available to them at the time they were alive .
Would you fault a scientist from the early 1900s for believing in phlogiston , for instance ? If anything , the only lesson to be learned here is that correlation is not causation ; Sugar correlates with immune suppression , but might not be directly causal-- likewise , TB infection rate VS sugar intake does not imply that eating sugar gives you TB-- All you can show is that the people that ate excessive sugar were more likely to catch it , for whatever reason .
Same with the link between ( painful !
) root canals and cancer.Please go take your preconceived prognostications elsewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering the era, and information that is now available, it might not be such a good idea to snark on the guy.For instance, we now now that TB is a bacteriological agent.
It is also suspected that eating sugar causes sedation of the immune system.
(evidence is scant, but a few studies do exist.
For instance, Sanchez, A., et al.
Role of Sugars in Human Neutrophilic Phagocytosis, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
Nov 1973;261:1180\_1184.
and Bernstein, J., al.
Depression of Lymphocyte Transformation Following Oral Glucose Ingestion.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.1997;30:613)Considering that the idea of "germs" was "New, and unproven" at the turn of the century, you have to give the guy props for the (then) novel linkage of increased TB occurrence with sugar consumption.Also, given the same issues with hygiene, germs, and the overall lack of "Painless dentistry" of that era, linking the getting of a root canal with cancer might not be inappropriate thinking either.
Getting a root canal without sedation would acutely increase the body's stress hormone levels, which has been strongly linked with immune dysfunction.http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/stressWhen judging old scientists, it is important to frame your judgments through the lens of what was available to them at the time they were alive.
Would you fault a scientist from the early 1900s for believing in phlogiston, for instance?If anything, the only lesson to be learned here is that correlation is not causation;  Sugar correlates with immune suppression, but might not be directly causal-- likewise, TB infection rate VS sugar intake does not imply that eating sugar gives you TB--  All you can show is that the people that ate excessive sugar were more likely to catch it, for whatever reason.
Same with the link between (painful!
) root canals and cancer.Please go take your preconceived prognostications elsewhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826800</id>
	<title>Re:Puzzling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263907440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The 2D version is "too provocative in its anti-authoritarian message" and draws "attention to the sensitive issue of forced evictions" but the 3D and IMAX versions are ok? And censors realized it one week after they approved the movie and a lot of people already watched it? I'm puzzled.<br>Instead could that be a not-too-harsh message to the USA and the world after last week Google affair?</p></div><p>Protectionism disguised as censorship!</p><p>3D theatres are considerably fewer, and and the ticket is maybe more than many would pay for.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The 2D version is " too provocative in its anti-authoritarian message " and draws " attention to the sensitive issue of forced evictions " but the 3D and IMAX versions are ok ?
And censors realized it one week after they approved the movie and a lot of people already watched it ?
I 'm puzzled.Instead could that be a not-too-harsh message to the USA and the world after last week Google affair ? Protectionism disguised as censorship ! 3D theatres are considerably fewer , and and the ticket is maybe more than many would pay for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 2D version is "too provocative in its anti-authoritarian message" and draws "attention to the sensitive issue of forced evictions" but the 3D and IMAX versions are ok?
And censors realized it one week after they approved the movie and a lot of people already watched it?
I'm puzzled.Instead could that be a not-too-harsh message to the USA and the world after last week Google affair?Protectionism disguised as censorship!3D theatres are considerably fewer, and and the ticket is maybe more than many would pay for.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828716</id>
	<title>Re:That's about right if your name is Fidel Castro</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263925740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>America has had the same leader for 50 years?  Really?  And does that leadership take active steps to prevent people from participating in the modern world?  Such as BANNING computers?  I would think even a Slashdot teenage/college idiot like yourself could appreciate the impact of the government NOT ALLOWING its citizens to even purchase a PC.  But, I guess it is too important for you to bash the US while whacking off to pictures of Castro, Mao, Lenin, and Marx.  Have fun with that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>America has had the same leader for 50 years ?
Really ? And does that leadership take active steps to prevent people from participating in the modern world ?
Such as BANNING computers ?
I would think even a Slashdot teenage/college idiot like yourself could appreciate the impact of the government NOT ALLOWING its citizens to even purchase a PC .
But , I guess it is too important for you to bash the US while whacking off to pictures of Castro , Mao , Lenin , and Marx .
Have fun with that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>America has had the same leader for 50 years?
Really?  And does that leadership take active steps to prevent people from participating in the modern world?
Such as BANNING computers?
I would think even a Slashdot teenage/college idiot like yourself could appreciate the impact of the government NOT ALLOWING its citizens to even purchase a PC.
But, I guess it is too important for you to bash the US while whacking off to pictures of Castro, Mao, Lenin, and Marx.
Have fun with that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829402</id>
	<title>Apple Daily?</title>
	<author>I didn't</author>
	<datestamp>1263979980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are famous in being "emotional" in their reporting. A huge grain of salt is recommended.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are famous in being " emotional " in their reporting .
A huge grain of salt is recommended .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are famous in being "emotional" in their reporting.
A huge grain of salt is recommended.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826154</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>MaWeiTao</author>
	<datestamp>1263903120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think anyone was suggesting that Avatar symbolized hatred for any nation. Rather the discussion dealt with Avatars simplistic criticism of technology and embrace of the unrealistic noble savage.</p><p>Although China is a lot closer to how humans are depicted in Avatar than America is I don't think their problem is with the core message of the movie. Rather, the Chinese government and indeed many Chinese citizens have problems with entertainment where individuals rise up against the establishment. It probably wouldn't have been a big deal if it hadn't been for this movie's popularity in China.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think anyone was suggesting that Avatar symbolized hatred for any nation .
Rather the discussion dealt with Avatars simplistic criticism of technology and embrace of the unrealistic noble savage.Although China is a lot closer to how humans are depicted in Avatar than America is I do n't think their problem is with the core message of the movie .
Rather , the Chinese government and indeed many Chinese citizens have problems with entertainment where individuals rise up against the establishment .
It probably would n't have been a big deal if it had n't been for this movie 's popularity in China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think anyone was suggesting that Avatar symbolized hatred for any nation.
Rather the discussion dealt with Avatars simplistic criticism of technology and embrace of the unrealistic noble savage.Although China is a lot closer to how humans are depicted in Avatar than America is I don't think their problem is with the core message of the movie.
Rather, the Chinese government and indeed many Chinese citizens have problems with entertainment where individuals rise up against the establishment.
It probably wouldn't have been a big deal if it hadn't been for this movie's popularity in China.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826530</id>
	<title>Outmoded Classifications (Re:Actually)</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1263905340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I thought Avatar was about the people triumphing over big business. You'd think that would go down well in supposedly communist China.</p></div></blockquote><p>I'm not sure the old classification schemes, such as "communist" mean much anymore. In the old days political control and economic control went hand-in-hand. However, economic freedom and political freedom have become relatively independent factors over time. China offers a fairly high amount of economic freedom but not political freedom. France is almost the reverse.</p><p>(A third factor may be sexual/family freedom, being that some nations heavily regulate sexual and family arrangement issues.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought Avatar was about the people triumphing over big business .
You 'd think that would go down well in supposedly communist China.I 'm not sure the old classification schemes , such as " communist " mean much anymore .
In the old days political control and economic control went hand-in-hand .
However , economic freedom and political freedom have become relatively independent factors over time .
China offers a fairly high amount of economic freedom but not political freedom .
France is almost the reverse .
( A third factor may be sexual/family freedom , being that some nations heavily regulate sexual and family arrangement issues .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought Avatar was about the people triumphing over big business.
You'd think that would go down well in supposedly communist China.I'm not sure the old classification schemes, such as "communist" mean much anymore.
In the old days political control and economic control went hand-in-hand.
However, economic freedom and political freedom have become relatively independent factors over time.
China offers a fairly high amount of economic freedom but not political freedom.
France is almost the reverse.
(A third factor may be sexual/family freedom, being that some nations heavily regulate sexual and family arrangement issues.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827518</id>
	<title>Avatar was a mash-up movie</title>
	<author>tkrotchko</author>
	<datestamp>1263913500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every kid of a certain age who has seen "Avatar" correctly notes that it's a mash-up of "Fern Gully" <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104254/" title="imdb.com">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104254/</a> [imdb.com] and the Disney version of "Pocahontas" <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114148/" title="imdb.com">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114148/</a> [imdb.com].</p><p>The plot of Avatar is hardly new.  It was an entertaining movie, but let's not pretend any of this was a new idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every kid of a certain age who has seen " Avatar " correctly notes that it 's a mash-up of " Fern Gully " http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0104254/ [ imdb.com ] and the Disney version of " Pocahontas " http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0114148/ [ imdb.com ] .The plot of Avatar is hardly new .
It was an entertaining movie , but let 's not pretend any of this was a new idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every kid of a certain age who has seen "Avatar" correctly notes that it's a mash-up of "Fern Gully" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104254/ [imdb.com] and the Disney version of "Pocahontas" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114148/ [imdb.com].The plot of Avatar is hardly new.
It was an entertaining movie, but let's not pretend any of this was a new idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826458</id>
	<title>Re:Puzzling</title>
	<author>Korbeau</author>
	<datestamp>1263904800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The 2D version is "too provocative in its anti-authoritarian message" and draws "attention to the sensitive issue of forced evictions" but the 3D and IMAX versions are ok? And censors realized it one week after they approved the movie and a lot of people already watched it? I'm puzzled.<br>Instead could that be a not-too-harsh message to the USA and the world after last week Google affair?</p></div><p>The thing is, in 2D you realize how crappy the storyline is and are forced to focus on cheezy black&amp;white ethics to discuss it in disgust with friends !<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Of course, I saw the film in 3D so I don't even remember what it was all about.  I think the Blue Man Group made an appearance at some point, and it was about flying mountains, dragons, borderline strange inter-species sex and Americans going back in a sequel to get some proper ass-kicking done?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The 2D version is " too provocative in its anti-authoritarian message " and draws " attention to the sensitive issue of forced evictions " but the 3D and IMAX versions are ok ?
And censors realized it one week after they approved the movie and a lot of people already watched it ?
I 'm puzzled.Instead could that be a not-too-harsh message to the USA and the world after last week Google affair ? The thing is , in 2D you realize how crappy the storyline is and are forced to focus on cheezy black&amp;white ethics to discuss it in disgust with friends !
: ) Of course , I saw the film in 3D so I do n't even remember what it was all about .
I think the Blue Man Group made an appearance at some point , and it was about flying mountains , dragons , borderline strange inter-species sex and Americans going back in a sequel to get some proper ass-kicking done ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 2D version is "too provocative in its anti-authoritarian message" and draws "attention to the sensitive issue of forced evictions" but the 3D and IMAX versions are ok?
And censors realized it one week after they approved the movie and a lot of people already watched it?
I'm puzzled.Instead could that be a not-too-harsh message to the USA and the world after last week Google affair?The thing is, in 2D you realize how crappy the storyline is and are forced to focus on cheezy black&amp;white ethics to discuss it in disgust with friends !
:)Of course, I saw the film in 3D so I don't even remember what it was all about.
I think the Blue Man Group made an appearance at some point, and it was about flying mountains, dragons, borderline strange inter-species sex and Americans going back in a sequel to get some proper ass-kicking done?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827116</id>
	<title>That's about right if your name is Fidel Castro...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263909780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Everything is America's fault" is just Castro's propaganda to justify the failure of the communist regime. Cuba had the Soviet Union and now Venezuela pour money over it on large quantities, and yet the "ferocious local population" would risk their lives and their families' by crossing the sea in a homemade raft just to escape the regime's oppression and failure to provide even basic things. When your government is some crazy military who has remained in power by force for 50 years and has isolated the country from the rest of the world, you don't need foreign enemies to ruin your economy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Everything is America 's fault " is just Castro 's propaganda to justify the failure of the communist regime .
Cuba had the Soviet Union and now Venezuela pour money over it on large quantities , and yet the " ferocious local population " would risk their lives and their families ' by crossing the sea in a homemade raft just to escape the regime 's oppression and failure to provide even basic things .
When your government is some crazy military who has remained in power by force for 50 years and has isolated the country from the rest of the world , you do n't need foreign enemies to ruin your economy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Everything is America's fault" is just Castro's propaganda to justify the failure of the communist regime.
Cuba had the Soviet Union and now Venezuela pour money over it on large quantities, and yet the "ferocious local population" would risk their lives and their families' by crossing the sea in a homemade raft just to escape the regime's oppression and failure to provide even basic things.
When your government is some crazy military who has remained in power by force for 50 years and has isolated the country from the rest of the world, you don't need foreign enemies to ruin your economy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826520</id>
	<title>Re:Puzzling</title>
	<author>igadget78</author>
	<datestamp>1263905280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The 2D version is "too provocative in its anti-authoritarian message" and draws "attention to the sensitive issue of forced evictions" but the 3D and IMAX versions are ok? And censors realized it one week after they approved the movie and a lot of people already watched it? I'm puzzled.
Instead could that be a not-too-harsh message to the USA and the world after last week Google affair?</p></div><p>They only took the 2D version out of the Theatres because its already been uploaded to the Google Servers via the ie6 vulnerability.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The 2D version is " too provocative in its anti-authoritarian message " and draws " attention to the sensitive issue of forced evictions " but the 3D and IMAX versions are ok ?
And censors realized it one week after they approved the movie and a lot of people already watched it ?
I 'm puzzled .
Instead could that be a not-too-harsh message to the USA and the world after last week Google affair ? They only took the 2D version out of the Theatres because its already been uploaded to the Google Servers via the ie6 vulnerability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 2D version is "too provocative in its anti-authoritarian message" and draws "attention to the sensitive issue of forced evictions" but the 3D and IMAX versions are ok?
And censors realized it one week after they approved the movie and a lot of people already watched it?
I'm puzzled.
Instead could that be a not-too-harsh message to the USA and the world after last week Google affair?They only took the 2D version out of the Theatres because its already been uploaded to the Google Servers via the ie6 vulnerability.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826470</id>
	<title>Oh, c'mon!</title>
	<author>CherniyVolk</author>
	<datestamp>1263904860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look.  I can not hold a grudge against any man who takes pride and preference in his own; family, kind, nation, company or foot ball team.</p><p>China actually has a good thing in my opinion.  While Hollywood moves to feed crap to whoever will watch, they seem to also decide to give those same people something a little less media driven.  I wish the United States did something like this, maybe people might gain a sense of patriotism or pride, maybe the United States could make theatres do a mandatory showing for two months out of the year, what Brittany Spears looks like before the plastic surgery, minus the choreography, minus special FX, plus everday cloths.  But, men don't like looking at ugly girls is what Hollywood research has found...  Point is, a lot of people actually believe something in each one of these movies, and to be reminded of reality isn't such a bad idea.  However it might be done, exposure to Hollywood techniques to fabricate sex icons, or diversion into more historical and culturally relevant themes.  I mean seriously, it's so bad in America that Americans actually watch "Reality TV Shows"... god forbid they knock on their neighbors door and say "Hi, I'm Jack, how are you?".</p><p>Guys, this really isn't a time to try to bash the commie here.  China had these cultural integrity programs in place for a long time.  Enter Avatar a film that Americans apparently love, slot it to be inevitably cut short by predefined schedules, well known in Hollywood... only to plaster the calculated results across American news outlets to garner a social reaction to the issue.  Mean while China is like... what?</p><p>I saw Avatar... I thought it was OK.  Who the hell am I to get angry because China decides not to show it's citizens something else?  This anger steams from some fucked up idea that we have a right to business where ever.  You're stealing my customers!  This is going to result in potential loss!  China has billions of people, I have a right to take a dollar from each of them!  This is stupid fellas.  It's their decision, and as far as I'm concerned, I applaud their willingness to use the theaters sometimes to give the people something of value, even if it's less "entertaining".</p><p>Go China!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look .
I can not hold a grudge against any man who takes pride and preference in his own ; family , kind , nation , company or foot ball team.China actually has a good thing in my opinion .
While Hollywood moves to feed crap to whoever will watch , they seem to also decide to give those same people something a little less media driven .
I wish the United States did something like this , maybe people might gain a sense of patriotism or pride , maybe the United States could make theatres do a mandatory showing for two months out of the year , what Brittany Spears looks like before the plastic surgery , minus the choreography , minus special FX , plus everday cloths .
But , men do n't like looking at ugly girls is what Hollywood research has found... Point is , a lot of people actually believe something in each one of these movies , and to be reminded of reality is n't such a bad idea .
However it might be done , exposure to Hollywood techniques to fabricate sex icons , or diversion into more historical and culturally relevant themes .
I mean seriously , it 's so bad in America that Americans actually watch " Reality TV Shows " ... god forbid they knock on their neighbors door and say " Hi , I 'm Jack , how are you ?
" .Guys , this really is n't a time to try to bash the commie here .
China had these cultural integrity programs in place for a long time .
Enter Avatar a film that Americans apparently love , slot it to be inevitably cut short by predefined schedules , well known in Hollywood... only to plaster the calculated results across American news outlets to garner a social reaction to the issue .
Mean while China is like... what ? I saw Avatar... I thought it was OK. Who the hell am I to get angry because China decides not to show it 's citizens something else ?
This anger steams from some fucked up idea that we have a right to business where ever .
You 're stealing my customers !
This is going to result in potential loss !
China has billions of people , I have a right to take a dollar from each of them !
This is stupid fellas .
It 's their decision , and as far as I 'm concerned , I applaud their willingness to use the theaters sometimes to give the people something of value , even if it 's less " entertaining " .Go China !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look.
I can not hold a grudge against any man who takes pride and preference in his own; family, kind, nation, company or foot ball team.China actually has a good thing in my opinion.
While Hollywood moves to feed crap to whoever will watch, they seem to also decide to give those same people something a little less media driven.
I wish the United States did something like this, maybe people might gain a sense of patriotism or pride, maybe the United States could make theatres do a mandatory showing for two months out of the year, what Brittany Spears looks like before the plastic surgery, minus the choreography, minus special FX, plus everday cloths.
But, men don't like looking at ugly girls is what Hollywood research has found...  Point is, a lot of people actually believe something in each one of these movies, and to be reminded of reality isn't such a bad idea.
However it might be done, exposure to Hollywood techniques to fabricate sex icons, or diversion into more historical and culturally relevant themes.
I mean seriously, it's so bad in America that Americans actually watch "Reality TV Shows"... god forbid they knock on their neighbors door and say "Hi, I'm Jack, how are you?
".Guys, this really isn't a time to try to bash the commie here.
China had these cultural integrity programs in place for a long time.
Enter Avatar a film that Americans apparently love, slot it to be inevitably cut short by predefined schedules, well known in Hollywood... only to plaster the calculated results across American news outlets to garner a social reaction to the issue.
Mean while China is like... what?I saw Avatar... I thought it was OK.  Who the hell am I to get angry because China decides not to show it's citizens something else?
This anger steams from some fucked up idea that we have a right to business where ever.
You're stealing my customers!
This is going to result in potential loss!
China has billions of people, I have a right to take a dollar from each of them!
This is stupid fellas.
It's their decision, and as far as I'm concerned, I applaud their willingness to use the theaters sometimes to give the people something of value, even if it's less "entertaining".Go China!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829654</id>
	<title>let's hope we all turn communist!</title>
	<author>nazsco</author>
	<datestamp>1263983100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can only dream with a day when I enter a movie theater and I have the chance to actually see something entertaining and not mind-numbing.</p><p>Like the documentaries of some time ago. Today documentaries are or conspiracy theory or some hippie crap that tries to explain simples things like quantum mechanics as some sort of good karma.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can only dream with a day when I enter a movie theater and I have the chance to actually see something entertaining and not mind-numbing.Like the documentaries of some time ago .
Today documentaries are or conspiracy theory or some hippie crap that tries to explain simples things like quantum mechanics as some sort of good karma .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can only dream with a day when I enter a movie theater and I have the chance to actually see something entertaining and not mind-numbing.Like the documentaries of some time ago.
Today documentaries are or conspiracy theory or some hippie crap that tries to explain simples things like quantum mechanics as some sort of good karma.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827042</id>
	<title>Re:even if Avatar is out of the theaters...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263909180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So... China's only playing the 1-D version?  How does that work?</p><p>Imagine a movie one pixel high.  Wow!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So... China 's only playing the 1-D version ?
How does that work ? Imagine a movie one pixel high .
Wow !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So... China's only playing the 1-D version?
How does that work?Imagine a movie one pixel high.
Wow!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826396</id>
	<title>Re:even if Avatar is out of the theaters...</title>
	<author>timeOday</author>
	<datestamp>1263904440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>But it's not even out of theaters in China; they're still running the 3d version on 900 screens.  I think what China is defending is national pride, trying to artificially level out the success of foreign vs. domestic films, and preserving the traditional Chinese identity.
<p>
As for Cuba, I guess it's the same thing on our part.  Our pride can't tolerate Cuba's defiance.  Look at Vietnam, and how long that dragged on even though the outcome was more or less certain, because each President knew the American people would hate a "loser" President.  Quite a few people consider national pride alone enough of a reason to keep sending people to their deaths, rationalizing that weakness invites aggression.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But it 's not even out of theaters in China ; they 're still running the 3d version on 900 screens .
I think what China is defending is national pride , trying to artificially level out the success of foreign vs. domestic films , and preserving the traditional Chinese identity .
As for Cuba , I guess it 's the same thing on our part .
Our pride ca n't tolerate Cuba 's defiance .
Look at Vietnam , and how long that dragged on even though the outcome was more or less certain , because each President knew the American people would hate a " loser " President .
Quite a few people consider national pride alone enough of a reason to keep sending people to their deaths , rationalizing that weakness invites aggression .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it's not even out of theaters in China; they're still running the 3d version on 900 screens.
I think what China is defending is national pride, trying to artificially level out the success of foreign vs. domestic films, and preserving the traditional Chinese identity.
As for Cuba, I guess it's the same thing on our part.
Our pride can't tolerate Cuba's defiance.
Look at Vietnam, and how long that dragged on even though the outcome was more or less certain, because each President knew the American people would hate a "loser" President.
Quite a few people consider national pride alone enough of a reason to keep sending people to their deaths, rationalizing that weakness invites aggression.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827406</id>
	<title>Re:That's about right if your name is Fidel Castro</title>
	<author>internettoughguy</author>
	<datestamp>1263912480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Compared to the US-backed Batista regime, Castro was more or less a Santa in green clothes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Compared to the US-backed Batista regime , Castro was more or less a Santa in green clothes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Compared to the US-backed Batista regime, Castro was more or less a Santa in green clothes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829966</id>
	<title>Hold your horses guys...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263986700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So far the claim that China sensoring this movie is no more than speculations.</p><p>Facts:<br>1. Foreign movies are rarely shown in cinemas for more than 10 days in China. China is very protective of it's own film industry.<br>2. Avatar has been running well more than 10 days in China before being taken off</p><p>If chinese authoritys wanted to sensor this movie, why allow it to run in the first place?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So far the claim that China sensoring this movie is no more than speculations.Facts : 1 .
Foreign movies are rarely shown in cinemas for more than 10 days in China .
China is very protective of it 's own film industry.2 .
Avatar has been running well more than 10 days in China before being taken offIf chinese authoritys wanted to sensor this movie , why allow it to run in the first place ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So far the claim that China sensoring this movie is no more than speculations.Facts:1.
Foreign movies are rarely shown in cinemas for more than 10 days in China.
China is very protective of it's own film industry.2.
Avatar has been running well more than 10 days in China before being taken offIf chinese authoritys wanted to sensor this movie, why allow it to run in the first place?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825896</id>
	<title>Piracy</title>
	<author>BiggoronSword</author>
	<datestamp>1263901740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well this is just going to increase the amount of piracy in China.  Which of course will piss off the US and the MPAA even more.  Great job China!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well this is just going to increase the amount of piracy in China .
Which of course will piss off the US and the MPAA even more .
Great job China !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well this is just going to increase the amount of piracy in China.
Which of course will piss off the US and the MPAA even more.
Great job China!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827212</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, c'mon!</title>
	<author>sudden.zero</author>
	<datestamp>1263910620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No! Fxxx China and Walmart!</htmltext>
<tokenext>No !
Fxxx China and Walmart !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No!
Fxxx China and Walmart!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30830134</id>
	<title>Just saw Avatar on the mainland...</title>
	<author>shekared</author>
	<datestamp>1263988620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm an American living in Chongqing, China and saw Avatar in 3D on the 18th.  There were 3x as many showings of the film in 3D as anything else, including the 2D version, so I can see no reason yanking the 2D version would make any difference.  The movie is hugely popular here with many of the showtimes sold out well in advance.  Aside from that, bootleg copies are available on any street corner or DVD shop around here.  Copies were also available on the streets of Shanghai before the theatrical release in the states.  Useless and stupid for the government to yank 2D showings.  Then again I never doubt the stupidity of the CPC.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm an American living in Chongqing , China and saw Avatar in 3D on the 18th .
There were 3x as many showings of the film in 3D as anything else , including the 2D version , so I can see no reason yanking the 2D version would make any difference .
The movie is hugely popular here with many of the showtimes sold out well in advance .
Aside from that , bootleg copies are available on any street corner or DVD shop around here .
Copies were also available on the streets of Shanghai before the theatrical release in the states .
Useless and stupid for the government to yank 2D showings .
Then again I never doubt the stupidity of the CPC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm an American living in Chongqing, China and saw Avatar in 3D on the 18th.
There were 3x as many showings of the film in 3D as anything else, including the 2D version, so I can see no reason yanking the 2D version would make any difference.
The movie is hugely popular here with many of the showtimes sold out well in advance.
Aside from that, bootleg copies are available on any street corner or DVD shop around here.
Copies were also available on the streets of Shanghai before the theatrical release in the states.
Useless and stupid for the government to yank 2D showings.
Then again I never doubt the stupidity of the CPC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827294</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, c'mon!</title>
	<author>Sangloth</author>
	<datestamp>1263911340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, what China is doing is wrong. I saw Avatar, and while I was impressed by the technical and artistic wizardry, the movie plot was meh. That said (I think you'd agree), it was a fairly basic criticism of American treatment of Native Americans. The allegation here is that the Chinese don't want comparisons being drawn to what's being done today in modern China. (I vaguely remember that more then million people were evicted to create the 3 Gorges dam. ) What they are doing here is trying to censor political speech. Censoring political speech is wrong. <br> <br>

Censoring media in general is also wrong. There is an inherent assumption when you choose which books or movies are okay to watch, that assumption is that you are better suited to decide what John Doe should watch then John Doe is. The assumption that other people are more qualified to handle your life then you are is a recipe for stripping people of their rights. Also, while I have not seen this specific Chow Yun Fat / Confucius movie, I have seen more then a couple Chinese films, and it's fairly likely that this one is also jingoistic crap.
<br> <br>
Sangloth<br>
I'd appreciate any comment with a logical basis... it doesn't even have to agree with me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , what China is doing is wrong .
I saw Avatar , and while I was impressed by the technical and artistic wizardry , the movie plot was meh .
That said ( I think you 'd agree ) , it was a fairly basic criticism of American treatment of Native Americans .
The allegation here is that the Chinese do n't want comparisons being drawn to what 's being done today in modern China .
( I vaguely remember that more then million people were evicted to create the 3 Gorges dam .
) What they are doing here is trying to censor political speech .
Censoring political speech is wrong .
Censoring media in general is also wrong .
There is an inherent assumption when you choose which books or movies are okay to watch , that assumption is that you are better suited to decide what John Doe should watch then John Doe is .
The assumption that other people are more qualified to handle your life then you are is a recipe for stripping people of their rights .
Also , while I have not seen this specific Chow Yun Fat / Confucius movie , I have seen more then a couple Chinese films , and it 's fairly likely that this one is also jingoistic crap .
Sangloth I 'd appreciate any comment with a logical basis... it does n't even have to agree with me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, what China is doing is wrong.
I saw Avatar, and while I was impressed by the technical and artistic wizardry, the movie plot was meh.
That said (I think you'd agree), it was a fairly basic criticism of American treatment of Native Americans.
The allegation here is that the Chinese don't want comparisons being drawn to what's being done today in modern China.
(I vaguely remember that more then million people were evicted to create the 3 Gorges dam.
) What they are doing here is trying to censor political speech.
Censoring political speech is wrong.
Censoring media in general is also wrong.
There is an inherent assumption when you choose which books or movies are okay to watch, that assumption is that you are better suited to decide what John Doe should watch then John Doe is.
The assumption that other people are more qualified to handle your life then you are is a recipe for stripping people of their rights.
Also, while I have not seen this specific Chow Yun Fat / Confucius movie, I have seen more then a couple Chinese films, and it's fairly likely that this one is also jingoistic crap.
Sangloth
I'd appreciate any comment with a logical basis... it doesn't even have to agree with me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826454</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>haruchai</author>
	<datestamp>1263904800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Around the turn of the 20th century, Dr Weston A. Price, a dentist, found indgenous peoples who avoided unrefined foods to<br>have much better dental health than city dwellers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Around the turn of the 20th century , Dr Weston A. Price , a dentist , found indgenous peoples who avoided unrefined foods tohave much better dental health than city dwellers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Around the turn of the 20th century, Dr Weston A. Price, a dentist, found indgenous peoples who avoided unrefined foods tohave much better dental health than city dwellers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827148</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263910020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>To me, I was more puzzled by how a race of hunter/gatherers have absolutely perfect teeth to a person, than seeing that fictional sides in a sci fi movie related to real life groups.</p></div><p>Neytiri clearly had some irregular teeth, albeit nothing like the stereotypical Briton's: <a href="http://www.avatarmovie.com/images/wallpaper\_07\_1280x1024.jpg" title="avatarmovie.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.avatarmovie.com/images/wallpaper\_07\_1280x1024.jpg</a> [avatarmovie.com]</p><p>I didn't notice it in the actual movie, but then I was more than likely staring at a point fixedly below her face.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To me , I was more puzzled by how a race of hunter/gatherers have absolutely perfect teeth to a person , than seeing that fictional sides in a sci fi movie related to real life groups.Neytiri clearly had some irregular teeth , albeit nothing like the stereotypical Briton 's : http : //www.avatarmovie.com/images/wallpaper \ _07 \ _1280x1024.jpg [ avatarmovie.com ] I did n't notice it in the actual movie , but then I was more than likely staring at a point fixedly below her face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To me, I was more puzzled by how a race of hunter/gatherers have absolutely perfect teeth to a person, than seeing that fictional sides in a sci fi movie related to real life groups.Neytiri clearly had some irregular teeth, albeit nothing like the stereotypical Briton's: http://www.avatarmovie.com/images/wallpaper\_07\_1280x1024.jpg [avatarmovie.com]I didn't notice it in the actual movie, but then I was more than likely staring at a point fixedly below her face.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827526</id>
	<title>Re:Cuba vs China</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263913680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, sure. Why don't you go marry Fidel Castro? Stupid cumbag.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , sure .
Why do n't you go marry Fidel Castro ?
Stupid cumbag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, sure.
Why don't you go marry Fidel Castro?
Stupid cumbag.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828106</id>
	<title>Foreign nation pulls bad foreign film</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1263919620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Foreign nation pulls bad foreign movie in favour of local movie. Film starring Chow-Yun Fat at 11.<br> <br>

Seriously, could this be less of an issue, it's still playing in 3D cinema's. It's not censorship, after seeing avatar I'd rather watch a film about Confucius and I cant speak Mandarin (or Cantonese).<br> <br>

More like non-troversy</htmltext>
<tokenext>Foreign nation pulls bad foreign movie in favour of local movie .
Film starring Chow-Yun Fat at 11 .
Seriously , could this be less of an issue , it 's still playing in 3D cinema 's .
It 's not censorship , after seeing avatar I 'd rather watch a film about Confucius and I cant speak Mandarin ( or Cantonese ) .
More like non-troversy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Foreign nation pulls bad foreign movie in favour of local movie.
Film starring Chow-Yun Fat at 11.
Seriously, could this be less of an issue, it's still playing in 3D cinema's.
It's not censorship, after seeing avatar I'd rather watch a film about Confucius and I cant speak Mandarin (or Cantonese).
More like non-troversy</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30839058</id>
	<title>Re:even if Avatar is out of the theaters...</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1263987420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Cuba world sell us a few cheap TV sets and microwaves, I'm  sure we could work this out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Cuba world sell us a few cheap TV sets and microwaves , I 'm sure we could work this out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Cuba world sell us a few cheap TV sets and microwaves, I'm  sure we could work this out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827214</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263910620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;Avatar is a fairly simplistic (but very well animated) tale of the good guys and the bad guys.</p><p>In which the bad guys are the marines and where (in the script, but not in the movie) "The miners lock and load like the redblooded redneck NRA supporters they are."</p><p>You can have good guys and bad guys, but who these people are is just as important. I refused to watch the movie for this reason, as by and large people in the military are (Hollywood stereotyping aside) much more upright and ethical than people in the general population.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; Avatar is a fairly simplistic ( but very well animated ) tale of the good guys and the bad guys.In which the bad guys are the marines and where ( in the script , but not in the movie ) " The miners lock and load like the redblooded redneck NRA supporters they are .
" You can have good guys and bad guys , but who these people are is just as important .
I refused to watch the movie for this reason , as by and large people in the military are ( Hollywood stereotyping aside ) much more upright and ethical than people in the general population .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;Avatar is a fairly simplistic (but very well animated) tale of the good guys and the bad guys.In which the bad guys are the marines and where (in the script, but not in the movie) "The miners lock and load like the redblooded redneck NRA supporters they are.
"You can have good guys and bad guys, but who these people are is just as important.
I refused to watch the movie for this reason, as by and large people in the military are (Hollywood stereotyping aside) much more upright and ethical than people in the general population.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263903120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just considered it a movie.  No more.  There are a lot of people drawing parallels between the RDA and $group\_in\_authority and the Na'vi and $persecuted\_group.  However, I'm sure with any popular movie which isn't using the same stale IP as before, this could be put into place.  People alluded the Empire in Star Wars to groups in real life when that debuted.</p><p>"Avatar" is a movie, a piece of sci-fi.  No more.  The RDA doesn't symbolize US marines any more than the UAC space marines in Doom: The Movie.</p><p>To me, I was more puzzled by how a race of hunter/gatherers have absolutely perfect teeth to a person, than seeing that fictional sides in a sci fi movie related to real life groups.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just considered it a movie .
No more .
There are a lot of people drawing parallels between the RDA and $ group \ _in \ _authority and the Na'vi and $ persecuted \ _group .
However , I 'm sure with any popular movie which is n't using the same stale IP as before , this could be put into place .
People alluded the Empire in Star Wars to groups in real life when that debuted .
" Avatar " is a movie , a piece of sci-fi .
No more .
The RDA does n't symbolize US marines any more than the UAC space marines in Doom : The Movie.To me , I was more puzzled by how a race of hunter/gatherers have absolutely perfect teeth to a person , than seeing that fictional sides in a sci fi movie related to real life groups .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just considered it a movie.
No more.
There are a lot of people drawing parallels between the RDA and $group\_in\_authority and the Na'vi and $persecuted\_group.
However, I'm sure with any popular movie which isn't using the same stale IP as before, this could be put into place.
People alluded the Empire in Star Wars to groups in real life when that debuted.
"Avatar" is a movie, a piece of sci-fi.
No more.
The RDA doesn't symbolize US marines any more than the UAC space marines in Doom: The Movie.To me, I was more puzzled by how a race of hunter/gatherers have absolutely perfect teeth to a person, than seeing that fictional sides in a sci fi movie related to real life groups.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827014</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>im\_thatoneguy</author>
	<datestamp>1263909000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't even demonize space Marines if you actually pay attention during the movie.  "They've ceased being soldiers.  They're now mercenaries, guns for hire." or something like that.   They're Blackwater.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't even demonize space Marines if you actually pay attention during the movie .
" They 've ceased being soldiers .
They 're now mercenaries , guns for hire .
" or something like that .
They 're Blackwater .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't even demonize space Marines if you actually pay attention during the movie.
"They've ceased being soldiers.
They're now mercenaries, guns for hire.
" or something like that.
They're Blackwater.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30831076</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>IndustrialComplex</author>
	<datestamp>1263999000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>That's a very odd thing to be puzzled about. Presumably, being in harmony with nature, they have a very good diet and look after their bodies. Do you also wonder why animals have such good teeth, even though they don't have toothbrushes?<br></i></p><p>The concept of natural harmony is simply reproducing as fast as the death rate.  I did wonder about animals having good teeth, until I remembered that most animals don't live beyond 10-20 years.</p><p>The fibrous tissues of plants helps clean the teeth of herbivores.<br>Carnivores don't get much sugar, and the ripping and tearing also provides a cleaning action.<br>Rodents naturally don't worry about decay since their teeth form faster than they could decay.</p><p>Harmony with nature is just a human concept that relates to our perception of the current situation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a very odd thing to be puzzled about .
Presumably , being in harmony with nature , they have a very good diet and look after their bodies .
Do you also wonder why animals have such good teeth , even though they do n't have toothbrushes ? The concept of natural harmony is simply reproducing as fast as the death rate .
I did wonder about animals having good teeth , until I remembered that most animals do n't live beyond 10-20 years.The fibrous tissues of plants helps clean the teeth of herbivores.Carnivores do n't get much sugar , and the ripping and tearing also provides a cleaning action.Rodents naturally do n't worry about decay since their teeth form faster than they could decay.Harmony with nature is just a human concept that relates to our perception of the current situation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a very odd thing to be puzzled about.
Presumably, being in harmony with nature, they have a very good diet and look after their bodies.
Do you also wonder why animals have such good teeth, even though they don't have toothbrushes?The concept of natural harmony is simply reproducing as fast as the death rate.
I did wonder about animals having good teeth, until I remembered that most animals don't live beyond 10-20 years.The fibrous tissues of plants helps clean the teeth of herbivores.Carnivores don't get much sugar, and the ripping and tearing also provides a cleaning action.Rodents naturally don't worry about decay since their teeth form faster than they could decay.Harmony with nature is just a human concept that relates to our perception of the current situation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30831418</id>
	<title>Re:Avatar was a mash-up movie</title>
	<author>BoredAtWorkWhatElse</author>
	<datestamp>1264000800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Speaking of Pocahontas:</p><p><a href="http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2010/01/james-camerons-avatar-disneys-pocahontas" title="uproxx.com" rel="nofollow">http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2010/01/james-camerons-avatar-disneys-pocahontas</a> [uproxx.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Speaking of Pocahontas : http : //filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2010/01/james-camerons-avatar-disneys-pocahontas [ uproxx.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Speaking of Pocahontas:http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2010/01/james-camerons-avatar-disneys-pocahontas [uproxx.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826724</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263906900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've seen animals with horrid teeth.  I've seen dogs and cats who don't get dental care get abscesses, dental calcification, gum disease, etc. after a number of years.  A lot of wild animals don't live that long, so they don't have time to get dental issues.</p><p>Primitive tribes also don't have perfectly straight teeth, as done by an orthodontist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen animals with horrid teeth .
I 've seen dogs and cats who do n't get dental care get abscesses , dental calcification , gum disease , etc .
after a number of years .
A lot of wild animals do n't live that long , so they do n't have time to get dental issues.Primitive tribes also do n't have perfectly straight teeth , as done by an orthodontist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen animals with horrid teeth.
I've seen dogs and cats who don't get dental care get abscesses, dental calcification, gum disease, etc.
after a number of years.
A lot of wild animals don't live that long, so they don't have time to get dental issues.Primitive tribes also don't have perfectly straight teeth, as done by an orthodontist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828776</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, c'mon!</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1263926760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Look. I can not hold a grudge against any man who takes pride and preference in his own; family, kind, nation, company or foot ball team.</p></div><p>A <em>man</em>? Oh, absolutely. So long as said man keeps his preferences to himself, and doesn't try to shove them onto others (who take pride in their own, possibly very different, preferences)!</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Guys, this really isn't a time to try to bash the commie here. China had these cultural integrity programs in place for a long time.</p></div><p>And they suck, and so long as they are in place, it's worth "bashing the commie" over it - again and again, for as long as it takes.</p><p>Oh, while we're at it, Quebec language laws are just as evil, and those who keep voting in politicians that support them are halfway fascists. "Commies" don't have a monopoly on suppression of freedom, not by a long shot.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Who the hell am I to get angry because China decides not to show it's citizens something else?</p> </div><p>A free man who respects the freedom of others (even if they don't know they are supposed to have them, yet)?</p><p>The ironic thing is that you wrote this right after:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I mean seriously, it's so bad in America that Americans actually watch "Reality TV Shows"... god forbid they knock on their neighbors door and say "Hi, I'm Jack, how are you?".</p></div><p>And <em>here</em> was the proper time to ask, "Wwho the hell am I to tell the Americans what to do with their free time?".</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It's their decision</p></div><p>I believe you're confusing two groups of people, namely, "Chinese nation" and "Communist Party of China", here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look .
I can not hold a grudge against any man who takes pride and preference in his own ; family , kind , nation , company or foot ball team.A man ?
Oh , absolutely .
So long as said man keeps his preferences to himself , and does n't try to shove them onto others ( who take pride in their own , possibly very different , preferences ) ! Guys , this really is n't a time to try to bash the commie here .
China had these cultural integrity programs in place for a long time.And they suck , and so long as they are in place , it 's worth " bashing the commie " over it - again and again , for as long as it takes.Oh , while we 're at it , Quebec language laws are just as evil , and those who keep voting in politicians that support them are halfway fascists .
" Commies " do n't have a monopoly on suppression of freedom , not by a long shot.Who the hell am I to get angry because China decides not to show it 's citizens something else ?
A free man who respects the freedom of others ( even if they do n't know they are supposed to have them , yet ) ? The ironic thing is that you wrote this right after : I mean seriously , it 's so bad in America that Americans actually watch " Reality TV Shows " ... god forbid they knock on their neighbors door and say " Hi , I 'm Jack , how are you ?
" .And here was the proper time to ask , " Wwho the hell am I to tell the Americans what to do with their free time ?
" .It 's their decisionI believe you 're confusing two groups of people , namely , " Chinese nation " and " Communist Party of China " , here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look.
I can not hold a grudge against any man who takes pride and preference in his own; family, kind, nation, company or foot ball team.A man?
Oh, absolutely.
So long as said man keeps his preferences to himself, and doesn't try to shove them onto others (who take pride in their own, possibly very different, preferences)!Guys, this really isn't a time to try to bash the commie here.
China had these cultural integrity programs in place for a long time.And they suck, and so long as they are in place, it's worth "bashing the commie" over it - again and again, for as long as it takes.Oh, while we're at it, Quebec language laws are just as evil, and those who keep voting in politicians that support them are halfway fascists.
"Commies" don't have a monopoly on suppression of freedom, not by a long shot.Who the hell am I to get angry because China decides not to show it's citizens something else?
A free man who respects the freedom of others (even if they don't know they are supposed to have them, yet)?The ironic thing is that you wrote this right after:I mean seriously, it's so bad in America that Americans actually watch "Reality TV Shows"... god forbid they knock on their neighbors door and say "Hi, I'm Jack, how are you?
".And here was the proper time to ask, "Wwho the hell am I to tell the Americans what to do with their free time?
".It's their decisionI believe you're confusing two groups of people, namely, "Chinese nation" and "Communist Party of China", here.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964</id>
	<title>This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263902040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>My though was the same during the burst of "OMG, Avatar hates American and the Marines!!!!" sentiment.<br> <br>

Avatar is a fairly simplistic (but very well animated) tale of the good guys and the bad guys. Even if the direction hadn't been so heavy handed, the good guys would have been obviously in the right and the bad guys obviously in the wrong. One side was on the other's planet, busy machine-gunning them for their resources. They didn't even have a sincere-to-them-but-monstrous-in-retrospect motive along the "saving the heathens' souls" lines.<br> <br>

Given that, asserting that "OMG, Avatar hates China" or "OMG, Avatar hates America" is basically equivalent to saying "OMG, the policies of the national entity I support could plausibly be seen as being allegorically represented by the cartoonishly evil bad guys in this sci-fi movie!". Why would you admit something like that? Why not just say "Eh, nice pictures, should keep the kids happy, pity the plot was shallower than a wading pool" and keep conversation from drifting in unfortunate directions?</htmltext>
<tokenext>My though was the same during the burst of " OMG , Avatar hates American and the Marines ! ! ! !
" sentiment .
Avatar is a fairly simplistic ( but very well animated ) tale of the good guys and the bad guys .
Even if the direction had n't been so heavy handed , the good guys would have been obviously in the right and the bad guys obviously in the wrong .
One side was on the other 's planet , busy machine-gunning them for their resources .
They did n't even have a sincere-to-them-but-monstrous-in-retrospect motive along the " saving the heathens ' souls " lines .
Given that , asserting that " OMG , Avatar hates China " or " OMG , Avatar hates America " is basically equivalent to saying " OMG , the policies of the national entity I support could plausibly be seen as being allegorically represented by the cartoonishly evil bad guys in this sci-fi movie ! " .
Why would you admit something like that ?
Why not just say " Eh , nice pictures , should keep the kids happy , pity the plot was shallower than a wading pool " and keep conversation from drifting in unfortunate directions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My though was the same during the burst of "OMG, Avatar hates American and the Marines!!!!
" sentiment.
Avatar is a fairly simplistic (but very well animated) tale of the good guys and the bad guys.
Even if the direction hadn't been so heavy handed, the good guys would have been obviously in the right and the bad guys obviously in the wrong.
One side was on the other's planet, busy machine-gunning them for their resources.
They didn't even have a sincere-to-them-but-monstrous-in-retrospect motive along the "saving the heathens' souls" lines.
Given that, asserting that "OMG, Avatar hates China" or "OMG, Avatar hates America" is basically equivalent to saying "OMG, the policies of the national entity I support could plausibly be seen as being allegorically represented by the cartoonishly evil bad guys in this sci-fi movie!".
Why would you admit something like that?
Why not just say "Eh, nice pictures, should keep the kids happy, pity the plot was shallower than a wading pool" and keep conversation from drifting in unfortunate directions?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827578</id>
	<title>I went to the theater yesterday in Hangzhou China.</title>
	<author>tabeees</author>
	<datestamp>1263914220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yesterday(1/19) afternoon, UME theater, Hangzhou China.
I checked all the seats of afternoon today(1/20), for 3D version only a few seats are left- first row, corner...
While for 2D version, the whole afternoon, only 2 seats are booked.
Maybe this could be the reason.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yesterday ( 1/19 ) afternoon , UME theater , Hangzhou China .
I checked all the seats of afternoon today ( 1/20 ) , for 3D version only a few seats are left- first row , corner.. . While for 2D version , the whole afternoon , only 2 seats are booked .
Maybe this could be the reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yesterday(1/19) afternoon, UME theater, Hangzhou China.
I checked all the seats of afternoon today(1/20), for 3D version only a few seats are left- first row, corner...
While for 2D version, the whole afternoon, only 2 seats are booked.
Maybe this could be the reason.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828374</id>
	<title>Re:Violating their WTO obligations</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1263922080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>WTO will likely throw out CHina's challenge on the tires. China is constantly dumping their products on the west and getting caught at it. In the past, W allowed all that to slide, but Obama is more like EU and putting more and more tariffs on China's products.</htmltext>
<tokenext>WTO will likely throw out CHina 's challenge on the tires .
China is constantly dumping their products on the west and getting caught at it .
In the past , W allowed all that to slide , but Obama is more like EU and putting more and more tariffs on China 's products .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTO will likely throw out CHina's challenge on the tires.
China is constantly dumping their products on the west and getting caught at it.
In the past, W allowed all that to slide, but Obama is more like EU and putting more and more tariffs on China's products.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536</id>
	<title>Violating their WTO obligations</title>
	<author>sp3d2orbit</author>
	<datestamp>1263905400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When the Chinese became part of the WTO, they signed treaties stating:</p><p>"China will provide non-discriminatory treatment to all WTO Members. All foreign individuals and enterprises, including those not invested or registered in China, will be accorded treatment no less favourable than that accorded to enterprises in China with respect to the right to trade."  - <a href="http://www.wto.org/english/news\_e/pres01\_e/pr243\_e.htm" title="wto.org">WTO, 2001</a> [wto.org]</p><p>In other words, "all foreign enterprises will be treated the same as domestic enterprises in China".</p><p>By pulling Avatar in favor of domestic movies, limiting foreign films to 10 days run time, and limiting the number of screens available China is violating its commitments under the law. It would be like the US banning Chinese manufactured imports because those imports were too successful compared to domestic brands.</p><p>China needs to honor its commitments to free trade, or be kicked out of the WTO. Which, coincidentally, would make it legal for the US to ban their imports.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When the Chinese became part of the WTO , they signed treaties stating : " China will provide non-discriminatory treatment to all WTO Members .
All foreign individuals and enterprises , including those not invested or registered in China , will be accorded treatment no less favourable than that accorded to enterprises in China with respect to the right to trade .
" - WTO , 2001 [ wto.org ] In other words , " all foreign enterprises will be treated the same as domestic enterprises in China " .By pulling Avatar in favor of domestic movies , limiting foreign films to 10 days run time , and limiting the number of screens available China is violating its commitments under the law .
It would be like the US banning Chinese manufactured imports because those imports were too successful compared to domestic brands.China needs to honor its commitments to free trade , or be kicked out of the WTO .
Which , coincidentally , would make it legal for the US to ban their imports .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When the Chinese became part of the WTO, they signed treaties stating:"China will provide non-discriminatory treatment to all WTO Members.
All foreign individuals and enterprises, including those not invested or registered in China, will be accorded treatment no less favourable than that accorded to enterprises in China with respect to the right to trade.
"  - WTO, 2001 [wto.org]In other words, "all foreign enterprises will be treated the same as domestic enterprises in China".By pulling Avatar in favor of domestic movies, limiting foreign films to 10 days run time, and limiting the number of screens available China is violating its commitments under the law.
It would be like the US banning Chinese manufactured imports because those imports were too successful compared to domestic brands.China needs to honor its commitments to free trade, or be kicked out of the WTO.
Which, coincidentally, would make it legal for the US to ban their imports.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827454</id>
	<title>Re:Violating their WTO obligations</title>
	<author>bloodhawk</author>
	<datestamp>1263912900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In other words, "all foreign enterprises will be treated the same as domestic enterprises in China".</p></div><p>The US doesn't consistently abide by such rules why should china?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In other words , " all foreign enterprises will be treated the same as domestic enterprises in China " .The US does n't consistently abide by such rules why should china ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other words, "all foreign enterprises will be treated the same as domestic enterprises in China".The US doesn't consistently abide by such rules why should china?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829406</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263979980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can buy <i>alien</i> hunter/gatherers with perfect teeth - alien biology, maybe they don't have plaque.  The idea of aliens with humanlike teeth - and faces, and bodies - in the first place is harder to accept.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can buy alien hunter/gatherers with perfect teeth - alien biology , maybe they do n't have plaque .
The idea of aliens with humanlike teeth - and faces , and bodies - in the first place is harder to accept .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can buy alien hunter/gatherers with perfect teeth - alien biology, maybe they don't have plaque.
The idea of aliens with humanlike teeth - and faces, and bodies - in the first place is harder to accept.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826762</id>
	<title>Depends...</title>
	<author>denzacar</author>
	<datestamp>1263907140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are several versions of Confucius' teachings <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N66Wza1Ka-w#t=2m16s" title="youtube.com">available out there.</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are several versions of Confucius ' teachings available out there .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are several versions of Confucius' teachings available out there.
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827256</id>
	<title>Re:Violating their WTO obligations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263911040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The "china film group" is a business in itself with the rights to buy and show whatever films it likes. Avatar has actually run the standard length in cinemas in china that every other film is left to run, now they are pulling it for the next movie. What you now want is for movie studios the right to demand cinemas show only there films? hmmm sounds to me your the one that wants to impose a harsh discriminatory policy!

Incidently the US is one of the worst freetrade offenders in the world today, imposing tarriffs on goods and subsidies for local goods directly against many free trade agreements.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The " china film group " is a business in itself with the rights to buy and show whatever films it likes .
Avatar has actually run the standard length in cinemas in china that every other film is left to run , now they are pulling it for the next movie .
What you now want is for movie studios the right to demand cinemas show only there films ?
hmmm sounds to me your the one that wants to impose a harsh discriminatory policy !
Incidently the US is one of the worst freetrade offenders in the world today , imposing tarriffs on goods and subsidies for local goods directly against many free trade agreements .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "china film group" is a business in itself with the rights to buy and show whatever films it likes.
Avatar has actually run the standard length in cinemas in china that every other film is left to run, now they are pulling it for the next movie.
What you now want is for movie studios the right to demand cinemas show only there films?
hmmm sounds to me your the one that wants to impose a harsh discriminatory policy!
Incidently the US is one of the worst freetrade offenders in the world today, imposing tarriffs on goods and subsidies for local goods directly against many free trade agreements.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826574</id>
	<title>Perhaps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263905580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps they found unobtanium in 2D film rolls.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps they found unobtanium in 2D film rolls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps they found unobtanium in 2D film rolls.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826560</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>Rakarra</author>
	<datestamp>1263905520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Avatar is a fairly simplistic (but very well animated) tale of the good guys and the bad guys. Even if the direction hadn't been so heavy handed, the good guys would have been obviously in the right and the bad guys obviously in the wrong. One side was on the other's planet, busy machine-gunning them for their resources. They didn't even have a sincere-to-them-but-monstrous-in-retrospect motive along the "saving the heathens' souls" lines.</p></div><p>It started out being more sympathetic than it ended up. Specifically, the idea at the start of the movie was "if we give them enough of [something they want], they'll agree to relocate peacefully, we mine the minerals, everyone is happy." The Avatar program was started to find out what [something they want] was. So.. it started out positive and it turned into warfare when the Avatars figured out there really was nothing they could give the Na'vi so they would agree to move. So then the statement became: "If we give them enough of [bombing their asses], they'll agree to relocate." The military even started out in an almost-humane method: use tear gas to get the natives to leave the area while it was cleared. Then, no tree = no home = no reason for the natives to stick around.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Avatar is a fairly simplistic ( but very well animated ) tale of the good guys and the bad guys .
Even if the direction had n't been so heavy handed , the good guys would have been obviously in the right and the bad guys obviously in the wrong .
One side was on the other 's planet , busy machine-gunning them for their resources .
They did n't even have a sincere-to-them-but-monstrous-in-retrospect motive along the " saving the heathens ' souls " lines.It started out being more sympathetic than it ended up .
Specifically , the idea at the start of the movie was " if we give them enough of [ something they want ] , they 'll agree to relocate peacefully , we mine the minerals , everyone is happy .
" The Avatar program was started to find out what [ something they want ] was .
So.. it started out positive and it turned into warfare when the Avatars figured out there really was nothing they could give the Na'vi so they would agree to move .
So then the statement became : " If we give them enough of [ bombing their asses ] , they 'll agree to relocate .
" The military even started out in an almost-humane method : use tear gas to get the natives to leave the area while it was cleared .
Then , no tree = no home = no reason for the natives to stick around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Avatar is a fairly simplistic (but very well animated) tale of the good guys and the bad guys.
Even if the direction hadn't been so heavy handed, the good guys would have been obviously in the right and the bad guys obviously in the wrong.
One side was on the other's planet, busy machine-gunning them for their resources.
They didn't even have a sincere-to-them-but-monstrous-in-retrospect motive along the "saving the heathens' souls" lines.It started out being more sympathetic than it ended up.
Specifically, the idea at the start of the movie was "if we give them enough of [something they want], they'll agree to relocate peacefully, we mine the minerals, everyone is happy.
" The Avatar program was started to find out what [something they want] was.
So.. it started out positive and it turned into warfare when the Avatars figured out there really was nothing they could give the Na'vi so they would agree to move.
So then the statement became: "If we give them enough of [bombing their asses], they'll agree to relocate.
" The military even started out in an almost-humane method: use tear gas to get the natives to leave the area while it was cleared.
Then, no tree = no home = no reason for the natives to stick around.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827734</id>
	<title>Re:Error</title>
	<author>ari\_j</author>
	<datestamp>1263915780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The shocking thing isn't that the editors edited your submission to contain the wrong link.  The shocking thing is that they edited a submission at all.  It's a start.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The shocking thing is n't that the editors edited your submission to contain the wrong link .
The shocking thing is that they edited a submission at all .
It 's a start .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The shocking thing isn't that the editors edited your submission to contain the wrong link.
The shocking thing is that they edited a submission at all.
It's a start.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828494</id>
	<title>Avatar == Pocahontas</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263923280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/SuperChargedShenanigans/news/?a=12734" title="comicbookmovie.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/SuperChargedShenanigans/news/?a=12734</a> [comicbookmovie.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/SuperChargedShenanigans/news/ ? a = 12734 [ comicbookmovie.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/SuperChargedShenanigans/news/?a=12734 [comicbookmovie.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826060</id>
	<title>WTF???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263902580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Chow-Yun Fat as Confucius?  I don't recall Confucius firing away round after round against Ye Old Bad Guy or running someone through with a sword.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chow-Yun Fat as Confucius ?
I do n't recall Confucius firing away round after round against Ye Old Bad Guy or running someone through with a sword .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chow-Yun Fat as Confucius?
I don't recall Confucius firing away round after round against Ye Old Bad Guy or running someone through with a sword.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825846</id>
	<title>Error</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263901500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It might be wise for editors to check the link before placing a story - just a suggestion of course.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It might be wise for editors to check the link before placing a story - just a suggestion of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It might be wise for editors to check the link before placing a story - just a suggestion of course.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827314</id>
	<title>Re:Violating their WTO obligations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263911580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> It would be like the US banning Chinese manufactured imports because those imports were too successful compared to domestic brands.</p></div><p>funny you should mention that as the US is currently under investigation by the WTO for doing exactly that (currently I think it is tires, has been various food products and other goods in the past). So I gather you are in full support of the US being kicked out of the WTO and sanctioned being raised by every government against the US too?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be like the US banning Chinese manufactured imports because those imports were too successful compared to domestic brands.funny you should mention that as the US is currently under investigation by the WTO for doing exactly that ( currently I think it is tires , has been various food products and other goods in the past ) .
So I gather you are in full support of the US being kicked out of the WTO and sanctioned being raised by every government against the US too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It would be like the US banning Chinese manufactured imports because those imports were too successful compared to domestic brands.funny you should mention that as the US is currently under investigation by the WTO for doing exactly that (currently I think it is tires, has been various food products and other goods in the past).
So I gather you are in full support of the US being kicked out of the WTO and sanctioned being raised by every government against the US too?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825986</id>
	<title>Puzzling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263902160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The 2D version is "too provocative in its anti-authoritarian message" and draws "attention to the sensitive issue of forced evictions" but the 3D and IMAX versions are ok? And censors realized it one week after they approved the movie and a lot of people already watched it? I'm puzzled.
Instead could that be a not-too-harsh message to the USA and the world after last week Google affair?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The 2D version is " too provocative in its anti-authoritarian message " and draws " attention to the sensitive issue of forced evictions " but the 3D and IMAX versions are ok ?
And censors realized it one week after they approved the movie and a lot of people already watched it ?
I 'm puzzled .
Instead could that be a not-too-harsh message to the USA and the world after last week Google affair ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 2D version is "too provocative in its anti-authoritarian message" and draws "attention to the sensitive issue of forced evictions" but the 3D and IMAX versions are ok?
And censors realized it one week after they approved the movie and a lot of people already watched it?
I'm puzzled.
Instead could that be a not-too-harsh message to the USA and the world after last week Google affair?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826990</id>
	<title>This didn't happen online</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263908820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Posting stuff like this in YRO has always drug Slashdot down.  It's interesting, but not online.  It should get throw into one of the fluff categories.  Your rights online used to be about your rights online.  Don't give me any of this, "No, it's 'your rights, online'" bull.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Posting stuff like this in YRO has always drug Slashdot down .
It 's interesting , but not online .
It should get throw into one of the fluff categories .
Your rights online used to be about your rights online .
Do n't give me any of this , " No , it 's 'your rights , online ' " bull .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Posting stuff like this in YRO has always drug Slashdot down.
It's interesting, but not online.
It should get throw into one of the fluff categories.
Your rights online used to be about your rights online.
Don't give me any of this, "No, it's 'your rights, online'" bull.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826558</id>
	<title>Re:This seems stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263905520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>To me, I was more puzzled by how a race of hunter/gatherers have absolutely perfect teeth to a person,</p></div><p>That's a very odd thing to be puzzled about. Presumably, being in harmony with nature, they have a very good diet and look after their bodies. Do you also wonder why animals have such good teeth, even though they don't have toothbrushes?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To me , I was more puzzled by how a race of hunter/gatherers have absolutely perfect teeth to a person,That 's a very odd thing to be puzzled about .
Presumably , being in harmony with nature , they have a very good diet and look after their bodies .
Do you also wonder why animals have such good teeth , even though they do n't have toothbrushes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To me, I was more puzzled by how a race of hunter/gatherers have absolutely perfect teeth to a person,That's a very odd thing to be puzzled about.
Presumably, being in harmony with nature, they have a very good diet and look after their bodies.
Do you also wonder why animals have such good teeth, even though they don't have toothbrushes?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30831076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30830692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30830318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30831418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30853570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30830448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30839570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30830410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30839058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_2241229_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_2241229.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30839058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829244
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826396
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30830692
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828138
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30839570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826392
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827266
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827526
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827116
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828054
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828716
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827406
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827104
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30830448
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827468
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_2241229.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826286
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827734
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828280
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_2241229.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_2241229.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826520
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826644
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_2241229.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826152
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827518
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828242
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30831418
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30830410
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827288
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827148
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829346
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827118
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827014
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826454
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827032
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827144
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829220
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828476
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826558
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30831076
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826724
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829406
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826154
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827214
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_2241229.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826202
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30853570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826238
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_2241229.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30829476
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_2241229.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826530
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_2241229.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30825896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_2241229.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827256
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30830318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827314
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828374
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_2241229.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828106
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_2241229.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827822
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_2241229.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_2241229.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30826470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30827294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_2241229.30828776
</commentlist>
</conversation>
