<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_18_1742230</id>
	<title>Nano-Scale Robot Arm Moves Atoms With 100\% Accuracy</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1263842640000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>destinyland writes <i>"A New York professor has built a <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/articles/nano/nanoscale-robot-arm-places-atoms-and-molecules-100-accuracy">two-armed nanorobotic device</a> with the ability to place specific atoms and molecules where scientists want them. The nano-scopic device is just 150 x 50 x 8 nanometers in size &mdash; over a million could fit inside a single red blood cell. But because of its size, it's able to build nanoscale structures and machines &mdash; including a nanoscale walking biped and even sequence-dependent molecular switch arrays!"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>destinyland writes " A New York professor has built a two-armed nanorobotic device with the ability to place specific atoms and molecules where scientists want them .
The nano-scopic device is just 150 x 50 x 8 nanometers in size    over a million could fit inside a single red blood cell .
But because of its size , it 's able to build nanoscale structures and machines    including a nanoscale walking biped and even sequence-dependent molecular switch arrays !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>destinyland writes "A New York professor has built a two-armed nanorobotic device with the ability to place specific atoms and molecules where scientists want them.
The nano-scopic device is just 150 x 50 x 8 nanometers in size — over a million could fit inside a single red blood cell.
But because of its size, it's able to build nanoscale structures and machines — including a nanoscale walking biped and even sequence-dependent molecular switch arrays!
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815310</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>ZaphDingbat</author>
	<datestamp>1263826620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Diamond manufacturing is already possible. The synthetic stuff is way cheaper than the stuff the cartels sell.</p><p>Their reaction? Build better detector machines that can find the flaws present in a "natural" diamond vs. a synthetic one to tell whether it's worth anything. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic\_diamond</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Diamond manufacturing is already possible .
The synthetic stuff is way cheaper than the stuff the cartels sell.Their reaction ?
Build better detector machines that can find the flaws present in a " natural " diamond vs. a synthetic one to tell whether it 's worth anything .
See http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic \ _diamond</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Diamond manufacturing is already possible.
The synthetic stuff is way cheaper than the stuff the cartels sell.Their reaction?
Build better detector machines that can find the flaws present in a "natural" diamond vs. a synthetic one to tell whether it's worth anything.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic\_diamond</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813752</id>
	<title>Re:d'oh.</title>
	<author>Dilligent</author>
	<datestamp>1263815040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>over a million could fit inside a single red blood cell.</p></div><p>And it's just a matter of time until someone does. Let's hope by then software engineering will be in a better state than it is now, or we may be scrambling to kill artificial viruses along with the real ones. As if the world wasn't deadly enough...</p></div><p>Look at the size of that thing, do you really believe it is possible to come up with a program that is complex enough such as that it won't be testable beforehand and still make it fit? Consider that it still needs most of its parts to actually carry out any useful original pupose...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>over a million could fit inside a single red blood cell.And it 's just a matter of time until someone does .
Let 's hope by then software engineering will be in a better state than it is now , or we may be scrambling to kill artificial viruses along with the real ones .
As if the world was n't deadly enough...Look at the size of that thing , do you really believe it is possible to come up with a program that is complex enough such as that it wo n't be testable beforehand and still make it fit ?
Consider that it still needs most of its parts to actually carry out any useful original pupose.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>over a million could fit inside a single red blood cell.And it's just a matter of time until someone does.
Let's hope by then software engineering will be in a better state than it is now, or we may be scrambling to kill artificial viruses along with the real ones.
As if the world wasn't deadly enough...Look at the size of that thing, do you really believe it is possible to come up with a program that is complex enough such as that it won't be testable beforehand and still make it fit?
Consider that it still needs most of its parts to actually carry out any useful original pupose...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812358</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>LuxMaker</author>
	<datestamp>1263808020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And when this technology matures it will be used not only to scrub CO2 but also in a eugenics program to scrub unwanted DNA sequences.  If you think it can't happen you are very naive and put too much faith into humanity as a whole.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And when this technology matures it will be used not only to scrub CO2 but also in a eugenics program to scrub unwanted DNA sequences .
If you think it ca n't happen you are very naive and put too much faith into humanity as a whole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And when this technology matures it will be used not only to scrub CO2 but also in a eugenics program to scrub unwanted DNA sequences.
If you think it can't happen you are very naive and put too much faith into humanity as a whole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30817104</id>
	<title>Exactly</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1263893400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm sorry, Jack but no amount of money will get Dennis Quaid inside me.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry , Jack but no amount of money will get Dennis Quaid inside me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry, Jack but no amount of money will get Dennis Quaid inside me.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812124</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263807060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In order to break the bonds, the assembler (disassembler?) would need to impart sufficient energy into them, in the form of momentum (technically heat, but at the scale of one atom it's easier to think about movement). The bonds are held in place because the shared electrons are in a lower energy state; as long as they have enough momentum they can reach "escape velocity" (yes, it's not velocity, but it's a good analogy) the atoms would separate.</p><p>IANAP, but I got As in quantum mechanics and chemistry<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In order to break the bonds , the assembler ( disassembler ?
) would need to impart sufficient energy into them , in the form of momentum ( technically heat , but at the scale of one atom it 's easier to think about movement ) .
The bonds are held in place because the shared electrons are in a lower energy state ; as long as they have enough momentum they can reach " escape velocity " ( yes , it 's not velocity , but it 's a good analogy ) the atoms would separate.IANAP , but I got As in quantum mechanics and chemistry : p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In order to break the bonds, the assembler (disassembler?
) would need to impart sufficient energy into them, in the form of momentum (technically heat, but at the scale of one atom it's easier to think about movement).
The bonds are held in place because the shared electrons are in a lower energy state; as long as they have enough momentum they can reach "escape velocity" (yes, it's not velocity, but it's a good analogy) the atoms would separate.IANAP, but I got As in quantum mechanics and chemistry :p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812984</id>
	<title>Re:DNA</title>
	<author>phaggood</author>
	<datestamp>1263811200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm thinking molecular assembly of any material from a 'soup' of atoms (or maybe solid block?).  Assembly-line alchemy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm thinking molecular assembly of any material from a 'soup ' of atoms ( or maybe solid block ? ) .
Assembly-line alchemy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm thinking molecular assembly of any material from a 'soup' of atoms (or maybe solid block?).
Assembly-line alchemy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813110</id>
	<title>Re:Question:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263811920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>already been done. you can make lab created gems including diamonds and including rarer coloured diamonds. they are strickly controled and according to the articles i've read you can get lab gems significantly cheaper then the real thing. -- the labs are bound to tagging them so you can tell they are lab made under a microscope.</p><p>seriously. google it.  i can't link from here or i would. Metals... i've heard nothing about that however.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>already been done .
you can make lab created gems including diamonds and including rarer coloured diamonds .
they are strickly controled and according to the articles i 've read you can get lab gems significantly cheaper then the real thing .
-- the labs are bound to tagging them so you can tell they are lab made under a microscope.seriously .
google it .
i ca n't link from here or i would .
Metals... i 've heard nothing about that however .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>already been done.
you can make lab created gems including diamonds and including rarer coloured diamonds.
they are strickly controled and according to the articles i've read you can get lab gems significantly cheaper then the real thing.
-- the labs are bound to tagging them so you can tell they are lab made under a microscope.seriously.
google it.
i can't link from here or i would.
Metals... i've heard nothing about that however.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812038</id>
	<title>Re:Exponential Growth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263806760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So, the first one builds a friend, then each builds a friend, and each of those builds a friend. Soon enough there will be millions, and they will be able to invade your blood cells!</p></div></blockquote><p>DON'T PANIC. They'll probably just be swallowed by a dog before we even realize they're attacking us.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the first one builds a friend , then each builds a friend , and each of those builds a friend .
Soon enough there will be millions , and they will be able to invade your blood cells ! DO N'T PANIC .
They 'll probably just be swallowed by a dog before we even realize they 're attacking us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the first one builds a friend, then each builds a friend, and each of those builds a friend.
Soon enough there will be millions, and they will be able to invade your blood cells!DON'T PANIC.
They'll probably just be swallowed by a dog before we even realize they're attacking us.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30822624</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>lewiscr</author>
	<datestamp>1263930720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can't cheat, but a catalyst can lower the energy requirements of the chemical reaction.  To me (software engineer), catalysts are magically alchemy ingredients; They work, but I don't know why.  Somebody that does understand the physic underneath the chemistry should be able to build a nanorobot to be a perfect catalyst for the single reaction you want.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't cheat , but a catalyst can lower the energy requirements of the chemical reaction .
To me ( software engineer ) , catalysts are magically alchemy ingredients ; They work , but I do n't know why .
Somebody that does understand the physic underneath the chemistry should be able to build a nanorobot to be a perfect catalyst for the single reaction you want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't cheat, but a catalyst can lower the energy requirements of the chemical reaction.
To me (software engineer), catalysts are magically alchemy ingredients; They work, but I don't know why.
Somebody that does understand the physic underneath the chemistry should be able to build a nanorobot to be a perfect catalyst for the single reaction you want.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30819306</id>
	<title>Wow, this might be a bgood thing</title>
	<author>VirtualJWN</author>
	<datestamp>1263917160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you could set up these little buggers to find the bacteria that causes cancer and kill it, wow, that would be cool.

Also would be great for repairing damaged tissue (ACL or other injuries) without conventional surgery.

These things could rewrite DNA, therefore, potentially turn the "bad genes off" which will cause disease down the road.

Also, could use them to rebuld the skin cells subcutaneously, and increase collagen without "Botox".

You could also use these things to create essentially what "wolverine" is in Marvel Comics (now Disney).  Reorganize the materials already present in bone and connective tissue in such a way as to make it stronger, perhaps by incorporating other synthetic materials or metal into the bone itself.

I could also see applications for microsurgery int he brain where neurons are damaged, or perhaps even those with Parkinsons, Alzheimers, maybe even M.S.

Obviously the fact that these can be assembled is great, it is the programming and or the learnign ability of the individual or collective nanobots that is most significant.

Depending on the source of power, heat, bioelectricity, or whatever, these things could remain in the body indefinitely, continuously repairing cells and DNA.

Anything from Radiation poisoning, to Mesothelioma (from Asbestos or other irritants in the Lungs) could be treated with these things.

Optimization of silicon crystals to provide near perfect and higher yield semi conductors,

On the other hand, they could be used for other purposes as well, perhaps not so positive.

Restructuring of nuclear material on an atomic level to improve purity.

Creation of Adaptive Molecular explosives in which the nanobots reconfigure a "harmless substance" into something with more lethality.  This would be tough to detect).

It would be hard to environmentally filter these little rascals too.  At roughly atomic size, the filtration would have to be very much improved to "Catch them".

The implications for purification of chemical (at least organic) substances are pretty interesting as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you could set up these little buggers to find the bacteria that causes cancer and kill it , wow , that would be cool .
Also would be great for repairing damaged tissue ( ACL or other injuries ) without conventional surgery .
These things could rewrite DNA , therefore , potentially turn the " bad genes off " which will cause disease down the road .
Also , could use them to rebuld the skin cells subcutaneously , and increase collagen without " Botox " .
You could also use these things to create essentially what " wolverine " is in Marvel Comics ( now Disney ) .
Reorganize the materials already present in bone and connective tissue in such a way as to make it stronger , perhaps by incorporating other synthetic materials or metal into the bone itself .
I could also see applications for microsurgery int he brain where neurons are damaged , or perhaps even those with Parkinsons , Alzheimers , maybe even M.S .
Obviously the fact that these can be assembled is great , it is the programming and or the learnign ability of the individual or collective nanobots that is most significant .
Depending on the source of power , heat , bioelectricity , or whatever , these things could remain in the body indefinitely , continuously repairing cells and DNA .
Anything from Radiation poisoning , to Mesothelioma ( from Asbestos or other irritants in the Lungs ) could be treated with these things .
Optimization of silicon crystals to provide near perfect and higher yield semi conductors , On the other hand , they could be used for other purposes as well , perhaps not so positive .
Restructuring of nuclear material on an atomic level to improve purity .
Creation of Adaptive Molecular explosives in which the nanobots reconfigure a " harmless substance " into something with more lethality .
This would be tough to detect ) .
It would be hard to environmentally filter these little rascals too .
At roughly atomic size , the filtration would have to be very much improved to " Catch them " .
The implications for purification of chemical ( at least organic ) substances are pretty interesting as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you could set up these little buggers to find the bacteria that causes cancer and kill it, wow, that would be cool.
Also would be great for repairing damaged tissue (ACL or other injuries) without conventional surgery.
These things could rewrite DNA, therefore, potentially turn the "bad genes off" which will cause disease down the road.
Also, could use them to rebuld the skin cells subcutaneously, and increase collagen without "Botox".
You could also use these things to create essentially what "wolverine" is in Marvel Comics (now Disney).
Reorganize the materials already present in bone and connective tissue in such a way as to make it stronger, perhaps by incorporating other synthetic materials or metal into the bone itself.
I could also see applications for microsurgery int he brain where neurons are damaged, or perhaps even those with Parkinsons, Alzheimers, maybe even M.S.
Obviously the fact that these can be assembled is great, it is the programming and or the learnign ability of the individual or collective nanobots that is most significant.
Depending on the source of power, heat, bioelectricity, or whatever, these things could remain in the body indefinitely, continuously repairing cells and DNA.
Anything from Radiation poisoning, to Mesothelioma (from Asbestos or other irritants in the Lungs) could be treated with these things.
Optimization of silicon crystals to provide near perfect and higher yield semi conductors,

On the other hand, they could be used for other purposes as well, perhaps not so positive.
Restructuring of nuclear material on an atomic level to improve purity.
Creation of Adaptive Molecular explosives in which the nanobots reconfigure a "harmless substance" into something with more lethality.
This would be tough to detect).
It would be hard to environmentally filter these little rascals too.
At roughly atomic size, the filtration would have to be very much improved to "Catch them".
The implications for purification of chemical (at least organic) substances are pretty interesting as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256</id>
	<title>Did we just break heisenberg's principle?</title>
	<author>Shadow of Eternity</author>
	<datestamp>1263846480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it can move and place particles with 100\% accuracy then at least at some point we know both where it is and how fast it's moving...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it can move and place particles with 100 \ % accuracy then at least at some point we know both where it is and how fast it 's moving.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it can move and place particles with 100\% accuracy then at least at some point we know both where it is and how fast it's moving...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812290</id>
	<title>Re:Question:</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1263807720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>no, they can't make gold, because they don't move elementary particles, they move atoms. gold is an atom, hence they'd need gold to make gold, which isn't a very impressive feat. what would be cool is if they could take simple graphite (pencil lead), and assemble it into diamonds, and make the whole process significantly cheaper than diamonds are today. it could be a real game-changer, and i'd really enjoy seeing diamonds that now cost millions of dollars lose almost all their value, thus screwing over anyone who has made large investments into diamond jewelery. something like this happened with aluminium - it used to be a very expensive metal, because it was difficult to extract it from the ore, so there was a lot of aluminium jewelery. then some guy came up with a new way to extract it, and it became the cheap-ass metal we all know and love today.</htmltext>
<tokenext>no , they ca n't make gold , because they do n't move elementary particles , they move atoms .
gold is an atom , hence they 'd need gold to make gold , which is n't a very impressive feat .
what would be cool is if they could take simple graphite ( pencil lead ) , and assemble it into diamonds , and make the whole process significantly cheaper than diamonds are today .
it could be a real game-changer , and i 'd really enjoy seeing diamonds that now cost millions of dollars lose almost all their value , thus screwing over anyone who has made large investments into diamond jewelery .
something like this happened with aluminium - it used to be a very expensive metal , because it was difficult to extract it from the ore , so there was a lot of aluminium jewelery .
then some guy came up with a new way to extract it , and it became the cheap-ass metal we all know and love today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no, they can't make gold, because they don't move elementary particles, they move atoms.
gold is an atom, hence they'd need gold to make gold, which isn't a very impressive feat.
what would be cool is if they could take simple graphite (pencil lead), and assemble it into diamonds, and make the whole process significantly cheaper than diamonds are today.
it could be a real game-changer, and i'd really enjoy seeing diamonds that now cost millions of dollars lose almost all their value, thus screwing over anyone who has made large investments into diamond jewelery.
something like this happened with aluminium - it used to be a very expensive metal, because it was difficult to extract it from the ore, so there was a lot of aluminium jewelery.
then some guy came up with a new way to extract it, and it became the cheap-ass metal we all know and love today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811844</id>
	<title>To paraphrase an old chestnut..</title>
	<author>goldaryn</author>
	<datestamp>1263805800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>a two-armed nanorobotic device with the ability to place specific atoms and molecules where scientists want them</b> <br>
<br>
yes, but where the scientists want them and where the scientists have told its programs to put them are two different things!</htmltext>
<tokenext>a two-armed nanorobotic device with the ability to place specific atoms and molecules where scientists want them yes , but where the scientists want them and where the scientists have told its programs to put them are two different things !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a two-armed nanorobotic device with the ability to place specific atoms and molecules where scientists want them 

yes, but where the scientists want them and where the scientists have told its programs to put them are two different things!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246</id>
	<title>Exponential Growth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263846420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, the first one builds a friend, then each builds a friend, and each of those builds a friend. Soon enough there will be millions, and they will be able to invade your blood cells!</p><p>I for one welcome our nano sized robot overlords</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the first one builds a friend , then each builds a friend , and each of those builds a friend .
Soon enough there will be millions , and they will be able to invade your blood cells ! I for one welcome our nano sized robot overlords</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the first one builds a friend, then each builds a friend, and each of those builds a friend.
Soon enough there will be millions, and they will be able to invade your blood cells!I for one welcome our nano sized robot overlords</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811872</id>
	<title>Re:Did we just break heisenberg's principle?</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1263805920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, if that is what they mean, could we guarantee which isomer of a molecule we get? That could come in handy.</p><p>Or it'll result in stuff like Phentermine jumping up the ranks of Scheduled chemicals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , if that is what they mean , could we guarantee which isomer of a molecule we get ?
That could come in handy.Or it 'll result in stuff like Phentermine jumping up the ranks of Scheduled chemicals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, if that is what they mean, could we guarantee which isomer of a molecule we get?
That could come in handy.Or it'll result in stuff like Phentermine jumping up the ranks of Scheduled chemicals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662</id>
	<title>Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>cbiltcliffe</author>
	<datestamp>1263848220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know a heck of a lot about nanorobots and such, so I don't know whether it's possible or not, but if placing atoms with 100\% accuracy is possible, shouldn't it also be possible to \_remove\_ atoms with 100\% accuracy?</p><p>In that case, would it be possible to build something that disassembles atmospheric carbon dioxide, and build pencil lead and release oxygen in the process?</p><p>Of course, then you get into the problem of the energy stored in chemical bonds, and the energy required to overcome that.  I have no idea if/how that applies to nanoscale robots, since they're mechanically working on individual atoms, rather than a bulk chemical reaction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know a heck of a lot about nanorobots and such , so I do n't know whether it 's possible or not , but if placing atoms with 100 \ % accuracy is possible , should n't it also be possible to \ _remove \ _ atoms with 100 \ % accuracy ? In that case , would it be possible to build something that disassembles atmospheric carbon dioxide , and build pencil lead and release oxygen in the process ? Of course , then you get into the problem of the energy stored in chemical bonds , and the energy required to overcome that .
I have no idea if/how that applies to nanoscale robots , since they 're mechanically working on individual atoms , rather than a bulk chemical reaction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know a heck of a lot about nanorobots and such, so I don't know whether it's possible or not, but if placing atoms with 100\% accuracy is possible, shouldn't it also be possible to \_remove\_ atoms with 100\% accuracy?In that case, would it be possible to build something that disassembles atmospheric carbon dioxide, and build pencil lead and release oxygen in the process?Of course, then you get into the problem of the energy stored in chemical bonds, and the energy required to overcome that.
I have no idea if/how that applies to nanoscale robots, since they're mechanically working on individual atoms, rather than a bulk chemical reaction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811858</id>
	<title>Re:Question:</title>
	<author>derGoldstein</author>
	<datestamp>1263805860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who said anything about subatomic particles?...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who said anything about subatomic particles ? .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who said anything about subatomic particles?...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812280</id>
	<title>Oh, boy!</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1263807720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here comes the first wave attack of the replicators...lucky I am a close friend of Thor!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here comes the first wave attack of the replicators...lucky I am a close friend of Thor !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here comes the first wave attack of the replicators...lucky I am a close friend of Thor!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812818</id>
	<title>Re:Did we just break heisenberg's principle?</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1263810480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Note they said <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy\_and\_precision#Accuracy\_versus\_precision.3B\_the\_target\_analogy" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">accuracy, not precision</a> [wikipedia.org]. This just means that it moves them to the area specified, not that it moves them all to the same physical point in space.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Note they said accuracy , not precision [ wikipedia.org ] .
This just means that it moves them to the area specified , not that it moves them all to the same physical point in space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Note they said accuracy, not precision [wikipedia.org].
This just means that it moves them to the area specified, not that it moves them all to the same physical point in space.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815840</id>
	<title>Re:Exponential Growth</title>
	<author>seven of five</author>
	<datestamp>1263832620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://seemanlab4.chem.nyu.edu/devices.html" title="nyu.edu">Dr Nadrian Seeman</a> [nyu.edu] has been working with DNA as a nanomechanical framework for decades now. Using the well-known mechanical and electrostatic properties of DNA as a sort of erector set. I'm not too surprised he's furthered this work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dr Nadrian Seeman [ nyu.edu ] has been working with DNA as a nanomechanical framework for decades now .
Using the well-known mechanical and electrostatic properties of DNA as a sort of erector set .
I 'm not too surprised he 's furthered this work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dr Nadrian Seeman [nyu.edu] has been working with DNA as a nanomechanical framework for decades now.
Using the well-known mechanical and electrostatic properties of DNA as a sort of erector set.
I'm not too surprised he's furthered this work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811834</id>
	<title>Re:Did we just break heisenberg's principle?</title>
	<author>oldspewey</author>
	<datestamp>1263805800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No such luck<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... it doesn't work for cat particles.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No such luck ... it does n't work for cat particles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No such luck ... it doesn't work for cat particles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698</id>
	<title>Question:</title>
	<author>Progman3K</author>
	<datestamp>1263848340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can they make gold?</p><p>If they can place atoms with 100\% accuracy, could they not then assemble molecules into any chosen configuration?</p><p>When's the first test?</p><p>I suppose it would take a long time doing it one atom at a time, but as noted by Feynman, they could make other copies of themselves first and when there are enough of them they could start assembling the elements themselves...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can they make gold ? If they can place atoms with 100 \ % accuracy , could they not then assemble molecules into any chosen configuration ? When 's the first test ? I suppose it would take a long time doing it one atom at a time , but as noted by Feynman , they could make other copies of themselves first and when there are enough of them they could start assembling the elements themselves.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can they make gold?If they can place atoms with 100\% accuracy, could they not then assemble molecules into any chosen configuration?When's the first test?I suppose it would take a long time doing it one atom at a time, but as noted by Feynman, they could make other copies of themselves first and when there are enough of them they could start assembling the elements themselves...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812762</id>
	<title>Time for a test:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263810120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Tea, Earl Grey, hot."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Tea , Earl Grey , hot .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Tea, Earl Grey, hot.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811974</id>
	<title>Re:Did we just break heisenberg's principle?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263806340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>My girlfriend always moans at me in the car "Do you know how fast you are going?". To which I ALWAYS say "No, but I know exactly where I am".<br> <br>
"Why aren't we moving?" "I'm lost"<br> <br>
Bloody woman</htmltext>
<tokenext>My girlfriend always moans at me in the car " Do you know how fast you are going ? " .
To which I ALWAYS say " No , but I know exactly where I am " .
" Why are n't we moving ?
" " I 'm lost " Bloody woman</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My girlfriend always moans at me in the car "Do you know how fast you are going?".
To which I ALWAYS say "No, but I know exactly where I am".
"Why aren't we moving?
" "I'm lost" 
Bloody woman</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812188</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1263807360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>well, you can never cheat a molecule out of its potential energy, so of course this would still apply. however, maybe this method would be more energy-efficient that chemical methods of achieving the same thing, although i have no idea if this is the case or not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>well , you can never cheat a molecule out of its potential energy , so of course this would still apply .
however , maybe this method would be more energy-efficient that chemical methods of achieving the same thing , although i have no idea if this is the case or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well, you can never cheat a molecule out of its potential energy, so of course this would still apply.
however, maybe this method would be more energy-efficient that chemical methods of achieving the same thing, although i have no idea if this is the case or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814118</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>ShadowXOmega</author>
	<datestamp>1263817140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why not making carbon nanotubes? i think wll be useful...electronics, space elevators?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not making carbon nanotubes ?
i think wll be useful...electronics , space elevators ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not making carbon nanotubes?
i think wll be useful...electronics, space elevators?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30818900</id>
	<title>I hope he names it after himself</title>
	<author>Fdisk81</author>
	<datestamp>1263915120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want Doctors to tell patients in the future "We are going to pump you full of Seeman" with a straight face.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want Doctors to tell patients in the future " We are going to pump you full of Seeman " with a straight face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want Doctors to tell patients in the future "We are going to pump you full of Seeman" with a straight face.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811264</id>
	<title>Neal Stephenson would be pleased</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263846480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can we get a diamondage tag?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we get a diamondage tag ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we get a diamondage tag?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814448</id>
	<title>Re:Joke video</title>
	<author>WrongMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1263819420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Atomic Force Microscopes start in the range of $10,000, you could easily build one in your own basement. Electron Microscopes are more expensive, but still very common at labs doing this type of thing. Depending on what types of bonds are being formed, there's all types of spectroscopy that could be done. Really, verifying the results is just basic chemistry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Atomic Force Microscopes start in the range of $ 10,000 , you could easily build one in your own basement .
Electron Microscopes are more expensive , but still very common at labs doing this type of thing .
Depending on what types of bonds are being formed , there 's all types of spectroscopy that could be done .
Really , verifying the results is just basic chemistry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Atomic Force Microscopes start in the range of $10,000, you could easily build one in your own basement.
Electron Microscopes are more expensive, but still very common at labs doing this type of thing.
Depending on what types of bonds are being formed, there's all types of spectroscopy that could be done.
Really, verifying the results is just basic chemistry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815126</id>
	<title>Re:Question:</title>
	<author>Ungrounded Lightning</author>
	<datestamp>1263824460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Can they make HP ink?</i></p><p>Yes.</p><p>But they haven't figured out how to reset the chip in the ink cartridge to accept that it's been refilled.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can they make HP ink ? Yes.But they have n't figured out how to reset the chip in the ink cartridge to accept that it 's been refilled .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can they make HP ink?Yes.But they haven't figured out how to reset the chip in the ink cartridge to accept that it's been refilled.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811536</id>
	<title>Re:Science has triumphed once more!!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263847560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, you can cut down assembly time quite a bit by leaving out the extraneous, unnecessary bits.  Arms and legs, for example.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , you can cut down assembly time quite a bit by leaving out the extraneous , unnecessary bits .
Arms and legs , for example .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, you can cut down assembly time quite a bit by leaving out the extraneous, unnecessary bits.
Arms and legs, for example.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812312</id>
	<title>Re:Exponential Growth</title>
	<author>sourcerror</author>
	<datestamp>1263807840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've already let Jesus Christ in my heart, and now the nanorobots?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've already let Jesus Christ in my heart , and now the nanorobots ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've already let Jesus Christ in my heart, and now the nanorobots?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815296</id>
	<title>Re:Question:</title>
	<author>grouchomarxist</author>
	<datestamp>1263826560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>i'd really enjoy seeing diamonds that now cost millions of dollars lose almost all their value, thus screwing over anyone who has made large investments into diamond jewelery</p></div><p>for the most part this is the case now. diamonds by themselves have very little resale value. there are synthetic diamonds, but the whole diamond jewelry business is propped up by clever marketing campaigns and the (almost) invisible hand of De Beers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>i 'd really enjoy seeing diamonds that now cost millions of dollars lose almost all their value , thus screwing over anyone who has made large investments into diamond jeweleryfor the most part this is the case now .
diamonds by themselves have very little resale value .
there are synthetic diamonds , but the whole diamond jewelry business is propped up by clever marketing campaigns and the ( almost ) invisible hand of De Beers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i'd really enjoy seeing diamonds that now cost millions of dollars lose almost all their value, thus screwing over anyone who has made large investments into diamond jeweleryfor the most part this is the case now.
diamonds by themselves have very little resale value.
there are synthetic diamonds, but the whole diamond jewelry business is propped up by clever marketing campaigns and the (almost) invisible hand of De Beers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812838</id>
	<title>Exact placement is theoretically possible</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263810540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can know exactly where something is as long as you are completely uncertain about its momentum. So they can place something it an exact location just as long as they don't expect it to still be there when they come back for it. So either the submitter got the title completely wrong or they are in for a nasty surprise...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can know exactly where something is as long as you are completely uncertain about its momentum .
So they can place something it an exact location just as long as they do n't expect it to still be there when they come back for it .
So either the submitter got the title completely wrong or they are in for a nasty surprise.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can know exactly where something is as long as you are completely uncertain about its momentum.
So they can place something it an exact location just as long as they don't expect it to still be there when they come back for it.
So either the submitter got the title completely wrong or they are in for a nasty surprise...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813482</id>
	<title>Re:Did we just break heisenberg's principle?</title>
	<author>ikono</author>
	<datestamp>1263813660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>*INSERT NERD-GIRLFRIEND EXCLUSION JOKE HERE*
Oh, and improve the shitty caps filter. The capitalization above is NOT yelling ffs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>* INSERT NERD-GIRLFRIEND EXCLUSION JOKE HERE * Oh , and improve the shitty caps filter .
The capitalization above is NOT yelling ffs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*INSERT NERD-GIRLFRIEND EXCLUSION JOKE HERE*
Oh, and improve the shitty caps filter.
The capitalization above is NOT yelling ffs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815466</id>
	<title>TNG reference</title>
	<author>celle</author>
	<datestamp>1263828480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wesley, put those nannites back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wesley , put those nannites back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wesley, put those nannites back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812850</id>
	<title>Two scientists, one nanobot?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263810600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In a 2009 article in Nature Nanotechnology, Dr. Seeman shared the results of experiments performed by his lab,</p></div><p>So in the history books of the future, we can read: &ldquo;The first generation of our glorious overlords, were conceived with the power of the giant intelligent Seem&aelig;n. All hail the Hypnobot!&rdquo;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In a 2009 article in Nature Nanotechnology , Dr. Seeman shared the results of experiments performed by his lab,So in the history books of the future , we can read :    The first generation of our glorious overlords , were conceived with the power of the giant intelligent Seem   n .
All hail the Hypnobot !   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a 2009 article in Nature Nanotechnology, Dr. Seeman shared the results of experiments performed by his lab,So in the history books of the future, we can read: “The first generation of our glorious overlords, were conceived with the power of the giant intelligent Seemæn.
All hail the Hypnobot!”
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814844</id>
	<title>Re:Science has triumphed once more!!!!</title>
	<author>pitchpipe</author>
	<datestamp>1263822420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Man, that is some weird science!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , that is some weird science !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, that is some weird science!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811986</id>
	<title>Re:Exponential Growth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263806400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The researcher's name is Dr. Seeman.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The researcher 's name is Dr. Seeman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The researcher's name is Dr. Seeman.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813486</id>
	<title>Re:Did we just break heisenberg's principle?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263813720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep. You're a nerd. You don't even recognize when your imaginary girlfriend complains about bad sex.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep .
You 're a nerd .
You do n't even recognize when your imaginary girlfriend complains about bad sex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep.
You're a nerd.
You don't even recognize when your imaginary girlfriend complains about bad sex.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30818478</id>
	<title>Yeah, but just see the battery pack!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263912240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The nano-scopic device is just 150 x 50 x 8 nanometers in size</i></p><p>Unfortunately, it's powered by a car battery, which has a life of about 10 minutes before needing a 12 hour charge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The nano-scopic device is just 150 x 50 x 8 nanometers in sizeUnfortunately , it 's powered by a car battery , which has a life of about 10 minutes before needing a 12 hour charge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The nano-scopic device is just 150 x 50 x 8 nanometers in sizeUnfortunately, it's powered by a car battery, which has a life of about 10 minutes before needing a 12 hour charge.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811286</id>
	<title>DNA</title>
	<author>mxh83</author>
	<datestamp>1263846540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>does this mean someone can artificially alter their DNA using the nanobots?</htmltext>
<tokenext>does this mean someone can artificially alter their DNA using the nanobots ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>does this mean someone can artificially alter their DNA using the nanobots?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815124</id>
	<title>Re:Exponential Growth</title>
	<author>The Archon V2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1263824460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So, the first one builds a friend, then each builds a friend, and each of those builds a friend. Soon enough there will be millions, and they will be able to invade your blood cells!</p></div><p>I've got a clever plan to stop them. I treat my body poorly, so my blood cells and the rest of me will be in such bad shape that the invaders will be disgusted by the slum-like living conditions and leave. So while all you healthy people are dismantled by the Evil Nanobot Horde, they'll just leave me alone! I shall outlive all of you! Now hand me the phone, I'm gonna order some buckets of chicken.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the first one builds a friend , then each builds a friend , and each of those builds a friend .
Soon enough there will be millions , and they will be able to invade your blood cells ! I 've got a clever plan to stop them .
I treat my body poorly , so my blood cells and the rest of me will be in such bad shape that the invaders will be disgusted by the slum-like living conditions and leave .
So while all you healthy people are dismantled by the Evil Nanobot Horde , they 'll just leave me alone !
I shall outlive all of you !
Now hand me the phone , I 'm gon na order some buckets of chicken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the first one builds a friend, then each builds a friend, and each of those builds a friend.
Soon enough there will be millions, and they will be able to invade your blood cells!I've got a clever plan to stop them.
I treat my body poorly, so my blood cells and the rest of me will be in such bad shape that the invaders will be disgusted by the slum-like living conditions and leave.
So while all you healthy people are dismantled by the Evil Nanobot Horde, they'll just leave me alone!
I shall outlive all of you!
Now hand me the phone, I'm gonna order some buckets of chicken.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814378</id>
	<title>Re:Did we just break heisenberg's principle?</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1263818880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... you may have a point. The uncertainty principle says that in any given quantum state of a particle, the standard deviation of the position times that of the momentum cannot be smaller than half the Planck constant.</p><p>The Planck constant is 6.63 * 10^-34 Js, the mass of your average nucleotide is roughly 300 atomic masses, and its diameter is about 0.3 nm.</p><p>If you want the standard deviation to be no larger than the particle's own diameter, that means (planck constant / 2 / (0.3 nm * 300 atomic mass units) must give us the minimum deviation of the velocity.</p><p>Plugging that into Google comes out as over 2.2 meters per second, which is pretty fast for placing something accurately...  I have probably made a false assumption, though. I'm not actually a physicist, I just play one on Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... you may have a point .
The uncertainty principle says that in any given quantum state of a particle , the standard deviation of the position times that of the momentum can not be smaller than half the Planck constant.The Planck constant is 6.63 * 10 ^ -34 Js , the mass of your average nucleotide is roughly 300 atomic masses , and its diameter is about 0.3 nm.If you want the standard deviation to be no larger than the particle 's own diameter , that means ( planck constant / 2 / ( 0.3 nm * 300 atomic mass units ) must give us the minimum deviation of the velocity.Plugging that into Google comes out as over 2.2 meters per second , which is pretty fast for placing something accurately... I have probably made a false assumption , though .
I 'm not actually a physicist , I just play one on Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... you may have a point.
The uncertainty principle says that in any given quantum state of a particle, the standard deviation of the position times that of the momentum cannot be smaller than half the Planck constant.The Planck constant is 6.63 * 10^-34 Js, the mass of your average nucleotide is roughly 300 atomic masses, and its diameter is about 0.3 nm.If you want the standard deviation to be no larger than the particle's own diameter, that means (planck constant / 2 / (0.3 nm * 300 atomic mass units) must give us the minimum deviation of the velocity.Plugging that into Google comes out as over 2.2 meters per second, which is pretty fast for placing something accurately...  I have probably made a false assumption, though.
I'm not actually a physicist, I just play one on Slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812958</id>
	<title>Re:Science has triumphed once more!!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263811080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Your perfect woman wouldn't need to have arms or legs?</p><p>Assuming you're the typical immature online male, and this "perfect woman" is for purely sexual purposes, there are quite a few things that can't be done without arms or legs.</p></div><p>How would she cook and clean, and bring me my beer?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your perfect woman would n't need to have arms or legs ? Assuming you 're the typical immature online male , and this " perfect woman " is for purely sexual purposes , there are quite a few things that ca n't be done without arms or legs.How would she cook and clean , and bring me my beer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your perfect woman wouldn't need to have arms or legs?Assuming you're the typical immature online male, and this "perfect woman" is for purely sexual purposes, there are quite a few things that can't be done without arms or legs.How would she cook and clean, and bring me my beer?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812034</id>
	<title>You know what this means</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263806700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Costa Rica will now be able to smuggle unlimited amounts of sugar in bloodstream nanocubes!</p><p>Up next: drug trafficking nanocubes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Costa Rica will now be able to smuggle unlimited amounts of sugar in bloodstream nanocubes ! Up next : drug trafficking nanocubes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Costa Rica will now be able to smuggle unlimited amounts of sugar in bloodstream nanocubes!Up next: drug trafficking nanocubes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811534</id>
	<title>Re:Exponential Growth</title>
	<author>RealGrouchy</author>
	<datestamp>1263847500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Because they are nano sized would that not make them under lords?</p></div><p>Probably. It would take a beowulf cluster of them--at the very least--to be any real threat.</p><p>- RG&gt;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because they are nano sized would that not make them under lords ? Probably .
It would take a beowulf cluster of them--at the very least--to be any real threat.- RG &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because they are nano sized would that not make them under lords?Probably.
It would take a beowulf cluster of them--at the very least--to be any real threat.- RG&gt;
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30816470</id>
	<title>So, how many..</title>
	<author>cheros</author>
	<datestamp>1263841680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.. would you need to build a car?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. would you need to build a car ?
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. would you need to build a car?
:-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811918</id>
	<title>Re:Question:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263806100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>Can they make gold?</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>Gold?</p><p>Can they make HP ink?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can they make gold ?
Gold ? Can they make HP ink ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Can they make gold?
Gold?Can they make HP ink?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815436</id>
	<title>Re:Question:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263828180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are lots of companies that make "synthetic diamonds" for industrial applications, and a few that make them for use in jewelry as well (www.gemesis.com).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are lots of companies that make " synthetic diamonds " for industrial applications , and a few that make them for use in jewelry as well ( www.gemesis.com ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are lots of companies that make "synthetic diamonds" for industrial applications, and a few that make them for use in jewelry as well (www.gemesis.com).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813514</id>
	<title>No Grey Goo...</title>
	<author>tylorsan</author>
	<datestamp>1263813840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not a nanobot, but perhaps another tiny incremental step toward positionally controlled chemistry.  I can't get to the core Nature article, but it looks like they make a DNA tile cassette, which they can insert a variety of DNA tooltips into.  They probably get ~1-10 nm positional accuracy between tooltips.  Not precise enough or controlled enough to do diamond mechanosynthesis, but possibly an interesting route to bootstrapping into that kind of technology.  As per usual, the biggest problem is that DNA isn't particularly stiff, making it hard to apply the kinds of forces at picometer precision that seems necessary for the sci-fi nanotech visions.  Variations of this technology may prove useful in designing and building/folding artificial proteins or biomolecules.  With biomineralization, that might eventually provide the stiffness and strength necessary to start beating nature at this mechanosynthetic game.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not a nanobot , but perhaps another tiny incremental step toward positionally controlled chemistry .
I ca n't get to the core Nature article , but it looks like they make a DNA tile cassette , which they can insert a variety of DNA tooltips into .
They probably get ~ 1-10 nm positional accuracy between tooltips .
Not precise enough or controlled enough to do diamond mechanosynthesis , but possibly an interesting route to bootstrapping into that kind of technology .
As per usual , the biggest problem is that DNA is n't particularly stiff , making it hard to apply the kinds of forces at picometer precision that seems necessary for the sci-fi nanotech visions .
Variations of this technology may prove useful in designing and building/folding artificial proteins or biomolecules .
With biomineralization , that might eventually provide the stiffness and strength necessary to start beating nature at this mechanosynthetic game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not a nanobot, but perhaps another tiny incremental step toward positionally controlled chemistry.
I can't get to the core Nature article, but it looks like they make a DNA tile cassette, which they can insert a variety of DNA tooltips into.
They probably get ~1-10 nm positional accuracy between tooltips.
Not precise enough or controlled enough to do diamond mechanosynthesis, but possibly an interesting route to bootstrapping into that kind of technology.
As per usual, the biggest problem is that DNA isn't particularly stiff, making it hard to apply the kinds of forces at picometer precision that seems necessary for the sci-fi nanotech visions.
Variations of this technology may prove useful in designing and building/folding artificial proteins or biomolecules.
With biomineralization, that might eventually provide the stiffness and strength necessary to start beating nature at this mechanosynthetic game.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30826124</id>
	<title>Re:Science has triumphed once more!!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263902940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now it is possible to build the perfect woman! Of course, it'll take a few thousand years to get her fully assembled.</p></div><p>I think that most slashdotters have no choice but to wait.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now it is possible to build the perfect woman !
Of course , it 'll take a few thousand years to get her fully assembled.I think that most slashdotters have no choice but to wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now it is possible to build the perfect woman!
Of course, it'll take a few thousand years to get her fully assembled.I think that most slashdotters have no choice but to wait.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812326</id>
	<title>Slashdotted...</title>
	<author>jeffmeden</author>
	<datestamp>1263807900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is the server being powered by a tiny nanobot that responds to the on and off states of the transistors via direct manipulation?  Maybe the 'nanoscale walking biped' is powering the server by running on a nanoscale hamster wheel to generate electricity?  These are all questions I wouldn't have to post if only I could RTFA...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is the server being powered by a tiny nanobot that responds to the on and off states of the transistors via direct manipulation ?
Maybe the 'nanoscale walking biped ' is powering the server by running on a nanoscale hamster wheel to generate electricity ?
These are all questions I would n't have to post if only I could RTFA.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is the server being powered by a tiny nanobot that responds to the on and off states of the transistors via direct manipulation?
Maybe the 'nanoscale walking biped' is powering the server by running on a nanoscale hamster wheel to generate electricity?
These are all questions I wouldn't have to post if only I could RTFA...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30821032</id>
	<title>Re:Science has triumphed once more!!!!</title>
	<author>Doctor Faustus</author>
	<datestamp>1263924600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll keep the legs, thanks.  Although if I could get built-in high heels like Angelina Jolie in Beowulf...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll keep the legs , thanks .
Although if I could get built-in high heels like Angelina Jolie in Beowulf.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll keep the legs, thanks.
Although if I could get built-in high heels like Angelina Jolie in Beowulf...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812886</id>
	<title>Re:Exponential Growth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263810780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So, the first one builds a friend, then each builds a friend, and each of those builds a friend. Soon enough there will be millions, and they will be able to invade your blood cells!</p></div><p>You mean, like a bacterial or viral infection?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the first one builds a friend , then each builds a friend , and each of those builds a friend .
Soon enough there will be millions , and they will be able to invade your blood cells ! You mean , like a bacterial or viral infection ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the first one builds a friend, then each builds a friend, and each of those builds a friend.
Soon enough there will be millions, and they will be able to invade your blood cells!You mean, like a bacterial or viral infection?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812184</id>
	<title>Re:Question:</title>
	<author>DrVxD</author>
	<datestamp>1263807360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can they make gold?</p><p>If they can place atoms with 100\% accuracy, could they not then assemble molecules into any chosen configuration?</p></div><p>That wouldn't help you make gold, since gold is an atom, not a compound.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can they make gold ? If they can place atoms with 100 \ % accuracy , could they not then assemble molecules into any chosen configuration ? That would n't help you make gold , since gold is an atom , not a compound .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can they make gold?If they can place atoms with 100\% accuracy, could they not then assemble molecules into any chosen configuration?That wouldn't help you make gold, since gold is an atom, not a compound.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312</id>
	<title>Science has triumphed once more!!!!</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1263846600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now it is possible to build the perfect woman! Of course, it'll take a few thousand years to get her fully assembled.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now it is possible to build the perfect woman !
Of course , it 'll take a few thousand years to get her fully assembled .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now it is possible to build the perfect woman!
Of course, it'll take a few thousand years to get her fully assembled.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811402</id>
	<title>Re:Did we just break heisenberg's principle?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263847020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're right, so clearly they could not have meant that. I assumed they meant that the arm will place an atom so that it bonds in just the way you want. There is a tolerance in that, sort of like with throwing a basketball through a hoop. Many initial trajectories will result in a basket.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right , so clearly they could not have meant that .
I assumed they meant that the arm will place an atom so that it bonds in just the way you want .
There is a tolerance in that , sort of like with throwing a basketball through a hoop .
Many initial trajectories will result in a basket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right, so clearly they could not have meant that.
I assumed they meant that the arm will place an atom so that it bonds in just the way you want.
There is a tolerance in that, sort of like with throwing a basketball through a hoop.
Many initial trajectories will result in a basket.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811766</id>
	<title>Re:Science has triumphed once more!!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263805500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your perfect woman wouldn't need to have arms or legs?</p><p>Assuming you're the typical immature online male, and this "perfect woman" is for purely sexual purposes, there are quite a few things that can't be done without arms or legs.</p><p>Her on top, doggy, hand jobs, etc.</p><p>And if you're not a typical immature male, and you actually want a relationship with this "perfect woman," then you're pushing around an invalid strapped into a wheelchair, who you made that way by choice/laziness.</p><p>She may be the perfect woman, but you're as far from the perfect guy as could be imagined.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your perfect woman would n't need to have arms or legs ? Assuming you 're the typical immature online male , and this " perfect woman " is for purely sexual purposes , there are quite a few things that ca n't be done without arms or legs.Her on top , doggy , hand jobs , etc.And if you 're not a typical immature male , and you actually want a relationship with this " perfect woman , " then you 're pushing around an invalid strapped into a wheelchair , who you made that way by choice/laziness.She may be the perfect woman , but you 're as far from the perfect guy as could be imagined .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your perfect woman wouldn't need to have arms or legs?Assuming you're the typical immature online male, and this "perfect woman" is for purely sexual purposes, there are quite a few things that can't be done without arms or legs.Her on top, doggy, hand jobs, etc.And if you're not a typical immature male, and you actually want a relationship with this "perfect woman," then you're pushing around an invalid strapped into a wheelchair, who you made that way by choice/laziness.She may be the perfect woman, but you're as far from the perfect guy as could be imagined.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30817346</id>
	<title>Re:Science has triumphed once more!!!!</title>
	<author>shnull</author>
	<datestamp>1263896520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>well, in that case, what did evolution ever do for us ? only thousand years for a perfect woman ? IT's a BARGAIN !</htmltext>
<tokenext>well , in that case , what did evolution ever do for us ?
only thousand years for a perfect woman ?
IT 's a BARGAIN !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well, in that case, what did evolution ever do for us ?
only thousand years for a perfect woman ?
IT's a BARGAIN !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30817444</id>
	<title>A million robots fitting in a bloodcell, huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263897840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In soviet russia....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In soviet russia... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In soviet russia....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811284</id>
	<title>d'oh.</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1263846540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>over a million could fit inside a single red blood cell.</p></div><p>And it's just a matter of time until someone does. Let's hope by then software engineering will be in a better state than it is now, or we may be scrambling to kill artificial viruses along with the real ones. As if the world wasn't deadly enough...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>over a million could fit inside a single red blood cell.And it 's just a matter of time until someone does .
Let 's hope by then software engineering will be in a better state than it is now , or we may be scrambling to kill artificial viruses along with the real ones .
As if the world was n't deadly enough.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>over a million could fit inside a single red blood cell.And it's just a matter of time until someone does.
Let's hope by then software engineering will be in a better state than it is now, or we may be scrambling to kill artificial viruses along with the real ones.
As if the world wasn't deadly enough...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813524</id>
	<title>Did he really....</title>
	<author>Sneeze1066</author>
	<datestamp>1263813900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe I'm just cynical....but this thing is so small couldn't he could just be claiming he made it.<br> <br>

Professor - <i>"Ah ha! Look, I've created a two armed nano robot that can move atoms and molecules!"</i> <br>
Assistant - <i>"Huh? Where?"</i> <br>
Professor - <i>"Here see, right here....Aren't you looking?"</i> <br>
Assistant - <i>"Yeah I'm looking where you're pointing....but ahh.....I don't quite.....errr....?"</i> <br>
Professor - <i>"What? You don't WHAT!!??"</i> <br>
Assistant - <i>"Oh no you misunderstand...I meant...that's great....does it come in red?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I 'm just cynical....but this thing is so small could n't he could just be claiming he made it .
Professor - " Ah ha !
Look , I 've created a two armed nano robot that can move atoms and molecules !
" Assistant - " Huh ?
Where ? " Professor - " Here see , right here....Are n't you looking ?
" Assistant - " Yeah I 'm looking where you 're pointing....but ahh.....I do n't quite.....errr.... ?
" Professor - " What ?
You do n't WHAT ! ! ? ?
" Assistant - " Oh no you misunderstand...I meant...that 's great....does it come in red ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I'm just cynical....but this thing is so small couldn't he could just be claiming he made it.
Professor - "Ah ha!
Look, I've created a two armed nano robot that can move atoms and molecules!
" 
Assistant - "Huh?
Where?" 
Professor - "Here see, right here....Aren't you looking?
" 
Assistant - "Yeah I'm looking where you're pointing....but ahh.....I don't quite.....errr....?
" 
Professor - "What?
You don't WHAT!!??
" 
Assistant - "Oh no you misunderstand...I meant...that's great....does it come in red?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811416</id>
	<title>Re:Exponential Growth</title>
	<author>WhatDoIKnow</author>
	<datestamp>1263847080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You mean like in Cowboy Bebop the Movie?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean like in Cowboy Bebop the Movie ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean like in Cowboy Bebop the Movie?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811362</id>
	<title>Re:Exponential Growth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263846840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I for one welcome our nano sized robot overlords</p></div></blockquote><p>Because they are nano sized would that not make them under lords?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our nano sized robot overlordsBecause they are nano sized would that not make them under lords ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our nano sized robot overlordsBecause they are nano sized would that not make them under lords?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811260</id>
	<title>I, for one, welcome our new nanobot underlords</title>
	<author>billstewart</author>
	<datestamp>1263846480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>well somebody had to say it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>well somebody had to say it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well somebody had to say it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814796</id>
	<title>Hail to the King!</title>
	<author>MinisterPhobia</author>
	<datestamp>1263822120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I, for one, salute our new nanobot overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , salute our new nanobot overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, salute our new nanobot overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813954</id>
	<title>Re:Science has triumphed once more!!!!</title>
	<author>Tynin</author>
	<datestamp>1263816060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reminds me of the movie Boxing Helena. <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106471/" title="imdb.com">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106471/</a> [imdb.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of the movie Boxing Helena .
http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0106471/ [ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of the movie Boxing Helena.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106471/ [imdb.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812418</id>
	<title>Re:Exponential Growth</title>
	<author>LeadSongDog</author>
	<datestamp>1263808440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All of your atom are belong to us!</htmltext>
<tokenext>All of your atom are belong to us !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of your atom are belong to us!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811274</id>
	<title>Drexlerian universal assemblers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263846480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in 5...4...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in 5...4.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in 5...4...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811228</id>
	<title>+or-h</title>
	<author>HarryatRock</author>
	<datestamp>1263846360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>exactly?</htmltext>
<tokenext>exactly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>exactly?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30816316</id>
	<title>Re:Did we just break heisenberg's principle?</title>
	<author>penguinrecorder</author>
	<datestamp>1263839280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article didn't say anything about how fast it placed the molecules.

No uncertainty about position but 100\% uncertainty about velocity.

We're still okay.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article did n't say anything about how fast it placed the molecules .
No uncertainty about position but 100 \ % uncertainty about velocity .
We 're still okay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article didn't say anything about how fast it placed the molecules.
No uncertainty about position but 100\% uncertainty about velocity.
We're still okay.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812022</id>
	<title>Re:Exponential Growth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263806640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So, the first one builds a friend, then each builds a friend, and each of those builds a friend. Soon enough there will be millions...</p></div><p>Sounds like Amway.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the first one builds a friend , then each builds a friend , and each of those builds a friend .
Soon enough there will be millions...Sounds like Amway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the first one builds a friend, then each builds a friend, and each of those builds a friend.
Soon enough there will be millions...Sounds like Amway.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815700</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>bantab</author>
	<datestamp>1263831240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What a great idea! We could use these "nanorobots" to fix the carbon from carbon dioxide into something more reduced, like say, carbohydrates, using a series of activation energy reducing steps that rely on some kind of outside power - maybe even solar power. Then we could even store the reduced carbon so that we can oxidize it later if we need some energy. But we would have to protect our "nanorobots" from the elements, and give them a good environment for doing all of this work. Maybe since this would be a new "green" technology, we could call them green forms. Of course, that might be too simple.. what about in Greek, "chloroplasts." I like that better. I think you're really on to something!</htmltext>
<tokenext>What a great idea !
We could use these " nanorobots " to fix the carbon from carbon dioxide into something more reduced , like say , carbohydrates , using a series of activation energy reducing steps that rely on some kind of outside power - maybe even solar power .
Then we could even store the reduced carbon so that we can oxidize it later if we need some energy .
But we would have to protect our " nanorobots " from the elements , and give them a good environment for doing all of this work .
Maybe since this would be a new " green " technology , we could call them green forms .
Of course , that might be too simple.. what about in Greek , " chloroplasts .
" I like that better .
I think you 're really on to something !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a great idea!
We could use these "nanorobots" to fix the carbon from carbon dioxide into something more reduced, like say, carbohydrates, using a series of activation energy reducing steps that rely on some kind of outside power - maybe even solar power.
Then we could even store the reduced carbon so that we can oxidize it later if we need some energy.
But we would have to protect our "nanorobots" from the elements, and give them a good environment for doing all of this work.
Maybe since this would be a new "green" technology, we could call them green forms.
Of course, that might be too simple.. what about in Greek, "chloroplasts.
" I like that better.
I think you're really on to something!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812394</id>
	<title>Re:To paraphrase an old chestnut..</title>
	<author>newcastlejon</author>
	<datestamp>1263808260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where's an Igor when you need one?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's an Igor when you need one ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's an Igor when you need one?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30817014</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>MrMr</author>
	<datestamp>1263892320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, the system in question is know as 'plant'. Runs on solar power as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , the system in question is know as 'plant' .
Runs on solar power as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, the system in question is know as 'plant'.
Runs on solar power as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811348</id>
	<title>Re:Did we just break heisenberg's principle?</title>
	<author>caerwyn</author>
	<datestamp>1263846780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Atoms are large enough that something like this can work despite the required uncertainties in both position and velocity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Atoms are large enough that something like this can work despite the required uncertainties in both position and velocity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Atoms are large enough that something like this can work despite the required uncertainties in both position and velocity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813204</id>
	<title>Gigantic funding...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263812280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... for midget research?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... for midget research ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... for midget research?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30817588</id>
	<title>Damn editors.</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1263900480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I did the unthinkable and read the fine article. Turns out that this machine hasn't build the biped and the switch arrays, the bloke did it, using the same tech he used to build this robot.<br><br>Nothing whatsoever in the article about what the robot has managed to do, except move and place individual atoms.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did the unthinkable and read the fine article .
Turns out that this machine has n't build the biped and the switch arrays , the bloke did it , using the same tech he used to build this robot.Nothing whatsoever in the article about what the robot has managed to do , except move and place individual atoms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did the unthinkable and read the fine article.
Turns out that this machine hasn't build the biped and the switch arrays, the bloke did it, using the same tech he used to build this robot.Nothing whatsoever in the article about what the robot has managed to do, except move and place individual atoms.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814920</id>
	<title>Re:Question:</title>
	<author>dissy</author>
	<datestamp>1263823020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can they make gold?</p></div><p>Given a bunch of gold atoms, the arms can make a larger shape of gold out of them, yes.</p><p>We can do that today too, in our crude large macro scale ways.<br>Just take some gold, melt it down to liquid form, and fill a mold.</p><p>That wouldn't be atomically accurate of course.</p><p>Any structure of gold you want that needs to be atomically accurate, you will still need to supply the arms with gold atoms to move around and position.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can they make gold ? Given a bunch of gold atoms , the arms can make a larger shape of gold out of them , yes.We can do that today too , in our crude large macro scale ways.Just take some gold , melt it down to liquid form , and fill a mold.That would n't be atomically accurate of course.Any structure of gold you want that needs to be atomically accurate , you will still need to supply the arms with gold atoms to move around and position .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can they make gold?Given a bunch of gold atoms, the arms can make a larger shape of gold out of them, yes.We can do that today too, in our crude large macro scale ways.Just take some gold, melt it down to liquid form, and fill a mold.That wouldn't be atomically accurate of course.Any structure of gold you want that needs to be atomically accurate, you will still need to supply the arms with gold atoms to move around and position.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814442</id>
	<title>Re:Question:</title>
	<author>Thing 1</author>
	<datestamp>1263819360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>something like this happened with aluminium - it used to be a very expensive metal, because it was difficult to extract it from the ore, so there was a lot of aluminium jewelery. then some guy came up with a new way to extract it, and it became the cheap-ass metal we all know and love today.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>A little OT, but aluminum is not loved in <b>my</b> household; it is a toxic poison.  Replace aluminum cookware with stainless steel, and buy your beer in bottles, not cans.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>something like this happened with aluminium - it used to be a very expensive metal , because it was difficult to extract it from the ore , so there was a lot of aluminium jewelery .
then some guy came up with a new way to extract it , and it became the cheap-ass metal we all know and love today .
A little OT , but aluminum is not loved in my household ; it is a toxic poison .
Replace aluminum cookware with stainless steel , and buy your beer in bottles , not cans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>something like this happened with aluminium - it used to be a very expensive metal, because it was difficult to extract it from the ore, so there was a lot of aluminium jewelery.
then some guy came up with a new way to extract it, and it became the cheap-ass metal we all know and love today.
A little OT, but aluminum is not loved in my household; it is a toxic poison.
Replace aluminum cookware with stainless steel, and buy your beer in bottles, not cans.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811272</id>
	<title>Invisible Robotic Overlords!</title>
	<author>jamesivie</author>
	<datestamp>1263846480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But can it seek out raw materials and make copies of itself?  THAT would be cool!  Welcome to our new nanosize robotic overlords!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But can it seek out raw materials and make copies of itself ?
THAT would be cool !
Welcome to our new nanosize robotic overlords !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But can it seek out raw materials and make copies of itself?
THAT would be cool!
Welcome to our new nanosize robotic overlords!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30816990</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263891960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have more faith in humanity than I do in your paranoia.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have more faith in humanity than I do in your paranoia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have more faith in humanity than I do in your paranoia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812758</id>
	<title>Re:Science has triumphed once more!!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263810120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must have a <i>very</i> uninteresting sex life</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must have a very uninteresting sex life</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must have a very uninteresting sex life</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815090</id>
	<title>Re:Science has triumphed once more!!!!</title>
	<author>Hamoohead</author>
	<datestamp>1263824220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Harcourt!  Harcourt Fenton Mudd, have you been drinking again?  Well let me tell you something. .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.thing. .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.thing. .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Harcourt !
Harcourt Fenton Mudd , have you been drinking again ?
Well let me tell you something .
. .thing .
. .thing .
. .
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Harcourt!
Harcourt Fenton Mudd, have you been drinking again?
Well let me tell you something.
. .thing.
. .thing.
. .
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815372</id>
	<title>Energy Applications</title>
	<author>Tibia1</author>
	<datestamp>1263827520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When you consider manufacturing nanotechnology, what is required? Nanotechnology is already used today to make very efficient energy
<a href="http://www.nanosolar.com/" title="nanosolar.com" rel="nofollow">nanopanels</a> [nanosolar.com] to produce the energy needed for these plants. <br> <br>Then, with the end product of manufacturing(one of many examples: nanorobots designed to extract carbon from our atmosphere filled with it) and voila: you have the resource(carbon) and energy needed to power the manufacturing. The energy is created by panels, and used to manufacture more panels/nanobots, and also create nanopanels on nanobots to allow the nanobots to operate and break bonds such as carbon and oxygen. <br> <br>
These plants are already very efficient, and breakthroughs like this are catapulting us into a new age of technology.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When you consider manufacturing nanotechnology , what is required ?
Nanotechnology is already used today to make very efficient energy nanopanels [ nanosolar.com ] to produce the energy needed for these plants .
Then , with the end product of manufacturing ( one of many examples : nanorobots designed to extract carbon from our atmosphere filled with it ) and voila : you have the resource ( carbon ) and energy needed to power the manufacturing .
The energy is created by panels , and used to manufacture more panels/nanobots , and also create nanopanels on nanobots to allow the nanobots to operate and break bonds such as carbon and oxygen .
These plants are already very efficient , and breakthroughs like this are catapulting us into a new age of technology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you consider manufacturing nanotechnology, what is required?
Nanotechnology is already used today to make very efficient energy
nanopanels [nanosolar.com] to produce the energy needed for these plants.
Then, with the end product of manufacturing(one of many examples: nanorobots designed to extract carbon from our atmosphere filled with it) and voila: you have the resource(carbon) and energy needed to power the manufacturing.
The energy is created by panels, and used to manufacture more panels/nanobots, and also create nanopanels on nanobots to allow the nanobots to operate and break bonds such as carbon and oxygen.
These plants are already very efficient, and breakthroughs like this are catapulting us into a new age of technology.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814514</id>
	<title>Terrible, Terrible Summary</title>
	<author>TeethWhitener</author>
	<datestamp>1263819900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mr. Anissimov (author of TFA) has either dumbed the science down too much or simply doesn't understand what's going on.  I'll try to give a summary of the Nature Nanotechnology paper as clearly and concisely as possible.
<p>
First, the researchers made a nanodevice with two slots that could accommodate so-called "DNA cassettes" in a programmable way.  The DNA cassettes themselves have free ends that can only bond with complementary DNA.  Each of the DNA cassettes has an 'A' end (that can only bond with other A-type molecules) and a 'B' end (I'm simplifying this greatly; 'A' has nothing to do with adenine).  The cassettes can be inserted into the two slots with either the 'A' end up or the 'B' end up.  So this means there are a total of four states for the device: (1) first slot: A up, B down; second slot: A up, B down; (2) first slot: A down, B up; second slot: A up, B down, etc.  The researchers were then able to take four target molecules (one for each of the four programmable states) and show that they bonded to their complementary state.  Further, by developing an error-correcting scheme, they were able to get the fidelity of the bonding to 'apparently flawless' levels (quoting FTA, more on this in a sec).
</p><p>
A little more explanation is in order.  All of the target molecules have an 'A' and 'B' marker on both ends of their strand.  Now, say for example the nanodevice is in state 2:  1A down, 1B up, 2A up, 2B down.  The complementary molecule to bind this state would have four markers with 'A' oriented downward and 'B' oriented upward on one end of the strand, and 'A' orented upward and 'B' oriented downward on the other end of the strand.  The problem with this is that other target molecules which aren't complementary can still bind.  For example, the target for the 1A up, 1B down, 2A down, 2B up would fit equally well into this binding pocket upside down.  Also, any of the target molecules can bind with half of the binding pocket, leaving the non-complementary end either dangling or only loosely bound.  The researchers get around these two problems using their error-correction scheme.  It turns out that the correct target molecules bind more tightly to their complements than the incorrect ones.  By heating the devices slightly, the researchers can dissociate the incorrect binding while keeping the correct binding intact.  This is, I believe, what was meant by the phrase '100\% accuracy.'  So, in short, it's still exciting research, at least from my point of view, but no one's moving individual atoms with 100\% accuracy or any of the hyper-exaggerated nonsense that I've been reading here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr. Anissimov ( author of TFA ) has either dumbed the science down too much or simply does n't understand what 's going on .
I 'll try to give a summary of the Nature Nanotechnology paper as clearly and concisely as possible .
First , the researchers made a nanodevice with two slots that could accommodate so-called " DNA cassettes " in a programmable way .
The DNA cassettes themselves have free ends that can only bond with complementary DNA .
Each of the DNA cassettes has an 'A ' end ( that can only bond with other A-type molecules ) and a 'B ' end ( I 'm simplifying this greatly ; 'A ' has nothing to do with adenine ) .
The cassettes can be inserted into the two slots with either the 'A ' end up or the 'B ' end up .
So this means there are a total of four states for the device : ( 1 ) first slot : A up , B down ; second slot : A up , B down ; ( 2 ) first slot : A down , B up ; second slot : A up , B down , etc .
The researchers were then able to take four target molecules ( one for each of the four programmable states ) and show that they bonded to their complementary state .
Further , by developing an error-correcting scheme , they were able to get the fidelity of the bonding to 'apparently flawless ' levels ( quoting FTA , more on this in a sec ) .
A little more explanation is in order .
All of the target molecules have an 'A ' and 'B ' marker on both ends of their strand .
Now , say for example the nanodevice is in state 2 : 1A down , 1B up , 2A up , 2B down .
The complementary molecule to bind this state would have four markers with 'A ' oriented downward and 'B ' oriented upward on one end of the strand , and 'A ' orented upward and 'B ' oriented downward on the other end of the strand .
The problem with this is that other target molecules which are n't complementary can still bind .
For example , the target for the 1A up , 1B down , 2A down , 2B up would fit equally well into this binding pocket upside down .
Also , any of the target molecules can bind with half of the binding pocket , leaving the non-complementary end either dangling or only loosely bound .
The researchers get around these two problems using their error-correction scheme .
It turns out that the correct target molecules bind more tightly to their complements than the incorrect ones .
By heating the devices slightly , the researchers can dissociate the incorrect binding while keeping the correct binding intact .
This is , I believe , what was meant by the phrase '100 \ % accuracy .
' So , in short , it 's still exciting research , at least from my point of view , but no one 's moving individual atoms with 100 \ % accuracy or any of the hyper-exaggerated nonsense that I 've been reading here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr. Anissimov (author of TFA) has either dumbed the science down too much or simply doesn't understand what's going on.
I'll try to give a summary of the Nature Nanotechnology paper as clearly and concisely as possible.
First, the researchers made a nanodevice with two slots that could accommodate so-called "DNA cassettes" in a programmable way.
The DNA cassettes themselves have free ends that can only bond with complementary DNA.
Each of the DNA cassettes has an 'A' end (that can only bond with other A-type molecules) and a 'B' end (I'm simplifying this greatly; 'A' has nothing to do with adenine).
The cassettes can be inserted into the two slots with either the 'A' end up or the 'B' end up.
So this means there are a total of four states for the device: (1) first slot: A up, B down; second slot: A up, B down; (2) first slot: A down, B up; second slot: A up, B down, etc.
The researchers were then able to take four target molecules (one for each of the four programmable states) and show that they bonded to their complementary state.
Further, by developing an error-correcting scheme, they were able to get the fidelity of the bonding to 'apparently flawless' levels (quoting FTA, more on this in a sec).
A little more explanation is in order.
All of the target molecules have an 'A' and 'B' marker on both ends of their strand.
Now, say for example the nanodevice is in state 2:  1A down, 1B up, 2A up, 2B down.
The complementary molecule to bind this state would have four markers with 'A' oriented downward and 'B' oriented upward on one end of the strand, and 'A' orented upward and 'B' oriented downward on the other end of the strand.
The problem with this is that other target molecules which aren't complementary can still bind.
For example, the target for the 1A up, 1B down, 2A down, 2B up would fit equally well into this binding pocket upside down.
Also, any of the target molecules can bind with half of the binding pocket, leaving the non-complementary end either dangling or only loosely bound.
The researchers get around these two problems using their error-correction scheme.
It turns out that the correct target molecules bind more tightly to their complements than the incorrect ones.
By heating the devices slightly, the researchers can dissociate the incorrect binding while keeping the correct binding intact.
This is, I believe, what was meant by the phrase '100\% accuracy.
'  So, in short, it's still exciting research, at least from my point of view, but no one's moving individual atoms with 100\% accuracy or any of the hyper-exaggerated nonsense that I've been reading here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811796</id>
	<title>Re:DNA</title>
	<author>thehostiles</author>
	<datestamp>1263805620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could it then be possible to alter our brain pathways to increase our memory, cognition and senses?<br><br>I'd like better eyesight.<br><br>Although likely, companies will patent this<br>technology.<br><br>Microsoft DNA Kit. just plug this wifi adapter into your computer and specify the alterations you want.<br>Although, if people could hack the system, untold tragedy/hilarity would ensue.<br><br>My neighbour could hack my body into constantly thinking about shock images and replacing every fifth noun with the word "porn"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could it then be possible to alter our brain pathways to increase our memory , cognition and senses ? I 'd like better eyesight.Although likely , companies will patent thistechnology.Microsoft DNA Kit .
just plug this wifi adapter into your computer and specify the alterations you want.Although , if people could hack the system , untold tragedy/hilarity would ensue.My neighbour could hack my body into constantly thinking about shock images and replacing every fifth noun with the word " porn "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could it then be possible to alter our brain pathways to increase our memory, cognition and senses?I'd like better eyesight.Although likely, companies will patent thistechnology.Microsoft DNA Kit.
just plug this wifi adapter into your computer and specify the alterations you want.Although, if people could hack the system, untold tragedy/hilarity would ensue.My neighbour could hack my body into constantly thinking about shock images and replacing every fifth noun with the word "porn"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811632</id>
	<title>Re:Exponential Growth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263848040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh great. Replicators.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh great .
Replicators .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh great.
Replicators.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815834</id>
	<title>I Don't Believe It</title>
	<author>Doc Ruby</author>
	<datestamp>1263832560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't believe that there's such a thing as "100\%" of anything happening at atomic scale. "100\%" is what "99.9999999999999\%" looks like when things are big enough that you have to drop the precision due to statistical balancing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't believe that there 's such a thing as " 100 \ % " of anything happening at atomic scale .
" 100 \ % " is what " 99.9999999999999 \ % " looks like when things are big enough that you have to drop the precision due to statistical balancing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't believe that there's such a thing as "100\%" of anything happening at atomic scale.
"100\%" is what "99.9999999999999\%" looks like when things are big enough that you have to drop the precision due to statistical balancing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812490</id>
	<title>Nanoborgs</title>
	<author>Jessified</author>
	<datestamp>1263808860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Resistance is futile.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Resistance is futile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Resistance is futile.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811954</id>
	<title>Re:Question:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263806280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Last time that I checked, Gold was an atom.</p><p>Diamonds might be possible. But I think the story is referring to DNA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Last time that I checked , Gold was an atom.Diamonds might be possible .
But I think the story is referring to DNA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last time that I checked, Gold was an atom.Diamonds might be possible.
But I think the story is referring to DNA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812096</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>inviolet</author>
	<datestamp>1263806940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>In that case, would it be possible to build something that disassembles atmospheric carbon dioxide, and build pencil lead and release oxygen in the process?</p><p>Of course, then you get into the problem of the energy stored in chemical bonds, and the energy required to overcome that. I have no idea if/how that applies to nanoscale robots, since they're mechanically working on individual atoms, rather than a bulk chemical reaction.</p></div></blockquote><p>What do you mean "then you get into the problem..."?  That IS the problem!
</p><p>In a less snarky tone: we have many methods of separating the carbon from the oxygen.  The difficulty is in first producing the energy needed to run the separation method -- because so many of our energy sources operate by combining carbon with oxygen.
</p><p>Now that oil is getting expensive we'll see nuclear rebound.  The envirowackos overestimated their own influence against nuclear, fancying their opinions to somehow override the almighty dollar.  It has always (and only) been cheap oil keeping nuclear power generation at bay.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In that case , would it be possible to build something that disassembles atmospheric carbon dioxide , and build pencil lead and release oxygen in the process ? Of course , then you get into the problem of the energy stored in chemical bonds , and the energy required to overcome that .
I have no idea if/how that applies to nanoscale robots , since they 're mechanically working on individual atoms , rather than a bulk chemical reaction.What do you mean " then you get into the problem... " ?
That IS the problem !
In a less snarky tone : we have many methods of separating the carbon from the oxygen .
The difficulty is in first producing the energy needed to run the separation method -- because so many of our energy sources operate by combining carbon with oxygen .
Now that oil is getting expensive we 'll see nuclear rebound .
The envirowackos overestimated their own influence against nuclear , fancying their opinions to somehow override the almighty dollar .
It has always ( and only ) been cheap oil keeping nuclear power generation at bay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In that case, would it be possible to build something that disassembles atmospheric carbon dioxide, and build pencil lead and release oxygen in the process?Of course, then you get into the problem of the energy stored in chemical bonds, and the energy required to overcome that.
I have no idea if/how that applies to nanoscale robots, since they're mechanically working on individual atoms, rather than a bulk chemical reaction.What do you mean "then you get into the problem..."?
That IS the problem!
In a less snarky tone: we have many methods of separating the carbon from the oxygen.
The difficulty is in first producing the energy needed to run the separation method -- because so many of our energy sources operate by combining carbon with oxygen.
Now that oil is getting expensive we'll see nuclear rebound.
The envirowackos overestimated their own influence against nuclear, fancying their opinions to somehow override the almighty dollar.
It has always (and only) been cheap oil keeping nuclear power generation at bay.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812592</id>
	<title>Re:Science has triumphed once more!!!!</title>
	<author>Hotawa Hawk-eye</author>
	<datestamp>1263809400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nope, just a few months to assemble the basic building blocks into an egg, about 9 months and a couple thousand dollars for a surrogate, $AGE\_OF\_CONSENT years for maturity, and then preventative maintenance from then on to fix minor defects as they arise.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope , just a few months to assemble the basic building blocks into an egg , about 9 months and a couple thousand dollars for a surrogate , $ AGE \ _OF \ _CONSENT years for maturity , and then preventative maintenance from then on to fix minor defects as they arise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope, just a few months to assemble the basic building blocks into an egg, about 9 months and a couple thousand dollars for a surrogate, $AGE\_OF\_CONSENT years for maturity, and then preventative maintenance from then on to fix minor defects as they arise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30816748</id>
	<title>Re:DNA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263931800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Runtime patching of imperative code in multiple parallel threads with no respect to state of variables? NEAT!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Runtime patching of imperative code in multiple parallel threads with no respect to state of variables ?
NEAT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Runtime patching of imperative code in multiple parallel threads with no respect to state of variables?
NEAT!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30817714</id>
	<title>Re:Did we just break heisenberg's principle?</title>
	<author>PingPongBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1263902460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>If it can move and place particles with 100\% accuracy </em></p><p>Too bad the placed particles won't stay placed. If there is any kind of electric force between the placed atoms or the surrounding atoms, things will start moving. So you can't just build a cell or even a protein molecule atom by atom, like a building. If you want to build large objects on the atomic scale, you may have to handle bunches of wiggly molecules.</p><p>Nevertheless, building light-based computers and quantum computers never looked so easy. So let's have some on the shelves by Xmas 2012.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it can move and place particles with 100 \ % accuracy Too bad the placed particles wo n't stay placed .
If there is any kind of electric force between the placed atoms or the surrounding atoms , things will start moving .
So you ca n't just build a cell or even a protein molecule atom by atom , like a building .
If you want to build large objects on the atomic scale , you may have to handle bunches of wiggly molecules.Nevertheless , building light-based computers and quantum computers never looked so easy .
So let 's have some on the shelves by Xmas 2012 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it can move and place particles with 100\% accuracy Too bad the placed particles won't stay placed.
If there is any kind of electric force between the placed atoms or the surrounding atoms, things will start moving.
So you can't just build a cell or even a protein molecule atom by atom, like a building.
If you want to build large objects on the atomic scale, you may have to handle bunches of wiggly molecules.Nevertheless, building light-based computers and quantum computers never looked so easy.
So let's have some on the shelves by Xmas 2012.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812126</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263807060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's still a chemical reaction, it's just a very precisly controlled one.  You would still have to add energy to break the bond in a molecule of CO2.  I suspect that if someone goes through all the trouble to do that, they'll have it produce diamonds instead of pencil lead, since at least then you can sell the result and maybe make a bit of profit off of it (though not for long, what with economies of scale and everything.  If this is really possible in large scale diamond will be cheaper than glass someday).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's still a chemical reaction , it 's just a very precisly controlled one .
You would still have to add energy to break the bond in a molecule of CO2 .
I suspect that if someone goes through all the trouble to do that , they 'll have it produce diamonds instead of pencil lead , since at least then you can sell the result and maybe make a bit of profit off of it ( though not for long , what with economies of scale and everything .
If this is really possible in large scale diamond will be cheaper than glass someday ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's still a chemical reaction, it's just a very precisly controlled one.
You would still have to add energy to break the bond in a molecule of CO2.
I suspect that if someone goes through all the trouble to do that, they'll have it produce diamonds instead of pencil lead, since at least then you can sell the result and maybe make a bit of profit off of it (though not for long, what with economies of scale and everything.
If this is really possible in large scale diamond will be cheaper than glass someday).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812062</id>
	<title>Joke video</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263806820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This reminded me of the joke (can't find it now - if you know it please link to it!).  Some scientists in a lab though it was funny because they made a large molecule 30\% larger than the other molecules like it.  Everyone looking at the image of it though it was the funniest thing ever.  I thought it was one of those intel commercials, but I couldn't find it.<br>
<br>
Anyway, this reminded me of that.  Also when you are talking about something that small, how do you prove that they are doing what they are saying they are doing?  It is so specialized that hardly anybody else has the equipment to do what they are doing so how does anyone prove or disprove it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This reminded me of the joke ( ca n't find it now - if you know it please link to it ! ) .
Some scientists in a lab though it was funny because they made a large molecule 30 \ % larger than the other molecules like it .
Everyone looking at the image of it though it was the funniest thing ever .
I thought it was one of those intel commercials , but I could n't find it .
Anyway , this reminded me of that .
Also when you are talking about something that small , how do you prove that they are doing what they are saying they are doing ?
It is so specialized that hardly anybody else has the equipment to do what they are doing so how does anyone prove or disprove it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This reminded me of the joke (can't find it now - if you know it please link to it!).
Some scientists in a lab though it was funny because they made a large molecule 30\% larger than the other molecules like it.
Everyone looking at the image of it though it was the funniest thing ever.
I thought it was one of those intel commercials, but I couldn't find it.
Anyway, this reminded me of that.
Also when you are talking about something that small, how do you prove that they are doing what they are saying they are doing?
It is so specialized that hardly anybody else has the equipment to do what they are doing so how does anyone prove or disprove it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812438</id>
	<title>Re:DNA</title>
	<author>Darth Sdlavrot</author>
	<datestamp>1263808560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd settle for fixing the telomeres after cell division.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd settle for fixing the telomeres after cell division .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd settle for fixing the telomeres after cell division.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811598</id>
	<title>Re:Science has triumphed once more!!!!</title>
	<author>crsuperman34</author>
	<datestamp>1263847860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anthony Michael Hall and his late 80's PC are way ahead of you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anthony Michael Hall and his late 80 's PC are way ahead of you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anthony Michael Hall and his late 80's PC are way ahead of you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811728</id>
	<title>Misleading headline</title>
	<author>flaming error</author>
	<datestamp>1263805320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article is about protein folding and manipulating DNA.  It has nothing to do with a robot that picks up atoms and places them somewhere else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article is about protein folding and manipulating DNA .
It has nothing to do with a robot that picks up atoms and places them somewhere else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article is about protein folding and manipulating DNA.
It has nothing to do with a robot that picks up atoms and places them somewhere else.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30820106</id>
	<title>Wow a hope for good health for us all</title>
	<author>dmccullo</author>
	<datestamp>1263920700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about a personal health NanoBot, doing routine maintenance tasks and performing health improvement actions with the guidance of a specialist.
Seems far fetched but really?  how far?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about a personal health NanoBot , doing routine maintenance tasks and performing health improvement actions with the guidance of a specialist .
Seems far fetched but really ?
how far ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about a personal health NanoBot, doing routine maintenance tasks and performing health improvement actions with the guidance of a specialist.
Seems far fetched but really?
how far?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30816056</id>
	<title>DANGER!</title>
	<author>nate nice</author>
	<datestamp>1263834900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These nano-bots are just going to get us in trouble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These nano-bots are just going to get us in trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These nano-bots are just going to get us in trouble.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813468</id>
	<title>Re:DNA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263813600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be too late for that. Your body is completely formed already.<br>You wouldn't grow a third arm or something like that. But it could be useful to treat some diseases if it were possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be too late for that .
Your body is completely formed already.You would n't grow a third arm or something like that .
But it could be useful to treat some diseases if it were possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be too late for that.
Your body is completely formed already.You wouldn't grow a third arm or something like that.
But it could be useful to treat some diseases if it were possible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811826</id>
	<title>Re:DNA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263805740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It places individual atoms, it can do just about anything, given time.<br>
<br>
However, there are limits. Lets say, for example, that you managed to simultaneously change the DNA in every cell in your body in such a way that if you'd had this mutation in the womb you'd have grown an extra set of arms. Would that do anything? No, of course not. Otherwise people who had an arm cut off would grow it back. Now, it might very well be possible to find a DNA sequence that would let you grow an extra set of arms (or wings, or whatever radical change you want) as an adult... but it would be several times as complex as alterations made before conception.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It places individual atoms , it can do just about anything , given time .
However , there are limits .
Lets say , for example , that you managed to simultaneously change the DNA in every cell in your body in such a way that if you 'd had this mutation in the womb you 'd have grown an extra set of arms .
Would that do anything ?
No , of course not .
Otherwise people who had an arm cut off would grow it back .
Now , it might very well be possible to find a DNA sequence that would let you grow an extra set of arms ( or wings , or whatever radical change you want ) as an adult... but it would be several times as complex as alterations made before conception .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It places individual atoms, it can do just about anything, given time.
However, there are limits.
Lets say, for example, that you managed to simultaneously change the DNA in every cell in your body in such a way that if you'd had this mutation in the womb you'd have grown an extra set of arms.
Would that do anything?
No, of course not.
Otherwise people who had an arm cut off would grow it back.
Now, it might very well be possible to find a DNA sequence that would let you grow an extra set of arms (or wings, or whatever radical change you want) as an adult... but it would be several times as complex as alterations made before conception.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30818322</id>
	<title>Re:Exponential Growth</title>
	<author>SolusSD</author>
	<datestamp>1263910560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>crap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>crap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30816748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30817714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30816990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30821032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30817346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30826124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30818322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30822624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811598
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30816316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30817014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1742230_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1742230.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1742230.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811256
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811402
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30816316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30817714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811974
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813482
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813486
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1742230.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30816470
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1742230.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812838
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1742230.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812358
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30816990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812126
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815310
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30817014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812188
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30822624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812096
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1742230.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813752
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1742230.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811918
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812290
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813110
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815436
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815296
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812184
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1742230.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30816748
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1742230.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1742230.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1742230.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1742230.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30817346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30814844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811536
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30821032
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812758
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811766
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30813954
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30826124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1742230.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811264
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1742230.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811272
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1742230.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811362
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812418
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30818322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30811986
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30815840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1742230.30812886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
