<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_13_2130205</id>
	<title>Porn Industry Tiptoes Into 3D Video</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1263375780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>itwbennett writes <i>"The 3D porn experience is coming (eventually) to a home theater near you. Most adult filmmakers are moving slowly toward 3D video because of higher production cost, the small number of 3D TVs in the home, and, of course, the glasses. Rob Smith, director of operations at Hustler Video Group says he hopes that market penetration of 3D TVs in the home is high enough that 'by the fourth quarter of this year it will be at the point where we can justify doing a 3D product.' The average adult movie costs around $25,000 to $40,000 to make, and 3D movies cost about 30\% more, says Ali Joone, founder of Digital Playground. But Joone thinks the biggest hurdle for 3D isn't so much the cost as the glasses: <a href="http://www.itworld.com/\%5Bprimary-term\%5D/92264/porn-industry-tiptoes-3d-video">people don't want to be encumbered by eyewear when viewing a film</a>, says Joone."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>itwbennett writes " The 3D porn experience is coming ( eventually ) to a home theater near you .
Most adult filmmakers are moving slowly toward 3D video because of higher production cost , the small number of 3D TVs in the home , and , of course , the glasses .
Rob Smith , director of operations at Hustler Video Group says he hopes that market penetration of 3D TVs in the home is high enough that 'by the fourth quarter of this year it will be at the point where we can justify doing a 3D product .
' The average adult movie costs around $ 25,000 to $ 40,000 to make , and 3D movies cost about 30 \ % more , says Ali Joone , founder of Digital Playground .
But Joone thinks the biggest hurdle for 3D is n't so much the cost as the glasses : people do n't want to be encumbered by eyewear when viewing a film , says Joone .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>itwbennett writes "The 3D porn experience is coming (eventually) to a home theater near you.
Most adult filmmakers are moving slowly toward 3D video because of higher production cost, the small number of 3D TVs in the home, and, of course, the glasses.
Rob Smith, director of operations at Hustler Video Group says he hopes that market penetration of 3D TVs in the home is high enough that 'by the fourth quarter of this year it will be at the point where we can justify doing a 3D product.
' The average adult movie costs around $25,000 to $40,000 to make, and 3D movies cost about 30\% more, says Ali Joone, founder of Digital Playground.
But Joone thinks the biggest hurdle for 3D isn't so much the cost as the glasses: people don't want to be encumbered by eyewear when viewing a film, says Joone.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759728</id>
	<title>Re:Encumbered by eyeware?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263393780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think the blind usually need glasses...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think the blind usually need glasses.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think the blind usually need glasses...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758792</id>
	<title>Re:Oh God</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263388560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't get it... the money shot isn't filmed from the female's POV</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't get it... the money shot is n't filmed from the female 's POV</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't get it... the money shot isn't filmed from the female's POV</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757948</id>
	<title>Re:30,000-40,000???!!!</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1263385260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The porn that I've researched seems to have been made on a sub-$1,000 budget, how are they spending so much money!?</p></div><p>Hookers and boo-- wait, no, that doesn't make sense.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The porn that I 've researched seems to have been made on a sub- $ 1,000 budget , how are they spending so much money !
? Hookers and boo-- wait , no , that does n't make sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The porn that I've researched seems to have been made on a sub-$1,000 budget, how are they spending so much money!
?Hookers and boo-- wait, no, that doesn't make sense.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759426</id>
	<title>Re:Penetration</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1263391620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>the female of the species (an increasingly large demographic)</i></p><p>They're not fat, they're just big boned.</p><p>Get it?  Boned?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the female of the species ( an increasingly large demographic ) They 're not fat , they 're just big boned.Get it ?
Boned ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the female of the species (an increasingly large demographic)They're not fat, they're just big boned.Get it?
Boned?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30762676</id>
	<title>market penetration?</title>
	<author>oDDmON oUT</author>
	<datestamp>1263473820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not the only thing being "penetrated" here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not the only thing being " penetrated " here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not the only thing being "penetrated" here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756788</id>
	<title>I see an Increase</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1263379740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In POV porn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In POV porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In POV porn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757958</id>
	<title>Mirrorshades Me</title>
	<author>Doc Ruby</author>
	<datestamp>1263385260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd rather be wearing some display glasses that I can even forget I'm wearing than have to old something in my hands and look at its tiny screen. Add 3D and the vastly higher rez, the privacy, the overlays referring to what/who/where I'm looking, and I wish they'd put a smartphone in the glasses already. Even if I'm the only one who wants one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather be wearing some display glasses that I can even forget I 'm wearing than have to old something in my hands and look at its tiny screen .
Add 3D and the vastly higher rez , the privacy , the overlays referring to what/who/where I 'm looking , and I wish they 'd put a smartphone in the glasses already .
Even if I 'm the only one who wants one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather be wearing some display glasses that I can even forget I'm wearing than have to old something in my hands and look at its tiny screen.
Add 3D and the vastly higher rez, the privacy, the overlays referring to what/who/where I'm looking, and I wish they'd put a smartphone in the glasses already.
Even if I'm the only one who wants one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30765150</id>
	<title>Obligatory response</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263487980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ow!  My EYE!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ow !
My EYE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ow!
My EYE!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30761530</id>
	<title>Re:Encumbered by eyeware?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263412440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://mediabullseye.com/mb/storyphotos/funny-pictures-captain-obvious-cat.jpg" title="mediabullseye.com" rel="nofollow">Thanks for the explanation!</a> [mediabullseye.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for the explanation !
[ mediabullseye.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for the explanation!
[mediabullseye.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758482</id>
	<title>Re:Penetration height?!</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1263387240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>WTF kind of retard is Rob Smith?! Even your average Slashdot user knows that penetration is measured in terms of depth, not height.</p></div></blockquote><p>Your average Slashdot user thinks "penetration" is when Fenix and a squad of dark templars break through a huge zerg swarm to destroy the hive cluster.</p><p><i>En Taro Tassadar!</i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF kind of retard is Rob Smith ? !
Even your average Slashdot user knows that penetration is measured in terms of depth , not height.Your average Slashdot user thinks " penetration " is when Fenix and a squad of dark templars break through a huge zerg swarm to destroy the hive cluster.En Taro Tassadar !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF kind of retard is Rob Smith?!
Even your average Slashdot user knows that penetration is measured in terms of depth, not height.Your average Slashdot user thinks "penetration" is when Fenix and a squad of dark templars break through a huge zerg swarm to destroy the hive cluster.En Taro Tassadar!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757598</id>
	<title>"Viewing a film."</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263383580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kids these days and their slang.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:|</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kids these days and their slang .
: |</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kids these days and their slang.
:|</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757528</id>
	<title>Going blind</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263383160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The 3D experience isn't that great.  It causes headaches and eyestrain.  Porn makes you go blind as it is.  With 3D it will be worse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 3D experience is n't that great .
It causes headaches and eyestrain .
Porn makes you go blind as it is .
With 3D it will be worse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 3D experience isn't that great.
It causes headaches and eyestrain.
Porn makes you go blind as it is.
With 3D it will be worse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758020</id>
	<title>midget porn or voyeurs</title>
	<author>pydev</author>
	<datestamp>1263385560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A big problem with 3D porn (and other 3D) is that you get an absolute size scale.  If you see a complete man or woman on your 30" color LCD and view it from anything like normal viewing distances, it doesn't work well: either you see a normal sized person far away through a small window, or you see a tiny figure right where your screen is.  That's OK for midget porn or voyeurism, but it doesn't work so well for more standard porn.</p><p>If you want regular-sized people at regular distances, you need life-size displays... which means 3D projectors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A big problem with 3D porn ( and other 3D ) is that you get an absolute size scale .
If you see a complete man or woman on your 30 " color LCD and view it from anything like normal viewing distances , it does n't work well : either you see a normal sized person far away through a small window , or you see a tiny figure right where your screen is .
That 's OK for midget porn or voyeurism , but it does n't work so well for more standard porn.If you want regular-sized people at regular distances , you need life-size displays... which means 3D projectors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A big problem with 3D porn (and other 3D) is that you get an absolute size scale.
If you see a complete man or woman on your 30" color LCD and view it from anything like normal viewing distances, it doesn't work well: either you see a normal sized person far away through a small window, or you see a tiny figure right where your screen is.
That's OK for midget porn or voyeurism, but it doesn't work so well for more standard porn.If you want regular-sized people at regular distances, you need life-size displays... which means 3D projectors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757320</id>
	<title>30,000-40,000???!!!</title>
	<author>Loomismeister</author>
	<datestamp>1263382260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The porn that I've researched seems to have been made on a sub-$1,000 budget, how are they spending so much money!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The porn that I 've researched seems to have been made on a sub- $ 1,000 budget , how are they spending so much money !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The porn that I've researched seems to have been made on a sub-$1,000 budget, how are they spending so much money!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757594</id>
	<title>Re:Who cares about eyeglasses!?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1263383580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've seen a couple 3d movies in the past year at separate theaters.  In neither case did I buy glasses.  Just picked them up at the entrance, and dropped them off at the exit.  The 3d movie was a little more expensive than its 2d counterpart though, maybe that's what you're complaining about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen a couple 3d movies in the past year at separate theaters .
In neither case did I buy glasses .
Just picked them up at the entrance , and dropped them off at the exit .
The 3d movie was a little more expensive than its 2d counterpart though , maybe that 's what you 're complaining about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen a couple 3d movies in the past year at separate theaters.
In neither case did I buy glasses.
Just picked them up at the entrance, and dropped them off at the exit.
The 3d movie was a little more expensive than its 2d counterpart though, maybe that's what you're complaining about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757684</id>
	<title>Eye Protection</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263383880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does no one see the added benefit of the glasses doubling as "eye protection," from certain types of...projectiles?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does no one see the added benefit of the glasses doubling as " eye protection , " from certain types of...projectiles ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does no one see the added benefit of the glasses doubling as "eye protection," from certain types of...projectiles?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757600</id>
	<title>This is not a new thing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263383580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I was barely 21, or so, around 30 years ago, the porn flick "Stewardesses" was released in 3D.</p><p>I have no idea if it was a "big hit" or not, but watching ankles in peripheral vision was an interesting experience.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was barely 21 , or so , around 30 years ago , the porn flick " Stewardesses " was released in 3D.I have no idea if it was a " big hit " or not , but watching ankles in peripheral vision was an interesting experience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was barely 21, or so, around 30 years ago, the porn flick "Stewardesses" was released in 3D.I have no idea if it was a "big hit" or not, but watching ankles in peripheral vision was an interesting experience.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759668</id>
	<title>Re:Who cares about eyeglasses!?</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1263393360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Forget about the cost of popcorn and soda... The biggest ripoff in the theater today are the 3D glasses. You have to buy them EVERY time.</p></div><p>a.) You're paying for the projector, not the glasses.  Eventually the dust will settle and they'll sort out the whole 'owning glasses' thing.</p><p>b.) You are getting new glasses every time, you opting not to grab them is on you.  It's a fair shade better than $4 for Reese's Pieces.</p><p>c.) If it costs too much, go see the 2d version.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget about the cost of popcorn and soda... The biggest ripoff in the theater today are the 3D glasses .
You have to buy them EVERY time.a .
) You 're paying for the projector , not the glasses .
Eventually the dust will settle and they 'll sort out the whole 'owning glasses ' thing.b .
) You are getting new glasses every time , you opting not to grab them is on you .
It 's a fair shade better than $ 4 for Reese 's Pieces.c .
) If it costs too much , go see the 2d version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget about the cost of popcorn and soda... The biggest ripoff in the theater today are the 3D glasses.
You have to buy them EVERY time.a.
) You're paying for the projector, not the glasses.
Eventually the dust will settle and they'll sort out the whole 'owning glasses' thing.b.
) You are getting new glasses every time, you opting not to grab them is on you.
It's a fair shade better than $4 for Reese's Pieces.c.
) If it costs too much, go see the 2d version.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757638</id>
	<title>Re:I think</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1263383700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hell yeah, I don't want to be distracted by looking for those glasses, it's already a showstopper that you have to grab those towels when it's about to... I mean, so I heard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hell yeah , I do n't want to be distracted by looking for those glasses , it 's already a showstopper that you have to grab those towels when it 's about to... I mean , so I heard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hell yeah, I don't want to be distracted by looking for those glasses, it's already a showstopper that you have to grab those towels when it's about to... I mean, so I heard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756842</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30762192</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking of money shots...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263466620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank god - I thought I was the only one to think that (simply because it's absolutely everywhere so I assumed there was a market for it!).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank god - I thought I was the only one to think that ( simply because it 's absolutely everywhere so I assumed there was a market for it !
) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank god - I thought I was the only one to think that (simply because it's absolutely everywhere so I assumed there was a market for it!
).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756792</id>
	<title>Triple D</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263379800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And here I thought that Double D was more than enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And here I thought that Double D was more than enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And here I thought that Double D was more than enough.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757350</id>
	<title>Re:Penetration</title>
	<author>mr\_lizard13</author>
	<datestamp>1263382380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>+1 Fanny</htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 1 Fanny</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+1 Fanny</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757648</id>
	<title>Re:Penetration</title>
	<author>citab</author>
	<datestamp>1263383700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmmm, did you just say that women are getting increasingly larger?</p><p>Supersize me!!! (not an actual Extenze recommendation)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm , did you just say that women are getting increasingly larger ? Supersize me ! ! !
( not an actual Extenze recommendation )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm, did you just say that women are getting increasingly larger?Supersize me!!!
(not an actual Extenze recommendation)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756918</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Doctor Faustus</author>
	<datestamp>1263380340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Watching a Blu-Ray movie is already the only time I put on my glasses in my living room.  It doesn't really sound like a stretch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Watching a Blu-Ray movie is already the only time I put on my glasses in my living room .
It does n't really sound like a stretch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watching a Blu-Ray movie is already the only time I put on my glasses in my living room.
It doesn't really sound like a stretch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758698</id>
	<title>Re:When did they ask?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263388140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're kidding, right? Avatar was the least gimmicky 3d film I've seen. All the other ones make no use of he 3d, except to shove something in your face every once in a while. In avatar, it just helped you become immersed in the film.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're kidding , right ?
Avatar was the least gimmicky 3d film I 've seen .
All the other ones make no use of he 3d , except to shove something in your face every once in a while .
In avatar , it just helped you become immersed in the film .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're kidding, right?
Avatar was the least gimmicky 3d film I've seen.
All the other ones make no use of he 3d, except to shove something in your face every once in a while.
In avatar, it just helped you become immersed in the film.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756900</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1263380280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who in their right mind would go see a movie that required you to wear glasses while viewing? That's absurd.</p><p>Wait - how many people went to go see Avatar? I lost count.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who in their right mind would go see a movie that required you to wear glasses while viewing ?
That 's absurd.Wait - how many people went to go see Avatar ?
I lost count .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who in their right mind would go see a movie that required you to wear glasses while viewing?
That's absurd.Wait - how many people went to go see Avatar?
I lost count.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759316</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking of money shots...</title>
	<author>Zero\_\_Kelvin</author>
	<datestamp>1263391140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"Speaking of money shots, why is it currently in vogue to finish all sex scenes by having the man ejaculate in the mouth and all over the face of the woman? Does anyone find this a turn-on? To me, it's gross and degrading."</p></div></blockquote><p>I think the difference is that, for most people, it doesn't remind them of their youth.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Speaking of money shots , why is it currently in vogue to finish all sex scenes by having the man ejaculate in the mouth and all over the face of the woman ?
Does anyone find this a turn-on ?
To me , it 's gross and degrading .
" I think the difference is that , for most people , it does n't remind them of their youth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Speaking of money shots, why is it currently in vogue to finish all sex scenes by having the man ejaculate in the mouth and all over the face of the woman?
Does anyone find this a turn-on?
To me, it's gross and degrading.
"I think the difference is that, for most people, it doesn't remind them of their youth.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757916</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>stms</author>
	<datestamp>1263385080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't most people already where glasses while watching porn?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't most people already where glasses while watching porn ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't most people already where glasses while watching porn?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760706</id>
	<title>Wii tie in</title>
	<author>FatdogHaiku</author>
	<datestamp>1263402600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This will make great add-on for the Wii Fitness  folks. Now you can work out and then duck (or catch) that money shot coming (pun intended) straight at the camera!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This will make great add-on for the Wii Fitness folks .
Now you can work out and then duck ( or catch ) that money shot coming ( pun intended ) straight at the camera !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will make great add-on for the Wii Fitness  folks.
Now you can work out and then duck (or catch) that money shot coming (pun intended) straight at the camera!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756924</id>
	<title>Re:Penetration</title>
	<author>jrob323</author>
	<datestamp>1263380340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>3D will certainly allow the market to feel as though they're being penetrated.</htmltext>
<tokenext>3D will certainly allow the market to feel as though they 're being penetrated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3D will certainly allow the market to feel as though they're being penetrated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132</id>
	<title>Speaking of money shots...</title>
	<author>maillemaker</author>
	<datestamp>1263381300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Speaking of money shots, why is it currently in vogue to finish all sex scenes by having the man ejaculate in the mouth and all over the face of the woman?</p><p>Does anyone find this a turn-on?  To me, it's gross and degrading.  I love looking at nekkid women, but I'll pass on the blowjob and cum-on-the-face scenes.  Lack of empathy, I guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Speaking of money shots , why is it currently in vogue to finish all sex scenes by having the man ejaculate in the mouth and all over the face of the woman ? Does anyone find this a turn-on ?
To me , it 's gross and degrading .
I love looking at nekkid women , but I 'll pass on the blowjob and cum-on-the-face scenes .
Lack of empathy , I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Speaking of money shots, why is it currently in vogue to finish all sex scenes by having the man ejaculate in the mouth and all over the face of the woman?Does anyone find this a turn-on?
To me, it's gross and degrading.
I love looking at nekkid women, but I'll pass on the blowjob and cum-on-the-face scenes.
Lack of empathy, I guess.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759142</id>
	<title>Re:why would it cost 30\% more to make porn in 3D?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263390300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Syncing dual tracks and associated storage must cost something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Syncing dual tracks and associated storage must cost something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Syncing dual tracks and associated storage must cost something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757280</id>
	<title>Re:Oh God</title>
	<author>Tiger4</author>
	<datestamp>1263382140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some technology, man was not meant to play with.</p><p>and if you do play with it, you'll go blind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some technology , man was not meant to play with.and if you do play with it , you 'll go blind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some technology, man was not meant to play with.and if you do play with it, you'll go blind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740</id>
	<title>Oh God</title>
	<author>svendsen</author>
	<datestamp>1263379560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Think of the "money" shot...shudder.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of the " money " shot...shudder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of the "money" shot...shudder.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764</id>
	<title>Huh?</title>
	<author>megamerican</author>
	<datestamp>1263379620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But Joone thinks the biggest hurdle for 3D isn't so much the cost as the glasses: people don't want to be encumbered by eyewear when viewing a film, says Joone</p></div><p>That's certainly what people fear most: getting caught wearing glasses while watching porn.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But Joone thinks the biggest hurdle for 3D is n't so much the cost as the glasses : people do n't want to be encumbered by eyewear when viewing a film , says JooneThat 's certainly what people fear most : getting caught wearing glasses while watching porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But Joone thinks the biggest hurdle for 3D isn't so much the cost as the glasses: people don't want to be encumbered by eyewear when viewing a film, says JooneThat's certainly what people fear most: getting caught wearing glasses while watching porn.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757072</id>
	<title>why would it cost 30\% more to make porn in 3D?</title>
	<author>JustNiz</author>
	<datestamp>1263381060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>why would it cost a massive 30\% more to make porn in 3D?<br>Apart from the initial investment in a stereoscopic camera, isn't every other production cost the same? Especially if you're using digital not film. I mean its not like you need to cut/splice the left and right eye-tracks differently.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why would it cost a massive 30 \ % more to make porn in 3D ? Apart from the initial investment in a stereoscopic camera , is n't every other production cost the same ?
Especially if you 're using digital not film .
I mean its not like you need to cut/splice the left and right eye-tracks differently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why would it cost a massive 30\% more to make porn in 3D?Apart from the initial investment in a stereoscopic camera, isn't every other production cost the same?
Especially if you're using digital not film.
I mean its not like you need to cut/splice the left and right eye-tracks differently.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760568</id>
	<title>can I view it until....</title>
	<author>vaporland</author>
	<datestamp>1263401340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I need glasses?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I need glasses ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I need glasses?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760988</id>
	<title>Re:When did they ask?</title>
	<author>Techman83</author>
	<datestamp>1263406080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I did, and was thoroughly disappointed, not in the tech, not in the movie, but for the shear fact that unless they come up with something affordable to fix  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strabismus" title="wikipedia.org">Strabismus</a> [wikipedia.org] or direct interface to the brain, I'll never get to enjoy it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did , and was thoroughly disappointed , not in the tech , not in the movie , but for the shear fact that unless they come up with something affordable to fix Strabismus [ wikipedia.org ] or direct interface to the brain , I 'll never get to enjoy it : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did, and was thoroughly disappointed, not in the tech, not in the movie, but for the shear fact that unless they come up with something affordable to fix  Strabismus [wikipedia.org] or direct interface to the brain, I'll never get to enjoy it :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757428</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking of money shots...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263382620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Speaking of money shots, why is it currently in vogue to finish all sex scenes by having the man ejaculate in the mouth and all over the face of the woman?<br>

Does anyone find this a turn-on? To me, it's gross and degrading. I love looking at nekkid women, but I'll pass on the blowjob and cum-on-the-face scenes.</p></div></blockquote><p>
This. This and run of the mill scenes without any passion, affection or fun. It's just Blowjob, Doggy, Reverse Cowgirl and the the chick has to hurry to get on her knees in time. Bonus points for having a cut right before the finish. I don't want to see that, 3D or 2D.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Speaking of money shots , why is it currently in vogue to finish all sex scenes by having the man ejaculate in the mouth and all over the face of the woman ?
Does anyone find this a turn-on ?
To me , it 's gross and degrading .
I love looking at nekkid women , but I 'll pass on the blowjob and cum-on-the-face scenes .
This. This and run of the mill scenes without any passion , affection or fun .
It 's just Blowjob , Doggy , Reverse Cowgirl and the the chick has to hurry to get on her knees in time .
Bonus points for having a cut right before the finish .
I do n't want to see that , 3D or 2D .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Speaking of money shots, why is it currently in vogue to finish all sex scenes by having the man ejaculate in the mouth and all over the face of the woman?
Does anyone find this a turn-on?
To me, it's gross and degrading.
I love looking at nekkid women, but I'll pass on the blowjob and cum-on-the-face scenes.
This. This and run of the mill scenes without any passion, affection or fun.
It's just Blowjob, Doggy, Reverse Cowgirl and the the chick has to hurry to get on her knees in time.
Bonus points for having a cut right before the finish.
I don't want to see that, 3D or 2D.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757336</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking of money shots...</title>
	<author>houstonbofh</author>
	<datestamp>1263382320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Speaking of money shots, why is it currently in vogue to finish all sex scenes by having the man ejaculate in the mouth and all over the face of the woman?</p><p>Does anyone find this a turn-on?  To me, it's gross and degrading.  I love looking at nekkid women, but I'll pass on the blowjob and cum-on-the-face scenes.  Lack of empathy, I guess.</p></div><p>Not to mention that it would kinda put me off the "kiss and cuddle" part they seem to like after...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Speaking of money shots , why is it currently in vogue to finish all sex scenes by having the man ejaculate in the mouth and all over the face of the woman ? Does anyone find this a turn-on ?
To me , it 's gross and degrading .
I love looking at nekkid women , but I 'll pass on the blowjob and cum-on-the-face scenes .
Lack of empathy , I guess.Not to mention that it would kinda put me off the " kiss and cuddle " part they seem to like after.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Speaking of money shots, why is it currently in vogue to finish all sex scenes by having the man ejaculate in the mouth and all over the face of the woman?Does anyone find this a turn-on?
To me, it's gross and degrading.
I love looking at nekkid women, but I'll pass on the blowjob and cum-on-the-face scenes.
Lack of empathy, I guess.Not to mention that it would kinda put me off the "kiss and cuddle" part they seem to like after...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757762</id>
	<title>Porn plus Migraines!</title>
	<author>sehlat</author>
	<datestamp>1263384300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This will give a whole new meaning to "Not tonight. I've got a headache."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This will give a whole new meaning to " Not tonight .
I 've got a headache .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will give a whole new meaning to "Not tonight.
I've got a headache.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30762528</id>
	<title>Incredible</title>
	<author>jandersen</author>
	<datestamp>1263471780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The average adult movie costs around $25,000 to $40,000 to make</p></div><p>Wow, do they actually spend that much? You wouldn't have thought so...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The average adult movie costs around $ 25,000 to $ 40,000 to makeWow , do they actually spend that much ?
You would n't have thought so.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The average adult movie costs around $25,000 to $40,000 to makeWow, do they actually spend that much?
You wouldn't have thought so...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757160</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>NoPantsJim</author>
	<datestamp>1263381480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"encumbered by eyewear"
<br> <br>
I have never, ever done anything while watching porn that would have been encumbered by eyewear. I can't speak for everyone though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" encumbered by eyewear " I have never , ever done anything while watching porn that would have been encumbered by eyewear .
I ca n't speak for everyone though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"encumbered by eyewear"
 
I have never, ever done anything while watching porn that would have been encumbered by eyewear.
I can't speak for everyone though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759892</id>
	<title>Glasses need to be bigger</title>
	<author>backslashdot</author>
	<datestamp>1263395100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They need to make the glass lens bigger because I can see the surroundings outside the glasses and it's annoying. Either that or bring the lens closer to the eye. Maybe even contacts?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They need to make the glass lens bigger because I can see the surroundings outside the glasses and it 's annoying .
Either that or bring the lens closer to the eye .
Maybe even contacts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They need to make the glass lens bigger because I can see the surroundings outside the glasses and it's annoying.
Either that or bring the lens closer to the eye.
Maybe even contacts?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759272</id>
	<title>Your Girlfriend != Women Everywhere</title>
	<author>Zero\_\_Kelvin</author>
	<datestamp>1263390900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"He also said "the experience is COMING"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... That suggests to me that the way it's envisioned, 3D will meet the prerequisites for the female of the species (an increasingly large demographic)."</p></div></blockquote><p>I think you are falsely concluding that your girlfriends discovery that the only way she is coming is by watching porn is some phenomenon happening on a grander scale.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" He also said " the experience is COMING " ... That suggests to me that the way it 's envisioned , 3D will meet the prerequisites for the female of the species ( an increasingly large demographic ) .
" I think you are falsely concluding that your girlfriends discovery that the only way she is coming is by watching porn is some phenomenon happening on a grander scale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"He also said "the experience is COMING" ... That suggests to me that the way it's envisioned, 3D will meet the prerequisites for the female of the species (an increasingly large demographic).
"I think you are falsely concluding that your girlfriends discovery that the only way she is coming is by watching porn is some phenomenon happening on a grander scale.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757710</id>
	<title>Here...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263384000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>people don't want to be encumbered by <b>underwear</b> when viewing a film, says Joone."</p></div><p>Fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>people do n't want to be encumbered by underwear when viewing a film , says Joone .
" Fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>people don't want to be encumbered by underwear when viewing a film, says Joone.
"Fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758944</id>
	<title>Re:I think</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1263389220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The need for glasses with straps holding them to your head would be a requirement</p></div><p>What's that you say? Strap-ons?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The need for glasses with straps holding them to your head would be a requirementWhat 's that you say ?
Strap-ons ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The need for glasses with straps holding them to your head would be a requirementWhat's that you say?
Strap-ons?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756842</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759606</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1263392820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Who in their right mind would actually buy a 3D tv that required you to wear glasses while viewing. That's absurd.</p></div><p>If you want stereo right now, that's the only way you're going to get it.  Stereo monitors that don't require glasses look like ass.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who in their right mind would actually buy a 3D tv that required you to wear glasses while viewing .
That 's absurd.If you want stereo right now , that 's the only way you 're going to get it .
Stereo monitors that do n't require glasses look like ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who in their right mind would actually buy a 3D tv that required you to wear glasses while viewing.
That's absurd.If you want stereo right now, that's the only way you're going to get it.
Stereo monitors that don't require glasses look like ass.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757452</id>
	<title>The porn industry needs to stick to fundamentals</title>
	<author>GodfatherofSoul</author>
	<datestamp>1263382740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, like keeping the camera in focus and not moving around and getting the camera guy to shut up?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , like keeping the camera in focus and not moving around and getting the camera guy to shut up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, like keeping the camera in focus and not moving around and getting the camera guy to shut up?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758216</id>
	<title>Re:Oh God</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1263386220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Think of the "money" shot...shudder."</p><p>3D will revolutionize endoscope porn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Think of the " money " shot...shudder .
" 3D will revolutionize endoscope porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Think of the "money" shot...shudder.
"3D will revolutionize endoscope porn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757466</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking of money shots...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263382860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Same here, it's definitively a turn-off. But it's not because it's degrading; I simply only enjoy scenes where the woman is getting pleasure. Men are a necessary annoyance in porn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Same here , it 's definitively a turn-off .
But it 's not because it 's degrading ; I simply only enjoy scenes where the woman is getting pleasure .
Men are a necessary annoyance in porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same here, it's definitively a turn-off.
But it's not because it's degrading; I simply only enjoy scenes where the woman is getting pleasure.
Men are a necessary annoyance in porn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756980</id>
	<title>Re:Oh God</title>
	<author>meclamar</author>
	<datestamp>1263380640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You'll poke your eye out!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll poke your eye out !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll poke your eye out!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758798</id>
	<title>Re:Triple D</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263388560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And here I thought that Double D was more than enough.</p></div><p>Does this mean we can finally watch Eccentrica Gallumbits in all her glory?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And here I thought that Double D was more than enough.Does this mean we can finally watch Eccentrica Gallumbits in all her glory ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And here I thought that Double D was more than enough.Does this mean we can finally watch Eccentrica Gallumbits in all her glory?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757912</id>
	<title>I don't see the problem</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1263385020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>But Joone thinks the biggest hurdle for 3D isn't so much the cost as the glasses: people don't want to be encumbered by eyewear when viewing a film</i> On the bright side, the glasses DO keep you from getting stuff in your eyes!</htmltext>
<tokenext>But Joone thinks the biggest hurdle for 3D is n't so much the cost as the glasses : people do n't want to be encumbered by eyewear when viewing a film On the bright side , the glasses DO keep you from getting stuff in your eyes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But Joone thinks the biggest hurdle for 3D isn't so much the cost as the glasses: people don't want to be encumbered by eyewear when viewing a film On the bright side, the glasses DO keep you from getting stuff in your eyes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757238</id>
	<title>Misery, Suffering and Addiction in 3D!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263381840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow. Now the fantasy can be even more real! Men can squander their lives away in fruitless masturbation in a world of even greater pain!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
Now the fantasy can be even more real !
Men can squander their lives away in fruitless masturbation in a world of even greater pain !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
Now the fantasy can be even more real!
Men can squander their lives away in fruitless masturbation in a world of even greater pain!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757744</id>
	<title>Re:Who cares about eyeglasses!?</title>
	<author>afidel</author>
	<datestamp>1263384180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The extra cost is broken into three areas, the expensive freaking projectors that have to be bought for each 3D screen, the loss rate on the glasses, and some additional profit to pay for the higher production costs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The extra cost is broken into three areas , the expensive freaking projectors that have to be bought for each 3D screen , the loss rate on the glasses , and some additional profit to pay for the higher production costs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The extra cost is broken into three areas, the expensive freaking projectors that have to be bought for each 3D screen, the loss rate on the glasses, and some additional profit to pay for the higher production costs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756920</id>
	<title>Re:Encumbered by eyeware?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263380340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this spin on the "touch yourself and go blind" myth?</p><p>If so its pretty clever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this spin on the " touch yourself and go blind " myth ? If so its pretty clever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this spin on the "touch yourself and go blind" myth?If so its pretty clever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30762668</id>
	<title>Re:Penetration</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263473760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>hehe, he said "penetration"!</p></div><p>that is what I was going to comment on.</p><p>I rarely post comments, but that was too funny.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>hehe , he said " penetration " ! that is what I was going to comment on.I rarely post comments , but that was too funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hehe, he said "penetration"!that is what I was going to comment on.I rarely post comments, but that was too funny.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756842</id>
	<title>I think</title>
	<author>popeye44</author>
	<datestamp>1263380040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The need for glasses with straps holding them to your head would be a requirement.<br>You know.. with all that shaking going on the glasses will come right off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The need for glasses with straps holding them to your head would be a requirement.You know.. with all that shaking going on the glasses will come right off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The need for glasses with straps holding them to your head would be a requirement.You know.. with all that shaking going on the glasses will come right off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758816</id>
	<title>Re:Penetration</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263388680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hehe I know<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<br>I'd really love to see that "market penetration of 3D" 8p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hehe I know : ) I 'd really love to see that " market penetration of 3D " 8p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hehe I know :)I'd really love to see that "market penetration of 3D" 8p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757506</id>
	<title>domain rush</title>
	<author>drougie</author>
	<datestamp>1263383100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now's the time to beat the squatter rush and register 3d fapping-related domains before The Man grabs them all. I came up with 3dfap.com which I could use, I suppose, both in case I decide to "reenter" the scene or alternatively for regular emailing as people who know what it means would not be offended by it and those who don't know what it is don't know what it is and 3dfap's nice and short, nice ring to it.</p><p>Any ophthalmologists care to weigh in on whether chronic eye crossing is risky? And if so any lawyers want to weigh in on whether 3d fapping sites should post health risks warnings?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now 's the time to beat the squatter rush and register 3d fapping-related domains before The Man grabs them all .
I came up with 3dfap.com which I could use , I suppose , both in case I decide to " reenter " the scene or alternatively for regular emailing as people who know what it means would not be offended by it and those who do n't know what it is do n't know what it is and 3dfap 's nice and short , nice ring to it.Any ophthalmologists care to weigh in on whether chronic eye crossing is risky ?
And if so any lawyers want to weigh in on whether 3d fapping sites should post health risks warnings ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now's the time to beat the squatter rush and register 3d fapping-related domains before The Man grabs them all.
I came up with 3dfap.com which I could use, I suppose, both in case I decide to "reenter" the scene or alternatively for regular emailing as people who know what it means would not be offended by it and those who don't know what it is don't know what it is and 3dfap's nice and short, nice ring to it.Any ophthalmologists care to weigh in on whether chronic eye crossing is risky?
And if so any lawyers want to weigh in on whether 3d fapping sites should post health risks warnings?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757166</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263381480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you do get 3D TV without glasses. has not hit the mainstream though.<br>A sheet of tiny lenticules is fixed onto a high-resolution LCD display in such a way that each eye sees a slightly different view of each image pixel. The effect is akin to those 3-D plastic postcards that look a bit like a hologram if you view them at the correct angle.<br>http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech\_and\_web/gadgets\_and\_gaming/article5054247.ece</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you do get 3D TV without glasses .
has not hit the mainstream though.A sheet of tiny lenticules is fixed onto a high-resolution LCD display in such a way that each eye sees a slightly different view of each image pixel .
The effect is akin to those 3-D plastic postcards that look a bit like a hologram if you view them at the correct angle.http : //technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech \ _and \ _web/gadgets \ _and \ _gaming/article5054247.ece</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you do get 3D TV without glasses.
has not hit the mainstream though.A sheet of tiny lenticules is fixed onto a high-resolution LCD display in such a way that each eye sees a slightly different view of each image pixel.
The effect is akin to those 3-D plastic postcards that look a bit like a hologram if you view them at the correct angle.http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech\_and\_web/gadgets\_and\_gaming/article5054247.ece</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757028</id>
	<title>Re:Penetration</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263380880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>hehe, he said "penetration"!</p></div><p>I'm a lesbian you insensitive clod!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>hehe , he said " penetration " ! I 'm a lesbian you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hehe, he said "penetration"!I'm a lesbian you insensitive clod!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757676</id>
	<title>Nice...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263383820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The 3D porn experience is coming"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The 3D porn experience is coming "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The 3D porn experience is coming"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756774</id>
	<title>Been done</title>
	<author>slim</author>
	<datestamp>1263379680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1969's <a href="http://www.thestewardesses.com/?go=history" title="thestewardesses.com">The Stewardesses</a> [thestewardesses.com] ("See the lusty stewardesses leap from the screen to your lap") "is the most profitable 3-D film in history" (Avatar may now have beaten it).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1969 's The Stewardesses [ thestewardesses.com ] ( " See the lusty stewardesses leap from the screen to your lap " ) " is the most profitable 3-D film in history " ( Avatar may now have beaten it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1969's The Stewardesses [thestewardesses.com] ("See the lusty stewardesses leap from the screen to your lap") "is the most profitable 3-D film in history" (Avatar may now have beaten it).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759490</id>
	<title>The Bastards!</title>
	<author>Zero\_\_Kelvin</author>
	<datestamp>1263392160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"Maybe all this technology will have the unintended consequence of turning people away from porn."</p></div></blockquote><p>That doesn't seem likely.  They trick everyone into watching it now.  New technology will merely give them even more of an upper hand in tricking unwitting men into accidentally watching it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Maybe all this technology will have the unintended consequence of turning people away from porn .
" That does n't seem likely .
They trick everyone into watching it now .
New technology will merely give them even more of an upper hand in tricking unwitting men into accidentally watching it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Maybe all this technology will have the unintended consequence of turning people away from porn.
"That doesn't seem likely.
They trick everyone into watching it now.
New technology will merely give them even more of an upper hand in tricking unwitting men into accidentally watching it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757530</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30764844</id>
	<title>The average adult movie costs around $25,000 to $4</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263487140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The average adult movie costs around $25,000 to $40,000 to make"</p><p>I could finance an adult movie if they are this cheap to make. They must be paying the actors and actresses pennies. This must be a mistake.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The average adult movie costs around $ 25,000 to $ 40,000 to make " I could finance an adult movie if they are this cheap to make .
They must be paying the actors and actresses pennies .
This must be a mistake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The average adult movie costs around $25,000 to $40,000 to make"I could finance an adult movie if they are this cheap to make.
They must be paying the actors and actresses pennies.
This must be a mistake.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756876</id>
	<title>When did they ask?</title>
	<author>EriktheGreen</author>
	<datestamp>1263380160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I'd have said the same thing before going to "Avatar" in 3d.  The usual litany of anti-3d excuses would apply:
</p><ul>
<li> The glasses give me headaches</li>
<li>The colors aren't right</li>
<li>They'll rub on my nose/ears and hurt</li>
<li>They'll distort the screen</li>
</ul><p>
I think this is mostly due to hollywood/tech companies chasing the holy grail of 3d for a long time.  Many, many vendors have sold products based on claims of "true 3d images" including some spectacularly bad products like the virtual boy or NVidia's attempt at 3d with LCD shutter glasses.
</p><p>
But with the current crop of tech, they've finally made it useable.  The glasses I used actually improved the colors, and the film was bright enough not to notice the slight darkening due to the glasses.
</p><p>
After the first 15 minutes of viewing Avatar with the dark glasses (RealD 3D) on, I wouldn't want to watch it any other way.
</p><p>
If you haven't seen Avatar in 3D, do so.  Very worth it, and I hope other films are made that way soon.  I actually made a joke about wanting to see a 3D porn film on the way out of the theater ("we'd be ducking every time the male lead stood up facing the screen").
</p><p>
Erik</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd have said the same thing before going to " Avatar " in 3d .
The usual litany of anti-3d excuses would apply : The glasses give me headaches The colors are n't right They 'll rub on my nose/ears and hurt They 'll distort the screen I think this is mostly due to hollywood/tech companies chasing the holy grail of 3d for a long time .
Many , many vendors have sold products based on claims of " true 3d images " including some spectacularly bad products like the virtual boy or NVidia 's attempt at 3d with LCD shutter glasses .
But with the current crop of tech , they 've finally made it useable .
The glasses I used actually improved the colors , and the film was bright enough not to notice the slight darkening due to the glasses .
After the first 15 minutes of viewing Avatar with the dark glasses ( RealD 3D ) on , I would n't want to watch it any other way .
If you have n't seen Avatar in 3D , do so .
Very worth it , and I hope other films are made that way soon .
I actually made a joke about wanting to see a 3D porn film on the way out of the theater ( " we 'd be ducking every time the male lead stood up facing the screen " ) .
Erik</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I'd have said the same thing before going to "Avatar" in 3d.
The usual litany of anti-3d excuses would apply:

 The glasses give me headaches
The colors aren't right
They'll rub on my nose/ears and hurt
They'll distort the screen

I think this is mostly due to hollywood/tech companies chasing the holy grail of 3d for a long time.
Many, many vendors have sold products based on claims of "true 3d images" including some spectacularly bad products like the virtual boy or NVidia's attempt at 3d with LCD shutter glasses.
But with the current crop of tech, they've finally made it useable.
The glasses I used actually improved the colors, and the film was bright enough not to notice the slight darkening due to the glasses.
After the first 15 minutes of viewing Avatar with the dark glasses (RealD 3D) on, I wouldn't want to watch it any other way.
If you haven't seen Avatar in 3D, do so.
Very worth it, and I hope other films are made that way soon.
I actually made a joke about wanting to see a 3D porn film on the way out of the theater ("we'd be ducking every time the male lead stood up facing the screen").
Erik</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760490</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>FauxReal</author>
	<datestamp>1263400560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The thing is, while wearing the glasses you might not know you've been caught until after you take them off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is , while wearing the glasses you might not know you 've been caught until after you take them off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is, while wearing the glasses you might not know you've been caught until after you take them off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30762016</id>
	<title>HDTV for porn was bad enough</title>
	<author>VShael</author>
	<datestamp>1263463920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>when you could see every blemish (sometimes even the internal ones) on the models body.</p><p>Who wants that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>when you could see every blemish ( sometimes even the internal ones ) on the models body.Who wants that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when you could see every blemish (sometimes even the internal ones) on the models body.Who wants that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756976</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>slim</author>
	<datestamp>1263380580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the intention is that 3D TVs are not significantly more expensive than ordinary TVs -- all the display needs is to be able to update at 60FPS (for a 30FPS 3D movie).</p><p>The glasses synchronise with the image source, to flicker in sync.</p><p>A story about PS3 3D games recently said that some existing retail TVs can display at 120FPS, such that 60FPS 3D games are possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the intention is that 3D TVs are not significantly more expensive than ordinary TVs -- all the display needs is to be able to update at 60FPS ( for a 30FPS 3D movie ) .The glasses synchronise with the image source , to flicker in sync.A story about PS3 3D games recently said that some existing retail TVs can display at 120FPS , such that 60FPS 3D games are possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the intention is that 3D TVs are not significantly more expensive than ordinary TVs -- all the display needs is to be able to update at 60FPS (for a 30FPS 3D movie).The glasses synchronise with the image source, to flicker in sync.A story about PS3 3D games recently said that some existing retail TVs can display at 120FPS, such that 60FPS 3D games are possible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757104</id>
	<title>Wait why are they Tiptoeing?</title>
	<author>jocabergs</author>
	<datestamp>1263381120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why are they tiptoeing, I say "tally-ho, brave porn providers".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are they tiptoeing , I say " tally-ho , brave porn providers " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why are they tiptoeing, I say "tally-ho, brave porn providers".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760434</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking of money shots...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263400140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's probably what most viewers want. Money shots are all about the money. You're probably not aware of it but if you google for porn, you can actually find some on the Internet and if you do, you might also find out that it's being made for fetishes that most people cannot even imagine (let alone want to) and if what you describe is the norm, it's obviously what most viewers want (instead of "two Japanese girls puking in each others' mouths", to quote South Park but it is undoubtedly available for real too, I'd say).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's probably what most viewers want .
Money shots are all about the money .
You 're probably not aware of it but if you google for porn , you can actually find some on the Internet and if you do , you might also find out that it 's being made for fetishes that most people can not even imagine ( let alone want to ) and if what you describe is the norm , it 's obviously what most viewers want ( instead of " two Japanese girls puking in each others ' mouths " , to quote South Park but it is undoubtedly available for real too , I 'd say ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's probably what most viewers want.
Money shots are all about the money.
You're probably not aware of it but if you google for porn, you can actually find some on the Internet and if you do, you might also find out that it's being made for fetishes that most people cannot even imagine (let alone want to) and if what you describe is the norm, it's obviously what most viewers want (instead of "two Japanese girls puking in each others' mouths", to quote South Park but it is undoubtedly available for real too, I'd say).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756794</id>
	<title>Surely more could have been done with this title!</title>
	<author>d34dluk3</author>
	<datestamp>1263379800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like "Porn Industry Vigorously Enters 3D Video Market" </p><p>Or maybe timothy has a foot fetish?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like " Porn Industry Vigorously Enters 3D Video Market " Or maybe timothy has a foot fetish ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like "Porn Industry Vigorously Enters 3D Video Market" Or maybe timothy has a foot fetish?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757352</id>
	<title>Re:why would it cost 30\% more to make porn in 3D?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263382380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also these are LOW (think sub 100k) budget.  So an additional 10k in hw/setup/time/etc on a 40k movie is 30\% more.</p><p>They do low low low budget as they only press maybe 5k-10k total units.  With a 'high budget of 50k movie they only need to sell 3500 or so to ROI.  Everything else is gravy.  If they get a 'hit' with one they can just press more.  It is an oversaturated market.  As any dope with a video camera can make one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also these are LOW ( think sub 100k ) budget .
So an additional 10k in hw/setup/time/etc on a 40k movie is 30 \ % more.They do low low low budget as they only press maybe 5k-10k total units .
With a 'high budget of 50k movie they only need to sell 3500 or so to ROI .
Everything else is gravy .
If they get a 'hit ' with one they can just press more .
It is an oversaturated market .
As any dope with a video camera can make one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also these are LOW (think sub 100k) budget.
So an additional 10k in hw/setup/time/etc on a 40k movie is 30\% more.They do low low low budget as they only press maybe 5k-10k total units.
With a 'high budget of 50k movie they only need to sell 3500 or so to ROI.
Everything else is gravy.
If they get a 'hit' with one they can just press more.
It is an oversaturated market.
As any dope with a video camera can make one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759298</id>
	<title>Re:Been done</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263391080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the movie title can be typed with one hand.  Just like porn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the movie title can be typed with one hand .
Just like porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the movie title can be typed with one hand.
Just like porn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757782</id>
	<title>Why do you need a 3D?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263384360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>why the need for a 3D tv if you already have to wear glasses? can't a normal tv show a picture that can be filtered by 2 different lenses, like regular film projectors do for 3d movies?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why the need for a 3D tv if you already have to wear glasses ?
ca n't a normal tv show a picture that can be filtered by 2 different lenses , like regular film projectors do for 3d movies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why the need for a 3D tv if you already have to wear glasses?
can't a normal tv show a picture that can be filtered by 2 different lenses, like regular film projectors do for 3d movies?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760218</id>
	<title>They look like ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1263398100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... you could just reach out and touch them.
</p><p>For $50.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... you could just reach out and touch them .
For $ 50 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... you could just reach out and touch them.
For $50.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757204</id>
	<title>Re:Penetration height?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263381660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Even your average Slashdot user knows that penetration is measured in terms of depth, not height.</p></div><p>I don't know... I tend to measure it more in terms of length.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even your average Slashdot user knows that penetration is measured in terms of depth , not height.I do n't know... I tend to measure it more in terms of length .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even your average Slashdot user knows that penetration is measured in terms of depth, not height.I don't know... I tend to measure it more in terms of length.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758466</id>
	<title>3D doesn't work well in porn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263387180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As someone who has worked in the industry, I can tell you the real problem is technical, not financial (though that's a helluva factor too). 3D works best at a distance -- who wants to watch porn filmed from 15 feet away? Porn is a closeup business and 3D can be hard to pull off up close. Yes, feel free to make puns with that sentence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As someone who has worked in the industry , I can tell you the real problem is technical , not financial ( though that 's a helluva factor too ) .
3D works best at a distance -- who wants to watch porn filmed from 15 feet away ?
Porn is a closeup business and 3D can be hard to pull off up close .
Yes , feel free to make puns with that sentence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As someone who has worked in the industry, I can tell you the real problem is technical, not financial (though that's a helluva factor too).
3D works best at a distance -- who wants to watch porn filmed from 15 feet away?
Porn is a closeup business and 3D can be hard to pull off up close.
Yes, feel free to make puns with that sentence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757530</id>
	<title>Not for me.</title>
	<author>MaWeiTao</author>
	<datestamp>1263383220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Many, if not most women in porn look pretty horrid what with the bruises, embarrassing tattoos and plastic surgery. They'll look great in one photoshoot and everywhere else they look like a drug-addled 2 dollar whore. On top of that we have to endure guys getting in the way of the action with closeups of their scrotums flopping around like a fish out of water. HD is already a problem for porn, 3D will only make things worse although at this point in the game it's more a gimmick than anything.</p><p>Maybe all this technology will have the unintended consequence of turning people away from porn. Your average girl is more attractive than most porn stars. And with a real girl you're not usually exposed to someone who's been pounded into oblivion, viewing everything in extreme closeup.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Many , if not most women in porn look pretty horrid what with the bruises , embarrassing tattoos and plastic surgery .
They 'll look great in one photoshoot and everywhere else they look like a drug-addled 2 dollar whore .
On top of that we have to endure guys getting in the way of the action with closeups of their scrotums flopping around like a fish out of water .
HD is already a problem for porn , 3D will only make things worse although at this point in the game it 's more a gimmick than anything.Maybe all this technology will have the unintended consequence of turning people away from porn .
Your average girl is more attractive than most porn stars .
And with a real girl you 're not usually exposed to someone who 's been pounded into oblivion , viewing everything in extreme closeup .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many, if not most women in porn look pretty horrid what with the bruises, embarrassing tattoos and plastic surgery.
They'll look great in one photoshoot and everywhere else they look like a drug-addled 2 dollar whore.
On top of that we have to endure guys getting in the way of the action with closeups of their scrotums flopping around like a fish out of water.
HD is already a problem for porn, 3D will only make things worse although at this point in the game it's more a gimmick than anything.Maybe all this technology will have the unintended consequence of turning people away from porn.
Your average girl is more attractive than most porn stars.
And with a real girl you're not usually exposed to someone who's been pounded into oblivion, viewing everything in extreme closeup.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30761764</id>
	<title>Re:When did they ask?</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1263502740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My problem with current RealD technology is that I always manage to get the most dirty or stained glasses in the cinema...</p><p>However that will be diffeent when I get my 3D TV at home... now talking about porn movies and dirty glasses uhmm...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My problem with current RealD technology is that I always manage to get the most dirty or stained glasses in the cinema...However that will be diffeent when I get my 3D TV at home... now talking about porn movies and dirty glasses uhmm.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My problem with current RealD technology is that I always manage to get the most dirty or stained glasses in the cinema...However that will be diffeent when I get my 3D TV at home... now talking about porn movies and dirty glasses uhmm...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756742</id>
	<title>Market Penetration</title>
	<author>d34dluk3</author>
	<datestamp>1263379560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't that what his whole industry is based on?</p><p>(Read 'market' as a verb).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that what his whole industry is based on ?
( Read 'market ' as a verb ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that what his whole industry is based on?
(Read 'market' as a verb).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30765756</id>
	<title>Feelyvision</title>
	<author>jman.org</author>
	<datestamp>1263490020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What else besides glasses would one have to wear?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What else besides glasses would one have to wear ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What else besides glasses would one have to wear?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760804</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking of money shots...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263403680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Speaking of money shots, why is it currently in vogue to finish all sex scenes by having the man ejaculate in the mouth and all over the face of the woman?

Does anyone find this a turn-on? To me, it's gross and degrading. I love looking at nekkid women, but I'll pass on the blowjob and cum-on-the-face scenes. Lack of empathy, I guess.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

Clearly plenty of people do find it hot, or else, by some bizarre survival of the fittest, or supply and demand, or whatever you want to call it, there would not be so many facials in porn.  The fact that so many such titles are successful somehow proves that there is a demand for them.  If the market truly didn't want facials, they'd put their dollars in all the creampie flicks, or whatever other alternative.<br> <br>

I wouldn't say this is that new of a trend though.  Even porn in the 70's had plenty of facials.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Speaking of money shots , why is it currently in vogue to finish all sex scenes by having the man ejaculate in the mouth and all over the face of the woman ?
Does anyone find this a turn-on ?
To me , it 's gross and degrading .
I love looking at nekkid women , but I 'll pass on the blowjob and cum-on-the-face scenes .
Lack of empathy , I guess .
Clearly plenty of people do find it hot , or else , by some bizarre survival of the fittest , or supply and demand , or whatever you want to call it , there would not be so many facials in porn .
The fact that so many such titles are successful somehow proves that there is a demand for them .
If the market truly did n't want facials , they 'd put their dollars in all the creampie flicks , or whatever other alternative .
I would n't say this is that new of a trend though .
Even porn in the 70 's had plenty of facials .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Speaking of money shots, why is it currently in vogue to finish all sex scenes by having the man ejaculate in the mouth and all over the face of the woman?
Does anyone find this a turn-on?
To me, it's gross and degrading.
I love looking at nekkid women, but I'll pass on the blowjob and cum-on-the-face scenes.
Lack of empathy, I guess.
Clearly plenty of people do find it hot, or else, by some bizarre survival of the fittest, or supply and demand, or whatever you want to call it, there would not be so many facials in porn.
The fact that so many such titles are successful somehow proves that there is a demand for them.
If the market truly didn't want facials, they'd put their dollars in all the creampie flicks, or whatever other alternative.
I wouldn't say this is that new of a trend though.
Even porn in the 70's had plenty of facials.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756858</id>
	<title>Encumbered by eyeware?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263380100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Surely people who watch porn regularly will already need glasses</htmltext>
<tokenext>Surely people who watch porn regularly will already need glasses</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surely people who watch porn regularly will already need glasses</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757822</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking of money shots...</title>
	<author>Knara</author>
	<datestamp>1263384600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"currently in vogue"?
</p><p>I think you mean "been standard since the beginning of the modern age of porn."  It's so standard that internal cum shots ("cream pies") are a fetish area in adult videos
</p><p>And while you may find it gross and degrading, not a small number of people, men and women, think its hot.
</p><p>So, um... enjoy your softcore porn, I guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" currently in vogue " ?
I think you mean " been standard since the beginning of the modern age of porn .
" It 's so standard that internal cum shots ( " cream pies " ) are a fetish area in adult videos And while you may find it gross and degrading , not a small number of people , men and women , think its hot .
So , um... enjoy your softcore porn , I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"currently in vogue"?
I think you mean "been standard since the beginning of the modern age of porn.
"  It's so standard that internal cum shots ("cream pies") are a fetish area in adult videos
And while you may find it gross and degrading, not a small number of people, men and women, think its hot.
So, um... enjoy your softcore porn, I guess.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757314</id>
	<title>Re:Penetration</title>
	<author>houstonbofh</author>
	<datestamp>1263382200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am surprised that he did not mention the market penetration into both traditional porn markets, and high tech early adopters.  That type of dual penetration could be highly profitable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am surprised that he did not mention the market penetration into both traditional porn markets , and high tech early adopters .
That type of dual penetration could be highly profitable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am surprised that he did not mention the market penetration into both traditional porn markets, and high tech early adopters.
That type of dual penetration could be highly profitable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757640</id>
	<title>Re:When did they ask?</title>
	<author>fahrbot-bot</author>
	<datestamp>1263383700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>After the first 15 minutes of viewing Avatar with the dark glasses (RealD 3D) on, I wouldn't want to watch it any other way.

If you haven't seen Avatar in 3D, do so.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
I first saw Avatar in 3D and the effect was very good, but it really didn't add *that* much to the experience.  I saw again today in 2D and it was better.  The visuals were brighter, clearer and there was much more apparent color and detail.
</p><p>
I will resist seeing movies in 3D from now on in favor of the 2D version.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>After the first 15 minutes of viewing Avatar with the dark glasses ( RealD 3D ) on , I would n't want to watch it any other way .
If you have n't seen Avatar in 3D , do so .
I first saw Avatar in 3D and the effect was very good , but it really did n't add * that * much to the experience .
I saw again today in 2D and it was better .
The visuals were brighter , clearer and there was much more apparent color and detail .
I will resist seeing movies in 3D from now on in favor of the 2D version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After the first 15 minutes of viewing Avatar with the dark glasses (RealD 3D) on, I wouldn't want to watch it any other way.
If you haven't seen Avatar in 3D, do so.
I first saw Avatar in 3D and the effect was very good, but it really didn't add *that* much to the experience.
I saw again today in 2D and it was better.
The visuals were brighter, clearer and there was much more apparent color and detail.
I will resist seeing movies in 3D from now on in favor of the 2D version.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30762400</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1263470280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Who in their right mind would actually buy a 3D tv that required you to wear glasses while viewing. That's absurd.</i></p><p>Yes.  Clearly we should all be rushing out and getting ones that don't require you to wear glasses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who in their right mind would actually buy a 3D tv that required you to wear glasses while viewing .
That 's absurd.Yes .
Clearly we should all be rushing out and getting ones that do n't require you to wear glasses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who in their right mind would actually buy a 3D tv that required you to wear glasses while viewing.
That's absurd.Yes.
Clearly we should all be rushing out and getting ones that don't require you to wear glasses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757608</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263383580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*pre-self-whooshes-himself*</p><p>This tells more about you than about the topic,that your thoughts revolved around &ldquo;getting caught&ldquo;.</p><p>Your problem is expressed by this:</p><p><div class="quote"><p> My sister caught me jacking off the other week and calls me a pervert<br>
&nbsp; just the other day i walked into my room and caught my sister masturbating<br>
&nbsp; So she calls me a pervert again?!?<br>
&nbsp; there is no justice in the world...</p></div><p>And the real problem below, is that you buy into their reality. A reality with on top of it all is also a double standard.</p><p>When I am in my home, am naked, watch porn, or do other...stuff..., the rule is: If you see me, I first get to decide if I like it or not. If not, you are the wrongdoer, and if you do not stop, you&rsquo;re the pervert.<br>Then when I like it, and you don&rsquo;t... <em>look away</em>! Damnit, is in that hard?</p><p>Interesting fact: If you want to know what the <em>natural</em> reaction to openly visible sex (alone or with others) would be, just look at how people react to dogs or other animals doing it. They are a bit surprised, laugh a bit, are a bit curious, but then just stop caring. In fact it&rsquo;s so natural, that it&rsquo;s no problem showing it on TV. And when your grandma sees the dogs doing it, she bursts out in laughter.<br>Now you can see, how twisted our reaction is. And the best thing is, that most people do not even really think in that twisted way. They just act like that as soon as they notice that society expects them to react that way. You can see it in the first blink of an eye.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Maybe the problem is also a huge lack in self-confidence is the own sense of reality, even when people know better.<br>I stand by it. Fuck the curtains! ^^</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>* pre-self-whooshes-himself * This tells more about you than about the topic,that your thoughts revolved around    getting caught    .Your problem is expressed by this : My sister caught me jacking off the other week and calls me a pervert   just the other day i walked into my room and caught my sister masturbating   So she calls me a pervert again ? ! ?
  there is no justice in the world...And the real problem below , is that you buy into their reality .
A reality with on top of it all is also a double standard.When I am in my home , am naked , watch porn , or do other...stuff... , the rule is : If you see me , I first get to decide if I like it or not .
If not , you are the wrongdoer , and if you do not stop , you    re the pervert.Then when I like it , and you don    t... look away !
Damnit , is in that hard ? Interesting fact : If you want to know what the natural reaction to openly visible sex ( alone or with others ) would be , just look at how people react to dogs or other animals doing it .
They are a bit surprised , laugh a bit , are a bit curious , but then just stop caring .
In fact it    s so natural , that it    s no problem showing it on TV .
And when your grandma sees the dogs doing it , she bursts out in laughter.Now you can see , how twisted our reaction is .
And the best thing is , that most people do not even really think in that twisted way .
They just act like that as soon as they notice that society expects them to react that way .
You can see it in the first blink of an eye .
: ) Maybe the problem is also a huge lack in self-confidence is the own sense of reality , even when people know better.I stand by it .
Fuck the curtains !
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*pre-self-whooshes-himself*This tells more about you than about the topic,that your thoughts revolved around “getting caught“.Your problem is expressed by this: My sister caught me jacking off the other week and calls me a pervert
  just the other day i walked into my room and caught my sister masturbating
  So she calls me a pervert again?!?
  there is no justice in the world...And the real problem below, is that you buy into their reality.
A reality with on top of it all is also a double standard.When I am in my home, am naked, watch porn, or do other...stuff..., the rule is: If you see me, I first get to decide if I like it or not.
If not, you are the wrongdoer, and if you do not stop, you’re the pervert.Then when I like it, and you don’t... look away!
Damnit, is in that hard?Interesting fact: If you want to know what the natural reaction to openly visible sex (alone or with others) would be, just look at how people react to dogs or other animals doing it.
They are a bit surprised, laugh a bit, are a bit curious, but then just stop caring.
In fact it’s so natural, that it’s no problem showing it on TV.
And when your grandma sees the dogs doing it, she bursts out in laughter.Now you can see, how twisted our reaction is.
And the best thing is, that most people do not even really think in that twisted way.
They just act like that as soon as they notice that society expects them to react that way.
You can see it in the first blink of an eye.
:)Maybe the problem is also a huge lack in self-confidence is the own sense of reality, even when people know better.I stand by it.
Fuck the curtains!
^^
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30762438</id>
	<title>Re:30,000-40,000???!!!</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1263470880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The porn that I've researched seems to have been made on a sub-$1,000 budget, how are they spending so much money!?</i></p><p>They're talking mainstream stuff with well known stars who can demand much higher rates because of their name recognition.  Given the high cost of equipment for doing this kind of stuff right now, only the studios who are going to sell 20,000+ copies of a $25+ DVD are going to be interested in this, and you only get those kinds of sales if you have people buying because they're fans of one of your stars.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The porn that I 've researched seems to have been made on a sub- $ 1,000 budget , how are they spending so much money !
? They 're talking mainstream stuff with well known stars who can demand much higher rates because of their name recognition .
Given the high cost of equipment for doing this kind of stuff right now , only the studios who are going to sell 20,000 + copies of a $ 25 + DVD are going to be interested in this , and you only get those kinds of sales if you have people buying because they 're fans of one of your stars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The porn that I've researched seems to have been made on a sub-$1,000 budget, how are they spending so much money!
?They're talking mainstream stuff with well known stars who can demand much higher rates because of their name recognition.
Given the high cost of equipment for doing this kind of stuff right now, only the studios who are going to sell 20,000+ copies of a $25+ DVD are going to be interested in this, and you only get those kinds of sales if you have people buying because they're fans of one of your stars.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30765524</id>
	<title>Re:Penetration height?!</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1263489240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know how those Smiths are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know how those Smiths are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know how those Smiths are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758710</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>bughunter</author>
	<datestamp>1263388200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>That's certainly what people fear most: getting caught wearing glasses while watching porn.</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>It's more like getting caught <i>because</i> one is wearing glasses.</p><p>Some of us must remain as vigilant as possible while "watching porn," and find it essential that "watching porn" require the minimum amount of potentially incriminating paraphernalia as possible.</p><p>Yeah, it sucks, but wattayagonnado?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's certainly what people fear most : getting caught wearing glasses while watching porn .
It 's more like getting caught because one is wearing glasses.Some of us must remain as vigilant as possible while " watching porn , " and find it essential that " watching porn " require the minimum amount of potentially incriminating paraphernalia as possible.Yeah , it sucks , but wattayagonnado ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> That's certainly what people fear most: getting caught wearing glasses while watching porn.
It's more like getting caught because one is wearing glasses.Some of us must remain as vigilant as possible while "watching porn," and find it essential that "watching porn" require the minimum amount of potentially incriminating paraphernalia as possible.Yeah, it sucks, but wattayagonnado?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756930</id>
	<title>Re:Oh God</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1263380400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always skip that anyway.  Really, why would I want to see that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always skip that anyway .
Really , why would I want to see that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always skip that anyway.
Really, why would I want to see that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759188</id>
	<title>Re:Jack-off Glasses.</title>
	<author>a0schweitzer</author>
	<datestamp>1263390480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So if you get 'caught', not only do you have to zip up, switch to some innocuous application, but now you also have to rip off and hide 3D glasses?</p></div><p>Unless you watch a different 3D program...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So if you get 'caught ' , not only do you have to zip up , switch to some innocuous application , but now you also have to rip off and hide 3D glasses ? Unless you watch a different 3D program.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if you get 'caught', not only do you have to zip up, switch to some innocuous application, but now you also have to rip off and hide 3D glasses?Unless you watch a different 3D program...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30761204</id>
	<title>Tiptoes?</title>
	<author>Lord\_of\_the\_nerf</author>
	<datestamp>1263408540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More like '3D technology thrusts manfully into the quivering viewer.'</htmltext>
<tokenext>More like '3D technology thrusts manfully into the quivering viewer .
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More like '3D technology thrusts manfully into the quivering viewer.
'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30761478</id>
	<title>leading in</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263411840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://hardware?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //hardware ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://hardware?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757750</id>
	<title>Forget 3D, get VR Now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263384240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seeing it in 3D pales in comparison to haptic feedback.  With <a href="http://realtocuh.com/" title="realtocuh.com" rel="nofollow">RealTouch.com</a> [realtocuh.com] [nsfw] it's as if your in the movie.  It reproduces the motion, heat, wetness, etc on you, synchronized to the video.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seeing it in 3D pales in comparison to haptic feedback .
With RealTouch.com [ realtocuh.com ] [ nsfw ] it 's as if your in the movie .
It reproduces the motion , heat , wetness , etc on you , synchronized to the video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seeing it in 3D pales in comparison to haptic feedback.
With RealTouch.com [realtocuh.com] [nsfw] it's as if your in the movie.
It reproduces the motion, heat, wetness, etc on you, synchronized to the video.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756954</id>
	<title>Re:Penetration</title>
	<author>value\_added</author>
	<datestamp>1263380520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but there's more.  He also said "the experience is COMING" and it's "moving SLOWLY".  That suggests to me that the way it's envisioned, 3D will meet the prerequisites for the female of the species (an increasingly large demographic).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but there 's more .
He also said " the experience is COMING " and it 's " moving SLOWLY " .
That suggests to me that the way it 's envisioned , 3D will meet the prerequisites for the female of the species ( an increasingly large demographic ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but there's more.
He also said "the experience is COMING" and it's "moving SLOWLY".
That suggests to me that the way it's envisioned, 3D will meet the prerequisites for the female of the species (an increasingly large demographic).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757866</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking of money shots...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263384780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I cum in my girlfriend's mouth all the time, and sometimes on her face.</p><p>I especially like pulling it out of her pussy and sticking it in her mouth so she can taste herself.</p><p>She enjoys it too, but the cleanup after a faceblast is a bit of work.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I cum in my girlfriend 's mouth all the time , and sometimes on her face.I especially like pulling it out of her pussy and sticking it in her mouth so she can taste herself.She enjoys it too , but the cleanup after a faceblast is a bit of work .
: -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I cum in my girlfriend's mouth all the time, and sometimes on her face.I especially like pulling it out of her pussy and sticking it in her mouth so she can taste herself.She enjoys it too, but the cleanup after a faceblast is a bit of work.
:-P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757774</id>
	<title>HARDware...</title>
	<author>lophan</author>
	<datestamp>1263384300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obviously the most appropriate category for this article</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously the most appropriate category for this article</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously the most appropriate category for this article</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757186</id>
	<title>Is it a coincidence?</title>
	<author>flabordec</author>
	<datestamp>1263381600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That the only comments (so far) which have been modded up are funny? Is it that as something mixes with porn the potential to make fun of it approaches 1?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That the only comments ( so far ) which have been modded up are funny ?
Is it that as something mixes with porn the potential to make fun of it approaches 1 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That the only comments (so far) which have been modded up are funny?
Is it that as something mixes with porn the potential to make fun of it approaches 1?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30763740</id>
	<title>Re:Penetration height?!</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1263483120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is if you're standing up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is if you 're standing up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is if you're standing up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757526</id>
	<title>Re:Oh God</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1263383160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, yeah, I've seen it coming...</p><p>(just to get that joke out of the way)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , yeah , I 've seen it coming... ( just to get that joke out of the way )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, yeah, I've seen it coming...(just to get that joke out of the way)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757592</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>regularstranger</author>
	<datestamp>1263383580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe there's a market for 3D contact lenses.  Hell, I'd use them for regular 3D movies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe there 's a market for 3D contact lenses .
Hell , I 'd use them for regular 3D movies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe there's a market for 3D contact lenses.
Hell, I'd use them for regular 3D movies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756896</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263380280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Millions of farsighted people buy books that require glasses.  Why should TV be any different?</p><p>(Kidding)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Millions of farsighted people buy books that require glasses .
Why should TV be any different ?
( Kidding )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Millions of farsighted people buy books that require glasses.
Why should TV be any different?
(Kidding)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759370</id>
	<title>Orgazmo quote</title>
	<author>Alter\_3d</author>
	<datestamp>1263391380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Penetration??? Who's going to be penetrated???<br> <br>
-- Joe Young</htmltext>
<tokenext>Penetration ? ? ?
Who 's going to be penetrated ? ? ?
-- Joe Young</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Penetration???
Who's going to be penetrated???
-- Joe Young</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757722</id>
	<title>Re:why would it cost 30\% more to make porn in 3D?</title>
	<author>afidel</author>
	<datestamp>1263384120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I assume reshoots and editing in 3D are more expensive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I assume reshoots and editing in 3D are more expensive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assume reshoots and editing in 3D are more expensive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756982</id>
	<title>Good ol' VeiwFinders</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263380640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that would look a lot like these:<br>http://www.theamssite.com/images/viewfinder.jpg</p><p>I think people want more from 3D than just two 2D images separated by space.</p><p>lol, the CAPTCHA disagrees with me: nonsense</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that would look a lot like these : http : //www.theamssite.com/images/viewfinder.jpgI think people want more from 3D than just two 2D images separated by space.lol , the CAPTCHA disagrees with me : nonsense</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that would look a lot like these:http://www.theamssite.com/images/viewfinder.jpgI think people want more from 3D than just two 2D images separated by space.lol, the CAPTCHA disagrees with me: nonsense</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30763320</id>
	<title>Re:When did they ask?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263480600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This dodging/ducking thing happened to me a very long time ago, in the 80s, watching a 3D movie in the theater near to where I lived, Yes, in the 80s, so this 3D thing is no big deal<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This dodging/ducking thing happened to me a very long time ago , in the 80s , watching a 3D movie in the theater near to where I lived , Yes , in the 80s , so this 3D thing is no big deal .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This dodging/ducking thing happened to me a very long time ago, in the 80s, watching a 3D movie in the theater near to where I lived, Yes, in the 80s, so this 3D thing is no big deal ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757732</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263384180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm <em>always</em> 'encumbered by eyewear', watching a movie or not. Do people really think that those with glasses have it so hard?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm always 'encumbered by eyewear ' , watching a movie or not .
Do people really think that those with glasses have it so hard ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm always 'encumbered by eyewear', watching a movie or not.
Do people really think that those with glasses have it so hard?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30766440</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking of money shots...</title>
	<author>Doctor Faustus</author>
	<datestamp>1263492180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I certainly like to see plenty of detail, the external cumshots are always a big minus for me, because I want to see people enjoying themselves (or at least convincing me that they are), and that's one area that's clearly reducing the guy's sensation.  And half the time, the camera cuts away in between, and I think the cumshot probably wasn't even related to the sex.</p><p>The creampie porn that's been gaining popularity lately is an improvement in that you can see that it was actually the sex that led to the orgasm, but still seems contrived when they freeze to almost pull out and cum just inside the entrance.  I think appeal is supposed to be less about improved realism than just making it raunchier, but it seems like the frothy mess you get from normal unprotected sex would do that better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I certainly like to see plenty of detail , the external cumshots are always a big minus for me , because I want to see people enjoying themselves ( or at least convincing me that they are ) , and that 's one area that 's clearly reducing the guy 's sensation .
And half the time , the camera cuts away in between , and I think the cumshot probably was n't even related to the sex.The creampie porn that 's been gaining popularity lately is an improvement in that you can see that it was actually the sex that led to the orgasm , but still seems contrived when they freeze to almost pull out and cum just inside the entrance .
I think appeal is supposed to be less about improved realism than just making it raunchier , but it seems like the frothy mess you get from normal unprotected sex would do that better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I certainly like to see plenty of detail, the external cumshots are always a big minus for me, because I want to see people enjoying themselves (or at least convincing me that they are), and that's one area that's clearly reducing the guy's sensation.
And half the time, the camera cuts away in between, and I think the cumshot probably wasn't even related to the sex.The creampie porn that's been gaining popularity lately is an improvement in that you can see that it was actually the sex that led to the orgasm, but still seems contrived when they freeze to almost pull out and cum just inside the entrance.
I think appeal is supposed to be less about improved realism than just making it raunchier, but it seems like the frothy mess you get from normal unprotected sex would do that better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759140</id>
	<title>Dare I Say</title>
	<author>The Wild Norseman</author>
	<datestamp>1263390240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That Avatar is soon to be facing some stiff competition?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That Avatar is soon to be facing some stiff competition ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That Avatar is soon to be facing some stiff competition?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758726</id>
	<title>Corner the market</title>
	<author>Fishbulb</author>
	<datestamp>1263388260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Time to buy stock in any company that sells lens cleaning kits.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Time to buy stock in any company that sells lens cleaning kits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Time to buy stock in any company that sells lens cleaning kits.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757246</id>
	<title>Penetration</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263381900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heh, he said penetration.  Heh, heh heh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heh , he said penetration .
Heh , heh heh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heh, he said penetration.
Heh, heh heh!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830</id>
	<title>Seriously?</title>
	<author>Evets</author>
	<datestamp>1263379980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who in their right mind would actually buy a 3D tv that required you to wear glasses while viewing.  That's absurd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who in their right mind would actually buy a 3D tv that required you to wear glasses while viewing .
That 's absurd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who in their right mind would actually buy a 3D tv that required you to wear glasses while viewing.
That's absurd.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757980</id>
	<title>Re:30,000-40,000???!!!</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1263385380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Male porns stars generally make about $200 per film. Females make $1500 and up. So, do those sub-$1000 movies just have an acting staff of five guys?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Male porns stars generally make about $ 200 per film .
Females make $ 1500 and up .
So , do those sub- $ 1000 movies just have an acting staff of five guys ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Male porns stars generally make about $200 per film.
Females make $1500 and up.
So, do those sub-$1000 movies just have an acting staff of five guys?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758024</id>
	<title>Re:why would it cost 30\% more to make porn in 3D?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263385560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First, they have to pay for the high end equipment costs that burn the 3D movies to discs (costs passed on to them from the company burning the discs).  Second, the editing equipment has to be beefed up and the software is all new to handle the parallel streams of video and the storage requirements and processing overhead of rendering the video.  Third, they've gotta buy a whole lot more lube!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First , they have to pay for the high end equipment costs that burn the 3D movies to discs ( costs passed on to them from the company burning the discs ) .
Second , the editing equipment has to be beefed up and the software is all new to handle the parallel streams of video and the storage requirements and processing overhead of rendering the video .
Third , they 've got ta buy a whole lot more lube ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, they have to pay for the high end equipment costs that burn the 3D movies to discs (costs passed on to them from the company burning the discs).
Second, the editing equipment has to be beefed up and the software is all new to handle the parallel streams of video and the storage requirements and processing overhead of rendering the video.
Third, they've gotta buy a whole lot more lube!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758154</id>
	<title>Shattering glasses</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1263385980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>That's certainly what people fear most: getting caught wearing glasses while watching porn.</i></p><p>The way some people watch porn I'd think they'd be worried about the glasses shattering. Or perhaps that's a result of the kind of porn they choose. Either or.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's certainly what people fear most : getting caught wearing glasses while watching porn.The way some people watch porn I 'd think they 'd be worried about the glasses shattering .
Or perhaps that 's a result of the kind of porn they choose .
Either or .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's certainly what people fear most: getting caught wearing glasses while watching porn.The way some people watch porn I'd think they'd be worried about the glasses shattering.
Or perhaps that's a result of the kind of porn they choose.
Either or.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756762</id>
	<title>Re:Oh God</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263379620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Think of the "money" shot...shudder.</p></div><p>It's coming right at me!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of the " money " shot...shudder.It 's coming right at me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of the "money" shot...shudder.It's coming right at me!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757718</id>
	<title>Jack-off Glasses.</title>
	<author>lawpoop</author>
	<datestamp>1263384060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So if you get 'caught', not only do you have to zip up, switch to some innocuous application, but now you also have to rip off and hide 3D glasses? <br> <br>What are the chances that these glasses <b>aren't</b> going to be called "Jack-off Glasses"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So if you get 'caught ' , not only do you have to zip up , switch to some innocuous application , but now you also have to rip off and hide 3D glasses ?
What are the chances that these glasses are n't going to be called " Jack-off Glasses " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if you get 'caught', not only do you have to zip up, switch to some innocuous application, but now you also have to rip off and hide 3D glasses?
What are the chances that these glasses aren't going to be called "Jack-off Glasses"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757094</id>
	<title>Who cares about eyeglasses!?</title>
	<author>KharmaWidow</author>
	<datestamp>1263381120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forget about the cost of popcorn and soda... The biggest ripoff in the theater today are the 3D glasses.  You have to buy them EVERY time. Even when you watch the same film twice!  Getting a pair of 3D glasses is no problem... As for being seen wearing them, is that really an issue? People get off smelling and licking dirty feet! A pair of 3D glasses will probably just add to the turn on and sex-with-3D-glasses-on will become another fetish.</p><p>I want 3D boobies!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget about the cost of popcorn and soda... The biggest ripoff in the theater today are the 3D glasses .
You have to buy them EVERY time .
Even when you watch the same film twice !
Getting a pair of 3D glasses is no problem... As for being seen wearing them , is that really an issue ?
People get off smelling and licking dirty feet !
A pair of 3D glasses will probably just add to the turn on and sex-with-3D-glasses-on will become another fetish.I want 3D boobies !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget about the cost of popcorn and soda... The biggest ripoff in the theater today are the 3D glasses.
You have to buy them EVERY time.
Even when you watch the same film twice!
Getting a pair of 3D glasses is no problem... As for being seen wearing them, is that really an issue?
People get off smelling and licking dirty feet!
A pair of 3D glasses will probably just add to the turn on and sex-with-3D-glasses-on will become another fetish.I want 3D boobies!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757106</id>
	<title>Re:Oh God</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263381180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; I had a projection TV in my house (and kickass sound system to match).  The screen was 10 feet wide, and 6 feet tall (more or less).  I simply couldn't bring myself to watch porn on it though.  Huge breasts would be entertaining, but it may make me feel insecure about my 8 inches, when I see a 6 foot penis on the screen.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; I was on the phone with it on HBO one day, and was totally distracted when the Dukes of Hazard movie was on, and they panned up Jessica Simpson's legs.  I was simply speechless.  The person I was talking to asked if I was ok, and it took me a minute or so to form coherent sentences.  Once I described what I just saw, they were very understanding.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Ya, if there was a money shot towards the camera in 3D, I'd probably puke on the spot.  It may not be too bad on a regular TV, but think of what would appear to be gallons of it flying at you.  eeeeewwwwwww.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>  I had a projection TV in my house ( and kickass sound system to match ) .
The screen was 10 feet wide , and 6 feet tall ( more or less ) .
I simply could n't bring myself to watch porn on it though .
Huge breasts would be entertaining , but it may make me feel insecure about my 8 inches , when I see a 6 foot penis on the screen .
    I was on the phone with it on HBO one day , and was totally distracted when the Dukes of Hazard movie was on , and they panned up Jessica Simpson 's legs .
I was simply speechless .
The person I was talking to asked if I was ok , and it took me a minute or so to form coherent sentences .
Once I described what I just saw , they were very understanding .
: )     Ya , if there was a money shot towards the camera in 3D , I 'd probably puke on the spot .
It may not be too bad on a regular TV , but think of what would appear to be gallons of it flying at you .
eeeeewwwwwww .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
  I had a projection TV in my house (and kickass sound system to match).
The screen was 10 feet wide, and 6 feet tall (more or less).
I simply couldn't bring myself to watch porn on it though.
Huge breasts would be entertaining, but it may make me feel insecure about my 8 inches, when I see a 6 foot penis on the screen.
    I was on the phone with it on HBO one day, and was totally distracted when the Dukes of Hazard movie was on, and they panned up Jessica Simpson's legs.
I was simply speechless.
The person I was talking to asked if I was ok, and it took me a minute or so to form coherent sentences.
Once I described what I just saw, they were very understanding.
:)
    Ya, if there was a money shot towards the camera in 3D, I'd probably puke on the spot.
It may not be too bad on a regular TV, but think of what would appear to be gallons of it flying at you.
eeeeewwwwwww.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756950</id>
	<title>Re:can't these guys do two screens, dump the glass</title>
	<author>gnutrino</author>
	<datestamp>1263380520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That wouldn't give proper 3d though - just a separation of foreground and background....</htmltext>
<tokenext>That would n't give proper 3d though - just a separation of foreground and background... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That wouldn't give proper 3d though - just a separation of foreground and background....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756908</id>
	<title>Penetration height?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263380340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Rob Smith, director of operations at Hustler Video Group says he hopes that market <b>penetration</b> of 3D TVs in the home is <b>high enough</b> that 'by the fourth quarter of this year it will be at the point where we can justify doing a 3D product.</p></div><p>WTF kind of retard is Rob Smith?! Even your average Slashdot user knows that penetration is measured in terms of depth, not height. The irony of it is that Rob Smith has probably had more pussy than the entire Slashdot userbase put together. *sigh*</p><p>Fuck, let's slashdot <a href="http://www.hustler.com/" title="hustler.com" rel="nofollow">Hustler</a> [hustler.com]!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rob Smith , director of operations at Hustler Video Group says he hopes that market penetration of 3D TVs in the home is high enough that 'by the fourth quarter of this year it will be at the point where we can justify doing a 3D product.WTF kind of retard is Rob Smith ? !
Even your average Slashdot user knows that penetration is measured in terms of depth , not height .
The irony of it is that Rob Smith has probably had more pussy than the entire Slashdot userbase put together .
* sigh * Fuck , let 's slashdot Hustler [ hustler.com ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rob Smith, director of operations at Hustler Video Group says he hopes that market penetration of 3D TVs in the home is high enough that 'by the fourth quarter of this year it will be at the point where we can justify doing a 3D product.WTF kind of retard is Rob Smith?!
Even your average Slashdot user knows that penetration is measured in terms of depth, not height.
The irony of it is that Rob Smith has probably had more pussy than the entire Slashdot userbase put together.
*sigh*Fuck, let's slashdot Hustler [hustler.com]!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710</id>
	<title>Penetration</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263379380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hehe, he said "penetration"!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hehe , he said " penetration " !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hehe, he said "penetration"!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759182</id>
	<title>Re:This is not a new thing</title>
	<author>TheSync</author>
	<datestamp>1263390480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wikipedia says <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Stewardesses" title="wikipedia.org">The Stewardesses</a> [wikipedia.org] was produced on a budget of just over $100,000, and the film grossed over $27,000,000 (USD) in 1970 dollars.  Yes, I'd say that was a "big hit" for a small-time porno.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wikipedia says The Stewardesses [ wikipedia.org ] was produced on a budget of just over $ 100,000 , and the film grossed over $ 27,000,000 ( USD ) in 1970 dollars .
Yes , I 'd say that was a " big hit " for a small-time porno .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wikipedia says The Stewardesses [wikipedia.org] was produced on a budget of just over $100,000, and the film grossed over $27,000,000 (USD) in 1970 dollars.
Yes, I'd say that was a "big hit" for a small-time porno.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757274</id>
	<title>Re:When did they ask?</title>
	<author>Dan667</author>
	<datestamp>1263382080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Avatar gave me a headache, the 3D felt gimicky, and was distracting.  I would never watch another 3D film after that experience.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Avatar gave me a headache , the 3D felt gimicky , and was distracting .
I would never watch another 3D film after that experience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Avatar gave me a headache, the 3D felt gimicky, and was distracting.
I would never watch another 3D film after that experience.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757794</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263384480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By your nickname, you can also add "pants" to that list.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By your nickname , you can also add " pants " to that list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By your nickname, you can also add "pants" to that list.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30761516</id>
	<title>It's a quality thing....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263412320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...without 3d glasses the screen itself has to be made so you can view from different angles.<br>That would mean that 'normal' 2D viewing would give less resolution, and that is something you would not be prepared to buy.<br>Besides, the experience *with* glasses is better than without them. And on top of that, there is also a difference between the various glasses itself: the shutter glasses (electric) tend to be more versatile and do not require specific screens, but it is not as good as the polarized glasses (the avatar kind), which require a special screen.<br>
Even with all that in place, 3D TV is heavily dependent on display panel speed - slow displays are not nearly fast enough to give you a good experience (but will give a nice headache).</htmltext>
<tokenext>...without 3d glasses the screen itself has to be made so you can view from different angles.That would mean that 'normal ' 2D viewing would give less resolution , and that is something you would not be prepared to buy.Besides , the experience * with * glasses is better than without them .
And on top of that , there is also a difference between the various glasses itself : the shutter glasses ( electric ) tend to be more versatile and do not require specific screens , but it is not as good as the polarized glasses ( the avatar kind ) , which require a special screen .
Even with all that in place , 3D TV is heavily dependent on display panel speed - slow displays are not nearly fast enough to give you a good experience ( but will give a nice headache ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...without 3d glasses the screen itself has to be made so you can view from different angles.That would mean that 'normal' 2D viewing would give less resolution, and that is something you would not be prepared to buy.Besides, the experience *with* glasses is better than without them.
And on top of that, there is also a difference between the various glasses itself: the shutter glasses (electric) tend to be more versatile and do not require specific screens, but it is not as good as the polarized glasses (the avatar kind), which require a special screen.
Even with all that in place, 3D TV is heavily dependent on display panel speed - slow displays are not nearly fast enough to give you a good experience (but will give a nice headache).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758468</id>
	<title>Re:why would it cost 30\% more to make porn in 3D?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263387180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, in many workflows / applications, you *do* need to cut the picture seperately for both eyes, as they are commonly individual streams of video. Only recently have workflow utilities, like Cineform's Neo3D, enabled a simpler production methodology.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , in many workflows / applications , you * do * need to cut the picture seperately for both eyes , as they are commonly individual streams of video .
Only recently have workflow utilities , like Cineform 's Neo3D , enabled a simpler production methodology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, in many workflows / applications, you *do* need to cut the picture seperately for both eyes, as they are commonly individual streams of video.
Only recently have workflow utilities, like Cineform's Neo3D, enabled a simpler production methodology.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760524</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking of money shots...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263400800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <em>Does anyone find this a turn-on? To me, it's gross and degrading.</em> </p><p>How about we stay away from judging other people's sexual preferences? Telling a woman who genuinely enjoys such things that she's being "degraded" should rightfully get you a slap to the face, perhaps worse. This sort of condescending, "You think you like that but you really don't, because you're simple-minded" pontification is insulting. If you're trying to be pro-women perhaps you should consider that woman are not die-cast replicas, all identical to each other, who need a smart man like you to save them from their own ignorance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone find this a turn-on ?
To me , it 's gross and degrading .
How about we stay away from judging other people 's sexual preferences ?
Telling a woman who genuinely enjoys such things that she 's being " degraded " should rightfully get you a slap to the face , perhaps worse .
This sort of condescending , " You think you like that but you really do n't , because you 're simple-minded " pontification is insulting .
If you 're trying to be pro-women perhaps you should consider that woman are not die-cast replicas , all identical to each other , who need a smart man like you to save them from their own ignorance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Does anyone find this a turn-on?
To me, it's gross and degrading.
How about we stay away from judging other people's sexual preferences?
Telling a woman who genuinely enjoys such things that she's being "degraded" should rightfully get you a slap to the face, perhaps worse.
This sort of condescending, "You think you like that but you really don't, because you're simple-minded" pontification is insulting.
If you're trying to be pro-women perhaps you should consider that woman are not die-cast replicas, all identical to each other, who need a smart man like you to save them from their own ignorance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758062</id>
	<title>Thanks, Slashdot</title>
	<author>halcyon1234</author>
	<datestamp>1263385680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>In a thread about porn, over half the posts are quibbles about Avatar.
<p>
Good job, Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a thread about porn , over half the posts are quibbles about Avatar .
Good job , Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a thread about porn, over half the posts are quibbles about Avatar.
Good job, Slashdot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756892</id>
	<title>can't these guys do two screens, dump the glasses?</title>
	<author>swschrad</author>
	<datestamp>1263380280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>porn stars don't like guys wearing silly 3D glasses.  project onto one back screen and one semitransparent front screen, and put the 3D in the theater, not the cranium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>porn stars do n't like guys wearing silly 3D glasses .
project onto one back screen and one semitransparent front screen , and put the 3D in the theater , not the cranium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>porn stars don't like guys wearing silly 3D glasses.
project onto one back screen and one semitransparent front screen, and put the 3D in the theater, not the cranium.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756822</id>
	<title>He underestimates me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263379920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>people don't want to be encumbered by eyewear when viewing a film</p></div><p>I watched a whole porno <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereoscopy#Freeviewing" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow"> <em>crosseyed</em> </a> [wikipedia.org], you insensitive clod! Glasses are a small price to pay for a larger picture and less eyestrain...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>people do n't want to be encumbered by eyewear when viewing a filmI watched a whole porno crosseyed [ wikipedia.org ] , you insensitive clod !
Glasses are a small price to pay for a larger picture and less eyestrain.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>people don't want to be encumbered by eyewear when viewing a filmI watched a whole porno  crosseyed  [wikipedia.org], you insensitive clod!
Glasses are a small price to pay for a larger picture and less eyestrain...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757900</id>
	<title>Tiptoe?</title>
	<author>gurudyne</author>
	<datestamp>1263385020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would think 'pussyfoot' is more appropriate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would think 'pussyfoot ' is more appropriate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would think 'pussyfoot' is more appropriate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759334</id>
	<title>Re:Penetration,NIKE JORDAN SHOES,COACH,HANDBAGS...</title>
	<author>Lawrence1986</author>
	<datestamp>1263391200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.allbyer.com/" title="allbyer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.allbyer.com/</a> [allbyer.com]
Hi,Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,Here are the most popular, most stylish and avant-garde shoes,handbags,Tshirts, jacket,Tracksuit w ect...NIKE SHOX,JORDAN SHOES 1-24,AF,DUNK,SB,PUMA<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,R4,NZ,OZ,T1-TL3) $35HANDBGAS(COACH,L V, DG, ED HARDY) $35TSHIRTS (POLO<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ED HARDY, LACOSTE) $16
thanks... For details, please consult <a href="http://www.allbyer.com/" title="allbyer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.allbyer.com/</a> [allbyer.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.allbyer.com/ [ allbyer.com ] Hi,Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,Here are the most popular , most stylish and avant-garde shoes,handbags,Tshirts , jacket,Tracksuit w ect...NIKE SHOX,JORDAN SHOES 1-24,AF,DUNK,SB,PUMA ,R4,NZ,OZ,T1-TL3 ) $ 35HANDBGAS ( COACH,L V , DG , ED HARDY ) $ 35TSHIRTS ( POLO ,ED HARDY , LACOSTE ) $ 16 thanks... For details , please consult http : //www.allbyer.com/ [ allbyer.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.allbyer.com/ [allbyer.com]
Hi,Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,Here are the most popular, most stylish and avant-garde shoes,handbags,Tshirts, jacket,Tracksuit w ect...NIKE SHOX,JORDAN SHOES 1-24,AF,DUNK,SB,PUMA ,R4,NZ,OZ,T1-TL3) $35HANDBGAS(COACH,L V, DG, ED HARDY) $35TSHIRTS (POLO ,ED HARDY, LACOSTE) $16
thanks... For details, please consult http://www.allbyer.com/ [allbyer.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757460</id>
	<title>People will come around on the 3D glasses...</title>
	<author>Count Scrofula</author>
	<datestamp>1263382860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pretty soon your average bukkake video will be so realistic, you'll need protective eye-wear anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty soon your average bukkake video will be so realistic , you 'll need protective eye-wear anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty soon your average bukkake video will be so realistic, you'll need protective eye-wear anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30763740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757530
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30761764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30761530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30761516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30763320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30762438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30762668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30762192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30765524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30762400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30766440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_2130205_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758726
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758020
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756794
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757638
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759298
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757160
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757592
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759140
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757274
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30763320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30761764
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757598
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30762668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756954
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757648
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759426
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757314
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756908
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758482
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757204
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30765524
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30763740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757900
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759490
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756982
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759188
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757782
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756822
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758798
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30761516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30762400
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756788
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758024
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757132
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759316
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757336
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757428
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757822
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30766440
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760524
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760434
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757866
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757466
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30762192
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30760804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30758216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757106
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30762438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30757948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_2130205.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30759728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30756920
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_2130205.30761530
</commentlist>
</conversation>
