<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_13_1510229</id>
	<title>Man Uses Drake Equation To Explain Girlfriend Woes</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1263383820000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>artemis67 writes <i>"A man studying in London has taken a mathematical equation that predicts the possibility of alien life in the universe to explain why he can't find a girlfriend. Peter Backus, a native of Seattle and PhD candidate and Teaching Fellow in the Department of Economics at the University of Warwick, near London, in his paper, '<a href="http://www.foxcharlotte.com/dpps/news/dpgo-Peter-Backus-uses-math-to-explain-girlfriend-woes-fc-20100112\_5537488">Why I don't have a girlfriend: An application of the Drake Equation to love in the UK</a>,' used math to estimate the number of potential girlfriends in the UK. In describing the paper on the university Web site he wrote 'the results are not encouraging. The probability of finding love in the UK is only about 100 times better than the probability of finding intelligent life in our galaxy.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>artemis67 writes " A man studying in London has taken a mathematical equation that predicts the possibility of alien life in the universe to explain why he ca n't find a girlfriend .
Peter Backus , a native of Seattle and PhD candidate and Teaching Fellow in the Department of Economics at the University of Warwick , near London , in his paper , 'Why I do n't have a girlfriend : An application of the Drake Equation to love in the UK, ' used math to estimate the number of potential girlfriends in the UK .
In describing the paper on the university Web site he wrote 'the results are not encouraging .
The probability of finding love in the UK is only about 100 times better than the probability of finding intelligent life in our galaxy .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>artemis67 writes "A man studying in London has taken a mathematical equation that predicts the possibility of alien life in the universe to explain why he can't find a girlfriend.
Peter Backus, a native of Seattle and PhD candidate and Teaching Fellow in the Department of Economics at the University of Warwick, near London, in his paper, 'Why I don't have a girlfriend: An application of the Drake Equation to love in the UK,' used math to estimate the number of potential girlfriends in the UK.
In describing the paper on the university Web site he wrote 'the results are not encouraging.
The probability of finding love in the UK is only about 100 times better than the probability of finding intelligent life in our galaxy.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763178</id>
	<title>brilliant plan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263479700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Women all over now know he is about to get his PhD. Gold diggers from all over should be knocking down his door.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Women all over now know he is about to get his PhD .
Gold diggers from all over should be knocking down his door .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Women all over now know he is about to get his PhD.
Gold diggers from all over should be knocking down his door.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761678</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia...</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1263501480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is a myth.</p><p>I am currently living in ex-GDR where there are lots of "eastern bloc" countires. I've traveled to Bulgaria, Croatia and CZ and have good friends from Serbia and Syria.</p><p>From this experiences, I have to agree with the other AC wo stated that chicks over there look for RICH and CONFIDENT guys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is a myth.I am currently living in ex-GDR where there are lots of " eastern bloc " countires .
I 've traveled to Bulgaria , Croatia and CZ and have good friends from Serbia and Syria.From this experiences , I have to agree with the other AC wo stated that chicks over there look for RICH and CONFIDENT guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is a myth.I am currently living in ex-GDR where there are lots of "eastern bloc" countires.
I've traveled to Bulgaria, Croatia and CZ and have good friends from Serbia and Syria.From this experiences, I have to agree with the other AC wo stated that chicks over there look for RICH and CONFIDENT guys.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759124</id>
	<title>Lonely People Lower Their Standards</title>
	<author>rebmemeR</author>
	<datestamp>1263390180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and I'll bet he lowered his. Asylum reports Backus has had a girlfriend for six months.
Or maybe his GF *is* an ET alien. Did you ever see Laliari in the movie Galaxy Quest? <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-vccWZPSyQ" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-vccWZPSyQ</a> [youtube.com] @1:50

Backus asserts he is "mostly a heterosexual male". Why the ambiguity? Is he pondering that he's a lesbian trapped in a man's body?
Woody Allen understood the Drake Equation: "The good thing about being bisexual is that it doubles your chance of a date on a Saturday night."</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and I 'll bet he lowered his .
Asylum reports Backus has had a girlfriend for six months .
Or maybe his GF * is * an ET alien .
Did you ever see Laliari in the movie Galaxy Quest ?
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = o-vccWZPSyQ [ youtube.com ] @ 1 : 50 Backus asserts he is " mostly a heterosexual male " .
Why the ambiguity ?
Is he pondering that he 's a lesbian trapped in a man 's body ?
Woody Allen understood the Drake Equation : " The good thing about being bisexual is that it doubles your chance of a date on a Saturday night .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and I'll bet he lowered his.
Asylum reports Backus has had a girlfriend for six months.
Or maybe his GF *is* an ET alien.
Did you ever see Laliari in the movie Galaxy Quest?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-vccWZPSyQ [youtube.com] @1:50

Backus asserts he is "mostly a heterosexual male".
Why the ambiguity?
Is he pondering that he's a lesbian trapped in a man's body?
Woody Allen understood the Drake Equation: "The good thing about being bisexual is that it doubles your chance of a date on a Saturday night.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759722</id>
	<title>Re:Where have I heard this before? Oh yeah...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263393720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and an episode of Big Bang Theory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and an episode of Big Bang Theory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and an episode of Big Bang Theory.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762390</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263470040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The reason it ended in failure is because niggers can steal rails faster than engineers can lay them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason it ended in failure is because niggers can steal rails faster than engineers can lay them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason it ended in failure is because niggers can steal rails faster than engineers can lay them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760206</id>
	<title>personally i use the quadratic equation</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1263398040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>36d^2 + 24x + 36 = 5'3"</p><p>this particular form was derived by an english academic knighted by the queen, a certain sir mix-a-lot</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>36d ^ 2 + 24x + 36 = 5'3 " this particular form was derived by an english academic knighted by the queen , a certain sir mix-a-lot</tokentext>
<sentencetext>36d^2 + 24x + 36 = 5'3"this particular form was derived by an english academic knighted by the queen, a certain sir mix-a-lot</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759046</id>
	<title>This seems very familiar</title>
	<author>RandomPrecision</author>
	<datestamp>1263389700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From <a href="http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Why\_I\_Will\_Never\_Have\_a\_Girlfriend" title="nothingisreal.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [nothingisreal.com].</p><p>I guess it's not exactly the same, as the previous one didn't use the Drake Equation...but close enough for me to raise an eyebrow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From here [ nothingisreal.com ] .I guess it 's not exactly the same , as the previous one did n't use the Drake Equation...but close enough for me to raise an eyebrow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From here [nothingisreal.com].I guess it's not exactly the same, as the previous one didn't use the Drake Equation...but close enough for me to raise an eyebrow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760502</id>
	<title>Slashdotter?</title>
	<author>cashman73</author>
	<datestamp>1263400620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's his Slashdot UID?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's his Slashdot UID ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's his Slashdot UID?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650</id>
	<title>What are the odds?</title>
	<author>newsdee</author>
	<datestamp>1263387960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He should try lottery or SETI@Home next. From TFA:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>But in the end Backus defied the odds. Asylum reported that Backus has a girlfriend of about six months. "She's from London," he told the Web site. "And she meets all my criteria."</p></div><p>Good for him, but not very good for his theory...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He should try lottery or SETI @ Home next .
From TFA : But in the end Backus defied the odds .
Asylum reported that Backus has a girlfriend of about six months .
" She 's from London , " he told the Web site .
" And she meets all my criteria .
" Good for him , but not very good for his theory.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He should try lottery or SETI@Home next.
From TFA:But in the end Backus defied the odds.
Asylum reported that Backus has a girlfriend of about six months.
"She's from London," he told the Web site.
"And she meets all my criteria.
"Good for him, but not very good for his theory...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758596</id>
	<title>So essentially</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263387660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>He's set personal standards that are virtually impossible to meet. That would be his problem, not the female population's.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's set personal standards that are virtually impossible to meet .
That would be his problem , not the female population 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's set personal standards that are virtually impossible to meet.
That would be his problem, not the female population's.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759654</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't gonna help.</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1263393180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>Love is not reasonable and can not be reasoned with.</i></p><p>So love is like the terminator.</p></div><p>Yeah, you get it, don't you? It finds you. That's what love does! That's <em>all</em> it does! You can't stop it! It'll find you and reach down your throat and rip your fucking heart out and stick it on a Hallmark greeting card with an insipid little tinny tune on a chip and hand it to you!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Love is not reasonable and can not be reasoned with.So love is like the terminator.Yeah , you get it , do n't you ?
It finds you .
That 's what love does !
That 's all it does !
You ca n't stop it !
It 'll find you and reach down your throat and rip your fucking heart out and stick it on a Hallmark greeting card with an insipid little tinny tune on a chip and hand it to you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Love is not reasonable and can not be reasoned with.So love is like the terminator.Yeah, you get it, don't you?
It finds you.
That's what love does!
That's all it does!
You can't stop it!
It'll find you and reach down your throat and rip your fucking heart out and stick it on a Hallmark greeting card with an insipid little tinny tune on a chip and hand it to you!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758902</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526</id>
	<title>Stunt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263387420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Common, this is just a stunt in order to get his picture all over the net in order to find a girlfriend !</p><p>He must count on the fact that girls will try to prove him wrong or that girls will be pleased to be the one in a million girl.</p><p>Brilliant tactic although...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-))</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Common , this is just a stunt in order to get his picture all over the net in order to find a girlfriend ! He must count on the fact that girls will try to prove him wrong or that girls will be pleased to be the one in a million girl.Brilliant tactic although... ; - ) )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Common, this is just a stunt in order to get his picture all over the net in order to find a girlfriend !He must count on the fact that girls will try to prove him wrong or that girls will be pleased to be the one in a million girl.Brilliant tactic although... ;-))</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758874</id>
	<title>Well, there's your problem right there!</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1263388920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps he would do a lot better if he stopped refusing to date non-aliens?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps he would do a lot better if he stopped refusing to date non-aliens ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps he would do a lot better if he stopped refusing to date non-aliens?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758750</id>
	<title>It's obvious to everyone (except him)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263388380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is intuitively obvious that anyone who's inclined to "use the Drake Equation to explain girlfriend woes" is significantly less likely to have a girlfriend in the first place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is intuitively obvious that anyone who 's inclined to " use the Drake Equation to explain girlfriend woes " is significantly less likely to have a girlfriend in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is intuitively obvious that anyone who's inclined to "use the Drake Equation to explain girlfriend woes" is significantly less likely to have a girlfriend in the first place.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760046</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't gonna help.</title>
	<author>mb1</author>
	<datestamp>1263396480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>oh maaan, even by writing that you've lowered his chances... and everyone else's.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>oh maaan , even by writing that you 've lowered his chances... and everyone else 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh maaan, even by writing that you've lowered his chances... and everyone else's.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763966</id>
	<title>same mathematical mistake as the financial crisis</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1263484080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The mistake is presume that the factors are independent of one another. When you assume independence you can take the logical intersection of the probabilities which is multiplying less-than-unity probabilities together. You can obtain a rather small result choosing enough factors. But if the factors are correlated, the correct mathematics is the largest probability number. Both the astronomical conditions and girlfriend factors are correlated to some degree makeing the results less than valid.
<br> <br>
This is the identical mistake made valuating debt securities. The mathematical underpinning was that you can offload most of the risk into a "junk tranch" by assuming failures like foreclosures are statistically independent. By "drake equation magic", i.e. multiplying probabilities to obtain the group probability, the group risk appears rather small. Independence is a decent assumption during good economic times because economic failures are more individual luck or actions.  But during a recession, economic failures are correlated, making the group statistical model invalid. The so-called good-risk securities turned into garbage and the junk securities became gold.
<br> <br>
I fear since a economics grad student does not understand probability like so many of his peers, this does not bode well for the future economy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The mistake is presume that the factors are independent of one another .
When you assume independence you can take the logical intersection of the probabilities which is multiplying less-than-unity probabilities together .
You can obtain a rather small result choosing enough factors .
But if the factors are correlated , the correct mathematics is the largest probability number .
Both the astronomical conditions and girlfriend factors are correlated to some degree makeing the results less than valid .
This is the identical mistake made valuating debt securities .
The mathematical underpinning was that you can offload most of the risk into a " junk tranch " by assuming failures like foreclosures are statistically independent .
By " drake equation magic " , i.e .
multiplying probabilities to obtain the group probability , the group risk appears rather small .
Independence is a decent assumption during good economic times because economic failures are more individual luck or actions .
But during a recession , economic failures are correlated , making the group statistical model invalid .
The so-called good-risk securities turned into garbage and the junk securities became gold .
I fear since a economics grad student does not understand probability like so many of his peers , this does not bode well for the future economy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The mistake is presume that the factors are independent of one another.
When you assume independence you can take the logical intersection of the probabilities which is multiplying less-than-unity probabilities together.
You can obtain a rather small result choosing enough factors.
But if the factors are correlated, the correct mathematics is the largest probability number.
Both the astronomical conditions and girlfriend factors are correlated to some degree makeing the results less than valid.
This is the identical mistake made valuating debt securities.
The mathematical underpinning was that you can offload most of the risk into a "junk tranch" by assuming failures like foreclosures are statistically independent.
By "drake equation magic", i.e.
multiplying probabilities to obtain the group probability, the group risk appears rather small.
Independence is a decent assumption during good economic times because economic failures are more individual luck or actions.
But during a recession, economic failures are correlated, making the group statistical model invalid.
The so-called good-risk securities turned into garbage and the junk securities became gold.
I fear since a economics grad student does not understand probability like so many of his peers, this does not bode well for the future economy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762306</id>
	<title>Re:What are the odds?</title>
	<author>cpghost</author>
	<datestamp>1263468660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>He should try lottery or SETI@Home next</p></div></blockquote><p>

That would be SFGF@home (search for girlfriend while sitting @home).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He should try lottery or SETI @ Home next That would be SFGF @ home ( search for girlfriend while sitting @ home ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He should try lottery or SETI@Home next

That would be SFGF@home (search for girlfriend while sitting @home).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759424</id>
	<title>He's Wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263391620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>He's going to end up with a BIG FAT OVERBEARING girlfriend and eventually 10 kids.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's going to end up with a BIG FAT OVERBEARING girlfriend and eventually 10 kids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's going to end up with a BIG FAT OVERBEARING girlfriend and eventually 10 kids.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762958</id>
	<title>experiments showing flaw in theory?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263477600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My thought is that this might show a weakness in the Drake equation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My thought is that this might show a weakness in the Drake equation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My thought is that this might show a weakness in the Drake equation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904</id>
	<title>This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>Goodgerster</author>
	<datestamp>1263389100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>He is studying at the University of Warwick, which is near Coventry. It is far away from London. He is "studying in London" in the same sense that all Californians are residents of San Francisco. Has FOX News' target audience never heard of any English city besides London?</htmltext>
<tokenext>He is studying at the University of Warwick , which is near Coventry .
It is far away from London .
He is " studying in London " in the same sense that all Californians are residents of San Francisco .
Has FOX News ' target audience never heard of any English city besides London ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He is studying at the University of Warwick, which is near Coventry.
It is far away from London.
He is "studying in London" in the same sense that all Californians are residents of San Francisco.
Has FOX News' target audience never heard of any English city besides London?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762632</id>
	<title>Attracting a woman != maintaining relationship</title>
	<author>wdef</author>
	<datestamp>1263473340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Afterthought concerning my other replies here (if you can be bothered finding them):<p>

[anecdote]An old friend of mine was regarded by females as the best looking male in the universe - think young John Travolta.  He lost his virginity at 13yo to a 19yo model. He was (is) also a very charming and charismatic guy.  He left school early and worked in a very sexy industry and was literally buried in beautiful girls.  He f*ck*d and dumped all of them, sometimes having sex with 2 or more per day (this was pre-AIDS too). I was so jealous you would not believe it. </p><p>
He did live with some women for extended times in relationships and  eventually settled down quite a lot.  He was hurt once while very young as I recall. But he did not marry until quite late, to a younger woman with her own career. They split up because "she" did not want to settle down and placed her career first.</p><p>
So, despite his 10+ attractiveness rating, we both have ended up alone, though he has had a lot more sex along the way.[/anecodote]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Afterthought concerning my other replies here ( if you can be bothered finding them ) : [ anecdote ] An old friend of mine was regarded by females as the best looking male in the universe - think young John Travolta .
He lost his virginity at 13yo to a 19yo model .
He was ( is ) also a very charming and charismatic guy .
He left school early and worked in a very sexy industry and was literally buried in beautiful girls .
He f * ck * d and dumped all of them , sometimes having sex with 2 or more per day ( this was pre-AIDS too ) .
I was so jealous you would not believe it .
He did live with some women for extended times in relationships and eventually settled down quite a lot .
He was hurt once while very young as I recall .
But he did not marry until quite late , to a younger woman with her own career .
They split up because " she " did not want to settle down and placed her career first .
So , despite his 10 + attractiveness rating , we both have ended up alone , though he has had a lot more sex along the way .
[ /anecodote ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Afterthought concerning my other replies here (if you can be bothered finding them):

[anecdote]An old friend of mine was regarded by females as the best looking male in the universe - think young John Travolta.
He lost his virginity at 13yo to a 19yo model.
He was (is) also a very charming and charismatic guy.
He left school early and worked in a very sexy industry and was literally buried in beautiful girls.
He f*ck*d and dumped all of them, sometimes having sex with 2 or more per day (this was pre-AIDS too).
I was so jealous you would not believe it.
He did live with some women for extended times in relationships and  eventually settled down quite a lot.
He was hurt once while very young as I recall.
But he did not marry until quite late, to a younger woman with her own career.
They split up because "she" did not want to settle down and placed her career first.
So, despite his 10+ attractiveness rating, we both have ended up alone, though he has had a lot more sex along the way.
[/anecodote]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761600</id>
	<title>Re:newsflash....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263500040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So explain the fact that he HAS a girlfriend, genius.</p><p>Oh, right, you can't.  Because you're too stupid to read the article, and also too stupid to realize that the paper was an obvious joke and not a serious attempt at analyzing his own romantic problems.</p><p>I'd tell you to go play in traffic, but with the meager amount of brainpower at your command you'll no doubt do it on your own soon enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So explain the fact that he HAS a girlfriend , genius.Oh , right , you ca n't .
Because you 're too stupid to read the article , and also too stupid to realize that the paper was an obvious joke and not a serious attempt at analyzing his own romantic problems.I 'd tell you to go play in traffic , but with the meager amount of brainpower at your command you 'll no doubt do it on your own soon enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So explain the fact that he HAS a girlfriend, genius.Oh, right, you can't.
Because you're too stupid to read the article, and also too stupid to realize that the paper was an obvious joke and not a serious attempt at analyzing his own romantic problems.I'd tell you to go play in traffic, but with the meager amount of brainpower at your command you'll no doubt do it on your own soon enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758970</id>
	<title>Re:Stunt</title>
	<author>lcarnevale</author>
	<datestamp>1263389340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Quite brilliant indeed, but I think approaching a girl and just talk to her will be less time consuming and with A LOT more of success rate than this, shall I call it "experiment"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Quite brilliant indeed , but I think approaching a girl and just talk to her will be less time consuming and with A LOT more of success rate than this , shall I call it " experiment " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quite brilliant indeed, but I think approaching a girl and just talk to her will be less time consuming and with A LOT more of success rate than this, shall I call it "experiment"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759244</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263390780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hmn.</p><p>on the one hand, his heart must be *truly* klingon, and on the other, his heart must not be *truly* klingon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hmn.on the one hand , his heart must be * truly * klingon , and on the other , his heart must not be * truly * klingon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hmn.on the one hand, his heart must be *truly* klingon, and on the other, his heart must not be *truly* klingon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759368</id>
	<title>Problem in applying Drake equation</title>
	<author>HydroPhonic</author>
	<datestamp>1263391380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem is exactly in the question. . The chance of *finding* love is infinitesimal. The possibility of *making* it OTOH....</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is exactly in the question .
. The chance of * finding * love is infinitesimal .
The possibility of * making * it OTOH... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is exactly in the question.
. The chance of *finding* love is infinitesimal.
The possibility of *making* it OTOH....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760622</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>BillX</author>
	<datestamp>1263401940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>One of the reasons he can't find a girlfriend is because he is one of those people who USE the Drake equation</i></p><p>obXKCD: <a href="http://www.xkcd.com/191/" title="xkcd.com">191</a> [xkcd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the reasons he ca n't find a girlfriend is because he is one of those people who USE the Drake equationobXKCD : 191 [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the reasons he can't find a girlfriend is because he is one of those people who USE the Drake equationobXKCD: 191 [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758702</id>
	<title>Um...</title>
	<author>thestudio\_bob</author>
	<datestamp>1263388140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's the mathematical odds that he might be gay?

(Not that there's anything wrong with that)</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the mathematical odds that he might be gay ?
( Not that there 's anything wrong with that )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the mathematical odds that he might be gay?
(Not that there's anything wrong with that)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760144</id>
	<title>Percent</title>
	<author>DaSwing</author>
	<datestamp>1263397440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looking at the <a href="http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/phd\_students/backus/why\_i\_dont\_have\_a\_girlfriend.pdf" title="warwick.ac.uk" rel="nofollow">paper</a> [warwick.ac.uk], it seems that he doesn't get the meaning of percent.<blockquote><div><p>0.0014\% of Londoners [..] greater than a 1 in 1000 chance</p></div></blockquote><p>
and</p><blockquote><div><p>there is a 0.0000034\% chance [..] That&rsquo;s a 1 in 285,000 chance.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking at the paper [ warwick.ac.uk ] , it seems that he does n't get the meaning of percent.0.0014 \ % of Londoners [ .. ] greater than a 1 in 1000 chance andthere is a 0.0000034 \ % chance [ .. ] That    s a 1 in 285,000 chance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking at the paper [warwick.ac.uk], it seems that he doesn't get the meaning of percent.0.0014\% of Londoners [..] greater than a 1 in 1000 chance
andthere is a 0.0000034\% chance [..] That’s a 1 in 285,000 chance.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760290</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263399060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTFA:</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>But in the end Backus defied the odds. Asylum reported that <b>Backus has a girlfriend of about six months</b>. "She's from London," he told the Web site. "And she meets all my criteria."</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>So it appears that he does know how to get some. Can you do claim the same thing?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFA : But in the end Backus defied the odds .
Asylum reported that Backus has a girlfriend of about six months .
" She 's from London , " he told the Web site .
" And she meets all my criteria .
" So it appears that he does know how to get some .
Can you do claim the same thing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTFA: But in the end Backus defied the odds.
Asylum reported that Backus has a girlfriend of about six months.
"She's from London," he told the Web site.
"And she meets all my criteria.
" So it appears that he does know how to get some.
Can you do claim the same thing?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760700</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263402540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stick 1000 women in a room and sort them by attractiveness. Set your thresholds for "would date" and "would sleep with" and "would sleep with if drunk", and you can get a rough idea for the proportions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stick 1000 women in a room and sort them by attractiveness .
Set your thresholds for " would date " and " would sleep with " and " would sleep with if drunk " , and you can get a rough idea for the proportions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stick 1000 women in a room and sort them by attractiveness.
Set your thresholds for "would date" and "would sleep with" and "would sleep with if drunk", and you can get a rough idea for the proportions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759760</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263394020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Has FOX News' target audience never heard of any English city besides London?</p></div><p>More to the point, has FOX News' target audience ever heard of maths?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has FOX News ' target audience never heard of any English city besides London ? More to the point , has FOX News ' target audience ever heard of maths ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has FOX News' target audience never heard of any English city besides London?More to the point, has FOX News' target audience ever heard of maths?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760384</id>
	<title>Interesting criteria.</title>
	<author>AbRASiON</author>
	<datestamp>1263399720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Women with a college degree" so I take it people without a college degree are somehow inferior? Un-educated buffoons, no doubt!<br>If I were a woman and had to make the choice of a man, I think my criteria would be to avoid people with such silly stipulations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Women with a college degree " so I take it people without a college degree are somehow inferior ?
Un-educated buffoons , no doubt ! If I were a woman and had to make the choice of a man , I think my criteria would be to avoid people with such silly stipulations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Women with a college degree" so I take it people without a college degree are somehow inferior?
Un-educated buffoons, no doubt!If I were a woman and had to make the choice of a man, I think my criteria would be to avoid people with such silly stipulations.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758712</id>
	<title>Equation out of balance.</title>
	<author>fahrbot-bot</author>
	<datestamp>1263388200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll wager his value for "penis" is too small and "dick" too large... Oh the irony.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll wager his value for " penis " is too small and " dick " too large... Oh the irony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll wager his value for "penis" is too small and "dick" too large... Oh the irony.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761106</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>spitzig</author>
	<datestamp>1263407340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Age is a problem for this idea. Age is another variable in the equation, but most people think that age affects attractiveness. You'd have to limit yourself to women of the correct age group. AND not exclude any of that group.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Age is a problem for this idea .
Age is another variable in the equation , but most people think that age affects attractiveness .
You 'd have to limit yourself to women of the correct age group .
AND not exclude any of that group .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Age is a problem for this idea.
Age is another variable in the equation, but most people think that age affects attractiveness.
You'd have to limit yourself to women of the correct age group.
AND not exclude any of that group.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760230</id>
	<title>3-breasted green women</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1263398340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>That makes his odds of finding a girlfriend only about 100 times better than finding an alien.</p></div></blockquote><p>Those two options may not be mutually exclusive.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That makes his odds of finding a girlfriend only about 100 times better than finding an alien.Those two options may not be mutually exclusive .
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext>That makes his odds of finding a girlfriend only about 100 times better than finding an alien.Those two options may not be mutually exclusive.
     
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760060</id>
	<title>Rriiighhht.....</title>
	<author>grepya</author>
	<datestamp>1263396600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... <b>that's</b> the reason he doesn't have a girlfriend.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... that 's the reason he does n't have a girlfriend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... that's the reason he doesn't have a girlfriend.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760550</id>
	<title>Re:Stunt</title>
	<author>Montezumaa</author>
	<datestamp>1263401040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, he would have the same problems as Hugh Hefner.  Wait, I fail to see the problem here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , he would have the same problems as Hugh Hefner .
Wait , I fail to see the problem here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, he would have the same problems as Hugh Hefner.
Wait, I fail to see the problem here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762800</id>
	<title>much better calculations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263475740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>pfft, his equations and assumptions are unfounded, he doesn't cite his sources and is far too depressing, which should further lower his chances.</p><p>A scientifically sound, really hilarious article is here:<br>http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Why\_I\_Will\_Never\_Have\_a\_Girlfriend</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>pfft , his equations and assumptions are unfounded , he does n't cite his sources and is far too depressing , which should further lower his chances.A scientifically sound , really hilarious article is here : http : //en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Why \ _I \ _Will \ _Never \ _Have \ _a \ _Girlfriend</tokentext>
<sentencetext>pfft, his equations and assumptions are unfounded, he doesn't cite his sources and is far too depressing, which should further lower his chances.A scientifically sound, really hilarious article is here:http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Why\_I\_Will\_Never\_Have\_a\_Girlfriend</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759692</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't gonna help.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263393480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually.  Love is reasonable, just not logical.  His criteria are wrong.  First - find the one that is attractive, then worry about education, etc.  It is safe to reason that love is all about getting laid.  If your thinning out the herd before you even get a piece, you'll never get a piece.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually .
Love is reasonable , just not logical .
His criteria are wrong .
First - find the one that is attractive , then worry about education , etc .
It is safe to reason that love is all about getting laid .
If your thinning out the herd before you even get a piece , you 'll never get a piece .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually.
Love is reasonable, just not logical.
His criteria are wrong.
First - find the one that is attractive, then worry about education, etc.
It is safe to reason that love is all about getting laid.
If your thinning out the herd before you even get a piece, you'll never get a piece.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30769438</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263501900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That is a myth.</p><p>I am currently living in ex-GDR where there are lots of "eastern bloc" countires. I've traveled to Bulgaria, Croatia and CZ and have good friends from Serbia and Syria.</p><p>From this experiences, I have to agree with the other AC wo stated that chicks over there look for RICH and CONFIDENT guys.</p></div><p>...like anywhere else....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is a myth.I am currently living in ex-GDR where there are lots of " eastern bloc " countires .
I 've traveled to Bulgaria , Croatia and CZ and have good friends from Serbia and Syria.From this experiences , I have to agree with the other AC wo stated that chicks over there look for RICH and CONFIDENT guys....like anywhere else... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is a myth.I am currently living in ex-GDR where there are lots of "eastern bloc" countires.
I've traveled to Bulgaria, Croatia and CZ and have good friends from Serbia and Syria.From this experiences, I have to agree with the other AC wo stated that chicks over there look for RICH and CONFIDENT guys....like anywhere else....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763856</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263483660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Better forget about it. Being gay usually turns out to be a huge pain in the ass in the end...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Better forget about it .
Being gay usually turns out to be a huge pain in the ass in the end.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better forget about it.
Being gay usually turns out to be a huge pain in the ass in the end...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759792</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263394380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cheer up old son your chances are better than you think:  look to what are the things you are doing wrong. The Drake Equation was conceptually wrong.  When Frank Drake in 1960 introduced the equation that now bears his name: as a predictive measure of the probability of life existing elsewhere in our Universe [Drake and Sobel,1992], he used the wrong NULL hypothesis. In the late 50's and early 60's there was a very restrictive view  placed upon the the possibility of development of living systems elsewhere in our Universe. The error was that "Life is a natural stage in the evolution of matter"  [see www.ScienceAnd.com]. In other words' the null hypothesis is that life in our Universe is ubiquitous, and we must attempt to reject the hypothesis by investigating what would STOP it developing.  This is not what Drake and Sobel did: there approach was what would CAUSE it to develop.</p><p>Happy hunting.</p><p>zulu@mric.coop</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cheer up old son your chances are better than you think : look to what are the things you are doing wrong .
The Drake Equation was conceptually wrong .
When Frank Drake in 1960 introduced the equation that now bears his name : as a predictive measure of the probability of life existing elsewhere in our Universe [ Drake and Sobel,1992 ] , he used the wrong NULL hypothesis .
In the late 50 's and early 60 's there was a very restrictive view placed upon the the possibility of development of living systems elsewhere in our Universe .
The error was that " Life is a natural stage in the evolution of matter " [ see www.ScienceAnd.com ] .
In other words ' the null hypothesis is that life in our Universe is ubiquitous , and we must attempt to reject the hypothesis by investigating what would STOP it developing .
This is not what Drake and Sobel did : there approach was what would CAUSE it to develop.Happy hunting.zulu @ mric.coop</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cheer up old son your chances are better than you think:  look to what are the things you are doing wrong.
The Drake Equation was conceptually wrong.
When Frank Drake in 1960 introduced the equation that now bears his name: as a predictive measure of the probability of life existing elsewhere in our Universe [Drake and Sobel,1992], he used the wrong NULL hypothesis.
In the late 50's and early 60's there was a very restrictive view  placed upon the the possibility of development of living systems elsewhere in our Universe.
The error was that "Life is a natural stage in the evolution of matter"  [see www.ScienceAnd.com].
In other words' the null hypothesis is that life in our Universe is ubiquitous, and we must attempt to reject the hypothesis by investigating what would STOP it developing.
This is not what Drake and Sobel did: there approach was what would CAUSE it to develop.Happy hunting.zulu@mric.coop</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760116</id>
	<title>It could have been worse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263397020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The math would have been even more depressing if he were gay!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The math would have been even more depressing if he were gay !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The math would have been even more depressing if he were gay!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760944</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>wakim1618</author>
	<datestamp>1263405180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Coventry is only 86 miles from London. Living in London, I have come to realize that the English are a little touchy about the glorious little towns of their country and have that distorted European sense of distance. For instance, look at a map of Africa (or centered on Africa), Europe is a little patch of land to the north that looks a little larger than the Congo and Mauritania combined. Also this distorted sense of distance seems to explain why the French and English kept trying to build cross continent railways in Africa that ended in utter failure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Coventry is only 86 miles from London .
Living in London , I have come to realize that the English are a little touchy about the glorious little towns of their country and have that distorted European sense of distance .
For instance , look at a map of Africa ( or centered on Africa ) , Europe is a little patch of land to the north that looks a little larger than the Congo and Mauritania combined .
Also this distorted sense of distance seems to explain why the French and English kept trying to build cross continent railways in Africa that ended in utter failure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coventry is only 86 miles from London.
Living in London, I have come to realize that the English are a little touchy about the glorious little towns of their country and have that distorted European sense of distance.
For instance, look at a map of Africa (or centered on Africa), Europe is a little patch of land to the north that looks a little larger than the Congo and Mauritania combined.
Also this distorted sense of distance seems to explain why the French and English kept trying to build cross continent railways in Africa that ended in utter failure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758608</id>
	<title>Long story short</title>
	<author>ickleberry</author>
	<datestamp>1263387720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This guy is being too picky and unwilling to compromise</htmltext>
<tokenext>This guy is being too picky and unwilling to compromise</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This guy is being too picky and unwilling to compromise</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759120</id>
	<title>All I know is...</title>
	<author>Falconne</author>
	<datestamp>1263390120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All I know is, if a girl asks you how much you love her, using a pie chart is not the way to go.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All I know is , if a girl asks you how much you love her , using a pie chart is not the way to go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I know is, if a girl asks you how much you love her, using a pie chart is not the way to go.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762444</id>
	<title>"It's a girl Jim but not as we know it .."</title>
	<author>wdef</author>
	<datestamp>1263470940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My ex-girlfriend *was* an alien. Or looked like one anyway.

Now what are the chances of that Dr Drake?</htmltext>
<tokenext>My ex-girlfriend * was * an alien .
Or looked like one anyway .
Now what are the chances of that Dr Drake ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My ex-girlfriend *was* an alien.
Or looked like one anyway.
Now what are the chances of that Dr Drake?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763184</id>
	<title>Dude</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1263479700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you want to get a date, stop being a wuss.  Be funny. Be confident. Bathe.</p><p>It's not difficult to get women once you know what they want.</p><p>Start with David DeAngelo's Double Your Dating.  Stuff works.</p><p>Here's a freebie:  It's not them... it's you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want to get a date , stop being a wuss .
Be funny .
Be confident .
Bathe.It 's not difficult to get women once you know what they want.Start with David DeAngelo 's Double Your Dating .
Stuff works.Here 's a freebie : It 's not them... it 's you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want to get a date, stop being a wuss.
Be funny.
Be confident.
Bathe.It's not difficult to get women once you know what they want.Start with David DeAngelo's Double Your Dating.
Stuff works.Here's a freebie:  It's not them... it's you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762430</id>
	<title>about probabilities</title>
	<author>NightlordTW</author>
	<datestamp>1263470760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The probability of finding love in the UK is only about 100 times better than the probability of finding intelligent life in our galaxy.'"

100 times an approximately zero probability is not a very optimistic chance</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The probability of finding love in the UK is only about 100 times better than the probability of finding intelligent life in our galaxy .
' " 100 times an approximately zero probability is not a very optimistic chance</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The probability of finding love in the UK is only about 100 times better than the probability of finding intelligent life in our galaxy.
'"

100 times an approximately zero probability is not a very optimistic chance</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759896</id>
	<title>I did this a long time ago</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263395220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But I took it a step further. As a space scientist and aerospace engineer, I even put error bars on my calculation and used Taylor error analysis... my conclusions: In the Seattle area, there are between 0 and 25 girls that meet my basic criteria, with a best estimate of 10. I found one of them... and the other day did a "probability of meeting her" analysis and found there was a 20 in a million chance we would find eachother the way we did. Pretty cool stuff!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But I took it a step further .
As a space scientist and aerospace engineer , I even put error bars on my calculation and used Taylor error analysis... my conclusions : In the Seattle area , there are between 0 and 25 girls that meet my basic criteria , with a best estimate of 10 .
I found one of them... and the other day did a " probability of meeting her " analysis and found there was a 20 in a million chance we would find eachother the way we did .
Pretty cool stuff !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I took it a step further.
As a space scientist and aerospace engineer, I even put error bars on my calculation and used Taylor error analysis... my conclusions: In the Seattle area, there are between 0 and 25 girls that meet my basic criteria, with a best estimate of 10.
I found one of them... and the other day did a "probability of meeting her" analysis and found there was a 20 in a million chance we would find eachother the way we did.
Pretty cool stuff!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758582</id>
	<title>This isn't gonna help.</title>
	<author>bertoelcon</author>
	<datestamp>1263387600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Writing a paper relating love to reason and math may actually change the probability. Love is not reasonable and can not be reasoned with.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Writing a paper relating love to reason and math may actually change the probability .
Love is not reasonable and can not be reasoned with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Writing a paper relating love to reason and math may actually change the probability.
Love is not reasonable and can not be reasoned with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758708</id>
	<title>Such garbage...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263388200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://xkcd.com/384/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/384/</a> [xkcd.com]</p><p>Congratulations, you can google some numbers and stick them into a formula. You're brilliant, and it's oh so funny to come up with bullshit statistics like "only 100 times more likely than finding intelligent life in the universe".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //xkcd.com/384/ [ xkcd.com ] Congratulations , you can google some numbers and stick them into a formula .
You 're brilliant , and it 's oh so funny to come up with bullshit statistics like " only 100 times more likely than finding intelligent life in the universe " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://xkcd.com/384/ [xkcd.com]Congratulations, you can google some numbers and stick them into a formula.
You're brilliant, and it's oh so funny to come up with bullshit statistics like "only 100 times more likely than finding intelligent life in the universe".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759814</id>
	<title>Re:Stunt</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1263394560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"That's the thng about living in China-- even if you're a one-in-a-million kind of guy, there's a thousand other people out there just like you."<br>-- A. Whitney Brown</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" That 's the thng about living in China-- even if you 're a one-in-a-million kind of guy , there 's a thousand other people out there just like you .
" -- A. Whitney Brown</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"That's the thng about living in China-- even if you're a one-in-a-million kind of guy, there's a thousand other people out there just like you.
"-- A. Whitney Brown</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762238</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>peetm</author>
	<datestamp>1263467460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oxford - mainly because of Frasier, and the Boat Race - although I found that most Americans couldn't believe why the [obviously] Harvard team were called Cambridge!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oxford - mainly because of Frasier , and the Boat Race - although I found that most Americans could n't believe why the [ obviously ] Harvard team were called Cambridge !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oxford - mainly because of Frasier, and the Boat Race - although I found that most Americans couldn't believe why the [obviously] Harvard team were called Cambridge!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762148</id>
	<title>Drake equation is bullshit anyways.</title>
	<author>johncandale</author>
	<datestamp>1263465960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>  The outcome of the Drake equation is all based on what assumptions you make.
  <p>
    R* = the average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy</p><p>
This isn't a known number </p><p>
    fp = the fraction of those stars that have planets</p><p>
This isn't a known number, extrapolating from the known systems  isn't very reliable, for reference see biology </p><p>
    ne = the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets</p><p>
ok now you are just guessing.  Our system seems to have 3 or more potentials.  So what, you are going to apply that to every other solar system you project to find in the galaxy?</p><p>
    f = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop life at some point</p><p>
go ahead and predict your d&amp;d dice rolls while your at it.   While of course there exists a percent (total planets/ total life).  But hello, you don't know the total life, or planets for that matter.  So you are just conjecturing. </p><p>
    fi = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop intelligent life</p><p>
You base this number off of what again?  You don't exactly have a good sample size here considering the size of the numbers.</p><p>
    fc = the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space </p><p>
    L = the length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space</p><p>
Conjecture.
Besides even if the math was known and prefect, it's still just based on probabilities.   I.E, if you
took the  billions of galaxies, a high percent of them would have the prefect math outcome, but many many would not. </p><p>

On to the FA idle math play, while he knows many more of the numbers, he also makes several assumptions. "fB = The fraction of university educated, ageappropriate
women in London who I find physically attractive." </p><p>
While the first 3 numbers are easily known, the " \% who I find physically attractive" is just conjecture.  Even if you did a study with him with 100 random women, and he liked 15\% of them,
that  doesn't mean it would be 15\% of university educated, ageappropriate
women in London, maybe that subset is uglier or pretty then the larger group.</p><p>
Feel free to go ahead and nitpick about how I don't understand math, how else will I learn, but the basic idea's that it's based on assumptions and bad probability math remain.</p><p>
He's a economic student too. I have great respect for economics in academia, but not so much for actual economists.  Partly because they love to
talk about econ formulas similar to this that turn out to be wrong as often as they are right.  </p><p>

but what I really want to say is the Drake equation is bullshit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The outcome of the Drake equation is all based on what assumptions you make .
R * = the average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy This is n't a known number fp = the fraction of those stars that have planets This is n't a known number , extrapolating from the known systems is n't very reliable , for reference see biology ne = the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets ok now you are just guessing .
Our system seems to have 3 or more potentials .
So what , you are going to apply that to every other solar system you project to find in the galaxy ?
f = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop life at some point go ahead and predict your d&amp;d dice rolls while your at it .
While of course there exists a percent ( total planets/ total life ) .
But hello , you do n't know the total life , or planets for that matter .
So you are just conjecturing .
fi = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop intelligent life You base this number off of what again ?
You do n't exactly have a good sample size here considering the size of the numbers .
fc = the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space L = the length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space Conjecture .
Besides even if the math was known and prefect , it 's still just based on probabilities .
I.E , if you took the billions of galaxies , a high percent of them would have the prefect math outcome , but many many would not .
On to the FA idle math play , while he knows many more of the numbers , he also makes several assumptions .
" fB = The fraction of university educated , ageappropriate women in London who I find physically attractive .
" While the first 3 numbers are easily known , the " \ % who I find physically attractive " is just conjecture .
Even if you did a study with him with 100 random women , and he liked 15 \ % of them , that does n't mean it would be 15 \ % of university educated , ageappropriate women in London , maybe that subset is uglier or pretty then the larger group .
Feel free to go ahead and nitpick about how I do n't understand math , how else will I learn , but the basic idea 's that it 's based on assumptions and bad probability math remain .
He 's a economic student too .
I have great respect for economics in academia , but not so much for actual economists .
Partly because they love to talk about econ formulas similar to this that turn out to be wrong as often as they are right .
but what I really want to say is the Drake equation is bullshit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  The outcome of the Drake equation is all based on what assumptions you make.
R* = the average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy
This isn't a known number 
    fp = the fraction of those stars that have planets
This isn't a known number, extrapolating from the known systems  isn't very reliable, for reference see biology 
    ne = the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets
ok now you are just guessing.
Our system seems to have 3 or more potentials.
So what, you are going to apply that to every other solar system you project to find in the galaxy?
f = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop life at some point
go ahead and predict your d&amp;d dice rolls while your at it.
While of course there exists a percent (total planets/ total life).
But hello, you don't know the total life, or planets for that matter.
So you are just conjecturing.
fi = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop intelligent life
You base this number off of what again?
You don't exactly have a good sample size here considering the size of the numbers.
fc = the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space 
    L = the length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space
Conjecture.
Besides even if the math was known and prefect, it's still just based on probabilities.
I.E, if you
took the  billions of galaxies, a high percent of them would have the prefect math outcome, but many many would not.
On to the FA idle math play, while he knows many more of the numbers, he also makes several assumptions.
"fB = The fraction of university educated, ageappropriate
women in London who I find physically attractive.
" 
While the first 3 numbers are easily known, the " \% who I find physically attractive" is just conjecture.
Even if you did a study with him with 100 random women, and he liked 15\% of them,
that  doesn't mean it would be 15\% of university educated, ageappropriate
women in London, maybe that subset is uglier or pretty then the larger group.
Feel free to go ahead and nitpick about how I don't understand math, how else will I learn, but the basic idea's that it's based on assumptions and bad probability math remain.
He's a economic student too.
I have great respect for economics in academia, but not so much for actual economists.
Partly because they love to
talk about econ formulas similar to this that turn out to be wrong as often as they are right.
but what I really want to say is the Drake equation is bullshit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759982</id>
	<title>Re:Stunt</title>
	<author>WraithCube</author>
	<datestamp>1263396000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think you meant <a href="http://xkcd.com/314/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">this comic</a> [xkcd.com]. Though I doubt the fact that they both mention drawing graphs is pure chance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you meant this comic [ xkcd.com ] .
Though I doubt the fact that they both mention drawing graphs is pure chance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you meant this comic [xkcd.com].
Though I doubt the fact that they both mention drawing graphs is pure chance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759310</id>
	<title>He - or Drake equation - is wrong</title>
	<author>slimjim8094</author>
	<datestamp>1263391140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, if he correctly applied the Drake Equation, it seems the equation is wrong - the odds are clearly much higher than the equation predicts.</p><p>But more likely, the formula makes assumptions his case doesn't meet, or he did it wrong.</p><p>Non-story.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if he correctly applied the Drake Equation , it seems the equation is wrong - the odds are clearly much higher than the equation predicts.But more likely , the formula makes assumptions his case does n't meet , or he did it wrong.Non-story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if he correctly applied the Drake Equation, it seems the equation is wrong - the odds are clearly much higher than the equation predicts.But more likely, the formula makes assumptions his case doesn't meet, or he did it wrong.Non-story.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761430</id>
	<title>Been there, done that</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263411000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Big fucking whoop. I did this 10 years ago in high school. At least I wasn't emo enough to write a paper about it. And in the past decade while I have been dating people I realized that the simplified model was incorrect. You assume independence, but many things are positively correlated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Big fucking whoop .
I did this 10 years ago in high school .
At least I was n't emo enough to write a paper about it .
And in the past decade while I have been dating people I realized that the simplified model was incorrect .
You assume independence , but many things are positively correlated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Big fucking whoop.
I did this 10 years ago in high school.
At least I wasn't emo enough to write a paper about it.
And in the past decade while I have been dating people I realized that the simplified model was incorrect.
You assume independence, but many things are positively correlated.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759824</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263394620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I, like the Math loser, went to Warwick and can tell you it is one of the worst Universities in the country for quality muff (1 in 20 in my opinion is being generous). Had he surveyed more appropriate Universities such as Notingham or Leeds then he probably would have had a completely different result.

Also I  hate the fact that Warwick is deemed as being near London in the summary. It is actually about two and a half hours from London and if you drew a circle around London with Warwick being the radius it would include most of Southern England.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I , like the Math loser , went to Warwick and can tell you it is one of the worst Universities in the country for quality muff ( 1 in 20 in my opinion is being generous ) .
Had he surveyed more appropriate Universities such as Notingham or Leeds then he probably would have had a completely different result .
Also I hate the fact that Warwick is deemed as being near London in the summary .
It is actually about two and a half hours from London and if you drew a circle around London with Warwick being the radius it would include most of Southern England .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, like the Math loser, went to Warwick and can tell you it is one of the worst Universities in the country for quality muff (1 in 20 in my opinion is being generous).
Had he surveyed more appropriate Universities such as Notingham or Leeds then he probably would have had a completely different result.
Also I  hate the fact that Warwick is deemed as being near London in the summary.
It is actually about two and a half hours from London and if you drew a circle around London with Warwick being the radius it would include most of Southern England.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761990</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>VShael</author>
	<datestamp>1263463560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness?</i></p><p>He's probably just measuring one variable, bra size. And the statistics are available for this. In the UK, the average size is a 36C and follows a normal distribution.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness ? He 's probably just measuring one variable , bra size .
And the statistics are available for this .
In the UK , the average size is a 36C and follows a normal distribution .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness?He's probably just measuring one variable, bra size.
And the statistics are available for this.
In the UK, the average size is a 36C and follows a normal distribution.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762248</id>
	<title>University of Warwick, near London</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263467580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Haa, haaa, haaaa, haaaaaaaaaa. They dropped off 'the Earth, near Betelgeuse' from the address.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Haa , haaa , haaaa , haaaaaaaaaa .
They dropped off 'the Earth , near Betelgeuse ' from the address .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haa, haaa, haaaa, haaaaaaaaaa.
They dropped off 'the Earth, near Betelgeuse' from the address.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759006</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263389520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So basically you're telling us what we already know - that it's only American (and possibly Canadian) girls who only want to date morons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So basically you 're telling us what we already know - that it 's only American ( and possibly Canadian ) girls who only want to date morons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So basically you're telling us what we already know - that it's only American (and possibly Canadian) girls who only want to date morons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760066</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>mb1</author>
	<datestamp>1263396660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>on each occassion, how many drinks should I have?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>on each occassion , how many drinks should I have ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>on each occassion, how many drinks should I have?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758880</id>
	<title>Re:Stunt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263388980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No no no, this was a bad idea entirely.  Now if he <i>does</i> find someone, he won't be able to tell her "you're the only one", he just proved there are 25 other women he would like to be with!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No no no , this was a bad idea entirely .
Now if he does find someone , he wo n't be able to tell her " you 're the only one " , he just proved there are 25 other women he would like to be with !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No no no, this was a bad idea entirely.
Now if he does find someone, he won't be able to tell her "you're the only one", he just proved there are 25 other women he would like to be with!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762302</id>
	<title>Near London?</title>
	<author>SkunkPussy</author>
	<datestamp>1263468540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its nowhere near London. In units of Englands, its about 1/3 of an England further North. Not near London at all - its much closer to Birmingham, the 2nd city.</p><p>On a world-wide scale, yes the University of Warwick is near London, but then so is Africa.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its nowhere near London .
In units of Englands , its about 1/3 of an England further North .
Not near London at all - its much closer to Birmingham , the 2nd city.On a world-wide scale , yes the University of Warwick is near London , but then so is Africa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its nowhere near London.
In units of Englands, its about 1/3 of an England further North.
Not near London at all - its much closer to Birmingham, the 2nd city.On a world-wide scale, yes the University of Warwick is near London, but then so is Africa.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760632</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263402000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think they've heard of Liverpool. And that's it really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they 've heard of Liverpool .
And that 's it really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they've heard of Liverpool.
And that's it really.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30765538</id>
	<title>Tinfoil hat time!</title>
	<author>WinPimp2K</author>
	<datestamp>1263489300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No No No! (work with me here)</p><p>Y'all missed the really important part.</p><p>1&gt; He determined that his chances of finding a girlfriend were 100 times less likely(*) than finding an alien civilization.<br>2&gt; He found a girlfriend<br>3&gt; He also found 100 alien civilizations and the govenrment is concealing this information.<br>4&gt; He is keeping silent because his "girlfirend" is actually a really hot alien babe. She does not appear in photgraphs so it is a matter of conjecture as to her exact species. My source speculates that she is either an Orion slave girl, an Azerothian succbi, or a rare pygmy Na'vi.</p><p>(*) I know he claimed the inverse of this, but given the massive fudge factors involved in any solution of the Drake Equation, and realize that a piddly four oprders of magnitude is nothing to worry about. ALso remember points 3 and 4 above.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No No No !
( work with me here ) Y'all missed the really important part.1 &gt; He determined that his chances of finding a girlfriend were 100 times less likely ( * ) than finding an alien civilization.2 &gt; He found a girlfriend3 &gt; He also found 100 alien civilizations and the govenrment is concealing this information.4 &gt; He is keeping silent because his " girlfirend " is actually a really hot alien babe .
She does not appear in photgraphs so it is a matter of conjecture as to her exact species .
My source speculates that she is either an Orion slave girl , an Azerothian succbi , or a rare pygmy Na'vi .
( * ) I know he claimed the inverse of this , but given the massive fudge factors involved in any solution of the Drake Equation , and realize that a piddly four oprders of magnitude is nothing to worry about .
ALso remember points 3 and 4 above .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No No No!
(work with me here)Y'all missed the really important part.1&gt; He determined that his chances of finding a girlfriend were 100 times less likely(*) than finding an alien civilization.2&gt; He found a girlfriend3&gt; He also found 100 alien civilizations and the govenrment is concealing this information.4&gt; He is keeping silent because his "girlfirend" is actually a really hot alien babe.
She does not appear in photgraphs so it is a matter of conjecture as to her exact species.
My source speculates that she is either an Orion slave girl, an Azerothian succbi, or a rare pygmy Na'vi.
(*) I know he claimed the inverse of this, but given the massive fudge factors involved in any solution of the Drake Equation, and realize that a piddly four oprders of magnitude is nothing to worry about.
ALso remember points 3 and 4 above.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759378</id>
	<title>Re:What are the odds?</title>
	<author>Spy der Mann</author>
	<datestamp>1263391380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Good for him, but not very good for his theory...</p></div><p>Please allow me to quote Howard Wolowitz from the Big Bang Theory:<br>"But a better way to look at this is that I'm getting sex and you're not, and that's delightful!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good for him , but not very good for his theory...Please allow me to quote Howard Wolowitz from the Big Bang Theory : " But a better way to look at this is that I 'm getting sex and you 're not , and that 's delightful !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good for him, but not very good for his theory...Please allow me to quote Howard Wolowitz from the Big Bang Theory:"But a better way to look at this is that I'm getting sex and you're not, and that's delightful!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759798</id>
	<title>The real reason he can't find a girlfriend...</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1263394440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real reason he can't find a girlfriend?  He decided to use the Drake Equation to show why he doesn't have a girlfriend!</p><p>(Counts on Slashdot readership to not RTFA and thus not know that he actually has a girlfriend now.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real reason he ca n't find a girlfriend ?
He decided to use the Drake Equation to show why he does n't have a girlfriend !
( Counts on Slashdot readership to not RTFA and thus not know that he actually has a girlfriend now .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real reason he can't find a girlfriend?
He decided to use the Drake Equation to show why he doesn't have a girlfriend!
(Counts on Slashdot readership to not RTFA and thus not know that he actually has a girlfriend now.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761278</id>
	<title>Plaigiarism</title>
	<author>iceman81</author>
	<datestamp>1263409260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This idea  was proposed by the character Howard Wolowitz in season 2 of the sitcom "The Big Bang Theory". Am sure this was "inspired" by it. Almost academic plagiarism  since there is no citation to the original proponent.

Looking at his background phD candidate, academic et al (am from similar one) am pretty sure he is pretty keen watcher of the show.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This idea was proposed by the character Howard Wolowitz in season 2 of the sitcom " The Big Bang Theory " .
Am sure this was " inspired " by it .
Almost academic plagiarism since there is no citation to the original proponent .
Looking at his background phD candidate , academic et al ( am from similar one ) am pretty sure he is pretty keen watcher of the show .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This idea  was proposed by the character Howard Wolowitz in season 2 of the sitcom "The Big Bang Theory".
Am sure this was "inspired" by it.
Almost academic plagiarism  since there is no citation to the original proponent.
Looking at his background phD candidate, academic et al (am from similar one) am pretty sure he is pretty keen watcher of the show.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762550</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>serviscope\_minor</author>
	<datestamp>1263472200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Coventry is only 86 miles from London. </i></p><p>So? Since when has distance got much to do with it? Santa Fe is closer than Espanola to that. Yet you're about 1000000000000000\% more likely to die in Espanola. I expect I could pick examples from every state in the USA and pretty much all countries in the world. I'll bet even the city states have good areas and bad areas separated by an even smaller distance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Coventry is only 86 miles from London .
So ? Since when has distance got much to do with it ?
Santa Fe is closer than Espanola to that .
Yet you 're about 1000000000000000 \ % more likely to die in Espanola .
I expect I could pick examples from every state in the USA and pretty much all countries in the world .
I 'll bet even the city states have good areas and bad areas separated by an even smaller distance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coventry is only 86 miles from London.
So? Since when has distance got much to do with it?
Santa Fe is closer than Espanola to that.
Yet you're about 1000000000000000\% more likely to die in Espanola.
I expect I could pick examples from every state in the USA and pretty much all countries in the world.
I'll bet even the city states have good areas and bad areas separated by an even smaller distance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759116</id>
	<title>Re:So essentially</title>
	<author>trentblase</author>
	<datestamp>1263390120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He assumes only 1 in 20 women are attractive enough.  Maybe I'm a horn dog, but it seems that if you lined up 20 random women MY AGE, I would find more than one attractive enough to give a chance.  Either he's not accounting for correlation between the age requirements and the attractiveness requirements, or he seems extremely picky about looks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He assumes only 1 in 20 women are attractive enough .
Maybe I 'm a horn dog , but it seems that if you lined up 20 random women MY AGE , I would find more than one attractive enough to give a chance .
Either he 's not accounting for correlation between the age requirements and the attractiveness requirements , or he seems extremely picky about looks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He assumes only 1 in 20 women are attractive enough.
Maybe I'm a horn dog, but it seems that if you lined up 20 random women MY AGE, I would find more than one attractive enough to give a chance.
Either he's not accounting for correlation between the age requirements and the attractiveness requirements, or he seems extremely picky about looks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763074</id>
	<title>Redundant "Research" - Already done in 1999</title>
	<author>Unsichtbarer\_Mensch</author>
	<datestamp>1263478920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dunno if it has already been posted but I would like to draw your attention to work done in the late 90s by a dude named Tristan Miller on the subject:

<a href="http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Why\_I\_Will\_Never\_Have\_a\_Girlfriend" title="nothingisreal.com" rel="nofollow">http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Why\_I\_Will\_Never\_Have\_a\_Girlfriend</a> [nothingisreal.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dunno if it has already been posted but I would like to draw your attention to work done in the late 90s by a dude named Tristan Miller on the subject : http : //en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Why \ _I \ _Will \ _Never \ _Have \ _a \ _Girlfriend [ nothingisreal.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dunno if it has already been posted but I would like to draw your attention to work done in the late 90s by a dude named Tristan Miller on the subject:

http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Why\_I\_Will\_Never\_Have\_a\_Girlfriend [nothingisreal.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760108</id>
	<title>I blocked 'Idle'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263396960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So why am I seeing this shit on the front page?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So why am I seeing this shit on the front page ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So why am I seeing this shit on the front page?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759468</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't gonna help.</title>
	<author>The Wild Norseman</author>
	<datestamp>1263391920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Love is not reasonable and can not be reasoned with.</p></div><p>
So you're saying that love is kinda like a Terminator?  Can love show pity or remorse?  And love absolutely will not stop until I am dead?
<br> <br>
How about one of those female Terminators like in the third movie?  I want to have one of them stalking me.  With a flamethrower.  <br> <br>You know, 'cause love should be able to set my heart on fire as if it were one of those old junker cars sitting on the side of a road that the good guy ducks behind just before the flames splash overhead and igniting the gas tank making a huge, beautiful fireball into the sky.  Oh, hell yeah!  What I wouldn't give to have the sexy, nubile Terminator of love come and hunt.  Me.  Down.  Like the dog I am.
<br> <br>
But... pppfft.  Making a <i>math formula</i> regarding True Love?  What a loser.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Love is not reasonable and can not be reasoned with .
So you 're saying that love is kinda like a Terminator ?
Can love show pity or remorse ?
And love absolutely will not stop until I am dead ?
How about one of those female Terminators like in the third movie ?
I want to have one of them stalking me .
With a flamethrower .
You know , 'cause love should be able to set my heart on fire as if it were one of those old junker cars sitting on the side of a road that the good guy ducks behind just before the flames splash overhead and igniting the gas tank making a huge , beautiful fireball into the sky .
Oh , hell yeah !
What I would n't give to have the sexy , nubile Terminator of love come and hunt .
Me. Down .
Like the dog I am .
But... pppfft .
Making a math formula regarding True Love ?
What a loser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Love is not reasonable and can not be reasoned with.
So you're saying that love is kinda like a Terminator?
Can love show pity or remorse?
And love absolutely will not stop until I am dead?
How about one of those female Terminators like in the third movie?
I want to have one of them stalking me.
With a flamethrower.
You know, 'cause love should be able to set my heart on fire as if it were one of those old junker cars sitting on the side of a road that the good guy ducks behind just before the flames splash overhead and igniting the gas tank making a huge, beautiful fireball into the sky.
Oh, hell yeah!
What I wouldn't give to have the sexy, nubile Terminator of love come and hunt.
Me.  Down.
Like the dog I am.
But... pppfft.
Making a math formula regarding True Love?
What a loser.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758790</id>
	<title>idle</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263388560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF. This belongs in idle where I won't see it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF .
This belongs in idle where I wo n't see it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF.
This belongs in idle where I won't see it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759878</id>
	<title>Re:What? Nobody mentioning, that xkcd already did</title>
	<author>Psaakyrn</author>
	<datestamp>1263395040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're wrong.</p><p><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1509216&amp;cid=30758846" title="slashdot.org">http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1509216&amp;cid=30758846</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're wrong.http : //science.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1509216&amp;cid = 30758846 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're wrong.http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1509216&amp;cid=30758846 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762560</id>
	<title>Re:What are the odds?</title>
	<author>wdef</author>
	<datestamp>1263472500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The people who need to be worried are the outliers.</p></div><p>"Outlier" = "Geek"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The people who need to be worried are the outliers .
" Outlier " = " Geek "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The people who need to be worried are the outliers.
"Outlier" = "Geek"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30765362</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263488580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's indicative of the average American's aversion to geographical knowledge.</p><p>I recently rented "An American Werewolf in London". The beginning of the film is set in the Yorkshire Moors, but was filmed in Wales (that's the little bit that sticks out of the southwest part of England). The back of the DVD box said something about how the men were hiking on the moors in Wales (which is 100\% wrong).</p><p>I tried a GIS for the cover, couldn't find it, but there's a double DVD set of American Werewolves in London / Paris, and now it's 'the British moors', which is wrong too. Someone obviously wrote them a letter explaining how the Moors were in a part of England and not Wales (but both are in Britain) so the cover artist improved the fail.</p><p>You can add that cool story (bro) to Fox News anchors pronouncing the Maldives (pronounced 'mall-deeves) as the 'mall-dives' (which I assume is what mall divers do) during the tsunami a few years back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's indicative of the average American 's aversion to geographical knowledge.I recently rented " An American Werewolf in London " .
The beginning of the film is set in the Yorkshire Moors , but was filmed in Wales ( that 's the little bit that sticks out of the southwest part of England ) .
The back of the DVD box said something about how the men were hiking on the moors in Wales ( which is 100 \ % wrong ) .I tried a GIS for the cover , could n't find it , but there 's a double DVD set of American Werewolves in London / Paris , and now it 's 'the British moors ' , which is wrong too .
Someone obviously wrote them a letter explaining how the Moors were in a part of England and not Wales ( but both are in Britain ) so the cover artist improved the fail.You can add that cool story ( bro ) to Fox News anchors pronouncing the Maldives ( pronounced 'mall-deeves ) as the 'mall-dives ' ( which I assume is what mall divers do ) during the tsunami a few years back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's indicative of the average American's aversion to geographical knowledge.I recently rented "An American Werewolf in London".
The beginning of the film is set in the Yorkshire Moors, but was filmed in Wales (that's the little bit that sticks out of the southwest part of England).
The back of the DVD box said something about how the men were hiking on the moors in Wales (which is 100\% wrong).I tried a GIS for the cover, couldn't find it, but there's a double DVD set of American Werewolves in London / Paris, and now it's 'the British moors', which is wrong too.
Someone obviously wrote them a letter explaining how the Moors were in a part of England and not Wales (but both are in Britain) so the cover artist improved the fail.You can add that cool story (bro) to Fox News anchors pronouncing the Maldives (pronounced 'mall-deeves) as the 'mall-dives' (which I assume is what mall divers do) during the tsunami a few years back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761312</id>
	<title>Isn't this just a rip-off/variant of the old..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263409560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...article <a href="http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Why\_I\_Will\_Never\_Have\_a\_Girlfriend" title="nothingisreal.com" rel="nofollow">Why I Will Never Have a Girlfriend</a> [nothingisreal.com] written in 1999? I thougth that was written with a sprinkle more humor than this one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...article Why I Will Never Have a Girlfriend [ nothingisreal.com ] written in 1999 ?
I thougth that was written with a sprinkle more humor than this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...article Why I Will Never Have a Girlfriend [nothingisreal.com] written in 1999?
I thougth that was written with a sprinkle more humor than this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760480</id>
	<title>Re:Stunt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263400440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's not applying the Drake equation, as the Drake equation is a specific instance of what I've usually heard of as being called a "Fermi problem."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's not applying the Drake equation , as the Drake equation is a specific instance of what I 've usually heard of as being called a " Fermi problem .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's not applying the Drake equation, as the Drake equation is a specific instance of what I've usually heard of as being called a "Fermi problem.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30764244</id>
	<title>Tim Minchin</title>
	<author>naasking</author>
	<datestamp>1263485220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeZMIgheZro" title="youtube.com">Tim Minchin already explained this</a> [youtube.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But Tim Minchin already explained this [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But Tim Minchin already explained this [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760934</id>
	<title>Re:Where have I heard this before? Oh yeah...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263405060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or how about this episode of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matchmaker\_(How\_I\_Met\_Your\_Mother)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">How I Met Your Mother</a> [wikipedia.org]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or how about this episode of How I Met Your Mother [ wikipedia.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or how about this episode of How I Met Your Mother [wikipedia.org]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758652</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't gonna help.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263387960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like someone doesn't understand Statistics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like someone does n't understand Statistics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like someone doesn't understand Statistics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762684</id>
	<title>Re:What are the odds?</title>
	<author>machine321</author>
	<datestamp>1263473880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why?  He's just proven that there are aliens.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
He 's just proven that there are aliens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
He's just proven that there are aliens.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761136</id>
	<title>Intelligent Life</title>
	<author>dave87656</author>
	<datestamp>1263407760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the one hand his model is used to predict the chances of finding intelligent life in the universe. Lacking finding intelligent life, he's looking for a terrestrial girlfriend, the complete opposite. Coincidence? I think not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the one hand his model is used to predict the chances of finding intelligent life in the universe .
Lacking finding intelligent life , he 's looking for a terrestrial girlfriend , the complete opposite .
Coincidence ? I think not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the one hand his model is used to predict the chances of finding intelligent life in the universe.
Lacking finding intelligent life, he's looking for a terrestrial girlfriend, the complete opposite.
Coincidence? I think not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30770388</id>
	<title>Girls IN vs. FROM Soviet Russia...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263462360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think what you're confusing here is girls IN Soviet, or any other kind of, Russia/Eastern Bloc, and the girls you meet in the West (usually, the US, Israel, Germany, Canada, or Australia) who are FROM there.</p><p>The girls FROM Soviet Russia, et al, who tend to be from highly intellectual, extremely educated, intelligent, professional, etc. Jewish families (and nowadays some non-Jewish ones, as well), with overrepresentation of engineers and scientists among them and in their families, do indeed "dig intelligent guys" (and I say this who is one, and I'm pretty sure I've never dated a guy with a less than exceptional IQ or without a higher education). And the married couples you meet out West who were married in Soviet Russia, and might have led you to this belief (brilliant scientists and engineers happily married to each other, etc.) are again a product of their environment, where these same people all went into the scientific research institutes and met each other, residing entirely within "math is cool" cocoons.<br>However, those girls are not any more common than other smart, educated, bright, scientifically inclined girls. They are relatively common within their communities, but those communities are fairly limited in size (and ethnicity does matter...).</p><p>However, the tall, blond, confident, athletic, sexy, and otherwise model-attractive girls IN Russia, as a general population, are not any more interested in "intelligent guys" than any other group of girls (unless the "intelligent guy" happens to come with a US passport, which is another story). Oil barons and soccer players, on the other hand...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think what you 're confusing here is girls IN Soviet , or any other kind of , Russia/Eastern Bloc , and the girls you meet in the West ( usually , the US , Israel , Germany , Canada , or Australia ) who are FROM there.The girls FROM Soviet Russia , et al , who tend to be from highly intellectual , extremely educated , intelligent , professional , etc .
Jewish families ( and nowadays some non-Jewish ones , as well ) , with overrepresentation of engineers and scientists among them and in their families , do indeed " dig intelligent guys " ( and I say this who is one , and I 'm pretty sure I 've never dated a guy with a less than exceptional IQ or without a higher education ) .
And the married couples you meet out West who were married in Soviet Russia , and might have led you to this belief ( brilliant scientists and engineers happily married to each other , etc .
) are again a product of their environment , where these same people all went into the scientific research institutes and met each other , residing entirely within " math is cool " cocoons.However , those girls are not any more common than other smart , educated , bright , scientifically inclined girls .
They are relatively common within their communities , but those communities are fairly limited in size ( and ethnicity does matter... ) .However , the tall , blond , confident , athletic , sexy , and otherwise model-attractive girls IN Russia , as a general population , are not any more interested in " intelligent guys " than any other group of girls ( unless the " intelligent guy " happens to come with a US passport , which is another story ) .
Oil barons and soccer players , on the other hand.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think what you're confusing here is girls IN Soviet, or any other kind of, Russia/Eastern Bloc, and the girls you meet in the West (usually, the US, Israel, Germany, Canada, or Australia) who are FROM there.The girls FROM Soviet Russia, et al, who tend to be from highly intellectual, extremely educated, intelligent, professional, etc.
Jewish families (and nowadays some non-Jewish ones, as well), with overrepresentation of engineers and scientists among them and in their families, do indeed "dig intelligent guys" (and I say this who is one, and I'm pretty sure I've never dated a guy with a less than exceptional IQ or without a higher education).
And the married couples you meet out West who were married in Soviet Russia, and might have led you to this belief (brilliant scientists and engineers happily married to each other, etc.
) are again a product of their environment, where these same people all went into the scientific research institutes and met each other, residing entirely within "math is cool" cocoons.However, those girls are not any more common than other smart, educated, bright, scientifically inclined girls.
They are relatively common within their communities, but those communities are fairly limited in size (and ethnicity does matter...).However, the tall, blond, confident, athletic, sexy, and otherwise model-attractive girls IN Russia, as a general population, are not any more interested in "intelligent guys" than any other group of girls (unless the "intelligent guy" happens to come with a US passport, which is another story).
Oil barons and soccer players, on the other hand...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760112</id>
	<title>Trocadero: (Her Name Is) No One</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1263397020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where is the one who will mourn me when I'm gone<br>Who will pour water on my bed of dirt<br>Who will breathe fire on my neck at night</p><p>I heard someone say there's a chance that I will meet her<br>I could be Persephone and she Demeter<br>To pull me from the underground that I call home</p><p>Her name is no one, no one, no one<br>She blinds me with her eyes 'cause she's the one, the one<br>She lives somewhere not here, not here<br>Not here</p><p>My lovers are as smooth as a politician's tongue<br>The more I look for goodness, the more that I find none</p><p>I heard someone say, that she's honest and good.<br>Heard someone say, that she's honest and good.<br>Heard someone say, that she's honest and good.</p><p>Her name is no one, no one, no one<br>(Her name is...) No one, no one, no one, no one<br>No one, no one, no one, no one</p><p>Her name is no one, no one, no one<br>She blinds me with her eyes 'cause she's the one, the one<br>She lives somewhere not here, not here<br>NOT HERE NEVER HERE NEVER EVER EVER EVER!</p><p>I measure out my days with six of the Corona<br>I'm pretty sure she drives an old fucked up Corolla<br>To pull me from the underground that I call home</p><p>I've a funny feeling there's no chance that I will meet her<br>So I'll measure out my nights to my metronome's meter</p><p>(one two three four)<br>Her name is no one...<br>Her name is no one...<br>Her name is no one...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where is the one who will mourn me when I 'm goneWho will pour water on my bed of dirtWho will breathe fire on my neck at nightI heard someone say there 's a chance that I will meet herI could be Persephone and she DemeterTo pull me from the underground that I call homeHer name is no one , no one , no oneShe blinds me with her eyes 'cause she 's the one , the oneShe lives somewhere not here , not hereNot hereMy lovers are as smooth as a politician 's tongueThe more I look for goodness , the more that I find noneI heard someone say , that she 's honest and good.Heard someone say , that she 's honest and good.Heard someone say , that she 's honest and good.Her name is no one , no one , no one ( Her name is... ) No one , no one , no one , no oneNo one , no one , no one , no oneHer name is no one , no one , no oneShe blinds me with her eyes 'cause she 's the one , the oneShe lives somewhere not here , not hereNOT HERE NEVER HERE NEVER EVER EVER EVER ! I measure out my days with six of the CoronaI 'm pretty sure she drives an old fucked up CorollaTo pull me from the underground that I call homeI 've a funny feeling there 's no chance that I will meet herSo I 'll measure out my nights to my metronome 's meter ( one two three four ) Her name is no one...Her name is no one...Her name is no one.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where is the one who will mourn me when I'm goneWho will pour water on my bed of dirtWho will breathe fire on my neck at nightI heard someone say there's a chance that I will meet herI could be Persephone and she DemeterTo pull me from the underground that I call homeHer name is no one, no one, no oneShe blinds me with her eyes 'cause she's the one, the oneShe lives somewhere not here, not hereNot hereMy lovers are as smooth as a politician's tongueThe more I look for goodness, the more that I find noneI heard someone say, that she's honest and good.Heard someone say, that she's honest and good.Heard someone say, that she's honest and good.Her name is no one, no one, no one(Her name is...) No one, no one, no one, no oneNo one, no one, no one, no oneHer name is no one, no one, no oneShe blinds me with her eyes 'cause she's the one, the oneShe lives somewhere not here, not hereNOT HERE NEVER HERE NEVER EVER EVER EVER!I measure out my days with six of the CoronaI'm pretty sure she drives an old fucked up CorollaTo pull me from the underground that I call homeI've a funny feeling there's no chance that I will meet herSo I'll measure out my nights to my metronome's meter(one two three four)Her name is no one...Her name is no one...Her name is no one...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762610</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>delinear</author>
	<datestamp>1263473100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is always the issue when you use subjective data in a mathematical analysis - he can only ever base that data on his personal observations, and unless he's personally spent time - and I say spent time with rather than looked at and given an arbitrary score to because he doesn't quantify what is "attractive", in some women they might light up when they smile or laugh, in others it might be intelligence or a dry sense of humour, not just looks alone - with every single woman in London (or at least a statistically large and diverse enough subset to give a meaningful result), his data is fundamentally flawed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is always the issue when you use subjective data in a mathematical analysis - he can only ever base that data on his personal observations , and unless he 's personally spent time - and I say spent time with rather than looked at and given an arbitrary score to because he does n't quantify what is " attractive " , in some women they might light up when they smile or laugh , in others it might be intelligence or a dry sense of humour , not just looks alone - with every single woman in London ( or at least a statistically large and diverse enough subset to give a meaningful result ) , his data is fundamentally flawed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is always the issue when you use subjective data in a mathematical analysis - he can only ever base that data on his personal observations, and unless he's personally spent time - and I say spent time with rather than looked at and given an arbitrary score to because he doesn't quantify what is "attractive", in some women they might light up when they smile or laugh, in others it might be intelligence or a dry sense of humour, not just looks alone - with every single woman in London (or at least a statistically large and diverse enough subset to give a meaningful result), his data is fundamentally flawed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30765812</id>
	<title>Re:My own drake equation</title>
	<author>Dalzhim</author>
	<datestamp>1263490200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But then maybe after 12 relationships you'll realise the 3rd one was the ideal one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But then maybe after 12 relationships you 'll realise the 3rd one was the ideal one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But then maybe after 12 relationships you'll realise the 3rd one was the ideal one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761040</id>
	<title>Local man unable to get a girlfriend...</title>
	<author>igotmybfg</author>
	<datestamp>1263406620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...because he's too busy using the Drake equation to prove he can't get girlfriend</htmltext>
<tokenext>...because he 's too busy using the Drake equation to prove he ca n't get girlfriend</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...because he's too busy using the Drake equation to prove he can't get girlfriend</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758604</id>
	<title>Fussy much?</title>
	<author>Capsaicin</author>
	<datestamp>1263387720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>[Drake calculated that] of the 30 million women in the UK, only 26 would be suitable girlfriends for him.</p></div><p>There comes a point where being too particular about a mate becomes an evolutionary disadvantage.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ Drake calculated that ] of the 30 million women in the UK , only 26 would be suitable girlfriends for him.There comes a point where being too particular about a mate becomes an evolutionary disadvantage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[Drake calculated that] of the 30 million women in the UK, only 26 would be suitable girlfriends for him.There comes a point where being too particular about a mate becomes an evolutionary disadvantage.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30764010</id>
	<title>this is garbage.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263484320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lots of hand-waving, not published in a peer-reviewed journal.  Garbage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lots of hand-waving , not published in a peer-reviewed journal .
Garbage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lots of hand-waving, not published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Garbage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762700</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1263474240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe he's just misunderstood.</p><p>Guy: Hey, would you like to be my "GF"?</p><p>Girl 1: NO. (to herself: Why does he want me to be his goldfish?)</p><p>Girl 2: UR hot. Are you "SWM"?</p><p>Guy: NO. (to himself: What is she talking about? Southwest Michigan isn't hot in January.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe he 's just misunderstood.Guy : Hey , would you like to be my " GF " ? Girl 1 : NO .
( to herself : Why does he want me to be his goldfish ?
) Girl 2 : UR hot .
Are you " SWM " ? Guy : NO .
( to himself : What is she talking about ?
Southwest Michigan is n't hot in January .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe he's just misunderstood.Guy: Hey, would you like to be my "GF"?Girl 1: NO.
(to herself: Why does he want me to be his goldfish?
)Girl 2: UR hot.
Are you "SWM"?Guy: NO.
(to himself: What is she talking about?
Southwest Michigan isn't hot in January.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758772</id>
	<title>You have to hand it to the guy...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263388440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He did provide rock-solid proof of why he has no girlfriend. Sure, it's not the reason he though it was. But hey, lots of things were invented by accident. Like rubber, and the space shuttle!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He did provide rock-solid proof of why he has no girlfriend .
Sure , it 's not the reason he though it was .
But hey , lots of things were invented by accident .
Like rubber , and the space shuttle !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He did provide rock-solid proof of why he has no girlfriend.
Sure, it's not the reason he though it was.
But hey, lots of things were invented by accident.
Like rubber, and the space shuttle!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758896</id>
	<title>Drake equation aside...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263389040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Something similar was done in 1999. http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Why\_I\_Will\_Never\_Have\_a\_Girlfriend</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Something similar was done in 1999. http : //en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Why \ _I \ _Will \ _Never \ _Have \ _a \ _Girlfriend</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something similar was done in 1999. http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Why\_I\_Will\_Never\_Have\_a\_Girlfriend</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762942</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia...</title>
	<author>rwa2</author>
	<datestamp>1263477480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, you're looking in the wrong places...  the "easter bloc" chicks that have the sense to leave looking for better opportunities are more into intelligent guys<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P  Than the homebodies that you might find in local bars, at least ^\_^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , you 're looking in the wrong places... the " easter bloc " chicks that have the sense to leave looking for better opportunities are more into intelligent guys : P Than the homebodies that you might find in local bars , at least ^ \ _ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, you're looking in the wrong places...  the "easter bloc" chicks that have the sense to leave looking for better opportunities are more into intelligent guys :P  Than the homebodies that you might find in local bars, at least ^\_^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760146</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263397440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>About ten percent. Less,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>About ten percent .
Less,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About ten percent.
Less,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760624</id>
	<title>finding REQUITED LOVE</title>
	<author>alt154</author>
	<datestamp>1263401940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>of course he didn't include the odds of the other loving him back, which reduces his chances down to the same level as finding intelligent life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>of course he did n't include the odds of the other loving him back , which reduces his chances down to the same level as finding intelligent life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of course he didn't include the odds of the other loving him back, which reduces his chances down to the same level as finding intelligent life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758704</id>
	<title>In Soviet Russia...</title>
	<author>rwa2</author>
	<datestamp>1263388140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...the chicks actually dig intelligent guys.</p><p>Really.</p><p>So do chicks from just about any eastern bloc country for that matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...the chicks actually dig intelligent guys.Really.So do chicks from just about any eastern bloc country for that matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...the chicks actually dig intelligent guys.Really.So do chicks from just about any eastern bloc country for that matter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760904</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>compro01</author>
	<datestamp>1263404700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Okay - so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness?</p></div><p>Actually, a study found that what men find attractive is rather consistent.</p><p><a href="http://www.wfu.edu/news/release/2009.06.25.a.php" title="wfu.edu">http://www.wfu.edu/news/release/2009.06.25.a.php</a> [wfu.edu]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay - so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness ? Actually , a study found that what men find attractive is rather consistent.http : //www.wfu.edu/news/release/2009.06.25.a.php [ wfu.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay - so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness?Actually, a study found that what men find attractive is rather consistent.http://www.wfu.edu/news/release/2009.06.25.a.php [wfu.edu]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761626</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>codeButcher</author>
	<datestamp>1263500400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, you're right. And he also specified they should live in London.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , you 're right .
And he also specified they should live in London .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, you're right.
And he also specified they should live in London.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30764202</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>nortcele</author>
	<datestamp>1263485100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>Okay - so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness?</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>

There are stats on breast size.  Just plug in the values....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay - so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness ?
There are stats on breast size .
Just plug in the values... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Okay - so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness?
There are stats on breast size.
Just plug in the values....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761308</id>
	<title>Re:Big Bang Theory</title>
	<author>millette</author>
	<datestamp>1263409500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Indeed: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSkPLBIU3R4" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSkPLBIU3R4</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = WSkPLBIU3R4 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSkPLBIU3R4 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759660</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't gonna help.</title>
	<author>MrNaz</author>
	<datestamp>1263393240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know there's a joke about Schroedinger's Pussy in there somewhere, I just can't find it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know there 's a joke about Schroedinger 's Pussy in there somewhere , I just ca n't find it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know there's a joke about Schroedinger's Pussy in there somewhere, I just can't find it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728</id>
	<title>Ironically</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263388260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the reasons he can't find a girlfriend is because he is one of those people who USE the Drake equation. But seriously, look at his Criteria.</p><p>Backus found that of the 30 million women in the UK, only 26 would be suitable girlfriends for him. His equation looked at the total number of women in the country, then narrowed it down using relevant factors including the number of women in London; the number of "age-appropriate" women (those aged between 24-34); women with a college degree; and those who Backus would find physically attractive.</p><p>Okay - so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the reasons he ca n't find a girlfriend is because he is one of those people who USE the Drake equation .
But seriously , look at his Criteria.Backus found that of the 30 million women in the UK , only 26 would be suitable girlfriends for him .
His equation looked at the total number of women in the country , then narrowed it down using relevant factors including the number of women in London ; the number of " age-appropriate " women ( those aged between 24-34 ) ; women with a college degree ; and those who Backus would find physically attractive.Okay - so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the reasons he can't find a girlfriend is because he is one of those people who USE the Drake equation.
But seriously, look at his Criteria.Backus found that of the 30 million women in the UK, only 26 would be suitable girlfriends for him.
His equation looked at the total number of women in the country, then narrowed it down using relevant factors including the number of women in London; the number of "age-appropriate" women (those aged between 24-34); women with a college degree; and those who Backus would find physically attractive.Okay - so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761140</id>
	<title>Social Skills?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263407760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sitting around doing math equations...  Yeah, chicks dig that.  I'm guessing he didn't factor social skills into his equation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sitting around doing math equations... Yeah , chicks dig that .
I 'm guessing he did n't factor social skills into his equation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sitting around doing math equations...  Yeah, chicks dig that.
I'm guessing he didn't factor social skills into his equation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758714</id>
	<title>Self-evident reason...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263388200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh come on, it's obvious. He doesn't have a girlfriend because he is the type of guy who would use the Drake equation to figure out why he doesn't have a girlfriend. Duh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh come on , it 's obvious .
He does n't have a girlfriend because he is the type of guy who would use the Drake equation to figure out why he does n't have a girlfriend .
Duh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh come on, it's obvious.
He doesn't have a girlfriend because he is the type of guy who would use the Drake equation to figure out why he doesn't have a girlfriend.
Duh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759684</id>
	<title>My own drake equation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263393420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I work it in reverse. (And that does not mean "up the butt")</p><p>For every 3 girls I talk to, I'll get one number.<br>For every 3 numbers I get, I'll get a date.<br>For every 3 dates I get, I'll get a 2nd date.<br>For every 3 2nd dates I get I'll score.<br>For every 3 girls I score with I will continue to date.<br>So this means I'll actually have 1 in 243 chance of meeting a girl I like beyond just sex.<br>Given that I date about once a week (on average) that mean every 4.6 years I'll be in a relationship.</p><p>And checking my work, that works out to seem right.</p><p>I *HIGHLY* recommend the book "Mathematics and Sex" which I believe I bought because of a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. book review...</p><p>In it, it says 12 relationships is what you need to find your best match. Given 4.6 * 12, I'll be 56 before I find the one...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I work it in reverse .
( And that does not mean " up the butt " ) For every 3 girls I talk to , I 'll get one number.For every 3 numbers I get , I 'll get a date.For every 3 dates I get , I 'll get a 2nd date.For every 3 2nd dates I get I 'll score.For every 3 girls I score with I will continue to date.So this means I 'll actually have 1 in 243 chance of meeting a girl I like beyond just sex.Given that I date about once a week ( on average ) that mean every 4.6 years I 'll be in a relationship.And checking my work , that works out to seem right.I * HIGHLY * recommend the book " Mathematics and Sex " which I believe I bought because of a / .
book review...In it , it says 12 relationships is what you need to find your best match .
Given 4.6 * 12 , I 'll be 56 before I find the one.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I work it in reverse.
(And that does not mean "up the butt")For every 3 girls I talk to, I'll get one number.For every 3 numbers I get, I'll get a date.For every 3 dates I get, I'll get a 2nd date.For every 3 2nd dates I get I'll score.For every 3 girls I score with I will continue to date.So this means I'll actually have 1 in 243 chance of meeting a girl I like beyond just sex.Given that I date about once a week (on average) that mean every 4.6 years I'll be in a relationship.And checking my work, that works out to seem right.I *HIGHLY* recommend the book "Mathematics and Sex" which I believe I bought because of a /.
book review...In it, it says 12 relationships is what you need to find your best match.
Given 4.6 * 12, I'll be 56 before I find the one...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761150</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263407820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whether they have or not doesn't say whether they know the relative location of the cities. I'd heard of Coventry, but don't know where it is. Other than (now I know) not near London.</p><p>Americans don't exactly study the geography of England. How many English people do you think of have heard of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania? The metropolitan area is larger than Coventry(wikipedia says 500,000 compared to 300,000 people).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whether they have or not does n't say whether they know the relative location of the cities .
I 'd heard of Coventry , but do n't know where it is .
Other than ( now I know ) not near London.Americans do n't exactly study the geography of England .
How many English people do you think of have heard of Harrisburg , Pennsylvania ?
The metropolitan area is larger than Coventry ( wikipedia says 500,000 compared to 300,000 people ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whether they have or not doesn't say whether they know the relative location of the cities.
I'd heard of Coventry, but don't know where it is.
Other than (now I know) not near London.Americans don't exactly study the geography of England.
How many English people do you think of have heard of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania?
The metropolitan area is larger than Coventry(wikipedia says 500,000 compared to 300,000 people).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762906</id>
	<title>Re:Near London?</title>
	<author>maroberts</author>
	<datestamp>1263477120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Approximately 100 miles from the centre of London. BTW. Are you talking in units of Englands, or units of UKs? In these days of devolution and metrication, one must have clearly defined units.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Approximately 100 miles from the centre of London .
BTW. Are you talking in units of Englands , or units of UKs ?
In these days of devolution and metrication , one must have clearly defined units .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Approximately 100 miles from the centre of London.
BTW. Are you talking in units of Englands, or units of UKs?
In these days of devolution and metrication, one must have clearly defined units.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758690</id>
	<title>well...</title>
	<author>dr\_strang</author>
	<datestamp>1263388140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This bodes well for the possibility of finding alien life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This bodes well for the possibility of finding alien life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This bodes well for the possibility of finding alien life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758658</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't gonna help.</title>
	<author>Chyeld</author>
	<datestamp>1263387960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what you are saying is love is affected by the uncertainty principal and to observe it or attempt to quantify it in a meaningful manner fundamentally changes it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what you are saying is love is affected by the uncertainty principal and to observe it or attempt to quantify it in a meaningful manner fundamentally changes it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what you are saying is love is affected by the uncertainty principal and to observe it or attempt to quantify it in a meaningful manner fundamentally changes it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30779358</id>
	<title>Re:Where have I heard this before? Oh yeah...</title>
	<author>barberousse</author>
	<datestamp>1263573480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Why\_I\_Will\_Never\_Have\_a\_Girlfriend" title="nothingisreal.com" rel="nofollow">This</a> [nothingisreal.com] is pretty similar.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This [ nothingisreal.com ] is pretty similar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This [nothingisreal.com] is pretty similar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758644</id>
	<title>Where have I heard this before? Oh yeah...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263387900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is taken directly from this episode of <a href="http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio\_Episode.aspx?sched=1283" title="thisamericanlife.org">This American Life</a> [thisamericanlife.org] with Ira Glass.</p><p>-l</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is taken directly from this episode of This American Life [ thisamericanlife.org ] with Ira Glass.-l</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is taken directly from this episode of This American Life [thisamericanlife.org] with Ira Glass.-l</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758948</id>
	<title>Re:Stunt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263389280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <b>Common</b>, this is just a stunt in order to get his picture all over the net in order to find a girlfriend !</p></div><p>I thought it was quite an <b>uncommon</b> approach actually</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Common , this is just a stunt in order to get his picture all over the net in order to find a girlfriend ! I thought it was quite an uncommon approach actually</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Common, this is just a stunt in order to get his picture all over the net in order to find a girlfriend !I thought it was quite an uncommon approach actually
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763244</id>
	<title>Re:What are the odds?</title>
	<author>Philip\_the\_physicist</author>
	<datestamp>1263480120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Those on the low end may have to sample outside their species.</p></div><p>Maybe New Zealand should use his research in their next search for skilled migrants. Baaaa:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those on the low end may have to sample outside their species.Maybe New Zealand should use his research in their next search for skilled migrants .
Baaaa : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those on the low end may have to sample outside their species.Maybe New Zealand should use his research in their next search for skilled migrants.
Baaaa:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762336</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263469200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No seriously, he's cute!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No seriously , he 's cute !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No seriously, he's cute!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760576</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>feepness</author>
	<datestamp>1263401400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just walk around with a notebook and walk around, writing down whether women you see are attractive or not. When you've seen 50-ish women, you've got a decent statistical sample.</p></div><p>This depends on whether you do it outside WalMart or a fitness gym.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just walk around with a notebook and walk around , writing down whether women you see are attractive or not .
When you 've seen 50-ish women , you 've got a decent statistical sample.This depends on whether you do it outside WalMart or a fitness gym .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just walk around with a notebook and walk around, writing down whether women you see are attractive or not.
When you've seen 50-ish women, you've got a decent statistical sample.This depends on whether you do it outside WalMart or a fitness gym.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760164</id>
	<title>pick me, pick me!</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1263397620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>edinburgh</p><p>and... dublin!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>edinburghand... dublin !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>edinburghand... dublin!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30764406</id>
	<title>Re:My own drake equation</title>
	<author>Quirkz</author>
	<datestamp>1263485820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In it, it says 12 relationships is what you need to find your best match. Given 4.6 * 12, I'll be 56 before I find the one...</p></div><p>What happens when you realize that your first relationship was your best match, and they've all been downhill from there? By that time it's generally far too late to go back.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In it , it says 12 relationships is what you need to find your best match .
Given 4.6 * 12 , I 'll be 56 before I find the one...What happens when you realize that your first relationship was your best match , and they 've all been downhill from there ?
By that time it 's generally far too late to go back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In it, it says 12 relationships is what you need to find your best match.
Given 4.6 * 12, I'll be 56 before I find the one...What happens when you realize that your first relationship was your best match, and they've all been downhill from there?
By that time it's generally far too late to go back.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763344</id>
	<title>He narrowed his search too much.</title>
	<author>Restil</author>
	<datestamp>1263480720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's trying to find a GIRLFRIEND, not a wife.  Obviously, one would assume that the girlfriend might eventually become a wife, but since we're still at the girlfriend stage, the numbers can be adjusted a bit.  Remove the college degree requirement and the attractive requirement, and there will be plenty of opportunities.  I can certainly understand why someone is finding it difficult to find 30 year old, college educated, attractive women available who is also interested in return.</p><p>Remember... if at first you don't succeed, lower your standards.</p><p>-Restil</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's trying to find a GIRLFRIEND , not a wife .
Obviously , one would assume that the girlfriend might eventually become a wife , but since we 're still at the girlfriend stage , the numbers can be adjusted a bit .
Remove the college degree requirement and the attractive requirement , and there will be plenty of opportunities .
I can certainly understand why someone is finding it difficult to find 30 year old , college educated , attractive women available who is also interested in return.Remember... if at first you do n't succeed , lower your standards.-Restil</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's trying to find a GIRLFRIEND, not a wife.
Obviously, one would assume that the girlfriend might eventually become a wife, but since we're still at the girlfriend stage, the numbers can be adjusted a bit.
Remove the college degree requirement and the attractive requirement, and there will be plenty of opportunities.
I can certainly understand why someone is finding it difficult to find 30 year old, college educated, attractive women available who is also interested in return.Remember... if at first you don't succeed, lower your standards.-Restil</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759780</id>
	<title>Re:Stunt</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1263394320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once again, <a href="http://www.xkcd.com/523/" title="xkcd.com">life imitates xkcd</a> [xkcd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once again , life imitates xkcd [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once again, life imitates xkcd [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759634</id>
	<title>But once you have a girlfriend...</title>
	<author>beagle72</author>
	<datestamp>1263393060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What do you do when she behaves erratically? Consult <a href="http://www.iwritefunny.com/2008/07/29/microsoft-relationship-support/" title="iwritefunny.com" rel="nofollow">Microsoft Relationship Support</a> [iwritefunny.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What do you do when she behaves erratically ?
Consult Microsoft Relationship Support [ iwritefunny.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do you do when she behaves erratically?
Consult Microsoft Relationship Support [iwritefunny.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759476</id>
	<title>But ... does this work?</title>
	<author>gknoy</author>
	<datestamp>1263391980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>His equation was</p><p>G = R * Fw * Fl * Fa * Fu * Gb<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... where Fl was the fraction of UK women living in London.  Except<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... wouldn't the fact that he's already in London (and therefore not sampling women across the whole population) mean that he's only sampling women from London anyways?  Would that make that term drop out?  I guess I misunderstand its application.</p><p>Also, I suspect his Fb (fraction he finds attractive) is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... underestimated.  Would he really only find 5\% physically attractive?  I'd expect most men to consider any woman who's even above average to be attractive.  5\% sounds low, I'd think 30\% to 50\% (or not higher) is more likely.</p><p>He seems to have left off the fraction of those women that would find HIM attractive, but he does mention that (along with other factors) in his paper. I suspect he can't estimate those as well as the others.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>His equation wasG = R * Fw * Fl * Fa * Fu * Gb ... where Fl was the fraction of UK women living in London .
Except ... would n't the fact that he 's already in London ( and therefore not sampling women across the whole population ) mean that he 's only sampling women from London anyways ?
Would that make that term drop out ?
I guess I misunderstand its application.Also , I suspect his Fb ( fraction he finds attractive ) is ... underestimated. Would he really only find 5 \ % physically attractive ?
I 'd expect most men to consider any woman who 's even above average to be attractive .
5 \ % sounds low , I 'd think 30 \ % to 50 \ % ( or not higher ) is more likely.He seems to have left off the fraction of those women that would find HIM attractive , but he does mention that ( along with other factors ) in his paper .
I suspect he ca n't estimate those as well as the others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His equation wasG = R * Fw * Fl * Fa * Fu * Gb ... where Fl was the fraction of UK women living in London.
Except ... wouldn't the fact that he's already in London (and therefore not sampling women across the whole population) mean that he's only sampling women from London anyways?
Would that make that term drop out?
I guess I misunderstand its application.Also, I suspect his Fb (fraction he finds attractive) is ... underestimated.  Would he really only find 5\% physically attractive?
I'd expect most men to consider any woman who's even above average to be attractive.
5\% sounds low, I'd think 30\% to 50\% (or not higher) is more likely.He seems to have left off the fraction of those women that would find HIM attractive, but he does mention that (along with other factors) in his paper.
I suspect he can't estimate those as well as the others.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761298</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263409500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LOL</p><p>I am from Eastern Block and I can guarantee you most chicks over here dig money and confidence. Good luck with your illusion!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LOLI am from Eastern Block and I can guarantee you most chicks over here dig money and confidence .
Good luck with your illusion !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOLI am from Eastern Block and I can guarantee you most chicks over here dig money and confidence.
Good luck with your illusion!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759720</id>
	<title>Similar calculation</title>
	<author>Linknoid</author>
	<datestamp>1263393720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I once did a similar calculation for my city of 200,000, and came up with an answer of approximately 2.  At that point I concluded I would never find either one of them, and gave up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I once did a similar calculation for my city of 200,000 , and came up with an answer of approximately 2 .
At that point I concluded I would never find either one of them , and gave up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I once did a similar calculation for my city of 200,000, and came up with an answer of approximately 2.
At that point I concluded I would never find either one of them, and gave up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759898</id>
	<title>Re:But ... does this work?</title>
	<author>Barny</author>
	<datestamp>1263395220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except he is not in London, he is at school in Coventry. RTFA<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except he is not in London , he is at school in Coventry .
RTFA : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except he is not in London, he is at school in Coventry.
RTFA :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761190</id>
	<title>Re:What are the odds?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263408360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Proves there is intelligent life elsewhere in the galaxy, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Proves there is intelligent life elsewhere in the galaxy , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Proves there is intelligent life elsewhere in the galaxy, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759146</id>
	<title>What? Nobody mentioning, that xkcd already did it?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263390300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, or am I wrong?</p><p>I only can find this one: <a href="http://xkcd.com/384/" title="xkcd.com">http://xkcd.com/384/</a> [xkcd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , or am I wrong ? I only can find this one : http : //xkcd.com/384/ [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, or am I wrong?I only can find this one: http://xkcd.com/384/ [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761890</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263461580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This pissed me off too. Perhaps he can't get a girlfriend because he's trying to date Londoners while living a hundred miles away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This pissed me off too .
Perhaps he ca n't get a girlfriend because he 's trying to date Londoners while living a hundred miles away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This pissed me off too.
Perhaps he can't get a girlfriend because he's trying to date Londoners while living a hundred miles away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763646</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>alexo</author>
	<datestamp>1263482640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Has FOX News' target audience never heard of any English city besides London?</p></div></blockquote><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEP7uti0PDw" title="youtube.com">Budapest</a> [youtube.com]?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has FOX News ' target audience never heard of any English city besides London ?
Budapest [ youtube.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has FOX News' target audience never heard of any English city besides London?
Budapest [youtube.com]?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30766872</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>nukenerd</author>
	<datestamp>1263493620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You and others keep making this point, but he is no more sitting in his basement than you or I are, posting to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p><p>In fact this is the guys job.  He is a Maths postgraduate doing research.  Like engineers, car mechanics, accountants and even fashion designers, that involves some time not being out looking for a GF.  You think he should spend 100\% of his time chasing them?</p><p>As for your rule about meeting a lot of women, I agree, and that is precisely what comes out of his calculation as well. It's like throwing dice, that is his point.  I agree his numbers are too pessimistic.  But why do you say nobody actually does it?  I did (but the number "possible" in my case was not that huge, about 100).</p><p>In fact I did a similar calc some time ago but based on evidence from being in a dating club.  I calculated I had a 1 in 400 chance of scoring if I approached an atractive girl at random.  I adjusted my strategy accordingly and in fact did well.  What's was wrong with giving the matter some thought (which led to the calculation)?</p><p>I don't see doing a Drake equation causes not finding a GF - as long as you are not daft enough to tell them they might figure in your calculations.  Same as it would be unwise for an avid football supporter to tell a girl he was that.  But not finding a GF might cause you to do do the Drake equation project - that's the other way round.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You and others keep making this point , but he is no more sitting in his basement than you or I are , posting to /.In fact this is the guys job .
He is a Maths postgraduate doing research .
Like engineers , car mechanics , accountants and even fashion designers , that involves some time not being out looking for a GF .
You think he should spend 100 \ % of his time chasing them ? As for your rule about meeting a lot of women , I agree , and that is precisely what comes out of his calculation as well .
It 's like throwing dice , that is his point .
I agree his numbers are too pessimistic .
But why do you say nobody actually does it ?
I did ( but the number " possible " in my case was not that huge , about 100 ) .In fact I did a similar calc some time ago but based on evidence from being in a dating club .
I calculated I had a 1 in 400 chance of scoring if I approached an atractive girl at random .
I adjusted my strategy accordingly and in fact did well .
What 's was wrong with giving the matter some thought ( which led to the calculation ) ? I do n't see doing a Drake equation causes not finding a GF - as long as you are not daft enough to tell them they might figure in your calculations .
Same as it would be unwise for an avid football supporter to tell a girl he was that .
But not finding a GF might cause you to do do the Drake equation project - that 's the other way round .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You and others keep making this point, but he is no more sitting in his basement than you or I are, posting to /.In fact this is the guys job.
He is a Maths postgraduate doing research.
Like engineers, car mechanics, accountants and even fashion designers, that involves some time not being out looking for a GF.
You think he should spend 100\% of his time chasing them?As for your rule about meeting a lot of women, I agree, and that is precisely what comes out of his calculation as well.
It's like throwing dice, that is his point.
I agree his numbers are too pessimistic.
But why do you say nobody actually does it?
I did (but the number "possible" in my case was not that huge, about 100).In fact I did a similar calc some time ago but based on evidence from being in a dating club.
I calculated I had a 1 in 400 chance of scoring if I approached an atractive girl at random.
I adjusted my strategy accordingly and in fact did well.
What's was wrong with giving the matter some thought (which led to the calculation)?I don't see doing a Drake equation causes not finding a GF - as long as you are not daft enough to tell them they might figure in your calculations.
Same as it would be unwise for an avid football supporter to tell a girl he was that.
But not finding a GF might cause you to do do the Drake equation project - that's the other way round.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760238</id>
	<title>Re:What are the odds?</title>
	<author>marciot</author>
	<datestamp>1263398460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>His theory was wrong because it needs another term. One that accounts for your chances of making it to national media as a result of your calculations.</p><p>In galactic terms, the assumption of the Drake equation is that you won't raise a flashing neon sign the size of Jupiter, with the words "Intelligent life here, please drop by for a good time!". Doing so will render the equation invalid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>His theory was wrong because it needs another term .
One that accounts for your chances of making it to national media as a result of your calculations.In galactic terms , the assumption of the Drake equation is that you wo n't raise a flashing neon sign the size of Jupiter , with the words " Intelligent life here , please drop by for a good time ! " .
Doing so will render the equation invalid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His theory was wrong because it needs another term.
One that accounts for your chances of making it to national media as a result of your calculations.In galactic terms, the assumption of the Drake equation is that you won't raise a flashing neon sign the size of Jupiter, with the words "Intelligent life here, please drop by for a good time!".
Doing so will render the equation invalid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759826</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263394620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well the problem is that his parameters are not independent. Once he narrows down his age range, he's already eliminated a lot of unattractive women. Very few women in their 50s are attractive. The majority of women in their 20s are at least somewhat attractive. It doesn't seem right for him to throw out 95\% of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well the problem is that his parameters are not independent .
Once he narrows down his age range , he 's already eliminated a lot of unattractive women .
Very few women in their 50s are attractive .
The majority of women in their 20s are at least somewhat attractive .
It does n't seem right for him to throw out 95 \ % of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well the problem is that his parameters are not independent.
Once he narrows down his age range, he's already eliminated a lot of unattractive women.
Very few women in their 50s are attractive.
The majority of women in their 20s are at least somewhat attractive.
It doesn't seem right for him to throw out 95\% of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759584</id>
	<title>Seinfeld</title>
	<author>istartedi</author>
	<datestamp>1263392640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <tt>JERRY: Elaine, what percentage of people would you say are good looking?<br> <br>ELAINE: Twenty-five percent.<br> <br>JERRY: Twenty-five percent, you say? No way! It's like 4 to 6 percent. It's a twenty to one shot.<br> <br>ELAINE: You're way off.<br> <br>JERRY: Way off? Have you been to the motor vehicle bureau? It's like a leper colony down there.<br> <br>ELAINE: So what you are saying is that 90 to 95 percent of the population is undateable?<br> <br>JERRY: UNDATEABLE!<br> <br>ELAINE: Then how are all these people getting together?<br> <br>JERRY: Alcohol.</tt></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>JERRY : Elaine , what percentage of people would you say are good looking ?
ELAINE : Twenty-five percent .
JERRY : Twenty-five percent , you say ?
No way !
It 's like 4 to 6 percent .
It 's a twenty to one shot .
ELAINE : You 're way off .
JERRY : Way off ?
Have you been to the motor vehicle bureau ?
It 's like a leper colony down there .
ELAINE : So what you are saying is that 90 to 95 percent of the population is undateable ?
JERRY : UNDATEABLE !
ELAINE : Then how are all these people getting together ?
JERRY : Alcohol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> JERRY: Elaine, what percentage of people would you say are good looking?
ELAINE: Twenty-five percent.
JERRY: Twenty-five percent, you say?
No way!
It's like 4 to 6 percent.
It's a twenty to one shot.
ELAINE: You're way off.
JERRY: Way off?
Have you been to the motor vehicle bureau?
It's like a leper colony down there.
ELAINE: So what you are saying is that 90 to 95 percent of the population is undateable?
JERRY: UNDATEABLE!
ELAINE: Then how are all these people getting together?
JERRY: Alcohol. 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762690</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>machine321</author>
	<datestamp>1263474000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just walk around with a notebook and walk around</p></div><p>I can do that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just walk around with a notebook and walk aroundI can do that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just walk around with a notebook and walk aroundI can do that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762714</id>
	<title>Do as I did</title>
	<author>Mattskimo</author>
	<datestamp>1263474540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and cast your net further afield. American ladies love the accent and you can increase the chances of landing a bite from one you won't throw back by some simple pool selection. Universities are a good place to start. Whilst I would imagine that people with degrees are generally more intelligent than average, it's a pretty crude benchmark for intelligence. I have no degree (currently studying part time for a maths degree) but I consider myself more intelligent than a friend of mine with a 2:2 in Media, Culture and Communication.</htmltext>
<tokenext>and cast your net further afield .
American ladies love the accent and you can increase the chances of landing a bite from one you wo n't throw back by some simple pool selection .
Universities are a good place to start .
Whilst I would imagine that people with degrees are generally more intelligent than average , it 's a pretty crude benchmark for intelligence .
I have no degree ( currently studying part time for a maths degree ) but I consider myself more intelligent than a friend of mine with a 2 : 2 in Media , Culture and Communication .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and cast your net further afield.
American ladies love the accent and you can increase the chances of landing a bite from one you won't throw back by some simple pool selection.
Universities are a good place to start.
Whilst I would imagine that people with degrees are generally more intelligent than average, it's a pretty crude benchmark for intelligence.
I have no degree (currently studying part time for a maths degree) but I consider myself more intelligent than a friend of mine with a 2:2 in Media, Culture and Communication.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759422</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>Eudial</author>
	<datestamp>1263391620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Okay - so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness?</p></div><p>Just walk around with a notebook and walk around, writing down whether women you see are attractive or not. When you've seen 50-ish women, you've got a decent statistical sample.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay - so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness ? Just walk around with a notebook and walk around , writing down whether women you see are attractive or not .
When you 've seen 50-ish women , you 've got a decent statistical sample .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay - so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness?Just walk around with a notebook and walk around, writing down whether women you see are attractive or not.
When you've seen 50-ish women, you've got a decent statistical sample.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760826</id>
	<title>Re:Where have I heard this before? Oh yeah...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263403800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSkPLBIU3R4" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">The Big Bang Theory</a> [youtube.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and The Big Bang Theory [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and The Big Bang Theory [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761612</id>
	<title>Re:Where have I heard this before? Oh yeah...</title>
	<author>SlashDread</author>
	<datestamp>1263500220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I learned of this new provocative extrapolation on the Big Bang Theory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I learned of this new provocative extrapolation on the Big Bang Theory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I learned of this new provocative extrapolation on the Big Bang Theory.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758902</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't gonna help.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263389040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Love is not reasonable and can not be reasoned with.</i></p><p>So love is like the terminator. I'll be Backus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Love is not reasonable and can not be reasoned with.So love is like the terminator .
I 'll be Backus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Love is not reasonable and can not be reasoned with.So love is like the terminator.
I'll be Backus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760634</id>
	<title>Fermirotica</title>
	<author>Pfhorrest</author>
	<datestamp>1263402000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe you're thinking of "Fermirotica", #563: "On average, someone within distance <strong>r</strong> of you is having sex."

<a href="http://xkcd.com/563/" title="xkcd.com">http://xkcd.com/563/</a> [xkcd.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe you 're thinking of " Fermirotica " , # 563 : " On average , someone within distance r of you is having sex .
" http : //xkcd.com/563/ [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe you're thinking of "Fermirotica", #563: "On average, someone within distance r of you is having sex.
"

http://xkcd.com/563/ [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759242</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263390780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The more important question is: How does he think he will meet enough women at all, when he&rsquo;s sitting in his basement, doing Drake equations?</p><p>The simplest rule to meeting the right woman: Meet as many women as possible!<br>Obvious, isn&rsquo;t it? Yet nobody actually does it. Instead people usually search the Internet for help.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The more important question is : How does he think he will meet enough women at all , when he    s sitting in his basement , doing Drake equations ? The simplest rule to meeting the right woman : Meet as many women as possible ! Obvious , isn    t it ?
Yet nobody actually does it .
Instead people usually search the Internet for help .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The more important question is: How does he think he will meet enough women at all, when he’s sitting in his basement, doing Drake equations?The simplest rule to meeting the right woman: Meet as many women as possible!Obvious, isn’t it?
Yet nobody actually does it.
Instead people usually search the Internet for help.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759366</id>
	<title>Maybe</title>
	<author>CharlieG</author>
	<datestamp>1263391320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pesonally, I think he doesn't have a GF because he's the type of geek who thinks of explaining why he doesn't have a GF with the Drake equation</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pesonally , I think he does n't have a GF because he 's the type of geek who thinks of explaining why he does n't have a GF with the Drake equation</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pesonally, I think he doesn't have a GF because he's the type of geek who thinks of explaining why he doesn't have a GF with the Drake equation</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759432</id>
	<title>Re:What are the odds?</title>
	<author>tool462</author>
	<datestamp>1263391680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm thinking some of his numbers were off.  Particularly his estimate of the number of women in the acceptable age bracket.  He had 5\%, but I'm betting it's more like 68\% for your average person (+/- 1 standard deviation) and that's the combined concept of "people he would find attractive that would also find him attractive".  The human race simply would not exist if you could only bring yourself to schtup 5\% of the population and only 5\% of those would let you.  That already increases his chances by a factor of almost 300.  That brings his odds back to 1 in 1000, which seems reasonable and realistic.  Then factor in the number of women he can poll in his productive years in search of those 1/1000ths (compared to the number of planets he can poll for signs of civilization in his lifetime) and the odds of finding someone rapidly approach one.  Which makes intuitive sense, since as I mentioned before, the human race still exists.</p><p>The people who need to be worried are the outliers.  The folks who are 2 or 3 deviations from the mean in terms of attractiveness (physically, mentally, emotionally, materially).  Those on the high end may be forced to settle.  Those on the low end may have to sample outside their species.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm thinking some of his numbers were off .
Particularly his estimate of the number of women in the acceptable age bracket .
He had 5 \ % , but I 'm betting it 's more like 68 \ % for your average person ( + /- 1 standard deviation ) and that 's the combined concept of " people he would find attractive that would also find him attractive " .
The human race simply would not exist if you could only bring yourself to schtup 5 \ % of the population and only 5 \ % of those would let you .
That already increases his chances by a factor of almost 300 .
That brings his odds back to 1 in 1000 , which seems reasonable and realistic .
Then factor in the number of women he can poll in his productive years in search of those 1/1000ths ( compared to the number of planets he can poll for signs of civilization in his lifetime ) and the odds of finding someone rapidly approach one .
Which makes intuitive sense , since as I mentioned before , the human race still exists.The people who need to be worried are the outliers .
The folks who are 2 or 3 deviations from the mean in terms of attractiveness ( physically , mentally , emotionally , materially ) .
Those on the high end may be forced to settle .
Those on the low end may have to sample outside their species .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm thinking some of his numbers were off.
Particularly his estimate of the number of women in the acceptable age bracket.
He had 5\%, but I'm betting it's more like 68\% for your average person (+/- 1 standard deviation) and that's the combined concept of "people he would find attractive that would also find him attractive".
The human race simply would not exist if you could only bring yourself to schtup 5\% of the population and only 5\% of those would let you.
That already increases his chances by a factor of almost 300.
That brings his odds back to 1 in 1000, which seems reasonable and realistic.
Then factor in the number of women he can poll in his productive years in search of those 1/1000ths (compared to the number of planets he can poll for signs of civilization in his lifetime) and the odds of finding someone rapidly approach one.
Which makes intuitive sense, since as I mentioned before, the human race still exists.The people who need to be worried are the outliers.
The folks who are 2 or 3 deviations from the mean in terms of attractiveness (physically, mentally, emotionally, materially).
Those on the high end may be forced to settle.
Those on the low end may have to sample outside their species.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762006</id>
	<title>Error in equation</title>
	<author>mseeger</author>
	<datestamp>1263463800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He treats the parameters "age-appropriate" and "physically attractive" as independent from each other. I am seriously doubt that they are for him. Furthermore: The percentage of college degrees among women is higher in the goup aged 24-34 than in the group 80+. I'm not sure he takes this into account.</p><p>If i were a young, intelligent and attractive woman, i would aim for a guy with better math<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-).</p><p>CU, Martin</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He treats the parameters " age-appropriate " and " physically attractive " as independent from each other .
I am seriously doubt that they are for him .
Furthermore : The percentage of college degrees among women is higher in the goup aged 24-34 than in the group 80 + .
I 'm not sure he takes this into account.If i were a young , intelligent and attractive woman , i would aim for a guy with better math : - ) .CU , Martin</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He treats the parameters "age-appropriate" and "physically attractive" as independent from each other.
I am seriously doubt that they are for him.
Furthermore: The percentage of college degrees among women is higher in the goup aged 24-34 than in the group 80+.
I'm not sure he takes this into account.If i were a young, intelligent and attractive woman, i would aim for a guy with better math :-).CU, Martin</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760372</id>
	<title>Junk science</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263399600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just goes to show what a piece of bogus junk science that the Drake equation really is:  raw, unbridled grantsmanship at its worst.  It offers nothing in the way of predictability and only serves as a tool to entice funding from the stupid for what is, unfortunately, a worthy cause (SETI)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just goes to show what a piece of bogus junk science that the Drake equation really is : raw , unbridled grantsmanship at its worst .
It offers nothing in the way of predictability and only serves as a tool to entice funding from the stupid for what is , unfortunately , a worthy cause ( SETI )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just goes to show what a piece of bogus junk science that the Drake equation really is:  raw, unbridled grantsmanship at its worst.
It offers nothing in the way of predictability and only serves as a tool to entice funding from the stupid for what is, unfortunately, a worthy cause (SETI)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762552</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>slim</author>
	<datestamp>1263472260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>90 miles by car. Quite along way when you consider that the whole of England is 400 miles or so end to end.</p><p>The southern half of England is very densely populated compared to pretty much anywhere else in the world. A 90 mile journey is considered a long way, and you'd pass through/near several major conurbations en route.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>90 miles by car .
Quite along way when you consider that the whole of England is 400 miles or so end to end.The southern half of England is very densely populated compared to pretty much anywhere else in the world .
A 90 mile journey is considered a long way , and you 'd pass through/near several major conurbations en route .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>90 miles by car.
Quite along way when you consider that the whole of England is 400 miles or so end to end.The southern half of England is very densely populated compared to pretty much anywhere else in the world.
A 90 mile journey is considered a long way, and you'd pass through/near several major conurbations en route.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762654</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1263473700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Has FOX News' target audience never heard of any English city besides London?</p></div><p>Well, I had heard of "Manchester", but I thought it was some English boarding school/Royal Navy thing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has FOX News ' target audience never heard of any English city besides London ? Well , I had heard of " Manchester " , but I thought it was some English boarding school/Royal Navy thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has FOX News' target audience never heard of any English city besides London?Well, I had heard of "Manchester", but I thought it was some English boarding school/Royal Navy thing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762962</id>
	<title>Intelligent life on earth</title>
	<author>ath1901</author>
	<datestamp>1263477660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think he just proved there is not much intelligent life on earth.</p><p>"The probability of finding love in the UK is only about 100 times better than the probability of finding intelligent life in our galaxy"</p><p>Assume the chance of finding love in the UK is 10\%, then the chance of finding intelligent life anywhere in our galaxy is 0.1\%.<br>That makes intelligent life on earth (subset of our galaxy) less likely than 0.1\%!<br>That explains a lot...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think he just proved there is not much intelligent life on earth .
" The probability of finding love in the UK is only about 100 times better than the probability of finding intelligent life in our galaxy " Assume the chance of finding love in the UK is 10 \ % , then the chance of finding intelligent life anywhere in our galaxy is 0.1 \ % .That makes intelligent life on earth ( subset of our galaxy ) less likely than 0.1 \ % ! That explains a lot.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think he just proved there is not much intelligent life on earth.
"The probability of finding love in the UK is only about 100 times better than the probability of finding intelligent life in our galaxy"Assume the chance of finding love in the UK is 10\%, then the chance of finding intelligent life anywhere in our galaxy is 0.1\%.That makes intelligent life on earth (subset of our galaxy) less likely than 0.1\%!That explains a lot...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758748</id>
	<title>Big Bang Theory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263388380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wasn't this done on the big bang theory?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't this done on the big bang theory ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't this done on the big bang theory?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762516</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>wdef</author>
	<datestamp>1263471660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness?</p></div><p>Very easily and it's been done quite a lot - because physical attractiveness is not very subjective. Certain facial geometries and physical attractiveness correlate very strongly and this is proven and consistent across cultures.</p><p>

Sexual biology is the ultimate fascist.  Haven't you noticed how much easier it is for very good looking people to attract the opposite sex, even if they're a complete asshole/nerd?  "Nice personality" rates a long way down if you're a 10 on the Uglymeter.</p><p>

Very pretty Geeks usually have girls.  As the old saying goes:  beauty may be only skin deep, but ugly goes way down, layer after layer<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>

Plastic surgery could in fact be a very good investment.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness ? Very easily and it 's been done quite a lot - because physical attractiveness is not very subjective .
Certain facial geometries and physical attractiveness correlate very strongly and this is proven and consistent across cultures .
Sexual biology is the ultimate fascist .
Have n't you noticed how much easier it is for very good looking people to attract the opposite sex , even if they 're a complete asshole/nerd ?
" Nice personality " rates a long way down if you 're a 10 on the Uglymeter .
Very pretty Geeks usually have girls .
As the old saying goes : beauty may be only skin deep , but ugly goes way down , layer after layer .. . Plastic surgery could in fact be a very good investment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness?Very easily and it's been done quite a lot - because physical attractiveness is not very subjective.
Certain facial geometries and physical attractiveness correlate very strongly and this is proven and consistent across cultures.
Sexual biology is the ultimate fascist.
Haven't you noticed how much easier it is for very good looking people to attract the opposite sex, even if they're a complete asshole/nerd?
"Nice personality" rates a long way down if you're a 10 on the Uglymeter.
Very pretty Geeks usually have girls.
As the old saying goes:  beauty may be only skin deep, but ugly goes way down, layer after layer ...

Plastic surgery could in fact be a very good investment.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763446</id>
	<title>Communication</title>
	<author>AlpineR</author>
	<datestamp>1263481500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Backus found that there are 26 women <em>in London</em> who match his outrageously narrow criteria. He doesn't have to search all of the UK, just his own city. Now if he searches for them by randomly calling numbers in the phone book and asking the answerer if she's the one, then yes it will take many years to find her. But if he networks a little and asks the answerer if they might know the woman he's searching for then he'll find her much faster.</p><p>Or maybe he can do something crazy like hang out around a university where those intelligent, educated, interesting women might already be. Or go to social gatherings with people his age, where the population is already self-selected for women meeting his age, geographic, and availability requirements. Neglecting the factor of locality and self-selection is like declaring that the International Space Station has only a 0.00000003\% chance of harboring intelligent life since it's just one of billions of objects in the galaxy.</p><p>Or maybe this genius should try Internet dating. There are 26 fabulous women whom he's a perfect match for within ten miles of him. If he posts on the most popular dating sites, what are the chances that one of them will find him there within one year?</p><p>And remember, that's 26 perfect women in London even if he's attracted to only 5\% of the highly-educated women his age. Seriously? Who here found only 5\% of their gender-appropriate college classmates attractive? And he narrows the pool twice, supposing that only 5\% of the women that he finds attractive will find him attractive. That ignores the correlation of people being attracted to mates that match their own racial, genetic, and social background. Bumping those numbers to a more realistic 25\% would give him 657 wonderful, beautiful, interesting, intelligent, friendly, available, captivated, local women to date.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Backus found that there are 26 women in London who match his outrageously narrow criteria .
He does n't have to search all of the UK , just his own city .
Now if he searches for them by randomly calling numbers in the phone book and asking the answerer if she 's the one , then yes it will take many years to find her .
But if he networks a little and asks the answerer if they might know the woman he 's searching for then he 'll find her much faster.Or maybe he can do something crazy like hang out around a university where those intelligent , educated , interesting women might already be .
Or go to social gatherings with people his age , where the population is already self-selected for women meeting his age , geographic , and availability requirements .
Neglecting the factor of locality and self-selection is like declaring that the International Space Station has only a 0.00000003 \ % chance of harboring intelligent life since it 's just one of billions of objects in the galaxy.Or maybe this genius should try Internet dating .
There are 26 fabulous women whom he 's a perfect match for within ten miles of him .
If he posts on the most popular dating sites , what are the chances that one of them will find him there within one year ? And remember , that 's 26 perfect women in London even if he 's attracted to only 5 \ % of the highly-educated women his age .
Seriously ? Who here found only 5 \ % of their gender-appropriate college classmates attractive ?
And he narrows the pool twice , supposing that only 5 \ % of the women that he finds attractive will find him attractive .
That ignores the correlation of people being attracted to mates that match their own racial , genetic , and social background .
Bumping those numbers to a more realistic 25 \ % would give him 657 wonderful , beautiful , interesting , intelligent , friendly , available , captivated , local women to date .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Backus found that there are 26 women in London who match his outrageously narrow criteria.
He doesn't have to search all of the UK, just his own city.
Now if he searches for them by randomly calling numbers in the phone book and asking the answerer if she's the one, then yes it will take many years to find her.
But if he networks a little and asks the answerer if they might know the woman he's searching for then he'll find her much faster.Or maybe he can do something crazy like hang out around a university where those intelligent, educated, interesting women might already be.
Or go to social gatherings with people his age, where the population is already self-selected for women meeting his age, geographic, and availability requirements.
Neglecting the factor of locality and self-selection is like declaring that the International Space Station has only a 0.00000003\% chance of harboring intelligent life since it's just one of billions of objects in the galaxy.Or maybe this genius should try Internet dating.
There are 26 fabulous women whom he's a perfect match for within ten miles of him.
If he posts on the most popular dating sites, what are the chances that one of them will find him there within one year?And remember, that's 26 perfect women in London even if he's attracted to only 5\% of the highly-educated women his age.
Seriously? Who here found only 5\% of their gender-appropriate college classmates attractive?
And he narrows the pool twice, supposing that only 5\% of the women that he finds attractive will find him attractive.
That ignores the correlation of people being attracted to mates that match their own racial, genetic, and social background.
Bumping those numbers to a more realistic 25\% would give him 657 wonderful, beautiful, interesting, intelligent, friendly, available, captivated, local women to date.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760482</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263400500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Has FOX News' target audience never heard of any English city besides London?</p></div></blockquote><p>No.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has FOX News ' target audience never heard of any English city besides London ? No .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has FOX News' target audience never heard of any English city besides London?No.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763684</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>Gulthek</author>
	<datestamp>1263482880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In my personal experience, he is *way* underestimating physical attractiveness. 1 in 20 for his age group? More like 1 in 5, and that's conservative.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In my personal experience , he is * way * underestimating physical attractiveness .
1 in 20 for his age group ?
More like 1 in 5 , and that 's conservative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my personal experience, he is *way* underestimating physical attractiveness.
1 in 20 for his age group?
More like 1 in 5, and that's conservative.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760252</id>
	<title>Its improbable NOT to find a girlfriend</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263398700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He only finds the top 5\% of women attractive maybe 20\% of my female acquaintances (of the appropriate age group) are not attractive enough to date. And I would date them anyway if they happened to nail all the other criteria. Maybe he should have just considered that one factor to make it more likely.</p><p>Further he assumes that he is meeting people at random, which is NEVER the case. Where do I meet girls? At parties that are already pre-screened by friends or the hosts for girls within my age range and interests (most social gatherings) or education level and likely interests (most professional  gatherings).</p><p>Finally, flipping my facebook status to single would activate 100+ agents (friends, family, coworkers in the area) to find the 20 or so girls that fit these criteria, not to mention that those 20 or so girls already have 2,000 agents (assuming  we are not already all on the same networks as I showed in the last paragraph) hunting for me.</p><p>All that failing, I could always hit the personals to try and make contact with one of those 2,000 agents looking for me.</p><p>Anyone should be able to see from the above facts that it is extremely improbable not to have potential SOs around, which I would give some credence to from personal experience as well as the fact that he finds a girl that meets all his criteria.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He only finds the top 5 \ % of women attractive maybe 20 \ % of my female acquaintances ( of the appropriate age group ) are not attractive enough to date .
And I would date them anyway if they happened to nail all the other criteria .
Maybe he should have just considered that one factor to make it more likely.Further he assumes that he is meeting people at random , which is NEVER the case .
Where do I meet girls ?
At parties that are already pre-screened by friends or the hosts for girls within my age range and interests ( most social gatherings ) or education level and likely interests ( most professional gatherings ) .Finally , flipping my facebook status to single would activate 100 + agents ( friends , family , coworkers in the area ) to find the 20 or so girls that fit these criteria , not to mention that those 20 or so girls already have 2,000 agents ( assuming we are not already all on the same networks as I showed in the last paragraph ) hunting for me.All that failing , I could always hit the personals to try and make contact with one of those 2,000 agents looking for me.Anyone should be able to see from the above facts that it is extremely improbable not to have potential SOs around , which I would give some credence to from personal experience as well as the fact that he finds a girl that meets all his criteria .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He only finds the top 5\% of women attractive maybe 20\% of my female acquaintances (of the appropriate age group) are not attractive enough to date.
And I would date them anyway if they happened to nail all the other criteria.
Maybe he should have just considered that one factor to make it more likely.Further he assumes that he is meeting people at random, which is NEVER the case.
Where do I meet girls?
At parties that are already pre-screened by friends or the hosts for girls within my age range and interests (most social gatherings) or education level and likely interests (most professional  gatherings).Finally, flipping my facebook status to single would activate 100+ agents (friends, family, coworkers in the area) to find the 20 or so girls that fit these criteria, not to mention that those 20 or so girls already have 2,000 agents (assuming  we are not already all on the same networks as I showed in the last paragraph) hunting for me.All that failing, I could always hit the personals to try and make contact with one of those 2,000 agents looking for me.Anyone should be able to see from the above facts that it is extremely improbable not to have potential SOs around, which I would give some credence to from personal experience as well as the fact that he finds a girl that meets all his criteria.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30781376</id>
	<title>Game theory to manage family chores demands</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263582300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is nothing. 30 years ago (yeah! Im THAT old. Now get off my lawn and listen to this story from the street, damn kids!) I used to live in an extended family home, with several cousins, uncles, aunts, grandparents. Needless to say, there were insanely competing demands on my time! So I came up with a classic game theoretic model to with weights for how much I could piss off which family member, and weights for my own priorities - study, goofing off, that kind of stuff. Earlier, where most family members were mad with me, and some were super happy. But after this model, everyone was equally happy with my ability to help around. I soon rose, much to my cousins' wonderment, to be the family alpha teen<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is nothing .
30 years ago ( yeah !
Im THAT old .
Now get off my lawn and listen to this story from the street , damn kids !
) I used to live in an extended family home , with several cousins , uncles , aunts , grandparents .
Needless to say , there were insanely competing demands on my time !
So I came up with a classic game theoretic model to with weights for how much I could piss off which family member , and weights for my own priorities - study , goofing off , that kind of stuff .
Earlier , where most family members were mad with me , and some were super happy .
But after this model , everyone was equally happy with my ability to help around .
I soon rose , much to my cousins ' wonderment , to be the family alpha teen : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is nothing.
30 years ago (yeah!
Im THAT old.
Now get off my lawn and listen to this story from the street, damn kids!
) I used to live in an extended family home, with several cousins, uncles, aunts, grandparents.
Needless to say, there were insanely competing demands on my time!
So I came up with a classic game theoretic model to with weights for how much I could piss off which family member, and weights for my own priorities - study, goofing off, that kind of stuff.
Earlier, where most family members were mad with me, and some were super happy.
But after this model, everyone was equally happy with my ability to help around.
I soon rose, much to my cousins' wonderment, to be the family alpha teen :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761974</id>
	<title>Re:Stunt</title>
	<author>VShael</author>
	<datestamp>1263463320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sort of a reverse Heisenberg situation, where the results of the probability equation change (increase) the sooner I stop calculating it?</p><p>Hmm. I wonder if we shut down SETI, would aliens arrive the next day?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sort of a reverse Heisenberg situation , where the results of the probability equation change ( increase ) the sooner I stop calculating it ? Hmm .
I wonder if we shut down SETI , would aliens arrive the next day ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sort of a reverse Heisenberg situation, where the results of the probability equation change (increase) the sooner I stop calculating it?Hmm.
I wonder if we shut down SETI, would aliens arrive the next day?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763594</id>
	<title>Re:What are the odds?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263482400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll have the third donkey on the left please!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll have the third donkey on the left please !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll have the third donkey on the left please!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759658</id>
	<title>Re:Big Bang Theory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263393240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Wolowitz coefficient<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... neediness times dress size squared!</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4CYSHV84jY" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4CYSHV84jY</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>Starts around 2:10</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Wolowitz coefficient ... neediness times dress size squared ! http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = P4CYSHV84jY [ youtube.com ] Starts around 2 : 10</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Wolowitz coefficient ... neediness times dress size squared!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4CYSHV84jY [youtube.com]Starts around 2:10</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758868</id>
	<title>Re:So essentially</title>
	<author>Thiez</author>
	<datestamp>1263388920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually they appear to be quite reasonable. Go RTFA (or actually the pdf on the page that TFA links to).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually they appear to be quite reasonable .
Go RTFA ( or actually the pdf on the page that TFA links to ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually they appear to be quite reasonable.
Go RTFA (or actually the pdf on the page that TFA links to).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762822</id>
	<title>One word: Russia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263476100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or maybe anywhere in SE Asia as well if you want two words.  But, man, I have *never* seen so many hot looking women as during a visit to Moscow in the summertime some years back. The mind (or rather another part of the anatomy) simply boggles.  It was very clear why they export so many women to ugly Western countries.<p>

There are all racial physiognomies in Moscow - most notably blond transparent Scandinavian-looking honies, eastern looking former CIS girls, brown skinned girls, olive skinned Georgians.  When it is hot they wear skimpy clothing.  Not many fatties (before they get marries at least).  And a good age range too.  The singles can keep looking good even into the 40s (lack of UV from the sun this far North).</p><p>

You want a 10 with a PhD in neurosurgery and a brilliant classical pianist to boot?  No problem, you could find one in Moscow.  I wish I was in a position to do more about that. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or maybe anywhere in SE Asia as well if you want two words .
But , man , I have * never * seen so many hot looking women as during a visit to Moscow in the summertime some years back .
The mind ( or rather another part of the anatomy ) simply boggles .
It was very clear why they export so many women to ugly Western countries .
There are all racial physiognomies in Moscow - most notably blond transparent Scandinavian-looking honies , eastern looking former CIS girls , brown skinned girls , olive skinned Georgians .
When it is hot they wear skimpy clothing .
Not many fatties ( before they get marries at least ) .
And a good age range too .
The singles can keep looking good even into the 40s ( lack of UV from the sun this far North ) .
You want a 10 with a PhD in neurosurgery and a brilliant classical pianist to boot ?
No problem , you could find one in Moscow .
I wish I was in a position to do more about that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or maybe anywhere in SE Asia as well if you want two words.
But, man, I have *never* seen so many hot looking women as during a visit to Moscow in the summertime some years back.
The mind (or rather another part of the anatomy) simply boggles.
It was very clear why they export so many women to ugly Western countries.
There are all racial physiognomies in Moscow - most notably blond transparent Scandinavian-looking honies, eastern looking former CIS girls, brown skinned girls, olive skinned Georgians.
When it is hot they wear skimpy clothing.
Not many fatties (before they get marries at least).
And a good age range too.
The singles can keep looking good even into the 40s (lack of UV from the sun this far North).
You want a 10 with a PhD in neurosurgery and a brilliant classical pianist to boot?
No problem, you could find one in Moscow.
I wish I was in a position to do more about that. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758930</id>
	<title>real reason</title>
	<author>freezway</author>
	<datestamp>1263389160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the real reason is:
who want to date someone who uses the drake equation to find this stuff out?</htmltext>
<tokenext>the real reason is : who want to date someone who uses the drake equation to find this stuff out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the real reason is:
who want to date someone who uses the drake equation to find this stuff out?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762616</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>the\_womble</author>
	<datestamp>1263473220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Okay - so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness?</p></div><p>Just walk around with a notebook and walk around, writing down whether women you see are attractive or not. When you've seen 50-ish women, you've got a decent statistical sample.</p></div><p>Walk around noting stuff win a notebook in London, and you will probably get arrested under the Prevention of Terrorism Act.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay - so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness ? Just walk around with a notebook and walk around , writing down whether women you see are attractive or not .
When you 've seen 50-ish women , you 've got a decent statistical sample.Walk around noting stuff win a notebook in London , and you will probably get arrested under the Prevention of Terrorism Act .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay - so how do you POSSIBLY apply a statistical analysis on something as subjective as a womans physical attractiveness?Just walk around with a notebook and walk around, writing down whether women you see are attractive or not.
When you've seen 50-ish women, you've got a decent statistical sample.Walk around noting stuff win a notebook in London, and you will probably get arrested under the Prevention of Terrorism Act.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758888</id>
	<title>Re:So essentially</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263389040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>luckily for him, HE GOT THE MATH WRONG.</p><p>He forgot that women are picky too, so the fact that he's got a lot going for him makes him much more attractive to women in his target group than if the selection was random.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>luckily for him , HE GOT THE MATH WRONG.He forgot that women are picky too , so the fact that he 's got a lot going for him makes him much more attractive to women in his target group than if the selection was random .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>luckily for him, HE GOT THE MATH WRONG.He forgot that women are picky too, so the fact that he's got a lot going for him makes him much more attractive to women in his target group than if the selection was random.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759486</id>
	<title>Maybe...</title>
	<author>Nidi62</author>
	<datestamp>1263392100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe if he had spent the time and effort he did writing the paper on going out and trying to find a girlfriend instead, he'd have had one?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe if he had spent the time and effort he did writing the paper on going out and trying to find a girlfriend instead , he 'd have had one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe if he had spent the time and effort he did writing the paper on going out and trying to find a girlfriend instead, he'd have had one?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30771846</id>
	<title>Re:My own drake equation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263468000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>For every 3 2nd dates I get I'll score.<br>For every 3 girls I score with I will continue to date.<br>So this means I'll actually have 1 in 243 chance of meeting a girl I like beyond just sex.</i></p><p>Interestingly, in your case, you're probably absolutely right that you will be 56 before you find the one, but not quite due to the lack of girls to date.</p><p>Given that you figure you'll score with 1 of 3 2nd dates, but would only want to have an actual relationship with 1 out of 3 of those, i.e. 1 of 9 2nd dates, it's pretty clear that you are currently dating primarily to, as you put it, score, and only secondarily to have a relationship. Given that criteria, you are, indeed, not very likely to find the kind of girl who would be "the one" to a Slashdot reader until you're 56, if ever. Having a relationship only once every 4.6 years, while dating approximately once a week, again seems to indicate that you're dating not quite for the purposes of having a relationship.</p><p>Were you to change your habits, and actually attempt to date for the purpose of having a relationship, you might then revisit the kinds of girls you try to date, and in fact focus more on girls you are likely to actually want to have a relationship with, or who are generally more "relationship material," as opposed to a quick score, and your chances of having a relationship and/or finding "the one" will increase exponentially. (For one thing, if you were to have a relationship with 1 out of 3, and not 1 out of 9, second dates, instead of scoring with 1 out of 3, etc., your chances would rise 3-fold immediately).</p><p>I find it rather incredible how many supposedly "smart" guys have not managed to grasp that if you look for a "relationship" or "the one" in bars or other places where you're likely to get a quick score, and then trying to find "the one" out of that population, you are also creating bias in your sample, as the kinds of girls you might actually want to have a relationship with might not be hanging out in bars for a quick score in the first place.</p><p>Consider it a variation of the Heisenberg Uncertainly Principle: the act of choosing where to pick up girls affects the kinds of girls that are available for you to pick up...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For every 3 2nd dates I get I 'll score.For every 3 girls I score with I will continue to date.So this means I 'll actually have 1 in 243 chance of meeting a girl I like beyond just sex.Interestingly , in your case , you 're probably absolutely right that you will be 56 before you find the one , but not quite due to the lack of girls to date.Given that you figure you 'll score with 1 of 3 2nd dates , but would only want to have an actual relationship with 1 out of 3 of those , i.e .
1 of 9 2nd dates , it 's pretty clear that you are currently dating primarily to , as you put it , score , and only secondarily to have a relationship .
Given that criteria , you are , indeed , not very likely to find the kind of girl who would be " the one " to a Slashdot reader until you 're 56 , if ever .
Having a relationship only once every 4.6 years , while dating approximately once a week , again seems to indicate that you 're dating not quite for the purposes of having a relationship.Were you to change your habits , and actually attempt to date for the purpose of having a relationship , you might then revisit the kinds of girls you try to date , and in fact focus more on girls you are likely to actually want to have a relationship with , or who are generally more " relationship material , " as opposed to a quick score , and your chances of having a relationship and/or finding " the one " will increase exponentially .
( For one thing , if you were to have a relationship with 1 out of 3 , and not 1 out of 9 , second dates , instead of scoring with 1 out of 3 , etc. , your chances would rise 3-fold immediately ) .I find it rather incredible how many supposedly " smart " guys have not managed to grasp that if you look for a " relationship " or " the one " in bars or other places where you 're likely to get a quick score , and then trying to find " the one " out of that population , you are also creating bias in your sample , as the kinds of girls you might actually want to have a relationship with might not be hanging out in bars for a quick score in the first place.Consider it a variation of the Heisenberg Uncertainly Principle : the act of choosing where to pick up girls affects the kinds of girls that are available for you to pick up.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For every 3 2nd dates I get I'll score.For every 3 girls I score with I will continue to date.So this means I'll actually have 1 in 243 chance of meeting a girl I like beyond just sex.Interestingly, in your case, you're probably absolutely right that you will be 56 before you find the one, but not quite due to the lack of girls to date.Given that you figure you'll score with 1 of 3 2nd dates, but would only want to have an actual relationship with 1 out of 3 of those, i.e.
1 of 9 2nd dates, it's pretty clear that you are currently dating primarily to, as you put it, score, and only secondarily to have a relationship.
Given that criteria, you are, indeed, not very likely to find the kind of girl who would be "the one" to a Slashdot reader until you're 56, if ever.
Having a relationship only once every 4.6 years, while dating approximately once a week, again seems to indicate that you're dating not quite for the purposes of having a relationship.Were you to change your habits, and actually attempt to date for the purpose of having a relationship, you might then revisit the kinds of girls you try to date, and in fact focus more on girls you are likely to actually want to have a relationship with, or who are generally more "relationship material," as opposed to a quick score, and your chances of having a relationship and/or finding "the one" will increase exponentially.
(For one thing, if you were to have a relationship with 1 out of 3, and not 1 out of 9, second dates, instead of scoring with 1 out of 3, etc., your chances would rise 3-fold immediately).I find it rather incredible how many supposedly "smart" guys have not managed to grasp that if you look for a "relationship" or "the one" in bars or other places where you're likely to get a quick score, and then trying to find "the one" out of that population, you are also creating bias in your sample, as the kinds of girls you might actually want to have a relationship with might not be hanging out in bars for a quick score in the first place.Consider it a variation of the Heisenberg Uncertainly Principle: the act of choosing where to pick up girls affects the kinds of girls that are available for you to pick up...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761514</id>
	<title>Re:Stunt</title>
	<author>smi.james.th</author>
	<datestamp>1263412320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suspect that there's a lot of truth in that...  I've a funny feeling that the percentage of people who have tried calculating the probability of finding a girlfriend is higher among the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. readers than the population in general... we're just that sort.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)
Sounds like an interesting thing to do in one's spare time, if that's the sort of thing you're into, I'm surprised it made it all the way to slashdot's front page though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect that there 's a lot of truth in that... I 've a funny feeling that the percentage of people who have tried calculating the probability of finding a girlfriend is higher among the / .
readers than the population in general... we 're just that sort .
: - ) Sounds like an interesting thing to do in one 's spare time , if that 's the sort of thing you 're into , I 'm surprised it made it all the way to slashdot 's front page though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect that there's a lot of truth in that...  I've a funny feeling that the percentage of people who have tried calculating the probability of finding a girlfriend is higher among the /.
readers than the population in general... we're just that sort.
:-)
Sounds like an interesting thing to do in one's spare time, if that's the sort of thing you're into, I'm surprised it made it all the way to slashdot's front page though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762112</id>
	<title>Re:newsflash....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263465540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's probably not too busy working on stuff like this, his 'paper' is not what you'd say 'higher math', or even sufficiently complex anyway.. A series of multiplications using some statistics numbers pulled out of his ass..errr I meant trustworthy sources.<br>Congrats for the exceptionally sly technique to hit those 'Ohh I'm the one in a million!' lasses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's probably not too busy working on stuff like this , his 'paper ' is not what you 'd say 'higher math ' , or even sufficiently complex anyway.. A series of multiplications using some statistics numbers pulled out of his ass..errr I meant trustworthy sources.Congrats for the exceptionally sly technique to hit those 'Ohh I 'm the one in a million !
' lasses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's probably not too busy working on stuff like this, his 'paper' is not what you'd say 'higher math', or even sufficiently complex anyway.. A series of multiplications using some statistics numbers pulled out of his ass..errr I meant trustworthy sources.Congrats for the exceptionally sly technique to hit those 'Ohh I'm the one in a million!
' lasses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759224</id>
	<title>Wrong country</title>
	<author>horza</author>
	<datestamp>1263390660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem is looking for an English girl. They think they are much better looking than they really are, and expect too much. It would be more interesting if he compared the chances of Eastern Europe, Asia, and Latin America.</p><p>Phillip.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is looking for an English girl .
They think they are much better looking than they really are , and expect too much .
It would be more interesting if he compared the chances of Eastern Europe , Asia , and Latin America.Phillip .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is looking for an English girl.
They think they are much better looking than they really are, and expect too much.
It would be more interesting if he compared the chances of Eastern Europe, Asia, and Latin America.Phillip.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761280</id>
	<title>Re:Stunt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263409320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>s/to attempt/able to/</p><p>fixed that for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>s/to attempt/able to/fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>s/to attempt/able to/fixed that for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759210</id>
	<title>Re:So essentially</title>
	<author>Nursie</author>
	<datestamp>1263390660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah but life's so much more interesting if you meet a few of the less than perfect matches on the way, and your standards might get in the way of getting to know the person that is the best fit.</p><p>Holding out for "the one" is a fools errand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah but life 's so much more interesting if you meet a few of the less than perfect matches on the way , and your standards might get in the way of getting to know the person that is the best fit.Holding out for " the one " is a fools errand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah but life's so much more interesting if you meet a few of the less than perfect matches on the way, and your standards might get in the way of getting to know the person that is the best fit.Holding out for "the one" is a fools errand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760284</id>
	<title>Blaaa too complex....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263399000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1-900-699-6969 see? easy!  If you dial it too often you'll go blind though</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1-900-699-6969 see ?
easy ! If you dial it too often you 'll go blind though</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1-900-699-6969 see?
easy!  If you dial it too often you'll go blind though</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763632</id>
	<title>Guy ripped of NPR's Planet Money podcast</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263482580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Planet Money Podcast on NPR did this same calculation about 6 months ago -- seems this guy ripped them off</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Planet Money Podcast on NPR did this same calculation about 6 months ago -- seems this guy ripped them off</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Planet Money Podcast on NPR did this same calculation about 6 months ago -- seems this guy ripped them off</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763302</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1263480480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd call the European sense of distance "appropriate". We're on a densely-populated continent that isn't very large. Of course we use a different definition of "far" than people on the (by comparison) wastefully unsettled North American continent. Likewise, tell someone in Japan that 86 miles is not "far" and they'll laugh you out of the country.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd call the European sense of distance " appropriate " .
We 're on a densely-populated continent that is n't very large .
Of course we use a different definition of " far " than people on the ( by comparison ) wastefully unsettled North American continent .
Likewise , tell someone in Japan that 86 miles is not " far " and they 'll laugh you out of the country .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd call the European sense of distance "appropriate".
We're on a densely-populated continent that isn't very large.
Of course we use a different definition of "far" than people on the (by comparison) wastefully unsettled North American continent.
Likewise, tell someone in Japan that 86 miles is not "far" and they'll laugh you out of the country.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758998</id>
	<title>Re:So essentially</title>
	<author>Totenglocke</author>
	<datestamp>1263389460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I skimmed the TFA and saw no mention of what his standards are.</p><p>It sounds more like you are a typical nerd and your only standard is "female who will talk to me".  People looking for a real relationship have standards, even if it means that they'll end up alone for life - it's better to be single than to end up marrying the wrong person.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I skimmed the TFA and saw no mention of what his standards are.It sounds more like you are a typical nerd and your only standard is " female who will talk to me " .
People looking for a real relationship have standards , even if it means that they 'll end up alone for life - it 's better to be single than to end up marrying the wrong person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I skimmed the TFA and saw no mention of what his standards are.It sounds more like you are a typical nerd and your only standard is "female who will talk to me".
People looking for a real relationship have standards, even if it means that they'll end up alone for life - it's better to be single than to end up marrying the wrong person.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758802</id>
	<title>Geography fail!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263388620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Warwick is near London? Who wrote this summary? I know Coventry is the city that dare not speak its name, but this is ridiculous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Warwick is near London ?
Who wrote this summary ?
I know Coventry is the city that dare not speak its name , but this is ridiculous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Warwick is near London?
Who wrote this summary?
I know Coventry is the city that dare not speak its name, but this is ridiculous.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30779700</id>
	<title>Been done before</title>
	<author>barberousse</author>
	<datestamp>1263575280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read <a href="http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Why\_I\_Will\_Never\_Have\_a\_Girlfriend" title="nothingisreal.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [nothingisreal.com] a while ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read this [ nothingisreal.com ] a while ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read this [nothingisreal.com] a while ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30764368</id>
	<title>Re:Seinfeld</title>
	<author>asylumx</author>
	<datestamp>1263485700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only for intensive purposes?

(it's "intents and purposes"  But don't worry, even brain surgeons get this one wrong <a href="http://kennyliu.com/brainfart/?p=125" title="kennyliu.com">http://kennyliu.com/brainfart/?p=125</a> [kennyliu.com])</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only for intensive purposes ?
( it 's " intents and purposes " But do n't worry , even brain surgeons get this one wrong http : //kennyliu.com/brainfart/ ? p = 125 [ kennyliu.com ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only for intensive purposes?
(it's "intents and purposes"  But don't worry, even brain surgeons get this one wrong http://kennyliu.com/brainfart/?p=125 [kennyliu.com])</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759686</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>icebraining</author>
	<datestamp>1263393480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Close to zero, I would say, since he now has a girlfriend.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Close to zero , I would say , since he now has a girlfriend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Close to zero, I would say, since he now has a girlfriend.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762246</id>
	<title>Geography</title>
	<author>thetroll123</author>
	<datestamp>1263467580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, if he thinks Warwick is near London, maybe he's literally having trouble *finding* his girlfriend?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if he thinks Warwick is near London , maybe he 's literally having trouble * finding * his girlfriend ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if he thinks Warwick is near London, maybe he's literally having trouble *finding* his girlfriend?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759084</id>
	<title>Re:Stunt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263389880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Common, this is just a stunt in order to get his picture all over the net in order to find a girlfriend !</p></div></blockquote><p>Either way it debunks the Drake Equation in a humorous and easy to understand way. That gives it a plus in my book.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Common , this is just a stunt in order to get his picture all over the net in order to find a girlfriend ! Either way it debunks the Drake Equation in a humorous and easy to understand way .
That gives it a plus in my book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Common, this is just a stunt in order to get his picture all over the net in order to find a girlfriend !Either way it debunks the Drake Equation in a humorous and easy to understand way.
That gives it a plus in my book.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760156</id>
	<title>newsflash....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263397560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... he doesn't have a girlfriend because he's too busy "working" on stuff like this.  get a hobby/join a club that is not male only.  go outside, to club events.  talk to plenty girls (they're people too) there.  you'll pick up sooner or later.
<p>
sitting at home working on drake equations in your spare time, to explain why you don't have a girlfriend is exactly why you don't have one...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... he does n't have a girlfriend because he 's too busy " working " on stuff like this .
get a hobby/join a club that is not male only .
go outside , to club events .
talk to plenty girls ( they 're people too ) there .
you 'll pick up sooner or later .
sitting at home working on drake equations in your spare time , to explain why you do n't have a girlfriend is exactly why you do n't have one.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... he doesn't have a girlfriend because he's too busy "working" on stuff like this.
get a hobby/join a club that is not male only.
go outside, to club events.
talk to plenty girls (they're people too) there.
you'll pick up sooner or later.
sitting at home working on drake equations in your spare time, to explain why you don't have a girlfriend is exactly why you don't have one...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760050</id>
	<title>Big Bang Theory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263396480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow they stole this from Big Bang Theory</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow they stole this from Big Bang Theory</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow they stole this from Big Bang Theory</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30776408</id>
	<title>Re:Big Bang Theory</title>
	<author>SolitaryMan</author>
	<datestamp>1263548340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is a post on a topic dated Dec 1999: <a href="http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Why\_I\_Will\_Never\_Have\_a\_Girlfriend" title="nothingisreal.com">Why I Will Never Have a Girlfriend</a> [nothingisreal.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a post on a topic dated Dec 1999 : Why I Will Never Have a Girlfriend [ nothingisreal.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a post on a topic dated Dec 1999: Why I Will Never Have a Girlfriend [nothingisreal.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759014</id>
	<title>Re:Stunt</title>
	<author>Rei</author>
	<datestamp>1263389580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wouldn't be surprised if the probability of a person finding a girlfriend is inversely correlated to how likely they are to attempt to calculate the probability of finding a girlfriend.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't be surprised if the probability of a person finding a girlfriend is inversely correlated to how likely they are to attempt to calculate the probability of finding a girlfriend .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't be surprised if the probability of a person finding a girlfriend is inversely correlated to how likely they are to attempt to calculate the probability of finding a girlfriend.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760074</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>grepya</author>
	<datestamp>1263396720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> Has FOX News' target audience never heard of any English city besides London?</p></div> </blockquote><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... that's a rhetorical question... right ??</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has FOX News ' target audience never heard of any English city besides London ?
... that 's a rhetorical question... right ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Has FOX News' target audience never heard of any English city besides London?
... that's a rhetorical question... right ?
?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30785290</id>
	<title>The problem is he's American</title>
	<author>ahabswhale</author>
	<datestamp>1263556740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hate to break it to him but British chicks have no interest in American men unless they are black.  I went there with a couple of friends back before we even tarnished our image so badly as a country under Bush and it was nothing doing.  One of my friends was a very attractive guy (of latin decent) who women find easy to talk to and charming and he scores without any hassles in the US but he could barely get a British chick to talk to him.  We did some experiments with going up to women in clubs and just asking them to dance to see how much we got rejected.  It was quite the laugh comparing notes.  In any event, we did notice black Americans didn't have the same problem at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to break it to him but British chicks have no interest in American men unless they are black .
I went there with a couple of friends back before we even tarnished our image so badly as a country under Bush and it was nothing doing .
One of my friends was a very attractive guy ( of latin decent ) who women find easy to talk to and charming and he scores without any hassles in the US but he could barely get a British chick to talk to him .
We did some experiments with going up to women in clubs and just asking them to dance to see how much we got rejected .
It was quite the laugh comparing notes .
In any event , we did notice black Americans did n't have the same problem at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to break it to him but British chicks have no interest in American men unless they are black.
I went there with a couple of friends back before we even tarnished our image so badly as a country under Bush and it was nothing doing.
One of my friends was a very attractive guy (of latin decent) who women find easy to talk to and charming and he scores without any hassles in the US but he could barely get a British chick to talk to him.
We did some experiments with going up to women in clubs and just asking them to dance to see how much we got rejected.
It was quite the laugh comparing notes.
In any event, we did notice black Americans didn't have the same problem at all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758936</id>
	<title>Missing factors.</title>
	<author>Psaakyrn</author>
	<datestamp>1263389220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently he has no attraction value, since that is also one of the keys of finding a potential girlfriend. Anyone with sufficient attraction (for instance, fame, money) would be hard-pressed to escape from potential suitors/stalkers/paparazzi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently he has no attraction value , since that is also one of the keys of finding a potential girlfriend .
Anyone with sufficient attraction ( for instance , fame , money ) would be hard-pressed to escape from potential suitors/stalkers/paparazzi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently he has no attraction value, since that is also one of the keys of finding a potential girlfriend.
Anyone with sufficient attraction (for instance, fame, money) would be hard-pressed to escape from potential suitors/stalkers/paparazzi.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762664</id>
	<title>Re:This man is not studying in London</title>
	<author>delinear</author>
	<datestamp>1263473760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's probably acceptable to have no knowledge of the geography of a country right up to the point where you use it as a term of reference in an article/summary to an article. At that point it might be worth them, y'know, checking some facts (I know, I know, I must be new here).</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably acceptable to have no knowledge of the geography of a country right up to the point where you use it as a term of reference in an article/summary to an article .
At that point it might be worth them , y'know , checking some facts ( I know , I know , I must be new here ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably acceptable to have no knowledge of the geography of a country right up to the point where you use it as a term of reference in an article/summary to an article.
At that point it might be worth them, y'know, checking some facts (I know, I know, I must be new here).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759782</id>
	<title>Funny..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263394380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...I read the PDF and he is trying to find an attractive girl willing to discuss his PhD work with.

Another problem is he didn't include the chances of meeting such girl AND landing a successful approach (even with her finding him attractive).</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I read the PDF and he is trying to find an attractive girl willing to discuss his PhD work with .
Another problem is he did n't include the chances of meeting such girl AND landing a successful approach ( even with her finding him attractive ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I read the PDF and he is trying to find an attractive girl willing to discuss his PhD work with.
Another problem is he didn't include the chances of meeting such girl AND landing a successful approach (even with her finding him attractive).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30767318</id>
	<title>Re:Big Bang Theory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263495240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also in How I Met Your Mother.  Not surprising given that they come from the same place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also in How I Met Your Mother .
Not surprising given that they come from the same place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also in How I Met Your Mother.
Not surprising given that they come from the same place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758748</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30776408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30764244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30765812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30765538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30770388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30764406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30779358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30769438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759658
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30771846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30767318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30764202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30766872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30765362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30764368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759898
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1510229_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760252
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760634
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759120
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759432
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763244
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763594
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759378
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758750
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762336
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759898
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30764368
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759310
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761150
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30765362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760944
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762550
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762552
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763302
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760164
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30779358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759722
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759486
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762906
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761600
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758658
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760046
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758902
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759654
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760108
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30767318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30776408
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30770388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761678
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30769438
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759006
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758708
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758998
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759210
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759116
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759422
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762690
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759826
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761626
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762616
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761106
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760576
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762610
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759242
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30766872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30763446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30762516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30764202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759792
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760384
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758880
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760550
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30764244
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30765538
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30758948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759014
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761280
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761514
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30761974
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759780
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759084
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30759684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30764406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30765812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30771846
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1510229.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1510229.30760624
</commentlist>
</conversation>
