<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_12_1743241</id>
	<title>Man Sues Neighbor For Not Turning Off His Wi-Fi</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1263292020000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Scyth3 writes <i>"A man is <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Santa-Fe-WiFi-Fears-Keep-Getting-Weirder-106308">suing his neighbor for not turning off his cell phone or wireless router</a>. He claims it affects his 'electromagnetic allergies,' and has resorted to being homeless. So, why doesn't he check into a hotel? Because hotels typically have wireless internet for free. I wonder if a tinfoil hat would help his cause?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scyth3 writes " A man is suing his neighbor for not turning off his cell phone or wireless router .
He claims it affects his 'electromagnetic allergies, ' and has resorted to being homeless .
So , why does n't he check into a hotel ?
Because hotels typically have wireless internet for free .
I wonder if a tinfoil hat would help his cause ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scyth3 writes "A man is suing his neighbor for not turning off his cell phone or wireless router.
He claims it affects his 'electromagnetic allergies,' and has resorted to being homeless.
So, why doesn't he check into a hotel?
Because hotels typically have wireless internet for free.
I wonder if a tinfoil hat would help his cause?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744870</id>
	<title>Easy Fix</title>
	<author>Erasmus</author>
	<datestamp>1263301500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>100\% of all Wi-Fi allergies can be cured with one change to your router settings: disable SSID broadcast.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>100 \ % of all Wi-Fi allergies can be cured with one change to your router settings : disable SSID broadcast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>100\% of all Wi-Fi allergies can be cured with one change to your router settings: disable SSID broadcast.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745428</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>pclminion</author>
	<datestamp>1263304500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I seriously hope that lawsuits NEVER work that way. If I legitimately feel wronged, I should have the ability to ask a court to evaluate the evidence and come to a conclusion, without the fear that I'll receive a million dollar smackdown just because I lost by "a smidge." Remember that civil justice is based on "preponderance of evidence," which means that if your side is 49\% convincing and the other side is 51\% convincing, the other side wins.</p><p>Suppose my entire family dies of cancer, and I suspect the cause is groundwater contamination. I sue for, say, $5 million for wrongful death. Does this really mean I need to be prepared to shell out $5 mil if the big corporation wins? That's bullshit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I seriously hope that lawsuits NEVER work that way .
If I legitimately feel wronged , I should have the ability to ask a court to evaluate the evidence and come to a conclusion , without the fear that I 'll receive a million dollar smackdown just because I lost by " a smidge .
" Remember that civil justice is based on " preponderance of evidence , " which means that if your side is 49 \ % convincing and the other side is 51 \ % convincing , the other side wins.Suppose my entire family dies of cancer , and I suspect the cause is groundwater contamination .
I sue for , say , $ 5 million for wrongful death .
Does this really mean I need to be prepared to shell out $ 5 mil if the big corporation wins ?
That 's bullshit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seriously hope that lawsuits NEVER work that way.
If I legitimately feel wronged, I should have the ability to ask a court to evaluate the evidence and come to a conclusion, without the fear that I'll receive a million dollar smackdown just because I lost by "a smidge.
" Remember that civil justice is based on "preponderance of evidence," which means that if your side is 49\% convincing and the other side is 51\% convincing, the other side wins.Suppose my entire family dies of cancer, and I suspect the cause is groundwater contamination.
I sue for, say, $5 million for wrongful death.
Does this really mean I need to be prepared to shell out $5 mil if the big corporation wins?
That's bullshit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743948</id>
	<title>Should we punish people for suing?</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1263296700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>b) If he can't demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance, he owes the plaintiff the same amount he's seeking.</p></div><p>Why the amount he's seeking?</p><p>Wouldn't it be more fair to compensate the defendant for court fees (if any), lawyer salary, lost income/time and compensate the defendant for undue emotional distress?  That is, make repairs exactly for the damage or losses you have caused, no more and no less?</p><p>Or should there be a disincentive towards filing suits?  We all hate litigious bastards, especially the well-funded kind, but disincentives towards filing suits also impacts the little man.</p><p>I'm not saying I know the answer.  I'm just suggesting that we should consider all the options (or at least a handful).</p><p>"An idea is a dangerous thing to have if it's your only idea."  (I can't remember who said it, but I think David Allen quoted that person in Getting Things Done.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>b ) If he ca n't demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance , he owes the plaintiff the same amount he 's seeking.Why the amount he 's seeking ? Would n't it be more fair to compensate the defendant for court fees ( if any ) , lawyer salary , lost income/time and compensate the defendant for undue emotional distress ?
That is , make repairs exactly for the damage or losses you have caused , no more and no less ? Or should there be a disincentive towards filing suits ?
We all hate litigious bastards , especially the well-funded kind , but disincentives towards filing suits also impacts the little man.I 'm not saying I know the answer .
I 'm just suggesting that we should consider all the options ( or at least a handful ) .
" An idea is a dangerous thing to have if it 's your only idea .
" ( I ca n't remember who said it , but I think David Allen quoted that person in Getting Things Done .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>b) If he can't demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance, he owes the plaintiff the same amount he's seeking.Why the amount he's seeking?Wouldn't it be more fair to compensate the defendant for court fees (if any), lawyer salary, lost income/time and compensate the defendant for undue emotional distress?
That is, make repairs exactly for the damage or losses you have caused, no more and no less?Or should there be a disincentive towards filing suits?
We all hate litigious bastards, especially the well-funded kind, but disincentives towards filing suits also impacts the little man.I'm not saying I know the answer.
I'm just suggesting that we should consider all the options (or at least a handful).
"An idea is a dangerous thing to have if it's your only idea.
"  (I can't remember who said it, but I think David Allen quoted that person in Getting Things Done.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747786</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263325200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and now you're gonna be next...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and now you 're gon na be next.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and now you're gonna be next...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30757646</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>2short</author>
	<datestamp>1263383700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I don't see a problem with using 'allergy' as a short-hand for 'negative physiological reaction' in this kind of case."<br><br>I do see a problem with it.  My daughter has serious, actual allergies to certain foods.  I'm sensitive to people using "allergy" to mean various things that it doesn't, because it leads to people not taking allergies seriously;  Which could kill my daughter.<br><br>I agree that the legitimacy of this guys grievance does not depend on whether we incorrectly call it "allergy" or not.  So let's not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I do n't see a problem with using 'allergy ' as a short-hand for 'negative physiological reaction ' in this kind of case .
" I do see a problem with it .
My daughter has serious , actual allergies to certain foods .
I 'm sensitive to people using " allergy " to mean various things that it does n't , because it leads to people not taking allergies seriously ; Which could kill my daughter.I agree that the legitimacy of this guys grievance does not depend on whether we incorrectly call it " allergy " or not .
So let 's not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I don't see a problem with using 'allergy' as a short-hand for 'negative physiological reaction' in this kind of case.
"I do see a problem with it.
My daughter has serious, actual allergies to certain foods.
I'm sensitive to people using "allergy" to mean various things that it doesn't, because it leads to people not taking allergies seriously;  Which could kill my daughter.I agree that the legitimacy of this guys grievance does not depend on whether we incorrectly call it "allergy" or not.
So let's not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744714</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1263300540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's some pretty fine chicken wire.</p><p>Make them sheath it in copper plated tin.  And the slab.  Roof of course.  You can't be too sure.</p><p>Of course, could he get by with just shielding the side of his house facing the neighbor?  I can hardly get WiFi through plaster from my neighbor, and he's not 20 ft away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's some pretty fine chicken wire.Make them sheath it in copper plated tin .
And the slab .
Roof of course .
You ca n't be too sure.Of course , could he get by with just shielding the side of his house facing the neighbor ?
I can hardly get WiFi through plaster from my neighbor , and he 's not 20 ft away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's some pretty fine chicken wire.Make them sheath it in copper plated tin.
And the slab.
Roof of course.
You can't be too sure.Of course, could he get by with just shielding the side of his house facing the neighbor?
I can hardly get WiFi through plaster from my neighbor, and he's not 20 ft away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744650</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263300120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Many allergic reactions (like my own seasonal allergies) don't come and go like a light switch in the presence or absence of the allergen."<br><br>But all allergic reactions (including your seasonal allergies) occur when the body identifies proteins in the allergen as belonging to an attacking organism, and produces antibodies in response.  To put it simply, if ridiculously, there are no proteins in wi-fi signals.  So, even if wifi has any unusual effect on this guy, it isn't an allergy.<br><br>"I could sit in a clean room for 2 or 3 days after getting really spun up from my tree allergies until the symptoms really begin to diminish."<br><br>Of course. Antibodies remain in your blood well after exposure.  But if you sat in a clean room until you had no symptoms, then inhaled a vial I gave you, and waited in the clean room to see what happened, you could tell me if the vial contained tree pollen or just something that smelled like it but wasn't.  Can this guy do something similar with a box that might be a wifi router or not?  I don't know, but a lot of other people have claimed sensitivity to wifi, and none of them have done it, so I'm guessing he can't either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Many allergic reactions ( like my own seasonal allergies ) do n't come and go like a light switch in the presence or absence of the allergen .
" But all allergic reactions ( including your seasonal allergies ) occur when the body identifies proteins in the allergen as belonging to an attacking organism , and produces antibodies in response .
To put it simply , if ridiculously , there are no proteins in wi-fi signals .
So , even if wifi has any unusual effect on this guy , it is n't an allergy .
" I could sit in a clean room for 2 or 3 days after getting really spun up from my tree allergies until the symptoms really begin to diminish .
" Of course .
Antibodies remain in your blood well after exposure .
But if you sat in a clean room until you had no symptoms , then inhaled a vial I gave you , and waited in the clean room to see what happened , you could tell me if the vial contained tree pollen or just something that smelled like it but was n't .
Can this guy do something similar with a box that might be a wifi router or not ?
I do n't know , but a lot of other people have claimed sensitivity to wifi , and none of them have done it , so I 'm guessing he ca n't either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Many allergic reactions (like my own seasonal allergies) don't come and go like a light switch in the presence or absence of the allergen.
"But all allergic reactions (including your seasonal allergies) occur when the body identifies proteins in the allergen as belonging to an attacking organism, and produces antibodies in response.
To put it simply, if ridiculously, there are no proteins in wi-fi signals.
So, even if wifi has any unusual effect on this guy, it isn't an allergy.
"I could sit in a clean room for 2 or 3 days after getting really spun up from my tree allergies until the symptoms really begin to diminish.
"Of course.
Antibodies remain in your blood well after exposure.
But if you sat in a clean room until you had no symptoms, then inhaled a vial I gave you, and waited in the clean room to see what happened, you could tell me if the vial contained tree pollen or just something that smelled like it but wasn't.
Can this guy do something similar with a box that might be a wifi router or not?
I don't know, but a lot of other people have claimed sensitivity to wifi, and none of them have done it, so I'm guessing he can't either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30750322</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>rgviza</author>
	<datestamp>1263397440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you can sue anyone for any reason. some lawyer will probably take the case (and your money)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you can sue anyone for any reason .
some lawyer will probably take the case ( and your money )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you can sue anyone for any reason.
some lawyer will probably take the case (and your money)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744786</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1263300900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Many allergic reactions (like my own seasonal allergies) don't come and go like a light switch in the presence or absence of the allergen.</i></p><p>Right, because your immune system is actually being agitated by the actual allergic response to the actual allergens, and it takes time to come down, plus there are probably still actual allergens like pollen stuck in your sinuses and continuing to irritate you.</p><p>Speaking of light switches, all I can think of is the case of a cell phone company that put up a new tower, and all the <a href="http://angryflower.com/advan.html" title="angryflower.com">advanced</a> [angryflower.com] folks in the neighborhood by it complained that the tower was irritating their EM allergies and giving them headaches and whatnot.</p><p>The company's response to their complaints?  "Gee, we can only imagine how bad it's going to get when we actually turn the tower on!"</p><p>The tower wasn't on.  There was no EM radiation that could have provoked any hypothetical allergy response.  It was all in their extremely advanced heads.</p><p>The ultimate kicker to this story would be if the neighbor had actually turned off their wi-fi weeks ago but told the guy they hadn't just to keep cheesing them off and to show how the "allergy" only exists as long as they <i>think</i> there's evil wi-fi.  Unfortunately I'm sure that's not true, because the neighbor probably finds their wi-fi useful and why the hell would you stop using a useful and harmless tool because the nutjob next door thinks it's bad for them?</p><p>As far as the "weird unexplained things happen!" reasoning...  Yeah, weird things do happen, but it's not like wi-fi itself is some unexplained phenomenon.  We know what the power densities of it are at any given range, and unless you believe in homeopathic E-M radiation, there's no way it's having the effects people claim.   High voltage power lines?  <i>Maybe</i> there's something to that.  Wi-fi?  Yeah fucking right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Many allergic reactions ( like my own seasonal allergies ) do n't come and go like a light switch in the presence or absence of the allergen.Right , because your immune system is actually being agitated by the actual allergic response to the actual allergens , and it takes time to come down , plus there are probably still actual allergens like pollen stuck in your sinuses and continuing to irritate you.Speaking of light switches , all I can think of is the case of a cell phone company that put up a new tower , and all the advanced [ angryflower.com ] folks in the neighborhood by it complained that the tower was irritating their EM allergies and giving them headaches and whatnot.The company 's response to their complaints ?
" Gee , we can only imagine how bad it 's going to get when we actually turn the tower on !
" The tower was n't on .
There was no EM radiation that could have provoked any hypothetical allergy response .
It was all in their extremely advanced heads.The ultimate kicker to this story would be if the neighbor had actually turned off their wi-fi weeks ago but told the guy they had n't just to keep cheesing them off and to show how the " allergy " only exists as long as they think there 's evil wi-fi .
Unfortunately I 'm sure that 's not true , because the neighbor probably finds their wi-fi useful and why the hell would you stop using a useful and harmless tool because the nutjob next door thinks it 's bad for them ? As far as the " weird unexplained things happen !
" reasoning... Yeah , weird things do happen , but it 's not like wi-fi itself is some unexplained phenomenon .
We know what the power densities of it are at any given range , and unless you believe in homeopathic E-M radiation , there 's no way it 's having the effects people claim .
High voltage power lines ?
Maybe there 's something to that .
Wi-fi ? Yeah fucking right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many allergic reactions (like my own seasonal allergies) don't come and go like a light switch in the presence or absence of the allergen.Right, because your immune system is actually being agitated by the actual allergic response to the actual allergens, and it takes time to come down, plus there are probably still actual allergens like pollen stuck in your sinuses and continuing to irritate you.Speaking of light switches, all I can think of is the case of a cell phone company that put up a new tower, and all the advanced [angryflower.com] folks in the neighborhood by it complained that the tower was irritating their EM allergies and giving them headaches and whatnot.The company's response to their complaints?
"Gee, we can only imagine how bad it's going to get when we actually turn the tower on!
"The tower wasn't on.
There was no EM radiation that could have provoked any hypothetical allergy response.
It was all in their extremely advanced heads.The ultimate kicker to this story would be if the neighbor had actually turned off their wi-fi weeks ago but told the guy they hadn't just to keep cheesing them off and to show how the "allergy" only exists as long as they think there's evil wi-fi.
Unfortunately I'm sure that's not true, because the neighbor probably finds their wi-fi useful and why the hell would you stop using a useful and harmless tool because the nutjob next door thinks it's bad for them?As far as the "weird unexplained things happen!
" reasoning...  Yeah, weird things do happen, but it's not like wi-fi itself is some unexplained phenomenon.
We know what the power densities of it are at any given range, and unless you believe in homeopathic E-M radiation, there's no way it's having the effects people claim.
High voltage power lines?
Maybe there's something to that.
Wi-fi?  Yeah fucking right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30749142</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263389280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Can this guy do something similar with a box that might be a wifi router or not?</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, that depends on whether there indeed is a router inside that box or<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... whether it's just a cat (alive or not).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can this guy do something similar with a box that might be a wifi router or not ? Well , that depends on whether there indeed is a router inside that box or ... whether it 's just a cat ( alive or not ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can this guy do something similar with a box that might be a wifi router or not?Well, that depends on whether there indeed is a router inside that box or ... whether it's just a cat (alive or not).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30751056</id>
	<title>Re:I want to sue as well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263400380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wanna sue mine cause he doesn't have his set up <b>right</b>.  I can hook in sometimes, but I get no DNS from him and the signal is so weak, I can't surf anything more than his hard drives.</p><p>That guy needs more <b>porn</b>.  All he has is boring apps like Office 2003, nothing decent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wan na sue mine cause he does n't have his set up right .
I can hook in sometimes , but I get no DNS from him and the signal is so weak , I ca n't surf anything more than his hard drives.That guy needs more porn .
All he has is boring apps like Office 2003 , nothing decent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wanna sue mine cause he doesn't have his set up right.
I can hook in sometimes, but I get no DNS from him and the signal is so weak, I can't surf anything more than his hard drives.That guy needs more porn.
All he has is boring apps like Office 2003, nothing decent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30746070</id>
	<title>Re:He will have a hard time proving his case</title>
	<author>deodiaus2</author>
	<datestamp>1263308580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I bought a house which unbeknownst to me, use to have a cat.  I was highly allergic to the cat dander and told the real estate agent that this was a notious substance.  I was told to paint the house, replace the almost new carpeting, and clean out the ducts.  <br>
Before signing the contract, the lawyer did not send me the form a week prior to the signing, as I had asked explicitly.  During the signing, the lawyer and real estate agent were talking like a bunch of women at a tea party, except that I was paying $750 for the deal.  I complained, but the lawyer told me that I did not have the time to read the whole contract and that she would represent my interests.  In case she mucked up, I also had to get mortgage insurance.  Worse yet, the contract that I signed had a clause stating that I could not cancel the sale because of allergies to cat dander.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I bought a house which unbeknownst to me , use to have a cat .
I was highly allergic to the cat dander and told the real estate agent that this was a notious substance .
I was told to paint the house , replace the almost new carpeting , and clean out the ducts .
Before signing the contract , the lawyer did not send me the form a week prior to the signing , as I had asked explicitly .
During the signing , the lawyer and real estate agent were talking like a bunch of women at a tea party , except that I was paying $ 750 for the deal .
I complained , but the lawyer told me that I did not have the time to read the whole contract and that she would represent my interests .
In case she mucked up , I also had to get mortgage insurance .
Worse yet , the contract that I signed had a clause stating that I could not cancel the sale because of allergies to cat dander .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bought a house which unbeknownst to me, use to have a cat.
I was highly allergic to the cat dander and told the real estate agent that this was a notious substance.
I was told to paint the house, replace the almost new carpeting, and clean out the ducts.
Before signing the contract, the lawyer did not send me the form a week prior to the signing, as I had asked explicitly.
During the signing, the lawyer and real estate agent were talking like a bunch of women at a tea party, except that I was paying $750 for the deal.
I complained, but the lawyer told me that I did not have the time to read the whole contract and that she would represent my interests.
In case she mucked up, I also had to get mortgage insurance.
Worse yet, the contract that I signed had a clause stating that I could not cancel the sale because of allergies to cat dander.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30753168</id>
	<title>Re:Not impossible...</title>
	<author>omnichad</author>
	<datestamp>1263408300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Inverse square law.  A neighbor next door has exponentially less powerful waves hitting him.  I've actually gotten "burned" by a cell phone antenna touching my neck.  Got hot enough to hurt anyway.  But at those distances, at those power levels, it would be ridiculous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Inverse square law .
A neighbor next door has exponentially less powerful waves hitting him .
I 've actually gotten " burned " by a cell phone antenna touching my neck .
Got hot enough to hurt anyway .
But at those distances , at those power levels , it would be ridiculous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Inverse square law.
A neighbor next door has exponentially less powerful waves hitting him.
I've actually gotten "burned" by a cell phone antenna touching my neck.
Got hot enough to hurt anyway.
But at those distances, at those power levels, it would be ridiculous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744606</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263300000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have an alergy to sunlight, usually when emerging from a dark room into bright sunlight my eyes water, my nose goes ichy and I sneeze sometimes. It lasts a few minutes until my eyes adjust. I always thought this was a natural normal reaction and thought nothing of it, indeed it makes sense that your eyes water in bright light. But no, when I mentioned to a professional, apparently it's common but not normal and has been diagnosed as an alergy.
<br> <br>
Agreeing with the above post, sometimes it just doesn't happen, or it lasts longer, or it doesn't clear up for hours, its variable.
<br> <br>
Indeed there are people who can die from an alergic reaction to UV light.
<br> <br>
<b>People can be genuinely alergic to some really strange things. So how is it then that it is so implausible that someone might be alergic to wi-fi?</b> Then human immune system is not only strange but unstable <br> <br> The only remaining implausible thing IMHO is the distance.
<br> <br>
If I wrap your hand around a USB wi-fi dongle, maybe you can feel the tingling from the EM field or static electricity or something, especially if it's a poor design.<br> <br>
Problem is, if you are 50 feet away, the energy level is suddenly about 500,000 times lower, that's totally ignoring any walls in the way. For all practical purposes the signal is lost in the seething bath of EM raditation all around us, it cannot have any effect on you, period.
<br> <br>
I heard it said that a lifetime of being in the same house as a Wi-Fi router is equivelent of holding a cellhpone against your head for 1 hour. So far, in a world with billions of cellphones used for countless hours of talktime held to the side of the head, there isn't a worldwide pandemic of brain tumours. So if there is an effect it is extremely small to not show up.
<br> <br>
Wi-fi danger debunked. No need to thank me.
<br> <br>
Yet it's plausible that people are <b>alergic</b> to EMF, it's certainly established that people can be alergic to parts of the EM spectrum.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an alergy to sunlight , usually when emerging from a dark room into bright sunlight my eyes water , my nose goes ichy and I sneeze sometimes .
It lasts a few minutes until my eyes adjust .
I always thought this was a natural normal reaction and thought nothing of it , indeed it makes sense that your eyes water in bright light .
But no , when I mentioned to a professional , apparently it 's common but not normal and has been diagnosed as an alergy .
Agreeing with the above post , sometimes it just does n't happen , or it lasts longer , or it does n't clear up for hours , its variable .
Indeed there are people who can die from an alergic reaction to UV light .
People can be genuinely alergic to some really strange things .
So how is it then that it is so implausible that someone might be alergic to wi-fi ?
Then human immune system is not only strange but unstable The only remaining implausible thing IMHO is the distance .
If I wrap your hand around a USB wi-fi dongle , maybe you can feel the tingling from the EM field or static electricity or something , especially if it 's a poor design .
Problem is , if you are 50 feet away , the energy level is suddenly about 500,000 times lower , that 's totally ignoring any walls in the way .
For all practical purposes the signal is lost in the seething bath of EM raditation all around us , it can not have any effect on you , period .
I heard it said that a lifetime of being in the same house as a Wi-Fi router is equivelent of holding a cellhpone against your head for 1 hour .
So far , in a world with billions of cellphones used for countless hours of talktime held to the side of the head , there is n't a worldwide pandemic of brain tumours .
So if there is an effect it is extremely small to not show up .
Wi-fi danger debunked .
No need to thank me .
Yet it 's plausible that people are alergic to EMF , it 's certainly established that people can be alergic to parts of the EM spectrum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an alergy to sunlight, usually when emerging from a dark room into bright sunlight my eyes water, my nose goes ichy and I sneeze sometimes.
It lasts a few minutes until my eyes adjust.
I always thought this was a natural normal reaction and thought nothing of it, indeed it makes sense that your eyes water in bright light.
But no, when I mentioned to a professional, apparently it's common but not normal and has been diagnosed as an alergy.
Agreeing with the above post, sometimes it just doesn't happen, or it lasts longer, or it doesn't clear up for hours, its variable.
Indeed there are people who can die from an alergic reaction to UV light.
People can be genuinely alergic to some really strange things.
So how is it then that it is so implausible that someone might be alergic to wi-fi?
Then human immune system is not only strange but unstable   The only remaining implausible thing IMHO is the distance.
If I wrap your hand around a USB wi-fi dongle, maybe you can feel the tingling from the EM field or static electricity or something, especially if it's a poor design.
Problem is, if you are 50 feet away, the energy level is suddenly about 500,000 times lower, that's totally ignoring any walls in the way.
For all practical purposes the signal is lost in the seething bath of EM raditation all around us, it cannot have any effect on you, period.
I heard it said that a lifetime of being in the same house as a Wi-Fi router is equivelent of holding a cellhpone against your head for 1 hour.
So far, in a world with billions of cellphones used for countless hours of talktime held to the side of the head, there isn't a worldwide pandemic of brain tumours.
So if there is an effect it is extremely small to not show up.
Wi-fi danger debunked.
No need to thank me.
Yet it's plausible that people are alergic to EMF, it's certainly established that people can be alergic to parts of the EM spectrum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745214</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>SCPRedMage</author>
	<datestamp>1263303240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The fact that it's psychological rather than physical doesn't make it any less of a problem.</p></div><p>But it DOES make it a problem that was neither caused by, nor can be relieved by, his neighbor's actions.  Which makes it his own damn problem.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact that it 's psychological rather than physical does n't make it any less of a problem.But it DOES make it a problem that was neither caused by , nor can be relieved by , his neighbor 's actions .
Which makes it his own damn problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact that it's psychological rather than physical doesn't make it any less of a problem.But it DOES make it a problem that was neither caused by, nor can be relieved by, his neighbor's actions.
Which makes it his own damn problem.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744220</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>91degrees</author>
	<datestamp>1263297960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>He's not really abusing torts though.  At least not deliberately.  He does suffer from a genuine medical condition.  The fact that it's psychological rather than physical doesn't make it any less of a problem.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's not really abusing torts though .
At least not deliberately .
He does suffer from a genuine medical condition .
The fact that it 's psychological rather than physical does n't make it any less of a problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's not really abusing torts though.
At least not deliberately.
He does suffer from a genuine medical condition.
The fact that it's psychological rather than physical doesn't make it any less of a problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30746286</id>
	<title>Re:Microwave Ovens? Cordless Phones?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263310620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even the human body emits electromagnetic radiation. How can he be so certain the "allergic reaction" is caused by external sources?</p><p>Then there's radio waves, television station signals, cell phone signals, remote controlled toys, cars, rocks, bioluminescent fish... He's fscked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even the human body emits electromagnetic radiation .
How can he be so certain the " allergic reaction " is caused by external sources ? Then there 's radio waves , television station signals , cell phone signals , remote controlled toys , cars , rocks , bioluminescent fish... He 's fscked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even the human body emits electromagnetic radiation.
How can he be so certain the "allergic reaction" is caused by external sources?Then there's radio waves, television station signals, cell phone signals, remote controlled toys, cars, rocks, bioluminescent fish... He's fscked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747306</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1263319800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FWIW, an immune reaction is a form of physiological reaction, just like a knee-jerk from a rubber mallet to the nerve behind the patella is a form of physiological reaction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FWIW , an immune reaction is a form of physiological reaction , just like a knee-jerk from a rubber mallet to the nerve behind the patella is a form of physiological reaction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FWIW, an immune reaction is a form of physiological reaction, just like a knee-jerk from a rubber mallet to the nerve behind the patella is a form of physiological reaction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745726</id>
	<title>Allergy shouldn't be grounds for suing</title>
	<author>ningaui</author>
	<datestamp>1263306180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am allergic to several types of pollen. I am also allergic to some perfumes, and to cigarette smoke. I don't think I should be allowed to sue anyone for growing grass or crops, or wearing perfume.

Even if he could prove he is allergic to the claimed types of EM radiation, he shouldn't be allowed to sue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am allergic to several types of pollen .
I am also allergic to some perfumes , and to cigarette smoke .
I do n't think I should be allowed to sue anyone for growing grass or crops , or wearing perfume .
Even if he could prove he is allergic to the claimed types of EM radiation , he should n't be allowed to sue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am allergic to several types of pollen.
I am also allergic to some perfumes, and to cigarette smoke.
I don't think I should be allowed to sue anyone for growing grass or crops, or wearing perfume.
Even if he could prove he is allergic to the claimed types of EM radiation, he shouldn't be allowed to sue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745630</id>
	<title>Re:Simple test...</title>
	<author>Grishnakh</author>
	<datestamp>1263305640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>And if this guy really does have that severe a reaction to all technology, then Darwin says he should go stuff. Let him join an Amish community and live the rest of his life in peace. He has no right to shut down every invention of the past hundred years everywhere he goes simply because he's a genetic disaster.</i></p><p>Actually, the Amish use electricity.  It's all battery- or solar-powered, but they have it.  They don't really use it at home, but for their businesses they do.  Amish aren't completely anti-technology, they're just really big on isolationism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And if this guy really does have that severe a reaction to all technology , then Darwin says he should go stuff .
Let him join an Amish community and live the rest of his life in peace .
He has no right to shut down every invention of the past hundred years everywhere he goes simply because he 's a genetic disaster.Actually , the Amish use electricity .
It 's all battery- or solar-powered , but they have it .
They do n't really use it at home , but for their businesses they do .
Amish are n't completely anti-technology , they 're just really big on isolationism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if this guy really does have that severe a reaction to all technology, then Darwin says he should go stuff.
Let him join an Amish community and live the rest of his life in peace.
He has no right to shut down every invention of the past hundred years everywhere he goes simply because he's a genetic disaster.Actually, the Amish use electricity.
It's all battery- or solar-powered, but they have it.
They don't really use it at home, but for their businesses they do.
Amish aren't completely anti-technology, they're just really big on isolationism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30756426</id>
	<title>Re:Simple test...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263378060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have known the man (Arthur) for about 3 years.  He is not a fake.  Just a few nights ago I was sitting next to him at a public meeting on whether to allow many more antennas in the city.  We were chatting and suddenly he says "what is that"?  covers his ears, and lowers his head.  I didn't feel or hear anything.  One second later a woman sitting about 8 feet in front of us gets up and leaves abruptly.  I saw her pull out her blackberry.  Arthur didn't see it and only when she came back in holding it did he realize her blackberry caused it.  I spoke to a former cell company engineer who told me that the handshake protocol at the start of a call is when the phone emits the most microwaves.  He recommended never putting the phone to your head after dialing a call until the call has gone through.  I also know an older man who had a seizure, and while on the medication found he could "hear" (google Frey effect) a cell or cordless phone call before the phone would ring.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have known the man ( Arthur ) for about 3 years .
He is not a fake .
Just a few nights ago I was sitting next to him at a public meeting on whether to allow many more antennas in the city .
We were chatting and suddenly he says " what is that " ?
covers his ears , and lowers his head .
I did n't feel or hear anything .
One second later a woman sitting about 8 feet in front of us gets up and leaves abruptly .
I saw her pull out her blackberry .
Arthur did n't see it and only when she came back in holding it did he realize her blackberry caused it .
I spoke to a former cell company engineer who told me that the handshake protocol at the start of a call is when the phone emits the most microwaves .
He recommended never putting the phone to your head after dialing a call until the call has gone through .
I also know an older man who had a seizure , and while on the medication found he could " hear " ( google Frey effect ) a cell or cordless phone call before the phone would ring .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have known the man (Arthur) for about 3 years.
He is not a fake.
Just a few nights ago I was sitting next to him at a public meeting on whether to allow many more antennas in the city.
We were chatting and suddenly he says "what is that"?
covers his ears, and lowers his head.
I didn't feel or hear anything.
One second later a woman sitting about 8 feet in front of us gets up and leaves abruptly.
I saw her pull out her blackberry.
Arthur didn't see it and only when she came back in holding it did he realize her blackberry caused it.
I spoke to a former cell company engineer who told me that the handshake protocol at the start of a call is when the phone emits the most microwaves.
He recommended never putting the phone to your head after dialing a call until the call has gone through.
I also know an older man who had a seizure, and while on the medication found he could "hear" (google Frey effect) a cell or cordless phone call before the phone would ring.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744478</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>Chr0me</author>
	<datestamp>1263299220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>All he would need to do is cover his house with chicken wire, paint and stucco</p> </div><p>That's crazy talk. A building covered in chicken wire, stucco, and paint would never fit in with the rest of the houses in Santa Fe.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All he would need to do is cover his house with chicken wire , paint and stucco That 's crazy talk .
A building covered in chicken wire , stucco , and paint would never fit in with the rest of the houses in Santa Fe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All he would need to do is cover his house with chicken wire, paint and stucco That's crazy talk.
A building covered in chicken wire, stucco, and paint would never fit in with the rest of the houses in Santa Fe.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745974</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>niiler</author>
	<datestamp>1263307920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interestingly, the latest research shows that people who use cell phones more are less likely to suffer from <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100107/hl\_nm/us\_alzheimers\_cellphones" title="yahoo.com">Altzheimer's disease</a> [yahoo.com].  It sounds like this is a non-issue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interestingly , the latest research shows that people who use cell phones more are less likely to suffer from Altzheimer 's disease [ yahoo.com ] .
It sounds like this is a non-issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interestingly, the latest research shows that people who use cell phones more are less likely to suffer from Altzheimer's disease [yahoo.com].
It sounds like this is a non-issue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768</id>
	<title>litmus test</title>
	<author>MaXintosh</author>
	<datestamp>1263295920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a way to be fair to this guy, as well as punish people abusing torts. It's very simple:<br>a) If he can demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions, they'll consider his case.<br>b) If he can't demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance, he owes the plaintiff the same amount he's seeking.<br> <br>I call this the `put up or shut up` principle. Although, it might be more widely known as the `Let's not be flaming idiots` principle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a way to be fair to this guy , as well as punish people abusing torts .
It 's very simple : a ) If he can demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions , they 'll consider his case.b ) If he ca n't demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance , he owes the plaintiff the same amount he 's seeking .
I call this the ` put up or shut up ` principle .
Although , it might be more widely known as the ` Let 's not be flaming idiots ` principle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a way to be fair to this guy, as well as punish people abusing torts.
It's very simple:a) If he can demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions, they'll consider his case.b) If he can't demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance, he owes the plaintiff the same amount he's seeking.
I call this the `put up or shut up` principle.
Although, it might be more widely known as the `Let's not be flaming idiots` principle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30770298</id>
	<title>Test Him by WAR driving</title>
	<author>minstrelmike</author>
	<datestamp>1263462000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He could be tested easily enough for his ability to detect wifi networks merely by war driving.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He could be tested easily enough for his ability to detect wifi networks merely by war driving .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He could be tested easily enough for his ability to detect wifi networks merely by war driving.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743772</id>
	<title>Get off my Astral Plane!</title>
	<author>kclittle</author>
	<datestamp>1263295980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>And stop eating meat OR veggies -- I can hear the carrots scream!</htmltext>
<tokenext>And stop eating meat OR veggies -- I can hear the carrots scream !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And stop eating meat OR veggies -- I can hear the carrots scream!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744624</id>
	<title>Got SSID?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263300060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does this Luddite even now the SSID is broadcasting? I mean I would assume he has some kind of wireless sniffer which is working on the same band. Doesn't that undermine his argument right there?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does this Luddite even now the SSID is broadcasting ?
I mean I would assume he has some kind of wireless sniffer which is working on the same band .
Does n't that undermine his argument right there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does this Luddite even now the SSID is broadcasting?
I mean I would assume he has some kind of wireless sniffer which is working on the same band.
Doesn't that undermine his argument right there?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30758734</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>thtrgremlin</author>
	<datestamp>1263388320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>People living under power lines are more likely to get cancer. True, but people in poverty are more likely to get cancer too, and the higher chance of cancer for living under power lines is equal to the higher chance that you are poor.<br> <br>

So technically it would be more appropriate to say that people that are at higher risk for cancer are more likely to live under power lines. If I remember correctly, there is a similar risk for people that live near trains. Another funny one is that it has been found that if you are uber rich you are at higher risk for cancer. Reason is that people only have cancer if they are diagnosed with it, at least when it comer to statistics. The real correlation was that the better your health care, the more likely it is that you will get diagnosed rather than just "be sick" or "die of old age".</htmltext>
<tokenext>People living under power lines are more likely to get cancer .
True , but people in poverty are more likely to get cancer too , and the higher chance of cancer for living under power lines is equal to the higher chance that you are poor .
So technically it would be more appropriate to say that people that are at higher risk for cancer are more likely to live under power lines .
If I remember correctly , there is a similar risk for people that live near trains .
Another funny one is that it has been found that if you are uber rich you are at higher risk for cancer .
Reason is that people only have cancer if they are diagnosed with it , at least when it comer to statistics .
The real correlation was that the better your health care , the more likely it is that you will get diagnosed rather than just " be sick " or " die of old age " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People living under power lines are more likely to get cancer.
True, but people in poverty are more likely to get cancer too, and the higher chance of cancer for living under power lines is equal to the higher chance that you are poor.
So technically it would be more appropriate to say that people that are at higher risk for cancer are more likely to live under power lines.
If I remember correctly, there is a similar risk for people that live near trains.
Another funny one is that it has been found that if you are uber rich you are at higher risk for cancer.
Reason is that people only have cancer if they are diagnosed with it, at least when it comer to statistics.
The real correlation was that the better your health care, the more likely it is that you will get diagnosed rather than just "be sick" or "die of old age".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743744</id>
	<title>These stories..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263295860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These stories come up once every couple of months and are always bullshit</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These stories come up once every couple of months and are always bullshit</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These stories come up once every couple of months and are always bullshit</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30746730</id>
	<title>A new fashion..</title>
	<author>Asadullah Ahmad</author>
	<datestamp>1263314400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems like after that musician wi-fi  incident, he is just trying his luck.</p><p>If the suing culture continues in America like this, it won't be long before someone sues their parents for not being 6-feet tall.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems like after that musician wi-fi incident , he is just trying his luck.If the suing culture continues in America like this , it wo n't be long before someone sues their parents for not being 6-feet tall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems like after that musician wi-fi  incident, he is just trying his luck.If the suing culture continues in America like this, it won't be long before someone sues their parents for not being 6-feet tall.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744760</id>
	<title>Psychology rather than Electromagnetics</title>
	<author>loose electron</author>
	<datestamp>1263300780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Its a little scary but I dated a lady for a while who thought the government was using here for non lethal weapons testing, by hitting her with EM waves.</p><p>Pity... Good looking with a very nice body... Such a waste...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia [ wikipedia.org ] Its a little scary but I dated a lady for a while who thought the government was using here for non lethal weapons testing , by hitting her with EM waves.Pity... Good looking with a very nice body... Such a waste.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia [wikipedia.org]Its a little scary but I dated a lady for a while who thought the government was using here for non lethal weapons testing, by hitting her with EM waves.Pity... Good looking with a very nice body... Such a waste...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30746964</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>Psaakyrn</author>
	<datestamp>1263316440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Disagree.</p><p>Let's say it's radiation exposure instead.</p><p>a) If you can demonstrate your ability to detect low level radioactive contamination under reasonable experimental conditions, they'll consider your case.<br>b) If you can't demonstrate you ability to detect low level radioactive contamination under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance, you owe the plaintiff the same amount you are seeking.</p><p>This is assuming you don't use any external devices naturally, since I'm fairly certain anyone can detect electromagnetic fields with external devices.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Disagree.Let 's say it 's radiation exposure instead.a ) If you can demonstrate your ability to detect low level radioactive contamination under reasonable experimental conditions , they 'll consider your case.b ) If you ca n't demonstrate you ability to detect low level radioactive contamination under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance , you owe the plaintiff the same amount you are seeking.This is assuming you do n't use any external devices naturally , since I 'm fairly certain anyone can detect electromagnetic fields with external devices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disagree.Let's say it's radiation exposure instead.a) If you can demonstrate your ability to detect low level radioactive contamination under reasonable experimental conditions, they'll consider your case.b) If you can't demonstrate you ability to detect low level radioactive contamination under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance, you owe the plaintiff the same amount you are seeking.This is assuming you don't use any external devices naturally, since I'm fairly certain anyone can detect electromagnetic fields with external devices.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744628</id>
	<title>Re:Simple test...</title>
	<author>Kenoli</author>
	<datestamp>1263300060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No need for a test.<br>
Even if his magical allergies really do exist his demands are still bogus.<br>
Electromagnetic radiation won't cease to exist just because some crazy guy thinks it might be bad for him.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No need for a test .
Even if his magical allergies really do exist his demands are still bogus .
Electromagnetic radiation wo n't cease to exist just because some crazy guy thinks it might be bad for him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No need for a test.
Even if his magical allergies really do exist his demands are still bogus.
Electromagnetic radiation won't cease to exist just because some crazy guy thinks it might be bad for him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745732</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Fulcrum of Evil</author>
	<datestamp>1263306240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do you sue an island?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you sue an island ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you sue an island?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744604</id>
	<title>Re:Microwave Ovens? Cordless Phones?</title>
	<author>gknoy</author>
	<datestamp>1263299940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering that he's already homeless, saying that he "should be sued into bankruptcy" sounds overly harsh to me. I'd not wish that on anyone aside from villainous people who area blight on society.  This guy's just a nutjob who needs his case thrown out of court.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering that he 's already homeless , saying that he " should be sued into bankruptcy " sounds overly harsh to me .
I 'd not wish that on anyone aside from villainous people who area blight on society .
This guy 's just a nutjob who needs his case thrown out of court .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering that he's already homeless, saying that he "should be sued into bankruptcy" sounds overly harsh to me.
I'd not wish that on anyone aside from villainous people who area blight on society.
This guy's just a nutjob who needs his case thrown out of court.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745148</id>
	<title>Subpoena His Mortage Company</title>
	<author>Miseph</author>
	<datestamp>1263302940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The defense attorney should be asking whoever holds/held this guy's mortgage as to the status of that account. The summary states he has resorted to homelessness, so I can't help but wonder if this really was a voluntary response to Wi-Fi.</p><p>Also, perhaps a reasonable and appropriate resolution would be for the plaintiff to sell his urban home and move into the ass-end of nowhere. Surely his neighbor cannot be the only guy in Santa Fe with a wireless router, and probably isn't even the only neighbor with one. Not to mention that I'm willing to bet cell phones work just fine there, and they work in similar ways on similar frequencies. I think his only effective recourse is to remove himself from anywhere that has an abundance of such radiation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The defense attorney should be asking whoever holds/held this guy 's mortgage as to the status of that account .
The summary states he has resorted to homelessness , so I ca n't help but wonder if this really was a voluntary response to Wi-Fi.Also , perhaps a reasonable and appropriate resolution would be for the plaintiff to sell his urban home and move into the ass-end of nowhere .
Surely his neighbor can not be the only guy in Santa Fe with a wireless router , and probably is n't even the only neighbor with one .
Not to mention that I 'm willing to bet cell phones work just fine there , and they work in similar ways on similar frequencies .
I think his only effective recourse is to remove himself from anywhere that has an abundance of such radiation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The defense attorney should be asking whoever holds/held this guy's mortgage as to the status of that account.
The summary states he has resorted to homelessness, so I can't help but wonder if this really was a voluntary response to Wi-Fi.Also, perhaps a reasonable and appropriate resolution would be for the plaintiff to sell his urban home and move into the ass-end of nowhere.
Surely his neighbor cannot be the only guy in Santa Fe with a wireless router, and probably isn't even the only neighbor with one.
Not to mention that I'm willing to bet cell phones work just fine there, and they work in similar ways on similar frequencies.
I think his only effective recourse is to remove himself from anywhere that has an abundance of such radiation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743924</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>snowgirl</author>
	<datestamp>1263296640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I have a way to be fair to this guy, as well as punish people abusing torts. It's very simple:<br>a) If he can demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions, they'll consider his case.<br>b) If he can't demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance, he owes the plaintiff the same amount he's seeking.</p><p>I call this the `put up or shut up` principle. Although, it might be more widely known as the `Let's not be flaming idiots` principle.</p></div><p>There's a few issues here.  First, the man may just be suing for equity, as in suing to obtain an order of restraint requiring his neighbor to disable his EM emissions.  As well, there are situations where a court considering some complex issue where an order of restraint may result in unfair damages against the other party to have the initiating party place a bond against such damages.</p><p>This guy faces an uphill battle, since he has to prove to a better than 50\% confidence that his neighbor's EM emissions are causing him injury.  That's the important thing, the law does not require him to prove 100\%, or to a reasonable scientific certainty that his claims are valid.  He has to prove to either a judge or a jury that it's more likely that his claims are true than his opponent.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a way to be fair to this guy , as well as punish people abusing torts .
It 's very simple : a ) If he can demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions , they 'll consider his case.b ) If he ca n't demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance , he owes the plaintiff the same amount he 's seeking.I call this the ` put up or shut up ` principle .
Although , it might be more widely known as the ` Let 's not be flaming idiots ` principle.There 's a few issues here .
First , the man may just be suing for equity , as in suing to obtain an order of restraint requiring his neighbor to disable his EM emissions .
As well , there are situations where a court considering some complex issue where an order of restraint may result in unfair damages against the other party to have the initiating party place a bond against such damages.This guy faces an uphill battle , since he has to prove to a better than 50 \ % confidence that his neighbor 's EM emissions are causing him injury .
That 's the important thing , the law does not require him to prove 100 \ % , or to a reasonable scientific certainty that his claims are valid .
He has to prove to either a judge or a jury that it 's more likely that his claims are true than his opponent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a way to be fair to this guy, as well as punish people abusing torts.
It's very simple:a) If he can demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions, they'll consider his case.b) If he can't demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance, he owes the plaintiff the same amount he's seeking.I call this the `put up or shut up` principle.
Although, it might be more widely known as the `Let's not be flaming idiots` principle.There's a few issues here.
First, the man may just be suing for equity, as in suing to obtain an order of restraint requiring his neighbor to disable his EM emissions.
As well, there are situations where a court considering some complex issue where an order of restraint may result in unfair damages against the other party to have the initiating party place a bond against such damages.This guy faces an uphill battle, since he has to prove to a better than 50\% confidence that his neighbor's EM emissions are causing him injury.
That's the important thing, the law does not require him to prove 100\%, or to a reasonable scientific certainty that his claims are valid.
He has to prove to either a judge or a jury that it's more likely that his claims are true than his opponent.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744210</id>
	<title>Re:Should we punish people for suing?</title>
	<author>snowgirl</author>
	<datestamp>1263297960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>b) If he can't demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance, he owes the plaintiff the same amount he's seeking.</p></div><p>Why the amount he's seeking?</p><p>Wouldn't it be more fair to compensate the defendant for court fees (if any), lawyer salary, lost income/time and compensate the defendant for undue emotional distress?  That is, make repairs exactly for the damage or losses you have caused, no more and no less?</p><p>Or should there be a disincentive towards filing suits?  We all hate litigious bastards, especially the well-funded kind, but disincentives towards filing suits also impacts the little man.</p><p>I'm not saying I know the answer.  I'm just suggesting that we should consider all the options (or at least a handful).</p><p>"An idea is a dangerous thing to have if it's your only idea."  (I can't remember who said it, but I think David Allen quoted that person in Getting Things Done.)</p></div><p>If a judge dismisses your case because it's frivolous, he will typically do two things, dismiss the case with prejudice (meaning the plaintiff/petitioner cannot ever bring the same facts into court again) and require the plaintiff/petitioner to pay reasonable legal fees incurred by the defendant.</p><p>The problem is that a lot of cases that people <i>think</i> are frivolous are based upon a lot of facts, where they do create a question of law.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>b ) If he ca n't demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance , he owes the plaintiff the same amount he 's seeking.Why the amount he 's seeking ? Would n't it be more fair to compensate the defendant for court fees ( if any ) , lawyer salary , lost income/time and compensate the defendant for undue emotional distress ?
That is , make repairs exactly for the damage or losses you have caused , no more and no less ? Or should there be a disincentive towards filing suits ?
We all hate litigious bastards , especially the well-funded kind , but disincentives towards filing suits also impacts the little man.I 'm not saying I know the answer .
I 'm just suggesting that we should consider all the options ( or at least a handful ) .
" An idea is a dangerous thing to have if it 's your only idea .
" ( I ca n't remember who said it , but I think David Allen quoted that person in Getting Things Done .
) If a judge dismisses your case because it 's frivolous , he will typically do two things , dismiss the case with prejudice ( meaning the plaintiff/petitioner can not ever bring the same facts into court again ) and require the plaintiff/petitioner to pay reasonable legal fees incurred by the defendant.The problem is that a lot of cases that people think are frivolous are based upon a lot of facts , where they do create a question of law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>b) If he can't demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance, he owes the plaintiff the same amount he's seeking.Why the amount he's seeking?Wouldn't it be more fair to compensate the defendant for court fees (if any), lawyer salary, lost income/time and compensate the defendant for undue emotional distress?
That is, make repairs exactly for the damage or losses you have caused, no more and no less?Or should there be a disincentive towards filing suits?
We all hate litigious bastards, especially the well-funded kind, but disincentives towards filing suits also impacts the little man.I'm not saying I know the answer.
I'm just suggesting that we should consider all the options (or at least a handful).
"An idea is a dangerous thing to have if it's your only idea.
"  (I can't remember who said it, but I think David Allen quoted that person in Getting Things Done.
)If a judge dismisses your case because it's frivolous, he will typically do two things, dismiss the case with prejudice (meaning the plaintiff/petitioner cannot ever bring the same facts into court again) and require the plaintiff/petitioner to pay reasonable legal fees incurred by the defendant.The problem is that a lot of cases that people think are frivolous are based upon a lot of facts, where they do create a question of law.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745394</id>
	<title>what his neighbor could do....</title>
	<author>SethJohnson</author>
	<datestamp>1263304260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This guy is no different than the chemical sensitivity people who try to manipulate those around them because they have control issues. They want everyone to jump through these hoops, which gives them a positive feeling of having controlled those around them.<br> <br>The neighbor could have simply changed his wifi to not broadcast the network name. When the annoying guy fired up his laptop to see if the neighbor had fulfilled his request to shut off the wireless, it would appear as though it is shut off. Then after a year, he could ask the annoying guy if shutting off the wifi helped his allergy. When the guy said, "Yes." Then the neighbor could explain that he had been running the wifi the whole time, but without broadcasting the network name.<br> <br>Seth</htmltext>
<tokenext>This guy is no different than the chemical sensitivity people who try to manipulate those around them because they have control issues .
They want everyone to jump through these hoops , which gives them a positive feeling of having controlled those around them .
The neighbor could have simply changed his wifi to not broadcast the network name .
When the annoying guy fired up his laptop to see if the neighbor had fulfilled his request to shut off the wireless , it would appear as though it is shut off .
Then after a year , he could ask the annoying guy if shutting off the wifi helped his allergy .
When the guy said , " Yes .
" Then the neighbor could explain that he had been running the wifi the whole time , but without broadcasting the network name .
Seth</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This guy is no different than the chemical sensitivity people who try to manipulate those around them because they have control issues.
They want everyone to jump through these hoops, which gives them a positive feeling of having controlled those around them.
The neighbor could have simply changed his wifi to not broadcast the network name.
When the annoying guy fired up his laptop to see if the neighbor had fulfilled his request to shut off the wireless, it would appear as though it is shut off.
Then after a year, he could ask the annoying guy if shutting off the wifi helped his allergy.
When the guy said, "Yes.
" Then the neighbor could explain that he had been running the wifi the whole time, but without broadcasting the network name.
Seth</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745226</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263303300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Using WiFi is totally legal and within the other home owners rights.</p></div><p>Completely irrelevant. Laws do not make things right. They only make things wrong.</p><p>If wifi would actually harm others, and the user would know it, it&rsquo;s no different than frying someone&rsquo;s head with a couple of microwaves on the other side of the wall where his bad stands. (I remember someone going to jail for doing exactly that.)<br>(Some even argue that it&rsquo;s wrong, even when the user does not know it. But I consider that extremely unfair.)</p><p>I agree on on the fact, that the solution is ridicolously easy: Cover your hous in a faraday cage that has smaller holes than the waves you want to protect yourself from.<br>It&rsquo;s so simple: If you have no reception in the house, you know you are safe. He can <em>prove</em> he gets no reception, and therefore no em fields in his house.</p><p>Yes, for EM fields below a certain strength and wavelength, that is pointless since it can not even heaten up the body, much less cause molecule bonds to rupture.<br>But if that gives him peace of mind, and therefor us too, let&rsquo;s do it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>Man, I wish someone would, in a friendly way, actually <em>explain</em> to him, how this all works, how he can prove it, and how he can do proper tests. Then he might himself have a chance of coming up with the truth. Can&rsquo;t deny what you state yourself. (At least to yourself.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Using WiFi is totally legal and within the other home owners rights.Completely irrelevant .
Laws do not make things right .
They only make things wrong.If wifi would actually harm others , and the user would know it , it    s no different than frying someone    s head with a couple of microwaves on the other side of the wall where his bad stands .
( I remember someone going to jail for doing exactly that .
) ( Some even argue that it    s wrong , even when the user does not know it .
But I consider that extremely unfair .
) I agree on on the fact , that the solution is ridicolously easy : Cover your hous in a faraday cage that has smaller holes than the waves you want to protect yourself from.It    s so simple : If you have no reception in the house , you know you are safe .
He can prove he gets no reception , and therefore no em fields in his house.Yes , for EM fields below a certain strength and wavelength , that is pointless since it can not even heaten up the body , much less cause molecule bonds to rupture.But if that gives him peace of mind , and therefor us too , let    s do it .
; ) Man , I wish someone would , in a friendly way , actually explain to him , how this all works , how he can prove it , and how he can do proper tests .
Then he might himself have a chance of coming up with the truth .
Can    t deny what you state yourself .
( At least to yourself .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using WiFi is totally legal and within the other home owners rights.Completely irrelevant.
Laws do not make things right.
They only make things wrong.If wifi would actually harm others, and the user would know it, it’s no different than frying someone’s head with a couple of microwaves on the other side of the wall where his bad stands.
(I remember someone going to jail for doing exactly that.
)(Some even argue that it’s wrong, even when the user does not know it.
But I consider that extremely unfair.
)I agree on on the fact, that the solution is ridicolously easy: Cover your hous in a faraday cage that has smaller holes than the waves you want to protect yourself from.It’s so simple: If you have no reception in the house, you know you are safe.
He can prove he gets no reception, and therefore no em fields in his house.Yes, for EM fields below a certain strength and wavelength, that is pointless since it can not even heaten up the body, much less cause molecule bonds to rupture.But if that gives him peace of mind, and therefor us too, let’s do it.
;)Man, I wish someone would, in a friendly way, actually explain to him, how this all works, how he can prove it, and how he can do proper tests.
Then he might himself have a chance of coming up with the truth.
Can’t deny what you state yourself.
(At least to yourself.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745948</id>
	<title>Allergies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263307740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I must be allergic to Microsoft Windows. Last time I used it I got rather red in the face. I must have been breaking out in hives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I must be allergic to Microsoft Windows .
Last time I used it I got rather red in the face .
I must have been breaking out in hives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I must be allergic to Microsoft Windows.
Last time I used it I got rather red in the face.
I must have been breaking out in hives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30750516</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Joey Vegetables</author>
	<datestamp>1263398220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It wasn't necessarily in their heads.  It was long believed that the EM radiation from power lines caused cancer.  Controlled studies seemed to provide no evidence of any harmful effects, yet there continued to be cancer clusters near power lines.  Finally, after many decades, someone figured out that the cancers were caused by the herbicides used to clear the area around those lines.  </p><p>It's not implausible that something similar might be occurring here, especially since we know some people are drastically more sensitive to EM radiation and environmental anomalies than others, and since there is still a great deal we don't know about how these things affect our bodies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was n't necessarily in their heads .
It was long believed that the EM radiation from power lines caused cancer .
Controlled studies seemed to provide no evidence of any harmful effects , yet there continued to be cancer clusters near power lines .
Finally , after many decades , someone figured out that the cancers were caused by the herbicides used to clear the area around those lines .
It 's not implausible that something similar might be occurring here , especially since we know some people are drastically more sensitive to EM radiation and environmental anomalies than others , and since there is still a great deal we do n't know about how these things affect our bodies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wasn't necessarily in their heads.
It was long believed that the EM radiation from power lines caused cancer.
Controlled studies seemed to provide no evidence of any harmful effects, yet there continued to be cancer clusters near power lines.
Finally, after many decades, someone figured out that the cancers were caused by the herbicides used to clear the area around those lines.
It's not implausible that something similar might be occurring here, especially since we know some people are drastically more sensitive to EM radiation and environmental anomalies than others, and since there is still a great deal we don't know about how these things affect our bodies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263296520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or let's actually be very fair.<br>Using WiFi is totally legal and within the other home owners rights. Even if he has this alergy it isn't up to his neighbor to do anything about it.<br>May his health insurance provider will offer to build him a Faraday cage. All he would need to do is cover his house with chicken wire, paint and stucco over it and connect it to ground.<br>That would protect him from not only WiFi but also radar from planes flying over head, TV and Radio broadcasts, and even Satellite transmissions.<br>Of course he would have to give up electricity all together to really have an EM free home but that is his problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or let 's actually be very fair.Using WiFi is totally legal and within the other home owners rights .
Even if he has this alergy it is n't up to his neighbor to do anything about it.May his health insurance provider will offer to build him a Faraday cage .
All he would need to do is cover his house with chicken wire , paint and stucco over it and connect it to ground.That would protect him from not only WiFi but also radar from planes flying over head , TV and Radio broadcasts , and even Satellite transmissions.Of course he would have to give up electricity all together to really have an EM free home but that is his problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or let's actually be very fair.Using WiFi is totally legal and within the other home owners rights.
Even if he has this alergy it isn't up to his neighbor to do anything about it.May his health insurance provider will offer to build him a Faraday cage.
All he would need to do is cover his house with chicken wire, paint and stucco over it and connect it to ground.That would protect him from not only WiFi but also radar from planes flying over head, TV and Radio broadcasts, and even Satellite transmissions.Of course he would have to give up electricity all together to really have an EM free home but that is his problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745862</id>
	<title>encrypted wifi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263307020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suffer from Encrypted Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity. I wonder if I can sue all my neighbors for encrypting their WiFi. The encryption messes with my Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suffer from Encrypted Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity .
I wonder if I can sue all my neighbors for encrypting their WiFi .
The encryption messes with my Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suffer from Encrypted Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity.
I wonder if I can sue all my neighbors for encrypting their WiFi.
The encryption messes with my Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747054</id>
	<title>Re:I want to sue as well...</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1263317400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Is he crazy? I wanna sue my neighbour for not turning his WiFi back on!</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

If this guy wins all you need to do is claim you have a wifi dependency and have to court order them to turn it back on.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is he crazy ?
I wan na sue my neighbour for not turning his WiFi back on !
If this guy wins all you need to do is claim you have a wifi dependency and have to court order them to turn it back on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is he crazy?
I wanna sue my neighbour for not turning his WiFi back on!
If this guy wins all you need to do is claim you have a wifi dependency and have to court order them to turn it back on.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744824</id>
	<title>Re:Get off my Astral Plane!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263301200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must like <a href="http://www.guntheranderson.com/v/data/carrotju.htm" title="guntheranderson.com" rel="nofollow">arrogant worms</a> [guntheranderson.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must like arrogant worms [ guntheranderson.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must like arrogant worms [guntheranderson.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745314</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263303900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see a problem with using "allergy" as a short-hand for "negative physiological reaction" in this kind of case.  If the guy *is* suffering because of the behavior of his neighbor (a claim I am certainly highly skeptical of), then it's a legitimate grievance whether or not we choose to call it "allergy."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see a problem with using " allergy " as a short-hand for " negative physiological reaction " in this kind of case .
If the guy * is * suffering because of the behavior of his neighbor ( a claim I am certainly highly skeptical of ) , then it 's a legitimate grievance whether or not we choose to call it " allergy .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see a problem with using "allergy" as a short-hand for "negative physiological reaction" in this kind of case.
If the guy *is* suffering because of the behavior of his neighbor (a claim I am certainly highly skeptical of), then it's a legitimate grievance whether or not we choose to call it "allergy.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745914</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263307380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>[Needs reference]</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ Needs reference ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[Needs reference]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747068</id>
	<title>Re:Don't live there</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1263317640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>As an example, I'm allergic to dogs, but I'm not suing my neighbor for owning one.</p></div> </blockquote><p>

But if the dog kept getting into your yard and the neighbour did nothing to stop it then you have a case. What this hinges on however is that a negative reaction to dog hair can be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt without you being required to do anything (you could be rendered unconscious and still have a negative reaction). No case of EM allergy has ever been proven, or even remotely suspected by any medical professional.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As an example , I 'm allergic to dogs , but I 'm not suing my neighbor for owning one .
But if the dog kept getting into your yard and the neighbour did nothing to stop it then you have a case .
What this hinges on however is that a negative reaction to dog hair can be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt without you being required to do anything ( you could be rendered unconscious and still have a negative reaction ) .
No case of EM allergy has ever been proven , or even remotely suspected by any medical professional .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an example, I'm allergic to dogs, but I'm not suing my neighbor for owning one.
But if the dog kept getting into your yard and the neighbour did nothing to stop it then you have a case.
What this hinges on however is that a negative reaction to dog hair can be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt without you being required to do anything (you could be rendered unconscious and still have a negative reaction).
No case of EM allergy has ever been proven, or even remotely suspected by any medical professional.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743826</id>
	<title>I want to sue as well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263296160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is he crazy? I wanna sue my neighbour for <i>not turning his WiFi back on</i>!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is he crazy ?
I wan na sue my neighbour for not turning his WiFi back on !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is he crazy?
I wanna sue my neighbour for not turning his WiFi back on!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30748656</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>irp</author>
	<datestamp>1263382260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Allergic to sunlight? Are you sure it's not just PSR? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photic\_sneeze\_reflex" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photic\_sneeze\_reflex</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>I have it myself. I usually joke that I'm allergic to crossing the street. The reason; when I look left and right for cars, I will most probable look towards sunlight at some point. The effect is an increased probability that I sneeze while crossing the street<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Allergic to sunlight ?
Are you sure it 's not just PSR ?
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photic \ _sneeze \ _reflex [ wikipedia.org ] I have it myself .
I usually joke that I 'm allergic to crossing the street .
The reason ; when I look left and right for cars , I will most probable look towards sunlight at some point .
The effect is an increased probability that I sneeze while crossing the street : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Allergic to sunlight?
Are you sure it's not just PSR?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photic\_sneeze\_reflex [wikipedia.org]I have it myself.
I usually joke that I'm allergic to crossing the street.
The reason; when I look left and right for cars, I will most probable look towards sunlight at some point.
The effect is an increased probability that I sneeze while crossing the street :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744550</id>
	<title>Re:Get off my Astral Plane!</title>
	<author>Reality Master 301</author>
	<datestamp>1263299640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, Carrot juice is murder: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmK0bZl4ILM" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmK0bZl4ILM</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , Carrot juice is murder : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = KmK0bZl4ILM [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, Carrot juice is murder: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmK0bZl4ILM [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743766</id>
	<title>Don't live there</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263295920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even if we were to assume that these "electromagnetic allergies" did exist, no one is forcing that man to live there. As an example, I'm allergic to dogs, but I'm not suing my neighbor for owning one. It's my choice to live where I do and it's not my prerogative to tell him that he can't own a dog.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if we were to assume that these " electromagnetic allergies " did exist , no one is forcing that man to live there .
As an example , I 'm allergic to dogs , but I 'm not suing my neighbor for owning one .
It 's my choice to live where I do and it 's not my prerogative to tell him that he ca n't own a dog .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if we were to assume that these "electromagnetic allergies" did exist, no one is forcing that man to live there.
As an example, I'm allergic to dogs, but I'm not suing my neighbor for owning one.
It's my choice to live where I do and it's not my prerogative to tell him that he can't own a dog.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743770</id>
	<title>Don't worry Arthur,</title>
	<author>Snowtred</author>
	<datestamp>1263295980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.. we're still watching you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. we 're still watching you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. we're still watching you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744306</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263298440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Applying your test to the real world would immediately introduce a lot of dangerous stuff back. Can you detect the evil cancerogenity of asbestos on your own? Can you "detect" radioactive exposure before the effects of radiation sickness strike? There are a lot of things that bring harm and cannot be felt, proposing to make "what you feel" a standard is more stupid than what this guy is trying to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Applying your test to the real world would immediately introduce a lot of dangerous stuff back .
Can you detect the evil cancerogenity of asbestos on your own ?
Can you " detect " radioactive exposure before the effects of radiation sickness strike ?
There are a lot of things that bring harm and can not be felt , proposing to make " what you feel " a standard is more stupid than what this guy is trying to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Applying your test to the real world would immediately introduce a lot of dangerous stuff back.
Can you detect the evil cancerogenity of asbestos on your own?
Can you "detect" radioactive exposure before the effects of radiation sickness strike?
There are a lot of things that bring harm and cannot be felt, proposing to make "what you feel" a standard is more stupid than what this guy is trying to do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30749454</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263392400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the clean room was to be locked for a  period of one hour but the vial only broken upon the decay of a single atom of an element with a radio-active half-life of one hour then the subject could be viewed as both spotty and not spotty for the duration of that hour - sweet!</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the clean room was to be locked for a period of one hour but the vial only broken upon the decay of a single atom of an element with a radio-active half-life of one hour then the subject could be viewed as both spotty and not spotty for the duration of that hour - sweet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the clean room was to be locked for a  period of one hour but the vial only broken upon the decay of a single atom of an element with a radio-active half-life of one hour then the subject could be viewed as both spotty and not spotty for the duration of that hour - sweet!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30748328</id>
	<title>Allergies don't work like that</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263377460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I am an engineering student who has taken enough physics courses to not believe in Wi-Fi allergies... Allergies really don't work that way. I should know, as I'm allergic to a LOT of things (wheat, eggs, peanuts, some fishes, dust, many animals, apples and many other fruit, milk [yeah, allergic. not lactose intolerant], etc.. list goes on and those have all been tested several times in labs).</p><p>For example, eggs. It's one of those allergies that can send people into the shock and cause deaths, but I've occasionally had a brainfart and eaten an omelet before realizing "Ohhh shit.... shit shit shit..." and then not gotten any problems at all. Peanut allergy is similar: Most people who have it can occasionally eat it and suffer no consequences (perhaps a little coughing), other times the same amounts could cause life threatening situation. With animal allergies it's kinda similar: I'm allergic to dogs and cats and could never have one as a pet but I can sleep a night or two in a relatively clean home that has such and suffer little (if any) problems. There are numerous variables at work here. How healthy are you feeling generally, how much have you slept, what other allergies are active, etc. etc. Just because something causes you notable problems in the long run doesn't mean you could sense it immediatelly.</p><p>WiFi doesn't have enough power to penetrate deep into your body. As such, I can assume that if such allergy would exist, it would have to be something close to surface. IE. itch, dryness of eyes, headaches, etc... Let's say that your eyes can sense it somehow but nearly unnoticeably to you. However, if that continues for long, you often get a headache. Kinda like the difference between watching a 50Hz screen and 70Hz screen. The one with lower refresh rate is more likely to give you a headache if you watch it for hours... That sort of thing is not impossible to test, but it isn't very easy either.</p><p>Hell, doctors can't even test more regular allergies that well. I have been twice to allergy tests in labs: One time in public hospital (socialized healthcare in my country), one time in a private clinic. The methods that were used to tests these varied (they pushed very big, uncomfourtable tongs up my nose in the hospital to take samples for the labs but in the private clinic they made very small cuts to my skin, applied the substances and waited a moment to see the results). The results also varied (for example, the skin test didn't reveal my dust allergy).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I am an engineering student who has taken enough physics courses to not believe in Wi-Fi allergies... Allergies really do n't work that way .
I should know , as I 'm allergic to a LOT of things ( wheat , eggs , peanuts , some fishes , dust , many animals , apples and many other fruit , milk [ yeah , allergic .
not lactose intolerant ] , etc.. list goes on and those have all been tested several times in labs ) .For example , eggs .
It 's one of those allergies that can send people into the shock and cause deaths , but I 've occasionally had a brainfart and eaten an omelet before realizing " Ohhh shit.... shit shit shit... " and then not gotten any problems at all .
Peanut allergy is similar : Most people who have it can occasionally eat it and suffer no consequences ( perhaps a little coughing ) , other times the same amounts could cause life threatening situation .
With animal allergies it 's kinda similar : I 'm allergic to dogs and cats and could never have one as a pet but I can sleep a night or two in a relatively clean home that has such and suffer little ( if any ) problems .
There are numerous variables at work here .
How healthy are you feeling generally , how much have you slept , what other allergies are active , etc .
etc. Just because something causes you notable problems in the long run does n't mean you could sense it immediatelly.WiFi does n't have enough power to penetrate deep into your body .
As such , I can assume that if such allergy would exist , it would have to be something close to surface .
IE. itch , dryness of eyes , headaches , etc... Let 's say that your eyes can sense it somehow but nearly unnoticeably to you .
However , if that continues for long , you often get a headache .
Kinda like the difference between watching a 50Hz screen and 70Hz screen .
The one with lower refresh rate is more likely to give you a headache if you watch it for hours... That sort of thing is not impossible to test , but it is n't very easy either.Hell , doctors ca n't even test more regular allergies that well .
I have been twice to allergy tests in labs : One time in public hospital ( socialized healthcare in my country ) , one time in a private clinic .
The methods that were used to tests these varied ( they pushed very big , uncomfourtable tongs up my nose in the hospital to take samples for the labs but in the private clinic they made very small cuts to my skin , applied the substances and waited a moment to see the results ) .
The results also varied ( for example , the skin test did n't reveal my dust allergy ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I am an engineering student who has taken enough physics courses to not believe in Wi-Fi allergies... Allergies really don't work that way.
I should know, as I'm allergic to a LOT of things (wheat, eggs, peanuts, some fishes, dust, many animals, apples and many other fruit, milk [yeah, allergic.
not lactose intolerant], etc.. list goes on and those have all been tested several times in labs).For example, eggs.
It's one of those allergies that can send people into the shock and cause deaths, but I've occasionally had a brainfart and eaten an omelet before realizing "Ohhh shit.... shit shit shit..." and then not gotten any problems at all.
Peanut allergy is similar: Most people who have it can occasionally eat it and suffer no consequences (perhaps a little coughing), other times the same amounts could cause life threatening situation.
With animal allergies it's kinda similar: I'm allergic to dogs and cats and could never have one as a pet but I can sleep a night or two in a relatively clean home that has such and suffer little (if any) problems.
There are numerous variables at work here.
How healthy are you feeling generally, how much have you slept, what other allergies are active, etc.
etc. Just because something causes you notable problems in the long run doesn't mean you could sense it immediatelly.WiFi doesn't have enough power to penetrate deep into your body.
As such, I can assume that if such allergy would exist, it would have to be something close to surface.
IE. itch, dryness of eyes, headaches, etc... Let's say that your eyes can sense it somehow but nearly unnoticeably to you.
However, if that continues for long, you often get a headache.
Kinda like the difference between watching a 50Hz screen and 70Hz screen.
The one with lower refresh rate is more likely to give you a headache if you watch it for hours... That sort of thing is not impossible to test, but it isn't very easy either.Hell, doctors can't even test more regular allergies that well.
I have been twice to allergy tests in labs: One time in public hospital (socialized healthcare in my country), one time in a private clinic.
The methods that were used to tests these varied (they pushed very big, uncomfourtable tongs up my nose in the hospital to take samples for the labs but in the private clinic they made very small cuts to my skin, applied the substances and waited a moment to see the results).
The results also varied (for example, the skin test didn't reveal my dust allergy).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743756</id>
	<title>Seems oddly like...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263295920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>This seems a lot like <a href="http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/09/07/27/1514209/English-DJ-Claims-Wi-Fi-Allergy" title="slashdot.org">http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/09/07/27/1514209/English-DJ-Claims-Wi-Fi-Allergy</a> [slashdot.org] which was proven to be a PR stunt in <a href="http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/09/07/31/1528241/Wi-Fi-Allergy-a-PR-Stunt" title="slashdot.org">http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/09/07/31/1528241/Wi-Fi-Allergy-a-PR-Stunt</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems a lot like http : //mobile.slashdot.org/story/09/07/27/1514209/English-DJ-Claims-Wi-Fi-Allergy [ slashdot.org ] which was proven to be a PR stunt in http : //mobile.slashdot.org/story/09/07/31/1528241/Wi-Fi-Allergy-a-PR-Stunt [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems a lot like http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/09/07/27/1514209/English-DJ-Claims-Wi-Fi-Allergy [slashdot.org] which was proven to be a PR stunt in http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/09/07/31/1528241/Wi-Fi-Allergy-a-PR-Stunt [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743986</id>
	<title>Re:He will have a hard time proving his case</title>
	<author>rrhal</author>
	<datestamp>1263296880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To the defendant - counter sue for this blatant disregard for your allergy to small minded ass-holes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To the defendant - counter sue for this blatant disregard for your allergy to small minded ass-holes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To the defendant - counter sue for this blatant disregard for your allergy to small minded ass-holes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744766</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>TheCow</author>
	<datestamp>1263300780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just use the wifi blocking paint that came out a few years ago.  Add some to your windows and Problem solved...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just use the wifi blocking paint that came out a few years ago .
Add some to your windows and Problem solved.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just use the wifi blocking paint that came out a few years ago.
Add some to your windows and Problem solved...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743732</id>
	<title>tinfoil condom...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263295800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Trojan, please.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Trojan , please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trojan, please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747656</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263323100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, we use this principle in American litigation. It explains why each party is [generally] responsible for their own attorney's fees. The idea is that the cost of the litigation itself will deter invalid claims, and most state bars have a minimum pricing schedule to prevent lawyers from undercutting to allow crazy lawsuits (amongst other things; also, this excludes pro bono work).</p><p>Also, IAALS (I am a law student [in the US]), and a lurker.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , we use this principle in American litigation .
It explains why each party is [ generally ] responsible for their own attorney 's fees .
The idea is that the cost of the litigation itself will deter invalid claims , and most state bars have a minimum pricing schedule to prevent lawyers from undercutting to allow crazy lawsuits ( amongst other things ; also , this excludes pro bono work ) .Also , IAALS ( I am a law student [ in the US ] ) , and a lurker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, we use this principle in American litigation.
It explains why each party is [generally] responsible for their own attorney's fees.
The idea is that the cost of the litigation itself will deter invalid claims, and most state bars have a minimum pricing schedule to prevent lawyers from undercutting to allow crazy lawsuits (amongst other things; also, this excludes pro bono work).Also, IAALS (I am a law student [in the US]), and a lurker.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Leebert</author>
	<datestamp>1263297120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Put him in a room, and turn the wireless on and off. Guaranteed he won't be able to tell the difference.</p></div><p>That's all well and good, and I'm sure the guy is full of it, BUT...</p><p>Many allergic reactions (like my own seasonal allergies) don't come and go like a light switch in the presence or absence of the allergen.</p><p>I could sit in a clean room for 2 or 3 days after getting really spun up from my tree allergies until the symptoms really begin to diminish.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Put him in a room , and turn the wireless on and off .
Guaranteed he wo n't be able to tell the difference.That 's all well and good , and I 'm sure the guy is full of it , BUT...Many allergic reactions ( like my own seasonal allergies ) do n't come and go like a light switch in the presence or absence of the allergen.I could sit in a clean room for 2 or 3 days after getting really spun up from my tree allergies until the symptoms really begin to diminish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Put him in a room, and turn the wireless on and off.
Guaranteed he won't be able to tell the difference.That's all well and good, and I'm sure the guy is full of it, BUT...Many allergic reactions (like my own seasonal allergies) don't come and go like a light switch in the presence or absence of the allergen.I could sit in a clean room for 2 or 3 days after getting really spun up from my tree allergies until the symptoms really begin to diminish.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30748226</id>
	<title>KC2UFO</title>
	<author>Nonillion</author>
	<datestamp>1263375720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone else notice that the guy in the image is wearing a shirt with a ham radio call sign?</p><p>SKYWATCHERS AND COMMUNICATORS, KC2UFO [Club]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else notice that the guy in the image is wearing a shirt with a ham radio call sign ? SKYWATCHERS AND COMMUNICATORS , KC2UFO [ Club ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else notice that the guy in the image is wearing a shirt with a ham radio call sign?SKYWATCHERS AND COMMUNICATORS, KC2UFO [Club]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747378</id>
	<title>Re:I want to sue as well...</title>
	<author>DiEx-15</author>
	<datestamp>1263320520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Amen to that!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Amen to that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amen to that!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745192</id>
	<title>Re:Microwave Ovens? Cordless Phones?</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1263303180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>On a more serious note, this guy needs to be sued into bankruptcy.</i>
<br>
<br>
Or, you could, you know, show compassion for someone who is clearly mentally disturbed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>On a more serious note , this guy needs to be sued into bankruptcy .
Or , you could , you know , show compassion for someone who is clearly mentally disturbed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On a more serious note, this guy needs to be sued into bankruptcy.
Or, you could, you know, show compassion for someone who is clearly mentally disturbed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744694</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263300360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even if he is alergic to it, which is probably his own imagination, he could just paint his house or walls with something to block the wifi frequencies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if he is alergic to it , which is probably his own imagination , he could just paint his house or walls with something to block the wifi frequencies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if he is alergic to it, which is probably his own imagination, he could just paint his house or walls with something to block the wifi frequencies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744020</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Rei</author>
	<datestamp>1263297060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That can't stop you from suing.  Look at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan\_Lee\_Riches" title="wikipedia.org">Jonathan Lee Riches</a> [wikipedia.org].  This is a guy who sued the Guinness Book of World Records for listing him as the man who's filed the most lawsuits in the history of mankind.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)  He's among others, he's sued Bill Belichick, George W. Bush, Martha Stewart, Jeff Gordon, Michael Vick, Steve Jobs, Perez Hilton, Somali pirates, Britney Spears, Benazir Bhutto, Pervez Musharraf, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Adolf Hitler's National Socialist Party, the 13 tribes of Israel, Plato, Nostradamus, Che Guevara, James Hoffa, "Various Buddhist Monks", the Lincoln Memorial, the Eiffel Tower, the USS Cole, the book Mein Kampf, the Garden of Eden, the Roman Empire, the Appalachian Trail, Plymouth Rock, the Holy Grail, the dwarf planet Pluto, and the entire Three Mile Island.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That ca n't stop you from suing .
Look at Jonathan Lee Riches [ wikipedia.org ] .
This is a guy who sued the Guinness Book of World Records for listing him as the man who 's filed the most lawsuits in the history of mankind .
; ) He 's among others , he 's sued Bill Belichick , George W. Bush , Martha Stewart , Jeff Gordon , Michael Vick , Steve Jobs , Perez Hilton , Somali pirates , Britney Spears , Benazir Bhutto , Pervez Musharraf , the Immigration and Naturalization Service , Adolf Hitler 's National Socialist Party , the 13 tribes of Israel , Plato , Nostradamus , Che Guevara , James Hoffa , " Various Buddhist Monks " , the Lincoln Memorial , the Eiffel Tower , the USS Cole , the book Mein Kampf , the Garden of Eden , the Roman Empire , the Appalachian Trail , Plymouth Rock , the Holy Grail , the dwarf planet Pluto , and the entire Three Mile Island .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That can't stop you from suing.
Look at Jonathan Lee Riches [wikipedia.org].
This is a guy who sued the Guinness Book of World Records for listing him as the man who's filed the most lawsuits in the history of mankind.
;)  He's among others, he's sued Bill Belichick, George W. Bush, Martha Stewart, Jeff Gordon, Michael Vick, Steve Jobs, Perez Hilton, Somali pirates, Britney Spears, Benazir Bhutto, Pervez Musharraf, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Adolf Hitler's National Socialist Party, the 13 tribes of Israel, Plato, Nostradamus, Che Guevara, James Hoffa, "Various Buddhist Monks", the Lincoln Memorial, the Eiffel Tower, the USS Cole, the book Mein Kampf, the Garden of Eden, the Roman Empire, the Appalachian Trail, Plymouth Rock, the Holy Grail, the dwarf planet Pluto, and the entire Three Mile Island.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745024</id>
	<title>Actually, a tin foil had AMPLIFIES the wi-fi!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263302400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As some old<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. article that i&rsquo;m to lazy to find right now, stated.</p><p>Also, cue the countless counter-arguments to his &ldquo;allergy&rdquo; that are just as if not even more retarded. Like &ldquo;Put him in a room, and turn the wireless on and off. Guaranteed he won't be able to tell the difference.&rdquo; As if that was relevant.</p><p>But I wish he and his friends come here, and you all bash your heads in, until the few reasonable people remain. ^^<br>Protip: If you <em>do not</em> wonder what the point of (taking) <em>sides</em> in such discussions is, you will not remain.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As some old / .
article that i    m to lazy to find right now , stated.Also , cue the countless counter-arguments to his    allergy    that are just as if not even more retarded .
Like    Put him in a room , and turn the wireless on and off .
Guaranteed he wo n't be able to tell the difference.    As if that was relevant.But I wish he and his friends come here , and you all bash your heads in , until the few reasonable people remain .
^ ^ Protip : If you do not wonder what the point of ( taking ) sides in such discussions is , you will not remain .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As some old /.
article that i’m to lazy to find right now, stated.Also, cue the countless counter-arguments to his “allergy” that are just as if not even more retarded.
Like “Put him in a room, and turn the wireless on and off.
Guaranteed he won't be able to tell the difference.” As if that was relevant.But I wish he and his friends come here, and you all bash your heads in, until the few reasonable people remain.
^^Protip: If you do not wonder what the point of (taking) sides in such discussions is, you will not remain.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30750500</id>
	<title>Re:I want to sue as well...</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1263398160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doctor: "Ah. I see you've got that not-so-rare allergic reaction to the lack of open Wi-Fi signals. Symptoms include restlessness (over no WiFi), anger (directed at computers with no WiFi to connect to) and twitching (when thinking of all the stuff on the Internet you can't access).  Take two open WiFi signals from your neighbors and call me in the morning."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Doctor : " Ah .
I see you 've got that not-so-rare allergic reaction to the lack of open Wi-Fi signals .
Symptoms include restlessness ( over no WiFi ) , anger ( directed at computers with no WiFi to connect to ) and twitching ( when thinking of all the stuff on the Internet you ca n't access ) .
Take two open WiFi signals from your neighbors and call me in the morning .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doctor: "Ah.
I see you've got that not-so-rare allergic reaction to the lack of open Wi-Fi signals.
Symptoms include restlessness (over no WiFi), anger (directed at computers with no WiFi to connect to) and twitching (when thinking of all the stuff on the Internet you can't access).
Take two open WiFi signals from your neighbors and call me in the morning.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30755644</id>
	<title>Re:Don't live there</title>
	<author>fishexe</author>
	<datestamp>1263374940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Even if we were to assume that these "electromagnetic allergies" did exist, no one is forcing that man to live there.</p></div><p>You're right, they're forcing him to live in his car!  Didn't you RTFA?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if we were to assume that these " electromagnetic allergies " did exist , no one is forcing that man to live there.You 're right , they 're forcing him to live in his car !
Did n't you RTFA ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if we were to assume that these "electromagnetic allergies" did exist, no one is forcing that man to live there.You're right, they're forcing him to live in his car!
Didn't you RTFA?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743936</id>
	<title>Re:Don't live there</title>
	<author>seanadams.com</author>
	<datestamp>1263296700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Even if we were to assume that these "electromagnetic allergies" did exist, no one is forcing that man to live there. As an example, I'm allergic to dogs, but I'm not suing my neighbor for owning one. It's my choice to live where I do and it's not my prerogative to tell him that he can't own a dog.</i></p><p>That's not how it works - homeowners legally entitled to some degree of peace and quiet. There are local ordinances for that sort of thing, as dogs are a potential disturbance. Your neighbor probably can't legally keep six dogs in a suburb backyard, for example, although a reasonable neighbor wouldn't complain unless they were barking all night or something. The point is, it's not the free-for-all you're imagining.</p><p>In this case the emissions are regulated by the FCC and if the guy's router is operating within the limits for the unlicensed band then there is simply no actionable offense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if we were to assume that these " electromagnetic allergies " did exist , no one is forcing that man to live there .
As an example , I 'm allergic to dogs , but I 'm not suing my neighbor for owning one .
It 's my choice to live where I do and it 's not my prerogative to tell him that he ca n't own a dog.That 's not how it works - homeowners legally entitled to some degree of peace and quiet .
There are local ordinances for that sort of thing , as dogs are a potential disturbance .
Your neighbor probably ca n't legally keep six dogs in a suburb backyard , for example , although a reasonable neighbor would n't complain unless they were barking all night or something .
The point is , it 's not the free-for-all you 're imagining.In this case the emissions are regulated by the FCC and if the guy 's router is operating within the limits for the unlicensed band then there is simply no actionable offense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if we were to assume that these "electromagnetic allergies" did exist, no one is forcing that man to live there.
As an example, I'm allergic to dogs, but I'm not suing my neighbor for owning one.
It's my choice to live where I do and it's not my prerogative to tell him that he can't own a dog.That's not how it works - homeowners legally entitled to some degree of peace and quiet.
There are local ordinances for that sort of thing, as dogs are a potential disturbance.
Your neighbor probably can't legally keep six dogs in a suburb backyard, for example, although a reasonable neighbor wouldn't complain unless they were barking all night or something.
The point is, it's not the free-for-all you're imagining.In this case the emissions are regulated by the FCC and if the guy's router is operating within the limits for the unlicensed band then there is simply no actionable offense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30755376</id>
	<title>I will sue the Record Companies....</title>
	<author>BatGnat</author>
	<datestamp>1263373920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They constantly pay radio stations to broadcast music into my head.  Where did I put my tin foil hat again...</htmltext>
<tokenext>They constantly pay radio stations to broadcast music into my head .
Where did I put my tin foil hat again.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They constantly pay radio stations to broadcast music into my head.
Where did I put my tin foil hat again...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743834</id>
	<title>Lost Money</title>
	<author>b4upoo</author>
	<datestamp>1263296160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>           I am so certain that this poor jerk's investment in a law suit will bring him good results. The settlement will be delivered in a car driven by Elvis with Jimmy Hoffa representing the defendant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am so certain that this poor jerk 's investment in a law suit will bring him good results .
The settlement will be delivered in a car driven by Elvis with Jimmy Hoffa representing the defendant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>           I am so certain that this poor jerk's investment in a law suit will bring him good results.
The settlement will be delivered in a car driven by Elvis with Jimmy Hoffa representing the defendant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747330</id>
	<title>So far "radio wave allergy" proven non-existent</title>
	<author>puhuri</author>
	<datestamp>1263319980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least for GSM frequencies: 84 subjects (for total 600 trials) had to guess if mobile phone was on, or if it state changed. If one had 3 out of 4 right, 50 euro reward was given. No-one claimed that, even if there was six persons that told being very sensitive to "mobile phone radiation".</p><p>Also some other tests were done about effects on humans, but with no results. Kwon, Myoung Soo: <a href="https://oa.doria.fi/handle/10024/50473" title="doria.fi">Effects of mobile phone electromagnetic field: behavioral and neurophysiological measurements</a> [doria.fi], PhD thesis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least for GSM frequencies : 84 subjects ( for total 600 trials ) had to guess if mobile phone was on , or if it state changed .
If one had 3 out of 4 right , 50 euro reward was given .
No-one claimed that , even if there was six persons that told being very sensitive to " mobile phone radiation " .Also some other tests were done about effects on humans , but with no results .
Kwon , Myoung Soo : Effects of mobile phone electromagnetic field : behavioral and neurophysiological measurements [ doria.fi ] , PhD thesis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least for GSM frequencies: 84 subjects (for total 600 trials) had to guess if mobile phone was on, or if it state changed.
If one had 3 out of 4 right, 50 euro reward was given.
No-one claimed that, even if there was six persons that told being very sensitive to "mobile phone radiation".Also some other tests were done about effects on humans, but with no results.
Kwon, Myoung Soo: Effects of mobile phone electromagnetic field: behavioral and neurophysiological measurements [doria.fi], PhD thesis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30746758</id>
	<title>Digital TV also a problem</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1263314580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Digital TV is also a problem for that guy.  He's collecting stories from people complaining that the switch from analog to digital TV affected them.  These people are complaining about things which happened after the DTV switchover.  They don't realize the DTV signals have been around for years, and the only thing that happened on that date was the turning off of analog TV transmitters.
<p>
So they're actually claiming to have problems due to less electromagnetic radiation.  I wonder how badly they're affected by cats or synthetic shirts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Digital TV is also a problem for that guy .
He 's collecting stories from people complaining that the switch from analog to digital TV affected them .
These people are complaining about things which happened after the DTV switchover .
They do n't realize the DTV signals have been around for years , and the only thing that happened on that date was the turning off of analog TV transmitters .
So they 're actually claiming to have problems due to less electromagnetic radiation .
I wonder how badly they 're affected by cats or synthetic shirts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Digital TV is also a problem for that guy.
He's collecting stories from people complaining that the switch from analog to digital TV affected them.
These people are complaining about things which happened after the DTV switchover.
They don't realize the DTV signals have been around for years, and the only thing that happened on that date was the turning off of analog TV transmitters.
So they're actually claiming to have problems due to less electromagnetic radiation.
I wonder how badly they're affected by cats or synthetic shirts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30751730</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263402960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you ever get a chance you should take a tour of a power substation.  I am 6'6" and when I stood under those power lines I could definitely feel something depending on where I stood.  If you stand underneath the middle conductor, when they are in a plane, then the feeling was marginal.  When you stand to one side you can feel a difference.  Now you can certainly argue that I knew about the power lines and so imagined the feeling but I went in feeling like I wouldn't notice anything like that.  It is also really neat to listen to the corona when being around that equipment.</p><p>I mentioned the height because it seemed that the taller you were in our class the more pronounced the effect was.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you ever get a chance you should take a tour of a power substation .
I am 6'6 " and when I stood under those power lines I could definitely feel something depending on where I stood .
If you stand underneath the middle conductor , when they are in a plane , then the feeling was marginal .
When you stand to one side you can feel a difference .
Now you can certainly argue that I knew about the power lines and so imagined the feeling but I went in feeling like I would n't notice anything like that .
It is also really neat to listen to the corona when being around that equipment.I mentioned the height because it seemed that the taller you were in our class the more pronounced the effect was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you ever get a chance you should take a tour of a power substation.
I am 6'6" and when I stood under those power lines I could definitely feel something depending on where I stood.
If you stand underneath the middle conductor, when they are in a plane, then the feeling was marginal.
When you stand to one side you can feel a difference.
Now you can certainly argue that I knew about the power lines and so imagined the feeling but I went in feeling like I wouldn't notice anything like that.
It is also really neat to listen to the corona when being around that equipment.I mentioned the height because it seemed that the taller you were in our class the more pronounced the effect was.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743824</id>
	<title>Simple test...</title>
	<author>Loki\_1929</author>
	<datestamp>1263296160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think this guy's full of it, but there's a pretty simple test. Blindfold him and drive him out to a nice, open, quiet country setting. Something with lots of fresh air, birds chirping, no cars, no people, etc. Somewhere where you can smell flowers from a mile away and it feels like you're on a country road in the middle of nowhere. Park under high tension lines. Then ask him how he feels. If he's not on the ground doubled over in pain, he's a POS and full of it.</p><p>And if this guy really does have that severe a reaction to all technology, then Darwin says he should go stuff. Let him join an Amish community and live the rest of his life in peace. He has no right to shut down every invention of the past hundred years everywhere he goes simply because he's a genetic disaster.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this guy 's full of it , but there 's a pretty simple test .
Blindfold him and drive him out to a nice , open , quiet country setting .
Something with lots of fresh air , birds chirping , no cars , no people , etc .
Somewhere where you can smell flowers from a mile away and it feels like you 're on a country road in the middle of nowhere .
Park under high tension lines .
Then ask him how he feels .
If he 's not on the ground doubled over in pain , he 's a POS and full of it.And if this guy really does have that severe a reaction to all technology , then Darwin says he should go stuff .
Let him join an Amish community and live the rest of his life in peace .
He has no right to shut down every invention of the past hundred years everywhere he goes simply because he 's a genetic disaster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this guy's full of it, but there's a pretty simple test.
Blindfold him and drive him out to a nice, open, quiet country setting.
Something with lots of fresh air, birds chirping, no cars, no people, etc.
Somewhere where you can smell flowers from a mile away and it feels like you're on a country road in the middle of nowhere.
Park under high tension lines.
Then ask him how he feels.
If he's not on the ground doubled over in pain, he's a POS and full of it.And if this guy really does have that severe a reaction to all technology, then Darwin says he should go stuff.
Let him join an Amish community and live the rest of his life in peace.
He has no right to shut down every invention of the past hundred years everywhere he goes simply because he's a genetic disaster.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743850</id>
	<title>Only the ones he knows about.</title>
	<author>Bender Unit 22</author>
	<datestamp>1263296220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the popular radiowaves he knows/thinks about bothers him but not all the other sources.<br>Lets hope he does not park his car close to a cell tower, a tv or radio transmitter etc.</p><p>Better yet, give him a Wi-spy and let him scan 2.4GHz for all the other crap there like car alarms, baby monitors, etc. He well never find a place to sleep.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the popular radiowaves he knows/thinks about bothers him but not all the other sources.Lets hope he does not park his car close to a cell tower , a tv or radio transmitter etc.Better yet , give him a Wi-spy and let him scan 2.4GHz for all the other crap there like car alarms , baby monitors , etc .
He well never find a place to sleep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the popular radiowaves he knows/thinks about bothers him but not all the other sources.Lets hope he does not park his car close to a cell tower, a tv or radio transmitter etc.Better yet, give him a Wi-spy and let him scan 2.4GHz for all the other crap there like car alarms, baby monitors, etc.
He well never find a place to sleep.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747848</id>
	<title>Re:Psychology rather than Electromagnetics</title>
	<author>snowgirl</author>
	<datestamp>1263326340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia</a> [wikipedia.org] </p><p>Its a little scary but I dated a lady for a while who thought the government was using here for non lethal weapons testing, by hitting her with EM waves.</p><p>Pity... Good looking with a very nice body... Such a waste...</p></div><p>I was dating a guy once who was absolutely paranoid that I was cheating on him... then he actually caught me in bed with the other guy... OOPS!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia [ wikipedia.org ] Its a little scary but I dated a lady for a while who thought the government was using here for non lethal weapons testing , by hitting her with EM waves.Pity... Good looking with a very nice body... Such a waste...I was dating a guy once who was absolutely paranoid that I was cheating on him... then he actually caught me in bed with the other guy... OOPS ! : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia [wikipedia.org] Its a little scary but I dated a lady for a while who thought the government was using here for non lethal weapons testing, by hitting her with EM waves.Pity... Good looking with a very nice body... Such a waste...I was dating a guy once who was absolutely paranoid that I was cheating on him... then he actually caught me in bed with the other guy... OOPS! :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744562</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>djdavetrouble</author>
	<datestamp>1263299700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is suspected that this lawsuit was really a conspiracy just designed to get all named plantiffs one degree of separation away from Kevin Bacon (also named in the suit).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is suspected that this lawsuit was really a conspiracy just designed to get all named plantiffs one degree of separation away from Kevin Bacon ( also named in the suit ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is suspected that this lawsuit was really a conspiracy just designed to get all named plantiffs one degree of separation away from Kevin Bacon (also named in the suit).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30755008</id>
	<title>Not just proteins</title>
	<author>MrBippers</author>
	<datestamp>1263415680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While proteins are among the most common causes of immune response, they are certainly not the only thing capable of invoking it.  Carbohydrates and small molecule compoundscan elicit response as well.  Look at common examples like nickel sulfate hexahydrate responsible for the allergic reaction to low purity gold or penicillin allergy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While proteins are among the most common causes of immune response , they are certainly not the only thing capable of invoking it .
Carbohydrates and small molecule compoundscan elicit response as well .
Look at common examples like nickel sulfate hexahydrate responsible for the allergic reaction to low purity gold or penicillin allergy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While proteins are among the most common causes of immune response, they are certainly not the only thing capable of invoking it.
Carbohydrates and small molecule compoundscan elicit response as well.
Look at common examples like nickel sulfate hexahydrate responsible for the allergic reaction to low purity gold or penicillin allergy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744086</id>
	<title>Re:Don't live there</title>
	<author>snowgirl</author>
	<datestamp>1263297300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Even if we were to assume that these "electromagnetic allergies" did exist, no one is forcing that man to live there. As an example, I'm allergic to dogs, but I'm not suing my neighbor for owning one. It's my choice to live where I do and it's not my prerogative to tell him that he can't own a dog.</p></div><p>The law provides that it is unreasonable for someone to create a nuisance to another person that impinges upon their ability to enjoy their property.</p><p>You <i>could</i> sue your neighbor complaining about the allergies, but you likely wouldn't because it's not worth the legal effort.  However, let's take a different example, your neighbor is now a manufacturing plant that came in after you bought your property, and has begun polluting the air.  Guess what?  They're not allowed to unreasonably pollute, and if it causes health effects upon you or your family, or even your guests, then it's their fault for causing those damages.</p><p>Pollution laws are built upon the same legal principles and standards as noise pollution, and allergy aggravation.  As a prime example, suppose a person Alice is living in a house, and her neighbor Bob decides to plant peanuts, and make homemade peanut butter.  Everything is fine, until some of the peanut dust floats into Alice's home and causes a severe anaphylactic shock response in Alice, who then has to be rushed to the hospital, where she recovers.  She is now unable to return to her home, until the peanut dust has been removed, and the neighbor stops growing the peanuts.</p><p>Guess what?  The law stands with Alice.  She could sue Bob, and receive an injunction forcing him to stop growing peanuts, and potentially receive compensation for the damages caused (medical bills, hotel stays, etc.)  This is of course all contingent upon Alice being able to take reasonable precautions to mitigate those damages.  Namely, is there any way that she could reasonably prevent the nuisance without imposing on Bob.  In this example? No.</p><p>In your case, you can put up a fence, and take drugs to prevent allergic reactions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if we were to assume that these " electromagnetic allergies " did exist , no one is forcing that man to live there .
As an example , I 'm allergic to dogs , but I 'm not suing my neighbor for owning one .
It 's my choice to live where I do and it 's not my prerogative to tell him that he ca n't own a dog.The law provides that it is unreasonable for someone to create a nuisance to another person that impinges upon their ability to enjoy their property.You could sue your neighbor complaining about the allergies , but you likely would n't because it 's not worth the legal effort .
However , let 's take a different example , your neighbor is now a manufacturing plant that came in after you bought your property , and has begun polluting the air .
Guess what ?
They 're not allowed to unreasonably pollute , and if it causes health effects upon you or your family , or even your guests , then it 's their fault for causing those damages.Pollution laws are built upon the same legal principles and standards as noise pollution , and allergy aggravation .
As a prime example , suppose a person Alice is living in a house , and her neighbor Bob decides to plant peanuts , and make homemade peanut butter .
Everything is fine , until some of the peanut dust floats into Alice 's home and causes a severe anaphylactic shock response in Alice , who then has to be rushed to the hospital , where she recovers .
She is now unable to return to her home , until the peanut dust has been removed , and the neighbor stops growing the peanuts.Guess what ?
The law stands with Alice .
She could sue Bob , and receive an injunction forcing him to stop growing peanuts , and potentially receive compensation for the damages caused ( medical bills , hotel stays , etc .
) This is of course all contingent upon Alice being able to take reasonable precautions to mitigate those damages .
Namely , is there any way that she could reasonably prevent the nuisance without imposing on Bob .
In this example ?
No.In your case , you can put up a fence , and take drugs to prevent allergic reactions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if we were to assume that these "electromagnetic allergies" did exist, no one is forcing that man to live there.
As an example, I'm allergic to dogs, but I'm not suing my neighbor for owning one.
It's my choice to live where I do and it's not my prerogative to tell him that he can't own a dog.The law provides that it is unreasonable for someone to create a nuisance to another person that impinges upon their ability to enjoy their property.You could sue your neighbor complaining about the allergies, but you likely wouldn't because it's not worth the legal effort.
However, let's take a different example, your neighbor is now a manufacturing plant that came in after you bought your property, and has begun polluting the air.
Guess what?
They're not allowed to unreasonably pollute, and if it causes health effects upon you or your family, or even your guests, then it's their fault for causing those damages.Pollution laws are built upon the same legal principles and standards as noise pollution, and allergy aggravation.
As a prime example, suppose a person Alice is living in a house, and her neighbor Bob decides to plant peanuts, and make homemade peanut butter.
Everything is fine, until some of the peanut dust floats into Alice's home and causes a severe anaphylactic shock response in Alice, who then has to be rushed to the hospital, where she recovers.
She is now unable to return to her home, until the peanut dust has been removed, and the neighbor stops growing the peanuts.Guess what?
The law stands with Alice.
She could sue Bob, and receive an injunction forcing him to stop growing peanuts, and potentially receive compensation for the damages caused (medical bills, hotel stays, etc.
)  This is of course all contingent upon Alice being able to take reasonable precautions to mitigate those damages.
Namely, is there any way that she could reasonably prevent the nuisance without imposing on Bob.
In this example?
No.In your case, you can put up a fence, and take drugs to prevent allergic reactions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743754</id>
	<title>Microwave Ovens? Cordless Phones?</title>
	<author>PhrostyMcByte</author>
	<datestamp>1263295860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does he sue neighbors for nuking food too?  What about talking on cordless phones?  Using bluetooth headsets or wireless console controllers?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does he sue neighbors for nuking food too ?
What about talking on cordless phones ?
Using bluetooth headsets or wireless console controllers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does he sue neighbors for nuking food too?
What about talking on cordless phones?
Using bluetooth headsets or wireless console controllers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745838</id>
	<title>Not impossible...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263306900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not impossible to be affected by WiFi or cellphones. When I used to have wireless internet in my house, I could sometimes feel a pressure in my ears when not far away from the transmitter/receiver. Some people are just much more sensitive than others. I doubt that a tinfoil hat would do anything, though. I think I remember hearing that one of the U.S. states was going to require a "may cause cancer" label on cellphones. Is it really so far-fetched to think someone could feel themselves being negatively affected by something like that? Maybe it's like a paper cut, huh? Some people can get one and recoil immediately and feel a lot of pain right away whereas others don't notice and later wonder where they got it...food for thought.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not impossible to be affected by WiFi or cellphones .
When I used to have wireless internet in my house , I could sometimes feel a pressure in my ears when not far away from the transmitter/receiver .
Some people are just much more sensitive than others .
I doubt that a tinfoil hat would do anything , though .
I think I remember hearing that one of the U.S. states was going to require a " may cause cancer " label on cellphones .
Is it really so far-fetched to think someone could feel themselves being negatively affected by something like that ?
Maybe it 's like a paper cut , huh ?
Some people can get one and recoil immediately and feel a lot of pain right away whereas others do n't notice and later wonder where they got it...food for thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not impossible to be affected by WiFi or cellphones.
When I used to have wireless internet in my house, I could sometimes feel a pressure in my ears when not far away from the transmitter/receiver.
Some people are just much more sensitive than others.
I doubt that a tinfoil hat would do anything, though.
I think I remember hearing that one of the U.S. states was going to require a "may cause cancer" label on cellphones.
Is it really so far-fetched to think someone could feel themselves being negatively affected by something like that?
Maybe it's like a paper cut, huh?
Some people can get one and recoil immediately and feel a lot of pain right away whereas others don't notice and later wonder where they got it...food for thought.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744062</id>
	<title>Re:I want to sue as well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263297180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any one else think the summary said this at first?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any one else think the summary said this at first ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any one else think the summary said this at first?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745606</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>roc97007</author>
	<datestamp>1263305520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
So, have you sued your neighbors yet for having trees?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , have you sued your neighbors yet for having trees ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
So, have you sued your neighbors yet for having trees?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743776</id>
	<title>Late... again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263295980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/12/santa-fe-wifi-foe-strikes-again-sues-neighbor-for-using-wireles/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.engadget.com/2010/01/12/santa-fe-wifi-foe-strikes-again-sues-neighbor-for-using-wireles/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/12/santa-fe-wifi-foe-strikes-again-sues-neighbor-for-using-wireles/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745564</id>
	<title>He's not an idiot</title>
	<author>seeker\_1us</author>
	<datestamp>1263305340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's pretty clear he's mentally ill.  Please show some compassion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's pretty clear he 's mentally ill. Please show some compassion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's pretty clear he's mentally ill.  Please show some compassion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30755840</id>
	<title>Re:Get off my Astral Plane!</title>
	<author>fishexe</author>
	<datestamp>1263375720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And stop eating meat OR veggies -- I can hear the carrots scream!</p></div><p>Not til you get the hell out of my aura!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And stop eating meat OR veggies -- I can hear the carrots scream ! Not til you get the hell out of my aura !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And stop eating meat OR veggies -- I can hear the carrots scream!Not til you get the hell out of my aura!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744906</id>
	<title>Re:Microwave Ovens? Cordless Phones?</title>
	<author>Xabraxas</author>
	<datestamp>1263301680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only reason he is homeless is because he claims he cannot live in his home because of the WiFi signals.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only reason he is homeless is because he claims he can not live in his home because of the WiFi signals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only reason he is homeless is because he claims he cannot live in his home because of the WiFi signals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745320</id>
	<title>Re:Don't live there</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263303960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is this the SAME Alice and Bob that send encrypted messages?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this the SAME Alice and Bob that send encrypted messages ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this the SAME Alice and Bob that send encrypted messages?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743832</id>
	<title>Re:Microwave Ovens? Cordless Phones?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263296160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He clearly needs to sue the Sun for giving such a constant stream of high energy particles.  Then, of course, there's the galaxy, with those awful cosmic rays.  Hell, there's the blackbody radiation.</p><p>I hope this guys has a lawyer with a pretty clear schedule.</p><p>On a more serious note, this guy needs to be sued into bankruptcy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He clearly needs to sue the Sun for giving such a constant stream of high energy particles .
Then , of course , there 's the galaxy , with those awful cosmic rays .
Hell , there 's the blackbody radiation.I hope this guys has a lawyer with a pretty clear schedule.On a more serious note , this guy needs to be sued into bankruptcy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He clearly needs to sue the Sun for giving such a constant stream of high energy particles.
Then, of course, there's the galaxy, with those awful cosmic rays.
Hell, there's the blackbody radiation.I hope this guys has a lawyer with a pretty clear schedule.On a more serious note, this guy needs to be sued into bankruptcy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747926</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263414540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe the wifi is causing his body to change some protein being synthesized, leading to a protein that causes his body to react (or something similar)?</p><p>I say test it. It's silly to guess or pretend that we understand the biological processes of any body enough to say it's impossible...maybe unlikely, but not at all impossible. Of course, this is the basis of science, hypothesize and experiment, don't guess or assume. If it proves true, then that'll be *very* interesting. If it proves false, like I would blindly guess, then the radiation/EMF/(insert pseudo science here) absorbing crystal industry is going to plummet!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the wifi is causing his body to change some protein being synthesized , leading to a protein that causes his body to react ( or something similar ) ? I say test it .
It 's silly to guess or pretend that we understand the biological processes of any body enough to say it 's impossible...maybe unlikely , but not at all impossible .
Of course , this is the basis of science , hypothesize and experiment , do n't guess or assume .
If it proves true , then that 'll be * very * interesting .
If it proves false , like I would blindly guess , then the radiation/EMF/ ( insert pseudo science here ) absorbing crystal industry is going to plummet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the wifi is causing his body to change some protein being synthesized, leading to a protein that causes his body to react (or something similar)?I say test it.
It's silly to guess or pretend that we understand the biological processes of any body enough to say it's impossible...maybe unlikely, but not at all impossible.
Of course, this is the basis of science, hypothesize and experiment, don't guess or assume.
If it proves true, then that'll be *very* interesting.
If it proves false, like I would blindly guess, then the radiation/EMF/(insert pseudo science here) absorbing crystal industry is going to plummet!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745334</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>md65536</author>
	<datestamp>1263304080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If he can demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields...</p></div><p>I call bullshit on your idea of "fair".  You don't need to be able to detect something in order to be negatively affected by it.  If so, you could have made Erin Brokovich into a nobody.  "If the plaintiff could drink these 2 glasses of water and tell me which has toxic levels of hexavalent chromium, the court will consider this case."</p><p>Actually, I could probably prove that the average person could be subjected to lethal amounts of radiation without being able to detect it.  That doesn't mean they don't have a case.</p><p>How about instead, if he proves that he is suffering demonstrable effects from the type and levels of radiation being emitted by his neighbor?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If he can demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields...I call bullshit on your idea of " fair " .
You do n't need to be able to detect something in order to be negatively affected by it .
If so , you could have made Erin Brokovich into a nobody .
" If the plaintiff could drink these 2 glasses of water and tell me which has toxic levels of hexavalent chromium , the court will consider this case .
" Actually , I could probably prove that the average person could be subjected to lethal amounts of radiation without being able to detect it .
That does n't mean they do n't have a case.How about instead , if he proves that he is suffering demonstrable effects from the type and levels of radiation being emitted by his neighbor ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he can demonstrate his ability to detect electromagnetic fields...I call bullshit on your idea of "fair".
You don't need to be able to detect something in order to be negatively affected by it.
If so, you could have made Erin Brokovich into a nobody.
"If the plaintiff could drink these 2 glasses of water and tell me which has toxic levels of hexavalent chromium, the court will consider this case.
"Actually, I could probably prove that the average person could be subjected to lethal amounts of radiation without being able to detect it.
That doesn't mean they don't have a case.How about instead, if he proves that he is suffering demonstrable effects from the type and levels of radiation being emitted by his neighbor?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744570</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1263299760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hear recently emptied caves in Afghanistan are pretty quiet EM wise with the exception of the occasional CIA listening device...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear recently emptied caves in Afghanistan are pretty quiet EM wise with the exception of the occasional CIA listening device.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear recently emptied caves in Afghanistan are pretty quiet EM wise with the exception of the occasional CIA listening device...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744798</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263300960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I have an alergy to sunlight, usually when emerging from a dark room into bright sunlight my eyes water, my nose goes ichy and I sneeze sometimes. It lasts a few minutes until my eyes adjust. I always thought this was a natural normal reaction and thought nothing of it, indeed it makes sense that your eyes water in bright light. But no, when I mentioned to a professional, apparently it's common but not normal and has been diagnosed as an alergy.</p></div></blockquote><p>Bee Ess.<br>Sensitivity to sunlight is NOT an allergy. An allergy is a disorder of the immune system. A physiological response to physical stimulation is not an immune reaction, it's a physiological reaction.</p><p>If we redefined allergy to include that, then it would lose all meaning. E.g., Everyone would be allergic to being punched in the nose because it made your eyes water. It may even make you cry like a girl.</p><blockquote><div><p>"Indeed there are people who can die from an alergic reaction to UV light.</p></div> </blockquote><p>It's called "melanoma". It, too, is not an alergic reaction.</p><blockquote><div><p>Yet it's plausible that people are alergic to EMF, it's certainly established that people can be alergic to parts of the EM spectrum.</p></div></blockquote><p>No. QED.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an alergy to sunlight , usually when emerging from a dark room into bright sunlight my eyes water , my nose goes ichy and I sneeze sometimes .
It lasts a few minutes until my eyes adjust .
I always thought this was a natural normal reaction and thought nothing of it , indeed it makes sense that your eyes water in bright light .
But no , when I mentioned to a professional , apparently it 's common but not normal and has been diagnosed as an alergy.Bee Ess.Sensitivity to sunlight is NOT an allergy .
An allergy is a disorder of the immune system .
A physiological response to physical stimulation is not an immune reaction , it 's a physiological reaction.If we redefined allergy to include that , then it would lose all meaning .
E.g. , Everyone would be allergic to being punched in the nose because it made your eyes water .
It may even make you cry like a girl .
" Indeed there are people who can die from an alergic reaction to UV light .
It 's called " melanoma " .
It , too , is not an alergic reaction.Yet it 's plausible that people are alergic to EMF , it 's certainly established that people can be alergic to parts of the EM spectrum.No .
QED .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an alergy to sunlight, usually when emerging from a dark room into bright sunlight my eyes water, my nose goes ichy and I sneeze sometimes.
It lasts a few minutes until my eyes adjust.
I always thought this was a natural normal reaction and thought nothing of it, indeed it makes sense that your eyes water in bright light.
But no, when I mentioned to a professional, apparently it's common but not normal and has been diagnosed as an alergy.Bee Ess.Sensitivity to sunlight is NOT an allergy.
An allergy is a disorder of the immune system.
A physiological response to physical stimulation is not an immune reaction, it's a physiological reaction.If we redefined allergy to include that, then it would lose all meaning.
E.g., Everyone would be allergic to being punched in the nose because it made your eyes water.
It may even make you cry like a girl.
"Indeed there are people who can die from an alergic reaction to UV light.
It's called "melanoma".
It, too, is not an alergic reaction.Yet it's plausible that people are alergic to EMF, it's certainly established that people can be alergic to parts of the EM spectrum.No.
QED.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30748774</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1263384120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember a suit against God for an "act of God". IIRC it was dropped because the judge couldn't find a way to serve the defendent the citation, because "everywhere and nowhere" is no address for service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember a suit against God for an " act of God " .
IIRC it was dropped because the judge could n't find a way to serve the defendent the citation , because " everywhere and nowhere " is no address for service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember a suit against God for an "act of God".
IIRC it was dropped because the judge couldn't find a way to serve the defendent the citation, because "everywhere and nowhere" is no address for service.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745732</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747722</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>pslytely psycho</author>
	<datestamp>1263324300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No. You do not have an allergy to sunlight.  You have non-allergic rhinitis.  It is an exaggerated histamine response. Like getting a runny nose in the cold.

<a href="http://allergies.about.com/od/fa1/f/nasoocularrefle.htm" title="about.com" rel="nofollow">http://allergies.about.com/od/fa1/f/nasoocularrefle.htm</a> [about.com]

There is a condition commonly known as sun allergy, but it is not actually an allergy. Just an ultrasensitivity to UV radiation.

 <a href="http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec18/ch214/ch214c.html" title="merck.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec18/ch214/ch214c.html</a> [merck.com]

An allergy to sunlight is a myth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
You do not have an allergy to sunlight .
You have non-allergic rhinitis .
It is an exaggerated histamine response .
Like getting a runny nose in the cold .
http : //allergies.about.com/od/fa1/f/nasoocularrefle.htm [ about.com ] There is a condition commonly known as sun allergy , but it is not actually an allergy .
Just an ultrasensitivity to UV radiation .
http : //www.merck.com/mmhe/sec18/ch214/ch214c.html [ merck.com ] An allergy to sunlight is a myth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
You do not have an allergy to sunlight.
You have non-allergic rhinitis.
It is an exaggerated histamine response.
Like getting a runny nose in the cold.
http://allergies.about.com/od/fa1/f/nasoocularrefle.htm [about.com]

There is a condition commonly known as sun allergy, but it is not actually an allergy.
Just an ultrasensitivity to UV radiation.
http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec18/ch214/ch214c.html [merck.com]

An allergy to sunlight is a myth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30746028</id>
	<title>Re:Seems oddly like...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263308280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...not to mention that this "story" is buried a couple links deep through some heavy advertising and refers to a Santa Fe New Mexican article that doesn't appear to exist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...not to mention that this " story " is buried a couple links deep through some heavy advertising and refers to a Santa Fe New Mexican article that does n't appear to exist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...not to mention that this "story" is buried a couple links deep through some heavy advertising and refers to a Santa Fe New Mexican article that doesn't appear to exist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744560</id>
	<title>Re:Microwave Ovens? Cordless Phones?</title>
	<author>Daimanta</author>
	<datestamp>1263299700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"He clearly needs to sue the Sun for giving such a constant stream of high energy particles"</p><p>Yeah, imagine that the Sun would output harmful radiation. Wouldn't THAT be stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" He clearly needs to sue the Sun for giving such a constant stream of high energy particles " Yeah , imagine that the Sun would output harmful radiation .
Would n't THAT be stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"He clearly needs to sue the Sun for giving such a constant stream of high energy particles"Yeah, imagine that the Sun would output harmful radiation.
Wouldn't THAT be stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743802</id>
	<title>He will have a hard time proving his case</title>
	<author>presidenteloco</author>
	<datestamp>1263296040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can be sure that if any harmful link had been scientifically established to this point, even just on the<br>balance of probabilities, a class action lawyer would already be in there pursuing a billion dollar<br>case for the class of "neighbours of wi-fi basestations.</p><p>I'm still open minded about all this. I don't really think cell phone radiation is bad for me, but<br>I would move or protest if someone put up the cell transmitter on my roof.</p><p>And I ain't superstitious, but a black cat just crossed my path.</p><p>To the defendant: Make sure a judge hears the case, not a jury.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can be sure that if any harmful link had been scientifically established to this point , even just on thebalance of probabilities , a class action lawyer would already be in there pursuing a billion dollarcase for the class of " neighbours of wi-fi basestations.I 'm still open minded about all this .
I do n't really think cell phone radiation is bad for me , butI would move or protest if someone put up the cell transmitter on my roof.And I ai n't superstitious , but a black cat just crossed my path.To the defendant : Make sure a judge hears the case , not a jury .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can be sure that if any harmful link had been scientifically established to this point, even just on thebalance of probabilities, a class action lawyer would already be in there pursuing a billion dollarcase for the class of "neighbours of wi-fi basestations.I'm still open minded about all this.
I don't really think cell phone radiation is bad for me, butI would move or protest if someone put up the cell transmitter on my roof.And I ain't superstitious, but a black cat just crossed my path.To the defendant: Make sure a judge hears the case, not a jury.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743888</id>
	<title>Don't sue, get $1M instead...</title>
	<author>nweaver</author>
	<datestamp>1263296460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As has been mentioned by others, WiFi sensitivity should easily count for paranormal under the James Randi Educational Foundation's $1M paranormal prize. <a href="http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html" title="randi.org">http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html</a> [randi.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As has been mentioned by others , WiFi sensitivity should easily count for paranormal under the James Randi Educational Foundation 's $ 1M paranormal prize .
http : //www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html [ randi.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As has been mentioned by others, WiFi sensitivity should easily count for paranormal under the James Randi Educational Foundation's $1M paranormal prize.
http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html [randi.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745044</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263302520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Talking about retards...</p><p>That's right, John-boy. Bring it.</p><p>P.S. posting anonymously, for obvious reasons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Talking about retards...That 's right , John-boy .
Bring it.P.S .
posting anonymously , for obvious reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Talking about retards...That's right, John-boy.
Bring it.P.S.
posting anonymously, for obvious reasons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744568</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263299760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Using WiFi is totally legal and within the other home owners rights. Even if he has this alergy it isn't up to his neighbor to do anything about it.</p></div><p>Actually, the neighbor's router is undoubtedly a standard Part 15 device and under FCC rules it is not allowed to interfere with anything else.  For example, if my neighbors router was screwing up my amateur radio communication I could make him turn it off until he fixes the problem.  Would still be tricky though because I don't know how this specific instance would be handled ("brain" interference? heh).</p><p>Cell phone would be more tricky though because it's not a Part 15 device and is most likely operating within specifications.  Although he could probably force his neighbor to turn it off until the device can be verified to be working within its specification.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Using WiFi is totally legal and within the other home owners rights .
Even if he has this alergy it is n't up to his neighbor to do anything about it.Actually , the neighbor 's router is undoubtedly a standard Part 15 device and under FCC rules it is not allowed to interfere with anything else .
For example , if my neighbors router was screwing up my amateur radio communication I could make him turn it off until he fixes the problem .
Would still be tricky though because I do n't know how this specific instance would be handled ( " brain " interference ?
heh ) .Cell phone would be more tricky though because it 's not a Part 15 device and is most likely operating within specifications .
Although he could probably force his neighbor to turn it off until the device can be verified to be working within its specification .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using WiFi is totally legal and within the other home owners rights.
Even if he has this alergy it isn't up to his neighbor to do anything about it.Actually, the neighbor's router is undoubtedly a standard Part 15 device and under FCC rules it is not allowed to interfere with anything else.
For example, if my neighbors router was screwing up my amateur radio communication I could make him turn it off until he fixes the problem.
Would still be tricky though because I don't know how this specific instance would be handled ("brain" interference?
heh).Cell phone would be more tricky though because it's not a Part 15 device and is most likely operating within specifications.
Although he could probably force his neighbor to turn it off until the device can be verified to be working within its specification.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740</id>
	<title>Retard.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263295800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can't be "Allergic to wi-fi"</p><p>Put him in a room, and turn the wireless on and off.  Guaranteed he won't be able to tell the difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't be " Allergic to wi-fi " Put him in a room , and turn the wireless on and off .
Guaranteed he wo n't be able to tell the difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't be "Allergic to wi-fi"Put him in a room, and turn the wireless on and off.
Guaranteed he won't be able to tell the difference.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744340</id>
	<title>i'll half-assed troll this one</title>
	<author>ClintJCL</author>
	<datestamp>1263298560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can you demonstrate your ability to detect asbestos?
<p>
If not, it must not be harming you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you demonstrate your ability to detect asbestos ?
If not , it must not be harming you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you demonstrate your ability to detect asbestos?
If not, it must not be harming you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743868</id>
	<title>phobia</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1263296340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the neighbor's house was emitting dangerous levels of gamma radiation then the suit would definately have merit but this is a severe phobia not a physiological reaction to wifi "radiation."  There is zero evidence what so ever that anyone has any adverse reaction to wifi and even if there was. it would not be an "allergy."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the neighbor 's house was emitting dangerous levels of gamma radiation then the suit would definately have merit but this is a severe phobia not a physiological reaction to wifi " radiation .
" There is zero evidence what so ever that anyone has any adverse reaction to wifi and even if there was .
it would not be an " allergy .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the neighbor's house was emitting dangerous levels of gamma radiation then the suit would definately have merit but this is a severe phobia not a physiological reaction to wifi "radiation.
"  There is zero evidence what so ever that anyone has any adverse reaction to wifi and even if there was.
it would not be an "allergy.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744774</id>
	<title>Re:Seems oddly like...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263300840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes! A sample of size 1 was 100\% false! Therefore all similar claims are also false. lrn2statistics</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes !
A sample of size 1 was 100 \ % false !
Therefore all similar claims are also false .
lrn2statistics</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes!
A sample of size 1 was 100\% false!
Therefore all similar claims are also false.
lrn2statistics</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30748894</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>mlush</author>
	<datestamp>1263386160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><i>Speaking of light switches, all I can think of is the case of a cell phone company that put up a new tower, and all the <a href="http://angryflower.com/advan.html" title="angryflower.com" rel="nofollow">advanced</a> [angryflower.com] folks in the neighborhood by it complained that the tower was irritating their EM allergies and giving them headaches and whatnot.</i></p><p>The company's response to their complaints?  "Gee, we can only imagine how bad it's going to get when we actually turn the tower on!"</p></div><p>I'm not calling you out or anything,  but do you have any sort of cite for that story? Its a good story and a useful link to
have in the back pocket.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Speaking of light switches , all I can think of is the case of a cell phone company that put up a new tower , and all the advanced [ angryflower.com ] folks in the neighborhood by it complained that the tower was irritating their EM allergies and giving them headaches and whatnot.The company 's response to their complaints ?
" Gee , we can only imagine how bad it 's going to get when we actually turn the tower on !
" I 'm not calling you out or anything , but do you have any sort of cite for that story ?
Its a good story and a useful link to have in the back pocket .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Speaking of light switches, all I can think of is the case of a cell phone company that put up a new tower, and all the advanced [angryflower.com] folks in the neighborhood by it complained that the tower was irritating their EM allergies and giving them headaches and whatnot.The company's response to their complaints?
"Gee, we can only imagine how bad it's going to get when we actually turn the tower on!
"I'm not calling you out or anything,  but do you have any sort of cite for that story?
Its a good story and a useful link to
have in the back pocket.
:-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744984</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>BasilBrush</author>
	<datestamp>1263302160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Others have pointed out your reaction to light is not an allergy.  But even if it was...</p><blockquote><div><p>So how is it then that it is so implausible that someone might be alergic to wi-fi?</p></div></blockquote><p>Because while science documents that the body has receptors sensitive to light - most obviously the eyes, but also the skin - there are no receptors sensitive to radio spectrum EMR.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Others have pointed out your reaction to light is not an allergy .
But even if it was...So how is it then that it is so implausible that someone might be alergic to wi-fi ? Because while science documents that the body has receptors sensitive to light - most obviously the eyes , but also the skin - there are no receptors sensitive to radio spectrum EMR .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Others have pointed out your reaction to light is not an allergy.
But even if it was...So how is it then that it is so implausible that someone might be alergic to wi-fi?Because while science documents that the body has receptors sensitive to light - most obviously the eyes, but also the skin - there are no receptors sensitive to radio spectrum EMR.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743952</id>
	<title>Re:He will have a hard time proving his case</title>
	<author>Man On Pink Corner</author>
	<datestamp>1263296760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I'm still open minded about all this. I don't really think cell phone radiation is bad for me, but I would move or protest if someone put up the cell transmitter on my roof.</i></p><p>That's OK -- they can put one on my roof anytime they want.  It will be nice to have the carrier sending <i>me</i> money every month, for a change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm still open minded about all this .
I do n't really think cell phone radiation is bad for me , but I would move or protest if someone put up the cell transmitter on my roof.That 's OK -- they can put one on my roof anytime they want .
It will be nice to have the carrier sending me money every month , for a change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm still open minded about all this.
I don't really think cell phone radiation is bad for me, but I would move or protest if someone put up the cell transmitter on my roof.That's OK -- they can put one on my roof anytime they want.
It will be nice to have the carrier sending me money every month, for a change.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744142</id>
	<title>Re:Don't live there</title>
	<author>DMiax</author>
	<datestamp>1263297540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But his dog does not enter your house, right? and you expect your neighbour to ansure that he does not. So *if* (and it is a big if) wifi can be considered dangerous to this guy he can ask his neighbour to prevent EM waves from entering his house. Like, by covering the walls in metal.
</p><p>
More likely, if the currently harmless spectrum could be proven not harmless then a new one will be tested and allocated and old routers will be outlawed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But his dog does not enter your house , right ?
and you expect your neighbour to ansure that he does not .
So * if * ( and it is a big if ) wifi can be considered dangerous to this guy he can ask his neighbour to prevent EM waves from entering his house .
Like , by covering the walls in metal .
More likely , if the currently harmless spectrum could be proven not harmless then a new one will be tested and allocated and old routers will be outlawed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But his dog does not enter your house, right?
and you expect your neighbour to ansure that he does not.
So *if* (and it is a big if) wifi can be considered dangerous to this guy he can ask his neighbour to prevent EM waves from entering his house.
Like, by covering the walls in metal.
More likely, if the currently harmless spectrum could be proven not harmless then a new one will be tested and allocated and old routers will be outlawed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30749312</id>
	<title>Incoherent rambling</title>
	<author>iamweasel</author>
	<datestamp>1263390960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I watched a documentary of sorts about EM allergies. I found it quite funny that some of these people carried with them a meter that would tell them the level of EM radiation (reminded me of a dB meter) so they would know when to be anxious.</p><p>I imagine proving whether a person is really "allergic" to EM radiation on a frequency range would be very simple in a double blind test. Could it be the case that even if somebody does have reactions, and can prove it, no-one will believe it anyway?</p><p>Personally though, I think these people need help dealing with their irrational fears. Then again, it's really up to them to seek help, which is in turn unlikely because of all the attention they get because of their "affliction".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I watched a documentary of sorts about EM allergies .
I found it quite funny that some of these people carried with them a meter that would tell them the level of EM radiation ( reminded me of a dB meter ) so they would know when to be anxious.I imagine proving whether a person is really " allergic " to EM radiation on a frequency range would be very simple in a double blind test .
Could it be the case that even if somebody does have reactions , and can prove it , no-one will believe it anyway ? Personally though , I think these people need help dealing with their irrational fears .
Then again , it 's really up to them to seek help , which is in turn unlikely because of all the attention they get because of their " affliction " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I watched a documentary of sorts about EM allergies.
I found it quite funny that some of these people carried with them a meter that would tell them the level of EM radiation (reminded me of a dB meter) so they would know when to be anxious.I imagine proving whether a person is really "allergic" to EM radiation on a frequency range would be very simple in a double blind test.
Could it be the case that even if somebody does have reactions, and can prove it, no-one will believe it anyway?Personally though, I think these people need help dealing with their irrational fears.
Then again, it's really up to them to seek help, which is in turn unlikely because of all the attention they get because of their "affliction".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30759174</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>thtrgremlin</author>
	<datestamp>1263390480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001467.htm" title="nih.gov">http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001467.htm</a> [nih.gov]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001467.htm [ nih.gov ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001467.htm [nih.gov]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745406</id>
	<title>He needs to leave the planet</title>
	<author>tcampb01</author>
	<datestamp>1263304380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if he's aware that the Earth has a strong electromagnetic field.  Come to think of it... the Sun is probably wreaking havoc on his health too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if he 's aware that the Earth has a strong electromagnetic field .
Come to think of it... the Sun is probably wreaking havoc on his health too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if he's aware that the Earth has a strong electromagnetic field.
Come to think of it... the Sun is probably wreaking havoc on his health too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744436</id>
	<title>Re:litmus test</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263299100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If only it were that simple.  But it's not.  It never is.  There's really very little sense in testing him.  This man is convinced he is allergic, it's likely that no simple test will convince him he's wrong, only that the test is wrong.  For example, it might be a question of prolonged exposure.  Maybe it takes eight to ten weeks for his symptoms to manifest.  Will the court order that over the next few years, his neighbor randomly activate and de-activate his for months at a time?  Maybe it's an amalgamation of symptoms; he only gets his allergies when exposed to the wi-fi, the specific pollen of his neighborhood, and the sound of cars passing by.  Or, most probably, any administered test will simply be another part of the vast radio-wave cover-up by the government and big pharma. <br> <br>
I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying that there's no reason for the court to test.  We know it doesn't happen and we (probably) won't be able to convince him otherwise.  It's similar to people who think that every health issue you have can easily be explained by your diet ("Too many toxins!"), and yet still go to the doctor for a broken leg.   "Your eye is dry?  It's all those preservatives!"  Every health issue is a direct result of what chemicals you're putting into your body, except H1N1, that's different.  Oh, and AIDS.  Etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If only it were that simple .
But it 's not .
It never is .
There 's really very little sense in testing him .
This man is convinced he is allergic , it 's likely that no simple test will convince him he 's wrong , only that the test is wrong .
For example , it might be a question of prolonged exposure .
Maybe it takes eight to ten weeks for his symptoms to manifest .
Will the court order that over the next few years , his neighbor randomly activate and de-activate his for months at a time ?
Maybe it 's an amalgamation of symptoms ; he only gets his allergies when exposed to the wi-fi , the specific pollen of his neighborhood , and the sound of cars passing by .
Or , most probably , any administered test will simply be another part of the vast radio-wave cover-up by the government and big pharma .
I 'm not saying you 're wrong , I 'm just saying that there 's no reason for the court to test .
We know it does n't happen and we ( probably ) wo n't be able to convince him otherwise .
It 's similar to people who think that every health issue you have can easily be explained by your diet ( " Too many toxins !
" ) , and yet still go to the doctor for a broken leg .
" Your eye is dry ?
It 's all those preservatives !
" Every health issue is a direct result of what chemicals you 're putting into your body , except H1N1 , that 's different .
Oh , and AIDS .
Etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If only it were that simple.
But it's not.
It never is.
There's really very little sense in testing him.
This man is convinced he is allergic, it's likely that no simple test will convince him he's wrong, only that the test is wrong.
For example, it might be a question of prolonged exposure.
Maybe it takes eight to ten weeks for his symptoms to manifest.
Will the court order that over the next few years, his neighbor randomly activate and de-activate his for months at a time?
Maybe it's an amalgamation of symptoms; he only gets his allergies when exposed to the wi-fi, the specific pollen of his neighborhood, and the sound of cars passing by.
Or, most probably, any administered test will simply be another part of the vast radio-wave cover-up by the government and big pharma.
I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying that there's no reason for the court to test.
We know it doesn't happen and we (probably) won't be able to convince him otherwise.
It's similar to people who think that every health issue you have can easily be explained by your diet ("Too many toxins!
"), and yet still go to the doctor for a broken leg.
"Your eye is dry?
It's all those preservatives!
"  Every health issue is a direct result of what chemicals you're putting into your body, except H1N1, that's different.
Oh, and AIDS.
Etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745106</id>
	<title>Re:Microwave Ovens? Cordless Phones?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263302760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have heard of earth&rsquo;s magnetic shield have you? You intention is good, but your argument is lame.</p><p>If you are the lucky one who is right without having to argue, at least don&rsquo;t fuck it up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have heard of earth    s magnetic shield have you ?
You intention is good , but your argument is lame.If you are the lucky one who is right without having to argue , at least don    t fuck it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have heard of earth’s magnetic shield have you?
You intention is good, but your argument is lame.If you are the lucky one who is right without having to argue, at least don’t fuck it up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745602</id>
	<title>Re:Simple test...</title>
	<author>Grishnakh</author>
	<datestamp>1263305520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember being under a high-tension transmission line once as a kid, and every time I touched the pickup truck we had (standing on the ground), I got a huge shock.  It's been a long time so I don't know how accurate my memory is, but that's what I remember.  I remember it feeling a little weird under those lines.</p><p>With the kind of voltage those lines operate at, I don't think it's unreasonable to assume people might detect something from them.  Assuming the lines operate at 765kV, and they're 30 meters off the ground (just a guess there), that causes a voltage gradient of 25,500 volts per meter.  People are usually almost 2 meters tall, so that's about 50,000 volts difference between your head and the ground.  Of course, the air has a lot of resistance, but still you can see where I'm going with this.</p><p>No, a better test is to take the guy out to the country (away from power lines), and bring along a Wi-Fi router and a power inverter to power it from the vehicle.  Blindfold him and see if he can tell if it's turned on or not.  Use a long extension cord and put him and the router out in a field well away from the vehicle to be extra sure.  I'm quite sure he won't be able to detect that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember being under a high-tension transmission line once as a kid , and every time I touched the pickup truck we had ( standing on the ground ) , I got a huge shock .
It 's been a long time so I do n't know how accurate my memory is , but that 's what I remember .
I remember it feeling a little weird under those lines.With the kind of voltage those lines operate at , I do n't think it 's unreasonable to assume people might detect something from them .
Assuming the lines operate at 765kV , and they 're 30 meters off the ground ( just a guess there ) , that causes a voltage gradient of 25,500 volts per meter .
People are usually almost 2 meters tall , so that 's about 50,000 volts difference between your head and the ground .
Of course , the air has a lot of resistance , but still you can see where I 'm going with this.No , a better test is to take the guy out to the country ( away from power lines ) , and bring along a Wi-Fi router and a power inverter to power it from the vehicle .
Blindfold him and see if he can tell if it 's turned on or not .
Use a long extension cord and put him and the router out in a field well away from the vehicle to be extra sure .
I 'm quite sure he wo n't be able to detect that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember being under a high-tension transmission line once as a kid, and every time I touched the pickup truck we had (standing on the ground), I got a huge shock.
It's been a long time so I don't know how accurate my memory is, but that's what I remember.
I remember it feeling a little weird under those lines.With the kind of voltage those lines operate at, I don't think it's unreasonable to assume people might detect something from them.
Assuming the lines operate at 765kV, and they're 30 meters off the ground (just a guess there), that causes a voltage gradient of 25,500 volts per meter.
People are usually almost 2 meters tall, so that's about 50,000 volts difference between your head and the ground.
Of course, the air has a lot of resistance, but still you can see where I'm going with this.No, a better test is to take the guy out to the country (away from power lines), and bring along a Wi-Fi router and a power inverter to power it from the vehicle.
Blindfold him and see if he can tell if it's turned on or not.
Use a long extension cord and put him and the router out in a field well away from the vehicle to be extra sure.
I'm quite sure he won't be able to detect that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744520</id>
	<title>Re:Retard.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263299520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The key difference being that we have ample evidence to suggest people can be allergic to things (cats, peanuts, pollen, ect), but controlled attempts to prove that that electromagnetic sensitivity is real have turned up <a href="http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4072" title="skeptoid.com" rel="nofollow">flat.</a> [skeptoid.com]  ES is BS, or at the very least, it is a psychological thing, not a physiological condition.  This bears all the marks of the nonsensical woowoo ideas out there built upon anecdotal stories that real science can't confirm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The key difference being that we have ample evidence to suggest people can be allergic to things ( cats , peanuts , pollen , ect ) , but controlled attempts to prove that that electromagnetic sensitivity is real have turned up flat .
[ skeptoid.com ] ES is BS , or at the very least , it is a psychological thing , not a physiological condition .
This bears all the marks of the nonsensical woowoo ideas out there built upon anecdotal stories that real science ca n't confirm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The key difference being that we have ample evidence to suggest people can be allergic to things (cats, peanuts, pollen, ect), but controlled attempts to prove that that electromagnetic sensitivity is real have turned up flat.
[skeptoid.com]  ES is BS, or at the very least, it is a psychological thing, not a physiological condition.
This bears all the marks of the nonsensical woowoo ideas out there built upon anecdotal stories that real science can't confirm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30750834</id>
	<title>Re:I want to sue as well...</title>
	<author>MooseTick</author>
	<datestamp>1263399420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm ok with Wi-Fi signals as long as they are in the clear and open. When you start using WEP keys or some sort of encryption it makes me ill though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm ok with Wi-Fi signals as long as they are in the clear and open .
When you start using WEP keys or some sort of encryption it makes me ill though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm ok with Wi-Fi signals as long as they are in the clear and open.
When you start using WEP keys or some sort of encryption it makes me ill though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743826</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30746964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30755008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30756426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30755840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30755644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30749142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30750516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30751730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30759174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30748774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30750834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30746028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30748894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30749454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30751056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30758734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30750322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30746286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30748656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30746070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30750500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30753168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30748328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1743241_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30757646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30750834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30750500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30751056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747054
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747848
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30753168
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743850
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745732
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30748774
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747786
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744562
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30750322
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744040
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744786
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30748894
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745914
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30750516
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30758734
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744606
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744798
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747306
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30759174
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745974
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30748656
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744984
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747722
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744520
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745606
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744650
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745314
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30757646
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30755008
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747926
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30749454
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30749142
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30751730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30749312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747330
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30746028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744774
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30755840
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743888
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743832
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744604
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744906
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745106
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744560
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745192
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30746286
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745726
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30756426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30748328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744628
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30748226
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30746070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30755644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744086
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745320
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743914
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744478
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744568
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744766
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744714
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745394
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744570
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30746964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744220
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30743948
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30744306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30747656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1743241.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1743241.30745024
</commentlist>
</conversation>
