<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_11_1522212</id>
	<title>CES, Reporter Breaks "Unbreakable" Mobile Phone</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1263229380000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>ChiefMonkeyGrinder writes <i>"Reporter Dan Simmons from the BBC's technology show Click managed to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8450385.stm">break a mobile phone marketed as 'unbreakable'</a> (video), during a demonstration at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas."</i> The phone can survive a 10 story fall, being submerged 20 feet for 30 mins, and you can use it to hammer a nail; but it's no match for a British journalist.</htmltext>
<tokenext>ChiefMonkeyGrinder writes " Reporter Dan Simmons from the BBC 's technology show Click managed to break a mobile phone marketed as 'unbreakable ' ( video ) , during a demonstration at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas .
" The phone can survive a 10 story fall , being submerged 20 feet for 30 mins , and you can use it to hammer a nail ; but it 's no match for a British journalist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ChiefMonkeyGrinder writes "Reporter Dan Simmons from the BBC's technology show Click managed to break a mobile phone marketed as 'unbreakable' (video), during a demonstration at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.
" The phone can survive a 10 story fall, being submerged 20 feet for 30 mins, and you can use it to hammer a nail; but it's no match for a British journalist.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30730874</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>F34nor</author>
	<datestamp>1263213420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I found it odd that the NPR reporter didn't ask Brain if he thought that being owned by the larges military contractor in the world doesn't effect how they report on politics or military spending.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I found it odd that the NPR reporter did n't ask Brain if he thought that being owned by the larges military contractor in the world does n't effect how they report on politics or military spending .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I found it odd that the NPR reporter didn't ask Brain if he thought that being owned by the larges military contractor in the world doesn't effect how they report on politics or military spending.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724844</id>
	<title>yeah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263233400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but is it unblendable?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but is it unblendable ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but is it unblendable?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724820</id>
	<title>Happens to the best of us!</title>
	<author>pasm</author>
	<datestamp>1263233340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Demo dyndrome is alive and well!<br>

I am sure nearly all of us knows how he feels.<br>

I remember when Oracle was unbreakable. Surely it is computing taboo to use this description<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Demo dyndrome is alive and well !
I am sure nearly all of us knows how he feels .
I remember when Oracle was unbreakable .
Surely it is computing taboo to use this description : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Demo dyndrome is alive and well!
I am sure nearly all of us knows how he feels.
I remember when Oracle was unbreakable.
Surely it is computing taboo to use this description :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726298</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1263239640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love Jon Stewart, he's funny as hell.</p><p>However, just because he picks someone apart doesn't really make any difference in the quality of the news presented by that person.</p><p>I regularly pick apart the points that Stewart makes.  He leaves out context and other things that have subtle but important meaning in the context of the clip in order to make it funny.</p><p>Thats fine, I know what he's doing.</p><p>What bothers me is that people like yourself seem to take his implications as fact without considering the rest of the situation.</p><p>The point he implies is almost always truthful and a valid point, but when you put most of the stuff he does in context, its not nearly as insane as he makes it out to be.</p><p>This is the difference between an intelligent educated person and most of the population of the planet.  Most people think that either Fox news or (all the others) are biased.</p><p>The problem is that most people are right.  Jon Stewart is biased, if you can't see that you're such a retarded fanboy that you need to be terminated immediately.  Of course, Stewart is in no way unique.  The morons who say 'Oh will its Fox news they are biased!' or 'Oh its CNN they are biased' are just that, morons too stupid to realize that its not that XXX news is biased, its that EVERYONE IS FREAKING BIASED TO THEIR OWN BELIEFS and it takes a conscious effort to look beyond your bias and try to understand the point of view of the other side, which, even when you don't think you agree, 9 times out of 10 what the other side is saying has merit and shouldn't be totally written off even if you don't disagree with everything it says.</p><p>There is no excuse for being ignorant in this respect, if you're too stupid to realize 'your political party' or 'your news channel' isn't just as fucked up as the other side, you deserve the ass raping your get because you're an ignorant fanboy who doesn't deserve freedom, you aren't responsible enough to survive with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love Jon Stewart , he 's funny as hell.However , just because he picks someone apart does n't really make any difference in the quality of the news presented by that person.I regularly pick apart the points that Stewart makes .
He leaves out context and other things that have subtle but important meaning in the context of the clip in order to make it funny.Thats fine , I know what he 's doing.What bothers me is that people like yourself seem to take his implications as fact without considering the rest of the situation.The point he implies is almost always truthful and a valid point , but when you put most of the stuff he does in context , its not nearly as insane as he makes it out to be.This is the difference between an intelligent educated person and most of the population of the planet .
Most people think that either Fox news or ( all the others ) are biased.The problem is that most people are right .
Jon Stewart is biased , if you ca n't see that you 're such a retarded fanboy that you need to be terminated immediately .
Of course , Stewart is in no way unique .
The morons who say 'Oh will its Fox news they are biased !
' or 'Oh its CNN they are biased ' are just that , morons too stupid to realize that its not that XXX news is biased , its that EVERYONE IS FREAKING BIASED TO THEIR OWN BELIEFS and it takes a conscious effort to look beyond your bias and try to understand the point of view of the other side , which , even when you do n't think you agree , 9 times out of 10 what the other side is saying has merit and should n't be totally written off even if you do n't disagree with everything it says.There is no excuse for being ignorant in this respect , if you 're too stupid to realize 'your political party ' or 'your news channel ' is n't just as fucked up as the other side , you deserve the ass raping your get because you 're an ignorant fanboy who does n't deserve freedom , you are n't responsible enough to survive with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love Jon Stewart, he's funny as hell.However, just because he picks someone apart doesn't really make any difference in the quality of the news presented by that person.I regularly pick apart the points that Stewart makes.
He leaves out context and other things that have subtle but important meaning in the context of the clip in order to make it funny.Thats fine, I know what he's doing.What bothers me is that people like yourself seem to take his implications as fact without considering the rest of the situation.The point he implies is almost always truthful and a valid point, but when you put most of the stuff he does in context, its not nearly as insane as he makes it out to be.This is the difference between an intelligent educated person and most of the population of the planet.
Most people think that either Fox news or (all the others) are biased.The problem is that most people are right.
Jon Stewart is biased, if you can't see that you're such a retarded fanboy that you need to be terminated immediately.
Of course, Stewart is in no way unique.
The morons who say 'Oh will its Fox news they are biased!
' or 'Oh its CNN they are biased' are just that, morons too stupid to realize that its not that XXX news is biased, its that EVERYONE IS FREAKING BIASED TO THEIR OWN BELIEFS and it takes a conscious effort to look beyond your bias and try to understand the point of view of the other side, which, even when you don't think you agree, 9 times out of 10 what the other side is saying has merit and shouldn't be totally written off even if you don't disagree with everything it says.There is no excuse for being ignorant in this respect, if you're too stupid to realize 'your political party' or 'your news channel' isn't just as fucked up as the other side, you deserve the ass raping your get because you're an ignorant fanboy who doesn't deserve freedom, you aren't responsible enough to survive with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725406</id>
	<title>I love the rep's reaction though</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1263235440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Instead of being shocked or dismayed, he actually laughs at it. That is, to me, the best possible way he could react. The only thing that could have made it better, would have been if he had said something like "well, you've just earned yourself a new phone".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of being shocked or dismayed , he actually laughs at it .
That is , to me , the best possible way he could react .
The only thing that could have made it better , would have been if he had said something like " well , you 've just earned yourself a new phone " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of being shocked or dismayed, he actually laughs at it.
That is, to me, the best possible way he could react.
The only thing that could have made it better, would have been if he had said something like "well, you've just earned yourself a new phone".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725308</id>
	<title>Stiff Upper Lip, You Insensitive Clod</title>
	<author>wsanders</author>
	<datestamp>1263235080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because Brits have a Stiff Upper Lip. Great for breaking phones, summers where it never gets above 50, and attempting to conquer places like Afghanistan and India.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because Brits have a Stiff Upper Lip .
Great for breaking phones , summers where it never gets above 50 , and attempting to conquer places like Afghanistan and India .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because Brits have a Stiff Upper Lip.
Great for breaking phones, summers where it never gets above 50, and attempting to conquer places like Afghanistan and India.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726240</id>
	<title>Off-topic but noteworthy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263239340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Volume on the BBC Video player still "goes to eleven."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Volume on the BBC Video player still " goes to eleven .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Volume on the BBC Video player still "goes to eleven.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727432</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>Verdatum</author>
	<datestamp>1263243300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I didn't expect some kind of British journalist!"</p><p>*danger chord* "Nobody expects the British journalists!  Our chief weapon is surprise!!"</p><p>and so forth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I did n't expect some kind of British journalist !
" * danger chord * " Nobody expects the British journalists !
Our chief weapon is surprise ! !
" and so forth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I didn't expect some kind of British journalist!
"*danger chord* "Nobody expects the British journalists!
Our chief weapon is surprise!!
"and so forth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725486</id>
	<title>Is the a challenge?</title>
	<author>jgtg32a</author>
	<datestamp>1263235740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just say that it is tough not unbreakable</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just say that it is tough not unbreakable</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just say that it is tough not unbreakable</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727522</id>
	<title>But Will it Blend... with a Blendtek Blender?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263200400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But Will it Blend... with a Blendtek Blender?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But Will it Blend... with a Blendtek Blender ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But Will it Blend... with a Blendtek Blender?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726218</id>
	<title>Why bother breaking it?</title>
	<author>dvoecks</author>
	<datestamp>1263239280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are there really that many people who go actually take the term "unbreakable" literally and need to be protected from "blatant false advertising"?  Personally, I just mentally translate it to "really tough to break accidentally".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are there really that many people who go actually take the term " unbreakable " literally and need to be protected from " blatant false advertising " ?
Personally , I just mentally translate it to " really tough to break accidentally " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are there really that many people who go actually take the term "unbreakable" literally and need to be protected from "blatant false advertising"?
Personally, I just mentally translate it to "really tough to break accidentally".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724886</id>
	<title>Screens are weak</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263233520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Screens are always the weak point of a phone.    I would surprised if any lcd screen can withstand a direct contact with only the screen (generally by corners or pointy objects).   Thet have the drop issue solved because they assume the casing will absorb the shock on a flat surface.
</p><p>
Working for a phone manufacturer it took us month of back and forth with the LCD manufacturer and reinforcing plastic to make our phone's LCD not break from a 1.5 meter drop.   So 10 stories is impressive!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Screens are always the weak point of a phone .
I would surprised if any lcd screen can withstand a direct contact with only the screen ( generally by corners or pointy objects ) .
Thet have the drop issue solved because they assume the casing will absorb the shock on a flat surface .
Working for a phone manufacturer it took us month of back and forth with the LCD manufacturer and reinforcing plastic to make our phone 's LCD not break from a 1.5 meter drop .
So 10 stories is impressive !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screens are always the weak point of a phone.
I would surprised if any lcd screen can withstand a direct contact with only the screen (generally by corners or pointy objects).
Thet have the drop issue solved because they assume the casing will absorb the shock on a flat surface.
Working for a phone manufacturer it took us month of back and forth with the LCD manufacturer and reinforcing plastic to make our phone's LCD not break from a 1.5 meter drop.
So 10 stories is impressive!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725980</id>
	<title>And "mailman"</title>
	<author>BetterSense</author>
	<datestamp>1263238140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Which is why I'm always careful to say "mailman or femailman"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is why I 'm always careful to say " mailman or femailman "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is why I'm always careful to say "mailman or femailman"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725388</id>
	<title>Wooaw...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263235380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>BBC just got famous... in limelight... NASDAQ skyrocketing... amazing work!!!</p><p>--ssk</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BBC just got famous... in limelight... NASDAQ skyrocketing... amazing work ! !
! --ssk</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BBC just got famous... in limelight... NASDAQ skyrocketing... amazing work!!
!--ssk</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726932</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263241920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too lazy to log in.... *yawn*</p><p>ANYWAYS,  I recall watching B.Williams mention on-air that the news staff looks at what they've written through a "stewart filter" or similar.  Basically, is what they broadcast mockable by the Daily Show?  If so, they are not doing justice to journalism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too lazy to log in.... * yawn * ANYWAYS , I recall watching B.Williams mention on-air that the news staff looks at what they 've written through a " stewart filter " or similar .
Basically , is what they broadcast mockable by the Daily Show ?
If so , they are not doing justice to journalism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too lazy to log in.... *yawn*ANYWAYS,  I recall watching B.Williams mention on-air that the news staff looks at what they've written through a "stewart filter" or similar.
Basically, is what they broadcast mockable by the Daily Show?
If so, they are not doing justice to journalism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725340</id>
	<title>so, uh...does it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263235200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>blend?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>blend ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>blend?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726884</id>
	<title>Re:More like patriotism... which is the same thing</title>
	<author>mjwalshe</author>
	<datestamp>1263241680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>maybe he was an ex Squaddie they can break anything</htmltext>
<tokenext>maybe he was an ex Squaddie they can break anything</tokentext>
<sentencetext>maybe he was an ex Squaddie they can break anything</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726286</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>MikeBabcock</author>
	<datestamp>1263239580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Court jesters have often played the role of pointing out the poignant truths around them with just enough humour to avoid being hung for noticing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Court jesters have often played the role of pointing out the poignant truths around them with just enough humour to avoid being hung for noticing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Court jesters have often played the role of pointing out the poignant truths around them with just enough humour to avoid being hung for noticing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726316</id>
	<title>Heh not too tough</title>
	<author>zmollusc</author>
	<datestamp>1263239640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hehe, my friend has one of these phones and broke it in the first week by using a compressed air line to blow dust and crap off it. The external speaker thing broke, so now it has no ring tone and he has to use vibrate. The earphone and the mic survived so it is ok to make calls. Don't knowif it is no longer waterproof.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hehe , my friend has one of these phones and broke it in the first week by using a compressed air line to blow dust and crap off it .
The external speaker thing broke , so now it has no ring tone and he has to use vibrate .
The earphone and the mic survived so it is ok to make calls .
Do n't knowif it is no longer waterproof .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hehe, my friend has one of these phones and broke it in the first week by using a compressed air line to blow dust and crap off it.
The external speaker thing broke, so now it has no ring tone and he has to use vibrate.
The earphone and the mic survived so it is ok to make calls.
Don't knowif it is no longer waterproof.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726710</id>
	<title>Re:Really now?</title>
	<author>aicrules</author>
	<datestamp>1263241200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're telling me there is a page 2 to slashdot?  And all this time I've only been reading page 1!?!?  I quit!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're telling me there is a page 2 to slashdot ?
And all this time I 've only been reading page 1 ! ? ! ?
I quit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're telling me there is a page 2 to slashdot?
And all this time I've only been reading page 1!?!?
I quit!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724808</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263233340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You sound like those crazy sociology professors who get pissed at words like "manhole" and "mankind." It's part of the presentation style, relax.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You sound like those crazy sociology professors who get pissed at words like " manhole " and " mankind .
" It 's part of the presentation style , relax .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You sound like those crazy sociology professors who get pissed at words like "manhole" and "mankind.
" It's part of the presentation style, relax.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725708</id>
	<title>Did the same thing at Comdex once</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263236760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was covering Comdex around 2001 for sysopt.com and earthweb.com, and we came across a handheld rugged MID running Win CE.  The sales guy talked about how you could do anything you wanted to it, and I pointed at the 5" LCD, and said something like, "There's no way that would stand up to a rock, though."</p><p>He claimed it would and proceeded to punch the screen hard... and it completely shattered.  We later inferred that his wedding ring made direct contact, adding to the force.</p><p>Lesson learned:  It's not truly rugged until the front of the LCD can take the brunt of whatever force you want.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was covering Comdex around 2001 for sysopt.com and earthweb.com , and we came across a handheld rugged MID running Win CE .
The sales guy talked about how you could do anything you wanted to it , and I pointed at the 5 " LCD , and said something like , " There 's no way that would stand up to a rock , though .
" He claimed it would and proceeded to punch the screen hard... and it completely shattered .
We later inferred that his wedding ring made direct contact , adding to the force.Lesson learned : It 's not truly rugged until the front of the LCD can take the brunt of whatever force you want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was covering Comdex around 2001 for sysopt.com and earthweb.com, and we came across a handheld rugged MID running Win CE.
The sales guy talked about how you could do anything you wanted to it, and I pointed at the 5" LCD, and said something like, "There's no way that would stand up to a rock, though.
"He claimed it would and proceeded to punch the screen hard... and it completely shattered.
We later inferred that his wedding ring made direct contact, adding to the force.Lesson learned:  It's not truly rugged until the front of the LCD can take the brunt of whatever force you want.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725068</id>
	<title>Wrong summary</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1263234180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Shrike broke it. Reporter Dan Simmons included that scene in the next Hyperion book.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Shrike broke it .
Reporter Dan Simmons included that scene in the next Hyperion book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Shrike broke it.
Reporter Dan Simmons included that scene in the next Hyperion book.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726692</id>
	<title>Re:Unbreakable???</title>
	<author>Shotgun</author>
	<datestamp>1263241200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That lawsuit was so bogus.  It's a "story" not reality.  It just makes you feel like the movie is never going to end.  On that, they succeeded.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That lawsuit was so bogus .
It 's a " story " not reality .
It just makes you feel like the movie is never going to end .
On that , they succeeded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That lawsuit was so bogus.
It's a "story" not reality.
It just makes you feel like the movie is never going to end.
On that, they succeeded.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30741188</id>
	<title>Re:Off-topic but noteworthy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263326820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course... otherwise, when an ad says to watch something "Tonight at 11," the people would get confused....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course... otherwise , when an ad says to watch something " Tonight at 11 , " the people would get confused... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course... otherwise, when an ad says to watch something "Tonight at 11," the people would get confused....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729048</id>
	<title>Re:Unbreakable???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263205680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't believe no one recognized the Lionel Hutz quote.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe no one recognized the Lionel Hutz quote .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe no one recognized the Lionel Hutz quote.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725632</id>
	<title>This has got to be illegal</title>
	<author>mtrachtenberg</author>
	<datestamp>1263236460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This reporter (an alien no less) is interfering with a cell phone company's ability to profit from its invention.</p><p>Call Homeland Security!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This reporter ( an alien no less ) is interfering with a cell phone company 's ability to profit from its invention.Call Homeland Security !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This reporter (an alien no less) is interfering with a cell phone company's ability to profit from its invention.Call Homeland Security!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727734</id>
	<title>Re:Spoiler:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263201000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>To be fair, it takes him a few solid whallops before it does break, and the rep doesn't look the least bit concerned until it actually snaps.</p></div><p>Four pretty good whacks of a hard angled point againt the same spot on the screen surface before it breaks.  I'd say it'd be pretty safe in most environments if you're not doing something stupid.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair , it takes him a few solid whallops before it does break , and the rep does n't look the least bit concerned until it actually snaps.Four pretty good whacks of a hard angled point againt the same spot on the screen surface before it breaks .
I 'd say it 'd be pretty safe in most environments if you 're not doing something stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair, it takes him a few solid whallops before it does break, and the rep doesn't look the least bit concerned until it actually snaps.Four pretty good whacks of a hard angled point againt the same spot on the screen surface before it breaks.
I'd say it'd be pretty safe in most environments if you're not doing something stupid.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724914</id>
	<title>More like patriotism... which is the same thing,,,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263233640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TFA is from BBC, journalist is British and it is a form of national pride.<br>"Brits can do the undoable, break the unbreakable."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA is from BBC , journalist is British and it is a form of national pride .
" Brits can do the undoable , break the unbreakable .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA is from BBC, journalist is British and it is a form of national pride.
"Brits can do the undoable, break the unbreakable.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724874</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263233520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He broke it by smiling a big, open mouth smile at it. Hence why his being British is key to understanding the incident.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He broke it by smiling a big , open mouth smile at it .
Hence why his being British is key to understanding the incident .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He broke it by smiling a big, open mouth smile at it.
Hence why his being British is key to understanding the incident.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726688</id>
	<title>Re:Always the screen</title>
	<author>PeterM from Berkeley</author>
	<datestamp>1263241140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think polycrystalline diamond is insanely strong as well as being insanely hard.<br>There's always sapphire, too, which can be made into very hard windows, but I don't know about their shatter resistance.</p><p>--PM</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think polycrystalline diamond is insanely strong as well as being insanely hard.There 's always sapphire , too , which can be made into very hard windows , but I do n't know about their shatter resistance.--PM</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think polycrystalline diamond is insanely strong as well as being insanely hard.There's always sapphire, too, which can be made into very hard windows, but I don't know about their shatter resistance.--PM</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725376</id>
	<title>The British Empire</title>
	<author>el3mentary</author>
	<datestamp>1263235320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Breaking other peoples stuff since 1583!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Breaking other peoples stuff since 1583 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Breaking other peoples stuff since 1583!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725240</id>
	<title>Will it blend?</title>
	<author>Pointy\_Hair</author>
	<datestamp>1263234840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.blendtec.com/willitblend/" title="blendtec.com">Will it blend?</a> [blendtec.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it blend ?
[ blendtec.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it blend?
[blendtec.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724976</id>
	<title>Re:Spoiler:</title>
	<author>Ksevio</author>
	<datestamp>1263233880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a bit funny just how fast he breaks it.  The CEO seems a bit surprised how the guy whacks at it for a few seconds and breaks it that easily.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a bit funny just how fast he breaks it .
The CEO seems a bit surprised how the guy whacks at it for a few seconds and breaks it that easily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a bit funny just how fast he breaks it.
The CEO seems a bit surprised how the guy whacks at it for a few seconds and breaks it that easily.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30728904</id>
	<title>Re:Reminds me of the Nextel "military spec" phones</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263205140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Our Nextel rep tried to sell us on some of their rubber-encased, bulky "ruggedized" phones last year, bragging about how they met U.S. military specifications and so on.  We tried out a few, and one of the maintenance guys out in the shop managed to break the "push to talk" button on his the first day he had it.  A couple others developed keypad failures in a matter of months.</p><p>The fact is, the cellphone makers come up with these claims based on very specific types of "accidents", such as the phone's ability to survive submerging in water to a certain depth, or surviving a drop from X number of feet.  In the real world, people find MANY other ways to break these devices that weren't even investigated.  (The guys in our shop do a lot of grinding and cutting of steel, for example.  Eventually, the little metal filings find their way into the cellphone's speaker, where the magnet in the speaker causes them to collect up - until they make a big enough pile to short things out.  When disassembling "dead" phones, we've found that a number of times.  But I haven't seen a single cellphone maker take any steps in their design to prevent THAT mode of failure.</p></div><p>Casio's Gz'One is supposedly dust proof.  I work in a metal fabrication shop myself, and aside from a few scratches and dings on the casing, it still works great after 2 years.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Our Nextel rep tried to sell us on some of their rubber-encased , bulky " ruggedized " phones last year , bragging about how they met U.S. military specifications and so on .
We tried out a few , and one of the maintenance guys out in the shop managed to break the " push to talk " button on his the first day he had it .
A couple others developed keypad failures in a matter of months.The fact is , the cellphone makers come up with these claims based on very specific types of " accidents " , such as the phone 's ability to survive submerging in water to a certain depth , or surviving a drop from X number of feet .
In the real world , people find MANY other ways to break these devices that were n't even investigated .
( The guys in our shop do a lot of grinding and cutting of steel , for example .
Eventually , the little metal filings find their way into the cellphone 's speaker , where the magnet in the speaker causes them to collect up - until they make a big enough pile to short things out .
When disassembling " dead " phones , we 've found that a number of times .
But I have n't seen a single cellphone maker take any steps in their design to prevent THAT mode of failure.Casio 's Gz'One is supposedly dust proof .
I work in a metal fabrication shop myself , and aside from a few scratches and dings on the casing , it still works great after 2 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our Nextel rep tried to sell us on some of their rubber-encased, bulky "ruggedized" phones last year, bragging about how they met U.S. military specifications and so on.
We tried out a few, and one of the maintenance guys out in the shop managed to break the "push to talk" button on his the first day he had it.
A couple others developed keypad failures in a matter of months.The fact is, the cellphone makers come up with these claims based on very specific types of "accidents", such as the phone's ability to survive submerging in water to a certain depth, or surviving a drop from X number of feet.
In the real world, people find MANY other ways to break these devices that weren't even investigated.
(The guys in our shop do a lot of grinding and cutting of steel, for example.
Eventually, the little metal filings find their way into the cellphone's speaker, where the magnet in the speaker causes them to collect up - until they make a big enough pile to short things out.
When disassembling "dead" phones, we've found that a number of times.
But I haven't seen a single cellphone maker take any steps in their design to prevent THAT mode of failure.Casio's Gz'One is supposedly dust proof.
I work in a metal fabrication shop myself, and aside from a few scratches and dings on the casing, it still works great after 2 years.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30730880</id>
	<title>Re:Unbreakable???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263213420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about the movie <em>Unbreakable</em>?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about the movie Unbreakable ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about the movie Unbreakable?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725790</id>
	<title>Will it blend?</title>
	<author>flyingfsck</author>
	<datestamp>1263237060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is the question...</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is the question.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is the question...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727860</id>
	<title>Build an idiot proof device...</title>
	<author>Arimus</author>
	<datestamp>1263201420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and they'll just build a better class of idiot.</p><p>Not that the journalist is an idiot but its the same principle. Make something indestructible and they'll just come up with a new way of destroying it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and they 'll just build a better class of idiot.Not that the journalist is an idiot but its the same principle .
Make something indestructible and they 'll just come up with a new way of destroying it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and they'll just build a better class of idiot.Not that the journalist is an idiot but its the same principle.
Make something indestructible and they'll just come up with a new way of destroying it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726084</id>
	<title>Re:Always the screen</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1263238680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You mean like this transparent aluminum (oxide)?</p></div><p>Ah that's the cheap aluminum oxide stuff stuff.  You want this "AlON" oxynitride stuff:</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium\_oxynitride" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium\_oxynitride</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>A mere $15 per sq inch.  Probably affordable for typical 1 sq inch cell phone screens.</p><p>"It is currently the crucial outer layer of experimental transparent armor being considered by the US Air Force for the windows of armored vehicles."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean like this transparent aluminum ( oxide ) ? Ah that 's the cheap aluminum oxide stuff stuff .
You want this " AlON " oxynitride stuff : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium \ _oxynitride [ wikipedia.org ] A mere $ 15 per sq inch .
Probably affordable for typical 1 sq inch cell phone screens .
" It is currently the crucial outer layer of experimental transparent armor being considered by the US Air Force for the windows of armored vehicles .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean like this transparent aluminum (oxide)?Ah that's the cheap aluminum oxide stuff stuff.
You want this "AlON" oxynitride stuff:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium\_oxynitride [wikipedia.org]A mere $15 per sq inch.
Probably affordable for typical 1 sq inch cell phone screens.
"It is currently the crucial outer layer of experimental transparent armor being considered by the US Air Force for the windows of armored vehicles.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726480</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263240240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I found it odd yet telling that keeping anchors in check is not regulated by role models today but rather the court jester.  Indeed, my opinions of both Fox News and CNN have dropped significantly from watching a few shows of Stewarts where he systematically picks apart their idiocy with a montage or just pointing out the obvious.  It's like an MST3K recap of the day's news<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... except with a bizarre twist: the truth.</p></div><p>I wonder what it says about our society when it so closely resembles a Shakespearean comedy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I found it odd yet telling that keeping anchors in check is not regulated by role models today but rather the court jester .
Indeed , my opinions of both Fox News and CNN have dropped significantly from watching a few shows of Stewarts where he systematically picks apart their idiocy with a montage or just pointing out the obvious .
It 's like an MST3K recap of the day 's news ... except with a bizarre twist : the truth.I wonder what it says about our society when it so closely resembles a Shakespearean comedy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I found it odd yet telling that keeping anchors in check is not regulated by role models today but rather the court jester.
Indeed, my opinions of both Fox News and CNN have dropped significantly from watching a few shows of Stewarts where he systematically picks apart their idiocy with a montage or just pointing out the obvious.
It's like an MST3K recap of the day's news ... except with a bizarre twist: the truth.I wonder what it says about our society when it so closely resembles a Shakespearean comedy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725208</id>
	<title>Unbreakable???</title>
	<author>ewenix</author>
	<datestamp>1263234720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is the most blatant false advertising since my lawsuit against the movie, The Neverending Story.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is the most blatant false advertising since my lawsuit against the movie , The Neverending Story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is the most blatant false advertising since my lawsuit against the movie, The Neverending Story.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727180</id>
	<title>Re:Spoiler:</title>
	<author>Guysmiley777</author>
	<datestamp>1263242640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IIRC the screen of that phone is actually made of <a href="http://www.corning.com/gorillaglass/index.aspx" title="corning.com">Gorilla Glass</a> [corning.com], which is pretty impressively tough stuff. Obviously not tough enough for British journalists mixed with a sharp metal corner...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IIRC the screen of that phone is actually made of Gorilla Glass [ corning.com ] , which is pretty impressively tough stuff .
Obviously not tough enough for British journalists mixed with a sharp metal corner.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IIRC the screen of that phone is actually made of Gorilla Glass [corning.com], which is pretty impressively tough stuff.
Obviously not tough enough for British journalists mixed with a sharp metal corner...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725712</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263236760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hereby suggest "but it's no match for a British journalist" as a new catchphrase.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hereby suggest " but it 's no match for a British journalist " as a new catchphrase .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hereby suggest "but it's no match for a British journalist" as a new catchphrase.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727112</id>
	<title>Re:yeah</title>
	<author>PGOER</author>
	<datestamp>1263242460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am Bender. Please insert cell phone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am Bender .
Please insert cell phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am Bender.
Please insert cell phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729402</id>
	<title>Re:Always the screen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263206880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The key to breakage here being that when they said "You can hammer a nail with it!" they didn't mean, "You can hammer a nail with the screen"</p></div></blockquote><p>Yeah, the key to demonstration here being if they don't mean the screen of a cel, then don't say you can hammer a nail with it.</p><p>Sure the statement is technically true if there is any portion of the phone that can hammer a nail, but it is deliberately deceptive if that's the only portion and the product is specifically a ruggedized phone.</p><p>Hell, I can hammer nails with my old Mitsubishi. Being careful and using the butt, I can even<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/drive/ the nail I'm hammering on, given small nails and a fairly soft wood like spruce. Language is great that way. But given the context, these people deserve ridicule for their statement.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The key to breakage here being that when they said " You can hammer a nail with it !
" they did n't mean , " You can hammer a nail with the screen " Yeah , the key to demonstration here being if they do n't mean the screen of a cel , then do n't say you can hammer a nail with it.Sure the statement is technically true if there is any portion of the phone that can hammer a nail , but it is deliberately deceptive if that 's the only portion and the product is specifically a ruggedized phone.Hell , I can hammer nails with my old Mitsubishi .
Being careful and using the butt , I can even /drive/ the nail I 'm hammering on , given small nails and a fairly soft wood like spruce .
Language is great that way .
But given the context , these people deserve ridicule for their statement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The key to breakage here being that when they said "You can hammer a nail with it!
" they didn't mean, "You can hammer a nail with the screen"Yeah, the key to demonstration here being if they don't mean the screen of a cel, then don't say you can hammer a nail with it.Sure the statement is technically true if there is any portion of the phone that can hammer a nail, but it is deliberately deceptive if that's the only portion and the product is specifically a ruggedized phone.Hell, I can hammer nails with my old Mitsubishi.
Being careful and using the butt, I can even /drive/ the nail I'm hammering on, given small nails and a fairly soft wood like spruce.
Language is great that way.
But given the context, these people deserve ridicule for their statement.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725456</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>Himring</author>
	<datestamp>1263235620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And if the guy was a redneck from the south (i.e., the U.S.), he would have responded like the wwe fans in that south park episode....
<br> <br>
"He broke he's phone!"
<br> <br>
[rooster then crows]</htmltext>
<tokenext>And if the guy was a redneck from the south ( i.e. , the U.S. ) , he would have responded like the wwe fans in that south park episode... . " He broke he 's phone !
" [ rooster then crows ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if the guy was a redneck from the south (i.e., the U.S.), he would have responded like the wwe fans in that south park episode....
 
"He broke he's phone!
"
 
[rooster then crows]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725106</id>
	<title>Marketing lies exposed!!!!!!!!</title>
	<author>qoncept</author>
	<datestamp>1263234300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Extra, extra! HUGE NEWS!! Child opens child proof bottle!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Extra , extra !
HUGE NEWS ! !
Child opens child proof bottle !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Extra, extra!
HUGE NEWS!!
Child opens child proof bottle!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725514</id>
	<title>Surefire way to break the unbreakable</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1263235920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Give it to a 6 year old boy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Give it to a 6 year old boy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give it to a 6 year old boy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729304</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263206520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, that's a nice catchphrase, but it's no match for a British journalist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , that 's a nice catchphrase , but it 's no match for a British journalist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, that's a nice catchphrase, but it's no match for a British journalist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726872</id>
	<title>Re:Screens are weak</title>
	<author>daten</author>
	<datestamp>1263241680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's an article from 2007 about an LCD computer monitor that could <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/25/2125218" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">take a direct shot from a crossbow</a> [slashdot.org] without damage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's an article from 2007 about an LCD computer monitor that could take a direct shot from a crossbow [ slashdot.org ] without damage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's an article from 2007 about an LCD computer monitor that could take a direct shot from a crossbow [slashdot.org] without damage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725132</id>
	<title>First Post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263234420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">long time FreeBSD from the OpenBSD haapiness Another to survive at all on baby...don't themselves to be a fucking market of progrees. as one of the</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>long time FreeBSD from the OpenBSD haapiness Another to survive at all on baby...do n't themselves to be a fucking market of progrees .
as one of the [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>long time FreeBSD from the OpenBSD haapiness Another to survive at all on baby...don't themselves to be a fucking market of progrees.
as one of the [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726806</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>TheKidWho</author>
	<datestamp>1263241500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>John Stewart is good, but he's no match for a British journalist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>John Stewart is good , but he 's no match for a British journalist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>John Stewart is good, but he's no match for a British journalist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725226</id>
	<title>Really now?</title>
	<author>Xelios</author>
	<datestamp>1263234780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This was worthy of a front page post? I saw that video earlier, thought "heh" and moved on with my day. Is there really anything more to discuss here?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This was worthy of a front page post ?
I saw that video earlier , thought " heh " and moved on with my day .
Is there really anything more to discuss here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was worthy of a front page post?
I saw that video earlier, thought "heh" and moved on with my day.
Is there really anything more to discuss here?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722</id>
	<title>What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>TheKidWho</author>
	<datestamp>1263233040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What does the reporters nationality have anything to do with it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What does the reporters nationality have anything to do with it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does the reporters nationality have anything to do with it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725420</id>
	<title>Cracking</title>
	<author>Wowsers</author>
	<datestamp>1263235500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously rather than dipping the phone in water, it was put into a solution of sodium pentothal, and the phone barked "Enough of this torture, I'll give you the contacts list". And thus the phone was "broken."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously rather than dipping the phone in water , it was put into a solution of sodium pentothal , and the phone barked " Enough of this torture , I 'll give you the contacts list " .
And thus the phone was " broken .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously rather than dipping the phone in water, it was put into a solution of sodium pentothal, and the phone barked "Enough of this torture, I'll give you the contacts list".
And thus the phone was "broken.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725920</id>
	<title>Re:Unbreakable???</title>
	<author>Fear the Clam</author>
	<datestamp>1263237840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>That is the most blatant false advertising since my lawsuit against the movie, The Neverending Story.</i></p><p>Or the never ending video game Final Fantasy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is the most blatant false advertising since my lawsuit against the movie , The Neverending Story.Or the never ending video game Final Fantasy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is the most blatant false advertising since my lawsuit against the movie, The Neverending Story.Or the never ending video game Final Fantasy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30730280</id>
	<title>A better use for unbreakable phones</title>
	<author>mwvdlee</author>
	<datestamp>1263210480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this phone was truely unbreakable, we should use it as armour plating on tanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this phone was truely unbreakable , we should use it as armour plating on tanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this phone was truely unbreakable, we should use it as armour plating on tanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726764</id>
	<title>Re:Spoiler:</title>
	<author>ckaminski</author>
	<datestamp>1263241380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Look.  I don't care if the LCD screen breaks..  I mean, I do, but if you can build a screen robust enough so that the device is still SOMEWHAT usable in a pinch, then we're golden.  And engineer your interface so that if the touch-screen is malfunctioning, you can still use the device (Treo!), great.<br><br>I pity all the iPhone users with broken screens and I'm terrified of the day I break the screen on my iPod Touch.<br><br>I've broken the screen on my treo, and it was usable, except for a few apps that didn't function well without a touchscreen, or when the touchscreen was stuck (and I had to break it extra good to get it to stop trying to SMS some dude in Somalia).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look .
I do n't care if the LCD screen breaks.. I mean , I do , but if you can build a screen robust enough so that the device is still SOMEWHAT usable in a pinch , then we 're golden .
And engineer your interface so that if the touch-screen is malfunctioning , you can still use the device ( Treo !
) , great.I pity all the iPhone users with broken screens and I 'm terrified of the day I break the screen on my iPod Touch.I 've broken the screen on my treo , and it was usable , except for a few apps that did n't function well without a touchscreen , or when the touchscreen was stuck ( and I had to break it extra good to get it to stop trying to SMS some dude in Somalia ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look.
I don't care if the LCD screen breaks..  I mean, I do, but if you can build a screen robust enough so that the device is still SOMEWHAT usable in a pinch, then we're golden.
And engineer your interface so that if the touch-screen is malfunctioning, you can still use the device (Treo!
), great.I pity all the iPhone users with broken screens and I'm terrified of the day I break the screen on my iPod Touch.I've broken the screen on my treo, and it was usable, except for a few apps that didn't function well without a touchscreen, or when the touchscreen was stuck (and I had to break it extra good to get it to stop trying to SMS some dude in Somalia).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724798</id>
	<title>Video</title>
	<author>pete-classic</author>
	<datestamp>1263233280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone have a link to the actual video?  The provided link just keeps playing a PBS commercial at me.</p><p>-Peter</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone have a link to the actual video ?
The provided link just keeps playing a PBS commercial at me.-Peter</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone have a link to the actual video?
The provided link just keeps playing a PBS commercial at me.-Peter</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729956</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263209040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The word "man" originally meant the entire human race. Later on people decided to call the sexy ones "Woohoo man!" or "woman" for short.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The word " man " originally meant the entire human race .
Later on people decided to call the sexy ones " Woohoo man !
" or " woman " for short .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The word "man" originally meant the entire human race.
Later on people decided to call the sexy ones "Woohoo man!
" or "woman" for short.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30728074</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>Chysn</author>
	<datestamp>1263202200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm...</p><ul>
<li>"In Soviet Russia, the British journalists are no match for YOU..." or </li><li>"All your base are no match for a British journalist" or</li><li>"Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of British journalists?" or</li><li>"It's like a 1989 Buick LeSabre in that it's no match for a British journalist" or</li><li>"Duke Nukem Forever is no match for a British journalist" or</li><li>"A British journalist beat my brother at Wimbledon, you insensitive clod!"</li></ul><p>I like it.  It fits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm.. . " In Soviet Russia , the British journalists are no match for YOU... " or " All your base are no match for a British journalist " or " Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of British journalists ?
" or " It 's like a 1989 Buick LeSabre in that it 's no match for a British journalist " or " Duke Nukem Forever is no match for a British journalist " or " A British journalist beat my brother at Wimbledon , you insensitive clod !
" I like it .
It fits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm...
"In Soviet Russia, the British journalists are no match for YOU..." or "All your base are no match for a British journalist" or"Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of British journalists?
" or"It's like a 1989 Buick LeSabre in that it's no match for a British journalist" or"Duke Nukem Forever is no match for a British journalist" or"A British journalist beat my brother at Wimbledon, you insensitive clod!
"I like it.
It fits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725710</id>
	<title>Re:Spoiler:</title>
	<author>tlhIngan</author>
	<datestamp>1263236760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>He just smashes the screen against the corner of the fish tank that he just failed to drown it in. Not being covered in rubber like the rest of the phone, it breaks like any normal screen. You could probably apply the same pressure by accidentally dropping it on a jagged rock.</p></div></blockquote><p>A fairly big oversight when testing for destruction - after all, you want to concentrate on the unarmored areas because they'd be an obvious weak spot. And a huge planar surface like an LCD seems especially prone to breaking from accidental overpressure on a point.</p><p>Still, there are many ways to protect such things - the common ones I've seen is to space the LCD away from the touchscreen and use the extra gap to stick in some protection. Smashing the screen may destroy the touchpanel, but the screen stays protected. It was common joked we could use the things as hammers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He just smashes the screen against the corner of the fish tank that he just failed to drown it in .
Not being covered in rubber like the rest of the phone , it breaks like any normal screen .
You could probably apply the same pressure by accidentally dropping it on a jagged rock.A fairly big oversight when testing for destruction - after all , you want to concentrate on the unarmored areas because they 'd be an obvious weak spot .
And a huge planar surface like an LCD seems especially prone to breaking from accidental overpressure on a point.Still , there are many ways to protect such things - the common ones I 've seen is to space the LCD away from the touchscreen and use the extra gap to stick in some protection .
Smashing the screen may destroy the touchpanel , but the screen stays protected .
It was common joked we could use the things as hammers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He just smashes the screen against the corner of the fish tank that he just failed to drown it in.
Not being covered in rubber like the rest of the phone, it breaks like any normal screen.
You could probably apply the same pressure by accidentally dropping it on a jagged rock.A fairly big oversight when testing for destruction - after all, you want to concentrate on the unarmored areas because they'd be an obvious weak spot.
And a huge planar surface like an LCD seems especially prone to breaking from accidental overpressure on a point.Still, there are many ways to protect such things - the common ones I've seen is to space the LCD away from the touchscreen and use the extra gap to stick in some protection.
Smashing the screen may destroy the touchpanel, but the screen stays protected.
It was common joked we could use the things as hammers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724852</id>
	<title>Awkward</title>
	<author>electricbern</author>
	<datestamp>1263233460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The "unbreakable" phone being actually breakable is nothing extraordinary, but the awkward position the reporter puts the guy on is priceless. And I have to tell you the reporter was pretty gentle with the phone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The " unbreakable " phone being actually breakable is nothing extraordinary , but the awkward position the reporter puts the guy on is priceless .
And I have to tell you the reporter was pretty gentle with the phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "unbreakable" phone being actually breakable is nothing extraordinary, but the awkward position the reporter puts the guy on is priceless.
And I have to tell you the reporter was pretty gentle with the phone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30732720</id>
	<title>More marketing than engineering</title>
	<author>Naznarreb</author>
	<datestamp>1263226080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The phone was designed to be unbreakable provided you're doing anything with the phone besides using it <i>as a phone</i>. I mean, seriously, how often are people near 10th story balconies? And supposing you did drop it in 20 meters (65ish feet) of water, unless you were just getting ready to go SCUBA diving you're not getting back at all, let alone within the 1/2 hour time limit that's certainly specified in the warranty. And I can't tell you the number of times I was doing a little carpentry, and they only tool that was available to me was my cell phone. For me, from personal experience, an "unbreakable" phone would be able to survive all of the following:<br>
<br>
-Repeated trips through the washer and dryer<br>
-Left outside, in all weather, for 2 days<br>
-Abruptly sat on, on a hard bench or concrete ledge<br>
-Stepped on, screen side up or down, on various surfaces from carpet to gravel<br>
-Thrown across the room in anger/frustration<br>
-Left on the dash of my car when when it's 110 outside and 195 in the car<br>
-For flip phones: landing open, hinge side up, then being stepped on<br>
<br>
That's the environment it needs to be designed for.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The phone was designed to be unbreakable provided you 're doing anything with the phone besides using it as a phone .
I mean , seriously , how often are people near 10th story balconies ?
And supposing you did drop it in 20 meters ( 65ish feet ) of water , unless you were just getting ready to go SCUBA diving you 're not getting back at all , let alone within the 1/2 hour time limit that 's certainly specified in the warranty .
And I ca n't tell you the number of times I was doing a little carpentry , and they only tool that was available to me was my cell phone .
For me , from personal experience , an " unbreakable " phone would be able to survive all of the following : -Repeated trips through the washer and dryer -Left outside , in all weather , for 2 days -Abruptly sat on , on a hard bench or concrete ledge -Stepped on , screen side up or down , on various surfaces from carpet to gravel -Thrown across the room in anger/frustration -Left on the dash of my car when when it 's 110 outside and 195 in the car -For flip phones : landing open , hinge side up , then being stepped on That 's the environment it needs to be designed for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The phone was designed to be unbreakable provided you're doing anything with the phone besides using it as a phone.
I mean, seriously, how often are people near 10th story balconies?
And supposing you did drop it in 20 meters (65ish feet) of water, unless you were just getting ready to go SCUBA diving you're not getting back at all, let alone within the 1/2 hour time limit that's certainly specified in the warranty.
And I can't tell you the number of times I was doing a little carpentry, and they only tool that was available to me was my cell phone.
For me, from personal experience, an "unbreakable" phone would be able to survive all of the following:

-Repeated trips through the washer and dryer
-Left outside, in all weather, for 2 days
-Abruptly sat on, on a hard bench or concrete ledge
-Stepped on, screen side up or down, on various surfaces from carpet to gravel
-Thrown across the room in anger/frustration
-Left on the dash of my car when when it's 110 outside and 195 in the car
-For flip phones: landing open, hinge side up, then being stepped on

That's the environment it needs to be designed for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725814</id>
	<title>Re:Always the screen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263237120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean synthetic sapphire (aluminum oxide?)  Yeah they already have that for cellphones in Nokia's Vertu Brand:</p><p># Signature&rsquo;s face utilizes 69.25 carats of sapphire crystal.<br># Signature&rsquo;s face includes the &ldquo;largest piece of complex cosmetic sapphire in the world&rdquo;.</p><p>http://cellphones.about.com/od/vertuphonereviews/fr/vertusignature.htm</p><p>*Bra-Boosh*  That's the sound of your mind being blown<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean synthetic sapphire ( aluminum oxide ?
) Yeah they already have that for cellphones in Nokia 's Vertu Brand : # Signature    s face utilizes 69.25 carats of sapphire crystal. # Signature    s face includes the    largest piece of complex cosmetic sapphire in the world    .http : //cellphones.about.com/od/vertuphonereviews/fr/vertusignature.htm * Bra-Boosh * That 's the sound of your mind being blown ; D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean synthetic sapphire (aluminum oxide?
)  Yeah they already have that for cellphones in Nokia's Vertu Brand:# Signature’s face utilizes 69.25 carats of sapphire crystal.# Signature’s face includes the “largest piece of complex cosmetic sapphire in the world”.http://cellphones.about.com/od/vertuphonereviews/fr/vertusignature.htm*Bra-Boosh*  That's the sound of your mind being blown ;D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725014</id>
	<title>Reminds me of the Nextel "military spec" phones.</title>
	<author>King\_TJ</author>
	<datestamp>1263234000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Our Nextel rep tried to sell us on some of their rubber-encased, bulky "ruggedized" phones last year, bragging about how they met U.S. military specifications and so on.  We tried out a few, and one of the maintenance guys out in the shop managed to break the "push to talk" button on his the first day he had it.  A couple others developed keypad failures in a matter of months.</p><p>The fact is, the cellphone makers come up with these claims based on very specific types of "accidents", such as the phone's ability to survive submerging in water to a certain depth, or surviving a drop from X number of feet.  In the real world, people find MANY other ways to break these devices that weren't even investigated.  (The guys in our shop do a lot of grinding and cutting of steel, for example.  Eventually, the little metal filings find their way into the cellphone's speaker, where the magnet in the speaker causes them to collect up - until they make a big enough pile to short things out.  When disassembling "dead" phones, we've found that a number of times.  But I haven't seen a single cellphone maker take any steps in their design to prevent THAT mode of failure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Our Nextel rep tried to sell us on some of their rubber-encased , bulky " ruggedized " phones last year , bragging about how they met U.S. military specifications and so on .
We tried out a few , and one of the maintenance guys out in the shop managed to break the " push to talk " button on his the first day he had it .
A couple others developed keypad failures in a matter of months.The fact is , the cellphone makers come up with these claims based on very specific types of " accidents " , such as the phone 's ability to survive submerging in water to a certain depth , or surviving a drop from X number of feet .
In the real world , people find MANY other ways to break these devices that were n't even investigated .
( The guys in our shop do a lot of grinding and cutting of steel , for example .
Eventually , the little metal filings find their way into the cellphone 's speaker , where the magnet in the speaker causes them to collect up - until they make a big enough pile to short things out .
When disassembling " dead " phones , we 've found that a number of times .
But I have n't seen a single cellphone maker take any steps in their design to prevent THAT mode of failure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our Nextel rep tried to sell us on some of their rubber-encased, bulky "ruggedized" phones last year, bragging about how they met U.S. military specifications and so on.
We tried out a few, and one of the maintenance guys out in the shop managed to break the "push to talk" button on his the first day he had it.
A couple others developed keypad failures in a matter of months.The fact is, the cellphone makers come up with these claims based on very specific types of "accidents", such as the phone's ability to survive submerging in water to a certain depth, or surviving a drop from X number of feet.
In the real world, people find MANY other ways to break these devices that weren't even investigated.
(The guys in our shop do a lot of grinding and cutting of steel, for example.
Eventually, the little metal filings find their way into the cellphone's speaker, where the magnet in the speaker causes them to collect up - until they make a big enough pile to short things out.
When disassembling "dead" phones, we've found that a number of times.
But I haven't seen a single cellphone maker take any steps in their design to prevent THAT mode of failure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725962</id>
	<title>Note to self:</title>
	<author>Daley\_G</author>
	<datestamp>1263238020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't wait until the product is on display at an international convention to validate claims of ultimate reliability.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't wait until the product is on display at an international convention to validate claims of ultimate reliability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't wait until the product is on display at an international convention to validate claims of ultimate reliability.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725564</id>
	<title>Yes but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263236160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... does it run Linux?</p><p>And can you break it merely by installing Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... does it run Linux ? And can you break it merely by installing Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... does it run Linux?And can you break it merely by installing Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725592</id>
	<title>what did the rep do?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263236280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so... did the reporter get a free one?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so... did the reporter get a free one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so... did the reporter get a free one?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729020</id>
	<title>everything is breakable</title>
	<author>Khashishi</author>
	<datestamp>1263205620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's no such thing as unbreakable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no such thing as unbreakable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no such thing as unbreakable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725554</id>
	<title>Wow the "sales rep" was not seeing that comming</title>
	<author>McNihil</author>
	<datestamp>1263236160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Epic fail... though I have to say the rep did do a good job showing humility. Good PR in the end.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Epic fail... though I have to say the rep did do a good job showing humility .
Good PR in the end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Epic fail... though I have to say the rep did do a good job showing humility.
Good PR in the end.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726568</id>
	<title>Re:I love the rep's reaction though</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263240660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Best would be if he took an extra screen out of his pocket, and just popped the old one with a "Cheaper than replacing the phone.", replaced the broken one with the new and showed it working.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Best would be if he took an extra screen out of his pocket , and just popped the old one with a " Cheaper than replacing the phone .
" , replaced the broken one with the new and showed it working .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Best would be if he took an extra screen out of his pocket, and just popped the old one with a "Cheaper than replacing the phone.
", replaced the broken one with the new and showed it working.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726268</id>
	<title>Re:Unbreakable???</title>
	<author>Dracolytch</author>
	<datestamp>1263239520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They had to make some cuts for the film adaptation. The original cast went in for a read-through of the initial script, and nobody ever heard back from them. That's why we have the abridged version with their understudies.</p><p>~D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They had to make some cuts for the film adaptation .
The original cast went in for a read-through of the initial script , and nobody ever heard back from them .
That 's why we have the abridged version with their understudies. ~ D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They had to make some cuts for the film adaptation.
The original cast went in for a read-through of the initial script, and nobody ever heard back from them.
That's why we have the abridged version with their understudies.~D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725476</id>
	<title>Re:Spoiler:</title>
	<author>Junior J. Junior III</author>
	<datestamp>1263235680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>To be fair, it takes him a few solid whallops before it does break, and the rep doesn't look the least bit concerned until it actually snaps.</p></div><p>To be fair, they have a good laugh about it after it breaks, too.  The company rep doesn't act embarrassed, and has good humor about it.</p><p>I think if I needed a rugged phone I'd probably consider one from this company anyway, it's certainly a more durable phone than a regular phone.  Obviously not "indestructible" but it'd handle being in my pocket.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair , it takes him a few solid whallops before it does break , and the rep does n't look the least bit concerned until it actually snaps.To be fair , they have a good laugh about it after it breaks , too .
The company rep does n't act embarrassed , and has good humor about it.I think if I needed a rugged phone I 'd probably consider one from this company anyway , it 's certainly a more durable phone than a regular phone .
Obviously not " indestructible " but it 'd handle being in my pocket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair, it takes him a few solid whallops before it does break, and the rep doesn't look the least bit concerned until it actually snaps.To be fair, they have a good laugh about it after it breaks, too.
The company rep doesn't act embarrassed, and has good humor about it.I think if I needed a rugged phone I'd probably consider one from this company anyway, it's certainly a more durable phone than a regular phone.
Obviously not "indestructible" but it'd handle being in my pocket.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726530</id>
	<title>Re:Unbreakable???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263240480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or Stoner's Pot Palace</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or Stoner 's Pot Palace</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or Stoner's Pot Palace</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30730590</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>ukemike</author>
	<datestamp>1263211980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can actually here Jeremy Clarkson saying this in my mind.  Not that he's really a journalist...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can actually here Jeremy Clarkson saying this in my mind .
Not that he 's really a journalist.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can actually here Jeremy Clarkson saying this in my mind.
Not that he's really a journalist...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724814</id>
	<title>Use it as a hammer?</title>
	<author>jgreco</author>
	<datestamp>1263233340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, I wouldn't consider it indestructible at least until you can try to nail it to the wall WITH a hammer and nail - and it still works.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , I would n't consider it indestructible at least until you can try to nail it to the wall WITH a hammer and nail - and it still works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, I wouldn't consider it indestructible at least until you can try to nail it to the wall WITH a hammer and nail - and it still works.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724850</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>SlowMovingTarget</author>
	<datestamp>1263233460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An American journalist would've rephrased the marketing blurb on the phone, not tried it out, and welcomed our new invincible mobile overlords, only to be made fun of by Jon Stewart later that night.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An American journalist would 've rephrased the marketing blurb on the phone , not tried it out , and welcomed our new invincible mobile overlords , only to be made fun of by Jon Stewart later that night .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An American journalist would've rephrased the marketing blurb on the phone, not tried it out, and welcomed our new invincible mobile overlords, only to be made fun of by Jon Stewart later that night.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30734910</id>
	<title>Unbreakable?</title>
	<author>Kitkoan</author>
	<datestamp>1263294840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I take unbreakable as a personal challenge</htmltext>
<tokenext>I take unbreakable as a personal challenge</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I take unbreakable as a personal challenge</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263234000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>An American journalist would've rephrased the marketing blurb on the phone, not tried it out, and welcomed our new invincible mobile overlords, only to be made fun of by Jon Stewart later that night.</p></div><p>It's a bit offtopic but I just heard something about this <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=122375199&amp;sc=fb&amp;cc=fp" title="npr.org">on NPR recently</a> [npr.org]:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>For decades, young reporters would ask themselves, "What would Walter think?" Nowadays, it's not the memory of Walter Cronkite or even Edward R. Murrow that motivates some reporters &mdash; it's more often the fear that the stories they put out today might get picked apart by Jon Stewart tomorrow. </p><p>Prominent among the wary: <em>NBC Nightly News</em> anchor Brian Williams, who recently explained in a magazine essay that <em>The Daily Show</em> host "has gone from optional to indispensable" in just a few short years.</p></div><p>I found it odd yet telling that keeping anchors in check is not regulated by role models today but rather the court jester.  Indeed, my opinions of both Fox News and CNN have dropped significantly from watching a few shows of Stewarts where he systematically picks apart their idiocy with a montage or just pointing out the obvious.  It's like an MST3K recap of the day's news<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... except with a bizarre twist: the truth.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>An American journalist would 've rephrased the marketing blurb on the phone , not tried it out , and welcomed our new invincible mobile overlords , only to be made fun of by Jon Stewart later that night.It 's a bit offtopic but I just heard something about this on NPR recently [ npr.org ] : For decades , young reporters would ask themselves , " What would Walter think ?
" Nowadays , it 's not the memory of Walter Cronkite or even Edward R. Murrow that motivates some reporters    it 's more often the fear that the stories they put out today might get picked apart by Jon Stewart tomorrow .
Prominent among the wary : NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams , who recently explained in a magazine essay that The Daily Show host " has gone from optional to indispensable " in just a few short years.I found it odd yet telling that keeping anchors in check is not regulated by role models today but rather the court jester .
Indeed , my opinions of both Fox News and CNN have dropped significantly from watching a few shows of Stewarts where he systematically picks apart their idiocy with a montage or just pointing out the obvious .
It 's like an MST3K recap of the day 's news ... except with a bizarre twist : the truth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An American journalist would've rephrased the marketing blurb on the phone, not tried it out, and welcomed our new invincible mobile overlords, only to be made fun of by Jon Stewart later that night.It's a bit offtopic but I just heard something about this on NPR recently [npr.org]:For decades, young reporters would ask themselves, "What would Walter think?
" Nowadays, it's not the memory of Walter Cronkite or even Edward R. Murrow that motivates some reporters — it's more often the fear that the stories they put out today might get picked apart by Jon Stewart tomorrow.
Prominent among the wary: NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams, who recently explained in a magazine essay that The Daily Show host "has gone from optional to indispensable" in just a few short years.I found it odd yet telling that keeping anchors in check is not regulated by role models today but rather the court jester.
Indeed, my opinions of both Fox News and CNN have dropped significantly from watching a few shows of Stewarts where he systematically picks apart their idiocy with a montage or just pointing out the obvious.
It's like an MST3K recap of the day's news ... except with a bizarre twist: the truth.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726674</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>quanticle</author>
	<datestamp>1263241140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In addition to providing entertainment, wasn't the court jester supposed to keep the monarch humble by pointing out things that others would not dare?  I'd say Jon Stewart makes an excellent jester in that regard, and all the more power to him for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In addition to providing entertainment , was n't the court jester supposed to keep the monarch humble by pointing out things that others would not dare ?
I 'd say Jon Stewart makes an excellent jester in that regard , and all the more power to him for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In addition to providing entertainment, wasn't the court jester supposed to keep the monarch humble by pointing out things that others would not dare?
I'd say Jon Stewart makes an excellent jester in that regard, and all the more power to him for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724866</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>turtleAJ</author>
	<datestamp>1263233520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What does the reporters nationality have anything to do with it?</p></div></blockquote><p>Yeah... and they said "being submerged 20 feet for 30 mins"<br>How much is that in meters?!<br>VW Bugs laid end-to-end?</p><p>British Reporter breaks phone... in retaliation, American site breaks British site...</p><p>Somebody tell me what nationality the phone is!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What does the reporters nationality have anything to do with it ? Yeah... and they said " being submerged 20 feet for 30 mins " How much is that in meters ?
! VW Bugs laid end-to-end ? British Reporter breaks phone... in retaliation , American site breaks British site...Somebody tell me what nationality the phone is !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does the reporters nationality have anything to do with it?Yeah... and they said "being submerged 20 feet for 30 mins"How much is that in meters?
!VW Bugs laid end-to-end?British Reporter breaks phone... in retaliation, American site breaks British site...Somebody tell me what nationality the phone is!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724816</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>XPeter</author>
	<datestamp>1263233340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It adds another word to the bland summary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It adds another word to the bland summary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It adds another word to the bland summary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729322</id>
	<title>Bright.nl took a bit longer</title>
	<author>Incadenza</author>
	<datestamp>1263206580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He wasn't the first to break the phone, but <a href="http://www.youtube.com/brighttv#p/u/2/Ca-w98Ot4Jw" title="youtube.com">this Dutch reviewer</a> [youtube.com] did need more time (and more tools).</htmltext>
<tokenext>He was n't the first to break the phone , but this Dutch reviewer [ youtube.com ] did need more time ( and more tools ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He wasn't the first to break the phone, but this Dutch reviewer [youtube.com] did need more time (and more tools).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725660</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263236520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He often doesn't need to really point out anything.  Simply display a video of what someone said yesterday next to a video of what they said two years ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He often does n't need to really point out anything .
Simply display a video of what someone said yesterday next to a video of what they said two years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He often doesn't need to really point out anything.
Simply display a video of what someone said yesterday next to a video of what they said two years ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30728864</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263205020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You sound like those crazy sociology professors who get pissed at words like "manhole" and "mankind." It's part of the presentation style, relax.</p></div><p>Some of those professors are brilliant satirists:
<a href="http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs655/readings/purity.html" title="virginia.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs655/readings/purity.html</a> [virginia.edu]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You sound like those crazy sociology professors who get pissed at words like " manhole " and " mankind .
" It 's part of the presentation style , relax.Some of those professors are brilliant satirists : http : //www.cs.virginia.edu/ ~ evans/cs655/readings/purity.html [ virginia.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You sound like those crazy sociology professors who get pissed at words like "manhole" and "mankind.
" It's part of the presentation style, relax.Some of those professors are brilliant satirists:
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs655/readings/purity.html [virginia.edu]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729140</id>
	<title>Re:Off-topic but noteworthy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263205980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for 2000$, I'll make you a web player that goes to 12</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for 2000 $ , I 'll make you a web player that goes to 12</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for 2000$, I'll make you a web player that goes to 12</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724892</id>
	<title>Re:Spoiler:</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1263233520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be fair, it takes him a few solid whallops before it does break, and the rep doesn't look the least bit concerned until it actually snaps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair , it takes him a few solid whallops before it does break , and the rep does n't look the least bit concerned until it actually snaps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair, it takes him a few solid whallops before it does break, and the rep doesn't look the least bit concerned until it actually snaps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725786</id>
	<title>Re:Spoiler:</title>
	<author>street struttin'</author>
	<datestamp>1263237060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't believe it took this long for someone to post just exactly what he did. I went to RTFA until i realized it was a video and it started playing a commercial at me. How much effort is it to write "he whacked the screen on a hard object"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe it took this long for someone to post just exactly what he did .
I went to RTFA until i realized it was a video and it started playing a commercial at me .
How much effort is it to write " he whacked the screen on a hard object " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe it took this long for someone to post just exactly what he did.
I went to RTFA until i realized it was a video and it started playing a commercial at me.
How much effort is it to write "he whacked the screen on a hard object"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30728976</id>
	<title>god dammed limy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263205380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>god dommed limy used his shiyttey teath</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>god dommed limy used his shiyttey teath</tokentext>
<sentencetext>god dommed limy used his shiyttey teath</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726208</id>
	<title>Re:Screens are weak</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1263239220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does it need a screen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does it need a screen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does it need a screen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822</id>
	<title>Spoiler:</title>
	<author>bcmm</author>
	<datestamp>1263233340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>He just smashes the screen against the corner of the fish tank that he just failed to drown it in. Not being covered in rubber like the rest of the phone, it breaks like any normal screen. You could probably apply the same pressure by accidentally dropping it on a jagged rock.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He just smashes the screen against the corner of the fish tank that he just failed to drown it in .
Not being covered in rubber like the rest of the phone , it breaks like any normal screen .
You could probably apply the same pressure by accidentally dropping it on a jagged rock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He just smashes the screen against the corner of the fish tank that he just failed to drown it in.
Not being covered in rubber like the rest of the phone, it breaks like any normal screen.
You could probably apply the same pressure by accidentally dropping it on a jagged rock.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726408</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>Shotgun</author>
	<datestamp>1263240000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess he doesn't do MSNBC, because they're just to damn easy, being a complete parody of themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess he does n't do MSNBC , because they 're just to damn easy , being a complete parody of themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess he doesn't do MSNBC, because they're just to damn easy, being a complete parody of themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726714</id>
	<title>Re:Always the screen</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1263241260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Screens have become much more durable.  My Palm V screen broke even though it was in a good leather case.  My keys happened to be in the exact wrong position and, with the body mass, shattered the screen.  This was one of the reasons why I went to flip phone.  Still broke the little outer screen, though.  OTOH, my old iPhone, in my pocket with no protection for a couple years, had no issue.  I have seen similar strength on other phones.  If I were worried about anything on the new phones, it would the thin plastic shell.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Screens have become much more durable .
My Palm V screen broke even though it was in a good leather case .
My keys happened to be in the exact wrong position and , with the body mass , shattered the screen .
This was one of the reasons why I went to flip phone .
Still broke the little outer screen , though .
OTOH , my old iPhone , in my pocket with no protection for a couple years , had no issue .
I have seen similar strength on other phones .
If I were worried about anything on the new phones , it would the thin plastic shell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screens have become much more durable.
My Palm V screen broke even though it was in a good leather case.
My keys happened to be in the exact wrong position and, with the body mass, shattered the screen.
This was one of the reasons why I went to flip phone.
Still broke the little outer screen, though.
OTOH, my old iPhone, in my pocket with no protection for a couple years, had no issue.
I have seen similar strength on other phones.
If I were worried about anything on the new phones, it would the thin plastic shell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726266</id>
	<title>Two Words..</title>
	<author>sc0p3</author>
	<datestamp>1263239520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Free Advertising.

They only use "indestructible" to attract people to try and destroy it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Free Advertising .
They only use " indestructible " to attract people to try and destroy it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free Advertising.
They only use "indestructible" to attract people to try and destroy it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724848</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263233400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not as if we wouldn't have known anyway: his first reaction is to apologize profusely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not as if we would n't have known anyway : his first reaction is to apologize profusely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not as if we wouldn't have known anyway: his first reaction is to apologize profusely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725834</id>
	<title>The Bal Conies test</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1263237300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An acquaintance of mine who suspected that he was being BSed by a sales person asked if his project had passed the Bal Conies test.</p><p>"Yes, it certainly has," he replied.</p><p>"Really!" he said. "Let's see." He then took the device in question and dropped it off the Bal Cony.</p><p>Sadly, the device in question did *not* pass the Bal Conies test.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An acquaintance of mine who suspected that he was being BSed by a sales person asked if his project had passed the Bal Conies test .
" Yes , it certainly has , " he replied. " Really !
" he said .
" Let 's see .
" He then took the device in question and dropped it off the Bal Cony.Sadly , the device in question did * not * pass the Bal Conies test .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An acquaintance of mine who suspected that he was being BSed by a sales person asked if his project had passed the Bal Conies test.
"Yes, it certainly has," he replied."Really!
" he said.
"Let's see.
" He then took the device in question and dropped it off the Bal Cony.Sadly, the device in question did *not* pass the Bal Conies test.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726542</id>
	<title>Re:I love the rep's reaction though - New Phone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263240540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you watch the first 15(+) seconds again you will notice that the CEO does offer the reporter a new phone if the reporter can break the test phone<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you watch the first 15 ( + ) seconds again you will notice that the CEO does offer the reporter a new phone if the reporter can break the test phone : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you watch the first 15(+) seconds again you will notice that the CEO does offer the reporter a new phone if the reporter can break the test phone :D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725070</id>
	<title>Re:Video = patience Grasshopper (pete-classic)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263234180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you are patient enough the story does follow your PBS commercial.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you are patient enough the story does follow your PBS commercial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you are patient enough the story does follow your PBS commercial.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30730982</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the nationalism</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1263213960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>EVERYONE IS FREAKING BIASED TO THEIR OWN BELIEFS</p></div><p>What an amazing revelation. You must be one proud 13 year-old.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>try to understand the point of view of the other side, which, even when you don't think you agree, 9 times out of 10 what the other side is saying has merit</p></div><p>Where did you get that statistic from?</p><p><div class="quote"><p> if you're too stupid to realize 'your political party' or 'your news channel' isn't just as fucked up as the other side,</p></div><p>Except that isn't true. Some sides are more correct and truthful than others. Thinking that everything is equally biased is as stupid a fallacy as thinking there is no bias.</p><p>The fact is that when it comes to many issues, often one side is just lying and spreading propaganda that has no basis in truth. Sometimes both sides are, but that's much rarer.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>EVERYONE IS FREAKING BIASED TO THEIR OWN BELIEFSWhat an amazing revelation .
You must be one proud 13 year-old.try to understand the point of view of the other side , which , even when you do n't think you agree , 9 times out of 10 what the other side is saying has meritWhere did you get that statistic from ?
if you 're too stupid to realize 'your political party ' or 'your news channel ' is n't just as fucked up as the other side,Except that is n't true .
Some sides are more correct and truthful than others .
Thinking that everything is equally biased is as stupid a fallacy as thinking there is no bias.The fact is that when it comes to many issues , often one side is just lying and spreading propaganda that has no basis in truth .
Sometimes both sides are , but that 's much rarer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>EVERYONE IS FREAKING BIASED TO THEIR OWN BELIEFSWhat an amazing revelation.
You must be one proud 13 year-old.try to understand the point of view of the other side, which, even when you don't think you agree, 9 times out of 10 what the other side is saying has meritWhere did you get that statistic from?
if you're too stupid to realize 'your political party' or 'your news channel' isn't just as fucked up as the other side,Except that isn't true.
Some sides are more correct and truthful than others.
Thinking that everything is equally biased is as stupid a fallacy as thinking there is no bias.The fact is that when it comes to many issues, often one side is just lying and spreading propaganda that has no basis in truth.
Sometimes both sides are, but that's much rarer.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726298</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725586</id>
	<title>Re:Reminds me of the Nextel "military spec" phones</title>
	<author>Xtravar</author>
	<datestamp>1263236280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here at work, we've gotten free devices with kevlar-coated screens on occasion for software development.  One of our developers accidentally split the device's case in half from a 3 foot drop when they're supposed to have a 6 foot drop spec.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here at work , we 've gotten free devices with kevlar-coated screens on occasion for software development .
One of our developers accidentally split the device 's case in half from a 3 foot drop when they 're supposed to have a 6 foot drop spec .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here at work, we've gotten free devices with kevlar-coated screens on occasion for software development.
One of our developers accidentally split the device's case in half from a 3 foot drop when they're supposed to have a 6 foot drop spec.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724888</id>
	<title>Always the screen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263233520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The key to breakage here being that when they said "You can hammer a nail with it!" they <i>didn't</i> mean, "You can hammer a nail with <i>the screen</i>"</p><p>Screens will always be the weak point until we get that transparent aluminum out there to shield it while keeping it visible. And even then, you know, that little display would still be susceptible to heat. I have a hunch a lighter would have had similar success in destroying the screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The key to breakage here being that when they said " You can hammer a nail with it !
" they did n't mean , " You can hammer a nail with the screen " Screens will always be the weak point until we get that transparent aluminum out there to shield it while keeping it visible .
And even then , you know , that little display would still be susceptible to heat .
I have a hunch a lighter would have had similar success in destroying the screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The key to breakage here being that when they said "You can hammer a nail with it!
" they didn't mean, "You can hammer a nail with the screen"Screens will always be the weak point until we get that transparent aluminum out there to shield it while keeping it visible.
And even then, you know, that little display would still be susceptible to heat.
I have a hunch a lighter would have had similar success in destroying the screen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727484</id>
	<title>Free phone</title>
	<author>Acecoolco</author>
	<datestamp>1263243420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Im surprised no one posted this... But the phone guy promised the guy a free phone if he could break it... pay up?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Im surprised no one posted this... But the phone guy promised the guy a free phone if he could break it... pay up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Im surprised no one posted this... But the phone guy promised the guy a free phone if he could break it... pay up?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727626</id>
	<title>Re:Spoiler:</title>
	<author>Angostura</author>
	<datestamp>1263200700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And kudos to the CEO for actually having an outbreak of genuine mirth when it broke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And kudos to the CEO for actually having an outbreak of genuine mirth when it broke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And kudos to the CEO for actually having an outbreak of genuine mirth when it broke.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725254</id>
	<title>So, it's not unbreakable ...</title>
	<author>jonhainer</author>
	<datestamp>1263234900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... but will it blend?

</p><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qg1ckCkm8YI" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Will it blend?  - iPhone</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... but will it blend ?
Will it blend ?
- iPhone [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... but will it blend?
Will it blend?
- iPhone [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725276</id>
	<title>Re:Spoiler:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263234960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It did take 3 to 4 good hits before breaking.  I have to say that he was hitting it quite hard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It did take 3 to 4 good hits before breaking .
I have to say that he was hitting it quite hard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It did take 3 to 4 good hits before breaking.
I have to say that he was hitting it quite hard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725604</id>
	<title>Re:Always the screen</title>
	<author>swillden</author>
	<datestamp>1263236340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Screens will always be the weak point until we get that transparent aluminum out there</p></div><p>You mean like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapphire" title="wikipedia.org">this transparent aluminum</a> [wikipedia.org] (oxide)?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Screens will always be the weak point until we get that transparent aluminum out thereYou mean like this transparent aluminum [ wikipedia.org ] ( oxide ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screens will always be the weak point until we get that transparent aluminum out thereYou mean like this transparent aluminum [wikipedia.org] (oxide)?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724888</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30728074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30730880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30728904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30741188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30730874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30730982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30728864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30730590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729140
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1522212_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727484
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725712
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30730590
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30728074
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729304
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724914
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724850
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725012
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726932
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725660
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30730874
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726408
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726286
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726298
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30730982
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726674
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726806
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724808
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729956
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725980
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30728864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724848
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725456
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724814
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725604
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729402
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726208
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30741188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729140
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729020
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30728904
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724852
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30730880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30729048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725710
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724892
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727626
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727734
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725476
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30726710
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725068
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30725106
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1522212.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30724844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1522212.30727112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
