<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_10_1958229</id>
	<title>Pneumatic Tube Communication In Hospitals</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1263115860000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>blee37 sends along a writeup from the School of Medicine at Stanford University on their <a href="http://med.stanford.edu/ism/2010/january/tubes-0111.html">pneumatic tube delivery system</a>, used for sending atoms not bits. Such systems are in use in hospitals nationwide; the 19th-century technology is enhancd by recent refinements in pneumatic braking. <i>"Every day, 7,000 times a day, Stanford Hospital staff turn to pneumatic tubes, cutting-edge technology in the 19th century, for a transport network that the Internet and all the latest Silicon Valley wizardry can't match: A tubular system to transport a lab sample across the medical center in the blink of an eye."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>blee37 sends along a writeup from the School of Medicine at Stanford University on their pneumatic tube delivery system , used for sending atoms not bits .
Such systems are in use in hospitals nationwide ; the 19th-century technology is enhancd by recent refinements in pneumatic braking .
" Every day , 7,000 times a day , Stanford Hospital staff turn to pneumatic tubes , cutting-edge technology in the 19th century , for a transport network that the Internet and all the latest Silicon Valley wizardry ca n't match : A tubular system to transport a lab sample across the medical center in the blink of an eye .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>blee37 sends along a writeup from the School of Medicine at Stanford University on their pneumatic tube delivery system, used for sending atoms not bits.
Such systems are in use in hospitals nationwide; the 19th-century technology is enhancd by recent refinements in pneumatic braking.
"Every day, 7,000 times a day, Stanford Hospital staff turn to pneumatic tubes, cutting-edge technology in the 19th century, for a transport network that the Internet and all the latest Silicon Valley wizardry can't match: A tubular system to transport a lab sample across the medical center in the blink of an eye.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718582</id>
	<title>Goading transporter development</title>
	<author>gsgriffin</author>
	<datestamp>1263129060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure this is just meant to poke fun at the serious scientists that are feverishly working on transporter technology so physical items can be moved instantaneously from point A to point B...unless of course, you are traveling at warp speed at present.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure this is just meant to poke fun at the serious scientists that are feverishly working on transporter technology so physical items can be moved instantaneously from point A to point B...unless of course , you are traveling at warp speed at present .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure this is just meant to poke fun at the serious scientists that are feverishly working on transporter technology so physical items can be moved instantaneously from point A to point B...unless of course, you are traveling at warp speed at present.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719790</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263143460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stray hares?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stray hares ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stray hares?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706</id>
	<title>Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear</title>
	<author>AndyGasman</author>
	<datestamp>1263122820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are pretty common in the UK, in all sort of industries.<br> <br>


Tesco supermarket uses them in some stores for moving cash to tills, and they are widely used in Hospitals.<br> <br>


There is one great, if slightly lengthy story that a friend tells, from when she was working in a hospital in Western Scotland a few years ago, I'll try to recount it best as I can.<br> <br>


A patient who has Hepatitis and Epilepsy is admitted to the hospital, he had a fit, and his Dog bit his ear off while he was fitting. So he came to hospital with his ear in his pocket.  He was treated in A&amp;E (UK ER) and sent up to the surgical department.  His Ear though was wrapped up and put in a tube, however before the doctor could tap in the destination, the pod whizzed off.  The hepatitis positive ear was not found for several days (is this just a bit error rate?), as it was quiet a big hospital with a lot of tubes.  It could have been worse, as the ear was not intended to be sown back on, but just photographed and incinerated. The doctor who put the ear in the pod was known as Stupid Dave before the incident, but I'm sure this didn't help him shake of the moniker.  The worst thing is, most people just ask what happened to the dog.<br> <br>

You don't get that with TCP/IP</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are pretty common in the UK , in all sort of industries .
Tesco supermarket uses them in some stores for moving cash to tills , and they are widely used in Hospitals .
There is one great , if slightly lengthy story that a friend tells , from when she was working in a hospital in Western Scotland a few years ago , I 'll try to recount it best as I can .
A patient who has Hepatitis and Epilepsy is admitted to the hospital , he had a fit , and his Dog bit his ear off while he was fitting .
So he came to hospital with his ear in his pocket .
He was treated in A&amp;E ( UK ER ) and sent up to the surgical department .
His Ear though was wrapped up and put in a tube , however before the doctor could tap in the destination , the pod whizzed off .
The hepatitis positive ear was not found for several days ( is this just a bit error rate ?
) , as it was quiet a big hospital with a lot of tubes .
It could have been worse , as the ear was not intended to be sown back on , but just photographed and incinerated .
The doctor who put the ear in the pod was known as Stupid Dave before the incident , but I 'm sure this did n't help him shake of the moniker .
The worst thing is , most people just ask what happened to the dog .
You do n't get that with TCP/IP</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are pretty common in the UK, in all sort of industries.
Tesco supermarket uses them in some stores for moving cash to tills, and they are widely used in Hospitals.
There is one great, if slightly lengthy story that a friend tells, from when she was working in a hospital in Western Scotland a few years ago, I'll try to recount it best as I can.
A patient who has Hepatitis and Epilepsy is admitted to the hospital, he had a fit, and his Dog bit his ear off while he was fitting.
So he came to hospital with his ear in his pocket.
He was treated in A&amp;E (UK ER) and sent up to the surgical department.
His Ear though was wrapped up and put in a tube, however before the doctor could tap in the destination, the pod whizzed off.
The hepatitis positive ear was not found for several days (is this just a bit error rate?
), as it was quiet a big hospital with a lot of tubes.
It could have been worse, as the ear was not intended to be sown back on, but just photographed and incinerated.
The doctor who put the ear in the pod was known as Stupid Dave before the incident, but I'm sure this didn't help him shake of the moniker.
The worst thing is, most people just ask what happened to the dog.
You don't get that with TCP/IP</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717564</id>
	<title>Re:Big supermarkets have them here.</title>
	<author>mikael</author>
	<datestamp>1263121620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nearly all the department stores did that back in the 1950's/1960's . There were no electronic cash registers, and checkout staff weren't allowed to handle money. So the customer would place their payment along with a receipt signed by the checkout clerk into a capsule. This would be sent upstairs to be processed by an accountant who would send the change back down to the checkout clerk. Just like in the movie "Brazil".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nearly all the department stores did that back in the 1950 's/1960 's .
There were no electronic cash registers , and checkout staff were n't allowed to handle money .
So the customer would place their payment along with a receipt signed by the checkout clerk into a capsule .
This would be sent upstairs to be processed by an accountant who would send the change back down to the checkout clerk .
Just like in the movie " Brazil " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nearly all the department stores did that back in the 1950's/1960's .
There were no electronic cash registers, and checkout staff weren't allowed to handle money.
So the customer would place their payment along with a receipt signed by the checkout clerk into a capsule.
This would be sent upstairs to be processed by an accountant who would send the change back down to the checkout clerk.
Just like in the movie "Brazil".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30733142</id>
	<title>Re:Used in other places, too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263229320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>fertile ground for a man-in-the-middle attack</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>fertile ground for a man-in-the-middle attack</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fertile ground for a man-in-the-middle attack</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718708</id>
	<title>Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either</title>
	<author>jbengt</author>
	<datestamp>1263130380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's actually pretty common in controls work.  Though digital controls have been slowly replacing pneumatic over the last 20 years, there's still quite a few places that use pneumatic controls, including analog and digital functions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's actually pretty common in controls work .
Though digital controls have been slowly replacing pneumatic over the last 20 years , there 's still quite a few places that use pneumatic controls , including analog and digital functions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's actually pretty common in controls work.
Though digital controls have been slowly replacing pneumatic over the last 20 years, there's still quite a few places that use pneumatic controls, including analog and digital functions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718830</id>
	<title>Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing</title>
	<author>mr\_matticus</author>
	<datestamp>1263131880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not?  Possibly because of the following:</p><p>1) The energy required to transport "packets" of hot water is many, many times greater than the losses through the hot water pipes.</p><p>2) The cost of building such a system would exceed any logical benefit; adding a large-diameter pipe system would occupy considerable space and would require some (presumably mechanized) system for sorting, draining, and filling the containers (as well as isolating waste water containers from the others) in a space-consuming "sorting room".</p><p>3) Each shower, sink, and drain in the building would require a large accumulation tank, since it would take multiple "packets" to flush a toilet, and storing enough hot water for even a brief shower would require many, many trips through the system.  Any drain reservoir that filled faster than the system could empty it would back up into the sink/toilet/bathtub.  The largest conceivable container to fit into a typical building could hold about a gallon of water and would be twice the size of the system used at banks--it certainly wouldn't fit inside a standard wall and would require a special breakout conduit.</p><p>4) For home use, building a sufficiently complex system would simply be impossible--all water flow would stop while your "packets" were en route to other destinations.  There is no conceivable way to build bypass structures and waiting areas sufficient to allow multiple taps to work simultaneously at an acceptable refill rate.</p><p>5) Given the necessary locations for most of the accumulation tanks, you would need active pumps to run most faucets--the system would not function on water pressure alone as it does now.  This adds cost, complexity, and new failure modes.  Power outage?  There goes the toilets.</p><p>The whole idea is a Rube.  If the relatively small losses in the hot water pipes concern you, build a home with insulated hot water pipes.  Add a central vac if you like.  The end result will be cheaper, more efficient, and 99\% less insane.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not ?
Possibly because of the following : 1 ) The energy required to transport " packets " of hot water is many , many times greater than the losses through the hot water pipes.2 ) The cost of building such a system would exceed any logical benefit ; adding a large-diameter pipe system would occupy considerable space and would require some ( presumably mechanized ) system for sorting , draining , and filling the containers ( as well as isolating waste water containers from the others ) in a space-consuming " sorting room " .3 ) Each shower , sink , and drain in the building would require a large accumulation tank , since it would take multiple " packets " to flush a toilet , and storing enough hot water for even a brief shower would require many , many trips through the system .
Any drain reservoir that filled faster than the system could empty it would back up into the sink/toilet/bathtub .
The largest conceivable container to fit into a typical building could hold about a gallon of water and would be twice the size of the system used at banks--it certainly would n't fit inside a standard wall and would require a special breakout conduit.4 ) For home use , building a sufficiently complex system would simply be impossible--all water flow would stop while your " packets " were en route to other destinations .
There is no conceivable way to build bypass structures and waiting areas sufficient to allow multiple taps to work simultaneously at an acceptable refill rate.5 ) Given the necessary locations for most of the accumulation tanks , you would need active pumps to run most faucets--the system would not function on water pressure alone as it does now .
This adds cost , complexity , and new failure modes .
Power outage ?
There goes the toilets.The whole idea is a Rube .
If the relatively small losses in the hot water pipes concern you , build a home with insulated hot water pipes .
Add a central vac if you like .
The end result will be cheaper , more efficient , and 99 \ % less insane .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not?
Possibly because of the following:1) The energy required to transport "packets" of hot water is many, many times greater than the losses through the hot water pipes.2) The cost of building such a system would exceed any logical benefit; adding a large-diameter pipe system would occupy considerable space and would require some (presumably mechanized) system for sorting, draining, and filling the containers (as well as isolating waste water containers from the others) in a space-consuming "sorting room".3) Each shower, sink, and drain in the building would require a large accumulation tank, since it would take multiple "packets" to flush a toilet, and storing enough hot water for even a brief shower would require many, many trips through the system.
Any drain reservoir that filled faster than the system could empty it would back up into the sink/toilet/bathtub.
The largest conceivable container to fit into a typical building could hold about a gallon of water and would be twice the size of the system used at banks--it certainly wouldn't fit inside a standard wall and would require a special breakout conduit.4) For home use, building a sufficiently complex system would simply be impossible--all water flow would stop while your "packets" were en route to other destinations.
There is no conceivable way to build bypass structures and waiting areas sufficient to allow multiple taps to work simultaneously at an acceptable refill rate.5) Given the necessary locations for most of the accumulation tanks, you would need active pumps to run most faucets--the system would not function on water pressure alone as it does now.
This adds cost, complexity, and new failure modes.
Power outage?
There goes the toilets.The whole idea is a Rube.
If the relatively small losses in the hot water pipes concern you, build a home with insulated hot water pipes.
Add a central vac if you like.
The end result will be cheaper, more efficient, and 99\% less insane.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717540</id>
	<title>Re:Futurama</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263121500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It could have happened...</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beach\_Pneumatic\_Transit</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It could have happened...http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beach \ _Pneumatic \ _Transit</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could have happened...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beach\_Pneumatic\_Transit</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718272</id>
	<title>good efficiency...</title>
	<author>normaldotcom</author>
	<datestamp>1263126540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pneumatic tubes are a bit more reliable than sample-carrying robots that are being produced for the same purpose. What's more likely to fail, a robot that autonomously navigates a hospital, avoiding humans with ultrasonic sensors, or a simple time-tested pneumatic tube system?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pneumatic tubes are a bit more reliable than sample-carrying robots that are being produced for the same purpose .
What 's more likely to fail , a robot that autonomously navigates a hospital , avoiding humans with ultrasonic sensors , or a simple time-tested pneumatic tube system ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pneumatic tubes are a bit more reliable than sample-carrying robots that are being produced for the same purpose.
What's more likely to fail, a robot that autonomously navigates a hospital, avoiding humans with ultrasonic sensors, or a simple time-tested pneumatic tube system?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719084</id>
	<title>Fun with tubes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263134820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having worked in medical field for years, I have had some fun with the tubes.  If you had extra tubes, you would send the tube(s) to "00".  They system is designed to send the tube to a station that was in need of more tubes.  Well, sometimes patient's cloths where left behind... clothes that security had no interest in keeping track of.  Such as used underwear.  "00" was the perfect way to dispose of these.  Want to 'piss off' pharmacy?  They would always get up set if body fluids where sent to their "clean" environment.  Load up a tube with a urine specimen that was not placed in a foam container and the urine specimen would explode in the tube system.  Needless to say, pharmacy would call the floor that the specimen was sent from and express their displeasure.  Sweet to wander over to another floor and send urine spec from that unit.  And let the fireworks fly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having worked in medical field for years , I have had some fun with the tubes .
If you had extra tubes , you would send the tube ( s ) to " 00 " .
They system is designed to send the tube to a station that was in need of more tubes .
Well , sometimes patient 's cloths where left behind... clothes that security had no interest in keeping track of .
Such as used underwear .
" 00 " was the perfect way to dispose of these .
Want to 'piss off ' pharmacy ?
They would always get up set if body fluids where sent to their " clean " environment .
Load up a tube with a urine specimen that was not placed in a foam container and the urine specimen would explode in the tube system .
Needless to say , pharmacy would call the floor that the specimen was sent from and express their displeasure .
Sweet to wander over to another floor and send urine spec from that unit .
And let the fireworks fly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having worked in medical field for years, I have had some fun with the tubes.
If you had extra tubes, you would send the tube(s) to "00".
They system is designed to send the tube to a station that was in need of more tubes.
Well, sometimes patient's cloths where left behind... clothes that security had no interest in keeping track of.
Such as used underwear.
"00" was the perfect way to dispose of these.
Want to 'piss off' pharmacy?
They would always get up set if body fluids where sent to their "clean" environment.
Load up a tube with a urine specimen that was not placed in a foam container and the urine specimen would explode in the tube system.
Needless to say, pharmacy would call the floor that the specimen was sent from and express their displeasure.
Sweet to wander over to another floor and send urine spec from that unit.
And let the fireworks fly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30724024</id>
	<title>Re:Used in other places, too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263229740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Costco in my hometown uses pneumatic tubes to deliver money to the back room, from the registers.  When there's too much cash in the drawer, you take the excess, stick it in a canister, it shoots off to be counted and put in the safe.  I think if somebody breaks a large bill and you're low on change, the  back room could also shoot you a canister of small bills to stock up with, but I've never seen that happen.</p></div><p>I've seen it happen.  Cashiers can request more cash and then the tube shows with more cash.  I've only seen it like twice.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Costco in my hometown uses pneumatic tubes to deliver money to the back room , from the registers .
When there 's too much cash in the drawer , you take the excess , stick it in a canister , it shoots off to be counted and put in the safe .
I think if somebody breaks a large bill and you 're low on change , the back room could also shoot you a canister of small bills to stock up with , but I 've never seen that happen.I 've seen it happen .
Cashiers can request more cash and then the tube shows with more cash .
I 've only seen it like twice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Costco in my hometown uses pneumatic tubes to deliver money to the back room, from the registers.
When there's too much cash in the drawer, you take the excess, stick it in a canister, it shoots off to be counted and put in the safe.
I think if somebody breaks a large bill and you're low on change, the  back room could also shoot you a canister of small bills to stock up with, but I've never seen that happen.I've seen it happen.
Cashiers can request more cash and then the tube shows with more cash.
I've only seen it like twice.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718066</id>
	<title>Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263125340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would I want to loose an ear?  My ears are quite alright without being set free.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would I want to loose an ear ?
My ears are quite alright without being set free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would I want to loose an ear?
My ears are quite alright without being set free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718188</id>
	<title>I just the other day got</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1263125940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A sample was sent by my staff at 10 o'clock in the morning on Friday. I got it yesterday. Why? Because it got tangled up with all these things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A sample was sent by my staff at 10 o'clock in the morning on Friday .
I got it yesterday .
Why ? Because it got tangled up with all these things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A sample was sent by my staff at 10 o'clock in the morning on Friday.
I got it yesterday.
Why? Because it got tangled up with all these things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717448</id>
	<title>Futurama</title>
	<author>mister\_playboy</author>
	<datestamp>1263120900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I look forward to the day when humans can be transported through these tubes as in <i>Futurama</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I look forward to the day when humans can be transported through these tubes as in Futurama .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I look forward to the day when humans can be transported through these tubes as in Futurama.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718576</id>
	<title>Re:Used in other places, too</title>
	<author>canajin56</author>
	<datestamp>1263129000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Costco in my hometown uses pneumatic tubes to deliver money to the back room, from the registers.  When there's too much cash in the drawer, you take the excess, stick it in a canister, it shoots off to be counted and put in the safe.  I think if somebody breaks a large bill and you're low on change, the  back room could also shoot you a canister of small bills to stock up with, but I've never seen that happen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Costco in my hometown uses pneumatic tubes to deliver money to the back room , from the registers .
When there 's too much cash in the drawer , you take the excess , stick it in a canister , it shoots off to be counted and put in the safe .
I think if somebody breaks a large bill and you 're low on change , the back room could also shoot you a canister of small bills to stock up with , but I 've never seen that happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Costco in my hometown uses pneumatic tubes to deliver money to the back room, from the registers.
When there's too much cash in the drawer, you take the excess, stick it in a canister, it shoots off to be counted and put in the safe.
I think if somebody breaks a large bill and you're low on change, the  back room could also shoot you a canister of small bills to stock up with, but I've never seen that happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719396</id>
	<title>Series of tubes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263138600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So it really is a series of tubes....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So it really is a series of tubes... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it really is a series of tubes....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30727340</id>
	<title>Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either</title>
	<author>Grishnakh</author>
	<datestamp>1263243060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Trains have been around since the early/mid 1800s, and they're still in wide use worldwide, especially for shipping large freight.  Cars and their gasoline-powered internal combustion engines have been around since the early 1900s, and aren't very different from then.  There's lots of "old" technologies still in widespread use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Trains have been around since the early/mid 1800s , and they 're still in wide use worldwide , especially for shipping large freight .
Cars and their gasoline-powered internal combustion engines have been around since the early 1900s , and are n't very different from then .
There 's lots of " old " technologies still in widespread use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trains have been around since the early/mid 1800s, and they're still in wide use worldwide, especially for shipping large freight.
Cars and their gasoline-powered internal combustion engines have been around since the early 1900s, and aren't very different from then.
There's lots of "old" technologies still in widespread use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718306</id>
	<title>Re:dont want to start here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263126900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Than you shouldn't have. That weak attempt at an obvious joke has already been taken in this article. Try something less unoriginal next time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Than you should n't have .
That weak attempt at an obvious joke has already been taken in this article .
Try something less unoriginal next time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Than you shouldn't have.
That weak attempt at an obvious joke has already been taken in this article.
Try something less unoriginal next time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718402</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263127620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used such tubes all day, every day, for several years, doing Neutron Activation Analysis. The samples were loaded three per tube, known as rabbits. They went into the slot, closed and blew down the outside wall of the building, underground, and then up into the core of our TRIGA reactor. There they got neutrons of various energies for anywhere from 0.05 to 2-3 seconds, and then they blasted back to me. Behind the shields I removed the samples and placed them at the gamma detectors--moving very fast. Counting gammas took anywhere from seconds to days, depending upon type and elements.</p><p>We proved the existence of the Northern Hemisphere ozone depletion with 800 samples, and several of my graduates got PhDs. Another project showed trade routes extant through northern Italy at the construction of the Colliseum.</p><p>Once in a while a rabbit would get stuck. A particularly hot one did, right at the corner of my lab. We timed that test so no one else was in the building, and it got so hot it wouldn't come back past the tube joint. If I hadn't known just where the 36" wrench was, the building could have been badly contaminated, and would've shut down, as in national news. I got it out without too much exposure, and was offered the job as building manager later.</p><p>Another time a sample exploded while removing it from a rabbit, showering my nose with hot dust. I still get stray hairs growing there...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used such tubes all day , every day , for several years , doing Neutron Activation Analysis .
The samples were loaded three per tube , known as rabbits .
They went into the slot , closed and blew down the outside wall of the building , underground , and then up into the core of our TRIGA reactor .
There they got neutrons of various energies for anywhere from 0.05 to 2-3 seconds , and then they blasted back to me .
Behind the shields I removed the samples and placed them at the gamma detectors--moving very fast .
Counting gammas took anywhere from seconds to days , depending upon type and elements.We proved the existence of the Northern Hemisphere ozone depletion with 800 samples , and several of my graduates got PhDs .
Another project showed trade routes extant through northern Italy at the construction of the Colliseum.Once in a while a rabbit would get stuck .
A particularly hot one did , right at the corner of my lab .
We timed that test so no one else was in the building , and it got so hot it would n't come back past the tube joint .
If I had n't known just where the 36 " wrench was , the building could have been badly contaminated , and would 've shut down , as in national news .
I got it out without too much exposure , and was offered the job as building manager later.Another time a sample exploded while removing it from a rabbit , showering my nose with hot dust .
I still get stray hairs growing there.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used such tubes all day, every day, for several years, doing Neutron Activation Analysis.
The samples were loaded three per tube, known as rabbits.
They went into the slot, closed and blew down the outside wall of the building, underground, and then up into the core of our TRIGA reactor.
There they got neutrons of various energies for anywhere from 0.05 to 2-3 seconds, and then they blasted back to me.
Behind the shields I removed the samples and placed them at the gamma detectors--moving very fast.
Counting gammas took anywhere from seconds to days, depending upon type and elements.We proved the existence of the Northern Hemisphere ozone depletion with 800 samples, and several of my graduates got PhDs.
Another project showed trade routes extant through northern Italy at the construction of the Colliseum.Once in a while a rabbit would get stuck.
A particularly hot one did, right at the corner of my lab.
We timed that test so no one else was in the building, and it got so hot it wouldn't come back past the tube joint.
If I hadn't known just where the 36" wrench was, the building could have been badly contaminated, and would've shut down, as in national news.
I got it out without too much exposure, and was offered the job as building manager later.Another time a sample exploded while removing it from a rabbit, showering my nose with hot dust.
I still get stray hairs growing there...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717670</id>
	<title>Re:whats the bandwidth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263122460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That depends on the delivery speed. Giving that a variable 'd' as time in seconds, then your bandwidth for a single card is 16 gb/d seconds. You might be able to pipeline these, so that would then depend on how fast the microSD cards could be loaded into the system. Depending on the system, the transport pods might remain in the pipes, or they might have to be inserted. Giving the loading time a variable 'l' as time in seconds, and 'n' is the number of pods you have available, then the time for one sending one card in a pod is l+d seconds. But if you have more than one microSD card and pods, then you save time by loading in subsequent pods while waiting for the previous one to be delivered.</p><p>These types of calculation are common for estimating the performance of pipelined and parallel processing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That depends on the delivery speed .
Giving that a variable 'd ' as time in seconds , then your bandwidth for a single card is 16 gb/d seconds .
You might be able to pipeline these , so that would then depend on how fast the microSD cards could be loaded into the system .
Depending on the system , the transport pods might remain in the pipes , or they might have to be inserted .
Giving the loading time a variable 'l ' as time in seconds , and 'n ' is the number of pods you have available , then the time for one sending one card in a pod is l + d seconds .
But if you have more than one microSD card and pods , then you save time by loading in subsequent pods while waiting for the previous one to be delivered.These types of calculation are common for estimating the performance of pipelined and parallel processing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That depends on the delivery speed.
Giving that a variable 'd' as time in seconds, then your bandwidth for a single card is 16 gb/d seconds.
You might be able to pipeline these, so that would then depend on how fast the microSD cards could be loaded into the system.
Depending on the system, the transport pods might remain in the pipes, or they might have to be inserted.
Giving the loading time a variable 'l' as time in seconds, and 'n' is the number of pods you have available, then the time for one sending one card in a pod is l+d seconds.
But if you have more than one microSD card and pods, then you save time by loading in subsequent pods while waiting for the previous one to be delivered.These types of calculation are common for estimating the performance of pipelined and parallel processing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30722284</id>
	<title>Re:  Fastest Sytem of All</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263221280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but how far?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but how far ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but how far?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30722516</id>
	<title>This just proves it..</title>
	<author>KaoticEvil</author>
	<datestamp>1263222360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.. the whole country is going down the tubes..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. the whole country is going down the tubes. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. the whole country is going down the tubes..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717724</id>
	<title>dont want to start here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263122940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is it like a series of tubes?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is it like a series of tubes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is it like a series of tubes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30723724</id>
	<title>Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263228240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know doctors are normal people, but <p><div class="quote"><p>The doctor who put the ear in the pod was known as Stupid Dave</p></div><p>is a scary thought.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know doctors are normal people , but The doctor who put the ear in the pod was known as Stupid Daveis a scary thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know doctors are normal people, but The doctor who put the ear in the pod was known as Stupid Daveis a scary thought.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717924</id>
	<title>Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either</title>
	<author>Discordantus</author>
	<datestamp>1263124440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The point of this article is that pneumatic tube networks are frelling cool, and they're old tech. To many persons of geeky persuasion (including me), this type of thing is fascinating.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The point of this article is that pneumatic tube networks are frelling cool , and they 're old tech .
To many persons of geeky persuasion ( including me ) , this type of thing is fascinating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The point of this article is that pneumatic tube networks are frelling cool, and they're old tech.
To many persons of geeky persuasion (including me), this type of thing is fascinating.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717414</id>
	<title>Gotta wonder which is worse ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263120780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having to blow into a tube or suck on one?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having to blow into a tube or suck on one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having to blow into a tube or suck on one?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718550</id>
	<title>Would be interesting for home plumbing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263128880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've occasionally thought it would be interesting to use this kind of technology for home plumbing. For example, when you turn on your sink and ask for hot water, instead of having a continuous flow in a pipe from the hot water heater to the sink (which wastes a lot of energy), why not use a pneumatic tube system to deliver a packet of hot water to the sink?</p><p>Note that the same tubes could be used for delivering hot water an cold water, and taking away waste water? (You'd have separate containers, of course, for fresh water and waste water).</p><p>You could do cool things with a pneumatic packet-switched water network. For instance, it would be easy to add a storage tank and route shower waster water to the tank, and then from there to the toilets for flushing.</p><p>And I bet with some clever design, you could make it so the pneumatic tube system could double as a centralized vacuum system for house cleaning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've occasionally thought it would be interesting to use this kind of technology for home plumbing .
For example , when you turn on your sink and ask for hot water , instead of having a continuous flow in a pipe from the hot water heater to the sink ( which wastes a lot of energy ) , why not use a pneumatic tube system to deliver a packet of hot water to the sink ? Note that the same tubes could be used for delivering hot water an cold water , and taking away waste water ?
( You 'd have separate containers , of course , for fresh water and waste water ) .You could do cool things with a pneumatic packet-switched water network .
For instance , it would be easy to add a storage tank and route shower waster water to the tank , and then from there to the toilets for flushing.And I bet with some clever design , you could make it so the pneumatic tube system could double as a centralized vacuum system for house cleaning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've occasionally thought it would be interesting to use this kind of technology for home plumbing.
For example, when you turn on your sink and ask for hot water, instead of having a continuous flow in a pipe from the hot water heater to the sink (which wastes a lot of energy), why not use a pneumatic tube system to deliver a packet of hot water to the sink?Note that the same tubes could be used for delivering hot water an cold water, and taking away waste water?
(You'd have separate containers, of course, for fresh water and waste water).You could do cool things with a pneumatic packet-switched water network.
For instance, it would be easy to add a storage tank and route shower waster water to the tank, and then from there to the toilets for flushing.And I bet with some clever design, you could make it so the pneumatic tube system could double as a centralized vacuum system for house cleaning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719018</id>
	<title>Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1263133800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Evidently this guy hasn't seen <a href="http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0004606/" title="imdb.com">Harry Tuttle</a> [imdb.com] at work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Evidently this guy has n't seen Harry Tuttle [ imdb.com ] at work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Evidently this guy hasn't seen Harry Tuttle [imdb.com] at work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719862</id>
	<title>Unexpected benefits</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263144420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once took a wrong turn and wandered into the pneumatics central room of a major NYC hospital on a really hot summer's day. Lingered in the doorway to take advantage of the refreshing pneumatic breeze. Never got that advantage hanging out  near any active computer hardware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once took a wrong turn and wandered into the pneumatics central room of a major NYC hospital on a really hot summer 's day .
Lingered in the doorway to take advantage of the refreshing pneumatic breeze .
Never got that advantage hanging out near any active computer hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once took a wrong turn and wandered into the pneumatics central room of a major NYC hospital on a really hot summer's day.
Lingered in the doorway to take advantage of the refreshing pneumatic breeze.
Never got that advantage hanging out  near any active computer hardware.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30723676</id>
	<title>Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing</title>
	<author>blueZ3</author>
	<datestamp>1263228060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A better bet is point-of-use heating. When my wife and I were planning the remodel of our kitchen, we decided to install an "instant hot" device to allow her to quickly and easily make tea. It's a one-gallon storage tank/heater that's located in the cupboard under the sink and has a separate faucet on the counter. It dispenses near-boiling water on demand, which means it only takes as long to make a cup of tea as it takes the tea to steep. It's also useful in a lot of other situations--when making dinners for our three year old for instance--it takes about a minute for the stove to boil the pre-heated water for macaroni and cheese<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p><p>While the heat loss through the pipes is negligible, it was worth it to us to install the device because it means not running water down the drain while waiting for it to get hot, and not waiting for the kettle to boil when making tea</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A better bet is point-of-use heating .
When my wife and I were planning the remodel of our kitchen , we decided to install an " instant hot " device to allow her to quickly and easily make tea .
It 's a one-gallon storage tank/heater that 's located in the cupboard under the sink and has a separate faucet on the counter .
It dispenses near-boiling water on demand , which means it only takes as long to make a cup of tea as it takes the tea to steep .
It 's also useful in a lot of other situations--when making dinners for our three year old for instance--it takes about a minute for the stove to boil the pre-heated water for macaroni and cheese : - ) While the heat loss through the pipes is negligible , it was worth it to us to install the device because it means not running water down the drain while waiting for it to get hot , and not waiting for the kettle to boil when making tea</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A better bet is point-of-use heating.
When my wife and I were planning the remodel of our kitchen, we decided to install an "instant hot" device to allow her to quickly and easily make tea.
It's a one-gallon storage tank/heater that's located in the cupboard under the sink and has a separate faucet on the counter.
It dispenses near-boiling water on demand, which means it only takes as long to make a cup of tea as it takes the tea to steep.
It's also useful in a lot of other situations--when making dinners for our three year old for instance--it takes about a minute for the stove to boil the pre-heated water for macaroni and cheese :-)While the heat loss through the pipes is negligible, it was worth it to us to install the device because it means not running water down the drain while waiting for it to get hot, and not waiting for the kettle to boil when making tea</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717644</id>
	<title>See... tubes are used more than we thought</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1263122220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBeyHgbHH7c" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Record chart compilation</a> [youtube.com]
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Record chart compilation [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Record chart compilation [youtube.com]
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719400</id>
	<title>Re:  Fastest Sytem of All</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263138840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Firing them from a cannon would be faster.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Firing them from a cannon would be faster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Firing them from a cannon would be faster.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717620</id>
	<title>Re:Big supermarkets have them here.</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1263122100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah they use them here in Melbourne, Australia. Makes be wonder if you could knock one up with bits from the hardware store. The pipes are easy 90mm stormwater and 100mm sewage are both available. If we go with the cheap 90mm pipe then 70mm pipe could be used for a capsule. Sealing the outside and making it reliable might be a problem. You could experiment with O rings (not for use in cold weather!) with manual lubrication using sump oil.</p><p>You would need a low pressure electric pump. Should be a few available off the shelf. Maybe I could rework my front letterbox. Saves one trip out of the house every day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah they use them here in Melbourne , Australia .
Makes be wonder if you could knock one up with bits from the hardware store .
The pipes are easy 90mm stormwater and 100mm sewage are both available .
If we go with the cheap 90mm pipe then 70mm pipe could be used for a capsule .
Sealing the outside and making it reliable might be a problem .
You could experiment with O rings ( not for use in cold weather !
) with manual lubrication using sump oil.You would need a low pressure electric pump .
Should be a few available off the shelf .
Maybe I could rework my front letterbox .
Saves one trip out of the house every day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah they use them here in Melbourne, Australia.
Makes be wonder if you could knock one up with bits from the hardware store.
The pipes are easy 90mm stormwater and 100mm sewage are both available.
If we go with the cheap 90mm pipe then 70mm pipe could be used for a capsule.
Sealing the outside and making it reliable might be a problem.
You could experiment with O rings (not for use in cold weather!
) with manual lubrication using sump oil.You would need a low pressure electric pump.
Should be a few available off the shelf.
Maybe I could rework my front letterbox.
Saves one trip out of the house every day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719142</id>
	<title>Ballantynes, ChCh, NZ</title>
	<author>nickrout</author>
	<datestamp>1263135660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was a pneumatic system up and working in Ballantynes, a department store in Christchurch NZ. When you booked something up on your account (or your mother's account LOL) they sent the paperwork to the office in these cool little tubes. It was still working well into the 80's.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a pneumatic system up and working in Ballantynes , a department store in Christchurch NZ .
When you booked something up on your account ( or your mother 's account LOL ) they sent the paperwork to the office in these cool little tubes .
It was still working well into the 80 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a pneumatic system up and working in Ballantynes, a department store in Christchurch NZ.
When you booked something up on your account (or your mother's account LOL) they sent the paperwork to the office in these cool little tubes.
It was still working well into the 80's.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30721444</id>
	<title>Re: Stool Samples</title>
	<author>bdwoolman</author>
	<datestamp>1263212340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>Memorandum</b></p><p> <b>From:</b> Pathology Laboratory
</p><p> <b>To:</b> Sixth Floor Nurses' Station
</p><p> <b>Re:</b> Stool Samples in the Pneumatic Delivery System

</p><p> Please remember to pack all stool samples in the specially designed containers. Improvised solutions are not acceptable.</p><p> Thanks in advance.</p><p>The Laboratory Guys</p><p> PS: Next time we are sending it back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Memorandum From : Pathology Laboratory To : Sixth Floor Nurses ' Station Re : Stool Samples in the Pneumatic Delivery System Please remember to pack all stool samples in the specially designed containers .
Improvised solutions are not acceptable .
Thanks in advance.The Laboratory Guys PS : Next time we are sending it back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Memorandum From: Pathology Laboratory
 To: Sixth Floor Nurses' Station
 Re: Stool Samples in the Pneumatic Delivery System

 Please remember to pack all stool samples in the specially designed containers.
Improvised solutions are not acceptable.
Thanks in advance.The Laboratory Guys PS: Next time we are sending it back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718064</id>
	<title>Re:Futurama</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263125340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course that idea was predated by countless previous sci-fi sources<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... including the Jetsons and even Dune.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course that idea was predated by countless previous sci-fi sources ... including the Jetsons and even Dune .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course that idea was predated by countless previous sci-fi sources ... including the Jetsons and even Dune.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718186</id>
	<title>Marvelous</title>
	<author>Deadstick</author>
	<datestamp>1263125940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you suppose they got the idea from the drive-through prescription lane at Walgreen's?</p><p>rj</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you suppose they got the idea from the drive-through prescription lane at Walgreen 's ? rj</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you suppose they got the idea from the drive-through prescription lane at Walgreen's?rj</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718546</id>
	<title>Re:Futurama</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1263128820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They have actually ran this in a few places around the world. Some even working on subway scale... I believe NY had a tube subway. It is unsurprisingly uncosteffective and unreliable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They have actually ran this in a few places around the world .
Some even working on subway scale... I believe NY had a tube subway .
It is unsurprisingly uncosteffective and unreliable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They have actually ran this in a few places around the world.
Some even working on subway scale... I believe NY had a tube subway.
It is unsurprisingly uncosteffective and unreliable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718328</id>
	<title>Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1263127080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be interesting to see it the other way around though - pneumatic computation.</p><p>Steam rules.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be interesting to see it the other way around though - pneumatic computation.Steam rules .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be interesting to see it the other way around though - pneumatic computation.Steam rules.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718990</id>
	<title>Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing</title>
	<author>Mr. Foogle</author>
	<datestamp>1263133620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>And I bet with some clever design, you could make it so the pneumatic tube system could double as a centralized vacuum system for house cleaning.</i></p><p>You will not be surprised to find you can purchase one for your home.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I bet with some clever design , you could make it so the pneumatic tube system could double as a centralized vacuum system for house cleaning.You will not be surprised to find you can purchase one for your home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I bet with some clever design, you could make it so the pneumatic tube system could double as a centralized vacuum system for house cleaning.You will not be surprised to find you can purchase one for your home.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718522</id>
	<title>Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either</title>
	<author>itsthebin</author>
	<datestamp>1263128580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pneumatic Computation was use in early control rooms , with fully analog computation. Adders , Sumers , Square Root Extractors , PID controllers , switches.
<br>
 3 - 15 psi to represent 0 - 100 \%
<br>
<br>
when I did my Industrial Instrumentation Apprenticeship , pneumatics was a large part , and in some explosive enviroments it is still a preferred way to go.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pneumatic Computation was use in early control rooms , with fully analog computation .
Adders , Sumers , Square Root Extractors , PID controllers , switches .
3 - 15 psi to represent 0 - 100 \ % when I did my Industrial Instrumentation Apprenticeship , pneumatics was a large part , and in some explosive enviroments it is still a preferred way to go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pneumatic Computation was use in early control rooms , with fully analog computation.
Adders , Sumers , Square Root Extractors , PID controllers , switches.
3 - 15 psi to represent 0 - 100 \%


when I did my Industrial Instrumentation Apprenticeship , pneumatics was a large part , and in some explosive enviroments it is still a preferred way to go.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717746</id>
	<title>potential for paltry puns</title>
	<author>maiki</author>
	<datestamp>1263123060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My hobby: looking for opportunities to use low-frequency adjectives in bad puns:

<ul>
<li>That's a tubular pneumatic delivery system, man!</li><li>Dude, that's a wicked candle!</li><li>That flipping gymnast from China won gold.</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>My hobby : looking for opportunities to use low-frequency adjectives in bad puns : That 's a tubular pneumatic delivery system , man ! Dude , that 's a wicked candle ! That flipping gymnast from China won gold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My hobby: looking for opportunities to use low-frequency adjectives in bad puns:


That's a tubular pneumatic delivery system, man!Dude, that's a wicked candle!That flipping gymnast from China won gold.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717922</id>
	<title>More breaking news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263124440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><ul>
<li>carriage runs on iron tracks, pulled by locomotive vehicle!</li>
<li>horseless carriage transports people at over 30 miles an hour!!</li>
<li>heavier-than-air vehicle flies through air!!!</li>
<li>houses and even whole streets illuminated by globes powered by "electricity"!!!!</li>
<li>human voice made audible at a distance over copper wires!!!!!</li>
<li>... etc<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</li>
</ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>carriage runs on iron tracks , pulled by locomotive vehicle !
horseless carriage transports people at over 30 miles an hour ! !
heavier-than-air vehicle flies through air ! ! !
houses and even whole streets illuminated by globes powered by " electricity " ! ! ! !
human voice made audible at a distance over copper wires ! ! ! ! !
... etc .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
carriage runs on iron tracks, pulled by locomotive vehicle!
horseless carriage transports people at over 30 miles an hour!!
heavier-than-air vehicle flies through air!!!
houses and even whole streets illuminated by globes powered by "electricity"!!!!
human voice made audible at a distance over copper wires!!!!!
... etc ...
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720678</id>
	<title>We used to call it p-mail</title>
	<author>slickwillie</author>
	<datestamp>1263242400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in the olden days.</p><p>Not to be confused with pee-mail, messages that dogs leave for each other on trees and stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in the olden days.Not to be confused with pee-mail , messages that dogs leave for each other on trees and stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in the olden days.Not to be confused with pee-mail, messages that dogs leave for each other on trees and stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30721104</id>
	<title>Yup</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263206520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I assume they do this everywhere, but here in Texas, all of the banks use pneumatic tubing to transfer checks between customers at the drive-through "tellers" and the actual tellers in the bank. Its a pretty cool system.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I assume they do this everywhere , but here in Texas , all of the banks use pneumatic tubing to transfer checks between customers at the drive-through " tellers " and the actual tellers in the bank .
Its a pretty cool system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assume they do this everywhere, but here in Texas, all of the banks use pneumatic tubing to transfer checks between customers at the drive-through "tellers" and the actual tellers in the bank.
Its a pretty cool system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30727614</id>
	<title>Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing</title>
	<author>Grishnakh</author>
	<datestamp>1263200640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>If the relatively small losses in the hot water pipes concern you, build a home with insulated hot water pipes.</i></p><p>My idea for hot water in a custom-built house is this:</p><p>1) insulate all the hot-water pipes (seriously, the foam pipe insulation costs pennies per foot; it's ridiculous that the cheap-ass builders don't already insulate all the pipes).</p><p>2) install a solar hot water system, which heats water in the tank (80 or 120 gallon) only using heat gained from panels on the roof.  Don't use any other heat source for the tank.</p><p>3) put flash heaters in each room that needs hot water (each bathroom, and kitchen).  These instantly heat the water as it flows through.  This will eliminate the several-minute wait time for hot water when you turn on the shower, but you'll also save energy because when the hot water from the solar-heated tank finally arrives, the flash heater (with its thermostat) will stop heating the water so much.</p><p>It would cost more, obviously, but this seems like the most energy-efficient way to get hot water while also having the convenience of instant hot water.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the relatively small losses in the hot water pipes concern you , build a home with insulated hot water pipes.My idea for hot water in a custom-built house is this : 1 ) insulate all the hot-water pipes ( seriously , the foam pipe insulation costs pennies per foot ; it 's ridiculous that the cheap-ass builders do n't already insulate all the pipes ) .2 ) install a solar hot water system , which heats water in the tank ( 80 or 120 gallon ) only using heat gained from panels on the roof .
Do n't use any other heat source for the tank.3 ) put flash heaters in each room that needs hot water ( each bathroom , and kitchen ) .
These instantly heat the water as it flows through .
This will eliminate the several-minute wait time for hot water when you turn on the shower , but you 'll also save energy because when the hot water from the solar-heated tank finally arrives , the flash heater ( with its thermostat ) will stop heating the water so much.It would cost more , obviously , but this seems like the most energy-efficient way to get hot water while also having the convenience of instant hot water .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the relatively small losses in the hot water pipes concern you, build a home with insulated hot water pipes.My idea for hot water in a custom-built house is this:1) insulate all the hot-water pipes (seriously, the foam pipe insulation costs pennies per foot; it's ridiculous that the cheap-ass builders don't already insulate all the pipes).2) install a solar hot water system, which heats water in the tank (80 or 120 gallon) only using heat gained from panels on the roof.
Don't use any other heat source for the tank.3) put flash heaters in each room that needs hot water (each bathroom, and kitchen).
These instantly heat the water as it flows through.
This will eliminate the several-minute wait time for hot water when you turn on the shower, but you'll also save energy because when the hot water from the solar-heated tank finally arrives, the flash heater (with its thermostat) will stop heating the water so much.It would cost more, obviously, but this seems like the most energy-efficient way to get hot water while also having the convenience of instant hot water.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717548</id>
	<title>Pneumatic tubes used to be big in the 19th century</title>
	<author>Bender\_</author>
	<datestamp>1263121560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Both Berlin and Paris had a networks with a total length of more than 400km.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pneumatic\_tube" title="wikipedia.org">obvious link</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Both Berlin and Paris had a networks with a total length of more than 400km.obvious link [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Both Berlin and Paris had a networks with a total length of more than 400km.obvious link [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718710</id>
	<title>paraphrase</title>
	<author>The Mighty Buzzard</author>
	<datestamp>1263130380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Never underestimate the bandwidth of a pneumatic tube shuttle full of thumbdrives.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Never underestimate the bandwidth of a pneumatic tube shuttle full of thumbdrives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never underestimate the bandwidth of a pneumatic tube shuttle full of thumbdrives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718910</id>
	<title>Re:Used in other places, too</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1263132660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This system also keeps the oxycodone separate fro the armed robbers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This system also keeps the oxycodone separate fro the armed robbers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This system also keeps the oxycodone separate fro the armed robbers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718828</id>
	<title>Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing</title>
	<author>scottv67</author>
	<datestamp>1263131880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>&gt;

I've occasionally thought it would be interesting to use this kind of technology for home plumbing. For example, when you turn on your sink and ask for hot water, instead of having a continuous flow in a pipe from the hot water heater to the sink (which wastes a lot of energy), why not use a pneumatic tube system to deliver a packet of hot water to the sink?</i> <br> <br>

Are you fucking high?<br> <br>

<i>&gt;Note that the same tubes could be used for delivering hot water an cold water, and taking away waste water? (You'd have separate containers, of course, for fresh water and waste water).</i> <br> <br>

Are you fucking high?<br> <br>

<i>&gt;You could do cool things with a pneumatic packet-switched water network. For instance, it would be easy to add a storage tank and route shower waster water to the tank, and then from there to the toilets for flushing.</i> <br> <br>

Are you fucking high?<br> <br>

<i>&gt;And I bet with some clever design, you could make it so the pneumatic tube system could double as a centralized vacuum system for house cleaning.</i> <br> <br>
Seriously, are you fucking high?</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I 've occasionally thought it would be interesting to use this kind of technology for home plumbing .
For example , when you turn on your sink and ask for hot water , instead of having a continuous flow in a pipe from the hot water heater to the sink ( which wastes a lot of energy ) , why not use a pneumatic tube system to deliver a packet of hot water to the sink ?
Are you fucking high ?
&gt; Note that the same tubes could be used for delivering hot water an cold water , and taking away waste water ?
( You 'd have separate containers , of course , for fresh water and waste water ) .
Are you fucking high ?
&gt; You could do cool things with a pneumatic packet-switched water network .
For instance , it would be easy to add a storage tank and route shower waster water to the tank , and then from there to the toilets for flushing .
Are you fucking high ?
&gt; And I bet with some clever design , you could make it so the pneumatic tube system could double as a centralized vacuum system for house cleaning .
Seriously , are you fucking high ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;

I've occasionally thought it would be interesting to use this kind of technology for home plumbing.
For example, when you turn on your sink and ask for hot water, instead of having a continuous flow in a pipe from the hot water heater to the sink (which wastes a lot of energy), why not use a pneumatic tube system to deliver a packet of hot water to the sink?
Are you fucking high?
&gt;Note that the same tubes could be used for delivering hot water an cold water, and taking away waste water?
(You'd have separate containers, of course, for fresh water and waste water).
Are you fucking high?
&gt;You could do cool things with a pneumatic packet-switched water network.
For instance, it would be easy to add a storage tank and route shower waster water to the tank, and then from there to the toilets for flushing.
Are you fucking high?
&gt;And I bet with some clever design, you could make it so the pneumatic tube system could double as a centralized vacuum system for house cleaning.
Seriously, are you fucking high?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720642</id>
	<title>The Wheel</title>
	<author>eyendall</author>
	<datestamp>1263241980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>was invented, discovered, constructed centuries ago but we still find it useful, indispensible. What is surprising about the pneumatic tube system remaining useful?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>was invented , discovered , constructed centuries ago but we still find it useful , indispensible .
What is surprising about the pneumatic tube system remaining useful ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>was invented, discovered, constructed centuries ago but we still find it useful, indispensible.
What is surprising about the pneumatic tube system remaining useful?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719814</id>
	<title>Re:  Fastest Sytem of All</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263143940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remember that these tube systems are about 100mm in diameter, and a DVD is more like 120mm.</p><p>Just be sure to bend your DVDs in half and they will fit!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember that these tube systems are about 100mm in diameter , and a DVD is more like 120mm.Just be sure to bend your DVDs in half and they will fit !
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember that these tube systems are about 100mm in diameter, and a DVD is more like 120mm.Just be sure to bend your DVDs in half and they will fit!
:D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30723598</id>
	<title>I worked at a place that made these things!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263227640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I worked at H-P Products (http://www.hpproducts.net) in High School. Great place. They specialize in tubular products -- which meant that they would manufacture everything from BMW after-market exhausts &amp; roll-bars, to central vacuum systems, Viper seat frames, Corvette Intake manifolds, and... they were the OEM for all these Diebold pneumatic carrier systems you see at bank drive-ups.</p><p>We had pneumatic tubes all over the big factory, from every department, from the first floor to second floor in the offices, and even -under-the-street- for a 300+ yard run to the small factory. Even though this was mostly a straight-shot under the parking lot, picnic tables, street, and into the factory, I could not out-run the tube.</p><p>The R&amp;D room in the small factory was where they tested new pneumatics. Totally cool. I saw the (current, then 'next') generation of switching systems being tested while I worked there. They had an 8x8 multiplexed, full-duplex terminal system that could handle multiple payloads per tube over two tubes. Really fricken' cool.</p><p>You could try to make your own at home, and shoot, I'd encourage it, but have fun trying to figure out how to bend PVC or ABS without deforming / collapsing the tube. Hint: Get your compressor ready, and be prepared to violate patents.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I worked at H-P Products ( http : //www.hpproducts.net ) in High School .
Great place .
They specialize in tubular products -- which meant that they would manufacture everything from BMW after-market exhausts &amp; roll-bars , to central vacuum systems , Viper seat frames , Corvette Intake manifolds , and... they were the OEM for all these Diebold pneumatic carrier systems you see at bank drive-ups.We had pneumatic tubes all over the big factory , from every department , from the first floor to second floor in the offices , and even -under-the-street- for a 300 + yard run to the small factory .
Even though this was mostly a straight-shot under the parking lot , picnic tables , street , and into the factory , I could not out-run the tube.The R&amp;D room in the small factory was where they tested new pneumatics .
Totally cool .
I saw the ( current , then 'next ' ) generation of switching systems being tested while I worked there .
They had an 8x8 multiplexed , full-duplex terminal system that could handle multiple payloads per tube over two tubes .
Really fricken ' cool.You could try to make your own at home , and shoot , I 'd encourage it , but have fun trying to figure out how to bend PVC or ABS without deforming / collapsing the tube .
Hint : Get your compressor ready , and be prepared to violate patents .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I worked at H-P Products (http://www.hpproducts.net) in High School.
Great place.
They specialize in tubular products -- which meant that they would manufacture everything from BMW after-market exhausts &amp; roll-bars, to central vacuum systems, Viper seat frames, Corvette Intake manifolds, and... they were the OEM for all these Diebold pneumatic carrier systems you see at bank drive-ups.We had pneumatic tubes all over the big factory, from every department, from the first floor to second floor in the offices, and even -under-the-street- for a 300+ yard run to the small factory.
Even though this was mostly a straight-shot under the parking lot, picnic tables, street, and into the factory, I could not out-run the tube.The R&amp;D room in the small factory was where they tested new pneumatics.
Totally cool.
I saw the (current, then 'next') generation of switching systems being tested while I worked there.
They had an 8x8 multiplexed, full-duplex terminal system that could handle multiple payloads per tube over two tubes.
Really fricken' cool.You could try to make your own at home, and shoot, I'd encourage it, but have fun trying to figure out how to bend PVC or ABS without deforming / collapsing the tube.
Hint: Get your compressor ready, and be prepared to violate patents.
:-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717642</id>
	<title>Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263122220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But with the new PIZZA MAKER 3000, you will be downloading your own pizzas in the blink of an eye!</p><p>Our new patented system will transmit the energy across your regular phone line, no need for a special line.<br>And thanks to the lovely people at CERN, a portable blackhole generator is then used to convert this energy in to mass ready to be assembled in to whatever pizza you can think of, from pineapple and pepperoni to plain old classical cheese.</p><p>Now yours for only $24,999.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But with the new PIZZA MAKER 3000 , you will be downloading your own pizzas in the blink of an eye ! Our new patented system will transmit the energy across your regular phone line , no need for a special line.And thanks to the lovely people at CERN , a portable blackhole generator is then used to convert this energy in to mass ready to be assembled in to whatever pizza you can think of , from pineapple and pepperoni to plain old classical cheese.Now yours for only $ 24,999 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But with the new PIZZA MAKER 3000, you will be downloading your own pizzas in the blink of an eye!Our new patented system will transmit the energy across your regular phone line, no need for a special line.And thanks to the lovely people at CERN, a portable blackhole generator is then used to convert this energy in to mass ready to be assembled in to whatever pizza you can think of, from pineapple and pepperoni to plain old classical cheese.Now yours for only $24,999.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719558</id>
	<title>Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear</title>
	<author>lawpoop</author>
	<datestamp>1263140880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a cool story and all, and I hate to be a buzz kill, but you can still lose things with people carting them around manually. It's not like everybody knows at all times the locations of everything they've handled that day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a cool story and all , and I hate to be a buzz kill , but you can still lose things with people carting them around manually .
It 's not like everybody knows at all times the locations of everything they 've handled that day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a cool story and all, and I hate to be a buzz kill, but you can still lose things with people carting them around manually.
It's not like everybody knows at all times the locations of everything they've handled that day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719850</id>
	<title>Re:Used in other places, too</title>
	<author>Mr. Freeman</author>
	<datestamp>1263144360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've also seen this in every home depot I've ever been in.  Although, I'm not sure if they're used anymore.  When I was little I used to see them used and get jammed on a regular basis so I suspect they may have stopped using them but don't want to spend the money to remove them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've also seen this in every home depot I 've ever been in .
Although , I 'm not sure if they 're used anymore .
When I was little I used to see them used and get jammed on a regular basis so I suspect they may have stopped using them but do n't want to spend the money to remove them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've also seen this in every home depot I've ever been in.
Although, I'm not sure if they're used anymore.
When I was little I used to see them used and get jammed on a regular basis so I suspect they may have stopped using them but don't want to spend the money to remove them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30741216</id>
	<title>Re:  Fastest Sytem of All</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1263326940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>you can pump data faster than on any type of existing system of delivery.</i></p><p>yeah, but the latency is a bitch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you can pump data faster than on any type of existing system of delivery.yeah , but the latency is a bitch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you can pump data faster than on any type of existing system of delivery.yeah, but the latency is a bitch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718228</id>
	<title>Pub use</title>
	<author>slim</author>
	<datestamp>1263126180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Red Lion in Hunningham, Warwickshire, uses pneumatic tubes to shuttle food orders to the kitchen (the order, not the food). The tubes are transparent and take a slightly convoluted route, so it's fun to watch.</p><p>What you wouldn't expect from that, is that it's a reasonably traditional country pub in most respects...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Red Lion in Hunningham , Warwickshire , uses pneumatic tubes to shuttle food orders to the kitchen ( the order , not the food ) .
The tubes are transparent and take a slightly convoluted route , so it 's fun to watch.What you would n't expect from that , is that it 's a reasonably traditional country pub in most respects.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Red Lion in Hunningham, Warwickshire, uses pneumatic tubes to shuttle food orders to the kitchen (the order, not the food).
The tubes are transparent and take a slightly convoluted route, so it's fun to watch.What you wouldn't expect from that, is that it's a reasonably traditional country pub in most respects...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717632</id>
	<title>Fluff piece, sorta</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263122160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I found the article mildly interesting but the lack of details disappointing. They only mention things like switching points and waiting areas in passing. It would've been a great article if they'd talked about the specific tech - I know it's old tech, but most of us have had little to no exposure to it (I've been to banks that use it at their drive-through windows... that's about it). For example: there are switches; is there any sort of prioritization protocol, or are the switches simply for collision prevention?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I found the article mildly interesting but the lack of details disappointing .
They only mention things like switching points and waiting areas in passing .
It would 've been a great article if they 'd talked about the specific tech - I know it 's old tech , but most of us have had little to no exposure to it ( I 've been to banks that use it at their drive-through windows... that 's about it ) .
For example : there are switches ; is there any sort of prioritization protocol , or are the switches simply for collision prevention ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I found the article mildly interesting but the lack of details disappointing.
They only mention things like switching points and waiting areas in passing.
It would've been a great article if they'd talked about the specific tech - I know it's old tech, but most of us have had little to no exposure to it (I've been to banks that use it at their drive-through windows... that's about it).
For example: there are switches; is there any sort of prioritization protocol, or are the switches simply for collision prevention?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718184</id>
	<title>Very good but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263125940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When my youngest brother was born, about 5 years ago, the hospital had "anti-theft" anklets on the babies.  When my brother's fell off, it took over half an hour to get one from the nurses station at the end of the hall by tube, when someone could have walked there and gotten it by hand in 45 seconds.</p><p>The system is only helpful if people DON'T become dependent on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When my youngest brother was born , about 5 years ago , the hospital had " anti-theft " anklets on the babies .
When my brother 's fell off , it took over half an hour to get one from the nurses station at the end of the hall by tube , when someone could have walked there and gotten it by hand in 45 seconds.The system is only helpful if people DO N'T become dependent on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When my youngest brother was born, about 5 years ago, the hospital had "anti-theft" anklets on the babies.
When my brother's fell off, it took over half an hour to get one from the nurses station at the end of the hall by tube, when someone could have walked there and gotten it by hand in 45 seconds.The system is only helpful if people DON'T become dependent on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717832</id>
	<title>Re:Big supermarkets have them here.</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1263123660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure, if you have a lot of small objects (pills,  cash, whatever), pneumatic tubes are great.  But Stanford Hospital is using them to manage <i>data</i>.</p><p>Handwritten medical words add to costs, mistakes (as in people dying), and miscommunication. That's why the U.S. needs an electronic medical record system. I believe Finland already has one.</p><p>Stanford has just added a little speed to an obsolete system.  Rather sad for a school that has played such a big role in the development of information technology.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , if you have a lot of small objects ( pills , cash , whatever ) , pneumatic tubes are great .
But Stanford Hospital is using them to manage data.Handwritten medical words add to costs , mistakes ( as in people dying ) , and miscommunication .
That 's why the U.S. needs an electronic medical record system .
I believe Finland already has one.Stanford has just added a little speed to an obsolete system .
Rather sad for a school that has played such a big role in the development of information technology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, if you have a lot of small objects (pills,  cash, whatever), pneumatic tubes are great.
But Stanford Hospital is using them to manage data.Handwritten medical words add to costs, mistakes (as in people dying), and miscommunication.
That's why the U.S. needs an electronic medical record system.
I believe Finland already has one.Stanford has just added a little speed to an obsolete system.
Rather sad for a school that has played such a big role in the development of information technology.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717444</id>
	<title>Apparently they also carry stuff around</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1263120840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Us humans, and our ancestors, have been doing that for <b>millions</b> of years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Us humans , and our ancestors , have been doing that for millions of years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Us humans, and our ancestors, have been doing that for millions of years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720356</id>
	<title>Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing</title>
	<author>marciot</author>
	<datestamp>1263151140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>I've occasionally thought it would be interesting to use this kind of technology for home plumbing. For example, when you turn on your sink and ask for hot water, instead of having a continuous flow in a pipe from the hot water heater to the sink (which wastes a lot of energy), why not use a pneumatic tube system to deliver a packet of hot water to the sink?</i></p><p>Are you fucking high?<br>
&nbsp;</p> </div><p>I'm sure they said the same thing to the fellow who thought packet switching was better than circuit switching for a global comminications network. Maybe this guy is on to something. In addition to hot and cold water, you could get your mail delivered at the tap, along with beer, spirits or whiskey. All at the push of a button, through the magic of packet switching. Not such a crazy idea when you think about it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've occasionally thought it would be interesting to use this kind of technology for home plumbing .
For example , when you turn on your sink and ask for hot water , instead of having a continuous flow in a pipe from the hot water heater to the sink ( which wastes a lot of energy ) , why not use a pneumatic tube system to deliver a packet of hot water to the sink ? Are you fucking high ?
  I 'm sure they said the same thing to the fellow who thought packet switching was better than circuit switching for a global comminications network .
Maybe this guy is on to something .
In addition to hot and cold water , you could get your mail delivered at the tap , along with beer , spirits or whiskey .
All at the push of a button , through the magic of packet switching .
Not such a crazy idea when you think about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I've occasionally thought it would be interesting to use this kind of technology for home plumbing.
For example, when you turn on your sink and ask for hot water, instead of having a continuous flow in a pipe from the hot water heater to the sink (which wastes a lot of energy), why not use a pneumatic tube system to deliver a packet of hot water to the sink?Are you fucking high?
  I'm sure they said the same thing to the fellow who thought packet switching was better than circuit switching for a global comminications network.
Maybe this guy is on to something.
In addition to hot and cold water, you could get your mail delivered at the tap, along with beer, spirits or whiskey.
All at the push of a button, through the magic of packet switching.
Not such a crazy idea when you think about it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717808</id>
	<title>also functions as as hort range time machine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263123480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>at the hospital at which I worked, you could select the origin station as the destination, and the tube system would dutifully take the carrier all the way around and back. so you could send yourself something, and receive it a few minutes later. I loved sending stuff to myself in the (near) future.</htmltext>
<tokenext>at the hospital at which I worked , you could select the origin station as the destination , and the tube system would dutifully take the carrier all the way around and back .
so you could send yourself something , and receive it a few minutes later .
I loved sending stuff to myself in the ( near ) future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at the hospital at which I worked, you could select the origin station as the destination, and the tube system would dutifully take the carrier all the way around and back.
so you could send yourself something, and receive it a few minutes later.
I loved sending stuff to myself in the (near) future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717768</id>
	<title>Re:Big supermarkets have them here.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263123240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I work for a large supermarket chain in the United States Midwest region, and many of our stores own an associated gas station out on the edge of the parking lot. The gas stations do not have their own safe or money storage; instead, gas station clerks send and receive money from the main store safe via pneumatic tube.</p><p>Unlike hospitals or pharmacies, though, our pneumatic tubes go outside the store and underneath the parking lot. I have heard of incidents where the underground tube will cave in or otherwise become blocked, and they'll have to dig up the parking lot to get the lost tube back. I was speaking with a member of our company's IT staff recently, who told me that over the years of building the tubes, the company has discovered that the tubes built under the parking lot in the winter generally fail more frequently than the tubes built in the summer.</p><p>In fact, the company has recently abandoned the pneumatic tube in favor of giving new gas stations their own safe and cash deposit system - and stores that experience a tube failure are getting a new safe put in instead of getting their tube repaired. I often wonder what happens if (when?) our pneumatic tube fails. Our tube typically carries around $500 at a time underneath the parking lot. If we lose a tube with money underneath the parking lot and are then destined to receive a new safe out at our gas station, will they bother to dig it up? Or will they just say that rescuing that $500 tube is not worth the cost of digging up the parking lot, and leave the cash to rot away?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I work for a large supermarket chain in the United States Midwest region , and many of our stores own an associated gas station out on the edge of the parking lot .
The gas stations do not have their own safe or money storage ; instead , gas station clerks send and receive money from the main store safe via pneumatic tube.Unlike hospitals or pharmacies , though , our pneumatic tubes go outside the store and underneath the parking lot .
I have heard of incidents where the underground tube will cave in or otherwise become blocked , and they 'll have to dig up the parking lot to get the lost tube back .
I was speaking with a member of our company 's IT staff recently , who told me that over the years of building the tubes , the company has discovered that the tubes built under the parking lot in the winter generally fail more frequently than the tubes built in the summer.In fact , the company has recently abandoned the pneumatic tube in favor of giving new gas stations their own safe and cash deposit system - and stores that experience a tube failure are getting a new safe put in instead of getting their tube repaired .
I often wonder what happens if ( when ?
) our pneumatic tube fails .
Our tube typically carries around $ 500 at a time underneath the parking lot .
If we lose a tube with money underneath the parking lot and are then destined to receive a new safe out at our gas station , will they bother to dig it up ?
Or will they just say that rescuing that $ 500 tube is not worth the cost of digging up the parking lot , and leave the cash to rot away ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I work for a large supermarket chain in the United States Midwest region, and many of our stores own an associated gas station out on the edge of the parking lot.
The gas stations do not have their own safe or money storage; instead, gas station clerks send and receive money from the main store safe via pneumatic tube.Unlike hospitals or pharmacies, though, our pneumatic tubes go outside the store and underneath the parking lot.
I have heard of incidents where the underground tube will cave in or otherwise become blocked, and they'll have to dig up the parking lot to get the lost tube back.
I was speaking with a member of our company's IT staff recently, who told me that over the years of building the tubes, the company has discovered that the tubes built under the parking lot in the winter generally fail more frequently than the tubes built in the summer.In fact, the company has recently abandoned the pneumatic tube in favor of giving new gas stations their own safe and cash deposit system - and stores that experience a tube failure are getting a new safe put in instead of getting their tube repaired.
I often wonder what happens if (when?
) our pneumatic tube fails.
Our tube typically carries around $500 at a time underneath the parking lot.
If we lose a tube with money underneath the parking lot and are then destined to receive a new safe out at our gas station, will they bother to dig it up?
Or will they just say that rescuing that $500 tube is not worth the cost of digging up the parking lot, and leave the cash to rot away?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717510</id>
	<title>I bet they use fire too</title>
	<author>kevin lyda</author>
	<datestamp>1263121320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is this news?  Seriously, old technology lives on if it's useful.  Even sometimes if it's not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this news ?
Seriously , old technology lives on if it 's useful .
Even sometimes if it 's not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this news?
Seriously, old technology lives on if it's useful.
Even sometimes if it's not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717524</id>
	<title>Re:Big supermarkets have them here.</title>
	<author>zlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1263121440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But what if someone hacks the system, do something like a man-in-the-middle attack and starts intercepting money transactions?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But what if someone hacks the system , do something like a man-in-the-middle attack and starts intercepting money transactions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But what if someone hacks the system, do something like a man-in-the-middle attack and starts intercepting money transactions?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720956</id>
	<title>New business model.  The next online revolution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263204180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The interesting thing here is that one could potentially invent a whole new business model of delivery of goods instead of bits.  One could imagine wiring up one of the skyscrapers so that the retail stores have a tube connection to one's apartment.  Want dinner?  Order it online and have it tubed.  Want to try a dress?  Tube it.  Want to return a dress?  Tube it.  How about a quart of milk?  The possibilities are endless.  Shopping will become more convenient and also more JIT.  You'd think retailers would kill to have a direct pipe to your apartment.  Should work in NY or SF.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The interesting thing here is that one could potentially invent a whole new business model of delivery of goods instead of bits .
One could imagine wiring up one of the skyscrapers so that the retail stores have a tube connection to one 's apartment .
Want dinner ?
Order it online and have it tubed .
Want to try a dress ?
Tube it .
Want to return a dress ?
Tube it .
How about a quart of milk ?
The possibilities are endless .
Shopping will become more convenient and also more JIT .
You 'd think retailers would kill to have a direct pipe to your apartment .
Should work in NY or SF .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The interesting thing here is that one could potentially invent a whole new business model of delivery of goods instead of bits.
One could imagine wiring up one of the skyscrapers so that the retail stores have a tube connection to one's apartment.
Want dinner?
Order it online and have it tubed.
Want to try a dress?
Tube it.
Want to return a dress?
Tube it.
How about a quart of milk?
The possibilities are endless.
Shopping will become more convenient and also more JIT.
You'd think retailers would kill to have a direct pipe to your apartment.
Should work in NY or SF.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719000</id>
	<title>It is a series of tubes after all!!!</title>
	<author>itsybitsy</author>
	<datestamp>1263133680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the old fuddy duddy guy was right after all! John Stewart, eat your words!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the old fuddy duddy guy was right after all !
John Stewart , eat your words !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the old fuddy duddy guy was right after all!
John Stewart, eat your words!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719576</id>
	<title>Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263141180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That story was quite earie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That story was quite earie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That story was quite earie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717898</id>
	<title>I want McDonald's by tube</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263124200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know its nice to see this technology used for something other than a stupid bank.  I'd love to see this used for fast food.  I could deff see McDonald's, Burger King, and/or Taco Bell easily fitting into an over-sized tube and making it to the house in a jiff.  I don't know how well pizza would work unless its like a pizza sub.  As far as drinks are concerned I'd think that they would come up with some method to keep drinks from spilling, ie: develop a new type of cup.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know its nice to see this technology used for something other than a stupid bank .
I 'd love to see this used for fast food .
I could deff see McDonald 's , Burger King , and/or Taco Bell easily fitting into an over-sized tube and making it to the house in a jiff .
I do n't know how well pizza would work unless its like a pizza sub .
As far as drinks are concerned I 'd think that they would come up with some method to keep drinks from spilling , ie : develop a new type of cup .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know its nice to see this technology used for something other than a stupid bank.
I'd love to see this used for fast food.
I could deff see McDonald's, Burger King, and/or Taco Bell easily fitting into an over-sized tube and making it to the house in a jiff.
I don't know how well pizza would work unless its like a pizza sub.
As far as drinks are concerned I'd think that they would come up with some method to keep drinks from spilling, ie: develop a new type of cup.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30725426</id>
	<title>Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing</title>
	<author>eth1</author>
	<datestamp>1263235560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to mention that plumbing already essentially IS a "pneumatic" tube system. It just happens that the payload and the propellant are the same thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention that plumbing already essentially IS a " pneumatic " tube system .
It just happens that the payload and the propellant are the same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention that plumbing already essentially IS a "pneumatic" tube system.
It just happens that the payload and the propellant are the same thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720010</id>
	<title>Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either</title>
	<author>dgatwood</author>
	<datestamp>1263146520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The point of this article is that pneumatic tube networks are frelling cool, and they're old tech. To many persons of geeky persuasion (including me), this type of thing is fascinating.</p></div></blockquote><p>Yeah, this just inspired me.  When I build a house, I think I'm going to put in a pneumatic tube network.  And I think I'm going to build a super-sized refrigerator with a robot arm.  I think you can see where this is going....</p><p>Computer, make me a sammich.</p><p>bzzt, bzzt, bzzt, bzzt.  Thuck... ssssssshhhhhhhhhhh... thuck.</p><p>Mmmm.</p><p>Orange juice, please.</p><p>Bzzzzt.  Clunk.  Bzzzzzzzzzzzzt.   Clunk.  Bzt. Thuck... ssssshhhhh... thuck.</p><p>*Pours into glass, places OJ bottle back into canister*</p><p>Thuck... ssssssssshhhhhhh... thuck.  Bzzt. Clunk.  Bzzzzzzzzzzzt.  Clunk.  Bzzzzt.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The point of this article is that pneumatic tube networks are frelling cool , and they 're old tech .
To many persons of geeky persuasion ( including me ) , this type of thing is fascinating.Yeah , this just inspired me .
When I build a house , I think I 'm going to put in a pneumatic tube network .
And I think I 'm going to build a super-sized refrigerator with a robot arm .
I think you can see where this is going....Computer , make me a sammich.bzzt , bzzt , bzzt , bzzt .
Thuck... ssssssshhhhhhhhhhh... thuck.Mmmm.Orange juice , please.Bzzzzt .
Clunk. Bzzzzzzzzzzzzt .
Clunk. Bzt .
Thuck... ssssshhhhh.. .
thuck. * Pours into glass , places OJ bottle back into canister * Thuck... ssssssssshhhhhhh... thuck .
Bzzt. Clunk .
Bzzzzzzzzzzzt. Clunk .
Bzzzzt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The point of this article is that pneumatic tube networks are frelling cool, and they're old tech.
To many persons of geeky persuasion (including me), this type of thing is fascinating.Yeah, this just inspired me.
When I build a house, I think I'm going to put in a pneumatic tube network.
And I think I'm going to build a super-sized refrigerator with a robot arm.
I think you can see where this is going....Computer, make me a sammich.bzzt, bzzt, bzzt, bzzt.
Thuck... ssssssshhhhhhhhhhh... thuck.Mmmm.Orange juice, please.Bzzzzt.
Clunk.  Bzzzzzzzzzzzzt.
Clunk.  Bzt.
Thuck... ssssshhhhh...
thuck.*Pours into glass, places OJ bottle back into canister*Thuck... ssssssssshhhhhhh... thuck.
Bzzt. Clunk.
Bzzzzzzzzzzzt.  Clunk.
Bzzzzt.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30722270</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>fotoguzzi</author>
	<datestamp>1263221220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Irradiation by epithermal neutrons was performed using the pneumatic facility of the Triga Reactor, at the University of Texas at Austin, for all the samples.</i> <br>
<br>
From: <b>Halogen determination in Arctic aerosols by neutron activation analysis with...</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>Irradiation by epithermal neutrons was performed using the pneumatic facility of the Triga Reactor , at the University of Texas at Austin , for all the samples .
From : Halogen determination in Arctic aerosols by neutron activation analysis with.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Irradiation by epithermal neutrons was performed using the pneumatic facility of the Triga Reactor, at the University of Texas at Austin, for all the samples.
From: Halogen determination in Arctic aerosols by neutron activation analysis with...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719112</id>
	<title>Stanford Hospital nearly killed me</title>
	<author>teac77</author>
	<datestamp>1263135120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stanford Hospital nearly killed me:

I received cyberknife surgery from them.  A few months later, I was in severe pain, not understanding what was wrong.  Over the phone, they prescribed me decadron, without addressing the great pain I was in.

That medicine, coupled with severe pain, almost killed me.  I have lost all respect for them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stanford Hospital nearly killed me : I received cyberknife surgery from them .
A few months later , I was in severe pain , not understanding what was wrong .
Over the phone , they prescribed me decadron , without addressing the great pain I was in .
That medicine , coupled with severe pain , almost killed me .
I have lost all respect for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stanford Hospital nearly killed me:

I received cyberknife surgery from them.
A few months later, I was in severe pain, not understanding what was wrong.
Over the phone, they prescribed me decadron, without addressing the great pain I was in.
That medicine, coupled with severe pain, almost killed me.
I have lost all respect for them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718380</id>
	<title>19th-century technology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263127440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it works, why replace it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it works , why replace it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it works, why replace it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718226</id>
	<title>Fastest Sytem of All</title>
	<author>b4upoo</author>
	<datestamp>1263126180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>       Place a stack of DVDs in a pneumatic device and you can pump data faster than on any type of existing system of delivery.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Place a stack of DVDs in a pneumatic device and you can pump data faster than on any type of existing system of delivery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>       Place a stack of DVDs in a pneumatic device and you can pump data faster than on any type of existing system of delivery.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30730182</id>
	<title>Re:Use the same principles for airports?</title>
	<author>lazarusdishwasher</author>
	<datestamp>1263210000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Denver had some problems implementing the idea.<br> <a href="http://users.csc.calpoly.edu/~dstearns/SchlohProject/csc463.html" title="calpoly.edu" rel="nofollow">http://users.csc.calpoly.edu/~dstearns/SchlohProject/csc463.html</a> [calpoly.edu]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Denver had some problems implementing the idea .
http : //users.csc.calpoly.edu/ ~ dstearns/SchlohProject/csc463.html [ calpoly.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Denver had some problems implementing the idea.
http://users.csc.calpoly.edu/~dstearns/SchlohProject/csc463.html [calpoly.edu]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30723862</id>
	<title>Re:Used in other places, too</title>
	<author>waerloga01</author>
	<datestamp>1263228900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hell. My bank has started to replace tellers with tubes inside as well as out.</p><p>So now my bank has zero personal interaction at many branches and excludes change in the tubes, requiring you to use their change machine that takes a percentage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hell .
My bank has started to replace tellers with tubes inside as well as out.So now my bank has zero personal interaction at many branches and excludes change in the tubes , requiring you to use their change machine that takes a percentage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hell.
My bank has started to replace tellers with tubes inside as well as out.So now my bank has zero personal interaction at many branches and excludes change in the tubes, requiring you to use their change machine that takes a percentage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720630</id>
	<title>Hmmmm question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263241740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I the only one that is some what distressed by the ideal of forcing air and physical containers all around a building that contains infectious diseases?</p><p>Or the thought of a urine sample leaking in the tube<nobr> <wbr></nobr>......</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one that is some what distressed by the ideal of forcing air and physical containers all around a building that contains infectious diseases ? Or the thought of a urine sample leaking in the tube ..... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one that is some what distressed by the ideal of forcing air and physical containers all around a building that contains infectious diseases?Or the thought of a urine sample leaking in the tube ......</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30721804</id>
	<title>Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear</title>
	<author>Chris Pimlott</author>
	<datestamp>1263218340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The worst thing is, most people just ask what happened to the dog.</p></div><p>I'm surprised it fit in the tube.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The worst thing is , most people just ask what happened to the dog.I 'm surprised it fit in the tube .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The worst thing is, most people just ask what happened to the dog.I'm surprised it fit in the tube.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719168</id>
	<title>Urine Luck</title>
	<author>JtCann</author>
	<datestamp>1263135960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The pneumatic tube system in the hospital i used to work at in NYC worked great. I wasnt a huge fan because idiots would sometimes send urine samples to the lab with loose caps....  not fun</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The pneumatic tube system in the hospital i used to work at in NYC worked great .
I wasnt a huge fan because idiots would sometimes send urine samples to the lab with loose caps.... not fun</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The pneumatic tube system in the hospital i used to work at in NYC worked great.
I wasnt a huge fan because idiots would sometimes send urine samples to the lab with loose caps....  not fun</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717382</id>
	<title>Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263120600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be interesting to see it the other way around though - pneumatic computation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be interesting to see it the other way around though - pneumatic computation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be interesting to see it the other way around though - pneumatic computation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719704</id>
	<title>Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear</title>
	<author>AnotherShep</author>
	<datestamp>1263142620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure you do.  The only difference is that with TCP/IP, you have to cut another ear off once you realize the first one was lost.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure you do .
The only difference is that with TCP/IP , you have to cut another ear off once you realize the first one was lost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure you do.
The only difference is that with TCP/IP, you have to cut another ear off once you realize the first one was lost.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719344</id>
	<title>Use the same principles for airports?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263138120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article was short on details but why can't we apply the basic principles to other routing of physical goods?</p><p>The math and engineering which allows large tube networks route med samples, documents, teller slips etc. could probably handle baggage at the airport.</p><p>The requirements are the same. I'm not talking about using pneumatic tubes but conveyor belts, automated carts with some human monitoring and intervention. What is the fundamental difference in the problem?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article was short on details but why ca n't we apply the basic principles to other routing of physical goods ? The math and engineering which allows large tube networks route med samples , documents , teller slips etc .
could probably handle baggage at the airport.The requirements are the same .
I 'm not talking about using pneumatic tubes but conveyor belts , automated carts with some human monitoring and intervention .
What is the fundamental difference in the problem ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article was short on details but why can't we apply the basic principles to other routing of physical goods?The math and engineering which allows large tube networks route med samples, documents, teller slips etc.
could probably handle baggage at the airport.The requirements are the same.
I'm not talking about using pneumatic tubes but conveyor belts, automated carts with some human monitoring and intervention.
What is the fundamental difference in the problem?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30727148</id>
	<title>Re:Fluff piece, sorta</title>
	<author>wilec</author>
	<datestamp>1263242580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are in our system for instance, inter zone pipes and rotary mechanical transfer units that act as multi mode staging units or switches, these systems are also capable of using zoning and inter/intra zone processes to allow for parallel operations. Priority management is controlled by several factors/settings for system wide and individual device/object/transaction level control.</p><p>I have had daily experience with a 30 something station, two zone and about two dozen transfer unit system for twenty something years. Our system is a SWISSLOGIC mid 90's tech with a low power PC running a DOS application on a RS-422 network. The DOS app runs under an OS/2 VDM or DOS, the newer versions are of course Windows applications. Even so uptime for the system is very good (99\%+), but not perfect, occasional sensor or mechanical routing/delivery components can cause hard to resolve failures. Most problems (80\%+) however are user related, non latched or inappropriately or overfilled carriers being the most common. Still the system processes about a million transactions a year 24/7/365 mostly unattended. If it fails it gets the attention of the staff before anything else except maybe HVAC, which is my primary area of responsibility of course.</p><p>matthew</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are in our system for instance , inter zone pipes and rotary mechanical transfer units that act as multi mode staging units or switches , these systems are also capable of using zoning and inter/intra zone processes to allow for parallel operations .
Priority management is controlled by several factors/settings for system wide and individual device/object/transaction level control.I have had daily experience with a 30 something station , two zone and about two dozen transfer unit system for twenty something years .
Our system is a SWISSLOGIC mid 90 's tech with a low power PC running a DOS application on a RS-422 network .
The DOS app runs under an OS/2 VDM or DOS , the newer versions are of course Windows applications .
Even so uptime for the system is very good ( 99 \ % + ) , but not perfect , occasional sensor or mechanical routing/delivery components can cause hard to resolve failures .
Most problems ( 80 \ % + ) however are user related , non latched or inappropriately or overfilled carriers being the most common .
Still the system processes about a million transactions a year 24/7/365 mostly unattended .
If it fails it gets the attention of the staff before anything else except maybe HVAC , which is my primary area of responsibility of course.matthew</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are in our system for instance, inter zone pipes and rotary mechanical transfer units that act as multi mode staging units or switches, these systems are also capable of using zoning and inter/intra zone processes to allow for parallel operations.
Priority management is controlled by several factors/settings for system wide and individual device/object/transaction level control.I have had daily experience with a 30 something station, two zone and about two dozen transfer unit system for twenty something years.
Our system is a SWISSLOGIC mid 90's tech with a low power PC running a DOS application on a RS-422 network.
The DOS app runs under an OS/2 VDM or DOS, the newer versions are of course Windows applications.
Even so uptime for the system is very good (99\%+), but not perfect, occasional sensor or mechanical routing/delivery components can cause hard to resolve failures.
Most problems (80\%+) however are user related, non latched or inappropriately or overfilled carriers being the most common.
Still the system processes about a million transactions a year 24/7/365 mostly unattended.
If it fails it gets the attention of the staff before anything else except maybe HVAC, which is my primary area of responsibility of course.matthew</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30722256</id>
	<title>Just because it's old doesn't mean it doesn't work</title>
	<author>linuxgurugamer</author>
	<datestamp>1263221160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always hear and see people who throw out, get rid of, and replace perfectly good, working equipment, just because it isn't the newest and latest.</p><p>Where I'm working right now, they are aware of this.  We are building and using systems built on the older, slower Celeron technology, becuase it's inexpensive, has a proven track record, and simply does the job.  Sure, a faster system will do the job faster.  But what's the difference between getting the job done in 1 second vs a half second?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always hear and see people who throw out , get rid of , and replace perfectly good , working equipment , just because it is n't the newest and latest.Where I 'm working right now , they are aware of this .
We are building and using systems built on the older , slower Celeron technology , becuase it 's inexpensive , has a proven track record , and simply does the job .
Sure , a faster system will do the job faster .
But what 's the difference between getting the job done in 1 second vs a half second ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always hear and see people who throw out, get rid of, and replace perfectly good, working equipment, just because it isn't the newest and latest.Where I'm working right now, they are aware of this.
We are building and using systems built on the older, slower Celeron technology, becuase it's inexpensive, has a proven track record, and simply does the job.
Sure, a faster system will do the job faster.
But what's the difference between getting the job done in 1 second vs a half second?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717568</id>
	<title>"The tube is everywhere"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263121620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one welcome our new tubular overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our new tubular overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our new tubular overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30726186</id>
	<title>Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1263239160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's also a good example of *appropriate* tech for the job at hand, which is moving small objects to and from multiple locations as rapidly as possible. It's still in use because it's efficient and cost-effective for a sprawling facility that needs to move lots of small objects.</p><p>Seems to be another benefit for money-handling is that it's relatively secure against in-transit pilferage, tho that doesn't rule out deliberate mis-routing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's also a good example of * appropriate * tech for the job at hand , which is moving small objects to and from multiple locations as rapidly as possible .
It 's still in use because it 's efficient and cost-effective for a sprawling facility that needs to move lots of small objects.Seems to be another benefit for money-handling is that it 's relatively secure against in-transit pilferage , tho that does n't rule out deliberate mis-routing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's also a good example of *appropriate* tech for the job at hand, which is moving small objects to and from multiple locations as rapidly as possible.
It's still in use because it's efficient and cost-effective for a sprawling facility that needs to move lots of small objects.Seems to be another benefit for money-handling is that it's relatively secure against in-transit pilferage, tho that doesn't rule out deliberate mis-routing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718440</id>
	<title>Re:Used in other places, too</title>
	<author>v1</author>
	<datestamp>1263127920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Some banks also use pneumatic conveyance to send currency between the counters and the vault.</i></p><p>And I'm amazed no one's mentioned the drive-up teller stations at the bank.  All the ones except the one right at the building are pneumatic with those thermos-looking tubes you stuff your checks etc into and send into the bank.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some banks also use pneumatic conveyance to send currency between the counters and the vault.And I 'm amazed no one 's mentioned the drive-up teller stations at the bank .
All the ones except the one right at the building are pneumatic with those thermos-looking tubes you stuff your checks etc into and send into the bank .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some banks also use pneumatic conveyance to send currency between the counters and the vault.And I'm amazed no one's mentioned the drive-up teller stations at the bank.
All the ones except the one right at the building are pneumatic with those thermos-looking tubes you stuff your checks etc into and send into the bank.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718430</id>
	<title>Re:Big supermarkets have them here.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263127860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Nearly all the department stores did that back in the 1950's/1960's . There were no electronic cash registers, and checkout staff weren't allowed to handle money. So the customer would place their payment along with a receipt signed by the checkout clerk into a capsule. This would be sent upstairs to be processed by an accountant who would send the change back down to the checkout clerk.</i> </p><p>Costco stores, at least here in the SF bay area, have been using tubes to move money around for years. The only difference is that they now use PVC tubes, instead of the metal ones I remember from the 40s and 50s.</p><p>I don't recall how they were used back then as I was too young.</p><p>When I worked for a major railroad in the 60s, they had an elaborate tube system which went to a hub in the mail department. There was a long, carpet-lined trough that all the tubes dumped into. There was a collar on the canister that was rotated to show the destination floor. A clerk would pick up the incoming canister, look at the indicated floor marking, then pop it into the outgoing tube for the destination floor.</p><p>Eventually this was replaced by a system in an an abandoned elevator shaft. There was a moving chain going up the shaft, over the top, then down again in a continuous loop. You put building mail into a bin destined for the mail room and pushed it out on rails to be picked up by grabbers on the chain. The bin was dumped into the mail room. After sorting, mail for different floors was put into bins with a floor indicator set on it and sent back onto the chain. Eventually it was kicked off the chain onto a ramp at the designated floor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nearly all the department stores did that back in the 1950 's/1960 's .
There were no electronic cash registers , and checkout staff were n't allowed to handle money .
So the customer would place their payment along with a receipt signed by the checkout clerk into a capsule .
This would be sent upstairs to be processed by an accountant who would send the change back down to the checkout clerk .
Costco stores , at least here in the SF bay area , have been using tubes to move money around for years .
The only difference is that they now use PVC tubes , instead of the metal ones I remember from the 40s and 50s.I do n't recall how they were used back then as I was too young.When I worked for a major railroad in the 60s , they had an elaborate tube system which went to a hub in the mail department .
There was a long , carpet-lined trough that all the tubes dumped into .
There was a collar on the canister that was rotated to show the destination floor .
A clerk would pick up the incoming canister , look at the indicated floor marking , then pop it into the outgoing tube for the destination floor.Eventually this was replaced by a system in an an abandoned elevator shaft .
There was a moving chain going up the shaft , over the top , then down again in a continuous loop .
You put building mail into a bin destined for the mail room and pushed it out on rails to be picked up by grabbers on the chain .
The bin was dumped into the mail room .
After sorting , mail for different floors was put into bins with a floor indicator set on it and sent back onto the chain .
Eventually it was kicked off the chain onto a ramp at the designated floor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nearly all the department stores did that back in the 1950's/1960's .
There were no electronic cash registers, and checkout staff weren't allowed to handle money.
So the customer would place their payment along with a receipt signed by the checkout clerk into a capsule.
This would be sent upstairs to be processed by an accountant who would send the change back down to the checkout clerk.
Costco stores, at least here in the SF bay area, have been using tubes to move money around for years.
The only difference is that they now use PVC tubes, instead of the metal ones I remember from the 40s and 50s.I don't recall how they were used back then as I was too young.When I worked for a major railroad in the 60s, they had an elaborate tube system which went to a hub in the mail department.
There was a long, carpet-lined trough that all the tubes dumped into.
There was a collar on the canister that was rotated to show the destination floor.
A clerk would pick up the incoming canister, look at the indicated floor marking, then pop it into the outgoing tube for the destination floor.Eventually this was replaced by a system in an an abandoned elevator shaft.
There was a moving chain going up the shaft, over the top, then down again in a continuous loop.
You put building mail into a bin destined for the mail room and pushed it out on rails to be picked up by grabbers on the chain.
The bin was dumped into the mail room.
After sorting, mail for different floors was put into bins with a floor indicator set on it and sent back onto the chain.
Eventually it was kicked off the chain onto a ramp at the designated floor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717994</id>
	<title>Re:Big supermarkets have them here.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263124800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, jackass, read the damn article.  They're using them to send LAB SAMPLES around the giant hospital.  Not paper.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , jackass , read the damn article .
They 're using them to send LAB SAMPLES around the giant hospital .
Not paper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, jackass, read the damn article.
They're using them to send LAB SAMPLES around the giant hospital.
Not paper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30726098</id>
	<title>Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear</title>
	<author>autophile</author>
	<datestamp>1263238740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So... um.... what uh... what happened to the dog?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So... um.... what uh... what happened to the dog ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So... um.... what uh... what happened to the dog?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719324</id>
	<title>Re:Used in other places, too</title>
	<author>socsoc</author>
	<datestamp>1263137880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know what you experience, but I live in the state capital of a major state (so we have new technology, and even old school like you are referring) and this doesn't happen.  A pharmacist still has to sign off on it, so where is the savings?

</p><p>Also, bank pneumatic devices stopped being used at least 10 years ago here, both in drive through and locally.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know what you experience , but I live in the state capital of a major state ( so we have new technology , and even old school like you are referring ) and this does n't happen .
A pharmacist still has to sign off on it , so where is the savings ?
Also , bank pneumatic devices stopped being used at least 10 years ago here , both in drive through and locally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know what you experience, but I live in the state capital of a major state (so we have new technology, and even old school like you are referring) and this doesn't happen.
A pharmacist still has to sign off on it, so where is the savings?
Also, bank pneumatic devices stopped being used at least 10 years ago here, both in drive through and locally.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717406</id>
	<title>Big supermarkets have them here.</title>
	<author>Max Romantschuk</author>
	<datestamp>1263120720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When the register has too much cash or needs change they just tube it over. There's also at least one pharmacy which has people processing prescriptions at terminals, and storage below from where the drugs are tubed over. If it works, don't fix it I say.</p><p>Oh, and here = Helsinki, Finland.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When the register has too much cash or needs change they just tube it over .
There 's also at least one pharmacy which has people processing prescriptions at terminals , and storage below from where the drugs are tubed over .
If it works , do n't fix it I say.Oh , and here = Helsinki , Finland .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When the register has too much cash or needs change they just tube it over.
There's also at least one pharmacy which has people processing prescriptions at terminals, and storage below from where the drugs are tubed over.
If it works, don't fix it I say.Oh, and here = Helsinki, Finland.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717602</id>
	<title>Re:whats the bandwidth</title>
	<author>DigiShaman</author>
	<datestamp>1263121920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's high bandwidth high latency. So in theory, you could place two 640GB notebook drives in the tube for a total of 1.28TB of data. Now lets assume that it takes 10 seconds for the tube to travel from start to finish. That would put the transfer rate at 128GB as second.</p><p>Basically, it's like sneaker-net but faster<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's high bandwidth high latency .
So in theory , you could place two 640GB notebook drives in the tube for a total of 1.28TB of data .
Now lets assume that it takes 10 seconds for the tube to travel from start to finish .
That would put the transfer rate at 128GB as second.Basically , it 's like sneaker-net but faster : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's high bandwidth high latency.
So in theory, you could place two 640GB notebook drives in the tube for a total of 1.28TB of data.
Now lets assume that it takes 10 seconds for the tube to travel from start to finish.
That would put the transfer rate at 128GB as second.Basically, it's like sneaker-net but faster :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718982</id>
	<title>A first step to using it for patients...</title>
	<author>uncqual</author>
	<datestamp>1263133560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With just a few more bends, twists, and crossover points, maybe <a href="http://www.pneumaticelevator.com/" title="pneumaticelevator.com">these guys</a> [pneumaticelevator.com] could enhance the system to carry the patients also.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With just a few more bends , twists , and crossover points , maybe these guys [ pneumaticelevator.com ] could enhance the system to carry the patients also .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With just a few more bends, twists, and crossover points, maybe these guys [pneumaticelevator.com] could enhance the system to carry the patients also.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30722176</id>
	<title>Re:Big supermarkets have them here.</title>
	<author>CGordy</author>
	<datestamp>1263220740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Small radius bends are widely used because they're compact to transport and install and easy to fit together - the absence of large radius bends is due to a lack of mainstream demand more than any difficulty in making them.</p><p>Pneumatic conveying is widely used in the petrochemical industry for powder and pelletised products.  It's relatively easy to get right, provided that the operator willing to spend the time and money to calculate the hydraulics properly, which requires quite a few hours of (expensive) engineering time.  That's not an issue in an industry when a product line blockage can result in $10M of lost revenue per day (ballpark figure), but for a building it's cheaper to bash a hole in the wall and stick a larger pipe in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Small radius bends are widely used because they 're compact to transport and install and easy to fit together - the absence of large radius bends is due to a lack of mainstream demand more than any difficulty in making them.Pneumatic conveying is widely used in the petrochemical industry for powder and pelletised products .
It 's relatively easy to get right , provided that the operator willing to spend the time and money to calculate the hydraulics properly , which requires quite a few hours of ( expensive ) engineering time .
That 's not an issue in an industry when a product line blockage can result in $ 10M of lost revenue per day ( ballpark figure ) , but for a building it 's cheaper to bash a hole in the wall and stick a larger pipe in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Small radius bends are widely used because they're compact to transport and install and easy to fit together - the absence of large radius bends is due to a lack of mainstream demand more than any difficulty in making them.Pneumatic conveying is widely used in the petrochemical industry for powder and pelletised products.
It's relatively easy to get right, provided that the operator willing to spend the time and money to calculate the hydraulics properly, which requires quite a few hours of (expensive) engineering time.
That's not an issue in an industry when a product line blockage can result in $10M of lost revenue per day (ballpark figure), but for a building it's cheaper to bash a hole in the wall and stick a larger pipe in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720586</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263241020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gordon, is that you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gordon , is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gordon, is that you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717292</id>
	<title>Used in other places, too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263120120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The ultra-modern pharmacy in the local town also uses pneumatic delivery for prescription drugs. You present your prescription at the counter, and the attendant checks it, then keys in the appropriate codes on the terminal. The pills/potion/whatever arrives via pneumatic tube while the instructions &amp; labels are being printed. This is faster then the previous method where the same attendant would have to walk off and fetch the prescription materials.<br> <br>
Some banks also use pneumatic conveyance to send currency between the counters and the vault.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The ultra-modern pharmacy in the local town also uses pneumatic delivery for prescription drugs .
You present your prescription at the counter , and the attendant checks it , then keys in the appropriate codes on the terminal .
The pills/potion/whatever arrives via pneumatic tube while the instructions &amp; labels are being printed .
This is faster then the previous method where the same attendant would have to walk off and fetch the prescription materials .
Some banks also use pneumatic conveyance to send currency between the counters and the vault .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ultra-modern pharmacy in the local town also uses pneumatic delivery for prescription drugs.
You present your prescription at the counter, and the attendant checks it, then keys in the appropriate codes on the terminal.
The pills/potion/whatever arrives via pneumatic tube while the instructions &amp; labels are being printed.
This is faster then the previous method where the same attendant would have to walk off and fetch the prescription materials.
Some banks also use pneumatic conveyance to send currency between the counters and the vault.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717518</id>
	<title>Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either</title>
	<author>newcastlejon</author>
	<datestamp>1263121320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Clearly these kids never heard of Sneakernet&#174;.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly these kids never heard of Sneakernet   .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly these kids never heard of Sneakernet®.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720366</id>
	<title>Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing</title>
	<author>Titoxd</author>
	<datestamp>1263151560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wish I had mod points. I must have pulled something laughing at this...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish I had mod points .
I must have pulled something laughing at this.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish I had mod points.
I must have pulled something laughing at this...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30721788</id>
	<title>Re:Big supermarkets have them here.</title>
	<author>Chris Pimlott</author>
	<datestamp>1263218220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really?  Where in Melbourne?  I lived in the CBD for a while and never saw one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
Where in Melbourne ?
I lived in the CBD for a while and never saw one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
Where in Melbourne?
I lived in the CBD for a while and never saw one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720274</id>
	<title>Re:Used in other places, too</title>
	<author>kramerd</author>
	<datestamp>1263150060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thats probably because everytime people go to costco, they spend about $300. You have to expect large bills if you take cash. Ignore the outliers who go to get a $3, pedantic people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats probably because everytime people go to costco , they spend about $ 300 .
You have to expect large bills if you take cash .
Ignore the outliers who go to get a $ 3 , pedantic people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats probably because everytime people go to costco, they spend about $300.
You have to expect large bills if you take cash.
Ignore the outliers who go to get a $3, pedantic people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718336</id>
	<title>Broken promises</title>
	<author>ascari</author>
	<datestamp>1263127140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They promised us high speed communication via carbon nanotubes - and this is what we got. Just like that flying car they promised.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>They promised us high speed communication via carbon nanotubes - and this is what we got .
Just like that flying car they promised .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They promised us high speed communication via carbon nanotubes - and this is what we got.
Just like that flying car they promised.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718662</id>
	<title>oh yeah?  got that beat...</title>
	<author>dAzED1</author>
	<datestamp>1263129900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every day, I get to work using 10,000 year old technology that the internet hasn't replaced yet - the wheel.  I first read about the internet using a 5500 year old invention (paper) that is still in extremely prolific use today.</p><p>What?  Huh?  There are hundreds of thousands of inventions that are in use at that hospital every minute of every day, that didn't get replaced by the internet.  Why single out this one?  Is it because, like the internet, this too is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series\_of\_tubes" title="wikipedia.org">series of tubes?"</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every day , I get to work using 10,000 year old technology that the internet has n't replaced yet - the wheel .
I first read about the internet using a 5500 year old invention ( paper ) that is still in extremely prolific use today.What ?
Huh ? There are hundreds of thousands of inventions that are in use at that hospital every minute of every day , that did n't get replaced by the internet .
Why single out this one ?
Is it because , like the internet , this too is a series of tubes ?
" [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every day, I get to work using 10,000 year old technology that the internet hasn't replaced yet - the wheel.
I first read about the internet using a 5500 year old invention (paper) that is still in extremely prolific use today.What?
Huh?  There are hundreds of thousands of inventions that are in use at that hospital every minute of every day, that didn't get replaced by the internet.
Why single out this one?
Is it because, like the internet, this too is a series of tubes?
" [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30722072</id>
	<title>another meaning</title>
	<author>jcltoday</author>
	<datestamp>1263220020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This gives the word airborne another entire meaning.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This gives the word airborne another entire meaning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This gives the word airborne another entire meaning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30742468</id>
	<title>Re:  Fastest Sytem of All</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263289440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What, faster than a stack of Bluerays in a tube?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What , faster than a stack of Bluerays in a tube ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, faster than a stack of Bluerays in a tube?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718462</id>
	<title>Very common in all hospitals</title>
	<author>neapolitan</author>
	<datestamp>1263128040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought the headline of the article was actually a joke; these systems are found in almost all major hospitals.  There are companies that will install them:</p><p><a href="http://www.swisslog.com/index/hcs-index/hcs-systems/hcs-pts/hcs-pts-translogic.htm" title="swisslog.com">http://www.swisslog.com/index/hcs-index/hcs-systems/hcs-pts/hcs-pts-translogic.htm</a> [swisslog.com]</p><p>this is an established industry, and nothing new...  Each hospital in the conglomerate that I work in uses a pneumatic tube system.</p><p>Weird that somebody picked up this Stanford "press release" and found it suitable for Slashdot...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the headline of the article was actually a joke ; these systems are found in almost all major hospitals .
There are companies that will install them : http : //www.swisslog.com/index/hcs-index/hcs-systems/hcs-pts/hcs-pts-translogic.htm [ swisslog.com ] this is an established industry , and nothing new... Each hospital in the conglomerate that I work in uses a pneumatic tube system.Weird that somebody picked up this Stanford " press release " and found it suitable for Slashdot.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the headline of the article was actually a joke; these systems are found in almost all major hospitals.
There are companies that will install them:http://www.swisslog.com/index/hcs-index/hcs-systems/hcs-pts/hcs-pts-translogic.htm [swisslog.com]this is an established industry, and nothing new...  Each hospital in the conglomerate that I work in uses a pneumatic tube system.Weird that somebody picked up this Stanford "press release" and found it suitable for Slashdot...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717880</id>
	<title>Unless it is faster to walk...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263124020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At a hospital in the Washington, DC area which uses this system, a friend of mine needed a baby-anti-theft bracelet from the next nurses station. It took 12 minutes to get there through the tube system, in which time someone could have walked over and gotten it 6+ times</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At a hospital in the Washington , DC area which uses this system , a friend of mine needed a baby-anti-theft bracelet from the next nurses station .
It took 12 minutes to get there through the tube system , in which time someone could have walked over and gotten it 6 + times</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At a hospital in the Washington, DC area which uses this system, a friend of mine needed a baby-anti-theft bracelet from the next nurses station.
It took 12 minutes to get there through the tube system, in which time someone could have walked over and gotten it 6+ times</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719978</id>
	<title>I wish we had a real worldwide series of tubes...</title>
	<author>spiffmastercow</author>
	<datestamp>1263146100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just  imagine, you'd be able to send anything anwhere at any time, as long as it fit in a pneumatic tube.  Sure, it might be slow, but unlike  UPS, where I can track my package as it sits in their warehouse for 5 days only 20 miles from my house, I could actually watch  my deliveries as they make their way to me in real time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just imagine , you 'd be able to send anything anwhere at any time , as long as it fit in a pneumatic tube .
Sure , it might be slow , but unlike UPS , where I can track my package as it sits in their warehouse for 5 days only 20 miles from my house , I could actually watch my deliveries as they make their way to me in real time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just  imagine, you'd be able to send anything anwhere at any time, as long as it fit in a pneumatic tube.
Sure, it might be slow, but unlike  UPS, where I can track my package as it sits in their warehouse for 5 days only 20 miles from my house, I could actually watch  my deliveries as they make their way to me in real time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717992</id>
	<title>Re:Big supermarkets have them here.</title>
	<author>Hadlock</author>
	<datestamp>1263124800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the biggest problem would be finding a way to reliably make those large-radius bends. Most buildings that have pneumatic systems installed usually have the "kinks" (pun intended) that have to be worked out by the installer before you end up with a reliable system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the biggest problem would be finding a way to reliably make those large-radius bends .
Most buildings that have pneumatic systems installed usually have the " kinks " ( pun intended ) that have to be worked out by the installer before you end up with a reliable system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the biggest problem would be finding a way to reliably make those large-radius bends.
Most buildings that have pneumatic systems installed usually have the "kinks" (pun intended) that have to be worked out by the installer before you end up with a reliable system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720244</id>
	<title>You whippersnappers, nowdays!</title>
	<author>cyn1c77</author>
	<datestamp>1263149640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Every day, 7,000 times a day, Stanford Hospital staff turn to pneumatic tubes, cutting-edge technology in the 19th century, for a transport network that the Internet and all the latest Silicon Valley wizardry can't match: A tubular system to transport a lab sample across the medical center in the blink of an eye."</p></div><p>This article might be interesting if you are, say, 15.  But they were (and still are) used in banks, the post office, supermarkets and anywhere else people need to transport small packages and money in a complex.  Look around next time you are out in the world and you will likely see a few of these tubes.  </p><p>How about an article on another archaic, 19th-century piece of technology that works better than any modern Silicon Valley wizardry: the internal combustion engine.  I look forward to the one about the bicycle too! </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Every day , 7,000 times a day , Stanford Hospital staff turn to pneumatic tubes , cutting-edge technology in the 19th century , for a transport network that the Internet and all the latest Silicon Valley wizardry ca n't match : A tubular system to transport a lab sample across the medical center in the blink of an eye .
" This article might be interesting if you are , say , 15 .
But they were ( and still are ) used in banks , the post office , supermarkets and anywhere else people need to transport small packages and money in a complex .
Look around next time you are out in the world and you will likely see a few of these tubes .
How about an article on another archaic , 19th-century piece of technology that works better than any modern Silicon Valley wizardry : the internal combustion engine .
I look forward to the one about the bicycle too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Every day, 7,000 times a day, Stanford Hospital staff turn to pneumatic tubes, cutting-edge technology in the 19th century, for a transport network that the Internet and all the latest Silicon Valley wizardry can't match: A tubular system to transport a lab sample across the medical center in the blink of an eye.
"This article might be interesting if you are, say, 15.
But they were (and still are) used in banks, the post office, supermarkets and anywhere else people need to transport small packages and money in a complex.
Look around next time you are out in the world and you will likely see a few of these tubes.
How about an article on another archaic, 19th-century piece of technology that works better than any modern Silicon Valley wizardry: the internal combustion engine.
I look forward to the one about the bicycle too! 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717696</id>
	<title>NASA Mission Control does too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263122700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NASA Mission Control does too.</p><p>They also use "Mr. Hand."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA Mission Control does too.They also use " Mr .
Hand. "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA Mission Control does too.They also use "Mr.
Hand."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717786</id>
	<title>all major australian supermarkets do too</title>
	<author>iamagloworm</author>
	<datestamp>1263123360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>in australia coles and woolworths as well as target and big w, etc. all use pneumatic tubs for cash.</htmltext>
<tokenext>in australia coles and woolworths as well as target and big w , etc .
all use pneumatic tubs for cash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in australia coles and woolworths as well as target and big w, etc.
all use pneumatic tubs for cash.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206</id>
	<title>Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either</title>
	<author>Gothmolly</author>
	<datestamp>1263119520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the point of this article is that physical tasks, like plumbing or carrying infected blood, can't be done electronically ?!?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the point of this article is that physical tasks , like plumbing or carrying infected blood , ca n't be done electronically ? ! ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the point of this article is that physical tasks, like plumbing or carrying infected blood, can't be done electronically ?!?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717574</id>
	<title>Ancient transportation technology is better</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1263121740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ancient transportation technology is better</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ancient transportation technology is better</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ancient transportation technology is better</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718746</id>
	<title>In use in most hospitals</title>
	<author>Vu1turEMaN</author>
	<datestamp>1263130800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They use them at Sewickley Valley Hospital in PA to send stuff around the Lab area on the 6th floor, and to send samples from the 2nd floor upstairs.</p><p>People love it. It's worth every penny.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They use them at Sewickley Valley Hospital in PA to send stuff around the Lab area on the 6th floor , and to send samples from the 2nd floor upstairs.People love it .
It 's worth every penny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They use them at Sewickley Valley Hospital in PA to send stuff around the Lab area on the 6th floor, and to send samples from the 2nd floor upstairs.People love it.
It's worth every penny.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718552</id>
	<title>Re:Futurama</title>
	<author>Dachannien</author>
	<datestamp>1263128880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I look forward to the day when various documents can be transported through these tubes, also as in Futurama.</p><p><b>Hermes:</b> <i>It's supposed to be about the filing!</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I look forward to the day when various documents can be transported through these tubes , also as in Futurama.Hermes : It 's supposed to be about the filing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I look forward to the day when various documents can be transported through these tubes, also as in Futurama.Hermes: It's supposed to be about the filing!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717452</id>
	<title>whats the bandwidth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263120960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if each capsule was packed with 16gb microSD cards ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if each capsule was packed with 16gb microSD cards ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if each capsule was packed with 16gb microSD cards ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30727148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30730182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30722284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30722270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30723724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30721788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718910
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30741216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30726186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30726098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30727340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30723862
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30733142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30742468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30724024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30723676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30721804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30725426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30727614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30722176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1958229_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717574
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717898
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717510
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30723676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718828
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720366
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718830
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30725426
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30727614
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717880
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718380
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30722256
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30727148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717602
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717568
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718710
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718662
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718306
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717548
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717292
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719324
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718440
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30723862
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718910
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718576
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30733142
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30724024
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719850
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717382
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718522
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718708
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717924
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30726186
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720010
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30727340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30742468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30722284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30741216
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30722270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30720586
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30730182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717922
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717620
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717992
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30722176
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30721788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717564
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717832
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717768
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1958229.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30717706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30726098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30723724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30719142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30721804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1958229.30718066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
