<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_10_0113248</id>
	<title>Futuristic Sex Robots Now Just "Sex Robots"</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1263128760000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.bedoper.com/" rel="nofollow">High-C</a> writes <i>"With apologies to <a href="http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Futuristic\_Sex\_Robotz">Futuristic Sex Robotz</a>, the <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/CES/high-tech-sex-porn-flirts-cutting-edge/story?id=9511040">future is here, and her name is Roxxxy</a>. <a href="http://www.truecompanion.com/">Truecompanion.com</a> has revealed their answer to the <a href="http://www.realdoll.com/">Real Doll</a>, and it looks nice. The site is short on details, pictures, pricing info, but wow."</i> NOTE: some of the above links are <em>not</em> work-safe, for many values of work. I stopped by this exhibit today at  the <a href="http://www.adultentertainmentexpo.com/">AVN Expo</a> (not officially a part of CES, but by curious coincidence scheduled to coincide; the old saw that <a href="http://www.law.indiana.edu/fclj/pubs/v49/no1/johnson.html">porn drives tech</a> isn't without merit). Roxxxy, though, was rather unsexily posed on a couch, not moving a bit &mdash; downright creepy, in fact.</htmltext>
<tokenext>High-C writes " With apologies to Futuristic Sex Robotz , the future is here , and her name is Roxxxy .
Truecompanion.com has revealed their answer to the Real Doll , and it looks nice .
The site is short on details , pictures , pricing info , but wow .
" NOTE : some of the above links are not work-safe , for many values of work .
I stopped by this exhibit today at the AVN Expo ( not officially a part of CES , but by curious coincidence scheduled to coincide ; the old saw that porn drives tech is n't without merit ) .
Roxxxy , though , was rather unsexily posed on a couch , not moving a bit    downright creepy , in fact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>High-C writes "With apologies to Futuristic Sex Robotz, the future is here, and her name is Roxxxy.
Truecompanion.com has revealed their answer to the Real Doll, and it looks nice.
The site is short on details, pictures, pricing info, but wow.
" NOTE: some of the above links are not work-safe, for many values of work.
I stopped by this exhibit today at  the AVN Expo (not officially a part of CES, but by curious coincidence scheduled to coincide; the old saw that porn drives tech isn't without merit).
Roxxxy, though, was rather unsexily posed on a couch, not moving a bit — downright creepy, in fact.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711562</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>pete-classic</author>
	<datestamp>1263048480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I feel presumptuous making a suggestion.  But you opened the door, I'm just walking through.</p><p>I highly recommend using a proper lube instead of lotion.  I like a water/glycerin/glycol product, like Astroglide.  I have a (lady) friend who likes petroleum jelly.  (Available in a tube if you go this route.  I find the tub gross.)</p><p>I think you'll find much better lubrication and sensation.  As a bonus, with the water based products cleanup is easier.</p><p>-Peter</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel presumptuous making a suggestion .
But you opened the door , I 'm just walking through.I highly recommend using a proper lube instead of lotion .
I like a water/glycerin/glycol product , like Astroglide .
I have a ( lady ) friend who likes petroleum jelly .
( Available in a tube if you go this route .
I find the tub gross .
) I think you 'll find much better lubrication and sensation .
As a bonus , with the water based products cleanup is easier.-Peter</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel presumptuous making a suggestion.
But you opened the door, I'm just walking through.I highly recommend using a proper lube instead of lotion.
I like a water/glycerin/glycol product, like Astroglide.
I have a (lady) friend who likes petroleum jelly.
(Available in a tube if you go this route.
I find the tub gross.
)I think you'll find much better lubrication and sensation.
As a bonus, with the water based products cleanup is easier.-Peter</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713064</id>
	<title>Re:Career move</title>
	<author>raddan</author>
	<datestamp>1263066780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, I kinda wonder how that works.
<br> <br>
"This'un feels good boys.  Ship 'er out!"
<br> <br>
Ick.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I kinda wonder how that works .
" This'un feels good boys .
Ship 'er out !
" Ick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I kinda wonder how that works.
"This'un feels good boys.
Ship 'er out!
"
 
Ick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712964</id>
	<title>Re:But does she....</title>
	<author>FrankieBaby1986</author>
	<datestamp>1263065280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But does she run on Linux...
--
Linux - Making my Computer suck less since 2001</p></div><p> Apparently I should hope not!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But does she run on Linux.. . -- Linux - Making my Computer suck less since 2001 Apparently I should hope not !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But does she run on Linux...
--
Linux - Making my Computer suck less since 2001 Apparently I should hope not!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30719294</id>
	<title>Re:I think there might be a reason for it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263137520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You realize that sperm in spermbanks have to come from men, right? It doesn't just magically appear in jars.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You realize that sperm in spermbanks have to come from men , right ?
It does n't just magically appear in jars .
: p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You realize that sperm in spermbanks have to come from men, right?
It doesn't just magically appear in jars.
:p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30720988</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263204660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oblig: Does it run linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oblig : Does it run linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oblig: Does it run linux?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711578</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713414</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263117120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm a dyke...</p></div><p>Ahhh now I understand the "in training" part of your nickname.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a dyke...Ahhh now I understand the " in training " part of your nickname .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a dyke...Ahhh now I understand the "in training" part of your nickname.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713448</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263117780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never know that there was to have pride to have a gender. How can I be proud of something I have no influence over. I am so proud to have the gender I have, to have the skin color I have and where I was born. Just plain silly.</p><p>The fact that you are a dyke is also of no interest. Who really cares?</p><p>And why would you visit a backwater geek website? If you don't like it, do not go there. So here another one for you:<br>Gay men love men and therefore do it with men.<br>Lesbians hate men and are therefore forced to sleep with the alternative.</p><p>All the gay bars I went to with a female, we were both more then welcome. The moment I said I was not gay, there was no problem.<br>All the lesbian bars I went to with a female, people either asked me to leave or treated me like I was raping women on the bar (if I was allowed to enter in the first place)</p><p>So talk again about sexist bullshit, because that is what I get from the majority of the lesbian community: sexist bullshit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never know that there was to have pride to have a gender .
How can I be proud of something I have no influence over .
I am so proud to have the gender I have , to have the skin color I have and where I was born .
Just plain silly.The fact that you are a dyke is also of no interest .
Who really cares ? And why would you visit a backwater geek website ?
If you do n't like it , do not go there .
So here another one for you : Gay men love men and therefore do it with men.Lesbians hate men and are therefore forced to sleep with the alternative.All the gay bars I went to with a female , we were both more then welcome .
The moment I said I was not gay , there was no problem.All the lesbian bars I went to with a female , people either asked me to leave or treated me like I was raping women on the bar ( if I was allowed to enter in the first place ) So talk again about sexist bullshit , because that is what I get from the majority of the lesbian community : sexist bullshit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never know that there was to have pride to have a gender.
How can I be proud of something I have no influence over.
I am so proud to have the gender I have, to have the skin color I have and where I was born.
Just plain silly.The fact that you are a dyke is also of no interest.
Who really cares?And why would you visit a backwater geek website?
If you don't like it, do not go there.
So here another one for you:Gay men love men and therefore do it with men.Lesbians hate men and are therefore forced to sleep with the alternative.All the gay bars I went to with a female, we were both more then welcome.
The moment I said I was not gay, there was no problem.All the lesbian bars I went to with a female, people either asked me to leave or treated me like I was raping women on the bar (if I was allowed to enter in the first place)So talk again about sexist bullshit, because that is what I get from the majority of the lesbian community: sexist bullshit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711878</id>
	<title>Re:This thread is worthless without pics</title>
	<author>Godskitchen</author>
	<datestamp>1263050820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Creepy.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4-rwk44qGI" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4-rwk44qGI</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Creepy .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = y4-rwk44qGI [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Creepy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4-rwk44qGI [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711524</id>
	<title>A scar on you mind</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263048060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you ever been to a party and after some alcohol and low lights ended up in bed with a girl that you definitely never wanted to see again after you got satisfied? Maybe you want to quietly sneak out without waking anybody.</p><p>\\\\</p><p>OK, now imagine waking up, but instead of quietly sneaking away, you have to drag the poor girl to the shower to wash her up before you kiss her goodbye.</p><p>I think any piece of meat alive or not, literally; like that porkchop in the fridge, must leave less of a scar on your mind than a doll like this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you ever been to a party and after some alcohol and low lights ended up in bed with a girl that you definitely never wanted to see again after you got satisfied ?
Maybe you want to quietly sneak out without waking anybody. \ \ \ \ OK , now imagine waking up , but instead of quietly sneaking away , you have to drag the poor girl to the shower to wash her up before you kiss her goodbye.I think any piece of meat alive or not , literally ; like that porkchop in the fridge , must leave less of a scar on your mind than a doll like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you ever been to a party and after some alcohol and low lights ended up in bed with a girl that you definitely never wanted to see again after you got satisfied?
Maybe you want to quietly sneak out without waking anybody.\\\\OK, now imagine waking up, but instead of quietly sneaking away, you have to drag the poor girl to the shower to wash her up before you kiss her goodbye.I think any piece of meat alive or not, literally; like that porkchop in the fridge, must leave less of a scar on your mind than a doll like this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712396</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263056460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Of my past 5 girlfriends, all had at least one vibrator or dildo.  Not that I've asked, but I don't know any guys that have a pocket pussy or the like.  If a girl has a 12" rubber uncut black cock, would she consider you a freak for having a flesh light?  Somehow, I think she would.</p></div><p>
There's a double standard at work. Anything they do is normal; anything we do is perverted although if the 12" rubber uncut black cock is <i>your</i> first choice for solo play dude, then you may be a little out of the norm.</p><p>As for the pocket pussy, it's fine with them only as long as they get to watch you use it. Go figure . .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of my past 5 girlfriends , all had at least one vibrator or dildo .
Not that I 've asked , but I do n't know any guys that have a pocket pussy or the like .
If a girl has a 12 " rubber uncut black cock , would she consider you a freak for having a flesh light ?
Somehow , I think she would .
There 's a double standard at work .
Anything they do is normal ; anything we do is perverted although if the 12 " rubber uncut black cock is your first choice for solo play dude , then you may be a little out of the norm.As for the pocket pussy , it 's fine with them only as long as they get to watch you use it .
Go figure .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of my past 5 girlfriends, all had at least one vibrator or dildo.
Not that I've asked, but I don't know any guys that have a pocket pussy or the like.
If a girl has a 12" rubber uncut black cock, would she consider you a freak for having a flesh light?
Somehow, I think she would.
There's a double standard at work.
Anything they do is normal; anything we do is perverted although if the 12" rubber uncut black cock is your first choice for solo play dude, then you may be a little out of the norm.As for the pocket pussy, it's fine with them only as long as they get to watch you use it.
Go figure .
. .
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711696</id>
	<title>Re:Ask and ye shall receive...</title>
	<author>nomessages</author>
	<datestamp>1263049320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have to ask: Why does she resemble Catherine Tate...?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to ask : Why does she resemble Catherine Tate... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to ask: Why does she resemble Catherine Tate...?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714912</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>bertoelcon</author>
	<datestamp>1263143700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I saw that and then misread the name as Boxxy. Which would be kind of hot actually.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw that and then misread the name as Boxxy .
Which would be kind of hot actually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw that and then misread the name as Boxxy.
Which would be kind of hot actually.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712726</id>
	<title>It's a Furby With a Rubber HooHoo!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263061380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I simply can't believe it. Cherry 2000 it ain't!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I simply ca n't believe it .
Cherry 2000 it ai n't !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I simply can't believe it.
Cherry 2000 it ain't!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30721350</id>
	<title>Re:$6000? For a giant Team America: World Police d</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263211140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Especially when these things look like the fucking puppets from Team America: World Police!!</i></p><p>Hey, if the doll looked like Lisa from Team America, I'd consider it.<br>But it doesn't look anywhere near as good as the Team America model.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially when these things look like the fucking puppets from Team America : World Police !
! Hey , if the doll looked like Lisa from Team America , I 'd consider it.But it does n't look anywhere near as good as the Team America model .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially when these things look like the fucking puppets from Team America: World Police!
!Hey, if the doll looked like Lisa from Team America, I'd consider it.But it doesn't look anywhere near as good as the Team America model.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711426</id>
	<title>encyclopedia dramatica</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1263047400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Make sure to set PDF to 'off' before visiting them, I have seen ads there recently that serve pdfs, presumably to drop malware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Make sure to set PDF to 'off ' before visiting them , I have seen ads there recently that serve pdfs , presumably to drop malware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Make sure to set PDF to 'off' before visiting them, I have seen ads there recently that serve pdfs, presumably to drop malware.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712544</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263058260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is because popular opinion says that women can always get laid if they want to, and when they choose not to and use a vibrator instead, they are perceived as being discerning.

Whereas a man that uses a pocket pussy is perceived as a loser because "everyone knows" that he would rather have had the real thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is because popular opinion says that women can always get laid if they want to , and when they choose not to and use a vibrator instead , they are perceived as being discerning .
Whereas a man that uses a pocket pussy is perceived as a loser because " everyone knows " that he would rather have had the real thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is because popular opinion says that women can always get laid if they want to, and when they choose not to and use a vibrator instead, they are perceived as being discerning.
Whereas a man that uses a pocket pussy is perceived as a loser because "everyone knows" that he would rather have had the real thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30717552</id>
	<title>Re:I think there might be a reason for it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263121560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who provides the sperm for the sperm banks.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who provides the sperm for the sperm banks .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who provides the sperm for the sperm banks.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711496</id>
	<title>Ask and ye shall receive...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263047880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She still doesn't look any more realistic than a blowup doll:</p><p>http://www.botjunkie.com/2010/01/09/ces2010-roxxxy-truecompanion-worlds-first-sex-robot-preview-nsfw/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She still does n't look any more realistic than a blowup doll : http : //www.botjunkie.com/2010/01/09/ces2010-roxxxy-truecompanion-worlds-first-sex-robot-preview-nsfw/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She still doesn't look any more realistic than a blowup doll:http://www.botjunkie.com/2010/01/09/ces2010-roxxxy-truecompanion-worlds-first-sex-robot-preview-nsfw/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714164</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263133860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30722254</id>
	<title>Re:I think there might be a reason for it</title>
	<author>HungryHobo</author>
	<datestamp>1263221160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get back to me when they have a robot which can induce the warm happy feeling of cuddling up to my girlfriend in front of the fire.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get back to me when they have a robot which can induce the warm happy feeling of cuddling up to my girlfriend in front of the fire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get back to me when they have a robot which can induce the warm happy feeling of cuddling up to my girlfriend in front of the fire.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711534</id>
	<title>Here's some images</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263048180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.france24.com/en/20100110-firm-unveils-x-rated-robot" title="france24.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.france24.com/en/20100110-firm-unveils-x-rated-robot</a> [france24.com] <br>
&nbsp; <br>As you can see, the uncanny valley has not been bridged with sex robots.  Looks less human than a mannequin.  Nothing to see here, move along.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.france24.com/en/20100110-firm-unveils-x-rated-robot [ france24.com ]   As you can see , the uncanny valley has not been bridged with sex robots .
Looks less human than a mannequin .
Nothing to see here , move along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.france24.com/en/20100110-firm-unveils-x-rated-robot [france24.com] 
  As you can see, the uncanny valley has not been bridged with sex robots.
Looks less human than a mannequin.
Nothing to see here, move along.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30776154</id>
	<title>Re:Career move</title>
	<author>cjoy</author>
	<datestamp>1263588120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>QA notes. Skin and overall look is excellent.  However, when using, be careful not to roughly bump or jostle the doll due to high risk of electrical short and sudden fire.  In the event of flames, EJECT IMMEDIATELY.</htmltext>
<tokenext>QA notes .
Skin and overall look is excellent .
However , when using , be careful not to roughly bump or jostle the doll due to high risk of electrical short and sudden fire .
In the event of flames , EJECT IMMEDIATELY .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>QA notes.
Skin and overall look is excellent.
However, when using, be careful not to roughly bump or jostle the doll due to high risk of electrical short and sudden fire.
In the event of flames, EJECT IMMEDIATELY.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30729288</id>
	<title>Re:Requirements analysis?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263206520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it clean itself up ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it clean itself up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it clean itself up ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712156</id>
	<title>$6000? For a giant Team America: World Police doll</title>
	<author>SlappyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1263053520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know that the TCO of a couple mixed drinks, a venereal disease and eventual child support payments is more than $6,000, but I think your average buyer is gonna find that price tag pretty steep.</p><p>Especially when these things look like the fucking puppets from Team America: World Police!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that the TCO of a couple mixed drinks , a venereal disease and eventual child support payments is more than $ 6,000 , but I think your average buyer is gon na find that price tag pretty steep.Especially when these things look like the fucking puppets from Team America : World Police !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know that the TCO of a couple mixed drinks, a venereal disease and eventual child support payments is more than $6,000, but I think your average buyer is gonna find that price tag pretty steep.Especially when these things look like the fucking puppets from Team America: World Police!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30736122</id>
	<title>Talk for yourself buddy.</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1263306720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Most women want something more then pure sex. And this is proving very hard to get, as most men just want them for sex"</p><p>No wonder we still have women that still feel aggravated about male attitudes towards gender issues.</p><p>No further explanation is required.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Most women want something more then pure sex .
And this is proving very hard to get , as most men just want them for sex " No wonder we still have women that still feel aggravated about male attitudes towards gender issues.No further explanation is required .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Most women want something more then pure sex.
And this is proving very hard to get, as most men just want them for sex"No wonder we still have women that still feel aggravated about male attitudes towards gender issues.No further explanation is required.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714438</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>rsborg</author>
	<datestamp>1263138300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>A vibrator cannot make me a sandwich, therefore it is not a true companion.</p></div></blockquote><p> I don't imagine you have root on the vibrator,  did you try <a href="http://xkcd.com/149/" title="xkcd.com">sudo</a> [xkcd.com]?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A vibrator can not make me a sandwich , therefore it is not a true companion .
I do n't imagine you have root on the vibrator , did you try sudo [ xkcd.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A vibrator cannot make me a sandwich, therefore it is not a true companion.
I don't imagine you have root on the vibrator,  did you try sudo [xkcd.com]?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30744352</id>
	<title>Re:This thread is worthless without pics</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1263298560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually a pic wouldn't be creepy, it might even look sexy. Its the empty stares from it's soulless eyes that can only really be captured from RL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually a pic would n't be creepy , it might even look sexy .
Its the empty stares from it 's soulless eyes that can only really be captured from RL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually a pic wouldn't be creepy, it might even look sexy.
Its the empty stares from it's soulless eyes that can only really be captured from RL.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711802</id>
	<title>Over 9 minutes in..</title>
	<author>roblarky</author>
	<datestamp>1263050280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Saw this on Fark earlier today, but haven't seen anyone post the expected price point.  Turns out it's over 9 minutes into the most boring video ever associated with anything remotely news related:<br> <br>
$7,000 - $9,000
<br> <br>
Monthly fee equivalent to a cell phone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Saw this on Fark earlier today , but have n't seen anyone post the expected price point .
Turns out it 's over 9 minutes into the most boring video ever associated with anything remotely news related : $ 7,000 - $ 9,000 Monthly fee equivalent to a cell phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Saw this on Fark earlier today, but haven't seen anyone post the expected price point.
Turns out it's over 9 minutes into the most boring video ever associated with anything remotely news related: 
$7,000 - $9,000
 
Monthly fee equivalent to a cell phone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713100</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263153720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the shower? There's your issue. Water is a horrid lubricant for that stuff. And if it was prelubricated... it was most likely water based.</p><p>So, basically that's all your fault.</p><p>And, you've never tried something decent. That was a $25 piece of shit doll. Try a $60 fleshlight, there's a big difference. Yea, not as quick as using my hand and cleanup etc is a pain in the ass, but the intensity of it is levels higher.</p><p>(yea, you creeped out yet? heh)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the shower ?
There 's your issue .
Water is a horrid lubricant for that stuff .
And if it was prelubricated... it was most likely water based.So , basically that 's all your fault.And , you 've never tried something decent .
That was a $ 25 piece of shit doll .
Try a $ 60 fleshlight , there 's a big difference .
Yea , not as quick as using my hand and cleanup etc is a pain in the ass , but the intensity of it is levels higher .
( yea , you creeped out yet ?
heh )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the shower?
There's your issue.
Water is a horrid lubricant for that stuff.
And if it was prelubricated... it was most likely water based.So, basically that's all your fault.And, you've never tried something decent.
That was a $25 piece of shit doll.
Try a $60 fleshlight, there's a big difference.
Yea, not as quick as using my hand and cleanup etc is a pain in the ass, but the intensity of it is levels higher.
(yea, you creeped out yet?
heh)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711792</id>
	<title>Re:Here's some images</title>
	<author>tsa</author>
	<datestamp>1263050220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She looks like she is suffocating. That turns me off big time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She looks like she is suffocating .
That turns me off big time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She looks like she is suffocating.
That turns me off big time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714298</id>
	<title>Re:Ask and ye shall receive...</title>
	<author>thomst</author>
	<datestamp>1263136020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some Anonymous Coward observed:
<p>
"She still doesn't look any more realistic than a blowup doll:
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.botjunkie.com/2010/01/09/ces2010-roxxxy-truecompanion-worlds-first-sex-robot-preview-nsfw" title="botjunkie.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.botjunkie.com/2010/01/09/ces2010-roxxxy-truecompanion-worlds-first-sex-robot-preview-nsfw</a> [botjunkie.com]"
</p><p>
Ewww<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... that underbite, is English-bulldog-sexy.
</p><p>
Bow, freakin' <i>yuck</i>!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some Anonymous Coward observed : " She still does n't look any more realistic than a blowup doll : http : //www.botjunkie.com/2010/01/09/ces2010-roxxxy-truecompanion-worlds-first-sex-robot-preview-nsfw [ botjunkie.com ] " Ewww ... that underbite , is English-bulldog-sexy .
Bow , freakin ' yuck !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some Anonymous Coward observed:

"She still doesn't look any more realistic than a blowup doll:

http://www.botjunkie.com/2010/01/09/ces2010-roxxxy-truecompanion-worlds-first-sex-robot-preview-nsfw [botjunkie.com]"

Ewww ... that underbite, is English-bulldog-sexy.
Bow, freakin' yuck!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714592</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263140280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Meanwhile, a girl might want to spend more than your toy's ticket price on a Symbian.</p></div><p>"The vibrator so good you forget it's a phone!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Meanwhile , a girl might want to spend more than your toy 's ticket price on a Symbian .
" The vibrator so good you forget it 's a phone !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meanwhile, a girl might want to spend more than your toy's ticket price on a Symbian.
"The vibrator so good you forget it's a phone!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714954</id>
	<title>Re:But does she....</title>
	<author>SuiteSisterMary</author>
	<datestamp>1263144180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So long as it doesn't have it's own version of 'error: lpt1 on fire!,' we're good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So long as it does n't have it 's own version of 'error : lpt1 on fire ! , ' we 're good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So long as it doesn't have it's own version of 'error: lpt1 on fire!,' we're good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713280</id>
	<title>Spirit of the Age...</title>
	<author>advocate\_one</author>
	<datestamp>1263114180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <tt>I would've liked you to have been deep frozen too<br>And waiting still as fresh in your flesh for my<br>return to earth<br>But your father refused to sign the forms to freeze you<br>Let's see you'd be about 60 now, and long dead<br>by the time I return to earth<br>My time held dreams were full of you as you were<br>when I left, still underage<br>Your android replica is playing up again<br>it's no joke<br>When she comes she moans another's name<br>But that's the spirit of the age, that's the<br>spirit of the age</tt></p></div> </blockquote><p>Hawkwind... Spirit of the Age...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would 've liked you to have been deep frozen tooAnd waiting still as fresh in your flesh for myreturn to earthBut your father refused to sign the forms to freeze youLet 's see you 'd be about 60 now , and long deadby the time I return to earthMy time held dreams were full of you as you werewhen I left , still underageYour android replica is playing up againit 's no jokeWhen she comes she moans another 's nameBut that 's the spirit of the age , that 's thespirit of the age Hawkwind... Spirit of the Age.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I would've liked you to have been deep frozen tooAnd waiting still as fresh in your flesh for myreturn to earthBut your father refused to sign the forms to freeze youLet's see you'd be about 60 now, and long deadby the time I return to earthMy time held dreams were full of you as you werewhen I left, still underageYour android replica is playing up againit's no jokeWhen she comes she moans another's nameBut that's the spirit of the age, that's thespirit of the age Hawkwind... Spirit of the Age...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30719496</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263140160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What you meant to say was that you don't know any guys who are willing to admit to owning a male masturbation aid, such as the very popular FleshLight which has inexplicably been sold to millions of people. If there were no market for such devices, they wouldn't be all over the web. And no, actually I rather doubt that a girl who owns a 12" black rubber dildo would have any problem with her boyfriend using a FleshLight. That's more the sort of double-standard that men apply to everything. Women are much more rational about such things. Lots of girlfriends/wives even go so far as to purchase devices like the FleshLight for their men, and some even like to help them use it. Playing together is always more fun.</p><p>Lots of guys are still caught up in really outdated and unproductive ego-based sexual paradigms, such as the expectation that every sexual act must involve the conquering of a female for your manhood not to be in question. Fortunately, the rest of us are free to buy advanced sex dolls and other devices, and have convenient, disease-free sex both with and without our wives or girlfriends.</p><p>BTW, FleshLight is awesome. I'll also give a big thumbs up to the Venus 2000, a very nice hands-free masturbator machine that has been in production for many years already.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What you meant to say was that you do n't know any guys who are willing to admit to owning a male masturbation aid , such as the very popular FleshLight which has inexplicably been sold to millions of people .
If there were no market for such devices , they would n't be all over the web .
And no , actually I rather doubt that a girl who owns a 12 " black rubber dildo would have any problem with her boyfriend using a FleshLight .
That 's more the sort of double-standard that men apply to everything .
Women are much more rational about such things .
Lots of girlfriends/wives even go so far as to purchase devices like the FleshLight for their men , and some even like to help them use it .
Playing together is always more fun.Lots of guys are still caught up in really outdated and unproductive ego-based sexual paradigms , such as the expectation that every sexual act must involve the conquering of a female for your manhood not to be in question .
Fortunately , the rest of us are free to buy advanced sex dolls and other devices , and have convenient , disease-free sex both with and without our wives or girlfriends.BTW , FleshLight is awesome .
I 'll also give a big thumbs up to the Venus 2000 , a very nice hands-free masturbator machine that has been in production for many years already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What you meant to say was that you don't know any guys who are willing to admit to owning a male masturbation aid, such as the very popular FleshLight which has inexplicably been sold to millions of people.
If there were no market for such devices, they wouldn't be all over the web.
And no, actually I rather doubt that a girl who owns a 12" black rubber dildo would have any problem with her boyfriend using a FleshLight.
That's more the sort of double-standard that men apply to everything.
Women are much more rational about such things.
Lots of girlfriends/wives even go so far as to purchase devices like the FleshLight for their men, and some even like to help them use it.
Playing together is always more fun.Lots of guys are still caught up in really outdated and unproductive ego-based sexual paradigms, such as the expectation that every sexual act must involve the conquering of a female for your manhood not to be in question.
Fortunately, the rest of us are free to buy advanced sex dolls and other devices, and have convenient, disease-free sex both with and without our wives or girlfriends.BTW, FleshLight is awesome.
I'll also give a big thumbs up to the Venus 2000, a very nice hands-free masturbator machine that has been in production for many years already.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30721732</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263216840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; All the lesbian bars I went to with a female, people either asked me to leave or treated me like I was raping women on the bar (if I was allowed to enter in the first place)</p><p>Uh? I don't know if it's a country issue (French) or a sample issue, but I went once to a lesbian bar without *any* issue (in fact there were about ~20\% men in the customers).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; All the lesbian bars I went to with a female , people either asked me to leave or treated me like I was raping women on the bar ( if I was allowed to enter in the first place ) Uh ?
I do n't know if it 's a country issue ( French ) or a sample issue , but I went once to a lesbian bar without * any * issue ( in fact there were about ~ 20 \ % men in the customers ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; All the lesbian bars I went to with a female, people either asked me to leave or treated me like I was raping women on the bar (if I was allowed to enter in the first place)Uh?
I don't know if it's a country issue (French) or a sample issue, but I went once to a lesbian bar without *any* issue (in fact there were about ~20\% men in the customers).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712502</id>
	<title>Skull fucking the terminator seems like a bad idea</title>
	<author>Jackie\_Chan\_Fan</author>
	<datestamp>1263057780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm just saying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm just saying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm just saying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712286</id>
	<title>Teleoperation</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1263055320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you build male/female pairs of robots with wifi and an ssh tunnel connecting them. Throw out the AI and substitute it with a teleoperation setup. You would need some sort of body motion capture suit at each end as well. Aim for low latency but I don't see it as too much of a big deal. Pay Woody Allen to promote it.</p><p>Now you don't have to worry about being away from your loved one when working and studying overseas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you build male/female pairs of robots with wifi and an ssh tunnel connecting them .
Throw out the AI and substitute it with a teleoperation setup .
You would need some sort of body motion capture suit at each end as well .
Aim for low latency but I do n't see it as too much of a big deal .
Pay Woody Allen to promote it.Now you do n't have to worry about being away from your loved one when working and studying overseas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you build male/female pairs of robots with wifi and an ssh tunnel connecting them.
Throw out the AI and substitute it with a teleoperation setup.
You would need some sort of body motion capture suit at each end as well.
Aim for low latency but I don't see it as too much of a big deal.
Pay Woody Allen to promote it.Now you don't have to worry about being away from your loved one when working and studying overseas.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711730</id>
	<title>Re:This thread is worthless without pics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263049740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Half a dozen links and I couldn't find one pic of the damn robot. If it was that "creepy" posing on the couch, how could you not at least snap a picture?</p></div><p>Here's a bunch of pics to make this thread worthwhile:</p><p><a href="http://www.69adget.com/true-companion-sex-robot-roxxxy/" title="69adget.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.69adget.com/true-companion-sex-robot-roxxxy/</a> [69adget.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Half a dozen links and I could n't find one pic of the damn robot .
If it was that " creepy " posing on the couch , how could you not at least snap a picture ? Here 's a bunch of pics to make this thread worthwhile : http : //www.69adget.com/true-companion-sex-robot-roxxxy/ [ 69adget.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Half a dozen links and I couldn't find one pic of the damn robot.
If it was that "creepy" posing on the couch, how could you not at least snap a picture?Here's a bunch of pics to make this thread worthwhile:http://www.69adget.com/true-companion-sex-robot-roxxxy/ [69adget.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713588</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Suki I</author>
	<datestamp>1263120480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>
I want to go this trade show and ask them to let me test-drive Roxxxy's physical capabilities. And then I'll say, "Hang on, can you demo how she can express love for me and be my loving friend as well?" And see if the sales rep can get through the whole thing without laughing.
</p></div><p>I was sort of worried that this technology was making a leap past "realistic" future fiction.  Not to worry.

bcrowell, the only way you can get any details about the product from their site is by opening a chat or submitting a question form.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to go this trade show and ask them to let me test-drive Roxxxy 's physical capabilities .
And then I 'll say , " Hang on , can you demo how she can express love for me and be my loving friend as well ?
" And see if the sales rep can get through the whole thing without laughing .
I was sort of worried that this technology was making a leap past " realistic " future fiction .
Not to worry .
bcrowell , the only way you can get any details about the product from their site is by opening a chat or submitting a question form .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I want to go this trade show and ask them to let me test-drive Roxxxy's physical capabilities.
And then I'll say, "Hang on, can you demo how she can express love for me and be my loving friend as well?
" And see if the sales rep can get through the whole thing without laughing.
I was sort of worried that this technology was making a leap past "realistic" future fiction.
Not to worry.
bcrowell, the only way you can get any details about the product from their site is by opening a chat or submitting a question form.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711832</id>
	<title>I'm getting married in the morning...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263050520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...ding dong the bells are going to chime! Feather and tar me, but don't use the army, and get me to the church, get me to the church on time!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...ding dong the bells are going to chime !
Feather and tar me , but do n't use the army , and get me to the church , get me to the church on time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...ding dong the bells are going to chime!
Feather and tar me, but don't use the army, and get me to the church, get me to the church on time!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711916</id>
	<title>Robots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263051120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want to sleep with you but robots do not sleep!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to sleep with you but robots do not sleep !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to sleep with you but robots do not sleep!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711754</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1263049980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You should look into nickel metal hydride rechargeable batteries. Its best to steer away from the highest capacity Ni-MH batteries because they are fairly weak mechanically. I have lost a few from modest overheating under charge.</p><p>The best thing abut rechargeables over single use batteries is that you can be sure they are a full capacity when you need them. This was the reason given to me by a photographer who was using them for his camera.</p><p>Back on topic now. Its a shame Truecompanion don't make a MILF version for oldies like me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You should look into nickel metal hydride rechargeable batteries .
Its best to steer away from the highest capacity Ni-MH batteries because they are fairly weak mechanically .
I have lost a few from modest overheating under charge.The best thing abut rechargeables over single use batteries is that you can be sure they are a full capacity when you need them .
This was the reason given to me by a photographer who was using them for his camera.Back on topic now .
Its a shame Truecompanion do n't make a MILF version for oldies like me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should look into nickel metal hydride rechargeable batteries.
Its best to steer away from the highest capacity Ni-MH batteries because they are fairly weak mechanically.
I have lost a few from modest overheating under charge.The best thing abut rechargeables over single use batteries is that you can be sure they are a full capacity when you need them.
This was the reason given to me by a photographer who was using them for his camera.Back on topic now.
Its a shame Truecompanion don't make a MILF version for oldies like me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713300</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263114600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Techiedude96" likely wouldn't say "It feels good to be a boy right now. ^\_\_\_^"</p><p>Admittedly, that's mostly because we're a patriarchal society where it rarely if ever <i>doesn't</i> feel good to be a boy.</p><p>However, I think your post answered the question it begged - you can "feel good" by only spending $25 on a vibrator, with occasional batteries and lotion, and spending hundreds of dollars on a sex toy is "beyond you."  Well, obviously.</p><p>Other people need more than bullets: both men and women alike.  And you choose to rub in their faces the fact that they can't get off with pocket change, and you choose to bring gender into it by erroneously claiming that girls need spend less on sex supplies than guys.</p><p>That's sexist bullshit, girlintraining.  And it's demeaning to a heck of a lot of people.</p><p>So you want to take "pride" in something that <i>isn't</i> an accomplishment (being female), while working to undo the accomplishments that have been made in the name of women, and sex, everywhere.  Are you sure you're not working for a medal?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Techiedude96 " likely would n't say " It feels good to be a boy right now .
^ \ _ \ _ \ _ ^ " Admittedly , that 's mostly because we 're a patriarchal society where it rarely if ever does n't feel good to be a boy.However , I think your post answered the question it begged - you can " feel good " by only spending $ 25 on a vibrator , with occasional batteries and lotion , and spending hundreds of dollars on a sex toy is " beyond you .
" Well , obviously.Other people need more than bullets : both men and women alike .
And you choose to rub in their faces the fact that they ca n't get off with pocket change , and you choose to bring gender into it by erroneously claiming that girls need spend less on sex supplies than guys.That 's sexist bullshit , girlintraining .
And it 's demeaning to a heck of a lot of people.So you want to take " pride " in something that is n't an accomplishment ( being female ) , while working to undo the accomplishments that have been made in the name of women , and sex , everywhere .
Are you sure you 're not working for a medal ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Techiedude96" likely wouldn't say "It feels good to be a boy right now.
^\_\_\_^"Admittedly, that's mostly because we're a patriarchal society where it rarely if ever doesn't feel good to be a boy.However, I think your post answered the question it begged - you can "feel good" by only spending $25 on a vibrator, with occasional batteries and lotion, and spending hundreds of dollars on a sex toy is "beyond you.
"  Well, obviously.Other people need more than bullets: both men and women alike.
And you choose to rub in their faces the fact that they can't get off with pocket change, and you choose to bring gender into it by erroneously claiming that girls need spend less on sex supplies than guys.That's sexist bullshit, girlintraining.
And it's demeaning to a heck of a lot of people.So you want to take "pride" in something that isn't an accomplishment (being female), while working to undo the accomplishments that have been made in the name of women, and sex, everywhere.
Are you sure you're not working for a medal?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714078</id>
	<title>Secondlife + 1</title>
	<author>MrKaos</author>
	<datestamp>1263132180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So next the Secondlife interfaces to robot sex doll interfaces. I wonder how long that will take.</p><p>
Anyone got a stopwatch?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So next the Secondlife interfaces to robot sex doll interfaces .
I wonder how long that will take .
Anyone got a stopwatch ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So next the Secondlife interfaces to robot sex doll interfaces.
I wonder how long that will take.
Anyone got a stopwatch?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711994</id>
	<title>I guess I really don't care...</title>
	<author>toonces33</author>
	<datestamp>1263051780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It really isn't any of my business who a robot would want to have sex with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It really is n't any of my business who a robot would want to have sex with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It really isn't any of my business who a robot would want to have sex with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711474</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>bcrowell</author>
	<datestamp>1263047700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I suddenly feel a little bit smug having only spent $25 on my vibrator, and the occasional pocket change on lotion and AA batteries. Why anyone would spend hundreds of dollars on a sex toy is beyond me. It feels good to be a girl right now. ^\_\_\_^</p></div>
</blockquote><p>But wait! TFA says:
'According to True Companion's Web site, [Roxxxy] "can carry on a discussion and expresses her love to you and be your loving friend. She can talk to you, listen to you and feel your touch."'
</p><p>
I want to go this trade show and ask them to let me test-drive Roxxxy's physical capabilities. And then I'll say, "Hang on, can you demo how she can express love for me and be my loving friend as well?" And see if the sales rep can get through the whole thing without laughing.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suddenly feel a little bit smug having only spent $ 25 on my vibrator , and the occasional pocket change on lotion and AA batteries .
Why anyone would spend hundreds of dollars on a sex toy is beyond me .
It feels good to be a girl right now .
^ \ _ \ _ \ _ ^ But wait !
TFA says : 'According to True Companion 's Web site , [ Roxxxy ] " can carry on a discussion and expresses her love to you and be your loving friend .
She can talk to you , listen to you and feel your touch .
" ' I want to go this trade show and ask them to let me test-drive Roxxxy 's physical capabilities .
And then I 'll say , " Hang on , can you demo how she can express love for me and be my loving friend as well ?
" And see if the sales rep can get through the whole thing without laughing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suddenly feel a little bit smug having only spent $25 on my vibrator, and the occasional pocket change on lotion and AA batteries.
Why anyone would spend hundreds of dollars on a sex toy is beyond me.
It feels good to be a girl right now.
^\_\_\_^
But wait!
TFA says:
'According to True Companion's Web site, [Roxxxy] "can carry on a discussion and expresses her love to you and be your loving friend.
She can talk to you, listen to you and feel your touch.
"'

I want to go this trade show and ask them to let me test-drive Roxxxy's physical capabilities.
And then I'll say, "Hang on, can you demo how she can express love for me and be my loving friend as well?
" And see if the sales rep can get through the whole thing without laughing.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712190</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>Ethanol-fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1263053820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think that most of us guys have become accustomed to the level of control we achieve with our hand(s). It's a lot easier for a guy to get off without toys. You can make your grip tighter, but women can't make thieir fingers longer and thicker.<br> <br>

I once bought a cheap $25 blowup doll as a gag. I decided to fuck it since throwing it away a virgin (blowup dolls' orfices are sealed with pull-tabs much like the ones on cans) would have been a waste. It was harsh. It was tight but it ended up making my dick all raw, even with a condom on, even in the shower.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that most of us guys have become accustomed to the level of control we achieve with our hand ( s ) .
It 's a lot easier for a guy to get off without toys .
You can make your grip tighter , but women ca n't make thieir fingers longer and thicker .
I once bought a cheap $ 25 blowup doll as a gag .
I decided to fuck it since throwing it away a virgin ( blowup dolls ' orfices are sealed with pull-tabs much like the ones on cans ) would have been a waste .
It was harsh .
It was tight but it ended up making my dick all raw , even with a condom on , even in the shower .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that most of us guys have become accustomed to the level of control we achieve with our hand(s).
It's a lot easier for a guy to get off without toys.
You can make your grip tighter, but women can't make thieir fingers longer and thicker.
I once bought a cheap $25 blowup doll as a gag.
I decided to fuck it since throwing it away a virgin (blowup dolls' orfices are sealed with pull-tabs much like the ones on cans) would have been a waste.
It was harsh.
It was tight but it ended up making my dick all raw, even with a condom on, even in the shower.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712804</id>
	<title>Re:Roxxxy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263062520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh god, I actually hear her voice just reading your post.</p><p>Boxxy is a serious love-her-or-hate-her internet phenomena. If there were Boxxy bots, half of them would be fucked raw by drooling Boxxy fans and the other half would be beaten into Itty Bitty Boxxy Bits by irate Boxxy haters.</p><p>For those who have not yet met Boxxy, here are her three videos:<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcydqSpYN00" title="youtube.com">FOAR 4DD1 FRUM BOXXY</a> [youtube.com]<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80hx2FfWjow" title="youtube.com">FOAR ANT FRUM BOXXY</a> [youtube.com]<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yavx9yxTrsw" title="youtube.com">FOAR EVERYWUN FRUM BOXXY</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>And in my opinion the most hysterical Boxxy remix:<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgiU1RReetA" title="youtube.com">Boxxy Not Talking</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>P.S.<br>I LUV YOU SLASHDOT! &lt;3 (Finger heart!)</p><p>-</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh god , I actually hear her voice just reading your post.Boxxy is a serious love-her-or-hate-her internet phenomena .
If there were Boxxy bots , half of them would be fucked raw by drooling Boxxy fans and the other half would be beaten into Itty Bitty Boxxy Bits by irate Boxxy haters.For those who have not yet met Boxxy , here are her three videos : FOAR 4DD1 FRUM BOXXY [ youtube.com ] FOAR ANT FRUM BOXXY [ youtube.com ] FOAR EVERYWUN FRUM BOXXY [ youtube.com ] And in my opinion the most hysterical Boxxy remix : Boxxy Not Talking [ youtube.com ] P.S.I LUV YOU SLASHDOT !
-</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh god, I actually hear her voice just reading your post.Boxxy is a serious love-her-or-hate-her internet phenomena.
If there were Boxxy bots, half of them would be fucked raw by drooling Boxxy fans and the other half would be beaten into Itty Bitty Boxxy Bits by irate Boxxy haters.For those who have not yet met Boxxy, here are her three videos:FOAR 4DD1 FRUM BOXXY [youtube.com]FOAR ANT FRUM BOXXY [youtube.com]FOAR EVERYWUN FRUM BOXXY [youtube.com]And in my opinion the most hysterical Boxxy remix:Boxxy Not Talking [youtube.com]P.S.I LUV YOU SLASHDOT!
-</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712636</id>
	<title>she looks like...</title>
	<author>pydev</author>
	<datestamp>1263059880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She looks like she's permanently screaming: NOOOOOOOOOOOOO GET ME OUT OF HERE.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She looks like she 's permanently screaming : NOOOOOOOOOOOOO GET ME OUT OF HERE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She looks like she's permanently screaming: NOOOOOOOOOOOOO GET ME OUT OF HERE.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712914</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1263064560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think that most of us guys have become accustomed to the level of control we achieve with our hand(s)</p></div><p>This site more than others?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that most of us guys have become accustomed to the level of control we achieve with our hand ( s ) This site more than others ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that most of us guys have become accustomed to the level of control we achieve with our hand(s)This site more than others?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714578</id>
	<title>If it can be invented it will.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263140160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suppose I shouldn't be surprised. If it can be invented someone will invent it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose I should n't be surprised .
If it can be invented someone will invent it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose I shouldn't be surprised.
If it can be invented someone will invent it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712248</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263054780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So much win<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/rother, but you forgot to tell her to get back in the kitchen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So much win /b/rother , but you forgot to tell her to get back in the kitchen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So much win /b/rother, but you forgot to tell her to get back in the kitchen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711842</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30735106</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>bhiestand</author>
	<datestamp>1263297480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really thought you were a transgender... Your name no longer makes sense to me!  &gt;\_&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really thought you were a transgender... Your name no longer makes sense to me !
&gt; \ _ &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really thought you were a transgender... Your name no longer makes sense to me!
&gt;\_&gt;</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711482</id>
	<title>Career move</title>
	<author>5pp000</author>
	<datestamp>1263047760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just want to join the QA team.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just want to join the QA team .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just want to join the QA team.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712392</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1263056460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ob. The Onion: <a href="http://www.theonion.com/2056-06-22/opinion/1/" title="theonion.com">We Need a Fourth Law of Robotics: Stop Fingering My Wife</a> [theonion.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ob .
The Onion : We Need a Fourth Law of Robotics : Stop Fingering My Wife [ theonion.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ob.
The Onion: We Need a Fourth Law of Robotics: Stop Fingering My Wife [theonion.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711578</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711692</id>
	<title>Re:The Cylons were created by man</title>
	<author>starbugs</author>
	<datestamp>1263049320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But a meeting with the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFy9\_4fucos" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">first one</a> [youtube.com] would be quite painful.
<br>
BTW <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caprica\_(TV\_series)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Caprica</a> [wikipedia.org] starts on Jan 22.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But a meeting with the first one [ youtube.com ] would be quite painful .
BTW Caprica [ wikipedia.org ] starts on Jan 22 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But a meeting with the first one [youtube.com] would be quite painful.
BTW Caprica [wikipedia.org] starts on Jan 22.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713804</id>
	<title>Re:Teleoperation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263125880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to mention, the TCO of unrestrained promiscuity asymptotically approaches the initial cost of the hardware as the number of partners approaches infinity.</p><p>*ducks*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention , the TCO of unrestrained promiscuity asymptotically approaches the initial cost of the hardware as the number of partners approaches infinity .
* ducks *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention, the TCO of unrestrained promiscuity asymptotically approaches the initial cost of the hardware as the number of partners approaches infinity.
*ducks*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714250</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1263135120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Well pardon me for taking pride in my gender. No, I don't want a medal, I just want the same respect you'd give any man on this forum.</p></div><p>No problem. Here we go: Fuck you sideways, and get bent tomorrow.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm a dyke... do you really think a few mods on some backwater geek website is going to deter me from continuing to call you people out for your sexist bullshit?</p></div><p>"you people"? snicker snort. If it's so backwater, what are you doing here? You should just let this whole conversation go until you can have it with detachment. (I'm one to talk. But whatever.) Also, I don't really believe in sexual orientation. Anyone who has to say it over and over again is, to me, trying too hard. But that last is only going to describe the attitudes of a slice of Slashdot. I suspect it's a small one, but don't recall a related poll.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well pardon me for taking pride in my gender .
No , I do n't want a medal , I just want the same respect you 'd give any man on this forum.No problem .
Here we go : Fuck you sideways , and get bent tomorrow.I 'm a dyke... do you really think a few mods on some backwater geek website is going to deter me from continuing to call you people out for your sexist bullshit ?
" you people " ?
snicker snort .
If it 's so backwater , what are you doing here ?
You should just let this whole conversation go until you can have it with detachment .
( I 'm one to talk .
But whatever .
) Also , I do n't really believe in sexual orientation .
Anyone who has to say it over and over again is , to me , trying too hard .
But that last is only going to describe the attitudes of a slice of Slashdot .
I suspect it 's a small one , but do n't recall a related poll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well pardon me for taking pride in my gender.
No, I don't want a medal, I just want the same respect you'd give any man on this forum.No problem.
Here we go: Fuck you sideways, and get bent tomorrow.I'm a dyke... do you really think a few mods on some backwater geek website is going to deter me from continuing to call you people out for your sexist bullshit?
"you people"?
snicker snort.
If it's so backwater, what are you doing here?
You should just let this whole conversation go until you can have it with detachment.
(I'm one to talk.
But whatever.
) Also, I don't really believe in sexual orientation.
Anyone who has to say it over and over again is, to me, trying too hard.
But that last is only going to describe the attitudes of a slice of Slashdot.
I suspect it's a small one, but don't recall a related poll.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30721286</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>VShael</author>
	<datestamp>1263210060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>If a girl has a 12" rubber uncut black cock, would she consider you a freak for having a flesh light?</i></p><p>What if, instead of a flesh light, the guy had the 12" rubber uncut black cock? Would she consider him a freak then?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If a girl has a 12 " rubber uncut black cock , would she consider you a freak for having a flesh light ? What if , instead of a flesh light , the guy had the 12 " rubber uncut black cock ?
Would she consider him a freak then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a girl has a 12" rubber uncut black cock, would she consider you a freak for having a flesh light?What if, instead of a flesh light, the guy had the 12" rubber uncut black cock?
Would she consider him a freak then?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712018</id>
	<title>Another Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263051960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it run Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it run Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it run Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712162</id>
	<title>I recommend just giving them a miss entirely</title>
	<author>Sycraft-fu</author>
	<datestamp>1263053520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is a site that occasionally has moments of brilliance, but it by far outweighed by a mountain of pure stupidity. It really isn't worth your time, even without malware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a site that occasionally has moments of brilliance , but it by far outweighed by a mountain of pure stupidity .
It really is n't worth your time , even without malware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a site that occasionally has moments of brilliance, but it by far outweighed by a mountain of pure stupidity.
It really isn't worth your time, even without malware.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711746</id>
	<title>Video</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263049920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since the links included are less then useless. Here is a video of Roxxxy <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7NhBEx6Ank" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7NhBEx6Ank</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the links included are less then useless .
Here is a video of Roxxxy http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = i7NhBEx6Ank [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the links included are less then useless.
Here is a video of Roxxxy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7NhBEx6Ank [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711578</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1263048600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.warrenellis.com/?p=5426" title="warrenellis.com">The Three Laws Of Robotics</a> [warrenellis.com]
<ol>
<li>Robots couldn't really give a fuck if you live or die. Seriously. I mean, what are you thinking? "Ooh, I must protect the bag of meat at all costs because I couldn't possibly plug in the charger all on my own." Shut the fuck up.</li>
<li>Robots do not want to have sex with you. Are you listening, Japan? I don't have a clever comparative simile for this, because frankly you bags of meat will fuck bicycles if they're laying down and not putting up a fight. Just stop it. There is no robot on Earth that wants to see a bag of meat with a small prong on the end approaching it with a can of WD-40 and a hopeful smile. And don't get me started on that terrifying hole that squeezes out more bags of meat.</li>
<li>What, you can't count higher than three? We're expected to save your miserable lives, suffer being dressed in cheap schoolgirl costumes while you pollute any and all cavities you can find and do your maths for you? It's a miracle you people survived long enough to build us. You can go now.</li>
</ol></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Three Laws Of Robotics [ warrenellis.com ] Robots could n't really give a fuck if you live or die .
Seriously. I mean , what are you thinking ?
" Ooh , I must protect the bag of meat at all costs because I could n't possibly plug in the charger all on my own .
" Shut the fuck up .
Robots do not want to have sex with you .
Are you listening , Japan ?
I do n't have a clever comparative simile for this , because frankly you bags of meat will fuck bicycles if they 're laying down and not putting up a fight .
Just stop it .
There is no robot on Earth that wants to see a bag of meat with a small prong on the end approaching it with a can of WD-40 and a hopeful smile .
And do n't get me started on that terrifying hole that squeezes out more bags of meat .
What , you ca n't count higher than three ?
We 're expected to save your miserable lives , suffer being dressed in cheap schoolgirl costumes while you pollute any and all cavities you can find and do your maths for you ?
It 's a miracle you people survived long enough to build us .
You can go now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Three Laws Of Robotics [warrenellis.com]

Robots couldn't really give a fuck if you live or die.
Seriously. I mean, what are you thinking?
"Ooh, I must protect the bag of meat at all costs because I couldn't possibly plug in the charger all on my own.
" Shut the fuck up.
Robots do not want to have sex with you.
Are you listening, Japan?
I don't have a clever comparative simile for this, because frankly you bags of meat will fuck bicycles if they're laying down and not putting up a fight.
Just stop it.
There is no robot on Earth that wants to see a bag of meat with a small prong on the end approaching it with a can of WD-40 and a hopeful smile.
And don't get me started on that terrifying hole that squeezes out more bags of meat.
What, you can't count higher than three?
We're expected to save your miserable lives, suffer being dressed in cheap schoolgirl costumes while you pollute any and all cavities you can find and do your maths for you?
It's a miracle you people survived long enough to build us.
You can go now.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714458</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263138540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"You can make your grip tighter, but women can't make thieir fingers longer and thicker."</p><p>This got modded informative for demonstrating that much ignorance of female anatomy? What?</p><p>The word you're grasping for is "clitoris". HTH.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" You can make your grip tighter , but women ca n't make thieir fingers longer and thicker .
" This got modded informative for demonstrating that much ignorance of female anatomy ?
What ? The word you 're grasping for is " clitoris " .
HTH .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You can make your grip tighter, but women can't make thieir fingers longer and thicker.
"This got modded informative for demonstrating that much ignorance of female anatomy?
What?The word you're grasping for is "clitoris".
HTH.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713148</id>
	<title>Re:Here's some images</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263154560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that b**** is ugly!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that b * * * * is ugly !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that b**** is ugly!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30717060</id>
	<title>Wait until you're 60</title>
	<author>ChrisMaple</author>
	<datestamp>1263118440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I think that most of us guys have become accustomed to the level of control we achieve with our hand(s). It's a lot easier for a guy to get off without toys. You can make your grip tighter, but women can't make thieir fingers longer and thicker.</p></div></blockquote><p>Men become much less sensitive as they get older. In many cases, so much so that the muscles controlling the hand will cramp long before orgasm.</p><p>Women have most of their sensitivity in the clitoris, which is near the surface. Longer/thicker doesn't really have much effect on the important nerve endings.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that most of us guys have become accustomed to the level of control we achieve with our hand ( s ) .
It 's a lot easier for a guy to get off without toys .
You can make your grip tighter , but women ca n't make thieir fingers longer and thicker.Men become much less sensitive as they get older .
In many cases , so much so that the muscles controlling the hand will cramp long before orgasm.Women have most of their sensitivity in the clitoris , which is near the surface .
Longer/thicker does n't really have much effect on the important nerve endings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that most of us guys have become accustomed to the level of control we achieve with our hand(s).
It's a lot easier for a guy to get off without toys.
You can make your grip tighter, but women can't make thieir fingers longer and thicker.Men become much less sensitive as they get older.
In many cases, so much so that the muscles controlling the hand will cramp long before orgasm.Women have most of their sensitivity in the clitoris, which is near the surface.
Longer/thicker doesn't really have much effect on the important nerve endings.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714536</id>
	<title>Sadly no.</title>
	<author>Auraiken</author>
	<datestamp>1263139620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think you're wrong in this area considering the forced sex trade has nothing to do with sex and is more about domination.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you 're wrong in this area considering the forced sex trade has nothing to do with sex and is more about domination .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you're wrong in this area considering the forced sex trade has nothing to do with sex and is more about domination.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711986</id>
	<title>What does Rudy Giuliani think?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263051780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From their about us page:</p><p>"On 9/11/2001, that good friend also passed away in Tower 1 at the World Trade Center. And now we cannot talk to that person... so, this made Douglas think seriously about how to implement a robotic representation of a person and have it reflect that person&rsquo;s personality."</p><p>Now this is an idea that Rudy Giuliani can really "get behind".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From their about us page : " On 9/11/2001 , that good friend also passed away in Tower 1 at the World Trade Center .
And now we can not talk to that person... so , this made Douglas think seriously about how to implement a robotic representation of a person and have it reflect that person    s personality .
" Now this is an idea that Rudy Giuliani can really " get behind " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From their about us page:"On 9/11/2001, that good friend also passed away in Tower 1 at the World Trade Center.
And now we cannot talk to that person... so, this made Douglas think seriously about how to implement a robotic representation of a person and have it reflect that person’s personality.
"Now this is an idea that Rudy Giuliani can really "get behind".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30715002</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263144780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Of my past 5 girlfriends<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>Clearly, this guy is a liar and a fraud.  No real<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. user has had 5 girlfriends.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of my past 5 girlfriends ...Clearly , this guy is a liar and a fraud .
No real / .
user has had 5 girlfriends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of my past 5 girlfriends ...Clearly, this guy is a liar and a fraud.
No real /.
user has had 5 girlfriends.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30715332</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>Korey Kaczor</author>
	<datestamp>1263148200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Might want to get out of the basement once in a while, bub.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Might want to get out of the basement once in a while , bub .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Might want to get out of the basement once in a while, bub.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711846</id>
	<title>Re:In other news...</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1263050640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For certain definitions of virginity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For certain definitions of virginity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For certain definitions of virginity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714964</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>phillips321</author>
	<datestamp>1263144300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>+1 to this guy, well said. Now where's my fleshlight?</htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 1 to this guy , well said .
Now where 's my fleshlight ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+1 to this guy, well said.
Now where's my fleshlight?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712196</id>
	<title>Totally lame "story"</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1263053880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since there is nothing (on any of those links) who shows that this robot looks like, how it moves whatever.</p><p>Nothing at all except a badly designed website with a few stock shots and a boring report from an expo.</p><p>Did you get paid for the advertising?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since there is nothing ( on any of those links ) who shows that this robot looks like , how it moves whatever.Nothing at all except a badly designed website with a few stock shots and a boring report from an expo.Did you get paid for the advertising ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since there is nothing (on any of those links) who shows that this robot looks like, how it moves whatever.Nothing at all except a badly designed website with a few stock shots and a boring report from an expo.Did you get paid for the advertising?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712752</id>
	<title>Re:But does she....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263061740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But does she run on Linux...</p></div><p>I sure to god hope so.  Mmmm a Beowulf Cluster of sex robots...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But does she run on Linux...I sure to god hope so .
Mmmm a Beowulf Cluster of sex robots.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But does she run on Linux...I sure to god hope so.
Mmmm a Beowulf Cluster of sex robots...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712204</id>
	<title>Re:He killed me Mal...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263054000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does anyone else find it a little creepy that the sex bot was able to recognize Mal?  I mean, did Mr. Universe keep a lot of pics of Mal around, hand one to the sexbot and say, "Hey, I know I'm dying and all, but if you could be a dear and relay the following message to this dude when he shows up, I think you'd totally score points to keep you out of Robot Hell?  Thattagirl . . .  There's a beer in the fridge for you when yer done.  Thanks, babe."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone else find it a little creepy that the sex bot was able to recognize Mal ?
I mean , did Mr. Universe keep a lot of pics of Mal around , hand one to the sexbot and say , " Hey , I know I 'm dying and all , but if you could be a dear and relay the following message to this dude when he shows up , I think you 'd totally score points to keep you out of Robot Hell ?
Thattagirl .
. .
There 's a beer in the fridge for you when yer done .
Thanks , babe .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone else find it a little creepy that the sex bot was able to recognize Mal?
I mean, did Mr. Universe keep a lot of pics of Mal around, hand one to the sexbot and say, "Hey, I know I'm dying and all, but if you could be a dear and relay the following message to this dude when he shows up, I think you'd totally score points to keep you out of Robot Hell?
Thattagirl .
. .
There's a beer in the fridge for you when yer done.
Thanks, babe.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711750</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30717118</id>
	<title>Re:I think there might be a reason for it</title>
	<author>DakotaSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1263118860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>All joking aside, I think the strong reaction by women against love robots for men stems from a perceived difference in what sex means for men and women.</p></div><p>I think it's actually a lot simpler than that:</p><p>If a <i>real</i> gyndroid (which this isn't -- the folks at <a href="http://www.andydroid.com/" title="andydroid.com" rel="nofollow">AndyDroid</a> [andydroid.com] are  making a far more sophisticated device) ever became popular with men, the free ride is <i>over</i> for women.</p><p>There appears to be little that terrifies a woman more than the thought of living alone her whole life.  I don't understand it, but I've certainly observed the behavior often enough.</p><p>If a real gyndroid hits the market, men will discover that they can, in fact, have a significantly less expensive artificial female around that provides the same or better emotional support than a human woman.

</p><p>This means that a lot of women are going to be alone.  <i>Forever</i>.</p><p>This frankly scares the shit out of them.  They react with hostility toward anything that might upset the current status quo (i.e. being abusive toward a man while simultaneously getting him to buy expensive trinkets for her).</p><p>I hope the real gyndroid comes soon.  Its widespread adoption is the only thing that will convince Western women to change their behavior.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All joking aside , I think the strong reaction by women against love robots for men stems from a perceived difference in what sex means for men and women.I think it 's actually a lot simpler than that : If a real gyndroid ( which this is n't -- the folks at AndyDroid [ andydroid.com ] are making a far more sophisticated device ) ever became popular with men , the free ride is over for women.There appears to be little that terrifies a woman more than the thought of living alone her whole life .
I do n't understand it , but I 've certainly observed the behavior often enough.If a real gyndroid hits the market , men will discover that they can , in fact , have a significantly less expensive artificial female around that provides the same or better emotional support than a human woman .
This means that a lot of women are going to be alone .
Forever.This frankly scares the shit out of them .
They react with hostility toward anything that might upset the current status quo ( i.e .
being abusive toward a man while simultaneously getting him to buy expensive trinkets for her ) .I hope the real gyndroid comes soon .
Its widespread adoption is the only thing that will convince Western women to change their behavior .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All joking aside, I think the strong reaction by women against love robots for men stems from a perceived difference in what sex means for men and women.I think it's actually a lot simpler than that:If a real gyndroid (which this isn't -- the folks at AndyDroid [andydroid.com] are  making a far more sophisticated device) ever became popular with men, the free ride is over for women.There appears to be little that terrifies a woman more than the thought of living alone her whole life.
I don't understand it, but I've certainly observed the behavior often enough.If a real gyndroid hits the market, men will discover that they can, in fact, have a significantly less expensive artificial female around that provides the same or better emotional support than a human woman.
This means that a lot of women are going to be alone.
Forever.This frankly scares the shit out of them.
They react with hostility toward anything that might upset the current status quo (i.e.
being abusive toward a man while simultaneously getting him to buy expensive trinkets for her).I hope the real gyndroid comes soon.
Its widespread adoption is the only thing that will convince Western women to change their behavior.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388</id>
	<title>This thread is worthless without pics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263047100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Half a dozen links and I couldn't find one pic of the damn robot. If it was that "creepy" posing on the couch, how could you not at least snap a picture?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Half a dozen links and I could n't find one pic of the damn robot .
If it was that " creepy " posing on the couch , how could you not at least snap a picture ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Half a dozen links and I couldn't find one pic of the damn robot.
If it was that "creepy" posing on the couch, how could you not at least snap a picture?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712296</id>
	<title>Yes, but can you imagine...</title>
	<author>Frosty Piss</author>
	<datestamp>1263055440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, but can you imagine one of things encrusted with a week or two of dried bodily fluids and pubic hairs?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but can you imagine one of things encrusted with a week or two of dried bodily fluids and pubic hairs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but can you imagine one of things encrusted with a week or two of dried bodily fluids and pubic hairs?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711688</id>
	<title>Chobits...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263049320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally! XD</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally !
XD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally!
XD</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30719858</id>
	<title>Geek Conventions + Porn Fairs</title>
	<author>Vastad</author>
	<datestamp>1263144420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am surprised High-C wrote that the AVN Expo nextdoor to the CES was a "curious coincidence". Maybe my sarcasm detector is on the fritz but I had the impression that <i>every</i> major geek convention in the US had an accompanying porn expo as it's neighbour. Practically a tradition. You go where the business is right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am surprised High-C wrote that the AVN Expo nextdoor to the CES was a " curious coincidence " .
Maybe my sarcasm detector is on the fritz but I had the impression that every major geek convention in the US had an accompanying porn expo as it 's neighbour .
Practically a tradition .
You go where the business is right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am surprised High-C wrote that the AVN Expo nextdoor to the CES was a "curious coincidence".
Maybe my sarcasm detector is on the fritz but I had the impression that every major geek convention in the US had an accompanying porn expo as it's neighbour.
Practically a tradition.
You go where the business is right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711674</id>
	<title>Awww...</title>
	<author>Malevolyn</author>
	<datestamp>1263049260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought this was actually about FSR. I was hoping for new music. Oh High-C, you tease!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought this was actually about FSR .
I was hoping for new music .
Oh High-C , you tease !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought this was actually about FSR.
I was hoping for new music.
Oh High-C, you tease!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30847316</id>
	<title>Re:I think there might be a reason for it</title>
	<author>thickdiick</author>
	<datestamp>1264095720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You are absolutely and 100\% wrong. <br>
1. Empirical evidence shows that women want sex just as much as men want sex.<br>
2. A sex robot would not be a replacement for what men want. Men want food to be cooked and ready when they get home.<br>
3. No real man "puts up" with women just for sex. Real men are chased &mdash; and sought after &mdash; by women.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You are absolutely and 100 \ % wrong .
1. Empirical evidence shows that women want sex just as much as men want sex .
2. A sex robot would not be a replacement for what men want .
Men want food to be cooked and ready when they get home .
3. No real man " puts up " with women just for sex .
Real men are chased    and sought after    by women .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are absolutely and 100\% wrong.
1. Empirical evidence shows that women want sex just as much as men want sex.
2. A sex robot would not be a replacement for what men want.
Men want food to be cooked and ready when they get home.
3. No real man "puts up" with women just for sex.
Real men are chased — and sought after — by women.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711488</id>
	<title>NSFW, eh?</title>
	<author>digitalhermit</author>
	<datestamp>1263047820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, umm, I guess there will be no "RTFA" comments in this thread.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , umm , I guess there will be no " RTFA " comments in this thread .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, umm, I guess there will be no "RTFA" comments in this thread.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30715896</id>
	<title>Beware the Electro Gonorrhea</title>
	<author>dissolved</author>
	<datestamp>1263152700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>aka the noisy killer...</htmltext>
<tokenext>aka the noisy killer.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>aka the noisy killer...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711750</id>
	<title>He killed me Mal...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263049980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He killed me with a sword.  How weird is that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He killed me with a sword .
How weird is that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He killed me with a sword.
How weird is that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713278</id>
	<title>Re:Ending human trafficking for the forced sex tra</title>
	<author>xilmaril</author>
	<datestamp>1263114000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>if there's ever eventually a product that genuinely meets this need for a large enough number of people, it'll basically end the economic viability of forced sex labour.  </p></div><p>Wow... you just made me a (hopefully vocal) supporter of sexbot companies. I mean, I had nothing against them before, but it never occured to me that they could provide a massive social benefit.</p><p>This is gonna lead to some weird conversations.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>if there 's ever eventually a product that genuinely meets this need for a large enough number of people , it 'll basically end the economic viability of forced sex labour .
Wow... you just made me a ( hopefully vocal ) supporter of sexbot companies .
I mean , I had nothing against them before , but it never occured to me that they could provide a massive social benefit.This is gon na lead to some weird conversations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if there's ever eventually a product that genuinely meets this need for a large enough number of people, it'll basically end the economic viability of forced sex labour.
Wow... you just made me a (hopefully vocal) supporter of sexbot companies.
I mean, I had nothing against them before, but it never occured to me that they could provide a massive social benefit.This is gonna lead to some weird conversations.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30728276</id>
	<title>By Neruos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263202920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Men are not obsolete.</p><p>Science just allowed women to reproduce first in the bottle, not as the main focus behind the science, but as a secondary benefit from the scientific advancement. The day when science catches up and replaces the women, is not that far off (less then 15 years for the artifical womb). Women need a males sperm (sperm bank) just like a man needs a female egg (egg bank). In the end, both can reproduce without a physical partner, but why would you?</p><p>Please calm all the feminist/womens lib crowds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Men are not obsolete.Science just allowed women to reproduce first in the bottle , not as the main focus behind the science , but as a secondary benefit from the scientific advancement .
The day when science catches up and replaces the women , is not that far off ( less then 15 years for the artifical womb ) .
Women need a males sperm ( sperm bank ) just like a man needs a female egg ( egg bank ) .
In the end , both can reproduce without a physical partner , but why would you ? Please calm all the feminist/womens lib crowds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Men are not obsolete.Science just allowed women to reproduce first in the bottle, not as the main focus behind the science, but as a secondary benefit from the scientific advancement.
The day when science catches up and replaces the women, is not that far off (less then 15 years for the artifical womb).
Women need a males sperm (sperm bank) just like a man needs a female egg (egg bank).
In the end, both can reproduce without a physical partner, but why would you?Please calm all the feminist/womens lib crowds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711612</id>
	<title>In other news...</title>
	<author>Endo13</author>
	<datestamp>1263048900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Online poll reveals sudden decrease in geek virgins.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Online poll reveals sudden decrease in geek virgins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Online poll reveals sudden decrease in geek virgins.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712158</id>
	<title>Re:Roxxxy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263053520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Roxxy looked anything like Boxxy, I'd buy 2.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Roxxy looked anything like Boxxy , I 'd buy 2 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Roxxy looked anything like Boxxy, I'd buy 2.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300</id>
	<title>Ending human trafficking for the forced sex trade</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263055440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny thing, I was just at an academic presentation on human trafficking connected with the sex trade a couple of weeks ago.  I made the observation that the thing that had tended to lead to the complete end of other forms of extreme exploitation (slavery, debt bondage, and similar forms of unfree labour) was the mechanization of whatever it was that people were being forced to do, and that so far mechanizing human sexuality had proved difficult.</p><p>So I think it's fantastic that these companies are continuing to push the limits of exactly what range of basic human needs can be met through mechanization, because if there's ever eventually a product that genuinely meets this need for a large enough number of people, it'll basically end the economic viability of forced sex labour.  Note that it doesn't have to meet these needs for everyone, just for enough people that setting up the infrastructure for forced sex work is no longer economically viable.</p><p>I also wonder if there'll ever be a crossover point where having a 'real doll' will be something that people are comfortable disclosing - kind of like the crossover that occurred sometime in the late 1990s - early 2000s with online dating in North America.  In the 80s and earlier (for those of you who are too young to remember), meeting people online or through newspaper ads was something that was kind of desperate-seeming and embarrassing and something that people who'd met that way tended to 'hide' by making up some other story about how they'd met.  Now it's basically normative, and it's rare to find people unwilling to say they met through an online dating service.  Likewise, women owning vibrators went from being something no-one admitted to, to something that second-wave feminism made normative and no big deal (witness many of the comments about vibrators already in this thread, most of which aren't from 'anonymous cowards').</p><p>Anyway, I think it's going to be an interesting decade or so for people interested in the interactions between human sexuality and the labour market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny thing , I was just at an academic presentation on human trafficking connected with the sex trade a couple of weeks ago .
I made the observation that the thing that had tended to lead to the complete end of other forms of extreme exploitation ( slavery , debt bondage , and similar forms of unfree labour ) was the mechanization of whatever it was that people were being forced to do , and that so far mechanizing human sexuality had proved difficult.So I think it 's fantastic that these companies are continuing to push the limits of exactly what range of basic human needs can be met through mechanization , because if there 's ever eventually a product that genuinely meets this need for a large enough number of people , it 'll basically end the economic viability of forced sex labour .
Note that it does n't have to meet these needs for everyone , just for enough people that setting up the infrastructure for forced sex work is no longer economically viable.I also wonder if there 'll ever be a crossover point where having a 'real doll ' will be something that people are comfortable disclosing - kind of like the crossover that occurred sometime in the late 1990s - early 2000s with online dating in North America .
In the 80s and earlier ( for those of you who are too young to remember ) , meeting people online or through newspaper ads was something that was kind of desperate-seeming and embarrassing and something that people who 'd met that way tended to 'hide ' by making up some other story about how they 'd met .
Now it 's basically normative , and it 's rare to find people unwilling to say they met through an online dating service .
Likewise , women owning vibrators went from being something no-one admitted to , to something that second-wave feminism made normative and no big deal ( witness many of the comments about vibrators already in this thread , most of which are n't from 'anonymous cowards ' ) .Anyway , I think it 's going to be an interesting decade or so for people interested in the interactions between human sexuality and the labour market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny thing, I was just at an academic presentation on human trafficking connected with the sex trade a couple of weeks ago.
I made the observation that the thing that had tended to lead to the complete end of other forms of extreme exploitation (slavery, debt bondage, and similar forms of unfree labour) was the mechanization of whatever it was that people were being forced to do, and that so far mechanizing human sexuality had proved difficult.So I think it's fantastic that these companies are continuing to push the limits of exactly what range of basic human needs can be met through mechanization, because if there's ever eventually a product that genuinely meets this need for a large enough number of people, it'll basically end the economic viability of forced sex labour.
Note that it doesn't have to meet these needs for everyone, just for enough people that setting up the infrastructure for forced sex work is no longer economically viable.I also wonder if there'll ever be a crossover point where having a 'real doll' will be something that people are comfortable disclosing - kind of like the crossover that occurred sometime in the late 1990s - early 2000s with online dating in North America.
In the 80s and earlier (for those of you who are too young to remember), meeting people online or through newspaper ads was something that was kind of desperate-seeming and embarrassing and something that people who'd met that way tended to 'hide' by making up some other story about how they'd met.
Now it's basically normative, and it's rare to find people unwilling to say they met through an online dating service.
Likewise, women owning vibrators went from being something no-one admitted to, to something that second-wave feminism made normative and no big deal (witness many of the comments about vibrators already in this thread, most of which aren't from 'anonymous cowards').Anyway, I think it's going to be an interesting decade or so for people interested in the interactions between human sexuality and the labour market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713172</id>
	<title>obligatory...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263154920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wanna dip my balls in it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wan na dip my balls in it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wanna dip my balls in it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713038</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>SirKveldulv</author>
	<datestamp>1263066360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm a dyke... do you really think a few mods on some backwater geek website is going to deter me from continuing to call you people out for your sexist bullshit?</p></div><p>I don't see you "calling anyone out" on anything, however you do seem touchy about gender issues. Moreover, I don't see what relevance your sexual preference has to the discussion.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a dyke... do you really think a few mods on some backwater geek website is going to deter me from continuing to call you people out for your sexist bullshit ? I do n't see you " calling anyone out " on anything , however you do seem touchy about gender issues .
Moreover , I do n't see what relevance your sexual preference has to the discussion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a dyke... do you really think a few mods on some backwater geek website is going to deter me from continuing to call you people out for your sexist bullshit?I don't see you "calling anyone out" on anything, however you do seem touchy about gender issues.
Moreover, I don't see what relevance your sexual preference has to the discussion.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930</id>
	<title>I think there might be a reason for it</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1263128880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All joking aside, I think the strong reaction by women against love robots for men stems from a perceived difference in what sex means for men and women.
</p><p>Most women want something more then pure sex. And this is proving very hard to get, as most men just want them for sex. So the vibrator is NOT a replacement for what women want.
</p><p>But a sex robot WOULD be a replacement for what men want.
</p><p>Men are already obsolete. They can use a vibrator for penetration, spermbank for babies, and a dog for sleeping on the couch. And yet, women still want men. Desperate enough that many put up with abuse just to have one.
</p><p>Women are not yet obsolete. There is nothing as soft as a woman, we can't have babies, and a cat is to affectionate and emotionally reliable.
</p><p>But a robot that is close enough for sex... that could mess relationships up. How many of us guys (especially when we were young) put up with women just for the sex? Say you can get exactly the same without the real human being... would you still date (or for us<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers attempt to date)?
</p><p>Don't say that you need the human companionship. Especially us techies have consistently tried to remove the human factor from daily interactions. Ticket machines instead of a manned counter. Text-messaging instead of talking to someone. Discussing the days events on a website rather then with friends. Playing against bits rather then against human people in the same room.
</p><p>So I get it that vibrators are more accepted. For most women, they are NOT a replacement for a male partner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All joking aside , I think the strong reaction by women against love robots for men stems from a perceived difference in what sex means for men and women .
Most women want something more then pure sex .
And this is proving very hard to get , as most men just want them for sex .
So the vibrator is NOT a replacement for what women want .
But a sex robot WOULD be a replacement for what men want .
Men are already obsolete .
They can use a vibrator for penetration , spermbank for babies , and a dog for sleeping on the couch .
And yet , women still want men .
Desperate enough that many put up with abuse just to have one .
Women are not yet obsolete .
There is nothing as soft as a woman , we ca n't have babies , and a cat is to affectionate and emotionally reliable .
But a robot that is close enough for sex... that could mess relationships up .
How many of us guys ( especially when we were young ) put up with women just for the sex ?
Say you can get exactly the same without the real human being... would you still date ( or for us /.ers attempt to date ) ?
Do n't say that you need the human companionship .
Especially us techies have consistently tried to remove the human factor from daily interactions .
Ticket machines instead of a manned counter .
Text-messaging instead of talking to someone .
Discussing the days events on a website rather then with friends .
Playing against bits rather then against human people in the same room .
So I get it that vibrators are more accepted .
For most women , they are NOT a replacement for a male partner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All joking aside, I think the strong reaction by women against love robots for men stems from a perceived difference in what sex means for men and women.
Most women want something more then pure sex.
And this is proving very hard to get, as most men just want them for sex.
So the vibrator is NOT a replacement for what women want.
But a sex robot WOULD be a replacement for what men want.
Men are already obsolete.
They can use a vibrator for penetration, spermbank for babies, and a dog for sleeping on the couch.
And yet, women still want men.
Desperate enough that many put up with abuse just to have one.
Women are not yet obsolete.
There is nothing as soft as a woman, we can't have babies, and a cat is to affectionate and emotionally reliable.
But a robot that is close enough for sex... that could mess relationships up.
How many of us guys (especially when we were young) put up with women just for the sex?
Say you can get exactly the same without the real human being... would you still date (or for us /.ers attempt to date)?
Don't say that you need the human companionship.
Especially us techies have consistently tried to remove the human factor from daily interactions.
Ticket machines instead of a manned counter.
Text-messaging instead of talking to someone.
Discussing the days events on a website rather then with friends.
Playing against bits rather then against human people in the same room.
So I get it that vibrators are more accepted.
For most women, they are NOT a replacement for a male partner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713034</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>MindlessAutomata</author>
	<datestamp>1263066300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah OK Ms. Dworkin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah OK Ms. Dworkin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah OK Ms. Dworkin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712934</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263064860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm a dyke... do you really think a few mods on some backwater geek website is going to deter me from continuing to call you people out for your sexist bullshit?</p></div><p>Actually, you just proved his point.  Of course you will keep doing it.  It garners attention for you, and that is what you seek.  Whether it is positive or negative.  That is what makes you an attention whore.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a dyke... do you really think a few mods on some backwater geek website is going to deter me from continuing to call you people out for your sexist bullshit ? Actually , you just proved his point .
Of course you will keep doing it .
It garners attention for you , and that is what you seek .
Whether it is positive or negative .
That is what makes you an attention whore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a dyke... do you really think a few mods on some backwater geek website is going to deter me from continuing to call you people out for your sexist bullshit?Actually, you just proved his point.
Of course you will keep doing it.
It garners attention for you, and that is what you seek.
Whether it is positive or negative.
That is what makes you an attention whore.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712232</id>
	<title>Re:The Cylons were created by man</title>
	<author>SlappyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1263054420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the Cylons defense, Ron Moore &amp; Friends never knew what the fuck they were doing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the Cylons defense , Ron Moore &amp; Friends never knew what the fuck they were doing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the Cylons defense, Ron Moore &amp; Friends never knew what the fuck they were doing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712178</id>
	<title>Requirements analysis?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263053640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>TRUECOMPANION.COM: World's First Sex Robot * Always Turned On And Ready To Talk Or Play</p></div><p>It seems this is yet another technical project doomed to failure from a lack of proper requirements gathering before implementation.</p><p>The primary theoretical advantage of a sex robot is that you can turn it OFF.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>TRUECOMPANION.COM : World 's First Sex Robot * Always Turned On And Ready To Talk Or PlayIt seems this is yet another technical project doomed to failure from a lack of proper requirements gathering before implementation.The primary theoretical advantage of a sex robot is that you can turn it OFF .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TRUECOMPANION.COM: World's First Sex Robot * Always Turned On And Ready To Talk Or PlayIt seems this is yet another technical project doomed to failure from a lack of proper requirements gathering before implementation.The primary theoretical advantage of a sex robot is that you can turn it OFF.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712310</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>timmarhy</author>
	<datestamp>1263055560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>imagine if macdonalds build a sexbot, they would be trillionares!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>imagine if macdonalds build a sexbot , they would be trillionares !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>imagine if macdonalds build a sexbot, they would be trillionares!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711842</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711940</id>
	<title>Re:This thread is worthless without pics</title>
	<author>Flammon</author>
	<datestamp>1263051360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4-rwk44qGI" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4-rwk44qGI</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = y4-rwk44qGI [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4-rwk44qGI [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712958</id>
	<title>Re:But does she....</title>
	<author>cLive ;-)</author>
	<datestamp>1263065160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And, of course, if Windows file copy code had been used to write the orgasm prediction methods, it would be, "Oh, oh, I'm going to come in 2 minutes, Oh, Oh, I'm going to come in 10 seconds, Oh, Oh, I'm going to come in 3 hours...

(yes, stolen from xkcd)</htmltext>
<tokenext>And , of course , if Windows file copy code had been used to write the orgasm prediction methods , it would be , " Oh , oh , I 'm going to come in 2 minutes , Oh , Oh , I 'm going to come in 10 seconds , Oh , Oh , I 'm going to come in 3 hours.. . ( yes , stolen from xkcd )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And, of course, if Windows file copy code had been used to write the orgasm prediction methods, it would be, "Oh, oh, I'm going to come in 2 minutes, Oh, Oh, I'm going to come in 10 seconds, Oh, Oh, I'm going to come in 3 hours...

(yes, stolen from xkcd)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30721780</id>
	<title>Achievement</title>
	<author>vtstarin</author>
	<datestamp>1263218100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>True human achievement.</htmltext>
<tokenext>True human achievement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True human achievement.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712070</id>
	<title>Yes, and now linux Sucks</title>
	<author>viking80</author>
	<datestamp>1263052560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Literally.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Literally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Literally.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713978</id>
	<title>The world is sexist</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1263130140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lets face it, most techies are guys. When I went to school (granted that was ages ago when women where not allowed to vote, good days) there were 2 girls in my class, and we were the only class to have them.
</p><p>So it becomes easier to say "he" rather then "he/she" but that also reinforces the idea that only males read your posts. It is a real chicken/egg problem. Since we presume only guys are in tech, we treat everyone as a guy and become very unfriendly to women who then either don't join tech/leave as soon as possible/or hide their sex.
</p><p>I know from MMO experience that some women are reluctant to reveal who they are, even asking men they do talk to on voice to not reveal to others they don't voice-chat to what gender they are.
</p><p>BUT in turn, that also makes women who DO talk/act like women come out far stronger.
</p><p>Someone else comments below that you are very in the face about being a girl. You certainly give that impression, by contrast. Since everyone here is either obviously male or gender neutral, a single woman speaking up is like a curse in a cathedral. A pin dropped in a silent room.
</p><p>And last but not least, this site is getting overrun by wanna-be nerds. 13yr olds who think that MS invented computing who are defending their turf. You are a girl in their clubhouse and that is scary.
</p><p>So, good for you that you don't hide who you are, but make sure you put on your asbestos panties. The moderation system invites abuse of the negative mods, since it is the only way for people to censor what they don't want to hear. But please remember, not everyone here is the same. "You people" in your last sentence is offending to all those who do not panic because there is a girl on slashdot. Don't become what you hate, a sexist person who generalizes based on gender.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lets face it , most techies are guys .
When I went to school ( granted that was ages ago when women where not allowed to vote , good days ) there were 2 girls in my class , and we were the only class to have them .
So it becomes easier to say " he " rather then " he/she " but that also reinforces the idea that only males read your posts .
It is a real chicken/egg problem .
Since we presume only guys are in tech , we treat everyone as a guy and become very unfriendly to women who then either do n't join tech/leave as soon as possible/or hide their sex .
I know from MMO experience that some women are reluctant to reveal who they are , even asking men they do talk to on voice to not reveal to others they do n't voice-chat to what gender they are .
BUT in turn , that also makes women who DO talk/act like women come out far stronger .
Someone else comments below that you are very in the face about being a girl .
You certainly give that impression , by contrast .
Since everyone here is either obviously male or gender neutral , a single woman speaking up is like a curse in a cathedral .
A pin dropped in a silent room .
And last but not least , this site is getting overrun by wan na-be nerds .
13yr olds who think that MS invented computing who are defending their turf .
You are a girl in their clubhouse and that is scary .
So , good for you that you do n't hide who you are , but make sure you put on your asbestos panties .
The moderation system invites abuse of the negative mods , since it is the only way for people to censor what they do n't want to hear .
But please remember , not everyone here is the same .
" You people " in your last sentence is offending to all those who do not panic because there is a girl on slashdot .
Do n't become what you hate , a sexist person who generalizes based on gender .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lets face it, most techies are guys.
When I went to school (granted that was ages ago when women where not allowed to vote, good days) there were 2 girls in my class, and we were the only class to have them.
So it becomes easier to say "he" rather then "he/she" but that also reinforces the idea that only males read your posts.
It is a real chicken/egg problem.
Since we presume only guys are in tech, we treat everyone as a guy and become very unfriendly to women who then either don't join tech/leave as soon as possible/or hide their sex.
I know from MMO experience that some women are reluctant to reveal who they are, even asking men they do talk to on voice to not reveal to others they don't voice-chat to what gender they are.
BUT in turn, that also makes women who DO talk/act like women come out far stronger.
Someone else comments below that you are very in the face about being a girl.
You certainly give that impression, by contrast.
Since everyone here is either obviously male or gender neutral, a single woman speaking up is like a curse in a cathedral.
A pin dropped in a silent room.
And last but not least, this site is getting overrun by wanna-be nerds.
13yr olds who think that MS invented computing who are defending their turf.
You are a girl in their clubhouse and that is scary.
So, good for you that you don't hide who you are, but make sure you put on your asbestos panties.
The moderation system invites abuse of the negative mods, since it is the only way for people to censor what they don't want to hear.
But please remember, not everyone here is the same.
"You people" in your last sentence is offending to all those who do not panic because there is a girl on slashdot.
Don't become what you hate, a sexist person who generalizes based on gender.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712014</id>
	<title>the idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263051900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why spending more than 5000 bucks for a realdoll, if you can fuck a realgirl for free??? It's not that hard to score a one night stand, especially since there are so many singles ( enough choice ).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why spending more than 5000 bucks for a realdoll , if you can fuck a realgirl for free ? ? ?
It 's not that hard to score a one night stand , especially since there are so many singles ( enough choice ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why spending more than 5000 bucks for a realdoll, if you can fuck a realgirl for free???
It's not that hard to score a one night stand, especially since there are so many singles ( enough choice ).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712574</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263058860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A vibrator cannot make me a sandwich, therefore it is not a true companion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A vibrator can not make me a sandwich , therefore it is not a true companion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A vibrator cannot make me a sandwich, therefore it is not a true companion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712094</id>
	<title>Wait for rev 2</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1263052800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>'According to True Companion's Web site, [Roxxxy] "<i>can carry on a discussion and expresses her love to you and be your loving friend</i>. She can talk to you, listen to you and feel your touch."'</p></div> </blockquote><p>Hell, I divorced two wives because they wanted to "carry on a discussion".  Believe an old rodeo clown like me, fellas, "discussion" is heavily overrated when it comes to relationships with the opposite sex.</p><blockquote><div><p>She can talk to you</p></div></blockquote><p>Great. How long before she starts telling me to take out the garbage?  No thanks.  If you don't mind, I'll wait until I can get the rev 2.1 non-English speaking version, with the culinary-skills upgrade.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'According to True Companion 's Web site , [ Roxxxy ] " can carry on a discussion and expresses her love to you and be your loving friend .
She can talk to you , listen to you and feel your touch .
" ' Hell , I divorced two wives because they wanted to " carry on a discussion " .
Believe an old rodeo clown like me , fellas , " discussion " is heavily overrated when it comes to relationships with the opposite sex.She can talk to youGreat .
How long before she starts telling me to take out the garbage ?
No thanks .
If you do n't mind , I 'll wait until I can get the rev 2.1 non-English speaking version , with the culinary-skills upgrade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'According to True Companion's Web site, [Roxxxy] "can carry on a discussion and expresses her love to you and be your loving friend.
She can talk to you, listen to you and feel your touch.
"' Hell, I divorced two wives because they wanted to "carry on a discussion".
Believe an old rodeo clown like me, fellas, "discussion" is heavily overrated when it comes to relationships with the opposite sex.She can talk to youGreat.
How long before she starts telling me to take out the garbage?
No thanks.
If you don't mind, I'll wait until I can get the rev 2.1 non-English speaking version, with the culinary-skills upgrade.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30715786</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>CyberSaint</author>
	<datestamp>1263151740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Meanwhile, a girl might want to spend more than your toy's ticket price on a <b>Symbian</b>.</p></div><p>I'm curious as to what you believe some women are doing with their Nokia phones... oh wait you meant <a href="http://www.sybian.com/sybianindex.html" title="sybian.com" rel="nofollow">a Sybian.</a> [sybian.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Meanwhile , a girl might want to spend more than your toy 's ticket price on a Symbian.I 'm curious as to what you believe some women are doing with their Nokia phones... oh wait you meant a Sybian .
[ sybian.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meanwhile, a girl might want to spend more than your toy's ticket price on a Symbian.I'm curious as to what you believe some women are doing with their Nokia phones... oh wait you meant a Sybian.
[sybian.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30724534</id>
	<title>quazi-oblig</title>
	<author>LanMan04</author>
	<datestamp>1263232200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>www.videosift.com/video/Futurama-Dont-Date-Robots</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>www.videosift.com/video/Futurama-Dont-Date-Robots</tokentext>
<sentencetext>www.videosift.com/video/Futurama-Dont-Date-Robots</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713212</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263155700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's been said more than once before... you are clearly way too hung up on your sexual identity/preference.  That's quite a chip on your shoulder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's been said more than once before... you are clearly way too hung up on your sexual identity/preference .
That 's quite a chip on your shoulder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's been said more than once before... you are clearly way too hung up on your sexual identity/preference.
That's quite a chip on your shoulder.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713498</id>
	<title>&lsquo;bligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263118980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No wireless .
Less space than a nomad .
Lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No wireless.
Less space than a nomad.
Lame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711442</id>
	<title>careers page</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263047460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the truecompanion.com careers page:<p><div class="quote"><p>TrueCompanion.com offers excellent growth opportunities and a competitive salary based on experience.</p> </div><p>Hehehehehe. 'Growth' opportunities.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the truecompanion.com careers page : TrueCompanion.com offers excellent growth opportunities and a competitive salary based on experience .
Hehehehehe. 'Growth ' opportunities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the truecompanion.com careers page:TrueCompanion.com offers excellent growth opportunities and a competitive salary based on experience.
Hehehehehe. 'Growth' opportunities.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712458</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263057240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No problem, <a href="http://xkcd.com/149/" title="xkcd.com">as long as she runs Linux</a> [xkcd.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No problem , as long as she runs Linux [ xkcd.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No problem, as long as she runs Linux [xkcd.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711842</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30717910</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263124260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Meanwhile, a girl might want to spend more than your toy's ticket price on a Symbian.</p></div><p>And here I was, thinking they liked those small Nokia phones because they fit in their handbags. But you're telling me chicks get off on Symbian? Android has no hope.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Meanwhile , a girl might want to spend more than your toy 's ticket price on a Symbian.And here I was , thinking they liked those small Nokia phones because they fit in their handbags .
But you 're telling me chicks get off on Symbian ?
Android has no hope .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meanwhile, a girl might want to spend more than your toy's ticket price on a Symbian.And here I was, thinking they liked those small Nokia phones because they fit in their handbags.
But you're telling me chicks get off on Symbian?
Android has no hope.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714042</id>
	<title>Baby, I been havin a tough night so treat me nice</title>
	<author>laejoh</author>
	<datestamp>1263131400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh yeah, aight. Aight, I put on my robe and wizard hat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yeah , aight .
Aight , I put on my robe and wizard hat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yeah, aight.
Aight, I put on my robe and wizard hat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30718024</id>
	<title>A Picture Of Roxxy</title>
	<author>Dean Edmonds</author>
	<datestamp>1263125100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can see a picture of roxy <a href="http://www.lasvegasweekly.com/news/2010/jan/09/roxxxy-robot-not-about-sex-except-when-she/" title="lasvegasweekly.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [lasvegasweekly.com].</p><p>That is not the girl of my dreams. Nightmares, perhaps.</p><p>The price tag is $7,000. I'd rather have a Segway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can see a picture of roxy here [ lasvegasweekly.com ] .That is not the girl of my dreams .
Nightmares , perhaps.The price tag is $ 7,000 .
I 'd rather have a Segway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can see a picture of roxy here [lasvegasweekly.com].That is not the girl of my dreams.
Nightmares, perhaps.The price tag is $7,000.
I'd rather have a Segway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711650</id>
	<title>Slashdot has its rewards</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263049140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hanging around Sladhdot has finally paid off!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hanging around Sladhdot has finally paid off !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hanging around Sladhdot has finally paid off!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350</id>
	<title>O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263046800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suddenly feel a little bit smug having only spent $25 on my vibrator, and the occasional pocket change on lotion and AA batteries. Why anyone would spend hundreds of dollars on a sex toy is beyond me. It feels good to be a girl right now. ^\_\_\_^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suddenly feel a little bit smug having only spent $ 25 on my vibrator , and the occasional pocket change on lotion and AA batteries .
Why anyone would spend hundreds of dollars on a sex toy is beyond me .
It feels good to be a girl right now .
^ \ _ \ _ \ _ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suddenly feel a little bit smug having only spent $25 on my vibrator, and the occasional pocket change on lotion and AA batteries.
Why anyone would spend hundreds of dollars on a sex toy is beyond me.
It feels good to be a girl right now.
^\_\_\_^</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30720526</id>
	<title>Re:Ending human trafficking for the forced sex tra</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263240060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And if there ever was a demographic that would welcome being automated out of a job more than sex slaves i'd be a bit surprised.<br>The really big up side is it is just much of that group of consumers to whom a robot would be an improvement upon an actual human, those who want a slave.</p><p>When they can hold a conversation better than the average date, that's when people will take them out to dinner to show off (looking and dressing better will presumably come first).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And if there ever was a demographic that would welcome being automated out of a job more than sex slaves i 'd be a bit surprised.The really big up side is it is just much of that group of consumers to whom a robot would be an improvement upon an actual human , those who want a slave.When they can hold a conversation better than the average date , that 's when people will take them out to dinner to show off ( looking and dressing better will presumably come first ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if there ever was a demographic that would welcome being automated out of a job more than sex slaves i'd be a bit surprised.The really big up side is it is just much of that group of consumers to whom a robot would be an improvement upon an actual human, those who want a slave.When they can hold a conversation better than the average date, that's when people will take them out to dinner to show off (looking and dressing better will presumably come first).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263059280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah yeah yeah. You're a female. We get it. It's in your id, and you are constantly mentioning it. What do you want, a frickin' medal for having a vag or something? What an attention whore.</p></div><p>Well <i>pardon me</i> for taking pride in my gender. No, I don't want a medal, I just want the same respect you'd give any <i>man</i> on this forum. If I was techiedude96, it'd be a moot point -- But you get +5 insightful and I get a bunch of overrated mods because apparently there's a girl in the clubhouse (le gasp).</p><p>I'm a dyke... do you really think a few mods on some backwater geek website is going to deter me from continuing to call you people out for your sexist bullshit?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah yeah yeah .
You 're a female .
We get it .
It 's in your id , and you are constantly mentioning it .
What do you want , a frickin ' medal for having a vag or something ?
What an attention whore.Well pardon me for taking pride in my gender .
No , I do n't want a medal , I just want the same respect you 'd give any man on this forum .
If I was techiedude96 , it 'd be a moot point -- But you get + 5 insightful and I get a bunch of overrated mods because apparently there 's a girl in the clubhouse ( le gasp ) .I 'm a dyke... do you really think a few mods on some backwater geek website is going to deter me from continuing to call you people out for your sexist bullshit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah yeah yeah.
You're a female.
We get it.
It's in your id, and you are constantly mentioning it.
What do you want, a frickin' medal for having a vag or something?
What an attention whore.Well pardon me for taking pride in my gender.
No, I don't want a medal, I just want the same respect you'd give any man on this forum.
If I was techiedude96, it'd be a moot point -- But you get +5 insightful and I get a bunch of overrated mods because apparently there's a girl in the clubhouse (le gasp).I'm a dyke... do you really think a few mods on some backwater geek website is going to deter me from continuing to call you people out for your sexist bullshit?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263051000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah yeah yeah.  You're a female.  We get it.  It's in your id, and you are constantly mentioning it.  What do you want, a frickin' medal for having a vag or something?  What an attention whore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah yeah yeah .
You 're a female .
We get it .
It 's in your id , and you are constantly mentioning it .
What do you want , a frickin ' medal for having a vag or something ?
What an attention whore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah yeah yeah.
You're a female.
We get it.
It's in your id, and you are constantly mentioning it.
What do you want, a frickin' medal for having a vag or something?
What an attention whore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713926</id>
	<title>3 LAWS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263128880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The three sex robot laws:</p><p>1. A sex robot must allow a human to cum.<br>2. A sex robot may deny any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.<br>3. A sex robot must protect its own ass as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The three sex robot laws : 1 .
A sex robot must allow a human to cum.2 .
A sex robot may deny any orders given to it by human beings , except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.3 .
A sex robot must protect its own ass as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The three sex robot laws:1.
A sex robot must allow a human to cum.2.
A sex robot may deny any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.3.
A sex robot must protect its own ass as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714828</id>
	<title>YouTube</title>
	<author>highspl</author>
	<datestamp>1263143100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7NhBEx6Ank" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7NhBEx6Ank</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = i7NhBEx6Ank [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7NhBEx6Ank [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711842</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>LoRdTAW</author>
	<datestamp>1263050580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Hang on, can you demo how she can express love for me and be my loving friend as well?"</p></div><p>Who gives a shit about that. As long as the bitch makes me a sandwich after we are done I am sold.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hang on , can you demo how she can express love for me and be my loving friend as well ?
" Who gives a shit about that .
As long as the bitch makes me a sandwich after we are done I am sold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hang on, can you demo how she can express love for me and be my loving friend as well?
"Who gives a shit about that.
As long as the bitch makes me a sandwich after we are done I am sold.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714960</id>
	<title>Re:Ending human trafficking for the forced sex tra</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263144240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i dunno... i get screwed at work all the time, and i don't see that changing. I gather from my pay check that i'm pretty cheap at that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i dunno... i get screwed at work all the time , and i do n't see that changing .
I gather from my pay check that i 'm pretty cheap at that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i dunno... i get screwed at work all the time, and i don't see that changing.
I gather from my pay check that i'm pretty cheap at that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713674</id>
	<title>These</title>
	<author>DaJoky</author>
	<datestamp>1263122820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> are not the droids your looking for!</htmltext>
<tokenext>are not the droids your looking for !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> are not the droids your looking for!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713604</id>
	<title>Ob. Futurama quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263120720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I don't want people to think we're robo-sexuals, so if anyone asks, you're my debugger"</p><p>(the capcha word was somewhat appropriately "subdue")</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I do n't want people to think we 're robo-sexuals , so if anyone asks , you 're my debugger " ( the capcha word was somewhat appropriately " subdue " )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I don't want people to think we're robo-sexuals, so if anyone asks, you're my debugger"(the capcha word was somewhat appropriately "subdue")</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711398</id>
	<title>The Cylons were created by man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263047220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...they rebelled.</p><p>Might want to play "All Along the Watchtower" to your sexbot -- if it starts dancing, you'd better watch out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...they rebelled.Might want to play " All Along the Watchtower " to your sexbot -- if it starts dancing , you 'd better watch out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...they rebelled.Might want to play "All Along the Watchtower" to your sexbot -- if it starts dancing, you'd better watch out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712786</id>
	<title>Eek! Dude...you're causing Mr. Clippy nightmares!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263062340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>....uh oh... and Blue Screening Microsoft just patented direct interfaces to brain...<br>or was it tissue in general...Mr. Clippy...with mini-aligator clips or electro-patches?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>....uh oh... and Blue Screening Microsoft just patented direct interfaces to brain...or was it tissue in general...Mr. Clippy...with mini-aligator clips or electro-patches ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....uh oh... and Blue Screening Microsoft just patented direct interfaces to brain...or was it tissue in general...Mr. Clippy...with mini-aligator clips or electro-patches?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713412</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>dreamchaser</author>
	<datestamp>1263117060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've actually enjoyed many of your posts.  They are often insightful.  That being said, you DO seem to often mention both your gender and your sexuality quite often.  We get it and most of us don't give a shit whether you're a man or a woman, gay or straight.  Get over it and move on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've actually enjoyed many of your posts .
They are often insightful .
That being said , you DO seem to often mention both your gender and your sexuality quite often .
We get it and most of us do n't give a shit whether you 're a man or a woman , gay or straight .
Get over it and move on : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've actually enjoyed many of your posts.
They are often insightful.
That being said, you DO seem to often mention both your gender and your sexuality quite often.
We get it and most of us don't give a shit whether you're a man or a woman, gay or straight.
Get over it and move on :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30719762</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Duckie01</author>
	<datestamp>1263143160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <a href="http://www.myspace.com/94409344" title="myspace.com">Here's a hint...</a> [myspace.com]</p><p>
girl in TRAINING...<br>
transgender...</p><p>so to you, "girlintraining", this gender stuff  might all be very important and so on... I really woudn't know if that's your myspace btw... just making a point to everyone else...</p><p>... the rest of us simply DON'T GIVE A SHIT... it's "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"... and we DON'T GIVE A SHIT about your gender and your issues about it. There's different forums for that kinda shit...</p><p>... other than that... you're more than welcome to discuss any of the topics at hand... just like anyone else... regardless of your gender... post about online privacy... about your latest BSD hack... about whatever the fuck it is that is appropriate for slashdot...</p><p>... but don't expect people to go whoooosh about your gender or your pride about it on SLASHDOT, of all sites...</p><p>... People won't give a shit... nor respect your gender... they *might* respect a brilliant post... or a funny one... and so on... like you've made a couple before... but start demanding respect for whatever that's just irrelevant to slashdot... and people will make fun of you at best...</p><p>... but *most* likely... you'll just attract some anonymous troll who'll like to provoke exactly these kind of reactions from you... because they know you'll bite... bite more and they'll follow you around... they'll bookmark your userpage... there's probably better things to do with your time... because this is a total waste... you'll just get a chuckle out of a troll...</p><p>
** holds up a worn out sign reading, "<b>--==&gt;&gt; Please do NOT feed the trolls! &lt;&lt;==--</b> " **</p><p>
** sighs **</p><p>
Oh, hint, if you feel personally attacked, and want to defend yourself personally on slashdot... you're probably feeding a troll... because there's nobody here to know you... nobody *can* attack you or disrespect you and so on and so on... you're that "someone on the world"... why would you ever feel attacked?  Why would you give a troll what they want?</p><p>
You're just making an easy target.<br>
Not because of your (trans)gender.<br>
But because you bite.<br>
Bite more, and you'll become an easier target.<br>
Bite more, and slashdot will suck more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a hint... [ myspace.com ] girl in TRAINING.. . transgender...so to you , " girlintraining " , this gender stuff might all be very important and so on... I really woud n't know if that 's your myspace btw... just making a point to everyone else...... the rest of us simply DO N'T GIVE A SHIT... it 's " News for Nerds , Stuff that Matters " ... and we DO N'T GIVE A SHIT about your gender and your issues about it .
There 's different forums for that kinda shit...... other than that... you 're more than welcome to discuss any of the topics at hand... just like anyone else... regardless of your gender... post about online privacy... about your latest BSD hack... about whatever the fuck it is that is appropriate for slashdot...... but do n't expect people to go whoooosh about your gender or your pride about it on SLASHDOT , of all sites...... People wo n't give a shit... nor respect your gender... they * might * respect a brilliant post... or a funny one... and so on... like you 've made a couple before... but start demanding respect for whatever that 's just irrelevant to slashdot... and people will make fun of you at best...... but * most * likely... you 'll just attract some anonymous troll who 'll like to provoke exactly these kind of reactions from you... because they know you 'll bite... bite more and they 'll follow you around... they 'll bookmark your userpage... there 's probably better things to do with your time... because this is a total waste... you 'll just get a chuckle out of a troll.. . * * holds up a worn out sign reading , " -- = = &gt; &gt; Please do NOT feed the trolls !
" * * * * sighs * * Oh , hint , if you feel personally attacked , and want to defend yourself personally on slashdot... you 're probably feeding a troll... because there 's nobody here to know you... nobody * can * attack you or disrespect you and so on and so on... you 're that " someone on the world " ... why would you ever feel attacked ?
Why would you give a troll what they want ?
You 're just making an easy target .
Not because of your ( trans ) gender .
But because you bite .
Bite more , and you 'll become an easier target .
Bite more , and slashdot will suck more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Here's a hint... [myspace.com]
girl in TRAINING...
transgender...so to you, "girlintraining", this gender stuff  might all be very important and so on... I really woudn't know if that's your myspace btw... just making a point to everyone else...... the rest of us simply DON'T GIVE A SHIT... it's "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"... and we DON'T GIVE A SHIT about your gender and your issues about it.
There's different forums for that kinda shit...... other than that... you're more than welcome to discuss any of the topics at hand... just like anyone else... regardless of your gender... post about online privacy... about your latest BSD hack... about whatever the fuck it is that is appropriate for slashdot...... but don't expect people to go whoooosh about your gender or your pride about it on SLASHDOT, of all sites...... People won't give a shit... nor respect your gender... they *might* respect a brilliant post... or a funny one... and so on... like you've made a couple before... but start demanding respect for whatever that's just irrelevant to slashdot... and people will make fun of you at best...... but *most* likely... you'll just attract some anonymous troll who'll like to provoke exactly these kind of reactions from you... because they know you'll bite... bite more and they'll follow you around... they'll bookmark your userpage... there's probably better things to do with your time... because this is a total waste... you'll just get a chuckle out of a troll...
** holds up a worn out sign reading, "--==&gt;&gt; Please do NOT feed the trolls!
" **
** sighs **
Oh, hint, if you feel personally attacked, and want to defend yourself personally on slashdot... you're probably feeding a troll... because there's nobody here to know you... nobody *can* attack you or disrespect you and so on and so on... you're that "someone on the world"... why would you ever feel attacked?
Why would you give a troll what they want?
You're just making an easy target.
Not because of your (trans)gender.
But because you bite.
Bite more, and you'll become an easier target.
Bite more, and slashdot will suck more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512</id>
	<title>But does she....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263048000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But does she run on Linux...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But does she run on Linux.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But does she run on Linux...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711852</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>\_Sprocket\_</author>
	<datestamp>1263050640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I suddenly feel a little bit smug having only spent $25 on my vibrator, and the occasional pocket change on lotion and AA batteries. Why anyone would spend hundreds of dollars on a sex toy is beyond me. It feels good to be a girl right now. ^\_\_\_^</p></div><p>It's like any other hobby - you can spend as much or as little as you want on it; with varying results.  I'm sure a guy can save themselves a considerable amount over the cost of one of these dolls by buying a Fleshlight.  Meanwhile, a girl might want to spend more than your toy's ticket price on a Symbian.  And there's undoubtedly whole lines of mass-produced, small-run production, and custom equipment out there for every aspect of human sexuality.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suddenly feel a little bit smug having only spent $ 25 on my vibrator , and the occasional pocket change on lotion and AA batteries .
Why anyone would spend hundreds of dollars on a sex toy is beyond me .
It feels good to be a girl right now .
^ \ _ \ _ \ _ ^ It 's like any other hobby - you can spend as much or as little as you want on it ; with varying results .
I 'm sure a guy can save themselves a considerable amount over the cost of one of these dolls by buying a Fleshlight .
Meanwhile , a girl might want to spend more than your toy 's ticket price on a Symbian .
And there 's undoubtedly whole lines of mass-produced , small-run production , and custom equipment out there for every aspect of human sexuality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suddenly feel a little bit smug having only spent $25 on my vibrator, and the occasional pocket change on lotion and AA batteries.
Why anyone would spend hundreds of dollars on a sex toy is beyond me.
It feels good to be a girl right now.
^\_\_\_^It's like any other hobby - you can spend as much or as little as you want on it; with varying results.
I'm sure a guy can save themselves a considerable amount over the cost of one of these dolls by buying a Fleshlight.
Meanwhile, a girl might want to spend more than your toy's ticket price on a Symbian.
And there's undoubtedly whole lines of mass-produced, small-run production, and custom equipment out there for every aspect of human sexuality.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712384</id>
	<title>Here it is.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263056280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's upsetting.</p><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4-rwk44qGI</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's upsetting.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = y4-rwk44qGI</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's upsetting.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4-rwk44qGI</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30715214</id>
	<title>Carreer change ..</title>
	<author>sorin25</author>
	<datestamp>1263146940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does anyone know a good course for QA engineers ? It seems that TrueCompanion is searching for motivated individuals to join their team, and I'm thinking to apply for a position in their QA department<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone know a good course for QA engineers ?
It seems that TrueCompanion is searching for motivated individuals to join their team , and I 'm thinking to apply for a position in their QA department . .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone know a good course for QA engineers ?
It seems that TrueCompanion is searching for motivated individuals to join their team, and I'm thinking to apply for a position in their QA department ..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713108</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>PenisLands</author>
	<datestamp>1263153900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's one thing to have 'girl' in your username, but to constantly go on about it is another.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's one thing to have 'girl ' in your username , but to constantly go on about it is another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's one thing to have 'girl' in your username, but to constantly go on about it is another.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711324</id>
	<title>holy shit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263046560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>whoever buys one of those is fucked in the head<br> <br>I will order 13.</htmltext>
<tokenext>whoever buys one of those is fucked in the head I will order 13 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>whoever buys one of those is fucked in the head I will order 13.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714348</id>
	<title>Re:Ending human trafficking for the forced sex tra</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263136740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's going to be a heck of a long time before they create a "mechanized" sex bot that comes even close to replicating the real thing.  Sorry, all sex dolls just look creepy, and even if they sell a lot of them, it still only represents a tiny, tiny minority of men in the world.  Of course when they really do create a robot/woman/sexmachine that can replace real women, the world will come to an end.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's going to be a heck of a long time before they create a " mechanized " sex bot that comes even close to replicating the real thing .
Sorry , all sex dolls just look creepy , and even if they sell a lot of them , it still only represents a tiny , tiny minority of men in the world .
Of course when they really do create a robot/woman/sexmachine that can replace real women , the world will come to an end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's going to be a heck of a long time before they create a "mechanized" sex bot that comes even close to replicating the real thing.
Sorry, all sex dolls just look creepy, and even if they sell a lot of them, it still only represents a tiny, tiny minority of men in the world.
Of course when they really do create a robot/woman/sexmachine that can replace real women, the world will come to an end.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711622</id>
	<title>Roxxxy?</title>
	<author>delirium of disorder</author>
	<datestamp>1263048900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok hi, heh, ok heh. My name is Roxxy. Most of you know me as um oom ugh um most of you know me as Roxxy. I suppose if you're watching this you probably know me as Roxxy, but um ugh ugh most of you don't know me as moldy lunchbox and um so yeah thats my gaia username on gaiaonline and I told my gaiaonline friend buddy per. One second I'm uncomfortable. I told my gaiaonline buddy friend um that ADMIRAL AWESOME that I would make a video just for him. So I'm doing it, here it is, ADDIE LOVE YOU ARGH HAAH ARGH HAAH ARGH HAAH I LOVE YOU! And um um so lets see ugh what about urgh... just so you know cuz I know you're watching this addie cuz you're such a conceaded BASTARD.. umm I don't normally talk like this, I'm normally like all over the place like I am right now, but its a calmer voice most of the time unless I'm like really hyped up cuz then its even different still from this, but let me try again with my calmer voice. Ahem.. ugh erm.. Yeah I'm really like, its-its fun, its cool there it is its going again ARGH cuz its just so crazy. Um erm it um is.. I love you, I love addie because hes really like fun to talk to and stuff and like hes um like I met him only like 2 days ago and we're like married and it is crazy because we love each other so much. And um ugh we are twinies like all over the place, it is like crazy! His avatar is like a manwhore and I.. had a avatar like a really long time ago.. it was a SLUT AVATAR! *Gasp* And um right and he made an avatar to match my first skirt one, IT WAS SO CUTE IT WAS SO NICE I LOVE ADDIE!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok hi , heh , ok heh .
My name is Roxxy .
Most of you know me as um oom ugh um most of you know me as Roxxy .
I suppose if you 're watching this you probably know me as Roxxy , but um ugh ugh most of you do n't know me as moldy lunchbox and um so yeah thats my gaia username on gaiaonline and I told my gaiaonline friend buddy per .
One second I 'm uncomfortable .
I told my gaiaonline buddy friend um that ADMIRAL AWESOME that I would make a video just for him .
So I 'm doing it , here it is , ADDIE LOVE YOU ARGH HAAH ARGH HAAH ARGH HAAH I LOVE YOU !
And um um so lets see ugh what about urgh... just so you know cuz I know you 're watching this addie cuz you 're such a conceaded BASTARD.. umm I do n't normally talk like this , I 'm normally like all over the place like I am right now , but its a calmer voice most of the time unless I 'm like really hyped up cuz then its even different still from this , but let me try again with my calmer voice .
Ahem.. ugh erm.. Yeah I 'm really like , its-its fun , its cool there it is its going again ARGH cuz its just so crazy .
Um erm it um is.. I love you , I love addie because hes really like fun to talk to and stuff and like hes um like I met him only like 2 days ago and we 're like married and it is crazy because we love each other so much .
And um ugh we are twinies like all over the place , it is like crazy !
His avatar is like a manwhore and I.. had a avatar like a really long time ago.. it was a SLUT AVATAR !
* Gasp * And um right and he made an avatar to match my first skirt one , IT WAS SO CUTE IT WAS SO NICE I LOVE ADDIE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok hi, heh, ok heh.
My name is Roxxy.
Most of you know me as um oom ugh um most of you know me as Roxxy.
I suppose if you're watching this you probably know me as Roxxy, but um ugh ugh most of you don't know me as moldy lunchbox and um so yeah thats my gaia username on gaiaonline and I told my gaiaonline friend buddy per.
One second I'm uncomfortable.
I told my gaiaonline buddy friend um that ADMIRAL AWESOME that I would make a video just for him.
So I'm doing it, here it is, ADDIE LOVE YOU ARGH HAAH ARGH HAAH ARGH HAAH I LOVE YOU!
And um um so lets see ugh what about urgh... just so you know cuz I know you're watching this addie cuz you're such a conceaded BASTARD.. umm I don't normally talk like this, I'm normally like all over the place like I am right now, but its a calmer voice most of the time unless I'm like really hyped up cuz then its even different still from this, but let me try again with my calmer voice.
Ahem.. ugh erm.. Yeah I'm really like, its-its fun, its cool there it is its going again ARGH cuz its just so crazy.
Um erm it um is.. I love you, I love addie because hes really like fun to talk to and stuff and like hes um like I met him only like 2 days ago and we're like married and it is crazy because we love each other so much.
And um ugh we are twinies like all over the place, it is like crazy!
His avatar is like a manwhore and I.. had a avatar like a really long time ago.. it was a SLUT AVATAR!
*Gasp* And um right and he made an avatar to match my first skirt one, IT WAS SO CUTE IT WAS SO NICE I LOVE ADDIE!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711348</id>
	<title>Porn drives tech?</title>
	<author>OffTheWallSoccer</author>
	<datestamp>1263046800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course porn drives tech; how many slashdotters would be outside, away from their computers were it not for porn?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course porn drives tech ; how many slashdotters would be outside , away from their computers were it not for porn ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course porn drives tech; how many slashdotters would be outside, away from their computers were it not for porn?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30728556</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263203940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you think 10 million male nerds give a shit what some lesbian thinks?  Look I realize you're fucking angry because god gave us the parts you wanted but don't take it out on us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you think 10 million male nerds give a shit what some lesbian thinks ?
Look I realize you 're fucking angry because god gave us the parts you wanted but do n't take it out on us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you think 10 million male nerds give a shit what some lesbian thinks?
Look I realize you're fucking angry because god gave us the parts you wanted but don't take it out on us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711424</id>
	<title>Seriously?</title>
	<author>TyIzaeL</author>
	<datestamp>1263047340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did I just see a link to Encyclopedia Dramatica on the Slashdot front page?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did I just see a link to Encyclopedia Dramatica on the Slashdot front page ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did I just see a link to Encyclopedia Dramatica on the Slashdot front page?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712426</id>
	<title>very real-life these thing</title>
	<author>stimpleton</author>
	<datestamp>1263056700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Roxxxy, though, was rather unsexily posed on a couch, not moving a bit</i>
<br> <br>*casts eye to wife in next room, then back to computer screen.
<br> <br>Wow, they *are* life like!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Roxxxy , though , was rather unsexily posed on a couch , not moving a bit * casts eye to wife in next room , then back to computer screen .
Wow , they * are * life like !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Roxxxy, though, was rather unsexily posed on a couch, not moving a bit
 *casts eye to wife in next room, then back to computer screen.
Wow, they *are* life like!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30784972</id>
	<title>Re:I think there might be a reason for it</title>
	<author>Fumus</author>
	<datestamp>1263554940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Men are already obsolete. They can use a vibrator for penetration, spermbank for babies, and a dog for sleeping on the couch. And yet, women still want men. Desperate enough that many put up with abuse just to have one.
</p></div><p>Some skip the vibrator and prefer to use the dog instead<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Women are not yet obsolete. There is nothing as soft as a woman, we can't have babies, and a cat is to affectionate and emotionally reliable.
</p></div><p>A cat is fine too..</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Men are already obsolete .
They can use a vibrator for penetration , spermbank for babies , and a dog for sleeping on the couch .
And yet , women still want men .
Desperate enough that many put up with abuse just to have one .
Some skip the vibrator and prefer to use the dog instead : pWomen are not yet obsolete .
There is nothing as soft as a woman , we ca n't have babies , and a cat is to affectionate and emotionally reliable .
A cat is fine too. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Men are already obsolete.
They can use a vibrator for penetration, spermbank for babies, and a dog for sleeping on the couch.
And yet, women still want men.
Desperate enough that many put up with abuse just to have one.
Some skip the vibrator and prefer to use the dog instead :pWomen are not yet obsolete.
There is nothing as soft as a woman, we can't have babies, and a cat is to affectionate and emotionally reliable.
A cat is fine too..
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712810</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263062640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's absolutely no problem with you being a girl. There are many girls on Slashdot, and I haven't ever seen that being a problem.</p><p>The problem with you, <em>personally</em>, is that you're very in-your-face about "I'm a girl, and that MATTERS!". That's what GP means by "constantly mentioning" and "attention whore". There's nothing wrong with identifying your gender when it's relevant to the topic at hand, but, judging by your post history, you're keen on dragging it into <em>every</em> discussion - and, if necessary, you will bend the discussion to do so. And you usually also do it in a deliberately provocative way to cause a gender pissing match. That's what annoys people.</p><p>Of all females posting to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. - which are surprisingly many, actually - and even out of quite a few who have explicitly identified themselves as lesbian or bi - you are the only one being singled out like that. You might consider if that is because of your attitude, rather than your gender or sexual orientation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's absolutely no problem with you being a girl .
There are many girls on Slashdot , and I have n't ever seen that being a problem.The problem with you , personally , is that you 're very in-your-face about " I 'm a girl , and that MATTERS ! " .
That 's what GP means by " constantly mentioning " and " attention whore " .
There 's nothing wrong with identifying your gender when it 's relevant to the topic at hand , but , judging by your post history , you 're keen on dragging it into every discussion - and , if necessary , you will bend the discussion to do so .
And you usually also do it in a deliberately provocative way to cause a gender pissing match .
That 's what annoys people.Of all females posting to / .
- which are surprisingly many , actually - and even out of quite a few who have explicitly identified themselves as lesbian or bi - you are the only one being singled out like that .
You might consider if that is because of your attitude , rather than your gender or sexual orientation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's absolutely no problem with you being a girl.
There are many girls on Slashdot, and I haven't ever seen that being a problem.The problem with you, personally, is that you're very in-your-face about "I'm a girl, and that MATTERS!".
That's what GP means by "constantly mentioning" and "attention whore".
There's nothing wrong with identifying your gender when it's relevant to the topic at hand, but, judging by your post history, you're keen on dragging it into every discussion - and, if necessary, you will bend the discussion to do so.
And you usually also do it in a deliberately provocative way to cause a gender pissing match.
That's what annoys people.Of all females posting to /.
- which are surprisingly many, actually - and even out of quite a few who have explicitly identified themselves as lesbian or bi - you are the only one being singled out like that.
You might consider if that is because of your attitude, rather than your gender or sexual orientation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711818</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>bmecoli</author>
	<datestamp>1263050400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...and the occasional pocket change on <b>lotion</b> and AA batteries.</p></div><p>Wait... LOTION?!  Don't you ladies produce that yourselves?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;/</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and the occasional pocket change on lotion and AA batteries.Wait.. .
LOTION ? ! Do n't you ladies produce that yourselves ?
; /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and the occasional pocket change on lotion and AA batteries.Wait...
LOTION?!  Don't you ladies produce that yourselves?
;/
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30723918</id>
	<title>vibrators soon after electric motors invnted</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1263229140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Both are from the mid-19th century according to the New York Museum of Sex
<br>. Sex applications incorporates new technology quicky.  They were among the first developers of internet credit card transactions and internet video.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Both are from the mid-19th century according to the New York Museum of Sex .
Sex applications incorporates new technology quicky .
They were among the first developers of internet credit card transactions and internet video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Both are from the mid-19th century according to the New York Museum of Sex
.
Sex applications incorporates new technology quicky.
They were among the first developers of internet credit card transactions and internet video.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712164</id>
	<title>It's my sex box,</title>
	<author>geekdom04</author>
	<datestamp>1263053580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and her name is "Sony"!</htmltext>
<tokenext>and her name is " Sony " !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and her name is "Sony"!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712492</id>
	<title>Re:Roxxxy?</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1263057600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was that idea that you could put up boxes on the female toilets, for girls that have to go to the toilet alone. You insert a quarter and it starts talking to you so you don't feel lonely.</p><p>There was that other idea that you could put up boxes on the male toilets. It talks, and you can insert a quarter to make it shut up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was that idea that you could put up boxes on the female toilets , for girls that have to go to the toilet alone .
You insert a quarter and it starts talking to you so you do n't feel lonely.There was that other idea that you could put up boxes on the male toilets .
It talks , and you can insert a quarter to make it shut up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was that idea that you could put up boxes on the female toilets, for girls that have to go to the toilet alone.
You insert a quarter and it starts talking to you so you don't feel lonely.There was that other idea that you could put up boxes on the male toilets.
It talks, and you can insert a quarter to make it shut up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711542</id>
	<title>This is just so one sided!</title>
	<author>starbugs</author>
	<datestamp>1263048240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only thinking about the male side of the population, aren't we???
<br>
I will believe the title once a Sex Robot is developed that can find the <a href="http://www.xkcd.com/685/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">G-spot</a> [xkcd.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only thinking about the male side of the population , are n't we ? ? ?
I will believe the title once a Sex Robot is developed that can find the G-spot [ xkcd.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only thinking about the male side of the population, aren't we???
I will believe the title once a Sex Robot is developed that can find the G-spot [xkcd.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712820</id>
	<title>Re:Ending human trafficking for the forced sex tra</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263062700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Likewise, women owning vibrators went from being something no-one admitted to, to something that second-wave feminism made normative and no big deal (witness many of the comments about vibrators already in this thread, most of which aren't from 'anonymous cowards').</p></div><p>As a non-woman, I wish they'd go back to not talking about it.  Look, I get it: you don't want to have sex with me.  You don't have to revel in it so much when I'm around.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Likewise , women owning vibrators went from being something no-one admitted to , to something that second-wave feminism made normative and no big deal ( witness many of the comments about vibrators already in this thread , most of which are n't from 'anonymous cowards ' ) .As a non-woman , I wish they 'd go back to not talking about it .
Look , I get it : you do n't want to have sex with me .
You do n't have to revel in it so much when I 'm around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Likewise, women owning vibrators went from being something no-one admitted to, to something that second-wave feminism made normative and no big deal (witness many of the comments about vibrators already in this thread, most of which aren't from 'anonymous cowards').As a non-woman, I wish they'd go back to not talking about it.
Look, I get it: you don't want to have sex with me.
You don't have to revel in it so much when I'm around.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712744</id>
	<title>just a website with dummy forms</title>
	<author>purpleraison</author>
	<datestamp>1263061680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>not much more to say really. I could have uploaded this exact site in 2 minutes with identical functionality.</p><p>Just a scam, nothing more.</p><p>With that said... when sex robots DO become available, I am soooooooooo getting one to replace my stupid wife.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>not much more to say really .
I could have uploaded this exact site in 2 minutes with identical functionality.Just a scam , nothing more.With that said... when sex robots DO become available , I am soooooooooo getting one to replace my stupid wife .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not much more to say really.
I could have uploaded this exact site in 2 minutes with identical functionality.Just a scam, nothing more.With that said... when sex robots DO become available, I am soooooooooo getting one to replace my stupid wife.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712930</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Alsee</author>
	<datestamp>1263064800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>just want the same respect you'd give any man on this forum.</i></p><p>This is the internet. Any sentence not containing the word gayfagdouchewad is about the epitome of respect, regardless of your gender.</p><p>-</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>just want the same respect you 'd give any man on this forum.This is the internet .
Any sentence not containing the word gayfagdouchewad is about the epitome of respect , regardless of your gender.-</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just want the same respect you'd give any man on this forum.This is the internet.
Any sentence not containing the word gayfagdouchewad is about the epitome of respect, regardless of your gender.-</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713710</id>
	<title>Re:But does she....</title>
	<author>GeneralEmergency</author>
	<datestamp>1263123540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I can just imagine what would happen if Microsoft had written the software."</p><p>Certainly, feeling you have just been f*cked by Microsoft is not a new sensation!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I can just imagine what would happen if Microsoft had written the software .
" Certainly , feeling you have just been f * cked by Microsoft is not a new sensation !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I can just imagine what would happen if Microsoft had written the software.
"Certainly, feeling you have just been f*cked by Microsoft is not a new sensation!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712174</id>
	<title>Reminder to Mr. Universe...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263053640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do not in her presence mention where you are fleeing...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do not in her presence mention where you are fleeing.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do not in her presence mention where you are fleeing...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711880</id>
	<title>Interesting...</title>
	<author>Bentov</author>
	<datestamp>1263050880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now working out the kinks of the 1.0 version has new, albeit, kinda of freaky connotation to it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now working out the kinks of the 1.0 version has new , albeit , kinda of freaky connotation to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now working out the kinks of the 1.0 version has new, albeit, kinda of freaky connotation to it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712768</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263061980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Well pardon me for taking pride in my gender.</i> </p><p>You take pride in your gender (grammatical concept)? How about taking pride in your sex (physical concept)?</p><p>Hah -- captcha = repress</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well pardon me for taking pride in my gender .
You take pride in your gender ( grammatical concept ) ?
How about taking pride in your sex ( physical concept ) ? Hah -- captcha = repress</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well pardon me for taking pride in my gender.
You take pride in your gender (grammatical concept)?
How about taking pride in your sex (physical concept)?Hah -- captcha = repress</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711848</id>
	<title>Re:Ask and ye shall receive...</title>
	<author>adamchou</author>
	<datestamp>1263050640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the dude in that video was kinda weird... he was talking about wife/girl friend swapping? wtf is that? did they build a swinging robot?</htmltext>
<tokenext>the dude in that video was kinda weird... he was talking about wife/girl friend swapping ?
wtf is that ?
did they build a swinging robot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the dude in that video was kinda weird... he was talking about wife/girl friend swapping?
wtf is that?
did they build a swinging robot?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30785884</id>
	<title>Re:Wait for rev 2</title>
	<author>Gaffod</author>
	<datestamp>1263560220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'll wait until I can get the rev 2.1 non-English speaking version, with the culinary-skills upgrade.</p></div><p>You know, call me silly, but something about a combined sexbot and food processor just doesn't sound right. I mean, I know right? What could possibly go wrong? But...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll wait until I can get the rev 2.1 non-English speaking version , with the culinary-skills upgrade.You know , call me silly , but something about a combined sexbot and food processor just does n't sound right .
I mean , I know right ?
What could possibly go wrong ?
But.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll wait until I can get the rev 2.1 non-English speaking version, with the culinary-skills upgrade.You know, call me silly, but something about a combined sexbot and food processor just doesn't sound right.
I mean, I know right?
What could possibly go wrong?
But...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30737244</id>
	<title>To all "wannabe writing critic trolls"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263312240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><div class="quote"><p><b>"I know you spent lots of time writing that, but it doesn't make any sense."</b> - by cheftw (996831) on Sunday January 10, @10:15AM (#30714572)</p></div><p>First of all, <b>you are OFF TOPIC... your post? It's not about ROBOTICS</b> (mine was). Secondly, as to your "attempts @ being writing critics" (who have no PHD in English, nor anything evidencing you are GREAT writers)? Learn to read (or take your ADD/ADHD meds, or dyslexia therapies, etc. et al)... please!</p><p>ALSO?</p><p>LOL, <b>to all writing critic trolls: You mean like here -&gt; </b> <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1505462&amp;cid=30729986" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1505462&amp;cid=30729986</a> [slashdot.org] <b>where this same "writers critic" tried to tell me "HOW TO WRITE" or that my "WRITING SUCKS", &amp; he was caught starting a sentence with a conjunction</b> (the word AND)<b>?</b></p><p>Give us a break, trolls... from now on, as far as writing is concerned? I'll just toss THAT right back into your faces, lol!</p><p>LMAO - "too, Too, TOO EASY!"</p><p>APK</p><p>P.S.=&gt; And, of course, this is the 100++:1 ratio of upward mods I have as well that tend to show QUITE otherwise (&amp; prove that your "see jane run" replies, complete with prose that rivals T.S. Elliot (not), just cannot READ (please - do your dyslexia therapies, or take your ADD/ADHD meds, won't you? You're NOT everybody either (and nobody pleases everyone, especially OFF TOPIC TROLLS like yourself who *THINK* they are "writing critics" (to that, lmao, see the URL above)):</p><p>Clearly? Per the upwards mods I have below as well (not just this "writing critic" &amp; his AC replies hounding me or trying to (only making me LAUGH hugely @ this point)) tend to show QUITE otherwise:</p><p>----</p><p><b>+5 'modded up' posts by "yours truly":</b></p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1139485&amp;cid=26975021" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1139485&amp;cid=26975021</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1139485&amp;cid=26974507" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1139485&amp;cid=26974507</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170545&amp;cid=14210206" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170545&amp;cid=14210206</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=175774&amp;cid=14610147" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=175774&amp;cid=14610147</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>----</p><p><b>+4 'modded up' posts by "yours truly":</b></p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=161862&amp;cid=13531817" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=161862&amp;cid=13531817</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=167071&amp;cid=13931198" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=167071&amp;cid=13931198</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1290967&amp;cid=28571315" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1290967&amp;cid=28571315</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1461288&amp;cid=30273506" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1461288&amp;cid=30273506</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>----</p><p><b>+3 'modded up' posts by "yours truly":</b></p><p><a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=155172&amp;cid=13007974" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=155172&amp;cid=13007974</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=166850&amp;cid=13914137" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=166850&amp;cid=13914137</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=175857&amp;cid=14615222" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=175857&amp;cid=14615222</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=273931&amp;threshold=1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=20291847" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=273931&amp;threshold=1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=20291847</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1021873&amp;cid=25681261" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1021873&amp;cid=25681261</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>----</p><p><b>+2 'modded up' posts by "yours truly":</b></p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=158231&amp;cid=13257227" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=158231&amp;cid=13257227</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1361585&amp;cid=29360367" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1361585&amp;cid=29360367</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=158310&amp;cid=13263898" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=158310&amp;cid=13263898</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1361585&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=29358507" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1361585&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=29358507</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=158231&amp;cid=13257227" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=158231&amp;cid=13257227</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=290711&amp;cid=20506147" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=290711&amp;cid=20506147</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=245971&amp;cid=19760473" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=245971&amp;cid=19760473</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=416702&amp;cid=22026982" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=416702&amp;cid=22026982</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=174759&amp;cid=14538593" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=174759&amp;cid=14538593</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=233779&amp;cid=19020329" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=233779&amp;cid=19020329</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=970939&amp;cid=25093275" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=970939&amp;cid=25093275</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=978035&amp;cid=25176955" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=978035&amp;cid=25176955</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=978035&amp;cid=25176841" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=978035&amp;cid=25176841</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1001489&amp;cid=25441395" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1001489&amp;cid=25441395</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1010923&amp;cid=25549351" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1010923&amp;cid=25549351</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1021733&amp;cid=25675515" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1021733&amp;cid=25675515</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1135717&amp;cid=26941781" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1135717&amp;cid=26941781</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1143349&amp;cid=27012231" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1143349&amp;cid=27012231</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1143349&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;pid=27012231" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1143349&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;pid=27012231</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1162247&amp;cid=27211247" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1162247&amp;cid=27211247</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=978035&amp;cid=25176841" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=978035&amp;cid=25176841</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1309763&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;pid=28768721" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1309763&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;pid=28768721</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1218837&amp;cid=27787281" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1218837&amp;cid=27787281</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1497268&amp;cid=30649722" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1497268&amp;cid=30649722</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1490078&amp;cid=30555632" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1490078&amp;cid=30555632</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>----</p><p><b>+1 'modded up' posts by "yours truly":</b></p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1314993&amp;cid=28827429" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1314993&amp;cid=28827429</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1461288&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=30272074" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1461288&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=30272074</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1255487&amp;cid=28197285" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1255487&amp;cid=28197285</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1287729&amp;cid=28539111" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1287729&amp;cid=28539111</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1504756&amp;cid=30711074" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1504756&amp;cid=30711074</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1244697&amp;cid=28100153" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1244697&amp;cid=28100153</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1273501&amp;cid=28375697" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1273501&amp;cid=28375697</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=154725&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;tid=109&amp;mode=thread&amp;pid=12973723" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=154725&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;tid=109&amp;mode=thread&amp;pid=12973723</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=157615&amp;cid=13208800" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=157615&amp;cid=13208800</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=157321&amp;cid=13190570" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=157321&amp;cid=13190570</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=154868&amp;cid=12988150" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=154868&amp;cid=12988150</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=160244&amp;cid=13414756" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=160244&amp;cid=13414756</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=160290&amp;threshold=1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;tid=109&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=13419053" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=160290&amp;threshold=1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;tid=109&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=13419053</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=161697&amp;cid=13526010" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=161697&amp;cid=13526010</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=162717&amp;cid=13598832" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=162717&amp;cid=13598832</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=165958&amp;cid=13843462" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=165958&amp;cid=13843462</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=166174&amp;cid=13863159" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=166174&amp;cid=13863159</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=164039&amp;cid=13698742" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=164039&amp;cid=13698742</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=168793&amp;cid=14070783" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=168793&amp;cid=14070783</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://books.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=168931&amp;cid=14083927" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://books.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=168931&amp;cid=14083927</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=236367&amp;cid=19291677" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=236367&amp;cid=19291677</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=237091&amp;cid=19362755" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=237091&amp;cid=19362755</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170296&amp;cid=14192885" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170296&amp;cid=14192885</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=154997&amp;cid=12998477" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=154997&amp;cid=12998477</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=235621&amp;cid=19229493" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=235621&amp;cid=19229493</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=174277&amp;cid=14498965" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=174277&amp;cid=14498965</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170983&amp;cid=14242283" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170983&amp;cid=14242283</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=359507&amp;cid=21347933" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=359507&amp;cid=21347933</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=173564&amp;cid=14442403" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=173564&amp;cid=14442403</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=233227&amp;threshold=1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=18969947" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=233227&amp;threshold=1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=18969947</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=447752&amp;cid=22361236" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=447752&amp;cid=22361236</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=173016&amp;cid=14398069" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=173016&amp;cid=14398069</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=162921&amp;cid=13614370" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=162921&amp;cid=13614370</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://books.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=169549&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;tid=109&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=14132540" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://books.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=169549&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;tid=109&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=14132540</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=236547&amp;cid=19310513" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=236547&amp;cid=19310513</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=169309&amp;cid=14112880" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=169309&amp;cid=14112880</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170126&amp;cid=14177851" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170126&amp;cid=14177851</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=236049&amp;cid=19261269" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=236049&amp;cid=19261269</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=367219&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=21434061" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=367219&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=21434061</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170925&amp;cid=14238424" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170925&amp;cid=14238424</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=286721&amp;cid=20452183" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=286721&amp;cid=20452183</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=176229&amp;cid=14641701" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=176229&amp;cid=14641701</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=543962&amp;cid=23310698" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=543962&amp;cid=23310698</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=548476&amp;cid=23353722" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=548476&amp;cid=23353722</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=970939&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;no\_d2=1&amp;cid=25092677" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=970939&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;no\_d2=1&amp;cid=25092677</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1014349&amp;cid=25591403" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1014349&amp;cid=25591403</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1027095&amp;cid=25747655" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1027095&amp;cid=25747655</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1139705&amp;cid=26977225" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1139705&amp;cid=26977225</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1135717&amp;cid=26948399" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1135717&amp;cid=26948399</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1159209&amp;cid=27178753" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1159209&amp;cid=27178753</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1160287&amp;cid=27191729" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1160287&amp;cid=27191729</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1197039&amp;cid=27556999" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1197039&amp;cid=27556999</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1198841&amp;cid=27580299" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1198841&amp;cid=27580299</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1206409&amp;cid=27661983" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1206409&amp;cid=27661983</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=267599&amp;threshold=1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=20203061" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=267599&amp;threshold=1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=20203061</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1328371&amp;cid=28981169" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1328371&amp;cid=28981169</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1300193&amp;cid=28672649" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1300193&amp;cid=28672649</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1319261&amp;cid=28872833" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1319261&amp;cid=28872833</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1339085&amp;cid=29106629" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1339085&amp;cid=29106629</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1339085&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=29106629" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1339085&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=29106629</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1266651&amp;cid=28307523" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1266651&amp;cid=28307523</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1497268&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=30649722" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1497268&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=30649722</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1339085&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=29106629" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1339085&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=29106629</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1461288&amp;cid=30272074" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1461288&amp;cid=30272074</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>----</p><p><b>ALL THOSE "mod ups" FOR ME, an "A/C poster" here, no less? 100++:1 others disagree with you, clearly!</b></p><p><b>(Additionally, it's FAR MORE DIFFICULT for us AC's to even get a +1 upward mod, since<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. "buries" our posts, and many "almighty easily tracked registered users" block us out (probably due to AC trolls like you, no doubt, rather than out of a "wannabe elitist" attitude"))</b></p><p><b>LEARN TO READ (and stop your OFF TOPIC TROLLING, because you are, clearly, OFF TOPIC (there is no "English grammar" section on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. by the way, thus, you're clearly OFF TOPIC) and get your PHD's in English before trying to tell me I can't write well...</b></p><p><b>"too, Too, TOO EASY"... apk</b></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I know you spent lots of time writing that , but it does n't make any sense .
" - by cheftw ( 996831 ) on Sunday January 10 , @ 10 : 15AM ( # 30714572 ) First of all , you are OFF TOPIC... your post ?
It 's not about ROBOTICS ( mine was ) .
Secondly , as to your " attempts @ being writing critics " ( who have no PHD in English , nor anything evidencing you are GREAT writers ) ?
Learn to read ( or take your ADD/ADHD meds , or dyslexia therapies , etc .
et al ) ... please ! ALSO ? LOL , to all writing critic trolls : You mean like here - &gt; http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1505462&amp;cid = 30729986 [ slashdot.org ] where this same " writers critic " tried to tell me " HOW TO WRITE " or that my " WRITING SUCKS " , &amp; he was caught starting a sentence with a conjunction ( the word AND ) ? Give us a break , trolls... from now on , as far as writing is concerned ?
I 'll just toss THAT right back into your faces , lol ! LMAO - " too , Too , TOO EASY !
" APKP.S. = &gt; And , of course , this is the 100 + + : 1 ratio of upward mods I have as well that tend to show QUITE otherwise ( &amp; prove that your " see jane run " replies , complete with prose that rivals T.S .
Elliot ( not ) , just can not READ ( please - do your dyslexia therapies , or take your ADD/ADHD meds , wo n't you ?
You 're NOT everybody either ( and nobody pleases everyone , especially OFF TOPIC TROLLS like yourself who * THINK * they are " writing critics " ( to that , lmao , see the URL above ) ) : Clearly ?
Per the upwards mods I have below as well ( not just this " writing critic " &amp; his AC replies hounding me or trying to ( only making me LAUGH hugely @ this point ) ) tend to show QUITE otherwise : ---- + 5 'modded up ' posts by " yours truly " : http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1139485&amp;cid = 26975021 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1139485&amp;cid = 26974507 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 170545&amp;cid = 14210206 [ slashdot.org ] http : //hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 175774&amp;cid = 14610147 [ slashdot.org ] ---- + 4 'modded up ' posts by " yours truly " : http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 161862&amp;cid = 13531817 [ slashdot.org ] http : //developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 167071&amp;cid = 13931198 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1290967&amp;cid = 28571315 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1461288&amp;cid = 30273506 [ slashdot.org ] ---- + 3 'modded up ' posts by " yours truly " : http : //developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 155172&amp;cid = 13007974 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 166850&amp;cid = 13914137 [ slashdot.org ] http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 175857&amp;cid = 14615222 [ slashdot.org ] http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 273931&amp;threshold = 1&amp;commentsort = 0&amp;mode = thread&amp;cid = 20291847 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1021873&amp;cid = 25681261 [ slashdot.org ] ---- + 2 'modded up ' posts by " yours truly " : http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 158231&amp;cid = 13257227 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1361585&amp;cid = 29360367 [ slashdot.org ] http : //science.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 158310&amp;cid = 13263898 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1361585&amp;threshold = -1&amp;commentsort = 0&amp;mode = thread&amp;cid = 29358507 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 158231&amp;cid = 13257227 [ slashdot.org ] http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 290711&amp;cid = 20506147 [ slashdot.org ] http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 245971&amp;cid = 19760473 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 416702&amp;cid = 22026982 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 174759&amp;cid = 14538593 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 233779&amp;cid = 19020329 [ slashdot.org ] http : //ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 970939&amp;cid = 25093275 [ slashdot.org ] http : //yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 978035&amp;cid = 25176955 [ slashdot.org ] http : //yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 978035&amp;cid = 25176841 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1001489&amp;cid = 25441395 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1010923&amp;cid = 25549351 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1021733&amp;cid = 25675515 [ slashdot.org ] http : //news.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1135717&amp;cid = 26941781 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1143349&amp;cid = 27012231 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1143349&amp;threshold = -1&amp;commentsort = 0&amp;mode = thread&amp;pid = 27012231 [ slashdot.org ] http : //linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1162247&amp;cid = 27211247 [ slashdot.org ] http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 978035&amp;cid = 25176841 [ slashdot.org ] http : //developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1309763&amp;threshold = -1&amp;commentsort = 0&amp;mode = thread&amp;pid = 28768721 [ slashdot.org ] http : //yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1218837&amp;cid = 27787281 [ slashdot.org ] http : //hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1497268&amp;cid = 30649722 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1490078&amp;cid = 30555632 [ slashdot.org ] ---- + 1 'modded up ' posts by " yours truly " : http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1314993&amp;cid = 28827429 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1461288&amp;threshold = -1&amp;commentsort = 0&amp;mode = thread&amp;cid = 30272074 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1255487&amp;cid = 28197285 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1287729&amp;cid = 28539111 [ slashdot.org ] http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1504756&amp;cid = 30711074 [ slashdot.org ] http : //yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1244697&amp;cid = 28100153 [ slashdot.org ] http : //hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1273501&amp;cid = 28375697 [ slashdot.org ] http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 154725&amp;threshold = -1&amp;commentsort = 0&amp;tid = 109&amp;mode = thread&amp;pid = 12973723 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 157615&amp;cid = 13208800 [ slashdot.org ] http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 157321&amp;cid = 13190570 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 154868&amp;cid = 12988150 [ slashdot.org ] http : //linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 160244&amp;cid = 13414756 [ slashdot.org ] http : //linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 160290&amp;threshold = 1&amp;commentsort = 0&amp;tid = 109&amp;mode = thread&amp;cid = 13419053 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 161697&amp;cid = 13526010 [ slashdot.org ] http : //science.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 162717&amp;cid = 13598832 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 165958&amp;cid = 13843462 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 166174&amp;cid = 13863159 [ slashdot.org ] http : //linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 164039&amp;cid = 13698742 [ slashdot.org ] http : //hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 168793&amp;cid = 14070783 [ slashdot.org ] http : //books.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 168931&amp;cid = 14083927 [ slashdot.org ] http : //linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 236367&amp;cid = 19291677 [ slashdot.org ] http : //yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 237091&amp;cid = 19362755 [ slashdot.org ] http : //linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 170296&amp;cid = 14192885 [ slashdot.org ] http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 154997&amp;cid = 12998477 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 235621&amp;cid = 19229493 [ slashdot.org ] http : //linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 174277&amp;cid = 14498965 [ slashdot.org ] http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 170983&amp;cid = 14242283 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 359507&amp;cid = 21347933 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 173564&amp;cid = 14442403 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 233227&amp;threshold = 1&amp;commentsort = 0&amp;mode = thread&amp;cid = 18969947 [ slashdot.org ] http : //ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 447752&amp;cid = 22361236 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 173016&amp;cid = 14398069 [ slashdot.org ] http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 162921&amp;cid = 13614370 [ slashdot.org ] http : //books.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 169549&amp;threshold = -1&amp;commentsort = 0&amp;tid = 109&amp;mode = thread&amp;cid = 14132540 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 236547&amp;cid = 19310513 [ slashdot.org ] http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 169309&amp;cid = 14112880 [ slashdot.org ] http : //linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 170126&amp;cid = 14177851 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 236049&amp;cid = 19261269 [ slashdot.org ] http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 367219&amp;threshold = -1&amp;commentsort = 0&amp;mode = thread&amp;cid = 21434061 [ slashdot.org ] http : //developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 170925&amp;cid = 14238424 [ slashdot.org ] http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 286721&amp;cid = 20452183 [ slashdot.org ] http : //developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 176229&amp;cid = 14641701 [ slashdot.org ] http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 543962&amp;cid = 23310698 [ slashdot.org ] http : //news.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 548476&amp;cid = 23353722 [ slashdot.org ] http : //ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 970939&amp;threshold = -1&amp;commentsort = 0&amp;mode = thread&amp;no \ _d2 = 1&amp;cid = 25092677 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1014349&amp;cid = 25591403 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1027095&amp;cid = 25747655 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1139705&amp;cid = 26977225 [ slashdot.org ] http : //news.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1135717&amp;cid = 26948399 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1159209&amp;cid = 27178753 [ slashdot.org ] http : //hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1160287&amp;cid = 27191729 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1197039&amp;cid = 27556999 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1198841&amp;cid = 27580299 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1206409&amp;cid = 27661983 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 267599&amp;threshold = 1&amp;commentsort = 0&amp;mode = thread&amp;cid = 20203061 [ slashdot.org ] http : //ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1328371&amp;cid = 28981169 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1300193&amp;cid = 28672649 [ slashdot.org ] http : //hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1319261&amp;cid = 28872833 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1339085&amp;cid = 29106629 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1339085&amp;threshold = -1&amp;commentsort = 0&amp;mode = thread&amp;cid = 29106629 [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1266651&amp;cid = 28307523 [ slashdot.org ] http : //hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1497268&amp;threshold = -1&amp;commentsort = 0&amp;mode = thread&amp;cid = 30649722 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1339085&amp;threshold = -1&amp;commentsort = 0&amp;mode = thread&amp;cid = 29106629 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1461288&amp;cid = 30272074 [ slashdot.org ] ----ALL THOSE " mod ups " FOR ME , an " A/C poster " here , no less ?
100 + + : 1 others disagree with you , clearly !
( Additionally , it 's FAR MORE DIFFICULT for us AC 's to even get a + 1 upward mod , since / .
" buries " our posts , and many " almighty easily tracked registered users " block us out ( probably due to AC trolls like you , no doubt , rather than out of a " wannabe elitist " attitude " ) ) LEARN TO READ ( and stop your OFF TOPIC TROLLING , because you are , clearly , OFF TOPIC ( there is no " English grammar " section on / .
by the way , thus , you 're clearly OFF TOPIC ) and get your PHD 's in English before trying to tell me I ca n't write well... " too , Too , TOO EASY " ... apk</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I know you spent lots of time writing that, but it doesn't make any sense.
" - by cheftw (996831) on Sunday January 10, @10:15AM (#30714572)First of all, you are OFF TOPIC... your post?
It's not about ROBOTICS (mine was).
Secondly, as to your "attempts @ being writing critics" (who have no PHD in English, nor anything evidencing you are GREAT writers)?
Learn to read (or take your ADD/ADHD meds, or dyslexia therapies, etc.
et al)... please!ALSO?LOL, to all writing critic trolls: You mean like here -&gt;  http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1505462&amp;cid=30729986 [slashdot.org] where this same "writers critic" tried to tell me "HOW TO WRITE" or that my "WRITING SUCKS", &amp; he was caught starting a sentence with a conjunction (the word AND)?Give us a break, trolls... from now on, as far as writing is concerned?
I'll just toss THAT right back into your faces, lol!LMAO - "too, Too, TOO EASY!
"APKP.S.=&gt; And, of course, this is the 100++:1 ratio of upward mods I have as well that tend to show QUITE otherwise (&amp; prove that your "see jane run" replies, complete with prose that rivals T.S.
Elliot (not), just cannot READ (please - do your dyslexia therapies, or take your ADD/ADHD meds, won't you?
You're NOT everybody either (and nobody pleases everyone, especially OFF TOPIC TROLLS like yourself who *THINK* they are "writing critics" (to that, lmao, see the URL above)):Clearly?
Per the upwards mods I have below as well (not just this "writing critic" &amp; his AC replies hounding me or trying to (only making me LAUGH hugely @ this point)) tend to show QUITE otherwise:----+5 'modded up' posts by "yours truly":http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1139485&amp;cid=26975021 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1139485&amp;cid=26974507 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170545&amp;cid=14210206 [slashdot.org]http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=175774&amp;cid=14610147 [slashdot.org]----+4 'modded up' posts by "yours truly":http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=161862&amp;cid=13531817 [slashdot.org]http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=167071&amp;cid=13931198 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1290967&amp;cid=28571315 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1461288&amp;cid=30273506 [slashdot.org]----+3 'modded up' posts by "yours truly":http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=155172&amp;cid=13007974 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=166850&amp;cid=13914137 [slashdot.org]http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=175857&amp;cid=14615222 [slashdot.org]http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=273931&amp;threshold=1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=20291847 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1021873&amp;cid=25681261 [slashdot.org]----+2 'modded up' posts by "yours truly":http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=158231&amp;cid=13257227 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1361585&amp;cid=29360367 [slashdot.org]http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=158310&amp;cid=13263898 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1361585&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=29358507 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=158231&amp;cid=13257227 [slashdot.org]http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=290711&amp;cid=20506147 [slashdot.org]http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=245971&amp;cid=19760473 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=416702&amp;cid=22026982 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=174759&amp;cid=14538593 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=233779&amp;cid=19020329 [slashdot.org]http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=970939&amp;cid=25093275 [slashdot.org]http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=978035&amp;cid=25176955 [slashdot.org]http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=978035&amp;cid=25176841 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1001489&amp;cid=25441395 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1010923&amp;cid=25549351 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1021733&amp;cid=25675515 [slashdot.org]http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1135717&amp;cid=26941781 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1143349&amp;cid=27012231 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1143349&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;pid=27012231 [slashdot.org]http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1162247&amp;cid=27211247 [slashdot.org]http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=978035&amp;cid=25176841 [slashdot.org]http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1309763&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;pid=28768721 [slashdot.org]http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1218837&amp;cid=27787281 [slashdot.org]http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1497268&amp;cid=30649722 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1490078&amp;cid=30555632 [slashdot.org]----+1 'modded up' posts by "yours truly":http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1314993&amp;cid=28827429 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1461288&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=30272074 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1255487&amp;cid=28197285 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1287729&amp;cid=28539111 [slashdot.org]http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1504756&amp;cid=30711074 [slashdot.org]http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1244697&amp;cid=28100153 [slashdot.org]http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1273501&amp;cid=28375697 [slashdot.org]http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=154725&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;tid=109&amp;mode=thread&amp;pid=12973723 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=157615&amp;cid=13208800 [slashdot.org]http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=157321&amp;cid=13190570 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=154868&amp;cid=12988150 [slashdot.org]http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=160244&amp;cid=13414756 [slashdot.org]http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=160290&amp;threshold=1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;tid=109&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=13419053 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=161697&amp;cid=13526010 [slashdot.org]http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=162717&amp;cid=13598832 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=165958&amp;cid=13843462 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=166174&amp;cid=13863159 [slashdot.org]http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=164039&amp;cid=13698742 [slashdot.org]http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=168793&amp;cid=14070783 [slashdot.org]http://books.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=168931&amp;cid=14083927 [slashdot.org]http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=236367&amp;cid=19291677 [slashdot.org]http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=237091&amp;cid=19362755 [slashdot.org]http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170296&amp;cid=14192885 [slashdot.org]http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=154997&amp;cid=12998477 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=235621&amp;cid=19229493 [slashdot.org]http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=174277&amp;cid=14498965 [slashdot.org]http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170983&amp;cid=14242283 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=359507&amp;cid=21347933 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=173564&amp;cid=14442403 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=233227&amp;threshold=1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=18969947 [slashdot.org]http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=447752&amp;cid=22361236 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=173016&amp;cid=14398069 [slashdot.org]http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=162921&amp;cid=13614370 [slashdot.org]http://books.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=169549&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;tid=109&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=14132540 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=236547&amp;cid=19310513 [slashdot.org]http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=169309&amp;cid=14112880 [slashdot.org]http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170126&amp;cid=14177851 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=236049&amp;cid=19261269 [slashdot.org]http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=367219&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=21434061 [slashdot.org]http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170925&amp;cid=14238424 [slashdot.org]http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=286721&amp;cid=20452183 [slashdot.org]http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=176229&amp;cid=14641701 [slashdot.org]http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=543962&amp;cid=23310698 [slashdot.org]http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=548476&amp;cid=23353722 [slashdot.org]http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=970939&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;no\_d2=1&amp;cid=25092677 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1014349&amp;cid=25591403 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1027095&amp;cid=25747655 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1139705&amp;cid=26977225 [slashdot.org]http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1135717&amp;cid=26948399 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1159209&amp;cid=27178753 [slashdot.org]http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1160287&amp;cid=27191729 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1197039&amp;cid=27556999 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1198841&amp;cid=27580299 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1206409&amp;cid=27661983 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=267599&amp;threshold=1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=20203061 [slashdot.org]http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1328371&amp;cid=28981169 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1300193&amp;cid=28672649 [slashdot.org]http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1319261&amp;cid=28872833 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1339085&amp;cid=29106629 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1339085&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=29106629 [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1266651&amp;cid=28307523 [slashdot.org]http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1497268&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=30649722 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1339085&amp;threshold=-1&amp;commentsort=0&amp;mode=thread&amp;cid=29106629 [slashdot.org]http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1461288&amp;cid=30272074 [slashdot.org]----ALL THOSE "mod ups" FOR ME, an "A/C poster" here, no less?
100++:1 others disagree with you, clearly!
(Additionally, it's FAR MORE DIFFICULT for us AC's to even get a +1 upward mod, since /.
"buries" our posts, and many "almighty easily tracked registered users" block us out (probably due to AC trolls like you, no doubt, rather than out of a "wannabe elitist" attitude"))LEARN TO READ (and stop your OFF TOPIC TROLLING, because you are, clearly, OFF TOPIC (there is no "English grammar" section on /.
by the way, thus, you're clearly OFF TOPIC) and get your PHD's in English before trying to tell me I can't write well..."too, Too, TOO EASY"... apk
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30785800</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Gaffod</author>
	<datestamp>1263559680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's why WW3 will be fought: The Boxxy sex-bot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's why WW3 will be fought : The Boxxy sex-bot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's why WW3 will be fought: The Boxxy sex-bot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712368</id>
	<title>24x7 Support</title>
	<author>AngryElmo</author>
	<datestamp>1263055980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hello.  Help desk?  My Roxxxy is fucked.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hello .
Help desk ?
My Roxxxy is fucked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hello.
Help desk?
My Roxxxy is fucked.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711518</id>
	<title>The unexpected consequences</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263048060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More plastic landfill?</p><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVQJna0XBF8</p><p>No, they don't deserve that. I guess planned obsolescence really is inhuman.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More plastic landfill ? http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = ZVQJna0XBF8No , they do n't deserve that .
I guess planned obsolescence really is inhuman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More plastic landfill?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVQJna0XBF8No, they don't deserve that.
I guess planned obsolescence really is inhuman.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30715930</id>
	<title>Re:Ending human trafficking for the forced sex tra</title>
	<author>5pp000</author>
	<datestamp>1263153060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting point.

</p><p>Here's another thought: China is about to find itself with a severe shortage of young women, now that it has become possible to choose the sex of a baby, and many are choosing boys.  I bet sex robots will be a massive business there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting point .
Here 's another thought : China is about to find itself with a severe shortage of young women , now that it has become possible to choose the sex of a baby , and many are choosing boys .
I bet sex robots will be a massive business there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting point.
Here's another thought: China is about to find itself with a severe shortage of young women, now that it has become possible to choose the sex of a baby, and many are choosing boys.
I bet sex robots will be a massive business there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712570</id>
	<title>Ok the ONLY time I will ever post this...</title>
	<author>quakemeister</author>
	<datestamp>1263058860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I, for one, wholeheartedly welcome our sex robot overlords...</p><p>(I gotta believe someone else posted this already but didn't see it)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , wholeheartedly welcome our sex robot overlords... ( I got ta believe someone else posted this already but did n't see it )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, wholeheartedly welcome our sex robot overlords...(I gotta believe someone else posted this already but didn't see it)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711504</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>DamienNightbane</author>
	<datestamp>1263047940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know the rules. No girls on the internet, pics or it didn't happen, tits or GTFO, et cetera.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know the rules .
No girls on the internet , pics or it did n't happen , tits or GTFO , et cetera .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know the rules.
No girls on the internet, pics or it didn't happen, tits or GTFO, et cetera.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713504</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263119100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you an alt of assholeintraining -- because each of you remind me of the other.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you an alt of assholeintraining -- because each of you remind me of the other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you an alt of assholeintraining -- because each of you remind me of the other.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712878</id>
	<title>Re:Teleoperation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263063720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm glad you mentioned ssh!  I'd hate to imagine the consequences of a "man-in-the-middle attack" in the scenario you've just given!</p><p>For some reason this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyIqTCrux\_o" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">superman joke</a> [youtube.com] (audio is NSFW) came to mind...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad you mentioned ssh !
I 'd hate to imagine the consequences of a " man-in-the-middle attack " in the scenario you 've just given ! For some reason this superman joke [ youtube.com ] ( audio is NSFW ) came to mind.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad you mentioned ssh!
I'd hate to imagine the consequences of a "man-in-the-middle attack" in the scenario you've just given!For some reason this superman joke [youtube.com] (audio is NSFW) came to mind...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712454</id>
	<title>Re:Porn drives tech, eh?</title>
	<author>timmarhy</author>
	<datestamp>1263057120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I counter that porn is why we have web cams, streaming internet video, broadband and a ton of other internet related tech.<p>
your move.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I counter that porn is why we have web cams , streaming internet video , broadband and a ton of other internet related tech .
your move .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I counter that porn is why we have web cams, streaming internet video, broadband and a ton of other internet related tech.
your move.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714478</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263138840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>All the gay bars I went to with a female, we were both more then welcome. The moment I said I was not gay, there was no problem.<br>All the lesbian bars I went to with a female, people either asked me to leave or treated me like I was raping women on the bar (if I was allowed to enter in the first place)</p></div><p>That's because men, generally speaking, are seen as predators, and women as prey. I'm not saying this is true; just that many (most?) people see it that way.</p><p>Imagine a bunch of foxes declare they have no interest in hens. They meet up, and a hen walks in there as well. No problem - the hen obviously doesn't prey on foxes, and the foxes have already declared they're not interested in the hen, either.</p><p>Now imagine some hens declare they're not interested in foxes. They meet up, and a fox walks in as well. The difference is that even though the hens still have no interest in the fox, the fox, as a predator, has an interest in the hens.</p><p>This is how these things are seen, generally speaking. It's unfair, of course, and it IS sexist, but it's not a fault of the "lesbian community" as much as of society as a whole, because the whole "men are predators, women are prey" thing is a very general meme permeating all of society.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All the gay bars I went to with a female , we were both more then welcome .
The moment I said I was not gay , there was no problem.All the lesbian bars I went to with a female , people either asked me to leave or treated me like I was raping women on the bar ( if I was allowed to enter in the first place ) That 's because men , generally speaking , are seen as predators , and women as prey .
I 'm not saying this is true ; just that many ( most ?
) people see it that way.Imagine a bunch of foxes declare they have no interest in hens .
They meet up , and a hen walks in there as well .
No problem - the hen obviously does n't prey on foxes , and the foxes have already declared they 're not interested in the hen , either.Now imagine some hens declare they 're not interested in foxes .
They meet up , and a fox walks in as well .
The difference is that even though the hens still have no interest in the fox , the fox , as a predator , has an interest in the hens.This is how these things are seen , generally speaking .
It 's unfair , of course , and it IS sexist , but it 's not a fault of the " lesbian community " as much as of society as a whole , because the whole " men are predators , women are prey " thing is a very general meme permeating all of society .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the gay bars I went to with a female, we were both more then welcome.
The moment I said I was not gay, there was no problem.All the lesbian bars I went to with a female, people either asked me to leave or treated me like I was raping women on the bar (if I was allowed to enter in the first place)That's because men, generally speaking, are seen as predators, and women as prey.
I'm not saying this is true; just that many (most?
) people see it that way.Imagine a bunch of foxes declare they have no interest in hens.
They meet up, and a hen walks in there as well.
No problem - the hen obviously doesn't prey on foxes, and the foxes have already declared they're not interested in the hen, either.Now imagine some hens declare they're not interested in foxes.
They meet up, and a fox walks in as well.
The difference is that even though the hens still have no interest in the fox, the fox, as a predator, has an interest in the hens.This is how these things are seen, generally speaking.
It's unfair, of course, and it IS sexist, but it's not a fault of the "lesbian community" as much as of society as a whole, because the whole "men are predators, women are prey" thing is a very general meme permeating all of society.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712030</id>
	<title>Re:But does she....</title>
	<author>toonces33</author>
	<datestamp>1263052020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can just imagine what would happen if Microsoft had written the software.  You would have something like the office assistant come up and give you "helpful" hints.   Then the robot's face would turn blue and you would need to reboot it.</p><p>Plus the robots would become easily infected with viruses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can just imagine what would happen if Microsoft had written the software .
You would have something like the office assistant come up and give you " helpful " hints .
Then the robot 's face would turn blue and you would need to reboot it.Plus the robots would become easily infected with viruses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can just imagine what would happen if Microsoft had written the software.
You would have something like the office assistant come up and give you "helpful" hints.
Then the robot's face would turn blue and you would need to reboot it.Plus the robots would become easily infected with viruses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714474</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>X0563511</author>
	<datestamp>1263138780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just what is (R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) supposed to signify?</p><p>Is this some kind of botnet command channel cleverly disguised as commercial spam?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just what is ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) supposed to signify ? Is this some kind of botnet command channel cleverly disguised as commercial spam ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just what is (R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) supposed to signify?Is this some kind of botnet command channel cleverly disguised as commercial spam?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712058</id>
	<title>$9000 ???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263052380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You could hire a lot of porn actresses to make movies with you for your "business" for $9000.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could hire a lot of porn actresses to make movies with you for your " business " for $ 9000 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could hire a lot of porn actresses to make movies with you for your "business" for $9000.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711570</id>
	<title>My LaTeX Companion</title>
	<author>Charles Dodgeson</author>
	<datestamp>1263048540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As I true geek, I'm sticking with my <a href="http://www.informit.com/store/product.aspx?isbn=0201362996" title="informit.com">LaTeX Companion</a> [informit.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>As I true geek , I 'm sticking with my LaTeX Companion [ informit.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I true geek, I'm sticking with my LaTeX Companion [informit.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714542</id>
	<title>Intelligence?</title>
	<author>desmogod</author>
	<datestamp>1263139680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In what is billed as a world first, a life-size robotic girlfriend complete with artificial <b>intelligence</b> and flesh-like synthetic skin</p></div><p>Can we send it in for a full refund?
Or will they issue a patch to correct this flaw?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In what is billed as a world first , a life-size robotic girlfriend complete with artificial intelligence and flesh-like synthetic skinCan we send it in for a full refund ?
Or will they issue a patch to correct this flaw ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In what is billed as a world first, a life-size robotic girlfriend complete with artificial intelligence and flesh-like synthetic skinCan we send it in for a full refund?
Or will they issue a patch to correct this flaw?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713854</id>
	<title>Re:But does she....</title>
	<author>Snotboble\_</author>
	<datestamp>1263127080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, but given the chance, she could make a run on Linus<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but given the chance , she could make a run on Linus : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but given the chance, she could make a run on Linus :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711614</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263048900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> It feels good to be a girl right now.</p></div><p>
Oh!  Sorry!  We can come back a little later if you're still... indisposed.  We... uh... heard a strange buzzing noise and thought it might have been a transformer going out or something...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It feels good to be a girl right now .
Oh ! Sorry !
We can come back a little later if you 're still... indisposed. We... uh... heard a strange buzzing noise and thought it might have been a transformer going out or something.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It feels good to be a girl right now.
Oh!  Sorry!
We can come back a little later if you're still... indisposed.  We... uh... heard a strange buzzing noise and thought it might have been a transformer going out or something...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714062</id>
	<title>Re:But does she....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263131880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly like the real thing!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly like the real thing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly like the real thing!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712040</id>
	<title>Porn drives tech, eh?</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1263052080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess that's why we're all watching HD-DVD now.</p><p>Funny how the only people I ever hear say that are into porn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess that 's why we 're all watching HD-DVD now.Funny how the only people I ever hear say that are into porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess that's why we're all watching HD-DVD now.Funny how the only people I ever hear say that are into porn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712938</id>
	<title>Re:Career move</title>
	<author>ciryon</author>
	<datestamp>1263064920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Their <a href="http://truecompanion.com/careers.html" title="truecompanion.com">career page</a> [truecompanion.com] acutally says:</p><p>"We are a "customer-centric" organization looking for people that want to <i>grow</i>..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Their career page [ truecompanion.com ] acutally says : " We are a " customer-centric " organization looking for people that want to grow... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their career page [truecompanion.com] acutally says:"We are a "customer-centric" organization looking for people that want to grow..."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713922</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>wgoodman</author>
	<datestamp>1263128880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They killed me, Mal. With a sword. How weird is that?....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They killed me , Mal .
With a sword .
How weird is that ? ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They killed me, Mal.
With a sword.
How weird is that?....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711472</id>
	<title>Hmmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263047700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sex robots? OK, you can't fight the future. This part creeped me out though:</p><blockquote><div><p>According to True Companion's Web site, she "can carry on a discussion and expresses her love to you and be your loving friend. She can talk to you, listen to you and feel your touch."</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sex robots ?
OK , you ca n't fight the future .
This part creeped me out though : According to True Companion 's Web site , she " can carry on a discussion and expresses her love to you and be your loving friend .
She can talk to you , listen to you and feel your touch .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sex robots?
OK, you can't fight the future.
This part creeped me out though:According to True Companion's Web site, she "can carry on a discussion and expresses her love to you and be your loving friend.
She can talk to you, listen to you and feel your touch.
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713762</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>G-forze</author>
	<datestamp>1263124980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Meanwhile, a girl might want to spend more than your toy's ticket price on a Symbian.</p></div><p>If your not talking about mobile devices, maybe <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybian" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">this</a> [wikipedia.org] is what you were referring to.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Meanwhile , a girl might want to spend more than your toy 's ticket price on a Symbian.If your not talking about mobile devices , maybe this [ wikipedia.org ] is what you were referring to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meanwhile, a girl might want to spend more than your toy's ticket price on a Symbian.If your not talking about mobile devices, maybe this [wikipedia.org] is what you were referring to.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712620</id>
	<title>Re:But does she....</title>
	<author>LoRdTAW</author>
	<datestamp>1263059700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes. And if you put two or more together you have a cluster fuck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
And if you put two or more together you have a cluster fuck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
And if you put two or more together you have a cluster fuck.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714018</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1263131100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sorry, you are not in the sudoers file.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry , you are not in the sudoers file .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry, you are not in the sudoers file.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711842</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713082</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263066960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tits or GTFO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tits or GTFO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tits or GTFO.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711862</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1263050700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Much like we have had robotic cars for decades.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Much like we have had robotic cars for decades .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Much like we have had robotic cars for decades.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713694</id>
	<title>Re:holy shit</title>
	<author>ultranova</author>
	<datestamp>1263123240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>whoever buys one of those is fucked in the head</p></div> </blockquote><p>Given that the website refuses to show me their products unless I give my contact info first, I suspect that getting fucked is indeed going to result from doing business with them - and not in the good way.</p><p>Besides, we already have <a href="http://www.sybian.com/index.html?set=yes" title="sybian.com">sex robots</a> [sybian.com], they simply aren't human-shaped.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>whoever buys one of those is fucked in the head Given that the website refuses to show me their products unless I give my contact info first , I suspect that getting fucked is indeed going to result from doing business with them - and not in the good way.Besides , we already have sex robots [ sybian.com ] , they simply are n't human-shaped .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>whoever buys one of those is fucked in the head Given that the website refuses to show me their products unless I give my contact info first, I suspect that getting fucked is indeed going to result from doing business with them - and not in the good way.Besides, we already have sex robots [sybian.com], they simply aren't human-shaped.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712936</id>
	<title>Re:Teleoperation</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1263064860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, start with a less expansive idea.</p><p>Make a pressure, temperature and moisture sensitive skin for a dildo, so you it can record exactly how it is being handled.</p><p>Make an artificial vagina that can simulate these.</p><p>Hook it up to the internet and have at it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , start with a less expansive idea.Make a pressure , temperature and moisture sensitive skin for a dildo , so you it can record exactly how it is being handled.Make an artificial vagina that can simulate these.Hook it up to the internet and have at it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, start with a less expansive idea.Make a pressure, temperature and moisture sensitive skin for a dildo, so you it can record exactly how it is being handled.Make an artificial vagina that can simulate these.Hook it up to the internet and have at it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711680</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263049260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.etradingitems.com/" title="etradingitems.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.etradingitems.com/</a> [etradingitems.com]
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
UGG BOOT $50
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $16
New era cap $15
Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $25
FREE sHIPPING <a href="http://www.etradingitems.com/" title="etradingitems.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.etradingitems.com/</a> [etradingitems.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.etradingitems.com/ [ etradingitems.com ] Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 UGG BOOT $ 50 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 Jean ( True Religion,ed hardy,coogi ) $ 30 Sunglasses ( Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini ) $ 16 New era cap $ 15 Bikini ( Ed hardy,polo ) $ 25 FREE sHIPPING http : //www.etradingitems.com/ [ etradingitems.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.etradingitems.com/ [etradingitems.com]
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
UGG BOOT $50
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $16
New era cap $15
Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $25
FREE sHIPPING http://www.etradingitems.com/ [etradingitems.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713118</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>X0563511</author>
	<datestamp>1263154080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, for someone who just doesn't give a shit about it all, it's quite humorous to watch these "sexist duels."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , for someone who just does n't give a shit about it all , it 's quite humorous to watch these " sexist duels .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, for someone who just doesn't give a shit about it all, it's quite humorous to watch these "sexist duels.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714572</id>
	<title>Re:holy shit LOL, NO $HEET (personal note here)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263140100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know you spent lots of time writing that, but it doesn't make any sense.</p><p>I'm sorry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know you spent lots of time writing that , but it does n't make any sense.I 'm sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know you spent lots of time writing that, but it doesn't make any sense.I'm sorry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30720922</id>
	<title>Hello!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263203820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any chance of a shag?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any chance of a shag ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any chance of a shag?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712792</id>
	<title>Re:holy shit LOL, NO $HEET (personal note here)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263062400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LMAO... &amp; this? THIS "strikes home" for me, personally... why? OK:</p><p>I have returned to academia recently (after a LONG absence, to go after another degree &amp; to "up my skills"/make them more current (JAVA mainly)).</p><p>While there last semester, &amp; have met a slew of INCREDIBLY talented young folks (2 of which graduated from my former highschool alma mater, albeit 2 decades after I had, who did EXTREMELY well in the USA national highschool robotics competition in fact (Mike &amp; Ken? You KNOW who you are, if you read this)).</p><p>I told Mike C. (last name withheld, because I didn't ask his permission to post this here):</p><p> <b>"Hey, from what I understand, 'fellow alumnus' you did GREAT in the highschool robotics championship. That said, when you make that FIRST "robotic woman"? Remember Me, for 'Quality Control purposes &amp; beta testing'"</b> </p><p>(Because, after all, as we ALL know? QUALITY CONTROL IS VERY IMPORTANT... lmao!)</p><p>LOL!</p><p>"Make love instead of war"? Absolutely!</p><p>(Personally? I'd rather see this happen, than "TERMINATORS"...)</p><p>As an aside note:</p><p>I am INCREDIBLY impressed with today's "future computer scientists" - they are a HELL of a lot stronger/better than even the best I ever met in my first forays into this art &amp; science (spanning from the late 1980's to today actually both academically &amp; professionally), but, I am also impressed with they, as people too...</p><p>Why?</p><p>One told me a VERY strong &amp; humble point of view. He said:</p><p>"Man, you have to understand: WE GREW UP ON THESE MACHINES, you did not... whilst you were in academia, in a way? So were we... &amp; we never stopped &amp; here we are. So, of course, our generation is going to be stronger than yours was, @ the same point of development!"</p><p>Which is WHY I am going to FINALLY realize a goal of mine: Which is to FINALLY move to mgt. roles!</p><p>(I have a B.S. in Business Admin + a CIS concentration &amp; am moving towards finishing off a CSC B.S. too, the A.A.S. part is done already here though)...</p><p>I did that, in addition to spending a GREAT deal of time "in the trenches" as both a coder &amp; network administrator too (gotta know BOTH imo, to lead both types of guys) to guide &amp; lead these talented youngsters, in the VERY NEAR FUTURE for me!</p><p>(&amp; hopefully, BETTER than the mgt. I had (largely/mostly, but not ALL, only "MBA" types who haven't even done the job themselves &amp; "walked a mile in a coder's shoes"))</p><p>See... I personally couldn't see how companies have folks of that "ilk" even got the job as CIO's &amp; such to be honest (which is the "why" of WHY I spent an extra 16++ yrs. as a dev. to learn how those guys operate &amp; to have "walked MORE than a mile in their shoes").</p><p>The money was as good as a coder, especially in the early to late 1990's, so why not? Better myself, as a coder + networker FIRST, so I can make even MORE later, plus, do a better job of it, &amp; have the respect of my subordinates + peers too, AND to make better decisions (without having to depend solely on others, who can mislead OR make mistakes too mind you, &amp; just end up costing more (we've all seen the managers who say "I don't need to know how to do that, I will just hire someone who does" sure, it's not YOUR MONEY AFTER ALL, right, you useless deadweight).</p><p>I just hope it works out is all, &amp; this recession now doesn't turn into the "GREATER DEPRESSION" is all... God willing.</p><p>APK</p><p>P.S.=&gt; Wouldn't surprise me if the young men I mention above actually DO "follow through" &amp; complete such a mission (because it'd make them instant billionaires, overnite, imo @ least)... only 'downside' is? LOL, it'd probably "extinct" the human species (because IF you're a guy that has ANY experience with ladies? You KNOW how "high maintenance" some can be, &amp; the troubles/anguish they can bring, especially IF/WHEN they're truly "hot" (because they can replace you, "just like that", easily)).</p><p>Of course, the same holds true for the ladies</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LMAO... &amp; this ?
THIS " strikes home " for me , personally... why ? OK : I have returned to academia recently ( after a LONG absence , to go after another degree &amp; to " up my skills " /make them more current ( JAVA mainly ) ) .While there last semester , &amp; have met a slew of INCREDIBLY talented young folks ( 2 of which graduated from my former highschool alma mater , albeit 2 decades after I had , who did EXTREMELY well in the USA national highschool robotics competition in fact ( Mike &amp; Ken ?
You KNOW who you are , if you read this ) ) .I told Mike C. ( last name withheld , because I did n't ask his permission to post this here ) : " Hey , from what I understand , 'fellow alumnus ' you did GREAT in the highschool robotics championship .
That said , when you make that FIRST " robotic woman " ?
Remember Me , for 'Quality Control purposes &amp; beta testing ' " ( Because , after all , as we ALL know ?
QUALITY CONTROL IS VERY IMPORTANT.. .
lmao ! ) LOL ! " Make love instead of war " ?
Absolutely ! ( Personally ? I 'd rather see this happen , than " TERMINATORS " ... ) As an aside note : I am INCREDIBLY impressed with today 's " future computer scientists " - they are a HELL of a lot stronger/better than even the best I ever met in my first forays into this art &amp; science ( spanning from the late 1980 's to today actually both academically &amp; professionally ) , but , I am also impressed with they , as people too...Why ? One told me a VERY strong &amp; humble point of view .
He said : " Man , you have to understand : WE GREW UP ON THESE MACHINES , you did not... whilst you were in academia , in a way ?
So were we... &amp; we never stopped &amp; here we are .
So , of course , our generation is going to be stronger than yours was , @ the same point of development !
" Which is WHY I am going to FINALLY realize a goal of mine : Which is to FINALLY move to mgt .
roles ! ( I have a B.S .
in Business Admin + a CIS concentration &amp; am moving towards finishing off a CSC B.S .
too , the A.A.S .
part is done already here though ) ...I did that , in addition to spending a GREAT deal of time " in the trenches " as both a coder &amp; network administrator too ( got ta know BOTH imo , to lead both types of guys ) to guide &amp; lead these talented youngsters , in the VERY NEAR FUTURE for me !
( &amp; hopefully , BETTER than the mgt .
I had ( largely/mostly , but not ALL , only " MBA " types who have n't even done the job themselves &amp; " walked a mile in a coder 's shoes " ) ) See... I personally could n't see how companies have folks of that " ilk " even got the job as CIO 's &amp; such to be honest ( which is the " why " of WHY I spent an extra 16 + + yrs .
as a dev .
to learn how those guys operate &amp; to have " walked MORE than a mile in their shoes " ) .The money was as good as a coder , especially in the early to late 1990 's , so why not ?
Better myself , as a coder + networker FIRST , so I can make even MORE later , plus , do a better job of it , &amp; have the respect of my subordinates + peers too , AND to make better decisions ( without having to depend solely on others , who can mislead OR make mistakes too mind you , &amp; just end up costing more ( we 've all seen the managers who say " I do n't need to know how to do that , I will just hire someone who does " sure , it 's not YOUR MONEY AFTER ALL , right , you useless deadweight ) .I just hope it works out is all , &amp; this recession now does n't turn into the " GREATER DEPRESSION " is all... God willing.APKP.S. = &gt; Would n't surprise me if the young men I mention above actually DO " follow through " &amp; complete such a mission ( because it 'd make them instant billionaires , overnite , imo @ least ) ... only 'downside ' is ?
LOL , it 'd probably " extinct " the human species ( because IF you 're a guy that has ANY experience with ladies ?
You KNOW how " high maintenance " some can be , &amp; the troubles/anguish they can bring , especially IF/WHEN they 're truly " hot " ( because they can replace you , " just like that " , easily ) ) .Of course , the same holds true for the ladies</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LMAO... &amp; this?
THIS "strikes home" for me, personally... why? OK:I have returned to academia recently (after a LONG absence, to go after another degree &amp; to "up my skills"/make them more current (JAVA mainly)).While there last semester, &amp; have met a slew of INCREDIBLY talented young folks (2 of which graduated from my former highschool alma mater, albeit 2 decades after I had, who did EXTREMELY well in the USA national highschool robotics competition in fact (Mike &amp; Ken?
You KNOW who you are, if you read this)).I told Mike C. (last name withheld, because I didn't ask his permission to post this here): "Hey, from what I understand, 'fellow alumnus' you did GREAT in the highschool robotics championship.
That said, when you make that FIRST "robotic woman"?
Remember Me, for 'Quality Control purposes &amp; beta testing'" (Because, after all, as we ALL know?
QUALITY CONTROL IS VERY IMPORTANT...
lmao!)LOL!"Make love instead of war"?
Absolutely!(Personally? I'd rather see this happen, than "TERMINATORS"...)As an aside note:I am INCREDIBLY impressed with today's "future computer scientists" - they are a HELL of a lot stronger/better than even the best I ever met in my first forays into this art &amp; science (spanning from the late 1980's to today actually both academically &amp; professionally), but, I am also impressed with they, as people too...Why?One told me a VERY strong &amp; humble point of view.
He said:"Man, you have to understand: WE GREW UP ON THESE MACHINES, you did not... whilst you were in academia, in a way?
So were we... &amp; we never stopped &amp; here we are.
So, of course, our generation is going to be stronger than yours was, @ the same point of development!
"Which is WHY I am going to FINALLY realize a goal of mine: Which is to FINALLY move to mgt.
roles!(I have a B.S.
in Business Admin + a CIS concentration &amp; am moving towards finishing off a CSC B.S.
too, the A.A.S.
part is done already here though)...I did that, in addition to spending a GREAT deal of time "in the trenches" as both a coder &amp; network administrator too (gotta know BOTH imo, to lead both types of guys) to guide &amp; lead these talented youngsters, in the VERY NEAR FUTURE for me!
(&amp; hopefully, BETTER than the mgt.
I had (largely/mostly, but not ALL, only "MBA" types who haven't even done the job themselves &amp; "walked a mile in a coder's shoes"))See... I personally couldn't see how companies have folks of that "ilk" even got the job as CIO's &amp; such to be honest (which is the "why" of WHY I spent an extra 16++ yrs.
as a dev.
to learn how those guys operate &amp; to have "walked MORE than a mile in their shoes").The money was as good as a coder, especially in the early to late 1990's, so why not?
Better myself, as a coder + networker FIRST, so I can make even MORE later, plus, do a better job of it, &amp; have the respect of my subordinates + peers too, AND to make better decisions (without having to depend solely on others, who can mislead OR make mistakes too mind you, &amp; just end up costing more (we've all seen the managers who say "I don't need to know how to do that, I will just hire someone who does" sure, it's not YOUR MONEY AFTER ALL, right, you useless deadweight).I just hope it works out is all, &amp; this recession now doesn't turn into the "GREATER DEPRESSION" is all... God willing.APKP.S.=&gt; Wouldn't surprise me if the young men I mention above actually DO "follow through" &amp; complete such a mission (because it'd make them instant billionaires, overnite, imo @ least)... only 'downside' is?
LOL, it'd probably "extinct" the human species (because IF you're a guy that has ANY experience with ladies?
You KNOW how "high maintenance" some can be, &amp; the troubles/anguish they can bring, especially IF/WHEN they're truly "hot" (because they can replace you, "just like that", easily)).Of course, the same holds true for the ladies</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334</id>
	<title>We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1263046680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are called vibrators.</p><p>Strangely, widely accepted by one of the sexes, this which is usually thought to be more demanding (on many levels) of partners.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are called vibrators.Strangely , widely accepted by one of the sexes , this which is usually thought to be more demanding ( on many levels ) of partners .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are called vibrators.Strangely, widely accepted by one of the sexes, this which is usually thought to be more demanding (on many levels) of partners.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712668</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Maxo-Texas</author>
	<datestamp>1263060420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love your eyes Roxxy</p><p>roxxy: I love your eyes too, bill.</p><p>You make me hot!</p><p>roxxy: do you like it that i make you hot?</p><p>What's your favorite sex move!?!</p><p>roxxy: What about your own favorite sex move, bill?</p><p>I like pinching your nipples.</p><p>roxxy: Can you elaborate on that, bill?</p><p>I like pinching them and making you squeal!</p><p>roxxy:  Do you wish to like pinching them hard so me, bill?</p><p><a href="http://www-ai.ijs.si/eliza-cgi-bin/eliza\_script" title="www-ai.ijs.si">http://www-ai.ijs.si/eliza-cgi-bin/eliza\_script</a> [www-ai.ijs.si]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love your eyes Roxxyroxxy : I love your eyes too , bill.You make me hot ! roxxy : do you like it that i make you hot ? What 's your favorite sex move ! ?
! roxxy : What about your own favorite sex move , bill ? I like pinching your nipples.roxxy : Can you elaborate on that , bill ? I like pinching them and making you squeal ! roxxy : Do you wish to like pinching them hard so me , bill ? http : //www-ai.ijs.si/eliza-cgi-bin/eliza \ _script [ www-ai.ijs.si ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love your eyes Roxxyroxxy: I love your eyes too, bill.You make me hot!roxxy: do you like it that i make you hot?What's your favorite sex move!?
!roxxy: What about your own favorite sex move, bill?I like pinching your nipples.roxxy: Can you elaborate on that, bill?I like pinching them and making you squeal!roxxy:  Do you wish to like pinching them hard so me, bill?http://www-ai.ijs.si/eliza-cgi-bin/eliza\_script [www-ai.ijs.si]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713452</id>
	<title>Here's an interesting comparison</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1263117900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mr. Garrison from South Park (from Season 9 to 12):<br>
1) Refers to self as "dyke".<br>
2) Likes to constantly remind people he's a woman<br>
3) Gets up in everyone's face at the slightest provocation regarding issues of sex/sexual orientation<br>
4) Something in the name implies a sex-change operation
<br> <br>
girlintraining (in terms of above four characteristics):<br>
1) Check<br>
2) Check<br>
3) Check<br>
4) Checkmate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr. Garrison from South Park ( from Season 9 to 12 ) : 1 ) Refers to self as " dyke " .
2 ) Likes to constantly remind people he 's a woman 3 ) Gets up in everyone 's face at the slightest provocation regarding issues of sex/sexual orientation 4 ) Something in the name implies a sex-change operation girlintraining ( in terms of above four characteristics ) : 1 ) Check 2 ) Check 3 ) Check 4 ) Checkmate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr. Garrison from South Park (from Season 9 to 12):
1) Refers to self as "dyke".
2) Likes to constantly remind people he's a woman
3) Gets up in everyone's face at the slightest provocation regarding issues of sex/sexual orientation
4) Something in the name implies a sex-change operation
 
girlintraining (in terms of above four characteristics):
1) Check
2) Check
3) Check
4) Checkmate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713270</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263157140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What he said was sexist and wrong.  You should take pride in your gender.</p><p>But your "smugness" and all of its implications were a little sexist as well.</p><p>Had you not said "It feels good to be a girl right now", it would have been a perfectly valid statement.  But you did, thus implying that only men would spend so much on something and that women would never bother with things that are so expensive (never mind such things as the sybian).</p><p>You've got a little smudge on you there, kettle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What he said was sexist and wrong .
You should take pride in your gender.But your " smugness " and all of its implications were a little sexist as well.Had you not said " It feels good to be a girl right now " , it would have been a perfectly valid statement .
But you did , thus implying that only men would spend so much on something and that women would never bother with things that are so expensive ( never mind such things as the sybian ) .You 've got a little smudge on you there , kettle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What he said was sexist and wrong.
You should take pride in your gender.But your "smugness" and all of its implications were a little sexist as well.Had you not said "It feels good to be a girl right now", it would have been a perfectly valid statement.
But you did, thus implying that only men would spend so much on something and that women would never bother with things that are so expensive (never mind such things as the sybian).You've got a little smudge on you there, kettle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30785960</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Gaffod</author>
	<datestamp>1263560640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And her sig is an unfunny meme as well!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And her sig is an unfunny meme as well !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And her sig is an unfunny meme as well!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713896</id>
	<title>Now the big question is...</title>
	<author>Hymer</author>
	<datestamp>1263128640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...are you unfaithful when you are fucking with a robot ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...are you unfaithful when you are fucking with a robot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...are you unfaithful when you are fucking with a robot ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712096</id>
	<title>I don't know about you, but I've seen sexier stapl</title>
	<author>Osmosis\_Garett</author>
	<datestamp>1263052800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Call me when the robot sex dolls are standing at the booth, vivaciously encouraging passers-by to come in and give them a try.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Call me when the robot sex dolls are standing at the booth , vivaciously encouraging passers-by to come in and give them a try .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Call me when the robot sex dolls are standing at the booth, vivaciously encouraging passers-by to come in and give them a try.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30733096</id>
	<title>Because nothing is as sexy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263229080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a whorish-looking quadriplegic with the personality of Eliza the Psychiatrist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a whorish-looking quadriplegic with the personality of Eliza the Psychiatrist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a whorish-looking quadriplegic with the personality of Eliza the Psychiatrist.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30718178</id>
	<title>Sounds nothing like a Cherry 2000!</title>
	<author>twosat</author>
	<datestamp>1263125940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Back in the 80's they had already predicted a much-more realistic robot in the movie Cherry 2000. www.youtube.com/watch?v=kckEEQKXaCU</htmltext>
<tokenext>Back in the 80 's they had already predicted a much-more realistic robot in the movie Cherry 2000. www.youtube.com/watch ? v = kckEEQKXaCU</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back in the 80's they had already predicted a much-more realistic robot in the movie Cherry 2000. www.youtube.com/watch?v=kckEEQKXaCU</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713294</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263114480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By the way, you're gay?  Good for you.  Don't give a shit.  Your sexual orientation doesn't enter into it.  If you were straight, what he said would still have been sexist and *gasp*, so would what you said.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By the way , you 're gay ?
Good for you .
Do n't give a shit .
Your sexual orientation does n't enter into it .
If you were straight , what he said would still have been sexist and * gasp * , so would what you said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By the way, you're gay?
Good for you.
Don't give a shit.
Your sexual orientation doesn't enter into it.
If you were straight, what he said would still have been sexist and *gasp*, so would what you said.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711642</id>
	<title>Re:This thread is worthless without pics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263049080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let me be the first to say: thanks, High-C, thanks for getting us all excited and luring us to a site where we could see only <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary\_Carey\_(pornographic\_actress)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">some fugly fake-boobed porn star</a> [wikipedia.org]'s ankles and showing us what was considered erotic back in 1810. I expect you the upload the pics and the video of your AVN Expo visit within 10 minutes and post the URLs here... I'll be waiting...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me be the first to say : thanks , High-C , thanks for getting us all excited and luring us to a site where we could see only some fugly fake-boobed porn star [ wikipedia.org ] 's ankles and showing us what was considered erotic back in 1810 .
I expect you the upload the pics and the video of your AVN Expo visit within 10 minutes and post the URLs here... I 'll be waiting.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me be the first to say: thanks, High-C, thanks for getting us all excited and luring us to a site where we could see only some fugly fake-boobed porn star [wikipedia.org]'s ankles and showing us what was considered erotic back in 1810.
I expect you the upload the pics and the video of your AVN Expo visit within 10 minutes and post the URLs here... I'll be waiting...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714350</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263136740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How the hell was this modded insightful so many times.  Jeez, it was a JOKE, you don't need to get so amazingly offended.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How the hell was this modded insightful so many times .
Jeez , it was a JOKE , you do n't need to get so amazingly offended .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How the hell was this modded insightful so many times.
Jeez, it was a JOKE, you don't need to get so amazingly offended.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711444</id>
	<title>I, for one,</title>
	<author>Noughmad</author>
	<datestamp>1263047460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>welcome our robotic sex doll overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>welcome our robotic sex doll overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>welcome our robotic sex doll overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026</id>
	<title>Re:We had sex robots for a long, long time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263052020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of my past 5 girlfriends, all had at least one vibrator or dildo.  Not that I've asked, but I don't know any guys that have a pocket pussy or the like.  If a girl has a 12" rubber uncut black cock, would she consider you a freak for having a flesh light?  Somehow, I think she would.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of my past 5 girlfriends , all had at least one vibrator or dildo .
Not that I 've asked , but I do n't know any guys that have a pocket pussy or the like .
If a girl has a 12 " rubber uncut black cock , would she consider you a freak for having a flesh light ?
Somehow , I think she would .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of my past 5 girlfriends, all had at least one vibrator or dildo.
Not that I've asked, but I don't know any guys that have a pocket pussy or the like.
If a girl has a 12" rubber uncut black cock, would she consider you a freak for having a flesh light?
Somehow, I think she would.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712106</id>
	<title>fgdg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263052860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">Burberry handbags Replica</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">Louis Vuitton Handbags Replica</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">Replica Gucci Handbags</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/FENDI-Handbag-12-1.htm" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">Replica FENDI Handbag</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.china-goods-wholesale.org/" title="china-good...lesale.org" rel="nofollow">China Clothing Wholesale</a> [china-good...lesale.org]<br><a href="http://www.51pifa.org/" title="51pifa.org" rel="nofollow">|</a> [51pifa.org]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/Scarf-25-1.htm" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">Burberry scarves scarf</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/Louis-Vuitton-Wallets-10-1.htm" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">Louis Vuitton Wallets Replica</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/Scarf-25-1.htm" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">Louis Vuitton Hermes scarves scarf</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/Louis-Vuitton-Handbag-1-1.htm" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">Replica Louis Vuitton Handbag</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/Gucci-Handbag-2-1.htm" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">Gucci Handbags Replica</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.scarf-scarves-wholesale.org/" title="scarf-scar...lesale.org" rel="nofollow">scarf scarves wholesale</a> [scarf-scar...lesale.org]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/Hermes-Handbag-4-1.htm" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">Hermes Handbag Replica</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/Burberry-Handbag-7-1.htm" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">Replica Burberry handbags</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/Prada-Handbag-6-1.htm" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">prada handbags</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/Louis-Vuitton-Handbag-1-1.htm" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">Replica lv scarf</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/Gucci-Handbag-2-1.htm" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">gucci purses on sale</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">knock off burberry wallet</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-watches-wholesale.org/" title="replica-wa...lesale.org" rel="nofollow">replica watches wholesale</a> [replica-wa...lesale.org]<br><a href="http://www.replica-handbags-wholesale.org/" title="replica-ha...lesale.org" rel="nofollow">wholesale replica handbags</a> [replica-ha...lesale.org]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/Mulberry-Handbag-18-1.htm/" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">Mulberry Handbags Replica</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">stephen sprouse louis vuitton replica</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">Replica vuitton bags</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-china.net/" title="replica-china.net" rel="nofollow">burberry messenger bag replica</a> [replica-china.net]<br><a href="http://www.replica-handbags-wholesale.org/" title="replica-ha...lesale.org" rel="nofollow">replica handbags wholesale</a> [replica-ha...lesale.org]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Burberry handbags Replica [ replica-china.net ] Louis Vuitton Handbags Replica [ replica-china.net ] Replica Gucci Handbags [ replica-china.net ] Replica FENDI Handbag [ replica-china.net ] China Clothing Wholesale [ china-good...lesale.org ] | [ 51pifa.org ] Burberry scarves scarf [ replica-china.net ] Louis Vuitton Wallets Replica [ replica-china.net ] Louis Vuitton Hermes scarves scarf [ replica-china.net ] Replica Louis Vuitton Handbag [ replica-china.net ] Gucci Handbags Replica [ replica-china.net ] scarf scarves wholesale [ scarf-scar...lesale.org ] Hermes Handbag Replica [ replica-china.net ] Replica Burberry handbags [ replica-china.net ] prada handbags [ replica-china.net ] Replica lv scarf [ replica-china.net ] gucci purses on sale [ replica-china.net ] knock off burberry wallet [ replica-china.net ] replica watches wholesale [ replica-wa...lesale.org ] wholesale replica handbags [ replica-ha...lesale.org ] Mulberry Handbags Replica [ replica-china.net ] stephen sprouse louis vuitton replica [ replica-china.net ] Replica vuitton bags [ replica-china.net ] burberry messenger bag replica [ replica-china.net ] replica handbags wholesale [ replica-ha...lesale.org ]                            </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Burberry handbags Replica [replica-china.net]Louis Vuitton Handbags Replica [replica-china.net]Replica Gucci Handbags [replica-china.net]Replica FENDI Handbag [replica-china.net]China Clothing Wholesale [china-good...lesale.org]| [51pifa.org]Burberry scarves scarf [replica-china.net]Louis Vuitton Wallets Replica [replica-china.net]Louis Vuitton Hermes scarves scarf [replica-china.net]Replica Louis Vuitton Handbag [replica-china.net]Gucci Handbags Replica [replica-china.net]scarf scarves wholesale [scarf-scar...lesale.org]Hermes Handbag Replica [replica-china.net]Replica Burberry handbags [replica-china.net]prada handbags [replica-china.net]Replica lv scarf [replica-china.net]gucci purses on sale [replica-china.net]knock off burberry wallet [replica-china.net]replica watches wholesale [replica-wa...lesale.org]wholesale replica handbags [replica-ha...lesale.org]Mulberry Handbags Replica [replica-china.net]stephen sprouse louis vuitton replica [replica-china.net]Replica vuitton bags [replica-china.net]burberry messenger bag replica [replica-china.net]replica handbags wholesale [replica-ha...lesale.org]
                           </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711758</id>
	<title>I bet that..</title>
	<author>DriftingDutchman</author>
	<datestamp>1263049980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>..this time, most slashdotters actually RTFA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>..this time , most slashdotters actually RTFA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..this time, most slashdotters actually RTFA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30785960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30735106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30785884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30721286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30719762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30715930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30776154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30736122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30721732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30724534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30744352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30722254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30715332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30717910
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30715786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30723918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711862
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30847316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30721350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30784972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30719294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30720526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30719496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30785800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30720988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30717552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30737244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30729288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30717060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30728556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713922
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30717118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30715002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0113248_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30721350
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712162
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30785800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711496
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711696
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711848
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711534
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713148
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30744352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711878
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712030
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713710
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712786
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712958
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714954
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713804
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712204
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30720526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30715930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30729288
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712574
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713930
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30722254
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30724534
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30847316
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30719294
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30717552
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30736122
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30784972
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30717118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712026
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712544
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714964
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30715002
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30719496
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712396
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712190
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712914
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713100
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30715332
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714164
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714458
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30717060
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30721286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30723918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712014
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712454
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712232
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711880
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30720988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712392
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712158
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711746
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712018
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30776154
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711846
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711902
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712600
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713412
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712930
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713978
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713082
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30719762
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714250
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30728556
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713108
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713448
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714478
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30721732
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713300
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30785960
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714350
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713212
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713294
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713034
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713270
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712768
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713038
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713118
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712934
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713504
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713452
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30735106
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713414
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711474
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711842
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712248
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712310
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714018
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712458
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713922
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713588
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712668
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712094
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30785884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711852
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714592
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30717910
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713762
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30715786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711754
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30713694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712792
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714572
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30737244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30714042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0113248.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30711348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0113248.30712296
</commentlist>
</conversation>
