<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_07_0314220</id>
	<title>Nexus One Name Irks Philip K. Dick's Estate</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1262869020000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>RevWaldo writes <i>"According to the Wall Street Journal, the estate of Philip K. Dick says the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703436504574640623301172810.html?mod=WSJ\_hps\_LEFTWhatsNews">name of Google's new smartphone infringes on the famous character name</a> from <em>Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?</em>.  Isa Dick Hackett, a daughter of Mr. Dick, states Google has its 'Android system, and now they are naming a phone "Nexus One." It's not lost on the people who are somewhat familiar with this novel... Our legal team is dealing head-on with this.'" </i></htmltext>
<tokenext>RevWaldo writes " According to the Wall Street Journal , the estate of Philip K. Dick says the name of Google 's new smartphone infringes on the famous character name from Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep ? .
Isa Dick Hackett , a daughter of Mr. Dick , states Google has its 'Android system , and now they are naming a phone " Nexus One .
" It 's not lost on the people who are somewhat familiar with this novel... Our legal team is dealing head-on with this .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RevWaldo writes "According to the Wall Street Journal, the estate of Philip K. Dick says the name of Google's new smartphone infringes on the famous character name from Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?.
Isa Dick Hackett, a daughter of Mr. Dick, states Google has its 'Android system, and now they are naming a phone "Nexus One.
" It's not lost on the people who are somewhat familiar with this novel... Our legal team is dealing head-on with this.
'" </sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681324</id>
	<title>America</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262873460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Starting stupid lawsuits based on thin air, FUCK YEAH!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Starting stupid lawsuits based on thin air , FUCK YEAH !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Starting stupid lawsuits based on thin air, FUCK YEAH!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681480</id>
	<title>my next invention will be called "Luke Skywalker"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262874540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm going to invent some random thing and call it the "Luke Skywalker", why?  because the power supply heat makes it feel LUKEwarm and when you throw it up in the SKY it looks like it is WALKing.  I see no trademark or copyright problems with my scheme.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to invent some random thing and call it the " Luke Skywalker " , why ?
because the power supply heat makes it feel LUKEwarm and when you throw it up in the SKY it looks like it is WALKing .
I see no trademark or copyright problems with my scheme .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to invent some random thing and call it the "Luke Skywalker", why?
because the power supply heat makes it feel LUKEwarm and when you throw it up in the SKY it looks like it is WALKing.
I see no trademark or copyright problems with my scheme.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682036</id>
	<title>Re:Estate</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1262877960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Conrad Hilton had been dead for 30 years, does that mean the Hilton family should give up their hotels?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Conrad Hilton had been dead for 30 years , does that mean the Hilton family should give up their hotels ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Conrad Hilton had been dead for 30 years, does that mean the Hilton family should give up their hotels?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681946</id>
	<title>Re:This is shameful</title>
	<author>just\_another\_sean</author>
	<datestamp>1262877540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Are book sales going to be affected ?</p></div><p>Sure, they'll probably increase a bit as people hear about the phone and go "Oh yeah, I always<br>wanted to read that book!".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are book sales going to be affected ? Sure , they 'll probably increase a bit as people hear about the phone and go " Oh yeah , I alwayswanted to read that book !
" .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are book sales going to be affected ?Sure, they'll probably increase a bit as people hear about the phone and go "Oh yeah, I alwayswanted to read that book!
".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683598</id>
	<title>Re:This is shameful</title>
	<author>Blue Stone</author>
	<datestamp>1262884680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;The people on whom the connection is not lost, would see this as a tribute from Google to Philip K. Dick.</p><p>Agreed. And if the estate of PKD had any sense they'd be trying to license some of their copyrighted material for Google to use in their promotional material, and get some money out of the tribute legitimately.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; The people on whom the connection is not lost , would see this as a tribute from Google to Philip K. Dick.Agreed. And if the estate of PKD had any sense they 'd be trying to license some of their copyrighted material for Google to use in their promotional material , and get some money out of the tribute legitimately .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;The people on whom the connection is not lost, would see this as a tribute from Google to Philip K. Dick.Agreed. And if the estate of PKD had any sense they'd be trying to license some of their copyrighted material for Google to use in their promotional material, and get some money out of the tribute legitimately.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30685068</id>
	<title>Re:How about this...</title>
	<author>mounthood</author>
	<datestamp>1262890440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Free digital copy of "Blade Runner" with every Nexus One (director's cut, of course). Google gets to demo the phones' video chops and gets the coolness cred, PKD's heirs get a chunk of the royalties. Win-win.</p></div><p>The royalty money would have come from somewhere... you do understand that "free" doesn't mean that money just materializes, right? Do you want the price raised to cover this "free" movie, or should Google lose some profit to pay these trolls?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Free digital copy of " Blade Runner " with every Nexus One ( director 's cut , of course ) .
Google gets to demo the phones ' video chops and gets the coolness cred , PKD 's heirs get a chunk of the royalties .
Win-win.The royalty money would have come from somewhere... you do understand that " free " does n't mean that money just materializes , right ?
Do you want the price raised to cover this " free " movie , or should Google lose some profit to pay these trolls ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free digital copy of "Blade Runner" with every Nexus One (director's cut, of course).
Google gets to demo the phones' video chops and gets the coolness cred, PKD's heirs get a chunk of the royalties.
Win-win.The royalty money would have come from somewhere... you do understand that "free" doesn't mean that money just materializes, right?
Do you want the price raised to cover this "free" movie, or should Google lose some profit to pay these trolls?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681878</id>
	<title>Thanks Dick!</title>
	<author>RedHat Rocky</author>
	<datestamp>1262877060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Free press for Google. Thanks Dick!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Free press for Google .
Thanks Dick !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free press for Google.
Thanks Dick!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681500</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory comment on copyright</title>
	<author>exa</author>
	<datestamp>1262874720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if Isa is good in bed. Because whenever I'm reading Dick, I'll feel like I'm effing her from now on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if Isa is good in bed .
Because whenever I 'm reading Dick , I 'll feel like I 'm effing her from now on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if Isa is good in bed.
Because whenever I'm reading Dick, I'll feel like I'm effing her from now on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30690178</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck the estate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262876880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like the idea that a just society burns people as devils. It has a certain insane symmetry to it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the idea that a just society burns people as devils .
It has a certain insane symmetry to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the idea that a just society burns people as devils.
It has a certain insane symmetry to it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682278</id>
	<title>Re:Estate</title>
	<author>Wonko the Sane</author>
	<datestamp>1262879100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By continuing to operate the family is still providing new services. Collecting royalties from a book written half a century ago creates nothing new at all and is nothing more than rent seeking behavior.</p><p>American IP law was originally designed to allow for a <em>limited</em> amount of rent seeking as an incentive for authors and inventors to create new writings and inventions. Allowing heirs to sit on this "property" indefinitely does not surve this purpose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By continuing to operate the family is still providing new services .
Collecting royalties from a book written half a century ago creates nothing new at all and is nothing more than rent seeking behavior.American IP law was originally designed to allow for a limited amount of rent seeking as an incentive for authors and inventors to create new writings and inventions .
Allowing heirs to sit on this " property " indefinitely does not surve this purpose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By continuing to operate the family is still providing new services.
Collecting royalties from a book written half a century ago creates nothing new at all and is nothing more than rent seeking behavior.American IP law was originally designed to allow for a limited amount of rent seeking as an incentive for authors and inventors to create new writings and inventions.
Allowing heirs to sit on this "property" indefinitely does not surve this purpose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30690756</id>
	<title>Re:This is shameful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262883900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Are book sales going to be affected ?</p></div><p>If they are, most probably they'll be affected in the positive way (which might be good for a younger generation, listening to Gaga and feeding with fast food).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are book sales going to be affected ? If they are , most probably they 'll be affected in the positive way ( which might be good for a younger generation , listening to Gaga and feeding with fast food ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are book sales going to be affected ?If they are, most probably they'll be affected in the positive way (which might be good for a younger generation, listening to Gaga and feeding with fast food).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684604</id>
	<title>Planned Obselenscence</title>
	<author>mattOzan</author>
	<datestamp>1262888580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You won't even be allowed to possess the sixth version of this Nexus phone on the planet Earth.  It will only be for use in the off-world colonies.</p><p>Special Verizon squads have orders to destroy, upon detection, any Nexus Six phone.  This is called "retirement," and is not covered under warranty.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You wo n't even be allowed to possess the sixth version of this Nexus phone on the planet Earth .
It will only be for use in the off-world colonies.Special Verizon squads have orders to destroy , upon detection , any Nexus Six phone .
This is called " retirement , " and is not covered under warranty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You won't even be allowed to possess the sixth version of this Nexus phone on the planet Earth.
It will only be for use in the off-world colonies.Special Verizon squads have orders to destroy, upon detection, any Nexus Six phone.
This is called "retirement," and is not covered under warranty.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681534</id>
	<title>In related news...</title>
	<author>spywhere</author>
	<datestamp>1262874960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Isaac Asimov's bloated corpse is suing over the Japanese robot named Asimo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Isaac Asimov 's bloated corpse is suing over the Japanese robot named Asimo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Isaac Asimov's bloated corpse is suing over the Japanese robot named Asimo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30692030</id>
	<title>Re:How about this...</title>
	<author>True Grit</author>
	<datestamp>1262944440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Win-win.</p></div><p>Except for the lawyers. (Not necessarily saying thats a bad thing, of course...)</p><p>Otherwise, I like it, but it won't happen.  Makes too much sense.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Win-win.Except for the lawyers .
( Not necessarily saying thats a bad thing , of course... ) Otherwise , I like it , but it wo n't happen .
Makes too much sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Win-win.Except for the lawyers.
(Not necessarily saying thats a bad thing, of course...)Otherwise, I like it, but it won't happen.
Makes too much sense.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686222</id>
	<title>Re:I Actually Side with Dick's Estate</title>
	<author>Archangel Michael</author>
	<datestamp>1262895720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I believe that better than ripping Dick Off, Google just needs to bring the Dictionary to the court and present the definition of "Nexus"</p><blockquote><div><p>     a means of connection; tie; link. From the Latin, a binding, joining, fastening, equiv. to nect(ere) to bind, fasten, tie</p></div> </blockquote><p><b>Nexus One</b> is a very logical choice for a first device designed to connect people together, and does not even need to be a reference to Bladerunner or any other Dick work at all.</p><p>My $.02 worth</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I believe that better than ripping Dick Off , Google just needs to bring the Dictionary to the court and present the definition of " Nexus " a means of connection ; tie ; link .
From the Latin , a binding , joining , fastening , equiv .
to nect ( ere ) to bind , fasten , tie Nexus One is a very logical choice for a first device designed to connect people together , and does not even need to be a reference to Bladerunner or any other Dick work at all.My $ .02 worth</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I believe that better than ripping Dick Off, Google just needs to bring the Dictionary to the court and present the definition of "Nexus"     a means of connection; tie; link.
From the Latin, a binding, joining, fastening, equiv.
to nect(ere) to bind, fasten, tie Nexus One is a very logical choice for a first device designed to connect people together, and does not even need to be a reference to Bladerunner or any other Dick work at all.My $.02 worth
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30691938</id>
	<title>Mickey...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262943000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uh, Walt Disney happens to be dead too (or at least frozen)</p><p>Shouldn't Mickey Mouse be PD as well...?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh , Walt Disney happens to be dead too ( or at least frozen ) Should n't Mickey Mouse be PD as well... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh, Walt Disney happens to be dead too (or at least frozen)Shouldn't Mickey Mouse be PD as well...?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681440</id>
	<title>In this post I now copyright...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262874300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm now copyrighting NEXUS TWO, NEXUS THREE and NEXUS FOUR by using these in my post.<br><br>When Google brings out next generations of its phone, I'll sue them and become rich!<br><br>You gotta think ahead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm now copyrighting NEXUS TWO , NEXUS THREE and NEXUS FOUR by using these in my post.When Google brings out next generations of its phone , I 'll sue them and become rich ! You got ta think ahead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm now copyrighting NEXUS TWO, NEXUS THREE and NEXUS FOUR by using these in my post.When Google brings out next generations of its phone, I'll sue them and become rich!You gotta think ahead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238</id>
	<title>Re:I Actually Side with Dick's Estate</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1262872860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, the headline should read - Google rips off Dick.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , the headline should read - Google rips off Dick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, the headline should read - Google rips off Dick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682060</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262878080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No but then again Google are not using Nexus-6 and both Nexus and One are in the dictionary.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No but then again Google are not using Nexus-6 and both Nexus and One are in the dictionary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No but then again Google are not using Nexus-6 and both Nexus and One are in the dictionary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681668</id>
	<title>Unhappy?  How about Phil Dick's name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262875800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>His parasitic offspring inherited an appropriate surname.</htmltext>
<tokenext>His parasitic offspring inherited an appropriate surname .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His parasitic offspring inherited an appropriate surname.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681222</id>
	<title>I Actually Side with Dick's Estate</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1262872620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read about this almost a month ago in <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/15/is-the-google-phone-an-unauthorized-replicant/" title="nytimes.com" rel="nofollow">the New York Times blogs</a> [nytimes.com] and must point out one very important detail (to me at least) about this case that was not present in The Wall Street Journal article: Google applied for a <a href="http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&amp;entry=77891022" title="uspto.gov" rel="nofollow">trademark on "NEXUS ONE"</a> [uspto.gov].  Now it's not even assigned to an examining attorney yet but come on.  You can 'borrow' something from a novel but if you're going to be making money, hand over fist, with it you should probably get permission.  And then on top of that you go after the trademark since Dick never did?  <br> <br>

Even Motorola had the wherewithal to kindly ask Lucas before using Droid as a name for their phone because 'droid' is a registered trademark of Lucasfilm Ltd.  You would think the least amount of courtesy Google could do is not apply for a trademark out of respect of where they borrowed 'nexus one' from.  And if Google's afraid that someone will just use that name to profit off of their device then they should just find another name instead of borrowing from a novel (deflating the argument of "they have no choice, they have to trademark everything they do").  I'm hoping that this is some Google executive not realizing that 'nexus one' is a reference to a Philip K. Dick android but now it looks more like them toeing the line of what they could use and then completely running off with it.  <br> <br>

If they were just using the name, I'd consider this a nice homage or nod to the late great Philip K. Dick.  But since they're applying for a trademark it's just a dick move.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read about this almost a month ago in the New York Times blogs [ nytimes.com ] and must point out one very important detail ( to me at least ) about this case that was not present in The Wall Street Journal article : Google applied for a trademark on " NEXUS ONE " [ uspto.gov ] .
Now it 's not even assigned to an examining attorney yet but come on .
You can 'borrow ' something from a novel but if you 're going to be making money , hand over fist , with it you should probably get permission .
And then on top of that you go after the trademark since Dick never did ?
Even Motorola had the wherewithal to kindly ask Lucas before using Droid as a name for their phone because 'droid ' is a registered trademark of Lucasfilm Ltd. You would think the least amount of courtesy Google could do is not apply for a trademark out of respect of where they borrowed 'nexus one ' from .
And if Google 's afraid that someone will just use that name to profit off of their device then they should just find another name instead of borrowing from a novel ( deflating the argument of " they have no choice , they have to trademark everything they do " ) .
I 'm hoping that this is some Google executive not realizing that 'nexus one ' is a reference to a Philip K. Dick android but now it looks more like them toeing the line of what they could use and then completely running off with it .
If they were just using the name , I 'd consider this a nice homage or nod to the late great Philip K. Dick. But since they 're applying for a trademark it 's just a dick move .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read about this almost a month ago in the New York Times blogs [nytimes.com] and must point out one very important detail (to me at least) about this case that was not present in The Wall Street Journal article: Google applied for a trademark on "NEXUS ONE" [uspto.gov].
Now it's not even assigned to an examining attorney yet but come on.
You can 'borrow' something from a novel but if you're going to be making money, hand over fist, with it you should probably get permission.
And then on top of that you go after the trademark since Dick never did?
Even Motorola had the wherewithal to kindly ask Lucas before using Droid as a name for their phone because 'droid' is a registered trademark of Lucasfilm Ltd.  You would think the least amount of courtesy Google could do is not apply for a trademark out of respect of where they borrowed 'nexus one' from.
And if Google's afraid that someone will just use that name to profit off of their device then they should just find another name instead of borrowing from a novel (deflating the argument of "they have no choice, they have to trademark everything they do").
I'm hoping that this is some Google executive not realizing that 'nexus one' is a reference to a Philip K. Dick android but now it looks more like them toeing the line of what they could use and then completely running off with it.
If they were just using the name, I'd consider this a nice homage or nod to the late great Philip K. Dick.  But since they're applying for a trademark it's just a dick move.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682106</id>
	<title>Hooray for Rent Seeking!</title>
	<author>Wonko the Sane</author>
	<datestamp>1262878260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why produce something new youeself when you can extort from those who are?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why produce something new youeself when you can extort from those who are ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why produce something new youeself when you can extort from those who are?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683086</id>
	<title>Re:Corporate Darwinism</title>
	<author>e-scetic</author>
	<datestamp>1262882820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's also Darwinian in the sense that PKD's offspring haven't developed the instincts of the wealthy for protecting their wealth.  Survival of the fittest, natural selection and all that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's also Darwinian in the sense that PKD 's offspring have n't developed the instincts of the wealthy for protecting their wealth .
Survival of the fittest , natural selection and all that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's also Darwinian in the sense that PKD's offspring haven't developed the instincts of the wealthy for protecting their wealth.
Survival of the fittest, natural selection and all that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684620</id>
	<title>This hasn't gone anywhere.</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1262888640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; This has gone way too far...</p><p>It hasn't gone anywhere.  It's just lawyers bloviating: there is no evidence that they have any case nor that they are doing anything but bluffing.  I suspect that they just hoping that Google will pay them off to avoid embarrassment.  It also has nothing to do with copyright.  Their claim (feeble as it is) is based on common-law trademark.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; This has gone way too far...It has n't gone anywhere .
It 's just lawyers bloviating : there is no evidence that they have any case nor that they are doing anything but bluffing .
I suspect that they just hoping that Google will pay them off to avoid embarrassment .
It also has nothing to do with copyright .
Their claim ( feeble as it is ) is based on common-law trademark .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; This has gone way too far...It hasn't gone anywhere.
It's just lawyers bloviating: there is no evidence that they have any case nor that they are doing anything but bluffing.
I suspect that they just hoping that Google will pay them off to avoid embarrassment.
It also has nothing to do with copyright.
Their claim (feeble as it is) is based on common-law trademark.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681298</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30728406</id>
	<title>Man...</title>
	<author>rbp</author>
	<datestamp>1263203460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>His daughter Isa Dick!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>His daughter Isa Dick !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His daughter Isa Dick!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682416</id>
	<title>Re:In this post I now copyright...</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1262879940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, <a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/" title="lexisnexis.com">one company</a> [lexisnexis.com] is clearly setting themselves up for some big lawsuits in the event of a Google-Toyota merger.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , one company [ lexisnexis.com ] is clearly setting themselves up for some big lawsuits in the event of a Google-Toyota merger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, one company [lexisnexis.com] is clearly setting themselves up for some big lawsuits in the event of a Google-Toyota merger.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30685466</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>PeanutButterBreath</author>
	<datestamp>1262892180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It comes from the DICTIONARY.</p></div><p>The Philip K Dictionary.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It comes from the DICTIONARY.The Philip K Dictionary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It comes from the DICTIONARY.The Philip K Dictionary.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681490</id>
	<title>Another infringing greedy corporation?</title>
	<author>Master\_Mahan</author>
	<datestamp>1262874660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They should be suing the Star Trek franchise as well for using the term Nexus in Generations.  They obviously made MILLIONS from that movie...</htmltext>
<tokenext>They should be suing the Star Trek franchise as well for using the term Nexus in Generations .
They obviously made MILLIONS from that movie.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should be suing the Star Trek franchise as well for using the term Nexus in Generations.
They obviously made MILLIONS from that movie...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30689786</id>
	<title>Re:Different Industries? Does that apply here?</title>
	<author>mschuyler</author>
	<datestamp>1262872620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure they are. Sony, the electronics conglomerate, successfully sued a woman named 'Sony' who used her own given name in the name of her restaurant, "Sony's Restaurant." She laid out tens of thousands of dollars in lawyer fees and still lost.</p><p>Back in the BBS days the 'Olympic' BBS in Silverdale, Washington, pretty close to the Olympic Mountains, was sued by the Olympic Committee for daring to name their BBS after the nearby mountain range.</p><p>This is case law. All you folks claiming trademark infringement does not count across industries are just plain wrong, as these cases prove.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure they are .
Sony , the electronics conglomerate , successfully sued a woman named 'Sony ' who used her own given name in the name of her restaurant , " Sony 's Restaurant .
" She laid out tens of thousands of dollars in lawyer fees and still lost.Back in the BBS days the 'Olympic ' BBS in Silverdale , Washington , pretty close to the Olympic Mountains , was sued by the Olympic Committee for daring to name their BBS after the nearby mountain range.This is case law .
All you folks claiming trademark infringement does not count across industries are just plain wrong , as these cases prove .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure they are.
Sony, the electronics conglomerate, successfully sued a woman named 'Sony' who used her own given name in the name of her restaurant, "Sony's Restaurant.
" She laid out tens of thousands of dollars in lawyer fees and still lost.Back in the BBS days the 'Olympic' BBS in Silverdale, Washington, pretty close to the Olympic Mountains, was sued by the Olympic Committee for daring to name their BBS after the nearby mountain range.This is case law.
All you folks claiming trademark infringement does not count across industries are just plain wrong, as these cases prove.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684252</id>
	<title>An old attorney once told me that in the law</title>
	<author>uiucgrad</author>
	<datestamp>1262887140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it is easier to ask for forgiveness than permission.  I suspect that it was a calculated risk by Google to use the name they wanted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it is easier to ask for forgiveness than permission .
I suspect that it was a calculated risk by Google to use the name they wanted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it is easier to ask for forgiveness than permission.
I suspect that it was a calculated risk by Google to use the name they wanted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681580</id>
	<title>Is-a-Dick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262875320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anthony Burgess is resposible for the names Heaven 17, Miloko, Korova (Records) etc...  Borrowing names from fiction is a time honoured tradition and until authors begin trademarking their invented names, one the estate can do fuck all about...</p><p>I should start a band called "Goggly Gogol" (again from clockwork orange) and release a song called "googling for the dick's nexus" just for shits and giggles!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anthony Burgess is resposible for the names Heaven 17 , Miloko , Korova ( Records ) etc... Borrowing names from fiction is a time honoured tradition and until authors begin trademarking their invented names , one the estate can do fuck all about...I should start a band called " Goggly Gogol " ( again from clockwork orange ) and release a song called " googling for the dick 's nexus " just for shits and giggles !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anthony Burgess is resposible for the names Heaven 17, Miloko, Korova (Records) etc...  Borrowing names from fiction is a time honoured tradition and until authors begin trademarking their invented names, one the estate can do fuck all about...I should start a band called "Goggly Gogol" (again from clockwork orange) and release a song called "googling for the dick's nexus" just for shits and giggles!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684740</id>
	<title>There is no IP violation, just some complaining</title>
	<author>AlphaBit</author>
	<datestamp>1262889120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Isa Dick Hackett, a daughter of Mr. Dick, states Google has its 'Android system, and now they are naming a phone "Nexus One."</p></div><p>
Umm, what rights exactly does the PKD estate have over the term android?  Does Isa think Phillip coined the term?  Or came up with it's current usage (William Gibson, I believe)?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>android
"automaton resembling a human being," 1727, from Mod.L. androides, from Gk. andro- "human" + eides "form, shape." Listed as "rare" in OED (1879), popularized from c.1951 by science fiction writers.
<br>
-http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=science</p></div><p>
It seems similar to someone writing a novel about "computers" 30 years ago, with a computer named "Deep Thought", just to have a real company shamelessly create a real "computer" also named "Deep Thought".  I mean, that would just be terrible and ruin the value of the original work...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Isa Dick Hackett , a daughter of Mr. Dick , states Google has its 'Android system , and now they are naming a phone " Nexus One .
" Umm , what rights exactly does the PKD estate have over the term android ?
Does Isa think Phillip coined the term ?
Or came up with it 's current usage ( William Gibson , I believe ) ? android " automaton resembling a human being , " 1727 , from Mod.L .
androides , from Gk .
andro- " human " + eides " form , shape .
" Listed as " rare " in OED ( 1879 ) , popularized from c.1951 by science fiction writers .
-http : //www.etymonline.com/index.php ? search = science It seems similar to someone writing a novel about " computers " 30 years ago , with a computer named " Deep Thought " , just to have a real company shamelessly create a real " computer " also named " Deep Thought " .
I mean , that would just be terrible and ruin the value of the original work.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isa Dick Hackett, a daughter of Mr. Dick, states Google has its 'Android system, and now they are naming a phone "Nexus One.
"
Umm, what rights exactly does the PKD estate have over the term android?
Does Isa think Phillip coined the term?
Or came up with it's current usage (William Gibson, I believe)?android
"automaton resembling a human being," 1727, from Mod.L.
androides, from Gk.
andro- "human" + eides "form, shape.
" Listed as "rare" in OED (1879), popularized from c.1951 by science fiction writers.
-http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=science
It seems similar to someone writing a novel about "computers" 30 years ago, with a computer named "Deep Thought", just to have a real company shamelessly create a real "computer" also named "Deep Thought".
I mean, that would just be terrible and ruin the value of the original work...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681952</id>
	<title>Whatabout the Nexus record label(s)?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262877540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Money talks, for lawyers anyhows. In the world of music there have been gazillions of artists and record labels calling themselves 'Nexus [n]' (where n can be 1, 6 or 21). Some of these have been homage to PKD and the lawyers should have gone for them ages ago, that is if they cared about preserving the 'Nexus' brand, but they don't. I say boycott PKD and get a Google phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Money talks , for lawyers anyhows .
In the world of music there have been gazillions of artists and record labels calling themselves 'Nexus [ n ] ' ( where n can be 1 , 6 or 21 ) .
Some of these have been homage to PKD and the lawyers should have gone for them ages ago , that is if they cared about preserving the 'Nexus ' brand , but they do n't .
I say boycott PKD and get a Google phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Money talks, for lawyers anyhows.
In the world of music there have been gazillions of artists and record labels calling themselves 'Nexus [n]' (where n can be 1, 6 or 21).
Some of these have been homage to PKD and the lawyers should have gone for them ages ago, that is if they cared about preserving the 'Nexus' brand, but they don't.
I say boycott PKD and get a Google phone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30691296</id>
	<title>fuck 'em</title>
	<author>cas2000</author>
	<datestamp>1262891880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they dont own the word android or the word nexus.</p><p>i don't care if P. K. Dick did write some excellent SF stories, his estate are just another bunch scumbags trying to own the language.</p><p>copyright over a story - or any other work - does NOT give rights to anything and everything even vaguely related to that work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they dont own the word android or the word nexus.i do n't care if P. K. Dick did write some excellent SF stories , his estate are just another bunch scumbags trying to own the language.copyright over a story - or any other work - does NOT give rights to anything and everything even vaguely related to that work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they dont own the word android or the word nexus.i don't care if P. K. Dick did write some excellent SF stories, his estate are just another bunch scumbags trying to own the language.copyright over a story - or any other work - does NOT give rights to anything and everything even vaguely related to that work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681298</id>
	<title>Too Far</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262873340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This has gone way too far, in two ways.  One, we are not talking about a book, we are talking about a WORD.  Two, Philip's heirs should not earn ongoing profits from work done by Philip a generation ago.  Has their income incentivized them to produce anything noteworthy themselves?  I think not; in direct contradiction to the whole point of congress's authority to assign limited monopolies.</p><p>Google should do two things.  The should fight this in the courts, but much more importantly, they should use their considerable resources and clout to lobby congress to update the legal framework such that it encourages, rather than hinders, innovation in the sciences and the useful arts.  Congress, elected by the people, has the last word on this one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has gone way too far , in two ways .
One , we are not talking about a book , we are talking about a WORD .
Two , Philip 's heirs should not earn ongoing profits from work done by Philip a generation ago .
Has their income incentivized them to produce anything noteworthy themselves ?
I think not ; in direct contradiction to the whole point of congress 's authority to assign limited monopolies.Google should do two things .
The should fight this in the courts , but much more importantly , they should use their considerable resources and clout to lobby congress to update the legal framework such that it encourages , rather than hinders , innovation in the sciences and the useful arts .
Congress , elected by the people , has the last word on this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has gone way too far, in two ways.
One, we are not talking about a book, we are talking about a WORD.
Two, Philip's heirs should not earn ongoing profits from work done by Philip a generation ago.
Has their income incentivized them to produce anything noteworthy themselves?
I think not; in direct contradiction to the whole point of congress's authority to assign limited monopolies.Google should do two things.
The should fight this in the courts, but much more importantly, they should use their considerable resources and clout to lobby congress to update the legal framework such that it encourages, rather than hinders, innovation in the sciences and the useful arts.
Congress, elected by the people, has the last word on this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682066</id>
	<title>Estate should license to another company</title>
	<author>The Second Horseman</author>
	<datestamp>1262878080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>License the name to another company for use in another product - say, a sex toy. Something Google really doesn't want to be associated with.</p><p>Sure, maybe the estate doesn't either, but it'll bother Google a whole lot more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>License the name to another company for use in another product - say , a sex toy .
Something Google really does n't want to be associated with.Sure , maybe the estate does n't either , but it 'll bother Google a whole lot more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>License the name to another company for use in another product - say, a sex toy.
Something Google really doesn't want to be associated with.Sure, maybe the estate doesn't either, but it'll bother Google a whole lot more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681680</id>
	<title>Well actually....</title>
	<author>RevWaldo</author>
	<datestamp>1262875860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was an issue with Apple Computer's name and logo being too similar to that of the Beatles' Apple Corps. There was basically a "we're cool with it" agreement so long as Apple Computer stayed out of the music business and Apple Corps stayed out of the computer business. And then the iPod came out..<p>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple\_Corps\_v.\_Apple\_Computer" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple\_Corps\_v.\_Apple\_Computer</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was an issue with Apple Computer 's name and logo being too similar to that of the Beatles ' Apple Corps .
There was basically a " we 're cool with it " agreement so long as Apple Computer stayed out of the music business and Apple Corps stayed out of the computer business .
And then the iPod came out. . http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple \ _Corps \ _v. \ _Apple \ _Computer [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was an issue with Apple Computer's name and logo being too similar to that of the Beatles' Apple Corps.
There was basically a "we're cool with it" agreement so long as Apple Computer stayed out of the music business and Apple Corps stayed out of the computer business.
And then the iPod came out..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple\_Corps\_v.\_Apple\_Computer [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30691226</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>inKubus</author>
	<datestamp>1262890920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I KNOW. What a DICK!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I KNOW .
What a DICK !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I KNOW.
What a DICK!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30691328</id>
	<title>How about the Nex.  Or anything less baroque.</title>
	<author>dgallard</author>
	<datestamp>1262892180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My full editorial on the choice of name at:<br><a href="http://oceanpark.com/blog/2010/01/the-google-phone/" title="oceanpark.com" rel="nofollow">http://oceanpark.com/blog/2010/01/the-google-phone/</a> [oceanpark.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My full editorial on the choice of name at : http : //oceanpark.com/blog/2010/01/the-google-phone/ [ oceanpark.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My full editorial on the choice of name at:http://oceanpark.com/blog/2010/01/the-google-phone/ [oceanpark.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682752</id>
	<title>simple solution</title>
	<author>pydev</author>
	<datestamp>1262881620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google should rename the "Nexus One" to "Dickhead One".  Let's see whether Dick's estate wants to claim ownership of <i>that</i> name<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google should rename the " Nexus One " to " Dickhead One " .
Let 's see whether Dick 's estate wants to claim ownership of that name : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google should rename the "Nexus One" to "Dickhead One".
Let's see whether Dick's estate wants to claim ownership of that name :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681882</id>
	<title>Yeah...</title>
	<author>TiberSeptm</author>
	<datestamp>1262877060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the estate was actually concerned with protecting the uniqueness of their trademarks they would have sued Scalzi for his book "The Android's Dream."  While the content is very different, it's actually a novel as opposed to a consumer electronics product.  More than that, it's a science fiction novel and I'm sure at least 2 people have honestly confused the two when looking to buy one.  In that case though, it would be someone looking for Scalzi's book who accidentaly bought Dick's that would have felt screwed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the estate was actually concerned with protecting the uniqueness of their trademarks they would have sued Scalzi for his book " The Android 's Dream .
" While the content is very different , it 's actually a novel as opposed to a consumer electronics product .
More than that , it 's a science fiction novel and I 'm sure at least 2 people have honestly confused the two when looking to buy one .
In that case though , it would be someone looking for Scalzi 's book who accidentaly bought Dick 's that would have felt screwed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the estate was actually concerned with protecting the uniqueness of their trademarks they would have sued Scalzi for his book "The Android's Dream.
"  While the content is very different, it's actually a novel as opposed to a consumer electronics product.
More than that, it's a science fiction novel and I'm sure at least 2 people have honestly confused the two when looking to buy one.
In that case though, it would be someone looking for Scalzi's book who accidentaly bought Dick's that would have felt screwed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30687164</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>Actually, I do RTFA</author>
	<datestamp>1262857020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>a novel is not a phone.</p></div></blockquote><p>But it's an all-purpose electronic device in a novel.  Can I create "Home Sweet Tara" placards [Tara is the mansion from "Gone With the Wind"]?  It's obviously an allusion.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>a novel is not a phone.But it 's an all-purpose electronic device in a novel .
Can I create " Home Sweet Tara " placards [ Tara is the mansion from " Gone With the Wind " ] ?
It 's obviously an allusion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a novel is not a phone.But it's an all-purpose electronic device in a novel.
Can I create "Home Sweet Tara" placards [Tara is the mansion from "Gone With the Wind"]?
It's obviously an allusion.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682298</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>l3v1</author>
	<datestamp>1262879160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think it's the word just by itself that it's the problem here, but the pairing of the words Android and Nexus regarding the same product. It's hard not to see the connection.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think it 's the word just by itself that it 's the problem here , but the pairing of the words Android and Nexus regarding the same product .
It 's hard not to see the connection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think it's the word just by itself that it's the problem here, but the pairing of the words Android and Nexus regarding the same product.
It's hard not to see the connection.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682176</id>
	<title>Give me a break</title>
	<author>joeyblades</author>
	<datestamp>1262878620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IANAL, but it seems like the Dick estate has no case.<br>If Google had named the phone Nexus-6... maybe... but probably not.<br>Naming the phone Nexus-One may be a slight nod to DADOES, but not a blatant one.<br>Most people, if they look up the word "nexus" are going to learn that it means a connection between things. Given that we are talking about a smartphone that connects people to the world... I think Google is in the clear.</p><p>This strikes me as a clear case of a Dick trying to get some free money through a frivolous lawsuit...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IANAL , but it seems like the Dick estate has no case.If Google had named the phone Nexus-6... maybe... but probably not.Naming the phone Nexus-One may be a slight nod to DADOES , but not a blatant one.Most people , if they look up the word " nexus " are going to learn that it means a connection between things .
Given that we are talking about a smartphone that connects people to the world... I think Google is in the clear.This strikes me as a clear case of a Dick trying to get some free money through a frivolous lawsuit.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IANAL, but it seems like the Dick estate has no case.If Google had named the phone Nexus-6... maybe... but probably not.Naming the phone Nexus-One may be a slight nod to DADOES, but not a blatant one.Most people, if they look up the word "nexus" are going to learn that it means a connection between things.
Given that we are talking about a smartphone that connects people to the world... I think Google is in the clear.This strikes me as a clear case of a Dick trying to get some free money through a frivolous lawsuit...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682398</id>
	<title>Is-a-dick-hack-it-off, head-on-off, sheep no no no</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262879880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isa is a Dick, Hackett, Head-on, Sheep... all appearing... in the same paragraph... too... painful... Please... stop...</p><p>Mr. Krotch Hertz</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Isa is a Dick , Hackett , Head-on , Sheep... all appearing... in the same paragraph... too... painful... Please... stop...Mr. Krotch Hertz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isa is a Dick, Hackett, Head-on, Sheep... all appearing... in the same paragraph... too... painful... Please... stop...Mr. Krotch Hertz</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684726</id>
	<title>Apropos naming.</title>
	<author>FuckTheModerators</author>
	<datestamp>1262889060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So an arguably justifiable lawsuit is brought about by someone whose name is "Isa Dick"?<br> <br>
Anyone surprised?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So an arguably justifiable lawsuit is brought about by someone whose name is " Isa Dick " ?
Anyone surprised ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So an arguably justifiable lawsuit is brought about by someone whose name is "Isa Dick"?
Anyone surprised?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681890</id>
	<title>Fuck the estate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262877120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bunch of god damn parasites. PKD is DEAD. In my view that leaves his work should be public domain. Is that the law? No, the law presently favours the leeches, the parasites, the lawyers. I'm no big fan of Google as a company, but I say "go for it, Google". Fuck these people. PKD is dead. None of the people involved had anything to do with his writing or work or creativity. They are leeches existing at the pig trough of Imaginary Property rights. In a more just society they would be burned as devils.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bunch of god damn parasites .
PKD is DEAD .
In my view that leaves his work should be public domain .
Is that the law ?
No , the law presently favours the leeches , the parasites , the lawyers .
I 'm no big fan of Google as a company , but I say " go for it , Google " .
Fuck these people .
PKD is dead .
None of the people involved had anything to do with his writing or work or creativity .
They are leeches existing at the pig trough of Imaginary Property rights .
In a more just society they would be burned as devils .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bunch of god damn parasites.
PKD is DEAD.
In my view that leaves his work should be public domain.
Is that the law?
No, the law presently favours the leeches, the parasites, the lawyers.
I'm no big fan of Google as a company, but I say "go for it, Google".
Fuck these people.
PKD is dead.
None of the people involved had anything to do with his writing or work or creativity.
They are leeches existing at the pig trough of Imaginary Property rights.
In a more just society they would be burned as devils.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684248</id>
	<title>Sheep</title>
	<author>MDMurphy</author>
	<datestamp>1262887080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks to the Dick family, I now have the idea to make the screen saver for my new phone be electric sheep.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks to the Dick family , I now have the idea to make the screen saver for my new phone be electric sheep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks to the Dick family, I now have the idea to make the screen saver for my new phone be electric sheep.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682452</id>
	<title>Re:I Actually Side with Dick's Estate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262880120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or, "Google Jerks Dick Around"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , " Google Jerks Dick Around "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, "Google Jerks Dick Around"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683572</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>kellyb9</author>
	<datestamp>1262884620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good point... I think Webster's might also have a claim against Google.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good point... I think Webster 's might also have a claim against Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good point... I think Webster's might also have a claim against Google.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681948</id>
	<title>Re:I Actually Side with Dick's Estate</title>
	<author>glebovitz</author>
	<datestamp>1262877540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would like the title: "whose the bigger Dick, Google or Phillip K."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would like the title : " whose the bigger Dick , Google or Phillip K. "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would like the title: "whose the bigger Dick, Google or Phillip K."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681678</id>
	<title>What really irks me is...</title>
	<author>dushkin</author>
	<datestamp>1262875860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The name "Dick"... heh heh... that name means "penis".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The name " Dick " ... heh heh... that name means " penis " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The name "Dick"... heh heh... that name means "penis".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682048</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory comment on copyright</title>
	<author>Gulthek</author>
	<datestamp>1262878020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not flamebait, just a simple misreading. Of course the works *should* be in the public domain.</p><p>In other words: *woosh*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not flamebait , just a simple misreading .
Of course the works * should * be in the public domain.In other words : * woosh *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not flamebait, just a simple misreading.
Of course the works *should* be in the public domain.In other words: *woosh*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683346</id>
	<title>Different Industries? Does that apply here?</title>
	<author>mschirmer</author>
	<datestamp>1262883780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See, I thought the thing with Trademarks were that they aren't enforceable over different broad industries? Or have I got American Trademark law completely wrong? If Apple can't sue a grocery store for trademark breaches because it is in a different broad industry, then why should this lawsuit ever be ruled in Dick's favor since the two words, trademarked or not, are un-related (one being a fictional character reference in a book, another being an IT product).</p><p>Could someone clear this confusion up for me?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See , I thought the thing with Trademarks were that they are n't enforceable over different broad industries ?
Or have I got American Trademark law completely wrong ?
If Apple ca n't sue a grocery store for trademark breaches because it is in a different broad industry , then why should this lawsuit ever be ruled in Dick 's favor since the two words , trademarked or not , are un-related ( one being a fictional character reference in a book , another being an IT product ) .Could someone clear this confusion up for me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See, I thought the thing with Trademarks were that they aren't enforceable over different broad industries?
Or have I got American Trademark law completely wrong?
If Apple can't sue a grocery store for trademark breaches because it is in a different broad industry, then why should this lawsuit ever be ruled in Dick's favor since the two words, trademarked or not, are un-related (one being a fictional character reference in a book, another being an IT product).Could someone clear this confusion up for me?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681662</id>
	<title>Conversely...</title>
	<author>elocinanna</author>
	<datestamp>1262875740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If Google loses they could sue the dictionaries for including their trademark!
<a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/GOOGLE" title="merriam-webster.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/GOOGLE</a> [merriam-webster.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Google loses they could sue the dictionaries for including their trademark !
http : //www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/GOOGLE [ merriam-webster.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Google loses they could sue the dictionaries for including their trademark!
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/GOOGLE [merriam-webster.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681774</id>
	<title>Re:Too Far</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262876460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree, the new rule is that if your "estate" brings forth stupid or silly charges about a word used in a book, you get a UAV dispatched by the airforce to blow the living hell out of your estate.</p><p>Also Lawyers should suffer the death penalty for filing anything that is detrimental to society or act in any way that harms the greater good.</p><p>Nuke em from orbit I say....  Or at least an angry mob with pitchforks and a noose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , the new rule is that if your " estate " brings forth stupid or silly charges about a word used in a book , you get a UAV dispatched by the airforce to blow the living hell out of your estate.Also Lawyers should suffer the death penalty for filing anything that is detrimental to society or act in any way that harms the greater good.Nuke em from orbit I say.... Or at least an angry mob with pitchforks and a noose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, the new rule is that if your "estate" brings forth stupid or silly charges about a word used in a book, you get a UAV dispatched by the airforce to blow the living hell out of your estate.Also Lawyers should suffer the death penalty for filing anything that is detrimental to society or act in any way that harms the greater good.Nuke em from orbit I say....  Or at least an angry mob with pitchforks and a noose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681298</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686934</id>
	<title>Re:How about this...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262856000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But that's not American business... A good transaction is always win-lose. I mean, fuck the other guy, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But that 's not American business... A good transaction is always win-lose .
I mean , fuck the other guy , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But that's not American business... A good transaction is always win-lose.
I mean, fuck the other guy, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681526</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262874900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So is "apple", would you name your new phone like that?</p><p>Trademarks is all about registering common words for business purposes. And it makes some sense (at least much more than patents or copyright).</p></div><p>Eh, you don't know much about trademarks then. In general, the more generic the word is, the harder it is to trademark and the less protection you get. If you make up a word, that's better. If you have a non-obvious word, that's also better.</p><p>This is why you see businesses called "Kwik-E-Mart" instead of "Quick Market", or "Pentium" CPUs instead of "586s" (even if the CPUID does say 586 on it).</p><p>It doesn't have anything to do with the ongoing abuse against the English language, though it certainly contributes to it.</p><p>Capcha: Cohere</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So is " apple " , would you name your new phone like that ? Trademarks is all about registering common words for business purposes .
And it makes some sense ( at least much more than patents or copyright ) .Eh , you do n't know much about trademarks then .
In general , the more generic the word is , the harder it is to trademark and the less protection you get .
If you make up a word , that 's better .
If you have a non-obvious word , that 's also better.This is why you see businesses called " Kwik-E-Mart " instead of " Quick Market " , or " Pentium " CPUs instead of " 586s " ( even if the CPUID does say 586 on it ) .It does n't have anything to do with the ongoing abuse against the English language , though it certainly contributes to it.Capcha : Cohere</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So is "apple", would you name your new phone like that?Trademarks is all about registering common words for business purposes.
And it makes some sense (at least much more than patents or copyright).Eh, you don't know much about trademarks then.
In general, the more generic the word is, the harder it is to trademark and the less protection you get.
If you make up a word, that's better.
If you have a non-obvious word, that's also better.This is why you see businesses called "Kwik-E-Mart" instead of "Quick Market", or "Pentium" CPUs instead of "586s" (even if the CPUID does say 586 on it).It doesn't have anything to do with the ongoing abuse against the English language, though it certainly contributes to it.Capcha: Cohere
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681512</id>
	<title>do they choose the name 'dick' intentionally</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1262874840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for, they sure know how to behave like one as a family.</p><p>ah and, fuck trademarks. with this stupid mindset, in 50 years time we will run out of words and phrases to name things. and, given the possibility of infringing on someone's 'rights', we will probably be start refraining from using those words during ordinary talks in daily life.</p><p>this has to stop before it gets to that point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for , they sure know how to behave like one as a family.ah and , fuck trademarks .
with this stupid mindset , in 50 years time we will run out of words and phrases to name things .
and , given the possibility of infringing on someone 's 'rights ' , we will probably be start refraining from using those words during ordinary talks in daily life.this has to stop before it gets to that point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for, they sure know how to behave like one as a family.ah and, fuck trademarks.
with this stupid mindset, in 50 years time we will run out of words and phrases to name things.
and, given the possibility of infringing on someone's 'rights', we will probably be start refraining from using those words during ordinary talks in daily life.this has to stop before it gets to that point.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30685384</id>
	<title>Re:I Actually Side with Dick's Estate</title>
	<author>Target Practice</author>
	<datestamp>1262891820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who names their daughter Isa when their last name is Dick? Honestly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who names their daughter Isa when their last name is Dick ?
Honestly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who names their daughter Isa when their last name is Dick?
Honestly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681342</id>
	<title>Estate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262873580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Philip Dick has been dead for more than 20 years, time for his family to stop parasitizing on his success.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Philip Dick has been dead for more than 20 years , time for his family to stop parasitizing on his success .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Philip Dick has been dead for more than 20 years, time for his family to stop parasitizing on his success.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30687132</id>
	<title>Re:Estate</title>
	<author>Tellarin</author>
	<datestamp>1262856840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed.</p><p>On the other hand, the estate is only being a dick about the whole thing.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p><p>*ducks*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed.On the other hand , the estate is only being a dick about the whole thing .
: -P * ducks *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.On the other hand, the estate is only being a dick about the whole thing.
:-P*ducks*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681804</id>
	<title>What's in a name...</title>
	<author>neowolf</author>
	<datestamp>1262876640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's be serious- Google could have called this the Fuzz-Crap 4000 and would still make just as much money off of it.

The word "nexus" itself is descriptive of the device itself (look it up), so it is very conceivable that the word could have been used without any intent for it to be a homage to Dick's works. Whether intentional or unintentional- if it is seen as a homage to Dick's works- it would have generated more interest in them and would make the estate more money anyway. All calling the lawyers is going to do is bring about backlash, and that will primarily target the estate, not Google.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's be serious- Google could have called this the Fuzz-Crap 4000 and would still make just as much money off of it .
The word " nexus " itself is descriptive of the device itself ( look it up ) , so it is very conceivable that the word could have been used without any intent for it to be a homage to Dick 's works .
Whether intentional or unintentional- if it is seen as a homage to Dick 's works- it would have generated more interest in them and would make the estate more money anyway .
All calling the lawyers is going to do is bring about backlash , and that will primarily target the estate , not Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's be serious- Google could have called this the Fuzz-Crap 4000 and would still make just as much money off of it.
The word "nexus" itself is descriptive of the device itself (look it up), so it is very conceivable that the word could have been used without any intent for it to be a homage to Dick's works.
Whether intentional or unintentional- if it is seen as a homage to Dick's works- it would have generated more interest in them and would make the estate more money anyway.
All calling the lawyers is going to do is bring about backlash, and that will primarily target the estate, not Google.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684004</id>
	<title>Re:Corporate Darwinism</title>
	<author>Rich0</author>
	<datestamp>1262886300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> How Darwinian! In that sense,they are taking the role of parasite</i></p><p>Excellent analogy. <a href="http://people.smu.edu/eheise/Leucochloridium\_paradoxum.htm" title="smu.edu">This one</a> [smu.edu] in particular comes to mind.  There are several parasites which are known to induce behavior designed to get it eaten.  Toxoplasma is another one that comes to mind - it tends to make mice try to stand up for their rights against the mean cats.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How Darwinian !
In that sense,they are taking the role of parasiteExcellent analogy .
This one [ smu.edu ] in particular comes to mind .
There are several parasites which are known to induce behavior designed to get it eaten .
Toxoplasma is another one that comes to mind - it tends to make mice try to stand up for their rights against the mean cats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> How Darwinian!
In that sense,they are taking the role of parasiteExcellent analogy.
This one [smu.edu] in particular comes to mind.
There are several parasites which are known to induce behavior designed to get it eaten.
Toxoplasma is another one that comes to mind - it tends to make mice try to stand up for their rights against the mean cats.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366</id>
	<title>Obligatory comment on copyright</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262873760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Given that he has been dead for 28 years, his works should be in the public domain. Then there would be no dispute.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that he has been dead for 28 years , his works should be in the public domain .
Then there would be no dispute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given that he has been dead for 28 years, his works should be in the public domain.
Then there would be no dispute.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682926</id>
	<title>As An Aside...</title>
	<author>The Wild Norseman</author>
	<datestamp>1262882160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe this is the only time that a heterosexual man like myself can safely say, "yes, I like Dick."</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe this is the only time that a heterosexual man like myself can safely say , " yes , I like Dick .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe this is the only time that a heterosexual man like myself can safely say, "yes, I like Dick.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684276</id>
	<title>Whatever</title>
	<author>lymond01</author>
	<datestamp>1262887200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, sometimes when an obvious money grab comes to court, I wish the judge could hear a quick summary from both sides and then say, "Whatever...", bang his gavel, and dismiss it outright.  This is one of those times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , sometimes when an obvious money grab comes to court , I wish the judge could hear a quick summary from both sides and then say , " Whatever... " , bang his gavel , and dismiss it outright .
This is one of those times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, sometimes when an obvious money grab comes to court, I wish the judge could hear a quick summary from both sides and then say, "Whatever...", bang his gavel, and dismiss it outright.
This is one of those times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684108</id>
	<title>Re:I Actually Side with Dick's Estate</title>
	<author>lymond01</author>
	<datestamp>1262886660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's probably the Fark headline.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's probably the Fark headline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's probably the Fark headline.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681738</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>kinnell</author>
	<datestamp>1262876160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So is "apple", would you name your new phone like that?</p><p>Trademarks is all about registering common words for business purposes. And it makes some sense (at least much more than patents or copyright).</p></div><p>I think the issue here is that when they refer to a violation of their intellectual property rights, they mean copyright, not trademark.  You can trademark a common word, but you can't copyright it AFAIK.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So is " apple " , would you name your new phone like that ? Trademarks is all about registering common words for business purposes .
And it makes some sense ( at least much more than patents or copyright ) .I think the issue here is that when they refer to a violation of their intellectual property rights , they mean copyright , not trademark .
You can trademark a common word , but you ca n't copyright it AFAIK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So is "apple", would you name your new phone like that?Trademarks is all about registering common words for business purposes.
And it makes some sense (at least much more than patents or copyright).I think the issue here is that when they refer to a violation of their intellectual property rights, they mean copyright, not trademark.
You can trademark a common word, but you can't copyright it AFAIK.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683146</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory comment on copyright</title>
	<author>canajin56</author>
	<datestamp>1262883000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're not claiming copyright violation, they're claiming..."entitlement."  As in, "it's in daddy's book, that means I own it, mine mine mine mine mine mine mine mine mine!"  Which isn't a strong leg to stand on, legally speaking.  You can't copyright a word.  You can trademark "Nexus-6" or "Nexus One" but only in a particular field/fields, and you HAVE to produce a product in those fields or lose it.  As in, even if Philip K. Dick trademarked "Nexus-6"  for handheld electronic devices, he would have lost it long ago, because he doesn't make one!  You can't squat a trademark.  Further, I'd note that the estate doesn't hold the trademark at all, let alone on any form of electronic device!  That's why they never mention trademark in their press release.  Because Google hasn't done anything wrong, and they KNOW it.  They are calling it "IP theft", in hopes of riling up enough people that they can get a settlement.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're not claiming copyright violation , they 're claiming... " entitlement .
" As in , " it 's in daddy 's book , that means I own it , mine mine mine mine mine mine mine mine mine !
" Which is n't a strong leg to stand on , legally speaking .
You ca n't copyright a word .
You can trademark " Nexus-6 " or " Nexus One " but only in a particular field/fields , and you HAVE to produce a product in those fields or lose it .
As in , even if Philip K. Dick trademarked " Nexus-6 " for handheld electronic devices , he would have lost it long ago , because he does n't make one !
You ca n't squat a trademark .
Further , I 'd note that the estate does n't hold the trademark at all , let alone on any form of electronic device !
That 's why they never mention trademark in their press release .
Because Google has n't done anything wrong , and they KNOW it .
They are calling it " IP theft " , in hopes of riling up enough people that they can get a settlement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're not claiming copyright violation, they're claiming..."entitlement.
"  As in, "it's in daddy's book, that means I own it, mine mine mine mine mine mine mine mine mine!
"  Which isn't a strong leg to stand on, legally speaking.
You can't copyright a word.
You can trademark "Nexus-6" or "Nexus One" but only in a particular field/fields, and you HAVE to produce a product in those fields or lose it.
As in, even if Philip K. Dick trademarked "Nexus-6"  for handheld electronic devices, he would have lost it long ago, because he doesn't make one!
You can't squat a trademark.
Further, I'd note that the estate doesn't hold the trademark at all, let alone on any form of electronic device!
That's why they never mention trademark in their press release.
Because Google hasn't done anything wrong, and they KNOW it.
They are calling it "IP theft", in hopes of riling up enough people that they can get a settlement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682742</id>
	<title>Re:This is shameful</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1262881560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I do not have a problem with an author's children trying to assert their legal rights</i></p><p>I have a problem with an author's children HAVING those rights. The US Constitution is clear on this: "authord and inventors". Nobody else is supposed to hold copyright or patents.</p><p>I don't have a problem with his willing his estate to his children, but I have a problem with his copyrights being part of his estate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do not have a problem with an author 's children trying to assert their legal rightsI have a problem with an author 's children HAVING those rights .
The US Constitution is clear on this : " authord and inventors " .
Nobody else is supposed to hold copyright or patents.I do n't have a problem with his willing his estate to his children , but I have a problem with his copyrights being part of his estate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do not have a problem with an author's children trying to assert their legal rightsI have a problem with an author's children HAVING those rights.
The US Constitution is clear on this: "authord and inventors".
Nobody else is supposed to hold copyright or patents.I don't have a problem with his willing his estate to his children, but I have a problem with his copyrights being part of his estate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684070</id>
	<title>Re:I Actually Side with Dick's Estate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262886600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I think "Google rips off Dick heirs" works even better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I think " Google rips off Dick heirs " works even better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I think "Google rips off Dick heirs" works even better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684684</id>
	<title>This has nothing whatsoever to do with copyright.</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1262888880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>n/t</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>n/t</tokentext>
<sentencetext>n/t</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30687624</id>
	<title>Re:Another infringing greedy corporation?</title>
	<author>itsdapead</author>
	<datestamp>1262859180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They should be suing the Star Trek franchise as well for using the term Nexus in Generations.</p></div><p>They'd have to stand in line behind the estate of E.E. "Doc" Smith who, on that basis, should be owed something for "tractor beam" (and probably other space-opera jargon).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They should be suing the Star Trek franchise as well for using the term Nexus in Generations.They 'd have to stand in line behind the estate of E.E .
" Doc " Smith who , on that basis , should be owed something for " tractor beam " ( and probably other space-opera jargon ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should be suing the Star Trek franchise as well for using the term Nexus in Generations.They'd have to stand in line behind the estate of E.E.
"Doc" Smith who, on that basis, should be owed something for "tractor beam" (and probably other space-opera jargon).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681306</id>
	<title>Owning words</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262873400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get a grip. Back in the bad old barbarian days, before lawyers and corporate assholes roamed the earth, lots of people shared the exact same words. Really, it was quite commonplace to hear people talking, and see them writing, and they shared the exact same language, and it was fine. Nobody got bothered by it. Now I expect we'll all have to invent our own unique words.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get a grip .
Back in the bad old barbarian days , before lawyers and corporate assholes roamed the earth , lots of people shared the exact same words .
Really , it was quite commonplace to hear people talking , and see them writing , and they shared the exact same language , and it was fine .
Nobody got bothered by it .
Now I expect we 'll all have to invent our own unique words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get a grip.
Back in the bad old barbarian days, before lawyers and corporate assholes roamed the earth, lots of people shared the exact same words.
Really, it was quite commonplace to hear people talking, and see them writing, and they shared the exact same language, and it was fine.
Nobody got bothered by it.
Now I expect we'll all have to invent our own unique words.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30691406</id>
	<title>not a good pill</title>
	<author>cstacy</author>
	<datestamp>1262893200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't understand where this droid rage comes from.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand where this droid rage comes from .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand where this droid rage comes from.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681996</id>
	<title>Dick heirs are dicks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262877780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like PKD stories, but this is all BS. I hope they spend a lot of money and loose big. Now when Google markets the Nexus 6 model Android (cell phone), I'm on board with the suit. Until then they should stfu</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like PKD stories , but this is all BS .
I hope they spend a lot of money and loose big .
Now when Google markets the Nexus 6 model Android ( cell phone ) , I 'm on board with the suit .
Until then they should stfu</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like PKD stories, but this is all BS.
I hope they spend a lot of money and loose big.
Now when Google markets the Nexus 6 model Android (cell phone), I'm on board with the suit.
Until then they should stfu</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682016</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1262877900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No, but I might name a brand of beach towels Apple, or ski boots, and what exactly would Apple Inc. or Apple Corps Ltd (remember them?) do about it?</p></div><p>Sue the shit out of you. And win, because they have more money. Or did you forget that Apple Corps sued Apple Computer back in the day and won a settlement that kept Apple Computer out of the music business until the latter Apple had enough money to tell the former Apple to screw off?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but I might name a brand of beach towels Apple , or ski boots , and what exactly would Apple Inc. or Apple Corps Ltd ( remember them ?
) do about it ? Sue the shit out of you .
And win , because they have more money .
Or did you forget that Apple Corps sued Apple Computer back in the day and won a settlement that kept Apple Computer out of the music business until the latter Apple had enough money to tell the former Apple to screw off ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but I might name a brand of beach towels Apple, or ski boots, and what exactly would Apple Inc. or Apple Corps Ltd (remember them?
) do about it?Sue the shit out of you.
And win, because they have more money.
Or did you forget that Apple Corps sued Apple Computer back in the day and won a settlement that kept Apple Computer out of the music business until the latter Apple had enough money to tell the former Apple to screw off?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681416</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>Internal Modem</author>
	<datestamp>1262874120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nexus-6 is in the dictionary?</p><p>How were you marked insightful?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nexus-6 is in the dictionary ? How were you marked insightful ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nexus-6 is in the dictionary?How were you marked insightful?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682000</id>
	<title>Confusingly Similar</title>
	<author>Sloppy</author>
	<datestamp>1262877840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought I was buying a character from a book,  but when I opened the box, it had a <em>phone</em> in it!  Damn Google and their cheap counterfeit knockoffs.</p><p>I mean, sure, from the pictures I admit that before I bought it, it <em>looked</em> like it might be a phone, but it also looked like it could be PKD's professional output too.  I mean, Google and PKD operate in essentially the same market, selling the same sort of goods and services, so how the hell is someone supposed to know this isn't a PKD product?  I really thought I was buying a character, and and so disappointed to end up with a phone that is almost <em>nothing</em> like what I read about in the book. It's so confusing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought I was buying a character from a book , but when I opened the box , it had a phone in it !
Damn Google and their cheap counterfeit knockoffs.I mean , sure , from the pictures I admit that before I bought it , it looked like it might be a phone , but it also looked like it could be PKD 's professional output too .
I mean , Google and PKD operate in essentially the same market , selling the same sort of goods and services , so how the hell is someone supposed to know this is n't a PKD product ?
I really thought I was buying a character , and and so disappointed to end up with a phone that is almost nothing like what I read about in the book .
It 's so confusing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought I was buying a character from a book,  but when I opened the box, it had a phone in it!
Damn Google and their cheap counterfeit knockoffs.I mean, sure, from the pictures I admit that before I bought it, it looked like it might be a phone, but it also looked like it could be PKD's professional output too.
I mean, Google and PKD operate in essentially the same market, selling the same sort of goods and services, so how the hell is someone supposed to know this isn't a PKD product?
I really thought I was buying a character, and and so disappointed to end up with a phone that is almost nothing like what I read about in the book.
It's so confusing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682418</id>
	<title>who says?</title>
	<author>farble1670</author>
	<datestamp>1262880000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>google has never made claimed homage to mr. dick. the word nexus does have a meaning beyond an imaginary android product line,</p><ol>
	<li>a form of connection</li><li>a connected group</li><li>the center of something</li></ol><p>claiming that &quot;nexus&quot; even refers to mr. dick's book seems weak to me. it's been a long time since i read the book, but i don't recall it referring specifically to anything called a &quot;nexus one&quot;. it refers to the &quot;nexus line&quot; of androids, and specifically the &quot;nexus 6&quot; model.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>google has never made claimed homage to mr. dick. the word nexus does have a meaning beyond an imaginary android product line , a form of connectiona connected groupthe center of somethingclaiming that " nexus " even refers to mr. dick 's book seems weak to me .
it 's been a long time since i read the book , but i do n't recall it referring specifically to anything called a " nexus one " .
it refers to the " nexus line " of androids , and specifically the " nexus 6 " model .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>google has never made claimed homage to mr. dick. the word nexus does have a meaning beyond an imaginary android product line,
	a form of connectiona connected groupthe center of somethingclaiming that "nexus" even refers to mr. dick's book seems weak to me.
it's been a long time since i read the book, but i don't recall it referring specifically to anything called a "nexus one".
it refers to the "nexus line" of androids, and specifically the "nexus 6" model.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30688098</id>
	<title>Re:This is shameful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262861700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Are book sales going to be affected ?</p></div><p>Yes, they will likely sell many books solely because of this ill-gotten publicity.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are book sales going to be affected ? Yes , they will likely sell many books solely because of this ill-gotten publicity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are book sales going to be affected ?Yes, they will likely sell many books solely because of this ill-gotten publicity.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683244</id>
	<title>Re:Too Far</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262883360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>  Two, Philip's heirs should not earn ongoing profits from work done by Philip a generation ago.  Has their income incentivized them to produce anything noteworthy themselves?  I think not; in direct contradiction to the whole point of congress's authority to assign limited monopolies.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It might not have incentivized his heirs, but it could have incentived him knowing that his children may be able to live comfortably when he is gone...</p></div></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Two , Philip 's heirs should not earn ongoing profits from work done by Philip a generation ago .
Has their income incentivized them to produce anything noteworthy themselves ?
I think not ; in direct contradiction to the whole point of congress 's authority to assign limited monopolies.It might not have incentivized his heirs , but it could have incentived him knowing that his children may be able to live comfortably when he is gone.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  Two, Philip's heirs should not earn ongoing profits from work done by Philip a generation ago.
Has their income incentivized them to produce anything noteworthy themselves?
I think not; in direct contradiction to the whole point of congress's authority to assign limited monopolies.It might not have incentivized his heirs, but it could have incentived him knowing that his children may be able to live comfortably when he is gone...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681298</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686342</id>
	<title>Re:Estate</title>
	<author>NiteShaed</author>
	<datestamp>1262896440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>By continuing to operate the family is still providing new services</p></div></blockquote><p>Do they?  They didn't create the hotels, or the company that operates the hotels, and Conrad died.  Why not have the entire thing "revert to the public domain" when he died?  Make it a non-profit corporation, after all, his family is literally engaging in "rent seeking behavior", sitting on the company that Conrad Hilton created and collecting rent from the people who stay there.  Let Paris start her own hotel-chain and build it up from the ground, instead of this parasitic behaviour of living off the work of her family.</p><p>Of course, all of this is absurd, I side with the creator of a given work.  If and when you create something of value, you're free to give it to the public if you want, but the idea that nobody else can decide that for themselves arrogant.</p><p>In the case of art and literature, why do we have to separate physical and intellectual property?  I'd argue that the intellectual property is far more personal, and far more "wholly owned" by a creator of a given work than a building that was built by someone whose chief contribution to the project was money.  The fact that the creator of this work chooses to share it with the public for a price doesn't change the fact that it's his work, and if he wishes to leave a legacy for his family after he's gone, who are we, as a society, to tell him he can't, and that once he's gone everything he's done has to be given away for free?  If we don't want to pay the price to read those works, then we can simply not read them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>By continuing to operate the family is still providing new servicesDo they ?
They did n't create the hotels , or the company that operates the hotels , and Conrad died .
Why not have the entire thing " revert to the public domain " when he died ?
Make it a non-profit corporation , after all , his family is literally engaging in " rent seeking behavior " , sitting on the company that Conrad Hilton created and collecting rent from the people who stay there .
Let Paris start her own hotel-chain and build it up from the ground , instead of this parasitic behaviour of living off the work of her family.Of course , all of this is absurd , I side with the creator of a given work .
If and when you create something of value , you 're free to give it to the public if you want , but the idea that nobody else can decide that for themselves arrogant.In the case of art and literature , why do we have to separate physical and intellectual property ?
I 'd argue that the intellectual property is far more personal , and far more " wholly owned " by a creator of a given work than a building that was built by someone whose chief contribution to the project was money .
The fact that the creator of this work chooses to share it with the public for a price does n't change the fact that it 's his work , and if he wishes to leave a legacy for his family after he 's gone , who are we , as a society , to tell him he ca n't , and that once he 's gone everything he 's done has to be given away for free ?
If we do n't want to pay the price to read those works , then we can simply not read them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By continuing to operate the family is still providing new servicesDo they?
They didn't create the hotels, or the company that operates the hotels, and Conrad died.
Why not have the entire thing "revert to the public domain" when he died?
Make it a non-profit corporation, after all, his family is literally engaging in "rent seeking behavior", sitting on the company that Conrad Hilton created and collecting rent from the people who stay there.
Let Paris start her own hotel-chain and build it up from the ground, instead of this parasitic behaviour of living off the work of her family.Of course, all of this is absurd, I side with the creator of a given work.
If and when you create something of value, you're free to give it to the public if you want, but the idea that nobody else can decide that for themselves arrogant.In the case of art and literature, why do we have to separate physical and intellectual property?
I'd argue that the intellectual property is far more personal, and far more "wholly owned" by a creator of a given work than a building that was built by someone whose chief contribution to the project was money.
The fact that the creator of this work chooses to share it with the public for a price doesn't change the fact that it's his work, and if he wishes to leave a legacy for his family after he's gone, who are we, as a society, to tell him he can't, and that once he's gone everything he's done has to be given away for free?
If we don't want to pay the price to read those works, then we can simply not read them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682278</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681496</id>
	<title>Good luck</title>
	<author>MikeRT</author>
	<datestamp>1262874660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think they're going to have a hard time making that case since so few people will make the connection. Dick is not one of those authors whose works are so familiar to the general public that there is likely to be any mental connection between the average person visiting a T-Mobile store and thinking about buying an Android phone and Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they 're going to have a hard time making that case since so few people will make the connection .
Dick is not one of those authors whose works are so familiar to the general public that there is likely to be any mental connection between the average person visiting a T-Mobile store and thinking about buying an Android phone and Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they're going to have a hard time making that case since so few people will make the connection.
Dick is not one of those authors whose works are so familiar to the general public that there is likely to be any mental connection between the average person visiting a T-Mobile store and thinking about buying an Android phone and Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684230</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>lymond01</author>
	<datestamp>1262887080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So is "apple", would you name your new phone like that?</i></p><p>Gods yes.  Think of the free marketing!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So is " apple " , would you name your new phone like that ? Gods yes .
Think of the free marketing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So is "apple", would you name your new phone like that?Gods yes.
Think of the free marketing!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681492</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory comment on copyright</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262874660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is not true.  This book was first published in 1968 so it will be 95 years after the publication date.  Source:  <a href="http://copyright.cornell.edu/resources/publicdomain.cfm" title="cornell.edu" rel="nofollow">http://copyright.cornell.edu/resources/publicdomain.cfm</a> [cornell.edu]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is not true .
This book was first published in 1968 so it will be 95 years after the publication date .
Source : http : //copyright.cornell.edu/resources/publicdomain.cfm [ cornell.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is not true.
This book was first published in 1968 so it will be 95 years after the publication date.
Source:  http://copyright.cornell.edu/resources/publicdomain.cfm [cornell.edu]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682496</id>
	<title>Re:This is shameful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262880360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People will buy Google's phone no matter what they call it. If Nexus One is a reference or tribute to Philip K. Dick, it will only help sales of Philip K. Dick material.</p><p>The author's children are shooting themselves in the foot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People will buy Google 's phone no matter what they call it .
If Nexus One is a reference or tribute to Philip K. Dick , it will only help sales of Philip K. Dick material.The author 's children are shooting themselves in the foot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People will buy Google's phone no matter what they call it.
If Nexus One is a reference or tribute to Philip K. Dick, it will only help sales of Philip K. Dick material.The author's children are shooting themselves in the foot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683646</id>
	<title>Bothersome</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1262884860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was wondering about this.</p><p>Does anyone else think its particularly interesting that Google picked a theming for Android (eg. Android, Nexus, etc.) from a dystopian state-run future?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was wondering about this.Does anyone else think its particularly interesting that Google picked a theming for Android ( eg .
Android , Nexus , etc .
) from a dystopian state-run future ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was wondering about this.Does anyone else think its particularly interesting that Google picked a theming for Android (eg.
Android, Nexus, etc.
) from a dystopian state-run future?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682232</id>
	<title>Re:I Actually Side with Dick's Estate</title>
	<author>metamatic</author>
	<datestamp>1262878920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Yes, the headline should read - Google rips off Dick.</p></div></blockquote><p>Ah, but then they'd have to deal with a business process patent from Mr Wongburger.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , the headline should read - Google rips off Dick.Ah , but then they 'd have to deal with a business process patent from Mr Wongburger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, the headline should read - Google rips off Dick.Ah, but then they'd have to deal with a business process patent from Mr Wongburger.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30694344</id>
	<title>This is simply rediculous</title>
	<author>aceofspades1217</author>
	<datestamp>1262965920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>His family should be honored that a company as big as google decided to make a reference to one of their father/grandfather's books in the name of their flagship product. I mean this is ridiculous that the copyright machine representing the family would be trying to do this.</p><p>So what, now every time someone makes references to a character in a novel they can be sued.</p><p>Thirty Seconds to Mars has a song called Stranger In a Strange Land and I haven't seen the Heinlein foundation get upset over them using a trademarked (its the book's actual title) phrase.</p><p>Cmon, what these Sci-Fi writers really wanted was to make a lasting impression on the world and the foundations representing their estates should be more interested in that rather than just trying to make money on every little reference made.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>His family should be honored that a company as big as google decided to make a reference to one of their father/grandfather 's books in the name of their flagship product .
I mean this is ridiculous that the copyright machine representing the family would be trying to do this.So what , now every time someone makes references to a character in a novel they can be sued.Thirty Seconds to Mars has a song called Stranger In a Strange Land and I have n't seen the Heinlein foundation get upset over them using a trademarked ( its the book 's actual title ) phrase.Cmon , what these Sci-Fi writers really wanted was to make a lasting impression on the world and the foundations representing their estates should be more interested in that rather than just trying to make money on every little reference made .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His family should be honored that a company as big as google decided to make a reference to one of their father/grandfather's books in the name of their flagship product.
I mean this is ridiculous that the copyright machine representing the family would be trying to do this.So what, now every time someone makes references to a character in a novel they can be sued.Thirty Seconds to Mars has a song called Stranger In a Strange Land and I haven't seen the Heinlein foundation get upset over them using a trademarked (its the book's actual title) phrase.Cmon, what these Sci-Fi writers really wanted was to make a lasting impression on the world and the foundations representing their estates should be more interested in that rather than just trying to make money on every little reference made.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681672</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory comment on copyright</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262875800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you misunderstand the sense in which GP was using 'should'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you misunderstand the sense in which GP was using 'should' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you misunderstand the sense in which GP was using 'should'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683904</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck the estate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262885940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You do realize that if the standard for copyright is the life of the copyright holder. It would literally put a price on the copyright holders head. A predetermined time avoids this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do realize that if the standard for copyright is the life of the copyright holder .
It would literally put a price on the copyright holders head .
A predetermined time avoids this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do realize that if the standard for copyright is the life of the copyright holder.
It would literally put a price on the copyright holders head.
A predetermined time avoids this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683420</id>
	<title>Re:This is shameful</title>
	<author>StarsAreAlsoFire</author>
	<datestamp>1262884020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Are book sales going to be affected ?"<br><br>Yes. I would imagine that a measurable increase in sales will be seen, correlating to this media noise.<br><br>If I were cynical, I would say that the estate probably has no actual intention of suing, they are just milking the PR for all it's worth.<br><br>The estate probably has no actual intention of suing, they are just milking the PR for all it's worth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Are book sales going to be affected ? " Yes .
I would imagine that a measurable increase in sales will be seen , correlating to this media noise.If I were cynical , I would say that the estate probably has no actual intention of suing , they are just milking the PR for all it 's worth.The estate probably has no actual intention of suing , they are just milking the PR for all it 's worth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Are book sales going to be affected ?"Yes.
I would imagine that a measurable increase in sales will be seen, correlating to this media noise.If I were cynical, I would say that the estate probably has no actual intention of suing, they are just milking the PR for all it's worth.The estate probably has no actual intention of suing, they are just milking the PR for all it's worth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686148</id>
	<title>Sue Blizzard too</title>
	<author>teko\_teko</author>
	<datestamp>1262895300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They can also sue Blizzard for using <a href="http://starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Nexus" title="wikia.com">Nexus in Starcraft</a> [wikia.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They can also sue Blizzard for using Nexus in Starcraft [ wikia.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can also sue Blizzard for using Nexus in Starcraft [wikia.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681886</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1262877120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are plenty of products with the word Apple. For example, <a href="http://www.ciao.co.uk/Tesco\_Value\_Pure\_Apple\_Juice\_\_5325278" title="ciao.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.ciao.co.uk/Tesco\_Value\_Pure\_Apple\_Juice\_\_5325278</a> [ciao.co.uk] .</p><p><i>Trademarks is all about registering common words for business purposes</i><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...in a specific market.</p><p>You can't just use a word and then claim no one else is allowed to use it! Otherwise I'm claiming owner to all the words in this post. Your reply isn't allowed to use any of them<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are plenty of products with the word Apple .
For example , http : //www.ciao.co.uk/Tesco \ _Value \ _Pure \ _Apple \ _Juice \ _ \ _5325278 [ ciao.co.uk ] .Trademarks is all about registering common words for business purposes ...in a specific market.You ca n't just use a word and then claim no one else is allowed to use it !
Otherwise I 'm claiming owner to all the words in this post .
Your reply is n't allowed to use any of them : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are plenty of products with the word Apple.
For example, http://www.ciao.co.uk/Tesco\_Value\_Pure\_Apple\_Juice\_\_5325278 [ciao.co.uk] .Trademarks is all about registering common words for business purposes ...in a specific market.You can't just use a word and then claim no one else is allowed to use it!
Otherwise I'm claiming owner to all the words in this post.
Your reply isn't allowed to use any of them :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684856</id>
	<title>PKD is a funny man</title>
	<author>dr. chuck bunsen</author>
	<datestamp>1262889540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I love the humor of Phillip K. Dick, I mean, come on, he even named his daughter Isa Dick.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I love the humor of Phillip K. Dick , I mean , come on , he even named his daughter Isa Dick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love the humor of Phillip K. Dick, I mean, come on, he even named his daughter Isa Dick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684218</id>
	<title>Re:I Actually Side with Dick's Estate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262887020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's obvious how this one is going to end. Google will have Dick by the balls.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's obvious how this one is going to end .
Google will have Dick by the balls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's obvious how this one is going to end.
Google will have Dick by the balls.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30693372</id>
	<title>And yet again, someone with Mod points....</title>
	<author>NiteShaed</author>
	<datestamp>1262960520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...thinks "troll" mods are for posts they disagree with.  If someone can clearly explain to me how I was trolling Wonko, I'll happily apologize, but I don't see a single thing in that post that's anything other than an opposing viewpoint to what he said.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...thinks " troll " mods are for posts they disagree with .
If someone can clearly explain to me how I was trolling Wonko , I 'll happily apologize , but I do n't see a single thing in that post that 's anything other than an opposing viewpoint to what he said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...thinks "troll" mods are for posts they disagree with.
If someone can clearly explain to me how I was trolling Wonko, I'll happily apologize, but I don't see a single thing in that post that's anything other than an opposing viewpoint to what he said.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683678</id>
	<title>Re:This is shameful</title>
	<author>kellyb9</author>
	<datestamp>1262884980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a great point. I've never heard of Philip Dick or his book unfortunantly. It seems like it would be right down my alley, and I may actually read it based on Google's tribute.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a great point .
I 've never heard of Philip Dick or his book unfortunantly .
It seems like it would be right down my alley , and I may actually read it based on Google 's tribute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a great point.
I've never heard of Philip Dick or his book unfortunantly.
It seems like it would be right down my alley, and I may actually read it based on Google's tribute.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683272</id>
	<title>Somehow...</title>
	<author>snadsnad</author>
	<datestamp>1262883540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...I don't think Google's business strategy for this device was to cash in on the swarms of Philip K. Dick fans to make or break this item's success.  If anything it is a homage but I don't think they're it is to make a significant sales impact because "Oh oh oh a new phone with vague allusions to a novel I like has been released so I better get that phone".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...I do n't think Google 's business strategy for this device was to cash in on the swarms of Philip K. Dick fans to make or break this item 's success .
If anything it is a homage but I do n't think they 're it is to make a significant sales impact because " Oh oh oh a new phone with vague allusions to a novel I like has been released so I better get that phone " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I don't think Google's business strategy for this device was to cash in on the swarms of Philip K. Dick fans to make or break this item's success.
If anything it is a homage but I don't think they're it is to make a significant sales impact because "Oh oh oh a new phone with vague allusions to a novel I like has been released so I better get that phone".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682078</id>
	<title>If they sell billions and billions of them...</title>
	<author>sjdude</author>
	<datestamp>1262878140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they sell billions and billions of them, maybe they could change the name to "Sagan"... Oh, wait a minute...</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they sell billions and billions of them , maybe they could change the name to " Sagan " ... Oh , wait a minute.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they sell billions and billions of them, maybe they could change the name to "Sagan"... Oh, wait a minute...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682922</id>
	<title>See Dicks sue...</title>
	<author>Phizzle</author>
	<datestamp>1262882160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>Dont act like Dicks!</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dont act like Dicks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dont act like Dicks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681532</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory comment on copyright</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262874960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We must protect the creators so they can creator more work, particularly post death. Even though you would expect companies^W people to sit still until a cash cow dries up doing exactly the opposite of what copyright is supposed to help with. By extending copyright and ensuring some creators are rewarded, we're still enjoying a plethora of new works from PKD, Elvis, Lennon.</p><p>Seriously, this typifies exactly where copyright has failed. Who are these people? They didn't create any of the titles, have no idea what was in PKD's head (or what he was smoking) when he penned them, yet they get large amounts of cash for all his work and movie rights. It's worse that Kraftwerk's army of lawyers looking for blip and beep samples in tracks in the 80s and 90s, when all the band had to do was write a few more tracks to make a lot more money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We must protect the creators so they can creator more work , particularly post death .
Even though you would expect companies ^ W people to sit still until a cash cow dries up doing exactly the opposite of what copyright is supposed to help with .
By extending copyright and ensuring some creators are rewarded , we 're still enjoying a plethora of new works from PKD , Elvis , Lennon.Seriously , this typifies exactly where copyright has failed .
Who are these people ?
They did n't create any of the titles , have no idea what was in PKD 's head ( or what he was smoking ) when he penned them , yet they get large amounts of cash for all his work and movie rights .
It 's worse that Kraftwerk 's army of lawyers looking for blip and beep samples in tracks in the 80s and 90s , when all the band had to do was write a few more tracks to make a lot more money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We must protect the creators so they can creator more work, particularly post death.
Even though you would expect companies^W people to sit still until a cash cow dries up doing exactly the opposite of what copyright is supposed to help with.
By extending copyright and ensuring some creators are rewarded, we're still enjoying a plethora of new works from PKD, Elvis, Lennon.Seriously, this typifies exactly where copyright has failed.
Who are these people?
They didn't create any of the titles, have no idea what was in PKD's head (or what he was smoking) when he penned them, yet they get large amounts of cash for all his work and movie rights.
It's worse that Kraftwerk's army of lawyers looking for blip and beep samples in tracks in the 80s and 90s, when all the band had to do was write a few more tracks to make a lot more money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684788</id>
	<title>Re:Estate</title>
	<author>clifyt</author>
	<datestamp>1262889300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Allowing heirs to sit on this "property" indefinitely does not surve this purpose."</p><p>Why not?  I have a friend that died a few years ago, and one of the last things he did was to finish a large work who's real purpose wasn't to cement his status in history but because the work was so well noted that while he was actively dying, he was able to negotiate a MUCH better contract so his children could be properly taken care of.</p><p>I know he would have rather spent more time with his kids than working, but their long term wellbeing was much more important to him.  Disagree with what might have been more important for his kids or not, but the fact that the law sided with him was the entire reason he wrote the last work.  And as such, it most certainly served the purposes as intended.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Allowing heirs to sit on this " property " indefinitely does not surve this purpose .
" Why not ?
I have a friend that died a few years ago , and one of the last things he did was to finish a large work who 's real purpose was n't to cement his status in history but because the work was so well noted that while he was actively dying , he was able to negotiate a MUCH better contract so his children could be properly taken care of.I know he would have rather spent more time with his kids than working , but their long term wellbeing was much more important to him .
Disagree with what might have been more important for his kids or not , but the fact that the law sided with him was the entire reason he wrote the last work .
And as such , it most certainly served the purposes as intended .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Allowing heirs to sit on this "property" indefinitely does not surve this purpose.
"Why not?
I have a friend that died a few years ago, and one of the last things he did was to finish a large work who's real purpose wasn't to cement his status in history but because the work was so well noted that while he was actively dying, he was able to negotiate a MUCH better contract so his children could be properly taken care of.I know he would have rather spent more time with his kids than working, but their long term wellbeing was much more important to him.
Disagree with what might have been more important for his kids or not, but the fact that the law sided with him was the entire reason he wrote the last work.
And as such, it most certainly served the purposes as intended.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682278</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681734</id>
	<title>How about this...</title>
	<author>RevWaldo</author>
	<datestamp>1262876160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Free digital copy of "Blade Runner" with every Nexus One (director's cut, of course). Google gets to demo the phones' video chops and gets the coolness cred, PKD's heirs get a chunk of the royalties. Win-win.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Free digital copy of " Blade Runner " with every Nexus One ( director 's cut , of course ) .
Google gets to demo the phones ' video chops and gets the coolness cred , PKD 's heirs get a chunk of the royalties .
Win-win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free digital copy of "Blade Runner" with every Nexus One (director's cut, of course).
Google gets to demo the phones' video chops and gets the coolness cred, PKD's heirs get a chunk of the royalties.
Win-win.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681556</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262875140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Apple" is a registered trademark. "Nexus" was never trademarked by Dick or his family.<br>"Apple" is the name of an entire company. "Nexus" was the name of a fictional model of android in a novel.<br>Labeling a consumer electronic device with "Apple" is likely to cause consumer confusion as to who made the product. Labeling anything "Nexus" might produce a few chuckles, but not even a moron in a hurry will think that Dick's family made that product.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Apple " is a registered trademark .
" Nexus " was never trademarked by Dick or his family .
" Apple " is the name of an entire company .
" Nexus " was the name of a fictional model of android in a novel.Labeling a consumer electronic device with " Apple " is likely to cause consumer confusion as to who made the product .
Labeling anything " Nexus " might produce a few chuckles , but not even a moron in a hurry will think that Dick 's family made that product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Apple" is a registered trademark.
"Nexus" was never trademarked by Dick or his family.
"Apple" is the name of an entire company.
"Nexus" was the name of a fictional model of android in a novel.Labeling a consumer electronic device with "Apple" is likely to cause consumer confusion as to who made the product.
Labeling anything "Nexus" might produce a few chuckles, but not even a moron in a hurry will think that Dick's family made that product.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681632</id>
	<title>Corporate Darwinism</title>
	<author>zuki</author>
	<datestamp>1262875620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Without wanting to add too much to the anti-copyright vituperations, has anyone considered how difficult it must truly be for a lawyer sensing a great case such as this one, with hundreds of billable hours (regardless of the outcome) to refrain themselves from telling their clients that serving papers to one of the planet's largest corporate behemoths is the only option, when in reality they pretty much know that they are guaranteed to lose the case <i>but will still manage to milk the estate for  plenty of money by going that route</i>, and that this will be the closest they'll ever come to being 'cool with the in crowd' ? <br> <br>
How Darwinian! In that sense,they are taking the role of parasite, which as we all know is necessary for the ecosystem to function properly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Without wanting to add too much to the anti-copyright vituperations , has anyone considered how difficult it must truly be for a lawyer sensing a great case such as this one , with hundreds of billable hours ( regardless of the outcome ) to refrain themselves from telling their clients that serving papers to one of the planet 's largest corporate behemoths is the only option , when in reality they pretty much know that they are guaranteed to lose the case but will still manage to milk the estate for plenty of money by going that route , and that this will be the closest they 'll ever come to being 'cool with the in crowd ' ?
How Darwinian !
In that sense,they are taking the role of parasite , which as we all know is necessary for the ecosystem to function properly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without wanting to add too much to the anti-copyright vituperations, has anyone considered how difficult it must truly be for a lawyer sensing a great case such as this one, with hundreds of billable hours (regardless of the outcome) to refrain themselves from telling their clients that serving papers to one of the planet's largest corporate behemoths is the only option, when in reality they pretty much know that they are guaranteed to lose the case but will still manage to milk the estate for  plenty of money by going that route, and that this will be the closest they'll ever come to being 'cool with the in crowd' ?
How Darwinian!
In that sense,they are taking the role of parasite, which as we all know is necessary for the ecosystem to function properly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>vagabond\_gr</author>
	<datestamp>1262874480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So is "apple", would you name your new phone like that?</p><p>Trademarks is all about registering common words for business purposes. And it makes some sense (at least much more than patents or copyright).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So is " apple " , would you name your new phone like that ? Trademarks is all about registering common words for business purposes .
And it makes some sense ( at least much more than patents or copyright ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So is "apple", would you name your new phone like that?Trademarks is all about registering common words for business purposes.
And it makes some sense (at least much more than patents or copyright).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681328</id>
	<title>It is generic word</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262873460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/android" title="reference.com" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/android</a> [reference.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //dictionary.reference.com/browse/android [ reference.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/android [reference.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30687724</id>
	<title>Re:How about this...</title>
	<author>itsdapead</author>
	<datestamp>1262859780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Free digital copy of "Blade Runner" with every Nexus One (director's cut, of course). Google gets to demo the phones' video chops and gets the coolness cred, <b>Warner Bros</b> get a chunk of the royalties.</p></div><p>(Put that right for you)
</p><p>If they wanted to reference the book, they could include some themed Apps: Voight-Kampf, empathy box ("all it does is show this bloke trying to climb out of a hole - but it makes me feel sad"), Mood Organ (Setting #259: the urge to Google "porn" and click on all the sponsored links) and a casual game where you have to catch falling goats.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Free digital copy of " Blade Runner " with every Nexus One ( director 's cut , of course ) .
Google gets to demo the phones ' video chops and gets the coolness cred , Warner Bros get a chunk of the royalties .
( Put that right for you ) If they wanted to reference the book , they could include some themed Apps : Voight-Kampf , empathy box ( " all it does is show this bloke trying to climb out of a hole - but it makes me feel sad " ) , Mood Organ ( Setting # 259 : the urge to Google " porn " and click on all the sponsored links ) and a casual game where you have to catch falling goats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free digital copy of "Blade Runner" with every Nexus One (director's cut, of course).
Google gets to demo the phones' video chops and gets the coolness cred, Warner Bros get a chunk of the royalties.
(Put that right for you)
If they wanted to reference the book, they could include some themed Apps: Voight-Kampf, empathy box ("all it does is show this bloke trying to climb out of a hole - but it makes me feel sad"), Mood Organ (Setting #259: the urge to Google "porn" and click on all the sponsored links) and a casual game where you have to catch falling goats.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684058</id>
	<title>Well, it makes sense</title>
	<author>Dirtside</author>
	<datestamp>1262886480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right, because when coming up with a name for its futuristic, intelligent smartphone, they thought it would be a good idea to evoke HOMICIDAL ROBOTS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right , because when coming up with a name for its futuristic , intelligent smartphone , they thought it would be a good idea to evoke HOMICIDAL ROBOTS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right, because when coming up with a name for its futuristic, intelligent smartphone, they thought it would be a good idea to evoke HOMICIDAL ROBOTS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290</id>
	<title>Seriously though...</title>
	<author>RedMountain</author>
	<datestamp>1262873280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a freaking WORD. It comes from the DICTIONARY.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a freaking WORD .
It comes from the DICTIONARY .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a freaking WORD.
It comes from the DICTIONARY.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683428</id>
	<title>Re:In this post I now copyright...</title>
	<author>cerberusss</author>
	<datestamp>1262884080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm now copyrighting NEXUS TWO, NEXUS THREE and NEXUS FOUR by using these in my post.</p></div><p>You idiot. Google of course sticks to the One True Versioning Scheme: the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Naked\_Gun" title="wikipedia.org">Naked Gun</a> [wikipedia.org] versioning scheme. The next version will be the:<br>Google Nexus 2 1/2<br>Google Nexus 33 1/3</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm now copyrighting NEXUS TWO , NEXUS THREE and NEXUS FOUR by using these in my post.You idiot .
Google of course sticks to the One True Versioning Scheme : the Naked Gun [ wikipedia.org ] versioning scheme .
The next version will be the : Google Nexus 2 1/2Google Nexus 33 1/3</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm now copyrighting NEXUS TWO, NEXUS THREE and NEXUS FOUR by using these in my post.You idiot.
Google of course sticks to the One True Versioning Scheme: the Naked Gun [wikipedia.org] versioning scheme.
The next version will be the:Google Nexus 2 1/2Google Nexus 33 1/3
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681740</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262876220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dunno apple aint a great example as they started a music store even though apple (record label) already existed and they had a prior agreement not to. What does that show? Well other than that apple are dicks, it's a perfect example of use the same trademark in two different markets without any problems (see also Linux the detergent)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dunno apple aint a great example as they started a music store even though apple ( record label ) already existed and they had a prior agreement not to .
What does that show ?
Well other than that apple are dicks , it 's a perfect example of use the same trademark in two different markets without any problems ( see also Linux the detergent )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dunno apple aint a great example as they started a music store even though apple (record label) already existed and they had a prior agreement not to.
What does that show?
Well other than that apple are dicks, it's a perfect example of use the same trademark in two different markets without any problems (see also Linux the detergent)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682082</id>
	<title>They'll really love Googles new e-store...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262878200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The Tannhauser Gate", for all things Android! Please park near the C beams, just off the shoulder of Orion!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Tannhauser Gate " , for all things Android !
Please park near the C beams , just off the shoulder of Orion !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Tannhauser Gate", for all things Android!
Please park near the C beams, just off the shoulder of Orion!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681868</id>
	<title>Explicating the inexplicable</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262877000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am the Nexus One. - well duh<br>I want more life, !@#$\%^, I ain't done YET - this is a coded reference to Dick's copyright and parasitical earnings<br>Prophetic?  Pathetic?  Oh yes</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am the Nexus One .
- well duhI want more life , !
@ # $ \ % ^ , I ai n't done YET - this is a coded reference to Dick 's copyright and parasitical earningsProphetic ?
Pathetic ? Oh yes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am the Nexus One.
- well duhI want more life, !
@#$\%^, I ain't done YET - this is a coded reference to Dick's copyright and parasitical earningsProphetic?
Pathetic?  Oh yes</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682104</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory comment on copyright</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1262878260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
bradley13 wrote (paraphrase): Copyright should last 28 years.
</p><p>
operand wrote (paraphrase): Copyright currently happens to last 95 years.
</p><p>
So, operand, do you agree with the 105th Congress's rationale for setting the U.S. copyright term? If so, why?
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>bradley13 wrote ( paraphrase ) : Copyright should last 28 years .
operand wrote ( paraphrase ) : Copyright currently happens to last 95 years .
So , operand , do you agree with the 105th Congress 's rationale for setting the U.S. copyright term ?
If so , why ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
bradley13 wrote (paraphrase): Copyright should last 28 years.
operand wrote (paraphrase): Copyright currently happens to last 95 years.
So, operand, do you agree with the 105th Congress's rationale for setting the U.S. copyright term?
If so, why?
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30685146</id>
	<title>Re:This is shameful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262890860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is Google really profiting or abusing Dick's IP ?</p></div><p>This isn't the first time Google has co-opted an existing name.  Chrome is ripped from Mozilla "chrome://" URLs.  Google Go was obviously purposely named that in spite of the existing Go! language (or many people at Google are absurdly incompetent at search).</p><p>The real issue here is that Google is obviously at the "we're big and untouchable" stage of their monopoly, like Microsoft was in the 90s and IBM before that.  So I support this suit, because until Google realizes there are checks on its power they will continue being corrupted by it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is Google really profiting or abusing Dick 's IP ? This is n't the first time Google has co-opted an existing name .
Chrome is ripped from Mozilla " chrome : // " URLs .
Google Go was obviously purposely named that in spite of the existing Go !
language ( or many people at Google are absurdly incompetent at search ) .The real issue here is that Google is obviously at the " we 're big and untouchable " stage of their monopoly , like Microsoft was in the 90s and IBM before that .
So I support this suit , because until Google realizes there are checks on its power they will continue being corrupted by it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is Google really profiting or abusing Dick's IP ?This isn't the first time Google has co-opted an existing name.
Chrome is ripped from Mozilla "chrome://" URLs.
Google Go was obviously purposely named that in spite of the existing Go!
language (or many people at Google are absurdly incompetent at search).The real issue here is that Google is obviously at the "we're big and untouchable" stage of their monopoly, like Microsoft was in the 90s and IBM before that.
So I support this suit, because until Google realizes there are checks on its power they will continue being corrupted by it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681528</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262874900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So is "apple", would you name your new phone like that?</p></div></blockquote><p>No, but I might name a brand of beach towels Apple, or ski boots, and what exactly would Apple Inc. or Apple Corps Ltd (remember them?) do about it?</p><blockquote><div><p>Trademarks is all about registering common words for <b>specific</b> business purposes.</p></div></blockquote><p>There, fixed that for you.  To clarify, and I'll type this really slowly to make it easy for you to understand: a novel is not a phone.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So is " apple " , would you name your new phone like that ? No , but I might name a brand of beach towels Apple , or ski boots , and what exactly would Apple Inc. or Apple Corps Ltd ( remember them ?
) do about it ? Trademarks is all about registering common words for specific business purposes.There , fixed that for you .
To clarify , and I 'll type this really slowly to make it easy for you to understand : a novel is not a phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So is "apple", would you name your new phone like that?No, but I might name a brand of beach towels Apple, or ski boots, and what exactly would Apple Inc. or Apple Corps Ltd (remember them?
) do about it?Trademarks is all about registering common words for specific business purposes.There, fixed that for you.
To clarify, and I'll type this really slowly to make it easy for you to understand: a novel is not a phone.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684570</id>
	<title>This is just sad...</title>
	<author>nilbog</author>
	<datestamp>1262888460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's sad that Philip K. Dick's children would tarnish his good name by bringing forward this obviously frivolous lawsuit.</p><p>Let's all remember the man by reading his books, but forget his children by checking them out from this online library instead of buying them: <a href="http://www.kickasstorrents.com/philip-k-dick-collection-47-ebooks-t2589210.html" title="kickasstorrents.com">http://www.kickasstorrents.com/philip-k-dick-collection-47-ebooks-t2589210.html</a> [kickasstorrents.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's sad that Philip K. Dick 's children would tarnish his good name by bringing forward this obviously frivolous lawsuit.Let 's all remember the man by reading his books , but forget his children by checking them out from this online library instead of buying them : http : //www.kickasstorrents.com/philip-k-dick-collection-47-ebooks-t2589210.html [ kickasstorrents.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's sad that Philip K. Dick's children would tarnish his good name by bringing forward this obviously frivolous lawsuit.Let's all remember the man by reading his books, but forget his children by checking them out from this online library instead of buying them: http://www.kickasstorrents.com/philip-k-dick-collection-47-ebooks-t2589210.html [kickasstorrents.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682390</id>
	<title>Re:Good luck</title>
	<author>Khelder</author>
	<datestamp>1262879820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree. I think his heirs really have an inflated sense of his presence. I've seen Blade Runner multiple times and am a big sci fi fan, and my first thought when I saw a headline saying Nexus One might infringe on something of Dick's was "Huh?" Even when the connection to Blade Runner was made, I still had no idea. Virtually nobody remembers the name "nexus" in connection to Dick's work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
I think his heirs really have an inflated sense of his presence .
I 've seen Blade Runner multiple times and am a big sci fi fan , and my first thought when I saw a headline saying Nexus One might infringe on something of Dick 's was " Huh ?
" Even when the connection to Blade Runner was made , I still had no idea .
Virtually nobody remembers the name " nexus " in connection to Dick 's work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
I think his heirs really have an inflated sense of his presence.
I've seen Blade Runner multiple times and am a big sci fi fan, and my first thought when I saw a headline saying Nexus One might infringe on something of Dick's was "Huh?
" Even when the connection to Blade Runner was made, I still had no idea.
Virtually nobody remembers the name "nexus" in connection to Dick's work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682438</id>
	<title>What about these guys?</title>
	<author>Simulant</author>
	<datestamp>1262880120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://refx.com/" title="refx.com">http://refx.com/</a> [refx.com]

While their Nexus 1 was referred to as simply Nexus (or Nexus 1.x)  Their Nexus 2 is Nexus^2.
Maybe Google just needs to cube it.

Great synth, btw</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //refx.com/ [ refx.com ] While their Nexus 1 was referred to as simply Nexus ( or Nexus 1.x ) Their Nexus 2 is Nexus ^ 2 .
Maybe Google just needs to cube it .
Great synth , btw</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://refx.com/ [refx.com]

While their Nexus 1 was referred to as simply Nexus (or Nexus 1.x)  Their Nexus 2 is Nexus^2.
Maybe Google just needs to cube it.
Great synth, btw</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683884</id>
	<title>Re:In related news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262885880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Asimov was cremated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Asimov was cremated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Asimov was cremated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681354</id>
	<title>It appears someone is living up to their name.</title>
	<author>Dog-Cow</author>
	<datestamp>1262873700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The children are dicks.  In the vernacular sense of the term.</p><p>I hope that if this makes it to trial that the judge slaps them with billions in fines for bringing a frivolous suit.</p><p>For even thinking they have a case, they deserve to lose every penny they own.  I truly hope someone just shoots them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The children are dicks .
In the vernacular sense of the term.I hope that if this makes it to trial that the judge slaps them with billions in fines for bringing a frivolous suit.For even thinking they have a case , they deserve to lose every penny they own .
I truly hope someone just shoots them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The children are dicks.
In the vernacular sense of the term.I hope that if this makes it to trial that the judge slaps them with billions in fines for bringing a frivolous suit.For even thinking they have a case, they deserve to lose every penny they own.
I truly hope someone just shoots them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683748</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck the estate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262885340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or, google could come up with something new and original, instead of living up to what we've all been worried they're becoming...the New M$. The don't create anything new and they buy up other companies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , google could come up with something new and original , instead of living up to what we 've all been worried they 're becoming...the New M $ .
The do n't create anything new and they buy up other companies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, google could come up with something new and original, instead of living up to what we've all been worried they're becoming...the New M$.
The don't create anything new and they buy up other companies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683148</id>
	<title>Apple v Apple?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262883000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean like:</p><p>Apple the computer / electronics / software company v Apple the music label (The Beatles)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean like : Apple the computer / electronics / software company v Apple the music label ( The Beatles )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean like:Apple the computer / electronics / software company v Apple the music label (The Beatles)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30690936</id>
	<title>Electric Sheep screensaver</title>
	<author>mattr</author>
	<datestamp>1262886240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is sheer stupidity on the side of the PKD estate. If they would just shut up, they might be contacted by Google for some neat comarketing thing. But noooo.</p><p>Perhaps the Nexus One is inspired not by PKD but by the science of nexialism from General Semantics as explained by A. E. Van Vogt.<br><a href="http://www.thespiritof76.com/NEX\_NEWS/NN\_WHAT.HTM" title="thespiritof76.com">link 1</a> [thespiritof76.com] <a href="http://www.nexialism.info/" title="nexialism.info">link 2</a> [nexialism.info]</p><p>Here's a question. The <a href="http://community.electricsheep.org/" title="electricsheep.org">Electric Sheep Screensaver</a> [electricsheep.org] is a distributed fractal movie calculation engine which is pretty cool and the name comes from PKD's title "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep" (the alternate title of Bladerunner IIRC). So if they tried to make money at it would the esteemed, stupid estate try to sue them too? If a literary work produces strong memes that become part of mainstream culture, which seems to be one of the goals of a writer in general, then is it ethical for the writer to try to control how people use that meme?</p><p>My impression (without reading TFA) is the estate wants a judicial finding that Google is trying to associate their product with a work of PKD's and reap some extra cash through that association. The association might be true but the reference is so obscure, and Google makes no attempt to mention PKD. The word used of itself is still in the realm of mainstream language and there are many other science fiction (and other) usages of "android" and "nexus". The estate hears everything through a filter of being a PKD expert but it is not conclusive that Google was taking advantage of them.</p><p>Next question: If the branding person at Google admits the android and nexus names were homages to PKD, then is the estate justified in suing? This is the main legal question. Unless Google tries to leverage it by use of additional imagery or text from PKD works, such that the use of the name is not an homage but a hook into the creative asset of the estate, I think not. But I'm not a lawyer. I think Google could get away with it if they stop picking PKD words to use as product names in the future.</p><p>As for the screensaver, I have no idea what the answer is. It's free but what about T-shirts? (the ones they sell don't say "electric sheep").<br>Actually it is neat that they call individual fractals "sheep" too. At this point I think we are talking about the culture taking possession of a meme and the original author is no longer involved with it. (i.e. you could make a t-shirt that says "Get Sheep" on it, I'd expect).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is sheer stupidity on the side of the PKD estate .
If they would just shut up , they might be contacted by Google for some neat comarketing thing .
But noooo.Perhaps the Nexus One is inspired not by PKD but by the science of nexialism from General Semantics as explained by A. E. Van Vogt.link 1 [ thespiritof76.com ] link 2 [ nexialism.info ] Here 's a question .
The Electric Sheep Screensaver [ electricsheep.org ] is a distributed fractal movie calculation engine which is pretty cool and the name comes from PKD 's title " Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep " ( the alternate title of Bladerunner IIRC ) .
So if they tried to make money at it would the esteemed , stupid estate try to sue them too ?
If a literary work produces strong memes that become part of mainstream culture , which seems to be one of the goals of a writer in general , then is it ethical for the writer to try to control how people use that meme ? My impression ( without reading TFA ) is the estate wants a judicial finding that Google is trying to associate their product with a work of PKD 's and reap some extra cash through that association .
The association might be true but the reference is so obscure , and Google makes no attempt to mention PKD .
The word used of itself is still in the realm of mainstream language and there are many other science fiction ( and other ) usages of " android " and " nexus " .
The estate hears everything through a filter of being a PKD expert but it is not conclusive that Google was taking advantage of them.Next question : If the branding person at Google admits the android and nexus names were homages to PKD , then is the estate justified in suing ?
This is the main legal question .
Unless Google tries to leverage it by use of additional imagery or text from PKD works , such that the use of the name is not an homage but a hook into the creative asset of the estate , I think not .
But I 'm not a lawyer .
I think Google could get away with it if they stop picking PKD words to use as product names in the future.As for the screensaver , I have no idea what the answer is .
It 's free but what about T-shirts ?
( the ones they sell do n't say " electric sheep " ) .Actually it is neat that they call individual fractals " sheep " too .
At this point I think we are talking about the culture taking possession of a meme and the original author is no longer involved with it .
( i.e. you could make a t-shirt that says " Get Sheep " on it , I 'd expect ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is sheer stupidity on the side of the PKD estate.
If they would just shut up, they might be contacted by Google for some neat comarketing thing.
But noooo.Perhaps the Nexus One is inspired not by PKD but by the science of nexialism from General Semantics as explained by A. E. Van Vogt.link 1 [thespiritof76.com] link 2 [nexialism.info]Here's a question.
The Electric Sheep Screensaver [electricsheep.org] is a distributed fractal movie calculation engine which is pretty cool and the name comes from PKD's title "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep" (the alternate title of Bladerunner IIRC).
So if they tried to make money at it would the esteemed, stupid estate try to sue them too?
If a literary work produces strong memes that become part of mainstream culture, which seems to be one of the goals of a writer in general, then is it ethical for the writer to try to control how people use that meme?My impression (without reading TFA) is the estate wants a judicial finding that Google is trying to associate their product with a work of PKD's and reap some extra cash through that association.
The association might be true but the reference is so obscure, and Google makes no attempt to mention PKD.
The word used of itself is still in the realm of mainstream language and there are many other science fiction (and other) usages of "android" and "nexus".
The estate hears everything through a filter of being a PKD expert but it is not conclusive that Google was taking advantage of them.Next question: If the branding person at Google admits the android and nexus names were homages to PKD, then is the estate justified in suing?
This is the main legal question.
Unless Google tries to leverage it by use of additional imagery or text from PKD works, such that the use of the name is not an homage but a hook into the creative asset of the estate, I think not.
But I'm not a lawyer.
I think Google could get away with it if they stop picking PKD words to use as product names in the future.As for the screensaver, I have no idea what the answer is.
It's free but what about T-shirts?
(the ones they sell don't say "electric sheep").Actually it is neat that they call individual fractals "sheep" too.
At this point I think we are talking about the culture taking possession of a meme and the original author is no longer involved with it.
(i.e. you could make a t-shirt that says "Get Sheep" on it, I'd expect).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30687322</id>
	<title>Re:I Actually Side with Dick's Estate</title>
	<author>itsdapead</author>
	<datestamp>1262857740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yes, the headline should read - Google rips off Dick.</p></div><p>What? and face lawsuits from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John\_and\_Lorena\_Bobbitt" title="wikipedia.org">Bobbit</a> [wikipedia.org] estate?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , the headline should read - Google rips off Dick.What ?
and face lawsuits from the Bobbit [ wikipedia.org ] estate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, the headline should read - Google rips off Dick.What?
and face lawsuits from the Bobbit [wikipedia.org] estate?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686578</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory comment on copyright</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262897520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So lets assume that his works are in the public domain, what do you suppose really changes?  This lawsuit is silly, granted, but as far as the books themselves go, currently a copy of "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep" goes for about $8 or $9 for a paperback.  Lets say $1.50 of that goes to his estate.  If it were to become public domain tomorrow, the price will still be about $8 or $9, but the publisher then gets to keep the extra $1.50, completely cutting out anyone who actually has any connection whatsoever to Philip K. Dick.  Is it really so important around here that the author's family get nothing from these sales, and that the publishers get even more than they already do?  Why?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So lets assume that his works are in the public domain , what do you suppose really changes ?
This lawsuit is silly , granted , but as far as the books themselves go , currently a copy of " Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep " goes for about $ 8 or $ 9 for a paperback .
Lets say $ 1.50 of that goes to his estate .
If it were to become public domain tomorrow , the price will still be about $ 8 or $ 9 , but the publisher then gets to keep the extra $ 1.50 , completely cutting out anyone who actually has any connection whatsoever to Philip K. Dick. Is it really so important around here that the author 's family get nothing from these sales , and that the publishers get even more than they already do ?
Why ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So lets assume that his works are in the public domain, what do you suppose really changes?
This lawsuit is silly, granted, but as far as the books themselves go, currently a copy of "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep" goes for about $8 or $9 for a paperback.
Lets say $1.50 of that goes to his estate.
If it were to become public domain tomorrow, the price will still be about $8 or $9, but the publisher then gets to keep the extra $1.50, completely cutting out anyone who actually has any connection whatsoever to Philip K. Dick.  Is it really so important around here that the author's family get nothing from these sales, and that the publishers get even more than they already do?
Why?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682510</id>
	<title>Isa Dick, Alright</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262880420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have to admire Philip's foresight in naming his daughter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have to admire Philip 's foresight in naming his daughter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have to admire Philip's foresight in naming his daughter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30690030</id>
	<title>Re:I Actually Side with Dick's Estate</title>
	<author>initialE</author>
	<datestamp>1262875260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OT, but do you know of anyone named Dick anymore? Like Elvis and Adolf, it's no longer a name mothers would choose for their children.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OT , but do you know of anyone named Dick anymore ?
Like Elvis and Adolf , it 's no longer a name mothers would choose for their children .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OT, but do you know of anyone named Dick anymore?
Like Elvis and Adolf, it's no longer a name mothers would choose for their children.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683910</id>
	<title>I read a book once with a character named "Kindle"</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1262885940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll let the author know that he should sue Amazon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll let the author know that he should sue Amazon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll let the author know that he should sue Amazon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683052</id>
	<title>So how does Ridley Scott feel?</title>
	<author>szquirrel</author>
	<datestamp>1262882700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" is a wretched book. Nobody but the hardest-core SF geek would give a shit about it today if David Peoples and Ridley Scott hadn't turned it into a movie that was 100x better. So just who is riding who's coattails?</p><p>It's not as if only PKD's brilliant, visionary mind could have come up with putting a number after the word "nexus" to make a cool-sounding name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep ?
" is a wretched book .
Nobody but the hardest-core SF geek would give a shit about it today if David Peoples and Ridley Scott had n't turned it into a movie that was 100x better .
So just who is riding who 's coattails ? It 's not as if only PKD 's brilliant , visionary mind could have come up with putting a number after the word " nexus " to make a cool-sounding name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
" is a wretched book.
Nobody but the hardest-core SF geek would give a shit about it today if David Peoples and Ridley Scott hadn't turned it into a movie that was 100x better.
So just who is riding who's coattails?It's not as if only PKD's brilliant, visionary mind could have come up with putting a number after the word "nexus" to make a cool-sounding name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682018</id>
	<title>Leaches...</title>
	<author>miffo.swe</author>
	<datestamp>1262877900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First of all, since when do the estate sell something or protect something called "Nexus One", "Android" or something at all with a name that resembles those two?</p><p>Someone getting inspired by a book are not supposed to pay for the inspiration other than having bought the damn book. This is just some assholes trying to get money.</p><p>Android is an old latin word of andro- "human" + eides "form, shape. Nexus translates to connection or center and is also a latin word. It wouldnt even been a problem if Mr. Dick had invented the names himself but its just old words that happens to be in his books like "him", "her", "greedy" or "obnoxious".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First of all , since when do the estate sell something or protect something called " Nexus One " , " Android " or something at all with a name that resembles those two ? Someone getting inspired by a book are not supposed to pay for the inspiration other than having bought the damn book .
This is just some assholes trying to get money.Android is an old latin word of andro- " human " + eides " form , shape .
Nexus translates to connection or center and is also a latin word .
It wouldnt even been a problem if Mr. Dick had invented the names himself but its just old words that happens to be in his books like " him " , " her " , " greedy " or " obnoxious " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First of all, since when do the estate sell something or protect something called "Nexus One", "Android" or something at all with a name that resembles those two?Someone getting inspired by a book are not supposed to pay for the inspiration other than having bought the damn book.
This is just some assholes trying to get money.Android is an old latin word of andro- "human" + eides "form, shape.
Nexus translates to connection or center and is also a latin word.
It wouldnt even been a problem if Mr. Dick had invented the names himself but its just old words that happens to be in his books like "him", "her", "greedy" or "obnoxious".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683934</id>
	<title>Why didn't the estate sue Cisco?</title>
	<author>HockeyPuck</author>
	<datestamp>1262886060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does the estate have to defend their trademark/name against all threats?  Or can they just pick and choose what they defend it against?  They're suing Google, but why didn't they sue Cisco? Cisco had a Nexus product (actually quite a few of them) for a few years now:</p><p><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9402/index.html" title="cisco.com">Nexus 7000</a> [cisco.com]<br><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9670/index.html" title="cisco.com">Nexus 5000</a> [cisco.com]<br><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10110/" title="cisco.com">Nexus 2000</a> [cisco.com]<br><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9902/" title="cisco.com">Nexus 1000</a> [cisco.com]</p><p>Hell, the government even has <a href="http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/trusted\_traveler/nexus\_prog/" title="cbp.gov">Nexus Cards</a> [cbp.gov] which are are WHTI-compliant documents for land and sea travel, as well as air travel when traveling to and from airports using the NEXUS program, and provide expedited travel via land, air or sea to approved members between the U.S. and Canada border.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does the estate have to defend their trademark/name against all threats ?
Or can they just pick and choose what they defend it against ?
They 're suing Google , but why did n't they sue Cisco ?
Cisco had a Nexus product ( actually quite a few of them ) for a few years now : Nexus 7000 [ cisco.com ] Nexus 5000 [ cisco.com ] Nexus 2000 [ cisco.com ] Nexus 1000 [ cisco.com ] Hell , the government even has Nexus Cards [ cbp.gov ] which are are WHTI-compliant documents for land and sea travel , as well as air travel when traveling to and from airports using the NEXUS program , and provide expedited travel via land , air or sea to approved members between the U.S. and Canada border .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does the estate have to defend their trademark/name against all threats?
Or can they just pick and choose what they defend it against?
They're suing Google, but why didn't they sue Cisco?
Cisco had a Nexus product (actually quite a few of them) for a few years now:Nexus 7000 [cisco.com]Nexus 5000 [cisco.com]Nexus 2000 [cisco.com]Nexus 1000 [cisco.com]Hell, the government even has Nexus Cards [cbp.gov] which are are WHTI-compliant documents for land and sea travel, as well as air travel when traveling to and from airports using the NEXUS program, and provide expedited travel via land, air or sea to approved members between the U.S. and Canada border.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682760</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>Low Ranked Craig</author>
	<datestamp>1262881620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has anyone considered that this may have nothing at all to do with PKD?  The definitions of Nexus are: </p><ul> <li>link: the means of connection between things linked in series</li><li>A connected series or group</li></ul><p>Seems pretty obvious to me that Nexus is a good name for a convergence device.</p><p>
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;hs=MIF&amp;defl=en&amp;q=define:nexus&amp;ei=3\_pFS4q6JYPYM93L7fkC&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=glossary\_definition&amp;ct=title&amp;ved=0CAwQkAE" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Lots of nexus references, although these results ARE from Google...</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone considered that this may have nothing at all to do with PKD ?
The definitions of Nexus are : link : the means of connection between things linked in seriesA connected series or groupSeems pretty obvious to me that Nexus is a good name for a convergence device .
Lots of nexus references , although these results ARE from Google... [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone considered that this may have nothing at all to do with PKD?
The definitions of Nexus are:  link: the means of connection between things linked in seriesA connected series or groupSeems pretty obvious to me that Nexus is a good name for a convergence device.
Lots of nexus references, although these results ARE from Google... [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682956</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously though...</title>
	<author>jo\_ham</author>
	<datestamp>1262882280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can apply for a trademark that covers all uses - like Woolworths Australia did for their new logo that looked a little bit like Apple's, who then sought legal protection to prevent them from obtaining the trademark in the computer sector since it may conflict with them.</p><p>Trademark applications are not always specific.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can apply for a trademark that covers all uses - like Woolworths Australia did for their new logo that looked a little bit like Apple 's , who then sought legal protection to prevent them from obtaining the trademark in the computer sector since it may conflict with them.Trademark applications are not always specific .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can apply for a trademark that covers all uses - like Woolworths Australia did for their new logo that looked a little bit like Apple's, who then sought legal protection to prevent them from obtaining the trademark in the computer sector since it may conflict with them.Trademark applications are not always specific.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474</id>
	<title>This is shameful</title>
	<author>genmax</author>
	<datestamp>1262874540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The people on whom the connection is not lost, would see this as a tribute from Google to Philip K. Dick. It would be sad if this sort of unbridled greed on the part of some discourages companies and people from expressing their admiration for the contributions of others.</p><p>I do not have a problem with an author's children trying to assert their legal rights --- but this would've been as wrong if the author himself had talked about suing. There is really no reason, legal or otherwise, for Google to be paying money to the Dick foundation. Trademark laws do not apply here. And, does anyone think the name is going to "help" Nexus / Android sales ? Or that there will be people who will buy the nexus thinking it is a Dick novel ? Is Google really profiting or abusing Dick's IP ? Are book sales going to be affected ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The people on whom the connection is not lost , would see this as a tribute from Google to Philip K. Dick. It would be sad if this sort of unbridled greed on the part of some discourages companies and people from expressing their admiration for the contributions of others.I do not have a problem with an author 's children trying to assert their legal rights --- but this would 've been as wrong if the author himself had talked about suing .
There is really no reason , legal or otherwise , for Google to be paying money to the Dick foundation .
Trademark laws do not apply here .
And , does anyone think the name is going to " help " Nexus / Android sales ?
Or that there will be people who will buy the nexus thinking it is a Dick novel ?
Is Google really profiting or abusing Dick 's IP ?
Are book sales going to be affected ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The people on whom the connection is not lost, would see this as a tribute from Google to Philip K. Dick. It would be sad if this sort of unbridled greed on the part of some discourages companies and people from expressing their admiration for the contributions of others.I do not have a problem with an author's children trying to assert their legal rights --- but this would've been as wrong if the author himself had talked about suing.
There is really no reason, legal or otherwise, for Google to be paying money to the Dick foundation.
Trademark laws do not apply here.
And, does anyone think the name is going to "help" Nexus / Android sales ?
Or that there will be people who will buy the nexus thinking it is a Dick novel ?
Is Google really profiting or abusing Dick's IP ?
Are book sales going to be affected ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30691226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30687724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30687322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30693372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30691938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30689786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30685384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686578
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30685068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30687164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30688098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30685146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30692030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30687624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30690030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30687132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30685466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683598
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30690178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30690756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0314220_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30691226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681416
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681464
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681886
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681526
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681556
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681528
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682956
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682016
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30687164
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681738
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683148
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684230
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681740
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30685466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682298
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682416
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30691938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30690178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683748
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682390
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30685068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30687724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30692030
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682752
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30685146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30688098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30690756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682742
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681238
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684070
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30690030
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684108
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682452
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681948
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686222
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684218
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682232
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30685384
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30687322
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681306
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681668
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681804
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30689786
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30687132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682036
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682278
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684788
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686342
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30693372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30687624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683086
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681492
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682048
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681672
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30682104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30686578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30684684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30683146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681532
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0314220.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0314220.30681480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
