<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_04_037209</id>
	<title>World's Tallest Building To Open Monday</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1262629320000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>dtmos writes <i>"The <a href="http://www.burjdubaiskyscraper.com/">Burj Dubai</a> ('Dubai Tower' in Arabic) is <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704065404574636323803224360.html?mod=googlenews\_wsj">scheduled to open to the public on Monday</a>.  Its <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worlds\_tallest\_building">height</a>, claimed to be 824.55m (2,705.2 feet), but believed to be 818m (2,684 feet) &mdash; either way, more than half a mile &mdash; makes it far taller than Taiwan's <a href="http://www.taipei-101.com.tw/index\_en.htm">Taipei 101</a>, which had been the world's tallest skyscraper at 509m (1,670 feet)."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>dtmos writes " The Burj Dubai ( 'Dubai Tower ' in Arabic ) is scheduled to open to the public on Monday .
Its height , claimed to be 824.55m ( 2,705.2 feet ) , but believed to be 818m ( 2,684 feet )    either way , more than half a mile    makes it far taller than Taiwan 's Taipei 101 , which had been the world 's tallest skyscraper at 509m ( 1,670 feet ) .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dtmos writes "The Burj Dubai ('Dubai Tower' in Arabic) is scheduled to open to the public on Monday.
Its height, claimed to be 824.55m (2,705.2 feet), but believed to be 818m (2,684 feet) — either way, more than half a mile — makes it far taller than Taiwan's Taipei 101, which had been the world's tallest skyscraper at 509m (1,670 feet).
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30645496</id>
	<title>Re:Space occupied by elevators</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1262597100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
<i>How tall can a building be built before all the space gets eaten up by elevator shafts?</i>
</p><p>
That's the real problem. The World Trade Center towers had "sky lobbies", with big express elevators to
intermediate floors, and local elevators from there. Local elevator shafts could then be above each other.
</p><p>
The World Trade Center was unique in that all the floors were the same size.  Most other tall buildings are  pointy, so the higher floors are smaller and traffic to the top is less.  Burj Dubai is also residential on the higher floors, so the people density and traffic for the upper floors is low.
</p><p>
Elevator speeds are limited by the rate at which people can stand air pressure changes. Tapei 101 has pressurized elevators, so they can fine-tune the rate of pressure change. It's not clear if Burj Dubai does; if they don't, they'll probably have to slow down the higher elevators to reduce resident complaints.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How tall can a building be built before all the space gets eaten up by elevator shafts ?
That 's the real problem .
The World Trade Center towers had " sky lobbies " , with big express elevators to intermediate floors , and local elevators from there .
Local elevator shafts could then be above each other .
The World Trade Center was unique in that all the floors were the same size .
Most other tall buildings are pointy , so the higher floors are smaller and traffic to the top is less .
Burj Dubai is also residential on the higher floors , so the people density and traffic for the upper floors is low .
Elevator speeds are limited by the rate at which people can stand air pressure changes .
Tapei 101 has pressurized elevators , so they can fine-tune the rate of pressure change .
It 's not clear if Burj Dubai does ; if they do n't , they 'll probably have to slow down the higher elevators to reduce resident complaints .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
How tall can a building be built before all the space gets eaten up by elevator shafts?
That's the real problem.
The World Trade Center towers had "sky lobbies", with big express elevators to
intermediate floors, and local elevators from there.
Local elevator shafts could then be above each other.
The World Trade Center was unique in that all the floors were the same size.
Most other tall buildings are  pointy, so the higher floors are smaller and traffic to the top is less.
Burj Dubai is also residential on the higher floors, so the people density and traffic for the upper floors is low.
Elevator speeds are limited by the rate at which people can stand air pressure changes.
Tapei 101 has pressurized elevators, so they can fine-tune the rate of pressure change.
It's not clear if Burj Dubai does; if they don't, they'll probably have to slow down the higher elevators to reduce resident complaints.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638392</id>
	<title>Re:Great timing</title>
	<author>jcr</author>
	<datestamp>1262638740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>About two years late for that, actually.</p><p>-jcr</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>About two years late for that , actually.-jcr</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About two years late for that, actually.-jcr</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30640444</id>
	<title>CHECK FOR VIRUS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262619660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>THIS ADDRESS HAS MALWARE-----++++++++1/4/2010 6:32:42 AM    Deleted    Trojan program Trojan-Downloader.JS.Agent.ewi    C:\Users\Dennis\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Low\Content.IE5\IO58EOL8\infolinks\_main[1].js</p><p>*****http://www.burjdubaiskyscraper.com/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>THIS ADDRESS HAS MALWARE----- + + + + + + + + 1/4/2010 6 : 32 : 42 AM Deleted Trojan program Trojan-Downloader.JS.Agent.ewi C : \ Users \ Dennis \ AppData \ Local \ Microsoft \ Windows \ Temporary Internet Files \ Low \ Content.IE5 \ IO58EOL8 \ infolinks \ _main [ 1 ] .js * * * * * http : //www.burjdubaiskyscraper.com/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>THIS ADDRESS HAS MALWARE-----++++++++1/4/2010 6:32:42 AM    Deleted    Trojan program Trojan-Downloader.JS.Agent.ewi    C:\Users\Dennis\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Low\Content.IE5\IO58EOL8\infolinks\_main[1].js*****http://www.burjdubaiskyscraper.com/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638470</id>
	<title>Re:Great timing</title>
	<author>Jeeeb</author>
	<datestamp>1262596620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Construction hubris and economic crash seem to be close companions.</i> <br> <br>

Come on think about it for a bit. They didn't build this in the last few months. Burj Dubai was started during an economic boom. I doubt anyone was predicting that it would be completed in an economic crash.<br> <br>

Although you are right about construction and economic downturn going hand in hand. It's a great way for government to keep people employed reducing discontent. It can potentially have some follow through stimulus effects. It can be seen as a form of investment. I.e. the infrastructure has future value (generally speaking).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Construction hubris and economic crash seem to be close companions .
Come on think about it for a bit .
They did n't build this in the last few months .
Burj Dubai was started during an economic boom .
I doubt anyone was predicting that it would be completed in an economic crash .
Although you are right about construction and economic downturn going hand in hand .
It 's a great way for government to keep people employed reducing discontent .
It can potentially have some follow through stimulus effects .
It can be seen as a form of investment .
I.e. the infrastructure has future value ( generally speaking ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Construction hubris and economic crash seem to be close companions.
Come on think about it for a bit.
They didn't build this in the last few months.
Burj Dubai was started during an economic boom.
I doubt anyone was predicting that it would be completed in an economic crash.
Although you are right about construction and economic downturn going hand in hand.
It's a great way for government to keep people employed reducing discontent.
It can potentially have some follow through stimulus effects.
It can be seen as a form of investment.
I.e. the infrastructure has future value (generally speaking).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30644396</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>drsquare</author>
	<datestamp>1262635800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually medium-density is best. Cycling or walking half a mile is better than travelling half a mile in an electric elevator. Residents of Dubai have no interest in public transport; that's for poor people. Pristine outdoor spaces? Ha. The outdoor spaces are basically sand and sewage, and the Western ex-pats and emiratis won't be seen dead in anything other than an expensive car.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually medium-density is best .
Cycling or walking half a mile is better than travelling half a mile in an electric elevator .
Residents of Dubai have no interest in public transport ; that 's for poor people .
Pristine outdoor spaces ?
Ha. The outdoor spaces are basically sand and sewage , and the Western ex-pats and emiratis wo n't be seen dead in anything other than an expensive car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually medium-density is best.
Cycling or walking half a mile is better than travelling half a mile in an electric elevator.
Residents of Dubai have no interest in public transport; that's for poor people.
Pristine outdoor spaces?
Ha. The outdoor spaces are basically sand and sewage, and the Western ex-pats and emiratis won't be seen dead in anything other than an expensive car.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638532</id>
	<title>Must offer a great view</title>
	<author>Snufu</author>
	<datestamp>1262597580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>of the financial bust below.<br>

<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/02/eveningnews/main4696300.shtml" title="cbsnews.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/02/eveningnews/main4696300.shtml</a> [cbsnews.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>of the financial bust below .
http : //www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/02/eveningnews/main4696300.shtml [ cbsnews.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of the financial bust below.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/02/eveningnews/main4696300.shtml [cbsnews.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30641848</id>
	<title>Re:Holes, not poles.</title>
	<author>dwye</author>
	<datestamp>1262625240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; So I say, build better deep buildings (holes), not tall towers of concrete (poles).</p><p>Thank you, Durin.</p><p>I keep telling the other players in my D&amp;D group to build a delving, not a tower, but do they ever listen? NOOO!</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (just keeping this News For Nerds, and not CNBC) (alas, that means no Erin Burnett, as well)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; So I say , build better deep buildings ( holes ) , not tall towers of concrete ( poles ) .Thank you , Durin.I keep telling the other players in my D&amp;D group to build a delving , not a tower , but do they ever listen ?
NOOO !         ( just keeping this News For Nerds , and not CNBC ) ( alas , that means no Erin Burnett , as well )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; So I say, build better deep buildings (holes), not tall towers of concrete (poles).Thank you, Durin.I keep telling the other players in my D&amp;D group to build a delving, not a tower, but do they ever listen?
NOOO!
        (just keeping this News For Nerds, and not CNBC) (alas, that means no Erin Burnett, as well)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30649966</id>
	<title>Re:And this changes what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262617260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which is probably why they are empty.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is probably why they are empty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is probably why they are empty.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638382</id>
	<title>Does anybody else.....?</title>
	<author>zerospeaks</author>
	<datestamp>1262638620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does anyone else suddenly feel the urge to play SimTower?   Is it just me?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone else suddenly feel the urge to play SimTower ?
Is it just me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone else suddenly feel the urge to play SimTower?
Is it just me?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638038</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262547600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>tell that to my backyard.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>tell that to my backyard.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tell that to my backyard.....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638886</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262603040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Supply and demand, ever heard of that? Building higher reduces demand for land, which reduces its price.</p><p>Of course, it might increase right next to the high-rises, but that's another issue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Supply and demand , ever heard of that ?
Building higher reduces demand for land , which reduces its price.Of course , it might increase right next to the high-rises , but that 's another issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Supply and demand, ever heard of that?
Building higher reduces demand for land, which reduces its price.Of course, it might increase right next to the high-rises, but that's another issue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30640336</id>
	<title>World's Tallest Building To Open Monday</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262619000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kaspersky AV when going to <a href="http://www.burjdubaiskyscraper.com/" title="burjdubaiskyscraper.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.burjdubaiskyscraper.com/</a> [burjdubaiskyscraper.com] shows the following:
"detected: Trojan program Trojan-Downloader.JS.Agent.ewi"  Be careful...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kaspersky AV when going to http : //www.burjdubaiskyscraper.com/ [ burjdubaiskyscraper.com ] shows the following : " detected : Trojan program Trojan-Downloader.JS.Agent.ewi " Be careful.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kaspersky AV when going to http://www.burjdubaiskyscraper.com/ [burjdubaiskyscraper.com] shows the following:
"detected: Trojan program Trojan-Downloader.JS.Agent.ewi"  Be careful...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639034</id>
	<title>Re:Great timing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262605500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chrysler <b>State</b> Building?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chrysler State Building ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chrysler State Building?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638126</id>
	<title>Re:Great timing</title>
	<author>thePig</author>
	<datestamp>1262548740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not quite. This building already made 10\% more than what was spent. The company was hoping at max for break-even, since their whole idea was to make money from the 500 acres near it which is also owned by it.<br>That part might have to wait a little, but anything else now is a bonus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not quite .
This building already made 10 \ % more than what was spent .
The company was hoping at max for break-even , since their whole idea was to make money from the 500 acres near it which is also owned by it.That part might have to wait a little , but anything else now is a bonus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not quite.
This building already made 10\% more than what was spent.
The company was hoping at max for break-even, since their whole idea was to make money from the 500 acres near it which is also owned by it.That part might have to wait a little, but anything else now is a bonus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30645614</id>
	<title>Re:More than tallest building</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262597400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No way are oil rigs nearly a kilometer tall.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No way are oil rigs nearly a kilometer tall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No way are oil rigs nearly a kilometer tall.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638170</id>
	<title>Re:More than tallest building</title>
	<author>ls671</author>
	<datestamp>1262635560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; freestanding or otherwise</p><p>I have regularly worked to build more than 1 mile tall structures while working on the oil rigs back then. We inserted permanent steel casing after digging the hole most of the time so the casing would constitute a taller non-freestanding permanent steel structure<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>While drilling in the Rockies, we were well above sea level so our steel structures would actually be standing higher than the 'Dubai Tower'  which I think is is at sea level (or almost).</p><p>The deapeast holes are well above 5 miles !</p><p><a href="http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/AdamCassino.shtml" title="hypertextbook.com">http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/AdamCassino.shtml</a> [hypertextbook.com]</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil\_well" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil\_well</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; freestanding or otherwiseI have regularly worked to build more than 1 mile tall structures while working on the oil rigs back then .
We inserted permanent steel casing after digging the hole most of the time so the casing would constitute a taller non-freestanding permanent steel structure ; - ) While drilling in the Rockies , we were well above sea level so our steel structures would actually be standing higher than the 'Dubai Tower ' which I think is is at sea level ( or almost ) .The deapeast holes are well above 5 miles ! http : //hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/AdamCassino.shtml [ hypertextbook.com ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil \ _well [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; freestanding or otherwiseI have regularly worked to build more than 1 mile tall structures while working on the oil rigs back then.
We inserted permanent steel casing after digging the hole most of the time so the casing would constitute a taller non-freestanding permanent steel structure ;-)While drilling in the Rockies, we were well above sea level so our steel structures would actually be standing higher than the 'Dubai Tower'  which I think is is at sea level (or almost).The deapeast holes are well above 5 miles !http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/AdamCassino.shtml [hypertextbook.com]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil\_well [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638354</id>
	<title>Re:Great timing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262638080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Chrysler State Building was completed in 1930.  The Empire State Building in 1931.  The WTC completed at the start of the 1970s stagflation.
<br> <br>
Construction hubris and economic crash seem to be close companions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Chrysler State Building was completed in 1930 .
The Empire State Building in 1931 .
The WTC completed at the start of the 1970s stagflation .
Construction hubris and economic crash seem to be close companions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Chrysler State Building was completed in 1930.
The Empire State Building in 1931.
The WTC completed at the start of the 1970s stagflation.
Construction hubris and economic crash seem to be close companions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639944</id>
	<title>!!Watch the link in the OP</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262616120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>there is at least one trojan linking off  the page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>there is at least one trojan linking off the page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there is at least one trojan linking off  the page.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638522</id>
	<title>Holes, not poles.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262597460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nowdays I'd prefer my buildings to be as *low* as possible.  Having a nice *deep* underground bunker would be best.</p><p>Tall buildings, as well as other major attractions like stadiums, are a status symbol. Every time the building is mentioned you name either the company, the city, or the country in question. Tall building are a brand image. In these times companies prefer a more conservative (and some may argue greener) profile. Tall buildings in this respect are not useful. It is easier to get the same name-recognition result through other channels - charity events, signage, marketing and teaming on major internet sites, and positive news-generation that involves your company name. Even viral marketing can be a major factor. Ever see the new Lady Gaga video "Bad Romance" and the brands displayed? All of these is far far FAR cheaper than a very tall building.</p><p>Now consider a nice *low* building, maybe even one underground. It is a lot more protected, it tends to be greener as can plant trees or solar panels on the top (lots of good press coverage). It tends to be a lot easier to insulate against weather. There's a lot more stability given when digging underground and the sides of the building are braced by the pressing of the surrounding earth. If a company wants the prestige factor they can put a large sign up near the highway/freeway with their company name on it.</p><p>Best of all it's good against bombs.  Frankly, tall buildings are easy to hit. Underground bunkers are a lot harder.</p><p>So I say, build better deep buildings (holes), not tall towers of concrete (poles).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nowdays I 'd prefer my buildings to be as * low * as possible .
Having a nice * deep * underground bunker would be best.Tall buildings , as well as other major attractions like stadiums , are a status symbol .
Every time the building is mentioned you name either the company , the city , or the country in question .
Tall building are a brand image .
In these times companies prefer a more conservative ( and some may argue greener ) profile .
Tall buildings in this respect are not useful .
It is easier to get the same name-recognition result through other channels - charity events , signage , marketing and teaming on major internet sites , and positive news-generation that involves your company name .
Even viral marketing can be a major factor .
Ever see the new Lady Gaga video " Bad Romance " and the brands displayed ?
All of these is far far FAR cheaper than a very tall building.Now consider a nice * low * building , maybe even one underground .
It is a lot more protected , it tends to be greener as can plant trees or solar panels on the top ( lots of good press coverage ) .
It tends to be a lot easier to insulate against weather .
There 's a lot more stability given when digging underground and the sides of the building are braced by the pressing of the surrounding earth .
If a company wants the prestige factor they can put a large sign up near the highway/freeway with their company name on it.Best of all it 's good against bombs .
Frankly , tall buildings are easy to hit .
Underground bunkers are a lot harder.So I say , build better deep buildings ( holes ) , not tall towers of concrete ( poles ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nowdays I'd prefer my buildings to be as *low* as possible.
Having a nice *deep* underground bunker would be best.Tall buildings, as well as other major attractions like stadiums, are a status symbol.
Every time the building is mentioned you name either the company, the city, or the country in question.
Tall building are a brand image.
In these times companies prefer a more conservative (and some may argue greener) profile.
Tall buildings in this respect are not useful.
It is easier to get the same name-recognition result through other channels - charity events, signage, marketing and teaming on major internet sites, and positive news-generation that involves your company name.
Even viral marketing can be a major factor.
Ever see the new Lady Gaga video "Bad Romance" and the brands displayed?
All of these is far far FAR cheaper than a very tall building.Now consider a nice *low* building, maybe even one underground.
It is a lot more protected, it tends to be greener as can plant trees or solar panels on the top (lots of good press coverage).
It tends to be a lot easier to insulate against weather.
There's a lot more stability given when digging underground and the sides of the building are braced by the pressing of the surrounding earth.
If a company wants the prestige factor they can put a large sign up near the highway/freeway with their company name on it.Best of all it's good against bombs.
Frankly, tall buildings are easy to hit.
Underground bunkers are a lot harder.So I say, build better deep buildings (holes), not tall towers of concrete (poles).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30650402</id>
	<title>Re:Impressive..</title>
	<author>FragHARD</author>
	<datestamp>1262619900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh and don't forget.... they just had to rename it, must have been one of the stipulations the new (bailout) owners wanted,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh and do n't forget.... they just had to rename it , must have been one of the stipulations the new ( bailout ) owners wanted , ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh and don't forget.... they just had to rename it, must have been one of the stipulations the new (bailout) owners wanted, ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639752</id>
	<title>Want to rent a plane?</title>
	<author>jackspenn</author>
	<datestamp>1262614560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm just saying "It makes for one heck of a target".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm just saying " It makes for one heck of a target " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm just saying "It makes for one heck of a target".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638712</id>
	<title>Re:BASE Jump</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262600520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Frankly, I personally won't respect him/her any more than the unsuccessful ones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frankly , I personally wo n't respect him/her any more than the unsuccessful ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frankly, I personally won't respect him/her any more than the unsuccessful ones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30655118</id>
	<title>Safe?</title>
	<author>Doctorer</author>
	<datestamp>1262708460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder how long it'll take for someone to fly a plane into it?<p>Or is it "safe", in an Islamic/Arab country?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how long it 'll take for someone to fly a plane into it ? Or is it " safe " , in an Islamic/Arab country ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how long it'll take for someone to fly a plane into it?Or is it "safe", in an Islamic/Arab country?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638036</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>DemonBeaver</author>
	<datestamp>1262547600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>They sure put a lot of effort in the Citadel and City 17 sets for the upcoming Half-Life movie...</htmltext>
<tokenext>They sure put a lot of effort in the Citadel and City 17 sets for the upcoming Half-Life movie.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They sure put a lot of effort in the Citadel and City 17 sets for the upcoming Half-Life movie...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638538</id>
	<title>Re:And this changes what?</title>
	<author>amRadioHed</author>
	<datestamp>1262597760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would this building be a target for terrorism? As far as I can tell there's never been a case where a building was targeted by terrorists because of its height.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would this building be a target for terrorism ?
As far as I can tell there 's never been a case where a building was targeted by terrorists because of its height .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would this building be a target for terrorism?
As far as I can tell there's never been a case where a building was targeted by terrorists because of its height.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638970</id>
	<title>How is this possible?</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1262604300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can the Burj Dubai be taller than Chuck Norris's own tower? I'm sure it'll get roundhouse kicked down eventually.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can the Burj Dubai be taller than Chuck Norris 's own tower ?
I 'm sure it 'll get roundhouse kicked down eventually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can the Burj Dubai be taller than Chuck Norris's own tower?
I'm sure it'll get roundhouse kicked down eventually.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30645982</id>
	<title>Its like Vegas...</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1262598780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just without the sex and booze...oh wait...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just without the sex and booze...oh wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just without the sex and booze...oh wait...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639056</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>tsa</author>
	<datestamp>1262605980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just as Phoenix, Arizona is. Building cities in deserts is just not a good idea, and exploiting the environment to the absolute maximum it can take is bound to fail in the long run.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just as Phoenix , Arizona is .
Building cities in deserts is just not a good idea , and exploiting the environment to the absolute maximum it can take is bound to fail in the long run .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just as Phoenix, Arizona is.
Building cities in deserts is just not a good idea, and exploiting the environment to the absolute maximum it can take is bound to fail in the long run.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638698</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>vadim\_t</author>
	<datestamp>1262600280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In case you haven't noticed, The Onion only publishes fictional news as a form of satire. Nothing in it should be taken seriously.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In case you have n't noticed , The Onion only publishes fictional news as a form of satire .
Nothing in it should be taken seriously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In case you haven't noticed, The Onion only publishes fictional news as a form of satire.
Nothing in it should be taken seriously.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639700</id>
	<title>Re:Impressive..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262614140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not slavery.... they pay them...<br>skilled carpenters at the site earned UK&pound;4.34 a day, and labourers earned UK&pound;2.8 a day.</p><p>Sadly, It would cost them far more if they where slaves as they would have to feed and house them.  As paid labour they can turn around a charge them for food and housing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not slavery.... they pay them...skilled carpenters at the site earned UK   4.34 a day , and labourers earned UK   2.8 a day.Sadly , It would cost them far more if they where slaves as they would have to feed and house them .
As paid labour they can turn around a charge them for food and housing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not slavery.... they pay them...skilled carpenters at the site earned UK£4.34 a day, and labourers earned UK£2.8 a day.Sadly, It would cost them far more if they where slaves as they would have to feed and house them.
As paid labour they can turn around a charge them for food and housing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638774</id>
	<title>Re:Impressive..</title>
	<author>Pugwash69</author>
	<datestamp>1262601600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's one of the most shocking news items I've read in a while! Thanks for posting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's one of the most shocking news items I 've read in a while !
Thanks for posting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's one of the most shocking news items I've read in a while!
Thanks for posting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30641538</id>
	<title>Re:More than tallest building</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1262624100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, at least they won't have to worry about muslims trying to terror it into the ground.  That's the reason why the replacement for the WTC towers is going to be uninspiringly non-superlative.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , at least they wo n't have to worry about muslims trying to terror it into the ground .
That 's the reason why the replacement for the WTC towers is going to be uninspiringly non-superlative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, at least they won't have to worry about muslims trying to terror it into the ground.
That's the reason why the replacement for the WTC towers is going to be uninspiringly non-superlative.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638300</id>
	<title>BASE Jump</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262637060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The first person to (successfully) BASE jump from this building is going to have serious bragging rights.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first person to ( successfully ) BASE jump from this building is going to have serious bragging rights .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first person to (successfully) BASE jump from this building is going to have serious bragging rights.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638264</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>ls671</author>
	<datestamp>1262636700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I though that some analysts expressed concerns about building extremely high buildings after the twin towers incident. I do not see this point mentioned in the comments yet.</p><p>Back then, I took for granted that USA would not try to hold that record again for obvious reasons.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I though that some analysts expressed concerns about building extremely high buildings after the twin towers incident .
I do not see this point mentioned in the comments yet.Back then , I took for granted that USA would not try to hold that record again for obvious reasons .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>I though that some analysts expressed concerns about building extremely high buildings after the twin towers incident.
I do not see this point mentioned in the comments yet.Back then, I took for granted that USA would not try to hold that record again for obvious reasons.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639242</id>
	<title>And it is needed because...?</title>
	<author>AlecC</author>
	<datestamp>1262608980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>New York need skyscrapers because Manhattan Island is effectively full. Other tall buildings have been built in megacities where a small core is fed by a huge suburbia. How large is Dubai? How far is this building from flat desert where they could have built the equivalent office space in low/medium rise? I know it is a prestige project, but will it be a viable workspace in a few years?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>New York need skyscrapers because Manhattan Island is effectively full .
Other tall buildings have been built in megacities where a small core is fed by a huge suburbia .
How large is Dubai ?
How far is this building from flat desert where they could have built the equivalent office space in low/medium rise ?
I know it is a prestige project , but will it be a viable workspace in a few years ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>New York need skyscrapers because Manhattan Island is effectively full.
Other tall buildings have been built in megacities where a small core is fed by a huge suburbia.
How large is Dubai?
How far is this building from flat desert where they could have built the equivalent office space in low/medium rise?
I know it is a prestige project, but will it be a viable workspace in a few years?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30640734</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>phaggood</author>
	<datestamp>1262620860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess they hired their urban planner away from Phoenix or Las Vegas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess they hired their urban planner away from Phoenix or Las Vegas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess they hired their urban planner away from Phoenix or Las Vegas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30641438</id>
	<title>Another bubble pops</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1262623740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>scheduled to open to the public on Monday.</p></div><p>And scheduled to enter receivership on Tuesday.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>scheduled to open to the public on Monday.And scheduled to enter receivership on Tuesday .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>scheduled to open to the public on Monday.And scheduled to enter receivership on Tuesday.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638700</id>
	<title>Heel Tastic Review</title>
	<author>zonika</author>
	<datestamp>1262600280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Every one of the great time comes in life when that time comes and the stars of his life are in circulation<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. And this is what they think is great too<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.....





<a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Heel-Tastic-Review---Does-it-Work?&amp;id=2852393//" title="ezinearticles.com" rel="nofollow">Heel Tastic Review</a> [ezinearticles.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every one of the great time comes in life when that time comes and the stars of his life are in circulation .. And this is what they think is great too .... . Heel Tastic Review [ ezinearticles.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every one of the great time comes in life when that time comes and the stars of his life are in circulation .. And this is what they think is great too .....





Heel Tastic Review [ezinearticles.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638254</id>
	<title>Re:Impressive..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262636580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTA:<br>I ask the Filipino girl behind the counter if she likes it here. "It's OK," she says cautiously. Really? I say. I can't stand it. She sighs with relief and says: "This is the most terrible place! I hate it! I was here for months before I realised &ndash; everything in Dubai is fake. Everything you see. The trees are fake, the workers' contracts are fake, the islands are fake, the smiles are fake &ndash; even the water is fake!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : I ask the Filipino girl behind the counter if she likes it here .
" It 's OK , " she says cautiously .
Really ? I say .
I ca n't stand it .
She sighs with relief and says : " This is the most terrible place !
I hate it !
I was here for months before I realised    everything in Dubai is fake .
Everything you see .
The trees are fake , the workers ' contracts are fake , the islands are fake , the smiles are fake    even the water is fake !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA:I ask the Filipino girl behind the counter if she likes it here.
"It's OK," she says cautiously.
Really? I say.
I can't stand it.
She sighs with relief and says: "This is the most terrible place!
I hate it!
I was here for months before I realised – everything in Dubai is fake.
Everything you see.
The trees are fake, the workers' contracts are fake, the islands are fake, the smiles are fake – even the water is fake!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637980</id>
	<title>first cock!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262547060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like big gogk</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like big gogk</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like big gogk</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30652488</id>
	<title>Re:Since when do Muslims hate capitalism?</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1262683560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I assume you mean communist? Even most Western nations are quite socialist such as Canada, Britain, France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, Norway etc. and some middle eastern ones are fairly socialist also like Israel and Syria.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I assume you mean communist ?
Even most Western nations are quite socialist such as Canada , Britain , France , Germany , Spain , Sweden , Norway etc .
and some middle eastern ones are fairly socialist also like Israel and Syria .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assume you mean communist?
Even most Western nations are quite socialist such as Canada, Britain, France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, Norway etc.
and some middle eastern ones are fairly socialist also like Israel and Syria.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30648762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638552</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>l2718</author>
	<datestamp>1262598060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm well aware of the artificial life that is a Gulf city.  As I said, building up Dubai is mostly an extravaganza.  Yes, building skyscrapers in Dubai is a bad idea -- but that's because building <i>anything</i> there is inefficient -- not because of a particular problem with skyscrapers.</p><p>The principle still holds: building up is a good approach to urban planning.  Yes, you need appropriate infrastructure: a skyscraper needs a <i>lot</i> of public transport around it (potentially a deep parking facility), as well as massive supplies of water, gas, electricity, steam and so on.  My point is that a suburban sprawling neighbourhood of 100 houses also needs these utilities, and it needs 100 versions of each.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm well aware of the artificial life that is a Gulf city .
As I said , building up Dubai is mostly an extravaganza .
Yes , building skyscrapers in Dubai is a bad idea -- but that 's because building anything there is inefficient -- not because of a particular problem with skyscrapers.The principle still holds : building up is a good approach to urban planning .
Yes , you need appropriate infrastructure : a skyscraper needs a lot of public transport around it ( potentially a deep parking facility ) , as well as massive supplies of water , gas , electricity , steam and so on .
My point is that a suburban sprawling neighbourhood of 100 houses also needs these utilities , and it needs 100 versions of each .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm well aware of the artificial life that is a Gulf city.
As I said, building up Dubai is mostly an extravaganza.
Yes, building skyscrapers in Dubai is a bad idea -- but that's because building anything there is inefficient -- not because of a particular problem with skyscrapers.The principle still holds: building up is a good approach to urban planning.
Yes, you need appropriate infrastructure: a skyscraper needs a lot of public transport around it (potentially a deep parking facility), as well as massive supplies of water, gas, electricity, steam and so on.
My point is that a suburban sprawling neighbourhood of 100 houses also needs these utilities, and it needs 100 versions of each.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30645492</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>Darinbob</author>
	<datestamp>1262597100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I first heard about Dubai, I too wondered how it was going to make a luxury playground in the barren desert.  I incorrectly thought that this was like the rest of the United Arab Emirates and was full of oil, and was building some big luxury hotels and conference centers to flaunt its wealth.  Only later did I learn that it had relatively little oil, and that it was a full city and not just a strip of hotels.  When I saw all the large artificial islands and peninsulas from Goggle Earth maps, that clinched it as a place that was seriously messed up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I first heard about Dubai , I too wondered how it was going to make a luxury playground in the barren desert .
I incorrectly thought that this was like the rest of the United Arab Emirates and was full of oil , and was building some big luxury hotels and conference centers to flaunt its wealth .
Only later did I learn that it had relatively little oil , and that it was a full city and not just a strip of hotels .
When I saw all the large artificial islands and peninsulas from Goggle Earth maps , that clinched it as a place that was seriously messed up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I first heard about Dubai, I too wondered how it was going to make a luxury playground in the barren desert.
I incorrectly thought that this was like the rest of the United Arab Emirates and was full of oil, and was building some big luxury hotels and conference centers to flaunt its wealth.
Only later did I learn that it had relatively little oil, and that it was a full city and not just a strip of hotels.
When I saw all the large artificial islands and peninsulas from Goggle Earth maps, that clinched it as a place that was seriously messed up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30641808</id>
	<title>Yeah it's tall, but the observartion deck...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262625060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The observation deck is still only 442m up the 824m building, with 25 levels of offices, 15 levels of communications and 42 levels of machinery towering above it.</p><p>That puts the observation deck below those of the Shanghai World Financial Center (474m) and the CN Tower (446m), and a mere 30m above the Willis/Sears Tower's deck.</p><p>And we all know there's no point in having the world's tallest building if it doesn't have balls to show its visitors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The observation deck is still only 442m up the 824m building , with 25 levels of offices , 15 levels of communications and 42 levels of machinery towering above it.That puts the observation deck below those of the Shanghai World Financial Center ( 474m ) and the CN Tower ( 446m ) , and a mere 30m above the Willis/Sears Tower 's deck.And we all know there 's no point in having the world 's tallest building if it does n't have balls to show its visitors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The observation deck is still only 442m up the 824m building, with 25 levels of offices, 15 levels of communications and 42 levels of machinery towering above it.That puts the observation deck below those of the Shanghai World Financial Center (474m) and the CN Tower (446m), and a mere 30m above the Willis/Sears Tower's deck.And we all know there's no point in having the world's tallest building if it doesn't have balls to show its visitors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30641630</id>
	<title>Re:Great timing</title>
	<author>dwye</author>
	<datestamp>1262624520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Right in time for the Dubai economy to start tanking.</p><p>The Dubai economy already tanked (they are the "Arabs" without oil, just a good location between Arabia and India) months ago, and Abu Dhabi (Arabs WITH oil) bailed them out.</p><p>OTOH, the Empire State Building was finished in the depths of the Great Depression, and took decades to fill up.  Again, the towers of the World Trade Center were finished after the US went into a recession, and took years to fill up (that is why Cantor Fitzgerald was able to get the top floors).  This sort of thing happens in every downturn, since SOMEONE has to be last to start the biggest whatever and get caught when the economy tanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Right in time for the Dubai economy to start tanking.The Dubai economy already tanked ( they are the " Arabs " without oil , just a good location between Arabia and India ) months ago , and Abu Dhabi ( Arabs WITH oil ) bailed them out.OTOH , the Empire State Building was finished in the depths of the Great Depression , and took decades to fill up .
Again , the towers of the World Trade Center were finished after the US went into a recession , and took years to fill up ( that is why Cantor Fitzgerald was able to get the top floors ) .
This sort of thing happens in every downturn , since SOMEONE has to be last to start the biggest whatever and get caught when the economy tanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Right in time for the Dubai economy to start tanking.The Dubai economy already tanked (they are the "Arabs" without oil, just a good location between Arabia and India) months ago, and Abu Dhabi (Arabs WITH oil) bailed them out.OTOH, the Empire State Building was finished in the depths of the Great Depression, and took decades to fill up.
Again, the towers of the World Trade Center were finished after the US went into a recession, and took years to fill up (that is why Cantor Fitzgerald was able to get the top floors).
This sort of thing happens in every downturn, since SOMEONE has to be last to start the biggest whatever and get caught when the economy tanks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30641148</id>
	<title>Tallest free-standing structure is</title>
	<author>SlappyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1262622600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tallest free-standing structure is a sign standing next to the Burj Dubai saying, "Our mountain of debt is this high."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tallest free-standing structure is a sign standing next to the Burj Dubai saying , " Our mountain of debt is this high .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tallest free-standing structure is a sign standing next to the Burj Dubai saying, "Our mountain of debt is this high.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639516</id>
	<title>Re:More than tallest building</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1262612280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>...which took the lead when a mast in Poland fell down if I am not much mistaken about the history...</i></p><p>Yup, radio mast in Konstantynow which fell down in 1991 due to cable handling error during maintenance (which was a bit neglected anyway). 646 meters, though supposedly chosen because it was half-wavelength of its transmission (giving it fabulous "range")<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw\_radio\_mast" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw\_radio\_mast</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...which took the lead when a mast in Poland fell down if I am not much mistaken about the history...Yup , radio mast in Konstantynow which fell down in 1991 due to cable handling error during maintenance ( which was a bit neglected anyway ) .
646 meters , though supposedly chosen because it was half-wavelength of its transmission ( giving it fabulous " range " ) http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw \ _radio \ _mast [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...which took the lead when a mast in Poland fell down if I am not much mistaken about the history...Yup, radio mast in Konstantynow which fell down in 1991 due to cable handling error during maintenance (which was a bit neglected anyway).
646 meters, though supposedly chosen because it was half-wavelength of its transmission (giving it fabulous "range")http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw\_radio\_mast [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30642398</id>
	<title>Re:Holes, not poles.</title>
	<author>Nukenbar</author>
	<datestamp>1262627280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sounds like a great view.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sounds like a great view .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sounds like a great view.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638346</id>
	<title>PropertyGuru</title>
	<author>propertyguru1</author>
	<datestamp>1262637960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>interestin time to open the Burj Dubai especially with DUbai in a financial turmoil. There is a related article on the global economy which may be of interest to some:

<a href="http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/news/2010/1/27066/2009-was-an-easy-year-for-investors-and-now-comes-" title="propertyguru.com.sg" rel="nofollow">http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/news/2010/1/27066/2009-was-an-easy-year-for-investors-and-now-comes-</a> [propertyguru.com.sg]</htmltext>
<tokenext>interestin time to open the Burj Dubai especially with DUbai in a financial turmoil .
There is a related article on the global economy which may be of interest to some : http : //www.propertyguru.com.sg/news/2010/1/27066/2009-was-an-easy-year-for-investors-and-now-comes- [ propertyguru.com.sg ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>interestin time to open the Burj Dubai especially with DUbai in a financial turmoil.
There is a related article on the global economy which may be of interest to some:

http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/news/2010/1/27066/2009-was-an-easy-year-for-investors-and-now-comes- [propertyguru.com.sg]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638942</id>
	<title>Space occupied by elevators</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262603880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Given a proper infrastructure in the surrounding area, tall buildings can certainly lead to a more efficient transportation system. When a building reaches a certain size however, the transportation system inside the building starts to become a problem. How tall can a building be built before all the space gets eaten up by elevator shafts?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given a proper infrastructure in the surrounding area , tall buildings can certainly lead to a more efficient transportation system .
When a building reaches a certain size however , the transportation system inside the building starts to become a problem .
How tall can a building be built before all the space gets eaten up by elevator shafts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given a proper infrastructure in the surrounding area, tall buildings can certainly lead to a more efficient transportation system.
When a building reaches a certain size however, the transportation system inside the building starts to become a problem.
How tall can a building be built before all the space gets eaten up by elevator shafts?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639054</id>
	<title>Re:Holes, not poles.</title>
	<author>xaxa</author>
	<datestamp>1262605980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A tall building can be "green", for instance you can <a href="http://www.co-operative.coop/aboutus/ourvaluesandprinciples/ourvaluesinaction/thesolartower/" title="co-operative.coop">face it with solar panels</a> [co-operative.coop] (even in the north of England!) and you can <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/30\_St\_Mary\_Axe#Design\_and\_construction" title="wikipedia.org">use its height like a chimney to provide ventilation</a> [wikipedia.org]. An underground building is going to require even more ventilation, and lots more artificial light.</p><p>A small bomb detonated in an underground building would likely cause more damage/injuries, as the explosion is confined to the building rather than blowing out through windows.</p><p>Anyway, how tall is tall? 14 stories, or 40, or 80, or more?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A tall building can be " green " , for instance you can face it with solar panels [ co-operative.coop ] ( even in the north of England !
) and you can use its height like a chimney to provide ventilation [ wikipedia.org ] .
An underground building is going to require even more ventilation , and lots more artificial light.A small bomb detonated in an underground building would likely cause more damage/injuries , as the explosion is confined to the building rather than blowing out through windows.Anyway , how tall is tall ?
14 stories , or 40 , or 80 , or more ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A tall building can be "green", for instance you can face it with solar panels [co-operative.coop] (even in the north of England!
) and you can use its height like a chimney to provide ventilation [wikipedia.org].
An underground building is going to require even more ventilation, and lots more artificial light.A small bomb detonated in an underground building would likely cause more damage/injuries, as the explosion is confined to the building rather than blowing out through windows.Anyway, how tall is tall?
14 stories, or 40, or 80, or more?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638010</id>
	<title>And this changes what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262547360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Presumably, finishing the building is a good thing, but it doesn't make much of a dent in the fundamentals of the place that it is built in.  Even a building this monumental is only going to get so much attention and translating that into revenue will be that much more difficult.</p><p>If their model really is "borrow and build", it definitely is a dangerous basis to start with.  Hopefully, they can get their house in order, but that surprise moratorium on payments coupled with the extreme ambitiousness of the projects makes me wonder if they are overreaching.</p><p>On a much darker note, I also wonder whether this new building has a big bullseye painted on it for some of the region's less industrious, and more violent, inhabitants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Presumably , finishing the building is a good thing , but it does n't make much of a dent in the fundamentals of the place that it is built in .
Even a building this monumental is only going to get so much attention and translating that into revenue will be that much more difficult.If their model really is " borrow and build " , it definitely is a dangerous basis to start with .
Hopefully , they can get their house in order , but that surprise moratorium on payments coupled with the extreme ambitiousness of the projects makes me wonder if they are overreaching.On a much darker note , I also wonder whether this new building has a big bullseye painted on it for some of the region 's less industrious , and more violent , inhabitants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presumably, finishing the building is a good thing, but it doesn't make much of a dent in the fundamentals of the place that it is built in.
Even a building this monumental is only going to get so much attention and translating that into revenue will be that much more difficult.If their model really is "borrow and build", it definitely is a dangerous basis to start with.
Hopefully, they can get their house in order, but that surprise moratorium on payments coupled with the extreme ambitiousness of the projects makes me wonder if they are overreaching.On a much darker note, I also wonder whether this new building has a big bullseye painted on it for some of the region's less industrious, and more violent, inhabitants.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638504</id>
	<title>Re:Have they contributed anything to science?</title>
	<author>majid\_aldo</author>
	<datestamp>1262597340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>- dubai doesn't have oil, it relies on foreign investments for its projects. (hence, int'l markets went bezerk when it recently defaulted)<br>- dubai has better educational institutions compared to the region<br>- dubai as it is today, wouldn't have happened w/o foreign participation, at least within this timescale<br>- UAE citizen's education are subsidized. in fact, UAE human development index is #35 in the world; just a tad below developed countries<br>- dubai is too small for it to make regular major headlines in science (unless it imports scientists en masse. is that ok with you?). as dubai is part of the larger arab and islamic world, a better question would be: why are arabs and muslims behind? (ans. should be a sophisticated analysis please)</p><p>to give dubai's leader (yes, a dicator) credit, he had to spend spend spend to create infrastructure that would ALLOW and create an environment for further development.</p><p>please make more informed comments in the future. you can take a side, as being for dubai or against it, but make more informed arguments. ideally, you wouldn't need to take a side, but comment on dubai point by point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>- dubai does n't have oil , it relies on foreign investments for its projects .
( hence , int'l markets went bezerk when it recently defaulted ) - dubai has better educational institutions compared to the region- dubai as it is today , would n't have happened w/o foreign participation , at least within this timescale- UAE citizen 's education are subsidized .
in fact , UAE human development index is # 35 in the world ; just a tad below developed countries- dubai is too small for it to make regular major headlines in science ( unless it imports scientists en masse .
is that ok with you ? ) .
as dubai is part of the larger arab and islamic world , a better question would be : why are arabs and muslims behind ?
( ans. should be a sophisticated analysis please ) to give dubai 's leader ( yes , a dicator ) credit , he had to spend spend spend to create infrastructure that would ALLOW and create an environment for further development.please make more informed comments in the future .
you can take a side , as being for dubai or against it , but make more informed arguments .
ideally , you would n't need to take a side , but comment on dubai point by point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- dubai doesn't have oil, it relies on foreign investments for its projects.
(hence, int'l markets went bezerk when it recently defaulted)- dubai has better educational institutions compared to the region- dubai as it is today, wouldn't have happened w/o foreign participation, at least within this timescale- UAE citizen's education are subsidized.
in fact, UAE human development index is #35 in the world; just a tad below developed countries- dubai is too small for it to make regular major headlines in science (unless it imports scientists en masse.
is that ok with you?).
as dubai is part of the larger arab and islamic world, a better question would be: why are arabs and muslims behind?
(ans. should be a sophisticated analysis please)to give dubai's leader (yes, a dicator) credit, he had to spend spend spend to create infrastructure that would ALLOW and create an environment for further development.please make more informed comments in the future.
you can take a side, as being for dubai or against it, but make more informed arguments.
ideally, you wouldn't need to take a side, but comment on dubai point by point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30653120</id>
	<title>Tallest?</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1262691360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this the tallest in the same way the Ptronas(sp?) towers were "taller" than the Sears Tower? Eg. higher decorative spire as opposed to higher usable space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this the tallest in the same way the Ptronas ( sp ?
) towers were " taller " than the Sears Tower ?
Eg. higher decorative spire as opposed to higher usable space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this the tallest in the same way the Ptronas(sp?
) towers were "taller" than the Sears Tower?
Eg. higher decorative spire as opposed to higher usable space.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638146</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1262635260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Higher population density makes for better public transportation</p></div><p>And because the public transportation is <b>vertical</b> it can be totally free without offending the free marketers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Higher population density makes for better public transportationAnd because the public transportation is vertical it can be totally free without offending the free marketers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Higher population density makes for better public transportationAnd because the public transportation is vertical it can be totally free without offending the free marketers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639848</id>
	<title>Re:More than tallest building</title>
	<author>ari\_j</author>
	<datestamp>1262615280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You raise a valid point.  I'm from oil country myself, and hadn't considered well casing - made of the same two main materials as the Burj Dubai, at that, good old steel and concrete.  Most of our current drilling is to around 10,000 ft. as I understand it, with another 2 miles of horizontal drilling once you get there, but I don't know that the horizontal legs are cased.  At any rate, straight-bore holes have been drilled well beyond a mile for a long time, so if you count basements they win hands-down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You raise a valid point .
I 'm from oil country myself , and had n't considered well casing - made of the same two main materials as the Burj Dubai , at that , good old steel and concrete .
Most of our current drilling is to around 10,000 ft. as I understand it , with another 2 miles of horizontal drilling once you get there , but I do n't know that the horizontal legs are cased .
At any rate , straight-bore holes have been drilled well beyond a mile for a long time , so if you count basements they win hands-down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You raise a valid point.
I'm from oil country myself, and hadn't considered well casing - made of the same two main materials as the Burj Dubai, at that, good old steel and concrete.
Most of our current drilling is to around 10,000 ft. as I understand it, with another 2 miles of horizontal drilling once you get there, but I don't know that the horizontal legs are cased.
At any rate, straight-bore holes have been drilled well beyond a mile for a long time, so if you count basements they win hands-down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30643948</id>
	<title>Re:Impressive..</title>
	<author>clarkkent09</author>
	<datestamp>1262633640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, tricking workers into slavery by promising them high pay then taking their passports away and forcing them to work for low pay with the collusion of a corrupt autocratic government is an example of what happens when you have TOO MUCH economic liberty? I think you are crazy. <br> <br>

Take a look at how UAE ranks in the Index of Economic Fredom: <a href="http://www.heritage.org/Index/Ranking.aspx" title="heritage.org">http://www.heritage.org/Index/Ranking.aspx</a> [heritage.org]
<br> <br>While you are there take a moment to notice the strong correlation between economic liberty and political liberty as well as prosperity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , tricking workers into slavery by promising them high pay then taking their passports away and forcing them to work for low pay with the collusion of a corrupt autocratic government is an example of what happens when you have TOO MUCH economic liberty ?
I think you are crazy .
Take a look at how UAE ranks in the Index of Economic Fredom : http : //www.heritage.org/Index/Ranking.aspx [ heritage.org ] While you are there take a moment to notice the strong correlation between economic liberty and political liberty as well as prosperity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, tricking workers into slavery by promising them high pay then taking their passports away and forcing them to work for low pay with the collusion of a corrupt autocratic government is an example of what happens when you have TOO MUCH economic liberty?
I think you are crazy.
Take a look at how UAE ranks in the Index of Economic Fredom: http://www.heritage.org/Index/Ranking.aspx [heritage.org]
 While you are there take a moment to notice the strong correlation between economic liberty and political liberty as well as prosperity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30711110</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1263044880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I take it you've never heard about central heating? (in this vein: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogeneration" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogeneration</a> [wikipedia.org] ). Or potential energy associated with pumping anything at great heights?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I take it you 've never heard about central heating ?
( in this vein : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogeneration [ wikipedia.org ] ) .
Or potential energy associated with pumping anything at great heights ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I take it you've never heard about central heating?
(in this vein: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogeneration [wikipedia.org] ).
Or potential energy associated with pumping anything at great heights?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30710438</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1263039480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately very few societies are mature enough to flourish in high population density. In most places throughout the world the end result, after few decades, is more or less slums/ghetto.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately very few societies are mature enough to flourish in high population density .
In most places throughout the world the end result , after few decades , is more or less slums/ghetto .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately very few societies are mature enough to flourish in high population density.
In most places throughout the world the end result, after few decades, is more or less slums/ghetto.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638116</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262548560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The principle of building up is right, however. Higher population density makes for better public transportation, more services available within walking distance, and nicer, more pristine outdoors spaces.</p></div><p>50 years ago, Dubai (and Abu Dhabi) was nothing more than a small mud brick &amp; stone town in the desert.<br>Once oil was discovered, the revenues were used to fund explosive development...<br>BUT the emirates did a terrible job of planning.</p><p>There are highrise apartment buildings everywhere, but no parking.<br>They have incredible population density, but no sewage system to speak of.<br>Anything you see that is green must be watered constantly or it'll die.<br>Dubai is a rather good example of how <i>not</i> to build a city.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The principle of building up is right , however .
Higher population density makes for better public transportation , more services available within walking distance , and nicer , more pristine outdoors spaces.50 years ago , Dubai ( and Abu Dhabi ) was nothing more than a small mud brick &amp; stone town in the desert.Once oil was discovered , the revenues were used to fund explosive development...BUT the emirates did a terrible job of planning.There are highrise apartment buildings everywhere , but no parking.They have incredible population density , but no sewage system to speak of.Anything you see that is green must be watered constantly or it 'll die.Dubai is a rather good example of how not to build a city .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The principle of building up is right, however.
Higher population density makes for better public transportation, more services available within walking distance, and nicer, more pristine outdoors spaces.50 years ago, Dubai (and Abu Dhabi) was nothing more than a small mud brick &amp; stone town in the desert.Once oil was discovered, the revenues were used to fund explosive development...BUT the emirates did a terrible job of planning.There are highrise apartment buildings everywhere, but no parking.They have incredible population density, but no sewage system to speak of.Anything you see that is green must be watered constantly or it'll die.Dubai is a rather good example of how not to build a city.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638060</id>
	<title>dirty money</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262547780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>more real estate bubble</p><p>dubui is the british replacement for hong kong for dirty money transfers.  hah, every government agency has a worthless prince at the top and the second in command, who actually runs things, is always a brit.  when the drug lords disneyland resorts started going under, it tended to set off a wave of soverign defaults, of which greece is  the leading example.  so this building is not anything to admire, but something to condemn</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>more real estate bubbledubui is the british replacement for hong kong for dirty money transfers .
hah , every government agency has a worthless prince at the top and the second in command , who actually runs things , is always a brit .
when the drug lords disneyland resorts started going under , it tended to set off a wave of soverign defaults , of which greece is the leading example .
so this building is not anything to admire , but something to condemn</tokentext>
<sentencetext>more real estate bubbledubui is the british replacement for hong kong for dirty money transfers.
hah, every government agency has a worthless prince at the top and the second in command, who actually runs things, is always a brit.
when the drug lords disneyland resorts started going under, it tended to set off a wave of soverign defaults, of which greece is  the leading example.
so this building is not anything to admire, but something to condemn</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637992</id>
	<title>Great timing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262547180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right in time for the Dubai economy to start tanking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right in time for the Dubai economy to start tanking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right in time for the Dubai economy to start tanking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639338</id>
	<title>Re:Impressive..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262610060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too bad you are too dumb to realize you are a slave to the IRS too!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad you are too dumb to realize you are a slave to the IRS too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad you are too dumb to realize you are a slave to the IRS too!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30640238</id>
	<title>CN Tower is still #1</title>
	<author>spammeister</author>
	<datestamp>1262618340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For it's observation deck is still higher off the ground than the public observation deck of the Burj. Unless they were lying about that as well, but I don't think I'll be going back to Dubai any time soon to verfiy the vertigo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For it 's observation deck is still higher off the ground than the public observation deck of the Burj .
Unless they were lying about that as well , but I do n't think I 'll be going back to Dubai any time soon to verfiy the vertigo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For it's observation deck is still higher off the ground than the public observation deck of the Burj.
Unless they were lying about that as well, but I don't think I'll be going back to Dubai any time soon to verfiy the vertigo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638404</id>
	<title>Re:Impressive..</title>
	<author>7-Vodka</author>
	<datestamp>1262595720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No shit, that is really sad. Shame on anyone who even mentions dubai while being ignorant of this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No shit , that is really sad .
Shame on anyone who even mentions dubai while being ignorant of this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No shit, that is really sad.
Shame on anyone who even mentions dubai while being ignorant of this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638564</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>amRadioHed</author>
	<datestamp>1262598300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The US hasn't held the record for highest building since 1998, and the World Trade Center was still attacked in '93 despite the Sears Tower having been taller than it for two decades. The WTC was not targeted because of it's significant height, more likely it was targeted for being the most significant landmark in America's financial center.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The US has n't held the record for highest building since 1998 , and the World Trade Center was still attacked in '93 despite the Sears Tower having been taller than it for two decades .
The WTC was not targeted because of it 's significant height , more likely it was targeted for being the most significant landmark in America 's financial center .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The US hasn't held the record for highest building since 1998, and the World Trade Center was still attacked in '93 despite the Sears Tower having been taller than it for two decades.
The WTC was not targeted because of it's significant height, more likely it was targeted for being the most significant landmark in America's financial center.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639772</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>TheLink</author>
	<datestamp>1262614680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; They have incredible population density, but no sewage system to speak of.<br>&gt; Anything you see that is green must be watered constantly or it'll die.<br><br>The sewage might help turn some stuff green...<br><br>Like that MichaelSmith guy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;).</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; They have incredible population density , but no sewage system to speak of. &gt; Anything you see that is green must be watered constantly or it 'll die.The sewage might help turn some stuff green...Like that MichaelSmith guy ; ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; They have incredible population density, but no sewage system to speak of.&gt; Anything you see that is green must be watered constantly or it'll die.The sewage might help turn some stuff green...Like that MichaelSmith guy ;).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30647370</id>
	<title>Re:More than tallest building</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262604480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The deapeast holes are well above 5 miles !</p></div><p>Your <i>mom's hole</i> is deeper than 5 miles!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The deapeast holes are well above 5 miles ! Your mom 's hole is deeper than 5 miles !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The deapeast holes are well above 5 miles !Your mom's hole is deeper than 5 miles!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30643690</id>
	<title>Re:More than tallest building</title>
	<author>MaWeiTao</author>
	<datestamp>1262632620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Last year a couple of guys a couple of guys BASE jumped off the Burj Dubai. They managed to get away with it. If I remember correctly, one of the guys went back for a second attempt and I think he was arrested. The video of the jump was available online.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Last year a couple of guys a couple of guys BASE jumped off the Burj Dubai .
They managed to get away with it .
If I remember correctly , one of the guys went back for a second attempt and I think he was arrested .
The video of the jump was available online .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last year a couple of guys a couple of guys BASE jumped off the Burj Dubai.
They managed to get away with it.
If I remember correctly, one of the guys went back for a second attempt and I think he was arrested.
The video of the jump was available online.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30640386</id>
	<title>Look Out!</title>
	<author>Bearded Frog</author>
	<datestamp>1262619360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Look out guys it's the Combine Citadel from Half Life 2!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look out guys it 's the Combine Citadel from Half Life 2 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look out guys it's the Combine Citadel from Half Life 2!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30640728</id>
	<title>Re:And this changes what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262620860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>On a much darker note, I also wonder whether this new building has a big bullseye painted on it for some of the region's less industrious, and more violent, inhabitants.</p></div></blockquote><p>No, they generally won't shit where they eat.   Muslims can build buildings as tall as they fucking want; it's only Westerners who have to worry about it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On a much darker note , I also wonder whether this new building has a big bullseye painted on it for some of the region 's less industrious , and more violent , inhabitants.No , they generally wo n't shit where they eat .
Muslims can build buildings as tall as they fucking want ; it 's only Westerners who have to worry about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On a much darker note, I also wonder whether this new building has a big bullseye painted on it for some of the region's less industrious, and more violent, inhabitants.No, they generally won't shit where they eat.
Muslims can build buildings as tall as they fucking want; it's only Westerners who have to worry about it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638722</id>
	<title>Re:Holes, not poles.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262600700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Digging holes is WAAAAYYYYY more expensive than building stories (with "normal sized buildings").</p><p>A 10 story building costs more than a 5 story building mainly because the taller building needs a deeper fundamentum in the ground.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Digging holes is WAAAAYYYYY more expensive than building stories ( with " normal sized buildings " ) .A 10 story building costs more than a 5 story building mainly because the taller building needs a deeper fundamentum in the ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Digging holes is WAAAAYYYYY more expensive than building stories (with "normal sized buildings").A 10 story building costs more than a 5 story building mainly because the taller building needs a deeper fundamentum in the ground.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638130</id>
	<title>Re:More than tallest building</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1262548740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You could launch sailplanes by dropping them from an upper storey, and have enough altitude to go off looking for lift. Hmmm I wonder if they encourage or prohibit parasailing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could launch sailplanes by dropping them from an upper storey , and have enough altitude to go off looking for lift .
Hmmm I wonder if they encourage or prohibit parasailing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could launch sailplanes by dropping them from an upper storey, and have enough altitude to go off looking for lift.
Hmmm I wonder if they encourage or prohibit parasailing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638054</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262547720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dubai is going to be one hell of a wasteland in the next 10 or so years. Hell, most of their coastline is already toxic due to the fact they just dump all the city's waste straight into the ocean about 50 miles outa town.
Yeah, congratulations, you have the tallest building in the world. Your beaches still smell like shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dubai is going to be one hell of a wasteland in the next 10 or so years .
Hell , most of their coastline is already toxic due to the fact they just dump all the city 's waste straight into the ocean about 50 miles outa town .
Yeah , congratulations , you have the tallest building in the world .
Your beaches still smell like shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dubai is going to be one hell of a wasteland in the next 10 or so years.
Hell, most of their coastline is already toxic due to the fact they just dump all the city's waste straight into the ocean about 50 miles outa town.
Yeah, congratulations, you have the tallest building in the world.
Your beaches still smell like shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638908</id>
	<title>Re:And this changes what?</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1262603400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, I've always wondered what sort of people are happy to work at the top of buildings like this.</p><p>I'm not scared of heights in the slightest, but I have to say I'd feel a bit nervous purely because of a lack in the faith of the stability of a building like this with the strong winds and earthquakes the area is prone to coupled with the fact it was built using nigh-on slave labour which isn't exactly going to give you the type of worker that particularly cares about being thorough or doing a good job. Not to mention this is quite a symbol of modern capitalism in a region known to have many people with a severe distaste of capitalism.</p><p>Maybe it's just me, but I can't imagine it'd be easy convincing people to rent or buy the upper floors of this thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I 've always wondered what sort of people are happy to work at the top of buildings like this.I 'm not scared of heights in the slightest , but I have to say I 'd feel a bit nervous purely because of a lack in the faith of the stability of a building like this with the strong winds and earthquakes the area is prone to coupled with the fact it was built using nigh-on slave labour which is n't exactly going to give you the type of worker that particularly cares about being thorough or doing a good job .
Not to mention this is quite a symbol of modern capitalism in a region known to have many people with a severe distaste of capitalism.Maybe it 's just me , but I ca n't imagine it 'd be easy convincing people to rent or buy the upper floors of this thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I've always wondered what sort of people are happy to work at the top of buildings like this.I'm not scared of heights in the slightest, but I have to say I'd feel a bit nervous purely because of a lack in the faith of the stability of a building like this with the strong winds and earthquakes the area is prone to coupled with the fact it was built using nigh-on slave labour which isn't exactly going to give you the type of worker that particularly cares about being thorough or doing a good job.
Not to mention this is quite a symbol of modern capitalism in a region known to have many people with a severe distaste of capitalism.Maybe it's just me, but I can't imagine it'd be easy convincing people to rent or buy the upper floors of this thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30643932</id>
	<title>Re:More than tallest building</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262633580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, you are comparing apples and tires.</p><p>1. buildings are *ANCHORED* at their foundations. (bottom)<br>2. oil rigs, are mostly anchored on top. Actually, they are floated over the wellhead when the drilling rig is removed. Basically, they are anchored at both top and bottom with calm seas between them (ocean currents don't travel at 50 knots shifting directions 250m below the surface)</p><p>Saying that, having a giant eyesore like that, not sure, but whatever floats Dubai's boat I guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , you are comparing apples and tires.1 .
buildings are * ANCHORED * at their foundations .
( bottom ) 2. oil rigs , are mostly anchored on top .
Actually , they are floated over the wellhead when the drilling rig is removed .
Basically , they are anchored at both top and bottom with calm seas between them ( ocean currents do n't travel at 50 knots shifting directions 250m below the surface ) Saying that , having a giant eyesore like that , not sure , but whatever floats Dubai 's boat I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, you are comparing apples and tires.1.
buildings are *ANCHORED* at their foundations.
(bottom)2. oil rigs, are mostly anchored on top.
Actually, they are floated over the wellhead when the drilling rig is removed.
Basically, they are anchored at both top and bottom with calm seas between them (ocean currents don't travel at 50 knots shifting directions 250m below the surface)Saying that, having a giant eyesore like that, not sure, but whatever floats Dubai's boat I guess.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638396</id>
	<title>Have they contributed anything to science?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262595600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a 49 year old feminist grandmother color me unimpressed. Dubai hasn't contributed anything to society, they've literally just found oil in the ground and there's no shame in that, but did they use it to educate their people? No of course not, they just spent year after year paying foreign technicians to do what they don't have the knowledge to do... build gigantic structures. The dictator behaves like a 6 year old kid in a toy store with a credit card from santa... no time for education, just another toy built by foreigners... just pay them to build it, don't pay them to teach our own illiterate population who hasn't made any contributions to science. Dubai resembles all that's what's wrong with humanity, the sooner they run out of oil and have to educate themselves or perish the better, fuck em.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a 49 year old feminist grandmother color me unimpressed .
Dubai has n't contributed anything to society , they 've literally just found oil in the ground and there 's no shame in that , but did they use it to educate their people ?
No of course not , they just spent year after year paying foreign technicians to do what they do n't have the knowledge to do... build gigantic structures .
The dictator behaves like a 6 year old kid in a toy store with a credit card from santa... no time for education , just another toy built by foreigners... just pay them to build it , do n't pay them to teach our own illiterate population who has n't made any contributions to science .
Dubai resembles all that 's what 's wrong with humanity , the sooner they run out of oil and have to educate themselves or perish the better , fuck em .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a 49 year old feminist grandmother color me unimpressed.
Dubai hasn't contributed anything to society, they've literally just found oil in the ground and there's no shame in that, but did they use it to educate their people?
No of course not, they just spent year after year paying foreign technicians to do what they don't have the knowledge to do... build gigantic structures.
The dictator behaves like a 6 year old kid in a toy store with a credit card from santa... no time for education, just another toy built by foreigners... just pay them to build it, don't pay them to teach our own illiterate population who hasn't made any contributions to science.
Dubai resembles all that's what's wrong with humanity, the sooner they run out of oil and have to educate themselves or perish the better, fuck em.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638138</id>
	<title>Re:More than tallest building</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262635200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>mast?  is that what you Eurofags call an antenna or aerial?  yeah, just keep Riverdancing you queers, nothing homoerotic about a man wearing pants so tight you can see the outline of his nutsac while he tap-dances for you.  oh and a real Scot wears nothing under his kilt right, to ease the occasional quick fuck up the ass.  you bunch of faggots.</htmltext>
<tokenext>mast ?
is that what you Eurofags call an antenna or aerial ?
yeah , just keep Riverdancing you queers , nothing homoerotic about a man wearing pants so tight you can see the outline of his nutsac while he tap-dances for you .
oh and a real Scot wears nothing under his kilt right , to ease the occasional quick fuck up the ass .
you bunch of faggots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mast?
is that what you Eurofags call an antenna or aerial?
yeah, just keep Riverdancing you queers, nothing homoerotic about a man wearing pants so tight you can see the outline of his nutsac while he tap-dances for you.
oh and a real Scot wears nothing under his kilt right, to ease the occasional quick fuck up the ass.
you bunch of faggots.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638372</id>
	<title>Building?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262638380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>or World's Tallest Terrorist Target?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>or World 's Tallest Terrorist Target ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or World's Tallest Terrorist Target?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30643210</id>
	<title>Re:And this changes what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262630580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to mention the area \_around\_ the building is a complete and utter shit-hole, where only the ultra rich do not live in abject poverty. Like many Arab countries (Saudi Arabia, Bahrain etc), they have the wrong priorities. I could care less how tall a building is, when there isn't nearly enough clean water to drink.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention the area \ _around \ _ the building is a complete and utter shit-hole , where only the ultra rich do not live in abject poverty .
Like many Arab countries ( Saudi Arabia , Bahrain etc ) , they have the wrong priorities .
I could care less how tall a building is , when there is n't nearly enough clean water to drink .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention the area \_around\_ the building is a complete and utter shit-hole, where only the ultra rich do not live in abject poverty.
Like many Arab countries (Saudi Arabia, Bahrain etc), they have the wrong priorities.
I could care less how tall a building is, when there isn't nearly enough clean water to drink.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638386</id>
	<title>I couldn't help but notice...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262638680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... on the Taipei 101 site, the bottom left corner says "Pricavy Policy".</htmltext>
<tokenext>... on the Taipei 101 site , the bottom left corner says " Pricavy Policy " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... on the Taipei 101 site, the bottom left corner says "Pricavy Policy".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639236</id>
	<title>Re:Holes, not poles.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262608800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a lot easier to park a semi (or 12) of fuel-air bombs on top of a bunker than on top of or under a skyscraper. And there are much more limited escape routes (not that escape from a skyscraper is easier, but it's at least plausible).</p><p>It's also not clear to me why it would be any harder to put solar panels or trees on top of a tall building than a short one. I mean, it's a little more work to move the dirt/etc. up to the roof, but it's not *that* complicated. And in an underground building you'd already be moving dirt up the same distance just to dig the hole. And you'll have to put all that dirt somewhere -- you'd end up with a 100-story tall pile of dirt, which is not a trivial thing to deal with.</p><p>Also the building is not braced by the pressing of the surrounding earth, it's *stressed* by the pressing of the surrounding earth and must rigidly resist those forces to avoid crushing the occupants or causing massive sinkholes in the surrounding area. Try digging a vertically-edged hole in your backyard and see how long it stands up to erosion and other forces without a significant amount of bracing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a lot easier to park a semi ( or 12 ) of fuel-air bombs on top of a bunker than on top of or under a skyscraper .
And there are much more limited escape routes ( not that escape from a skyscraper is easier , but it 's at least plausible ) .It 's also not clear to me why it would be any harder to put solar panels or trees on top of a tall building than a short one .
I mean , it 's a little more work to move the dirt/etc .
up to the roof , but it 's not * that * complicated .
And in an underground building you 'd already be moving dirt up the same distance just to dig the hole .
And you 'll have to put all that dirt somewhere -- you 'd end up with a 100-story tall pile of dirt , which is not a trivial thing to deal with.Also the building is not braced by the pressing of the surrounding earth , it 's * stressed * by the pressing of the surrounding earth and must rigidly resist those forces to avoid crushing the occupants or causing massive sinkholes in the surrounding area .
Try digging a vertically-edged hole in your backyard and see how long it stands up to erosion and other forces without a significant amount of bracing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a lot easier to park a semi (or 12) of fuel-air bombs on top of a bunker than on top of or under a skyscraper.
And there are much more limited escape routes (not that escape from a skyscraper is easier, but it's at least plausible).It's also not clear to me why it would be any harder to put solar panels or trees on top of a tall building than a short one.
I mean, it's a little more work to move the dirt/etc.
up to the roof, but it's not *that* complicated.
And in an underground building you'd already be moving dirt up the same distance just to dig the hole.
And you'll have to put all that dirt somewhere -- you'd end up with a 100-story tall pile of dirt, which is not a trivial thing to deal with.Also the building is not braced by the pressing of the surrounding earth, it's *stressed* by the pressing of the surrounding earth and must rigidly resist those forces to avoid crushing the occupants or causing massive sinkholes in the surrounding area.
Try digging a vertically-edged hole in your backyard and see how long it stands up to erosion and other forces without a significant amount of bracing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30640992</id>
	<title>Should have been a solar updraft tower</title>
	<author>Baldrson</author>
	<datestamp>1262621940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too bad he didn't build <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20080624182200/http://www.geocities.com/jim\_bowery/sutabs.html" title="archive.org">a solar updraft tower instead</a> [archive.org].  Dubai might be worth something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad he did n't build a solar updraft tower instead [ archive.org ] .
Dubai might be worth something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad he didn't build a solar updraft tower instead [archive.org].
Dubai might be worth something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004</id>
	<title>More than tallest building</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262547240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is the tallest manmade structure in the world, freestanding or otherwise.  The previous record was held by a TV mast in eastern North Dakota, which took the lead when a mast in Poland fell down if I am not much mistaken about the history.  This building has occupied floors higher than the world's tallest TV mast.  The only thing possibly taller would be offshore oil rigs, but I can't remember how those stack up against it.  A very impressive accomplishment, so long as it stays standing through Monday.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the tallest manmade structure in the world , freestanding or otherwise .
The previous record was held by a TV mast in eastern North Dakota , which took the lead when a mast in Poland fell down if I am not much mistaken about the history .
This building has occupied floors higher than the world 's tallest TV mast .
The only thing possibly taller would be offshore oil rigs , but I ca n't remember how those stack up against it .
A very impressive accomplishment , so long as it stays standing through Monday .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the tallest manmade structure in the world, freestanding or otherwise.
The previous record was held by a TV mast in eastern North Dakota, which took the lead when a mast in Poland fell down if I am not much mistaken about the history.
This building has occupied floors higher than the world's tallest TV mast.
The only thing possibly taller would be offshore oil rigs, but I can't remember how those stack up against it.
A very impressive accomplishment, so long as it stays standing through Monday.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639038</id>
	<title>Kind of reflects Dubai; the higher you build..</title>
	<author>angrygretchen</author>
	<datestamp>1262605560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the greater the fall.</htmltext>
<tokenext>the greater the fall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the greater the fall.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030</id>
	<title>Impressive..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262547540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too bad it was <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/the-dark-side-of-dubai-1664368.html" title="independent.co.uk" rel="nofollow">built with slavery</a> [independent.co.uk]...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad it was built with slavery [ independent.co.uk ] .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad it was built with slavery [independent.co.uk]...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638006</id>
	<title>One comment...and one tenant</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262547300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It turns out, the sole tenant is a HUGE<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. fanboy!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It turns out , the sole tenant is a HUGE / .
fanboy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It turns out, the sole tenant is a HUGE /.
fanboy!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639414</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262611200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Empty State Building made $2 million from the observation deck which was the same amount as they made from rent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Empty State Building made $ 2 million from the observation deck which was the same amount as they made from rent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Empty State Building made $2 million from the observation deck which was the same amount as they made from rent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30642092</id>
	<title>Re:More than tallest building</title>
	<author>BJH</author>
	<datestamp>1262626200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guy I used to work with basejumped off the Burj Dubai while it was under construction - the video's on Youtube.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guy I used to work with basejumped off the Burj Dubai while it was under construction - the video 's on Youtube .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guy I used to work with basejumped off the Burj Dubai while it was under construction - the video's on Youtube.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638188</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262635680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait a minute, building high-rises REDUCES the price of land?  Sorry buddy, I'm not sure which alternate dimension you came from, but that doesn't happen in our shard of reality.  Are you one of those "new urbanists" who think <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/39315" title="theonion.com">creating traffic jams is a great idea</a> [theonion.com]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait a minute , building high-rises REDUCES the price of land ?
Sorry buddy , I 'm not sure which alternate dimension you came from , but that does n't happen in our shard of reality .
Are you one of those " new urbanists " who think creating traffic jams is a great idea [ theonion.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait a minute, building high-rises REDUCES the price of land?
Sorry buddy, I'm not sure which alternate dimension you came from, but that doesn't happen in our shard of reality.
Are you one of those "new urbanists" who think creating traffic jams is a great idea [theonion.com]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638846</id>
	<title>This is the modern-day Tower of Babel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262602560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the modern-day Tower of Babel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the modern-day Tower of Babel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the modern-day Tower of Babel.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638296</id>
	<title>Lame ad?</title>
	<author>Stratoukos</author>
	<datestamp>1262637000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why on earth does the website of one of the grandest human accomplishments has an ad with the "1 tip of a tiny belly"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why on earth does the website of one of the grandest human accomplishments has an ad with the " 1 tip of a tiny belly " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why on earth does the website of one of the grandest human accomplishments has an ad with the "1 tip of a tiny belly"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639396</id>
	<title>Re:Great timing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262611020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do they put as mosque on the top? I tought a mosque must be the tallest building in town...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do they put as mosque on the top ?
I tought a mosque must be the tallest building in town.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do they put as mosque on the top?
I tought a mosque must be the tallest building in town...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30651692</id>
	<title>Re:Impressive..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262631300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's so well said, these guys are racist egoists who'd not produce anything themselves and rather have someone wipe it for them and get paid, I was born there and lived there but I don't feel like I belong there, I am from an Arabian country too and being discriminated against too, but we are more tolerant and welcoming of others than any of these nationalities you mentioned.. You just can't have something built for you by a company that's overseas, by workers who came from overseas and exploited and screwed and abused and built for the purpose of void-national-pride-in-nothing, and then just go out brag about it as if you were the one who sweat your ass out and calloused your hands building it or as if it were gonna help the humanity a mighty deal showing them a glittery building, duhhh.... I just can't wrap my head around this concept, but to invent an HIV medicine would be a just reason to take absolute pride and joy and not a prick building built for bravadoes...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's so well said , these guys are racist egoists who 'd not produce anything themselves and rather have someone wipe it for them and get paid , I was born there and lived there but I do n't feel like I belong there , I am from an Arabian country too and being discriminated against too , but we are more tolerant and welcoming of others than any of these nationalities you mentioned.. You just ca n't have something built for you by a company that 's overseas , by workers who came from overseas and exploited and screwed and abused and built for the purpose of void-national-pride-in-nothing , and then just go out brag about it as if you were the one who sweat your ass out and calloused your hands building it or as if it were gon na help the humanity a mighty deal showing them a glittery building , duhhh.... I just ca n't wrap my head around this concept , but to invent an HIV medicine would be a just reason to take absolute pride and joy and not a prick building built for bravadoes.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's so well said, these guys are racist egoists who'd not produce anything themselves and rather have someone wipe it for them and get paid, I was born there and lived there but I don't feel like I belong there, I am from an Arabian country too and being discriminated against too, but we are more tolerant and welcoming of others than any of these nationalities you mentioned.. You just can't have something built for you by a company that's overseas, by workers who came from overseas and exploited and screwed and abused and built for the purpose of void-national-pride-in-nothing, and then just go out brag about it as if you were the one who sweat your ass out and calloused your hands building it or as if it were gonna help the humanity a mighty deal showing them a glittery building, duhhh.... I just can't wrap my head around this concept, but to invent an HIV medicine would be a just reason to take absolute pride and joy and not a prick building built for bravadoes...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638248</id>
	<title>Re:Impressive..</title>
	<author>ajay\_walia</author>
	<datestamp>1262636520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess this is the same with the region , everybody is doing it</p><p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/yfp83dp" title="tinyurl.com" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yfp83dp</a> [tinyurl.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess this is the same with the region , everybody is doing ithttp : //tinyurl.com/yfp83dp [ tinyurl.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess this is the same with the region , everybody is doing ithttp://tinyurl.com/yfp83dp [tinyurl.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638326</id>
	<title>Yeah, but it isn't slavery by white people</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262637600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It may be slavery but it isn't slavery by white people.  Therefore it doesn't count.</p><p>Remember Arabs are a Marxist victim class and, as such, can do no real wrong.  The Left will defend whatever practices they engage in and blame the oppressor class (read heterosexual white/Jewish males) for making them commit those acts.  They will work very hard (lying and fabricating as needed) to create a moral equivalence between enslaving Arabs and Jews/Americans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It may be slavery but it is n't slavery by white people .
Therefore it does n't count.Remember Arabs are a Marxist victim class and , as such , can do no real wrong .
The Left will defend whatever practices they engage in and blame the oppressor class ( read heterosexual white/Jewish males ) for making them commit those acts .
They will work very hard ( lying and fabricating as needed ) to create a moral equivalence between enslaving Arabs and Jews/Americans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may be slavery but it isn't slavery by white people.
Therefore it doesn't count.Remember Arabs are a Marxist victim class and, as such, can do no real wrong.
The Left will defend whatever practices they engage in and blame the oppressor class (read heterosexual white/Jewish males) for making them commit those acts.
They will work very hard (lying and fabricating as needed) to create a moral equivalence between enslaving Arabs and Jews/Americans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639742</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>AbRASiON</author>
	<datestamp>1262614440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would it be cynical of me to say "I KNEW IT!" - I've been pondering<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/theorising over the past few months when I think of Dubai of how quickly the place has boomed, everything is an incredible, ridiculous rush to try and convert their economy from oil to tourism.<br>Surely correct planning is being simply thrown to the wayside. I mean I have no facts at all to back me up here, however - I have to at least ask the question, how well built is the Burj Dubai?<br>Is it safe? Are the facilities reliable? - for example my work building is 38 stories and has 2 'service' lifts for cleaners / staff to move between floor besides the regular lifts. I firmly believe they should've built 3 service lifts, most cleaners are waiting 2 to 5 minutes each time they change a floor.</p><p>Now that's only a small basic example but has these kind of finer details been thought of in the Burj Dubai? I have to wonder, how's the water pressure? Sewerage system, network cabling, security, heating, energy efficiency in this building? (etc etc etc, you get the idea)</p><p>The entire place really is just an insane example of how to spend cash, it's totally not self sufficient (They have an indoor ski slope, how much energy does it take? Seriously.... is it on sustainable energy?)<br>I don't mean to throw chip here, because western culture is pretty stupid and wasteful often but I see some real tacky shit over there, it seems like 'we have money, let's do the biggest!!!!!!!!!' (exclamation marks required)</p><p>I'm curious to see the place but mroe from sideshow freak kind of angle and I'm terrified if I ever went there, I'd say or do something taboo which would land me in jail for 4 goddamn years - frankly I think their tourism industry is doomed with such dopey laws.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would it be cynical of me to say " I KNEW IT !
" - I 've been pondering /theorising over the past few months when I think of Dubai of how quickly the place has boomed , everything is an incredible , ridiculous rush to try and convert their economy from oil to tourism.Surely correct planning is being simply thrown to the wayside .
I mean I have no facts at all to back me up here , however - I have to at least ask the question , how well built is the Burj Dubai ? Is it safe ?
Are the facilities reliable ?
- for example my work building is 38 stories and has 2 'service ' lifts for cleaners / staff to move between floor besides the regular lifts .
I firmly believe they should 've built 3 service lifts , most cleaners are waiting 2 to 5 minutes each time they change a floor.Now that 's only a small basic example but has these kind of finer details been thought of in the Burj Dubai ?
I have to wonder , how 's the water pressure ?
Sewerage system , network cabling , security , heating , energy efficiency in this building ?
( etc etc etc , you get the idea ) The entire place really is just an insane example of how to spend cash , it 's totally not self sufficient ( They have an indoor ski slope , how much energy does it take ?
Seriously.... is it on sustainable energy ?
) I do n't mean to throw chip here , because western culture is pretty stupid and wasteful often but I see some real tacky shit over there , it seems like 'we have money , let 's do the biggest ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
' ( exclamation marks required ) I 'm curious to see the place but mroe from sideshow freak kind of angle and I 'm terrified if I ever went there , I 'd say or do something taboo which would land me in jail for 4 goddamn years - frankly I think their tourism industry is doomed with such dopey laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would it be cynical of me to say "I KNEW IT!
" - I've been pondering /theorising over the past few months when I think of Dubai of how quickly the place has boomed, everything is an incredible, ridiculous rush to try and convert their economy from oil to tourism.Surely correct planning is being simply thrown to the wayside.
I mean I have no facts at all to back me up here, however - I have to at least ask the question, how well built is the Burj Dubai?Is it safe?
Are the facilities reliable?
- for example my work building is 38 stories and has 2 'service' lifts for cleaners / staff to move between floor besides the regular lifts.
I firmly believe they should've built 3 service lifts, most cleaners are waiting 2 to 5 minutes each time they change a floor.Now that's only a small basic example but has these kind of finer details been thought of in the Burj Dubai?
I have to wonder, how's the water pressure?
Sewerage system, network cabling, security, heating, energy efficiency in this building?
(etc etc etc, you get the idea)The entire place really is just an insane example of how to spend cash, it's totally not self sufficient (They have an indoor ski slope, how much energy does it take?
Seriously.... is it on sustainable energy?
)I don't mean to throw chip here, because western culture is pretty stupid and wasteful often but I see some real tacky shit over there, it seems like 'we have money, let's do the biggest!!!!!!!!!
' (exclamation marks required)I'm curious to see the place but mroe from sideshow freak kind of angle and I'm terrified if I ever went there, I'd say or do something taboo which would land me in jail for 4 goddamn years - frankly I think their tourism industry is doomed with such dopey laws.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30647500</id>
	<title>Re:Impressive..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262605020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you for that link.  I could weep for humanity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you for that link .
I could weep for humanity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you for that link.
I could weep for humanity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638584</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, but it isn't slavery by white people</title>
	<author>amRadioHed</author>
	<datestamp>1262598540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF are you on about? I hate to break it to you, but trolling is not your strong suite.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF are you on about ?
I hate to break it to you , but trolling is not your strong suite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF are you on about?
I hate to break it to you, but trolling is not your strong suite.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30648762</id>
	<title>Since when do Muslims hate capitalism?</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1262610960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some of them may hate Western values, but there is no Socialist regime left in the region.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of them may hate Western values , but there is no Socialist regime left in the region .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of them may hate Western values, but there is no Socialist regime left in the region.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638238</id>
	<title>Re:More than tallest building</title>
	<author>PingPongBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1262636400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>The only thing possibly taller would be offshore oil rigs, but I can't remember how those stack up against it</em></p><p>In the open sea height is not your friend. Some platforms that have legs all the way down operate at depths up to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil\_platform" title="wikipedia.org">170 m</a> [wikipedia.org]. The above-water portion is about the size of a regular office tower. The deep water platforms float, so their height doesn't include the water depth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only thing possibly taller would be offshore oil rigs , but I ca n't remember how those stack up against itIn the open sea height is not your friend .
Some platforms that have legs all the way down operate at depths up to 170 m [ wikipedia.org ] .
The above-water portion is about the size of a regular office tower .
The deep water platforms float , so their height does n't include the water depth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only thing possibly taller would be offshore oil rigs, but I can't remember how those stack up against itIn the open sea height is not your friend.
Some platforms that have legs all the way down operate at depths up to 170 m [wikipedia.org].
The above-water portion is about the size of a regular office tower.
The deep water platforms float, so their height doesn't include the water depth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016</id>
	<title>The way to go is up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262547420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This particular building is an extreme example; it's more of a publicity stunt than an approach to urban planning.  The principle of building up is right, however.  Higher population density makes for better public transportation, more services available within walking distance, and nicer, more pristine outdoors spaces.  It also makes more efficient use of land, hence reducing its price.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This particular building is an extreme example ; it 's more of a publicity stunt than an approach to urban planning .
The principle of building up is right , however .
Higher population density makes for better public transportation , more services available within walking distance , and nicer , more pristine outdoors spaces .
It also makes more efficient use of land , hence reducing its price .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This particular building is an extreme example; it's more of a publicity stunt than an approach to urban planning.
The principle of building up is right, however.
Higher population density makes for better public transportation, more services available within walking distance, and nicer, more pristine outdoors spaces.
It also makes more efficient use of land, hence reducing its price.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30643164</id>
	<title>Reminds me of a quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262630220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shrek (upon first seeing the Burj Dubai): "Do you think maybe he's compensating for something?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shrek ( upon first seeing the Burj Dubai ) : " Do you think maybe he 's compensating for something ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shrek (upon first seeing the Burj Dubai): "Do you think maybe he's compensating for something?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638290</id>
	<title>Its more than 4/5ths of a Kilometer too!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262636940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More than 4/5ths of a Kilometer too!</p><p>4/5 sounds more than 1/2. And Kilometers are the new metric system that everyone (except the USA - funny that) is adopting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More than 4/5ths of a Kilometer too ! 4/5 sounds more than 1/2 .
And Kilometers are the new metric system that everyone ( except the USA - funny that ) is adopting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More than 4/5ths of a Kilometer too!4/5 sounds more than 1/2.
And Kilometers are the new metric system that everyone (except the USA - funny that) is adopting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30647942</id>
	<title>Re:The way to go is up</title>
	<author>z0idberg</author>
	<datestamp>1262607000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <b>The entire place really is just an insane example of how to spend cash, it's totally not self sufficient </b>(They have an indoor ski slope, how much energy does it take? Seriously.... is it on sustainable energy?)
I don't mean to throw chip here, because western culture is pretty stupid and wasteful often but I see <b>some real tacky shit over there, it seems like 'we have money, let's do the biggest!!!!!!!!!' (exclamation marks required)</b></p> </div><p>
You could just as easily be describing <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Las\_Vegas" title="wikipedia.org"> this place. </a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The entire place really is just an insane example of how to spend cash , it 's totally not self sufficient ( They have an indoor ski slope , how much energy does it take ?
Seriously.... is it on sustainable energy ?
) I do n't mean to throw chip here , because western culture is pretty stupid and wasteful often but I see some real tacky shit over there , it seems like 'we have money , let 's do the biggest ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
' ( exclamation marks required ) You could just as easily be describing this place .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> The entire place really is just an insane example of how to spend cash, it's totally not self sufficient (They have an indoor ski slope, how much energy does it take?
Seriously.... is it on sustainable energy?
)
I don't mean to throw chip here, because western culture is pretty stupid and wasteful often but I see some real tacky shit over there, it seems like 'we have money, let's do the biggest!!!!!!!!!
' (exclamation marks required) 
You could just as easily be describing  this place.
[wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638244</id>
	<title>Re:Impressive..</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1262636460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suspect that that was largely seen as a bonus. Dubai is like the Disney World of unbridled global neoliberalism(the "warts and all" version, not the idealists' version).<br> <br>

Having a bunch of not-quite-slaves-because-we-said-we-would-pay-them to build the scenery and fill drinks for the people who matter is just part of the "charm".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect that that was largely seen as a bonus .
Dubai is like the Disney World of unbridled global neoliberalism ( the " warts and all " version , not the idealists ' version ) .
Having a bunch of not-quite-slaves-because-we-said-we-would-pay-them to build the scenery and fill drinks for the people who matter is just part of the " charm " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect that that was largely seen as a bonus.
Dubai is like the Disney World of unbridled global neoliberalism(the "warts and all" version, not the idealists' version).
Having a bunch of not-quite-slaves-because-we-said-we-would-pay-them to build the scenery and fill drinks for the people who matter is just part of the "charm".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638050</id>
	<title>824m tall, not 818 or 808m.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262547660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The three sides of the building have different heights due to the differing ground levels.</p><p>For a long time, the unofficial height was 808m.  However this then switched to 818m, and now finally 824m as different entrances were chosen as "ground level".</p><p>The problem is that the building is part of a massive development that includes quite a bit of landscaping.  Thus the definition of ground level is somewhat fuzzy.  The real base of the building is an enormous concrete slab a few stories underground.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The three sides of the building have different heights due to the differing ground levels.For a long time , the unofficial height was 808m .
However this then switched to 818m , and now finally 824m as different entrances were chosen as " ground level " .The problem is that the building is part of a massive development that includes quite a bit of landscaping .
Thus the definition of ground level is somewhat fuzzy .
The real base of the building is an enormous concrete slab a few stories underground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The three sides of the building have different heights due to the differing ground levels.For a long time, the unofficial height was 808m.
However this then switched to 818m, and now finally 824m as different entrances were chosen as "ground level".The problem is that the building is part of a massive development that includes quite a bit of landscaping.
Thus the definition of ground level is somewhat fuzzy.
The real base of the building is an enormous concrete slab a few stories underground.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639676</id>
	<title>Taipei 101 was a joke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262613900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The simple fact is, that it was smaller than the sears. They added an artificial roof to extend it above Sears to acquire the title. So much cheating that goes on over there.
OTH, there is NO DOUBT that this one is for real. What a monster. I hope that AQ never decides to take it out. Hopefully, we help them equip it with ABM. I wonder how long before the next building tops this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The simple fact is , that it was smaller than the sears .
They added an artificial roof to extend it above Sears to acquire the title .
So much cheating that goes on over there .
OTH , there is NO DOUBT that this one is for real .
What a monster .
I hope that AQ never decides to take it out .
Hopefully , we help them equip it with ABM .
I wonder how long before the next building tops this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The simple fact is, that it was smaller than the sears.
They added an artificial roof to extend it above Sears to acquire the title.
So much cheating that goes on over there.
OTH, there is NO DOUBT that this one is for real.
What a monster.
I hope that AQ never decides to take it out.
Hopefully, we help them equip it with ABM.
I wonder how long before the next building tops this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638258</id>
	<title>Re:More than tallest building</title>
	<author>Trepidity</author>
	<datestamp>1262636580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This building has occupied floors higher than the world's tallest TV mast.</p></div></blockquote><p>That part isn't actually true (though not by much). The roof of Burj Dubai's highest occupied floor <a href="http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=106899&amp;page=157" title="skyscraperpage.com">seems to be</a> [skyscraperpage.com] 620m or so, slightly less than the 629m TV mast (the last 200m or so of Burj Dubai is unoccupied structure). However, the structure as a whole is much taller than any other structure, and the highest occupied floor is over 100m higher than any other building's occupied floor.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This building has occupied floors higher than the world 's tallest TV mast.That part is n't actually true ( though not by much ) .
The roof of Burj Dubai 's highest occupied floor seems to be [ skyscraperpage.com ] 620m or so , slightly less than the 629m TV mast ( the last 200m or so of Burj Dubai is unoccupied structure ) .
However , the structure as a whole is much taller than any other structure , and the highest occupied floor is over 100m higher than any other building 's occupied floor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This building has occupied floors higher than the world's tallest TV mast.That part isn't actually true (though not by much).
The roof of Burj Dubai's highest occupied floor seems to be [skyscraperpage.com] 620m or so, slightly less than the 629m TV mast (the last 200m or so of Burj Dubai is unoccupied structure).
However, the structure as a whole is much taller than any other structure, and the highest occupied floor is over 100m higher than any other building's occupied floor.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638220</id>
	<title>How that affects traffic ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262636160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tall buildings, by that I mean more that 50 storeys of livable/workable space pose very different challenges. They can house lot more people/offices/homes. How many parking lots does it have ? What about hospitals ? playgrounds ? schools ? Designing elevators for them itself takes an entire fleet of engineers. Is designing taller buildings better in general ? What about security features ? Fire exits ? These are pretty interesting things to look at I am interested in finding out how the architects in Dubai dealt with those issues.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tall buildings , by that I mean more that 50 storeys of livable/workable space pose very different challenges .
They can house lot more people/offices/homes .
How many parking lots does it have ?
What about hospitals ?
playgrounds ?
schools ?
Designing elevators for them itself takes an entire fleet of engineers .
Is designing taller buildings better in general ?
What about security features ?
Fire exits ?
These are pretty interesting things to look at I am interested in finding out how the architects in Dubai dealt with those issues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tall buildings, by that I mean more that 50 storeys of livable/workable space pose very different challenges.
They can house lot more people/offices/homes.
How many parking lots does it have ?
What about hospitals ?
playgrounds ?
schools ?
Designing elevators for them itself takes an entire fleet of engineers.
Is designing taller buildings better in general ?
What about security features ?
Fire exits ?
These are pretty interesting things to look at I am interested in finding out how the architects in Dubai dealt with those issues.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638634</id>
	<title>Re:Have they contributed anything to science?</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1262599320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This particular building? Yes, it did. It tested in practice technologies of architecture and building engineering that existed only in theory before. It pushed the limits a good way further. The original record-keepers were TV towers, unlivable grider constructions. On top of huge ego show off, this project has financed many years of solid scientific research. New materials were developed, new construction principles invented, new methods of calculating old problems on scale not found before were found and programmed.</p><p>Not all science is particle physics, genetics and astrophysics. There is good science behind material durability, construction stability, some really good physics of compound materials, some quite clever chemistry for concrete that would normally explode under such pressures, and so on and so on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This particular building ?
Yes , it did .
It tested in practice technologies of architecture and building engineering that existed only in theory before .
It pushed the limits a good way further .
The original record-keepers were TV towers , unlivable grider constructions .
On top of huge ego show off , this project has financed many years of solid scientific research .
New materials were developed , new construction principles invented , new methods of calculating old problems on scale not found before were found and programmed.Not all science is particle physics , genetics and astrophysics .
There is good science behind material durability , construction stability , some really good physics of compound materials , some quite clever chemistry for concrete that would normally explode under such pressures , and so on and so on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This particular building?
Yes, it did.
It tested in practice technologies of architecture and building engineering that existed only in theory before.
It pushed the limits a good way further.
The original record-keepers were TV towers, unlivable grider constructions.
On top of huge ego show off, this project has financed many years of solid scientific research.
New materials were developed, new construction principles invented, new methods of calculating old problems on scale not found before were found and programmed.Not all science is particle physics, genetics and astrophysics.
There is good science behind material durability, construction stability, some really good physics of compound materials, some quite clever chemistry for concrete that would normally explode under such pressures, and so on and so on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638294</id>
	<title>All solved with parachutes</title>
	<author>Myrcutio</author>
	<datestamp>1262637000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> What about security features ? Fire exits ?</p></div><p>Simple.  They gave every man and male child a parachute in case of emergency, or just for plain fun.  Airplane strikes the building, just open a window and glide away to safety.  Assuming you don't have a burning airplane in your face of course.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about security features ?
Fire exits ? Simple .
They gave every man and male child a parachute in case of emergency , or just for plain fun .
Airplane strikes the building , just open a window and glide away to safety .
Assuming you do n't have a burning airplane in your face of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> What about security features ?
Fire exits ?Simple.
They gave every man and male child a parachute in case of emergency, or just for plain fun.
Airplane strikes the building, just open a window and glide away to safety.
Assuming you don't have a burning airplane in your face of course.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638220</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30650402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30643948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30647370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30643210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30649966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30640734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30647942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639236
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30643932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30647500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30642092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30645496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30641148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30642398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638712
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30641538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30710438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30644396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30641630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30640728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30641848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30645614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30651692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30711110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30645492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30648762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30652488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_037209_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30643690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639236
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30642398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30641848
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638050
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639676
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30640336
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30641630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638354
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638470
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639396
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30644396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638188
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638886
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30710438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638264
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638116
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30640734
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639742
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30645492
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30647942
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639056
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639772
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638552
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30711110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30640444
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30651692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638326
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30650402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30647500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638244
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30643948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638060
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638908
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30643210
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30648762
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30652488
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30649966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30640728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638290
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30637980
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30640238
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638970
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638170
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639848
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30647370
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30643932
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30641538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30641148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30645614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30639516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638130
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30642092
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30643690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30645496
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_037209.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_037209.30638712
</commentlist>
</conversation>
