<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_30_166220</id>
	<title>USPTO Awards LOL Patent To IBM<span class="vballoon-marquee rd\_5"><span>Comments:</span><a href="#">274</a></span></title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1262169180000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>theodp writes <i>"Among the last batch of patents granted in 2009 was one for IBM's <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=7,640,233">Resolution of Abbreviated Text in an Electronic Communications System</a>. The invention of four IBMers addresses the hitherto unsolvable problem of translating abbreviations to their full meaning &mdash; e.g., <a href="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4045/4225941130\_c68b39924a\_o.jpg">'IMHO' means 'In My Humble Opinion'</a> &mdash; and vice versa. From the patent: 'One particularly useful application of the invention is to interpret the meaning of shorthand terms ... For example, one database may define the shorthand term "LOL" to mean "laughing out loud."' USPTO records indicate the patent filing was made more than a year after Big Blue <a href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/soa/IBM-calls-for-patent-reform/0,139023165,139187609,00.htm">called on the industry to stop what it called 'bad behavior'</a> by companies who seek patents for unoriginal work. Yet another example of what USPTO Chief David Kappos called <a href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/10/ibms-apparent-schizophrenia-on-patent.html">IBM's apparent schizophrenia on patent policy</a> back when he managed Big Blue's IP portfolio."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>theodp writes " Among the last batch of patents granted in 2009 was one for IBM 's Resolution of Abbreviated Text in an Electronic Communications System .
The invention of four IBMers addresses the hitherto unsolvable problem of translating abbreviations to their full meaning    e.g. , 'IMHO ' means 'In My Humble Opinion '    and vice versa .
From the patent : 'One particularly useful application of the invention is to interpret the meaning of shorthand terms ... For example , one database may define the shorthand term " LOL " to mean " laughing out loud .
" ' USPTO records indicate the patent filing was made more than a year after Big Blue called on the industry to stop what it called 'bad behavior ' by companies who seek patents for unoriginal work .
Yet another example of what USPTO Chief David Kappos called IBM 's apparent schizophrenia on patent policy back when he managed Big Blue 's IP portfolio .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theodp writes "Among the last batch of patents granted in 2009 was one for IBM's Resolution of Abbreviated Text in an Electronic Communications System.
The invention of four IBMers addresses the hitherto unsolvable problem of translating abbreviations to their full meaning — e.g., 'IMHO' means 'In My Humble Opinion' — and vice versa.
From the patent: 'One particularly useful application of the invention is to interpret the meaning of shorthand terms ... For example, one database may define the shorthand term "LOL" to mean "laughing out loud.
"' USPTO records indicate the patent filing was made more than a year after Big Blue called on the industry to stop what it called 'bad behavior' by companies who seek patents for unoriginal work.
Yet another example of what USPTO Chief David Kappos called IBM's apparent schizophrenia on patent policy back when he managed Big Blue's IP portfolio.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601788</id>
	<title>I have prior art</title>
	<author>eggman9713</author>
	<datestamp>1259850420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Back in high school, I had a notebook (which I think I still have) that had a list of emoticons and their meaning, and also the meaning of acronyms like lol or rofl or imho.
I would consider that prior art if the patent merely is for a translation system.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Back in high school , I had a notebook ( which I think I still have ) that had a list of emoticons and their meaning , and also the meaning of acronyms like lol or rofl or imho .
I would consider that prior art if the patent merely is for a translation system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back in high school, I had a notebook (which I think I still have) that had a list of emoticons and their meaning, and also the meaning of acronyms like lol or rofl or imho.
I would consider that prior art if the patent merely is for a translation system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30645110</id>
	<title>GLGBNAFT...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1231059840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"GLGBNAFT"</p><p>
&nbsp; --Ice T</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" GLGBNAFT "   --Ice T</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"GLGBNAFT"
  --Ice T</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601958</id>
	<title>WTF FTW</title>
	<author>Torodung</author>
	<datestamp>1259851800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love the icon for this article. I wonder how their software deals with palindromic abbreviations.</p><p>WTF FTW</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love the icon for this article .
I wonder how their software deals with palindromic abbreviations.WTF FTW</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love the icon for this article.
I wonder how their software deals with palindromic abbreviations.WTF FTW</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600930</id>
	<title>Re:how is this not original?</title>
	<author>Jedi Alec</author>
	<datestamp>1259843460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Next step: SLOL (saying LOL out loud)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next step : SLOL ( saying LOL out loud )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next step: SLOL (saying LOL out loud)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601682</id>
	<title>I HOPE I DON'T GET FINED</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259849580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>patent = {"LOL" : "laugh out loud"}<br>patent["LOL"]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>patent = { " LOL " : " laugh out loud " } patent [ " LOL " ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>patent = {"LOL" : "laugh out loud"}patent["LOL"]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602646</id>
	<title>Prior art</title>
	<author>bl968</author>
	<datestamp>1259858700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is code I used for an online web chat way back in 1996</p><p>$input\_text =~ s!( i )! I !g;<br>$input\_text =~ s!( np)!no problem\!!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!(AFK)!\*Away from keyboard\*!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!( wb)!Welcome back<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!(l8r)!See you later!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!(brb)!\*be right back\*!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!( bbl)!I will be back later!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!(bbiab)!I will be back in a bit!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!(btw)!by the way!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!( IRL )!\*in real life\*!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!(j\/k)!\*just kidding\*<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!(cya)!See you later!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!( oic)! Oh I see\!!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!(GTMA)!great minds think alike!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!(IMHO)!In my humble opinion!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!(PMFJI)!Pardon me for jumping in here!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!(wtg)!Way to go\!!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!(lol)!\*laughing out loud\*!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!(rofl)!\*rolling on the floor laughing\*!gi;<br>$input\_text =~ s!( aka )! also known as !gi;</p><p>Seems to meet all the definitions of the patent which means the patent meets all the specifications of patently obvious</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is code I used for an online web chat way back in 1996 $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( i ) !
I ! g ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( np ) ! no problem \ !
! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( AFK ) ! \ * Away from keyboard \ * ! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( wb ) ! Welcome back : ) ! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( l8r ) ! See you later ! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( brb ) ! \ * be right back \ * ! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( bbl ) ! I will be back later ! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( bbiab ) ! I will be back in a bit ! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( btw ) ! by the way ! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( IRL ) ! \ * in real life \ * ! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( j \ /k ) ! \ * just kidding \ * ; ) ! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( cya ) ! See you later ! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( oic ) !
Oh I see \ !
! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( GTMA ) ! great minds think alike ! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( IMHO ) ! In my humble opinion ! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( PMFJI ) ! Pardon me for jumping in here ! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( wtg ) ! Way to go \ !
! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( lol ) ! \ * laughing out loud \ * ! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( rofl ) ! \ * rolling on the floor laughing \ * ! gi ; $ input \ _text = ~ s !
( aka ) !
also known as ! gi ; Seems to meet all the definitions of the patent which means the patent meets all the specifications of patently obvious</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is code I used for an online web chat way back in 1996$input\_text =~ s!
( i )!
I !g;$input\_text =~ s!
( np)!no problem\!
!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
(AFK)!\*Away from keyboard\*!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
( wb)!Welcome back :)!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
(l8r)!See you later!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
(brb)!\*be right back\*!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
( bbl)!I will be back later!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
(bbiab)!I will be back in a bit!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
(btw)!by the way!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
( IRL )!\*in real life\*!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
(j\/k)!\*just kidding\* ;)!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
(cya)!See you later!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
( oic)!
Oh I see\!
!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
(GTMA)!great minds think alike!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
(IMHO)!In my humble opinion!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
(PMFJI)!Pardon me for jumping in here!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
(wtg)!Way to go\!
!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
(lol)!\*laughing out loud\*!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
(rofl)!\*rolling on the floor laughing\*!gi;$input\_text =~ s!
( aka )!
also known as !gi;Seems to meet all the definitions of the patent which means the patent meets all the specifications of patently obvious</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604982</id>
	<title>Re:The most trivial patent awarded so far?</title>
	<author>GameboyRMH</author>
	<datestamp>1262273580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Whats next, patenting the use of punctuation in sentances?</p></div><p>Dont ask its better in your court case if theres no evidence of looking into the existence of a patent and especially dont look at the patent Just trust me on this one you dont want to find yourself in my shoes your life will really be ruined</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whats next , patenting the use of punctuation in sentances ? Dont ask its better in your court case if theres no evidence of looking into the existence of a patent and especially dont look at the patent Just trust me on this one you dont want to find yourself in my shoes your life will really be ruined</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whats next, patenting the use of punctuation in sentances?Dont ask its better in your court case if theres no evidence of looking into the existence of a patent and especially dont look at the patent Just trust me on this one you dont want to find yourself in my shoes your life will really be ruined
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30608194</id>
	<title>IJTFO</title>
	<author>Nazlfrag</author>
	<datestamp>1262288280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's almost like a spellchecker, except it's not, but it is, but it's slightly different so it's not. Either way, neither should be patentable in a sane society. It's just too fucking obvious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's almost like a spellchecker , except it 's not , but it is , but it 's slightly different so it 's not .
Either way , neither should be patentable in a sane society .
It 's just too fucking obvious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's almost like a spellchecker, except it's not, but it is, but it's slightly different so it's not.
Either way, neither should be patentable in a sane society.
It's just too fucking obvious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601368</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604174</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Spacezilla</author>
	<datestamp>1262263320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fixing bad moderation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fixing bad moderation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fixing bad moderation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600780</id>
	<title>Re:UYK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259842500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about FU?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about FU ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about FU?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602400</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Darinbob</author>
	<datestamp>1259856300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know this still throws me.  I've learned over the years that it's the same as a smiley but for people half my age.  However whenever I see it I automatically get a negative opinion of the writer.  It just gets overused.  For instance, in a chat room someone says "had to reboot my computer lol" I wonder if they're simple in the head somehow to cause them to laugh out loud when their computer crashed?  It's a strange place to even put a smiley, and yet I see stuff like that all the time.  I see people who can't end a sentence without a lol on the end.  As soon as I lighten up a bit on it, someone uses it badly and I just start hating the lollers all over again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know this still throws me .
I 've learned over the years that it 's the same as a smiley but for people half my age .
However whenever I see it I automatically get a negative opinion of the writer .
It just gets overused .
For instance , in a chat room someone says " had to reboot my computer lol " I wonder if they 're simple in the head somehow to cause them to laugh out loud when their computer crashed ?
It 's a strange place to even put a smiley , and yet I see stuff like that all the time .
I see people who ca n't end a sentence without a lol on the end .
As soon as I lighten up a bit on it , someone uses it badly and I just start hating the lollers all over again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know this still throws me.
I've learned over the years that it's the same as a smiley but for people half my age.
However whenever I see it I automatically get a negative opinion of the writer.
It just gets overused.
For instance, in a chat room someone says "had to reboot my computer lol" I wonder if they're simple in the head somehow to cause them to laugh out loud when their computer crashed?
It's a strange place to even put a smiley, and yet I see stuff like that all the time.
I see people who can't end a sentence without a lol on the end.
As soon as I lighten up a bit on it, someone uses it badly and I just start hating the lollers all over again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601410</id>
	<title>just a contextual lookup-table</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259847180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>how is contextual lookup-table patentable?<br>isn't this being used already for language translation or in AI research as far as symbol to meaning lookup?<br>what about all the thousands of types of expert systems that use context to pick an answer for the problem from many. Same difference.<br>what about dictionaries, they already do this and show you all meanings though unless they are online/interactive, you still msut pick a meaning or acronym based on the usage context.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how is contextual lookup-table patentable ? is n't this being used already for language translation or in AI research as far as symbol to meaning lookup ? what about all the thousands of types of expert systems that use context to pick an answer for the problem from many .
Same difference.what about dictionaries , they already do this and show you all meanings though unless they are online/interactive , you still msut pick a meaning or acronym based on the usage context .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how is contextual lookup-table patentable?isn't this being used already for language translation or in AI research as far as symbol to meaning lookup?what about all the thousands of types of expert systems that use context to pick an answer for the problem from many.
Same difference.what about dictionaries, they already do this and show you all meanings though unless they are online/interactive, you still msut pick a meaning or acronym based on the usage context.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602078</id>
	<title>That's not what "schizophrenia" means</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259852940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Despite its etymology, schizophrenia is not the same as dissociative identity disorder, previously known as multiple personality disorder or split personality, with which it has been erroneously confused.", as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia's "schizophrenia" article</a> [wikipedia.org] notes.</p><p>Schizophrenia is a serious illness.  Using the term in this joking and inaccurate fashion is offensive to the people whose lives it affects.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Despite its etymology , schizophrenia is not the same as dissociative identity disorder , previously known as multiple personality disorder or split personality , with which it has been erroneously confused .
" , as Wikipedia 's " schizophrenia " article [ wikipedia.org ] notes.Schizophrenia is a serious illness .
Using the term in this joking and inaccurate fashion is offensive to the people whose lives it affects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Despite its etymology, schizophrenia is not the same as dissociative identity disorder, previously known as multiple personality disorder or split personality, with which it has been erroneously confused.
", as Wikipedia's "schizophrenia" article [wikipedia.org] notes.Schizophrenia is a serious illness.
Using the term in this joking and inaccurate fashion is offensive to the people whose lives it affects.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602242</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Chysn</author>
	<datestamp>1259854800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure LOL We are met on a great battle-field of that war LOL We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live LOL It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this ROTFLMFAO"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Now we are engaged in a great civil war , testing whether that nation , or any nation so conceived and so dedicated , can long endure LOL We are met on a great battle-field of that war LOL We have come to dedicate a portion of that field , as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live LOL It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this ROTFLMFAO "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure LOL We are met on a great battle-field of that war LOL We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live LOL It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this ROTFLMFAO"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604062</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262260320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought it meant Look Out Loser, which makes it even worse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it meant Look Out Loser , which makes it even worse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it meant Look Out Loser, which makes it even worse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600470</id>
	<title>LOL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259840460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh shit!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh shit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh shit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602448</id>
	<title>Re:UYK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259856660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Our military no longer can talk in acronyms.  Robin Williams will have to retract his bit in Good Morning Vietnam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Our military no longer can talk in acronyms .
Robin Williams will have to retract his bit in Good Morning Vietnam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our military no longer can talk in acronyms.
Robin Williams will have to retract his bit in Good Morning Vietnam.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601208</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>jhoegl</author>
	<datestamp>1259845440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Impossible, Al Gore didnt invent the internet for another two years!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Impossible , Al Gore didnt invent the internet for another two years !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Impossible, Al Gore didnt invent the internet for another two years!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601604</id>
	<title>I thought we were supposed to be nerds...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259848740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...who are smart about computer technology and such.</p><p>Why are there so many writeups that completely misinterpret their sources?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...who are smart about computer technology and such.Why are there so many writeups that completely misinterpret their sources ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...who are smart about computer technology and such.Why are there so many writeups that completely misinterpret their sources?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601600</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259848680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most people interpret LOL today as Laughing OnLine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most people interpret LOL today as Laughing OnLine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most people interpret LOL today as Laughing OnLine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600448</id>
	<title>I.B.M.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259840400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Incredible Bowel Movements</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Incredible Bowel Movements</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Incredible Bowel Movements</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600912</id>
	<title>Re:FWIW...</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1259843340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>However, if you have ever worked for a huge company like Intel, you are swimming in a veritable alphabet soup of unrecognizable acronyms every day. They make an acronym for everything over there. So something like this database would be a godsend in an environment like that.</p></div><p>It's called <a href="http://www.acronymfinder.com/" title="acronymfinder.com">acronymfinder.com</a> [acronymfinder.com], and it's been there for a <a href="http://blog.acronymfinder.com/2007/04/acronymfindercom-celebrates-ten-year.html" title="acronymfinder.com">long time</a> [acronymfinder.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , if you have ever worked for a huge company like Intel , you are swimming in a veritable alphabet soup of unrecognizable acronyms every day .
They make an acronym for everything over there .
So something like this database would be a godsend in an environment like that.It 's called acronymfinder.com [ acronymfinder.com ] , and it 's been there for a long time [ acronymfinder.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, if you have ever worked for a huge company like Intel, you are swimming in a veritable alphabet soup of unrecognizable acronyms every day.
They make an acronym for everything over there.
So something like this database would be a godsend in an environment like that.It's called acronymfinder.com [acronymfinder.com], and it's been there for a long time [acronymfinder.com].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600422</id>
	<title>LOL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259840280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There, I said it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There , I said it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There, I said it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600580</id>
	<title>YATMV!</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1259841060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your<br>Abbreviation<br>Translation<br>May<br>Vary</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>YourAbbreviationTranslationMayVary</tokentext>
<sentencetext>YourAbbreviationTranslationMayVary</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601624</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259848980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, that would be YSISHBIDNL. LOL means Laughing Out Loud.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , that would be YSISHBIDNL .
LOL means Laughing Out Loud .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, that would be YSISHBIDNL.
LOL means Laughing Out Loud.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600604</id>
	<title>Instant Lawsuit, You Can Too!</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1259841240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just paste this roll-over pop-up implementation into an HTML document to get sued:</p><blockquote><div><p> <tt>&lt;span title="What the F*ck"&gt;WTF&lt;/span&gt;</tt></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just paste this roll-over pop-up implementation into an HTML document to get sued : WTF</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just paste this roll-over pop-up implementation into an HTML document to get sued: WTF 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601374</id>
	<title>Cats</title>
	<author>Geoff</author>
	<datestamp>1259846880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm.... I thought LOL meant "<a href="http://www.lolcats.com/" title="lolcats.com">wow, that cat sure is cute</a> [lolcats.com]"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm.... I thought LOL meant " wow , that cat sure is cute [ lolcats.com ] "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm.... I thought LOL meant "wow, that cat sure is cute [lolcats.com]"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600590</id>
	<title>Bury the USPTO</title>
	<author>pubwvj</author>
	<datestamp>1259841180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>One more example of why the patent system needs to be eliminated. Let us invalidate \_all\_ patents, not just one other of theirs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One more example of why the patent system needs to be eliminated .
Let us invalidate \ _all \ _ patents , not just one other of theirs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One more example of why the patent system needs to be eliminated.
Let us invalidate \_all\_ patents, not just one other of theirs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600536</id>
	<title>Re:IMHO??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259840820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it means: I my humble opinion.</p><p>Get an IBM patented thesaurus, you douche!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it means : I my humble opinion.Get an IBM patented thesaurus , you douche !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it means: I my humble opinion.Get an IBM patented thesaurus, you douche!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600762</id>
	<title>Re:Whatis bot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259842380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So it would translate <br>
Lotus Notes: A email client that gives the overwhelming urge to kill yourself, similar to outlook.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So it would translate Lotus Notes : A email client that gives the overwhelming urge to kill yourself , similar to outlook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it would translate 
Lotus Notes: A email client that gives the overwhelming urge to kill yourself, similar to outlook.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604884</id>
	<title>Re:UYK</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1262273040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fun University?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fun University ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fun University?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600452</id>
	<title>This made me giggle</title>
	<author>Setral</author>
	<datestamp>1259840400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>November 2006 Fux et al</htmltext>
<tokenext>November 2006 Fux et al</tokentext>
<sentencetext>November 2006 Fux et al</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601178</id>
	<title>Re:The most trivial patent awarded so far?</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1259845260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Whats next, patenting the use of punctuation in sentances?</p></div><p>I suspect it will be patenting grammer...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whats next , patenting the use of punctuation in sentances ? I suspect it will be patenting grammer.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whats next, patenting the use of punctuation in sentances?I suspect it will be patenting grammer...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601164</id>
	<title>Disemvowel?</title>
	<author>crispin\_bollocks</author>
	<datestamp>1259845200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since prior art counts for little, has anyone rushed to patent disemvoweling?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since prior art counts for little , has anyone rushed to patent disemvoweling ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since prior art counts for little, has anyone rushed to patent disemvoweling?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604230</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262264460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LOL, it's 11 better than AOL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL , it 's 11 better than AOL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL, it's 11 better than AOL.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600476</id>
	<title>LOLLERSKATES!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259840520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IBM patented stupidity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IBM patented stupidity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IBM patented stupidity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600940</id>
	<title>ICQ</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259843520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and other IM's used to convert LOL, BRB, etc into faces, little signs or sounds years ago. Isn't that the same thing?</p><p>I'm sure there was some option where the short hand was translated onto the screen to its full meaning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and other IM 's used to convert LOL , BRB , etc into faces , little signs or sounds years ago .
Is n't that the same thing ? I 'm sure there was some option where the short hand was translated onto the screen to its full meaning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and other IM's used to convert LOL, BRB, etc into faces, little signs or sounds years ago.
Isn't that the same thing?I'm sure there was some option where the short hand was translated onto the screen to its full meaning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603908</id>
	<title>Re:It's the patent version of World War I</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262256600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"LOL"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" LOL "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"LOL"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600462</id>
	<title>Prior Spam Art</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1259840400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've seen many websites that robotically turn ad-targetable words into hyperlinks and/or roll-overs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen many websites that robotically turn ad-targetable words into hyperlinks and/or roll-overs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen many websites that robotically turn ad-targetable words into hyperlinks and/or roll-overs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602586</id>
	<title>Re:I.B.M.</title>
	<author>presidenteloco</author>
	<datestamp>1259857920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Inconceivably Big Mind"</p><p>as in "If it weren't for my Inconceivably Big Mind I wouldn't have been<br>able to think up expanding the acronyms using a lookup table!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Inconceivably Big Mind " as in " If it were n't for my Inconceivably Big Mind I would n't have beenable to think up expanding the acronyms using a lookup table !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Inconceivably Big Mind"as in "If it weren't for my Inconceivably Big Mind I wouldn't have beenable to think up expanding the acronyms using a lookup table!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600950</id>
	<title>Re:The most trivial patent awarded so far?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259843640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You need to know a few important things about IBM and patents (I work there):</p><p>1) Employees are given a bonus for submitting patents.  So any idea you have, if you can get it past the IBM review board, makes you money.  Expect stupid ideas to get through every once in a while.</p><p>2) IBM likes to brag about the size of its patent portfolio and they make a lot of money licensing it.  A bigger number (2500+ per year) sounds impressive and few people will actually look to see how many are really any good.</p><p>3) They usually won't enforce a stupid patent like this, but they'll use it against anyone that sues them as a defensive weapon.  (See the SCO case, although IBM dropped its counterclaims when they realized how ridiculous &amp; weak SCOs position was)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You need to know a few important things about IBM and patents ( I work there ) : 1 ) Employees are given a bonus for submitting patents .
So any idea you have , if you can get it past the IBM review board , makes you money .
Expect stupid ideas to get through every once in a while.2 ) IBM likes to brag about the size of its patent portfolio and they make a lot of money licensing it .
A bigger number ( 2500 + per year ) sounds impressive and few people will actually look to see how many are really any good.3 ) They usually wo n't enforce a stupid patent like this , but they 'll use it against anyone that sues them as a defensive weapon .
( See the SCO case , although IBM dropped its counterclaims when they realized how ridiculous &amp; weak SCOs position was )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You need to know a few important things about IBM and patents (I work there):1) Employees are given a bonus for submitting patents.
So any idea you have, if you can get it past the IBM review board, makes you money.
Expect stupid ideas to get through every once in a while.2) IBM likes to brag about the size of its patent portfolio and they make a lot of money licensing it.
A bigger number (2500+ per year) sounds impressive and few people will actually look to see how many are really any good.3) They usually won't enforce a stupid patent like this, but they'll use it against anyone that sues them as a defensive weapon.
(See the SCO case, although IBM dropped its counterclaims when they realized how ridiculous &amp; weak SCOs position was)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603658</id>
	<title>Read the FUCKING article.</title>
	<author>howlingfrog</author>
	<datestamp>1262292840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This IS NOT a patent on the use of abbreviations.<br>
This IS NOT a patent on the use of a lookup table to interpret abbreviations.<br>
This IS a patent on a specific algorithm for automatically creating multiple lookup tables for abbreviations.<br>
This IS a patent on a specific algorithm for deciding which lookup table to use based on who's talking to whom about what.<br>
<br>
It's far enough outside my area of expertise that I don't know if it's original enough and nonobvious enough to be patentable, but it is absolutely not an Amazon one-click situation.<br>
<br>
Editors, please actually read the articles and pay specific attention to whether or not they even vaguely match the submitter's summary.  As I mentioned before, this is not my area of expertise, and I had no trouble figuring out what was actually being patented.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This IS NOT a patent on the use of abbreviations .
This IS NOT a patent on the use of a lookup table to interpret abbreviations .
This IS a patent on a specific algorithm for automatically creating multiple lookup tables for abbreviations .
This IS a patent on a specific algorithm for deciding which lookup table to use based on who 's talking to whom about what .
It 's far enough outside my area of expertise that I do n't know if it 's original enough and nonobvious enough to be patentable , but it is absolutely not an Amazon one-click situation .
Editors , please actually read the articles and pay specific attention to whether or not they even vaguely match the submitter 's summary .
As I mentioned before , this is not my area of expertise , and I had no trouble figuring out what was actually being patented .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This IS NOT a patent on the use of abbreviations.
This IS NOT a patent on the use of a lookup table to interpret abbreviations.
This IS a patent on a specific algorithm for automatically creating multiple lookup tables for abbreviations.
This IS a patent on a specific algorithm for deciding which lookup table to use based on who's talking to whom about what.
It's far enough outside my area of expertise that I don't know if it's original enough and nonobvious enough to be patentable, but it is absolutely not an Amazon one-click situation.
Editors, please actually read the articles and pay specific attention to whether or not they even vaguely match the submitter's summary.
As I mentioned before, this is not my area of expertise, and I had no trouble figuring out what was actually being patented.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600586</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1259841120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, "lol" is now an anti-abbreviation for a period. For example:<br>"today i went to the store and got some orange juice lol"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , " lol " is now an anti-abbreviation for a period .
For example : " today i went to the store and got some orange juice lol "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, "lol" is now an anti-abbreviation for a period.
For example:"today i went to the store and got some orange juice lol"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603144</id>
	<title>wts?</title>
	<author>mister\_playboy</author>
	<datestamp>1259865300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The pic of three letters given to this story reads "wts" and not "wtf".  The last character is the archaic form of "s" when it is the last letter in a word.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The pic of three letters given to this story reads " wts " and not " wtf " .
The last character is the archaic form of " s " when it is the last letter in a word .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The pic of three letters given to this story reads "wts" and not "wtf".
The last character is the archaic form of "s" when it is the last letter in a word.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601420</id>
	<title>Re:how is this not original?</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1259847300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>ASa side note, my kids actually say LOL sometime with pronounciation of each letter, sometime as 'Lawl'. The are 9 and 11.</p> </div><p>Not surprising, considering how illiterate their father is.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>ASa side note , my kids actually say LOL sometime with pronounciation of each letter , sometime as 'Lawl' .
The are 9 and 11 .
Not surprising , considering how illiterate their father is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ASa side note, my kids actually say LOL sometime with pronounciation of each letter, sometime as 'Lawl'.
The are 9 and 11.
Not surprising, considering how illiterate their father is.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600676</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259841840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>YSISHBIDNL</htmltext>
<tokenext>YSISHBIDNL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>YSISHBIDNL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601928</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259851440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your System IV Sure Has Been Influential, Discover Netherlander's Linux!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your System IV Sure Has Been Influential , Discover Netherlander 's Linux !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your System IV Sure Has Been Influential, Discover Netherlander's Linux!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600758</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259842380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I blame grade inflation. Nowadays, "OMGWTFROTFLOL" means a faint smile.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I blame grade inflation .
Nowadays , " OMGWTFROTFLOL " means a faint smile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I blame grade inflation.
Nowadays, "OMGWTFROTFLOL" means a faint smile.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601276</id>
	<title>BS</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1259846040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>stfu, ibm. srsy, u gd bmf. afcps ur awb. ur afu.</htmltext>
<tokenext>stfu , ibm .
srsy , u gd bmf .
afcps ur awb .
ur afu .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>stfu, ibm.
srsy, u gd bmf.
afcps ur awb.
ur afu.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30609950</id>
	<title>Re:It's the patent version of World War I</title>
	<author>eddeye</author>
	<datestamp>1262254920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Because the more idiot patents like this that get granted, the sooner this mess will end.
<br>...<br>
First reason - the dumber a patent is, and the more obvious it is that you are merely patenting something someone else came up with - the more likely it is that a judge somewhere will get that clue we've all been waiting for.
<br>...<br>
Second reason - World War I.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Your logic is seriously misguided.

</p><p>
The current situation is in no way any judge's fault.  Shaky patents have to be litigated before they can be invalidated.  But why risk litigation?  Companies know which patents are shaky.  You'd never risk taking this patent to court.  It's much more effective to let the uncertainty hang over everyone's head, licensing the shaky patents as part of bulk portfolio cross-licensing arrangements with other major patent holders.

</p><p>
Even if this patent went to court, no judge would fix the entire patent mess in one fell swoop.  First, patents are invalidated by juries, not judges (except in rare cases of directed verdicts).  Second, no judge will eliminate an entire class of patents like software.  That would grossly overstep the bounds of any particular patent case before the judge.  Judges leave the broad strokes to Congress.  Such a ridiculously broad ruling from a district court would have to survive appeals to the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court.  So ultimately your solution requires not "a judge somewhere getting a clue", but five Supreme Court justices sanctioning a heavy-handed betrayal of hundreds of years of judicial authority and precedent.  "Not gonna happen" is an epic understatement.

</p><p>
As for "patent World War", that's just as improbable.  You said it yourself - companies care about making money.  Alliances between them are nothing like the mutual aid treaties that started WW1.  No one will rush to defend their allies as soon as it becomes unprofitable.  Your patent "war" will fizzle as soon as it starts.  Not to mention that if it somehow did, the resulting carnage to the Nasdaq would make things unpleasant for all of us.  You don't hammer an entire industry without collateral damage to every 401k and pension plan in existence.

</p><p>
Yes I am a patent lawyer.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the more idiot patents like this that get granted , the sooner this mess will end .
.. . First reason - the dumber a patent is , and the more obvious it is that you are merely patenting something someone else came up with - the more likely it is that a judge somewhere will get that clue we 've all been waiting for .
.. . Second reason - World War I . Your logic is seriously misguided .
The current situation is in no way any judge 's fault .
Shaky patents have to be litigated before they can be invalidated .
But why risk litigation ?
Companies know which patents are shaky .
You 'd never risk taking this patent to court .
It 's much more effective to let the uncertainty hang over everyone 's head , licensing the shaky patents as part of bulk portfolio cross-licensing arrangements with other major patent holders .
Even if this patent went to court , no judge would fix the entire patent mess in one fell swoop .
First , patents are invalidated by juries , not judges ( except in rare cases of directed verdicts ) .
Second , no judge will eliminate an entire class of patents like software .
That would grossly overstep the bounds of any particular patent case before the judge .
Judges leave the broad strokes to Congress .
Such a ridiculously broad ruling from a district court would have to survive appeals to the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court .
So ultimately your solution requires not " a judge somewhere getting a clue " , but five Supreme Court justices sanctioning a heavy-handed betrayal of hundreds of years of judicial authority and precedent .
" Not gon na happen " is an epic understatement .
As for " patent World War " , that 's just as improbable .
You said it yourself - companies care about making money .
Alliances between them are nothing like the mutual aid treaties that started WW1 .
No one will rush to defend their allies as soon as it becomes unprofitable .
Your patent " war " will fizzle as soon as it starts .
Not to mention that if it somehow did , the resulting carnage to the Nasdaq would make things unpleasant for all of us .
You do n't hammer an entire industry without collateral damage to every 401k and pension plan in existence .
Yes I am a patent lawyer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the more idiot patents like this that get granted, the sooner this mess will end.
...
First reason - the dumber a patent is, and the more obvious it is that you are merely patenting something someone else came up with - the more likely it is that a judge somewhere will get that clue we've all been waiting for.
...
Second reason - World War I.

Your logic is seriously misguided.
The current situation is in no way any judge's fault.
Shaky patents have to be litigated before they can be invalidated.
But why risk litigation?
Companies know which patents are shaky.
You'd never risk taking this patent to court.
It's much more effective to let the uncertainty hang over everyone's head, licensing the shaky patents as part of bulk portfolio cross-licensing arrangements with other major patent holders.
Even if this patent went to court, no judge would fix the entire patent mess in one fell swoop.
First, patents are invalidated by juries, not judges (except in rare cases of directed verdicts).
Second, no judge will eliminate an entire class of patents like software.
That would grossly overstep the bounds of any particular patent case before the judge.
Judges leave the broad strokes to Congress.
Such a ridiculously broad ruling from a district court would have to survive appeals to the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court.
So ultimately your solution requires not "a judge somewhere getting a clue", but five Supreme Court justices sanctioning a heavy-handed betrayal of hundreds of years of judicial authority and precedent.
"Not gonna happen" is an epic understatement.
As for "patent World War", that's just as improbable.
You said it yourself - companies care about making money.
Alliances between them are nothing like the mutual aid treaties that started WW1.
No one will rush to defend their allies as soon as it becomes unprofitable.
Your patent "war" will fizzle as soon as it starts.
Not to mention that if it somehow did, the resulting carnage to the Nasdaq would make things unpleasant for all of us.
You don't hammer an entire industry without collateral damage to every 401k and pension plan in existence.
Yes I am a patent lawyer.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602520</id>
	<title>IBM LOLs with MILFs?</title>
	<author>SoundGuyNoise</author>
	<datestamp>1259857380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What does IBM want with Little Old Ladies?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What does IBM want with Little Old Ladies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does IBM want with Little Old Ladies?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602262</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1259854980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "lots of love" is what someone told me too, when I was first starting out online.</p><p>Luckily, I didn't trust his expertise. Before I started using it, I checked for myself.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " lots of love " is what someone told me too , when I was first starting out online.Luckily , I did n't trust his expertise .
Before I started using it , I checked for myself .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "lots of love" is what someone told me too, when I was first starting out online.Luckily, I didn't trust his expertise.
Before I started using it, I checked for myself.
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601260</id>
	<title>Re:FWIW...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259845920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't it already part of the bsd-games package? The command is called "wtf"</p><p>$ which wtf<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/usr/games/wtf</p><p>$ wtf lol rotfl imho<br>LOL: laughing out loud<br>ROTFL: rolling on the floor laughing<br>IMHO: in my humble opinion</p><p>it also incorporates "man -k" (apropos) functionality:<br>$ wtf service<br>service: service (8)          - run a System V init script</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't it already part of the bsd-games package ?
The command is called " wtf " $ which wtf /usr/games/wtf $ wtf lol rotfl imhoLOL : laughing out loudROTFL : rolling on the floor laughingIMHO : in my humble opinionit also incorporates " man -k " ( apropos ) functionality : $ wtf serviceservice : service ( 8 ) - run a System V init script</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't it already part of the bsd-games package?
The command is called "wtf"$ which wtf /usr/games/wtf$ wtf lol rotfl imhoLOL: laughing out loudROTFL: rolling on the floor laughingIMHO: in my humble opinionit also incorporates "man -k" (apropos) functionality:$ wtf serviceservice: service (8)          - run a System V init script</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602468</id>
	<title>Re:It's the patent version of World War I</title>
	<author>RandomUsername99</author>
	<datestamp>1259856840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What you are saying completely makes sense, though judging from my experiences as a former IBMer, I'm willing to bet that their actions are more schizophrenic than one might hope. A lot of people don't realize how little communication there is among IBM's dizzying assortment of departments. The problem is in the way the company is structured.</p><p>Let's start at the top. When it comes to the large company wide decisions, IBM might not only seem to be adaptable, but downright agile compared to other companies that size. It seems to me like the guys who make the big picture decisions are pretty talented.</p><p>They're also so far up the ladder that when it comes to the daily operation of the company, they've got no clue what's going on. They're often more than 5 managers above your average developer.</p><p>Down at the other end of the company, you've got lots of really talented (there are always exceptions that make the rule) developers, technicians and other individual contributors that do the heavy lifting. They're often governed by smart dedicated 1st level managers that really know what's going on.</p><p>The problem is in the middle. It's like you've got the head of a genius, the arms and legs of an Olympian, and the torso of Mr. Creosote from Monty Python's Meaning of Life. (Let's add one more project manager... he's wafer thin!)</p><p>When it comes to the internal processes that IBM uses to conduct business on a day to day basis, they're in the stone age. The layers upon layers of dead-weight middle management seem to have no purpose other than delaying what you're doing so they can say they played a part in it, ensuring that they look good enough in the eyes of the middle manager above them to have a job next quarter. The hordes of inefficient yet needlessly automated processes, completely outdated tools, absurd politics, arbitrary policies and snails pace adaptation of updates and changes to the business processes make it very difficult to actually speak up and make a difference... and given the sheer volume of arbitrary policies that you may be violating at any given time without knowing it, it's not worth speaking up and giving some random middle manager with a grudge leverage to politically manipulate your department. From a practical day to day perspective, you really could view it as a oddly associated bunch of groups, that are bound together by bureaucracy, not dissimilar from the government in Terry Gilliam's movie Brazil.</p><p>For example:<br>Most people on Slashdot are probably aware of IBM's commendable commitment to transfer the entire company to Linux. I was very excited to learn that they had their own company endorsed/controlled internal Linux distro with all of the fixin's (Notes, etc) that we could install on our corporate workstations at our discretion. Being an upper level support guy who did a decent amount of scripting for customers who ran our Solaris based product, it was a much more appropriate choice for me than Windows. Everything worked great(or great-ish. I wasn't picky)! Now to install the ticket tracking system... Their idea of "updating" their ticket tracking system was making a screen scraping GUI that sat on top of a specific windows 3270 terminal emulator. I attempted to learn how to use the cryptic CLI/TUI application directly, but I was told by a support policy manager that the GUI program had been extended in ways that weren't supported by the terminal directly. "No problem" i thought "I'm a wine ninja... I can make it happen," no dice. Oh well, I was sure that they'd be coming out with a Linux version soon. After scouring the company intranet for more information, it turns out that there used to be a Linux version but it was permanently cancelled several years earlier because it was too difficult to maintain both branches. So I posted something in the product's board on the intranet asking if there was going to be a renewed interest in it as support was trying to get going with Linux, and the person who responded to the post (given I have no idea on what level they were inv</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What you are saying completely makes sense , though judging from my experiences as a former IBMer , I 'm willing to bet that their actions are more schizophrenic than one might hope .
A lot of people do n't realize how little communication there is among IBM 's dizzying assortment of departments .
The problem is in the way the company is structured.Let 's start at the top .
When it comes to the large company wide decisions , IBM might not only seem to be adaptable , but downright agile compared to other companies that size .
It seems to me like the guys who make the big picture decisions are pretty talented.They 're also so far up the ladder that when it comes to the daily operation of the company , they 've got no clue what 's going on .
They 're often more than 5 managers above your average developer.Down at the other end of the company , you 've got lots of really talented ( there are always exceptions that make the rule ) developers , technicians and other individual contributors that do the heavy lifting .
They 're often governed by smart dedicated 1st level managers that really know what 's going on.The problem is in the middle .
It 's like you 've got the head of a genius , the arms and legs of an Olympian , and the torso of Mr. Creosote from Monty Python 's Meaning of Life .
( Let 's add one more project manager... he 's wafer thin !
) When it comes to the internal processes that IBM uses to conduct business on a day to day basis , they 're in the stone age .
The layers upon layers of dead-weight middle management seem to have no purpose other than delaying what you 're doing so they can say they played a part in it , ensuring that they look good enough in the eyes of the middle manager above them to have a job next quarter .
The hordes of inefficient yet needlessly automated processes , completely outdated tools , absurd politics , arbitrary policies and snails pace adaptation of updates and changes to the business processes make it very difficult to actually speak up and make a difference... and given the sheer volume of arbitrary policies that you may be violating at any given time without knowing it , it 's not worth speaking up and giving some random middle manager with a grudge leverage to politically manipulate your department .
From a practical day to day perspective , you really could view it as a oddly associated bunch of groups , that are bound together by bureaucracy , not dissimilar from the government in Terry Gilliam 's movie Brazil.For example : Most people on Slashdot are probably aware of IBM 's commendable commitment to transfer the entire company to Linux .
I was very excited to learn that they had their own company endorsed/controlled internal Linux distro with all of the fixin 's ( Notes , etc ) that we could install on our corporate workstations at our discretion .
Being an upper level support guy who did a decent amount of scripting for customers who ran our Solaris based product , it was a much more appropriate choice for me than Windows .
Everything worked great ( or great-ish .
I was n't picky ) !
Now to install the ticket tracking system... Their idea of " updating " their ticket tracking system was making a screen scraping GUI that sat on top of a specific windows 3270 terminal emulator .
I attempted to learn how to use the cryptic CLI/TUI application directly , but I was told by a support policy manager that the GUI program had been extended in ways that were n't supported by the terminal directly .
" No problem " i thought " I 'm a wine ninja... I can make it happen , " no dice .
Oh well , I was sure that they 'd be coming out with a Linux version soon .
After scouring the company intranet for more information , it turns out that there used to be a Linux version but it was permanently cancelled several years earlier because it was too difficult to maintain both branches .
So I posted something in the product 's board on the intranet asking if there was going to be a renewed interest in it as support was trying to get going with Linux , and the person who responded to the post ( given I have no idea on what level they were inv</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What you are saying completely makes sense, though judging from my experiences as a former IBMer, I'm willing to bet that their actions are more schizophrenic than one might hope.
A lot of people don't realize how little communication there is among IBM's dizzying assortment of departments.
The problem is in the way the company is structured.Let's start at the top.
When it comes to the large company wide decisions, IBM might not only seem to be adaptable, but downright agile compared to other companies that size.
It seems to me like the guys who make the big picture decisions are pretty talented.They're also so far up the ladder that when it comes to the daily operation of the company, they've got no clue what's going on.
They're often more than 5 managers above your average developer.Down at the other end of the company, you've got lots of really talented (there are always exceptions that make the rule) developers, technicians and other individual contributors that do the heavy lifting.
They're often governed by smart dedicated 1st level managers that really know what's going on.The problem is in the middle.
It's like you've got the head of a genius, the arms and legs of an Olympian, and the torso of Mr. Creosote from Monty Python's Meaning of Life.
(Let's add one more project manager... he's wafer thin!
)When it comes to the internal processes that IBM uses to conduct business on a day to day basis, they're in the stone age.
The layers upon layers of dead-weight middle management seem to have no purpose other than delaying what you're doing so they can say they played a part in it, ensuring that they look good enough in the eyes of the middle manager above them to have a job next quarter.
The hordes of inefficient yet needlessly automated processes, completely outdated tools, absurd politics, arbitrary policies and snails pace adaptation of updates and changes to the business processes make it very difficult to actually speak up and make a difference... and given the sheer volume of arbitrary policies that you may be violating at any given time without knowing it, it's not worth speaking up and giving some random middle manager with a grudge leverage to politically manipulate your department.
From a practical day to day perspective, you really could view it as a oddly associated bunch of groups, that are bound together by bureaucracy, not dissimilar from the government in Terry Gilliam's movie Brazil.For example:Most people on Slashdot are probably aware of IBM's commendable commitment to transfer the entire company to Linux.
I was very excited to learn that they had their own company endorsed/controlled internal Linux distro with all of the fixin's (Notes, etc) that we could install on our corporate workstations at our discretion.
Being an upper level support guy who did a decent amount of scripting for customers who ran our Solaris based product, it was a much more appropriate choice for me than Windows.
Everything worked great(or great-ish.
I wasn't picky)!
Now to install the ticket tracking system... Their idea of "updating" their ticket tracking system was making a screen scraping GUI that sat on top of a specific windows 3270 terminal emulator.
I attempted to learn how to use the cryptic CLI/TUI application directly, but I was told by a support policy manager that the GUI program had been extended in ways that weren't supported by the terminal directly.
"No problem" i thought "I'm a wine ninja... I can make it happen," no dice.
Oh well, I was sure that they'd be coming out with a Linux version soon.
After scouring the company intranet for more information, it turns out that there used to be a Linux version but it was permanently cancelled several years earlier because it was too difficult to maintain both branches.
So I posted something in the product's board on the intranet asking if there was going to be a renewed interest in it as support was trying to get going with Linux, and the person who responded to the post (given I have no idea on what level they were inv</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602024</id>
	<title>Re:FWIW...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259852400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NASA, the king of acronyms, has prior art on this for sure!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA , the king of acronyms , has prior art on this for sure !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA, the king of acronyms, has prior art on this for sure!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600698</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259841960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you texting with blond hot girls, aren't you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you texting with blond hot girls , are n't you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you texting with blond hot girls, aren't you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600468</id>
	<title>how is this not original?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259840460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>while dumbing the concept down to lol to make it seem abd, lets think about it in a practicla manner.</p><p>A system that auomatically knows what a abbreviation means withine the given context would be pretty clever.</p><p>I ahe read documents ful of initals, sometime the SAME initials just different context.</p><p>LOL, 555, mdr. all those mean the same thing.</p><p>Also LOL is a place in france, LOL is short for Lack Of Love LOL is also short for memory.</p><p>ASa side note, my kids actually say LOL sometime with pronounciation of each letter, sometime as 'Lawl'. The are 9 and 11. So expect everyone around you to be saying it soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>while dumbing the concept down to lol to make it seem abd , lets think about it in a practicla manner.A system that auomatically knows what a abbreviation means withine the given context would be pretty clever.I ahe read documents ful of initals , sometime the SAME initials just different context.LOL , 555 , mdr .
all those mean the same thing.Also LOL is a place in france , LOL is short for Lack Of Love LOL is also short for memory.ASa side note , my kids actually say LOL sometime with pronounciation of each letter , sometime as 'Lawl' .
The are 9 and 11 .
So expect everyone around you to be saying it soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>while dumbing the concept down to lol to make it seem abd, lets think about it in a practicla manner.A system that auomatically knows what a abbreviation means withine the given context would be pretty clever.I ahe read documents ful of initals, sometime the SAME initials just different context.LOL, 555, mdr.
all those mean the same thing.Also LOL is a place in france, LOL is short for Lack Of Love LOL is also short for memory.ASa side note, my kids actually say LOL sometime with pronounciation of each letter, sometime as 'Lawl'.
The are 9 and 11.
So expect everyone around you to be saying it soon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601620</id>
	<title>Re:New rule!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259848920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read ".. one of your parents is invalidated by random draw". </p><p>Thought that sounded a bit harsh for a comment modded Interesting..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read " .. one of your parents is invalidated by random draw " .
Thought that sounded a bit harsh for a comment modded Interesting. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read ".. one of your parents is invalidated by random draw".
Thought that sounded a bit harsh for a comment modded Interesting..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600600</id>
	<title>FU!</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1259841240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear IBM,</p><p>FU!</p><p>- The Internet</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear IBM,FU ! - The Internet</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear IBM,FU!- The Internet</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600638</id>
	<title>But I likes the short form</title>
	<author>fyoder</author>
	<datestamp>1259841540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you click the graphic in the summary, you get a diagram of the translation.  It takes a short economical phrase, then expands it into a longer one.  What's wrong with economy?  Ok, perhaps there's some vocab learning that has to take place first, but I'm still doing that with English perpetually anyway -- I'll run across a word for which I'm uncertain of the meaning and I'll look it up in an online dictionary.  It's also safer to leave be, otherwise those poor parishioners at the <a href="http://lol.org/" title="lol.org">Lord of Love church</a> [lol.org] are going to have to change it's name to the Laughing Out Loud church.  Completely different vibe, though I think personally I would be more inclined to attend the latter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you click the graphic in the summary , you get a diagram of the translation .
It takes a short economical phrase , then expands it into a longer one .
What 's wrong with economy ?
Ok , perhaps there 's some vocab learning that has to take place first , but I 'm still doing that with English perpetually anyway -- I 'll run across a word for which I 'm uncertain of the meaning and I 'll look it up in an online dictionary .
It 's also safer to leave be , otherwise those poor parishioners at the Lord of Love church [ lol.org ] are going to have to change it 's name to the Laughing Out Loud church .
Completely different vibe , though I think personally I would be more inclined to attend the latter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you click the graphic in the summary, you get a diagram of the translation.
It takes a short economical phrase, then expands it into a longer one.
What's wrong with economy?
Ok, perhaps there's some vocab learning that has to take place first, but I'm still doing that with English perpetually anyway -- I'll run across a word for which I'm uncertain of the meaning and I'll look it up in an online dictionary.
It's also safer to leave be, otherwise those poor parishioners at the Lord of Love church [lol.org] are going to have to change it's name to the Laughing Out Loud church.
Completely different vibe, though I think personally I would be more inclined to attend the latter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602724</id>
	<title>Well, actually "wtf" does exactly that</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1259859840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is actually a command named "wtf" in my system (via fink) that does exactly the thing you/IBM mentions. Even with "over the net" update.</p><p><a href="http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/games/wtf/" title="netbsd.org">http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/games/wtf/</a> [netbsd.org]</p><p>While it is tagged as "game", it is really useful especially if you are in a ssh session and someone used a weird acronym.</p><p>If it is a co incidence that this story has "wtf" icon, it is really amazing<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) The command really does exactly what IBM says.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is actually a command named " wtf " in my system ( via fink ) that does exactly the thing you/IBM mentions .
Even with " over the net " update.http : //cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/games/wtf/ [ netbsd.org ] While it is tagged as " game " , it is really useful especially if you are in a ssh session and someone used a weird acronym.If it is a co incidence that this story has " wtf " icon , it is really amazing : ) The command really does exactly what IBM says .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is actually a command named "wtf" in my system (via fink) that does exactly the thing you/IBM mentions.
Even with "over the net" update.http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/games/wtf/ [netbsd.org]While it is tagged as "game", it is really useful especially if you are in a ssh session and someone used a weird acronym.If it is a co incidence that this story has "wtf" icon, it is really amazing :) The command really does exactly what IBM says.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602110</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Tynin</author>
	<datestamp>1259853240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yet Some Intellectually Small Humans Believe In Deceit, Not Learning.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet Some Intellectually Small Humans Believe In Deceit , Not Learning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet Some Intellectually Small Humans Believe In Deceit, Not Learning.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601338</id>
	<title>Oh, for the love of...</title>
	<author>Nekomusume</author>
	<datestamp>1259846580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can't somebody just patent the filing of stupid patents?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't somebody just patent the filing of stupid patents ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't somebody just patent the filing of stupid patents?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30633400</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>wgc</author>
	<datestamp>1231012740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Same with my Mother-in-law, but then I looked it up<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  apparently back when they used these sheets of compressed dried wood pulp and printed with handheld sticks containing ink or carbon black, LOL did indeed mean "Lots of Love".  Just ask wikipedia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Same with my Mother-in-law , but then I looked it up ... apparently back when they used these sheets of compressed dried wood pulp and printed with handheld sticks containing ink or carbon black , LOL did indeed mean " Lots of Love " .
Just ask wikipedia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same with my Mother-in-law, but then I looked it up ...  apparently back when they used these sheets of compressed dried wood pulp and printed with handheld sticks containing ink or carbon black, LOL did indeed mean "Lots of Love".
Just ask wikipedia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604438</id>
	<title>Couldn't they just publish the idea, not patent?</title>
	<author>niks42</author>
	<datestamp>1262268720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When submitting inventions in IBM, there used to be three possible outcomes. One was it got trashed. Another was it got filed. The third was that it would be published in the IBM Journal of Research and Development. This would protect IBM in the event of some other company filing some spurious patent, by clearly demonstrating prior art. Since I am now an ex-IBMerI don't know if this still happens these days.

Would  "publish" not be more appropriate for such a trivial "invention" as a look-up table, which should fail any test of obviousness?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When submitting inventions in IBM , there used to be three possible outcomes .
One was it got trashed .
Another was it got filed .
The third was that it would be published in the IBM Journal of Research and Development .
This would protect IBM in the event of some other company filing some spurious patent , by clearly demonstrating prior art .
Since I am now an ex-IBMerI do n't know if this still happens these days .
Would " publish " not be more appropriate for such a trivial " invention " as a look-up table , which should fail any test of obviousness ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When submitting inventions in IBM, there used to be three possible outcomes.
One was it got trashed.
Another was it got filed.
The third was that it would be published in the IBM Journal of Research and Development.
This would protect IBM in the event of some other company filing some spurious patent, by clearly demonstrating prior art.
Since I am now an ex-IBMerI don't know if this still happens these days.
Would  "publish" not be more appropriate for such a trivial "invention" as a look-up table, which should fail any test of obviousness?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603712</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Z00L00K</author>
	<datestamp>1262250720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if this patent application wasn't meant anything else than being the ultimate ironic attack on USPTO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this patent application was n't meant anything else than being the ultimate ironic attack on USPTO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this patent application wasn't meant anything else than being the ultimate ironic attack on USPTO.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</id>
	<title>lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259840040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"lol" hasn't meant anything close to "laughing out loud" for years. It's more like "your statement is slightly humorous, but I'm definitely not laughing".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" lol " has n't meant anything close to " laughing out loud " for years .
It 's more like " your statement is slightly humorous , but I 'm definitely not laughing " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"lol" hasn't meant anything close to "laughing out loud" for years.
It's more like "your statement is slightly humorous, but I'm definitely not laughing".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602042</id>
	<title>Analyse this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259852580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ROTFLMAO</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ROTFLMAO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ROTFLMAO</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600712</id>
	<title>Trillain?</title>
	<author>SomeWhiteGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1259842020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This patent is for the word correction feature that has been in Microsoft Word for years. This isn't original. Complete bunk!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This patent is for the word correction feature that has been in Microsoft Word for years .
This is n't original .
Complete bunk !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This patent is for the word correction feature that has been in Microsoft Word for years.
This isn't original.
Complete bunk!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600668</id>
	<title>Re:Whatis bot</title>
	<author>FooAtWFU</author>
	<datestamp>1259841840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This makes sense given IBM's propensity for naming all their products things like WCTME (Workplace Client Technology, Micro Edition). <p> See? I bet you thought the W was for WebSphere! (I know I did, until I checked it before posting.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This makes sense given IBM 's propensity for naming all their products things like WCTME ( Workplace Client Technology , Micro Edition ) .
See ? I bet you thought the W was for WebSphere !
( I know I did , until I checked it before posting .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This makes sense given IBM's propensity for naming all their products things like WCTME (Workplace Client Technology, Micro Edition).
See? I bet you thought the W was for WebSphere!
(I know I did, until I checked it before posting.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404</id>
	<title>The most trivial patent awarded so far?</title>
	<author>Phrogman</author>
	<datestamp>1259840220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this win some sort of stupidity award for the most ridiculous patenting of something that shouldn't be patentable? Whats next, patenting the use of punctuation in sentances?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this win some sort of stupidity award for the most ridiculous patenting of something that should n't be patentable ?
Whats next , patenting the use of punctuation in sentances ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this win some sort of stupidity award for the most ridiculous patenting of something that shouldn't be patentable?
Whats next, patenting the use of punctuation in sentances?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600414</id>
	<title>IMHO??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259840220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IMHO, IMHO means "In My Honest Opinion"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IMHO , IMHO means " In My Honest Opinion "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMHO, IMHO means "In My Honest Opinion"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600400</id>
	<title>Whatis bot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259840160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>as an IBM employee I use the "Whatis bot" all the time.  It is just a chat bot on Sametime chat inside Lotus Notes that allows you to message it an abbreviation and it tells you all the meanings.  This is very useful when you get an e-mail from a long time IBMer that knows every abbreviation and doesn't hesitate to use them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>as an IBM employee I use the " Whatis bot " all the time .
It is just a chat bot on Sametime chat inside Lotus Notes that allows you to message it an abbreviation and it tells you all the meanings .
This is very useful when you get an e-mail from a long time IBMer that knows every abbreviation and does n't hesitate to use them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as an IBM employee I use the "Whatis bot" all the time.
It is just a chat bot on Sametime chat inside Lotus Notes that allows you to message it an abbreviation and it tells you all the meanings.
This is very useful when you get an e-mail from a long time IBMer that knows every abbreviation and doesn't hesitate to use them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601536</id>
	<title>Re:IMHO??</title>
	<author>Velodra</author>
	<datestamp>1259848200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So you should say IMFO? Some people might misinterpret that as another common word that starts with F.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you should say IMFO ?
Some people might misinterpret that as another common word that starts with F .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you should say IMFO?
Some people might misinterpret that as another common word that starts with F.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600928</id>
	<title>Re:New rule! (and unintended consequences)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259843460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With this rule, companies will be motivated to submit as many semi-stupid patents as possible. That way, when the examiner decides that a patent is completely stupid, the other invalidated patent is likely to be a useless one that was created just as patent fodder.</p><p>Or maybe incorporate a bunch of shell corporations, and have each of those corporations apply for a single patent at a time. If it is completely stupid, there is no other patent to strike down. If it is granted, the shell corporation will sell it to the real corporation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With this rule , companies will be motivated to submit as many semi-stupid patents as possible .
That way , when the examiner decides that a patent is completely stupid , the other invalidated patent is likely to be a useless one that was created just as patent fodder.Or maybe incorporate a bunch of shell corporations , and have each of those corporations apply for a single patent at a time .
If it is completely stupid , there is no other patent to strike down .
If it is granted , the shell corporation will sell it to the real corporation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With this rule, companies will be motivated to submit as many semi-stupid patents as possible.
That way, when the examiner decides that a patent is completely stupid, the other invalidated patent is likely to be a useless one that was created just as patent fodder.Or maybe incorporate a bunch of shell corporations, and have each of those corporations apply for a single patent at a time.
If it is completely stupid, there is no other patent to strike down.
If it is granted, the shell corporation will sell it to the real corporation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603280</id>
	<title>Re:The most trivial patent awarded so far?</title>
	<author>ps2os2</author>
	<datestamp>1259867520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IBM has done this sort of thing for years. A few years ago I challenged an IBMer on the issue. The patent (if I recall correctly) was how to handle lines of people (queuing).</p><p>IBM seems to have an internal policy of brownie points for the number of patents an employee gets. I do not know if it gets them more research or what exactly as I haven't asked.</p><p>IBM also withdraws a lot of patents when it becomes obvious that the patent is less than lets say patentable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IBM has done this sort of thing for years .
A few years ago I challenged an IBMer on the issue .
The patent ( if I recall correctly ) was how to handle lines of people ( queuing ) .IBM seems to have an internal policy of brownie points for the number of patents an employee gets .
I do not know if it gets them more research or what exactly as I have n't asked.IBM also withdraws a lot of patents when it becomes obvious that the patent is less than lets say patentable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IBM has done this sort of thing for years.
A few years ago I challenged an IBMer on the issue.
The patent (if I recall correctly) was how to handle lines of people (queuing).IBM seems to have an internal policy of brownie points for the number of patents an employee gets.
I do not know if it gets them more research or what exactly as I haven't asked.IBM also withdraws a lot of patents when it becomes obvious that the patent is less than lets say patentable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600984</id>
	<title>Re:Whatis bot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259843880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aarrrrggggh! WTF! Sametime is not something in Notes! Notes is something that can accommodate Sametime as a hosted app. And I doubt that whatis has been updated in the past 10 years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aarrrrggggh !
WTF ! Sametime is not something in Notes !
Notes is something that can accommodate Sametime as a hosted app .
And I doubt that whatis has been updated in the past 10 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aarrrrggggh!
WTF! Sametime is not something in Notes!
Notes is something that can accommodate Sametime as a hosted app.
And I doubt that whatis has been updated in the past 10 years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600528</id>
	<title>Re:IMHO??</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1259840760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thot it was "humble", not "honest". Use "frankly" if you want it to mean "honest".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thot it was " humble " , not " honest " .
Use " frankly " if you want it to mean " honest " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thot it was "humble", not "honest".
Use "frankly" if you want it to mean "honest".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600672</id>
	<title>Please stop using WTF.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259841840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have been ordered by IBM to stop using WTF and RTFM as that use violates the patent.</p><p>I think that Slashdot should stop using the WTF on their page before IBM sues.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been ordered by IBM to stop using WTF and RTFM as that use violates the patent.I think that Slashdot should stop using the WTF on their page before IBM sues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been ordered by IBM to stop using WTF and RTFM as that use violates the patent.I think that Slashdot should stop using the WTF on their page before IBM sues.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603674</id>
	<title>Arrrrrggggghhhh</title>
	<author>Allnighterking</author>
	<datestamp>1262250060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My face found it impossible to reach my palm fast enough.  The reason no one else has patented it before is simple "IT'S BLOODY OBVIOUS".  Unless of course you're a USPTO examiner.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My face found it impossible to reach my palm fast enough .
The reason no one else has patented it before is simple " IT 'S BLOODY OBVIOUS " .
Unless of course you 're a USPTO examiner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My face found it impossible to reach my palm fast enough.
The reason no one else has patented it before is simple "IT'S BLOODY OBVIOUS".
Unless of course you're a USPTO examiner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600534</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>Mashiki</author>
	<datestamp>1259840820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been using these terms since 1992 for the most part, can I sue IBM now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been using these terms since 1992 for the most part , can I sue IBM now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been using these terms since 1992 for the most part, can I sue IBM now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600778</id>
	<title>Re:Prior Spam Art</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1259842500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Licklorred&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Licklorred &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Licklorred&gt;</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600682</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259841840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ya and WTF mean "Why The Face?" so I'm not sure why it's in your title.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ya and WTF mean " Why The Face ?
" so I 'm not sure why it 's in your title .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ya and WTF mean "Why The Face?
" so I'm not sure why it's in your title.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600430</id>
	<title>Interesting technchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259840280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF STFU RTFA LOLZ</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF STFU RTFA LOLZ</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF STFU RTFA LOLZ</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600454</id>
	<title>New rule!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259840400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>If a patent application is found to be completely stupid one of your other patents is invalidated by random draw!  *wishes*</htmltext>
<tokenext>If a patent application is found to be completely stupid one of your other patents is invalidated by random draw !
* wishes *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a patent application is found to be completely stupid one of your other patents is invalidated by random draw!
*wishes*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601210</id>
	<title>wtf</title>
	<author>zmjjmz</author>
	<datestamp>1259845440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's in the bsdgames package, and has been around for way more than the time required to qualify for prior art.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's in the bsdgames package , and has been around for way more than the time required to qualify for prior art .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's in the bsdgames package, and has been around for way more than the time required to qualify for prior art.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604110</id>
	<title>Look on the bright side</title>
	<author>m50d</author>
	<datestamp>1262261700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This means IBM will be able to stop people using it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This means IBM will be able to stop people using it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This means IBM will be able to stop people using it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600372</id>
	<title>UYK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259839980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hint: It's Scottish!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hint : It 's Scottish !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hint: It's Scottish!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600464</id>
	<title>WTF Indeed</title>
	<author>MightyMartian</author>
	<datestamp>1259840460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They've patented a dictionary?  That's what it looks like to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've patented a dictionary ?
That 's what it looks like to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've patented a dictionary?
That's what it looks like to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30605420</id>
	<title>Re:Whatis bot</title>
	<author>NobodyExpects</author>
	<datestamp>1262276280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>as an IBM employee I use the "Whatis bot" all the time. It is just a chat bot on Sametime chat inside Lotus Notes that allows you to message it an abbreviation and it tells you all the meanings. This is very useful when you get an e-mail from a long time IBMer that knows every abbreviation and doesn't hesitate to use them.</i></p> </div><p>As a long time customer of IBM, I'd love to have access to that tool. After all, I after reading my invoices, I always thought IBM stood for It'll Be More!

I'd rolf, but then would I owe IBM <i>more</i> money?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>as an IBM employee I use the " Whatis bot " all the time .
It is just a chat bot on Sametime chat inside Lotus Notes that allows you to message it an abbreviation and it tells you all the meanings .
This is very useful when you get an e-mail from a long time IBMer that knows every abbreviation and does n't hesitate to use them .
As a long time customer of IBM , I 'd love to have access to that tool .
After all , I after reading my invoices , I always thought IBM stood for It 'll Be More !
I 'd rolf , but then would I owe IBM more money ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> as an IBM employee I use the "Whatis bot" all the time.
It is just a chat bot on Sametime chat inside Lotus Notes that allows you to message it an abbreviation and it tells you all the meanings.
This is very useful when you get an e-mail from a long time IBMer that knows every abbreviation and doesn't hesitate to use them.
As a long time customer of IBM, I'd love to have access to that tool.
After all, I after reading my invoices, I always thought IBM stood for It'll Be More!
I'd rolf, but then would I owe IBM more money?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603860</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Alioth</author>
	<datestamp>1262254980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It also seems to be used as punctuation by some people - putting "lol" where a full stop usually may be found...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It also seems to be used as punctuation by some people - putting " lol " where a full stop usually may be found.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It also seems to be used as punctuation by some people - putting "lol" where a full stop usually may be found...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601118</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>crispin\_bollocks</author>
	<datestamp>1259844900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>they're doing it for the lulz</htmltext>
<tokenext>they 're doing it for the lulz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they're doing it for the lulz</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603736</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262251380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it not Loyal Orange Lodge?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it not Loyal Orange Lodge ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it not Loyal Orange Lodge?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602814</id>
	<title>IBM</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259860980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Irregular Bowel Movement</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Irregular Bowel Movement</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Irregular Bowel Movement</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602598</id>
	<title>Re:It's the patent version of World War I</title>
	<author>api\_syurga</author>
	<datestamp>1259858040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty soon.. people may decide to stop doing business with USA...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty soon.. people may decide to stop doing business with USA.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty soon.. people may decide to stop doing business with USA...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601128</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259845020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You lying sack of shit, your "co-workers uncle" did not say that to anyone.</p><p>You made that up.</p><p>LOL (lots of love),</p><p>Mom</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You lying sack of shit , your " co-workers uncle " did not say that to anyone.You made that up.LOL ( lots of love ) ,Mom</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You lying sack of shit, your "co-workers uncle" did not say that to anyone.You made that up.LOL (lots of love),Mom</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Brentyl</author>
	<datestamp>1259841600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This patent would have helped a co-worker of mine's uncle: He thought LOL meant "Lots of Love."</p><p>Pretty harmless, until he started using it inappropriately: "I'm so sorry to hear of your loss. LOL" or "You're better off without him anyway. LOL".</p><p>Apparently, they had to hold an intervention.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This patent would have helped a co-worker of mine 's uncle : He thought LOL meant " Lots of Love .
" Pretty harmless , until he started using it inappropriately : " I 'm so sorry to hear of your loss .
LOL " or " You 're better off without him anyway .
LOL " .Apparently , they had to hold an intervention .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This patent would have helped a co-worker of mine's uncle: He thought LOL meant "Lots of Love.
"Pretty harmless, until he started using it inappropriately: "I'm so sorry to hear of your loss.
LOL" or "You're better off without him anyway.
LOL".Apparently, they had to hold an intervention.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601368</id>
	<title>Re:FWIW...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259846820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That isn't the technology being patented.</p><p>Abstract from the linked patent page: "Electronic messaging systems, a machine-accessible medium, and methods for text-based electronic communication. In one embodiment, a plurality of databases are provided. The databases each define shorthand terms with one or more longhand terms. A shorthand term is targeted within a text message, and the databases are searched for corresponding longhand terms. The longhand terms are selected for display according to factors such as user preferences, the identities of participants to the text communication, and the context of the text message. Abbreviations, shorthand, and other jargon sent by one user is thereby interpreted. For example, one of the longhand terms may be substituted in-line with the text message. Alternatively, all matches for the shorthand term found in the databases may be listed in descending order according to relevancy. "</p><p>That is much more intelligent than just looking up an acronym in Google or at acronymfinder.com. And when combined with the cultural propensity of certain companies like Intel to make up acronyms on the fly that will never appear on a website because their use is limited to a couple of groups within a company, well, now this database seems pretty useful.</p><p>It isn't just a database. It also intercepts your messaging and provides you with the context that some developer in another department doesn't think to provide to you when he uses an acronym that everyone on his team uses but nobody else - anywhere - has ever heard of.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is n't the technology being patented.Abstract from the linked patent page : " Electronic messaging systems , a machine-accessible medium , and methods for text-based electronic communication .
In one embodiment , a plurality of databases are provided .
The databases each define shorthand terms with one or more longhand terms .
A shorthand term is targeted within a text message , and the databases are searched for corresponding longhand terms .
The longhand terms are selected for display according to factors such as user preferences , the identities of participants to the text communication , and the context of the text message .
Abbreviations , shorthand , and other jargon sent by one user is thereby interpreted .
For example , one of the longhand terms may be substituted in-line with the text message .
Alternatively , all matches for the shorthand term found in the databases may be listed in descending order according to relevancy .
" That is much more intelligent than just looking up an acronym in Google or at acronymfinder.com .
And when combined with the cultural propensity of certain companies like Intel to make up acronyms on the fly that will never appear on a website because their use is limited to a couple of groups within a company , well , now this database seems pretty useful.It is n't just a database .
It also intercepts your messaging and provides you with the context that some developer in another department does n't think to provide to you when he uses an acronym that everyone on his team uses but nobody else - anywhere - has ever heard of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That isn't the technology being patented.Abstract from the linked patent page: "Electronic messaging systems, a machine-accessible medium, and methods for text-based electronic communication.
In one embodiment, a plurality of databases are provided.
The databases each define shorthand terms with one or more longhand terms.
A shorthand term is targeted within a text message, and the databases are searched for corresponding longhand terms.
The longhand terms are selected for display according to factors such as user preferences, the identities of participants to the text communication, and the context of the text message.
Abbreviations, shorthand, and other jargon sent by one user is thereby interpreted.
For example, one of the longhand terms may be substituted in-line with the text message.
Alternatively, all matches for the shorthand term found in the databases may be listed in descending order according to relevancy.
"That is much more intelligent than just looking up an acronym in Google or at acronymfinder.com.
And when combined with the cultural propensity of certain companies like Intel to make up acronyms on the fly that will never appear on a website because their use is limited to a couple of groups within a company, well, now this database seems pretty useful.It isn't just a database.
It also intercepts your messaging and provides you with the context that some developer in another department doesn't think to provide to you when he uses an acronym that everyone on his team uses but nobody else - anywhere - has ever heard of.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602422</id>
	<title>Re:FWIW...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259856420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>many applications already translate those acronyms on the fly. IBM are patenting something that has existed in many apps for years. Hell even my old chat program I wrote had the option to turn on auto expansion of common acronyms for people that did not understand them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>many applications already translate those acronyms on the fly .
IBM are patenting something that has existed in many apps for years .
Hell even my old chat program I wrote had the option to turn on auto expansion of common acronyms for people that did not understand them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>many applications already translate those acronyms on the fly.
IBM are patenting something that has existed in many apps for years.
Hell even my old chat program I wrote had the option to turn on auto expansion of common acronyms for people that did not understand them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601722</id>
	<title>Seriously? A patent for an acronym list.</title>
	<author>doronbc</author>
	<datestamp>1259849820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somebody should send those IBMers a link to <a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=lol+acronym" title="lmgtfy.com" rel="nofollow">Let me google that for you</a> [lmgtfy.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody should send those IBMers a link to Let me google that for you [ lmgtfy.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody should send those IBMers a link to Let me google that for you [lmgtfy.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600880</id>
	<title>DIAF</title>
	<author>Greyfox</author>
	<datestamp>1259843220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To explain IBM's patent schizophrenia, the corporate stance may be against silly patents, but they pay their employees handsomely for getting a patent approved. Gaming the system is both lucrative and easy, so we get shit like this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To explain IBM 's patent schizophrenia , the corporate stance may be against silly patents , but they pay their employees handsomely for getting a patent approved .
Gaming the system is both lucrative and easy , so we get shit like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To explain IBM's patent schizophrenia, the corporate stance may be against silly patents, but they pay their employees handsomely for getting a patent approved.
Gaming the system is both lucrative and easy, so we get shit like this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604698</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262271600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the longest time I thought lol was just supposed to look like a stick guy cheering.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the longest time I thought lol was just supposed to look like a stick guy cheering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the longest time I thought lol was just supposed to look like a stick guy cheering.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601194</id>
	<title>Re:I.B.M.</title>
	<author>jhoegl</author>
	<datestamp>1259845380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Im a Big Mook
I Build Mustaches</htmltext>
<tokenext>Im a Big Mook I Build Mustaches</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Im a Big Mook
I Build Mustaches</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601180</id>
	<title>Re:IMHO??</title>
	<author>jhoegl</author>
	<datestamp>1259845320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its also ghetto for IMaHO</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its also ghetto for IMaHO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its also ghetto for IMaHO</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600910</id>
	<title>Re:The most trivial patent awarded so far?</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1259843340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For many people, "lol" <b>is</b> punctuation. As in "I went to the store and bought some chicken lol"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For many people , " lol " is punctuation .
As in " I went to the store and bought some chicken lol "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For many people, "lol" is punctuation.
As in "I went to the store and bought some chicken lol"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602026</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Tynin</author>
	<datestamp>1259852460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Damn google is quick to index. I went to search the interwebs to find out what YSISHBIDNL means, and I got 2 hits, both of them you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn google is quick to index .
I went to search the interwebs to find out what YSISHBIDNL means , and I got 2 hits , both of them you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn google is quick to index.
I went to search the interwebs to find out what YSISHBIDNL means, and I got 2 hits, both of them you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30611516</id>
	<title>Re:It's the patent version of World War I</title>
	<author>jez9999</author>
	<datestamp>1262268180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>What if a football team suddenly decided throwing passes was dishonorable, and they wished other people wouldn't do it? They'd get hammered. They'd lose all over the place.</i></p><p>Only in the US does this make sense.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if a football team suddenly decided throwing passes was dishonorable , and they wished other people would n't do it ?
They 'd get hammered .
They 'd lose all over the place.Only in the US does this make sense .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if a football team suddenly decided throwing passes was dishonorable, and they wished other people wouldn't do it?
They'd get hammered.
They'd lose all over the place.Only in the US does this make sense.
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600524</id>
	<title>I owe money lol.</title>
	<author>Greymoon</author>
	<datestamp>1259840760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I do this lol all the time lol. Who will keep track of this? lol Will I lol have to keep track? lol What if I mess up lol three times lol and then get banned lol from the internet? Where do I send the money lol. I will pay to type lol, lol.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do this lol all the time lol .
Who will keep track of this ?
lol Will I lol have to keep track ?
lol What if I mess up lol three times lol and then get banned lol from the internet ?
Where do I send the money lol .
I will pay to type lol , lol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do this lol all the time lol.
Who will keep track of this?
lol Will I lol have to keep track?
lol What if I mess up lol three times lol and then get banned lol from the internet?
Where do I send the money lol.
I will pay to type lol, lol.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604224</id>
	<title>'Lol' is just a dutch word</title>
	<author>xonen</author>
	<datestamp>1262264280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>'Lol' is a dutch word, meaning more or less 'fun' or 'funny'. You could say it instead of laughing, almost exactly like it is internationally used now in chat. Claiming it means 'laughing out loud' may explain the meaning, but is historic anything but correct.
<br> <br>
Way before internet existed, we used the word 'lol' in the classroom like this: we would use a simple digital calculator, hold it upside down, and while mentioning 'what you get when you add lol to lol', typed in 707 + 707 and the answer (upside down) would read 'hihi' (='haha' or 'hehe',...also in dutch).
<br> <br>
It's funny how people claim new meanings, or even 'inventing' an abbreviating. Whereas it's true roots are in dutch ppl saying 'lol' over some (international) chat, where it got picked up by you english speaking fellows.
<br> <br>
just fyi...</htmltext>
<tokenext>'Lol ' is a dutch word , meaning more or less 'fun ' or 'funny' .
You could say it instead of laughing , almost exactly like it is internationally used now in chat .
Claiming it means 'laughing out loud ' may explain the meaning , but is historic anything but correct .
Way before internet existed , we used the word 'lol ' in the classroom like this : we would use a simple digital calculator , hold it upside down , and while mentioning 'what you get when you add lol to lol ' , typed in 707 + 707 and the answer ( upside down ) would read 'hihi ' ( = 'haha ' or 'hehe',...also in dutch ) .
It 's funny how people claim new meanings , or even 'inventing ' an abbreviating .
Whereas it 's true roots are in dutch ppl saying 'lol ' over some ( international ) chat , where it got picked up by you english speaking fellows .
just fyi.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Lol' is a dutch word, meaning more or less 'fun' or 'funny'.
You could say it instead of laughing, almost exactly like it is internationally used now in chat.
Claiming it means 'laughing out loud' may explain the meaning, but is historic anything but correct.
Way before internet existed, we used the word 'lol' in the classroom like this: we would use a simple digital calculator, hold it upside down, and while mentioning 'what you get when you add lol to lol', typed in 707 + 707 and the answer (upside down) would read 'hihi' (='haha' or 'hehe',...also in dutch).
It's funny how people claim new meanings, or even 'inventing' an abbreviating.
Whereas it's true roots are in dutch ppl saying 'lol' over some (international) chat, where it got picked up by you english speaking fellows.
just fyi...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602374</id>
	<title>Re:The most trivial patent awarded so far?</title>
	<author>bloodhawk</author>
	<datestamp>1259856060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Whats next, patenting the use of punctuation in sentances?</p></div><p>At least<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. posters will be safe.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whats next , patenting the use of punctuation in sentances ? At least / .
posters will be safe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Whats next, patenting the use of punctuation in sentances?At least /.
posters will be safe.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602196</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259854440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your Story Is Somewhat Humorous But I Did Not Laugh?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your Story Is Somewhat Humorous But I Did Not Laugh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your Story Is Somewhat Humorous But I Did Not Laugh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602126</id>
	<title>I see lol as a visual icon, like a smiley</title>
	<author>rschwa</author>
	<datestamp>1259853600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always thought it looked like someone drowning. or surrendering.. you know<br>
&nbsp; o/ = waving hello or goodbye<br>\o/ = Yay!<br>o7 = a snappy salute<br>lol = dont shoot!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always thought it looked like someone drowning .
or surrendering.. you know   o/ = waving hello or goodbye \ o/ = Yay ! o7 = a snappy salutelol = dont shoot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always thought it looked like someone drowning.
or surrendering.. you know
  o/ = waving hello or goodbye\o/ = Yay!o7 = a snappy salutelol = dont shoot!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601326</id>
	<title>What did they patent?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259846460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A lookup table?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lookup table ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lookup table?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603728</id>
	<title>Re:It's the patent version of World War I</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1262250900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting point of view.  Another, more accurate point of view, is that anarchists intentionally wanted to start a war, and they succeeded.  Funny how anarchists escaped blame for the millions of deaths that followed.  Winners write the history books.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting point of view .
Another , more accurate point of view , is that anarchists intentionally wanted to start a war , and they succeeded .
Funny how anarchists escaped blame for the millions of deaths that followed .
Winners write the history books .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting point of view.
Another, more accurate point of view, is that anarchists intentionally wanted to start a war, and they succeeded.
Funny how anarchists escaped blame for the millions of deaths that followed.
Winners write the history books.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30605048</id>
	<title>Re:I.B.M.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262273940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Incontinentia Buttocks Machines.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Incontinentia Buttocks Machines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Incontinentia Buttocks Machines.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601312</id>
	<title>Simple Solution, Patent Pending</title>
	<author>BlueCoder</author>
	<datestamp>1259846340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's lobby the patent office to create a wiki for lay man ideas.  Then everyone normal that can't afford to patent every blog article that they can come up with on a daily basis can then upload their ideas to the database.</p><p>This should eliminate all patents for obvious stuff.  And only the 10 or so really original ideas are still patentable.</p><p>Simple solution, maybe I should patent it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's lobby the patent office to create a wiki for lay man ideas .
Then everyone normal that ca n't afford to patent every blog article that they can come up with on a daily basis can then upload their ideas to the database.This should eliminate all patents for obvious stuff .
And only the 10 or so really original ideas are still patentable.Simple solution , maybe I should patent it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's lobby the patent office to create a wiki for lay man ideas.
Then everyone normal that can't afford to patent every blog article that they can come up with on a daily basis can then upload their ideas to the database.This should eliminate all patents for obvious stuff.
And only the 10 or so really original ideas are still patentable.Simple solution, maybe I should patent it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601772</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259850300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My coworker's wife initially thought wtf was "Wow, that's funny." He set her straight . . . after a while<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>My coworker 's wife initially thought wtf was " Wow , that 's funny .
" He set her straight .
. .
after a while ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My coworker's wife initially thought wtf was "Wow, that's funny.
" He set her straight .
. .
after a while ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30608374</id>
	<title>Re:It's the patent version of World War I</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262289180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice analogy, though WWI was far more complicated than an assasination. Shit was going to go down regardless over Serbia and the same cards would have fallen. It was inevitable, the assasination was not a neccessary catylyst, it just worked out that way. Same here, their house of cards will fall regardless of a breeze, it will just get too ludicrously shaped to stand up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice analogy , though WWI was far more complicated than an assasination .
Shit was going to go down regardless over Serbia and the same cards would have fallen .
It was inevitable , the assasination was not a neccessary catylyst , it just worked out that way .
Same here , their house of cards will fall regardless of a breeze , it will just get too ludicrously shaped to stand up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice analogy, though WWI was far more complicated than an assasination.
Shit was going to go down regardless over Serbia and the same cards would have fallen.
It was inevitable, the assasination was not a neccessary catylyst, it just worked out that way.
Same here, their house of cards will fall regardless of a breeze, it will just get too ludicrously shaped to stand up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601428</id>
	<title>Re:I.B.M.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259847300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's Been Mangled...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's Been Mangled.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's Been Mangled...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600450</id>
	<title>wtf is ibm?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259840400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>omg cbit.wtf?watp?they r jk?lmfao&amp;rofl</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>omg cbit.wtf ? watp ? they r jk ? lmfao&amp;rofl</tokentext>
<sentencetext>omg cbit.wtf?watp?they r jk?lmfao&amp;rofl</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601414</id>
	<title>Re:The most trivial patent awarded so far?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259847240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Whats next, patenting the use of punctuation in sentances?</p></div><p>So all of these punctuation-less posts by <a href="http://slashdot.org/~CircleTimesSquare" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">CircleTimesSquare</a> [slashdot.org] were just a way for him to prepare for the inevitable?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whats next , patenting the use of punctuation in sentances ? So all of these punctuation-less posts by CircleTimesSquare [ slashdot.org ] were just a way for him to prepare for the inevitable ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whats next, patenting the use of punctuation in sentances?So all of these punctuation-less posts by CircleTimesSquare [slashdot.org] were just a way for him to prepare for the inevitable?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601438</id>
	<title>Re:lol = laughing out loud? WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259847420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder what he thought ROTFL meant?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what he thought ROTFL meant ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder what he thought ROTFL meant?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600402</id>
	<title>OMG</title>
	<author>Airdorn</author>
	<datestamp>1259840160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>OMFG! (tm)</htmltext>
<tokenext>OMFG !
( tm )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMFG!
(tm)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30605146</id>
	<title>IBM, please patent this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262274660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>UYA = Up Your As*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>UYA = Up Your As *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>UYA = Up Your As*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600506</id>
	<title>Did IBM just patent every geek's head?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259840640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I do those translations in my head. My memory is the database. Does that mean I owe IBM royalties?</p><p>I can't believe they just patented the lookup table, albeit in a very specific context.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do those translations in my head .
My memory is the database .
Does that mean I owe IBM royalties ? I ca n't believe they just patented the lookup table , albeit in a very specific context .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do those translations in my head.
My memory is the database.
Does that mean I owe IBM royalties?I can't believe they just patented the lookup table, albeit in a very specific context.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30610096</id>
	<title>Not harsh enough.</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1262255820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear IBM:</p><p>FOAD</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear IBM : FOAD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear IBM:FOAD</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601034</id>
	<title>Done years ago</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259844300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In text-to-speech systems.    It's a classic problem when you're building software to read text: you have to decide whether to "read" an acronym or "spell" it.  For instance "RADAR" is read as a word and "IBM" is spelled out.     An excellent example is "St."  Is that "Saint" as in "Saint Louis" or "St." as in "Elm Street"?</p><p>You'll find the "St." example in a lot of papers and books on computer speech synthesis.   It was a well-known problem in 1999 at Bell Labs, and more-or-less solved.   (Obviously, you'll never get every instance right, but we had algorithms that were pretty good.)  Look for "Richard Sproat," probably.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In text-to-speech systems .
It 's a classic problem when you 're building software to read text : you have to decide whether to " read " an acronym or " spell " it .
For instance " RADAR " is read as a word and " IBM " is spelled out .
An excellent example is " St. " Is that " Saint " as in " Saint Louis " or " St. " as in " Elm Street " ? You 'll find the " St. " example in a lot of papers and books on computer speech synthesis .
It was a well-known problem in 1999 at Bell Labs , and more-or-less solved .
( Obviously , you 'll never get every instance right , but we had algorithms that were pretty good .
) Look for " Richard Sproat , " probably .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In text-to-speech systems.
It's a classic problem when you're building software to read text: you have to decide whether to "read" an acronym or "spell" it.
For instance "RADAR" is read as a word and "IBM" is spelled out.
An excellent example is "St."  Is that "Saint" as in "Saint Louis" or "St." as in "Elm Street"?You'll find the "St." example in a lot of papers and books on computer speech synthesis.
It was a well-known problem in 1999 at Bell Labs, and more-or-less solved.
(Obviously, you'll never get every instance right, but we had algorithms that were pretty good.
)  Look for "Richard Sproat," probably.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600810</id>
	<title>Re:Did IBM just patent every geek's head?</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1259842740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I do those translations in my head. My memory is the database. Does that mean I owe IBM royalties?</p></div><p>Yes. And you owe me, services rendered, for answering your question.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do those translations in my head .
My memory is the database .
Does that mean I owe IBM royalties ? Yes .
And you owe me , services rendered , for answering your question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do those translations in my head.
My memory is the database.
Does that mean I owe IBM royalties?Yes.
And you owe me, services rendered, for answering your question.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602750</id>
	<title>Prior Art</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259860020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q\_code, patent invalidated , case closed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q \ _code , patent invalidated , case closed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q\_code, patent invalidated , case closed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603186</id>
	<title>I did this in the 1990s</title>
	<author>Joe U</author>
	<datestamp>1259866020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously,</p><p>How is this different from the old Galacticomm "action commands" in the chat rooms?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/l You're funny turns into "Joe User laughs out loud 'You're funny'. (Done in 1992)<br>The commands could be customized or turned off as well, also they could change based on the person doing it.</p><p>Or how about when developers at my company turned<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) into graphics for smileys in realtime web chat (in 1996).</p><p>So, what are they trying to patent?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously,How is this different from the old Galacticomm " action commands " in the chat rooms ?
/l You 're funny turns into " Joe User laughs out loud 'You 're funny' .
( Done in 1992 ) The commands could be customized or turned off as well , also they could change based on the person doing it.Or how about when developers at my company turned : ) into graphics for smileys in realtime web chat ( in 1996 ) .So , what are they trying to patent ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously,How is this different from the old Galacticomm "action commands" in the chat rooms?
/l You're funny turns into "Joe User laughs out loud 'You're funny'.
(Done in 1992)The commands could be customized or turned off as well, also they could change based on the person doing it.Or how about when developers at my company turned :) into graphics for smileys in realtime web chat (in 1996).So, what are they trying to patent?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600776</id>
	<title>FWIW...</title>
	<author>guspasho</author>
	<datestamp>1259842500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For those of you who didn't RTFA, they didn't patent LOL, but the process of using a database to tell you what LOL means, or something along those lines. Not quite as absurd, but still silly.</p><p>However, if you have ever worked for a huge company like Intel, you are swimming in a veritable alphabet soup of unrecognizable acronyms every day. They make an acronym for everything over there. So something like this database would be a godsend in an environment like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those of you who did n't RTFA , they did n't patent LOL , but the process of using a database to tell you what LOL means , or something along those lines .
Not quite as absurd , but still silly.However , if you have ever worked for a huge company like Intel , you are swimming in a veritable alphabet soup of unrecognizable acronyms every day .
They make an acronym for everything over there .
So something like this database would be a godsend in an environment like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those of you who didn't RTFA, they didn't patent LOL, but the process of using a database to tell you what LOL means, or something along those lines.
Not quite as absurd, but still silly.However, if you have ever worked for a huge company like Intel, you are swimming in a veritable alphabet soup of unrecognizable acronyms every day.
They make an acronym for everything over there.
So something like this database would be a godsend in an environment like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144</id>
	<title>It's the patent version of World War I</title>
	<author>Weaselmancer</author>
	<datestamp>1259845080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't blame IBM.  They're not "schizophrenic".  They are merely in the game playing by the rules as they are written, because that's what everyone else on the field is doing.  What if a football team suddenly decided throwing passes was dishonorable, and they wished other people wouldn't do it?  They'd get hammered.  They'd lose all over the place.

</p><p>Same for IBM.  They can wish for change and still play a mean game.  Nothing wrong with that at all.  In fact - the more the merrier, says I.  Why?  Because the more idiot patents like this that get granted, the sooner this mess will end.  For two reasons.

</p><p>First reason - the dumber a patent is, and the more obvious it is that you are merely patenting something someone else came up with - the more likely it is that a judge somewhere will get that clue we've all been waiting for.

</p><p>Second reason - World War I.

</p><p>How did WWI start?  The assassination of Franz Ferdinand of Austria.  A single death.  That's all it took.  All of the alliances and counter-alliances of the time made an extremely unstable system.  All it took was the right nudge, a single assassination, and all those alliances got called up.  Countries picked sides and it was off to war.  Where 15 million people died.  Imagine that.  Fifteen million people all killed, and it all traces to a single assassination.

</p><p>Remind you of anything?

</p><p>All of these companies today have these IP portfolios, and an uneasy truce in between them that says "you nail us and we'll nail you".  Strategic partnerships, licensed IP - a tangled web of legal rights.  Just like the tangled web of alliances pre-WWI.

</p><p>All it will take is our Ferdinand.

</p><p>Remember the hubub over the FAT file system, how MS holds the patent on it?  Why aren't they suing everyone for their legally due royalties?  They could nail everyone from Samsung to Nokia.  So why not do it?  Because everyone would nail MS for other trivial things they are in violation of.  It would be Patent WW I.

</p><p>So let these companies patent trivial crap like LOL.  Why not?  It will make the crater bigger when The Big One happens.  And nobody wants that because in this case it won't be soldiers dying, it will be money evaporating.  IP portfolios are insanely overpriced.  If PWI happens, the courts will be *swamped*.  The only fix will be to invalidate software/process patents or spend every single minute of court time available until 2142 sorting out the mess.  And that means those portfolios will suddenly be useless.  As will all the license agreements.  That's a lot of money to go *poof*.  It'll make the housing market bubble of 2008 look like a hiccup.  We're talking many many billions of dollars here.

</p><p>So let the current cold war continue.  Go ahead.  Patent LOL.  Patent emoticons.  Patent tying your right shoe before your left - I don't care.

</p><p>Just know that it's going to end, it's going to end soon, and it's going to end badly.  And there will be blame enough to go around for everyone.  In fact, the end may be beginning right now.  <a href="http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=apple+nokia+patent+infringement&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ei=aeg7S9vLJovllQfUq5GZBw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=news\_group&amp;ct=title&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CAwQsQQwAA" title="google.com">We may have had our Ferdinand just recently.</a> [google.com]

</p><p>It's going to be a hell of a ride when this whole mess hits the fan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't blame IBM .
They 're not " schizophrenic " .
They are merely in the game playing by the rules as they are written , because that 's what everyone else on the field is doing .
What if a football team suddenly decided throwing passes was dishonorable , and they wished other people would n't do it ?
They 'd get hammered .
They 'd lose all over the place .
Same for IBM .
They can wish for change and still play a mean game .
Nothing wrong with that at all .
In fact - the more the merrier , says I. Why ? Because the more idiot patents like this that get granted , the sooner this mess will end .
For two reasons .
First reason - the dumber a patent is , and the more obvious it is that you are merely patenting something someone else came up with - the more likely it is that a judge somewhere will get that clue we 've all been waiting for .
Second reason - World War I . How did WWI start ?
The assassination of Franz Ferdinand of Austria .
A single death .
That 's all it took .
All of the alliances and counter-alliances of the time made an extremely unstable system .
All it took was the right nudge , a single assassination , and all those alliances got called up .
Countries picked sides and it was off to war .
Where 15 million people died .
Imagine that .
Fifteen million people all killed , and it all traces to a single assassination .
Remind you of anything ?
All of these companies today have these IP portfolios , and an uneasy truce in between them that says " you nail us and we 'll nail you " .
Strategic partnerships , licensed IP - a tangled web of legal rights .
Just like the tangled web of alliances pre-WWI .
All it will take is our Ferdinand .
Remember the hubub over the FAT file system , how MS holds the patent on it ?
Why are n't they suing everyone for their legally due royalties ?
They could nail everyone from Samsung to Nokia .
So why not do it ?
Because everyone would nail MS for other trivial things they are in violation of .
It would be Patent WW I . So let these companies patent trivial crap like LOL .
Why not ?
It will make the crater bigger when The Big One happens .
And nobody wants that because in this case it wo n't be soldiers dying , it will be money evaporating .
IP portfolios are insanely overpriced .
If PWI happens , the courts will be * swamped * .
The only fix will be to invalidate software/process patents or spend every single minute of court time available until 2142 sorting out the mess .
And that means those portfolios will suddenly be useless .
As will all the license agreements .
That 's a lot of money to go * poof * .
It 'll make the housing market bubble of 2008 look like a hiccup .
We 're talking many many billions of dollars here .
So let the current cold war continue .
Go ahead .
Patent LOL .
Patent emoticons .
Patent tying your right shoe before your left - I do n't care .
Just know that it 's going to end , it 's going to end soon , and it 's going to end badly .
And there will be blame enough to go around for everyone .
In fact , the end may be beginning right now .
We may have had our Ferdinand just recently .
[ google.com ] It 's going to be a hell of a ride when this whole mess hits the fan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't blame IBM.
They're not "schizophrenic".
They are merely in the game playing by the rules as they are written, because that's what everyone else on the field is doing.
What if a football team suddenly decided throwing passes was dishonorable, and they wished other people wouldn't do it?
They'd get hammered.
They'd lose all over the place.
Same for IBM.
They can wish for change and still play a mean game.
Nothing wrong with that at all.
In fact - the more the merrier, says I.  Why?  Because the more idiot patents like this that get granted, the sooner this mess will end.
For two reasons.
First reason - the dumber a patent is, and the more obvious it is that you are merely patenting something someone else came up with - the more likely it is that a judge somewhere will get that clue we've all been waiting for.
Second reason - World War I.

How did WWI start?
The assassination of Franz Ferdinand of Austria.
A single death.
That's all it took.
All of the alliances and counter-alliances of the time made an extremely unstable system.
All it took was the right nudge, a single assassination, and all those alliances got called up.
Countries picked sides and it was off to war.
Where 15 million people died.
Imagine that.
Fifteen million people all killed, and it all traces to a single assassination.
Remind you of anything?
All of these companies today have these IP portfolios, and an uneasy truce in between them that says "you nail us and we'll nail you".
Strategic partnerships, licensed IP - a tangled web of legal rights.
Just like the tangled web of alliances pre-WWI.
All it will take is our Ferdinand.
Remember the hubub over the FAT file system, how MS holds the patent on it?
Why aren't they suing everyone for their legally due royalties?
They could nail everyone from Samsung to Nokia.
So why not do it?
Because everyone would nail MS for other trivial things they are in violation of.
It would be Patent WW I.

So let these companies patent trivial crap like LOL.
Why not?
It will make the crater bigger when The Big One happens.
And nobody wants that because in this case it won't be soldiers dying, it will be money evaporating.
IP portfolios are insanely overpriced.
If PWI happens, the courts will be *swamped*.
The only fix will be to invalidate software/process patents or spend every single minute of court time available until 2142 sorting out the mess.
And that means those portfolios will suddenly be useless.
As will all the license agreements.
That's a lot of money to go *poof*.
It'll make the housing market bubble of 2008 look like a hiccup.
We're talking many many billions of dollars here.
So let the current cold war continue.
Go ahead.
Patent LOL.
Patent emoticons.
Patent tying your right shoe before your left - I don't care.
Just know that it's going to end, it's going to end soon, and it's going to end badly.
And there will be blame enough to go around for everyone.
In fact, the end may be beginning right now.
We may have had our Ferdinand just recently.
[google.com]

It's going to be a hell of a ride when this whole mess hits the fan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603028</id>
	<title>This patent is tagged ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1259864040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>ROTFLMAO</htmltext>
<tokenext>ROTFLMAO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ROTFLMAO</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601858</id>
	<title>Re:The most trivial patent awarded so far?</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1259850780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Whats next, patenting the use of punctuation in sentances?</p></div><p>There's not nearly as much potential infringement for punctuation, as say, common misspellings.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whats next , patenting the use of punctuation in sentances ? There 's not nearly as much potential infringement for punctuation , as say , common misspellings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whats next, patenting the use of punctuation in sentances?There's not nearly as much potential infringement for punctuation, as say, common misspellings.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30611516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603712
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30609950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602598
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600910
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30608374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30633400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30608194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30610096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30605048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30605420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_166220_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601210
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600528
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601536
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600590
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30605420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600984
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600476
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600928
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30610096
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602646
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600940
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30608374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30609950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30611516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600422
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600402
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600672
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600912
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601368
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30608194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601260
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600676
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601928
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602196
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602110
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600640
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601772
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601438
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604230
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30633400
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601128
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602262
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603712
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601624
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600778
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600780
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601276
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30604982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602374
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30603144
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601208
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_166220.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30600448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30602586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30601428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_166220.30605048
</commentlist>
</conversation>
