<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_28_1641208</id>
	<title>Extinct Ibex Resurrected By Cloning</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1261991040000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>The Telegraph is reporting that for the first time an extinct animal has been <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/4409958/Extinct-ibex-is-resurrected-by-cloning.html">brought back via cloning</a>.  The Pyrenean ibex, a type of mountain goat, was declared officially extinct in 2000, but thanks to preserved skin samples scientists were able to insert that DNA into eggs from domestic goats to clone a female Pyrenean ibex.  While the goat didn't survive long due to lung defects this gives scientists hopes that it will be possible to resurrect extinct species from frozen tissue.  <i>"Using techniques similar to those used to clone Dolly the sheep, known as nuclear transfer, the researchers were able to transplant DNA from the tissue into eggs taken from domestic goats to create 439 embryos, of which 57 were implanted into surrogate females.  Just seven of the embryos resulted in pregnancies and only one of the goats finally gave birth to a female bucardo, which died seven minutes later due to breathing difficulties, perhaps due to flaws in the DNA used to create the clone."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Telegraph is reporting that for the first time an extinct animal has been brought back via cloning .
The Pyrenean ibex , a type of mountain goat , was declared officially extinct in 2000 , but thanks to preserved skin samples scientists were able to insert that DNA into eggs from domestic goats to clone a female Pyrenean ibex .
While the goat did n't survive long due to lung defects this gives scientists hopes that it will be possible to resurrect extinct species from frozen tissue .
" Using techniques similar to those used to clone Dolly the sheep , known as nuclear transfer , the researchers were able to transplant DNA from the tissue into eggs taken from domestic goats to create 439 embryos , of which 57 were implanted into surrogate females .
Just seven of the embryos resulted in pregnancies and only one of the goats finally gave birth to a female bucardo , which died seven minutes later due to breathing difficulties , perhaps due to flaws in the DNA used to create the clone .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Telegraph is reporting that for the first time an extinct animal has been brought back via cloning.
The Pyrenean ibex, a type of mountain goat, was declared officially extinct in 2000, but thanks to preserved skin samples scientists were able to insert that DNA into eggs from domestic goats to clone a female Pyrenean ibex.
While the goat didn't survive long due to lung defects this gives scientists hopes that it will be possible to resurrect extinct species from frozen tissue.
"Using techniques similar to those used to clone Dolly the sheep, known as nuclear transfer, the researchers were able to transplant DNA from the tissue into eggs taken from domestic goats to create 439 embryos, of which 57 were implanted into surrogate females.
Just seven of the embryos resulted in pregnancies and only one of the goats finally gave birth to a female bucardo, which died seven minutes later due to breathing difficulties, perhaps due to flaws in the DNA used to create the clone.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577262</id>
	<title>This story was brought back by cloning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262004660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09\%2F02\%2F01\%2F1657215" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Extinct Pyrenean Ibex Cloned</a> [slashdot.org] - February 1, 2009.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Extinct Pyrenean Ibex Cloned [ slashdot.org ] - February 1 , 2009 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Extinct Pyrenean Ibex Cloned [slashdot.org] - February 1, 2009.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576182</id>
	<title>Re:Don't worry!</title>
	<author>LifesABeach</author>
	<datestamp>1261997280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe we can have a "Coupon Day?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe we can have a " Coupon Day ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe we can have a "Coupon Day?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576364</id>
	<title>Y2K Bug</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261998360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They became extinct in 2000 because their coding only allowed for 2 digits for the year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They became extinct in 2000 because their coding only allowed for 2 digits for the year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They became extinct in 2000 because their coding only allowed for 2 digits for the year.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30581020</id>
	<title>Re:Old story is old.</title>
	<author>suso</author>
	<datestamp>1262092920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, it says right in the beginning was send via the telegraph. So obviously it took some time for the 150 baud connection to load the website.  I for one think its awesome that Slashdot is searching on all mediums in order to discover news for us nerds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , it says right in the beginning was send via the telegraph .
So obviously it took some time for the 150 baud connection to load the website .
I for one think its awesome that Slashdot is searching on all mediums in order to discover news for us nerds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, it says right in the beginning was send via the telegraph.
So obviously it took some time for the 150 baud connection to load the website.
I for one think its awesome that Slashdot is searching on all mediums in order to discover news for us nerds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575736</id>
	<title>Como?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261995240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What exactly does this story have to do with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBEX\_35" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Spanish stock indices?</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What exactly does this story have to do with Spanish stock indices ?
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What exactly does this story have to do with Spanish stock indices?
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577028</id>
	<title>So, this means...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262002980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jurassic Park should have been a lot shorter?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jurassic Park should have been a lot shorter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jurassic Park should have been a lot shorter?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30580124</id>
	<title>Re:Jurassic Park here we come!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262078940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course, but they are only far removed cousins of the cool dinosaurs.</p><p>When the ancestors of cool dinosaurs diverged from the ancestors of birds they were all small lizards and had teeth(many genera seemed to have a tendency to lose them and evolve beaks though). Some maniraptoran birds became large enough and kept enough teeth to be cool, but none of them survived.</p><p>BTW, even ratites have very advanced flight adaptations and aberrant skeletons for a dinosaur(even when comparing with maniraptora), any similarity is superficial. You could as well compare a kiwi with an echidna as they are both tetrapoda.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , but they are only far removed cousins of the cool dinosaurs.When the ancestors of cool dinosaurs diverged from the ancestors of birds they were all small lizards and had teeth ( many genera seemed to have a tendency to lose them and evolve beaks though ) .
Some maniraptoran birds became large enough and kept enough teeth to be cool , but none of them survived.BTW , even ratites have very advanced flight adaptations and aberrant skeletons for a dinosaur ( even when comparing with maniraptora ) , any similarity is superficial .
You could as well compare a kiwi with an echidna as they are both tetrapoda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, but they are only far removed cousins of the cool dinosaurs.When the ancestors of cool dinosaurs diverged from the ancestors of birds they were all small lizards and had teeth(many genera seemed to have a tendency to lose them and evolve beaks though).
Some maniraptoran birds became large enough and kept enough teeth to be cool, but none of them survived.BTW, even ratites have very advanced flight adaptations and aberrant skeletons for a dinosaur(even when comparing with maniraptora), any similarity is superficial.
You could as well compare a kiwi with an echidna as they are both tetrapoda.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578880</id>
	<title>Dupe?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262018640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hm, wtf? <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/02/01/1657215/Extinct-Pyrenean-Ibex-Cloned" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/02/01/1657215/Extinct-Pyrenean-Ibex-Cloned</a> [slashdot.org] , did a small search on "Ibex". This is not news, this is oooooold and already posted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hm , wtf ?
http : //science.slashdot.org/story/09/02/01/1657215/Extinct-Pyrenean-Ibex-Cloned [ slashdot.org ] , did a small search on " Ibex " .
This is not news , this is oooooold and already posted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hm, wtf?
http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/02/01/1657215/Extinct-Pyrenean-Ibex-Cloned [slashdot.org] , did a small search on "Ibex".
This is not news, this is oooooold and already posted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575692</id>
	<title>It's ALIVE!!!!!</title>
	<author>Yo Grark</author>
	<datestamp>1261995000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I won't goat you, I herd it's dead Jim.</p><p>Ewe!</p><p>Yo Grark</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wo n't goat you , I herd it 's dead Jim.Ewe ! Yo Grark</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I won't goat you, I herd it's dead Jim.Ewe!Yo Grark</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575638</id>
	<title>Don't worry!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261994760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nature will find a way.</p><p>Did we learn nothing from Jurassic Park?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nature will find a way.Did we learn nothing from Jurassic Park ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nature will find a way.Did we learn nothing from Jurassic Park?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575650</id>
	<title>Is it just me..</title>
	<author>VMaN</author>
	<datestamp>1261994820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...or does that quote sound like something Douglas Adams would write?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...or does that quote sound like something Douglas Adams would write ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...or does that quote sound like something Douglas Adams would write?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579210</id>
	<title>Re:Jurassic Park here we come!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262022180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm. Dinosaurs don't exist. Birds exist. They share a common ancestor with dinosaurs, as do we.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm .
Dinosaurs do n't exist .
Birds exist .
They share a common ancestor with dinosaurs , as do we .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm.
Dinosaurs don't exist.
Birds exist.
They share a common ancestor with dinosaurs, as do we.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577334</id>
	<title>Resurrected?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262005200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>First species to become extinct, twice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>First species to become extinct , twice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First species to become extinct, twice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575990</id>
	<title>too easy...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261996380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>second <a href="http://i.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01250/ibex\_1250749c.jpg" title="telegraph.co.uk" rel="nofollow">goat</a> [telegraph.co.uk]!</htmltext>
<tokenext>second goat [ telegraph.co.uk ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>second goat [telegraph.co.uk]!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672</id>
	<title>Not exactly.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261994940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The mitochondrial DNA will not be from the IBX so what you have is still an hybrid.<br>Maybe better than nothing but not really bringing the species back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The mitochondrial DNA will not be from the IBX so what you have is still an hybrid.Maybe better than nothing but not really bringing the species back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The mitochondrial DNA will not be from the IBX so what you have is still an hybrid.Maybe better than nothing but not really bringing the species back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579050</id>
	<title>Re:No Problem...</title>
	<author>madnis</author>
	<datestamp>1262020560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We can just patch the damaged or missing segments with frog DNA...</p></div><p>ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOGOAT!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We can just patch the damaged or missing segments with frog DNA...ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOGOAT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We can just patch the damaged or missing segments with frog DNA...ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOGOAT!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579824</id>
	<title>Robb</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262117520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isnt this sort like kinda how windows was created?  Like being a clone then fighting the odds and then being born only to breathe all weird.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Isnt this sort like kinda how windows was created ?
Like being a clone then fighting the odds and then being born only to breathe all weird .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isnt this sort like kinda how windows was created?
Like being a clone then fighting the odds and then being born only to breathe all weird.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30580410</id>
	<title>Re:Corrected title...</title>
	<author>MiniMike</author>
	<datestamp>1262084520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Pyrenaen Ibix is still extinct!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Pyrenaen Ibix is still extinct !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Pyrenaen Ibix is still extinct!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576608</id>
	<title>Is it an intrepid ibex?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262000100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It may well be <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IntrepidIbex" title="ubuntu.com" rel="nofollow">slashdot's favourite animal</a> [ubuntu.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>It may well be slashdot 's favourite animal [ ubuntu.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may well be slashdot's favourite animal [ubuntu.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576074</id>
	<title>Re:Anyone else read this as</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261996800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ugh.  Now I have a picture of a fat man laying down underneath a goat giving birth to a burrito so it will fall directly into his mouth.  Thanks for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ugh .
Now I have a picture of a fat man laying down underneath a goat giving birth to a burrito so it will fall directly into his mouth .
Thanks for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ugh.
Now I have a picture of a fat man laying down underneath a goat giving birth to a burrito so it will fall directly into his mouth.
Thanks for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575770</id>
	<title>Nice try</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261995420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But I would suggest that next time a species is down to 30 members, get samples from ALL of them.  For all they know, this last one may have had some genetic defect, and pulling DNA from her eye probably didn't help her.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But I would suggest that next time a species is down to 30 members , get samples from ALL of them .
For all they know , this last one may have had some genetic defect , and pulling DNA from her eye probably did n't help her .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I would suggest that next time a species is down to 30 members, get samples from ALL of them.
For all they know, this last one may have had some genetic defect, and pulling DNA from her eye probably didn't help her.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576040</id>
	<title>We need to clone Ted Williams next.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261996620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Sox need a power hitter. I'd imagine that fans would underwrite the entire expense of the cloning operation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Sox need a power hitter .
I 'd imagine that fans would underwrite the entire expense of the cloning operation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Sox need a power hitter.
I'd imagine that fans would underwrite the entire expense of the cloning operation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30589156</id>
	<title>And it's tasty too!</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1262093760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm just saying....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm just saying... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm just saying....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575846</id>
	<title>Re:Old story is old.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261995720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The original story was declared extinct.  This story is the clone and, hopefully, will die a quick death.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The original story was declared extinct .
This story is the clone and , hopefully , will die a quick death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The original story was declared extinct.
This story is the clone and, hopefully, will die a quick death.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575636</id>
	<title>Call Dr Neil</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261994760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jurassic Park!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jurassic Park !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jurassic Park!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576634</id>
	<title>Re:Jurassic Park here we come!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262000220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dinosaurs still exist.  We call them "birds".</p><p>In particular, they're the decendents of the clade Maniraptora, which includes <i>velociraptor</i>.  Many are still remarkably similar to their ancestors -- for example, compare these <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Oviraptorinaeprofiles.jpg" title="wikimedia.org">reconstructed skull images of oviraptors</a> [wikimedia.org] with modern birds (for example, the <a href="http://images.google.com/images?gbv=2&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=lTI5S72\_HYfQNOzsveUI&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=spell\_reissue&amp;resnum=0&amp;ct=result&amp;cd=1&amp;q=cassowary&amp;spell=1&amp;start=0" title="google.com">cassowary</a> [google.com])</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dinosaurs still exist .
We call them " birds " .In particular , they 're the decendents of the clade Maniraptora , which includes velociraptor .
Many are still remarkably similar to their ancestors -- for example , compare these reconstructed skull images of oviraptors [ wikimedia.org ] with modern birds ( for example , the cassowary [ google.com ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dinosaurs still exist.
We call them "birds".In particular, they're the decendents of the clade Maniraptora, which includes velociraptor.
Many are still remarkably similar to their ancestors -- for example, compare these reconstructed skull images of oviraptors [wikimedia.org] with modern birds (for example, the cassowary [google.com])</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576006</id>
	<title>Oblig.</title>
	<author>bcong</author>
	<datestamp>1261996500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>John Hammond: "All major theme parks have had delays. When they opened Disneyland in 1956, nothing worked!"
<br> <br>
Dr. Ian Malcolm: "But, John. If the Pirates of the Caribbean breaks down, the pirates don't eat the tourists."</htmltext>
<tokenext>John Hammond : " All major theme parks have had delays .
When they opened Disneyland in 1956 , nothing worked !
" Dr. Ian Malcolm : " But , John .
If the Pirates of the Caribbean breaks down , the pirates do n't eat the tourists .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>John Hammond: "All major theme parks have had delays.
When they opened Disneyland in 1956, nothing worked!
"
 
Dr. Ian Malcolm: "But, John.
If the Pirates of the Caribbean breaks down, the pirates don't eat the tourists.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575694</id>
	<title>Corrected title...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261995060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pyrenean Ibex extinct... again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pyrenean Ibex extinct... again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pyrenean Ibex extinct... again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579442</id>
	<title>Re:No Problem...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262024880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>God creates ibex. God kills ibex. God creates man. Man kills God. Man creates ibex.</p><p>Ibex eats man, woman inherits the Earth?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>God creates ibex .
God kills ibex .
God creates man .
Man kills God .
Man creates ibex.Ibex eats man , woman inherits the Earth ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>God creates ibex.
God kills ibex.
God creates man.
Man kills God.
Man creates ibex.Ibex eats man, woman inherits the Earth?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575826</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261995600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The first generation IS a hybrid, but then you implant that with extracted DNA, and so forth so that after several generations you get something that is pretty much equivalent to the extinct species. Problem is, the process can take a hundred years. I'm still waiting for them to do this with the wooly mammoth; logic dictates that if my ancestors hunted this species to extinction, they must have been REALLY tasty!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The first generation IS a hybrid , but then you implant that with extracted DNA , and so forth so that after several generations you get something that is pretty much equivalent to the extinct species .
Problem is , the process can take a hundred years .
I 'm still waiting for them to do this with the wooly mammoth ; logic dictates that if my ancestors hunted this species to extinction , they must have been REALLY tasty !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first generation IS a hybrid, but then you implant that with extracted DNA, and so forth so that after several generations you get something that is pretty much equivalent to the extinct species.
Problem is, the process can take a hundred years.
I'm still waiting for them to do this with the wooly mammoth; logic dictates that if my ancestors hunted this species to extinction, they must have been REALLY tasty!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578990</id>
	<title>Re:iBex... iDoDo... iSlate!</title>
	<author>GrumblyStuff</author>
	<datestamp>1262019960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Don't you see?</p></div></blockquote><p>I don't.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you see ? I do n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you see?I don't.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576804</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>ianare</author>
	<datestamp>1262001240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess it could be a hybrid in a very strict sense, but generally 'hybrid' means mixing of nuclear DNA. The mtDNA doesn't really control anything, even the mitochondria themselves are mainly controlled by the nucleus. It's a very handy way of determining maternal ancestry, but makes no real difference in behavior or appearance, at least when considering two very closely related species as is this case.</p><p>If these trials are successful, genetic researches in the future would see an abrupt change in the mtDNA (and be able to trace the 'new' ibex lineage back to a specific domesticated goat), but I don't see that as a problem for the wild status of the animals, nor any change in their behavior.</p><p>I would be far more concerned with the break in parenting continuity. With no adults, how will the kids learn how to avoid predators, where the best grazing is, how to live in a herd, and perhaps most importantly - how to secure a mate ? Almost all mammals learn a great deal about the world from their parents and pass that on to the next generation. No amount of genetic manipulation can bring that back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess it could be a hybrid in a very strict sense , but generally 'hybrid ' means mixing of nuclear DNA .
The mtDNA does n't really control anything , even the mitochondria themselves are mainly controlled by the nucleus .
It 's a very handy way of determining maternal ancestry , but makes no real difference in behavior or appearance , at least when considering two very closely related species as is this case.If these trials are successful , genetic researches in the future would see an abrupt change in the mtDNA ( and be able to trace the 'new ' ibex lineage back to a specific domesticated goat ) , but I do n't see that as a problem for the wild status of the animals , nor any change in their behavior.I would be far more concerned with the break in parenting continuity .
With no adults , how will the kids learn how to avoid predators , where the best grazing is , how to live in a herd , and perhaps most importantly - how to secure a mate ?
Almost all mammals learn a great deal about the world from their parents and pass that on to the next generation .
No amount of genetic manipulation can bring that back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess it could be a hybrid in a very strict sense, but generally 'hybrid' means mixing of nuclear DNA.
The mtDNA doesn't really control anything, even the mitochondria themselves are mainly controlled by the nucleus.
It's a very handy way of determining maternal ancestry, but makes no real difference in behavior or appearance, at least when considering two very closely related species as is this case.If these trials are successful, genetic researches in the future would see an abrupt change in the mtDNA (and be able to trace the 'new' ibex lineage back to a specific domesticated goat), but I don't see that as a problem for the wild status of the animals, nor any change in their behavior.I would be far more concerned with the break in parenting continuity.
With no adults, how will the kids learn how to avoid predators, where the best grazing is, how to live in a herd, and perhaps most importantly - how to secure a mate ?
Almost all mammals learn a great deal about the world from their parents and pass that on to the next generation.
No amount of genetic manipulation can bring that back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576310</id>
	<title>Re:A new first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261998120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hhaha</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hhaha</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hhaha</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575766</id>
	<title>Old story is old.</title>
	<author>dougmwne</author>
	<datestamp>1261995420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is this story from 11 months ago being reported by Slashdot as if it just happened? Could the reason be anything other than sloppy content gate keeping?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this story from 11 months ago being reported by Slashdot as if it just happened ?
Could the reason be anything other than sloppy content gate keeping ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this story from 11 months ago being reported by Slashdot as if it just happened?
Could the reason be anything other than sloppy content gate keeping?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575684</id>
	<title>Jurassic Park here we come!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261995000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All I want to know is will we ever be able to clone a dinosaur? A goat giving birth to a different kind of goat is ok I guess but what if there is no close relative to the extinct species you want to clone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All I want to know is will we ever be able to clone a dinosaur ?
A goat giving birth to a different kind of goat is ok I guess but what if there is no close relative to the extinct species you want to clone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I want to know is will we ever be able to clone a dinosaur?
A goat giving birth to a different kind of goat is ok I guess but what if there is no close relative to the extinct species you want to clone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577622</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>d\_54321</author>
	<datestamp>1262007840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder what ibex tastes like</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what ibex tastes like</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder what ibex tastes like</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578944</id>
	<title>Re:Not necessarily</title>
	<author>Rocketship Underpant</author>
	<datestamp>1262019420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So statistically, if they keep working at it and try a few hundred more times, they should get lucky with a few ibex kids that survive infancy. Though I suppose it would be better if they had DNA from a few different specimens in order to establish a breeding colony with some genetic variety.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So statistically , if they keep working at it and try a few hundred more times , they should get lucky with a few ibex kids that survive infancy .
Though I suppose it would be better if they had DNA from a few different specimens in order to establish a breeding colony with some genetic variety .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So statistically, if they keep working at it and try a few hundred more times, they should get lucky with a few ibex kids that survive infancy.
Though I suppose it would be better if they had DNA from a few different specimens in order to establish a breeding colony with some genetic variety.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577370</id>
	<title>Old Article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262005440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone take notice this article was published almost a year ago?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone take notice this article was published almost a year ago ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone take notice this article was published almost a year ago?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576394</id>
	<title>The question on everybody's mind...</title>
	<author>JohnnyBGod</author>
	<datestamp>1261998540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was it Intrepid?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was it Intrepid ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was it Intrepid?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576072</id>
	<title>Re:It's ALIVE!!!!!</title>
	<author>JustOK</author>
	<datestamp>1261996800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just needs more RAM.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just needs more RAM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just needs more RAM.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575658</id>
	<title>Did you see that Moive?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261994880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't anyone see Jurassic Park?  I for one welcome our new T-Rex overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't anyone see Jurassic Park ?
I for one welcome our new T-Rex overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't anyone see Jurassic Park?
I for one welcome our new T-Rex overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576656</id>
	<title>Re:Old story is old.</title>
	<author>indeciso</author>
	<datestamp>1262000460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Aye, actually when I read the heading I felt some kind of a d&#233;j&#224; vu... <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/01/1657215&amp;from=rss" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">no wonder.</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Aye , actually when I read the heading I felt some kind of a d   j   vu... no wonder .
[ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aye, actually when I read the heading I felt some kind of a déjà vu... no wonder.
[slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576632</id>
	<title>Re:Nice try</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262000220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're making this too complicated... if there are 30 members left, quickly do it the old fashioned way! Fuck "like animals"!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're making this too complicated... if there are 30 members left , quickly do it the old fashioned way !
Fuck " like animals " !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're making this too complicated... if there are 30 members left, quickly do it the old fashioned way!
Fuck "like animals"!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577430</id>
	<title>For seconds, I nominate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262006220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who's next, Salvador Dali ? No, wait. That would be Andy Warhol first, surely. Then, maybe, 5 to 15 Dali's - set in a country town in Spain. Or, if you're feeling jolly - in Switzerland - WTH.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who 's next , Salvador Dali ?
No , wait .
That would be Andy Warhol first , surely .
Then , maybe , 5 to 15 Dali 's - set in a country town in Spain .
Or , if you 're feeling jolly - in Switzerland - WTH .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who's next, Salvador Dali ?
No, wait.
That would be Andy Warhol first, surely.
Then, maybe, 5 to 15 Dali's - set in a country town in Spain.
Or, if you're feeling jolly - in Switzerland - WTH.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576004</id>
	<title>first a sheep, next Jesus</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261996500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Using bloodstains from the shroud of Turin, Jesus will be cloned. All herald the second coming. Hallelujah, the missiles are flying!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Using bloodstains from the shroud of Turin , Jesus will be cloned .
All herald the second coming .
Hallelujah , the missiles are flying !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using bloodstains from the shroud of Turin, Jesus will be cloned.
All herald the second coming.
Hallelujah, the missiles are flying!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579252</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1262022600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Getting a lot of meat from one kill does you very little good when you have no refrigeration. I was of course joking, almost all the large land mammals in North America went extinct about 10,000 years ago, which just happened to coincide with a new wave of immigration from Siberia. For herd animals, it is theorized that hunting techniques like driving the whole herd towards a cliff may have contributed to extinction, but for sabre tooths, cave bears, and giant sloths that almost certainly wouldn't have worked, so environment is a much more likely explanation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Getting a lot of meat from one kill does you very little good when you have no refrigeration .
I was of course joking , almost all the large land mammals in North America went extinct about 10,000 years ago , which just happened to coincide with a new wave of immigration from Siberia .
For herd animals , it is theorized that hunting techniques like driving the whole herd towards a cliff may have contributed to extinction , but for sabre tooths , cave bears , and giant sloths that almost certainly would n't have worked , so environment is a much more likely explanation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Getting a lot of meat from one kill does you very little good when you have no refrigeration.
I was of course joking, almost all the large land mammals in North America went extinct about 10,000 years ago, which just happened to coincide with a new wave of immigration from Siberia.
For herd animals, it is theorized that hunting techniques like driving the whole herd towards a cliff may have contributed to extinction, but for sabre tooths, cave bears, and giant sloths that almost certainly wouldn't have worked, so environment is a much more likely explanation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575824</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>RileyBryan</author>
	<datestamp>1261995600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've been waiting for YEARS for the chance to eat extinct animals! T-Rex Burgers, Bald Eagle Sandwiches, Dodo Egg Omelettes, Saber-toothed McNuggets! Yummmm!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been waiting for YEARS for the chance to eat extinct animals !
T-Rex Burgers , Bald Eagle Sandwiches , Dodo Egg Omelettes , Saber-toothed McNuggets !
Yummmm !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been waiting for YEARS for the chance to eat extinct animals!
T-Rex Burgers, Bald Eagle Sandwiches, Dodo Egg Omelettes, Saber-toothed McNuggets!
Yummmm!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577906</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>owlstead</author>
	<datestamp>1262009940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>At this point we should probably be harvesting DNA from threatened species (from enough donors to form a not-completely-terrible breeding population) and storing it away somewhere.</p></div><p>I don't see the point. The main reasons that we don't have these animals any more is because we've destroyed their habitat. As long as we are not restoring or replacing those habitats, what use is it to resurrect the animals that used to live in it? I mean, do we want to have a zoo that keeps all the extinct animals? For what reason?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>At this point we should probably be harvesting DNA from threatened species ( from enough donors to form a not-completely-terrible breeding population ) and storing it away somewhere.I do n't see the point .
The main reasons that we do n't have these animals any more is because we 've destroyed their habitat .
As long as we are not restoring or replacing those habitats , what use is it to resurrect the animals that used to live in it ?
I mean , do we want to have a zoo that keeps all the extinct animals ?
For what reason ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At this point we should probably be harvesting DNA from threatened species (from enough donors to form a not-completely-terrible breeding population) and storing it away somewhere.I don't see the point.
The main reasons that we don't have these animals any more is because we've destroyed their habitat.
As long as we are not restoring or replacing those habitats, what use is it to resurrect the animals that used to live in it?
I mean, do we want to have a zoo that keeps all the extinct animals?
For what reason?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30585600</id>
	<title>Re:Intrepid Ibex</title>
	<author>egcagrac0</author>
	<datestamp>1262120040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, but 8.10 isn't that old; "extinct" is hardly the right term.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but 8.10 is n't that old ; " extinct " is hardly the right term .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but 8.10 isn't that old; "extinct" is hardly the right term.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576080</id>
	<title>Re:Old story is old.</title>
	<author>Conchobair</author>
	<datestamp>1261996800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll bet the good people at The Telegraph are wondering how a story published on 31 Jan 2009 made it back into the most viewed list.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll bet the good people at The Telegraph are wondering how a story published on 31 Jan 2009 made it back into the most viewed list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll bet the good people at The Telegraph are wondering how a story published on 31 Jan 2009 made it back into the most viewed list.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575876</id>
	<title>Re:Nice try</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1261995840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hindsight is 20/20 they say.</p><p>We haven't really been cloning all that long and as such, planning out how to best disassemble species as they become extinct isn't standard practice yet.  They're still writing the RFCs, they haven't even been commented on yet, its gonna take a few tries to get it figured out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hindsight is 20/20 they say.We have n't really been cloning all that long and as such , planning out how to best disassemble species as they become extinct is n't standard practice yet .
They 're still writing the RFCs , they have n't even been commented on yet , its gon na take a few tries to get it figured out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hindsight is 20/20 they say.We haven't really been cloning all that long and as such, planning out how to best disassemble species as they become extinct isn't standard practice yet.
They're still writing the RFCs, they haven't even been commented on yet, its gonna take a few tries to get it figured out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576248</id>
	<title>Human cloning and estate taxes</title>
	<author>caffeinefiend</author>
	<datestamp>1261997640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cloning is becoming more and more advanced. Human cloning will probably be achievable within the next 20 years. How long until Republicans back human cloning as a way to avoid estate taxes???</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cloning is becoming more and more advanced .
Human cloning will probably be achievable within the next 20 years .
How long until Republicans back human cloning as a way to avoid estate taxes ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cloning is becoming more and more advanced.
Human cloning will probably be achievable within the next 20 years.
How long until Republicans back human cloning as a way to avoid estate taxes??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576628</id>
	<title>mammoth next</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1262000160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>please, please, pretty please</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>please , please , pretty please</tokentext>
<sentencetext>please, please, pretty please</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577246</id>
	<title>Re:Anyone else read this as</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1262004540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was confused how this might be a troll until I read one of the replies.  I suppose I'm not hip to the new slang.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was confused how this might be a troll until I read one of the replies .
I suppose I 'm not hip to the new slang .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was confused how this might be a troll until I read one of the replies.
I suppose I'm not hip to the new slang.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575852</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261995720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But if they have skin samples, then they do have the mitochondrial DNA. We just don't have the ability to replace that part of the cell structure. Yet. Another problem is that the specimen is female, meaning there is no Y chromosome, so we could never create a male.</p><p>At this point we should probably be harvesting DNA from threatened species (from enough donors to form a not-completely-terrible breeding population) and storing it away somewhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But if they have skin samples , then they do have the mitochondrial DNA .
We just do n't have the ability to replace that part of the cell structure .
Yet. Another problem is that the specimen is female , meaning there is no Y chromosome , so we could never create a male.At this point we should probably be harvesting DNA from threatened species ( from enough donors to form a not-completely-terrible breeding population ) and storing it away somewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if they have skin samples, then they do have the mitochondrial DNA.
We just don't have the ability to replace that part of the cell structure.
Yet. Another problem is that the specimen is female, meaning there is no Y chromosome, so we could never create a male.At this point we should probably be harvesting DNA from threatened species (from enough donors to form a not-completely-terrible breeding population) and storing it away somewhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576392</id>
	<title>Not necessarily</title>
	<author>HangingChad</author>
	<datestamp>1261998540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr><i>...which died a seven minutes later due to breathing difficulties, perhaps due to flaws in the DNA used to create the clone.</i>

</p><p>I have a goat herd and trust me when I say there doesn't have to be any flaws in the DNA to lose a baby. I've seen them still born, born too frail to stand up and get colostrum from mom, seen them live for a couple days and then die for no apparent reason.  There's a reason goats have babies two and sometimes three at a time.  The loss rate can be high, even under ideal conditions.  The breed difference could account for it.  Maybe the original breed had a slightly longer gestation period than modern goats.

</p><p>Back in the day I used to help a vet implant zebra embryos in horses.  The take rate was a bit higher than that experiment, but we had more embryos to work with.  10\% was a pretty good rate for implants and there's a lot of data on horses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...which died a seven minutes later due to breathing difficulties , perhaps due to flaws in the DNA used to create the clone .
I have a goat herd and trust me when I say there does n't have to be any flaws in the DNA to lose a baby .
I 've seen them still born , born too frail to stand up and get colostrum from mom , seen them live for a couple days and then die for no apparent reason .
There 's a reason goats have babies two and sometimes three at a time .
The loss rate can be high , even under ideal conditions .
The breed difference could account for it .
Maybe the original breed had a slightly longer gestation period than modern goats .
Back in the day I used to help a vet implant zebra embryos in horses .
The take rate was a bit higher than that experiment , but we had more embryos to work with .
10 \ % was a pretty good rate for implants and there 's a lot of data on horses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...which died a seven minutes later due to breathing difficulties, perhaps due to flaws in the DNA used to create the clone.
I have a goat herd and trust me when I say there doesn't have to be any flaws in the DNA to lose a baby.
I've seen them still born, born too frail to stand up and get colostrum from mom, seen them live for a couple days and then die for no apparent reason.
There's a reason goats have babies two and sometimes three at a time.
The loss rate can be high, even under ideal conditions.
The breed difference could account for it.
Maybe the original breed had a slightly longer gestation period than modern goats.
Back in the day I used to help a vet implant zebra embryos in horses.
The take rate was a bit higher than that experiment, but we had more embryos to work with.
10\% was a pretty good rate for implants and there's a lot of data on horses.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576640</id>
	<title>Frankenstein</title>
	<author>WinstonWolfIT</author>
	<datestamp>1262000340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's pronounced FRAHNkensteen!!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's pronounced FRAHNkensteen ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's pronounced FRAHNkensteen!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576228</id>
	<title>OMG Can it be so?</title>
	<author>ZERO1ZERO</author>
	<datestamp>1261997460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one, welcome our newly extinct Ibex Clone overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one , welcome our newly extinct Ibex Clone overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one, welcome our newly extinct Ibex Clone overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577596</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262007600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Naaah! They just tore up the flower beds and spice patches something nasty. And wandered through the village after frolicking in the trash dump. Or went for a trunkful of water, after waking up in the middle of the night. They brought it on themselves, really.</p><p>A Baluchitherium, now. That would be really neat!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Frankly, though, this sort of news is getting to be a bit, er, repetitive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Naaah !
They just tore up the flower beds and spice patches something nasty .
And wandered through the village after frolicking in the trash dump .
Or went for a trunkful of water , after waking up in the middle of the night .
They brought it on themselves , really.A Baluchitherium , now .
That would be really neat !
: ) Frankly , though , this sort of news is getting to be a bit , er , repetitive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Naaah!
They just tore up the flower beds and spice patches something nasty.
And wandered through the village after frolicking in the trash dump.
Or went for a trunkful of water, after waking up in the middle of the night.
They brought it on themselves, really.A Baluchitherium, now.
That would be really neat!
:)Frankly, though, this sort of news is getting to be a bit, er, repetitive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576586</id>
	<title>kind of cruel</title>
	<author>poached</author>
	<datestamp>1261999800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's like this episode of the simpsons, treehouse of horror XII where Bart casts a frog into a frog/man hybrid and it was a "sin against nature".
<br> <br>
I feel like the Ibex that was only alive for 7 minutes probably felt about the same.
<br> <br>
Can't we just leave the extinct alone? Some mistakes can't be corrected.
<br> <br>
<a href="http://en.sevenload.com/videos/qMVhCUs-Simpsons-Harry-Potter-spoof" title="sevenload.com" rel="nofollow">http://en.sevenload.com/videos/qMVhCUs-Simpsons-Harry-Potter-spoof</a> [sevenload.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like this episode of the simpsons , treehouse of horror XII where Bart casts a frog into a frog/man hybrid and it was a " sin against nature " .
I feel like the Ibex that was only alive for 7 minutes probably felt about the same .
Ca n't we just leave the extinct alone ?
Some mistakes ca n't be corrected .
http : //en.sevenload.com/videos/qMVhCUs-Simpsons-Harry-Potter-spoof [ sevenload.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like this episode of the simpsons, treehouse of horror XII where Bart casts a frog into a frog/man hybrid and it was a "sin against nature".
I feel like the Ibex that was only alive for 7 minutes probably felt about the same.
Can't we just leave the extinct alone?
Some mistakes can't be corrected.
http://en.sevenload.com/videos/qMVhCUs-Simpsons-Harry-Potter-spoof [sevenload.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578616</id>
	<title>Old news?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262015580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did no one else remember this story from a year ago?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did no one else remember this story from a year ago ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did no one else remember this story from a year ago?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575996</id>
	<title>Re:Finally!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261996440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bald eagle is not extinct.  in fact it's not even endangered.  You can eat them.  Hell they are almost a pest here in Michigan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bald eagle is not extinct .
in fact it 's not even endangered .
You can eat them .
Hell they are almost a pest here in Michigan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bald eagle is not extinct.
in fact it's not even endangered.
You can eat them.
Hell they are almost a pest here in Michigan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576630</id>
	<title>Re:No Problem...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262000160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you kidding? The submission is a clone!<br><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/01/1657215&amp;from=rss" title="slashdot.org">http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/01/1657215&amp;from=rss</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you kidding ?
The submission is a clone ! http : //science.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 09/02/01/1657215&amp;from = rss [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you kidding?
The submission is a clone!http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/01/1657215&amp;from=rss [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575646</id>
	<title>science!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261994820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>science!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>science !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>science!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577106</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>dkh2</author>
	<datestamp>1262003580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are many species without a Y chromosome.  Guppies (the aquarium fish) for example.  The diff between female and male guppies is X X vs. X null.</p><p>Humans are headed in this direction, slowly, because the human Y chromosome is non-recombinant and does not repair itself when errors or mutations occur.  Whether that means males are defective or just more efficient is still up for debate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are many species without a Y chromosome .
Guppies ( the aquarium fish ) for example .
The diff between female and male guppies is X X vs. X null.Humans are headed in this direction , slowly , because the human Y chromosome is non-recombinant and does not repair itself when errors or mutations occur .
Whether that means males are defective or just more efficient is still up for debate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are many species without a Y chromosome.
Guppies (the aquarium fish) for example.
The diff between female and male guppies is X X vs. X null.Humans are headed in this direction, slowly, because the human Y chromosome is non-recombinant and does not repair itself when errors or mutations occur.
Whether that means males are defective or just more efficient is still up for debate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30580820</id>
	<title>Are you sure it's not a penguin?</title>
	<author>LordHatrus</author>
	<datestamp>1262090520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is one Intrepid Ibex for sure. Maybe they spliced in some penguin DNA? *wink*</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is one Intrepid Ibex for sure .
Maybe they spliced in some penguin DNA ?
* wink *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is one Intrepid Ibex for sure.
Maybe they spliced in some penguin DNA?
*wink*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575716</id>
	<title>Intrepid Ibex</title>
	<author>Xamusk</author>
	<datestamp>1261995180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That a real Intrepid Ibex</htmltext>
<tokenext>That a real Intrepid Ibex</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That a real Intrepid Ibex</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576348</id>
	<title>Carnivorous jumping goats, that's just great!</title>
	<author>NotQuiteReal</author>
	<datestamp>1261998240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>heh, I mis-read it as Piranha Ibex at first. I figured it must be a plot by PETA to let the little buggers fight back.</htmltext>
<tokenext>heh , I mis-read it as Piranha Ibex at first .
I figured it must be a plot by PETA to let the little buggers fight back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>heh, I mis-read it as Piranha Ibex at first.
I figured it must be a plot by PETA to let the little buggers fight back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578994</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>jfern</author>
	<datestamp>1262020020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seeing as this is an extinct subspecies, it shouldn't be a big deal to just take that from another subspecies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seeing as this is an extinct subspecies , it should n't be a big deal to just take that from another subspecies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seeing as this is an extinct subspecies, it shouldn't be a big deal to just take that from another subspecies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575752</id>
	<title>So when...</title>
	<author>SirBigSpur</author>
	<datestamp>1261995300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>do I get me pet Mastadon?</htmltext>
<tokenext>do I get me pet Mastadon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>do I get me pet Mastadon?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576872</id>
	<title>Re:Corrected title...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262001720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... am I the only one, or did anybody else think this was an Ubuntu story about some dead Debian clone<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... am I the only one , or did anybody else think this was an Ubuntu story about some dead Debian clone .. ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... am I the only one, or did anybody else think this was an Ubuntu story about some dead Debian clone ..?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30584732</id>
	<title>Re:Jurassic Park here we come!</title>
	<author>Rei</author>
	<datestamp>1262115960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We do not share a common ancestor with dinosaurs.  We are the descendants of synapsid reptiles, which were largely beaten out in the triassic by archosaurs (the ancestors of all dinosaurs, birds, and crocodilians).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We do not share a common ancestor with dinosaurs .
We are the descendants of synapsid reptiles , which were largely beaten out in the triassic by archosaurs ( the ancestors of all dinosaurs , birds , and crocodilians ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We do not share a common ancestor with dinosaurs.
We are the descendants of synapsid reptiles, which were largely beaten out in the triassic by archosaurs (the ancestors of all dinosaurs, birds, and crocodilians).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576300</id>
	<title>Re:Finally!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261998000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I want to know is how the fuck is the Canadian Goose still on the endangered list. Seriously if those fuckers aren't at or beyond their pre-endangered levels now I'd hate to see what those levels are like when they are no longer endangered.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I want to know is how the fuck is the Canadian Goose still on the endangered list .
Seriously if those fuckers are n't at or beyond their pre-endangered levels now I 'd hate to see what those levels are like when they are no longer endangered .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I want to know is how the fuck is the Canadian Goose still on the endangered list.
Seriously if those fuckers aren't at or beyond their pre-endangered levels now I'd hate to see what those levels are like when they are no longer endangered.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577398</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>reverseengineer</author>
	<datestamp>1262005800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The ability to transfer mitochondria is definitely possible, and has been for over a decade- see <a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/u26u573211487138/" title="springerlink.com">here</a> [springerlink.com] for instance, where it was performed between two species of mice.  I doubt they bothered with the process though, for several reasons.  Mitochondrial transfer has an admittedly low success rate, and of course nuclear transfer has a low success rate, so that to produce a viable clone with both procedures would be extremely difficult.  The mtDNA also has a higher mutation rate than nuclear DNA due to the reactive oxygen species the mitochondrion cranks out.  It might be that there isn't much meaningful interspecies variation between the mtDNA of extinct ibex and the living egg donor, especially in relation to intraspecies variation.

<br> <br>
Also, the mitochondrial DNA in most mammals is about 17,000 base pairs.  The average mammalian nuclear genome is a few billion base pairs.  The nuclear DNA represents over 99.99\% of the total DNA, and given that I'd assume domestic goat mtDNA to have at the very least a 98\% concurrence with Pyrenean ibex mtDNA, you'd be looking at a variability consistent with the overall error rate of DNA.  The preservation, cloning, and IVF steps likely swamp interspecies mtDNA variation as an overall source of genetic error.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The ability to transfer mitochondria is definitely possible , and has been for over a decade- see here [ springerlink.com ] for instance , where it was performed between two species of mice .
I doubt they bothered with the process though , for several reasons .
Mitochondrial transfer has an admittedly low success rate , and of course nuclear transfer has a low success rate , so that to produce a viable clone with both procedures would be extremely difficult .
The mtDNA also has a higher mutation rate than nuclear DNA due to the reactive oxygen species the mitochondrion cranks out .
It might be that there is n't much meaningful interspecies variation between the mtDNA of extinct ibex and the living egg donor , especially in relation to intraspecies variation .
Also , the mitochondrial DNA in most mammals is about 17,000 base pairs .
The average mammalian nuclear genome is a few billion base pairs .
The nuclear DNA represents over 99.99 \ % of the total DNA , and given that I 'd assume domestic goat mtDNA to have at the very least a 98 \ % concurrence with Pyrenean ibex mtDNA , you 'd be looking at a variability consistent with the overall error rate of DNA .
The preservation , cloning , and IVF steps likely swamp interspecies mtDNA variation as an overall source of genetic error .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ability to transfer mitochondria is definitely possible, and has been for over a decade- see here [springerlink.com] for instance, where it was performed between two species of mice.
I doubt they bothered with the process though, for several reasons.
Mitochondrial transfer has an admittedly low success rate, and of course nuclear transfer has a low success rate, so that to produce a viable clone with both procedures would be extremely difficult.
The mtDNA also has a higher mutation rate than nuclear DNA due to the reactive oxygen species the mitochondrion cranks out.
It might be that there isn't much meaningful interspecies variation between the mtDNA of extinct ibex and the living egg donor, especially in relation to intraspecies variation.
Also, the mitochondrial DNA in most mammals is about 17,000 base pairs.
The average mammalian nuclear genome is a few billion base pairs.
The nuclear DNA represents over 99.99\% of the total DNA, and given that I'd assume domestic goat mtDNA to have at the very least a 98\% concurrence with Pyrenean ibex mtDNA, you'd be looking at a variability consistent with the overall error rate of DNA.
The preservation, cloning, and IVF steps likely swamp interspecies mtDNA variation as an overall source of genetic error.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579484</id>
	<title>Apparently not</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262025420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Heck, here on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., we keep repeating the same dead jokes. And they keep propagating even with ppl screaming for ppl to quit redoing the same item. Not different than in JP.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Heck , here on /. , we keep repeating the same dead jokes .
And they keep propagating even with ppl screaming for ppl to quit redoing the same item .
Not different than in JP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heck, here on /., we keep repeating the same dead jokes.
And they keep propagating even with ppl screaming for ppl to quit redoing the same item.
Not different than in JP.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577502</id>
	<title>Re:Don't worry!</title>
	<author>DrCode</author>
	<datestamp>1262006940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes:  Don't rely solely on an electric fence to keep dangerous animals confined.:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes : Do n't rely solely on an electric fence to keep dangerous animals confined .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes:  Don't rely solely on an electric fence to keep dangerous animals confined.
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576212</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>Aeros</author>
	<datestamp>1261997400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>better trademark the name 'Mammoth Burgers' and 'Mammoth Steaks' now then so your grandkids or great-grandkids will be wealthy!</htmltext>
<tokenext>better trademark the name 'Mammoth Burgers ' and 'Mammoth Steaks ' now then so your grandkids or great-grandkids will be wealthy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>better trademark the name 'Mammoth Burgers' and 'Mammoth Steaks' now then so your grandkids or great-grandkids will be wealthy!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30581784</id>
	<title>Re:Don't worry!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262100780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nature will find a way, apparently, to do everything except avert the extinction in the first place...</p><p>I think that should tell us something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nature will find a way , apparently , to do everything except avert the extinction in the first place...I think that should tell us something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nature will find a way, apparently, to do everything except avert the extinction in the first place...I think that should tell us something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576352</id>
	<title>This is old news...</title>
	<author>cyberjock1980</author>
	<datestamp>1261998300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article linked is dated January 31, 2009.  At least the article is dated this year...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article linked is dated January 31 , 2009 .
At least the article is dated this year.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article linked is dated January 31, 2009.
At least the article is dated this year...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576790</id>
	<title>Damn radiation.</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1262001180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nuclear transfers, no wonder the poor thing died soon after.<br><br>Seriously, though, even if they perfect the technique and the beasties survive, and apart from the mitochondrial issue that's been posted already, you'd still have to manage to clone a sufficiently diverse population for it to become self-sustaining again. I doubt there's many extinct species for which we've got several dozen different DNA samples in good condition.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nuclear transfers , no wonder the poor thing died soon after.Seriously , though , even if they perfect the technique and the beasties survive , and apart from the mitochondrial issue that 's been posted already , you 'd still have to manage to clone a sufficiently diverse population for it to become self-sustaining again .
I doubt there 's many extinct species for which we 've got several dozen different DNA samples in good condition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nuclear transfers, no wonder the poor thing died soon after.Seriously, though, even if they perfect the technique and the beasties survive, and apart from the mitochondrial issue that's been posted already, you'd still have to manage to clone a sufficiently diverse population for it to become self-sustaining again.
I doubt there's many extinct species for which we've got several dozen different DNA samples in good condition.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576014</id>
	<title>Yo dawg</title>
	<author>dandart</author>
	<datestamp>1261996500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>yo dawg/goat/fish,

i herd u liek cloning

so i put a goatfishcat in ur manbearpig

but i eated it</htmltext>
<tokenext>yo dawg/goat/fish , i herd u liek cloning so i put a goatfishcat in ur manbearpig but i eated it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yo dawg/goat/fish,

i herd u liek cloning

so i put a goatfishcat in ur manbearpig

but i eated it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30580806</id>
	<title>Ubuntu?</title>
	<author>littlem</author>
	<datestamp>1262090220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't Extinct Ibex the next Ubuntu release?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't Extinct Ibex the next Ubuntu release ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't Extinct Ibex the next Ubuntu release?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30580224</id>
	<title>Re:Anyone else read this as</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262080800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The fridge is that way dear sir. Subliminal messages are a beautiful thing!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The fridge is that way dear sir .
Subliminal messages are a beautiful thing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fridge is that way dear sir.
Subliminal messages are a beautiful thing!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576536</id>
	<title>Begun</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261999380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the goat wars have.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the goat wars have .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the goat wars have.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575924</id>
	<title>Re:Finally!</title>
	<author>NotBornYesterday</author>
	<datestamp>1261996080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You might want to re-check the status of the Bald Eagles.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You might want to re-check the status of the Bald Eagles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might want to re-check the status of the Bald Eagles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575960</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261996260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure that this is something that can be easily fixed by inoculating the cells with a healthy dose of metaclurians.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure that this is something that can be easily fixed by inoculating the cells with a healthy dose of metaclurians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure that this is something that can be easily fixed by inoculating the cells with a healthy dose of metaclurians.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576388</id>
	<title>iBex... iDoDo... iSlate!</title>
	<author>VoxMagis</author>
	<datestamp>1261998540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't you see?  It's a marketing ploy by Apple!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you see ?
It 's a marketing ploy by Apple !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you see?
It's a marketing ploy by Apple!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575760</id>
	<title>What a coincidence!</title>
	<author>greatica</author>
	<datestamp>1261995360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"While the goat didn't survive long due to lung defects this gives scientists hopes that it will be possible to resurrect extinct species from frozen tissue."</p><p>That was about how my 8.10 experience went too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" While the goat did n't survive long due to lung defects this gives scientists hopes that it will be possible to resurrect extinct species from frozen tissue .
" That was about how my 8.10 experience went too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"While the goat didn't survive long due to lung defects this gives scientists hopes that it will be possible to resurrect extinct species from frozen tissue.
"That was about how my 8.10 experience went too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577902</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>Macrat</author>
	<datestamp>1262009940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> I'm still waiting for them to do this with the wooly mammoth; logic dictates that if my ancestors hunted this species to extinction, they must have been REALLY tasty!</p></div><p>Mmmmm. McMammoth sandwiches!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm still waiting for them to do this with the wooly mammoth ; logic dictates that if my ancestors hunted this species to extinction , they must have been REALLY tasty ! Mmmmm .
McMammoth sandwiches !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I'm still waiting for them to do this with the wooly mammoth; logic dictates that if my ancestors hunted this species to extinction, they must have been REALLY tasty!Mmmmm.
McMammoth sandwiches!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575738</id>
	<title>A new first</title>
	<author>Haxzaw</author>
	<datestamp>1261995240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, this Ibex became the first species to become extinct twice?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , this Ibex became the first species to become extinct twice ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, this Ibex became the first species to become extinct twice?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30581352</id>
	<title>Re:Jurassic Park here we come!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262097060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Dinosaurs still exist.  We call them "birds".</p><p>In particular, they're the decendents of the clade Maniraptora, which includes <i>velociraptor</i>.  Many are still remarkably similar to their ancestors -- for example, compare these <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Oviraptorinaeprofiles.jpg" title="wikimedia.org" rel="nofollow">reconstructed skull images of oviraptors</a> [wikimedia.org] with modern birds (for example, the <a href="http://images.google.com/images?gbv=2&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=lTI5S72\_HYfQNOzsveUI&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=spell\_reissue&amp;resnum=0&amp;ct=result&amp;cd=1&amp;q=cassowary&amp;spell=1&amp;start=0" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">cassowary</a> [google.com])</p></div><p>Obligatory xkcd:</p><p>http://xkcd.com/155/</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dinosaurs still exist .
We call them " birds " .In particular , they 're the decendents of the clade Maniraptora , which includes velociraptor .
Many are still remarkably similar to their ancestors -- for example , compare these reconstructed skull images of oviraptors [ wikimedia.org ] with modern birds ( for example , the cassowary [ google.com ] ) Obligatory xkcd : http : //xkcd.com/155/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dinosaurs still exist.
We call them "birds".In particular, they're the decendents of the clade Maniraptora, which includes velociraptor.
Many are still remarkably similar to their ancestors -- for example, compare these reconstructed skull images of oviraptors [wikimedia.org] with modern birds (for example, the cassowary [google.com])Obligatory xkcd:http://xkcd.com/155/
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30580576</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>dunkelfalke</author>
	<datestamp>1262087160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There were lots of deep-frozen mammoths in north-eastern parts of Russia which were eaten by locals even only some decades ago. AFAIR they said the mammoths were very tasty.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There were lots of deep-frozen mammoths in north-eastern parts of Russia which were eaten by locals even only some decades ago .
AFAIR they said the mammoths were very tasty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There were lots of deep-frozen mammoths in north-eastern parts of Russia which were eaten by locals even only some decades ago.
AFAIR they said the mammoths were very tasty.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578542</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1262014800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually current thinking is that they just went extinct for a number of natural causes like the ice age and predators.<br>Very large animals in general are historically at high risk for extinction</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually current thinking is that they just went extinct for a number of natural causes like the ice age and predators.Very large animals in general are historically at high risk for extinction</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually current thinking is that they just went extinct for a number of natural causes like the ice age and predators.Very large animals in general are historically at high risk for extinction</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576444</id>
	<title>Re:Old story is old.</title>
	<author>AnotherUsername</author>
	<datestamp>1261998780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is still interesting.  I'm not sure if this is a duplicate, but if it is not, I don't see the problem with it being here.  I had not heard anything about this until I saw the story in the rss feed, so for me, although it is old, it is still new to me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is still interesting .
I 'm not sure if this is a duplicate , but if it is not , I do n't see the problem with it being here .
I had not heard anything about this until I saw the story in the rss feed , so for me , although it is old , it is still new to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is still interesting.
I'm not sure if this is a duplicate, but if it is not, I don't see the problem with it being here.
I had not heard anything about this until I saw the story in the rss feed, so for me, although it is old, it is still new to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576020</id>
	<title>Patching DNA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261996560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do DNA patches come out on Tuesdays????</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do DNA patches come out on Tuesdays ? ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do DNA patches come out on Tuesdays???
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579042</id>
	<title>Incompatible Gestation Periods</title>
	<author>red\_flea</author>
	<datestamp>1262020500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Goat gestation period are around 150 days.
<br>Ibex is around 165 days.
<br>
<br>Even if you take a healthy Ibex mother and remove the fetus after 150 days, it will have similar lung disability. Lungs being the last thing to develop in a fetus, if you chop off the last few days of fetal development, you're sacrificing lung function. They won't work at 100\%, and they'll be way more sensitive to any agitation. It seems to me like a better approach would be to find an animal with a equal OR LONGER gestational period. I don't mean for Ibexes in particular; it just makes sense for any mammal. Try a mountain goat: 180 day average gestation period. Just make sure you bust the little guy out two weeks early.
<br>
<br>If humans go extinct and you implant human DNA into a bonobo, you're putting something that takes 280 days to cook into an oven with a 230 day timer. No, it won't be fully cooked when the thing dings - the lungs especially. Premature human babies do survive that young, but we've had a long time and lots of money poured into finding ways to make that happen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Goat gestation period are around 150 days .
Ibex is around 165 days .
Even if you take a healthy Ibex mother and remove the fetus after 150 days , it will have similar lung disability .
Lungs being the last thing to develop in a fetus , if you chop off the last few days of fetal development , you 're sacrificing lung function .
They wo n't work at 100 \ % , and they 'll be way more sensitive to any agitation .
It seems to me like a better approach would be to find an animal with a equal OR LONGER gestational period .
I do n't mean for Ibexes in particular ; it just makes sense for any mammal .
Try a mountain goat : 180 day average gestation period .
Just make sure you bust the little guy out two weeks early .
If humans go extinct and you implant human DNA into a bonobo , you 're putting something that takes 280 days to cook into an oven with a 230 day timer .
No , it wo n't be fully cooked when the thing dings - the lungs especially .
Premature human babies do survive that young , but we 've had a long time and lots of money poured into finding ways to make that happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Goat gestation period are around 150 days.
Ibex is around 165 days.
Even if you take a healthy Ibex mother and remove the fetus after 150 days, it will have similar lung disability.
Lungs being the last thing to develop in a fetus, if you chop off the last few days of fetal development, you're sacrificing lung function.
They won't work at 100\%, and they'll be way more sensitive to any agitation.
It seems to me like a better approach would be to find an animal with a equal OR LONGER gestational period.
I don't mean for Ibexes in particular; it just makes sense for any mammal.
Try a mountain goat: 180 day average gestation period.
Just make sure you bust the little guy out two weeks early.
If humans go extinct and you implant human DNA into a bonobo, you're putting something that takes 280 days to cook into an oven with a 230 day timer.
No, it won't be fully cooked when the thing dings - the lungs especially.
Premature human babies do survive that young, but we've had a long time and lots of money poured into finding ways to make that happen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576502</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261999200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm still waiting for them to do this with the wooly mammoth; logic dictates that if my ancestors hunted this species to extinction, they must have been REALLY tasty!</p></div><p>Logic dictates nothing of the sort.  It could be that mammoth meat tasted terrible, but a mammoth tusk was the standard price for a blowjob.  </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm still waiting for them to do this with the wooly mammoth ; logic dictates that if my ancestors hunted this species to extinction , they must have been REALLY tasty ! Logic dictates nothing of the sort .
It could be that mammoth meat tasted terrible , but a mammoth tusk was the standard price for a blowjob .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm still waiting for them to do this with the wooly mammoth; logic dictates that if my ancestors hunted this species to extinction, they must have been REALLY tasty!Logic dictates nothing of the sort.
It could be that mammoth meat tasted terrible, but a mammoth tusk was the standard price for a blowjob.  
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577706</id>
	<title>Re:A new first</title>
	<author>svtdragon</author>
	<datestamp>1262008440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...how <i>intrepid</i> of it.<br> <br>/ducks</htmltext>
<tokenext>...how intrepid of it .
/ducks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...how intrepid of it.
/ducks</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577950</id>
	<title>Be prepared</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1262010240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://google.com/search?q=do+ibexes+fear+fire" title="google.com">http://google.com/search?q=do+ibexes+fear+fire</a> [google.com]</p><p><a href="http://google.com/search?q=do+ibexes+fear+death" title="google.com">http://google.com/search?q=do+ibexes+fear+death</a> [google.com]</p><p><a href="http://google.com/search?q=protecting+my+home+from+ibex+attack" title="google.com">http://google.com/search?q=protecting+my+home+from+ibex+attack</a> [google.com]</p><p>(Ibices?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //google.com/search ? q = do + ibexes + fear + fire [ google.com ] http : //google.com/search ? q = do + ibexes + fear + death [ google.com ] http : //google.com/search ? q = protecting + my + home + from + ibex + attack [ google.com ] ( Ibices ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://google.com/search?q=do+ibexes+fear+fire [google.com]http://google.com/search?q=do+ibexes+fear+death [google.com]http://google.com/search?q=protecting+my+home+from+ibex+attack [google.com](Ibices?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578636</id>
	<title>Re:Intrepid Ibex</title>
	<author>El\_Oscuro</author>
	<datestamp>1262015820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey!  That is what I am runnin  [NO CARRIER]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey !
That is what I am runnin [ NO CARRIER ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey!
That is what I am runnin  [NO CARRIER]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576614</id>
	<title>Re:A new first</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1262000100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not very intrepid if you ask me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not very intrepid if you ask me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not very intrepid if you ask me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576192</id>
	<title>Re:Not exactly.</title>
	<author>PalmKiller</author>
	<datestamp>1261997280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well they might not have been all that tasty, but you got a lot of meat from one kill.  So laziness of man might have driven their extinction instead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well they might not have been all that tasty , but you got a lot of meat from one kill .
So laziness of man might have driven their extinction instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well they might not have been all that tasty, but you got a lot of meat from one kill.
So laziness of man might have driven their extinction instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575992</id>
	<title>Re:Call Dr Neil</title>
	<author>happy\_place</author>
	<datestamp>1261996380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually ressurrecting a goat is not the same as bringing back a T-Rex. But hey, at least we'll be able to feed it, if we ever do bring back the dinosaurs...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually ressurrecting a goat is not the same as bringing back a T-Rex .
But hey , at least we 'll be able to feed it , if we ever do bring back the dinosaurs.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually ressurrecting a goat is not the same as bringing back a T-Rex.
But hey, at least we'll be able to feed it, if we ever do bring back the dinosaurs...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575606</id>
	<title>No Problem...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261994700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>We can just patch the damaged or missing segments with frog DNA...</htmltext>
<tokenext>We can just patch the damaged or missing segments with frog DNA.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We can just patch the damaged or missing segments with frog DNA...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576036</id>
	<title>Re:Don't worry!</title>
	<author>JustOK</author>
	<datestamp>1261996620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I didn't know there was going to be a test. I thought it was just for fun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't know there was going to be a test .
I thought it was just for fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't know there was going to be a test.
I thought it was just for fun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575642</id>
	<title>Anyone else read this as</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261994760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"one of the goats finally gave birth to a female burrito"?<br>
'cause I sure did.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" one of the goats finally gave birth to a female burrito " ?
'cause I sure did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"one of the goats finally gave birth to a female burrito"?
'cause I sure did.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576214</id>
	<title>Nothing new here...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261997400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As mentioned before, this is not an exact clone.  The only thing this story proves is that they can create a hybrid animal (nothing new there) and that the researches who did this were dishonest about the product (nothing new there) and that the news media is full of a bunch of dolts with little desire or propensity for actual journalism (nothing new there either).  The only thing that was created was 7 minutes of suffering.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As mentioned before , this is not an exact clone .
The only thing this story proves is that they can create a hybrid animal ( nothing new there ) and that the researches who did this were dishonest about the product ( nothing new there ) and that the news media is full of a bunch of dolts with little desire or propensity for actual journalism ( nothing new there either ) .
The only thing that was created was 7 minutes of suffering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As mentioned before, this is not an exact clone.
The only thing this story proves is that they can create a hybrid animal (nothing new there) and that the researches who did this were dishonest about the product (nothing new there) and that the news media is full of a bunch of dolts with little desire or propensity for actual journalism (nothing new there either).
The only thing that was created was 7 minutes of suffering.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30580410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30581020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30580224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30585600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30580576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30581352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30581784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30580124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30584732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1641208_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579050
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575658
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576072
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575752
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30585600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578636
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30580224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575992
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577706
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576634
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30581352
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30580124
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579210
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30584732
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575996
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575924
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30581784
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30580410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576872
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575760
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575826
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577596
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576192
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30579252
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578542
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576212
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577902
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576502
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30580576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575852
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577398
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577106
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30577906
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578990
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575876
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576248
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30581020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575650
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30575646
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1641208.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30576392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1641208.30578944
</commentlist>
</conversation>
