<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_28_1438232</id>
	<title>Happy Birthday, Linus</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1262018220000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Glyn Moody writes <i>"Today is the birthday of Linus.  <a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/happy-birthday-linus">Just under 19 years ago</a>, on the first day the shops in Helsinki were open after the holidays, Linus rushed out and spent all his Christmas and birthday money on his first PC: a DX33 80386, with 4 Megs of RAM, no co-processor, and a 40 Megabyte hard disc.  Today, the kernel he wrote on that system powers <a href="http://www.top500.org/stats/list/34/osfam">90\% of the fastest supercomputers</a>, and is starting to find its way into more and more <a href="http://www.android.com/">smartphones</a> &mdash; not to mention everything in between.  What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Glyn Moody writes " Today is the birthday of Linus .
Just under 19 years ago , on the first day the shops in Helsinki were open after the holidays , Linus rushed out and spent all his Christmas and birthday money on his first PC : a DX33 80386 , with 4 Megs of RAM , no co-processor , and a 40 Megabyte hard disc .
Today , the kernel he wrote on that system powers 90 \ % of the fastest supercomputers , and is starting to find its way into more and more smartphones    not to mention everything in between .
What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glyn Moody writes "Today is the birthday of Linus.
Just under 19 years ago, on the first day the shops in Helsinki were open after the holidays, Linus rushed out and spent all his Christmas and birthday money on his first PC: a DX33 80386, with 4 Megs of RAM, no co-processor, and a 40 Megabyte hard disc.
Today, the kernel he wrote on that system powers 90\% of the fastest supercomputers, and is starting to find its way into more and more smartphones — not to mention everything in between.
What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574044</id>
	<title>Other things could have happened</title>
	<author>Stregano</author>
	<datestamp>1262029740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Like if he spent his money on porn</htmltext>
<tokenext>Like if he spent his money on porn</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like if he spent his money on porn</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574724</id>
	<title>Re:Grattis p&#229; f&#246;delsedagen!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262033100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>His mother tongue is indeed Swedish but like many of us Swedish-speaking Finns, he also speaks Finnish virtually natively.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>His mother tongue is indeed Swedish but like many of us Swedish-speaking Finns , he also speaks Finnish virtually natively .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His mother tongue is indeed Swedish but like many of us Swedish-speaking Finns, he also speaks Finnish virtually natively.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573120</id>
	<title>What kind of a Pentium is that?</title>
	<author>Tibor the Hun</author>
	<datestamp>1262025360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heey, DX33? What kind of a Pentium is that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heey , DX33 ?
What kind of a Pentium is that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heey, DX33?
What kind of a Pentium is that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576326</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate timeline...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261998180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh FFS RTFA!  Because he wanted to run Minix which had been ported to the 386!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh FFS RTFA !
Because he wanted to run Minix which had been ported to the 386 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh FFS RTFA!
Because he wanted to run Minix which had been ported to the 386!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573846</id>
	<title>If he spent his money on something else?</title>
	<author>okmijnuhb</author>
	<datestamp>1262028720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?<br> <br>
Well maybe the world's computers would run on hookers and blow?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else ?
Well maybe the world 's computers would run on hookers and blow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?
Well maybe the world's computers would run on hookers and blow?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572838</id>
	<title>Time travel</title>
	<author>mariox19</author>
	<datestamp>1262024100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone kills Hitler on his first time travel... and then there's Bill Gates.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone kills Hitler on his first time travel... and then there 's Bill Gates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone kills Hitler on his first time travel... and then there's Bill Gates.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572866</id>
	<title>Mac</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262024160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if he bought a Mac? It's a dead end for a kernel hacker I suppose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if he bought a Mac ?
It 's a dead end for a kernel hacker I suppose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if he bought a Mac?
It's a dead end for a kernel hacker I suppose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574968</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate timeline...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261991280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He started out with a VIC-20.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He started out with a VIC-20 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He started out with a VIC-20.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576302</id>
	<title>His birthday is too close to Christmas like mine.</title>
	<author>antdude</author>
	<datestamp>1261998000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See <a href="http://www.xkcd.com/680/" title="xkcd.com">http://www.xkcd.com/680/</a> [xkcd.com] why...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See http : //www.xkcd.com/680/ [ xkcd.com ] why... : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See http://www.xkcd.com/680/ [xkcd.com] why... :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572254</id>
	<title>A case of the pundays</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262021820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How would the world look different? It would be a whole GNU world.</p><p>BTW, Linus is 40 today, there seems to be no mention of that anywhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How would the world look different ?
It would be a whole GNU world.BTW , Linus is 40 today , there seems to be no mention of that anywhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How would the world look different?
It would be a whole GNU world.BTW, Linus is 40 today, there seems to be no mention of that anywhere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573772</id>
	<title>Re:this is what happened</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262028300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mod parent +1 funny</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod parent + 1 funny</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod parent +1 funny</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30581870</id>
	<title>Where would we be?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262101380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We'd be in a nice safe BSD world, without the awful Linux crap.</p><p>Yet, now, like Betamax versus VHS, the poorer version becomes the most popular</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 'd be in a nice safe BSD world , without the awful Linux crap.Yet , now , like Betamax versus VHS , the poorer version becomes the most popular</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We'd be in a nice safe BSD world, without the awful Linux crap.Yet, now, like Betamax versus VHS, the poorer version becomes the most popular</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30577366</id>
	<title>Re:A case of the pundays</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262005440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing Minix was stagnant, HURD was (and is) going in circles and BSD was mostly wallowing in the ivory towers of academia when Linus came along with the talent, motivation, commitment and dedication to bring Minix into the 21st century.</p><p>Happy birthday Linus, and thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing Minix was stagnant , HURD was ( and is ) going in circles and BSD was mostly wallowing in the ivory towers of academia when Linus came along with the talent , motivation , commitment and dedication to bring Minix into the 21st century.Happy birthday Linus , and thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing Minix was stagnant, HURD was (and is) going in circles and BSD was mostly wallowing in the ivory towers of academia when Linus came along with the talent, motivation, commitment and dedication to bring Minix into the 21st century.Happy birthday Linus, and thanks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572974</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't qualify for one-name status</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262024760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People may not know who Linus is?!?  WTF has happened to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.?</p><p>Oh, my mistake "Slashdot?", you may parse it wrong otherwise because "/." is not commonly used in English.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People may not know who Linus is ? ! ?
WTF has happened to / .
? Oh , my mistake " Slashdot ?
" , you may parse it wrong otherwise because " / .
" is not commonly used in English .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People may not know who Linus is?!?
WTF has happened to /.
?Oh, my mistake "Slashdot?
", you may parse it wrong otherwise because "/.
" is not commonly used in English.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572498</id>
	<title>Alternate Reality?</title>
	<author>The Redster!</author>
	<datestamp>1262022840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>2010 will be the year of Solaris on the Desktop!</htmltext>
<tokenext>2010 will be the year of Solaris on the Desktop !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2010 will be the year of Solaris on the Desktop!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572384</id>
	<title>Alternate timeline...</title>
	<author>Vexler</author>
	<datestamp>1262022300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If he had bought a Trash-80, would we all be programming Motorola chips today?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If he had bought a Trash-80 , would we all be programming Motorola chips today ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he had bought a Trash-80, would we all be programming Motorola chips today?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573116</id>
	<title>Powerful computer</title>
	<author>Dan East</author>
	<datestamp>1262025300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For his age, that was a pretty powerful first computer. I'm a few years younger than Linus, and my first computer was a TI-99/4A, followed by an Amiga 1000 (512K RAM, no HDD). I think many people of our generation started with floppy-based computers (Apple II, TRS-80, VIC-20, C64, Amiga) with less than 1 MB RAM.  I saved up for and purchased the Amiga from my job as a bagger at a grocery store.  Paid $750 for it used, and it came with a monitor and an external floppy drive (really saved on the disc swapping having two drives!).  That was right when the Amiga 500 was released.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For his age , that was a pretty powerful first computer .
I 'm a few years younger than Linus , and my first computer was a TI-99/4A , followed by an Amiga 1000 ( 512K RAM , no HDD ) .
I think many people of our generation started with floppy-based computers ( Apple II , TRS-80 , VIC-20 , C64 , Amiga ) with less than 1 MB RAM .
I saved up for and purchased the Amiga from my job as a bagger at a grocery store .
Paid $ 750 for it used , and it came with a monitor and an external floppy drive ( really saved on the disc swapping having two drives ! ) .
That was right when the Amiga 500 was released .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For his age, that was a pretty powerful first computer.
I'm a few years younger than Linus, and my first computer was a TI-99/4A, followed by an Amiga 1000 (512K RAM, no HDD).
I think many people of our generation started with floppy-based computers (Apple II, TRS-80, VIC-20, C64, Amiga) with less than 1 MB RAM.
I saved up for and purchased the Amiga from my job as a bagger at a grocery store.
Paid $750 for it used, and it came with a monitor and an external floppy drive (really saved on the disc swapping having two drives!).
That was right when the Amiga 500 was released.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572506</id>
	<title>DX33</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262022840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The DX had a math coprocessor

I had an SX</htmltext>
<tokenext>The DX had a math coprocessor I had an SX</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The DX had a math coprocessor

I had an SX</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30575872</id>
	<title>Re:We will never know</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1261995780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would bet on BSD. BSD was already around and once the court case was finished BSD would have jumped to the front of the pack IMHO.<br>Most of the GNU software would have been ported very quickly and KDE and probably GTK would have been written for BSD.<br>Hey I am a Linux user but the simple truth is if had not been for Linus it really would have been somebody else.  The 386 and GCC was available as was Tanenbaum's book.<br>I think that Tanenbaum  gets a little short changed in the whole free OS world. No he didn't write Linux and Linus didn't copy Minix. What did happen is Linus and probably every other person that worked on Linux back then did was read Tanenbaum's text book.  In that book he showed that it was possible for a human to write a real OS and even showed them how to do it.<br>Tanenbaum did what he wanted to do. He taught a lot of people how too write an OS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would bet on BSD .
BSD was already around and once the court case was finished BSD would have jumped to the front of the pack IMHO.Most of the GNU software would have been ported very quickly and KDE and probably GTK would have been written for BSD.Hey I am a Linux user but the simple truth is if had not been for Linus it really would have been somebody else .
The 386 and GCC was available as was Tanenbaum 's book.I think that Tanenbaum gets a little short changed in the whole free OS world .
No he did n't write Linux and Linus did n't copy Minix .
What did happen is Linus and probably every other person that worked on Linux back then did was read Tanenbaum 's text book .
In that book he showed that it was possible for a human to write a real OS and even showed them how to do it.Tanenbaum did what he wanted to do .
He taught a lot of people how too write an OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would bet on BSD.
BSD was already around and once the court case was finished BSD would have jumped to the front of the pack IMHO.Most of the GNU software would have been ported very quickly and KDE and probably GTK would have been written for BSD.Hey I am a Linux user but the simple truth is if had not been for Linus it really would have been somebody else.
The 386 and GCC was available as was Tanenbaum's book.I think that Tanenbaum  gets a little short changed in the whole free OS world.
No he didn't write Linux and Linus didn't copy Minix.
What did happen is Linus and probably every other person that worked on Linux back then did was read Tanenbaum's text book.
In that book he showed that it was possible for a human to write a real OS and even showed them how to do it.Tanenbaum did what he wanted to do.
He taught a lot of people how too write an OS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572688</id>
	<title>Re:386dx, no coprocessor?</title>
	<author>gregarican</author>
	<datestamp>1262023500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope that distinction didn't find its place until the Intel 80486 line of CPU's. Back during the 80386 days it was only differntiating between 16 and 32 bit handling --&gt; <a href="http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/386+DX" title="thefreedictionary.com">http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/386+DX</a> [thefreedictionary.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope that distinction did n't find its place until the Intel 80486 line of CPU 's .
Back during the 80386 days it was only differntiating between 16 and 32 bit handling -- &gt; http : //encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/386 + DX [ thefreedictionary.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope that distinction didn't find its place until the Intel 80486 line of CPU's.
Back during the 80386 days it was only differntiating between 16 and 32 bit handling --&gt; http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/386+DX [thefreedictionary.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573854</id>
	<title>Re:A case of the pundays</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1262028780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unfortunately, that's the kind of saying that we can't really verify as true or false until we've invented timeline sandboxes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , that 's the kind of saying that we ca n't really verify as true or false until we 've invented timeline sandboxes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, that's the kind of saying that we can't really verify as true or false until we've invented timeline sandboxes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572440</id>
	<title>this is what happened</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262022600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>If linux wouldn't bought a computer, this year would be probably the year GNU\Hurd would be finished. Gnome KDE etc would probably not exist.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If linux would n't bought a computer , this year would be probably the year GNU \ Hurd would be finished .
Gnome KDE etc would probably not exist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If linux wouldn't bought a computer, this year would be probably the year GNU\Hurd would be finished.
Gnome KDE etc would probably not exist.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572508</id>
	<title>Re:A case of the pundays</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262022840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Happy BDay to the Big L<br>What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?<br>Less Linux Fan Boys</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Happy BDay to the Big LWhat would the world look like had he spent his money on something else ? Less Linux Fan Boys</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Happy BDay to the Big LWhat would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?Less Linux Fan Boys</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30575444</id>
	<title>Maybe it's his social/PR skills that really count</title>
	<author>shoor</author>
	<datestamp>1261993680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Various people have suggested that FreeBSD or Hurd would have filled the breach if Linux hadn't come along (and maybe been better).  We'll never know for sure unless somebody finds a reliable way to view alternate timelines, but, I'd say there is evidence of non-technical issues in the GNU and FreeBSD camps that could have been showstoppers.  Somehow Linux stayed on course.  Was that a fluke or something to do with Linus and his personality?  I suspect that that was where Linus really made a difference, and without that, the suits might really have prevailed.  I think it would have been a disaster if Microsoft had captured the server market, and there was a real danger back in the 90s that that's just what would have happened.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Various people have suggested that FreeBSD or Hurd would have filled the breach if Linux had n't come along ( and maybe been better ) .
We 'll never know for sure unless somebody finds a reliable way to view alternate timelines , but , I 'd say there is evidence of non-technical issues in the GNU and FreeBSD camps that could have been showstoppers .
Somehow Linux stayed on course .
Was that a fluke or something to do with Linus and his personality ?
I suspect that that was where Linus really made a difference , and without that , the suits might really have prevailed .
I think it would have been a disaster if Microsoft had captured the server market , and there was a real danger back in the 90s that that 's just what would have happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Various people have suggested that FreeBSD or Hurd would have filled the breach if Linux hadn't come along (and maybe been better).
We'll never know for sure unless somebody finds a reliable way to view alternate timelines, but, I'd say there is evidence of non-technical issues in the GNU and FreeBSD camps that could have been showstoppers.
Somehow Linux stayed on course.
Was that a fluke or something to do with Linus and his personality?
I suspect that that was where Linus really made a difference, and without that, the suits might really have prevailed.
I think it would have been a disaster if Microsoft had captured the server market, and there was a real danger back in the 90s that that's just what would have happened.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572548</id>
	<title>386dx, no coprocessor?</title>
	<author>damn\_registrars</author>
	<datestamp>1262023020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps my memory is incorrect, but I thought the difference between the 80386sx and 80386dx was that the dx had a built-in math coprocessor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps my memory is incorrect , but I thought the difference between the 80386sx and 80386dx was that the dx had a built-in math coprocessor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps my memory is incorrect, but I thought the difference between the 80386sx and 80386dx was that the dx had a built-in math coprocessor.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573820</id>
	<title>Re:We will never know</title>
	<author>dgr73</author>
	<datestamp>1262028600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thank Tommy the Clown... err.. Linus Torvalds for starting the movement, but what we do now is completely different... riiiighht..</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thank Tommy the Clown... err.. Linus Torvalds for starting the movement , but what we do now is completely different... riiiighht. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thank Tommy the Clown... err.. Linus Torvalds for starting the movement, but what we do now is completely different... riiiighht..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572748</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't qualify for one-name status</title>
	<author>Bobby Onions</author>
	<datestamp>1262023740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You've surveyed the population of the world regarding this matter, and that was the finding of said survey?

Nope. You're just expressing your personal view.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've surveyed the population of the world regarding this matter , and that was the finding of said survey ?
Nope. You 're just expressing your personal view .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've surveyed the population of the world regarding this matter, and that was the finding of said survey?
Nope. You're just expressing your personal view.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572524</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate timeline...</title>
	<author>freddieb</author>
	<datestamp>1262022900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't you mean Zilog? ie Z80</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you mean Zilog ?
ie Z80</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you mean Zilog?
ie Z80</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574884</id>
	<title>Re:Powerful computer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261990800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It wasn't his first computer (that was a Sinclair QL iirc), just his first PC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was n't his first computer ( that was a Sinclair QL iirc ) , just his first PC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wasn't his first computer (that was a Sinclair QL iirc), just his first PC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574342</id>
	<title>Re:Powerful computer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262031120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was his first PC, not first computer, I belive a Sinclair QL was his first...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was his first PC , not first computer , I belive a Sinclair QL was his first.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was his first PC, not first computer, I belive a Sinclair QL was his first...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573760</id>
	<title>Now if only the kernel was stable</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262028300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe if he had started with something else I would be able to upgrade my machine and not have to recompile the video driver for a point.point.point-point.point release.  Linux is the only operating system in my network (Ubuntu, FreeBSD, OpenSolaris, Windows XP and Vista) that this is a problem for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe if he had started with something else I would be able to upgrade my machine and not have to recompile the video driver for a point.point.point-point.point release .
Linux is the only operating system in my network ( Ubuntu , FreeBSD , OpenSolaris , Windows XP and Vista ) that this is a problem for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe if he had started with something else I would be able to upgrade my machine and not have to recompile the video driver for a point.point.point-point.point release.
Linux is the only operating system in my network (Ubuntu, FreeBSD, OpenSolaris, Windows XP and Vista) that this is a problem for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572500</id>
	<title>DX or SX?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262022840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wasn't it the SX line that had the math coprocessor disabled?  My first computer (not counting my CoCo) was a 386 SX 20, which was cheaper than a DX for want of a coprocessor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't it the SX line that had the math coprocessor disabled ?
My first computer ( not counting my CoCo ) was a 386 SX 20 , which was cheaper than a DX for want of a coprocessor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't it the SX line that had the math coprocessor disabled?
My first computer (not counting my CoCo) was a 386 SX 20, which was cheaper than a DX for want of a coprocessor.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576486</id>
	<title>Re:Powerful computer</title>
	<author>aztracker1</author>
	<datestamp>1261999080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed, I could barely afford a used XT at around the same time...  Probably why I now have all Unicomp keyboards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed , I could barely afford a used XT at around the same time... Probably why I now have all Unicomp keyboards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed, I could barely afford a used XT at around the same time...  Probably why I now have all Unicomp keyboards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576740</id>
	<title>Re:Time travel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262000880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Although killing bill seems a little pointless on an alternate timeline without computers..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Although killing bill seems a little pointless on an alternate timeline without computers. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although killing bill seems a little pointless on an alternate timeline without computers..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30585128</id>
	<title>Re:Most Americans might</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262117940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And some people underestimate it. According to wikipedia:</p><blockquote><div><p>At its peak, Peanuts ran in over 2,600 newspapers, with a readership of 355 million in 75 countries, and was translated into 21 languages.</p></div></blockquote><p> That's a bit more than just North America.</p></div><p>That's still not MOST people, countries or languages.</p><p>Also, as others have pointed out, names would often be translated anyway.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And some people underestimate it .
According to wikipedia : At its peak , Peanuts ran in over 2,600 newspapers , with a readership of 355 million in 75 countries , and was translated into 21 languages .
That 's a bit more than just North America.That 's still not MOST people , countries or languages.Also , as others have pointed out , names would often be translated anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And some people underestimate it.
According to wikipedia:At its peak, Peanuts ran in over 2,600 newspapers, with a readership of 355 million in 75 countries, and was translated into 21 languages.
That's a bit more than just North America.That's still not MOST people, countries or languages.Also, as others have pointed out, names would often be translated anyway.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573400</id>
	<title>Re:A case of the pundays</title>
	<author>larry bagina</author>
	<datestamp>1262026560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Minix had license/redistribution issues.  It was used, but modifications could only be distributed as patches.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Minix had license/redistribution issues .
It was used , but modifications could only be distributed as patches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Minix had license/redistribution issues.
It was used, but modifications could only be distributed as patches.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30577752</id>
	<title>Re:DX or SX?</title>
	<author>Rufty</author>
	<datestamp>1262008740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Generally, what happened was 486DXs were made. If there was a flaw in the maths unit, that got disabled and it got badged 486SX. Flaw in the main CPU, but maths unit OK? Stand alone coprocessor. Same silicon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Generally , what happened was 486DXs were made .
If there was a flaw in the maths unit , that got disabled and it got badged 486SX .
Flaw in the main CPU , but maths unit OK ?
Stand alone coprocessor .
Same silicon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Generally, what happened was 486DXs were made.
If there was a flaw in the maths unit, that got disabled and it got badged 486SX.
Flaw in the main CPU, but maths unit OK?
Stand alone coprocessor.
Same silicon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574060</id>
	<title>Re:over 40</title>
	<author>Antique Geekmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1262029860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Linus invented 'git' much more recently, in 2005. If you haven't reviewed it for source control, and compared it to Subversion at Subversion's expense, I urge you to do so. It is lighter weight, \_far\_ faster, allows remote development far more easily, and actually pays attention to security with its far better handling of SSH keys and its  built-in GPG signatures for software tags.</p><p>I can also attest that you only give up on life at 40 if your first 40 years weren't worth living. And in that case, your age probably wasn't the problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Linus invented 'git ' much more recently , in 2005 .
If you have n't reviewed it for source control , and compared it to Subversion at Subversion 's expense , I urge you to do so .
It is lighter weight , \ _far \ _ faster , allows remote development far more easily , and actually pays attention to security with its far better handling of SSH keys and its built-in GPG signatures for software tags.I can also attest that you only give up on life at 40 if your first 40 years were n't worth living .
And in that case , your age probably was n't the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linus invented 'git' much more recently, in 2005.
If you haven't reviewed it for source control, and compared it to Subversion at Subversion's expense, I urge you to do so.
It is lighter weight, \_far\_ faster, allows remote development far more easily, and actually pays attention to security with its far better handling of SSH keys and its  built-in GPG signatures for software tags.I can also attest that you only give up on life at 40 if your first 40 years weren't worth living.
And in that case, your age probably wasn't the problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572716</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't qualify for one-name status</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262023620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't you know? The blanket-carrying kid grew up and wrote an operating system kernel!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't you know ?
The blanket-carrying kid grew up and wrote an operating system kernel !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't you know?
The blanket-carrying kid grew up and wrote an operating system kernel!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572436</id>
	<title>get real</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262022540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>exactly 0\% of "that kernel" is extant in today's Linux kernel.</p><p>Let's stop the Linus worship, m'kay? After the whole Alan Cox debacle, Linus was exposed for the total douche he is.</p><p>Open source would be a lot better off with a few less egomaniacs like Linus and a few more - dare I say it? - RMS's.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>exactly 0 \ % of " that kernel " is extant in today 's Linux kernel.Let 's stop the Linus worship , m'kay ?
After the whole Alan Cox debacle , Linus was exposed for the total douche he is.Open source would be a lot better off with a few less egomaniacs like Linus and a few more - dare I say it ?
- RMS 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>exactly 0\% of "that kernel" is extant in today's Linux kernel.Let's stop the Linus worship, m'kay?
After the whole Alan Cox debacle, Linus was exposed for the total douche he is.Open source would be a lot better off with a few less egomaniacs like Linus and a few more - dare I say it?
- RMS's.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576142</id>
	<title>Re:get real</title>
	<author>shentino</author>
	<datestamp>1261997100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As far as I'm concerned he's earned the right to be a douche.</p><p>Not that being a douche is a good thing, but IMHO his contributions to open source outweigh that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as I 'm concerned he 's earned the right to be a douche.Not that being a douche is a good thing , but IMHO his contributions to open source outweigh that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as I'm concerned he's earned the right to be a douche.Not that being a douche is a good thing, but IMHO his contributions to open source outweigh that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573662</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate timeline...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262027820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>If he had bought a Trash-80, would we all be programming Motorola chips today?</p></div><p>Maybe, but it wouldn't be because of the TRS-80, which had a Zilog Z80 CPU.</p></div><p>That depends which Trash-80 he bought...</p><p>The TRS-80 Models I, II, III and IV were based on Z80.  However, the TRS-80 Color Computers had Motorola CPUs.  The TRS-80 model 16 actually had both a Zilog Z80 and a Motorola 68000.</p><p>Sometimes I miss my Trash-80....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If he had bought a Trash-80 , would we all be programming Motorola chips today ? Maybe , but it would n't be because of the TRS-80 , which had a Zilog Z80 CPU.That depends which Trash-80 he bought...The TRS-80 Models I , II , III and IV were based on Z80 .
However , the TRS-80 Color Computers had Motorola CPUs .
The TRS-80 model 16 actually had both a Zilog Z80 and a Motorola 68000.Sometimes I miss my Trash-80... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he had bought a Trash-80, would we all be programming Motorola chips today?Maybe, but it wouldn't be because of the TRS-80, which had a Zilog Z80 CPU.That depends which Trash-80 he bought...The TRS-80 Models I, II, III and IV were based on Z80.
However, the TRS-80 Color Computers had Motorola CPUs.
The TRS-80 model 16 actually had both a Zilog Z80 and a Motorola 68000.Sometimes I miss my Trash-80....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572518</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate timeline...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262022900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If he had bought a Trash-80, would we all be programming Motorola chips today?</p></div><p>Maybe, but it wouldn't be because of the TRS-80, which had a Zilog Z80 CPU.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If he had bought a Trash-80 , would we all be programming Motorola chips today ? Maybe , but it would n't be because of the TRS-80 , which had a Zilog Z80 CPU .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he had bought a Trash-80, would we all be programming Motorola chips today?Maybe, but it wouldn't be because of the TRS-80, which had a Zilog Z80 CPU.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30583976</id>
	<title>Happy birthday, thanks for the present!</title>
	<author>hallux.sinister</author>
	<datestamp>1262112480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Best wishes for your birthday, Linus!  (I am confident he won't ever read this, but I wish it for him anyway.)  My computer is one of those running the descendent of what he wrote on that computer.  It's almost as if it was his birthday, and he ended up sharing his present with everyone on the planet... kids could stand to learn from this example of selflessness.<p>The story asked a rhetorical "how different would the world look today..." and the answer is:  Gates and Balmer are working on a time-machine, and plan to take one of those hermetically-sealed Macintosh machines back with them, along with the tools required to open it, and give that to Linus for his birthday, and hope he ends up as a hardware hacker instead!  ~Hal</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Best wishes for your birthday , Linus !
( I am confident he wo n't ever read this , but I wish it for him anyway .
) My computer is one of those running the descendent of what he wrote on that computer .
It 's almost as if it was his birthday , and he ended up sharing his present with everyone on the planet... kids could stand to learn from this example of selflessness.The story asked a rhetorical " how different would the world look today... " and the answer is : Gates and Balmer are working on a time-machine , and plan to take one of those hermetically-sealed Macintosh machines back with them , along with the tools required to open it , and give that to Linus for his birthday , and hope he ends up as a hardware hacker instead !
~ Hal</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Best wishes for your birthday, Linus!
(I am confident he won't ever read this, but I wish it for him anyway.
)  My computer is one of those running the descendent of what he wrote on that computer.
It's almost as if it was his birthday, and he ended up sharing his present with everyone on the planet... kids could stand to learn from this example of selflessness.The story asked a rhetorical "how different would the world look today..." and the answer is:  Gates and Balmer are working on a time-machine, and plan to take one of those hermetically-sealed Macintosh machines back with them, along with the tools required to open it, and give that to Linus for his birthday, and hope he ends up as a hardware hacker instead!
~Hal</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573652</id>
	<title>NeXT</title>
	<author>Darth Cider</author>
	<datestamp>1262027820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wanted a NeXT at that time. Man, $6500! But there was no Photoshop equivalent for NeXT, despite their photoshopped brochures, so I called their office in California (seriously) to see if they had any image manipulation software. The person on the phone, a very nice woman, only had scripts to read from. Later that week, though, I happened to see a piece of mail sent from the Free Software Foundation to a professor at my university. (Just the return address, not the contents of the letter.) That's when it first hit ME, that collaboration was an unstoppable idea, because code is modular and such. I had a terrible notion that it would all happen really quickly, that if I borrowed money to buy a NeXT, that free Photoshop-equivalent software would be available almost right away. I'm glad I waited for OS X.</p><p>So it's good that Linus came along with a much more realistic idea of time and what could be done with it, with perseverance. Kudos and happy birthday, Penguin person.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wanted a NeXT at that time .
Man , $ 6500 !
But there was no Photoshop equivalent for NeXT , despite their photoshopped brochures , so I called their office in California ( seriously ) to see if they had any image manipulation software .
The person on the phone , a very nice woman , only had scripts to read from .
Later that week , though , I happened to see a piece of mail sent from the Free Software Foundation to a professor at my university .
( Just the return address , not the contents of the letter .
) That 's when it first hit ME , that collaboration was an unstoppable idea , because code is modular and such .
I had a terrible notion that it would all happen really quickly , that if I borrowed money to buy a NeXT , that free Photoshop-equivalent software would be available almost right away .
I 'm glad I waited for OS X.So it 's good that Linus came along with a much more realistic idea of time and what could be done with it , with perseverance .
Kudos and happy birthday , Penguin person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wanted a NeXT at that time.
Man, $6500!
But there was no Photoshop equivalent for NeXT, despite their photoshopped brochures, so I called their office in California (seriously) to see if they had any image manipulation software.
The person on the phone, a very nice woman, only had scripts to read from.
Later that week, though, I happened to see a piece of mail sent from the Free Software Foundation to a professor at my university.
(Just the return address, not the contents of the letter.
) That's when it first hit ME, that collaboration was an unstoppable idea, because code is modular and such.
I had a terrible notion that it would all happen really quickly, that if I borrowed money to buy a NeXT, that free Photoshop-equivalent software would be available almost right away.
I'm glad I waited for OS X.So it's good that Linus came along with a much more realistic idea of time and what could be done with it, with perseverance.
Kudos and happy birthday, Penguin person.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576412</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate timeline...</title>
	<author>ghard</author>
	<datestamp>1261998660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Our school (in Finland) had a TRS-80 model I, on which I learned my first assembly language programming skillz. My dad had a model III. I myself did some contracting work when 15yrs old on a model 16, which was actually an I/O / modem bank front-end for an order processing system on an IBM system 38, with mobile clients using the model 100, sending the orders in and getting their itineraries back using slightly modified XMODEM-protocol.</p><p>So the short answer. Yes, they were available outside of USA and not just as the Dragons (which were rebranded Tandy/TRS-80 color computers.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Our school ( in Finland ) had a TRS-80 model I , on which I learned my first assembly language programming skillz .
My dad had a model III .
I myself did some contracting work when 15yrs old on a model 16 , which was actually an I/O / modem bank front-end for an order processing system on an IBM system 38 , with mobile clients using the model 100 , sending the orders in and getting their itineraries back using slightly modified XMODEM-protocol.So the short answer .
Yes , they were available outside of USA and not just as the Dragons ( which were rebranded Tandy/TRS-80 color computers .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our school (in Finland) had a TRS-80 model I, on which I learned my first assembly language programming skillz.
My dad had a model III.
I myself did some contracting work when 15yrs old on a model 16, which was actually an I/O / modem bank front-end for an order processing system on an IBM system 38, with mobile clients using the model 100, sending the orders in and getting their itineraries back using slightly modified XMODEM-protocol.So the short answer.
Yes, they were available outside of USA and not just as the Dragons (which were rebranded Tandy/TRS-80 color computers.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574364</id>
	<title>Netcraft Confirms</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262031180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>It is official; Netcraft now confirms: Linux is dying</b> </p><p>One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Linux community when IDC confirmed that Linux market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming close on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that Linux has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Linux is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test. </p><p>You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict Linux's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Linux faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Linux because Linux is dying. Things are looking very bad for Linux. As many of us are already aware, Linux continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood. </p><p>The most recent Linux kernel is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93\% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: Linux is dying. </p><p>Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers. </p><p>Linus Tovalds states that there are 7000 users of Linux 2.1. How many users of the lastest Linux kernel are there? Let's see. The number of Linux 2.1 versus Linux 2.2 posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 Linux 2.2 users. Linux 2.2 posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of Linux 2.1 posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of Linux 2.2. A recent article put Linux 2.1 at about 80 percent of the Linux market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 Linux 2.1 users. This is consistent with the number of Linux 2.1 Usenet posts. </p><p>Due to the legal troubles of Linux due to SCO litigation, abysmal sales and so on, Linux 2.2 went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house. </p><p>All major surveys show that Linux has steadily declined in market share. Linux is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Linux is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. Linux continues to decay. Nothing short of a cockeyed miracle could save Linux from its fate at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Linux is dead. </p><p><b>Fact: Linux is dying</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is official ; Netcraft now confirms : Linux is dying One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Linux community when IDC confirmed that Linux market share has dropped yet again , now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers .
Coming close on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that Linux has lost more market share , this news serves to reinforce what we 've known all along .
Linux is collapsing in complete disarray , as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test .
You do n't need to be a Kreskin to predict Linux 's future .
The hand writing is on the wall : Linux faces a bleak future .
In fact there wo n't be any future at all for Linux because Linux is dying .
Things are looking very bad for Linux .
As many of us are already aware , Linux continues to lose market share .
Red ink flows like a river of blood .
The most recent Linux kernel is the most endangered of them all , having lost 93 \ % of its core developers .
The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly .
There can no longer be any doubt : Linux is dying .
Let 's keep to the facts and look at the numbers .
Linus Tovalds states that there are 7000 users of Linux 2.1 .
How many users of the lastest Linux kernel are there ?
Let 's see .
The number of Linux 2.1 versus Linux 2.2 posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1 .
Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 Linux 2.2 users .
Linux 2.2 posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of Linux 2.1 posts .
Therefore there are about 700 users of Linux 2.2 .
A recent article put Linux 2.1 at about 80 percent of the Linux market .
Therefore there are ( 7000 + 1400 + 700 ) * 4 = 36400 Linux 2.1 users .
This is consistent with the number of Linux 2.1 Usenet posts .
Due to the legal troubles of Linux due to SCO litigation , abysmal sales and so on , Linux 2.2 went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS .
Now BSDI is also dead , its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house .
All major surveys show that Linux has steadily declined in market share .
Linux is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim .
If Linux is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers .
Linux continues to decay .
Nothing short of a cockeyed miracle could save Linux from its fate at this point in time .
For all practical purposes , Linux is dead .
Fact : Linux is dying</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is official; Netcraft now confirms: Linux is dying One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Linux community when IDC confirmed that Linux market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers.
Coming close on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that Linux has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along.
Linux is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict Linux's future.
The hand writing is on the wall: Linux faces a bleak future.
In fact there won't be any future at all for Linux because Linux is dying.
Things are looking very bad for Linux.
As many of us are already aware, Linux continues to lose market share.
Red ink flows like a river of blood.
The most recent Linux kernel is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93\% of its core developers.
The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly.
There can no longer be any doubt: Linux is dying.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
Linus Tovalds states that there are 7000 users of Linux 2.1.
How many users of the lastest Linux kernel are there?
Let's see.
The number of Linux 2.1 versus Linux 2.2 posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1.
Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 Linux 2.2 users.
Linux 2.2 posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of Linux 2.1 posts.
Therefore there are about 700 users of Linux 2.2.
A recent article put Linux 2.1 at about 80 percent of the Linux market.
Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 Linux 2.1 users.
This is consistent with the number of Linux 2.1 Usenet posts.
Due to the legal troubles of Linux due to SCO litigation, abysmal sales and so on, Linux 2.2 went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS.
Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.
All major surveys show that Linux has steadily declined in market share.
Linux is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim.
If Linux is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers.
Linux continues to decay.
Nothing short of a cockeyed miracle could save Linux from its fate at this point in time.
For all practical purposes, Linux is dead.
Fact: Linux is dying</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576622</id>
	<title>How Linus/Linux Affected PC World</title>
	<author>Velska1</author>
	<datestamp>1262000100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Linux has undoubtedly had an effect on PC world. I wonder if we can know really what that is, since it's hard to run alternative simulations in the real world, we only have this one history that is all-inclusive, if done right.</p><p>Linus is an example of how a project being controlled by a single actor can be very efficient in getting a fairly standardized product out (more so than many commercial operators), meaning, of course just the Kernel here.</p><p>In the future, I suppose it should become a committee effort, since there will be too many people, who want to influence it for him to work with eveyone, and too many people getting suspicious of the project being controlled by this Finnish-American guy, who may or may not have political ideas, too... Besides, the Chinese and the Russians already have their own ground-up distros that they use. They probably have government backdoors to every system???</p><p>And then the committee members will be bribed and boughtt by megacorporations and they will screw the development in behalf of their employers. Et cetera, et cetera...</p><p>Then, one day a guy goes out and buys a very basic computer and build a new kernel for a new kind of OS, because GNU/Linux has become such a f*@$kfest that you'll never be able to predict what's going to happen (if it doesn't end in some megacorp's pocket).</p><p>So no, I don't think that the world would have changed a lot. Perhaps Hurd would have gotten more attention, perhaps the BSD legal hassles would have been solved. Perhaps someone else would have created a kernel, and then been able to work with many people to make it better.</p><p>BTW, seems the Linus-mocking comments come from AC a lot. M$ fanbois or just people who like to yell "fire" in a full movie theatre?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux has undoubtedly had an effect on PC world .
I wonder if we can know really what that is , since it 's hard to run alternative simulations in the real world , we only have this one history that is all-inclusive , if done right.Linus is an example of how a project being controlled by a single actor can be very efficient in getting a fairly standardized product out ( more so than many commercial operators ) , meaning , of course just the Kernel here.In the future , I suppose it should become a committee effort , since there will be too many people , who want to influence it for him to work with eveyone , and too many people getting suspicious of the project being controlled by this Finnish-American guy , who may or may not have political ideas , too... Besides , the Chinese and the Russians already have their own ground-up distros that they use .
They probably have government backdoors to every system ? ?
? And then the committee members will be bribed and boughtt by megacorporations and they will screw the development in behalf of their employers .
Et cetera , et cetera...Then , one day a guy goes out and buys a very basic computer and build a new kernel for a new kind of OS , because GNU/Linux has become such a f * @ $ kfest that you 'll never be able to predict what 's going to happen ( if it does n't end in some megacorp 's pocket ) .So no , I do n't think that the world would have changed a lot .
Perhaps Hurd would have gotten more attention , perhaps the BSD legal hassles would have been solved .
Perhaps someone else would have created a kernel , and then been able to work with many people to make it better.BTW , seems the Linus-mocking comments come from AC a lot .
M $ fanbois or just people who like to yell " fire " in a full movie theatre ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux has undoubtedly had an effect on PC world.
I wonder if we can know really what that is, since it's hard to run alternative simulations in the real world, we only have this one history that is all-inclusive, if done right.Linus is an example of how a project being controlled by a single actor can be very efficient in getting a fairly standardized product out (more so than many commercial operators), meaning, of course just the Kernel here.In the future, I suppose it should become a committee effort, since there will be too many people, who want to influence it for him to work with eveyone, and too many people getting suspicious of the project being controlled by this Finnish-American guy, who may or may not have political ideas, too... Besides, the Chinese and the Russians already have their own ground-up distros that they use.
They probably have government backdoors to every system??
?And then the committee members will be bribed and boughtt by megacorporations and they will screw the development in behalf of their employers.
Et cetera, et cetera...Then, one day a guy goes out and buys a very basic computer and build a new kernel for a new kind of OS, because GNU/Linux has become such a f*@$kfest that you'll never be able to predict what's going to happen (if it doesn't end in some megacorp's pocket).So no, I don't think that the world would have changed a lot.
Perhaps Hurd would have gotten more attention, perhaps the BSD legal hassles would have been solved.
Perhaps someone else would have created a kernel, and then been able to work with many people to make it better.BTW, seems the Linus-mocking comments come from AC a lot.
M$ fanbois or just people who like to yell "fire" in a full movie theatre?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572742</id>
	<title>Most Americans might</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262023680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some North Americans really do overestimate the penetration of their own popular culture. Globally, <i>most people</i> wouldn't think of anyone at all. On Slashdot - Mr. Torvalds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some North Americans really do overestimate the penetration of their own popular culture .
Globally , most people would n't think of anyone at all .
On Slashdot - Mr. Torvalds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some North Americans really do overestimate the penetration of their own popular culture.
Globally, most people wouldn't think of anyone at all.
On Slashdot - Mr. Torvalds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573332</id>
	<title>Re:That's my first computer too</title>
	<author>trash eighty</author>
	<datestamp>1262026200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My first computer (that i bought myself) was a Unisys 386SX-33, 4MB of RAM. i had a massive 80MB harddrive though. for some reason i decided to install OS/2 2.1 on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My first computer ( that i bought myself ) was a Unisys 386SX-33 , 4MB of RAM .
i had a massive 80MB harddrive though .
for some reason i decided to install OS/2 2.1 on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My first computer (that i bought myself) was a Unisys 386SX-33, 4MB of RAM.
i had a massive 80MB harddrive though.
for some reason i decided to install OS/2 2.1 on it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573188</id>
	<title>Re:this is what happened</title>
	<author>LOLLinux</author>
	<datestamp>1262025540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If linux wouldn't bought a computer, this year would be probably the year GNU\Hurd would be finished.</p></div><p>Based on what reasoning?  Hurd is the Duke Nukem Forever of OS kernels.  It would have self-imploded with or without Linus and the Linux kernel.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If linux would n't bought a computer , this year would be probably the year GNU \ Hurd would be finished.Based on what reasoning ?
Hurd is the Duke Nukem Forever of OS kernels .
It would have self-imploded with or without Linus and the Linux kernel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If linux wouldn't bought a computer, this year would be probably the year GNU\Hurd would be finished.Based on what reasoning?
Hurd is the Duke Nukem Forever of OS kernels.
It would have self-imploded with or without Linus and the Linux kernel.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572458</id>
	<title>no co-proc?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262022660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A DX33 had a math co-processor, if it didn't it would have been an SX.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A DX33 had a math co-processor , if it did n't it would have been an SX .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A DX33 had a math co-processor, if it didn't it would have been an SX.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574028</id>
	<title>Linux's  Year?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262029680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So.. you're saying.. this is DEFINITELY the year of linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So.. you 're saying.. this is DEFINITELY the year of linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So.. you're saying.. this is DEFINITELY the year of linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573136</id>
	<title>Re:A case of the pundays</title>
	<author>hitmark</author>
	<datestamp>1262025420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i guess, but linux happened at the exact right time. Hurd was a mess (i think it was at its second or third rewrite at the time, trying for the last fad in kernel design), bsd was in court, minix was anything but open/free/whatever.</p><p>so in the end, linux was a case of scratching a itch, in combo with the choice between sitting in a heated room to write code or walk across a cold campus to access the university terminals. One can say that humans are at their most creative when they want to be lazy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i guess , but linux happened at the exact right time .
Hurd was a mess ( i think it was at its second or third rewrite at the time , trying for the last fad in kernel design ) , bsd was in court , minix was anything but open/free/whatever.so in the end , linux was a case of scratching a itch , in combo with the choice between sitting in a heated room to write code or walk across a cold campus to access the university terminals .
One can say that humans are at their most creative when they want to be lazy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i guess, but linux happened at the exact right time.
Hurd was a mess (i think it was at its second or third rewrite at the time, trying for the last fad in kernel design), bsd was in court, minix was anything but open/free/whatever.so in the end, linux was a case of scratching a itch, in combo with the choice between sitting in a heated room to write code or walk across a cold campus to access the university terminals.
One can say that humans are at their most creative when they want to be lazy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573164</id>
	<title>Re:get real</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262025480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Open source would be a lot better off with a few less egomaniacs like Linus and a few more - dare I say it? - RMS's.</p></div><p>RMS not an egomaniac?  lolwut?  The whole GNU/Linux or GNU+Linux thing is nothing but pure egomania on RMS's part.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Open source would be a lot better off with a few less egomaniacs like Linus and a few more - dare I say it ?
- RMS 's.RMS not an egomaniac ?
lolwut ? The whole GNU/Linux or GNU + Linux thing is nothing but pure egomania on RMS 's part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Open source would be a lot better off with a few less egomaniacs like Linus and a few more - dare I say it?
- RMS's.RMS not an egomaniac?
lolwut?  The whole GNU/Linux or GNU+Linux thing is nothing but pure egomania on RMS's part.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572836</id>
	<title>A undisclosed person said at his party</title>
	<author>jhoegl</author>
	<datestamp>1262024100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"What a nerd!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" What a nerd !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"What a nerd!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572512</id>
	<title>What if Tanenbaum hadn't written MINIX?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262022900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's the real question.

But today is about Happy Birthday to Linus!</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the real question .
But today is about Happy Birthday to Linus !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the real question.
But today is about Happy Birthday to Linus!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574626</id>
	<title>Re:get real</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262032500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uhh, you know that Alan Cox still works on the kernel, and basically apologized for causing the situation?  Moron.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uhh , you know that Alan Cox still works on the kernel , and basically apologized for causing the situation ?
Moron .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uhh, you know that Alan Cox still works on the kernel, and basically apologized for causing the situation?
Moron.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573140</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262025420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>his heart must be *truly* klingon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>his heart must be * truly * klingon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>his heart must be *truly* klingon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573916</id>
	<title>Re:Grattis p&#229; f&#246;delsedagen!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262029140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can hear him speak Swedish in Revolution OS, talking to his daughter, I believe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can hear him speak Swedish in Revolution OS , talking to his daughter , I believe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can hear him speak Swedish in Revolution OS, talking to his daughter, I believe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572448</id>
	<title>We will never know</title>
	<author>prefec2</author>
	<datestamp>1262022660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe without Linux we would use Minix or Hurd today. While Linus caused an crystallization point for hundreds of developers he did not write the thing alone. these people were already there. More or less waiting for something like this to happen. Most of them were already part of the Minix mailing list. So most likely Linux was already waiting to happen then. From my own time as an undergraduate. all the good programmers wanted to write an OS. And when it Linux came into existence everyone said cool. I take it and I do something with it. The same happened later with the browser as well. And if X11 would have had a better programming interface there would have been more different browsers out there. Still. Thanks to Linus for starting it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe without Linux we would use Minix or Hurd today .
While Linus caused an crystallization point for hundreds of developers he did not write the thing alone .
these people were already there .
More or less waiting for something like this to happen .
Most of them were already part of the Minix mailing list .
So most likely Linux was already waiting to happen then .
From my own time as an undergraduate .
all the good programmers wanted to write an OS .
And when it Linux came into existence everyone said cool .
I take it and I do something with it .
The same happened later with the browser as well .
And if X11 would have had a better programming interface there would have been more different browsers out there .
Still. Thanks to Linus for starting it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe without Linux we would use Minix or Hurd today.
While Linus caused an crystallization point for hundreds of developers he did not write the thing alone.
these people were already there.
More or less waiting for something like this to happen.
Most of them were already part of the Minix mailing list.
So most likely Linux was already waiting to happen then.
From my own time as an undergraduate.
all the good programmers wanted to write an OS.
And when it Linux came into existence everyone said cool.
I take it and I do something with it.
The same happened later with the browser as well.
And if X11 would have had a better programming interface there would have been more different browsers out there.
Still. Thanks to Linus for starting it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573042</id>
	<title>mod 3owVn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262025060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">their hand...she BSD culmin4ted in escape them by about who can rAnt Superior to slow, [tux.org]?  Are you EXPULSION OF IPF Deeper into the of Jordan Hubbard FreeBSD's Of Walnut Creek, need to scream that indecision and of playing your for trolls' you down. It was Leaving the play Minutes now while Engineering project lesson and of OpenBSD. How</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>their hand...she BSD culmin4ted in escape them by about who can rAnt Superior to slow , [ tux.org ] ?
Are you EXPULSION OF IPF Deeper into the of Jordan Hubbard FreeBSD 's Of Walnut Creek , need to scream that indecision and of playing your for trolls ' you down .
It was Leaving the play Minutes now while Engineering project lesson and of OpenBSD .
How [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>their hand...she BSD culmin4ted in escape them by about who can rAnt Superior to slow, [tux.org]?
Are you EXPULSION OF IPF Deeper into the of Jordan Hubbard FreeBSD's Of Walnut Creek, need to scream that indecision and of playing your for trolls' you down.
It was Leaving the play Minutes now while Engineering project lesson and of OpenBSD.
How [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574134</id>
	<title>Norwegian teletext</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262030160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Norwegian teletext mentioned it: <a href="http://www2.nrk.no/teksttv/?channel=1&amp;subpage=1&amp;cd=0&amp;page=456" title="www2.nrk.no" rel="nofollow">http://www2.nrk.no/teksttv/?channel=1&amp;subpage=1&amp;cd=0&amp;page=456</a> [www2.nrk.no]</p><p>1969         Den         finske         datautvikleren         Linus<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Torvalds        ble        f&#248;dt.        Han        utviklet<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; operativsystemet        Linux.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Norwegian teletext mentioned it : http : //www2.nrk.no/teksttv/ ? channel = 1&amp;subpage = 1&amp;cd = 0&amp;page = 456 [ www2.nrk.no ] 1969 Den finske datautvikleren Linus         Torvalds ble f   dt .
Han utviklet         operativsystemet Linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Norwegian teletext mentioned it: http://www2.nrk.no/teksttv/?channel=1&amp;subpage=1&amp;cd=0&amp;page=456 [www2.nrk.no]1969         Den         finske         datautvikleren         Linus
        Torvalds        ble        født.
Han        utviklet
        operativsystemet        Linux.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573660</id>
	<title>Re:over 40</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262027820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone knows "42" is the real milestone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone knows " 42 " is the real milestone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone knows "42" is the real milestone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30575174</id>
	<title>Re:Grattis p&#229; f&#246;delsedagen!</title>
	<author>Katchu</author>
	<datestamp>1261992300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ei, se on: Hyv&#228;&#228; syntym&#228;p&#228;iv&#228;&#228;, Linus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ei , se on : Hyv     syntym   p   iv     , Linus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ei, se on: Hyvää syntymäpäivää, Linus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30581966</id>
	<title>Re:We would probably have Gnu with another kernel.</title>
	<author>welsh git</author>
	<datestamp>1262101980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just because they can, doesn't mean they WILL. That's the main problem with the GNU fanbois.</p><p>Yahoo committed accept-filters back to FreeBSD.</p><p>Apple has released code and bug fixes.</p><p>There are MANY MANY more examples.</p><p>And it doesn't have to be done in good faith. There are many good reasons for a company to contribute code back to the main stream..</p><p>If you don't contribute the changes back, then every time you update the OS, you have to repatch your system with your changes, and may even have to do alot of work if there are API changes.</p><p>By committing the code to the project, you are reducing the amount of work you'll need to do, as other people will make sure your code remains current.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because they can , does n't mean they WILL .
That 's the main problem with the GNU fanbois.Yahoo committed accept-filters back to FreeBSD.Apple has released code and bug fixes.There are MANY MANY more examples.And it does n't have to be done in good faith .
There are many good reasons for a company to contribute code back to the main stream..If you do n't contribute the changes back , then every time you update the OS , you have to repatch your system with your changes , and may even have to do alot of work if there are API changes.By committing the code to the project , you are reducing the amount of work you 'll need to do , as other people will make sure your code remains current .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because they can, doesn't mean they WILL.
That's the main problem with the GNU fanbois.Yahoo committed accept-filters back to FreeBSD.Apple has released code and bug fixes.There are MANY MANY more examples.And it doesn't have to be done in good faith.
There are many good reasons for a company to contribute code back to the main stream..If you don't contribute the changes back, then every time you update the OS, you have to repatch your system with your changes, and may even have to do alot of work if there are API changes.By committing the code to the project, you are reducing the amount of work you'll need to do, as other people will make sure your code remains current.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572956</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate timeline...</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1262024640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, Amiga would have been also a very valid choice back then, at least in Europe. I wonder if Linus ever said why he went with a PC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , Amiga would have been also a very valid choice back then , at least in Europe .
I wonder if Linus ever said why he went with a PC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, Amiga would have been also a very valid choice back then, at least in Europe.
I wonder if Linus ever said why he went with a PC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572564</id>
	<title>Re:DX or SX?</title>
	<author>mother\_reincarnated</author>
	<datestamp>1262023080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's what I thought too, but we're just confusing it with the 486DX/SX...  The 386SX had a 16bit external bus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what I thought too , but we 're just confusing it with the 486DX/SX... The 386SX had a 16bit external bus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what I thought too, but we're just confusing it with the 486DX/SX...  The 386SX had a 16bit external bus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30580888</id>
	<title>Re:this is what happened</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262091420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me who thinks fuck the GNU prefix already? RMS is either wrong, or we should add a letter to signify everyone who contributes to open source, not just to those who contribute to his project of choice</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me who thinks fuck the GNU prefix already ?
RMS is either wrong , or we should add a letter to signify everyone who contributes to open source , not just to those who contribute to his project of choice</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me who thinks fuck the GNU prefix already?
RMS is either wrong, or we should add a letter to signify everyone who contributes to open source, not just to those who contribute to his project of choice</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573790</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate timeline...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262028420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually the Tandy Color Computer line used a Motorola 6809 CPU and not the Z80<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually the Tandy Color Computer line used a Motorola 6809 CPU and not the Z80 : -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually the Tandy Color Computer line used a Motorola 6809 CPU and not the Z80 :-P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573354</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate timeline...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262026320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>was the TRS-80 even available outside of USA?</p><p>btw, he started out on this:<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair\_QL" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair\_QL</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>if the opening of the article is correct. Only when he reached university did he get the 386...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>was the TRS-80 even available outside of USA ? btw , he started out on this : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair \ _QL [ wikipedia.org ] if the opening of the article is correct .
Only when he reached university did he get the 386.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>was the TRS-80 even available outside of USA?btw, he started out on this:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair\_QL [wikipedia.org]if the opening of the article is correct.
Only when he reached university did he get the 386...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30575454</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't qualify for one-name status</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261993740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Didn't you know? The blanket-carrying kid grew up and wrote an operating system kernel!</p></div><p>... And he called it 'Peanux'...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't you know ?
The blanket-carrying kid grew up and wrote an operating system kernel ! .. .
And he called it 'Peanux'.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't you know?
The blanket-carrying kid grew up and wrote an operating system kernel!...
And he called it 'Peanux'...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574790</id>
	<title>We would probably have Gnu with another kernel.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262033520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While i dont want to belittle Linus work i think that GNU would just have another kernel and be about as popular as of now.</p><p>The reason i think that is that im my mind the GPL license and GNU was the single most significant factor to GNU/Linux success. If Linus had went for eg. a BSD license Linux would be a mostly one man show were people took Linux code, altered it and didnt return anything back. Now, thanks to the GPL, we have numoreous companies working together on the same code and nobody can take the code and hide it away.</p><p>The Linux kernel wouldnt do that much by itself without all the various GPL code that it fits in with. Personally i would love if there was more active kernels in use with GNU. A standardized API for drivers would also be nice. That way it would be immensely easier for new kernel/OS projects to lift off the ground.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While i dont want to belittle Linus work i think that GNU would just have another kernel and be about as popular as of now.The reason i think that is that im my mind the GPL license and GNU was the single most significant factor to GNU/Linux success .
If Linus had went for eg .
a BSD license Linux would be a mostly one man show were people took Linux code , altered it and didnt return anything back .
Now , thanks to the GPL , we have numoreous companies working together on the same code and nobody can take the code and hide it away.The Linux kernel wouldnt do that much by itself without all the various GPL code that it fits in with .
Personally i would love if there was more active kernels in use with GNU .
A standardized API for drivers would also be nice .
That way it would be immensely easier for new kernel/OS projects to lift off the ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While i dont want to belittle Linus work i think that GNU would just have another kernel and be about as popular as of now.The reason i think that is that im my mind the GPL license and GNU was the single most significant factor to GNU/Linux success.
If Linus had went for eg.
a BSD license Linux would be a mostly one man show were people took Linux code, altered it and didnt return anything back.
Now, thanks to the GPL, we have numoreous companies working together on the same code and nobody can take the code and hide it away.The Linux kernel wouldnt do that much by itself without all the various GPL code that it fits in with.
Personally i would love if there was more active kernels in use with GNU.
A standardized API for drivers would also be nice.
That way it would be immensely easier for new kernel/OS projects to lift off the ground.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572722</id>
	<title>Re:A case of the pundays</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262023620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>As the saying goes, Linux was an idea whose time had come. If it weren't for Linus, someone else would have invented another similar OS, or one of the existing (Hurd, BSD, Minix) would have been used. All the people, the culture, the computers and the communication medium were there, ready to give birth to such a thing.<p>
Still, Linus has been a great leader, and a tasteful (for some) architect. Thanks a lt for that !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As the saying goes , Linux was an idea whose time had come .
If it were n't for Linus , someone else would have invented another similar OS , or one of the existing ( Hurd , BSD , Minix ) would have been used .
All the people , the culture , the computers and the communication medium were there , ready to give birth to such a thing .
Still , Linus has been a great leader , and a tasteful ( for some ) architect .
Thanks a lt for that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As the saying goes, Linux was an idea whose time had come.
If it weren't for Linus, someone else would have invented another similar OS, or one of the existing (Hurd, BSD, Minix) would have been used.
All the people, the culture, the computers and the communication medium were there, ready to give birth to such a thing.
Still, Linus has been a great leader, and a tasteful (for some) architect.
Thanks a lt for that !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572408</id>
	<title>blinded</title>
	<author>prgrmr</author>
	<datestamp>1262022420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He could have bought an Official Red Ryder, Carbine-Action, Two-Hundred-Shot, Range Model Air Rifle.
<br> <br>
And then shot his eye out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He could have bought an Official Red Ryder , Carbine-Action , Two-Hundred-Shot , Range Model Air Rifle .
And then shot his eye out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He could have bought an Official Red Ryder, Carbine-Action, Two-Hundred-Shot, Range Model Air Rifle.
And then shot his eye out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572604</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't qualify for one-name status</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1262023200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>most people think of the blanket-carrying kid in Peanuts.</i></p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Perhaps anywhere else, but not here on slashdot. And a heads up: RMS usually refers to Richard Matthew Stallman, not Root Mean Square... even though most of us here know the uses of the latter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>most people think of the blanket-carrying kid in Peanuts .
      Perhaps anywhere else , but not here on slashdot .
And a heads up : RMS usually refers to Richard Matthew Stallman , not Root Mean Square... even though most of us here know the uses of the latter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>most people think of the blanket-carrying kid in Peanuts.
      Perhaps anywhere else, but not here on slashdot.
And a heads up: RMS usually refers to Richard Matthew Stallman, not Root Mean Square... even though most of us here know the uses of the latter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573926</id>
	<title>Re:Most Americans might</title>
	<author>Eevee</author>
	<datestamp>1262029200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And some people underestimate it. According to wikipedia:<blockquote><div><p>At its peak, Peanuts ran in over 2,600 newspapers, with a readership of 355 million in 75 countries, and was translated into 21 languages.</p></div></blockquote><p> That's a bit more than just North America.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And some people underestimate it .
According to wikipedia : At its peak , Peanuts ran in over 2,600 newspapers , with a readership of 355 million in 75 countries , and was translated into 21 languages .
That 's a bit more than just North America .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And some people underestimate it.
According to wikipedia:At its peak, Peanuts ran in over 2,600 newspapers, with a readership of 355 million in 75 countries, and was translated into 21 languages.
That's a bit more than just North America.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30585406</id>
	<title>Sinclair QL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262119260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But remember that before his PC, Linus had a Sinclair QL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But remember that before his PC , Linus had a Sinclair QL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But remember that before his PC, Linus had a Sinclair QL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573028</id>
	<title>My best guess</title>
	<author>Zero\_\_Kelvin</author>
	<datestamp>1262024940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm an optimist, so I'd like to think it would look something like <a href="http://thenextweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/bsod.bmp" title="thenextweb.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [thenextweb.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm an optimist , so I 'd like to think it would look something like this [ thenextweb.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm an optimist, so I'd like to think it would look something like this [thenextweb.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573320</id>
	<title>What if Linus had bought a mac?</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1262026140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?</p></div></blockquote><p>Maybe he would have bought a mac, developed an appreciation for user experience design at the start of a project, collaborated with usability experts to design a free standardized user friendly UI when he first started work on Linux, and today Linux on the desktop might be light-years ahead of where it currently is.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else ? Maybe he would have bought a mac , developed an appreciation for user experience design at the start of a project , collaborated with usability experts to design a free standardized user friendly UI when he first started work on Linux , and today Linux on the desktop might be light-years ahead of where it currently is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?Maybe he would have bought a mac, developed an appreciation for user experience design at the start of a project, collaborated with usability experts to design a free standardized user friendly UI when he first started work on Linux, and today Linux on the desktop might be light-years ahead of where it currently is.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573110</id>
	<title>Linus has made one unforgivable mistake.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262025300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=19771" title="freestateproject.org" rel="nofollow"> <b>GPL</b> </a> [freestateproject.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GPL [ freestateproject.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> GPL  [freestateproject.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510</id>
	<title>Doesn't qualify for one-name status</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262022840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mr. Torvalds may be well known, but when you use just the single name "Linus", most people think of the blanket-carrying kid in Peanuts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr. Torvalds may be well known , but when you use just the single name " Linus " , most people think of the blanket-carrying kid in Peanuts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr. Torvalds may be well known, but when you use just the single name "Linus", most people think of the blanket-carrying kid in Peanuts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572656</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't qualify for one-name status</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262023380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Citation needed.</p><p>1) Nerd site.<br>2) Mentions "Linus".<br>3) You think of the Peanuts strip.</p><p>Please turn in your geek card on your way out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Citation needed.1 ) Nerd site.2 ) Mentions " Linus " .3 ) You think of the Peanuts strip.Please turn in your geek card on your way out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Citation needed.1) Nerd site.2) Mentions "Linus".3) You think of the Peanuts strip.Please turn in your geek card on your way out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30581734</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't qualify for one-name status</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262100360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Mr. Torvalds may be well known, but when you use just the single name "Linus", most people think of the blanket-carrying kid in Peanuts.</p></div><p>Actually, most Swedes (inluding Finland-Swedes) in the same age group as Linus Torvalds think of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fak0jM2EWL4" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Linus p&#229; linjen</a> [youtube.com], the Swedish name of a series of Italian (?) animations that was really popular in Swedish television in the 70's and 80's. I don't think many Swedes would think about Peanuts, it's actually more possible they would think of Linus Torvalds (despite Sweden and Finland being very MS Windows dominated and Linux being practically unknown).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr. Torvalds may be well known , but when you use just the single name " Linus " , most people think of the blanket-carrying kid in Peanuts.Actually , most Swedes ( inluding Finland-Swedes ) in the same age group as Linus Torvalds think of Linus p   linjen [ youtube.com ] , the Swedish name of a series of Italian ( ?
) animations that was really popular in Swedish television in the 70 's and 80 's .
I do n't think many Swedes would think about Peanuts , it 's actually more possible they would think of Linus Torvalds ( despite Sweden and Finland being very MS Windows dominated and Linux being practically unknown ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr. Torvalds may be well known, but when you use just the single name "Linus", most people think of the blanket-carrying kid in Peanuts.Actually, most Swedes (inluding Finland-Swedes) in the same age group as Linus Torvalds think of Linus på linjen [youtube.com], the Swedish name of a series of Italian (?
) animations that was really popular in Swedish television in the 70's and 80's.
I don't think many Swedes would think about Peanuts, it's actually more possible they would think of Linus Torvalds (despite Sweden and Finland being very MS Windows dominated and Linux being practically unknown).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576886</id>
	<title>Hj&#228;rtliga gratulationer p&#229; f&#246;delsed</title>
	<author>TxRv</author>
	<datestamp>1262001840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope that's grammatically correct...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope that 's grammatically correct.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope that's grammatically correct...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30579884</id>
	<title>Somewhere in an alternate universe...</title>
	<author>dushkin</author>
	<datestamp>1262118360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cartoon flashback ripples...</p><p>"Today is the birthday of Linus. Just under 19 years ago, on the first day the shops in Helsinki were open after the holidays, Linus rushed out and spent all his Christmas and birthday money on his first PC: a DX33 80386, with 4 Megs of RAM, no co-processor, and a 40 Megabyte hard disc. Today, the MIND CONTROL SOFTWARE he wrote on that system powers 90\% of the world's ROBOTIC OVERLORD SLAVEMASTERS, and is starting to find its way into more HUMAN SLAVE COLLARS &mdash; not to mention HYPNO-ROBOTIC IMPLANTS. What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cartoon flashback ripples... " Today is the birthday of Linus .
Just under 19 years ago , on the first day the shops in Helsinki were open after the holidays , Linus rushed out and spent all his Christmas and birthday money on his first PC : a DX33 80386 , with 4 Megs of RAM , no co-processor , and a 40 Megabyte hard disc .
Today , the MIND CONTROL SOFTWARE he wrote on that system powers 90 \ % of the world 's ROBOTIC OVERLORD SLAVEMASTERS , and is starting to find its way into more HUMAN SLAVE COLLARS    not to mention HYPNO-ROBOTIC IMPLANTS .
What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cartoon flashback ripples..."Today is the birthday of Linus.
Just under 19 years ago, on the first day the shops in Helsinki were open after the holidays, Linus rushed out and spent all his Christmas and birthday money on his first PC: a DX33 80386, with 4 Megs of RAM, no co-processor, and a 40 Megabyte hard disc.
Today, the MIND CONTROL SOFTWARE he wrote on that system powers 90\% of the world's ROBOTIC OVERLORD SLAVEMASTERS, and is starting to find its way into more HUMAN SLAVE COLLARS — not to mention HYPNO-ROBOTIC IMPLANTS.
What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572734</id>
	<title>no, you're wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262023680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You fail your nerd lore. Turn in your nerd badge immediately.</p><p>80386DX had a 32-bit bus and came in a small PGA package. and 80386SX was only 16-bit(24-bit address) and generally was not socketable. There was a mathco for each, the 80387DX was a PGA package, the SX was a PLCC package.</p><p>80486DX has a math co and the SX did not (both 486 models were 32-bit bus and could fit in the same socket)</p><p>I miss my 80386DX+80387mathco system. it was a sweet setup.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You fail your nerd lore .
Turn in your nerd badge immediately.80386DX had a 32-bit bus and came in a small PGA package .
and 80386SX was only 16-bit ( 24-bit address ) and generally was not socketable .
There was a mathco for each , the 80387DX was a PGA package , the SX was a PLCC package.80486DX has a math co and the SX did not ( both 486 models were 32-bit bus and could fit in the same socket ) I miss my 80386DX + 80387mathco system .
it was a sweet setup .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You fail your nerd lore.
Turn in your nerd badge immediately.80386DX had a 32-bit bus and came in a small PGA package.
and 80386SX was only 16-bit(24-bit address) and generally was not socketable.
There was a mathco for each, the 80387DX was a PGA package, the SX was a PLCC package.80486DX has a math co and the SX did not (both 486 models were 32-bit bus and could fit in the same socket)I miss my 80386DX+80387mathco system.
it was a sweet setup.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30579628</id>
	<title>In another world...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262027280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Today is the birthday of Linus. Just under 19 years ago, on the first day the shops in Helsinki were open after the holidays, Linus rushed out and spent all his Christmas and birthday money on his first car. Today, the customizations he made to that automobile can be found in 90\% of the fastest flying cars, and is starting to find its way into more and more bullet trains and interstellar space ships &mdash; not to mention everything in between. What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Today is the birthday of Linus .
Just under 19 years ago , on the first day the shops in Helsinki were open after the holidays , Linus rushed out and spent all his Christmas and birthday money on his first car .
Today , the customizations he made to that automobile can be found in 90 \ % of the fastest flying cars , and is starting to find its way into more and more bullet trains and interstellar space ships    not to mention everything in between .
What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Today is the birthday of Linus.
Just under 19 years ago, on the first day the shops in Helsinki were open after the holidays, Linus rushed out and spent all his Christmas and birthday money on his first car.
Today, the customizations he made to that automobile can be found in 90\% of the fastest flying cars, and is starting to find its way into more and more bullet trains and interstellar space ships — not to mention everything in between.
What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30578998</id>
	<title>Re:Grattis p&#229; f&#246;delsedagen!</title>
	<author>Rennt</author>
	<datestamp>1262020140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, I'm just impressed you got slashdot to display those characters properly, show off!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , I 'm just impressed you got slashdot to display those characters properly , show off !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, I'm just impressed you got slashdot to display those characters properly, show off!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573826</id>
	<title>Re:We will never know</title>
	<author>captaindomon</author>
	<datestamp>1262028660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Blasphemer! None shall belittle His Linuxship! He suggesteth that Linus did not create the world in seven days, but instead the Linux world evolved over time, from earlier ancestors, with many different contributions! Burn the witch!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Blasphemer !
None shall belittle His Linuxship !
He suggesteth that Linus did not create the world in seven days , but instead the Linux world evolved over time , from earlier ancestors , with many different contributions !
Burn the witch !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blasphemer!
None shall belittle His Linuxship!
He suggesteth that Linus did not create the world in seven days, but instead the Linux world evolved over time, from earlier ancestors, with many different contributions!
Burn the witch!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30575798</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>Marthisdil</author>
	<datestamp>1261995480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?"

Not much different.  Sure on the backend it's made huge inroads.  But to most people of the world, Linux doesn't mean squat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else ?
" Not much different .
Sure on the backend it 's made huge inroads .
But to most people of the world , Linux does n't mean squat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?
"

Not much different.
Sure on the backend it's made huge inroads.
But to most people of the world, Linux doesn't mean squat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572786</id>
	<title>Re:386dx, no coprocessor?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262023860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope, with the 386-series. the SX version had a cut-down external (286-like) interface design - 16-bit data lines and a 24-bit address bus, but the DX version had full 32-bit external data &amp; address interfaces.</p><p>The SX/DX co-processor distinction came in with the 486</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope , with the 386-series .
the SX version had a cut-down external ( 286-like ) interface design - 16-bit data lines and a 24-bit address bus , but the DX version had full 32-bit external data &amp; address interfaces.The SX/DX co-processor distinction came in with the 486</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope, with the 386-series.
the SX version had a cut-down external (286-like) interface design - 16-bit data lines and a 24-bit address bus, but the DX version had full 32-bit external data &amp; address interfaces.The SX/DX co-processor distinction came in with the 486</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572612</id>
	<title>Re:386dx, no coprocessor?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262023260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're thinking of the 80486 line, in which the "DX" meant it had a co-processor installed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're thinking of the 80486 line , in which the " DX " meant it had a co-processor installed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're thinking of the 80486 line, in which the "DX" meant it had a co-processor installed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572730</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't qualify for one-name status</title>
	<author>British</author>
	<datestamp>1262023680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is slashdot. Half the acronyms posted to the news headers are lost on me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is slashdot .
Half the acronyms posted to the news headers are lost on me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is slashdot.
Half the acronyms posted to the news headers are lost on me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572698</id>
	<title>Re:DX33</title>
	<author>dingen</author>
	<datestamp>1262023560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, that's the 80486. With the 80386, DX meant you got a full 32 bit CPU, instead of partly 16 bit one with the SX.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , that 's the 80486 .
With the 80386 , DX meant you got a full 32 bit CPU , instead of partly 16 bit one with the SX .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, that's the 80486.
With the 80386, DX meant you got a full 32 bit CPU, instead of partly 16 bit one with the SX.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30577758</id>
	<title>Re:this is what happened</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262008740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>GNU\Hurd would be finished</p></div><p>Hurd has been finished for about a dozen years. Unfortunately nobody noticed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>GNU \ Hurd would be finishedHurd has been finished for about a dozen years .
Unfortunately nobody noticed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GNU\Hurd would be finishedHurd has been finished for about a dozen years.
Unfortunately nobody noticed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572602</id>
	<title>Happy Birthday!</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1262023200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And, many happy more!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And , many happy more !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And, many happy more!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573160</id>
	<title>Grattis p&#229; f&#246;delsedagen!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262025480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ja m&#229; han leva uti hundrade &#229;r!
<br> <br>
OK, I'm showing off -  I lived in Sweden 18 years, became fluent in Swedish, and I'm guessing (from his name) that Linus is mother tongue Swedish rather than Finnish.
<br>
But we're raising a glass and shouting "Sk&#229;l" and "Gippis" and so on...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ja m   han leva uti hundrade   r !
OK , I 'm showing off - I lived in Sweden 18 years , became fluent in Swedish , and I 'm guessing ( from his name ) that Linus is mother tongue Swedish rather than Finnish .
But we 're raising a glass and shouting " Sk   l " and " Gippis " and so on.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ja må han leva uti hundrade år!
OK, I'm showing off -  I lived in Sweden 18 years, became fluent in Swedish, and I'm guessing (from his name) that Linus is mother tongue Swedish rather than Finnish.
But we're raising a glass and shouting "Skål" and "Gippis" and so on...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574458</id>
	<title>What if</title>
	<author>MoZ-RedShirt</author>
	<datestamp>1262031660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?</i></p><p>Good question<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGegKKF2Xpw" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGegKKF2Xpw</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else ? Good question ...http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = OGegKKF2Xpw [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would the world look like had he spent his money on something else?Good question ...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGegKKF2Xpw [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30581924</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe it's his social/PR skills that really cou</title>
	<author>welsh git</author>
	<datestamp>1262101740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mod parent up!</p><p>I'm a FreeBSD guy through and through, but it does seem possible that without Linux, Microsoft could have indeed captured the server market, as you say.</p><p>Where I worked in the late 90's, they started replacing alot of their working unix systems with more expenesive, less reliable windows servers, where different departments (os support/db support/application support) had to 'book' time on the machines to get work done without clashing with anyone else<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-(</p><p>Needles to say, they effectively went bust a few years later, but at that time, MS was making real inroads that linux has helped thwart.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod parent up ! I 'm a FreeBSD guy through and through , but it does seem possible that without Linux , Microsoft could have indeed captured the server market , as you say.Where I worked in the late 90 's , they started replacing alot of their working unix systems with more expenesive , less reliable windows servers , where different departments ( os support/db support/application support ) had to 'book ' time on the machines to get work done without clashing with anyone else : - ( Needles to say , they effectively went bust a few years later , but at that time , MS was making real inroads that linux has helped thwart .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod parent up!I'm a FreeBSD guy through and through, but it does seem possible that without Linux, Microsoft could have indeed captured the server market, as you say.Where I worked in the late 90's, they started replacing alot of their working unix systems with more expenesive, less reliable windows servers, where different departments (os support/db support/application support) had to 'book' time on the machines to get work done without clashing with anyone else :-(Needles to say, they effectively went bust a few years later, but at that time, MS was making real inroads that linux has helped thwart.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30575444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572756</id>
	<title>That's my first computer too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262023740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>DX33 80386, with 4 Megs of RAM, no co-processor, and a 40 Megabyte hard disc</p></div><p>That's almost exactly my first computer too. Altough I really had a 20 MB harddisk, but I used doublespace to get 40 MB. And I didn't have the Intel DX33, but the Cyrix DX40 instead. That 7 MHz really made the difference.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>DX33 80386 , with 4 Megs of RAM , no co-processor , and a 40 Megabyte hard discThat 's almost exactly my first computer too .
Altough I really had a 20 MB harddisk , but I used doublespace to get 40 MB .
And I did n't have the Intel DX33 , but the Cyrix DX40 instead .
That 7 MHz really made the difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DX33 80386, with 4 Megs of RAM, no co-processor, and a 40 Megabyte hard discThat's almost exactly my first computer too.
Altough I really had a 20 MB harddisk, but I used doublespace to get 40 MB.
And I didn't have the Intel DX33, but the Cyrix DX40 instead.
That 7 MHz really made the difference.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572904</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate timeline...</title>
	<author>ghard</author>
	<datestamp>1262024400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>If he had bought a Trash-80, would we all be programming Motorola chips today?</p></div><p>Maybe, but it wouldn't be because of the TRS-80, which had a Zilog Z80 CPU.</p></div><p>I beg to differ - I've written C on TRS-80 model 16 with XENIX - it had MC68k and Z80 for bootstrap, which was used as I/O co-processor once the 68k system was up, It also had dual 8" floppies, and an 8MB (!!) hard disk which was larger than a modern desktop PC chassis.</p><p>Also the parent got the time wrong - affordable i386-based systems didn't really co-exist with TRS-80 - and the price of a Trash - even a Z80-based model would've definitely been more than you'd be able to buy with your Xmas cash in Finland those days.</p><p>interception Osama ICE freedom Abbas COSCO threat morse Comirex AMEMB<br>Peking Defcon DES INS Attorney General</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If he had bought a Trash-80 , would we all be programming Motorola chips today ? Maybe , but it would n't be because of the TRS-80 , which had a Zilog Z80 CPU.I beg to differ - I 've written C on TRS-80 model 16 with XENIX - it had MC68k and Z80 for bootstrap , which was used as I/O co-processor once the 68k system was up , It also had dual 8 " floppies , and an 8MB ( ! !
) hard disk which was larger than a modern desktop PC chassis.Also the parent got the time wrong - affordable i386-based systems did n't really co-exist with TRS-80 - and the price of a Trash - even a Z80-based model would 've definitely been more than you 'd be able to buy with your Xmas cash in Finland those days.interception Osama ICE freedom Abbas COSCO threat morse Comirex AMEMBPeking Defcon DES INS Attorney General</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he had bought a Trash-80, would we all be programming Motorola chips today?Maybe, but it wouldn't be because of the TRS-80, which had a Zilog Z80 CPU.I beg to differ - I've written C on TRS-80 model 16 with XENIX - it had MC68k and Z80 for bootstrap, which was used as I/O co-processor once the 68k system was up, It also had dual 8" floppies, and an 8MB (!!
) hard disk which was larger than a modern desktop PC chassis.Also the parent got the time wrong - affordable i386-based systems didn't really co-exist with TRS-80 - and the price of a Trash - even a Z80-based model would've definitely been more than you'd be able to buy with your Xmas cash in Finland those days.interception Osama ICE freedom Abbas COSCO threat morse Comirex AMEMBPeking Defcon DES INS Attorney General
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572654</id>
	<title>Re:DX or SX?</title>
	<author>Stonent1</author>
	<datestamp>1262023380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The 386SX was a 32 bit processor internally but had a 16 bit data bus. The 386DX was a straight 32bit processor all the way through. There was a third flawed varient that had a problem switching between real and protected mode that could lock up the system.  Those chips would be stamped that they were only certified for 16 bit apps.  The ones that tested good had a double sigma stamp on them. Neither the 386sx nor 386dx had math coprocessors. The 486 however was a different story.  The 486DX had a coprocessor but the 486SX did not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 386SX was a 32 bit processor internally but had a 16 bit data bus .
The 386DX was a straight 32bit processor all the way through .
There was a third flawed varient that had a problem switching between real and protected mode that could lock up the system .
Those chips would be stamped that they were only certified for 16 bit apps .
The ones that tested good had a double sigma stamp on them .
Neither the 386sx nor 386dx had math coprocessors .
The 486 however was a different story .
The 486DX had a coprocessor but the 486SX did not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 386SX was a 32 bit processor internally but had a 16 bit data bus.
The 386DX was a straight 32bit processor all the way through.
There was a third flawed varient that had a problem switching between real and protected mode that could lock up the system.
Those chips would be stamped that they were only certified for 16 bit apps.
The ones that tested good had a double sigma stamp on them.
Neither the 386sx nor 386dx had math coprocessors.
The 486 however was a different story.
The 486DX had a coprocessor but the 486SX did not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576024</id>
	<title>Re:over 40</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261996560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is he going to invent anything else? Or after 40 do you just give up on life?</p></div><p>You have to slow down sometimes. If you milk your life like a cow, you'll never reach 50.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is he going to invent anything else ?
Or after 40 do you just give up on life ? You have to slow down sometimes .
If you milk your life like a cow , you 'll never reach 50 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is he going to invent anything else?
Or after 40 do you just give up on life?You have to slow down sometimes.
If you milk your life like a cow, you'll never reach 50.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573272</id>
	<title>I'm amused by all the HURD references</title>
	<author>afabbro</author>
	<datestamp>1262025960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The open source "competition" to Linux has been *BSD.  If Linux had never existed, we'd all be running *BSD.  End of story, really.  And it would have happened quickly - if memory serves, the only reason Linux took off was because BSD was still in or had just gotten out of the long clusterfrack legal disputes.  If there had been no Linux, *BSD would have picked up its steam, only a year or two later.</p><p>At some point, someone would have married the best parts of GNU with *BSD and you'd have RMS screaming about GNU/BSD.</p><p>HURD, for all practical purposes, has never existed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The open source " competition " to Linux has been * BSD .
If Linux had never existed , we 'd all be running * BSD .
End of story , really .
And it would have happened quickly - if memory serves , the only reason Linux took off was because BSD was still in or had just gotten out of the long clusterfrack legal disputes .
If there had been no Linux , * BSD would have picked up its steam , only a year or two later.At some point , someone would have married the best parts of GNU with * BSD and you 'd have RMS screaming about GNU/BSD.HURD , for all practical purposes , has never existed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The open source "competition" to Linux has been *BSD.
If Linux had never existed, we'd all be running *BSD.
End of story, really.
And it would have happened quickly - if memory serves, the only reason Linux took off was because BSD was still in or had just gotten out of the long clusterfrack legal disputes.
If there had been no Linux, *BSD would have picked up its steam, only a year or two later.At some point, someone would have married the best parts of GNU with *BSD and you'd have RMS screaming about GNU/BSD.HURD, for all practical purposes, has never existed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572732</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't qualify for one-name status</title>
	<author>SpooForBrains</author>
	<datestamp>1262023680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not if you pronounce it correctly they don't.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not if you pronounce it correctly they do n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not if you pronounce it correctly they don't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574448</id>
	<title>Re:Powerful computer</title>
	<author>Amouth</author>
	<datestamp>1262031660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amstrad\_PCW" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amstrad\_PCW</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>we had one of the first ones - i remember having to trouble shoot it once - turns out it couldn't boot unless the printer was attached.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amstrad \ _PCW [ wikipedia.org ] we had one of the first ones - i remember having to trouble shoot it once - turns out it could n't boot unless the printer was attached .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amstrad\_PCW [wikipedia.org]we had one of the first ones - i remember having to trouble shoot it once - turns out it couldn't boot unless the printer was attached.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572784</id>
	<title>Re:386dx, no coprocessor?</title>
	<author>dee.cz</author>
	<datestamp>1262023860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>DX had wider bus, not a coprocessor. Must have been insanely expensive when Linus bought it, I switched to the same setup 16.5 years ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>DX had wider bus , not a coprocessor .
Must have been insanely expensive when Linus bought it , I switched to the same setup 16.5 years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DX had wider bus, not a coprocessor.
Must have been insanely expensive when Linus bought it, I switched to the same setup 16.5 years ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574204</id>
	<title>Re:DX or SX?</title>
	<author>dantum\_sh</author>
	<datestamp>1262030460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm pretty sure DX is the model with coprocessor. The SX were the crippled chips that didn't have coprocessor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure DX is the model with coprocessor .
The SX were the crippled chips that did n't have coprocessor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure DX is the model with coprocessor.
The SX were the crippled chips that didn't have coprocessor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30575786</id>
	<title>How would the world be different?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261995480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, for one thing,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. would not be filled with a bunch of whiny bitches.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , for one thing , / .
would not be filled with a bunch of whiny bitches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, for one thing, /.
would not be filled with a bunch of whiny bitches.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572806</id>
	<title>Big deal.</title>
	<author>jgreco</author>
	<datestamp>1262023920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No Linux?  Big deal.  There are plenty of alternatives.  Perhaps we would have ended up without a GPL-encumbered OS - maybe something like NetBSD or FreeBSD - doing these things.  Nothing to see here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No Linux ?
Big deal .
There are plenty of alternatives .
Perhaps we would have ended up without a GPL-encumbered OS - maybe something like NetBSD or FreeBSD - doing these things .
Nothing to see here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Linux?
Big deal.
There are plenty of alternatives.
Perhaps we would have ended up without a GPL-encumbered OS - maybe something like NetBSD or FreeBSD - doing these things.
Nothing to see here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574126</id>
	<title>Happy Birthday Linus!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262030100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm grateful you spent your money on that 386 back then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm grateful you spent your money on that 386 back then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm grateful you spent your money on that 386 back then.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573730</id>
	<title>Props to Linus</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1262028120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thanks for all the hard work you've done and the world you've helped open! Enjoy your birthday!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for all the hard work you 've done and the world you 've helped open !
Enjoy your birthday !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for all the hard work you've done and the world you've helped open!
Enjoy your birthday!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573530</id>
	<title>Re:We will never know</title>
	<author>Kjella</author>
	<datestamp>1262027280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>While Linus caused an crystallization point for hundreds of developers he did not write the thing alone. these people were already there. More or less waiting for something like this to happen. Most of them were already part of the Minix mailing list. So most likely Linux was already waiting to happen then. From my own time as an undergraduate. all the good programmers wanted to write an OS.</p></div><p>A lot of people are in the wishful thinking brigade of "It would be cool to..." without ever walking the walk, they just like to dream about it. I know it with myself that it's pretty easy to dream up grand projects, something completely different to drive them to practical completion. I'm sure some people would have created a basic OS just to let it fizzle for lack of interest or because of final exams or because they got a job or got a girlfriend or family or didn't really like all the hard real-life problems or didn't cope well QA'ing code submissions as opposed to coding or any one of the million things that leads to dead halfassed projects on sourceforge. Linus wasn't just the spark that set off a community, he's been the one driving the community with massive amounts of code written by him personally and the persistance to drive the project to maturity. There's a lot of people who could have played the supporting roles, but there's few who could have walked in his shoes. I'm not so sure anyone would have.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While Linus caused an crystallization point for hundreds of developers he did not write the thing alone .
these people were already there .
More or less waiting for something like this to happen .
Most of them were already part of the Minix mailing list .
So most likely Linux was already waiting to happen then .
From my own time as an undergraduate .
all the good programmers wanted to write an OS.A lot of people are in the wishful thinking brigade of " It would be cool to... " without ever walking the walk , they just like to dream about it .
I know it with myself that it 's pretty easy to dream up grand projects , something completely different to drive them to practical completion .
I 'm sure some people would have created a basic OS just to let it fizzle for lack of interest or because of final exams or because they got a job or got a girlfriend or family or did n't really like all the hard real-life problems or did n't cope well QA'ing code submissions as opposed to coding or any one of the million things that leads to dead halfassed projects on sourceforge .
Linus was n't just the spark that set off a community , he 's been the one driving the community with massive amounts of code written by him personally and the persistance to drive the project to maturity .
There 's a lot of people who could have played the supporting roles , but there 's few who could have walked in his shoes .
I 'm not so sure anyone would have .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While Linus caused an crystallization point for hundreds of developers he did not write the thing alone.
these people were already there.
More or less waiting for something like this to happen.
Most of them were already part of the Minix mailing list.
So most likely Linux was already waiting to happen then.
From my own time as an undergraduate.
all the good programmers wanted to write an OS.A lot of people are in the wishful thinking brigade of "It would be cool to..." without ever walking the walk, they just like to dream about it.
I know it with myself that it's pretty easy to dream up grand projects, something completely different to drive them to practical completion.
I'm sure some people would have created a basic OS just to let it fizzle for lack of interest or because of final exams or because they got a job or got a girlfriend or family or didn't really like all the hard real-life problems or didn't cope well QA'ing code submissions as opposed to coding or any one of the million things that leads to dead halfassed projects on sourceforge.
Linus wasn't just the spark that set off a community, he's been the one driving the community with massive amounts of code written by him personally and the persistance to drive the project to maturity.
There's a lot of people who could have played the supporting roles, but there's few who could have walked in his shoes.
I'm not so sure anyone would have.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573408</id>
	<title>Re:over 40</title>
	<author>mrjohnson</author>
	<datestamp>1262026560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What about git? It's slowly taking over distributed source control...</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about git ?
It 's slowly taking over distributed source control.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about git?
It's slowly taking over distributed source control...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572886</id>
	<title>Re:no co-proc?</title>
	<author>Jeremy Erwin</author>
	<datestamp>1262024220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>A DX33 had a math co-processor,</i><br>Only if you also installed a 387. Or perhaps a Weitek Abacus 3167.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A DX33 had a math co-processor,Only if you also installed a 387 .
Or perhaps a Weitek Abacus 3167 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A DX33 had a math co-processor,Only if you also installed a 387.
Or perhaps a Weitek Abacus 3167.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572452</id>
	<title>over 40</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262022660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is he going to invent anything else? Or after 40 do you just give up on life?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is he going to invent anything else ?
Or after 40 do you just give up on life ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is he going to invent anything else?
Or after 40 do you just give up on life?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573024</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't qualify for one-name status</title>
	<author>AvitarX</author>
	<datestamp>1262024940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On slashdot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On slashdot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On slashdot?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30577752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30580888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30578998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30581966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30577758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30575444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30581924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30575872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30581734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30577366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30575174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30585128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30575454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_28_1438232_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574044
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572698
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30575444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30581924
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576740
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573332
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572784
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30580888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30577758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572654
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30577752
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572734
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572602
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30581734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572716
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30575454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572742
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573926
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30585128
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573272
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572722
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573400
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573136
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30577366
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572452
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576024
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573408
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574060
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573660
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573354
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576412
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572956
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572518
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572904
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573662
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30575872
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573760
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30581966
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30576142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572512
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30572408
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_28_1438232.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30578998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30575174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30574724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_28_1438232.30573916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
