<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_26_1428206</id>
	<title>Man Tries To Use Explosive Device On US Flight</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1261838280000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>reporter writes with news that a Nigerian man allegedly <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126180624205805587.html?mod=article-outset-box">attempted to set off a small explosive device</a> &mdash; possibly a firecracker &mdash; on a Delta Airbus 330 airliner bound for Detroit yesterday. "There was a pop and then smoke wafted through the cabin. A passenger then climbed over several seats, lunged across the aisle and <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126178158688405369.html?mod=WSJ\_hpp\_LEFTTopStories">managed to subdue the suspect</a>, the eyewitnesses said. The Nigerian man was placed in a headlock before being dragged up to the first class cabin. Passenger Zeina Seagal told CNN that after the suspect was collared and parts of his burning pants were removed, flight attendants quickly grabbed fire extinguishers and doused the fire at his seat." The man has claimed links to al-Qaeda, though the investigation hasn't confirmed that yet. (They're not taking anything for granted given that <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/12/26/airline.attack/index.html">his pants were literally on fire</a>.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>reporter writes with news that a Nigerian man allegedly attempted to set off a small explosive device    possibly a firecracker    on a Delta Airbus 330 airliner bound for Detroit yesterday .
" There was a pop and then smoke wafted through the cabin .
A passenger then climbed over several seats , lunged across the aisle and managed to subdue the suspect , the eyewitnesses said .
The Nigerian man was placed in a headlock before being dragged up to the first class cabin .
Passenger Zeina Seagal told CNN that after the suspect was collared and parts of his burning pants were removed , flight attendants quickly grabbed fire extinguishers and doused the fire at his seat .
" The man has claimed links to al-Qaeda , though the investigation has n't confirmed that yet .
( They 're not taking anything for granted given that his pants were literally on fire .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>reporter writes with news that a Nigerian man allegedly attempted to set off a small explosive device — possibly a firecracker — on a Delta Airbus 330 airliner bound for Detroit yesterday.
"There was a pop and then smoke wafted through the cabin.
A passenger then climbed over several seats, lunged across the aisle and managed to subdue the suspect, the eyewitnesses said.
The Nigerian man was placed in a headlock before being dragged up to the first class cabin.
Passenger Zeina Seagal told CNN that after the suspect was collared and parts of his burning pants were removed, flight attendants quickly grabbed fire extinguishers and doused the fire at his seat.
" The man has claimed links to al-Qaeda, though the investigation hasn't confirmed that yet.
(They're not taking anything for granted given that his pants were literally on fire.
)</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557790</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh</title>
	<author>HiThere</author>
	<datestamp>1261860660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Put the responsibility where it belongs.  This idiot was acting like an idiot, and will suffer.  The idiots who pass additional regulations won't suffer....and they should.</p><p>It's been pointed out that the appropriate response is a strong wall between the flight crew's cabin and the passenger cabin.  And that's just about it.  Yeah, guns on board are a bad idea, and should be prohibited.  No reason to worry about anything minor.  If airlines want to take additional measures, it should be up to THEM, not to the government.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Put the responsibility where it belongs .
This idiot was acting like an idiot , and will suffer .
The idiots who pass additional regulations wo n't suffer....and they should.It 's been pointed out that the appropriate response is a strong wall between the flight crew 's cabin and the passenger cabin .
And that 's just about it .
Yeah , guns on board are a bad idea , and should be prohibited .
No reason to worry about anything minor .
If airlines want to take additional measures , it should be up to THEM , not to the government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Put the responsibility where it belongs.
This idiot was acting like an idiot, and will suffer.
The idiots who pass additional regulations won't suffer....and they should.It's been pointed out that the appropriate response is a strong wall between the flight crew's cabin and the passenger cabin.
And that's just about it.
Yeah, guns on board are a bad idea, and should be prohibited.
No reason to worry about anything minor.
If airlines want to take additional measures, it should be up to THEM, not to the government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558674</id>
	<title>Re:Not a fire cracker</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1261824480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; It wasn't a firecracker. Google "binary explosive"</p><p>Perhaps.  If so, it didn't work, just as everyone who actually knows any chemistry predicted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; It was n't a firecracker .
Google " binary explosive " Perhaps .
If so , it did n't work , just as everyone who actually knows any chemistry predicted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; It wasn't a firecracker.
Google "binary explosive"Perhaps.
If so, it didn't work, just as everyone who actually knows any chemistry predicted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559676</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261833960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you ask one?  Wouldn't he have been dead when you asked him?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you ask one ?
Would n't he have been dead when you asked him ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you ask one?
Wouldn't he have been dead when you asked him?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558490</id>
	<title>Re:Fucking douchebag</title>
	<author>RichM</author>
	<datestamp>1261823100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anal\_probing" title="wikipedia.org">Anal Probing</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anal Probing [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anal Probing [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556070</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Scrameustache</author>
	<datestamp>1261845840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If this was really an al-Qaeda plot - then why did he not succeed in crashing the airplane ? Are you really trying to convince me that they are a bunch of incompetents who just manage to cause a little damage but that is all ?</p></div><p>Al Quaeda does not exist, it's a fiction created by the Intelligence Community to replace the red menace that had ceased to fuel their budgets.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this was really an al-Qaeda plot - then why did he not succeed in crashing the airplane ?
Are you really trying to convince me that they are a bunch of incompetents who just manage to cause a little damage but that is all ? Al Quaeda does not exist , it 's a fiction created by the Intelligence Community to replace the red menace that had ceased to fuel their budgets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this was really an al-Qaeda plot - then why did he not succeed in crashing the airplane ?
Are you really trying to convince me that they are a bunch of incompetents who just manage to cause a little damage but that is all ?Al Quaeda does not exist, it's a fiction created by the Intelligence Community to replace the red menace that had ceased to fuel their budgets.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557280</id>
	<title>That's actually almost true</title>
	<author>Chemisor</author>
	<datestamp>1261856460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, it turns out he really is a <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091226/ap\_on\_re\_us/us\_airliner\_attack" title="yahoo.com">son of a prominent nigerian banker</a> [yahoo.com]. I'm not making this up<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it turns out he really is a son of a prominent nigerian banker [ yahoo.com ] .
I 'm not making this up : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it turns out he really is a son of a prominent nigerian banker [yahoo.com].
I'm not making this up :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558940</id>
	<title>TWA 800</title>
	<author>uarch</author>
	<datestamp>1261826460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All of the recent reports are claiming the "explosive device" contained PETN.<br>For those of you that don't remember, PETN was a component in the bomb that brought down TWA 800, killing all 230 on board.</p><p>"Firecracker" my ass...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All of the recent reports are claiming the " explosive device " contained PETN.For those of you that do n't remember , PETN was a component in the bomb that brought down TWA 800 , killing all 230 on board .
" Firecracker " my ass.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of the recent reports are claiming the "explosive device" contained PETN.For those of you that don't remember, PETN was a component in the bomb that brought down TWA 800, killing all 230 on board.
"Firecracker" my ass...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555668</id>
	<title>Oh great!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261842180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He was coming to the States to deliver my $40,000,000US.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He was coming to the States to deliver my $ 40,000,000US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He was coming to the States to deliver my $40,000,000US.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556502</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261849620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>probably the same reason why all Christians aren't beheaded when entering a Muslim country, just a guess</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>probably the same reason why all Christians are n't beheaded when entering a Muslim country , just a guess</tokentext>
<sentencetext>probably the same reason why all Christians aren't beheaded when entering a Muslim country, just a guess</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556740</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261851840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I for one wouldn't allow them to both fail and die, if possible.  He could have valuable information.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one would n't allow them to both fail and die , if possible .
He could have valuable information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one wouldn't allow them to both fail and die, if possible.
He could have valuable information.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556650</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Deton8</author>
	<datestamp>1261850940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think this refers to binary liquid-liquid explosives.  There are lots of simple explosive mixtures which involve a relatively inert powder such as ammonium nitrate, plus a liquid sensitizer such as nitromethane (used in race car fuel).  All of them that I know of require a blasting cap, which will show up on an x-ray and might trigger a magnetometer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this refers to binary liquid-liquid explosives .
There are lots of simple explosive mixtures which involve a relatively inert powder such as ammonium nitrate , plus a liquid sensitizer such as nitromethane ( used in race car fuel ) .
All of them that I know of require a blasting cap , which will show up on an x-ray and might trigger a magnetometer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this refers to binary liquid-liquid explosives.
There are lots of simple explosive mixtures which involve a relatively inert powder such as ammonium nitrate, plus a liquid sensitizer such as nitromethane (used in race car fuel).
All of them that I know of require a blasting cap, which will show up on an x-ray and might trigger a magnetometer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557404</id>
	<title>What this shows...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261857360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It doesn't matter how many security measures the TSA puts in place in the US. All the terrorists have to do is overcome the weakest link in the chain of countries flying to the US. So unless every country implements the same measures as the US, the TSA measures only serve to annoy the hell out of the passengers. What a waste of money, and what a pain we have to go through.

Also, what's up with the reactive measures?? Can't they come up with these scenarios beforehand? It's not like we're talking about evil geniuses here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't matter how many security measures the TSA puts in place in the US .
All the terrorists have to do is overcome the weakest link in the chain of countries flying to the US .
So unless every country implements the same measures as the US , the TSA measures only serve to annoy the hell out of the passengers .
What a waste of money , and what a pain we have to go through .
Also , what 's up with the reactive measures ? ?
Ca n't they come up with these scenarios beforehand ?
It 's not like we 're talking about evil geniuses here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't matter how many security measures the TSA puts in place in the US.
All the terrorists have to do is overcome the weakest link in the chain of countries flying to the US.
So unless every country implements the same measures as the US, the TSA measures only serve to annoy the hell out of the passengers.
What a waste of money, and what a pain we have to go through.
Also, what's up with the reactive measures??
Can't they come up with these scenarios beforehand?
It's not like we're talking about evil geniuses here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558600</id>
	<title>Time to exterminate Muslims</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261824120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Christians and Atheists get along better than Muslims and ANYONE. Let's eradicate them all now and we'll have a better tomorrow.</p><p>Seriously, these freaks are hellbent on killing us, seems like an act of war to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Christians and Atheists get along better than Muslims and ANYONE .
Let 's eradicate them all now and we 'll have a better tomorrow.Seriously , these freaks are hellbent on killing us , seems like an act of war to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Christians and Atheists get along better than Muslims and ANYONE.
Let's eradicate them all now and we'll have a better tomorrow.Seriously, these freaks are hellbent on killing us, seems like an act of war to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561876</id>
	<title>Security agencies were forewarned about this...</title>
	<author>HigH5</author>
	<datestamp>1261909440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... by the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8431470.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">father of this terrorist</a> [bbc.co.uk]. Nagging ordinary citizens and letting go actual terrorists - what the f**k is going on?</htmltext>
<tokenext>... by the father of this terrorist [ bbc.co.uk ] .
Nagging ordinary citizens and letting go actual terrorists - what the f * * k is going on ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... by the father of this terrorist [bbc.co.uk].
Nagging ordinary citizens and letting go actual terrorists - what the f**k is going on?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559078</id>
	<title>Re:Oh great!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261827600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>liar liar pants on fire!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>liar liar pants on fire !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>liar liar pants on fire!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556674</id>
	<title>Sigh</title>
	<author>ShooterNeo</author>
	<datestamp>1261851120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The sad thing is, these pathetic incompetent terrorists are going to be responsible for causing billions of dollars to spent on extra airport security and many, many lifetimes of time will be wasted in stupid delays.</p><p>Some incompetent terrorists tries to blow up the plane, but can't build a proper electronic detonator that a 10th grader could solder together?  Now we all have to be humiliated by taking our shoes off.</p><p>Some incompetent wanna-be terrorists think about a liquid bomb because they saw it in the movie Die Hard 3?  Now millions of Americans have to buy overpriced beverages and/or die of thirst.  Not to mention that the world's best chemists don't know a reasonable way to make a liquid bomb actually freakin work.</p><p>And now, some useless waste of space terrorist doesn't build a proper bomb using over the counter ingredients like fertilizer/diesel fuel or tannerite.  (both are so easy to get that a 10th grader could order either of those explosives).  No, the idiot tries to blow up an airliner with what sounds like a gunpowder bomb.  And despite only managing to burn his own pants off, undoubtedly some new round of draconian security measures will kill many lifetimes of wasted time at security checkpoints.</p><p>Fact is, the United States has killed far more of it's citizens through reacting to the actions of terrorists than terrorists have ever harmed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The sad thing is , these pathetic incompetent terrorists are going to be responsible for causing billions of dollars to spent on extra airport security and many , many lifetimes of time will be wasted in stupid delays.Some incompetent terrorists tries to blow up the plane , but ca n't build a proper electronic detonator that a 10th grader could solder together ?
Now we all have to be humiliated by taking our shoes off.Some incompetent wan na-be terrorists think about a liquid bomb because they saw it in the movie Die Hard 3 ?
Now millions of Americans have to buy overpriced beverages and/or die of thirst .
Not to mention that the world 's best chemists do n't know a reasonable way to make a liquid bomb actually freakin work.And now , some useless waste of space terrorist does n't build a proper bomb using over the counter ingredients like fertilizer/diesel fuel or tannerite .
( both are so easy to get that a 10th grader could order either of those explosives ) .
No , the idiot tries to blow up an airliner with what sounds like a gunpowder bomb .
And despite only managing to burn his own pants off , undoubtedly some new round of draconian security measures will kill many lifetimes of wasted time at security checkpoints.Fact is , the United States has killed far more of it 's citizens through reacting to the actions of terrorists than terrorists have ever harmed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The sad thing is, these pathetic incompetent terrorists are going to be responsible for causing billions of dollars to spent on extra airport security and many, many lifetimes of time will be wasted in stupid delays.Some incompetent terrorists tries to blow up the plane, but can't build a proper electronic detonator that a 10th grader could solder together?
Now we all have to be humiliated by taking our shoes off.Some incompetent wanna-be terrorists think about a liquid bomb because they saw it in the movie Die Hard 3?
Now millions of Americans have to buy overpriced beverages and/or die of thirst.
Not to mention that the world's best chemists don't know a reasonable way to make a liquid bomb actually freakin work.And now, some useless waste of space terrorist doesn't build a proper bomb using over the counter ingredients like fertilizer/diesel fuel or tannerite.
(both are so easy to get that a 10th grader could order either of those explosives).
No, the idiot tries to blow up an airliner with what sounds like a gunpowder bomb.
And despite only managing to burn his own pants off, undoubtedly some new round of draconian security measures will kill many lifetimes of wasted time at security checkpoints.Fact is, the United States has killed far more of it's citizens through reacting to the actions of terrorists than terrorists have ever harmed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556260</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>wvmarle</author>
	<datestamp>1261847460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who needs success? Plans are enough! Just plans is how we got those silly no-liquids rules. And on top of that a week of highly disrupted air traffic. Terrorism is that easy. I'd almost call it dead easy but in that case no death involved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who needs success ?
Plans are enough !
Just plans is how we got those silly no-liquids rules .
And on top of that a week of highly disrupted air traffic .
Terrorism is that easy .
I 'd almost call it dead easy but in that case no death involved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who needs success?
Plans are enough!
Just plans is how we got those silly no-liquids rules.
And on top of that a week of highly disrupted air traffic.
Terrorism is that easy.
I'd almost call it dead easy but in that case no death involved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560006</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>indiechild</author>
	<datestamp>1261838280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd say from Al-Qaeda's view, they were successful in their mission. The guy didn't have to blow himself up successfully for the whole thing to be a success. In fact I'd say the guy's handlers probably knew there was a close to zero chance of him actually managing to blow himself up. Either way, they've achieved their aim, which is to spread fear and to get the authorities to implement ever-more ridiculous countermeasures in an attempt to stop stuff like this happening.</p><p>So Al-Qaeda wins no matter what, because of the way everyone reacts.</p><p>A lot of these terrorists are basically loner losers for whom life has no meaning anymore. It's just another variation of high school mass shootings. You can interrogate him, but you're unlikely to learn much useful info. You can recruit these kinds of guys practically anywhere in the world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd say from Al-Qaeda 's view , they were successful in their mission .
The guy did n't have to blow himself up successfully for the whole thing to be a success .
In fact I 'd say the guy 's handlers probably knew there was a close to zero chance of him actually managing to blow himself up .
Either way , they 've achieved their aim , which is to spread fear and to get the authorities to implement ever-more ridiculous countermeasures in an attempt to stop stuff like this happening.So Al-Qaeda wins no matter what , because of the way everyone reacts.A lot of these terrorists are basically loner losers for whom life has no meaning anymore .
It 's just another variation of high school mass shootings .
You can interrogate him , but you 're unlikely to learn much useful info .
You can recruit these kinds of guys practically anywhere in the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd say from Al-Qaeda's view, they were successful in their mission.
The guy didn't have to blow himself up successfully for the whole thing to be a success.
In fact I'd say the guy's handlers probably knew there was a close to zero chance of him actually managing to blow himself up.
Either way, they've achieved their aim, which is to spread fear and to get the authorities to implement ever-more ridiculous countermeasures in an attempt to stop stuff like this happening.So Al-Qaeda wins no matter what, because of the way everyone reacts.A lot of these terrorists are basically loner losers for whom life has no meaning anymore.
It's just another variation of high school mass shootings.
You can interrogate him, but you're unlikely to learn much useful info.
You can recruit these kinds of guys practically anywhere in the world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261846980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Binary explosives are a bit hard to mix</p></div><p>That's an understatement.</p><p>The TSA itself has admitted that it is nearly impossible to pull off:</p><p><i>The preparation of these bombs is very much more complex than tossing together several bottles-worth of formula and lighting it up. In fact, in recent tests, a National Lab was asked to formulate a test mixture and it took several tries using the best equipment and best scientists for it to even ignite. That was with a bomb prepared in advance in a lab setting. A less skilled person attempting to put it together inside a secure area or a plane is not a good bet. You have to have significant uninterrupted time with space and other requirements that are not easily available in a secured area of an airport.</i></p><p><a href="http://www.tsa.gov/blog/2008/02/more-on-liquid-rules-why-we-do-things.html" title="tsa.gov">2.04.2008 More on the Liquid Rules: Why We Do the Things We Do</a> [tsa.gov]</p><p>That's right -the TSA has admitted that binary explosives are essentially impossible to pull off, and yet they still insist on on the totally pointless liquid restrictions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Binary explosives are a bit hard to mixThat 's an understatement.The TSA itself has admitted that it is nearly impossible to pull off : The preparation of these bombs is very much more complex than tossing together several bottles-worth of formula and lighting it up .
In fact , in recent tests , a National Lab was asked to formulate a test mixture and it took several tries using the best equipment and best scientists for it to even ignite .
That was with a bomb prepared in advance in a lab setting .
A less skilled person attempting to put it together inside a secure area or a plane is not a good bet .
You have to have significant uninterrupted time with space and other requirements that are not easily available in a secured area of an airport.2.04.2008 More on the Liquid Rules : Why We Do the Things We Do [ tsa.gov ] That 's right -the TSA has admitted that binary explosives are essentially impossible to pull off , and yet they still insist on on the totally pointless liquid restrictions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Binary explosives are a bit hard to mixThat's an understatement.The TSA itself has admitted that it is nearly impossible to pull off:The preparation of these bombs is very much more complex than tossing together several bottles-worth of formula and lighting it up.
In fact, in recent tests, a National Lab was asked to formulate a test mixture and it took several tries using the best equipment and best scientists for it to even ignite.
That was with a bomb prepared in advance in a lab setting.
A less skilled person attempting to put it together inside a secure area or a plane is not a good bet.
You have to have significant uninterrupted time with space and other requirements that are not easily available in a secured area of an airport.2.04.2008 More on the Liquid Rules: Why We Do the Things We Do [tsa.gov]That's right -the TSA has admitted that binary explosives are essentially impossible to pull off, and yet they still insist on on the totally pointless liquid restrictions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556126</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261846320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, that would be preferable to flying coach.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , that would be preferable to flying coach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, that would be preferable to flying coach.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557594</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261859280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stop giving the TSA/DHS ideas, as they obviously have none.</p><p>Really? Nigeria to Amsterdam to U.S.?  He made it all that way w/ fucking firecrackers? This wasn't a failure in the U.S. transportation system, this was a failure 6000 miles earlier.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop giving the TSA/DHS ideas , as they obviously have none.Really ?
Nigeria to Amsterdam to U.S. ?
He made it all that way w/ fucking firecrackers ?
This was n't a failure in the U.S. transportation system , this was a failure 6000 miles earlier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop giving the TSA/DHS ideas, as they obviously have none.Really?
Nigeria to Amsterdam to U.S.?
He made it all that way w/ fucking firecrackers?
This wasn't a failure in the U.S. transportation system, this was a failure 6000 miles earlier.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557428</id>
	<title>Not a fire cracker</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261857540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It wasn't a firecracker.  Google "binary explosive"</p><p>Alternatively, there's a few videos on youtube discussing them.  Here's the first one I came across that shows how to mix the powder &amp; liquid parts:<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fESo6JweU20" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fESo6JweU20</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was n't a firecracker .
Google " binary explosive " Alternatively , there 's a few videos on youtube discussing them .
Here 's the first one I came across that shows how to mix the powder &amp; liquid parts : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = fESo6JweU20 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wasn't a firecracker.
Google "binary explosive"Alternatively, there's a few videos on youtube discussing them.
Here's the first one I came across that shows how to mix the powder &amp; liquid parts:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fESo6JweU20 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555914</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261844400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forced to wear airline clothing, you say? That'd be perfect. Wait until they start having to deal with wet pants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forced to wear airline clothing , you say ?
That 'd be perfect .
Wait until they start having to deal with wet pants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forced to wear airline clothing, you say?
That'd be perfect.
Wait until they start having to deal with wet pants.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557164</id>
	<title>Re:Security Theater</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261855500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Best" of all, security theatre related: tonight on the TV news it was mentioned that this individual's name was on a list of high-risk terror suspects, some kind of watch list I guess, but not on the no-fly list. So this guy was even on the radar of US security services, and he still managed to pull a stunt like this!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Best " of all , security theatre related : tonight on the TV news it was mentioned that this individual 's name was on a list of high-risk terror suspects , some kind of watch list I guess , but not on the no-fly list .
So this guy was even on the radar of US security services , and he still managed to pull a stunt like this !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Best" of all, security theatre related: tonight on the TV news it was mentioned that this individual's name was on a list of high-risk terror suspects, some kind of watch list I guess, but not on the no-fly list.
So this guy was even on the radar of US security services, and he still managed to pull a stunt like this!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556798</id>
	<title>Next TSA move ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1261852320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>... flying while wearing pants will no longer be permitted.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... flying while wearing pants will no longer be permitted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... flying while wearing pants will no longer be permitted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560400</id>
	<title>Darwin Award, maybe?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261844580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read that the explosive went off in the terrorists lap.  There was little info other than reports that the fire burned his legs.  We can only hope he eliminated himself from the gene pool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read that the explosive went off in the terrorists lap .
There was little info other than reports that the fire burned his legs .
We can only hope he eliminated himself from the gene pool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read that the explosive went off in the terrorists lap.
There was little info other than reports that the fire burned his legs.
We can only hope he eliminated himself from the gene pool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556912</id>
	<title>Time to rethink air transportation</title>
	<author>spectro</author>
	<datestamp>1261853100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imho, air transportation has degenerated to a point it doesn't make sense anymore: we build huge airports just to handle the huge airplanes. The bigger the airport, the more time we waste getting there, checking in, taxing around, etc. If you have ever landed in Dallas-Fort Worth you probably expent a good 20 minutes from touch down until the plane reaches its gate.</p><p>Just flew from Denver to Dallas: total flight time is around 90 mins, we took off to the airport at 6:30 am and I got home at 3:30 pm. That is 10 hrs travel time. Just checked google maps and same trip in car would have taken me about 14 hrs.</p><p>Maybe instead of going bigger we should go smaller, redesigning the airplane to be small and easier to fly so almost anybody could own one or even rent it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imho , air transportation has degenerated to a point it does n't make sense anymore : we build huge airports just to handle the huge airplanes .
The bigger the airport , the more time we waste getting there , checking in , taxing around , etc .
If you have ever landed in Dallas-Fort Worth you probably expent a good 20 minutes from touch down until the plane reaches its gate.Just flew from Denver to Dallas : total flight time is around 90 mins , we took off to the airport at 6 : 30 am and I got home at 3 : 30 pm .
That is 10 hrs travel time .
Just checked google maps and same trip in car would have taken me about 14 hrs.Maybe instead of going bigger we should go smaller , redesigning the airplane to be small and easier to fly so almost anybody could own one or even rent it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imho, air transportation has degenerated to a point it doesn't make sense anymore: we build huge airports just to handle the huge airplanes.
The bigger the airport, the more time we waste getting there, checking in, taxing around, etc.
If you have ever landed in Dallas-Fort Worth you probably expent a good 20 minutes from touch down until the plane reaches its gate.Just flew from Denver to Dallas: total flight time is around 90 mins, we took off to the airport at 6:30 am and I got home at 3:30 pm.
That is 10 hrs travel time.
Just checked google maps and same trip in car would have taken me about 14 hrs.Maybe instead of going bigger we should go smaller, redesigning the airplane to be small and easier to fly so almost anybody could own one or even rent it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556042</id>
	<title>This attack was perfectly succesful</title>
	<author>InsurgentGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1261845600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's important to remember that the goal here is not to bring down planes or buildings - it's to create turmoil and terror. Simple actions like this cause millions to billions of dollars of cost to our economy for the investment of a can of lighter fluid and a firecracker. Because of one case of semi-successful action by one clown millions of us will now be subject to ineffective additional screening, more TSA invasions of privacy and general police state tactics, more delays.

I don't have the answer - but I know the ROI from a terrorist perspective is outstanding.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's important to remember that the goal here is not to bring down planes or buildings - it 's to create turmoil and terror .
Simple actions like this cause millions to billions of dollars of cost to our economy for the investment of a can of lighter fluid and a firecracker .
Because of one case of semi-successful action by one clown millions of us will now be subject to ineffective additional screening , more TSA invasions of privacy and general police state tactics , more delays .
I do n't have the answer - but I know the ROI from a terrorist perspective is outstanding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's important to remember that the goal here is not to bring down planes or buildings - it's to create turmoil and terror.
Simple actions like this cause millions to billions of dollars of cost to our economy for the investment of a can of lighter fluid and a firecracker.
Because of one case of semi-successful action by one clown millions of us will now be subject to ineffective additional screening, more TSA invasions of privacy and general police state tactics, more delays.
I don't have the answer - but I know the ROI from a terrorist perspective is outstanding.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558658</id>
	<title>So the shoe bomber's upstaged by the pants bomber?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1261824360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or is he the trouser terrorist?  How soon will TSA start requiring you to remove your trousers before you can board your flight?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or is he the trouser terrorist ?
How soon will TSA start requiring you to remove your trousers before you can board your flight ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or is he the trouser terrorist?
How soon will TSA start requiring you to remove your trousers before you can board your flight?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558720</id>
	<title>"...spectacularly...."</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1261824780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would have chosen a different word...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would have chosen a different word.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would have chosen a different word...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556530</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>cheesybagel</author>
	<datestamp>1261849860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jews aren't supposed to eat bacon either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jews are n't supposed to eat bacon either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jews aren't supposed to eat bacon either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556722</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>TheGratefulNet</author>
	<datestamp>1261851600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Smart people don't tend to try and blow themselves up.</i></p><p>right.</p><p>our 'smart people' see bearded sky wizards and think that people can be killed and then return to life 3 days later.  and that even in the face of horrible world-level wars, they still think there's a way to come back from the dead becase...</p><p>GOD LOVES US!</p><p>people, we have no right to talk about idiot who blow themselves up.  america is JUST as fundamentalist as 'they' are.   we're morans too and we ruin lives in other ways (indirect violence, is one).</p><p>I do prefer our insanity to 'theirs' but lets not throw stones here.  we're FAR from 'smart'.  america == jesusland and that's something I'm pretty ashamed of, as an american citizen.</p><p>finally, we, as the west, have LET the terr-a-wrists(tm) fuck us over.  in fact, they simply started the job; we have taken over the role and are now crushing our own citizens' privacy, freedom and liberty.  much more effective to destroy ourselves in fear than to have 'them' to it for us.</p><p>we are the morans, my friend.  everyone sees it, too<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Smart people do n't tend to try and blow themselves up.right.our 'smart people ' see bearded sky wizards and think that people can be killed and then return to life 3 days later .
and that even in the face of horrible world-level wars , they still think there 's a way to come back from the dead becase...GOD LOVES US ! people , we have no right to talk about idiot who blow themselves up .
america is JUST as fundamentalist as 'they ' are .
we 're morans too and we ruin lives in other ways ( indirect violence , is one ) .I do prefer our insanity to 'theirs ' but lets not throw stones here .
we 're FAR from 'smart' .
america = = jesusland and that 's something I 'm pretty ashamed of , as an american citizen.finally , we , as the west , have LET the terr-a-wrists ( tm ) fuck us over .
in fact , they simply started the job ; we have taken over the role and are now crushing our own citizens ' privacy , freedom and liberty .
much more effective to destroy ourselves in fear than to have 'them ' to it for us.we are the morans , my friend .
everyone sees it , too ; (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Smart people don't tend to try and blow themselves up.right.our 'smart people' see bearded sky wizards and think that people can be killed and then return to life 3 days later.
and that even in the face of horrible world-level wars, they still think there's a way to come back from the dead becase...GOD LOVES US!people, we have no right to talk about idiot who blow themselves up.
america is JUST as fundamentalist as 'they' are.
we're morans too and we ruin lives in other ways (indirect violence, is one).I do prefer our insanity to 'theirs' but lets not throw stones here.
we're FAR from 'smart'.
america == jesusland and that's something I'm pretty ashamed of, as an american citizen.finally, we, as the west, have LET the terr-a-wrists(tm) fuck us over.
in fact, they simply started the job; we have taken over the role and are now crushing our own citizens' privacy, freedom and liberty.
much more effective to destroy ourselves in fear than to have 'them' to it for us.we are the morans, my friend.
everyone sees it, too ;(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558098</id>
	<title>Re:"possibly a firecracker"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261819860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fire extinguishers wouldn't have put out thermite.  It would have burned *through* his legs, through the seat, possibly through the floor (depending on amount and mix ratio), and into the cargo compartment, below.  Also, it takes a fair amount of heat [well beyond just ambient/body temp - we're talking blow-torch/burning magnesium/&amp;c. temps] to get a thermite reaction going, even with accelerants (e.g. KMnO4, BO4, &amp;c.) thrown into the mix.</p><p>Also, the amount of metal involved would *definitely* set off the detectors on boarding...  The foil in my cigarette packs sets them off, and thermite is basically just powdered iron oxide and aluminum (usually mixed in with accelerants as mentioned above).</p><p>So I don't think it was thermite.  Lots of other possibilities, but not thermite.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fire extinguishers would n't have put out thermite .
It would have burned * through * his legs , through the seat , possibly through the floor ( depending on amount and mix ratio ) , and into the cargo compartment , below .
Also , it takes a fair amount of heat [ well beyond just ambient/body temp - we 're talking blow-torch/burning magnesium/&amp;c .
temps ] to get a thermite reaction going , even with accelerants ( e.g .
KMnO4 , BO4 , &amp;c. ) thrown into the mix.Also , the amount of metal involved would * definitely * set off the detectors on boarding... The foil in my cigarette packs sets them off , and thermite is basically just powdered iron oxide and aluminum ( usually mixed in with accelerants as mentioned above ) .So I do n't think it was thermite .
Lots of other possibilities , but not thermite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fire extinguishers wouldn't have put out thermite.
It would have burned *through* his legs, through the seat, possibly through the floor (depending on amount and mix ratio), and into the cargo compartment, below.
Also, it takes a fair amount of heat [well beyond just ambient/body temp - we're talking blow-torch/burning magnesium/&amp;c.
temps] to get a thermite reaction going, even with accelerants (e.g.
KMnO4, BO4, &amp;c.) thrown into the mix.Also, the amount of metal involved would *definitely* set off the detectors on boarding...  The foil in my cigarette packs sets them off, and thermite is basically just powdered iron oxide and aluminum (usually mixed in with accelerants as mentioned above).So I don't think it was thermite.
Lots of other possibilities, but not thermite.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556222</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261847280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Into a coma? Where do I have to sign? No more annoying kids, awful food nor uncomfortable seats!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Into a coma ?
Where do I have to sign ?
No more annoying kids , awful food nor uncomfortable seats !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Into a coma?
Where do I have to sign?
No more annoying kids, awful food nor uncomfortable seats!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556416</id>
	<title>Re:Probable Translation</title>
	<author>squiggleslash</author>
	<datestamp>1261848900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Terrorism is a matter of motive. If you're trying to seriously terrorize a people for political, ideological, or religious reasons, and you're not doing so on behalf of a government, then you're engaging in terrorism, however stupid your methods or the degree to which you're a personal failure.
</p><p>
If you're just trying to terrorize people because you're a sociopath, or else you're not putting anyone under any serious direct threat (ie "If you're gay, you'll burn in hell", "The south will rise again"), then you're not a terrorist, just a run-of-the-mill jackass.
</p><p>
This guy (a) made it clear that his motives were ideological (by invoking Al Qaeda, even if there's a question of whether such a group exists in any real form, as opposed to being a western umbrella term for terrorist groups helped by Osama Bin Laden and Dick Cheney), and (b) actually tried to kill a bunch of people. Therefore, Burning Leg Man is a terrorist, a stupid one no doubt, but as much of one as the Shoe Bomber.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Terrorism is a matter of motive .
If you 're trying to seriously terrorize a people for political , ideological , or religious reasons , and you 're not doing so on behalf of a government , then you 're engaging in terrorism , however stupid your methods or the degree to which you 're a personal failure .
If you 're just trying to terrorize people because you 're a sociopath , or else you 're not putting anyone under any serious direct threat ( ie " If you 're gay , you 'll burn in hell " , " The south will rise again " ) , then you 're not a terrorist , just a run-of-the-mill jackass .
This guy ( a ) made it clear that his motives were ideological ( by invoking Al Qaeda , even if there 's a question of whether such a group exists in any real form , as opposed to being a western umbrella term for terrorist groups helped by Osama Bin Laden and Dick Cheney ) , and ( b ) actually tried to kill a bunch of people .
Therefore , Burning Leg Man is a terrorist , a stupid one no doubt , but as much of one as the Shoe Bomber .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Terrorism is a matter of motive.
If you're trying to seriously terrorize a people for political, ideological, or religious reasons, and you're not doing so on behalf of a government, then you're engaging in terrorism, however stupid your methods or the degree to which you're a personal failure.
If you're just trying to terrorize people because you're a sociopath, or else you're not putting anyone under any serious direct threat (ie "If you're gay, you'll burn in hell", "The south will rise again"), then you're not a terrorist, just a run-of-the-mill jackass.
This guy (a) made it clear that his motives were ideological (by invoking Al Qaeda, even if there's a question of whether such a group exists in any real form, as opposed to being a western umbrella term for terrorist groups helped by Osama Bin Laden and Dick Cheney), and (b) actually tried to kill a bunch of people.
Therefore, Burning Leg Man is a terrorist, a stupid one no doubt, but as much of one as the Shoe Bomber.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557092</id>
	<title>Amazing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261854780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That in the wake of a possible plane bombing, every single post thus far is concerned with personal convenience while at the airport.</p><p>Me, me, me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That in the wake of a possible plane bombing , every single post thus far is concerned with personal convenience while at the airport.Me , me , me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That in the wake of a possible plane bombing, every single post thus far is concerned with personal convenience while at the airport.Me, me, me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557362</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1261857060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uhm, you don't need "binary" anything to pull that one off - just a highly flammable liquid or thermite.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uhm , you do n't need " binary " anything to pull that one off - just a highly flammable liquid or thermite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uhm, you don't need "binary" anything to pull that one off - just a highly flammable liquid or thermite.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559286</id>
	<title>Re:Security Theater</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261829700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, of course. Because, the TSA being an arm of the United States Government, certainly was in control of the screening process when the plane left from Amsterdam. In the Netherlands. Because, you know, the security of airplanes departing from every single airport in the world is in the hands of the fearsome TSA, which has now gone beyond the bounds of the United States government and is the secret police force of the Illuminati and true world government.</p><p>Obviously.</p><p>And had the terrorist succeeded, the passengers could never have fought back. Unless maybe Samuel L. Jackson was on the plane. He can move about in a cabin experiencing explosive decompression, as seen in Snakes on a Plane.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , of course .
Because , the TSA being an arm of the United States Government , certainly was in control of the screening process when the plane left from Amsterdam .
In the Netherlands .
Because , you know , the security of airplanes departing from every single airport in the world is in the hands of the fearsome TSA , which has now gone beyond the bounds of the United States government and is the secret police force of the Illuminati and true world government.Obviously.And had the terrorist succeeded , the passengers could never have fought back .
Unless maybe Samuel L. Jackson was on the plane .
He can move about in a cabin experiencing explosive decompression , as seen in Snakes on a Plane .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, of course.
Because, the TSA being an arm of the United States Government, certainly was in control of the screening process when the plane left from Amsterdam.
In the Netherlands.
Because, you know, the security of airplanes departing from every single airport in the world is in the hands of the fearsome TSA, which has now gone beyond the bounds of the United States government and is the secret police force of the Illuminati and true world government.Obviously.And had the terrorist succeeded, the passengers could never have fought back.
Unless maybe Samuel L. Jackson was on the plane.
He can move about in a cabin experiencing explosive decompression, as seen in Snakes on a Plane.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556246</id>
	<title>Re:The message is clear</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261847400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So...how come it was, apparently, a Dutchman who subdued him? (after jumping over few rows of seats)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So...how come it was , apparently , a Dutchman who subdued him ?
( after jumping over few rows of seats )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So...how come it was, apparently, a Dutchman who subdued him?
(after jumping over few rows of seats)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555818</id>
	<title>I'm just waiting...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261843680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait until a bomber is caught with a bomb up his ass.</p><p>You thought airport screening was bad before?</p><p>"Drop your pants and bend over!"<br>"Cough please!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait until a bomber is caught with a bomb up his ass.You thought airport screening was bad before ?
" Drop your pants and bend over !
" " Cough please !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait until a bomber is caught with a bomb up his ass.You thought airport screening was bad before?
"Drop your pants and bend over!
""Cough please!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557372</id>
	<title>Dick Cheney</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1261857180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how quickly Dick Cheney will come forward, lambasting the current administration for their lax attitude against terrorists, foaming at the mouth about how much safer the world was, when waterboarding was a fact of life<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how quickly Dick Cheney will come forward , lambasting the current administration for their lax attitude against terrorists , foaming at the mouth about how much safer the world was , when waterboarding was a fact of life .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how quickly Dick Cheney will come forward, lambasting the current administration for their lax attitude against terrorists, foaming at the mouth about how much safer the world was, when waterboarding was a fact of life ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558352</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>kalidasa</author>
	<datestamp>1261821900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One problem that al Qaeda has is that their most operationally successful teams don't survive to strike again. If we weren't doing such a bang up job of recruiting for them, they'd already be washed up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One problem that al Qaeda has is that their most operationally successful teams do n't survive to strike again .
If we were n't doing such a bang up job of recruiting for them , they 'd already be washed up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One problem that al Qaeda has is that their most operationally successful teams don't survive to strike again.
If we weren't doing such a bang up job of recruiting for them, they'd already be washed up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>dlt074</author>
	<datestamp>1261844220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>seriously? just because it wasn't successful by your standards you are ruling out Al-Qaeda? they are not perfect. they fail just like everyone else. they do however learn very fast from their mistakes and try again. there is no reason to believe this wasn't them just because it wasn't successful in bringing down the plane. it was successful in showing them how to get certain components onboard. it was successful in showing how to assemble them onboard. it was successful in showing how we react to their new plan. i'm sure it was successful in accomplishing any number of their objectives. sometimes they just send people out to test reactions and responses to attempted attacks. not all actions are full on real attacks, sometimes they are just testing our lines.</p><p>i'm not saying that is was for sure Al-Qaeda, but i'm not stupid enough to rule them out just because it didn't fit my idea of what a successful Al-Qaeda attack should be. they only have to be successful in bringing down the plane once, we have to be successful in stopping them every time.</p><p>what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE. i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>seriously ?
just because it was n't successful by your standards you are ruling out Al-Qaeda ?
they are not perfect .
they fail just like everyone else .
they do however learn very fast from their mistakes and try again .
there is no reason to believe this was n't them just because it was n't successful in bringing down the plane .
it was successful in showing them how to get certain components onboard .
it was successful in showing how to assemble them onboard .
it was successful in showing how we react to their new plan .
i 'm sure it was successful in accomplishing any number of their objectives .
sometimes they just send people out to test reactions and responses to attempted attacks .
not all actions are full on real attacks , sometimes they are just testing our lines.i 'm not saying that is was for sure Al-Qaeda , but i 'm not stupid enough to rule them out just because it did n't fit my idea of what a successful Al-Qaeda attack should be .
they only have to be successful in bringing down the plane once , we have to be successful in stopping them every time.what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE .
i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>seriously?
just because it wasn't successful by your standards you are ruling out Al-Qaeda?
they are not perfect.
they fail just like everyone else.
they do however learn very fast from their mistakes and try again.
there is no reason to believe this wasn't them just because it wasn't successful in bringing down the plane.
it was successful in showing them how to get certain components onboard.
it was successful in showing how to assemble them onboard.
it was successful in showing how we react to their new plan.
i'm sure it was successful in accomplishing any number of their objectives.
sometimes they just send people out to test reactions and responses to attempted attacks.
not all actions are full on real attacks, sometimes they are just testing our lines.i'm not saying that is was for sure Al-Qaeda, but i'm not stupid enough to rule them out just because it didn't fit my idea of what a successful Al-Qaeda attack should be.
they only have to be successful in bringing down the plane once, we have to be successful in stopping them every time.what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE.
i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559584</id>
	<title>Shoe bomber redux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261832580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, first we had the shoe bomber. Now, we have the butt bomber... X-) The question now is, what will the TSA do to make our traveling experience more interesting in light of this?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , first we had the shoe bomber .
Now , we have the butt bomber... X- ) The question now is , what will the TSA do to make our traveling experience more interesting in light of this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, first we had the shoe bomber.
Now, we have the butt bomber... X-) The question now is, what will the TSA do to make our traveling experience more interesting in light of this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555814</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>ErikZ</author>
	<datestamp>1261843620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you noticed a pattern to most Terrorism attempts? They tend to fail.</p><p>The plot that hit the USS Cole started with a boat so loaded with explosives that it sank before it reached an American warship.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you noticed a pattern to most Terrorism attempts ?
They tend to fail.The plot that hit the USS Cole started with a boat so loaded with explosives that it sank before it reached an American warship .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you noticed a pattern to most Terrorism attempts?
They tend to fail.The plot that hit the USS Cole started with a boat so loaded with explosives that it sank before it reached an American warship.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561992</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261910580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>That's right -the TSA has admitted that binary explosives are essentially impossible to pull off, and yet they still insist on on the totally pointless liquid restrictions.</i></p><p>You appear to be assuming that the restrictions are targeting binary explosives. They aren't.</p><p>Liquids were restricted after the 2006 transatlantic plot. Conspiracy nuts on the Internet invented a straw man argument: it is hard to mix TATP on board, therefore the plot is another NWO reptilian humanoid conspiracy. This was due to a misunderstanding of the statement "the explosive was to be assembled on board". In reality, chemical assembly was not involved, but rather attaching a detonator to a bottle of pre-mixed liquid explosive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's right -the TSA has admitted that binary explosives are essentially impossible to pull off , and yet they still insist on on the totally pointless liquid restrictions.You appear to be assuming that the restrictions are targeting binary explosives .
They are n't.Liquids were restricted after the 2006 transatlantic plot .
Conspiracy nuts on the Internet invented a straw man argument : it is hard to mix TATP on board , therefore the plot is another NWO reptilian humanoid conspiracy .
This was due to a misunderstanding of the statement " the explosive was to be assembled on board " .
In reality , chemical assembly was not involved , but rather attaching a detonator to a bottle of pre-mixed liquid explosive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's right -the TSA has admitted that binary explosives are essentially impossible to pull off, and yet they still insist on on the totally pointless liquid restrictions.You appear to be assuming that the restrictions are targeting binary explosives.
They aren't.Liquids were restricted after the 2006 transatlantic plot.
Conspiracy nuts on the Internet invented a straw man argument: it is hard to mix TATP on board, therefore the plot is another NWO reptilian humanoid conspiracy.
This was due to a misunderstanding of the statement "the explosive was to be assembled on board".
In reality, chemical assembly was not involved, but rather attaching a detonator to a bottle of pre-mixed liquid explosive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556256</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1261847460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't really believe this is al queada. It is just that it is a label that people will believe and now this little guy is going to be treated as a Big Man.  We see this often with the kids in the US, such as the columbine guys, the guy who bombed the Atlanta Olympics, the spokesperson for Focus on the Family that molested children.  They all were little people who wanted to be taken seriously.
<p>
The thing is in those cases we don't automatically see them as a condemnation on everything they say or we infer them to say they represent.  The Columbine incident did not shut down the militia movement. The Army of god is still free to use violence to protect their version of christianity. Focus on the family is still free exposed kids to intimidation and pornography,and evidently sometimes hire adults who like to have sex with those children, to save the unborn kids.  But a fire cracker in a plane, we are all peeing out pants and saying we should strip search every muslim.
</p><p>
I am not saying that we should not take seriously terrorist events.  I am saying that the world is a dangerous place and if we continue to let the hate mongers intimidate us so that at any tiny event we throw out the constitutions, then we are fucked.  Those rights were pretty hard to get.  The elite at the formation of the United states were so set against given the dirty masses any rights that the only way to get them in was as amendments. Think about that, and then think if those with rights ever really want to share them.  No, because we all know the more who have rights, such as a right to health, the harder those rights, or entitlements, are to provide.
</p><p>
I have a right to free travel. We are not in a country we our right to travel is impeded. Although we have to show papers to travel, just like the communists, and some people even with papers cannot travel, and the reason is hidden, just like the communists, most of us do not have travel that is significantly impeded. I think that the elite would be very happy if they use this even to impede the right to travel just a little.
</p><p>
I happen to think the freedom to travel is an entitlement, so if there is a risk of a plane bomb every once is a great while, and if there is a risk that I might be on it, then so be it. I simply don't think we should live in a country where low level bureaucrats can get their jollies by looking at the outline of naked people on the airport scanner.It seems like wars were fought to protect us from that kind personal invasion of privacy by the government.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't really believe this is al queada .
It is just that it is a label that people will believe and now this little guy is going to be treated as a Big Man .
We see this often with the kids in the US , such as the columbine guys , the guy who bombed the Atlanta Olympics , the spokesperson for Focus on the Family that molested children .
They all were little people who wanted to be taken seriously .
The thing is in those cases we do n't automatically see them as a condemnation on everything they say or we infer them to say they represent .
The Columbine incident did not shut down the militia movement .
The Army of god is still free to use violence to protect their version of christianity .
Focus on the family is still free exposed kids to intimidation and pornography,and evidently sometimes hire adults who like to have sex with those children , to save the unborn kids .
But a fire cracker in a plane , we are all peeing out pants and saying we should strip search every muslim .
I am not saying that we should not take seriously terrorist events .
I am saying that the world is a dangerous place and if we continue to let the hate mongers intimidate us so that at any tiny event we throw out the constitutions , then we are fucked .
Those rights were pretty hard to get .
The elite at the formation of the United states were so set against given the dirty masses any rights that the only way to get them in was as amendments .
Think about that , and then think if those with rights ever really want to share them .
No , because we all know the more who have rights , such as a right to health , the harder those rights , or entitlements , are to provide .
I have a right to free travel .
We are not in a country we our right to travel is impeded .
Although we have to show papers to travel , just like the communists , and some people even with papers can not travel , and the reason is hidden , just like the communists , most of us do not have travel that is significantly impeded .
I think that the elite would be very happy if they use this even to impede the right to travel just a little .
I happen to think the freedom to travel is an entitlement , so if there is a risk of a plane bomb every once is a great while , and if there is a risk that I might be on it , then so be it .
I simply do n't think we should live in a country where low level bureaucrats can get their jollies by looking at the outline of naked people on the airport scanner.It seems like wars were fought to protect us from that kind personal invasion of privacy by the government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't really believe this is al queada.
It is just that it is a label that people will believe and now this little guy is going to be treated as a Big Man.
We see this often with the kids in the US, such as the columbine guys, the guy who bombed the Atlanta Olympics, the spokesperson for Focus on the Family that molested children.
They all were little people who wanted to be taken seriously.
The thing is in those cases we don't automatically see them as a condemnation on everything they say or we infer them to say they represent.
The Columbine incident did not shut down the militia movement.
The Army of god is still free to use violence to protect their version of christianity.
Focus on the family is still free exposed kids to intimidation and pornography,and evidently sometimes hire adults who like to have sex with those children, to save the unborn kids.
But a fire cracker in a plane, we are all peeing out pants and saying we should strip search every muslim.
I am not saying that we should not take seriously terrorist events.
I am saying that the world is a dangerous place and if we continue to let the hate mongers intimidate us so that at any tiny event we throw out the constitutions, then we are fucked.
Those rights were pretty hard to get.
The elite at the formation of the United states were so set against given the dirty masses any rights that the only way to get them in was as amendments.
Think about that, and then think if those with rights ever really want to share them.
No, because we all know the more who have rights, such as a right to health, the harder those rights, or entitlements, are to provide.
I have a right to free travel.
We are not in a country we our right to travel is impeded.
Although we have to show papers to travel, just like the communists, and some people even with papers cannot travel, and the reason is hidden, just like the communists, most of us do not have travel that is significantly impeded.
I think that the elite would be very happy if they use this even to impede the right to travel just a little.
I happen to think the freedom to travel is an entitlement, so if there is a risk of a plane bomb every once is a great while, and if there is a risk that I might be on it, then so be it.
I simply don't think we should live in a country where low level bureaucrats can get their jollies by looking at the outline of naked people on the airport scanner.It seems like wars were fought to protect us from that kind personal invasion of privacy by the government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556756</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261852020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stops all the Mormon terrorists too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stops all the Mormon terrorists too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stops all the Mormon terrorists too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556278</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful</title>
	<author>Sparky McGruff</author>
	<datestamp>1261847640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Add in sitting in Houston for 16 hours for "mechanical problems" on the connecting flight, and lose my luggage, and you've got a deal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Add in sitting in Houston for 16 hours for " mechanical problems " on the connecting flight , and lose my luggage , and you 've got a deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Add in sitting in Houston for 16 hours for "mechanical problems" on the connecting flight, and lose my luggage, and you've got a deal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558684</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261824540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are missing the ball on this, the binary explosive is the cover story for the added "no liquids" security measures. Anyone with any knowledge of this type of stuff knows it is impossible, but people kept pressuring TSA so they finally had to admit it was impossible. (Thus risking the effectiveness of their cover story.) The cover story is golden for the general public. There are many kinds of liquids and "binary" makes it sound high-tech and more plausible. It could easily be one of those email chain letter stories that get sent around to scare people, i.e., a common situation with danger lurking in the shadows. When people think terrorism, they think explosives.</p><p>Now the real reason for the ban: dangerous chemicals and substances are best used as liquids, not as solids. And a significant amount could be easily carried on a plane. No ignition of the materials may even be necessary, but if ignited would add more to the panic and could help with dispersal. And they may not even need to be mixed. However the right few chemicals, pre-measured into different sized containers carried by a few passengers and you could poison by aerosol everyone but the pilots. You could also spray caustic chemicals and acids on passengers. People are in tight quarters, it would be easy. Now imagine that such a plane makes an emergency landing with 98\% of the passengers dead or dying, Hazmat teams have to try to extract the survivors. "DEATH PLANE" without a bomb. The plane didn't blow up or crash and everyone still died. A new paradigm for airline terror, but not for the Japanese subway system. The x-rays and metal detectors can't find the bad liquids, hence no liquids. The terrorists probably already know all this stuff, but TSA wants to keep wannabe's and the mentally unstable from trying any variations of this. No liquids is a good policy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are missing the ball on this , the binary explosive is the cover story for the added " no liquids " security measures .
Anyone with any knowledge of this type of stuff knows it is impossible , but people kept pressuring TSA so they finally had to admit it was impossible .
( Thus risking the effectiveness of their cover story .
) The cover story is golden for the general public .
There are many kinds of liquids and " binary " makes it sound high-tech and more plausible .
It could easily be one of those email chain letter stories that get sent around to scare people , i.e. , a common situation with danger lurking in the shadows .
When people think terrorism , they think explosives.Now the real reason for the ban : dangerous chemicals and substances are best used as liquids , not as solids .
And a significant amount could be easily carried on a plane .
No ignition of the materials may even be necessary , but if ignited would add more to the panic and could help with dispersal .
And they may not even need to be mixed .
However the right few chemicals , pre-measured into different sized containers carried by a few passengers and you could poison by aerosol everyone but the pilots .
You could also spray caustic chemicals and acids on passengers .
People are in tight quarters , it would be easy .
Now imagine that such a plane makes an emergency landing with 98 \ % of the passengers dead or dying , Hazmat teams have to try to extract the survivors .
" DEATH PLANE " without a bomb .
The plane did n't blow up or crash and everyone still died .
A new paradigm for airline terror , but not for the Japanese subway system .
The x-rays and metal detectors ca n't find the bad liquids , hence no liquids .
The terrorists probably already know all this stuff , but TSA wants to keep wannabe 's and the mentally unstable from trying any variations of this .
No liquids is a good policy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are missing the ball on this, the binary explosive is the cover story for the added "no liquids" security measures.
Anyone with any knowledge of this type of stuff knows it is impossible, but people kept pressuring TSA so they finally had to admit it was impossible.
(Thus risking the effectiveness of their cover story.
) The cover story is golden for the general public.
There are many kinds of liquids and "binary" makes it sound high-tech and more plausible.
It could easily be one of those email chain letter stories that get sent around to scare people, i.e., a common situation with danger lurking in the shadows.
When people think terrorism, they think explosives.Now the real reason for the ban: dangerous chemicals and substances are best used as liquids, not as solids.
And a significant amount could be easily carried on a plane.
No ignition of the materials may even be necessary, but if ignited would add more to the panic and could help with dispersal.
And they may not even need to be mixed.
However the right few chemicals, pre-measured into different sized containers carried by a few passengers and you could poison by aerosol everyone but the pilots.
You could also spray caustic chemicals and acids on passengers.
People are in tight quarters, it would be easy.
Now imagine that such a plane makes an emergency landing with 98\% of the passengers dead or dying, Hazmat teams have to try to extract the survivors.
"DEATH PLANE" without a bomb.
The plane didn't blow up or crash and everyone still died.
A new paradigm for airline terror, but not for the Japanese subway system.
The x-rays and metal detectors can't find the bad liquids, hence no liquids.
The terrorists probably already know all this stuff, but TSA wants to keep wannabe's and the mentally unstable from trying any variations of this.
No liquids is a good policy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556252</id>
	<title>Re:Not news for nerds.</title>
	<author>lukas84</author>
	<datestamp>1261847460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bombs are technology.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bombs are technology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bombs are technology.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561250</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>michaelhood</author>
	<datestamp>1261857420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I also think all American's (from the US) should be strip searched and left to wander around the Scandinavian winter cold a few hours just to make sure they didn't bring any Big Macs with them.</p><p>Fair is fair, no?</p></div><p>As soon as American visitors start killing your innocents with hamburgers, yup.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I also think all American 's ( from the US ) should be strip searched and left to wander around the Scandinavian winter cold a few hours just to make sure they did n't bring any Big Macs with them.Fair is fair , no ? As soon as American visitors start killing your innocents with hamburgers , yup .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also think all American's (from the US) should be strip searched and left to wander around the Scandinavian winter cold a few hours just to make sure they didn't bring any Big Macs with them.Fair is fair, no?As soon as American visitors start killing your innocents with hamburgers, yup.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555824</id>
	<title>Fireworks?</title>
	<author>BarryNorton</author>
	<datestamp>1261843740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Earlier the article in the (UK) Daily Telegraph had a headline about his having let of a firework.

This contrasted with CNN quoting some US senator saying it was a 'quite sophisticated explosive device'.

The more I hear 'pop and fizz' the more credit I give The Telegraph for being on the money... except that they seem to have retracted it now (?)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Earlier the article in the ( UK ) Daily Telegraph had a headline about his having let of a firework .
This contrasted with CNN quoting some US senator saying it was a 'quite sophisticated explosive device' .
The more I hear 'pop and fizz ' the more credit I give The Telegraph for being on the money... except that they seem to have retracted it now ( ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Earlier the article in the (UK) Daily Telegraph had a headline about his having let of a firework.
This contrasted with CNN quoting some US senator saying it was a 'quite sophisticated explosive device'.
The more I hear 'pop and fizz' the more credit I give The Telegraph for being on the money... except that they seem to have retracted it now (?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557496</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261858200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have an update in the dutch newspaper that said that this guy wasnt linked to al qaida and wasnt on any no-fly lists. Apparantly its the son of some former nigerian minister (70) who's religious ideas became more extreme. He studied in London but apparantly also had an american greencard or so. London police has been searching through several houses after the attack.</p><p>Well, that doesnt say much about how he was able to transport explosive materials. Schiphol (airport) says they handled correctly and that its hard to find everything explosive or something like that.</p><p>What really ticks me off about this stuff is that all airports in the world became more alert and put up alot more security. Its stupid. The attempt by some lone soul has been done, nothing major is going to happen any time soon. Someone flips out like people do everyday and everyone goes into some kind of frenzy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an update in the dutch newspaper that said that this guy wasnt linked to al qaida and wasnt on any no-fly lists .
Apparantly its the son of some former nigerian minister ( 70 ) who 's religious ideas became more extreme .
He studied in London but apparantly also had an american greencard or so .
London police has been searching through several houses after the attack.Well , that doesnt say much about how he was able to transport explosive materials .
Schiphol ( airport ) says they handled correctly and that its hard to find everything explosive or something like that.What really ticks me off about this stuff is that all airports in the world became more alert and put up alot more security .
Its stupid .
The attempt by some lone soul has been done , nothing major is going to happen any time soon .
Someone flips out like people do everyday and everyone goes into some kind of frenzy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an update in the dutch newspaper that said that this guy wasnt linked to al qaida and wasnt on any no-fly lists.
Apparantly its the son of some former nigerian minister (70) who's religious ideas became more extreme.
He studied in London but apparantly also had an american greencard or so.
London police has been searching through several houses after the attack.Well, that doesnt say much about how he was able to transport explosive materials.
Schiphol (airport) says they handled correctly and that its hard to find everything explosive or something like that.What really ticks me off about this stuff is that all airports in the world became more alert and put up alot more security.
Its stupid.
The attempt by some lone soul has been done, nothing major is going to happen any time soon.
Someone flips out like people do everyday and everyone goes into some kind of frenzy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556448</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>tomhath</author>
	<datestamp>1261849200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The perpetrator is claiming he received the explosives from Al-Qaeda in Jemen. He did visit Jemen before boarding this flight, so that is quite likely the source.</p></div><p>But don't ignore the "liar, liar, pants on fire" scenario.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The perpetrator is claiming he received the explosives from Al-Qaeda in Jemen .
He did visit Jemen before boarding this flight , so that is quite likely the source.But do n't ignore the " liar , liar , pants on fire " scenario .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The perpetrator is claiming he received the explosives from Al-Qaeda in Jemen.
He did visit Jemen before boarding this flight, so that is quite likely the source.But don't ignore the "liar, liar, pants on fire" scenario.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556014</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Beryllium Sphere(tm)</author>
	<datestamp>1261845360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you search based on ethnicity, they'll just recruit people like John Walker Lindh. Our enemies are perfectly capable of thought.</p><p>Also, look up the number of dangerous actions by non-Muslims.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you search based on ethnicity , they 'll just recruit people like John Walker Lindh .
Our enemies are perfectly capable of thought.Also , look up the number of dangerous actions by non-Muslims .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you search based on ethnicity, they'll just recruit people like John Walker Lindh.
Our enemies are perfectly capable of thought.Also, look up the number of dangerous actions by non-Muslims.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559538</id>
	<title>Re:This attack was perfectly succesful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261832160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is supposed to inspire fear? Some idiot sets himself on fire and then gets his ass kicked up and down the plane, and that's supposed to inspire fear?</p><p>Oh. Sorry. Forgot this is the land of FOX. Land of the sheep, home of the inane. All visitors to America, please have your passports and be ready for anal violation.</p><p>~X~</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is supposed to inspire fear ?
Some idiot sets himself on fire and then gets his ass kicked up and down the plane , and that 's supposed to inspire fear ? Oh .
Sorry. Forgot this is the land of FOX .
Land of the sheep , home of the inane .
All visitors to America , please have your passports and be ready for anal violation. ~ X ~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is supposed to inspire fear?
Some idiot sets himself on fire and then gets his ass kicked up and down the plane, and that's supposed to inspire fear?Oh.
Sorry. Forgot this is the land of FOX.
Land of the sheep, home of the inane.
All visitors to America, please have your passports and be ready for anal violation.~X~</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557142</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261855260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...</p><p>what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE. i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky.</p></div><p>Wrong.</p><p>Take him alive, but rip off his genitals by the roots so he's an example of, "Fuck with us and YOU get to be one of SOMEONE ELSE's 72 virgins":</p><p>Tie a nice, 10-15 foot cord to his genitals.  Tie the other end to a seat near the exit door.  When the plane rolls to a stop, open the door, wait for TV cameras to start rolling, then drop terrorist out the door so he drops the 20-25 feet to the concrete.  Watch gonads get ripped out by the roots 5 feet above the ground.</p><p>Then, pop the slide, slide down and drive a ham sandwich up his ass Jeffrey Dahmer-style so far that it pops out his eyes.</p><p>All on TV</p><p>Think Al-Jezeera will run THAT video hundreds of times?</p><p>Doesn't matter, the jihadis will see it anyway.</p><p>Terrorist lives, next 50 prospective terrorists say "No thanks" to Al Qaeda recruiter.</p><p>And when we capture Osama Bin Laden, put him on a plane full of pigs and oil drums full of flammables.  Put him in a cage.  Put TV cameras on him, broadcasting from the plane.  Put plane on autopilot circling Quetta, Pakistan.  Pilots bail out.  Let plane circle and broadcast pictures of Osama and pigs all together for hours until plane runs out of fuel and crashes, mixing Osama's body with pig carcasses.</p><p>Remember the Al Qaeda hijacking plot from maybe 2005 or 2006 that was busted?  One of the target flights of that plot was UA192 - United Airlines Flight 192, departing 6:00 AM from LAX bound for IAD.  At the time of that plot, I was on that flight two or three times a month.</p><p>So, for any jihadi loons reading this:  we're not all a bunch of weak pussies who think being nice will solve everything and who think putting underwear on jihaidi heand and photographing them or subjecting Khalid Sheik Mohammad to interrogation techniques that people put themselves through to "prove it's torture" is the epitome of evil (hint:  no one volunteers to subject themselves to real torture...).  Some of us are more than willing to totally fuck you up.</p><p>And guess what?  Despite what you may see in the news, we're in the majority in the US (you did see George W. Bush win reelection, didn't you?  Despite the media being array against him for years?  And look at Obama's DISapproval ratings in the US...)  And if you ever do manage a successful attack on the US, we won't be allowing the wobbly pussies to be our voice any more and you'll get to see the true pissed-off heart of the country that dropped two nukes on Japan - after spending a few years firebombing entire cities into oblivion.</p><p>So, jihadis, take your two-bit desert thug pedophile "prophet" and his entire death cult designed to enrich your leaders as you die for them and FUCK YOU.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE .
i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky.Wrong.Take him alive , but rip off his genitals by the roots so he 's an example of , " Fuck with us and YOU get to be one of SOMEONE ELSE 's 72 virgins " : Tie a nice , 10-15 foot cord to his genitals .
Tie the other end to a seat near the exit door .
When the plane rolls to a stop , open the door , wait for TV cameras to start rolling , then drop terrorist out the door so he drops the 20-25 feet to the concrete .
Watch gonads get ripped out by the roots 5 feet above the ground.Then , pop the slide , slide down and drive a ham sandwich up his ass Jeffrey Dahmer-style so far that it pops out his eyes.All on TVThink Al-Jezeera will run THAT video hundreds of times ? Does n't matter , the jihadis will see it anyway.Terrorist lives , next 50 prospective terrorists say " No thanks " to Al Qaeda recruiter.And when we capture Osama Bin Laden , put him on a plane full of pigs and oil drums full of flammables .
Put him in a cage .
Put TV cameras on him , broadcasting from the plane .
Put plane on autopilot circling Quetta , Pakistan .
Pilots bail out .
Let plane circle and broadcast pictures of Osama and pigs all together for hours until plane runs out of fuel and crashes , mixing Osama 's body with pig carcasses.Remember the Al Qaeda hijacking plot from maybe 2005 or 2006 that was busted ?
One of the target flights of that plot was UA192 - United Airlines Flight 192 , departing 6 : 00 AM from LAX bound for IAD .
At the time of that plot , I was on that flight two or three times a month.So , for any jihadi loons reading this : we 're not all a bunch of weak pussies who think being nice will solve everything and who think putting underwear on jihaidi heand and photographing them or subjecting Khalid Sheik Mohammad to interrogation techniques that people put themselves through to " prove it 's torture " is the epitome of evil ( hint : no one volunteers to subject themselves to real torture... ) .
Some of us are more than willing to totally fuck you up.And guess what ?
Despite what you may see in the news , we 're in the majority in the US ( you did see George W. Bush win reelection , did n't you ?
Despite the media being array against him for years ?
And look at Obama 's DISapproval ratings in the US... ) And if you ever do manage a successful attack on the US , we wo n't be allowing the wobbly pussies to be our voice any more and you 'll get to see the true pissed-off heart of the country that dropped two nukes on Japan - after spending a few years firebombing entire cities into oblivion.So , jihadis , take your two-bit desert thug pedophile " prophet " and his entire death cult designed to enrich your leaders as you die for them and FUCK YOU .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE.
i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky.Wrong.Take him alive, but rip off his genitals by the roots so he's an example of, "Fuck with us and YOU get to be one of SOMEONE ELSE's 72 virgins":Tie a nice, 10-15 foot cord to his genitals.
Tie the other end to a seat near the exit door.
When the plane rolls to a stop, open the door, wait for TV cameras to start rolling, then drop terrorist out the door so he drops the 20-25 feet to the concrete.
Watch gonads get ripped out by the roots 5 feet above the ground.Then, pop the slide, slide down and drive a ham sandwich up his ass Jeffrey Dahmer-style so far that it pops out his eyes.All on TVThink Al-Jezeera will run THAT video hundreds of times?Doesn't matter, the jihadis will see it anyway.Terrorist lives, next 50 prospective terrorists say "No thanks" to Al Qaeda recruiter.And when we capture Osama Bin Laden, put him on a plane full of pigs and oil drums full of flammables.
Put him in a cage.
Put TV cameras on him, broadcasting from the plane.
Put plane on autopilot circling Quetta, Pakistan.
Pilots bail out.
Let plane circle and broadcast pictures of Osama and pigs all together for hours until plane runs out of fuel and crashes, mixing Osama's body with pig carcasses.Remember the Al Qaeda hijacking plot from maybe 2005 or 2006 that was busted?
One of the target flights of that plot was UA192 - United Airlines Flight 192, departing 6:00 AM from LAX bound for IAD.
At the time of that plot, I was on that flight two or three times a month.So, for any jihadi loons reading this:  we're not all a bunch of weak pussies who think being nice will solve everything and who think putting underwear on jihaidi heand and photographing them or subjecting Khalid Sheik Mohammad to interrogation techniques that people put themselves through to "prove it's torture" is the epitome of evil (hint:  no one volunteers to subject themselves to real torture...).
Some of us are more than willing to totally fuck you up.And guess what?
Despite what you may see in the news, we're in the majority in the US (you did see George W. Bush win reelection, didn't you?
Despite the media being array against him for years?
And look at Obama's DISapproval ratings in the US...)  And if you ever do manage a successful attack on the US, we won't be allowing the wobbly pussies to be our voice any more and you'll get to see the true pissed-off heart of the country that dropped two nukes on Japan - after spending a few years firebombing entire cities into oblivion.So, jihadis, take your two-bit desert thug pedophile "prophet" and his entire death cult designed to enrich your leaders as you die for them and FUCK YOU.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555640</id>
	<title>Result</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1261841940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The new rules are hilarious however:</p><p>- Not allowed to have any items or anything on your lap for the last 1 hour of flight<br>- Not allowed to go to toilet during that time either<br>- Crew doesn't tell about cities or landmarks so passengers don't know where they are flying (it's so hard to time that on clock)</p><p>What is that going to improve?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The new rules are hilarious however : - Not allowed to have any items or anything on your lap for the last 1 hour of flight- Not allowed to go to toilet during that time either- Crew does n't tell about cities or landmarks so passengers do n't know where they are flying ( it 's so hard to time that on clock ) What is that going to improve ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The new rules are hilarious however:- Not allowed to have any items or anything on your lap for the last 1 hour of flight- Not allowed to go to toilet during that time either- Crew doesn't tell about cities or landmarks so passengers don't know where they are flying (it's so hard to time that on clock)What is that going to improve?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558798</id>
	<title>From Nigerian spam to Nigerian blam?</title>
	<author>toriver</author>
	<datestamp>1261825380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well I loled.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well I loled .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well I loled.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556596</id>
	<title>Sounds like Kinepak</title>
	<author>Deton8</author>
	<datestamp>1261850520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the vague and incompetent description by the news media, the explosive device sounds like Kinepak or something similar.  This is a little tube filled with ammonium nitrate, aluminum powder, plus proprietary stuff; to which you take a tube of red liquid (nitromethane and dye) and pour in the top.  Eventually when the liquid soaks all the way through, you have a cap-sensitive blasting agent that's about as strong as dynamite when in a confined place.    There's plenty of room for "operator error", though, as this material has to be handled properly if you want it to work.  And it needs the right type of blasting cap.  But even if he did everything right, I don't think it's powerful enought to bring down a jet unless it hit something critical.</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the vague and incompetent description by the news media , the explosive device sounds like Kinepak or something similar .
This is a little tube filled with ammonium nitrate , aluminum powder , plus proprietary stuff ; to which you take a tube of red liquid ( nitromethane and dye ) and pour in the top .
Eventually when the liquid soaks all the way through , you have a cap-sensitive blasting agent that 's about as strong as dynamite when in a confined place .
There 's plenty of room for " operator error " , though , as this material has to be handled properly if you want it to work .
And it needs the right type of blasting cap .
But even if he did everything right , I do n't think it 's powerful enought to bring down a jet unless it hit something critical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the vague and incompetent description by the news media, the explosive device sounds like Kinepak or something similar.
This is a little tube filled with ammonium nitrate, aluminum powder, plus proprietary stuff; to which you take a tube of red liquid (nitromethane and dye) and pour in the top.
Eventually when the liquid soaks all the way through, you have a cap-sensitive blasting agent that's about as strong as dynamite when in a confined place.
There's plenty of room for "operator error", though, as this material has to be handled properly if you want it to work.
And it needs the right type of blasting cap.
But even if he did everything right, I don't think it's powerful enought to bring down a jet unless it hit something critical.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556582</id>
	<title>incomplete</title>
	<author>anonieuweling</author>
	<datestamp>1261850400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For a terrorism-centred country like the USA this is a very incomplete report.<br>
No details about what was on fire or the person that attacked the supposed terrorist.
See <a href="http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/5656080/\_\_Hollandse\_Jasper\_pakte\_terrorist\_\_.html?p=1,1" title="telegraaf.nl">http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/5656080/\_\_Hollandse\_Jasper\_pakte\_terrorist\_\_.html?p=1,1</a> [telegraaf.nl] for the raw story.<br>
One wonders: what security-theatre will be the new norm after this incident?</htmltext>
<tokenext>For a terrorism-centred country like the USA this is a very incomplete report .
No details about what was on fire or the person that attacked the supposed terrorist .
See http : //www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/5656080/ \ _ \ _Hollandse \ _Jasper \ _pakte \ _terrorist \ _ \ _.html ? p = 1,1 [ telegraaf.nl ] for the raw story .
One wonders : what security-theatre will be the new norm after this incident ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a terrorism-centred country like the USA this is a very incomplete report.
No details about what was on fire or the person that attacked the supposed terrorist.
See http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/5656080/\_\_Hollandse\_Jasper\_pakte\_terrorist\_\_.html?p=1,1 [telegraaf.nl] for the raw story.
One wonders: what security-theatre will be the new norm after this incident?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557050</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261854420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shhh..... don't give them any ideas.  Of course, I'm sure they've already thought about this one more than I care to know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shhh..... do n't give them any ideas .
Of course , I 'm sure they 've already thought about this one more than I care to know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shhh..... don't give them any ideas.
Of course, I'm sure they've already thought about this one more than I care to know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556660</id>
	<title>Re:Not news for nerds.</title>
	<author>Troed</author>
	<datestamp>1261851060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On 9/11, Slashdot was the only news site to handle the increase in traffic when people all over the world tried to find out what had happened.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On 9/11 , Slashdot was the only news site to handle the increase in traffic when people all over the world tried to find out what had happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On 9/11, Slashdot was the only news site to handle the increase in traffic when people all over the world tried to find out what had happened.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556138</id>
	<title>Re:Fireworks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261846560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>CNN quoting some US senator saying it was a 'quite sophisticated explosive device'.</p></div> </blockquote><p>
You realize of course that this is a relatively low bar.  For some Senators, a fork would be "quite sophisticated".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>CNN quoting some US senator saying it was a 'quite sophisticated explosive device' .
You realize of course that this is a relatively low bar .
For some Senators , a fork would be " quite sophisticated " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CNN quoting some US senator saying it was a 'quite sophisticated explosive device'.
You realize of course that this is a relatively low bar.
For some Senators, a fork would be "quite sophisticated".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556058</id>
	<title>Harold and Kumar go to guantanamo</title>
	<author>Scrameustache</author>
	<datestamp>1261845780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It did not sound like a firecracker in the latest reports I have been hearing on the radio.</p><p>Latest: it was a powder, plus a liquid</p></div><p>It was a bong, not a bomb.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It did not sound like a firecracker in the latest reports I have been hearing on the radio.Latest : it was a powder , plus a liquidIt was a bong , not a bomb .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It did not sound like a firecracker in the latest reports I have been hearing on the radio.Latest: it was a powder, plus a liquidIt was a bong, not a bomb.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30576958</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262002440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stop giving them ideas please. You must be new here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop giving them ideas please .
You must be new here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop giving them ideas please.
You must be new here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556282</id>
	<title>But</title>
	<author>igny</author>
	<datestamp>1261847700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doesn't Detroit have pot on every street corner?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't Detroit have pot on every street corner ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't Detroit have pot on every street corner?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557686</id>
	<title>Re:And there was a great big fizzling sound</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261859820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Darwin award nominee!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Darwin award nominee !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darwin award nominee!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556190</id>
	<title>What really scares me is...</title>
	<author>jcwren</author>
	<datestamp>1261847040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'In a stark departure from the typical passenger instructions issued prior to touchdown, the same attendant added, "Your <b>federally trained</b> flight attendants have taken control of the situation!" according to Mr. Rosenblith'</p><p>That scares me more than someone holding a dead-man switch on a hydrogen bomb.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'In a stark departure from the typical passenger instructions issued prior to touchdown , the same attendant added , " Your federally trained flight attendants have taken control of the situation !
" according to Mr. Rosenblith'That scares me more than someone holding a dead-man switch on a hydrogen bomb .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'In a stark departure from the typical passenger instructions issued prior to touchdown, the same attendant added, "Your federally trained flight attendants have taken control of the situation!
" according to Mr. Rosenblith'That scares me more than someone holding a dead-man switch on a hydrogen bomb.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558324</id>
	<title>Predict the Overreaction</title>
	<author>MarkvW</author>
	<datestamp>1261821660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Our government responds like a bull in a china shop to stuff like this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Our government responds like a bull in a china shop to stuff like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our government responds like a bull in a china shop to stuff like this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560664</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful</title>
	<author>starfire83</author>
	<datestamp>1261848300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That works. However, would all cargo be subject to a 6ft drop?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That works .
However , would all cargo be subject to a 6ft drop ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That works.
However, would all cargo be subject to a 6ft drop?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</id>
	<title>Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Alain Williams</author>
	<datestamp>1261842420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If this was really an al-Qaeda plot - then why did he not succeed in crashing the airplane ? Are you really trying to convince me that they are a bunch of incompetents who just manage to cause a little damage but that is all ?<p>
These guys are not stupid, if they wanted to do it they would succeed. I suspect that the bloke is a lone nutter who wanted to draw attention to himself or had some grudge or something. He may even have sympathised with al-Qaeda - but that does not make it an al-Qaeda plot.</p><p>
However the result of this is that the various security agencies around the world will use this as as excuse to increase the boarding checks resulting in more pain to us and their continued employment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this was really an al-Qaeda plot - then why did he not succeed in crashing the airplane ?
Are you really trying to convince me that they are a bunch of incompetents who just manage to cause a little damage but that is all ?
These guys are not stupid , if they wanted to do it they would succeed .
I suspect that the bloke is a lone nutter who wanted to draw attention to himself or had some grudge or something .
He may even have sympathised with al-Qaeda - but that does not make it an al-Qaeda plot .
However the result of this is that the various security agencies around the world will use this as as excuse to increase the boarding checks resulting in more pain to us and their continued employment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this was really an al-Qaeda plot - then why did he not succeed in crashing the airplane ?
Are you really trying to convince me that they are a bunch of incompetents who just manage to cause a little damage but that is all ?
These guys are not stupid, if they wanted to do it they would succeed.
I suspect that the bloke is a lone nutter who wanted to draw attention to himself or had some grudge or something.
He may even have sympathised with al-Qaeda - but that does not make it an al-Qaeda plot.
However the result of this is that the various security agencies around the world will use this as as excuse to increase the boarding checks resulting in more pain to us and their continued employment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30682512</id>
	<title>Re:Probable Translation</title>
	<author>Simulant</author>
	<datestamp>1231344420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As subsequent news has proved me wrong I'd like to ammend my initial analysis to:</p><p>"It's amateur hour at Al Qaeda in Yemen"</p><p>I refuse to be afraid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As subsequent news has proved me wrong I 'd like to ammend my initial analysis to : " It 's amateur hour at Al Qaeda in Yemen " I refuse to be afraid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As subsequent news has proved me wrong I'd like to ammend my initial analysis to:"It's amateur hour at Al Qaeda in Yemen"I refuse to be afraid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555704</id>
	<title>Just tell me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261842480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just tell me that this guy did not carry the explosives inside his anus. Imagine TSA inspectors and their updated security guidelines.</p><p>(Too early?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just tell me that this guy did not carry the explosives inside his anus .
Imagine TSA inspectors and their updated security guidelines .
( Too early ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just tell me that this guy did not carry the explosives inside his anus.
Imagine TSA inspectors and their updated security guidelines.
(Too early?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557772</id>
	<title>Re:"possibly a firecracker"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261860600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe they've upgraded the grenades since then, but and incendiary grenade will go through an engine block in less than five minutes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they 've upgraded the grenades since then , but and incendiary grenade will go through an engine block in less than five minutes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they've upgraded the grenades since then, but and incendiary grenade will go through an engine block in less than five minutes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560490</id>
	<title>whats that smell...????</title>
	<author>FragHARD</author>
	<datestamp>1261845780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>[sniff sniff] ChestNutz roasting on an open fire..... kinds of puts you in the holiday spirit doesn't it????<br><br>On another note... AP scrubs news releases of having mention of certain words..... like 'muslim'</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ sniff sniff ] ChestNutz roasting on an open fire..... kinds of puts you in the holiday spirit does n't it ? ? ?
? On another note... AP scrubs news releases of having mention of certain words..... like 'muslim'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[sniff sniff] ChestNutz roasting on an open fire..... kinds of puts you in the holiday spirit doesn't it???
?On another note... AP scrubs news releases of having mention of certain words..... like 'muslim'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558242</id>
	<title>Re:Fucking douchebag</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261820880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean it will be interesting to note little or no difference ?</p><p>Already we know there is no difference in the way they treat wall street<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean it will be interesting to note little or no difference ? Already we know there is no difference in the way they treat wall street .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean it will be interesting to note little or no difference ?Already we know there is no difference in the way they treat wall street ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557100</id>
	<title>Because to do otherwise would have been murder</title>
	<author>Chemisor</author>
	<datestamp>1261854840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE</p><p>What you obviously don't realize is that the use of deadly force in self defense is permitted only in very specific and highly restricted circumstances. For one, the attacker must have caused an immediate mortal threat to someone. In this case, he wasn't the threat; the "bomb" was the threat, so unless you saw him holding a trigger, you would not have the justification to kill him.</p><p>Second, you are not allowed to kill him if he can be subdued, as indeed happened here. Self defense argument is only applicable for as long as the attacker is an <em>immediate</em> threat to your life. If he's in a headlock and has burning pants, that is unlikely to be accepted in court.</p><p>Third, depending on the jurisdiction, you may also have the duty to retreat and be allowed to kill him only if he pursues you into a corner.</p><p>Fourth, whether you were justified or not in killing him, you are going to jail anyway until the trial. Good luck trying to pay your $100000 bail (yes, they really can set it that high). Then you'll have to pay for a defense lawyer to argue why you committed justifiable homicide instead of murder. Lawyers are expensive, and due to your non-zero income you probably do not qualify for getting a public attorney. All the while you're missing work, getting your face plastered all over the newspaper, and being accused of being a cold blooded murderer.</p><p>All I can say is, you better think twice before using deadly force in self defense. Maybe even thrice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVEWhat you obviously do n't realize is that the use of deadly force in self defense is permitted only in very specific and highly restricted circumstances .
For one , the attacker must have caused an immediate mortal threat to someone .
In this case , he was n't the threat ; the " bomb " was the threat , so unless you saw him holding a trigger , you would not have the justification to kill him.Second , you are not allowed to kill him if he can be subdued , as indeed happened here .
Self defense argument is only applicable for as long as the attacker is an immediate threat to your life .
If he 's in a headlock and has burning pants , that is unlikely to be accepted in court.Third , depending on the jurisdiction , you may also have the duty to retreat and be allowed to kill him only if he pursues you into a corner.Fourth , whether you were justified or not in killing him , you are going to jail anyway until the trial .
Good luck trying to pay your $ 100000 bail ( yes , they really can set it that high ) .
Then you 'll have to pay for a defense lawyer to argue why you committed justifiable homicide instead of murder .
Lawyers are expensive , and due to your non-zero income you probably do not qualify for getting a public attorney .
All the while you 're missing work , getting your face plastered all over the newspaper , and being accused of being a cold blooded murderer.All I can say is , you better think twice before using deadly force in self defense .
Maybe even thrice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVEWhat you obviously don't realize is that the use of deadly force in self defense is permitted only in very specific and highly restricted circumstances.
For one, the attacker must have caused an immediate mortal threat to someone.
In this case, he wasn't the threat; the "bomb" was the threat, so unless you saw him holding a trigger, you would not have the justification to kill him.Second, you are not allowed to kill him if he can be subdued, as indeed happened here.
Self defense argument is only applicable for as long as the attacker is an immediate threat to your life.
If he's in a headlock and has burning pants, that is unlikely to be accepted in court.Third, depending on the jurisdiction, you may also have the duty to retreat and be allowed to kill him only if he pursues you into a corner.Fourth, whether you were justified or not in killing him, you are going to jail anyway until the trial.
Good luck trying to pay your $100000 bail (yes, they really can set it that high).
Then you'll have to pay for a defense lawyer to argue why you committed justifiable homicide instead of murder.
Lawyers are expensive, and due to your non-zero income you probably do not qualify for getting a public attorney.
All the while you're missing work, getting your face plastered all over the newspaper, and being accused of being a cold blooded murderer.All I can say is, you better think twice before using deadly force in self defense.
Maybe even thrice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555714</id>
	<title>The message is clear</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261842540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The message is clear: Don't fuck with people flying in to Detroit. We have very little to lose. I can see that scenario playing out now:</p><p>"I will blow up the plane!"</p><p>"Jackass, I'm *willingly* leaving a place with universal health care, low crime, and pot on every street corner to go *home* to a city with crushing illiteracy, high crime, and an epic unemployment level. Do you think I really give a flying fuck about dying?"</p><p>I just wonder how many people were uncomfortable with the extra federal attention the flight got when it landed =)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The message is clear : Do n't fuck with people flying in to Detroit .
We have very little to lose .
I can see that scenario playing out now : " I will blow up the plane !
" " Jackass , I 'm * willingly * leaving a place with universal health care , low crime , and pot on every street corner to go * home * to a city with crushing illiteracy , high crime , and an epic unemployment level .
Do you think I really give a flying fuck about dying ?
" I just wonder how many people were uncomfortable with the extra federal attention the flight got when it landed = )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The message is clear: Don't fuck with people flying in to Detroit.
We have very little to lose.
I can see that scenario playing out now:"I will blow up the plane!
""Jackass, I'm *willingly* leaving a place with universal health care, low crime, and pot on every street corner to go *home* to a city with crushing illiteracy, high crime, and an epic unemployment level.
Do you think I really give a flying fuck about dying?
"I just wonder how many people were uncomfortable with the extra federal attention the flight got when it landed =)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559644</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>ShooterNeo</author>
	<datestamp>1261833480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So would gasoline.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So would gasoline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So would gasoline.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560906</id>
	<title>Re:Security Theater</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261851540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm.. are you sure it's not that near-million people long list of everyone remotely touched by an arab which has been on slashdot before? If so, I understand why they didn't find the needle in the haystack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm.. are you sure it 's not that near-million people long list of everyone remotely touched by an arab which has been on slashdot before ?
If so , I understand why they did n't find the needle in the haystack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm.. are you sure it's not that near-million people long list of everyone remotely touched by an arab which has been on slashdot before?
If so, I understand why they didn't find the needle in the haystack.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556324</id>
	<title>Security Theater</title>
	<author>slasho81</author>
	<datestamp>1261848120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>After all the billions of dollars spent on TSA, great delays and annoyances to customers, fictitious work of thousands of employees, and the unfathomed damage to the airline industry, the one time when an actual terrorist tries to smuggle explosives on board and all this charade fails spectacularly.
<br> <br>
The response? Add more of the same ineffective measures.
<br> <br>
Thank goodness for the incompetence of the terrorist.</htmltext>
<tokenext>After all the billions of dollars spent on TSA , great delays and annoyances to customers , fictitious work of thousands of employees , and the unfathomed damage to the airline industry , the one time when an actual terrorist tries to smuggle explosives on board and all this charade fails spectacularly .
The response ?
Add more of the same ineffective measures .
Thank goodness for the incompetence of the terrorist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all the billions of dollars spent on TSA, great delays and annoyances to customers, fictitious work of thousands of employees, and the unfathomed damage to the airline industry, the one time when an actual terrorist tries to smuggle explosives on board and all this charade fails spectacularly.
The response?
Add more of the same ineffective measures.
Thank goodness for the incompetence of the terrorist.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558266</id>
	<title>Once Again</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261821180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once again, the Three Stooges branch of Al-Qaeda demonstrates an epic FAIL.</p><p>And their TSA counterparts accomplish the same.</p><p>And for this I've had to surrender my shampoo at a security checkpoint, remove my shoes and submit to a pat-down search? I feel MUCH safer now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once again , the Three Stooges branch of Al-Qaeda demonstrates an epic FAIL.And their TSA counterparts accomplish the same.And for this I 've had to surrender my shampoo at a security checkpoint , remove my shoes and submit to a pat-down search ?
I feel MUCH safer now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once again, the Three Stooges branch of Al-Qaeda demonstrates an epic FAIL.And their TSA counterparts accomplish the same.And for this I've had to surrender my shampoo at a security checkpoint, remove my shoes and submit to a pat-down search?
I feel MUCH safer now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30567998</id>
	<title>Re:This attack was perfectly succesful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261931040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly right. And to think that their investment this time didn't even include a single life (no need to convince a suicide bomber about the 72 virgins).
<br>
All the terrorists have to do is to pull off a stunt like this every, say, year, until we're a) bankrupt, and b) so tired of travelling that we sit at home and grow our own corn to eat and live a fucked up life overall.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly right .
And to think that their investment this time did n't even include a single life ( no need to convince a suicide bomber about the 72 virgins ) .
All the terrorists have to do is to pull off a stunt like this every , say , year , until we 're a ) bankrupt , and b ) so tired of travelling that we sit at home and grow our own corn to eat and live a fucked up life overall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly right.
And to think that their investment this time didn't even include a single life (no need to convince a suicide bomber about the 72 virgins).
All the terrorists have to do is to pull off a stunt like this every, say, year, until we're a) bankrupt, and b) so tired of travelling that we sit at home and grow our own corn to eat and live a fucked up life overall.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557114</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261855020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I somehow doubt Adam and Jamie will do a TSA myths episode....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I somehow doubt Adam and Jamie will do a TSA myths episode... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I somehow doubt Adam and Jamie will do a TSA myths episode....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557194</id>
	<title>Re:And there was a great big fizzling sound</title>
	<author>Strider-</author>
	<datestamp>1261855740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And there was a great big fizzing sound as his device failed to accomplish it's task with was either a detonation or an incendiary intended to burn the plane out of the sky.</p></div><p>Except that he did accomplish the task.  They've caused significant disruption, fear, and economic damage to the western world, all for the cost of a plane ticket and a few dollars in chemicals.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And there was a great big fizzing sound as his device failed to accomplish it 's task with was either a detonation or an incendiary intended to burn the plane out of the sky.Except that he did accomplish the task .
They 've caused significant disruption , fear , and economic damage to the western world , all for the cost of a plane ticket and a few dollars in chemicals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And there was a great big fizzing sound as his device failed to accomplish it's task with was either a detonation or an incendiary intended to burn the plane out of the sky.Except that he did accomplish the task.
They've caused significant disruption, fear, and economic damage to the western world, all for the cost of a plane ticket and a few dollars in chemicals.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555968</id>
	<title>Not news for nerds.</title>
	<author>harmonise</author>
	<datestamp>1261845000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is this news appropriate for Slashdot? This has nothing to do with technology or news for nerds. There are plenty of regular news outlets for news like this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this news appropriate for Slashdot ?
This has nothing to do with technology or news for nerds .
There are plenty of regular news outlets for news like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this news appropriate for Slashdot?
This has nothing to do with technology or news for nerds.
There are plenty of regular news outlets for news like this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561154</id>
	<title>Re:It used to be...</title>
	<author>michaelhood</author>
	<datestamp>1261856100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Those were the days when passengers could depend on their captors not being suicidal.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>(Score:1, Insightful)</p></div><p>Al Qaeda modded you down.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those were the days when passengers could depend on their captors not being suicidal .
( Score : 1 , Insightful ) Al Qaeda modded you down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those were the days when passengers could depend on their captors not being suicidal.
(Score:1, Insightful)Al Qaeda modded you down.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555954</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Jah-Wren Ryel</author>
	<datestamp>1261844940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If this was really an al-Qaeda plot - then why did he not succeed in crashing the airplane ? Are you really trying to convince me that they are a bunch of incompetents who just manage to cause a little damage but that is all?</p></div><p>Yeah, imagine that, Al-Qaeda is really just the mouse that made the elephant dance in fright because it got lucky once.<br>After all, Richard Reid was incompetent too.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this was really an al-Qaeda plot - then why did he not succeed in crashing the airplane ?
Are you really trying to convince me that they are a bunch of incompetents who just manage to cause a little damage but that is all ? Yeah , imagine that , Al-Qaeda is really just the mouse that made the elephant dance in fright because it got lucky once.After all , Richard Reid was incompetent too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this was really an al-Qaeda plot - then why did he not succeed in crashing the airplane ?
Are you really trying to convince me that they are a bunch of incompetents who just manage to cause a little damage but that is all?Yeah, imagine that, Al-Qaeda is really just the mouse that made the elephant dance in fright because it got lucky once.After all, Richard Reid was incompetent too.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556482</id>
	<title>Obama, O-bomb-a</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261849440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Worse than Jimmy Carter.</p><p>At least Carter's feckless foreign policy effects were offshore, in Iran and Panama.</p><p>Obama is trying to get Americans in America killed.</p><p>Don't blame me, I voted for the American!!!!!!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Worse than Jimmy Carter.At least Carter 's feckless foreign policy effects were offshore , in Iran and Panama.Obama is trying to get Americans in America killed.Do n't blame me , I voted for the American ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Worse than Jimmy Carter.At least Carter's feckless foreign policy effects were offshore, in Iran and Panama.Obama is trying to get Americans in America killed.Don't blame me, I voted for the American!!!!!!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558426</id>
	<title>Re:URGNET HELP NEEDED PLS</title>
	<author>RichM</author>
	<datestamp>1261822680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Parent is probably the comment of the decade. Mod up!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Parent is probably the comment of the decade .
Mod up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Parent is probably the comment of the decade.
Mod up!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558846</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>dwillden</author>
	<datestamp>1261825860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah, but nearly 99.9\% of terrorists are Muslim.</p></div><p>I think the Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland might question that stat.  Many Western European countries have decades of leftist/communist terrorists to add in, and the Japanese can toss in Aum Shiriko and the JRA to the numbers as well.  Sendaro Luminoso, FARC, ELN, Tamil Tigers, ELF, ALF... need I go on?
<br> <br>
Just because islamic terrorists are making most the news right now does not make them the 99\% majority of terrorists.  They may have the majority but it isn't 99\%.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but nearly 99.9 \ % of terrorists are Muslim.I think the Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland might question that stat .
Many Western European countries have decades of leftist/communist terrorists to add in , and the Japanese can toss in Aum Shiriko and the JRA to the numbers as well .
Sendaro Luminoso , FARC , ELN , Tamil Tigers , ELF , ALF... need I go on ?
Just because islamic terrorists are making most the news right now does not make them the 99 \ % majority of terrorists .
They may have the majority but it is n't 99 \ % .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but nearly 99.9\% of terrorists are Muslim.I think the Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland might question that stat.
Many Western European countries have decades of leftist/communist terrorists to add in, and the Japanese can toss in Aum Shiriko and the JRA to the numbers as well.
Sendaro Luminoso, FARC, ELN, Tamil Tigers, ELF, ALF... need I go on?
Just because islamic terrorists are making most the news right now does not make them the 99\% majority of terrorists.
They may have the majority but it isn't 99\%.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557898</id>
	<title>Re:Fucking douchebag</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261818240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It'll be interesting to compare Obama's response to the fear-fear-fear responses from the Bush Administration.</p></div><p>Why does he even need to respond?<br>He's got the TSA and media to wind up the hysteria machine for him.</p><p>If he wasn't about "fear-fear-fear" he would have:<br>- Dismantled the TSA by now<br>- Gotten rid of the rainbow-of-terror-color-coded-fear-rating-system<br>- Voted against the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign\_Intelligence\_Surveillance\_Act\_of\_1978\_Amendments\_Act\_of\_2008#Provisions" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">do whatever the fuck you want</a> [wikipedia.org] bill for the NSA</p><p>What's that? New boss just like the old boss?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'll be interesting to compare Obama 's response to the fear-fear-fear responses from the Bush Administration.Why does he even need to respond ? He 's got the TSA and media to wind up the hysteria machine for him.If he was n't about " fear-fear-fear " he would have : - Dismantled the TSA by now- Gotten rid of the rainbow-of-terror-color-coded-fear-rating-system- Voted against the do whatever the fuck you want [ wikipedia.org ] bill for the NSAWhat 's that ?
New boss just like the old boss ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'll be interesting to compare Obama's response to the fear-fear-fear responses from the Bush Administration.Why does he even need to respond?He's got the TSA and media to wind up the hysteria machine for him.If he wasn't about "fear-fear-fear" he would have:- Dismantled the TSA by now- Gotten rid of the rainbow-of-terror-color-coded-fear-rating-system- Voted against the do whatever the fuck you want [wikipedia.org] bill for the NSAWhat's that?
New boss just like the old boss?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557148</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>quantic\_oscillation7</author>
	<datestamp>1261855320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what's your definition of smart people?</p><p>according to the oficial conspiracy theory of 911, the supposed leader was an engineer!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what 's your definition of smart people ? according to the oficial conspiracy theory of 911 , the supposed leader was an engineer ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what's your definition of smart people?according to the oficial conspiracy theory of 911, the supposed leader was an engineer!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555978</id>
	<title>Re:The message is clear</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261845120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed. Messing with Detroiters? This guy is lucky that some of his body parts are not following him in a bag.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
Messing with Detroiters ?
This guy is lucky that some of his body parts are not following him in a bag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
Messing with Detroiters?
This guy is lucky that some of his body parts are not following him in a bag.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557282</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261856520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's your point? Have you ever heard of the power law? Most are either small successes or fail. It's the occasional "success" that is the problem. Oh, that and their willingness to continue trying and trying and trying<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's your point ?
Have you ever heard of the power law ?
Most are either small successes or fail .
It 's the occasional " success " that is the problem .
Oh , that and their willingness to continue trying and trying and trying ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's your point?
Have you ever heard of the power law?
Most are either small successes or fail.
It's the occasional "success" that is the problem.
Oh, that and their willingness to continue trying and trying and trying ....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560280</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1261842900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Just plans is how we got those silly no-liquids rules."</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLX" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLX</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p><a href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/tatp.htm" title="globalsecurity.org">http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/tatp.htm</a> [globalsecurity.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Just plans is how we got those silly no-liquids rules .
" http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLX [ wikipedia.org ] http : //www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/tatp.htm [ globalsecurity.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Just plans is how we got those silly no-liquids rules.
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLX [wikipedia.org]http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/tatp.htm [globalsecurity.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556260</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557812</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>dwillden</author>
	<datestamp>1261860780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Correct, in fact it was the third attempt that actually hit the Cole.  One sank, one exploded as they were prepping it, and finally they got the Cole with the third one).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Correct , in fact it was the third attempt that actually hit the Cole .
One sank , one exploded as they were prepping it , and finally they got the Cole with the third one ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correct, in fact it was the third attempt that actually hit the Cole.
One sank, one exploded as they were prepping it, and finally they got the Cole with the third one).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557158</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261855440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly! How smart is someone ready to commit suicide to kill a bunch of innocents in the name of any cause? Is it someone you think is smart?</p><p>Yes, terrorists can be stupid and most of them are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly !
How smart is someone ready to commit suicide to kill a bunch of innocents in the name of any cause ?
Is it someone you think is smart ? Yes , terrorists can be stupid and most of them are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly!
How smart is someone ready to commit suicide to kill a bunch of innocents in the name of any cause?
Is it someone you think is smart?Yes, terrorists can be stupid and most of them are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556666</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1261851060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Mandatory bacon sandwiches before boarding the plane. Everybody wins.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Your Jewish banking overlords would like a word with you.<br> <br>

This way please.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mandatory bacon sandwiches before boarding the plane .
Everybody wins .
Your Jewish banking overlords would like a word with you .
This way please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mandatory bacon sandwiches before boarding the plane.
Everybody wins.
Your Jewish banking overlords would like a word with you.
This way please.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556652</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>misexistentialist</author>
	<datestamp>1261850940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Al-Qaeda usually launches several simultaneous attacks to maximize the chance of success before the defenders can close the vulnerability. If this attack is what they have been reduced to they are less a threat than common mechanical failures and can be ignored.<p><div class="quote"><p>  what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE. i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky.</p></div><p>You'd be better off dead than in jail.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Al-Qaeda usually launches several simultaneous attacks to maximize the chance of success before the defenders can close the vulnerability .
If this attack is what they have been reduced to they are less a threat than common mechanical failures and can be ignored .
what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE .
i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky.You 'd be better off dead than in jail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Al-Qaeda usually launches several simultaneous attacks to maximize the chance of success before the defenders can close the vulnerability.
If this attack is what they have been reduced to they are less a threat than common mechanical failures and can be ignored.
what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE.
i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky.You'd be better off dead than in jail.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557668</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261859700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not a big guy, but I would tap other men on the shoulder on the way to the troublemakers seat saying "Let's roll".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not a big guy , but I would tap other men on the shoulder on the way to the troublemakers seat saying " Let 's roll " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not a big guy, but I would tap other men on the shoulder on the way to the troublemakers seat saying "Let's roll".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556528</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>bcmm</author>
	<datestamp>1261849860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><blockquote><div><p>"At least 99.9\% of Muslim men aren't terrorists. You're arguing for strip searching about 800 million people in order to find a few thousand people. Your odds are only slightly better than strip searching the 99.99\% of Christian men who aren't terrorists to find the 0.01\% who are (e.g. Tim McVeigh or members of the Real IRA).</p></div></blockquote><p>

Yeah, but nearly 99.9\% of terrorists are Muslim.</p></div></blockquote><p>


[Citation needed], unless you're defining white people as automatically not terrorists (not that "nearly 99.9\%" is a particularly meaningful claim). Where I live, the terrorists seem to be neo-fascist fuckwits or animal rights bombers.<br>But that's beside the point. What fraction of the "terrorists" do you think are men? Maybe all men should be kept off flights? I suspect you fundamentally do not grasp statistics.</p><blockquote><div><p>An example of Timithy [sic] McVeigh is more like<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.000000001\% than<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.01\%</p></div></blockquote><p>
If McVeigh represents<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.000000001\% of terrorists, the human race is pretty much fucked, finding itself vastly outnumbered by the 100 billion terrorists on this planet. I wonder where they all find space to live?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" At least 99.9 \ % of Muslim men are n't terrorists .
You 're arguing for strip searching about 800 million people in order to find a few thousand people .
Your odds are only slightly better than strip searching the 99.99 \ % of Christian men who are n't terrorists to find the 0.01 \ % who are ( e.g .
Tim McVeigh or members of the Real IRA ) .
Yeah , but nearly 99.9 \ % of terrorists are Muslim .
[ Citation needed ] , unless you 're defining white people as automatically not terrorists ( not that " nearly 99.9 \ % " is a particularly meaningful claim ) .
Where I live , the terrorists seem to be neo-fascist fuckwits or animal rights bombers.But that 's beside the point .
What fraction of the " terrorists " do you think are men ?
Maybe all men should be kept off flights ?
I suspect you fundamentally do not grasp statistics.An example of Timithy [ sic ] McVeigh is more like .000000001 \ % than .01 \ % If McVeigh represents .000000001 \ % of terrorists , the human race is pretty much fucked , finding itself vastly outnumbered by the 100 billion terrorists on this planet .
I wonder where they all find space to live ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"At least 99.9\% of Muslim men aren't terrorists.
You're arguing for strip searching about 800 million people in order to find a few thousand people.
Your odds are only slightly better than strip searching the 99.99\% of Christian men who aren't terrorists to find the 0.01\% who are (e.g.
Tim McVeigh or members of the Real IRA).
Yeah, but nearly 99.9\% of terrorists are Muslim.
[Citation needed], unless you're defining white people as automatically not terrorists (not that "nearly 99.9\%" is a particularly meaningful claim).
Where I live, the terrorists seem to be neo-fascist fuckwits or animal rights bombers.But that's beside the point.
What fraction of the "terrorists" do you think are men?
Maybe all men should be kept off flights?
I suspect you fundamentally do not grasp statistics.An example of Timithy [sic] McVeigh is more like .000000001\% than .01\%
If McVeigh represents .000000001\% of terrorists, the human race is pretty much fucked, finding itself vastly outnumbered by the 100 billion terrorists on this planet.
I wonder where they all find space to live?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556104</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261846140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hear you but instead they should just put a fucking bullet in their skull and be done with it. Islam is a plague that needs whipped out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear you but instead they should just put a fucking bullet in their skull and be done with it .
Islam is a plague that needs whipped out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear you but instead they should just put a fucking bullet in their skull and be done with it.
Islam is a plague that needs whipped out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30602134</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259853660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The sad thing is, these pathetic incompetent terrorists are going to be responsible for causing billions of dollars to spent on extra airport security and many, many lifetimes of time will be wasted in stupid delays.</p></div><p>Causing billions of dollars to be spent on extra airport security doesn't sound incompetent to me. Now suicide bombers don't even have die to win their battles. Anyone think the war is being won?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The sad thing is , these pathetic incompetent terrorists are going to be responsible for causing billions of dollars to spent on extra airport security and many , many lifetimes of time will be wasted in stupid delays.Causing billions of dollars to be spent on extra airport security does n't sound incompetent to me .
Now suicide bombers do n't even have die to win their battles .
Anyone think the war is being won ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The sad thing is, these pathetic incompetent terrorists are going to be responsible for causing billions of dollars to spent on extra airport security and many, many lifetimes of time will be wasted in stupid delays.Causing billions of dollars to be spent on extra airport security doesn't sound incompetent to me.
Now suicide bombers don't even have die to win their battles.
Anyone think the war is being won?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555810</id>
	<title>Re:It used to be...</title>
	<author>Bigbutt</author>
	<datestamp>1261843620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shit yea.</p><p>"You wanna go see Allah? Here, let me give you a fist." *whap* *whap* *whap*</p><p>[John]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shit yea .
" You wan na go see Allah ?
Here , let me give you a fist .
" * whap * * whap * * whap * [ John ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shit yea.
"You wanna go see Allah?
Here, let me give you a fist.
" *whap* *whap* *whap*[John]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30562250</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261914960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have convinced me, we have to imprison all 10th graders.  What's the next step?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have convinced me , we have to imprison all 10th graders .
What 's the next step ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have convinced me, we have to imprison all 10th graders.
What's the next step?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559420</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261830840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Yeah, but nearly 99.9\% of terrorists are Muslim.</p></div></blockquote><p>In your country maybe. In Iraq and Afghanistan there are literally thousands of American/English/European christian cross-wearing terrorists sent there by an illiterate bible thumper.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but nearly 99.9 \ % of terrorists are Muslim.In your country maybe .
In Iraq and Afghanistan there are literally thousands of American/English/European christian cross-wearing terrorists sent there by an illiterate bible thumper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but nearly 99.9\% of terrorists are Muslim.In your country maybe.
In Iraq and Afghanistan there are literally thousands of American/English/European christian cross-wearing terrorists sent there by an illiterate bible thumper.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556676</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>rainsford</author>
	<datestamp>1261851180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even if that were true, which it's not, it doesn't really mean anything.  Even if 100\% of terrorists were Muslim, you still have all the problems the GP outlined.  There is still no easy way to identify someone as Muslim, especially if they are trying to hide their beliefs.  It's still grossly unconstitutional to single people out by religion.  And most importantly, you are STILL persecuting a group of people, the vast, VAST majority of whom are innocent, in an attempt to find a few bad guys.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if that were true , which it 's not , it does n't really mean anything .
Even if 100 \ % of terrorists were Muslim , you still have all the problems the GP outlined .
There is still no easy way to identify someone as Muslim , especially if they are trying to hide their beliefs .
It 's still grossly unconstitutional to single people out by religion .
And most importantly , you are STILL persecuting a group of people , the vast , VAST majority of whom are innocent , in an attempt to find a few bad guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if that were true, which it's not, it doesn't really mean anything.
Even if 100\% of terrorists were Muslim, you still have all the problems the GP outlined.
There is still no easy way to identify someone as Muslim, especially if they are trying to hide their beliefs.
It's still grossly unconstitutional to single people out by religion.
And most importantly, you are STILL persecuting a group of people, the vast, VAST majority of whom are innocent, in an attempt to find a few bad guys.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555756</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Rakshasa Taisab</author>
	<datestamp>1261843080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I also think all American's (from the US) should be strip searched and left to wander around the Scandinavian winter cold a few hours just to make sure they didn't bring any Big Macs with them.</p><p>Fair is fair, no?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I also think all American 's ( from the US ) should be strip searched and left to wander around the Scandinavian winter cold a few hours just to make sure they did n't bring any Big Macs with them.Fair is fair , no ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also think all American's (from the US) should be strip searched and left to wander around the Scandinavian winter cold a few hours just to make sure they didn't bring any Big Macs with them.Fair is fair, no?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556196</id>
	<title>....wooooohoooooooohooo...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261847040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Oh, this is wonderful. Now we will probably be strip searched and forced to wear airline clothing. Why not just reconfigure planes to be more like cargo vehicles and put all passengers into a coma and pack and transport them like packages?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></div><p>Yeah, and the airline clothing will consist of mental hospital style restrictive overalls with a built in tazer and a big zipper at the back to make<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....wooooohoooooooohooo... surprise cavity searches easier. I don't know about you guys but I'll stick to rail, road and sea transport from now on.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , this is wonderful .
Now we will probably be strip searched and forced to wear airline clothing .
Why not just reconfigure planes to be more like cargo vehicles and put all passengers into a coma and pack and transport them like packages ?
: ( Yeah , and the airline clothing will consist of mental hospital style restrictive overalls with a built in tazer and a big zipper at the back to make ....wooooohoooooooohooo... surprise cavity searches easier .
I do n't know about you guys but I 'll stick to rail , road and sea transport from now on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, this is wonderful.
Now we will probably be strip searched and forced to wear airline clothing.
Why not just reconfigure planes to be more like cargo vehicles and put all passengers into a coma and pack and transport them like packages?
:(Yeah, and the airline clothing will consist of mental hospital style restrictive overalls with a built in tazer and a big zipper at the back to make ....wooooohoooooooohooo... surprise cavity searches easier.
I don't know about you guys but I'll stick to rail, road and sea transport from now on.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556182</id>
	<title>Re:The message is clear</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261847040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That stereotype is kinda funny, but you should try visiting Michigan.</p><p>The warmest, hardest working, most loving people in the world persist here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That stereotype is kinda funny , but you should try visiting Michigan.The warmest , hardest working , most loving people in the world persist here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That stereotype is kinda funny, but you should try visiting Michigan.The warmest, hardest working, most loving people in the world persist here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556974</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261853700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't the 5th also apply?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't the 5th also apply ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't the 5th also apply?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556444</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>MickyTheIdiot</author>
	<datestamp>1261849140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We don't need a Muslim detector.  We simply need an idiot detector.  Ban all idiots from airplanes.  That should solve the problem.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. is full of the best and brightest... get to it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We do n't need a Muslim detector .
We simply need an idiot detector .
Ban all idiots from airplanes .
That should solve the problem .
/. is full of the best and brightest... get to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We don't need a Muslim detector.
We simply need an idiot detector.
Ban all idiots from airplanes.
That should solve the problem.
/. is full of the best and brightest... get to it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556090</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261846080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Religion isn't like skin color - something you're born with that you can;t change.  If everybody hates you because of yours, maybe it's a subtle hint to choose a different one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Religion is n't like skin color - something you 're born with that you can ; t change .
If everybody hates you because of yours , maybe it 's a subtle hint to choose a different one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Religion isn't like skin color - something you're born with that you can;t change.
If everybody hates you because of yours, maybe it's a subtle hint to choose a different one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560864</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261851000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE. i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky.</p></div><p>Mr tough guy, I'm guessing you have never actually seen spontaneous lynch mob occur.  It's horrifying, no matter what the cause is.  No thinking person would want to be part of it.  A group of people beating and tearing into a single person until they die is a lot less glamorous than the romanticised image of 'just cause' that is playing in your head.  I would put a lot of money on the fact that if you were on the plane the Nigerian would still be alive.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE .
i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky.Mr tough guy , I 'm guessing you have never actually seen spontaneous lynch mob occur .
It 's horrifying , no matter what the cause is .
No thinking person would want to be part of it .
A group of people beating and tearing into a single person until they die is a lot less glamorous than the romanticised image of 'just cause ' that is playing in your head .
I would put a lot of money on the fact that if you were on the plane the Nigerian would still be alive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE.
i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky.Mr tough guy, I'm guessing you have never actually seen spontaneous lynch mob occur.
It's horrifying, no matter what the cause is.
No thinking person would want to be part of it.
A group of people beating and tearing into a single person until they die is a lot less glamorous than the romanticised image of 'just cause' that is playing in your head.
I would put a lot of money on the fact that if you were on the plane the Nigerian would still be alive.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555936</id>
	<title>Fucking douchebag</title>
	<author>ickleberry</author>
	<datestamp>1261844580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Expect the Authorities to milk this event for what it's worth when it comes to justifying mandatory pre-flight anal probing sessions, more mass surveillance and the outlawing of encryption they're not sure how to crack.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Expect the Authorities to milk this event for what it 's worth when it comes to justifying mandatory pre-flight anal probing sessions , more mass surveillance and the outlawing of encryption they 're not sure how to crack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Expect the Authorities to milk this event for what it's worth when it comes to justifying mandatory pre-flight anal probing sessions, more mass surveillance and the outlawing of encryption they're not sure how to crack.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556030</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>calixaren</author>
	<datestamp>1261845540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have you forgotten the second wave of London bombings (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21\_July\_2005\_London\_bombings)?
These guys were really bunch of stupid incompetents.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you forgotten the second wave of London bombings ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21 \ _July \ _2005 \ _London \ _bombings ) ?
These guys were really bunch of stupid incompetents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you forgotten the second wave of London bombings (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21\_July\_2005\_London\_bombings)?
These guys were really bunch of stupid incompetents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556134</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Joe U</author>
	<datestamp>1261846500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Are you really trying to convince me that they are a bunch of incompetents who just manage to cause a little damage but that is all ?</p></div><p>Most terrorists, like most other criminals, are not smart people. Smart people don't tend to try and blow themselves up.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you really trying to convince me that they are a bunch of incompetents who just manage to cause a little damage but that is all ? Most terrorists , like most other criminals , are not smart people .
Smart people do n't tend to try and blow themselves up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Are you really trying to convince me that they are a bunch of incompetents who just manage to cause a little damage but that is all ?Most terrorists, like most other criminals, are not smart people.
Smart people don't tend to try and blow themselves up.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556068</id>
	<title>Liar Liar Pants on Fire</title>
	<author>kurtis25</author>
	<datestamp>1261845840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Breaking news politicians will investigate how this man got on the plan. In other news Gil Grissom will return for CSI House of Representatives and have it solved in 42 minutes + commercials.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Breaking news politicians will investigate how this man got on the plan .
In other news Gil Grissom will return for CSI House of Representatives and have it solved in 42 minutes + commercials .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Breaking news politicians will investigate how this man got on the plan.
In other news Gil Grissom will return for CSI House of Representatives and have it solved in 42 minutes + commercials.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556624</id>
	<title>Re:It used to be...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261850700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"it's the passengers and crew that will beat the snot out of the latest Al-Q "martyr."</p><p>Only if the martyr's 'sophisticated explosive device' fails.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" it 's the passengers and crew that will beat the snot out of the latest Al-Q " martyr .
" Only if the martyr 's 'sophisticated explosive device ' fails .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"it's the passengers and crew that will beat the snot out of the latest Al-Q "martyr.
"Only if the martyr's 'sophisticated explosive device' fails.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558880</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Thing 1</author>
	<datestamp>1261826100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Although I've read reports that the terrorist was "sitting dazed in his chair" - he'd probably expected to die right there, and when he didn't he was in shock.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Yeah but the question that's bugging me is, <b>why do these idiots do it in their seats,</b> when they could just as easily breach the outer wall from the toilet!?!??!?  (The cynic in me says that the government is behind it, but he says too much anyway...)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Although I 've read reports that the terrorist was " sitting dazed in his chair " - he 'd probably expected to die right there , and when he did n't he was in shock .
Yeah but the question that 's bugging me is , why do these idiots do it in their seats , when they could just as easily breach the outer wall from the toilet ! ? ! ? ? ! ?
( The cynic in me says that the government is behind it , but he says too much anyway... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although I've read reports that the terrorist was "sitting dazed in his chair" - he'd probably expected to die right there, and when he didn't he was in shock.
Yeah but the question that's bugging me is, why do these idiots do it in their seats, when they could just as easily breach the outer wall from the toilet!?!??!?
(The cynic in me says that the government is behind it, but he says too much anyway...)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556158</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261846740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"At least 99.9\% of Muslim men aren't terrorists. You're arguing for strip searching about 800 million people in order to find a few thousand people. Your odds are only slightly better than strip searching the 99.99\% of Christian men who aren't terrorists to find the 0.01\% who are (e.g. Tim McVeigh or members of the Real IRA).<br></i> </p><p>Yeah, but nearly 99.9\% of terrorists are Muslim.</p><p>An example of  Timithy McVeigh is more like<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.000000001\% than<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.01\%</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" At least 99.9 \ % of Muslim men are n't terrorists .
You 're arguing for strip searching about 800 million people in order to find a few thousand people .
Your odds are only slightly better than strip searching the 99.99 \ % of Christian men who are n't terrorists to find the 0.01 \ % who are ( e.g .
Tim McVeigh or members of the Real IRA ) .
Yeah , but nearly 99.9 \ % of terrorists are Muslim.An example of Timithy McVeigh is more like .000000001 \ % than .01 \ %</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"At least 99.9\% of Muslim men aren't terrorists.
You're arguing for strip searching about 800 million people in order to find a few thousand people.
Your odds are only slightly better than strip searching the 99.99\% of Christian men who aren't terrorists to find the 0.01\% who are (e.g.
Tim McVeigh or members of the Real IRA).
Yeah, but nearly 99.9\% of terrorists are Muslim.An example of  Timithy McVeigh is more like .000000001\% than .01\%</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558894</id>
	<title>In some ways, this plot succeeded...</title>
	<author>Willbur</author>
	<datestamp>1261826160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The TSA causes so much hassle in the US that it is a drain on the country.  Some countries, like Australia, have recently started loosening their restrictions (I hear that metal cutlery is back).</p><p>Imagine you're a terrorist organisation.  You find some idiot willing to do this.  If they succeed, great.  If they fail, then you're still going to inconvenience the entire travelling world in the middle of one of the busiest times of the year.</p><p>Look at the lists of new 'safety rules' that have been instituted.  For Al-Qaeda, that's not a bad consolation prise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The TSA causes so much hassle in the US that it is a drain on the country .
Some countries , like Australia , have recently started loosening their restrictions ( I hear that metal cutlery is back ) .Imagine you 're a terrorist organisation .
You find some idiot willing to do this .
If they succeed , great .
If they fail , then you 're still going to inconvenience the entire travelling world in the middle of one of the busiest times of the year.Look at the lists of new 'safety rules ' that have been instituted .
For Al-Qaeda , that 's not a bad consolation prise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The TSA causes so much hassle in the US that it is a drain on the country.
Some countries, like Australia, have recently started loosening their restrictions (I hear that metal cutlery is back).Imagine you're a terrorist organisation.
You find some idiot willing to do this.
If they succeed, great.
If they fail, then you're still going to inconvenience the entire travelling world in the middle of one of the busiest times of the year.Look at the lists of new 'safety rules' that have been instituted.
For Al-Qaeda, that's not a bad consolation prise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555770</id>
	<title>And there was a great big fizzling sound</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261843140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And there was a great big fizzing sound as his device failed to accomplish it's task with was either a detonation or an incendiary intended to burn the plane out of the sky.</p><p>Since it was in his, ahem, pants or pocket he burned himself where it hurts effectively removing himself from the gene pool either by a lifetime of incarceration or more directly by incineration.</p><p>You'd like to think, ouch that's gotta hurt but then who has sympathy for someone attempting to kill other people with explosives or flames?</p><p>In a way you want the lone wolf jihadies to come out of the woodwork and fail since they illuminate their otherwise low key network connections. It's sorta like a flash light in the darkness of terror plots by individuals or states.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And there was a great big fizzing sound as his device failed to accomplish it 's task with was either a detonation or an incendiary intended to burn the plane out of the sky.Since it was in his , ahem , pants or pocket he burned himself where it hurts effectively removing himself from the gene pool either by a lifetime of incarceration or more directly by incineration.You 'd like to think , ouch that 's got ta hurt but then who has sympathy for someone attempting to kill other people with explosives or flames ? In a way you want the lone wolf jihadies to come out of the woodwork and fail since they illuminate their otherwise low key network connections .
It 's sorta like a flash light in the darkness of terror plots by individuals or states .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And there was a great big fizzing sound as his device failed to accomplish it's task with was either a detonation or an incendiary intended to burn the plane out of the sky.Since it was in his, ahem, pants or pocket he burned himself where it hurts effectively removing himself from the gene pool either by a lifetime of incarceration or more directly by incineration.You'd like to think, ouch that's gotta hurt but then who has sympathy for someone attempting to kill other people with explosives or flames?In a way you want the lone wolf jihadies to come out of the woodwork and fail since they illuminate their otherwise low key network connections.
It's sorta like a flash light in the darkness of terror plots by individuals or states.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555694</id>
	<title>It used to be...</title>
	<author>bmo</author>
	<datestamp>1261842420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... that the plane landed in Havana, the hijacker got off the plane, and everyone went around their business or it landed in Tel-Aviv, the plane on the ground, and the hijackers shot/arrested with one or two dead passengers that the hijackers had killed to show they were "serious".  The passengers sat in their seats and waited it out.</p><p>Those were the days when hijackers could depend on the passivity of passengers.</p><p>With planes being flown into buildings, passengers are no longer passive.  It's not the TSA that keeps planes safe, it's the passengers and crew that will beat the snot out of the latest Al-Q "martyr."</p><p>--<br>BMO</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... that the plane landed in Havana , the hijacker got off the plane , and everyone went around their business or it landed in Tel-Aviv , the plane on the ground , and the hijackers shot/arrested with one or two dead passengers that the hijackers had killed to show they were " serious " .
The passengers sat in their seats and waited it out.Those were the days when hijackers could depend on the passivity of passengers.With planes being flown into buildings , passengers are no longer passive .
It 's not the TSA that keeps planes safe , it 's the passengers and crew that will beat the snot out of the latest Al-Q " martyr .
" --BMO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that the plane landed in Havana, the hijacker got off the plane, and everyone went around their business or it landed in Tel-Aviv, the plane on the ground, and the hijackers shot/arrested with one or two dead passengers that the hijackers had killed to show they were "serious".
The passengers sat in their seats and waited it out.Those were the days when hijackers could depend on the passivity of passengers.With planes being flown into buildings, passengers are no longer passive.
It's not the TSA that keeps planes safe, it's the passengers and crew that will beat the snot out of the latest Al-Q "martyr.
"--BMO</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700</id>
	<title>Should read</title>
	<author>amightywind</author>
	<datestamp>1261842420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Should read, "another muslim terror clown ignites himself in attempt to bomb airplane." Why isn't the TSA strip searching muslim males coming into the US?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should read , " another muslim terror clown ignites himself in attempt to bomb airplane .
" Why is n't the TSA strip searching muslim males coming into the US ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Should read, "another muslim terror clown ignites himself in attempt to bomb airplane.
" Why isn't the TSA strip searching muslim males coming into the US?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555680</id>
	<title>Our service today...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261842360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Our service today includes a light snack, complimentary beverages and a weenie roast in coach class.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Our service today includes a light snack , complimentary beverages and a weenie roast in coach class .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our service today includes a light snack, complimentary beverages and a weenie roast in coach class.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560114</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261839960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please, don't give them ideas!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , do n't give them ideas !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, don't give them ideas!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560124</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261840140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>um, typical al-qaeda attack involves two. The second attack always occurs 15 mins later to fuk over everyone that came to help. See 9/11 or London train bombings.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>um , typical al-qaeda attack involves two .
The second attack always occurs 15 mins later to fuk over everyone that came to help .
See 9/11 or London train bombings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>um, typical al-qaeda attack involves two.
The second attack always occurs 15 mins later to fuk over everyone that came to help.
See 9/11 or London train bombings.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261843440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why isn't the TSA strip searching Muslim males? That's easy:<br>1. They couldn't identify which men are Muslim or not. It's not like there's a big sign written on each Muslim saying "I am a Muslim" (and if there were, a reasonably smart terrorist wouldn't wear it when they went to bomb a plane).</p><p>2. The First Amendment of the Constitution protects the free exercise of religion, Islam included. Treating members of a particular faith as second-class citizens would definitely violate that. And yes, there are Muslims citizens of the US, some of them currently serving the country in Iraq and Afghanistan, who are more loyal to the US and what it stands for than you are.</p><p>3. At least 99.9\% of Muslim men aren't terrorists. You're arguing for strip searching about 800 million people in order to find a few thousand people. Your odds are only slightly better than strip searching the 99.99\% of Christian men who aren't terrorists to find the 0.01\% who are (e.g. Tim McVeigh or members of the Real IRA).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is n't the TSA strip searching Muslim males ?
That 's easy : 1 .
They could n't identify which men are Muslim or not .
It 's not like there 's a big sign written on each Muslim saying " I am a Muslim " ( and if there were , a reasonably smart terrorist would n't wear it when they went to bomb a plane ) .2 .
The First Amendment of the Constitution protects the free exercise of religion , Islam included .
Treating members of a particular faith as second-class citizens would definitely violate that .
And yes , there are Muslims citizens of the US , some of them currently serving the country in Iraq and Afghanistan , who are more loyal to the US and what it stands for than you are.3 .
At least 99.9 \ % of Muslim men are n't terrorists .
You 're arguing for strip searching about 800 million people in order to find a few thousand people .
Your odds are only slightly better than strip searching the 99.99 \ % of Christian men who are n't terrorists to find the 0.01 \ % who are ( e.g .
Tim McVeigh or members of the Real IRA ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why isn't the TSA strip searching Muslim males?
That's easy:1.
They couldn't identify which men are Muslim or not.
It's not like there's a big sign written on each Muslim saying "I am a Muslim" (and if there were, a reasonably smart terrorist wouldn't wear it when they went to bomb a plane).2.
The First Amendment of the Constitution protects the free exercise of religion, Islam included.
Treating members of a particular faith as second-class citizens would definitely violate that.
And yes, there are Muslims citizens of the US, some of them currently serving the country in Iraq and Afghanistan, who are more loyal to the US and what it stands for than you are.3.
At least 99.9\% of Muslim men aren't terrorists.
You're arguing for strip searching about 800 million people in order to find a few thousand people.
Your odds are only slightly better than strip searching the 99.99\% of Christian men who aren't terrorists to find the 0.01\% who are (e.g.
Tim McVeigh or members of the Real IRA).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555802</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>buchner.johannes</author>
	<datestamp>1261843500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Should read, "another muslim terror clown ignites himself in attempt to bomb airplane." Why isn't the TSA strip searching muslim males coming into the US?</p></div><p>Because that would violate the human rights twice. Terrorists and suspected Terrorists are humans.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should read , " another muslim terror clown ignites himself in attempt to bomb airplane .
" Why is n't the TSA strip searching muslim males coming into the US ? Because that would violate the human rights twice .
Terrorists and suspected Terrorists are humans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Should read, "another muslim terror clown ignites himself in attempt to bomb airplane.
" Why isn't the TSA strip searching muslim males coming into the US?Because that would violate the human rights twice.
Terrorists and suspected Terrorists are humans.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556758</id>
	<title>It's glycerin, actually.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261852020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; My blogger buddy remembered something I forgot, there is a way to ignite thermite with a liquid (potassium permanganate and glycerol? sorry for forgetting), but no idea what this was yet.</p><p>Glycerin, actually.  You need to have them in proper proportions, though, or they fizzle.  Potassium permanganate is used to treat expensive fish, like Koi, for some diseases.  Glycerin is available at any pharmacy, so it's very possible, though I have absolutely no more idea what this was than anyone else.  And the thermite reaction IS a way to create a powerful fire with only a few solid materials and a tiny bit of liquid (though there are plenty of other ways to start the reaction that don't involve liquids at all).  That said... just what would the thermite do?  Even if it melted through the plane (which is barely plausible, but which might be possible), it wouldn't cause a crash.  And they have fire extinguishers that are, per the story, quite capable of extinguishing whatever fire he started.  I know all this because I had a very nice chemistry teacher a long time ago.  We did this reaction and he let me experiment with glycerin and potassium permanganate.  It's sad to think that future chemistry teachers might not be given the leeway to show their students cool reactions like this, but given the mistrust these incidents breed...  I can only wonder sometimes if that's their real goal.</p><p>Anyhow, I have to agree that angry passengers are the most effective security measure.  Maybe that's why all the new rules seem designed to piss ordinary people off before they get on the plane?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; My blogger buddy remembered something I forgot , there is a way to ignite thermite with a liquid ( potassium permanganate and glycerol ?
sorry for forgetting ) , but no idea what this was yet.Glycerin , actually .
You need to have them in proper proportions , though , or they fizzle .
Potassium permanganate is used to treat expensive fish , like Koi , for some diseases .
Glycerin is available at any pharmacy , so it 's very possible , though I have absolutely no more idea what this was than anyone else .
And the thermite reaction IS a way to create a powerful fire with only a few solid materials and a tiny bit of liquid ( though there are plenty of other ways to start the reaction that do n't involve liquids at all ) .
That said... just what would the thermite do ?
Even if it melted through the plane ( which is barely plausible , but which might be possible ) , it would n't cause a crash .
And they have fire extinguishers that are , per the story , quite capable of extinguishing whatever fire he started .
I know all this because I had a very nice chemistry teacher a long time ago .
We did this reaction and he let me experiment with glycerin and potassium permanganate .
It 's sad to think that future chemistry teachers might not be given the leeway to show their students cool reactions like this , but given the mistrust these incidents breed... I can only wonder sometimes if that 's their real goal.Anyhow , I have to agree that angry passengers are the most effective security measure .
Maybe that 's why all the new rules seem designed to piss ordinary people off before they get on the plane ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; My blogger buddy remembered something I forgot, there is a way to ignite thermite with a liquid (potassium permanganate and glycerol?
sorry for forgetting), but no idea what this was yet.Glycerin, actually.
You need to have them in proper proportions, though, or they fizzle.
Potassium permanganate is used to treat expensive fish, like Koi, for some diseases.
Glycerin is available at any pharmacy, so it's very possible, though I have absolutely no more idea what this was than anyone else.
And the thermite reaction IS a way to create a powerful fire with only a few solid materials and a tiny bit of liquid (though there are plenty of other ways to start the reaction that don't involve liquids at all).
That said... just what would the thermite do?
Even if it melted through the plane (which is barely plausible, but which might be possible), it wouldn't cause a crash.
And they have fire extinguishers that are, per the story, quite capable of extinguishing whatever fire he started.
I know all this because I had a very nice chemistry teacher a long time ago.
We did this reaction and he let me experiment with glycerin and potassium permanganate.
It's sad to think that future chemistry teachers might not be given the leeway to show their students cool reactions like this, but given the mistrust these incidents breed...  I can only wonder sometimes if that's their real goal.Anyhow, I have to agree that angry passengers are the most effective security measure.
Maybe that's why all the new rules seem designed to piss ordinary people off before they get on the plane?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556258</id>
	<title>New Plan:</title>
	<author>mmalove</author>
	<datestamp>1261847460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Offer two kinds of flights.</p><p>1.  Passengers are babied all to hell: no sharp objects, no guns, nothing remotely close to looking like an explosive.  Stick an air marshall or two on board to keep the peace or prevent some kung fu Al Qeada guy from stealing the plane.</p><p>2.  F-all: let the passengers carry on board their guns, toothpaste, and laptops.  Inform them ahead of time that the airplane will be equiped with a fail safe that can be remote detonated if the plane becomes hijacked and on board personel are unable to regain control.</p><p>2+: Get 20 Al Qeada cells to simultaneously hijack the same plane, and be sure to youtube it before detonating the device in 2.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Offer two kinds of flights.1 .
Passengers are babied all to hell : no sharp objects , no guns , nothing remotely close to looking like an explosive .
Stick an air marshall or two on board to keep the peace or prevent some kung fu Al Qeada guy from stealing the plane.2 .
F-all : let the passengers carry on board their guns , toothpaste , and laptops .
Inform them ahead of time that the airplane will be equiped with a fail safe that can be remote detonated if the plane becomes hijacked and on board personel are unable to regain control.2 + : Get 20 Al Qeada cells to simultaneously hijack the same plane , and be sure to youtube it before detonating the device in 2 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Offer two kinds of flights.1.
Passengers are babied all to hell: no sharp objects, no guns, nothing remotely close to looking like an explosive.
Stick an air marshall or two on board to keep the peace or prevent some kung fu Al Qeada guy from stealing the plane.2.
F-all: let the passengers carry on board their guns, toothpaste, and laptops.
Inform them ahead of time that the airplane will be equiped with a fail safe that can be remote detonated if the plane becomes hijacked and on board personel are unable to regain control.2+: Get 20 Al Qeada cells to simultaneously hijack the same plane, and be sure to youtube it before detonating the device in 2.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556254</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>noisyinstrument</author>
	<datestamp>1261847460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And this flight didn't originate in the US. The TSA is a US domestic organisation, so they have to rely on the departing countries security measures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And this flight did n't originate in the US .
The TSA is a US domestic organisation , so they have to rely on the departing countries security measures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And this flight didn't originate in the US.
The TSA is a US domestic organisation, so they have to rely on the departing countries security measures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555964</id>
	<title>Yet Another Exploding iPhone.</title>
	<author>Muskstick</author>
	<datestamp>1261845000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought Apple had fixed this problem?</p><p>Bet this guy wishes he'd bought an Android.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought Apple had fixed this problem ? Bet this guy wishes he 'd bought an Android .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought Apple had fixed this problem?Bet this guy wishes he'd bought an Android.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555826</id>
	<title>Re:Probable Translation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261843740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was how the first reports were like. That it has no Al'Kaeda connection, and that he just claimed that.</p><p>Now the White House confirmed that it was a terror incident, but I'm not sure what new evidence they base that on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was how the first reports were like .
That it has no Al'Kaeda connection , and that he just claimed that.Now the White House confirmed that it was a terror incident , but I 'm not sure what new evidence they base that on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was how the first reports were like.
That it has no Al'Kaeda connection, and that he just claimed that.Now the White House confirmed that it was a terror incident, but I'm not sure what new evidence they base that on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30562266</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>roman\_mir</author>
	<datestamp>1261915320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So no vegetarians will be flying then I suppose?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So no vegetarians will be flying then I suppose ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So no vegetarians will be flying then I suppose?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556768</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261852080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>In fact, in recent tests, a National Lab was asked to formulate a test mixture and it took several tries using the best equipment and best scientists for it to even ignite. That was with a bomb prepared in advance in a lab setting. A less skilled person attempting to put it together inside a secure area or a plane is not a good bet.</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>"Best equipment" and "best scientists" couldn't get it to blow up without several tries?  Sorry, I can't really give that too much credence.  They probably don't make explosives every day and are also probably a bit over concerned with making it more boomy than anticipated.</p><p>Amateurs playing with recipes for boomy stuffs often wind up being quite successful and are missing miscellaneous extremities to prove it.</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>That's right -the TSA has admitted that binary explosives are essentially impossible to pull off, and yet they still insist on on the totally pointless liquid restrictions.</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>What if this is a nugget of misinformation?</p><p>essentially impossible to pull off<br>+ Still insist on totally "pointless" liquid restrictions<br>= WTF are the restrictions for</p><p>versus</p><p>quite feasible to pull off<br>+ Still insist on totally "pointless" liquid restrictions<br>= holy shit don't let them know it can work</p><p>Which makes more sense?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact , in recent tests , a National Lab was asked to formulate a test mixture and it took several tries using the best equipment and best scientists for it to even ignite .
That was with a bomb prepared in advance in a lab setting .
A less skilled person attempting to put it together inside a secure area or a plane is not a good bet .
" Best equipment " and " best scientists " could n't get it to blow up without several tries ?
Sorry , I ca n't really give that too much credence .
They probably do n't make explosives every day and are also probably a bit over concerned with making it more boomy than anticipated.Amateurs playing with recipes for boomy stuffs often wind up being quite successful and are missing miscellaneous extremities to prove it .
That 's right -the TSA has admitted that binary explosives are essentially impossible to pull off , and yet they still insist on on the totally pointless liquid restrictions .
What if this is a nugget of misinformation ? essentially impossible to pull off + Still insist on totally " pointless " liquid restrictions = WTF are the restrictions forversusquite feasible to pull off + Still insist on totally " pointless " liquid restrictions = holy shit do n't let them know it can workWhich makes more sense ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> In fact, in recent tests, a National Lab was asked to formulate a test mixture and it took several tries using the best equipment and best scientists for it to even ignite.
That was with a bomb prepared in advance in a lab setting.
A less skilled person attempting to put it together inside a secure area or a plane is not a good bet.
"Best equipment" and "best scientists" couldn't get it to blow up without several tries?
Sorry, I can't really give that too much credence.
They probably don't make explosives every day and are also probably a bit over concerned with making it more boomy than anticipated.Amateurs playing with recipes for boomy stuffs often wind up being quite successful and are missing miscellaneous extremities to prove it.
That's right -the TSA has admitted that binary explosives are essentially impossible to pull off, and yet they still insist on on the totally pointless liquid restrictions.
What if this is a nugget of misinformation?essentially impossible to pull off+ Still insist on totally "pointless" liquid restrictions= WTF are the restrictions forversusquite feasible to pull off+ Still insist on totally "pointless" liquid restrictions= holy shit don't let them know it can workWhich makes more sense?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556574</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1261850340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE. i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky.</p></div></blockquote><p>

That's what separates us from them.<br> <br>

We'll give the guy a trial, a fair trial (well if it wasn't in the US), we sure as hell don't know his motives, he could be with a terrorist organisation, he could simply be a loner out for attention and everywhere in between (which is why he deserves a fair trial).<br> <br>

You may be so scared as to kill someone on a suspicion but most of us are not. Personally I'd rather find out the truth, <b>even</b> if this guy's with a terrorist org we can find out more useful info from a prisoner then a corpse. Remember that modern terrorist MO is that the attacker dies, I have no doubt that a live one leaves them with all kinds of vulnerabilities.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE .
i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky .
That 's what separates us from them .
We 'll give the guy a trial , a fair trial ( well if it was n't in the US ) , we sure as hell do n't know his motives , he could be with a terrorist organisation , he could simply be a loner out for attention and everywhere in between ( which is why he deserves a fair trial ) .
You may be so scared as to kill someone on a suspicion but most of us are not .
Personally I 'd rather find out the truth , even if this guy 's with a terrorist org we can find out more useful info from a prisoner then a corpse .
Remember that modern terrorist MO is that the attacker dies , I have no doubt that a live one leaves them with all kinds of vulnerabilities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE.
i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky.
That's what separates us from them.
We'll give the guy a trial, a fair trial (well if it wasn't in the US), we sure as hell don't know his motives, he could be with a terrorist organisation, he could simply be a loner out for attention and everywhere in between (which is why he deserves a fair trial).
You may be so scared as to kill someone on a suspicion but most of us are not.
Personally I'd rather find out the truth, even if this guy's with a terrorist org we can find out more useful info from a prisoner then a corpse.
Remember that modern terrorist MO is that the attacker dies, I have no doubt that a live one leaves them with all kinds of vulnerabilities.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556016</id>
	<title>no wonder it was foiled....</title>
	<author>adosch</author>
	<datestamp>1261845420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If having a passenger with the last name "Seagal" on your plane doesn't foil something of a terrorist-type attack like this... then what will?  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven\_Seagal" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Steven Seagal</a> [wikipedia.org] has been busting up terrorist plots left and right with little effort all throughout the late 80's and 90's.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If having a passenger with the last name " Seagal " on your plane does n't foil something of a terrorist-type attack like this... then what will ?
Steven Seagal [ wikipedia.org ] has been busting up terrorist plots left and right with little effort all throughout the late 80 's and 90 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If having a passenger with the last name "Seagal" on your plane doesn't foil something of a terrorist-type attack like this... then what will?
Steven Seagal [wikipedia.org] has been busting up terrorist plots left and right with little effort all throughout the late 80's and 90's.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559674</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261833840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not fully accurate, quite a lot of very intelligent people are suicidal, just they tend to not be for a cause, but generic depression. But some depressed people who are planning to commit suicide anyways might have enough forsight to do it in such a manner that they can still be within their faith and still get into the VIP room (martydom), or do it to help move another agenda (such as self immolation at the capital house steps with a sign of protest for your belief... Now, bonus points for this one, because the stones it takes, and the "not taking innocent lives with you, tends to actually bring sympathy to whatever you believe, even support.)</p><p>
&nbsp; But then again, the few number of people that remain suicidal long enough, and otherwise "sane" enough, to do such a thing are very rare on the suicide scale...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not fully accurate , quite a lot of very intelligent people are suicidal , just they tend to not be for a cause , but generic depression .
But some depressed people who are planning to commit suicide anyways might have enough forsight to do it in such a manner that they can still be within their faith and still get into the VIP room ( martydom ) , or do it to help move another agenda ( such as self immolation at the capital house steps with a sign of protest for your belief... Now , bonus points for this one , because the stones it takes , and the " not taking innocent lives with you , tends to actually bring sympathy to whatever you believe , even support .
)   But then again , the few number of people that remain suicidal long enough , and otherwise " sane " enough , to do such a thing are very rare on the suicide scale.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not fully accurate, quite a lot of very intelligent people are suicidal, just they tend to not be for a cause, but generic depression.
But some depressed people who are planning to commit suicide anyways might have enough forsight to do it in such a manner that they can still be within their faith and still get into the VIP room (martydom), or do it to help move another agenda (such as self immolation at the capital house steps with a sign of protest for your belief... Now, bonus points for this one, because the stones it takes, and the "not taking innocent lives with you, tends to actually bring sympathy to whatever you believe, even support.
)
  But then again, the few number of people that remain suicidal long enough, and otherwise "sane" enough, to do such a thing are very rare on the suicide scale...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557732</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anspen</author>
	<datestamp>1261860300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always wondered if the Cole bombing should be considered a terrorist attack. On the one hand the target was a legitimate military target on the other the goal certainly wasn't to reduce the capacity of the US navy, it was to strike fear.</p><p>(somewhat beside the point of the GP but I'm curious what the arguments are)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always wondered if the Cole bombing should be considered a terrorist attack .
On the one hand the target was a legitimate military target on the other the goal certainly was n't to reduce the capacity of the US navy , it was to strike fear .
( somewhat beside the point of the GP but I 'm curious what the arguments are )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always wondered if the Cole bombing should be considered a terrorist attack.
On the one hand the target was a legitimate military target on the other the goal certainly wasn't to reduce the capacity of the US navy, it was to strike fear.
(somewhat beside the point of the GP but I'm curious what the arguments are)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556820</id>
	<title>Re:This attack was perfectly succesful</title>
	<author>rainsford</author>
	<datestamp>1261852500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't forget the millions of Americans who will be even more likely to treat every Muslim, or every person who conforms to Muslim stereotypes, as a terrorist.  There are tons of them commenting on this very story.  Far from seeing them as the enemy, terrorists must LOVE these folks.  It deepens the divide between Muslims and non-Muslims, even so far as to gain additional support for the terrorists.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget the millions of Americans who will be even more likely to treat every Muslim , or every person who conforms to Muslim stereotypes , as a terrorist .
There are tons of them commenting on this very story .
Far from seeing them as the enemy , terrorists must LOVE these folks .
It deepens the divide between Muslims and non-Muslims , even so far as to gain additional support for the terrorists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget the millions of Americans who will be even more likely to treat every Muslim, or every person who conforms to Muslim stereotypes, as a terrorist.
There are tons of them commenting on this very story.
Far from seeing them as the enemy, terrorists must LOVE these folks.
It deepens the divide between Muslims and non-Muslims, even so far as to gain additional support for the terrorists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30568970</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1262032800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Mandatory bacon sandwiches before boarding the plane. Everybody wins.</p></div><p>I realize this post is tongue-in-cheek, but for anyone taking the idea (and a slew of related ones) seriously, I'd like to refer them to the primary source:</p><p>Sura 2, Ayat 173 "Al-Baqara" ("The Cow"):</p><p>"He hath only forbidden you dead meat, and blood, and the flesh of swine, and that on which any other name hath been invoked besides that of Allah. <b>But if one is forced by necessity, without wilful disobedience, nor transgressing due limits,- then is he guiltless.</b> For Allah is Oft-forgiving Most Merciful."</p><p>How much the exception can be stretched is a matter of discussion, but I'd like to remind that suicide is strictly prohibited in Islam as well, yet suicide bombers are still there - they just weasel out of it by arguing that it's not really suicide proper, but just a "suicidal attack" (since throwing oneself at enemy swords, if that it advantageous to your cause, was never prohibited). These same people would likely consider the exception towards prohibition of pork to apply as well in these circumstances.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mandatory bacon sandwiches before boarding the plane .
Everybody wins.I realize this post is tongue-in-cheek , but for anyone taking the idea ( and a slew of related ones ) seriously , I 'd like to refer them to the primary source : Sura 2 , Ayat 173 " Al-Baqara " ( " The Cow " ) : " He hath only forbidden you dead meat , and blood , and the flesh of swine , and that on which any other name hath been invoked besides that of Allah .
But if one is forced by necessity , without wilful disobedience , nor transgressing due limits,- then is he guiltless .
For Allah is Oft-forgiving Most Merciful .
" How much the exception can be stretched is a matter of discussion , but I 'd like to remind that suicide is strictly prohibited in Islam as well , yet suicide bombers are still there - they just weasel out of it by arguing that it 's not really suicide proper , but just a " suicidal attack " ( since throwing oneself at enemy swords , if that it advantageous to your cause , was never prohibited ) .
These same people would likely consider the exception towards prohibition of pork to apply as well in these circumstances .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mandatory bacon sandwiches before boarding the plane.
Everybody wins.I realize this post is tongue-in-cheek, but for anyone taking the idea (and a slew of related ones) seriously, I'd like to refer them to the primary source:Sura 2, Ayat 173 "Al-Baqara" ("The Cow"):"He hath only forbidden you dead meat, and blood, and the flesh of swine, and that on which any other name hath been invoked besides that of Allah.
But if one is forced by necessity, without wilful disobedience, nor transgressing due limits,- then is he guiltless.
For Allah is Oft-forgiving Most Merciful.
"How much the exception can be stretched is a matter of discussion, but I'd like to remind that suicide is strictly prohibited in Islam as well, yet suicide bombers are still there - they just weasel out of it by arguing that it's not really suicide proper, but just a "suicidal attack" (since throwing oneself at enemy swords, if that it advantageous to your cause, was never prohibited).
These same people would likely consider the exception towards prohibition of pork to apply as well in these circumstances.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557222</id>
	<title>Too bad</title>
	<author>failedlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1261856100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One more nut job that's allowed to live. I'm not sure others would have been so forgiving if they had the chance with that guy. Al-Queda, nutjob or otherwise.</p><p>And WTF, I'd have at least expected air marshalls would be on the flight, especially as one would expect them to be on the holidays.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One more nut job that 's allowed to live .
I 'm not sure others would have been so forgiving if they had the chance with that guy .
Al-Queda , nutjob or otherwise.And WTF , I 'd have at least expected air marshalls would be on the flight , especially as one would expect them to be on the holidays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One more nut job that's allowed to live.
I'm not sure others would have been so forgiving if they had the chance with that guy.
Al-Queda, nutjob or otherwise.And WTF, I'd have at least expected air marshalls would be on the flight, especially as one would expect them to be on the holidays.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556368</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>ommerson</author>
	<datestamp>1261848540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm convinced that one of the major factors preventing more terrorism outrages is the incompetence of most of the terrorists.</p><p>A case in point is the doctor who was involved in the Glasgow Airport and London attacks a few years ago.   I'd imagine that basic chemistry is something that a doctors would have got to grips with as a medical student. Clearly not in this case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm convinced that one of the major factors preventing more terrorism outrages is the incompetence of most of the terrorists.A case in point is the doctor who was involved in the Glasgow Airport and London attacks a few years ago .
I 'd imagine that basic chemistry is something that a doctors would have got to grips with as a medical student .
Clearly not in this case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm convinced that one of the major factors preventing more terrorism outrages is the incompetence of most of the terrorists.A case in point is the doctor who was involved in the Glasgow Airport and London attacks a few years ago.
I'd imagine that basic chemistry is something that a doctors would have got to grips with as a medical student.
Clearly not in this case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>St.Creed</author>
	<datestamp>1261844280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The perpetrator is claiming he received the explosives from Al-Qaeda in Jemen. He did visit Jemen before boarding this flight, so that is quite likely the source.</p><p>Also, it was a binary explosive: he was trying to inject liquid chemicals into solid chemicals strapped to his legs. They exploded mildly, but mostly set him on fire - that was were the bang and fire came from. Right then a Dutch passenger jumped over a few chairs and subdued him. Although I've read reports that the terrorist was "sitting dazed in his chair" - he'd probably expected to die right there, and when he didn't he was in shock.</p><p>Binary explosives are a bit hard to mix and if you don't get it right, you don't get a big bang. Also, it looks like there was no containing vessel so the bang could have been like gunpowder in the open: a big flash but apart from that, nothing much.</p><p>I'm wondering that kind of chemicals they were using though, because he was checked by security and nothing showed up on the scanners. He probably had the nitrogen-rich stuff strapped to his legs and harmless-looking stuff in his handluggage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The perpetrator is claiming he received the explosives from Al-Qaeda in Jemen .
He did visit Jemen before boarding this flight , so that is quite likely the source.Also , it was a binary explosive : he was trying to inject liquid chemicals into solid chemicals strapped to his legs .
They exploded mildly , but mostly set him on fire - that was were the bang and fire came from .
Right then a Dutch passenger jumped over a few chairs and subdued him .
Although I 've read reports that the terrorist was " sitting dazed in his chair " - he 'd probably expected to die right there , and when he did n't he was in shock.Binary explosives are a bit hard to mix and if you do n't get it right , you do n't get a big bang .
Also , it looks like there was no containing vessel so the bang could have been like gunpowder in the open : a big flash but apart from that , nothing much.I 'm wondering that kind of chemicals they were using though , because he was checked by security and nothing showed up on the scanners .
He probably had the nitrogen-rich stuff strapped to his legs and harmless-looking stuff in his handluggage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The perpetrator is claiming he received the explosives from Al-Qaeda in Jemen.
He did visit Jemen before boarding this flight, so that is quite likely the source.Also, it was a binary explosive: he was trying to inject liquid chemicals into solid chemicals strapped to his legs.
They exploded mildly, but mostly set him on fire - that was were the bang and fire came from.
Right then a Dutch passenger jumped over a few chairs and subdued him.
Although I've read reports that the terrorist was "sitting dazed in his chair" - he'd probably expected to die right there, and when he didn't he was in shock.Binary explosives are a bit hard to mix and if you don't get it right, you don't get a big bang.
Also, it looks like there was no containing vessel so the bang could have been like gunpowder in the open: a big flash but apart from that, nothing much.I'm wondering that kind of chemicals they were using though, because he was checked by security and nothing showed up on the scanners.
He probably had the nitrogen-rich stuff strapped to his legs and harmless-looking stuff in his handluggage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556036</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261845540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, you wouldn't have to strip search 800 million.  Most of them can't afford to fly because almost all Muslim-majority countries are fairly poor (Especially by Western Standards) and couldn't afford to fly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , you would n't have to strip search 800 million .
Most of them ca n't afford to fly because almost all Muslim-majority countries are fairly poor ( Especially by Western Standards ) and could n't afford to fly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, you wouldn't have to strip search 800 million.
Most of them can't afford to fly because almost all Muslim-majority countries are fairly poor (Especially by Western Standards) and couldn't afford to fly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558760</id>
	<title>Re:Fucking douchebag</title>
	<author>TheGratefulNet</author>
	<datestamp>1261825080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no it won't.  he took bush's place in every respect.  NO power that he inherited will ever be given back.  are you nuts or just not listening?</p><p>obama was the quickest headspin in history.  so much hope, so much IMMEDIATE about-face lying.</p><p>what a sham.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no it wo n't .
he took bush 's place in every respect .
NO power that he inherited will ever be given back .
are you nuts or just not listening ? obama was the quickest headspin in history .
so much hope , so much IMMEDIATE about-face lying.what a sham .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no it won't.
he took bush's place in every respect.
NO power that he inherited will ever be given back.
are you nuts or just not listening?obama was the quickest headspin in history.
so much hope, so much IMMEDIATE about-face lying.what a sham.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558226</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261820640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The security agencies need to be lucky all the time, the terrorists need to be lucky just the once...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The security agencies need to be lucky all the time , the terrorists need to be lucky just the once.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The security agencies need to be lucky all the time, the terrorists need to be lucky just the once...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557996</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261819140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lol, your idea of having all passengers in a coma is modded insightful.  I love this site!  =)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lol , your idea of having all passengers in a coma is modded insightful .
I love this site !
= )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lol, your idea of having all passengers in a coma is modded insightful.
I love this site!
=)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30562114</id>
	<title>Re:Our service today...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261912560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's african, so better make that a <i>dong</i> roast.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's african , so better make that a dong roast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's african, so better make that a dong roast.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558962</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Thing 1</author>
	<datestamp>1261826640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Those rights were pretty hard to get. The elite at the formation of the United states were so set against given the dirty masses any rights that the only way to get them in was as amendments. Think about that [...]</p></div>
</blockquote><p>I <b>have</b> thought about that, and came to the conclusion that you don't know your US history very well.</p><p>All rights not given to the federal government in the constitution (and bill of rights, and amendments) are reserved by the states.  In other words: our founding documents <b>absolutely do not</b> list the rights that the people have.  They list the rights that the <b>government</b> has.  The people have all the other rights not listed.  So, yes, you have a "right" to free travel, because our founding documents do not state that the government has a "right" to restrict its citizens' travel.  We should absolutely not have to show papers to travel, and it's an important point that you brought up because most people here in the US just blindly accept that they need to carry documentation with them.</p><p>If you read them clearly, those amendments given the government more power ("rights"), not the people.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those rights were pretty hard to get .
The elite at the formation of the United states were so set against given the dirty masses any rights that the only way to get them in was as amendments .
Think about that [ ... ] I have thought about that , and came to the conclusion that you do n't know your US history very well.All rights not given to the federal government in the constitution ( and bill of rights , and amendments ) are reserved by the states .
In other words : our founding documents absolutely do not list the rights that the people have .
They list the rights that the government has .
The people have all the other rights not listed .
So , yes , you have a " right " to free travel , because our founding documents do not state that the government has a " right " to restrict its citizens ' travel .
We should absolutely not have to show papers to travel , and it 's an important point that you brought up because most people here in the US just blindly accept that they need to carry documentation with them.If you read them clearly , those amendments given the government more power ( " rights " ) , not the people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those rights were pretty hard to get.
The elite at the formation of the United states were so set against given the dirty masses any rights that the only way to get them in was as amendments.
Think about that [...]
I have thought about that, and came to the conclusion that you don't know your US history very well.All rights not given to the federal government in the constitution (and bill of rights, and amendments) are reserved by the states.
In other words: our founding documents absolutely do not list the rights that the people have.
They list the rights that the government has.
The people have all the other rights not listed.
So, yes, you have a "right" to free travel, because our founding documents do not state that the government has a "right" to restrict its citizens' travel.
We should absolutely not have to show papers to travel, and it's an important point that you brought up because most people here in the US just blindly accept that they need to carry documentation with them.If you read them clearly, those amendments given the government more power ("rights"), not the people.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557336</id>
	<title>Omelette</title>
	<author>greyhueofdoubt</author>
	<datestamp>1261856880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Read this:</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/faq/editorial.shtml#ed900" title="slashdot.org">http://slashdot.org/faq/editorial.shtml#ed900</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>If you still have questions, read it again. And have a nice day.</p><p>-b</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Read this : http : //slashdot.org/faq/editorial.shtml # ed900 [ slashdot.org ] If you still have questions , read it again .
And have a nice day.-b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read this:http://slashdot.org/faq/editorial.shtml#ed900 [slashdot.org]If you still have questions, read it again.
And have a nice day.-b</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560310</id>
	<title>Re:This attack was perfectly succesful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261843260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>this is the land of FOX</i>
<br> <br>
Ah. Well. that explains the breathless reporting by media everywhere from Belgium to the Netherlands to all of the anti-Fox-es like the NY Times, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, NPR, and the rest.
<br> <br>
Or, just maybe the fact that a well-educated, financially well-off man who had embraced radical jihadism and - however clumsily - made the decision and took actions to kill a plane load of people and bring its wreckage down onto a US city<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... maybe that's worth noting? Maybe we don't have to be "afraid" of him to want to prevent it from happening? I'm not quaking in fear or a house fire, but take steps to prevent them anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>this is the land of FOX Ah .
Well. that explains the breathless reporting by media everywhere from Belgium to the Netherlands to all of the anti-Fox-es like the NY Times , CNN , ABC , NBC , CBS , NPR , and the rest .
Or , just maybe the fact that a well-educated , financially well-off man who had embraced radical jihadism and - however clumsily - made the decision and took actions to kill a plane load of people and bring its wreckage down onto a US city ... maybe that 's worth noting ?
Maybe we do n't have to be " afraid " of him to want to prevent it from happening ?
I 'm not quaking in fear or a house fire , but take steps to prevent them anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is the land of FOX
 
Ah.
Well. that explains the breathless reporting by media everywhere from Belgium to the Netherlands to all of the anti-Fox-es like the NY Times, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, NPR, and the rest.
Or, just maybe the fact that a well-educated, financially well-off man who had embraced radical jihadism and - however clumsily - made the decision and took actions to kill a plane load of people and bring its wreckage down onto a US city ... maybe that's worth noting?
Maybe we don't have to be "afraid" of him to want to prevent it from happening?
I'm not quaking in fear or a house fire, but take steps to prevent them anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561898</id>
	<title>Saw a Frank Caliendo video recently</title>
	<author>Artifex</author>
	<datestamp>1261909620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now his impression of Al Pacino keeps running through my head: "liar liar... pants on FIRE!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now his impression of Al Pacino keeps running through my head : " liar liar... pants on FIRE !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now his impression of Al Pacino keeps running through my head: "liar liar... pants on FIRE!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560334</id>
	<title>Ban islamos from planes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261843680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the solution is extremely simple, ban anyone with an islamic sounding name from ever boarding any plane, no matter if he is the king of Saudi Arabia, no islamos on board, no more terrorists in the air.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the solution is extremely simple , ban anyone with an islamic sounding name from ever boarding any plane , no matter if he is the king of Saudi Arabia , no islamos on board , no more terrorists in the air .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the solution is extremely simple, ban anyone with an islamic sounding name from ever boarding any plane, no matter if he is the king of Saudi Arabia, no islamos on board, no more terrorists in the air.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30566924</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful</title>
	<author>RobertM1968</author>
	<datestamp>1261920300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I need a new wardrobe anyway... at least frequent flyer miles will now also earn people some extra threads... nowadays, they aren't worth much more. Nowadays, it seems you need two trillion frequent flyer points just to pay for the taxi'ing part of the flight.

</p><p>Maybe they should have a rewards catalog, like they did for the cigarette promotions of yesteryear... win a free ashtray with 30,000 points... get a neat jacket for 100,000... fly from JFK to LaGuardia for 2,000,000... you know... something like that so that regular fliers can actually get something out of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I need a new wardrobe anyway... at least frequent flyer miles will now also earn people some extra threads... nowadays , they are n't worth much more .
Nowadays , it seems you need two trillion frequent flyer points just to pay for the taxi'ing part of the flight .
Maybe they should have a rewards catalog , like they did for the cigarette promotions of yesteryear... win a free ashtray with 30,000 points... get a neat jacket for 100,000... fly from JFK to LaGuardia for 2,000,000... you know... something like that so that regular fliers can actually get something out of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I need a new wardrobe anyway... at least frequent flyer miles will now also earn people some extra threads... nowadays, they aren't worth much more.
Nowadays, it seems you need two trillion frequent flyer points just to pay for the taxi'ing part of the flight.
Maybe they should have a rewards catalog, like they did for the cigarette promotions of yesteryear... win a free ashtray with 30,000 points... get a neat jacket for 100,000... fly from JFK to LaGuardia for 2,000,000... you know... something like that so that regular fliers can actually get something out of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555868</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Martin Blank</author>
	<datestamp>1261844040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Suicide bombers believe that all sins of martyrs will be forgiven.  They can do pretty much what they want before carrying out the act.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Suicide bombers believe that all sins of martyrs will be forgiven .
They can do pretty much what they want before carrying out the act .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Suicide bombers believe that all sins of martyrs will be forgiven.
They can do pretty much what they want before carrying out the act.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556938</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261853460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE. i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the sky</i></p><p>Are you kidding?  Capturing this guy alive will give us the opportunity to torture him and get more useful information than simply executing him immediately.  Hopefully our government will ship him off to guantanamo and pull his fingernails out before executing him, although with Obama in charge he will probably be given a lolipop and released, as all liberals are want to do with terrorists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE .
i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the skyAre you kidding ?
Capturing this guy alive will give us the opportunity to torture him and get more useful information than simply executing him immediately .
Hopefully our government will ship him off to guantanamo and pull his fingernails out before executing him , although with Obama in charge he will probably be given a lolipop and released , as all liberals are want to do with terrorists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what has me is how this guy was allowed to land ALIVE.
i for one will not take prisoners when somebody trys to blow me up in the skyAre you kidding?
Capturing this guy alive will give us the opportunity to torture him and get more useful information than simply executing him immediately.
Hopefully our government will ship him off to guantanamo and pull his fingernails out before executing him, although with Obama in charge he will probably be given a lolipop and released, as all liberals are want to do with terrorists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555686</id>
	<title>First class...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261842360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow!  And all these years, I've not had the thousands US$ to pay to upgrade to first class and all it took was a dadgum 4th of July firecracker!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow !
And all these years , I 've not had the thousands US $ to pay to upgrade to first class and all it took was a dadgum 4th of July firecracker !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow!
And all these years, I've not had the thousands US$ to pay to upgrade to first class and all it took was a dadgum 4th of July firecracker!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560038</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>mrphoton</author>
	<datestamp>1261838940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>fantastic! you are a genius.  However I think I can improve on it.  Mandatory bacon sandwiches \_and a free beer\_ before boarding the plane. Everybody wins.</htmltext>
<tokenext>fantastic !
you are a genius .
However I think I can improve on it .
Mandatory bacon sandwiches \ _and a free beer \ _ before boarding the plane .
Everybody wins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fantastic!
you are a genius.
However I think I can improve on it.
Mandatory bacon sandwiches \_and a free beer\_ before boarding the plane.
Everybody wins.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557026</id>
	<title>was it a nigerian prince?</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1261854120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, people need to quit giving money to Nigerians princes so they can't afford this sort of crap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , people need to quit giving money to Nigerians princes so they ca n't afford this sort of crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, people need to quit giving money to Nigerians princes so they can't afford this sort of crap.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556464</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261849320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Al-Qaeda (The Base) is supposedly an international terrorist network, organized as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clandestine\_cell\_system" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">clandestine cells</a> [wikipedia.org]. Not all groups have the same size, so this one could be a small group with only one guy willing to volunteer, or they only had enough money to send him. Clearly this did not have the same amount of funding or manpower as the 9/11 attacks, but does not mean it is not Al-Qaeda.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Al-Qaeda ( The Base ) is supposedly an international terrorist network , organized as clandestine cells [ wikipedia.org ] .
Not all groups have the same size , so this one could be a small group with only one guy willing to volunteer , or they only had enough money to send him .
Clearly this did not have the same amount of funding or manpower as the 9/11 attacks , but does not mean it is not Al-Qaeda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Al-Qaeda (The Base) is supposedly an international terrorist network, organized as clandestine cells [wikipedia.org].
Not all groups have the same size, so this one could be a small group with only one guy willing to volunteer, or they only had enough money to send him.
Clearly this did not have the same amount of funding or manpower as the 9/11 attacks, but does not mean it is not Al-Qaeda.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556948</id>
	<title>Re:Probable Translation</title>
	<author>kvezach</author>
	<datestamp>1261853580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More like:<br> <br>

Crazy loner sets off home made firecracker on plane and lights pants on fire. Angry at being thwarted, loner claims al'Qaeda connection and watches the TSA/DHS scorpion sting itself to death yet again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More like : Crazy loner sets off home made firecracker on plane and lights pants on fire .
Angry at being thwarted , loner claims al'Qaeda connection and watches the TSA/DHS scorpion sting itself to death yet again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More like: 

Crazy loner sets off home made firecracker on plane and lights pants on fire.
Angry at being thwarted, loner claims al'Qaeda connection and watches the TSA/DHS scorpion sting itself to death yet again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670</id>
	<title>Wonderful</title>
	<author>markdavis</author>
	<datestamp>1261842240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, this is wonderful.  Now we will probably be strip searched and forced to wear airline clothing.  Why not just reconfigure planes to be more like cargo vehicles and put all passengers into a coma and pack and transport them like packages?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , this is wonderful .
Now we will probably be strip searched and forced to wear airline clothing .
Why not just reconfigure planes to be more like cargo vehicles and put all passengers into a coma and pack and transport them like packages ?
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, this is wonderful.
Now we will probably be strip searched and forced to wear airline clothing.
Why not just reconfigure planes to be more like cargo vehicles and put all passengers into a coma and pack and transport them like packages?
:(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561156</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261856100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...</p><p>That's right -the TSA has admitted that binary explosives are essentially impossible to pull off, and yet they still insist on on the totally pointless liquid restrictions.</p></div><p>So, the totally incompetent TSA, which is wrong in everything else, is suddenly to be believed this <b>ONE</b> time?</p><p>Cherry-pick much?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...That 's right -the TSA has admitted that binary explosives are essentially impossible to pull off , and yet they still insist on on the totally pointless liquid restrictions.So , the totally incompetent TSA , which is wrong in everything else , is suddenly to be believed this ONE time ? Cherry-pick much ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...That's right -the TSA has admitted that binary explosives are essentially impossible to pull off, and yet they still insist on on the totally pointless liquid restrictions.So, the totally incompetent TSA, which is wrong in everything else, is suddenly to be believed this ONE time?Cherry-pick much?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30562408</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>mce</author>
	<datestamp>1261918080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>See my other post elsewhere in this discussion: <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1490372&amp;cid=30562402" title="slashdot.org">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1490372&amp;cid=30562402</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>See my other post elsewhere in this discussion : http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1490372&amp;cid = 30562402 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See my other post elsewhere in this discussion: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1490372&amp;cid=30562402 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556474</id>
	<title>Re:"possibly a firecracker"</title>
	<author>wjsteele</author>
	<datestamp>1261849440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The reports clearly indicate that they used water to extinguish the flame, so I doubt it could have been thermite.  Thermite will burn even while wet because it has it's own supply of oxygen.  It would take a lot of water to get the temperature low enough to actually put it out.<br> <br>

In WWII, my grandfather was a radar operator on a Navy ship.  In the event of an order to abandon the ship, his duty was to also ignite the thermite charges to ensure the destruction of the equipment.  The only problem was that he was ordered to stay by that equipment until it was completly destroyed... but thermite actually burns quite slowly.  If the ship was sinking, he, quite possibly, would have drowned before the thermite actually got a chance to destroy the equipment.  However, it would have continued to burn even as the ship was sinking.<br> <br>Lucky for him (and me!), that never happened!<br> <br>Bill</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reports clearly indicate that they used water to extinguish the flame , so I doubt it could have been thermite .
Thermite will burn even while wet because it has it 's own supply of oxygen .
It would take a lot of water to get the temperature low enough to actually put it out .
In WWII , my grandfather was a radar operator on a Navy ship .
In the event of an order to abandon the ship , his duty was to also ignite the thermite charges to ensure the destruction of the equipment .
The only problem was that he was ordered to stay by that equipment until it was completly destroyed... but thermite actually burns quite slowly .
If the ship was sinking , he , quite possibly , would have drowned before the thermite actually got a chance to destroy the equipment .
However , it would have continued to burn even as the ship was sinking .
Lucky for him ( and me !
) , that never happened !
Bill</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reports clearly indicate that they used water to extinguish the flame, so I doubt it could have been thermite.
Thermite will burn even while wet because it has it's own supply of oxygen.
It would take a lot of water to get the temperature low enough to actually put it out.
In WWII, my grandfather was a radar operator on a Navy ship.
In the event of an order to abandon the ship, his duty was to also ignite the thermite charges to ensure the destruction of the equipment.
The only problem was that he was ordered to stay by that equipment until it was completly destroyed... but thermite actually burns quite slowly.
If the ship was sinking, he, quite possibly, would have drowned before the thermite actually got a chance to destroy the equipment.
However, it would have continued to burn even as the ship was sinking.
Lucky for him (and me!
), that never happened!
Bill</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558428</id>
	<title>It's hilarious and depressing</title>
	<author>Blappo</author>
	<datestamp>1261822680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Virtually all of the discussion here (at the moment 450 comments) regards the US Airlines security response and the various and sundry ways it's stupid.</p><p>Which, really, is the least important, least interesting, most overdone subject on Slashdot, but never ceases to be the only thing that occupies Slashdotters minds, as though serious, critical thinking about what happened is beyond you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Virtually all of the discussion here ( at the moment 450 comments ) regards the US Airlines security response and the various and sundry ways it 's stupid.Which , really , is the least important , least interesting , most overdone subject on Slashdot , but never ceases to be the only thing that occupies Slashdotters minds , as though serious , critical thinking about what happened is beyond you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Virtually all of the discussion here (at the moment 450 comments) regards the US Airlines security response and the various and sundry ways it's stupid.Which, really, is the least important, least interesting, most overdone subject on Slashdot, but never ceases to be the only thing that occupies Slashdotters minds, as though serious, critical thinking about what happened is beyond you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558742</id>
	<title>Re:This attack was perfectly succesful</title>
	<author>TheGratefulNet</author>
	<datestamp>1261824960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ROI is more than they could have imagined.  their success rate is over the roof (so to speak)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>it simply does not matter if they blow stuff up or not.  they really don't care about specifics (we do but they don't).  they simply want to DISRUPT our lives.  they success, EVERY FUCKING TIME.  why?  we play to them.</p><p>we continue to assasinate our own cultural values each time we are 'afraid'.</p><p>GROW SOME BALLS, AMERICANS!</p><p>sheesh.  had to be said, sorry.</p><p>stop playing to the fears from a bunch of god-worshippers.  oh, right, I forgot; YOU TOO (likely, given the stats) 'fear god' and so are just as clueless and easily manipulated.</p><p>I'm sorry but I'm just annoyed at the whole lot of you.  they fuck with us and we fuck with ourselves.  there's no end to this insanity!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ROI is more than they could have imagined .
their success rate is over the roof ( so to speak ) ; ) it simply does not matter if they blow stuff up or not .
they really do n't care about specifics ( we do but they do n't ) .
they simply want to DISRUPT our lives .
they success , EVERY FUCKING TIME .
why ? we play to them.we continue to assasinate our own cultural values each time we are 'afraid'.GROW SOME BALLS , AMERICANS ! sheesh .
had to be said , sorry.stop playing to the fears from a bunch of god-worshippers .
oh , right , I forgot ; YOU TOO ( likely , given the stats ) 'fear god ' and so are just as clueless and easily manipulated.I 'm sorry but I 'm just annoyed at the whole lot of you .
they fuck with us and we fuck with ourselves .
there 's no end to this insanity !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ROI is more than they could have imagined.
their success rate is over the roof (so to speak) ;)it simply does not matter if they blow stuff up or not.
they really don't care about specifics (we do but they don't).
they simply want to DISRUPT our lives.
they success, EVERY FUCKING TIME.
why?  we play to them.we continue to assasinate our own cultural values each time we are 'afraid'.GROW SOME BALLS, AMERICANS!sheesh.
had to be said, sorry.stop playing to the fears from a bunch of god-worshippers.
oh, right, I forgot; YOU TOO (likely, given the stats) 'fear god' and so are just as clueless and easily manipulated.I'm sorry but I'm just annoyed at the whole lot of you.
they fuck with us and we fuck with ourselves.
there's no end to this insanity!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556088</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261846020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forget the definition of terrorism.  To induce terror.  Considering what this guy probably had on him, it is highly unlikely he would've done more than cause fire and smoke.  The overall result, however, is just what any terrorist would want, loner or not.  We get scared, we make big changes that makes everyone remember the event (take off your shoes, your coat, your laptop, your pants).  So, regardless of whether this event billed as an "unsuccessful attempt", in many ways it defines successful terrorism.</p><p>The only way to get people to stop trying to scare us is to encourage them to stop thinking we are the enemy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forget the definition of terrorism .
To induce terror .
Considering what this guy probably had on him , it is highly unlikely he would 've done more than cause fire and smoke .
The overall result , however , is just what any terrorist would want , loner or not .
We get scared , we make big changes that makes everyone remember the event ( take off your shoes , your coat , your laptop , your pants ) .
So , regardless of whether this event billed as an " unsuccessful attempt " , in many ways it defines successful terrorism.The only way to get people to stop trying to scare us is to encourage them to stop thinking we are the enemy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forget the definition of terrorism.
To induce terror.
Considering what this guy probably had on him, it is highly unlikely he would've done more than cause fire and smoke.
The overall result, however, is just what any terrorist would want, loner or not.
We get scared, we make big changes that makes everyone remember the event (take off your shoes, your coat, your laptop, your pants).
So, regardless of whether this event billed as an "unsuccessful attempt", in many ways it defines successful terrorism.The only way to get people to stop trying to scare us is to encourage them to stop thinking we are the enemy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556644</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful</title>
	<author>Psyborgue</author>
	<datestamp>1261850880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wouldn't mind that, actually.  I'd actually prefer it to being crammed into coach.  At least I wouldn't feel the discomfort.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't mind that , actually .
I 'd actually prefer it to being crammed into coach .
At least I would n't feel the discomfort .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't mind that, actually.
I'd actually prefer it to being crammed into coach.
At least I wouldn't feel the discomfort.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560762</id>
	<title>So far...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261849440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So far, they've unveiled absurd new rules.  I'm highly disappointed, and I voted for Obama.  I've also voted for Janet Napolitano.  Not impressed with her leadership, either.</p><p>Someone who would put a stop to the anti-passenger rules and invest in real security measures (e.g. armed guards) could cause me to rethink my voting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So far , they 've unveiled absurd new rules .
I 'm highly disappointed , and I voted for Obama .
I 've also voted for Janet Napolitano .
Not impressed with her leadership , either.Someone who would put a stop to the anti-passenger rules and invest in real security measures ( e.g .
armed guards ) could cause me to rethink my voting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So far, they've unveiled absurd new rules.
I'm highly disappointed, and I voted for Obama.
I've also voted for Janet Napolitano.
Not impressed with her leadership, either.Someone who would put a stop to the anti-passenger rules and invest in real security measures (e.g.
armed guards) could cause me to rethink my voting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561764</id>
	<title>Re:URGNET HELP NEEDED PLS</title>
	<author>12WTF$</author>
	<datestamp>1261907460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Liar liar,<br>
Pants on fire</htmltext>
<tokenext>Liar liar , Pants on fire</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Liar liar,
Pants on fire</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555780</id>
	<title>All one big misunderstanding...</title>
	<author>anomnomnomymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261843200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>As far as I've heard, the so-called terrorist was just the son of the king of Nigeria, who was -finally- able to flee the country, after he succeeded to get all his money transferred to foreign banks by sending out those emails the past few years.<br> <br>
I assume the fireworks was just to celebrate his escape... I hope he's also going to finally pay my interest he promised,
when I helped transfer those 100.000 dollars.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as I 've heard , the so-called terrorist was just the son of the king of Nigeria , who was -finally- able to flee the country , after he succeeded to get all his money transferred to foreign banks by sending out those emails the past few years .
I assume the fireworks was just to celebrate his escape... I hope he 's also going to finally pay my interest he promised , when I helped transfer those 100.000 dollars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as I've heard, the so-called terrorist was just the son of the king of Nigeria, who was -finally- able to flee the country, after he succeeded to get all his money transferred to foreign banks by sending out those emails the past few years.
I assume the fireworks was just to celebrate his escape... I hope he's also going to finally pay my interest he promised,
when I helped transfer those 100.000 dollars.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556744</id>
	<title>Come on... It makes no sense...</title>
	<author>denzacar</author>
	<datestamp>1261851840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Engineering Ability = 1/Fanaticism</p></div><p>Apple products are not THAT bad. Most are actually quite usable.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Engineering Ability = 1/FanaticismApple products are not THAT bad .
Most are actually quite usable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Engineering Ability = 1/FanaticismApple products are not THAT bad.
Most are actually quite usable.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556562</id>
	<title>Re:This attack was perfectly succesful</title>
	<author>Mordac</author>
	<datestamp>1261850280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's also remember this is an international flight... that had nothing to do with US Security. He snuck his "explosives" on in Nigeria, and got it through a simple plane change in Amsterdam.</p><p>How the US could imagine its all their own fault will be amazing, but I'm sure they can do it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's also remember this is an international flight... that had nothing to do with US Security .
He snuck his " explosives " on in Nigeria , and got it through a simple plane change in Amsterdam.How the US could imagine its all their own fault will be amazing , but I 'm sure they can do it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's also remember this is an international flight... that had nothing to do with US Security.
He snuck his "explosives" on in Nigeria, and got it through a simple plane change in Amsterdam.How the US could imagine its all their own fault will be amazing, but I'm sure they can do it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557068</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>zonky</author>
	<datestamp>1261854660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Easy to mark troll, but it's worthy of examination.

Is there a centralised 'Al Qaeda' which plans and executes missions a la SMERSH (which seems to be the common message sold in the media).

Probably not.

The other claim is around a shared 'philosophy' of Al Qaeda- which apparently seems to mean an intense dislike of US foreign policy, and violent means to oppose it.

Arguably, but then you'd be calling many anti-capatalists protestors 'Al Qaeda'.

There certainly seems to be a militant brand of Islam which calls for a nationalist<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/self-determinest approach to defeating american foreign policy through violent means, but it does appear to be high fragmented, and non centralised. Call that Al Qaeda if you like, but lumping it together seems highly misguided.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Easy to mark troll , but it 's worthy of examination .
Is there a centralised 'Al Qaeda ' which plans and executes missions a la SMERSH ( which seems to be the common message sold in the media ) .
Probably not .
The other claim is around a shared 'philosophy ' of Al Qaeda- which apparently seems to mean an intense dislike of US foreign policy , and violent means to oppose it .
Arguably , but then you 'd be calling many anti-capatalists protestors 'Al Qaeda' .
There certainly seems to be a militant brand of Islam which calls for a nationalist /self-determinest approach to defeating american foreign policy through violent means , but it does appear to be high fragmented , and non centralised .
Call that Al Qaeda if you like , but lumping it together seems highly misguided .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Easy to mark troll, but it's worthy of examination.
Is there a centralised 'Al Qaeda' which plans and executes missions a la SMERSH (which seems to be the common message sold in the media).
Probably not.
The other claim is around a shared 'philosophy' of Al Qaeda- which apparently seems to mean an intense dislike of US foreign policy, and violent means to oppose it.
Arguably, but then you'd be calling many anti-capatalists protestors 'Al Qaeda'.
There certainly seems to be a militant brand of Islam which calls for a nationalist /self-determinest approach to defeating american foreign policy through violent means, but it does appear to be high fragmented, and non centralised.
Call that Al Qaeda if you like, but lumping it together seems highly misguided.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556160</id>
	<title>Fanaticism = 1/Engineering</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261846740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This fizzle-bomber, alongside with couple of previous attempts (the one with shoe fire, and couple of fizzle smokers in GB), seems to somewhat follow the similar pattern I tried to explain with simple equation:
<br> <br>
<tt>Engineering Ability = 1/Fanaticism</tt>
<br> <br>
By 'Engineering Ability' I mean the overall knowledge, creativity, practice, experimenting, logistics, and generally effort involved in producing an rather complex technical devices.
<br> <br>
As for the 9/11 group, it appears this was the top of the fanatics' intellectual/engineering crop, where fanaticism was sufficient just enough to match their engineering abilities, enabling them to fly, but not to takeoff/land the planes, or to save themselves. It is also beneficial (for the terrorized side), by above definition, such 'masterminds' are removed from living - at the time of their top achievement.
<br>
Subsequent attempts, while abundant in fanaticism, were mush less sophisticated in every aspect.
<br>
I like above equation because it keeps my hope in humanity a notch above the absolute zero.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This fizzle-bomber , alongside with couple of previous attempts ( the one with shoe fire , and couple of fizzle smokers in GB ) , seems to somewhat follow the similar pattern I tried to explain with simple equation : Engineering Ability = 1/Fanaticism By 'Engineering Ability ' I mean the overall knowledge , creativity , practice , experimenting , logistics , and generally effort involved in producing an rather complex technical devices .
As for the 9/11 group , it appears this was the top of the fanatics ' intellectual/engineering crop , where fanaticism was sufficient just enough to match their engineering abilities , enabling them to fly , but not to takeoff/land the planes , or to save themselves .
It is also beneficial ( for the terrorized side ) , by above definition , such 'masterminds ' are removed from living - at the time of their top achievement .
Subsequent attempts , while abundant in fanaticism , were mush less sophisticated in every aspect .
I like above equation because it keeps my hope in humanity a notch above the absolute zero .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This fizzle-bomber, alongside with couple of previous attempts (the one with shoe fire, and couple of fizzle smokers in GB), seems to somewhat follow the similar pattern I tried to explain with simple equation:
 
Engineering Ability = 1/Fanaticism
 
By 'Engineering Ability' I mean the overall knowledge, creativity, practice, experimenting, logistics, and generally effort involved in producing an rather complex technical devices.
As for the 9/11 group, it appears this was the top of the fanatics' intellectual/engineering crop, where fanaticism was sufficient just enough to match their engineering abilities, enabling them to fly, but not to takeoff/land the planes, or to save themselves.
It is also beneficial (for the terrorized side), by above definition, such 'masterminds' are removed from living - at the time of their top achievement.
Subsequent attempts, while abundant in fanaticism, were mush less sophisticated in every aspect.
I like above equation because it keeps my hope in humanity a notch above the absolute zero.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261843320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mandatory bacon sandwiches before boarding the plane. Everybody wins.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mandatory bacon sandwiches before boarding the plane .
Everybody wins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mandatory bacon sandwiches before boarding the plane.
Everybody wins.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557450</id>
	<title>Re: Conditional Probabilities of Airport Screening</title>
	<author>GreekLawyer</author>
	<datestamp>1261857720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is funny how many smart slashdot geeks forget their conditional probabilities - 99.9\% of Muslims may not be terrorists but 99\% of terrorists trying to blow up planes are most probably Muslims.


Ergo, by searching Muslims you have a higher risk of catching the terrorist rather than searching, lets say, Buddhists who board the plane.


These people will also certainly have a tendency of being agitated before the flight therefore careful screening of passengers with cameras a-la casino security against cheaters plus pattern recognition software a la "lie to me" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie\_to\_Me) could help screen many potential threats.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is funny how many smart slashdot geeks forget their conditional probabilities - 99.9 \ % of Muslims may not be terrorists but 99 \ % of terrorists trying to blow up planes are most probably Muslims .
Ergo , by searching Muslims you have a higher risk of catching the terrorist rather than searching , lets say , Buddhists who board the plane .
These people will also certainly have a tendency of being agitated before the flight therefore careful screening of passengers with cameras a-la casino security against cheaters plus pattern recognition software a la " lie to me " ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie \ _to \ _Me ) could help screen many potential threats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is funny how many smart slashdot geeks forget their conditional probabilities - 99.9\% of Muslims may not be terrorists but 99\% of terrorists trying to blow up planes are most probably Muslims.
Ergo, by searching Muslims you have a higher risk of catching the terrorist rather than searching, lets say, Buddhists who board the plane.
These people will also certainly have a tendency of being agitated before the flight therefore careful screening of passengers with cameras a-la casino security against cheaters plus pattern recognition software a la "lie to me" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie\_to\_Me) could help screen many potential threats.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560440</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261845180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And there's far more Christians serving in the Middle East who are more loyal to the US and what it stands for than you are, you insensitive clod!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And there 's far more Christians serving in the Middle East who are more loyal to the US and what it stands for than you are , you insensitive clod !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And there's far more Christians serving in the Middle East who are more loyal to the US and what it stands for than you are, you insensitive clod!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555720</id>
	<title>URGNET HELP NEEDED PLS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261842660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the desk of Barrister Kofi Kukukuku,<br>Ministry of Finance,<br>Federal Republic of Nigeria.</p><p>Dear    ,</p><p>I hope this message finds you well. I am in urgent need of a representative in you country<br>to assist with the transfer of $10 USD Million for legal assistance. The son of the deposed<br>dictator Silas Kofi Abdulmutallab who was assassinated in a violent coup in 2007. Is accused<br>of attempted bombing of a commercial flight from Amsterdam and is being held Ilegally by the<br>United States., who is demanding immediate bribe of $4 USD million for his release.. For your kind<br>assistance in this matter we are prepared to pay $5 USD million for simple transfer to an account<br>in your country, to prevent further taxation by corrupt officials. To assent, simply reply soonest<br>with the following information:</p><p>Your bank account number;<br>your address and phone numer;<br>your national idenification number for security pruposes.</p><p>I look forward to your kind assistance.</p><p>Sincerely,</p><p>Barrister Kofi Kukukuku</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the desk of Barrister Kofi Kukukuku,Ministry of Finance,Federal Republic of Nigeria.Dear ,I hope this message finds you well .
I am in urgent need of a representative in you countryto assist with the transfer of $ 10 USD Million for legal assistance .
The son of the deposeddictator Silas Kofi Abdulmutallab who was assassinated in a violent coup in 2007 .
Is accusedof attempted bombing of a commercial flight from Amsterdam and is being held Ilegally by theUnited States. , who is demanding immediate bribe of $ 4 USD million for his release.. For your kindassistance in this matter we are prepared to pay $ 5 USD million for simple transfer to an accountin your country , to prevent further taxation by corrupt officials .
To assent , simply reply soonestwith the following information : Your bank account number ; your address and phone numer ; your national idenification number for security pruposes.I look forward to your kind assistance.Sincerely,Barrister Kofi Kukukuku</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the desk of Barrister Kofi Kukukuku,Ministry of Finance,Federal Republic of Nigeria.Dear    ,I hope this message finds you well.
I am in urgent need of a representative in you countryto assist with the transfer of $10 USD Million for legal assistance.
The son of the deposeddictator Silas Kofi Abdulmutallab who was assassinated in a violent coup in 2007.
Is accusedof attempted bombing of a commercial flight from Amsterdam and is being held Ilegally by theUnited States., who is demanding immediate bribe of $4 USD million for his release.. For your kindassistance in this matter we are prepared to pay $5 USD million for simple transfer to an accountin your country, to prevent further taxation by corrupt officials.
To assent, simply reply soonestwith the following information:Your bank account number;your address and phone numer;your national idenification number for security pruposes.I look forward to your kind assistance.Sincerely,Barrister Kofi Kukukuku</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556002</id>
	<title>Re:It used to be...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261845360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those were the days when passengers could depend on their captors not being suicidal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those were the days when passengers could depend on their captors not being suicidal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those were the days when passengers could depend on their captors not being suicidal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557470</id>
	<title>They shouldn't have been so hasty</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261858020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Should've let his nuts roast for a while before putting out the fire in his pants.</p><p>Either that or kick the fire in the groin region out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should 've let his nuts roast for a while before putting out the fire in his pants.Either that or kick the fire in the groin region out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Should've let his nuts roast for a while before putting out the fire in his pants.Either that or kick the fire in the groin region out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556330</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>srmalloy</author>
	<datestamp>1261848180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That's right -the TSA has admitted that binary explosives are essentially impossible to pull off, and yet they still insist on on the totally pointless liquid restrictions.</p></div><p>That's likely because, as was demonstrated by this incompetent in miniature, even an improperly-mixed binary explosive, if in sufficient quantity, can cause a fire in the cabin that will compromise the safety of the passengers -- depressurization, fumes from the fire, fumes from upholstery, etc.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's right -the TSA has admitted that binary explosives are essentially impossible to pull off , and yet they still insist on on the totally pointless liquid restrictions.That 's likely because , as was demonstrated by this incompetent in miniature , even an improperly-mixed binary explosive , if in sufficient quantity , can cause a fire in the cabin that will compromise the safety of the passengers -- depressurization , fumes from the fire , fumes from upholstery , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's right -the TSA has admitted that binary explosives are essentially impossible to pull off, and yet they still insist on on the totally pointless liquid restrictions.That's likely because, as was demonstrated by this incompetent in miniature, even an improperly-mixed binary explosive, if in sufficient quantity, can cause a fire in the cabin that will compromise the safety of the passengers -- depressurization, fumes from the fire, fumes from upholstery, etc.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559526</id>
	<title>Re:Probable Translation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261831980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hell of a way to get bumped to first class</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hell of a way to get bumped to first class</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hell of a way to get bumped to first class</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557394</id>
	<title>"sophisticated explosives"</title>
	<author>GregNorc</author>
	<datestamp>1261857360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes I'm sure it was \_quite\_ sophisticated.</p><p>Just like the bombing attempt that lead to the liquid ban.</p><p>Oh wait, that attempt involved hydrogen peroxide and tang, which at worst would mean whoever sat next to the perp would have to get a few stitches. Ever filled a soda bottle with vinegar and baking soda? Same concept.</p><p>Bombs work two ways, either via explosive force, or by creating shrapnel. A bomb that does not have sufficient explosive force to breach the cabin, and that does not have sufficient force to propel small objects throughout the cabin will NEVER be a serious threat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes I 'm sure it was \ _quite \ _ sophisticated.Just like the bombing attempt that lead to the liquid ban.Oh wait , that attempt involved hydrogen peroxide and tang , which at worst would mean whoever sat next to the perp would have to get a few stitches .
Ever filled a soda bottle with vinegar and baking soda ?
Same concept.Bombs work two ways , either via explosive force , or by creating shrapnel .
A bomb that does not have sufficient explosive force to breach the cabin , and that does not have sufficient force to propel small objects throughout the cabin will NEVER be a serious threat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes I'm sure it was \_quite\_ sophisticated.Just like the bombing attempt that lead to the liquid ban.Oh wait, that attempt involved hydrogen peroxide and tang, which at worst would mean whoever sat next to the perp would have to get a few stitches.
Ever filled a soda bottle with vinegar and baking soda?
Same concept.Bombs work two ways, either via explosive force, or by creating shrapnel.
A bomb that does not have sufficient explosive force to breach the cabin, and that does not have sufficient force to propel small objects throughout the cabin will NEVER be a serious threat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555960</id>
	<title>Gives a new Definition to Flaiming Queen</title>
	<author>DeanFox</author>
	<datestamp>1261844940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><br>
The "hero" pulled a flaming object from his pants and tossed it asside...
<br>
The passenger identified as Nigerian named Abdul Mudallad - now known as Mrs. Mudallad...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The " hero " pulled a flaming object from his pants and tossed it asside.. . The passenger identified as Nigerian named Abdul Mudallad - now known as Mrs. Mudallad.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
The "hero" pulled a flaming object from his pants and tossed it asside...

The passenger identified as Nigerian named Abdul Mudallad - now known as Mrs. Mudallad...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556976</id>
	<title>or cheap mp3 player's lithium battery blows up and</title>
	<author>Locutus</author>
	<datestamp>1261853700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>he is beaten silly trying to put his pants out.  Remember the person who dropped their iPod down the toilet and tried to get it out and even asked the stewardess for help or explained what happened?  they considered that a terrorist act until they "got to the bottom of it". Literally. There are a few other examples of how obvious things got turned into terrorist acts until the "investigation" was concluded and quietly, if you looked, you'd find that it was nothing.<br><br>I'm not saying that there isn't a chance something harmful was intended but there's lots of evidence which shows people are pretty dumb about this stuff. Erroring on the side of caution is one thing, believing the common person on a plane to understand what really happened or to let the press tell it is asking for getting it wrong. IMO.<br><br>LoB</htmltext>
<tokenext>he is beaten silly trying to put his pants out .
Remember the person who dropped their iPod down the toilet and tried to get it out and even asked the stewardess for help or explained what happened ?
they considered that a terrorist act until they " got to the bottom of it " .
Literally. There are a few other examples of how obvious things got turned into terrorist acts until the " investigation " was concluded and quietly , if you looked , you 'd find that it was nothing.I 'm not saying that there is n't a chance something harmful was intended but there 's lots of evidence which shows people are pretty dumb about this stuff .
Erroring on the side of caution is one thing , believing the common person on a plane to understand what really happened or to let the press tell it is asking for getting it wrong .
IMO.LoB</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he is beaten silly trying to put his pants out.
Remember the person who dropped their iPod down the toilet and tried to get it out and even asked the stewardess for help or explained what happened?
they considered that a terrorist act until they "got to the bottom of it".
Literally. There are a few other examples of how obvious things got turned into terrorist acts until the "investigation" was concluded and quietly, if you looked, you'd find that it was nothing.I'm not saying that there isn't a chance something harmful was intended but there's lots of evidence which shows people are pretty dumb about this stuff.
Erroring on the side of caution is one thing, believing the common person on a plane to understand what really happened or to let the press tell it is asking for getting it wrong.
IMO.LoB</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560474</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261845480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just stop allowing brown people on planes.</p><p>Or ship them as packages thru UPS.  then the only ones they'd blow up are other brown people.   and some mail.</p><p>What can brown do for you?   Move your terrorists around!</p><p>Yeah, yeah i know.....   but i was going there anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just stop allowing brown people on planes.Or ship them as packages thru UPS .
then the only ones they 'd blow up are other brown people .
and some mail.What can brown do for you ?
Move your terrorists around ! Yeah , yeah i know..... but i was going there anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just stop allowing brown people on planes.Or ship them as packages thru UPS.
then the only ones they'd blow up are other brown people.
and some mail.What can brown do for you?
Move your terrorists around!Yeah, yeah i know.....   but i was going there anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555998</id>
	<title>Confused Nigerian Xmas Caroler?</title>
	<author>LifesABeach</author>
	<datestamp>1261845300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When hearing that the passenger's pants had "incinerated", my mind began to think of a old Christmas carol, <a href="http://www.carols.org.uk/the\_christmas\_song\_chestnuts\_roasting.htm" title="carols.org.uk">About Chestnuts, and an Open Fire.</a> [carols.org.uk]</htmltext>
<tokenext>When hearing that the passenger 's pants had " incinerated " , my mind began to think of a old Christmas carol , About Chestnuts , and an Open Fire .
[ carols.org.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When hearing that the passenger's pants had "incinerated", my mind began to think of a old Christmas carol, About Chestnuts, and an Open Fire.
[carols.org.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556026</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful</title>
	<author>Byzantine</author>
	<datestamp>1261845480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, considering that probably the easiest way to transport an unconscious human is on their back&mdash;at least we'd get to stretch out our legs!  (I'm only 5'8", and <em>I</em> find airplane coach seats cramped.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , considering that probably the easiest way to transport an unconscious human is on their back    at least we 'd get to stretch out our legs !
( I 'm only 5'8 " , and I find airplane coach seats cramped .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, considering that probably the easiest way to transport an unconscious human is on their back—at least we'd get to stretch out our legs!
(I'm only 5'8", and I find airplane coach seats cramped.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559670</id>
	<title>Just like the end scene in Alien:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261833840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Throw the fucker out the airlock.</p><p>Seriously, if he's a servant of Allah, then He will take care of the landing, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Throw the fucker out the airlock.Seriously , if he 's a servant of Allah , then He will take care of the landing , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Throw the fucker out the airlock.Seriously, if he's a servant of Allah, then He will take care of the landing, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30597018</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259867580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and shots of whiskey.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and shots of whiskey .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and shots of whiskey.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556510</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>squiggleslash</author>
	<datestamp>1261849680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Al Qaeda is not, as I understand it, a real entity. There's no board of directors, no "Department of Bringing Down Aeroplanes", no CTO. No organizational structure whatsoever. The term itself is supposed to have originated at the CIA.
</p><p>
The way to look at it instead is a term analogous to "Silicon Valley". The is a common thread ("A united Arab superstate/Making money through the advancement of computer technology"), there are the sources of funds (Osama Bin Laden/numerous Venture Capitalists), and then there are the numerous operations themselves. For every 9/11, there's a hundred shoe bombers. For every Apple Computer, there's a hundred Pets.coms.
</p><p>
Pants On Fire Guy was an idiot who wanted to bring down a plane in the cause of striking at the infidels and thus helping bring about an Arab Superstate. That's all the label means. That's all PoFG meant by invoking it. PoFG is no more an employee of Al Qaeda than Greg McLemore (who?) was an employee of Silicon Valley.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Al Qaeda is not , as I understand it , a real entity .
There 's no board of directors , no " Department of Bringing Down Aeroplanes " , no CTO .
No organizational structure whatsoever .
The term itself is supposed to have originated at the CIA .
The way to look at it instead is a term analogous to " Silicon Valley " .
The is a common thread ( " A united Arab superstate/Making money through the advancement of computer technology " ) , there are the sources of funds ( Osama Bin Laden/numerous Venture Capitalists ) , and then there are the numerous operations themselves .
For every 9/11 , there 's a hundred shoe bombers .
For every Apple Computer , there 's a hundred Pets.coms .
Pants On Fire Guy was an idiot who wanted to bring down a plane in the cause of striking at the infidels and thus helping bring about an Arab Superstate .
That 's all the label means .
That 's all PoFG meant by invoking it .
PoFG is no more an employee of Al Qaeda than Greg McLemore ( who ?
) was an employee of Silicon Valley .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Al Qaeda is not, as I understand it, a real entity.
There's no board of directors, no "Department of Bringing Down Aeroplanes", no CTO.
No organizational structure whatsoever.
The term itself is supposed to have originated at the CIA.
The way to look at it instead is a term analogous to "Silicon Valley".
The is a common thread ("A united Arab superstate/Making money through the advancement of computer technology"), there are the sources of funds (Osama Bin Laden/numerous Venture Capitalists), and then there are the numerous operations themselves.
For every 9/11, there's a hundred shoe bombers.
For every Apple Computer, there's a hundred Pets.coms.
Pants On Fire Guy was an idiot who wanted to bring down a plane in the cause of striking at the infidels and thus helping bring about an Arab Superstate.
That's all the label means.
That's all PoFG meant by invoking it.
PoFG is no more an employee of Al Qaeda than Greg McLemore (who?
) was an employee of Silicon Valley.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555662</id>
	<title>Probable Translation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261842120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Crazy loner sets off home made firecracker on plane and lights pants on fire.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    Crazy loner sets off home made firecracker on plane and lights pants on fire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    Crazy loner sets off home made firecracker on plane and lights pants on fire.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556360</id>
	<title>impossible - it was just a movie plot threat</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261848480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great God Schneier has assured us that movie plot threats are nothing to be afraid of.  This must therefore be a hoax.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great God Schneier has assured us that movie plot threats are nothing to be afraid of .
This must therefore be a hoax .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great God Schneier has assured us that movie plot threats are nothing to be afraid of.
This must therefore be a hoax.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556716</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261851540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"ruling out Al-Qaeda? they are not perfect."</p><p>Many of these apprehended "terrorists" seem to be as stupid as the "Liberty City Seven" (of Sears Tower fame), whose only contact with Al Qaeda was an FBI operative posing as an AQ member.<br>http://cbs11tv.com/national/miami.sears.tower.2.610440.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ruling out Al-Qaeda ?
they are not perfect .
" Many of these apprehended " terrorists " seem to be as stupid as the " Liberty City Seven " ( of Sears Tower fame ) , whose only contact with Al Qaeda was an FBI operative posing as an AQ member.http : //cbs11tv.com/national/miami.sears.tower.2.610440.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"ruling out Al-Qaeda?
they are not perfect.
"Many of these apprehended "terrorists" seem to be as stupid as the "Liberty City Seven" (of Sears Tower fame), whose only contact with Al Qaeda was an FBI operative posing as an AQ member.http://cbs11tv.com/national/miami.sears.tower.2.610440.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556388</id>
	<title>Re:Fucking douchebag</title>
	<author>Nimey</author>
	<datestamp>1261848720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It'll be interesting to compare Obama's response to the fear-fear-fear responses from the Bush Administration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'll be interesting to compare Obama 's response to the fear-fear-fear responses from the Bush Administration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'll be interesting to compare Obama's response to the fear-fear-fear responses from the Bush Administration.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556056</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1261845780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If this was really an al-Qaeda plot - then why did he not succeed in crashing the airplane ?</p></div><p>Because they had to depend on a suicidal human for the final part. And not all parts of Al Qaida (which is in practice a funding network for otherwise disparate Islamic themed terrorist groups) are uniformly competent. Having said that, this guy might well be someone who got scammed ("You want to strike a blow against the Great Satan? And you got real American dollars? We'll be whatever terrorist network you want us to be, buddy! Here's your top quality suicide pants! I use them myself!"). The so-called "lone wolf" who isn't connected to obvious terrorist groups.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this was really an al-Qaeda plot - then why did he not succeed in crashing the airplane ? Because they had to depend on a suicidal human for the final part .
And not all parts of Al Qaida ( which is in practice a funding network for otherwise disparate Islamic themed terrorist groups ) are uniformly competent .
Having said that , this guy might well be someone who got scammed ( " You want to strike a blow against the Great Satan ?
And you got real American dollars ?
We 'll be whatever terrorist network you want us to be , buddy !
Here 's your top quality suicide pants !
I use them myself ! " ) .
The so-called " lone wolf " who is n't connected to obvious terrorist groups .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this was really an al-Qaeda plot - then why did he not succeed in crashing the airplane ?Because they had to depend on a suicidal human for the final part.
And not all parts of Al Qaida (which is in practice a funding network for otherwise disparate Islamic themed terrorist groups) are uniformly competent.
Having said that, this guy might well be someone who got scammed ("You want to strike a blow against the Great Satan?
And you got real American dollars?
We'll be whatever terrorist network you want us to be, buddy!
Here's your top quality suicide pants!
I use them myself!").
The so-called "lone wolf" who isn't connected to obvious terrorist groups.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557266</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1261856400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somewhat arguing semantics, but why is an attack on a military target terrorism? Arguably divebombing a civilian airliner into a military target (Pentagon, 2001/09/11) is, as that involves using a civilian airliner with civilians aboard who didn't work for the Pentagon, but I can't wrap my mind enough to classify the bombing on the USS Cole as a terrorist attack, unless every single attack by the US military that had innocent civilians as collateral damage are also terrorist attacks, and I can't find myself fitting that into the term either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somewhat arguing semantics , but why is an attack on a military target terrorism ?
Arguably divebombing a civilian airliner into a military target ( Pentagon , 2001/09/11 ) is , as that involves using a civilian airliner with civilians aboard who did n't work for the Pentagon , but I ca n't wrap my mind enough to classify the bombing on the USS Cole as a terrorist attack , unless every single attack by the US military that had innocent civilians as collateral damage are also terrorist attacks , and I ca n't find myself fitting that into the term either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somewhat arguing semantics, but why is an attack on a military target terrorism?
Arguably divebombing a civilian airliner into a military target (Pentagon, 2001/09/11) is, as that involves using a civilian airliner with civilians aboard who didn't work for the Pentagon, but I can't wrap my mind enough to classify the bombing on the USS Cole as a terrorist attack, unless every single attack by the US military that had innocent civilians as collateral damage are also terrorist attacks, and I can't find myself fitting that into the term either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559356</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261830300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That doesn't mean they couldn't just start a fire on the plane.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That does n't mean they could n't just start a fire on the plane .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That doesn't mean they couldn't just start a fire on the plane.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558896</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Jah-Wren Ryel</author>
	<datestamp>1261826160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That's likely because, as was demonstrated by this incompetent in miniature, even an improperly-mixed binary explosive, if in sufficient quantity, can cause a fire in the cabin that will compromise the safety of the passengers -- depressurization, fumes from the fire, fumes from upholstery, etc.</p></div><p>Funny that they let people <a href="http://safetravel.dot.gov/index\_lighters.html" title="dot.gov">carry cigarette lighters and matches</a> [dot.gov] on board then, eh?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's likely because , as was demonstrated by this incompetent in miniature , even an improperly-mixed binary explosive , if in sufficient quantity , can cause a fire in the cabin that will compromise the safety of the passengers -- depressurization , fumes from the fire , fumes from upholstery , etc.Funny that they let people carry cigarette lighters and matches [ dot.gov ] on board then , eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's likely because, as was demonstrated by this incompetent in miniature, even an improperly-mixed binary explosive, if in sufficient quantity, can cause a fire in the cabin that will compromise the safety of the passengers -- depressurization, fumes from the fire, fumes from upholstery, etc.Funny that they let people carry cigarette lighters and matches [dot.gov] on board then, eh?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30579330</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Kinepak</title>
	<author>patrickcollins12</author>
	<datestamp>1262023380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow. It scares me that you know all of that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
It scares me that you know all of that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
It scares me that you know all of that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555786</id>
	<title>Multiple articles</title>
	<author>Pteraspidomorphi</author>
	<datestamp>1261843260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting how the CNN article is better, yet linked to in the bottom only...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting how the CNN article is better , yet linked to in the bottom only.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting how the CNN article is better, yet linked to in the bottom only...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30564452</id>
	<title>Two ways of looking at it and they chose wrong</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1261942800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real message from the attempt is that current measures are already more than adequate and that passenger intervention is by far the most flexible and effective method.</p><p>After all, in the end the man hurt only himself and he is in custody. By all reasonable measures he failed miserably. If not for the various passenger dehydration policies, the fire probably would have been out even faster. While some of the passengers got quite a fright, they DID get to skip the 30 minute circling the airport hassle as a sort of compensation.</p><p>Of course, federal authorities are now fighting hard to give the man a consolation prize. It seems his pointless little gesture may have a lasting impact on air travel after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real message from the attempt is that current measures are already more than adequate and that passenger intervention is by far the most flexible and effective method.After all , in the end the man hurt only himself and he is in custody .
By all reasonable measures he failed miserably .
If not for the various passenger dehydration policies , the fire probably would have been out even faster .
While some of the passengers got quite a fright , they DID get to skip the 30 minute circling the airport hassle as a sort of compensation.Of course , federal authorities are now fighting hard to give the man a consolation prize .
It seems his pointless little gesture may have a lasting impact on air travel after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real message from the attempt is that current measures are already more than adequate and that passenger intervention is by far the most flexible and effective method.After all, in the end the man hurt only himself and he is in custody.
By all reasonable measures he failed miserably.
If not for the various passenger dehydration policies, the fire probably would have been out even faster.
While some of the passengers got quite a fright, they DID get to skip the 30 minute circling the airport hassle as a sort of compensation.Of course, federal authorities are now fighting hard to give the man a consolation prize.
It seems his pointless little gesture may have a lasting impact on air travel after all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557366</id>
	<title>The real solution to this problem</title>
	<author>edmin</author>
	<datestamp>1261857060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is to have at least ten passengers on every plane, armed and willing to take out any terrorist who shows his intentions.  That won't solve all the problems, but it will stop any plot that involves hostages, or just about anything other that quietly detonating a bomb with no crazy behavior other warning signs.  The ten should be well-trained, so as to not make a bad situation worse.</htmltext>
<tokenext>is to have at least ten passengers on every plane , armed and willing to take out any terrorist who shows his intentions .
That wo n't solve all the problems , but it will stop any plot that involves hostages , or just about anything other that quietly detonating a bomb with no crazy behavior other warning signs .
The ten should be well-trained , so as to not make a bad situation worse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is to have at least ten passengers on every plane, armed and willing to take out any terrorist who shows his intentions.
That won't solve all the problems, but it will stop any plot that involves hostages, or just about anything other that quietly detonating a bomb with no crazy behavior other warning signs.
The ten should be well-trained, so as to not make a bad situation worse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555878</id>
	<title>Re:Should read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261844160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Mandatory bacon sandwiches before boarding the plane. Everybody wins.</p></div><p>Accompanied by a snifter of fine cognac. Or at least a shot of cheap vodka. No swallow - no fly.<br>
Damn, I'd even pay a couple of bucks for that kind of security...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mandatory bacon sandwiches before boarding the plane .
Everybody wins.Accompanied by a snifter of fine cognac .
Or at least a shot of cheap vodka .
No swallow - no fly .
Damn , I 'd even pay a couple of bucks for that kind of security.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mandatory bacon sandwiches before boarding the plane.
Everybody wins.Accompanied by a snifter of fine cognac.
Or at least a shot of cheap vodka.
No swallow - no fly.
Damn, I'd even pay a couple of bucks for that kind of security...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555682</id>
	<title>"possibly a firecracker"</title>
	<author>Suki I</author>
	<datestamp>1261842360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It did not sound like a firecracker in the latest reports I have been hearing on the radio.

Latest: it was a powder, plus a liquid from a syringe.  My blogger buddy remembered something I forgot, there is a way to ignite thermite with a liquid (potassium permanganate and glycerol? sorry for forgetting), but no idea what this was yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It did not sound like a firecracker in the latest reports I have been hearing on the radio .
Latest : it was a powder , plus a liquid from a syringe .
My blogger buddy remembered something I forgot , there is a way to ignite thermite with a liquid ( potassium permanganate and glycerol ?
sorry for forgetting ) , but no idea what this was yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It did not sound like a firecracker in the latest reports I have been hearing on the radio.
Latest: it was a powder, plus a liquid from a syringe.
My blogger buddy remembered something I forgot, there is a way to ignite thermite with a liquid (potassium permanganate and glycerol?
sorry for forgetting), but no idea what this was yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30562724</id>
	<title>KAL 858 was downed with nitroglycerine</title>
	<author>Zero return</author>
	<datestamp>1261924140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in 1987 by North Korean agents, so liquid explosives do actually present a potential threat.</p><p>Some more information about liquid explosives:</p><p> <a href="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009\_22-149180.html/" title="zdnet.com" rel="nofollow">http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009\_22-149180.html/</a> [zdnet.com] </p><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean\_Air\_Flight\_858/" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean\_Air\_Flight\_858/</a> [wikipedia.org]

</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in 1987 by North Korean agents , so liquid explosives do actually present a potential threat.Some more information about liquid explosives : http : //news.zdnet.com/2100-1009 \ _22-149180.html/ [ zdnet.com ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean \ _Air \ _Flight \ _858/ [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in 1987 by North Korean agents, so liquid explosives do actually present a potential threat.Some more information about liquid explosives: http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009\_22-149180.html/ [zdnet.com]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean\_Air\_Flight\_858/ [wikipedia.org]

</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559036</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>orzetto</author>
	<datestamp>1261827300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Most terrorist <strong>pawns</strong>, [...]</p></div></blockquote><p>There, corrected that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most terrorist pawns , [ ... ] There , corrected that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most terrorist pawns, [...]There, corrected that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555804</id>
	<title>informative Mar"emare</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261843500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>escape them by other membeArs in You join today! reasons why anyone R3cent article put Baby take my this exploitation, Has run faster</htmltext>
<tokenext>escape them by other membeArs in You join today !
reasons why anyone R3cent article put Baby take my this exploitation , Has run faster</tokentext>
<sentencetext>escape them by other membeArs in You join today!
reasons why anyone R3cent article put Baby take my this exploitation, Has run faster</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556008</id>
	<title>Re:Why did he not succeed ?</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1261845360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> If this was really an al-Qaeda plot - then why did he not succeed in crashing the airplane ?</p></div></blockquote><p>He made a bad roll against his DEX.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this was really an al-Qaeda plot - then why did he not succeed in crashing the airplane ? He made a bad roll against his DEX .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> If this was really an al-Qaeda plot - then why did he not succeed in crashing the airplane ?He made a bad roll against his DEX.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30562724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30602134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557898
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_129</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30562266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30567998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30562114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_128</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30576958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30562408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30562250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30597018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30682512
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30579330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30568970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30566924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_126</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_127</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_26_1428206_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557336
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556138
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555900
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558880
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556448
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556180
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558684
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559356
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561992
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556330
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559644
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557362
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558896
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557114
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561156
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30562724
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556650
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555814
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557732
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557282
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557812
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558226
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556056
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556260
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556070
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556256
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556134
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557158
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559674
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557148
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556722
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30562408
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555884
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560864
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556652
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557668
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556938
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557142
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556574
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557100
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558352
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560124
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556716
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556740
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556030
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556582
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556388
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557898
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558760
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560762
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558242
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557164
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30682512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555826
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30576958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555914
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557594
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30566924
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30562250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30602134
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30579330
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555818
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556258
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555640
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30562114
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556744
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558940
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560334
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557686
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556474
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557428
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556058
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556002
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559078
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555790
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30562266
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556530
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560474
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30597018
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560038
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556666
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555878
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556756
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555868
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559676
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30568970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555794
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556254
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560440
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556036
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557450
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556158
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556528
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558846
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556676
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559420
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555802
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555756
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30561250
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558600
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30555686
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30557366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_26_1428206.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30558742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30567998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30556820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30559538
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_26_1428206.30560310
</commentlist>
</conversation>
