<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_22_1911216</id>
	<title>Opera 10.5 Pre-Alpha Is Out, and It's Fast</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1261474320000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>sgunhouse writes to let us know that, following a <a href="http://techie-buzz.com/opera/opera-10-5-internal-build-leaked.html">leaked internal build</a> over the weekend, Opera Software has now released their <a href="http://labs.opera.com/news/2009/12/22/">official 10.5 pre-alpha</a>. There are no Linux versions yet. And an anonymous reader adds, <i>"Opera's 10.5 pre-alpha includes the <a href="http://my.opera.com/core/blog/2009/12/22/carakan-revisited">Carakan JavaScript Engine</a>. Benchmarks now show that <a href="http://www.pallab.net/2009/12/22/opera-10-50-released-opera-is-once-again-the-fastest-browser-on-earth/">Opera is competitive with Chrome</a>, beating it in <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/12/22/opera-10-5s-new-carakan-javascript-engine-is-fast-google-chro/">Sunspider and other tests</a>. Safari, Firefox, and IE are all behind. This is still pre-alpha, so further speed gains should be expected."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>sgunhouse writes to let us know that , following a leaked internal build over the weekend , Opera Software has now released their official 10.5 pre-alpha .
There are no Linux versions yet .
And an anonymous reader adds , " Opera 's 10.5 pre-alpha includes the Carakan JavaScript Engine .
Benchmarks now show that Opera is competitive with Chrome , beating it in Sunspider and other tests .
Safari , Firefox , and IE are all behind .
This is still pre-alpha , so further speed gains should be expected .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sgunhouse writes to let us know that, following a leaked internal build over the weekend, Opera Software has now released their official 10.5 pre-alpha.
There are no Linux versions yet.
And an anonymous reader adds, "Opera's 10.5 pre-alpha includes the Carakan JavaScript Engine.
Benchmarks now show that Opera is competitive with Chrome, beating it in Sunspider and other tests.
Safari, Firefox, and IE are all behind.
This is still pre-alpha, so further speed gains should be expected.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530332</id>
	<title>And they are dropping the Qt dependancy!</title>
	<author>grandmofftarkin</author>
	<datestamp>1261482240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://my.opera.com/ruario/blog/unix-10-50-evenes-work-in-progress" title="opera.com">allowing for integration with Gtk and Qt</a> [opera.com]!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>allowing for integration with Gtk and Qt [ opera.com ] ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>allowing for integration with Gtk and Qt [opera.com]!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533024</id>
	<title>Re:By "fast", let's hope they don't mean...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261509300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do you have it enabled if it bothers you to have it popping up all the time?</p><p>Why on earth would anyone enable their error console anyway? That would annoy me in any browser.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do you have it enabled if it bothers you to have it popping up all the time ? Why on earth would anyone enable their error console anyway ?
That would annoy me in any browser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do you have it enabled if it bothers you to have it popping up all the time?Why on earth would anyone enable their error console anyway?
That would annoy me in any browser.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530124</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261481340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fast and secure... how unpleasant that must have been for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fast and secure... how unpleasant that must have been for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fast and secure... how unpleasant that must have been for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531018</id>
	<title>Re:Cool.</title>
	<author>richlv</author>
	<datestamp>1261486140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no. but you probably knew that and were partially trolling.<br>would be mighty cool if it became foss one day, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no .
but you probably knew that and were partially trolling.would be mighty cool if it became foss one day , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no.
but you probably knew that and were partially trolling.would be mighty cool if it became foss one day, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530900</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>richlv</author>
	<datestamp>1261485420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>erm, wait. tabbed browsing was brought to masses (avoiding "invented" here) by opera.</p><p>for me, it's mostly relatively low memory usage, built-in features that you have to hunt firefox plugins down for (mouse gestures and whatnot) and some features ff is missing (although there might be some obscure plugin for them, like tab previews, tab closure undos etc).</p><p>major feature is ability to set pages from history to be always loaded from cache, which allows to recover forum/slashdot/tracker/bugzilla messages if some problem occurs - although a major gripe of mine is inability to do this with https sites. that sucks. on the other hand, ff sucks even more badly at this.</p><p>then there's (built-in) ability to disable all images by default (enabling cached only ones !) and switch this on tab basis easily - awesome feature when using dog slow gprs.</p><p>oh, and opera was the first mainstream browser that introduced "persistent" browsing by saving state of your open tabs and restoring that upon next startup. a feature opera users got used to several years before firefox got this as a basic feature - no idea about msie.</p><p>in general, opera has indeed pioneered most of the features in modern browsers. being a passionate opensource user, opera is still the last bastion of proprietary software in my toolbox, despite of some major annoyances with it - which basically means all other browsers are even more annoying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>erm , wait .
tabbed browsing was brought to masses ( avoiding " invented " here ) by opera.for me , it 's mostly relatively low memory usage , built-in features that you have to hunt firefox plugins down for ( mouse gestures and whatnot ) and some features ff is missing ( although there might be some obscure plugin for them , like tab previews , tab closure undos etc ) .major feature is ability to set pages from history to be always loaded from cache , which allows to recover forum/slashdot/tracker/bugzilla messages if some problem occurs - although a major gripe of mine is inability to do this with https sites .
that sucks .
on the other hand , ff sucks even more badly at this.then there 's ( built-in ) ability to disable all images by default ( enabling cached only ones !
) and switch this on tab basis easily - awesome feature when using dog slow gprs.oh , and opera was the first mainstream browser that introduced " persistent " browsing by saving state of your open tabs and restoring that upon next startup .
a feature opera users got used to several years before firefox got this as a basic feature - no idea about msie.in general , opera has indeed pioneered most of the features in modern browsers .
being a passionate opensource user , opera is still the last bastion of proprietary software in my toolbox , despite of some major annoyances with it - which basically means all other browsers are even more annoying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>erm, wait.
tabbed browsing was brought to masses (avoiding "invented" here) by opera.for me, it's mostly relatively low memory usage, built-in features that you have to hunt firefox plugins down for (mouse gestures and whatnot) and some features ff is missing (although there might be some obscure plugin for them, like tab previews, tab closure undos etc).major feature is ability to set pages from history to be always loaded from cache, which allows to recover forum/slashdot/tracker/bugzilla messages if some problem occurs - although a major gripe of mine is inability to do this with https sites.
that sucks.
on the other hand, ff sucks even more badly at this.then there's (built-in) ability to disable all images by default (enabling cached only ones !
) and switch this on tab basis easily - awesome feature when using dog slow gprs.oh, and opera was the first mainstream browser that introduced "persistent" browsing by saving state of your open tabs and restoring that upon next startup.
a feature opera users got used to several years before firefox got this as a basic feature - no idea about msie.in general, opera has indeed pioneered most of the features in modern browsers.
being a passionate opensource user, opera is still the last bastion of proprietary software in my toolbox, despite of some major annoyances with it - which basically means all other browsers are even more annoying.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30539788</id>
	<title>Re:FAIL</title>
	<author>generaldusty</author>
	<datestamp>1259754900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>On my Intel Centrino Windows XP Laptop, I'm getting better numbers:

Total: 1028.0ms +/- 0.2\%</htmltext>
<tokenext>On my Intel Centrino Windows XP Laptop , I 'm getting better numbers : Total : 1028.0ms + /- 0.2 \ %</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On my Intel Centrino Windows XP Laptop, I'm getting better numbers:

Total: 1028.0ms +/- 0.2\%</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532438</id>
	<title>Re:Carakan is cross-platform</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261501380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Carakan<br>Carakan is our new JavaScript engine. It&rsquo;s fast, more than 7x faster in SunSpider than Opera 10.10 with Futhark on Windows (Mac optimization is not as far along). You can read more gritty details regarding register-based bytecode, automatic object classification and native code generation in the Opera Core blog."</p><p>doesn't sound too terribly cross platform to me especially considering both of the named systems are based on the x86 architecture, sounds to me like it will have to be optimized on every architecture/OS independently.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" CarakanCarakan is our new JavaScript engine .
It    s fast , more than 7x faster in SunSpider than Opera 10.10 with Futhark on Windows ( Mac optimization is not as far along ) .
You can read more gritty details regarding register-based bytecode , automatic object classification and native code generation in the Opera Core blog .
" does n't sound too terribly cross platform to me especially considering both of the named systems are based on the x86 architecture , sounds to me like it will have to be optimized on every architecture/OS independently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"CarakanCarakan is our new JavaScript engine.
It’s fast, more than 7x faster in SunSpider than Opera 10.10 with Futhark on Windows (Mac optimization is not as far along).
You can read more gritty details regarding register-based bytecode, automatic object classification and native code generation in the Opera Core blog.
"doesn't sound too terribly cross platform to me especially considering both of the named systems are based on the x86 architecture, sounds to me like it will have to be optimized on every architecture/OS independently.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534254</id>
	<title>Re:FAIL</title>
	<author>hkmwbz</author>
	<datestamp>1259761620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lawrence\_Bird = trolling fail. RTFA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lawrence \ _Bird = trolling fail .
RTFA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lawrence\_Bird = trolling fail.
RTFA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529840</id>
	<title>Re:Does it have Adblock?</title>
	<author>mechsoph</author>
	<datestamp>1261479960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can block the ads via hosts file: <a href="http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.txt" title="mvps.org">http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.txt</a> [mvps.org] </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can block the ads via hosts file : http : //www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.txt [ mvps.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can block the ads via hosts file: http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.txt [mvps.org] </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796</id>
	<title>FAIL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261484700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fast? Really? Not.  The acclaimed SunSpider test:</p><p>Opera 10.5 A fresh install:</p><p>Total:                 4790.0ms +/- 0.2\%</p><p>FIrefox 3.7a1pre20091222 (with extensions all enabled)</p><p>Total:                 1928.0ms +/- 3.4\%</p><p>and just for the heck of it</p><p>Opera 10.10</p><p>Total:                  8887.6ms +/- 1.9\%</p><p>is there some secret 'disable slow' preference in Opera I need to change?</p><p>Granted, this is on an old dual-cpu Athlon MP system so the absolute results are not comparable to anyone else but the relative results are - Opera Fails.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fast ?
Really ? Not .
The acclaimed SunSpider test : Opera 10.5 A fresh install : Total : 4790.0ms + /- 0.2 \ % FIrefox 3.7a1pre20091222 ( with extensions all enabled ) Total : 1928.0ms + /- 3.4 \ % and just for the heck of itOpera 10.10Total : 8887.6ms + /- 1.9 \ % is there some secret 'disable slow ' preference in Opera I need to change ? Granted , this is on an old dual-cpu Athlon MP system so the absolute results are not comparable to anyone else but the relative results are - Opera Fails .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fast?
Really? Not.
The acclaimed SunSpider test:Opera 10.5 A fresh install:Total:                 4790.0ms +/- 0.2\%FIrefox 3.7a1pre20091222 (with extensions all enabled)Total:                 1928.0ms +/- 3.4\%and just for the heck of itOpera 10.10Total:                  8887.6ms +/- 1.9\%is there some secret 'disable slow' preference in Opera I need to change?Granted, this is on an old dual-cpu Athlon MP system so the absolute results are not comparable to anyone else but the relative results are - Opera Fails.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534096</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>JasterBobaMereel</author>
	<datestamp>1259758200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IE was insecure, old and not mving<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Opera cost money (then) and had a reputation (then) for not rendering all sites correctly (mostly because they were IE centric)</p><p>Firefox was free and rendered the vast majority of sites correctly</p><p>It's the old story of it does not need to be better just good enough</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IE was insecure , old and not mving ...Opera cost money ( then ) and had a reputation ( then ) for not rendering all sites correctly ( mostly because they were IE centric ) Firefox was free and rendered the vast majority of sites correctlyIt 's the old story of it does not need to be better just good enough</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IE was insecure, old and not mving ...Opera cost money (then) and had a reputation (then) for not rendering all sites correctly (mostly because they were IE centric)Firefox was free and rendered the vast majority of sites correctlyIt's the old story of it does not need to be better just good enough</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531756</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>xmundt</author>
	<datestamp>1261492620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds really good, and, in general, I like Opera (and use it almost exclusively).   However, I HOPE they will have finally cleaned up the memory issues that gradually suck up every byte of available RAM over time.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Oh yea...there is also the problem that, even when masking as FireFox, I cannot get http://www.skyandtelescope.com/ to work properly.  It will not allow me to log in, and, has problems with the interactive star chart...So...Firefox it is.    And I will not EVEN talk about trying to use Godaddy.com....<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; But, again...I really like Opera and am hanging onto it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds really good , and , in general , I like Opera ( and use it almost exclusively ) .
However , I HOPE they will have finally cleaned up the memory issues that gradually suck up every byte of available RAM over time .
          Oh yea...there is also the problem that , even when masking as FireFox , I can not get http : //www.skyandtelescope.com/ to work properly .
It will not allow me to log in , and , has problems with the interactive star chart...So...Firefox it is .
And I will not EVEN talk about trying to use Godaddy.com... .           But , again...I really like Opera and am hanging onto it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds really good, and, in general, I like Opera (and use it almost exclusively).
However, I HOPE they will have finally cleaned up the memory issues that gradually suck up every byte of available RAM over time.
          Oh yea...there is also the problem that, even when masking as FireFox, I cannot get http://www.skyandtelescope.com/ to work properly.
It will not allow me to log in, and, has problems with the interactive star chart...So...Firefox it is.
And I will not EVEN talk about trying to use Godaddy.com....
          But, again...I really like Opera and am hanging onto it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531248</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>hkmwbz</author>
	<datestamp>1261487760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Aww, sad that Opera beat the crap out of your fav browser when it comes to speed?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Aww , sad that Opera beat the crap out of your fav browser when it comes to speed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aww, sad that Opera beat the crap out of your fav browser when it comes to speed?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532900</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>XO</author>
	<datestamp>1261507740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... the tab browsing that Opera had long before anyone else.  Firefox is a giant Frankenbrowser mish mash of crap with no clear focus as to what they are trying to achieve.  It is horribly slow, and sucks a metric assload of memory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... the tab browsing that Opera had long before anyone else .
Firefox is a giant Frankenbrowser mish mash of crap with no clear focus as to what they are trying to achieve .
It is horribly slow , and sucks a metric assload of memory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... the tab browsing that Opera had long before anyone else.
Firefox is a giant Frankenbrowser mish mash of crap with no clear focus as to what they are trying to achieve.
It is horribly slow, and sucks a metric assload of memory.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531092</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>hkmwbz</author>
	<datestamp>1261486740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Firefox's "killer feature" was that it was released at exactly the right time, during the big IE security scare where everyone was looking for a free replacement. Opera had tabs ages before Firefox did.

<p>Opera is smaller, faster and with features better integrated and streamlined. It can do what prety much most of the most popular Firefox extensions can, and without everything breaking with each release. Oh, and it's crazy fast and has the most responsive UI, period.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Firefox 's " killer feature " was that it was released at exactly the right time , during the big IE security scare where everyone was looking for a free replacement .
Opera had tabs ages before Firefox did .
Opera is smaller , faster and with features better integrated and streamlined .
It can do what prety much most of the most popular Firefox extensions can , and without everything breaking with each release .
Oh , and it 's crazy fast and has the most responsive UI , period .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Firefox's "killer feature" was that it was released at exactly the right time, during the big IE security scare where everyone was looking for a free replacement.
Opera had tabs ages before Firefox did.
Opera is smaller, faster and with features better integrated and streamlined.
It can do what prety much most of the most popular Firefox extensions can, and without everything breaking with each release.
Oh, and it's crazy fast and has the most responsive UI, period.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530560</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>HBoar</author>
	<datestamp>1261483380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I switched from FF when Opera 10 was in beta.  I don't think there was any one killer feature, but it's UI responsiveness in linux was probably the main reason.  At the time, it was a huge improvement over FF.  I believe FF has improved a lot since then, but I'm sticking with opera due to a number of little things I like -- Speed dial, built in bookmark sync, built in (and fairly decent) email client, a "paste and go" option on the right click menu..... etc.  None (or few) of the features are unique to opera, but they are packaged together in a browser that is very competitive in terms of speed under both linux and windows.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I switched from FF when Opera 10 was in beta .
I do n't think there was any one killer feature , but it 's UI responsiveness in linux was probably the main reason .
At the time , it was a huge improvement over FF .
I believe FF has improved a lot since then , but I 'm sticking with opera due to a number of little things I like -- Speed dial , built in bookmark sync , built in ( and fairly decent ) email client , a " paste and go " option on the right click menu..... etc. None ( or few ) of the features are unique to opera , but they are packaged together in a browser that is very competitive in terms of speed under both linux and windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I switched from FF when Opera 10 was in beta.
I don't think there was any one killer feature, but it's UI responsiveness in linux was probably the main reason.
At the time, it was a huge improvement over FF.
I believe FF has improved a lot since then, but I'm sticking with opera due to a number of little things I like -- Speed dial, built in bookmark sync, built in (and fairly decent) email client, a "paste and go" option on the right click menu..... etc.  None (or few) of the features are unique to opera, but they are packaged together in a browser that is very competitive in terms of speed under both linux and windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530166</id>
	<title>Dropping hard Qt requirement (Unix build)</title>
	<author>Sits</author>
	<datestamp>1261481520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the comments makes it clear that <a href="http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/2009/12/22/from-all-of-us-to-all-of-you#comment13760021" title="opera.com" rel="nofollow">Opera will no longer have to use Qt for the *nix build</a> [opera.com]. Will this just mean better platform integration or more speed though?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the comments makes it clear that Opera will no longer have to use Qt for the * nix build [ opera.com ] .
Will this just mean better platform integration or more speed though ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the comments makes it clear that Opera will no longer have to use Qt for the *nix build [opera.com].
Will this just mean better platform integration or more speed though?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530200</id>
	<title>Re:Alpha</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261481700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Alpha's and Beta's also usually have debugging/trapping stuff in them so that users can more easily report problems, so there really isnt a general rule that alphas and betas are usually faster, or usually slower.<br>
<br>
I'll say this tho.. I ran Opera 10 alpha for quite some time before the official release, and the official release was just as snappy.<br>
<br>
Opera has always been snappy. It is arguably the best browser available and has always been a trend setter. They are playing a little bit of follow the leader this time, but they again seem to be doing it just as well if not better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Alpha 's and Beta 's also usually have debugging/trapping stuff in them so that users can more easily report problems , so there really isnt a general rule that alphas and betas are usually faster , or usually slower .
I 'll say this tho.. I ran Opera 10 alpha for quite some time before the official release , and the official release was just as snappy .
Opera has always been snappy .
It is arguably the best browser available and has always been a trend setter .
They are playing a little bit of follow the leader this time , but they again seem to be doing it just as well if not better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alpha's and Beta's also usually have debugging/trapping stuff in them so that users can more easily report problems, so there really isnt a general rule that alphas and betas are usually faster, or usually slower.
I'll say this tho.. I ran Opera 10 alpha for quite some time before the official release, and the official release was just as snappy.
Opera has always been snappy.
It is arguably the best browser available and has always been a trend setter.
They are playing a little bit of follow the leader this time, but they again seem to be doing it just as well if not better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530614</id>
	<title>Re:Alpha</title>
	<author>hkmwbz</author>
	<datestamp>1261483620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, final releases are usually more optimized.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , final releases are usually more optimized .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, final releases are usually more optimized.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532166</id>
	<title>Closed source doesn't always suck</title>
	<author>noz</author>
	<datestamp>1261497720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Closed source software stinks. Microsot Windows crawls. Anything good by Microsoft is purchased from a former developer. Adobe is not only slow to fix security holes; it continues to distribute software it knows has holes that are actively being exploited. At work I'm exposed to corporate shit by IBM that is used in every incorrect way possible (arguably IBM is a contributor to this problem). Closed source makes me want to vomit. No privacy. No security.</p><p>But then there's Opera: possibly the only closed source project that  genuinely competes on quality: accurate, good interface, efficient, and even good security? Who knows.</p><p>But then I don't use anything closed source anymore, so perhaps I'm missing some other well deserved programs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Closed source software stinks .
Microsot Windows crawls .
Anything good by Microsoft is purchased from a former developer .
Adobe is not only slow to fix security holes ; it continues to distribute software it knows has holes that are actively being exploited .
At work I 'm exposed to corporate shit by IBM that is used in every incorrect way possible ( arguably IBM is a contributor to this problem ) .
Closed source makes me want to vomit .
No privacy .
No security.But then there 's Opera : possibly the only closed source project that genuinely competes on quality : accurate , good interface , efficient , and even good security ?
Who knows.But then I do n't use anything closed source anymore , so perhaps I 'm missing some other well deserved programs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Closed source software stinks.
Microsot Windows crawls.
Anything good by Microsoft is purchased from a former developer.
Adobe is not only slow to fix security holes; it continues to distribute software it knows has holes that are actively being exploited.
At work I'm exposed to corporate shit by IBM that is used in every incorrect way possible (arguably IBM is a contributor to this problem).
Closed source makes me want to vomit.
No privacy.
No security.But then there's Opera: possibly the only closed source project that  genuinely competes on quality: accurate, good interface, efficient, and even good security?
Who knows.But then I don't use anything closed source anymore, so perhaps I'm missing some other well deserved programs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30540550</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>Simetrical</author>
	<datestamp>1259760360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Opera is smaller, faster and with features better integrated and streamlined. It can do what prety much most of the most popular Firefox extensions can, and without everything breaking with each release. Oh, and it's crazy fast and has the most responsive UI, period.</p></div><p>Have you tried Chrome?  Its UI seems about as responsive as Opera's to me &mdash; meaning no perceptible lag at all.  Likewise on rendering/JS speed, although that's harder to gauge and is a much more rapidly-changing landscape right now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Opera is smaller , faster and with features better integrated and streamlined .
It can do what prety much most of the most popular Firefox extensions can , and without everything breaking with each release .
Oh , and it 's crazy fast and has the most responsive UI , period.Have you tried Chrome ?
Its UI seems about as responsive as Opera 's to me    meaning no perceptible lag at all .
Likewise on rendering/JS speed , although that 's harder to gauge and is a much more rapidly-changing landscape right now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Opera is smaller, faster and with features better integrated and streamlined.
It can do what prety much most of the most popular Firefox extensions can, and without everything breaking with each release.
Oh, and it's crazy fast and has the most responsive UI, period.Have you tried Chrome?
Its UI seems about as responsive as Opera's to me — meaning no perceptible lag at all.
Likewise on rendering/JS speed, although that's harder to gauge and is a much more rapidly-changing landscape right now.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530804</id>
	<title>Rendering speed</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1261484760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People seem to be focusing a lot on JS speed (often meaning specifically number crunching), but equally, if not more, important part is rendering speed, and DOM manipulation speed. And Opera has always been really, really good at that.</p><p>Now, I don't have hard numbers... but as an anecdote, consider that of all browsers that I've used, only Chrome and Opera (not just this alpha build, but 9.x and 10.x stable as well) are fast enough to not visibly lag while scrolling "Web 2.0" Slashdot discussions. Firefox, in particular, is slow, and IE is simply a non-starter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People seem to be focusing a lot on JS speed ( often meaning specifically number crunching ) , but equally , if not more , important part is rendering speed , and DOM manipulation speed .
And Opera has always been really , really good at that.Now , I do n't have hard numbers... but as an anecdote , consider that of all browsers that I 've used , only Chrome and Opera ( not just this alpha build , but 9.x and 10.x stable as well ) are fast enough to not visibly lag while scrolling " Web 2.0 " Slashdot discussions .
Firefox , in particular , is slow , and IE is simply a non-starter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People seem to be focusing a lot on JS speed (often meaning specifically number crunching), but equally, if not more, important part is rendering speed, and DOM manipulation speed.
And Opera has always been really, really good at that.Now, I don't have hard numbers... but as an anecdote, consider that of all browsers that I've used, only Chrome and Opera (not just this alpha build, but 9.x and 10.x stable as well) are fast enough to not visibly lag while scrolling "Web 2.0" Slashdot discussions.
Firefox, in particular, is slow, and IE is simply a non-starter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529518</id>
	<title>finally.  took em long enough...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261478520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As the dead-last loser of all the sunspider tests I've ran recently on windows and linux,(hell, even IE*6* was just barely slower) it couldn't get much slower than Opera10.   Have to take a peek finally.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As the dead-last loser of all the sunspider tests I 've ran recently on windows and linux , ( hell , even IE * 6 * was just barely slower ) it could n't get much slower than Opera10 .
Have to take a peek finally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As the dead-last loser of all the sunspider tests I've ran recently on windows and linux,(hell, even IE*6* was just barely slower) it couldn't get much slower than Opera10.
Have to take a peek finally.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530640</id>
	<title>Where's the Linux Version?</title>
	<author>Kartoffel</author>
	<datestamp>1261483800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is Slashdot after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is Slashdot after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is Slashdot after all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534230</id>
	<title>Re:Opera developement, or going the wrong way?</title>
	<author>hkmwbz</author>
	<datestamp>1259761320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What about ACTUAL features that users have been begging for, for 5 or 6 versions.</p></div></blockquote><p>
So because you want something, they must add it or their focus is wrong? Also, if you had paid attention, you would have noticed that there's a lot of new stuff there apart from the speed.</p><blockquote><div><p>Like a lot more control over ui customization.(try getting the menu next to your buttons so as not to waste a full row, and no, fake menus made of buttons do not behave like menus)</p></div></blockquote><p>
This is crazy. "I want more control, but I will specifically exclude the nearly limitless UI customization options that are there already." If you specifically exclude things it can do that you want, you can make any claim.</p><blockquote><div><p>Like type as you find?</p></div></blockquote><p>
What, you mean Opera's inline find, which they added ages before Firefox was even being considered?</p><blockquote><div><p>Features wise, opera only seems to like adding stuff pertinent to a select few, and ignore the rest of the world.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Yeah, because if they don't add exactly what you personally want, it's "just for a selected few"...</p><blockquote><div><p>It's just a browser that needs to get out of the dark age of control-is-security.</p></div></blockquote><p>
I actually think it's just you who needs to get his head out of his ass. But that's just me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about ACTUAL features that users have been begging for , for 5 or 6 versions .
So because you want something , they must add it or their focus is wrong ?
Also , if you had paid attention , you would have noticed that there 's a lot of new stuff there apart from the speed.Like a lot more control over ui customization .
( try getting the menu next to your buttons so as not to waste a full row , and no , fake menus made of buttons do not behave like menus ) This is crazy .
" I want more control , but I will specifically exclude the nearly limitless UI customization options that are there already .
" If you specifically exclude things it can do that you want , you can make any claim.Like type as you find ?
What , you mean Opera 's inline find , which they added ages before Firefox was even being considered ? Features wise , opera only seems to like adding stuff pertinent to a select few , and ignore the rest of the world .
Yeah , because if they do n't add exactly what you personally want , it 's " just for a selected few " ...It 's just a browser that needs to get out of the dark age of control-is-security .
I actually think it 's just you who needs to get his head out of his ass .
But that 's just me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about ACTUAL features that users have been begging for, for 5 or 6 versions.
So because you want something, they must add it or their focus is wrong?
Also, if you had paid attention, you would have noticed that there's a lot of new stuff there apart from the speed.Like a lot more control over ui customization.
(try getting the menu next to your buttons so as not to waste a full row, and no, fake menus made of buttons do not behave like menus)
This is crazy.
"I want more control, but I will specifically exclude the nearly limitless UI customization options that are there already.
" If you specifically exclude things it can do that you want, you can make any claim.Like type as you find?
What, you mean Opera's inline find, which they added ages before Firefox was even being considered?Features wise, opera only seems to like adding stuff pertinent to a select few, and ignore the rest of the world.
Yeah, because if they don't add exactly what you personally want, it's "just for a selected few"...It's just a browser that needs to get out of the dark age of control-is-security.
I actually think it's just you who needs to get his head out of his ass.
But that's just me.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533596</id>
	<title>Re:FAIL</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1259747220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's because you're using a pointless test:</p><p>"This is SunSpider, a JavaScript benchmark. <b>This benchmark tests the core JavaScript language only, not the DOM or other browser APIs.</b>"</p><p>Which is about as useless as it gets. Your typical web page doesn't do number crunching in JS; the heaviest operation it does is going to be AJAX calls and DOM manipulation, lots of it. So JS perf is nowhere nearly as important as the speed at which browser can redraw while DOM is being updated. And on that metric, Opera <em>is</em> fast; only Chrome seems to be able to beat it (but lags behind in features...).</p><p>Don't bother with tests. They're useless, really - for any UI-heavy application, you don't want raw perf; you want responsibility, and that's an altogether different beast, that can be only tested by actually trying it out, and not something you can capture in numbers. It's about how smooth the pages scroll, how responsible the UI is with 20 tabs loading at the same time... these kinds of things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's because you 're using a pointless test : " This is SunSpider , a JavaScript benchmark .
This benchmark tests the core JavaScript language only , not the DOM or other browser APIs .
" Which is about as useless as it gets .
Your typical web page does n't do number crunching in JS ; the heaviest operation it does is going to be AJAX calls and DOM manipulation , lots of it .
So JS perf is nowhere nearly as important as the speed at which browser can redraw while DOM is being updated .
And on that metric , Opera is fast ; only Chrome seems to be able to beat it ( but lags behind in features... ) .Do n't bother with tests .
They 're useless , really - for any UI-heavy application , you do n't want raw perf ; you want responsibility , and that 's an altogether different beast , that can be only tested by actually trying it out , and not something you can capture in numbers .
It 's about how smooth the pages scroll , how responsible the UI is with 20 tabs loading at the same time... these kinds of things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's because you're using a pointless test:"This is SunSpider, a JavaScript benchmark.
This benchmark tests the core JavaScript language only, not the DOM or other browser APIs.
"Which is about as useless as it gets.
Your typical web page doesn't do number crunching in JS; the heaviest operation it does is going to be AJAX calls and DOM manipulation, lots of it.
So JS perf is nowhere nearly as important as the speed at which browser can redraw while DOM is being updated.
And on that metric, Opera is fast; only Chrome seems to be able to beat it (but lags behind in features...).Don't bother with tests.
They're useless, really - for any UI-heavy application, you don't want raw perf; you want responsibility, and that's an altogether different beast, that can be only tested by actually trying it out, and not something you can capture in numbers.
It's about how smooth the pages scroll, how responsible the UI is with 20 tabs loading at the same time... these kinds of things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534244</id>
	<title>Re:It's fast is it?</title>
	<author>hkmwbz</author>
	<datestamp>1259761500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In my experience Safari's compatibility with sites i pretty pathetic compared to Opera. Opera was designed from the ground up to be compatible. Safari will happily sacrifice compatibility for speed (even though they are only the 3rd fastest browser now, behind Opera and Chrome).</htmltext>
<tokenext>In my experience Safari 's compatibility with sites i pretty pathetic compared to Opera .
Opera was designed from the ground up to be compatible .
Safari will happily sacrifice compatibility for speed ( even though they are only the 3rd fastest browser now , behind Opera and Chrome ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my experience Safari's compatibility with sites i pretty pathetic compared to Opera.
Opera was designed from the ground up to be compatible.
Safari will happily sacrifice compatibility for speed (even though they are only the 3rd fastest browser now, behind Opera and Chrome).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533794</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>Lord Bitman</author>
	<datestamp>1259750880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>opera did tabs right before firefox ever came out- and firefox still doesn't have proper tabbed windows -- because firefox is open source, and open source people don't like the back-end implementation of MDI interfaces, so open source people don't use MDI, despite it being a holy grail in usability for the web</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>opera did tabs right before firefox ever came out- and firefox still does n't have proper tabbed windows -- because firefox is open source , and open source people do n't like the back-end implementation of MDI interfaces , so open source people do n't use MDI , despite it being a holy grail in usability for the web</tokentext>
<sentencetext>opera did tabs right before firefox ever came out- and firefox still doesn't have proper tabbed windows -- because firefox is open source, and open source people don't like the back-end implementation of MDI interfaces, so open source people don't use MDI, despite it being a holy grail in usability for the web</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530592</id>
	<title>Re:Alpha</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1261483560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Isn't the opposite ussually the case? Alphas and betas are often a bit quicker than the final releases.</p></div><p>I don't know what software you're using, but on any normal code, alphas/betas aren't quicker at all, simply because they often do not have asserts and other similar checks compiled out to assist in debugging, diagnosing crash reports, etc.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't the opposite ussually the case ?
Alphas and betas are often a bit quicker than the final releases.I do n't know what software you 're using , but on any normal code , alphas/betas are n't quicker at all , simply because they often do not have asserts and other similar checks compiled out to assist in debugging , diagnosing crash reports , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't the opposite ussually the case?
Alphas and betas are often a bit quicker than the final releases.I don't know what software you're using, but on any normal code, alphas/betas aren't quicker at all, simply because they often do not have asserts and other similar checks compiled out to assist in debugging, diagnosing crash reports, etc.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532234</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>hairyfeet</author>
	<datestamp>1261498860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But I would say it is the wealth of plug ins that give FF its "killer feature" when compared to Opera. I don't want to surf the web YOUR way, or the way the IE or Opera teams decide is best, I want to surf MY way. With Firefox I have ABP, I have ForecastFox at the top to warn me of bad weather in my area, I have Noscript to allow ME to decide what does/doesn't run, iMacros for automating web forms, Downloadhelper and Downloadstatusbar to put Youtube videos and other web vids where I want them to go, and finally FEBE to back everything up nightly so it is easy peasy to sync my FF between my flash and my desktops.</p><p>

So while I have tried Opera at just about every new release, and have my oldest nephew swear by Opera, for me it just feels like I have to do everything THEIR way. And there is enough software in this world I have to work around because their way doesn't fit me, I don't need something like a browser which I spend a lot of time on to fight me too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But I would say it is the wealth of plug ins that give FF its " killer feature " when compared to Opera .
I do n't want to surf the web YOUR way , or the way the IE or Opera teams decide is best , I want to surf MY way .
With Firefox I have ABP , I have ForecastFox at the top to warn me of bad weather in my area , I have Noscript to allow ME to decide what does/does n't run , iMacros for automating web forms , Downloadhelper and Downloadstatusbar to put Youtube videos and other web vids where I want them to go , and finally FEBE to back everything up nightly so it is easy peasy to sync my FF between my flash and my desktops .
So while I have tried Opera at just about every new release , and have my oldest nephew swear by Opera , for me it just feels like I have to do everything THEIR way .
And there is enough software in this world I have to work around because their way does n't fit me , I do n't need something like a browser which I spend a lot of time on to fight me too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I would say it is the wealth of plug ins that give FF its "killer feature" when compared to Opera.
I don't want to surf the web YOUR way, or the way the IE or Opera teams decide is best, I want to surf MY way.
With Firefox I have ABP, I have ForecastFox at the top to warn me of bad weather in my area, I have Noscript to allow ME to decide what does/doesn't run, iMacros for automating web forms, Downloadhelper and Downloadstatusbar to put Youtube videos and other web vids where I want them to go, and finally FEBE to back everything up nightly so it is easy peasy to sync my FF between my flash and my desktops.
So while I have tried Opera at just about every new release, and have my oldest nephew swear by Opera, for me it just feels like I have to do everything THEIR way.
And there is enough software in this world I have to work around because their way doesn't fit me, I don't need something like a browser which I spend a lot of time on to fight me too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529704</id>
	<title>Re:Does it have Adblock?</title>
	<author>micksam7</author>
	<datestamp>1261479360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes.</p><p>Right click, choose "Block content", then select elements on a page you'd like to have blocked. Flash, images, iframes, what have you.</p><p>May not be as complete as AdBlock, but it's certainly useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes.Right click , choose " Block content " , then select elements on a page you 'd like to have blocked .
Flash , images , iframes , what have you.May not be as complete as AdBlock , but it 's certainly useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.Right click, choose "Block content", then select elements on a page you'd like to have blocked.
Flash, images, iframes, what have you.May not be as complete as AdBlock, but it's certainly useful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531722</id>
	<title>Re:Does it have Adblock?</title>
	<author>ya really</author>
	<datestamp>1261492320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><ol> <li>get the ad server list here: <a href="http://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers" title="yoyo.org">http://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers</a> [yoyo.org] </li><li>add list to your host file</li><li>reload browser</li><li>enjoy the benefits of adblocking without a plugin</li></ol></htmltext>
<tokenext>get the ad server list here : http : //pgl.yoyo.org/adservers [ yoyo.org ] add list to your host filereload browserenjoy the benefits of adblocking without a plugin</tokentext>
<sentencetext> get the ad server list here: http://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers [yoyo.org] add list to your host filereload browserenjoy the benefits of adblocking without a plugin</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530326</id>
	<title>Pre Alpha??</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1261482240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Beta is when you let outsiders test your product.  Closed if you are controlling who and how many, open if you aren't.</p><p>Alpha is internal testing.</p><p>How could something that is alpha or "pre-alpha" be "out"?  If it is out... it's should be called beta, or even public beta.  If alpha is the first testing, how can there be anything before alpha?</p><p>This sounds like it should be called a public beta. Just because it's not on the schedule, doesn't make it less public.</p><p>Can i blame Google for causing the abuse of these terms?</p><p>Or have i been lied to about these terms ever having meaning?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Beta is when you let outsiders test your product .
Closed if you are controlling who and how many , open if you are n't.Alpha is internal testing.How could something that is alpha or " pre-alpha " be " out " ?
If it is out... it 's should be called beta , or even public beta .
If alpha is the first testing , how can there be anything before alpha ? This sounds like it should be called a public beta .
Just because it 's not on the schedule , does n't make it less public.Can i blame Google for causing the abuse of these terms ? Or have i been lied to about these terms ever having meaning ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Beta is when you let outsiders test your product.
Closed if you are controlling who and how many, open if you aren't.Alpha is internal testing.How could something that is alpha or "pre-alpha" be "out"?
If it is out... it's should be called beta, or even public beta.
If alpha is the first testing, how can there be anything before alpha?This sounds like it should be called a public beta.
Just because it's not on the schedule, doesn't make it less public.Can i blame Google for causing the abuse of these terms?Or have i been lied to about these terms ever having meaning?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530140</id>
	<title>No Linux? :(</title>
	<author>Token\_Internet\_Girl</author>
	<datestamp>1261481400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>[quote] There are no Linux versions yet [/quote]

Those insensitive clods...</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ quote ] There are no Linux versions yet [ /quote ] Those insensitive clods.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[quote] There are no Linux versions yet [/quote]

Those insensitive clods...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531834</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261493520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Opera 10.x/10.5 still needs to improve drawing using canvas (html5) - way too slow. Safari and Chrome run circles around Opera and Firefox. IE is not even on the field. Since all this is still very new, Firefox and Opera will definitely improve, but for now they could do with an improvement in this area.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Opera 10.x/10.5 still needs to improve drawing using canvas ( html5 ) - way too slow .
Safari and Chrome run circles around Opera and Firefox .
IE is not even on the field .
Since all this is still very new , Firefox and Opera will definitely improve , but for now they could do with an improvement in this area .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Opera 10.x/10.5 still needs to improve drawing using canvas (html5) - way too slow.
Safari and Chrome run circles around Opera and Firefox.
IE is not even on the field.
Since all this is still very new, Firefox and Opera will definitely improve, but for now they could do with an improvement in this area.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534504</id>
	<title>Re:About Opera's GUI</title>
	<author>elcid73</author>
	<datestamp>1259764380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Amen brother- to me, the built in mouse gestures and cached history and customizable interface, the many milliseconds I've saved with those features alone are worth the random milliseconds of rendering time or scripting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Amen brother- to me , the built in mouse gestures and cached history and customizable interface , the many milliseconds I 've saved with those features alone are worth the random milliseconds of rendering time or scripting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amen brother- to me, the built in mouse gestures and cached history and customizable interface, the many milliseconds I've saved with those features alone are worth the random milliseconds of rendering time or scripting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531974</id>
	<title>Re:Alpha</title>
	<author>jp10558</author>
	<datestamp>1261495440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always thought in the Alphas and Betas, all the debugging code would slow it down over a release where that's been disabled. Certainly I've seen betas get faster for final release.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always thought in the Alphas and Betas , all the debugging code would slow it down over a release where that 's been disabled .
Certainly I 've seen betas get faster for final release .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always thought in the Alphas and Betas, all the debugging code would slow it down over a release where that's been disabled.
Certainly I've seen betas get faster for final release.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530826</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>richlv</author>
	<datestamp>1261484880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Dialog boxes (JavaScript alerts, HTTP authentication, etc.) are now non-modal and are displayed as a page overlay.</p></div><p>woohoo. does that also include download dialogs ? excellent if it does, lame if it doesn't.</p><p>also, i'll use the chance to point out things i'm annoyed about opera (being opera user since version 3, 4 or so, exclusively).</p><p>1. inability to disable refresh for history httpd pages. my current major annoyance. i've set history mode to 3, i've explored every other history option - nothing helps. can somebody from opera software who reads this help me, finally ?</p><p>2. new one - i can't find out how to customise opera to be more useful<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<br><a href="http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=302392" title="opera.com">http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=302392</a> [opera.com]</p><p>3. a pretty old one - "reload every" functionality got silently regressed, and nobody really responded on why usability was so seriously fucked up on this one.<br><a href="http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=225510" title="opera.com">http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=225510</a> [opera.com]</p><p>other than these i'm a quite happy opera user for many years and i'm excited about performance improvements for sure.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dialog boxes ( JavaScript alerts , HTTP authentication , etc .
) are now non-modal and are displayed as a page overlay.woohoo .
does that also include download dialogs ?
excellent if it does , lame if it does n't.also , i 'll use the chance to point out things i 'm annoyed about opera ( being opera user since version 3 , 4 or so , exclusively ) .1. inability to disable refresh for history httpd pages .
my current major annoyance .
i 've set history mode to 3 , i 've explored every other history option - nothing helps .
can somebody from opera software who reads this help me , finally ? 2 .
new one - i ca n't find out how to customise opera to be more useful : ) http : //my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml ? id = 302392 [ opera.com ] 3. a pretty old one - " reload every " functionality got silently regressed , and nobody really responded on why usability was so seriously fucked up on this one.http : //my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml ? id = 225510 [ opera.com ] other than these i 'm a quite happy opera user for many years and i 'm excited about performance improvements for sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dialog boxes (JavaScript alerts, HTTP authentication, etc.
) are now non-modal and are displayed as a page overlay.woohoo.
does that also include download dialogs ?
excellent if it does, lame if it doesn't.also, i'll use the chance to point out things i'm annoyed about opera (being opera user since version 3, 4 or so, exclusively).1. inability to disable refresh for history httpd pages.
my current major annoyance.
i've set history mode to 3, i've explored every other history option - nothing helps.
can somebody from opera software who reads this help me, finally ?2.
new one - i can't find out how to customise opera to be more useful :)http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=302392 [opera.com]3. a pretty old one - "reload every" functionality got silently regressed, and nobody really responded on why usability was so seriously fucked up on this one.http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=225510 [opera.com]other than these i'm a quite happy opera user for many years and i'm excited about performance improvements for sure.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384</id>
	<title>complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261477920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Complete What's new:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Carakan<br>Carakan is our new JavaScript engine. It&rsquo;s fast, more than 7x faster in SunSpider than Opera 10.10 with Futhark on Windows (Mac optimization is not as far along). You can read more gritty details regarding register-based bytecode, automatic object classification and native code generation in the Opera Core blog.</p><p>Presto 2.5<br>We are now using Presto 2.5, which contains a huge numbers of improvements. It also includes support for CSS3 transitions and transforms, and more HTML5 features like persistent storage.</p><p>Vega<br>Vega is our new graphics library. It&rsquo;s currently software based and displays everything you see on-screen. Vega can be hardware accelerated, but as you can see from the complex graphics benchmark in Peacekeeper, we don&rsquo;t seem to need it yet. (Note that Futuremarks Peacekeeper test does no include the results of their complex graphics tests in the overall score. We believe this is wrong in 2009 and will simply be silly if not changed in 2010.)</p><p>Outside - Platform integration<br>On Windows 7/Vista, you will notice a lot of visual changes and use of APIs which allow the UI to display the Aero Glass effect. For Windows 7, we also added Aero Peek and Jump List support to easily access your Speed Dials, Tabs, etc. from the Taskbar.<br>For Mac, a complete rewrite in Cocoa brings an Unified Toolbar, native buttons and scrollbars, multi-touch gestures (try 3-Finger Swipe Left/Right or Pinch to zoom) and a bunch of other small details. We also added Growl notification support.</p><p>&ldquo;Private tab&rdquo; and &ldquo;Private window&rdquo;<br>You can open a new Private tab or Private window that forgets everything that happened on it once closed.</p><p>Non-modal dialogs<br>Dialog boxes (JavaScript alerts, HTTP authentication, etc.) are now non-modal and are displayed as a page overlay. This allows you to switch tabs or windows while the dialog is still displayed. Similarly, the Password Manager dialog is now anchored at the top of the page won&rsquo;t block any content as it loads a new page.</p><p>Address field and Search field improvements<br>Both fields have been upgraded in looks and functionality. They can now remember searches, support removing items from history and show results in a better layout.</p></div><p>Opera just keeps getting better and better. It was in some Opera 10 beta that they improved the JS engine a lot, and now they've improved it over 7x again, along with the on-screen drawing. That's what I've always loved about Opera; UI responsivess and the smoothness of browsing (scrolling, mouse gestures) beats every other browser and everything is thighly packed in, so no need for clumsy addons which quality and speed differ a lot.</p><p>However, the <a href="http://labs.opera.com/news/2009/12/22/win7\_new\_addressbar.jpg" title="opera.com">preview</a> [opera.com] images seem to have the Windows 7 like layout. I really hope this is just to show it off and it can be switched to normal - I like having my menubars easily accessible.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Complete What 's new : CarakanCarakan is our new JavaScript engine .
It    s fast , more than 7x faster in SunSpider than Opera 10.10 with Futhark on Windows ( Mac optimization is not as far along ) .
You can read more gritty details regarding register-based bytecode , automatic object classification and native code generation in the Opera Core blog.Presto 2.5We are now using Presto 2.5 , which contains a huge numbers of improvements .
It also includes support for CSS3 transitions and transforms , and more HTML5 features like persistent storage.VegaVega is our new graphics library .
It    s currently software based and displays everything you see on-screen .
Vega can be hardware accelerated , but as you can see from the complex graphics benchmark in Peacekeeper , we don    t seem to need it yet .
( Note that Futuremarks Peacekeeper test does no include the results of their complex graphics tests in the overall score .
We believe this is wrong in 2009 and will simply be silly if not changed in 2010 .
) Outside - Platform integrationOn Windows 7/Vista , you will notice a lot of visual changes and use of APIs which allow the UI to display the Aero Glass effect .
For Windows 7 , we also added Aero Peek and Jump List support to easily access your Speed Dials , Tabs , etc .
from the Taskbar.For Mac , a complete rewrite in Cocoa brings an Unified Toolbar , native buttons and scrollbars , multi-touch gestures ( try 3-Finger Swipe Left/Right or Pinch to zoom ) and a bunch of other small details .
We also added Growl notification support.    Private tab    and    Private window    You can open a new Private tab or Private window that forgets everything that happened on it once closed.Non-modal dialogsDialog boxes ( JavaScript alerts , HTTP authentication , etc .
) are now non-modal and are displayed as a page overlay .
This allows you to switch tabs or windows while the dialog is still displayed .
Similarly , the Password Manager dialog is now anchored at the top of the page won    t block any content as it loads a new page.Address field and Search field improvementsBoth fields have been upgraded in looks and functionality .
They can now remember searches , support removing items from history and show results in a better layout.Opera just keeps getting better and better .
It was in some Opera 10 beta that they improved the JS engine a lot , and now they 've improved it over 7x again , along with the on-screen drawing .
That 's what I 've always loved about Opera ; UI responsivess and the smoothness of browsing ( scrolling , mouse gestures ) beats every other browser and everything is thighly packed in , so no need for clumsy addons which quality and speed differ a lot.However , the preview [ opera.com ] images seem to have the Windows 7 like layout .
I really hope this is just to show it off and it can be switched to normal - I like having my menubars easily accessible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Complete What's new:CarakanCarakan is our new JavaScript engine.
It’s fast, more than 7x faster in SunSpider than Opera 10.10 with Futhark on Windows (Mac optimization is not as far along).
You can read more gritty details regarding register-based bytecode, automatic object classification and native code generation in the Opera Core blog.Presto 2.5We are now using Presto 2.5, which contains a huge numbers of improvements.
It also includes support for CSS3 transitions and transforms, and more HTML5 features like persistent storage.VegaVega is our new graphics library.
It’s currently software based and displays everything you see on-screen.
Vega can be hardware accelerated, but as you can see from the complex graphics benchmark in Peacekeeper, we don’t seem to need it yet.
(Note that Futuremarks Peacekeeper test does no include the results of their complex graphics tests in the overall score.
We believe this is wrong in 2009 and will simply be silly if not changed in 2010.
)Outside - Platform integrationOn Windows 7/Vista, you will notice a lot of visual changes and use of APIs which allow the UI to display the Aero Glass effect.
For Windows 7, we also added Aero Peek and Jump List support to easily access your Speed Dials, Tabs, etc.
from the Taskbar.For Mac, a complete rewrite in Cocoa brings an Unified Toolbar, native buttons and scrollbars, multi-touch gestures (try 3-Finger Swipe Left/Right or Pinch to zoom) and a bunch of other small details.
We also added Growl notification support.“Private tab” and “Private window”You can open a new Private tab or Private window that forgets everything that happened on it once closed.Non-modal dialogsDialog boxes (JavaScript alerts, HTTP authentication, etc.
) are now non-modal and are displayed as a page overlay.
This allows you to switch tabs or windows while the dialog is still displayed.
Similarly, the Password Manager dialog is now anchored at the top of the page won’t block any content as it loads a new page.Address field and Search field improvementsBoth fields have been upgraded in looks and functionality.
They can now remember searches, support removing items from history and show results in a better layout.Opera just keeps getting better and better.
It was in some Opera 10 beta that they improved the JS engine a lot, and now they've improved it over 7x again, along with the on-screen drawing.
That's what I've always loved about Opera; UI responsivess and the smoothness of browsing (scrolling, mouse gestures) beats every other browser and everything is thighly packed in, so no need for clumsy addons which quality and speed differ a lot.However, the preview [opera.com] images seem to have the Windows 7 like layout.
I really hope this is just to show it off and it can be switched to normal - I like having my menubars easily accessible.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534968</id>
	<title>Re:I tried it out earlier</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259767980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, somebody's about to get scarred for life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , somebody 's about to get scarred for life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, somebody's about to get scarred for life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532458</id>
	<title>Fast?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261501560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Opera 3.x versions were fast. It's turned into a bloated monster since. Just because it's running a little faster than all the other bloated monsters doesnt mean it's fast.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Opera 3.x versions were fast .
It 's turned into a bloated monster since .
Just because it 's running a little faster than all the other bloated monsters doesnt mean it 's fast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Opera 3.x versions were fast.
It's turned into a bloated monster since.
Just because it's running a little faster than all the other bloated monsters doesnt mean it's fast.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531718</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>Jah-Wren Ryel</author>
	<datestamp>1261492260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>major feature is ability to set pages from history to be always loaded from cache, which allows to recover forum/slashdot/tracker/bugzilla messages if some problem occurs</p></div><p>Is that on a per-page basis?  Because you can do it globally in firefox with "Work Offline" under the File menu, I can't think of a time that feature wasn't there.  I think it was even there in the netscape days.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>major feature is ability to set pages from history to be always loaded from cache , which allows to recover forum/slashdot/tracker/bugzilla messages if some problem occursIs that on a per-page basis ?
Because you can do it globally in firefox with " Work Offline " under the File menu , I ca n't think of a time that feature was n't there .
I think it was even there in the netscape days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>major feature is ability to set pages from history to be always loaded from cache, which allows to recover forum/slashdot/tracker/bugzilla messages if some problem occursIs that on a per-page basis?
Because you can do it globally in firefox with "Work Offline" under the File menu, I can't think of a time that feature wasn't there.
I think it was even there in the netscape days.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30536516</id>
	<title>Re:FAIL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259777220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another genius that installs pre-alpha software without actually reading the release info. From the Opera Labs post:</p><p>Some specific known issues:<br>-High memory usage<br>-No JIT (slow performance) on old processors without SSE2<br>-No printing for Mac build</p><p>Looks familiar?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another genius that installs pre-alpha software without actually reading the release info .
From the Opera Labs post : Some specific known issues : -High memory usage-No JIT ( slow performance ) on old processors without SSE2-No printing for Mac buildLooks familiar ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another genius that installs pre-alpha software without actually reading the release info.
From the Opera Labs post:Some specific known issues:-High memory usage-No JIT (slow performance) on old processors without SSE2-No printing for Mac buildLooks familiar?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531940</id>
	<title>Get faster?</title>
	<author>Stan92057</author>
	<datestamp>1261495140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sense its a Pre alpha, shouldn't it get slower as they add more features,not faster?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sense its a Pre alpha , should n't it get slower as they add more features,not faster ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sense its a Pre alpha, shouldn't it get slower as they add more features,not faster?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532616</id>
	<title>Opera developement, or going the wrong way?</title>
	<author>Ekuryua</author>
	<datestamp>1261503420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It has always bugged me that opera devs. always focus on benchmark numbers when their browser is already acclaimed for being more than fast enough.
What about ACTUAL features that users have been begging for, for 5 or 6 versions.
Like a decent extension framework.(this is probably something they must have some sort of magical curse to not do, since they're ignoring people since the beginning)
Like a lot more control over ui customization.(try getting the menu next to your buttons so as not to waste a full row, and no, fake menus made of buttons do not behave like menus)<br>
Like type as you find?(or did they finally add that one?)<br>
<br>
Features wise, opera only seems to like adding stuff pertinent to a select few, and ignore the rest of the world.<br>
<br>
It's just a browser that needs to get out of the dark age of control-is-security.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It has always bugged me that opera devs .
always focus on benchmark numbers when their browser is already acclaimed for being more than fast enough .
What about ACTUAL features that users have been begging for , for 5 or 6 versions .
Like a decent extension framework .
( this is probably something they must have some sort of magical curse to not do , since they 're ignoring people since the beginning ) Like a lot more control over ui customization .
( try getting the menu next to your buttons so as not to waste a full row , and no , fake menus made of buttons do not behave like menus ) Like type as you find ?
( or did they finally add that one ?
) Features wise , opera only seems to like adding stuff pertinent to a select few , and ignore the rest of the world .
It 's just a browser that needs to get out of the dark age of control-is-security .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has always bugged me that opera devs.
always focus on benchmark numbers when their browser is already acclaimed for being more than fast enough.
What about ACTUAL features that users have been begging for, for 5 or 6 versions.
Like a decent extension framework.
(this is probably something they must have some sort of magical curse to not do, since they're ignoring people since the beginning)
Like a lot more control over ui customization.
(try getting the menu next to your buttons so as not to waste a full row, and no, fake menus made of buttons do not behave like menus)
Like type as you find?
(or did they finally add that one?
)

Features wise, opera only seems to like adding stuff pertinent to a select few, and ignore the rest of the world.
It's just a browser that needs to get out of the dark age of control-is-security.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530208</id>
	<title>Cool.</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1261481700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it FOSS?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it FOSS ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it FOSS?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531254</id>
	<title>CSS?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261487820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any support for border-radius, box-shadow, text-shadow?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any support for border-radius , box-shadow , text-shadow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any support for border-radius, box-shadow, text-shadow?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530090</id>
	<title>Re:I tried it out earlier</title>
	<author>Compuser</author>
	<datestamp>1261481220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What do you mean by "ability to tile tabs vertically"? Did they finally add vertical tabs on the side of the window rather than on top? I am too lazy to install alpha releases so it would be nice to know from someone who has gone to the trouble.</p><p>And I agree with other comments: the first thing I think of when presented with an image of honey on skin is "sticky" not smooth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What do you mean by " ability to tile tabs vertically " ?
Did they finally add vertical tabs on the side of the window rather than on top ?
I am too lazy to install alpha releases so it would be nice to know from someone who has gone to the trouble.And I agree with other comments : the first thing I think of when presented with an image of honey on skin is " sticky " not smooth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do you mean by "ability to tile tabs vertically"?
Did they finally add vertical tabs on the side of the window rather than on top?
I am too lazy to install alpha releases so it would be nice to know from someone who has gone to the trouble.And I agree with other comments: the first thing I think of when presented with an image of honey on skin is "sticky" not smooth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530722</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1261484220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>However, the preview [opera.com] images seem to have the Windows 7 like layout. I really hope this is just to show it off and it can be switched to normal - I like having my menubars easily accessible.</p></div><p>It's nothing new - they've had the option to hide the menu bar for God knows how long (since 7.x, I think? maybe even before that), it was just buried deep - it was an UI command with no key bound by default, so you had to bind it first. In 10.0, they've added the option to hide main menu to the menu itself. And in this build, they've made that setting the default, but you can, of course, change it back (and generally change the UI to look like it used to be).</p><p>Note though that menu is still accessible with mouse only - that Opera logo in top left corner, when clicked, shows all the items normally displayed on the main menu in a popup menu. In that, it's quite similar to Ribbon "pearl" button. So it's better than IE, where you have to use keyboard (Alt or F10) to activate the hidden menu.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , the preview [ opera.com ] images seem to have the Windows 7 like layout .
I really hope this is just to show it off and it can be switched to normal - I like having my menubars easily accessible.It 's nothing new - they 've had the option to hide the menu bar for God knows how long ( since 7.x , I think ?
maybe even before that ) , it was just buried deep - it was an UI command with no key bound by default , so you had to bind it first .
In 10.0 , they 've added the option to hide main menu to the menu itself .
And in this build , they 've made that setting the default , but you can , of course , change it back ( and generally change the UI to look like it used to be ) .Note though that menu is still accessible with mouse only - that Opera logo in top left corner , when clicked , shows all the items normally displayed on the main menu in a popup menu .
In that , it 's quite similar to Ribbon " pearl " button .
So it 's better than IE , where you have to use keyboard ( Alt or F10 ) to activate the hidden menu .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, the preview [opera.com] images seem to have the Windows 7 like layout.
I really hope this is just to show it off and it can be switched to normal - I like having my menubars easily accessible.It's nothing new - they've had the option to hide the menu bar for God knows how long (since 7.x, I think?
maybe even before that), it was just buried deep - it was an UI command with no key bound by default, so you had to bind it first.
In 10.0, they've added the option to hide main menu to the menu itself.
And in this build, they've made that setting the default, but you can, of course, change it back (and generally change the UI to look like it used to be).Note though that menu is still accessible with mouse only - that Opera logo in top left corner, when clicked, shows all the items normally displayed on the main menu in a popup menu.
In that, it's quite similar to Ribbon "pearl" button.
So it's better than IE, where you have to use keyboard (Alt or F10) to activate the hidden menu.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531426</id>
	<title>It's fast is it?</title>
	<author>Slutticus</author>
	<datestamp>1261489380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So basically... pages are incorrectly rendered at an even faster rate, causing me to open Safari quicker for those pesky webpages that I shouldn't be using anyway?

I can't wait!

*this is from a frustrated Opera user...*</htmltext>
<tokenext>So basically... pages are incorrectly rendered at an even faster rate , causing me to open Safari quicker for those pesky webpages that I should n't be using anyway ?
I ca n't wait !
* this is from a frustrated Opera user... *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So basically... pages are incorrectly rendered at an even faster rate, causing me to open Safari quicker for those pesky webpages that I shouldn't be using anyway?
I can't wait!
*this is from a frustrated Opera user...*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30540020</id>
	<title>Re:FAIL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259756520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must have used a leaked build (20192) without their new JS. Go and grap proper verison from http://labs.opera.com/news/2009/12/22/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must have used a leaked build ( 20192 ) without their new JS .
Go and grap proper verison from http : //labs.opera.com/news/2009/12/22/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must have used a leaked build (20192) without their new JS.
Go and grap proper verison from http://labs.opera.com/news/2009/12/22/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533736</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259749680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>then there's (built-in) ability to disable all images by default (enabling cached only ones !) and switch this on tab basis easily - awesome feature when using dog slow gprs.</p></div><p>Don't forget Opera Turbo when using dog-slow GPRS.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>then there 's ( built-in ) ability to disable all images by default ( enabling cached only ones !
) and switch this on tab basis easily - awesome feature when using dog slow gprs.Do n't forget Opera Turbo when using dog-slow GPRS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>then there's (built-in) ability to disable all images by default (enabling cached only ones !
) and switch this on tab basis easily - awesome feature when using dog slow gprs.Don't forget Opera Turbo when using dog-slow GPRS.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30539318</id>
	<title>Re:Does it have Adblock?</title>
	<author>Zoidbot</author>
	<datestamp>1259751540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Firefox is a massive resource hog.  With more tha 2 tabs open for a while, it will consume vast amounts of memory.</p><p>Opera is a breath of fresh air.  10.10 is rock solid and fast, 10.50 is (currently) unstable, but faster than anything around, including the previous king, Chrome, and Opera have already said there is still more gains to be had and planty of debug to remove.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Firefox is a massive resource hog .
With more tha 2 tabs open for a while , it will consume vast amounts of memory.Opera is a breath of fresh air .
10.10 is rock solid and fast , 10.50 is ( currently ) unstable , but faster than anything around , including the previous king , Chrome , and Opera have already said there is still more gains to be had and planty of debug to remove .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Firefox is a massive resource hog.
With more tha 2 tabs open for a while, it will consume vast amounts of memory.Opera is a breath of fresh air.
10.10 is rock solid and fast, 10.50 is (currently) unstable, but faster than anything around, including the previous king, Chrome, and Opera have already said there is still more gains to be had and planty of debug to remove.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531056</id>
	<title>Re:I tried it out earlier</title>
	<author>lagfest</author>
	<datestamp>1261486380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got mod points, but I couldn't find +1 disturbing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got mod points , but I could n't find + 1 disturbing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got mod points, but I couldn't find +1 disturbing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531370</id>
	<title>By "fast", let's hope they don't mean...</title>
	<author>rnturn</author>
	<datestamp>1261488900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... that the Error Console window now pops up before the main browser window begins rendering. It's <i>almost</i> that fast now in Opera 10.10. Now I rarely even begin reading a web page because that window is bound to pop up in the middle of my reading the first paragraph of text. It used to be annoying as all get out until I realized if I merely minimize it, instead of closing it, I only have to look at it once per browser session. Making it possible to control how sensitive Opera is to minor errors should be possible so users can avoid having to deal with the annoying error console. Either that or allow us to choose to route all the error console messages to a log file and not even open the darned console window. IMHO, that would be a more welcome feature than having a built-in web server.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... that the Error Console window now pops up before the main browser window begins rendering .
It 's almost that fast now in Opera 10.10 .
Now I rarely even begin reading a web page because that window is bound to pop up in the middle of my reading the first paragraph of text .
It used to be annoying as all get out until I realized if I merely minimize it , instead of closing it , I only have to look at it once per browser session .
Making it possible to control how sensitive Opera is to minor errors should be possible so users can avoid having to deal with the annoying error console .
Either that or allow us to choose to route all the error console messages to a log file and not even open the darned console window .
IMHO , that would be a more welcome feature than having a built-in web server .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that the Error Console window now pops up before the main browser window begins rendering.
It's almost that fast now in Opera 10.10.
Now I rarely even begin reading a web page because that window is bound to pop up in the middle of my reading the first paragraph of text.
It used to be annoying as all get out until I realized if I merely minimize it, instead of closing it, I only have to look at it once per browser session.
Making it possible to control how sensitive Opera is to minor errors should be possible so users can avoid having to deal with the annoying error console.
Either that or allow us to choose to route all the error console messages to a log file and not even open the darned console window.
IMHO, that would be a more welcome feature than having a built-in web server.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529480</id>
	<title>It's fast but buggy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261478340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm a regular Chrome user.  I've tried Opera 10.5 pre-alpha for the last few hours, and I find it at least as snappy on my regular rounds of javascript heavy websites.

I also really like the trend in browsers toward simple UI, with no real estate wasted on menubars.  The new Opera looks almost as minimalistic as Chrome.  Nice.

However, be warned, this early build really is wonky.  Lots of small errors and things that simply don't work. Don't uninstall your main browser just yet.

But, I think you might be able to rely on this pre-alpha build of Opera as your (superfast) gmail client, and then have another browser open for your browsing needs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a regular Chrome user .
I 've tried Opera 10.5 pre-alpha for the last few hours , and I find it at least as snappy on my regular rounds of javascript heavy websites .
I also really like the trend in browsers toward simple UI , with no real estate wasted on menubars .
The new Opera looks almost as minimalistic as Chrome .
Nice . However , be warned , this early build really is wonky .
Lots of small errors and things that simply do n't work .
Do n't uninstall your main browser just yet .
But , I think you might be able to rely on this pre-alpha build of Opera as your ( superfast ) gmail client , and then have another browser open for your browsing needs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a regular Chrome user.
I've tried Opera 10.5 pre-alpha for the last few hours, and I find it at least as snappy on my regular rounds of javascript heavy websites.
I also really like the trend in browsers toward simple UI, with no real estate wasted on menubars.
The new Opera looks almost as minimalistic as Chrome.
Nice.

However, be warned, this early build really is wonky.
Lots of small errors and things that simply don't work.
Don't uninstall your main browser just yet.
But, I think you might be able to rely on this pre-alpha build of Opera as your (superfast) gmail client, and then have another browser open for your browsing needs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533286</id>
	<title>Re:Does it have Adblock?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259784780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sort of yes.  It's not "Adblock" but you can prevent the browser from loading content from any URL pattern you like by using their Blocked Content feature.  You can do this by clicking on elements on the page, or by entering the patterns yourself.  Also, both globally and for any site (URL pattern) you can configure things like if you want to run scripts and what priveledges you give them, run addons, load images, cookies, referrer, browser string, frames support, css support, custom css, etc, etc.  That's for every site.  I love that.</p><p>Then again, maybe other browsers support that too, but evey one I've tried was either buggy, slow, or didn't run on all my platforms so I haven't looked back since about 2000 or so and not once yet been able to tell me "oh, your browser doesn't support X?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sort of yes .
It 's not " Adblock " but you can prevent the browser from loading content from any URL pattern you like by using their Blocked Content feature .
You can do this by clicking on elements on the page , or by entering the patterns yourself .
Also , both globally and for any site ( URL pattern ) you can configure things like if you want to run scripts and what priveledges you give them , run addons , load images , cookies , referrer , browser string , frames support , css support , custom css , etc , etc .
That 's for every site .
I love that.Then again , maybe other browsers support that too , but evey one I 've tried was either buggy , slow , or did n't run on all my platforms so I have n't looked back since about 2000 or so and not once yet been able to tell me " oh , your browser does n't support X ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sort of yes.
It's not "Adblock" but you can prevent the browser from loading content from any URL pattern you like by using their Blocked Content feature.
You can do this by clicking on elements on the page, or by entering the patterns yourself.
Also, both globally and for any site (URL pattern) you can configure things like if you want to run scripts and what priveledges you give them, run addons, load images, cookies, referrer, browser string, frames support, css support, custom css, etc, etc.
That's for every site.
I love that.Then again, maybe other browsers support that too, but evey one I've tried was either buggy, slow, or didn't run on all my platforms so I haven't looked back since about 2000 or so and not once yet been able to tell me "oh, your browser doesn't support X?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529656</id>
	<title>Re:I tried it out earlier</title>
	<author>Mystra\_x64</author>
	<datestamp>1261479180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hardware acceleration is not enabled yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hardware acceleration is not enabled yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hardware acceleration is not enabled yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531936</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>TheTyrannyOfForcedRe</author>
	<datestamp>1261495080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That's what I've always loved about Opera; UI responsivess and the smoothness of browsing (scrolling, mouse gestures) beats every other browser</p></div><p>Sorry but Chrome murders Opera on UI responsiveness, smoothness of browsing, and speed in general.  I dumped Opera months ago because it feels laggy next to Chrome.  I dearly miss mouse gestures but I expect that Chrome will get them eventually.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what I 've always loved about Opera ; UI responsivess and the smoothness of browsing ( scrolling , mouse gestures ) beats every other browserSorry but Chrome murders Opera on UI responsiveness , smoothness of browsing , and speed in general .
I dumped Opera months ago because it feels laggy next to Chrome .
I dearly miss mouse gestures but I expect that Chrome will get them eventually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what I've always loved about Opera; UI responsivess and the smoothness of browsing (scrolling, mouse gestures) beats every other browserSorry but Chrome murders Opera on UI responsiveness, smoothness of browsing, and speed in general.
I dumped Opera months ago because it feels laggy next to Chrome.
I dearly miss mouse gestures but I expect that Chrome will get them eventually.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530824</id>
	<title>About Opera's GUI</title>
	<author>thc4k</author>
	<datestamp>1261484880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love two things about Opera: One is integrated www, email and rss and the other is it that it's one of the most customizable software I've ever seen. You can change *every* keyboard/mouse/mouse-gesture setting and you can customize *every* ui element (and with a good menu to do so, too).</p><p>For software i spend hours each day using, like a browser, I think the most important thing is a good user interface - and there is no better one than the one you built yourself. But it kinda makes talking about the interface pointless - spend 10 minutes with it and it will look like (your personal version of) perfection.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love two things about Opera : One is integrated www , email and rss and the other is it that it 's one of the most customizable software I 've ever seen .
You can change * every * keyboard/mouse/mouse-gesture setting and you can customize * every * ui element ( and with a good menu to do so , too ) .For software i spend hours each day using , like a browser , I think the most important thing is a good user interface - and there is no better one than the one you built yourself .
But it kinda makes talking about the interface pointless - spend 10 minutes with it and it will look like ( your personal version of ) perfection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love two things about Opera: One is integrated www, email and rss and the other is it that it's one of the most customizable software I've ever seen.
You can change *every* keyboard/mouse/mouse-gesture setting and you can customize *every* ui element (and with a good menu to do so, too).For software i spend hours each day using, like a browser, I think the most important thing is a good user interface - and there is no better one than the one you built yourself.
But it kinda makes talking about the interface pointless - spend 10 minutes with it and it will look like (your personal version of) perfection.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530482</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1261482840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I started using Opera before Firefox existed - long before it became trendy to switch from IE.</p><p>I'm not saying Firefox is a bad browser, but why should I switch over from Opera? Where's the killer feature?</p><p>(PS - Opera had tabbed browsing way earlier too, although it didn't use that terminology. And if you want an example of something Firefox still doesn't do, you don't have any flexibility over arranging the tabs, they always have to be full size, where as Opera allows you to resized the tabs, allowing you to view them side. Of course it's not a killer feature, but for heaven's sake, it's 2009 - browsers are mature, and no one browser is going to have a killer feature anymore.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I started using Opera before Firefox existed - long before it became trendy to switch from IE.I 'm not saying Firefox is a bad browser , but why should I switch over from Opera ?
Where 's the killer feature ?
( PS - Opera had tabbed browsing way earlier too , although it did n't use that terminology .
And if you want an example of something Firefox still does n't do , you do n't have any flexibility over arranging the tabs , they always have to be full size , where as Opera allows you to resized the tabs , allowing you to view them side .
Of course it 's not a killer feature , but for heaven 's sake , it 's 2009 - browsers are mature , and no one browser is going to have a killer feature anymore .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I started using Opera before Firefox existed - long before it became trendy to switch from IE.I'm not saying Firefox is a bad browser, but why should I switch over from Opera?
Where's the killer feature?
(PS - Opera had tabbed browsing way earlier too, although it didn't use that terminology.
And if you want an example of something Firefox still doesn't do, you don't have any flexibility over arranging the tabs, they always have to be full size, where as Opera allows you to resized the tabs, allowing you to view them side.
Of course it's not a killer feature, but for heaven's sake, it's 2009 - browsers are mature, and no one browser is going to have a killer feature anymore.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30543530</id>
	<title>LLVM</title>
	<author>badkarmadayaccount</author>
	<datestamp>1261667040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anybody hoping Mozilla port Tracemonkey's IR generator to LLVM IR, and short circuit tracing to compile the whole thing, V8 style, so we can all see what real speed means?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anybody hoping Mozilla port Tracemonkey 's IR generator to LLVM IR , and short circuit tracing to compile the whole thing , V8 style , so we can all see what real speed means ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anybody hoping Mozilla port Tracemonkey's IR generator to LLVM IR, and short circuit tracing to compile the whole thing, V8 style, so we can all see what real speed means?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532498</id>
	<title>Re:I tried it out earlier</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261501980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Pages animate and scroll so smooth you'd swear it was warm honey running down Kiera Knightly's body.</p></div><p>Delightful though Ms. Knightly is, it's probably worth pointing out that said "warm honey" would not have it's path inhibited by breasts or anything -- nope, a completely flat path there!<br>
<br>
So in short, Kiera Knightly is <a href="http://home.comcast.net/~speedyturkey/nothitit.jpg" title="comcast.net" rel="nofollow">way below my standards!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D </a> [comcast.net]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pages animate and scroll so smooth you 'd swear it was warm honey running down Kiera Knightly 's body.Delightful though Ms. Knightly is , it 's probably worth pointing out that said " warm honey " would not have it 's path inhibited by breasts or anything -- nope , a completely flat path there !
So in short , Kiera Knightly is way below my standards !
: D [ comcast.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pages animate and scroll so smooth you'd swear it was warm honey running down Kiera Knightly's body.Delightful though Ms. Knightly is, it's probably worth pointing out that said "warm honey" would not have it's path inhibited by breasts or anything -- nope, a completely flat path there!
So in short, Kiera Knightly is way below my standards!
:D  [comcast.net]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533276</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>Randle\_Revar</author>
	<datestamp>1259784540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really? Over here on Linux, session restore has worked perfectly since 3.0 (I have seen that dialog maybe twice, and they came back fine anyway). But then, the Flash 10 64-bit beta on Linux seems to be more stable than the released Flash 10 on Windows...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
Over here on Linux , session restore has worked perfectly since 3.0 ( I have seen that dialog maybe twice , and they came back fine anyway ) .
But then , the Flash 10 64-bit beta on Linux seems to be more stable than the released Flash 10 on Windows.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
Over here on Linux, session restore has worked perfectly since 3.0 (I have seen that dialog maybe twice, and they came back fine anyway).
But then, the Flash 10 64-bit beta on Linux seems to be more stable than the released Flash 10 on Windows...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530660</id>
	<title>Re:Pre Alpha??</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1261483920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Beta is when you let outsiders test your product. Closed if you are controlling who and how many, open if you aren't.</p><p>Alpha is internal testing.</p></div><p>I've no idea where you've got those definitions from. The ones that I traditionally see being thrown around are:</p><p>Alpha - feature set not frozen, planned features may be missing, likely to have bugs; released to get feedback on new/changed features and new feature requests.</p><p>Beta - feature set frozen, likely to have bugs; released to get bug reports.</p><p>RC - feature set frozen, no known bugs except for those deemed non-release-critical and postponed for next release; if no more release-critical bugs found in a set period of time, this becomes release.</p><p>Now in practice, today, everyone is using "alpha" and "beta" essentially at random, and even "RC" can mean "beta" occasionally (heck, "release" can mean "beta" - see Vista; and it can even mean "alpha" - see KDE 4.0). But Opera guys actually use the terms in their traditional meaning: their alphas aren't feature-complete, their betas usually are, and their RCs tend to really be release candidates.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Beta is when you let outsiders test your product .
Closed if you are controlling who and how many , open if you are n't.Alpha is internal testing.I 've no idea where you 've got those definitions from .
The ones that I traditionally see being thrown around are : Alpha - feature set not frozen , planned features may be missing , likely to have bugs ; released to get feedback on new/changed features and new feature requests.Beta - feature set frozen , likely to have bugs ; released to get bug reports.RC - feature set frozen , no known bugs except for those deemed non-release-critical and postponed for next release ; if no more release-critical bugs found in a set period of time , this becomes release.Now in practice , today , everyone is using " alpha " and " beta " essentially at random , and even " RC " can mean " beta " occasionally ( heck , " release " can mean " beta " - see Vista ; and it can even mean " alpha " - see KDE 4.0 ) .
But Opera guys actually use the terms in their traditional meaning : their alphas are n't feature-complete , their betas usually are , and their RCs tend to really be release candidates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Beta is when you let outsiders test your product.
Closed if you are controlling who and how many, open if you aren't.Alpha is internal testing.I've no idea where you've got those definitions from.
The ones that I traditionally see being thrown around are:Alpha - feature set not frozen, planned features may be missing, likely to have bugs; released to get feedback on new/changed features and new feature requests.Beta - feature set frozen, likely to have bugs; released to get bug reports.RC - feature set frozen, no known bugs except for those deemed non-release-critical and postponed for next release; if no more release-critical bugs found in a set period of time, this becomes release.Now in practice, today, everyone is using "alpha" and "beta" essentially at random, and even "RC" can mean "beta" occasionally (heck, "release" can mean "beta" - see Vista; and it can even mean "alpha" - see KDE 4.0).
But Opera guys actually use the terms in their traditional meaning: their alphas aren't feature-complete, their betas usually are, and their RCs tend to really be release candidates.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529646</id>
	<title>Re:I tried it out earlier</title>
	<author>Ethanol-fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1261479120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mmmmmm, but can it be warm honey running down Brittany Murphy's body instead? <br> <br>

Nom nom nom.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mmmmmm , but can it be warm honey running down Brittany Murphy 's body instead ?
Nom nom nom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mmmmmm, but can it be warm honey running down Brittany Murphy's body instead?
Nom nom nom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529790</id>
	<title>Re:Alpha</title>
	<author>ezelkow1</author>
	<datestamp>1261479720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is what I assume as well.  At this stage most of their logic is pretty sound and I dont think any of their engines are going to drastically change, however as they start adding more things running in the background things are going to start slowing down more.  Generally you would think the major logic behind an app is done first then all the pretty things that slow it down and functionality that is bolted onto it is added later.
<br> <br>
I remember this being the case with xp, tried out a beta on a 400mhz box with 128mb ram and it ran snappy and just fine.  Final release comes around and it is definitely not the beta it once was.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is what I assume as well .
At this stage most of their logic is pretty sound and I dont think any of their engines are going to drastically change , however as they start adding more things running in the background things are going to start slowing down more .
Generally you would think the major logic behind an app is done first then all the pretty things that slow it down and functionality that is bolted onto it is added later .
I remember this being the case with xp , tried out a beta on a 400mhz box with 128mb ram and it ran snappy and just fine .
Final release comes around and it is definitely not the beta it once was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is what I assume as well.
At this stage most of their logic is pretty sound and I dont think any of their engines are going to drastically change, however as they start adding more things running in the background things are going to start slowing down more.
Generally you would think the major logic behind an app is done first then all the pretty things that slow it down and functionality that is bolted onto it is added later.
I remember this being the case with xp, tried out a beta on a 400mhz box with 128mb ram and it ran snappy and just fine.
Final release comes around and it is definitely not the beta it once was.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533206</id>
	<title>Re:Alpha</title>
	<author>XO</author>
	<datestamp>1261511820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lol, um, no.  alphas and betas are full of debugging facilities that will not be present in the final.  as well as the code itself getting tweaked to run better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lol , um , no .
alphas and betas are full of debugging facilities that will not be present in the final .
as well as the code itself getting tweaked to run better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lol, um, no.
alphas and betas are full of debugging facilities that will not be present in the final.
as well as the code itself getting tweaked to run better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529822</id>
	<title>Re:Does it have Adblock?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261479840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://fanboy.co.nz/adblock/opera/" title="fanboy.co.nz">Fanboy's list works great.</a> [fanboy.co.nz]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fanboy 's list works great .
[ fanboy.co.nz ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fanboy's list works great.
[fanboy.co.nz]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532016</id>
	<title>Re:What's the big deal?</title>
	<author>jp10558</author>
	<datestamp>1261495800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I've used older versions of Opera, say 9.5, on New Slashdot. It's painful. Or try 9.x on some web app interfaces (Like Zenoss Core 2.2 or so) and see how painful it is. Firefox was faster there. I've also seen slowness on other apps, like the js implementation of a NES ROM emulator. So yes, there are things that could certainly be faster.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I 've used older versions of Opera , say 9.5 , on New Slashdot .
It 's painful .
Or try 9.x on some web app interfaces ( Like Zenoss Core 2.2 or so ) and see how painful it is .
Firefox was faster there .
I 've also seen slowness on other apps , like the js implementation of a NES ROM emulator .
So yes , there are things that could certainly be faster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I've used older versions of Opera, say 9.5, on New Slashdot.
It's painful.
Or try 9.x on some web app interfaces (Like Zenoss Core 2.2 or so) and see how painful it is.
Firefox was faster there.
I've also seen slowness on other apps, like the js implementation of a NES ROM emulator.
So yes, there are things that could certainly be faster.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530876</id>
	<title>Re:Does it have Adblock?</title>
	<author>merreborn</author>
	<datestamp>1261485240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Install 6 extensions (especially firebug), and actively browse in at least 6, if not 12 tabs for a day.  If your memory utilization doesn't hit AT LEAST 500 meg after 8 hours, call the editors of the Guiness Book.</p><p>This may sound like an extreme usage pattern, but it's all to common for anyone doing any sort of web development.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Install 6 extensions ( especially firebug ) , and actively browse in at least 6 , if not 12 tabs for a day .
If your memory utilization does n't hit AT LEAST 500 meg after 8 hours , call the editors of the Guiness Book.This may sound like an extreme usage pattern , but it 's all to common for anyone doing any sort of web development .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Install 6 extensions (especially firebug), and actively browse in at least 6, if not 12 tabs for a day.
If your memory utilization doesn't hit AT LEAST 500 meg after 8 hours, call the editors of the Guiness Book.This may sound like an extreme usage pattern, but it's all to common for anyone doing any sort of web development.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30597708</id>
	<title>Re:FAIL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259870280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You failed.</p><p>I've just run the test on a Pentium 4 2.4 GHz (1 GB RAM) and here's the result:</p><p>Total:                  907.0ms +/- 1.5\%</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You failed.I 've just run the test on a Pentium 4 2.4 GHz ( 1 GB RAM ) and here 's the result : Total : 907.0ms + /- 1.5 \ %</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You failed.I've just run the test on a Pentium 4 2.4 GHz (1 GB RAM) and here's the result:Total:                  907.0ms +/- 1.5\%</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530030</id>
	<title>So what?</title>
	<author>kellin</author>
	<datestamp>1261480920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its still Opera, and it probably still sucks.</p><p>At least they stopped trying to get money out of people for their craptastic browser.  I think I tried like v 7 or 8, and couldnt believe how unpleasant it was to surf the net..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its still Opera , and it probably still sucks.At least they stopped trying to get money out of people for their craptastic browser .
I think I tried like v 7 or 8 , and couldnt believe how unpleasant it was to surf the net. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its still Opera, and it probably still sucks.At least they stopped trying to get money out of people for their craptastic browser.
I think I tried like v 7 or 8, and couldnt believe how unpleasant it was to surf the net..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532614</id>
	<title>Re:FAIL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261503360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTFA:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Some specific known issues:<br>High memory usage<br><strong>No JIT (slow performance) on old processors without SSE2</strong><br>No printing for Mac build</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFA : Some specific known issues : High memory usageNo JIT ( slow performance ) on old processors without SSE2No printing for Mac build</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTFA:Some specific known issues:High memory usageNo JIT (slow performance) on old processors without SSE2No printing for Mac build
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531028</id>
	<title>Not available for Linux?</title>
	<author>chrysalis</author>
	<datestamp>1261486200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(and for OpenBSD, etc.)</p><p>It's no biggie, just recompile it!</p><p>Oh wait...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( and for OpenBSD , etc .
) It 's no biggie , just recompile it ! Oh wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(and for OpenBSD, etc.
)It's no biggie, just recompile it!Oh wait...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30535958</id>
	<title>Re:FAIL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259774220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From one of the official posts on my.opera.com: "Known issues: JIT doesn't work on CPU's without SSE2 [...]"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From one of the official posts on my.opera.com : " Known issues : JIT does n't work on CPU 's without SSE2 [ ... ] "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From one of the official posts on my.opera.com: "Known issues: JIT doesn't work on CPU's without SSE2 [...]"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530866</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>Zerimar</author>
	<datestamp>1261485180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's faster, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5432054/opera-105-pre+alpha-is-all-about-speed-and-private-browsing?skyline=true&amp;s=x" title="lifehacker.com" rel="nofollow">according to Lifehacker</a> [lifehacker.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's faster , according to Lifehacker [ lifehacker.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's faster, according to Lifehacker [lifehacker.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>dunezone</author>
	<datestamp>1261480920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wheres the killer feature?
<br>
<br>
Firefox gained popularity because of Tab Browsing and being free. IE lacked Tab Browsing till 2006, and Opera was still Ad-Driven based by the time Firefox was first released in 2004.
<br>
<br>
I am not saying its a bad browser, but why should I switch over from Firefox? What does it have that Firefox doesn't and don't tell me obscure HTML 5 features that are not used yet or speed. Firefox is still pretty fast and acceptable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wheres the killer feature ?
Firefox gained popularity because of Tab Browsing and being free .
IE lacked Tab Browsing till 2006 , and Opera was still Ad-Driven based by the time Firefox was first released in 2004 .
I am not saying its a bad browser , but why should I switch over from Firefox ?
What does it have that Firefox does n't and do n't tell me obscure HTML 5 features that are not used yet or speed .
Firefox is still pretty fast and acceptable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wheres the killer feature?
Firefox gained popularity because of Tab Browsing and being free.
IE lacked Tab Browsing till 2006, and Opera was still Ad-Driven based by the time Firefox was first released in 2004.
I am not saying its a bad browser, but why should I switch over from Firefox?
What does it have that Firefox doesn't and don't tell me obscure HTML 5 features that are not used yet or speed.
Firefox is still pretty fast and acceptable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529588</id>
	<title>Not Even Close To Chrome In Real World Usage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261478880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like every other browser, the latest Opera doesn't come close to Chrome in real world usage for both general speed and specifically Javascript. It is funny though to watch every Browser developer other than Google falling over themselves to get their own cherry picked benchmarks for their niche fanbase to cling to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like every other browser , the latest Opera does n't come close to Chrome in real world usage for both general speed and specifically Javascript .
It is funny though to watch every Browser developer other than Google falling over themselves to get their own cherry picked benchmarks for their niche fanbase to cling to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like every other browser, the latest Opera doesn't come close to Chrome in real world usage for both general speed and specifically Javascript.
It is funny though to watch every Browser developer other than Google falling over themselves to get their own cherry picked benchmarks for their niche fanbase to cling to.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531078</id>
	<title>Re:Pre Alpha??</title>
	<author>richlv</author>
	<datestamp>1261486560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that's an extremely commercial software centric viewpoint. here's one way how most opensource projects would put it.</p><p>alpha : it's just what we are working on. nothing is set in stone, major features might appear or disappear.</p><p>beta : this has a chance to be next stable release. no major features will appear or disappear, but we will fix stuff and change detail here or there.</p><p>release candidate : this will be final release. UNLESS we find critical bug, like major functionality broken or a security bug.</p><p>some projects also include so called "string freeze" - this means that user visible strings - ui text - are "frozen" and not changed, unless some emergency happens. this is usually done to give translators enough time to translate everything, and present a nice, polished translated release. string freeze tends to happen in the time period before first beta and before first rc, depending on project focus.</p><p>all this is not required or inflexible - but it should serve as an illustration why calling alphas "internal only" is not appropriate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that 's an extremely commercial software centric viewpoint .
here 's one way how most opensource projects would put it.alpha : it 's just what we are working on .
nothing is set in stone , major features might appear or disappear.beta : this has a chance to be next stable release .
no major features will appear or disappear , but we will fix stuff and change detail here or there.release candidate : this will be final release .
UNLESS we find critical bug , like major functionality broken or a security bug.some projects also include so called " string freeze " - this means that user visible strings - ui text - are " frozen " and not changed , unless some emergency happens .
this is usually done to give translators enough time to translate everything , and present a nice , polished translated release .
string freeze tends to happen in the time period before first beta and before first rc , depending on project focus.all this is not required or inflexible - but it should serve as an illustration why calling alphas " internal only " is not appropriate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that's an extremely commercial software centric viewpoint.
here's one way how most opensource projects would put it.alpha : it's just what we are working on.
nothing is set in stone, major features might appear or disappear.beta : this has a chance to be next stable release.
no major features will appear or disappear, but we will fix stuff and change detail here or there.release candidate : this will be final release.
UNLESS we find critical bug, like major functionality broken or a security bug.some projects also include so called "string freeze" - this means that user visible strings - ui text - are "frozen" and not changed, unless some emergency happens.
this is usually done to give translators enough time to translate everything, and present a nice, polished translated release.
string freeze tends to happen in the time period before first beta and before first rc, depending on project focus.all this is not required or inflexible - but it should serve as an illustration why calling alphas "internal only" is not appropriate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533952</id>
	<title>Re:Closed source doesn't always suck</title>
	<author>imakemusic</author>
	<datestamp>1259755320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>+5 Insightful?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Adobe is not only slow to fix security holes; it continues to distribute software it knows has holes that are actively being exploited.</p></div><p>True, Flash has issues, but then Adobe also make Photoshop (yeah, GIMP is usable but nowhere near as good), Dreamweaver (actually they bought that one, but it's still closed source), After Effects and a host of other top-notch industry standard software.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>But then I don't use anything closed source anymore, so perhaps I'm missing some other well deserved programs.</p></div><p>So what you're saying is you're talking about something that you don't know about? When was the last time you <em>did</em> use some of this software that you so hate?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 5 Insightful ? Adobe is not only slow to fix security holes ; it continues to distribute software it knows has holes that are actively being exploited.True , Flash has issues , but then Adobe also make Photoshop ( yeah , GIMP is usable but nowhere near as good ) , Dreamweaver ( actually they bought that one , but it 's still closed source ) , After Effects and a host of other top-notch industry standard software.But then I do n't use anything closed source anymore , so perhaps I 'm missing some other well deserved programs.So what you 're saying is you 're talking about something that you do n't know about ?
When was the last time you did use some of this software that you so hate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+5 Insightful?Adobe is not only slow to fix security holes; it continues to distribute software it knows has holes that are actively being exploited.True, Flash has issues, but then Adobe also make Photoshop (yeah, GIMP is usable but nowhere near as good), Dreamweaver (actually they bought that one, but it's still closed source), After Effects and a host of other top-notch industry standard software.But then I don't use anything closed source anymore, so perhaps I'm missing some other well deserved programs.So what you're saying is you're talking about something that you don't know about?
When was the last time you did use some of this software that you so hate?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532166</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532280</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261499520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It IS being compared to the pre-alpha versions of Safari, Firefox and Chrome. That is what it's faster than.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It IS being compared to the pre-alpha versions of Safari , Firefox and Chrome .
That is what it 's faster than .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It IS being compared to the pre-alpha versions of Safari, Firefox and Chrome.
That is what it's faster than.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618</id>
	<title>Does it have Adblock?</title>
	<author>MrMista\_B</author>
	<datestamp>1261479000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hate to keep harping on this, because I hate Firefox, but I hate intrusive ads even more.</p><p>And by 'Adblock' I don't mean 'sorta like Adblock but not really', but something that straight-out duplicates the functionality, allowing be to block any element of any website anywhere, with nothing more than a right-click and perhaps a wildcard.</p><p>Please, someone save me from RAM slaying bloat of Firefox!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to keep harping on this , because I hate Firefox , but I hate intrusive ads even more.And by 'Adblock ' I do n't mean 'sorta like Adblock but not really ' , but something that straight-out duplicates the functionality , allowing be to block any element of any website anywhere , with nothing more than a right-click and perhaps a wildcard.Please , someone save me from RAM slaying bloat of Firefox !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to keep harping on this, because I hate Firefox, but I hate intrusive ads even more.And by 'Adblock' I don't mean 'sorta like Adblock but not really', but something that straight-out duplicates the functionality, allowing be to block any element of any website anywhere, with nothing more than a right-click and perhaps a wildcard.Please, someone save me from RAM slaying bloat of Firefox!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534066</id>
	<title>Re:What's the big deal?</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1259757900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are things you can't really measure with technical tests, it's just the feel of it. UI responses instantly and feels fast, unlike FF or IE. Also other thing to consider is how fast the browser can start drawing the page, even while its loading. In Opera you can set this to happen instantly as the data starts coming in. It really brings down the "Geez, this server sure is slow," effect, especially if you're loading large and complicated pages like slashdot.</p><p>But like said, these are things you just feel. Nevertheless it makes a huge difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are things you ca n't really measure with technical tests , it 's just the feel of it .
UI responses instantly and feels fast , unlike FF or IE .
Also other thing to consider is how fast the browser can start drawing the page , even while its loading .
In Opera you can set this to happen instantly as the data starts coming in .
It really brings down the " Geez , this server sure is slow , " effect , especially if you 're loading large and complicated pages like slashdot.But like said , these are things you just feel .
Nevertheless it makes a huge difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are things you can't really measure with technical tests, it's just the feel of it.
UI responses instantly and feels fast, unlike FF or IE.
Also other thing to consider is how fast the browser can start drawing the page, even while its loading.
In Opera you can set this to happen instantly as the data starts coming in.
It really brings down the "Geez, this server sure is slow," effect, especially if you're loading large and complicated pages like slashdot.But like said, these are things you just feel.
Nevertheless it makes a huge difference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532670</id>
	<title>Re:It's fast but buggy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261504320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;pre-alpha<br>&gt;buggy</p><p>Duh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; pre-alpha &gt; buggyDuh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;pre-alpha&gt;buggyDuh!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530312</id>
	<title>Lacking the best feature of 10</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261482180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The ability to right click a link and drag down thus opening a link in a new tab. This no longer works. Where did it go?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The ability to right click a link and drag down thus opening a link in a new tab .
This no longer works .
Where did it go ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ability to right click a link and drag down thus opening a link in a new tab.
This no longer works.
Where did it go?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533428</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>richlv</author>
	<datestamp>1259787480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's global. and it's completely different from offline mode.</p><p>it basically means that when i go back in my history, my browser does not reload pages, but instead shows them as they were - which is perfect for me. as mentioned, i can recover comments if some error happens, see previous status messages in different systems etc.</p><p>this does not work across sessions, if i close and re-open browser, it reverts to page listing (which seems to be pretty much what firefox does).</p><p>this is not the default behaviour, i have set my history caching to the most aggressive option available, because i find it to be so massively useful. my biggest gripe, and one i have cursed opera developers about a lot - this does not work properly with https sites, even if i have unmarked "always reload https" option.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's global .
and it 's completely different from offline mode.it basically means that when i go back in my history , my browser does not reload pages , but instead shows them as they were - which is perfect for me .
as mentioned , i can recover comments if some error happens , see previous status messages in different systems etc.this does not work across sessions , if i close and re-open browser , it reverts to page listing ( which seems to be pretty much what firefox does ) .this is not the default behaviour , i have set my history caching to the most aggressive option available , because i find it to be so massively useful .
my biggest gripe , and one i have cursed opera developers about a lot - this does not work properly with https sites , even if i have unmarked " always reload https " option .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's global.
and it's completely different from offline mode.it basically means that when i go back in my history, my browser does not reload pages, but instead shows them as they were - which is perfect for me.
as mentioned, i can recover comments if some error happens, see previous status messages in different systems etc.this does not work across sessions, if i close and re-open browser, it reverts to page listing (which seems to be pretty much what firefox does).this is not the default behaviour, i have set my history caching to the most aggressive option available, because i find it to be so massively useful.
my biggest gripe, and one i have cursed opera developers about a lot - this does not work properly with https sites, even if i have unmarked "always reload https" option.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530976</id>
	<title>Re:Pre Alpha??</title>
	<author>not-my-real-name</author>
	<datestamp>1261485900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The nomenclature police are to underfunded to crack down on abuses like this.</p><p>As an aside, I once worked on an aerospace product that had a "Delta Flight Test".  It sounded pretty interesting until I realized that they were just throwing a box on one of Delta Airline's planes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The nomenclature police are to underfunded to crack down on abuses like this.As an aside , I once worked on an aerospace product that had a " Delta Flight Test " .
It sounded pretty interesting until I realized that they were just throwing a box on one of Delta Airline 's planes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The nomenclature police are to underfunded to crack down on abuses like this.As an aside, I once worked on an aerospace product that had a "Delta Flight Test".
It sounded pretty interesting until I realized that they were just throwing a box on one of Delta Airline's planes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530424</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261482600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're on 10 now.  All you've demonstrated is that you've formulated your opinion with your head up your ass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're on 10 now .
All you 've demonstrated is that you 've formulated your opinion with your head up your ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're on 10 now.
All you've demonstrated is that you've formulated your opinion with your head up your ass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531160</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261487160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then you didn't read the right specifications, or you have a very poor understanding of them and web development in general.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then you did n't read the right specifications , or you have a very poor understanding of them and web development in general .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then you didn't read the right specifications, or you have a very poor understanding of them and web development in general.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530102</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>samkass</author>
	<datestamp>1261481220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the pre-alpha version of Opera is faster than the competition, but how does it compare against the <i>pre-alpha</i> versions of Safari, Firefox, and Chrome?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the pre-alpha version of Opera is faster than the competition , but how does it compare against the pre-alpha versions of Safari , Firefox , and Chrome ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the pre-alpha version of Opera is faster than the competition, but how does it compare against the pre-alpha versions of Safari, Firefox, and Chrome?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530214</id>
	<title>Re:Not Even Close To Chrome In Real World Usage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261481700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It is funny though to watch every Browser developer other than Google falling over themselves to get their own cherry picked benchmarks for their niche fanbase to cling to.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Like the V8 benchmark, you mean? LOL.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is funny though to watch every Browser developer other than Google falling over themselves to get their own cherry picked benchmarks for their niche fanbase to cling to .
Like the V8 benchmark , you mean ?
LOL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is funny though to watch every Browser developer other than Google falling over themselves to get their own cherry picked benchmarks for their niche fanbase to cling to.
Like the V8 benchmark, you mean?
LOL.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530340</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261482300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey... 2006 called, they want your comment back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey... 2006 called , they want your comment back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey... 2006 called, they want your comment back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531250</id>
	<title>What's the big deal?</title>
	<author>sevennus</author>
	<datestamp>1261487820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Personally, I've never understood any of this.
<br> <br>
Not once in my 15+ years of using web browsers have I thought to myself "Man, this *browser* sure is slow."
I've definitely said things like "Geez, this server sure is slow," and I've said "Golly, this flash movie is boggin' down my computer."
Is the speed of the browser really making that big of a difference in actual use?  I'm seeing some benchmarks in the post previews for this article, and they don't look like applicable numbers.
<br> <br>
Simply put, answer me this question.  On identical computers, on identical connections, exactly how much quicker or slower than Firefox would Opera be in returning a Google image search for "Cosplay Cammy Big Butt"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally , I 've never understood any of this .
Not once in my 15 + years of using web browsers have I thought to myself " Man , this * browser * sure is slow .
" I 've definitely said things like " Geez , this server sure is slow , " and I 've said " Golly , this flash movie is boggin ' down my computer .
" Is the speed of the browser really making that big of a difference in actual use ?
I 'm seeing some benchmarks in the post previews for this article , and they do n't look like applicable numbers .
Simply put , answer me this question .
On identical computers , on identical connections , exactly how much quicker or slower than Firefox would Opera be in returning a Google image search for " Cosplay Cammy Big Butt " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally, I've never understood any of this.
Not once in my 15+ years of using web browsers have I thought to myself "Man, this *browser* sure is slow.
"
I've definitely said things like "Geez, this server sure is slow," and I've said "Golly, this flash movie is boggin' down my computer.
"
Is the speed of the browser really making that big of a difference in actual use?
I'm seeing some benchmarks in the post previews for this article, and they don't look like applicable numbers.
Simply put, answer me this question.
On identical computers, on identical connections, exactly how much quicker or slower than Firefox would Opera be in returning a Google image search for "Cosplay Cammy Big Butt"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534356</id>
	<title>Opera is worthy along with Chrome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259762940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dont use Opera, but I have tried the latest version 10 and I must say they improved the UI (which I didnt like before). Its fast and perfroms well. Its the great browser that gets no respect. Honestly the slothiest browser these days is Firefox and I like firefox, but its slow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dont use Opera , but I have tried the latest version 10 and I must say they improved the UI ( which I didnt like before ) .
Its fast and perfroms well .
Its the great browser that gets no respect .
Honestly the slothiest browser these days is Firefox and I like firefox , but its slow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dont use Opera, but I have tried the latest version 10 and I must say they improved the UI (which I didnt like before).
Its fast and perfroms well.
Its the great browser that gets no respect.
Honestly the slothiest browser these days is Firefox and I like firefox, but its slow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530368</id>
	<title>Re:I tried it out earlier</title>
	<author>AliasMarlowe</author>
	<datestamp>1261482420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Did they finally add vertical tabs on the side of the window rather than on top?</p></div><p>This was already in earlier versions. I use it in 10.10 in Linux.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did they finally add vertical tabs on the side of the window rather than on top ? This was already in earlier versions .
I use it in 10.10 in Linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did they finally add vertical tabs on the side of the window rather than on top?This was already in earlier versions.
I use it in 10.10 in Linux.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532324</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1261500060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wheres the killer feature?</p> </div><p>The porn tabs... er, I mean, the "private tabs."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wheres the killer feature ?
The porn tabs... er , I mean , the " private tabs .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wheres the killer feature?
The porn tabs... er, I mean, the "private tabs.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529712</id>
	<title>Re:Does it have Adblock?</title>
	<author>benjamindees</author>
	<datestamp>1261479360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Please, someone save me from RAM slaying bloat of Firefox!</p></div><p>Aside from a few sites (cough), I have never witnessed Firefox being anything but snappy and responsive on any OS with a reasonably-powered machine.  How much RAM do you have?</p><p>Firefox on Linux always works well, and on Windows I've seen it use ~250 MB before, but that's fairly reasonable for the average Windows machine these days.  I don't consider my machines to be particularly well-spec'd (a couple are nearly 10 years old), but I'm not trying to run Windows with only 256 MB of RAM either.  What am I missing?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , someone save me from RAM slaying bloat of Firefox ! Aside from a few sites ( cough ) , I have never witnessed Firefox being anything but snappy and responsive on any OS with a reasonably-powered machine .
How much RAM do you have ? Firefox on Linux always works well , and on Windows I 've seen it use ~ 250 MB before , but that 's fairly reasonable for the average Windows machine these days .
I do n't consider my machines to be particularly well-spec 'd ( a couple are nearly 10 years old ) , but I 'm not trying to run Windows with only 256 MB of RAM either .
What am I missing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, someone save me from RAM slaying bloat of Firefox!Aside from a few sites (cough), I have never witnessed Firefox being anything but snappy and responsive on any OS with a reasonably-powered machine.
How much RAM do you have?Firefox on Linux always works well, and on Windows I've seen it use ~250 MB before, but that's fairly reasonable for the average Windows machine these days.
I don't consider my machines to be particularly well-spec'd (a couple are nearly 10 years old), but I'm not trying to run Windows with only 256 MB of RAM either.
What am I missing?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531852</id>
	<title>Re:What's the big deal?</title>
	<author>Vectronic</author>
	<datestamp>1261493700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't actually time this, but there is a noticeable difference, granted I only did a single test in each browser... if I had to make up numbers...</p><p><b>Opera 10.5:</b> 0.7 seconds<br><b>Opera 10.10:</b> 1.0 seconds<br><b>Chromium 4.0:</b> 1.2 seconds<br><b>IExplorer8:</b> 1.5 seconds<br><b>Safari 4.0:</b> 1.6 seconds<br><b>Firefox 3.6 B5:</b> 1.7 seconds</p><p>Though, Safari actually "looks" slower than Firefox because Firefox starts rendering sooner, whereas Safari waits for the full page then displays. For what it's worth, DL 5Mb/UL 1Mb connection... less than a second difference between them all, but for a lot of people that adds up, it's like a little nagging voice that eventually turns into frustration, especially when a website isn't what you were hoping for.</p><p>The actual speed with which the browser GETs and renders a website is probably close to the last reason why Opera is my preferred browser, however, it is the main reason why Chromium is my secondary browser in tandem with the fact that it also starts about as quick as Opera, so I can quickly test something outside of Opera without having to go make coffee while it does so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't actually time this , but there is a noticeable difference , granted I only did a single test in each browser... if I had to make up numbers...Opera 10.5 : 0.7 secondsOpera 10.10 : 1.0 secondsChromium 4.0 : 1.2 secondsIExplorer8 : 1.5 secondsSafari 4.0 : 1.6 secondsFirefox 3.6 B5 : 1.7 secondsThough , Safari actually " looks " slower than Firefox because Firefox starts rendering sooner , whereas Safari waits for the full page then displays .
For what it 's worth , DL 5Mb/UL 1Mb connection... less than a second difference between them all , but for a lot of people that adds up , it 's like a little nagging voice that eventually turns into frustration , especially when a website is n't what you were hoping for.The actual speed with which the browser GETs and renders a website is probably close to the last reason why Opera is my preferred browser , however , it is the main reason why Chromium is my secondary browser in tandem with the fact that it also starts about as quick as Opera , so I can quickly test something outside of Opera without having to go make coffee while it does so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't actually time this, but there is a noticeable difference, granted I only did a single test in each browser... if I had to make up numbers...Opera 10.5: 0.7 secondsOpera 10.10: 1.0 secondsChromium 4.0: 1.2 secondsIExplorer8: 1.5 secondsSafari 4.0: 1.6 secondsFirefox 3.6 B5: 1.7 secondsThough, Safari actually "looks" slower than Firefox because Firefox starts rendering sooner, whereas Safari waits for the full page then displays.
For what it's worth, DL 5Mb/UL 1Mb connection... less than a second difference between them all, but for a lot of people that adds up, it's like a little nagging voice that eventually turns into frustration, especially when a website isn't what you were hoping for.The actual speed with which the browser GETs and renders a website is probably close to the last reason why Opera is my preferred browser, however, it is the main reason why Chromium is my secondary browser in tandem with the fact that it also starts about as quick as Opera, so I can quickly test something outside of Opera without having to go make coffee while it does so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530668</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>Anders</author>
	<datestamp>1261483920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wheres the killer feature?</p></div><p>For some reason, Opera does not have killer features (it had tabbed browsing for ages, and was ridiculed for its MDI UI). Features only become indispensable when someone else copies them.

</p><p>Mouse gestures, vertical tabs, speed, no plugin conflicts, customization -- those are some advantages that I remember. These days I stick with Firefox because it's not too bad, and it's there by default. And RAM is cheap.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wheres the killer feature ? For some reason , Opera does not have killer features ( it had tabbed browsing for ages , and was ridiculed for its MDI UI ) .
Features only become indispensable when someone else copies them .
Mouse gestures , vertical tabs , speed , no plugin conflicts , customization -- those are some advantages that I remember .
These days I stick with Firefox because it 's not too bad , and it 's there by default .
And RAM is cheap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wheres the killer feature?For some reason, Opera does not have killer features (it had tabbed browsing for ages, and was ridiculed for its MDI UI).
Features only become indispensable when someone else copies them.
Mouse gestures, vertical tabs, speed, no plugin conflicts, customization -- those are some advantages that I remember.
These days I stick with Firefox because it's not too bad, and it's there by default.
And RAM is cheap.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529440</id>
	<title>I tried it out earlier</title>
	<author>pwnies</author>
	<datestamp>1261478160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and was quite impressed. Very snappy, a better UI, some very nice tab management capabilities (ability to tile tabs horizontall/vertically, not sure if this was in previous versions or not). However the one thing I was even happier about was their new vega library. If you didn't read over the summary, it's a new graphics library that they're using for 2d animation/rendering which has the capability of being hardware accelerated. If you've tried out the direct2d build of firefox, you'll know how nice this is. Pages animate and scroll so smooth you'd swear it was warm honey running down Kiera Knightly's body.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and was quite impressed .
Very snappy , a better UI , some very nice tab management capabilities ( ability to tile tabs horizontall/vertically , not sure if this was in previous versions or not ) .
However the one thing I was even happier about was their new vega library .
If you did n't read over the summary , it 's a new graphics library that they 're using for 2d animation/rendering which has the capability of being hardware accelerated .
If you 've tried out the direct2d build of firefox , you 'll know how nice this is .
Pages animate and scroll so smooth you 'd swear it was warm honey running down Kiera Knightly 's body .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and was quite impressed.
Very snappy, a better UI, some very nice tab management capabilities (ability to tile tabs horizontall/vertically, not sure if this was in previous versions or not).
However the one thing I was even happier about was their new vega library.
If you didn't read over the summary, it's a new graphics library that they're using for 2d animation/rendering which has the capability of being hardware accelerated.
If you've tried out the direct2d build of firefox, you'll know how nice this is.
Pages animate and scroll so smooth you'd swear it was warm honey running down Kiera Knightly's body.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529544</id>
	<title>Carakan is cross-platform</title>
	<author>A Friendly Troll</author>
	<datestamp>1261478640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Carakan is cross-platform. That cannot be stressed enough. Since Opera is used on a *lot* of devices, from mobile phones, over fridges (!) and airplane entertainment centres, to the Wii, this is truly a major step forward for Opera.</p><p>Looking forward to the final release!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Carakan is cross-platform .
That can not be stressed enough .
Since Opera is used on a * lot * of devices , from mobile phones , over fridges ( !
) and airplane entertainment centres , to the Wii , this is truly a major step forward for Opera.Looking forward to the final release !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Carakan is cross-platform.
That cannot be stressed enough.
Since Opera is used on a *lot* of devices, from mobile phones, over fridges (!
) and airplane entertainment centres, to the Wii, this is truly a major step forward for Opera.Looking forward to the final release!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529852</id>
	<title>Re:Does it have Adblock?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261480020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Opera has a built-in "Ad-block-like feature": Right-click on an empty area of the page, select the option to block content, click on your hated ad, ???, profit.</p><p>Also, there are several ad-block plug-in-ish software for Opera. Try this: http://www.fanboy.co.nz/adblock/opera/</p><p>Or just google "Opea adblock"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Opera has a built-in " Ad-block-like feature " : Right-click on an empty area of the page , select the option to block content , click on your hated ad , ? ?
? , profit.Also , there are several ad-block plug-in-ish software for Opera .
Try this : http : //www.fanboy.co.nz/adblock/opera/Or just google " Opea adblock "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Opera has a built-in "Ad-block-like feature": Right-click on an empty area of the page, select the option to block content, click on your hated ad, ??
?, profit.Also, there are several ad-block plug-in-ish software for Opera.
Try this: http://www.fanboy.co.nz/adblock/opera/Or just google "Opea adblock"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533904</id>
	<title>Re:Does it have Adblock?</title>
	<author>nitio</author>
	<datestamp>1259753880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I have never witnessed Firefox being anything but snappy and responsive on any OS with a reasonably-powered machine</i> <br>
<br>
Define <b>reasonably-powered machine</b>. I have C2D 2.1GHz / 2,5GiB RAM / Running Snow Leopard and Firefox is anything but snappy and responsive. And I'm not even talking about 50+ tabs open with 50\% of them running Flash. I'm talking about 2 windows with about 10 tabs each with mostly static pages (that is, no AJAX or something).<br>
<br>
Firefox still exists in my computer because of my banking needs. Otherwise Chrome does the job perfectly and, guess what, snappy and responsive - can't wait to try this Opera beta though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have never witnessed Firefox being anything but snappy and responsive on any OS with a reasonably-powered machine Define reasonably-powered machine .
I have C2D 2.1GHz / 2,5GiB RAM / Running Snow Leopard and Firefox is anything but snappy and responsive .
And I 'm not even talking about 50 + tabs open with 50 \ % of them running Flash .
I 'm talking about 2 windows with about 10 tabs each with mostly static pages ( that is , no AJAX or something ) .
Firefox still exists in my computer because of my banking needs .
Otherwise Chrome does the job perfectly and , guess what , snappy and responsive - ca n't wait to try this Opera beta though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have never witnessed Firefox being anything but snappy and responsive on any OS with a reasonably-powered machine 

Define reasonably-powered machine.
I have C2D 2.1GHz / 2,5GiB RAM / Running Snow Leopard and Firefox is anything but snappy and responsive.
And I'm not even talking about 50+ tabs open with 50\% of them running Flash.
I'm talking about 2 windows with about 10 tabs each with mostly static pages (that is, no AJAX or something).
Firefox still exists in my computer because of my banking needs.
Otherwise Chrome does the job perfectly and, guess what, snappy and responsive - can't wait to try this Opera beta though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530260</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>piquadratCH</author>
	<datestamp>1261481940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It was in some Opera 10 beta that they improved the JS engine a lot, and now they've improved it over 7x again</p></div></blockquote><p>Makes you wonder what those guys from pypy could do for Python if they got some <a href="http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2009/12/accelerating-pypy-development-by.html" title="blogspot.com">proper funding</a> [blogspot.com] </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was in some Opera 10 beta that they improved the JS engine a lot , and now they 've improved it over 7x againMakes you wonder what those guys from pypy could do for Python if they got some proper funding [ blogspot.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was in some Opera 10 beta that they improved the JS engine a lot, and now they've improved it over 7x againMakes you wonder what those guys from pypy could do for Python if they got some proper funding [blogspot.com] 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533182</id>
	<title>Re:I tried it out earlier</title>
	<author>XO</author>
	<datestamp>1261511400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Open the Sidebar on whichever side you like to have your "Tabs".  Turn off your Tab bar.  Open the "Window List" in your sidebar.</p><p>Alternatively, you may now be able to move the tab bar to the sides, I've never tried.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Open the Sidebar on whichever side you like to have your " Tabs " .
Turn off your Tab bar .
Open the " Window List " in your sidebar.Alternatively , you may now be able to move the tab bar to the sides , I 've never tried .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Open the Sidebar on whichever side you like to have your "Tabs".
Turn off your Tab bar.
Open the "Window List" in your sidebar.Alternatively, you may now be able to move the tab bar to the sides, I've never tried.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529534</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261478580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can you switch the HTML5 "features" like &lt;a ping&gt; and persistent storage off? When I read the HTML5 specifications, it seems to be mainly made for advertisers...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you switch the HTML5 " features " like and persistent storage off ?
When I read the HTML5 specifications , it seems to be mainly made for advertisers.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you switch the HTML5 "features" like  and persistent storage off?
When I read the HTML5 specifications, it seems to be mainly made for advertisers...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533226</id>
	<title>multiple backgrounds!</title>
	<author>MikeFM</author>
	<datestamp>1261511940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like they finally have multiple backgrounds working. Will have to test if it's fixed the other places it was lacking but is a good sign. Have been looking for it since 10.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like they finally have multiple backgrounds working .
Will have to test if it 's fixed the other places it was lacking but is a good sign .
Have been looking for it since 10 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like they finally have multiple backgrounds working.
Will have to test if it's fixed the other places it was lacking but is a good sign.
Have been looking for it since 10.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529642</id>
	<title>Alpha</title>
	<author>MozeeToby</author>
	<datestamp>1261479120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is still pre-alpha, so further speed gains should be expected.</p></div><p>Isn't the opposite ussually the case?  Alphas and betas are often a bit quicker than the final releases.  I've always assumed it is an artifact of trying to tie off issues quickly right before release so maybe this isn't ussually the case with the Opera dev team?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is still pre-alpha , so further speed gains should be expected.Is n't the opposite ussually the case ?
Alphas and betas are often a bit quicker than the final releases .
I 've always assumed it is an artifact of trying to tie off issues quickly right before release so maybe this is n't ussually the case with the Opera dev team ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is still pre-alpha, so further speed gains should be expected.Isn't the opposite ussually the case?
Alphas and betas are often a bit quicker than the final releases.
I've always assumed it is an artifact of trying to tie off issues quickly right before release so maybe this isn't ussually the case with the Opera dev team?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529978</id>
	<title>Re:Not Even Close To Chrome In Real World Usage</title>
	<author>larry bagina</author>
	<datestamp>1261480620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>True.  Chrome is 28\% faster at displaying ads.</htmltext>
<tokenext>True .
Chrome is 28 \ % faster at displaying ads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True.
Chrome is 28\% faster at displaying ads.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530168</id>
	<title>Re:I tried it out earlier</title>
	<author>ShatteredArm</author>
	<datestamp>1261481520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's a morbid fetish you have, given that she's dead and whatnot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a morbid fetish you have , given that she 's dead and whatnot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a morbid fetish you have, given that she's dead and whatnot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533332</id>
	<title>Re:Does it have Adblock?</title>
	<author>Randle\_Revar</author>
	<datestamp>1259785680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On my Linux system, SeaMonkey is using about 830 res, one FF is 830 res, and the other FF is about 190 res. But I have somewhere over 100 tabs open (5 windows) in SeaMonkey, 136 in FF and 46 in the second FF. With my 4 GB of RAM, I am not hitting swap, so I don't really care.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On my Linux system , SeaMonkey is using about 830 res , one FF is 830 res , and the other FF is about 190 res .
But I have somewhere over 100 tabs open ( 5 windows ) in SeaMonkey , 136 in FF and 46 in the second FF .
With my 4 GB of RAM , I am not hitting swap , so I do n't really care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On my Linux system, SeaMonkey is using about 830 res, one FF is 830 res, and the other FF is about 190 res.
But I have somewhere over 100 tabs open (5 windows) in SeaMonkey, 136 in FF and 46 in the second FF.
With my 4 GB of RAM, I am not hitting swap, so I don't really care.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530180</id>
	<title>Re:Does it have Adblock?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261481580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No but...</p><p>Right click, choose "Block content", then select elements on a page you'd like to have blocked. Flash, images, iframes, what have you.</p><p>May not be as complete as AdBlock, but it's certainly useful.</p></div><p>Fixed</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No but...Right click , choose " Block content " , then select elements on a page you 'd like to have blocked .
Flash , images , iframes , what have you.May not be as complete as AdBlock , but it 's certainly useful.Fixed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No but...Right click, choose "Block content", then select elements on a page you'd like to have blocked.
Flash, images, iframes, what have you.May not be as complete as AdBlock, but it's certainly useful.Fixed
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531038</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>Kjella</author>
	<datestamp>1261486260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But I'm guessing no HTML5 video since that is pretty much stranded on the codec issue. That's the one thing I'd like to get rid of flash...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But I 'm guessing no HTML5 video since that is pretty much stranded on the codec issue .
That 's the one thing I 'd like to get rid of flash.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I'm guessing no HTML5 video since that is pretty much stranded on the codec issue.
That's the one thing I'd like to get rid of flash...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30536298</id>
	<title>Re:FAIL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259776320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Taken from http://labs.opera.com/news/2009/12/22/</p><p>Some specific known issues:</p><p>High memory usage<br>** No JIT (slow performance) on old processors without SSE2 **<br>No printing for Mac build</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Taken from http : //labs.opera.com/news/2009/12/22/Some specific known issues : High memory usage * * No JIT ( slow performance ) on old processors without SSE2 * * No printing for Mac build</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Taken from http://labs.opera.com/news/2009/12/22/Some specific known issues:High memory usage** No JIT (slow performance) on old processors without SSE2 **No printing for Mac build</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533468</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>richlv</author>
	<datestamp>1259745180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>definitely. it's "packaged" vs "stick these pieces together yourself".</p><p>as a linux user i'm quite used to putting things together myself (using slackware for many years). on the other hand, if we are talking about a single software package, i prefer it to come with all the functionality.<br>i don't have to rely on dozens of separate developers (many firefox plugins have single dev only) to keep on releasing new, compatible versions in an orchestrated manner - which almost never works that way.</p><p>looking at the ff plugins you mentioned :</p><p>abp : i've blocked most annoying ad sources in opera manually (it's damn easy to do), and i don't see the annoying ads. i do not block plaintext ads, unless i'm on a very slow gprs link, where any single connection takes several seconds, even if it's retrieving a couple of bytes. while having the list maintained for me might be easier, i'm fine by current approach. at least i don't have plugin developers try to sneak their own ads through...</p><p>forecastfox : i'm using kweather. i prefer keeping generic functionality out of single app, which is also why i'm not using any opera widgets.</p><p>noscript : while this is not as optimal in opera, there has been ability to quickly switch global js/plugin (including flash) and java status, as well as override it on a per site basis. noscript has this better, but current status in opera satisfies my needs.</p><p>imacros : that might be useful. opera has some functionality like that, but i never got to trying it out.</p><p>download stuff : i either use opera download manager, which is one of the best in browsers, or wget for longer downloads on servers.</p><p>febe : probably what opera link is (?). not using that.</p><p>now, what i'm getting to - it's all included. i don't have to search for these plugins to get this functionality (you didn't mention mouse gestures and probably a shitload of other functionality - i'm not browsing w/o mouse gestures anymore).<br>it's all available right there, with a single download.</p><p>now, hunting down and installing plugins once might not be that bad. the problem is with \_updating\_.</p><p>i've been using thunderbird since version... 0.2 or 0.3. it crashed badly and ate my mails at least once (i had a backup). but it has improved a lot in that regard, and i still use it. but i use version 2. why ? i downloaded and run version 3. it said that it is incompatible with 4 of the plugins i use - out of 4. great. 3 went the rm way, 2 is here for a while.</p><p>plugins are the strength and weakness of firefox. many are great, many are unique or best - if they are maintained and if they are compatible and if they work for you. if not, they count as missing features.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>definitely .
it 's " packaged " vs " stick these pieces together yourself " .as a linux user i 'm quite used to putting things together myself ( using slackware for many years ) .
on the other hand , if we are talking about a single software package , i prefer it to come with all the functionality.i do n't have to rely on dozens of separate developers ( many firefox plugins have single dev only ) to keep on releasing new , compatible versions in an orchestrated manner - which almost never works that way.looking at the ff plugins you mentioned : abp : i 've blocked most annoying ad sources in opera manually ( it 's damn easy to do ) , and i do n't see the annoying ads .
i do not block plaintext ads , unless i 'm on a very slow gprs link , where any single connection takes several seconds , even if it 's retrieving a couple of bytes .
while having the list maintained for me might be easier , i 'm fine by current approach .
at least i do n't have plugin developers try to sneak their own ads through...forecastfox : i 'm using kweather .
i prefer keeping generic functionality out of single app , which is also why i 'm not using any opera widgets.noscript : while this is not as optimal in opera , there has been ability to quickly switch global js/plugin ( including flash ) and java status , as well as override it on a per site basis .
noscript has this better , but current status in opera satisfies my needs.imacros : that might be useful .
opera has some functionality like that , but i never got to trying it out.download stuff : i either use opera download manager , which is one of the best in browsers , or wget for longer downloads on servers.febe : probably what opera link is ( ? ) .
not using that.now , what i 'm getting to - it 's all included .
i do n't have to search for these plugins to get this functionality ( you did n't mention mouse gestures and probably a shitload of other functionality - i 'm not browsing w/o mouse gestures anymore ) .it 's all available right there , with a single download.now , hunting down and installing plugins once might not be that bad .
the problem is with \ _updating \ _.i 've been using thunderbird since version... 0.2 or 0.3. it crashed badly and ate my mails at least once ( i had a backup ) .
but it has improved a lot in that regard , and i still use it .
but i use version 2. why ?
i downloaded and run version 3. it said that it is incompatible with 4 of the plugins i use - out of 4. great. 3 went the rm way , 2 is here for a while.plugins are the strength and weakness of firefox .
many are great , many are unique or best - if they are maintained and if they are compatible and if they work for you .
if not , they count as missing features .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>definitely.
it's "packaged" vs "stick these pieces together yourself".as a linux user i'm quite used to putting things together myself (using slackware for many years).
on the other hand, if we are talking about a single software package, i prefer it to come with all the functionality.i don't have to rely on dozens of separate developers (many firefox plugins have single dev only) to keep on releasing new, compatible versions in an orchestrated manner - which almost never works that way.looking at the ff plugins you mentioned :abp : i've blocked most annoying ad sources in opera manually (it's damn easy to do), and i don't see the annoying ads.
i do not block plaintext ads, unless i'm on a very slow gprs link, where any single connection takes several seconds, even if it's retrieving a couple of bytes.
while having the list maintained for me might be easier, i'm fine by current approach.
at least i don't have plugin developers try to sneak their own ads through...forecastfox : i'm using kweather.
i prefer keeping generic functionality out of single app, which is also why i'm not using any opera widgets.noscript : while this is not as optimal in opera, there has been ability to quickly switch global js/plugin (including flash) and java status, as well as override it on a per site basis.
noscript has this better, but current status in opera satisfies my needs.imacros : that might be useful.
opera has some functionality like that, but i never got to trying it out.download stuff : i either use opera download manager, which is one of the best in browsers, or wget for longer downloads on servers.febe : probably what opera link is (?).
not using that.now, what i'm getting to - it's all included.
i don't have to search for these plugins to get this functionality (you didn't mention mouse gestures and probably a shitload of other functionality - i'm not browsing w/o mouse gestures anymore).it's all available right there, with a single download.now, hunting down and installing plugins once might not be that bad.
the problem is with \_updating\_.i've been using thunderbird since version... 0.2 or 0.3. it crashed badly and ate my mails at least once (i had a backup).
but it has improved a lot in that regard, and i still use it.
but i use version 2. why ?
i downloaded and run version 3. it said that it is incompatible with 4 of the plugins i use - out of 4. great. 3 went the rm way, 2 is here for a while.plugins are the strength and weakness of firefox.
many are great, many are unique or best - if they are maintained and if they are compatible and if they work for you.
if not, they count as missing features.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531882</id>
	<title>Re:complete whats new and opinions</title>
	<author>jp10558</author>
	<datestamp>1261494060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I have to say, in Firefox 3.5.x, it still can't get restoring the tabs back after a crash right some noticeable amount of the time on Windows XP. I go through more of the "This is embarrassing, I can't get your tabs back" (AND WTF, because they are listed in the little list) in one week that I have in Opera since I started using it in 2001.</p><p>I honestly don't know what the problem is with FF, but it seems laughable to me. I don't even think about tab restore in Opera anymore - and haven't in years. In fact, I never close pages because they just come back when I re-open the browser. I've had the same browsing "session" for years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I have to say , in Firefox 3.5.x , it still ca n't get restoring the tabs back after a crash right some noticeable amount of the time on Windows XP .
I go through more of the " This is embarrassing , I ca n't get your tabs back " ( AND WTF , because they are listed in the little list ) in one week that I have in Opera since I started using it in 2001.I honestly do n't know what the problem is with FF , but it seems laughable to me .
I do n't even think about tab restore in Opera anymore - and have n't in years .
In fact , I never close pages because they just come back when I re-open the browser .
I 've had the same browsing " session " for years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I have to say, in Firefox 3.5.x, it still can't get restoring the tabs back after a crash right some noticeable amount of the time on Windows XP.
I go through more of the "This is embarrassing, I can't get your tabs back" (AND WTF, because they are listed in the little list) in one week that I have in Opera since I started using it in 2001.I honestly don't know what the problem is with FF, but it seems laughable to me.
I don't even think about tab restore in Opera anymore - and haven't in years.
In fact, I never close pages because they just come back when I re-open the browser.
I've had the same browsing "session" for years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533346</id>
	<title>Re:Alpha</title>
	<author>Randle\_Revar</author>
	<datestamp>1259785920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What? The FF 3.0 alphas and betas where slower than 3.0 final, same was true for FF 3.5, and expected again for FF 3.6</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
The FF 3.0 alphas and betas where slower than 3.0 final , same was true for FF 3.5 , and expected again for FF 3.6</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
The FF 3.0 alphas and betas where slower than 3.0 final, same was true for FF 3.5, and expected again for FF 3.6</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529642</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30536516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30539318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30597708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30536298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30539788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30540550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30540020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30535958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1911216_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532670
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531940
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531852
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529704
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529712
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30539318
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533904
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533332
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529852
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529790
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530592
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533952
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531018
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530166
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534230
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530090
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530368
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529646
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530168
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531056
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533024
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529978
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530332
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30539788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30540020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30597708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30536516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30536298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30535958
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530340
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532438
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531254
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30529534
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530102
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532280
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530668
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533794
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530560
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532324
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532900
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531092
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30540550
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534096
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530482
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530900
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30532234
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533468
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531882
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533276
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533736
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531718
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30533428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30530824
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1911216.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30531426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1911216.30534244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
