<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_18_1649253</id>
	<title>Microsoft Seeks Patent On Shaming Fat Gamers</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1261164720000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>theodp writes <i>"A newly disclosed Microsoft patent application &mdash; <a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=\%2Fnetahtml\%2FPTO\%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=\%2220090309891\%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20090309891&amp;RS=DN/20090309891">Avatar Individualized by Physical Characteristic</a> &mdash; takes aim at fat people, proposing to generate fat avatars in gaming environments for individuals whose health records indicate they're overweight, limiting their game play, and even banning them. From the patent application: 'An undesirable body weight could be reflected in an overweight or underweight appearance for the avatar. Only requisite health levels are allowed to compete in a certain competition level. A dedicated gamer could exercise for a period of time until his health indicator gadget shows a sufficiently high health/health credit in order to allow reentering the avatar environment.' Linking one's gaming avatar to one's physique, explains Microsoft, will produce healthy and virtuous behaviors in individuals. Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>theodp writes " A newly disclosed Microsoft patent application    Avatar Individualized by Physical Characteristic    takes aim at fat people , proposing to generate fat avatars in gaming environments for individuals whose health records indicate they 're overweight , limiting their game play , and even banning them .
From the patent application : 'An undesirable body weight could be reflected in an overweight or underweight appearance for the avatar .
Only requisite health levels are allowed to compete in a certain competition level .
A dedicated gamer could exercise for a period of time until his health indicator gadget shows a sufficiently high health/health credit in order to allow reentering the avatar environment .
' Linking one 's gaming avatar to one 's physique , explains Microsoft , will produce healthy and virtuous behaviors in individuals .
Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level , geographic location , age , sex , intelligence quotient , socioeconomic class , occupation , marital/relationship status , religious belief , political affiliation , etc .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theodp writes "A newly disclosed Microsoft patent application — Avatar Individualized by Physical Characteristic — takes aim at fat people, proposing to generate fat avatars in gaming environments for individuals whose health records indicate they're overweight, limiting their game play, and even banning them.
From the patent application: 'An undesirable body weight could be reflected in an overweight or underweight appearance for the avatar.
Only requisite health levels are allowed to compete in a certain competition level.
A dedicated gamer could exercise for a period of time until his health indicator gadget shows a sufficiently high health/health credit in order to allow reentering the avatar environment.
' Linking one's gaming avatar to one's physique, explains Microsoft, will produce healthy and virtuous behaviors in individuals.
Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492562</id>
	<title>Re:nostaliga......</title>
	<author>bertoelcon</author>
	<datestamp>1261128300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I always got bored and rigged the gun to a flashlight so you never missed. Just pull the trigger when a duck is on the screen is a hit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always got bored and rigged the gun to a flashlight so you never missed .
Just pull the trigger when a duck is on the screen is a hit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always got bored and rigged the gun to a flashlight so you never missed.
Just pull the trigger when a duck is on the screen is a hit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982</id>
	<title>Re:You think this doesn't effect you</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1261169520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If Microsoft starts actually checking players appearance and gender</p></div><p>It&rsquo;s okay... you can fool it with a picture of a vagina.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Microsoft starts actually checking players appearance and genderIt    s okay... you can fool it with a picture of a vagina .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Microsoft starts actually checking players appearance and genderIt’s okay... you can fool it with a picture of a vagina.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30511698</id>
	<title>Uh... Wii fit?</title>
	<author>Phreakiture</author>
	<datestamp>1261408860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think Wii Fit constitutes prior art -- within the context of the program, your avatar's appearance changes in response to your body weight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Wii Fit constitutes prior art -- within the context of the program , your avatar 's appearance changes in response to your body weight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Wii Fit constitutes prior art -- within the context of the program, your avatar's appearance changes in response to your body weight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492174</id>
	<title>Re:It's a Free Market</title>
	<author>Weeksauce</author>
	<datestamp>1261127040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finally! I now might be competitive in COD: MW2!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally !
I now might be competitive in COD : MW2 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally!
I now might be competitive in COD: MW2!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492676</id>
	<title>Re:And presumably all this will be done....</title>
	<author>adbge</author>
	<datestamp>1261128780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah, cause the <a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/story/09/09/22/1239254/According-to-Linus-Linux-Is-Bloated" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Linux kernel isn't bloated or anything</a> [slashdot.org], right?</p></div><p>Funny, the OP didn't mention Linux...

Cute straw-man.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , cause the Linux kernel is n't bloated or anything [ slashdot.org ] , right ? Funny , the OP did n't mention Linux.. . Cute straw-man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, cause the Linux kernel isn't bloated or anything [slashdot.org], right?Funny, the OP didn't mention Linux...

Cute straw-man.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492102</id>
	<title>Re:You think this doesn't effect you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you mean 36-24-36?  26 isn't gonna look very good or give you much room to work in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you mean 36-24-36 ?
26 is n't gon na look very good or give you much room to work in .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you mean 36-24-36?
26 isn't gonna look very good or give you much room to work in ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495338</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>Exception Duck</author>
	<datestamp>1261143600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shouldn't you be allowed to give companies access to your medical records if you choose to do so ?<br>Either for access to said product/monetary incentive/common good (medical research)</p><p>Of course they should no be able to access it without permission  -  which I'm pretty sure they do not have (depends on which country)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't you be allowed to give companies access to your medical records if you choose to do so ? Either for access to said product/monetary incentive/common good ( medical research ) Of course they should no be able to access it without permission - which I 'm pretty sure they do not have ( depends on which country )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't you be allowed to give companies access to your medical records if you choose to do so ?Either for access to said product/monetary incentive/common good (medical research)Of course they should no be able to access it without permission  -  which I'm pretty sure they do not have (depends on which country)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494618</id>
	<title>Games starring Niles &amp; Frasier Crane! I WANT!</title>
	<author>Tolkien</author>
	<datestamp>1261138080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A couple of things.
One, the patent name "Avatar Individualized by Physical Characteristic" is indeed downright insulting to more shapely people (of which I'm not one).

On the other hand, my second thought once I read this:<p><div class="quote"><p>Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc.</p></div><p>was OOH! I want to play Splinter Cell starring <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frasier" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Niles &amp; Frasier Crane</a> [wikipedia.org]!!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A couple of things .
One , the patent name " Avatar Individualized by Physical Characteristic " is indeed downright insulting to more shapely people ( of which I 'm not one ) .
On the other hand , my second thought once I read this : Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level , geographic location , age , sex , intelligence quotient , socioeconomic class , occupation , marital/relationship status , religious belief , political affiliation , etc.was OOH !
I want to play Splinter Cell starring Niles &amp; Frasier Crane [ wikipedia.org ] ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A couple of things.
One, the patent name "Avatar Individualized by Physical Characteristic" is indeed downright insulting to more shapely people (of which I'm not one).
On the other hand, my second thought once I read this:Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc.was OOH!
I want to play Splinter Cell starring Niles &amp; Frasier Crane [wikipedia.org]!!
!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492768</id>
	<title>Welcome to fascism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Welcome to fascism</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome to fascism</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome to fascism</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493388</id>
	<title>Next up, the dirty dirty cripples</title>
	<author>liquiddark</author>
	<datestamp>1261131720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One has to wonder how one differentiates an unhealthy user from an unfortunate one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One has to wonder how one differentiates an unhealthy user from an unfortunate one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One has to wonder how one differentiates an unhealthy user from an unfortunate one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491890</id>
	<title>Interesting comments so far...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems all the fat kids are denouncing this as discriminatory and all the skinny kids are making fun of the fat kids.<br> <br>Sounds about like what I'd expect.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems all the fat kids are denouncing this as discriminatory and all the skinny kids are making fun of the fat kids .
Sounds about like what I 'd expect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems all the fat kids are denouncing this as discriminatory and all the skinny kids are making fun of the fat kids.
Sounds about like what I'd expect.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494444</id>
	<title>Athletes</title>
	<author>pubwvj</author>
	<datestamp>1261137120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So it sounds like they're going to do it on the body mass index scale. Dumb. That penalizes athletes who are in excellent physical condition. I'm 30 to 40 lbs over weight by those charts. But I'm not. I work hard physically, I farm, so I have a lot of muscle and dense bones. I have little body fat. My physical activity makes for a heavy body that puts my body mass way over for my height yet I am very healthy. Even life insurance companies have started to admit those charts are dumb. They fail to take in to account real health. Once again Microsoft is behind the times and simply wrong.</p><p>What will they patent next? Racism?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So it sounds like they 're going to do it on the body mass index scale .
Dumb. That penalizes athletes who are in excellent physical condition .
I 'm 30 to 40 lbs over weight by those charts .
But I 'm not .
I work hard physically , I farm , so I have a lot of muscle and dense bones .
I have little body fat .
My physical activity makes for a heavy body that puts my body mass way over for my height yet I am very healthy .
Even life insurance companies have started to admit those charts are dumb .
They fail to take in to account real health .
Once again Microsoft is behind the times and simply wrong.What will they patent next ?
Racism ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it sounds like they're going to do it on the body mass index scale.
Dumb. That penalizes athletes who are in excellent physical condition.
I'm 30 to 40 lbs over weight by those charts.
But I'm not.
I work hard physically, I farm, so I have a lot of muscle and dense bones.
I have little body fat.
My physical activity makes for a heavy body that puts my body mass way over for my height yet I am very healthy.
Even life insurance companies have started to admit those charts are dumb.
They fail to take in to account real health.
Once again Microsoft is behind the times and simply wrong.What will they patent next?
Racism?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493328</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1261131540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, relax.</p><p>It could just be an exercise game, like Yourself! Fitness or Dance Dance Revolution in workout mode. In which case, the game itself would know when you've been slacking, as you haven't logged in for a few days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , relax.It could just be an exercise game , like Yourself !
Fitness or Dance Dance Revolution in workout mode .
In which case , the game itself would know when you 've been slacking , as you have n't logged in for a few days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, relax.It could just be an exercise game, like Yourself!
Fitness or Dance Dance Revolution in workout mode.
In which case, the game itself would know when you've been slacking, as you haven't logged in for a few days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496334</id>
	<title>Re:It's a Free Market</title>
	<author>Eudial</author>
	<datestamp>1261154580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I read this, the first thought I had was: Who the hell would want to play this game?</p><p>If you are given the choice between:<br>1. A game that heckles you for your appearance.<br>2. A game that doesn't heckle you for your appearance.</p><p>Which game would you chose to play?</p><p>This seems like a surefire way of making sure your games don't sell all that well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I read this , the first thought I had was : Who the hell would want to play this game ? If you are given the choice between : 1 .
A game that heckles you for your appearance.2 .
A game that does n't heckle you for your appearance.Which game would you chose to play ? This seems like a surefire way of making sure your games do n't sell all that well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I read this, the first thought I had was: Who the hell would want to play this game?If you are given the choice between:1.
A game that heckles you for your appearance.2.
A game that doesn't heckle you for your appearance.Which game would you chose to play?This seems like a surefire way of making sure your games don't sell all that well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492034</id>
	<title>Worst Patent application ever</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yours sincerely annoyed,</p><p>Jeff Albertson</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yours sincerely annoyed,Jeff Albertson</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yours sincerely annoyed,Jeff Albertson</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495246</id>
	<title>April 1st come early</title>
	<author>peterofoz</author>
	<datestamp>1261142820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You've got to be kidding. So why stop with heath? Let's include sexual preferences and orientation, religious and social affiliations, and stereotypes based on where you live.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've got to be kidding .
So why stop with heath ?
Let 's include sexual preferences and orientation , religious and social affiliations , and stereotypes based on where you live .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've got to be kidding.
So why stop with heath?
Let's include sexual preferences and orientation, religious and social affiliations, and stereotypes based on where you live.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492596</id>
	<title>Re:You think this doesn't effect you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>24-26? you like your women to look like a guy with a boob job?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>24-26 ?
you like your women to look like a guy with a boob job ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>24-26?
you like your women to look like a guy with a boob job?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492206</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm just going to leave this here...</p><p><a href="http://www.healthvault.com/" title="healthvault.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.healthvault.com/</a> [healthvault.com]</p><p>This is by Microsoft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm just going to leave this here...http : //www.healthvault.com/ [ healthvault.com ] This is by Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm just going to leave this here...http://www.healthvault.com/ [healthvault.com]This is by Microsoft.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493316</id>
	<title>Re:It's a Free Market</title>
	<author>SanityInAnarchy</author>
	<datestamp>1261131480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I doubt very much there's any intelligent pro-Sony, pro-OSS person.</p><p>Yes, the PS2 had Linux. It cost $200, and included a hard drive. There was no other legal way to do it. But hey, at least it had full access to the hardware.</p><p>The PS3 also has Linux, but this time, they've crippled it by running it in a hypervisor -- that is, a virtual machine.</p><p>Linux people also tend to be anti-DRM. Sony has, among other things, created DVDs which couldn't be played in most computers (or many Sony DVD players) by deliberately breaking the spec in a way they assumed would apply only to PCs, and released music CDs with a Windows rootkit installed on autoplay which makes your computer measurably less secure and slower, all in order to prevent you from "unauthorized" use, which apparently includes ripping.</p><p>I mean, I'm sure there are some people who are simultaneously Linux fanboys and Sony fanboys, but it's a position that doesn't make much sense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt very much there 's any intelligent pro-Sony , pro-OSS person.Yes , the PS2 had Linux .
It cost $ 200 , and included a hard drive .
There was no other legal way to do it .
But hey , at least it had full access to the hardware.The PS3 also has Linux , but this time , they 've crippled it by running it in a hypervisor -- that is , a virtual machine.Linux people also tend to be anti-DRM .
Sony has , among other things , created DVDs which could n't be played in most computers ( or many Sony DVD players ) by deliberately breaking the spec in a way they assumed would apply only to PCs , and released music CDs with a Windows rootkit installed on autoplay which makes your computer measurably less secure and slower , all in order to prevent you from " unauthorized " use , which apparently includes ripping.I mean , I 'm sure there are some people who are simultaneously Linux fanboys and Sony fanboys , but it 's a position that does n't make much sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt very much there's any intelligent pro-Sony, pro-OSS person.Yes, the PS2 had Linux.
It cost $200, and included a hard drive.
There was no other legal way to do it.
But hey, at least it had full access to the hardware.The PS3 also has Linux, but this time, they've crippled it by running it in a hypervisor -- that is, a virtual machine.Linux people also tend to be anti-DRM.
Sony has, among other things, created DVDs which couldn't be played in most computers (or many Sony DVD players) by deliberately breaking the spec in a way they assumed would apply only to PCs, and released music CDs with a Windows rootkit installed on autoplay which makes your computer measurably less secure and slower, all in order to prevent you from "unauthorized" use, which apparently includes ripping.I mean, I'm sure there are some people who are simultaneously Linux fanboys and Sony fanboys, but it's a position that doesn't make much sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492672</id>
	<title>i have an ideea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok now I have an ideea for a game that'll make millions. Summo online the MMO. The more you eat the higher your power level.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok now I have an ideea for a game that 'll make millions .
Summo online the MMO .
The more you eat the higher your power level .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok now I have an ideea for a game that'll make millions.
Summo online the MMO.
The more you eat the higher your power level.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491678</id>
	<title>Cool, the corporate nanny state.</title>
	<author>johnny cashed</author>
	<datestamp>1261168560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Big government wasn't enough, now the corporations step in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Big government was n't enough , now the corporations step in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Big government wasn't enough, now the corporations step in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493134</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>DrXym</author>
	<datestamp>1261130640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What about Kurdish fat people?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about Kurdish fat people ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about Kurdish fat people?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494852</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>kramerd</author>
	<datestamp>1261139700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> and i have never yet seen any other country nearby, leave aside any european countries in which overweight people were ridiculed, belittled, bullied or discriminated against in any respect.</p><p>i very much have the idea that you people are so obsessed with your own socioeconomical circumstances, and so many bullshit propaganda being fed into you that you fail to see a world outside yours with different ideas and inclinations exist.</p></div><p>So you have been outside of turkey then?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and i have never yet seen any other country nearby , leave aside any european countries in which overweight people were ridiculed , belittled , bullied or discriminated against in any respect.i very much have the idea that you people are so obsessed with your own socioeconomical circumstances , and so many bullshit propaganda being fed into you that you fail to see a world outside yours with different ideas and inclinations exist.So you have been outside of turkey then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> and i have never yet seen any other country nearby, leave aside any european countries in which overweight people were ridiculed, belittled, bullied or discriminated against in any respect.i very much have the idea that you people are so obsessed with your own socioeconomical circumstances, and so many bullshit propaganda being fed into you that you fail to see a world outside yours with different ideas and inclinations exist.So you have been outside of turkey then?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30509342</id>
	<title>Lawsuits in 3... 2...</title>
	<author>anyGould</author>
	<datestamp>1261334100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd love to see what the response to disabled folks will be on this one.</p><p>My wife's cousin is confined to a wheelchair. Does that mean his avatar will be required to be in one as well?</p><p>Actually, the whole idea of "shaping" the gamer's experience by:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc.</p></div><p>is screaming "discrimination lawsuit"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd love to see what the response to disabled folks will be on this one.My wife 's cousin is confined to a wheelchair .
Does that mean his avatar will be required to be in one as well ? Actually , the whole idea of " shaping " the gamer 's experience by : psychological and demographic information such as education level , geographic location , age , sex , intelligence quotient , socioeconomic class , occupation , marital/relationship status , religious belief , political affiliation , etc.is screaming " discrimination lawsuit "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd love to see what the response to disabled folks will be on this one.My wife's cousin is confined to a wheelchair.
Does that mean his avatar will be required to be in one as well?Actually, the whole idea of "shaping" the gamer's experience by:psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc.is screaming "discrimination lawsuit"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492696</id>
	<title>Re:From TFA:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As someone who understands the difference between a Covered Entity under HIPPA and how often the Privacy rule is upheld when a complaint is filed, this seems like a whole lot of nothing for either group to ever worry about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As someone who understands the difference between a Covered Entity under HIPPA and how often the Privacy rule is upheld when a complaint is filed , this seems like a whole lot of nothing for either group to ever worry about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As someone who understands the difference between a Covered Entity under HIPPA and how often the Privacy rule is upheld when a complaint is filed, this seems like a whole lot of nothing for either group to ever worry about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830</id>
	<title>From TFA:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The physiological data can be gleaned from a third party health data collection repository"<br> <br>
As someone who worked in the healthcare industry for a number of years, this seems like a HIPAA violation lawsuit waiting to happen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The physiological data can be gleaned from a third party health data collection repository " As someone who worked in the healthcare industry for a number of years , this seems like a HIPAA violation lawsuit waiting to happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The physiological data can be gleaned from a third party health data collection repository" 
As someone who worked in the healthcare industry for a number of years, this seems like a HIPAA violation lawsuit waiting to happen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497414</id>
	<title>What about sexual orientation?</title>
	<author>alukin</author>
	<datestamp>1261218000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, may be gamers must expose also sexual orientation, religion, size of penis, and other important for computer game information.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , may be gamers must expose also sexual orientation , religion , size of penis , and other important for computer game information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, may be gamers must expose also sexual orientation, religion, size of penis, and other important for computer game information.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492616</id>
	<title>Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You do realize that government and corporations have been virtually indistinguishable, and inseparable since the beginning of human existance, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do realize that government and corporations have been virtually indistinguishable , and inseparable since the beginning of human existance , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do realize that government and corporations have been virtually indistinguishable, and inseparable since the beginning of human existance, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30499792</id>
	<title>Anyone hasnt mentioned</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261250760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...that microsoft is most likely only doing this just to avoid potential lawsuits from parents of obese children playing their xbox360s and claiming their children became fat from playing 16hrs a day on their consoles and getting diabetes from it.  Period.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...that microsoft is most likely only doing this just to avoid potential lawsuits from parents of obese children playing their xbox360s and claiming their children became fat from playing 16hrs a day on their consoles and getting diabetes from it .
Period .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that microsoft is most likely only doing this just to avoid potential lawsuits from parents of obese children playing their xbox360s and claiming their children became fat from playing 16hrs a day on their consoles and getting diabetes from it.
Period.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492054</id>
	<title>You want to patent something useful...</title>
	<author>paulsnx2</author>
	<datestamp>1261169820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have to insure that the fitness measurements of an individual actually belong to the individual.  Haven't read their patent, but I can't see how a game can reasonably do this without some sort of biometric keys.</p><p>And what are they going to do about people with medical conditions that might preclude exercise or normal weight?  Are they really going to kick people off off the game with cancer because they have no control over their water retention?</p><p>All in all, this is a remarkably dumb idea.</p><p>It might be better suited for a dating site, using some mechanism to insure that the Avatar for an individual accurately represented basic physical aspects of an individual while preserving mostly their anonymity.  Maybe use a Video camera plus some other hardware to scan the individual both to identify them upon logging in and updating their avatar to reflect any changes to their weight/height/BMI/hairline etc.?</p><p>Please consider this *publishing* of this idea, and as a result *invalidating any patent* that might build off this stupid Microsoft idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have to insure that the fitness measurements of an individual actually belong to the individual .
Have n't read their patent , but I ca n't see how a game can reasonably do this without some sort of biometric keys.And what are they going to do about people with medical conditions that might preclude exercise or normal weight ?
Are they really going to kick people off off the game with cancer because they have no control over their water retention ? All in all , this is a remarkably dumb idea.It might be better suited for a dating site , using some mechanism to insure that the Avatar for an individual accurately represented basic physical aspects of an individual while preserving mostly their anonymity .
Maybe use a Video camera plus some other hardware to scan the individual both to identify them upon logging in and updating their avatar to reflect any changes to their weight/height/BMI/hairline etc .
? Please consider this * publishing * of this idea , and as a result * invalidating any patent * that might build off this stupid Microsoft idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have to insure that the fitness measurements of an individual actually belong to the individual.
Haven't read their patent, but I can't see how a game can reasonably do this without some sort of biometric keys.And what are they going to do about people with medical conditions that might preclude exercise or normal weight?
Are they really going to kick people off off the game with cancer because they have no control over their water retention?All in all, this is a remarkably dumb idea.It might be better suited for a dating site, using some mechanism to insure that the Avatar for an individual accurately represented basic physical aspects of an individual while preserving mostly their anonymity.
Maybe use a Video camera plus some other hardware to scan the individual both to identify them upon logging in and updating their avatar to reflect any changes to their weight/height/BMI/hairline etc.
?Please consider this *publishing* of this idea, and as a result *invalidating any patent* that might build off this stupid Microsoft idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494184</id>
	<title>WTF?</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1261135800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is so patently stupid (pun intended) that it should have never even seen the light of a Slashdot day.</p><p>It will NEVER become a reality, for so many reasons(medical privacy rights would be a good place to start), so why are we even discussing this shit?</p><p>Oh, right. Because it is funny.</p><p>Please continue...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is so patently stupid ( pun intended ) that it should have never even seen the light of a Slashdot day.It will NEVER become a reality , for so many reasons ( medical privacy rights would be a good place to start ) , so why are we even discussing this shit ? Oh , right .
Because it is funny.Please continue.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is so patently stupid (pun intended) that it should have never even seen the light of a Slashdot day.It will NEVER become a reality, for so many reasons(medical privacy rights would be a good place to start), so why are we even discussing this shit?Oh, right.
Because it is funny.Please continue...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491776</id>
	<title>Oh Noes</title>
	<author>ultraexactzz</author>
	<datestamp>1261168860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, Wii makes you swing the controller and get exercise or nags you to load up wii fit and exercise. Xbox (presumably) will now force you to exercise in order to play. Does this mean that the Playstation will become the system of the obese? I'll bet some marketing company is already working on the ads...</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , Wii makes you swing the controller and get exercise or nags you to load up wii fit and exercise .
Xbox ( presumably ) will now force you to exercise in order to play .
Does this mean that the Playstation will become the system of the obese ?
I 'll bet some marketing company is already working on the ads.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, Wii makes you swing the controller and get exercise or nags you to load up wii fit and exercise.
Xbox (presumably) will now force you to exercise in order to play.
Does this mean that the Playstation will become the system of the obese?
I'll bet some marketing company is already working on the ads...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492040</id>
	<title>Are they going to grade on a sliding scale?</title>
	<author>gurps\_npc</author>
	<datestamp>1261169760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because if they don't, they may not have any players at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because if they do n't , they may not have any players at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because if they don't, they may not have any players at all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492702</id>
	<title>Re:WTF???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Windows Live and X-Box live are private, they dont have to allow access, there are ways(though dubious) they could require health records.  For instance they are using them to limit game play time so as to not be sued for people becoming obese for playing their consoles and or games.</p><p>Even though Microsoft has distributed large amounts of idiocy in the past I doubt they would really go as far as banning persons, more like limiting play time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Windows Live and X-Box live are private , they dont have to allow access , there are ways ( though dubious ) they could require health records .
For instance they are using them to limit game play time so as to not be sued for people becoming obese for playing their consoles and or games.Even though Microsoft has distributed large amounts of idiocy in the past I doubt they would really go as far as banning persons , more like limiting play time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windows Live and X-Box live are private, they dont have to allow access, there are ways(though dubious) they could require health records.
For instance they are using them to limit game play time so as to not be sued for people becoming obese for playing their consoles and or games.Even though Microsoft has distributed large amounts of idiocy in the past I doubt they would really go as far as banning persons, more like limiting play time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495038</id>
	<title>Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit</title>
	<author>iamhassi</author>
	<datestamp>1261141140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"That's obese!"</i>
<br> <br>
exactly:  doesn't the Wii Fit do this already?  <a href="http://artsyfartsytim.blogspot.com/2009\_02\_01\_archive.html" title="blogspot.com">If you're obese according to BMI it makes your avatar obese,</a> [blogspot.com] if you're underweight it makes your avatar very skinny.  Since the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wii\_Fit" title="wikipedia.org">Wii Fit came out in 2007</a> [wikipedia.org] and Microsoft didn't file until June 2008 I'd say that's enough prior air.
<br> <br>
Is Microsoft going to sue Nintendo for Wii Fit?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" That 's obese !
" exactly : does n't the Wii Fit do this already ?
If you 're obese according to BMI it makes your avatar obese , [ blogspot.com ] if you 're underweight it makes your avatar very skinny .
Since the Wii Fit came out in 2007 [ wikipedia.org ] and Microsoft did n't file until June 2008 I 'd say that 's enough prior air .
Is Microsoft going to sue Nintendo for Wii Fit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"That's obese!
"
 
exactly:  doesn't the Wii Fit do this already?
If you're obese according to BMI it makes your avatar obese, [blogspot.com] if you're underweight it makes your avatar very skinny.
Since the Wii Fit came out in 2007 [wikipedia.org] and Microsoft didn't file until June 2008 I'd say that's enough prior air.
Is Microsoft going to sue Nintendo for Wii Fit?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491680</id>
	<title>First of april?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's the date.. first of april? No.. I don't get the point of this..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the date.. first of april ?
No.. I do n't get the point of this. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the date.. first of april?
No.. I don't get the point of this..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493268</id>
	<title>Prior art</title>
	<author>bugs2squash</author>
	<datestamp>1261131300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My human form is simply the earthy representation of my plump soul in heaven and you can't prove otherwise.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My human form is simply the earthy representation of my plump soul in heaven and you ca n't prove otherwise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My human form is simply the earthy representation of my plump soul in heaven and you can't prove otherwise.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493084</id>
	<title>Re:It's a Free Market</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261130460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>if Microsoft does this, then the Playstation becomes the console for the large.</p></div><p>do you not mean for the masses...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>if Microsoft does this , then the Playstation becomes the console for the large.do you not mean for the masses.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if Microsoft does this, then the Playstation becomes the console for the large.do you not mean for the masses...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491928</id>
	<title>Right to Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First this is the kind of patent that makes our patent system worthless.  Patenting a Light Bulb = Good, Patenting a You're Fat Neener Neener Neener = Bad

Second, they have no real capability of using their patent unless they want to violate someone personal privacy.  It would be like facebook posting my weight to the world without my consent, or forbidding me from removing it when I no longer want to expose myself.  Shame only works if the user can't opt out and if the users cant opt out then it's a violation of privacy without exception.</htmltext>
<tokenext>First this is the kind of patent that makes our patent system worthless .
Patenting a Light Bulb = Good , Patenting a You 're Fat Neener Neener Neener = Bad Second , they have no real capability of using their patent unless they want to violate someone personal privacy .
It would be like facebook posting my weight to the world without my consent , or forbidding me from removing it when I no longer want to expose myself .
Shame only works if the user ca n't opt out and if the users cant opt out then it 's a violation of privacy without exception .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First this is the kind of patent that makes our patent system worthless.
Patenting a Light Bulb = Good, Patenting a You're Fat Neener Neener Neener = Bad

Second, they have no real capability of using their patent unless they want to violate someone personal privacy.
It would be like facebook posting my weight to the world without my consent, or forbidding me from removing it when I no longer want to expose myself.
Shame only works if the user can't opt out and if the users cant opt out then it's a violation of privacy without exception.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492016</id>
	<title>Probably trying to avoid frivolous lawsuits</title>
	<author>ravenscar</author>
	<datestamp>1261169640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>MSFT probably realizes that they are right behind fast food chains in being targeted for law suits claiming they are liable for making people fat.  By making such a feature available to say, parents for example, they may make themselves less susceptible to suit.

I highly doubt MSFT is just looking to shame people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>MSFT probably realizes that they are right behind fast food chains in being targeted for law suits claiming they are liable for making people fat .
By making such a feature available to say , parents for example , they may make themselves less susceptible to suit .
I highly doubt MSFT is just looking to shame people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MSFT probably realizes that they are right behind fast food chains in being targeted for law suits claiming they are liable for making people fat.
By making such a feature available to say, parents for example, they may make themselves less susceptible to suit.
I highly doubt MSFT is just looking to shame people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493608</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>quadelirus</author>
	<datestamp>1261132680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it seems much more likely that what they want to do is market a device that rewards you for getting in shape, not secretly find your medical records and not let you pay.
<br> <br>
Probably something like,
<br> <br>
"Hey parents, tired of your kids playing too many video games and getting fat? Well now you can buy this bracelet that they will have to wear or else their xbox won't work and the bracelet will only allow them to play when they are healthy."
<br> <br>
Seriously, though. Business is about money. MS isn't going to secretly tap into your medical records to keep you from playing their games. Whatever the reason is for their doing this, you can be sure it is profit motivated, and more than likely something along the lines of what I suggested, and nothing sinister at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it seems much more likely that what they want to do is market a device that rewards you for getting in shape , not secretly find your medical records and not let you pay .
Probably something like , " Hey parents , tired of your kids playing too many video games and getting fat ?
Well now you can buy this bracelet that they will have to wear or else their xbox wo n't work and the bracelet will only allow them to play when they are healthy .
" Seriously , though .
Business is about money .
MS is n't going to secretly tap into your medical records to keep you from playing their games .
Whatever the reason is for their doing this , you can be sure it is profit motivated , and more than likely something along the lines of what I suggested , and nothing sinister at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it seems much more likely that what they want to do is market a device that rewards you for getting in shape, not secretly find your medical records and not let you pay.
Probably something like,
 
"Hey parents, tired of your kids playing too many video games and getting fat?
Well now you can buy this bracelet that they will have to wear or else their xbox won't work and the bracelet will only allow them to play when they are healthy.
"
 
Seriously, though.
Business is about money.
MS isn't going to secretly tap into your medical records to keep you from playing their games.
Whatever the reason is for their doing this, you can be sure it is profit motivated, and more than likely something along the lines of what I suggested, and nothing sinister at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497468</id>
	<title>Human Rights and internet privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261218900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a blatant abuse of internet privacy, No entertainment industry should mandate such things and pry into the lives of their customers like that. It's the right of any person to play a game if they want to and if they are overweight, underweight, or ideal it should be up to them and their doctor, Not Microsoft!</p><p>Sickest thing is we would be paying money to these people for this 'service'.</p><p>In no other industry can a manufacturer screw with their customers more then in the game industry!!!</p><p>BTW, I have many gamer friends who are of many different weight classes... One friend is superskinny and another is a large (but not fat guy) how are these people going to be looked at, cause their is nothing wrong physically but they would not be able to change the fundamentals of their bodies, it's just genetics.</p><p>This is just more proof that choice is not a 21st century value.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a blatant abuse of internet privacy , No entertainment industry should mandate such things and pry into the lives of their customers like that .
It 's the right of any person to play a game if they want to and if they are overweight , underweight , or ideal it should be up to them and their doctor , Not Microsoft ! Sickest thing is we would be paying money to these people for this 'service'.In no other industry can a manufacturer screw with their customers more then in the game industry ! !
! BTW , I have many gamer friends who are of many different weight classes... One friend is superskinny and another is a large ( but not fat guy ) how are these people going to be looked at , cause their is nothing wrong physically but they would not be able to change the fundamentals of their bodies , it 's just genetics.This is just more proof that choice is not a 21st century value .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a blatant abuse of internet privacy, No entertainment industry should mandate such things and pry into the lives of their customers like that.
It's the right of any person to play a game if they want to and if they are overweight, underweight, or ideal it should be up to them and their doctor, Not Microsoft!Sickest thing is we would be paying money to these people for this 'service'.In no other industry can a manufacturer screw with their customers more then in the game industry!!
!BTW, I have many gamer friends who are of many different weight classes... One friend is superskinny and another is a large (but not fat guy) how are these people going to be looked at, cause their is nothing wrong physically but they would not be able to change the fundamentals of their bodies, it's just genetics.This is just more proof that choice is not a 21st century value.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492814</id>
	<title>Re:WTF???</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1261129320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, you don&rsquo;t understand. They expect you to enter it into the registration form.</p><p>But I am happy that you did not even consider this possibility, because it was just way out of the imaginable, and therefore did not understand.<br>That shows a healthy, unmarred brain.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , you don    t understand .
They expect you to enter it into the registration form.But I am happy that you did not even consider this possibility , because it was just way out of the imaginable , and therefore did not understand.That shows a healthy , unmarred brain .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, you don’t understand.
They expect you to enter it into the registration form.But I am happy that you did not even consider this possibility, because it was just way out of the imaginable, and therefore did not understand.That shows a healthy, unmarred brain.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494482</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261137300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They aren't going to have access to your medical records genius.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are n't going to have access to your medical records genius .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They aren't going to have access to your medical records genius.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495376</id>
	<title>disgusting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261143960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just think this is fucking disgusting... Game world and real world should be entirely different entities...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just think this is fucking disgusting... Game world and real world should be entirely different entities.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just think this is fucking disgusting... Game world and real world should be entirely different entities...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495270</id>
	<title>But...</title>
	<author>someone1234</author>
	<datestamp>1261143000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But Ballmer is damn fat as well. Why stop at games? They should deny access to all services for fat people, starting with HIM.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But Ballmer is damn fat as well .
Why stop at games ?
They should deny access to all services for fat people , starting with HIM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But Ballmer is damn fat as well.
Why stop at games?
They should deny access to all services for fat people, starting with HIM.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30504142</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1261327380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1483516&amp;cid=30504072" title="slashdot.org">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1483516&amp;cid=30504072</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1483516&amp;cid = 30504072 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1483516&amp;cid=30504072 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493010</id>
	<title>Re:And presumably all this will be done....</title>
	<author>Synchis</author>
	<datestamp>1261130100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love how you managed to quote a single<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. article about a single persons opinion (albiet an influencial opinion) about the Linux Kernel and have used it as evidence in a sarcastic reply to an even more sarcastic post.</p><p>Windows *is* bloated. I believe the Windows 7 footprint when I installed it was in the range of 2-3gig, and that was *just* the OS.</p><p>Ubuntu footprint from my latest install on a laptop: 2gig, and that was *WITH* all sorts of games, apps, web browser, etc all installed with it.</p><p>If you stripped Linux down to what M$ gives you out of the box, the footprint would be significantly smaller.</p><p>Oh, and I'm pretty sure you couldn't get Windows 7 to fit on a <a href="http://www.linuxlinks.com/Distributions/Floppy/" title="linuxlinks.com">1.44" floppy</a> [linuxlinks.com] and still have it boot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I love how you managed to quote a single / .
article about a single persons opinion ( albiet an influencial opinion ) about the Linux Kernel and have used it as evidence in a sarcastic reply to an even more sarcastic post.Windows * is * bloated .
I believe the Windows 7 footprint when I installed it was in the range of 2-3gig , and that was * just * the OS.Ubuntu footprint from my latest install on a laptop : 2gig , and that was * WITH * all sorts of games , apps , web browser , etc all installed with it.If you stripped Linux down to what M $ gives you out of the box , the footprint would be significantly smaller.Oh , and I 'm pretty sure you could n't get Windows 7 to fit on a 1.44 " floppy [ linuxlinks.com ] and still have it boot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love how you managed to quote a single /.
article about a single persons opinion (albiet an influencial opinion) about the Linux Kernel and have used it as evidence in a sarcastic reply to an even more sarcastic post.Windows *is* bloated.
I believe the Windows 7 footprint when I installed it was in the range of 2-3gig, and that was *just* the OS.Ubuntu footprint from my latest install on a laptop: 2gig, and that was *WITH* all sorts of games, apps, web browser, etc all installed with it.If you stripped Linux down to what M$ gives you out of the box, the footprint would be significantly smaller.Oh, and I'm pretty sure you couldn't get Windows 7 to fit on a 1.44" floppy [linuxlinks.com] and still have it boot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495870</id>
	<title>Re:And presumably all this will be done....</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1261149180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good call. We also need OS-based discrimination. For example the economy could work like this:<br>
<br>
If you run the game on Windows, all items in the game will be twice as expensive and you will have access to exclusive antivirus items that keep your other items from randomly breaking (while lowering all your stats).<br>
If you run it on Linux, you won't be able to use the in-game currency at all.<br>
If you run it on Mac OS you can't buy anything but the most expensive item of every kind.<br>
If you run it on an iPhone, everytime you try to put something on the market, it will take three months to be processed and may or may not be rejected.<br>
<br>
Brillant!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good call .
We also need OS-based discrimination .
For example the economy could work like this : If you run the game on Windows , all items in the game will be twice as expensive and you will have access to exclusive antivirus items that keep your other items from randomly breaking ( while lowering all your stats ) .
If you run it on Linux , you wo n't be able to use the in-game currency at all .
If you run it on Mac OS you ca n't buy anything but the most expensive item of every kind .
If you run it on an iPhone , everytime you try to put something on the market , it will take three months to be processed and may or may not be rejected .
Brillant !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good call.
We also need OS-based discrimination.
For example the economy could work like this:

If you run the game on Windows, all items in the game will be twice as expensive and you will have access to exclusive antivirus items that keep your other items from randomly breaking (while lowering all your stats).
If you run it on Linux, you won't be able to use the in-game currency at all.
If you run it on Mac OS you can't buy anything but the most expensive item of every kind.
If you run it on an iPhone, everytime you try to put something on the market, it will take three months to be processed and may or may not be rejected.
Brillant!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494382</id>
	<title>Just a other way to get on the pre existing condit</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1261136820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just a other way to get on the pre existing condition list.</p><p>This is the same M$ that used to hire temps as full time to get out of paying for there health care.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a other way to get on the pre existing condition list.This is the same M $ that used to hire temps as full time to get out of paying for there health care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a other way to get on the pre existing condition list.This is the same M$ that used to hire temps as full time to get out of paying for there health care.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491882</id>
	<title>Exercise stimulates endorphins</title>
	<author>Akido37</author>
	<datestamp>1261169220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>So I want to play games, so I have to exercise.  Exercise releases chemicals causing pleasure in my brain.
<br> <br>
Eventually, I enjoy the exercise more than video games.  I stop buying new games, and EA/Microsoft/Sony/Nintendo go out of business, and thousands of people lose their jobs.<br> <br>

Thanks a LOT, Microsoft!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So I want to play games , so I have to exercise .
Exercise releases chemicals causing pleasure in my brain .
Eventually , I enjoy the exercise more than video games .
I stop buying new games , and EA/Microsoft/Sony/Nintendo go out of business , and thousands of people lose their jobs .
Thanks a LOT , Microsoft !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I want to play games, so I have to exercise.
Exercise releases chemicals causing pleasure in my brain.
Eventually, I enjoy the exercise more than video games.
I stop buying new games, and EA/Microsoft/Sony/Nintendo go out of business, and thousands of people lose their jobs.
Thanks a LOT, Microsoft!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492916</id>
	<title>Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor</title>
	<author>Z1NG</author>
	<datestamp>1261129800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe the guy has a good sense of humor about it.  Think of how famous the Star Wars kid could have been.  Probably not very, but he might have gotten some good interviews and an extra 15 minutes.  Sometimes the only difference between having people laugh with you and at you is whether or not you decide to join in.
Having said that, I'm not sure why you got modded flamebait, you have a valid point, maybe it was the anonymouscoward part.  Personally, I wish I knew that guy.  What a bad ass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the guy has a good sense of humor about it .
Think of how famous the Star Wars kid could have been .
Probably not very , but he might have gotten some good interviews and an extra 15 minutes .
Sometimes the only difference between having people laugh with you and at you is whether or not you decide to join in .
Having said that , I 'm not sure why you got modded flamebait , you have a valid point , maybe it was the anonymouscoward part .
Personally , I wish I knew that guy .
What a bad ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the guy has a good sense of humor about it.
Think of how famous the Star Wars kid could have been.
Probably not very, but he might have gotten some good interviews and an extra 15 minutes.
Sometimes the only difference between having people laugh with you and at you is whether or not you decide to join in.
Having said that, I'm not sure why you got modded flamebait, you have a valid point, maybe it was the anonymouscoward part.
Personally, I wish I knew that guy.
What a bad ass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492250</id>
	<title>Fuck that</title>
	<author>greymond</author>
	<datestamp>1261127280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they start with this, then whats next? If you're a smoker you can't play wii tennis?</p><p>Besides, they'd lose too much money if fat people couldn't play video games anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they start with this , then whats next ?
If you 're a smoker you ca n't play wii tennis ? Besides , they 'd lose too much money if fat people could n't play video games anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they start with this, then whats next?
If you're a smoker you can't play wii tennis?Besides, they'd lose too much money if fat people couldn't play video games anymore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494244</id>
	<title>hilarious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261136100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i just love how many people cant see this is a joke. Keep whining about something that isnt real<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i just love how many people cant see this is a joke .
Keep whining about something that isnt real : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i just love how many people cant see this is a joke.
Keep whining about something that isnt real :D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494606</id>
	<title>What about transgendered avatars?</title>
	<author>Velex</author>
	<datestamp>1261138080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is irritating.  I certainly won't be playing any games that implement this.  I'm forced to be male despite being a woman IRL, and they want me to pay for the privelege in-game?!  They'd at least better have shemale avatars.  I pay good money for my meds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is irritating .
I certainly wo n't be playing any games that implement this .
I 'm forced to be male despite being a woman IRL , and they want me to pay for the privelege in-game ? !
They 'd at least better have shemale avatars .
I pay good money for my meds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is irritating.
I certainly won't be playing any games that implement this.
I'm forced to be male despite being a woman IRL, and they want me to pay for the privelege in-game?!
They'd at least better have shemale avatars.
I pay good money for my meds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491948</id>
	<title>Re:You think this doesn't effect you</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1261169400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But that's my favourite past time!</p><p>ASL?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;) 18/f/So-Cal!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But that 's my favourite past time ! ASL ?
; ) 18/f/So-Cal !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But that's my favourite past time!ASL?
;) 18/f/So-Cal!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496590</id>
	<title>Re:You want to patent something useful...</title>
	<author>Anonymous Hermit</author>
	<datestamp>1261158540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the idea is to offer a service that allows you to make gaming a reward for physical activity, and to create groups dedicated to losing their "undesirable body weight". A bit like if someone pedaled a bike to charge the battery for a console.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the idea is to offer a service that allows you to make gaming a reward for physical activity , and to create groups dedicated to losing their " undesirable body weight " .
A bit like if someone pedaled a bike to charge the battery for a console .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the idea is to offer a service that allows you to make gaming a reward for physical activity, and to create groups dedicated to losing their "undesirable body weight".
A bit like if someone pedaled a bike to charge the battery for a console.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491666</id>
	<title>Like wii fit?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like already happens with the avatars in wii fit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like already happens with the avatars in wii fit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like already happens with the avatars in wii fit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492092</id>
	<title>Re:Brilliant</title>
	<author>porkThreeWays</author>
	<datestamp>1261169940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think a lot of kids are outsiders because of video games, I think a lot of outsiders turn to video games for comfort and to get away from the world. If you shame them in their one place to escape, they'll turn to another place to escape such as reading sci-fi.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think a lot of kids are outsiders because of video games , I think a lot of outsiders turn to video games for comfort and to get away from the world .
If you shame them in their one place to escape , they 'll turn to another place to escape such as reading sci-fi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think a lot of kids are outsiders because of video games, I think a lot of outsiders turn to video games for comfort and to get away from the world.
If you shame them in their one place to escape, they'll turn to another place to escape such as reading sci-fi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493318</id>
	<title>This is Microsoft Covering Their Ass</title>
	<author>stupidcomputers</author>
	<datestamp>1261131480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is Microsoft Covering Their Ass - this patent combined with project NATAL is about making sure Fatty Mcfatterson doesn't have a heart attack while punching the monkey.  They will gracefully make the game easier so it doesn't stress out the player.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is Microsoft Covering Their Ass - this patent combined with project NATAL is about making sure Fatty Mcfatterson does n't have a heart attack while punching the monkey .
They will gracefully make the game easier so it does n't stress out the player .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is Microsoft Covering Their Ass - this patent combined with project NATAL is about making sure Fatty Mcfatterson doesn't have a heart attack while punching the monkey.
They will gracefully make the game easier so it doesn't stress out the player.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493624</id>
	<title>Re:nostaliga......</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1261132800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet yours is shaped in the form of a bong isn't it? Admit it fokker, you're on the pot!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet yours is shaped in the form of a bong is n't it ?
Admit it fokker , you 're on the pot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet yours is shaped in the form of a bong isn't it?
Admit it fokker, you're on the pot!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492046</id>
	<title>Not a totally bad idea</title>
	<author>pclminion</author>
	<datestamp>1261169760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Come on people, are you dense? The idea is to create a game where success in the game is linked to personal health improvement in real life. If you don't like that sort of concept, don't play that particular game. I have no idea where you get the idea that this would be applied to all online environments.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on people , are you dense ?
The idea is to create a game where success in the game is linked to personal health improvement in real life .
If you do n't like that sort of concept , do n't play that particular game .
I have no idea where you get the idea that this would be applied to all online environments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on people, are you dense?
The idea is to create a game where success in the game is linked to personal health improvement in real life.
If you don't like that sort of concept, don't play that particular game.
I have no idea where you get the idea that this would be applied to all online environments.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492376</id>
	<title>Re:It's a Free Market</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>PS3 already is, didn't you see the commercial:</p><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7PhJp3ciRQ</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>PS3 already is , did n't you see the commercial : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = x7PhJp3ciRQ</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PS3 already is, didn't you see the commercial:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7PhJp3ciRQ</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491676</id>
	<title>nostaliga......</title>
	<author>Shakrai</author>
	<datestamp>1261168560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, the NES zapper.  That thing was awesome.  Is it sad that I can still burn an entire afternoon playing duck hunt when the mood strikes?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , the NES zapper .
That thing was awesome .
Is it sad that I can still burn an entire afternoon playing duck hunt when the mood strikes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, the NES zapper.
That thing was awesome.
Is it sad that I can still burn an entire afternoon playing duck hunt when the mood strikes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494454</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>kdemetter</author>
	<datestamp>1261137120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Only requisite health levels are allowed to compete in a certain competition level"</p><p>Something tells me the average hard core gamer doesn't have the required health level.</p><p>So basically they are telling potential customers ( gamers ) , to do less of what they like ( to play games ) , to do more of what they dislike ( work out , etc ) .</p><p>If gamers would actually follow this  , the end result is that they will play less games ( since they need time to stay in shape ) . So that means , less need to buy new games -&gt;  less sales  -&gt; less profit for the game companies .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Only requisite health levels are allowed to compete in a certain competition level " Something tells me the average hard core gamer does n't have the required health level.So basically they are telling potential customers ( gamers ) , to do less of what they like ( to play games ) , to do more of what they dislike ( work out , etc ) .If gamers would actually follow this , the end result is that they will play less games ( since they need time to stay in shape ) .
So that means , less need to buy new games - &gt; less sales - &gt; less profit for the game companies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Only requisite health levels are allowed to compete in a certain competition level"Something tells me the average hard core gamer doesn't have the required health level.So basically they are telling potential customers ( gamers ) , to do less of what they like ( to play games ) , to do more of what they dislike ( work out , etc ) .If gamers would actually follow this  , the end result is that they will play less games ( since they need time to stay in shape ) .
So that means , less need to buy new games -&gt;  less sales  -&gt; less profit for the game companies .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30513156</id>
	<title>Taco Unmasked!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261416360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that Cmdr Taco in the blue Jedi get-up?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that Cmdr Taco in the blue Jedi get-up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that Cmdr Taco in the blue Jedi get-up?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494784</id>
	<title>Nah</title>
	<author>BigSlowTarget</author>
	<datestamp>1261139160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All your HIPAA rights are waived in the TOS.  Did you click 'I agree'?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All your HIPAA rights are waived in the TOS .
Did you click 'I agree ' ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All your HIPAA rights are waived in the TOS.
Did you click 'I agree'?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494276</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>altan</author>
	<datestamp>1261136340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Though we may not discriminate against the fat quite yet, we're quite accomplished in the craft - ask the Kurds!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Though we may not discriminate against the fat quite yet , we 're quite accomplished in the craft - ask the Kurds !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Though we may not discriminate against the fat quite yet, we're quite accomplished in the craft - ask the Kurds!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492122</id>
	<title>Discrimination</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261126860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not only for the workplace anymore!
Now standard on all MS games.

If Microsoft seriously gets this 'patent' approved for the US gaming market.... how will it actually hold up against the constitution? If it's illegal to discriminate against people for the above reasons (sex, socioeconomic class, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc) for things like a job, a loan, housing; then what makes it alright for MS to use those for 'shaping gaming experiences' ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only for the workplace anymore !
Now standard on all MS games .
If Microsoft seriously gets this 'patent ' approved for the US gaming market.... how will it actually hold up against the constitution ?
If it 's illegal to discriminate against people for the above reasons ( sex , socioeconomic class , marital/relationship status , religious belief , political affiliation , etc ) for things like a job , a loan , housing ; then what makes it alright for MS to use those for 'shaping gaming experiences ' ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only for the workplace anymore!
Now standard on all MS games.
If Microsoft seriously gets this 'patent' approved for the US gaming market.... how will it actually hold up against the constitution?
If it's illegal to discriminate against people for the above reasons (sex, socioeconomic class, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc) for things like a job, a loan, housing; then what makes it alright for MS to use those for 'shaping gaming experiences' ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492592</id>
	<title>I'm applying for a patent</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm applying for a patent on making stupid business decisions.  The main effect of this patent is to keep Microsoft from doing stuff like this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm applying for a patent on making stupid business decisions .
The main effect of this patent is to keep Microsoft from doing stuff like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm applying for a patent on making stupid business decisions.
The main effect of this patent is to keep Microsoft from doing stuff like this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494770</id>
	<title>epic fail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261139100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a feeling this is one of those patents meant to obstruct/charge licensing on predicted development. This along with other Microsoft decisions highlites a growing and disturbing trend in the IT industry as a whole ie Google.<br>Linux isn't the inherent answer either as folks like ubuntu are all too eager to follow suit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a feeling this is one of those patents meant to obstruct/charge licensing on predicted development .
This along with other Microsoft decisions highlites a growing and disturbing trend in the IT industry as a whole ie Google.Linux is n't the inherent answer either as folks like ubuntu are all too eager to follow suit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a feeling this is one of those patents meant to obstruct/charge licensing on predicted development.
This along with other Microsoft decisions highlites a growing and disturbing trend in the IT industry as a whole ie Google.Linux isn't the inherent answer either as folks like ubuntu are all too eager to follow suit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30501252</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>Gaffod</author>
	<datestamp>1261227600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also from Turkey. Nobody likes fat chicks here either, guys who are like 200 kg might get made fun of by immature people. Isn't that the extent of the "discrimination" in US? Skinny people don't find fat people visually appealing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also from Turkey .
Nobody likes fat chicks here either , guys who are like 200 kg might get made fun of by immature people .
Is n't that the extent of the " discrimination " in US ?
Skinny people do n't find fat people visually appealing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also from Turkey.
Nobody likes fat chicks here either, guys who are like 200 kg might get made fun of by immature people.
Isn't that the extent of the "discrimination" in US?
Skinny people don't find fat people visually appealing?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492468</id>
	<title>What about disibilities?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the most touching things I ever had on Xbox Live was when I received a message I from a friend who always seemed to be on, but not in the previous 2 weeks.  The message was from his mother thanking me, and everyone on his friends list for being his friend and telling us he had passed away.  She continued to tell us he had Downs Syndrome, and at 21 years of age had passed away from complications of it.  She told us that we, his virtual friends were the only friends he really seemed to have, because we didn't know about, or judge him because of his condition.</p><p>Would this system have deprived him of the one joy he had in his life because he couldn't run the hundred meter dash, or didn't match up with some other physical standard?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the most touching things I ever had on Xbox Live was when I received a message I from a friend who always seemed to be on , but not in the previous 2 weeks .
The message was from his mother thanking me , and everyone on his friends list for being his friend and telling us he had passed away .
She continued to tell us he had Downs Syndrome , and at 21 years of age had passed away from complications of it .
She told us that we , his virtual friends were the only friends he really seemed to have , because we did n't know about , or judge him because of his condition.Would this system have deprived him of the one joy he had in his life because he could n't run the hundred meter dash , or did n't match up with some other physical standard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the most touching things I ever had on Xbox Live was when I received a message I from a friend who always seemed to be on, but not in the previous 2 weeks.
The message was from his mother thanking me, and everyone on his friends list for being his friend and telling us he had passed away.
She continued to tell us he had Downs Syndrome, and at 21 years of age had passed away from complications of it.
She told us that we, his virtual friends were the only friends he really seemed to have, because we didn't know about, or judge him because of his condition.Would this system have deprived him of the one joy he had in his life because he couldn't run the hundred meter dash, or didn't match up with some other physical standard?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497516</id>
	<title>Microsoft's FAT patent fetish</title>
	<author>anonum</author>
	<datestamp>1261219920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe the folk at Microsoft feel that they're not getting enough licensing revenue of their existing FAT patents...<br><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/iplicensing/productDetail.aspx?productTitle=FAT\%20File\%20System" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/iplicensing/productDetail.aspx?productTitle=FAT\%20File\%20System</a> [microsoft.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the folk at Microsoft feel that they 're not getting enough licensing revenue of their existing FAT patents...http : //www.microsoft.com/iplicensing/productDetail.aspx ? productTitle = FAT \ % 20File \ % 20System [ microsoft.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the folk at Microsoft feel that they're not getting enough licensing revenue of their existing FAT patents...http://www.microsoft.com/iplicensing/productDetail.aspx?productTitle=FAT\%20File\%20System [microsoft.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30499838</id>
	<title>People who live in glass houses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261251120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fat people...the last great frontier of discrimination.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fat people...the last great frontier of discrimination .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fat people...the last great frontier of discrimination.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493460</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1261131960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>you and your obsessions. fat people are not discriminated against or humiliated in any way in my country. the country is turkey.</i></p><p>I guess the Turkish obsession is insulting entire nations on messageboards, eh?</p><p><i>and i have never yet seen any other country nearby, leave aside any european countries in which overweight people were ridiculed, belittled, bullied or discriminated against in any respect.</i></p><p>They aren't in the US, either. So... what's your point?</p><p><i>i very much have the idea that you people are so obsessed with your own socioeconomical circumstances,</i></p><p>And "you people" are not? People in Turkey say, "I'm so happy I'm poor and unloved! I'd never obsess over this!"</p><p>Maybe you should travel outside Turkey and find out how much like you everybody else is. Hint: A fucking LOT.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you and your obsessions .
fat people are not discriminated against or humiliated in any way in my country .
the country is turkey.I guess the Turkish obsession is insulting entire nations on messageboards , eh ? and i have never yet seen any other country nearby , leave aside any european countries in which overweight people were ridiculed , belittled , bullied or discriminated against in any respect.They are n't in the US , either .
So... what 's your point ? i very much have the idea that you people are so obsessed with your own socioeconomical circumstances,And " you people " are not ?
People in Turkey say , " I 'm so happy I 'm poor and unloved !
I 'd never obsess over this !
" Maybe you should travel outside Turkey and find out how much like you everybody else is .
Hint : A fucking LOT .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you and your obsessions.
fat people are not discriminated against or humiliated in any way in my country.
the country is turkey.I guess the Turkish obsession is insulting entire nations on messageboards, eh?and i have never yet seen any other country nearby, leave aside any european countries in which overweight people were ridiculed, belittled, bullied or discriminated against in any respect.They aren't in the US, either.
So... what's your point?i very much have the idea that you people are so obsessed with your own socioeconomical circumstances,And "you people" are not?
People in Turkey say, "I'm so happy I'm poor and unloved!
I'd never obsess over this!
"Maybe you should travel outside Turkey and find out how much like you everybody else is.
Hint: A fucking LOT.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495252</id>
	<title>Re:*cough* HIPAA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261142880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're signing a disclosure, then you need to get your Rx willed somewhere else.  I have NEVER been to a pharmacy that had me sign anything but the credit card slip.  Also, report any hipaa violations, and the company can be hit with a $250,000 (i think that's what the numbers were the last time i went through corporate compliance at my hospital/employer) fine PER VIOLATION.  Not to mention that the employee or employees that caused the violation also get fined something like $5,000 per violation.</p><p>In fact, we have to get your permission to send your results to your doctor who ordered your tests/scans.  And we have to ask if you want it sent to anyone else.  If you say no, we can't send it anywhere.</p><p>Looks like you're getting dicked over by your healthcare provider and need to report the violations to hipaa.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're signing a disclosure , then you need to get your Rx willed somewhere else .
I have NEVER been to a pharmacy that had me sign anything but the credit card slip .
Also , report any hipaa violations , and the company can be hit with a $ 250,000 ( i think that 's what the numbers were the last time i went through corporate compliance at my hospital/employer ) fine PER VIOLATION .
Not to mention that the employee or employees that caused the violation also get fined something like $ 5,000 per violation.In fact , we have to get your permission to send your results to your doctor who ordered your tests/scans .
And we have to ask if you want it sent to anyone else .
If you say no , we ca n't send it anywhere.Looks like you 're getting dicked over by your healthcare provider and need to report the violations to hipaa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're signing a disclosure, then you need to get your Rx willed somewhere else.
I have NEVER been to a pharmacy that had me sign anything but the credit card slip.
Also, report any hipaa violations, and the company can be hit with a $250,000 (i think that's what the numbers were the last time i went through corporate compliance at my hospital/employer) fine PER VIOLATION.
Not to mention that the employee or employees that caused the violation also get fined something like $5,000 per violation.In fact, we have to get your permission to send your results to your doctor who ordered your tests/scans.
And we have to ask if you want it sent to anyone else.
If you say no, we can't send it anywhere.Looks like you're getting dicked over by your healthcare provider and need to report the violations to hipaa.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492874</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493154</id>
	<title>Re:Discrimination</title>
	<author>Synchis</author>
	<datestamp>1261130760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't *HAVE* to buy the game...</p><p>I think the sentiment here is that if M$ brings this sort of technology on the market, they will likely "innovate" themselves right out of the market.</p><p>Not only does this act to descriminate against users, it also singles them out and takes away one of the reasons people play these games to begin with (to escape reality). There are also heaps of privacy concerns in this, as it would almost certainly require user consent to glean data from medical records.</p><p>I can't see this actually coming to fruition and making them any kind of money.</p><p>Nintendo's approach was much better. Introduce the tools that people can use to get fit (physically and mentally), but don't force them to use it, and don't single them out if they don't want to.</p><p>My suspician is that this is yet another vapourware patent that we'll never see any actual implementation of.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't * HAVE * to buy the game...I think the sentiment here is that if M $ brings this sort of technology on the market , they will likely " innovate " themselves right out of the market.Not only does this act to descriminate against users , it also singles them out and takes away one of the reasons people play these games to begin with ( to escape reality ) .
There are also heaps of privacy concerns in this , as it would almost certainly require user consent to glean data from medical records.I ca n't see this actually coming to fruition and making them any kind of money.Nintendo 's approach was much better .
Introduce the tools that people can use to get fit ( physically and mentally ) , but do n't force them to use it , and do n't single them out if they do n't want to.My suspician is that this is yet another vapourware patent that we 'll never see any actual implementation of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't *HAVE* to buy the game...I think the sentiment here is that if M$ brings this sort of technology on the market, they will likely "innovate" themselves right out of the market.Not only does this act to descriminate against users, it also singles them out and takes away one of the reasons people play these games to begin with (to escape reality).
There are also heaps of privacy concerns in this, as it would almost certainly require user consent to glean data from medical records.I can't see this actually coming to fruition and making them any kind of money.Nintendo's approach was much better.
Introduce the tools that people can use to get fit (physically and mentally), but don't force them to use it, and don't single them out if they don't want to.My suspician is that this is yet another vapourware patent that we'll never see any actual implementation of.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850</id>
	<title>WTF???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc.'</p></div></blockquote><p>Where, exactly, does Microsoft think it's going to get this stuff from?  The summary actually makes reference to health records.</p><p>Heck, I'm not sure most government agencies should have access to most of that information.  Microsoft sure as fsck has no business with it.</p><p>Welcome to the dystopian future, fat boy.  This is actually kind of scary.</p><p>Cheers</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level , geographic location , age , sex , intelligence quotient , socioeconomic class , occupation , marital/relationship status , religious belief , political affiliation , etc .
'Where , exactly , does Microsoft think it 's going to get this stuff from ?
The summary actually makes reference to health records.Heck , I 'm not sure most government agencies should have access to most of that information .
Microsoft sure as fsck has no business with it.Welcome to the dystopian future , fat boy .
This is actually kind of scary.Cheers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc.
'Where, exactly, does Microsoft think it's going to get this stuff from?
The summary actually makes reference to health records.Heck, I'm not sure most government agencies should have access to most of that information.
Microsoft sure as fsck has no business with it.Welcome to the dystopian future, fat boy.
This is actually kind of scary.Cheers
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491864</id>
	<title>Brain-dead</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1261169160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The precise point of video games is to be some other than yourself for awhile. If they start restricting people based on their physical appearance, how long until we start using other biometric data? The major appeal of video games is shattered when we lose that... who wants to play a video game as themselves?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The precise point of video games is to be some other than yourself for awhile .
If they start restricting people based on their physical appearance , how long until we start using other biometric data ?
The major appeal of video games is shattered when we lose that... who wants to play a video game as themselves ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The precise point of video games is to be some other than yourself for awhile.
If they start restricting people based on their physical appearance, how long until we start using other biometric data?
The major appeal of video games is shattered when we lose that... who wants to play a video game as themselves?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496894</id>
	<title>WhattheHoly......</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261163160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Erm, so is Microsoft to be viewed as pursuing a defense of truth in advertising? Or as being an asshat engaging in passive-aggressive defamation of character?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Erm , so is Microsoft to be viewed as pursuing a defense of truth in advertising ?
Or as being an asshat engaging in passive-aggressive defamation of character ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Erm, so is Microsoft to be viewed as pursuing a defense of truth in advertising?
Or as being an asshat engaging in passive-aggressive defamation of character?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492232</id>
	<title>Experience shaping</title>
	<author>Kenoli</author>
	<datestamp>1261127220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc</p></div><p>Even if they could somehow get all that information from players, what difference would it make?<br>
<br>
Maybe when they said "gaming experiences" what they actually meant was "ridiculous chat systems that have nothing to do with games".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level , geographic location , age , sex , intelligence quotient , socioeconomic class , occupation , marital/relationship status , religious belief , political affiliation , etcEven if they could somehow get all that information from players , what difference would it make ?
Maybe when they said " gaming experiences " what they actually meant was " ridiculous chat systems that have nothing to do with games " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etcEven if they could somehow get all that information from players, what difference would it make?
Maybe when they said "gaming experiences" what they actually meant was "ridiculous chat systems that have nothing to do with games".
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30535830</id>
	<title>What if I am playing a Fitness game?</title>
	<author>Stregano</author>
	<datestamp>1259773440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What if I am playing DDR or some game where I actually stay active.  I can actually gain a sweat from Tony Hawk Ride (and a good sweat at that as well).
<br> <br>
So Microsoft will turn off or ban my X-Box when I am playing a game that keeps me active?  That sounds pretty dumb if you ask me.
<br> <br>
I have actually lost over 50 pounds.  I used to weigh right around 315 and got down to 250.  My motivation to get even more active with working out was playing video games that kept me active like Benami dancing games.
<br> <br>
There are alot of games that keep up on our feet now.  Microsoft would need to check and ensure I am not playing one of those games.
<br> <br>
This will also open the door for a buttload of shovelware that keeps you active as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What if I am playing DDR or some game where I actually stay active .
I can actually gain a sweat from Tony Hawk Ride ( and a good sweat at that as well ) .
So Microsoft will turn off or ban my X-Box when I am playing a game that keeps me active ?
That sounds pretty dumb if you ask me .
I have actually lost over 50 pounds .
I used to weigh right around 315 and got down to 250 .
My motivation to get even more active with working out was playing video games that kept me active like Benami dancing games .
There are alot of games that keep up on our feet now .
Microsoft would need to check and ensure I am not playing one of those games .
This will also open the door for a buttload of shovelware that keeps you active as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if I am playing DDR or some game where I actually stay active.
I can actually gain a sweat from Tony Hawk Ride (and a good sweat at that as well).
So Microsoft will turn off or ban my X-Box when I am playing a game that keeps me active?
That sounds pretty dumb if you ask me.
I have actually lost over 50 pounds.
I used to weigh right around 315 and got down to 250.
My motivation to get even more active with working out was playing video games that kept me active like Benami dancing games.
There are alot of games that keep up on our feet now.
Microsoft would need to check and ensure I am not playing one of those games.
This will also open the door for a buttload of shovelware that keeps you active as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493484</id>
	<title>Re:You think this doesn't effect you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261132080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But where am I going to be able to find one of those on the Internet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But where am I going to be able to find one of those on the Internet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But where am I going to be able to find one of those on the Internet?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491976</id>
	<title>Profit Margins - not so much</title>
	<author>bruciferofbrm</author>
	<datestamp>1261169520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine how this will work.</p><p>Overweight people will be banned from a game if they don't 'get fit'.  Those who really want to play will then 'get to it' and get in shape.</p><p>Of course with all that exercise and new activity they are participating in will slowly bring them to realize there is something else to life then online avatar based games (with very shallow user access requirements). Slowly they will turn away from such games and begin doing things that are more active and fit in with their new health conscious life style.</p><p>Profits in gaming start to fall off because they banned all the people who pay to play and be someone else. When they got to the point they would qualify to play the game, they no longer had the mindset to want to play the game.</p><p>And there go my Microsoft stocks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine how this will work.Overweight people will be banned from a game if they do n't 'get fit' .
Those who really want to play will then 'get to it ' and get in shape.Of course with all that exercise and new activity they are participating in will slowly bring them to realize there is something else to life then online avatar based games ( with very shallow user access requirements ) .
Slowly they will turn away from such games and begin doing things that are more active and fit in with their new health conscious life style.Profits in gaming start to fall off because they banned all the people who pay to play and be someone else .
When they got to the point they would qualify to play the game , they no longer had the mindset to want to play the game.And there go my Microsoft stocks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine how this will work.Overweight people will be banned from a game if they don't 'get fit'.
Those who really want to play will then 'get to it' and get in shape.Of course with all that exercise and new activity they are participating in will slowly bring them to realize there is something else to life then online avatar based games (with very shallow user access requirements).
Slowly they will turn away from such games and begin doing things that are more active and fit in with their new health conscious life style.Profits in gaming start to fall off because they banned all the people who pay to play and be someone else.
When they got to the point they would qualify to play the game, they no longer had the mindset to want to play the game.And there go my Microsoft stocks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497894</id>
	<title>Rockband avatar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261228860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's funny thing, I was playing Rockband 1 and upon urging of my friends, I decided to make a character for my game. Now, I'm not too fat, but I decided that I was going to make a fat character for my game. Why make your avatar look just like you? I wanted to create a Jack Black esque character. So I found the weight slider and move it to heavy. Unfortunately the made my character muscular. I told my buddies, "Dammit, I don't wanna be buff, I wanna be fat!" The idea that someone would want to create a fat character didn't even cross the developers mind.</p><p>This reminds me of another article on Second Life that said there were no fat avatars in that game either. Not because the capability wasn't there, but nobody, and I mean, NOBODY, elected to do so. We need more fat video game characters and avatars. Aren't you tired of always playing a hard bodied hero in every game?</p><p>In film there's the everyman character. But we have yet to see that in games. The closest thing I can think of is Nathan Drake, with his easy going attitude. That's ridiculous though, cuz he's a globe trotting treasure hunting babe magnet. I can't identify with him.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's funny thing , I was playing Rockband 1 and upon urging of my friends , I decided to make a character for my game .
Now , I 'm not too fat , but I decided that I was going to make a fat character for my game .
Why make your avatar look just like you ?
I wanted to create a Jack Black esque character .
So I found the weight slider and move it to heavy .
Unfortunately the made my character muscular .
I told my buddies , " Dammit , I do n't wan na be buff , I wan na be fat !
" The idea that someone would want to create a fat character did n't even cross the developers mind.This reminds me of another article on Second Life that said there were no fat avatars in that game either .
Not because the capability was n't there , but nobody , and I mean , NOBODY , elected to do so .
We need more fat video game characters and avatars .
Are n't you tired of always playing a hard bodied hero in every game ? In film there 's the everyman character .
But we have yet to see that in games .
The closest thing I can think of is Nathan Drake , with his easy going attitude .
That 's ridiculous though , cuz he 's a globe trotting treasure hunting babe magnet .
I ca n't identify with him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's funny thing, I was playing Rockband 1 and upon urging of my friends, I decided to make a character for my game.
Now, I'm not too fat, but I decided that I was going to make a fat character for my game.
Why make your avatar look just like you?
I wanted to create a Jack Black esque character.
So I found the weight slider and move it to heavy.
Unfortunately the made my character muscular.
I told my buddies, "Dammit, I don't wanna be buff, I wanna be fat!
" The idea that someone would want to create a fat character didn't even cross the developers mind.This reminds me of another article on Second Life that said there were no fat avatars in that game either.
Not because the capability wasn't there, but nobody, and I mean, NOBODY, elected to do so.
We need more fat video game characters and avatars.
Aren't you tired of always playing a hard bodied hero in every game?In film there's the everyman character.
But we have yet to see that in games.
The closest thing I can think of is Nathan Drake, with his easy going attitude.
That's ridiculous though, cuz he's a globe trotting treasure hunting babe magnet.
I can't identify with him.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492794</id>
	<title>Hello? What do you think where all those...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... wii (and other) extra-controllers for.</p><p>Dance-pads, workout-pads, virtual body-suits... suddenly, you have some system that "pretends" to let you be the "Dance Master 3.0" or some "wristband-controller that does not even lies in your hand"... but in fact you have gizmos that send your weight and your wrist-size to . Hohoho!</p><p>Don't believe them! They are after your weight!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... wii ( and other ) extra-controllers for.Dance-pads , workout-pads , virtual body-suits... suddenly , you have some system that " pretends " to let you be the " Dance Master 3.0 " or some " wristband-controller that does not even lies in your hand " ... but in fact you have gizmos that send your weight and your wrist-size to .
Hohoho ! Do n't believe them !
They are after your weight !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... wii (and other) extra-controllers for.Dance-pads, workout-pads, virtual body-suits... suddenly, you have some system that "pretends" to let you be the "Dance Master 3.0" or some "wristband-controller that does not even lies in your hand"... but in fact you have gizmos that send your weight and your wrist-size to .
Hohoho!Don't believe them!
They are after your weight!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30559822</id>
	<title>Disability</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261835820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how this is going to work for disabled people. I'm overweight because I can't walk, which happens to be the same reason I play so many video games instead of exercising (which I do actually do, in a way, but it's physiotherapy). Even if there's an opt out or a "disabled" get out option I don't think I want to use it, the opt outers will just be labelled as fatties who are embarrassed to tell people their real weight and I don't want a great big "disabled" tag on my avatar. The great thing about the anonymity online gaming is that nobody knows I'm disabled, people mean to be nice but as soon as they find out they start being a bit too nice, like I'm a kid playing with adults who needs everyone around them to hold back. I really prefer it when no one knows.</p><p>I won't be happy if we have to put our real genders in either. I'm female but I usually play as a man to avoid the sexual harrassment, rape threats (have had these) and the embarrassment when 13 year old boys ask if you have a boyfriend (I'm 27). But who knows, maybe I won't have to worry about this stuff when all my characters are fatties in wheelchairs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how this is going to work for disabled people .
I 'm overweight because I ca n't walk , which happens to be the same reason I play so many video games instead of exercising ( which I do actually do , in a way , but it 's physiotherapy ) .
Even if there 's an opt out or a " disabled " get out option I do n't think I want to use it , the opt outers will just be labelled as fatties who are embarrassed to tell people their real weight and I do n't want a great big " disabled " tag on my avatar .
The great thing about the anonymity online gaming is that nobody knows I 'm disabled , people mean to be nice but as soon as they find out they start being a bit too nice , like I 'm a kid playing with adults who needs everyone around them to hold back .
I really prefer it when no one knows.I wo n't be happy if we have to put our real genders in either .
I 'm female but I usually play as a man to avoid the sexual harrassment , rape threats ( have had these ) and the embarrassment when 13 year old boys ask if you have a boyfriend ( I 'm 27 ) .
But who knows , maybe I wo n't have to worry about this stuff when all my characters are fatties in wheelchairs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how this is going to work for disabled people.
I'm overweight because I can't walk, which happens to be the same reason I play so many video games instead of exercising (which I do actually do, in a way, but it's physiotherapy).
Even if there's an opt out or a "disabled" get out option I don't think I want to use it, the opt outers will just be labelled as fatties who are embarrassed to tell people their real weight and I don't want a great big "disabled" tag on my avatar.
The great thing about the anonymity online gaming is that nobody knows I'm disabled, people mean to be nice but as soon as they find out they start being a bit too nice, like I'm a kid playing with adults who needs everyone around them to hold back.
I really prefer it when no one knows.I won't be happy if we have to put our real genders in either.
I'm female but I usually play as a man to avoid the sexual harrassment, rape threats (have had these) and the embarrassment when 13 year old boys ask if you have a boyfriend (I'm 27).
But who knows, maybe I won't have to worry about this stuff when all my characters are fatties in wheelchairs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497750</id>
	<title>Shit, and I used to worry about the nanny *State*?</title>
	<author>jcr</author>
	<datestamp>1261225680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not that I have any plans to become a Microsoft customer, but still.  The idea of having exercise advice shoved down my throat by a company run by that tub of goo, Steve Ballmer, is beyond asinine.</p><p>-jcr</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not that I have any plans to become a Microsoft customer , but still .
The idea of having exercise advice shoved down my throat by a company run by that tub of goo , Steve Ballmer , is beyond asinine.-jcr</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not that I have any plans to become a Microsoft customer, but still.
The idea of having exercise advice shoved down my throat by a company run by that tub of goo, Steve Ballmer, is beyond asinine.-jcr</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494374</id>
	<title>Re:*cough* HIPAA</title>
	<author>joemck</author>
	<datestamp>1261136760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>it just adds inconvenience when I want to do simple things like having a family member pick up one of my prescriptions ("Oh my god! We could never allow that, even if we had written authorization on file! Think of your privacy!").</p></div><p>That's DEFINITELY store policy rather than regulation. The Rite-Aid stores near Boston allow family members to pick up prescriptions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>it just adds inconvenience when I want to do simple things like having a family member pick up one of my prescriptions ( " Oh my god !
We could never allow that , even if we had written authorization on file !
Think of your privacy !
" ) .That 's DEFINITELY store policy rather than regulation .
The Rite-Aid stores near Boston allow family members to pick up prescriptions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it just adds inconvenience when I want to do simple things like having a family member pick up one of my prescriptions ("Oh my god!
We could never allow that, even if we had written authorization on file!
Think of your privacy!
").That's DEFINITELY store policy rather than regulation.
The Rite-Aid stores near Boston allow family members to pick up prescriptions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492874</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491874</id>
	<title>What part of "game" do they not understand?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somebody doesn't get it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody does n't get it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody doesn't get it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492544</id>
	<title>This doesn't pass the laugh test</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To see this from Microsoft, implying a digital community where people's avatars are based on their real-world identities?<br>X-Box Live is the anonymous gamers' paradise. Memberships are payable by untraceable prepaid game time cards, and the user space is littered with false identities and anonymous faces.<br>Or did you think d00bietoker420 was his real name?<br>At what point do they expect their pre-existing customer base to go legit and start signing up with real identities that would allow this system to even work, dystopian Orwellian connotations not withstanding?</p><p>Signed,<br>Anonymous Coward.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To see this from Microsoft , implying a digital community where people 's avatars are based on their real-world identities ? X-Box Live is the anonymous gamers ' paradise .
Memberships are payable by untraceable prepaid game time cards , and the user space is littered with false identities and anonymous faces.Or did you think d00bietoker420 was his real name ? At what point do they expect their pre-existing customer base to go legit and start signing up with real identities that would allow this system to even work , dystopian Orwellian connotations not withstanding ? Signed,Anonymous Coward .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To see this from Microsoft, implying a digital community where people's avatars are based on their real-world identities?X-Box Live is the anonymous gamers' paradise.
Memberships are payable by untraceable prepaid game time cards, and the user space is littered with false identities and anonymous faces.Or did you think d00bietoker420 was his real name?At what point do they expect their pre-existing customer base to go legit and start signing up with real identities that would allow this system to even work, dystopian Orwellian connotations not withstanding?Signed,Anonymous Coward.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30498150</id>
	<title>Re:Profit Margins - not so much</title>
	<author>tokul</author>
	<datestamp>1261233960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Those who really want to play will then 'get to it' and get in shape.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Those who want to play will lie about their physical stats or will play games that don't discriminate them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those who really want to play will then 'get to it ' and get in shape .
Those who want to play will lie about their physical stats or will play games that do n't discriminate them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those who really want to play will then 'get to it' and get in shape.
Those who want to play will lie about their physical stats or will play games that don't discriminate them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497180</id>
	<title>Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor</title>
	<author>raehl</author>
	<datestamp>1261254780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I hope that the photo of the overweight dressed with Nintendo garb is from someone you know, and that they gave permission for you to humiliate them in front of thousands of other people.</i></p><p>What makes you think the picture is humiliating?</p><p>If you think the picture is humiliating, aren't you the problem?</p><p>If we all thought there was nothing wrong with the picture, then there wouldn't be anything humiliating about it, would there?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope that the photo of the overweight dressed with Nintendo garb is from someone you know , and that they gave permission for you to humiliate them in front of thousands of other people.What makes you think the picture is humiliating ? If you think the picture is humiliating , are n't you the problem ? If we all thought there was nothing wrong with the picture , then there would n't be anything humiliating about it , would there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope that the photo of the overweight dressed with Nintendo garb is from someone you know, and that they gave permission for you to humiliate them in front of thousands of other people.What makes you think the picture is humiliating?If you think the picture is humiliating, aren't you the problem?If we all thought there was nothing wrong with the picture, then there wouldn't be anything humiliating about it, would there?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492256</id>
	<title>Where did'ja...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where did'ja get my picture from?  I locked my Facebook profile.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where did'ja get my picture from ?
I locked my Facebook profile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where did'ja get my picture from?
I locked my Facebook profile.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30500268</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>DrXym</author>
	<datestamp>1261213440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I have long believed that is the American obsession with image and sexuality that has aggravated the problem of obesity. Nearly every 'good' cure to obesity (omitting dangerous diet pills or starvation diets) involves social interaction of some kind. Lampooning people who suffer from obesity only furthers their isolation and in no way is productive towards recovery. </i>
<p>
Actually I think the cause is far more obvious. Walk into any US supermarket and note how many aisles are devoted to snack / junk products compared to a European supermarket. Also note the size of packets, and the bullshit "nutrition advice" on the back where the smallest packet of crisps (potato chips) will say 3 servings or similar. Walk into any food court and note the virtual absence of any healthy food. Walk into any restaurant and note the size of the portions. Note the layout of most towns and note that a car is virtually obligatory. The cause is simple - too much fatty, high calorie junk food combined with a sedentary lifestyle.
</p><p>
Europe has fatties too and in no small part its because its going down the same road as the US. I think there is no easy answer to eliminate obesity, but a good start might be to impose maximum fat / calorific limits on certain packaged foodstuffs and force nutrition advice to be for the entire packet and per 100 gram, as per Europe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have long believed that is the American obsession with image and sexuality that has aggravated the problem of obesity .
Nearly every 'good ' cure to obesity ( omitting dangerous diet pills or starvation diets ) involves social interaction of some kind .
Lampooning people who suffer from obesity only furthers their isolation and in no way is productive towards recovery .
Actually I think the cause is far more obvious .
Walk into any US supermarket and note how many aisles are devoted to snack / junk products compared to a European supermarket .
Also note the size of packets , and the bullshit " nutrition advice " on the back where the smallest packet of crisps ( potato chips ) will say 3 servings or similar .
Walk into any food court and note the virtual absence of any healthy food .
Walk into any restaurant and note the size of the portions .
Note the layout of most towns and note that a car is virtually obligatory .
The cause is simple - too much fatty , high calorie junk food combined with a sedentary lifestyle .
Europe has fatties too and in no small part its because its going down the same road as the US .
I think there is no easy answer to eliminate obesity , but a good start might be to impose maximum fat / calorific limits on certain packaged foodstuffs and force nutrition advice to be for the entire packet and per 100 gram , as per Europe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have long believed that is the American obsession with image and sexuality that has aggravated the problem of obesity.
Nearly every 'good' cure to obesity (omitting dangerous diet pills or starvation diets) involves social interaction of some kind.
Lampooning people who suffer from obesity only furthers their isolation and in no way is productive towards recovery.
Actually I think the cause is far more obvious.
Walk into any US supermarket and note how many aisles are devoted to snack / junk products compared to a European supermarket.
Also note the size of packets, and the bullshit "nutrition advice" on the back where the smallest packet of crisps (potato chips) will say 3 servings or similar.
Walk into any food court and note the virtual absence of any healthy food.
Walk into any restaurant and note the size of the portions.
Note the layout of most towns and note that a car is virtually obligatory.
The cause is simple - too much fatty, high calorie junk food combined with a sedentary lifestyle.
Europe has fatties too and in no small part its because its going down the same road as the US.
I think there is no easy answer to eliminate obesity, but a good start might be to impose maximum fat / calorific limits on certain packaged foodstuffs and force nutrition advice to be for the entire packet and per 100 gram, as per Europe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30498340</id>
	<title>This will never be implemented in a game</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261236240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Features are supposed to help sell games when they're in a nice bullet-point on the back of the box. I don't see anyone in charge of making a game wasting resources on a feature which is likely to decrease sales.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Features are supposed to help sell games when they 're in a nice bullet-point on the back of the box .
I do n't see anyone in charge of making a game wasting resources on a feature which is likely to decrease sales .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Features are supposed to help sell games when they're in a nice bullet-point on the back of the box.
I don't see anyone in charge of making a game wasting resources on a feature which is likely to decrease sales.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491738</id>
	<title>Scary</title>
	<author>Sumbius</author>
	<datestamp>1261168740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So soon, if this trend keeps gaining wind under its wings, WoW will be flooded with millions of fatass female elfs and midgets... Well, they get whats coming to them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So soon , if this trend keeps gaining wind under its wings , WoW will be flooded with millions of fatass female elfs and midgets... Well , they get whats coming to them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So soon, if this trend keeps gaining wind under its wings, WoW will be flooded with millions of fatass female elfs and midgets... Well, they get whats coming to them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493410</id>
	<title>Re:You think this doesn't effect you</title>
	<author>FlyMysticalDJ</author>
	<datestamp>1261131780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It kind of defeats the purpose of a "Role-Playing" game. I think They should also make it so that to play as a rogue, you must have a criminal record for having stolen something, and to play a warrior you must have a record of having killed someone. Oh yeah and to be a wizard you must have a record of having broken the laws of physics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It kind of defeats the purpose of a " Role-Playing " game .
I think They should also make it so that to play as a rogue , you must have a criminal record for having stolen something , and to play a warrior you must have a record of having killed someone .
Oh yeah and to be a wizard you must have a record of having broken the laws of physics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It kind of defeats the purpose of a "Role-Playing" game.
I think They should also make it so that to play as a rogue, you must have a criminal record for having stolen something, and to play a warrior you must have a record of having killed someone.
Oh yeah and to be a wizard you must have a record of having broken the laws of physics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30498638</id>
	<title>Re:You want to patent something useful...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261240260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "stats by medical record" is pretty flawed.  Again, to ignore the elephantine privacy concerns this concept raises, how does the game handle someone who is 6'1, 245 lbs and, oh yeah, 5\% body fat?  Is their examination of medical records thorough enough to give the person a bodybuilder's physique, rather than a kettle belly and flabby arms?  What about ridiculously skinny media sponges who get out of breath from pulling their twiggy frames up a few flights of stairs?  Do they come out as lithe elven ranger types capable of running over hill and dale for three days and three nights straight?</p><p>Almost ten years ago, I was playing Everquest, and being a deceptively fit gamer nerd, I was idly thinking about something kind of like this.  The conclusion I came to was that the company running the game would be best served by opening its own fitness evaluation shops in urban centers, then contracting with a chain of gyms in less populated locales to do additional testing.  People could go in, pay for an examination, then go through some basic endurance, strength, and quickness tests to determine the stats of their characters.  They could also take a glorified IQ test to determine their characters' "intelligence."  To combat local bias (aka cheating/bribing/befriending the local gym clerk), the player could get a free 5-10\% stat bonus in-game by going to one of the company-licensed stores, where presumably any employee found inputting bad data could be fired.  Even if this system worked at all, I didn't think it would be a money-making concept unless the game was absolutely top-tier and planned to keep running for several years.  I also thought that the game would have trouble surviving for another reason. The testing process would inevitably encourage some idiot to develop a performance-boosting drug habit or to simply run their body to death trying to get just a few more stat points for the game.  The ensuing media outrage and liability suit would be crushing.  Waivers of liability would sit right next to the game EULA, of course, but I'm uncertain as to whether they'd be enough to shield the game administrators from legal grief.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " stats by medical record " is pretty flawed .
Again , to ignore the elephantine privacy concerns this concept raises , how does the game handle someone who is 6'1 , 245 lbs and , oh yeah , 5 \ % body fat ?
Is their examination of medical records thorough enough to give the person a bodybuilder 's physique , rather than a kettle belly and flabby arms ?
What about ridiculously skinny media sponges who get out of breath from pulling their twiggy frames up a few flights of stairs ?
Do they come out as lithe elven ranger types capable of running over hill and dale for three days and three nights straight ? Almost ten years ago , I was playing Everquest , and being a deceptively fit gamer nerd , I was idly thinking about something kind of like this .
The conclusion I came to was that the company running the game would be best served by opening its own fitness evaluation shops in urban centers , then contracting with a chain of gyms in less populated locales to do additional testing .
People could go in , pay for an examination , then go through some basic endurance , strength , and quickness tests to determine the stats of their characters .
They could also take a glorified IQ test to determine their characters ' " intelligence .
" To combat local bias ( aka cheating/bribing/befriending the local gym clerk ) , the player could get a free 5-10 \ % stat bonus in-game by going to one of the company-licensed stores , where presumably any employee found inputting bad data could be fired .
Even if this system worked at all , I did n't think it would be a money-making concept unless the game was absolutely top-tier and planned to keep running for several years .
I also thought that the game would have trouble surviving for another reason .
The testing process would inevitably encourage some idiot to develop a performance-boosting drug habit or to simply run their body to death trying to get just a few more stat points for the game .
The ensuing media outrage and liability suit would be crushing .
Waivers of liability would sit right next to the game EULA , of course , but I 'm uncertain as to whether they 'd be enough to shield the game administrators from legal grief .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "stats by medical record" is pretty flawed.
Again, to ignore the elephantine privacy concerns this concept raises, how does the game handle someone who is 6'1, 245 lbs and, oh yeah, 5\% body fat?
Is their examination of medical records thorough enough to give the person a bodybuilder's physique, rather than a kettle belly and flabby arms?
What about ridiculously skinny media sponges who get out of breath from pulling their twiggy frames up a few flights of stairs?
Do they come out as lithe elven ranger types capable of running over hill and dale for three days and three nights straight?Almost ten years ago, I was playing Everquest, and being a deceptively fit gamer nerd, I was idly thinking about something kind of like this.
The conclusion I came to was that the company running the game would be best served by opening its own fitness evaluation shops in urban centers, then contracting with a chain of gyms in less populated locales to do additional testing.
People could go in, pay for an examination, then go through some basic endurance, strength, and quickness tests to determine the stats of their characters.
They could also take a glorified IQ test to determine their characters' "intelligence.
"  To combat local bias (aka cheating/bribing/befriending the local gym clerk), the player could get a free 5-10\% stat bonus in-game by going to one of the company-licensed stores, where presumably any employee found inputting bad data could be fired.
Even if this system worked at all, I didn't think it would be a money-making concept unless the game was absolutely top-tier and planned to keep running for several years.
I also thought that the game would have trouble surviving for another reason.
The testing process would inevitably encourage some idiot to develop a performance-boosting drug habit or to simply run their body to death trying to get just a few more stat points for the game.
The ensuing media outrage and liability suit would be crushing.
Waivers of liability would sit right next to the game EULA, of course, but I'm uncertain as to whether they'd be enough to shield the game administrators from legal grief.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497340</id>
	<title>Re:Pot, kettle, black.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261216200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this sounds allot like a new game developing quick put up your patton!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this sounds allot like a new game developing quick put up your patton !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this sounds allot like a new game developing quick put up your patton!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492060</id>
	<title>Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor</title>
	<author>space\_jake</author>
	<datestamp>1261169820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kid probably shouldn't have set his Facebook profile settings to Everyone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kid probably should n't have set his Facebook profile settings to Everyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kid probably shouldn't have set his Facebook profile settings to Everyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492896</id>
	<title>Yeah, but once they learn about that trick . . .</title>
	<author>StefanJ</author>
	<datestamp>1261129740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>. . . PCs and consoles will come equipped with a robot arm that feels you up to determine your <i>real</i> gender.</p><p>Or course, some users would pay extra for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.
. .
PCs and consoles will come equipped with a robot arm that feels you up to determine your real gender.Or course , some users would pay extra for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
. .
PCs and consoles will come equipped with a robot arm that feels you up to determine your real gender.Or course, some users would pay extra for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497982</id>
	<title>In related news ...</title>
	<author>BodhiCat</author>
	<datestamp>1261230900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In related news, Microsoft patented the act of inhaling oxygen and exhaling co2.  A judge has issued an injunction against breathing for everyone until the case is resolved.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In related news , Microsoft patented the act of inhaling oxygen and exhaling co2 .
A judge has issued an injunction against breathing for everyone until the case is resolved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In related news, Microsoft patented the act of inhaling oxygen and exhaling co2.
A judge has issued an injunction against breathing for everyone until the case is resolved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748</id>
	<title>You think this doesn't effect you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this mean I won't be able to play as a 36-24-26 blonde woman anymore? If Microsoft starts actually checking players appearance and gender, I predict there will be absolutely no "hot chick" avatars in the Microsoft MMORPGs! Is this "sausage fest" environment really the result they are looking for?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean I wo n't be able to play as a 36-24-26 blonde woman anymore ?
If Microsoft starts actually checking players appearance and gender , I predict there will be absolutely no " hot chick " avatars in the Microsoft MMORPGs !
Is this " sausage fest " environment really the result they are looking for ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean I won't be able to play as a 36-24-26 blonde woman anymore?
If Microsoft starts actually checking players appearance and gender, I predict there will be absolutely no "hot chick" avatars in the Microsoft MMORPGs!
Is this "sausage fest" environment really the result they are looking for?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492892</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>Ogive17</author>
	<datestamp>1261129680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Japanese make fun of fat people that aren't sumo wrestlers.  The Chinese make derogatory comments towards the Japanese calling them fat.<br>
<br>
So no, it's not just an American problem.  Maybe it's you who needs to get out into the world a bit more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Japanese make fun of fat people that are n't sumo wrestlers .
The Chinese make derogatory comments towards the Japanese calling them fat .
So no , it 's not just an American problem .
Maybe it 's you who needs to get out into the world a bit more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Japanese make fun of fat people that aren't sumo wrestlers.
The Chinese make derogatory comments towards the Japanese calling them fat.
So no, it's not just an American problem.
Maybe it's you who needs to get out into the world a bit more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497308</id>
	<title>Fatboy, your never gonna sit next to me again!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261215540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How much will the "no-fatboy-next-seat" premium be on cinemas, airlines,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... ?</p><p>When oil runs out we can burn them for heating.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How much will the " no-fatboy-next-seat " premium be on cinemas , airlines , ... ? When oil runs out we can burn them for heating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much will the "no-fatboy-next-seat" premium be on cinemas, airlines, ... ?When oil runs out we can burn them for heating.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492358</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm hoping this idea is merely ridiculous, not scary as shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm hoping this idea is merely ridiculous , not scary as shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm hoping this idea is merely ridiculous, not scary as shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492472</id>
	<title>Blue Pill now for weight loss?</title>
	<author>John Whitley</author>
	<datestamp>1261128000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"You are no longer an optimum energy producing unit.  You are being ejected from the Matrix.  Goodbye!"</p><p>&lt;schlorp, spitooie!&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" You are no longer an optimum energy producing unit .
You are being ejected from the Matrix .
Goodbye ! "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You are no longer an optimum energy producing unit.
You are being ejected from the Matrix.
Goodbye!"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30501042</id>
	<title>Re:HA!</title>
	<author>jennyfever</author>
	<datestamp>1261224840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get into the games business and you could get paid, apparently.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get into the games business and you could get paid , apparently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get into the games business and you could get paid, apparently.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491732</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30507248</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261309080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You guys are idiots... This would not look into the medical records, of course... due to HIPAA. All they would have to do is make a scale like system to weigh and idividual. Making it so it knew how much you truely weigh, (And of course there will always be a way to cheat with this system, i mean you can lie about your age on the internet so you can lie about your weight)</p><p>Do you guys really take this personal? I think this is a great way for people who REALLY care about their weight and love games, to get into shape by motivating theirself by playing a game. It is a great! Idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You guys are idiots... This would not look into the medical records , of course... due to HIPAA .
All they would have to do is make a scale like system to weigh and idividual .
Making it so it knew how much you truely weigh , ( And of course there will always be a way to cheat with this system , i mean you can lie about your age on the internet so you can lie about your weight ) Do you guys really take this personal ?
I think this is a great way for people who REALLY care about their weight and love games , to get into shape by motivating theirself by playing a game .
It is a great !
Idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You guys are idiots... This would not look into the medical records, of course... due to HIPAA.
All they would have to do is make a scale like system to weigh and idividual.
Making it so it knew how much you truely weigh, (And of course there will always be a way to cheat with this system, i mean you can lie about your age on the internet so you can lie about your weight)Do you guys really take this personal?
I think this is a great way for people who REALLY care about their weight and love games, to get into shape by motivating theirself by playing a game.
It is a great!
Idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492418</id>
	<title>Wii beat 'em to it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This already happens with the Wii Fit. When you do your weigh in, the girth of your avatar is adjusted to reflect your actual weight. Heck it even "that's overweight" or "that's obese" when it chimes in with your weight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This already happens with the Wii Fit .
When you do your weigh in , the girth of your avatar is adjusted to reflect your actual weight .
Heck it even " that 's overweight " or " that 's obese " when it chimes in with your weight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This already happens with the Wii Fit.
When you do your weigh in, the girth of your avatar is adjusted to reflect your actual weight.
Heck it even "that's overweight" or "that's obese" when it chimes in with your weight.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491646</id>
	<title>Wii Fit already does this.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Prior art in Wii Fit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Prior art in Wii Fit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Prior art in Wii Fit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491984</id>
	<title>Re:And presumably all this will be done....</title>
	<author>umbrellasd</author>
	<datestamp>1261169580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only if we also require operating systems to show a splash screen with a person as correspondingly fat as the operating system itself.  Welcome to FattyOS!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only if we also require operating systems to show a splash screen with a person as correspondingly fat as the operating system itself .
Welcome to FattyOS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only if we also require operating systems to show a splash screen with a person as correspondingly fat as the operating system itself.
Welcome to FattyOS!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492838</id>
	<title>Re:Discrimination</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People need housing an jobs as basic necessities for life.  We don't need a game system to survive.  There are other forms of entertainment out there for us to enjoy.  Widespread job/housing discrimination eliminates the ability to find any job/home.</p><p>Besides, many companies are allowed to discriminate based on gender/appearance.  Try taking an overweight, 72 year old, unkempt homeless person to a photoshoot for a magazine advertisement.  Gender/appearance is a basic requirement of some jobs, and therefore necessitate discrimination, which is completely legal in that context.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People need housing an jobs as basic necessities for life .
We do n't need a game system to survive .
There are other forms of entertainment out there for us to enjoy .
Widespread job/housing discrimination eliminates the ability to find any job/home.Besides , many companies are allowed to discriminate based on gender/appearance .
Try taking an overweight , 72 year old , unkempt homeless person to a photoshoot for a magazine advertisement .
Gender/appearance is a basic requirement of some jobs , and therefore necessitate discrimination , which is completely legal in that context .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People need housing an jobs as basic necessities for life.
We don't need a game system to survive.
There are other forms of entertainment out there for us to enjoy.
Widespread job/housing discrimination eliminates the ability to find any job/home.Besides, many companies are allowed to discriminate based on gender/appearance.
Try taking an overweight, 72 year old, unkempt homeless person to a photoshoot for a magazine advertisement.
Gender/appearance is a basic requirement of some jobs, and therefore necessitate discrimination, which is completely legal in that context.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495716</id>
	<title>It's MS so who cares, but...</title>
	<author>John Pfeiffer</author>
	<datestamp>1261147740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to wonder what stake Microsoft has in teen suicide and school shootings that they'd think this is a good idea.  A bit of a leap you say?  Let me lay it out for you.</p><p>Fat kid gets home from school, decides to play some games to put the bullshit he had to deal with at school behind him...  Too bad his avatar is fat too!  No escape from the ridicule and stupid crap!  Or even worse, the same people who harass him at school start harassing him online, and then start harassing him at school ABOUT his fat avatar!  BONUS POINTS!</p><p>So, depending on the kid's psychological makeup there are three possible outcomes:</p><ol> <li>Nothing at all. (Unlikely even for the well-adjusted.)</li><li>Suicide. (Probably the more likely of the three.)</li><li>School shooting. (Given access to firearms and having pre-existing psychological issues, I'd have to go with 'yep'.)</li></ol></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to wonder what stake Microsoft has in teen suicide and school shootings that they 'd think this is a good idea .
A bit of a leap you say ?
Let me lay it out for you.Fat kid gets home from school , decides to play some games to put the bullshit he had to deal with at school behind him... Too bad his avatar is fat too !
No escape from the ridicule and stupid crap !
Or even worse , the same people who harass him at school start harassing him online , and then start harassing him at school ABOUT his fat avatar !
BONUS POINTS ! So , depending on the kid 's psychological makeup there are three possible outcomes : Nothing at all .
( Unlikely even for the well-adjusted. ) Suicide .
( Probably the more likely of the three .
) School shooting .
( Given access to firearms and having pre-existing psychological issues , I 'd have to go with 'yep' .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to wonder what stake Microsoft has in teen suicide and school shootings that they'd think this is a good idea.
A bit of a leap you say?
Let me lay it out for you.Fat kid gets home from school, decides to play some games to put the bullshit he had to deal with at school behind him...  Too bad his avatar is fat too!
No escape from the ridicule and stupid crap!
Or even worse, the same people who harass him at school start harassing him online, and then start harassing him at school ABOUT his fat avatar!
BONUS POINTS!So, depending on the kid's psychological makeup there are three possible outcomes: Nothing at all.
(Unlikely even for the well-adjusted.)Suicide.
(Probably the more likely of the three.
)School shooting.
(Given access to firearms and having pre-existing psychological issues, I'd have to go with 'yep'.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492404</id>
	<title>Re:And presumably all this will be done....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But it'll still be stored on a FAT filesystem . . .  or maybe it'll be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExFAT" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">ex-FAT</a> [wikipedia.org], but only after the users trim down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But it 'll still be stored on a FAT filesystem .
. .
or maybe it 'll be ex-FAT [ wikipedia.org ] , but only after the users trim down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it'll still be stored on a FAT filesystem .
. .
or maybe it'll be ex-FAT [wikipedia.org], but only after the users trim down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30527762</id>
	<title>Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261514880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, the guy has a Powerglove. A gamer's most dirty desire.<br>A POWERGLOVE!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , the guy has a Powerglove .
A gamer 's most dirty desire.A POWERGLOVE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, the guy has a Powerglove.
A gamer's most dirty desire.A POWERGLOVE!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491800</id>
	<title>This won't work</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1261168920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A game would have to be pretty compelling otherwise to make the risk of being banned for poor health do anything other than dissuade larger gamers from playing all together.</p><blockquote><div><p>Linking one's gaming avatar to one's physique, explains Microsoft, will produce healthy and virtuous behaviors in individuals.</p></div> </blockquote><p>  Most likely it will reduce the number of people playing any game with this technology in favor of competitor's games and as such is pretty much doomed to fail.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A game would have to be pretty compelling otherwise to make the risk of being banned for poor health do anything other than dissuade larger gamers from playing all together.Linking one 's gaming avatar to one 's physique , explains Microsoft , will produce healthy and virtuous behaviors in individuals .
Most likely it will reduce the number of people playing any game with this technology in favor of competitor 's games and as such is pretty much doomed to fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A game would have to be pretty compelling otherwise to make the risk of being banned for poor health do anything other than dissuade larger gamers from playing all together.Linking one's gaming avatar to one's physique, explains Microsoft, will produce healthy and virtuous behaviors in individuals.
Most likely it will reduce the number of people playing any game with this technology in favor of competitor's games and as such is pretty much doomed to fail.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492574</id>
	<title>No way</title>
	<author>thelonious</author>
	<datestamp>1261128360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who wants to be online and see the ladies sporting a c-section scar?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who wants to be online and see the ladies sporting a c-section scar ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who wants to be online and see the ladies sporting a c-section scar?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493696</id>
	<title>Re:You want to patent something useful...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261133220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, it looks like Microsoft already patented <a href="http://games.slashdot.org/story/09/12/18/1649253/Microsoft-Seeks-Patent-On-Shaming-Fat-Gamers?art\_pos=3" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Avatar Individualized by Physical Characteristic</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , it looks like Microsoft already patented Avatar Individualized by Physical Characteristic [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, it looks like Microsoft already patented Avatar Individualized by Physical Characteristic [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492104</id>
	<title>Another Really Bad MS Idea</title>
	<author>smitty777</author>
	<datestamp>1261169940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are making quite a leap by stating that by shaming someone online will motivate them to loose weight.  I wonder if they can back this up from published research?  This strikes me as extremely ironic, as MS is probably responsible for a great deal of the extra heft that is now plaguing our society.  How many people do you know that now sit in front of a machine that is created and/or run by MS products that would have otherwise been out biking/walking/exercising in some way.  Guilty conscience?  <br>
&nbsp; <br>Also, there are a number of different reasons a person could be overweight - perhaps they are unable to exercise? Are they going to measure MBI?  Or will they just assume that anyone who xxx lb is overweight?  Don't get me started - this strikes me as cut and dried discrimination. <br>
&nbsp; <br>MS is doing a great job with their patents - I wonder if this will fall in to the same category as their recently slashdotted <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/11/20/0145200/Microsoft-Applies-For-Patent-On-Tuftes-Sparklines?art\_pos=1" title="slashdot.org">sparklines</a> [slashdot.org]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are making quite a leap by stating that by shaming someone online will motivate them to loose weight .
I wonder if they can back this up from published research ?
This strikes me as extremely ironic , as MS is probably responsible for a great deal of the extra heft that is now plaguing our society .
How many people do you know that now sit in front of a machine that is created and/or run by MS products that would have otherwise been out biking/walking/exercising in some way .
Guilty conscience ?
  Also , there are a number of different reasons a person could be overweight - perhaps they are unable to exercise ?
Are they going to measure MBI ?
Or will they just assume that anyone who xxx lb is overweight ?
Do n't get me started - this strikes me as cut and dried discrimination .
  MS is doing a great job with their patents - I wonder if this will fall in to the same category as their recently slashdotted sparklines [ slashdot.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are making quite a leap by stating that by shaming someone online will motivate them to loose weight.
I wonder if they can back this up from published research?
This strikes me as extremely ironic, as MS is probably responsible for a great deal of the extra heft that is now plaguing our society.
How many people do you know that now sit in front of a machine that is created and/or run by MS products that would have otherwise been out biking/walking/exercising in some way.
Guilty conscience?
  Also, there are a number of different reasons a person could be overweight - perhaps they are unable to exercise?
Are they going to measure MBI?
Or will they just assume that anyone who xxx lb is overweight?
Don't get me started - this strikes me as cut and dried discrimination.
  MS is doing a great job with their patents - I wonder if this will fall in to the same category as their recently slashdotted sparklines [slashdot.org]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491656</id>
	<title>Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit</title>
	<author>base3</author>
	<datestamp>1261168500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"That's obese!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" That 's obese !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"That's obese!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492678</id>
	<title>Re:From TFA:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This seems like an ADA lawsuit waiting to happen.</p><p>What about people who are, for various health conditions or due to accidents, cannot maintain what Microsoft would consider a "healthy" weight?</p><p>Not to mention all of those "transgendered" folks who will be in an uproar when they cannot play as a female, even though they identify themselves as female, etc... just because their "plumbing" is "wrong"?</p><p>And, finally, what about all of those FBI agents? There will either be an exception for them or suddenly there will no longer be any 14-year-old girls on the Internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems like an ADA lawsuit waiting to happen.What about people who are , for various health conditions or due to accidents , can not maintain what Microsoft would consider a " healthy " weight ? Not to mention all of those " transgendered " folks who will be in an uproar when they can not play as a female , even though they identify themselves as female , etc... just because their " plumbing " is " wrong " ? And , finally , what about all of those FBI agents ?
There will either be an exception for them or suddenly there will no longer be any 14-year-old girls on the Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems like an ADA lawsuit waiting to happen.What about people who are, for various health conditions or due to accidents, cannot maintain what Microsoft would consider a "healthy" weight?Not to mention all of those "transgendered" folks who will be in an uproar when they cannot play as a female, even though they identify themselves as female, etc... just because their "plumbing" is "wrong"?And, finally, what about all of those FBI agents?
There will either be an exception for them or suddenly there will no longer be any 14-year-old girls on the Internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492160</id>
	<title>publish stupid patents to shame the guilty</title>
	<author>bugi</author>
	<datestamp>1261126980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the idea is to publish stupid patents to shame the idiot who filed it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the idea is to publish stupid patents to shame the idiot who filed it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the idea is to publish stupid patents to shame the idiot who filed it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30498888</id>
	<title>Microsoft's alter-ego in other cultures</title>
	<author>mattr</author>
	<datestamp>1261243080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This post once again made me feel extremely nauseated about Microsoft and it got me thinking.<br>People are people all around the world, we are taught different things but there is some kind of psychological DNA if you will, maybe it's based on brain structures or the lack of them, but I have a feeling you will find similar types of personalities in different places.<br>It is why art and stories written centuries ago still strike a chord, why movies from other countries can be endearing.<br>I imagine the Microsoft attracts more pathologies than most companies, and I wonder what positions in society those types of personalities would occupy.<br>I imagine Microsoft execs would feel quite at home sitting on the ruling council of a religious fanatic society in the Middle East.<br>I wonder where in Africa you will find similar personalities.. and where in the U.S. you will find those of the criminal exec-types found in those countries?<br>We should try and recognize a pathology and do something about it, instead of just turning our eyes away. It is gross, nauseating, yes it might make you want to kill yourself if you have to actually have a conversation with these horrible individuals at Microsoft, but maybe we should actually try to remove them from their posts and give them intensive professional counseling before they get taken seriously and have stupid ideas actually implemented.<br>On the other hand, doing nothing is perhaps safest. At least they aren't being handed live weapons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This post once again made me feel extremely nauseated about Microsoft and it got me thinking.People are people all around the world , we are taught different things but there is some kind of psychological DNA if you will , maybe it 's based on brain structures or the lack of them , but I have a feeling you will find similar types of personalities in different places.It is why art and stories written centuries ago still strike a chord , why movies from other countries can be endearing.I imagine the Microsoft attracts more pathologies than most companies , and I wonder what positions in society those types of personalities would occupy.I imagine Microsoft execs would feel quite at home sitting on the ruling council of a religious fanatic society in the Middle East.I wonder where in Africa you will find similar personalities.. and where in the U.S. you will find those of the criminal exec-types found in those countries ? We should try and recognize a pathology and do something about it , instead of just turning our eyes away .
It is gross , nauseating , yes it might make you want to kill yourself if you have to actually have a conversation with these horrible individuals at Microsoft , but maybe we should actually try to remove them from their posts and give them intensive professional counseling before they get taken seriously and have stupid ideas actually implemented.On the other hand , doing nothing is perhaps safest .
At least they are n't being handed live weapons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This post once again made me feel extremely nauseated about Microsoft and it got me thinking.People are people all around the world, we are taught different things but there is some kind of psychological DNA if you will, maybe it's based on brain structures or the lack of them, but I have a feeling you will find similar types of personalities in different places.It is why art and stories written centuries ago still strike a chord, why movies from other countries can be endearing.I imagine the Microsoft attracts more pathologies than most companies, and I wonder what positions in society those types of personalities would occupy.I imagine Microsoft execs would feel quite at home sitting on the ruling council of a religious fanatic society in the Middle East.I wonder where in Africa you will find similar personalities.. and where in the U.S. you will find those of the criminal exec-types found in those countries?We should try and recognize a pathology and do something about it, instead of just turning our eyes away.
It is gross, nauseating, yes it might make you want to kill yourself if you have to actually have a conversation with these horrible individuals at Microsoft, but maybe we should actually try to remove them from their posts and give them intensive professional counseling before they get taken seriously and have stupid ideas actually implemented.On the other hand, doing nothing is perhaps safest.
At least they aren't being handed live weapons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497076</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261165920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay, so I'm a chunky. And I will go ape shit on anyone who tries to blend mandatory fitness with gaming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , so I 'm a chunky .
And I will go ape shit on anyone who tries to blend mandatory fitness with gaming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, so I'm a chunky.
And I will go ape shit on anyone who tries to blend mandatory fitness with gaming.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493020</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>Presto Vivace</author>
	<datestamp>1261130160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to say nothing of humiliating your customer as a business model.</htmltext>
<tokenext>to say nothing of humiliating your customer as a business model .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to say nothing of humiliating your customer as a business model.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30501258</id>
	<title>So, when will</title>
	<author>AlgorithMan</author>
	<datestamp>1261227600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Although I don't think this is a completely bad idea, I have to wonder - when will the NFL, NBA, MLB and NHL be limited to people with an IQ &gt; 120?... exercising the mind would do some of these guys well either, don't you think?...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Although I do n't think this is a completely bad idea , I have to wonder - when will the NFL , NBA , MLB and NHL be limited to people with an IQ &gt; 120 ? .. .
exercising the mind would do some of these guys well either , do n't you think ? .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although I don't think this is a completely bad idea, I have to wonder - when will the NFL, NBA, MLB and NHL be limited to people with an IQ &gt; 120?...
exercising the mind would do some of these guys well either, don't you think?...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493304</id>
	<title>Is it April 1st?</title>
	<author>Wee\_Bit\_Hazed</author>
	<datestamp>1261131420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, did I time warp?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , did I time warp ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, did I time warp?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491958</id>
	<title>Re:And presumably all this will be done....</title>
	<author>LOLLinux</author>
	<datestamp>1261169460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, cause the <a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/story/09/09/22/1239254/According-to-Linus-Linux-Is-Bloated" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Linux kernel isn't bloated or anything</a> [slashdot.org], right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , cause the Linux kernel is n't bloated or anything [ slashdot.org ] , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, cause the Linux kernel isn't bloated or anything [slashdot.org], right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496646</id>
	<title>In related news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261159440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft plan to have get out of that shooting rut by making the replacement for halo about sumo wrestlers</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft plan to have get out of that shooting rut by making the replacement for halo about sumo wrestlers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft plan to have get out of that shooting rut by making the replacement for halo about sumo wrestlers</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496452</id>
	<title>Windows icon will be huuuuge</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1261156620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Microsoft Windows OS's avatar would then take up the whole screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Microsoft Windows OS 's avatar would then take up the whole screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Microsoft Windows OS's avatar would then take up the whole screen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492308</id>
	<title>Not compatible with Bioshock 2.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can only hope this sort of thing is not planned to be incorporated into the multiplayer feature of <i>Bioshock 2</i>.  It would cause no end of trouble:  We can't <em>all</em> be <a href="http://bioshock.wikia.com/wiki/Buck\_Raleigh" title="wikia.com" rel="nofollow">Buck Raleigh</a> [wikia.com] now, can we?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can only hope this sort of thing is not planned to be incorporated into the multiplayer feature of Bioshock 2 .
It would cause no end of trouble : We ca n't all be Buck Raleigh [ wikia.com ] now , can we ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can only hope this sort of thing is not planned to be incorporated into the multiplayer feature of Bioshock 2.
It would cause no end of trouble:  We can't all be Buck Raleigh [wikia.com] now, can we?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492830</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that what you actually wanted to spell is "HIPPA" - "Health Insurance Privacy and Portability Act".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that what you actually wanted to spell is " HIPPA " - " Health Insurance Privacy and Portability Act " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that what you actually wanted to spell is "HIPPA" - "Health Insurance Privacy and Portability Act".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492490</id>
	<title>FINALLY</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..., intelligence quotient...</p><p>Does this mean I can finally play an online game without hearing prepubescent, homophobic brats calling eachother fags?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level , ... , intelligence quotient...Does this mean I can finally play an online game without hearing prepubescent , homophobic brats calling eachother fags ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level, ..., intelligence quotient...Does this mean I can finally play an online game without hearing prepubescent, homophobic brats calling eachother fags?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494840</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261139580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is lots of discrimination in turkey.  Some people will only eat the white meat and some will only eat the dark.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is lots of discrimination in turkey .
Some people will only eat the white meat and some will only eat the dark .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is lots of discrimination in turkey.
Some people will only eat the white meat and some will only eat the dark.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491944</id>
	<title>NOOO</title>
	<author>Mekkah</author>
	<datestamp>1261169400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>NO SMOKING NEAR MY XBOX 720!  You will void the warranty with their built in smoke detector!</htmltext>
<tokenext>NO SMOKING NEAR MY XBOX 720 !
You will void the warranty with their built in smoke detector !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NO SMOKING NEAR MY XBOX 720!
You will void the warranty with their built in smoke detector!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496462</id>
	<title>Aspect Ratio</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1261156740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just change the aspect ratio of your screen such that your avatar is now normal and everybody else is a bean pole.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just change the aspect ratio of your screen such that your avatar is now normal and everybody else is a bean pole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just change the aspect ratio of your screen such that your avatar is now normal and everybody else is a bean pole.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497312</id>
	<title>Fat kids can't hide...</title>
	<author>Crummosh</author>
	<datestamp>1261215600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... and they lag irl</htmltext>
<tokenext>... and they lag irl</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and they lag irl</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494070</id>
	<title>Real benefits?</title>
	<author>Arterion</author>
	<datestamp>1261135260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe I'm confused, but aren't the real-world benefits of exercise and fitness way better than any a game could offer?  I mean, if you can't entice someone with feeling great, longer life, and getting laid a lot, do you really think you can entice them with pixels on a screen?  Really?  I mean, I love me some video games, but... really?</p><p>I think there is an aversion of activity that exceeds the rewards of it.  Adding more rewards isn't really going to help, because the current rewards are, well, just amazing.  I mean, it doesn't get much better than being hot, being healthier, and long life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I 'm confused , but are n't the real-world benefits of exercise and fitness way better than any a game could offer ?
I mean , if you ca n't entice someone with feeling great , longer life , and getting laid a lot , do you really think you can entice them with pixels on a screen ?
Really ? I mean , I love me some video games , but... really ? I think there is an aversion of activity that exceeds the rewards of it .
Adding more rewards is n't really going to help , because the current rewards are , well , just amazing .
I mean , it does n't get much better than being hot , being healthier , and long life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I'm confused, but aren't the real-world benefits of exercise and fitness way better than any a game could offer?
I mean, if you can't entice someone with feeling great, longer life, and getting laid a lot, do you really think you can entice them with pixels on a screen?
Really?  I mean, I love me some video games, but... really?I think there is an aversion of activity that exceeds the rewards of it.
Adding more rewards isn't really going to help, because the current rewards are, well, just amazing.
I mean, it doesn't get much better than being hot, being healthier, and long life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494038</id>
	<title>I can't wait</title>
	<author>gothzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1261135080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to see Stephen Hawking's avatar. I wonder if he gets a free mount.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to see Stephen Hawking 's avatar .
I wonder if he gets a free mount .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to see Stephen Hawking's avatar.
I wonder if he gets a free mount.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492238</id>
	<title>Re:It's a Free Market</title>
	<author>Smivs</author>
	<datestamp>1261127220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
As a Linux user, does this mean I have to have a penguin-like avatar?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a Linux user , does this mean I have to have a penguin-like avatar ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
As a Linux user, does this mean I have to have a penguin-like avatar?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493476</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261132020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>thats ok. the reason you don't see any fat people is because turkey is under shreya law being a islamic country. you just kill the people you don't like or that dosen't have the same relegion as you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>thats ok. the reason you do n't see any fat people is because turkey is under shreya law being a islamic country .
you just kill the people you do n't like or that dose n't have the same relegion as you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thats ok. the reason you don't see any fat people is because turkey is under shreya law being a islamic country.
you just kill the people you don't like or that dosen't have the same relegion as you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492318</id>
	<title>Wii Fit</title>
	<author>chasisaac</author>
	<datestamp>1261127520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does not Wii Fit already do this? <p>
Another way to make life suck even more. I bet this is a deal with the new health care system to make more people kill themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does not Wii Fit already do this ?
Another way to make life suck even more .
I bet this is a deal with the new health care system to make more people kill themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does not Wii Fit already do this?
Another way to make life suck even more.
I bet this is a deal with the new health care system to make more people kill themselves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492180</id>
	<title>Put down the Whoopee Pie and back away slowly</title>
	<author>AmazingChicken</author>
	<datestamp>1261127100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great Thanks micro$oft for making my life suck more.

Oh, wait.  I can't afford your game hardware anyway.  You fail.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great Thanks micro $ oft for making my life suck more .
Oh , wait .
I ca n't afford your game hardware anyway .
You fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great Thanks micro$oft for making my life suck more.
Oh, wait.
I can't afford your game hardware anyway.
You fail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491968</id>
	<title>Re:Patent Office</title>
	<author>Nadaka</author>
	<datestamp>1261169520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thats right. Nothing says progress like granting a extortionate monopoly on a drug that could save millions, if only they could afford it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats right .
Nothing says progress like granting a extortionate monopoly on a drug that could save millions , if only they could afford it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats right.
Nothing says progress like granting a extortionate monopoly on a drug that could save millions, if only they could afford it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492224</id>
	<title>limiting much?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>\_In this great People's Republic of China,we seek to control games in order to keep our youth healthy mentally and physically) Oh yeah, China is definitely gonna want this for their youth</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>\ _In this great People 's Republic of China,we seek to control games in order to keep our youth healthy mentally and physically ) Oh yeah , China is definitely gon na want this for their youth</tokentext>
<sentencetext>\_In this great People's Republic of China,we seek to control games in order to keep our youth healthy mentally and physically) Oh yeah, China is definitely gonna want this for their youth</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492042</id>
	<title>Does it visualize cranial-rectum inversions?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What an intriguing way to wipe out virtually all computer/console gaming by your own company!<br>I had never thought that anyone would patent business suicide.<br>Way to go Microsoft!<br><br>Can't wait to see Balmers avatar running around with his head stuck up his backside, that's going to be a total roflmao moment.<br>I promise to take screenshots.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What an intriguing way to wipe out virtually all computer/console gaming by your own company ! I had never thought that anyone would patent business suicide.Way to go Microsoft ! Ca n't wait to see Balmers avatar running around with his head stuck up his backside , that 's going to be a total roflmao moment.I promise to take screenshots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What an intriguing way to wipe out virtually all computer/console gaming by your own company!I had never thought that anyone would patent business suicide.Way to go Microsoft!Can't wait to see Balmers avatar running around with his head stuck up his backside, that's going to be a total roflmao moment.I promise to take screenshots.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492386</id>
	<title>That's pathetic</title>
	<author>name\_already\_taken</author>
	<datestamp>1261127700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> If you shame them in their one place to escape, they'll turn to another place to escape such as reading sci-fi.</p></div><p>The horror!  Not sci-fi!  (btw... it's spelled syfy now).</p><p>Won't somebody think of the children?!?!  The rotund, wheezing, waddling children.</p><p>I'm surprised they can manage to turn somewhere at all.  At least in the olden days kids had to walk to the library or bookstore, so sci-fi reading had an exercise component.</p><p>How many people can find pleasure only in gaming?  It just doesn't seem plausible.  At least when puberty comes along there's another thing they can do by themselves that's a lot more fun.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you shame them in their one place to escape , they 'll turn to another place to escape such as reading sci-fi.The horror !
Not sci-fi !
( btw... it 's spelled syfy now ) .Wo n't somebody think of the children ? ! ? !
The rotund , wheezing , waddling children.I 'm surprised they can manage to turn somewhere at all .
At least in the olden days kids had to walk to the library or bookstore , so sci-fi reading had an exercise component.How many people can find pleasure only in gaming ?
It just does n't seem plausible .
At least when puberty comes along there 's another thing they can do by themselves that 's a lot more fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> If you shame them in their one place to escape, they'll turn to another place to escape such as reading sci-fi.The horror!
Not sci-fi!
(btw... it's spelled syfy now).Won't somebody think of the children?!?!
The rotund, wheezing, waddling children.I'm surprised they can manage to turn somewhere at all.
At least in the olden days kids had to walk to the library or bookstore, so sci-fi reading had an exercise component.How many people can find pleasure only in gaming?
It just doesn't seem plausible.
At least when puberty comes along there's another thing they can do by themselves that's a lot more fun.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493246</id>
	<title>Rage against the (M)achine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261131180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't quite express the shock and bile that this article literally provoked with me.  I have a reason or two to be invested in this, though I'd love to think that I would be anyways.  I'm both a fat chick, and disabled.  The one easily has been associated with the other.  Among some of my medical issues, I have several neuromuscular diseases that have resulted in partial paralysis with repetitive motion(such as walking, or any other 'continued' type motion, including brushing my own hair).  My legs and arms routinely gimp out.  I'm in a wheelchair if it's more than a very few steps.  I need lots of help with my routine life.  I'm also in severe neuropathic and musculoskeletal pain, due to nerve damage, chronic muscle spasms, spinal degeneration, et al.  I only preface my rant with all of this in order to prove a point relevant to this topic:</p><p>I have spent copious amounts of time online in various MMORPGs, from the very inception of Everquest, to the beginning of WoW, and have tried most of them in between, including the mostly 'social' ones.  I have learned the game mechanics, as much as I'm able, and have participated socially, as much as I've been so inclined, at various times in my life (It's funny how that's decreased drastically in increments from EQ to WoW), and I have paid into the economy with the subscription fee associated with each.  I have not, at any time, been an MMO addict, in that a pixelated game could ever interfere with my perception of 'real life', and its priorities.</p><p>I have, however, used these games as a form of escapism from my pain and discomfort.  To say otherwise would be a blatant understatement of the facts, and why?  I don't see using an MMO, either one of the more strategic 'hack 'n slash' fantasy or sci-fi types (WoW, AO, Runescape, Eve Online) or a social (Sims Online, There, or Second Life) venue as being an unhealthy coping mechanism for a disabled person.  We often spend so much of our time in a house, trapped inside of bodies that don't work, or are screaming silently with pain.  To be able to thrive, leap, dance, run, and maybe kick some butt in a pixelated body is liberating.  Never mind the opportunity to interact socially, unhindered, in the aesthetic form of our choosing, because isn't that what we -all- like to do?</p><p>What this all essentially means is:  Microsoft wants to nerf handicapped people.</p><p>I'm barely going to get into the fact that Microsoft has alluded to the fact that they want to dig into my socioeconomic and medical data, because that both defies belief and insults my intelligence on a level to a degree that I truly believe they'll be reamed by people much bigger and badder than I am.  (And I mean that on a less than literal level to any smart asses out there.  =P )</p><p>I'm going to imagine, for a moment, that I actually had the motor skills to play CoD6 with my best guy friend and his cool crew, Team Drunky.  *Team Drunky moves in to engage the enemy with a tactical strike, having decided against the comedic, but less effective death-via-precision-supply-drop.  A skirmish begins.  Ferret likewise is out the gate, sniping at the opposing clan, but glances over his shoulder, unfortunately, at Nixon, who is slovenly shuffling in his general direction, in a cold sweat, upper body graced with an ill fitting flak jacket, an M16, that she cannot lift, sparking as it drags along the pavement.  Ferret groans inwardly as he faces the dilemma of whether to join Team Drunky, and live, or whether to try and save his soon-to-be and as-good-as-dead friend, whose right leg has now completely ceased to work.  "Save yourself, you idiot!  This is completely fruitless!"  Nixon yells, right before catching one dead between the eyes.  Sadly, Ferret was relieved.  Team Drunky was relieved.  The opposing team was sorta relieved.</p><p>Apparently Microsoft and America were relieved, because another fat person was kept off the net... back into the obscurity of their dark living rooms, in front of the television... where they belong... or something.</p><p>I've often</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't quite express the shock and bile that this article literally provoked with me .
I have a reason or two to be invested in this , though I 'd love to think that I would be anyways .
I 'm both a fat chick , and disabled .
The one easily has been associated with the other .
Among some of my medical issues , I have several neuromuscular diseases that have resulted in partial paralysis with repetitive motion ( such as walking , or any other 'continued ' type motion , including brushing my own hair ) .
My legs and arms routinely gimp out .
I 'm in a wheelchair if it 's more than a very few steps .
I need lots of help with my routine life .
I 'm also in severe neuropathic and musculoskeletal pain , due to nerve damage , chronic muscle spasms , spinal degeneration , et al .
I only preface my rant with all of this in order to prove a point relevant to this topic : I have spent copious amounts of time online in various MMORPGs , from the very inception of Everquest , to the beginning of WoW , and have tried most of them in between , including the mostly 'social ' ones .
I have learned the game mechanics , as much as I 'm able , and have participated socially , as much as I 've been so inclined , at various times in my life ( It 's funny how that 's decreased drastically in increments from EQ to WoW ) , and I have paid into the economy with the subscription fee associated with each .
I have not , at any time , been an MMO addict , in that a pixelated game could ever interfere with my perception of 'real life ' , and its priorities.I have , however , used these games as a form of escapism from my pain and discomfort .
To say otherwise would be a blatant understatement of the facts , and why ?
I do n't see using an MMO , either one of the more strategic 'hack 'n slash ' fantasy or sci-fi types ( WoW , AO , Runescape , Eve Online ) or a social ( Sims Online , There , or Second Life ) venue as being an unhealthy coping mechanism for a disabled person .
We often spend so much of our time in a house , trapped inside of bodies that do n't work , or are screaming silently with pain .
To be able to thrive , leap , dance , run , and maybe kick some butt in a pixelated body is liberating .
Never mind the opportunity to interact socially , unhindered , in the aesthetic form of our choosing , because is n't that what we -all- like to do ? What this all essentially means is : Microsoft wants to nerf handicapped people.I 'm barely going to get into the fact that Microsoft has alluded to the fact that they want to dig into my socioeconomic and medical data , because that both defies belief and insults my intelligence on a level to a degree that I truly believe they 'll be reamed by people much bigger and badder than I am .
( And I mean that on a less than literal level to any smart asses out there .
= P ) I 'm going to imagine , for a moment , that I actually had the motor skills to play CoD6 with my best guy friend and his cool crew , Team Drunky .
* Team Drunky moves in to engage the enemy with a tactical strike , having decided against the comedic , but less effective death-via-precision-supply-drop .
A skirmish begins .
Ferret likewise is out the gate , sniping at the opposing clan , but glances over his shoulder , unfortunately , at Nixon , who is slovenly shuffling in his general direction , in a cold sweat , upper body graced with an ill fitting flak jacket , an M16 , that she can not lift , sparking as it drags along the pavement .
Ferret groans inwardly as he faces the dilemma of whether to join Team Drunky , and live , or whether to try and save his soon-to-be and as-good-as-dead friend , whose right leg has now completely ceased to work .
" Save yourself , you idiot !
This is completely fruitless !
" Nixon yells , right before catching one dead between the eyes .
Sadly , Ferret was relieved .
Team Drunky was relieved .
The opposing team was sorta relieved.Apparently Microsoft and America were relieved , because another fat person was kept off the net... back into the obscurity of their dark living rooms , in front of the television... where they belong... or something.I 've often</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't quite express the shock and bile that this article literally provoked with me.
I have a reason or two to be invested in this, though I'd love to think that I would be anyways.
I'm both a fat chick, and disabled.
The one easily has been associated with the other.
Among some of my medical issues, I have several neuromuscular diseases that have resulted in partial paralysis with repetitive motion(such as walking, or any other 'continued' type motion, including brushing my own hair).
My legs and arms routinely gimp out.
I'm in a wheelchair if it's more than a very few steps.
I need lots of help with my routine life.
I'm also in severe neuropathic and musculoskeletal pain, due to nerve damage, chronic muscle spasms, spinal degeneration, et al.
I only preface my rant with all of this in order to prove a point relevant to this topic:I have spent copious amounts of time online in various MMORPGs, from the very inception of Everquest, to the beginning of WoW, and have tried most of them in between, including the mostly 'social' ones.
I have learned the game mechanics, as much as I'm able, and have participated socially, as much as I've been so inclined, at various times in my life (It's funny how that's decreased drastically in increments from EQ to WoW), and I have paid into the economy with the subscription fee associated with each.
I have not, at any time, been an MMO addict, in that a pixelated game could ever interfere with my perception of 'real life', and its priorities.I have, however, used these games as a form of escapism from my pain and discomfort.
To say otherwise would be a blatant understatement of the facts, and why?
I don't see using an MMO, either one of the more strategic 'hack 'n slash' fantasy or sci-fi types (WoW, AO, Runescape, Eve Online) or a social (Sims Online, There, or Second Life) venue as being an unhealthy coping mechanism for a disabled person.
We often spend so much of our time in a house, trapped inside of bodies that don't work, or are screaming silently with pain.
To be able to thrive, leap, dance, run, and maybe kick some butt in a pixelated body is liberating.
Never mind the opportunity to interact socially, unhindered, in the aesthetic form of our choosing, because isn't that what we -all- like to do?What this all essentially means is:  Microsoft wants to nerf handicapped people.I'm barely going to get into the fact that Microsoft has alluded to the fact that they want to dig into my socioeconomic and medical data, because that both defies belief and insults my intelligence on a level to a degree that I truly believe they'll be reamed by people much bigger and badder than I am.
(And I mean that on a less than literal level to any smart asses out there.
=P )I'm going to imagine, for a moment, that I actually had the motor skills to play CoD6 with my best guy friend and his cool crew, Team Drunky.
*Team Drunky moves in to engage the enemy with a tactical strike, having decided against the comedic, but less effective death-via-precision-supply-drop.
A skirmish begins.
Ferret likewise is out the gate, sniping at the opposing clan, but glances over his shoulder, unfortunately, at Nixon, who is slovenly shuffling in his general direction, in a cold sweat, upper body graced with an ill fitting flak jacket, an M16, that she cannot lift, sparking as it drags along the pavement.
Ferret groans inwardly as he faces the dilemma of whether to join Team Drunky, and live, or whether to try and save his soon-to-be and as-good-as-dead friend, whose right leg has now completely ceased to work.
"Save yourself, you idiot!
This is completely fruitless!
"  Nixon yells, right before catching one dead between the eyes.
Sadly, Ferret was relieved.
Team Drunky was relieved.
The opposing team was sorta relieved.Apparently Microsoft and America were relieved, because another fat person was kept off the net... back into the obscurity of their dark living rooms, in front of the television... where they belong... or something.I've often</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491706</id>
	<title>Brilliant</title>
	<author>tsotha</author>
	<datestamp>1261168620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Brilliant idea.  Take people who don't measure up to everyone's expectations, and heap shame on them in the one place where they can take a break from it all.  Microsoft should also file for a patent on a method to lose money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Brilliant idea .
Take people who do n't measure up to everyone 's expectations , and heap shame on them in the one place where they can take a break from it all .
Microsoft should also file for a patent on a method to lose money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brilliant idea.
Take people who don't measure up to everyone's expectations, and heap shame on them in the one place where they can take a break from it all.
Microsoft should also file for a patent on a method to lose money.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497322</id>
	<title>outing gay players via their 'demographics'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261216080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>something like this would never happen.  also, if it uses personal demographics, it could 'out' GLBTQ players, or you could have a situation where a transgendered person can't play as the character they identify as, or some other ridiculous situation.  or simple typos that are so pervasive in bureaucratic record systems could lead to embarrassing or annoying 'errors' in your avatar.<br>seriously though, something like this would just never happen, and if they tried, it would fail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>something like this would never happen .
also , if it uses personal demographics , it could 'out ' GLBTQ players , or you could have a situation where a transgendered person ca n't play as the character they identify as , or some other ridiculous situation .
or simple typos that are so pervasive in bureaucratic record systems could lead to embarrassing or annoying 'errors ' in your avatar.seriously though , something like this would just never happen , and if they tried , it would fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>something like this would never happen.
also, if it uses personal demographics, it could 'out' GLBTQ players, or you could have a situation where a transgendered person can't play as the character they identify as, or some other ridiculous situation.
or simple typos that are so pervasive in bureaucratic record systems could lead to embarrassing or annoying 'errors' in your avatar.seriously though, something like this would just never happen, and if they tried, it would fail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</id>
	<title>Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you and your obsessions. fat people are not discriminated against or humiliated in any way in my country. the country is turkey. and i have never yet seen any other country nearby, leave aside any european countries in which overweight people were ridiculed, belittled, bullied or discriminated against in any respect.</p><p>i very much have the idea that you people are so obsessed with your own socioeconomical circumstances, and so many bullshit propaganda being fed into you that you fail to see a world outside yours with different ideas and inclinations exist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you and your obsessions .
fat people are not discriminated against or humiliated in any way in my country .
the country is turkey .
and i have never yet seen any other country nearby , leave aside any european countries in which overweight people were ridiculed , belittled , bullied or discriminated against in any respect.i very much have the idea that you people are so obsessed with your own socioeconomical circumstances , and so many bullshit propaganda being fed into you that you fail to see a world outside yours with different ideas and inclinations exist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you and your obsessions.
fat people are not discriminated against or humiliated in any way in my country.
the country is turkey.
and i have never yet seen any other country nearby, leave aside any european countries in which overweight people were ridiculed, belittled, bullied or discriminated against in any respect.i very much have the idea that you people are so obsessed with your own socioeconomical circumstances, and so many bullshit propaganda being fed into you that you fail to see a world outside yours with different ideas and inclinations exist.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492864</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fat people are not discriminated against in turkey? Then maybe Armenians, Kurds and Orthodox Christians among others should gain some weight...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fat people are not discriminated against in turkey ?
Then maybe Armenians , Kurds and Orthodox Christians among others should gain some weight.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fat people are not discriminated against in turkey?
Then maybe Armenians, Kurds and Orthodox Christians among others should gain some weight...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493394</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>L3370</author>
	<datestamp>1261131720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Try not to let your nationalist pride get in the way with the facts.<br>
Fat people are not discriminated at all? I wouldn't say that's 100 percent true. I have lived in your country for a few years, and while it may not be a big issue culturally, I did see some make fun of fat people.<br> <br>
Besides, your country has more important people to discriminate against. Kurds, Armenians, Gypsies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try not to let your nationalist pride get in the way with the facts .
Fat people are not discriminated at all ?
I would n't say that 's 100 percent true .
I have lived in your country for a few years , and while it may not be a big issue culturally , I did see some make fun of fat people .
Besides , your country has more important people to discriminate against .
Kurds , Armenians , Gypsies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try not to let your nationalist pride get in the way with the facts.
Fat people are not discriminated at all?
I wouldn't say that's 100 percent true.
I have lived in your country for a few years, and while it may not be a big issue culturally, I did see some make fun of fat people.
Besides, your country has more important people to discriminate against.
Kurds, Armenians, Gypsies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491854</id>
	<title>The point of gaming</title>
	<author>vldragon</author>
	<datestamp>1261169100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I though one of the main point of gaming was to take you out of reality and become someone or something differant.  I doubt this would ever be used in game, and if is i don't think it will sell very well.

Maybe they just wan't to patent it to keep other from doing it?  I don't the employess of MS are any more fit than your average gamer anyway...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I though one of the main point of gaming was to take you out of reality and become someone or something differant .
I doubt this would ever be used in game , and if is i do n't think it will sell very well .
Maybe they just wa n't to patent it to keep other from doing it ?
I do n't the employess of MS are any more fit than your average gamer anyway.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I though one of the main point of gaming was to take you out of reality and become someone or something differant.
I doubt this would ever be used in game, and if is i don't think it will sell very well.
Maybe they just wan't to patent it to keep other from doing it?
I don't the employess of MS are any more fit than your average gamer anyway...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495014</id>
	<title>Re:From TFA:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261140840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They dont mean to get your medical records, just find out how often you order domino's to your house.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They dont mean to get your medical records , just find out how often you order domino 's to your house .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They dont mean to get your medical records, just find out how often you order domino's to your house.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494700</id>
	<title>There are uses</title>
	<author>Antique Geekmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1261138620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Detecting the FBI agent pretending to be a 13 year old girl could be useful, for many reasons. But despite the stupidity of such an easily fooled system for general use, there is a legitimate use: physical therapy with Wii-like or Dance-Dance Revolution like components, designed to measure progress in a genuine fitness program.</p><p>And for related entertainment, there is the video "Do You Want To Date My Avatar?" at <a href="http://www.watchtheguild.com/the-guild/the-guild-music-video/" title="watchtheguild.com">http://www.watchtheguild.com/the-guild/the-guild-music-video/</a> [watchtheguild.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Detecting the FBI agent pretending to be a 13 year old girl could be useful , for many reasons .
But despite the stupidity of such an easily fooled system for general use , there is a legitimate use : physical therapy with Wii-like or Dance-Dance Revolution like components , designed to measure progress in a genuine fitness program.And for related entertainment , there is the video " Do You Want To Date My Avatar ?
" at http : //www.watchtheguild.com/the-guild/the-guild-music-video/ [ watchtheguild.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Detecting the FBI agent pretending to be a 13 year old girl could be useful, for many reasons.
But despite the stupidity of such an easily fooled system for general use, there is a legitimate use: physical therapy with Wii-like or Dance-Dance Revolution like components, designed to measure progress in a genuine fitness program.And for related entertainment, there is the video "Do You Want To Date My Avatar?
" at http://www.watchtheguild.com/the-guild/the-guild-music-video/ [watchtheguild.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497422</id>
	<title>No more anonymity: thanks M$!</title>
	<author>Randym</author>
	<datestamp>1261218120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>A physical characteristic is accessed that has been <b>nonvolitionally</b> obtained from a user, avoiding the inconvenience or unaccountability of voluntarily supplied information.</i> </p><p>This is so<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... wrong<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. that it is hard to know where to start criticizing it.  At first I thought it was an April Fool's joke a little too early, but then I clicked through to the patent itself.  As a work of brilliant satire poking fun at the whole patenting process, it succeeds -- too bad it's <b>for real</b>!  Anyway, here I go: </p><p>1) M$ will obtain your data <i>nonvolitionally</i> -- to wit, <b>without your consent</b>!  Leaving aside the obvious Constitutional implications of this (5th Amendment violation, for those keeping score), it raises the interesting question: where is this data going to come from? (And: can the source be spoofed?)</p><p>2) More ominously, note the following claims:<br>

[0024]It should be appreciated with the benefit of the present disclosure that the physical characteristics that can be conveyed include can include health information pertinent to performance such as blood pressure, heart rate, pulmonary flow rate, weight, body fat index, strength, blood glucose level. These physical characteristics can be chronic conditions such as allergies, disabilities, diseases, etc., that facilitate locating people of similar sensitivities, lifestyle and background.<br>

[0025]In addition, the physical characteristics can include psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc. Such information can be useful in enhancing social interaction as well as adjusting how an avatar performs in a competitive virtual environment. </p><p>Needless to say, such 'physical characteristics' provide a fertile ground for discrimination.  For example, imagine the following:</p><p>You have been <i>denied</i> access to <b>Fourth Reich</b> because you are a Jewish scum.  Your internet address has been logged; your home address has been located; a squad of Storm Troopers will be by shortly to teach you a lesson in respect.</p><p>3) No more anonymity.  Under this system, Publius -- the collective identity of the Founding Fathers when they were attempting to convince their fellow citizens of the necessity of a new form of government -- would have been ferreted out and they would all have been tossed into British gaols to await their trials for treason.</p><p>And let's not forget M$s ultimate goal: </p><p>NON-WINDOWS SYSTEM DETECTED. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A physical characteristic is accessed that has been nonvolitionally obtained from a user , avoiding the inconvenience or unaccountability of voluntarily supplied information .
This is so ... wrong .. that it is hard to know where to start criticizing it .
At first I thought it was an April Fool 's joke a little too early , but then I clicked through to the patent itself .
As a work of brilliant satire poking fun at the whole patenting process , it succeeds -- too bad it 's for real !
Anyway , here I go : 1 ) M $ will obtain your data nonvolitionally -- to wit , without your consent !
Leaving aside the obvious Constitutional implications of this ( 5th Amendment violation , for those keeping score ) , it raises the interesting question : where is this data going to come from ?
( And : can the source be spoofed ?
) 2 ) More ominously , note the following claims : [ 0024 ] It should be appreciated with the benefit of the present disclosure that the physical characteristics that can be conveyed include can include health information pertinent to performance such as blood pressure , heart rate , pulmonary flow rate , weight , body fat index , strength , blood glucose level .
These physical characteristics can be chronic conditions such as allergies , disabilities , diseases , etc. , that facilitate locating people of similar sensitivities , lifestyle and background .
[ 0025 ] In addition , the physical characteristics can include psychological and demographic information such as education level , geographic location , age , sex , intelligence quotient , socioeconomic class , occupation , marital/relationship status , religious belief , political affiliation , etc .
Such information can be useful in enhancing social interaction as well as adjusting how an avatar performs in a competitive virtual environment .
Needless to say , such 'physical characteristics ' provide a fertile ground for discrimination .
For example , imagine the following : You have been denied access to Fourth Reich because you are a Jewish scum .
Your internet address has been logged ; your home address has been located ; a squad of Storm Troopers will be by shortly to teach you a lesson in respect.3 ) No more anonymity .
Under this system , Publius -- the collective identity of the Founding Fathers when they were attempting to convince their fellow citizens of the necessity of a new form of government -- would have been ferreted out and they would all have been tossed into British gaols to await their trials for treason.And let 's not forget M $ s ultimate goal : NON-WINDOWS SYSTEM DETECTED .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> A physical characteristic is accessed that has been nonvolitionally obtained from a user, avoiding the inconvenience or unaccountability of voluntarily supplied information.
This is so ... wrong .. that it is hard to know where to start criticizing it.
At first I thought it was an April Fool's joke a little too early, but then I clicked through to the patent itself.
As a work of brilliant satire poking fun at the whole patenting process, it succeeds -- too bad it's for real!
Anyway, here I go: 1) M$ will obtain your data nonvolitionally -- to wit, without your consent!
Leaving aside the obvious Constitutional implications of this (5th Amendment violation, for those keeping score), it raises the interesting question: where is this data going to come from?
(And: can the source be spoofed?
)2) More ominously, note the following claims:

[0024]It should be appreciated with the benefit of the present disclosure that the physical characteristics that can be conveyed include can include health information pertinent to performance such as blood pressure, heart rate, pulmonary flow rate, weight, body fat index, strength, blood glucose level.
These physical characteristics can be chronic conditions such as allergies, disabilities, diseases, etc., that facilitate locating people of similar sensitivities, lifestyle and background.
[0025]In addition, the physical characteristics can include psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc.
Such information can be useful in enhancing social interaction as well as adjusting how an avatar performs in a competitive virtual environment.
Needless to say, such 'physical characteristics' provide a fertile ground for discrimination.
For example, imagine the following:You have been denied access to Fourth Reich because you are a Jewish scum.
Your internet address has been logged; your home address has been located; a squad of Storm Troopers will be by shortly to teach you a lesson in respect.3) No more anonymity.
Under this system, Publius -- the collective identity of the Founding Fathers when they were attempting to convince their fellow citizens of the necessity of a new form of government -- would have been ferreted out and they would all have been tossed into British gaols to await their trials for treason.And let's not forget M$s ultimate goal: NON-WINDOWS SYSTEM DETECTED. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30498604</id>
	<title>Aha!</title>
	<author>GrubLord</author>
	<datestamp>1261239840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally, a use for my PhD!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , a use for my PhD !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, a use for my PhD!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493086</id>
	<title>Nice going there</title>
	<author>Minwee</author>
	<datestamp>1261130460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So... will Microsoft be making a big donation to <a href="http://www.childsplaycharity.org/" title="childsplaycharity.org">Child's Play</a> [childsplaycharity.org] any time soon?
</p><p> <em>"This new X Box won't let me play today because it thinks I should get out of bed and do more exercise.  It suggests half an hour of jogging.  How many weeks did you say it be before I can walk again?"</em></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So... will Microsoft be making a big donation to Child 's Play [ childsplaycharity.org ] any time soon ?
" This new X Box wo n't let me play today because it thinks I should get out of bed and do more exercise .
It suggests half an hour of jogging .
How many weeks did you say it be before I can walk again ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So... will Microsoft be making a big donation to Child's Play [childsplaycharity.org] any time soon?
"This new X Box won't let me play today because it thinks I should get out of bed and do more exercise.
It suggests half an hour of jogging.
How many weeks did you say it be before I can walk again?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30518176</id>
	<title>Re:WTF???</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1261397640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, where else?  The obvious way that everyone seems to be missing is by using Natal to scan your body in and use that for the avatar.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , where else ?
The obvious way that everyone seems to be missing is by using Natal to scan your body in and use that for the avatar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, where else?
The obvious way that everyone seems to be missing is by using Natal to scan your body in and use that for the avatar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492738</id>
	<title>Butter Overflow Error</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1261129080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You computer will now display the Blueberry Ice Cream of Death.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You computer will now display the Blueberry Ice Cream of Death.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You computer will now display the Blueberry Ice Cream of Death.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492142</id>
	<title>pear shaped blobs abound</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261126920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just hope they don't make all us heavy people look like pear shaped blobs.</p><p>
&nbsp; Musculature and bone structure should be taken into account. Otherwise most professional wrestlers would look like the people inn Wall-e. I know my wii fit avatar looks nothing like me since while I am overweight, but I am also muscularly fit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just hope they do n't make all us heavy people look like pear shaped blobs .
  Musculature and bone structure should be taken into account .
Otherwise most professional wrestlers would look like the people inn Wall-e. I know my wii fit avatar looks nothing like me since while I am overweight , but I am also muscularly fit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just hope they don't make all us heavy people look like pear shaped blobs.
  Musculature and bone structure should be taken into account.
Otherwise most professional wrestlers would look like the people inn Wall-e. I know my wii fit avatar looks nothing like me since while I am overweight, but I am also muscularly fit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493664</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>Sentrion</author>
	<datestamp>1261132980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>you and your obsessions. fat people are not discriminated against or humiliated in any way in my country. the country is turkey...</p></div><p>Fat people are not discriminated against in a country named after a delicious fat edible bird.  Oh the irony!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>you and your obsessions .
fat people are not discriminated against or humiliated in any way in my country .
the country is turkey...Fat people are not discriminated against in a country named after a delicious fat edible bird .
Oh the irony !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you and your obsessions.
fat people are not discriminated against or humiliated in any way in my country.
the country is turkey...Fat people are not discriminated against in a country named after a delicious fat edible bird.
Oh the irony!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497296</id>
	<title>Kind of like it, but...</title>
	<author>Stepnsteph</author>
	<datestamp>1261214760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I kind of like the idea of having an avatar that's similar to me.  Weight, muscle, general appearance, and how the world could affect the avatar are all interesting idea.</p><p>The patent also mentions pedometers and similar tools.  Wii Fit was a start, but a system such as this one could encourage real-world exercising in order to see changes in your avatar and even to receive certain Achievements.  Now those would be some achievements to show off.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  The game could theoretically guide the person toward a healthy amount of weight loss, which is monitored by the tools (eg; a Wii Fit board rip off, a pedometer, and so on).  This is an ideal situation that assumes that no cheating is taking place.</p><p>I could see such a game asking about asthma (or the like), but it clearly goes too far when talking about pulling in medical records.  There are some obvious reasons for considerable concern, but there is also some interesting potential here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I kind of like the idea of having an avatar that 's similar to me .
Weight , muscle , general appearance , and how the world could affect the avatar are all interesting idea.The patent also mentions pedometers and similar tools .
Wii Fit was a start , but a system such as this one could encourage real-world exercising in order to see changes in your avatar and even to receive certain Achievements .
Now those would be some achievements to show off .
: ) The game could theoretically guide the person toward a healthy amount of weight loss , which is monitored by the tools ( eg ; a Wii Fit board rip off , a pedometer , and so on ) .
This is an ideal situation that assumes that no cheating is taking place.I could see such a game asking about asthma ( or the like ) , but it clearly goes too far when talking about pulling in medical records .
There are some obvious reasons for considerable concern , but there is also some interesting potential here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I kind of like the idea of having an avatar that's similar to me.
Weight, muscle, general appearance, and how the world could affect the avatar are all interesting idea.The patent also mentions pedometers and similar tools.
Wii Fit was a start, but a system such as this one could encourage real-world exercising in order to see changes in your avatar and even to receive certain Achievements.
Now those would be some achievements to show off.
:)  The game could theoretically guide the person toward a healthy amount of weight loss, which is monitored by the tools (eg; a Wii Fit board rip off, a pedometer, and so on).
This is an ideal situation that assumes that no cheating is taking place.I could see such a game asking about asthma (or the like), but it clearly goes too far when talking about pulling in medical records.
There are some obvious reasons for considerable concern, but there is also some interesting potential here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493332</id>
	<title>Re:You think this doesn't effect you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261131540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>C'mon, no one wants to admit their a big pussy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>C'mon , no one wants to admit their a big pussy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>C'mon, no one wants to admit their a big pussy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>funny you should mention that. When I read the summary my main response was something along the lines of it being impossible to implement even if the stupid patent was approved simply because:</p><p>NO GOD DAMNED GAME COMPANY SHOULD BE ABLE TO ACCESS YOUR FUCKING MEDICAL RECORDS TO FUCK WITH YOUR GAMING TO BEGIN WITH. (For ANY reason really.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>funny you should mention that .
When I read the summary my main response was something along the lines of it being impossible to implement even if the stupid patent was approved simply because : NO GOD DAMNED GAME COMPANY SHOULD BE ABLE TO ACCESS YOUR FUCKING MEDICAL RECORDS TO FUCK WITH YOUR GAMING TO BEGIN WITH .
( For ANY reason really .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>funny you should mention that.
When I read the summary my main response was something along the lines of it being impossible to implement even if the stupid patent was approved simply because:NO GOD DAMNED GAME COMPANY SHOULD BE ABLE TO ACCESS YOUR FUCKING MEDICAL RECORDS TO FUCK WITH YOUR GAMING TO BEGIN WITH.
(For ANY reason really.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492620</id>
	<title>Re:It's a Free Market</title>
	<author>Lonewolf666</author>
	<datestamp>1261128600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you have missed the news about Sony misbehaving. Like this:<br><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/it/05/10/31/2016223.shtml" title="slashdot.org">http://it.slashdot.org/it/05/10/31/2016223.shtml</a> [slashdot.org]<br>Most<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. readers were Not Amused.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you have missed the news about Sony misbehaving .
Like this : http : //it.slashdot.org/it/05/10/31/2016223.shtml [ slashdot.org ] Most / .
readers were Not Amused .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you have missed the news about Sony misbehaving.
Like this:http://it.slashdot.org/it/05/10/31/2016223.shtml [slashdot.org]Most /.
readers were Not Amused.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497124</id>
	<title>Ill pay extra if the airlines adopt this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261253580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll happily pay extra if airlines start adopting this.</p><p>I'm real tired of sitting next to a woman called "house" on my long flights.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll happily pay extra if airlines start adopting this.I 'm real tired of sitting next to a woman called " house " on my long flights .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll happily pay extra if airlines start adopting this.I'm real tired of sitting next to a woman called "house" on my long flights.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493356</id>
	<title>Re:And presumably all this will be done....</title>
	<author>Vexorian</author>
	<datestamp>1261131600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>bleh who's the retard who modded this old news insightful? Besides, it is not like the OP mentioned Linux... regardless, even if the Linux kernel is  bloated by Linus' standards, it is by far much, much lighter than the windows one. You wouldn't run windows in an ipod... and the only think preventing the linux kernel to run on ipods nowadays is the new encrypted firmware... Even if the Linux kernel was bloated. Your average Linux distro - even ubuntu - is magnitudes less bloated than windows. Heck, I can run latest version of ubuntu just fine with 512 MB of RAM and no swap... Good luck fitting even windows 7 on that...</htmltext>
<tokenext>bleh who 's the retard who modded this old news insightful ?
Besides , it is not like the OP mentioned Linux... regardless , even if the Linux kernel is bloated by Linus ' standards , it is by far much , much lighter than the windows one .
You would n't run windows in an ipod... and the only think preventing the linux kernel to run on ipods nowadays is the new encrypted firmware... Even if the Linux kernel was bloated .
Your average Linux distro - even ubuntu - is magnitudes less bloated than windows .
Heck , I can run latest version of ubuntu just fine with 512 MB of RAM and no swap... Good luck fitting even windows 7 on that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bleh who's the retard who modded this old news insightful?
Besides, it is not like the OP mentioned Linux... regardless, even if the Linux kernel is  bloated by Linus' standards, it is by far much, much lighter than the windows one.
You wouldn't run windows in an ipod... and the only think preventing the linux kernel to run on ipods nowadays is the new encrypted firmware... Even if the Linux kernel was bloated.
Your average Linux distro - even ubuntu - is magnitudes less bloated than windows.
Heck, I can run latest version of ubuntu just fine with 512 MB of RAM and no swap... Good luck fitting even windows 7 on that...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30512194</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1261411680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't believe that at all.  It's our lifestyle.  Restaurants give us portions that can easily fill two.<br> <br>Yeah, it would be great to think that being nice to people makes them thinner. But that is just a load of crap.  You are responsible for your own weight.  Stop making excuses.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't believe that at all .
It 's our lifestyle .
Restaurants give us portions that can easily fill two .
Yeah , it would be great to think that being nice to people makes them thinner .
But that is just a load of crap .
You are responsible for your own weight .
Stop making excuses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't believe that at all.
It's our lifestyle.
Restaurants give us portions that can easily fill two.
Yeah, it would be great to think that being nice to people makes them thinner.
But that is just a load of crap.
You are responsible for your own weight.
Stop making excuses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496858</id>
	<title>Facebook</title>
	<author>KalvinB</author>
	<datestamp>1261162560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're going to integrate Facebook Connect with XBox live so they can grab all your details.</p><p>Seriously, Facebook has everything but IQ.  Everything else you can put in there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're going to integrate Facebook Connect with XBox live so they can grab all your details.Seriously , Facebook has everything but IQ .
Everything else you can put in there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're going to integrate Facebook Connect with XBox live so they can grab all your details.Seriously, Facebook has everything but IQ.
Everything else you can put in there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492790</id>
	<title>Re:Pot, kettle, black.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've lived in Redmond a while now.  One thing is for sure:  the pedestrian crosswalk signals are NOT too short.</p><p>They are fantastically, annoyingly long.  A person in physiotherapy could make her leisurely way across the street, realize she dropped something on the other side, stumble back, get it, and cross one last time, and the hand still won't be showing.</p><p>I remember living in downtown Toronto, on Dundas street, and running as fast as I could at the instant the white "start walking" dude appeared the flashing orange hand would still arrive before I got to the other side.  There's an island in the middle of the street specifically to account for people only being able to cross half the street.  Rather than just making the lights longer.  Because we LIKE our traffic lights taking 1/5 the time as Redmond / Seattle lights.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've lived in Redmond a while now .
One thing is for sure : the pedestrian crosswalk signals are NOT too short.They are fantastically , annoyingly long .
A person in physiotherapy could make her leisurely way across the street , realize she dropped something on the other side , stumble back , get it , and cross one last time , and the hand still wo n't be showing.I remember living in downtown Toronto , on Dundas street , and running as fast as I could at the instant the white " start walking " dude appeared the flashing orange hand would still arrive before I got to the other side .
There 's an island in the middle of the street specifically to account for people only being able to cross half the street .
Rather than just making the lights longer .
Because we LIKE our traffic lights taking 1/5 the time as Redmond / Seattle lights .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've lived in Redmond a while now.
One thing is for sure:  the pedestrian crosswalk signals are NOT too short.They are fantastically, annoyingly long.
A person in physiotherapy could make her leisurely way across the street, realize she dropped something on the other side, stumble back, get it, and cross one last time, and the hand still won't be showing.I remember living in downtown Toronto, on Dundas street, and running as fast as I could at the instant the white "start walking" dude appeared the flashing orange hand would still arrive before I got to the other side.
There's an island in the middle of the street specifically to account for people only being able to cross half the street.
Rather than just making the lights longer.
Because we LIKE our traffic lights taking 1/5 the time as Redmond / Seattle lights.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492644</id>
	<title>Yeah right...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1261128660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...because the Internet is all about honesty, and they never entered anything false in all those bazillion registration forms on the net. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...because the Internet is all about honesty , and they never entered anything false in all those bazillion registration forms on the net .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...because the Internet is all about honesty, and they never entered anything false in all those bazillion registration forms on the net.
^^</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493528</id>
	<title>Re:Discrimination</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261132320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Video game access is not a constitutional right. Moreover, there is a distinction between "places of public accomodation" and private clubs. XBox Live might be considered such a club. In this case, other clubs can compete for membership, without the same restrictions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Video game access is not a constitutional right .
Moreover , there is a distinction between " places of public accomodation " and private clubs .
XBox Live might be considered such a club .
In this case , other clubs can compete for membership , without the same restrictions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Video game access is not a constitutional right.
Moreover, there is a distinction between "places of public accomodation" and private clubs.
XBox Live might be considered such a club.
In this case, other clubs can compete for membership, without the same restrictions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491884</id>
	<title>Pot, kettle, black.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I drive through the Microsoft's campus almost daily. One of the funniest things I've seen (I have a rather twisted  sense of humor) is all the Microsoft employees trying to waddle across the too short and too frequent pedestrian crosswalk signals that Redmond configured.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I drive through the Microsoft 's campus almost daily .
One of the funniest things I 've seen ( I have a rather twisted sense of humor ) is all the Microsoft employees trying to waddle across the too short and too frequent pedestrian crosswalk signals that Redmond configured .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I drive through the Microsoft's campus almost daily.
One of the funniest things I've seen (I have a rather twisted  sense of humor) is all the Microsoft employees trying to waddle across the too short and too frequent pedestrian crosswalk signals that Redmond configured.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492508</id>
	<title>Garlic, Ginseng, Mandrake Root</title>
	<author>Haber-ery</author>
	<datestamp>1261128180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Virtuous behavior? Avatars? Next thing you know Microsoft will be disabling the In Nami Ylem routines. I'm taking my Ankh and heading through the next moongate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Virtuous behavior ?
Avatars ? Next thing you know Microsoft will be disabling the In Nami Ylem routines .
I 'm taking my Ankh and heading through the next moongate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Virtuous behavior?
Avatars? Next thing you know Microsoft will be disabling the In Nami Ylem routines.
I'm taking my Ankh and heading through the next moongate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495610</id>
	<title>Re:Discrimination</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261146660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The constitution doesn't say that it's bad to discriminate against fat people.</p><p>It protects people from discrimination based on factors they can't control, like which of the two major US political parties they were brainwashed into joining.</p><p>Anyway, MS can get the weight data the same way Nintendo Wii does. Buying the equipment is consent enough for me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The constitution does n't say that it 's bad to discriminate against fat people.It protects people from discrimination based on factors they ca n't control , like which of the two major US political parties they were brainwashed into joining.Anyway , MS can get the weight data the same way Nintendo Wii does .
Buying the equipment is consent enough for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The constitution doesn't say that it's bad to discriminate against fat people.It protects people from discrimination based on factors they can't control, like which of the two major US political parties they were brainwashed into joining.Anyway, MS can get the weight data the same way Nintendo Wii does.
Buying the equipment is consent enough for me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493036</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261130280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What makes you think that Microsoft speaks for all of the American population with their actions?<br>Sounds like you're ridiculing, belittling and discriminating an entire country with an improper stereotype.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What makes you think that Microsoft speaks for all of the American population with their actions ? Sounds like you 're ridiculing , belittling and discriminating an entire country with an improper stereotype .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What makes you think that Microsoft speaks for all of the American population with their actions?Sounds like you're ridiculing, belittling and discriminating an entire country with an improper stereotype.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30500596</id>
	<title>Thanks...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261218240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For deleting my post, and proving my point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For deleting my post , and proving my point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For deleting my post, and proving my point.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630</id>
	<title>It's a Free Market</title>
	<author>TrippTDF</author>
	<datestamp>1261168440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>if Microsoft does this, then the Playstation becomes the console for the large.</htmltext>
<tokenext>if Microsoft does this , then the Playstation becomes the console for the large .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if Microsoft does this, then the Playstation becomes the console for the large.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492496</id>
	<title>Re:Can I ?</title>
	<author>KarmaMB84</author>
	<datestamp>1261128120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>high fructose corn syrup<br> <br>
Suppresses sensations of fullness which would normally prevent overeating. In the United States the stuff is in EVERYTHING that would normally contain natural sugar. It has also been linked to diabetese or at least the same symptoms of diabetese.</htmltext>
<tokenext>high fructose corn syrup Suppresses sensations of fullness which would normally prevent overeating .
In the United States the stuff is in EVERYTHING that would normally contain natural sugar .
It has also been linked to diabetese or at least the same symptoms of diabetese .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>high fructose corn syrup 
Suppresses sensations of fullness which would normally prevent overeating.
In the United States the stuff is in EVERYTHING that would normally contain natural sugar.
It has also been linked to diabetese or at least the same symptoms of diabetese.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30512200</id>
	<title>Re:What about disibilities?</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1261411740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, it wouldn't.  I think everyone on here is taking this to an extreme that would in no way would ever be implemented.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it would n't .
I think everyone on here is taking this to an extreme that would in no way would ever be implemented .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it wouldn't.
I think everyone on here is taking this to an extreme that would in no way would ever be implemented.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491970</id>
	<title>New Microsoft slogan:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We'll tell you where you want to go today, you fat bastard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 'll tell you where you want to go today , you fat bastard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We'll tell you where you want to go today, you fat bastard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30504478</id>
	<title>oh boy.</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1261329720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you made conclusions out of your ass, and some morons modded you insightful.</p><p>show me ANYthing in what i said from which you can create a correlation in between the number of overweight people in a country, and the behavior towards overweight people in that country.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you made conclusions out of your ass , and some morons modded you insightful.show me ANYthing in what i said from which you can create a correlation in between the number of overweight people in a country , and the behavior towards overweight people in that country .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you made conclusions out of your ass, and some morons modded you insightful.show me ANYthing in what i said from which you can create a correlation in between the number of overweight people in a country, and the behavior towards overweight people in that country.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491910</id>
	<title>Re:So they want discrimatory features into games..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better, yet, they PATENT discrimination in games...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better , yet , they PATENT discrimination in games.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better, yet, they PATENT discrimination in games...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492518</id>
	<title>Re:WTF???</title>
	<author>Conchobair</author>
	<datestamp>1261128180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From your mom.  Or other parent or guardian that wants to control how much thier fat kid plays video games.</htmltext>
<tokenext>From your mom .
Or other parent or guardian that wants to control how much thier fat kid plays video games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From your mom.
Or other parent or guardian that wants to control how much thier fat kid plays video games.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491980</id>
	<title>Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That pic has been circulating around the internet for YEARS, newfag.</p><p>Anything posted to the web is fair game for public ridicule until the heat death of the Universe. If you've got a problem with that, don't post anything personal. Period.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That pic has been circulating around the internet for YEARS , newfag.Anything posted to the web is fair game for public ridicule until the heat death of the Universe .
If you 've got a problem with that , do n't post anything personal .
Period .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That pic has been circulating around the internet for YEARS, newfag.Anything posted to the web is fair game for public ridicule until the heat death of the Universe.
If you've got a problem with that, don't post anything personal.
Period.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491732</id>
	<title>HA!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ha! I have been shaming and banning fat people for years now.  Where is my patent?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ha !
I have been shaming and banning fat people for years now .
Where is my patent ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ha!
I have been shaming and banning fat people for years now.
Where is my patent?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493546</id>
	<title>Re:Not a totally bad idea</title>
	<author>Again</author>
	<datestamp>1261132380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You just ruined all the fun we were having making fun of Micro$ofat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You just ruined all the fun we were having making fun of Micro $ ofat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just ruined all the fun we were having making fun of Micro$ofat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492570</id>
	<title>All I care about is age.</title>
	<author>NoPantsJim</author>
	<datestamp>1261128360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want avatars that show me how old everyone is, so I know who to mute before I am hit with an avalanche of "Ur a gay fag!" and "Fucking Hacker!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want avatars that show me how old everyone is , so I know who to mute before I am hit with an avalanche of " Ur a gay fag !
" and " Fucking Hacker !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want avatars that show me how old everyone is, so I know who to mute before I am hit with an avalanche of "Ur a gay fag!
" and "Fucking Hacker!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496954</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>mOoZik</author>
	<datestamp>1261164240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That may be true, but Turkey spends its time waging war on other groups, such as Armenians, Greeks, Kurds, free speech, and just about anything that goes against Islam, Atafag, or ultranationalism.

What a wondeful country.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That may be true , but Turkey spends its time waging war on other groups , such as Armenians , Greeks , Kurds , free speech , and just about anything that goes against Islam , Atafag , or ultranationalism .
What a wondeful country .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That may be true, but Turkey spends its time waging war on other groups, such as Armenians, Greeks, Kurds, free speech, and just about anything that goes against Islam, Atafag, or ultranationalism.
What a wondeful country.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492844</id>
	<title>This sounds AWESOME</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1261129500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quick, tell me! Where do I sign up to pay for the privilege of being discriminated against for my views or appearance!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quick , tell me !
Where do I sign up to pay for the privilege of being discriminated against for my views or appearance !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quick, tell me!
Where do I sign up to pay for the privilege of being discriminated against for my views or appearance!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493912</id>
	<title>Re:Brilliant</title>
	<author>tsotha</author>
	<datestamp>1261134300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wasn't talking about kids as a group.  I was talking about fat people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was n't talking about kids as a group .
I was talking about fat people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wasn't talking about kids as a group.
I was talking about fat people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493222</id>
	<title>Is the picture really necessary?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261131060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If shaming fat gamers is wrong, then why tack on the picture of The Greatest Nintendo Warrior? Hasn't this poor slob suffered enough?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If shaming fat gamers is wrong , then why tack on the picture of The Greatest Nintendo Warrior ?
Has n't this poor slob suffered enough ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If shaming fat gamers is wrong, then why tack on the picture of The Greatest Nintendo Warrior?
Hasn't this poor slob suffered enough?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496780</id>
	<title>Re:You think this doesn't effect you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261161480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I had a picture of a vagina what the hell would I be playing games for?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I had a picture of a vagina what the hell would I be playing games for ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I had a picture of a vagina what the hell would I be playing games for?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30498494</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>shentino</author>
	<datestamp>1261238580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed.  The only reason I don't approve of this idea is that, while good in theory, I don't trust scumbag companies not to abuse it.</p><p>And...to be frank, I'm never signing the HIPAA release they'll need to get my health information anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed .
The only reason I do n't approve of this idea is that , while good in theory , I do n't trust scumbag companies not to abuse it.And...to be frank , I 'm never signing the HIPAA release they 'll need to get my health information anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed.
The only reason I don't approve of this idea is that, while good in theory, I don't trust scumbag companies not to abuse it.And...to be frank, I'm never signing the HIPAA release they'll need to get my health information anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492148</id>
	<title>Re:It's a Free Market</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261126920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yeah, but if Sony or some FOSS did this, the title would be "Sony creates inventive new method of encouraging healthful behavior"</p><p>Although for once I think it's Sony/FOSS getting kid-gloves treatment, than MS getting overly harsh treatment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah , but if Sony or some FOSS did this , the title would be " Sony creates inventive new method of encouraging healthful behavior " Although for once I think it 's Sony/FOSS getting kid-gloves treatment , than MS getting overly harsh treatment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah, but if Sony or some FOSS did this, the title would be "Sony creates inventive new method of encouraging healthful behavior"Although for once I think it's Sony/FOSS getting kid-gloves treatment, than MS getting overly harsh treatment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497438</id>
	<title>Re:And presumably all this will be done....</title>
	<author>X0563511</author>
	<datestamp>1261218360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yea, because Linux and Ubuntu are both the same word.</p><p><a href="http://www.tinycorelinux.com/" title="tinycorelinux.com">Linux is not bloated.</a> [tinycorelinux.com] Some distros may be, but that doesn't mean shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , because Linux and Ubuntu are both the same word.Linux is not bloated .
[ tinycorelinux.com ] Some distros may be , but that does n't mean shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, because Linux and Ubuntu are both the same word.Linux is not bloated.
[tinycorelinux.com] Some distros may be, but that doesn't mean shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495730</id>
	<title>WOW.....O.o Can Microsoft go any Lower?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261147800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As the San Antonio Chapter President of the Entertainment Consumer Association, I will VOTE AGAINST this proposal because I believe Medical Records is like your Social Security Number, PRIVATE INFORMATION! If Microsoft did such thing, I will stop using my Xbox360 and sell it immediately, because I WONT use XboxLive if they will reveal my private Medical Records. MICROSOFT CAN YOU GO ANY LOWER!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>As the San Antonio Chapter President of the Entertainment Consumer Association , I will VOTE AGAINST this proposal because I believe Medical Records is like your Social Security Number , PRIVATE INFORMATION !
If Microsoft did such thing , I will stop using my Xbox360 and sell it immediately , because I WONT use XboxLive if they will reveal my private Medical Records .
MICROSOFT CAN YOU GO ANY LOWER !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As the San Antonio Chapter President of the Entertainment Consumer Association, I will VOTE AGAINST this proposal because I believe Medical Records is like your Social Security Number, PRIVATE INFORMATION!
If Microsoft did such thing, I will stop using my Xbox360 and sell it immediately, because I WONT use XboxLive if they will reveal my private Medical Records.
MICROSOFT CAN YOU GO ANY LOWER!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495400</id>
	<title>Why not incorporate full-body game controllers?</title>
	<author>revjd909</author>
	<datestamp>1261144380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, Nintendo is going in the right direction with their Wii controllers.  Why not have wearable controllers, to make the gameplay more immersive?

Then, when you're battling the dragon, or having a shoot-out, you're using your whole body.  Want to do more damage to the dragon/goblin?  Swing your arm around faster.  Want to avoid getting shot? Lay down on the ground.

Instead of sitting on the couch, eating chips, and getting a nasty case of repetitive stress disorder on your thumbs and wrists, we could actually be exercising.

You could spot the addicts because they'd be fit as all hell.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , Nintendo is going in the right direction with their Wii controllers .
Why not have wearable controllers , to make the gameplay more immersive ?
Then , when you 're battling the dragon , or having a shoot-out , you 're using your whole body .
Want to do more damage to the dragon/goblin ?
Swing your arm around faster .
Want to avoid getting shot ?
Lay down on the ground .
Instead of sitting on the couch , eating chips , and getting a nasty case of repetitive stress disorder on your thumbs and wrists , we could actually be exercising .
You could spot the addicts because they 'd be fit as all hell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, Nintendo is going in the right direction with their Wii controllers.
Why not have wearable controllers, to make the gameplay more immersive?
Then, when you're battling the dragon, or having a shoot-out, you're using your whole body.
Want to do more damage to the dragon/goblin?
Swing your arm around faster.
Want to avoid getting shot?
Lay down on the ground.
Instead of sitting on the couch, eating chips, and getting a nasty case of repetitive stress disorder on your thumbs and wrists, we could actually be exercising.
You could spot the addicts because they'd be fit as all hell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492548</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1261128300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Give me a H<br>Give me an I<br>Give me a P<br>Give me a A<br>what does that spell</p><p>HIPA!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Give me a HGive me an IGive me a PGive me a Awhat does that spellHIPA !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give me a HGive me an IGive me a PGive me a Awhat does that spellHIPA!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494010</id>
	<title>Re:Discrimination</title>
	<author>guice</author>
	<datestamp>1261134900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Same reason we have women's night and men are still forced to pay a price. And lets not forget this discrimination is for *PLAYING A VIDEO GAME* --- hardly on the same level as buying a house or employment. Maybe you should complaining that WoW is PC only and not console - DISCRIMINATION TO PC GAMERS! Or a guy in a wheel chair can't play arcade games<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... We should start a class action lawsuit!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Same reason we have women 's night and men are still forced to pay a price .
And lets not forget this discrimination is for * PLAYING A VIDEO GAME * --- hardly on the same level as buying a house or employment .
Maybe you should complaining that WoW is PC only and not console - DISCRIMINATION TO PC GAMERS !
Or a guy in a wheel chair ca n't play arcade games ... We should start a class action lawsuit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same reason we have women's night and men are still forced to pay a price.
And lets not forget this discrimination is for *PLAYING A VIDEO GAME* --- hardly on the same level as buying a house or employment.
Maybe you should complaining that WoW is PC only and not console - DISCRIMINATION TO PC GAMERS!
Or a guy in a wheel chair can't play arcade games ... We should start a class action lawsuit!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30591882</id>
	<title>Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259841300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>I hope that the photo of the overweight dressed with Nintendo garb is from someone you know, and that they gave permission for you to humiliate them in front of thousands of other people.</i> </p><p>What makes you think the picture is humiliating?</p><p>If you think the picture is humiliating, aren't you the problem?</p><p>If we all thought there was nothing wrong with the picture, then there wouldn't be anything humiliating about it, would there?</p></div><p>Brilliant insight, friend. Building walls and hedges around ourselves to try and hide our defects has only created a world in which we all look at each other through such murky, ugly lenses. Nobody can be comfortable as they are; this affects the haters more than it affects those that they hate. How many of you out there find that you hate just about everyone, for the most minute little quibbling details, you are driven to near-loneliness by your inability to like others. Embrace humanity; none of us is perfect. Perfection is a state of stagnation from which no further improvement is possible. No human ever reaches this state, and thank heavens for that because it's lonely at the end of the road.</p><p>That picture is nothing more than a photo of a young kid probably having fun dressing up with his various nintendo gear... I don't see why you find that it should be humiliating to him... But I do understand why you say so. There is this pervasive aura of fear in human society these days. People so afraid of being seen as deviant, defective, weird, afraid of making waves or ripples, afraid of being rejected by other humans. You repress your own harmless desires for no good reason, and sup on hatred and ridicule and constantly compare and contrast everything with one another in a subtle dance of synchronization whereby you adopt the characteristics most likely to help you avoid social friction.</p><p>Conflict is the BREAD and WATER of life. Without it, you cannot be called a living thing. You are flotsam in the stream of particles comprising timespace. What else but conflict gives the world evidence that each of us has his own will?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope that the photo of the overweight dressed with Nintendo garb is from someone you know , and that they gave permission for you to humiliate them in front of thousands of other people .
What makes you think the picture is humiliating ? If you think the picture is humiliating , are n't you the problem ? If we all thought there was nothing wrong with the picture , then there would n't be anything humiliating about it , would there ? Brilliant insight , friend .
Building walls and hedges around ourselves to try and hide our defects has only created a world in which we all look at each other through such murky , ugly lenses .
Nobody can be comfortable as they are ; this affects the haters more than it affects those that they hate .
How many of you out there find that you hate just about everyone , for the most minute little quibbling details , you are driven to near-loneliness by your inability to like others .
Embrace humanity ; none of us is perfect .
Perfection is a state of stagnation from which no further improvement is possible .
No human ever reaches this state , and thank heavens for that because it 's lonely at the end of the road.That picture is nothing more than a photo of a young kid probably having fun dressing up with his various nintendo gear... I do n't see why you find that it should be humiliating to him... But I do understand why you say so .
There is this pervasive aura of fear in human society these days .
People so afraid of being seen as deviant , defective , weird , afraid of making waves or ripples , afraid of being rejected by other humans .
You repress your own harmless desires for no good reason , and sup on hatred and ridicule and constantly compare and contrast everything with one another in a subtle dance of synchronization whereby you adopt the characteristics most likely to help you avoid social friction.Conflict is the BREAD and WATER of life .
Without it , you can not be called a living thing .
You are flotsam in the stream of particles comprising timespace .
What else but conflict gives the world evidence that each of us has his own will ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I hope that the photo of the overweight dressed with Nintendo garb is from someone you know, and that they gave permission for you to humiliate them in front of thousands of other people.
What makes you think the picture is humiliating?If you think the picture is humiliating, aren't you the problem?If we all thought there was nothing wrong with the picture, then there wouldn't be anything humiliating about it, would there?Brilliant insight, friend.
Building walls and hedges around ourselves to try and hide our defects has only created a world in which we all look at each other through such murky, ugly lenses.
Nobody can be comfortable as they are; this affects the haters more than it affects those that they hate.
How many of you out there find that you hate just about everyone, for the most minute little quibbling details, you are driven to near-loneliness by your inability to like others.
Embrace humanity; none of us is perfect.
Perfection is a state of stagnation from which no further improvement is possible.
No human ever reaches this state, and thank heavens for that because it's lonely at the end of the road.That picture is nothing more than a photo of a young kid probably having fun dressing up with his various nintendo gear... I don't see why you find that it should be humiliating to him... But I do understand why you say so.
There is this pervasive aura of fear in human society these days.
People so afraid of being seen as deviant, defective, weird, afraid of making waves or ripples, afraid of being rejected by other humans.
You repress your own harmless desires for no good reason, and sup on hatred and ridicule and constantly compare and contrast everything with one another in a subtle dance of synchronization whereby you adopt the characteristics most likely to help you avoid social friction.Conflict is the BREAD and WATER of life.
Without it, you cannot be called a living thing.
You are flotsam in the stream of particles comprising timespace.
What else but conflict gives the world evidence that each of us has his own will?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616</id>
	<title>Digital medical records</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So THAT's why we're going to have digital medical records...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So THAT 's why we 're going to have digital medical records.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So THAT's why we're going to have digital medical records...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494366</id>
	<title>Re:*cough* HIPAA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261136760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least until they pass the "Health Information Provisions for Preventing Obesity" (aka HIPPO) act, which will grant what was previously known as "highly sensitive" medical data to companies that have no relation to the medical field.</p><p>Once this data is made available, persecution of individuals will be deferred to private corporations, thereby reducing the amount of taxpayer dollars that are spent for the government to do this dirty work.</p><p>DISCLAIMER:  The opinions presented above are satire and do not represent the views of Slashdot or the poster.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least until they pass the " Health Information Provisions for Preventing Obesity " ( aka HIPPO ) act , which will grant what was previously known as " highly sensitive " medical data to companies that have no relation to the medical field.Once this data is made available , persecution of individuals will be deferred to private corporations , thereby reducing the amount of taxpayer dollars that are spent for the government to do this dirty work.DISCLAIMER : The opinions presented above are satire and do not represent the views of Slashdot or the poster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least until they pass the "Health Information Provisions for Preventing Obesity" (aka HIPPO) act, which will grant what was previously known as "highly sensitive" medical data to companies that have no relation to the medical field.Once this data is made available, persecution of individuals will be deferred to private corporations, thereby reducing the amount of taxpayer dollars that are spent for the government to do this dirty work.DISCLAIMER:  The opinions presented above are satire and do not represent the views of Slashdot or the poster.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492874</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496114</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>dwye</author>
	<datestamp>1261151580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>NO GOD DAMNED GAME COMPANY SHOULD BE ABLE TO ACCESS YOUR FUCKING MEDICAL RECORDS TO FUCK WITH YOUR GAMING TO BEGIN WITH. (For ANY reason really.)</p></div></blockquote><p>

Even for a "game" created for your own exercise program, prescribed by a doctor to help you lose weight?  Granted, I wouldn't want this added to my WoW avatar, but I can imagine sane reasons for the idea behind this patent.  Imagine that this was built into a Nivenesque autodoc, for example, and it seems as reasonable as it accessing your medical profile to control the dosage of your anti-psychotics.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>NO GOD DAMNED GAME COMPANY SHOULD BE ABLE TO ACCESS YOUR FUCKING MEDICAL RECORDS TO FUCK WITH YOUR GAMING TO BEGIN WITH .
( For ANY reason really .
) Even for a " game " created for your own exercise program , prescribed by a doctor to help you lose weight ?
Granted , I would n't want this added to my WoW avatar , but I can imagine sane reasons for the idea behind this patent .
Imagine that this was built into a Nivenesque autodoc , for example , and it seems as reasonable as it accessing your medical profile to control the dosage of your anti-psychotics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NO GOD DAMNED GAME COMPANY SHOULD BE ABLE TO ACCESS YOUR FUCKING MEDICAL RECORDS TO FUCK WITH YOUR GAMING TO BEGIN WITH.
(For ANY reason really.
)

Even for a "game" created for your own exercise program, prescribed by a doctor to help you lose weight?
Granted, I wouldn't want this added to my WoW avatar, but I can imagine sane reasons for the idea behind this patent.
Imagine that this was built into a Nivenesque autodoc, for example, and it seems as reasonable as it accessing your medical profile to control the dosage of your anti-psychotics.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493946</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>myrdos2</author>
	<datestamp>1261134540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I bet the project natal cams will be able to figure out your weight.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet the project natal cams will be able to figure out your weight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet the project natal cams will be able to figure out your weight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493658</id>
	<title>Re:You think this doesn't effect you</title>
	<author>Fulcrum of Evil</author>
	<datestamp>1261132980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I predict there will be absolutely no "hot chick" avatars in the Microsoft MMORPGs!</p> </div><p>Well of course: if the obsessive nerds find out that the hot chick in game X is actually a hot chick in real life, they'll harass her til she leaves.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I predict there will be absolutely no " hot chick " avatars in the Microsoft MMORPGs !
Well of course : if the obsessive nerds find out that the hot chick in game X is actually a hot chick in real life , they 'll harass her til she leaves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I predict there will be absolutely no "hot chick" avatars in the Microsoft MMORPGs!
Well of course: if the obsessive nerds find out that the hot chick in game X is actually a hot chick in real life, they'll harass her til she leaves.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492850</id>
	<title>I wonder...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>will they also be making bald avatars?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>will they also be making bald avatars ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will they also be making bald avatars?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494542</id>
	<title>Re:And presumably all this will be done....</title>
	<author>Tolkien</author>
	<datestamp>1261137660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Heh.

#define WIN32\_LEAN\_AND\_MEAN<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Heh .
# define WIN32 \ _LEAN \ _AND \ _MEAN : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heh.
#define WIN32\_LEAN\_AND\_MEAN :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492784</id>
	<title>Microsoft's MArket</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There goes Microsoft's gaming market.  What next? "Sorry, this console doesn't turn on for smokers."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There goes Microsoft 's gaming market .
What next ?
" Sorry , this console does n't turn on for smokers .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There goes Microsoft's gaming market.
What next?
"Sorry, this console doesn't turn on for smokers.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493564</id>
	<title>Re:WTF???</title>
	<author>radtea</author>
	<datestamp>1261132440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Where, exactly, does Microsoft think it's going to get this stuff from? The summary actually makes reference to health records.</i></p><p>What stuff, and for what purpose?  The only thing you can tell by reading the summary is that MS has filed a patent application for something.  That something has a marginally-different-from-zero chance of being something to do with games and health, but you have to understand how<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. patent stories are generated:</p><p>1) Find out about a patent application from an organization we all love to hate<br>2) Read the patent title and abstract<br>3) Publish a summary that badly distorts the information in the title and abstract<br>4) ???<br>5) Profit!!!</p><p>I'm pretty sure the "???" in step 4 relates to getting lots of pageviews from<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. readers who, despite having seen exactly the same process happen again and again and again, and having had explained to them repeatedly that the only thing that matters in a patent is the claims, not the title or abstract--much less the summary that has been spat out by the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. editors--still insist on reading the summary and responding as if it had something to do with the American patent system, which the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. editors love.  We know they love it because they never attack it, and find it necessary to make stuff up about it for people to take offense at, because they think that if they told the truth about it everyone else would love it as much as they do (they'd be wrong about that, but that is clearly what they believe.)</p><p>The curious thing is:  why do the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. editors love the American patent system so much?<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where , exactly , does Microsoft think it 's going to get this stuff from ?
The summary actually makes reference to health records.What stuff , and for what purpose ?
The only thing you can tell by reading the summary is that MS has filed a patent application for something .
That something has a marginally-different-from-zero chance of being something to do with games and health , but you have to understand how / .
patent stories are generated : 1 ) Find out about a patent application from an organization we all love to hate2 ) Read the patent title and abstract3 ) Publish a summary that badly distorts the information in the title and abstract4 ) ? ?
? 5 ) Profit ! !
! I 'm pretty sure the " ? ? ?
" in step 4 relates to getting lots of pageviews from / .
readers who , despite having seen exactly the same process happen again and again and again , and having had explained to them repeatedly that the only thing that matters in a patent is the claims , not the title or abstract--much less the summary that has been spat out by the / .
editors--still insist on reading the summary and responding as if it had something to do with the American patent system , which the / .
editors love .
We know they love it because they never attack it , and find it necessary to make stuff up about it for people to take offense at , because they think that if they told the truth about it everyone else would love it as much as they do ( they 'd be wrong about that , but that is clearly what they believe .
) The curious thing is : why do the / .
editors love the American patent system so much ?
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where, exactly, does Microsoft think it's going to get this stuff from?
The summary actually makes reference to health records.What stuff, and for what purpose?
The only thing you can tell by reading the summary is that MS has filed a patent application for something.
That something has a marginally-different-from-zero chance of being something to do with games and health, but you have to understand how /.
patent stories are generated:1) Find out about a patent application from an organization we all love to hate2) Read the patent title and abstract3) Publish a summary that badly distorts the information in the title and abstract4) ??
?5) Profit!!
!I'm pretty sure the "???
" in step 4 relates to getting lots of pageviews from /.
readers who, despite having seen exactly the same process happen again and again and again, and having had explained to them repeatedly that the only thing that matters in a patent is the claims, not the title or abstract--much less the summary that has been spat out by the /.
editors--still insist on reading the summary and responding as if it had something to do with the American patent system, which the /.
editors love.
We know they love it because they never attack it, and find it necessary to make stuff up about it for people to take offense at, because they think that if they told the truth about it everyone else would love it as much as they do (they'd be wrong about that, but that is clearly what they believe.
)The curious thing is:  why do the /.
editors love the American patent system so much?
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492770</id>
	<title>Re:You think this doesn't effect you</title>
	<author>mea37</author>
	<datestamp>1261129200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just because they're patenting something, doesn't mean they're going to apply it universally.  Nor, if you read what they're talking about, is it necessarily about making the avatar match all of the player's real-life characteristics.</p><p>Really the point of this is to allow for games that take, as part of their input, characteristics like the player's weight.  In other words, real-world activities and their impact on your body become part of playing the game.</p><p>Good?  Bad?  Like most ideas, it depends on what they do with it.</p><p>OTOH, I'm not even going to start trying to figure out what, if anything, related to this idea should be eligible for patent protection.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because they 're patenting something , does n't mean they 're going to apply it universally .
Nor , if you read what they 're talking about , is it necessarily about making the avatar match all of the player 's real-life characteristics.Really the point of this is to allow for games that take , as part of their input , characteristics like the player 's weight .
In other words , real-world activities and their impact on your body become part of playing the game.Good ?
Bad ? Like most ideas , it depends on what they do with it.OTOH , I 'm not even going to start trying to figure out what , if anything , related to this idea should be eligible for patent protection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because they're patenting something, doesn't mean they're going to apply it universally.
Nor, if you read what they're talking about, is it necessarily about making the avatar match all of the player's real-life characteristics.Really the point of this is to allow for games that take, as part of their input, characteristics like the player's weight.
In other words, real-world activities and their impact on your body become part of playing the game.Good?
Bad?  Like most ideas, it depends on what they do with it.OTOH, I'm not even going to start trying to figure out what, if anything, related to this idea should be eligible for patent protection.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492382</id>
	<title>Microsoft already has ...</title>
	<author>padrepio</author>
	<datestamp>1261127700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the perfect avatar for the pictured child; its called the BSOD.  Seriously though, so when does a software company think it should replace parenting?</htmltext>
<tokenext>the perfect avatar for the pictured child ; its called the BSOD .
Seriously though , so when does a software company think it should replace parenting ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the perfect avatar for the pictured child; its called the BSOD.
Seriously though, so when does a software company think it should replace parenting?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494806</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise stimulates endorphins</title>
	<author>BigSlowTarget</author>
	<datestamp>1261139340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, your name is Akido37  of course exercise stimulates endorphins in your brain.  I'm named BigSlowTarget, exercise stimulates pain in my ass.</p><p>Even when I was young and fit exercise and pleasure never went together - people are wired in different ways.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , your name is Akido37 of course exercise stimulates endorphins in your brain .
I 'm named BigSlowTarget , exercise stimulates pain in my ass.Even when I was young and fit exercise and pleasure never went together - people are wired in different ways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, your name is Akido37  of course exercise stimulates endorphins in your brain.
I'm named BigSlowTarget, exercise stimulates pain in my ass.Even when I was young and fit exercise and pleasure never went together - people are wired in different ways.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492290</id>
	<title>Re:Not a totally bad idea</title>
	<author>benjamindees</author>
	<datestamp>1261127460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, in this "game", is healthcare subsidized?  Is everyone taxed in order to encourage certain arbitrary health regimens over others?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , in this " game " , is healthcare subsidized ?
Is everyone taxed in order to encourage certain arbitrary health regimens over others ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, in this "game", is healthcare subsidized?
Is everyone taxed in order to encourage certain arbitrary health regimens over others?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491702</id>
	<title>Remember the old joke?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where the guy tries to order pizza, but the pizza shop checks his health records... then denies him the pizza??  Sounds like it's becoming true!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where the guy tries to order pizza , but the pizza shop checks his health records... then denies him the pizza ? ?
Sounds like it 's becoming true ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where the guy tries to order pizza, but the pizza shop checks his health records... then denies him the pizza??
Sounds like it's becoming true!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492874</id>
	<title>*cough* HIPAA</title>
	<author>jvonk</author>
	<datestamp>1261129620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health\_Insurance\_Portability\_and\_Accountability\_Act" title="wikipedia.org">Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act</a> [wikipedia.org]. At least you didnt spell it with two "p"'s. That's the worst.<br> <br>
Anyway, I am very cynical of HIPAA. It has never protected me from health care providers making disclosures to third parties when I wanted (and was entitled to) privacy, and it just adds inconvenience when I want to do simple things like having a family member pick up one of my prescriptions ("Oh my god! We could never allow that, even if we had written authorization on file! Think of your privacy!").<br> <br>
So... what did HIPAA accomplish? Well, now when I go to a pharmacy, they force me to sign a HIPAA disclosure/waiver before they will fulfill my prescriptions. What does this disclosure say? Stuff along the lines of "here is our policy on how we will violate your privacy when we feel like it. Don't you feel better knowing?". Of course, I could choose not to sign, but then they won't fill my prescriptions. Ah, being presented with a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobson's\_choice" title="wikipedia.org">Hobson's choice</a> [wikipedia.org] over medical necessities always warms my heart about the human spirit.<br> <br> <i>"Blessed are the coercers, for surely they will fuck you over while smiling at you."</i> <br> <br>
Anyway, to my point: yes, you are protected by HIPAA. However, my expectation is that they will just circumvent it by a click-through EULA waiver. No waiver, no play. There you go. Hobson would be proud.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [ wikipedia.org ] .
At least you didnt spell it with two " p " 's .
That 's the worst .
Anyway , I am very cynical of HIPAA .
It has never protected me from health care providers making disclosures to third parties when I wanted ( and was entitled to ) privacy , and it just adds inconvenience when I want to do simple things like having a family member pick up one of my prescriptions ( " Oh my god !
We could never allow that , even if we had written authorization on file !
Think of your privacy ! " ) .
So... what did HIPAA accomplish ?
Well , now when I go to a pharmacy , they force me to sign a HIPAA disclosure/waiver before they will fulfill my prescriptions .
What does this disclosure say ?
Stuff along the lines of " here is our policy on how we will violate your privacy when we feel like it .
Do n't you feel better knowing ? " .
Of course , I could choose not to sign , but then they wo n't fill my prescriptions .
Ah , being presented with a Hobson 's choice [ wikipedia.org ] over medical necessities always warms my heart about the human spirit .
" Blessed are the coercers , for surely they will fuck you over while smiling at you .
" Anyway , to my point : yes , you are protected by HIPAA .
However , my expectation is that they will just circumvent it by a click-through EULA waiver .
No waiver , no play .
There you go .
Hobson would be proud .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [wikipedia.org].
At least you didnt spell it with two "p"'s.
That's the worst.
Anyway, I am very cynical of HIPAA.
It has never protected me from health care providers making disclosures to third parties when I wanted (and was entitled to) privacy, and it just adds inconvenience when I want to do simple things like having a family member pick up one of my prescriptions ("Oh my god!
We could never allow that, even if we had written authorization on file!
Think of your privacy!").
So... what did HIPAA accomplish?
Well, now when I go to a pharmacy, they force me to sign a HIPAA disclosure/waiver before they will fulfill my prescriptions.
What does this disclosure say?
Stuff along the lines of "here is our policy on how we will violate your privacy when we feel like it.
Don't you feel better knowing?".
Of course, I could choose not to sign, but then they won't fill my prescriptions.
Ah, being presented with a Hobson's choice [wikipedia.org] over medical necessities always warms my heart about the human spirit.
"Blessed are the coercers, for surely they will fuck you over while smiling at you.
"  
Anyway, to my point: yes, you are protected by HIPAA.
However, my expectation is that they will just circumvent it by a click-through EULA waiver.
No waiver, no play.
There you go.
Hobson would be proud.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491760</id>
	<title>Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor ki</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope that the photo of the overweight dressed with Nintendo garb is from someone you know, and that they gave permission for you to humiliate them in front of thousands of other people.</p><p>Otherwise, it's cruel. He probably meant for that photo to remain private.</p><p>The poor kid needs your encouragement, not your ridicule. Can I find some embarrassing photos of you when you were a kid and post them online?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope that the photo of the overweight dressed with Nintendo garb is from someone you know , and that they gave permission for you to humiliate them in front of thousands of other people.Otherwise , it 's cruel .
He probably meant for that photo to remain private.The poor kid needs your encouragement , not your ridicule .
Can I find some embarrassing photos of you when you were a kid and post them online ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope that the photo of the overweight dressed with Nintendo garb is from someone you know, and that they gave permission for you to humiliate them in front of thousands of other people.Otherwise, it's cruel.
He probably meant for that photo to remain private.The poor kid needs your encouragement, not your ridicule.
Can I find some embarrassing photos of you when you were a kid and post them online?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491988</id>
	<title>Re:Patent Office</title>
	<author>Amouth</author>
	<datestamp>1261169580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you can't Patent a drug - only the process to manufacture it (which has to be FDA approved too).</p><p>the reason you wait for generic drugs is that even after a drug has passed the FDA if you where to make it using a different process then you would still have to go through FDA approval for it - might as well come up with something different.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you ca n't Patent a drug - only the process to manufacture it ( which has to be FDA approved too ) .the reason you wait for generic drugs is that even after a drug has passed the FDA if you where to make it using a different process then you would still have to go through FDA approval for it - might as well come up with something different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you can't Patent a drug - only the process to manufacture it (which has to be FDA approved too).the reason you wait for generic drugs is that even after a drug has passed the FDA if you where to make it using a different process then you would still have to go through FDA approval for it - might as well come up with something different.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492860</id>
	<title>Re:WTF???</title>
	<author>straponego</author>
	<datestamp>1261129500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Health records?  Man, MS employee fatatars (or avatards, whatever these lovely things will be called), will have a lot of stabholes...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Health records ?
Man , MS employee fatatars ( or avatards , whatever these lovely things will be called ) , will have a lot of stabholes.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Health records?
Man, MS employee fatatars (or avatards, whatever these lovely things will be called), will have a lot of stabholes...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492542</id>
	<title>nazi-like</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1261128300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yet I want this "No fat chicks" edition of the 360.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet I want this " No fat chicks " edition of the 360 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet I want this "No fat chicks" edition of the 360.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30501298</id>
	<title>Microsoft suppodely caring about health</title>
	<author>adam2348</author>
	<datestamp>1261228200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is Microsoft's way of showing they care about their gamers health.  Something like saying, "we want you to be healthy so we are going to limit you from playing the game."  Basically, this is combating the idea that games are the reason for people being fat. For instance, if you are addicted to a game too much, you may not exercise like you normally would.  They want you to be addicted, so they just found another way to make sure you still exercise.   They decided to limit or block you from playing until you have exercised.

They are talking about more than just checking your medical records here.  They are talking about checking your health instantly before you try to play.  Or maybe somehow linking in to even more record keeping, that isn't used yet, by places like gyms.

They also want to find ways to make sure your not slacking on other aspects of your life because of their games.  That or they just don't want you to be able to blame them anymore.  They want to be able to tell if you are socializing, getting along with people, and just about anything else people blame games for.

What it amounts to is, "Have you been a good boy today?  Well then, you can play." Otherwise, get out there and fix what your not doing.  Fighting with your girlfriend?  Go make up, then you can play.

*ring ring*, real life is calling.  If you don't want to answer, we'll glue the phone to your ear!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is Microsoft 's way of showing they care about their gamers health .
Something like saying , " we want you to be healthy so we are going to limit you from playing the game .
" Basically , this is combating the idea that games are the reason for people being fat .
For instance , if you are addicted to a game too much , you may not exercise like you normally would .
They want you to be addicted , so they just found another way to make sure you still exercise .
They decided to limit or block you from playing until you have exercised .
They are talking about more than just checking your medical records here .
They are talking about checking your health instantly before you try to play .
Or maybe somehow linking in to even more record keeping , that is n't used yet , by places like gyms .
They also want to find ways to make sure your not slacking on other aspects of your life because of their games .
That or they just do n't want you to be able to blame them anymore .
They want to be able to tell if you are socializing , getting along with people , and just about anything else people blame games for .
What it amounts to is , " Have you been a good boy today ?
Well then , you can play .
" Otherwise , get out there and fix what your not doing .
Fighting with your girlfriend ?
Go make up , then you can play .
* ring ring * , real life is calling .
If you do n't want to answer , we 'll glue the phone to your ear !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is Microsoft's way of showing they care about their gamers health.
Something like saying, "we want you to be healthy so we are going to limit you from playing the game.
"  Basically, this is combating the idea that games are the reason for people being fat.
For instance, if you are addicted to a game too much, you may not exercise like you normally would.
They want you to be addicted, so they just found another way to make sure you still exercise.
They decided to limit or block you from playing until you have exercised.
They are talking about more than just checking your medical records here.
They are talking about checking your health instantly before you try to play.
Or maybe somehow linking in to even more record keeping, that isn't used yet, by places like gyms.
They also want to find ways to make sure your not slacking on other aspects of your life because of their games.
That or they just don't want you to be able to blame them anymore.
They want to be able to tell if you are socializing, getting along with people, and just about anything else people blame games for.
What it amounts to is, "Have you been a good boy today?
Well then, you can play.
" Otherwise, get out there and fix what your not doing.
Fighting with your girlfriend?
Go make up, then you can play.
*ring ring*, real life is calling.
If you don't want to answer, we'll glue the phone to your ear!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494304</id>
	<title>Acceptable Prejudice</title>
	<author>Gogogoch</author>
	<datestamp>1261136460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sizeism is one of several prejudices that seem currently acceptable by society. Imagine if the M$ news release said that game experience would change if the player were black; levels inaccessible because you were the wrong colour. Or female. Or gay. Or disabled.</p><p>25-30\% of Americans are obese, but much of society (including the obese) seem to buy-in to the view that skinny is good and obese is obscene - and so nothing changes. Look at the comments here. Similar comments against gays or blacks would be dismissed as troll, but here we're having a good laugh. Anyway, with so many people being targeted by M$ I doubt that M$ is doing itself much of a favour.</p><p>Slashdotters who are quite happy to say: "fuck you, go on a diet ha ha" might do better by standing up for minorities that don't include themselves. In today's world we all have a job to protect our rights from the fucked-up ambitions of government, interest groups, and business, and divide-and-conquer is one of their ways of eroding rights.</p><p>"Lets have DRM, filtering, and inspection because some people are pirates", "Let's have biometric responses and limitations because some people are fat", "lets limit others because of IQ", "lets fuck with them because they are a minority, and the majority will let it pass". Well its possible to make up distinctions that catch all of us - we all belong to one minority or another depending on how creatively you cut the cake -  and if we go down this path we all get fucked. So we have to stick up for others as if it were ourselves.</p><p>OK, help me get down off my soap box. Anyway, I'm a fat bastard and always have been. Nothing I can do about it. But I'll be alright so long as besides having fat avatars you can have avatars with 10" dicks<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sizeism is one of several prejudices that seem currently acceptable by society .
Imagine if the M $ news release said that game experience would change if the player were black ; levels inaccessible because you were the wrong colour .
Or female .
Or gay .
Or disabled.25-30 \ % of Americans are obese , but much of society ( including the obese ) seem to buy-in to the view that skinny is good and obese is obscene - and so nothing changes .
Look at the comments here .
Similar comments against gays or blacks would be dismissed as troll , but here we 're having a good laugh .
Anyway , with so many people being targeted by M $ I doubt that M $ is doing itself much of a favour.Slashdotters who are quite happy to say : " fuck you , go on a diet ha ha " might do better by standing up for minorities that do n't include themselves .
In today 's world we all have a job to protect our rights from the fucked-up ambitions of government , interest groups , and business , and divide-and-conquer is one of their ways of eroding rights .
" Lets have DRM , filtering , and inspection because some people are pirates " , " Let 's have biometric responses and limitations because some people are fat " , " lets limit others because of IQ " , " lets fuck with them because they are a minority , and the majority will let it pass " .
Well its possible to make up distinctions that catch all of us - we all belong to one minority or another depending on how creatively you cut the cake - and if we go down this path we all get fucked .
So we have to stick up for others as if it were ourselves.OK , help me get down off my soap box .
Anyway , I 'm a fat bastard and always have been .
Nothing I can do about it .
But I 'll be alright so long as besides having fat avatars you can have avatars with 10 " dicks : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sizeism is one of several prejudices that seem currently acceptable by society.
Imagine if the M$ news release said that game experience would change if the player were black; levels inaccessible because you were the wrong colour.
Or female.
Or gay.
Or disabled.25-30\% of Americans are obese, but much of society (including the obese) seem to buy-in to the view that skinny is good and obese is obscene - and so nothing changes.
Look at the comments here.
Similar comments against gays or blacks would be dismissed as troll, but here we're having a good laugh.
Anyway, with so many people being targeted by M$ I doubt that M$ is doing itself much of a favour.Slashdotters who are quite happy to say: "fuck you, go on a diet ha ha" might do better by standing up for minorities that don't include themselves.
In today's world we all have a job to protect our rights from the fucked-up ambitions of government, interest groups, and business, and divide-and-conquer is one of their ways of eroding rights.
"Lets have DRM, filtering, and inspection because some people are pirates", "Let's have biometric responses and limitations because some people are fat", "lets limit others because of IQ", "lets fuck with them because they are a minority, and the majority will let it pass".
Well its possible to make up distinctions that catch all of us - we all belong to one minority or another depending on how creatively you cut the cake -  and if we go down this path we all get fucked.
So we have to stick up for others as if it were ourselves.OK, help me get down off my soap box.
Anyway, I'm a fat bastard and always have been.
Nothing I can do about it.
But I'll be alright so long as besides having fat avatars you can have avatars with 10" dicks :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30528172</id>
	<title>Re:You think this doesn't effect you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261473000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; I predict there will be absolutely no "hot chick" avatars in the Microsoft MMORPGs!</p><p>Well except for me!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>  I predict there will be absolutely no " hot chick " avatars in the Microsoft MMORPGs ! Well except for me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
  I predict there will be absolutely no "hot chick" avatars in the Microsoft MMORPGs!Well except for me!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493732</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261133340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many obese people have you seen?  What kind of proportion of your society are they?  Are there any social stigmas in Turkey for obesity?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many obese people have you seen ?
What kind of proportion of your society are they ?
Are there any social stigmas in Turkey for obesity ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many obese people have you seen?
What kind of proportion of your society are they?
Are there any social stigmas in Turkey for obesity?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491962</id>
	<title>Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1261169460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don&rsquo;t you send out cease-and-desist letters to <a href="http://www.tineye.com/search?url=http://a.fsdn.com/sd/firehose/007/907/400-1.png" title="tineye.com">all the other websites that are using it</a> [tineye.com]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why don    t you send out cease-and-desist letters to all the other websites that are using it [ tineye.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don’t you send out cease-and-desist letters to all the other websites that are using it [tineye.com]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491780</id>
	<title>Patent Office</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm glad the patent office is spending time on this rather that working on useless things like new life saving drugs...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad the patent office is spending time on this rather that working on useless things like new life saving drugs.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad the patent office is spending time on this rather that working on useless things like new life saving drugs...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493104</id>
	<title>Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state.</title>
	<author>hansamurai</author>
	<datestamp>1261130520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least I have the option to not give Microsoft any money if I don't agree with their practices.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least I have the option to not give Microsoft any money if I do n't agree with their practices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least I have the option to not give Microsoft any money if I don't agree with their practices.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492086</id>
	<title>Re:WTF???</title>
	<author>Amouth</author>
	<datestamp>1261169880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>well one thing i could see them pushing this patent onto would be the use of VR for post rehab counculing.</p><p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/07/16/db.secondlifetherapy/index.html" title="cnn.com">http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/07/16/db.secondlifetherapy/index.html</a> [cnn.com]</p><p>the rehab unit would have access to the health records and we can assume consent (in the fine print) to do this as a way of keeping people straight and not delusional.</p><p>It sounds stupid - but so does Avatars in rehab - or Dances with Smurfs.</p><p>But this isn't completely point less as if tweeter and Facebook hasn't taught us already too many people will take what ever is thrown at them</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>well one thing i could see them pushing this patent onto would be the use of VR for post rehab counculing.http : //www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/07/16/db.secondlifetherapy/index.html [ cnn.com ] the rehab unit would have access to the health records and we can assume consent ( in the fine print ) to do this as a way of keeping people straight and not delusional.It sounds stupid - but so does Avatars in rehab - or Dances with Smurfs.But this is n't completely point less as if tweeter and Facebook has n't taught us already too many people will take what ever is thrown at them</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well one thing i could see them pushing this patent onto would be the use of VR for post rehab counculing.http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/07/16/db.secondlifetherapy/index.html [cnn.com]the rehab unit would have access to the health records and we can assume consent (in the fine print) to do this as a way of keeping people straight and not delusional.It sounds stupid - but so does Avatars in rehab - or Dances with Smurfs.But this isn't completely point less as if tweeter and Facebook hasn't taught us already too many people will take what ever is thrown at them</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492880</id>
	<title>"Religious belief"...</title>
	<author>Mornedhel</author>
	<datestamp>1261129680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, what ? I get to play as a Paladin of the Invisible Pink Unicorn ?</p><p>I get improved resistances vs Purple Oysters (of Doom) and extra HP from pineapple pizza or something ?</p><p>Oooh, can we start in-game jihads against the Pastafarian guys ? Or do only mainstream religion followers get to do that ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , what ?
I get to play as a Paladin of the Invisible Pink Unicorn ? I get improved resistances vs Purple Oysters ( of Doom ) and extra HP from pineapple pizza or something ? Oooh , can we start in-game jihads against the Pastafarian guys ?
Or do only mainstream religion followers get to do that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, what ?
I get to play as a Paladin of the Invisible Pink Unicorn ?I get improved resistances vs Purple Oysters (of Doom) and extra HP from pineapple pizza or something ?Oooh, can we start in-game jihads against the Pastafarian guys ?
Or do only mainstream religion followers get to do that ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30498456</id>
	<title>I predict...</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1261237980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've been looking into my crystal ball, and I predict that the number of hot girls on the internet is going to drop to near-zero.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been looking into my crystal ball , and I predict that the number of hot girls on the internet is going to drop to near-zero .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been looking into my crystal ball, and I predict that the number of hot girls on the internet is going to drop to near-zero.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493660</id>
	<title>Re:Patent Office</title>
	<author>Actually, I do RTFA</author>
	<datestamp>1261132980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Thats right. Nothing says progress like granting a extortionate monopoly on a drug that could save millions, if only they could afford it.</p></div></blockquote><p>Their protection time is 17 years + time spent waiting on a decision.  I'd rather all medicine got approved 16.9 years before it was submitted.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats right .
Nothing says progress like granting a extortionate monopoly on a drug that could save millions , if only they could afford it.Their protection time is 17 years + time spent waiting on a decision .
I 'd rather all medicine got approved 16.9 years before it was submitted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats right.
Nothing says progress like granting a extortionate monopoly on a drug that could save millions, if only they could afford it.Their protection time is 17 years + time spent waiting on a decision.
I'd rather all medicine got approved 16.9 years before it was submitted.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492576</id>
	<title>Wii Fit already does this, no?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wii Fit avatars "expand" to fit your weight when stepping on the board.  My cute little Mii popped up positively pudgy when I tried it out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wii Fit avatars " expand " to fit your weight when stepping on the board .
My cute little Mii popped up positively pudgy when I tried it out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wii Fit avatars "expand" to fit your weight when stepping on the board.
My cute little Mii popped up positively pudgy when I tried it out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492014</id>
	<title>Interesting</title>
	<author>KitsuneSoftware</author>
	<datestamp>1261169640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This seems like a rather interesting concept. From the summary, it's probably illegal to implement due to medical privacy (and if not, it should be) but it's still interesting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems like a rather interesting concept .
From the summary , it 's probably illegal to implement due to medical privacy ( and if not , it should be ) but it 's still interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems like a rather interesting concept.
From the summary, it's probably illegal to implement due to medical privacy (and if not, it should be) but it's still interesting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492722</id>
	<title>Re:And presumably all this will be done....</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1261129020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, did you go to &ldquo;special&rdquo; school? Stuff isn&rsquo;t absolute. It&rsquo;s <em>relative</em>.</p><p>A blue whale may be a huge animal, compared to a mosquito.</p><p>But compared to a red(mond) giant star, its mass is not even noteworthy.</p><p>Watch Windows run on a SmartCard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , did you go to    special    school ?
Stuff isn    t absolute .
It    s relative.A blue whale may be a huge animal , compared to a mosquito.But compared to a red ( mond ) giant star , its mass is not even noteworthy.Watch Windows run on a SmartCard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, did you go to “special” school?
Stuff isn’t absolute.
It’s relative.A blue whale may be a huge animal, compared to a mosquito.But compared to a red(mond) giant star, its mass is not even noteworthy.Watch Windows run on a SmartCard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30540202</id>
	<title>Re:It's a Free Market</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259757900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is ridiculous.  Who do they plan to get to write games?  Or test them?  Have you seen the MS dev groups?  They need to be carried around on busses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is ridiculous .
Who do they plan to get to write games ?
Or test them ?
Have you seen the MS dev groups ?
They need to be carried around on busses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is ridiculous.
Who do they plan to get to write games?
Or test them?
Have you seen the MS dev groups?
They need to be carried around on busses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492812</id>
	<title>Re:It's a Free Market</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly.  Maybe Microsoft will learn that this is a fool's errand once their video game sales plummet after the public's negative reaction to this ridiculous attempt to revolutionize the gaming community.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
Maybe Microsoft will learn that this is a fool 's errand once their video game sales plummet after the public 's negative reaction to this ridiculous attempt to revolutionize the gaming community .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
Maybe Microsoft will learn that this is a fool's errand once their video game sales plummet after the public's negative reaction to this ridiculous attempt to revolutionize the gaming community.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491894</id>
	<title>Double-take</title>
	<author>HikingStick</author>
	<datestamp>1261169280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I really had to stop for a minute and double-check the posting date.  I thought that I certainly would see an April 1 designation somewhere.  This is just too sad.  Now we not only have nanny states, but we also will have nanny softare companies.<br> <br>

<b>Logon Process</b> <br> <br>
1. Press Ctrl+Alt+Del<br> <br>
2. Enter Logon ID and password<br> <br>
3. Step on the scale<br> <br>
4. If weigh is a healthy value, process logon; if not, recommend a gym membership (all in the name of keeping employer-paid health insurance costs down).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really had to stop for a minute and double-check the posting date .
I thought that I certainly would see an April 1 designation somewhere .
This is just too sad .
Now we not only have nanny states , but we also will have nanny softare companies .
Logon Process 1 .
Press Ctrl + Alt + Del 2 .
Enter Logon ID and password 3 .
Step on the scale 4 .
If weigh is a healthy value , process logon ; if not , recommend a gym membership ( all in the name of keeping employer-paid health insurance costs down ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really had to stop for a minute and double-check the posting date.
I thought that I certainly would see an April 1 designation somewhere.
This is just too sad.
Now we not only have nanny states, but we also will have nanny softare companies.
Logon Process  
1.
Press Ctrl+Alt+Del 
2.
Enter Logon ID and password 
3.
Step on the scale 
4.
If weigh is a healthy value, process logon; if not, recommend a gym membership (all in the name of keeping employer-paid health insurance costs down).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492666</id>
	<title>While we're at it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd like to patent some clever adjectives that could be used to describe said persons in a manner that may stimulate self improvement.  These creative original words may include:  "lard butt", "tubbo," and "fat bastard."</p><p>Moreover, I will use invasive marketing techniques to discover who is and is not a "fat bastard," and if they are, all their login requirements and profile names must be changed to something of the form fat\_bastardXXX where XXX is a number assigned to them.</p><p>Why will I do this, you ask?  Simply because I want to help all you poor fat bastards out there, even though I know that 90\% of my users are fat bastards...you must be eliminated.</p><p>Next up, patenting gas chambers...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to patent some clever adjectives that could be used to describe said persons in a manner that may stimulate self improvement .
These creative original words may include : " lard butt " , " tubbo , " and " fat bastard .
" Moreover , I will use invasive marketing techniques to discover who is and is not a " fat bastard , " and if they are , all their login requirements and profile names must be changed to something of the form fat \ _bastardXXX where XXX is a number assigned to them.Why will I do this , you ask ?
Simply because I want to help all you poor fat bastards out there , even though I know that 90 \ % of my users are fat bastards...you must be eliminated.Next up , patenting gas chambers.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to patent some clever adjectives that could be used to describe said persons in a manner that may stimulate self improvement.
These creative original words may include:  "lard butt", "tubbo," and "fat bastard.
"Moreover, I will use invasive marketing techniques to discover who is and is not a "fat bastard," and if they are, all their login requirements and profile names must be changed to something of the form fat\_bastardXXX where XXX is a number assigned to them.Why will I do this, you ask?
Simply because I want to help all you poor fat bastards out there, even though I know that 90\% of my users are fat bastards...you must be eliminated.Next up, patenting gas chambers...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496854</id>
	<title>Re:You want to patent something useful...</title>
	<author>hallmike</author>
	<datestamp>1261162500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They will be able to see whether it's really you by spying on you through your Project Natal Camera</htmltext>
<tokenext>They will be able to see whether it 's really you by spying on you through your Project Natal Camera</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They will be able to see whether it's really you by spying on you through your Project Natal Camera</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30503150</id>
	<title>Re:*cough* HIPAA</title>
	<author>rtechie</author>
	<datestamp>1261311300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I disagree that he government is really "cracking down" on information leaks, the new rules certainly are being widely implemented.  What other posters have said is accurate, HIPAA is basically about protecting customer data from hackers by isolating it and formalizing the rules of transferring data. It's the last thing that's the most important, because the real risk is that shady businesses will try to gather and resell information. A lot of the supposed "leaks" have really involved selling information to the wrong people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I disagree that he government is really " cracking down " on information leaks , the new rules certainly are being widely implemented .
What other posters have said is accurate , HIPAA is basically about protecting customer data from hackers by isolating it and formalizing the rules of transferring data .
It 's the last thing that 's the most important , because the real risk is that shady businesses will try to gather and resell information .
A lot of the supposed " leaks " have really involved selling information to the wrong people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I disagree that he government is really "cracking down" on information leaks, the new rules certainly are being widely implemented.
What other posters have said is accurate, HIPAA is basically about protecting customer data from hackers by isolating it and formalizing the rules of transferring data.
It's the last thing that's the most important, because the real risk is that shady businesses will try to gather and resell information.
A lot of the supposed "leaks" have really involved selling information to the wrong people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492874</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492662</id>
	<title>Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Corporations own the government...so......</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Corporations own the government...so..... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Corporations own the government...so......</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493032</id>
	<title>Re:From TFA:</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1261130220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suspect preemptive HIPAA lawsuits will be filed about 1 femtosecond after this patent gets approved, years before any such product could go to market.</p><p>I can't see any benefit to a device like this, unless someone is trying to make a "virtual gym" or something, in which case I'll join a real gym.  That way no one has access to my medical records.  As a bonus, if I overdo it and go to code blue or something, there are actual people around to call an ambulance and administer first aid.</p><p>Unless they have plans to integrate a defib into the game controller.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect preemptive HIPAA lawsuits will be filed about 1 femtosecond after this patent gets approved , years before any such product could go to market.I ca n't see any benefit to a device like this , unless someone is trying to make a " virtual gym " or something , in which case I 'll join a real gym .
That way no one has access to my medical records .
As a bonus , if I overdo it and go to code blue or something , there are actual people around to call an ambulance and administer first aid.Unless they have plans to integrate a defib into the game controller .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect preemptive HIPAA lawsuits will be filed about 1 femtosecond after this patent gets approved, years before any such product could go to market.I can't see any benefit to a device like this, unless someone is trying to make a "virtual gym" or something, in which case I'll join a real gym.
That way no one has access to my medical records.
As a bonus, if I overdo it and go to code blue or something, there are actual people around to call an ambulance and administer first aid.Unless they have plans to integrate a defib into the game controller.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493124</id>
	<title>Good grief people</title>
	<author>MrTester</author>
	<datestamp>1261130640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love it when people can only talk in extremes.<br>Microsoft wants to patent this technology.  So CLEARLY they will immediately use it for every application.<br>CLEARLY they are just going to randomly access hospital records without getting any authorization.<br>Come on folks.  Get a clue.</p><p>Someone at Microsoft (or one of their competitors withi a leak) has an idea for some sort of socially interactive physical fitness gaming network to compete with the Wii Fit.  They dont want 450 lb Slashdoters having hearattacks while they try to "get in shape" by doing 3 situps, so they want to allow for sensors to see what sort of shape someone is in. (That gets them out of the lawsuit.)  Someone says "While we are doing that we should allow for other means of in getting baseline data like medical records, cause they might do this fomrally in a retirement home or something."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love it when people can only talk in extremes.Microsoft wants to patent this technology .
So CLEARLY they will immediately use it for every application.CLEARLY they are just going to randomly access hospital records without getting any authorization.Come on folks .
Get a clue.Someone at Microsoft ( or one of their competitors withi a leak ) has an idea for some sort of socially interactive physical fitness gaming network to compete with the Wii Fit .
They dont want 450 lb Slashdoters having hearattacks while they try to " get in shape " by doing 3 situps , so they want to allow for sensors to see what sort of shape someone is in .
( That gets them out of the lawsuit .
) Someone says " While we are doing that we should allow for other means of in getting baseline data like medical records , cause they might do this fomrally in a retirement home or something .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love it when people can only talk in extremes.Microsoft wants to patent this technology.
So CLEARLY they will immediately use it for every application.CLEARLY they are just going to randomly access hospital records without getting any authorization.Come on folks.
Get a clue.Someone at Microsoft (or one of their competitors withi a leak) has an idea for some sort of socially interactive physical fitness gaming network to compete with the Wii Fit.
They dont want 450 lb Slashdoters having hearattacks while they try to "get in shape" by doing 3 situps, so they want to allow for sensors to see what sort of shape someone is in.
(That gets them out of the lawsuit.
)  Someone says "While we are doing that we should allow for other means of in getting baseline data like medical records, cause they might do this fomrally in a retirement home or something.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492686</id>
	<title>What about the sick and handicapped?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know a guy who's been a quadriplegic, with limited upper body function, since a stupid motorcycle accident. Playing games using a special controller is one way he passes the time. Will he get a pass? Or will he be put in a motorized wheelchair in the game too? What about people getting chemo? Amputees? Will kids be made short? Will the elderly be given bad knees? Etc.?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know a guy who 's been a quadriplegic , with limited upper body function , since a stupid motorcycle accident .
Playing games using a special controller is one way he passes the time .
Will he get a pass ?
Or will he be put in a motorized wheelchair in the game too ?
What about people getting chemo ?
Amputees ? Will kids be made short ?
Will the elderly be given bad knees ?
Etc. ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know a guy who's been a quadriplegic, with limited upper body function, since a stupid motorcycle accident.
Playing games using a special controller is one way he passes the time.
Will he get a pass?
Or will he be put in a motorized wheelchair in the game too?
What about people getting chemo?
Amputees? Will kids be made short?
Will the elderly be given bad knees?
Etc.?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491946</id>
	<title>Can I ?</title>
	<author>daveime</author>
	<datestamp>1261169400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can I be the first to heap scorn on the fat kid in the photo.</p><p>You fat bastard, you fat bastard, you ate all the pie !<br>(And a bucket of chicken too by the look of it).</p><p>Why do people allow their kids to turn into such bloaters ? And don't give me any of that "oh it's genetic crap". There is no DNA strand that codes for "being a fat little piggy who Mommy overfeeds in the hope you'll amount to something more than your Father when you grow up".</p><p>I blame Mario<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... come on, he eats pizza all day and has a right paunch on him too<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... what kind of a roll model is that ? (Note the deliberate misspelling of roll, thats a pune or play on words, that is). And Sonic too, I mean he was so fat, after 5 seconds of running he starting rolling head over heels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I be the first to heap scorn on the fat kid in the photo.You fat bastard , you fat bastard , you ate all the pie !
( And a bucket of chicken too by the look of it ) .Why do people allow their kids to turn into such bloaters ?
And do n't give me any of that " oh it 's genetic crap " .
There is no DNA strand that codes for " being a fat little piggy who Mommy overfeeds in the hope you 'll amount to something more than your Father when you grow up " .I blame Mario ... come on , he eats pizza all day and has a right paunch on him too ... what kind of a roll model is that ?
( Note the deliberate misspelling of roll , thats a pune or play on words , that is ) .
And Sonic too , I mean he was so fat , after 5 seconds of running he starting rolling head over heels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I be the first to heap scorn on the fat kid in the photo.You fat bastard, you fat bastard, you ate all the pie !
(And a bucket of chicken too by the look of it).Why do people allow their kids to turn into such bloaters ?
And don't give me any of that "oh it's genetic crap".
There is no DNA strand that codes for "being a fat little piggy who Mommy overfeeds in the hope you'll amount to something more than your Father when you grow up".I blame Mario ... come on, he eats pizza all day and has a right paunch on him too ... what kind of a roll model is that ?
(Note the deliberate misspelling of roll, thats a pune or play on words, that is).
And Sonic too, I mean he was so fat, after 5 seconds of running he starting rolling head over heels.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491664</id>
	<title>What next?</title>
	<author>Khris</author>
	<datestamp>1261168500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about patenting a system to prevent people from supporting the Jonas Brothers!  Now that one would make millions!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about patenting a system to prevent people from supporting the Jonas Brothers !
Now that one would make millions !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about patenting a system to prevent people from supporting the Jonas Brothers!
Now that one would make millions!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493994</id>
	<title>Re:You think this doesn't effect you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261134780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It&rsquo;s okay... you can fool it with a picture of a vagina.</p></div></blockquote><p>Oh, that'll fool it all right...into thinking you're a Mac user.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It    s okay... you can fool it with a picture of a vagina.Oh , that 'll fool it all right...into thinking you 're a Mac user .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It’s okay... you can fool it with a picture of a vagina.Oh, that'll fool it all right...into thinking you're a Mac user.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494150</id>
	<title>calling the kettle black</title>
	<author>slick7</author>
	<datestamp>1261135620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a better idea. Have everybody wear a yellow star and call them JUDE! A lame ass corporation that dictates appearance has no business being in business.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a better idea .
Have everybody wear a yellow star and call them JUDE !
A lame ass corporation that dictates appearance has no business being in business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a better idea.
Have everybody wear a yellow star and call them JUDE!
A lame ass corporation that dictates appearance has no business being in business.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30514206</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261420980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So THAT's why we're going to have digital medical records...</p></div><p>SO my avatar in the games will be a stoopid fat redneck that smokes and tells racist jokes to much? How awesome is that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So THAT 's why we 're going to have digital medical records...SO my avatar in the games will be a stoopid fat redneck that smokes and tells racist jokes to much ?
How awesome is that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So THAT's why we're going to have digital medical records...SO my avatar in the games will be a stoopid fat redneck that smokes and tells racist jokes to much?
How awesome is that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492296</id>
	<title>Re:And presumably all this will be done....</title>
	<author>electricbern</author>
	<datestamp>1261127460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They'll be packaging the newer versions of the Windows OS on barrels instead of boxes. All for the good of mankind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll be packaging the newer versions of the Windows OS on barrels instead of boxes .
All for the good of mankind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll be packaging the newer versions of the Windows OS on barrels instead of boxes.
All for the good of mankind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491674</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>nametaken</author>
	<datestamp>1261168560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wouldn't piss off <i>this</i> fat kid... he has a power glove AND a Max controller. TURBO'S, FTW!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't piss off this fat kid... he has a power glove AND a Max controller .
TURBO 'S , FTW !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't piss off this fat kid... he has a power glove AND a Max controller.
TURBO'S, FTW!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491856</id>
	<title>New CEO?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This patent business seems an overly complicated way to get rid of Steve Ballmer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This patent business seems an overly complicated way to get rid of Steve Ballmer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This patent business seems an overly complicated way to get rid of Steve Ballmer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494728</id>
	<title>Yet Another Patent</title>
	<author>flyneye</author>
	<datestamp>1261138860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll take out a patent on Avatar with underdeveloped genitalia so whenever someone from microsoft uses an avatar they'll have to pay me.<br>This will double in cost for any three letter executives who will have dickless avatars.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll take out a patent on Avatar with underdeveloped genitalia so whenever someone from microsoft uses an avatar they 'll have to pay me.This will double in cost for any three letter executives who will have dickless avatars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll take out a patent on Avatar with underdeveloped genitalia so whenever someone from microsoft uses an avatar they'll have to pay me.This will double in cost for any three letter executives who will have dickless avatars.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496964</id>
	<title>Re:You want to patent something useful...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261164420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What and keep fat chicks from using myspace angles on their dating profiles? How would they trick me in to a first date then?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What and keep fat chicks from using myspace angles on their dating profiles ?
How would they trick me in to a first date then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What and keep fat chicks from using myspace angles on their dating profiles?
How would they trick me in to a first date then?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492192</id>
	<title>Oh sure its ok for Corporations...</title>
	<author>bjcopeland</author>
	<datestamp>1261127100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the government did this, it would be called "Socialism". I guess its ok for Corporations to do this sort of thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the government did this , it would be called " Socialism " .
I guess its ok for Corporations to do this sort of thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the government did this, it would be called "Socialism".
I guess its ok for Corporations to do this sort of thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492398</id>
	<title>Can't Stop The FAT</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So What, doesn't stop the people who share their account or hire other players to keep their characters leveling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So What , does n't stop the people who share their account or hire other players to keep their characters leveling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So What, doesn't stop the people who share their account or hire other players to keep their characters leveling.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494198</id>
	<title>Re:Digital medical records</title>
	<author>agentc0re</author>
	<datestamp>1261135860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So THAT's why we're going to have <b>electronic</b> medical records...</p></div><p>There fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So THAT 's why we 're going to have electronic medical records...There fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So THAT's why we're going to have electronic medical records...There fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495094</id>
	<title>Re:From TFA:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261141500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"The physiological data can be gleaned from a third party health data collection repository"</p><p>As someone who worked in the healthcare industry for a number of years, this seems like a HIPAA violation lawsuit waiting to happen.</p></div><p>No it's not, the third party health data collector is probably part of something called project Natal<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The physiological data can be gleaned from a third party health data collection repository " As someone who worked in the healthcare industry for a number of years , this seems like a HIPAA violation lawsuit waiting to happen.No it 's not , the third party health data collector is probably part of something called project Natal ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The physiological data can be gleaned from a third party health data collection repository"As someone who worked in the healthcare industry for a number of years, this seems like a HIPAA violation lawsuit waiting to happen.No it's not, the third party health data collector is probably part of something called project Natal ;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493310</id>
	<title>Re:You think this doesn't effect you</title>
	<author>alan\_dershowitz</author>
	<datestamp>1261131420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where am I going to find one of those???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where am I going to find one of those ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where am I going to find one of those??
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694</id>
	<title>And presumably all this will be done....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...on a fantastically lean, mean &amp; slim Microsoft Windows OS?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...on a fantastically lean , mean &amp; slim Microsoft Windows OS ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...on a fantastically lean, mean &amp; slim Microsoft Windows OS?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494476</id>
	<title>Re:Pot, kettle, black.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261137300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Waddle?  Those weren't Microsoft employees, those were penguin infiltrators.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Waddle ?
Those were n't Microsoft employees , those were penguin infiltrators .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Waddle?
Those weren't Microsoft employees, those were penguin infiltrators.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494298</id>
	<title>Re:You think this doesn't effect you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261136400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where the hell would I find one of those on the internet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where the hell would I find one of those on the internet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where the hell would I find one of those on the internet?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493666</id>
	<title>Re:Brilliant</title>
	<author>quadelirus</author>
	<datestamp>1261132980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you really think that this is what its about? MS isn't stupid. They are out to make money and they aren't looking to heap shame on their users. They will probably end up marketing it as "your xbox the accountability partner" which will create rewards for meeting exercise goals. It seems a mountain is being made out of this molehill.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really think that this is what its about ?
MS is n't stupid .
They are out to make money and they are n't looking to heap shame on their users .
They will probably end up marketing it as " your xbox the accountability partner " which will create rewards for meeting exercise goals .
It seems a mountain is being made out of this molehill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really think that this is what its about?
MS isn't stupid.
They are out to make money and they aren't looking to heap shame on their users.
They will probably end up marketing it as "your xbox the accountability partner" which will create rewards for meeting exercise goals.
It seems a mountain is being made out of this molehill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492168</id>
	<title>This just went over my capability in digesting</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1261127040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the evilness of this corporation. my evil quota is full. now, we have seen a lot of horrible moves by microsoft, but i mean this ?!?!</p><p>they could just go all out from their seattle hq wearing postals and start kicking fat individuals in the face, saving a lot of effort and budget in the process and patent office's time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the evilness of this corporation .
my evil quota is full .
now , we have seen a lot of horrible moves by microsoft , but i mean this ? ! ?
! they could just go all out from their seattle hq wearing postals and start kicking fat individuals in the face , saving a lot of effort and budget in the process and patent office 's time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the evilness of this corporation.
my evil quota is full.
now, we have seen a lot of horrible moves by microsoft, but i mean this ?!?
!they could just go all out from their seattle hq wearing postals and start kicking fat individuals in the face, saving a lot of effort and budget in the process and patent office's time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494578</id>
	<title>Re:WTF???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261137960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Wii Fit just weighs you and shapes your avatar accordingly.</p><p>Still, some of the other ideas sound like they could be amusing. How would the game vary by religion for example? Would my character be attacked by a 10 headed monster while yours is attacked by someone with horns and tail?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Wii Fit just weighs you and shapes your avatar accordingly.Still , some of the other ideas sound like they could be amusing .
How would the game vary by religion for example ?
Would my character be attacked by a 10 headed monster while yours is attacked by someone with horns and tail ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Wii Fit just weighs you and shapes your avatar accordingly.Still, some of the other ideas sound like they could be amusing.
How would the game vary by religion for example?
Would my character be attacked by a 10 headed monster while yours is attacked by someone with horns and tail?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30500164</id>
	<title>This cannot be real.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261255380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this is indeed true, I will never buy another product from Microsoft again. This reeks of communism. People are too GD nosey these days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this is indeed true , I will never buy another product from Microsoft again .
This reeks of communism .
People are too GD nosey these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this is indeed true, I will never buy another product from Microsoft again.
This reeks of communism.
People are too GD nosey these days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497030</id>
	<title>hipslickncool</title>
	<author>hipslickncool</author>
	<datestamp>1261165080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like a lose, lose situation... I seems like the market strategists would see that this could really go all bad... Who are the majority that actually play video games? Most the people that I know that are big gamers really aren't in the best shape or they are our youth...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a lose , lose situation... I seems like the market strategists would see that this could really go all bad... Who are the majority that actually play video games ?
Most the people that I know that are big gamers really are n't in the best shape or they are our youth.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a lose, lose situation... I seems like the market strategists would see that this could really go all bad... Who are the majority that actually play video games?
Most the people that I know that are big gamers really aren't in the best shape or they are our youth...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30519856</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261411260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If I'm looking for women, I go to a supermarket,</p></div></blockquote><p>Wow, Walmart really does have everything</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I 'm looking for women , I go to a supermarket,Wow , Walmart really does have everything</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I'm looking for women, I go to a supermarket,Wow, Walmart really does have everything
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491872</id>
	<title>Ulterior motives?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone see any ulterior motives in trying to be some sort of a competition for the wii?  Wonder if they're thinking about limiting time for movies watched on the Xbox, etc...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone see any ulterior motives in trying to be some sort of a competition for the wii ?
Wonder if they 're thinking about limiting time for movies watched on the Xbox , etc.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone see any ulterior motives in trying to be some sort of a competition for the wii?
Wonder if they're thinking about limiting time for movies watched on the Xbox, etc...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493598</id>
	<title>HIPAA doesn't mean anything.</title>
	<author>jeko</author>
	<datestamp>1261132620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can anyone, anywhere, point out ONE time HIPAA was actually enforced beyond just a symbolic wrist-slap? Show me the company that was forced out of business, show me the CEO whose career was ended for HIPAA violations.</p><p>Every single one of my "health providers" -- doctors, dentists and optometrists -- make me sign paperwork saying they can share my information with anyone they want. I tried to decline signing that paperwork once at an optometrist for an eye exam I was paying for out of my pocket.</p><p>They kicked me out of the office.</p><p>HIPAA works a lot like the TSA. It's just done for show.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can anyone , anywhere , point out ONE time HIPAA was actually enforced beyond just a symbolic wrist-slap ?
Show me the company that was forced out of business , show me the CEO whose career was ended for HIPAA violations.Every single one of my " health providers " -- doctors , dentists and optometrists -- make me sign paperwork saying they can share my information with anyone they want .
I tried to decline signing that paperwork once at an optometrist for an eye exam I was paying for out of my pocket.They kicked me out of the office.HIPAA works a lot like the TSA .
It 's just done for show .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can anyone, anywhere, point out ONE time HIPAA was actually enforced beyond just a symbolic wrist-slap?
Show me the company that was forced out of business, show me the CEO whose career was ended for HIPAA violations.Every single one of my "health providers" -- doctors, dentists and optometrists -- make me sign paperwork saying they can share my information with anyone they want.
I tried to decline signing that paperwork once at an optometrist for an eye exam I was paying for out of my pocket.They kicked me out of the office.HIPAA works a lot like the TSA.
It's just done for show.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492940</id>
	<title>Re:Discrimination</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not like they're saying "you can't play fatty", it's just saying "hey fatty, what's up?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not like they 're saying " you ca n't play fatty " , it 's just saying " hey fatty , what 's up ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not like they're saying "you can't play fatty", it's just saying "hey fatty, what's up?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492870</id>
	<title>This has been my avatar</title>
	<author>JahnTheSavage</author>
	<datestamp>1261129560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>for the online community longer than I can remember, and I'll be damned if I'm going to let my reputation be squandered by the likes of Microsoft--especially in this case.</htmltext>
<tokenext>for the online community longer than I can remember , and I 'll be damned if I 'm going to let my reputation be squandered by the likes of Microsoft--especially in this case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for the online community longer than I can remember, and I'll be damned if I'm going to let my reputation be squandered by the likes of Microsoft--especially in this case.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494146</id>
	<title>Re:Brilliant</title>
	<author>WinterSolstice</author>
	<datestamp>1261135620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, I think DEC has that patent already... so I guess HP owns it now<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p><p>"Patent for a method of developing innovations that result in bankruptcy"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , I think DEC has that patent already... so I guess HP owns it now : D " Patent for a method of developing innovations that result in bankruptcy "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, I think DEC has that patent already... so I guess HP owns it now :D"Patent for a method of developing innovations that result in bankruptcy"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492108</id>
	<title>Re:WTF???</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1261169940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They Will Ask. And I will tell. Want to play CoD: MW3? Give me your Age for ratings verification.<br>Want to use Project Natal? Tell us your height and weight to help get more accurate rendering.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They Will Ask .
And I will tell .
Want to play CoD : MW3 ?
Give me your Age for ratings verification.Want to use Project Natal ?
Tell us your height and weight to help get more accurate rendering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They Will Ask.
And I will tell.
Want to play CoD: MW3?
Give me your Age for ratings verification.Want to use Project Natal?
Tell us your height and weight to help get more accurate rendering.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494300</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>mckinnsb</author>
	<datestamp>1261136460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean the reason why Europe has fewer fat people is because <i>europeans don't treat the obese like fucking monsters?</i> No way! Thats crazy talk. </p><p>
I have long believed that is the American obsession with image and sexuality that has <b>aggravated</b> the problem of obesity. Nearly every 'good' cure to obesity (omitting dangerous diet pills or starvation diets) involves social interaction of some kind. Lampooning people who suffer from obesity only furthers their isolation and in no way is productive towards recovery. </p><p>
I was an overweight, acne-ridden, isolated kid all through middle school - but it was the social interactions I made through multiplayer gaming on the internet (specifically, MUDS - yeah... mega dork) that gave me the confidence to approach people in real life (high school), and later lose weight with their encouragement (senior year). </p><p>
Also, isn't there a beauty to anonymity? Do we really need to see everyone's physical appearance to judge if we want to kill some mobs and grab some lootz with them? I personally would prefer not to. If I'm looking for women, I go to a supermarket, mall, or bar. On the net, my intent is otherwise focused, and I don't need to see what my digital comrade looks like to figure out if I'm having a good time playing my game. That much is usually implied.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean the reason why Europe has fewer fat people is because europeans do n't treat the obese like fucking monsters ?
No way !
Thats crazy talk .
I have long believed that is the American obsession with image and sexuality that has aggravated the problem of obesity .
Nearly every 'good ' cure to obesity ( omitting dangerous diet pills or starvation diets ) involves social interaction of some kind .
Lampooning people who suffer from obesity only furthers their isolation and in no way is productive towards recovery .
I was an overweight , acne-ridden , isolated kid all through middle school - but it was the social interactions I made through multiplayer gaming on the internet ( specifically , MUDS - yeah... mega dork ) that gave me the confidence to approach people in real life ( high school ) , and later lose weight with their encouragement ( senior year ) .
Also , is n't there a beauty to anonymity ?
Do we really need to see everyone 's physical appearance to judge if we want to kill some mobs and grab some lootz with them ?
I personally would prefer not to .
If I 'm looking for women , I go to a supermarket , mall , or bar .
On the net , my intent is otherwise focused , and I do n't need to see what my digital comrade looks like to figure out if I 'm having a good time playing my game .
That much is usually implied .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean the reason why Europe has fewer fat people is because europeans don't treat the obese like fucking monsters?
No way!
Thats crazy talk.
I have long believed that is the American obsession with image and sexuality that has aggravated the problem of obesity.
Nearly every 'good' cure to obesity (omitting dangerous diet pills or starvation diets) involves social interaction of some kind.
Lampooning people who suffer from obesity only furthers their isolation and in no way is productive towards recovery.
I was an overweight, acne-ridden, isolated kid all through middle school - but it was the social interactions I made through multiplayer gaming on the internet (specifically, MUDS - yeah... mega dork) that gave me the confidence to approach people in real life (high school), and later lose weight with their encouragement (senior year).
Also, isn't there a beauty to anonymity?
Do we really need to see everyone's physical appearance to judge if we want to kill some mobs and grab some lootz with them?
I personally would prefer not to.
If I'm looking for women, I go to a supermarket, mall, or bar.
On the net, my intent is otherwise focused, and I don't need to see what my digital comrade looks like to figure out if I'm having a good time playing my game.
That much is usually implied.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30498366</id>
	<title>Re:*cough* HIPAA</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1261236600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><strong>Well, I used Wii Fit to level up my rig </strong></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I used Wii Fit to level up my rig</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I used Wii Fit to level up my rig </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491790</id>
	<title>So they want discrimatory features into games...</title>
	<author>Yaa 101</author>
	<datestamp>1261168920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...How appalling</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...How appalling</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...How appalling</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494064</id>
	<title>Re:From TFA:</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1261135260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As someone who worked in the healthcare industry for a number of years, this seems like a HIPAA violation lawsuit waiting to happen.</p></div><p>The US isn't the only place that Microsoft does business. China, for example, has shown an interest in nannying its gamers. With some drift in a bad direction, some parts of the developed world including the US could be doing this sort of thing as well. Remember, it's not an HIPAA violation, if your application is excluded from the regulation by Congress.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As someone who worked in the healthcare industry for a number of years , this seems like a HIPAA violation lawsuit waiting to happen.The US is n't the only place that Microsoft does business .
China , for example , has shown an interest in nannying its gamers .
With some drift in a bad direction , some parts of the developed world including the US could be doing this sort of thing as well .
Remember , it 's not an HIPAA violation , if your application is excluded from the regulation by Congress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As someone who worked in the healthcare industry for a number of years, this seems like a HIPAA violation lawsuit waiting to happen.The US isn't the only place that Microsoft does business.
China, for example, has shown an interest in nannying its gamers.
With some drift in a bad direction, some parts of the developed world including the US could be doing this sort of thing as well.
Remember, it's not an HIPAA violation, if your application is excluded from the regulation by Congress.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497634</id>
	<title>Re:Its an american problem again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261222560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, we in the more enlightened UK do ridicule fat, thin, short sighted and generally different people.</p><p>But especially the fatties.</p><p><a href="http://www.macclads.co.uk/hectic\_house/lyrics/lyrics\_alpha/fatb.html" title="macclads.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.macclads.co.uk/hectic\_house/lyrics/lyrics\_alpha/fatb.html</a> [macclads.co.uk]</p><p>Also bear this in mind: the kebab shops (and therefore the majority of the fatties from the UK) are ALL YOUR FAULT!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , we in the more enlightened UK do ridicule fat , thin , short sighted and generally different people.But especially the fatties.http : //www.macclads.co.uk/hectic \ _house/lyrics/lyrics \ _alpha/fatb.html [ macclads.co.uk ] Also bear this in mind : the kebab shops ( and therefore the majority of the fatties from the UK ) are ALL YOUR FAULT ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, we in the more enlightened UK do ridicule fat, thin, short sighted and generally different people.But especially the fatties.http://www.macclads.co.uk/hectic\_house/lyrics/lyrics\_alpha/fatb.html [macclads.co.uk]Also bear this in mind: the kebab shops (and therefore the majority of the fatties from the UK) are ALL YOUR FAULT!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494300</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30540202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30519856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492892
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_128</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494578
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_131</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30528172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30503150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30518176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_126</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30504142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30501252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30498494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491910
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30504478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30511698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_129</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30512200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30498638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_132</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30527762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30512194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30591882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30507248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493598
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493658
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_127</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_130</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30498150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30501042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30500268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30514206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1649253_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497340
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491776
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492376
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492148
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492620
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30540202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496334
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492016
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494300
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30504478
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30519856
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30512194
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30500268
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493134
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30504142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30501252
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30528172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491982
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492896
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496780
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493332
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493310
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493484
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494298
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30498150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30498638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496590
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496854
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491968
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493660
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495038
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491800
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493624
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492018
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494482
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492548
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492830
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492874
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30503150
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494366
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495252
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494374
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495338
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493946
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496114
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493608
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30507248
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30498494
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30511698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30514206
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491944
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491928
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497180
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30591882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30527762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491980
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492616
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492496
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494806
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494784
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491910
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492040
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492518
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30518176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30496858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492814
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491674
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492290
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493246
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492838
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492092
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492386
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494146
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491958
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493356
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492676
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30493010
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30497438
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30495870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30494542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30492468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30512200
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1649253.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30491732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1649253.30501042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
