<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_18_1638232</id>
	<title>US McDonald's Wi-Fi Going Free In January</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1261156980000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Knowzy writes <i>"After five years behind a paywall, <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/184939/mcdonalds\_free\_wifi\_a\_nobrainer\_winwin.html">McDonalds plans to stop charging for its Wi-Fi</a> in mid-January in the US. According to the Dallas Morning News, you <a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/DN-att\_16bus.ART0.State.Edition1.3cf2217.html">aren't even required to make a purchase</a> &mdash; 'free is free,' a spokesman said. It's also been widely reported that they won't impose time limits on your surfing. With around 20,000 free hotspots between McDonald's and Starbucks (<a href="http://www.starbucks.com/aboutus/pressdesc.asp?id=826">who went free[ish]</a> earlier this year), anyone still charging for Wi-Fi is going to look foolish, if not downright greedy."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Knowzy writes " After five years behind a paywall , McDonalds plans to stop charging for its Wi-Fi in mid-January in the US .
According to the Dallas Morning News , you are n't even required to make a purchase    'free is free, ' a spokesman said .
It 's also been widely reported that they wo n't impose time limits on your surfing .
With around 20,000 free hotspots between McDonald 's and Starbucks ( who went free [ ish ] earlier this year ) , anyone still charging for Wi-Fi is going to look foolish , if not downright greedy .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knowzy writes "After five years behind a paywall, McDonalds plans to stop charging for its Wi-Fi in mid-January in the US.
According to the Dallas Morning News, you aren't even required to make a purchase — 'free is free,' a spokesman said.
It's also been widely reported that they won't impose time limits on your surfing.
With around 20,000 free hotspots between McDonald's and Starbucks (who went free[ish] earlier this year), anyone still charging for Wi-Fi is going to look foolish, if not downright greedy.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490080</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>nametaken</author>
	<datestamp>1261162680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It always seemed like McDonalds didn't want people to hang around anyway.  They've always had horribly uncomfortable seats, cramped seating areas, unsettling colors (per color theory if you believe that stuff), etc.  Even the PlayPlace ones seem mostly uninviting.</p><p>I always just assumed that they didn't actually want people hanging out.  "Get your burger and get the f* out".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It always seemed like McDonalds did n't want people to hang around anyway .
They 've always had horribly uncomfortable seats , cramped seating areas , unsettling colors ( per color theory if you believe that stuff ) , etc .
Even the PlayPlace ones seem mostly uninviting.I always just assumed that they did n't actually want people hanging out .
" Get your burger and get the f * out " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It always seemed like McDonalds didn't want people to hang around anyway.
They've always had horribly uncomfortable seats, cramped seating areas, unsettling colors (per color theory if you believe that stuff), etc.
Even the PlayPlace ones seem mostly uninviting.I always just assumed that they didn't actually want people hanging out.
"Get your burger and get the f* out".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489654</id>
	<title>Re:understanding is critical here</title>
	<author>ducomputergeek</author>
	<datestamp>1261161420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've never been in a St. Louis Bread Co. (same company as Panera) and charged for access.  They have a splash screen that you have to click "log-in" before you can get on and agree to their terms of service.  But that has never required a purchase.  Granted their web is useless for anything other than email and surfing to CNN and a few web sites as anything of interest seems to be block and they also seem to block ports like FTP/SSH starting a little over a year ago.</p><p>Coffee shop I'm setting at now requires you purchase a drink for 3 hours of internet time.  And has for years because it is a college town and it's a popular study hang out.  If you didn't you'd get people come in, sit down for 6 - 8 hours, and never buy anything.  Meanwhile paying customers are leaving and going somewhere else because there aren't any seats available.  (They had free wifi when they first opened.  And Free was costing them too much in lost revenue.  At least $150 - $200 a day.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never been in a St. Louis Bread Co. ( same company as Panera ) and charged for access .
They have a splash screen that you have to click " log-in " before you can get on and agree to their terms of service .
But that has never required a purchase .
Granted their web is useless for anything other than email and surfing to CNN and a few web sites as anything of interest seems to be block and they also seem to block ports like FTP/SSH starting a little over a year ago.Coffee shop I 'm setting at now requires you purchase a drink for 3 hours of internet time .
And has for years because it is a college town and it 's a popular study hang out .
If you did n't you 'd get people come in , sit down for 6 - 8 hours , and never buy anything .
Meanwhile paying customers are leaving and going somewhere else because there are n't any seats available .
( They had free wifi when they first opened .
And Free was costing them too much in lost revenue .
At least $ 150 - $ 200 a day .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never been in a St. Louis Bread Co. (same company as Panera) and charged for access.
They have a splash screen that you have to click "log-in" before you can get on and agree to their terms of service.
But that has never required a purchase.
Granted their web is useless for anything other than email and surfing to CNN and a few web sites as anything of interest seems to be block and they also seem to block ports like FTP/SSH starting a little over a year ago.Coffee shop I'm setting at now requires you purchase a drink for 3 hours of internet time.
And has for years because it is a college town and it's a popular study hang out.
If you didn't you'd get people come in, sit down for 6 - 8 hours, and never buy anything.
Meanwhile paying customers are leaving and going somewhere else because there aren't any seats available.
(They had free wifi when they first opened.
And Free was costing them too much in lost revenue.
At least $150 - $200 a day.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491122</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261166220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've seen crowded McD's in urban Europe, where they were looking to rotate customers as fast as possible, but here in the suburban US, McD's are mostly empty most of the time they operate.  People usually prefer drive-thru service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen crowded McD 's in urban Europe , where they were looking to rotate customers as fast as possible , but here in the suburban US , McD 's are mostly empty most of the time they operate .
People usually prefer drive-thru service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen crowded McD's in urban Europe, where they were looking to rotate customers as fast as possible, but here in the suburban US, McD's are mostly empty most of the time they operate.
People usually prefer drive-thru service.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491848</id>
	<title>Re:understanding is critical here</title>
	<author>LandDolphin</author>
	<datestamp>1261169100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, no real loss on Starbucks part if you don't go back.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , no real loss on Starbucks part if you do n't go back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, no real loss on Starbucks part if you don't go back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493374</id>
	<title>Re:might actually go to a mcdonalds</title>
	<author>kaatochacha</author>
	<datestamp>1261131660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Truly, I'm speechless.
My favorite line "So she wouldn't have to do the poo bag thing"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Truly , I 'm speechless .
My favorite line " So she would n't have to do the poo bag thing "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Truly, I'm speechless.
My favorite line "So she wouldn't have to do the poo bag thing"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490020</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>. . . Everytime I thought I'd be getting something that I actually wanted to eat at McDonalds, I'd have 5 cents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.
. .
Everytime I thought I 'd be getting something that I actually wanted to eat at McDonalds , I 'd have 5 cents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
. .
Everytime I thought I'd be getting something that I actually wanted to eat at McDonalds, I'd have 5 cents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492520</id>
	<title>Re:Expect bright lights</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So you're saying the solution to every problem is an ever increasing intensity of light?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 're saying the solution to every problem is an ever increasing intensity of light ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you're saying the solution to every problem is an ever increasing intensity of light?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490058</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>BisexualPuppy</author>
	<datestamp>1261162620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's free in France (at least it was 2 months ago). Coverage was quite bad in the 3 or 4 places I tested it, thought, due to the access point(s) always being far from the doors. But it was usable at ~20m  outside the 'restaurant'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's free in France ( at least it was 2 months ago ) .
Coverage was quite bad in the 3 or 4 places I tested it , thought , due to the access point ( s ) always being far from the doors .
But it was usable at ~ 20m outside the 'restaurant' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's free in France (at least it was 2 months ago).
Coverage was quite bad in the 3 or 4 places I tested it, thought, due to the access point(s) always being far from the doors.
But it was usable at ~20m  outside the 'restaurant'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495134</id>
	<title>You pay for wifi @ McDonalds in the US?</title>
	<author>epp\_b</author>
	<datestamp>1261141860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even in the little Canadian hick-town where I live, McDonalds' wifi access is free.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even in the little Canadian hick-town where I live , McDonalds ' wifi access is free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even in the little Canadian hick-town where I live, McDonalds' wifi access is free.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494090</id>
	<title>Re:understanding is critical here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261135320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Haha. Little do you know wi-fi at Panera has always been free. Always marketed as free, yes they did market it that way. If you notice they have "message" menu panels and up to 6-months ago for the last 3 years it was all about free wifi. And no you don't have to buy a single thing.</p><p>So your basically complaining that you don't like free internet access that is on the slow side... that gives free access to 100+ people a day per cafe?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Haha .
Little do you know wi-fi at Panera has always been free .
Always marketed as free , yes they did market it that way .
If you notice they have " message " menu panels and up to 6-months ago for the last 3 years it was all about free wifi .
And no you do n't have to buy a single thing.So your basically complaining that you do n't like free internet access that is on the slow side... that gives free access to 100 + people a day per cafe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haha.
Little do you know wi-fi at Panera has always been free.
Always marketed as free, yes they did market it that way.
If you notice they have "message" menu panels and up to 6-months ago for the last 3 years it was all about free wifi.
And no you don't have to buy a single thing.So your basically complaining that you don't like free internet access that is on the slow side... that gives free access to 100+ people a day per cafe?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492452</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chai is flavored tea. Try it some time, you won't magically start listening to NPR or anything. Mocha is not even in the same category of beverage. And nobody outside of Guantanamo Bay has had to drink a mixture of the two with mint added.</p><p>Yeah, I know, it was a joke. It's an old joke. It's so old that it's now used in place of the Rosetta stone to decipher dead languages.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chai is flavored tea .
Try it some time , you wo n't magically start listening to NPR or anything .
Mocha is not even in the same category of beverage .
And nobody outside of Guantanamo Bay has had to drink a mixture of the two with mint added.Yeah , I know , it was a joke .
It 's an old joke .
It 's so old that it 's now used in place of the Rosetta stone to decipher dead languages .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chai is flavored tea.
Try it some time, you won't magically start listening to NPR or anything.
Mocha is not even in the same category of beverage.
And nobody outside of Guantanamo Bay has had to drink a mixture of the two with mint added.Yeah, I know, it was a joke.
It's an old joke.
It's so old that it's now used in place of the Rosetta stone to decipher dead languages.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493974</id>
	<title>Sad but true.</title>
	<author>formfeed</author>
	<datestamp>1261134600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have had ATT-Dsl for 4 years now. With it comes "free" ATT-wifi at every McDonalds. But  I haven't stopped once at a McDonalds to use their wifi.
<p>
When traveling, I usually stop at a Panera, where I can pretend to enjoy the coffee (free refills till you shake), pretend that I like the better bread, pretend that I like the general relaxing atmosphere. </p><p>

Gosh, I am so pretentious. But I have to admit, that if I had any desire to feel like an important reporter covering a war, typing in the story in hostile territory, while constantly under the threat, that someone might be throwing something at you, I would for sure prefer to sit at a McDonalds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have had ATT-Dsl for 4 years now .
With it comes " free " ATT-wifi at every McDonalds .
But I have n't stopped once at a McDonalds to use their wifi .
When traveling , I usually stop at a Panera , where I can pretend to enjoy the coffee ( free refills till you shake ) , pretend that I like the better bread , pretend that I like the general relaxing atmosphere .
Gosh , I am so pretentious .
But I have to admit , that if I had any desire to feel like an important reporter covering a war , typing in the story in hostile territory , while constantly under the threat , that someone might be throwing something at you , I would for sure prefer to sit at a McDonalds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have had ATT-Dsl for 4 years now.
With it comes "free" ATT-wifi at every McDonalds.
But  I haven't stopped once at a McDonalds to use their wifi.
When traveling, I usually stop at a Panera, where I can pretend to enjoy the coffee (free refills till you shake), pretend that I like the better bread, pretend that I like the general relaxing atmosphere.
Gosh, I am so pretentious.
But I have to admit, that if I had any desire to feel like an important reporter covering a war, typing in the story in hostile territory, while constantly under the threat, that someone might be throwing something at you, I would for sure prefer to sit at a McDonalds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493642</id>
	<title>Re:Starbucks free?</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1261132860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have to register for the Starbucks loyalty card. Once you have a card, wifi is free. (You also get free drip coffee refills, and some other perks.) IIRC, the card is free but you have to make at least one purchase before you can use the wifi.</p><p>Anyway, it's "mostly free".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have to register for the Starbucks loyalty card .
Once you have a card , wifi is free .
( You also get free drip coffee refills , and some other perks .
) IIRC , the card is free but you have to make at least one purchase before you can use the wifi.Anyway , it 's " mostly free " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have to register for the Starbucks loyalty card.
Once you have a card, wifi is free.
(You also get free drip coffee refills, and some other perks.
) IIRC, the card is free but you have to make at least one purchase before you can use the wifi.Anyway, it's "mostly free".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491018</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>irenaeous</author>
	<datestamp>1261165860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Man, If I had a nickle...For everytime I wished I had Wifi when I was at McDonalds... I'd have the exact same amount of money I do now.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>I will be accumulating a few nickles I think.  I am often on call and far from home.  Also, I have young children who are sometimes with me.  So, if I get a call I can  go to a nearby McDonalds -- they are perhaps more ubiquitous than Star Bucks -- and let the young ones play in the play area while I VPN to my work -- that will be great.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , If I had a nickle...For everytime I wished I had Wifi when I was at McDonalds... I 'd have the exact same amount of money I do now .
I will be accumulating a few nickles I think .
I am often on call and far from home .
Also , I have young children who are sometimes with me .
So , if I get a call I can go to a nearby McDonalds -- they are perhaps more ubiquitous than Star Bucks -- and let the young ones play in the play area while I VPN to my work -- that will be great .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, If I had a nickle...For everytime I wished I had Wifi when I was at McDonalds... I'd have the exact same amount of money I do now.
I will be accumulating a few nickles I think.
I am often on call and far from home.
Also, I have young children who are sometimes with me.
So, if I get a call I can  go to a nearby McDonalds -- they are perhaps more ubiquitous than Star Bucks -- and let the young ones play in the play area while I VPN to my work -- that will be great.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495154</id>
	<title>Re:It's the expensive places that still charge for</title>
	<author>DwySteve</author>
	<datestamp>1261142040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's the effect of having most of your clients be business travelers.  If they can expense it, chances are they'll buy it.  So if they need WiFi to do work, they just charge it and the company pays for it.  Companies don't care, so the hotels win.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the effect of having most of your clients be business travelers .
If they can expense it , chances are they 'll buy it .
So if they need WiFi to do work , they just charge it and the company pays for it .
Companies do n't care , so the hotels win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the effect of having most of your clients be business travelers.
If they can expense it, chances are they'll buy it.
So if they need WiFi to do work, they just charge it and the company pays for it.
Companies don't care, so the hotels win.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442</id>
	<title>Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261160700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Free wifi won't make me eat a fried burger.</p><p>Flame Broiled, or nothing.</p><p>-JJS</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Free wifi wo n't make me eat a fried burger.Flame Broiled , or nothing.-JJS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free wifi won't make me eat a fried burger.Flame Broiled, or nothing.-JJS</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491954</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>Jawn98685</author>
	<datestamp>1261169460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You must be referring to a McD's that never went to frozen fries. Once upon a time, McD's fries were prepared fresh, from real potatoes, in the restaurant. <i>Those</i> were some good French fries. <br>Now get off my lawn.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be referring to a McD 's that never went to frozen fries .
Once upon a time , McD 's fries were prepared fresh , from real potatoes , in the restaurant .
Those were some good French fries .
Now get off my lawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be referring to a McD's that never went to frozen fries.
Once upon a time, McD's fries were prepared fresh, from real potatoes, in the restaurant.
Those were some good French fries.
Now get off my lawn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491860</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1261169160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're just acclimated. Their fries suck. You want good fries? Buy some potatos and some cooking oil, slice the potatos (leave the skins on, that's where most of the vitamins are) and fry 'em. Puts McDonald's AND Burger King to shame (even though Burger King has better fries AND burgers).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're just acclimated .
Their fries suck .
You want good fries ?
Buy some potatos and some cooking oil , slice the potatos ( leave the skins on , that 's where most of the vitamins are ) and fry 'em .
Puts McDonald 's AND Burger King to shame ( even though Burger King has better fries AND burgers ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're just acclimated.
Their fries suck.
You want good fries?
Buy some potatos and some cooking oil, slice the potatos (leave the skins on, that's where most of the vitamins are) and fry 'em.
Puts McDonald's AND Burger King to shame (even though Burger King has better fries AND burgers).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491476</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1261167720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Japanese girls going to the language schools seem to love McDonalds wifi. They're the only reason to walk into a McDonalds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Japanese girls going to the language schools seem to love McDonalds wifi .
They 're the only reason to walk into a McDonalds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Japanese girls going to the language schools seem to love McDonalds wifi.
They're the only reason to walk into a McDonalds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489558</id>
	<title>No Purchase Required?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261161120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps to use the wifi, but you cant sit in the building or on the lot unless you bought something. " parking for customers only"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps to use the wifi , but you cant sit in the building or on the lot unless you bought something .
" parking for customers only "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps to use the wifi, but you cant sit in the building or on the lot unless you bought something.
" parking for customers only"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490436</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>FuzzyHead</author>
	<datestamp>1261163820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The parent must remember that McDonald's caters to a different class than Starbucks. Those people at McDonald's will pretend to be a amateur blogger, while pompously talking to other "amateur bloggers".</p><p>Remember this is McDonald's, if they were real bloggers, they'd be at Starbucks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The parent must remember that McDonald 's caters to a different class than Starbucks .
Those people at McDonald 's will pretend to be a amateur blogger , while pompously talking to other " amateur bloggers " .Remember this is McDonald 's , if they were real bloggers , they 'd be at Starbucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The parent must remember that McDonald's caters to a different class than Starbucks.
Those people at McDonald's will pretend to be a amateur blogger, while pompously talking to other "amateur bloggers".Remember this is McDonald's, if they were real bloggers, they'd be at Starbucks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490650</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>smooth wombat</author>
	<datestamp>1261164540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><em>while I wait for slow eaters in the family to finish eating.</em>

<br> <br>

I would be characterized as a slow eater and if that annoys you, tough.  Eating a meal is one of the few times one has during the day to relax and take your time.  Granted, McD's can't quite be called a good meal, but regardless, eating a meal slowly is a surefire way not to eat too much and not get fat.

<br> <br>

People talk about living life to the fullest, how about enjoying it for once.</htmltext>
<tokenext>while I wait for slow eaters in the family to finish eating .
I would be characterized as a slow eater and if that annoys you , tough .
Eating a meal is one of the few times one has during the day to relax and take your time .
Granted , McD 's ca n't quite be called a good meal , but regardless , eating a meal slowly is a surefire way not to eat too much and not get fat .
People talk about living life to the fullest , how about enjoying it for once .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>while I wait for slow eaters in the family to finish eating.
I would be characterized as a slow eater and if that annoys you, tough.
Eating a meal is one of the few times one has during the day to relax and take your time.
Granted, McD's can't quite be called a good meal, but regardless, eating a meal slowly is a surefire way not to eat too much and not get fat.
People talk about living life to the fullest, how about enjoying it for once.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489568</id>
	<title>Starbucks free?</title>
	<author>kharchenko</author>
	<datestamp>1261161120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me, or free wifi from Starbucks is just some wishful thinking? I've traveled to San Deigo, Denver and Boston in the past week and tried on several occasions to get wifi signal. And in each case, Starbucks was requiring me to pay. I don't know why I thought it was free<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... may be it was trumpeted in some earlier slashdot article?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or free wifi from Starbucks is just some wishful thinking ?
I 've traveled to San Deigo , Denver and Boston in the past week and tried on several occasions to get wifi signal .
And in each case , Starbucks was requiring me to pay .
I do n't know why I thought it was free ... may be it was trumpeted in some earlier slashdot article ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or free wifi from Starbucks is just some wishful thinking?
I've traveled to San Deigo, Denver and Boston in the past week and tried on several occasions to get wifi signal.
And in each case, Starbucks was requiring me to pay.
I don't know why I thought it was free ... may be it was trumpeted in some earlier slashdot article?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494404</id>
	<title>Re:It's the expensive places that still charge for</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261136880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you are right. It's only a matter of time before free WiFi access becomes obsolete. In my country it costs $12/month for 6 Mbit/s internet connection through the cell phone or $6/month for 0,3 Mbit/s. It's only when travelling by train that I find it useful to have WiFi since the cell phone may loose the connection in some places.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you are right .
It 's only a matter of time before free WiFi access becomes obsolete .
In my country it costs $ 12/month for 6 Mbit/s internet connection through the cell phone or $ 6/month for 0,3 Mbit/s .
It 's only when travelling by train that I find it useful to have WiFi since the cell phone may loose the connection in some places .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you are right.
It's only a matter of time before free WiFi access becomes obsolete.
In my country it costs $12/month for 6 Mbit/s internet connection through the cell phone or $6/month for 0,3 Mbit/s.
It's only when travelling by train that I find it useful to have WiFi since the cell phone may loose the connection in some places.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494910</id>
	<title>Back in my day...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261140000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Back in my day people went to an eatery to eat. Damn that must have been so long ago, probably like last century or something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Back in my day people went to an eatery to eat .
Damn that must have been so long ago , probably like last century or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back in my day people went to an eatery to eat.
Damn that must have been so long ago, probably like last century or something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496372</id>
	<title>McDonald's is your kind of place...</title>
	<author>vaporland</author>
	<datestamp>1261155360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Porn movies in your face!<br>Free music peer to peer,<br>Download without the fear!<br>And don't forget the kiddie pix,<br>Craigslist and turning tricks!<br>McDonalds is your kind of place...</p><p>(apologies to Ray Kroc)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Porn movies in your face ! Free music peer to peer,Download without the fear ! And do n't forget the kiddie pix,Craigslist and turning tricks ! McDonalds is your kind of place... ( apologies to Ray Kroc )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Porn movies in your face!Free music peer to peer,Download without the fear!And don't forget the kiddie pix,Craigslist and turning tricks!McDonalds is your kind of place...(apologies to Ray Kroc)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495674</id>
	<title>Re:understanding is critical here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261147260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find it hard to believe that, before the Netbook revolution, people were getting 6-8 hours battery life from their laptops.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find it hard to believe that , before the Netbook revolution , people were getting 6-8 hours battery life from their laptops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find it hard to believe that, before the Netbook revolution, people were getting 6-8 hours battery life from their laptops.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491586</id>
	<title>Re:Starbucks free?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I needed to have one of their cards and enter the number to get around 90 min free I think, but that was 6 months ago.  I keep an almost dead card in my wallet just in case.  BK is my friend though, I just park in the parking lot when we troubleshoot VPN problems for needy sales staff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I needed to have one of their cards and enter the number to get around 90 min free I think , but that was 6 months ago .
I keep an almost dead card in my wallet just in case .
BK is my friend though , I just park in the parking lot when we troubleshoot VPN problems for needy sales staff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I needed to have one of their cards and enter the number to get around 90 min free I think, but that was 6 months ago.
I keep an almost dead card in my wallet just in case.
BK is my friend though, I just park in the parking lot when we troubleshoot VPN problems for needy sales staff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491400</id>
	<title>Re:Starbucks free?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261167420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep. I *just* tried it in a local (downtown Manhattan) starbucks, and it's not "open" for everyone. You can get it ``free'' by having one of those starbucks cards (which is how I was able to get online).</p><p>Would be nice not to have that screwy AT&amp;T login process... (or timeouts after 20 minutes).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep .
I * just * tried it in a local ( downtown Manhattan ) starbucks , and it 's not " open " for everyone .
You can get it ` ` free' ' by having one of those starbucks cards ( which is how I was able to get online ) .Would be nice not to have that screwy AT&amp;T login process... ( or timeouts after 20 minutes ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep.
I *just* tried it in a local (downtown Manhattan) starbucks, and it's not "open" for everyone.
You can get it ``free'' by having one of those starbucks cards (which is how I was able to get online).Would be nice not to have that screwy AT&amp;T login process... (or timeouts after 20 minutes).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489794</id>
	<title>Airports will still charge</title>
	<author>dxk3355</author>
	<datestamp>1261161780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure that they will still charge for Wi-Fi at places where a monopoly can be guaranteed like airports.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure that they will still charge for Wi-Fi at places where a monopoly can be guaranteed like airports .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure that they will still charge for Wi-Fi at places where a monopoly can be guaranteed like airports.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489640</id>
	<title>Why would businesses NOT do this?</title>
	<author>tixxit</author>
	<datestamp>1261161420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>In my smallish city (200k people) we have had free wifi all over downtown for a while. All the businesses downtown are part of committee and they basically all agreed to provide free wifi; everything from Subway, to Starbucks, to some random bar. Seems like a good way to do it. If a business tried charging it'd just look ridiculous.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In my smallish city ( 200k people ) we have had free wifi all over downtown for a while .
All the businesses downtown are part of committee and they basically all agreed to provide free wifi ; everything from Subway , to Starbucks , to some random bar .
Seems like a good way to do it .
If a business tried charging it 'd just look ridiculous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my smallish city (200k people) we have had free wifi all over downtown for a while.
All the businesses downtown are part of committee and they basically all agreed to provide free wifi; everything from Subway, to Starbucks, to some random bar.
Seems like a good way to do it.
If a business tried charging it'd just look ridiculous.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490682</id>
	<title>Try 2004</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1261164660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>McDonald's WiFi has been free since late 2005.</p><p>All you needed was a Nintendo DS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>McDonald 's WiFi has been free since late 2005.All you needed was a Nintendo DS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>McDonald's WiFi has been free since late 2005.All you needed was a Nintendo DS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490536</id>
	<title>VOIP!</title>
	<author>Deliveranc3</author>
	<datestamp>1261164120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jesus when these go 802.11n there's going to be pretty serious municipal coverage.<br> <br> Android users (and apparently Nokia n900) are experiencing seamless voip integration... looking bad for the telecos!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jesus when these go 802.11n there 's going to be pretty serious municipal coverage .
Android users ( and apparently Nokia n900 ) are experiencing seamless voip integration... looking bad for the telecos !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jesus when these go 802.11n there's going to be pretty serious municipal coverage.
Android users (and apparently Nokia n900) are experiencing seamless voip integration... looking bad for the telecos!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495192</id>
	<title>Re:It's the expensive places that still charge for</title>
	<author>CSMatt</author>
	<datestamp>1261142340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hiltons, in particular, often charge unbelievable rates: $15/night in some hotels.</p></div><p>I had heard they were promiscuous socialites, but had no idea they were hookers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hiltons , in particular , often charge unbelievable rates : $ 15/night in some hotels.I had heard they were promiscuous socialites , but had no idea they were hookers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hiltons, in particular, often charge unbelievable rates: $15/night in some hotels.I had heard they were promiscuous socialites, but had no idea they were hookers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490884</id>
	<title>Product placement plus tech support</title>
	<author>SoundGuyNoise</author>
	<datestamp>1261165440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is your Big MAC address? Have you enabled your Wi-Fry connection?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is your Big MAC address ?
Have you enabled your Wi-Fry connection ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is your Big MAC address?
Have you enabled your Wi-Fry connection?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490044</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Flame broiled, reheated in a microwave.  That's how BK does it.  I've seen it.  Still better than McD's though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Flame broiled , reheated in a microwave .
That 's how BK does it .
I 've seen it .
Still better than McD 's though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flame broiled, reheated in a microwave.
That's how BK does it.
I've seen it.
Still better than McD's though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489996</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>chill</author>
	<datestamp>1261162440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dress in a black turtleneck sweater and use a Macbook while talking (via bluetooth) on your iPhone.  If you wear glasses, make sure to look over them, down your nose at other people and scowl protectively when anyone gets near your personal space.  That'll make you look arrogant and pompous no matter where you go.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dress in a black turtleneck sweater and use a Macbook while talking ( via bluetooth ) on your iPhone .
If you wear glasses , make sure to look over them , down your nose at other people and scowl protectively when anyone gets near your personal space .
That 'll make you look arrogant and pompous no matter where you go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dress in a black turtleneck sweater and use a Macbook while talking (via bluetooth) on your iPhone.
If you wear glasses, make sure to look over them, down your nose at other people and scowl protectively when anyone gets near your personal space.
That'll make you look arrogant and pompous no matter where you go.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492820</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>compro01</author>
	<datestamp>1261129380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have evidently never eaten at New York Fries or made your own.  Either one beats McD's fries with a sack of potatoes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have evidently never eaten at New York Fries or made your own .
Either one beats McD 's fries with a sack of potatoes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have evidently never eaten at New York Fries or made your own.
Either one beats McD's fries with a sack of potatoes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490748</id>
	<title>They charge for it?</title>
	<author>Urza9814</author>
	<datestamp>1261164900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are places in the US where McDonalds charges for Wifi? I've never seen one. I know all the ones in my town that offer wifi (about 3 of them I think) are all free, and have been for at least 3 years. Any other ones I've been to that I've bothered to check have also been free. Where is it that they've been charging for it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are places in the US where McDonalds charges for Wifi ?
I 've never seen one .
I know all the ones in my town that offer wifi ( about 3 of them I think ) are all free , and have been for at least 3 years .
Any other ones I 've been to that I 've bothered to check have also been free .
Where is it that they 've been charging for it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are places in the US where McDonalds charges for Wifi?
I've never seen one.
I know all the ones in my town that offer wifi (about 3 of them I think) are all free, and have been for at least 3 years.
Any other ones I've been to that I've bothered to check have also been free.
Where is it that they've been charging for it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493884</id>
	<title>Re:No Purchase Required?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261134180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about across the street with a pringles can?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about across the street with a pringles can ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about across the street with a pringles can?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490314</id>
	<title>Re:Starbucks free? -- Da Rules</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261163400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Free for up to 2 hours (per-day, may not be split across multiple login sessions) if you've registered one of their Starbucks stored-value cards and you've used it to make a purchase sometime within the last 30 days.</p><p>So more "free with purchase"-style.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Free for up to 2 hours ( per-day , may not be split across multiple login sessions ) if you 've registered one of their Starbucks stored-value cards and you 've used it to make a purchase sometime within the last 30 days.So more " free with purchase " -style .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free for up to 2 hours (per-day, may not be split across multiple login sessions) if you've registered one of their Starbucks stored-value cards and you've used it to make a purchase sometime within the last 30 days.So more "free with purchase"-style.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493748</id>
	<title>Re:No Purchase Required?</title>
	<author>melf-san</author>
	<datestamp>1261133460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thats what directional high gain antennas are for<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats what directional high gain antennas are for : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats what directional high gain antennas are for :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491230</id>
	<title>Re:No Purchase Required?</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1261166700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know why but it has been free in France for years. I never got bothered when going there to just get connection. I suppose I may be during rush hours but I have never seen more than 2 or 3 people with laptops at the same time anyway so I guess the issue is not that big. And the smell of food often makes you buy something anyway. I don't think they lose anything.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know why but it has been free in France for years .
I never got bothered when going there to just get connection .
I suppose I may be during rush hours but I have never seen more than 2 or 3 people with laptops at the same time anyway so I guess the issue is not that big .
And the smell of food often makes you buy something anyway .
I do n't think they lose anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know why but it has been free in France for years.
I never got bothered when going there to just get connection.
I suppose I may be during rush hours but I have never seen more than 2 or 3 people with laptops at the same time anyway so I guess the issue is not that big.
And the smell of food often makes you buy something anyway.
I don't think they lose anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492166</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1261127040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Flame Broiled, or nothing.</p><p>-JJS</p></div><p>Only if you're not in California/Arizona/Nevada - otherwise,  Animal-style double-double FTW!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Flame Broiled , or nothing.-JJSOnly if you 're not in California/Arizona/Nevada - otherwise , Animal-style double-double FTW !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flame Broiled, or nothing.-JJSOnly if you're not in California/Arizona/Nevada - otherwise,  Animal-style double-double FTW!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493652</id>
	<title>Already Free Here</title>
	<author>TheNinjaroach</author>
	<datestamp>1261132920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>WiFi has always been free at our McDonald's here in Podunk, Ohio.</htmltext>
<tokenext>WiFi has always been free at our McDonald 's here in Podunk , Ohio .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WiFi has always been free at our McDonald's here in Podunk, Ohio.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491106</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>Anne Thwacks</author>
	<datestamp>1261166160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its not much use in the UK, because while you are using it, you will likely get a GBP60 fine for parking. Most McD's have clampers that get you if you stay longer than a set time - often 30 minutes! They even tried it on a judge (Google is your friend).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its not much use in the UK , because while you are using it , you will likely get a GBP60 fine for parking .
Most McD 's have clampers that get you if you stay longer than a set time - often 30 minutes !
They even tried it on a judge ( Google is your friend ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its not much use in the UK, because while you are using it, you will likely get a GBP60 fine for parking.
Most McD's have clampers that get you if you stay longer than a set time - often 30 minutes!
They even tried it on a judge (Google is your friend).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489522</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>d3ac0n</author>
	<datestamp>1261161000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Flame Broiled Nothin'!</p><p>I'll take some lean, thin-sliced Roast Beef over a Burger ANY DAY.</p><p>Arby's all the way baby!</p><p>Crap.  Now I'm hungry again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Flame Broiled Nothin ' ! I 'll take some lean , thin-sliced Roast Beef over a Burger ANY DAY.Arby 's all the way baby ! Crap .
Now I 'm hungry again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flame Broiled Nothin'!I'll take some lean, thin-sliced Roast Beef over a Burger ANY DAY.Arby's all the way baby!Crap.
Now I'm hungry again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491118</id>
	<title>Re:Why would businesses NOT do this?</title>
	<author>eggoeater</author>
	<datestamp>1261166220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's amazing is most airports, ORD, SFO, and SEA included, still charge for Wifi.  <br>
I guess since you're stuck there and you need Wifi, they've got you by the balls.
<br>
Some of my coworkers who travel a lot have air cards just for when they're in airports.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's amazing is most airports , ORD , SFO , and SEA included , still charge for Wifi .
I guess since you 're stuck there and you need Wifi , they 've got you by the balls .
Some of my coworkers who travel a lot have air cards just for when they 're in airports .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's amazing is most airports, ORD, SFO, and SEA included, still charge for Wifi.
I guess since you're stuck there and you need Wifi, they've got you by the balls.
Some of my coworkers who travel a lot have air cards just for when they're in airports.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491014</id>
	<title>On the Internet nobody knows...</title>
	<author>istartedi</author>
	<datestamp>1261165860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the Internet, nobody knows you're chowing 255.
Tell 'em you're at this very chic new place, the one
in SF that has the $50,000 machine that's supposed
to make the perfect espresso.  They probably won't
be able to track your actual location.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the Internet , nobody knows you 're chowing 255 .
Tell 'em you 're at this very chic new place , the one in SF that has the $ 50,000 machine that 's supposed to make the perfect espresso .
They probably wo n't be able to track your actual location .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the Internet, nobody knows you're chowing 255.
Tell 'em you're at this very chic new place, the one
in SF that has the $50,000 machine that's supposed
to make the perfect espresso.
They probably won't
be able to track your actual location.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493662</id>
	<title>Re:Starbucks free?</title>
	<author>moredrivel</author>
	<datestamp>1261132980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it just me, or free wifi from Starbucks is just some wishful thinking? </p></div><p>It's free if you register a Starbucks card and maintain a balance on that card.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or free wifi from Starbucks is just some wishful thinking ?
It 's free if you register a Starbucks card and maintain a balance on that card .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or free wifi from Starbucks is just some wishful thinking?
It's free if you register a Starbucks card and maintain a balance on that card.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490664</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>captaindomon</author>
	<datestamp>1261164600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't have kids, do you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't have kids , do you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't have kids, do you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30497024</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261165080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the US, such protection is provided by the much misunderstood DMCA.  Just thought I'd point that out as a big Fuck You to the ignoramuses on Slashdot who don't understand copyright law.</p><p>You would be lucky to have an equivalent to the DMCA over there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the US , such protection is provided by the much misunderstood DMCA .
Just thought I 'd point that out as a big Fuck You to the ignoramuses on Slashdot who do n't understand copyright law.You would be lucky to have an equivalent to the DMCA over there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the US, such protection is provided by the much misunderstood DMCA.
Just thought I'd point that out as a big Fuck You to the ignoramuses on Slashdot who don't understand copyright law.You would be lucky to have an equivalent to the DMCA over there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493060</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>drsquare</author>
	<datestamp>1261130340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What, those tiny little shrivelled things served in microscopic portions? I got some 'large' fries from McDonalds once, there was more potato in 1840s Ireland.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What , those tiny little shrivelled things served in microscopic portions ?
I got some 'large ' fries from McDonalds once , there was more potato in 1840s Ireland .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, those tiny little shrivelled things served in microscopic portions?
I got some 'large' fries from McDonalds once, there was more potato in 1840s Ireland.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491038</id>
	<title>Wishful thinking?</title>
	<author>YourExperiment</author>
	<datestamp>1261165920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>With around 20,000 free hotspots between McDonald's and Starbucks (who went free[ish] earlier this year), anyone still charging for Wi-Fi is going to look foolish, if not downright greedy."</p></div><p>I love the way Slashdot articles say stuff that just isn't true, just because the submitter wishes it was. It's so adorable.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>With around 20,000 free hotspots between McDonald 's and Starbucks ( who went free [ ish ] earlier this year ) , anyone still charging for Wi-Fi is going to look foolish , if not downright greedy .
" I love the way Slashdot articles say stuff that just is n't true , just because the submitter wishes it was .
It 's so adorable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With around 20,000 free hotspots between McDonald's and Starbucks (who went free[ish] earlier this year), anyone still charging for Wi-Fi is going to look foolish, if not downright greedy.
"I love the way Slashdot articles say stuff that just isn't true, just because the submitter wishes it was.
It's so adorable.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490774</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261165020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So then you don't eat at BK, because they microwave the crap out of their burgers. Disgusting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So then you do n't eat at BK , because they microwave the crap out of their burgers .
Disgusting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So then you don't eat at BK, because they microwave the crap out of their burgers.
Disgusting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490688</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>residieu</author>
	<datestamp>1261164660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>no foam? What is wrong with you? Foam is the one and only reason to go to Starbucks (the coffee itself isn't that great). Just give me a big cup of nothing but foamed milk. And another cup with HIS foamed milk, since he doesn't want it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>no foam ?
What is wrong with you ?
Foam is the one and only reason to go to Starbucks ( the coffee itself is n't that great ) .
Just give me a big cup of nothing but foamed milk .
And another cup with HIS foamed milk , since he does n't want it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no foam?
What is wrong with you?
Foam is the one and only reason to go to Starbucks (the coffee itself isn't that great).
Just give me a big cup of nothing but foamed milk.
And another cup with HIS foamed milk, since he doesn't want it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489540</id>
	<title>excellent - anonymous downloads</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261161060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can now use the McDonalds wifi connections to plan terrorist activities and download child porn!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can now use the McDonalds wifi connections to plan terrorist activities and download child porn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can now use the McDonalds wifi connections to plan terrorist activities and download child porn!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490368</id>
	<title>Re:understanding is critical here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261163580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>starbucks isn't charging for the WIFI</tt> <br>
Must be nice.  The two closest starbucks do charge for wifi. So I go to a local coffee shop and buy a coffee to use their "free" wifi.  It's still cheaper than just paying for starbuck's t-mobile wifi.</htmltext>
<tokenext>starbucks is n't charging for the WIFI Must be nice .
The two closest starbucks do charge for wifi .
So I go to a local coffee shop and buy a coffee to use their " free " wifi .
It 's still cheaper than just paying for starbuck 's t-mobile wifi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>starbucks isn't charging for the WIFI 
Must be nice.
The two closest starbucks do charge for wifi.
So I go to a local coffee shop and buy a coffee to use their "free" wifi.
It's still cheaper than just paying for starbuck's t-mobile wifi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491880</id>
	<title>Re:Try 2004</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That deal <a href="http://www.knowzy.com/free-mcdonalds-wifi.htm#NintendoDSGone" title="knowzy.com" rel="nofollow">ended in late 2007</a> [knowzy.com], though there were still lots of other ways to get free Wi-Fi at McDonald's- Qwest and AT&amp;T DSL customers, for example had free reign.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That deal ended in late 2007 [ knowzy.com ] , though there were still lots of other ways to get free Wi-Fi at McDonald 's- Qwest and AT&amp;T DSL customers , for example had free reign .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That deal ended in late 2007 [knowzy.com], though there were still lots of other ways to get free Wi-Fi at McDonald's- Qwest and AT&amp;T DSL customers, for example had free reign.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491180</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1261166520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You call those sloppy pale mini-sticks &ldquo;fries&rdquo;?</p><p>Here&rsquo;s how real fries look like: <a href="http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.gentoo\%3Aen-US\%3Aofficial&amp;um=1&amp;sa=1&amp;q=belgische+frieten&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=&amp;start=0" title="google.com">http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.gentoo\%3Aen-US\%3Aofficial&amp;um=1&amp;sa=1&amp;q=belgische+frieten&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=&amp;start=0</a> [google.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Belgian fries. In my opinion the best fries in the world. Especially if made with eastern-European potatoes (those that still taste like potatoes). If you ever get there, try them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You call those sloppy pale mini-sticks    fries    ? Here    s how real fries look like : http : //images.google.com/images ? hl = en&amp;safe = off&amp;client = firefox-a&amp;rls = org.gentoo \ % 3Aen-US \ % 3Aofficial&amp;um = 1&amp;sa = 1&amp;q = belgische + frieten&amp;aq = f&amp;oq = &amp;aqi = &amp;start = 0 [ google.com ] : ) Belgian fries .
In my opinion the best fries in the world .
Especially if made with eastern-European potatoes ( those that still taste like potatoes ) .
If you ever get there , try them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You call those sloppy pale mini-sticks “fries”?Here’s how real fries look like: http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.gentoo\%3Aen-US\%3Aofficial&amp;um=1&amp;sa=1&amp;q=belgische+frieten&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=&amp;start=0 [google.com] :)Belgian fries.
In my opinion the best fries in the world.
Especially if made with eastern-European potatoes (those that still taste like potatoes).
If you ever get there, try them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492906</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry Charlie, <a href="http://images.google.com/images?client=safari&amp;rls=en&amp;q=duck+fat+fries&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ei=muorS9LZIoXosQPNquHEBA&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=image\_result\_group&amp;ct=title&amp;resnum=4&amp;ved=0CBwQsAQwAw" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">these</a> [google.com] make Belgian fries seem like Belgians in comparison.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry Charlie , these [ google.com ] make Belgian fries seem like Belgians in comparison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry Charlie, these [google.com] make Belgian fries seem like Belgians in comparison.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492194</id>
	<title>Re:understanding is critical here</title>
	<author>all5n</author>
	<datestamp>1261127100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>T-Mobile lost the Starbucks contract to AT&amp;T a couple years ago.  AT&amp;T wanted it so badly that they were willing to take terms that T-Mobile just wouldn't (wanting to actually keep making money off the service, crazy i know).</p><p>Requirements that the contract holder develop a method for people to order coffee from their iPhones was one of the driving forces in the decision.  Another one was the required development to support their current "pay for coffee with a SBUX card, get free wifi for a couple hours" offering.</p><p>All that development work was/is expensive.</p><p>TL:DR Response:<br>The networks at SBUX are all run by AT&amp;T now.</p><p>The HotSpot division of T-Mobile has been gutted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>T-Mobile lost the Starbucks contract to AT&amp;T a couple years ago .
AT&amp;T wanted it so badly that they were willing to take terms that T-Mobile just would n't ( wanting to actually keep making money off the service , crazy i know ) .Requirements that the contract holder develop a method for people to order coffee from their iPhones was one of the driving forces in the decision .
Another one was the required development to support their current " pay for coffee with a SBUX card , get free wifi for a couple hours " offering.All that development work was/is expensive.TL : DR Response : The networks at SBUX are all run by AT&amp;T now.The HotSpot division of T-Mobile has been gutted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>T-Mobile lost the Starbucks contract to AT&amp;T a couple years ago.
AT&amp;T wanted it so badly that they were willing to take terms that T-Mobile just wouldn't (wanting to actually keep making money off the service, crazy i know).Requirements that the contract holder develop a method for people to order coffee from their iPhones was one of the driving forces in the decision.
Another one was the required development to support their current "pay for coffee with a SBUX card, get free wifi for a couple hours" offering.All that development work was/is expensive.TL:DR Response:The networks at SBUX are all run by AT&amp;T now.The HotSpot division of T-Mobile has been gutted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490368</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496326</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1261154460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's part of a larger effort by McDonalds to reinvent their more metropolitan stores as a chain of coffee shops that happen to sell fast food also.</p><p>Besides, it always makes sense for a food service business to offer free wifi. For as long as McDonald's has been ubiquitous, the golden arches have symbolized two primary things to travellers: 1) cheap, mediocre food 2) relatively clean bathrooms. No reason why #3 can't be relatively stable wifi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's part of a larger effort by McDonalds to reinvent their more metropolitan stores as a chain of coffee shops that happen to sell fast food also.Besides , it always makes sense for a food service business to offer free wifi .
For as long as McDonald 's has been ubiquitous , the golden arches have symbolized two primary things to travellers : 1 ) cheap , mediocre food 2 ) relatively clean bathrooms .
No reason why # 3 ca n't be relatively stable wifi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's part of a larger effort by McDonalds to reinvent their more metropolitan stores as a chain of coffee shops that happen to sell fast food also.Besides, it always makes sense for a food service business to offer free wifi.
For as long as McDonald's has been ubiquitous, the golden arches have symbolized two primary things to travellers: 1) cheap, mediocre food 2) relatively clean bathrooms.
No reason why #3 can't be relatively stable wifi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491582</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>Translation Error</author>
	<datestamp>1261168200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>You're just trying to start a flame war.</p></div></blockquote><p>
A flame broiled war, you mean!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're just trying to start a flame war .
A flame broiled war , you mean !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're just trying to start a flame war.
A flame broiled war, you mean!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493542</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1261132380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The one in my hometown is actually really nice. Padded seats, tasteful paint and paintings on the wall... I can't speak for quality of the playland. I've hung around there and used my wifi, but only when I was working from home and my house power went out... McDonalds had lights + wifi, and that's all I need.</p><p>People rag on McDonalds all the time, but the one thing that stands out for me is that it's the only fast food place near me where the staff is always polite. I've never had a rude cashier at McDonalds, but that's all I seem to get at Taco Bell, Jack in the Box, or KFC. (Arby's and Burger King are usually ok.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The one in my hometown is actually really nice .
Padded seats , tasteful paint and paintings on the wall... I ca n't speak for quality of the playland .
I 've hung around there and used my wifi , but only when I was working from home and my house power went out... McDonalds had lights + wifi , and that 's all I need.People rag on McDonalds all the time , but the one thing that stands out for me is that it 's the only fast food place near me where the staff is always polite .
I 've never had a rude cashier at McDonalds , but that 's all I seem to get at Taco Bell , Jack in the Box , or KFC .
( Arby 's and Burger King are usually ok. )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The one in my hometown is actually really nice.
Padded seats, tasteful paint and paintings on the wall... I can't speak for quality of the playland.
I've hung around there and used my wifi, but only when I was working from home and my house power went out... McDonalds had lights + wifi, and that's all I need.People rag on McDonalds all the time, but the one thing that stands out for me is that it's the only fast food place near me where the staff is always polite.
I've never had a rude cashier at McDonalds, but that's all I seem to get at Taco Bell, Jack in the Box, or KFC.
(Arby's and Burger King are usually ok.)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490534</id>
	<title>Expect bright lights</title>
	<author>Hal\_Porter</author>
	<datestamp>1261164120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read somewhere that back in the 80's McDonalds in the US inner cities had problems with crack addicts. They'd stay all day, maybe buy a coffee or fries occasionally. Hardcore crack addicts don't eat much but they need small amounts of water, salt, sugar, caffeine and fat which were supplied by the coffee and fries. They smelled bad and were abusive and scared away the regular customers who'd spend more and leave quicker. The revenue per table hour started to drop in the crack addict infested restaurants. McDonalds Corporate was made aware of the problem and asked for directions.</p><p>McDonalds is a bit like the bugs in Starship Troopers - lower level drones are able to implement policy and are interrogated about falling revenues but not trusted to make policy. That was done by MBAs - the McDonalds equivalent of Brain Bugs - in the headquarters. Now clearly forcefully evicting the crack addicts though possible would create a bad atmosphere. Studies were commissioned. It was found that crack addicts dislike bright lights but the good customers - people who wolf down this months's special premium burger supersize meal ("SwissMac Meal! With real Swiss Cheese!") and then got the hell out - weren't bothered by them. Or indeed anything else.</p><p>A decision was made to increase the ambient light levels. The crack addicts left and revenues increased. My guess is geeks leaching wifi will need to be repelled in the same way, and for much the same reasons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read somewhere that back in the 80 's McDonalds in the US inner cities had problems with crack addicts .
They 'd stay all day , maybe buy a coffee or fries occasionally .
Hardcore crack addicts do n't eat much but they need small amounts of water , salt , sugar , caffeine and fat which were supplied by the coffee and fries .
They smelled bad and were abusive and scared away the regular customers who 'd spend more and leave quicker .
The revenue per table hour started to drop in the crack addict infested restaurants .
McDonalds Corporate was made aware of the problem and asked for directions.McDonalds is a bit like the bugs in Starship Troopers - lower level drones are able to implement policy and are interrogated about falling revenues but not trusted to make policy .
That was done by MBAs - the McDonalds equivalent of Brain Bugs - in the headquarters .
Now clearly forcefully evicting the crack addicts though possible would create a bad atmosphere .
Studies were commissioned .
It was found that crack addicts dislike bright lights but the good customers - people who wolf down this months 's special premium burger supersize meal ( " SwissMac Meal !
With real Swiss Cheese !
" ) and then got the hell out - were n't bothered by them .
Or indeed anything else.A decision was made to increase the ambient light levels .
The crack addicts left and revenues increased .
My guess is geeks leaching wifi will need to be repelled in the same way , and for much the same reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read somewhere that back in the 80's McDonalds in the US inner cities had problems with crack addicts.
They'd stay all day, maybe buy a coffee or fries occasionally.
Hardcore crack addicts don't eat much but they need small amounts of water, salt, sugar, caffeine and fat which were supplied by the coffee and fries.
They smelled bad and were abusive and scared away the regular customers who'd spend more and leave quicker.
The revenue per table hour started to drop in the crack addict infested restaurants.
McDonalds Corporate was made aware of the problem and asked for directions.McDonalds is a bit like the bugs in Starship Troopers - lower level drones are able to implement policy and are interrogated about falling revenues but not trusted to make policy.
That was done by MBAs - the McDonalds equivalent of Brain Bugs - in the headquarters.
Now clearly forcefully evicting the crack addicts though possible would create a bad atmosphere.
Studies were commissioned.
It was found that crack addicts dislike bright lights but the good customers - people who wolf down this months's special premium burger supersize meal ("SwissMac Meal!
With real Swiss Cheese!
") and then got the hell out - weren't bothered by them.
Or indeed anything else.A decision was made to increase the ambient light levels.
The crack addicts left and revenues increased.
My guess is geeks leaching wifi will need to be repelled in the same way, and for much the same reasons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489608</id>
	<title>Anonymous surfing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261161240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only terrorists......</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only terrorists..... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only terrorists......</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489758</id>
	<title>Urban</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1261161660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>So I guess all those folks living in apartment or condos right next to McDonalds will get free Internet access (albeit, minimal speeds). Or even better, a competitive fast food chain next door can set up an cantenna to leech bandwidth and then stick a 'Free WiFi!' in their window too!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So I guess all those folks living in apartment or condos right next to McDonalds will get free Internet access ( albeit , minimal speeds ) .
Or even better , a competitive fast food chain next door can set up an cantenna to leech bandwidth and then stick a 'Free WiFi !
' in their window too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I guess all those folks living in apartment or condos right next to McDonalds will get free Internet access (albeit, minimal speeds).
Or even better, a competitive fast food chain next door can set up an cantenna to leech bandwidth and then stick a 'Free WiFi!
' in their window too!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489674</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1261161480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You have to realize though, even if you might not use your -laptop- there, many other devices use Wi-Fi. For example, people with iPod touches could go on Facebook or surf the web, same with people with a DSi, PSP, etc. And yes, there are many people out there without a smartphone or who want slightly faster internet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have to realize though , even if you might not use your -laptop- there , many other devices use Wi-Fi .
For example , people with iPod touches could go on Facebook or surf the web , same with people with a DSi , PSP , etc .
And yes , there are many people out there without a smartphone or who want slightly faster internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have to realize though, even if you might not use your -laptop- there, many other devices use Wi-Fi.
For example, people with iPod touches could go on Facebook or surf the web, same with people with a DSi, PSP, etc.
And yes, there are many people out there without a smartphone or who want slightly faster internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495648</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261147020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Australia you see this being used a lot - but only at MacDonalds near universities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Australia you see this being used a lot - but only at MacDonalds near universities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Australia you see this being used a lot - but only at MacDonalds near universities.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496070</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261151040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, safe search off, using firefox on gentoo, is using a EN/US software build (likely, an English speaker in the US).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , safe search off , using firefox on gentoo , is using a EN/US software build ( likely , an English speaker in the US ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, safe search off, using firefox on gentoo, is using a EN/US software build (likely, an English speaker in the US).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490408</id>
	<title>Re:understanding is critical here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261163700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Starbucks doesn't exactly charge for the wifi here in Mexico, but you must enter the user id and password you get in your purchase ticket. Several other places do that too.</p><p>The only difference, is that Starbucks also allows you to plug in your laptop to the AC.</p><p>So a lot of people buy a small cup of regular coffee and stay four hours in a comfy seats...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Starbucks does n't exactly charge for the wifi here in Mexico , but you must enter the user id and password you get in your purchase ticket .
Several other places do that too.The only difference , is that Starbucks also allows you to plug in your laptop to the AC.So a lot of people buy a small cup of regular coffee and stay four hours in a comfy seats.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Starbucks doesn't exactly charge for the wifi here in Mexico, but you must enter the user id and password you get in your purchase ticket.
Several other places do that too.The only difference, is that Starbucks also allows you to plug in your laptop to the AC.So a lot of people buy a small cup of regular coffee and stay four hours in a comfy seats...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491558</id>
	<title>I'm glad some places charge...</title>
	<author>RandomUsername99</author>
	<datestamp>1261168080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Living in Boston, I'm quite happy that some specific places charge for wifi. Especially in the Cambridge/Somerville area it can be downright impossible to try and get a seat at a coffee shop that doesn't charge for wifi. It's not uncommon to see hoards of people sitting there for HOURS during the busiest times of day with a laptop and a long-since emptied small coffee. There are plenty of places around that give out free wifi, and there should be. In places where there are so many users that they're actually losing business because paying customers can't find a table, they should certainly charge a nominal fee.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Living in Boston , I 'm quite happy that some specific places charge for wifi .
Especially in the Cambridge/Somerville area it can be downright impossible to try and get a seat at a coffee shop that does n't charge for wifi .
It 's not uncommon to see hoards of people sitting there for HOURS during the busiest times of day with a laptop and a long-since emptied small coffee .
There are plenty of places around that give out free wifi , and there should be .
In places where there are so many users that they 're actually losing business because paying customers ca n't find a table , they should certainly charge a nominal fee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Living in Boston, I'm quite happy that some specific places charge for wifi.
Especially in the Cambridge/Somerville area it can be downright impossible to try and get a seat at a coffee shop that doesn't charge for wifi.
It's not uncommon to see hoards of people sitting there for HOURS during the busiest times of day with a laptop and a long-since emptied small coffee.
There are plenty of places around that give out free wifi, and there should be.
In places where there are so many users that they're actually losing business because paying customers can't find a table, they should certainly charge a nominal fee.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494828</id>
	<title>This is great news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261139520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>we now have nationwide wiFi Coverage!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>we now have nationwide wiFi Coverage !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we now have nationwide wiFi Coverage!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494814</id>
	<title>Re:understanding is critical here</title>
	<author>easyTree</author>
	<datestamp>1261139400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>starbucks isn't charging for the WIFI <b>although they have a 7900\% markup on coffee.</b></p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>starbucks is n't charging for the WIFI although they have a 7900 \ % markup on coffee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>starbucks isn't charging for the WIFI although they have a 7900\% markup on coffee.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490064</id>
	<title>mac, meet big mac</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>big mac and mac book unite.  if i am mcdonalds, i start selling macs in a sleek shiny white box, to market the connection.</htmltext>
<tokenext>big mac and mac book unite .
if i am mcdonalds , i start selling macs in a sleek shiny white box , to market the connection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>big mac and mac book unite.
if i am mcdonalds, i start selling macs in a sleek shiny white box, to market the connection.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490632</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>trentblase</author>
	<datestamp>1261164480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you wear glasses, make sure to look over them, down your nose</p></div><p>Somebody has a funny shaped face</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you wear glasses , make sure to look over them , down your noseSomebody has a funny shaped face</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you wear glasses, make sure to look over them, down your noseSomebody has a funny shaped face
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430</id>
	<title>We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261160640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unsure how successful it has been in the UK though. Never seen anyone use it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unsure how successful it has been in the UK though .
Never seen anyone use it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unsure how successful it has been in the UK though.
Never seen anyone use it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490744</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>ProfessionalCookie</author>
	<datestamp>1261164900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's pun-bait.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's pun-bait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's pun-bait.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492076</id>
	<title>Power sharing</title>
	<author>ei4anb</author>
	<datestamp>1261169880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some people in Paris bring multi-socket extension leads when they go to McDo's to ensure that everyone can plug in. WiFi has been free at McDo's in France for years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some people in Paris bring multi-socket extension leads when they go to McDo 's to ensure that everyone can plug in .
WiFi has been free at McDo 's in France for years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some people in Paris bring multi-socket extension leads when they go to McDo's to ensure that everyone can plug in.
WiFi has been free at McDo's in France for years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491770</id>
	<title>3 Strikes Law?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How fun will it be when the 3 strikes law takes out  the McDonalds ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How fun will it be when the 3 strikes law takes out the McDonalds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How fun will it be when the 3 strikes law takes out  the McDonalds ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489948</id>
	<title>Starbucks is retarded!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For Starbucks to not have free wifi for ALL customers by now is dumb. I don't mean ATT or TMobile customers, and I don't mean the "Get 2 hrs of Free Wifi for using your Starbucks card" customers. I mean anyone who plops their ass down in the store after buying something.</p><p>Several mom and pop coffee shops in my hood offer free wifi, and if they can afford it so can 2-5 dollars per cup-o-joe Starbucks!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For Starbucks to not have free wifi for ALL customers by now is dumb .
I do n't mean ATT or TMobile customers , and I do n't mean the " Get 2 hrs of Free Wifi for using your Starbucks card " customers .
I mean anyone who plops their ass down in the store after buying something.Several mom and pop coffee shops in my hood offer free wifi , and if they can afford it so can 2-5 dollars per cup-o-joe Starbucks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For Starbucks to not have free wifi for ALL customers by now is dumb.
I don't mean ATT or TMobile customers, and I don't mean the "Get 2 hrs of Free Wifi for using your Starbucks card" customers.
I mean anyone who plops their ass down in the store after buying something.Several mom and pop coffee shops in my hood offer free wifi, and if they can afford it so can 2-5 dollars per cup-o-joe Starbucks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494896</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261139880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tried getting my netbook out in McDonalds once and was disappointed to find that the supposedly free wifi is provided by an outfit called the Cloud (which also provides wifi for Wetherspoons among others) and requires you to download some dodgy looking piece of software to connect. The software is Windows and Mac only of course. Now even if I did run one of those two OSes I would hesitate at installing 3rd party software to connect to a network for a number of reasons which are obvious enough that I shouldn't need to go into them here.</p><p>If they ever decide to do it properly... well I can't say I'll spend more time in McDonalds. But I probably will spend more time in Wetherspoons. It's a good enough excuse right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried getting my netbook out in McDonalds once and was disappointed to find that the supposedly free wifi is provided by an outfit called the Cloud ( which also provides wifi for Wetherspoons among others ) and requires you to download some dodgy looking piece of software to connect .
The software is Windows and Mac only of course .
Now even if I did run one of those two OSes I would hesitate at installing 3rd party software to connect to a network for a number of reasons which are obvious enough that I should n't need to go into them here.If they ever decide to do it properly... well I ca n't say I 'll spend more time in McDonalds .
But I probably will spend more time in Wetherspoons .
It 's a good enough excuse right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried getting my netbook out in McDonalds once and was disappointed to find that the supposedly free wifi is provided by an outfit called the Cloud (which also provides wifi for Wetherspoons among others) and requires you to download some dodgy looking piece of software to connect.
The software is Windows and Mac only of course.
Now even if I did run one of those two OSes I would hesitate at installing 3rd party software to connect to a network for a number of reasons which are obvious enough that I shouldn't need to go into them here.If they ever decide to do it properly... well I can't say I'll spend more time in McDonalds.
But I probably will spend more time in Wetherspoons.
It's a good enough excuse right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489454</id>
	<title>McWi-Fi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261160760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For McHackerz</htmltext>
<tokenext>For McHackerz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For McHackerz</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491198</id>
	<title>Re:understanding is critical here</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1261166580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've visit a nearby Culver's for WiFi over some of my lunch breaks.</p><p>Despite being very near the local cable company and getting their access from them (TWC Road Runner, had to use a reverse traceroute to confirm as pings and traceroutes are blocked from going out), most times I can't get anywhere from there. There is no click-through login web page (which prevents some classes of devices from using free WiFi) but often by the time I <em>can</em> get somewhere, I'm already done eating and am finishing my first refill of my soft drink and needing to get back to work. I suspect their DNS is unreliable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've visit a nearby Culver 's for WiFi over some of my lunch breaks.Despite being very near the local cable company and getting their access from them ( TWC Road Runner , had to use a reverse traceroute to confirm as pings and traceroutes are blocked from going out ) , most times I ca n't get anywhere from there .
There is no click-through login web page ( which prevents some classes of devices from using free WiFi ) but often by the time I can get somewhere , I 'm already done eating and am finishing my first refill of my soft drink and needing to get back to work .
I suspect their DNS is unreliable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've visit a nearby Culver's for WiFi over some of my lunch breaks.Despite being very near the local cable company and getting their access from them (TWC Road Runner, had to use a reverse traceroute to confirm as pings and traceroutes are blocked from going out), most times I can't get anywhere from there.
There is no click-through login web page (which prevents some classes of devices from using free WiFi) but often by the time I can get somewhere, I'm already done eating and am finishing my first refill of my soft drink and needing to get back to work.
I suspect their DNS is unreliable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496350</id>
	<title>Re:Expect bright lights</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1261154880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Equating geeks to crack addicts? <a href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/SCO\_Sues\_To\_Block\_Novell-SuSE\_Deal\_Threatens\_BSD\_Likens\_Linux\_Users\_To\_Drug/" title="macobserver.com">Is that you, Darl?</a> [macobserver.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Equating geeks to crack addicts ?
Is that you , Darl ?
[ macobserver.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Equating geeks to crack addicts?
Is that you, Darl?
[macobserver.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478</id>
	<title>understanding is critical here</title>
	<author>poetmatt</author>
	<datestamp>1261160820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>starbucks isn't charging for the WIFI. Some companies, however, are charging for the access. Panera does this - but I don't think they label it free wifi either.</p><p>So yeah, you have wifi, free and open, but it's still requiring a purchase at panera to just use the damn internet (which is horribly slow at their locations anyway).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>starbucks is n't charging for the WIFI .
Some companies , however , are charging for the access .
Panera does this - but I do n't think they label it free wifi either.So yeah , you have wifi , free and open , but it 's still requiring a purchase at panera to just use the damn internet ( which is horribly slow at their locations anyway ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>starbucks isn't charging for the WIFI.
Some companies, however, are charging for the access.
Panera does this - but I don't think they label it free wifi either.So yeah, you have wifi, free and open, but it's still requiring a purchase at panera to just use the damn internet (which is horribly slow at their locations anyway).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30497968</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>Scannerman</author>
	<datestamp>1261230720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you kidding?</p><p>I work in that grey area between engineering and sales, and have spent a lot of the time on the road in the UK and Australia (Both have had this for years) We almost always meet up in McDonalds, so that we can check E-mails etc while waiting.</p><p>Inevitably there are a few other doing the same thing. I reckon this must get them at least an extra 20 or so meals per day per branch.</p><p>I'm amazed this is only just coming in in the US,I'd assumed they started it there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you kidding ? I work in that grey area between engineering and sales , and have spent a lot of the time on the road in the UK and Australia ( Both have had this for years ) We almost always meet up in McDonalds , so that we can check E-mails etc while waiting.Inevitably there are a few other doing the same thing .
I reckon this must get them at least an extra 20 or so meals per day per branch.I 'm amazed this is only just coming in in the US,I 'd assumed they started it there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you kidding?I work in that grey area between engineering and sales, and have spent a lot of the time on the road in the UK and Australia (Both have had this for years) We almost always meet up in McDonalds, so that we can check E-mails etc while waiting.Inevitably there are a few other doing the same thing.
I reckon this must get them at least an extra 20 or so meals per day per branch.I'm amazed this is only just coming in in the US,I'd assumed they started it there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490868</id>
	<title>all in one stop</title>
	<author>angelwolf71885</author>
	<datestamp>1261165380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>FAT PORN and WoW all in one stop</htmltext>
<tokenext>FAT PORN and WoW all in one stop</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FAT PORN and WoW all in one stop</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494912</id>
	<title>Re:Terrible idea</title>
	<author>dotgain</author>
	<datestamp>1261140000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No no no, you're doing it wrong.  Here, I'll show you:<blockquote><div><p>IN SOVIET RUSSIA, 802 DOT ELEVEN FUCK Q!</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No no no , you 're doing it wrong .
Here , I 'll show you : IN SOVIET RUSSIA , 802 DOT ELEVEN FUCK Q !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No no no, you're doing it wrong.
Here, I'll show you:IN SOVIET RUSSIA, 802 DOT ELEVEN FUCK Q!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490038</id>
	<title>Terrible idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All McDonalds in Russia that do have wifi, provide it for free. As a result, a lot of people take their notebook, buy a small soda (or even nothing at all) and surf the net for hours. As a result, a lot of tables are occupied, especially on evenings and weekends, sometimes only a few tables are actually used for eating, forming lines of angry people with heavy trays waiting for a chair to sit on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All McDonalds in Russia that do have wifi , provide it for free .
As a result , a lot of people take their notebook , buy a small soda ( or even nothing at all ) and surf the net for hours .
As a result , a lot of tables are occupied , especially on evenings and weekends , sometimes only a few tables are actually used for eating , forming lines of angry people with heavy trays waiting for a chair to sit on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All McDonalds in Russia that do have wifi, provide it for free.
As a result, a lot of people take their notebook, buy a small soda (or even nothing at all) and surf the net for hours.
As a result, a lot of tables are occupied, especially on evenings and weekends, sometimes only a few tables are actually used for eating, forming lines of angry people with heavy trays waiting for a chair to sit on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496282</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>lena\_10326</author>
	<datestamp>1261153920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I always just assumed that they didn't actually want people hanging out. "Get your burger and get the f* out".</p></div></blockquote><p>That's what drive through is for.</p><p>Also, it's spelled "fuck".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always just assumed that they did n't actually want people hanging out .
" Get your burger and get the f * out " .That 's what drive through is for.Also , it 's spelled " fuck " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always just assumed that they didn't actually want people hanging out.
"Get your burger and get the f* out".That's what drive through is for.Also, it's spelled "fuck".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491598</id>
	<title>what a turnaround</title>
	<author>Wansu</author>
	<datestamp>1261168260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Been in a McDonalds lately? I was real surprised when I went to one recently. They have better coffee than Starbucks. Their food is better. The place is clean. I had pretty much written them off. They've changed from the top down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Been in a McDonalds lately ?
I was real surprised when I went to one recently .
They have better coffee than Starbucks .
Their food is better .
The place is clean .
I had pretty much written them off .
They 've changed from the top down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Been in a McDonalds lately?
I was real surprised when I went to one recently.
They have better coffee than Starbucks.
Their food is better.
The place is clean.
I had pretty much written them off.
They've changed from the top down.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</id>
	<title>Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1261160940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For everytime I wished I had Wifi when I was at McDonalds... I'd have the exact same amount of money I do now.</p><p>You see, Coffee Shops like Starbucks make sense. Thats where you go to prop open your laptop, pretend to be a professional writer while blogging, while pompously talking to other "professional writers" over your Peppermint Mocha Extra Pump Extra hot no foam Chai Late Fusion Coffee.</p><p>There is nothing Arrogant or pompous about pretending to write while stuffing down a big mac.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For everytime I wished I had Wifi when I was at McDonalds... I 'd have the exact same amount of money I do now.You see , Coffee Shops like Starbucks make sense .
Thats where you go to prop open your laptop , pretend to be a professional writer while blogging , while pompously talking to other " professional writers " over your Peppermint Mocha Extra Pump Extra hot no foam Chai Late Fusion Coffee.There is nothing Arrogant or pompous about pretending to write while stuffing down a big mac .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For everytime I wished I had Wifi when I was at McDonalds... I'd have the exact same amount of money I do now.You see, Coffee Shops like Starbucks make sense.
Thats where you go to prop open your laptop, pretend to be a professional writer while blogging, while pompously talking to other "professional writers" over your Peppermint Mocha Extra Pump Extra hot no foam Chai Late Fusion Coffee.There is nothing Arrogant or pompous about pretending to write while stuffing down a big mac.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490286</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>alienzed</author>
	<datestamp>1261163340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The free wifi might not but the fired burger might make you eat a fried burger.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The free wifi might not but the fired burger might make you eat a fried burger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The free wifi might not but the fired burger might make you eat a fried burger.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30498870</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>trickyD1ck</author>
	<datestamp>1261242900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is there anyone else here who eats fries because of the vitamins?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there anyone else here who eats fries because of the vitamins ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there anyone else here who eats fries because of the vitamins?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490872</id>
	<title>Re:might actually go to a mcdonalds</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1261165380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Angus burger IS decent.<br>As is the Sirloin burger from Jack in the Box.<br>And whatever Carl's Jr. is pimping.</p><p>But I find myself just going to Jack in the Box and getting their Big Cheeseburger and a small order of fries.</p><p>It's just a big cheeseburger with ketchup and an oniony mayo sauce.  No useless vegetables to get in the way and make things messier and crappier tasting.  I get it without the ketchup (because ketchup is disgusting) and easy on the oniony mayo stuff (they like to pile it on).</p><p>I have soda at home, so no need to pay for it there.  Total comes out to $2.49 after tax, and I get to order from the touchscreens they have, so I can tell the MACHINE to not put ketchup on my burger, yes I want fries no I don't want a combo, etc.</p><p>I get a burger quickly, for cheap, and I don't have to deal with the high school drop outs who don't speak English, take forever to take my order, etc.</p><p>The point is you can find something you'll like at any of the major chains.  The larger factors in choice for me are the convenience, the quality (within a chain, quality can be vastly different at two different locations), and the amount I have to deal with the staff.  The food itself?  Just gimme my burger, or perhaps my various forms of fried chicken.</p><p>Free wifi?  Most people who would give a shit would be people who already have a data connection via their cell phone.  And I'm not gonna die from lack of intertrons in the 5 minutes or less that I hope to be at your restaurant if I don't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Angus burger IS decent.As is the Sirloin burger from Jack in the Box.And whatever Carl 's Jr. is pimping.But I find myself just going to Jack in the Box and getting their Big Cheeseburger and a small order of fries.It 's just a big cheeseburger with ketchup and an oniony mayo sauce .
No useless vegetables to get in the way and make things messier and crappier tasting .
I get it without the ketchup ( because ketchup is disgusting ) and easy on the oniony mayo stuff ( they like to pile it on ) .I have soda at home , so no need to pay for it there .
Total comes out to $ 2.49 after tax , and I get to order from the touchscreens they have , so I can tell the MACHINE to not put ketchup on my burger , yes I want fries no I do n't want a combo , etc.I get a burger quickly , for cheap , and I do n't have to deal with the high school drop outs who do n't speak English , take forever to take my order , etc.The point is you can find something you 'll like at any of the major chains .
The larger factors in choice for me are the convenience , the quality ( within a chain , quality can be vastly different at two different locations ) , and the amount I have to deal with the staff .
The food itself ?
Just gim me my burger , or perhaps my various forms of fried chicken.Free wifi ?
Most people who would give a shit would be people who already have a data connection via their cell phone .
And I 'm not gon na die from lack of intertrons in the 5 minutes or less that I hope to be at your restaurant if I do n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Angus burger IS decent.As is the Sirloin burger from Jack in the Box.And whatever Carl's Jr. is pimping.But I find myself just going to Jack in the Box and getting their Big Cheeseburger and a small order of fries.It's just a big cheeseburger with ketchup and an oniony mayo sauce.
No useless vegetables to get in the way and make things messier and crappier tasting.
I get it without the ketchup (because ketchup is disgusting) and easy on the oniony mayo stuff (they like to pile it on).I have soda at home, so no need to pay for it there.
Total comes out to $2.49 after tax, and I get to order from the touchscreens they have, so I can tell the MACHINE to not put ketchup on my burger, yes I want fries no I don't want a combo, etc.I get a burger quickly, for cheap, and I don't have to deal with the high school drop outs who don't speak English, take forever to take my order, etc.The point is you can find something you'll like at any of the major chains.
The larger factors in choice for me are the convenience, the quality (within a chain, quality can be vastly different at two different locations), and the amount I have to deal with the staff.
The food itself?
Just gimme my burger, or perhaps my various forms of fried chicken.Free wifi?
Most people who would give a shit would be people who already have a data connection via their cell phone.
And I'm not gonna die from lack of intertrons in the 5 minutes or less that I hope to be at your restaurant if I don't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493464</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261131960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In their early years, Arby's was decent (not great though). Back "in the good old days", they used "real" roast beef rather than than the press formed crap they use today.
<br> <br>
When I was a kid, our family would eat at Arby's fairly often (probably two or three times a month) and one day we noticed the sandwiches didn't taste very good. We went back one more time with the same result. We inquired and were told that they had switched to a "processed" roast beef - and the store manager actually seemed quite proud of this "new improvement". Our family never ate at an Arby's again.
<br> <br>
I think they switched sometime in the very late 60's - so, since they were founded in 1964 (at least according to their web site), they didn't stick with real meat very long.
<br> <br>
Out of misguided curiosity (or possibly a masochistic streak), I ate at an Arby's about ten years ago as I figured that if they were still in business they <i>must</i> have gone back to "real" meat (or something closer to it at least). It turns out my powers of deduction were incorrect and I think the "meat" product was even worse than it had been (but maybe my palette is just a bit more refined now).
<br> <br>
Now, get off my lawn.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In their early years , Arby 's was decent ( not great though ) .
Back " in the good old days " , they used " real " roast beef rather than than the press formed crap they use today .
When I was a kid , our family would eat at Arby 's fairly often ( probably two or three times a month ) and one day we noticed the sandwiches did n't taste very good .
We went back one more time with the same result .
We inquired and were told that they had switched to a " processed " roast beef - and the store manager actually seemed quite proud of this " new improvement " .
Our family never ate at an Arby 's again .
I think they switched sometime in the very late 60 's - so , since they were founded in 1964 ( at least according to their web site ) , they did n't stick with real meat very long .
Out of misguided curiosity ( or possibly a masochistic streak ) , I ate at an Arby 's about ten years ago as I figured that if they were still in business they must have gone back to " real " meat ( or something closer to it at least ) .
It turns out my powers of deduction were incorrect and I think the " meat " product was even worse than it had been ( but maybe my palette is just a bit more refined now ) .
Now , get off my lawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In their early years, Arby's was decent (not great though).
Back "in the good old days", they used "real" roast beef rather than than the press formed crap they use today.
When I was a kid, our family would eat at Arby's fairly often (probably two or three times a month) and one day we noticed the sandwiches didn't taste very good.
We went back one more time with the same result.
We inquired and were told that they had switched to a "processed" roast beef - and the store manager actually seemed quite proud of this "new improvement".
Our family never ate at an Arby's again.
I think they switched sometime in the very late 60's - so, since they were founded in 1964 (at least according to their web site), they didn't stick with real meat very long.
Out of misguided curiosity (or possibly a masochistic streak), I ate at an Arby's about ten years ago as I figured that if they were still in business they must have gone back to "real" meat (or something closer to it at least).
It turns out my powers of deduction were incorrect and I think the "meat" product was even worse than it had been (but maybe my palette is just a bit more refined now).
Now, get off my lawn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489892</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There is nothing Arrogant or pompous about pretending to write while stuffing down a big mac.</p></div><p>That's why I don't try to look arrogant or pompous when I work on code while I wait for slow eaters in the family to finish eating. I see three kinds of slow eaters: single-digit-year-old kids who got a Happy Meal and are still playing with their food and/or promotional toy, senior citizens whose worn-out bodies just do everything slowly, and senior citizens' nearly-senior daughters who like to gossip about various people's personal lives.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is nothing Arrogant or pompous about pretending to write while stuffing down a big mac.That 's why I do n't try to look arrogant or pompous when I work on code while I wait for slow eaters in the family to finish eating .
I see three kinds of slow eaters : single-digit-year-old kids who got a Happy Meal and are still playing with their food and/or promotional toy , senior citizens whose worn-out bodies just do everything slowly , and senior citizens ' nearly-senior daughters who like to gossip about various people 's personal lives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is nothing Arrogant or pompous about pretending to write while stuffing down a big mac.That's why I don't try to look arrogant or pompous when I work on code while I wait for slow eaters in the family to finish eating.
I see three kinds of slow eaters: single-digit-year-old kids who got a Happy Meal and are still playing with their food and/or promotional toy, senior citizens whose worn-out bodies just do everything slowly, and senior citizens' nearly-senior daughters who like to gossip about various people's personal lives.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489972</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>And yes, there are many people out there without a smartphone or who want slightly faster internet.</i> <br> <br>Or people like me with a smartphone who have no data plan and have per-use data blocked because AT&amp;T charges too damn much.  Wifi works fine and is generally available most places I go.  It's not like I can browse the web while driving down the highway anyhow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And yes , there are many people out there without a smartphone or who want slightly faster internet .
Or people like me with a smartphone who have no data plan and have per-use data blocked because AT&amp;T charges too damn much .
Wifi works fine and is generally available most places I go .
It 's not like I can browse the web while driving down the highway anyhow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And yes, there are many people out there without a smartphone or who want slightly faster internet.
Or people like me with a smartphone who have no data plan and have per-use data blocked because AT&amp;T charges too damn much.
Wifi works fine and is generally available most places I go.
It's not like I can browse the web while driving down the highway anyhow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493372</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261131660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I the only person who has completely free wi-fi at my local McDonald's? I've met people at it a couple times purely to use wi-fi, never even setting foot inside.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only person who has completely free wi-fi at my local McDonald 's ?
I 've met people at it a couple times purely to use wi-fi , never even setting foot inside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only person who has completely free wi-fi at my local McDonald's?
I've met people at it a couple times purely to use wi-fi, never even setting foot inside.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492200</id>
	<title>Re:It's the expensive places that still charge for</title>
	<author>hackel</author>
	<datestamp>1261127100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is exactly right.  And it's not only wifi, they charge extra for pool/health club access, no free breakfast, parking like you already mentioned, sometimes they even charge for airport shuttles!  It really is insane.  I always try to avoid those hotels if I can...  Sure, they might have fluffy beds and fancy marble showers, but the rest of the service is just terrible...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is exactly right .
And it 's not only wifi , they charge extra for pool/health club access , no free breakfast , parking like you already mentioned , sometimes they even charge for airport shuttles !
It really is insane .
I always try to avoid those hotels if I can... Sure , they might have fluffy beds and fancy marble showers , but the rest of the service is just terrible.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is exactly right.
And it's not only wifi, they charge extra for pool/health club access, no free breakfast, parking like you already mentioned, sometimes they even charge for airport shuttles!
It really is insane.
I always try to avoid those hotels if I can...  Sure, they might have fluffy beds and fancy marble showers, but the rest of the service is just terrible...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491446</id>
	<title>Re:understanding is critical here</title>
	<author>cjonslashdot</author>
	<datestamp>1261167540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As far as I know Starbucks wifi is not free. (I use it in the Washington DC area.) I use it daily but I am an AT&amp;T wifi subscriber and for me it is well worth it. To use it free in a Starbucks you have to register your Starbucks card (I think you have to do that ahead of time, but I have not checked lately), and then you get two hours of use if you buy something and go through the process of requesting that a code be sent to you via a text message and then you log on with that code. If the Starbucks is attached to a Barnes &amp; Noble, then the wifi is free because B&amp;N has free wifi via AT&amp;T. Panera wifi is free. Cosi has free wifi too, but they block SMTP so you can't email unless you use webmail. The Starbucks wifi in my area (many locations) used to be really, really, really unreliable on a chronic basis, but it has gotten a-lot better very recently (past few weeks) in my area: they must be improving their setup. Note that the TurboChef convection ovens used at Starbucks sometimes interfere with the wifi signal, so during the morning breakfast rush when people are requesting egg muffin things the wifi can be zapped. Also, B&amp;N wifi disconnects you about once an hour, requiring you to log on again (requires you to go through several screens). Starbucks/B&amp;N wifi is quite fast: you can stream music with no problem, but don't try downloading an HD video. Cosi's wifi is not very fast. Don't recall for Panera.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as I know Starbucks wifi is not free .
( I use it in the Washington DC area .
) I use it daily but I am an AT&amp;T wifi subscriber and for me it is well worth it .
To use it free in a Starbucks you have to register your Starbucks card ( I think you have to do that ahead of time , but I have not checked lately ) , and then you get two hours of use if you buy something and go through the process of requesting that a code be sent to you via a text message and then you log on with that code .
If the Starbucks is attached to a Barnes &amp; Noble , then the wifi is free because B&amp;N has free wifi via AT&amp;T .
Panera wifi is free .
Cosi has free wifi too , but they block SMTP so you ca n't email unless you use webmail .
The Starbucks wifi in my area ( many locations ) used to be really , really , really unreliable on a chronic basis , but it has gotten a-lot better very recently ( past few weeks ) in my area : they must be improving their setup .
Note that the TurboChef convection ovens used at Starbucks sometimes interfere with the wifi signal , so during the morning breakfast rush when people are requesting egg muffin things the wifi can be zapped .
Also , B&amp;N wifi disconnects you about once an hour , requiring you to log on again ( requires you to go through several screens ) .
Starbucks/B&amp;N wifi is quite fast : you can stream music with no problem , but do n't try downloading an HD video .
Cosi 's wifi is not very fast .
Do n't recall for Panera .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as I know Starbucks wifi is not free.
(I use it in the Washington DC area.
) I use it daily but I am an AT&amp;T wifi subscriber and for me it is well worth it.
To use it free in a Starbucks you have to register your Starbucks card (I think you have to do that ahead of time, but I have not checked lately), and then you get two hours of use if you buy something and go through the process of requesting that a code be sent to you via a text message and then you log on with that code.
If the Starbucks is attached to a Barnes &amp; Noble, then the wifi is free because B&amp;N has free wifi via AT&amp;T.
Panera wifi is free.
Cosi has free wifi too, but they block SMTP so you can't email unless you use webmail.
The Starbucks wifi in my area (many locations) used to be really, really, really unreliable on a chronic basis, but it has gotten a-lot better very recently (past few weeks) in my area: they must be improving their setup.
Note that the TurboChef convection ovens used at Starbucks sometimes interfere with the wifi signal, so during the morning breakfast rush when people are requesting egg muffin things the wifi can be zapped.
Also, B&amp;N wifi disconnects you about once an hour, requiring you to log on again (requires you to go through several screens).
Starbucks/B&amp;N wifi is quite fast: you can stream music with no problem, but don't try downloading an HD video.
Cosi's wifi is not very fast.
Don't recall for Panera.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491130</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>Marriedman</author>
	<datestamp>1261166280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry to disappoint you, but that is not *real* roast beef. I worked at an Arby's while in college. If you notice, there is never any marbling in the beef. It is a processed meat product.
<br> <br>From the Arby's website, under "printable ingredients list" <br>Roast Beef: Trimmed Boneless Beef Chunks (Minimum 70\%) Combined With Chopped Beef For a Maximum of 12\% Fat. Contains up to 9.0\% of a Self-Basting Solution of Water, Salt, Sodium Phosphate.<br> <br>It looks a lot like spam when we used to cut it out of the plastic wrap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry to disappoint you , but that is not * real * roast beef .
I worked at an Arby 's while in college .
If you notice , there is never any marbling in the beef .
It is a processed meat product .
From the Arby 's website , under " printable ingredients list " Roast Beef : Trimmed Boneless Beef Chunks ( Minimum 70 \ % ) Combined With Chopped Beef For a Maximum of 12 \ % Fat .
Contains up to 9.0 \ % of a Self-Basting Solution of Water , Salt , Sodium Phosphate .
It looks a lot like spam when we used to cut it out of the plastic wrap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry to disappoint you, but that is not *real* roast beef.
I worked at an Arby's while in college.
If you notice, there is never any marbling in the beef.
It is a processed meat product.
From the Arby's website, under "printable ingredients list" Roast Beef: Trimmed Boneless Beef Chunks (Minimum 70\%) Combined With Chopped Beef For a Maximum of 12\% Fat.
Contains up to 9.0\% of a Self-Basting Solution of Water, Salt, Sodium Phosphate.
It looks a lot like spam when we used to cut it out of the plastic wrap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491820</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1261168980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's probably why there's no time limitation. The hard plastic seats take care of that for them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's probably why there 's no time limitation .
The hard plastic seats take care of that for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's probably why there's no time limitation.
The hard plastic seats take care of that for them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492556</id>
	<title>Re:It's the expensive places that still charge for</title>
	<author>greyhueofdoubt</author>
	<datestamp>1261128300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willingness\_to\_pay" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willingness\_to\_pay</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>If you willing to dish out $500+ per night for a double queen room, then you're probably ok with $13 per night wifi and $32 cheeseburgers (Actual prices from a hilton I stayed at).</p><p>I was sent on a short-notice (36 hours) emergency deployment to hawaii a while back; base housing was under construction so we had to stay downtown. I wound up living in the Waikiki Beach Hilton for about 2 months. That sounds great, and for the most part it was, but I was an E-5 living in an environment designed for the very rich. I had a nice view of the beach, yes, but like I said earlier the internet prices were outrageous. It turned out to be much cheaper to find a local t-mobile store and buy a usb wireless internet dongle. A month later I returned it and ultimately wound up paying only for the one month of service with no termination fee (under 30 days trial period).</p><p>-b</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willingness \ _to \ _pay [ wikipedia.org ] If you willing to dish out $ 500 + per night for a double queen room , then you 're probably ok with $ 13 per night wifi and $ 32 cheeseburgers ( Actual prices from a hilton I stayed at ) .I was sent on a short-notice ( 36 hours ) emergency deployment to hawaii a while back ; base housing was under construction so we had to stay downtown .
I wound up living in the Waikiki Beach Hilton for about 2 months .
That sounds great , and for the most part it was , but I was an E-5 living in an environment designed for the very rich .
I had a nice view of the beach , yes , but like I said earlier the internet prices were outrageous .
It turned out to be much cheaper to find a local t-mobile store and buy a usb wireless internet dongle .
A month later I returned it and ultimately wound up paying only for the one month of service with no termination fee ( under 30 days trial period ) .-b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willingness\_to\_pay [wikipedia.org]If you willing to dish out $500+ per night for a double queen room, then you're probably ok with $13 per night wifi and $32 cheeseburgers (Actual prices from a hilton I stayed at).I was sent on a short-notice (36 hours) emergency deployment to hawaii a while back; base housing was under construction so we had to stay downtown.
I wound up living in the Waikiki Beach Hilton for about 2 months.
That sounds great, and for the most part it was, but I was an E-5 living in an environment designed for the very rich.
I had a nice view of the beach, yes, but like I said earlier the internet prices were outrageous.
It turned out to be much cheaper to find a local t-mobile store and buy a usb wireless internet dongle.
A month later I returned it and ultimately wound up paying only for the one month of service with no termination fee (under 30 days trial period).-b</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496952</id>
	<title>Fire good...</title>
	<author>KingAlanI</author>
	<datestamp>1261164240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Flame Broiled, or nothing.</p></div><p>Get off your butt and generate the flame part with your own damn propane. About the least complicated actual cooking there is.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<br>(although I admit I'm too lazy for charcoal.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Flame Broiled , or nothing.Get off your butt and generate the flame part with your own damn propane .
About the least complicated actual cooking there is .
: ) ( although I admit I 'm too lazy for charcoal .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flame Broiled, or nothing.Get off your butt and generate the flame part with your own damn propane.
About the least complicated actual cooking there is.
:)(although I admit I'm too lazy for charcoal.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489730</id>
	<title>Re:Man, If I had a nickle...</title>
	<author>King Coopa</author>
	<datestamp>1261161600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It does make since as a marketing plot.  It's just more reason for someone to enter a McD's who ordinarily would not.
For example, I have an ipod touch.  There are numerous times I've drove around in a different city where I had to keep a lookout for a Starbucks so I could use their wifi to look up an address on google maps.  A few times I wound buying a cookie or something.  Had they not had free wifi I would have never made those purchases.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It does make since as a marketing plot .
It 's just more reason for someone to enter a McD 's who ordinarily would not .
For example , I have an ipod touch .
There are numerous times I 've drove around in a different city where I had to keep a lookout for a Starbucks so I could use their wifi to look up an address on google maps .
A few times I wound buying a cookie or something .
Had they not had free wifi I would have never made those purchases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It does make since as a marketing plot.
It's just more reason for someone to enter a McD's who ordinarily would not.
For example, I have an ipod touch.
There are numerous times I've drove around in a different city where I had to keep a lookout for a Starbucks so I could use their wifi to look up an address on google maps.
A few times I wound buying a cookie or something.
Had they not had free wifi I would have never made those purchases.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495564</id>
	<title>Re:Expect bright lights</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261146240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My guess is geeks leaching wifi will need to be repelled in the same way, and for much the same reasons.</p></div><p>That's an easy one. Just put Coldplay, Muse, The Black-Eyed Peas &amp; The Sugababes on loop in stores.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My guess is geeks leaching wifi will need to be repelled in the same way , and for much the same reasons.That 's an easy one .
Just put Coldplay , Muse , The Black-Eyed Peas &amp; The Sugababes on loop in stores .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My guess is geeks leaching wifi will need to be repelled in the same way, and for much the same reasons.That's an easy one.
Just put Coldplay, Muse, The Black-Eyed Peas &amp; The Sugababes on loop in stores.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489500</id>
	<title>Does that make my...</title>
	<author>stakovahflow</author>
	<datestamp>1261160940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cracked account invalid? Dang it! --Stak</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cracked account invalid ?
Dang it !
--Stak</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cracked account invalid?
Dang it!
--Stak</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489778</id>
	<title>What will MAFIAA do when they trace p2p to McDs?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261161720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sue McDs? Will McDs have any filtering?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sue McDs ?
Will McDs have any filtering ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sue McDs?
Will McDs have any filtering?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492416</id>
	<title>Re:Long Enough</title>
	<author>Again</author>
	<datestamp>1261127760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One way to make the fries edible is to sit there until they make a fresh batch (warning: this might take a long time) and ask for fries before they put salt on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One way to make the fries edible is to sit there until they make a fresh batch ( warning : this might take a long time ) and ask for fries before they put salt on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One way to make the fries edible is to sit there until they make a fresh batch (warning: this might take a long time) and ask for fries before they put salt on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489446</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489764</id>
	<title>Re:No Purchase Required?</title>
	<author>jbacon</author>
	<datestamp>1261161660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, the word 'customer' does not necessarily imply that money must be spent.  What the sign actually means is said person must be making use of or receiving a product or service of McDonald's.  Since the free WiFi is offered by McDonald's, that would be a service offered by that company.  QED, you may park.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , the word 'customer ' does not necessarily imply that money must be spent .
What the sign actually means is said person must be making use of or receiving a product or service of McDonald 's .
Since the free WiFi is offered by McDonald 's , that would be a service offered by that company .
QED , you may park .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, the word 'customer' does not necessarily imply that money must be spent.
What the sign actually means is said person must be making use of or receiving a product or service of McDonald's.
Since the free WiFi is offered by McDonald's, that would be a service offered by that company.
QED, you may park.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496986</id>
	<title>Other burger joints</title>
	<author>KingAlanI</author>
	<datestamp>1261164660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know "regular" restaurants do often include burgers on their menu, but there seem to be places inbetween: better burgers than the fast-food joints, but not quite the slower service or higher prices of regular restaurants.<br>Bill Gray's and Tom Wahl's are, for me, local examples.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know " regular " restaurants do often include burgers on their menu , but there seem to be places inbetween : better burgers than the fast-food joints , but not quite the slower service or higher prices of regular restaurants.Bill Gray 's and Tom Wahl 's are , for me , local examples .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know "regular" restaurants do often include burgers on their menu, but there seem to be places inbetween: better burgers than the fast-food joints, but not quite the slower service or higher prices of regular restaurants.Bill Gray's and Tom Wahl's are, for me, local examples.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491658</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is changing.  Two of the McDonalds establishments in my (US) town recently remodelled, and now have not only padding on their seats, but a pair of cushy, lounge-ish chairs with a low table, near a window with a view.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is changing .
Two of the McDonalds establishments in my ( US ) town recently remodelled , and now have not only padding on their seats , but a pair of cushy , lounge-ish chairs with a low table , near a window with a view .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is changing.
Two of the McDonalds establishments in my (US) town recently remodelled, and now have not only padding on their seats, but a pair of cushy, lounge-ish chairs with a low table, near a window with a view.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493066</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261130400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are talking about McDonalds?</p><p>As far as I can tell, the fries totally suck both at McDonalds from UK and germany. They are utterly... soft. *uggh*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are talking about McDonalds ? As far as I can tell , the fries totally suck both at McDonalds from UK and germany .
They are utterly... soft. * uggh *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are talking about McDonalds?As far as I can tell, the fries totally suck both at McDonalds from UK and germany.
They are utterly... soft. *uggh*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489648</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261161420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's hope more big chains offer open WiFi in the UK. They have enough money to make sure such travesties as <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/nov/27/pub-file-sharing-cloud-fine" title="guardian.co.uk" rel="nofollow">Pub fined &pound;8,000 for customer's illicit downloads</a> [guardian.co.uk] don't happen very often, by lobbying for laws to protect open WiFi providers.</p><p>Which might one day protect you, dear reader!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's hope more big chains offer open WiFi in the UK .
They have enough money to make sure such travesties as Pub fined   8,000 for customer 's illicit downloads [ guardian.co.uk ] do n't happen very often , by lobbying for laws to protect open WiFi providers.Which might one day protect you , dear reader !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's hope more big chains offer open WiFi in the UK.
They have enough money to make sure such travesties as Pub fined £8,000 for customer's illicit downloads [guardian.co.uk] don't happen very often, by lobbying for laws to protect open WiFi providers.Which might one day protect you, dear reader!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491804</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>gnapster</author>
	<datestamp>1261168920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree, that would be quite great.  It could help eliminate the abiguity described in <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/networking/london-police-arrest-man-stealing-wi-fi-896" title="infoworld.com" rel="nofollow">this article</a> [infoworld.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , that would be quite great .
It could help eliminate the abiguity described in this article [ infoworld.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, that would be quite great.
It could help eliminate the abiguity described in this article [infoworld.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493330</id>
	<title>Re:What will MAFIAA do when they trace p2p to McDs</title>
	<author>Knowzy</author>
	<datestamp>1261131540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've never tried a BitTorrent or any other p2p app on McD Wi-Fi but they don't filter much on the outgoing side. I've used many services on non-standard ports, including SSH2 and cisco VPN and never had a problem.</p><p>You'll never get to listen on incoming port, though, so you'll always be a p2p leech on McD Wi-Fi.</p><p>Also, the network is centrally managed by AT&amp;T Wi-Fi (formerly Wayport). It's not like they're just throwing up a $50 router and forgetting about it. Certain activities may get their attention...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never tried a BitTorrent or any other p2p app on McD Wi-Fi but they do n't filter much on the outgoing side .
I 've used many services on non-standard ports , including SSH2 and cisco VPN and never had a problem.You 'll never get to listen on incoming port , though , so you 'll always be a p2p leech on McD Wi-Fi.Also , the network is centrally managed by AT&amp;T Wi-Fi ( formerly Wayport ) .
It 's not like they 're just throwing up a $ 50 router and forgetting about it .
Certain activities may get their attention.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never tried a BitTorrent or any other p2p app on McD Wi-Fi but they don't filter much on the outgoing side.
I've used many services on non-standard ports, including SSH2 and cisco VPN and never had a problem.You'll never get to listen on incoming port, though, so you'll always be a p2p leech on McD Wi-Fi.Also, the network is centrally managed by AT&amp;T Wi-Fi (formerly Wayport).
It's not like they're just throwing up a $50 router and forgetting about it.
Certain activities may get their attention...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490786</id>
	<title>Re:understanding is critical here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261165080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I walked into a Starbucks, bought a Hot Chocolate and then wanted WiFi only to find out that you need to buy a Starbucks (cash) Card.  Total BS; I don't want to give them $10 for WiFi after giving them my service.  Why they can't just offer an hour of WiFi to someone who buys something is beyond me.  If I liked coffee I'd boycott them; as it is, I'm never going into a Starbucks to try to get WiFi again.  So Starbucks may not be charging for their WiFi, but it sure isn't free to anyone who isn't a regular customer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I walked into a Starbucks , bought a Hot Chocolate and then wanted WiFi only to find out that you need to buy a Starbucks ( cash ) Card .
Total BS ; I do n't want to give them $ 10 for WiFi after giving them my service .
Why they ca n't just offer an hour of WiFi to someone who buys something is beyond me .
If I liked coffee I 'd boycott them ; as it is , I 'm never going into a Starbucks to try to get WiFi again .
So Starbucks may not be charging for their WiFi , but it sure is n't free to anyone who is n't a regular customer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I walked into a Starbucks, bought a Hot Chocolate and then wanted WiFi only to find out that you need to buy a Starbucks (cash) Card.
Total BS; I don't want to give them $10 for WiFi after giving them my service.
Why they can't just offer an hour of WiFi to someone who buys something is beyond me.
If I liked coffee I'd boycott them; as it is, I'm never going into a Starbucks to try to get WiFi again.
So Starbucks may not be charging for their WiFi, but it sure isn't free to anyone who isn't a regular customer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490094</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, after the new chicken sandwiches and the Angus burgers that McDonnalds now offers, I so freaking disagree.</p><p>Burger king tastes like it's been microwaved around here, and the iceberg lettuce heart that slides off the burger makes it... iieeeewww. Plus, what.. they put the mayo on with an ice cream scooper?</p><p>Not that I'm a big fan of either, but I have to admit, MD has stepped up their culinary game, and is pretty far ahead of Burger King in my book.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , after the new chicken sandwiches and the Angus burgers that McDonnalds now offers , I so freaking disagree.Burger king tastes like it 's been microwaved around here , and the iceberg lettuce heart that slides off the burger makes it... iieeeewww. Plus , what.. they put the mayo on with an ice cream scooper ? Not that I 'm a big fan of either , but I have to admit , MD has stepped up their culinary game , and is pretty far ahead of Burger King in my book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, after the new chicken sandwiches and the Angus burgers that McDonnalds now offers, I so freaking disagree.Burger king tastes like it's been microwaved around here, and the iceberg lettuce heart that slides off the burger makes it... iieeeewww. Plus, what.. they put the mayo on with an ice cream scooper?Not that I'm a big fan of either, but I have to admit, MD has stepped up their culinary game, and is pretty far ahead of Burger King in my book.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492114</id>
	<title>Be sure to wear a tin foil face mask</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1261126800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cruise the net while on Micky Dee's nationwide security camera</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cruise the net while on Micky Dee 's nationwide security camera</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cruise the net while on Micky Dee's nationwide security camera</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489964</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're just trying to start a flame war.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're just trying to start a flame war .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're just trying to start a flame war.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496650</id>
	<title>Re:Urban</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1261159500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>how often are you willing to reset your MAC address to get free McWiFi?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how often are you willing to reset your MAC address to get free McWiFi ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how often are you willing to reset your MAC address to get free McWiFi?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494390</id>
	<title>Another problem about to get MUCH worse...</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1261136820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some airports that have free Wi-Fi have seen an increase in people setting up Wi-Fi from the parking lots in an attempt to go on a Phishing expedition. They basically take advantage of people that don't really pay attention to what network they are connecting to.</p><p>Anyone really expect McDonald's customers to check such things?</p><p>McDonald's is simply making this as easy as possible. Buy a cup of coffee in the drive-thru, go back around to the parking lot, bait ya hook, and start Phishing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some airports that have free Wi-Fi have seen an increase in people setting up Wi-Fi from the parking lots in an attempt to go on a Phishing expedition .
They basically take advantage of people that do n't really pay attention to what network they are connecting to.Anyone really expect McDonald 's customers to check such things ? McDonald 's is simply making this as easy as possible .
Buy a cup of coffee in the drive-thru , go back around to the parking lot , bait ya hook , and start Phishing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some airports that have free Wi-Fi have seen an increase in people setting up Wi-Fi from the parking lots in an attempt to go on a Phishing expedition.
They basically take advantage of people that don't really pay attention to what network they are connecting to.Anyone really expect McDonald's customers to check such things?McDonald's is simply making this as easy as possible.
Buy a cup of coffee in the drive-thru, go back around to the parking lot, bait ya hook, and start Phishing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490432</id>
	<title>Free WiFi but..</title>
	<author>dave562</author>
	<datestamp>1261163820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..they will still charge for extra ketchup and McNugget sauces.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..they will still charge for extra ketchup and McNugget sauces .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..they will still charge for extra ketchup and McNugget sauces.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490228</id>
	<title>might actually go to a mcdonalds</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261163100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I went to McDonalds in 2002 cause my girlfriend really had to use the toilet, and the squatters we were staying with had no working plumbing. They were pooing into bags in their non working bathroom then throwing them into church playgrounds. I bought a milkshake so she wouldn't have to do the poo bag thing.  I went to a McDonalds on the champs de elysee in 1999 cause hey, wouldn't it be funny to eat at a french mcd's, especially in view of the arc de triomphe.  (I had to look up both of those to spell them correctly.) So basically, if pooing or irony weren't involved, you couldn't drag me into a McD's. However, now the nytimes food critic says the angus burger is decent, AND they have free wifi. I find myself suddenly conflicted. But, because of my snobbish liberal elitism, I probably won't end up there, anyway. That and cause I'm a vegetarian. Why do I even read slashdot for fucks sake?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I went to McDonalds in 2002 cause my girlfriend really had to use the toilet , and the squatters we were staying with had no working plumbing .
They were pooing into bags in their non working bathroom then throwing them into church playgrounds .
I bought a milkshake so she would n't have to do the poo bag thing .
I went to a McDonalds on the champs de elysee in 1999 cause hey , would n't it be funny to eat at a french mcd 's , especially in view of the arc de triomphe .
( I had to look up both of those to spell them correctly .
) So basically , if pooing or irony were n't involved , you could n't drag me into a McD 's .
However , now the nytimes food critic says the angus burger is decent , AND they have free wifi .
I find myself suddenly conflicted .
But , because of my snobbish liberal elitism , I probably wo n't end up there , anyway .
That and cause I 'm a vegetarian .
Why do I even read slashdot for fucks sake ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I went to McDonalds in 2002 cause my girlfriend really had to use the toilet, and the squatters we were staying with had no working plumbing.
They were pooing into bags in their non working bathroom then throwing them into church playgrounds.
I bought a milkshake so she wouldn't have to do the poo bag thing.
I went to a McDonalds on the champs de elysee in 1999 cause hey, wouldn't it be funny to eat at a french mcd's, especially in view of the arc de triomphe.
(I had to look up both of those to spell them correctly.
) So basically, if pooing or irony weren't involved, you couldn't drag me into a McD's.
However, now the nytimes food critic says the angus burger is decent, AND they have free wifi.
I find myself suddenly conflicted.
But, because of my snobbish liberal elitism, I probably won't end up there, anyway.
That and cause I'm a vegetarian.
Why do I even read slashdot for fucks sake?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490194</id>
	<title>I wonder....</title>
	<author>Splintercat</author>
	<datestamp>1261162980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how much of their bandwidth will be taken up by lol cats and tweens nabbing the latest $CurrentPopArtist Album?</p><p>Money down McDonald's will never get nailed by the *IAA's for people downloading content on their networks.  If I left my wifi at home open to everyone and someone nabbed a movie or something off of it, you'd bet it'd be my ass that'd get in trouble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how much of their bandwidth will be taken up by lol cats and tweens nabbing the latest $ CurrentPopArtist Album ? Money down McDonald 's will never get nailed by the * IAA 's for people downloading content on their networks .
If I left my wifi at home open to everyone and someone nabbed a movie or something off of it , you 'd bet it 'd be my ass that 'd get in trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how much of their bandwidth will be taken up by lol cats and tweens nabbing the latest $CurrentPopArtist Album?Money down McDonald's will never get nailed by the *IAA's for people downloading content on their networks.
If I left my wifi at home open to everyone and someone nabbed a movie or something off of it, you'd bet it'd be my ass that'd get in trouble.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489916</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1261162140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Easy solution: Find a Burger King located close to a McDonald's, then eat the Burger King food while surfing using McDonald's WiFi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Easy solution : Find a Burger King located close to a McDonald 's , then eat the Burger King food while surfing using McDonald 's WiFi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Easy solution: Find a Burger King located close to a McDonald's, then eat the Burger King food while surfing using McDonald's WiFi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491378</id>
	<title>Table turn</title>
	<author>snowwrestler</author>
	<datestamp>1261167300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Restaurants make money by turning tables. A customer sitting at a table sipping coffee for 2 hours over lunch might prevent several other people from getting a seat and ordering a full lunch.</p><p>I haven't seen a full McDonalds for years though. My guess is that they looked at their numbers, saw that there were almost always open seats, and figured they had more to gain than lose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Restaurants make money by turning tables .
A customer sitting at a table sipping coffee for 2 hours over lunch might prevent several other people from getting a seat and ordering a full lunch.I have n't seen a full McDonalds for years though .
My guess is that they looked at their numbers , saw that there were almost always open seats , and figured they had more to gain than lose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Restaurants make money by turning tables.
A customer sitting at a table sipping coffee for 2 hours over lunch might prevent several other people from getting a seat and ordering a full lunch.I haven't seen a full McDonalds for years though.
My guess is that they looked at their numbers, saw that there were almost always open seats, and figured they had more to gain than lose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489926</id>
	<title>Re:Burger King is still better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, but the fries are the best out there</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but the fries are the best out there</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but the fries are the best out there</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489446</id>
	<title>Long Enough</title>
	<author>jlechem</author>
	<datestamp>1261160700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You sit there long enough and a big mac and fries start to look pretty good.......</htmltext>
<tokenext>You sit there long enough and a big mac and fries start to look pretty good...... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You sit there long enough and a big mac and fries start to look pretty good.......</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489432</id>
	<title>Now I might eat there again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261160700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493734</id>
	<title>McDrunk</title>
	<author>flahwho</author>
	<datestamp>1261133340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Free as in Free Beer?<br> <br>
"...I'll have a large Big &amp; Tasty meal and a McMillerLite."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Free as in Free Beer ?
" ...I 'll have a large Big &amp; Tasty meal and a McMillerLite .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free as in Free Beer?
"...I'll have a large Big &amp; Tasty meal and a McMillerLite.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491786</id>
	<title>Re:We have this in the UK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was huge for me. I took a vacation to the UK this summer, for 14 days. I had a netbook with me, which I used for everything from email to Skype to photobucket. It was key to documenting my trip and uploading the info in real time. As a traveler, I for one appreciate this immensely and hope we see it happen in all parts of the world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was huge for me .
I took a vacation to the UK this summer , for 14 days .
I had a netbook with me , which I used for everything from email to Skype to photobucket .
It was key to documenting my trip and uploading the info in real time .
As a traveler , I for one appreciate this immensely and hope we see it happen in all parts of the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was huge for me.
I took a vacation to the UK this summer, for 14 days.
I had a netbook with me, which I used for everything from email to Skype to photobucket.
It was key to documenting my trip and uploading the info in real time.
As a traveler, I for one appreciate this immensely and hope we see it happen in all parts of the world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491466</id>
	<title>better than Starbucks</title>
	<author>HockeyPuck</author>
	<datestamp>1261167660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First off the layout of a McDonalds is actually better than Starbucks.  It's pretty hard to find a seat in most starbucks and even if you do you're sitting at some tiny round table and a small chair.  Unless you happen to be one of the 4 people that can sit at the 'computer table' or in the big stuffed chairs.</p><p>McDonalds has booths and lots of them.  Which provide more than enough room for a few people with laptops to sit at and work.  Sure if you pick a McD's thats packed you're gonna be in for some noise, but the crowd that's there, unlike at Starbucks isn't looking to sit there for an hour and half and blog about the impact Software Piracy vs Somali Piracy as it pertains to the Nigerian bobsled team.</p><p>The new Mcdonalds coffee isn't that bad and the price is outstanding.  Sure I can't have the ego boosting espresso a hint of Madagascar cinnamon, but if I want something to drink while working, it's a pretty good deal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First off the layout of a McDonalds is actually better than Starbucks .
It 's pretty hard to find a seat in most starbucks and even if you do you 're sitting at some tiny round table and a small chair .
Unless you happen to be one of the 4 people that can sit at the 'computer table ' or in the big stuffed chairs.McDonalds has booths and lots of them .
Which provide more than enough room for a few people with laptops to sit at and work .
Sure if you pick a McD 's thats packed you 're gon na be in for some noise , but the crowd that 's there , unlike at Starbucks is n't looking to sit there for an hour and half and blog about the impact Software Piracy vs Somali Piracy as it pertains to the Nigerian bobsled team.The new Mcdonalds coffee is n't that bad and the price is outstanding .
Sure I ca n't have the ego boosting espresso a hint of Madagascar cinnamon , but if I want something to drink while working , it 's a pretty good deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First off the layout of a McDonalds is actually better than Starbucks.
It's pretty hard to find a seat in most starbucks and even if you do you're sitting at some tiny round table and a small chair.
Unless you happen to be one of the 4 people that can sit at the 'computer table' or in the big stuffed chairs.McDonalds has booths and lots of them.
Which provide more than enough room for a few people with laptops to sit at and work.
Sure if you pick a McD's thats packed you're gonna be in for some noise, but the crowd that's there, unlike at Starbucks isn't looking to sit there for an hour and half and blog about the impact Software Piracy vs Somali Piracy as it pertains to the Nigerian bobsled team.The new Mcdonalds coffee isn't that bad and the price is outstanding.
Sure I can't have the ego boosting espresso a hint of Madagascar cinnamon, but if I want something to drink while working, it's a pretty good deal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492312</id>
	<title>Free as in beer?</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1261127520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now how lucky are folks who live in apartments that but right up next to a McDonald's?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now how lucky are folks who live in apartments that but right up next to a McDonald 's ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now how lucky are folks who live in apartments that but right up next to a McDonald's?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490846</id>
	<title>It's the expensive places that still charge for it</title>
	<author>Grond</author>
	<datestamp>1261165260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've noticed that, in general, the more expensive a place is the more likely it is to charge for WiFi.  Hotels are especially bad about this.  Inexpensive chains usually offer free WiFi whereas expensive hotels generally charge.  Hiltons, in particular, often charge unbelievable rates: $15/night in some hotels.  Far from competition bringing the price down, some have actually increased their rates over the years; $10/night used to be fairly standard.  As best I can figure, they're targeting business travelers with expense accounts.  For example, many hotels charge extra for the ability to use a VPN, which makes no technical sense but is a great way to price discriminate.</p><p>I've also found that the terrible WiFi rates at many high-end hotels actually make sites like Priceline less useful.  Yeah, you might get a great rate on a 4-star hotel, but when you figure in the cost of WiFi and parking it often ends up being nearly a wash.  I think in the end it'll actually be the cell phone companies that kill overpriced WiFi.  If you can use your tethered cell phone, why pay for WiFi?  Sure a tethered data plan might be $60/month, but that's for 30 days compared to just 4 nights of WiFi at a Hilton.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've noticed that , in general , the more expensive a place is the more likely it is to charge for WiFi .
Hotels are especially bad about this .
Inexpensive chains usually offer free WiFi whereas expensive hotels generally charge .
Hiltons , in particular , often charge unbelievable rates : $ 15/night in some hotels .
Far from competition bringing the price down , some have actually increased their rates over the years ; $ 10/night used to be fairly standard .
As best I can figure , they 're targeting business travelers with expense accounts .
For example , many hotels charge extra for the ability to use a VPN , which makes no technical sense but is a great way to price discriminate.I 've also found that the terrible WiFi rates at many high-end hotels actually make sites like Priceline less useful .
Yeah , you might get a great rate on a 4-star hotel , but when you figure in the cost of WiFi and parking it often ends up being nearly a wash. I think in the end it 'll actually be the cell phone companies that kill overpriced WiFi .
If you can use your tethered cell phone , why pay for WiFi ?
Sure a tethered data plan might be $ 60/month , but that 's for 30 days compared to just 4 nights of WiFi at a Hilton .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've noticed that, in general, the more expensive a place is the more likely it is to charge for WiFi.
Hotels are especially bad about this.
Inexpensive chains usually offer free WiFi whereas expensive hotels generally charge.
Hiltons, in particular, often charge unbelievable rates: $15/night in some hotels.
Far from competition bringing the price down, some have actually increased their rates over the years; $10/night used to be fairly standard.
As best I can figure, they're targeting business travelers with expense accounts.
For example, many hotels charge extra for the ability to use a VPN, which makes no technical sense but is a great way to price discriminate.I've also found that the terrible WiFi rates at many high-end hotels actually make sites like Priceline less useful.
Yeah, you might get a great rate on a 4-star hotel, but when you figure in the cost of WiFi and parking it often ends up being nearly a wash.  I think in the end it'll actually be the cell phone companies that kill overpriced WiFi.
If you can use your tethered cell phone, why pay for WiFi?
Sure a tethered data plan might be $60/month, but that's for 30 days compared to just 4 nights of WiFi at a Hilton.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489680</id>
	<title>Re:understanding is critical here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261161480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I frequent Panera in multiple cities/states and have never had to pay any any location. It is truly free--once you click through a TOS page, you're in with no validation code or purchase required. And they have definitely received my business on many occasions because of that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I frequent Panera in multiple cities/states and have never had to pay any any location .
It is truly free--once you click through a TOS page , you 're in with no validation code or purchase required .
And they have definitely received my business on many occasions because of that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I frequent Panera in multiple cities/states and have never had to pay any any location.
It is truly free--once you click through a TOS page, you're in with no validation code or purchase required.
And they have definitely received my business on many occasions because of that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492230</id>
	<title>Re:Starbucks free?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's AT&amp;T WiFi, free for iPhone users.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's AT&amp;T WiFi , free for iPhone users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's AT&amp;T WiFi, free for iPhone users.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494386</id>
	<title>free is free?</title>
	<author>ncohafmuta</author>
	<datestamp>1261136820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"free is free"? man, that's profound. who was the genius that thought that one up?<br>probably the same guy that is implying that mcdonald's isn't greedy anymore. greasy, maybe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" free is free " ?
man , that 's profound .
who was the genius that thought that one up ? probably the same guy that is implying that mcdonald 's is n't greedy anymore .
greasy , maybe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"free is free"?
man, that's profound.
who was the genius that thought that one up?probably the same guy that is implying that mcdonald's isn't greedy anymore.
greasy, maybe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494076</id>
	<title>Re:It's the expensive places that still charge for</title>
	<author>Just Some Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1261135320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah, you might get a great rate on a 4-star hotel, but when you figure in the cost of WiFi and parking it often ends up being nearly a wash.</p></div><p>People <em>pay</em> for hotel WiFi? That's the whole point of MAC spoofing. Run your favorite sniffer until you see a MAC passing a lot of traffic, make sure it's not the WAP itself, then change your MAC to it. OK, so you and the person you're borrowing from will get each other's packets, but your network stacks will drop packets they aren't expecting.</p><p>Or so I've read.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , you might get a great rate on a 4-star hotel , but when you figure in the cost of WiFi and parking it often ends up being nearly a wash.People pay for hotel WiFi ?
That 's the whole point of MAC spoofing .
Run your favorite sniffer until you see a MAC passing a lot of traffic , make sure it 's not the WAP itself , then change your MAC to it .
OK , so you and the person you 're borrowing from will get each other 's packets , but your network stacks will drop packets they are n't expecting.Or so I 've read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, you might get a great rate on a 4-star hotel, but when you figure in the cost of WiFi and parking it often ends up being nearly a wash.People pay for hotel WiFi?
That's the whole point of MAC spoofing.
Run your favorite sniffer until you see a MAC passing a lot of traffic, make sure it's not the WAP itself, then change your MAC to it.
OK, so you and the person you're borrowing from will get each other's packets, but your network stacks will drop packets they aren't expecting.Or so I've read.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495186</id>
	<title>We have this in Australia</title>
	<author>dov\_0</author>
	<datestamp>1261142340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Been free for ages here in Australia and stacks of people use it. Especially loved by poor students everywhere...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Been free for ages here in Australia and stacks of people use it .
Especially loved by poor students everywhere.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Been free for ages here in Australia and stacks of people use it.
Especially loved by poor students everywhere...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496890</id>
	<title>Re:understanding is critical here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261163100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thankfully, my local Paneras block neither ssh nor VPN.  But xkcd is blocked.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thankfully , my local Paneras block neither ssh nor VPN .
But xkcd is blocked .
: -/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thankfully, my local Paneras block neither ssh nor VPN.
But xkcd is blocked.
:-/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495104</id>
	<title>Re:Expect bright lights</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261141560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All they would have to do is have a clerk go around to tables every 20 minutes or so and ask people if they needed anything else.  The geeks who want to surf and be left alone will get aggravated will leave.  The regular people will think it's great service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All they would have to do is have a clerk go around to tables every 20 minutes or so and ask people if they needed anything else .
The geeks who want to surf and be left alone will get aggravated will leave .
The regular people will think it 's great service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All they would have to do is have a clerk go around to tables every 20 minutes or so and ask people if they needed anything else.
The geeks who want to surf and be left alone will get aggravated will leave.
The regular people will think it's great service.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490534</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30497968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30498870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30497024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1638232_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491658
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491400
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495154
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496650
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489654
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495674
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490786
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490368
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491198
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489500
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489522
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491130
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489926
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493066
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491954
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491860
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30498870
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492820
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491180
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496070
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492906
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489964
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489454
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490432
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489996
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489674
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489892
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496326
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493374
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492416
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490080
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491122
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491658
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493542
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496282
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30497968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489648
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491804
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30497024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494390
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491118
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495134
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490064
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491880
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490748
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489794
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493330
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491598
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30491230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30489764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30493748
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30492520
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30495104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30496350
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1638232.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30490038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1638232.30494912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
