<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_18_1626237</id>
	<title>iPhone Has 46\% of Japanese Smartphone Market</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1261154460000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.foobarsoft.com/" rel="nofollow">MBCook</a> writes <i>"Despite <a href="//apple.slashdot.org/story/09/02/27/144256/Why-Japan-Hates-the-iPhone">claims</a> earlier in the year that the iPhone was hated by Japanese consumers (later <a href="//apple.slashdot.org/story/09/03/01/1358233/Japanese-Hate-For-the-iPhone-All-a-Big-Mistake">disproved</a>), the <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/12/18/apples\_iphone\_commands\_46\_of\_japanese\_smartphone\_market.html">iPhone has been doing well</a> in the land of the rising sun and the evidence is in. Apple has taken 46\% of the Japanese smartphone market, cutting in half the once 27\% market share of the previous lead, <a href="http://www.sharp.co.jp/ws/011sh/">Advance Sharp W-Zero3</a> (Japanese site). The article includes a large chart of the market share of Japanese smartphones over the last 3 years."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>MBCook writes " Despite claims earlier in the year that the iPhone was hated by Japanese consumers ( later disproved ) , the iPhone has been doing well in the land of the rising sun and the evidence is in .
Apple has taken 46 \ % of the Japanese smartphone market , cutting in half the once 27 \ % market share of the previous lead , Advance Sharp W-Zero3 ( Japanese site ) .
The article includes a large chart of the market share of Japanese smartphones over the last 3 years .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MBCook writes "Despite claims earlier in the year that the iPhone was hated by Japanese consumers (later disproved), the iPhone has been doing well in the land of the rising sun and the evidence is in.
Apple has taken 46\% of the Japanese smartphone market, cutting in half the once 27\% market share of the previous lead, Advance Sharp W-Zero3 (Japanese site).
The article includes a large chart of the market share of Japanese smartphones over the last 3 years.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490384</id>
	<title>Re:So why is XBox unpopular?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261163640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's mostly because Xbox hardware is a piece of crap that dies easily. And the Japanese don't take that kind of shit lightly, especially when a company tries to hide he magnitude of the problem.</p></div><p>Because that totally signaled the death of the PS2 after its massive rate of failure early on with defective DVD drives...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's mostly because Xbox hardware is a piece of crap that dies easily .
And the Japanese do n't take that kind of shit lightly , especially when a company tries to hide he magnitude of the problem.Because that totally signaled the death of the PS2 after its massive rate of failure early on with defective DVD drives.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's mostly because Xbox hardware is a piece of crap that dies easily.
And the Japanese don't take that kind of shit lightly, especially when a company tries to hide he magnitude of the problem.Because that totally signaled the death of the PS2 after its massive rate of failure early on with defective DVD drives...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491178</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>GetTragic</author>
	<datestamp>1261166460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm actually confused, I thought from reading around on slashdot </p></div><p>I think I've identified your problem!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm actually confused , I thought from reading around on slashdot I think I 've identified your problem !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm actually confused, I thought from reading around on slashdot I think I've identified your problem!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489816</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>StreetStealth</author>
	<datestamp>1261161840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I thought from reading around on slashdot that Japanese phones were 10+ years ahead of American ones? How did we catch up so quickly?</p></div></blockquote><p>We didn't. The <i>average</i> Japanese cell phone is still vastly higher-tech than the average US cell phone.</p><p>In terms of feature set, the iPhone isn't particularly remarkable compared to run-of-the-mill Japanese handsets. The reason it's become so popular is the same reason it's done so everywhere else: the quality of the UI and the gestalt user experience absolutely blow everything else away.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought from reading around on slashdot that Japanese phones were 10 + years ahead of American ones ?
How did we catch up so quickly ? We did n't .
The average Japanese cell phone is still vastly higher-tech than the average US cell phone.In terms of feature set , the iPhone is n't particularly remarkable compared to run-of-the-mill Japanese handsets .
The reason it 's become so popular is the same reason it 's done so everywhere else : the quality of the UI and the gestalt user experience absolutely blow everything else away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought from reading around on slashdot that Japanese phones were 10+ years ahead of American ones?
How did we catch up so quickly?We didn't.
The average Japanese cell phone is still vastly higher-tech than the average US cell phone.In terms of feature set, the iPhone isn't particularly remarkable compared to run-of-the-mill Japanese handsets.
The reason it's become so popular is the same reason it's done so everywhere else: the quality of the UI and the gestalt user experience absolutely blow everything else away.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490696</id>
	<title>Better sales chart</title>
	<author>fiannaFailMan</author>
	<datestamp>1261164660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I took a minute to knock up a more informative sales chart, a <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/21669850@N05/4195735080/" title="flickr.com">stacked graph by year</a> [flickr.com].</p><p>I was in a rush so I skipped out the smaller sellers and a label for the Y axis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I took a minute to knock up a more informative sales chart , a stacked graph by year [ flickr.com ] .I was in a rush so I skipped out the smaller sellers and a label for the Y axis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I took a minute to knock up a more informative sales chart, a stacked graph by year [flickr.com].I was in a rush so I skipped out the smaller sellers and a label for the Y axis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30498290</id>
	<title>Mod Parent Up</title>
	<author>Sapphon</author>
	<datestamp>1261235700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good points regarding the statistics and selective reporting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good points regarding the statistics and selective reporting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good points regarding the statistics and selective reporting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489450</id>
	<title>Re:Remember when smartphone meant something?</title>
	<author>0xdeadbeef</author>
	<datestamp>1261160700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, I've been googling those names, and every one I don't recognize is either running Windows Mobile (and most of those manufactured by HTC) or a rebranded Nokia device. Where are those amazing homegrown wonders that make the Japanese market so hard to crack?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I 've been googling those names , and every one I do n't recognize is either running Windows Mobile ( and most of those manufactured by HTC ) or a rebranded Nokia device .
Where are those amazing homegrown wonders that make the Japanese market so hard to crack ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I've been googling those names, and every one I don't recognize is either running Windows Mobile (and most of those manufactured by HTC) or a rebranded Nokia device.
Where are those amazing homegrown wonders that make the Japanese market so hard to crack?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492742</id>
	<title>Duh!</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1261129080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Who invented the Time Machine?</p></div><p>Well, <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/what-is-macosx/time-machine.html" title="apple.com">Apple</a> [apple.com] did, of course!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who invented the Time Machine ? Well , Apple [ apple.com ] did , of course !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who invented the Time Machine?Well, Apple [apple.com] did, of course!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493178</id>
	<title>But the iPhone isn't a smartphone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261130880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The iPhone is closer to your typical BREW phone than it is to what I'd call a smart phone. It has an approval process for its app store (just like BREW - winmo, Android, etc.. have no such restrictions). Can't install apps EXCEPT through the app store (same as BREW - again, other smartphones have no such restrictions). Can only run a single app at a time (ditto). Can't customize the main screen (notice a trend yet?). The iPhone only gets called a smartphone because it had a good web browser - but installing Opera on a BREW phone doesn't suddenly make it a smartphone, just like the iPhone isn't a smartphone.</p><p>And yes I know you can jailbreak the iPhone, but that would just be hacking a "dumb" phone into a smartphone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The iPhone is closer to your typical BREW phone than it is to what I 'd call a smart phone .
It has an approval process for its app store ( just like BREW - winmo , Android , etc.. have no such restrictions ) .
Ca n't install apps EXCEPT through the app store ( same as BREW - again , other smartphones have no such restrictions ) .
Can only run a single app at a time ( ditto ) .
Ca n't customize the main screen ( notice a trend yet ? ) .
The iPhone only gets called a smartphone because it had a good web browser - but installing Opera on a BREW phone does n't suddenly make it a smartphone , just like the iPhone is n't a smartphone.And yes I know you can jailbreak the iPhone , but that would just be hacking a " dumb " phone into a smartphone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iPhone is closer to your typical BREW phone than it is to what I'd call a smart phone.
It has an approval process for its app store (just like BREW - winmo, Android, etc.. have no such restrictions).
Can't install apps EXCEPT through the app store (same as BREW - again, other smartphones have no such restrictions).
Can only run a single app at a time (ditto).
Can't customize the main screen (notice a trend yet?).
The iPhone only gets called a smartphone because it had a good web browser - but installing Opera on a BREW phone doesn't suddenly make it a smartphone, just like the iPhone isn't a smartphone.And yes I know you can jailbreak the iPhone, but that would just be hacking a "dumb" phone into a smartphone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30503608</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the beef, er iPhones...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261320720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The dumb thing about these fanboyish articles, is that the numbers really dont mean jack. Every phone in Japan can send/receive push email. If by that merit they are smartphones, then its certainly not 46\%. I'd say the average Japanese phone is smarter than an iPhone non-3G to be sure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The dumb thing about these fanboyish articles , is that the numbers really dont mean jack .
Every phone in Japan can send/receive push email .
If by that merit they are smartphones , then its certainly not 46 \ % .
I 'd say the average Japanese phone is smarter than an iPhone non-3G to be sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The dumb thing about these fanboyish articles, is that the numbers really dont mean jack.
Every phone in Japan can send/receive push email.
If by that merit they are smartphones, then its certainly not 46\%.
I'd say the average Japanese phone is smarter than an iPhone non-3G to be sure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488972</id>
	<title>Cue trolls</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261158960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can't wait to see how the huge anti-iPhone mob around here spins this.  I'm guessing they will take the "iPhone is for conformist fags" approach.<br>
<br>
Place your bets!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't wait to see how the huge anti-iPhone mob around here spins this .
I 'm guessing they will take the " iPhone is for conformist fags " approach .
Place your bets !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't wait to see how the huge anti-iPhone mob around here spins this.
I'm guessing they will take the "iPhone is for conformist fags" approach.
Place your bets!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489170</id>
	<title>Re:Cue trolls</title>
	<author>Povno</author>
	<datestamp>1261159680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I myself can't wait to see how the <b>iPhone</b> mob around here spins this. I'm guessing they will take the "<b>anti-iPhone sentiment</b> is for conformist fags" approach.<br> <br>

What?!  I'm just sayin'...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I myself ca n't wait to see how the iPhone mob around here spins this .
I 'm guessing they will take the " anti-iPhone sentiment is for conformist fags " approach .
What ? ! I 'm just sayin'.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I myself can't wait to see how the iPhone mob around here spins this.
I'm guessing they will take the "anti-iPhone sentiment is for conformist fags" approach.
What?!  I'm just sayin'...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30541432</id>
	<title>Re:Better Article at Engadget Mobile</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259770500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I spent a week in Tokyo back in November.  When I was there, I saw 2 iPhones in the wild. [...]</p></div><p>Sure.  A week in November.  That provides a good sample.</p><p>I commute to work in Tokyo every week day.  Have done so for quite a long time.  Non iPhones are certainly plentiful.<br>But the number of iPhones held by every day normal Japanese citizens is on a noticeable increase.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I spent a week in Tokyo back in November .
When I was there , I saw 2 iPhones in the wild .
[ ... ] Sure. A week in November .
That provides a good sample.I commute to work in Tokyo every week day .
Have done so for quite a long time .
Non iPhones are certainly plentiful.But the number of iPhones held by every day normal Japanese citizens is on a noticeable increase .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I spent a week in Tokyo back in November.
When I was there, I saw 2 iPhones in the wild.
[...]Sure.  A week in November.
That provides a good sample.I commute to work in Tokyo every week day.
Have done so for quite a long time.
Non iPhones are certainly plentiful.But the number of iPhones held by every day normal Japanese citizens is on a noticeable increase.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489282</id>
	<title>Nice try, but no.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261160100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article should read: <b>The few people that are buying smart phones are buying iPhones.</b></p><p>Apple has a huge share of the TINY smart phone market. They key to this article is omitting the Smart phone market share.</p><p>Average Japanese phones are smart enough that smart phones are very unpopular in Japan. People who need to do more than surf and email carry laptops, and more recently "netbooks."</p><p>Also most people prefer the keypad over a keyboard for entering Japanese into their phones. This is just how Japanese is. So all those keypad phones are also unpopular.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article should read : The few people that are buying smart phones are buying iPhones.Apple has a huge share of the TINY smart phone market .
They key to this article is omitting the Smart phone market share.Average Japanese phones are smart enough that smart phones are very unpopular in Japan .
People who need to do more than surf and email carry laptops , and more recently " netbooks .
" Also most people prefer the keypad over a keyboard for entering Japanese into their phones .
This is just how Japanese is .
So all those keypad phones are also unpopular .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article should read: The few people that are buying smart phones are buying iPhones.Apple has a huge share of the TINY smart phone market.
They key to this article is omitting the Smart phone market share.Average Japanese phones are smart enough that smart phones are very unpopular in Japan.
People who need to do more than surf and email carry laptops, and more recently "netbooks.
"Also most people prefer the keypad over a keyboard for entering Japanese into their phones.
This is just how Japanese is.
So all those keypad phones are also unpopular.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490514</id>
	<title>Japanese buy smart phones?</title>
	<author>Ogive17</author>
	<datestamp>1261164000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I spent 2 weeks in Japan (most of the time in Tokyo, Yokohama and Kyoto) and not once did I see a smart phone.  Most people there use advanced flip phones.  So smart phones have what, 5\% of market share total and iPhone is 2.5\% total?  And that seems like a very generous guess based on my experience.<br>
<br>
And I spent lots of time on the subway and various local trains and buses.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I spent 2 weeks in Japan ( most of the time in Tokyo , Yokohama and Kyoto ) and not once did I see a smart phone .
Most people there use advanced flip phones .
So smart phones have what , 5 \ % of market share total and iPhone is 2.5 \ % total ?
And that seems like a very generous guess based on my experience .
And I spent lots of time on the subway and various local trains and buses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I spent 2 weeks in Japan (most of the time in Tokyo, Yokohama and Kyoto) and not once did I see a smart phone.
Most people there use advanced flip phones.
So smart phones have what, 5\% of market share total and iPhone is 2.5\% total?
And that seems like a very generous guess based on my experience.
And I spent lots of time on the subway and various local trains and buses.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490522</id>
	<title>I've seen them a lot lately</title>
	<author>hasdikarlsam</author>
	<datestamp>1261164060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..in anime, manga and other media.</p><p>If a phone shows up, chances are it's an iPhone, and often labelled as such. Given that anime is otherwise often home to such labels as Carbucks and McGonads (it's in english, therefore it's cool, never mind what it <i>means</i>), them being labelled correctly pretty much means Apple is paying for it.</p><p>So. Advertisement, and lots of it. Anyone closer to the country able to verify this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..in anime , manga and other media.If a phone shows up , chances are it 's an iPhone , and often labelled as such .
Given that anime is otherwise often home to such labels as Carbucks and McGonads ( it 's in english , therefore it 's cool , never mind what it means ) , them being labelled correctly pretty much means Apple is paying for it.So .
Advertisement , and lots of it .
Anyone closer to the country able to verify this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..in anime, manga and other media.If a phone shows up, chances are it's an iPhone, and often labelled as such.
Given that anime is otherwise often home to such labels as Carbucks and McGonads (it's in english, therefore it's cool, never mind what it means), them being labelled correctly pretty much means Apple is paying for it.So.
Advertisement, and lots of it.
Anyone closer to the country able to verify this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497726</id>
	<title>Re:Better Article at Engadget Mobile</title>
	<author>AmiMoJo</author>
	<datestamp>1261225080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know a Japanese person who has one. She got it because she works at a hotel that caters to foreigners and so she handles emails and web sites in English. Most Japanese sites provide a cut down mobile version so there is little need for a full  browser with zoom etc, but most western sites don't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know a Japanese person who has one .
She got it because she works at a hotel that caters to foreigners and so she handles emails and web sites in English .
Most Japanese sites provide a cut down mobile version so there is little need for a full browser with zoom etc , but most western sites do n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know a Japanese person who has one.
She got it because she works at a hotel that caters to foreigners and so she handles emails and web sites in English.
Most Japanese sites provide a cut down mobile version so there is little need for a full  browser with zoom etc, but most western sites don't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30494880</id>
	<title>Re:Bogus survey?</title>
	<author>bushing</author>
	<datestamp>1261139820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As with the AdMob survey numbers based on web browsing hits this survey is suspicious.</p><p>Looking through my web server logs the only smartphone browser hits I get are from iPhone clients...</p><blockquote><div><p>"Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/1A543a Safari/419.3"</p></div></blockquote><p>Amazon runs their EC2 cloud computing cluster off iPhones? Something really fishy is going on here.</p></div><p>Yeah, 1A543a is a really really old version of the software (over 2 years old -- it's what the first iPhone launched with).  If that's representative of what most of the transactions look like, they're probably bogus.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As with the AdMob survey numbers based on web browsing hits this survey is suspicious.Looking through my web server logs the only smartphone browser hits I get are from iPhone clients... " Mozilla/5.0 ( iPhone ; U ; CPU like Mac OS X ; en ) AppleWebKit/420 + ( KHTML , like Gecko ) Version/3.0 Mobile/1A543a Safari/419.3 " Amazon runs their EC2 cloud computing cluster off iPhones ?
Something really fishy is going on here.Yeah , 1A543a is a really really old version of the software ( over 2 years old -- it 's what the first iPhone launched with ) .
If that 's representative of what most of the transactions look like , they 're probably bogus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As with the AdMob survey numbers based on web browsing hits this survey is suspicious.Looking through my web server logs the only smartphone browser hits I get are from iPhone clients..."Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/1A543a Safari/419.3"Amazon runs their EC2 cloud computing cluster off iPhones?
Something really fishy is going on here.Yeah, 1A543a is a really really old version of the software (over 2 years old -- it's what the first iPhone launched with).
If that's representative of what most of the transactions look like, they're probably bogus.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30494680</id>
	<title>Re:Nice try, but no.</title>
	<author>CharlyFoxtrot</author>
	<datestamp>1261138500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's better to be a market leader in a small growth industry than top dog in a dying market. Like when typing machine manufacturer IBM went into that silly computer business or when BASIC compiler writers MS cornered the x86 OS market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's better to be a market leader in a small growth industry than top dog in a dying market .
Like when typing machine manufacturer IBM went into that silly computer business or when BASIC compiler writers MS cornered the x86 OS market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's better to be a market leader in a small growth industry than top dog in a dying market.
Like when typing machine manufacturer IBM went into that silly computer business or when BASIC compiler writers MS cornered the x86 OS market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488908</id>
	<title>Re:So why is XBox unpopular?</title>
	<author>aristotle-dude</author>
	<datestamp>1261158720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wait they like iPhone? How can this be? But I thought XBox is unpopular in Japanese because they hate foreign products. I guess all this time it was because XBox sucks.</p></div><p>The Japanese will buy foreign products but they are not willing to put up with half-assed foreign crap like the XBox 360 which has a failure rate in the double digits. They only buy crap from overseas (windows) when there is no other viable choice.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait they like iPhone ?
How can this be ?
But I thought XBox is unpopular in Japanese because they hate foreign products .
I guess all this time it was because XBox sucks.The Japanese will buy foreign products but they are not willing to put up with half-assed foreign crap like the XBox 360 which has a failure rate in the double digits .
They only buy crap from overseas ( windows ) when there is no other viable choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait they like iPhone?
How can this be?
But I thought XBox is unpopular in Japanese because they hate foreign products.
I guess all this time it was because XBox sucks.The Japanese will buy foreign products but they are not willing to put up with half-assed foreign crap like the XBox 360 which has a failure rate in the double digits.
They only buy crap from overseas (windows) when there is no other viable choice.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30494900</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>rsborg</author>
	<datestamp>1261139940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The iPhone was in the interesting position of being (arguably) the first "smartphone" well executed enough(and running on powerful enough hardware) to outcompete the far less flexible, but far more mature, "featurephone" segment for a large number of people.</p></div></blockquote><p>I'd say the Palm/Handspring Treo 650 was the first such really usable smartphone... but as you mention, it probably failed due to poor hardware, inflexible OS, and poor execution on the part of Palm.</p><p>I did love my Verizon Treo 650 until I got my iPhone 2G.  Even without mobile data, the Treo was really good for managing my contacts/calendars/email and playing games.  It was really a data-centric device.</p><p>I'd argue that the new paradigm for smartphone as the mobile internet device (MID) is probably what the iPhone was aimed at, and hit with amazing accuracy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The iPhone was in the interesting position of being ( arguably ) the first " smartphone " well executed enough ( and running on powerful enough hardware ) to outcompete the far less flexible , but far more mature , " featurephone " segment for a large number of people.I 'd say the Palm/Handspring Treo 650 was the first such really usable smartphone... but as you mention , it probably failed due to poor hardware , inflexible OS , and poor execution on the part of Palm.I did love my Verizon Treo 650 until I got my iPhone 2G .
Even without mobile data , the Treo was really good for managing my contacts/calendars/email and playing games .
It was really a data-centric device.I 'd argue that the new paradigm for smartphone as the mobile internet device ( MID ) is probably what the iPhone was aimed at , and hit with amazing accuracy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iPhone was in the interesting position of being (arguably) the first "smartphone" well executed enough(and running on powerful enough hardware) to outcompete the far less flexible, but far more mature, "featurephone" segment for a large number of people.I'd say the Palm/Handspring Treo 650 was the first such really usable smartphone... but as you mention, it probably failed due to poor hardware, inflexible OS, and poor execution on the part of Palm.I did love my Verizon Treo 650 until I got my iPhone 2G.
Even without mobile data, the Treo was really good for managing my contacts/calendars/email and playing games.
It was really a data-centric device.I'd argue that the new paradigm for smartphone as the mobile internet device (MID) is probably what the iPhone was aimed at, and hit with amazing accuracy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497496</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261219680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm in Japan and see 3 - 4 TV commercials for the iPhone a day? And Apple doesn't tend to do print ads anyway...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm in Japan and see 3 - 4 TV commercials for the iPhone a day ?
And Apple does n't tend to do print ads anyway.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm in Japan and see 3 - 4 TV commercials for the iPhone a day?
And Apple doesn't tend to do print ads anyway...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489436</id>
	<title>The smartphone market in Japan is tiny</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261160700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hardly anyone in Japan actually uses a "smartphone". The regular flip phones are so full featured that there is not much need to. You can even download full TV series to your basic phone to watch while you ride the train. Between that, and email, and a few basic online apps, most consumers seem happy with their "bog standard" phones. The fact that a WinMo phone is in second place should be evidence enough that the smartphone market there is pretty much non-existant. Not once would you ever see someone on a WinMo phone.</p><p>Furthermore, phone fashion is a huge thing. While the iPhone is pretty nice by our standards, it's got nothing on some of the glitzy and sleek phones available there. Fashion also changes quickly, while the appearance of the iPhone has remained largely the same.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hardly anyone in Japan actually uses a " smartphone " .
The regular flip phones are so full featured that there is not much need to .
You can even download full TV series to your basic phone to watch while you ride the train .
Between that , and email , and a few basic online apps , most consumers seem happy with their " bog standard " phones .
The fact that a WinMo phone is in second place should be evidence enough that the smartphone market there is pretty much non-existant .
Not once would you ever see someone on a WinMo phone.Furthermore , phone fashion is a huge thing .
While the iPhone is pretty nice by our standards , it 's got nothing on some of the glitzy and sleek phones available there .
Fashion also changes quickly , while the appearance of the iPhone has remained largely the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hardly anyone in Japan actually uses a "smartphone".
The regular flip phones are so full featured that there is not much need to.
You can even download full TV series to your basic phone to watch while you ride the train.
Between that, and email, and a few basic online apps, most consumers seem happy with their "bog standard" phones.
The fact that a WinMo phone is in second place should be evidence enough that the smartphone market there is pretty much non-existant.
Not once would you ever see someone on a WinMo phone.Furthermore, phone fashion is a huge thing.
While the iPhone is pretty nice by our standards, it's got nothing on some of the glitzy and sleek phones available there.
Fashion also changes quickly, while the appearance of the iPhone has remained largely the same.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497062</id>
	<title>Re:Another out of context hype article</title>
	<author>aristotle-dude</author>
	<datestamp>1261165680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Browse the web just fine? Is that a real web browser or I-mode because the latter is really just a beefed up WAP standard that requires pages be written specifically for I-mode phones and are usually only available through a walled garden I-mode portal run by the carrier.
<p>
Those "icons" are called emoji and the iPhone also has that feature enabled if you activate on a Japanese carrier or download one of many free emoji apps to trick the OS into allowing you to enable it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Browse the web just fine ?
Is that a real web browser or I-mode because the latter is really just a beefed up WAP standard that requires pages be written specifically for I-mode phones and are usually only available through a walled garden I-mode portal run by the carrier .
Those " icons " are called emoji and the iPhone also has that feature enabled if you activate on a Japanese carrier or download one of many free emoji apps to trick the OS into allowing you to enable it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Browse the web just fine?
Is that a real web browser or I-mode because the latter is really just a beefed up WAP standard that requires pages be written specifically for I-mode phones and are usually only available through a walled garden I-mode portal run by the carrier.
Those "icons" are called emoji and the iPhone also has that feature enabled if you activate on a Japanese carrier or download one of many free emoji apps to trick the OS into allowing you to enable it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30496822</id>
	<title>Re:Better Article at Engadget Mobile</title>
	<author>Nazlfrag</author>
	<datestamp>1261162140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better headline:</p><p><b>iPhone nabs 46\% of respondents in a survey of 3000 Japanese smartphone owners. Sales figures not included.</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better headline : iPhone nabs 46 \ % of respondents in a survey of 3000 Japanese smartphone owners .
Sales figures not included .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better headline:iPhone nabs 46\% of respondents in a survey of 3000 Japanese smartphone owners.
Sales figures not included.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490126</id>
	<title>Monopoly</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1261162800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has there been any WHARGARBLE over Apple having a monopoly in the Japanese SmartPhone market?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has there been any WHARGARBLE over Apple having a monopoly in the Japanese SmartPhone market ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has there been any WHARGARBLE over Apple having a monopoly in the Japanese SmartPhone market?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491752</id>
	<title>Re:Remember when smartphone meant something?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least I can put out my own apps on the Windows Mobile platform without paying a premium to Microsoft to do it.<br> <br>If you guys are going to scream about a Microsoft Tax at the drop of a hat then this is just as valid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least I can put out my own apps on the Windows Mobile platform without paying a premium to Microsoft to do it .
If you guys are going to scream about a Microsoft Tax at the drop of a hat then this is just as valid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least I can put out my own apps on the Windows Mobile platform without paying a premium to Microsoft to do it.
If you guys are going to scream about a Microsoft Tax at the drop of a hat then this is just as valid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489404</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the beef, er iPhones...</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1261160580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no agreed upon definition of a smartphone for starters; practically all SE phones should qualify if iPhone does...</p><p>But there's another thing. Which probably can't be applied here, with 46\%, but certainly is present in not so clear scenarios.</p><p>Namely - Apple has only one product. Yes, there's "non-3G", 3G and 3GS, but <i>they are practically always presented as one device</i>, "iPhone" (as in this case). Also on the lists of popularity of handsets (as in this case). But..."iPhone" belongs more in a chart with popularity of whole brands.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no agreed upon definition of a smartphone for starters ; practically all SE phones should qualify if iPhone does...But there 's another thing .
Which probably ca n't be applied here , with 46 \ % , but certainly is present in not so clear scenarios.Namely - Apple has only one product .
Yes , there 's " non-3G " , 3G and 3GS , but they are practically always presented as one device , " iPhone " ( as in this case ) .
Also on the lists of popularity of handsets ( as in this case ) .
But... " iPhone " belongs more in a chart with popularity of whole brands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no agreed upon definition of a smartphone for starters; practically all SE phones should qualify if iPhone does...But there's another thing.
Which probably can't be applied here, with 46\%, but certainly is present in not so clear scenarios.Namely - Apple has only one product.
Yes, there's "non-3G", 3G and 3GS, but they are practically always presented as one device, "iPhone" (as in this case).
Also on the lists of popularity of handsets (as in this case).
But..."iPhone" belongs more in a chart with popularity of whole brands.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489876</id>
	<title>The summary lies! It's 24.6\% Not 46\%!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh what a convenient lack of the number 2 and movement of the decimal point...</p><p>Here&rsquo;s the translated report:<br><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&amp;prev=\_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;layout=1&amp;eotf=1&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.impressrd.jp\%2Fnews\%2F091210\%2Fsmartphone2010&amp;sl=ja&amp;tl=en" title="google.com">http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&amp;prev=\_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;layout=1&amp;eotf=1&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.impressrd.jp\%2Fnews\%2F091210\%2Fsmartphone2010&amp;sl=ja&amp;tl=en</a> [google.com]</p><p>Try to find anything else than the 24.6\% in there!</p><p>LOL, and I thought I did go a bit too far in <a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1483478&amp;cid=30489710" title="slashdot.org">my previous comment</a> [slashdot.org], where I stated that the Apple reality distortion bubble would make people want it so much, that they would make things up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh what a convenient lack of the number 2 and movement of the decimal point...Here    s the translated report : http : //translate.google.com/translate ? js = y&amp;prev = \ _t&amp;hl = en&amp;ie = UTF-8&amp;layout = 1&amp;eotf = 1&amp;u = http \ % 3A \ % 2F \ % 2Fwww.impressrd.jp \ % 2Fnews \ % 2F091210 \ % 2Fsmartphone2010&amp;sl = ja&amp;tl = en [ google.com ] Try to find anything else than the 24.6 \ % in there ! LOL , and I thought I did go a bit too far in my previous comment [ slashdot.org ] , where I stated that the Apple reality distortion bubble would make people want it so much , that they would make things up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh what a convenient lack of the number 2 and movement of the decimal point...Here’s the translated report:http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&amp;prev=\_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;layout=1&amp;eotf=1&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.impressrd.jp\%2Fnews\%2F091210\%2Fsmartphone2010&amp;sl=ja&amp;tl=en [google.com]Try to find anything else than the 24.6\% in there!LOL, and I thought I did go a bit too far in my previous comment [slashdot.org], where I stated that the Apple reality distortion bubble would make people want it so much, that they would make things up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488784</id>
	<title>Japanese iPhone Commercial</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261158240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The localized Apple commercials for the iPhone feature archival footage of Mothra and Gamera fighting and crushing Japanese cities. <br> <br>"Need to call Godzilla for help, there's an APP for that."<br> <br>Seth</htmltext>
<tokenext>The localized Apple commercials for the iPhone feature archival footage of Mothra and Gamera fighting and crushing Japanese cities .
" Need to call Godzilla for help , there 's an APP for that .
" Seth</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The localized Apple commercials for the iPhone feature archival footage of Mothra and Gamera fighting and crushing Japanese cities.
"Need to call Godzilla for help, there's an APP for that.
" Seth</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30496624</id>
	<title>Re:also more turkey than iPhone purchases at Xmas</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1261159080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and all the while ignoring that Symbian has more than 50\% marketshare.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and all the while ignoring that Symbian has more than 50 \ % marketshare .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and all the while ignoring that Symbian has more than 50\% marketshare.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489360</id>
	<title>Re:Remember when smartphone meant something?</title>
	<author>chitokutai</author>
	<datestamp>1261160460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, you're right, but in the wrong sort of way.  The term smartphone that we've all associated with PDA-style functionality has yet to really rear its head here in Japan.  Docomo has just barely started advertising the "Google Phone", and AU/KDDI won't even get a smartphone model until next year.  Seriously, if you look at this list (I know, RTFA), Wilcom is in the number 2 position, and that company is barely a spec of dust in the cell phone market over here.</p><p>I wouldn't be surprised if the iPhone continued at the top of the smartphone market because of its extensive advertising, but even if the iPhone is be a well-made phone, simply put, it has no competition in Japan for its particular segment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , you 're right , but in the wrong sort of way .
The term smartphone that we 've all associated with PDA-style functionality has yet to really rear its head here in Japan .
Docomo has just barely started advertising the " Google Phone " , and AU/KDDI wo n't even get a smartphone model until next year .
Seriously , if you look at this list ( I know , RTFA ) , Wilcom is in the number 2 position , and that company is barely a spec of dust in the cell phone market over here.I would n't be surprised if the iPhone continued at the top of the smartphone market because of its extensive advertising , but even if the iPhone is be a well-made phone , simply put , it has no competition in Japan for its particular segment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, you're right, but in the wrong sort of way.
The term smartphone that we've all associated with PDA-style functionality has yet to really rear its head here in Japan.
Docomo has just barely started advertising the "Google Phone", and AU/KDDI won't even get a smartphone model until next year.
Seriously, if you look at this list (I know, RTFA), Wilcom is in the number 2 position, and that company is barely a spec of dust in the cell phone market over here.I wouldn't be surprised if the iPhone continued at the top of the smartphone market because of its extensive advertising, but even if the iPhone is be a well-made phone, simply put, it has no competition in Japan for its particular segment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490310</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>Twizzle4Shizzle</author>
	<datestamp>1261163400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was in Japan in September as well this year. They did have the iPhone as you pointed out, but I think most importantly is that every place that was selling was giving it away for free (0 Yen). That price was there for the full time I was there.  I don't know if the carriers were fully subsiding the phone or if Apple was cutting prices because they were having a difficult time selling it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was in Japan in September as well this year .
They did have the iPhone as you pointed out , but I think most importantly is that every place that was selling was giving it away for free ( 0 Yen ) .
That price was there for the full time I was there .
I do n't know if the carriers were fully subsiding the phone or if Apple was cutting prices because they were having a difficult time selling it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was in Japan in September as well this year.
They did have the iPhone as you pointed out, but I think most importantly is that every place that was selling was giving it away for free (0 Yen).
That price was there for the full time I was there.
I don't know if the carriers were fully subsiding the phone or if Apple was cutting prices because they were having a difficult time selling it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497130</id>
	<title>Re:Another out of context hype article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261253640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I could go on for ages about the etc,etc,etc features but I just wanted to mention of the cooler ones that was on the first phone I bought in Japan (5 years ago).</p><p>It had a secret address book that was separate from the normal address book that let you keep the prying eyes of your significant other away from the contact details of your less significant secret others. Unless the secret address book was activated,any call history or text messages from numbers in the secret address book were hidden too. It is very common for suspicious wives to check their husbands phones and vice versa so there was obviously a demand for this feature. I miss that non-smart phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could go on for ages about the etc,etc,etc features but I just wanted to mention of the cooler ones that was on the first phone I bought in Japan ( 5 years ago ) .It had a secret address book that was separate from the normal address book that let you keep the prying eyes of your significant other away from the contact details of your less significant secret others .
Unless the secret address book was activated,any call history or text messages from numbers in the secret address book were hidden too .
It is very common for suspicious wives to check their husbands phones and vice versa so there was obviously a demand for this feature .
I miss that non-smart phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could go on for ages about the etc,etc,etc features but I just wanted to mention of the cooler ones that was on the first phone I bought in Japan (5 years ago).It had a secret address book that was separate from the normal address book that let you keep the prying eyes of your significant other away from the contact details of your less significant secret others.
Unless the secret address book was activated,any call history or text messages from numbers in the secret address book were hidden too.
It is very common for suspicious wives to check their husbands phones and vice versa so there was obviously a demand for this feature.
I miss that non-smart phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488942</id>
	<title>Re:So why is XBox unpopular?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261158840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's probably because Sony, being Based in Tokyo, knows a heck of a lot more about Japanese Culture then Microsoft, an American Company who caters to Americans. Given that every game a Japanese Teenager would want to play (Meaning Anime style Haircuits and/or cool swords and guns) came out exclusively for the PS3.</p><p>The point is, a game console is dependant on games. Games are dependant on developers. Developers are influenced by culture.</p><p>Phones, however, are not so much. If it can talk, text, and email, its good to go. The iPhone is flashy, and possibly "better" than the other smartphones they've got selling over there.</p><p>Foreign has nothing to do with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably because Sony , being Based in Tokyo , knows a heck of a lot more about Japanese Culture then Microsoft , an American Company who caters to Americans .
Given that every game a Japanese Teenager would want to play ( Meaning Anime style Haircuits and/or cool swords and guns ) came out exclusively for the PS3.The point is , a game console is dependant on games .
Games are dependant on developers .
Developers are influenced by culture.Phones , however , are not so much .
If it can talk , text , and email , its good to go .
The iPhone is flashy , and possibly " better " than the other smartphones they 've got selling over there.Foreign has nothing to do with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably because Sony, being Based in Tokyo, knows a heck of a lot more about Japanese Culture then Microsoft, an American Company who caters to Americans.
Given that every game a Japanese Teenager would want to play (Meaning Anime style Haircuits and/or cool swords and guns) came out exclusively for the PS3.The point is, a game console is dependant on games.
Games are dependant on developers.
Developers are influenced by culture.Phones, however, are not so much.
If it can talk, text, and email, its good to go.
The iPhone is flashy, and possibly "better" than the other smartphones they've got selling over there.Foreign has nothing to do with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493274</id>
	<title>Re:Broad definition</title>
	<author>pwfffff</author>
	<datestamp>1261131360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No android love?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No android love ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No android love?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489710</id>
	<title>I call bullshit, until I see a second source...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1261161600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...confirming it.</p><p>This is based on my previous experiences with the Apple RDB (reality distortion bubble), and how I have seen it make people want something so much, that they would even make it up.</p><p>I&rsquo;m not making a statement about its truth. Just that because of that, Apple news get a harder time. Microsoft for example would get an even harder time. Like with everything where you got burned too often, before.</p><p>On top of that, I have problems believing, that an in all points inferior phone (Compared to the crazy stuff they got in Japan. Not what&rsquo;s available in the US.) would dominate Japan... of all markets??</p><p>Anyone from Japan here, with a real world experience, of how many of the people he sees and knows got an iPhone?<br>It it rather close to half? Or rather rare? (Or where in-between?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...confirming it.This is based on my previous experiences with the Apple RDB ( reality distortion bubble ) , and how I have seen it make people want something so much , that they would even make it up.I    m not making a statement about its truth .
Just that because of that , Apple news get a harder time .
Microsoft for example would get an even harder time .
Like with everything where you got burned too often , before.On top of that , I have problems believing , that an in all points inferior phone ( Compared to the crazy stuff they got in Japan .
Not what    s available in the US .
) would dominate Japan... of all markets ?
? Anyone from Japan here , with a real world experience , of how many of the people he sees and knows got an iPhone ? It it rather close to half ?
Or rather rare ?
( Or where in-between ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...confirming it.This is based on my previous experiences with the Apple RDB (reality distortion bubble), and how I have seen it make people want something so much, that they would even make it up.I’m not making a statement about its truth.
Just that because of that, Apple news get a harder time.
Microsoft for example would get an even harder time.
Like with everything where you got burned too often, before.On top of that, I have problems believing, that an in all points inferior phone (Compared to the crazy stuff they got in Japan.
Not what’s available in the US.
) would dominate Japan... of all markets?
?Anyone from Japan here, with a real world experience, of how many of the people he sees and knows got an iPhone?It it rather close to half?
Or rather rare?
(Or where in-between?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492764</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the beef, er iPhones...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The key term is "Smartphone", where Smartphone is determined by whoever wants to determine it for whatever purpose. 46\% of the Smartphone market in Japan is still realistically only about 10 million units in a population of 120 million phone savvy users, and even 10 mill would be a push.</p><p>Bear in mind that around at most 40 million iPhones have been sold to date and at least half of these have been in the US but more realistically probably around 25 million if sales have managed to remain proportionate over the last year or so. America is Apple's real success story, because it was a neglected market for cell phones as they were years behind in cell phone tech compared to Europe and Japan so Apple did the smart thing and gave a market what it wanted. Despite hype like this article from pro-Apple sources, the iPhone is still only doing quite averagely in Europe and even then when it's shown to be "doing well" it's generally with false comparisons- for example, comparisons of the iPhone usually include the iPhone, the iPhone 3G and the iPhone 3GS all as one phone, whilst splitting competitors, such as say Nokia's, N95 and N96 phones which are no less different into separate handsets for statistical purposes then doing comparisons.</p><p>As phones go, when you split the iPhone more fairly into it's different handsets it's really not all that different to most other major handsets through the years- 10 to 15 mill units per version has been pretty much par for the course for all Nokia's high end phones for the last 5 - 10 years in fact.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The key term is " Smartphone " , where Smartphone is determined by whoever wants to determine it for whatever purpose .
46 \ % of the Smartphone market in Japan is still realistically only about 10 million units in a population of 120 million phone savvy users , and even 10 mill would be a push.Bear in mind that around at most 40 million iPhones have been sold to date and at least half of these have been in the US but more realistically probably around 25 million if sales have managed to remain proportionate over the last year or so .
America is Apple 's real success story , because it was a neglected market for cell phones as they were years behind in cell phone tech compared to Europe and Japan so Apple did the smart thing and gave a market what it wanted .
Despite hype like this article from pro-Apple sources , the iPhone is still only doing quite averagely in Europe and even then when it 's shown to be " doing well " it 's generally with false comparisons- for example , comparisons of the iPhone usually include the iPhone , the iPhone 3G and the iPhone 3GS all as one phone , whilst splitting competitors , such as say Nokia 's , N95 and N96 phones which are no less different into separate handsets for statistical purposes then doing comparisons.As phones go , when you split the iPhone more fairly into it 's different handsets it 's really not all that different to most other major handsets through the years- 10 to 15 mill units per version has been pretty much par for the course for all Nokia 's high end phones for the last 5 - 10 years in fact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The key term is "Smartphone", where Smartphone is determined by whoever wants to determine it for whatever purpose.
46\% of the Smartphone market in Japan is still realistically only about 10 million units in a population of 120 million phone savvy users, and even 10 mill would be a push.Bear in mind that around at most 40 million iPhones have been sold to date and at least half of these have been in the US but more realistically probably around 25 million if sales have managed to remain proportionate over the last year or so.
America is Apple's real success story, because it was a neglected market for cell phones as they were years behind in cell phone tech compared to Europe and Japan so Apple did the smart thing and gave a market what it wanted.
Despite hype like this article from pro-Apple sources, the iPhone is still only doing quite averagely in Europe and even then when it's shown to be "doing well" it's generally with false comparisons- for example, comparisons of the iPhone usually include the iPhone, the iPhone 3G and the iPhone 3GS all as one phone, whilst splitting competitors, such as say Nokia's, N95 and N96 phones which are no less different into separate handsets for statistical purposes then doing comparisons.As phones go, when you split the iPhone more fairly into it's different handsets it's really not all that different to most other major handsets through the years- 10 to 15 mill units per version has been pretty much par for the course for all Nokia's high end phones for the last 5 - 10 years in fact.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30503670</id>
	<title>Re:Bogus survey?</title>
	<author>dodobh</author>
	<datestamp>1261321440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Data transfer to/from the Amazon cloud is expensive. By using the signature of an embedded device, you get a much smaller and lighter page, which should also be easier to machine parse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Data transfer to/from the Amazon cloud is expensive .
By using the signature of an embedded device , you get a much smaller and lighter page , which should also be easier to machine parse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Data transfer to/from the Amazon cloud is expensive.
By using the signature of an embedded device, you get a much smaller and lighter page, which should also be easier to machine parse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492210</id>
	<title>Re:So why is XBox unpopular?</title>
	<author>kaizokuace</author>
	<datestamp>1261127160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh also, you know how in America we tell people its good to buy American products? Well in other countries they don't tell each other to buy American products like we do! In Japan they would be more likely to buy a Japanese product over American.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh also , you know how in America we tell people its good to buy American products ?
Well in other countries they do n't tell each other to buy American products like we do !
In Japan they would be more likely to buy a Japanese product over American .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh also, you know how in America we tell people its good to buy American products?
Well in other countries they don't tell each other to buy American products like we do!
In Japan they would be more likely to buy a Japanese product over American.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488768</id>
	<title>gumbo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261158180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First!</htmltext>
<tokenext>First !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489812</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the beef, er iPhones...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261161840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are ypu suggesting the figures are a bit <i>slant</i>ed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are ypu suggesting the figures are a bit slanted ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are ypu suggesting the figures are a bit slanted?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488866</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>Nadaka</author>
	<datestamp>1261158540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is an app for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is an app for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is an app for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491114</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the beef, er iPhones...</title>
	<author>MobyDisk</author>
	<datestamp>1261166220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A friend of mine just got back from Japan 2 weeks ago, and he said everyone had smart phones, and he didn't see one iPhone.  The most notable thing he saw was lots of Nintendo DSs being used as PDAs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A friend of mine just got back from Japan 2 weeks ago , and he said everyone had smart phones , and he did n't see one iPhone .
The most notable thing he saw was lots of Nintendo DSs being used as PDAs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A friend of mine just got back from Japan 2 weeks ago, and he said everyone had smart phones, and he didn't see one iPhone.
The most notable thing he saw was lots of Nintendo DSs being used as PDAs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495320</id>
	<title>Another out of context hype article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261143420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iPhone may have 46\% of the SMARTphone market in Japan but smartphones are not popular in Japan at all.</p><p>There's been no need for them. Non-smartphones do all the most useful things that users want and more in Japan. A typical Japanese NON-smart phone</p><p>*) Has a 5-12 megapixel camera<br>*) Browses the web just fine<br>*) Has 3D GPS based navigation<br>*) Receives digital TV signals with no carrier charge<br>*) Records those digital TV signals for later playback (pocket tivo)<br>*) Has it's own digital answering machine built in, no need for the phone company to record messages unless you have no signal and no need to call the phone company to hear your messages as they are already on the phone.<br>*) Has MP3/WMA/AAC playback<br>*) Plays games<br>*) Has RFID digital wireless payment system for paying for trains, subways, buses, vending machines, and most convenience stores.<br>*) Can download apps.<br>*) Has 2 displays, one inside the phone, one out.<br>*) Supports 500+ icon characters for email. (smiles, frowns, cakes, fireworks)</p><p>etc, etc, etc,</p><p>You only need to go on any train or subway car in Tokyo and look around and you'll notice it will take you 5 to 10 cars worth of people to see a single iPhone</p><p>Compare to say NYC or SF where you can go in any starbucks and it seems like every other person has an iPhone.</p><p>No, iPhone is no doing that well in Japan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iPhone may have 46 \ % of the SMARTphone market in Japan but smartphones are not popular in Japan at all.There 's been no need for them .
Non-smartphones do all the most useful things that users want and more in Japan .
A typical Japanese NON-smart phone * ) Has a 5-12 megapixel camera * ) Browses the web just fine * ) Has 3D GPS based navigation * ) Receives digital TV signals with no carrier charge * ) Records those digital TV signals for later playback ( pocket tivo ) * ) Has it 's own digital answering machine built in , no need for the phone company to record messages unless you have no signal and no need to call the phone company to hear your messages as they are already on the phone .
* ) Has MP3/WMA/AAC playback * ) Plays games * ) Has RFID digital wireless payment system for paying for trains , subways , buses , vending machines , and most convenience stores .
* ) Can download apps .
* ) Has 2 displays , one inside the phone , one out .
* ) Supports 500 + icon characters for email .
( smiles , frowns , cakes , fireworks ) etc , etc , etc,You only need to go on any train or subway car in Tokyo and look around and you 'll notice it will take you 5 to 10 cars worth of people to see a single iPhoneCompare to say NYC or SF where you can go in any starbucks and it seems like every other person has an iPhone.No , iPhone is no doing that well in Japan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iPhone may have 46\% of the SMARTphone market in Japan but smartphones are not popular in Japan at all.There's been no need for them.
Non-smartphones do all the most useful things that users want and more in Japan.
A typical Japanese NON-smart phone*) Has a 5-12 megapixel camera*) Browses the web just fine*) Has 3D GPS based navigation*) Receives digital TV signals with no carrier charge*) Records those digital TV signals for later playback (pocket tivo)*) Has it's own digital answering machine built in, no need for the phone company to record messages unless you have no signal and no need to call the phone company to hear your messages as they are already on the phone.
*) Has MP3/WMA/AAC playback*) Plays games*) Has RFID digital wireless payment system for paying for trains, subways, buses, vending machines, and most convenience stores.
*) Can download apps.
*) Has 2 displays, one inside the phone, one out.
*) Supports 500+ icon characters for email.
(smiles, frowns, cakes, fireworks)etc, etc, etc,You only need to go on any train or subway car in Tokyo and look around and you'll notice it will take you 5 to 10 cars worth of people to see a single iPhoneCompare to say NYC or SF where you can go in any starbucks and it seems like every other person has an iPhone.No, iPhone is no doing that well in Japan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489266</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the beef, er iPhones...</title>
	<author>introspekt.i</author>
	<datestamp>1261160040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The number may correspond to sales, not necessarily owned phones by the populace.  Japan is no miniscule pond, especially when it comes to phones.  I've seen endless stories about the highly advanced phone market in Japan.  Phones there are more advanced, because the phone users have evolved (like a Pikachu) to become more advanced and demand more features (like a thunderstone).  If you're talking about visibility from your perspective, I'd have to say that one perspective isn't relevant on such a large scale.  SEE: Hasty Generalization.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The number may correspond to sales , not necessarily owned phones by the populace .
Japan is no miniscule pond , especially when it comes to phones .
I 've seen endless stories about the highly advanced phone market in Japan .
Phones there are more advanced , because the phone users have evolved ( like a Pikachu ) to become more advanced and demand more features ( like a thunderstone ) .
If you 're talking about visibility from your perspective , I 'd have to say that one perspective is n't relevant on such a large scale .
SEE : Hasty Generalization .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The number may correspond to sales, not necessarily owned phones by the populace.
Japan is no miniscule pond, especially when it comes to phones.
I've seen endless stories about the highly advanced phone market in Japan.
Phones there are more advanced, because the phone users have evolved (like a Pikachu) to become more advanced and demand more features (like a thunderstone).
If you're talking about visibility from your perspective, I'd have to say that one perspective isn't relevant on such a large scale.
SEE: Hasty Generalization.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495694</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261147440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And we having CMs and sponsored "news" on tv about 24 for a few months. Just like Windows 7.</p><p>If Apple was to do that with their Mac line they would sell 46\% of computers here too.</p><p>iPhone is still crap compared to the 0 yen terminal I got last year. I am sure you haven't heard about it but all cellphones have crappy games and apps that you can buy, only that nobody uses them when they don't have to justify having bought an overpriced brick.</p><p>All I hear from people that actually think at least after buying is that the screen gets dirty soon and that they miss their keypads.</p><p>Most Japanese, however have no idea about product quality and will buy whatever's a fad - and as far as fads go this has been fueled by a lot of money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And we having CMs and sponsored " news " on tv about 24 for a few months .
Just like Windows 7.If Apple was to do that with their Mac line they would sell 46 \ % of computers here too.iPhone is still crap compared to the 0 yen terminal I got last year .
I am sure you have n't heard about it but all cellphones have crappy games and apps that you can buy , only that nobody uses them when they do n't have to justify having bought an overpriced brick.All I hear from people that actually think at least after buying is that the screen gets dirty soon and that they miss their keypads.Most Japanese , however have no idea about product quality and will buy whatever 's a fad - and as far as fads go this has been fueled by a lot of money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And we having CMs and sponsored "news" on tv about 24 for a few months.
Just like Windows 7.If Apple was to do that with their Mac line they would sell 46\% of computers here too.iPhone is still crap compared to the 0 yen terminal I got last year.
I am sure you haven't heard about it but all cellphones have crappy games and apps that you can buy, only that nobody uses them when they don't have to justify having bought an overpriced brick.All I hear from people that actually think at least after buying is that the screen gets dirty soon and that they miss their keypads.Most Japanese, however have no idea about product quality and will buy whatever's a fad - and as far as fads go this has been fueled by a lot of money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489588</id>
	<title>Re:Remember when smartphone meant something?</title>
	<author>SignalFreq</author>
	<datestamp>1261161240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Their definition seems pretty broad, basically any phone that can run any of the smartphone OSs.  More interesting is that the iPhone's main competitor, the W-Zero3, was built and released in 2005, 2 years before the iPhone American release in 2007 and 3 years before the Japanese release.  The W-Zero3 has equal or better features with the exception of a touchscreen.  So the iPhone is winning the market in Japan based upon marketing and the interface.<br>
<br>
I own an iPhone.  I am definitely moving away from it as soon as my contract expires... a few reasons: 1) horrible battery life with 3G usage, 2) lack of MMS, and 3) AT&amp;T's network is sub-standard (I experience 2-3 dropped calls every day).<br>
<br>
Interestingly, my wife refuses to use any iPhone, since the touchscreen never responds accurately to her touch. Most of her friends have similar issues, and now that I think about it, I don't see many women using an iPhone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Their definition seems pretty broad , basically any phone that can run any of the smartphone OSs .
More interesting is that the iPhone 's main competitor , the W-Zero3 , was built and released in 2005 , 2 years before the iPhone American release in 2007 and 3 years before the Japanese release .
The W-Zero3 has equal or better features with the exception of a touchscreen .
So the iPhone is winning the market in Japan based upon marketing and the interface .
I own an iPhone .
I am definitely moving away from it as soon as my contract expires... a few reasons : 1 ) horrible battery life with 3G usage , 2 ) lack of MMS , and 3 ) AT&amp;T 's network is sub-standard ( I experience 2-3 dropped calls every day ) .
Interestingly , my wife refuses to use any iPhone , since the touchscreen never responds accurately to her touch .
Most of her friends have similar issues , and now that I think about it , I do n't see many women using an iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their definition seems pretty broad, basically any phone that can run any of the smartphone OSs.
More interesting is that the iPhone's main competitor, the W-Zero3, was built and released in 2005, 2 years before the iPhone American release in 2007 and 3 years before the Japanese release.
The W-Zero3 has equal or better features with the exception of a touchscreen.
So the iPhone is winning the market in Japan based upon marketing and the interface.
I own an iPhone.
I am definitely moving away from it as soon as my contract expires... a few reasons: 1) horrible battery life with 3G usage, 2) lack of MMS, and 3) AT&amp;T's network is sub-standard (I experience 2-3 dropped calls every day).
Interestingly, my wife refuses to use any iPhone, since the touchscreen never responds accurately to her touch.
Most of her friends have similar issues, and now that I think about it, I don't see many women using an iPhone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489130</id>
	<title>Re:So why is XBox unpopular?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261159560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Given that every game a Japanese Teenager would want to play (Meaning Anime style Haircuits and/or cool swords and guns) came out exclusively for the PS3.</p> </div><p>

Actually, though, lots of J-RPGs are out for the 360 first. For example, Tales of Vesperia, Star Ocean: The Last Hope and other RPGs were released on the 360 then given an enhanced remake for the PS3.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that every game a Japanese Teenager would want to play ( Meaning Anime style Haircuits and/or cool swords and guns ) came out exclusively for the PS3 .
Actually , though , lots of J-RPGs are out for the 360 first .
For example , Tales of Vesperia , Star Ocean : The Last Hope and other RPGs were released on the 360 then given an enhanced remake for the PS3 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Given that every game a Japanese Teenager would want to play (Meaning Anime style Haircuits and/or cool swords and guns) came out exclusively for the PS3.
Actually, though, lots of J-RPGs are out for the 360 first.
For example, Tales of Vesperia, Star Ocean: The Last Hope and other RPGs were released on the 360 then given an enhanced remake for the PS3.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495984</id>
	<title>Re:Nice try, but no.</title>
	<author>rdnetto</author>
	<datestamp>1261150080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Also most people prefer the keypad over a keyboard for entering Japanese into their phones. This is just how Japanese is. So all those keypad phones are also unpopular.</p></div><p>There's a reason for that: the English alphabet has 26 letters in it, but <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiragana" title="wikipedia.org">hiragana</a> [wikipedia.org] (the most common Japanese alphabet) has 48 symbols, excluding diacritics and digraphs. In other words, a full hiragana keyboard would be too big. They probably don't care too much about a keypad based input when most of their writing ends up being converted to kanji anyway.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also most people prefer the keypad over a keyboard for entering Japanese into their phones .
This is just how Japanese is .
So all those keypad phones are also unpopular.There 's a reason for that : the English alphabet has 26 letters in it , but hiragana [ wikipedia.org ] ( the most common Japanese alphabet ) has 48 symbols , excluding diacritics and digraphs .
In other words , a full hiragana keyboard would be too big .
They probably do n't care too much about a keypad based input when most of their writing ends up being converted to kanji anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also most people prefer the keypad over a keyboard for entering Japanese into their phones.
This is just how Japanese is.
So all those keypad phones are also unpopular.There's a reason for that: the English alphabet has 26 letters in it, but hiragana [wikipedia.org] (the most common Japanese alphabet) has 48 symbols, excluding diacritics and digraphs.
In other words, a full hiragana keyboard would be too big.
They probably don't care too much about a keypad based input when most of their writing ends up being converted to kanji anyway.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495378</id>
	<title>"Smartphone" is ill-defined</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1261144020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except it's not "so popular" everywhere else - market share is a few percent.</p><p>The flaw in this article is that it's restricted it to the arbitrary ill-defined of "smartphone" which is assumed to include the Iphone, but not the vast range of "feature" phones that can still do Internet, run apps, and so on. If you took a stricter definition of phones - e.g., one that could run any 3rd party apps (as opposed to only those approved by the company), can multitask with 3rd party apps, has a real keyboard etc, then the Iphone is not a smartphone. If you take a definition broad enough to include it, then you include most feature phones.</p><p>So what's the Iphone's real market share in Japan?</p><p>Another point - presumably before this, another phone would have had the largest share in this ill-defined category. Note how we didn't get a story about that?</p><p>This story is as laughable as that one we had when the Iphone was the best selling phone in one random country for one month (right after the release of a new Iphone model). Note how since then, we've <i>never</i> had any articles for any month, for any country, of what the best selling phone is? Even though clearly you could have a story for every country, every single month, for some reason it's only notable when it's the Iphone. (So the fact that the Iphone has only been best selling for one month, in only one country, is surely quite bad...)</p><p>Today I bought myself a Nokia 5800. Great phone and at a decent price - but from reading Slashdot, I'd never even known it exists. News for nerds? Not anymore - I rely on the mainstream press now to find out news about the market leaders in this area.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except it 's not " so popular " everywhere else - market share is a few percent.The flaw in this article is that it 's restricted it to the arbitrary ill-defined of " smartphone " which is assumed to include the Iphone , but not the vast range of " feature " phones that can still do Internet , run apps , and so on .
If you took a stricter definition of phones - e.g. , one that could run any 3rd party apps ( as opposed to only those approved by the company ) , can multitask with 3rd party apps , has a real keyboard etc , then the Iphone is not a smartphone .
If you take a definition broad enough to include it , then you include most feature phones.So what 's the Iphone 's real market share in Japan ? Another point - presumably before this , another phone would have had the largest share in this ill-defined category .
Note how we did n't get a story about that ? This story is as laughable as that one we had when the Iphone was the best selling phone in one random country for one month ( right after the release of a new Iphone model ) .
Note how since then , we 've never had any articles for any month , for any country , of what the best selling phone is ?
Even though clearly you could have a story for every country , every single month , for some reason it 's only notable when it 's the Iphone .
( So the fact that the Iphone has only been best selling for one month , in only one country , is surely quite bad... ) Today I bought myself a Nokia 5800 .
Great phone and at a decent price - but from reading Slashdot , I 'd never even known it exists .
News for nerds ?
Not anymore - I rely on the mainstream press now to find out news about the market leaders in this area .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except it's not "so popular" everywhere else - market share is a few percent.The flaw in this article is that it's restricted it to the arbitrary ill-defined of "smartphone" which is assumed to include the Iphone, but not the vast range of "feature" phones that can still do Internet, run apps, and so on.
If you took a stricter definition of phones - e.g., one that could run any 3rd party apps (as opposed to only those approved by the company), can multitask with 3rd party apps, has a real keyboard etc, then the Iphone is not a smartphone.
If you take a definition broad enough to include it, then you include most feature phones.So what's the Iphone's real market share in Japan?Another point - presumably before this, another phone would have had the largest share in this ill-defined category.
Note how we didn't get a story about that?This story is as laughable as that one we had when the Iphone was the best selling phone in one random country for one month (right after the release of a new Iphone model).
Note how since then, we've never had any articles for any month, for any country, of what the best selling phone is?
Even though clearly you could have a story for every country, every single month, for some reason it's only notable when it's the Iphone.
(So the fact that the Iphone has only been best selling for one month, in only one country, is surely quite bad...)Today I bought myself a Nokia 5800.
Great phone and at a decent price - but from reading Slashdot, I'd never even known it exists.
News for nerds?
Not anymore - I rely on the mainstream press now to find out news about the market leaders in this area.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489802</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261161780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, the REAL truth is that the Japanese just want to seem superior to the rest of the world, when those of us who have been there know they're just like any other country.  Then again, this seems to be true for most of Asia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , the REAL truth is that the Japanese just want to seem superior to the rest of the world , when those of us who have been there know they 're just like any other country .
Then again , this seems to be true for most of Asia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, the REAL truth is that the Japanese just want to seem superior to the rest of the world, when those of us who have been there know they're just like any other country.
Then again, this seems to be true for most of Asia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488940</id>
	<title>Is there an app for that?</title>
	<author>wandazulu</author>
	<datestamp>1261158840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's my understanding that the average Japanese person is more likely to have a phone than a computer, and that the phone can do pretty much everything a computer can (albeit with a much smaller screen), including playing MMOs, watching TV, etc. While I can see why people might like the bigger screen, does the iPhone have the apps/functionality that the Japanese user wants?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's my understanding that the average Japanese person is more likely to have a phone than a computer , and that the phone can do pretty much everything a computer can ( albeit with a much smaller screen ) , including playing MMOs , watching TV , etc .
While I can see why people might like the bigger screen , does the iPhone have the apps/functionality that the Japanese user wants ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's my understanding that the average Japanese person is more likely to have a phone than a computer, and that the phone can do pretty much everything a computer can (albeit with a much smaller screen), including playing MMOs, watching TV, etc.
While I can see why people might like the bigger screen, does the iPhone have the apps/functionality that the Japanese user wants?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491306</id>
	<title>Re:bullshit...</title>
	<author>aristotle-dude</author>
	<datestamp>1261167000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It is back when engadget suddenly declared '99\% of smartphone traffic on our mobile-specific website is from iphone' - the reason was that blackberry was identifying itself as full browser while engadget only targetted mobile specific browser and did the calculation.</p></div><p>Did you pull that out of your ass? Are you telling me that the default blackberry browser impersonated another browser? They would have the user agent string for blackberry devices in their logs.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is back when engadget suddenly declared '99 \ % of smartphone traffic on our mobile-specific website is from iphone ' - the reason was that blackberry was identifying itself as full browser while engadget only targetted mobile specific browser and did the calculation.Did you pull that out of your ass ?
Are you telling me that the default blackberry browser impersonated another browser ?
They would have the user agent string for blackberry devices in their logs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is back when engadget suddenly declared '99\% of smartphone traffic on our mobile-specific website is from iphone' - the reason was that blackberry was identifying itself as full browser while engadget only targetted mobile specific browser and did the calculation.Did you pull that out of your ass?
Are you telling me that the default blackberry browser impersonated another browser?
They would have the user agent string for blackberry devices in their logs.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489494</id>
	<title>Re:So why is XBox unpopular?</title>
	<author>b1t r0t</author>
	<datestamp>1261160880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's mostly because Xbox hardware is a piece of crap that dies easily. And the Japanese don't take that kind of shit lightly, especially when a company tries to hide he magnitude of the problem.
</p><p>It doesn't help any that in Japanese culture, the "X" symbol indicates failure, and there is also a kanji with an "X" in a box (unicode 51F6) that means "bad luck" and "disaster".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's mostly because Xbox hardware is a piece of crap that dies easily .
And the Japanese do n't take that kind of shit lightly , especially when a company tries to hide he magnitude of the problem .
It does n't help any that in Japanese culture , the " X " symbol indicates failure , and there is also a kanji with an " X " in a box ( unicode 51F6 ) that means " bad luck " and " disaster " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's mostly because Xbox hardware is a piece of crap that dies easily.
And the Japanese don't take that kind of shit lightly, especially when a company tries to hide he magnitude of the problem.
It doesn't help any that in Japanese culture, the "X" symbol indicates failure, and there is also a kanji with an "X" in a box (unicode 51F6) that means "bad luck" and "disaster".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489864</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>In certain senses they are, in certain senses they aren't. I'd argue that it really goes back to mean by "cellphone" and "being ahead in cellphones".<br> <br>

Traditionally, both because of technical necessity(tiny batteries, weak processors) and the telcom tradition(dumb edges, smart network) cellphones have existed on a sort of continuum between "dumb" phones(more or less basic handsets, with address book, spartan calendar, maybe an alarm function) and "feature" phones(still more or less inflexible, you get what the manufacturer and the carrier give you; but they give you all kinds of bells and whistles. MMS/Camera with actual lense/QR Codes/WAP browser/ carrier audio/video store/embedded payment widgetry/etc/etc/etc/).<br> <br>

On that historic continuum, Japanese phones are overwhelmingly further toward the "feature" end than American phones are. American tech writers compare the spec lists of American and Japanese phones, and note that the latter are far longer, ergo they must be more futuristic. <br> <br>

Something like the iPhone(or WebOS devices, or Android), by contrast, doesn't really fall onto the dumbphone/featurephone continuum in any terribly useful way. Rather, these devices philosophically derive from the model of an internet-connected computer, that happens to have a more-or-less endurable set of phone features included.<br> <br>

Those commentators judging the new smartphone devices according to where they fell on the dumbphone/featurephone spectrum were inclined(correctly) to say that the iPhone and its ilk were inferior to existing devices. Particularly earlier variants(No MMS? No push email? shit camera? all worse than existing featurephone offerings). What they missed, though, is that the smartphone is a fundamentally superior model, by virtue of being overwhelmingly more flexible and powerful than the fixed function phones, even if they happened to have a fairly large number of fixed functions.<br> <br>

The fact that Apple generally knows their shit RE: UI design matters as well. Arguably, Microsoft was actually among the first to give the notion of the "smartphone" in the contemporary sense, a serious try. Cellular modem; but with a fairly powerful embedded platform, running an OS with explicit support for third party applications and the notion that they would be talking to the internet(even if MS would prefer that most of that talking just involve an activesync connection back to your corporate exchange server). All great in principle, it's just that windows mobile fucking sucked. Blackberries(which were entirely then, and still to a degree, are much closer to being "featurephones with really good email" than "smartphones") were a much better choice.<br> <br>

The iPhone was in the interesting position of being (arguably) the first "smartphone" well executed enough(and running on powerful enough hardware) to outcompete the far less flexible, but far more mature, "featurephone" segment for a large number of people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In certain senses they are , in certain senses they are n't .
I 'd argue that it really goes back to mean by " cellphone " and " being ahead in cellphones " .
Traditionally , both because of technical necessity ( tiny batteries , weak processors ) and the telcom tradition ( dumb edges , smart network ) cellphones have existed on a sort of continuum between " dumb " phones ( more or less basic handsets , with address book , spartan calendar , maybe an alarm function ) and " feature " phones ( still more or less inflexible , you get what the manufacturer and the carrier give you ; but they give you all kinds of bells and whistles .
MMS/Camera with actual lense/QR Codes/WAP browser/ carrier audio/video store/embedded payment widgetry/etc/etc/etc/ ) .
On that historic continuum , Japanese phones are overwhelmingly further toward the " feature " end than American phones are .
American tech writers compare the spec lists of American and Japanese phones , and note that the latter are far longer , ergo they must be more futuristic .
Something like the iPhone ( or WebOS devices , or Android ) , by contrast , does n't really fall onto the dumbphone/featurephone continuum in any terribly useful way .
Rather , these devices philosophically derive from the model of an internet-connected computer , that happens to have a more-or-less endurable set of phone features included .
Those commentators judging the new smartphone devices according to where they fell on the dumbphone/featurephone spectrum were inclined ( correctly ) to say that the iPhone and its ilk were inferior to existing devices .
Particularly earlier variants ( No MMS ?
No push email ?
shit camera ?
all worse than existing featurephone offerings ) .
What they missed , though , is that the smartphone is a fundamentally superior model , by virtue of being overwhelmingly more flexible and powerful than the fixed function phones , even if they happened to have a fairly large number of fixed functions .
The fact that Apple generally knows their shit RE : UI design matters as well .
Arguably , Microsoft was actually among the first to give the notion of the " smartphone " in the contemporary sense , a serious try .
Cellular modem ; but with a fairly powerful embedded platform , running an OS with explicit support for third party applications and the notion that they would be talking to the internet ( even if MS would prefer that most of that talking just involve an activesync connection back to your corporate exchange server ) .
All great in principle , it 's just that windows mobile fucking sucked .
Blackberries ( which were entirely then , and still to a degree , are much closer to being " featurephones with really good email " than " smartphones " ) were a much better choice .
The iPhone was in the interesting position of being ( arguably ) the first " smartphone " well executed enough ( and running on powerful enough hardware ) to outcompete the far less flexible , but far more mature , " featurephone " segment for a large number of people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In certain senses they are, in certain senses they aren't.
I'd argue that it really goes back to mean by "cellphone" and "being ahead in cellphones".
Traditionally, both because of technical necessity(tiny batteries, weak processors) and the telcom tradition(dumb edges, smart network) cellphones have existed on a sort of continuum between "dumb" phones(more or less basic handsets, with address book, spartan calendar, maybe an alarm function) and "feature" phones(still more or less inflexible, you get what the manufacturer and the carrier give you; but they give you all kinds of bells and whistles.
MMS/Camera with actual lense/QR Codes/WAP browser/ carrier audio/video store/embedded payment widgetry/etc/etc/etc/).
On that historic continuum, Japanese phones are overwhelmingly further toward the "feature" end than American phones are.
American tech writers compare the spec lists of American and Japanese phones, and note that the latter are far longer, ergo they must be more futuristic.
Something like the iPhone(or WebOS devices, or Android), by contrast, doesn't really fall onto the dumbphone/featurephone continuum in any terribly useful way.
Rather, these devices philosophically derive from the model of an internet-connected computer, that happens to have a more-or-less endurable set of phone features included.
Those commentators judging the new smartphone devices according to where they fell on the dumbphone/featurephone spectrum were inclined(correctly) to say that the iPhone and its ilk were inferior to existing devices.
Particularly earlier variants(No MMS?
No push email?
shit camera?
all worse than existing featurephone offerings).
What they missed, though, is that the smartphone is a fundamentally superior model, by virtue of being overwhelmingly more flexible and powerful than the fixed function phones, even if they happened to have a fairly large number of fixed functions.
The fact that Apple generally knows their shit RE: UI design matters as well.
Arguably, Microsoft was actually among the first to give the notion of the "smartphone" in the contemporary sense, a serious try.
Cellular modem; but with a fairly powerful embedded platform, running an OS with explicit support for third party applications and the notion that they would be talking to the internet(even if MS would prefer that most of that talking just involve an activesync connection back to your corporate exchange server).
All great in principle, it's just that windows mobile fucking sucked.
Blackberries(which were entirely then, and still to a degree, are much closer to being "featurephones with really good email" than "smartphones") were a much better choice.
The iPhone was in the interesting position of being (arguably) the first "smartphone" well executed enough(and running on powerful enough hardware) to outcompete the far less flexible, but far more mature, "featurephone" segment for a large number of people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489956</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>alen</author>
	<datestamp>1261162320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they aren't advanced, they have more crazy features we don't care about here like reading your body sweat or buying a soda using a cell phone. the UI's have sucked for years since the companies have always been on thin margins. the reason why none of this stuff comes out in the US is because kids in Japan live with parents for a lot longer and have more money to spend. in the US kids like to move out and they have less disposable income since they have bills to pay. other features like buying from vending machines are useless since everyone takes credit cards or you buy a 24 pack at the grocery store and take it to work with you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they are n't advanced , they have more crazy features we do n't care about here like reading your body sweat or buying a soda using a cell phone .
the UI 's have sucked for years since the companies have always been on thin margins .
the reason why none of this stuff comes out in the US is because kids in Japan live with parents for a lot longer and have more money to spend .
in the US kids like to move out and they have less disposable income since they have bills to pay .
other features like buying from vending machines are useless since everyone takes credit cards or you buy a 24 pack at the grocery store and take it to work with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they aren't advanced, they have more crazy features we don't care about here like reading your body sweat or buying a soda using a cell phone.
the UI's have sucked for years since the companies have always been on thin margins.
the reason why none of this stuff comes out in the US is because kids in Japan live with parents for a lot longer and have more money to spend.
in the US kids like to move out and they have less disposable income since they have bills to pay.
other features like buying from vending machines are useless since everyone takes credit cards or you buy a 24 pack at the grocery store and take it to work with you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30499064</id>
	<title>Re:Better Article at Engadget Mobile</title>
	<author>psnyder</author>
	<datestamp>1261244640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly!  I recently moved back to Japan, looked for a new cellphone, and noticed the extremely limited choices of smartphones (about 5 out of 100 available phones).<br> <br>

There are 2 main phone carriers (<a href="http://mb.softbank.jp/en/products/" title="softbank.jp">Softbank</a> [softbank.jp] and <a href="http://www.nttdocomo.co.jp/english/product/" title="nttdocomo.co.jp">Docomo</a> [nttdocomo.co.jp]) and 1 less popular but still large option (<a href="http://www.au.kddi.com/english/product/index.html" title="kddi.com">AU</a> [kddi.com]).  These links go directly to their current phone lineups (in English), so you can go to the source and see what they're selling today.<br> <br>

Softbank offers the iPhone and a Window's mobile phone.  Docomo offers a Blackberry, a Google phone, and a Window's mobile phone.  Other than that, I don't think any of those other phones are considered "smartphones".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly !
I recently moved back to Japan , looked for a new cellphone , and noticed the extremely limited choices of smartphones ( about 5 out of 100 available phones ) .
There are 2 main phone carriers ( Softbank [ softbank.jp ] and Docomo [ nttdocomo.co.jp ] ) and 1 less popular but still large option ( AU [ kddi.com ] ) .
These links go directly to their current phone lineups ( in English ) , so you can go to the source and see what they 're selling today .
Softbank offers the iPhone and a Window 's mobile phone .
Docomo offers a Blackberry , a Google phone , and a Window 's mobile phone .
Other than that , I do n't think any of those other phones are considered " smartphones " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly!
I recently moved back to Japan, looked for a new cellphone, and noticed the extremely limited choices of smartphones (about 5 out of 100 available phones).
There are 2 main phone carriers (Softbank [softbank.jp] and Docomo [nttdocomo.co.jp]) and 1 less popular but still large option (AU [kddi.com]).
These links go directly to their current phone lineups (in English), so you can go to the source and see what they're selling today.
Softbank offers the iPhone and a Window's mobile phone.
Docomo offers a Blackberry, a Google phone, and a Window's mobile phone.
Other than that, I don't think any of those other phones are considered "smartphones".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492466</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>BKX</author>
	<datestamp>1261127940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's great and insightful comments like this that make me wish comment ratings went to eleven (also, I like parentheses (really, I do (really<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)))).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's great and insightful comments like this that make me wish comment ratings went to eleven ( also , I like parentheses ( really , I do ( really : ) ) ) ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's great and insightful comments like this that make me wish comment ratings went to eleven (also, I like parentheses (really, I do (really :)))).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489046</id>
	<title>Math Skill - there appears to be no app for that</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261159260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok. Iphone has 46\% of smart phone market. It cut the leader lead from 27\% to 13.5\%. So the Leader has 59.5\% of the market and Iphone 46\%. Guess all the other smart phones are in negative numbers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok. Iphone has 46 \ % of smart phone market .
It cut the leader lead from 27 \ % to 13.5 \ % .
So the Leader has 59.5 \ % of the market and Iphone 46 \ % .
Guess all the other smart phones are in negative numbers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok. Iphone has 46\% of smart phone market.
It cut the leader lead from 27\% to 13.5\%.
So the Leader has 59.5\% of the market and Iphone 46\%.
Guess all the other smart phones are in negative numbers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30494172</id>
	<title>Re:Bogus survey?</title>
	<author>Chris Pimlott</author>
	<datestamp>1261135740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps applications running on EC2 are proxying connections from their iPhone users to your site.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps applications running on EC2 are proxying connections from their iPhone users to your site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps applications running on EC2 are proxying connections from their iPhone users to your site.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762</id>
	<title>Great news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261158180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And we all know why it's popular... It's so easy to watch tentacle themed animation!</htmltext>
<tokenext>And we all know why it 's popular... It 's so easy to watch tentacle themed animation !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And we all know why it's popular... It's so easy to watch tentacle themed animation!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489298</id>
	<title>Re:So why is XBox unpopular?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261160160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's simpler then that: The Xbox has  games which mainly involve blowing things up. In terms of their culture, the Japanese prefer more subtle ways of inflicting damage.  <br> <br>Think of it like Pirate vs. Ninja. Would a ninja approve of the majority of Xbox games? No. Would a Pirate? Heck yes!! Are the japanese pirates or ninjas?
<br> <br>
I think the answer is pretty obvious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's simpler then that : The Xbox has games which mainly involve blowing things up .
In terms of their culture , the Japanese prefer more subtle ways of inflicting damage .
Think of it like Pirate vs. Ninja. Would a ninja approve of the majority of Xbox games ?
No. Would a Pirate ?
Heck yes ! !
Are the japanese pirates or ninjas ?
I think the answer is pretty obvious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's simpler then that: The Xbox has  games which mainly involve blowing things up.
In terms of their culture, the Japanese prefer more subtle ways of inflicting damage.
Think of it like Pirate vs. Ninja. Would a ninja approve of the majority of Xbox games?
No. Would a Pirate?
Heck yes!!
Are the japanese pirates or ninjas?
I think the answer is pretty obvious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489238</id>
	<title>Re:Broad definition</title>
	<author>Mekkah</author>
	<datestamp>1261159920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it includes every device, wouldn't it be much harder for the iPhone to obtain 46\%, so this would be a much more impressive achievement?  I'd have to think that they narrowed the definition down for this study, to give them a much higher share than one might think..</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it includes every device , would n't it be much harder for the iPhone to obtain 46 \ % , so this would be a much more impressive achievement ?
I 'd have to think that they narrowed the definition down for this study , to give them a much higher share than one might think. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it includes every device, wouldn't it be much harder for the iPhone to obtain 46\%, so this would be a much more impressive achievement?
I'd have to think that they narrowed the definition down for this study, to give them a much higher share than one might think..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489250</id>
	<title>Interesting</title>
	<author>mcsqueak</author>
	<datestamp>1261159980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was in Tokyo this past September, and I do remember spotting the iPhone there. However, it seems that many more people had flip phones. The typical flip phone style I saw was larger than those found here in America, to accommodate a bigger screen, and flatter then you'd see here. Many could do things such as watch TV, as my friend demonstrated on his phone.

</p><p>I don't ever remember seeing a TV commercial for the iPhone, or any subway/train ads for the iPhone. I do remember seeing subway ads for other phones. And for Google, heh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was in Tokyo this past September , and I do remember spotting the iPhone there .
However , it seems that many more people had flip phones .
The typical flip phone style I saw was larger than those found here in America , to accommodate a bigger screen , and flatter then you 'd see here .
Many could do things such as watch TV , as my friend demonstrated on his phone .
I do n't ever remember seeing a TV commercial for the iPhone , or any subway/train ads for the iPhone .
I do remember seeing subway ads for other phones .
And for Google , heh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was in Tokyo this past September, and I do remember spotting the iPhone there.
However, it seems that many more people had flip phones.
The typical flip phone style I saw was larger than those found here in America, to accommodate a bigger screen, and flatter then you'd see here.
Many could do things such as watch TV, as my friend demonstrated on his phone.
I don't ever remember seeing a TV commercial for the iPhone, or any subway/train ads for the iPhone.
I do remember seeing subway ads for other phones.
And for Google, heh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490574</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>A12m0v</author>
	<datestamp>1261164240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time\_Machine\_(Apple\_software)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Apple just did.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple just did .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple just did.
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489784</id>
	<title>/. 's marketing dept.</title>
	<author>recharged95</author>
	<datestamp>1261161720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And why is this news?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And why is this news ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And why is this news?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30541384</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259769540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TV commercials for the iPhone are VERY common in Japan now.  September was a LONG time ago in the IT world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TV commercials for the iPhone are VERY common in Japan now .
September was a LONG time ago in the IT world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TV commercials for the iPhone are VERY common in Japan now.
September was a LONG time ago in the IT world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490968</id>
	<title>Re:Remember when smartphone meant something?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261165680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nope, she doesn't have long nails. She thinks it may be because her hands are usually cold, though I'm not convinced.  She does use moisturizing lotion and hand sanitizer fairly often, which I think that is a more likely cause for poor conduction.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope , she does n't have long nails .
She thinks it may be because her hands are usually cold , though I 'm not convinced .
She does use moisturizing lotion and hand sanitizer fairly often , which I think that is a more likely cause for poor conduction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope, she doesn't have long nails.
She thinks it may be because her hands are usually cold, though I'm not convinced.
She does use moisturizing lotion and hand sanitizer fairly often, which I think that is a more likely cause for poor conduction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497718</id>
	<title>Re:"Smartphone" is ill-defined</title>
	<author>AmiMoJo</author>
	<datestamp>1261224780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's also worth mentioning that the iPhone has had some pretty aggressive deals in Japan. When I was there earlier this year they were offering the phone and your choice of a free Nintendo DS or PSP for free on a ~4500yen contract (about &pound;30/$50 a month).</p><p>The parent is right about the definition of "smartphone". Even basic Japanese phones would be considered smartphones by our standards as they have a camera, web browser, MP3 player, email, sync capabilities etc. In fact they don't use text messaging in Japan, only email.</p><p>The OP is grandparent right that the iPhone is a bit basic by Japanese standards. The 3GS has a much better camera which makes it more competitive, but it doesn't have a TV tuner or touch payment system. The latter is really useful, especially if you get paid for expenses because it gives you a fully itemised bill of everything you buy with it. It also cuts out the need for train/bus tickets or carrying cash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's also worth mentioning that the iPhone has had some pretty aggressive deals in Japan .
When I was there earlier this year they were offering the phone and your choice of a free Nintendo DS or PSP for free on a ~ 4500yen contract ( about   30/ $ 50 a month ) .The parent is right about the definition of " smartphone " .
Even basic Japanese phones would be considered smartphones by our standards as they have a camera , web browser , MP3 player , email , sync capabilities etc .
In fact they do n't use text messaging in Japan , only email.The OP is grandparent right that the iPhone is a bit basic by Japanese standards .
The 3GS has a much better camera which makes it more competitive , but it does n't have a TV tuner or touch payment system .
The latter is really useful , especially if you get paid for expenses because it gives you a fully itemised bill of everything you buy with it .
It also cuts out the need for train/bus tickets or carrying cash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's also worth mentioning that the iPhone has had some pretty aggressive deals in Japan.
When I was there earlier this year they were offering the phone and your choice of a free Nintendo DS or PSP for free on a ~4500yen contract (about £30/$50 a month).The parent is right about the definition of "smartphone".
Even basic Japanese phones would be considered smartphones by our standards as they have a camera, web browser, MP3 player, email, sync capabilities etc.
In fact they don't use text messaging in Japan, only email.The OP is grandparent right that the iPhone is a bit basic by Japanese standards.
The 3GS has a much better camera which makes it more competitive, but it doesn't have a TV tuner or touch payment system.
The latter is really useful, especially if you get paid for expenses because it gives you a fully itemised bill of everything you buy with it.
It also cuts out the need for train/bus tickets or carrying cash.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491280</id>
	<title>Re:The summary lies! It's 24.6\% Not 46\%!</title>
	<author>steve\_bryan</author>
	<datestamp>1261166880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From an earlier reader of the report: <i>The 3G has 24.6\% of the market. The 3GS has 21.5\% of the market. That adds up to roughly 46\%.</i></p><p>Apple has sold three models of the iPhone but only the 3G and 3GS work with the more advanced networks in foreign markets. It seems fair (and involve absolutely no distortion field at all) to combine the shares for both current models.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From an earlier reader of the report : The 3G has 24.6 \ % of the market .
The 3GS has 21.5 \ % of the market .
That adds up to roughly 46 \ % .Apple has sold three models of the iPhone but only the 3G and 3GS work with the more advanced networks in foreign markets .
It seems fair ( and involve absolutely no distortion field at all ) to combine the shares for both current models .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From an earlier reader of the report: The 3G has 24.6\% of the market.
The 3GS has 21.5\% of the market.
That adds up to roughly 46\%.Apple has sold three models of the iPhone but only the 3G and 3GS work with the more advanced networks in foreign markets.
It seems fair (and involve absolutely no distortion field at all) to combine the shares for both current models.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>TheKidWho</author>
	<datestamp>1261159620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm actually confused, I thought from reading around on slashdot that Japanese phones were 10+ years ahead of American ones?  How did we catch up so quickly? Who invented the Time Machine?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm actually confused , I thought from reading around on slashdot that Japanese phones were 10 + years ahead of American ones ?
How did we catch up so quickly ?
Who invented the Time Machine ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm actually confused, I thought from reading around on slashdot that Japanese phones were 10+ years ahead of American ones?
How did we catch up so quickly?
Who invented the Time Machine?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30496630</id>
	<title>Re:Better Article at Engadget Mobile</title>
	<author>grouchomarxist</author>
	<datestamp>1261159140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I commute on the Tokyo subway everyday and recently I've noticed a good number of iPhones. Pretty much one every time I ride. I've also seen a fair number on the streets. Of course, this is only anecdotal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I commute on the Tokyo subway everyday and recently I 've noticed a good number of iPhones .
Pretty much one every time I ride .
I 've also seen a fair number on the streets .
Of course , this is only anecdotal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I commute on the Tokyo subway everyday and recently I've noticed a good number of iPhones.
Pretty much one every time I ride.
I've also seen a fair number on the streets.
Of course, this is only anecdotal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492100</id>
	<title>Re:Better Article at Engadget Mobile</title>
	<author>PeeweeJD</author>
	<datestamp>1261169940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I spent a week in Tokyo back in November.  When I was there, I saw 2 iPhones in the wild.  Both were owned by the Americans I was traveling with.  That is also 2 more than the number of Blackberries I noticed (besides the one I have).</p><p>Everyone there has these flip phones with these really tall screens that rotate 90 degrees to "landscape" mode (they also watch TV on them).</p><p>So yeah, US style "smartphones" are not really used.  They use these mutant flip phones instead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I spent a week in Tokyo back in November .
When I was there , I saw 2 iPhones in the wild .
Both were owned by the Americans I was traveling with .
That is also 2 more than the number of Blackberries I noticed ( besides the one I have ) .Everyone there has these flip phones with these really tall screens that rotate 90 degrees to " landscape " mode ( they also watch TV on them ) .So yeah , US style " smartphones " are not really used .
They use these mutant flip phones instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I spent a week in Tokyo back in November.
When I was there, I saw 2 iPhones in the wild.
Both were owned by the Americans I was traveling with.
That is also 2 more than the number of Blackberries I noticed (besides the one I have).Everyone there has these flip phones with these really tall screens that rotate 90 degrees to "landscape" mode (they also watch TV on them).So yeah, US style "smartphones" are not really used.
They use these mutant flip phones instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490180</id>
	<title>Re:Remember when smartphone meant something?</title>
	<author>AnotherShep</author>
	<datestamp>1261162980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let me guess.  She tries to use her fingernail and tap, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me guess .
She tries to use her fingernail and tap , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me guess.
She tries to use her fingernail and tap, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490770</id>
	<title>Re:Remember when smartphone meant something?</title>
	<author>steve\_bryan</author>
	<datestamp>1261165020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can you see your wife's reflection in a mirror? Seriously, I am amazed that she has problems with the iPhone's touchscreen. Its performance is a large part of why the iPhone is so phenomenally successful. Maybe it is an issue of long fingernails.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you see your wife 's reflection in a mirror ?
Seriously , I am amazed that she has problems with the iPhone 's touchscreen .
Its performance is a large part of why the iPhone is so phenomenally successful .
Maybe it is an issue of long fingernails .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you see your wife's reflection in a mirror?
Seriously, I am amazed that she has problems with the iPhone's touchscreen.
Its performance is a large part of why the iPhone is so phenomenally successful.
Maybe it is an issue of long fingernails.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489886</id>
	<title>Re:Remember when smartphone meant something?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Am I the only one suspicious that they're using a rigged definition of "smartphone"? That is an awfully small list of phones for Japan. What is their criteria? How the hell could a Windows Mobile device even be number two? Beating that is like winning the Special Olympics.</p><p>Man, remember when people were pretending the iPhone was a smartphone before it had third party software, just to get it out of the feature phone category? Those were the days.</p></div><p>If you take even just a weekend trip to Japan and walk around in public, you will see a <b>TON</b> of iPhones. I just got back last week, having been there for 15 days. The iPhone is very, very popular there. This is anecdotal evidence and a rather shoddy sampling, but for real statistics... well, that's why we have TFA<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one suspicious that they 're using a rigged definition of " smartphone " ?
That is an awfully small list of phones for Japan .
What is their criteria ?
How the hell could a Windows Mobile device even be number two ?
Beating that is like winning the Special Olympics.Man , remember when people were pretending the iPhone was a smartphone before it had third party software , just to get it out of the feature phone category ?
Those were the days.If you take even just a weekend trip to Japan and walk around in public , you will see a TON of iPhones .
I just got back last week , having been there for 15 days .
The iPhone is very , very popular there .
This is anecdotal evidence and a rather shoddy sampling , but for real statistics... well , that 's why we have TFA ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one suspicious that they're using a rigged definition of "smartphone"?
That is an awfully small list of phones for Japan.
What is their criteria?
How the hell could a Windows Mobile device even be number two?
Beating that is like winning the Special Olympics.Man, remember when people were pretending the iPhone was a smartphone before it had third party software, just to get it out of the feature phone category?
Those were the days.If you take even just a weekend trip to Japan and walk around in public, you will see a TON of iPhones.
I just got back last week, having been there for 15 days.
The iPhone is very, very popular there.
This is anecdotal evidence and a rather shoddy sampling, but for real statistics... well, that's why we have TFA ;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489342</id>
	<title>sales? who cares!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261160340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>slashdot. News for nerds - stuff that matters<br>hmmm, I don't really see how iphone sales in Japan falls into either of those categories?</p><p>maybe it should be:<br>slashdot. News for sales people - stuff that is irrelevant to technology</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>slashdot .
News for nerds - stuff that mattershmmm , I do n't really see how iphone sales in Japan falls into either of those categories ? maybe it should be : slashdot .
News for sales people - stuff that is irrelevant to technology</tokentext>
<sentencetext>slashdot.
News for nerds - stuff that mattershmmm, I don't really see how iphone sales in Japan falls into either of those categories?maybe it should be:slashdot.
News for sales people - stuff that is irrelevant to technology</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495328</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>Swift2001</author>
	<datestamp>1261143540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because it's not true. People can't read reports. IN a SURVEY, a number of users, about 3,000, were asked what they thought of the iPhone. About 46\% liked it. It's not known if they owned it, or exactly what the question was. Brush up on your Japanese and explain it to us.</p><p>You wouldn't expect innumeracy from<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it 's not true .
People ca n't read reports .
IN a SURVEY , a number of users , about 3,000 , were asked what they thought of the iPhone .
About 46 \ % liked it .
It 's not known if they owned it , or exactly what the question was .
Brush up on your Japanese and explain it to us.You would n't expect innumeracy from / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it's not true.
People can't read reports.
IN a SURVEY, a number of users, about 3,000, were asked what they thought of the iPhone.
About 46\% liked it.
It's not known if they owned it, or exactly what the question was.
Brush up on your Japanese and explain it to us.You wouldn't expect innumeracy from /.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489192</id>
	<title>COLD TURKEY</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261159740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You might expect appleinsider.com to have a small bias.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You might expect appleinsider.com to have a small bias .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might expect appleinsider.com to have a small bias.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488872</id>
	<title>What about their bandwidth?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261158600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are their carriers getting crushed by heavy bandwidth users like AT&amp;T?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are their carriers getting crushed by heavy bandwidth users like AT&amp;T ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are their carriers getting crushed by heavy bandwidth users like AT&amp;T?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493522</id>
	<title>Re:Remember when smartphone meant something?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261132260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My anecdotal evidence agrees with the other AC.  I spent three weeks in Japan a couple months ago and saw hardly any iPhones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My anecdotal evidence agrees with the other AC .
I spent three weeks in Japan a couple months ago and saw hardly any iPhones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My anecdotal evidence agrees with the other AC.
I spent three weeks in Japan a couple months ago and saw hardly any iPhones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495458</id>
	<title>iPhone nabs 100\% of iPhone market!</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1261144980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ha - thanks for that, as I suspected.</p><p>So they are only doing well in an arbitrarily defined very small subset of the market, that's been defined to include them, and a small number of other phones, when actually most of the Japanese market are off buying other things to do the same thing.</p><p>Why not take it further, Apple fans? Just define the market to be the Iphone, and then you can say how Apple have 100\% market share!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ha - thanks for that , as I suspected.So they are only doing well in an arbitrarily defined very small subset of the market , that 's been defined to include them , and a small number of other phones , when actually most of the Japanese market are off buying other things to do the same thing.Why not take it further , Apple fans ?
Just define the market to be the Iphone , and then you can say how Apple have 100 \ % market share !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ha - thanks for that, as I suspected.So they are only doing well in an arbitrarily defined very small subset of the market, that's been defined to include them, and a small number of other phones, when actually most of the Japanese market are off buying other things to do the same thing.Why not take it further, Apple fans?
Just define the market to be the Iphone, and then you can say how Apple have 100\% market share!
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489420</id>
	<title>i wonder what the UI looks like...</title>
	<author>nimbius</author>
	<datestamp>1261160640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>as traditionally touch phones have suffered in asian countries where things like the stylus still reign supreme for complex alphabets.  Apple must be really dedicated to the market, or must see some serious competition against their stateside market.</htmltext>
<tokenext>as traditionally touch phones have suffered in asian countries where things like the stylus still reign supreme for complex alphabets .
Apple must be really dedicated to the market , or must see some serious competition against their stateside market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as traditionally touch phones have suffered in asian countries where things like the stylus still reign supreme for complex alphabets.
Apple must be really dedicated to the market, or must see some serious competition against their stateside market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495434</id>
	<title>Feature phones are not "fixed"</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1261144800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>and "feature" phones(still more or less inflexible, you get what the manufacturer and the carrier give you; but they give you all kinds of bells and whistles.</i></p><p>But all feature phones can run any app you like. They use Java rather than native code - but then I don't see why that's a bad thing, surely a common standard is good (and doesn't Android take the same approach, IIRC?) Meanwhile, look how locked down the Iphone is - you can only run apps that the manufacturer approve. So I don't think this is a good way to draw a distinction between smart and feature phones, especially if you want to claim that the Iphone is a smartphone...</p><p><i>What they missed, though, is that the smartphone is a fundamentally superior model, by virtue of being overwhelmingly more flexible and powerful than the fixed function phones, even if they happened to have a fairly large number of fixed functions.</i></p><p>What you're missing is that those feature phones still adopt this same model of an Internet-connected computer, and in no way are their functions fixed. My now ancient 2005 Motorola V980 that was my old function allowed me to install whatever apps I liked. My new Nokia 5800 is miles better yes - but there's no qualitative difference; it's rather the improvement of 4 years of advancement (and paying a higher price too). Just as a computer of today is is way better than one of 4 years ago, but no one would claim that they fall into different categories.</p><p>The big jump was between dumb phones, and feature/smart phones. It's <i>there</i> that you saw the leap from a phone that could only be a phone with maybe WAP, and fixed functions, to what was basically a handheld computer, allowing Internet access, applications, and running an OS. In the old days, we simply had dumb phones and smart phones. But since then, people had introduced this odd idea of "feature" phone, even though the feature phones are smart phones by the old definition. The only real difference is that "smart" phone seems to be reserved for phones that are high end - which isn't a hard definition, it tells us nothing about their features, and their capabilities change over time. The Iphone is only a smartphone by this definition because it's expensive.</p><p>And anyhow, even if we look at the devices labelled "smartphones", there were still plenty that also had the features that the Iphone missed. The criticisms were valid.</p><p><i>The iPhone was in the interesting position of being (arguably) the first "smartphone" well executed enough(and running on powerful enough hardware) to outcompete the far less flexible, but far more mature, "featurephone" segment for a large number of people.</i></p><p>What sort of ill-defined criterion is this? Do you have a citation? The Iphone is still a minority phone in the market, so what you say isn't true, it hasn't outcompeted feature phones on sales at all. If you mean to say it's selling better than earlier smartphones - well that's true of <i>all</i> smartphones - as time's gone on, their sales have increased. Nothing special about Apple.</p><p>And finally, please give me a definition of smartphone that includes the Iphone, but doesn't include these "feature" phones?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and " feature " phones ( still more or less inflexible , you get what the manufacturer and the carrier give you ; but they give you all kinds of bells and whistles.But all feature phones can run any app you like .
They use Java rather than native code - but then I do n't see why that 's a bad thing , surely a common standard is good ( and does n't Android take the same approach , IIRC ?
) Meanwhile , look how locked down the Iphone is - you can only run apps that the manufacturer approve .
So I do n't think this is a good way to draw a distinction between smart and feature phones , especially if you want to claim that the Iphone is a smartphone...What they missed , though , is that the smartphone is a fundamentally superior model , by virtue of being overwhelmingly more flexible and powerful than the fixed function phones , even if they happened to have a fairly large number of fixed functions.What you 're missing is that those feature phones still adopt this same model of an Internet-connected computer , and in no way are their functions fixed .
My now ancient 2005 Motorola V980 that was my old function allowed me to install whatever apps I liked .
My new Nokia 5800 is miles better yes - but there 's no qualitative difference ; it 's rather the improvement of 4 years of advancement ( and paying a higher price too ) .
Just as a computer of today is is way better than one of 4 years ago , but no one would claim that they fall into different categories.The big jump was between dumb phones , and feature/smart phones .
It 's there that you saw the leap from a phone that could only be a phone with maybe WAP , and fixed functions , to what was basically a handheld computer , allowing Internet access , applications , and running an OS .
In the old days , we simply had dumb phones and smart phones .
But since then , people had introduced this odd idea of " feature " phone , even though the feature phones are smart phones by the old definition .
The only real difference is that " smart " phone seems to be reserved for phones that are high end - which is n't a hard definition , it tells us nothing about their features , and their capabilities change over time .
The Iphone is only a smartphone by this definition because it 's expensive.And anyhow , even if we look at the devices labelled " smartphones " , there were still plenty that also had the features that the Iphone missed .
The criticisms were valid.The iPhone was in the interesting position of being ( arguably ) the first " smartphone " well executed enough ( and running on powerful enough hardware ) to outcompete the far less flexible , but far more mature , " featurephone " segment for a large number of people.What sort of ill-defined criterion is this ?
Do you have a citation ?
The Iphone is still a minority phone in the market , so what you say is n't true , it has n't outcompeted feature phones on sales at all .
If you mean to say it 's selling better than earlier smartphones - well that 's true of all smartphones - as time 's gone on , their sales have increased .
Nothing special about Apple.And finally , please give me a definition of smartphone that includes the Iphone , but does n't include these " feature " phones ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and "feature" phones(still more or less inflexible, you get what the manufacturer and the carrier give you; but they give you all kinds of bells and whistles.But all feature phones can run any app you like.
They use Java rather than native code - but then I don't see why that's a bad thing, surely a common standard is good (and doesn't Android take the same approach, IIRC?
) Meanwhile, look how locked down the Iphone is - you can only run apps that the manufacturer approve.
So I don't think this is a good way to draw a distinction between smart and feature phones, especially if you want to claim that the Iphone is a smartphone...What they missed, though, is that the smartphone is a fundamentally superior model, by virtue of being overwhelmingly more flexible and powerful than the fixed function phones, even if they happened to have a fairly large number of fixed functions.What you're missing is that those feature phones still adopt this same model of an Internet-connected computer, and in no way are their functions fixed.
My now ancient 2005 Motorola V980 that was my old function allowed me to install whatever apps I liked.
My new Nokia 5800 is miles better yes - but there's no qualitative difference; it's rather the improvement of 4 years of advancement (and paying a higher price too).
Just as a computer of today is is way better than one of 4 years ago, but no one would claim that they fall into different categories.The big jump was between dumb phones, and feature/smart phones.
It's there that you saw the leap from a phone that could only be a phone with maybe WAP, and fixed functions, to what was basically a handheld computer, allowing Internet access, applications, and running an OS.
In the old days, we simply had dumb phones and smart phones.
But since then, people had introduced this odd idea of "feature" phone, even though the feature phones are smart phones by the old definition.
The only real difference is that "smart" phone seems to be reserved for phones that are high end - which isn't a hard definition, it tells us nothing about their features, and their capabilities change over time.
The Iphone is only a smartphone by this definition because it's expensive.And anyhow, even if we look at the devices labelled "smartphones", there were still plenty that also had the features that the Iphone missed.
The criticisms were valid.The iPhone was in the interesting position of being (arguably) the first "smartphone" well executed enough(and running on powerful enough hardware) to outcompete the far less flexible, but far more mature, "featurephone" segment for a large number of people.What sort of ill-defined criterion is this?
Do you have a citation?
The Iphone is still a minority phone in the market, so what you say isn't true, it hasn't outcompeted feature phones on sales at all.
If you mean to say it's selling better than earlier smartphones - well that's true of all smartphones - as time's gone on, their sales have increased.
Nothing special about Apple.And finally, please give me a definition of smartphone that includes the Iphone, but doesn't include these "feature" phones?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489070</id>
	<title>Remember when smartphone meant something?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261159320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I the only one suspicious that they're using a rigged definition of "smartphone"? That is an awfully small list of phones for Japan. What is their criteria? How the hell could a Windows Mobile device even be number two? Beating that is like winning the Special Olympics.</p><p>Man, remember when people were pretending the iPhone was a smartphone before it had third party software, just to get it out of the feature phone category? Those were the days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one suspicious that they 're using a rigged definition of " smartphone " ?
That is an awfully small list of phones for Japan .
What is their criteria ?
How the hell could a Windows Mobile device even be number two ?
Beating that is like winning the Special Olympics.Man , remember when people were pretending the iPhone was a smartphone before it had third party software , just to get it out of the feature phone category ?
Those were the days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one suspicious that they're using a rigged definition of "smartphone"?
That is an awfully small list of phones for Japan.
What is their criteria?
How the hell could a Windows Mobile device even be number two?
Beating that is like winning the Special Olympics.Man, remember when people were pretending the iPhone was a smartphone before it had third party software, just to get it out of the feature phone category?
Those were the days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489598</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>pushing-robot</author>
	<datestamp>1261161240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Who invented the Time Machine?</p></div><p>I see what you did there.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who invented the Time Machine ? I see what you did there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who invented the Time Machine?I see what you did there.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488910</id>
	<title>Re:So why is XBox unpopular?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261158720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Japanese are completely racist. What is really funny therefore, is when weeabos go to live in Japan.</p><p>I don't know why Japanese culture, which is aggressive to outsiders, attracts outcasts so much. It's incongruous that they are attracted to a place where they become even bigger outcasts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Japanese are completely racist .
What is really funny therefore , is when weeabos go to live in Japan.I do n't know why Japanese culture , which is aggressive to outsiders , attracts outcasts so much .
It 's incongruous that they are attracted to a place where they become even bigger outcasts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Japanese are completely racist.
What is really funny therefore, is when weeabos go to live in Japan.I don't know why Japanese culture, which is aggressive to outsiders, attracts outcasts so much.
It's incongruous that they are attracted to a place where they become even bigger outcasts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491462</id>
	<title>Re:The summary lies! It's 24.6\% Not 46\%!</title>
	<author>jo\_ham</author>
	<datestamp>1261167660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Add together 24.6 and 21.5 (from the link you posted). I'll wait.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Add together 24.6 and 21.5 ( from the link you posted ) .
I 'll wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Add together 24.6 and 21.5 (from the link you posted).
I'll wait.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489098</id>
	<title>Broad definition</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1261159440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From what I have found, the definition of 'smartphone' in the report was so broad so as to include nearly anything more advance than a digital watch. In <a href="http://global.researchonasia.com/roa/userfiles/reportfiles/jsm.pdf" title="researchonasia.com">past</a> [researchonasia.com] research reports on the same subject, the definition was narrow:<blockquote><div><p>"...smartphone refers to a device that is equipped with Symbian UIQ, Nokia S60/S80, Windows Mobile, Palm, Linux OS and BlackBerry."</p></div></blockquote><p>Now the definition has apparently widened to include so much junk, that the iPhone seem nearly divine by comparision.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From what I have found , the definition of 'smartphone ' in the report was so broad so as to include nearly anything more advance than a digital watch .
In past [ researchonasia.com ] research reports on the same subject , the definition was narrow : " ...smartphone refers to a device that is equipped with Symbian UIQ , Nokia S60/S80 , Windows Mobile , Palm , Linux OS and BlackBerry .
" Now the definition has apparently widened to include so much junk , that the iPhone seem nearly divine by comparision .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what I have found, the definition of 'smartphone' in the report was so broad so as to include nearly anything more advance than a digital watch.
In past [researchonasia.com] research reports on the same subject, the definition was narrow:"...smartphone refers to a device that is equipped with Symbian UIQ, Nokia S60/S80, Windows Mobile, Palm, Linux OS and BlackBerry.
"Now the definition has apparently widened to include so much junk, that the iPhone seem nearly divine by comparision.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489074</id>
	<title>also more turkey than iPhone purchases at Xmas</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261159320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple is a strange beast. It's always seemed to aim at building a quality desktop for a restricted market which can afford it. It once lampooned Dell for being a company which makes profit on volume rather than quality. Even the click-wheel iPod remained steadfastly associated with its superior UI and superior price tag, and though it reached a mass market on "cool", it remained a winner on trademark usability and profit margin.</p><p>Then comes the iPhone, and with the iPhone comes a slurry of a very Microsoft form of press release, always discussing proportion of some market captured, number of apps downloaded, etc. The trait has trickled into their computer division, as they boast about "highest revenue in retail stores in the US in quarter X", or similar misleadingly over- or under-specified statistics. It's not that you can't make a huge profit, especially short-term, on running a business in this way. It's just not the Apple I knew from the '80s and early '90s.</p><p>The current favourite for Apple is "\% of smartphone market" - this one is an easy winner, because private consumers tend not to need/care much for the full detail of smartphone features, but they do buy what's cool. And there's never been a cool smartphone before the iPhone. What is more, the market of private consumers always exceeds the market of business users, so figures illustrating the iPhone's usage where it might actually be useful are drowned out by Joe Public wanting what's shiny. Finally, private conumsers without the desire for bling or the means to obtain it just go for non-smartphones.</p><p>To summarise, iPhones would be expected to win the "consumer smartphone" quantity battle because they are the <i>only</i> well-established consumer smartphone. As a result, they automatically win the "smartphone" quantity battle. But this doesn't necessarily mean they are the favoured smartphone in any particular group of existing users making an informed choice. There's a good reason why there was no "switch" advert for iPhone as there was for Mac.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple is a strange beast .
It 's always seemed to aim at building a quality desktop for a restricted market which can afford it .
It once lampooned Dell for being a company which makes profit on volume rather than quality .
Even the click-wheel iPod remained steadfastly associated with its superior UI and superior price tag , and though it reached a mass market on " cool " , it remained a winner on trademark usability and profit margin.Then comes the iPhone , and with the iPhone comes a slurry of a very Microsoft form of press release , always discussing proportion of some market captured , number of apps downloaded , etc .
The trait has trickled into their computer division , as they boast about " highest revenue in retail stores in the US in quarter X " , or similar misleadingly over- or under-specified statistics .
It 's not that you ca n't make a huge profit , especially short-term , on running a business in this way .
It 's just not the Apple I knew from the '80s and early '90s.The current favourite for Apple is " \ % of smartphone market " - this one is an easy winner , because private consumers tend not to need/care much for the full detail of smartphone features , but they do buy what 's cool .
And there 's never been a cool smartphone before the iPhone .
What is more , the market of private consumers always exceeds the market of business users , so figures illustrating the iPhone 's usage where it might actually be useful are drowned out by Joe Public wanting what 's shiny .
Finally , private conumsers without the desire for bling or the means to obtain it just go for non-smartphones.To summarise , iPhones would be expected to win the " consumer smartphone " quantity battle because they are the only well-established consumer smartphone .
As a result , they automatically win the " smartphone " quantity battle .
But this does n't necessarily mean they are the favoured smartphone in any particular group of existing users making an informed choice .
There 's a good reason why there was no " switch " advert for iPhone as there was for Mac .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple is a strange beast.
It's always seemed to aim at building a quality desktop for a restricted market which can afford it.
It once lampooned Dell for being a company which makes profit on volume rather than quality.
Even the click-wheel iPod remained steadfastly associated with its superior UI and superior price tag, and though it reached a mass market on "cool", it remained a winner on trademark usability and profit margin.Then comes the iPhone, and with the iPhone comes a slurry of a very Microsoft form of press release, always discussing proportion of some market captured, number of apps downloaded, etc.
The trait has trickled into their computer division, as they boast about "highest revenue in retail stores in the US in quarter X", or similar misleadingly over- or under-specified statistics.
It's not that you can't make a huge profit, especially short-term, on running a business in this way.
It's just not the Apple I knew from the '80s and early '90s.The current favourite for Apple is "\% of smartphone market" - this one is an easy winner, because private consumers tend not to need/care much for the full detail of smartphone features, but they do buy what's cool.
And there's never been a cool smartphone before the iPhone.
What is more, the market of private consumers always exceeds the market of business users, so figures illustrating the iPhone's usage where it might actually be useful are drowned out by Joe Public wanting what's shiny.
Finally, private conumsers without the desire for bling or the means to obtain it just go for non-smartphones.To summarise, iPhones would be expected to win the "consumer smartphone" quantity battle because they are the only well-established consumer smartphone.
As a result, they automatically win the "smartphone" quantity battle.
But this doesn't necessarily mean they are the favoured smartphone in any particular group of existing users making an informed choice.
There's a good reason why there was no "switch" advert for iPhone as there was for Mac.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489550</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the beef, er iPhones...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261161120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>... have evolved (like a Pikachu)...</i></p><p>Pikachu don't evolve; they just become more annoying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... have evolved ( like a Pikachu ) ...Pikachu do n't evolve ; they just become more annoying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... have evolved (like a Pikachu)...Pikachu don't evolve; they just become more annoying.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30496812</id>
	<title>Re:"Smartphone" is ill-defined</title>
	<author>Nazlfrag</author>
	<datestamp>1261161900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This report is not based on sales but a survey by a company called 'Impress R&amp;D'. I have no idea what their definition of smartphone is, but I think it might be self-reported by the surveyee whatever phone they were using judging by the random-looking nature of their list (ie. having the Nokia N82 &amp; E61 but no others).</p><p>What I do know is the sample size:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Summary of the Survey</p><p>PHS mobile phone user trends smartphones...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...Valid sample size: 3,004 valid responses</p></div><p>which is large but not huge. I wonder what the raw sales data actually is?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This report is not based on sales but a survey by a company called 'Impress R&amp;D' .
I have no idea what their definition of smartphone is , but I think it might be self-reported by the surveyee whatever phone they were using judging by the random-looking nature of their list ( ie .
having the Nokia N82 &amp; E61 but no others ) .What I do know is the sample size : Summary of the SurveyPHS mobile phone user trends smartphones... ...Valid sample size : 3,004 valid responseswhich is large but not huge .
I wonder what the raw sales data actually is ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This report is not based on sales but a survey by a company called 'Impress R&amp;D'.
I have no idea what their definition of smartphone is, but I think it might be self-reported by the surveyee whatever phone they were using judging by the random-looking nature of their list (ie.
having the Nokia N82 &amp; E61 but no others).What I do know is the sample size:Summary of the SurveyPHS mobile phone user trends smartphones... ...Valid sample size: 3,004 valid responseswhich is large but not huge.
I wonder what the raw sales data actually is?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493914</id>
	<title>The Japanese market is very different...</title>
	<author>srothroc</author>
	<datestamp>1261134300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The smartphone market here is absolutely miniscule. I'm not sure what anyone would gain from getting a smartphone in Japan since the normal Japanese cell phone already has more features than the standard American smartphone, excepting support for corporate policies and the like. The Japanese language works very well on a numeric keypad; there's absolutely no reason to use a keyboard, which is one of the draws of a smartphone. Japanese phones all have dedicated application stores/game sites as well, so that's not a factor either. Streaming video, youtube support, nicodouga support... all there.
<br>
<br>
What the iPhone does offer (in addition to a nice UI and experience) is a fashion factor, I think. It looks neat, the case is cool, it's relatively unique, and it's "branded." In some small way, it's like LV or any other brand; there are people who want it for the brand.
<br>
<br>
This is just anecdotal, but I personally know three Japanese people who have iPhones. They all got them because it looked neat and was essentially <b>free</b>. Of those three, one of them loves it, one of them has gone back to her original phone because the iPhone is much harder to write e-mail on, and the last, an American, uses it grudgingly because he can't go back (switched companies for the iPhone). Why does he dislike it? It's missing a lot of basic things that you can expect on a good cell phone: good dictionary support, kanji lookup, kaomoji/emoji support, and a useful texting interface.
<br>
<br>
There's no way I'd trade my phone for the iPhone, personally. The odd thing is, my phone (au's SH003) is apparently an attempt to steal some of the iPhone's touch thunder -- it's got a normal form factor but the screen is also touch-capable... not that I use it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The smartphone market here is absolutely miniscule .
I 'm not sure what anyone would gain from getting a smartphone in Japan since the normal Japanese cell phone already has more features than the standard American smartphone , excepting support for corporate policies and the like .
The Japanese language works very well on a numeric keypad ; there 's absolutely no reason to use a keyboard , which is one of the draws of a smartphone .
Japanese phones all have dedicated application stores/game sites as well , so that 's not a factor either .
Streaming video , youtube support , nicodouga support... all there .
What the iPhone does offer ( in addition to a nice UI and experience ) is a fashion factor , I think .
It looks neat , the case is cool , it 's relatively unique , and it 's " branded .
" In some small way , it 's like LV or any other brand ; there are people who want it for the brand .
This is just anecdotal , but I personally know three Japanese people who have iPhones .
They all got them because it looked neat and was essentially free .
Of those three , one of them loves it , one of them has gone back to her original phone because the iPhone is much harder to write e-mail on , and the last , an American , uses it grudgingly because he ca n't go back ( switched companies for the iPhone ) .
Why does he dislike it ?
It 's missing a lot of basic things that you can expect on a good cell phone : good dictionary support , kanji lookup , kaomoji/emoji support , and a useful texting interface .
There 's no way I 'd trade my phone for the iPhone , personally .
The odd thing is , my phone ( au 's SH003 ) is apparently an attempt to steal some of the iPhone 's touch thunder -- it 's got a normal form factor but the screen is also touch-capable... not that I use it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The smartphone market here is absolutely miniscule.
I'm not sure what anyone would gain from getting a smartphone in Japan since the normal Japanese cell phone already has more features than the standard American smartphone, excepting support for corporate policies and the like.
The Japanese language works very well on a numeric keypad; there's absolutely no reason to use a keyboard, which is one of the draws of a smartphone.
Japanese phones all have dedicated application stores/game sites as well, so that's not a factor either.
Streaming video, youtube support, nicodouga support... all there.
What the iPhone does offer (in addition to a nice UI and experience) is a fashion factor, I think.
It looks neat, the case is cool, it's relatively unique, and it's "branded.
" In some small way, it's like LV or any other brand; there are people who want it for the brand.
This is just anecdotal, but I personally know three Japanese people who have iPhones.
They all got them because it looked neat and was essentially free.
Of those three, one of them loves it, one of them has gone back to her original phone because the iPhone is much harder to write e-mail on, and the last, an American, uses it grudgingly because he can't go back (switched companies for the iPhone).
Why does he dislike it?
It's missing a lot of basic things that you can expect on a good cell phone: good dictionary support, kanji lookup, kaomoji/emoji support, and a useful texting interface.
There's no way I'd trade my phone for the iPhone, personally.
The odd thing is, my phone (au's SH003) is apparently an attempt to steal some of the iPhone's touch thunder -- it's got a normal form factor but the screen is also touch-capable... not that I use it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489490</id>
	<title>What is a "smartphone"?</title>
	<author>SwedishPenguin</author>
	<datestamp>1261160880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What exactly is the definition of a "smartphone"? Is it being able to install third party applications? In that case my previous phone from Sony Ericsson (released almost 4 years ago) and most phones sold are smart phones. Is it a touch interface? In that case there are several smartphones that run neither of the Operating Systems that a smart phone must have according to the article.<br>Before you can come up with a good impartial definition of the word "smartphone" you cannot know how large the market share of a specific smartphone is, or even if it qualifies as a smartphone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What exactly is the definition of a " smartphone " ?
Is it being able to install third party applications ?
In that case my previous phone from Sony Ericsson ( released almost 4 years ago ) and most phones sold are smart phones .
Is it a touch interface ?
In that case there are several smartphones that run neither of the Operating Systems that a smart phone must have according to the article.Before you can come up with a good impartial definition of the word " smartphone " you can not know how large the market share of a specific smartphone is , or even if it qualifies as a smartphone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What exactly is the definition of a "smartphone"?
Is it being able to install third party applications?
In that case my previous phone from Sony Ericsson (released almost 4 years ago) and most phones sold are smart phones.
Is it a touch interface?
In that case there are several smartphones that run neither of the Operating Systems that a smart phone must have according to the article.Before you can come up with a good impartial definition of the word "smartphone" you cannot know how large the market share of a specific smartphone is, or even if it qualifies as a smartphone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490030</id>
	<title>Better Article at Engadget Mobile</title>
	<author>teko\_teko</author>
	<datestamp>1261162560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Engadget Mobile provides a better perspective:</p><p><b>iPhone nabs 46 pecent of Japanese smartphone market, the tiny Japanese smartphone market</b></p><p>So you read a headline like "iPhone grabs 46 percent of the Japanese smartphone market" and the first thing you're likely to think is, "wow, Apple is really doing well for itself." Well, it is and it isn't. While it has made some considerable gains in the smartphone market at the expense of phones like Sharp's W-ZERO3 and the Willcom 03, it still hasn't gained nearly the same total mindshare or market share that it has over here. That's because "smartphones" as we know them are still a relatively small market in Japan, where carriers' lineups consist of a whole range of offerings including everything from mobile TV-equipped phones to true camera phones to perfume holders.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/iphone-nabs-46-pecent-of-japanese-smartphone-market-the-tiny-ja/" title="engadget.com">Source</a> [engadget.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Engadget Mobile provides a better perspective : iPhone nabs 46 pecent of Japanese smartphone market , the tiny Japanese smartphone marketSo you read a headline like " iPhone grabs 46 percent of the Japanese smartphone market " and the first thing you 're likely to think is , " wow , Apple is really doing well for itself .
" Well , it is and it is n't .
While it has made some considerable gains in the smartphone market at the expense of phones like Sharp 's W-ZERO3 and the Willcom 03 , it still has n't gained nearly the same total mindshare or market share that it has over here .
That 's because " smartphones " as we know them are still a relatively small market in Japan , where carriers ' lineups consist of a whole range of offerings including everything from mobile TV-equipped phones to true camera phones to perfume holders.Source [ engadget.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Engadget Mobile provides a better perspective:iPhone nabs 46 pecent of Japanese smartphone market, the tiny Japanese smartphone marketSo you read a headline like "iPhone grabs 46 percent of the Japanese smartphone market" and the first thing you're likely to think is, "wow, Apple is really doing well for itself.
" Well, it is and it isn't.
While it has made some considerable gains in the smartphone market at the expense of phones like Sharp's W-ZERO3 and the Willcom 03, it still hasn't gained nearly the same total mindshare or market share that it has over here.
That's because "smartphones" as we know them are still a relatively small market in Japan, where carriers' lineups consist of a whole range of offerings including everything from mobile TV-equipped phones to true camera phones to perfume holders.Source [engadget.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490076</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the beef, er iPhones...</title>
	<author>idolcrash</author>
	<datestamp>1261162680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem is, I believe (from other sites carrying this story) that the smartphones altogether, have only a 22.7\% marketshare. This includes the iPhone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is , I believe ( from other sites carrying this story ) that the smartphones altogether , have only a 22.7 \ % marketshare .
This includes the iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is, I believe (from other sites carrying this story) that the smartphones altogether, have only a 22.7\% marketshare.
This includes the iPhone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491792</id>
	<title>What's a "smart phone"???</title>
	<author>witchman</author>
	<datestamp>1261168920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Depends on what you call a "smart phone."</p><p>Japanese phones have been way ahead of American phones in terms of advanced features for years.  They regularly make purchases right from their phone using "smart wallet" functions, something even the iPhone lacks.</p><p>So I take this news with a HUGE grain of salt.</p><p>I'm not doubting that the iPhone is popular in Japan, but when you consider that almost all phones in Japan could reasonably be called "Smart Phones" then I don't think that the iPhone represents 40\% of that market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends on what you call a " smart phone .
" Japanese phones have been way ahead of American phones in terms of advanced features for years .
They regularly make purchases right from their phone using " smart wallet " functions , something even the iPhone lacks.So I take this news with a HUGE grain of salt.I 'm not doubting that the iPhone is popular in Japan , but when you consider that almost all phones in Japan could reasonably be called " Smart Phones " then I do n't think that the iPhone represents 40 \ % of that market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends on what you call a "smart phone.
"Japanese phones have been way ahead of American phones in terms of advanced features for years.
They regularly make purchases right from their phone using "smart wallet" functions, something even the iPhone lacks.So I take this news with a HUGE grain of salt.I'm not doubting that the iPhone is popular in Japan, but when you consider that almost all phones in Japan could reasonably be called "Smart Phones" then I don't think that the iPhone represents 40\% of that market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490412</id>
	<title>Re:The summary lies! It's 24.6\% Not 46\%!</title>
	<author>cyfer2000</author>
	<datestamp>1261163700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the link you provided, the iPhone 3G has a market share of 24.6 and iPhone 3GS has a market share of 21.5\%, together the number is 46.1\%. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the link you provided , the iPhone 3G has a market share of 24.6 and iPhone 3GS has a market share of 21.5 \ % , together the number is 46.1 \ % .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the link you provided, the iPhone 3G has a market share of 24.6 and iPhone 3GS has a market share of 21.5\%, together the number is 46.1\%. </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492846</id>
	<title>How you like them apples, Ibuka-san?</title>
	<author>AlexLibman</author>
	<datestamp>1261129500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>USA!  USA!  Woooo!</p><p>And we didn't even need a "department of industry" to do it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>USA !
USA ! Woooo ! And we did n't even need a " department of industry " to do it .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>USA!
USA!  Woooo!And we didn't even need a "department of industry" to do it.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848</id>
	<title>Where's the beef, er iPhones...</title>
	<author>jedidiah</author>
	<datestamp>1261158480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You gotta wonder what those numbers actually mean. Are we just talking about being a big fish in a miniscule pond? My own personal observations don't correspond to the idea that a "Apple has a 46\% share". They certainly don't seem terribly visible for "such a large share".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You got ta wonder what those numbers actually mean .
Are we just talking about being a big fish in a miniscule pond ?
My own personal observations do n't correspond to the idea that a " Apple has a 46 \ % share " .
They certainly do n't seem terribly visible for " such a large share " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You gotta wonder what those numbers actually mean.
Are we just talking about being a big fish in a miniscule pond?
My own personal observations don't correspond to the idea that a "Apple has a 46\% share".
They certainly don't seem terribly visible for "such a large share".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493872</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>Dirtside</author>
	<datestamp>1261134120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>spartan calendar</p></div></blockquote><p>"The 20th? Sorry, no good, on the 20th I'm having dinner IN HELL!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>spartan calendar " The 20th ?
Sorry , no good , on the 20th I 'm having dinner IN HELL !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>spartan calendar"The 20th?
Sorry, no good, on the 20th I'm having dinner IN HELL!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490866</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>Lulfas</author>
	<datestamp>1261165380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The "smartphone" market is an extremely small part of the Japanese phone market because of all those advances.  The smart phone market is separate from the camera-phone market (with good cameras), the tv-phone market, the perfume holder market, etc.  The market is very segmented, unlike in America.  I don't remember the link, but someone on Engadget this morning had a chart of the actual total cell phone marketshare.  Apple got lumped in with all the other nobodies in the 22.2\% share of "Other".</htmltext>
<tokenext>The " smartphone " market is an extremely small part of the Japanese phone market because of all those advances .
The smart phone market is separate from the camera-phone market ( with good cameras ) , the tv-phone market , the perfume holder market , etc .
The market is very segmented , unlike in America .
I do n't remember the link , but someone on Engadget this morning had a chart of the actual total cell phone marketshare .
Apple got lumped in with all the other nobodies in the 22.2 \ % share of " Other " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "smartphone" market is an extremely small part of the Japanese phone market because of all those advances.
The smart phone market is separate from the camera-phone market (with good cameras), the tv-phone market, the perfume holder market, etc.
The market is very segmented, unlike in America.
I don't remember the link, but someone on Engadget this morning had a chart of the actual total cell phone marketshare.
Apple got lumped in with all the other nobodies in the 22.2\% share of "Other".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489190</id>
	<title>bullshit...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261159740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>*troll mods coming soon*
<br> <br>
The way I see it, the definition of smart phone used in the article is to make sure iphone comes out on top. It is back when engadget suddenly declared '99\% of smartphone traffic on our mobile-specific website is from iphone' - the reason was that blackberry was identifying itself as full browser while engadget only targetted mobile specific browser and did the calculation.
<br> <br>This number means fuck-all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>* troll mods coming soon * The way I see it , the definition of smart phone used in the article is to make sure iphone comes out on top .
It is back when engadget suddenly declared '99 \ % of smartphone traffic on our mobile-specific website is from iphone ' - the reason was that blackberry was identifying itself as full browser while engadget only targetted mobile specific browser and did the calculation .
This number means fuck-all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*troll mods coming soon*
 
The way I see it, the definition of smart phone used in the article is to make sure iphone comes out on top.
It is back when engadget suddenly declared '99\% of smartphone traffic on our mobile-specific website is from iphone' - the reason was that blackberry was identifying itself as full browser while engadget only targetted mobile specific browser and did the calculation.
This number means fuck-all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488816</id>
	<title>So why is XBox unpopular?</title>
	<author>OrangeTide</author>
	<datestamp>1261158300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait they like iPhone? How can this be? But I thought XBox is unpopular in Japanese because they hate foreign products. I guess all this time it was because XBox sucks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait they like iPhone ?
How can this be ?
But I thought XBox is unpopular in Japanese because they hate foreign products .
I guess all this time it was because XBox sucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait they like iPhone?
How can this be?
But I thought XBox is unpopular in Japanese because they hate foreign products.
I guess all this time it was because XBox sucks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30496606</id>
	<title>Re:i wonder what the UI looks like...</title>
	<author>grouchomarxist</author>
	<datestamp>1261158900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm in Japan and I've never seen anyone use a stylus with a cell phone. The most popular method of entering Japanese text is by using the numeric keypad. Even for Japanese iPhone users they often use the iPhone's version of numeric keypad entry to enter text. Some people can write messages fairly rapidly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm in Japan and I 've never seen anyone use a stylus with a cell phone .
The most popular method of entering Japanese text is by using the numeric keypad .
Even for Japanese iPhone users they often use the iPhone 's version of numeric keypad entry to enter text .
Some people can write messages fairly rapidly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm in Japan and I've never seen anyone use a stylus with a cell phone.
The most popular method of entering Japanese text is by using the numeric keypad.
Even for Japanese iPhone users they often use the iPhone's version of numeric keypad entry to enter text.
Some people can write messages fairly rapidly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493044</id>
	<title>Re:also more turkey than iPhone purchases at Xmas</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261130280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it has to do with the market. In the computer market, Apple is marketing directly to the end-users. Same with iPods. While you may think that those iPhone press releases are geared to the users, in fact I suspect their real target is the phone companies, who act as gatekeepers to their networks. I believe that Apple push the notion of marketshare on iPhones so that it's inescapable and builds demand in the carriers, because without carrier support, Apple won't really be able to have access to their usual high-end clientele. So it's a case of "the medium is the message", as far as I can tell.</p><p>  Personally, while I like the design of the iPhone, all I really want is an iPod touch with voice cellular capability. I have no need for 3G data until data plans get more reasonable, which won't happen until a number of years have gone by (5+?) and carriers realize that they're missing most of the market with their pricing. I'm waiting for a decent slim Android 2.0 device to be made available up here in Canada. I'm hoping the Samsung i6500 works out well and a carrier up here picks it up. In which case I'll buy it outright unlocked and use only voice svcs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it has to do with the market .
In the computer market , Apple is marketing directly to the end-users .
Same with iPods .
While you may think that those iPhone press releases are geared to the users , in fact I suspect their real target is the phone companies , who act as gatekeepers to their networks .
I believe that Apple push the notion of marketshare on iPhones so that it 's inescapable and builds demand in the carriers , because without carrier support , Apple wo n't really be able to have access to their usual high-end clientele .
So it 's a case of " the medium is the message " , as far as I can tell .
Personally , while I like the design of the iPhone , all I really want is an iPod touch with voice cellular capability .
I have no need for 3G data until data plans get more reasonable , which wo n't happen until a number of years have gone by ( 5 + ?
) and carriers realize that they 're missing most of the market with their pricing .
I 'm waiting for a decent slim Android 2.0 device to be made available up here in Canada .
I 'm hoping the Samsung i6500 works out well and a carrier up here picks it up .
In which case I 'll buy it outright unlocked and use only voice svcs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it has to do with the market.
In the computer market, Apple is marketing directly to the end-users.
Same with iPods.
While you may think that those iPhone press releases are geared to the users, in fact I suspect their real target is the phone companies, who act as gatekeepers to their networks.
I believe that Apple push the notion of marketshare on iPhones so that it's inescapable and builds demand in the carriers, because without carrier support, Apple won't really be able to have access to their usual high-end clientele.
So it's a case of "the medium is the message", as far as I can tell.
Personally, while I like the design of the iPhone, all I really want is an iPod touch with voice cellular capability.
I have no need for 3G data until data plans get more reasonable, which won't happen until a number of years have gone by (5+?
) and carriers realize that they're missing most of the market with their pricing.
I'm waiting for a decent slim Android 2.0 device to be made available up here in Canada.
I'm hoping the Samsung i6500 works out well and a carrier up here picks it up.
In which case I'll buy it outright unlocked and use only voice svcs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490156</id>
	<title>Bogus survey?</title>
	<author>burnin1965</author>
	<datestamp>1261162920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As with the AdMob survey numbers based on web browsing hits this survey is suspicious.</p><p>Looking through my web server logs the only smartphone browser hits I get are from iPhone clients...</p><blockquote><div><p>"Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/1A543a Safari/419.3"</p></div></blockquote><p>But considering the iPhone has only 15\% or so actual market share I found it curious that they seem to hold such a large share of web browsing as evidenced on my own server, so I looked closer at where these clients originated using a whois of the IP addresses of some clients, 72.44.57.255, 174.129.64.115, 174.129.143.218, 67.202.4.57, etc...</p><blockquote><div><p>[Querying whois.arin.net]<br>[whois.arin.net]</p><p>OrgName:    Amazon.com, Inc.<br>OrgID:      AMAZO-4<br>Address:    Amazon Web Services, Elastic Compute Cloud, EC2<br>Address:    1200 12th Avenue South<br>City:       Seattle<br>StateProv:  WA<br>PostalCode: 98144<br>Country:    US</p></div></blockquote><p>Uh, WTF! Every single iPhone hit is from the Amazon cloud computing cluster.</p><p>Amazon runs their EC2 cloud computing cluster off iPhones? Something really fishy is going on here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As with the AdMob survey numbers based on web browsing hits this survey is suspicious.Looking through my web server logs the only smartphone browser hits I get are from iPhone clients... " Mozilla/5.0 ( iPhone ; U ; CPU like Mac OS X ; en ) AppleWebKit/420 + ( KHTML , like Gecko ) Version/3.0 Mobile/1A543a Safari/419.3 " But considering the iPhone has only 15 \ % or so actual market share I found it curious that they seem to hold such a large share of web browsing as evidenced on my own server , so I looked closer at where these clients originated using a whois of the IP addresses of some clients , 72.44.57.255 , 174.129.64.115 , 174.129.143.218 , 67.202.4.57 , etc... [ Querying whois.arin.net ] [ whois.arin.net ] OrgName : Amazon.com , Inc.OrgID : AMAZO-4Address : Amazon Web Services , Elastic Compute Cloud , EC2Address : 1200 12th Avenue SouthCity : SeattleStateProv : WAPostalCode : 98144Country : USUh , WTF !
Every single iPhone hit is from the Amazon cloud computing cluster.Amazon runs their EC2 cloud computing cluster off iPhones ?
Something really fishy is going on here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As with the AdMob survey numbers based on web browsing hits this survey is suspicious.Looking through my web server logs the only smartphone browser hits I get are from iPhone clients..."Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/1A543a Safari/419.3"But considering the iPhone has only 15\% or so actual market share I found it curious that they seem to hold such a large share of web browsing as evidenced on my own server, so I looked closer at where these clients originated using a whois of the IP addresses of some clients, 72.44.57.255, 174.129.64.115, 174.129.143.218, 67.202.4.57, etc...[Querying whois.arin.net][whois.arin.net]OrgName:    Amazon.com, Inc.OrgID:      AMAZO-4Address:    Amazon Web Services, Elastic Compute Cloud, EC2Address:    1200 12th Avenue SouthCity:       SeattleStateProv:  WAPostalCode: 98144Country:    USUh, WTF!
Every single iPhone hit is from the Amazon cloud computing cluster.Amazon runs their EC2 cloud computing cluster off iPhones?
Something really fishy is going on here.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497704</id>
	<title>Re:Another out of context hype article</title>
	<author>trawg</author>
	<datestamp>1261224120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep, I remember being in Japan and seeing phones that did all that and being amazed at how far behind the rest of the world was.</p><p>This was when I was there at the start of 2006.</p><p>Sad face.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , I remember being in Japan and seeing phones that did all that and being amazed at how far behind the rest of the world was.This was when I was there at the start of 2006.Sad face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, I remember being in Japan and seeing phones that did all that and being amazed at how far behind the rest of the world was.This was when I was there at the start of 2006.Sad face.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493404</id>
	<title>Re:I call bullshit, until I see a second source...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261131780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey you <em>stupid</em> little <em>retard</em> dogmanic Apple fanboy moderators: <strong>Read</strong> my fuckin' comment! Read <em>all</em> of it!</p><p>I&rsquo;m starting a normal discussion here, and then you come in, wearing no pants, drooling like a retard, moderating everything troll that the little holy war monkey boy does not like, and fuck it all up!</p><p>Be happy that we&rsquo;re not in RL here, or I&rsquo;d rip your fuckin&rsquo; face apart and feed it to my dogs!</p><p>P.S.: Now THAT is a Flame! ^^ See. Take that as an example. Maybe you&rsquo;ll learn something after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey you stupid little retard dogmanic Apple fanboy moderators : Read my fuckin ' comment !
Read all of it ! I    m starting a normal discussion here , and then you come in , wearing no pants , drooling like a retard , moderating everything troll that the little holy war monkey boy does not like , and fuck it all up ! Be happy that we    re not in RL here , or I    d rip your fuckin    face apart and feed it to my dogs ! P.S .
: Now THAT is a Flame !
^ ^ See .
Take that as an example .
Maybe you    ll learn something after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey you stupid little retard dogmanic Apple fanboy moderators: Read my fuckin' comment!
Read all of it!I’m starting a normal discussion here, and then you come in, wearing no pants, drooling like a retard, moderating everything troll that the little holy war monkey boy does not like, and fuck it all up!Be happy that we’re not in RL here, or I’d rip your fuckin’ face apart and feed it to my dogs!P.S.
: Now THAT is a Flame!
^^ See.
Take that as an example.
Maybe you’ll learn something after all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489014</id>
	<title>Makes you wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261159140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>how they can see all of their iPhone apps with those squinty Chink eyes they have. freakin' slopes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how they can see all of their iPhone apps with those squinty Chink eyes they have .
freakin ' slopes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how they can see all of their iPhone apps with those squinty Chink eyes they have.
freakin' slopes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490668</id>
	<title>'smartphone'?</title>
	<author>hao3</author>
	<datestamp>1261164600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can someone please define 'smartphone. Until then, such statistics mean little. The only meaningful ones are shares of the entire phone market. Which for Q4 2009 is about 2.5\% globally. Probably higher in the US, but I couldn't find US-only (or North America) figures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone please define 'smartphone .
Until then , such statistics mean little .
The only meaningful ones are shares of the entire phone market .
Which for Q4 2009 is about 2.5 \ % globally .
Probably higher in the US , but I could n't find US-only ( or North America ) figures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone please define 'smartphone.
Until then, such statistics mean little.
The only meaningful ones are shares of the entire phone market.
Which for Q4 2009 is about 2.5\% globally.
Probably higher in the US, but I couldn't find US-only (or North America) figures.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489714</id>
	<title>Re:Great news!</title>
	<author>Kagura</author>
	<datestamp>1261161600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is your on-scene reporter who just got back from Japan this month and this last August:  There really are a LOT of iPhones here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is your on-scene reporter who just got back from Japan this month and this last August : There really are a LOT of iPhones here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is your on-scene reporter who just got back from Japan this month and this last August:  There really are a LOT of iPhones here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491428</id>
	<title>Re:Nice try, but no.</title>
	<author>jo\_ham</author>
	<datestamp>1261167480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So why is this "but no" - a 46\% share of the market that your product is targeting is excellent, regardless of how small that market segment is. The idea is not to be the very best or you've failed, it's to be profitable and produce a product people want to buy. Apple is very good at that, and is proving that with the emerging market for smartphones in Japan, where phone culture is vastly different to the US and Europe.</p><p>It may be a very small share, but it is the lion's share of a small market - by any stretch that is successful, assuming that you are actually making decent profits on the sales (ie, that they don't have a user base of a hundred, after spending thousands on TV adverts and shipping and distribution etc).</p><p>It's a similar model to how they treat their computer hardware - a small (but growing) user base that doesn't seek to be number 1, just continues to make money hand over fist (love it or hate it).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So why is this " but no " - a 46 \ % share of the market that your product is targeting is excellent , regardless of how small that market segment is .
The idea is not to be the very best or you 've failed , it 's to be profitable and produce a product people want to buy .
Apple is very good at that , and is proving that with the emerging market for smartphones in Japan , where phone culture is vastly different to the US and Europe.It may be a very small share , but it is the lion 's share of a small market - by any stretch that is successful , assuming that you are actually making decent profits on the sales ( ie , that they do n't have a user base of a hundred , after spending thousands on TV adverts and shipping and distribution etc ) .It 's a similar model to how they treat their computer hardware - a small ( but growing ) user base that does n't seek to be number 1 , just continues to make money hand over fist ( love it or hate it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So why is this "but no" - a 46\% share of the market that your product is targeting is excellent, regardless of how small that market segment is.
The idea is not to be the very best or you've failed, it's to be profitable and produce a product people want to buy.
Apple is very good at that, and is proving that with the emerging market for smartphones in Japan, where phone culture is vastly different to the US and Europe.It may be a very small share, but it is the lion's share of a small market - by any stretch that is successful, assuming that you are actually making decent profits on the sales (ie, that they don't have a user base of a hundred, after spending thousands on TV adverts and shipping and distribution etc).It's a similar model to how they treat their computer hardware - a small (but growing) user base that doesn't seek to be number 1, just continues to make money hand over fist (love it or hate it).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30494916</id>
	<title>Only until this one hits markets</title>
	<author>xenocide2</author>
	<datestamp>1261140060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2009/05/24/eden-of-the-east-phone/" title="sankakucomplex.com">Nobless Oblige</a> [sankakucomplex.com]. I mean can your iPhone order missile strikes?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobless Oblige [ sankakucomplex.com ] .
I mean can your iPhone order missile strikes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobless Oblige [sankakucomplex.com].
I mean can your iPhone order missile strikes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30498290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30503608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30494172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30496822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30494900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488910
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30496624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30496812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30496606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489598
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30503670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30499064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30541432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30496630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30494680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30494880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30541384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1626237_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30494172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30503670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30494880
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489014
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489238
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30494680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488942
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492210
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489494
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488908
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30496606
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30503608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489190
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489266
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30541384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490310
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488784
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493914
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489588
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490770
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490180
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489886
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489360
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489170
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488940
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30488866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489152
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489714
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490030
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492100
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497726
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30496630
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30541432
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495458
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30496822
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30499064
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489956
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495328
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490866
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489598
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491178
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489864
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30494900
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493872
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495434
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492466
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489816
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495694
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495378
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497718
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30498290
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30496812
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30492742
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490574
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493178
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489490
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30496624
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489436
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30491792
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489046
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30495320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30497704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30490668
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1626237.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30489710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1626237.30493404
</commentlist>
</conversation>
