<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_18_1531216</id>
	<title>EU Demands Canada Rework Its Copyright, Patent Law</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1261152000000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"The draft intellectual property text of the <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/4627/125/">EU - Canada Trade Agreement has leaked</a>, with news that the EU is demanding that Canada fundamentally alter copyright, patent, and trademark law. The laundry list of demands includes copyright term extension, WIPO ratification, DMCA-style legislation, resale rights, new enforcement provisions, and following patent, trademark, and design law treaties. The net result is that when combined with the ACTA requirements, Canadian copyright law may cease to be Canadian."</i> Reader TheTurtlesMoves stresses the <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/12/eu-pushes-canada-to-drop-first-sale-principle-for-art.ars">"first sale doctrine" aspect</a> of the Canada - EU negotiations. Once an artist sells a creative work, should she get a cut of any future resales of that same work? The EU says yes at least for some types of works, and it wants Canada to see things its way. <i>"Europe's Directive 2001/84/EC says that the right covers only 'works of graphic or plastic art such as pictures, collages, paintings, drawings, engravings, prints, lithographs, sculptures, tapestries, ceramics, glassware and photographs, provided they are made by the artist himself or are copies considered to be original works of art.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " The draft intellectual property text of the EU - Canada Trade Agreement has leaked , with news that the EU is demanding that Canada fundamentally alter copyright , patent , and trademark law .
The laundry list of demands includes copyright term extension , WIPO ratification , DMCA-style legislation , resale rights , new enforcement provisions , and following patent , trademark , and design law treaties .
The net result is that when combined with the ACTA requirements , Canadian copyright law may cease to be Canadian .
" Reader TheTurtlesMoves stresses the " first sale doctrine " aspect of the Canada - EU negotiations .
Once an artist sells a creative work , should she get a cut of any future resales of that same work ?
The EU says yes at least for some types of works , and it wants Canada to see things its way .
" Europe 's Directive 2001/84/EC says that the right covers only 'works of graphic or plastic art such as pictures , collages , paintings , drawings , engravings , prints , lithographs , sculptures , tapestries , ceramics , glassware and photographs , provided they are made by the artist himself or are copies considered to be original works of art .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "The draft intellectual property text of the EU - Canada Trade Agreement has leaked, with news that the EU is demanding that Canada fundamentally alter copyright, patent, and trademark law.
The laundry list of demands includes copyright term extension, WIPO ratification, DMCA-style legislation, resale rights, new enforcement provisions, and following patent, trademark, and design law treaties.
The net result is that when combined with the ACTA requirements, Canadian copyright law may cease to be Canadian.
" Reader TheTurtlesMoves stresses the "first sale doctrine" aspect of the Canada - EU negotiations.
Once an artist sells a creative work, should she get a cut of any future resales of that same work?
The EU says yes at least for some types of works, and it wants Canada to see things its way.
"Europe's Directive 2001/84/EC says that the right covers only 'works of graphic or plastic art such as pictures, collages, paintings, drawings, engravings, prints, lithographs, sculptures, tapestries, ceramics, glassware and photographs, provided they are made by the artist himself or are copies considered to be original works of art.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488820</id>
	<title>Who's going to keep track of these sales?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261158360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who in the frick will keep track of all these transactions?!</p><p>I'm imagining yet another collection society which will collect transaction fees for each resale. Of course the society will keep a portion for itself, to cover costs and salaries, right?</p><p>A <i>mandatory</i> system will need to be setup for the reselling of art pieces.  So it will be a felony for any Canadian to sell or buy art outside the system.</p><p>Small time artists will not be paid out what is collected by the society, in the same way that small time song writers are not paid. They will be told that in order to collect they must become famous artists first. Defeating the entire purpose of the law in the first place: to protect small time artists.</p><p>And of course it will be only a matter of time before schools, hotels, and individuals will be sued by the collection society for displaying art without paying.  The burden will be on the accused to prove that they are in fact paid up. Police powers will have to be given to the society so it can send agents into homes and businesses to ensure compliance. A telephone hotline will be setup so that employees can rat out their bosses for hanging art without an approved society license.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who in the frick will keep track of all these transactions ?
! I 'm imagining yet another collection society which will collect transaction fees for each resale .
Of course the society will keep a portion for itself , to cover costs and salaries , right ? A mandatory system will need to be setup for the reselling of art pieces .
So it will be a felony for any Canadian to sell or buy art outside the system.Small time artists will not be paid out what is collected by the society , in the same way that small time song writers are not paid .
They will be told that in order to collect they must become famous artists first .
Defeating the entire purpose of the law in the first place : to protect small time artists.And of course it will be only a matter of time before schools , hotels , and individuals will be sued by the collection society for displaying art without paying .
The burden will be on the accused to prove that they are in fact paid up .
Police powers will have to be given to the society so it can send agents into homes and businesses to ensure compliance .
A telephone hotline will be setup so that employees can rat out their bosses for hanging art without an approved society license .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who in the frick will keep track of all these transactions?
!I'm imagining yet another collection society which will collect transaction fees for each resale.
Of course the society will keep a portion for itself, to cover costs and salaries, right?A mandatory system will need to be setup for the reselling of art pieces.
So it will be a felony for any Canadian to sell or buy art outside the system.Small time artists will not be paid out what is collected by the society, in the same way that small time song writers are not paid.
They will be told that in order to collect they must become famous artists first.
Defeating the entire purpose of the law in the first place: to protect small time artists.And of course it will be only a matter of time before schools, hotels, and individuals will be sued by the collection society for displaying art without paying.
The burden will be on the accused to prove that they are in fact paid up.
Police powers will have to be given to the society so it can send agents into homes and businesses to ensure compliance.
A telephone hotline will be setup so that employees can rat out their bosses for hanging art without an approved society license.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489092</id>
	<title>Re:Disgusting...</title>
	<author>omega6</author>
	<datestamp>1261159440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>IF I were you, I double check your sources...

Reuters on the last federal election: "Canada voter turnout lowest on record" with a turn out of 59.1.  <a href="http://ca.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idCATRE49E9BO20081015" title="reuters.com" rel="nofollow">http://ca.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idCATRE49E9BO20081015</a> [reuters.com]

You may be referring a city of some sort, but in Canada, copyright law is not a city responsibility.</htmltext>
<tokenext>IF I were you , I double check your sources.. . Reuters on the last federal election : " Canada voter turnout lowest on record " with a turn out of 59.1. http : //ca.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idCATRE49E9BO20081015 [ reuters.com ] You may be referring a city of some sort , but in Canada , copyright law is not a city responsibility .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IF I were you, I double check your sources...

Reuters on the last federal election: "Canada voter turnout lowest on record" with a turn out of 59.1.  http://ca.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idCATRE49E9BO20081015 [reuters.com]

You may be referring a city of some sort, but in Canada, copyright law is not a city responsibility.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490428</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1261163760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If you take an individual country the size of Sweden or Canada</p></div></blockquote><p>WTF are you on about?  That's quite a wide range you're tarring with one brush.  Sweden is relatively small.  Canada is totally enormous.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you take an individual country the size of Sweden or CanadaWTF are you on about ?
That 's quite a wide range you 're tarring with one brush .
Sweden is relatively small .
Canada is totally enormous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you take an individual country the size of Sweden or CanadaWTF are you on about?
That's quite a wide range you're tarring with one brush.
Sweden is relatively small.
Canada is totally enormous.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488738</id>
	<title>Re:I'm surprised</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1261158060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'm European myself and I didn't even know we had DMCA style legislation here</p></div></blockquote><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European\_Copyright\_Directive" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European\_Copyright\_Directive</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm European myself and I did n't even know we had DMCA style legislation herehttp : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European \ _Copyright \ _Directive [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm European myself and I didn't even know we had DMCA style legislation herehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European\_Copyright\_Directive [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488656</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1261157700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The US is side pushing laws on others...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. sides with sovereign decisions. Canada is the little guy and likely to lose,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. sides with the little guys. And Canada is on the side of less copyright law<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. generally sides with sane laws.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The US is side pushing laws on others... /. sides with sovereign decisions .
Canada is the little guy and likely to lose , / .
sides with the little guys .
And Canada is on the side of less copyright law / .
generally sides with sane laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The US is side pushing laws on others... /. sides with sovereign decisions.
Canada is the little guy and likely to lose, /.
sides with the little guys.
And Canada is on the side of less copyright law /.
generally sides with sane laws.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488692</id>
	<title>Re:O Canada</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261157820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As an EU citizen, I completely agree.</p><p>It's bad enough that nothing we do over here seems to be able to stop our politicians from creating increasingly crazy laws, we shouldn't allow them to mess up Canada as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As an EU citizen , I completely agree.It 's bad enough that nothing we do over here seems to be able to stop our politicians from creating increasingly crazy laws , we should n't allow them to mess up Canada as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an EU citizen, I completely agree.It's bad enough that nothing we do over here seems to be able to stop our politicians from creating increasingly crazy laws, we shouldn't allow them to mess up Canada as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488796</id>
	<title>Pathetic</title>
	<author>lonestarw</author>
	<datestamp>1261158300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why? I miss the old liberal government for one and only on reason, They told of the American Ambassador Public over trying to influence us they need to say the same thing here.

 I understand that this goes on in the world with Iran and climate change and other topics but I enjoy our copyright laws.
I guess we (Canadians) need to examine our copyright laws and ask who do they serve? and who do they protect? and  where would all the money go to? and last is this going to promote business or make it a legal bog!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
I miss the old liberal government for one and only on reason , They told of the American Ambassador Public over trying to influence us they need to say the same thing here .
I understand that this goes on in the world with Iran and climate change and other topics but I enjoy our copyright laws .
I guess we ( Canadians ) need to examine our copyright laws and ask who do they serve ?
and who do they protect ?
and where would all the money go to ?
and last is this going to promote business or make it a legal bog !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
I miss the old liberal government for one and only on reason, They told of the American Ambassador Public over trying to influence us they need to say the same thing here.
I understand that this goes on in the world with Iran and climate change and other topics but I enjoy our copyright laws.
I guess we (Canadians) need to examine our copyright laws and ask who do they serve?
and who do they protect?
and  where would all the money go to?
and last is this going to promote business or make it a legal bog!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488728</id>
	<title>Damn EU</title>
	<author>BluenoseJake</author>
	<datestamp>1261157940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They can just fuck right off, I like my country the way it is, thank you very much</htmltext>
<tokenext>They can just fuck right off , I like my country the way it is , thank you very much</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can just fuck right off, I like my country the way it is, thank you very much</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488886</id>
	<title>Re:Disgusting...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261158660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... I think we have a Pirate Party in Canada now?  I'm not way older than their demographic, but they could well get my vote</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm .... I think we have a Pirate Party in Canada now ?
I 'm not way older than their demographic , but they could well get my vote</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm .... I think we have a Pirate Party in Canada now?
I'm not way older than their demographic, but they could well get my vote</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488518</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261157100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>AFAICT, we are constantly told that the EU is so much better in regards to medical care, social programs in general, environmental laws, gun laws, architecture, culture, art, world peace, sexual repression, drug laws, and trading value of the Euro vs. the dollar among other things, much of which is debatable, but hardly relevant here.  In general, the world's most developed countries are realizing that more and more of what they ("we", I suppose, since I''m in the US) have to trade on internationally is IP rather than physical goods, which can usually be made cheaper elsewhere.  If the developed countries want to keep their riches, they have to keep their IP secure.  I think the drive to implement (or "impose", depending on how you look at it) oppressive international IP agreements draws more fire when the US does it because at home and abroad the US is often perceived as an aggressive superpower exporting cultural imperialism.  On the other hand, when the EU does it, they are beneficently supporting artists' rights.</htmltext>
<tokenext>AFAICT , we are constantly told that the EU is so much better in regards to medical care , social programs in general , environmental laws , gun laws , architecture , culture , art , world peace , sexual repression , drug laws , and trading value of the Euro vs. the dollar among other things , much of which is debatable , but hardly relevant here .
In general , the world 's most developed countries are realizing that more and more of what they ( " we " , I suppose , since I ' 'm in the US ) have to trade on internationally is IP rather than physical goods , which can usually be made cheaper elsewhere .
If the developed countries want to keep their riches , they have to keep their IP secure .
I think the drive to implement ( or " impose " , depending on how you look at it ) oppressive international IP agreements draws more fire when the US does it because at home and abroad the US is often perceived as an aggressive superpower exporting cultural imperialism .
On the other hand , when the EU does it , they are beneficently supporting artists ' rights .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AFAICT, we are constantly told that the EU is so much better in regards to medical care, social programs in general, environmental laws, gun laws, architecture, culture, art, world peace, sexual repression, drug laws, and trading value of the Euro vs. the dollar among other things, much of which is debatable, but hardly relevant here.
In general, the world's most developed countries are realizing that more and more of what they ("we", I suppose, since I''m in the US) have to trade on internationally is IP rather than physical goods, which can usually be made cheaper elsewhere.
If the developed countries want to keep their riches, they have to keep their IP secure.
I think the drive to implement (or "impose", depending on how you look at it) oppressive international IP agreements draws more fire when the US does it because at home and abroad the US is often perceived as an aggressive superpower exporting cultural imperialism.
On the other hand, when the EU does it, they are beneficently supporting artists' rights.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488764</id>
	<title>Re:O Canada</title>
	<author>StripedCow</author>
	<datestamp>1261158180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Canadian people are supposed to make our laws.</p></div><p>Actually, after <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military\_history\_of\_Canada\_during\_the\_Second\_World\_War#Invasions\_of\_Europe" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">this</a> [wikipedia.org] shouldn't the EU take a more humble standpoint?</p><p>(You may say that this is an outdated argument, but in any case, it was less than 70 years ago, which is the minimum duration of copyright.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Canadian people are supposed to make our laws.Actually , after this [ wikipedia.org ] should n't the EU take a more humble standpoint ?
( You may say that this is an outdated argument , but in any case , it was less than 70 years ago , which is the minimum duration of copyright .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Canadian people are supposed to make our laws.Actually, after this [wikipedia.org] shouldn't the EU take a more humble standpoint?
(You may say that this is an outdated argument, but in any case, it was less than 70 years ago, which is the minimum duration of copyright.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490810</id>
	<title>Re:Who's going to keep track of these sales?</title>
	<author>schon</author>
	<datestamp>1261165140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Defeating the entire purpose of the law in the first place: to protect small time artists.</p></div><p>Where did you get that?</p><p>I'm pretty certain that the entire purpose of the law is to make large multinational corporations the gateholders to our arts and culture, and prevent small-time artists from entering the market from without sponsorship from said corps.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Defeating the entire purpose of the law in the first place : to protect small time artists.Where did you get that ? I 'm pretty certain that the entire purpose of the law is to make large multinational corporations the gateholders to our arts and culture , and prevent small-time artists from entering the market from without sponsorship from said corps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Defeating the entire purpose of the law in the first place: to protect small time artists.Where did you get that?I'm pretty certain that the entire purpose of the law is to make large multinational corporations the gateholders to our arts and culture, and prevent small-time artists from entering the market from without sponsorship from said corps.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489486</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>Minwee</author>
	<datestamp>1261160820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>As a Canadian, to all foreign powers who demand we change our laws to match yours, I say fuck you. Get your house in order before you tell us how to get ours in order.</p></div></blockquote><p>I don't buy your claim.  If you were really a Canadian, you would have asked more politely.  And the apologized for how their house wasn't in order, even though it wasn't your fault.  And then said the same thing in French.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a Canadian , to all foreign powers who demand we change our laws to match yours , I say fuck you .
Get your house in order before you tell us how to get ours in order.I do n't buy your claim .
If you were really a Canadian , you would have asked more politely .
And the apologized for how their house was n't in order , even though it was n't your fault .
And then said the same thing in French .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a Canadian, to all foreign powers who demand we change our laws to match yours, I say fuck you.
Get your house in order before you tell us how to get ours in order.I don't buy your claim.
If you were really a Canadian, you would have asked more politely.
And the apologized for how their house wasn't in order, even though it wasn't your fault.
And then said the same thing in French.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264</id>
	<title>As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>whisper\_jeff</author>
	<datestamp>1261156140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a Canadian, to all foreign powers who demand we change our laws to match yours, I say fuck you. Get your house in order before you tell us how to get ours in order.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a Canadian , to all foreign powers who demand we change our laws to match yours , I say fuck you .
Get your house in order before you tell us how to get ours in order .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a Canadian, to all foreign powers who demand we change our laws to match yours, I say fuck you.
Get your house in order before you tell us how to get ours in order.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30502762</id>
	<title>Re:I hope Canada stands up to this and says NO:</title>
	<author>Tuoqui</author>
	<datestamp>1261300800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope so too thats why I joined <a href="http://www.pirateparty.ca/" title="pirateparty.ca">http://www.pirateparty.ca/</a> [pirateparty.ca]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope so too thats why I joined http : //www.pirateparty.ca/ [ pirateparty.ca ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope so too thats why I joined http://www.pirateparty.ca/ [pirateparty.ca]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489126</id>
	<title>Re:O Canada</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261159560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes I am, but I haven't yet made up my mind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes I am , but I have n't yet made up my mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes I am, but I haven't yet made up my mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30496488</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>Nuitari The Wiz</author>
	<datestamp>1261157100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a Canadian, I have decided to actively help the Pirate Party set up shop in Canada. I am happy to say that we are on track to apply for registration in the next few weeks. We are just waiting on 2 pieces of paperwork (one from Industry Canada, one from an accounting firm) to complete the huge stack of paperwork we've already accumulated.</p><p>You can find more at <a href="http://www.pirateparty.ca/" title="pirateparty.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.pirateparty.ca/</a> [pirateparty.ca]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a Canadian , I have decided to actively help the Pirate Party set up shop in Canada .
I am happy to say that we are on track to apply for registration in the next few weeks .
We are just waiting on 2 pieces of paperwork ( one from Industry Canada , one from an accounting firm ) to complete the huge stack of paperwork we 've already accumulated.You can find more at http : //www.pirateparty.ca/ [ pirateparty.ca ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a Canadian, I have decided to actively help the Pirate Party set up shop in Canada.
I am happy to say that we are on track to apply for registration in the next few weeks.
We are just waiting on 2 pieces of paperwork (one from Industry Canada, one from an accounting firm) to complete the huge stack of paperwork we've already accumulated.You can find more at http://www.pirateparty.ca/ [pirateparty.ca]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488254</id>
	<title>O Canada</title>
	<author>RobVB</author>
	<datestamp>1261156080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please tell the EU to go fuck itself and/or adapt its copyright and patent law to the Canadian model.</p><p>And possibly to close Disneyland Paris, stop accepting money from **AA and start developing some common sense.</p><p>Crap, I think I overdid it with that last part. They are, after all, politicians. But if they're supposed to represent the European population, let me be the first to say this isn't what all of the population wants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please tell the EU to go fuck itself and/or adapt its copyright and patent law to the Canadian model.And possibly to close Disneyland Paris , stop accepting money from * * AA and start developing some common sense.Crap , I think I overdid it with that last part .
They are , after all , politicians .
But if they 're supposed to represent the European population , let me be the first to say this is n't what all of the population wants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please tell the EU to go fuck itself and/or adapt its copyright and patent law to the Canadian model.And possibly to close Disneyland Paris, stop accepting money from **AA and start developing some common sense.Crap, I think I overdid it with that last part.
They are, after all, politicians.
But if they're supposed to represent the European population, let me be the first to say this isn't what all of the population wants.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488294</id>
	<title>Sorry, no dice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261156260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like you europeans, but no freaking way!</p><p>Hey, trade is good, but not when it comes with such sweeping legal changes.</p><p>I will let my MP know that agreeing to this treaty is basically letting foreigners decide on our laws.</p><p>No amount of trade is worth my rights.</p><p>I will stand up and I will say no.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like you europeans , but no freaking way ! Hey , trade is good , but not when it comes with such sweeping legal changes.I will let my MP know that agreeing to this treaty is basically letting foreigners decide on our laws.No amount of trade is worth my rights.I will stand up and I will say no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like you europeans, but no freaking way!Hey, trade is good, but not when it comes with such sweeping legal changes.I will let my MP know that agreeing to this treaty is basically letting foreigners decide on our laws.No amount of trade is worth my rights.I will stand up and I will say no.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489288</id>
	<title>Re:Disgusting...</title>
	<author>langarto</author>
	<datestamp>1261160100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This type of news is disgusting to me as a Canadian.</p></div><p>They disgust me as an European, too.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This type of news is disgusting to me as a Canadian.They disgust me as an European , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This type of news is disgusting to me as a Canadian.They disgust me as an European, too.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489542</id>
	<title>It IS better. We're comparing to the US, remember?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261161060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It IS better. We're comparing to the US, remember? Just like when the US is found beating up prisoners, the 'merkins all yell about how we should all clean up China's act or North Korea etc because the US is better than Saddam was.</p><p>Same deal here: the EU IS better. Because the US is worse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It IS better .
We 're comparing to the US , remember ?
Just like when the US is found beating up prisoners , the 'merkins all yell about how we should all clean up China 's act or North Korea etc because the US is better than Saddam was.Same deal here : the EU IS better .
Because the US is worse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It IS better.
We're comparing to the US, remember?
Just like when the US is found beating up prisoners, the 'merkins all yell about how we should all clean up China's act or North Korea etc because the US is better than Saddam was.Same deal here: the EU IS better.
Because the US is worse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488772</id>
	<title>I'm sure...</title>
	<author>hazydave</author>
	<datestamp>1261158180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.. as soon as all of Europe has switched to drinking Blue, eating backbacon, wearing BC Dinner Jackets, Kodiaks, and a toque (particularly the French), and playing Hockey (a real sport) rather than "football", maybe the Canadians would once again take up the issue of copyright law<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-) Oh yeah, no more speaking French (outside of Quebec), they must pronounce the work "out" as "oooot", and they have to get some Timmy's opened.  And Universal Healthcare... oh wait, it the USA that still needs that. And Timmy's...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. as soon as all of Europe has switched to drinking Blue , eating backbacon , wearing BC Dinner Jackets , Kodiaks , and a toque ( particularly the French ) , and playing Hockey ( a real sport ) rather than " football " , maybe the Canadians would once again take up the issue of copyright law : - ) Oh yeah , no more speaking French ( outside of Quebec ) , they must pronounce the work " out " as " oooot " , and they have to get some Timmy 's opened .
And Universal Healthcare... oh wait , it the USA that still needs that .
And Timmy 's.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. as soon as all of Europe has switched to drinking Blue, eating backbacon, wearing BC Dinner Jackets, Kodiaks, and a toque (particularly the French), and playing Hockey (a real sport) rather than "football", maybe the Canadians would once again take up the issue of copyright law :-) Oh yeah, no more speaking French (outside of Quebec), they must pronounce the work "out" as "oooot", and they have to get some Timmy's opened.
And Universal Healthcare... oh wait, it the USA that still needs that.
And Timmy's...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30494096</id>
	<title>Re:wow...</title>
	<author>Piata</author>
	<datestamp>1261135380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The EU already banned the import of seal products. Canada's response was to put seal meat on parliament's cafeteria menu.</p><p>It's moments like that which make me proud to be a Canadian.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The EU already banned the import of seal products .
Canada 's response was to put seal meat on parliament 's cafeteria menu.It 's moments like that which make me proud to be a Canadian .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The EU already banned the import of seal products.
Canada's response was to put seal meat on parliament's cafeteria menu.It's moments like that which make me proud to be a Canadian.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30501146</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>psismondi</author>
	<datestamp>1261226340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Big government is not the problem, in Canada anyway. Although our government is indeed big, the current government of Canada is ultra-right-wing. They are determined to downsize government and reduce SOME regulation of industry.

However, a pro-business (and anti-public-interest) government like Canada's Harper government only favours deregulation if deregulation BENEFITS big business. They are all in favour of increasingly draconian criminal laws, military expenditure, and laws that convert essentially property and civil issues into criminal ones.

It does not go too far to suggest that these guys would be thrilled to turn governance of the country over to a few multinational corporations, backed up by a publicly funded quasi-military police force.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Big government is not the problem , in Canada anyway .
Although our government is indeed big , the current government of Canada is ultra-right-wing .
They are determined to downsize government and reduce SOME regulation of industry .
However , a pro-business ( and anti-public-interest ) government like Canada 's Harper government only favours deregulation if deregulation BENEFITS big business .
They are all in favour of increasingly draconian criminal laws , military expenditure , and laws that convert essentially property and civil issues into criminal ones .
It does not go too far to suggest that these guys would be thrilled to turn governance of the country over to a few multinational corporations , backed up by a publicly funded quasi-military police force .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Big government is not the problem, in Canada anyway.
Although our government is indeed big, the current government of Canada is ultra-right-wing.
They are determined to downsize government and reduce SOME regulation of industry.
However, a pro-business (and anti-public-interest) government like Canada's Harper government only favours deregulation if deregulation BENEFITS big business.
They are all in favour of increasingly draconian criminal laws, military expenditure, and laws that convert essentially property and civil issues into criminal ones.
It does not go too far to suggest that these guys would be thrilled to turn governance of the country over to a few multinational corporations, backed up by a publicly funded quasi-military police force.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1261156680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, if that comment had been made by an American, it would have attracted at least three angry comments before it was modded down to -1.  Instead it's +3 and rising.  What happened to unilateralism being bad?  The idea that a nation should act selfishly in its own national interest, with no thought as to how its actions will be perceived internationally?  Parent is an outright rejection, complete with profanity!  I'm really puzzled...honest question, not a flame.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , if that comment had been made by an American , it would have attracted at least three angry comments before it was modded down to -1 .
Instead it 's + 3 and rising .
What happened to unilateralism being bad ?
The idea that a nation should act selfishly in its own national interest , with no thought as to how its actions will be perceived internationally ?
Parent is an outright rejection , complete with profanity !
I 'm really puzzled...honest question , not a flame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, if that comment had been made by an American, it would have attracted at least three angry comments before it was modded down to -1.
Instead it's +3 and rising.
What happened to unilateralism being bad?
The idea that a nation should act selfishly in its own national interest, with no thought as to how its actions will be perceived internationally?
Parent is an outright rejection, complete with profanity!
I'm really puzzled...honest question, not a flame.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489410</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261160640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's because Americans are D-bags. -1 flame.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's because Americans are D-bags .
-1 flame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's because Americans are D-bags.
-1 flame.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490088</id>
	<title>Re:Disgusting...</title>
	<author>SilverEyes</author>
	<datestamp>1261162680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Historically, over 500000 canadians joined the protest against the last attempt to bring laws like this. Thats a 7\% swing in the vote towards the party that will stand up against this type of law making. Thats enough to win an election in Canada.</p></div><p>
Combine that with having a moustache (the only reason to vote for Layton), and you may even have a majority government<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Historically , over 500000 canadians joined the protest against the last attempt to bring laws like this .
Thats a 7 \ % swing in the vote towards the party that will stand up against this type of law making .
Thats enough to win an election in Canada .
Combine that with having a moustache ( the only reason to vote for Layton ) , and you may even have a majority government : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Historically, over 500000 canadians joined the protest against the last attempt to bring laws like this.
Thats a 7\% swing in the vote towards the party that will stand up against this type of law making.
Thats enough to win an election in Canada.
Combine that with having a moustache (the only reason to vote for Layton), and you may even have a majority government :P
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488458</id>
	<title>Disgusting...</title>
	<author>Synchis</author>
	<datestamp>1261156860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This type of news is disgusting to me as a Canadian.</p><p>Throughout the summer, Canada held an enormous copyright consultation in which large corporations expressed an interest in these types of changes, and artists, creators and citizens expressed an interest in the exact opposite direction to this.</p><p><a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/" title="michaelgeist.ca">Michael Geist</a> [michaelgeist.ca] usually carries all the latest news about this topic.</p><p>At the same time, I think we have nothing to worry about. In a country that shows a 30\% voter turnout (at best), that makes 6.9 million voters. Historically, over 500000 canadians joined the protest against the last attempt to bring laws like this. Thats a 7\% swing in the vote towards the party that will stand up against this type of law making. Thats enough to win an election in Canada.</p><p>With all this hype over copyright and trademark law, I expect it to be a hot topic in the next election, and with us running under a minority gov't, we could end up with an election at any time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This type of news is disgusting to me as a Canadian.Throughout the summer , Canada held an enormous copyright consultation in which large corporations expressed an interest in these types of changes , and artists , creators and citizens expressed an interest in the exact opposite direction to this.Michael Geist [ michaelgeist.ca ] usually carries all the latest news about this topic.At the same time , I think we have nothing to worry about .
In a country that shows a 30 \ % voter turnout ( at best ) , that makes 6.9 million voters .
Historically , over 500000 canadians joined the protest against the last attempt to bring laws like this .
Thats a 7 \ % swing in the vote towards the party that will stand up against this type of law making .
Thats enough to win an election in Canada.With all this hype over copyright and trademark law , I expect it to be a hot topic in the next election , and with us running under a minority gov't , we could end up with an election at any time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This type of news is disgusting to me as a Canadian.Throughout the summer, Canada held an enormous copyright consultation in which large corporations expressed an interest in these types of changes, and artists, creators and citizens expressed an interest in the exact opposite direction to this.Michael Geist [michaelgeist.ca] usually carries all the latest news about this topic.At the same time, I think we have nothing to worry about.
In a country that shows a 30\% voter turnout (at best), that makes 6.9 million voters.
Historically, over 500000 canadians joined the protest against the last attempt to bring laws like this.
Thats a 7\% swing in the vote towards the party that will stand up against this type of law making.
Thats enough to win an election in Canada.With all this hype over copyright and trademark law, I expect it to be a hot topic in the next election, and with us running under a minority gov't, we could end up with an election at any time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488420</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>Colonel Korn</author>
	<datestamp>1261156680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Aren't we constantly told that the EU is so much better in regards to patents and copyrights and it's only the big bad US that is constantly trying to push all this stuff on people?</p></div><p>No, we're not.  The EU is the hot spot for three strikes laws.  If anything, it's usually shown as an example of a dark possible future for the US.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't we constantly told that the EU is so much better in regards to patents and copyrights and it 's only the big bad US that is constantly trying to push all this stuff on people ? No , we 're not .
The EU is the hot spot for three strikes laws .
If anything , it 's usually shown as an example of a dark possible future for the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't we constantly told that the EU is so much better in regards to patents and copyrights and it's only the big bad US that is constantly trying to push all this stuff on people?No, we're not.
The EU is the hot spot for three strikes laws.
If anything, it's usually shown as an example of a dark possible future for the US.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488628</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261157580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's jealousy.</p><p>No one is jealous of Canada, so there's no reason to hate on them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's jealousy.No one is jealous of Canada , so there 's no reason to hate on them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's jealousy.No one is jealous of Canada, so there's no reason to hate on them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488184</id>
	<title>I'm surprised</title>
	<author>Lord Lode</author>
	<datestamp>1261155840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm European myself and I didn't even know we had DMCA style legislation here, and also not that the EU would demand something from Canada. Now this article combines both. How is this possible?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm European myself and I did n't even know we had DMCA style legislation here , and also not that the EU would demand something from Canada .
Now this article combines both .
How is this possible ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm European myself and I didn't even know we had DMCA style legislation here, and also not that the EU would demand something from Canada.
Now this article combines both.
How is this possible?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488640</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1261157640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And we here in Europe. We the actual people. We are on your side.</p><p>If only you had the war power of the US. Then I would ask you to free us from the oppressive and illegal &ldquo;government&rdquo; that is the EU body. Come here. Wreck shit! You are welcome.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And we here in Europe .
We the actual people .
We are on your side.If only you had the war power of the US .
Then I would ask you to free us from the oppressive and illegal    government    that is the EU body .
Come here .
Wreck shit !
You are welcome .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And we here in Europe.
We the actual people.
We are on your side.If only you had the war power of the US.
Then I would ask you to free us from the oppressive and illegal “government” that is the EU body.
Come here.
Wreck shit!
You are welcome.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488564</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1261157340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Get your house in order before you tell us how to get ours in order."</p><p>Don't confuse law with order, or order with any desirable state.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Get your house in order before you tell us how to get ours in order .
" Do n't confuse law with order , or order with any desirable state .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Get your house in order before you tell us how to get ours in order.
"Don't confuse law with order, or order with any desirable state.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488200</id>
	<title>No problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261155900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So long as it's the Europeans bending them over the kitchen table and not the Americans, the Canadians will be perfectly happy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So long as it 's the Europeans bending them over the kitchen table and not the Americans , the Canadians will be perfectly happy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So long as it's the Europeans bending them over the kitchen table and not the Americans, the Canadians will be perfectly happy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489204</id>
	<title>Re:Disgusting...</title>
	<author>ubercam</author>
	<datestamp>1261159800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only way it would affect anything is if these particular 7\% of voters were concentrated only in the swing ridings, where the races are within a couple votes. If they were evenly distributed across the country, since we have the first past the post system, I doubt it would affect much.</p><p>In my neck of the woods, in the Tach&eacute; riding in SE Manitoba, no matter who you vote for, the Conservatives win, because their candidate, Vic Toews, is a senior cabinet member. He was the Justice Minister for a while, but I think he's head of the Treasury Board now. People like that. They want their local MP to be an important person. No one has ever heard of any of the other candidates on the ballot. The Greens got like 200 votes last time around, Liberals a couple thousand, NDP less, but Toews takes the cake every time (he had something like 12,000-15,000 votes). AFAIK the majority of the population in Tach&eacute; are Mennonites and they usually always stick to their kind in business, pleasure and politics, so Toews winning every time is no surprise at all. Hell, the guy had an affair publicly disclosed and it still didn't affect his popularity at all, and that's a VERY BIG no-no for a Mennonite, let me tell you. A 7\% increase in Liberal votes wouldn't even dent Toews' lead, which is usually at least double what the next best candidate gets.</p><p>But yeah, like you said, with this minority government, where an election could be called at any time over any issue at all, even copyright, all it takes is a couple seats in the election for the opposition to get enough of them to be able to force the hand of the ruling party and make sure everyone works together for a consensus. They've been fairly successful at this the last couple times around, with a few exceptions, but they need to get their acts together. IMHO, the NDP need new leadership, and the Liberals need to figure out what the hell they're doing too in that area, and the Greens really need to step up their campaign and advertise just as much as the big 3. They were pretty quiet last time, but I was happy to see Elizabeth May in the CBC debate, that was really good.</p><p>Anyway, I think all of our governments should minorities really, since they actually have to work together and agree to get anything done, and coming to an agreement means they (should) have to take the views of the entire population into account. I also wish they, and every other government around the world, would stop using emotionally charged issues, such as kiddie porn, to pass crappy laws no one would even consider if it didn't have that label attached to it. Oh, we're still allowed to dream right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only way it would affect anything is if these particular 7 \ % of voters were concentrated only in the swing ridings , where the races are within a couple votes .
If they were evenly distributed across the country , since we have the first past the post system , I doubt it would affect much.In my neck of the woods , in the Tach   riding in SE Manitoba , no matter who you vote for , the Conservatives win , because their candidate , Vic Toews , is a senior cabinet member .
He was the Justice Minister for a while , but I think he 's head of the Treasury Board now .
People like that .
They want their local MP to be an important person .
No one has ever heard of any of the other candidates on the ballot .
The Greens got like 200 votes last time around , Liberals a couple thousand , NDP less , but Toews takes the cake every time ( he had something like 12,000-15,000 votes ) .
AFAIK the majority of the population in Tach   are Mennonites and they usually always stick to their kind in business , pleasure and politics , so Toews winning every time is no surprise at all .
Hell , the guy had an affair publicly disclosed and it still did n't affect his popularity at all , and that 's a VERY BIG no-no for a Mennonite , let me tell you .
A 7 \ % increase in Liberal votes would n't even dent Toews ' lead , which is usually at least double what the next best candidate gets.But yeah , like you said , with this minority government , where an election could be called at any time over any issue at all , even copyright , all it takes is a couple seats in the election for the opposition to get enough of them to be able to force the hand of the ruling party and make sure everyone works together for a consensus .
They 've been fairly successful at this the last couple times around , with a few exceptions , but they need to get their acts together .
IMHO , the NDP need new leadership , and the Liberals need to figure out what the hell they 're doing too in that area , and the Greens really need to step up their campaign and advertise just as much as the big 3 .
They were pretty quiet last time , but I was happy to see Elizabeth May in the CBC debate , that was really good.Anyway , I think all of our governments should minorities really , since they actually have to work together and agree to get anything done , and coming to an agreement means they ( should ) have to take the views of the entire population into account .
I also wish they , and every other government around the world , would stop using emotionally charged issues , such as kiddie porn , to pass crappy laws no one would even consider if it did n't have that label attached to it .
Oh , we 're still allowed to dream right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only way it would affect anything is if these particular 7\% of voters were concentrated only in the swing ridings, where the races are within a couple votes.
If they were evenly distributed across the country, since we have the first past the post system, I doubt it would affect much.In my neck of the woods, in the Taché riding in SE Manitoba, no matter who you vote for, the Conservatives win, because their candidate, Vic Toews, is a senior cabinet member.
He was the Justice Minister for a while, but I think he's head of the Treasury Board now.
People like that.
They want their local MP to be an important person.
No one has ever heard of any of the other candidates on the ballot.
The Greens got like 200 votes last time around, Liberals a couple thousand, NDP less, but Toews takes the cake every time (he had something like 12,000-15,000 votes).
AFAIK the majority of the population in Taché are Mennonites and they usually always stick to their kind in business, pleasure and politics, so Toews winning every time is no surprise at all.
Hell, the guy had an affair publicly disclosed and it still didn't affect his popularity at all, and that's a VERY BIG no-no for a Mennonite, let me tell you.
A 7\% increase in Liberal votes wouldn't even dent Toews' lead, which is usually at least double what the next best candidate gets.But yeah, like you said, with this minority government, where an election could be called at any time over any issue at all, even copyright, all it takes is a couple seats in the election for the opposition to get enough of them to be able to force the hand of the ruling party and make sure everyone works together for a consensus.
They've been fairly successful at this the last couple times around, with a few exceptions, but they need to get their acts together.
IMHO, the NDP need new leadership, and the Liberals need to figure out what the hell they're doing too in that area, and the Greens really need to step up their campaign and advertise just as much as the big 3.
They were pretty quiet last time, but I was happy to see Elizabeth May in the CBC debate, that was really good.Anyway, I think all of our governments should minorities really, since they actually have to work together and agree to get anything done, and coming to an agreement means they (should) have to take the views of the entire population into account.
I also wish they, and every other government around the world, would stop using emotionally charged issues, such as kiddie porn, to pass crappy laws no one would even consider if it didn't have that label attached to it.
Oh, we're still allowed to dream right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30493078</id>
	<title>Re:wow...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261130460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not just you. Both follow the model of market illiberalism, and both territories systems have been captured by the same people.</p><p>Sorry. Instinctive pro European, but speaking as someone who is very much, ahem, losing my religion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not just you .
Both follow the model of market illiberalism , and both territories systems have been captured by the same people.Sorry .
Instinctive pro European , but speaking as someone who is very much , ahem , losing my religion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not just you.
Both follow the model of market illiberalism, and both territories systems have been captured by the same people.Sorry.
Instinctive pro European, but speaking as someone who is very much, ahem, losing my religion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488958</id>
	<title>Re:And Canada is...</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1261158960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hm, they still want to have something to do with the Queen, it would seem.</p><p>And are much closer to full memberstate of ESA that my country, supposedly European one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hm , they still want to have something to do with the Queen , it would seem.And are much closer to full memberstate of ESA that my country , supposedly European one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hm, they still want to have something to do with the Queen, it would seem.And are much closer to full memberstate of ESA that my country, supposedly European one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489358</id>
	<title>Re:I hope Canada stands up to this and says NO:</title>
	<author>Obyron</author>
	<datestamp>1261160400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Does this go for hard drives and bandwidth?</i> <br> <br>

For bandwidth, yes. All major ISPs in Canada still cap bandwidth, and all of them additionally throttle P2P. I moved here from the states, and let me tell you, compared to this America is a shining beacon of the future when it comes to broadband.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this go for hard drives and bandwidth ?
For bandwidth , yes .
All major ISPs in Canada still cap bandwidth , and all of them additionally throttle P2P .
I moved here from the states , and let me tell you , compared to this America is a shining beacon of the future when it comes to broadband .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this go for hard drives and bandwidth?
For bandwidth, yes.
All major ISPs in Canada still cap bandwidth, and all of them additionally throttle P2P.
I moved here from the states, and let me tell you, compared to this America is a shining beacon of the future when it comes to broadband.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489942</id>
	<title>Re:Disgusting...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>In a country that shows a 30\% voter turnout (at best), that makes 6.9 million voters. Historically, over 500000 canadians joined the protest against the last attempt to bring laws like this. Thats a 7\% swing in the vote towards the party that will stand up against this type of law making. Thats enough to win an election in Canada.</i></p><p>Ummm, no. Have you been smoking the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BC\_Bud" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">BC bud</a> [wikipedia.org]? There has never been a Federal election with a 30\% turnout.</p><p>The turnout for the <a href="http://www.elections.ca/content.asp?section=pas&amp;document=turnout&amp;lang=e" title="elections.ca" rel="nofollow">last Canadian Federal election</a> [elections.ca] was 58.8\%.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a country that shows a 30 \ % voter turnout ( at best ) , that makes 6.9 million voters .
Historically , over 500000 canadians joined the protest against the last attempt to bring laws like this .
Thats a 7 \ % swing in the vote towards the party that will stand up against this type of law making .
Thats enough to win an election in Canada.Ummm , no .
Have you been smoking the BC bud [ wikipedia.org ] ?
There has never been a Federal election with a 30 \ % turnout.The turnout for the last Canadian Federal election [ elections.ca ] was 58.8 \ % .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a country that shows a 30\% voter turnout (at best), that makes 6.9 million voters.
Historically, over 500000 canadians joined the protest against the last attempt to bring laws like this.
Thats a 7\% swing in the vote towards the party that will stand up against this type of law making.
Thats enough to win an election in Canada.Ummm, no.
Have you been smoking the BC bud [wikipedia.org]?
There has never been a Federal election with a 30\% turnout.The turnout for the last Canadian Federal election [elections.ca] was 58.8\%.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488330</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>Shakrai</author>
	<datestamp>1261156380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Aren't we constantly told that the EU is so much better in regards to patents and copyrights and it's only the big bad US that is constantly trying to push all this stuff on people?</p></div><p>I would argue that big Government is the problem here.  If you take an individual country the size of Sweden or Canada it's more probable that it will be responsive to the concerns and needs of it's citizens.  Take a large bloated government like the US Federal Government or EU and it seems to be more probable that it gets bought off by a combination of machine politics and special interests.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't we constantly told that the EU is so much better in regards to patents and copyrights and it 's only the big bad US that is constantly trying to push all this stuff on people ? I would argue that big Government is the problem here .
If you take an individual country the size of Sweden or Canada it 's more probable that it will be responsive to the concerns and needs of it 's citizens .
Take a large bloated government like the US Federal Government or EU and it seems to be more probable that it gets bought off by a combination of machine politics and special interests .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't we constantly told that the EU is so much better in regards to patents and copyrights and it's only the big bad US that is constantly trying to push all this stuff on people?I would argue that big Government is the problem here.
If you take an individual country the size of Sweden or Canada it's more probable that it will be responsive to the concerns and needs of it's citizens.
Take a large bloated government like the US Federal Government or EU and it seems to be more probable that it gets bought off by a combination of machine politics and special interests.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489806</id>
	<title>from canada with love</title>
	<author>CHRONOSS2008</author>
	<datestamp>1261161780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>fuck off</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>fuck off</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fuck off</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30495086</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1261141440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You know, if that comment had been made by an American, it would have attracted at least three angry comments before it was modded down to -1. Instead it's +3 and rising. What happened to unilateralism being bad? The idea that a nation should act selfishly in its own national interest, with no thought as to how its actions will be perceived internationally?</p></div><p>Said idea, at least insofar as I have seen, is generally only applied to acts of a nation that are performed outside its borders. All countries act selfishly within them - we call that "national sovereignty".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , if that comment had been made by an American , it would have attracted at least three angry comments before it was modded down to -1 .
Instead it 's + 3 and rising .
What happened to unilateralism being bad ?
The idea that a nation should act selfishly in its own national interest , with no thought as to how its actions will be perceived internationally ? Said idea , at least insofar as I have seen , is generally only applied to acts of a nation that are performed outside its borders .
All countries act selfishly within them - we call that " national sovereignty " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, if that comment had been made by an American, it would have attracted at least three angry comments before it was modded down to -1.
Instead it's +3 and rising.
What happened to unilateralism being bad?
The idea that a nation should act selfishly in its own national interest, with no thought as to how its actions will be perceived internationally?Said idea, at least insofar as I have seen, is generally only applied to acts of a nation that are performed outside its borders.
All countries act selfishly within them - we call that "national sovereignty".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488224</id>
	<title>Just as a Matter of Principal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261155960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just as a matter of principal, Canada should give them a nice hearty "F**k you, eh!"<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just as a matter of principal , Canada should give them a nice hearty " F * * k you , eh !
"  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just as a matter of principal, Canada should give them a nice hearty "F**k you, eh!
"
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489614</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>Again</author>
	<datestamp>1261161300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I would argue that big Government is the problem here.  If you take an individual country the size of Sweden or Canada it's more probable that it will be responsive to the concerns and needs of it's citizens.  Take a large bloated government like the US Federal Government or EU and it seems to be more probable that it gets bought off by a combination of machine politics and special interests.</p></div><p>As a Canadian I would argue that our government is owned entirely by corporations. My vote goes to the politician who has sold his soul to the Canadian corporations.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would argue that big Government is the problem here .
If you take an individual country the size of Sweden or Canada it 's more probable that it will be responsive to the concerns and needs of it 's citizens .
Take a large bloated government like the US Federal Government or EU and it seems to be more probable that it gets bought off by a combination of machine politics and special interests.As a Canadian I would argue that our government is owned entirely by corporations .
My vote goes to the politician who has sold his soul to the Canadian corporations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would argue that big Government is the problem here.
If you take an individual country the size of Sweden or Canada it's more probable that it will be responsive to the concerns and needs of it's citizens.
Take a large bloated government like the US Federal Government or EU and it seems to be more probable that it gets bought off by a combination of machine politics and special interests.As a Canadian I would argue that our government is owned entirely by corporations.
My vote goes to the politician who has sold his soul to the Canadian corporations.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30493150</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261130760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I unfortunatley live within the EU and how dare they evn think of trying to tell a country that is no part of it HOW to organise their laws if i was Canada i would be telling the EU to go fuck them selfs  i just wish a few more people here would do likewise and dump the pile of dog crap that is the EU .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I unfortunatley live within the EU and how dare they evn think of trying to tell a country that is no part of it HOW to organise their laws if i was Canada i would be telling the EU to go fuck them selfs i just wish a few more people here would do likewise and dump the pile of dog crap that is the EU .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I unfortunatley live within the EU and how dare they evn think of trying to tell a country that is no part of it HOW to organise their laws if i was Canada i would be telling the EU to go fuck them selfs  i just wish a few more people here would do likewise and dump the pile of dog crap that is the EU .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488192</id>
	<title>I hope Canada stands up to this and says NO:</title>
	<author>pecosdave</author>
	<datestamp>1261155840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They have enough asinine copyright laws as it is.  Seriously?  An extra charge on blank optical and tape media because it "might" be used to pirate?  Does this go for hard drives and bandwidth?  I'm with the current US and Canada system.  The artist don't benefit much, it's the royalty houses are the ones that really benefit.  Don't they get enough from performance, broadcast, sales, etc..?  Artist can go broke trying to collect their money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They have enough asinine copyright laws as it is .
Seriously ? An extra charge on blank optical and tape media because it " might " be used to pirate ?
Does this go for hard drives and bandwidth ?
I 'm with the current US and Canada system .
The artist do n't benefit much , it 's the royalty houses are the ones that really benefit .
Do n't they get enough from performance , broadcast , sales , etc.. ?
Artist can go broke trying to collect their money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They have enough asinine copyright laws as it is.
Seriously?  An extra charge on blank optical and tape media because it "might" be used to pirate?
Does this go for hard drives and bandwidth?
I'm with the current US and Canada system.
The artist don't benefit much, it's the royalty houses are the ones that really benefit.
Don't they get enough from performance, broadcast, sales, etc..?
Artist can go broke trying to collect their money.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488160</id>
	<title>EU demands that CmdrTaco get a penis extension</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261155720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The draft text says that CmdrTaco's 2 inch baby dick needs to be lengthened and widened because it is massively undersized and pathetic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The draft text says that CmdrTaco 's 2 inch baby dick needs to be lengthened and widened because it is massively undersized and pathetic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The draft text says that CmdrTaco's 2 inch baby dick needs to be lengthened and widened because it is massively undersized and pathetic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488836</id>
	<title>Re:Just as a Matter of Principal</title>
	<author>ThatsNotFunny</author>
	<datestamp>1261158360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're not my buddy, fwend.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're not my buddy , fwend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're not my buddy, fwend.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488274</id>
	<title>Re:I'm surprised</title>
	<author>H.G.Blob</author>
	<datestamp>1261156140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The summary is terrible, there is no DMCA style legislation in the EU. The article says:<p><div class="quote"><p>The U.S. has proposed provisions that would mandate a DMCA-style implementation for the WIPO Internet treaties and encourage the adoption of a three-strikes and you're out system to cut off access where there are repeated allegations of infringement.</p> </div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary is terrible , there is no DMCA style legislation in the EU .
The article says : The U.S. has proposed provisions that would mandate a DMCA-style implementation for the WIPO Internet treaties and encourage the adoption of a three-strikes and you 're out system to cut off access where there are repeated allegations of infringement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary is terrible, there is no DMCA style legislation in the EU.
The article says:The U.S. has proposed provisions that would mandate a DMCA-style implementation for the WIPO Internet treaties and encourage the adoption of a three-strikes and you're out system to cut off access where there are repeated allegations of infringement. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488432</id>
	<title>International Bullying</title>
	<author>Adrian Lopez</author>
	<datestamp>1261156740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Canada should not allow itself to be bullied into adopting bad copyright law. While the European Union appears quite eager to be as bad (or worse) than the United States in terms of harmful copyright legislation, I sincerely hope Canada will put its citizens interests above those of copyright holders. I'm not against globalization, but countries must sometimes defend their sovereignty for the sake of their citizens.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Canada should not allow itself to be bullied into adopting bad copyright law .
While the European Union appears quite eager to be as bad ( or worse ) than the United States in terms of harmful copyright legislation , I sincerely hope Canada will put its citizens interests above those of copyright holders .
I 'm not against globalization , but countries must sometimes defend their sovereignty for the sake of their citizens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Canada should not allow itself to be bullied into adopting bad copyright law.
While the European Union appears quite eager to be as bad (or worse) than the United States in terms of harmful copyright legislation, I sincerely hope Canada will put its citizens interests above those of copyright holders.
I'm not against globalization, but countries must sometimes defend their sovereignty for the sake of their citizens.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488586</id>
	<title>Canadians speak up!</title>
	<author>ubergeek65536</author>
	<datestamp>1261157400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you are as pissed off about other countries trying to write our laws write your MP and the following Ministers.</p><p>Tony Clement<br>Minister of Industry<br><a href="http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/ic1.nsf/eng/00093.html" title="ic.gc.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/ic1.nsf/eng/00093.html</a> [ic.gc.ca]<br>minister.industry@ic.gc.ca</p><p>Bev Oda<br>Minister of International Cooperation<br><a href="http://www.bevoda.ca/" title="bevoda.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.bevoda.ca/</a> [bevoda.ca]<br>Oda.B@parl.gc.ca</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you are as pissed off about other countries trying to write our laws write your MP and the following Ministers.Tony ClementMinister of Industryhttp : //www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/ic1.nsf/eng/00093.html [ ic.gc.ca ] minister.industry @ ic.gc.caBev OdaMinister of International Cooperationhttp : //www.bevoda.ca/ [ bevoda.ca ] Oda.B @ parl.gc.ca</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you are as pissed off about other countries trying to write our laws write your MP and the following Ministers.Tony ClementMinister of Industryhttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/ic1.nsf/eng/00093.html [ic.gc.ca]minister.industry@ic.gc.caBev OdaMinister of International Cooperationhttp://www.bevoda.ca/ [bevoda.ca]Oda.B@parl.gc.ca</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491162</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>ChiRaven</author>
	<datestamp>1261166400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As a Canadian, to all foreign powers who demand we change our laws to match yours, I say fuck you. Get your house in order before you tell us how to get ours in order.</p></div><p>Hope your politicians see things the same way.  But politicians as a breed listen to money (especially **AA money) MUCH more closely than they do to their constituents.  After all, nobody ever got voted out of office for supporting the **AA line.  The voting population just doesn't care enough to act.  At least not here in the US, and not anywhere as far as I know.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a Canadian , to all foreign powers who demand we change our laws to match yours , I say fuck you .
Get your house in order before you tell us how to get ours in order.Hope your politicians see things the same way .
But politicians as a breed listen to money ( especially * * AA money ) MUCH more closely than they do to their constituents .
After all , nobody ever got voted out of office for supporting the * * AA line .
The voting population just does n't care enough to act .
At least not here in the US , and not anywhere as far as I know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a Canadian, to all foreign powers who demand we change our laws to match yours, I say fuck you.
Get your house in order before you tell us how to get ours in order.Hope your politicians see things the same way.
But politicians as a breed listen to money (especially **AA money) MUCH more closely than they do to their constituents.
After all, nobody ever got voted out of office for supporting the **AA line.
The voting population just doesn't care enough to act.
At least not here in the US, and not anywhere as far as I know.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490978</id>
	<title>Re:Just as a Matter of Principal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261165680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dude, there is no comma before the "eh".
If you're going to affect a colloquialism, at least get it right.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , there is no comma before the " eh " .
If you 're going to affect a colloquialism , at least get it right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, there is no comma before the "eh".
If you're going to affect a colloquialism, at least get it right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489576</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1261161180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not the U.S. that is behind all of this.  I believe it is the powerfully rich media publishers behind all of this.  They corrupted and influenced the U.S. government which has been pushing other governments to do the same.  At the same time, I think the same media publishers are pushing other governments with the same purpose and intent.</p><p>We need a "corruption" tag on here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not the U.S. that is behind all of this .
I believe it is the powerfully rich media publishers behind all of this .
They corrupted and influenced the U.S. government which has been pushing other governments to do the same .
At the same time , I think the same media publishers are pushing other governments with the same purpose and intent.We need a " corruption " tag on here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not the U.S. that is behind all of this.
I believe it is the powerfully rich media publishers behind all of this.
They corrupted and influenced the U.S. government which has been pushing other governments to do the same.
At the same time, I think the same media publishers are pushing other governments with the same purpose and intent.We need a "corruption" tag on here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490140</id>
	<title>Re:No problem</title>
	<author>green1</author>
	<datestamp>1261162860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My bigger concern is that, while Canada has so far resisted the Americans on this issue, with the added weight of the EU applying pressure on this same issue, the politicians (who are very much bought and paid for by big business anyway) will simply conclude that Canada is obviously the last place in the world that hasn't done this, and therefore happily take away our freedoms in the name of "progress"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My bigger concern is that , while Canada has so far resisted the Americans on this issue , with the added weight of the EU applying pressure on this same issue , the politicians ( who are very much bought and paid for by big business anyway ) will simply conclude that Canada is obviously the last place in the world that has n't done this , and therefore happily take away our freedoms in the name of " progress "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My bigger concern is that, while Canada has so far resisted the Americans on this issue, with the added weight of the EU applying pressure on this same issue, the politicians (who are very much bought and paid for by big business anyway) will simply conclude that Canada is obviously the last place in the world that hasn't done this, and therefore happily take away our freedoms in the name of "progress"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30505568</id>
	<title>Re:I'm surprised</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1261338540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>there is no DMCA style legislation in the EU.</p></div> </blockquote><p>I thought France did, just a few weeks ago?  <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/09/16/1144256" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/09/16/1144256</a> [slashdot.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>there is no DMCA style legislation in the EU .
I thought France did , just a few weeks ago ?
http : //yro.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 09/09/16/1144256 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there is no DMCA style legislation in the EU.
I thought France did, just a few weeks ago?
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/09/16/1144256 [slashdot.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489056</id>
	<title>I am ashamed to be European</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1261159260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry for the asshattery.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry for the asshattery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry for the asshattery.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488316</id>
	<title>EU???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261156320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The last time I checked Canada wasn't in Europe.  Let's hope our politicians realize that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The last time I checked Canada was n't in Europe .
Let 's hope our politicians realize that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The last time I checked Canada wasn't in Europe.
Let's hope our politicians realize that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489332</id>
	<title>Re:O Canada</title>
	<author>kent\_eh</author>
	<datestamp>1261160280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Mr. PM are you listening?</p></div><p>I'm pretty sure he isn't. <br>
I have seen a fair bit of evidence that he doesn't give a damn what us voters think.<br> <br>
I hope they don't try again with the copyright bill, just to sooth the hurting that they are getting from the rest of the world at the climate conference this week.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr. PM are you listening ? I 'm pretty sure he is n't .
I have seen a fair bit of evidence that he does n't give a damn what us voters think .
I hope they do n't try again with the copyright bill , just to sooth the hurting that they are getting from the rest of the world at the climate conference this week .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr. PM are you listening?I'm pretty sure he isn't.
I have seen a fair bit of evidence that he doesn't give a damn what us voters think.
I hope they don't try again with the copyright bill, just to sooth the hurting that they are getting from the rest of the world at the climate conference this week.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489954</id>
	<title>COPYRIGHTS can blow me</title>
	<author>CHRONOSS2008</author>
	<datestamp>1261162320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and a correction form the above 2 word statement:</p><p>fuck off, eh</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and a correction form the above 2 word statement : fuck off , eh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and a correction form the above 2 word statement:fuck off, eh</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488578</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30493828</id>
	<title>Re:Well that's it for that then</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261133880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure I agree. Don't get me wrong, I hate oppressive copyright too; what I mean is that everything I've seen so far from the current government points towards hopeless incompetence on international matters. I'm sure they'd love to play follow-the-leader with big and influential nations, but "Not Offending The People Over There" is about the best result anyone can hope for at the moment (as with the recent visit to China, which seemed to accomplish exactly that... possibly repairing some of the damage from earlier).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure I agree .
Do n't get me wrong , I hate oppressive copyright too ; what I mean is that everything I 've seen so far from the current government points towards hopeless incompetence on international matters .
I 'm sure they 'd love to play follow-the-leader with big and influential nations , but " Not Offending The People Over There " is about the best result anyone can hope for at the moment ( as with the recent visit to China , which seemed to accomplish exactly that... possibly repairing some of the damage from earlier ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure I agree.
Don't get me wrong, I hate oppressive copyright too; what I mean is that everything I've seen so far from the current government points towards hopeless incompetence on international matters.
I'm sure they'd love to play follow-the-leader with big and influential nations, but "Not Offending The People Over There" is about the best result anyone can hope for at the moment (as with the recent visit to China, which seemed to accomplish exactly that... possibly repairing some of the damage from earlier).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488190</id>
	<title>And Canada is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261155840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And Canada is in the <b>European</b> Union?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And Canada is in the European Union ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And Canada is in the European Union?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488418</id>
	<title>Welcome back in the fold, eh?</title>
	<author>Bearhouse</author>
	<datestamp>1261156680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, it will be interesting to see how this plays out...<br>Even though the English and French lost their footholds in Canada a long time ago, they still lovedto play games, viz. De Gaulle's "Vive le Quebec Libre" speech.<br>The spiritual successors to the former European empire-builders are the EU civil servants, determined to prove that they, and 'Europe' exist as an entity and are important.<br>Pretty-much blackmailing small states, such as the Baltics, into accepting terms of admission - that the larger states ignore - has worked well until now.<br>It would seem less certain to work with Canada, which does the vast majority of its trade with...the USA under NAFTA.<br>I reckon isohunt.com is safe for a while...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it will be interesting to see how this plays out...Even though the English and French lost their footholds in Canada a long time ago , they still lovedto play games , viz .
De Gaulle 's " Vive le Quebec Libre " speech.The spiritual successors to the former European empire-builders are the EU civil servants , determined to prove that they , and 'Europe ' exist as an entity and are important.Pretty-much blackmailing small states , such as the Baltics , into accepting terms of admission - that the larger states ignore - has worked well until now.It would seem less certain to work with Canada , which does the vast majority of its trade with...the USA under NAFTA.I reckon isohunt.com is safe for a while.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it will be interesting to see how this plays out...Even though the English and French lost their footholds in Canada a long time ago, they still lovedto play games, viz.
De Gaulle's "Vive le Quebec Libre" speech.The spiritual successors to the former European empire-builders are the EU civil servants, determined to prove that they, and 'Europe' exist as an entity and are important.Pretty-much blackmailing small states, such as the Baltics, into accepting terms of admission - that the larger states ignore - has worked well until now.It would seem less certain to work with Canada, which does the vast majority of its trade with...the USA under NAFTA.I reckon isohunt.com is safe for a while...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491358</id>
	<title>EU is the battleground</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1261167240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>EU is not a monolithic body, and concerning copyrights it's a violent battleground between the two sides. New repressions are raised as proposed laws by member countries then struck down by the EU parliament majority. Laws forbidding such repressions are raised and fought over as well. Commissions (which are generally pro-copyright and do most of the work) try to circumvent the parliament (which has the final vote and is generally pro-freedom), then the parliament members notice the shenanigans, bitchslap the commissions into place and try to set things straight. Sometimes the commissions manage to slip something under the radar of parliament, sometimes the parliament passes laws that make some commissions' efforts illegal.</p><p>I'm pretty sure this treaty was a draft prepared by one of the commissions, which when it hit the parliament, would either be struck down or modified so heavily not a word would go unchanged. OTOH the commissioners could try to pass it as "pretty much final version just pending a couple signatures, please adapt to this and when the treaty goes live your law will match the requirements of the treaty 100\%". Of course when the treaty goes live it would be nothing like it was when this proposition was made but the harm has been done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>EU is not a monolithic body , and concerning copyrights it 's a violent battleground between the two sides .
New repressions are raised as proposed laws by member countries then struck down by the EU parliament majority .
Laws forbidding such repressions are raised and fought over as well .
Commissions ( which are generally pro-copyright and do most of the work ) try to circumvent the parliament ( which has the final vote and is generally pro-freedom ) , then the parliament members notice the shenanigans , bitchslap the commissions into place and try to set things straight .
Sometimes the commissions manage to slip something under the radar of parliament , sometimes the parliament passes laws that make some commissions ' efforts illegal.I 'm pretty sure this treaty was a draft prepared by one of the commissions , which when it hit the parliament , would either be struck down or modified so heavily not a word would go unchanged .
OTOH the commissioners could try to pass it as " pretty much final version just pending a couple signatures , please adapt to this and when the treaty goes live your law will match the requirements of the treaty 100 \ % " .
Of course when the treaty goes live it would be nothing like it was when this proposition was made but the harm has been done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>EU is not a monolithic body, and concerning copyrights it's a violent battleground between the two sides.
New repressions are raised as proposed laws by member countries then struck down by the EU parliament majority.
Laws forbidding such repressions are raised and fought over as well.
Commissions (which are generally pro-copyright and do most of the work) try to circumvent the parliament (which has the final vote and is generally pro-freedom), then the parliament members notice the shenanigans, bitchslap the commissions into place and try to set things straight.
Sometimes the commissions manage to slip something under the radar of parliament, sometimes the parliament passes laws that make some commissions' efforts illegal.I'm pretty sure this treaty was a draft prepared by one of the commissions, which when it hit the parliament, would either be struck down or modified so heavily not a word would go unchanged.
OTOH the commissioners could try to pass it as "pretty much final version just pending a couple signatures, please adapt to this and when the treaty goes live your law will match the requirements of the treaty 100\%".
Of course when the treaty goes live it would be nothing like it was when this proposition was made but the harm has been done.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491158</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1261166400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, I think this is a short term vision. What rich countries need to stay rich is not IP, it is the power to create new and innovative IP. Likewise, a country owning factories is richer than a country owning final goods. IP laws are good for the capitalization of IPs and bad for the creation of IPs. Walt Disney makes more profits from every year's movie they are making than from Donald Duck or Snow White. But protecting those 50+ years old IPs prevent them from being used as raw material for new ones. I honestly believe that even if rich countries were going to be egoistical, they should shorten copyright durations.<br> <br>
Also I am from EU and this move surprises me. EU has been somehow resistant to US-imported copyright lobbyists. The fact that they are the ones weighting in on these issues is disturbing to say the least. I hope our MPs will protest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I think this is a short term vision .
What rich countries need to stay rich is not IP , it is the power to create new and innovative IP .
Likewise , a country owning factories is richer than a country owning final goods .
IP laws are good for the capitalization of IPs and bad for the creation of IPs .
Walt Disney makes more profits from every year 's movie they are making than from Donald Duck or Snow White .
But protecting those 50 + years old IPs prevent them from being used as raw material for new ones .
I honestly believe that even if rich countries were going to be egoistical , they should shorten copyright durations .
Also I am from EU and this move surprises me .
EU has been somehow resistant to US-imported copyright lobbyists .
The fact that they are the ones weighting in on these issues is disturbing to say the least .
I hope our MPs will protest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I think this is a short term vision.
What rich countries need to stay rich is not IP, it is the power to create new and innovative IP.
Likewise, a country owning factories is richer than a country owning final goods.
IP laws are good for the capitalization of IPs and bad for the creation of IPs.
Walt Disney makes more profits from every year's movie they are making than from Donald Duck or Snow White.
But protecting those 50+ years old IPs prevent them from being used as raw material for new ones.
I honestly believe that even if rich countries were going to be egoistical, they should shorten copyright durations.
Also I am from EU and this move surprises me.
EU has been somehow resistant to US-imported copyright lobbyists.
The fact that they are the ones weighting in on these issues is disturbing to say the least.
I hope our MPs will protest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488454</id>
	<title>Re:O Canada</title>
	<author>ubergeek65536</author>
	<datestamp>1261156800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wish I could mod you up.  The Canadian people are supposed to make our laws.  If we don't want your copyright laws too bad for you.  I'd rather live without even seeing another European book or movie in my life then have them make my laws.  Mr. PM are you listening?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish I could mod you up .
The Canadian people are supposed to make our laws .
If we do n't want your copyright laws too bad for you .
I 'd rather live without even seeing another European book or movie in my life then have them make my laws .
Mr. PM are you listening ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish I could mod you up.
The Canadian people are supposed to make our laws.
If we don't want your copyright laws too bad for you.
I'd rather live without even seeing another European book or movie in my life then have them make my laws.
Mr. PM are you listening?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30492780</id>
	<title>Re:Canadians speak up!</title>
	<author>Mashiki</author>
	<datestamp>1261129260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My fellow Canadians...</p><p>Allow me to say you can find <a href="http://webinfo.parl.gc.ca/MembersOfParliament/MainMPsCompleteList.aspx?TimePeriod=Current&amp;Language=E" title="parl.gc.ca"> all your MP's here.</a> [parl.gc.ca]  Once you find your MP for your district please jot down the physical address.  Then write a snail mail letter telling them your opinion and drop it in the mail box.</p><p>In Canada, you don't need postage to write your members of government.  Ever.  Write them.  Tell them your opinion.  Be proactive, it's your write as a voting member.  Do it, or you'll never forgive yourself.  And by the time you've read what I've written.  You could have already had a letter done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My fellow Canadians...Allow me to say you can find all your MP 's here .
[ parl.gc.ca ] Once you find your MP for your district please jot down the physical address .
Then write a snail mail letter telling them your opinion and drop it in the mail box.In Canada , you do n't need postage to write your members of government .
Ever. Write them .
Tell them your opinion .
Be proactive , it 's your write as a voting member .
Do it , or you 'll never forgive yourself .
And by the time you 've read what I 've written .
You could have already had a letter done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My fellow Canadians...Allow me to say you can find  all your MP's here.
[parl.gc.ca]  Once you find your MP for your district please jot down the physical address.
Then write a snail mail letter telling them your opinion and drop it in the mail box.In Canada, you don't need postage to write your members of government.
Ever.  Write them.
Tell them your opinion.
Be proactive, it's your write as a voting member.
Do it, or you'll never forgive yourself.
And by the time you've read what I've written.
You could have already had a letter done.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488586</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488376</id>
	<title>Re:I'm surprised</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1261156560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> and also not that the EU would demand something from Canada.</p> </div><p>I also find that a bit odd. I'm wondering what effects this could have with our Ties in the US. I mean the states secretly want to assimilate us. On occaison a president will ask us to do something, and we'll oblige (Afghanistan) and other times we won't (Iraq).</p><p>So, what would The States think about this proposal, and how will that effect Canada's decision?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and also not that the EU would demand something from Canada .
I also find that a bit odd .
I 'm wondering what effects this could have with our Ties in the US .
I mean the states secretly want to assimilate us .
On occaison a president will ask us to do something , and we 'll oblige ( Afghanistan ) and other times we wo n't ( Iraq ) .So , what would The States think about this proposal , and how will that effect Canada 's decision ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> and also not that the EU would demand something from Canada.
I also find that a bit odd.
I'm wondering what effects this could have with our Ties in the US.
I mean the states secretly want to assimilate us.
On occaison a president will ask us to do something, and we'll oblige (Afghanistan) and other times we won't (Iraq).So, what would The States think about this proposal, and how will that effect Canada's decision?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488212</id>
	<title>Well that's it for that then</title>
	<author>oldspewey</author>
	<datestamp>1261155900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since our current conservative party government thinks leadership is waiting to be told what to do by other countries, I guess Canada can expect EU-style copyright laws shortly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since our current conservative party government thinks leadership is waiting to be told what to do by other countries , I guess Canada can expect EU-style copyright laws shortly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since our current conservative party government thinks leadership is waiting to be told what to do by other countries, I guess Canada can expect EU-style copyright laws shortly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30492594</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sure...</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1261128480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>.. as soon as all of Europe has switched to drinking Blue</i></p><p>They don't really drink that in Canada do they?  I figured it was like Fosters, brewed to American pisswater standards with an import label slapped on it for fake cred.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. as soon as all of Europe has switched to drinking BlueThey do n't really drink that in Canada do they ?
I figured it was like Fosters , brewed to American pisswater standards with an import label slapped on it for fake cred .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. as soon as all of Europe has switched to drinking BlueThey don't really drink that in Canada do they?
I figured it was like Fosters, brewed to American pisswater standards with an import label slapped on it for fake cred.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488600</id>
	<title>As someone from Europe, I say to all Canadians:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261157460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><strong>FUCK THE EU!</strong></p><p>Tell them to GTFO your laws.</p><p>They can&rsquo;d demand shit from you anyway.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Also, be aware, that the EU &ldquo;government&rdquo; is not the people that live in the countries that it thinks it has control over. It&rsquo;s actually pretty much the opposite. They are enemies. A treasonous conspiracy (not in the weirdo meaning, but in the legal meaning), and illegal in pretty much every country, if it weren&rsquo;t for changes in laws that nobody got asked for and nobody wanted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FUCK THE EU ! Tell them to GTFO your laws.They can    d demand shit from you anyway .
: ) Also , be aware , that the EU    government    is not the people that live in the countries that it thinks it has control over .
It    s actually pretty much the opposite .
They are enemies .
A treasonous conspiracy ( not in the weirdo meaning , but in the legal meaning ) , and illegal in pretty much every country , if it weren    t for changes in laws that nobody got asked for and nobody wanted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FUCK THE EU!Tell them to GTFO your laws.They can’d demand shit from you anyway.
:)Also, be aware, that the EU “government” is not the people that live in the countries that it thinks it has control over.
It’s actually pretty much the opposite.
They are enemies.
A treasonous conspiracy (not in the weirdo meaning, but in the legal meaning), and illegal in pretty much every country, if it weren’t for changes in laws that nobody got asked for and nobody wanted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489002</id>
	<title>Re:Just as a Matter of Principal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261159080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It'll be interesting to see just what the Canadian government does with this. On the one hand, our current government loves to suck the industry's cock. On the other hand, our current government hates being told by "outsiders" what to do.</p><p>Time to get some popcorn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'll be interesting to see just what the Canadian government does with this .
On the one hand , our current government loves to suck the industry 's cock .
On the other hand , our current government hates being told by " outsiders " what to do.Time to get some popcorn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'll be interesting to see just what the Canadian government does with this.
On the one hand, our current government loves to suck the industry's cock.
On the other hand, our current government hates being told by "outsiders" what to do.Time to get some popcorn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30493458</id>
	<title>Re:wow...</title>
	<author>Nightspirit</author>
	<datestamp>1261131960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Power is an addiction; the more you taste the more you want.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Power is an addiction ; the more you taste the more you want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Power is an addiction; the more you taste the more you want.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489560</id>
	<title>Re:I hope Canada stands up to this and says NO:</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1261161120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You raise an interesting point. It had never occurred to me that a levy could be imposed on bandwidth - or P2P bandwidth by applying deep-packet inspection. It seems like a logical extension of the blank-media levy. A terrible idea, of course, but one that will probably be on draft legislation. It would have the effect of legalizing pirating by imposing a tax pirates and non-pirates alike, but someone will still think that's it's a good idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You raise an interesting point .
It had never occurred to me that a levy could be imposed on bandwidth - or P2P bandwidth by applying deep-packet inspection .
It seems like a logical extension of the blank-media levy .
A terrible idea , of course , but one that will probably be on draft legislation .
It would have the effect of legalizing pirating by imposing a tax pirates and non-pirates alike , but someone will still think that 's it 's a good idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You raise an interesting point.
It had never occurred to me that a levy could be imposed on bandwidth - or P2P bandwidth by applying deep-packet inspection.
It seems like a logical extension of the blank-media levy.
A terrible idea, of course, but one that will probably be on draft legislation.
It would have the effect of legalizing pirating by imposing a tax pirates and non-pirates alike, but someone will still think that's it's a good idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490444</id>
	<title>Maybe I'm forgetting my Geography, but...</title>
	<author>Afforess</author>
	<datestamp>1261163880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe I don't know the world as well as everyone else (I'm American, can you tell?), but since when is Canada in the EU? Canada should tell them to leave and screw with their own continent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I do n't know the world as well as everyone else ( I 'm American , can you tell ?
) , but since when is Canada in the EU ?
Canada should tell them to leave and screw with their own continent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I don't know the world as well as everyone else (I'm American, can you tell?
), but since when is Canada in the EU?
Canada should tell them to leave and screw with their own continent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488314</id>
	<title>Why not real art?</title>
	<author>tutori</author>
	<datestamp>1261156320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is the fundamental difference between physical art and digital art such that the digital art shouldn't be covered by the first sale doctrine?  As far as I can tell, the only difference is the presence of a lobby...</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is the fundamental difference between physical art and digital art such that the digital art should n't be covered by the first sale doctrine ?
As far as I can tell , the only difference is the presence of a lobby.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is the fundamental difference between physical art and digital art such that the digital art shouldn't be covered by the first sale doctrine?
As far as I can tell, the only difference is the presence of a lobby...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490116</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>Dragonslicer</author>
	<datestamp>1261162800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're confusing unilateral action against another nation with solitary defense from a group of other nations acting against your own nation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're confusing unilateral action against another nation with solitary defense from a group of other nations acting against your own nation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're confusing unilateral action against another nation with solitary defense from a group of other nations acting against your own nation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488478</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>Captain Splendid</author>
	<datestamp>1261156920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You haven't spent a lot of time on Slashdot lately.  Or you fail at strawman arguments.  Pick one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have n't spent a lot of time on Slashdot lately .
Or you fail at strawman arguments .
Pick one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You haven't spent a lot of time on Slashdot lately.
Or you fail at strawman arguments.
Pick one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491086</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sure...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261166160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If by Timmy's you mean Tim Horton's we have some in the Northeastern US.  Now that I'm in Jersey they can't hurry up and get down here fast enough!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If by Timmy 's you mean Tim Horton 's we have some in the Northeastern US .
Now that I 'm in Jersey they ca n't hurry up and get down here fast enough !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If by Timmy's you mean Tim Horton's we have some in the Northeastern US.
Now that I'm in Jersey they can't hurry up and get down here fast enough!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489362</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>BemoanAndMoan</author>
	<datestamp>1261160460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your argument is specious, only because it has to be applied unilaterally as well.  When in recent history has the U.S. and it citizens practiced unilateralism in recent history (besides gestures and possibilities, Obama is still strictly PR).  If you think economic recovery is going to take a long time to recover (thanks again for the guileless leader you let run your country for most of this decade), just wait to see how long it is before the rest of the world forgives his (and by acclamation, your) policies and rhetoric.

</p><p>Swapping carrot for stick doesn't instantly make the donkey forget the stick (yes, world, in this story you are the donkey).

</p><p>And I, as a Canadian, cheerily add a big FU to the EU.  If their interest was even remotely in the artist's interests I'd side with them, but this is just corporate politics flavoured 1984 (thank's to new copyright law, the artists profits have been increased 30\%).

</p><p>----------
</p><p> <em>The only truth is that which you choose to believe.</em></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your argument is specious , only because it has to be applied unilaterally as well .
When in recent history has the U.S. and it citizens practiced unilateralism in recent history ( besides gestures and possibilities , Obama is still strictly PR ) .
If you think economic recovery is going to take a long time to recover ( thanks again for the guileless leader you let run your country for most of this decade ) , just wait to see how long it is before the rest of the world forgives his ( and by acclamation , your ) policies and rhetoric .
Swapping carrot for stick does n't instantly make the donkey forget the stick ( yes , world , in this story you are the donkey ) .
And I , as a Canadian , cheerily add a big FU to the EU .
If their interest was even remotely in the artist 's interests I 'd side with them , but this is just corporate politics flavoured 1984 ( thank 's to new copyright law , the artists profits have been increased 30 \ % ) .
---------- The only truth is that which you choose to believe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your argument is specious, only because it has to be applied unilaterally as well.
When in recent history has the U.S. and it citizens practiced unilateralism in recent history (besides gestures and possibilities, Obama is still strictly PR).
If you think economic recovery is going to take a long time to recover (thanks again for the guileless leader you let run your country for most of this decade), just wait to see how long it is before the rest of the world forgives his (and by acclamation, your) policies and rhetoric.
Swapping carrot for stick doesn't instantly make the donkey forget the stick (yes, world, in this story you are the donkey).
And I, as a Canadian, cheerily add a big FU to the EU.
If their interest was even remotely in the artist's interests I'd side with them, but this is just corporate politics flavoured 1984 (thank's to new copyright law, the artists profits have been increased 30\%).
----------
 The only truth is that which you choose to believe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489262</id>
	<title>Re:Just as a Matter of Principal</title>
	<author>ganktor</author>
	<datestamp>1261159980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I completely agree.
or like the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob\_and\_Doug\_McKenzie" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Mckenzie Bros.</a> [wikipedia.org] - "Take off eh, you hosers!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I completely agree .
or like the Mckenzie Bros. [ wikipedia.org ] - " Take off eh , you hosers !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I completely agree.
or like the Mckenzie Bros. [wikipedia.org] - "Take off eh, you hosers!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490346</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>boudie2</author>
	<datestamp>1261163520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also being a Canadian, I agree wholeheartedly with the thrust of your argument. For now, we'll just have to sit back and wait until the EU
starts fighting amongst themselves as they have for most of the past five hundred years.I'll just satisfy myself by taking another look at Berlusconi
getting cracked in the face. A couple more of them and he'll start to look like a hockey player. The EU is a joke.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also being a Canadian , I agree wholeheartedly with the thrust of your argument .
For now , we 'll just have to sit back and wait until the EU starts fighting amongst themselves as they have for most of the past five hundred years.I 'll just satisfy myself by taking another look at Berlusconi getting cracked in the face .
A couple more of them and he 'll start to look like a hockey player .
The EU is a joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also being a Canadian, I agree wholeheartedly with the thrust of your argument.
For now, we'll just have to sit back and wait until the EU
starts fighting amongst themselves as they have for most of the past five hundred years.I'll just satisfy myself by taking another look at Berlusconi
getting cracked in the face.
A couple more of them and he'll start to look like a hockey player.
The EU is a joke.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489044</id>
	<title>contact them!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261159260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>let them know!</p><p>Delegation of the European Union to Canada</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 150 Metcalfe Street, Suite 1900<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Ottawa, Ontario<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Canada K2P 1P1</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Tel: 613-238-6464<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Fax: 613-238-5191</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; E-mail: Delegation-Canada@ec.europa.eu</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>let them know ! Delegation of the European Union to Canada             150 Metcalfe Street , Suite 1900             Ottawa , Ontario             Canada K2P 1P1             Tel : 613-238-6464             Fax : 613-238-5191             E-mail : Delegation-Canada @ ec.europa.eu</tokentext>
<sentencetext>let them know!Delegation of the European Union to Canada
            150 Metcalfe Street, Suite 1900
            Ottawa, Ontario
            Canada K2P 1P1
            Tel: 613-238-6464
            Fax: 613-238-5191
            E-mail: Delegation-Canada@ec.europa.eu</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488744</id>
	<title>wow...</title>
	<author>pak9rabid</author>
	<datestamp>1261158120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it just me or is the EU starting to sound like the US?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me or is the EU starting to sound like the US ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me or is the EU starting to sound like the US?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491994</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>eggnoglatte</author>
	<datestamp>1261169580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, I'll bite.</p><p>It is not unilateralism for a country to have its own laws. What *is* unilateralism is if one party tries to strongarm another into accepting different rules. So in this case, the EU is the party that is guilty of unilateralism, not Canada. And I say that as an EU citizen.</p><p>The reason the US often gets heat for unilateralism is *not* because the US has their own laws, it is because the US regularly uses their military and economic power to impose their own set of rules onto other countries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , I 'll bite.It is not unilateralism for a country to have its own laws .
What * is * unilateralism is if one party tries to strongarm another into accepting different rules .
So in this case , the EU is the party that is guilty of unilateralism , not Canada .
And I say that as an EU citizen.The reason the US often gets heat for unilateralism is * not * because the US has their own laws , it is because the US regularly uses their military and economic power to impose their own set of rules onto other countries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, I'll bite.It is not unilateralism for a country to have its own laws.
What *is* unilateralism is if one party tries to strongarm another into accepting different rules.
So in this case, the EU is the party that is guilty of unilateralism, not Canada.
And I say that as an EU citizen.The reason the US often gets heat for unilateralism is *not* because the US has their own laws, it is because the US regularly uses their military and economic power to impose their own set of rules onto other countries.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30496338</id>
	<title>ACTA</title>
	<author>Thinboy00</author>
	<datestamp>1261154640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'nuf said (*ducks*).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'nuf said ( * ducks * ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'nuf said (*ducks*).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488842</id>
	<title>This is a real threat.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261158420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forget about the small ragtag bands of Middle Eastern terrorists. They aren't a real threat to freedom and democracy.</p><p>Legislation like this, pushed by supranational organizations, is. It is a far, far bigger threat to everybody's freedom and the democracy of Western nations than any terrorist organization.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget about the small ragtag bands of Middle Eastern terrorists .
They are n't a real threat to freedom and democracy.Legislation like this , pushed by supranational organizations , is .
It is a far , far bigger threat to everybody 's freedom and the democracy of Western nations than any terrorist organization .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget about the small ragtag bands of Middle Eastern terrorists.
They aren't a real threat to freedom and democracy.Legislation like this, pushed by supranational organizations, is.
It is a far, far bigger threat to everybody's freedom and the democracy of Western nations than any terrorist organization.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488720</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1261157940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sweden holds the Presidency of the Council of the EU for the last half year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sweden holds the Presidency of the Council of the EU for the last half year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sweden holds the Presidency of the Council of the EU for the last half year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490200</id>
	<title>Re:I hope Canada stands up to this and says NO:</title>
	<author>Have Brain Will Rent</author>
	<datestamp>1261163040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope so too. And a charge on bandwidth? I believe that has already been suggested so I wouldn't be too surprised to see it appear in legislation in the not too distant future.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope so too .
And a charge on bandwidth ?
I believe that has already been suggested so I would n't be too surprised to see it appear in legislation in the not too distant future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope so too.
And a charge on bandwidth?
I believe that has already been suggested so I wouldn't be too surprised to see it appear in legislation in the not too distant future.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490246</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261163160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Aren't we constantly told that..</p></div></blockquote><p>Told by whom?  If I turn off my spam filter, I'm "constantly told" <em>all sorts</em> of things.   You're basically citing (and disagreeing with) hearsay.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't we constantly told that..Told by whom ?
If I turn off my spam filter , I 'm " constantly told " all sorts of things .
You 're basically citing ( and disagreeing with ) hearsay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't we constantly told that..Told by whom?
If I turn off my spam filter, I'm "constantly told" all sorts of things.
You're basically citing (and disagreeing with) hearsay.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488258</id>
	<title>Jesus H Christ...</title>
	<author>grub</author>
	<datestamp>1261156140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><br>I'm so fucking mad, I just dropped my bag of milk and it burst all over my fucking keyboard.<br> <br>Will be writing my MP immediately.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm so fucking mad , I just dropped my bag of milk and it burst all over my fucking keyboard .
Will be writing my MP immediately .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm so fucking mad, I just dropped my bag of milk and it burst all over my fucking keyboard.
Will be writing my MP immediately.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488416</id>
	<title>Gotta say it...</title>
	<author>LynnwoodRooster</author>
	<datestamp>1261156680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>BLAME CANADA!</htmltext>
<tokenext>BLAME CANADA !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BLAME CANADA!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489048</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261159260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"If you take an individual country the size of Sweden or Canada..."</p><p>I take it you are not from around here.  Around here being the planet earth.</p><p>The approximate size of Canada 3.855 million mi^2.  Compare this to Sweden at 173732 mi^2.</p><p>If we consider one of the largest countries in the world, indeed bigger than some continents, and a country less than 1/22 the size of said country than...  what?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" If you take an individual country the size of Sweden or Canada... " I take it you are not from around here .
Around here being the planet earth.The approximate size of Canada 3.855 million mi ^ 2 .
Compare this to Sweden at 173732 mi ^ 2.If we consider one of the largest countries in the world , indeed bigger than some continents , and a country less than 1/22 the size of said country than... what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"If you take an individual country the size of Sweden or Canada..."I take it you are not from around here.
Around here being the planet earth.The approximate size of Canada 3.855 million mi^2.
Compare this to Sweden at 173732 mi^2.If we consider one of the largest countries in the world, indeed bigger than some continents, and a country less than 1/22 the size of said country than...  what?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30494550</id>
	<title>Re:wow...</title>
	<author>spyfrog</author>
	<datestamp>1261137720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not, it isn't only you. The whole new EU constitution is only meant to make us more like US with a "president" and removal of veto from individual states. Next step is the EU army which is coming - "voluntary" at first...<br>Please don't trust what EU says. We as citizens sure don't trust EU... that is perhaps why no one beside the Irish was allowed to vote on the new treaty - and they voted "no" first time so they had to re-vote to vote "right".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not , it is n't only you .
The whole new EU constitution is only meant to make us more like US with a " president " and removal of veto from individual states .
Next step is the EU army which is coming - " voluntary " at first...Please do n't trust what EU says .
We as citizens sure do n't trust EU... that is perhaps why no one beside the Irish was allowed to vote on the new treaty - and they voted " no " first time so they had to re-vote to vote " right " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not, it isn't only you.
The whole new EU constitution is only meant to make us more like US with a "president" and removal of veto from individual states.
Next step is the EU army which is coming - "voluntary" at first...Please don't trust what EU says.
We as citizens sure don't trust EU... that is perhaps why no one beside the Irish was allowed to vote on the new treaty - and they voted "no" first time so they had to re-vote to vote "right".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30495862</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261149120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>As a Canadian, to all foreign powers who demand we change our laws to match yours, I say fuck you<b>, eh</b>.</p></div></blockquote><p>
FTFY.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a Canadian , to all foreign powers who demand we change our laws to match yours , I say fuck you , eh .
FTFY .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a Canadian, to all foreign powers who demand we change our laws to match yours, I say fuck you, eh.
FTFY.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488374</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>wannabegeek2</author>
	<datestamp>1261156560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm an American, and you cannot conceive of how much I agree with your position!</p><p>Best of luck!</p><p>(Expose and excise Corporatism. Businesses are NOT a component of "The People", at least as the US founding Fathers meant.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm an American , and you can not conceive of how much I agree with your position ! Best of luck !
( Expose and excise Corporatism .
Businesses are NOT a component of " The People " , at least as the US founding Fathers meant .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm an American, and you cannot conceive of how much I agree with your position!Best of luck!
(Expose and excise Corporatism.
Businesses are NOT a component of "The People", at least as the US founding Fathers meant.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488636</id>
	<title>There goes moving to Canada</title>
	<author>wadeal</author>
	<datestamp>1261157640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Was planning to move there from Australia to avoid this soughta shit thats coming in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was planning to move there from Australia to avoid this soughta shit thats coming in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was planning to move there from Australia to avoid this soughta shit thats coming in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488486</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261156980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So is that the fault of Americans or the rest of the world?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So is that the fault of Americans or the rest of the world ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So is that the fault of Americans or the rest of the world?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491062</id>
	<title>Re:As a Canadian...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261166040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You've just destroyed Canada's chance of joining the EU... nice going, eh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've just destroyed Canada 's chance of joining the EU... nice going , eh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've just destroyed Canada's chance of joining the EU... nice going, eh!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491650</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>Zencyde</author>
	<datestamp>1261168500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's an effect here similar to the way centralized and decentralized systems work. A star topology only scales so well. Eventually the beast gets too big to have a head.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's an effect here similar to the way centralized and decentralized systems work .
A star topology only scales so well .
Eventually the beast gets too big to have a head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's an effect here similar to the way centralized and decentralized systems work.
A star topology only scales so well.
Eventually the beast gets too big to have a head.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30494044</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>De Lemming</author>
	<datestamp>1261135080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it wasn't so bad in the EU yet, our rights are certainly deteriorating.  We currently have two Pirate Party members in the European Parliament, we need more of them!  Christian Engstr&#246;m, the first Pirate Party MEP, already <a href="http://christianengstrom.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/new-acta-document-leaked/" title="wordpress.com">spoke out after a previous leak of ACTA documents</a> [wordpress.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it was n't so bad in the EU yet , our rights are certainly deteriorating .
We currently have two Pirate Party members in the European Parliament , we need more of them !
Christian Engstr   m , the first Pirate Party MEP , already spoke out after a previous leak of ACTA documents [ wordpress.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it wasn't so bad in the EU yet, our rights are certainly deteriorating.
We currently have two Pirate Party members in the European Parliament, we need more of them!
Christian Engström, the first Pirate Party MEP, already spoke out after a previous leak of ACTA documents [wordpress.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176</id>
	<title>Cue the apologists...</title>
	<author>HarrySquatter</author>
	<datestamp>1261155780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aren't we constantly told that the EU is so much better in regards to patents and copyrights and it's only the big bad US that is constantly trying to push all this stuff on people?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't we constantly told that the EU is so much better in regards to patents and copyrights and it 's only the big bad US that is constantly trying to push all this stuff on people ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't we constantly told that the EU is so much better in regards to patents and copyrights and it's only the big bad US that is constantly trying to push all this stuff on people?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488266</id>
	<title>As a Canadian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261156140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I politely say, "that's nice". Please take a seat there by the Americans who have made the same demands. we'll see you after them. They've been waiting a few years, so you make want to bring a lunch and something to read.

Really, the government is in a minority position (has been for a few years) and has plenty of real trouble to deal with...  they also want to be elected with a majority some day so they are not apt to piss off the population too much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I politely say , " that 's nice " .
Please take a seat there by the Americans who have made the same demands .
we 'll see you after them .
They 've been waiting a few years , so you make want to bring a lunch and something to read .
Really , the government is in a minority position ( has been for a few years ) and has plenty of real trouble to deal with... they also want to be elected with a majority some day so they are not apt to piss off the population too much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I politely say, "that's nice".
Please take a seat there by the Americans who have made the same demands.
we'll see you after them.
They've been waiting a few years, so you make want to bring a lunch and something to read.
Really, the government is in a minority position (has been for a few years) and has plenty of real trouble to deal with...  they also want to be elected with a majority some day so they are not apt to piss off the population too much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488578</id>
	<title>OK, this is getting old</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261157400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess it is to be expected for <b>every</b><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. article to spiral into at least one anti-American diatribe, but even this one is a stretch.  Mod topic -1 offtopic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess it is to be expected for every / .
article to spiral into at least one anti-American diatribe , but even this one is a stretch .
Mod topic -1 offtopic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess it is to be expected for every /.
article to spiral into at least one anti-American diatribe, but even this one is a stretch.
Mod topic -1 offtopic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489464</id>
	<title>Re:Just as a Matter of Principal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261160760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Technically, the standard Canadian practice is to precede such statements with "Please", such as in a "PFO" letter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Technically , the standard Canadian practice is to precede such statements with " Please " , such as in a " PFO " letter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technically, the standard Canadian practice is to precede such statements with "Please", such as in a "PFO" letter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488166</id>
	<title>Oh no!</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1261155720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was going to make a "Milk Comes in bags!" Joke, but it turns out that joke is now copyrighted!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to make a " Milk Comes in bags !
" Joke , but it turns out that joke is now copyrighted !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to make a "Milk Comes in bags!
" Joke, but it turns out that joke is now copyrighted!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30495862
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30494096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30494550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490140
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30493150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30493078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30493828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30502762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30495086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30496488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30501146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30493458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30505568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30494044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30492780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30492594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30496338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1531216_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488224
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488842
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488454
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489332
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489126
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488692
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30492594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30493828
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490140
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488376
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488274
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30505568
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488600
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30502762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488266
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30492780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488166
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489056
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30495862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488408
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488656
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488628
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489410
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489362
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490116
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30495086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30496488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488374
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488958
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30494550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30493078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30493458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30494096
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488518
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488578
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30494044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488330
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30501146
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488720
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489048
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489614
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490428
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30493150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30496338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488420
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30491358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1531216.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30490088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30488886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1531216.30489092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
