<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_17_1711256</id>
	<title>$300 Sci-Fi YouTube Video Lands $30m Movie Deal</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1261070460000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>krou writes <i>"A producer from Uruguay who made a short science fiction film and uploaded it to YouTube has landed <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8417789.stm">a film deal with Sam Raimi's Ghost House worth $300 million</a>. The film, which shows <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dadPWhEhVk">spaceships and giant robots attacking Montevideo</a>, the capital of Uruguay, was made by Fede Alvarez for around $30. 'I uploaded (<em>Panic Attack!</em>) on a Thursday and on Monday my inbox was totally full of e-mails from Hollywood studios,' he said. Alvarez is to <a href="http://www.cinemaspy.com/article.php?id=3628">develop and direct a film based on one of his ideas</a>, but there is no word yet on the writer."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>krou writes " A producer from Uruguay who made a short science fiction film and uploaded it to YouTube has landed a film deal with Sam Raimi 's Ghost House worth $ 300 million .
The film , which shows spaceships and giant robots attacking Montevideo , the capital of Uruguay , was made by Fede Alvarez for around $ 30 .
'I uploaded ( Panic Attack !
) on a Thursday and on Monday my inbox was totally full of e-mails from Hollywood studios, ' he said .
Alvarez is to develop and direct a film based on one of his ideas , but there is no word yet on the writer .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>krou writes "A producer from Uruguay who made a short science fiction film and uploaded it to YouTube has landed a film deal with Sam Raimi's Ghost House worth $300 million.
The film, which shows spaceships and giant robots attacking Montevideo, the capital of Uruguay, was made by Fede Alvarez for around $30.
'I uploaded (Panic Attack!
) on a Thursday and on Monday my inbox was totally full of e-mails from Hollywood studios,' he said.
Alvarez is to develop and direct a film based on one of his ideas, but there is no word yet on the writer.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480</id>
	<title>About time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261074180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas, and must turn to new sources.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas , and must turn to new sources .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas, and must turn to new sources.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477814</id>
	<title>Re:PR/Viral marketing?</title>
	<author>JaredOfEuropa</author>
	<datestamp>1261082940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure sounds like it.  It sounds a little like one of those Susan Boyle "surprise talent" discoveries, where they pick up someone whose singing/acting/movie editing skills/composing/whatever skills are not that much above average and don't really warrant big-ticket producer attention... except for the fact that they've got a <i>hell</i> of a compelling rags-to-riches story behind them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure sounds like it .
It sounds a little like one of those Susan Boyle " surprise talent " discoveries , where they pick up someone whose singing/acting/movie editing skills/composing/whatever skills are not that much above average and do n't really warrant big-ticket producer attention... except for the fact that they 've got a hell of a compelling rags-to-riches story behind them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure sounds like it.
It sounds a little like one of those Susan Boyle "surprise talent" discoveries, where they pick up someone whose singing/acting/movie editing skills/composing/whatever skills are not that much above average and don't really warrant big-ticket producer attention... except for the fact that they've got a hell of a compelling rags-to-riches story behind them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477318</id>
	<title>Film History</title>
	<author>UnlimitedFreakOut</author>
	<datestamp>1261081200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Love scifi but my eyes did widen when I saw the pram going down the stairs and thought, well at least they know their stuff...

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Battleship\_Potemkin#The\_Odessa\_Steps\_sequence" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Battleship\_Potemkin#The\_Odessa\_Steps\_sequence</a> [wikipedia.org]

good luck to them<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;O)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Love scifi but my eyes did widen when I saw the pram going down the stairs and thought , well at least they know their stuff.. . http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The \ _Battleship \ _Potemkin # The \ _Odessa \ _Steps \ _sequence [ wikipedia.org ] good luck to them ; O )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Love scifi but my eyes did widen when I saw the pram going down the stairs and thought, well at least they know their stuff...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Battleship\_Potemkin#The\_Odessa\_Steps\_sequence [wikipedia.org]

good luck to them ;O)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476674</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261078920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, there's your problem right there.  The "pr0n industry" isn't Hollywood, it's the San Fernando Valley.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , there 's your problem right there .
The " pr0n industry " is n't Hollywood , it 's the San Fernando Valley .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, there's your problem right there.
The "pr0n industry" isn't Hollywood, it's the San Fernando Valley.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475982</id>
	<title>Alvarez Doesn't Get 30M</title>
	<author>mpapet</author>
	<datestamp>1261076340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The project is budgeted at 30M.</p><p>This is Alvarez's first project, probably no agent, definitely no actors attached to it, so they will probably give him an 'advance' and then lots of interdependent if-then conditionals.  He won't get any on-screen credits.  (That sets off a bunch of payouts the producer normally keeps) Then one of two things happen to a first-time writer/creator.</p><p>1. The conditionals are never met.  Alvarez keeps his pittance of an advance and makes a little beer money.  This is normally how it works for a project off the street.<br>2. The producer reinterprets the contract or has some sort of magical contractual difficulty with Alvarez if the project is successful.  Alvarez then might see his five figures after a few rounds in court and 6-figure legal bills.</p><p>Check out the legal wrangling on 'My Big Fat Greek Wedding' as an example.  According to the producer, that was an 'unprofitable' film.  Welcome to business deals in Hollywood.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The project is budgeted at 30M.This is Alvarez 's first project , probably no agent , definitely no actors attached to it , so they will probably give him an 'advance ' and then lots of interdependent if-then conditionals .
He wo n't get any on-screen credits .
( That sets off a bunch of payouts the producer normally keeps ) Then one of two things happen to a first-time writer/creator.1 .
The conditionals are never met .
Alvarez keeps his pittance of an advance and makes a little beer money .
This is normally how it works for a project off the street.2 .
The producer reinterprets the contract or has some sort of magical contractual difficulty with Alvarez if the project is successful .
Alvarez then might see his five figures after a few rounds in court and 6-figure legal bills.Check out the legal wrangling on 'My Big Fat Greek Wedding ' as an example .
According to the producer , that was an 'unprofitable ' film .
Welcome to business deals in Hollywood .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The project is budgeted at 30M.This is Alvarez's first project, probably no agent, definitely no actors attached to it, so they will probably give him an 'advance' and then lots of interdependent if-then conditionals.
He won't get any on-screen credits.
(That sets off a bunch of payouts the producer normally keeps) Then one of two things happen to a first-time writer/creator.1.
The conditionals are never met.
Alvarez keeps his pittance of an advance and makes a little beer money.
This is normally how it works for a project off the street.2.
The producer reinterprets the contract or has some sort of magical contractual difficulty with Alvarez if the project is successful.
Alvarez then might see his five figures after a few rounds in court and 6-figure legal bills.Check out the legal wrangling on 'My Big Fat Greek Wedding' as an example.
According to the producer, that was an 'unprofitable' film.
Welcome to business deals in Hollywood.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475906</id>
	<title>Ohhh! *That* Montevideo!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261075980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'<i>Montevideo, the capital of Uruguay</i>'<br>Thanks for clarifying that.</p><p>Does the article submitter work in movie post-production by any chance?</p><p>This post brought to you from London, England.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'Montevideo , the capital of Uruguay'Thanks for clarifying that.Does the article submitter work in movie post-production by any chance ? This post brought to you from London , England .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Montevideo, the capital of Uruguay'Thanks for clarifying that.Does the article submitter work in movie post-production by any chance?This post brought to you from London, England.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476078</id>
	<title>Seen it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261076760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty damned good for $300.  I got black out drunk and watched cloverfield and independance day consecutively, so I've already seen it via spotty memory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty damned good for $ 300 .
I got black out drunk and watched cloverfield and independance day consecutively , so I 've already seen it via spotty memory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty damned good for $300.
I got black out drunk and watched cloverfield and independance day consecutively, so I've already seen it via spotty memory.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30480388</id>
	<title>Turns out he is a big PR man - check his showreel</title>
	<author>fantomas</author>
	<datestamp>1261049400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Turns out he's a big PR agency guy - makes adverts for Pepsi and the like presumably for national prime time tv, for some sized budget. So it's not so much "young art school student and mates make $300 movie and gets lucky" more like "talented, experienced, well connected ad. movie maker in the media business makes fun film in spare time when he's not directing SFX heavy corporate videos and gets a step up to making feature films". More of a case of media people talking to each other than famous director's teenaged son asking his dad to watch something kewl him and his mates are all watching at school. Check his website showreel.</p><p>But fair play to the man. Still got a bit of a break. Go for it. I am really liking the fact that aliens are landing somewhere other than New York or LA for a change. (if you were aliens I wonder how you'd choose where to land? biggest cities? means Mexico and India have to be in with a shout!).  District 9 had some nice African angles, I'd be interested to see how a Uruguayan angled sci-fi film might look.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Turns out he 's a big PR agency guy - makes adverts for Pepsi and the like presumably for national prime time tv , for some sized budget .
So it 's not so much " young art school student and mates make $ 300 movie and gets lucky " more like " talented , experienced , well connected ad .
movie maker in the media business makes fun film in spare time when he 's not directing SFX heavy corporate videos and gets a step up to making feature films " .
More of a case of media people talking to each other than famous director 's teenaged son asking his dad to watch something kewl him and his mates are all watching at school .
Check his website showreel.But fair play to the man .
Still got a bit of a break .
Go for it .
I am really liking the fact that aliens are landing somewhere other than New York or LA for a change .
( if you were aliens I wonder how you 'd choose where to land ?
biggest cities ?
means Mexico and India have to be in with a shout ! ) .
District 9 had some nice African angles , I 'd be interested to see how a Uruguayan angled sci-fi film might look .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Turns out he's a big PR agency guy - makes adverts for Pepsi and the like presumably for national prime time tv, for some sized budget.
So it's not so much "young art school student and mates make $300 movie and gets lucky" more like "talented, experienced, well connected ad.
movie maker in the media business makes fun film in spare time when he's not directing SFX heavy corporate videos and gets a step up to making feature films".
More of a case of media people talking to each other than famous director's teenaged son asking his dad to watch something kewl him and his mates are all watching at school.
Check his website showreel.But fair play to the man.
Still got a bit of a break.
Go for it.
I am really liking the fact that aliens are landing somewhere other than New York or LA for a change.
(if you were aliens I wonder how you'd choose where to land?
biggest cities?
means Mexico and India have to be in with a shout!).
District 9 had some nice African angles, I'd be interested to see how a Uruguayan angled sci-fi film might look.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475836</id>
	<title>Re:Putting the "Fiction" back in Science Fiction</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261075680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What makes you think they'd give a rat's ass about New York or Tokyo?</p><p>But to answer your question more effectively, when you make a movie you target an audience. A hobbyist would probably aim his audience towards the locality upon which the film is made. (Meaning, if he's in Uruguay, he's going to make a film for Uruguayians).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What makes you think they 'd give a rat 's ass about New York or Tokyo ? But to answer your question more effectively , when you make a movie you target an audience .
A hobbyist would probably aim his audience towards the locality upon which the film is made .
( Meaning , if he 's in Uruguay , he 's going to make a film for Uruguayians ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What makes you think they'd give a rat's ass about New York or Tokyo?But to answer your question more effectively, when you make a movie you target an audience.
A hobbyist would probably aim his audience towards the locality upon which the film is made.
(Meaning, if he's in Uruguay, he's going to make a film for Uruguayians).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478192</id>
	<title>No way this was done for $300</title>
	<author>lidocaineus</author>
	<datestamp>1261040940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I'm not even talking about paying talent.  Let's just say he has a bunch of friends that will do everything (acting, CGI, basic crew work) for free.  This isn't unheard of for something so short.</p><p>The software ALONE to generate CGI on that level is more than $300.  You can't do that kind of work in something like Adobe After Effects or Apple Motion.  Hell, animating something in Photoshop (painful) wouldn't look this good and it still costs more than $300.  This requires something like Shake or IFF stuff... then you have to have the hardware to run it on.</p><p>Also there is NO way the camera he's using is some cheapo point and shoot DV or even HDV cam - the quality and frame rate look almost film like.  I've seen high end DV and HDV cams, all of which are above $300, and they still don't look this good after proper lighting and post-production color matching/tweaking.</p><p>You can do plenty of stuff on shoe string budgets these days but I don't think it's scaled down to QUITE this level yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I 'm not even talking about paying talent .
Let 's just say he has a bunch of friends that will do everything ( acting , CGI , basic crew work ) for free .
This is n't unheard of for something so short.The software ALONE to generate CGI on that level is more than $ 300 .
You ca n't do that kind of work in something like Adobe After Effects or Apple Motion .
Hell , animating something in Photoshop ( painful ) would n't look this good and it still costs more than $ 300 .
This requires something like Shake or IFF stuff... then you have to have the hardware to run it on.Also there is NO way the camera he 's using is some cheapo point and shoot DV or even HDV cam - the quality and frame rate look almost film like .
I 've seen high end DV and HDV cams , all of which are above $ 300 , and they still do n't look this good after proper lighting and post-production color matching/tweaking.You can do plenty of stuff on shoe string budgets these days but I do n't think it 's scaled down to QUITE this level yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I'm not even talking about paying talent.
Let's just say he has a bunch of friends that will do everything (acting, CGI, basic crew work) for free.
This isn't unheard of for something so short.The software ALONE to generate CGI on that level is more than $300.
You can't do that kind of work in something like Adobe After Effects or Apple Motion.
Hell, animating something in Photoshop (painful) wouldn't look this good and it still costs more than $300.
This requires something like Shake or IFF stuff... then you have to have the hardware to run it on.Also there is NO way the camera he's using is some cheapo point and shoot DV or even HDV cam - the quality and frame rate look almost film like.
I've seen high end DV and HDV cams, all of which are above $300, and they still don't look this good after proper lighting and post-production color matching/tweaking.You can do plenty of stuff on shoe string budgets these days but I don't think it's scaled down to QUITE this level yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475612</id>
	<title>Not a new idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261074720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas, and must turn to new sources.</p></div><p>It's not even new - it's "War of the Worlds" and "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow" mixed together.</p><p>The guy did a great job with the special effects, but story wise - meh.</p><p>Golloywierd will throw in some hot chick in short shorts and lots of cleavage and it'll make a few hundred million.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas , and must turn to new sources.It 's not even new - it 's " War of the Worlds " and " Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow " mixed together.The guy did a great job with the special effects , but story wise - meh.Golloywierd will throw in some hot chick in short shorts and lots of cleavage and it 'll make a few hundred million .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas, and must turn to new sources.It's not even new - it's "War of the Worlds" and "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow" mixed together.The guy did a great job with the special effects, but story wise - meh.Golloywierd will throw in some hot chick in short shorts and lots of cleavage and it'll make a few hundred million.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478928</id>
	<title>Seen this before...</title>
	<author>SinGunner</author>
	<datestamp>1261043880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The guy made a cheap, uninteresting version of Casshern in Portugese or Spanish or whatever.  Not impressed...

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kk9fGI90qdM" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kk9fGI90qdM</a> [youtube.com]

Have a robot, ninja, super-evolved zombie cut through a robot with a karate chop and I'll start paying attention.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The guy made a cheap , uninteresting version of Casshern in Portugese or Spanish or whatever .
Not impressed.. . http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = kk9fGI90qdM [ youtube.com ] Have a robot , ninja , super-evolved zombie cut through a robot with a karate chop and I 'll start paying attention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The guy made a cheap, uninteresting version of Casshern in Portugese or Spanish or whatever.
Not impressed...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kk9fGI90qdM [youtube.com]

Have a robot, ninja, super-evolved zombie cut through a robot with a karate chop and I'll start paying attention.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30479478</id>
	<title>Re:$30 million not $300 million</title>
	<author>mypalmike</author>
	<datestamp>1261045740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's $270 million between friends?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's $ 270 million between friends ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's $270 million between friends?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30480458</id>
	<title>Volume to 11</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261049640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The flash BBC Media Center volume goes to 11, that makes my day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The flash BBC Media Center volume goes to 11 , that makes my day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The flash BBC Media Center volume goes to 11, that makes my day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30486916</id>
	<title>Re:PR/Viral marketing?</title>
	<author>192939495969798999</author>
	<datestamp>1261150260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope, you're not the only one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope , you 're not the only one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope, you're not the only one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476542</id>
	<title>Viral advertising</title>
	<author>tomhath</author>
	<datestamp>1261078500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really hate to be so cynical, but this really looks like viral advertising to me. </p><p>The video is kind a clever splice-together of scenes he shot and scenes he copied, but I don't see anything especially original.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really hate to be so cynical , but this really looks like viral advertising to me .
The video is kind a clever splice-together of scenes he shot and scenes he copied , but I do n't see anything especially original .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really hate to be so cynical, but this really looks like viral advertising to me.
The video is kind a clever splice-together of scenes he shot and scenes he copied, but I don't see anything especially original.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476010</id>
	<title>Nice try Slashdot...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261076520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...I'm not going to get Rick rolled...</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I 'm not going to get Rick rolled.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I'm not going to get Rick rolled...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476636</id>
	<title>Beverly Hills 419</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261078800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> "...my inbox was totally full of e-mails from Hollywood studios,"</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Dear Fede Alvarez,</p><p>I am Mr. Dramane Yadi, I work in the Accounts/ Operations Department of a Prime banks here in Hollywood. I actually have an urgent and very confidential business proposal for you. I got your contact from Internet and decided to contact you immediately.<br>On January 10th 1994, An American Oil Consultant/ Contractor with the Societe Ivoirienne De Raffinage (SIR), Mr. George Norman Wesley, made a number time (fixed) deposits valued at US$300,000,000 (Three Hundred Million Nigerian Dollars)...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...my inbox was totally full of e-mails from Hollywood studios , "     Dear Fede Alvarez,I am Mr. Dramane Yadi , I work in the Accounts/ Operations Department of a Prime banks here in Hollywood .
I actually have an urgent and very confidential business proposal for you .
I got your contact from Internet and decided to contact you immediately.On January 10th 1994 , An American Oil Consultant/ Contractor with the Societe Ivoirienne De Raffinage ( SIR ) , Mr. George Norman Wesley , made a number time ( fixed ) deposits valued at US $ 300,000,000 ( Three Hundred Million Nigerian Dollars ) .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "...my inbox was totally full of e-mails from Hollywood studios,"
    Dear Fede Alvarez,I am Mr. Dramane Yadi, I work in the Accounts/ Operations Department of a Prime banks here in Hollywood.
I actually have an urgent and very confidential business proposal for you.
I got your contact from Internet and decided to contact you immediately.On January 10th 1994, An American Oil Consultant/ Contractor with the Societe Ivoirienne De Raffinage (SIR), Mr. George Norman Wesley, made a number time (fixed) deposits valued at US$300,000,000 (Three Hundred Million Nigerian Dollars)...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476990</id>
	<title>Re:Putting the "Fiction" back in Science Fiction</title>
	<author>bdwoolman</author>
	<datestamp>1261080000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> No offense intended to the great nation of Uruguay, but why would giant robotic aliens give a rat's ass about Montevideo of all places?</p></div> </blockquote><p>

Aliens might not look at the world from our narrow perspective. Maybe they are looking for some kind of secret Nazi stuff hidden there by an &#233;migr&#233; Nazi fugitive genius type who was really an alien. Maybe Hitler was really an evil alien and he is still there. (Some conspiracists thought he was down that way for years.) Good plot fodder... Nazis. </p><p>Remember "The Boys From Brazil?" Anyway, IMHO it seems more interesting than them attacking Washington DC <b>again</b>. Unless Tim Burton has them do it, of course. In that case it's cool. </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No offense intended to the great nation of Uruguay , but why would giant robotic aliens give a rat 's ass about Montevideo of all places ?
Aliens might not look at the world from our narrow perspective .
Maybe they are looking for some kind of secret Nazi stuff hidden there by an   migr   Nazi fugitive genius type who was really an alien .
Maybe Hitler was really an evil alien and he is still there .
( Some conspiracists thought he was down that way for years .
) Good plot fodder... Nazis. Remember " The Boys From Brazil ?
" Anyway , IMHO it seems more interesting than them attacking Washington DC again .
Unless Tim Burton has them do it , of course .
In that case it 's cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> No offense intended to the great nation of Uruguay, but why would giant robotic aliens give a rat's ass about Montevideo of all places?
Aliens might not look at the world from our narrow perspective.
Maybe they are looking for some kind of secret Nazi stuff hidden there by an émigré Nazi fugitive genius type who was really an alien.
Maybe Hitler was really an evil alien and he is still there.
(Some conspiracists thought he was down that way for years.
) Good plot fodder... Nazis. Remember "The Boys From Brazil?
" Anyway, IMHO it seems more interesting than them attacking Washington DC again.
Unless Tim Burton has them do it, of course.
In that case it's cool. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476136</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1261077060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see how this sort of thing isn't a positive development.  The filmmaker who made this short is obviously talented.  It's not just that the special effects are impressive for such a small budget, but the whole thing is shot pretty well.
</p><p>I mean, this is kind of what should be happening, right?  The movie industry finds talented filmmakers and gives them a chance to work on bigger projects?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see how this sort of thing is n't a positive development .
The filmmaker who made this short is obviously talented .
It 's not just that the special effects are impressive for such a small budget , but the whole thing is shot pretty well .
I mean , this is kind of what should be happening , right ?
The movie industry finds talented filmmakers and gives them a chance to work on bigger projects ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see how this sort of thing isn't a positive development.
The filmmaker who made this short is obviously talented.
It's not just that the special effects are impressive for such a small budget, but the whole thing is shot pretty well.
I mean, this is kind of what should be happening, right?
The movie industry finds talented filmmakers and gives them a chance to work on bigger projects?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476086</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1261076820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eh.. there's really no new ideas in the YouTube clip.  If anything, it's a remake of every other urban destruction movie, but the quality is at least on par with big-budget TV effects.  Of course, I'm not sure what Hollywood is expecting from him... there's a big difference between producing your own digital video, and herding a bunch of catty actors while trying to supervise the CGI artists, camera men, editors, etc. and still effectively conveying the story.  Someone <i>else's</i> story no less, according to TFA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eh.. there 's really no new ideas in the YouTube clip .
If anything , it 's a remake of every other urban destruction movie , but the quality is at least on par with big-budget TV effects .
Of course , I 'm not sure what Hollywood is expecting from him... there 's a big difference between producing your own digital video , and herding a bunch of catty actors while trying to supervise the CGI artists , camera men , editors , etc .
and still effectively conveying the story .
Someone else 's story no less , according to TFA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eh.. there's really no new ideas in the YouTube clip.
If anything, it's a remake of every other urban destruction movie, but the quality is at least on par with big-budget TV effects.
Of course, I'm not sure what Hollywood is expecting from him... there's a big difference between producing your own digital video, and herding a bunch of catty actors while trying to supervise the CGI artists, camera men, editors, etc.
and still effectively conveying the story.
Someone else's story no less, according to TFA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476478</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261078260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas, and must turn to new sources.</p></div><p>Oh yeah, I like this new "giant monster/robot/aliens/artifact attacks city, while destroying landmarks in a cool way" idea. It's amazing no one has made a movie about it yet.</p><p>I'm pretty sure they didn't hire the guy to write scripts for them. He's instead very talented in vfx/direction/photography (and I wish him all the luck and success!), and by the way, the reason everyone flocks to this kind of people now is because of District 9. Hollywood likes to try and replicate success based on superficial features they detect in other successful project.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas , and must turn to new sources.Oh yeah , I like this new " giant monster/robot/aliens/artifact attacks city , while destroying landmarks in a cool way " idea .
It 's amazing no one has made a movie about it yet.I 'm pretty sure they did n't hire the guy to write scripts for them .
He 's instead very talented in vfx/direction/photography ( and I wish him all the luck and success !
) , and by the way , the reason everyone flocks to this kind of people now is because of District 9 .
Hollywood likes to try and replicate success based on superficial features they detect in other successful project .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas, and must turn to new sources.Oh yeah, I like this new "giant monster/robot/aliens/artifact attacks city, while destroying landmarks in a cool way" idea.
It's amazing no one has made a movie about it yet.I'm pretty sure they didn't hire the guy to write scripts for them.
He's instead very talented in vfx/direction/photography (and I wish him all the luck and success!
), and by the way, the reason everyone flocks to this kind of people now is because of District 9.
Hollywood likes to try and replicate success based on superficial features they detect in other successful project.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475854</id>
	<title>Impressive for the budget it was done on</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261075680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but it's not something I'd go and see. Alien invaders. Ho hum. Lots of stuff blowing up. Yawn. It feels like I've already seen it about a thousand times already.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...but it 's not something I 'd go and see .
Alien invaders .
Ho hum .
Lots of stuff blowing up .
Yawn. It feels like I 've already seen it about a thousand times already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but it's not something I'd go and see.
Alien invaders.
Ho hum.
Lots of stuff blowing up.
Yawn. It feels like I've already seen it about a thousand times already.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476104</id>
	<title>Hope he gets his original money out</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1261076880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With all the hollywood accounting, I hope he at least makes his original 100USD. But most likely he won't get anything and with a bit of bad luck, he ends up loosing money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With all the hollywood accounting , I hope he at least makes his original 100USD .
But most likely he wo n't get anything and with a bit of bad luck , he ends up loosing money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With all the hollywood accounting, I hope he at least makes his original 100USD.
But most likely he won't get anything and with a bit of bad luck, he ends up loosing money.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478434</id>
	<title>I hate the internet ( and you ) and slashot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261042020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF?  All of these comments and not one person has discussed *HOW* he did it?  This is fucking slashdot! You people are supposed to be engineers, scientists and geeks.  You are supposed to care about the how and not so much about the why.</p><p>Something is broken.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF ?
All of these comments and not one person has discussed * HOW * he did it ?
This is fucking slashdot !
You people are supposed to be engineers , scientists and geeks .
You are supposed to care about the how and not so much about the why.Something is broken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF?
All of these comments and not one person has discussed *HOW* he did it?
This is fucking slashdot!
You people are supposed to be engineers, scientists and geeks.
You are supposed to care about the how and not so much about the why.Something is broken.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476842</id>
	<title>Re:Alvarez Doesn't Get 30M</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261079460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is basically what Ghost House did to the Peng brothers on <em>The Messengers</em>.  They were off the show once the cameras stopped rolling, and the company hired a ghost director to finish the film.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The producer reinterprets the contract or has some sort of magical contractual difficulty with Alvarez if the project is successful.</p></div><p>That won't happen.  If Alvarez has a remotely competent agent he'll push for gross points or none at all, which are a cut of the box office before any expenses.  Actors and directors learned their lesson from the recording industry years ago and it's pretty common knowledge that a deal net of expenses is worthless.  They'll probably pay this guy half a mil and he'll think he won the lottery.</p><p>The studios aren't hiring these people because they have good ideas, or even necessarily because they're cheap.  They're hiring them because they're small fry and will take orders from their producers.  I've seen it happen over and over again; over the past decade we've seen a serious decline in the authority of directors in favor of producers and executives.  Take a look at the "In Production" section of Variety or HR lately-- literally dozens of projects in the $30-$100 M range are going right now with a director that has credits as nothing more than a "stunt coordinator" or "second unit director" or a resume in commercial/music videos.  These people are hired because they won't cause trouble when the producer wants to completely rewrite the story, and can be fired with little fanfare.

</p><p>Posting anonymously, SHA1=286a7b5156f6ccc3309fb7da511b3f03d5cf77d9</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is basically what Ghost House did to the Peng brothers on The Messengers .
They were off the show once the cameras stopped rolling , and the company hired a ghost director to finish the film.The producer reinterprets the contract or has some sort of magical contractual difficulty with Alvarez if the project is successful.That wo n't happen .
If Alvarez has a remotely competent agent he 'll push for gross points or none at all , which are a cut of the box office before any expenses .
Actors and directors learned their lesson from the recording industry years ago and it 's pretty common knowledge that a deal net of expenses is worthless .
They 'll probably pay this guy half a mil and he 'll think he won the lottery.The studios are n't hiring these people because they have good ideas , or even necessarily because they 're cheap .
They 're hiring them because they 're small fry and will take orders from their producers .
I 've seen it happen over and over again ; over the past decade we 've seen a serious decline in the authority of directors in favor of producers and executives .
Take a look at the " In Production " section of Variety or HR lately-- literally dozens of projects in the $ 30- $ 100 M range are going right now with a director that has credits as nothing more than a " stunt coordinator " or " second unit director " or a resume in commercial/music videos .
These people are hired because they wo n't cause trouble when the producer wants to completely rewrite the story , and can be fired with little fanfare .
Posting anonymously , SHA1 = 286a7b5156f6ccc3309fb7da511b3f03d5cf77d9</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is basically what Ghost House did to the Peng brothers on The Messengers.
They were off the show once the cameras stopped rolling, and the company hired a ghost director to finish the film.The producer reinterprets the contract or has some sort of magical contractual difficulty with Alvarez if the project is successful.That won't happen.
If Alvarez has a remotely competent agent he'll push for gross points or none at all, which are a cut of the box office before any expenses.
Actors and directors learned their lesson from the recording industry years ago and it's pretty common knowledge that a deal net of expenses is worthless.
They'll probably pay this guy half a mil and he'll think he won the lottery.The studios aren't hiring these people because they have good ideas, or even necessarily because they're cheap.
They're hiring them because they're small fry and will take orders from their producers.
I've seen it happen over and over again; over the past decade we've seen a serious decline in the authority of directors in favor of producers and executives.
Take a look at the "In Production" section of Variety or HR lately-- literally dozens of projects in the $30-$100 M range are going right now with a director that has credits as nothing more than a "stunt coordinator" or "second unit director" or a resume in commercial/music videos.
These people are hired because they won't cause trouble when the producer wants to completely rewrite the story, and can be fired with little fanfare.
Posting anonymously, SHA1=286a7b5156f6ccc3309fb7da511b3f03d5cf77d9
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475970</id>
	<title>PR/Viral marketing?</title>
	<author>djwavelength</author>
	<datestamp>1261076280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I the only one who thinks that the whole situation was setup as a viral marketing/PR stunt? Maybe I'm just naturally distrustful of Hollywood.</p><p>It is easier to sell tickets to another run of the mill Sci-Fi movie if it has a story like this behind it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one who thinks that the whole situation was setup as a viral marketing/PR stunt ?
Maybe I 'm just naturally distrustful of Hollywood.It is easier to sell tickets to another run of the mill Sci-Fi movie if it has a story like this behind it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one who thinks that the whole situation was setup as a viral marketing/PR stunt?
Maybe I'm just naturally distrustful of Hollywood.It is easier to sell tickets to another run of the mill Sci-Fi movie if it has a story like this behind it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477728</id>
	<title>You are missing the point</title>
	<author>alkalinelito</author>
	<datestamp>1261082640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It doesn't matter if it crappy or not, or if it has a story or not, etc

The point was to watch our city being destroyed by aliens/robots or whatever they are.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't matter if it crappy or not , or if it has a story or not , etc The point was to watch our city being destroyed by aliens/robots or whatever they are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't matter if it crappy or not, or if it has a story or not, etc

The point was to watch our city being destroyed by aliens/robots or whatever they are.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478640</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>arose</author>
	<datestamp>1261042800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To be fair, the $300 probably doesn't include the time he put into it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair , the $ 300 probably does n't include the time he put into it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair, the $300 probably doesn't include the time he put into it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476760</id>
	<title>Why no support for a low budget phillipino horror</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261079160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>movie? Shows it is better to post in youtube than to pimp your movie project in slashdot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>movie ?
Shows it is better to post in youtube than to pimp your movie project in slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>movie?
Shows it is better to post in youtube than to pimp your movie project in slashdot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476220</id>
	<title>Re:What did Raimi see in this guy?</title>
	<author>jimicus</author>
	<datestamp>1261077300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Even there, anyone can see that if you used the proper accounting methods, the budget was probaly way more than $300.</p></div><p>Since when did anything involving movies ever use proper accounting methods?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even there , anyone can see that if you used the proper accounting methods , the budget was probaly way more than $ 300.Since when did anything involving movies ever use proper accounting methods ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even there, anyone can see that if you used the proper accounting methods, the budget was probaly way more than $300.Since when did anything involving movies ever use proper accounting methods?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476416</id>
	<title>Re:Alvarez Doesn't Get 30M</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1261078020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Check out the legal wrangling on 'My Big Fat Greek Wedding' as an example. According to the producer, that was an 'unprofitable' film. Welcome to business deals in Hollywood.</p></div><p>Forest Gump still lost money. Unprofitable blockbuster, so sad. Don't know how that could possibly happen, wink nudge etc.</p><p>The dropping of barriers to entry is the key. You don't need to get into Blockbuster, netflix is fine. You don't need to get into the theaters, netflix I'm sure will eventually start streaming first-run movies. And with digital distribution, maybe the theaters will start scheduling one-off nights. A physical print is like $17k and only has a limited number of runs before it deteriorates. With the theaters going completely digital, they could have a hundred movies on-hand to run in any of their theaters and can set a theater from one to the other at the press of a button.</p><p>I'll be just as happy to see the wheeler-dealers fucked to death with their own severed cocks. The world has no need for them other than compost.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Check out the legal wrangling on 'My Big Fat Greek Wedding ' as an example .
According to the producer , that was an 'unprofitable ' film .
Welcome to business deals in Hollywood.Forest Gump still lost money .
Unprofitable blockbuster , so sad .
Do n't know how that could possibly happen , wink nudge etc.The dropping of barriers to entry is the key .
You do n't need to get into Blockbuster , netflix is fine .
You do n't need to get into the theaters , netflix I 'm sure will eventually start streaming first-run movies .
And with digital distribution , maybe the theaters will start scheduling one-off nights .
A physical print is like $ 17k and only has a limited number of runs before it deteriorates .
With the theaters going completely digital , they could have a hundred movies on-hand to run in any of their theaters and can set a theater from one to the other at the press of a button.I 'll be just as happy to see the wheeler-dealers fucked to death with their own severed cocks .
The world has no need for them other than compost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check out the legal wrangling on 'My Big Fat Greek Wedding' as an example.
According to the producer, that was an 'unprofitable' film.
Welcome to business deals in Hollywood.Forest Gump still lost money.
Unprofitable blockbuster, so sad.
Don't know how that could possibly happen, wink nudge etc.The dropping of barriers to entry is the key.
You don't need to get into Blockbuster, netflix is fine.
You don't need to get into the theaters, netflix I'm sure will eventually start streaming first-run movies.
And with digital distribution, maybe the theaters will start scheduling one-off nights.
A physical print is like $17k and only has a limited number of runs before it deteriorates.
With the theaters going completely digital, they could have a hundred movies on-hand to run in any of their theaters and can set a theater from one to the other at the press of a button.I'll be just as happy to see the wheeler-dealers fucked to death with their own severed cocks.
The world has no need for them other than compost.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476682</id>
	<title>It's Over, Hollywood Is Finished -</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261078920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's pretty telling that a $300 budget can deliver CGI of equivalent quality to G.I. Joe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's pretty telling that a $ 300 budget can deliver CGI of equivalent quality to G.I .
Joe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's pretty telling that a $300 budget can deliver CGI of equivalent quality to G.I.
Joe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30479958</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>adamofgreyskull</author>
	<datestamp>1261047660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cloverfield had an estimated budget of $30 million and grossed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloverfield#Reception" title="wikipedia.org">$170,602,318</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cloverfield had an estimated budget of $ 30 million and grossed $ 170,602,318 [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cloverfield had an estimated budget of $30 million and grossed $170,602,318 [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476110</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477718</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>Critical Facilities</author>
	<datestamp>1261082580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>this is just an example of it becoming easier for smaller artists/designers/producers etc to be able to show themselves on the world stage, nothing more.</p></div><p>I agree with that.<br> <br>Yo Fede,  if you need a <a href="http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID=701753&amp;content=music" title="soundclick.com">composer</a> [soundclick.com],  I promise I wouldn't take up too much of your $30MM budget.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>this is just an example of it becoming easier for smaller artists/designers/producers etc to be able to show themselves on the world stage , nothing more.I agree with that .
Yo Fede , if you need a composer [ soundclick.com ] , I promise I would n't take up too much of your $ 30MM budget .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is just an example of it becoming easier for smaller artists/designers/producers etc to be able to show themselves on the world stage, nothing more.I agree with that.
Yo Fede,  if you need a composer [soundclick.com],  I promise I wouldn't take up too much of your $30MM budget.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475946</id>
	<title>Sky captain?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261076160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So rip off the start of sky captain - add in better fx ( it was made 5 years ago) and gain a$30 mill contract.</p><p>Sky captain still wins though...it had airships!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So rip off the start of sky captain - add in better fx ( it was made 5 years ago ) and gain a $ 30 mill contract.Sky captain still wins though...it had airships !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So rip off the start of sky captain - add in better fx ( it was made 5 years ago) and gain a$30 mill contract.Sky captain still wins though...it had airships!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30487462</id>
	<title>Very cool techniques..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261153020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's very cool. But we know the story now.</p><p>(I guess most Hollywood movies condense into something about that short though)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's very cool .
But we know the story now .
( I guess most Hollywood movies condense into something about that short though )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's very cool.
But we know the story now.
(I guess most Hollywood movies condense into something about that short though)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30479876</id>
	<title>Worked for District 9</title>
	<author>mac1235</author>
	<datestamp>1261047240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Neil Blomkamp rocks!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Neil Blomkamp rocks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Neil Blomkamp rocks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478326</id>
	<title>Re:Not a new idea</title>
	<author>nacturation</author>
	<datestamp>1261041540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The guy did a great job with the special effects, but story wise - meh.  Golloywierd will throw in some hot chick in short shorts and lots of cleavage and it'll make a few hundred million.</p></div><p>I thought it showed a lot of potential when the robots hunkered down and shielded themselves.  Rather than subsequently explode, that could have made an interesting "WTF are they doing?" plot point which could have been expanded upon.  I don't have any unique ideas in this regards, but things that have been done before would include "only certain people allowed in", "Earth preservation for your own good", and so on.  As soon as it exploded though, yeah... definitely a meh story.  They could have nuked it from orbit, just to be sure.</p><p>But hey... cast Milla Jovovich and I might go see it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The guy did a great job with the special effects , but story wise - meh .
Golloywierd will throw in some hot chick in short shorts and lots of cleavage and it 'll make a few hundred million.I thought it showed a lot of potential when the robots hunkered down and shielded themselves .
Rather than subsequently explode , that could have made an interesting " WTF are they doing ?
" plot point which could have been expanded upon .
I do n't have any unique ideas in this regards , but things that have been done before would include " only certain people allowed in " , " Earth preservation for your own good " , and so on .
As soon as it exploded though , yeah... definitely a meh story .
They could have nuked it from orbit , just to be sure.But hey... cast Milla Jovovich and I might go see it .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The guy did a great job with the special effects, but story wise - meh.
Golloywierd will throw in some hot chick in short shorts and lots of cleavage and it'll make a few hundred million.I thought it showed a lot of potential when the robots hunkered down and shielded themselves.
Rather than subsequently explode, that could have made an interesting "WTF are they doing?
" plot point which could have been expanded upon.
I don't have any unique ideas in this regards, but things that have been done before would include "only certain people allowed in", "Earth preservation for your own good", and so on.
As soon as it exploded though, yeah... definitely a meh story.
They could have nuked it from orbit, just to be sure.But hey... cast Milla Jovovich and I might go see it.
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476012</id>
	<title>Re:Putting the "Fiction" back in Science Fiction</title>
	<author>ae1294</author>
	<datestamp>1261076580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No offense intended to the great nation of Uruguay, but why would giant robotic aliens give a rat's ass about Montevideo of all places?</p></div><p>They've been intercepting our interwebs for some time now and as such they've been watching porn from 8thstreetlatinas.net. Like most gigantic robotic overlords they require fresh, nimble, "barely legal" workers for their Energon mines in order to continue to function properly and thus continue to watch even more porn as well as do all those other things that overlords do. Pass pointless laws, monitor the pleebs, protect the children, make deals with other alien overlords, etc.</p><p>I know this because I too am a slave of the robotic overlords however, I work in accounting...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No offense intended to the great nation of Uruguay , but why would giant robotic aliens give a rat 's ass about Montevideo of all places ? They 've been intercepting our interwebs for some time now and as such they 've been watching porn from 8thstreetlatinas.net .
Like most gigantic robotic overlords they require fresh , nimble , " barely legal " workers for their Energon mines in order to continue to function properly and thus continue to watch even more porn as well as do all those other things that overlords do .
Pass pointless laws , monitor the pleebs , protect the children , make deals with other alien overlords , etc.I know this because I too am a slave of the robotic overlords however , I work in accounting.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No offense intended to the great nation of Uruguay, but why would giant robotic aliens give a rat's ass about Montevideo of all places?They've been intercepting our interwebs for some time now and as such they've been watching porn from 8thstreetlatinas.net.
Like most gigantic robotic overlords they require fresh, nimble, "barely legal" workers for their Energon mines in order to continue to function properly and thus continue to watch even more porn as well as do all those other things that overlords do.
Pass pointless laws, monitor the pleebs, protect the children, make deals with other alien overlords, etc.I know this because I too am a slave of the robotic overlords however, I work in accounting...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476710</id>
	<title>The music is from 28 days later</title>
	<author>mxh83</author>
	<datestamp>1261078980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It uses the same music as 28 days later? <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6x\_ovbbXHMY" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6x\_ovbbXHMY</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>It uses the same music as 28 days later ?
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 6x \ _ovbbXHMY [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It uses the same music as 28 days later?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6x\_ovbbXHMY [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475804</id>
	<title>To his credit...</title>
	<author>KingSkippus</author>
	<datestamp>1261075560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To his credit, the plot of the YouTube video was a lot more interesting than around 80\% of the movies that Hollywood does churn out these days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To his credit , the plot of the YouTube video was a lot more interesting than around 80 \ % of the movies that Hollywood does churn out these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To his credit, the plot of the YouTube video was a lot more interesting than around 80\% of the movies that Hollywood does churn out these days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30483780</id>
	<title>Re:Are there any Uraguayans here?</title>
	<author>El\_Isma</author>
	<datestamp>1261073100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes there are Uruguayans. But sorry to tell you, that movie actually says "Paraguayans" (or at least, that's what I hear<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P ).<br>Thanks to the other poster for the youtube link!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes there are Uruguayans .
But sorry to tell you , that movie actually says " Paraguayans " ( or at least , that 's what I hear : P ) .Thanks to the other poster for the youtube link !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes there are Uruguayans.
But sorry to tell you, that movie actually says "Paraguayans" (or at least, that's what I hear :P ).Thanks to the other poster for the youtube link!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481262</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>PylonHead</author>
	<datestamp>1261054080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're a fan of Michael Bay then it's a positive development.  If you're not, then it's pretty much a non-event.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're a fan of Michael Bay then it 's a positive development .
If you 're not , then it 's pretty much a non-event .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're a fan of Michael Bay then it's a positive development.
If you're not, then it's pretty much a non-event.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476284</id>
	<title>What about Shane Carruth?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261077540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Primer was one of the best sci-fi movies I've ever seen, on a budget of $7,000. It's about damn time that guy gets the funding he needs to bring his other ideas to fruition.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Primer was one of the best sci-fi movies I 've ever seen , on a budget of $ 7,000 .
It 's about damn time that guy gets the funding he needs to bring his other ideas to fruition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Primer was one of the best sci-fi movies I've ever seen, on a budget of $7,000.
It's about damn time that guy gets the funding he needs to bring his other ideas to fruition.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476700</id>
	<title>another movie</title>
	<author>zmooc</author>
	<datestamp>1261078980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think there are many much better special-fx based movies. Some even have somewhat of a story!:P Personally, I like the one below a lot, but that may be because it was recorded where I live;-) Anyway, it's a lot more entertaining than the video the story is about.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IU\_reTt7Hj4" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IU\_reTt7Hj4</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think there are many much better special-fx based movies .
Some even have somewhat of a story !
: P Personally , I like the one below a lot , but that may be because it was recorded where I live ; - ) Anyway , it 's a lot more entertaining than the video the story is about.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = IU \ _reTt7Hj4 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think there are many much better special-fx based movies.
Some even have somewhat of a story!
:P Personally, I like the one below a lot, but that may be because it was recorded where I live;-) Anyway, it's a lot more entertaining than the video the story is about.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IU\_reTt7Hj4 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476550</id>
	<title>soundtrack rip off?</title>
	<author>tomp1000</author>
	<datestamp>1261078500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>this film was interesting to watch and would most likley make a decent film if the studio doesnt wreck it

but what worries me is the soundtrack has been blatentley copied from '28 Days Later' and does add eerieness to the atmopshere, so shouldn't danny boyle, or whoever owns the rights to the music be sueing this guy if hes just been offered a $300 million movie deal?</htmltext>
<tokenext>this film was interesting to watch and would most likley make a decent film if the studio doesnt wreck it but what worries me is the soundtrack has been blatentley copied from '28 Days Later ' and does add eerieness to the atmopshere , so should n't danny boyle , or whoever owns the rights to the music be sueing this guy if hes just been offered a $ 300 million movie deal ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this film was interesting to watch and would most likley make a decent film if the studio doesnt wreck it

but what worries me is the soundtrack has been blatentley copied from '28 Days Later' and does add eerieness to the atmopshere, so shouldn't danny boyle, or whoever owns the rights to the music be sueing this guy if hes just been offered a $300 million movie deal?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475516</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1261074300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>First hint that Hollywood is turning to new sources.
<p>
I hate it when robots attack Montevideo.  Especially during soccer season.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First hint that Hollywood is turning to new sources .
I hate it when robots attack Montevideo .
Especially during soccer season .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First hint that Hollywood is turning to new sources.
I hate it when robots attack Montevideo.
Especially during soccer season.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30490814</id>
	<title>Summary  title - powers of ten</title>
	<author>Krioni</author>
	<datestamp>1261165140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, is it a $300 video gets a $30 million deal, like the title, or a $30 video gets a $300 million movie deal?</p><p>Based on the comments from people who appear to have RTFA, it seems the title is correct: $300 / $30 million. I sure hope whoever wrote that summary is working in entertainment and not engineering. Hollywood gets things wrong by a factor of ten all the time and no one dies, right? </p><p>[ Come on, that's a softball - someone post a good response. ]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , is it a $ 300 video gets a $ 30 million deal , like the title , or a $ 30 video gets a $ 300 million movie deal ? Based on the comments from people who appear to have RTFA , it seems the title is correct : $ 300 / $ 30 million .
I sure hope whoever wrote that summary is working in entertainment and not engineering .
Hollywood gets things wrong by a factor of ten all the time and no one dies , right ?
[ Come on , that 's a softball - someone post a good response .
]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, is it a $300 video gets a $30 million deal, like the title, or a $30 video gets a $300 million movie deal?Based on the comments from people who appear to have RTFA, it seems the title is correct: $300 / $30 million.
I sure hope whoever wrote that summary is working in entertainment and not engineering.
Hollywood gets things wrong by a factor of ten all the time and no one dies, right?
[ Come on, that's a softball - someone post a good response.
]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476110</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>alexhard</author>
	<datestamp>1261076940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A cgi bonanza with an annoying shakeycam and no acting. Truly original, and exactly what Hollywood needs to renew itself!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A cgi bonanza with an annoying shakeycam and no acting .
Truly original , and exactly what Hollywood needs to renew itself !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A cgi bonanza with an annoying shakeycam and no acting.
Truly original, and exactly what Hollywood needs to renew itself!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476840</id>
	<title>Re:Putting the "Fiction" back in Science Fiction</title>
	<author>nametaken</author>
	<datestamp>1261079460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear Sir,</p><p>I'm Mr. Finkelstein of Megalith Studios, and we've decided that you're the perfect person to write a script for our new bajillion dollar robot invasion film.  This job pays roughly $8/hr.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear Sir,I 'm Mr. Finkelstein of Megalith Studios , and we 've decided that you 're the perfect person to write a script for our new bajillion dollar robot invasion film .
This job pays roughly $ 8/hr .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear Sir,I'm Mr. Finkelstein of Megalith Studios, and we've decided that you're the perfect person to write a script for our new bajillion dollar robot invasion film.
This job pays roughly $8/hr.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476124</id>
	<title>300 bucks cant have licensed that OST</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261077000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shouldn't youtube silence the vid? Plenty other vids get silenced for using copyrighted music, and this one obviously i've heard before. PRobably in 28 weeks later. not sure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't youtube silence the vid ?
Plenty other vids get silenced for using copyrighted music , and this one obviously i 've heard before .
PRobably in 28 weeks later .
not sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't youtube silence the vid?
Plenty other vids get silenced for using copyrighted music, and this one obviously i've heard before.
PRobably in 28 weeks later.
not sure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30480916</id>
	<title>Viral Marketing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261052040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every bet, that the Raimi deal was negotiated beforehand and this small movie (which scriptwise isn't very good) is only part of a viral marketing strategy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every bet , that the Raimi deal was negotiated beforehand and this small movie ( which scriptwise is n't very good ) is only part of a viral marketing strategy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every bet, that the Raimi deal was negotiated beforehand and this small movie (which scriptwise isn't very good) is only part of a viral marketing strategy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476054</id>
	<title>That sucks on so many levels</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261076700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sucky list<br>1. Music is stolen (28 days/weeks/months/years later)<br>2. Uruguay doesn't have fighter jets like that.<br>3. Even if they did, the pilots wouldn't fly like that.<br>4. Robot attack formation is VERY poor<br>5. Structure of those robots isn't physically possible. (and AGAIN they look WAY TOO human-like)<br>6. Shaky cams suck, PERIOD.<br>7. Explosions are unrealistic</p><p>Why on Earth would you pour money to something like that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sucky list1 .
Music is stolen ( 28 days/weeks/months/years later ) 2 .
Uruguay does n't have fighter jets like that.3 .
Even if they did , the pilots would n't fly like that.4 .
Robot attack formation is VERY poor5 .
Structure of those robots is n't physically possible .
( and AGAIN they look WAY TOO human-like ) 6 .
Shaky cams suck , PERIOD.7 .
Explosions are unrealisticWhy on Earth would you pour money to something like that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sucky list1.
Music is stolen (28 days/weeks/months/years later)2.
Uruguay doesn't have fighter jets like that.3.
Even if they did, the pilots wouldn't fly like that.4.
Robot attack formation is VERY poor5.
Structure of those robots isn't physically possible.
(and AGAIN they look WAY TOO human-like)6.
Shaky cams suck, PERIOD.7.
Explosions are unrealisticWhy on Earth would you pour money to something like that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30479010</id>
	<title>if only it had</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261044180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>some sharks with frickin' laser beams, he would have gotten a 600 mil deal...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>some sharks with frickin ' laser beams , he would have gotten a 600 mil deal.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>some sharks with frickin' laser beams, he would have gotten a 600 mil deal...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30487724</id>
	<title>Terrorism?</title>
	<author>Sir Holo</author>
	<datestamp>1261153980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If he had used a USA locale for his CG creations, he might be in Guantanamo instead of Hollywood by now.<br>
<br>
Or, uh, are we past that now?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If he had used a USA locale for his CG creations , he might be in Guantanamo instead of Hollywood by now .
Or , uh , are we past that now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he had used a USA locale for his CG creations, he might be in Guantanamo instead of Hollywood by now.
Or, uh, are we past that now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478120</id>
	<title>Re:Putting the "Fiction" back in Science Fiction</title>
	<author>Nashville Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1261040760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They wanted to take up canasta to replace their Friday night intergalactic whist league so they went to the source.  It makes perfect sense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They wanted to take up canasta to replace their Friday night intergalactic whist league so they went to the source .
It makes perfect sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They wanted to take up canasta to replace their Friday night intergalactic whist league so they went to the source.
It makes perfect sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476354</id>
	<title>not so impressed, what am I missing here ....</title>
	<author>acidfast7</author>
	<datestamp>1261077840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>basically a bunch of average CGI on top of the tried-and-true cinematography to cause a sense a panic in the viewer.

I didn't see any new ideas nor any new cinematographic techniques.

what am I missing?

it seems like Fede wrote a short storyline, divided it into scenes, shot the scenes with a "few" extras and dropped some CGI on top. how is this different from any Film School project? Ah, it doesn't show any plot, character development, suspense or new techniques/ideas<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(

story must be bogus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>basically a bunch of average CGI on top of the tried-and-true cinematography to cause a sense a panic in the viewer .
I did n't see any new ideas nor any new cinematographic techniques .
what am I missing ?
it seems like Fede wrote a short storyline , divided it into scenes , shot the scenes with a " few " extras and dropped some CGI on top .
how is this different from any Film School project ?
Ah , it does n't show any plot , character development , suspense or new techniques/ideas : ( story must be bogus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>basically a bunch of average CGI on top of the tried-and-true cinematography to cause a sense a panic in the viewer.
I didn't see any new ideas nor any new cinematographic techniques.
what am I missing?
it seems like Fede wrote a short storyline, divided it into scenes, shot the scenes with a "few" extras and dropped some CGI on top.
how is this different from any Film School project?
Ah, it doesn't show any plot, character development, suspense or new techniques/ideas :(

story must be bogus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481032</id>
	<title>Re:Not a new idea</title>
	<author>fabioalcor</author>
	<datestamp>1261052760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the movie have visual and sound effects, climate and music totally perfect for a Half Life movie.<br>Furthermore, for a Half Life movie the story is already done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the movie have visual and sound effects , climate and music totally perfect for a Half Life movie.Furthermore , for a Half Life movie the story is already done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the movie have visual and sound effects, climate and music totally perfect for a Half Life movie.Furthermore, for a Half Life movie the story is already done.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477210</id>
	<title>This deserves more credit than that video.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261080840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This deserves more credit than that video.  I'm posting AC because i don't have a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. account.</p><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHD8Xf5Rnvo</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This deserves more credit than that video .
I 'm posting AC because i do n't have a / .
account.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = qHD8Xf5Rnvo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This deserves more credit than that video.
I'm posting AC because i don't have a /.
account.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHD8Xf5Rnvo</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30514476</id>
	<title>Re:Putting the "Fiction" back in Science Fiction</title>
	<author>orasio</author>
	<datestamp>1261422180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, if they came here looking for latin women, Montevideo is the wrong place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if they came here looking for latin women , Montevideo is the wrong place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if they came here looking for latin women, Montevideo is the wrong place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477192</id>
	<title>Re:What about Shane Carruth?</title>
	<author>fastest fascist</author>
	<datestamp>1261080780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hollywood money means Hollywood rules of filmmaking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hollywood money means Hollywood rules of filmmaking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hollywood money means Hollywood rules of filmmaking.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475744</id>
	<title>Putting the "Fiction" back in Science Fiction</title>
	<author>Raffaello</author>
	<datestamp>1261075320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No offense intended to the great nation of Uruguay, but why would giant robotic aliens give a rat's ass about Montevideo of all places?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No offense intended to the great nation of Uruguay , but why would giant robotic aliens give a rat 's ass about Montevideo of all places ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No offense intended to the great nation of Uruguay, but why would giant robotic aliens give a rat's ass about Montevideo of all places?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477698</id>
	<title>YouTube will be brought to its knees...</title>
	<author>Zarf</author>
	<datestamp>1261082520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... by all the wanna be SciFi film makers uploading their budget clips to YouTube trying to get a movie deal now. Thanks a lot buddy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... by all the wan na be SciFi film makers uploading their budget clips to YouTube trying to get a movie deal now .
Thanks a lot buddy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... by all the wanna be SciFi film makers uploading their budget clips to YouTube trying to get a movie deal now.
Thanks a lot buddy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475822</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>yodleboy</author>
	<datestamp>1261075620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>if means less remakes of second rate movies i'm all for it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>if means less remakes of second rate movies i 'm all for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if means less remakes of second rate movies i'm all for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481994</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>baronvoncarson</author>
	<datestamp>1261058220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think this is a good thing too that they're looking to other sources. To be honest, the movies I enjoy today are ones with the unknown actors, not the big A list celebs you see all the time and generally play the same character every time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this is a good thing too that they 're looking to other sources .
To be honest , the movies I enjoy today are ones with the unknown actors , not the big A list celebs you see all the time and generally play the same character every time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this is a good thing too that they're looking to other sources.
To be honest, the movies I enjoy today are ones with the unknown actors, not the big A list celebs you see all the time and generally play the same character every time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475934</id>
	<title>Actual Video Here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261076100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since there's no link in the summary:  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dadPWhEhVk" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dadPWhEhVk</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>Nice camera work and pretty impressive effects.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since there 's no link in the summary : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = -dadPWhEhVk [ youtube.com ] Nice camera work and pretty impressive effects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since there's no link in the summary:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dadPWhEhVk [youtube.com]Nice camera work and pretty impressive effects.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476132</id>
	<title>and in three years</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1261077060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they remake the movie once more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they remake the movie once more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they remake the movie once more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477252</id>
	<title>Re:The day is coming where we don't need holywood</title>
	<author>nEoN nOoDlE</author>
	<datestamp>1261080960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't need $100 million to make a film anymore, but you do need the millions of dollars Hollywood has in order to get a film seen. They own all the sources of distribution. You want your movie seen in 1000 screens nationwide with a worldwide release? You have to go through them. I know some people will talk about online distribution and YouTube and such, but look at this video. At the moment it has 1,535,618 views, which isn't a lot by Hollywood standards and worldwide standards, and ALL of those views aren't from paying customers. Even at $300 bucks, this guy would not have gotten his money back on the film had Hollywood not offered him a deal. On top of that, the easier it becomes for everybody to make movies, the easier it becomes for everybody to make LOTS of BAD movies. The cream of the crop will be drowned out in a sea of mediocrity - which is exactly what YouTube is now. I'd go so far as to say that YouTube has decreased the quality of independent films. Now, everybody who wants to get their stuff out and be seen by the masses has to pander to an audience that wants funny 10 second clips of pandas sneezing (46,748,716 views) or cats playing on a keyboard (4,497,166 views but MANY rehashes). I have a lot of friends in the effects and indie film industry and all of them have had conversations on how to become the next YouTube sensation, and all of their ideas have suffered in the process. Art dictated by the masses, in my opinion and experience, is a helluva lot worse than art dictated by uncreative studio execs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't need $ 100 million to make a film anymore , but you do need the millions of dollars Hollywood has in order to get a film seen .
They own all the sources of distribution .
You want your movie seen in 1000 screens nationwide with a worldwide release ?
You have to go through them .
I know some people will talk about online distribution and YouTube and such , but look at this video .
At the moment it has 1,535,618 views , which is n't a lot by Hollywood standards and worldwide standards , and ALL of those views are n't from paying customers .
Even at $ 300 bucks , this guy would not have gotten his money back on the film had Hollywood not offered him a deal .
On top of that , the easier it becomes for everybody to make movies , the easier it becomes for everybody to make LOTS of BAD movies .
The cream of the crop will be drowned out in a sea of mediocrity - which is exactly what YouTube is now .
I 'd go so far as to say that YouTube has decreased the quality of independent films .
Now , everybody who wants to get their stuff out and be seen by the masses has to pander to an audience that wants funny 10 second clips of pandas sneezing ( 46,748,716 views ) or cats playing on a keyboard ( 4,497,166 views but MANY rehashes ) .
I have a lot of friends in the effects and indie film industry and all of them have had conversations on how to become the next YouTube sensation , and all of their ideas have suffered in the process .
Art dictated by the masses , in my opinion and experience , is a helluva lot worse than art dictated by uncreative studio execs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't need $100 million to make a film anymore, but you do need the millions of dollars Hollywood has in order to get a film seen.
They own all the sources of distribution.
You want your movie seen in 1000 screens nationwide with a worldwide release?
You have to go through them.
I know some people will talk about online distribution and YouTube and such, but look at this video.
At the moment it has 1,535,618 views, which isn't a lot by Hollywood standards and worldwide standards, and ALL of those views aren't from paying customers.
Even at $300 bucks, this guy would not have gotten his money back on the film had Hollywood not offered him a deal.
On top of that, the easier it becomes for everybody to make movies, the easier it becomes for everybody to make LOTS of BAD movies.
The cream of the crop will be drowned out in a sea of mediocrity - which is exactly what YouTube is now.
I'd go so far as to say that YouTube has decreased the quality of independent films.
Now, everybody who wants to get their stuff out and be seen by the masses has to pander to an audience that wants funny 10 second clips of pandas sneezing (46,748,716 views) or cats playing on a keyboard (4,497,166 views but MANY rehashes).
I have a lot of friends in the effects and indie film industry and all of them have had conversations on how to become the next YouTube sensation, and all of their ideas have suffered in the process.
Art dictated by the masses, in my opinion and experience, is a helluva lot worse than art dictated by uncreative studio execs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478738</id>
	<title>Giving Credit Where Due?</title>
	<author>Auto\_Lykos</author>
	<datestamp>1261043160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was watching this thinking, hey, that music sounds awfully familiar? Dug through my music collection and found the music in the video (Which does add a good deal of the "awesome" factor.) is a splicing of the song "In The House- In A Heartbeat" from the original soundtrack of 28 Days Later by John Murphy.<br><br>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSYYEDXaGo0</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was watching this thinking , hey , that music sounds awfully familiar ?
Dug through my music collection and found the music in the video ( Which does add a good deal of the " awesome " factor .
) is a splicing of the song " In The House- In A Heartbeat " from the original soundtrack of 28 Days Later by John Murphy.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = KSYYEDXaGo0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was watching this thinking, hey, that music sounds awfully familiar?
Dug through my music collection and found the music in the video (Which does add a good deal of the "awesome" factor.
) is a splicing of the song "In The House- In A Heartbeat" from the original soundtrack of 28 Days Later by John Murphy.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSYYEDXaGo0</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30491262</id>
	<title>Good production values sums it up</title>
	<author>ichigo 2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1261166820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good visual effects - check<br>
Epic music - check<br>
Illogical plot (certainly dropping a bomb would be easier than marching through Uruguay) - check<br>
<br>
Yep, he is certainly Hollywood material.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good visual effects - check Epic music - check Illogical plot ( certainly dropping a bomb would be easier than marching through Uruguay ) - check Yep , he is certainly Hollywood material .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good visual effects - check
Epic music - check
Illogical plot (certainly dropping a bomb would be easier than marching through Uruguay) - check

Yep, he is certainly Hollywood material.
:P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477612</id>
	<title>Re:What about Shane Carruth?</title>
	<author>inhuman\_4</author>
	<datestamp>1261082280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed it was a very good movie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed it was a very good movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed it was a very good movie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476372</id>
	<title>Are there any Uraguayans here?</title>
	<author>AmigaHeretic</author>
	<datestamp>1261077900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, of course, their requests for subsidies was not Uraguayan in and of it is as it were the United States government would never have if the president, our president, had not and as far as I know that's the way it will always be. Is that clear?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , of course , their requests for subsidies was not Uraguayan in and of it is as it were the United States government would never have if the president , our president , had not and as far as I know that 's the way it will always be .
Is that clear ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, of course, their requests for subsidies was not Uraguayan in and of it is as it were the United States government would never have if the president, our president, had not and as far as I know that's the way it will always be.
Is that clear?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475618</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>Smegly</author>
	<datestamp>1261074780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas, and must turn to new sources.</p></div><p>Proof that Hollywood has a <i>lot more</i> more to fear from this trend on the internet than than just copyright infringement...  the more amateur file makers gain recognition and rewards - the better quality their films will become. Diluting eyeballs and eroding profit margins for Hollywood. Yay!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas , and must turn to new sources.Proof that Hollywood has a lot more more to fear from this trend on the internet than than just copyright infringement... the more amateur file makers gain recognition and rewards - the better quality their films will become .
Diluting eyeballs and eroding profit margins for Hollywood .
Yay !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas, and must turn to new sources.Proof that Hollywood has a lot more more to fear from this trend on the internet than than just copyright infringement...  the more amateur file makers gain recognition and rewards - the better quality their films will become.
Diluting eyeballs and eroding profit margins for Hollywood.
Yay!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476450</id>
	<title>Headline News Alert!  FLASH!</title>
	<author>bonze</author>
	<datestamp>1261078140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aliens, annoyed by movies portraying them as dumsheets obsessed with Blowing Sheet Up, blanket earth with pathogens.</p><p>More at 11!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aliens , annoyed by movies portraying them as dumsheets obsessed with Blowing Sheet Up , blanket earth with pathogens.More at 11 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aliens, annoyed by movies portraying them as dumsheets obsessed with Blowing Sheet Up, blanket earth with pathogens.More at 11!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476780</id>
	<title>October called...</title>
	<author>Dr. Evil</author>
	<datestamp>1261079220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...they want their meme back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...they want their meme back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...they want their meme back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481222</id>
	<title>Re:That sucks on so many levels</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1261053840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>6. Shaky cams suck, PERIOD.</p></div><p>True.  But it lets producers get away with cheaper CG and less talented actors.  It's the "Jay Leno at 10pm" production model (a.k.a. "Who cares how popular it is, it's cheap as dirt, so our markup percentage is through the roof.")</p><p><div class="quote"><p>4. Robot attack formation is VERY poor</p></div><p>I'm sorry, I didn't realize we had people here who had extensively studied the military doctrine of asymmetrical conflict involving giant humanoid robot combined infantry/artillery.  What academy do you go to for that, anyway?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>6 .
Shaky cams suck , PERIOD.True .
But it lets producers get away with cheaper CG and less talented actors .
It 's the " Jay Leno at 10pm " production model ( a.k.a .
" Who cares how popular it is , it 's cheap as dirt , so our markup percentage is through the roof. " ) 4 .
Robot attack formation is VERY poorI 'm sorry , I did n't realize we had people here who had extensively studied the military doctrine of asymmetrical conflict involving giant humanoid robot combined infantry/artillery .
What academy do you go to for that , anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>6.
Shaky cams suck, PERIOD.True.
But it lets producers get away with cheaper CG and less talented actors.
It's the "Jay Leno at 10pm" production model (a.k.a.
"Who cares how popular it is, it's cheap as dirt, so our markup percentage is through the roof.")4.
Robot attack formation is VERY poorI'm sorry, I didn't realize we had people here who had extensively studied the military doctrine of asymmetrical conflict involving giant humanoid robot combined infantry/artillery.
What academy do you go to for that, anyway?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477506</id>
	<title>disingenous budget</title>
	<author>nEoN nOoDlE</author>
	<datestamp>1261081860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For all the talk about "Hollywood accounting" I find it just as disingenuous when all of these indie shorts come out claiming ridiculously small budgets. Yes, he might have spent $300 out of pocket for some snacks or something for the crew... but the crew worked for free, the cast worked for free, he didn't pay anything for filming on the street (which in most metropolitcan areas in the US he'd have to get a permit and insurance for), the cost of the camera and equipment wasn't included, and most importantly the hundreds of hours he spent creating those visual effects weren't included either. This really gives people a warped sense of scale of how time consuming and work-intensive a production is - especially on here with everyone claiming this is the death of Hollywood. Just like the open source adage - Open Source is free only if your time is worthless... This movie cost $300 bucks only if everyone's time on it was worthless. This is why Sam Raimi didn't say "Oh, you did this for $300 bucks and it's 5 minutes long? That means you could make a 90 minute film for $5400 bucks. Here you go, kid, go nuts."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For all the talk about " Hollywood accounting " I find it just as disingenuous when all of these indie shorts come out claiming ridiculously small budgets .
Yes , he might have spent $ 300 out of pocket for some snacks or something for the crew... but the crew worked for free , the cast worked for free , he did n't pay anything for filming on the street ( which in most metropolitcan areas in the US he 'd have to get a permit and insurance for ) , the cost of the camera and equipment was n't included , and most importantly the hundreds of hours he spent creating those visual effects were n't included either .
This really gives people a warped sense of scale of how time consuming and work-intensive a production is - especially on here with everyone claiming this is the death of Hollywood .
Just like the open source adage - Open Source is free only if your time is worthless... This movie cost $ 300 bucks only if everyone 's time on it was worthless .
This is why Sam Raimi did n't say " Oh , you did this for $ 300 bucks and it 's 5 minutes long ?
That means you could make a 90 minute film for $ 5400 bucks .
Here you go , kid , go nuts .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For all the talk about "Hollywood accounting" I find it just as disingenuous when all of these indie shorts come out claiming ridiculously small budgets.
Yes, he might have spent $300 out of pocket for some snacks or something for the crew... but the crew worked for free, the cast worked for free, he didn't pay anything for filming on the street (which in most metropolitcan areas in the US he'd have to get a permit and insurance for), the cost of the camera and equipment wasn't included, and most importantly the hundreds of hours he spent creating those visual effects weren't included either.
This really gives people a warped sense of scale of how time consuming and work-intensive a production is - especially on here with everyone claiming this is the death of Hollywood.
Just like the open source adage - Open Source is free only if your time is worthless... This movie cost $300 bucks only if everyone's time on it was worthless.
This is why Sam Raimi didn't say "Oh, you did this for $300 bucks and it's 5 minutes long?
That means you could make a 90 minute film for $5400 bucks.
Here you go, kid, go nuts.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30496866</id>
	<title>it's a copy of another short</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it is a copy of another short film... 2004</p><p>http://www.vimeo.com/6966258</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it is a copy of another short film... 2004http : //www.vimeo.com/6966258</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it is a copy of another short film... 2004http://www.vimeo.com/6966258</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475608</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>Necroloth</author>
	<datestamp>1261074720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>turning to other sources weren't things Hollywood did before?
<p>and why complain where they get their ideas if it is a good film?</p><p>For me, this is just an example of it becoming easier for smaller artists/designers/producers etc to be able to show themselves on the world stage, nothing more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>turning to other sources were n't things Hollywood did before ?
and why complain where they get their ideas if it is a good film ? For me , this is just an example of it becoming easier for smaller artists/designers/producers etc to be able to show themselves on the world stage , nothing more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>turning to other sources weren't things Hollywood did before?
and why complain where they get their ideas if it is a good film?For me, this is just an example of it becoming easier for smaller artists/designers/producers etc to be able to show themselves on the world stage, nothing more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30482812</id>
	<title>Ideas?</title>
	<author>Al Al Cool J</author>
	<datestamp>1261063800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't get me wrong, it was a well made short film, and the special effect were impressive, but as far as I recall the extent of the idea was aliens blowing the crap out of Montevideo, with the explosions getting bigger and bigger.  Granted that's probably as good a plotline as Transformers 2, but all in all, I would rather see money go to somebody that has shown they can write a good story, and not just map out action scenes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't get me wrong , it was a well made short film , and the special effect were impressive , but as far as I recall the extent of the idea was aliens blowing the crap out of Montevideo , with the explosions getting bigger and bigger .
Granted that 's probably as good a plotline as Transformers 2 , but all in all , I would rather see money go to somebody that has shown they can write a good story , and not just map out action scenes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't get me wrong, it was a well made short film, and the special effect were impressive, but as far as I recall the extent of the idea was aliens blowing the crap out of Montevideo, with the explosions getting bigger and bigger.
Granted that's probably as good a plotline as Transformers 2, but all in all, I would rather see money go to somebody that has shown they can write a good story, and not just map out action scenes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476342</id>
	<title>Better: "What's in the Box?"</title>
	<author>Shane112358</author>
	<datestamp>1261077720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kudos to this guy for putting together what looks like a big budget trailer for $300.  However, I don't see any original filmmaking ideas - only technical content.

I saw this short film months ago and think it has a lot more originality and an awesome sci-fi slant.  Plus, augmented reality is sweet.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IU\_reTt7Hj4" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IU\_reTt7Hj4</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kudos to this guy for putting together what looks like a big budget trailer for $ 300 .
However , I do n't see any original filmmaking ideas - only technical content .
I saw this short film months ago and think it has a lot more originality and an awesome sci-fi slant .
Plus , augmented reality is sweet .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = IU \ _reTt7Hj4 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kudos to this guy for putting together what looks like a big budget trailer for $300.
However, I don't see any original filmmaking ideas - only technical content.
I saw this short film months ago and think it has a lot more originality and an awesome sci-fi slant.
Plus, augmented reality is sweet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IU\_reTt7Hj4 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475986</id>
	<title>What did Raimi see in this guy?</title>
	<author>prakslash</author>
	<datestamp>1261076400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am sorry but I would take this story with pinch of salt.<br>
Could be someone is pulling a fast one on this guy?<br> <br>

There is nothing in the film that shows any originality or creativity in ideas. It seems like a amateur copy of scenes from "War of the Worlds" and "Independence Day". <br> <br>So, what did Hollywood Studios see in this guy?<br> <br>
That he can make a hacky special effects film for $300? Even there, anyone can see that if you used the proper accounting methods, the budget was probaly way more than $300. All those crowds running was previously shot and reused dfootage. If he had to perform original shooting of those scenes, the budget would go way over $300. Same goes for the explosions and other special effects. He probably spent a long time on creating those but did not include the dollar value of that time which typically would add thousands of dollars to the film's budget.

So, I am not seeing what he brought to the table.<br> Those fan-created Star Trek episodes have more going for them than this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am sorry but I would take this story with pinch of salt .
Could be someone is pulling a fast one on this guy ?
There is nothing in the film that shows any originality or creativity in ideas .
It seems like a amateur copy of scenes from " War of the Worlds " and " Independence Day " .
So , what did Hollywood Studios see in this guy ?
That he can make a hacky special effects film for $ 300 ?
Even there , anyone can see that if you used the proper accounting methods , the budget was probaly way more than $ 300 .
All those crowds running was previously shot and reused dfootage .
If he had to perform original shooting of those scenes , the budget would go way over $ 300 .
Same goes for the explosions and other special effects .
He probably spent a long time on creating those but did not include the dollar value of that time which typically would add thousands of dollars to the film 's budget .
So , I am not seeing what he brought to the table .
Those fan-created Star Trek episodes have more going for them than this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am sorry but I would take this story with pinch of salt.
Could be someone is pulling a fast one on this guy?
There is nothing in the film that shows any originality or creativity in ideas.
It seems like a amateur copy of scenes from "War of the Worlds" and "Independence Day".
So, what did Hollywood Studios see in this guy?
That he can make a hacky special effects film for $300?
Even there, anyone can see that if you used the proper accounting methods, the budget was probaly way more than $300.
All those crowds running was previously shot and reused dfootage.
If he had to perform original shooting of those scenes, the budget would go way over $300.
Same goes for the explosions and other special effects.
He probably spent a long time on creating those but did not include the dollar value of that time which typically would add thousands of dollars to the film's budget.
So, I am not seeing what he brought to the table.
Those fan-created Star Trek episodes have more going for them than this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30514412</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>orasio</author>
	<datestamp>1261421880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you for the "metropolis" status. Montevideo is a 1.5 million people city. It's real nice, but  not a metropolis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you for the " metropolis " status .
Montevideo is a 1.5 million people city .
It 's real nice , but not a metropolis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you for the "metropolis" status.
Montevideo is a 1.5 million people city.
It's real nice, but  not a metropolis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481296</id>
	<title>Re:What did Raimi see in this guy?</title>
	<author>eulernet</author>
	<datestamp>1261054380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you read the original post: <a href="http://www.taringa.net/posts/videos/3854519/Ataque-de-Panico!-Robots-Gigantes-en-Montevideo.html" title="taringa.net">http://www.taringa.net/posts/videos/3854519/Ataque-de-Panico!-Robots-Gigantes-en-Montevideo.html</a> [taringa.net]<br>you'll see that they worked for 6 months on it, with a ton of tools, that are a lot more expensive than $300 (they cite 3dMax, FumeFx, Glu3d, AfterEffects, Photoshop y Premiere), unless these softwares were pirated.</p><p>This is definitely NOT the work of an amateur !<br>The director has probably access to an expensive camera.<br>Why ?<br>I worked previously in a game company where the graphists had to integrate effects into real pictures.<br>There was a problem because some parts of the movie were shot without steadycam (meaning that when the cameraman filmed, the camera was moving just a little bit, because of his breathing).<br>To adjust the effects on the pictures, the graphists had to correct the scenes frame by frame, by slightly rotating the effect.</p><p>In the video, you can see that the camera is always moving, so this means that the director kept track of the position of the camera at every frame. It's of course possible to do this manually, but requires a lot of (useless) manual work.</p><p>Anyway, the effects are very well embedded into the real pictures.</p><p>So the $300 have probably been spent on paying the extras on the screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you read the original post : http : //www.taringa.net/posts/videos/3854519/Ataque-de-Panico ! -Robots-Gigantes-en-Montevideo.html [ taringa.net ] you 'll see that they worked for 6 months on it , with a ton of tools , that are a lot more expensive than $ 300 ( they cite 3dMax , FumeFx , Glu3d , AfterEffects , Photoshop y Premiere ) , unless these softwares were pirated.This is definitely NOT the work of an amateur ! The director has probably access to an expensive camera.Why ? I worked previously in a game company where the graphists had to integrate effects into real pictures.There was a problem because some parts of the movie were shot without steadycam ( meaning that when the cameraman filmed , the camera was moving just a little bit , because of his breathing ) .To adjust the effects on the pictures , the graphists had to correct the scenes frame by frame , by slightly rotating the effect.In the video , you can see that the camera is always moving , so this means that the director kept track of the position of the camera at every frame .
It 's of course possible to do this manually , but requires a lot of ( useless ) manual work.Anyway , the effects are very well embedded into the real pictures.So the $ 300 have probably been spent on paying the extras on the screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you read the original post: http://www.taringa.net/posts/videos/3854519/Ataque-de-Panico!-Robots-Gigantes-en-Montevideo.html [taringa.net]you'll see that they worked for 6 months on it, with a ton of tools, that are a lot more expensive than $300 (they cite 3dMax, FumeFx, Glu3d, AfterEffects, Photoshop y Premiere), unless these softwares were pirated.This is definitely NOT the work of an amateur !The director has probably access to an expensive camera.Why ?I worked previously in a game company where the graphists had to integrate effects into real pictures.There was a problem because some parts of the movie were shot without steadycam (meaning that when the cameraman filmed, the camera was moving just a little bit, because of his breathing).To adjust the effects on the pictures, the graphists had to correct the scenes frame by frame, by slightly rotating the effect.In the video, you can see that the camera is always moving, so this means that the director kept track of the position of the camera at every frame.
It's of course possible to do this manually, but requires a lot of (useless) manual work.Anyway, the effects are very well embedded into the real pictures.So the $300 have probably been spent on paying the extras on the screen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476584</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1261078620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh yeah... enemies from space destroying earth. That's new.</p><p>Different people, same old ideas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yeah... enemies from space destroying earth .
That 's new.Different people , same old ideas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yeah... enemies from space destroying earth.
That's new.Different people, same old ideas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477746</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>znerk</author>
	<datestamp>1261082700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For me, this is just an example of it becoming easier for smaller artists/designers/producers etc to be able to show themselves on the world stage, nothing more.</p></div><p>I've got something more...<br>This dude makes a video of killer robots attacking and destroying a major metropolis... for $300. Why are all these other movies with spectacular special effects costing hundreds of millions of dollars to make?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For me , this is just an example of it becoming easier for smaller artists/designers/producers etc to be able to show themselves on the world stage , nothing more.I 've got something more...This dude makes a video of killer robots attacking and destroying a major metropolis... for $ 300 .
Why are all these other movies with spectacular special effects costing hundreds of millions of dollars to make ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For me, this is just an example of it becoming easier for smaller artists/designers/producers etc to be able to show themselves on the world stage, nothing more.I've got something more...This dude makes a video of killer robots attacking and destroying a major metropolis... for $300.
Why are all these other movies with spectacular special effects costing hundreds of millions of dollars to make?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475558</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>WormholeFiend</author>
	<datestamp>1261074540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I call shenanigans</p><p>I uploaded several adult vids and I have yet to hear from the pr0n industry</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I call shenanigansI uploaded several adult vids and I have yet to hear from the pr0n industry</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call shenanigansI uploaded several adult vids and I have yet to hear from the pr0n industry</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481632</id>
	<title>This is a new idea...</title>
	<author>seandiggity</author>
	<datestamp>1261056300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...because giant alien robots and spacecraft are trashing a city?  Oh, right.  It's doesn't take place in the U.S.
<br> <br>
Scratch that, it probably will.  Aliens don't usually plan one-country invasions.  Anyone wanna take bets on whether this will be better or worse than Transformers 3?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...because giant alien robots and spacecraft are trashing a city ?
Oh , right .
It 's does n't take place in the U.S . Scratch that , it probably will .
Aliens do n't usually plan one-country invasions .
Anyone wan na take bets on whether this will be better or worse than Transformers 3 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...because giant alien robots and spacecraft are trashing a city?
Oh, right.
It's doesn't take place in the U.S.
 
Scratch that, it probably will.
Aliens don't usually plan one-country invasions.
Anyone wanna take bets on whether this will be better or worse than Transformers 3?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478570</id>
	<title>I wish I could do this</title>
	<author>i\_ate\_god</author>
	<datestamp>1261042560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>$300? How?</p><p>Camera<br>Rendering<br>Software</p><p>alone that's more than $300, even if you consider that he used Blender to do the robots and ships.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 300 ?
How ? CameraRenderingSoftwarealone that 's more than $ 300 , even if you consider that he used Blender to do the robots and ships .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$300?
How?CameraRenderingSoftwarealone that's more than $300, even if you consider that he used Blender to do the robots and ships.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476410</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1261078020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas, and must turn to new sources.</i> </p><p>Giant alien machines destroy a great city:</p><p> H.G. Wells <i>The War of the Worlds,</i>1898.<br>Radio adaption for Orson Welle's <i>Mercury Theater of the Air</i>, 1938.<br>Film adaption by George Pal, 1953.<br>Radio adaptation by WKBW, Buffalo, New York., 1968.<br>Staged live using live remotes. State-of-the-art tech for an independent AM radio station in the sixties.<br>Musical adaptation by Jeff Wayne in 1978.</p><p>Referenced countless times in every media from the bubble gum trading card to the CGI animated feature. [<i>Monsters vs. Aliens</i>, 2008]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas , and must turn to new sources .
Giant alien machines destroy a great city : H.G .
Wells The War of the Worlds,1898.Radio adaption for Orson Welle 's Mercury Theater of the Air , 1938.Film adaption by George Pal , 1953.Radio adaptation by WKBW , Buffalo , New York. , 1968.Staged live using live remotes .
State-of-the-art tech for an independent AM radio station in the sixties.Musical adaptation by Jeff Wayne in 1978.Referenced countless times in every media from the bubble gum trading card to the CGI animated feature .
[ Monsters vs. Aliens , 2008 ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas, and must turn to new sources.
Giant alien machines destroy a great city: H.G.
Wells The War of the Worlds,1898.Radio adaption for Orson Welle's Mercury Theater of the Air, 1938.Film adaption by George Pal, 1953.Radio adaptation by WKBW, Buffalo, New York., 1968.Staged live using live remotes.
State-of-the-art tech for an independent AM radio station in the sixties.Musical adaptation by Jeff Wayne in 1978.Referenced countless times in every media from the bubble gum trading card to the CGI animated feature.
[Monsters vs. Aliens, 2008]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476004</id>
	<title>Re:Not a new idea</title>
	<author>Colonel Korn</author>
	<datestamp>1261076520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas, and must turn to new sources.</p></div><p>It's not even new - it's "War of the Worlds" and "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow" mixed together.</p><p>The guy did a great job with the special effects, but story wise - meh.</p><p>Golloywierd will throw in some hot chick in short shorts and lots of cleavage and it'll make a few hundred million.</p></div><p>Mod parent up and GP down.  It's very nicely done, but the only "good idea" here is having the robots attack South America instead of North America this time.  Clearly he was doing a tech demo tribute to several large (and mediocre) recent Hollywood movies.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas , and must turn to new sources.It 's not even new - it 's " War of the Worlds " and " Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow " mixed together.The guy did a great job with the special effects , but story wise - meh.Golloywierd will throw in some hot chick in short shorts and lots of cleavage and it 'll make a few hundred million.Mod parent up and GP down .
It 's very nicely done , but the only " good idea " here is having the robots attack South America instead of North America this time .
Clearly he was doing a tech demo tribute to several large ( and mediocre ) recent Hollywood movies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Further proof that Hollywood is running out of good ideas, and must turn to new sources.It's not even new - it's "War of the Worlds" and "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow" mixed together.The guy did a great job with the special effects, but story wise - meh.Golloywierd will throw in some hot chick in short shorts and lots of cleavage and it'll make a few hundred million.Mod parent up and GP down.
It's very nicely done, but the only "good idea" here is having the robots attack South America instead of North America this time.
Clearly he was doing a tech demo tribute to several large (and mediocre) recent Hollywood movies.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30479142</id>
	<title>The day is coming where we don't need talent.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261044600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Consumer grade equipment is getting better all the time, perhaps holywood won't be needed."</p><p>Equipment does not an artists make. Any more than does a kitchen make a chef. If Hollywood wasn't needed then Mr Fede Alvarez could have made his own $30 Million without Ghost House's help.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Consumer grade equipment is getting better all the time , perhaps holywood wo n't be needed .
" Equipment does not an artists make .
Any more than does a kitchen make a chef .
If Hollywood was n't needed then Mr Fede Alvarez could have made his own $ 30 Million without Ghost House 's help .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Consumer grade equipment is getting better all the time, perhaps holywood won't be needed.
"Equipment does not an artists make.
Any more than does a kitchen make a chef.
If Hollywood wasn't needed then Mr Fede Alvarez could have made his own $30 Million without Ghost House's help.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481516</id>
	<title>Re:What did Raimi see in this guy?</title>
	<author>pandrijeczko</author>
	<datestamp>1261055700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know something?</p><p>I really liked the clip &amp; I really quite like the idea of seeing a full length movie based on it - personally, I don't care whether the clip is genuine or viral, it's piqued my interest so it's done what it's supposed to.</p><p>So it's derivative of "War Of The Worlds" or "Independence Day". So what? I don't need to have my intellect stretched every time I go and see a movie, sometimes I just want to sit there like the fat consumer I am, pay some money and just be *ENTERTAINED*.</p><p>If anything the movie industry is so scared of itself that most of it tries too damned hard to churn out blockbuster after blockbuster, sequel after sequel, when sometimes an enjoyable "B" movie is all that's needed - exactly why a director like John Carpenter can stay relatively independent &amp; just put out movies based on stories he wants to tell and will be a bit of good fun to watch.</p><p>So please don't spend too much time analysing it because you're wasting your time - all that matters is whether or not you enjoyed it and if it becomes a full length movie then either go see it or don't go and see it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know something ? I really liked the clip &amp; I really quite like the idea of seeing a full length movie based on it - personally , I do n't care whether the clip is genuine or viral , it 's piqued my interest so it 's done what it 's supposed to.So it 's derivative of " War Of The Worlds " or " Independence Day " .
So what ?
I do n't need to have my intellect stretched every time I go and see a movie , sometimes I just want to sit there like the fat consumer I am , pay some money and just be * ENTERTAINED * .If anything the movie industry is so scared of itself that most of it tries too damned hard to churn out blockbuster after blockbuster , sequel after sequel , when sometimes an enjoyable " B " movie is all that 's needed - exactly why a director like John Carpenter can stay relatively independent &amp; just put out movies based on stories he wants to tell and will be a bit of good fun to watch.So please do n't spend too much time analysing it because you 're wasting your time - all that matters is whether or not you enjoyed it and if it becomes a full length movie then either go see it or do n't go and see it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know something?I really liked the clip &amp; I really quite like the idea of seeing a full length movie based on it - personally, I don't care whether the clip is genuine or viral, it's piqued my interest so it's done what it's supposed to.So it's derivative of "War Of The Worlds" or "Independence Day".
So what?
I don't need to have my intellect stretched every time I go and see a movie, sometimes I just want to sit there like the fat consumer I am, pay some money and just be *ENTERTAINED*.If anything the movie industry is so scared of itself that most of it tries too damned hard to churn out blockbuster after blockbuster, sequel after sequel, when sometimes an enjoyable "B" movie is all that's needed - exactly why a director like John Carpenter can stay relatively independent &amp; just put out movies based on stories he wants to tell and will be a bit of good fun to watch.So please don't spend too much time analysing it because you're wasting your time - all that matters is whether or not you enjoyed it and if it becomes a full length movie then either go see it or don't go and see it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30482746</id>
	<title>Re:Better: "What's in the Box?"</title>
	<author>qzulla</author>
	<datestamp>1261063380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, that kinda... sucked.</p><p>qz</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , that kinda... sucked.qz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, that kinda... sucked.qz</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475940</id>
	<title>Space Invaders</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1261076100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Movie</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Movie</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Movie</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476912</id>
	<title>Re:What did Raimi see in this guy?</title>
	<author>the\_wesman</author>
	<datestamp>1261079760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>jealous much?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>jealous much ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>jealous much?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476602</id>
	<title>This was so cool</title>
	<author>bensafrickingenius</author>
	<datestamp>1261078680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm going to go watch the longer version of it called "The War of the Worlds" (2005) again tonight.  No, seriously, the Youtube vid was VERY cool.  But I think what I liked most about it was that it reminded me of the Dakota Fanning movie.  Oh, I guess Tom Cruise might have been in it too...  Anyway, it was a very cool, very scary movie.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to go watch the longer version of it called " The War of the Worlds " ( 2005 ) again tonight .
No , seriously , the Youtube vid was VERY cool .
But I think what I liked most about it was that it reminded me of the Dakota Fanning movie .
Oh , I guess Tom Cruise might have been in it too... Anyway , it was a very cool , very scary movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to go watch the longer version of it called "The War of the Worlds" (2005) again tonight.
No, seriously, the Youtube vid was VERY cool.
But I think what I liked most about it was that it reminded me of the Dakota Fanning movie.
Oh, I guess Tom Cruise might have been in it too...  Anyway, it was a very cool, very scary movie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475930</id>
	<title>Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow</title>
	<author>dirkdodgers</author>
	<datestamp>1261076040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone? Same scene done better in a novel story that was a huge risk in Hollywood.</p><p>Yes, it's impressive that the linked video was done on an amateur budget, and congratulations to this guy; I hope he makes millions, but let's not pretend this is original stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone ?
Same scene done better in a novel story that was a huge risk in Hollywood.Yes , it 's impressive that the linked video was done on an amateur budget , and congratulations to this guy ; I hope he makes millions , but let 's not pretend this is original stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone?
Same scene done better in a novel story that was a huge risk in Hollywood.Yes, it's impressive that the linked video was done on an amateur budget, and congratulations to this guy; I hope he makes millions, but let's not pretend this is original stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475894</id>
	<title>Flaming lips on fire off the shoulder of Orion</title>
	<author>paiute</author>
	<datestamp>1261075920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was going to say that I was waiting for Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots, the movie, but according to Wikipedia, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoshimi\_Battles\_the\_Pink\_Robots) there is a Broadway musical in development. So the movie will not be far behind.</p><p>And the plot outline looks pretty interesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to say that I was waiting for Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots , the movie , but according to Wikipedia , ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoshimi \ _Battles \ _the \ _Pink \ _Robots ) there is a Broadway musical in development .
So the movie will not be far behind.And the plot outline looks pretty interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to say that I was waiting for Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots, the movie, but according to Wikipedia, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoshimi\_Battles\_the\_Pink\_Robots) there is a Broadway musical in development.
So the movie will not be far behind.And the plot outline looks pretty interesting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476706</id>
	<title>$30 million not $300 million</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261078980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The deal was for $30 million, not $300 million.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The deal was for $ 30 million , not $ 300 million .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The deal was for $30 million, not $300 million.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475998</id>
	<title>The day is coming where we don't need holywood</title>
	<author>jabjoe</author>
	<datestamp>1261076520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Being able to make movies much cheaper is a good thing. Means making a movie is much less financially risky, so people are more likely to back something new and unknown. Consumer grade equipment is getting better all the time, perhaps holywood won't be needed. This plus file sharing must have holywood filling their pants, not sure drawing such attention with such large sums of money was wise for them.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Being able to make movies much cheaper is a good thing .
Means making a movie is much less financially risky , so people are more likely to back something new and unknown .
Consumer grade equipment is getting better all the time , perhaps holywood wo n't be needed .
This plus file sharing must have holywood filling their pants , not sure drawing such attention with such large sums of money was wise for them.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being able to make movies much cheaper is a good thing.
Means making a movie is much less financially risky, so people are more likely to back something new and unknown.
Consumer grade equipment is getting better all the time, perhaps holywood won't be needed.
This plus file sharing must have holywood filling their pants, not sure drawing such attention with such large sums of money was wise for them.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30479614</id>
	<title>Sergei Eisenstein</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261046160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did anyone catch that stroller-going-down-the-staircase-thing from "The Battleship Potemkin". If this actually gets made as a film it might be pretty good with that kind of attitude. The wave of big budget apocalypse moves coming out have avoided a lot of the more interesting aspects of the paranoia that Hollywoods been cashing in on. And a wink to the most famous old school Soviet Propaganda movie makes the subtext a hell of a lot more interesting then most of the garbage that gets shoveled out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone catch that stroller-going-down-the-staircase-thing from " The Battleship Potemkin " .
If this actually gets made as a film it might be pretty good with that kind of attitude .
The wave of big budget apocalypse moves coming out have avoided a lot of the more interesting aspects of the paranoia that Hollywoods been cashing in on .
And a wink to the most famous old school Soviet Propaganda movie makes the subtext a hell of a lot more interesting then most of the garbage that gets shoveled out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone catch that stroller-going-down-the-staircase-thing from "The Battleship Potemkin".
If this actually gets made as a film it might be pretty good with that kind of attitude.
The wave of big budget apocalypse moves coming out have avoided a lot of the more interesting aspects of the paranoia that Hollywoods been cashing in on.
And a wink to the most famous old school Soviet Propaganda movie makes the subtext a hell of a lot more interesting then most of the garbage that gets shoveled out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30483260</id>
	<title>Re:I hate the internet ( and you ) and slashot</title>
	<author>cffrost</author>
	<datestamp>1261067700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>[...] not one person has discussed *HOW* he did it?</p></div><p>He used special effects.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ ... ] not one person has discussed * HOW * he did it ? He used special effects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[...] not one person has discussed *HOW* he did it?He used special effects.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476788</id>
	<title>I liked this homegrown movie the first time</title>
	<author>Papatoast</author>
	<datestamp>1261079280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I saw it when it was called "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow"  (I know, the film actually did get picked up and finished by a studio, but it started out as a homegrown short)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw it when it was called " Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow " ( I know , the film actually did get picked up and finished by a studio , but it started out as a homegrown short )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw it when it was called "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow"  (I know, the film actually did get picked up and finished by a studio, but it started out as a homegrown short)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481024</id>
	<title>Re:What about Shane Carruth?</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1261052700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've watched Primer three times. It's great, but I was wondering if you can PM me and tell me what it's about...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've watched Primer three times .
It 's great , but I was wondering if you can PM me and tell me what it 's about.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've watched Primer three times.
It's great, but I was wondering if you can PM me and tell me what it's about...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476246</id>
	<title>Re:What did Raimi see in this guy?</title>
	<author>pavon</author>
	<datestamp>1261077420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There is nothing in the film that shows any originality or creativity in ideas.<br>So, what did Hollywood Studios see in this guy?</p></div><p>I think you just answered that yourself<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is nothing in the film that shows any originality or creativity in ideas.So , what did Hollywood Studios see in this guy ? I think you just answered that yourself : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is nothing in the film that shows any originality or creativity in ideas.So, what did Hollywood Studios see in this guy?I think you just answered that yourself :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30480184</id>
	<title>emails read</title>
	<author>poached</author>
	<datestamp>1261048620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'I uploaded (Panic Attack!) on a Thursday and on Monday my inbox was totally full of e-mails from Hollywood studios,'</p><p>From: 20th Century Fox<br>To: Youtube video winer<br>Subject: you won 300 million US</p><p>Congratulations Mr. Alvarez!  Your youtube entry was the lucky winner of our video sweepstakes.  To collect your lumpsum of 300 million US dollars please send a small processing fee of 2000 US dollars so we can begin releasing the funds to you.  Once your payment has been processed you will be contacted for an account to deposit the funds to.  Please do not delay!</p><p>Regards,<br>Mr. Jones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'I uploaded ( Panic Attack !
) on a Thursday and on Monday my inbox was totally full of e-mails from Hollywood studios,'From : 20th Century FoxTo : Youtube video winerSubject : you won 300 million USCongratulations Mr. Alvarez ! Your youtube entry was the lucky winner of our video sweepstakes .
To collect your lumpsum of 300 million US dollars please send a small processing fee of 2000 US dollars so we can begin releasing the funds to you .
Once your payment has been processed you will be contacted for an account to deposit the funds to .
Please do not delay ! Regards,Mr .
Jones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'I uploaded (Panic Attack!
) on a Thursday and on Monday my inbox was totally full of e-mails from Hollywood studios,'From: 20th Century FoxTo: Youtube video winerSubject: you won 300 million USCongratulations Mr. Alvarez!  Your youtube entry was the lucky winner of our video sweepstakes.
To collect your lumpsum of 300 million US dollars please send a small processing fee of 2000 US dollars so we can begin releasing the funds to you.
Once your payment has been processed you will be contacted for an account to deposit the funds to.
Please do not delay!Regards,Mr.
Jones.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475628</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261074840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think it's fair to say that Sam Raimi was ever part of the "Hollywood problem".  He will do just about anything, as long as he thinks it will be entertaining.  He has done:</p><p>The Evil Dead and its sequels<br>Dark Man<br>Timecop<br>Hercules, the Legendary Journeys<br>Xena<br>MANTIS<br>The Hudsucker Proxy<br>Legend of the Seeker<br>American Gothic</p><p>Sam Raimi's work might not be on Bergman's level, but he has definitely introduced a style of his own into film and television.  He has been asked to work for the modern comic book movies, because he basically invented the format of a modern comic book movie with the Evil Dead and Dark Man.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think it 's fair to say that Sam Raimi was ever part of the " Hollywood problem " .
He will do just about anything , as long as he thinks it will be entertaining .
He has done : The Evil Dead and its sequelsDark ManTimecopHercules , the Legendary JourneysXenaMANTISThe Hudsucker ProxyLegend of the SeekerAmerican GothicSam Raimi 's work might not be on Bergman 's level , but he has definitely introduced a style of his own into film and television .
He has been asked to work for the modern comic book movies , because he basically invented the format of a modern comic book movie with the Evil Dead and Dark Man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think it's fair to say that Sam Raimi was ever part of the "Hollywood problem".
He will do just about anything, as long as he thinks it will be entertaining.
He has done:The Evil Dead and its sequelsDark ManTimecopHercules, the Legendary JourneysXenaMANTISThe Hudsucker ProxyLegend of the SeekerAmerican GothicSam Raimi's work might not be on Bergman's level, but he has definitely introduced a style of his own into film and television.
He has been asked to work for the modern comic book movies, because he basically invented the format of a modern comic book movie with the Evil Dead and Dark Man.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30480174</id>
	<title>Technical Details Please</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261048620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, how, exactly, did he do this for $300?   Did he do all the models and rendering in Blender, or what?  How did he shoot it, and how did he then combine the rendering with the live action?
<br> <br>
I've played with various modeling, animation, and rendering tools.  It's really, really painstaking work.  And nice renderings take a ridiculous amount of time on computers.  I know that they are fast nowadays, but, still, you need either a bunch of computers or CUDA working for you.  Did he fail to mention that maybe he used his Univ. cluster to do rendering, or something like that?
<br> <br>
Take a look at the videos by people at Blender:  <a href="http://www.blender.org/features-gallery/movies/" title="blender.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.blender.org/features-gallery/movies/</a> [blender.org]   Some of them are well done, but they don't have this nice combination of live action with the rendered.  I'm calling BS on this until I know a little more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , how , exactly , did he do this for $ 300 ?
Did he do all the models and rendering in Blender , or what ?
How did he shoot it , and how did he then combine the rendering with the live action ?
I 've played with various modeling , animation , and rendering tools .
It 's really , really painstaking work .
And nice renderings take a ridiculous amount of time on computers .
I know that they are fast nowadays , but , still , you need either a bunch of computers or CUDA working for you .
Did he fail to mention that maybe he used his Univ .
cluster to do rendering , or something like that ?
Take a look at the videos by people at Blender : http : //www.blender.org/features-gallery/movies/ [ blender.org ] Some of them are well done , but they do n't have this nice combination of live action with the rendered .
I 'm calling BS on this until I know a little more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, how, exactly, did he do this for $300?
Did he do all the models and rendering in Blender, or what?
How did he shoot it, and how did he then combine the rendering with the live action?
I've played with various modeling, animation, and rendering tools.
It's really, really painstaking work.
And nice renderings take a ridiculous amount of time on computers.
I know that they are fast nowadays, but, still, you need either a bunch of computers or CUDA working for you.
Did he fail to mention that maybe he used his Univ.
cluster to do rendering, or something like that?
Take a look at the videos by people at Blender:  http://www.blender.org/features-gallery/movies/ [blender.org]   Some of them are well done, but they don't have this nice combination of live action with the rendered.
I'm calling BS on this until I know a little more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476970</id>
	<title>Micheal? Micheal Bay?</title>
	<author>Jinjuku</author>
	<datestamp>1261080000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since when did Micheal Bay move and change his name?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when did Micheal Bay move and change his name ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when did Micheal Bay move and change his name?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30479958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30479478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30480388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30483260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30514412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30479142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30482746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30486916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30483780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30514476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1711256_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476246
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476760
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30491262
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30483780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30480388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30486916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476842
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30479478
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476710
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477192
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30479142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30482746
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477506
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475934
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475946
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475608
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477746
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30514412
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478640
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477718
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476136
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475612
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476004
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30481032
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475744
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476012
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476840
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30514476
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476990
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475836
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478120
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475558
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30475618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476110
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30479958
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30476104
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478570
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478738
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30478434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30483260
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1711256.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1711256.30477210
</commentlist>
</conversation>
