<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_16_193208</id>
	<title>Student Banned From Minnesota Campus Over Facebook Comments</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1260990840000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Be careful just how you vent online is the lesson from this story pointed out by reader kungfugleek, from which he excerpts: <i>"A University of Minnesota student has been banned from the Twin Cities campus after three of her instructors <a href="http://www.postbulletin.com/newsmanager/templates/localnews\_story.asp?z=2&amp;a=429611">felt threatened by some of her Facebook postings</a>.  Amanda Tatro was patted down and questioned by campus police when she got to class Monday. The 29-year-old mortuary science student had posted comments on her Facebook page after breaking up with her boyfriend. She told her Facebook friends she wanted to stab a 'certain someone in the throat' with an embalming instrument. Tatro said she was 'looking forward to Monday's embalming therapy.'  When the instructors learned of the postings, they contacted police."</i> The <a href="http://www.startribune.com/local/79361082.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:\_Yyc:aUUr"> <em>Star-Tribune</em>'s account offers more detail</a>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Be careful just how you vent online is the lesson from this story pointed out by reader kungfugleek , from which he excerpts : " A University of Minnesota student has been banned from the Twin Cities campus after three of her instructors felt threatened by some of her Facebook postings .
Amanda Tatro was patted down and questioned by campus police when she got to class Monday .
The 29-year-old mortuary science student had posted comments on her Facebook page after breaking up with her boyfriend .
She told her Facebook friends she wanted to stab a 'certain someone in the throat ' with an embalming instrument .
Tatro said she was 'looking forward to Monday 's embalming therapy .
' When the instructors learned of the postings , they contacted police .
" The Star-Tribune 's account offers more detail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Be careful just how you vent online is the lesson from this story pointed out by reader kungfugleek, from which he excerpts: "A University of Minnesota student has been banned from the Twin Cities campus after three of her instructors felt threatened by some of her Facebook postings.
Amanda Tatro was patted down and questioned by campus police when she got to class Monday.
The 29-year-old mortuary science student had posted comments on her Facebook page after breaking up with her boyfriend.
She told her Facebook friends she wanted to stab a 'certain someone in the throat' with an embalming instrument.
Tatro said she was 'looking forward to Monday's embalming therapy.
'  When the instructors learned of the postings, they contacted police.
" The  Star-Tribune's account offers more detail.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30469476</id>
	<title>U of Minn has 50K students</title>
	<author>dbc</author>
	<datestamp>1259692200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just consider that.  How big is your school?  How big is your town?  How many nutters do you think there are in a student body population of 50,000 students, just based on raw probability?</p><p>I did grad school at the Minneapolis campus.  Let's see... December... daytime highs might be above zero F, certainly not if measured in C.  Less than 8 hours of daylight right now.  That *is* an environmental stress, even if your car *does* start reliably and have a good heater, which would make it an atypical student car.</p><p>Consider the situation: High pressure professional program, a University so large that the people in the administration to whom you are just a student ID number are... just a staff ID number to the management.</p><p>Yes, I'd worry about my students becoming unhinged.  At any point in time, any population that large will have several people who are deeply hurting inside.</p><p>Just so nobody takes my comments to negatively: U of M can be a great place, but you have to make your own way it in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just consider that .
How big is your school ?
How big is your town ?
How many nutters do you think there are in a student body population of 50,000 students , just based on raw probability ? I did grad school at the Minneapolis campus .
Let 's see... December... daytime highs might be above zero F , certainly not if measured in C. Less than 8 hours of daylight right now .
That * is * an environmental stress , even if your car * does * start reliably and have a good heater , which would make it an atypical student car.Consider the situation : High pressure professional program , a University so large that the people in the administration to whom you are just a student ID number are... just a staff ID number to the management.Yes , I 'd worry about my students becoming unhinged .
At any point in time , any population that large will have several people who are deeply hurting inside.Just so nobody takes my comments to negatively : U of M can be a great place , but you have to make your own way it in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just consider that.
How big is your school?
How big is your town?
How many nutters do you think there are in a student body population of 50,000 students, just based on raw probability?I did grad school at the Minneapolis campus.
Let's see... December... daytime highs might be above zero F, certainly not if measured in C.  Less than 8 hours of daylight right now.
That *is* an environmental stress, even if your car *does* start reliably and have a good heater, which would make it an atypical student car.Consider the situation: High pressure professional program, a University so large that the people in the administration to whom you are just a student ID number are... just a staff ID number to the management.Yes, I'd worry about my students becoming unhinged.
At any point in time, any population that large will have several people who are deeply hurting inside.Just so nobody takes my comments to negatively: U of M can be a great place, but you have to make your own way it in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462536</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1259700660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So let me get this straight: it's ok to <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/08/pastor\_of\_gun-toter\_at\_obama\_event\_day\_before\_even.php" title="talkingpointsmemo.com">bring an assault rifle to a political rally</a> [talkingpointsmemo.com], it's ok to say you want the president of the united states dead, but it's NOT ok to say you'd like to stab some asshole who's really asking for it? Somebody is lacking perspective here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So let me get this straight : it 's ok to bring an assault rifle to a political rally [ talkingpointsmemo.com ] , it 's ok to say you want the president of the united states dead , but it 's NOT ok to say you 'd like to stab some asshole who 's really asking for it ?
Somebody is lacking perspective here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So let me get this straight: it's ok to bring an assault rifle to a political rally [talkingpointsmemo.com], it's ok to say you want the president of the united states dead, but it's NOT ok to say you'd like to stab some asshole who's really asking for it?
Somebody is lacking perspective here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462846</id>
	<title>Mortuary student</title>
	<author>Nadaka</author>
	<datestamp>1259658360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The mortuary industry is very, very, very conservative. They take a dim view on anything that could tarnish their reputation. If it was any other industry, I would find this a ridiculous over reaction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The mortuary industry is very , very , very conservative .
They take a dim view on anything that could tarnish their reputation .
If it was any other industry , I would find this a ridiculous over reaction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The mortuary industry is very, very, very conservative.
They take a dim view on anything that could tarnish their reputation.
If it was any other industry, I would find this a ridiculous over reaction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462652</id>
	<title>Re:personal responsibility</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1259700960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whereas this girl never had a chance to take responsibility (whatever the hell that means), she was simply ejected from the community.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whereas this girl never had a chance to take responsibility ( whatever the hell that means ) , she was simply ejected from the community .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whereas this girl never had a chance to take responsibility (whatever the hell that means), she was simply ejected from the community.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461924</id>
	<title>personal responsibility</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Real adults take repsonsibility for their actions and words no matter on or offline.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Real adults take repsonsibility for their actions and words no matter on or offline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Real adults take repsonsibility for their actions and words no matter on or offline.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462318</id>
	<title>Re:For whatever reason?</title>
	<author>PincushionMan</author>
	<datestamp>1259700000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, but wasn't the boyfriend in the class?  Why would she slice-n-dice a random teacher?  Unless she introduced them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but was n't the boyfriend in the class ?
Why would she slice-n-dice a random teacher ?
Unless she introduced them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but wasn't the boyfriend in the class?
Why would she slice-n-dice a random teacher?
Unless she introduced them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463864</id>
	<title>Oh come on</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259662020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>she is studying mortuary science; Of course her posts are dark.</p><p>What next? Man studying at clown school thrown out because his facebook posts were too evil?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>she is studying mortuary science ; Of course her posts are dark.What next ?
Man studying at clown school thrown out because his facebook posts were too evil ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>she is studying mortuary science; Of course her posts are dark.What next?
Man studying at clown school thrown out because his facebook posts were too evil?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462134</id>
	<title>Re:Threats are threats</title>
	<author>MWoody</author>
	<datestamp>1259699520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No no no, let me fix that:</p><p>Threats are threats, even<br>when online.  Sounds about right.<br>Next topic, please sir!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No no no , let me fix that : Threats are threats , evenwhen online .
Sounds about right.Next topic , please sir !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No no no, let me fix that:Threats are threats, evenwhen online.
Sounds about right.Next topic, please sir!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462086</id>
	<title>If I ran a college</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would ban students for merely having a Facebook account (or at least for attempting to access it using college bandwidth). <br> <br>

Anyone who spends any significant amount of time on that utter e-cesspool of amateur gossip queens attention seekers and other undesirable groups of society who for some reason can't or refuse to socialise in real life can't possibly have the bare minimum of intelligence required to be in college. <br> <br>

'Less of course they were building an app in order to make money from the said horde of idiots, then I would encourage them</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would ban students for merely having a Facebook account ( or at least for attempting to access it using college bandwidth ) .
Anyone who spends any significant amount of time on that utter e-cesspool of amateur gossip queens attention seekers and other undesirable groups of society who for some reason ca n't or refuse to socialise in real life ca n't possibly have the bare minimum of intelligence required to be in college .
'Less of course they were building an app in order to make money from the said horde of idiots , then I would encourage them</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would ban students for merely having a Facebook account (or at least for attempting to access it using college bandwidth).
Anyone who spends any significant amount of time on that utter e-cesspool of amateur gossip queens attention seekers and other undesirable groups of society who for some reason can't or refuse to socialise in real life can't possibly have the bare minimum of intelligence required to be in college.
'Less of course they were building an app in order to make money from the said horde of idiots, then I would encourage them</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462460</id>
	<title>Re:personal responsibility</title>
	<author>Dutch Gun</author>
	<datestamp>1259700420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So you feel that the professors are taking responsibility for destroying a person's college career because she was emotional after a breakup?</p></div><p>From the article:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Despite Tatro's concerns that her ban from campus will mean not being able to participate in the process of reviewing her case, Wolter said that "students are entitled to due process and to participate in the process, as well as an appeals process should they disagree with the outcome."</p><p>Tatro hopes that happens quickly: She's already missed an exam and is set to miss several more. She has since set her Facebook profile to private.</p></div><p>I've read a couple of comments about how her college career is "destroyed", etc.  That has yet to be determined.  I support the professor's decision, but I hope the University doesn't permanently ban her.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you feel that the professors are taking responsibility for destroying a person 's college career because she was emotional after a breakup ? From the article : Despite Tatro 's concerns that her ban from campus will mean not being able to participate in the process of reviewing her case , Wolter said that " students are entitled to due process and to participate in the process , as well as an appeals process should they disagree with the outcome .
" Tatro hopes that happens quickly : She 's already missed an exam and is set to miss several more .
She has since set her Facebook profile to private.I 've read a couple of comments about how her college career is " destroyed " , etc .
That has yet to be determined .
I support the professor 's decision , but I hope the University does n't permanently ban her .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you feel that the professors are taking responsibility for destroying a person's college career because she was emotional after a breakup?From the article:Despite Tatro's concerns that her ban from campus will mean not being able to participate in the process of reviewing her case, Wolter said that "students are entitled to due process and to participate in the process, as well as an appeals process should they disagree with the outcome.
"Tatro hopes that happens quickly: She's already missed an exam and is set to miss several more.
She has since set her Facebook profile to private.I've read a couple of comments about how her college career is "destroyed", etc.
That has yet to be determined.
I support the professor's decision, but I hope the University doesn't permanently ban her.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462540</id>
	<title>LOLCats and Social Networks.</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1259700660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is why I only post pictures of LOLCats on any social network I am part of.</p><p>She just needed to post a pic of a kitten in the morgue with the caption "I am in yur Morgue, stabbing yur throt!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why I only post pictures of LOLCats on any social network I am part of.She just needed to post a pic of a kitten in the morgue with the caption " I am in yur Morgue , stabbing yur throt !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why I only post pictures of LOLCats on any social network I am part of.She just needed to post a pic of a kitten in the morgue with the caption "I am in yur Morgue, stabbing yur throt!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30467448</id>
	<title>John T. K.</title>
	<author>johntkucz</author>
	<datestamp>1259676540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>while yes americans are revoltingly bureaucratic, paranoid and increasingly orwellian, you also have to question the temperment of someone who actually studies mortuary science. xD.</htmltext>
<tokenext>while yes americans are revoltingly bureaucratic , paranoid and increasingly orwellian , you also have to question the temperment of someone who actually studies mortuary science .
xD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>while yes americans are revoltingly bureaucratic, paranoid and increasingly orwellian, you also have to question the temperment of someone who actually studies mortuary science.
xD.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462402</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259700180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except she didn't. She expressed a desire to do so ("wanted to", versus "is going to"), which is something else entirely.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except she did n't .
She expressed a desire to do so ( " wanted to " , versus " is going to " ) , which is something else entirely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except she didn't.
She expressed a desire to do so ("wanted to", versus "is going to"), which is something else entirely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462498</id>
	<title>Re:personal responsibility</title>
	<author>Dog-Cow</author>
	<datestamp>1259700540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are clearly wrong, in general.  Most adults take no responsibility for anything, much less words.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are clearly wrong , in general .
Most adults take no responsibility for anything , much less words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are clearly wrong, in general.
Most adults take no responsibility for anything, much less words.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464036</id>
	<title>Kung Fu 'Gleek'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259662620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wowe.</p><p>"In general, gleeking occurs when an accumulation of saliva in the submandibular gland is propelled out in a stream when the gland is compressed by the tongue. The stream of saliva is released in the general direction of the front of the mouth. If the mouth is open the jet may project several feet. Gleeking is more likely when the salivary gland has been recently stimulated, but even a residual amount of saliva in the gland may be released by gleeking."</p><p>See also, 'skeeter'<br>----</p><p>Way to disrupt your opponents' xi!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wowe .
" In general , gleeking occurs when an accumulation of saliva in the submandibular gland is propelled out in a stream when the gland is compressed by the tongue .
The stream of saliva is released in the general direction of the front of the mouth .
If the mouth is open the jet may project several feet .
Gleeking is more likely when the salivary gland has been recently stimulated , but even a residual amount of saliva in the gland may be released by gleeking .
" See also , 'skeeter'----Way to disrupt your opponents ' xi !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wowe.
"In general, gleeking occurs when an accumulation of saliva in the submandibular gland is propelled out in a stream when the gland is compressed by the tongue.
The stream of saliva is released in the general direction of the front of the mouth.
If the mouth is open the jet may project several feet.
Gleeking is more likely when the salivary gland has been recently stimulated, but even a residual amount of saliva in the gland may be released by gleeking.
"See also, 'skeeter'----Way to disrupt your opponents' xi!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462382</id>
	<title>You'd go out of business</title>
	<author>six11</author>
	<datestamp>1259700180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I would ban students for merely having a Facebook account</p></div> </blockquote><p>You would probably not be able to attract students or faculty in sufficient numbers to stay open. Sure, Facebook wastes a hell of a lot of time. But so does Slashdot. And I could point you to specific instances where I learned something that was of professional, academic relevance to my work on both Facebook and Slashdot.</p><p>We're still trying to figure out how newfangled media works. The first thing anybody does with any new technology is find the most gratuitous possible activities that you couldn't really do before. Social media is in the gratuitous-pointlessness phase right now, but I guarantee you it will mature into something of value.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would ban students for merely having a Facebook account You would probably not be able to attract students or faculty in sufficient numbers to stay open .
Sure , Facebook wastes a hell of a lot of time .
But so does Slashdot .
And I could point you to specific instances where I learned something that was of professional , academic relevance to my work on both Facebook and Slashdot.We 're still trying to figure out how newfangled media works .
The first thing anybody does with any new technology is find the most gratuitous possible activities that you could n't really do before .
Social media is in the gratuitous-pointlessness phase right now , but I guarantee you it will mature into something of value .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would ban students for merely having a Facebook account You would probably not be able to attract students or faculty in sufficient numbers to stay open.
Sure, Facebook wastes a hell of a lot of time.
But so does Slashdot.
And I could point you to specific instances where I learned something that was of professional, academic relevance to my work on both Facebook and Slashdot.We're still trying to figure out how newfangled media works.
The first thing anybody does with any new technology is find the most gratuitous possible activities that you couldn't really do before.
Social media is in the gratuitous-pointlessness phase right now, but I guarantee you it will mature into something of value.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463046</id>
	<title>OK, message received!</title>
	<author>earlymon</author>
	<datestamp>1259659020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As anyone here ever subject to a break-up can attest, the ex will always want to kill you, certainly at least for the first week.</p><p>(Regardless of cause, or who did or said what, or who initiated it - and regardless that this is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. and I must be new here.)</p><p>So, today's lesson is simple - always date girls attending school in Minnesota.</p><p>The negative press she'll receive after her tirade will have you mercy-dating as the good guy in no time!</p><p>As Homer likes to say - SWISH!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As anyone here ever subject to a break-up can attest , the ex will always want to kill you , certainly at least for the first week .
( Regardless of cause , or who did or said what , or who initiated it - and regardless that this is / .
and I must be new here .
) So , today 's lesson is simple - always date girls attending school in Minnesota.The negative press she 'll receive after her tirade will have you mercy-dating as the good guy in no time ! As Homer likes to say - SWISH !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As anyone here ever subject to a break-up can attest, the ex will always want to kill you, certainly at least for the first week.
(Regardless of cause, or who did or said what, or who initiated it - and regardless that this is /.
and I must be new here.
)So, today's lesson is simple - always date girls attending school in Minnesota.The negative press she'll receive after her tirade will have you mercy-dating as the good guy in no time!As Homer likes to say - SWISH!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468360</id>
	<title>Brilliant thinking, on their part.</title>
	<author>Korey Kaczor</author>
	<datestamp>1259682900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This student may be a serial killer, despite overwhelming odds on the contrary, and thus it is important to ensure the safety of all students by having her name, face, and location plastered all over the media where potential employers might find in the future, even if the comments were, in all likelihood, 99.999999\% in frustration and not in seriousness..  That'll make sure she won't become the next Carl Panzram, at any rate</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This student may be a serial killer , despite overwhelming odds on the contrary , and thus it is important to ensure the safety of all students by having her name , face , and location plastered all over the media where potential employers might find in the future , even if the comments were , in all likelihood , 99.999999 \ % in frustration and not in seriousness.. That 'll make sure she wo n't become the next Carl Panzram , at any rate</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This student may be a serial killer, despite overwhelming odds on the contrary, and thus it is important to ensure the safety of all students by having her name, face, and location plastered all over the media where potential employers might find in the future, even if the comments were, in all likelihood, 99.999999\% in frustration and not in seriousness..  That'll make sure she won't become the next Carl Panzram, at any rate</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462484</id>
	<title>Good Decision ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259700480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to say, I'm all for the school making this decision.  The school is quickly blamed for not "seeing the threat coming" when school shooting occur, and being tasked with coming up with ways to keep violence from occurring on campus.</p><p>People need to realize that what you post on the internet is visible by many people, and that it's much different from saying something to your BFF while hanging out on the couch at home.</p><p>It was a threat, plain and simple.  It's not the school's responsibility to figure out if you are joking or not.  They are doing what they can to protect the people at the school.  Do we want to bring an end to bullying?  Do we want to keep our schools safe?  Then idiots who make threats like this, joking or no, will have to be punished for it.</p><p>I mean, come on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... if he'd posted on his facebook, "man, I hope to read in the news that a certain b***h was raped" the guy would have been kicked out school probably, joking or no.  Women's groups would be calling for his ostracism from all that he holds dear.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to say , I 'm all for the school making this decision .
The school is quickly blamed for not " seeing the threat coming " when school shooting occur , and being tasked with coming up with ways to keep violence from occurring on campus.People need to realize that what you post on the internet is visible by many people , and that it 's much different from saying something to your BFF while hanging out on the couch at home.It was a threat , plain and simple .
It 's not the school 's responsibility to figure out if you are joking or not .
They are doing what they can to protect the people at the school .
Do we want to bring an end to bullying ?
Do we want to keep our schools safe ?
Then idiots who make threats like this , joking or no , will have to be punished for it.I mean , come on ... if he 'd posted on his facebook , " man , I hope to read in the news that a certain b * * * h was raped " the guy would have been kicked out school probably , joking or no .
Women 's groups would be calling for his ostracism from all that he holds dear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to say, I'm all for the school making this decision.
The school is quickly blamed for not "seeing the threat coming" when school shooting occur, and being tasked with coming up with ways to keep violence from occurring on campus.People need to realize that what you post on the internet is visible by many people, and that it's much different from saying something to your BFF while hanging out on the couch at home.It was a threat, plain and simple.
It's not the school's responsibility to figure out if you are joking or not.
They are doing what they can to protect the people at the school.
Do we want to bring an end to bullying?
Do we want to keep our schools safe?
Then idiots who make threats like this, joking or no, will have to be punished for it.I mean, come on ... if he'd posted on his facebook, "man, I hope to read in the news that a certain b***h was raped" the guy would have been kicked out school probably, joking or no.
Women's groups would be calling for his ostracism from all that he holds dear.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463042</id>
	<title>why the instructors cared...</title>
	<author>Goldsmith</author>
	<datestamp>1259658960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the actual news piece, I doubt the instructors actually feared for their own safety, at least, I hope not.</p><p>From an instructor's perspective (in physics), it's not cool to joke about using lab equipment in dangerous ways because I am not your friend, I do not know that you are joking, and I am assuming responsibility for you while you're in my class.  I don't want you to hurt yourself (what I really worry about), particularly under my supervision.  I have sent students home who were too immature to handle dangerous lab equipment (high voltage power supplies, radioactive materials... no one has done anything dangerous with the blocks on an inclined plane--no one has tried), I have not had anyone I felt was too depressed or angry (yet).  I hope I would make make such a student take a visit to a school counselor before going to the police!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the actual news piece , I doubt the instructors actually feared for their own safety , at least , I hope not.From an instructor 's perspective ( in physics ) , it 's not cool to joke about using lab equipment in dangerous ways because I am not your friend , I do not know that you are joking , and I am assuming responsibility for you while you 're in my class .
I do n't want you to hurt yourself ( what I really worry about ) , particularly under my supervision .
I have sent students home who were too immature to handle dangerous lab equipment ( high voltage power supplies , radioactive materials... no one has done anything dangerous with the blocks on an inclined plane--no one has tried ) , I have not had anyone I felt was too depressed or angry ( yet ) .
I hope I would make make such a student take a visit to a school counselor before going to the police !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the actual news piece, I doubt the instructors actually feared for their own safety, at least, I hope not.From an instructor's perspective (in physics), it's not cool to joke about using lab equipment in dangerous ways because I am not your friend, I do not know that you are joking, and I am assuming responsibility for you while you're in my class.
I don't want you to hurt yourself (what I really worry about), particularly under my supervision.
I have sent students home who were too immature to handle dangerous lab equipment (high voltage power supplies, radioactive materials... no one has done anything dangerous with the blocks on an inclined plane--no one has tried), I have not had anyone I felt was too depressed or angry (yet).
I hope I would make make such a student take a visit to a school counselor before going to the police!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462592</id>
	<title>Re:Will people learn to watch what's said online?</title>
	<author>Psx29</author>
	<datestamp>1259700780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Indeed, that's why whenever I want to write something I don't want other people to see, I encrypt it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed , that 's why whenever I want to write something I do n't want other people to see , I encrypt it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed, that's why whenever I want to write something I don't want other people to see, I encrypt it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461978</id>
	<title>Pathetic...</title>
	<author>jaymz404</author>
	<datestamp>1259699100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is rediculous. In a land of free speech...

How many times have people said in a state of rage, "I want to kill him"... they don't actually mean it, they just say it.

That is fucking pathetic, and I hope she can find some good legal representation and sue the University because that is an absolute joke, everyone has emotions and sometimes they get the better of you, to deny that is denying your own humanity. Absolute joke.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is rediculous .
In a land of free speech.. . How many times have people said in a state of rage , " I want to kill him " ... they do n't actually mean it , they just say it .
That is fucking pathetic , and I hope she can find some good legal representation and sue the University because that is an absolute joke , everyone has emotions and sometimes they get the better of you , to deny that is denying your own humanity .
Absolute joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is rediculous.
In a land of free speech...

How many times have people said in a state of rage, "I want to kill him"... they don't actually mean it, they just say it.
That is fucking pathetic, and I hope she can find some good legal representation and sue the University because that is an absolute joke, everyone has emotions and sometimes they get the better of you, to deny that is denying your own humanity.
Absolute joke.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463712</id>
	<title>golden rule of cock touching:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259661360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>never let a woman touch your cock who's spent the day touching the cocks of dead people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>never let a woman touch your cock who 's spent the day touching the cocks of dead people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>never let a woman touch your cock who's spent the day touching the cocks of dead people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462028</id>
	<title>Re:Will people learn to watch what's said online?</title>
	<author>Chees0rz</author>
	<datestamp>1259699280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's a shame. What she needed was to be forced to attend counseling, not have her entire college career ruined. But maybe people will learn from her mistake.</p></div><p>Learn what?  Last time I checked, saying "I want to stab someone in the throat" is different from:<br>
a.  Stabbing someone in the throat<br>
b.  Threatening to stab someone in the throat<br>
c.  Planning to stab someone in the throat<br>
d.  Having any intentions of stabbing someone in the throat, at all<br>
e.  Being capable of stabbing someone in the throat<br>
<br> <br>
I really want to take all your mod points.  Quick, ban me for hacking!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a shame .
What she needed was to be forced to attend counseling , not have her entire college career ruined .
But maybe people will learn from her mistake.Learn what ?
Last time I checked , saying " I want to stab someone in the throat " is different from : a. Stabbing someone in the throat b. Threatening to stab someone in the throat c. Planning to stab someone in the throat d. Having any intentions of stabbing someone in the throat , at all e. Being capable of stabbing someone in the throat I really want to take all your mod points .
Quick , ban me for hacking !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a shame.
What she needed was to be forced to attend counseling, not have her entire college career ruined.
But maybe people will learn from her mistake.Learn what?
Last time I checked, saying "I want to stab someone in the throat" is different from:
a.  Stabbing someone in the throat
b.  Threatening to stab someone in the throat
c.  Planning to stab someone in the throat
d.  Having any intentions of stabbing someone in the throat, at all
e.  Being capable of stabbing someone in the throat
 
I really want to take all your mod points.
Quick, ban me for hacking!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462808</id>
	<title>Re:If I ran a college</title>
	<author>spleck</author>
	<datestamp>1259658240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyone who spends any significant amount of time on that utter e-cesspool of amateur gossip queens attention seekers and other undesirable groups of society who for some reason can't or refuse to socialise in real life can't possibly have the bare minimum of intelligence required to be in college.</p></div><p>Facebook IS real life.  It isn't any less real than emailing all the same people that live 300 miles away from me.  And with FB, they can choose when to be assaulted by pictures of my kids rather than receiving them in their email, buried between their Amazon.com order confirmation, and an ad for some really good spyware remover.  I'm certainly not going to go get prints made of the pictures and use the USPS to send a pack of 50 pictures to 300 people.</p><p>Seriously, why can't people realize their friends list is their ACL?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone who spends any significant amount of time on that utter e-cesspool of amateur gossip queens attention seekers and other undesirable groups of society who for some reason ca n't or refuse to socialise in real life ca n't possibly have the bare minimum of intelligence required to be in college.Facebook IS real life .
It is n't any less real than emailing all the same people that live 300 miles away from me .
And with FB , they can choose when to be assaulted by pictures of my kids rather than receiving them in their email , buried between their Amazon.com order confirmation , and an ad for some really good spyware remover .
I 'm certainly not going to go get prints made of the pictures and use the USPS to send a pack of 50 pictures to 300 people.Seriously , why ca n't people realize their friends list is their ACL ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone who spends any significant amount of time on that utter e-cesspool of amateur gossip queens attention seekers and other undesirable groups of society who for some reason can't or refuse to socialise in real life can't possibly have the bare minimum of intelligence required to be in college.Facebook IS real life.
It isn't any less real than emailing all the same people that live 300 miles away from me.
And with FB, they can choose when to be assaulted by pictures of my kids rather than receiving them in their email, buried between their Amazon.com order confirmation, and an ad for some really good spyware remover.
I'm certainly not going to go get prints made of the pictures and use the USPS to send a pack of 50 pictures to 300 people.Seriously, why can't people realize their friends list is their ACL?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30473002</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1261063740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A desire is not an intent, plan nor threat.</p></div><p>The desire wasn&rsquo;t all she expressed.</p><p>There are really a number of implications to consider from this.</p><p>1) Venting angry comments should be done in private or the company of trusted friends<br>2) Your Facebook friends are not trusted friends<br>3) While wanting to kill someone is not the same as planning to do it, death lists are kind of not okay<br>And last and probably least...<br>4) Movie references <em>will</em> be misunderstood; not everyone has seen the movie</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A desire is not an intent , plan nor threat.The desire wasn    t all she expressed.There are really a number of implications to consider from this.1 ) Venting angry comments should be done in private or the company of trusted friends2 ) Your Facebook friends are not trusted friends3 ) While wanting to kill someone is not the same as planning to do it , death lists are kind of not okayAnd last and probably least...4 ) Movie references will be misunderstood ; not everyone has seen the movie</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A desire is not an intent, plan nor threat.The desire wasn’t all she expressed.There are really a number of implications to consider from this.1) Venting angry comments should be done in private or the company of trusted friends2) Your Facebook friends are not trusted friends3) While wanting to kill someone is not the same as planning to do it, death lists are kind of not okayAnd last and probably least...4) Movie references will be misunderstood; not everyone has seen the movie
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462610</id>
	<title>Oh for christ's sake...</title>
	<author>NRP128</author>
	<datestamp>1259700840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How long before we arrive at the Minority Report state where what we THINK is enough to get us incriminated?  Somebody said it above, we're either for freedom of speech, or we're not.  Talking about something isn't the same as doing it.   And all this "for every disaster prevented" stuff is bullshit.</p><p>I work in IT.  If I got nailed to a wall everytime I said I wanted to injure kill somebody, be it outloud, on twitter, facebook, whatever, I'd be serving dozens if not hundreds of consecutive life sentences.  Its part of my vernacular and my charming personality.  I say "Fuck You" a lot too, that doesn't mean I actively want to go have intercourse with that person.</p><p>Fucking people need to lighten up.  We have gotten so scared of our own fucking shadow is despicable.  If the chick has a past history of mental illness or a criminal record, then yeah, they should give things a look.  Apparently the threat wasn't very credible if they waited until she arrived at class to detain her.  Newsflash, the police can find your ass, and its not like she was actively trying to evade them.</p><p>The profs in question overreacted, BADLY.  The University doubly so, handing down a campus ban like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How long before we arrive at the Minority Report state where what we THINK is enough to get us incriminated ?
Somebody said it above , we 're either for freedom of speech , or we 're not .
Talking about something is n't the same as doing it .
And all this " for every disaster prevented " stuff is bullshit.I work in IT .
If I got nailed to a wall everytime I said I wanted to injure kill somebody , be it outloud , on twitter , facebook , whatever , I 'd be serving dozens if not hundreds of consecutive life sentences .
Its part of my vernacular and my charming personality .
I say " Fuck You " a lot too , that does n't mean I actively want to go have intercourse with that person.Fucking people need to lighten up .
We have gotten so scared of our own fucking shadow is despicable .
If the chick has a past history of mental illness or a criminal record , then yeah , they should give things a look .
Apparently the threat was n't very credible if they waited until she arrived at class to detain her .
Newsflash , the police can find your ass , and its not like she was actively trying to evade them.The profs in question overreacted , BADLY .
The University doubly so , handing down a campus ban like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long before we arrive at the Minority Report state where what we THINK is enough to get us incriminated?
Somebody said it above, we're either for freedom of speech, or we're not.
Talking about something isn't the same as doing it.
And all this "for every disaster prevented" stuff is bullshit.I work in IT.
If I got nailed to a wall everytime I said I wanted to injure kill somebody, be it outloud, on twitter, facebook, whatever, I'd be serving dozens if not hundreds of consecutive life sentences.
Its part of my vernacular and my charming personality.
I say "Fuck You" a lot too, that doesn't mean I actively want to go have intercourse with that person.Fucking people need to lighten up.
We have gotten so scared of our own fucking shadow is despicable.
If the chick has a past history of mental illness or a criminal record, then yeah, they should give things a look.
Apparently the threat wasn't very credible if they waited until she arrived at class to detain her.
Newsflash, the police can find your ass, and its not like she was actively trying to evade them.The profs in question overreacted, BADLY.
The University doubly so, handing down a campus ban like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462268</id>
	<title>She should get counseling, fast</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone who has expressed specific thoughts about hurting others is a danger to the public. She should be detained for psychiatric evaluation for 30 days as a precaution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone who has expressed specific thoughts about hurting others is a danger to the public .
She should be detained for psychiatric evaluation for 30 days as a precaution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone who has expressed specific thoughts about hurting others is a danger to the public.
She should be detained for psychiatric evaluation for 30 days as a precaution.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461828</id>
	<title>Threats are threats</title>
	<author>kriston</author>
	<datestamp>1259698680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Threats are threats.</p><p>Yup, sounds about right.</p><p>Next topic, please!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Threats are threats.Yup , sounds about right.Next topic , please !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Threats are threats.Yup, sounds about right.Next topic, please!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462346</id>
	<title>What did you expect?</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1259700060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Facebook.</p><p>Working as intended.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook.Working as intended .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook.Working as intended.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462620</id>
	<title>The usual</title>
	<author>mseeger</author>
	<datestamp>1259700840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The usual thing:</p><p>a) Someone posted something stupid online<br>b) Someone else overreacted</p><p>Sounds like pattern? Read it before? Here on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.? Impossible<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p><p>CU, Martin</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The usual thing : a ) Someone posted something stupid onlineb ) Someone else overreactedSounds like pattern ?
Read it before ?
Here on /. ?
Impossible : - ) CU , Martin</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The usual thing:a) Someone posted something stupid onlineb) Someone else overreactedSounds like pattern?
Read it before?
Here on /.?
Impossible :-)CU, Martin</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463076</id>
	<title>Re:Freedom of Speech Should Prevail</title>
	<author>ISurfTooMuch</author>
	<datestamp>1259659080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am a huge proponent of freedom of speech, but even that has its limits.  By all accounts, this woman made some very threatening comments.  Had she killed anyone?  No, but the statements she made were specific enough and graphic enough that a reasonable person might think she had the intention of carrying them out.  If I walk up to you and tell you that I'm thinking of chopping your head off and making it the centerpiece of my Christmas dinner, you might have a good reason to suspect I might do that, and I would be arrested for threatening to kill you.</p><p>Freedom of speech is not an absolute, and it never has been.  Making threats and inciting violence have always been prosecuted, even in the heyday of the Internet.  I was there then, and you could still get prosecuted if you made such statements, either online or in person.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am a huge proponent of freedom of speech , but even that has its limits .
By all accounts , this woman made some very threatening comments .
Had she killed anyone ?
No , but the statements she made were specific enough and graphic enough that a reasonable person might think she had the intention of carrying them out .
If I walk up to you and tell you that I 'm thinking of chopping your head off and making it the centerpiece of my Christmas dinner , you might have a good reason to suspect I might do that , and I would be arrested for threatening to kill you.Freedom of speech is not an absolute , and it never has been .
Making threats and inciting violence have always been prosecuted , even in the heyday of the Internet .
I was there then , and you could still get prosecuted if you made such statements , either online or in person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am a huge proponent of freedom of speech, but even that has its limits.
By all accounts, this woman made some very threatening comments.
Had she killed anyone?
No, but the statements she made were specific enough and graphic enough that a reasonable person might think she had the intention of carrying them out.
If I walk up to you and tell you that I'm thinking of chopping your head off and making it the centerpiece of my Christmas dinner, you might have a good reason to suspect I might do that, and I would be arrested for threatening to kill you.Freedom of speech is not an absolute, and it never has been.
Making threats and inciting violence have always been prosecuted, even in the heyday of the Internet.
I was there then, and you could still get prosecuted if you made such statements, either online or in person.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465288</id>
	<title>Here's the campus paper story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259666640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If anyone is interested in the story from the campus paper (Minnesota Daily), here it is:</p><p><a href="http://www.mndaily.com/2009/12/16/u-student-suspended-after-threatening-remarks-facebook" title="mndaily.com" rel="nofollow">U student suspended after threatening remarks on Facebook</a> [mndaily.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If anyone is interested in the story from the campus paper ( Minnesota Daily ) , here it is : U student suspended after threatening remarks on Facebook [ mndaily.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If anyone is interested in the story from the campus paper (Minnesota Daily), here it is:U student suspended after threatening remarks on Facebook [mndaily.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468168</id>
	<title>Wait! I've seen that movie!</title>
	<author>gaboalonso</author>
	<datestamp>1259681160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's called Minority Report!

God forbid you of putting your murderous thoughts down in paper, because they will come and get you!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called Minority Report !
God forbid you of putting your murderous thoughts down in paper , because they will come and get you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called Minority Report!
God forbid you of putting your murderous thoughts down in paper, because they will come and get you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464870</id>
	<title>Re:Silly.</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1259665320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This just in:  CmdrTaco has banned user TaggartAleslayer for making death threats; he will be removed from posting privileges until they determine the nature of the threat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This just in : CmdrTaco has banned user TaggartAleslayer for making death threats ; he will be removed from posting privileges until they determine the nature of the threat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This just in:  CmdrTaco has banned user TaggartAleslayer for making death threats; he will be removed from posting privileges until they determine the nature of the threat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464908</id>
	<title>Re:personal responsibility</title>
	<author>Psyborgue</author>
	<datestamp>1259665440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure he's responsible for his words, and that's all he should be judged upon, not hypothetical future crime based on other people's overreaction.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure he 's responsible for his words , and that 's all he should be judged upon , not hypothetical future crime based on other people 's overreaction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure he's responsible for his words, and that's all he should be judged upon, not hypothetical future crime based on other people's overreaction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463266</id>
	<title>Hilarious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259659800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Facebook and Myspace are not a substitute for social interaction. They are not a rich communication media so things like subtlety are nonexistent. Furthermore, when you make a vague general comment, the reader might think you were talking about them.</p><p>Basically, stop being emo, douche-fags and posting every lame sorry and bellyache for the world to read. So your boyfriend broke up with you, waaaaaaahh! Now you're banned from campus, you do want to stab your teachers now because of that? It's the modern-day natural selection, the ban-stick!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook and Myspace are not a substitute for social interaction .
They are not a rich communication media so things like subtlety are nonexistent .
Furthermore , when you make a vague general comment , the reader might think you were talking about them.Basically , stop being emo , douche-fags and posting every lame sorry and bellyache for the world to read .
So your boyfriend broke up with you , waaaaaaahh !
Now you 're banned from campus , you do want to stab your teachers now because of that ?
It 's the modern-day natural selection , the ban-stick !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook and Myspace are not a substitute for social interaction.
They are not a rich communication media so things like subtlety are nonexistent.
Furthermore, when you make a vague general comment, the reader might think you were talking about them.Basically, stop being emo, douche-fags and posting every lame sorry and bellyache for the world to read.
So your boyfriend broke up with you, waaaaaaahh!
Now you're banned from campus, you do want to stab your teachers now because of that?
It's the modern-day natural selection, the ban-stick!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463186</id>
	<title>Re:Now Kids</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259659560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The Internet is full of morons"</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Sterilize this moron so she cannot breed, we need to slow down the Idiocracy here pretty soon...</p></div><p>That wont help. Being really clean might cause her to get pregnant faster.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Internet is full of morons " Sterilize this moron so she can not breed , we need to slow down the Idiocracy here pretty soon...That wont help .
Being really clean might cause her to get pregnant faster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Internet is full of morons"Sterilize this moron so she cannot breed, we need to slow down the Idiocracy here pretty soon...That wont help.
Being really clean might cause her to get pregnant faster.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462166</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463910</id>
	<title>Blame it on the movies.</title>
	<author>Jane Q. Public</author>
	<datestamp>1259662200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>I</b> think she had just watched too many of the <i>Re-Animator</i> movies, and was suffering from a popcorn overdose.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think she had just watched too many of the Re-Animator movies , and was suffering from a popcorn overdose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think she had just watched too many of the Re-Animator movies, and was suffering from a popcorn overdose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461834</id>
	<title>Mortuary Science?</title>
	<author>WiiVault</author>
	<datestamp>1259698680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like that degree is DOA at least for her.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like that degree is DOA at least for her .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like that degree is DOA at least for her.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463528</id>
	<title>Re:Is there ANY venue one can vent?</title>
	<author>gujo-odori</author>
	<datestamp>1259660580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure, there are lots of places.</p><p>-In your residence<br>-In your car<br>-In email to your friends/family<br>-On the phone to your friends/family<br>-In person with your friends/family.</p><p>Venting on Facebook is more like going to Times Square and shouting out loud that you want to kill somebody. Don't be surprised when someone calls the police.</p><p>Lots has been written about people today failing to comprehend the line between public and private and the consequences thereof, so I don't need to add to it. I'll just say that Facebook is public, not private, and that public actions will have public consequences.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , there are lots of places.-In your residence-In your car-In email to your friends/family-On the phone to your friends/family-In person with your friends/family.Venting on Facebook is more like going to Times Square and shouting out loud that you want to kill somebody .
Do n't be surprised when someone calls the police.Lots has been written about people today failing to comprehend the line between public and private and the consequences thereof , so I do n't need to add to it .
I 'll just say that Facebook is public , not private , and that public actions will have public consequences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, there are lots of places.-In your residence-In your car-In email to your friends/family-On the phone to your friends/family-In person with your friends/family.Venting on Facebook is more like going to Times Square and shouting out loud that you want to kill somebody.
Don't be surprised when someone calls the police.Lots has been written about people today failing to comprehend the line between public and private and the consequences thereof, so I don't need to add to it.
I'll just say that Facebook is public, not private, and that public actions will have public consequences.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465014</id>
	<title>Gotta say, this girl sounds hot</title>
	<author>cfalcon</author>
	<datestamp>1259665740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The comments are obviously off the cuff remarks over being frustrated, and she got screwed over by a system that punishes speech.</p><p>Anyway, chick sounds hot tho.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The comments are obviously off the cuff remarks over being frustrated , and she got screwed over by a system that punishes speech.Anyway , chick sounds hot tho .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The comments are obviously off the cuff remarks over being frustrated, and she got screwed over by a system that punishes speech.Anyway, chick sounds hot tho.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30467794</id>
	<title>How about we test the options?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259678760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm....</p><p>Just to clarify - girl talks about stabbing someone in the neck and death lists, and we're best off ignoring her?<br>Options:<br>a) It's hyperbole, she doesn't mean anything, has to miss a few classes (makes them up later, gets let off coursework, etc) and the school spends a few grand getting someone to talk to her for a while.<br>b) Outside, tiny chance she's unhinged and intends to hurt someone, and eventually does.</p><p>From all the people I've spoken to (lots - I'm in a medical field), a phrase always comes up "I'm glad I did it [counseling], everyone could do with a bit of it..."<br>If she's not homicidal, she'll probably still benefit...</p><p>Logically, if we can afford the counseling, why not do it? Cost is literally the only downside, and the avoidance of that tiny risk, along with mental support for her is a huge upside!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm....Just to clarify - girl talks about stabbing someone in the neck and death lists , and we 're best off ignoring her ? Options : a ) It 's hyperbole , she does n't mean anything , has to miss a few classes ( makes them up later , gets let off coursework , etc ) and the school spends a few grand getting someone to talk to her for a while.b ) Outside , tiny chance she 's unhinged and intends to hurt someone , and eventually does.From all the people I 've spoken to ( lots - I 'm in a medical field ) , a phrase always comes up " I 'm glad I did it [ counseling ] , everyone could do with a bit of it... " If she 's not homicidal , she 'll probably still benefit...Logically , if we can afford the counseling , why not do it ?
Cost is literally the only downside , and the avoidance of that tiny risk , along with mental support for her is a huge upside !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm....Just to clarify - girl talks about stabbing someone in the neck and death lists, and we're best off ignoring her?Options:a) It's hyperbole, she doesn't mean anything, has to miss a few classes (makes them up later, gets let off coursework, etc) and the school spends a few grand getting someone to talk to her for a while.b) Outside, tiny chance she's unhinged and intends to hurt someone, and eventually does.From all the people I've spoken to (lots - I'm in a medical field), a phrase always comes up "I'm glad I did it [counseling], everyone could do with a bit of it..."If she's not homicidal, she'll probably still benefit...Logically, if we can afford the counseling, why not do it?
Cost is literally the only downside, and the avoidance of that tiny risk, along with mental support for her is a huge upside!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463660</id>
	<title>Re:Crazy</title>
	<author>King\_TJ</author>
	<datestamp>1259661120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What "crazy", in my opinion, are all of these people who don't set their privacy settings on Facebook with a bit of care, before spouting off all sorts of random statements!</p><p>I agree with many people here, that her comments sound like venting by a typical angry/exhausted student.  But all I know is, if I was attending school someplace, I sure wouldn't set up my Facebook or MySpace account so my teachers could view my comments!</p><p>Even if you never plan on saying anything negative towards them on there, don't you think it's giving away a bit too much information about your personal life?  As a rule, your professors or teachers are people you essentially HIRED to do the job of teaching you some material.  They're NOT your friends/buddies.</p><p>People who don't know you really well are the most likely to grossly misinterpret your comments, photos or videos you post online....  Why take the risk?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What " crazy " , in my opinion , are all of these people who do n't set their privacy settings on Facebook with a bit of care , before spouting off all sorts of random statements ! I agree with many people here , that her comments sound like venting by a typical angry/exhausted student .
But all I know is , if I was attending school someplace , I sure would n't set up my Facebook or MySpace account so my teachers could view my comments ! Even if you never plan on saying anything negative towards them on there , do n't you think it 's giving away a bit too much information about your personal life ?
As a rule , your professors or teachers are people you essentially HIRED to do the job of teaching you some material .
They 're NOT your friends/buddies.People who do n't know you really well are the most likely to grossly misinterpret your comments , photos or videos you post online.... Why take the risk ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What "crazy", in my opinion, are all of these people who don't set their privacy settings on Facebook with a bit of care, before spouting off all sorts of random statements!I agree with many people here, that her comments sound like venting by a typical angry/exhausted student.
But all I know is, if I was attending school someplace, I sure wouldn't set up my Facebook or MySpace account so my teachers could view my comments!Even if you never plan on saying anything negative towards them on there, don't you think it's giving away a bit too much information about your personal life?
As a rule, your professors or teachers are people you essentially HIRED to do the job of teaching you some material.
They're NOT your friends/buddies.People who don't know you really well are the most likely to grossly misinterpret your comments, photos or videos you post online....  Why take the risk?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462928</id>
	<title>Gee...</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1259658600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have no idea why her boyfriend dumped her.... yikes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have no idea why her boyfriend dumped her.... yikes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have no idea why her boyfriend dumped her.... yikes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463128</id>
	<title>Re:Will people learn to watch what's said online?</title>
	<author>WCguru42</author>
	<datestamp>1259659320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... not have her entire college career ruined.</p> </div><p>Where did it say her college career was ruined.  The article was a total of three paragraphs.  Probably less than 200 words.  She was banned from campus, maybe forever, maybe for a week, who knows.  Banned is not the same as expelled.  Otherwise, your post is very cogent.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... not have her entire college career ruined .
Where did it say her college career was ruined .
The article was a total of three paragraphs .
Probably less than 200 words .
She was banned from campus , maybe forever , maybe for a week , who knows .
Banned is not the same as expelled .
Otherwise , your post is very cogent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... not have her entire college career ruined.
Where did it say her college career was ruined.
The article was a total of three paragraphs.
Probably less than 200 words.
She was banned from campus, maybe forever, maybe for a week, who knows.
Banned is not the same as expelled.
Otherwise, your post is very cogent.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462938</id>
	<title>Re:Obligitory Minority Report comparison.</title>
	<author>Vohar</author>
	<datestamp>1259658600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you get as specific as she did over who, where, when, and how, then yeah. You just might get checked out.</p><p>Course they'll probably realize that you're just some guy making kneejerk reaction about kneejerk reactions. Funny how this thread has been full of pots shouting angrily against kettles for their perceived blackness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you get as specific as she did over who , where , when , and how , then yeah .
You just might get checked out.Course they 'll probably realize that you 're just some guy making kneejerk reaction about kneejerk reactions .
Funny how this thread has been full of pots shouting angrily against kettles for their perceived blackness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you get as specific as she did over who, where, when, and how, then yeah.
You just might get checked out.Course they'll probably realize that you're just some guy making kneejerk reaction about kneejerk reactions.
Funny how this thread has been full of pots shouting angrily against kettles for their perceived blackness.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30472822</id>
	<title>wow... nice there</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261062720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>calling someone a 'dumb bitch' for outbursts that im sure you have never had... or have you?</p><p>mr frowny face?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>calling someone a 'dumb bitch ' for outbursts that im sure you have never had... or have you ? mr frowny face ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>calling someone a 'dumb bitch' for outbursts that im sure you have never had... or have you?mr frowny face?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465370</id>
	<title>Usually Dumb</title>
	<author>b4upoo</author>
	<datestamp>1259666880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>       Schools usually are completely stupid when it comes to handling students. It's a national tradition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Schools usually are completely stupid when it comes to handling students .
It 's a national tradition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>       Schools usually are completely stupid when it comes to handling students.
It's a national tradition.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462856</id>
	<title>Is there ANY venue one can vent?</title>
	<author>flajann</author>
	<datestamp>1259658360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is there ANY venue one can vent without coming under suspicion of violence? I've vented once or twice on Facebook myself, but I am always circumspect as to *how* I vent so no one can take it the wrong way.<p>

Just because one may say, "I feel like killing someone!" does not in anyway mean said person will actually carry it through. It's just  a vent. That's all!</p><p>

And if we kill off places where people can vent safely, some may actually *do* the deed rather than just "scream" the deed.</p><p>

Man, I feel like shoving all the idiots on our planet onto the "B" Ark. No, I'm not serious. Besides, in the case of Earth,that would have to be a very LARGE spaceship. And the billions will most likely not go willingly. Or maybe they would, being the idiots they are and all...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there ANY venue one can vent without coming under suspicion of violence ?
I 've vented once or twice on Facebook myself , but I am always circumspect as to * how * I vent so no one can take it the wrong way .
Just because one may say , " I feel like killing someone !
" does not in anyway mean said person will actually carry it through .
It 's just a vent .
That 's all !
And if we kill off places where people can vent safely , some may actually * do * the deed rather than just " scream " the deed .
Man , I feel like shoving all the idiots on our planet onto the " B " Ark .
No , I 'm not serious .
Besides , in the case of Earth,that would have to be a very LARGE spaceship .
And the billions will most likely not go willingly .
Or maybe they would , being the idiots they are and all.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there ANY venue one can vent without coming under suspicion of violence?
I've vented once or twice on Facebook myself, but I am always circumspect as to *how* I vent so no one can take it the wrong way.
Just because one may say, "I feel like killing someone!
" does not in anyway mean said person will actually carry it through.
It's just  a vent.
That's all!
And if we kill off places where people can vent safely, some may actually *do* the deed rather than just "scream" the deed.
Man, I feel like shoving all the idiots on our planet onto the "B" Ark.
No, I'm not serious.
Besides, in the case of Earth,that would have to be a very LARGE spaceship.
And the billions will most likely not go willingly.
Or maybe they would, being the idiots they are and all...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462740</id>
	<title>The nerve</title>
	<author>antgly</author>
	<datestamp>1259658060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't get it how some people just can't sit down and have a coffee. Who has the time to go through people's Facebook profiles looking for this stuff?
I wonder if the instructors actually taught instead of just surfing and looking for this nonsense.
On whose money were they surfing Facebook? I guess tax money, right.
They should investigate that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't get it how some people just ca n't sit down and have a coffee .
Who has the time to go through people 's Facebook profiles looking for this stuff ?
I wonder if the instructors actually taught instead of just surfing and looking for this nonsense .
On whose money were they surfing Facebook ?
I guess tax money , right .
They should investigate that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't get it how some people just can't sit down and have a coffee.
Who has the time to go through people's Facebook profiles looking for this stuff?
I wonder if the instructors actually taught instead of just surfing and looking for this nonsense.
On whose money were they surfing Facebook?
I guess tax money, right.
They should investigate that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462360</id>
	<title>Re:Crazy</title>
	<author>CrimsonAvenger</author>
	<datestamp>1259700120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So, the Professors were deathly afraid of her morbid comments, which lead to her to be terminated as a student.</p></div></blockquote><p>Please read TFA.  She hasn't been terminated as a student.  She has been banned pending a hearing by the Office for Student Conduct and Academic Integrity, who will then decide whether this is important enough to terminate her.
</p><p>Which latter is unlikely, considering that the police have already talked to her and decided there's nothing worth getting excited about.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the Professors were deathly afraid of her morbid comments , which lead to her to be terminated as a student.Please read TFA .
She has n't been terminated as a student .
She has been banned pending a hearing by the Office for Student Conduct and Academic Integrity , who will then decide whether this is important enough to terminate her .
Which latter is unlikely , considering that the police have already talked to her and decided there 's nothing worth getting excited about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the Professors were deathly afraid of her morbid comments, which lead to her to be terminated as a student.Please read TFA.
She hasn't been terminated as a student.
She has been banned pending a hearing by the Office for Student Conduct and Academic Integrity, who will then decide whether this is important enough to terminate her.
Which latter is unlikely, considering that the police have already talked to her and decided there's nothing worth getting excited about.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462120</id>
	<title>Re:Will people learn to watch what's said online?</title>
	<author>Kyrene</author>
	<datestamp>1259699520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly. You can argue "freedom of speech" all you want, but freedom means responsibility for how people react to what you say.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
You can argue " freedom of speech " all you want , but freedom means responsibility for how people react to what you say .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
You can argue "freedom of speech" all you want, but freedom means responsibility for how people react to what you say.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462684</id>
	<title>insensitive American</title>
	<author>formfeed</author>
	<datestamp>1259701080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> No, I actually mean I'm going to qwerty some bitches foreheads here. Sorry for any confusion.</p></div></blockquote><p> "Qwerty" someone? Ever heard of i18? Not to mention the stupid Dvorak-nerds, they have feelings too! (I think)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , I actually mean I 'm going to qwerty some bitches foreheads here .
Sorry for any confusion .
" Qwerty " someone ?
Ever heard of i18 ?
Not to mention the stupid Dvorak-nerds , they have feelings too !
( I think )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> No, I actually mean I'm going to qwerty some bitches foreheads here.
Sorry for any confusion.
"Qwerty" someone?
Ever heard of i18?
Not to mention the stupid Dvorak-nerds, they have feelings too!
(I think)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463148</id>
	<title>Re:Threats are threats</title>
	<author>jo\_ham</author>
	<datestamp>1259659380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So any time a mother says "I'm going to kill you" in exasperation when their kid does something like spill milk all over the floor for the 50th time the police should come along and ban her from entering her house?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So any time a mother says " I 'm going to kill you " in exasperation when their kid does something like spill milk all over the floor for the 50th time the police should come along and ban her from entering her house ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So any time a mother says "I'm going to kill you" in exasperation when their kid does something like spill milk all over the floor for the 50th time the police should come along and ban her from entering her house?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468894</id>
	<title>No pun intended</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259687400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fixed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fixed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fixed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464536</id>
	<title>Re:Will people learn to watch what's said online?</title>
	<author>Otto</author>
	<datestamp>1259664360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Facebook has, up until now, had an expectation of privacy. Generally, posts on Facebook stay visible only to your friends.</p><p>Facebook did recently change this default setting, however it's only a matter of time before somebody sues hell out of FB for not maintaining their expectations of privacy.</p><p>I'm not saying it's right or wrong, just saying what's gonna happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook has , up until now , had an expectation of privacy .
Generally , posts on Facebook stay visible only to your friends.Facebook did recently change this default setting , however it 's only a matter of time before somebody sues hell out of FB for not maintaining their expectations of privacy.I 'm not saying it 's right or wrong , just saying what 's gon na happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook has, up until now, had an expectation of privacy.
Generally, posts on Facebook stay visible only to your friends.Facebook did recently change this default setting, however it's only a matter of time before somebody sues hell out of FB for not maintaining their expectations of privacy.I'm not saying it's right or wrong, just saying what's gonna happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468576</id>
	<title>Re:Silly.</title>
	<author>Kaenneth</author>
	<datestamp>1259684820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ahh, the classic IBM Model M, a keyboard tough enough to kill a man, and then type his obituary.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model\_M\_keyboard" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model\_M\_keyboard</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahh , the classic IBM Model M , a keyboard tough enough to kill a man , and then type his obituary.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model \ _M \ _keyboard [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahh, the classic IBM Model M, a keyboard tough enough to kill a man, and then type his obituary.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model\_M\_keyboard [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462718</id>
	<title>Boyfriend = Mortuary Prof?</title>
	<author>spleck</author>
	<datestamp>1259658000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if the ex-boyfriend is the mortuary science professor?</p><p>BTW, please read the Star-Tribune account before assuming the Slashdot synopsis is the full account of the FaceBook posting... you know if you're not already trained to not RTFA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if the ex-boyfriend is the mortuary science professor ? BTW , please read the Star-Tribune account before assuming the Slashdot synopsis is the full account of the FaceBook posting... you know if you 're not already trained to not RTFA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if the ex-boyfriend is the mortuary science professor?BTW, please read the Star-Tribune account before assuming the Slashdot synopsis is the full account of the FaceBook posting... you know if you're not already trained to not RTFA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463402</id>
	<title>Re:New medium, Old news</title>
	<author>MightyMartian</author>
	<datestamp>1259660220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Facebook, where all the intellectual exhibitionists live.  Unlike Slashdot, where all the intellectual masturbators live.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook , where all the intellectual exhibitionists live .
Unlike Slashdot , where all the intellectual masturbators live .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook, where all the intellectual exhibitionists live.
Unlike Slashdot, where all the intellectual masturbators live.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462000</id>
	<title>Re:Will people learn to watch what's said online?</title>
	<author>longhairedgnome</author>
	<datestamp>1259699160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wish more people would do this when simply TALKING.  Words are very powerful tools and carefully choosing those words when speaking, either publicly or in private, is just as important when posting typed words online.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish more people would do this when simply TALKING .
Words are very powerful tools and carefully choosing those words when speaking , either publicly or in private , is just as important when posting typed words online .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish more people would do this when simply TALKING.
Words are very powerful tools and carefully choosing those words when speaking, either publicly or in private, is just as important when posting typed words online.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462860</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259658420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <tt>it's ok to say you want the president of the united states dead, but it's NOT ok to say you'd like to stab some asshole who's really asking for it?</tt></p></div> </blockquote><p>You're making the silly assumption that the President isn't asking for it.
</p><p>
By the way, the black guy with the AR15 is the same guy that the left-wing media claimed was at a "racist" tea party rally.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's ok to say you want the president of the united states dead , but it 's NOT ok to say you 'd like to stab some asshole who 's really asking for it ?
You 're making the silly assumption that the President is n't asking for it .
By the way , the black guy with the AR15 is the same guy that the left-wing media claimed was at a " racist " tea party rally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> it's ok to say you want the president of the united states dead, but it's NOT ok to say you'd like to stab some asshole who's really asking for it?
You're making the silly assumption that the President isn't asking for it.
By the way, the black guy with the AR15 is the same guy that the left-wing media claimed was at a "racist" tea party rally.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30466216</id>
	<title>Re:For whatever reason?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259669760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>why would you embalm someone you're going to secretly cremate?  the remarks simply don't add up to even a likely hood of actual intent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why would you embalm someone you 're going to secretly cremate ?
the remarks simply do n't add up to even a likely hood of actual intent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why would you embalm someone you're going to secretly cremate?
the remarks simply don't add up to even a likely hood of actual intent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30469148</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>Ozlanthos</author>
	<datestamp>1259689200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unless you are obscenely rich and famous....then you can easily shake it off as having been  a publicity stunt. Remember the mantra "no news is bad news".
<br>
<br>
-Oz</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless you are obscenely rich and famous....then you can easily shake it off as having been a publicity stunt .
Remember the mantra " no news is bad news " .
-Oz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless you are obscenely rich and famous....then you can easily shake it off as having been  a publicity stunt.
Remember the mantra "no news is bad news".
-Oz</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462278</id>
	<title>Is anyone else...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is anyone else turned on right now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is anyone else turned on right now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is anyone else turned on right now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468856</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>Demonantis</author>
	<datestamp>1259687100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More of a shit did I say that out loud?</htmltext>
<tokenext>More of a shit did I say that out loud ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More of a shit did I say that out loud?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30470552</id>
	<title>Silence ..... I KILL YOU !!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261040640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uwOL4rB-go&amp;feature=related</p><p>Sometimes threatening to kill someone is actually very funny.</p><p>And hat tip to Monty Python's "It's a flesh wound"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 1uwOL4rB-go&amp;feature = relatedSometimes threatening to kill someone is actually very funny.And hat tip to Monty Python 's " It 's a flesh wound "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uwOL4rB-go&amp;feature=relatedSometimes threatening to kill someone is actually very funny.And hat tip to Monty Python's "It's a flesh wound"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462288</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>threatening to kill someone publicly is never a good idea.</p></div><p>Absolutely.  However, she didn't threaten to kill anyone.  She merely said that she'd LIKE to stab them.  Big difference actually.  One implies that you WILL do it (a threat), the other is simply an expression of anger.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>threatening to kill someone publicly is never a good idea.Absolutely .
However , she did n't threaten to kill anyone .
She merely said that she 'd LIKE to stab them .
Big difference actually .
One implies that you WILL do it ( a threat ) , the other is simply an expression of anger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>threatening to kill someone publicly is never a good idea.Absolutely.
However, she didn't threaten to kill anyone.
She merely said that she'd LIKE to stab them.
Big difference actually.
One implies that you WILL do it (a threat), the other is simply an expression of anger.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465694</id>
	<title>Re:Will people learn to watch what's said online?</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1259667780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This whole thing makes me want to create a black hole that sucks the entire Earth into it. Oh wait, no, I wasn't threatening to do so, wait, it was only a jo</htmltext>
<tokenext>This whole thing makes me want to create a black hole that sucks the entire Earth into it .
Oh wait , no , I was n't threatening to do so , wait , it was only a jo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This whole thing makes me want to create a black hole that sucks the entire Earth into it.
Oh wait, no, I wasn't threatening to do so, wait, it was only a jo</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30467476</id>
	<title>Re:Look...</title>
	<author>cffrost</author>
	<datestamp>1259676660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We can't have it both ways.</p></div><p>Sure we can; it's called "security theater."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We ca n't have it both ways.Sure we can ; it 's called " security theater .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We can't have it both ways.Sure we can; it's called "security theater.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465214</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259666400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oblig. Clue quote:</p><p>Mrs. White: We had had a very humiliating public confrontation, he was deranged, lunatic. He didn't actually seem to like me very much... he had threatened to kill me in public.<br>Miss Scarlet: Why would he want to kill you in public?<br>Wadsworth: I think she meant he threatened, in public, to kill her.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oblig .
Clue quote : Mrs. White : We had had a very humiliating public confrontation , he was deranged , lunatic .
He did n't actually seem to like me very much... he had threatened to kill me in public.Miss Scarlet : Why would he want to kill you in public ? Wadsworth : I think she meant he threatened , in public , to kill her .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oblig.
Clue quote:Mrs. White: We had had a very humiliating public confrontation, he was deranged, lunatic.
He didn't actually seem to like me very much... he had threatened to kill me in public.Miss Scarlet: Why would he want to kill you in public?Wadsworth: I think she meant he threatened, in public, to kill her.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464302</id>
	<title>legit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259663520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am all about the 1st Amendment and the Freedom of speech.  When this student said where, when, and how she was gonna carry out what she said this became a legitamate threat in my opinion.  All that was open to interpretation was who.  It would be unwise to let any threat with that amount of info to go unnoticed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am all about the 1st Amendment and the Freedom of speech .
When this student said where , when , and how she was gon na carry out what she said this became a legitamate threat in my opinion .
All that was open to interpretation was who .
It would be unwise to let any threat with that amount of info to go unnoticed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am all about the 1st Amendment and the Freedom of speech.
When this student said where, when, and how she was gonna carry out what she said this became a legitamate threat in my opinion.
All that was open to interpretation was who.
It would be unwise to let any threat with that amount of info to go unnoticed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461840</id>
	<title>treat as public</title>
	<author>fyoder</author>
	<datestamp>1259698680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't matter what your account settings are, treat everything you post to facebook as public.  It's worse than email, and you want to be careful of what you send in those as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't matter what your account settings are , treat everything you post to facebook as public .
It 's worse than email , and you want to be careful of what you send in those as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't matter what your account settings are, treat everything you post to facebook as public.
It's worse than email, and you want to be careful of what you send in those as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462476</id>
	<title>Freedom of Speech Should Prevail</title>
	<author>dikdik</author>
	<datestamp>1259700480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No matter what the circumstances, no matter what the fora, and no matter what, I think that Freedom of Speech is to be protected. Any attempt at stifling it with whatever justification is the first step towards a slippery slope leading to authoritarian rule and erosion of all kinds of privacy and freedoms...albeit this could take many decades to actually happen.
<p>
If the erosion of freedoms starts now, I fear that by the time I die, the world will be much, much different from the heydays of the internet when everything was open and without restrictions...I fear that we will have a very strict and monitored society where your every move will be logged and your every thought will be scrutinized for compliance with the dominant peoples' satisfaction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No matter what the circumstances , no matter what the fora , and no matter what , I think that Freedom of Speech is to be protected .
Any attempt at stifling it with whatever justification is the first step towards a slippery slope leading to authoritarian rule and erosion of all kinds of privacy and freedoms...albeit this could take many decades to actually happen .
If the erosion of freedoms starts now , I fear that by the time I die , the world will be much , much different from the heydays of the internet when everything was open and without restrictions...I fear that we will have a very strict and monitored society where your every move will be logged and your every thought will be scrutinized for compliance with the dominant peoples ' satisfaction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No matter what the circumstances, no matter what the fora, and no matter what, I think that Freedom of Speech is to be protected.
Any attempt at stifling it with whatever justification is the first step towards a slippery slope leading to authoritarian rule and erosion of all kinds of privacy and freedoms...albeit this could take many decades to actually happen.
If the erosion of freedoms starts now, I fear that by the time I die, the world will be much, much different from the heydays of the internet when everything was open and without restrictions...I fear that we will have a very strict and monitored society where your every move will be logged and your every thought will be scrutinized for compliance with the dominant peoples' satisfaction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462584</id>
	<title>In other news</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1259700780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Steve Ballmer has been banned from all Google offices due to his public statements that "I'm going to kill fucking Google!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Steve Ballmer has been banned from all Google offices due to his public statements that " I 'm going to kill fucking Google !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Steve Ballmer has been banned from all Google offices due to his public statements that "I'm going to kill fucking Google!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464594</id>
	<title>Re:Will people learn to watch what's said online?</title>
	<author>Chapter80</author>
	<datestamp>1259664540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>It's a shame. What she needed was to be forced to attend counseling, not have her entire college career ruined. But maybe people will learn from her mistake.</p></div><p>Learn what?  Last time I checked, saying "I want to stab someone in the throat" is different from:</p><p>a.  Stabbing someone in the throat</p><p>b.  Threatening to stab someone in the throat</p><p>c.  Planning to stab someone in the throat</p><p>d.  Having any intentions of stabbing someone in the throat, at all</p><p>e.  Being capable of stabbing someone in the throat</p><p>I really want to take all your mod points. Quick, ban me for hacking!</p></div><p>All good points.  But as a hiring manager, I WILL research candidates on the internet prior to extending an offer.  And, given two equally qualified candidates, but one got a lot of notoriety for saying something stupid in a very public way, and another who didn't, I will likely take the person who doesn't have the troubled past.</p><p>I see the distinctions that you are making, but I do not want the burden to have to explain it to potential clients.</p><p>Imagine people avoiding my Funeral Home because I employ a troublemaker.  It costs ME business.  And so, right or wrong, it's a justifiable business decision not to hire this person.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a shame .
What she needed was to be forced to attend counseling , not have her entire college career ruined .
But maybe people will learn from her mistake.Learn what ?
Last time I checked , saying " I want to stab someone in the throat " is different from : a. Stabbing someone in the throatb .
Threatening to stab someone in the throatc .
Planning to stab someone in the throatd .
Having any intentions of stabbing someone in the throat , at alle .
Being capable of stabbing someone in the throatI really want to take all your mod points .
Quick , ban me for hacking ! All good points .
But as a hiring manager , I WILL research candidates on the internet prior to extending an offer .
And , given two equally qualified candidates , but one got a lot of notoriety for saying something stupid in a very public way , and another who did n't , I will likely take the person who does n't have the troubled past.I see the distinctions that you are making , but I do not want the burden to have to explain it to potential clients.Imagine people avoiding my Funeral Home because I employ a troublemaker .
It costs ME business .
And so , right or wrong , it 's a justifiable business decision not to hire this person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a shame.
What she needed was to be forced to attend counseling, not have her entire college career ruined.
But maybe people will learn from her mistake.Learn what?
Last time I checked, saying "I want to stab someone in the throat" is different from:a.  Stabbing someone in the throatb.
Threatening to stab someone in the throatc.
Planning to stab someone in the throatd.
Having any intentions of stabbing someone in the throat, at alle.
Being capable of stabbing someone in the throatI really want to take all your mod points.
Quick, ban me for hacking!All good points.
But as a hiring manager, I WILL research candidates on the internet prior to extending an offer.
And, given two equally qualified candidates, but one got a lot of notoriety for saying something stupid in a very public way, and another who didn't, I will likely take the person who doesn't have the troubled past.I see the distinctions that you are making, but I do not want the burden to have to explain it to potential clients.Imagine people avoiding my Funeral Home because I employ a troublemaker.
It costs ME business.
And so, right or wrong, it's a justifiable business decision not to hire this person.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465142</id>
	<title>Facebook is real</title>
	<author>findoutmoretoday</author>
	<datestamp>1259666280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>If not for those stories Facebook would seem socially irrelevant.<br><br>Hear hear,&nbsp; Facebook changed his-her life (now buy the book).</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>If not for those stories Facebook would seem socially irrelevant.Hear hear ,   Facebook changed his-her life ( now buy the book ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If not for those stories Facebook would seem socially irrelevant.Hear hear,  Facebook changed his-her life (now buy the book).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461850</id>
	<title>Modern times</title>
	<author>fastest fascist</author>
	<datestamp>1259698740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>A society that expects a group of people to judge the actions of other people, but is too large to allow these people to know each other well enough to be able to make such judgement combined with an increasing amount of private information being publicly communicated = recipe for trouble.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A society that expects a group of people to judge the actions of other people , but is too large to allow these people to know each other well enough to be able to make such judgement combined with an increasing amount of private information being publicly communicated = recipe for trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A society that expects a group of people to judge the actions of other people, but is too large to allow these people to know each other well enough to be able to make such judgement combined with an increasing amount of private information being publicly communicated = recipe for trouble.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463418</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259660280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While it was legal for that guy to bring that weapon to the rally, it was foolish and stupid, especially given the proximity to the president.  The reporting on it was equally stupid, particularly when they edited the footage to hide his hands and face, then proceeded to call him a white man.  His skin color was irrelevant.  Intentionally misreporting it was just race baiting.</p><p>And no, it's not a good idea to say you want the president dead.  That's the sort of thing that gets you prison time.  Presidents get special treatment in this way; a mere threat, even if it's not credible, is a crime.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While it was legal for that guy to bring that weapon to the rally , it was foolish and stupid , especially given the proximity to the president .
The reporting on it was equally stupid , particularly when they edited the footage to hide his hands and face , then proceeded to call him a white man .
His skin color was irrelevant .
Intentionally misreporting it was just race baiting.And no , it 's not a good idea to say you want the president dead .
That 's the sort of thing that gets you prison time .
Presidents get special treatment in this way ; a mere threat , even if it 's not credible , is a crime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While it was legal for that guy to bring that weapon to the rally, it was foolish and stupid, especially given the proximity to the president.
The reporting on it was equally stupid, particularly when they edited the footage to hide his hands and face, then proceeded to call him a white man.
His skin color was irrelevant.
Intentionally misreporting it was just race baiting.And no, it's not a good idea to say you want the president dead.
That's the sort of thing that gets you prison time.
Presidents get special treatment in this way; a mere threat, even if it's not credible, is a crime.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464436</id>
	<title>Re:Is there ANY venue one can vent?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Better to train yourself to not need venting.   Obviously.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Better to train yourself to not need venting .
Obviously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better to train yourself to not need venting.
Obviously.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462612</id>
	<title>Re:mortuary science?</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1259700840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>On the contrary, I'd say it's quite the active field; people are dying to get in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>On the contrary , I 'd say it 's quite the active field ; people are dying to get in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the contrary, I'd say it's quite the active field; people are dying to get in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461836</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462348</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259700060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>threatening to kill someone publicly is never a good idea.</p></div><p>People say stupid things when they're angry. Everybody knows this, and in a normal and well-adjusted society where we calmly and rationally look at the available facts, we'd remember this. Motive and means, those are the questions nobody asks -- because when you have a zero tolerance policy you don't have to ask questions anymore. Zero tolerance policies aren't there to keep you safe -- it's there to keep the administration safe.</p><p>I often joke about sucking out people's souls, or asking friends if they'll need help moving the body of whomever they're annoyed with, or any one of a dozen other euphemisms for killing, death, destruction, mayhem, etc. Why? Because conjuring up mental imagery of the object of our anger in pain and suffering is carthetic. We bond with our friends over our mutual dislike of others -- establishing an us and a them. It's not politically vogue to acknowledge this aspect of the human condition, but it's something we all do to varying degrees <i>and it's healthy.</i></p><p>If we can't laugh at ourselves as a society -- if we can't let some things go and just say "Okay, maybe that was a bit much. Let's not do that next time," then we're setting ourselves up for a very big fall. I've seen what happens when people straightjacket themselves into not showing negative emotions. They look fine, right up until they snap. And then a whole bunch of people get hurt (or even killed) because today was the day they decided to make their own personal, Custerian stand against the world over some stupid, minor thing.</p><p>And the really sad part about it is -- when people do snap, we demonize them. They were sick and twisted individuals, and absolutely nothing like you and I. Bullshit -- they were exactly like you and me. They just couldn't take it anymore, whereas you and I, we're willing to keep our heads down, smile, and pretend nothing at all is wrong. And die a little inside each day for it. We're all victims in this. All of us.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>threatening to kill someone publicly is never a good idea.People say stupid things when they 're angry .
Everybody knows this , and in a normal and well-adjusted society where we calmly and rationally look at the available facts , we 'd remember this .
Motive and means , those are the questions nobody asks -- because when you have a zero tolerance policy you do n't have to ask questions anymore .
Zero tolerance policies are n't there to keep you safe -- it 's there to keep the administration safe.I often joke about sucking out people 's souls , or asking friends if they 'll need help moving the body of whomever they 're annoyed with , or any one of a dozen other euphemisms for killing , death , destruction , mayhem , etc .
Why ? Because conjuring up mental imagery of the object of our anger in pain and suffering is carthetic .
We bond with our friends over our mutual dislike of others -- establishing an us and a them .
It 's not politically vogue to acknowledge this aspect of the human condition , but it 's something we all do to varying degrees and it 's healthy.If we ca n't laugh at ourselves as a society -- if we ca n't let some things go and just say " Okay , maybe that was a bit much .
Let 's not do that next time , " then we 're setting ourselves up for a very big fall .
I 've seen what happens when people straightjacket themselves into not showing negative emotions .
They look fine , right up until they snap .
And then a whole bunch of people get hurt ( or even killed ) because today was the day they decided to make their own personal , Custerian stand against the world over some stupid , minor thing.And the really sad part about it is -- when people do snap , we demonize them .
They were sick and twisted individuals , and absolutely nothing like you and I. Bullshit -- they were exactly like you and me .
They just could n't take it anymore , whereas you and I , we 're willing to keep our heads down , smile , and pretend nothing at all is wrong .
And die a little inside each day for it .
We 're all victims in this .
All of us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>threatening to kill someone publicly is never a good idea.People say stupid things when they're angry.
Everybody knows this, and in a normal and well-adjusted society where we calmly and rationally look at the available facts, we'd remember this.
Motive and means, those are the questions nobody asks -- because when you have a zero tolerance policy you don't have to ask questions anymore.
Zero tolerance policies aren't there to keep you safe -- it's there to keep the administration safe.I often joke about sucking out people's souls, or asking friends if they'll need help moving the body of whomever they're annoyed with, or any one of a dozen other euphemisms for killing, death, destruction, mayhem, etc.
Why? Because conjuring up mental imagery of the object of our anger in pain and suffering is carthetic.
We bond with our friends over our mutual dislike of others -- establishing an us and a them.
It's not politically vogue to acknowledge this aspect of the human condition, but it's something we all do to varying degrees and it's healthy.If we can't laugh at ourselves as a society -- if we can't let some things go and just say "Okay, maybe that was a bit much.
Let's not do that next time," then we're setting ourselves up for a very big fall.
I've seen what happens when people straightjacket themselves into not showing negative emotions.
They look fine, right up until they snap.
And then a whole bunch of people get hurt (or even killed) because today was the day they decided to make their own personal, Custerian stand against the world over some stupid, minor thing.And the really sad part about it is -- when people do snap, we demonize them.
They were sick and twisted individuals, and absolutely nothing like you and I. Bullshit -- they were exactly like you and me.
They just couldn't take it anymore, whereas you and I, we're willing to keep our heads down, smile, and pretend nothing at all is wrong.
And die a little inside each day for it.
We're all victims in this.
All of us.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30466452</id>
	<title>Re:Look...</title>
	<author>betterunixthanunix</author>
	<datestamp>1259670780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only people who forget how often they say things that can be construed as threats.  I was suspended from my middle school for "threatening" to use a weapon from Star Trek on a teacher; do you really want to walk around terrified to say anything except "Hi," "How are you?" and "Nice weather we're having" because everyone is petrified of each other?<br> <br>

Seriously, her life is pretty much ruined now, regardless of the fact that no charges were filed.  Her name is out there as someone who was in trouble for threatening to stab people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only people who forget how often they say things that can be construed as threats .
I was suspended from my middle school for " threatening " to use a weapon from Star Trek on a teacher ; do you really want to walk around terrified to say anything except " Hi , " " How are you ?
" and " Nice weather we 're having " because everyone is petrified of each other ?
Seriously , her life is pretty much ruined now , regardless of the fact that no charges were filed .
Her name is out there as someone who was in trouble for threatening to stab people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only people who forget how often they say things that can be construed as threats.
I was suspended from my middle school for "threatening" to use a weapon from Star Trek on a teacher; do you really want to walk around terrified to say anything except "Hi," "How are you?
" and "Nice weather we're having" because everyone is petrified of each other?
Seriously, her life is pretty much ruined now, regardless of the fact that no charges were filed.
Her name is out there as someone who was in trouble for threatening to stab people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465330</id>
	<title>Fark</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259666700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.myspace.com/metal\_hottie23" title="myspace.com" rel="nofollow">Metal Hottie 23?</a> [myspace.com]</p><p>I would totally hit<br>slut</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Metal Hottie 23 ?
[ myspace.com ] I would totally hitslut</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Metal Hottie 23?
[myspace.com]I would totally hitslut</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463824</id>
	<title>what's next</title>
	<author>Alvaro Martinez</author>
	<datestamp>1259661840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>in 6 months listening music will be illegal and dangerous, in one year thinking wil be a threat,</htmltext>
<tokenext>in 6 months listening music will be illegal and dangerous , in one year thinking wil be a threat,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in 6 months listening music will be illegal and dangerous, in one year thinking wil be a threat,</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462118</id>
	<title>Re:personal responsibility</title>
	<author>vcgodinich</author>
	<datestamp>1259699460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So you feel that the professors are taking responsibility for destroying a person's college career because she was emotional after a breakup? <p>Please. There was no threat here. You mean to tell me that you have never said anything, even as a joke (embalming therapy) that could be taken out of context and interpreted to imply physical violence? You are fooling yourself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you feel that the professors are taking responsibility for destroying a person 's college career because she was emotional after a breakup ?
Please. There was no threat here .
You mean to tell me that you have never said anything , even as a joke ( embalming therapy ) that could be taken out of context and interpreted to imply physical violence ?
You are fooling yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you feel that the professors are taking responsibility for destroying a person's college career because she was emotional after a breakup?
Please. There was no threat here.
You mean to tell me that you have never said anything, even as a joke (embalming therapy) that could be taken out of context and interpreted to imply physical violence?
You are fooling yourself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462490</id>
	<title>Appropriate first step</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259700540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Having police question her and check her for weapons? That's a safety precaution and appropriate.<br> <br>Banning her from the campus? Not so much. <br>I could understand if, after police had questioned her, they felt she was a justifiable risk to campus security, but TFA states that they "consider the matter closed" and aren't filing any charges. Because of this, I don't really think a ban from campus was appropriate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having police question her and check her for weapons ?
That 's a safety precaution and appropriate .
Banning her from the campus ?
Not so much .
I could understand if , after police had questioned her , they felt she was a justifiable risk to campus security , but TFA states that they " consider the matter closed " and are n't filing any charges .
Because of this , I do n't really think a ban from campus was appropriate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having police question her and check her for weapons?
That's a safety precaution and appropriate.
Banning her from the campus?
Not so much.
I could understand if, after police had questioned her, they felt she was a justifiable risk to campus security, but TFA states that they "consider the matter closed" and aren't filing any charges.
Because of this, I don't really think a ban from campus was appropriate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463982</id>
	<title>Re:Will people learn to watch what's said online?</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1259662440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Read the Star-Tribune link at the bottom of the summary.  She didn't stop at "I want to...".  Not even close.  Her statements appear to meet the criteria for (b), (c), and (d) of your list above.  She also claims (e).  The only thing that never happened was (a), and we'll honestly never know her intent.  Was she stating actual intent or blowing off steam?  Tough decision for school admins and the cops to make when they are looking at text on a screen.</p><p>So, yeah, next time she learns that saying that she's looking forward to stabbing someone in the throat with a tocar during class and theorizing on how she might get rid of the body is probably not a well-chosen public statement to make.</p><p>The school admins may have overreacted, but if so they overreacted by adding too much credibility to a pretty clear threatening statement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Read the Star-Tribune link at the bottom of the summary .
She did n't stop at " I want to... " .
Not even close .
Her statements appear to meet the criteria for ( b ) , ( c ) , and ( d ) of your list above .
She also claims ( e ) .
The only thing that never happened was ( a ) , and we 'll honestly never know her intent .
Was she stating actual intent or blowing off steam ?
Tough decision for school admins and the cops to make when they are looking at text on a screen.So , yeah , next time she learns that saying that she 's looking forward to stabbing someone in the throat with a tocar during class and theorizing on how she might get rid of the body is probably not a well-chosen public statement to make.The school admins may have overreacted , but if so they overreacted by adding too much credibility to a pretty clear threatening statement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read the Star-Tribune link at the bottom of the summary.
She didn't stop at "I want to...".
Not even close.
Her statements appear to meet the criteria for (b), (c), and (d) of your list above.
She also claims (e).
The only thing that never happened was (a), and we'll honestly never know her intent.
Was she stating actual intent or blowing off steam?
Tough decision for school admins and the cops to make when they are looking at text on a screen.So, yeah, next time she learns that saying that she's looking forward to stabbing someone in the throat with a tocar during class and theorizing on how she might get rid of the body is probably not a well-chosen public statement to make.The school admins may have overreacted, but if so they overreacted by adding too much credibility to a pretty clear threatening statement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461836</id>
	<title>mortuary science?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>Its a dead field.<br><br>/Sorry, had to be done.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its a dead field./Sorry , had to be done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its a dead field./Sorry, had to be done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462170</id>
	<title>It's not Facebook that's the problem</title>
	<author>MattskEE</author>
	<datestamp>1259699640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you say things like that you need to be careful of your audience.  This applies whether or not you are joking.  If she had said it out loud and the wrong person overhead, the same thing would have happened.  Posting it on Facebook just means that all 300 of her "friends" can "overhear" her - and maybe more depending on her privacy settings.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you say things like that you need to be careful of your audience .
This applies whether or not you are joking .
If she had said it out loud and the wrong person overhead , the same thing would have happened .
Posting it on Facebook just means that all 300 of her " friends " can " overhear " her - and maybe more depending on her privacy settings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you say things like that you need to be careful of your audience.
This applies whether or not you are joking.
If she had said it out loud and the wrong person overhead, the same thing would have happened.
Posting it on Facebook just means that all 300 of her "friends" can "overhear" her - and maybe more depending on her privacy settings.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468002</id>
	<title>Re:Look...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259680020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No one against the banning here is saying they want it "both ways," rather we find it wrong that this person's life could be destroyed due to an honest mistake (that is assuming she was just joking, I can't know for sure and neither can you). Yes, the threats were worth looking into. No, they were not worth stopping the girl from completing her education. Instead of using these ridiculous social formulas that the U.S. seems to champion, why not use logic, reason, and context to make the correct decision? A headline that read "Girl found psychotic after investigation spurred by Facebook posts" would be good publicity because the university did the right thing. This was handled terribly by the university's administration, and I for one will be writing a letter to the campus criticizing their knee-jerk and anti-student reaction to the situation.</p><p>Off topic but I feel compelled: Fuck all of you who call the U.S. "America." We steal the land from the natives, then steal a name from two continents, God we're awesome. The U.S. is not America. The U.S. citizens are not Americans. Why is it okay for us to say this? What about Canadians, aren't they Americans too? Mexicans? Yep, they're all full-blooded Americans in my book. Most of the western hemisphere's population is American yet our inflated heads have been blind to this misnomer for<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... forever? I know a word can have multiple meanings, but using "America" to describe the U.S. is perpetuating the country's rape of the world's culture and I can't stand for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one against the banning here is saying they want it " both ways , " rather we find it wrong that this person 's life could be destroyed due to an honest mistake ( that is assuming she was just joking , I ca n't know for sure and neither can you ) .
Yes , the threats were worth looking into .
No , they were not worth stopping the girl from completing her education .
Instead of using these ridiculous social formulas that the U.S. seems to champion , why not use logic , reason , and context to make the correct decision ?
A headline that read " Girl found psychotic after investigation spurred by Facebook posts " would be good publicity because the university did the right thing .
This was handled terribly by the university 's administration , and I for one will be writing a letter to the campus criticizing their knee-jerk and anti-student reaction to the situation.Off topic but I feel compelled : Fuck all of you who call the U.S .
" America. " We steal the land from the natives , then steal a name from two continents , God we 're awesome .
The U.S. is not America .
The U.S. citizens are not Americans .
Why is it okay for us to say this ?
What about Canadians , are n't they Americans too ?
Mexicans ? Yep , they 're all full-blooded Americans in my book .
Most of the western hemisphere 's population is American yet our inflated heads have been blind to this misnomer for ... forever ? I know a word can have multiple meanings , but using " America " to describe the U.S. is perpetuating the country 's rape of the world 's culture and I ca n't stand for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one against the banning here is saying they want it "both ways," rather we find it wrong that this person's life could be destroyed due to an honest mistake (that is assuming she was just joking, I can't know for sure and neither can you).
Yes, the threats were worth looking into.
No, they were not worth stopping the girl from completing her education.
Instead of using these ridiculous social formulas that the U.S. seems to champion, why not use logic, reason, and context to make the correct decision?
A headline that read "Girl found psychotic after investigation spurred by Facebook posts" would be good publicity because the university did the right thing.
This was handled terribly by the university's administration, and I for one will be writing a letter to the campus criticizing their knee-jerk and anti-student reaction to the situation.Off topic but I feel compelled: Fuck all of you who call the U.S.
"America." We steal the land from the natives, then steal a name from two continents, God we're awesome.
The U.S. is not America.
The U.S. citizens are not Americans.
Why is it okay for us to say this?
What about Canadians, aren't they Americans too?
Mexicans? Yep, they're all full-blooded Americans in my book.
Most of the western hemisphere's population is American yet our inflated heads have been blind to this misnomer for ... forever? I know a word can have multiple meanings, but using "America" to describe the U.S. is perpetuating the country's rape of the world's culture and I can't stand for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462260</id>
	<title>mortuary science student?</title>
	<author>SteveWoz</author>
	<datestamp>1259699880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She was considering an extra-curricular project.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She was considering an extra-curricular project .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She was considering an extra-curricular project.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465450</id>
	<title>Re:Look...</title>
	<author>JesseMcDonald</author>
	<datestamp>1259667120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We can't have it both ways.</p></div><p>Sure "we" can. There are lots of different individuals here, with plenty of room for differing opinions.</p><p>You're committing the fallacy of assuming that the existence of an apparent consensus at one point in time (among those being modded up) implies that <em>everyone</em> participating in this forum must share that consensus. In practice the consensus can and does change radically over time without any individual poster trying to "have it both ways".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We ca n't have it both ways.Sure " we " can .
There are lots of different individuals here , with plenty of room for differing opinions.You 're committing the fallacy of assuming that the existence of an apparent consensus at one point in time ( among those being modded up ) implies that everyone participating in this forum must share that consensus .
In practice the consensus can and does change radically over time without any individual poster trying to " have it both ways " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We can't have it both ways.Sure "we" can.
There are lots of different individuals here, with plenty of room for differing opinions.You're committing the fallacy of assuming that the existence of an apparent consensus at one point in time (among those being modded up) implies that everyone participating in this forum must share that consensus.
In practice the consensus can and does change radically over time without any individual poster trying to "have it both ways".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30466338</id>
	<title>Re:Will people learn to watch what's said online?</title>
	<author>jrumney</author>
	<datestamp>1259670300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Learn to keep your facebook postings private and not friend your professors and other people you don't really consider as friends in real life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Learn to keep your facebook postings private and not friend your professors and other people you do n't really consider as friends in real life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Learn to keep your facebook postings private and not friend your professors and other people you don't really consider as friends in real life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462214</id>
	<title>When will people learn...</title>
	<author>gizmo2199</author>
	<datestamp>1259699760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Facebook is not your Personal Army!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    Facebook is not your Personal Army !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    Facebook is not your Personal Army!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461936</id>
	<title>New medium, Old news</title>
	<author>228e2</author>
	<datestamp>1259699040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A student made threatening statements and was barred from going to the place where she admitted she will preform said actions. Nothing new.

<br> <br>
It was made on her public fb profile (private or public doesnt actually matter) would hold the same weight if she were to write it in her non-digital diary I would say.<br> <br> <br>

But on a lighter subject, I think a 29 year old would be too old to 'rage' like that over facebook. Something I would expect out of a high schooler =\</htmltext>
<tokenext>A student made threatening statements and was barred from going to the place where she admitted she will preform said actions .
Nothing new .
It was made on her public fb profile ( private or public doesnt actually matter ) would hold the same weight if she were to write it in her non-digital diary I would say .
But on a lighter subject , I think a 29 year old would be too old to 'rage ' like that over facebook .
Something I would expect out of a high schooler = \</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A student made threatening statements and was barred from going to the place where she admitted she will preform said actions.
Nothing new.
It was made on her public fb profile (private or public doesnt actually matter) would hold the same weight if she were to write it in her non-digital diary I would say.
But on a lighter subject, I think a 29 year old would be too old to 'rage' like that over facebook.
Something I would expect out of a high schooler =\</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462200</id>
	<title>Re:Pathetic...</title>
	<author>Wyatt Earp</author>
	<datestamp>1259699760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Free Speech has limits and this sort of speech has been limited since at least 1919</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent\_lawless\_action" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent\_lawless\_action</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Free Speech has limits and this sort of speech has been limited since at least 1919http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent \ _lawless \ _action [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free Speech has limits and this sort of speech has been limited since at least 1919http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent\_lawless\_action [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462064</id>
	<title>Re:New medium, Old news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A student made threatening <b>statements</b> and was barred from going to the place where she <b>admitted she will preform</b> said actions.</p></div><p>Umm, just curious - exactly how did you go from "threatening statements" to "will preform" (sic).</p><p>That's a pretty damn big leap, comrade.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A student made threatening statements and was barred from going to the place where she admitted she will preform said actions.Umm , just curious - exactly how did you go from " threatening statements " to " will preform " ( sic ) .That 's a pretty damn big leap , comrade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A student made threatening statements and was barred from going to the place where she admitted she will preform said actions.Umm, just curious - exactly how did you go from "threatening statements" to "will preform" (sic).That's a pretty damn big leap, comrade.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462844</id>
	<title>Doin It Wrong</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1259658360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You ban her student from campus?</p><p>If it's a public university, then lol u gonna get sued.</p><p>The only thing that should have happened was a temporary restraining order against her (from the ex).</p><p>I didn't RTFA so I don't know whether or not it happened, but I'm going to assume it didn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ban her student from campus ? If it 's a public university , then lol u gon na get sued.The only thing that should have happened was a temporary restraining order against her ( from the ex ) .I did n't RTFA so I do n't know whether or not it happened , but I 'm going to assume it did n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You ban her student from campus?If it's a public university, then lol u gonna get sued.The only thing that should have happened was a temporary restraining order against her (from the ex).I didn't RTFA so I don't know whether or not it happened, but I'm going to assume it didn't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464528</id>
	<title>Re:Look...</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1259664300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If she actually DID the kill the poor sap, and we find out that she posted about it beforehand on her FB page, everyone would be up in arms... "Why didn't someone do something about it?  This could have been prevented!"</p><p>We can't have it both ways.</p></div><p>Only someone engaging in over-generalization would find this surprising or logically suspect.  Rephrase without it, "a bunch of people would be up in arms", and suddenly it doesn't seem surprising that no matter which way you go, a bunch of people will be up in arms that it wasn't handled the other way.  The trick is, they're not the same people.  Well, except for the occasional exceptional idiot.</p><p>(What continually amazes me is how often people assert "everybody" thinks something or other when a vocal minority is loud enough.  It's <i>impossible</i> to determine what the majority thinks based on forum comments, or news reports.  What the majority of forum comments say tells you NOTHING about what the majority thinks.  It provides <i>absolutely no data at all whatsoever</i> on <i>that</i> particular question.  Likewise, the majority of news reports and the slant of their presentation.)</p><p>(BTW, if you want to spot an idiot on Slashdot, ask them what the majority of Slashdot readers think about some issue.  If they answer something other than, "I don't know," you know they're an idiot.  If they qualify it with "the majority of <i>commenters</i>", they're still idiots, but less idiotic.  They begin to show intelligence when they say, "the majority of people who chose to comment on that particular story", a subgroup that is a minority of Slashdot commenters, and a tiny minority of Slashdot readers.  Trying to generalize from that proves only that the person is too stupid to understand why generalizing from a <i>self-selected</i> minority is really, really dumb.  Anyone that gullible will believe anything...)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If she actually DID the kill the poor sap , and we find out that she posted about it beforehand on her FB page , everyone would be up in arms... " Why did n't someone do something about it ?
This could have been prevented !
" We ca n't have it both ways.Only someone engaging in over-generalization would find this surprising or logically suspect .
Rephrase without it , " a bunch of people would be up in arms " , and suddenly it does n't seem surprising that no matter which way you go , a bunch of people will be up in arms that it was n't handled the other way .
The trick is , they 're not the same people .
Well , except for the occasional exceptional idiot .
( What continually amazes me is how often people assert " everybody " thinks something or other when a vocal minority is loud enough .
It 's impossible to determine what the majority thinks based on forum comments , or news reports .
What the majority of forum comments say tells you NOTHING about what the majority thinks .
It provides absolutely no data at all whatsoever on that particular question .
Likewise , the majority of news reports and the slant of their presentation .
) ( BTW , if you want to spot an idiot on Slashdot , ask them what the majority of Slashdot readers think about some issue .
If they answer something other than , " I do n't know , " you know they 're an idiot .
If they qualify it with " the majority of commenters " , they 're still idiots , but less idiotic .
They begin to show intelligence when they say , " the majority of people who chose to comment on that particular story " , a subgroup that is a minority of Slashdot commenters , and a tiny minority of Slashdot readers .
Trying to generalize from that proves only that the person is too stupid to understand why generalizing from a self-selected minority is really , really dumb .
Anyone that gullible will believe anything... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If she actually DID the kill the poor sap, and we find out that she posted about it beforehand on her FB page, everyone would be up in arms... "Why didn't someone do something about it?
This could have been prevented!
"We can't have it both ways.Only someone engaging in over-generalization would find this surprising or logically suspect.
Rephrase without it, "a bunch of people would be up in arms", and suddenly it doesn't seem surprising that no matter which way you go, a bunch of people will be up in arms that it wasn't handled the other way.
The trick is, they're not the same people.
Well, except for the occasional exceptional idiot.
(What continually amazes me is how often people assert "everybody" thinks something or other when a vocal minority is loud enough.
It's impossible to determine what the majority thinks based on forum comments, or news reports.
What the majority of forum comments say tells you NOTHING about what the majority thinks.
It provides absolutely no data at all whatsoever on that particular question.
Likewise, the majority of news reports and the slant of their presentation.
)(BTW, if you want to spot an idiot on Slashdot, ask them what the majority of Slashdot readers think about some issue.
If they answer something other than, "I don't know," you know they're an idiot.
If they qualify it with "the majority of commenters", they're still idiots, but less idiotic.
They begin to show intelligence when they say, "the majority of people who chose to comment on that particular story", a subgroup that is a minority of Slashdot commenters, and a tiny minority of Slashdot readers.
Trying to generalize from that proves only that the person is too stupid to understand why generalizing from a self-selected minority is really, really dumb.
Anyone that gullible will believe anything...)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462224</id>
	<title>Re:Will people learn to watch what's said online?</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1259699820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> What she needed was to be forced to attend counseling.</p></div><p>For someone who manages their words with care, those are some pretty strong words. What if you go back to school and a loved one passes away. Would you then condone them forcing you to attend counseling?</p><p>(PS - I agree with everything else, it's silly to think that death threats on the net, real or not, wouldn't be taken seriously)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What she needed was to be forced to attend counseling.For someone who manages their words with care , those are some pretty strong words .
What if you go back to school and a loved one passes away .
Would you then condone them forcing you to attend counseling ?
( PS - I agree with everything else , it 's silly to think that death threats on the net , real or not , would n't be taken seriously )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> What she needed was to be forced to attend counseling.For someone who manages their words with care, those are some pretty strong words.
What if you go back to school and a loved one passes away.
Would you then condone them forcing you to attend counseling?
(PS - I agree with everything else, it's silly to think that death threats on the net, real or not, wouldn't be taken seriously)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462674</id>
	<title>No school administrator has been fired</title>
	<author>bzzfzz</author>
	<datestamp>1259701020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No school administrator has ever been fired, or even ended up with a public relations problem, for overreacting to a threat from a student.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No school administrator has ever been fired , or even ended up with a public relations problem , for overreacting to a threat from a student .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No school administrator has ever been fired, or even ended up with a public relations problem, for overreacting to a threat from a student.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30478650</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>holmstar</author>
	<datestamp>1261042860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but her later statement, that she was looking forward to her embalming therapy, suggested that she was considering following through with her desire.  Also, if she hadn't been so coy about who she desired to kill, ie "I still want to stab my ex-boyfriend in the neck... "  rather than "a certain someone" I doubt this would have been such a big deal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>but her later statement , that she was looking forward to her embalming therapy , suggested that she was considering following through with her desire .
Also , if she had n't been so coy about who she desired to kill , ie " I still want to stab my ex-boyfriend in the neck... " rather than " a certain someone " I doubt this would have been such a big deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but her later statement, that she was looking forward to her embalming therapy, suggested that she was considering following through with her desire.
Also, if she hadn't been so coy about who she desired to kill, ie "I still want to stab my ex-boyfriend in the neck... "  rather than "a certain someone" I doubt this would have been such a big deal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464500</id>
	<title>anything you say can and will be used against you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so never say anything online that can be traced back to you</p><p>"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him."</p><p>it is human nature, you do something others don't like, and they will use whatever power they have to harm you</p><p>this woman said something those with power over her didn't like, they used their power to harm her</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so never say anything online that can be traced back to you " If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men , I will find something in them which will hang him .
" it is human nature , you do something others do n't like , and they will use whatever power they have to harm youthis woman said something those with power over her did n't like , they used their power to harm her</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so never say anything online that can be traced back to you"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him.
"it is human nature, you do something others don't like, and they will use whatever power they have to harm youthis woman said something those with power over her didn't like, they used their power to harm her</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468376</id>
	<title>Re:John T. K.</title>
	<author>/dev/trash</author>
	<datestamp>1259682960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you ever seen funeral directors homes and cars?  These people are rolling in money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you ever seen funeral directors homes and cars ?
These people are rolling in money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you ever seen funeral directors homes and cars?
These people are rolling in money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30467448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462132</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1259699520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless the plan is to raise suspicion...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless the plan is to raise suspicion.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless the plan is to raise suspicion...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30466104</id>
	<title>Anyone remember...</title>
	<author>Bones3D\_mac</author>
	<datestamp>1259669220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... back when a conversation would simply "die" after whatever dumbass comment was made on impulse during a brief moment of frustration?</p><p>Nowadays, we're all expected to bottle our emotions, letting them slowly fester into a mental illness that could eventually result in a random explosion of violent behavior toward anyone who might rub you the wrong way at just the right moment.</p><p>Knee-jerk reactions to off-color commentary made to a completely unrelated audience are likely going to be the cause of several future columbine-like incidences. And why? Because you can't give anyone even the slightest bit of breathing room to themselves.</p><p>The internet may have brought the world closer together, but perhaps that difference is starting to make a number of us feel claustrophobic.</p><p>Also, how do such comments reach such seemingly unrelated audiences? Is it just coincidence, or is someone constantly watching this person for some specific purpose?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... back when a conversation would simply " die " after whatever dumbass comment was made on impulse during a brief moment of frustration ? Nowadays , we 're all expected to bottle our emotions , letting them slowly fester into a mental illness that could eventually result in a random explosion of violent behavior toward anyone who might rub you the wrong way at just the right moment.Knee-jerk reactions to off-color commentary made to a completely unrelated audience are likely going to be the cause of several future columbine-like incidences .
And why ?
Because you ca n't give anyone even the slightest bit of breathing room to themselves.The internet may have brought the world closer together , but perhaps that difference is starting to make a number of us feel claustrophobic.Also , how do such comments reach such seemingly unrelated audiences ?
Is it just coincidence , or is someone constantly watching this person for some specific purpose ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... back when a conversation would simply "die" after whatever dumbass comment was made on impulse during a brief moment of frustration?Nowadays, we're all expected to bottle our emotions, letting them slowly fester into a mental illness that could eventually result in a random explosion of violent behavior toward anyone who might rub you the wrong way at just the right moment.Knee-jerk reactions to off-color commentary made to a completely unrelated audience are likely going to be the cause of several future columbine-like incidences.
And why?
Because you can't give anyone even the slightest bit of breathing room to themselves.The internet may have brought the world closer together, but perhaps that difference is starting to make a number of us feel claustrophobic.Also, how do such comments reach such seemingly unrelated audiences?
Is it just coincidence, or is someone constantly watching this person for some specific purpose?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</id>
	<title>never a good plan</title>
	<author>farble1670</author>
	<datestamp>1259698740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>threatening to kill someone publicly is never a good idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>threatening to kill someone publicly is never a good idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>threatening to kill someone publicly is never a good idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463130</id>
	<title>Re:Silly.</title>
	<author>langelgjm</author>
	<datestamp>1259659320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No, I actually mean I'm going to qwerty some bitches foreheads here. Sorry for any confusion.</p></div><p>See, if you had said you were going to <i>dvorak</i> some bitches, then the authorities would have known you must be maladjusted and unstable.</p><p>What's that noise? Oh, I'm just tapping my keyboard. Aoeu, aoeu, aoeu... </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , I actually mean I 'm going to qwerty some bitches foreheads here .
Sorry for any confusion.See , if you had said you were going to dvorak some bitches , then the authorities would have known you must be maladjusted and unstable.What 's that noise ?
Oh , I 'm just tapping my keyboard .
Aoeu , aoeu , aoeu.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, I actually mean I'm going to qwerty some bitches foreheads here.
Sorry for any confusion.See, if you had said you were going to dvorak some bitches, then the authorities would have known you must be maladjusted and unstable.What's that noise?
Oh, I'm just tapping my keyboard.
Aoeu, aoeu, aoeu... 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462590</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>GryMor</author>
	<datestamp>1259700780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A desire is not an intent, plan nor threat. It is against societal interests to directly punish people for their desires as doing so will curtail their honest expressions of those desires through words rather than actions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A desire is not an intent , plan nor threat .
It is against societal interests to directly punish people for their desires as doing so will curtail their honest expressions of those desires through words rather than actions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A desire is not an intent, plan nor threat.
It is against societal interests to directly punish people for their desires as doing so will curtail their honest expressions of those desires through words rather than actions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465358</id>
	<title>obsolete</title>
	<author>woodsworth</author>
	<datestamp>1259666820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why do we keep getting these facebook stories?

I felt like there's general agreement on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. that a) using facebook isn't the most clever career move and b) that the world is full of morons who don't understand that things you post on the Internet might actually be read by somebody.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do we keep getting these facebook stories ?
I felt like there 's general agreement on / .
that a ) using facebook is n't the most clever career move and b ) that the world is full of morons who do n't understand that things you post on the Internet might actually be read by somebody .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do we keep getting these facebook stories?
I felt like there's general agreement on /.
that a) using facebook isn't the most clever career move and b) that the world is full of morons who don't understand that things you post on the Internet might actually be read by somebody.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462266</id>
	<title>Look...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If she actually DID the kill the poor sap, and we find out that she posted about it beforehand on her FB page, everyone would be up in arms... "Why didn't someone do something about it?  This could have been prevented!"</p><p>We can't have it both ways.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If she actually DID the kill the poor sap , and we find out that she posted about it beforehand on her FB page , everyone would be up in arms... " Why did n't someone do something about it ?
This could have been prevented !
" We ca n't have it both ways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If she actually DID the kill the poor sap, and we find out that she posted about it beforehand on her FB page, everyone would be up in arms... "Why didn't someone do something about it?
This could have been prevented!
"We can't have it both ways.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461792</id>
	<title>First kike!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>jews did WTC</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>jews did WTC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>jews did WTC</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461986</id>
	<title>what happened to her PC?</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1259699100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought the standard operating procedure was to shoo three bullet through her laptop. What happened to that? Once the laptop is shot the person would have been rendered harmless and she could attend class with the embalming tool,</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the standard operating procedure was to shoo three bullet through her laptop .
What happened to that ?
Once the laptop is shot the person would have been rendered harmless and she could attend class with the embalming tool,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the standard operating procedure was to shoo three bullet through her laptop.
What happened to that?
Once the laptop is shot the person would have been rendered harmless and she could attend class with the embalming tool,</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461904</id>
	<title>Crazy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, the Professors were deathly afraid of her morbid comments, which lead to her to be terminated as a student. I don't think she should have undertaken her commenting to that level. I just wish that the professors would just bury the hatchet and let her rest in peace.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the Professors were deathly afraid of her morbid comments , which lead to her to be terminated as a student .
I do n't think she should have undertaken her commenting to that level .
I just wish that the professors would just bury the hatchet and let her rest in peace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the Professors were deathly afraid of her morbid comments, which lead to her to be terminated as a student.
I don't think she should have undertaken her commenting to that level.
I just wish that the professors would just bury the hatchet and let her rest in peace.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465752</id>
	<title>Yawn...This again?</title>
	<author>aitikin</author>
	<datestamp>1259667960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This happened at Eastern Illinois University sometime last year.  It was even worse at EIU as the reason the student was banned and expelled was his status saying, "[on Tuesday] things are going down."  That Tuesday happened to be his birthday, with a big party going on at the bowling alley.  There also happened to be a major sports conference going on Tuesday night.  Simply outrageous action, but...

That being said, everything that can be found on the subject has very little to do with what the university states and is almost entirely heresy from the banned former student as the university's policy is to not comment on such occurrences and EIU's journalism is not necessarily the best.  Links posted below for interested parties to follow:

<a href="http://media.www.dennews.com/media/storage/paper309/news/2009/03/03/News/33.Update.Student.Banned.From.Campus.For.Allegedly.Posting.Threats-3656537.shtml" title="dennews.com" rel="nofollow">http://media.www.dennews.com/media/storage/paper309/news/2009/03/03/News/33.Update.Student.Banned.From.Campus.For.Allegedly.Posting.Threats-3656537.shtml</a> [dennews.com]

<a href="http://media.www.dennews.com/media/storage/paper309/news/2009/03/04/News/Student.Threat.Was.A.Misunderstanding-3658414.shtml" title="dennews.com" rel="nofollow">http://media.www.dennews.com/media/storage/paper309/news/2009/03/04/News/Student.Threat.Was.A.Misunderstanding-3658414.shtml</a> [dennews.com]

<a href="http://media.www.dennews.com/media/storage/paper309/news/2009/03/05/Opinions/Editorial.Walkers.Banning.Leaves.Questions.Unanswered-3660348.shtml" title="dennews.com" rel="nofollow">http://media.www.dennews.com/media/storage/paper309/news/2009/03/05/Opinions/Editorial.Walkers.Banning.Leaves.Questions.Unanswered-3660348.shtml</a> [dennews.com]

Yeah, break ups happen and making some statement about how much you want to kill your ex happen as well, not that we would know as we all are on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. but still.  When someone gets banned and expelled for saying, "in five days things are going down," something's really wrong.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This happened at Eastern Illinois University sometime last year .
It was even worse at EIU as the reason the student was banned and expelled was his status saying , " [ on Tuesday ] things are going down .
" That Tuesday happened to be his birthday , with a big party going on at the bowling alley .
There also happened to be a major sports conference going on Tuesday night .
Simply outrageous action , but.. . That being said , everything that can be found on the subject has very little to do with what the university states and is almost entirely heresy from the banned former student as the university 's policy is to not comment on such occurrences and EIU 's journalism is not necessarily the best .
Links posted below for interested parties to follow : http : //media.www.dennews.com/media/storage/paper309/news/2009/03/03/News/33.Update.Student.Banned.From.Campus.For.Allegedly.Posting.Threats-3656537.shtml [ dennews.com ] http : //media.www.dennews.com/media/storage/paper309/news/2009/03/04/News/Student.Threat.Was.A.Misunderstanding-3658414.shtml [ dennews.com ] http : //media.www.dennews.com/media/storage/paper309/news/2009/03/05/Opinions/Editorial.Walkers.Banning.Leaves.Questions.Unanswered-3660348.shtml [ dennews.com ] Yeah , break ups happen and making some statement about how much you want to kill your ex happen as well , not that we would know as we all are on / .
but still .
When someone gets banned and expelled for saying , " in five days things are going down , " something 's really wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This happened at Eastern Illinois University sometime last year.
It was even worse at EIU as the reason the student was banned and expelled was his status saying, "[on Tuesday] things are going down.
"  That Tuesday happened to be his birthday, with a big party going on at the bowling alley.
There also happened to be a major sports conference going on Tuesday night.
Simply outrageous action, but...

That being said, everything that can be found on the subject has very little to do with what the university states and is almost entirely heresy from the banned former student as the university's policy is to not comment on such occurrences and EIU's journalism is not necessarily the best.
Links posted below for interested parties to follow:

http://media.www.dennews.com/media/storage/paper309/news/2009/03/03/News/33.Update.Student.Banned.From.Campus.For.Allegedly.Posting.Threats-3656537.shtml [dennews.com]

http://media.www.dennews.com/media/storage/paper309/news/2009/03/04/News/Student.Threat.Was.A.Misunderstanding-3658414.shtml [dennews.com]

http://media.www.dennews.com/media/storage/paper309/news/2009/03/05/Opinions/Editorial.Walkers.Banning.Leaves.Questions.Unanswered-3660348.shtml [dennews.com]

Yeah, break ups happen and making some statement about how much you want to kill your ex happen as well, not that we would know as we all are on /.
but still.
When someone gets banned and expelled for saying, "in five days things are going down," something's really wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463074</id>
	<title>Re:Obligitory Minority Report comparison.</title>
	<author>kainewynd2</author>
	<datestamp>1259659080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>News @ 11:</p><p> <b>BREAKING NEWS:</b> </p><p>Posting under the Slashdot alias, one Jacob Sims, aka <a href="http://slashdot.org/~ground.zero.612" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">ground.zero.612</a> [slashdot.org], made inflammatory remarks to the University of Minnesota Campus Police and a certain "Professor Dipshit."  Following this, Mr. Sims was found bound and gagged, bent over a park bench with a sign hanging about his neck stating: "Free ride for the po-po."<br>
We would post photos, but... well, please think of the children.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>News @ 11 : BREAKING NEWS : Posting under the Slashdot alias , one Jacob Sims , aka ground.zero.612 [ slashdot.org ] , made inflammatory remarks to the University of Minnesota Campus Police and a certain " Professor Dipshit .
" Following this , Mr. Sims was found bound and gagged , bent over a park bench with a sign hanging about his neck stating : " Free ride for the po-po .
" We would post photos , but... well , please think of the children .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>News @ 11: BREAKING NEWS: Posting under the Slashdot alias, one Jacob Sims, aka ground.zero.612 [slashdot.org], made inflammatory remarks to the University of Minnesota Campus Police and a certain "Professor Dipshit.
"  Following this, Mr. Sims was found bound and gagged, bent over a park bench with a sign hanging about his neck stating: "Free ride for the po-po.
"
We would post photos, but... well, please think of the children.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464386</id>
	<title>Re:mortuary science?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259663880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And stabbing someone in the throat to get out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And stabbing someone in the throat to get out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And stabbing someone in the throat to get out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461832</id>
	<title>Silly.</title>
	<author>TaggartAleslayer</author>
	<datestamp>1259698680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This whole thing makes me want to beat someone in the face with a keyboard. I'm looking forward to Tomorrow's "development therapy".</p><p>No, I actually mean I'm going to qwerty some bitches foreheads here. Sorry for any confusion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This whole thing makes me want to beat someone in the face with a keyboard .
I 'm looking forward to Tomorrow 's " development therapy " .No , I actually mean I 'm going to qwerty some bitches foreheads here .
Sorry for any confusion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This whole thing makes me want to beat someone in the face with a keyboard.
I'm looking forward to Tomorrow's "development therapy".No, I actually mean I'm going to qwerty some bitches foreheads here.
Sorry for any confusion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465296</id>
	<title>I joke about raping girls that reject me!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259666640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, when a girl rejects me it pisses me off so much that I make jokes about how I'm going to knock them out with my baseball bat and rape them.</p><p>So far I've been put into solitary incarceration, but I'm looking to have a woman join me soon for joking about cutting the throat of the guy that dumped her. Or not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , when a girl rejects me it pisses me off so much that I make jokes about how I 'm going to knock them out with my baseball bat and rape them.So far I 've been put into solitary incarceration , but I 'm looking to have a woman join me soon for joking about cutting the throat of the guy that dumped her .
Or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, when a girl rejects me it pisses me off so much that I make jokes about how I'm going to knock them out with my baseball bat and rape them.So far I've been put into solitary incarceration, but I'm looking to have a woman join me soon for joking about cutting the throat of the guy that dumped her.
Or not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464280</id>
	<title>Obvious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259663460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget the obvious...how did someone even notice her comment on facebook? My guess is she is one of those network hungry people who just friend everyone. That will teach her. Choose who you let in your facebook carefully, your privacy settings carefully, and don't stay stupid things. Keep those for yourself.</p><p>Personally I would like to see her hire a lawyer and sue the university. I could not possibly see the legal justification for terminating a student who paid tuition over a social media comment. Pretty sure that would be considered a drastic measure and overstepping the universities authority. Would make for a great media story!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget the obvious...how did someone even notice her comment on facebook ?
My guess is she is one of those network hungry people who just friend everyone .
That will teach her .
Choose who you let in your facebook carefully , your privacy settings carefully , and do n't stay stupid things .
Keep those for yourself.Personally I would like to see her hire a lawyer and sue the university .
I could not possibly see the legal justification for terminating a student who paid tuition over a social media comment .
Pretty sure that would be considered a drastic measure and overstepping the universities authority .
Would make for a great media story !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget the obvious...how did someone even notice her comment on facebook?
My guess is she is one of those network hungry people who just friend everyone.
That will teach her.
Choose who you let in your facebook carefully, your privacy settings carefully, and don't stay stupid things.
Keep those for yourself.Personally I would like to see her hire a lawyer and sue the university.
I could not possibly see the legal justification for terminating a student who paid tuition over a social media comment.
Pretty sure that would be considered a drastic measure and overstepping the universities authority.
Would make for a great media story!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30548192</id>
	<title>Re:Is there ANY venue one can vent?</title>
	<author>flajann</author>
	<datestamp>1261661160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sure, there are lots of places.</p><p>-In your residence
-In your car
-In email to your friends/family
-On the phone to your friends/family
-In person with your friends/family.</p><p>Venting on Facebook is more like going to Times Square and shouting out loud that you want to kill somebody. Don't be surprised when someone calls the police.</p><p>Lots has been written about people today failing to comprehend the line between public and private and the consequences thereof, so I don't need to add to it. I'll just say that Facebook is public, not private, and that public actions will have public consequences.</p></div><p>Facebook is both, actually. It can be public or private, depending on how you set your visibility and who your FB friends are.</p><p>

The Public is paranoid to the max.Sometimes an innocent statement or action can be taken out of context or misinterpreted, resulting in all sorts of problems.</p><p>

So what to do? Stay walled in and never venture out? People will sometimes dial 911 even if they *think* you're up to no good, or because they don't like the way you look, even if you haven't said a word! This happened to me 10 years ago, and I sued and won. But lots of damage was done, despite winning the lawsuit.</p><p>

The Public must become educated as to when and when not to dial 911. And if someone dials 911 when it was unwarranted, that person should be made to face consequences. Period. Because false accusations can be devastating. </p><p>

You should be concerned that anyone -- any stranger -- can dial 911 on you and complicate your life greatly. You can be completely innocent. You can be completely quiet and civil. You can have done nothing wrong whatsoever. It doesn't matter.</p><p>

There are certain word combinations I am afraid to utter in public, even in jest. Someone, somewhere might misinterpret them and dial away, leaving me left holding the bag. This is NOT the type of society I want to live in, and yet we do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , there are lots of places.-In your residence -In your car -In email to your friends/family -On the phone to your friends/family -In person with your friends/family.Venting on Facebook is more like going to Times Square and shouting out loud that you want to kill somebody .
Do n't be surprised when someone calls the police.Lots has been written about people today failing to comprehend the line between public and private and the consequences thereof , so I do n't need to add to it .
I 'll just say that Facebook is public , not private , and that public actions will have public consequences.Facebook is both , actually .
It can be public or private , depending on how you set your visibility and who your FB friends are .
The Public is paranoid to the max.Sometimes an innocent statement or action can be taken out of context or misinterpreted , resulting in all sorts of problems .
So what to do ?
Stay walled in and never venture out ?
People will sometimes dial 911 even if they * think * you 're up to no good , or because they do n't like the way you look , even if you have n't said a word !
This happened to me 10 years ago , and I sued and won .
But lots of damage was done , despite winning the lawsuit .
The Public must become educated as to when and when not to dial 911 .
And if someone dials 911 when it was unwarranted , that person should be made to face consequences .
Period. Because false accusations can be devastating .
You should be concerned that anyone -- any stranger -- can dial 911 on you and complicate your life greatly .
You can be completely innocent .
You can be completely quiet and civil .
You can have done nothing wrong whatsoever .
It does n't matter .
There are certain word combinations I am afraid to utter in public , even in jest .
Someone , somewhere might misinterpret them and dial away , leaving me left holding the bag .
This is NOT the type of society I want to live in , and yet we do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, there are lots of places.-In your residence
-In your car
-In email to your friends/family
-On the phone to your friends/family
-In person with your friends/family.Venting on Facebook is more like going to Times Square and shouting out loud that you want to kill somebody.
Don't be surprised when someone calls the police.Lots has been written about people today failing to comprehend the line between public and private and the consequences thereof, so I don't need to add to it.
I'll just say that Facebook is public, not private, and that public actions will have public consequences.Facebook is both, actually.
It can be public or private, depending on how you set your visibility and who your FB friends are.
The Public is paranoid to the max.Sometimes an innocent statement or action can be taken out of context or misinterpreted, resulting in all sorts of problems.
So what to do?
Stay walled in and never venture out?
People will sometimes dial 911 even if they *think* you're up to no good, or because they don't like the way you look, even if you haven't said a word!
This happened to me 10 years ago, and I sued and won.
But lots of damage was done, despite winning the lawsuit.
The Public must become educated as to when and when not to dial 911.
And if someone dials 911 when it was unwarranted, that person should be made to face consequences.
Period. Because false accusations can be devastating.
You should be concerned that anyone -- any stranger -- can dial 911 on you and complicate your life greatly.
You can be completely innocent.
You can be completely quiet and civil.
You can have done nothing wrong whatsoever.
It doesn't matter.
There are certain word combinations I am afraid to utter in public, even in jest.
Someone, somewhere might misinterpret them and dial away, leaving me left holding the bag.
This is NOT the type of society I want to live in, and yet we do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462720</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>JaWiB</author>
	<datestamp>1259658000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why would you want to kill someone in public?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would you want to kill someone in public ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would you want to kill someone in public?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462114</id>
	<title>Obligitory Minority Report comparison.</title>
	<author>ground.zero.612</author>
	<datestamp>1259699460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, thinking about committing a crime is now the same as actually committing a crime?</p><p>I'm NOT posting anonymously because I live in Minnesota, and I'm going to say "I am thinking about stabbing the U of M Campus Police, as well as the Professor Dipshit that called them about this."</p><p>

I fucking DARE you to come harass me over this post. I FUCKING DARE YOU.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , thinking about committing a crime is now the same as actually committing a crime ? I 'm NOT posting anonymously because I live in Minnesota , and I 'm going to say " I am thinking about stabbing the U of M Campus Police , as well as the Professor Dipshit that called them about this .
" I fucking DARE you to come harass me over this post .
I FUCKING DARE YOU .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, thinking about committing a crime is now the same as actually committing a crime?I'm NOT posting anonymously because I live in Minnesota, and I'm going to say "I am thinking about stabbing the U of M Campus Police, as well as the Professor Dipshit that called them about this.
"

I fucking DARE you to come harass me over this post.
I FUCKING DARE YOU.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463830</id>
	<title>Re:Obligitory Minority Report comparison.</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1259661840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I fucking DARE you to come harass me over this post. I FUCKING DARE YOU.</p><p>OK, but at least make your posts paint the same picture you are comparing them to...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"I am thinking about stabbing the U of M Campus Police, as well as the Professor Dipshit that called them about this."</p></div><p>Now follow that up with a post that says you are "looking forward to my Campus Police therapy at 10AM tomorrow morning using a large knife to the throat followed shortly by some Dipshit Therapy and I really hope people give me a lot of room because I have a severe amount of aggression I am bringing to the therapy."</p><p>Then start talking about how you might dispose of the bodies.</p><p>It's not that she said she was thinking about it.  She said she was LOOKING FORWARD to it.  Very large difference between "I'd like to" and "I'm looking forward to"</p><p>The school admins and the police may have overreacted, that's arguable, but they were not reacting to a thought.  They were reacting to a statement of intent.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I fucking DARE you to come harass me over this post .
I FUCKING DARE YOU.OK , but at least make your posts paint the same picture you are comparing them to... " I am thinking about stabbing the U of M Campus Police , as well as the Professor Dipshit that called them about this .
" Now follow that up with a post that says you are " looking forward to my Campus Police therapy at 10AM tomorrow morning using a large knife to the throat followed shortly by some Dipshit Therapy and I really hope people give me a lot of room because I have a severe amount of aggression I am bringing to the therapy .
" Then start talking about how you might dispose of the bodies.It 's not that she said she was thinking about it .
She said she was LOOKING FORWARD to it .
Very large difference between " I 'd like to " and " I 'm looking forward to " The school admins and the police may have overreacted , that 's arguable , but they were not reacting to a thought .
They were reacting to a statement of intent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I fucking DARE you to come harass me over this post.
I FUCKING DARE YOU.OK, but at least make your posts paint the same picture you are comparing them to..."I am thinking about stabbing the U of M Campus Police, as well as the Professor Dipshit that called them about this.
"Now follow that up with a post that says you are "looking forward to my Campus Police therapy at 10AM tomorrow morning using a large knife to the throat followed shortly by some Dipshit Therapy and I really hope people give me a lot of room because I have a severe amount of aggression I am bringing to the therapy.
"Then start talking about how you might dispose of the bodies.It's not that she said she was thinking about it.
She said she was LOOKING FORWARD to it.
Very large difference between "I'd like to" and "I'm looking forward to"The school admins and the police may have overreacted, that's arguable, but they were not reacting to a thought.
They were reacting to a statement of intent.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463992</id>
	<title>Re:Freedom of Speech Should Prevail</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1259662440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery\_slope" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery\_slope</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>How could a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. member be ignorant of a committing a fallacy esp. when they use its name in the commission? i have to wonder if you are trolling.  Most rational people,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.er or not, understand that freedoms are never absolute, they require responsibility.  Free speech doesn't protect criminal behavior: libel, slander, endangerment, inciting violence/criminal behavior or making threats. Freedoms are never absolute.  It's part of the social contract.  If you want to be around other people you forfeit part of your rights.  If you want to HAVE rights, you forfeit some of your rights.</p><p>Threatening to kill someone is illegal pretty much everywhere in the US.</p><p>If this person was just talking smack, she'll be on her way soon.  She should be a grown up about it and accept that what she did was wrong AND stupid.  If she was planning to harm/kill someone... off to the pokey.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery \ _slope [ wikipedia.org ] How could a / .
member be ignorant of a committing a fallacy esp .
when they use its name in the commission ?
i have to wonder if you are trolling .
Most rational people , /.er or not , understand that freedoms are never absolute , they require responsibility .
Free speech does n't protect criminal behavior : libel , slander , endangerment , inciting violence/criminal behavior or making threats .
Freedoms are never absolute .
It 's part of the social contract .
If you want to be around other people you forfeit part of your rights .
If you want to HAVE rights , you forfeit some of your rights.Threatening to kill someone is illegal pretty much everywhere in the US.If this person was just talking smack , she 'll be on her way soon .
She should be a grown up about it and accept that what she did was wrong AND stupid .
If she was planning to harm/kill someone... off to the pokey .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery\_slope [wikipedia.org]How could a /.
member be ignorant of a committing a fallacy esp.
when they use its name in the commission?
i have to wonder if you are trolling.
Most rational people, /.er or not, understand that freedoms are never absolute, they require responsibility.
Free speech doesn't protect criminal behavior: libel, slander, endangerment, inciting violence/criminal behavior or making threats.
Freedoms are never absolute.
It's part of the social contract.
If you want to be around other people you forfeit part of your rights.
If you want to HAVE rights, you forfeit some of your rights.Threatening to kill someone is illegal pretty much everywhere in the US.If this person was just talking smack, she'll be on her way soon.
She should be a grown up about it and accept that what she did was wrong AND stupid.
If she was planning to harm/kill someone... off to the pokey.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465590</id>
	<title>Re:mortuary science?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259667420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, no, no.  That's *grave filling*.  Nobody's dying to get into mortuary science.  They wouldn't be able to hold the equipment!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , no , no .
That 's * grave filling * .
Nobody 's dying to get into mortuary science .
They would n't be able to hold the equipment !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, no, no.
That's *grave filling*.
Nobody's dying to get into mortuary science.
They wouldn't be able to hold the equipment!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462562</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259700720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yet how many people say, "I am going to kill Joe for telling you about me dancing naked on the table?" or something similar when all the person means is "I am upset with Joe for telling you about me dancing naked on the table."</p><p>By the way, I am going to kill the original poster. Ha!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet how many people say , " I am going to kill Joe for telling you about me dancing naked on the table ?
" or something similar when all the person means is " I am upset with Joe for telling you about me dancing naked on the table .
" By the way , I am going to kill the original poster .
Ha ! ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet how many people say, "I am going to kill Joe for telling you about me dancing naked on the table?
" or something similar when all the person means is "I am upset with Joe for telling you about me dancing naked on the table.
"By the way, I am going to kill the original poster.
Ha! ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463946</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1259662320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I often joke about sucking out people's souls, or asking friends if they'll need help moving the body of whomever they're annoyed with, or any one of a dozen other euphemisms for killing, death, destruction, mayhem, etc.</p></div><p>The key word is &ldquo;friends&rdquo;. People who know you well enough to understand that you are joking. The average person&rsquo;s Facebook &ldquo;friends&rdquo; are not &ldquo;friends&rdquo; in anything resembling that sense. It would be very unwise to act similarly around people who don&rsquo;t know you very well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I often joke about sucking out people 's souls , or asking friends if they 'll need help moving the body of whomever they 're annoyed with , or any one of a dozen other euphemisms for killing , death , destruction , mayhem , etc.The key word is    friends    .
People who know you well enough to understand that you are joking .
The average person    s Facebook    friends    are not    friends    in anything resembling that sense .
It would be very unwise to act similarly around people who don    t know you very well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I often joke about sucking out people's souls, or asking friends if they'll need help moving the body of whomever they're annoyed with, or any one of a dozen other euphemisms for killing, death, destruction, mayhem, etc.The key word is “friends”.
People who know you well enough to understand that you are joking.
The average person’s Facebook “friends” are not “friends” in anything resembling that sense.
It would be very unwise to act similarly around people who don’t know you very well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30563108</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261929000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your right, im going to kill Obama the next time i see him!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your right , im going to kill Obama the next time i see him !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your right, im going to kill Obama the next time i see him!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866</id>
	<title>Will people learn to watch what's said online?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, she was upset and "venting" but what you put on the Net stays on the Net. I always treat EVERYTHING I post online as public and manage my words with care, as they may come to haunt me someday.

It's a shame. What she needed was to be forced to attend counseling, not have her entire college career ruined. But maybe people will learn from her mistake.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , she was upset and " venting " but what you put on the Net stays on the Net .
I always treat EVERYTHING I post online as public and manage my words with care , as they may come to haunt me someday .
It 's a shame .
What she needed was to be forced to attend counseling , not have her entire college career ruined .
But maybe people will learn from her mistake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, she was upset and "venting" but what you put on the Net stays on the Net.
I always treat EVERYTHING I post online as public and manage my words with care, as they may come to haunt me someday.
It's a shame.
What she needed was to be forced to attend counseling, not have her entire college career ruined.
But maybe people will learn from her mistake.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462596</id>
	<title>Re:Obligitory Minority Report comparison.</title>
	<author>Dog-Cow</author>
	<datestamp>1259700840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are an idiot.  Truly.</p><p>The United States is a country that has gone through at least 2 shooting rampages by students, one of which took place at a university.</p><p>Anyone who believes that even vaguely credible threats involving students or faculty on school grounds will not be investigated is simply too naive or stupid to bother with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are an idiot .
Truly.The United States is a country that has gone through at least 2 shooting rampages by students , one of which took place at a university.Anyone who believes that even vaguely credible threats involving students or faculty on school grounds will not be investigated is simply too naive or stupid to bother with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are an idiot.
Truly.The United States is a country that has gone through at least 2 shooting rampages by students, one of which took place at a university.Anyone who believes that even vaguely credible threats involving students or faculty on school grounds will not be investigated is simply too naive or stupid to bother with.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461808</id>
	<title>My god.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What the fuck is it that you american's live in such state of paranoia?</p><p>Yes, I understand that you guys have had some gruesome stuff happen at schools and all, but some dark and frustrated writing on a wall is no threat at all. Man, if Nietzche or Sartre studied in today's america, or even burroughs or kerouac, they'd be behind bars by now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What the fuck is it that you american 's live in such state of paranoia ? Yes , I understand that you guys have had some gruesome stuff happen at schools and all , but some dark and frustrated writing on a wall is no threat at all .
Man , if Nietzche or Sartre studied in today 's america , or even burroughs or kerouac , they 'd be behind bars by now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the fuck is it that you american's live in such state of paranoia?Yes, I understand that you guys have had some gruesome stuff happen at schools and all, but some dark and frustrated writing on a wall is no threat at all.
Man, if Nietzche or Sartre studied in today's america, or even burroughs or kerouac, they'd be behind bars by now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30478756</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>holmstar</author>
	<datestamp>1261043220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do you know that there was no motive?  Perhaps there has been some past interaction between teacher and student that could cause the student to overreact.  Means are easy, she was going to a class in a lab where embalming needles would be commonplace.  All she would need to do is pick one up.  <br>
<br>
Granted, it probably isn't likely that any given outburst is going to be acted upon, but if you felt that you were personally the target of a "kill list" of a person whom you don't know very well, would you be able to just brush it off as being no big deal?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you know that there was no motive ?
Perhaps there has been some past interaction between teacher and student that could cause the student to overreact .
Means are easy , she was going to a class in a lab where embalming needles would be commonplace .
All she would need to do is pick one up .
Granted , it probably is n't likely that any given outburst is going to be acted upon , but if you felt that you were personally the target of a " kill list " of a person whom you do n't know very well , would you be able to just brush it off as being no big deal ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you know that there was no motive?
Perhaps there has been some past interaction between teacher and student that could cause the student to overreact.
Means are easy, she was going to a class in a lab where embalming needles would be commonplace.
All she would need to do is pick one up.
Granted, it probably isn't likely that any given outburst is going to be acted upon, but if you felt that you were personally the target of a "kill list" of a person whom you don't know very well, would you be able to just brush it off as being no big deal?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461956</id>
	<title>For whatever reason?</title>
	<author>Deosyne</author>
	<datestamp>1259699040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"For whatever reason, this professor took it personally."</p><p>Hrm, was it the part about stabbing, "a certain someone in the throat with a trocar," or maybe the part about spending, "the evening updating my 'Death List #5' and making friends with the crematory guy," all in the context of, "looking forward to Monday's embalming therapy?" And yet the dumb bitch actually doesn't get it. Being pissy is one thing, making very specific public remarks about killing someone and disposing of the body, on the other hand, pretty much guarantees a visit by the po-po, and not to pat you on your angsty little head and tell you it's going to be OK.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" For whatever reason , this professor took it personally .
" Hrm , was it the part about stabbing , " a certain someone in the throat with a trocar , " or maybe the part about spending , " the evening updating my 'Death List # 5 ' and making friends with the crematory guy , " all in the context of , " looking forward to Monday 's embalming therapy ?
" And yet the dumb bitch actually does n't get it .
Being pissy is one thing , making very specific public remarks about killing someone and disposing of the body , on the other hand , pretty much guarantees a visit by the po-po , and not to pat you on your angsty little head and tell you it 's going to be OK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"For whatever reason, this professor took it personally.
"Hrm, was it the part about stabbing, "a certain someone in the throat with a trocar," or maybe the part about spending, "the evening updating my 'Death List #5' and making friends with the crematory guy," all in the context of, "looking forward to Monday's embalming therapy?
" And yet the dumb bitch actually doesn't get it.
Being pissy is one thing, making very specific public remarks about killing someone and disposing of the body, on the other hand, pretty much guarantees a visit by the po-po, and not to pat you on your angsty little head and tell you it's going to be OK.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462670</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>Yold</author>
	<datestamp>1259701020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is an outside chance that this is a threat... We aren't talking about sociology or math, we are talking about people whose education is centered around death. This obviously is a case of a jest in poor taste rather than terroristic threats. I hope this doesn't result in an expulsion for the lady in question, although I don't think suspension is out of line.</p><p>As a side note, I was educated at and work for the UMN. There are administrators here who thrive on this sort of drama; it makes their otherwise boring routines interesting. From my experience, I'd place the blame 50-50. Half knee-jerk reaction from bored administrators, half stupidity on Amanda's part for not realizing here comments may be taken seriously.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is an outside chance that this is a threat... We are n't talking about sociology or math , we are talking about people whose education is centered around death .
This obviously is a case of a jest in poor taste rather than terroristic threats .
I hope this does n't result in an expulsion for the lady in question , although I do n't think suspension is out of line.As a side note , I was educated at and work for the UMN .
There are administrators here who thrive on this sort of drama ; it makes their otherwise boring routines interesting .
From my experience , I 'd place the blame 50-50 .
Half knee-jerk reaction from bored administrators , half stupidity on Amanda 's part for not realizing here comments may be taken seriously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is an outside chance that this is a threat... We aren't talking about sociology or math, we are talking about people whose education is centered around death.
This obviously is a case of a jest in poor taste rather than terroristic threats.
I hope this doesn't result in an expulsion for the lady in question, although I don't think suspension is out of line.As a side note, I was educated at and work for the UMN.
There are administrators here who thrive on this sort of drama; it makes their otherwise boring routines interesting.
From my experience, I'd place the blame 50-50.
Half knee-jerk reaction from bored administrators, half stupidity on Amanda's part for not realizing here comments may be taken seriously.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464022</id>
	<title>They did the right thing</title>
	<author>savi</author>
	<datestamp>1259662560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I work in education.  If I had a student say they were looking forward to killing someone in my class, I'd be concerned.  And if they DID kill someone in my class, everyone would be posting here saying, "Jeez, didn't you all see the clear signs posted on the internet?  Why didn't anyone do anything?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I work in education .
If I had a student say they were looking forward to killing someone in my class , I 'd be concerned .
And if they DID kill someone in my class , everyone would be posting here saying , " Jeez , did n't you all see the clear signs posted on the internet ?
Why did n't anyone do anything ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I work in education.
If I had a student say they were looking forward to killing someone in my class, I'd be concerned.
And if they DID kill someone in my class, everyone would be posting here saying, "Jeez, didn't you all see the clear signs posted on the internet?
Why didn't anyone do anything?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30467832</id>
	<title>Re:Will people learn to watch what's said online?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259679000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>saying "I want to stab someone in the throat" is different from:</p></div><p>e.  I want to bake a cake and smell roses.</p><p>being a part of a <b>PRIVATE</b> organization is different from being in the public domain where everyone is expected to put up with you. </p><div><p>whining about your personal problems publicly?  Some will empathize, some will ridicule. <b>neither will care tomorrow</b> </p><div><p>oh wait this is slashdot, maybe she can get a date.</p></div></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>saying " I want to stab someone in the throat " is different from : e. I want to bake a cake and smell roses.being a part of a PRIVATE organization is different from being in the public domain where everyone is expected to put up with you .
whining about your personal problems publicly ?
Some will empathize , some will ridicule .
neither will care tomorrow oh wait this is slashdot , maybe she can get a date .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>saying "I want to stab someone in the throat" is different from:e.  I want to bake a cake and smell roses.being a part of a PRIVATE organization is different from being in the public domain where everyone is expected to put up with you.
whining about your personal problems publicly?
Some will empathize, some will ridicule.
neither will care tomorrow oh wait this is slashdot, maybe she can get a date.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462706</id>
	<title>Re:For whatever reason?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259701140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So is your sense of humor broken or just your ability to be tougher than a 29 year old girl.... please move along nothing to see here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So is your sense of humor broken or just your ability to be tougher than a 29 year old girl.... please move along nothing to see here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So is your sense of humor broken or just your ability to be tougher than a 29 year old girl.... please move along nothing to see here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465576</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259667360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it okay to invent completely unrelated positions out of thin air and pretend that someone else stated support for them, effectively lying about their opinions?  You seem to think it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it okay to invent completely unrelated positions out of thin air and pretend that someone else stated support for them , effectively lying about their opinions ?
You seem to think it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it okay to invent completely unrelated positions out of thin air and pretend that someone else stated support for them, effectively lying about their opinions?
You seem to think it is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462648</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259700960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>oh horse shit. next time you're in line at the supermarket tell the other people in line you'd like to stab them and see if they don't take it as a threat.</p><p>tell the cop next time you get a ticket you'd like to stab him and see how far this argument gets you in defending against making a threat on them.</p><p>"judge, i said I'd LIKE to stab them, not that I WOULD stab them, big difference"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>oh horse shit .
next time you 're in line at the supermarket tell the other people in line you 'd like to stab them and see if they do n't take it as a threat.tell the cop next time you get a ticket you 'd like to stab him and see how far this argument gets you in defending against making a threat on them .
" judge , i said I 'd LIKE to stab them , not that I WOULD stab them , big difference "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh horse shit.
next time you're in line at the supermarket tell the other people in line you'd like to stab them and see if they don't take it as a threat.tell the cop next time you get a ticket you'd like to stab him and see how far this argument gets you in defending against making a threat on them.
"judge, i said I'd LIKE to stab them, not that I WOULD stab them, big difference"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462166</id>
	<title>Now Kids</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Repeat after me:</p><p>"The Internet is not Private"<br>"The Internet is not Private"</p><p>Why for God's sake have children become so stupid that they cannot comprehend that making threats on the Internet is no different then making them in a mall? The bathroom stall has a latch on it for "privacy" but yelling "I will kill everyone in this mall" is still gonna land you in jail for making threats.</p><p>Sterilize this moron so she cannot breed, we need to slow down the Idiocracy here pretty soon...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Repeat after me : " The Internet is not Private " " The Internet is not Private " Why for God 's sake have children become so stupid that they can not comprehend that making threats on the Internet is no different then making them in a mall ?
The bathroom stall has a latch on it for " privacy " but yelling " I will kill everyone in this mall " is still gon na land you in jail for making threats.Sterilize this moron so she can not breed , we need to slow down the Idiocracy here pretty soon.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Repeat after me:"The Internet is not Private""The Internet is not Private"Why for God's sake have children become so stupid that they cannot comprehend that making threats on the Internet is no different then making them in a mall?
The bathroom stall has a latch on it for "privacy" but yelling "I will kill everyone in this mall" is still gonna land you in jail for making threats.Sterilize this moron so she cannot breed, we need to slow down the Idiocracy here pretty soon...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462080</id>
	<title>Re:personal responsibility</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And she was a morbituary student making pertinent jokes about her major.  I really don't see the story here, let alone your idea she has to take responsibility for people misinterpreting her words.  Maybe those paranoid professors know something we don't, which we cannot even speculate on.  Until that information (beyond what is written about) is given to us, we cannot judge.  If, and I write this hypothetically, she was mentally unstable and what she wrote just happened to be construable with jokes, then this might be justified.  But what we know only says to me "mobid sense of humor fits morbituary student," and that I will be well prepared if I ever meet one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And she was a morbituary student making pertinent jokes about her major .
I really do n't see the story here , let alone your idea she has to take responsibility for people misinterpreting her words .
Maybe those paranoid professors know something we do n't , which we can not even speculate on .
Until that information ( beyond what is written about ) is given to us , we can not judge .
If , and I write this hypothetically , she was mentally unstable and what she wrote just happened to be construable with jokes , then this might be justified .
But what we know only says to me " mobid sense of humor fits morbituary student , " and that I will be well prepared if I ever meet one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And she was a morbituary student making pertinent jokes about her major.
I really don't see the story here, let alone your idea she has to take responsibility for people misinterpreting her words.
Maybe those paranoid professors know something we don't, which we cannot even speculate on.
Until that information (beyond what is written about) is given to us, we cannot judge.
If, and I write this hypothetically, she was mentally unstable and what she wrote just happened to be construable with jokes, then this might be justified.
But what we know only says to me "mobid sense of humor fits morbituary student," and that I will be well prepared if I ever meet one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462422</id>
	<title>Re:Will people learn to watch what's said online?</title>
	<author>Totenglocke</author>
	<datestamp>1259700300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What they need to learn is that authority figures, especially in the academic world, are power hungry assholes who need someone to take a baseball bat upside their head and put them in their place.</p><p>They knew damn well she wasn't planning on doing anything, they just wanted to remind everyone that they own your ass and you can't take a shit without their permission.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What they need to learn is that authority figures , especially in the academic world , are power hungry assholes who need someone to take a baseball bat upside their head and put them in their place.They knew damn well she was n't planning on doing anything , they just wanted to remind everyone that they own your ass and you ca n't take a shit without their permission .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What they need to learn is that authority figures, especially in the academic world, are power hungry assholes who need someone to take a baseball bat upside their head and put them in their place.They knew damn well she wasn't planning on doing anything, they just wanted to remind everyone that they own your ass and you can't take a shit without their permission.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462726</id>
	<title>Re:never a good plan</title>
	<author>InfinityWpi</author>
	<datestamp>1259658000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would you threaten to 'kill someone in public'?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would you threaten to 'kill someone in public ' ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would you threaten to 'kill someone in public'?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462712</id>
	<title>Re:Pathetic...</title>
	<author>Vohar</author>
	<datestamp>1259701140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She was pretty specific on when, where, and how she said she was going to kill the guy. In class, on a certain day, with an embalming knife. That's enough that authorities -have- to look into it, otherwise they're liable should it turn out to be actual premeditated murder and not just some idiot ranting.</p><p>Read the article and some of what she posted. She brought this on herself.</p><p>Also, there's no 'e' in 'ridiculous'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She was pretty specific on when , where , and how she said she was going to kill the guy .
In class , on a certain day , with an embalming knife .
That 's enough that authorities -have- to look into it , otherwise they 're liable should it turn out to be actual premeditated murder and not just some idiot ranting.Read the article and some of what she posted .
She brought this on herself.Also , there 's no 'e ' in 'ridiculous' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She was pretty specific on when, where, and how she said she was going to kill the guy.
In class, on a certain day, with an embalming knife.
That's enough that authorities -have- to look into it, otherwise they're liable should it turn out to be actual premeditated murder and not just some idiot ranting.Read the article and some of what she posted.
She brought this on herself.Also, there's no 'e' in 'ridiculous'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463984</id>
	<title>Re:Pathetic...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259662440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If she'd just said it, there wouldn't be an issue.  Instead, she published it in an international forum, itemizing what type of actions she'd like to take, without being specific about the person she was talking about.</p><p>This is akin to you publishing a piece in the NY Times about how you'd like to blow up the car of that "annoying someone" and will be looking forward to your visit to the hardware store to pick up some fertilizer later this evening.</p><p>(there... car analogy; we're finished)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If she 'd just said it , there would n't be an issue .
Instead , she published it in an international forum , itemizing what type of actions she 'd like to take , without being specific about the person she was talking about.This is akin to you publishing a piece in the NY Times about how you 'd like to blow up the car of that " annoying someone " and will be looking forward to your visit to the hardware store to pick up some fertilizer later this evening. ( there.. .
car analogy ; we 're finished )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If she'd just said it, there wouldn't be an issue.
Instead, she published it in an international forum, itemizing what type of actions she'd like to take, without being specific about the person she was talking about.This is akin to you publishing a piece in the NY Times about how you'd like to blow up the car of that "annoying someone" and will be looking forward to your visit to the hardware store to pick up some fertilizer later this evening.(there...
car analogy; we're finished)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461978</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30467832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30563108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30466216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462712
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30466452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30473002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30472822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30470552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30467448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30469148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30478756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30467476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30548192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30478650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30466338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_193208_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462712
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463984
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463402
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461834
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30466452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30467476
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461808
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462000
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462028
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462422
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30466338
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30467832
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464594
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463982
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30466216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30472822
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462938
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462740
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30466104
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463186
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461840
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463528
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30548192
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30467448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468376
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30470552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30563108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462590
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30473002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462536
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462860
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463418
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462288
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462648
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30478650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30469148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462348
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30478756
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462402
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462118
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462460
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462612
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30465590
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464386
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462610
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462490
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463992
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30464870
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30461904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462360
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30463660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30468894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_193208.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_193208.30462382
</commentlist>
</conversation>
