<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_16_1611246</id>
	<title>Angry AT&amp;T Customers May Disrupt Service</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1260980340000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>g0dsp33d writes <i>"<a href="http://www.fakesteve.net/">Fake Steve Jobs,</a> the alter-alias of Newsweek's Dan Lyons, is <a href="http://www.fakesteve.net/2009/12/operation-chokehold.html">calling disgruntled AT&amp;T users to protest</a> comments from AT&amp;T&rsquo;s Ralph de la Vega that smart phone (specifically iPhone) usage is responsible for their network issues and his plan to end unlimited data plans. The post, dubbed 'Operation Chokehold,' wants AT&amp;T customers to use as much data service as they can on Friday, December 18th at noon. While Fake Steve Jobs is notable for its satire, many Twitter and Facebook users seem to be rallying to its cry. It is unclear if there will be enough support to cause a DDOS."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>g0dsp33d writes " Fake Steve Jobs , the alter-alias of Newsweek 's Dan Lyons , is calling disgruntled AT&amp;T users to protest comments from AT&amp;T    s Ralph de la Vega that smart phone ( specifically iPhone ) usage is responsible for their network issues and his plan to end unlimited data plans .
The post , dubbed 'Operation Chokehold, ' wants AT&amp;T customers to use as much data service as they can on Friday , December 18th at noon .
While Fake Steve Jobs is notable for its satire , many Twitter and Facebook users seem to be rallying to its cry .
It is unclear if there will be enough support to cause a DDOS .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>g0dsp33d writes "Fake Steve Jobs, the alter-alias of Newsweek's Dan Lyons, is calling disgruntled AT&amp;T users to protest comments from AT&amp;T’s Ralph de la Vega that smart phone (specifically iPhone) usage is responsible for their network issues and his plan to end unlimited data plans.
The post, dubbed 'Operation Chokehold,' wants AT&amp;T customers to use as much data service as they can on Friday, December 18th at noon.
While Fake Steve Jobs is notable for its satire, many Twitter and Facebook users seem to be rallying to its cry.
It is unclear if there will be enough support to cause a DDOS.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460280</id>
	<title>Re:Not the best idea</title>
	<author>DeadCatX2</author>
	<datestamp>1259692740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>AT&amp;T has effectively admitted that the data usage growth for smartphones is above the rate that their data network will be able to grow</i></p><p>Maybe if they stop suing Verizon over commercials and start investing that money in infrastructure, growth won't be a problem.</p><p><i>In addition, what if this actually interferes with an emergency call?</i></p><p>This type of risk analysis should have been addressed during the design state of the network, because it's a very real possibility even outside of an attempt by users to fight back against their corporate rulers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AT&amp;T has effectively admitted that the data usage growth for smartphones is above the rate that their data network will be able to growMaybe if they stop suing Verizon over commercials and start investing that money in infrastructure , growth wo n't be a problem.In addition , what if this actually interferes with an emergency call ? This type of risk analysis should have been addressed during the design state of the network , because it 's a very real possibility even outside of an attempt by users to fight back against their corporate rulers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AT&amp;T has effectively admitted that the data usage growth for smartphones is above the rate that their data network will be able to growMaybe if they stop suing Verizon over commercials and start investing that money in infrastructure, growth won't be a problem.In addition, what if this actually interferes with an emergency call?This type of risk analysis should have been addressed during the design state of the network, because it's a very real possibility even outside of an attempt by users to fight back against their corporate rulers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460496</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>Sylver Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1259693640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>The spectrum is auctioned off the highest bidder. For a few billion dollars the entrenched interests can just gobble it all up regardless of whether or not they need it or intend to deploy on it.</i> <br>
<br>
This has always been one of my biggest complaints about the FCC's wireless spectrum auctions.  There really needs to be a use requirement attached to the sale.  For example, anytime a company/individual purchases a chunk of spectrum, there are required to put it to use.  If they don't utilize it or under-utilize* it it gets taken back from them (no refunds) and then re-auctioned.<br>
<br>
* - Under utilization would cover buying a chunk of spectrum which can carry far more information on it than a company does regularly.  In which case, that chunk should be stripped from them and a less valuable one given for their current use.  This is to avoid the purchase of a valuable chunk and then using it to send control messages or the like to avoid it appearing unused.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The spectrum is auctioned off the highest bidder .
For a few billion dollars the entrenched interests can just gobble it all up regardless of whether or not they need it or intend to deploy on it .
This has always been one of my biggest complaints about the FCC 's wireless spectrum auctions .
There really needs to be a use requirement attached to the sale .
For example , anytime a company/individual purchases a chunk of spectrum , there are required to put it to use .
If they do n't utilize it or under-utilize * it it gets taken back from them ( no refunds ) and then re-auctioned .
* - Under utilization would cover buying a chunk of spectrum which can carry far more information on it than a company does regularly .
In which case , that chunk should be stripped from them and a less valuable one given for their current use .
This is to avoid the purchase of a valuable chunk and then using it to send control messages or the like to avoid it appearing unused .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The spectrum is auctioned off the highest bidder.
For a few billion dollars the entrenched interests can just gobble it all up regardless of whether or not they need it or intend to deploy on it.
This has always been one of my biggest complaints about the FCC's wireless spectrum auctions.
There really needs to be a use requirement attached to the sale.
For example, anytime a company/individual purchases a chunk of spectrum, there are required to put it to use.
If they don't utilize it or under-utilize* it it gets taken back from them (no refunds) and then re-auctioned.
* - Under utilization would cover buying a chunk of spectrum which can carry far more information on it than a company does regularly.
In which case, that chunk should be stripped from them and a less valuable one given for their current use.
This is to avoid the purchase of a valuable chunk and then using it to send control messages or the like to avoid it appearing unused.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30465688</id>
	<title>Re:Legality?</title>
	<author>srhill</author>
	<datestamp>1259667780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure there's some Bush-era-Gestapo-law that the FCC could use to lock up all iPhone users in an undisclosed location.

But seriously, do you think AT&amp;T's going to sue this guy for inciting network usage? Think of all the reporters who have iPhones. They would have a field day with that lawsuit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure there 's some Bush-era-Gestapo-law that the FCC could use to lock up all iPhone users in an undisclosed location .
But seriously , do you think AT&amp;T 's going to sue this guy for inciting network usage ?
Think of all the reporters who have iPhones .
They would have a field day with that lawsuit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure there's some Bush-era-Gestapo-law that the FCC could use to lock up all iPhone users in an undisclosed location.
But seriously, do you think AT&amp;T's going to sue this guy for inciting network usage?
Think of all the reporters who have iPhones.
They would have a field day with that lawsuit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30469296</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>mgblst</author>
	<datestamp>1259690580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is a protest, what do you not understand about this? It is the same when you get people complaining about traffic by driving slow. Or cylists complaining about cars by driving in a huge pack in peak hour.</p><p>How do you suggest the protest, by building extra infrastructure to improve ATT network, so they get better calls? Or maybe not using their phones, so they miss out on business and personal calls? Genius, bloody genius.</p><p>When you protest you have a limited number of things you can do. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT COMPLICATED CONCEPT??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a protest , what do you not understand about this ?
It is the same when you get people complaining about traffic by driving slow .
Or cylists complaining about cars by driving in a huge pack in peak hour.How do you suggest the protest , by building extra infrastructure to improve ATT network , so they get better calls ?
Or maybe not using their phones , so they miss out on business and personal calls ?
Genius , bloody genius.When you protest you have a limited number of things you can do .
DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT COMPLICATED CONCEPT ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a protest, what do you not understand about this?
It is the same when you get people complaining about traffic by driving slow.
Or cylists complaining about cars by driving in a huge pack in peak hour.How do you suggest the protest, by building extra infrastructure to improve ATT network, so they get better calls?
Or maybe not using their phones, so they miss out on business and personal calls?
Genius, bloody genius.When you protest you have a limited number of things you can do.
DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT COMPLICATED CONCEPT?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460562</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259693820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You realize that it's much easier for a tower to cover LESS developed areas, right?  Buildings block cell signals.  Urban areas are the worst-case scenario as far as radio signals go, not the best.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You realize that it 's much easier for a tower to cover LESS developed areas , right ?
Buildings block cell signals .
Urban areas are the worst-case scenario as far as radio signals go , not the best .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You realize that it's much easier for a tower to cover LESS developed areas, right?
Buildings block cell signals.
Urban areas are the worst-case scenario as far as radio signals go, not the best.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30470286</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe it's the phone</title>
	<author>bkk\_diesel</author>
	<datestamp>1261081140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't live in the USA so I have no idea how good or bad AT&amp;T is, but what I do know is that the RF sensitivity of the iPhone isn't very good. I can think of plenty of times (and places) where my iPhone (and not just my iPhone) will disconnect and then can't get a signal again - yet friends on the same network with other phones do just fine.</p><p>Hell there are large periods of time on my morning train commute where the iPhone claims "No Service" yet my Blackberry (on the same network) is downloading emails and browsing the web just fine.</p></div><p>I believe that is a firmware issue that has been resolved.  Might want to update your iPhone.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't live in the USA so I have no idea how good or bad AT&amp;T is , but what I do know is that the RF sensitivity of the iPhone is n't very good .
I can think of plenty of times ( and places ) where my iPhone ( and not just my iPhone ) will disconnect and then ca n't get a signal again - yet friends on the same network with other phones do just fine.Hell there are large periods of time on my morning train commute where the iPhone claims " No Service " yet my Blackberry ( on the same network ) is downloading emails and browsing the web just fine.I believe that is a firmware issue that has been resolved .
Might want to update your iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't live in the USA so I have no idea how good or bad AT&amp;T is, but what I do know is that the RF sensitivity of the iPhone isn't very good.
I can think of plenty of times (and places) where my iPhone (and not just my iPhone) will disconnect and then can't get a signal again - yet friends on the same network with other phones do just fine.Hell there are large periods of time on my morning train commute where the iPhone claims "No Service" yet my Blackberry (on the same network) is downloading emails and browsing the web just fine.I believe that is a firmware issue that has been resolved.
Might want to update your iPhone.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459898</id>
	<title>Maybe it's the phone</title>
	<author>Mr\_Silver</author>
	<datestamp>1259691420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For an alternative point of view, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/business/13digi.html?\_r=1" title="nytimes.com">this article</a> [nytimes.com] is interesting because it claims that the iPhone design isn't very good and that is what is causing the problems.</p><p>I don't live in the USA so I have no idea how good or bad AT&amp;T is, but what I do know is that the RF sensitivity of the iPhone isn't very good. I can think of plenty of times (and places) where my iPhone (and not just my iPhone) will disconnect and then can't get a signal again - yet friends on the same network with other phones do just fine.</p><p>Hell there are large periods of time on my morning train commute where the iPhone claims "No Service" yet my Blackberry (on the same network) is downloading emails and browsing the web just fine.</p><p>It was terrible on the original iPhone and the 3GS is better, but like the camera quality, I do think they need to work at it quite a bit more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For an alternative point of view , this article [ nytimes.com ] is interesting because it claims that the iPhone design is n't very good and that is what is causing the problems.I do n't live in the USA so I have no idea how good or bad AT&amp;T is , but what I do know is that the RF sensitivity of the iPhone is n't very good .
I can think of plenty of times ( and places ) where my iPhone ( and not just my iPhone ) will disconnect and then ca n't get a signal again - yet friends on the same network with other phones do just fine.Hell there are large periods of time on my morning train commute where the iPhone claims " No Service " yet my Blackberry ( on the same network ) is downloading emails and browsing the web just fine.It was terrible on the original iPhone and the 3GS is better , but like the camera quality , I do think they need to work at it quite a bit more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For an alternative point of view, this article [nytimes.com] is interesting because it claims that the iPhone design isn't very good and that is what is causing the problems.I don't live in the USA so I have no idea how good or bad AT&amp;T is, but what I do know is that the RF sensitivity of the iPhone isn't very good.
I can think of plenty of times (and places) where my iPhone (and not just my iPhone) will disconnect and then can't get a signal again - yet friends on the same network with other phones do just fine.Hell there are large periods of time on my morning train commute where the iPhone claims "No Service" yet my Blackberry (on the same network) is downloading emails and browsing the web just fine.It was terrible on the original iPhone and the 3GS is better, but like the camera quality, I do think they need to work at it quite a bit more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459100</id>
	<title>Ping Flood</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259688720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>why don't people figure out what at&amp;t's data network ip range is and have a gigantic ping flood to that entire segment? huge packets to all the ip addys? get some proper skills instead of streaming pron...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why do n't people figure out what at&amp;t 's data network ip range is and have a gigantic ping flood to that entire segment ?
huge packets to all the ip addys ?
get some proper skills instead of streaming pron.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why don't people figure out what at&amp;t's data network ip range is and have a gigantic ping flood to that entire segment?
huge packets to all the ip addys?
get some proper skills instead of streaming pron...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460220</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>sonnejw0</author>
	<datestamp>1259692500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, the retaliation against the AT&amp;T CEO saying that iPhone users use too much data<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... is for iPhone users to use too much data?  How is that going to ensure that the unlimited pricing stays in affect?  There's a clause in the terms of service that allows them to cut you off at any time if they deem you've used too much data... I hope these 14 year olds with iPhones are willing to become martyrs<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... of course, it's the parents that are paying the bill, anyway.  Hell if I've ever known a 14 year old that earned $150 a month.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the retaliation against the AT&amp;T CEO saying that iPhone users use too much data ... is for iPhone users to use too much data ?
How is that going to ensure that the unlimited pricing stays in affect ?
There 's a clause in the terms of service that allows them to cut you off at any time if they deem you 've used too much data... I hope these 14 year olds with iPhones are willing to become martyrs ... of course , it 's the parents that are paying the bill , anyway .
Hell if I 've ever known a 14 year old that earned $ 150 a month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the retaliation against the AT&amp;T CEO saying that iPhone users use too much data ... is for iPhone users to use too much data?
How is that going to ensure that the unlimited pricing stays in affect?
There's a clause in the terms of service that allows them to cut you off at any time if they deem you've used too much data... I hope these 14 year olds with iPhones are willing to become martyrs ... of course, it's the parents that are paying the bill, anyway.
Hell if I've ever known a 14 year old that earned $150 a month.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460424</id>
	<title>Re:Liability for missed 911 call?</title>
	<author>Bengie</author>
	<datestamp>1259693340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use a small midwest carrier called US Cellular and their customer service told me to hold onto any phones that I deactivate because I can still use them to call 911.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use a small midwest carrier called US Cellular and their customer service told me to hold onto any phones that I deactivate because I can still use them to call 911 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use a small midwest carrier called US Cellular and their customer service told me to hold onto any phones that I deactivate because I can still use them to call 911.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461068</id>
	<title>Wasn't unlimited part of the deal with Apple?</title>
	<author>crimoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259695680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps I'm just making things up but didn't Apple demand that the iPhone come with unlimited data?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps I 'm just making things up but did n't Apple demand that the iPhone come with unlimited data ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps I'm just making things up but didn't Apple demand that the iPhone come with unlimited data?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460598</id>
	<title>Idiots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259693940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's no easier way to put it. Anyone planning to DDOS a telecommunications network is an idiot. Why? Because *emergency services* use those networks too. Can you imagine what it'd be like to be at the scene of a horrible accident, trying to call 911 and not being able to because Fake Steve Jobs organized a DDOS?</p><p>Oh wait, there *is* a better word. Fucktards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no easier way to put it .
Anyone planning to DDOS a telecommunications network is an idiot .
Why ? Because * emergency services * use those networks too .
Can you imagine what it 'd be like to be at the scene of a horrible accident , trying to call 911 and not being able to because Fake Steve Jobs organized a DDOS ? Oh wait , there * is * a better word .
Fucktards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no easier way to put it.
Anyone planning to DDOS a telecommunications network is an idiot.
Why? Because *emergency services* use those networks too.
Can you imagine what it'd be like to be at the scene of a horrible accident, trying to call 911 and not being able to because Fake Steve Jobs organized a DDOS?Oh wait, there *is* a better word.
Fucktards.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463028</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>bkr1\_2k</author>
	<datestamp>1259658960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who said it was perfect?  What I read is that Ralph de la Vega is blaming the iPhone for AT&amp;Ts shitty performance when it performs just as shittily using other smart phones and when iPhones used in other locations don't have the same issues.  Nobody said the iPhone was perfect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who said it was perfect ?
What I read is that Ralph de la Vega is blaming the iPhone for AT&amp;Ts shitty performance when it performs just as shittily using other smart phones and when iPhones used in other locations do n't have the same issues .
Nobody said the iPhone was perfect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who said it was perfect?
What I read is that Ralph de la Vega is blaming the iPhone for AT&amp;Ts shitty performance when it performs just as shittily using other smart phones and when iPhones used in other locations don't have the same issues.
Nobody said the iPhone was perfect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459216</id>
	<title>How mature.</title>
	<author>demonlapin</author>
	<datestamp>1259689140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, it's times like this that I'm glad I have Verizon.<br> <br>Seriously, folks, this is like crazy Berkeley behavior. All you're going to do is make sure that every other AT&amp;T customer - like the ones whose family members are sick in the hospital, or who just got in a massive wreck, or who just got carjacked, or maybe are waiting to hear from a family member overseas - can't get service.  All so you can point out that AT&amp;T has a grossly inadequate network, which is something that everyone knows already.  The completely nontechnical people I know at work all complain about AT&amp;T service <em>even when they don't have 3G service at all</em>.  What's your point?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , it 's times like this that I 'm glad I have Verizon .
Seriously , folks , this is like crazy Berkeley behavior .
All you 're going to do is make sure that every other AT&amp;T customer - like the ones whose family members are sick in the hospital , or who just got in a massive wreck , or who just got carjacked , or maybe are waiting to hear from a family member overseas - ca n't get service .
All so you can point out that AT&amp;T has a grossly inadequate network , which is something that everyone knows already .
The completely nontechnical people I know at work all complain about AT&amp;T service even when they do n't have 3G service at all .
What 's your point ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, it's times like this that I'm glad I have Verizon.
Seriously, folks, this is like crazy Berkeley behavior.
All you're going to do is make sure that every other AT&amp;T customer - like the ones whose family members are sick in the hospital, or who just got in a massive wreck, or who just got carjacked, or maybe are waiting to hear from a family member overseas - can't get service.
All so you can point out that AT&amp;T has a grossly inadequate network, which is something that everyone knows already.
The completely nontechnical people I know at work all complain about AT&amp;T service even when they don't have 3G service at all.
What's your point?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460928</id>
	<title>How stupid is this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How stupid is this??  Wouldn't an increase in data usage just confirm the need for AT&amp;T to charge for overage usage? It creates a perfect test scenario for them and they can now predict how much money they will expect to receive when they implement their charges.  If anything, this is doing them a huge favor.</p><p>If you really want to protest AT&amp;T, hit them where it hurts most...$$$.  As soon as they change to the overage payment, everyone needs to switch carriers.  You don't have to worry about paying the termination fee because they changed the Terms and therefore if you disagree, you can cancel your plan without termination fee.  Imagine that, however many thousands of iPhone users all of a sudden cancel their plans and switch to a different carrier.  That will say something.  I hope AT&amp;T does this soon, cuz I don't want to wait til April when my plan expires so I can switch to the HTC Hero.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How stupid is this ? ?
Would n't an increase in data usage just confirm the need for AT&amp;T to charge for overage usage ?
It creates a perfect test scenario for them and they can now predict how much money they will expect to receive when they implement their charges .
If anything , this is doing them a huge favor.If you really want to protest AT&amp;T , hit them where it hurts most... $ $ $ .
As soon as they change to the overage payment , everyone needs to switch carriers .
You do n't have to worry about paying the termination fee because they changed the Terms and therefore if you disagree , you can cancel your plan without termination fee .
Imagine that , however many thousands of iPhone users all of a sudden cancel their plans and switch to a different carrier .
That will say something .
I hope AT&amp;T does this soon , cuz I do n't want to wait til April when my plan expires so I can switch to the HTC Hero .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How stupid is this??
Wouldn't an increase in data usage just confirm the need for AT&amp;T to charge for overage usage?
It creates a perfect test scenario for them and they can now predict how much money they will expect to receive when they implement their charges.
If anything, this is doing them a huge favor.If you really want to protest AT&amp;T, hit them where it hurts most...$$$.
As soon as they change to the overage payment, everyone needs to switch carriers.
You don't have to worry about paying the termination fee because they changed the Terms and therefore if you disagree, you can cancel your plan without termination fee.
Imagine that, however many thousands of iPhone users all of a sudden cancel their plans and switch to a different carrier.
That will say something.
I hope AT&amp;T does this soon, cuz I don't want to wait til April when my plan expires so I can switch to the HTC Hero.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463676</id>
	<title>Re:Not the best idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259661180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like they should stop signing up new customers until they can provide for them. Think there's any chance that will happen?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like they should stop signing up new customers until they can provide for them .
Think there 's any chance that will happen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like they should stop signing up new customers until they can provide for them.
Think there's any chance that will happen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30464224</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259663220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you had only one choice, would you rather have a landline or a cellphone?</p><p>Thought so...</p><p>So people in the US can be happy about their substandard cell service, because their landlines which they don't want are more developed.  Does that</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you had only one choice , would you rather have a landline or a cellphone ? Thought so...So people in the US can be happy about their substandard cell service , because their landlines which they do n't want are more developed .
Does that</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you had only one choice, would you rather have a landline or a cellphone?Thought so...So people in the US can be happy about their substandard cell service, because their landlines which they don't want are more developed.
Does that</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459296</id>
	<title>Hey AT&amp;T  - upgrade your 3G network!</title>
	<author>ekimminau</author>
	<datestamp>1259689440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have had a Motorola KRZR for about 3 years with an "unlimited data plan" I paid an extra $10.00 a month for. I tehthered and constantly connected my company VPN for Lotus Notes email.

When I switched to my iPhone I have to pay $20.00 a month more for "unlimited data" yet I couldn't tether (until I jailbrooke my iPhone).

If AT&amp;T honestly thinks that me switching from my Motorola to my iPhone increased my usage of their network, they are sadly mistaken. If anything I use it less because the tethering isn't as stable and I mark this up to their 3G network, not the phone.

They need to upgrade their 3G network and I fully intend to max out my 3G connection driving around town during lunch on Friday.

P.S. I love the Verizon map commercials. I wish they would double the number of times they show them every day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have had a Motorola KRZR for about 3 years with an " unlimited data plan " I paid an extra $ 10.00 a month for .
I tehthered and constantly connected my company VPN for Lotus Notes email .
When I switched to my iPhone I have to pay $ 20.00 a month more for " unlimited data " yet I could n't tether ( until I jailbrooke my iPhone ) .
If AT&amp;T honestly thinks that me switching from my Motorola to my iPhone increased my usage of their network , they are sadly mistaken .
If anything I use it less because the tethering is n't as stable and I mark this up to their 3G network , not the phone .
They need to upgrade their 3G network and I fully intend to max out my 3G connection driving around town during lunch on Friday .
P.S. I love the Verizon map commercials .
I wish they would double the number of times they show them every day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have had a Motorola KRZR for about 3 years with an "unlimited data plan" I paid an extra $10.00 a month for.
I tehthered and constantly connected my company VPN for Lotus Notes email.
When I switched to my iPhone I have to pay $20.00 a month more for "unlimited data" yet I couldn't tether (until I jailbrooke my iPhone).
If AT&amp;T honestly thinks that me switching from my Motorola to my iPhone increased my usage of their network, they are sadly mistaken.
If anything I use it less because the tethering isn't as stable and I mark this up to their 3G network, not the phone.
They need to upgrade their 3G network and I fully intend to max out my 3G connection driving around town during lunch on Friday.
P.S. I love the Verizon map commercials.
I wish they would double the number of times they show them every day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459984</id>
	<title>Re:Not the best idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259691660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they should do the opposite: pick an hour for NO iPhone usage on another day, and compare the results.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they should do the opposite : pick an hour for NO iPhone usage on another day , and compare the results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they should do the opposite: pick an hour for NO iPhone usage on another day, and compare the results.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460310</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>saider</author>
	<datestamp>1259692920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Using this logic you could sue just about anyone. There are technical limits imposed by the equipment used. You could even sue your router or laptop manufacturer since they limit your ethernet consumption to 100Mbps or 1000Mbps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Using this logic you could sue just about anyone .
There are technical limits imposed by the equipment used .
You could even sue your router or laptop manufacturer since they limit your ethernet consumption to 100Mbps or 1000Mbps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using this logic you could sue just about anyone.
There are technical limits imposed by the equipment used.
You could even sue your router or laptop manufacturer since they limit your ethernet consumption to 100Mbps or 1000Mbps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461078</id>
	<title>Re:Not the best idea</title>
	<author>Blappo</author>
	<datestamp>1259695740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"In addition, what if this actually interferes with an emergency call?"</p><p>Oh no, what if we get DIRTY!</p><p>Seriously, I hate this argument.  It really adds nothing to the conversation and smacks of Republican "what about the children" alarmism.</p><p>You really polluted your point with that, and I really don't mean to flame, but I chafe when people try to use edge cases like you have for no real purpose whatsoever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" In addition , what if this actually interferes with an emergency call ?
" Oh no , what if we get DIRTY ! Seriously , I hate this argument .
It really adds nothing to the conversation and smacks of Republican " what about the children " alarmism.You really polluted your point with that , and I really do n't mean to flame , but I chafe when people try to use edge cases like you have for no real purpose whatsoever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"In addition, what if this actually interferes with an emergency call?
"Oh no, what if we get DIRTY!Seriously, I hate this argument.
It really adds nothing to the conversation and smacks of Republican "what about the children" alarmism.You really polluted your point with that, and I really don't mean to flame, but I chafe when people try to use edge cases like you have for no real purpose whatsoever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461462</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>segin</author>
	<datestamp>1259697060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>or to the Verizon customers who think they don't have any good devices available</p></div></blockquote><p>

Does Verizon's devices have a pad of buttons numbered 0 to 9, and if I push 7 of them, will I hear a voice come out of the speaker? Yes? Well, I just can't see why you say Verizon has no good devices available.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>or to the Verizon customers who think they do n't have any good devices available Does Verizon 's devices have a pad of buttons numbered 0 to 9 , and if I push 7 of them , will I hear a voice come out of the speaker ?
Yes ? Well , I just ca n't see why you say Verizon has no good devices available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or to the Verizon customers who think they don't have any good devices available

Does Verizon's devices have a pad of buttons numbered 0 to 9, and if I push 7 of them, will I hear a voice come out of the speaker?
Yes? Well, I just can't see why you say Verizon has no good devices available.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460166</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>lowrydr310</author>
	<datestamp>1259692380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sprint has the lowest priced rate plans, without a doubt. I've been with them for over 10 years, and every year or so I think about switching just to try something new, and then I compare the prices of their plans and Sprint always wins.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sprint has the lowest priced rate plans , without a doubt .
I 've been with them for over 10 years , and every year or so I think about switching just to try something new , and then I compare the prices of their plans and Sprint always wins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sprint has the lowest priced rate plans, without a doubt.
I've been with them for over 10 years, and every year or so I think about switching just to try something new, and then I compare the prices of their plans and Sprint always wins.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460268</id>
	<title>Re:Not the best idea</title>
	<author>pckl300</author>
	<datestamp>1259692680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In addition, what if this actually interferes with an emergency call?</p></div><p>You might want to look into not having an emergency.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In addition , what if this actually interferes with an emergency call ? You might want to look into not having an emergency .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In addition, what if this actually interferes with an emergency call?You might want to look into not having an emergency.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468864</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259687100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um. Move there. Trade sanitary life for cell phone coverage. Is that the exchange you want to make?.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um .
Move there .
Trade sanitary life for cell phone coverage .
Is that the exchange you want to make ? .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um.
Move there.
Trade sanitary life for cell phone coverage.
Is that the exchange you want to make?.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910</id>
	<title>I read this as</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259688060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Internet braces for even higher levels of smug Apple douchebags"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Internet braces for even higher levels of smug Apple douchebags "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Internet braces for even higher levels of smug Apple douchebags"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460832</id>
	<title>Re:. . .and the issues are?</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1259694720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>First of all, these two statements are completely incompatible</p></div><p>Not necessarily.  Best example: The xbox 360 is an awesome gaming console, but the older versions still had horrendous reliability.  Hence, it did its job as a gaming console well, but that doesn't make it a well designed piece of hardware.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Second, what are the iPhone's glaringly bad issues?</p></div><p>To name a few of the more obvious ones...</p><p>Sync issues (admittedly, this is more due to iTunes being bad software rather than the iPhone being bad hardware, but still...), problems with many new firmware rollouts (for example the random shutdowns and decreased battery life of 3.1), no MMS until just a couple of short months ago, Appstore approval inconsistencies (again, not an issue with the phone itself, but I doubt you could convince anyone the iPhone would be the success it is without the Appstore)...oh, and that little problem with <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/08/01/iphone-3g-hits-melting-point-burns-sleeping-dudes-leg.html" title="intomobile.com">randomly</a> [intomobile.com] <a href="http://iphonefreakz.com/2009/12/06/iphone-melts-at-party/" title="iphonefreakz.com">catching</a> [iphonefreakz.com] <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5327124/flaming-iphone-3g-melts-a-crater-in-this-car-seat" title="gizmodo.com">fire</a> [gizmodo.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First of all , these two statements are completely incompatibleNot necessarily .
Best example : The xbox 360 is an awesome gaming console , but the older versions still had horrendous reliability .
Hence , it did its job as a gaming console well , but that does n't make it a well designed piece of hardware.Second , what are the iPhone 's glaringly bad issues ? To name a few of the more obvious ones...Sync issues ( admittedly , this is more due to iTunes being bad software rather than the iPhone being bad hardware , but still... ) , problems with many new firmware rollouts ( for example the random shutdowns and decreased battery life of 3.1 ) , no MMS until just a couple of short months ago , Appstore approval inconsistencies ( again , not an issue with the phone itself , but I doubt you could convince anyone the iPhone would be the success it is without the Appstore ) ...oh , and that little problem with randomly [ intomobile.com ] catching [ iphonefreakz.com ] fire [ gizmodo.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First of all, these two statements are completely incompatibleNot necessarily.
Best example: The xbox 360 is an awesome gaming console, but the older versions still had horrendous reliability.
Hence, it did its job as a gaming console well, but that doesn't make it a well designed piece of hardware.Second, what are the iPhone's glaringly bad issues?To name a few of the more obvious ones...Sync issues (admittedly, this is more due to iTunes being bad software rather than the iPhone being bad hardware, but still...), problems with many new firmware rollouts (for example the random shutdowns and decreased battery life of 3.1), no MMS until just a couple of short months ago, Appstore approval inconsistencies (again, not an issue with the phone itself, but I doubt you could convince anyone the iPhone would be the success it is without the Appstore)...oh, and that little problem with randomly [intomobile.com] catching [iphonefreakz.com] fire [gizmodo.com].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459466</id>
	<title>Re:Not the best idea</title>
	<author>PKFC</author>
	<datestamp>1259690100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If emergency calls cannot go through under "100\%" usage of the tower, something is seriously wrong. There needs to be bandwidth provisioned and reserved for emergency calls for every tower and trunk.</p><p>If this does affect emergency calls, AT&amp;T really does need to get their shit together. I assume there are laws in place to enforce the transmission of emergency calls. Hell AT&amp;T gets a free stress test of their network which is something they should be doing anyway. Real world data of extreme usage. Study, learn and yes: build a better network because of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If emergency calls can not go through under " 100 \ % " usage of the tower , something is seriously wrong .
There needs to be bandwidth provisioned and reserved for emergency calls for every tower and trunk.If this does affect emergency calls , AT&amp;T really does need to get their shit together .
I assume there are laws in place to enforce the transmission of emergency calls .
Hell AT&amp;T gets a free stress test of their network which is something they should be doing anyway .
Real world data of extreme usage .
Study , learn and yes : build a better network because of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If emergency calls cannot go through under "100\%" usage of the tower, something is seriously wrong.
There needs to be bandwidth provisioned and reserved for emergency calls for every tower and trunk.If this does affect emergency calls, AT&amp;T really does need to get their shit together.
I assume there are laws in place to enforce the transmission of emergency calls.
Hell AT&amp;T gets a free stress test of their network which is something they should be doing anyway.
Real world data of extreme usage.
Study, learn and yes: build a better network because of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459454</id>
	<title>To use as much bandwidth as possible?</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1259690040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, sounds too difficult. Is there an app for it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , sounds too difficult .
Is there an app for it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, sounds too difficult.
Is there an app for it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460106</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>nxtw</author>
	<datestamp>1259692140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Think you or I could start a cell phone plan? Think again. The spectrum is auctioned off the highest bidder. For a few billion dollars the entrenched interests can just gobble it all up regardless of whether or not they need it or intend to deploy on it.</p></div></blockquote><p>US cellular/PCS licenses do have buildout requirements.</p><p>And yes, you can start your own cell phone plan by buying wholesale voice/data usage from an existing carrier.  Think of devices like the Amazon Kindle.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Think you or I could start a cell phone plan ?
Think again .
The spectrum is auctioned off the highest bidder .
For a few billion dollars the entrenched interests can just gobble it all up regardless of whether or not they need it or intend to deploy on it.US cellular/PCS licenses do have buildout requirements.And yes , you can start your own cell phone plan by buying wholesale voice/data usage from an existing carrier .
Think of devices like the Amazon Kindle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think you or I could start a cell phone plan?
Think again.
The spectrum is auctioned off the highest bidder.
For a few billion dollars the entrenched interests can just gobble it all up regardless of whether or not they need it or intend to deploy on it.US cellular/PCS licenses do have buildout requirements.And yes, you can start your own cell phone plan by buying wholesale voice/data usage from an existing carrier.
Think of devices like the Amazon Kindle.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944</id>
	<title>Should be</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259688180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This thing isn't only for iPhone users. It's for every user of the AT&amp;T network with a 3G device. And if AT&amp;T had trouble with casual usage, wait until a lot of users try to bring the network down.</p><p>Can't wait to hear how the whole thing went for both sides of this story.</p><p>At least you guys have a choice of providers. Here in Canada, we almost have government-backed monopolies with even higher monthly bills.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This thing is n't only for iPhone users .
It 's for every user of the AT&amp;T network with a 3G device .
And if AT&amp;T had trouble with casual usage , wait until a lot of users try to bring the network down.Ca n't wait to hear how the whole thing went for both sides of this story.At least you guys have a choice of providers .
Here in Canada , we almost have government-backed monopolies with even higher monthly bills .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This thing isn't only for iPhone users.
It's for every user of the AT&amp;T network with a 3G device.
And if AT&amp;T had trouble with casual usage, wait until a lot of users try to bring the network down.Can't wait to hear how the whole thing went for both sides of this story.At least you guys have a choice of providers.
Here in Canada, we almost have government-backed monopolies with even higher monthly bills.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1259689980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um no,  I use the unlimited data plan to afford it.  it's $15.00 a month on my Nokia 5800 I use it for 90\% email and 10\% other.  If they drop the unlimited plan then they will lose me as a customer.</p><p>The douchebags are the AT&amp;T executives.   I'm tired of them trying like hell to screw the customer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um no , I use the unlimited data plan to afford it .
it 's $ 15.00 a month on my Nokia 5800 I use it for 90 \ % email and 10 \ % other .
If they drop the unlimited plan then they will lose me as a customer.The douchebags are the AT&amp;T executives .
I 'm tired of them trying like hell to screw the customer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um no,  I use the unlimited data plan to afford it.
it's $15.00 a month on my Nokia 5800 I use it for 90\% email and 10\% other.
If they drop the unlimited plan then they will lose me as a customer.The douchebags are the AT&amp;T executives.
I'm tired of them trying like hell to screw the customer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460000</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>Low Ranked Craig</author>
	<datestamp>1259691720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please detail these issues.  I've been using one since 2007, and the ONLY issue I have is the lack of multitasking, which is a big issue, but really, that's it, and on the original iPhone, multitasking would have been painful based on the start up time for apps and the slowness with which some of the mexecute.</p><p>Most of the "issues" are missing features that apparently, most people don't care about.  Like me.  Here's a list of a few things that I, and apparently a lot of people, don't really care about:</p><ul>
<li>more megapixels on a phone camera</li><li>a flash on a phone camera</li><li>MMS when you have e-mail</li><li>copy and paste.  I've used it one time and i won't have a need for it until the next time someone e-mails me the password for a wireless network</li></ul><p>I'm not suggesting that the phone shouldn't have had these features, and others, from day one, but when people say the iPhone has "glaringly bad" issues, that is generally from their narrow, technophile's perspective.  I like the minimalism and simplicity of the iPhone.  That and the fact it plays Doom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please detail these issues .
I 've been using one since 2007 , and the ONLY issue I have is the lack of multitasking , which is a big issue , but really , that 's it , and on the original iPhone , multitasking would have been painful based on the start up time for apps and the slowness with which some of the mexecute.Most of the " issues " are missing features that apparently , most people do n't care about .
Like me .
Here 's a list of a few things that I , and apparently a lot of people , do n't really care about : more megapixels on a phone cameraa flash on a phone cameraMMS when you have e-mailcopy and paste .
I 've used it one time and i wo n't have a need for it until the next time someone e-mails me the password for a wireless networkI 'm not suggesting that the phone should n't have had these features , and others , from day one , but when people say the iPhone has " glaringly bad " issues , that is generally from their narrow , technophile 's perspective .
I like the minimalism and simplicity of the iPhone .
That and the fact it plays Doom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please detail these issues.
I've been using one since 2007, and the ONLY issue I have is the lack of multitasking, which is a big issue, but really, that's it, and on the original iPhone, multitasking would have been painful based on the start up time for apps and the slowness with which some of the mexecute.Most of the "issues" are missing features that apparently, most people don't care about.
Like me.
Here's a list of a few things that I, and apparently a lot of people, don't really care about:
more megapixels on a phone cameraa flash on a phone cameraMMS when you have e-mailcopy and paste.
I've used it one time and i won't have a need for it until the next time someone e-mails me the password for a wireless networkI'm not suggesting that the phone shouldn't have had these features, and others, from day one, but when people say the iPhone has "glaringly bad" issues, that is generally from their narrow, technophile's perspective.
I like the minimalism and simplicity of the iPhone.
That and the fact it plays Doom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459710</id>
	<title>I just want to make sure I understand.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259690880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are protesting AT&amp;T's announcement that smartphones are disrupting its network.  By using smartphones.  To disrupt AT&amp;T's network?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are protesting AT&amp;T 's announcement that smartphones are disrupting its network .
By using smartphones .
To disrupt AT&amp;T 's network ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are protesting AT&amp;T's announcement that smartphones are disrupting its network.
By using smartphones.
To disrupt AT&amp;T's network?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460718</id>
	<title>What idiot uses the word unlimited anyway</title>
	<author>bugs2squash</author>
	<datestamp>1259694360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eventually data use was going to grow to consume whatever network is implemented. What they really meant was that they did not want to be held accountable for imposing limits, that is they did not want to be answering questions like "I've run out of limit, how did that happen ?"</p><p>

It was laziness on their part and now its coming back to bite them. I'm also prepared to believe (just on blind prejudice) that the iPhone is set up to wantonly consume as much bandwidth as it can get, both by making poor use of spectrum with a radio designed more with an eye to battery life than to RF performance and by having an app-store full of applications that consume great gobs of bandwidth for little benefit.</p><p>
I have some sympathy for AT&amp;T - why should everyone pay to build out a network to serve a small minority of people with things that they should not expect to get wirelessly, or should be able to get without using so much spectrum. But the problem here, in my opinion, is that they used the word unlimited out of sheer marketing bravado and laziness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eventually data use was going to grow to consume whatever network is implemented .
What they really meant was that they did not want to be held accountable for imposing limits , that is they did not want to be answering questions like " I 've run out of limit , how did that happen ?
" It was laziness on their part and now its coming back to bite them .
I 'm also prepared to believe ( just on blind prejudice ) that the iPhone is set up to wantonly consume as much bandwidth as it can get , both by making poor use of spectrum with a radio designed more with an eye to battery life than to RF performance and by having an app-store full of applications that consume great gobs of bandwidth for little benefit .
I have some sympathy for AT&amp;T - why should everyone pay to build out a network to serve a small minority of people with things that they should not expect to get wirelessly , or should be able to get without using so much spectrum .
But the problem here , in my opinion , is that they used the word unlimited out of sheer marketing bravado and laziness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eventually data use was going to grow to consume whatever network is implemented.
What they really meant was that they did not want to be held accountable for imposing limits, that is they did not want to be answering questions like "I've run out of limit, how did that happen ?
"

It was laziness on their part and now its coming back to bite them.
I'm also prepared to believe (just on blind prejudice) that the iPhone is set up to wantonly consume as much bandwidth as it can get, both by making poor use of spectrum with a radio designed more with an eye to battery life than to RF performance and by having an app-store full of applications that consume great gobs of bandwidth for little benefit.
I have some sympathy for AT&amp;T - why should everyone pay to build out a network to serve a small minority of people with things that they should not expect to get wirelessly, or should be able to get without using so much spectrum.
But the problem here, in my opinion, is that they used the word unlimited out of sheer marketing bravado and laziness.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460116</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Option</title>
	<author>castironpigeon</author>
	<datestamp>1259692200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>First - no, you won't.<br>Second - even if you did, why should the FCC care? No, really, think about it. Do you think any government agency is going to purposely put thousands of people out of jobs, cause stocks to drop even lower, and send a great big Fuck You to the corporate bosses who pay their paychecks all to make a couple thousand disgruntled geeks happy? When those disgruntled geeks are just going to go away if they're ignored for a while?<br> <br>I feel your pain. I don't have a smart phone, but broadband is in the same boat. Just bend over and take it like a good consumer whore. The only people who can change this system are the people running it and I don't think they have any intention of changing it in our favor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>First - no , you wo n't.Second - even if you did , why should the FCC care ?
No , really , think about it .
Do you think any government agency is going to purposely put thousands of people out of jobs , cause stocks to drop even lower , and send a great big Fuck You to the corporate bosses who pay their paychecks all to make a couple thousand disgruntled geeks happy ?
When those disgruntled geeks are just going to go away if they 're ignored for a while ?
I feel your pain .
I do n't have a smart phone , but broadband is in the same boat .
Just bend over and take it like a good consumer whore .
The only people who can change this system are the people running it and I do n't think they have any intention of changing it in our favor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First - no, you won't.Second - even if you did, why should the FCC care?
No, really, think about it.
Do you think any government agency is going to purposely put thousands of people out of jobs, cause stocks to drop even lower, and send a great big Fuck You to the corporate bosses who pay their paychecks all to make a couple thousand disgruntled geeks happy?
When those disgruntled geeks are just going to go away if they're ignored for a while?
I feel your pain.
I don't have a smart phone, but broadband is in the same boat.
Just bend over and take it like a good consumer whore.
The only people who can change this system are the people running it and I don't think they have any intention of changing it in our favor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459540</id>
	<title>DDOS, served!</title>
	<author>Caradoc</author>
	<datestamp>1259690340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot has done to Fake Steve Jobs what Fake Steve Jobs was trying to do to AT&amp;T.</p><p>Awesome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot has done to Fake Steve Jobs what Fake Steve Jobs was trying to do to AT&amp;T.Awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot has done to Fake Steve Jobs what Fake Steve Jobs was trying to do to AT&amp;T.Awesome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459076</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259688600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I can go ahead and expect to stop receiving e-mails on my BlackBerry on Friday?  Great, yeah, sweet.  Thanks guys!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I can go ahead and expect to stop receiving e-mails on my BlackBerry on Friday ?
Great , yeah , sweet .
Thanks guys !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I can go ahead and expect to stop receiving e-mails on my BlackBerry on Friday?
Great, yeah, sweet.
Thanks guys!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459748</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1259691000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I went out to Sikkim for the first week, closer in geography to Colorado than NYC (or the rest of India). I don't think I ever lost cell reception once. We're talking about an area that is about as densely populated as farm towns in the Midwest. I was standing on top of a mountain and could get 4 networks. 4. Vodaphone, Airtel, Aircel and some other local one. I got better reception at the top of the mountain that I can get at my own house in a subdivision (I don't live in the sticks).</p></div><p>Have you ever stopped to think that it was the fact that you were at the top of a mountain in an uncrowded area that made reception so great?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I went out to Sikkim for the first week , closer in geography to Colorado than NYC ( or the rest of India ) .
I do n't think I ever lost cell reception once .
We 're talking about an area that is about as densely populated as farm towns in the Midwest .
I was standing on top of a mountain and could get 4 networks .
4. Vodaphone , Airtel , Aircel and some other local one .
I got better reception at the top of the mountain that I can get at my own house in a subdivision ( I do n't live in the sticks ) .Have you ever stopped to think that it was the fact that you were at the top of a mountain in an uncrowded area that made reception so great ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I went out to Sikkim for the first week, closer in geography to Colorado than NYC (or the rest of India).
I don't think I ever lost cell reception once.
We're talking about an area that is about as densely populated as farm towns in the Midwest.
I was standing on top of a mountain and could get 4 networks.
4. Vodaphone, Airtel, Aircel and some other local one.
I got better reception at the top of the mountain that I can get at my own house in a subdivision (I don't live in the sticks).Have you ever stopped to think that it was the fact that you were at the top of a mountain in an uncrowded area that made reception so great?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461390</id>
	<title>Re:Bait and swtich?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259696760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>never mind the fact that they are guilty of treason...how u may ask...check the electronic frontier foundation website.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>never mind the fact that they are guilty of treason...how u may ask...check the electronic frontier foundation website .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>never mind the fact that they are guilty of treason...how u may ask...check the electronic frontier foundation website.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461854</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hell, its not even like they are "willing to sell the hardware that consumes the services" they went out of their way to get contracts with Apple to create a freaking monopoly so that you can only use an iphone on their service! In addition to which, the only thing they offer is the unlimited plan and as iphone user you have to buy that... So they really set themselves up for this problem and know they want to complain about it!?! I really don't understand what they were/are thinking...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hell , its not even like they are " willing to sell the hardware that consumes the services " they went out of their way to get contracts with Apple to create a freaking monopoly so that you can only use an iphone on their service !
In addition to which , the only thing they offer is the unlimited plan and as iphone user you have to buy that... So they really set themselves up for this problem and know they want to complain about it ! ? !
I really do n't understand what they were/are thinking.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hell, its not even like they are "willing to sell the hardware that consumes the services" they went out of their way to get contracts with Apple to create a freaking monopoly so that you can only use an iphone on their service!
In addition to which, the only thing they offer is the unlimited plan and as iphone user you have to buy that... So they really set themselves up for this problem and know they want to complain about it!?!
I really don't understand what they were/are thinking...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459394</id>
	<title>DDoS......</title>
	<author>Shakrai</author>
	<datestamp>1259689740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.... there's an app for that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.... there 's an app for that ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.... there's an app for that ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460958</id>
	<title>Another zombie network!!</title>
	<author>Maniacal</author>
	<datestamp>1259695260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>many <strong>Twitter and Facebook users</strong> seem to be rallying to its cry. It is unclear if there will be enough support to cause a DDOS</em></p><p>Gives new meaning to the "utilize a network of zombies for a DDOS attack" thing I'm always hearing about<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>many Twitter and Facebook users seem to be rallying to its cry .
It is unclear if there will be enough support to cause a DDOSGives new meaning to the " utilize a network of zombies for a DDOS attack " thing I 'm always hearing about ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>many Twitter and Facebook users seem to be rallying to its cry.
It is unclear if there will be enough support to cause a DDOSGives new meaning to the "utilize a network of zombies for a DDOS attack" thing I'm always hearing about ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460464</id>
	<title>500 Internal Server Error</title>
	<author>skivvies</author>
	<datestamp>1259693460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fake Steve Jobs should have gotten the 'Unlimited Plan' from his hosting provider.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fake Steve Jobs should have gotten the 'Unlimited Plan ' from his hosting provider .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fake Steve Jobs should have gotten the 'Unlimited Plan' from his hosting provider.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459758</id>
	<title>Domestic squabble...</title>
	<author>dbcad7</author>
	<datestamp>1259691060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is something seriously wrong with all these anti AT&amp;T people.. It's like people who stay in a bad relationship where the cops are at their door every so often, yet continue to stay together.. If you don't get along, find another partner.. Your bitching, doesn't make me think your smarter or that your partner is a bad person, it only makes me think that you like to bitch.. If i had such a relationship with a company that bothered me so much, I think I'd find another company.. For gods sake stop embarrassing yourself with screaming matches in the grocery store.. Separate, and maybe you'll both become better people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is something seriously wrong with all these anti AT&amp;T people.. It 's like people who stay in a bad relationship where the cops are at their door every so often , yet continue to stay together.. If you do n't get along , find another partner.. Your bitching , does n't make me think your smarter or that your partner is a bad person , it only makes me think that you like to bitch.. If i had such a relationship with a company that bothered me so much , I think I 'd find another company.. For gods sake stop embarrassing yourself with screaming matches in the grocery store.. Separate , and maybe you 'll both become better people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is something seriously wrong with all these anti AT&amp;T people.. It's like people who stay in a bad relationship where the cops are at their door every so often, yet continue to stay together.. If you don't get along, find another partner.. Your bitching, doesn't make me think your smarter or that your partner is a bad person, it only makes me think that you like to bitch.. If i had such a relationship with a company that bothered me so much, I think I'd find another company.. For gods sake stop embarrassing yourself with screaming matches in the grocery store.. Separate, and maybe you'll both become better people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459666</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>ElectricTurtle</author>
	<datestamp>1259690760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If doing nothing will produce a negative outcome, and doing something will produce the same negative outcome, then why not do SOMETHING especially if it could at least shake some people out of AT&amp;T's grasp through dissatisfaction?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If doing nothing will produce a negative outcome , and doing something will produce the same negative outcome , then why not do SOMETHING especially if it could at least shake some people out of AT&amp;T 's grasp through dissatisfaction ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If doing nothing will produce a negative outcome, and doing something will produce the same negative outcome, then why not do SOMETHING especially if it could at least shake some people out of AT&amp;T's grasp through dissatisfaction?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30549152</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261676160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot 3: legal proceedings against anyone using the data plan at that time, regardless of their intentions.  They can probably have it classed as terrorism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot 3 : legal proceedings against anyone using the data plan at that time , regardless of their intentions .
They can probably have it classed as terrorism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot 3: legal proceedings against anyone using the data plan at that time, regardless of their intentions.
They can probably have it classed as terrorism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30469796</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259694660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>kbps? kBps? there's no Kbps..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>kbps ?
kBps ? there 's no Kbps. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>kbps?
kBps? there's no Kbps..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30477026</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>NelsChristian</author>
	<datestamp>1261080120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I was standing on top of a mountain </i> <p>
Standing on a high point tends to give you a clear path to cell towers quite some distance away.   Flat land, like North Dakota gives great reception 30 miles from a cell tower as there are no obstructions.   And even if it's populated like farm towns in the Midwest, and everybody has a phone - well most farmers spend most time working, not yakking and there aren't enough folks in a 30 mile circle to need that many cell towers.
</p><p>
And labor in Sikkim is probably cheaper than  labor in the USA, so building that cell tower was cheaper.
</p><p>
You are right that the business model of locked-in phones is a pain, but your examples of better service are apples &amp; oranges if you are comparing the sparse farmers of Sikkim to the densely packed IPhone users of Silcon Valley.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was standing on top of a mountain Standing on a high point tends to give you a clear path to cell towers quite some distance away .
Flat land , like North Dakota gives great reception 30 miles from a cell tower as there are no obstructions .
And even if it 's populated like farm towns in the Midwest , and everybody has a phone - well most farmers spend most time working , not yakking and there are n't enough folks in a 30 mile circle to need that many cell towers .
And labor in Sikkim is probably cheaper than labor in the USA , so building that cell tower was cheaper .
You are right that the business model of locked-in phones is a pain , but your examples of better service are apples &amp; oranges if you are comparing the sparse farmers of Sikkim to the densely packed IPhone users of Silcon Valley .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was standing on top of a mountain  
Standing on a high point tends to give you a clear path to cell towers quite some distance away.
Flat land, like North Dakota gives great reception 30 miles from a cell tower as there are no obstructions.
And even if it's populated like farm towns in the Midwest, and everybody has a phone - well most farmers spend most time working, not yakking and there aren't enough folks in a 30 mile circle to need that many cell towers.
And labor in Sikkim is probably cheaper than  labor in the USA, so building that cell tower was cheaper.
You are right that the business model of locked-in phones is a pain, but your examples of better service are apples &amp; oranges if you are comparing the sparse farmers of Sikkim to the densely packed IPhone users of Silcon Valley.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463158</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259659380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder why nobody has brought up the idea that maybe part of the drop is because all your data is transmitted through At&amp;t then through apples servers.  Nobody here seriously believes Apple doesn't get a copy of ever text right?</p><p>This is not conspiracy theory, I couldn't care less, Google knows more about me than Apple, its just I was working with a company on secure encrypted texting and the iphone was out because Apple maintains visual of everything across the iphones and their network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder why nobody has brought up the idea that maybe part of the drop is because all your data is transmitted through At&amp;t then through apples servers .
Nobody here seriously believes Apple does n't get a copy of ever text right ? This is not conspiracy theory , I could n't care less , Google knows more about me than Apple , its just I was working with a company on secure encrypted texting and the iphone was out because Apple maintains visual of everything across the iphones and their network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder why nobody has brought up the idea that maybe part of the drop is because all your data is transmitted through At&amp;t then through apples servers.
Nobody here seriously believes Apple doesn't get a copy of ever text right?This is not conspiracy theory, I couldn't care less, Google knows more about me than Apple, its just I was working with a company on secure encrypted texting and the iphone was out because Apple maintains visual of everything across the iphones and their network.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462238</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>brainiac ghost1991</author>
	<datestamp>1259699820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>erm, you do realise that calls to the emergency services have priority over all other traffic, a 999/911/112 call is guaranteed to go through, even if it kicks other users off the network. Also, emergency calls are able to use other service providers networks. If there is congestion and an emergency call is made, the tower will drop a call/data packets to allow them through.</htmltext>
<tokenext>erm , you do realise that calls to the emergency services have priority over all other traffic , a 999/911/112 call is guaranteed to go through , even if it kicks other users off the network .
Also , emergency calls are able to use other service providers networks .
If there is congestion and an emergency call is made , the tower will drop a call/data packets to allow them through .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>erm, you do realise that calls to the emergency services have priority over all other traffic, a 999/911/112 call is guaranteed to go through, even if it kicks other users off the network.
Also, emergency calls are able to use other service providers networks.
If there is congestion and an emergency call is made, the tower will drop a call/data packets to allow them through.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459254</id>
	<title>Fastest way to solve it?</title>
	<author>MikeRT</author>
	<datestamp>1259689260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Disconnect those users. The iPhone zealots have nowhere else to go. Telling them to go for the Droid is like telling a crack addict to drop their habit by smoking pot and slurping vodka. Take down a few thousand users, and the majority will quickly stop complaining.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Disconnect those users .
The iPhone zealots have nowhere else to go .
Telling them to go for the Droid is like telling a crack addict to drop their habit by smoking pot and slurping vodka .
Take down a few thousand users , and the majority will quickly stop complaining .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disconnect those users.
The iPhone zealots have nowhere else to go.
Telling them to go for the Droid is like telling a crack addict to drop their habit by smoking pot and slurping vodka.
Take down a few thousand users, and the majority will quickly stop complaining.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459804</id>
	<title>Re:Bait and swtich?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259691180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I do believe that in the U.S., you have a fixed number of days to cancel your contract upon any change of terms of the original contract. So if you did not get out then, or failed to read the original terms sufficiently, then you really cannot blame them, as you had the option to leave upon the modification of terms, or just not sign up in the first place, if the problem was with the original terms, that you most likely didn't read.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do believe that in the U.S. , you have a fixed number of days to cancel your contract upon any change of terms of the original contract .
So if you did not get out then , or failed to read the original terms sufficiently , then you really can not blame them , as you had the option to leave upon the modification of terms , or just not sign up in the first place , if the problem was with the original terms , that you most likely did n't read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do believe that in the U.S., you have a fixed number of days to cancel your contract upon any change of terms of the original contract.
So if you did not get out then, or failed to read the original terms sufficiently, then you really cannot blame them, as you had the option to leave upon the modification of terms, or just not sign up in the first place, if the problem was with the original terms, that you most likely didn't read.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468514</id>
	<title>Re:Angry Slashdotters May Disrupt Service</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259684160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The irony!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The irony !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The irony!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459776</id>
	<title>cause a DDOS</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1259691120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this when advocacy rubs up against the law? Y'know, like, I'm all for it an' stuff, but it will work almost as well as a Disney or Sony boycott.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this when advocacy rubs up against the law ?
Y'know , like , I 'm all for it an ' stuff , but it will work almost as well as a Disney or Sony boycott .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this when advocacy rubs up against the law?
Y'know, like, I'm all for it an' stuff, but it will work almost as well as a Disney or Sony boycott.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024</id>
	<title>Not the best idea</title>
	<author>ezberry</author>
	<datestamp>1259688480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How could anyone really think this is a good idea? AT&amp;T has effectively admitted that the data usage growth for smartphones is above the rate that their data network will be able to grow. Using more data intensive applications will only show them how correct they are ("Look how much data will be used in the future when more people are streaming data")</p><p>In addition, what if this actually interferes with an emergency call?</p><p>Sorry that this might not be anti-corporate enough, but Operation Chokehold really isn't a great idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How could anyone really think this is a good idea ?
AT&amp;T has effectively admitted that the data usage growth for smartphones is above the rate that their data network will be able to grow .
Using more data intensive applications will only show them how correct they are ( " Look how much data will be used in the future when more people are streaming data " ) In addition , what if this actually interferes with an emergency call ? Sorry that this might not be anti-corporate enough , but Operation Chokehold really is n't a great idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How could anyone really think this is a good idea?
AT&amp;T has effectively admitted that the data usage growth for smartphones is above the rate that their data network will be able to grow.
Using more data intensive applications will only show them how correct they are ("Look how much data will be used in the future when more people are streaming data")In addition, what if this actually interferes with an emergency call?Sorry that this might not be anti-corporate enough, but Operation Chokehold really isn't a great idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468278</id>
	<title>Re:Legality?</title>
	<author>Magnus Pym</author>
	<datestamp>1259682120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The baseband chipset used in the iPhone is from a second tier vendor. Apple went with them instead of using a chip from one of the major players like Qualcomm or Ericcson Mobile because they wanted someone they could control. That is why the iPhone's reception is poor.</p><p>So the iPhone is the equivalent of a Rolls Royce with a Yugo engine inside.</p><p>Magnus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The baseband chipset used in the iPhone is from a second tier vendor .
Apple went with them instead of using a chip from one of the major players like Qualcomm or Ericcson Mobile because they wanted someone they could control .
That is why the iPhone 's reception is poor.So the iPhone is the equivalent of a Rolls Royce with a Yugo engine inside.Magnus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The baseband chipset used in the iPhone is from a second tier vendor.
Apple went with them instead of using a chip from one of the major players like Qualcomm or Ericcson Mobile because they wanted someone they could control.
That is why the iPhone's reception is poor.So the iPhone is the equivalent of a Rolls Royce with a Yugo engine inside.Magnus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459422</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1259689920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Here in Canada, we almost have government-backed monopolies with even higher monthly bills.</p></div><p>In Soviet Canada, YOU supply PROVIDERS!</p><p>(I wish I was joking... grumble mumble Telus grumble)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here in Canada , we almost have government-backed monopolies with even higher monthly bills.In Soviet Canada , YOU supply PROVIDERS !
( I wish I was joking... grumble mumble Telus grumble )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here in Canada, we almost have government-backed monopolies with even higher monthly bills.In Soviet Canada, YOU supply PROVIDERS!
(I wish I was joking... grumble mumble Telus grumble)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461294</id>
	<title>Re:Not the best idea</title>
	<author>mikewren420</author>
	<datestamp>1259696400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not my problem that AT&amp;T is selling smartphones at a rate which their infrastructure cannot support.  They're compounding their problems by offering an unlimited data plan, taboot.</p><p>Encouraging users to actually use the service for which they are already paying isn't a bad thing.  If this interferes with E911 calls, AT&amp;T has a lot of explaining to do.</p><p>However, FakeSteve isn't doing anyone favors by calling it a DDoS.  Is it a DDoS if everyone picks up their landline at midnight on New Years Day?  Is it a DDoS when everyone goes to the post office in the week leading up to Christmas?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not my problem that AT&amp;T is selling smartphones at a rate which their infrastructure can not support .
They 're compounding their problems by offering an unlimited data plan , taboot.Encouraging users to actually use the service for which they are already paying is n't a bad thing .
If this interferes with E911 calls , AT&amp;T has a lot of explaining to do.However , FakeSteve is n't doing anyone favors by calling it a DDoS .
Is it a DDoS if everyone picks up their landline at midnight on New Years Day ?
Is it a DDoS when everyone goes to the post office in the week leading up to Christmas ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not my problem that AT&amp;T is selling smartphones at a rate which their infrastructure cannot support.
They're compounding their problems by offering an unlimited data plan, taboot.Encouraging users to actually use the service for which they are already paying isn't a bad thing.
If this interferes with E911 calls, AT&amp;T has a lot of explaining to do.However, FakeSteve isn't doing anyone favors by calling it a DDoS.
Is it a DDoS if everyone picks up their landline at midnight on New Years Day?
Is it a DDoS when everyone goes to the post office in the week leading up to Christmas?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259689380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great.  If this guy goes and speaks truth to power with a "digital flash mob", I can picture two outcomes.  One:  AT&amp;T's digital network is brought to its knees, normal customers who are not part of the flash mob are pissed off, and AT&amp;T issues a press release saying that unlimited data plans are <i>obviously</i> having a negative impact on the network and will therefore be terminated.  Two:  AT&amp;T's network sees little or no disruption, and therefore they realize they have nothing to fear from angry customers.  Unlimited data plans are terminated anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great .
If this guy goes and speaks truth to power with a " digital flash mob " , I can picture two outcomes .
One : AT&amp;T 's digital network is brought to its knees , normal customers who are not part of the flash mob are pissed off , and AT&amp;T issues a press release saying that unlimited data plans are obviously having a negative impact on the network and will therefore be terminated .
Two : AT&amp;T 's network sees little or no disruption , and therefore they realize they have nothing to fear from angry customers .
Unlimited data plans are terminated anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great.
If this guy goes and speaks truth to power with a "digital flash mob", I can picture two outcomes.
One:  AT&amp;T's digital network is brought to its knees, normal customers who are not part of the flash mob are pissed off, and AT&amp;T issues a press release saying that unlimited data plans are obviously having a negative impact on the network and will therefore be terminated.
Two:  AT&amp;T's network sees little or no disruption, and therefore they realize they have nothing to fear from angry customers.
Unlimited data plans are terminated anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466516</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1259671080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've gone my entire life on ATT/Cingular and I think I've had one dropped call... ever. Maybe two.</p><p>What are you guys doing to get dropped calls? Or is it extremely location-specific? I've never understood this complaint.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've gone my entire life on ATT/Cingular and I think I 've had one dropped call... ever. Maybe two.What are you guys doing to get dropped calls ?
Or is it extremely location-specific ?
I 've never understood this complaint .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've gone my entire life on ATT/Cingular and I think I've had one dropped call... ever. Maybe two.What are you guys doing to get dropped calls?
Or is it extremely location-specific?
I've never understood this complaint.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459306</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>SatanicPuppy</author>
	<datestamp>1259689440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree, and yet I don't. Unlimited means <em>unlimited</em>, it doesn't mean "Within reason."</p><p>AT&amp;T needs to get it's shit together.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , and yet I do n't .
Unlimited means unlimited , it does n't mean " Within reason .
" AT&amp;T needs to get it 's shit together .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, and yet I don't.
Unlimited means unlimited, it doesn't mean "Within reason.
"AT&amp;T needs to get it's shit together.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30470226</id>
	<title>Pinhead Idiots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261080720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These pinheads don't realize honest people who want nothing to do with this "Operation Chokehold" count on AT&amp;T's network to conduct business, stay in touch with loved ones, and communicate with public safety institutions.  And they would pat to watch their conduits crippled because some "big mean ol' corporation" hurt your feelings?  They're no better than Al-Qaeda.</p><p>Think before you speak!</p><p>If you agree "Operation Chokehold" is brain-dead, search for and join "Operation Cuckoo" on Facebook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These pinheads do n't realize honest people who want nothing to do with this " Operation Chokehold " count on AT&amp;T 's network to conduct business , stay in touch with loved ones , and communicate with public safety institutions .
And they would pat to watch their conduits crippled because some " big mean ol ' corporation " hurt your feelings ?
They 're no better than Al-Qaeda.Think before you speak ! If you agree " Operation Chokehold " is brain-dead , search for and join " Operation Cuckoo " on Facebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These pinheads don't realize honest people who want nothing to do with this "Operation Chokehold" count on AT&amp;T's network to conduct business, stay in touch with loved ones, and communicate with public safety institutions.
And they would pat to watch their conduits crippled because some "big mean ol' corporation" hurt your feelings?
They're no better than Al-Qaeda.Think before you speak!If you agree "Operation Chokehold" is brain-dead, search for and join "Operation Cuckoo" on Facebook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459522</id>
	<title>Re:Not the best idea</title>
	<author>chew8bitsperbyte</author>
	<datestamp>1259690280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In addition, what if this actually interferes with an emergency call?</p></div><p>Data and voice operate independently of one another.  While 3G/EDGE service may be disrupted it won't affect end-users' abilities to make calls over GPRS.

And while it may further reinforce AT&amp;T's point that their end-users gobble "too much" bandwidth, the publicity that it could generate would be a nice way of sticking it to yet another corporation that enjoys selling "limited-unlimited".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In addition , what if this actually interferes with an emergency call ? Data and voice operate independently of one another .
While 3G/EDGE service may be disrupted it wo n't affect end-users ' abilities to make calls over GPRS .
And while it may further reinforce AT&amp;T 's point that their end-users gobble " too much " bandwidth , the publicity that it could generate would be a nice way of sticking it to yet another corporation that enjoys selling " limited-unlimited " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In addition, what if this actually interferes with an emergency call?Data and voice operate independently of one another.
While 3G/EDGE service may be disrupted it won't affect end-users' abilities to make calls over GPRS.
And while it may further reinforce AT&amp;T's point that their end-users gobble "too much" bandwidth, the publicity that it could generate would be a nice way of sticking it to yet another corporation that enjoys selling "limited-unlimited".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459880</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>XorNand</author>
	<datestamp>1259691420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Out of curiosity, how's the quality of the landlines in India?  In the US, practically every household has access to a landline, regardless of how far out in the backwoods they live or how poor they are.  US telecoms networks have built/maintained a physical network (with five nines of up-time!) across a huge geographic span for about 100 years.</p><p>I'm not saying that telcoms haven't squandered their profits to some extent.  And it makes me sick to think about how they've abused their subsidies on the backs of the taxpayers.  But anyone who's ever had to modernize a corporate LAN/WAN, or refactor an app written in a dead language knows how much, much easier it is to move quicker and cheaper if you don't already have a legacy platform to worry about.  I can't imagine how much inertia a hundred year-old system has.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Out of curiosity , how 's the quality of the landlines in India ?
In the US , practically every household has access to a landline , regardless of how far out in the backwoods they live or how poor they are .
US telecoms networks have built/maintained a physical network ( with five nines of up-time !
) across a huge geographic span for about 100 years.I 'm not saying that telcoms have n't squandered their profits to some extent .
And it makes me sick to think about how they 've abused their subsidies on the backs of the taxpayers .
But anyone who 's ever had to modernize a corporate LAN/WAN , or refactor an app written in a dead language knows how much , much easier it is to move quicker and cheaper if you do n't already have a legacy platform to worry about .
I ca n't imagine how much inertia a hundred year-old system has .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Out of curiosity, how's the quality of the landlines in India?
In the US, practically every household has access to a landline, regardless of how far out in the backwoods they live or how poor they are.
US telecoms networks have built/maintained a physical network (with five nines of up-time!
) across a huge geographic span for about 100 years.I'm not saying that telcoms haven't squandered their profits to some extent.
And it makes me sick to think about how they've abused their subsidies on the backs of the taxpayers.
But anyone who's ever had to modernize a corporate LAN/WAN, or refactor an app written in a dead language knows how much, much easier it is to move quicker and cheaper if you don't already have a legacy platform to worry about.
I can't imagine how much inertia a hundred year-old system has.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461386</id>
	<title>Don't let facts get in the way...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259696760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just hope they don't let facts interfere with their puerile snitmob.<br>"This year, Root Wireless [unaffiliated with any mobile carrier] ran 4.7 million tests on smartphones for each of the four major carriers, spread across seven metropolitan areas: Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles/Orange County, New York, Seattle/Tacoma, the San Francisco Bay Area,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and Washington. In every market, AT&amp;T had faster average download speeds and had signal strength of 75 percent or better more frequently than did Verizon."<br>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/business/13digi.html?\_r=1&amp;em</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just hope they do n't let facts interfere with their puerile snitmob .
" This year , Root Wireless [ unaffiliated with any mobile carrier ] ran 4.7 million tests on smartphones for each of the four major carriers , spread across seven metropolitan areas : Chicago , Dallas , Los Angeles/Orange County , New York , Seattle/Tacoma , the San Francisco Bay Area , ... and Washington .
In every market , AT&amp;T had faster average download speeds and had signal strength of 75 percent or better more frequently than did Verizon .
" http : //www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/business/13digi.html ? \ _r = 1&amp;em</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just hope they don't let facts interfere with their puerile snitmob.
"This year, Root Wireless [unaffiliated with any mobile carrier] ran 4.7 million tests on smartphones for each of the four major carriers, spread across seven metropolitan areas: Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles/Orange County, New York, Seattle/Tacoma, the San Francisco Bay Area, ... and Washington.
In every market, AT&amp;T had faster average download speeds and had signal strength of 75 percent or better more frequently than did Verizon.
"http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/business/13digi.html?\_r=1&amp;em</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460526</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259693700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I agree, and yet I don't. Unlimited means <em>unlimited</em>, it doesn't mean "Within reason."</p><p>AT&amp;T needs to get it's shit together.</p></div><p>AT&amp;T has "It's shit!" together just fine.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , and yet I do n't .
Unlimited means unlimited , it does n't mean " Within reason .
" AT&amp;T needs to get it 's shit together.AT&amp;T has " It 's shit !
" together just fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, and yet I don't.
Unlimited means unlimited, it doesn't mean "Within reason.
"AT&amp;T needs to get it's shit together.AT&amp;T has "It's shit!
" together just fine.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460512</id>
	<title>Don't worry, AT&amp;T has dealt with this before</title>
	<author>NevarMore</author>
	<datestamp>1259693640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AT&amp;T knows how to bullshit and cover when their network has a massive failure and they were doing it decades before everyone else.</p><p><a href="http://jsn13.blogspot.com/2008/07/amazon-s3-july-2008-and-bell-systems.html" title="blogspot.com">http://jsn13.blogspot.com/2008/07/amazon-s3-july-2008-and-bell-systems.html</a> [blogspot.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AT&amp;T knows how to bullshit and cover when their network has a massive failure and they were doing it decades before everyone else.http : //jsn13.blogspot.com/2008/07/amazon-s3-july-2008-and-bell-systems.html [ blogspot.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AT&amp;T knows how to bullshit and cover when their network has a massive failure and they were doing it decades before everyone else.http://jsn13.blogspot.com/2008/07/amazon-s3-july-2008-and-bell-systems.html [blogspot.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459316</id>
	<title>Re:iPhone idiots</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1259689500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, the iPhone idiots accomplished something impossible:  make AT&amp;T look sane.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , the iPhone idiots accomplished something impossible : make AT&amp;T look sane .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, the iPhone idiots accomplished something impossible:  make AT&amp;T look sane.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466078</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>dAzED1</author>
	<datestamp>1259669100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>That's because in terms of landlines, India is light years behind the US.</i></p><p>Fail.  Fail fail fail fail holy blood hell fail.  Landlines?  <i>Landlines?</i>  Not to steal from the guy above, but "saying that the US has great landline service is like bragging that we have the best typewriter availability around so it's acceptable that we can't get good computers."</p><p>Many people I know - in fact, close to half my circle of peers and friends - don't even have a landline anymore.  What year do you think this is?  I don't care if India has bad landlines.</p><p>Wait, scratch that...their cell service is good because their landlines are bad?  So if our landlines get wrecked our cell service will magically get 20x cheaper?  Is that supposed to somehow make sense?</p><p>We invented the farking landlines, cellphones, AND the internet.  You'd think that somewhere along the lines in all that, we could figure out how the hell to have decent service.  And ya wanna know why we don't?  Because we're not really a capitalist society - we've allowed government-protected oligarchies in every major industry.  How the hell much do you think they pay for textbooks in India, for example?  Were I a libertarian, I'd beg for socialism around here - it would be closer to a free market than what we have now, at least.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's because in terms of landlines , India is light years behind the US.Fail .
Fail fail fail fail holy blood hell fail .
Landlines ? Landlines ?
Not to steal from the guy above , but " saying that the US has great landline service is like bragging that we have the best typewriter availability around so it 's acceptable that we ca n't get good computers .
" Many people I know - in fact , close to half my circle of peers and friends - do n't even have a landline anymore .
What year do you think this is ?
I do n't care if India has bad landlines.Wait , scratch that...their cell service is good because their landlines are bad ?
So if our landlines get wrecked our cell service will magically get 20x cheaper ?
Is that supposed to somehow make sense ? We invented the farking landlines , cellphones , AND the internet .
You 'd think that somewhere along the lines in all that , we could figure out how the hell to have decent service .
And ya wan na know why we do n't ?
Because we 're not really a capitalist society - we 've allowed government-protected oligarchies in every major industry .
How the hell much do you think they pay for textbooks in India , for example ?
Were I a libertarian , I 'd beg for socialism around here - it would be closer to a free market than what we have now , at least .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's because in terms of landlines, India is light years behind the US.Fail.
Fail fail fail fail holy blood hell fail.
Landlines?  Landlines?
Not to steal from the guy above, but "saying that the US has great landline service is like bragging that we have the best typewriter availability around so it's acceptable that we can't get good computers.
"Many people I know - in fact, close to half my circle of peers and friends - don't even have a landline anymore.
What year do you think this is?
I don't care if India has bad landlines.Wait, scratch that...their cell service is good because their landlines are bad?
So if our landlines get wrecked our cell service will magically get 20x cheaper?
Is that supposed to somehow make sense?We invented the farking landlines, cellphones, AND the internet.
You'd think that somewhere along the lines in all that, we could figure out how the hell to have decent service.
And ya wanna know why we don't?
Because we're not really a capitalist society - we've allowed government-protected oligarchies in every major industry.
How the hell much do you think they pay for textbooks in India, for example?
Were I a libertarian, I'd beg for socialism around here - it would be closer to a free market than what we have now, at least.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30465886</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>Cyberllama</author>
	<datestamp>1259668500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Moreover, it's not as if iphone users aren't paying more for unlimmited data already anyways.  Now AT&amp;T thinks we might pay more to get less? AT&amp;T only thinks they can away with this shit because, when it comes to 3g data on the iphone, they have a monopoly.  I can't get it from anywhere else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Moreover , it 's not as if iphone users are n't paying more for unlimmited data already anyways .
Now AT&amp;T thinks we might pay more to get less ?
AT&amp;T only thinks they can away with this shit because , when it comes to 3g data on the iphone , they have a monopoly .
I ca n't get it from anywhere else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Moreover, it's not as if iphone users aren't paying more for unlimmited data already anyways.
Now AT&amp;T thinks we might pay more to get less?
AT&amp;T only thinks they can away with this shit because, when it comes to 3g data on the iphone, they have a monopoly.
I can't get it from anywhere else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466262</id>
	<title>It's not just towers, it's also backhaul.</title>
	<author>digsbo</author>
	<datestamp>1259669940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was troubleshooting problems with in-network (copper connected) equipment we sold ATT a few years ago (2005-ish).  They repeatedly tried to blame us for the intermittent service issues, and we were pretty sure we narrowed it down to some kind of transport problem (i.e. their T-carrier backhaul from the towers).
</p><p>
After incredible resistance, we finally convinced them we'd admit it was our fault if they ran a specific line test (basically sending a lot of zeroes to test they were properly provisioned for data and not just voice) and it came back clean.  They ran the test, and while it was silent on the other side of the conference call (we couldn't see the test results as it ran), we noticed everything started mysteriously turning green (all our intermittent drop-outs stopped).  They made up some story about us changing configuration on their network (impossible) while we KNEW they were re-provisioning their copper to transmit data, as we'd suspected they should have done weeks before.  They claimed that publicly so they could avoid taking responsibility for the network outages, which would have impacted their management performance numbers.
</p><p>What I learned was that ATT has a culture of blaming everyone else and not fixing the problem.  This is not a new thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was troubleshooting problems with in-network ( copper connected ) equipment we sold ATT a few years ago ( 2005-ish ) .
They repeatedly tried to blame us for the intermittent service issues , and we were pretty sure we narrowed it down to some kind of transport problem ( i.e .
their T-carrier backhaul from the towers ) .
After incredible resistance , we finally convinced them we 'd admit it was our fault if they ran a specific line test ( basically sending a lot of zeroes to test they were properly provisioned for data and not just voice ) and it came back clean .
They ran the test , and while it was silent on the other side of the conference call ( we could n't see the test results as it ran ) , we noticed everything started mysteriously turning green ( all our intermittent drop-outs stopped ) .
They made up some story about us changing configuration on their network ( impossible ) while we KNEW they were re-provisioning their copper to transmit data , as we 'd suspected they should have done weeks before .
They claimed that publicly so they could avoid taking responsibility for the network outages , which would have impacted their management performance numbers .
What I learned was that ATT has a culture of blaming everyone else and not fixing the problem .
This is not a new thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was troubleshooting problems with in-network (copper connected) equipment we sold ATT a few years ago (2005-ish).
They repeatedly tried to blame us for the intermittent service issues, and we were pretty sure we narrowed it down to some kind of transport problem (i.e.
their T-carrier backhaul from the towers).
After incredible resistance, we finally convinced them we'd admit it was our fault if they ran a specific line test (basically sending a lot of zeroes to test they were properly provisioned for data and not just voice) and it came back clean.
They ran the test, and while it was silent on the other side of the conference call (we couldn't see the test results as it ran), we noticed everything started mysteriously turning green (all our intermittent drop-outs stopped).
They made up some story about us changing configuration on their network (impossible) while we KNEW they were re-provisioning their copper to transmit data, as we'd suspected they should have done weeks before.
They claimed that publicly so they could avoid taking responsibility for the network outages, which would have impacted their management performance numbers.
What I learned was that ATT has a culture of blaming everyone else and not fixing the problem.
This is not a new thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459848</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>AceCoolie</author>
	<datestamp>1259691300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if they change the plan to remove the unlimited data, does this count as "terms &amp; conditions" change and allow users to cancel service without paying the early termination fees?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if they change the plan to remove the unlimited data , does this count as " terms &amp; conditions " change and allow users to cancel service without paying the early termination fees ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if they change the plan to remove the unlimited data, does this count as "terms &amp; conditions" change and allow users to cancel service without paying the early termination fees?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30464504</id>
	<title>Re:Question.</title>
	<author>chicknfood</author>
	<datestamp>1259664240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe the guy mentions in the first few minutes of video that he has to be under a 100 MB file size limit... Might not do as much damage</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe the guy mentions in the first few minutes of video that he has to be under a 100 MB file size limit... Might not do as much damage</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe the guy mentions in the first few minutes of video that he has to be under a 100 MB file size limit... Might not do as much damage</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459680</id>
	<title>Re:Hey AT&amp;T - upgrade your 3G network!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259690820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They need to upgrade their 3G network and I fully intend to max out my 3G connection <strong>driving around</strong> town during lunch on Friday.</p></div><p>Yes, great idea. Make sure you keep your eyes <em>completely</em> off the road at all times. In fact, try to steer with your knees so both hands can be holding the phone.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They need to upgrade their 3G network and I fully intend to max out my 3G connection driving around town during lunch on Friday.Yes , great idea .
Make sure you keep your eyes completely off the road at all times .
In fact , try to steer with your knees so both hands can be holding the phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They need to upgrade their 3G network and I fully intend to max out my 3G connection driving around town during lunch on Friday.Yes, great idea.
Make sure you keep your eyes completely off the road at all times.
In fact, try to steer with your knees so both hands can be holding the phone.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459610</id>
	<title>A novel idea for ATT</title>
	<author>santiagodraco</author>
	<datestamp>1259690580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've got an idea for you ATT to resolve your "network problems"... upgrade the fucking thing.    You've had a POS network for years, it's no wonder it's struggling.</p><p>Nothing has bothered me more since I moved to an iPhone than the fact I had to move off Verizon and onto ATT's network.   Why Apple chose to work with ATT is beyond me, it's been the single biggest flaw in the solution since it's inception.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got an idea for you ATT to resolve your " network problems " ... upgrade the fucking thing .
You 've had a POS network for years , it 's no wonder it 's struggling.Nothing has bothered me more since I moved to an iPhone than the fact I had to move off Verizon and onto ATT 's network .
Why Apple chose to work with ATT is beyond me , it 's been the single biggest flaw in the solution since it 's inception .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got an idea for you ATT to resolve your "network problems"... upgrade the fucking thing.
You've had a POS network for years, it's no wonder it's struggling.Nothing has bothered me more since I moved to an iPhone than the fact I had to move off Verizon and onto ATT's network.
Why Apple chose to work with ATT is beyond me, it's been the single biggest flaw in the solution since it's inception.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459556</id>
	<title>Re:Not the best idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259690400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, the AT&amp;T network is far ahead of any others, it turns out.  The real problem is with the network handling layers in the iPhone.  Some independent research was recently done - using laptops with 3G cards - and it was seen that the AT&amp;T network is the best in the US.
<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/business/13digi.html?\_r=1&amp;em" title="nytimes.com" rel="nofollow">Here is the article if you are in a state of disbelief, like me.</a> [nytimes.com]
<br> <br>
The important consequence of this is that this "Operation Chokehold" is going to do little to the network, since AT&amp;T's network capacity is NOT near its limit with "normal" usage. The iPhones are effectively throttling their own data usage by (faulty) design.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the AT&amp;T network is far ahead of any others , it turns out .
The real problem is with the network handling layers in the iPhone .
Some independent research was recently done - using laptops with 3G cards - and it was seen that the AT&amp;T network is the best in the US .
Here is the article if you are in a state of disbelief , like me .
[ nytimes.com ] The important consequence of this is that this " Operation Chokehold " is going to do little to the network , since AT&amp;T 's network capacity is NOT near its limit with " normal " usage .
The iPhones are effectively throttling their own data usage by ( faulty ) design .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the AT&amp;T network is far ahead of any others, it turns out.
The real problem is with the network handling layers in the iPhone.
Some independent research was recently done - using laptops with 3G cards - and it was seen that the AT&amp;T network is the best in the US.
Here is the article if you are in a state of disbelief, like me.
[nytimes.com]
 
The important consequence of this is that this "Operation Chokehold" is going to do little to the network, since AT&amp;T's network capacity is NOT near its limit with "normal" usage.
The iPhones are effectively throttling their own data usage by (faulty) design.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460014</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>pckl300</author>
	<datestamp>1259691780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The spectrum is auctioned, but the companies bids aren't made public to the other bidders. This attempts to ensure that fair market value is payed for the channels.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The spectrum is auctioned , but the companies bids are n't made public to the other bidders .
This attempts to ensure that fair market value is payed for the channels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The spectrum is auctioned, but the companies bids aren't made public to the other bidders.
This attempts to ensure that fair market value is payed for the channels.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460340</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>ckaminski</author>
	<datestamp>1259692980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the storm didn't have that clicky screen, and maybe had a real keyboard, ala the Palm Pre, I think it would have been a much more commanding hit than it was.  It was sold as the iPhone killer for Verizon, but it failed to achieve much of it's goals.  Most of the Storm early adopters I know were long-time Blackberry fans, and they HATED it.<br><br>An okay offering?  I don't know if you remember smartphones around 2006, but messaging and browsing was absolutely horrid - the best probably being the WinMo smartphones, but even those were arguably horrible.  The iPhone redefined ease-of-use mobile internet, just as the Pre has redefined connecting to people (whether the Pre has any staying power depends on Verizon getting some very soon, IMHO).</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the storm did n't have that clicky screen , and maybe had a real keyboard , ala the Palm Pre , I think it would have been a much more commanding hit than it was .
It was sold as the iPhone killer for Verizon , but it failed to achieve much of it 's goals .
Most of the Storm early adopters I know were long-time Blackberry fans , and they HATED it.An okay offering ?
I do n't know if you remember smartphones around 2006 , but messaging and browsing was absolutely horrid - the best probably being the WinMo smartphones , but even those were arguably horrible .
The iPhone redefined ease-of-use mobile internet , just as the Pre has redefined connecting to people ( whether the Pre has any staying power depends on Verizon getting some very soon , IMHO ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the storm didn't have that clicky screen, and maybe had a real keyboard, ala the Palm Pre, I think it would have been a much more commanding hit than it was.
It was sold as the iPhone killer for Verizon, but it failed to achieve much of it's goals.
Most of the Storm early adopters I know were long-time Blackberry fans, and they HATED it.An okay offering?
I don't know if you remember smartphones around 2006, but messaging and browsing was absolutely horrid - the best probably being the WinMo smartphones, but even those were arguably horrible.
The iPhone redefined ease-of-use mobile internet, just as the Pre has redefined connecting to people (whether the Pre has any staying power depends on Verizon getting some very soon, IMHO).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236</id>
	<title>Bait and swtich?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259689260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Selling us all unlimited *contracts* that they know they cant deliver, then later switching it to limited while we are still stuck with the contract should be something the FCC should look into.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Selling us all unlimited * contracts * that they know they cant deliver , then later switching it to limited while we are still stuck with the contract should be something the FCC should look into .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Selling us all unlimited *contracts* that they know they cant deliver, then later switching it to limited while we are still stuck with the contract should be something the FCC should look into.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459360</id>
	<title>Hah!  Like I'd be able to tell the difference.</title>
	<author>jtownatpunk.net</author>
	<datestamp>1259689680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That sounds like AT&amp;T 3G service on ANY Friday afternoon around here.  As well as Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday.  That's why I'm no longer an AT&amp;T customer.  Every weekday, I'd see data speeds start to fall off around mid-morning.  By 10-10:30, 3G data service was virtually unusable and stayed like that for the rest of the day.  I couldn't even keep a telnet session open reliably.  (And, yes, I was paying damn good money for tethering using a non-iphone 3G smartphone.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That sounds like AT&amp;T 3G service on ANY Friday afternoon around here .
As well as Monday , Tuesday , Wednesday , and Thursday .
That 's why I 'm no longer an AT&amp;T customer .
Every weekday , I 'd see data speeds start to fall off around mid-morning .
By 10-10 : 30 , 3G data service was virtually unusable and stayed like that for the rest of the day .
I could n't even keep a telnet session open reliably .
( And , yes , I was paying damn good money for tethering using a non-iphone 3G smartphone .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That sounds like AT&amp;T 3G service on ANY Friday afternoon around here.
As well as Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday.
That's why I'm no longer an AT&amp;T customer.
Every weekday, I'd see data speeds start to fall off around mid-morning.
By 10-10:30, 3G data service was virtually unusable and stayed like that for the rest of the day.
I couldn't even keep a telnet session open reliably.
(And, yes, I was paying damn good money for tethering using a non-iphone 3G smartphone.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468034</id>
	<title>It's like the kid that's whiny for no reason...</title>
	<author>weston</author>
	<datestamp>1259680140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... to whom you say "Cut it out, or I'll give you something to whine about."</p><p>It's probably true that it's often better to be more articulate than to retaliate with a time-out or a spanking, but anyone who's dealt with an petulant child or telecom executive knows that it's tempting not to be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... to whom you say " Cut it out , or I 'll give you something to whine about .
" It 's probably true that it 's often better to be more articulate than to retaliate with a time-out or a spanking , but anyone who 's dealt with an petulant child or telecom executive knows that it 's tempting not to be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... to whom you say "Cut it out, or I'll give you something to whine about.
"It's probably true that it's often better to be more articulate than to retaliate with a time-out or a spanking, but anyone who's dealt with an petulant child or telecom executive knows that it's tempting not to be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468182</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259681280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>aww that's cute how you feel bound by a completely one sided contract that they reserve the right to change at will.<br>You are a tool.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>aww that 's cute how you feel bound by a completely one sided contract that they reserve the right to change at will.You are a tool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>aww that's cute how you feel bound by a completely one sided contract that they reserve the right to change at will.You are a tool.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460024</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>Coren22</author>
	<datestamp>1259691780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love my Verizon Storm.  Maybe people should stop thinking the iPhone is god and realize that they were quite late to the game with an ok offering.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love my Verizon Storm .
Maybe people should stop thinking the iPhone is god and realize that they were quite late to the game with an ok offering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love my Verizon Storm.
Maybe people should stop thinking the iPhone is god and realize that they were quite late to the game with an ok offering.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459384</id>
	<title>Why does everyone hate to pay for what they use?</title>
	<author>patrickthbold</author>
	<datestamp>1259689680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As long as the price for byte was fair I would have no problem not having an unlimited plan.  Based on the above post, maybe charging $10-$20 per GB downloaded might be fair.  Everyone seems to want unlimited access, but the only people who benefit from that are a) the people who use a lot of bandwidth, and b) ATT who gets lots of money from low usage users.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as the price for byte was fair I would have no problem not having an unlimited plan .
Based on the above post , maybe charging $ 10- $ 20 per GB downloaded might be fair .
Everyone seems to want unlimited access , but the only people who benefit from that are a ) the people who use a lot of bandwidth , and b ) ATT who gets lots of money from low usage users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as the price for byte was fair I would have no problem not having an unlimited plan.
Based on the above post, maybe charging $10-$20 per GB downloaded might be fair.
Everyone seems to want unlimited access, but the only people who benefit from that are a) the people who use a lot of bandwidth, and b) ATT who gets lots of money from low usage users.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30479746</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe it's the phone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261046700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's pretty clear that article is a paid shill piece. <a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html" title="paulgraham.com" rel="nofollow">This essay by Paul Graham</a> [paulgraham.com] explains how things like come to be. Given AT&amp;T's deep pockets, I'm frankly surprised there haven't been more articles like that one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's pretty clear that article is a paid shill piece .
This essay by Paul Graham [ paulgraham.com ] explains how things like come to be .
Given AT&amp;T 's deep pockets , I 'm frankly surprised there have n't been more articles like that one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's pretty clear that article is a paid shill piece.
This essay by Paul Graham [paulgraham.com] explains how things like come to be.
Given AT&amp;T's deep pockets, I'm frankly surprised there haven't been more articles like that one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460770</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>BuckaBooBob</author>
	<datestamp>1259694540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is something seriously wrong with the contracts your signing if you need to wait untill your contract is up to switch carriers.. If you are paying for a service they cannot provide you should not be bound by the contract.. If they also change the terms (Eg get rid on unlimited data) that should also void the contract you signed and you should be able to switch providers without termination fees. There are laws that are put in place to prevent companies to abuse contacts in manners like this... Or are Carriers exempt in the US from these types of laws?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is something seriously wrong with the contracts your signing if you need to wait untill your contract is up to switch carriers.. If you are paying for a service they can not provide you should not be bound by the contract.. If they also change the terms ( Eg get rid on unlimited data ) that should also void the contract you signed and you should be able to switch providers without termination fees .
There are laws that are put in place to prevent companies to abuse contacts in manners like this... Or are Carriers exempt in the US from these types of laws ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is something seriously wrong with the contracts your signing if you need to wait untill your contract is up to switch carriers.. If you are paying for a service they cannot provide you should not be bound by the contract.. If they also change the terms (Eg get rid on unlimited data) that should also void the contract you signed and you should be able to switch providers without termination fees.
There are laws that are put in place to prevent companies to abuse contacts in manners like this... Or are Carriers exempt in the US from these types of laws?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463068</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>CharlyFoxtrot</author>
	<datestamp>1259659080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm wondering whether the exclusivity contract between AT&amp;T and Apple has a "get out clause" in case AT&amp;T is unable to provide sufficient service. Apple must be getting tired of this anchor around their neck by now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm wondering whether the exclusivity contract between AT&amp;T and Apple has a " get out clause " in case AT&amp;T is unable to provide sufficient service .
Apple must be getting tired of this anchor around their neck by now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm wondering whether the exclusivity contract between AT&amp;T and Apple has a "get out clause" in case AT&amp;T is unable to provide sufficient service.
Apple must be getting tired of this anchor around their neck by now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462356</id>
	<title>So this proves.......?</title>
	<author>BanjoMinnow</author>
	<datestamp>1259700060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> All typo's aside, I'm just wondering what this "organization" hopes to prove. Wouldn't this just give Ralph de la Vega more fuel for his fire? Doesn't your plan jusr serve to prove his point? I use AT&amp;T as my primary phone service and I really don't appreciate an organized plan to possibly disrupt MY service because of a select number of people who are angry about paying for services rendered. If you really want to protest switch to another carrier.
  I don't think this plan was thought through very well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All typo 's aside , I 'm just wondering what this " organization " hopes to prove .
Would n't this just give Ralph de la Vega more fuel for his fire ?
Does n't your plan jusr serve to prove his point ?
I use AT&amp;T as my primary phone service and I really do n't appreciate an organized plan to possibly disrupt MY service because of a select number of people who are angry about paying for services rendered .
If you really want to protest switch to another carrier .
I do n't think this plan was thought through very well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> All typo's aside, I'm just wondering what this "organization" hopes to prove.
Wouldn't this just give Ralph de la Vega more fuel for his fire?
Doesn't your plan jusr serve to prove his point?
I use AT&amp;T as my primary phone service and I really don't appreciate an organized plan to possibly disrupt MY service because of a select number of people who are angry about paying for services rendered.
If you really want to protest switch to another carrier.
I don't think this plan was thought through very well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460272</id>
	<title>Tracfone</title>
	<author>IANAAC</author>
	<datestamp>1259692740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>
Everything was prepaid and the SIM cards 'never' expired (They had an expiration sometime in 2025). Meaning I could add $1-2 and it would never expire. Compare that to the US where if I want to get the cheap $10 prepaid plan I have 30 days to use that before it expires.</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>
Tracfone offers what you describe in the US.  I used one all summer/fall in a fairly remote area of northern Wisconsin because my ATT Blackberry got no coverage there - the remaining minutes and number are good for another two years without having to purchase any more minutes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everything was prepaid and the SIM cards 'never ' expired ( They had an expiration sometime in 2025 ) .
Meaning I could add $ 1-2 and it would never expire .
Compare that to the US where if I want to get the cheap $ 10 prepaid plan I have 30 days to use that before it expires .
Tracfone offers what you describe in the US .
I used one all summer/fall in a fairly remote area of northern Wisconsin because my ATT Blackberry got no coverage there - the remaining minutes and number are good for another two years without having to purchase any more minutes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> 
Everything was prepaid and the SIM cards 'never' expired (They had an expiration sometime in 2025).
Meaning I could add $1-2 and it would never expire.
Compare that to the US where if I want to get the cheap $10 prepaid plan I have 30 days to use that before it expires.
Tracfone offers what you describe in the US.
I used one all summer/fall in a fairly remote area of northern Wisconsin because my ATT Blackberry got no coverage there - the remaining minutes and number are good for another two years without having to purchase any more minutes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461128</id>
	<title>Unlimited Data</title>
	<author>mikewren420</author>
	<datestamp>1259695860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After reading AT&amp;T CEO Ralph de la Vega's opinion of users who actually use their unlimited data plan, I decided I wasn't using enough of my unlimited data plan.  I streamed online radio via my work's Internet, which seemed silly.  I'm paying $30/month for unlimited data to a newly purchased unjailbroken iPhone 3GS, using software I purchased through the app store.</p><p>I now stream Radio Paradise's 192kbps stream all day, every day, to my JBL iPhone dock.</p><p>This will not end well for AT&amp;T if they decide to charge me for additional data on top of my current contract "unlimited" data plan.  If they change the terms of my contract, I fully expect to be able to terminate my contract with no ETF, and keep my shiny new iPhone subsidized by AT&amp;T's poor business strategies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After reading AT&amp;T CEO Ralph de la Vega 's opinion of users who actually use their unlimited data plan , I decided I was n't using enough of my unlimited data plan .
I streamed online radio via my work 's Internet , which seemed silly .
I 'm paying $ 30/month for unlimited data to a newly purchased unjailbroken iPhone 3GS , using software I purchased through the app store.I now stream Radio Paradise 's 192kbps stream all day , every day , to my JBL iPhone dock.This will not end well for AT&amp;T if they decide to charge me for additional data on top of my current contract " unlimited " data plan .
If they change the terms of my contract , I fully expect to be able to terminate my contract with no ETF , and keep my shiny new iPhone subsidized by AT&amp;T 's poor business strategies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After reading AT&amp;T CEO Ralph de la Vega's opinion of users who actually use their unlimited data plan, I decided I wasn't using enough of my unlimited data plan.
I streamed online radio via my work's Internet, which seemed silly.
I'm paying $30/month for unlimited data to a newly purchased unjailbroken iPhone 3GS, using software I purchased through the app store.I now stream Radio Paradise's 192kbps stream all day, every day, to my JBL iPhone dock.This will not end well for AT&amp;T if they decide to charge me for additional data on top of my current contract "unlimited" data plan.
If they change the terms of my contract, I fully expect to be able to terminate my contract with no ETF, and keep my shiny new iPhone subsidized by AT&amp;T's poor business strategies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459390</id>
	<title>Charges?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259689740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's the difference between this, and running a botnet?</p><p>Apple phans are no different from infected windows boxes, intellectually.</p><p>If this works, I doubt I'd want to be in this guys shoes.  I don't know what kind of damages at&amp;t would claim for an hours worth of lost services (huge).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the difference between this , and running a botnet ? Apple phans are no different from infected windows boxes , intellectually.If this works , I doubt I 'd want to be in this guys shoes .
I do n't know what kind of damages at&amp;t would claim for an hours worth of lost services ( huge ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the difference between this, and running a botnet?Apple phans are no different from infected windows boxes, intellectually.If this works, I doubt I'd want to be in this guys shoes.
I don't know what kind of damages at&amp;t would claim for an hours worth of lost services (huge).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30464010</id>
	<title>Bingo.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259662500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As anyone who has attended Dragon*Con, knows, AT&amp;T \_always\_ gets saturated when a Firefly/Trek/etc panel lets out. Meanwhile, the Sprint and Verizon peeps manage to continue texting and talking during the mini-DOS. The AT&amp;T saturations aren't as frequent and lengthy as they used to be, not because of network improvements, but because so many people use text messages rather than voice calls nowadays. Don't expect much improvement of network density from AT&amp;T when they can't even fix a recurring problem that is *literally* visible from their southeast headquarters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As anyone who has attended Dragon * Con , knows , AT&amp;T \ _always \ _ gets saturated when a Firefly/Trek/etc panel lets out .
Meanwhile , the Sprint and Verizon peeps manage to continue texting and talking during the mini-DOS .
The AT&amp;T saturations are n't as frequent and lengthy as they used to be , not because of network improvements , but because so many people use text messages rather than voice calls nowadays .
Do n't expect much improvement of network density from AT&amp;T when they ca n't even fix a recurring problem that is * literally * visible from their southeast headquarters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As anyone who has attended Dragon*Con, knows, AT&amp;T \_always\_ gets saturated when a Firefly/Trek/etc panel lets out.
Meanwhile, the Sprint and Verizon peeps manage to continue texting and talking during the mini-DOS.
The AT&amp;T saturations aren't as frequent and lengthy as they used to be, not because of network improvements, but because so many people use text messages rather than voice calls nowadays.
Don't expect much improvement of network density from AT&amp;T when they can't even fix a recurring problem that is *literally* visible from their southeast headquarters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460954</id>
	<title>Re:Hey AT&amp;T - upgrade your 3G network!</title>
	<author>Grizzley9</author>
	<datestamp>1259695200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If anything I use it less because the tethering isn't as stable and I mark this up to their 3G network, not the phone.</p></div><p>Hmm, using the same network connection with a different phone gets you worse performance and you deduce this is b/c of the network which hasn't changed? <br> <br>

Yeah the extra $20 for the data for a specific type of phone is no fun, but that is what the market will accept given the enormous popularity of the phone.  As a GS owner, I hope the competition and the coming non-exclusivity of the iPhone will help push this down as well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If anything I use it less because the tethering is n't as stable and I mark this up to their 3G network , not the phone.Hmm , using the same network connection with a different phone gets you worse performance and you deduce this is b/c of the network which has n't changed ?
Yeah the extra $ 20 for the data for a specific type of phone is no fun , but that is what the market will accept given the enormous popularity of the phone .
As a GS owner , I hope the competition and the coming non-exclusivity of the iPhone will help push this down as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If anything I use it less because the tethering isn't as stable and I mark this up to their 3G network, not the phone.Hmm, using the same network connection with a different phone gets you worse performance and you deduce this is b/c of the network which hasn't changed?
Yeah the extra $20 for the data for a specific type of phone is no fun, but that is what the market will accept given the enormous popularity of the phone.
As a GS owner, I hope the competition and the coming non-exclusivity of the iPhone will help push this down as well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461684</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Fake Steve Jobs" aka Daniel Lyons is well known to hate Apple in actuality. He's basically a MS shill in disguise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Fake Steve Jobs " aka Daniel Lyons is well known to hate Apple in actuality .
He 's basically a MS shill in disguise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Fake Steve Jobs" aka Daniel Lyons is well known to hate Apple in actuality.
He's basically a MS shill in disguise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016</id>
	<title>Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1259688420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't fall for the crap that network bandwidth is somehow limited because of usage problems. That's never been the issue with AT&amp;T's network. The problem is simply that they don't have enough cell tower capacity to handle that many simultaneous users. This is why your phone service cuts out in very crowded areas.</p><p>So if a bunch of people simultaneously try to use the network, the cells will max out and a lot of people will be out of coverage, but the network as a whole will continue to run just fine.</p><p>Getting AT&amp;T to increase cell density is a nice goal, but so is getting cells to remote areas. It's a matter of priorities, but a covered area that has insufficient capacity is better than an uncovered area with zero capacity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't fall for the crap that network bandwidth is somehow limited because of usage problems .
That 's never been the issue with AT&amp;T 's network .
The problem is simply that they do n't have enough cell tower capacity to handle that many simultaneous users .
This is why your phone service cuts out in very crowded areas.So if a bunch of people simultaneously try to use the network , the cells will max out and a lot of people will be out of coverage , but the network as a whole will continue to run just fine.Getting AT&amp;T to increase cell density is a nice goal , but so is getting cells to remote areas .
It 's a matter of priorities , but a covered area that has insufficient capacity is better than an uncovered area with zero capacity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't fall for the crap that network bandwidth is somehow limited because of usage problems.
That's never been the issue with AT&amp;T's network.
The problem is simply that they don't have enough cell tower capacity to handle that many simultaneous users.
This is why your phone service cuts out in very crowded areas.So if a bunch of people simultaneously try to use the network, the cells will max out and a lot of people will be out of coverage, but the network as a whole will continue to run just fine.Getting AT&amp;T to increase cell density is a nice goal, but so is getting cells to remote areas.
It's a matter of priorities, but a covered area that has insufficient capacity is better than an uncovered area with zero capacity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460540</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1259693760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's depressing coming back to the US and realize how much we're getting screwed by the phone companies compared to else where.</p></div><p>The US is looking more and more like a 3rd world country just as 3rd would countries are starting to look modern.  We haven't invested in building and infrastructure.  Our trains are useless.  Public transportation is a joke.  Train stations and airports are in terrible.  Our internet is substandard in most places; you can't even get FIOS in most of NYC while some places in the country don't have anything better than dialup.  Our cell phone networks are crappy and overpriced.
</p><p>How do we expect to compete with the rest of the world?  If I owned a company and was free to pick a location anywhere in the world, I don't think I'd put it in the US.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's depressing coming back to the US and realize how much we 're getting screwed by the phone companies compared to else where.The US is looking more and more like a 3rd world country just as 3rd would countries are starting to look modern .
We have n't invested in building and infrastructure .
Our trains are useless .
Public transportation is a joke .
Train stations and airports are in terrible .
Our internet is substandard in most places ; you ca n't even get FIOS in most of NYC while some places in the country do n't have anything better than dialup .
Our cell phone networks are crappy and overpriced .
How do we expect to compete with the rest of the world ?
If I owned a company and was free to pick a location anywhere in the world , I do n't think I 'd put it in the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's depressing coming back to the US and realize how much we're getting screwed by the phone companies compared to else where.The US is looking more and more like a 3rd world country just as 3rd would countries are starting to look modern.
We haven't invested in building and infrastructure.
Our trains are useless.
Public transportation is a joke.
Train stations and airports are in terrible.
Our internet is substandard in most places; you can't even get FIOS in most of NYC while some places in the country don't have anything better than dialup.
Our cell phone networks are crappy and overpriced.
How do we expect to compete with the rest of the world?
If I owned a company and was free to pick a location anywhere in the world, I don't think I'd put it in the US.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459096</id>
	<title>CGI SCRIPT</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259688720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not have a CGI script that outputs<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/dev/urandom that everyone on AT&amp;T can load up?.<br>I dunno if that would be the best way to eat up ze bandwithz or even if that works.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not have a CGI script that outputs /dev/urandom that everyone on AT&amp;T can load up ? .I dunno if that would be the best way to eat up ze bandwithz or even if that works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not have a CGI script that outputs /dev/urandom that everyone on AT&amp;T can load up?.I dunno if that would be the best way to eat up ze bandwithz or even if that works.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459560</id>
	<title>Re:Liability for missed 911 call?</title>
	<author>Amouth</author>
	<datestamp>1259690460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if AT&amp;T's tower switches fail to prioritize a 911 call ahead of generic data traffic then AT&amp;T should be liable for not providing the required 911 service.</p><p>some funny things happen with cell phones when you dial 911 - they are not treated as a general phone call.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if AT&amp;T 's tower switches fail to prioritize a 911 call ahead of generic data traffic then AT&amp;T should be liable for not providing the required 911 service.some funny things happen with cell phones when you dial 911 - they are not treated as a general phone call .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if AT&amp;T's tower switches fail to prioritize a 911 call ahead of generic data traffic then AT&amp;T should be liable for not providing the required 911 service.some funny things happen with cell phones when you dial 911 - they are not treated as a general phone call.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459754</id>
	<title>Date swinkle</title>
	<author>EncryptedBit</author>
	<datestamp>1259691060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My calendar app show that Friday December 19 will not occur until 2014.  This year Dec. 19 is a Saturday.  So is Fake Steve planning a massive buildup for this, with a five year effort?</htmltext>
<tokenext>My calendar app show that Friday December 19 will not occur until 2014 .
This year Dec. 19 is a Saturday .
So is Fake Steve planning a massive buildup for this , with a five year effort ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My calendar app show that Friday December 19 will not occur until 2014.
This year Dec. 19 is a Saturday.
So is Fake Steve planning a massive buildup for this, with a five year effort?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462466</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>BACPro</author>
	<datestamp>1259700420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please explain this to me.<br>The phone is less than perfect, you dislike Apple as a company, yet you still purchase the iPhone.</p><p>If you don't support a position a company takes, don't give them your money. Money is all they have to guage their success.</p><p>I purchased an iPod Touch Gen 1 then discovered how poorly they treat their customers, and won't get bitten again. $10 upgrade for cut and paste? 10$ upgrade for slower response? No thanks. Nice device, good UI, but the company sucks. iTunes is a bloated, slow, buggy piece of software (on the PC, unsure on Apple hardware)</p><p>Ditto for Sony. Proprietary and expensive gear, rootkits on audio disks, and so on.<br>They make some nice looking and performing gear, but I won't give them a dime because I disagree with their corporate tactics.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/rant off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please explain this to me.The phone is less than perfect , you dislike Apple as a company , yet you still purchase the iPhone.If you do n't support a position a company takes , do n't give them your money .
Money is all they have to guage their success.I purchased an iPod Touch Gen 1 then discovered how poorly they treat their customers , and wo n't get bitten again .
$ 10 upgrade for cut and paste ?
10 $ upgrade for slower response ?
No thanks .
Nice device , good UI , but the company sucks .
iTunes is a bloated , slow , buggy piece of software ( on the PC , unsure on Apple hardware ) Ditto for Sony .
Proprietary and expensive gear , rootkits on audio disks , and so on.They make some nice looking and performing gear , but I wo n't give them a dime because I disagree with their corporate tactics .
/rant off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please explain this to me.The phone is less than perfect, you dislike Apple as a company, yet you still purchase the iPhone.If you don't support a position a company takes, don't give them your money.
Money is all they have to guage their success.I purchased an iPod Touch Gen 1 then discovered how poorly they treat their customers, and won't get bitten again.
$10 upgrade for cut and paste?
10$ upgrade for slower response?
No thanks.
Nice device, good UI, but the company sucks.
iTunes is a bloated, slow, buggy piece of software (on the PC, unsure on Apple hardware)Ditto for Sony.
Proprietary and expensive gear, rootkits on audio disks, and so on.They make some nice looking and performing gear, but I won't give them a dime because I disagree with their corporate tactics.
/rant off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30474000</id>
	<title>Re:Liability for missed 911 call?</title>
	<author>dwightk</author>
	<datestamp>1261067880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>some funny things happen with cell phones when you dial 911 - they are not treated as a general phone call.</p></div><p>Yeah, like when I dialed 911 on my cell-phone in Durham, NC and it rang 29 times before I gave up and hung up.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>some funny things happen with cell phones when you dial 911 - they are not treated as a general phone call.Yeah , like when I dialed 911 on my cell-phone in Durham , NC and it rang 29 times before I gave up and hung up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>some funny things happen with cell phones when you dial 911 - they are not treated as a general phone call.Yeah, like when I dialed 911 on my cell-phone in Durham, NC and it rang 29 times before I gave up and hung up.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460882</id>
	<title>The point is not to disrupt service...</title>
	<author>nathan.fulton</author>
	<datestamp>1259694900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seems as if slashdot has entirely missed the point.  The goal isn't to maliciously take down AT&amp;T's networks, it's to demonstrate that either 1) AT&amp;T is charging for services it's not capable of offering, or 2) that AT&amp;T claims that the iPhone/3G users strain the network is hogwash.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems as if slashdot has entirely missed the point .
The goal is n't to maliciously take down AT&amp;T 's networks , it 's to demonstrate that either 1 ) AT&amp;T is charging for services it 's not capable of offering , or 2 ) that AT&amp;T claims that the iPhone/3G users strain the network is hogwash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems as if slashdot has entirely missed the point.
The goal isn't to maliciously take down AT&amp;T's networks, it's to demonstrate that either 1) AT&amp;T is charging for services it's not capable of offering, or 2) that AT&amp;T claims that the iPhone/3G users strain the network is hogwash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463668</id>
	<title>Re:Bait and swtich?</title>
	<author>1080bogus</author>
	<datestamp>1259661120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know if the FCC should look into it but it gives you the ability to get out of your contract without fee because it violates the contract you and ATT agreed to</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if the FCC should look into it but it gives you the ability to get out of your contract without fee because it violates the contract you and ATT agreed to</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if the FCC should look into it but it gives you the ability to get out of your contract without fee because it violates the contract you and ATT agreed to</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459886</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1259691420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The plans aren't unlimited (at least as far as I understand reality), they are just unmetered. If the end game results in ATT charging people for what they use, who exactly suffers?</p><p>(I don't expect ATT to actually charge people what I see as reasonable prices relative to their costs for providing services, but that's just smart business on their part, there are many people who are willing to far more than what I see as reasonable, to the point that they pay large amounts to use a congested network)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The plans are n't unlimited ( at least as far as I understand reality ) , they are just unmetered .
If the end game results in ATT charging people for what they use , who exactly suffers ?
( I do n't expect ATT to actually charge people what I see as reasonable prices relative to their costs for providing services , but that 's just smart business on their part , there are many people who are willing to far more than what I see as reasonable , to the point that they pay large amounts to use a congested network )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The plans aren't unlimited (at least as far as I understand reality), they are just unmetered.
If the end game results in ATT charging people for what they use, who exactly suffers?
(I don't expect ATT to actually charge people what I see as reasonable prices relative to their costs for providing services, but that's just smart business on their part, there are many people who are willing to far more than what I see as reasonable, to the point that they pay large amounts to use a congested network)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459570</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>ptbarnett</author>
	<datestamp>1259690460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I just got back from a trip to India. In terms of mobiles, the US is lightyears behind them.</p></div><p>

That's because in terms of landlines, India is light years behind the US.</p><p>

In the developing world, landline phone systems are in shambles.  Many of them are state-run monopolies, and quality and availability is non-existent.  People had to literally wait months or years to get new phone service.</p><p>

Mobile phone services were a way around that:  private companies could build out a cellular network without running wires.  Once the price of cell phones came down, it was affordable for almost anyone.  For those that still can't afford it, "renting" a handset for a few minutes at a time has become a cottage industry.</p><p>

In the US, cell phone networks were developed for a completely different market:  the businessman (or woman) that needs a phone during the working day.  That market still exists, and is lucrative for the cell phone providers.  All the alternatives are designed to avoid cannibalizing that market.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just got back from a trip to India .
In terms of mobiles , the US is lightyears behind them .
That 's because in terms of landlines , India is light years behind the US .
In the developing world , landline phone systems are in shambles .
Many of them are state-run monopolies , and quality and availability is non-existent .
People had to literally wait months or years to get new phone service .
Mobile phone services were a way around that : private companies could build out a cellular network without running wires .
Once the price of cell phones came down , it was affordable for almost anyone .
For those that still ca n't afford it , " renting " a handset for a few minutes at a time has become a cottage industry .
In the US , cell phone networks were developed for a completely different market : the businessman ( or woman ) that needs a phone during the working day .
That market still exists , and is lucrative for the cell phone providers .
All the alternatives are designed to avoid cannibalizing that market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just got back from a trip to India.
In terms of mobiles, the US is lightyears behind them.
That's because in terms of landlines, India is light years behind the US.
In the developing world, landline phone systems are in shambles.
Many of them are state-run monopolies, and quality and availability is non-existent.
People had to literally wait months or years to get new phone service.
Mobile phone services were a way around that:  private companies could build out a cellular network without running wires.
Once the price of cell phones came down, it was affordable for almost anyone.
For those that still can't afford it, "renting" a handset for a few minutes at a time has become a cottage industry.
In the US, cell phone networks were developed for a completely different market:  the businessman (or woman) that needs a phone during the working day.
That market still exists, and is lucrative for the cell phone providers.
All the alternatives are designed to avoid cannibalizing that market.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460302</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Option</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259692860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you own an S&amp;P 500 Index mutual fund - then you are one of the shareholders.  So, you're screwing yourself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you own an S&amp;P 500 Index mutual fund - then you are one of the shareholders .
So , you 're screwing yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you own an S&amp;P 500 Index mutual fund - then you are one of the shareholders.
So, you're screwing yourself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461238</id>
	<title>Why wait till the year 2014?</title>
	<author>PalmKiller</author>
	<datestamp>1259696220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, will the iphone even really matter anymore in 2014 (the next December with a Friday 19th).  Why don't they just do that Friday 18th of 2009, or maybe Saturday 19th 2009 instead?  Seems it would be a lot more timely and useful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , will the iphone even really matter anymore in 2014 ( the next December with a Friday 19th ) .
Why do n't they just do that Friday 18th of 2009 , or maybe Saturday 19th 2009 instead ?
Seems it would be a lot more timely and useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, will the iphone even really matter anymore in 2014 (the next December with a Friday 19th).
Why don't they just do that Friday 18th of 2009, or maybe Saturday 19th 2009 instead?
Seems it would be a lot more timely and useful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461636</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Option</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And i will file a lawsuit against you for "stealing" my tax dollars wasting FCC resources. </p><p>Grow up, if you don't like At&amp;T use someone else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And i will file a lawsuit against you for " stealing " my tax dollars wasting FCC resources .
Grow up , if you do n't like At&amp;T use someone else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And i will file a lawsuit against you for "stealing" my tax dollars wasting FCC resources.
Grow up, if you don't like At&amp;T use someone else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460998</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the 3\% AT&amp;T is talking about use 20GB or more and reading some forums people brag how they did it by jailbreaking and tethering<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>the unlimited data plan is if you follow the TOS. jailbreaking and tethering is against the TOS </p></div><p>And you know this notorious 3\% exists how? You just taking AT&amp;T's word for it? And if people are tethering so what? Is the iPhone US only? Do non-US customers not tether? Doesn't AT&amp;T sell 3G cards for laptops?</p><p>This wouldn't be the first time they've offered unlimited data and then retracted it:</p><p>http://www.pocketables.net/2008/06/how-to-get-att.html</p><p>In fact, they still advertise unlimited data plans on their website:</p><p>http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/services/services-list.jsp?catId=cat1470003&amp;catName=Messaging+\%26+Data</p><p>http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/services/serviceDetails.jsp?wtSlotClick=1-002B7I-0-1&amp;WT.svl=calltoaction&amp;LOSGId=&amp;skuId=sku1160058&amp;catId=cat1470003&amp;\_requestid=229001</p><p><div class="quote"><p>You've got it all, for just $1 a day</p><p>Stay connected anytime, all the time. For a low monthly fee, Messaging &amp; Data Unlimited gives you unlimited text, picture, video, and instant messaging, as well as unlimited access to mobile Web, search, email, apps, and more. Now you can spend countless hours on some of your favorite Web sites like &ndash; CNN, ESPN&#174;, The Weather Channel&#174;, MySpace&#174;, Facebook&#174;, Twitter, MTV, YouTube, Yahoo!&#174; &ndash; or download games, music, or TV clips from your favorite shows.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the 3 \ % AT&amp;T is talking about use 20GB or more and reading some forums people brag how they did it by jailbreaking and tethering ...the unlimited data plan is if you follow the TOS .
jailbreaking and tethering is against the TOS And you know this notorious 3 \ % exists how ?
You just taking AT&amp;T 's word for it ?
And if people are tethering so what ?
Is the iPhone US only ?
Do non-US customers not tether ?
Does n't AT&amp;T sell 3G cards for laptops ? This would n't be the first time they 've offered unlimited data and then retracted it : http : //www.pocketables.net/2008/06/how-to-get-att.htmlIn fact , they still advertise unlimited data plans on their website : http : //www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/services/services-list.jsp ? catId = cat1470003&amp;catName = Messaging + \ % 26 + Datahttp : //www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/services/serviceDetails.jsp ? wtSlotClick = 1-002B7I-0-1&amp;WT.svl = calltoaction&amp;LOSGId = &amp;skuId = sku1160058&amp;catId = cat1470003&amp; \ _requestid = 229001You 've got it all , for just $ 1 a dayStay connected anytime , all the time .
For a low monthly fee , Messaging &amp; Data Unlimited gives you unlimited text , picture , video , and instant messaging , as well as unlimited access to mobile Web , search , email , apps , and more .
Now you can spend countless hours on some of your favorite Web sites like    CNN , ESPN   , The Weather Channel   , MySpace   , Facebook   , Twitter , MTV , YouTube , Yahoo !      or download games , music , or TV clips from your favorite shows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the 3\% AT&amp;T is talking about use 20GB or more and reading some forums people brag how they did it by jailbreaking and tethering ...the unlimited data plan is if you follow the TOS.
jailbreaking and tethering is against the TOS And you know this notorious 3\% exists how?
You just taking AT&amp;T's word for it?
And if people are tethering so what?
Is the iPhone US only?
Do non-US customers not tether?
Doesn't AT&amp;T sell 3G cards for laptops?This wouldn't be the first time they've offered unlimited data and then retracted it:http://www.pocketables.net/2008/06/how-to-get-att.htmlIn fact, they still advertise unlimited data plans on their website:http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/services/services-list.jsp?catId=cat1470003&amp;catName=Messaging+\%26+Datahttp://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/services/serviceDetails.jsp?wtSlotClick=1-002B7I-0-1&amp;WT.svl=calltoaction&amp;LOSGId=&amp;skuId=sku1160058&amp;catId=cat1470003&amp;\_requestid=229001You've got it all, for just $1 a dayStay connected anytime, all the time.
For a low monthly fee, Messaging &amp; Data Unlimited gives you unlimited text, picture, video, and instant messaging, as well as unlimited access to mobile Web, search, email, apps, and more.
Now you can spend countless hours on some of your favorite Web sites like – CNN, ESPN®, The Weather Channel®, MySpace®, Facebook®, Twitter, MTV, YouTube, Yahoo!® – or download games, music, or TV clips from your favorite shows.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461780</id>
	<title>Looks like AT&amp;T got to him first</title>
	<author>alta</author>
	<datestamp>1259698500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since his site is down, I guess AT&amp;T has launched it's own DDoS, or at least a DoS.  When you're as big as ATT, you don't really need much help from others.  Just point an OC-768 at them and run "ab -c 999999 -n 999999999999999 <a href="https://www.fakesteve.net/" title="fakesteve.net">https://www.fakesteve.net/</a> [fakesteve.net]"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since his site is down , I guess AT&amp;T has launched it 's own DDoS , or at least a DoS .
When you 're as big as ATT , you do n't really need much help from others .
Just point an OC-768 at them and run " ab -c 999999 -n 999999999999999 https : //www.fakesteve.net/ [ fakesteve.net ] "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since his site is down, I guess AT&amp;T has launched it's own DDoS, or at least a DoS.
When you're as big as ATT, you don't really need much help from others.
Just point an OC-768 at them and run "ab -c 999999 -n 999999999999999 https://www.fakesteve.net/ [fakesteve.net]"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30473268</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261064940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you ever think to DROP AT&amp;T?  Don't like them?  Hit them where they hurt in their pocket.  If you don't drop them and keep paying them well its your fault your being f\_cked bt them.  I don't have a bit of problems out of AT&amp;T's phone service.   I don't use them and NEVER will.  Before I use them I will go without a phone.</p><p>Really if you are paying them bastards shit like this is youe fault too.  Your paying Mr. Asshat Bossman of AT&amp;T salary and as long as he gets paid do you really think he cares about your service?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you ever think to DROP AT&amp;T ?
Do n't like them ?
Hit them where they hurt in their pocket .
If you do n't drop them and keep paying them well its your fault your being f \ _cked bt them .
I do n't have a bit of problems out of AT&amp;T 's phone service .
I do n't use them and NEVER will .
Before I use them I will go without a phone.Really if you are paying them bastards shit like this is youe fault too .
Your paying Mr. Asshat Bossman of AT&amp;T salary and as long as he gets paid do you really think he cares about your service ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you ever think to DROP AT&amp;T?
Don't like them?
Hit them where they hurt in their pocket.
If you don't drop them and keep paying them well its your fault your being f\_cked bt them.
I don't have a bit of problems out of AT&amp;T's phone service.
I don't use them and NEVER will.
Before I use them I will go without a phone.Really if you are paying them bastards shit like this is youe fault too.
Your paying Mr. Asshat Bossman of AT&amp;T salary and as long as he gets paid do you really think he cares about your service?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459112</id>
	<title>Won't work</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259688720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is why we can't have anything nice. Please stop acting like children.</p><p>There isn't any way that this could be productive.</p><p>This seems like someone ones misunderstanding of civil disobedience. The idea behind CD is to do something illegal (which this is not) and then be punished for it. Then, the public is so outraged at the punishment, and that causes a policy change. The public is not going to force ATT to change its policies to allow juvenile, hacker (that's what it will be called) behavior.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why we ca n't have anything nice .
Please stop acting like children.There is n't any way that this could be productive.This seems like someone ones misunderstanding of civil disobedience .
The idea behind CD is to do something illegal ( which this is not ) and then be punished for it .
Then , the public is so outraged at the punishment , and that causes a policy change .
The public is not going to force ATT to change its policies to allow juvenile , hacker ( that 's what it will be called ) behavior .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why we can't have anything nice.
Please stop acting like children.There isn't any way that this could be productive.This seems like someone ones misunderstanding of civil disobedience.
The idea behind CD is to do something illegal (which this is not) and then be punished for it.
Then, the public is so outraged at the punishment, and that causes a policy change.
The public is not going to force ATT to change its policies to allow juvenile, hacker (that's what it will be called) behavior.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459180</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1259689080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree.  While I personally agree with Fake Steve Jobs in that the iPhone isn't the cause of AT&amp;T's crap network, the lunacy that people defend the iPhone with is...well, it's baffling.</p><p>EVERY phone has issues, and the iPhone's issues are glaringly bad.  It's a decent device that does its job well, but to claim that it is perfect is like saying 360's don't get teh red ring...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
While I personally agree with Fake Steve Jobs in that the iPhone is n't the cause of AT&amp;T 's crap network , the lunacy that people defend the iPhone with is...well , it 's baffling.EVERY phone has issues , and the iPhone 's issues are glaringly bad .
It 's a decent device that does its job well , but to claim that it is perfect is like saying 360 's do n't get teh red ring.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
While I personally agree with Fake Steve Jobs in that the iPhone isn't the cause of AT&amp;T's crap network, the lunacy that people defend the iPhone with is...well, it's baffling.EVERY phone has issues, and the iPhone's issues are glaringly bad.
It's a decent device that does its job well, but to claim that it is perfect is like saying 360's don't get teh red ring...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459034</id>
	<title>every day is a DOS day</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259688480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"It is unclear if there will be enough support to cause a DDOS"</p><p>It think it is pretty clear it will be - normal usage days on the AT&amp;T network overwhelm it.</p><p>I am getting rid of my iPhone when my contract is up if I can't get away from AT&amp;T.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" It is unclear if there will be enough support to cause a DDOS " It think it is pretty clear it will be - normal usage days on the AT&amp;T network overwhelm it.I am getting rid of my iPhone when my contract is up if I ca n't get away from AT&amp;T .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It is unclear if there will be enough support to cause a DDOS"It think it is pretty clear it will be - normal usage days on the AT&amp;T network overwhelm it.I am getting rid of my iPhone when my contract is up if I can't get away from AT&amp;T.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462870</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>a8ksh4</author>
	<datestamp>1259658420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry, but it's not unlimited, it's unlimited*.

Metro PCS here in CA has an unlimited* data plan, too, that restricts all traffic to and from the device except over port 443 and their (non-functional) proxy on 1328.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , but it 's not unlimited , it 's unlimited * .
Metro PCS here in CA has an unlimited * data plan , too , that restricts all traffic to and from the device except over port 443 and their ( non-functional ) proxy on 1328 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, but it's not unlimited, it's unlimited*.
Metro PCS here in CA has an unlimited* data plan, too, that restricts all traffic to and from the device except over port 443 and their (non-functional) proxy on 1328.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463886</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Option</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1259662140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Let's kill AT&amp;T - screw the shareholders. Time for "too big to fail" to take a nosedive into history.</p></div><p>Unfortunately, we are all riding on the same economic ship; if it goes down then we all go with it. Do you think unemployment is bad now? Just wait until the foundations of the entire economy crumble into dust after Bernanke adopts your advice. The disorderly collapse of Lehman Brothers almost pushed us over the brink. How would you feel if the doors to all of the banks were locked, the FDIC couldn't pay but a fraction of your deposits and the federal government itself was bankrupt (or effectively so)? It has happened several times in Argentina in the last 40 years and the social consequences have been extremely damaging (not anything like what most Americans who weren't alive during the Great Depression are used to or even remember). You can read about it <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic\_history\_of\_Argentina#The\_modern\_era" title="wikipedia.org">here</a> [wikipedia.org]. I don't like bailouts or "too big to fail" either, but the modern economy and monetary system are very complex and IMHO there really are no perfectly just solutions, only some which are relatively "less bad".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's kill AT&amp;T - screw the shareholders .
Time for " too big to fail " to take a nosedive into history.Unfortunately , we are all riding on the same economic ship ; if it goes down then we all go with it .
Do you think unemployment is bad now ?
Just wait until the foundations of the entire economy crumble into dust after Bernanke adopts your advice .
The disorderly collapse of Lehman Brothers almost pushed us over the brink .
How would you feel if the doors to all of the banks were locked , the FDIC could n't pay but a fraction of your deposits and the federal government itself was bankrupt ( or effectively so ) ?
It has happened several times in Argentina in the last 40 years and the social consequences have been extremely damaging ( not anything like what most Americans who were n't alive during the Great Depression are used to or even remember ) .
You can read about it here [ wikipedia.org ] .
I do n't like bailouts or " too big to fail " either , but the modern economy and monetary system are very complex and IMHO there really are no perfectly just solutions , only some which are relatively " less bad " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's kill AT&amp;T - screw the shareholders.
Time for "too big to fail" to take a nosedive into history.Unfortunately, we are all riding on the same economic ship; if it goes down then we all go with it.
Do you think unemployment is bad now?
Just wait until the foundations of the entire economy crumble into dust after Bernanke adopts your advice.
The disorderly collapse of Lehman Brothers almost pushed us over the brink.
How would you feel if the doors to all of the banks were locked, the FDIC couldn't pay but a fraction of your deposits and the federal government itself was bankrupt (or effectively so)?
It has happened several times in Argentina in the last 40 years and the social consequences have been extremely damaging (not anything like what most Americans who weren't alive during the Great Depression are used to or even remember).
You can read about it here [wikipedia.org].
I don't like bailouts or "too big to fail" either, but the modern economy and monetary system are very complex and IMHO there really are no perfectly just solutions, only some which are relatively "less bad".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459996</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Option</title>
	<author>ElectricTurtle</author>
	<datestamp>1259691720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I don't disagree with harassing them via the FCC about services they are obligated to provide, your 'screw the shareholders' attitude is doubtless based on some ignorant conception that those are all wealthy suits on yachts somewhere. The shareholders of AT&amp;T in many cases are rank-and-file Americans who both directly and indirectly buy in via funds. AT&amp;T is no doubt part of a lot of retirement portfolios both for those who are currently retired and those who will be. However I'm sure that granny won't mind running out of money to live on just so you can have your anti-corporate crusade.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I do n't disagree with harassing them via the FCC about services they are obligated to provide , your 'screw the shareholders ' attitude is doubtless based on some ignorant conception that those are all wealthy suits on yachts somewhere .
The shareholders of AT&amp;T in many cases are rank-and-file Americans who both directly and indirectly buy in via funds .
AT&amp;T is no doubt part of a lot of retirement portfolios both for those who are currently retired and those who will be .
However I 'm sure that granny wo n't mind running out of money to live on just so you can have your anti-corporate crusade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I don't disagree with harassing them via the FCC about services they are obligated to provide, your 'screw the shareholders' attitude is doubtless based on some ignorant conception that those are all wealthy suits on yachts somewhere.
The shareholders of AT&amp;T in many cases are rank-and-file Americans who both directly and indirectly buy in via funds.
AT&amp;T is no doubt part of a lot of retirement portfolios both for those who are currently retired and those who will be.
However I'm sure that granny won't mind running out of money to live on just so you can have your anti-corporate crusade.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461008</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>jimbolauski</author>
	<datestamp>1259695440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The best part of you leaving is if you signed a contract and still are serving time you can get out, since ATT changed the terms you can break contract with out penality, then just jail break your iphone and go to tmobile for much cheaper unlimited spotty service.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The best part of you leaving is if you signed a contract and still are serving time you can get out , since ATT changed the terms you can break contract with out penality , then just jail break your iphone and go to tmobile for much cheaper unlimited spotty service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The best part of you leaving is if you signed a contract and still are serving time you can get out, since ATT changed the terms you can break contract with out penality, then just jail break your iphone and go to tmobile for much cheaper unlimited spotty service.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468188</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>Torodung</author>
	<datestamp>1259681340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The post, dubbed 'Operation Chokehold,' wants AT&amp;T customers to use as much data service as they can on Friday, December 18th at noon. While Fake Steve Jobs is notable for its satire, many Twitter and Facebook users seem to be rallying to its cry. It is unclear if there will be enough support to cause a DDOS.</p></div><p>So basically, he's incited the deliberate sabotage of a public communications network. Really?</p><p>I get the feeling "Fake Steve Jobs" is going to be hearing from "Real Homeland Security" soon.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:^/</p><p>--<br>Toro</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The post , dubbed 'Operation Chokehold, ' wants AT&amp;T customers to use as much data service as they can on Friday , December 18th at noon .
While Fake Steve Jobs is notable for its satire , many Twitter and Facebook users seem to be rallying to its cry .
It is unclear if there will be enough support to cause a DDOS.So basically , he 's incited the deliberate sabotage of a public communications network .
Really ? I get the feeling " Fake Steve Jobs " is going to be hearing from " Real Homeland Security " soon .
: ^ /--Toro</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The post, dubbed 'Operation Chokehold,' wants AT&amp;T customers to use as much data service as they can on Friday, December 18th at noon.
While Fake Steve Jobs is notable for its satire, many Twitter and Facebook users seem to be rallying to its cry.
It is unclear if there will be enough support to cause a DDOS.So basically, he's incited the deliberate sabotage of a public communications network.
Really?I get the feeling "Fake Steve Jobs" is going to be hearing from "Real Homeland Security" soon.
:^/--Toro
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460618</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259694000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I agree, and yet I don't. Unlimited means <em>unlimited</em>, it doesn't mean "Within reason."</p><p>AT&amp;T needs to get it's shit together.</p></div><p>Exactly.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , and yet I do n't .
Unlimited means unlimited , it does n't mean " Within reason .
" AT&amp;T needs to get it 's shit together.Exactly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, and yet I don't.
Unlimited means unlimited, it doesn't mean "Within reason.
"AT&amp;T needs to get it's shit together.Exactly.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459468</id>
	<title>I Prefer</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1259690100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Operation Cuckold.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Operation Cuckold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Operation Cuckold.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459924</id>
	<title>Re:Not the best idea</title>
	<author>harmonise</author>
	<datestamp>1259691480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>In addition, what if this actually interferes with an emergency call?</p></div></blockquote><p>People don't place emergency calls over 3G data connections. Those are voice calls.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In addition , what if this actually interferes with an emergency call ? People do n't place emergency calls over 3G data connections .
Those are voice calls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In addition, what if this actually interferes with an emergency call?People don't place emergency calls over 3G data connections.
Those are voice calls.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460858</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>immakiku</author>
	<datestamp>1259694780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just a couple of points:</p><ul>
<li>Part of the startup time problem is that there's no multi-tasking. The app has to write all the stateful information to primary storage and then later load it on startup to give the appearance that it's multi-tasked. I bet if Apple allowed multitasking, many apps would load significantly faster (not that I advocate that, because the battery drains quickly enough as it is).</li><li>The iPhone camera is actually very decent. Although no DSLR, sometimes I rather take pictures with the phone than my normal point and shoot even when I'm carrying it. So if the capabilities of the camera were enhanced I would absolutely notice and appreciate it.</li><li>Actually AT&amp;T allows MMS now, at least in NY.</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a couple of points : Part of the startup time problem is that there 's no multi-tasking .
The app has to write all the stateful information to primary storage and then later load it on startup to give the appearance that it 's multi-tasked .
I bet if Apple allowed multitasking , many apps would load significantly faster ( not that I advocate that , because the battery drains quickly enough as it is ) .The iPhone camera is actually very decent .
Although no DSLR , sometimes I rather take pictures with the phone than my normal point and shoot even when I 'm carrying it .
So if the capabilities of the camera were enhanced I would absolutely notice and appreciate it.Actually AT&amp;T allows MMS now , at least in NY .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a couple of points:
Part of the startup time problem is that there's no multi-tasking.
The app has to write all the stateful information to primary storage and then later load it on startup to give the appearance that it's multi-tasked.
I bet if Apple allowed multitasking, many apps would load significantly faster (not that I advocate that, because the battery drains quickly enough as it is).The iPhone camera is actually very decent.
Although no DSLR, sometimes I rather take pictures with the phone than my normal point and shoot even when I'm carrying it.
So if the capabilities of the camera were enhanced I would absolutely notice and appreciate it.Actually AT&amp;T allows MMS now, at least in NY.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459290</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>Just Some Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1259689380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>i have an iphone 3gs and i max out at 2GB per month if i stream pandora almost all day for a month.</p></div><p>2*1024*1024*1024/(8*3600*30)*8 = 20Kbps. That's some darn good compression they're using.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>i have an iphone 3gs and i max out at 2GB per month if i stream pandora almost all day for a month.2 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024/ ( 8 * 3600 * 30 ) * 8 = 20Kbps .
That 's some darn good compression they 're using .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i have an iphone 3gs and i max out at 2GB per month if i stream pandora almost all day for a month.2*1024*1024*1024/(8*3600*30)*8 = 20Kbps.
That's some darn good compression they're using.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459934</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259691540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I just got back from a trip to India. Calls were around $.01/minute anywhere. Then they had the 'data' plans. Stuff for $10-20 a month with unlimited 3G. </p></div><p>Yeah, doctors in India make about $6000 a year and the common man much less.  I would hope things are cheaper there.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just got back from a trip to India .
Calls were around $ .01/minute anywhere .
Then they had the 'data ' plans .
Stuff for $ 10-20 a month with unlimited 3G .
Yeah , doctors in India make about $ 6000 a year and the common man much less .
I would hope things are cheaper there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just got back from a trip to India.
Calls were around $.01/minute anywhere.
Then they had the 'data' plans.
Stuff for $10-20 a month with unlimited 3G.
Yeah, doctors in India make about $6000 a year and the common man much less.
I would hope things are cheaper there.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460430</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1259693340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mine is jailbroken for the following reasons: 1) so I can background (not suspend) TomTom when answering a call 2) so I could customize springboard with a 5x5 layout and skin it to MY liking rather than Steve Jobs' liking and 3) so I can get a bash script and SSH for running shell scripts I wrote for server monitoring and maintenance.</p><p>I don't use voip clients over 3G with my iPhone, and I don't otherwise abuse the network despite having jailbroken it, nor am I running any unauthorised services. I merely customized my phone, just as the first sale doctrine allows.</p><p>I watch video and listen to streamed music constantly. However I have used WiFi whenever possible. My current monthly use is 116.23MB, 21 days into the 30-day billing cycle.  My average is around 250MB or so, nowhere near the unpublished caps on the "unlimited" service. My highest to date is around 900MB or so, when I was downloading apps constantly. My peak came months before I did the jailbreak (I did the jailbreak Thanksgiving weekend), so jailbreaking it has nothing to do with the bandwidth I use.</p><p>Although I am nowhere near any unpublished limit, I am very angry that AT&amp;T is even considering blaming the customer for their network problems. THEY are the ones who ADVERTISED an OFFER to me, and they unashamedly accepted the money from me for their advertised service. Why should they be shocked when customers like me actually take advantage of the service that AT&amp;T is so willing to sell? For the customers they plan to terminate, are they going to unlock those smartphones since AT&amp;T the customer is acting in good faith, and it is AT&amp;T breaking the contract? Or, could the customer sue AT&amp;T for breach of contract and win punitive damages on top of the cost of a locked smartphone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mine is jailbroken for the following reasons : 1 ) so I can background ( not suspend ) TomTom when answering a call 2 ) so I could customize springboard with a 5x5 layout and skin it to MY liking rather than Steve Jobs ' liking and 3 ) so I can get a bash script and SSH for running shell scripts I wrote for server monitoring and maintenance.I do n't use voip clients over 3G with my iPhone , and I do n't otherwise abuse the network despite having jailbroken it , nor am I running any unauthorised services .
I merely customized my phone , just as the first sale doctrine allows.I watch video and listen to streamed music constantly .
However I have used WiFi whenever possible .
My current monthly use is 116.23MB , 21 days into the 30-day billing cycle .
My average is around 250MB or so , nowhere near the unpublished caps on the " unlimited " service .
My highest to date is around 900MB or so , when I was downloading apps constantly .
My peak came months before I did the jailbreak ( I did the jailbreak Thanksgiving weekend ) , so jailbreaking it has nothing to do with the bandwidth I use.Although I am nowhere near any unpublished limit , I am very angry that AT&amp;T is even considering blaming the customer for their network problems .
THEY are the ones who ADVERTISED an OFFER to me , and they unashamedly accepted the money from me for their advertised service .
Why should they be shocked when customers like me actually take advantage of the service that AT&amp;T is so willing to sell ?
For the customers they plan to terminate , are they going to unlock those smartphones since AT&amp;T the customer is acting in good faith , and it is AT&amp;T breaking the contract ?
Or , could the customer sue AT&amp;T for breach of contract and win punitive damages on top of the cost of a locked smartphone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mine is jailbroken for the following reasons: 1) so I can background (not suspend) TomTom when answering a call 2) so I could customize springboard with a 5x5 layout and skin it to MY liking rather than Steve Jobs' liking and 3) so I can get a bash script and SSH for running shell scripts I wrote for server monitoring and maintenance.I don't use voip clients over 3G with my iPhone, and I don't otherwise abuse the network despite having jailbroken it, nor am I running any unauthorised services.
I merely customized my phone, just as the first sale doctrine allows.I watch video and listen to streamed music constantly.
However I have used WiFi whenever possible.
My current monthly use is 116.23MB, 21 days into the 30-day billing cycle.
My average is around 250MB or so, nowhere near the unpublished caps on the "unlimited" service.
My highest to date is around 900MB or so, when I was downloading apps constantly.
My peak came months before I did the jailbreak (I did the jailbreak Thanksgiving weekend), so jailbreaking it has nothing to do with the bandwidth I use.Although I am nowhere near any unpublished limit, I am very angry that AT&amp;T is even considering blaming the customer for their network problems.
THEY are the ones who ADVERTISED an OFFER to me, and they unashamedly accepted the money from me for their advertised service.
Why should they be shocked when customers like me actually take advantage of the service that AT&amp;T is so willing to sell?
For the customers they plan to terminate, are they going to unlock those smartphones since AT&amp;T the customer is acting in good faith, and it is AT&amp;T breaking the contract?
Or, could the customer sue AT&amp;T for breach of contract and win punitive damages on top of the cost of a locked smartphone?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461242</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe it's the phone</title>
	<author>Ma8thew</author>
	<datestamp>1259696220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>By and large, international users of the iPhone are not experiencing the same crippling 3G data problems AT&amp;T users have. The iPhone may have lower sensitivity, but AT&amp;T users are unable to connect due to the volume of users in large cities. That, and the fact that users of other 3G phones on AT&amp;T have the same problems.</htmltext>
<tokenext>By and large , international users of the iPhone are not experiencing the same crippling 3G data problems AT&amp;T users have .
The iPhone may have lower sensitivity , but AT&amp;T users are unable to connect due to the volume of users in large cities .
That , and the fact that users of other 3G phones on AT&amp;T have the same problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By and large, international users of the iPhone are not experiencing the same crippling 3G data problems AT&amp;T users have.
The iPhone may have lower sensitivity, but AT&amp;T users are unable to connect due to the volume of users in large cities.
That, and the fact that users of other 3G phones on AT&amp;T have the same problems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462572</id>
	<title>Re:Bait and swtich?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259700780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, they're doing that in Canada and our toothless corporate lapdog the CRTC just rubber stamped it. So there you go.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , they 're doing that in Canada and our toothless corporate lapdog the CRTC just rubber stamped it .
So there you go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, they're doing that in Canada and our toothless corporate lapdog the CRTC just rubber stamped it.
So there you go.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459566</id>
	<title>This is just stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259690460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Instead of being a whiny baby and potentially disrupting service for others, here's an idea: CANCEL YOUR FUCKING CONTRACT.  Whatever happens with this stunt, AT&amp;T will just brush it off; it's harder to dismiss a mass exodus of customers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of being a whiny baby and potentially disrupting service for others , here 's an idea : CANCEL YOUR FUCKING CONTRACT .
Whatever happens with this stunt , AT&amp;T will just brush it off ; it 's harder to dismiss a mass exodus of customers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of being a whiny baby and potentially disrupting service for others, here's an idea: CANCEL YOUR FUCKING CONTRACT.
Whatever happens with this stunt, AT&amp;T will just brush it off; it's harder to dismiss a mass exodus of customers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460218</id>
	<title>Will this help?</title>
	<author>palmerj3</author>
	<datestamp>1259692500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ironically, ending the unlimited data plan would prevent this planned DDOS.  If anything, this will reinforce their decision.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ironically , ending the unlimited data plan would prevent this planned DDOS .
If anything , this will reinforce their decision .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ironically, ending the unlimited data plan would prevent this planned DDOS.
If anything, this will reinforce their decision.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466282</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>Coren22</author>
	<datestamp>1259670000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I realized I missed some of your points, so an additional post.</p><p>Yes, I have been in the smartphone industry since before the phone was built in, I worked with many of the earlier Windows CE devices and I find WinMo to be actually quite good.  My previous phone was a WinMo flip phone that I cannot recall the name of, and it worked pretty well, with some odd quirks occasionally that I think were hardware related.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I realized I missed some of your points , so an additional post.Yes , I have been in the smartphone industry since before the phone was built in , I worked with many of the earlier Windows CE devices and I find WinMo to be actually quite good .
My previous phone was a WinMo flip phone that I can not recall the name of , and it worked pretty well , with some odd quirks occasionally that I think were hardware related .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I realized I missed some of your points, so an additional post.Yes, I have been in the smartphone industry since before the phone was built in, I worked with many of the earlier Windows CE devices and I find WinMo to be actually quite good.
My previous phone was a WinMo flip phone that I cannot recall the name of, and it worked pretty well, with some odd quirks occasionally that I think were hardware related.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459552</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>massysett</author>
	<datestamp>1259690400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>hree of the four big providers have very little difference between them. They all have the exact same price plan for minutes. The only difference is the extra features offered.</p></div><p>Tell that to the ATT iPhone customers who wish Verizon would get an iPhone because the ATT network is no good, or to the Verizon customers who think they don't have any good devices available, or to the Sprint customers who are enjoying 4G.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>hree of the four big providers have very little difference between them .
They all have the exact same price plan for minutes .
The only difference is the extra features offered.Tell that to the ATT iPhone customers who wish Verizon would get an iPhone because the ATT network is no good , or to the Verizon customers who think they do n't have any good devices available , or to the Sprint customers who are enjoying 4G .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hree of the four big providers have very little difference between them.
They all have the exact same price plan for minutes.
The only difference is the extra features offered.Tell that to the ATT iPhone customers who wish Verizon would get an iPhone because the ATT network is no good, or to the Verizon customers who think they don't have any good devices available, or to the Sprint customers who are enjoying 4G.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462048</id>
	<title>And in this corner</title>
	<author>Uosdwis</author>
	<datestamp>1259699340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well there is a response from AT&amp;T:</p><p><i>We understand that fakesteve.net is primarily a satirical forum, but there is nothing amusing about advocating that customers attempt to deliberately degrade service on a network that provides critical communications services for more than 80 million customers. We know that the vast majority of customers will see this action for what it is: an irresponsible and pointless scheme to draw attention to a blog.<br></i></p><p><a href="http://www.cultofmac.com/att-responds-to-fake-steves-operation-chokehold/23509" title="cultofmac.com">http://www.cultofmac.com/att-responds-to-fake-steves-operation-chokehold/23509</a> [cultofmac.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well there is a response from AT&amp;T : We understand that fakesteve.net is primarily a satirical forum , but there is nothing amusing about advocating that customers attempt to deliberately degrade service on a network that provides critical communications services for more than 80 million customers .
We know that the vast majority of customers will see this action for what it is : an irresponsible and pointless scheme to draw attention to a blog.http : //www.cultofmac.com/att-responds-to-fake-steves-operation-chokehold/23509 [ cultofmac.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well there is a response from AT&amp;T:We understand that fakesteve.net is primarily a satirical forum, but there is nothing amusing about advocating that customers attempt to deliberately degrade service on a network that provides critical communications services for more than 80 million customers.
We know that the vast majority of customers will see this action for what it is: an irresponsible and pointless scheme to draw attention to a blog.http://www.cultofmac.com/att-responds-to-fake-steves-operation-chokehold/23509 [cultofmac.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466084</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe it's the phone</title>
	<author>ktappe</author>
	<datestamp>1259669160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For an alternative point of view, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/business/13digi.html?\_r=1" title="nytimes.com">this article</a> [nytimes.com] is interesting because it claims that the iPhone design isn't very good and that is what is causing the problems.</p></div><p>That's like blaming Airbus for Sully's ditching in the Hudson. The A320 hasn't had to ditch anywhere else in the world but somehow it's still Airbus' fault?
</p><p>To point: The iPhone would only be at fault if it were dropping calls worldwide. It's not, so very basic troubleshooting tells you to look elsewhere...specifically at something unique to the U.S. where that problem is occurring.
</p><p>I have read that AT&amp;T is mounting a rather significant lobbying effort to try to throw suspicions off of their network. Thus this NYT article and Erin Burnett's ludicrous statements on Jim Kramer.  And why would they be doing that? It wouldn't have anything to do with groundswells of user uprising like this would it? Noooo.....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For an alternative point of view , this article [ nytimes.com ] is interesting because it claims that the iPhone design is n't very good and that is what is causing the problems.That 's like blaming Airbus for Sully 's ditching in the Hudson .
The A320 has n't had to ditch anywhere else in the world but somehow it 's still Airbus ' fault ?
To point : The iPhone would only be at fault if it were dropping calls worldwide .
It 's not , so very basic troubleshooting tells you to look elsewhere...specifically at something unique to the U.S. where that problem is occurring .
I have read that AT&amp;T is mounting a rather significant lobbying effort to try to throw suspicions off of their network .
Thus this NYT article and Erin Burnett 's ludicrous statements on Jim Kramer .
And why would they be doing that ?
It would n't have anything to do with groundswells of user uprising like this would it ?
Noooo.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For an alternative point of view, this article [nytimes.com] is interesting because it claims that the iPhone design isn't very good and that is what is causing the problems.That's like blaming Airbus for Sully's ditching in the Hudson.
The A320 hasn't had to ditch anywhere else in the world but somehow it's still Airbus' fault?
To point: The iPhone would only be at fault if it were dropping calls worldwide.
It's not, so very basic troubleshooting tells you to look elsewhere...specifically at something unique to the U.S. where that problem is occurring.
I have read that AT&amp;T is mounting a rather significant lobbying effort to try to throw suspicions off of their network.
Thus this NYT article and Erin Burnett's ludicrous statements on Jim Kramer.
And why would they be doing that?
It wouldn't have anything to do with groundswells of user uprising like this would it?
Noooo.....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30472574</id>
	<title>Re:Not the best idea</title>
	<author>adamchou</author>
	<datestamp>1261061040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Hell AT&amp;T gets a free stress test of their network which is something they should be doing anyway.</p></div><p>I sure as hell hope they have their engineers prepared to monitor and analyze the cell tower usage to see where and how to improve the network. Its not everyday you get free load testing of your production environment.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hell AT&amp;T gets a free stress test of their network which is something they should be doing anyway.I sure as hell hope they have their engineers prepared to monitor and analyze the cell tower usage to see where and how to improve the network .
Its not everyday you get free load testing of your production environment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Hell AT&amp;T gets a free stress test of their network which is something they should be doing anyway.I sure as hell hope they have their engineers prepared to monitor and analyze the cell tower usage to see where and how to improve the network.
Its not everyday you get free load testing of your production environment.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459232</id>
	<title>Uh oh!</title>
	<author>Ambiguous Coward</author>
	<datestamp>1259689200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretend-inciting a virtual cyber riot? Why, that hypothetically violates some possible public safety laws! This guy had better watch out, he might go to meta-jail for his semi-crimes!</p><p>But seriously, AT&amp;T is going to try to sue him.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretend-inciting a virtual cyber riot ?
Why , that hypothetically violates some possible public safety laws !
This guy had better watch out , he might go to meta-jail for his semi-crimes ! But seriously , AT&amp;T is going to try to sue him .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretend-inciting a virtual cyber riot?
Why, that hypothetically violates some possible public safety laws!
This guy had better watch out, he might go to meta-jail for his semi-crimes!But seriously, AT&amp;T is going to try to sue him.
:(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462696</id>
	<title>Friday, December 19th?</title>
	<author>Mal-2</author>
	<datestamp>1259701080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has anyone else noticed that December 19th is a Saturday?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone else noticed that December 19th is a Saturday ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone else noticed that December 19th is a Saturday?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460632</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>Coren22</author>
	<datestamp>1259694060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe someone should email the AT&amp;T and Verizon execs a Definition of unlimited according to Webster:<br><a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Unlimited" title="merriam-webster.com">http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Unlimited</a> [merriam-webster.com]</p><p>Main Entry: unlimited<br>Pronunciation: \-li-m-td\<br>Function: adjective<br>Date: 15th century</p><p>1 : lacking any controls : unrestricted <br>2 : boundless, infinite <br>3 : not bounded by exceptions : undefined </p><p>&mdash; unlimitedly adverb</p><p>Just adding that * of the sibling post doesn't change the definition of unlimited, and it is false advertising even with the *</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe someone should email the AT&amp;T and Verizon execs a Definition of unlimited according to Webster : http : //www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Unlimited [ merriam-webster.com ] Main Entry : unlimitedPronunciation : \ -li-m-td \ Function : adjectiveDate : 15th century1 : lacking any controls : unrestricted 2 : boundless , infinite 3 : not bounded by exceptions : undefined    unlimitedly adverbJust adding that * of the sibling post does n't change the definition of unlimited , and it is false advertising even with the *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe someone should email the AT&amp;T and Verizon execs a Definition of unlimited according to Webster:http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Unlimited [merriam-webster.com]Main Entry: unlimitedPronunciation: \-li-m-td\Function: adjectiveDate: 15th century1 : lacking any controls : unrestricted 2 : boundless, infinite 3 : not bounded by exceptions : undefined — unlimitedly adverbJust adding that * of the sibling post doesn't change the definition of unlimited, and it is false advertising even with the *</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466222</id>
	<title>3000 min day?</title>
	<author>Khashishi</author>
	<datestamp>1259669820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's a lot of minutes. Do you stop the sun often?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a lot of minutes .
Do you stop the sun often ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a lot of minutes.
Do you stop the sun often?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459954</id>
	<title>Destroy something you use...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259691600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Much like the rioters who burned down the supermarkets in their own neighborhood after the Rodney King verdict in Los Angeles in 1992, how is destroying something you use going to solve anything? People in areas that had stores and business burned and looted then had to travel to great distances for basic grocery shopping, which affected innocent "non-rioters" who didn't have transportation and relied on local shops within walking distance. While "bringing the network to its knees" isn't the same as destroying it, it affects people that may need their phone service in an emergency.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Much like the rioters who burned down the supermarkets in their own neighborhood after the Rodney King verdict in Los Angeles in 1992 , how is destroying something you use going to solve anything ?
People in areas that had stores and business burned and looted then had to travel to great distances for basic grocery shopping , which affected innocent " non-rioters " who did n't have transportation and relied on local shops within walking distance .
While " bringing the network to its knees " is n't the same as destroying it , it affects people that may need their phone service in an emergency .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Much like the rioters who burned down the supermarkets in their own neighborhood after the Rodney King verdict in Los Angeles in 1992, how is destroying something you use going to solve anything?
People in areas that had stores and business burned and looted then had to travel to great distances for basic grocery shopping, which affected innocent "non-rioters" who didn't have transportation and relied on local shops within walking distance.
While "bringing the network to its knees" isn't the same as destroying it, it affects people that may need their phone service in an emergency.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461182</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>Ma8thew</author>
	<datestamp>1259696100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I was standing on top of a mountain and could get 4 networks.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Same thing happened to me. Standing at the top of a mountain and noticed that I had full signal. Then I turned around, and noticed that the restaurant behind me had a radio mast on top of it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was standing on top of a mountain and could get 4 networks .
Same thing happened to me .
Standing at the top of a mountain and noticed that I had full signal .
Then I turned around , and noticed that the restaurant behind me had a radio mast on top of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was standing on top of a mountain and could get 4 networks.
Same thing happened to me.
Standing at the top of a mountain and noticed that I had full signal.
Then I turned around, and noticed that the restaurant behind me had a radio mast on top of it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459348</id>
	<title>Minutes and Data</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1259689560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ATT charges what is really huge amounts for the iPhone.  They make the users buy a significant voice package, then add on the data.  Even without many extras, these bills can approach $1000 per year.
<p>
Here is the thing with heavy data users.  Some of them don't use a huge number of voice minutes, so it looks like we are paying the $1000 a year mostly for data.  Additionally, many plans are unlimited minutes at off peak times, , sometimes with nominal charges.  Given unlimited voice, unlimited data, especially at the less than 1/2 mb per second rates.
</p><p>
If they are saying the heavy users are the problem, and they want to move to limited data plan, then they should more honest about the basic plan.  For instance, sell 100 minutes and 100 mb of data for the same price of the current low end plan.  This will give an incentive for users to limit data usage in terms of a real savings.  It is really disingenuous to charge for data usage, and then complain when users actually make use of the data.   In the case of the iPhone, ATT could sell such a plan for $50, even throw in text messages, and probably solve all their problems.  I would cut into revenue, but if ATT is not able to service the product, then they should not sell it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ATT charges what is really huge amounts for the iPhone .
They make the users buy a significant voice package , then add on the data .
Even without many extras , these bills can approach $ 1000 per year .
Here is the thing with heavy data users .
Some of them do n't use a huge number of voice minutes , so it looks like we are paying the $ 1000 a year mostly for data .
Additionally , many plans are unlimited minutes at off peak times , , sometimes with nominal charges .
Given unlimited voice , unlimited data , especially at the less than 1/2 mb per second rates .
If they are saying the heavy users are the problem , and they want to move to limited data plan , then they should more honest about the basic plan .
For instance , sell 100 minutes and 100 mb of data for the same price of the current low end plan .
This will give an incentive for users to limit data usage in terms of a real savings .
It is really disingenuous to charge for data usage , and then complain when users actually make use of the data .
In the case of the iPhone , ATT could sell such a plan for $ 50 , even throw in text messages , and probably solve all their problems .
I would cut into revenue , but if ATT is not able to service the product , then they should not sell it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ATT charges what is really huge amounts for the iPhone.
They make the users buy a significant voice package, then add on the data.
Even without many extras, these bills can approach $1000 per year.
Here is the thing with heavy data users.
Some of them don't use a huge number of voice minutes, so it looks like we are paying the $1000 a year mostly for data.
Additionally, many plans are unlimited minutes at off peak times, , sometimes with nominal charges.
Given unlimited voice, unlimited data, especially at the less than 1/2 mb per second rates.
If they are saying the heavy users are the problem, and they want to move to limited data plan, then they should more honest about the basic plan.
For instance, sell 100 minutes and 100 mb of data for the same price of the current low end plan.
This will give an incentive for users to limit data usage in terms of a real savings.
It is really disingenuous to charge for data usage, and then complain when users actually make use of the data.
In the case of the iPhone, ATT could sell such a plan for $50, even throw in text messages, and probably solve all their problems.
I would cut into revenue, but if ATT is not able to service the product, then they should not sell it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461512</id>
	<title>Re:Liability for missed 911 call?</title>
	<author>jgtg32a</author>
	<datestamp>1259697360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the better moves by the FCC, 911 always works</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the better moves by the FCC , 911 always works</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the better moves by the FCC, 911 always works</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462622</id>
	<title>And in other News...</title>
	<author>Way2Random</author>
	<datestamp>1259700900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Newsweek's Dan Lyons is charged with orchestrating and leading the terrorist attack on AT&amp;T.</p><p>Seriously it seems the days of this kind of civil demonstration or protest are over.  These actions have all been chucked up to terrorism with associated jail time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Newsweek 's Dan Lyons is charged with orchestrating and leading the terrorist attack on AT&amp;T.Seriously it seems the days of this kind of civil demonstration or protest are over .
These actions have all been chucked up to terrorism with associated jail time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Newsweek's Dan Lyons is charged with orchestrating and leading the terrorist attack on AT&amp;T.Seriously it seems the days of this kind of civil demonstration or protest are over.
These actions have all been chucked up to terrorism with associated jail time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461124</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I stream from pandora or last.fm, the rate is indeed between 12-20 Kbps. I'm listening right now and since I started paying attention a few minutes ago, the speed has never exceeded 22.0 Kbps.</p><p>-b</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I stream from pandora or last.fm , the rate is indeed between 12-20 Kbps .
I 'm listening right now and since I started paying attention a few minutes ago , the speed has never exceeded 22.0 Kbps.-b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I stream from pandora or last.fm, the rate is indeed between 12-20 Kbps.
I'm listening right now and since I started paying attention a few minutes ago, the speed has never exceeded 22.0 Kbps.-b</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460744</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>TheEvilOverlord</author>
	<datestamp>1259694420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As various people here keep saying, you have to consider the whole lifecycle.</p><p>I'm not defending the entrenched oligarchy of providers in the US, as they probably are gouging customers to an extent and not being as flexible as they could be.  However when quoting all the amazing price deals available there, you have to consider how this is linked to pay levels, because to a certain extent the amount you pay is going to be affected by how much it costs to run the infrastructure, and paying people is a large part of that.</p><p>There are also probably far fewer regulations on cell tower placement and power.  Building anything probably costs less because labour is again cheap and there are fewer building regulations, environmental regulations and labour laws to comply with.  It all costs money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As various people here keep saying , you have to consider the whole lifecycle.I 'm not defending the entrenched oligarchy of providers in the US , as they probably are gouging customers to an extent and not being as flexible as they could be .
However when quoting all the amazing price deals available there , you have to consider how this is linked to pay levels , because to a certain extent the amount you pay is going to be affected by how much it costs to run the infrastructure , and paying people is a large part of that.There are also probably far fewer regulations on cell tower placement and power .
Building anything probably costs less because labour is again cheap and there are fewer building regulations , environmental regulations and labour laws to comply with .
It all costs money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As various people here keep saying, you have to consider the whole lifecycle.I'm not defending the entrenched oligarchy of providers in the US, as they probably are gouging customers to an extent and not being as flexible as they could be.
However when quoting all the amazing price deals available there, you have to consider how this is linked to pay levels, because to a certain extent the amount you pay is going to be affected by how much it costs to run the infrastructure, and paying people is a large part of that.There are also probably far fewer regulations on cell tower placement and power.
Building anything probably costs less because labour is again cheap and there are fewer building regulations, environmental regulations and labour laws to comply with.
It all costs money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459764</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259691060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I really want to reiterate the point of your first case, because I haven't heard enough people catching on to this: AT&amp;T is blaming network issues on what they consider to be the high bandwidth that smart phones use. To protest this, smart phone users are going to try to bring down the network by hogging as much bandwidth as possible. With their smart phones.
</p><p>
Just wanted to make sure everyone understood exactly what's going on here...
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really want to reiterate the point of your first case , because I have n't heard enough people catching on to this : AT&amp;T is blaming network issues on what they consider to be the high bandwidth that smart phones use .
To protest this , smart phone users are going to try to bring down the network by hogging as much bandwidth as possible .
With their smart phones .
Just wanted to make sure everyone understood exactly what 's going on here.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I really want to reiterate the point of your first case, because I haven't heard enough people catching on to this: AT&amp;T is blaming network issues on what they consider to be the high bandwidth that smart phones use.
To protest this, smart phone users are going to try to bring down the network by hogging as much bandwidth as possible.
With their smart phones.
Just wanted to make sure everyone understood exactly what's going on here...
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30464898</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1259665380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's one thing to expect them to provide a service as set forth in the contract.  It's another thing altogether to expect them to work miracles to provide perfect service.</p><p>There are a multitude of reasons for dropped calls, only one of which is an overloaded tower, and even that may not be within the control of the provider.  Interference, atmospheric ducting, zoning regulations, broadcast power and directionality of the cellular device, etc.  All of these tend to be overlooked when considering "poor service," and the provider is arbitrarily blamed for variables outside of its control.</p><p>By its very nature, a cellular network cannot provide 100\% reliable communications in all locations.  There is a compromise between quality and convenience.  If you can't accept dropped calls, use a hard line.</p><p>I'm not trying to defend bad business practices, just the reality of wireless communications.  At some point "put up a new tower" is simply impossible or impractical.  One could possibly argue that providers shouldn't oversubscribe their service, but due to the mobile element, you never know where people may be congregating at any given time.  To prevent oversubscription entirely, you'd have to limit your customers to n per tower, and tell them they can only get service at that single tower, which is something that probably wouldn't play too well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's one thing to expect them to provide a service as set forth in the contract .
It 's another thing altogether to expect them to work miracles to provide perfect service.There are a multitude of reasons for dropped calls , only one of which is an overloaded tower , and even that may not be within the control of the provider .
Interference , atmospheric ducting , zoning regulations , broadcast power and directionality of the cellular device , etc .
All of these tend to be overlooked when considering " poor service , " and the provider is arbitrarily blamed for variables outside of its control.By its very nature , a cellular network can not provide 100 \ % reliable communications in all locations .
There is a compromise between quality and convenience .
If you ca n't accept dropped calls , use a hard line.I 'm not trying to defend bad business practices , just the reality of wireless communications .
At some point " put up a new tower " is simply impossible or impractical .
One could possibly argue that providers should n't oversubscribe their service , but due to the mobile element , you never know where people may be congregating at any given time .
To prevent oversubscription entirely , you 'd have to limit your customers to n per tower , and tell them they can only get service at that single tower , which is something that probably would n't play too well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's one thing to expect them to provide a service as set forth in the contract.
It's another thing altogether to expect them to work miracles to provide perfect service.There are a multitude of reasons for dropped calls, only one of which is an overloaded tower, and even that may not be within the control of the provider.
Interference, atmospheric ducting, zoning regulations, broadcast power and directionality of the cellular device, etc.
All of these tend to be overlooked when considering "poor service," and the provider is arbitrarily blamed for variables outside of its control.By its very nature, a cellular network cannot provide 100\% reliable communications in all locations.
There is a compromise between quality and convenience.
If you can't accept dropped calls, use a hard line.I'm not trying to defend bad business practices, just the reality of wireless communications.
At some point "put up a new tower" is simply impossible or impractical.
One could possibly argue that providers shouldn't oversubscribe their service, but due to the mobile element, you never know where people may be congregating at any given time.
To prevent oversubscription entirely, you'd have to limit your customers to n per tower, and tell them they can only get service at that single tower, which is something that probably wouldn't play too well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462462</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>Psarchasm</author>
	<datestamp>1259700420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suppose if the US was 1/3 its present size it might have better coverage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose if the US was 1/3 its present size it might have better coverage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose if the US was 1/3 its present size it might have better coverage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459448</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1259690040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget option 3:</p><p>AT&amp;T's network is fucked over more than usual, and some people die because they couldn't make 911 calls.  What, you thought taking down the data connection would have no effect on voice?  HA!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget option 3 : AT&amp;T 's network is fucked over more than usual , and some people die because they could n't make 911 calls .
What , you thought taking down the data connection would have no effect on voice ?
HA !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget option 3:AT&amp;T's network is fucked over more than usual, and some people die because they couldn't make 911 calls.
What, you thought taking down the data connection would have no effect on voice?
HA!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460412</id>
	<title>2 independant studies say AT&amp;T better than Ver</title>
	<author>Caledfwlch</author>
	<datestamp>1259693280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Despite the Verizon ads it appears from 2 independent studies (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/business/13digi.html?\_r=1&amp;em) that, at least in the major metropolitan areas, AT&amp;T does have a more reliable and faster network and the iPhone's "electronics in the phone that connect it to the cell towers, had shortcomings that 'affect both voice and data.'".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Despite the Verizon ads it appears from 2 independent studies ( http : //www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/business/13digi.html ? \ _r = 1&amp;em ) that , at least in the major metropolitan areas , AT&amp;T does have a more reliable and faster network and the iPhone 's " electronics in the phone that connect it to the cell towers , had shortcomings that 'affect both voice and data .
' " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Despite the Verizon ads it appears from 2 independent studies (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/business/13digi.html?\_r=1&amp;em) that, at least in the major metropolitan areas, AT&amp;T does have a more reliable and faster network and the iPhone's "electronics in the phone that connect it to the cell towers, had shortcomings that 'affect both voice and data.
'".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459308</id>
	<title>Huh?</title>
	<author>BlindSpot</author>
	<datestamp>1259689440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay so let me get this straight... show a company you hate their product by creating <b>more</b> demand for it?  Does nobody participating understand economics?!?  Well don't be surprised when they jack up your rates again and cite "increased network demand" as the reason.  Keep at it at you might get to have the same high rates we have here in Canada.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay so let me get this straight... show a company you hate their product by creating more demand for it ?
Does nobody participating understand economics ? ! ?
Well do n't be surprised when they jack up your rates again and cite " increased network demand " as the reason .
Keep at it at you might get to have the same high rates we have here in Canada .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay so let me get this straight... show a company you hate their product by creating more demand for it?
Does nobody participating understand economics?!?
Well don't be surprised when they jack up your rates again and cite "increased network demand" as the reason.
Keep at it at you might get to have the same high rates we have here in Canada.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461714</id>
	<title>AT&amp;T self-created their own problems</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AT&amp;T Pays A 145 Million Dollar Golden Parachute To Edward Whitacre, Jr.</p><p>All of that $145M should have been spent on building out AT&amp;T's wireless infrastructure, but what the hell, Uncle Ed is more important than all of AT&amp;T's customers and employees. What's more, if you worked at AT&amp;T and complained about that kind of crap, you soon found your job outsourced to India with you standing in the unemployment line.</p><p>A more suitable punishment for AT&amp;T would not be a DDoS, but rather for every customer of AT&amp;T to stop paying their AT&amp;T bill for 90 days, or forever. Call it a DDoP, a Distributed Denial of Payment. That should put Ralph de la Vega on the unemployment line, right next to all those people Ed fired, but no, King Ralph has a Golden Parachute of his own. You'll have plenty of bandwidth when all you have is 100 paying customers, Ralph.</p><p>Where is Uncle Ed now? After running the RBOCs and AT&amp;T into the ground, that stinking rat abandoned the sinking ship. He's now at GM, running it into the ground. How many shekels of silver for GM, Judas Whitacre?</p><p>BTW: Verizon will be happy to send you a new SIM for your jail-broken iPhone. That way you can stick it to AT&amp;T and Steve Jobs, at the same time!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AT&amp;T Pays A 145 Million Dollar Golden Parachute To Edward Whitacre , Jr.All of that $ 145M should have been spent on building out AT&amp;T 's wireless infrastructure , but what the hell , Uncle Ed is more important than all of AT&amp;T 's customers and employees .
What 's more , if you worked at AT&amp;T and complained about that kind of crap , you soon found your job outsourced to India with you standing in the unemployment line.A more suitable punishment for AT&amp;T would not be a DDoS , but rather for every customer of AT&amp;T to stop paying their AT&amp;T bill for 90 days , or forever .
Call it a DDoP , a Distributed Denial of Payment .
That should put Ralph de la Vega on the unemployment line , right next to all those people Ed fired , but no , King Ralph has a Golden Parachute of his own .
You 'll have plenty of bandwidth when all you have is 100 paying customers , Ralph.Where is Uncle Ed now ?
After running the RBOCs and AT&amp;T into the ground , that stinking rat abandoned the sinking ship .
He 's now at GM , running it into the ground .
How many shekels of silver for GM , Judas Whitacre ? BTW : Verizon will be happy to send you a new SIM for your jail-broken iPhone .
That way you can stick it to AT&amp;T and Steve Jobs , at the same time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AT&amp;T Pays A 145 Million Dollar Golden Parachute To Edward Whitacre, Jr.All of that $145M should have been spent on building out AT&amp;T's wireless infrastructure, but what the hell, Uncle Ed is more important than all of AT&amp;T's customers and employees.
What's more, if you worked at AT&amp;T and complained about that kind of crap, you soon found your job outsourced to India with you standing in the unemployment line.A more suitable punishment for AT&amp;T would not be a DDoS, but rather for every customer of AT&amp;T to stop paying their AT&amp;T bill for 90 days, or forever.
Call it a DDoP, a Distributed Denial of Payment.
That should put Ralph de la Vega on the unemployment line, right next to all those people Ed fired, but no, King Ralph has a Golden Parachute of his own.
You'll have plenty of bandwidth when all you have is 100 paying customers, Ralph.Where is Uncle Ed now?
After running the RBOCs and AT&amp;T into the ground, that stinking rat abandoned the sinking ship.
He's now at GM, running it into the ground.
How many shekels of silver for GM, Judas Whitacre?BTW: Verizon will be happy to send you a new SIM for your jail-broken iPhone.
That way you can stick it to AT&amp;T and Steve Jobs, at the same time!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459672</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259690760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Three (actually regardless of One or Two): AT&amp;T presses charges against Fake Steve for organizing a DDOS attack against their network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Three ( actually regardless of One or Two ) : AT&amp;T presses charges against Fake Steve for organizing a DDOS attack against their network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Three (actually regardless of One or Two): AT&amp;T presses charges against Fake Steve for organizing a DDOS attack against their network.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459548</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>socrplayr813</author>
	<datestamp>1259690400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not just that we're getting screwed (though we certainly are, to some extent).  A lot of parts of the world don't have the extensive infrastructure the US has for wired phones, which sped their adoption of wireless technology.  When enough of your population relies on a technology, progress comes faster.  The US population has only recently started to shut off their wired phones and, for some groups, it could be decades before they give them up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not just that we 're getting screwed ( though we certainly are , to some extent ) .
A lot of parts of the world do n't have the extensive infrastructure the US has for wired phones , which sped their adoption of wireless technology .
When enough of your population relies on a technology , progress comes faster .
The US population has only recently started to shut off their wired phones and , for some groups , it could be decades before they give them up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not just that we're getting screwed (though we certainly are, to some extent).
A lot of parts of the world don't have the extensive infrastructure the US has for wired phones, which sped their adoption of wireless technology.
When enough of your population relies on a technology, progress comes faster.
The US population has only recently started to shut off their wired phones and, for some groups, it could be decades before they give them up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461052</id>
	<title>Dan Lyons?</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1259695620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing to see here, move along, move along.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing to see here , move along , move along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing to see here, move along, move along.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460570</id>
	<title>Time warp?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259693820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AT&amp;T customers to use as much data service as they can on Friday, December 19th at noon..</p><p>Last I checked December 19th was a Saturday....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AT&amp;T customers to use as much data service as they can on Friday , December 19th at noon..Last I checked December 19th was a Saturday... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AT&amp;T customers to use as much data service as they can on Friday, December 19th at noon..Last I checked December 19th was a Saturday....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459612</id>
	<title>Re:Not the best idea</title>
	<author>socrplayr813</author>
	<datestamp>1259690580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're absolutely right and I doubt the people doing this have thought through it that much, but I think the point of it is more to pound home the idea that AT&amp;T (supposedly) doesn't want to invest in their network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're absolutely right and I doubt the people doing this have thought through it that much , but I think the point of it is more to pound home the idea that AT&amp;T ( supposedly ) does n't want to invest in their network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're absolutely right and I doubt the people doing this have thought through it that much, but I think the point of it is more to pound home the idea that AT&amp;T (supposedly) doesn't want to invest in their network.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459982</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1259691660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>At least you guys have a choice of providers.</i></p><p>Incorrect. Dig down a couple of layers and you will find we, and everybody else, only have one. One, that collude on prices, collect all data for government and the "market" (government, but I repeat myself), and control what you see. There can only be one. Things might change if we ever take conscious control of our governments. Until then, suck it up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least you guys have a choice of providers.Incorrect .
Dig down a couple of layers and you will find we , and everybody else , only have one .
One , that collude on prices , collect all data for government and the " market " ( government , but I repeat myself ) , and control what you see .
There can only be one .
Things might change if we ever take conscious control of our governments .
Until then , suck it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least you guys have a choice of providers.Incorrect.
Dig down a couple of layers and you will find we, and everybody else, only have one.
One, that collude on prices, collect all data for government and the "market" (government, but I repeat myself), and control what you see.
There can only be one.
Things might change if we ever take conscious control of our governments.
Until then, suck it up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460016</id>
	<title>Cognitive Dissonance Impaired?  (Bait and swtich?)</title>
	<author>Gary W. Longsine</author>
	<datestamp>1259691780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, uh, did you stop taking your meds, or go and leave yourself logged in or something?  Idolizing <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John\_Wilkes\_Booth" title="wikipedia.org">John Wilkes Booth</a> [wikipedia.org] (who assassinated the U.S. President Abraham Lincoln and then apparently <a href="http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/lincolnconspiracy/boothdiary.html" title="umkc.edu">blogged about it</a> [umkc.edu]) is typically a sign of libertarianism at least, or anarchism possibly.  Asserting Booth was a patriot doesn't jibe with you wanting the big, bad, out of control states-rights-trampling, wasteful fraudulent and abusive Federal government to save your pathetic hind quarters from a big bad voluntarily formed privately owned profit seeking <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn\_Rand" title="wikipedia.org"> Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum </a> [wikipedia.org] worshipping corporation, now, does it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , uh , did you stop taking your meds , or go and leave yourself logged in or something ?
Idolizing John Wilkes Booth [ wikipedia.org ] ( who assassinated the U.S. President Abraham Lincoln and then apparently blogged about it [ umkc.edu ] ) is typically a sign of libertarianism at least , or anarchism possibly .
Asserting Booth was a patriot does n't jibe with you wanting the big , bad , out of control states-rights-trampling , wasteful fraudulent and abusive Federal government to save your pathetic hind quarters from a big bad voluntarily formed privately owned profit seeking Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum [ wikipedia.org ] worshipping corporation , now , does it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, uh, did you stop taking your meds, or go and leave yourself logged in or something?
Idolizing John Wilkes Booth [wikipedia.org] (who assassinated the U.S. President Abraham Lincoln and then apparently blogged about it [umkc.edu]) is typically a sign of libertarianism at least, or anarchism possibly.
Asserting Booth was a patriot doesn't jibe with you wanting the big, bad, out of control states-rights-trampling, wasteful fraudulent and abusive Federal government to save your pathetic hind quarters from a big bad voluntarily formed privately owned profit seeking  Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum  [wikipedia.org] worshipping corporation, now, does it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462496</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Option</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259700540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>much like the old airlines</i>

they still do this, especially Delta</htmltext>
<tokenext>much like the old airlines they still do this , especially Delta</tokentext>
<sentencetext>much like the old airlines

they still do this, especially Delta</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461460</id>
	<title>Manslaughter charges pending</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dan Lyons started it? The police know whom to charge with manslaughter when the 911 emergency calls can't get through. The civil suits will be even easier to win.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dan Lyons started it ?
The police know whom to charge with manslaughter when the 911 emergency calls ca n't get through .
The civil suits will be even easier to win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dan Lyons started it?
The police know whom to charge with manslaughter when the 911 emergency calls can't get through.
The civil suits will be even easier to win.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462264</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>hguorbray</author>
	<datestamp>1259699880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How will the customers even notice when they already have such spotty service?<br><br>My Music studio is in an industrial area of san jose, ca<br><br>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;hs=uVf&amp;ei=vjYpS6mSA9OvsAbQyq2wDQ&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=spellfullpage&amp;resnum=0&amp;ct=result&amp;cd=2&amp;ved=0CAcQvwUoAQ&amp;&amp;q=495+e+brokaw+rd+san+jose,+ca&amp;spell=1<br><br>and I have to walk 100 yards out to the street before I get a signal back -and even then I have to power cycle my Blackjack2 first.<br><br>-I'm just sayin'</htmltext>
<tokenext>How will the customers even notice when they already have such spotty service ? My Music studio is in an industrial area of san jose , cahttp : //www.google.com/search ? hl = en&amp;client = firefox-a&amp;rls = org.mozilla : en-US : official&amp;hs = uVf&amp;ei = vjYpS6mSA9OvsAbQyq2wDQ&amp;sa = X&amp;oi = spellfullpage&amp;resnum = 0&amp;ct = result&amp;cd = 2&amp;ved = 0CAcQvwUoAQ&amp;&amp;q = 495 + e + brokaw + rd + san + jose , + ca&amp;spell = 1and I have to walk 100 yards out to the street before I get a signal back -and even then I have to power cycle my Blackjack2 first.-I 'm just sayin'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How will the customers even notice when they already have such spotty service?My Music studio is in an industrial area of san jose, cahttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;hs=uVf&amp;ei=vjYpS6mSA9OvsAbQyq2wDQ&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=spellfullpage&amp;resnum=0&amp;ct=result&amp;cd=2&amp;ved=0CAcQvwUoAQ&amp;&amp;q=495+e+brokaw+rd+san+jose,+ca&amp;spell=1and I have to walk 100 yards out to the street before I get a signal back -and even then I have to power cycle my Blackjack2 first.-I'm just sayin'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459386</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>Shakrai</author>
	<datestamp>1259689680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>At least you guys have a choice of providers. Here in Canada, we almost have government-backed monopolies with even higher monthly bills.</p></div><p>What do you think we have here in the US?  Three of the four big providers have very little difference between them.  They all have the exact same price plan for minutes.  The only difference is the extra features offered.  T-Mobile is the only one that actually offers more minutes/cheaper plans.
</p><p>They are all government-backed too.  Think you or I could start a cell phone plan?  Think again.  The spectrum is auctioned off the highest bidder.  For a few billion dollars the entrenched interests can just gobble it all up regardless of whether or not they need it or intend to deploy on it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least you guys have a choice of providers .
Here in Canada , we almost have government-backed monopolies with even higher monthly bills.What do you think we have here in the US ?
Three of the four big providers have very little difference between them .
They all have the exact same price plan for minutes .
The only difference is the extra features offered .
T-Mobile is the only one that actually offers more minutes/cheaper plans .
They are all government-backed too .
Think you or I could start a cell phone plan ?
Think again .
The spectrum is auctioned off the highest bidder .
For a few billion dollars the entrenched interests can just gobble it all up regardless of whether or not they need it or intend to deploy on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least you guys have a choice of providers.
Here in Canada, we almost have government-backed monopolies with even higher monthly bills.What do you think we have here in the US?
Three of the four big providers have very little difference between them.
They all have the exact same price plan for minutes.
The only difference is the extra features offered.
T-Mobile is the only one that actually offers more minutes/cheaper plans.
They are all government-backed too.
Think you or I could start a cell phone plan?
Think again.
The spectrum is auctioned off the highest bidder.
For a few billion dollars the entrenched interests can just gobble it all up regardless of whether or not they need it or intend to deploy on it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460680</id>
	<title>Re:Bait and swtich?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259694240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any change to the plan that you specifically did not agree to gives you the right to terminate said plan without an early termination fee.  Besides, you'd be surprised how far you can actually get for contacting the FCC over stuff like this.  If they do change your service, complain when they try to charge you the outlandish termination fee.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any change to the plan that you specifically did not agree to gives you the right to terminate said plan without an early termination fee .
Besides , you 'd be surprised how far you can actually get for contacting the FCC over stuff like this .
If they do change your service , complain when they try to charge you the outlandish termination fee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any change to the plan that you specifically did not agree to gives you the right to terminate said plan without an early termination fee.
Besides, you'd be surprised how far you can actually get for contacting the FCC over stuff like this.
If they do change your service, complain when they try to charge you the outlandish termination fee.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463918</id>
	<title>What Time Zone?</title>
	<author>Psychotic\_Wrath</author>
	<datestamp>1259662200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I cant access the article. Does anybody know what timezone This is set for? The efforts will be a lot less meaningful if there isnt a timezone specified</htmltext>
<tokenext>I cant access the article .
Does anybody know what timezone This is set for ?
The efforts will be a lot less meaningful if there isnt a timezone specified</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I cant access the article.
Does anybody know what timezone This is set for?
The efforts will be a lot less meaningful if there isnt a timezone specified</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248</id>
	<title>Missing Option</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259689260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm changing my plan to the lowest pricing structure possible.  I am going to log every dropped call and file a FCC complaint as it will have "stolen" minutes from me.</p><p>I have two iPhones with 3000 min day &amp; 3000 min night + rollover, unlimited texting and the required data plan.</p><p>I'll send letters off to the AT&amp;T consumer oversight about the obvious overselling of the data//cell service by AT&amp;T - much like the old airlines used to do with seats and overbooking - betting that the no-shows will prevent bumping.   Here, we have virtual bumping from saturated networks.</p><p>Frankly, AT&amp;T ought to be dissolved - the Corporate Death Penalty and give the shareholders not a dime.  The company has, through several iterations,  demonstrated its gross incompetence too many times to exist.  It is a monopoly and all monopolies must die.  Let's kill AT&amp;T - screw the shareholders.  Time for "too big to fail" to take a nosedive into history.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm changing my plan to the lowest pricing structure possible .
I am going to log every dropped call and file a FCC complaint as it will have " stolen " minutes from me.I have two iPhones with 3000 min day &amp; 3000 min night + rollover , unlimited texting and the required data plan.I 'll send letters off to the AT&amp;T consumer oversight about the obvious overselling of the data//cell service by AT&amp;T - much like the old airlines used to do with seats and overbooking - betting that the no-shows will prevent bumping .
Here , we have virtual bumping from saturated networks.Frankly , AT&amp;T ought to be dissolved - the Corporate Death Penalty and give the shareholders not a dime .
The company has , through several iterations , demonstrated its gross incompetence too many times to exist .
It is a monopoly and all monopolies must die .
Let 's kill AT&amp;T - screw the shareholders .
Time for " too big to fail " to take a nosedive into history .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm changing my plan to the lowest pricing structure possible.
I am going to log every dropped call and file a FCC complaint as it will have "stolen" minutes from me.I have two iPhones with 3000 min day &amp; 3000 min night + rollover, unlimited texting and the required data plan.I'll send letters off to the AT&amp;T consumer oversight about the obvious overselling of the data//cell service by AT&amp;T - much like the old airlines used to do with seats and overbooking - betting that the no-shows will prevent bumping.
Here, we have virtual bumping from saturated networks.Frankly, AT&amp;T ought to be dissolved - the Corporate Death Penalty and give the shareholders not a dime.
The company has, through several iterations,  demonstrated its gross incompetence too many times to exist.
It is a monopoly and all monopolies must die.
Let's kill AT&amp;T - screw the shareholders.
Time for "too big to fail" to take a nosedive into history.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459452</id>
	<title>I don't understand why AT&amp;T VOICE sucks...</title>
	<author>nweaver</author>
	<datestamp>1259690040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Specifically, why it ends up so bad on dropping VOICE calls.  Yes, data is a huge hog.  But the bulk data can be prioritized much lower than voice.</p><p>I could see in Manhattan or San Francisco that the DATA service would suck: too many users, etc.  But why should the voice channel suck so badly too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Specifically , why it ends up so bad on dropping VOICE calls .
Yes , data is a huge hog .
But the bulk data can be prioritized much lower than voice.I could see in Manhattan or San Francisco that the DATA service would suck : too many users , etc .
But why should the voice channel suck so badly too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Specifically, why it ends up so bad on dropping VOICE calls.
Yes, data is a huge hog.
But the bulk data can be prioritized much lower than voice.I could see in Manhattan or San Francisco that the DATA service would suck: too many users, etc.
But why should the voice channel suck so badly too?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459920</id>
	<title>fakesteve.net</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259691480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm, fakesteve.net has been DDOS'd...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm , fakesteve.net has been DDOS 'd.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm, fakesteve.net has been DDOS'd...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459792</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>stms</author>
	<datestamp>1259691120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>20GB pff that's nothing. I tethered my iphone to my pc and use torrented up 50GB.</htmltext>
<tokenext>20GB pff that 's nothing .
I tethered my iphone to my pc and use torrented up 50GB .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>20GB pff that's nothing.
I tethered my iphone to my pc and use torrented up 50GB.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459050</id>
	<title>Angry Slashdotters May Disrupt Service</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1259688540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>www.fakesteve.net</p><p>Error 500 - Internal server error</p><p>An internal server error has occured!<br>Please try again later.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>www.fakesteve.netError 500 - Internal server errorAn internal server error has occured ! Please try again later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>www.fakesteve.netError 500 - Internal server errorAn internal server error has occured!Please try again later.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462628</id>
	<title>Question.</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1259700900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this an issue of AT&amp;T changing the plan from Unlimited to limited, or is this an issue of them simply not being able to sustain the required bandwidth of the users they signed up?</p><p>If they are changing the plans from Unlimited to limited simply because they oversold their networks, then bomb them to hell and back (and keep it up until they promise to upgrade the network and back down from limiting bandwidth).</p><p>(Might I suggest viewing this video from Youtube--You only have to reload every few hours, depending on how fast the connection buffers the video. Took me about 2 hrs on my home PC<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ct8nZ6eTTiY" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ct8nZ6eTTiY</a> [youtube.com] )</p><p>If this is an issue of them blocking certain high-bandwidth apps, then they need to be sued, not DDOSed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this an issue of AT&amp;T changing the plan from Unlimited to limited , or is this an issue of them simply not being able to sustain the required bandwidth of the users they signed up ? If they are changing the plans from Unlimited to limited simply because they oversold their networks , then bomb them to hell and back ( and keep it up until they promise to upgrade the network and back down from limiting bandwidth ) .
( Might I suggest viewing this video from Youtube--You only have to reload every few hours , depending on how fast the connection buffers the video .
Took me about 2 hrs on my home PChttp : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Ct8nZ6eTTiY [ youtube.com ] ) If this is an issue of them blocking certain high-bandwidth apps , then they need to be sued , not DDOSed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this an issue of AT&amp;T changing the plan from Unlimited to limited, or is this an issue of them simply not being able to sustain the required bandwidth of the users they signed up?If they are changing the plans from Unlimited to limited simply because they oversold their networks, then bomb them to hell and back (and keep it up until they promise to upgrade the network and back down from limiting bandwidth).
(Might I suggest viewing this video from Youtube--You only have to reload every few hours, depending on how fast the connection buffers the video.
Took me about 2 hrs on my home PChttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ct8nZ6eTTiY [youtube.com] )If this is an issue of them blocking certain high-bandwidth apps, then they need to be sued, not DDOSed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461392</id>
	<title>Re:Legality?</title>
	<author>Bengie</author>
	<datestamp>1259696820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's more like the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. affect than someone loading 10,000 bots and opening connections.</p><p>As long as everyone is using an authorized app like video streaming/etc, then there should be no problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's more like the / .
affect than someone loading 10,000 bots and opening connections.As long as everyone is using an authorized app like video streaming/etc , then there should be no problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's more like the /.
affect than someone loading 10,000 bots and opening connections.As long as everyone is using an authorized app like video streaming/etc, then there should be no problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459396</id>
	<title>More Ammo for Verizon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259689800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We all know that Verizon likes to touch itself while poking fun at AT&amp;T... Now they'll have even more enjoyment when the iPhone becomes available on the VZW network. "See, our network can handle pussy DDoD attempts, while AT&amp;T's can't!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We all know that Verizon likes to touch itself while poking fun at AT&amp;T... Now they 'll have even more enjoyment when the iPhone becomes available on the VZW network .
" See , our network can handle pussy DDoD attempts , while AT&amp;T 's ca n't !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We all know that Verizon likes to touch itself while poking fun at AT&amp;T... Now they'll have even more enjoyment when the iPhone becomes available on the VZW network.
"See, our network can handle pussy DDoD attempts, while AT&amp;T's can't!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466106</id>
	<title>Re:Legality?</title>
	<author>ktappe</author>
	<datestamp>1259669220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it legal to publicly co-ordinate a DDOS attack on a major US telecom?</p></div><p>It's legal to use your iPhone to watch YouTube at the same time as another iPhone user watches YouTube. I'm sorry if that just happens to occur at 12PM PST on Friday, but yes, that's legal.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it legal to publicly co-ordinate a DDOS attack on a major US telecom ? It 's legal to use your iPhone to watch YouTube at the same time as another iPhone user watches YouTube .
I 'm sorry if that just happens to occur at 12PM PST on Friday , but yes , that 's legal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it legal to publicly co-ordinate a DDOS attack on a major US telecom?It's legal to use your iPhone to watch YouTube at the same time as another iPhone user watches YouTube.
I'm sorry if that just happens to occur at 12PM PST on Friday, but yes, that's legal.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468190</id>
	<title>Re:Bait and swtich?</title>
	<author>jtgd</author>
	<datestamp>1259681340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Me: "Hi, I'd like to complete your cancellation of our contract."
</p><p>AT&amp;T: "OUR cancellation?  How do you figure that?"
</p><p>Me: "Well our contract was for unlimited data access, and you have announced that you no longer offer unlimited data access, so that means you've canceled our contract."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Me : " Hi , I 'd like to complete your cancellation of our contract .
" AT&amp;T : " OUR cancellation ?
How do you figure that ?
" Me : " Well our contract was for unlimited data access , and you have announced that you no longer offer unlimited data access , so that means you 've canceled our contract .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Me: "Hi, I'd like to complete your cancellation of our contract.
"
AT&amp;T: "OUR cancellation?
How do you figure that?
"
Me: "Well our contract was for unlimited data access, and you have announced that you no longer offer unlimited data access, so that means you've canceled our contract.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459930</id>
	<title>Re:Bait and swtich?</title>
	<author>Registered Coward v2</author>
	<datestamp>1259691540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Selling us all unlimited *contracts* that they know they cant deliver, then later switching it to limited while we are still stuck with the contract should be something the FCC should look into.</p></div><p>Actually, such a change in the contract would probably let you get out of the contract without early termination fees.  More likely they will do it for renewals only by no longer offering unlimited plans.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Selling us all unlimited * contracts * that they know they cant deliver , then later switching it to limited while we are still stuck with the contract should be something the FCC should look into.Actually , such a change in the contract would probably let you get out of the contract without early termination fees .
More likely they will do it for renewals only by no longer offering unlimited plans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Selling us all unlimited *contracts* that they know they cant deliver, then later switching it to limited while we are still stuck with the contract should be something the FCC should look into.Actually, such a change in the contract would probably let you get out of the contract without early termination fees.
More likely they will do it for renewals only by no longer offering unlimited plans.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460114</id>
	<title>On another note...I hate this fake Steve Jobs.</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1259692200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I read the  blog the other day, I was curious about whether they switched its writer, since the content seemed so much less intelligent than what was previously there. I'm saddened to see that this is still Lyons's work.</p><p>The old FSJ was witty, creative and had just enough stupidity to make it funny. When I read it yesterday, I saw typical blogger shit. This only strengthens my point.</p><p>As for this "cause," it probably won't do anything, since only a very small percentage of iPhone users actually read that blog. If you spread that percentage across the US...yeah, not a big impact.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I read the blog the other day , I was curious about whether they switched its writer , since the content seemed so much less intelligent than what was previously there .
I 'm saddened to see that this is still Lyons 's work.The old FSJ was witty , creative and had just enough stupidity to make it funny .
When I read it yesterday , I saw typical blogger shit .
This only strengthens my point.As for this " cause , " it probably wo n't do anything , since only a very small percentage of iPhone users actually read that blog .
If you spread that percentage across the US...yeah , not a big impact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I read the  blog the other day, I was curious about whether they switched its writer, since the content seemed so much less intelligent than what was previously there.
I'm saddened to see that this is still Lyons's work.The old FSJ was witty, creative and had just enough stupidity to make it funny.
When I read it yesterday, I saw typical blogger shit.
This only strengthens my point.As for this "cause," it probably won't do anything, since only a very small percentage of iPhone users actually read that blog.
If you spread that percentage across the US...yeah, not a big impact.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463224</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1259659620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also generally speaking it is a poor country.</p><p>0.20$ a day to you isn't much, but to some jerk in India it might be. Also because of the cheap labor, their infrastructure is much cheaper to build. Perhaps some Indian will do it for 2$ vs 20$ for the US. Same could be said for their support and admin for their networks.</p><p>However I hear your pain. Companies in the US and Canada defiantly gouge their customers. The government that they elect allow them to.</p><p>A better more reasonable example would be Europe, where salaries are just as high, yet somehow they manage to do it without sodomizing their customers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also generally speaking it is a poor country.0.20 $ a day to you is n't much , but to some jerk in India it might be .
Also because of the cheap labor , their infrastructure is much cheaper to build .
Perhaps some Indian will do it for 2 $ vs 20 $ for the US .
Same could be said for their support and admin for their networks.However I hear your pain .
Companies in the US and Canada defiantly gouge their customers .
The government that they elect allow them to.A better more reasonable example would be Europe , where salaries are just as high , yet somehow they manage to do it without sodomizing their customers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also generally speaking it is a poor country.0.20$ a day to you isn't much, but to some jerk in India it might be.
Also because of the cheap labor, their infrastructure is much cheaper to build.
Perhaps some Indian will do it for 2$ vs 20$ for the US.
Same could be said for their support and admin for their networks.However I hear your pain.
Companies in the US and Canada defiantly gouge their customers.
The government that they elect allow them to.A better more reasonable example would be Europe, where salaries are just as high, yet somehow they manage to do it without sodomizing their customers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459654</id>
	<title>Don't Panic</title>
	<author>Gary W. Longsine</author>
	<datestamp>1259690700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>iPhone is very popular because it works really well for stuff like web surfing and whatnot.  The consequence of this intersection is that iPhone is performing a near continual DDoS on the AT*T network every day.  Friday won't be all that special.</htmltext>
<tokenext>iPhone is very popular because it works really well for stuff like web surfing and whatnot .
The consequence of this intersection is that iPhone is performing a near continual DDoS on the AT * T network every day .
Friday wo n't be all that special .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iPhone is very popular because it works really well for stuff like web surfing and whatnot.
The consequence of this intersection is that iPhone is performing a near continual DDoS on the AT*T network every day.
Friday won't be all that special.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459562</id>
	<title>AT&amp;T Hosting</title>
	<author>coulbc</author>
	<datestamp>1259690460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if AT&amp;T does fake steves web hosting?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if AT&amp;T does fake steves web hosting ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if AT&amp;T does fake steves web hosting?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461618</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>cez</author>
	<datestamp>1259697840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The idea is to have <i>many many</i> people use their data plans at the same time... not to have them keep up the usage or do anything particularly wrong our out of line with the TOS.  With a DDOS attack, the premise is to (pardon my old school reference) "ping -f"* a target, here the ATT Network, from many different unique sources.  Wherein 1 person pinging the target is fine and falls under normal operations, 100,000 people pinging the same host at the same time... well not so good, despite the fact that each individual is doing nothing wrong, in unison and as a whole is when you have problems.
<p>
*IRC Wars were fun and edjoomacational... and a ping -f back in the day from an OC3 could alone take out a users dial-up or cable connection causing an effective DOS, no need for these newfangled botted DDOS techniques that are out there today... but eh, <i>get off my lawn!</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The idea is to have many many people use their data plans at the same time... not to have them keep up the usage or do anything particularly wrong our out of line with the TOS .
With a DDOS attack , the premise is to ( pardon my old school reference ) " ping -f " * a target , here the ATT Network , from many different unique sources .
Wherein 1 person pinging the target is fine and falls under normal operations , 100,000 people pinging the same host at the same time... well not so good , despite the fact that each individual is doing nothing wrong , in unison and as a whole is when you have problems .
* IRC Wars were fun and edjoomacational... and a ping -f back in the day from an OC3 could alone take out a users dial-up or cable connection causing an effective DOS , no need for these newfangled botted DDOS techniques that are out there today... but eh , get off my lawn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The idea is to have many many people use their data plans at the same time... not to have them keep up the usage or do anything particularly wrong our out of line with the TOS.
With a DDOS attack, the premise is to (pardon my old school reference) "ping -f"* a target, here the ATT Network, from many different unique sources.
Wherein 1 person pinging the target is fine and falls under normal operations, 100,000 people pinging the same host at the same time... well not so good, despite the fact that each individual is doing nothing wrong, in unison and as a whole is when you have problems.
*IRC Wars were fun and edjoomacational... and a ping -f back in the day from an OC3 could alone take out a users dial-up or cable connection causing an effective DOS, no need for these newfangled botted DDOS techniques that are out there today... but eh, get off my lawn!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30465994</id>
	<title>Re:Fastest way to solve it?</title>
	<author>ktappe</author>
	<datestamp>1259668800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Disconnect those users. The iPhone zealots have nowhere else to go. Telling them to go for the Droid is like telling a crack addict to drop their habit by smoking pot and slurping vodka. Take down a few thousand users, and the majority will quickly stop complaining.</p></div><p>Ok, so how about if the NHTSA decides that you're driving too many miles each year? You're putting too much stress on the highways compared to your fellow drivers. You're costing the Feds too much money and contributing to traffic jams. Let's disconnect you from your car: You're no longer permitted to drive. Telling you to take the train or bus is like telling a crack addict to drop their habit by smoking pot and slurping vodka. Take away the licenses of a few thousand drivers and the rest will quickly stop complaining about traffic jams and potholes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Disconnect those users .
The iPhone zealots have nowhere else to go .
Telling them to go for the Droid is like telling a crack addict to drop their habit by smoking pot and slurping vodka .
Take down a few thousand users , and the majority will quickly stop complaining.Ok , so how about if the NHTSA decides that you 're driving too many miles each year ?
You 're putting too much stress on the highways compared to your fellow drivers .
You 're costing the Feds too much money and contributing to traffic jams .
Let 's disconnect you from your car : You 're no longer permitted to drive .
Telling you to take the train or bus is like telling a crack addict to drop their habit by smoking pot and slurping vodka .
Take away the licenses of a few thousand drivers and the rest will quickly stop complaining about traffic jams and potholes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disconnect those users.
The iPhone zealots have nowhere else to go.
Telling them to go for the Droid is like telling a crack addict to drop their habit by smoking pot and slurping vodka.
Take down a few thousand users, and the majority will quickly stop complaining.Ok, so how about if the NHTSA decides that you're driving too many miles each year?
You're putting too much stress on the highways compared to your fellow drivers.
You're costing the Feds too much money and contributing to traffic jams.
Let's disconnect you from your car: You're no longer permitted to drive.
Telling you to take the train or bus is like telling a crack addict to drop their habit by smoking pot and slurping vodka.
Take away the licenses of a few thousand drivers and the rest will quickly stop complaining about traffic jams and potholes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459598</id>
	<title>AT&amp;T bill</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1259690580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And on Monday, December 22nd, AT&amp;T's billing department, with the full support of legal, bills Dan Lyons for the increase in the cost of data transfer on the backhaul for December 19th.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And on Monday , December 22nd , AT&amp;T 's billing department , with the full support of legal , bills Dan Lyons for the increase in the cost of data transfer on the backhaul for December 19th .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And on Monday, December 22nd, AT&amp;T's billing department, with the full support of legal, bills Dan Lyons for the increase in the cost of data transfer on the backhaul for December 19th.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462040</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>farble1670</author>
	<datestamp>1259699280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>really. make a choice eh?</p><p>1. limit data usage for the top 5\% of users</p><p>2. increase the cost of everyone's data plan so the top 5\% of users can continue use 3g as their broadband connection via illegal tethering </p><p>all providers will face this problem, at least in the short term. at&amp;t is just feeling it first because of the popularity of the iphone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>really .
make a choice eh ? 1 .
limit data usage for the top 5 \ % of users2 .
increase the cost of everyone 's data plan so the top 5 \ % of users can continue use 3g as their broadband connection via illegal tethering all providers will face this problem , at least in the short term .
at&amp;t is just feeling it first because of the popularity of the iphone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>really.
make a choice eh?1.
limit data usage for the top 5\% of users2.
increase the cost of everyone's data plan so the top 5\% of users can continue use 3g as their broadband connection via illegal tethering all providers will face this problem, at least in the short term.
at&amp;t is just feeling it first because of the popularity of the iphone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>jitterman</author>
	<datestamp>1259690520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I actually do have an iPhone, purchased about 6 months ago (and while I like it, it's far from perfect - overall I dislike Apple as a company). Before that, my service was still AT&amp;T using a Motorola handset. They both drop(ped) calls at about the same rate. I'm all for AT&amp;T users demanding that the company provide service for ALL of its customers via a reliable, properly scaled network. If they're willing to sell the hardware that consumes the services, they need to buck up and provide the infrastructure to support those customers.<br> <br>

I really don't care WHICH phone Mr. Asshat Bossman of AT&amp;T thinks is the main cause of his company's illness. Point is, they constantly rate dead last for reliability AND customer service among all national carriers. I can tell you this - ATT doesn't fix their problems in a fair (to the consumer) manner, when my contract is up I'll sell this little bugger to a "fanboi" and get a Droid phone, or even just a fucking regular handset, to get away from these clowns.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually do have an iPhone , purchased about 6 months ago ( and while I like it , it 's far from perfect - overall I dislike Apple as a company ) .
Before that , my service was still AT&amp;T using a Motorola handset .
They both drop ( ped ) calls at about the same rate .
I 'm all for AT&amp;T users demanding that the company provide service for ALL of its customers via a reliable , properly scaled network .
If they 're willing to sell the hardware that consumes the services , they need to buck up and provide the infrastructure to support those customers .
I really do n't care WHICH phone Mr. Asshat Bossman of AT&amp;T thinks is the main cause of his company 's illness .
Point is , they constantly rate dead last for reliability AND customer service among all national carriers .
I can tell you this - ATT does n't fix their problems in a fair ( to the consumer ) manner , when my contract is up I 'll sell this little bugger to a " fanboi " and get a Droid phone , or even just a fucking regular handset , to get away from these clowns .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually do have an iPhone, purchased about 6 months ago (and while I like it, it's far from perfect - overall I dislike Apple as a company).
Before that, my service was still AT&amp;T using a Motorola handset.
They both drop(ped) calls at about the same rate.
I'm all for AT&amp;T users demanding that the company provide service for ALL of its customers via a reliable, properly scaled network.
If they're willing to sell the hardware that consumes the services, they need to buck up and provide the infrastructure to support those customers.
I really don't care WHICH phone Mr. Asshat Bossman of AT&amp;T thinks is the main cause of his company's illness.
Point is, they constantly rate dead last for reliability AND customer service among all national carriers.
I can tell you this - ATT doesn't fix their problems in a fair (to the consumer) manner, when my contract is up I'll sell this little bugger to a "fanboi" and get a Droid phone, or even just a fucking regular handset, to get away from these clowns.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460304</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>Cheeko</author>
	<datestamp>1259692860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I completely agree. I've had the unlimited plan for about 5 years, since my Original Rzr.  I've since been using it with my iPaq and was just about to buy an HP netbook that I could drop my SIM into for data connections.</p><p>I've been an ATT customer for about 12 years, and if they drop the unlimited data I'll just switch to Verizon or Tmobile.  I've been waiting patiently for a 'Droid phone I can use on ATT anyway, this would be the perfect time for me to just get one and switch carriers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I completely agree .
I 've had the unlimited plan for about 5 years , since my Original Rzr .
I 've since been using it with my iPaq and was just about to buy an HP netbook that I could drop my SIM into for data connections.I 've been an ATT customer for about 12 years , and if they drop the unlimited data I 'll just switch to Verizon or Tmobile .
I 've been waiting patiently for a 'Droid phone I can use on ATT anyway , this would be the perfect time for me to just get one and switch carriers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I completely agree.
I've had the unlimited plan for about 5 years, since my Original Rzr.
I've since been using it with my iPaq and was just about to buy an HP netbook that I could drop my SIM into for data connections.I've been an ATT customer for about 12 years, and if they drop the unlimited data I'll just switch to Verizon or Tmobile.
I've been waiting patiently for a 'Droid phone I can use on ATT anyway, this would be the perfect time for me to just get one and switch carriers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459252</id>
	<title>Liability for missed 911 call?</title>
	<author>jestill</author>
	<datestamp>1259689260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If this works and someone can not get through for a 911 call, is fake Steve Jobs going to real jail?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this works and someone can not get through for a 911 call , is fake Steve Jobs going to real jail ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this works and someone can not get through for a 911 call, is fake Steve Jobs going to real jail?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461782</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>benjamindees</author>
	<datestamp>1259698500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's funny that, for your rant, you randomly chose an age that is below the legal work age in most (all?) of the US, then proceeded to harangue this randomly-selected group of iPhone users for being irresponsible because they don't earn enough to pay for iPhone service, because they are <b>legally prevented</b>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's funny that , for your rant , you randomly chose an age that is below the legal work age in most ( all ?
) of the US , then proceeded to harangue this randomly-selected group of iPhone users for being irresponsible because they do n't earn enough to pay for iPhone service , because they are legally prevented .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's funny that, for your rant, you randomly chose an age that is below the legal work age in most (all?
) of the US, then proceeded to harangue this randomly-selected group of iPhone users for being irresponsible because they don't earn enough to pay for iPhone service, because they are legally prevented.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30483178</id>
	<title>broken already</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261066920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AT&amp;T is broken already. My calls in Manhattan fail a lot on the iPhone</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AT&amp;T is broken already .
My calls in Manhattan fail a lot on the iPhone</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AT&amp;T is broken already.
My calls in Manhattan fail a lot on the iPhone</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459688</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>KefabiMe</author>
	<datestamp>1259690820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can confirm that S. Korea and Sweden have better service than us. In fact, my trips out of the US have helped me realize that other countries aren't catching up to our standard of living. Many have already surpassed the US.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can confirm that S. Korea and Sweden have better service than us .
In fact , my trips out of the US have helped me realize that other countries are n't catching up to our standard of living .
Many have already surpassed the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can confirm that S. Korea and Sweden have better service than us.
In fact, my trips out of the US have helped me realize that other countries aren't catching up to our standard of living.
Many have already surpassed the US.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461442</id>
	<title>I may be far off the mark but...</title>
	<author>Alanonfire</author>
	<datestamp>1259697000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I sort of feel that this is problem comes from both the network side and the smart-phone users.  The networks should be built better but also since these phones came out, a lot of people who only used computers for email, facebook, etc, pretty much stopped using computers for that and started using these phones instead.
<br> <br>
I guess a good analogy for this would be a heatwave.  The power  companies are generating so much power, then all of the sudden everyone turns their AC on which starts causing problems with the power grid and causing brown-outs etc.  Then the power company says, "don't use un-necessary power" but people still do.   Kind of like when you see people watering their lawn in a drought.  Because people have this mentality that "i'm paying for it, don't tell me how to use it."  Then what they don't realize is that its effecting everyone else around them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I sort of feel that this is problem comes from both the network side and the smart-phone users .
The networks should be built better but also since these phones came out , a lot of people who only used computers for email , facebook , etc , pretty much stopped using computers for that and started using these phones instead .
I guess a good analogy for this would be a heatwave .
The power companies are generating so much power , then all of the sudden everyone turns their AC on which starts causing problems with the power grid and causing brown-outs etc .
Then the power company says , " do n't use un-necessary power " but people still do .
Kind of like when you see people watering their lawn in a drought .
Because people have this mentality that " i 'm paying for it , do n't tell me how to use it .
" Then what they do n't realize is that its effecting everyone else around them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sort of feel that this is problem comes from both the network side and the smart-phone users.
The networks should be built better but also since these phones came out, a lot of people who only used computers for email, facebook, etc, pretty much stopped using computers for that and started using these phones instead.
I guess a good analogy for this would be a heatwave.
The power  companies are generating so much power, then all of the sudden everyone turns their AC on which starts causing problems with the power grid and causing brown-outs etc.
Then the power company says, "don't use un-necessary power" but people still do.
Kind of like when you see people watering their lawn in a drought.
Because people have this mentality that "i'm paying for it, don't tell me how to use it.
"  Then what they don't realize is that its effecting everyone else around them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460146</id>
	<title>Well, that may explain why</title>
	<author>pgmrdlm</author>
	<datestamp>1259692320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My mobile pandora was sucking area yesterday.  That, or AT&amp;T just sucks anymore.</p><p>And no, I do not use an iPhone(hate iTunes, truely hate it).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My mobile pandora was sucking area yesterday .
That , or AT&amp;T just sucks anymore.And no , I do not use an iPhone ( hate iTunes , truely hate it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My mobile pandora was sucking area yesterday.
That, or AT&amp;T just sucks anymore.And no, I do not use an iPhone(hate iTunes, truely hate it).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30472930</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261063380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For fuck's sake, we are not "lightyears" behind India.  They offer those things to them because they cannot afford what they charge us here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For fuck 's sake , we are not " lightyears " behind India .
They offer those things to them because they can not afford what they charge us here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For fuck's sake, we are not "lightyears" behind India.
They offer those things to them because they cannot afford what they charge us here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459330</id>
	<title>Cutoff sentence</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1259689500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It is unclear if there will be enough support to cause a DDOS...</p></div><p>... or, if they're successful, whether AT&amp;T wireless customers will notice anything has changed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is unclear if there will be enough support to cause a DDOS...... or , if they 're successful , whether AT&amp;T wireless customers will notice anything has changed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is unclear if there will be enough support to cause a DDOS...... or, if they're successful, whether AT&amp;T wireless customers will notice anything has changed.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459604</id>
	<title>Re:Not the best idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259690580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it fails they'll just retroactively renamed it Operation Dickhold</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it fails they 'll just retroactively renamed it Operation Dickhold</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it fails they'll just retroactively renamed it Operation Dickhold</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30478702</id>
	<title>Alternative</title>
	<author>Blackjack Joe</author>
	<datestamp>1261043040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was listening to the Buzz Out Loud podcast yesterday and I feel that had a better idea. Instead of causing a disruption and proving that iPhones are a problem, instead, don't use the AT&amp;T network for an hour. That would get their notice as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was listening to the Buzz Out Loud podcast yesterday and I feel that had a better idea .
Instead of causing a disruption and proving that iPhones are a problem , instead , do n't use the AT&amp;T network for an hour .
That would get their notice as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was listening to the Buzz Out Loud podcast yesterday and I feel that had a better idea.
Instead of causing a disruption and proving that iPhones are a problem, instead, don't use the AT&amp;T network for an hour.
That would get their notice as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460078</id>
	<title>Re:Not the best idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259692080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But but but, what about the babies!!! and cute puppies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But but but , what about the babies ! ! !
and cute puppies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But but but, what about the babies!!!
and cute puppies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460768</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Option</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1259694480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course, AT&amp;T Wireless isn't a monolith, and hasn't actually existed before, I think, 2006?</p><p>Before AT&amp;T Wireless, it was Cingular.  Before that, it was *gasp* AT&amp;T Wireless (ATTWS).</p><p>Before that, mostly regional carriers that got gobbled up, like Cellular One in Maine, I think.  Or was it Maine Cellular, they all blur together.</p><p>Which I remember well.</p><p>So AT&amp;T has had a few years to demonstrate their slavery to the profit motive (proper for a corporation) and moderate disdain for customers (not so proper).  Of course Sprint holds the trophy for putting profit ahead of service, when they canned a bunch of customers because they called too often to complain.  I think that was a brilliant move on their part, BTW, as they ditched people that called more than once a day.  These are dissatified customers, and giving them a get-off-of-Sprint-free card was perfect.  Many didn't want to leave.  They like to complain.  For those, we have<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. which is relatively free.</p><p>It's not so much incompetence, as it is profit-seeking.  Blowing out your network to accomodate massive data use is expensive, and cuts profits.  The balance is difficult to achieve.</p><p>And AT&amp;T should probably work on detecting tethering and enforcing their TOS.  At least they can defend that on legal grounds.  Though they can change the TOS any time, and watch customers bail when they have the get-off-of-AT&amp;T-free card as well.  Good riddance.  Every carrier dreams of having a customer base that demands less service.  Doh.</p><p>Maybe they will flood to TMO.  Wait, iPhones don't do TMO 3G.  Darn.  They will need to stay.  Captives.  Blame Apple.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , AT&amp;T Wireless is n't a monolith , and has n't actually existed before , I think , 2006 ? Before AT&amp;T Wireless , it was Cingular .
Before that , it was * gasp * AT&amp;T Wireless ( ATTWS ) .Before that , mostly regional carriers that got gobbled up , like Cellular One in Maine , I think .
Or was it Maine Cellular , they all blur together.Which I remember well.So AT&amp;T has had a few years to demonstrate their slavery to the profit motive ( proper for a corporation ) and moderate disdain for customers ( not so proper ) .
Of course Sprint holds the trophy for putting profit ahead of service , when they canned a bunch of customers because they called too often to complain .
I think that was a brilliant move on their part , BTW , as they ditched people that called more than once a day .
These are dissatified customers , and giving them a get-off-of-Sprint-free card was perfect .
Many did n't want to leave .
They like to complain .
For those , we have / .
which is relatively free.It 's not so much incompetence , as it is profit-seeking .
Blowing out your network to accomodate massive data use is expensive , and cuts profits .
The balance is difficult to achieve.And AT&amp;T should probably work on detecting tethering and enforcing their TOS .
At least they can defend that on legal grounds .
Though they can change the TOS any time , and watch customers bail when they have the get-off-of-AT&amp;T-free card as well .
Good riddance .
Every carrier dreams of having a customer base that demands less service .
Doh.Maybe they will flood to TMO .
Wait , iPhones do n't do TMO 3G .
Darn. They will need to stay .
Captives. Blame Apple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, AT&amp;T Wireless isn't a monolith, and hasn't actually existed before, I think, 2006?Before AT&amp;T Wireless, it was Cingular.
Before that, it was *gasp* AT&amp;T Wireless (ATTWS).Before that, mostly regional carriers that got gobbled up, like Cellular One in Maine, I think.
Or was it Maine Cellular, they all blur together.Which I remember well.So AT&amp;T has had a few years to demonstrate their slavery to the profit motive (proper for a corporation) and moderate disdain for customers (not so proper).
Of course Sprint holds the trophy for putting profit ahead of service, when they canned a bunch of customers because they called too often to complain.
I think that was a brilliant move on their part, BTW, as they ditched people that called more than once a day.
These are dissatified customers, and giving them a get-off-of-Sprint-free card was perfect.
Many didn't want to leave.
They like to complain.
For those, we have /.
which is relatively free.It's not so much incompetence, as it is profit-seeking.
Blowing out your network to accomodate massive data use is expensive, and cuts profits.
The balance is difficult to achieve.And AT&amp;T should probably work on detecting tethering and enforcing their TOS.
At least they can defend that on legal grounds.
Though they can change the TOS any time, and watch customers bail when they have the get-off-of-AT&amp;T-free card as well.
Good riddance.
Every carrier dreams of having a customer base that demands less service.
Doh.Maybe they will flood to TMO.
Wait, iPhones don't do TMO 3G.
Darn.  They will need to stay.
Captives.  Blame Apple.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463494</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259660460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>more megapixels on a phone camera<br>a flash on a phone camera</p></div><p>Hey! Speak for yourself.</p><p>I, on the other hand, happen to frequently enjoy a nice self-portrait taken with a cell-phone, and it&rsquo;s helpful when the photographers had decent cameras in their phones.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>more megapixels on a phone cameraa flash on a phone cameraHey !
Speak for yourself.I , on the other hand , happen to frequently enjoy a nice self-portrait taken with a cell-phone , and it    s helpful when the photographers had decent cameras in their phones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>more megapixels on a phone cameraa flash on a phone cameraHey!
Speak for yourself.I, on the other hand, happen to frequently enjoy a nice self-portrait taken with a cell-phone, and it’s helpful when the photographers had decent cameras in their phones.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461350</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>Nikker</author>
	<datestamp>1259696640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The kernel multitasks fine its the window manager and the UI that won't allow it.  If you jail break it you can multitask all you want.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The kernel multitasks fine its the window manager and the UI that wo n't allow it .
If you jail break it you can multitask all you want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The kernel multitasks fine its the window manager and the UI that won't allow it.
If you jail break it you can multitask all you want.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466914</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1259673240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To paraphrase: two guys are going to start streaming TV to their smart phones while everybody else attempts to do the same but ends up timing out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To paraphrase : two guys are going to start streaming TV to their smart phones while everybody else attempts to do the same but ends up timing out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To paraphrase: two guys are going to start streaming TV to their smart phones while everybody else attempts to do the same but ends up timing out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463518</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259660520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hope these 14 year olds with iPhones are willing to become martyrs<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... of course, it's the parents that are paying the bill, anyway.  Hell if I've ever known a 14 year old that earned $150 a month.</p></div><p>I find your post to be so damn stereotypical. I'm an "apple douchebag" who happens to be over 14. In fact, I'm 35, have never owned another single apple product in my LIFE and paid $600 for the god damn thing because I waited so damn long for a "good" phone.</p><p>So no, you don't seem to know EVERYTHING... way to smear one demographic with the broadest brush you have, dipshit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope these 14 year olds with iPhones are willing to become martyrs ... of course , it 's the parents that are paying the bill , anyway .
Hell if I 've ever known a 14 year old that earned $ 150 a month.I find your post to be so damn stereotypical .
I 'm an " apple douchebag " who happens to be over 14 .
In fact , I 'm 35 , have never owned another single apple product in my LIFE and paid $ 600 for the god damn thing because I waited so damn long for a " good " phone.So no , you do n't seem to know EVERYTHING... way to smear one demographic with the broadest brush you have , dipshit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope these 14 year olds with iPhones are willing to become martyrs ... of course, it's the parents that are paying the bill, anyway.
Hell if I've ever known a 14 year old that earned $150 a month.I find your post to be so damn stereotypical.
I'm an "apple douchebag" who happens to be over 14.
In fact, I'm 35, have never owned another single apple product in my LIFE and paid $600 for the god damn thing because I waited so damn long for a "good" phone.So no, you don't seem to know EVERYTHING... way to smear one demographic with the broadest brush you have, dipshit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459628</id>
	<title>Re:Fastest way to solve it?</title>
	<author>Algan</author>
	<datestamp>1259690640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And give up at least $80/mo/user? I don't think so. Plus they won't be able to charge ETF, since nothing these users do is against the agreement. Plus the bad publicity they'll get. Nah it'll be like shooting themselves in the foot.</p><p>Besides, the users who are susceptible to pull this prank are the ones that know how to jailbreak/unlock their iphones. They'll go to T-Mobile in an instant. I know I would.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And give up at least $ 80/mo/user ?
I do n't think so .
Plus they wo n't be able to charge ETF , since nothing these users do is against the agreement .
Plus the bad publicity they 'll get .
Nah it 'll be like shooting themselves in the foot.Besides , the users who are susceptible to pull this prank are the ones that know how to jailbreak/unlock their iphones .
They 'll go to T-Mobile in an instant .
I know I would .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And give up at least $80/mo/user?
I don't think so.
Plus they won't be able to charge ETF, since nothing these users do is against the agreement.
Plus the bad publicity they'll get.
Nah it'll be like shooting themselves in the foot.Besides, the users who are susceptible to pull this prank are the ones that know how to jailbreak/unlock their iphones.
They'll go to T-Mobile in an instant.
I know I would.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460836</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259694720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No shit, you and three other guys had the entire cell to yourself, no wonder you got good reception. The problems happen when 10,000 people are trying to use the same cell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No shit , you and three other guys had the entire cell to yourself , no wonder you got good reception .
The problems happen when 10,000 people are trying to use the same cell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No shit, you and three other guys had the entire cell to yourself, no wonder you got good reception.
The problems happen when 10,000 people are trying to use the same cell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463106</id>
	<title>Two</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1259659200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well we have 2.</p><p>1) Bell (Phone/Mobile/DSL) = Evil<br>2) Rogers (Cable/Mobile/Cable) = Evil</p><p>Both have crappy prices and crappy customer service.</p><p>Pick one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well we have 2.1 ) Bell ( Phone/Mobile/DSL ) = Evil2 ) Rogers ( Cable/Mobile/Cable ) = EvilBoth have crappy prices and crappy customer service.Pick one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well we have 2.1) Bell (Phone/Mobile/DSL) = Evil2) Rogers (Cable/Mobile/Cable) = EvilBoth have crappy prices and crappy customer service.Pick one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460358</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>Bengie</author>
	<datestamp>1259693100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WHAT? I can't hear you, you're audio stream is too garbled</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WHAT ?
I ca n't hear you , you 're audio stream is too garbled</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WHAT?
I can't hear you, you're audio stream is too garbled</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463322</id>
	<title>Bollocks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259659920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a very hard time believing that some jackass coordinating some sort of an attack will actually bring down the AT&amp;T network at all. I refuse to believe that given the latest rearchitecture to implement 3G, the system has not been designed to be scalable to a degree that the entire population of the United States could not take it out. What I mean is that I dont care how many phones are using a single tower, some punks using their iPhones will not be able to shut it down.</p><p>I think that AT&amp;T saying that too much data usage was causing dropped calls is also a load of crap.</p><p>As a side note...I love the term "bollocks" because it means absolute horse crap and this post won't be deleted for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a very hard time believing that some jackass coordinating some sort of an attack will actually bring down the AT&amp;T network at all .
I refuse to believe that given the latest rearchitecture to implement 3G , the system has not been designed to be scalable to a degree that the entire population of the United States could not take it out .
What I mean is that I dont care how many phones are using a single tower , some punks using their iPhones will not be able to shut it down.I think that AT&amp;T saying that too much data usage was causing dropped calls is also a load of crap.As a side note...I love the term " bollocks " because it means absolute horse crap and this post wo n't be deleted for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a very hard time believing that some jackass coordinating some sort of an attack will actually bring down the AT&amp;T network at all.
I refuse to believe that given the latest rearchitecture to implement 3G, the system has not been designed to be scalable to a degree that the entire population of the United States could not take it out.
What I mean is that I dont care how many phones are using a single tower, some punks using their iPhones will not be able to shut it down.I think that AT&amp;T saying that too much data usage was causing dropped calls is also a load of crap.As a side note...I love the term "bollocks" because it means absolute horse crap and this post won't be deleted for it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459046</id>
	<title>Don't know which day? Friday or the 19th?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259688540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's an app for that!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's an app for that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's an app for that!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462666</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259701020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It always struck me as extremely strange when americans complain about losing reception in populated areas... I can't remember losing reception on my phone EVER (except underground bunkers / faraday cages) here in Europe, including running around in the woods tens of kilometers away from the nearest road (which itself is in the middle of nowhere).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It always struck me as extremely strange when americans complain about losing reception in populated areas... I ca n't remember losing reception on my phone EVER ( except underground bunkers / faraday cages ) here in Europe , including running around in the woods tens of kilometers away from the nearest road ( which itself is in the middle of nowhere ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It always struck me as extremely strange when americans complain about losing reception in populated areas... I can't remember losing reception on my phone EVER (except underground bunkers / faraday cages) here in Europe, including running around in the woods tens of kilometers away from the nearest road (which itself is in the middle of nowhere).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30465056</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>acklenx</author>
	<datestamp>1259665920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about
<ul>
<li>folders to organize apps
</li><li>the ability to see what apps I've previously paid for (and deleted from my phone because I ran out of room) before I have to click to buy them again (and risk having picked the wrong app for which I will then be charged).
</li><li>The ability to put files (pdf, doc, etc) in one place that other apps can also access instead of each app having to download it from the internet itself
</li><li>The ability to turn off ALL sound before the app/video starts to play.
</li><li>The ability to record a call (they don't have to build it, just allow that app on the store).
</li><li>how about NOT putting the main speaker under the left side of the phone where I'm likely to block it when I'm holding the phone in my right hand
</li><li>
how about filtering in the app store (I'll say it again - indicating previously purchased apps would be huge... before you purchase them)
</li><li>How about actually downloading that visual voicemail message so I don't have to be "connected" to listen to it</li></ul><p>

Nothing terribly difficult there.  And there are a bunch of things that Apple could make better that they wouldn't even have to do themselves
</p><ul>
<li>A better music/podcast interface (pocket tunes anyone? - apple only allows the radio only version)</li><li>How about Google Voice
</li><li>How about moving contacts from one list to another on the phone
</li><li>How about moving photos from one list to another on the phone
</li></ul><p>
It's not that the phone can't do the things people want (it can - just jailbreak it), it's that apple doesn't want the phone to do things people want.

All that said the iPhone is awesome.  It is a platform for greatness and therefor it is great.  It is only diminished in so much as Apple restricts the apps that can run on it.  What's wrong with google voice?  Do you really think ANYONE will mistake it for the built in phone app after begging and pleading simply to get an invite?  Really?  Even when their phone rings every time they make an outbound call?  Really?
<br>
<br>
I loved my treo and the apps on my treo (and I had hundreds), but the iphone blows it away with the sheer number and quality of apps (with a few notable exceptions - no astronomy program approaches the quality of astromist (at any price), and I still keep my treo around just so I can play ackwire)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about folders to organize apps the ability to see what apps I 've previously paid for ( and deleted from my phone because I ran out of room ) before I have to click to buy them again ( and risk having picked the wrong app for which I will then be charged ) .
The ability to put files ( pdf , doc , etc ) in one place that other apps can also access instead of each app having to download it from the internet itself The ability to turn off ALL sound before the app/video starts to play .
The ability to record a call ( they do n't have to build it , just allow that app on the store ) .
how about NOT putting the main speaker under the left side of the phone where I 'm likely to block it when I 'm holding the phone in my right hand how about filtering in the app store ( I 'll say it again - indicating previously purchased apps would be huge... before you purchase them ) How about actually downloading that visual voicemail message so I do n't have to be " connected " to listen to it Nothing terribly difficult there .
And there are a bunch of things that Apple could make better that they would n't even have to do themselves A better music/podcast interface ( pocket tunes anyone ?
- apple only allows the radio only version ) How about Google Voice How about moving contacts from one list to another on the phone How about moving photos from one list to another on the phone It 's not that the phone ca n't do the things people want ( it can - just jailbreak it ) , it 's that apple does n't want the phone to do things people want .
All that said the iPhone is awesome .
It is a platform for greatness and therefor it is great .
It is only diminished in so much as Apple restricts the apps that can run on it .
What 's wrong with google voice ?
Do you really think ANYONE will mistake it for the built in phone app after begging and pleading simply to get an invite ?
Really ? Even when their phone rings every time they make an outbound call ?
Really ? I loved my treo and the apps on my treo ( and I had hundreds ) , but the iphone blows it away with the sheer number and quality of apps ( with a few notable exceptions - no astronomy program approaches the quality of astromist ( at any price ) , and I still keep my treo around just so I can play ackwire )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about

folders to organize apps
the ability to see what apps I've previously paid for (and deleted from my phone because I ran out of room) before I have to click to buy them again (and risk having picked the wrong app for which I will then be charged).
The ability to put files (pdf, doc, etc) in one place that other apps can also access instead of each app having to download it from the internet itself
The ability to turn off ALL sound before the app/video starts to play.
The ability to record a call (they don't have to build it, just allow that app on the store).
how about NOT putting the main speaker under the left side of the phone where I'm likely to block it when I'm holding the phone in my right hand

how about filtering in the app store (I'll say it again - indicating previously purchased apps would be huge... before you purchase them)
How about actually downloading that visual voicemail message so I don't have to be "connected" to listen to it

Nothing terribly difficult there.
And there are a bunch of things that Apple could make better that they wouldn't even have to do themselves

A better music/podcast interface (pocket tunes anyone?
- apple only allows the radio only version)How about Google Voice
How about moving contacts from one list to another on the phone
How about moving photos from one list to another on the phone

It's not that the phone can't do the things people want (it can - just jailbreak it), it's that apple doesn't want the phone to do things people want.
All that said the iPhone is awesome.
It is a platform for greatness and therefor it is great.
It is only diminished in so much as Apple restricts the apps that can run on it.
What's wrong with google voice?
Do you really think ANYONE will mistake it for the built in phone app after begging and pleading simply to get an invite?
Really?  Even when their phone rings every time they make an outbound call?
Really?


I loved my treo and the apps on my treo (and I had hundreds), but the iphone blows it away with the sheer number and quality of apps (with a few notable exceptions - no astronomy program approaches the quality of astromist (at any price), and I still keep my treo around just so I can play ackwire)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460490</id>
	<title>. . .and the issues are?</title>
	<author>mosb1000</author>
	<datestamp>1259693580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"the iPhone's issues are glaringly bad. It's a decent device that does its job well"<br><br>First of all, these two statements are completely incompatible.  Second, what are the iPhone's glaringly bad issues?  I've had an iPhone for over a year.  I haven't had any issues with it, not to mention any "glaringly bad" ones.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" the iPhone 's issues are glaringly bad .
It 's a decent device that does its job well " First of all , these two statements are completely incompatible .
Second , what are the iPhone 's glaringly bad issues ?
I 've had an iPhone for over a year .
I have n't had any issues with it , not to mention any " glaringly bad " ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"the iPhone's issues are glaringly bad.
It's a decent device that does its job well"First of all, these two statements are completely incompatible.
Second, what are the iPhone's glaringly bad issues?
I've had an iPhone for over a year.
I haven't had any issues with it, not to mention any "glaringly bad" ones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459042</id>
	<title>This is what you get</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259688540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When you just have to have the shiny toy that locks you in to a single network.</p><p>Might be time to look at a smartphone that works on competing networks without having to "jailbreak" them.  Namely ALL the other ones.</p><p>(love it -- my captcha is "wireless")</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When you just have to have the shiny toy that locks you in to a single network.Might be time to look at a smartphone that works on competing networks without having to " jailbreak " them .
Namely ALL the other ones .
( love it -- my captcha is " wireless " )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you just have to have the shiny toy that locks you in to a single network.Might be time to look at a smartphone that works on competing networks without having to "jailbreak" them.
Namely ALL the other ones.
(love it -- my captcha is "wireless")</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461314</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>jgtg32a</author>
	<datestamp>1259696460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I didn't see anywhere that Jailbreaking was against the ToS, I only saw tethering.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't see anywhere that Jailbreaking was against the ToS , I only saw tethering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't see anywhere that Jailbreaking was against the ToS, I only saw tethering.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460432</id>
	<title>Nice Work</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259693340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... Dumbshit</p><p>You've given AT&amp;T the perfect time to have a "network outage" to "prove" their point.</p><p>The fact that the iPhone had nothing to do with it doesn't mean they won't turn off the network for a few minutes to make it seem like it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... DumbshitYou 've given AT&amp;T the perfect time to have a " network outage " to " prove " their point.The fact that the iPhone had nothing to do with it does n't mean they wo n't turn off the network for a few minutes to make it seem like it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... DumbshitYou've given AT&amp;T the perfect time to have a "network outage" to "prove" their point.The fact that the iPhone had nothing to do with it doesn't mean they won't turn off the network for a few minutes to make it seem like it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30471942</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1261054440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They both drop(ped) calls at about the same rate.</p></div><p>Could you please explain to a confused European what dropped calls look like?  Is it (from both ends) as if the other party hung up?</p><p>(I hope I'm not coming off as smug about our w&oslash;nderful teleph&oslash;ne system; I'm just curious.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They both drop ( ped ) calls at about the same rate.Could you please explain to a confused European what dropped calls look like ?
Is it ( from both ends ) as if the other party hung up ?
( I hope I 'm not coming off as smug about our w   nderful teleph   ne system ; I 'm just curious .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They both drop(ped) calls at about the same rate.Could you please explain to a confused European what dropped calls look like?
Is it (from both ends) as if the other party hung up?
(I hope I'm not coming off as smug about our wønderful telephøne system; I'm just curious.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066</id>
	<title>some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>alen</author>
	<datestamp>1259688600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i have an iphone 3gs and i max out at 2GB per month if i stream pandora almost all day for a month. the 3\% AT&amp;T is talking about use 20GB or more and reading some forums people brag how they did it by jailbreaking and tethering or using some banned apps.</p><p>the unlimited data plan is if you follow the TOS. jailbreaking and tethering is against the TOS so expect almost everyone not to care when AT&amp;T implements a 5GB or 10GB max data per month and charges you a lot of money for anything above that. my wife uses less than 100MB per month on her iphone and most people are less than 500MB per month</p><p>the only people the new charges will hurt are a small minority who aren't playing by the contract anyway</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i have an iphone 3gs and i max out at 2GB per month if i stream pandora almost all day for a month .
the 3 \ % AT&amp;T is talking about use 20GB or more and reading some forums people brag how they did it by jailbreaking and tethering or using some banned apps.the unlimited data plan is if you follow the TOS .
jailbreaking and tethering is against the TOS so expect almost everyone not to care when AT&amp;T implements a 5GB or 10GB max data per month and charges you a lot of money for anything above that .
my wife uses less than 100MB per month on her iphone and most people are less than 500MB per monththe only people the new charges will hurt are a small minority who are n't playing by the contract anyway</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i have an iphone 3gs and i max out at 2GB per month if i stream pandora almost all day for a month.
the 3\% AT&amp;T is talking about use 20GB or more and reading some forums people brag how they did it by jailbreaking and tethering or using some banned apps.the unlimited data plan is if you follow the TOS.
jailbreaking and tethering is against the TOS so expect almost everyone not to care when AT&amp;T implements a 5GB or 10GB max data per month and charges you a lot of money for anything above that.
my wife uses less than 100MB per month on her iphone and most people are less than 500MB per monththe only people the new charges will hurt are a small minority who aren't playing by the contract anyway</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459692</id>
	<title>continued charging after closing account</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259690880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AT&amp;T will also charge you for an extra month of internet usage when you close your account. Of course it doesn't show up on the bill as such and they'll avoid answering where the charge came from.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AT&amp;T will also charge you for an extra month of internet usage when you close your account .
Of course it does n't show up on the bill as such and they 'll avoid answering where the charge came from .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AT&amp;T will also charge you for an extra month of internet usage when you close your account.
Of course it doesn't show up on the bill as such and they'll avoid answering where the charge came from.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463432</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>Itchyeyes</author>
	<datestamp>1259660340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So, the retaliation against the AT&amp;T CEO saying that iPhone users use too much data<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... is for iPhone users to use too much data?  How is that going to ensure that the unlimited pricing stays in affect?</p></div><p>The point is not to prove that iPhone users don't use a lot of data, the point is to call attention to the fact that AT&amp;T is nowhere near capable of providing the service that they are advertising and selling.  It's entirely disingenuous for AT&amp;T to use "unlimited data" in their advertising as a lure to attract new customers, then turn around and play the victim when their customers actually choose to use the service that both parties willingly signed on for.</p><p>AT&amp;T wants the extra revenue that comes with these unlimited data plans and the customers that come with high-profile smart phones, like the iPhone, but they don't want the operating expenses that come with actually supporting these services.  They don't get to have it both ways.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the retaliation against the AT&amp;T CEO saying that iPhone users use too much data ... is for iPhone users to use too much data ?
How is that going to ensure that the unlimited pricing stays in affect ? The point is not to prove that iPhone users do n't use a lot of data , the point is to call attention to the fact that AT&amp;T is nowhere near capable of providing the service that they are advertising and selling .
It 's entirely disingenuous for AT&amp;T to use " unlimited data " in their advertising as a lure to attract new customers , then turn around and play the victim when their customers actually choose to use the service that both parties willingly signed on for.AT&amp;T wants the extra revenue that comes with these unlimited data plans and the customers that come with high-profile smart phones , like the iPhone , but they do n't want the operating expenses that come with actually supporting these services .
They do n't get to have it both ways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the retaliation against the AT&amp;T CEO saying that iPhone users use too much data ... is for iPhone users to use too much data?
How is that going to ensure that the unlimited pricing stays in affect?The point is not to prove that iPhone users don't use a lot of data, the point is to call attention to the fact that AT&amp;T is nowhere near capable of providing the service that they are advertising and selling.
It's entirely disingenuous for AT&amp;T to use "unlimited data" in their advertising as a lure to attract new customers, then turn around and play the victim when their customers actually choose to use the service that both parties willingly signed on for.AT&amp;T wants the extra revenue that comes with these unlimited data plans and the customers that come with high-profile smart phones, like the iPhone, but they don't want the operating expenses that come with actually supporting these services.
They don't get to have it both ways.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459156</id>
	<title>iPhone idiots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259688960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope it "suceeds."</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope it " suceeds .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope it "suceeds.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462184</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>iron-kurton</author>
	<datestamp>1259699700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow sounds exactly like my story.  In fact, I still own my Motorola Q with a different number. The dropped calls are exactly the same (I'm on the phone every day on my two-hour-long commute, and sometimes switch phones, but the service drops at exactly the same spots on the freeway).</p><p>The exception is that the Motorola Q will randomly decide to reset itself, for no apparent reason (but we can blame that on Windows Mobile).</p><p>However, I would like to note that even though I have data plans on both phones, it feels like I use the data plan on the iPhone a heckuva lot more than on the Q.  Partly because of AppStore/ITMS, and partly because browsing the internets on the iPhone doesn't make me want to gouge my eyes out and throw the phone against the wall.  I have no hard evidence (i.e usage numbers), but I can tell you whenever I need to look something up on the internet, drive to a destination, download music, or anything internet related, I reach for the iPhone first.</p><p>In a sense, it's the iPhone's fault for all the alleged data usage, because it makes access to the internet easy and intuitive.  If increased data usage causes more fees for the iPhone (and less eventual iPhone users), it would be truly ironic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow sounds exactly like my story .
In fact , I still own my Motorola Q with a different number .
The dropped calls are exactly the same ( I 'm on the phone every day on my two-hour-long commute , and sometimes switch phones , but the service drops at exactly the same spots on the freeway ) .The exception is that the Motorola Q will randomly decide to reset itself , for no apparent reason ( but we can blame that on Windows Mobile ) .However , I would like to note that even though I have data plans on both phones , it feels like I use the data plan on the iPhone a heckuva lot more than on the Q. Partly because of AppStore/ITMS , and partly because browsing the internets on the iPhone does n't make me want to gouge my eyes out and throw the phone against the wall .
I have no hard evidence ( i.e usage numbers ) , but I can tell you whenever I need to look something up on the internet , drive to a destination , download music , or anything internet related , I reach for the iPhone first.In a sense , it 's the iPhone 's fault for all the alleged data usage , because it makes access to the internet easy and intuitive .
If increased data usage causes more fees for the iPhone ( and less eventual iPhone users ) , it would be truly ironic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow sounds exactly like my story.
In fact, I still own my Motorola Q with a different number.
The dropped calls are exactly the same (I'm on the phone every day on my two-hour-long commute, and sometimes switch phones, but the service drops at exactly the same spots on the freeway).The exception is that the Motorola Q will randomly decide to reset itself, for no apparent reason (but we can blame that on Windows Mobile).However, I would like to note that even though I have data plans on both phones, it feels like I use the data plan on the iPhone a heckuva lot more than on the Q.  Partly because of AppStore/ITMS, and partly because browsing the internets on the iPhone doesn't make me want to gouge my eyes out and throw the phone against the wall.
I have no hard evidence (i.e usage numbers), but I can tell you whenever I need to look something up on the internet, drive to a destination, download music, or anything internet related, I reach for the iPhone first.In a sense, it's the iPhone's fault for all the alleged data usage, because it makes access to the internet easy and intuitive.
If increased data usage causes more fees for the iPhone (and less eventual iPhone users), it would be truly ironic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459646</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1259690700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So I can go ahead and expect to stop receiving e-mails on my BlackBerry on Friday? Great, yeah, sweet. Thanks guys!</p></div><p>I don't see what the weekly blackberry fuckups have to do with this story, other than the fact that you happen to know in advance when your blackberry will fuck up this time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So I can go ahead and expect to stop receiving e-mails on my BlackBerry on Friday ?
Great , yeah , sweet .
Thanks guys ! I do n't see what the weekly blackberry fuckups have to do with this story , other than the fact that you happen to know in advance when your blackberry will fuck up this time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I can go ahead and expect to stop receiving e-mails on my BlackBerry on Friday?
Great, yeah, sweet.
Thanks guys!I don't see what the weekly blackberry fuckups have to do with this story, other than the fact that you happen to know in advance when your blackberry will fuck up this time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30499348</id>
	<title>If you want get your service fixed, call them.</title>
	<author>aristotle-dude</author>
	<datestamp>1261246920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems that most American consumers are bashing their heads against the wall for no good reason because they have not been educated on how to properly handle customer service issues with services in high school. A basic economics class that teaches you how to deal with businesses effectively should be a required class in high school curriculum.<p>
Rule 1. Never go to the store you bought your phone from unless the phone is actually defective. They cannot help you with reception problems caused by network configuration or a lack of towers. You are wasting their time and your own.
</p><p>
Rule 2. Call the right person. Do not call and complain to customer service for half an hour. You are not going to get any results and you are again wasting time. Get transferred to someone who can reset your cell settings on their end.
</p><p>
I had a problem of not being able to call on my 3GS when at on in 3G mode despite having full bars and when I turned off 2G, i fell into GPRS instead of Edge.  I called my carrier (Fido in Canada) and went through their menu until I got to a real person. I explained my situation to her and she asked me to turn 3G back on and turn off my iPhone while she reset things on the network end. Then I was instructed to turn the iPhone back on, go into settings, General, Reset and select "Reset Network Settings". This caused the phone to give a progress bar, then reboot on its own. That solved my problem. I had to enter my WiFi key again to join my home network but other than that, nothing was lost.
</p><p>
Seriously folks, give this a try. Try pretending that you are a polite Canadian rather that a "proud" American with a sense of entitlement when talking to AT&amp;T staff on the phone and you will be blown away by the service you get. The golden rule of the bible will open doors while arrogance will cause them to close on you swiftly. CSRs are there to help you but they are not to blame for your problems with cellular reception and store employees are there to help you with hardware, they cannot help you with your service efficiently.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems that most American consumers are bashing their heads against the wall for no good reason because they have not been educated on how to properly handle customer service issues with services in high school .
A basic economics class that teaches you how to deal with businesses effectively should be a required class in high school curriculum .
Rule 1 .
Never go to the store you bought your phone from unless the phone is actually defective .
They can not help you with reception problems caused by network configuration or a lack of towers .
You are wasting their time and your own .
Rule 2 .
Call the right person .
Do not call and complain to customer service for half an hour .
You are not going to get any results and you are again wasting time .
Get transferred to someone who can reset your cell settings on their end .
I had a problem of not being able to call on my 3GS when at on in 3G mode despite having full bars and when I turned off 2G , i fell into GPRS instead of Edge .
I called my carrier ( Fido in Canada ) and went through their menu until I got to a real person .
I explained my situation to her and she asked me to turn 3G back on and turn off my iPhone while she reset things on the network end .
Then I was instructed to turn the iPhone back on , go into settings , General , Reset and select " Reset Network Settings " .
This caused the phone to give a progress bar , then reboot on its own .
That solved my problem .
I had to enter my WiFi key again to join my home network but other than that , nothing was lost .
Seriously folks , give this a try .
Try pretending that you are a polite Canadian rather that a " proud " American with a sense of entitlement when talking to AT&amp;T staff on the phone and you will be blown away by the service you get .
The golden rule of the bible will open doors while arrogance will cause them to close on you swiftly .
CSRs are there to help you but they are not to blame for your problems with cellular reception and store employees are there to help you with hardware , they can not help you with your service efficiently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems that most American consumers are bashing their heads against the wall for no good reason because they have not been educated on how to properly handle customer service issues with services in high school.
A basic economics class that teaches you how to deal with businesses effectively should be a required class in high school curriculum.
Rule 1.
Never go to the store you bought your phone from unless the phone is actually defective.
They cannot help you with reception problems caused by network configuration or a lack of towers.
You are wasting their time and your own.
Rule 2.
Call the right person.
Do not call and complain to customer service for half an hour.
You are not going to get any results and you are again wasting time.
Get transferred to someone who can reset your cell settings on their end.
I had a problem of not being able to call on my 3GS when at on in 3G mode despite having full bars and when I turned off 2G, i fell into GPRS instead of Edge.
I called my carrier (Fido in Canada) and went through their menu until I got to a real person.
I explained my situation to her and she asked me to turn 3G back on and turn off my iPhone while she reset things on the network end.
Then I was instructed to turn the iPhone back on, go into settings, General, Reset and select "Reset Network Settings".
This caused the phone to give a progress bar, then reboot on its own.
That solved my problem.
I had to enter my WiFi key again to join my home network but other than that, nothing was lost.
Seriously folks, give this a try.
Try pretending that you are a polite Canadian rather that a "proud" American with a sense of entitlement when talking to AT&amp;T staff on the phone and you will be blown away by the service you get.
The golden rule of the bible will open doors while arrogance will cause them to close on you swiftly.
CSRs are there to help you but they are not to blame for your problems with cellular reception and store employees are there to help you with hardware, they cannot help you with your service efficiently.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460160</id>
	<title>isn't here</title>
	<author>jsnipy</author>
	<datestamp>1259692320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't there an app for that?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't there an app for that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't there an app for that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>0100010001010011</author>
	<datestamp>1259689200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just got back from a trip to India. In terms of mobiles, the US is lightyears behind them.</p><p>I went out to Sikkim for the first week, closer in geography to Colorado than NYC (or the rest of India). I don't think I ever lost cell reception once. We're talking about an area that is about as densely populated as farm towns in the Midwest. I was standing on top of a mountain and could get 4 networks. 4. Vodaphone, Airtel, Aircel and some other local one. I got better reception at the top of the mountain that I can get at my own house in a subdivision (I don't live in the sticks).</p><p>Not only that EVERYONE had a cell phone. Some of the monks, every farm we were on, etc. Everything was prepaid and the SIM cards 'never' expired (They had an expiration sometime in 2025). Meaning I could add $1-2 and it would never expire. Compare that to the US where if I want to get the cheap $10 prepaid plan I have 30 days to use that before it expires. Calls were around $.01/minute anywhere.</p><p>Then they had the 'data' plans. Stuff for $10-20 a month with unlimited 3G. I had an 'unlimited' GPRS plan that cost me $0.20 a day. Not only that I could turn it on and off at will. Going to not need it: *567#, going to use it: *567#. No locked in plans, no monthly fees, nothing.</p><p>It's depressing coming back to the US and realize how much we're getting screwed by the phone companies compared to else where.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just got back from a trip to India .
In terms of mobiles , the US is lightyears behind them.I went out to Sikkim for the first week , closer in geography to Colorado than NYC ( or the rest of India ) .
I do n't think I ever lost cell reception once .
We 're talking about an area that is about as densely populated as farm towns in the Midwest .
I was standing on top of a mountain and could get 4 networks .
4. Vodaphone , Airtel , Aircel and some other local one .
I got better reception at the top of the mountain that I can get at my own house in a subdivision ( I do n't live in the sticks ) .Not only that EVERYONE had a cell phone .
Some of the monks , every farm we were on , etc .
Everything was prepaid and the SIM cards 'never ' expired ( They had an expiration sometime in 2025 ) .
Meaning I could add $ 1-2 and it would never expire .
Compare that to the US where if I want to get the cheap $ 10 prepaid plan I have 30 days to use that before it expires .
Calls were around $ .01/minute anywhere.Then they had the 'data ' plans .
Stuff for $ 10-20 a month with unlimited 3G .
I had an 'unlimited ' GPRS plan that cost me $ 0.20 a day .
Not only that I could turn it on and off at will .
Going to not need it : * 567 # , going to use it : * 567 # .
No locked in plans , no monthly fees , nothing.It 's depressing coming back to the US and realize how much we 're getting screwed by the phone companies compared to else where .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just got back from a trip to India.
In terms of mobiles, the US is lightyears behind them.I went out to Sikkim for the first week, closer in geography to Colorado than NYC (or the rest of India).
I don't think I ever lost cell reception once.
We're talking about an area that is about as densely populated as farm towns in the Midwest.
I was standing on top of a mountain and could get 4 networks.
4. Vodaphone, Airtel, Aircel and some other local one.
I got better reception at the top of the mountain that I can get at my own house in a subdivision (I don't live in the sticks).Not only that EVERYONE had a cell phone.
Some of the monks, every farm we were on, etc.
Everything was prepaid and the SIM cards 'never' expired (They had an expiration sometime in 2025).
Meaning I could add $1-2 and it would never expire.
Compare that to the US where if I want to get the cheap $10 prepaid plan I have 30 days to use that before it expires.
Calls were around $.01/minute anywhere.Then they had the 'data' plans.
Stuff for $10-20 a month with unlimited 3G.
I had an 'unlimited' GPRS plan that cost me $0.20 a day.
Not only that I could turn it on and off at will.
Going to not need it: *567#, going to use it: *567#.
No locked in plans, no monthly fees, nothing.It's depressing coming back to the US and realize how much we're getting screwed by the phone companies compared to else where.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461000</id>
	<title>Re:How mature.</title>
	<author>Blastercorps</author>
	<datestamp>1259695440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have it backwards. They're going to do their darndest to hog as much bandwidth as possible, and then point out that AT&amp;T's network was just as shitty as the day before and the day after. This is to disprove that "greedy inconsiderate iPhone users" are bringing AT&amp;T, when AT&amp;T is doing that just fine on their own.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have it backwards .
They 're going to do their darndest to hog as much bandwidth as possible , and then point out that AT&amp;T 's network was just as shitty as the day before and the day after .
This is to disprove that " greedy inconsiderate iPhone users " are bringing AT&amp;T , when AT&amp;T is doing that just fine on their own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have it backwards.
They're going to do their darndest to hog as much bandwidth as possible, and then point out that AT&amp;T's network was just as shitty as the day before and the day after.
This is to disprove that "greedy inconsiderate iPhone users" are bringing AT&amp;T, when AT&amp;T is doing that just fine on their own.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459176</id>
	<title>Way to prove AT&amp;T's point</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259689080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AT&amp;T is claiming iPhone/etc users are using too much network bandwidth, so unlimited bandwidth plans need to end.</p><p>In response, iPhone/etc users will crash AT&amp;T's network by using too much bandwidth.</p><p>Yeah, that'll work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AT&amp;T is claiming iPhone/etc users are using too much network bandwidth , so unlimited bandwidth plans need to end.In response , iPhone/etc users will crash AT&amp;T 's network by using too much bandwidth.Yeah , that 'll work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AT&amp;T is claiming iPhone/etc users are using too much network bandwidth, so unlimited bandwidth plans need to end.In response, iPhone/etc users will crash AT&amp;T's network by using too much bandwidth.Yeah, that'll work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459474</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>Amouth</author>
	<datestamp>1259690160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>exactly - if they want a 5gb a month plan - then sell it as a 5gb a month plan not unlimited.</p><p>unlimited means without limit - a limit is a restriction - a cap is a restriction and there for a limit.</p><p>I really wish i had the resources to take them to court for fraud/false advertising/deceptive practices.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>exactly - if they want a 5gb a month plan - then sell it as a 5gb a month plan not unlimited.unlimited means without limit - a limit is a restriction - a cap is a restriction and there for a limit.I really wish i had the resources to take them to court for fraud/false advertising/deceptive practices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>exactly - if they want a 5gb a month plan - then sell it as a 5gb a month plan not unlimited.unlimited means without limit - a limit is a restriction - a cap is a restriction and there for a limit.I really wish i had the resources to take them to court for fraud/false advertising/deceptive practices.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460170</id>
	<title>Price is higher then the quality of service</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259692380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>where does it say he wants to get rid of the unlimited data plan? Hes saying that we arent getting what we pay for.</p><p>These companies should be able to keep up their infrastructure to keep us up to date with the world. They are making alot of money and their network needs work. Yet they are neglecting the customers and keeping us happy with a crippled network.</p><p>If the network goes down on friday from a protest,  imagine if another disaster strike the nation. We will hear busy tones all day.</p><p>The price we pay doesnt match the quality of the service. We pay alot of money for tightly worded contracts that give outline what we can and can not do on our personal devices.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>where does it say he wants to get rid of the unlimited data plan ?
Hes saying that we arent getting what we pay for.These companies should be able to keep up their infrastructure to keep us up to date with the world .
They are making alot of money and their network needs work .
Yet they are neglecting the customers and keeping us happy with a crippled network.If the network goes down on friday from a protest , imagine if another disaster strike the nation .
We will hear busy tones all day.The price we pay doesnt match the quality of the service .
We pay alot of money for tightly worded contracts that give outline what we can and can not do on our personal devices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>where does it say he wants to get rid of the unlimited data plan?
Hes saying that we arent getting what we pay for.These companies should be able to keep up their infrastructure to keep us up to date with the world.
They are making alot of money and their network needs work.
Yet they are neglecting the customers and keeping us happy with a crippled network.If the network goes down on friday from a protest,  imagine if another disaster strike the nation.
We will hear busy tones all day.The price we pay doesnt match the quality of the service.
We pay alot of money for tightly worded contracts that give outline what we can and can not do on our personal devices.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460180</id>
	<title>AT&amp;T is one of the big reasons....</title>
	<author>dentar</author>
	<datestamp>1259692380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...that I have no desire to purchase an iPhone.</p><p>Oh.. and it's way overpriced.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...that I have no desire to purchase an iPhone.Oh.. and it 's way overpriced .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that I have no desire to purchase an iPhone.Oh.. and it's way overpriced.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460046</id>
	<title>Legality?</title>
	<author>thedbp</author>
	<datestamp>1259691900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it legal to publicly co-ordinate a DDOS attack on a major US telecom?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it legal to publicly co-ordinate a DDOS attack on a major US telecom ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it legal to publicly co-ordinate a DDOS attack on a major US telecom?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461010</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cambodia is the same way, the cell phone service is so much better there that I was flat-out embarrassed. In Cambodia you can buy *any* brand of phone from *any* store, insert your SIM card and bingo, you're on the air. That's right- you can use any phone on any network from any carrier. You can buy minutes very, very cheaply, recharge them whenever you want, and switch numbers just by buying another SIM card. The numbers only cost a few dollars, and they and your minutes never expire.  Thailand and Vietnam are the same way.</p><p>My wife (who's Cambodian) was astounded that one brand of phone wouldn't "just work" on any network here, and how incredibly complicated it was to change numbers, switch phones, etc etc. Yes, we put a man on the Moon, but f*ck if we can do something crazy like use a Sprint phone on an AT&amp;T network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cambodia is the same way , the cell phone service is so much better there that I was flat-out embarrassed .
In Cambodia you can buy * any * brand of phone from * any * store , insert your SIM card and bingo , you 're on the air .
That 's right- you can use any phone on any network from any carrier .
You can buy minutes very , very cheaply , recharge them whenever you want , and switch numbers just by buying another SIM card .
The numbers only cost a few dollars , and they and your minutes never expire .
Thailand and Vietnam are the same way.My wife ( who 's Cambodian ) was astounded that one brand of phone would n't " just work " on any network here , and how incredibly complicated it was to change numbers , switch phones , etc etc .
Yes , we put a man on the Moon , but f * ck if we can do something crazy like use a Sprint phone on an AT&amp;T network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cambodia is the same way, the cell phone service is so much better there that I was flat-out embarrassed.
In Cambodia you can buy *any* brand of phone from *any* store, insert your SIM card and bingo, you're on the air.
That's right- you can use any phone on any network from any carrier.
You can buy minutes very, very cheaply, recharge them whenever you want, and switch numbers just by buying another SIM card.
The numbers only cost a few dollars, and they and your minutes never expire.
Thailand and Vietnam are the same way.My wife (who's Cambodian) was astounded that one brand of phone wouldn't "just work" on any network here, and how incredibly complicated it was to change numbers, switch phones, etc etc.
Yes, we put a man on the Moon, but f*ck if we can do something crazy like use a Sprint phone on an AT&amp;T network.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461500</id>
	<title>Re:I read this as</title>
	<author>Tyr\_7BE</author>
	<datestamp>1259697360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More than a day of battery life?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More than a day of battery life ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More than a day of battery life?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463388</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259660160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;<i>I agree, and yet I don't. Unlimited means unlimited, it doesn't mean "Within reason."</i></p><p>And yet, in the most lawsuit happy country in the world, nobody has really tried suing any carrier over the word "unlimited".  Either the lawyers have decided they don't want the money or your opinion (and the opinion of the slashbots who modded you up) is brain dead.  Hmmm, which one could it be?</p><p>Oh, BTW, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puffery.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I agree , and yet I do n't .
Unlimited means unlimited , it does n't mean " Within reason .
" And yet , in the most lawsuit happy country in the world , nobody has really tried suing any carrier over the word " unlimited " .
Either the lawyers have decided they do n't want the money or your opinion ( and the opinion of the slashbots who modded you up ) is brain dead .
Hmmm , which one could it be ? Oh , BTW , http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puffery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;I agree, and yet I don't.
Unlimited means unlimited, it doesn't mean "Within reason.
"And yet, in the most lawsuit happy country in the world, nobody has really tried suing any carrier over the word "unlimited".
Either the lawyers have decided they don't want the money or your opinion (and the opinion of the slashbots who modded you up) is brain dead.
Hmmm, which one could it be?Oh, BTW, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puffery.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459402</id>
	<title>Re:Not the best idea</title>
	<author>Brian Stretch</author>
	<datestamp>1259689800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How could anyone really think this is a good idea? AT&amp;T has effectively admitted that the data usage growth for smartphones is above the rate that their data network will be able to grow. Using more data intensive applications will only show them how correct they are ("Look how much data will be used in the future when more people are streaming data")</p><p>In addition, what if this actually interferes with an emergency call?</p><p>Sorry that this might not be anti-corporate enough, but Operation Chokehold really isn't a great idea.</p></div><p>What are you, a Communist?  That's the same excuse we used to hear every time Reagan wanted to put pressure on the Soviets.  Bring on the YouTube vids of Apple's 1984 ad on OC day!  Bring the Evil Empire to its knees!</p><p>Umm, except that crushing AT&amp;T's network would make iPhone's a wee bit useless... frack.</p><p>(satire, for the humor impaired...)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How could anyone really think this is a good idea ?
AT&amp;T has effectively admitted that the data usage growth for smartphones is above the rate that their data network will be able to grow .
Using more data intensive applications will only show them how correct they are ( " Look how much data will be used in the future when more people are streaming data " ) In addition , what if this actually interferes with an emergency call ? Sorry that this might not be anti-corporate enough , but Operation Chokehold really is n't a great idea.What are you , a Communist ?
That 's the same excuse we used to hear every time Reagan wanted to put pressure on the Soviets .
Bring on the YouTube vids of Apple 's 1984 ad on OC day !
Bring the Evil Empire to its knees ! Umm , except that crushing AT&amp;T 's network would make iPhone 's a wee bit useless.. .
frack. ( satire , for the humor impaired... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How could anyone really think this is a good idea?
AT&amp;T has effectively admitted that the data usage growth for smartphones is above the rate that their data network will be able to grow.
Using more data intensive applications will only show them how correct they are ("Look how much data will be used in the future when more people are streaming data")In addition, what if this actually interferes with an emergency call?Sorry that this might not be anti-corporate enough, but Operation Chokehold really isn't a great idea.What are you, a Communist?
That's the same excuse we used to hear every time Reagan wanted to put pressure on the Soviets.
Bring on the YouTube vids of Apple's 1984 ad on OC day!
Bring the Evil Empire to its knees!Umm, except that crushing AT&amp;T's network would make iPhone's a wee bit useless...
frack.(satire, for the humor impaired...)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459484</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1259690160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly.  This smacks of someone getting very very angry and lashing out without giving any thought to what he's trying to accomplish, and how to achieve them.   Sometimes an uncivil riot gets results.  This isn't one of them.  Stupid tactics, stupid strategy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
This smacks of someone getting very very angry and lashing out without giving any thought to what he 's trying to accomplish , and how to achieve them .
Sometimes an uncivil riot gets results .
This is n't one of them .
Stupid tactics , stupid strategy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
This smacks of someone getting very very angry and lashing out without giving any thought to what he's trying to accomplish, and how to achieve them.
Sometimes an uncivil riot gets results.
This isn't one of them.
Stupid tactics, stupid strategy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460124</id>
	<title>Re:Should be</title>
	<author>davester666</author>
	<datestamp>1259692200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forget, since AT&amp;T cell network is considered critical infrastructure, everybody using their cell phones during this hour will automatically be declared domestic terrorists for trying to disrupt it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forget , since AT&amp;T cell network is considered critical infrastructure , everybody using their cell phones during this hour will automatically be declared domestic terrorists for trying to disrupt it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forget, since AT&amp;T cell network is considered critical infrastructure, everybody using their cell phones during this hour will automatically be declared domestic terrorists for trying to disrupt it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30464704</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Option</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks for that, and thank the moderators for considering incite-ful and insightful to be homologues.<br>My father worked for AT&amp;T for 30 years in many of its previous incarnations, and while i will agree that "gross incompetence" has been there all along, I have no idea why you want to "kill AT&amp;T - screw the shareholders."  The company has for decades used stock options in lieu of monetary bonuses, and many employees and ex-employees have been waiting nervously for over a decade for those contracts to be worth something. In 1999 we cashed out a portion and put me through college; my brother is due to go next year and we're glad that some AT&amp;T stock is worth close to its 90's bubble price. If you or any reader here has money in a mutual fund or 401k at your employer, you can bet you have a personal investment in big T.<br>The problem is a lack of regulation, as has often been a problem with AT&amp;T through the years. As long as you continue to pay your bill to AT&amp;T, no amount of complaint will get their attention.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for that , and thank the moderators for considering incite-ful and insightful to be homologues.My father worked for AT&amp;T for 30 years in many of its previous incarnations , and while i will agree that " gross incompetence " has been there all along , I have no idea why you want to " kill AT&amp;T - screw the shareholders .
" The company has for decades used stock options in lieu of monetary bonuses , and many employees and ex-employees have been waiting nervously for over a decade for those contracts to be worth something .
In 1999 we cashed out a portion and put me through college ; my brother is due to go next year and we 're glad that some AT&amp;T stock is worth close to its 90 's bubble price .
If you or any reader here has money in a mutual fund or 401k at your employer , you can bet you have a personal investment in big T.The problem is a lack of regulation , as has often been a problem with AT&amp;T through the years .
As long as you continue to pay your bill to AT&amp;T , no amount of complaint will get their attention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for that, and thank the moderators for considering incite-ful and insightful to be homologues.My father worked for AT&amp;T for 30 years in many of its previous incarnations, and while i will agree that "gross incompetence" has been there all along, I have no idea why you want to "kill AT&amp;T - screw the shareholders.
"  The company has for decades used stock options in lieu of monetary bonuses, and many employees and ex-employees have been waiting nervously for over a decade for those contracts to be worth something.
In 1999 we cashed out a portion and put me through college; my brother is due to go next year and we're glad that some AT&amp;T stock is worth close to its 90's bubble price.
If you or any reader here has money in a mutual fund or 401k at your employer, you can bet you have a personal investment in big T.The problem is a lack of regulation, as has often been a problem with AT&amp;T through the years.
As long as you continue to pay your bill to AT&amp;T, no amount of complaint will get their attention.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30475614</id>
	<title>Re:Clogging the bandwidth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261074720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That's because in terms of landlines, India is light years behind the US.</p></div><p>How do you explain the mobile network and handset penetration in countries like Finland and Sweden then, which didn't exactly live in the stone ages with regards to landlines? (Please do note that they have an average population density lower than that of much of the US but they manage to have practically 100\% geographic coverage.)</p><p>Just admit it. You're being royally screwed over.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's because in terms of landlines , India is light years behind the US.How do you explain the mobile network and handset penetration in countries like Finland and Sweden then , which did n't exactly live in the stone ages with regards to landlines ?
( Please do note that they have an average population density lower than that of much of the US but they manage to have practically 100 \ % geographic coverage .
) Just admit it .
You 're being royally screwed over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's because in terms of landlines, India is light years behind the US.How do you explain the mobile network and handset penetration in countries like Finland and Sweden then, which didn't exactly live in the stone ages with regards to landlines?
(Please do note that they have an average population density lower than that of much of the US but they manage to have practically 100\% geographic coverage.
)Just admit it.
You're being royally screwed over.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462078</id>
	<title>Re:some of the usage is ridiculous</title>
	<author>Sandbags</author>
	<datestamp>1259699400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don;t know...  I hardly use Pandora (usually only on wifi anyway), and I might watch 20 minutes total of YouTube videos in 30 days.</p><p>I send/receive a ton of e-mail, and web surf quite a bit, including reading PDFs (tech manuals mostly for products I'm deploying or supporting), I'm also a heavy maps user.</p><p>I reset my data counter every billing cycle.  I'm sitting at 3.1GB right now.  Looking through my history, I've had 4 months this year well over 5GB.</p><p>I don't tether.<br>I don't do much video over the air (20 min a month?)<br>I rarely do audio over the air (a few hours a month?)<br>I don't twitter<br>I don't play any games with online connections</p><p>I exceed their cap regularly....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I don ; t know... I hardly use Pandora ( usually only on wifi anyway ) , and I might watch 20 minutes total of YouTube videos in 30 days.I send/receive a ton of e-mail , and web surf quite a bit , including reading PDFs ( tech manuals mostly for products I 'm deploying or supporting ) , I 'm also a heavy maps user.I reset my data counter every billing cycle .
I 'm sitting at 3.1GB right now .
Looking through my history , I 've had 4 months this year well over 5GB.I do n't tether.I do n't do much video over the air ( 20 min a month ?
) I rarely do audio over the air ( a few hours a month ?
) I do n't twitterI do n't play any games with online connectionsI exceed their cap regularly... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don;t know...  I hardly use Pandora (usually only on wifi anyway), and I might watch 20 minutes total of YouTube videos in 30 days.I send/receive a ton of e-mail, and web surf quite a bit, including reading PDFs (tech manuals mostly for products I'm deploying or supporting), I'm also a heavy maps user.I reset my data counter every billing cycle.
I'm sitting at 3.1GB right now.
Looking through my history, I've had 4 months this year well over 5GB.I don't tether.I don't do much video over the air (20 min a month?
)I rarely do audio over the air (a few hours a month?
)I don't twitterI don't play any games with online connectionsI exceed their cap regularly....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30464704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_126</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_131</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30479746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30469296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30464010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_135</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30465688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30473268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30475614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30472574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_129</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_132</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_128</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30472930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30549152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30465056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30470286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30469796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30474000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30464898
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30465886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_127</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_130</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30465994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_133</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30464504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30471942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30477026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30464224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461512
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_134</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_16_1611246_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459560
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30474000
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460424
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461512
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460954
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460598
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459754
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461714
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459384
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459654
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462264
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468514
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459396
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459306
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459474
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460310
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460632
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460618
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462870
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463388
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459290
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461124
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460358
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30469796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460998
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30465994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459628
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30465688
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30464704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460146
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459220
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462462
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460836
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460272
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459548
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459688
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460562
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459570
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30464224
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30475614
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466078
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459934
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463224
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460540
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460744
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461010
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30472930
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462666
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461182
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30477026
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459880
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459748
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30464010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459236
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30468190
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459610
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462696
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459316
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459180
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460000
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460858
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461350
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461500
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30465056
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463494
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463028
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460490
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459572
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461854
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30473268
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466516
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30464898
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30471942
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30465886
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462466
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460770
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459440
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462040
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461008
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460220
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463432
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461618
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461782
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461684
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463518
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460304
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463068
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30464504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30479746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30470286
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459466
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30472574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459612
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459176
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30458944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459386
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460166
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460106
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30463106
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460496
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459552
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30461462
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460024
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460340
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466282
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459284
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459764
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30466914
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30469296
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459448
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30462238
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30549152
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30460124
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459666
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459484
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459672
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459422
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_16_1611246.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_16_1611246.30459758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
