<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_14_0014223</id>
	<title>French Military Contributes To Thunderbird 3</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1260800880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>fredboboss sends news about Mozilla's email client Thunderbird 3, whose release we <a href="//tech.slashdot.org/story/09/12/08/211240/Mozilla-Thunderbird-3-Released">noted last week</a>. <i>"Thunderbird 3 <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2356958,00.asp">contains code from the French military</a>, which decided the open source product was more secure than Microsoft's rival Outlook. The French government is beginning to move to other open source software, including Linux instead of Windows and OpenOffice instead of Microsoft Office. Thunderbird 3 used some of the code from <a href="http://www.trustedbird.org/tb/Main\_Page">TrustedBird</a>, a generalized and co-branded version of Thunderbird with security extensions built by the French military."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>fredboboss sends news about Mozilla 's email client Thunderbird 3 , whose release we noted last week .
" Thunderbird 3 contains code from the French military , which decided the open source product was more secure than Microsoft 's rival Outlook .
The French government is beginning to move to other open source software , including Linux instead of Windows and OpenOffice instead of Microsoft Office .
Thunderbird 3 used some of the code from TrustedBird , a generalized and co-branded version of Thunderbird with security extensions built by the French military .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fredboboss sends news about Mozilla's email client Thunderbird 3, whose release we noted last week.
"Thunderbird 3 contains code from the French military, which decided the open source product was more secure than Microsoft's rival Outlook.
The French government is beginning to move to other open source software, including Linux instead of Windows and OpenOffice instead of Microsoft Office.
Thunderbird 3 used some of the code from TrustedBird, a generalized and co-branded version of Thunderbird with security extensions built by the French military.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429808</id>
	<title>Fought brave? During Phoney War?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260797520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, i live in Poland, and we do remember French and Brits who "fought brave" while Poland was dying.</p><p>source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoney\_War</p><p>The Phoney War, also called the Twilight War by Winston Churchill, der Sitzkrieg in German ("the sitting war": a play on the word Blitzkrieg),[1] the Bore War (a play on the Boer War), the Polish dziwna wojna ("strange war"), and the French dr&#244;le de guerre ("funny war" or "joke war") was a phase in early World War II &ndash; in the months following the German invasion of Poland in September 1939 and preceding the Battle of France in May 1940 &ndash; that was marked by a lack of major military operations in Continental Europe. The great powers of Europe had declared war on one another, yet neither side had committed to launching a significant attack, and there was relatively little fighting on the ground, notwithstanding terms of Anglo-Polish military alliance and Franco-Polish Military Alliance, which obliged the United Kingdom and France to assist Poland.</p><p>While most of the German army was engaged in Poland, a much smaller German force manned the Siegfried Line, their fortified defensive line along the French border. At the Maginot Line on the other side of the border, British and French troops stood facing them, but there were only some local, minor skirmishes. The British Royal Air Force dropped propaganda leaflets on Germany and the first Canadian troops stepped ashore in Britain, while western Europe was in a strange calm for seven months.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , i live in Poland , and we do remember French and Brits who " fought brave " while Poland was dying.source : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoney \ _WarThe Phoney War , also called the Twilight War by Winston Churchill , der Sitzkrieg in German ( " the sitting war " : a play on the word Blitzkrieg ) , [ 1 ] the Bore War ( a play on the Boer War ) , the Polish dziwna wojna ( " strange war " ) , and the French dr   le de guerre ( " funny war " or " joke war " ) was a phase in early World War II    in the months following the German invasion of Poland in September 1939 and preceding the Battle of France in May 1940    that was marked by a lack of major military operations in Continental Europe .
The great powers of Europe had declared war on one another , yet neither side had committed to launching a significant attack , and there was relatively little fighting on the ground , notwithstanding terms of Anglo-Polish military alliance and Franco-Polish Military Alliance , which obliged the United Kingdom and France to assist Poland.While most of the German army was engaged in Poland , a much smaller German force manned the Siegfried Line , their fortified defensive line along the French border .
At the Maginot Line on the other side of the border , British and French troops stood facing them , but there were only some local , minor skirmishes .
The British Royal Air Force dropped propaganda leaflets on Germany and the first Canadian troops stepped ashore in Britain , while western Europe was in a strange calm for seven months .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, i live in Poland, and we do remember French and Brits who "fought brave" while Poland was dying.source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoney\_WarThe Phoney War, also called the Twilight War by Winston Churchill, der Sitzkrieg in German ("the sitting war": a play on the word Blitzkrieg),[1] the Bore War (a play on the Boer War), the Polish dziwna wojna ("strange war"), and the French drôle de guerre ("funny war" or "joke war") was a phase in early World War II – in the months following the German invasion of Poland in September 1939 and preceding the Battle of France in May 1940 – that was marked by a lack of major military operations in Continental Europe.
The great powers of Europe had declared war on one another, yet neither side had committed to launching a significant attack, and there was relatively little fighting on the ground, notwithstanding terms of Anglo-Polish military alliance and Franco-Polish Military Alliance, which obliged the United Kingdom and France to assist Poland.While most of the German army was engaged in Poland, a much smaller German force manned the Siegfried Line, their fortified defensive line along the French border.
At the Maginot Line on the other side of the border, British and French troops stood facing them, but there were only some local, minor skirmishes.
The British Royal Air Force dropped propaganda leaflets on Germany and the first Canadian troops stepped ashore in Britain, while western Europe was in a strange calm for seven months.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428046</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>gbarules2999</author>
	<datestamp>1260726360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm proud to be an American.</p></div><p>I'm proud to live in that dot over here. My friend wishes he had been born on the dot on the other side of the map, though. If only.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm proud to be an American.I 'm proud to live in that dot over here .
My friend wishes he had been born on the dot on the other side of the map , though .
If only .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm proud to be an American.I'm proud to live in that dot over here.
My friend wishes he had been born on the dot on the other side of the map, though.
If only.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427496</id>
	<title>Thunderbird 3 is the spacegoing one isn't it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260720060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's good to see the French contributing to International Rescue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's good to see the French contributing to International Rescue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's good to see the French contributing to International Rescue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429164</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1260786960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>USA wouldn't know anything about fighting such a war where you risk losing your country.</p> </div><p>Oh come, now.  We had that experience too once.</p><p>It was the early 1860s if I recall correctly....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>USA would n't know anything about fighting such a war where you risk losing your country .
Oh come , now .
We had that experience too once.It was the early 1860s if I recall correctly... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>USA wouldn't know anything about fighting such a war where you risk losing your country.
Oh come, now.
We had that experience too once.It was the early 1860s if I recall correctly....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260733500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is a bit strong for Americans to accuse the French of being cowards considering that USA never gets involved in a war that you don't are completely and massively military superior in. France fought brave and well in WW2 but still lost. USA wouldn't know anything about fighting such a war where you risk losing your country. I guess you know that since you keep repeating that lame meme about France. It was old years ago and now it is just embarrassing so watch.</p><p>/Not French</p><p>&lt;/RantMode&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a bit strong for Americans to accuse the French of being cowards considering that USA never gets involved in a war that you do n't are completely and massively military superior in .
France fought brave and well in WW2 but still lost .
USA would n't know anything about fighting such a war where you risk losing your country .
I guess you know that since you keep repeating that lame meme about France .
It was old years ago and now it is just embarrassing so watch./Not French</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a bit strong for Americans to accuse the French of being cowards considering that USA never gets involved in a war that you don't are completely and massively military superior in.
France fought brave and well in WW2 but still lost.
USA wouldn't know anything about fighting such a war where you risk losing your country.
I guess you know that since you keep repeating that lame meme about France.
It was old years ago and now it is just embarrassing so watch./Not French</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30431042</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260806400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; How many forevers have died in battle and are burred on american fighting for america.</p><p>How many world wars have we fought in america?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; How many forevers have died in battle and are burred on american fighting for america.How many world wars have we fought in america ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; How many forevers have died in battle and are burred on american fighting for america.How many world wars have we fought in america?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428102</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260727020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An English speakers teasing the French is just a impulse reaction hardcoded into the DNA of our language. Look at how many miserable and oppressive words we have borrowed from them. This meme has been evolving since at least 1066, hopefully all parties dont take it too seriously all of the time and enjoy it for what it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An English speakers teasing the French is just a impulse reaction hardcoded into the DNA of our language .
Look at how many miserable and oppressive words we have borrowed from them .
This meme has been evolving since at least 1066 , hopefully all parties dont take it too seriously all of the time and enjoy it for what it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An English speakers teasing the French is just a impulse reaction hardcoded into the DNA of our language.
Look at how many miserable and oppressive words we have borrowed from them.
This meme has been evolving since at least 1066, hopefully all parties dont take it too seriously all of the time and enjoy it for what it is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30431706</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260809400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Vietnam... Nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Vietnam... Nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vietnam... Nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30434636</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Roman Coder</author>
	<datestamp>1260823860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had always thought the "Hate the French" attitude started way back when Reagan wanted to fly some B1 Bombers over their territory, and they said no.</p><p>Regardless of the politics, I would say that France is a friend to the U.S., not an enemy, and deserves better from us than the jokes we say at their expense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had always thought the " Hate the French " attitude started way back when Reagan wanted to fly some B1 Bombers over their territory , and they said no.Regardless of the politics , I would say that France is a friend to the U.S. , not an enemy , and deserves better from us than the jokes we say at their expense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had always thought the "Hate the French" attitude started way back when Reagan wanted to fly some B1 Bombers over their territory, and they said no.Regardless of the politics, I would say that France is a friend to the U.S., not an enemy, and deserves better from us than the jokes we say at their expense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429140</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260786600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow... really? A whole thread of bashing the French? Are you really that pathetic?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow... really ? A whole thread of bashing the French ?
Are you really that pathetic ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow... really? A whole thread of bashing the French?
Are you really that pathetic?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427876</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260724260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please, do NOT lump all of us Americans in the same group of smacktards who order "freedom fries" at the McDonalds in Wal-Mart while chugging Cokes the size of aquariums and riding around on the powered carts.</p><p>There are a lot of us who know about WWII, the French resistance who did a large part in getting the Germans out of their nation by supplying critical intel and paying for it with their lives.</p><p>There are also people who know about the fact that if it wasn't for the French, the US would be either a much smaller nation (Louisiana Purchase, anyone), or would not even exist as a nation in the first place, but remain as a British colony.</p><p>Oh, and presently, France is the only European nation that isn't taking the easy way out, surrendering their infrastructure to the former Soviet Union and basing their whole electric grid on Russian natural gas.  People may sneer at French nuclear power, but they are energy independent and not having to throw bodies of their citizens to protect pipelines or war-torn areas of the world to keep the lights on and the cars moving.</p><p>It would be nice to take Americans through France.  I'd love to take them not just through Paris, but through Normandy, and other areas of the country so the image of all France being full of bad mimes gets dumped on the ashbin of history.</p><p>Conversely, I'd also like to take Europeans through Texas so they don't think this state is full of drunk rednecks who cast roving eyes on nearby farm animals when their cousin isn't available.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , do NOT lump all of us Americans in the same group of smacktards who order " freedom fries " at the McDonalds in Wal-Mart while chugging Cokes the size of aquariums and riding around on the powered carts.There are a lot of us who know about WWII , the French resistance who did a large part in getting the Germans out of their nation by supplying critical intel and paying for it with their lives.There are also people who know about the fact that if it was n't for the French , the US would be either a much smaller nation ( Louisiana Purchase , anyone ) , or would not even exist as a nation in the first place , but remain as a British colony.Oh , and presently , France is the only European nation that is n't taking the easy way out , surrendering their infrastructure to the former Soviet Union and basing their whole electric grid on Russian natural gas .
People may sneer at French nuclear power , but they are energy independent and not having to throw bodies of their citizens to protect pipelines or war-torn areas of the world to keep the lights on and the cars moving.It would be nice to take Americans through France .
I 'd love to take them not just through Paris , but through Normandy , and other areas of the country so the image of all France being full of bad mimes gets dumped on the ashbin of history.Conversely , I 'd also like to take Europeans through Texas so they do n't think this state is full of drunk rednecks who cast roving eyes on nearby farm animals when their cousin is n't available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, do NOT lump all of us Americans in the same group of smacktards who order "freedom fries" at the McDonalds in Wal-Mart while chugging Cokes the size of aquariums and riding around on the powered carts.There are a lot of us who know about WWII, the French resistance who did a large part in getting the Germans out of their nation by supplying critical intel and paying for it with their lives.There are also people who know about the fact that if it wasn't for the French, the US would be either a much smaller nation (Louisiana Purchase, anyone), or would not even exist as a nation in the first place, but remain as a British colony.Oh, and presently, France is the only European nation that isn't taking the easy way out, surrendering their infrastructure to the former Soviet Union and basing their whole electric grid on Russian natural gas.
People may sneer at French nuclear power, but they are energy independent and not having to throw bodies of their citizens to protect pipelines or war-torn areas of the world to keep the lights on and the cars moving.It would be nice to take Americans through France.
I'd love to take them not just through Paris, but through Normandy, and other areas of the country so the image of all France being full of bad mimes gets dumped on the ashbin of history.Conversely, I'd also like to take Europeans through Texas so they don't think this state is full of drunk rednecks who cast roving eyes on nearby farm animals when their cousin isn't available.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428540</id>
	<title>Re:Naaaah</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1260733680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Such a moral indignation while calling the Viet Kong "a bunch of midget in black pajamas".  *P
</p><p>
My bet?  You're a redneck Aussie.  Keep yo head down and maybe we'll keep the Chinese in check away from you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Such a moral indignation while calling the Viet Kong " a bunch of midget in black pajamas " .
* P My bet ?
You 're a redneck Aussie .
Keep yo head down and maybe we 'll keep the Chinese in check away from you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Such a moral indignation while calling the Viet Kong "a bunch of midget in black pajamas".
*P

My bet?
You're a redneck Aussie.
Keep yo head down and maybe we'll keep the Chinese in check away from you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430310</id>
	<title>Re:Watch patriotic American geeks heads explode</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260802260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As an American geek I feel ashamed by it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As an American geek I feel ashamed by it .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an American geek I feel ashamed by it.
:(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30431294</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Super\_Z</author>
	<datestamp>1260807780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> In fact, it wasn't until France was attacked 8 months later that they even started fighting.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
In fact, besides the Saar offensive, France sent soldiers to Narvik where they fought alongside Norwegian, Polish and British forces.</p><blockquote><div><p>Hell, France lasted a little over two weeks longer than Poland and it did not have the soviet union to deal
with (and had eight months of knowing that Germany was on the military move.)</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
You also seem to forget that the Dutch, British and Belgian armies were crushed alongside the French. The Germans won every campaign they fought at the time. Pretty much the only thing that stopped these guys were overextended supply lines.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact , it was n't until France was attacked 8 months later that they even started fighting .
In fact , besides the Saar offensive , France sent soldiers to Narvik where they fought alongside Norwegian , Polish and British forces.Hell , France lasted a little over two weeks longer than Poland and it did not have the soviet union to deal with ( and had eight months of knowing that Germany was on the military move .
) You also seem to forget that the Dutch , British and Belgian armies were crushed alongside the French .
The Germans won every campaign they fought at the time .
Pretty much the only thing that stopped these guys were overextended supply lines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> In fact, it wasn't until France was attacked 8 months later that they even started fighting.
In fact, besides the Saar offensive, France sent soldiers to Narvik where they fought alongside Norwegian, Polish and British forces.Hell, France lasted a little over two weeks longer than Poland and it did not have the soviet union to deal
with (and had eight months of knowing that Germany was on the military move.
)

You also seem to forget that the Dutch, British and Belgian armies were crushed alongside the French.
The Germans won every campaign they fought at the time.
Pretty much the only thing that stopped these guys were overextended supply lines.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427778</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>fandingo</author>
	<datestamp>1260723180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm tired of the rest of the world trying to tell US citizens what to believe. If you are so pissed off at us, then do something about it.</p><p>I think the US is the best country in the world, no exception. I don't give a shit in the least what anyone else thinks of that. I'm proud to be an American.</p><p>During the Napoleonic Era, France had the best armies in continental Europe; England dominated the seas. From the Wikipedia entry on the Battle of Trafalgar, "The British victory spectacularly confirmed the naval supremacy that Britain had established during the past century..."</p><p>I absolutely agree that the French surrender thing is stupid and juvenile. It needs to go away. There's some "The French always surrender," then we get comments like yours that are like "but the French saved you in the Revolutionary War" and so on. I'm sick of the whole damn thing.</p><p>I suppose you mean the War of 1812 when you mention the US losing to Canada. That's a retarded conclusion to make. First, we were primarily fighting Britain because of trade tensions because the British restricted trade to, of all countries, France. The war ended because both sides finally realized that there was no point in fighting.<br>A lot of people think that Vietnam was a huge "defeat." I'm not going to say that it wasn't, but we did accomplish some goals. Communist Vietnam never became a strong force in Asia, and didn't spread. We effectively contained Communism there. There were two goals in the Cold War: 1) don't allow Communism anywhere, and 2) if #1 fails, then contain it. We absolutely failed at #1, but #2 worked well. People will probably respond that we shouldn't have done anything to stop Communism; I agree that we probably should have stayed out, but the countries where we did stop Communism are markedly better off now, in particular North vs. South Korea.<br>You seem to be confused that all assholes are ignorant. I'm perfectly fine with being an asshole sometimes, especially when someone criticizes something of which I am proud.</p><p>I think that you are an ignorant, America-hating asshole that seems to be so pissed off because the US makes the rules for world. There are a lot of groups/countries that have hated the US over the years, none of them have done particularly well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm tired of the rest of the world trying to tell US citizens what to believe .
If you are so pissed off at us , then do something about it.I think the US is the best country in the world , no exception .
I do n't give a shit in the least what anyone else thinks of that .
I 'm proud to be an American.During the Napoleonic Era , France had the best armies in continental Europe ; England dominated the seas .
From the Wikipedia entry on the Battle of Trafalgar , " The British victory spectacularly confirmed the naval supremacy that Britain had established during the past century... " I absolutely agree that the French surrender thing is stupid and juvenile .
It needs to go away .
There 's some " The French always surrender , " then we get comments like yours that are like " but the French saved you in the Revolutionary War " and so on .
I 'm sick of the whole damn thing.I suppose you mean the War of 1812 when you mention the US losing to Canada .
That 's a retarded conclusion to make .
First , we were primarily fighting Britain because of trade tensions because the British restricted trade to , of all countries , France .
The war ended because both sides finally realized that there was no point in fighting.A lot of people think that Vietnam was a huge " defeat .
" I 'm not going to say that it was n't , but we did accomplish some goals .
Communist Vietnam never became a strong force in Asia , and did n't spread .
We effectively contained Communism there .
There were two goals in the Cold War : 1 ) do n't allow Communism anywhere , and 2 ) if # 1 fails , then contain it .
We absolutely failed at # 1 , but # 2 worked well .
People will probably respond that we should n't have done anything to stop Communism ; I agree that we probably should have stayed out , but the countries where we did stop Communism are markedly better off now , in particular North vs. South Korea.You seem to be confused that all assholes are ignorant .
I 'm perfectly fine with being an asshole sometimes , especially when someone criticizes something of which I am proud.I think that you are an ignorant , America-hating asshole that seems to be so pissed off because the US makes the rules for world .
There are a lot of groups/countries that have hated the US over the years , none of them have done particularly well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm tired of the rest of the world trying to tell US citizens what to believe.
If you are so pissed off at us, then do something about it.I think the US is the best country in the world, no exception.
I don't give a shit in the least what anyone else thinks of that.
I'm proud to be an American.During the Napoleonic Era, France had the best armies in continental Europe; England dominated the seas.
From the Wikipedia entry on the Battle of Trafalgar, "The British victory spectacularly confirmed the naval supremacy that Britain had established during the past century..."I absolutely agree that the French surrender thing is stupid and juvenile.
It needs to go away.
There's some "The French always surrender," then we get comments like yours that are like "but the French saved you in the Revolutionary War" and so on.
I'm sick of the whole damn thing.I suppose you mean the War of 1812 when you mention the US losing to Canada.
That's a retarded conclusion to make.
First, we were primarily fighting Britain because of trade tensions because the British restricted trade to, of all countries, France.
The war ended because both sides finally realized that there was no point in fighting.A lot of people think that Vietnam was a huge "defeat.
" I'm not going to say that it wasn't, but we did accomplish some goals.
Communist Vietnam never became a strong force in Asia, and didn't spread.
We effectively contained Communism there.
There were two goals in the Cold War: 1) don't allow Communism anywhere, and 2) if #1 fails, then contain it.
We absolutely failed at #1, but #2 worked well.
People will probably respond that we shouldn't have done anything to stop Communism; I agree that we probably should have stayed out, but the countries where we did stop Communism are markedly better off now, in particular North vs. South Korea.You seem to be confused that all assholes are ignorant.
I'm perfectly fine with being an asshole sometimes, especially when someone criticizes something of which I am proud.I think that you are an ignorant, America-hating asshole that seems to be so pissed off because the US makes the rules for world.
There are a lot of groups/countries that have hated the US over the years, none of them have done particularly well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429076</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260785400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>France fought brave and well in WW2 but still lost.</p></div><p>No, France had very powerful military and opportunity to win but they failed to take initiative while German was invading Poland. Later on, they just crapped their pants, especially Gamelin.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>France fought brave and well in WW2 but still lost.No , France had very powerful military and opportunity to win but they failed to take initiative while German was invading Poland .
Later on , they just crapped their pants , especially Gamelin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>France fought brave and well in WW2 but still lost.No, France had very powerful military and opportunity to win but they failed to take initiative while German was invading Poland.
Later on, they just crapped their pants, especially Gamelin.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428432</id>
	<title>Re:French thunderbirds rock</title>
	<author>richlv</author>
	<datestamp>1260731700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i extracted thunderbird 3 recently and discovered that 4 of the plugins i use don't have compatible versions with the 3. i use some 5 or so plugins, so that's quite significant to me.</p><p>this is a huge problem with plugin architecture - while it provides lots of functionality and extreme flexibility, it also is limiting when some great plugin is abandoned, or, as in this case, plugins don't keep the pace with main releases - which essentially was the reason i chose opera instead of firefox - plugins i was extremely interested in were not compatible with new stable versions of the browser for months or more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i extracted thunderbird 3 recently and discovered that 4 of the plugins i use do n't have compatible versions with the 3. i use some 5 or so plugins , so that 's quite significant to me.this is a huge problem with plugin architecture - while it provides lots of functionality and extreme flexibility , it also is limiting when some great plugin is abandoned , or , as in this case , plugins do n't keep the pace with main releases - which essentially was the reason i chose opera instead of firefox - plugins i was extremely interested in were not compatible with new stable versions of the browser for months or more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i extracted thunderbird 3 recently and discovered that 4 of the plugins i use don't have compatible versions with the 3. i use some 5 or so plugins, so that's quite significant to me.this is a huge problem with plugin architecture - while it provides lots of functionality and extreme flexibility, it also is limiting when some great plugin is abandoned, or, as in this case, plugins don't keep the pace with main releases - which essentially was the reason i chose opera instead of firefox - plugins i was extremely interested in were not compatible with new stable versions of the browser for months or more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428278</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>digitalchinky</author>
	<datestamp>1260729300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe you need to get a passport big fella, have a travel through the world. Might do to reign in those angry neophyte ideas of yours and keep them to yourself until you reach your teen years though, particularly so while actually traveling. I'm glad you love your country, sometimes it's cool to be a groupie, me, I am not so patriotic, I confine my amorous nature to the entire universe - it's all good. Just a pity I have to have a passport to see some of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you need to get a passport big fella , have a travel through the world .
Might do to reign in those angry neophyte ideas of yours and keep them to yourself until you reach your teen years though , particularly so while actually traveling .
I 'm glad you love your country , sometimes it 's cool to be a groupie , me , I am not so patriotic , I confine my amorous nature to the entire universe - it 's all good .
Just a pity I have to have a passport to see some of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you need to get a passport big fella, have a travel through the world.
Might do to reign in those angry neophyte ideas of yours and keep them to yourself until you reach your teen years though, particularly so while actually traveling.
I'm glad you love your country, sometimes it's cool to be a groupie, me, I am not so patriotic, I confine my amorous nature to the entire universe - it's all good.
Just a pity I have to have a passport to see some of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427468</id>
	<title>Military?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260719580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While technically military the "Gendarmerie Nationale" aren't exactly soldiers, from my understanding limited of how France works (le sange et sur l'arble?) they are cops who basically do all the shit that municipal police don't (although organized investigations are done by national police force), these guys do the running around, traffic,borders, small villages, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While technically military the " Gendarmerie Nationale " are n't exactly soldiers , from my understanding limited of how France works ( le sange et sur l'arble ?
) they are cops who basically do all the shit that municipal police do n't ( although organized investigations are done by national police force ) , these guys do the running around , traffic,borders , small villages , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While technically military the "Gendarmerie Nationale" aren't exactly soldiers, from my understanding limited of how France works (le sange et sur l'arble?
) they are cops who basically do all the shit that municipal police don't (although organized investigations are done by national police force), these guys do the running around, traffic,borders, small villages, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30431994</id>
	<title>Re:Naaaah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260810780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and even then pimply nerds do most of it by remote control.</p></div><p>I ran out of oxyclean you insensitive clod!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and even then pimply nerds do most of it by remote control.I ran out of oxyclean you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and even then pimply nerds do most of it by remote control.I ran out of oxyclean you insensitive clod!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429780</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>daem0n1x</author>
	<datestamp>1260797100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
They're just hurt because the French told them to fuck off when they took the criminal, insane and stupid decision of invading Iraq and wanted their friends to "play along". If the leaders of the nations that bought the "coalition of the willing" bullshit were any democratic they would have done the same, since the populations' support for Dubya's war for oil was near zero throughout most of Europe (and in the rest of the world, by the way).
</p><p>
They created the shit by yourselves. Now let them roll in it.
</p><p>
Taking into account they <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilbert\_du\_Motier,\_marquis\_de\_Lafayette" title="wikipedia.org">owe so much to the French</a> [wikipedia.org], these bigot jokes are extremely ingrate and rude.
</p><p>
I'm not French.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're just hurt because the French told them to fuck off when they took the criminal , insane and stupid decision of invading Iraq and wanted their friends to " play along " .
If the leaders of the nations that bought the " coalition of the willing " bullshit were any democratic they would have done the same , since the populations ' support for Dubya 's war for oil was near zero throughout most of Europe ( and in the rest of the world , by the way ) .
They created the shit by yourselves .
Now let them roll in it .
Taking into account they owe so much to the French [ wikipedia.org ] , these bigot jokes are extremely ingrate and rude .
I 'm not French .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
They're just hurt because the French told them to fuck off when they took the criminal, insane and stupid decision of invading Iraq and wanted their friends to "play along".
If the leaders of the nations that bought the "coalition of the willing" bullshit were any democratic they would have done the same, since the populations' support for Dubya's war for oil was near zero throughout most of Europe (and in the rest of the world, by the way).
They created the shit by yourselves.
Now let them roll in it.
Taking into account they owe so much to the French [wikipedia.org], these bigot jokes are extremely ingrate and rude.
I'm not French.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428670</id>
	<title>Re:Military?</title>
	<author>Lorens</author>
	<datestamp>1260822480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>While technically military the "Gendarmerie Nationale" aren't exactly soldiers</p></div><p>I do hope you don't usually associate people that "aren't exactly soldiers" with machine guns, parachutes, and armored cars sporting 90mm guns.</p><p>The Gendarmerie is not just "technically" a military organization. Even if since 2002 they report to Interior instead of Defense concerning their police duties, the gendarmes go to some lengths to keep themselves soldiers, starting off by working in uniform. They actually specify that they are wearing their uniform as part of their preamble for official transcripts of depositions or interrogations.</p><p>On the "police" side, they are responsible for the security of the citizens on 95\% of the territory (covering 50\% of the population), and that "administrative police" function occupies about half of their number, but they also provide the "military police" in the anglo-saxon sense of the term, the Coast Guard equivalent, the Presidential honor guard, as well as some more FBI-like tasks, but on the whole they are not at all like the FBI as the following AC says.</p><p>Yes, their cohabitation with the civilian "police" is sometimes a delicate balancing act, but well, they manage somehow.</p><p>The Spanish Guardia Civil and the Italian Carabinieri are two other exemples of the same evolution.</p><p>And yes, the gendarmes definitely use OpenOffice.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While technically military the " Gendarmerie Nationale " are n't exactly soldiersI do hope you do n't usually associate people that " are n't exactly soldiers " with machine guns , parachutes , and armored cars sporting 90mm guns.The Gendarmerie is not just " technically " a military organization .
Even if since 2002 they report to Interior instead of Defense concerning their police duties , the gendarmes go to some lengths to keep themselves soldiers , starting off by working in uniform .
They actually specify that they are wearing their uniform as part of their preamble for official transcripts of depositions or interrogations.On the " police " side , they are responsible for the security of the citizens on 95 \ % of the territory ( covering 50 \ % of the population ) , and that " administrative police " function occupies about half of their number , but they also provide the " military police " in the anglo-saxon sense of the term , the Coast Guard equivalent , the Presidential honor guard , as well as some more FBI-like tasks , but on the whole they are not at all like the FBI as the following AC says.Yes , their cohabitation with the civilian " police " is sometimes a delicate balancing act , but well , they manage somehow.The Spanish Guardia Civil and the Italian Carabinieri are two other exemples of the same evolution.And yes , the gendarmes definitely use OpenOffice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While technically military the "Gendarmerie Nationale" aren't exactly soldiersI do hope you don't usually associate people that "aren't exactly soldiers" with machine guns, parachutes, and armored cars sporting 90mm guns.The Gendarmerie is not just "technically" a military organization.
Even if since 2002 they report to Interior instead of Defense concerning their police duties, the gendarmes go to some lengths to keep themselves soldiers, starting off by working in uniform.
They actually specify that they are wearing their uniform as part of their preamble for official transcripts of depositions or interrogations.On the "police" side, they are responsible for the security of the citizens on 95\% of the territory (covering 50\% of the population), and that "administrative police" function occupies about half of their number, but they also provide the "military police" in the anglo-saxon sense of the term, the Coast Guard equivalent, the Presidential honor guard, as well as some more FBI-like tasks, but on the whole they are not at all like the FBI as the following AC says.Yes, their cohabitation with the civilian "police" is sometimes a delicate balancing act, but well, they manage somehow.The Spanish Guardia Civil and the Italian Carabinieri are two other exemples of the same evolution.And yes, the gendarmes definitely use OpenOffice.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30433206</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>tokul</author>
	<datestamp>1260816300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Poland would have done better if they had know beforehand that France (and Britan) were not going to back them.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Do they need more than <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich\_Agreement" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">one year warning</a> [wikipedia.org] in advance?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Poland would have done better if they had know beforehand that France ( and Britan ) were not going to back them .
Do they need more than one year warning [ wikipedia.org ] in advance ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Poland would have done better if they had know beforehand that France (and Britan) were not going to back them.
Do they need more than one year warning [wikipedia.org] in advance?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430552</id>
	<title>Re:Watch patriotic American geeks heads explode</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260804000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am a patriotic American nerd.  I'm embarrassed by our military complex not selecting FOSS solutions and I'm embarrassed that the USA Government hasn't mandated FOSS document use for all federal government departments as well.  All information exchange should not require the use of proprietary document tools.</p><p>I guess the French don't have to deal with internal lobbyists providing millions of political dollars to elected officials so they can make better long term decisions?</p><p>Any person who is not eligible to vote in an election should be prohibited from providing any political support to candidates, period.  That prevents companies (Microsoft, GM, Ford, Lockheed, Boeing, Citi, etc) and non-citizens from directly screwing with our political process.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am a patriotic American nerd .
I 'm embarrassed by our military complex not selecting FOSS solutions and I 'm embarrassed that the USA Government has n't mandated FOSS document use for all federal government departments as well .
All information exchange should not require the use of proprietary document tools.I guess the French do n't have to deal with internal lobbyists providing millions of political dollars to elected officials so they can make better long term decisions ? Any person who is not eligible to vote in an election should be prohibited from providing any political support to candidates , period .
That prevents companies ( Microsoft , GM , Ford , Lockheed , Boeing , Citi , etc ) and non-citizens from directly screwing with our political process .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am a patriotic American nerd.
I'm embarrassed by our military complex not selecting FOSS solutions and I'm embarrassed that the USA Government hasn't mandated FOSS document use for all federal government departments as well.
All information exchange should not require the use of proprietary document tools.I guess the French don't have to deal with internal lobbyists providing millions of political dollars to elected officials so they can make better long term decisions?Any person who is not eligible to vote in an election should be prohibited from providing any political support to candidates, period.
That prevents companies (Microsoft, GM, Ford, Lockheed, Boeing, Citi, etc) and non-citizens from directly screwing with our political process.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428994</id>
	<title>Watch patriotic American geeks heads explode</title>
	<author>fantomas</author>
	<datestamp>1260783900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm going to love this one. How are the patriotic American geeks going to respond? US military goes with Microsoft products, French military supports open source....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to love this one .
How are the patriotic American geeks going to respond ?
US military goes with Microsoft products , French military supports open source... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to love this one.
How are the patriotic American geeks going to respond?
US military goes with Microsoft products, French military supports open source....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30439320</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260804060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think much of it has to do with the fact they pulled out of vietnam (we try to spin it as them dumping their problem onto us, but in reality, they realized that country was not worth their time, and was a loss already, while we actually saw it ast he same, but a good way to increase military spending and profits for profiteers)</p><p>Then they pulled out of israel, and we filled in the void. They pulled out of israel not due to fear, but because Israel started committing acts of terrorism on palestine to fuel war to justify their victimhood and to gain more land (I know this is taboo, but Israel is not as innocent as they are made out to be, neither sides are, in fact it isnt our fight) But we got involved because we have two interests there, one is because they're one major port into the middle east that is US-friendly, and it helped us get into middle east conflicts and get to the oil better, two, the fact there is a sizeable jewish population in the US that cried out for action, and politicians love votes from specific demographics. So we also call the french cowards for doing this.</p><p>We also give them shit for getting mowed down by the Germans, who were largely unopposed because they invaded and totally destroyed several peaceful nations and invaded on an unprotected front, the border of an allied country. While having groups of their soldiers chilling and not doing anything on the protected front as a distraction. They did it so quickly that by the time the french assembled troops to protect that front, the Germans had already taken over Paris. We're talking within a day or two.</p><p>On the subject of being invaded and being ineffective, the US has been invaded before, much the same way. The war of 1812 where Canada under Admiral Cockburn, took the unprotected route, raided the capitol, and ate the President's dinner, then burned the white house down. Something not mentioned very often in our history here.</p><p>Prior to that, the french helped us gain independence, and gave us considerable muscle against the British, and sold us the Louisiana Purchase, not to mention, are the only group of people who kept the middle east largely in check, and did so more efficiently than we have. Though their methods were much more unorthodox (they conquered completely, and destroyed anyone and everyone who lay in their path)</p><p>I am american, and yes I am pro-american too. Blind pride and nationalism in my opinion are unpatriotic, and only serve those in power, and not the people. Just wanted to throw that in before the ultra conservative "YOU HATE AMERICA IF YOU DONT SEE THINGS THE WAY I DO" types jump in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think much of it has to do with the fact they pulled out of vietnam ( we try to spin it as them dumping their problem onto us , but in reality , they realized that country was not worth their time , and was a loss already , while we actually saw it ast he same , but a good way to increase military spending and profits for profiteers ) Then they pulled out of israel , and we filled in the void .
They pulled out of israel not due to fear , but because Israel started committing acts of terrorism on palestine to fuel war to justify their victimhood and to gain more land ( I know this is taboo , but Israel is not as innocent as they are made out to be , neither sides are , in fact it isnt our fight ) But we got involved because we have two interests there , one is because they 're one major port into the middle east that is US-friendly , and it helped us get into middle east conflicts and get to the oil better , two , the fact there is a sizeable jewish population in the US that cried out for action , and politicians love votes from specific demographics .
So we also call the french cowards for doing this.We also give them shit for getting mowed down by the Germans , who were largely unopposed because they invaded and totally destroyed several peaceful nations and invaded on an unprotected front , the border of an allied country .
While having groups of their soldiers chilling and not doing anything on the protected front as a distraction .
They did it so quickly that by the time the french assembled troops to protect that front , the Germans had already taken over Paris .
We 're talking within a day or two.On the subject of being invaded and being ineffective , the US has been invaded before , much the same way .
The war of 1812 where Canada under Admiral Cockburn , took the unprotected route , raided the capitol , and ate the President 's dinner , then burned the white house down .
Something not mentioned very often in our history here.Prior to that , the french helped us gain independence , and gave us considerable muscle against the British , and sold us the Louisiana Purchase , not to mention , are the only group of people who kept the middle east largely in check , and did so more efficiently than we have .
Though their methods were much more unorthodox ( they conquered completely , and destroyed anyone and everyone who lay in their path ) I am american , and yes I am pro-american too .
Blind pride and nationalism in my opinion are unpatriotic , and only serve those in power , and not the people .
Just wanted to throw that in before the ultra conservative " YOU HATE AMERICA IF YOU DONT SEE THINGS THE WAY I DO " types jump in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think much of it has to do with the fact they pulled out of vietnam (we try to spin it as them dumping their problem onto us, but in reality, they realized that country was not worth their time, and was a loss already, while we actually saw it ast he same, but a good way to increase military spending and profits for profiteers)Then they pulled out of israel, and we filled in the void.
They pulled out of israel not due to fear, but because Israel started committing acts of terrorism on palestine to fuel war to justify their victimhood and to gain more land (I know this is taboo, but Israel is not as innocent as they are made out to be, neither sides are, in fact it isnt our fight) But we got involved because we have two interests there, one is because they're one major port into the middle east that is US-friendly, and it helped us get into middle east conflicts and get to the oil better, two, the fact there is a sizeable jewish population in the US that cried out for action, and politicians love votes from specific demographics.
So we also call the french cowards for doing this.We also give them shit for getting mowed down by the Germans, who were largely unopposed because they invaded and totally destroyed several peaceful nations and invaded on an unprotected front, the border of an allied country.
While having groups of their soldiers chilling and not doing anything on the protected front as a distraction.
They did it so quickly that by the time the french assembled troops to protect that front, the Germans had already taken over Paris.
We're talking within a day or two.On the subject of being invaded and being ineffective, the US has been invaded before, much the same way.
The war of 1812 where Canada under Admiral Cockburn, took the unprotected route, raided the capitol, and ate the President's dinner, then burned the white house down.
Something not mentioned very often in our history here.Prior to that, the french helped us gain independence, and gave us considerable muscle against the British, and sold us the Louisiana Purchase, not to mention, are the only group of people who kept the middle east largely in check, and did so more efficiently than we have.
Though their methods were much more unorthodox (they conquered completely, and destroyed anyone and everyone who lay in their path)I am american, and yes I am pro-american too.
Blind pride and nationalism in my opinion are unpatriotic, and only serve those in power, and not the people.
Just wanted to throw that in before the ultra conservative "YOU HATE AMERICA IF YOU DONT SEE THINGS THE WAY I DO" types jump in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429806</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>LogicalError</author>
	<datestamp>1260797520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also keep in mind that the French just lost an entire generation in a very brutal war (world war I) and weren't exactly in the mood to repeat that -horrific- experience</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also keep in mind that the French just lost an entire generation in a very brutal war ( world war I ) and were n't exactly in the mood to repeat that -horrific- experience</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also keep in mind that the French just lost an entire generation in a very brutal war (world war I) and weren't exactly in the mood to repeat that -horrific- experience</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430248</id>
	<title>Re:Choice of Commandos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260801840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Britney Spears underwear is a lot more secure than Outlook.</i></p><p>Yeah, but she has had thousands of updates. Who knows what the current release number is!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Britney Spears underwear is a lot more secure than Outlook.Yeah , but she has had thousands of updates .
Who knows what the current release number is !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Britney Spears underwear is a lot more secure than Outlook.Yeah, but she has had thousands of updates.
Who knows what the current release number is!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427434</id>
	<title>Thunderbirds are Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260719100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All sorts of good space news.  SpaceShip Two is getting ready to launch.  And now Thunderbird 3 is about to be released, with some good code from the French Military Program.</p><p>Thunderbirds are Go!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All sorts of good space news .
SpaceShip Two is getting ready to launch .
And now Thunderbird 3 is about to be released , with some good code from the French Military Program.Thunderbirds are Go !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All sorts of good space news.
SpaceShip Two is getting ready to launch.
And now Thunderbird 3 is about to be released, with some good code from the French Military Program.Thunderbirds are Go!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429864</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1260798180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But with that said: the French were absolutely right about standing up to Bush against an unnecessary war. All they had to do was commit a symbolic number of troops to "fight" in some relatively peaceful outback region like other countries did. If only more people stood up to the false claims...</p></div><p>If this is the French version of standing up to Bush, then perhaps they deserve what other people say about them. A recent-ish survey I cannot currently locate claims that the French hate themselves more than anyone else does, so perhaps further they know something we don't. There is a lot of bad blood left over from war between the English and French, and Americans are more British than they know, having retained many of the attitudes and prejudices of that past. I can't help but notice that the USA and the UK are the world's primary surveillance societies, either.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But with that said : the French were absolutely right about standing up to Bush against an unnecessary war .
All they had to do was commit a symbolic number of troops to " fight " in some relatively peaceful outback region like other countries did .
If only more people stood up to the false claims...If this is the French version of standing up to Bush , then perhaps they deserve what other people say about them .
A recent-ish survey I can not currently locate claims that the French hate themselves more than anyone else does , so perhaps further they know something we do n't .
There is a lot of bad blood left over from war between the English and French , and Americans are more British than they know , having retained many of the attitudes and prejudices of that past .
I ca n't help but notice that the USA and the UK are the world 's primary surveillance societies , either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But with that said: the French were absolutely right about standing up to Bush against an unnecessary war.
All they had to do was commit a symbolic number of troops to "fight" in some relatively peaceful outback region like other countries did.
If only more people stood up to the false claims...If this is the French version of standing up to Bush, then perhaps they deserve what other people say about them.
A recent-ish survey I cannot currently locate claims that the French hate themselves more than anyone else does, so perhaps further they know something we don't.
There is a lot of bad blood left over from war between the English and French, and Americans are more British than they know, having retained many of the attitudes and prejudices of that past.
I can't help but notice that the USA and the UK are the world's primary surveillance societies, either.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428274</id>
	<title>Re:French thunderbirds rock</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260729240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Firefox 3.5 use the about:config editor. Come on, you're a slashdotter and should know better.</p><p>Change the value of browser.urlbar.matchBehavior to 3<br>Change the value of browser.urlbar.default.behavior to 17<br>Change the values of both browser.urlbar.match.url and<br>browser.urlbar.restrict.typed to empty strings<br>Change the values of both places.frecency.numVisits and places.frecency.linkVisitBonus to 0</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Firefox 3.5 use the about : config editor .
Come on , you 're a slashdotter and should know better.Change the value of browser.urlbar.matchBehavior to 3Change the value of browser.urlbar.default.behavior to 17Change the values of both browser.urlbar.match.url andbrowser.urlbar.restrict.typed to empty stringsChange the values of both places.frecency.numVisits and places.frecency.linkVisitBonus to 0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Firefox 3.5 use the about:config editor.
Come on, you're a slashdotter and should know better.Change the value of browser.urlbar.matchBehavior to 3Change the value of browser.urlbar.default.behavior to 17Change the values of both browser.urlbar.match.url andbrowser.urlbar.restrict.typed to empty stringsChange the values of both places.frecency.numVisits and places.frecency.linkVisitBonus to 0</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430640</id>
	<title>Re:Watch patriotic American geeks heads explode</title>
	<author>dontgetshocked</author>
	<datestamp>1260804360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One correction.The US navy does use Linux.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One correction.The US navy does use Linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One correction.The US navy does use Linux.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429468</id>
	<title>Re:Open source software and govt's</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1260791880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Very nice letter. For those two lazy to RTFL, here are some key points:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It is also necessary to make it clear that the aim of the Bill we are discussing is not directly related to the amount of direct savings that can by made by using free software in state institutions. That is in any case a marginal aggregate value, but in no way is it the chief focus of the Bill. The basic principles which inspire the Bill are linked to the basic guarantees of a state of law, such as: Free access to public information by the citizen. Permanence of public data. Security of the State and citizens.</p> </div><p><div class="quote"><p>The Bill does not introduce any discrimination whatever, since it only establishes *how* the goods have to be provided (which is a state power) and not *who* has to provide them (which would effectively be discriminatory, if restrictions based on national origin, race religion, ideology, sexual preference etc. were imposed). On the contrary, the Bill is decidedly antidiscriminatory. This is so because by defining with no room for doubt the conditions for the provision of software, it prevents state bodies from using software which has a license including discriminatory conditions.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>Your letter continues: "4. The bill imposes the use of open source software without considering the dangers that this can bring from the point of view of security, guarantee, and possible violation of the intellectual property rights of third parties."</p><p>Alluding in an abstract way to "the dangers this can bring", without specifically mentioning a single one of these supposed dangers, shows at the least some lack of knowledge of the topic.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>This observation is wrong; in principle, freedom and lack of cost are orthogonal concepts: there is software which is proprietary and charged for (for example, MS Office), software which is proprietary and free of charge (MS Internet Explorer), software which is free and charged for (RedHat, SuSE etc Gnu/Linux distributions), software which is free and not charged for (Apache, OpenOffice, Mozilla), and even software which can be licensed in a range of combinations (MySQL).</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>The model of free software in no way implies ignorance of these laws, and in fact the great majority of free software is covered by copyright. In reality, the inclusion of this question in your observations shows your confusion in respect of the legal framework in which free software is developed. The inclusion of the intellectual property of others in works claimed as one's own is not a practice that has been noted in the free software community; whereas, unfortunately, it has been in the area of proprietry software. As an example, the condemnation by the Commercial Court of Nanterre, France, on 27th September 2001 of Microsoft Corp. to a penalty of 3 million francs in damages and interest, for violation of intellectual property (piracy, to use the unfortunate term that your firm commonly uses in its publicity).</p> </div><p>I'm very glad that the Peruvian government has individuals as intelligent and well-versed in the issues as he is. If you look at some of Microsoft's arguments, such as that "the bill makes it compulsory for all public bodies to use only free software, that is to say open source software, which breaches the principles of equality before the law, that of non-discrimination and the right of free private enterprise, freedom of industry and of contract, protected by the constitution," it's obvious that they're just grasping for straws and that free software is probably going to win in Peru. Kudos for making it happen.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Very nice letter .
For those two lazy to RTFL , here are some key points : It is also necessary to make it clear that the aim of the Bill we are discussing is not directly related to the amount of direct savings that can by made by using free software in state institutions .
That is in any case a marginal aggregate value , but in no way is it the chief focus of the Bill .
The basic principles which inspire the Bill are linked to the basic guarantees of a state of law , such as : Free access to public information by the citizen .
Permanence of public data .
Security of the State and citizens .
The Bill does not introduce any discrimination whatever , since it only establishes * how * the goods have to be provided ( which is a state power ) and not * who * has to provide them ( which would effectively be discriminatory , if restrictions based on national origin , race religion , ideology , sexual preference etc .
were imposed ) .
On the contrary , the Bill is decidedly antidiscriminatory .
This is so because by defining with no room for doubt the conditions for the provision of software , it prevents state bodies from using software which has a license including discriminatory conditions.Your letter continues : " 4 .
The bill imposes the use of open source software without considering the dangers that this can bring from the point of view of security , guarantee , and possible violation of the intellectual property rights of third parties .
" Alluding in an abstract way to " the dangers this can bring " , without specifically mentioning a single one of these supposed dangers , shows at the least some lack of knowledge of the topic.This observation is wrong ; in principle , freedom and lack of cost are orthogonal concepts : there is software which is proprietary and charged for ( for example , MS Office ) , software which is proprietary and free of charge ( MS Internet Explorer ) , software which is free and charged for ( RedHat , SuSE etc Gnu/Linux distributions ) , software which is free and not charged for ( Apache , OpenOffice , Mozilla ) , and even software which can be licensed in a range of combinations ( MySQL ) .The model of free software in no way implies ignorance of these laws , and in fact the great majority of free software is covered by copyright .
In reality , the inclusion of this question in your observations shows your confusion in respect of the legal framework in which free software is developed .
The inclusion of the intellectual property of others in works claimed as one 's own is not a practice that has been noted in the free software community ; whereas , unfortunately , it has been in the area of proprietry software .
As an example , the condemnation by the Commercial Court of Nanterre , France , on 27th September 2001 of Microsoft Corp. to a penalty of 3 million francs in damages and interest , for violation of intellectual property ( piracy , to use the unfortunate term that your firm commonly uses in its publicity ) .
I 'm very glad that the Peruvian government has individuals as intelligent and well-versed in the issues as he is .
If you look at some of Microsoft 's arguments , such as that " the bill makes it compulsory for all public bodies to use only free software , that is to say open source software , which breaches the principles of equality before the law , that of non-discrimination and the right of free private enterprise , freedom of industry and of contract , protected by the constitution , " it 's obvious that they 're just grasping for straws and that free software is probably going to win in Peru .
Kudos for making it happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very nice letter.
For those two lazy to RTFL, here are some key points:It is also necessary to make it clear that the aim of the Bill we are discussing is not directly related to the amount of direct savings that can by made by using free software in state institutions.
That is in any case a marginal aggregate value, but in no way is it the chief focus of the Bill.
The basic principles which inspire the Bill are linked to the basic guarantees of a state of law, such as: Free access to public information by the citizen.
Permanence of public data.
Security of the State and citizens.
The Bill does not introduce any discrimination whatever, since it only establishes *how* the goods have to be provided (which is a state power) and not *who* has to provide them (which would effectively be discriminatory, if restrictions based on national origin, race religion, ideology, sexual preference etc.
were imposed).
On the contrary, the Bill is decidedly antidiscriminatory.
This is so because by defining with no room for doubt the conditions for the provision of software, it prevents state bodies from using software which has a license including discriminatory conditions.Your letter continues: "4.
The bill imposes the use of open source software without considering the dangers that this can bring from the point of view of security, guarantee, and possible violation of the intellectual property rights of third parties.
"Alluding in an abstract way to "the dangers this can bring", without specifically mentioning a single one of these supposed dangers, shows at the least some lack of knowledge of the topic.This observation is wrong; in principle, freedom and lack of cost are orthogonal concepts: there is software which is proprietary and charged for (for example, MS Office), software which is proprietary and free of charge (MS Internet Explorer), software which is free and charged for (RedHat, SuSE etc Gnu/Linux distributions), software which is free and not charged for (Apache, OpenOffice, Mozilla), and even software which can be licensed in a range of combinations (MySQL).The model of free software in no way implies ignorance of these laws, and in fact the great majority of free software is covered by copyright.
In reality, the inclusion of this question in your observations shows your confusion in respect of the legal framework in which free software is developed.
The inclusion of the intellectual property of others in works claimed as one's own is not a practice that has been noted in the free software community; whereas, unfortunately, it has been in the area of proprietry software.
As an example, the condemnation by the Commercial Court of Nanterre, France, on 27th September 2001 of Microsoft Corp. to a penalty of 3 million francs in damages and interest, for violation of intellectual property (piracy, to use the unfortunate term that your firm commonly uses in its publicity).
I'm very glad that the Peruvian government has individuals as intelligent and well-versed in the issues as he is.
If you look at some of Microsoft's arguments, such as that "the bill makes it compulsory for all public bodies to use only free software, that is to say open source software, which breaches the principles of equality before the law, that of non-discrimination and the right of free private enterprise, freedom of industry and of contract, protected by the constitution," it's obvious that they're just grasping for straws and that free software is probably going to win in Peru.
Kudos for making it happen.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427382</id>
	<title>At Least...</title>
	<author>Nemyst</author>
	<datestamp>1260718560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least some government agencies seem to understand that open source CAN be secure, stable and worthwhile. More power to them I say, they're quite forward-thinking on those matters it seems.<br>
<br>
If only more could see that! With every new user, especially military organizations and government agencies, there are more bug fixes, more patches and more useful features added into the open source projects they use. That in turn makes the projects more appealing, more competitive and generally better, which closes the loop by enticing more to adopt it. We just need to get the ball rolling and, most importantly, to break old notions of open source being garage-geek-type material; I think we've seen all around us that we've evolved from that point.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least some government agencies seem to understand that open source CAN be secure , stable and worthwhile .
More power to them I say , they 're quite forward-thinking on those matters it seems .
If only more could see that !
With every new user , especially military organizations and government agencies , there are more bug fixes , more patches and more useful features added into the open source projects they use .
That in turn makes the projects more appealing , more competitive and generally better , which closes the loop by enticing more to adopt it .
We just need to get the ball rolling and , most importantly , to break old notions of open source being garage-geek-type material ; I think we 've seen all around us that we 've evolved from that point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least some government agencies seem to understand that open source CAN be secure, stable and worthwhile.
More power to them I say, they're quite forward-thinking on those matters it seems.
If only more could see that!
With every new user, especially military organizations and government agencies, there are more bug fixes, more patches and more useful features added into the open source projects they use.
That in turn makes the projects more appealing, more competitive and generally better, which closes the loop by enticing more to adopt it.
We just need to get the ball rolling and, most importantly, to break old notions of open source being garage-geek-type material; I think we've seen all around us that we've evolved from that point.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30434266</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260821880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dont think anyone should be proud of WWII</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dont think anyone should be proud of WWII</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dont think anyone should be proud of WWII</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427372</id>
	<title>French thunderbirds rock</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260718560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Take a look at some of the footage of those French fighter jocks doing terrain avoidance at a few feet high. Incredible.</p><p>As for thunderbird the email program, I like some things about 3, and not others. I'm glad the devs allow you to switch the old toolbar back on. Much better than the Mozilla Firefox attitude of forcing you into changes you don't want to make.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Take a look at some of the footage of those French fighter jocks doing terrain avoidance at a few feet high .
Incredible.As for thunderbird the email program , I like some things about 3 , and not others .
I 'm glad the devs allow you to switch the old toolbar back on .
Much better than the Mozilla Firefox attitude of forcing you into changes you do n't want to make .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take a look at some of the footage of those French fighter jocks doing terrain avoidance at a few feet high.
Incredible.As for thunderbird the email program, I like some things about 3, and not others.
I'm glad the devs allow you to switch the old toolbar back on.
Much better than the Mozilla Firefox attitude of forcing you into changes you don't want to make.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30443296</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>MightyDrunken</author>
	<datestamp>1260888600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not sure what the intent of this post is but it is very relevant to point out that France helped the USA in both of these wars against the British.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure what the intent of this post is but it is very relevant to point out that France helped the USA in both of these wars against the British .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure what the intent of this post is but it is very relevant to point out that France helped the USA in both of these wars against the British.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260721980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sometimes, a joke is just a joke. No strings attached, no intent to offend, no distaste for others, just a comment made in jest.  The same people that make the surrender jokes will often make fun of their own nation just as quickly.</p><p>Try removing your head from your ass, you might see things a bit more clearly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sometimes , a joke is just a joke .
No strings attached , no intent to offend , no distaste for others , just a comment made in jest .
The same people that make the surrender jokes will often make fun of their own nation just as quickly.Try removing your head from your ass , you might see things a bit more clearly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sometimes, a joke is just a joke.
No strings attached, no intent to offend, no distaste for others, just a comment made in jest.
The same people that make the surrender jokes will often make fun of their own nation just as quickly.Try removing your head from your ass, you might see things a bit more clearly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427408</id>
	<title>How About a Plain Text Mode?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260718800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doing away with all of the potential HTML, javascript, Java, Flash etc vulnerabilities by having a forced plain text only mode would sure help with security and privacy issues.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Doing away with all of the potential HTML , javascript , Java , Flash etc vulnerabilities by having a forced plain text only mode would sure help with security and privacy issues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doing away with all of the potential HTML, javascript, Java, Flash etc vulnerabilities by having a forced plain text only mode would sure help with security and privacy issues.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429256</id>
	<title>And sometimes a joke isn't a joke</title>
	<author>aepervius</author>
	<datestamp>1260788460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am French, I do not care for THAT joke in itself and I don't feel offended, but it certainly help me categorise my interlocutor. Think about it, I am on a forum, discussing X,Y,Z subject and some US guy come in and make the "rifle not used in 1940" joke or another of those surrender joke. What does it say on the intent of the "joker" ? Just choosing THAT type of joke in that context ?  Humour seems almost certainly not the goal. Maybe teasing being generous with the "joker", or insult more probably. Anyway, who cares ? The teller of such overused joke look like bigoted idiot and will be mostly ignored, as the gp poster said.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am French , I do not care for THAT joke in itself and I do n't feel offended , but it certainly help me categorise my interlocutor .
Think about it , I am on a forum , discussing X,Y,Z subject and some US guy come in and make the " rifle not used in 1940 " joke or another of those surrender joke .
What does it say on the intent of the " joker " ?
Just choosing THAT type of joke in that context ?
Humour seems almost certainly not the goal .
Maybe teasing being generous with the " joker " , or insult more probably .
Anyway , who cares ?
The teller of such overused joke look like bigoted idiot and will be mostly ignored , as the gp poster said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am French, I do not care for THAT joke in itself and I don't feel offended, but it certainly help me categorise my interlocutor.
Think about it, I am on a forum, discussing X,Y,Z subject and some US guy come in and make the "rifle not used in 1940" joke or another of those surrender joke.
What does it say on the intent of the "joker" ?
Just choosing THAT type of joke in that context ?
Humour seems almost certainly not the goal.
Maybe teasing being generous with the "joker", or insult more probably.
Anyway, who cares ?
The teller of such overused joke look like bigoted idiot and will be mostly ignored, as the gp poster said.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430538</id>
	<title>Re:Watch patriotic American geeks heads explode</title>
	<author>osobear</author>
	<datestamp>1260803820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since when does American patiotism imply anti-French bigotry?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when does American patiotism imply anti-French bigotry ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when does American patiotism imply anti-French bigotry?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430084</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260800400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>USA never gets involved in a war that you don't are completely and massively military superior in.</p></div><p>Right... The American Revolution never happened.</p><p>The only reason NOW the USA never gets involved in a war they aren't militarily superior in is because they are militarily superior to everyone.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>USA never gets involved in a war that you do n't are completely and massively military superior in.Right... The American Revolution never happened.The only reason NOW the USA never gets involved in a war they are n't militarily superior in is because they are militarily superior to everyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>USA never gets involved in a war that you don't are completely and massively military superior in.Right... The American Revolution never happened.The only reason NOW the USA never gets involved in a war they aren't militarily superior in is because they are militarily superior to everyone.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430574</id>
	<title>Brits to italian jokes on that, not french</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260804120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Brits to italian jokes on that, not french: "The new Italian tank has 8 gears: 1 forward, 7 reverse".</p><p>Mostly because when Rommel wasn't in Africa, the Italian troops retreated thousands of miles.</p><p>Rommel got them all back again, but left and the Italian led german troops retreated thousands of miles again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Brits to italian jokes on that , not french : " The new Italian tank has 8 gears : 1 forward , 7 reverse " .Mostly because when Rommel was n't in Africa , the Italian troops retreated thousands of miles.Rommel got them all back again , but left and the Italian led german troops retreated thousands of miles again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brits to italian jokes on that, not french: "The new Italian tank has 8 gears: 1 forward, 7 reverse".Mostly because when Rommel wasn't in Africa, the Italian troops retreated thousands of miles.Rommel got them all back again, but left and the Italian led german troops retreated thousands of miles again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430134</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260800880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The difference is that the germans appeared all over france in full strength, that is, by both air and land and from a closer distance to "base" so to speak. The british pretty much had to deflect "just" (as if it was easy anyway) the luftwaffe to defend themselves due to tanks not being that good at swimming. Hardly a fair comparison.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The difference is that the germans appeared all over france in full strength , that is , by both air and land and from a closer distance to " base " so to speak .
The british pretty much had to deflect " just " ( as if it was easy anyway ) the luftwaffe to defend themselves due to tanks not being that good at swimming .
Hardly a fair comparison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The difference is that the germans appeared all over france in full strength, that is, by both air and land and from a closer distance to "base" so to speak.
The british pretty much had to deflect "just" (as if it was easy anyway) the luftwaffe to defend themselves due to tanks not being that good at swimming.
Hardly a fair comparison.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429828</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>LogicalError</author>
	<datestamp>1260797820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Well, you don't hear many jokes about Poland, The Netherlands or Belgium being invaded by the Germans.</p></div><p>The Netherlands never stood a chance. We had canons more than a century old for protection!
When we refused to surrender they just completely levelled Rotterdam and threatened to do the same to other major cities.
If we continued to fight, there wouldn't have been much left of the Netherlands and we'd still have lost.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , you do n't hear many jokes about Poland , The Netherlands or Belgium being invaded by the Germans.The Netherlands never stood a chance .
We had canons more than a century old for protection !
When we refused to surrender they just completely levelled Rotterdam and threatened to do the same to other major cities .
If we continued to fight , there would n't have been much left of the Netherlands and we 'd still have lost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, you don't hear many jokes about Poland, The Netherlands or Belgium being invaded by the Germans.The Netherlands never stood a chance.
We had canons more than a century old for protection!
When we refused to surrender they just completely levelled Rotterdam and threatened to do the same to other major cities.
If we continued to fight, there wouldn't have been much left of the Netherlands and we'd still have lost.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427906</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>otis wildflower</author>
	<datestamp>1260724620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Knock knock.</p><p>Who's there?</p><p>Shut the fuck up, Donny.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Knock knock.Who 's there ? Shut the fuck up , Donny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knock knock.Who's there?Shut the fuck up, Donny.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427766</id>
	<title>Re:At Least...</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1260723120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; If only more could see that!</p><p>Careful.  If it becomes very important to them they may decide they need to control it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; If only more could see that ! Careful .
If it becomes very important to them they may decide they need to control it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; If only more could see that!Careful.
If it becomes very important to them they may decide they need to control it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427816</id>
	<title>Damn you!</title>
	<author>WiiVault</author>
	<datestamp>1260723600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Excuse me. Are you suggesting the French give up easy? Alright you win.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Excuse me .
Are you suggesting the French give up easy ?
Alright you win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excuse me.
Are you suggesting the French give up easy?
Alright you win.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429462</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260791640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really?  I guess I missed the part were the French helped the Poles as per their treaty.  Poland would have done better if they had know beforehand that France (and Britan) were not going to back them.</p><p>In fact, it wasn't until France was attacked 8 months later that they even started fighting.</p><p>Read up on the Phony War<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoney\_War" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoney\_War</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Hell, France lasted a little over two weeks longer than Poland and it did not have the soviet union to deal with (and had eight months of knowing that Germany was on the military move.)</p><p>I am sure France has many things to be proud of, but World War II should not be one of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
I guess I missed the part were the French helped the Poles as per their treaty .
Poland would have done better if they had know beforehand that France ( and Britan ) were not going to back them.In fact , it was n't until France was attacked 8 months later that they even started fighting.Read up on the Phony Warhttp : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoney \ _War [ wikipedia.org ] Hell , France lasted a little over two weeks longer than Poland and it did not have the soviet union to deal with ( and had eight months of knowing that Germany was on the military move .
) I am sure France has many things to be proud of , but World War II should not be one of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
I guess I missed the part were the French helped the Poles as per their treaty.
Poland would have done better if they had know beforehand that France (and Britan) were not going to back them.In fact, it wasn't until France was attacked 8 months later that they even started fighting.Read up on the Phony Warhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoney\_War [wikipedia.org]Hell, France lasted a little over two weeks longer than Poland and it did not have the soviet union to deal with (and had eight months of knowing that Germany was on the military move.
)I am sure France has many things to be proud of, but World War II should not be one of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429110</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>LordAndrewSama</author>
	<datestamp>1260786120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm british you insensitive clo-  where'd he go?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm british you insensitive clo- where 'd he go ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm british you insensitive clo-  where'd he go?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427728</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260722760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where's that -1 Don't Care moderation...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's that -1 Do n't Care moderation.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's that -1 Don't Care moderation...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430078</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260800340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Its worth noting as well that every other European country attacked (including Russia at the start) pretty much collapsed under the blitzkrieg.</p></div><p>Yes, but which other European country had a military even a fraction of the size of Frances? Thought so.</p></div><p> <b>Within Europe</b> a lot of countries had a military larger and better equiped than France. France had most of their military stationed far away from France. Soviet had a larger (semi-)professional army and Sweden had a more than thousand year long tradition of a peoples army (with the exception of 50 years when a semi-professional army was used (Sweden reqruited one of Napoleons Marshals for king)). Pretty much every male adult citizen within Sweden was a reasonably well trained soldier (at least compared to most of the German military, which was really badly trained and usually to young or to old to make good soldiers), altough the stores of military equipment within Sweden wasn't large enough to put everybody into arms at the beginning of the war and there was a lack of officers; Sweden stayed neutral during the whole conflict (at least officially, unofficially they helped both sides).  Polish forces was huge in manpower and horses, but slightly outdated in equipment and many of them friendly towards Nazi Germany.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its worth noting as well that every other European country attacked ( including Russia at the start ) pretty much collapsed under the blitzkrieg.Yes , but which other European country had a military even a fraction of the size of Frances ?
Thought so .
Within Europe a lot of countries had a military larger and better equiped than France .
France had most of their military stationed far away from France .
Soviet had a larger ( semi- ) professional army and Sweden had a more than thousand year long tradition of a peoples army ( with the exception of 50 years when a semi-professional army was used ( Sweden reqruited one of Napoleons Marshals for king ) ) .
Pretty much every male adult citizen within Sweden was a reasonably well trained soldier ( at least compared to most of the German military , which was really badly trained and usually to young or to old to make good soldiers ) , altough the stores of military equipment within Sweden was n't large enough to put everybody into arms at the beginning of the war and there was a lack of officers ; Sweden stayed neutral during the whole conflict ( at least officially , unofficially they helped both sides ) .
Polish forces was huge in manpower and horses , but slightly outdated in equipment and many of them friendly towards Nazi Germany .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its worth noting as well that every other European country attacked (including Russia at the start) pretty much collapsed under the blitzkrieg.Yes, but which other European country had a military even a fraction of the size of Frances?
Thought so.
Within Europe a lot of countries had a military larger and better equiped than France.
France had most of their military stationed far away from France.
Soviet had a larger (semi-)professional army and Sweden had a more than thousand year long tradition of a peoples army (with the exception of 50 years when a semi-professional army was used (Sweden reqruited one of Napoleons Marshals for king)).
Pretty much every male adult citizen within Sweden was a reasonably well trained soldier (at least compared to most of the German military, which was really badly trained and usually to young or to old to make good soldiers), altough the stores of military equipment within Sweden wasn't large enough to put everybody into arms at the beginning of the war and there was a lack of officers; Sweden stayed neutral during the whole conflict (at least officially, unofficially they helped both sides).
Polish forces was huge in manpower and horses, but slightly outdated in equipment and many of them friendly towards Nazi Germany.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428524</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>phantomcircuit</author>
	<datestamp>1260733500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Its worth noting as well that every other European country attacked (including Russia at the start) pretty much collapsed under the blitzkrieg.</p></div><p>Yes, but which other European country had a military even a fraction of the size of Frances? Thought so.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its worth noting as well that every other European country attacked ( including Russia at the start ) pretty much collapsed under the blitzkrieg.Yes , but which other European country had a military even a fraction of the size of Frances ?
Thought so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its worth noting as well that every other European country attacked (including Russia at the start) pretty much collapsed under the blitzkrieg.Yes, but which other European country had a military even a fraction of the size of Frances?
Thought so.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429466</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260791880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many forevers have died in battle and are burred on american fighting for america.<br>I see no French, no Brits, no Italians. How many americans are buried in Europe defending its contrys from the natzies?<br>I see no need to dignify the French and there military power. When was the last war they won.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many forevers have died in battle and are burred on american fighting for america.I see no French , no Brits , no Italians .
How many americans are buried in Europe defending its contrys from the natzies ? I see no need to dignify the French and there military power .
When was the last war they won .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many forevers have died in battle and are burred on american fighting for america.I see no French, no Brits, no Italians.
How many americans are buried in Europe defending its contrys from the natzies?I see no need to dignify the French and there military power.
When was the last war they won.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30441100</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>slashdotwannabe</author>
	<datestamp>1260819660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sun Tzu said it all: the victorious general wins, and then goes to battle. The losing general goes to battle and then wonders why he does not win.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sun Tzu said it all : the victorious general wins , and then goes to battle .
The losing general goes to battle and then wonders why he does not win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sun Tzu said it all: the victorious general wins, and then goes to battle.
The losing general goes to battle and then wonders why he does not win.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428500</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260733020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone who gets their history lessons from Maddox's "The Best Page in the Universe" is a <b>FUCKING. MORON.</b></p><p>And now, for a funny retort to that list, <a href="http://www.exile.ru/2003-October-02/war\_nerd.html" title="exile.ru" rel="nofollow">the War Nerd.</a> [exile.ru]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone who gets their history lessons from Maddox 's " The Best Page in the Universe " is a FUCKING .
MORON.And now , for a funny retort to that list , the War Nerd .
[ exile.ru ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone who gets their history lessons from Maddox's "The Best Page in the Universe" is a FUCKING.
MORON.And now, for a funny retort to that list, the War Nerd.
[exile.ru]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427348</id>
	<title>It means a lot when Defense systems move over</title>
	<author>Kloplop321</author>
	<datestamp>1260718320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would guess that it means a lot for a country's defense administration to move over to Open Source. I've never heard of TrustedBird before this, but it seems a WHOLE lot more secure than Outlook is. I use Thunderbird personally.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would guess that it means a lot for a country 's defense administration to move over to Open Source .
I 've never heard of TrustedBird before this , but it seems a WHOLE lot more secure than Outlook is .
I use Thunderbird personally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would guess that it means a lot for a country's defense administration to move over to Open Source.
I've never heard of TrustedBird before this, but it seems a WHOLE lot more secure than Outlook is.
I use Thunderbird personally.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30432788</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Clandestine\_Blaze</author>
	<datestamp>1260814320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This copy-paste job posted by an anonymous coward. How telling. Let me guess, you don't have an account?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This copy-paste job posted by an anonymous coward .
How telling .
Let me guess , you do n't have an account ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This copy-paste job posted by an anonymous coward.
How telling.
Let me guess, you don't have an account?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428284</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260729360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the sad truth is in the big wide world Americans are not liked, i lost count of the amount of American backpackers in Europe with Canadian flags on there backpacks when asked why the answer was always the same<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... the were sick of getting abuse because of the governments interference with other countries<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... i personally have nothing against Americans however your government should take care of business at home and let the world be<nobr> <wbr></nobr>......</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the sad truth is in the big wide world Americans are not liked , i lost count of the amount of American backpackers in Europe with Canadian flags on there backpacks when asked why the answer was always the same ... the were sick of getting abuse because of the governments interference with other countries ... i personally have nothing against Americans however your government should take care of business at home and let the world be ..... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the sad truth is in the big wide world Americans are not liked, i lost count of the amount of American backpackers in Europe with Canadian flags on there backpacks when asked why the answer was always the same ... the were sick of getting abuse because of the governments interference with other countries ... i personally have nothing against Americans however your government should take care of business at home and let the world be ......</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430432</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>mutube</author>
	<datestamp>1260803040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Actually I think you'll find that Kiwis, Aussies and especially the Brits enjoy the "surrender monkey" theme just as much.</p></div></blockquote><p>I'm British and it annoys me.  "Cheese eating surrender monkeys" (Simpsons) was funny because it was over the top and ridiculous. It being parroted without even a hint of originality is just tiring. The thing about offensive jokes is that once they stop being funny they're just offensive.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually I think you 'll find that Kiwis , Aussies and especially the Brits enjoy the " surrender monkey " theme just as much.I 'm British and it annoys me .
" Cheese eating surrender monkeys " ( Simpsons ) was funny because it was over the top and ridiculous .
It being parroted without even a hint of originality is just tiring .
The thing about offensive jokes is that once they stop being funny they 're just offensive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually I think you'll find that Kiwis, Aussies and especially the Brits enjoy the "surrender monkey" theme just as much.I'm British and it annoys me.
"Cheese eating surrender monkeys" (Simpsons) was funny because it was over the top and ridiculous.
It being parroted without even a hint of originality is just tiring.
The thing about offensive jokes is that once they stop being funny they're just offensive.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324</id>
	<title>It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260718140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thunderbird just surrendered to Outlook on my computer.  Now it's even helping Outlook import old messages.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thunderbird just surrendered to Outlook on my computer .
Now it 's even helping Outlook import old messages .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thunderbird just surrendered to Outlook on my computer.
Now it's even helping Outlook import old messages.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428074</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260726660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like some frog blew all her mod points on you all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like some frog blew all her mod points on you all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like some frog blew all her mod points on you all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428266</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260729060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Well, you don't hear many jokes about Poland,</p></div><p>It's not so popular lately, but it used to be quite common to hear jokes about the Polish being bizarrely stupid.  For example, I saw a coffee mug someone made that says "Made in Poland" on the bottom, and has the handle on the inside.  I'd always assumed that the term RPN was mostly a joke, although Wikipedia tells me there is a legitimate Polish connection there.</p><p>Anyway, how about this one?</p><p>Heaven is a place where all the police are all British, the cooks are French, the mechanics are German, the lovers are Italian, and everything is organized by the Swiss.  In Hell, the cooks are all British, the mechanics are French, the police are German, the lovers are Swiss, and everything is organized by the Italians.</p><p>I've seen a couple of variations floating around with a few additions: in Heaven the wives are Japanese and the houses are American; in Hell the wives are American and the houses are Japanese.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , you do n't hear many jokes about Poland,It 's not so popular lately , but it used to be quite common to hear jokes about the Polish being bizarrely stupid .
For example , I saw a coffee mug someone made that says " Made in Poland " on the bottom , and has the handle on the inside .
I 'd always assumed that the term RPN was mostly a joke , although Wikipedia tells me there is a legitimate Polish connection there.Anyway , how about this one ? Heaven is a place where all the police are all British , the cooks are French , the mechanics are German , the lovers are Italian , and everything is organized by the Swiss .
In Hell , the cooks are all British , the mechanics are French , the police are German , the lovers are Swiss , and everything is organized by the Italians.I 've seen a couple of variations floating around with a few additions : in Heaven the wives are Japanese and the houses are American ; in Hell the wives are American and the houses are Japanese .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, you don't hear many jokes about Poland,It's not so popular lately, but it used to be quite common to hear jokes about the Polish being bizarrely stupid.
For example, I saw a coffee mug someone made that says "Made in Poland" on the bottom, and has the handle on the inside.
I'd always assumed that the term RPN was mostly a joke, although Wikipedia tells me there is a legitimate Polish connection there.Anyway, how about this one?Heaven is a place where all the police are all British, the cooks are French, the mechanics are German, the lovers are Italian, and everything is organized by the Swiss.
In Hell, the cooks are all British, the mechanics are French, the police are German, the lovers are Swiss, and everything is organized by the Italians.I've seen a couple of variations floating around with a few additions: in Heaven the wives are Japanese and the houses are American; in Hell the wives are American and the houses are Japanese.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429478</id>
	<title>Re:Military?</title>
	<author>bcmm</author>
	<datestamp>1260791940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>While technically military the "Gendarmerie Nationale" aren't exactly soldiers</p></div></blockquote><p>They are, for example, one of about two police forces in the world with a parachute division, and GIGN is more often compared to the SAS than to SWAT teams (for example, GIGN has helped French marines arrest Somali pirates).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While technically military the " Gendarmerie Nationale " are n't exactly soldiersThey are , for example , one of about two police forces in the world with a parachute division , and GIGN is more often compared to the SAS than to SWAT teams ( for example , GIGN has helped French marines arrest Somali pirates ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While technically military the "Gendarmerie Nationale" aren't exactly soldiersThey are, for example, one of about two police forces in the world with a parachute division, and GIGN is more often compared to the SAS than to SWAT teams (for example, GIGN has helped French marines arrest Somali pirates).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429352</id>
	<title>Re:France: going OSS like the rest of EU but bette</title>
	<author>DigitalContradiction</author>
	<datestamp>1260790020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>As stated in the previous anonymous comment, the code was contributed by the gendarmerie (military police), which is quite tech savvy and has a long history of using and advocating open source solutions. They previously switched all their office software to OpenOffice.org in 2005, and are currently migrating most of their Windows workstations to Ubuntu.

But this effort is not so widespread ; there are both successes (like the budget and public accounting administration recently migrating from Outlook and Notes to Thunderbird and OBM groupware) and failures, like the whole educational field, which is basically a mess. There are some isolated efforts to promote free software and open standards, but due to a lack of strong political willpower, huge lobbying from Microsoft, and general incompetence and disinterest about IT, teachers, students and administrative staff are usually stuck with proprietary (and often obsolete) solutions.

There has been some recent effort to officially define open formats and standards and to enforce their use across the whole French administration (http://www.april.org/fr/rgi), but it was mostly thwarted by Microsoft using some FUD and promoting their pseudo-open OOXML format.


I think we can say that more and more IT people in the French administration are aware than FOSS is a real and worthy alternative, but the battle is far from won.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As stated in the previous anonymous comment , the code was contributed by the gendarmerie ( military police ) , which is quite tech savvy and has a long history of using and advocating open source solutions .
They previously switched all their office software to OpenOffice.org in 2005 , and are currently migrating most of their Windows workstations to Ubuntu .
But this effort is not so widespread ; there are both successes ( like the budget and public accounting administration recently migrating from Outlook and Notes to Thunderbird and OBM groupware ) and failures , like the whole educational field , which is basically a mess .
There are some isolated efforts to promote free software and open standards , but due to a lack of strong political willpower , huge lobbying from Microsoft , and general incompetence and disinterest about IT , teachers , students and administrative staff are usually stuck with proprietary ( and often obsolete ) solutions .
There has been some recent effort to officially define open formats and standards and to enforce their use across the whole French administration ( http : //www.april.org/fr/rgi ) , but it was mostly thwarted by Microsoft using some FUD and promoting their pseudo-open OOXML format .
I think we can say that more and more IT people in the French administration are aware than FOSS is a real and worthy alternative , but the battle is far from won .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As stated in the previous anonymous comment, the code was contributed by the gendarmerie (military police), which is quite tech savvy and has a long history of using and advocating open source solutions.
They previously switched all their office software to OpenOffice.org in 2005, and are currently migrating most of their Windows workstations to Ubuntu.
But this effort is not so widespread ; there are both successes (like the budget and public accounting administration recently migrating from Outlook and Notes to Thunderbird and OBM groupware) and failures, like the whole educational field, which is basically a mess.
There are some isolated efforts to promote free software and open standards, but due to a lack of strong political willpower, huge lobbying from Microsoft, and general incompetence and disinterest about IT, teachers, students and administrative staff are usually stuck with proprietary (and often obsolete) solutions.
There has been some recent effort to officially define open formats and standards and to enforce their use across the whole French administration (http://www.april.org/fr/rgi), but it was mostly thwarted by Microsoft using some FUD and promoting their pseudo-open OOXML format.
I think we can say that more and more IT people in the French administration are aware than FOSS is a real and worthy alternative, but the battle is far from won.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428978</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Muggy7</author>
	<datestamp>1260783540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey cool, now I can mark individual messages with a white flag</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey cool , now I can mark individual messages with a white flag</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey cool, now I can mark individual messages with a white flag</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427698</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260722460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, you don't hear many jokes about Poland, The Netherlands or Belgium being invaded by the Germans. Perhaps the French history as a great nation and the cultural arrogance that comes from that makes them more of a valid target to joke about.</p><p>But with that said: the French were absolutely right about standing up to Bush against an unnecessary war. All they had to do was commit a symbolic number of troops to "fight" in some relatively peaceful outback region like other countries did. If only more people stood up to the false claims...</p><p>Now, years later, we know that the primary achievement of the whole Iraq war effort has been to transform their country from a secular dictatorship to a theocratic dictatorship. This at the mere cost of hundreds of billions of dollars, thousands of US military lives and tens of thousands of civilian lives.</p><p>So much for them Freedom Fries, eh...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , you do n't hear many jokes about Poland , The Netherlands or Belgium being invaded by the Germans .
Perhaps the French history as a great nation and the cultural arrogance that comes from that makes them more of a valid target to joke about.But with that said : the French were absolutely right about standing up to Bush against an unnecessary war .
All they had to do was commit a symbolic number of troops to " fight " in some relatively peaceful outback region like other countries did .
If only more people stood up to the false claims...Now , years later , we know that the primary achievement of the whole Iraq war effort has been to transform their country from a secular dictatorship to a theocratic dictatorship .
This at the mere cost of hundreds of billions of dollars , thousands of US military lives and tens of thousands of civilian lives.So much for them Freedom Fries , eh.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, you don't hear many jokes about Poland, The Netherlands or Belgium being invaded by the Germans.
Perhaps the French history as a great nation and the cultural arrogance that comes from that makes them more of a valid target to joke about.But with that said: the French were absolutely right about standing up to Bush against an unnecessary war.
All they had to do was commit a symbolic number of troops to "fight" in some relatively peaceful outback region like other countries did.
If only more people stood up to the false claims...Now, years later, we know that the primary achievement of the whole Iraq war effort has been to transform their country from a secular dictatorship to a theocratic dictatorship.
This at the mere cost of hundreds of billions of dollars, thousands of US military lives and tens of thousands of civilian lives.So much for them Freedom Fries, eh...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428242</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Johann Lau</author>
	<datestamp>1260728820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The same people that make the surrender jokes will often make fun of their own nation just as quickly."</p><p>Bold claim, backed up by NOTHING, followed by insults. Anonymous, no less. Why does that not surprise?</p><p>But while we're at it: what is "just a joke"? What meanings and functions can a joke have, which do apply here? "It's just a joke, shut up now" is just a feeble attempt by weak intellects to shut down any pondering/discussion of that.</p><p>Specific members of the French military contributed specific code to Thunderbird -- what does FRANCE have to do with it? And no, I'm neither French nor would I care if be insulted and utterly outraged (LOL) if I was - I just think it's apeish and fucking lame, not to mention predictable and utterly boring to anyone except the "oooo-raaahhhh" crowd... which to me is the main function of such "mere jokes", <b>they serve as a glue for people with common cognitive defects</b>. It's not even dissing France or anything French, it's simply a signal flare saying "Idiot here, where are my idiots at?"</p><p>Someone pointing that out is doing you a favour actually. Do with it what you will.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The same people that make the surrender jokes will often make fun of their own nation just as quickly .
" Bold claim , backed up by NOTHING , followed by insults .
Anonymous , no less .
Why does that not surprise ? But while we 're at it : what is " just a joke " ?
What meanings and functions can a joke have , which do apply here ?
" It 's just a joke , shut up now " is just a feeble attempt by weak intellects to shut down any pondering/discussion of that.Specific members of the French military contributed specific code to Thunderbird -- what does FRANCE have to do with it ?
And no , I 'm neither French nor would I care if be insulted and utterly outraged ( LOL ) if I was - I just think it 's apeish and fucking lame , not to mention predictable and utterly boring to anyone except the " oooo-raaahhhh " crowd... which to me is the main function of such " mere jokes " , they serve as a glue for people with common cognitive defects .
It 's not even dissing France or anything French , it 's simply a signal flare saying " Idiot here , where are my idiots at ?
" Someone pointing that out is doing you a favour actually .
Do with it what you will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The same people that make the surrender jokes will often make fun of their own nation just as quickly.
"Bold claim, backed up by NOTHING, followed by insults.
Anonymous, no less.
Why does that not surprise?But while we're at it: what is "just a joke"?
What meanings and functions can a joke have, which do apply here?
"It's just a joke, shut up now" is just a feeble attempt by weak intellects to shut down any pondering/discussion of that.Specific members of the French military contributed specific code to Thunderbird -- what does FRANCE have to do with it?
And no, I'm neither French nor would I care if be insulted and utterly outraged (LOL) if I was - I just think it's apeish and fucking lame, not to mention predictable and utterly boring to anyone except the "oooo-raaahhhh" crowd... which to me is the main function of such "mere jokes", they serve as a glue for people with common cognitive defects.
It's not even dissing France or anything French, it's simply a signal flare saying "Idiot here, where are my idiots at?
"Someone pointing that out is doing you a favour actually.
Do with it what you will.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428758</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>henrik.falk</author>
	<datestamp>1260823740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You might want to know that the French don't consider these "jokes" funny.
The fact that Americans don't seem to understand that, is astonishing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You might want to know that the French do n't consider these " jokes " funny .
The fact that Americans do n't seem to understand that , is astonishing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might want to know that the French don't consider these "jokes" funny.
The fact that Americans don't seem to understand that, is astonishing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430928</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1260805800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now, years later, we know that the primary achievement of the whole Iraq war effort has been to transform their country from a secular dictatorship to a theocratic dictatorship.</p></div><p>That's a bit of an overstatement -- and this is coming from somebody who protested that war from *before* the congressional authorization vote.</p><p>Our big problem going into Iraq were unexamined, and often *unspoken* assumptions that were believed because they were convenient for a certain ideology's supporters.  Making the same kind of assumptions in support of a contrary ideology is not a cure for that madness.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , years later , we know that the primary achievement of the whole Iraq war effort has been to transform their country from a secular dictatorship to a theocratic dictatorship.That 's a bit of an overstatement -- and this is coming from somebody who protested that war from * before * the congressional authorization vote.Our big problem going into Iraq were unexamined , and often * unspoken * assumptions that were believed because they were convenient for a certain ideology 's supporters .
Making the same kind of assumptions in support of a contrary ideology is not a cure for that madness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, years later, we know that the primary achievement of the whole Iraq war effort has been to transform their country from a secular dictatorship to a theocratic dictatorship.That's a bit of an overstatement -- and this is coming from somebody who protested that war from *before* the congressional authorization vote.Our big problem going into Iraq were unexamined, and often *unspoken* assumptions that were believed because they were convenient for a certain ideology's supporters.
Making the same kind of assumptions in support of a contrary ideology is not a cure for that madness.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428018</id>
	<title>Re:How About a Plain Text Mode?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260726000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You already can set Thunderbird to run operate only in text mode (for 2.0 at least).</p><p>ToolBar -&gt; view -&gt; message body as -&gt; Plain Text</p><p>+</p><p>Tools -&gt; Options -&gt; composition -&gt; General -&gt; Send Options -&gt; Text Format = Convert the message to plain text<br>(or = Send the message in both plain text and HTML)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You already can set Thunderbird to run operate only in text mode ( for 2.0 at least ) .ToolBar - &gt; view - &gt; message body as - &gt; Plain Text + Tools - &gt; Options - &gt; composition - &gt; General - &gt; Send Options - &gt; Text Format = Convert the message to plain text ( or = Send the message in both plain text and HTML )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You already can set Thunderbird to run operate only in text mode (for 2.0 at least).ToolBar -&gt; view -&gt; message body as -&gt; Plain Text+Tools -&gt; Options -&gt; composition -&gt; General -&gt; Send Options -&gt; Text Format = Convert the message to plain text(or = Send the message in both plain text and HTML)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30434360</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>AmigaMMC</author>
	<datestamp>1260822360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The British always say whatever the Americans say. Look at Iran and Afghanistan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The British always say whatever the Americans say .
Look at Iran and Afghanistan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The British always say whatever the Americans say.
Look at Iran and Afghanistan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30440004</id>
	<title>Re:Choice of Commandos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260808800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Duh, of course.</p><p>No one knows where it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Duh , of course.No one knows where it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Duh, of course.No one knows where it is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30441796</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260871860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not french, I'm Polish and I'll laugh at whoever the fuck I want to.</p><p>No really the funny part is that I'm just Polish/American, which is like one/eighth or something like that. Anyways, yeah I know dubya's war kinda sucked/s and all I really did my best to bitch about it as much as possible. But, shit. I don't know where this bus is going I'm just along for the ride. That said I'd like to let you know that I have NEVER once in my life - eaten a goddamn freedom fry. So when I say that I thought the little round of jokes was funny I can assure you that it's not because I particularily am pissed off at them for not going to war.</p><p>OTOH - I know I'm rude and my ex-wife is French, so I may be an ingrate as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not french , I 'm Polish and I 'll laugh at whoever the fuck I want to.No really the funny part is that I 'm just Polish/American , which is like one/eighth or something like that .
Anyways , yeah I know dubya 's war kinda sucked/s and all I really did my best to bitch about it as much as possible .
But , shit .
I do n't know where this bus is going I 'm just along for the ride .
That said I 'd like to let you know that I have NEVER once in my life - eaten a goddamn freedom fry .
So when I say that I thought the little round of jokes was funny I can assure you that it 's not because I particularily am pissed off at them for not going to war.OTOH - I know I 'm rude and my ex-wife is French , so I may be an ingrate as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not french, I'm Polish and I'll laugh at whoever the fuck I want to.No really the funny part is that I'm just Polish/American, which is like one/eighth or something like that.
Anyways, yeah I know dubya's war kinda sucked/s and all I really did my best to bitch about it as much as possible.
But, shit.
I don't know where this bus is going I'm just along for the ride.
That said I'd like to let you know that I have NEVER once in my life - eaten a goddamn freedom fry.
So when I say that I thought the little round of jokes was funny I can assure you that it's not because I particularily am pissed off at them for not going to war.OTOH - I know I'm rude and my ex-wife is French, so I may be an ingrate as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430122</id>
	<title>Re:French thunderbirds rock</title>
	<author>jsoderba</author>
	<datestamp>1260800760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Firefox UI is completely skinnable and there are skins on addons.mozilla.org that make Firefox 3.5 look like pretty much any previous version. Why should Mozilla bother to maintain two separate UIs when the community can do it for them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Firefox UI is completely skinnable and there are skins on addons.mozilla.org that make Firefox 3.5 look like pretty much any previous version .
Why should Mozilla bother to maintain two separate UIs when the community can do it for them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Firefox UI is completely skinnable and there are skins on addons.mozilla.org that make Firefox 3.5 look like pretty much any previous version.
Why should Mozilla bother to maintain two separate UIs when the community can do it for them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427726</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>HeronBlademaster</author>
	<datestamp>1260722760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... except the two dozen "surrender" jokes <i>above</i> your parent post suggest otherwise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... except the two dozen " surrender " jokes above your parent post suggest otherwise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... except the two dozen "surrender" jokes above your parent post suggest otherwise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30432366</id>
	<title>obligatory</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1260812640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You must be new here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be new here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be new here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</id>
	<title>Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260720960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If there is one thing that is certain in this world, its that if someone says "The French" or "France" within hearing of any US Citizen, the immediate response will be an endless string of "Surrender" or "SurrenderMonkey" Jokes.</p><p>Caveat: I am not French just to clarify that. I am (English) Canadian, and I don't even particularly like the French myself.</p><p>It gets awfully tiring to be reminded of just how fucking bigotted the US is in this way. You should get over yourselves already.<br>Yes, the French got their asses kicked in WWII, whatever. Any nation invaded by Germany at that time would have suffered the same fate (and many of them did). You got your asses kicked in Vietnam, even if you don't want to admit it. You pulled your forces out before anyone had to surrender of course.</p><p>All these jokes serve to accomplish is to remind me just how fucking ignorant, narrow minded, bigotted and offensive the US can be at times. They make you look like nothing more than a nation of assholes. Then you wonder why the peoples of many other nations find Americans offensive.</p><p>Of course none of you seem to have enough education or enough wit to recall that during the Napoleonic period, France was the most respected and feared nation on earth. They conquered pretty much all of Europe and it took the combined might of England, The Austro-Hungarian Empire, Prussia, Russia and others to eventually defeat them after 20 years of warfare. At that point in time the US couldn't even carry out a successful invasion of Canada, and we (as the British) burnt the White House in response.</p><p>I for one would like to see this fucking "meme" be laid to rest. It was always present but seems to have been resurrected when the French decided not to commit forces to the first Gulf War (because it wasn't authorized by the UN I believe).</p><p>Now, queue all the responses from people calling me a "liberal", "faggot", "commie", "pinko" etc, because I criticized the US (I am none of those things by the way). What I am, is tired of seeing US citizens act like a bunch of fucking ignorant assholes, and then wondering why people think they are a bunch of fucking ignorant assholes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p><p>Yes, yes I have met many very decent and nice Americans, they just don't seem to post in response to their fellow citizens offensive shit that crops up like this every few days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If there is one thing that is certain in this world , its that if someone says " The French " or " France " within hearing of any US Citizen , the immediate response will be an endless string of " Surrender " or " SurrenderMonkey " Jokes.Caveat : I am not French just to clarify that .
I am ( English ) Canadian , and I do n't even particularly like the French myself.It gets awfully tiring to be reminded of just how fucking bigotted the US is in this way .
You should get over yourselves already.Yes , the French got their asses kicked in WWII , whatever .
Any nation invaded by Germany at that time would have suffered the same fate ( and many of them did ) .
You got your asses kicked in Vietnam , even if you do n't want to admit it .
You pulled your forces out before anyone had to surrender of course.All these jokes serve to accomplish is to remind me just how fucking ignorant , narrow minded , bigotted and offensive the US can be at times .
They make you look like nothing more than a nation of assholes .
Then you wonder why the peoples of many other nations find Americans offensive.Of course none of you seem to have enough education or enough wit to recall that during the Napoleonic period , France was the most respected and feared nation on earth .
They conquered pretty much all of Europe and it took the combined might of England , The Austro-Hungarian Empire , Prussia , Russia and others to eventually defeat them after 20 years of warfare .
At that point in time the US could n't even carry out a successful invasion of Canada , and we ( as the British ) burnt the White House in response.I for one would like to see this fucking " meme " be laid to rest .
It was always present but seems to have been resurrected when the French decided not to commit forces to the first Gulf War ( because it was n't authorized by the UN I believe ) .Now , queue all the responses from people calling me a " liberal " , " faggot " , " commie " , " pinko " etc , because I criticized the US ( I am none of those things by the way ) .
What I am , is tired of seeing US citizens act like a bunch of fucking ignorant assholes , and then wondering why people think they are a bunch of fucking ignorant assholes : PYes , yes I have met many very decent and nice Americans , they just do n't seem to post in response to their fellow citizens offensive shit that crops up like this every few days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there is one thing that is certain in this world, its that if someone says "The French" or "France" within hearing of any US Citizen, the immediate response will be an endless string of "Surrender" or "SurrenderMonkey" Jokes.Caveat: I am not French just to clarify that.
I am (English) Canadian, and I don't even particularly like the French myself.It gets awfully tiring to be reminded of just how fucking bigotted the US is in this way.
You should get over yourselves already.Yes, the French got their asses kicked in WWII, whatever.
Any nation invaded by Germany at that time would have suffered the same fate (and many of them did).
You got your asses kicked in Vietnam, even if you don't want to admit it.
You pulled your forces out before anyone had to surrender of course.All these jokes serve to accomplish is to remind me just how fucking ignorant, narrow minded, bigotted and offensive the US can be at times.
They make you look like nothing more than a nation of assholes.
Then you wonder why the peoples of many other nations find Americans offensive.Of course none of you seem to have enough education or enough wit to recall that during the Napoleonic period, France was the most respected and feared nation on earth.
They conquered pretty much all of Europe and it took the combined might of England, The Austro-Hungarian Empire, Prussia, Russia and others to eventually defeat them after 20 years of warfare.
At that point in time the US couldn't even carry out a successful invasion of Canada, and we (as the British) burnt the White House in response.I for one would like to see this fucking "meme" be laid to rest.
It was always present but seems to have been resurrected when the French decided not to commit forces to the first Gulf War (because it wasn't authorized by the UN I believe).Now, queue all the responses from people calling me a "liberal", "faggot", "commie", "pinko" etc, because I criticized the US (I am none of those things by the way).
What I am, is tired of seeing US citizens act like a bunch of fucking ignorant assholes, and then wondering why people think they are a bunch of fucking ignorant assholes :PYes, yes I have met many very decent and nice Americans, they just don't seem to post in response to their fellow citizens offensive shit that crops up like this every few days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429300</id>
	<title>Re:Continuing the naming tradition</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260789180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shouldn't it be Singecapitulard?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't it be Singecapitulard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't it be Singecapitulard?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429346</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>bipbop</author>
	<datestamp>1260789960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Note to non-Americans who managed to read the entire above post:  Yeah, lots of us are assholes.  But we're not all like this guy.  Really.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Note to non-Americans who managed to read the entire above post : Yeah , lots of us are assholes .
But we 're not all like this guy .
Really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Note to non-Americans who managed to read the entire above post:  Yeah, lots of us are assholes.
But we're not all like this guy.
Really.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430316</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>SeaFox</author>
	<datestamp>1260802320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It is a bit strong for Americans to accuse the French of being cowards considering that USA never gets involved in a war that you don't are completely and massively military superior in.</p></div></blockquote><p>* The Pacific Theater of WWII wasn't exactly a cakewalk before we developed nuclear weapons.<br>* Many people here consider Vietnam a war we lost.</p><blockquote><div><p>USA wouldn't know anything about fighting such a war where you risk losing your country.</p></div></blockquote><p>Well ignoring that little scuffle known as <i>the American Civil War</i>, It's not like we've been given a multitude of opportunities to find out. Is it our fault nobody has tried to start a war on our own soil? (I guess so. Damn us for seeking peace treaties with our near neighbors and defending ourselves too well; dissuading others from invading). I could easily phrase your statement as "the majority of wars Americans have gone to are not ones they really needed to get involved in to start with."</p><p>Yeah. America: Going out looking for a fight (they're real cowards).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a bit strong for Americans to accuse the French of being cowards considering that USA never gets involved in a war that you do n't are completely and massively military superior in .
* The Pacific Theater of WWII was n't exactly a cakewalk before we developed nuclear weapons .
* Many people here consider Vietnam a war we lost.USA would n't know anything about fighting such a war where you risk losing your country.Well ignoring that little scuffle known as the American Civil War , It 's not like we 've been given a multitude of opportunities to find out .
Is it our fault nobody has tried to start a war on our own soil ?
( I guess so .
Damn us for seeking peace treaties with our near neighbors and defending ourselves too well ; dissuading others from invading ) .
I could easily phrase your statement as " the majority of wars Americans have gone to are not ones they really needed to get involved in to start with. " Yeah .
America : Going out looking for a fight ( they 're real cowards ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a bit strong for Americans to accuse the French of being cowards considering that USA never gets involved in a war that you don't are completely and massively military superior in.
* The Pacific Theater of WWII wasn't exactly a cakewalk before we developed nuclear weapons.
* Many people here consider Vietnam a war we lost.USA wouldn't know anything about fighting such a war where you risk losing your country.Well ignoring that little scuffle known as the American Civil War, It's not like we've been given a multitude of opportunities to find out.
Is it our fault nobody has tried to start a war on our own soil?
(I guess so.
Damn us for seeking peace treaties with our near neighbors and defending ourselves too well; dissuading others from invading).
I could easily phrase your statement as "the majority of wars Americans have gone to are not ones they really needed to get involved in to start with."Yeah.
America: Going out looking for a fight (they're real cowards).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430628</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>QuantumRiff</author>
	<datestamp>1260804360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>USA wouldn't know anything about fighting such a war where you risk losing your country.</p></div><p>Cmon, thats a bit harsh...<br>We've lost the war on drugs, the War on poverty, and were working our darndest to lose the war on Terrorism as well!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>USA would n't know anything about fighting such a war where you risk losing your country.Cmon , thats a bit harsh...We 've lost the war on drugs , the War on poverty , and were working our darndest to lose the war on Terrorism as well !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>USA wouldn't know anything about fighting such a war where you risk losing your country.Cmon, thats a bit harsh...We've lost the war on drugs, the War on poverty, and were working our darndest to lose the war on Terrorism as well!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427544</id>
	<title>Thats a very smart move...</title>
	<author>MindPrison</author>
	<datestamp>1260720540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...know the software your enemy is using - then you can know your enemy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...know the software your enemy is using - then you can know your enemy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...know the software your enemy is using - then you can know your enemy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429068</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260785220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>American war of Independence?  War of 1812?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>American war of Independence ?
War of 1812 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>American war of Independence?
War of 1812?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427648</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260721860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NICE TRY. You can't restart a dead meme that easily, especially when the article is positive about France.<br>Mod parent DOWN.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NICE TRY .
You ca n't restart a dead meme that easily , especially when the article is positive about France.Mod parent DOWN .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NICE TRY.
You can't restart a dead meme that easily, especially when the article is positive about France.Mod parent DOWN.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30431442</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260808440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go right ahead, froggy, because then I'll just augment the list with even more factual French failures.</p><p>Just the fact that you replied tells me the list hits home. You know it's true.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go right ahead , froggy , because then I 'll just augment the list with even more factual French failures.Just the fact that you replied tells me the list hits home .
You know it 's true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go right ahead, froggy, because then I'll just augment the list with even more factual French failures.Just the fact that you replied tells me the list hits home.
You know it's true.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428214</id>
	<title>'best in the world, no exception'</title>
	<author>shis-ka-bob</author>
	<datestamp>1260728340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a ridiculous statement.  There is no country that is best in everything, just like there is no athlete that is best at everything.  The United States may excel at personal liberties, but the French are clearly better at Egality, and probably Fraternity.  French healthcare is excellent - I had children born in the US and France, and I strongly prefer the French system.  US doctors have offices that look like advertisements for drug companies and doctors offices are almost always centered around clerks that file insurance.  French doctors have simpler offices with far fewer assistants, and those assistances are more likely to be medical staff than clerks.  I want a medical system that spends money on medical, not bureaucracies.  We in the use have a medical system that is collapsing under its own weight.
<p>
As to the Napoleonic Era, it is important to point out that they were the first European power to establish a Republic free of a Monarch.  They were also trying to form democratic institutions on a continent dominated by Monarchs that wanted nothing more than to see France's attempt fail.  We in the US were under the Articles of Confederation from November 1777 to June 21, 1788.  Cornwall surrendered on October, 1781.  So we had over six years to work on democratic institutions under relatively peaceful conditions.  But the French fleet continued to combat the British in the West Indies.  There was also the Fourth Anglo-Dutch War (1780-1784) that was sparked by the American Revolution.  All of this made the Treaty of Paris a rather complicated affair.  But as a result of their rather expensive support of our revolution, the French government was under great financial hardship.  This was one of the lead-ups to the French Revolution, which began on 14 July 1789 with the storming of the Bastille.  By 1792, the French were in wars with Austria and Prussia at a time when their government and armies were disintegrating.  By 9 November 1788, Napoleon had seized power.
</p><p>
So in our first decade, we gained significant allies and were able to deliberate on forming The Constitution, which is a truly remarkable document.  In contrast, France's first decade faced powerful enemies, the Reign of Terror and the ascent of Napoleon.  Relatively speaking, we had it easy.
</p><p>
Americans don't recognize the absolute genius of Napoleon.  In addition to being one of the finest military commanders in history, he also established the Napoleonic Code.  Frankly, the Napoleonic Code is a far more rational basis for a legal system than British Common Law.  He also advanced the fledgling &#201;cole Polytechnique, which is still one of the finest technical universities in the world - certainly a peer of MIT or CalTech.  He also advanced their banking system and post office.
</p><p>
I do not state that I would rather be French than American, but calling someone an 'ignorant, America-hating asshole that seems to be so pissed off because the US makes the rules for world' is just stupid.  Learn about the rest of the world.  Take what is best and synthesis something even better.  We can use the French model to evolve and the French can use the American model to evolve.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a ridiculous statement .
There is no country that is best in everything , just like there is no athlete that is best at everything .
The United States may excel at personal liberties , but the French are clearly better at Egality , and probably Fraternity .
French healthcare is excellent - I had children born in the US and France , and I strongly prefer the French system .
US doctors have offices that look like advertisements for drug companies and doctors offices are almost always centered around clerks that file insurance .
French doctors have simpler offices with far fewer assistants , and those assistances are more likely to be medical staff than clerks .
I want a medical system that spends money on medical , not bureaucracies .
We in the use have a medical system that is collapsing under its own weight .
As to the Napoleonic Era , it is important to point out that they were the first European power to establish a Republic free of a Monarch .
They were also trying to form democratic institutions on a continent dominated by Monarchs that wanted nothing more than to see France 's attempt fail .
We in the US were under the Articles of Confederation from November 1777 to June 21 , 1788 .
Cornwall surrendered on October , 1781 .
So we had over six years to work on democratic institutions under relatively peaceful conditions .
But the French fleet continued to combat the British in the West Indies .
There was also the Fourth Anglo-Dutch War ( 1780-1784 ) that was sparked by the American Revolution .
All of this made the Treaty of Paris a rather complicated affair .
But as a result of their rather expensive support of our revolution , the French government was under great financial hardship .
This was one of the lead-ups to the French Revolution , which began on 14 July 1789 with the storming of the Bastille .
By 1792 , the French were in wars with Austria and Prussia at a time when their government and armies were disintegrating .
By 9 November 1788 , Napoleon had seized power .
So in our first decade , we gained significant allies and were able to deliberate on forming The Constitution , which is a truly remarkable document .
In contrast , France 's first decade faced powerful enemies , the Reign of Terror and the ascent of Napoleon .
Relatively speaking , we had it easy .
Americans do n't recognize the absolute genius of Napoleon .
In addition to being one of the finest military commanders in history , he also established the Napoleonic Code .
Frankly , the Napoleonic Code is a far more rational basis for a legal system than British Common Law .
He also advanced the fledgling   cole Polytechnique , which is still one of the finest technical universities in the world - certainly a peer of MIT or CalTech .
He also advanced their banking system and post office .
I do not state that I would rather be French than American , but calling someone an 'ignorant , America-hating asshole that seems to be so pissed off because the US makes the rules for world ' is just stupid .
Learn about the rest of the world .
Take what is best and synthesis something even better .
We can use the French model to evolve and the French can use the American model to evolve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a ridiculous statement.
There is no country that is best in everything, just like there is no athlete that is best at everything.
The United States may excel at personal liberties, but the French are clearly better at Egality, and probably Fraternity.
French healthcare is excellent - I had children born in the US and France, and I strongly prefer the French system.
US doctors have offices that look like advertisements for drug companies and doctors offices are almost always centered around clerks that file insurance.
French doctors have simpler offices with far fewer assistants, and those assistances are more likely to be medical staff than clerks.
I want a medical system that spends money on medical, not bureaucracies.
We in the use have a medical system that is collapsing under its own weight.
As to the Napoleonic Era, it is important to point out that they were the first European power to establish a Republic free of a Monarch.
They were also trying to form democratic institutions on a continent dominated by Monarchs that wanted nothing more than to see France's attempt fail.
We in the US were under the Articles of Confederation from November 1777 to June 21, 1788.
Cornwall surrendered on October, 1781.
So we had over six years to work on democratic institutions under relatively peaceful conditions.
But the French fleet continued to combat the British in the West Indies.
There was also the Fourth Anglo-Dutch War (1780-1784) that was sparked by the American Revolution.
All of this made the Treaty of Paris a rather complicated affair.
But as a result of their rather expensive support of our revolution, the French government was under great financial hardship.
This was one of the lead-ups to the French Revolution, which began on 14 July 1789 with the storming of the Bastille.
By 1792, the French were in wars with Austria and Prussia at a time when their government and armies were disintegrating.
By 9 November 1788, Napoleon had seized power.
So in our first decade, we gained significant allies and were able to deliberate on forming The Constitution, which is a truly remarkable document.
In contrast, France's first decade faced powerful enemies, the Reign of Terror and the ascent of Napoleon.
Relatively speaking, we had it easy.
Americans don't recognize the absolute genius of Napoleon.
In addition to being one of the finest military commanders in history, he also established the Napoleonic Code.
Frankly, the Napoleonic Code is a far more rational basis for a legal system than British Common Law.
He also advanced the fledgling École Polytechnique, which is still one of the finest technical universities in the world - certainly a peer of MIT or CalTech.
He also advanced their banking system and post office.
I do not state that I would rather be French than American, but calling someone an 'ignorant, America-hating asshole that seems to be so pissed off because the US makes the rules for world' is just stupid.
Learn about the rest of the world.
Take what is best and synthesis something even better.
We can use the French model to evolve and the French can use the American model to evolve.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427346</id>
	<title>Outlooks looks bad.... for outlook</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260718320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>yay Thunderbird</p><p>about time someone stood up to outlook</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First : ) yay Thunderbirdabout time someone stood up to outlook</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First :)yay Thunderbirdabout time someone stood up to outlook</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427856</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260724080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) Canadians make just as many jokes at the expense of the French as Americans do (I've lived in both countries and have heard it with my own ears)<br>2) I suggest you go here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf\_War#UN\_resolution and read up on the bucket load of resolutions passed by the UN authorizing actions taken during the first Gulf War<br>3) Stop being such a cliched Canadian, the US isn't to blame for everything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) Canadians make just as many jokes at the expense of the French as Americans do ( I 've lived in both countries and have heard it with my own ears ) 2 ) I suggest you go here http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf \ _War # UN \ _resolution and read up on the bucket load of resolutions passed by the UN authorizing actions taken during the first Gulf War3 ) Stop being such a cliched Canadian , the US is n't to blame for everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) Canadians make just as many jokes at the expense of the French as Americans do (I've lived in both countries and have heard it with my own ears)2) I suggest you go here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf\_War#UN\_resolution and read up on the bucket load of resolutions passed by the UN authorizing actions taken during the first Gulf War3) Stop being such a cliched Canadian, the US isn't to blame for everything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428326</id>
	<title>Choice of Commandos</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1260730020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I've never heard of TrustedBird before this, but it seems a WHOLE lot more secure than Outlook is.</p></div></blockquote><p>That's not saying much.<br>Britney Spears underwear is a lot more secure than Outlook.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never heard of TrustedBird before this , but it seems a WHOLE lot more secure than Outlook is.That 's not saying much.Britney Spears underwear is a lot more secure than Outlook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never heard of TrustedBird before this, but it seems a WHOLE lot more secure than Outlook is.That's not saying much.Britney Spears underwear is a lot more secure than Outlook.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428362</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>colinrichardday</author>
	<datestamp>1260730560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Well, you don't hear many jokes about Poland, The Netherlands or Belgium being invaded by the Germans. Perhaps the French history as a great nation and the cultural arrogance that comes from that makes them more of a valid target to joke about.</i></p><p>Of course, neither the Dutch nor the Poles actually surrendered during WWII, as their governments fled to Britain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , you do n't hear many jokes about Poland , The Netherlands or Belgium being invaded by the Germans .
Perhaps the French history as a great nation and the cultural arrogance that comes from that makes them more of a valid target to joke about.Of course , neither the Dutch nor the Poles actually surrendered during WWII , as their governments fled to Britain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, you don't hear many jokes about Poland, The Netherlands or Belgium being invaded by the Germans.
Perhaps the French history as a great nation and the cultural arrogance that comes from that makes them more of a valid target to joke about.Of course, neither the Dutch nor the Poles actually surrendered during WWII, as their governments fled to Britain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427462</id>
	<title>Continuing the naming tradition</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260719520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TraceMonkey, SeaMonkey... SurrenderMonkey?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TraceMonkey , SeaMonkey... SurrenderMonkey ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TraceMonkey, SeaMonkey... SurrenderMonkey?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429332</id>
	<title>Re:French thunderbirds rock</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260789780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7a1\_1172944648&amp;o=1" title="liveleak.com" rel="nofollow">French Mirages</a> [liveleak.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>French Mirages [ liveleak.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>French Mirages [liveleak.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430584</id>
	<title>I think the closer you were, the less you joke</title>
	<author>fantomas</author>
	<datestamp>1260804180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some folk in the UK make surrender jokes, but on the whole they don't go down too well. We're well aware that we were 25 miles away from being invaded ourselves and it was a close run thing. You walk round the UK now and still see bomb damage from then. We have relatives who have personal frightening memories of the time. We're very aware that the French fought before losing their country and fought incredibly bravely even after losing their country. We know French people carried out acts of incredible bravery to shelter our airmen and others from being captured and helped get them back home and risked their lives and torture to resist the occupation.</p><p>My theory is that the further a place was from a war, the easier it is to be ill-educated and insensitive about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some folk in the UK make surrender jokes , but on the whole they do n't go down too well .
We 're well aware that we were 25 miles away from being invaded ourselves and it was a close run thing .
You walk round the UK now and still see bomb damage from then .
We have relatives who have personal frightening memories of the time .
We 're very aware that the French fought before losing their country and fought incredibly bravely even after losing their country .
We know French people carried out acts of incredible bravery to shelter our airmen and others from being captured and helped get them back home and risked their lives and torture to resist the occupation.My theory is that the further a place was from a war , the easier it is to be ill-educated and insensitive about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some folk in the UK make surrender jokes, but on the whole they don't go down too well.
We're well aware that we were 25 miles away from being invaded ourselves and it was a close run thing.
You walk round the UK now and still see bomb damage from then.
We have relatives who have personal frightening memories of the time.
We're very aware that the French fought before losing their country and fought incredibly bravely even after losing their country.
We know French people carried out acts of incredible bravery to shelter our airmen and others from being captured and helped get them back home and risked their lives and torture to resist the occupation.My theory is that the further a place was from a war, the easier it is to be ill-educated and insensitive about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30496400</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261155840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Well, you don't hear many jokes about Poland, The Netherlands or Belgium being invaded by the Germans. Perhaps the French history as a great nation and the cultural arrogance that comes from that makes them more of a valid target to joke about.</p></div><p>You've honestly never heard a Polack joke before?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , you do n't hear many jokes about Poland , The Netherlands or Belgium being invaded by the Germans .
Perhaps the French history as a great nation and the cultural arrogance that comes from that makes them more of a valid target to joke about.You 've honestly never heard a Polack joke before ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, you don't hear many jokes about Poland, The Netherlands or Belgium being invaded by the Germans.
Perhaps the French history as a great nation and the cultural arrogance that comes from that makes them more of a valid target to joke about.You've honestly never heard a Polack joke before?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430266</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260801900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem is not the joke. It's that *any* topic about France will have more of these jokes than actual discussion about the topic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is not the joke .
It 's that * any * topic about France will have more of these jokes than actual discussion about the topic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is not the joke.
It's that *any* topic about France will have more of these jokes than actual discussion about the topic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427734</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>thuerrsch</author>
	<datestamp>1260722760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> I don't even particularly like the French myself.</p></div><p>So I guess you know every single one of them personally? Because if not, this statement would be chauvinist, maybe even racist. Which would make it only the worst part of a largely pointless rant.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't even particularly like the French myself.So I guess you know every single one of them personally ?
Because if not , this statement would be chauvinist , maybe even racist .
Which would make it only the worst part of a largely pointless rant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I don't even particularly like the French myself.So I guess you know every single one of them personally?
Because if not, this statement would be chauvinist, maybe even racist.
Which would make it only the worst part of a largely pointless rant.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427516</id>
	<title>France:  going OSS like the rest of EU but better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260720300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The French Government really seem to get the hang of OSS every depeartment seems focused on using OSS like their entire justice department going ubuntu <a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/french-police-saves-millions-of-euros-by-adopting-ubuntu.ars" title="arstechnica.com" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/french-police-saves-millions-of-euros-by-adopting-ubuntu.ars</a> [arstechnica.com] and unlike the Germans(+1 million failed projects) or Dutch(going Microsoft everywhere despite promises and even laws(!) to go open source)  etc they actually seem to be making progress</htmltext>
<tokenext>The French Government really seem to get the hang of OSS every depeartment seems focused on using OSS like their entire justice department going ubuntu http : //arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/french-police-saves-millions-of-euros-by-adopting-ubuntu.ars [ arstechnica.com ] and unlike the Germans ( + 1 million failed projects ) or Dutch ( going Microsoft everywhere despite promises and even laws ( !
) to go open source ) etc they actually seem to be making progress</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The French Government really seem to get the hang of OSS every depeartment seems focused on using OSS like their entire justice department going ubuntu http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/french-police-saves-millions-of-euros-by-adopting-ubuntu.ars [arstechnica.com] and unlike the Germans(+1 million failed projects) or Dutch(going Microsoft everywhere despite promises and even laws(!
) to go open source)  etc they actually seem to be making progress</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427710</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260722460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, and you're an idiot. The biggest reason the French suck is because they had the right, the obligation, the duty, to prevent the Germans from building up their military after WWI, and they gave in, they failed, they surrendered. Every death in WWII, including millions of Jews and Russians, can be laid at the feet of the French for failing to live up to the terms of the Treaty of Versailles which gave them the right to march into Germany at any point they desired and smack them down. But the french were afraid, and thus were key to making WWII happen by their inaction.</p><p>Then, of course, there's this fact: "There has rarely been a war in which France did not surrender or win with the help of making allies with another country that would do all the work for them."<br><a href="http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/u/u/uup101/France.htm" title="psu.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/u/u/uup101/France.htm</a> [psu.edu]</p><p>The meme won't die because it's based in historical fact. Sure, France helped the US out mightily during the Revolution--but not due to any great purpose or charity, only to hurt the British. And there's no one more smug, more racist, that I know of than the French.</p><p>The french are wussy surrender-monkeys and smug bastards. I'm sure it won't be long now before the french give in to the muslim elements in their society and become the first muslim european state.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , and you 're an idiot .
The biggest reason the French suck is because they had the right , the obligation , the duty , to prevent the Germans from building up their military after WWI , and they gave in , they failed , they surrendered .
Every death in WWII , including millions of Jews and Russians , can be laid at the feet of the French for failing to live up to the terms of the Treaty of Versailles which gave them the right to march into Germany at any point they desired and smack them down .
But the french were afraid , and thus were key to making WWII happen by their inaction.Then , of course , there 's this fact : " There has rarely been a war in which France did not surrender or win with the help of making allies with another country that would do all the work for them .
" http : //www.personal.psu.edu/users/u/u/uup101/France.htm [ psu.edu ] The meme wo n't die because it 's based in historical fact .
Sure , France helped the US out mightily during the Revolution--but not due to any great purpose or charity , only to hurt the British .
And there 's no one more smug , more racist , that I know of than the French.The french are wussy surrender-monkeys and smug bastards .
I 'm sure it wo n't be long now before the french give in to the muslim elements in their society and become the first muslim european state .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, and you're an idiot.
The biggest reason the French suck is because they had the right, the obligation, the duty, to prevent the Germans from building up their military after WWI, and they gave in, they failed, they surrendered.
Every death in WWII, including millions of Jews and Russians, can be laid at the feet of the French for failing to live up to the terms of the Treaty of Versailles which gave them the right to march into Germany at any point they desired and smack them down.
But the french were afraid, and thus were key to making WWII happen by their inaction.Then, of course, there's this fact: "There has rarely been a war in which France did not surrender or win with the help of making allies with another country that would do all the work for them.
"http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/u/u/uup101/France.htm [psu.edu]The meme won't die because it's based in historical fact.
Sure, France helped the US out mightily during the Revolution--but not due to any great purpose or charity, only to hurt the British.
And there's no one more smug, more racist, that I know of than the French.The french are wussy surrender-monkeys and smug bastards.
I'm sure it won't be long now before the french give in to the muslim elements in their society and become the first muslim european state.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428174</id>
	<title>Naaaah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260727860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The same people that make the surrender jokes will often make fun of their own nation just as quickly.</p></div></blockquote><p>Yeah , but Americans are pretty fucked when it comes to <i>derogatory</i> jokes about them. Like how they are such pussies they can't even go to war unless they pick on a country that can't defend itself against air power - and even then pimply nerds do most of it by remote control.</p><p>The French surrendered against a kind of warfare that had only appeared very shortly before their invasion and then fought a very successful underground campaign against the aggressors, much like the Iraqis have done. Good on them. Beats a bunch of wusses that don't even have the balls to surrender properly to a bunch of midgets in black pajamas when they are licked, despite having all the jets, agent orange and napalm.</p><p>I too know plenty of decent Americans, but this vocal peanut gallery makes me sick, especially this anti-French bullshit. Even Kiwis don't generally hang the same level of shit on them. You guys go on and on because they won't join you in your international armed robbery? Good on them for having some balls, even if they are the stinky cheese ball variety.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The same people that make the surrender jokes will often make fun of their own nation just as quickly.Yeah , but Americans are pretty fucked when it comes to derogatory jokes about them .
Like how they are such pussies they ca n't even go to war unless they pick on a country that ca n't defend itself against air power - and even then pimply nerds do most of it by remote control.The French surrendered against a kind of warfare that had only appeared very shortly before their invasion and then fought a very successful underground campaign against the aggressors , much like the Iraqis have done .
Good on them .
Beats a bunch of wusses that do n't even have the balls to surrender properly to a bunch of midgets in black pajamas when they are licked , despite having all the jets , agent orange and napalm.I too know plenty of decent Americans , but this vocal peanut gallery makes me sick , especially this anti-French bullshit .
Even Kiwis do n't generally hang the same level of shit on them .
You guys go on and on because they wo n't join you in your international armed robbery ?
Good on them for having some balls , even if they are the stinky cheese ball variety .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The same people that make the surrender jokes will often make fun of their own nation just as quickly.Yeah , but Americans are pretty fucked when it comes to derogatory jokes about them.
Like how they are such pussies they can't even go to war unless they pick on a country that can't defend itself against air power - and even then pimply nerds do most of it by remote control.The French surrendered against a kind of warfare that had only appeared very shortly before their invasion and then fought a very successful underground campaign against the aggressors, much like the Iraqis have done.
Good on them.
Beats a bunch of wusses that don't even have the balls to surrender properly to a bunch of midgets in black pajamas when they are licked, despite having all the jets, agent orange and napalm.I too know plenty of decent Americans, but this vocal peanut gallery makes me sick, especially this anti-French bullshit.
Even Kiwis don't generally hang the same level of shit on them.
You guys go on and on because they won't join you in your international armed robbery?
Good on them for having some balls, even if they are the stinky cheese ball variety.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427724</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Cassius Corodes</author>
	<datestamp>1260722700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps somewhat off-topic but I read somewhere that all this French = weak stuff started as allied propaganda to explain why the Nazis managed to beat such a powerful (and it was a world power at the time) country so easily. The thinking (according to this article or whatnot) was to keep up morale after such a disastrous outcome by essentially claiming that any other nation would have managed to fight them off but that the French are weak and gave up without a fight. Naturally the real reason was the blitzkrieg tactics combined with bypassing the majority of the French and English (they too where out in force as well) army by going thru the Ardennes (a forest region that the allies thought was not practical to pass thru). Its worth noting as well that every other European country attacked (including Russia at the start) pretty much collapsed under the blitzkrieg.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps somewhat off-topic but I read somewhere that all this French = weak stuff started as allied propaganda to explain why the Nazis managed to beat such a powerful ( and it was a world power at the time ) country so easily .
The thinking ( according to this article or whatnot ) was to keep up morale after such a disastrous outcome by essentially claiming that any other nation would have managed to fight them off but that the French are weak and gave up without a fight .
Naturally the real reason was the blitzkrieg tactics combined with bypassing the majority of the French and English ( they too where out in force as well ) army by going thru the Ardennes ( a forest region that the allies thought was not practical to pass thru ) .
Its worth noting as well that every other European country attacked ( including Russia at the start ) pretty much collapsed under the blitzkrieg .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps somewhat off-topic but I read somewhere that all this French = weak stuff started as allied propaganda to explain why the Nazis managed to beat such a powerful (and it was a world power at the time) country so easily.
The thinking (according to this article or whatnot) was to keep up morale after such a disastrous outcome by essentially claiming that any other nation would have managed to fight them off but that the French are weak and gave up without a fight.
Naturally the real reason was the blitzkrieg tactics combined with bypassing the majority of the French and English (they too where out in force as well) army by going thru the Ardennes (a forest region that the allies thought was not practical to pass thru).
Its worth noting as well that every other European country attacked (including Russia at the start) pretty much collapsed under the blitzkrieg.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430672</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>10Ghz</author>
	<datestamp>1260804540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yes, it is a bit strong for americans to say that...<br>But the British say the same thing, you know that small country that fought in the same war and that hitler turned his attention to after beating the french?</p></div><p>It's easy to be brave when you have 30-240 kilometers of sea between you and your enemy.... And wasn't it the British Army who ran for their lives in Dunkerque?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , it is a bit strong for americans to say that...But the British say the same thing , you know that small country that fought in the same war and that hitler turned his attention to after beating the french ? It 's easy to be brave when you have 30-240 kilometers of sea between you and your enemy.... And was n't it the British Army who ran for their lives in Dunkerque ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, it is a bit strong for americans to say that...But the British say the same thing, you know that small country that fought in the same war and that hitler turned his attention to after beating the french?It's easy to be brave when you have 30-240 kilometers of sea between you and your enemy.... And wasn't it the British Army who ran for their lives in Dunkerque?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429120</id>
	<title>Re:Military?</title>
	<author>iworm</author>
	<datestamp>1260786360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some are indeed as you describe, but many are what most folks would recognise as "soldiers" - the gendarmes have several divisons, with very different roles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some are indeed as you describe , but many are what most folks would recognise as " soldiers " - the gendarmes have several divisons , with very different roles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some are indeed as you describe, but many are what most folks would recognise as "soldiers" - the gendarmes have several divisons, with very different roles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430178</id>
	<title>Re:Watch patriotic American geeks heads explode</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260801240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What patriotic American geeks?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What patriotic American geeks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What patriotic American geeks?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430336</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>a french</author>
	<datestamp>1260802500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey moron, you confuse battles, wars, rebellions, uprisings and riots in a huge list. We can do the same for all countries steeped in history. Should we make a list of all the American failure to include Draft Riots and the Los Angeles riots of 1992, for example?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey moron , you confuse battles , wars , rebellions , uprisings and riots in a huge list .
We can do the same for all countries steeped in history .
Should we make a list of all the American failure to include Draft Riots and the Los Angeles riots of 1992 , for example ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey moron, you confuse battles, wars, rebellions, uprisings and riots in a huge list.
We can do the same for all countries steeped in history.
Should we make a list of all the American failure to include Draft Riots and the Los Angeles riots of 1992, for example?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429602</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>rve</author>
	<datestamp>1260794040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It is a bit strong for Americans to accuse the French of being cowards considering that USA never gets involved in a war that you don't are completely and massively military superior in. France fought brave and well in WW2 but still lost. USA wouldn't know anything about fighting such a war where you risk losing your country. I guess you know that since you keep repeating that lame meme about France. It was old years ago and now it is just embarrassing so watch.</p><p>/Not French</p><p>&lt;/RantMode&gt;</p></div><p>Actually, they did fight one such war, the civil war, and even today, a century and a half later, that conflict is still an enormously big deal, especially in the south, which was defeated. This makes it all the more annoying that knowing this, they still can't grasp the concept of being defeated. There is no fighting on after your army has been defeated and your country occupied.</p><p>That said, maybe the French fought bravely, but certainly not well in WW2. Fearing a repeat of WW1 where a whole generation of french boys died in the trenches, their army was now heavily fortified and excellently prepared for a repeat of the previous war. As the new war was mobile, they were simply bypassed, surrounded and completely defeated in a matter of weeks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a bit strong for Americans to accuse the French of being cowards considering that USA never gets involved in a war that you do n't are completely and massively military superior in .
France fought brave and well in WW2 but still lost .
USA would n't know anything about fighting such a war where you risk losing your country .
I guess you know that since you keep repeating that lame meme about France .
It was old years ago and now it is just embarrassing so watch./Not FrenchActually , they did fight one such war , the civil war , and even today , a century and a half later , that conflict is still an enormously big deal , especially in the south , which was defeated .
This makes it all the more annoying that knowing this , they still ca n't grasp the concept of being defeated .
There is no fighting on after your army has been defeated and your country occupied.That said , maybe the French fought bravely , but certainly not well in WW2 .
Fearing a repeat of WW1 where a whole generation of french boys died in the trenches , their army was now heavily fortified and excellently prepared for a repeat of the previous war .
As the new war was mobile , they were simply bypassed , surrounded and completely defeated in a matter of weeks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a bit strong for Americans to accuse the French of being cowards considering that USA never gets involved in a war that you don't are completely and massively military superior in.
France fought brave and well in WW2 but still lost.
USA wouldn't know anything about fighting such a war where you risk losing your country.
I guess you know that since you keep repeating that lame meme about France.
It was old years ago and now it is just embarrassing so watch./Not FrenchActually, they did fight one such war, the civil war, and even today, a century and a half later, that conflict is still an enormously big deal, especially in the south, which was defeated.
This makes it all the more annoying that knowing this, they still can't grasp the concept of being defeated.
There is no fighting on after your army has been defeated and your country occupied.That said, maybe the French fought bravely, but certainly not well in WW2.
Fearing a repeat of WW1 where a whole generation of french boys died in the trenches, their army was now heavily fortified and excellently prepared for a repeat of the previous war.
As the new war was mobile, they were simply bypassed, surrounded and completely defeated in a matter of weeks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427564</id>
	<title>Bias much?</title>
	<author>zooblethorpe</author>
	<datestamp>1260720840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>One expert was less certain of that.</p><p>"The professional market is showing more resistance to open source software," said Bernard-Louis Roques, chief executive of Truffle Capital IT, <b>an investment fund specializing in software.</b> [emphasis mine]</p></div> </blockquote><p>Gee, I wonder what this Mr. Roques' bias might be...</p><p>Cheers,</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One expert was less certain of that .
" The professional market is showing more resistance to open source software , " said Bernard-Louis Roques , chief executive of Truffle Capital IT , an investment fund specializing in software .
[ emphasis mine ] Gee , I wonder what this Mr. Roques ' bias might be...Cheers ,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One expert was less certain of that.
"The professional market is showing more resistance to open source software," said Bernard-Louis Roques, chief executive of Truffle Capital IT, an investment fund specializing in software.
[emphasis mine] Gee, I wonder what this Mr. Roques' bias might be...Cheers,
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427426</id>
	<title>Open source software and govt's</title>
	<author>Andorin</author>
	<datestamp>1260719040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Score one for the French. Proprietary software does not belong on the computer systems of any significant (ie, state or national) government. Access to source code is necessary in order to ensure that secrets remain secret and the software is up to any custom tasks the government might require.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070829215908/http://www.gnu.org.pe/resmseng.html" title="archive.org" rel="nofollow">This</a> [archive.org] is a letter written by a representative of Peru's government to a representative of Microsoft in 2002, explaining to MS exactly why the government feels that free software is necessary on their computers. Not only does it provide some insightful reasons as to why they're using FOSS, but you get a chance to laugh at the Microsoft rep's arguments.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Score one for the French .
Proprietary software does not belong on the computer systems of any significant ( ie , state or national ) government .
Access to source code is necessary in order to ensure that secrets remain secret and the software is up to any custom tasks the government might require .
This [ archive.org ] is a letter written by a representative of Peru 's government to a representative of Microsoft in 2002 , explaining to MS exactly why the government feels that free software is necessary on their computers .
Not only does it provide some insightful reasons as to why they 're using FOSS , but you get a chance to laugh at the Microsoft rep 's arguments .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Score one for the French.
Proprietary software does not belong on the computer systems of any significant (ie, state or national) government.
Access to source code is necessary in order to ensure that secrets remain secret and the software is up to any custom tasks the government might require.
This [archive.org] is a letter written by a representative of Peru's government to a representative of Microsoft in 2002, explaining to MS exactly why the government feels that free software is necessary on their computers.
Not only does it provide some insightful reasons as to why they're using FOSS, but you get a chance to laugh at the Microsoft rep's arguments.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427952</id>
	<title>Re:At Least...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260725100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The French are not the only people who are trying to shore up and add security to things.  The NSA has added a lot of code to the Linux kernel and a top notch security mechanism.  OS X went from storing passwords in UNIX crypt (3) format to a format that is extremely brute force resistant.</p><p>The fact they do this to an OSS product benefits not just them, but it benefits everyone worldwide.  MUAs are programs that are in constant contact with extremely untrusted code (spam), and have to be highly secure.  Thankfully, few people demand that MUAs do more than render HTML, so there isn't the issue with add-ons that Web browsers have where one broken extension can root a user, and on some machines, root a system.</p><p>ROI-wise, it gives France a secure MUA to use internally without having to concern themselves on license fees; a major gain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The French are not the only people who are trying to shore up and add security to things .
The NSA has added a lot of code to the Linux kernel and a top notch security mechanism .
OS X went from storing passwords in UNIX crypt ( 3 ) format to a format that is extremely brute force resistant.The fact they do this to an OSS product benefits not just them , but it benefits everyone worldwide .
MUAs are programs that are in constant contact with extremely untrusted code ( spam ) , and have to be highly secure .
Thankfully , few people demand that MUAs do more than render HTML , so there is n't the issue with add-ons that Web browsers have where one broken extension can root a user , and on some machines , root a system.ROI-wise , it gives France a secure MUA to use internally without having to concern themselves on license fees ; a major gain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The French are not the only people who are trying to shore up and add security to things.
The NSA has added a lot of code to the Linux kernel and a top notch security mechanism.
OS X went from storing passwords in UNIX crypt (3) format to a format that is extremely brute force resistant.The fact they do this to an OSS product benefits not just them, but it benefits everyone worldwide.
MUAs are programs that are in constant contact with extremely untrusted code (spam), and have to be highly secure.
Thankfully, few people demand that MUAs do more than render HTML, so there isn't the issue with add-ons that Web browsers have where one broken extension can root a user, and on some machines, root a system.ROI-wise, it gives France a secure MUA to use internally without having to concern themselves on license fees; a major gain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427794</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260723360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem isn't the joke itself. The problem is that when it's a "joke" made by many Americans, it's made with complete ignorance.</p><p>I mean, many of these people can't even find France on a world map, even when it's labeled. They have absolutely no understanding about World War I or World War II, or any of the many armed conflicts that France fought in the centuries before the last. They don't even know of France's significant military involvement in the American Revolution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is n't the joke itself .
The problem is that when it 's a " joke " made by many Americans , it 's made with complete ignorance.I mean , many of these people ca n't even find France on a world map , even when it 's labeled .
They have absolutely no understanding about World War I or World War II , or any of the many armed conflicts that France fought in the centuries before the last .
They do n't even know of France 's significant military involvement in the American Revolution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem isn't the joke itself.
The problem is that when it's a "joke" made by many Americans, it's made with complete ignorance.I mean, many of these people can't even find France on a world map, even when it's labeled.
They have absolutely no understanding about World War I or World War II, or any of the many armed conflicts that France fought in the centuries before the last.
They don't even know of France's significant military involvement in the American Revolution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429784</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260797160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Americans always believe in the American  Hollywood version WII. They like to forget that a majority of them were big Hitler fans especially in the south of the US. For example the family of the former president even supported the nazies financially .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Americans always believe in the American Hollywood version WII .
They like to forget that a majority of them were big Hitler fans especially in the south of the US .
For example the family of the former president even supported the nazies financially .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Americans always believe in the American  Hollywood version WII.
They like to forget that a majority of them were big Hitler fans especially in the south of the US.
For example the family of the former president even supported the nazies financially .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429056</id>
	<title>Re:It's over... it's all over</title>
	<author>Bert64</author>
	<datestamp>1260785040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, it is a bit strong for americans to say that...<br>But the British say the same thing, you know that small country that fought in the same war and that hitler turned his attention to after beating the french?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , it is a bit strong for americans to say that...But the British say the same thing , you know that small country that fought in the same war and that hitler turned his attention to after beating the french ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, it is a bit strong for americans to say that...But the British say the same thing, you know that small country that fought in the same war and that hitler turned his attention to after beating the french?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428094</id>
	<title>Re:Uranian Head Cheese</title>
	<author>Bob\_Who</author>
	<datestamp>1260726900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>
(squinting eyes)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.....looks like poop!

(sniffing it)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....Smells like poop!

(chewing)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....tastes like poop!

(righteous glory)....Good thing I didn't Step in It!</htmltext>
<tokenext>( squinting eyes ) .....looks like poop !
( sniffing it ) ....Smells like poop !
( chewing ) ....tastes like poop !
( righteous glory ) ....Good thing I did n't Step in It !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
(squinting eyes) .....looks like poop!
(sniffing it) ....Smells like poop!
(chewing) ....tastes like poop!
(righteous glory)....Good thing I didn't Step in It!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429774</id>
	<title>Re:French thunderbirds rock</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260796980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I prefer the original British Thunderbirds. Thunderbird 2 was my favourite. Ugly as fsck, but man, that thing could carry some heavy stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer the original British Thunderbirds .
Thunderbird 2 was my favourite .
Ugly as fsck , but man , that thing could carry some heavy stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer the original British Thunderbirds.
Thunderbird 2 was my favourite.
Ugly as fsck, but man, that thing could carry some heavy stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427966</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260725340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What makes you think that you are not bigoted for thinking that the majority of Americans hold this opinion about the French instead of a handful of Fox News commentators and some Republicans from the Bible Belt?  Most Americans with any education realize that not only do we have them to thank for success in the Revolutionary War and for half our country with the Louisiana purchase, but that we also have a strong linguistic connection with their culture in addition to genetic ancestry.  Most people with college education realize that the French aren't surrender monkeys either (i.e.: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_French\_wars\_and\_battles#Modern\_Period" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_French\_wars\_and\_battles#Modern\_Period</a> [wikipedia.org] ).  Americans care about and have a high opinion France and the rest of Europe--many of us descend from there.</p><p>Rush Limbaugh and Bible Belt republicans don't represent the views of the majority of Americans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What makes you think that you are not bigoted for thinking that the majority of Americans hold this opinion about the French instead of a handful of Fox News commentators and some Republicans from the Bible Belt ?
Most Americans with any education realize that not only do we have them to thank for success in the Revolutionary War and for half our country with the Louisiana purchase , but that we also have a strong linguistic connection with their culture in addition to genetic ancestry .
Most people with college education realize that the French are n't surrender monkeys either ( i.e .
: http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List \ _of \ _French \ _wars \ _and \ _battles # Modern \ _Period [ wikipedia.org ] ) .
Americans care about and have a high opinion France and the rest of Europe--many of us descend from there.Rush Limbaugh and Bible Belt republicans do n't represent the views of the majority of Americans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What makes you think that you are not bigoted for thinking that the majority of Americans hold this opinion about the French instead of a handful of Fox News commentators and some Republicans from the Bible Belt?
Most Americans with any education realize that not only do we have them to thank for success in the Revolutionary War and for half our country with the Louisiana purchase, but that we also have a strong linguistic connection with their culture in addition to genetic ancestry.
Most people with college education realize that the French aren't surrender monkeys either (i.e.
: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_French\_wars\_and\_battles#Modern\_Period [wikipedia.org] ).
Americans care about and have a high opinion France and the rest of Europe--many of us descend from there.Rush Limbaugh and Bible Belt republicans don't represent the views of the majority of Americans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428606</id>
	<title>Re:Continuing the naming tradition</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260821160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <strong>CheeseEating</strong>SurrenderMonkey</p></div><p>FTFY</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeyFTFY</tokentext>
<sentencetext> CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeyFTFY
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428170</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1260727860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>But if you're going to make a joke, especially a derogatory joke (face it, the "French surrender" jokes are derogatory) at least make them original.<br> <br>

I, like the GP and most people with half a brain are sick of the same tired old "France surrenders, huh, huh" jokes trotted out when even so much as a croissant is referenced. I saw one about Thunderbird crashing whenever it receives a message from Germany and thought that it was semi original enough to justify a funny rating but for the most part such comments are uninspired, unfunny, tired old surrender jokes being trotted out time and time again which we've all heard before.<br> <br>

Maybe the comments are in jest, maybe someone has an anti-France agenda but if you do make derogatory comments in jest make sure they are funny, otherwise they just become annoying.<br> <br>

BTW, at least don't display an ignorance of history, the French resistance did far more harm to the Nazi's then the Vichy collaborators did good for the Nazi's. Much of the early war intel, including several parts of "Ultra" came from resistance fighters who risked their lives and families lives to get that intel.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But if you 're going to make a joke , especially a derogatory joke ( face it , the " French surrender " jokes are derogatory ) at least make them original .
I , like the GP and most people with half a brain are sick of the same tired old " France surrenders , huh , huh " jokes trotted out when even so much as a croissant is referenced .
I saw one about Thunderbird crashing whenever it receives a message from Germany and thought that it was semi original enough to justify a funny rating but for the most part such comments are uninspired , unfunny , tired old surrender jokes being trotted out time and time again which we 've all heard before .
Maybe the comments are in jest , maybe someone has an anti-France agenda but if you do make derogatory comments in jest make sure they are funny , otherwise they just become annoying .
BTW , at least do n't display an ignorance of history , the French resistance did far more harm to the Nazi 's then the Vichy collaborators did good for the Nazi 's .
Much of the early war intel , including several parts of " Ultra " came from resistance fighters who risked their lives and families lives to get that intel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if you're going to make a joke, especially a derogatory joke (face it, the "French surrender" jokes are derogatory) at least make them original.
I, like the GP and most people with half a brain are sick of the same tired old "France surrenders, huh, huh" jokes trotted out when even so much as a croissant is referenced.
I saw one about Thunderbird crashing whenever it receives a message from Germany and thought that it was semi original enough to justify a funny rating but for the most part such comments are uninspired, unfunny, tired old surrender jokes being trotted out time and time again which we've all heard before.
Maybe the comments are in jest, maybe someone has an anti-France agenda but if you do make derogatory comments in jest make sure they are funny, otherwise they just become annoying.
BTW, at least don't display an ignorance of history, the French resistance did far more harm to the Nazi's then the Vichy collaborators did good for the Nazi's.
Much of the early war intel, including several parts of "Ultra" came from resistance fighters who risked their lives and families lives to get that intel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427460</id>
	<title>That explains...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260719460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>why it keeps quitting unexpectedly whenever I receive emails from Germany<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why it keeps quitting unexpectedly whenever I receive emails from Germany ; - ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why it keeps quitting unexpectedly whenever I receive emails from Germany ;-).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427396</id>
	<title>The French military's contribution..</title>
	<author>HockeyPuck</author>
	<datestamp>1260718740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>...helps Firefox run...</i></p><p>Ba-dum Tish...</p><p>I'll be here all week, try the lamb.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...helps Firefox run...Ba-dum Tish...I 'll be here all week , try the lamb .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...helps Firefox run...Ba-dum Tish...I'll be here all week, try the lamb.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427900</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260724560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>    - Gallic Wars<br>
    - Lost. In a war whose ending foreshadows the next 2000 years of French history, France is conquered by of all things, an Italian. [Or at ths time in history, a Roman -ed.]</p><p>
    - Hundred Years War<br>
    - Mostly lost, saved at last by female schizophrenic who inadvertently creates The First Rule of French Warfare; "France's armies are victorious only when not led by a Frenchman." Sainted.</p><p>
    - Italian Wars<br>
    - Lost. France becomes the first and only country to ever lose two wars when fighting Italians.</p><p>
    - Wars of Religion<br>
    - France goes 0-5-4 against the Huguenots</p><p>
    - Thirty Years War<br>
    - France is technically not a participant, but manages to get invaded anyway. Claims a tie on the basis that eventually the other participants started ignoring her.</p><p>
    - War of Revolution<br>
    - Tied. Frenchmen take to wearing red flowerpots as chapeaux.</p><p>
    - The Dutch War<br>
    - Tied</p><p>
    - War of the Augsburg League/King William's War/French and Indian War<br>
    - Lost, but claimed as a tie. Three ties in a row induces deluded Frogophiles the world over to label the period as the height of French military power.</p><p>
    - War of the Spanish Succession<br>
    - Lost. The War also gave the French their first taste of a Marlborough, which they have loved every since.</p><p>
    - American Revolution<br>
    - In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans, France claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action. This is later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome", and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare; "France only wins when America does most of the fighting."</p><p>
    - French Revolution<br>
    - Won, primarily due the fact that the opponent was also French.</p><p>
    - The Napoleonic Wars<br>
    - Lost. Temporary victories (remember the First Rule!) due to leadership of a Corsican, who ended up being no match for a British footwear designer.</p><p>
    - The Franco-Prussian War<br>
    - Lost. Germany first plays the role of drunk Frat boy to France's ugly girl home alone on a Saturday night.</p><p>
    - World War I<br>
    - Tied and on the way to losing, France is saved by the United States [Entering the war late -ed.]. Thousands of French women find out what it's like to not only sleep with a winner, but one who doesn't call her "Fraulein." Sadly, widespread use of condoms by American forces forestalls any improvement in the French bloodline.</p><p>
    - World War II<br>
    - Lost. Conquered French liberated by the United States and Britain just as they finish learning the Horst Wessel Song.</p><p>
    - War in Indochina<br>
    - Lost. French forces plead sickness; take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu</p><p>
    - Algerian Rebellion<br>
    - Lost. Loss marks the first defeat of a western army by a Non-Turkic Muslim force since the Crusades, and produces the First Rule of Muslim Warfare; "We can always beat the French." This rule is identical to the First Rules of the Italians, Russians, Germans, English, Dutch, Spanish, Vietnamese and Esquimaux.</p><p>
    - War on Terrorism<br>
    - France, keeping in mind its recent history, surrenders to Germans and</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>- Gallic Wars - Lost .
In a war whose ending foreshadows the next 2000 years of French history , France is conquered by of all things , an Italian .
[ Or at ths time in history , a Roman -ed .
] - Hundred Years War - Mostly lost , saved at last by female schizophrenic who inadvertently creates The First Rule of French Warfare ; " France 's armies are victorious only when not led by a Frenchman .
" Sainted .
- Italian Wars - Lost .
France becomes the first and only country to ever lose two wars when fighting Italians .
- Wars of Religion - France goes 0-5-4 against the Huguenots - Thirty Years War - France is technically not a participant , but manages to get invaded anyway .
Claims a tie on the basis that eventually the other participants started ignoring her .
- War of Revolution - Tied .
Frenchmen take to wearing red flowerpots as chapeaux .
- The Dutch War - Tied - War of the Augsburg League/King William 's War/French and Indian War - Lost , but claimed as a tie .
Three ties in a row induces deluded Frogophiles the world over to label the period as the height of French military power .
- War of the Spanish Succession - Lost .
The War also gave the French their first taste of a Marlborough , which they have loved every since .
- American Revolution - In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans , France claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action .
This is later known as " de Gaulle Syndrome " , and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare ; " France only wins when America does most of the fighting .
" - French Revolution - Won , primarily due the fact that the opponent was also French .
- The Napoleonic Wars - Lost .
Temporary victories ( remember the First Rule !
) due to leadership of a Corsican , who ended up being no match for a British footwear designer .
- The Franco-Prussian War - Lost .
Germany first plays the role of drunk Frat boy to France 's ugly girl home alone on a Saturday night .
- World War I - Tied and on the way to losing , France is saved by the United States [ Entering the war late -ed. ] .
Thousands of French women find out what it 's like to not only sleep with a winner , but one who does n't call her " Fraulein .
" Sadly , widespread use of condoms by American forces forestalls any improvement in the French bloodline .
- World War II - Lost .
Conquered French liberated by the United States and Britain just as they finish learning the Horst Wessel Song .
- War in Indochina - Lost .
French forces plead sickness ; take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu - Algerian Rebellion - Lost .
Loss marks the first defeat of a western army by a Non-Turkic Muslim force since the Crusades , and produces the First Rule of Muslim Warfare ; " We can always beat the French .
" This rule is identical to the First Rules of the Italians , Russians , Germans , English , Dutch , Spanish , Vietnamese and Esquimaux .
- War on Terrorism - France , keeping in mind its recent history , surrenders to Germans and</tokentext>
<sentencetext>    - Gallic Wars
    - Lost.
In a war whose ending foreshadows the next 2000 years of French history, France is conquered by of all things, an Italian.
[Or at ths time in history, a Roman -ed.
]
    - Hundred Years War
    - Mostly lost, saved at last by female schizophrenic who inadvertently creates The First Rule of French Warfare; "France's armies are victorious only when not led by a Frenchman.
" Sainted.
- Italian Wars
    - Lost.
France becomes the first and only country to ever lose two wars when fighting Italians.
- Wars of Religion
    - France goes 0-5-4 against the Huguenots
    - Thirty Years War
    - France is technically not a participant, but manages to get invaded anyway.
Claims a tie on the basis that eventually the other participants started ignoring her.
- War of Revolution
    - Tied.
Frenchmen take to wearing red flowerpots as chapeaux.
- The Dutch War
    - Tied
    - War of the Augsburg League/King William's War/French and Indian War
    - Lost, but claimed as a tie.
Three ties in a row induces deluded Frogophiles the world over to label the period as the height of French military power.
- War of the Spanish Succession
    - Lost.
The War also gave the French their first taste of a Marlborough, which they have loved every since.
- American Revolution
    - In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans, France claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action.
This is later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome", and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare; "France only wins when America does most of the fighting.
"
    - French Revolution
    - Won, primarily due the fact that the opponent was also French.
- The Napoleonic Wars
    - Lost.
Temporary victories (remember the First Rule!
) due to leadership of a Corsican, who ended up being no match for a British footwear designer.
- The Franco-Prussian War
    - Lost.
Germany first plays the role of drunk Frat boy to France's ugly girl home alone on a Saturday night.
- World War I
    - Tied and on the way to losing, France is saved by the United States [Entering the war late -ed.].
Thousands of French women find out what it's like to not only sleep with a winner, but one who doesn't call her "Fraulein.
" Sadly, widespread use of condoms by American forces forestalls any improvement in the French bloodline.
- World War II
    - Lost.
Conquered French liberated by the United States and Britain just as they finish learning the Horst Wessel Song.
- War in Indochina
    - Lost.
French forces plead sickness; take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu
    - Algerian Rebellion
    - Lost.
Loss marks the first defeat of a western army by a Non-Turkic Muslim force since the Crusades, and produces the First Rule of Muslim Warfare; "We can always beat the French.
" This rule is identical to the First Rules of the Italians, Russians, Germans, English, Dutch, Spanish, Vietnamese and Esquimaux.
- War on Terrorism
    - France, keeping in mind its recent history, surrenders to Germans and</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427888</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260724380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Grow up and stop being so easily offended. It's just a <a href="http://www.janegalt.net/archives/004499.php" title="janegalt.net" rel="nofollow">funny stereotype,</a> [janegalt.net] like Americans being loud, and British food sucking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Grow up and stop being so easily offended .
It 's just a funny stereotype , [ janegalt.net ] like Americans being loud , and British food sucking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Grow up and stop being so easily offended.
It's just a funny stereotype, [janegalt.net] like Americans being loud, and British food sucking.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427732</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1260722760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's an awful lot of pompous self satisfaction from someone who uses emoticons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's an awful lot of pompous self satisfaction from someone who uses emoticons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's an awful lot of pompous self satisfaction from someone who uses emoticons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428304</id>
	<title>Pol Pot</title>
	<author>Max Littlemore</author>
	<datestamp>1260729780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>A lot of people think that Vietnam was a huge "defeat." I'm not going to say that it wasn't, but we did accomplish some goals. Communist Vietnam never became a strong force in Asia, and didn't spread. We effectively contained Communism there. There were two goals in the Cold War: 1) don't allow Communism anywhere, and 2) if #1 fails, then contain it. We absolutely failed at #1, but #2 worked well. People will probably respond that we shouldn't have done anything to stop Communism; I agree that we probably should have stayed out, but the countries where we did stop Communism are markedly better off now, in particular North vs. South Korea.</p></div></blockquote><p>The anti-communism sentiment was quite strong in a lot of countries in the region, as it happens, especially as you go further East. Sorry to burst the bubble, but the US did fuck all to "contain" communism. It contained itself, with Indonesia in paritcular very happy to use US aid given under the illusion of helping fight the reds to entrench a totalitarian regime - and invade East Timor.</p><p>The fact that the Americans went <i>against</i> Ho Chi Minh, a guerilla fighter who in WWII saved US servicemen from the Japanese, cut them off from trade and ostracised them and then left it up to them to deal with Pol Pot is pretty sickening. See I reckon communism is about as evil as unbridled free market capitalism, an opinion I have held for many years and which seems to have been shown to have some merit of late. Mass murder and tactics employed by Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot were <b>not</b> communism any more than extraordinary renditions are free market capitalism.</p><p>I also believe the fight against genocide that occurred in Cambodia would be much more worthy of national pride then the idiocy of Vietnam. What use was the US, with it's premanent position on th in^H^Hsecurity council in actually dealing with the aftermath? None, because when the US gets a sore pride, the US sulks. Or makes surrender monkey jokes. Having pride in that episode is almost as disgusting as having pride in the second Gulf War, and this is coming from someone in a country that also committed troops to both. Stop fooling yourself.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of people think that Vietnam was a huge " defeat .
" I 'm not going to say that it was n't , but we did accomplish some goals .
Communist Vietnam never became a strong force in Asia , and did n't spread .
We effectively contained Communism there .
There were two goals in the Cold War : 1 ) do n't allow Communism anywhere , and 2 ) if # 1 fails , then contain it .
We absolutely failed at # 1 , but # 2 worked well .
People will probably respond that we should n't have done anything to stop Communism ; I agree that we probably should have stayed out , but the countries where we did stop Communism are markedly better off now , in particular North vs. South Korea.The anti-communism sentiment was quite strong in a lot of countries in the region , as it happens , especially as you go further East .
Sorry to burst the bubble , but the US did fuck all to " contain " communism .
It contained itself , with Indonesia in paritcular very happy to use US aid given under the illusion of helping fight the reds to entrench a totalitarian regime - and invade East Timor.The fact that the Americans went against Ho Chi Minh , a guerilla fighter who in WWII saved US servicemen from the Japanese , cut them off from trade and ostracised them and then left it up to them to deal with Pol Pot is pretty sickening .
See I reckon communism is about as evil as unbridled free market capitalism , an opinion I have held for many years and which seems to have been shown to have some merit of late .
Mass murder and tactics employed by Stalin , Mao and Pol Pot were not communism any more than extraordinary renditions are free market capitalism.I also believe the fight against genocide that occurred in Cambodia would be much more worthy of national pride then the idiocy of Vietnam .
What use was the US , with it 's premanent position on th in ^ H ^ Hsecurity council in actually dealing with the aftermath ?
None , because when the US gets a sore pride , the US sulks .
Or makes surrender monkey jokes .
Having pride in that episode is almost as disgusting as having pride in the second Gulf War , and this is coming from someone in a country that also committed troops to both .
Stop fooling yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of people think that Vietnam was a huge "defeat.
" I'm not going to say that it wasn't, but we did accomplish some goals.
Communist Vietnam never became a strong force in Asia, and didn't spread.
We effectively contained Communism there.
There were two goals in the Cold War: 1) don't allow Communism anywhere, and 2) if #1 fails, then contain it.
We absolutely failed at #1, but #2 worked well.
People will probably respond that we shouldn't have done anything to stop Communism; I agree that we probably should have stayed out, but the countries where we did stop Communism are markedly better off now, in particular North vs. South Korea.The anti-communism sentiment was quite strong in a lot of countries in the region, as it happens, especially as you go further East.
Sorry to burst the bubble, but the US did fuck all to "contain" communism.
It contained itself, with Indonesia in paritcular very happy to use US aid given under the illusion of helping fight the reds to entrench a totalitarian regime - and invade East Timor.The fact that the Americans went against Ho Chi Minh, a guerilla fighter who in WWII saved US servicemen from the Japanese, cut them off from trade and ostracised them and then left it up to them to deal with Pol Pot is pretty sickening.
See I reckon communism is about as evil as unbridled free market capitalism, an opinion I have held for many years and which seems to have been shown to have some merit of late.
Mass murder and tactics employed by Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot were not communism any more than extraordinary renditions are free market capitalism.I also believe the fight against genocide that occurred in Cambodia would be much more worthy of national pride then the idiocy of Vietnam.
What use was the US, with it's premanent position on th in^H^Hsecurity council in actually dealing with the aftermath?
None, because when the US gets a sore pride, the US sulks.
Or makes surrender monkey jokes.
Having pride in that episode is almost as disgusting as having pride in the second Gulf War, and this is coming from someone in a country that also committed troops to both.
Stop fooling yourself.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427352</id>
	<title>Well, at least we know it'll run well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260718380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... although I have doubts about its security, given the military involved</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... although I have doubts about its security , given the military involved</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... although I have doubts about its security, given the military involved</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427644</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260721800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not going to call you a "liberal", "faggot", "commie", "pinko" etc but I will say you have a thin skin. There is a reason it's called a joke. Same reason we call Mac users gay and Southerners toothless.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not going to call you a " liberal " , " faggot " , " commie " , " pinko " etc but I will say you have a thin skin .
There is a reason it 's called a joke .
Same reason we call Mac users gay and Southerners toothless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not going to call you a "liberal", "faggot", "commie", "pinko" etc but I will say you have a thin skin.
There is a reason it's called a joke.
Same reason we call Mac users gay and Southerners toothless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427862</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Timbotronic</author>
	<datestamp>1260724140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually I think you'll find that Kiwis, Aussies and especially the Brits enjoy the "surrender monkey" theme just as much. All of us (including Canada of course) sent troops to France on D-Day so I think we're entitled to a little fun. Perhaps Canadians are just too polite - eh?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually I think you 'll find that Kiwis , Aussies and especially the Brits enjoy the " surrender monkey " theme just as much .
All of us ( including Canada of course ) sent troops to France on D-Day so I think we 're entitled to a little fun .
Perhaps Canadians are just too polite - eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually I think you'll find that Kiwis, Aussies and especially the Brits enjoy the "surrender monkey" theme just as much.
All of us (including Canada of course) sent troops to France on D-Day so I think we're entitled to a little fun.
Perhaps Canadians are just too polite - eh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427890</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260724440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>PHROGMAN, eh?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>PHROGMAN , eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PHROGMAN, eh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427366</id>
	<title>Nah,</title>
	<author>gzipped\_tar</author>
	<datestamp>1260718440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll just go on with enigmail.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll just go on with enigmail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll just go on with enigmail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427802</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260723480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Caveat: I am not French just to clarify that. I am (English) Canadian, and I don't even particularly like the French myself.</p></div></blockquote><p>In other words, you have an inbuilt inferiority complex and are still a member of the Commonwealth (ergo, you answer to the UK, bitch).</p><blockquote><div><p>Of course none of you seem to have enough education or enough wit to recall that during the Napoleonic period, France was the most respected and feared nation on earth. They conquered pretty much all of Europe and it took the combined might of England, The Austro-Hungarian Empire, Prussia, Russia and others to eventually defeat them after 20 years of warfare.</p></div></blockquote><p>This is more of a pathetic showing by the European powers than it is of French military prowess.</p><blockquote><div><p>At that point in time the US couldn't even carry out a successful invasion of Canada, and we (as the British) burnt the White House in response.</p></div></blockquote><p>You're always welcome to try again. Elimination of Canada even with EU support (you're trying to join that faggot brigade, remember?) would take less than a month. You're a nation full of effeminate cowards.</p><blockquote><div><p>I for one would like to see this fucking "meme" be laid to rest. It was always present but seems to have been resurrected when the French decided not to commit forces to the first Gulf War (because it wasn't authorized by the UN I believe).</p></div></blockquote><p>If you want to see it laid to rest, then do not come to a site based in the US, Dr Hawking. You're dumber than a bag of hammers.</p><blockquote><div><p>What I am, is tired of seeing US citizens act like a bunch of fucking ignorant assholes, and then wondering why people think they are a bunch of fucking ignorant assholes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></div></blockquote><p>I'm not sure who you're speaking with, but the people I know <b>do not care what the rest of you think</b>. Quit putting words in our collective mouth. You're saying what you <i>wish</i> were happening, not what actually <i>is</i> happening. You Canucks have always had a peculiar version of the Aussie "tall poppy" syndrome with regard to the US.</p><blockquote><div><p>Yes, yes I have met many very decent and nice Americans, they just don't seem to post in response to their fellow citizens offensive shit that crops up like this every few days.</p></div></blockquote><p>Don't you have sites up there where you can discuss igloos, poutine, and moose fucking?</p><p>Btw, two other things: the Avro Arrow always was an overblown fictitious piece of shit (talk about vaporware), and the guy who played Joe Canadian immigrated to the US.</p><p>And.. I double dog dare you to come down to the states and run your mouth in public in the manner you've just ranted on here. Just be forewarned that we don't have universal health care.</p><p>Now, in all seriousness, if it makes you feel any better, the average USian doesn't think about Canada.. ever. You just don't matter that much. Keep sending the lumber, water, and oil down and you <i>might</i> not end up as the next US state.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Caveat : I am not French just to clarify that .
I am ( English ) Canadian , and I do n't even particularly like the French myself.In other words , you have an inbuilt inferiority complex and are still a member of the Commonwealth ( ergo , you answer to the UK , bitch ) .Of course none of you seem to have enough education or enough wit to recall that during the Napoleonic period , France was the most respected and feared nation on earth .
They conquered pretty much all of Europe and it took the combined might of England , The Austro-Hungarian Empire , Prussia , Russia and others to eventually defeat them after 20 years of warfare.This is more of a pathetic showing by the European powers than it is of French military prowess.At that point in time the US could n't even carry out a successful invasion of Canada , and we ( as the British ) burnt the White House in response.You 're always welcome to try again .
Elimination of Canada even with EU support ( you 're trying to join that faggot brigade , remember ?
) would take less than a month .
You 're a nation full of effeminate cowards.I for one would like to see this fucking " meme " be laid to rest .
It was always present but seems to have been resurrected when the French decided not to commit forces to the first Gulf War ( because it was n't authorized by the UN I believe ) .If you want to see it laid to rest , then do not come to a site based in the US , Dr Hawking .
You 're dumber than a bag of hammers.What I am , is tired of seeing US citizens act like a bunch of fucking ignorant assholes , and then wondering why people think they are a bunch of fucking ignorant assholes : PI 'm not sure who you 're speaking with , but the people I know do not care what the rest of you think .
Quit putting words in our collective mouth .
You 're saying what you wish were happening , not what actually is happening .
You Canucks have always had a peculiar version of the Aussie " tall poppy " syndrome with regard to the US.Yes , yes I have met many very decent and nice Americans , they just do n't seem to post in response to their fellow citizens offensive shit that crops up like this every few days.Do n't you have sites up there where you can discuss igloos , poutine , and moose fucking ? Btw , two other things : the Avro Arrow always was an overblown fictitious piece of shit ( talk about vaporware ) , and the guy who played Joe Canadian immigrated to the US.And.. I double dog dare you to come down to the states and run your mouth in public in the manner you 've just ranted on here .
Just be forewarned that we do n't have universal health care.Now , in all seriousness , if it makes you feel any better , the average USian does n't think about Canada.. ever. You just do n't matter that much .
Keep sending the lumber , water , and oil down and you might not end up as the next US state .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Caveat: I am not French just to clarify that.
I am (English) Canadian, and I don't even particularly like the French myself.In other words, you have an inbuilt inferiority complex and are still a member of the Commonwealth (ergo, you answer to the UK, bitch).Of course none of you seem to have enough education or enough wit to recall that during the Napoleonic period, France was the most respected and feared nation on earth.
They conquered pretty much all of Europe and it took the combined might of England, The Austro-Hungarian Empire, Prussia, Russia and others to eventually defeat them after 20 years of warfare.This is more of a pathetic showing by the European powers than it is of French military prowess.At that point in time the US couldn't even carry out a successful invasion of Canada, and we (as the British) burnt the White House in response.You're always welcome to try again.
Elimination of Canada even with EU support (you're trying to join that faggot brigade, remember?
) would take less than a month.
You're a nation full of effeminate cowards.I for one would like to see this fucking "meme" be laid to rest.
It was always present but seems to have been resurrected when the French decided not to commit forces to the first Gulf War (because it wasn't authorized by the UN I believe).If you want to see it laid to rest, then do not come to a site based in the US, Dr Hawking.
You're dumber than a bag of hammers.What I am, is tired of seeing US citizens act like a bunch of fucking ignorant assholes, and then wondering why people think they are a bunch of fucking ignorant assholes :PI'm not sure who you're speaking with, but the people I know do not care what the rest of you think.
Quit putting words in our collective mouth.
You're saying what you wish were happening, not what actually is happening.
You Canucks have always had a peculiar version of the Aussie "tall poppy" syndrome with regard to the US.Yes, yes I have met many very decent and nice Americans, they just don't seem to post in response to their fellow citizens offensive shit that crops up like this every few days.Don't you have sites up there where you can discuss igloos, poutine, and moose fucking?Btw, two other things: the Avro Arrow always was an overblown fictitious piece of shit (talk about vaporware), and the guy who played Joe Canadian immigrated to the US.And.. I double dog dare you to come down to the states and run your mouth in public in the manner you've just ranted on here.
Just be forewarned that we don't have universal health care.Now, in all seriousness, if it makes you feel any better, the average USian doesn't think about Canada.. ever. You just don't matter that much.
Keep sending the lumber, water, and oil down and you might not end up as the next US state.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428248</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>mctk</author>
	<datestamp>1260728940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I shoved my head back up my ass when I found out that the Freedom Fries people were serious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I shoved my head back up my ass when I found out that the Freedom Fries people were serious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I shoved my head back up my ass when I found out that the Freedom Fries people were serious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427342</id>
	<title>What does it do???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260718260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>see a security threat and surrender? j/k</htmltext>
<tokenext>see a security threat and surrender ?
j/k</tokentext>
<sentencetext>see a security threat and surrender?
j/k</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429572</id>
	<title>Re:French thunderbirds rock</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260793080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=403\_1173221009" title="liveleak.com" rel="nofollow">MOAR SURRENDER MONKEYS<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</a> [liveleak.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>MOAR SURRENDER MONKEYS : ) [ liveleak.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MOAR SURRENDER MONKEYS :) [liveleak.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428604</id>
	<title>Re:Now let the Endless French Surrender jokes begi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260821100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lol, your reference is incidentally from a student's webspace.  It is Group 25's research project.</p><p>http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/u/u/uup101/Assign7.htm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lol , your reference is incidentally from a student 's webspace .
It is Group 25 's research project.http : //www.personal.psu.edu/users/u/u/uup101/Assign7.htm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lol, your reference is incidentally from a student's webspace.
It is Group 25's research project.http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/u/u/uup101/Assign7.htm</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427710</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30434360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30434636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30431994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30433206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30431706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30441100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30440004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30434266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30496400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30431042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30443296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30431442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30432366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30431294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30439320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30441796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_0014223_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30432788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_0014223.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427544
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_0014223.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429140
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30432366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428528
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429164
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429076
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429110
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430628
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430084
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429462
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30434266
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30431294
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30433206
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30441100
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429466
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30431042
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430316
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429784
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429068
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30443296
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429808
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30439320
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429806
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429056
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430134
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430672
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30434360
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429602
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429780
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30434636
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30441796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427462
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428606
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430538
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430640
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430178
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430310
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430552
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_0014223.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427766
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_0014223.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429478
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_0014223.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429468
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_0014223.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_0014223.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427862
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430432
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430584
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427710
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427664
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428758
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428242
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427794
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429256
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428102
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428094
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428174
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428540
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30431994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428248
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427724
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428524
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427778
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428278
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429346
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428304
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428046
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428214
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427900
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428500
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430336
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30431442
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30432788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427648
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427644
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30431706
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427698
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429864
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428362
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428266
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30496400
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430928
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429828
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_0014223.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427342
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_0014223.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427460
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_0014223.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_0014223.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30429774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428432
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_0014223.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_0014223.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428018
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_0014223.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30427348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30428326
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30430248
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_0014223.30440004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
