<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_11_1615202</id>
	<title>Slashdot Turns 100,000</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1260529380000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>This entry represents the 100,000th story posted on Slashdot. Technically this is a bit late since we're missing the first few months of stories from the DB, but there are now 100k items in the story database and I thought that milestone was worthy of sharing with the universe.

We've come a long way in the last 12 years, and while the site isn't always exactly what I want it to be, I'm very proud of the work done by our thousands of submitters and by the editors our readers have "affectionately" referred to as "The Slashdot Janitors" for so many years.

Special grats to timothy who is just short of his 17,000th story and is far and away the most prolific person here.  The <a href="http://slashdot.org/hof.shtml">hall of fame</a> has a few other bits of trivia.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This entry represents the 100,000th story posted on Slashdot .
Technically this is a bit late since we 're missing the first few months of stories from the DB , but there are now 100k items in the story database and I thought that milestone was worthy of sharing with the universe .
We 've come a long way in the last 12 years , and while the site is n't always exactly what I want it to be , I 'm very proud of the work done by our thousands of submitters and by the editors our readers have " affectionately " referred to as " The Slashdot Janitors " for so many years .
Special grats to timothy who is just short of his 17,000th story and is far and away the most prolific person here .
The hall of fame has a few other bits of trivia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This entry represents the 100,000th story posted on Slashdot.
Technically this is a bit late since we're missing the first few months of stories from the DB, but there are now 100k items in the story database and I thought that milestone was worthy of sharing with the universe.
We've come a long way in the last 12 years, and while the site isn't always exactly what I want it to be, I'm very proud of the work done by our thousands of submitters and by the editors our readers have "affectionately" referred to as "The Slashdot Janitors" for so many years.
Special grats to timothy who is just short of his 17,000th story and is far and away the most prolific person here.
The hall of fame has a few other bits of trivia.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30416064</id>
	<title>Re:CmdrTaco</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1260648180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Slashdot has been forced to "monetize" itself over the last few years (see troll stories, the addition of "Politics", the entire Idle section, etc).  Obviously he can't complain publicly, but he does occasionally drop a few hints here and there.  The best one was after someone posted the hypothesis that Idle was a place to put crap to troll for page views: the entire slashdot staff posted replies within about two minutes of the comment being made.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot has been forced to " monetize " itself over the last few years ( see troll stories , the addition of " Politics " , the entire Idle section , etc ) .
Obviously he ca n't complain publicly , but he does occasionally drop a few hints here and there .
The best one was after someone posted the hypothesis that Idle was a place to put crap to troll for page views : the entire slashdot staff posted replies within about two minutes of the comment being made .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot has been forced to "monetize" itself over the last few years (see troll stories, the addition of "Politics", the entire Idle section, etc).
Obviously he can't complain publicly, but he does occasionally drop a few hints here and there.
The best one was after someone posted the hypothesis that Idle was a place to put crap to troll for page views: the entire slashdot staff posted replies within about two minutes of the comment being made.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408218</id>
	<title>Congratulations</title>
	<author>Dartz-IRL</author>
	<datestamp>1260533280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From a new user.</p><p>Here's to the next 100k.</p><p>If it was ever all laid out, this site would actually be a pretty interesting resource for future historians. Of course, that depends on future historians being able to read whatever formats the site is stored in.</p><p>Anybody remember the Domesday Book project in Britain from the 80's being digitised into a 'permanent' format, that was obsolete a decade later.?</p><p>Anyway, kudos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From a new user.Here 's to the next 100k.If it was ever all laid out , this site would actually be a pretty interesting resource for future historians .
Of course , that depends on future historians being able to read whatever formats the site is stored in.Anybody remember the Domesday Book project in Britain from the 80 's being digitised into a 'permanent ' format , that was obsolete a decade later .
? Anyway , kudos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From a new user.Here's to the next 100k.If it was ever all laid out, this site would actually be a pretty interesting resource for future historians.
Of course, that depends on future historians being able to read whatever formats the site is stored in.Anybody remember the Domesday Book project in Britain from the 80's being digitised into a 'permanent' format, that was obsolete a decade later.
?Anyway, kudos.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409836</id>
	<title>Since I was a teenager!</title>
	<author>awyeah</author>
	<datestamp>1260543540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure that I created my account here 10 years ago or more... when I was a teenager.</p><p>That being said, this is one of the few things that I did then and still do now.</p><p>Go<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.!</p><p>BTW, is there a way to figure out your actual registration date?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure that I created my account here 10 years ago or more... when I was a teenager.That being said , this is one of the few things that I did then and still do now.Go / .
! BTW , is there a way to figure out your actual registration date ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure that I created my account here 10 years ago or more... when I was a teenager.That being said, this is one of the few things that I did then and still do now.Go /.
!BTW, is there a way to figure out your actual registration date?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30414562</id>
	<title>Congrats /.!</title>
	<author>hoover</author>
	<datestamp>1260637980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congrats guys, keep up the good work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congrats guys , keep up the good work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congrats guys, keep up the good work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411480</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1260557940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Vi versus Emacs<br> <br>
I thought all the vi users would have died of old age by now.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P<br> <br>
I personally like the politics section. It definitely fits into the 'stuff that matters' category. And I like the variety of opinions available. Where else on the internet can you find a group of educated nerds willing to DEBATE not argue (for the most part). Though they are misused sometimes people on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. point out fallacies, how many other sites can claim that?<br> <br>Idle on the other hand is like it was design to drag<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Vi versus Emacs I thought all the vi users would have died of old age by now .
: P I personally like the politics section .
It definitely fits into the 'stuff that matters ' category .
And I like the variety of opinions available .
Where else on the internet can you find a group of educated nerds willing to DEBATE not argue ( for the most part ) .
Though they are misused sometimes people on / .
point out fallacies , how many other sites can claim that ?
Idle on the other hand is like it was design to drag / .
down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vi versus Emacs 
I thought all the vi users would have died of old age by now.
:P 
I personally like the politics section.
It definitely fits into the 'stuff that matters' category.
And I like the variety of opinions available.
Where else on the internet can you find a group of educated nerds willing to DEBATE not argue (for the most part).
Though they are misused sometimes people on /.
point out fallacies, how many other sites can claim that?
Idle on the other hand is like it was design to drag /.
down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409390</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260540600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The moderation system is awesome.  It is the one thing I always notice the lack of when reading other blogs.  It also is much better than the binary system on some blogs, and Reddit and Digg, which tends to lead to an even larger herd (hurd?) mentality than here.  But there has to be more, Kuro5hin has a much more expansive and powerful (or at least arcane) mod system, and has collapsed under the weight of its own lack of relevance long ago.</p><p>The thing that probably lead<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. to keeping its glory is the diversity of the crowd here.  Most of the people here are geeky, many are educated, and every single one of us is opinionated and not scared of trying to fight for ideological supremacy (be it Democrat versus Republican, Socialist versus Libertarian, Vi versus Emacs, KDE versus Gnome, etc...).  The fact that there is no 4chan-ian hive mind here helps a ton.  Every time I come to this site, I can expect to nod my head in complete sycophantic agreement, and erupt flaming bile within the same discussion.</p><p>I just wish that the Politics section never hit, it seemed to have made EVERY damn discussion political (Bush uses BSD therefore BSD sucks...  FreeBSD is socialist, therefore it sucks... etc...).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The moderation system is awesome .
It is the one thing I always notice the lack of when reading other blogs .
It also is much better than the binary system on some blogs , and Reddit and Digg , which tends to lead to an even larger herd ( hurd ?
) mentality than here .
But there has to be more , Kuro5hin has a much more expansive and powerful ( or at least arcane ) mod system , and has collapsed under the weight of its own lack of relevance long ago.The thing that probably lead / .
to keeping its glory is the diversity of the crowd here .
Most of the people here are geeky , many are educated , and every single one of us is opinionated and not scared of trying to fight for ideological supremacy ( be it Democrat versus Republican , Socialist versus Libertarian , Vi versus Emacs , KDE versus Gnome , etc... ) .
The fact that there is no 4chan-ian hive mind here helps a ton .
Every time I come to this site , I can expect to nod my head in complete sycophantic agreement , and erupt flaming bile within the same discussion.I just wish that the Politics section never hit , it seemed to have made EVERY damn discussion political ( Bush uses BSD therefore BSD sucks... FreeBSD is socialist , therefore it sucks... etc... ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The moderation system is awesome.
It is the one thing I always notice the lack of when reading other blogs.
It also is much better than the binary system on some blogs, and Reddit and Digg, which tends to lead to an even larger herd (hurd?
) mentality than here.
But there has to be more, Kuro5hin has a much more expansive and powerful (or at least arcane) mod system, and has collapsed under the weight of its own lack of relevance long ago.The thing that probably lead /.
to keeping its glory is the diversity of the crowd here.
Most of the people here are geeky, many are educated, and every single one of us is opinionated and not scared of trying to fight for ideological supremacy (be it Democrat versus Republican, Socialist versus Libertarian, Vi versus Emacs, KDE versus Gnome, etc...).
The fact that there is no 4chan-ian hive mind here helps a ton.
Every time I come to this site, I can expect to nod my head in complete sycophantic agreement, and erupt flaming bile within the same discussion.I just wish that the Politics section never hit, it seemed to have made EVERY damn discussion political (Bush uses BSD therefore BSD sucks...  FreeBSD is socialist, therefore it sucks... etc...).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408358</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260534000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is my highest numbered account, my first one (three digits as I recall) got lost in some sort of database snafu in the early days and my second one I forgot the password to. I only ever read via RSS though... (and even then I mostly just skim).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is my highest numbered account , my first one ( three digits as I recall ) got lost in some sort of database snafu in the early days and my second one I forgot the password to .
I only ever read via RSS though... ( and even then I mostly just skim ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is my highest numbered account, my first one (three digits as I recall) got lost in some sort of database snafu in the early days and my second one I forgot the password to.
I only ever read via RSS though... (and even then I mostly just skim).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410076</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Draek</author>
	<datestamp>1260545220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem of rewarding good posters too much is that it tends to make the community degenerate into a clique. Look at Wikipedia and its editors, for example.</p><p>The best thing about Slashdot's moderation system, IMHO, is that it rewards good *posts* rather than posters because even Anonymous Cowards can provide interesting insight, and even the most intelligent fellow is liable to the ocassional episode of stupidity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem of rewarding good posters too much is that it tends to make the community degenerate into a clique .
Look at Wikipedia and its editors , for example.The best thing about Slashdot 's moderation system , IMHO , is that it rewards good * posts * rather than posters because even Anonymous Cowards can provide interesting insight , and even the most intelligent fellow is liable to the ocassional episode of stupidity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem of rewarding good posters too much is that it tends to make the community degenerate into a clique.
Look at Wikipedia and its editors, for example.The best thing about Slashdot's moderation system, IMHO, is that it rewards good *posts* rather than posters because even Anonymous Cowards can provide interesting insight, and even the most intelligent fellow is liable to the ocassional episode of stupidity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408208</id>
	<title>yeah</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1260533280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thanks, guys.  I've spent the past 10 years constantly criticizing you, but there must be something about the place if I keep coming back...Well done.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks , guys .
I 've spent the past 10 years constantly criticizing you , but there must be something about the place if I keep coming back...Well done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks, guys.
I've spent the past 10 years constantly criticizing you, but there must be something about the place if I keep coming back...Well done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408568</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1260534900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I had a really low one but lost that account..</p></div></blockquote><p>Me too.</p><p>My really low account number was one lower than your really low account number, but I lost it.  I think it's somewhere in a dresser drawer, next to the keys to my other car, which is a Porsche 911 GT3 RS and has a kicking sound system.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a really low one but lost that account..Me too.My really low account number was one lower than your really low account number , but I lost it .
I think it 's somewhere in a dresser drawer , next to the keys to my other car , which is a Porsche 911 GT3 RS and has a kicking sound system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a really low one but lost that account..Me too.My really low account number was one lower than your really low account number, but I lost it.
I think it's somewhere in a dresser drawer, next to the keys to my other car, which is a Porsche 911 GT3 RS and has a kicking sound system.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408744</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>juuri</author>
	<datestamp>1260536160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The moderation system here at slashdot is terrible.</p><p>But then again most online moderation systems are. Quite simply, it is somewhat depressing that at this point we still don't have a good trusted "commenter identity" system that rewards good posters in a better manner. There are a number of proposed solutions out there but no one seems interested in implementing anything but the most basic systems. We have far too much idle computing power to be implementing this simple systems that don't scale in terms of reward or users.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The moderation system here at slashdot is terrible.But then again most online moderation systems are .
Quite simply , it is somewhat depressing that at this point we still do n't have a good trusted " commenter identity " system that rewards good posters in a better manner .
There are a number of proposed solutions out there but no one seems interested in implementing anything but the most basic systems .
We have far too much idle computing power to be implementing this simple systems that do n't scale in terms of reward or users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The moderation system here at slashdot is terrible.But then again most online moderation systems are.
Quite simply, it is somewhat depressing that at this point we still don't have a good trusted "commenter identity" system that rewards good posters in a better manner.
There are a number of proposed solutions out there but no one seems interested in implementing anything but the most basic systems.
We have far too much idle computing power to be implementing this simple systems that don't scale in terms of reward or users.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409028</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260537840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hesitate to even say it, but yeah, after the greatly stupid $RTBL purge, no mod points for me either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hesitate to even say it , but yeah , after the greatly stupid $ RTBL purge , no mod points for me either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hesitate to even say it, but yeah, after the greatly stupid $RTBL purge, no mod points for me either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408300</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260533700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you really want to play the low UID game, it is possible, perhaps even probable that CmdrTaco will posit with his uid of 1. I'm betting he plans on reading most or all of the comments here, since this as a meta story, and thus is one of the few times he can expect most of the comments to be about the site, and thus of serious interest to him, despite no longer being completely in charge. (If he was, I doubt the awful Slashdot 3.0 improvements (as opposed to the 2.0 system that we eventually got used to) would be in effect. He must know how awful Slashdot 3.0 is.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you really want to play the low UID game , it is possible , perhaps even probable that CmdrTaco will posit with his uid of 1 .
I 'm betting he plans on reading most or all of the comments here , since this as a meta story , and thus is one of the few times he can expect most of the comments to be about the site , and thus of serious interest to him , despite no longer being completely in charge .
( If he was , I doubt the awful Slashdot 3.0 improvements ( as opposed to the 2.0 system that we eventually got used to ) would be in effect .
He must know how awful Slashdot 3.0 is .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you really want to play the low UID game, it is possible, perhaps even probable that CmdrTaco will posit with his uid of 1.
I'm betting he plans on reading most or all of the comments here, since this as a meta story, and thus is one of the few times he can expect most of the comments to be about the site, and thus of serious interest to him, despite no longer being completely in charge.
(If he was, I doubt the awful Slashdot 3.0 improvements (as opposed to the 2.0 system that we eventually got used to) would be in effect.
He must know how awful Slashdot 3.0 is.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196</id>
	<title>lowest account number?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260533160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>third post?!</p><p>I am curious to find which one of us reading this has the lowest account number?  I had a really low one but lost that account..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>third post ?
! I am curious to find which one of us reading this has the lowest account number ?
I had a really low one but lost that account. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>third post?
!I am curious to find which one of us reading this has the lowest account number?
I had a really low one but lost that account..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412062</id>
	<title>I was there, too</title>
	<author>Metiu</author>
	<datestamp>1260610260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was in California (Davis) at the time, and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. gave me good news, interesting thoughts, and showed a brand pre-pre-pre blogging way of handling news.</p><p>In 9/11/2001, you showed to the world how a good community site could be able to support a world which was trembling that day, and you gave a very interesting recount on how you did it.</p><p>Plus, you've always had a bigger, fatter pipe than everyone else!</p><p>Thank you again for still being here, and always getting better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was in California ( Davis ) at the time , and / .
gave me good news , interesting thoughts , and showed a brand pre-pre-pre blogging way of handling news.In 9/11/2001 , you showed to the world how a good community site could be able to support a world which was trembling that day , and you gave a very interesting recount on how you did it.Plus , you 've always had a bigger , fatter pipe than everyone else ! Thank you again for still being here , and always getting better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was in California (Davis) at the time, and /.
gave me good news, interesting thoughts, and showed a brand pre-pre-pre blogging way of handling news.In 9/11/2001, you showed to the world how a good community site could be able to support a world which was trembling that day, and you gave a very interesting recount on how you did it.Plus, you've always had a bigger, fatter pipe than everyone else!Thank you again for still being here, and always getting better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408212</id>
	<title>Star War TV special?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260533280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What happened to the 999,995th (or thereabouts) story?</p><p>It existed, and then was deleted.</p><p><a href="http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:iS4Q7wEpG2cJ:entertainment.slashdot.org/story/09/12/10/1333202/The-Star-Wars-Christmas-Special-Still-Exists+site:entertainment.slashdot.org+slashdot+star+wars+holiday+special&amp;cd=2&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk/" title="209.85.229.132" rel="nofollow">http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:iS4Q7wEpG2cJ:entertainment.slashdot.org/story/09/12/10/1333202/The-Star-Wars-Christmas-Special-Still-Exists+site:entertainment.slashdot.org+slashdot+star+wars+holiday+special&amp;cd=2&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk/</a> [209.85.229.132]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What happened to the 999,995th ( or thereabouts ) story ? It existed , and then was deleted.http : //209.85.229.132/search ? q = cache : iS4Q7wEpG2cJ : entertainment.slashdot.org/story/09/12/10/1333202/The-Star-Wars-Christmas-Special-Still-Exists + site : entertainment.slashdot.org + slashdot + star + wars + holiday + special&amp;cd = 2&amp;hl = en&amp;ct = clnk/ [ 209.85.229.132 ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What happened to the 999,995th (or thereabouts) story?It existed, and then was deleted.http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:iS4Q7wEpG2cJ:entertainment.slashdot.org/story/09/12/10/1333202/The-Star-Wars-Christmas-Special-Still-Exists+site:entertainment.slashdot.org+slashdot+star+wars+holiday+special&amp;cd=2&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk/ [209.85.229.132]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410678</id>
	<title>Congratulations</title>
	<author>Wintywasthere</author>
	<datestamp>1260550440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm a long time lurker, and this is one one of the most informative sites I visit. Despite the odd troll, the discussions are usually thought provoking (even if the thought is NSFW). Good work guys and roll on 200k.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a long time lurker , and this is one one of the most informative sites I visit .
Despite the odd troll , the discussions are usually thought provoking ( even if the thought is NSFW ) .
Good work guys and roll on 200k .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a long time lurker, and this is one one of the most informative sites I visit.
Despite the odd troll, the discussions are usually thought provoking (even if the thought is NSFW).
Good work guys and roll on 200k.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408436</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>palpatine</author>
	<datestamp>1260534300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How's this? I know a few ppl with even lower though... and obviously the staff!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How 's this ?
I know a few ppl with even lower though... and obviously the staff !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How's this?
I know a few ppl with even lower though... and obviously the staff!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409170</id>
	<title>I get far too many mod points</title>
	<author>n00btastic</author>
	<datestamp>1260539100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems like I have a continuous stream of mod points and usually receive more points the day after I finish spending the last bunch. After awhile it begins to feel like a responsibility. I am a fairly ignorant person and as such do not have anything productive to contribute towards most discussions, so do not mind helping moderate...but is it possible that some individuals are in the same boat as me, and are just negging people because it is fun?
<br> <br>
I think you should only begin receiving mod points after a couple weeks of browsing, but not be given points with such a high frequency until you fulfill some sort of karma/time requirement.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems like I have a continuous stream of mod points and usually receive more points the day after I finish spending the last bunch .
After awhile it begins to feel like a responsibility .
I am a fairly ignorant person and as such do not have anything productive to contribute towards most discussions , so do not mind helping moderate...but is it possible that some individuals are in the same boat as me , and are just negging people because it is fun ?
I think you should only begin receiving mod points after a couple weeks of browsing , but not be given points with such a high frequency until you fulfill some sort of karma/time requirement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems like I have a continuous stream of mod points and usually receive more points the day after I finish spending the last bunch.
After awhile it begins to feel like a responsibility.
I am a fairly ignorant person and as such do not have anything productive to contribute towards most discussions, so do not mind helping moderate...but is it possible that some individuals are in the same boat as me, and are just negging people because it is fun?
I think you should only begin receiving mod points after a couple weeks of browsing, but not be given points with such a high frequency until you fulfill some sort of karma/time requirement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408356</id>
	<title>Re:Star War TV special?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260533940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Neither that nor the Star Wars Christmas special ever happened. See to it that you remember that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Neither that nor the Star Wars Christmas special ever happened .
See to it that you remember that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Neither that nor the Star Wars Christmas special ever happened.
See to it that you remember that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412878</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>rolando2424</author>
	<datestamp>1260622560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and erupt flaming bile within the same discussion.</p></div><p>You should go see a doctor about that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and erupt flaming bile within the same discussion.You should go see a doctor about that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and erupt flaming bile within the same discussion.You should go see a doctor about that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409414</id>
	<title>./ made me smarter</title>
	<author>toopok4k3</author>
	<datestamp>1260540720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Congrats are in order. I have been here for at least 5 years now. I can say all the comments and the way people discuss things here changed the way I see/understand the world and people. Big kudos to all of you!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Congrats are in order .
I have been here for at least 5 years now .
I can say all the comments and the way people discuss things here changed the way I see/understand the world and people .
Big kudos to all of you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congrats are in order.
I have been here for at least 5 years now.
I can say all the comments and the way people discuss things here changed the way I see/understand the world and people.
Big kudos to all of you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408734</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260536040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heh, yeah.  I had a low 5-digit account (in the 10k to 20k range IIRC; circa 1998) and now I can't even remember the name or e-mail of the account (I used a one-off e-mail address in an attempt to be anonymous).  Doesn't matter anyway because I don't have the password or e-mail address any more.  Pisses me off cause I wish I had it now.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heh , yeah .
I had a low 5-digit account ( in the 10k to 20k range IIRC ; circa 1998 ) and now I ca n't even remember the name or e-mail of the account ( I used a one-off e-mail address in an attempt to be anonymous ) .
Does n't matter anyway because I do n't have the password or e-mail address any more .
Pisses me off cause I wish I had it now .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heh, yeah.
I had a low 5-digit account (in the 10k to 20k range IIRC; circa 1998) and now I can't even remember the name or e-mail of the account (I used a one-off e-mail address in an attempt to be anonymous).
Doesn't matter anyway because I don't have the password or e-mail address any more.
Pisses me off cause I wish I had it now.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30415536</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>OverlordQ</author>
	<datestamp>1260644400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Glad I'm not the only one, haven't seen any since early 2004.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Glad I 'm not the only one , have n't seen any since early 2004 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glad I'm not the only one, haven't seen any since early 2004.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412084</id>
	<title>In b4 lock (:</title>
	<author>Genocaust</author>
	<datestamp>1260610920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Posting in an Epic thread...er...story...er...whatever you want to call this!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Posting in an Epic thread...er...story...er...whatever you want to call this !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Posting in an Epic thread...er...story...er...whatever you want to call this!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408522</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Nithendil</author>
	<datestamp>1260534720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oddly enough in my old slashdot account even though I never commented and rarely used them I was handed 5 moderation points pretty much every week.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oddly enough in my old slashdot account even though I never commented and rarely used them I was handed 5 moderation points pretty much every week .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oddly enough in my old slashdot account even though I never commented and rarely used them I was handed 5 moderation points pretty much every week.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409940</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>rockNme2349</author>
	<datestamp>1260544260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You think there might be an achievement for posting here? Interesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You think there might be an achievement for posting here ?
Interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You think there might be an achievement for posting here?
Interesting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411834</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Tolkien</author>
	<datestamp>1260649380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>ideological supremacy (be it Democrat versus Republican, Socialist versus Libertarian, Vi versus Emacs, KDE versus Gnome, etc...).</p></div><p>Hah! Your ordering fits perfectly with left-wingedness! Vi puts everyone on equal footing and KDE, well.. it's Linus' preference and he's Finnish...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>ideological supremacy ( be it Democrat versus Republican , Socialist versus Libertarian , Vi versus Emacs , KDE versus Gnome , etc... ) .Hah !
Your ordering fits perfectly with left-wingedness !
Vi puts everyone on equal footing and KDE , well.. it 's Linus ' preference and he 's Finnish.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ideological supremacy (be it Democrat versus Republican, Socialist versus Libertarian, Vi versus Emacs, KDE versus Gnome, etc...).Hah!
Your ordering fits perfectly with left-wingedness!
Vi puts everyone on equal footing and KDE, well.. it's Linus' preference and he's Finnish...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412494</id>
	<title>Meta conversation ahoy!</title>
	<author>randomsearch</author>
	<datestamp>1260617820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To quote one of my (vastly intellectually superior) colleagues:</p><p>"I've never met a meta that I couldn't meta more."</p><p>RS</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To quote one of my ( vastly intellectually superior ) colleagues : " I 've never met a meta that I could n't meta more .
" RS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To quote one of my (vastly intellectually superior) colleagues:"I've never met a meta that I couldn't meta more.
"RS
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30414136</id>
	<title>What is with all the stars wars references?</title>
	<author>grandmofftarkin</author>
	<datestamp>1260634980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We have you with your two digit UID and Darth just above with his 5 digit UID. Who next?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We have you with your two digit UID and Darth just above with his 5 digit UID .
Who next ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have you with your two digit UID and Darth just above with his 5 digit UID.
Who next?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412206</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1260613800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd give you some of mine when I receive more than one allotment in a week but clearly you can't be trusted with them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd give you some of mine when I receive more than one allotment in a week but clearly you ca n't be trusted with them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd give you some of mine when I receive more than one allotment in a week but clearly you can't be trusted with them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408210</id>
	<title>Mazel tov!</title>
	<author>kencf0618</author>
	<datestamp>1260533280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read Slashdot religiously --it's an intregal part of the background of my on-line life!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read Slashdot religiously --it 's an intregal part of the background of my on-line life !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read Slashdot religiously --it's an intregal part of the background of my on-line life!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408292</id>
	<title>CmdrTaco</title>
	<author>dancingmad</author>
	<datestamp>1260533640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm curious about CmdrTaco saying the site isn't always what he wants it to be; care to elaborate?</p><p>I'm seriously not trying to start a flame war or anything like that; just curious as to how the site has differed from your vision for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm curious about CmdrTaco saying the site is n't always what he wants it to be ; care to elaborate ? I 'm seriously not trying to start a flame war or anything like that ; just curious as to how the site has differed from your vision for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm curious about CmdrTaco saying the site isn't always what he wants it to be; care to elaborate?I'm seriously not trying to start a flame war or anything like that; just curious as to how the site has differed from your vision for it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411824</id>
	<title>Congrats Rob and Slashdot</title>
	<author>javac</author>
	<datestamp>1260649320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want to thank Rob for keeping this site going for so long. I have been here from the first couple of months. I first visited slashdot in the fall of 2007, it really has been 12 years. Slashdot was great because they were inclusive, most people were very intelligent and the discussions were great. The other reality is that it was the place to hang out if you liked linux.<br>Anyway, I don't frequent as often as I used to, but I love slashdot and still hope to meet Rob in person some day.</p><p>Jonathan</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to thank Rob for keeping this site going for so long .
I have been here from the first couple of months .
I first visited slashdot in the fall of 2007 , it really has been 12 years .
Slashdot was great because they were inclusive , most people were very intelligent and the discussions were great .
The other reality is that it was the place to hang out if you liked linux.Anyway , I do n't frequent as often as I used to , but I love slashdot and still hope to meet Rob in person some day.Jonathan</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to thank Rob for keeping this site going for so long.
I have been here from the first couple of months.
I first visited slashdot in the fall of 2007, it really has been 12 years.
Slashdot was great because they were inclusive, most people were very intelligent and the discussions were great.
The other reality is that it was the place to hang out if you liked linux.Anyway, I don't frequent as often as I used to, but I love slashdot and still hope to meet Rob in person some day.Jonathan</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408900</id>
	<title>High karma, but stopped getting mod points</title>
	<author>Pausanias</author>
	<datestamp>1260537000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used to get mod points all the time (once a week or so), then it suddenly stopped. My karma is still excellent, and I still have the option to turn off advertising. Is it waiting for me to turn ads off before it gives me my mod points again? Is it detecting adblock? Anyone have an explanation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to get mod points all the time ( once a week or so ) , then it suddenly stopped .
My karma is still excellent , and I still have the option to turn off advertising .
Is it waiting for me to turn ads off before it gives me my mod points again ?
Is it detecting adblock ?
Anyone have an explanation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to get mod points all the time (once a week or so), then it suddenly stopped.
My karma is still excellent, and I still have the option to turn off advertising.
Is it waiting for me to turn ads off before it gives me my mod points again?
Is it detecting adblock?
Anyone have an explanation?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408214</id>
	<title>100,000 stories?</title>
	<author>canajin56</author>
	<datestamp>1260533280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>There may be 100,000 stories, but what's that without dupes though?  1000, 2000 tops?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>There may be 100,000 stories , but what 's that without dupes though ?
1000 , 2000 tops ?
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There may be 100,000 stories, but what's that without dupes though?
1000, 2000 tops?
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411278</id>
	<title>Wow, 12 years, huh? So how's that /. user manual.</title>
	<author>RevWaldo</author>
	<datestamp>1260555960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...coming along? You know, that one concise document explaining how the site works? You got a... got a bunch of screen prints there? Sitting in a folder, huh? Got a... got a outline of a single document distilling all the help pages into a easy-to-read format? Explaining how karma points work? That whole red-to-black filtering thing? Huh? You got a.. got a diagram showing how to navigate the site, huh? How to, uh, how to use the tags, huh? Been working on that for quite some time, yeah? <i>Twelve years, yeah? Something readable and straightforward so that even longtime visitors can understand and take advantage of all the features, yeah? So they, uh, so they don't have to click through all those big long help pages? Maybe as a PDF? Huh? Yeah? Huh?</i> No, no, you deserve some time off... (pats knee.)<br> <br>
No, seriously, congrats.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...coming along ?
You know , that one concise document explaining how the site works ?
You got a... got a bunch of screen prints there ?
Sitting in a folder , huh ?
Got a... got a outline of a single document distilling all the help pages into a easy-to-read format ?
Explaining how karma points work ?
That whole red-to-black filtering thing ?
Huh ? You got a.. got a diagram showing how to navigate the site , huh ?
How to , uh , how to use the tags , huh ?
Been working on that for quite some time , yeah ?
Twelve years , yeah ?
Something readable and straightforward so that even longtime visitors can understand and take advantage of all the features , yeah ?
So they , uh , so they do n't have to click through all those big long help pages ?
Maybe as a PDF ?
Huh ? Yeah ?
Huh ? No , no , you deserve some time off... ( pats knee .
) No , seriously , congrats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...coming along?
You know, that one concise document explaining how the site works?
You got a... got a bunch of screen prints there?
Sitting in a folder, huh?
Got a... got a outline of a single document distilling all the help pages into a easy-to-read format?
Explaining how karma points work?
That whole red-to-black filtering thing?
Huh? You got a.. got a diagram showing how to navigate the site, huh?
How to, uh, how to use the tags, huh?
Been working on that for quite some time, yeah?
Twelve years, yeah?
Something readable and straightforward so that even longtime visitors can understand and take advantage of all the features, yeah?
So they, uh, so they don't have to click through all those big long help pages?
Maybe as a PDF?
Huh? Yeah?
Huh? No, no, you deserve some time off... (pats knee.
) 
No, seriously, congrats.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408378</id>
	<title>Re:Star War TV special?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260534060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What happened to the 999,995th (or thereabouts) story?</p><p>It existed, and then was deleted.
</p><p>
<a href="http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:iS4Q7wEpG2cJ:entertainment.slashdot.org/story/09/12/10/1333202/The-Star-Wars-Christmas-Special-Still-Exists+site:entertainment.slashdot.org+slashdot+star+wars+holiday+special&amp;cd=2&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk/" title="209.85.229.132" rel="nofollow">http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:iS4Q7wEpG2cJ:entertainment.slashdot.org/story/09/12/10/1333202/The-Star-Wars-Christmas-Special-Still-Exists+site:entertainment.slashdot.org+slashdot+star+wars+holiday+special&amp;cd=2&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk/</a> [209.85.229.132]</p></div> </blockquote><p>
999,995 wasn't deleted because it was a dupe.  We have those all the time, and it wasn't a dupe.
</p><p>
It probably had nothing to do with copyright threats from Lucas for links to places to find the episode.
</p><p>
No, it was deleted because (much like the rumored two sequels to <em>The Matrix</em>), there was no such thing as <em>The Star Wars Holiday Special</em>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What happened to the 999,995th ( or thereabouts ) story ? It existed , and then was deleted .
http : //209.85.229.132/search ? q = cache : iS4Q7wEpG2cJ : entertainment.slashdot.org/story/09/12/10/1333202/The-Star-Wars-Christmas-Special-Still-Exists + site : entertainment.slashdot.org + slashdot + star + wars + holiday + special&amp;cd = 2&amp;hl = en&amp;ct = clnk/ [ 209.85.229.132 ] 999,995 was n't deleted because it was a dupe .
We have those all the time , and it was n't a dupe .
It probably had nothing to do with copyright threats from Lucas for links to places to find the episode .
No , it was deleted because ( much like the rumored two sequels to The Matrix ) , there was no such thing as The Star Wars Holiday Special .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What happened to the 999,995th (or thereabouts) story?It existed, and then was deleted.
http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:iS4Q7wEpG2cJ:entertainment.slashdot.org/story/09/12/10/1333202/The-Star-Wars-Christmas-Special-Still-Exists+site:entertainment.slashdot.org+slashdot+star+wars+holiday+special&amp;cd=2&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk/ [209.85.229.132] 
999,995 wasn't deleted because it was a dupe.
We have those all the time, and it wasn't a dupe.
It probably had nothing to do with copyright threats from Lucas for links to places to find the episode.
No, it was deleted because (much like the rumored two sequels to The Matrix), there was no such thing as The Star Wars Holiday Special.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408818</id>
	<title>Re:Congratulations</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1260536520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except the internet keeps changing. This bring all the content right along with the changes in formats.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except the internet keeps changing .
This bring all the content right along with the changes in formats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except the internet keeps changing.
This bring all the content right along with the changes in formats.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409752</id>
	<title>Duplicates?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260543000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm just waiting for the duplicate story for hitting 100,000 stories when they subtract all the duplicates</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm just waiting for the duplicate story for hitting 100,000 stories when they subtract all the duplicates</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm just waiting for the duplicate story for hitting 100,000 stories when they subtract all the duplicates</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411312</id>
	<title>Re:100,000 stories?</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1260556200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "missing" first few months of stories were actually the ones that got duped over the next 15 years.</p><p>Don't believe me? Your tinfoil hat is on crooked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " missing " first few months of stories were actually the ones that got duped over the next 15 years.Do n't believe me ?
Your tinfoil hat is on crooked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "missing" first few months of stories were actually the ones that got duped over the next 15 years.Don't believe me?
Your tinfoil hat is on crooked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409340</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>ascari</author>
	<datestamp>1260540240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mod points? Wait a sec, is that how it works?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod points ?
Wait a sec , is that how it works ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod points?
Wait a sec, is that how it works?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408578</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>bsDaemon</author>
	<datestamp>1260535020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've had like 30 points in the last few weeks... it can grow tiresome, though the dry spell before that was an equal burden.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had like 30 points in the last few weeks... it can grow tiresome , though the dry spell before that was an equal burden .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had like 30 points in the last few weeks... it can grow tiresome, though the dry spell before that was an equal burden.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408778</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Moskit</author>
	<datestamp>1260536340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yup, the same one - welcome to the club<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>While the comment quality has not gone that much down, editorial quality did, in my opinion. I agree that comments convey much more than story "summary".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup , the same one - welcome to the club ; - ) While the comment quality has not gone that much down , editorial quality did , in my opinion .
I agree that comments convey much more than story " summary " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup, the same one - welcome to the club ;-)While the comment quality has not gone that much down, editorial quality did, in my opinion.
I agree that comments convey much more than story "summary".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408876</id>
	<title>Memorable trolls</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1260536820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
It's quite interesting.  I remember this site was a ham-fisted, testosterone-overloaded, obssessive-compulsive, uber-pedantic nerd rage fest. (You're welcome<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-).
</p><p>
Somehow, though, decent comments were thrown in now and then, modded up, people who've got older and mellow still hanging on (on and off), more people from fields other than computer nerddom came on, and it became whole new mess of a beast.
</p><p>
I'd like to conclude this remark with a goatse link, but I can't be bothered - type in the link yourself.
</p><p>
Oh, reply with some good trolls that visited slashdot, from Soviet Russia or whatever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's quite interesting .
I remember this site was a ham-fisted , testosterone-overloaded , obssessive-compulsive , uber-pedantic nerd rage fest .
( You 're welcome : - ) .
Somehow , though , decent comments were thrown in now and then , modded up , people who 've got older and mellow still hanging on ( on and off ) , more people from fields other than computer nerddom came on , and it became whole new mess of a beast .
I 'd like to conclude this remark with a goatse link , but I ca n't be bothered - type in the link yourself .
Oh , reply with some good trolls that visited slashdot , from Soviet Russia or whatever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
It's quite interesting.
I remember this site was a ham-fisted, testosterone-overloaded, obssessive-compulsive, uber-pedantic nerd rage fest.
(You're welcome :-).
Somehow, though, decent comments were thrown in now and then, modded up, people who've got older and mellow still hanging on (on and off), more people from fields other than computer nerddom came on, and it became whole new mess of a beast.
I'd like to conclude this remark with a goatse link, but I can't be bothered - type in the link yourself.
Oh, reply with some good trolls that visited slashdot, from Soviet Russia or whatever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411244</id>
	<title>Binary Adieu!</title>
	<author>nanospook</author>
	<datestamp>1260555720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>CmdrTaco, it would have meant more to me if you had waited to reach a power of 2! oh never mind..</htmltext>
<tokenext>CmdrTaco , it would have meant more to me if you had waited to reach a power of 2 !
oh never mind. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CmdrTaco, it would have meant more to me if you had waited to reach a power of 2!
oh never mind..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411528</id>
	<title>You lost touch...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260558540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>the site isn't always exactly what I want it to be</p></div></blockquote><p>You lost touch with the users when:</p><p>1. You changed how the commenting thread system worked, because there was nothing wrong with it<br>2. You used stupid cheap javascript crappy menus for "get more comments". Again, you "fixed" something that wasn't broken.<br>3. You fucking crash the iPhone browser for fucks sake. You don't even have a mobile version of the site that's readable without crashing the iPhone. Are you kidding me?<br>4. You delete posts if they're even somewhat misogynistic.<br>5. You added the idiotic IDLE section, where you decided it was best to try to emulate "something awful" while doing it wrong, and making fun of your readers at the same time.</p><p>I'd be surprised if you're honestly here in another 12 years. You were once the best, but now you fucking suck.</p><p><b>HEY BUT NOT LIKE ANYONE WILL SEE THIS COMMENT, SINCE YOU HAVE TO REPLY TO THE TOP COMMENT FIVE MINUTES AFTER THE STORY IS OPEN FOR IT TO EVEN BE SEEN!</b></p><p>If you want to see a site that <b>WORKS</b>, and <b>REALLY IS</b> "news for nerds" and <b>REALLY DOES</b> have "stuff that matters", please visit <b>http://reddit.com/</b></p><p>That's right, <b>http://reddit.com/</b>. It's absolutely what slashdot SHOULD have become, if they hadn't sat on their asses for 10 of the 12 years.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the site is n't always exactly what I want it to beYou lost touch with the users when : 1 .
You changed how the commenting thread system worked , because there was nothing wrong with it2 .
You used stupid cheap javascript crappy menus for " get more comments " .
Again , you " fixed " something that was n't broken.3 .
You fucking crash the iPhone browser for fucks sake .
You do n't even have a mobile version of the site that 's readable without crashing the iPhone .
Are you kidding me ? 4 .
You delete posts if they 're even somewhat misogynistic.5 .
You added the idiotic IDLE section , where you decided it was best to try to emulate " something awful " while doing it wrong , and making fun of your readers at the same time.I 'd be surprised if you 're honestly here in another 12 years .
You were once the best , but now you fucking suck.HEY BUT NOT LIKE ANYONE WILL SEE THIS COMMENT , SINCE YOU HAVE TO REPLY TO THE TOP COMMENT FIVE MINUTES AFTER THE STORY IS OPEN FOR IT TO EVEN BE SEEN ! If you want to see a site that WORKS , and REALLY IS " news for nerds " and REALLY DOES have " stuff that matters " , please visit http : //reddit.com/That 's right , http : //reddit.com/ .
It 's absolutely what slashdot SHOULD have become , if they had n't sat on their asses for 10 of the 12 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the site isn't always exactly what I want it to beYou lost touch with the users when:1.
You changed how the commenting thread system worked, because there was nothing wrong with it2.
You used stupid cheap javascript crappy menus for "get more comments".
Again, you "fixed" something that wasn't broken.3.
You fucking crash the iPhone browser for fucks sake.
You don't even have a mobile version of the site that's readable without crashing the iPhone.
Are you kidding me?4.
You delete posts if they're even somewhat misogynistic.5.
You added the idiotic IDLE section, where you decided it was best to try to emulate "something awful" while doing it wrong, and making fun of your readers at the same time.I'd be surprised if you're honestly here in another 12 years.
You were once the best, but now you fucking suck.HEY BUT NOT LIKE ANYONE WILL SEE THIS COMMENT, SINCE YOU HAVE TO REPLY TO THE TOP COMMENT FIVE MINUTES AFTER THE STORY IS OPEN FOR IT TO EVEN BE SEEN!If you want to see a site that WORKS, and REALLY IS "news for nerds" and REALLY DOES have "stuff that matters", please visit http://reddit.com/That's right, http://reddit.com/.
It's absolutely what slashdot SHOULD have become, if they hadn't sat on their asses for 10 of the 12 years.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408830</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1260536580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I get them all the time! (-1 Troll)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I get them all the time !
( -1 Troll )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I get them all the time!
(-1 Troll)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166</id>
	<title>Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260532980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's amazing to me isn't that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. has carried on this long, but rather that the comment quality on here hasn't gone the way of most social new sites. It seems that in general as a social news site ages, matures, and grows, the comment quality follows an inverse pattern. Or more simply, as the number of users approaches infinity, the comment quality approaches 4chan. Digg used to be a decent site for discussion; now you'd be laughed at for even suggesting that the comments might be notable. Reddit is quickly getting there. Slashdot though seems to best this pattern. While I'm well aware that someone will reply to this with "In soviet russia 4chan approaches you!" or something similar in a successful attempt to disprove my point, but I think it still holds true in some respect. Kudos slashdot, keep it up. You keep trying to make UI (un)improvements and we'll still be here to comment without RTFA - and we'll both be thankful for it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's amazing to me is n't that / .
has carried on this long , but rather that the comment quality on here has n't gone the way of most social new sites .
It seems that in general as a social news site ages , matures , and grows , the comment quality follows an inverse pattern .
Or more simply , as the number of users approaches infinity , the comment quality approaches 4chan .
Digg used to be a decent site for discussion ; now you 'd be laughed at for even suggesting that the comments might be notable .
Reddit is quickly getting there .
Slashdot though seems to best this pattern .
While I 'm well aware that someone will reply to this with " In soviet russia 4chan approaches you !
" or something similar in a successful attempt to disprove my point , but I think it still holds true in some respect .
Kudos slashdot , keep it up .
You keep trying to make UI ( un ) improvements and we 'll still be here to comment without RTFA - and we 'll both be thankful for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's amazing to me isn't that /.
has carried on this long, but rather that the comment quality on here hasn't gone the way of most social new sites.
It seems that in general as a social news site ages, matures, and grows, the comment quality follows an inverse pattern.
Or more simply, as the number of users approaches infinity, the comment quality approaches 4chan.
Digg used to be a decent site for discussion; now you'd be laughed at for even suggesting that the comments might be notable.
Reddit is quickly getting there.
Slashdot though seems to best this pattern.
While I'm well aware that someone will reply to this with "In soviet russia 4chan approaches you!
" or something similar in a successful attempt to disprove my point, but I think it still holds true in some respect.
Kudos slashdot, keep it up.
You keep trying to make UI (un)improvements and we'll still be here to comment without RTFA - and we'll both be thankful for it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412142</id>
	<title>I'll probably get modded down for this, but</title>
	<author>WGFCrafty</author>
	<datestamp>1260612300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it seems some people use the previous phrase (title) as some form of reverse moderation psychology.<br> <br>We need to fight this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>it seems some people use the previous phrase ( title ) as some form of reverse moderation psychology .
We need to fight this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it seems some people use the previous phrase (title) as some form of reverse moderation psychology.
We need to fight this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410210</id>
	<title>Ctrl+F and only one overlord, in a reference?!</title>
	<author>ZirconCode</author>
	<datestamp>1260546720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I for one Welcome our New Slashdot Overlords!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one Welcome our New Slashdot Overlords !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one Welcome our New Slashdot Overlords!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409706</id>
	<title>Re:Here's to the next 100000</title>
	<author>awyeah</author>
	<datestamp>1260542640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... and, there it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and , there it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and, there it is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412082</id>
	<title>awesome</title>
	<author>CeramicNuts</author>
	<datestamp>1260610860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>my number one stop on the net, every day for the last 12 years.</p><p>Keep it Up!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>my number one stop on the net , every day for the last 12 years.Keep it Up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>my number one stop on the net, every day for the last 12 years.Keep it Up!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408558</id>
	<title>Re:CmdrTaco</title>
	<author>RobotRunAmok</author>
	<datestamp>1260534840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I'm curious about CmdrTaco saying the site isn't always what he wants it to be; care to elaborate?</i></p><p>I think he was referring to the decided lack of tentacle hentai.  I'm pretty sure slashdot-as-tentacle-hentai-hub was part of the original prospectus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm curious about CmdrTaco saying the site is n't always what he wants it to be ; care to elaborate ? I think he was referring to the decided lack of tentacle hentai .
I 'm pretty sure slashdot-as-tentacle-hentai-hub was part of the original prospectus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm curious about CmdrTaco saying the site isn't always what he wants it to be; care to elaborate?I think he was referring to the decided lack of tentacle hentai.
I'm pretty sure slashdot-as-tentacle-hentai-hub was part of the original prospectus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408278</id>
	<title>not to toot my own horn</title>
	<author>Trailer Trash</author>
	<datestamp>1260533640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's been 10 years this month since we saved Hotmail, on Dec. 25 1999.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's been 10 years this month since we saved Hotmail , on Dec. 25 1999 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's been 10 years this month since we saved Hotmail, on Dec. 25 1999.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408456</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1260534420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably CmdrTaco, he seems to spend more time reading and commenting on the meta stories than the general stories.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably CmdrTaco , he seems to spend more time reading and commenting on the meta stories than the general stories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably CmdrTaco, he seems to spend more time reading and commenting on the meta stories than the general stories.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410800</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>LuxMaker</author>
	<datestamp>1260551340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You conspicuously forgot Linux vs. Windows, PC vs. Mac.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You conspicuously forgot Linux vs. Windows , PC vs. Mac .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You conspicuously forgot Linux vs. Windows, PC vs. Mac.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408222</id>
	<title>&gt;65,635 stories?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260533340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least we know they used the <a href="http://slashdot.org/articles/06/11/09/1534204.shtml" title="slashdot.org">right data type</a> [slashdot.org] for the stories<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least we know they used the right data type [ slashdot.org ] for the stories ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least we know they used the right data type [slashdot.org] for the stories ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409454</id>
	<title>Interesting Stories</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260540960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have noticed in recent times that there are a lot of TV shows picking up stories from<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. - so much so that it seems really obvious. To me<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. is my main source of useful news which I supplement with the (hard to find) quality journalism of <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/" title="abc.net.au">Lateline</a> [abc.net.au] - who don't seem to source stories from slashdot.</p><p>

I wonder how long it is before many news sources get more news from<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p><p>

Congratulations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have noticed in recent times that there are a lot of TV shows picking up stories from / .
- so much so that it seems really obvious .
To me / .
is my main source of useful news which I supplement with the ( hard to find ) quality journalism of Lateline [ abc.net.au ] - who do n't seem to source stories from slashdot .
I wonder how long it is before many news sources get more news from / .
Congratulations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have noticed in recent times that there are a lot of TV shows picking up stories from /.
- so much so that it seems really obvious.
To me /.
is my main source of useful news which I supplement with the (hard to find) quality journalism of Lateline [abc.net.au] - who don't seem to source stories from slashdot.
I wonder how long it is before many news sources get more news from /.
Congratulations.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409232</id>
	<title>I can't even remember how I found Slashdot</title>
	<author>heffel</author>
	<datestamp>1260539580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I stumbled upon Slashdot many, may years ago.</p><p>I was amazed at all the quality links and informative comments.</p><p>For whatever reason, I didn't bookmark the site after I visited for the first time, then for the life of me I couldn't remember the URL.</p><p>I kept searching for "news for geeks" (which I swore was the tagline of that awesome site I stumbled upon) in Yahoo (this was before Google rose to the top of the search engines) but didn't get any good results.</p><p>After a while I somehow found Slashdot again, and had a "do'h" moment when I saw that the tagline was "News for nerds", not "News for geeks" as I remembered it.</p><p>It took me a while to actually create an account, oh, how I wish my account number was even lower.</p><p>In any case, I'm glad to have been a part of the Slashdot community for the most part of my professional life.</p><p>Thanks Slashdot, for keeping us all in the loop of the latest happenings in the technology world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I stumbled upon Slashdot many , may years ago.I was amazed at all the quality links and informative comments.For whatever reason , I did n't bookmark the site after I visited for the first time , then for the life of me I could n't remember the URL.I kept searching for " news for geeks " ( which I swore was the tagline of that awesome site I stumbled upon ) in Yahoo ( this was before Google rose to the top of the search engines ) but did n't get any good results.After a while I somehow found Slashdot again , and had a " do'h " moment when I saw that the tagline was " News for nerds " , not " News for geeks " as I remembered it.It took me a while to actually create an account , oh , how I wish my account number was even lower.In any case , I 'm glad to have been a part of the Slashdot community for the most part of my professional life.Thanks Slashdot , for keeping us all in the loop of the latest happenings in the technology world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I stumbled upon Slashdot many, may years ago.I was amazed at all the quality links and informative comments.For whatever reason, I didn't bookmark the site after I visited for the first time, then for the life of me I couldn't remember the URL.I kept searching for "news for geeks" (which I swore was the tagline of that awesome site I stumbled upon) in Yahoo (this was before Google rose to the top of the search engines) but didn't get any good results.After a while I somehow found Slashdot again, and had a "do'h" moment when I saw that the tagline was "News for nerds", not "News for geeks" as I remembered it.It took me a while to actually create an account, oh, how I wish my account number was even lower.In any case, I'm glad to have been a part of the Slashdot community for the most part of my professional life.Thanks Slashdot, for keeping us all in the loop of the latest happenings in the technology world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408632</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Beardo the Bearded</author>
	<datestamp>1260535380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you get them, just do what I do -- find a thread you don't have any interest in and moderate the first X posts as "under-rated". (X is the number of mod points you get, which is 15 for me.)</p><p>This gives you the benefit of nothaving to actually moderate plus you can't be meta-moderated.</p><p>I get points about once a week. YMMV. CYLDFD.</p><p>I'm really only posting here in case there's an acheivement... achievement... anchoviement.</p><p>Sorry, not enough sleep makes everything seem funny. At least I'm not rambling on pointlessly.</p><p>Wait.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you get them , just do what I do -- find a thread you do n't have any interest in and moderate the first X posts as " under-rated " .
( X is the number of mod points you get , which is 15 for me .
) This gives you the benefit of nothaving to actually moderate plus you ca n't be meta-moderated.I get points about once a week .
YMMV. CYLDFD.I 'm really only posting here in case there 's an acheivement... achievement... anchoviement.Sorry , not enough sleep makes everything seem funny .
At least I 'm not rambling on pointlessly.Wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you get them, just do what I do -- find a thread you don't have any interest in and moderate the first X posts as "under-rated".
(X is the number of mod points you get, which is 15 for me.
)This gives you the benefit of nothaving to actually moderate plus you can't be meta-moderated.I get points about once a week.
YMMV. CYLDFD.I'm really only posting here in case there's an acheivement... achievement... anchoviement.Sorry, not enough sleep makes everything seem funny.
At least I'm not rambling on pointlessly.Wait.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408386</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>Yprime</author>
	<datestamp>1260534060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is my second account. I lost the email account that was tied to the first and forgot the password. . I had forgotten this one too for a long time, so I mainly use my third one which has a uid in the 600k range.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is my second account .
I lost the email account that was tied to the first and forgot the password .
. I had forgotten this one too for a long time , so I mainly use my third one which has a uid in the 600k range .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is my second account.
I lost the email account that was tied to the first and forgot the password.
. I had forgotten this one too for a long time, so I mainly use my third one which has a uid in the 600k range.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408446</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Firehed</author>
	<datestamp>1260534360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I haven't gotten mod points in quite a while either.  That's why it's successful!</p><p>Wait a second...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't gotten mod points in quite a while either .
That 's why it 's successful ! Wait a second.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't gotten mod points in quite a while either.
That's why it's successful!Wait a second...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410404</id>
	<title>Roland Piquepaille</title>
	<author>maotx</author>
	<datestamp>1260548100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm surprised that there hasn't been a mention of <a href="http://slashdot.org/~rpiquepa/" title="slashdot.org">rpiquepa</a> [slashdot.org] <br> <br>

Or does one not live on after <a href="http://meta.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/09/1456216" title="slashdot.org">death?</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm surprised that there has n't been a mention of rpiquepa [ slashdot.org ] Or does one not live on after death ?
[ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm surprised that there hasn't been a mention of rpiquepa [slashdot.org]  

Or does one not live on after death?
[slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30421838</id>
	<title>A brief shot of nostalgia and thanks</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1260708300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a) Slashdot has occupied many of my hours for the last decade-plus, and I get to read it at work, which is nicely circular. I've poked at the firehose (formerly "the bin") from more than half of the states of the union (often from within my car, though not while driving), as well as from at least three other countries, and gotten to meet a lot of very interesting people thereby, many of whom remind me of how smart I'm not.</p><p>b) Thanks to Dug Song for getting me interested, roundabout fashion, in computer software and licensing, and Alvin Richardson and Dan Jones (two of my housemates in Austin, long ago); one of them -- I think Alvin, but could have been either -- first pointed out Slashdot to me, probably because I was running Linux and burbling about computers, something they both knew and know far more about.</p><p>c) Thanks also to the readers who (somtimes even politely!) have pointed out my many shortcomings, suggested better links, added supplemental information, or just plain added comments to stories. Slashdot is about the conversation, and trying to coax the signal usefully above the noise.</p><p>timothy</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a ) Slashdot has occupied many of my hours for the last decade-plus , and I get to read it at work , which is nicely circular .
I 've poked at the firehose ( formerly " the bin " ) from more than half of the states of the union ( often from within my car , though not while driving ) , as well as from at least three other countries , and gotten to meet a lot of very interesting people thereby , many of whom remind me of how smart I 'm not.b ) Thanks to Dug Song for getting me interested , roundabout fashion , in computer software and licensing , and Alvin Richardson and Dan Jones ( two of my housemates in Austin , long ago ) ; one of them -- I think Alvin , but could have been either -- first pointed out Slashdot to me , probably because I was running Linux and burbling about computers , something they both knew and know far more about.c ) Thanks also to the readers who ( somtimes even politely !
) have pointed out my many shortcomings , suggested better links , added supplemental information , or just plain added comments to stories .
Slashdot is about the conversation , and trying to coax the signal usefully above the noise.timothy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a) Slashdot has occupied many of my hours for the last decade-plus, and I get to read it at work, which is nicely circular.
I've poked at the firehose (formerly "the bin") from more than half of the states of the union (often from within my car, though not while driving), as well as from at least three other countries, and gotten to meet a lot of very interesting people thereby, many of whom remind me of how smart I'm not.b) Thanks to Dug Song for getting me interested, roundabout fashion, in computer software and licensing, and Alvin Richardson and Dan Jones (two of my housemates in Austin, long ago); one of them -- I think Alvin, but could have been either -- first pointed out Slashdot to me, probably because I was running Linux and burbling about computers, something they both knew and know far more about.c) Thanks also to the readers who (somtimes even politely!
) have pointed out my many shortcomings, suggested better links, added supplemental information, or just plain added comments to stories.
Slashdot is about the conversation, and trying to coax the signal usefully above the noise.timothy</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408646</id>
	<title>Re:100,000 stories?</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1260535500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just one.  In fact all stories ever posted have been about the Evil Bit.  Some are well disguised.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just one .
In fact all stories ever posted have been about the Evil Bit .
Some are well disguised .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just one.
In fact all stories ever posted have been about the Evil Bit.
Some are well disguised.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408704</id>
	<title>Special edition</title>
	<author>DrYak</author>
	<datestamp>1260535800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry : The story will be back soon as soon as Georges Lucas finishes editing a "Special edition" of the story, now featuring more comments by Jar-Jar.<br>And more hot grits on Natalie Portman.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry : The story will be back soon as soon as Georges Lucas finishes editing a " Special edition " of the story , now featuring more comments by Jar-Jar.And more hot grits on Natalie Portman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry : The story will be back soon as soon as Georges Lucas finishes editing a "Special edition" of the story, now featuring more comments by Jar-Jar.And more hot grits on Natalie Portman.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411994</id>
	<title>SQL</title>
	<author>daveime</author>
	<datestamp>1260608940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SELECT story FROM table WHERE dupe = TRUE<br>50,000 Rows Returned</p><p>Ooops, looks like that might only be the 50k milestone after all</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SELECT story FROM table WHERE dupe = TRUE50,000 Rows ReturnedOoops , looks like that might only be the 50k milestone after all</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SELECT story FROM table WHERE dupe = TRUE50,000 Rows ReturnedOoops, looks like that might only be the 50k milestone after all</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409168</id>
	<title>Re:Here's to the next 100000</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1260539100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Look at that.  How adorable.  It's from the genuine AC, too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at that .
How adorable .
It 's from the genuine AC , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at that.
How adorable.
It's from the genuine AC, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410762</id>
	<title>In Soviet Russia...</title>
	<author>I'm not a script, da</author>
	<datestamp>1260551100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot dupes <b>you</b>!</p><p>Slashdot dupes <b>you</b>!</p><p>Slashdot dupes <b>you</b>!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot dupes you ! Slashdot dupes you ! Slashdot dupes you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot dupes you!Slashdot dupes you!Slashdot dupes you!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30413696</id>
	<title>100,000 and still Web 0.5</title>
	<author>Rocketship Underpant</author>
	<datestamp>1260631320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot is now the only website on the Internet with 100,000 pages that are Unicode-incompatible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot is now the only website on the Internet with 100,000 pages that are Unicode-incompatible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot is now the only website on the Internet with 100,000 pages that are Unicode-incompatible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411504</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>a.ameri</author>
	<datestamp>1260558300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know you were trying to be funny, but GT3 RS with a sound system? Seriously?! It's like setting emacs with vi key bindings. Or setting bash as the default shell in NetBSD. It's travesty!<br>
<br>
You pay $40,000 more than the normal GT3 for Porsche to rip out everything from the car to make it light, including the engine noise filters, GPS, adjustable seats, and <b>the sound system</b>. The engine and the chassis aren't that different between a normal GT3 and a GT3 RS. It's mostly the weight.
<br> <br>
I assure you, that after you look at your bank balance and realise that it's $40,000 short cause you wanted to get rid of every last extra gram on your car, you will not be adding any weight to it. In fact, you'll soon be joining your local gym when you notice that you are not getting the claimed 0-60 times.
<br> <br>
Oh well, I guess after 100,000 posts I still don't know that I shouldn't talk about cars here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know you were trying to be funny , but GT3 RS with a sound system ?
Seriously ? ! It 's like setting emacs with vi key bindings .
Or setting bash as the default shell in NetBSD .
It 's travesty !
You pay $ 40,000 more than the normal GT3 for Porsche to rip out everything from the car to make it light , including the engine noise filters , GPS , adjustable seats , and the sound system .
The engine and the chassis are n't that different between a normal GT3 and a GT3 RS .
It 's mostly the weight .
I assure you , that after you look at your bank balance and realise that it 's $ 40,000 short cause you wanted to get rid of every last extra gram on your car , you will not be adding any weight to it .
In fact , you 'll soon be joining your local gym when you notice that you are not getting the claimed 0-60 times .
Oh well , I guess after 100,000 posts I still do n't know that I should n't talk about cars here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know you were trying to be funny, but GT3 RS with a sound system?
Seriously?! It's like setting emacs with vi key bindings.
Or setting bash as the default shell in NetBSD.
It's travesty!
You pay $40,000 more than the normal GT3 for Porsche to rip out everything from the car to make it light, including the engine noise filters, GPS, adjustable seats, and the sound system.
The engine and the chassis aren't that different between a normal GT3 and a GT3 RS.
It's mostly the weight.
I assure you, that after you look at your bank balance and realise that it's $40,000 short cause you wanted to get rid of every last extra gram on your car, you will not be adding any weight to it.
In fact, you'll soon be joining your local gym when you notice that you are not getting the claimed 0-60 times.
Oh well, I guess after 100,000 posts I still don't know that I shouldn't talk about cars here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408852</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>mooingyak</author>
	<datestamp>1260536640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I am curious to find which one of us reading this has the lowest account number? I had a really low one but lost that account..</p></div></blockquote><p>After taking the limit as account numbers approach infinity, I do.</p><p>But then, you do too.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am curious to find which one of us reading this has the lowest account number ?
I had a really low one but lost that account..After taking the limit as account numbers approach infinity , I do.But then , you do too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am curious to find which one of us reading this has the lowest account number?
I had a really low one but lost that account..After taking the limit as account numbers approach infinity, I do.But then, you do too.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412904</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>IntlHarvester</author>
	<datestamp>1260622920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The moderation system is awesome.</p> </div><p>I could complain about moderation all day long, but the bottom line is that it generally works from the reader's standpoint.</p><p>The one thing that most<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. posters don't understand is that moderation is for the general unregistered user's benefit, not your karma score. If you browse Slashdot without being logged in, the discussions are boiled down the essential gist of the issue,without hundreds of posts of nerd nonsense.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The moderation system is awesome .
I could complain about moderation all day long , but the bottom line is that it generally works from the reader 's standpoint.The one thing that most / .
posters do n't understand is that moderation is for the general unregistered user 's benefit , not your karma score .
If you browse Slashdot without being logged in , the discussions are boiled down the essential gist of the issue,without hundreds of posts of nerd nonsense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The moderation system is awesome.
I could complain about moderation all day long, but the bottom line is that it generally works from the reader's standpoint.The one thing that most /.
posters don't understand is that moderation is for the general unregistered user's benefit, not your karma score.
If you browse Slashdot without being logged in, the discussions are boiled down the essential gist of the issue,without hundreds of posts of nerd nonsense.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30413762</id>
	<title>congrats!</title>
	<author>Asaf.Zamir</author>
	<datestamp>1260631800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Congratulations! I've been surfing this website for about 6-7 years, my main resource for computer-news<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations !
I 've been surfing this website for about 6-7 years , my main resource for computer-news : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations!
I've been surfing this website for about 6-7 years, my main resource for computer-news :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409106</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>openfrog</author>
	<datestamp>1260538440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I credit the moderation system.</p></div><p>Of course, and as others have said, who choose to use and to read Slashdot in the first place. It is a very interesting community and I would believe, vastly more influential than what is suggested by the conventionally self-deprecating comments.</p><p>I love Slashdot so much that I often find myself worried about the possibility of organized attempts to manipulate the system. The next topic (the 100, 001st):  Virtual Money For Real Lobbying, address this very issue, but about other discussion groups. I must say that I am reassured most of the time by the efficiency of the moderating system, with one recent exception: the issue of climate change, on which there have been 5 or 6 stories over the last few days. I admit the topic is controversial to begin with, but the comments I have seen modded down, with the intelligence and tone associated with the scientific minds whom we are used to read around here, and some comments I have seen modded up, left me with the impression of a massive attempt at manipulating the moderation system, only partially successful perhaps.</p><p>My immediate reaction was to reflect on what form of comment analysis, statistical or otherwise, would allow confirmation or infirmation of such coordinated attempts. Anyone has an idea on that?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I credit the moderation system.Of course , and as others have said , who choose to use and to read Slashdot in the first place .
It is a very interesting community and I would believe , vastly more influential than what is suggested by the conventionally self-deprecating comments.I love Slashdot so much that I often find myself worried about the possibility of organized attempts to manipulate the system .
The next topic ( the 100 , 001st ) : Virtual Money For Real Lobbying , address this very issue , but about other discussion groups .
I must say that I am reassured most of the time by the efficiency of the moderating system , with one recent exception : the issue of climate change , on which there have been 5 or 6 stories over the last few days .
I admit the topic is controversial to begin with , but the comments I have seen modded down , with the intelligence and tone associated with the scientific minds whom we are used to read around here , and some comments I have seen modded up , left me with the impression of a massive attempt at manipulating the moderation system , only partially successful perhaps.My immediate reaction was to reflect on what form of comment analysis , statistical or otherwise , would allow confirmation or infirmation of such coordinated attempts .
Anyone has an idea on that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I credit the moderation system.Of course, and as others have said, who choose to use and to read Slashdot in the first place.
It is a very interesting community and I would believe, vastly more influential than what is suggested by the conventionally self-deprecating comments.I love Slashdot so much that I often find myself worried about the possibility of organized attempts to manipulate the system.
The next topic (the 100, 001st):  Virtual Money For Real Lobbying, address this very issue, but about other discussion groups.
I must say that I am reassured most of the time by the efficiency of the moderating system, with one recent exception: the issue of climate change, on which there have been 5 or 6 stories over the last few days.
I admit the topic is controversial to begin with, but the comments I have seen modded down, with the intelligence and tone associated with the scientific minds whom we are used to read around here, and some comments I have seen modded up, left me with the impression of a massive attempt at manipulating the moderation system, only partially successful perhaps.My immediate reaction was to reflect on what form of comment analysis, statistical or otherwise, would allow confirmation or infirmation of such coordinated attempts.
Anyone has an idea on that?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408552</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260534840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The probability of receiving moderation powers is inversely proportional to the frequency for which you post on Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The probability of receiving moderation powers is inversely proportional to the frequency for which you post on Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The probability of receiving moderation powers is inversely proportional to the frequency for which you post on Slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408874</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>thoth</author>
	<datestamp>1260536820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember a few times the "low UID" issue came up (for no other reason than asking who's got a low uid??)</p><p>Somebody was bragging about their low UID (2 digits) and Taco responded "pwned".<br>Another time the discussion was about if people with low UID's posted useful info, and user #11 (I think) said "nope just pointless comments really".<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>I see Palpatine posted below, #94 that's pretty low!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember a few times the " low UID " issue came up ( for no other reason than asking who 's got a low uid ? ?
) Somebody was bragging about their low UID ( 2 digits ) and Taco responded " pwned " .Another time the discussion was about if people with low UID 's posted useful info , and user # 11 ( I think ) said " nope just pointless comments really " .
; ) I see Palpatine posted below , # 94 that 's pretty low !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember a few times the "low UID" issue came up (for no other reason than asking who's got a low uid??
)Somebody was bragging about their low UID (2 digits) and Taco responded "pwned".Another time the discussion was about if people with low UID's posted useful info, and user #11 (I think) said "nope just pointless comments really".
;)I see Palpatine posted below, #94 that's pretty low!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409240</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>sn00ker</author>
	<datestamp>1260539580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oblig: you must be new here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oblig : you must be new here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oblig: you must be new here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30415038</id>
	<title>timothy</title>
	<author>wdr1</author>
	<datestamp>1260641340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>timothy is one of the reasons I rarely come to slashdot anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>timothy is one of the reasons I rarely come to slashdot anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>timothy is one of the reasons I rarely come to slashdot anymore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409096</id>
	<title>Re:CmdrTaco</title>
	<author>juuri</author>
	<datestamp>1260538320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think it was pretty obvious, he was speaking to the forced "mainstream" links and articles which were foisted upon Slashdot a few years back.</p><p>For some examples see the entire "Idle" section.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think it was pretty obvious , he was speaking to the forced " mainstream " links and articles which were foisted upon Slashdot a few years back.For some examples see the entire " Idle " section .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think it was pretty obvious, he was speaking to the forced "mainstream" links and articles which were foisted upon Slashdot a few years back.For some examples see the entire "Idle" section.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411470</id>
	<title>Cheers!</title>
	<author>chucklebutte</author>
	<datestamp>1260557880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cheers!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cheers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cheers!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410696</id>
	<title>Does this count reposts?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260550560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suspect the "unique story" count is closer to 20,000.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect the " unique story " count is closer to 20,000 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect the "unique story" count is closer to 20,000.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30413902</id>
	<title>Re:CmdrTaco</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260632880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, his fault for not adding a image embedding function and calling it 4chan.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , his fault for not adding a image embedding function and calling it 4chan .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, his fault for not adding a image embedding function and calling it 4chan.
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408244</id>
	<title>100,001st post!</title>
	<author>bennomatic</author>
	<datestamp>1260533460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somehow, it doesn't have the same ring to it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow , it does n't have the same ring to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow, it doesn't have the same ring to it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30427892</id>
	<title>2 Cents From A Nerd...</title>
	<author>jyuschak</author>
	<datestamp>1260724440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hardly post here on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. that often, but seeing this post and the throngs of replies regarding quality of comments, I felt that I wanted to reply with my own experiences.</p><p>It was 10 years ago that I started my college career at Drexel University and I was the absolute loneliest kid you could find on that campus. I didn't know a soul and I had quite a hard time making friends. Now, I can't remember exactly how I found you, but after reading "News For Nerds" I felt at home. And after going through all the posts, news stories, fellow readers &amp; posters, I felt better about myself. In a sea of unfamiliarity, there was Slashdot. It was my anchor, it was my warm blanket that make me comfortable. I can hardly describe how much better my freshman year felt having<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. with me. It meant a lot to me 10 years ago, and it means a lot to me now.</p><p>There are those that will tell you things have changed, that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. isn't the same. But like anything, change is inevitable. And I definitely think the changes that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. have experienced are, for the most part, positive. The new Web 2.0 look, the comment filter bars, the pictures in the articles; I view them as welcomed additions.</p><p>Slashdot is something special. Of all the things I hold a special place for in my heart, I never thought I'd feel this way about a website. But I do. The people here are amazing. Without realizing it, you guys &amp; girls here have helped me through some of the most difficult times in my life. I love Ask Slashdot. I love the book reviews. I love the news.</p><p>Over the past decade, Slashdot has definitely changed, but it still feels like home. It's still here. And for that, I thank all of you. The creators, the members, the anon cowards. Just... thank you, all of you. I sincerely hope you continue to exist right here for another decade. Regardless of whatever browsers come and go, you'll always be the first in my favorites.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hardly post here on / .
that often , but seeing this post and the throngs of replies regarding quality of comments , I felt that I wanted to reply with my own experiences.It was 10 years ago that I started my college career at Drexel University and I was the absolute loneliest kid you could find on that campus .
I did n't know a soul and I had quite a hard time making friends .
Now , I ca n't remember exactly how I found you , but after reading " News For Nerds " I felt at home .
And after going through all the posts , news stories , fellow readers &amp; posters , I felt better about myself .
In a sea of unfamiliarity , there was Slashdot .
It was my anchor , it was my warm blanket that make me comfortable .
I can hardly describe how much better my freshman year felt having / .
with me .
It meant a lot to me 10 years ago , and it means a lot to me now.There are those that will tell you things have changed , that / .
is n't the same .
But like anything , change is inevitable .
And I definitely think the changes that / .
have experienced are , for the most part , positive .
The new Web 2.0 look , the comment filter bars , the pictures in the articles ; I view them as welcomed additions.Slashdot is something special .
Of all the things I hold a special place for in my heart , I never thought I 'd feel this way about a website .
But I do .
The people here are amazing .
Without realizing it , you guys &amp; girls here have helped me through some of the most difficult times in my life .
I love Ask Slashdot .
I love the book reviews .
I love the news.Over the past decade , Slashdot has definitely changed , but it still feels like home .
It 's still here .
And for that , I thank all of you .
The creators , the members , the anon cowards .
Just... thank you , all of you .
I sincerely hope you continue to exist right here for another decade .
Regardless of whatever browsers come and go , you 'll always be the first in my favorites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hardly post here on /.
that often, but seeing this post and the throngs of replies regarding quality of comments, I felt that I wanted to reply with my own experiences.It was 10 years ago that I started my college career at Drexel University and I was the absolute loneliest kid you could find on that campus.
I didn't know a soul and I had quite a hard time making friends.
Now, I can't remember exactly how I found you, but after reading "News For Nerds" I felt at home.
And after going through all the posts, news stories, fellow readers &amp; posters, I felt better about myself.
In a sea of unfamiliarity, there was Slashdot.
It was my anchor, it was my warm blanket that make me comfortable.
I can hardly describe how much better my freshman year felt having /.
with me.
It meant a lot to me 10 years ago, and it means a lot to me now.There are those that will tell you things have changed, that /.
isn't the same.
But like anything, change is inevitable.
And I definitely think the changes that /.
have experienced are, for the most part, positive.
The new Web 2.0 look, the comment filter bars, the pictures in the articles; I view them as welcomed additions.Slashdot is something special.
Of all the things I hold a special place for in my heart, I never thought I'd feel this way about a website.
But I do.
The people here are amazing.
Without realizing it, you guys &amp; girls here have helped me through some of the most difficult times in my life.
I love Ask Slashdot.
I love the book reviews.
I love the news.Over the past decade, Slashdot has definitely changed, but it still feels like home.
It's still here.
And for that, I thank all of you.
The creators, the members, the anon cowards.
Just... thank you, all of you.
I sincerely hope you continue to exist right here for another decade.
Regardless of whatever browsers come and go, you'll always be the first in my favorites.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409312</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>ascari</author>
	<datestamp>1260540060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't forget the car analogies. Invaluable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget the car analogies .
Invaluable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget the car analogies.
Invaluable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30419574</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Akira Kogami</author>
	<datestamp>1260635940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The scarcity of mod points helps a lot with the type of posts that get upvoted. I mean, I just saw a Digg article (well, picture) where the most dugg comment was "Ha Ha! That was pretty hilarious...and true.", in response to some 4chan meme image. The good thing about limited upvoting is that people will usually only upvote comments that are either particularly witty or of substance, not thoughtless drivel that inspires no conversation at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The scarcity of mod points helps a lot with the type of posts that get upvoted .
I mean , I just saw a Digg article ( well , picture ) where the most dugg comment was " Ha Ha !
That was pretty hilarious...and true .
" , in response to some 4chan meme image .
The good thing about limited upvoting is that people will usually only upvote comments that are either particularly witty or of substance , not thoughtless drivel that inspires no conversation at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The scarcity of mod points helps a lot with the type of posts that get upvoted.
I mean, I just saw a Digg article (well, picture) where the most dugg comment was "Ha Ha!
That was pretty hilarious...and true.
", in response to some 4chan meme image.
The good thing about limited upvoting is that people will usually only upvote comments that are either particularly witty or of substance, not thoughtless drivel that inspires no conversation at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408384</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260534060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>third post?!</p><p>I am curious to find which one of us reading this has the lowest account number?  I had a really low one but lost that account..</p></div><p>I think everyone under a 100 is dead? I guess there's still one "WW I" soldier left so there could still be one or two out there.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>third post ?
! I am curious to find which one of us reading this has the lowest account number ?
I had a really low one but lost that account..I think everyone under a 100 is dead ?
I guess there 's still one " WW I " soldier left so there could still be one or two out there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>third post?
!I am curious to find which one of us reading this has the lowest account number?
I had a really low one but lost that account..I think everyone under a 100 is dead?
I guess there's still one "WW I" soldier left so there could still be one or two out there.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408266</id>
	<title>However</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1260533520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you strip out the duplicates, it's about half that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you strip out the duplicates , it 's about half that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you strip out the duplicates, it's about half that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410602</id>
	<title>Probably not</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260549720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Minus the dupes and slashvertisements and I bet we're not there yet</htmltext>
<tokenext>Minus the dupes and slashvertisements and I bet we 're not there yet</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Minus the dupes and slashvertisements and I bet we're not there yet</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409010</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>ctmurray</author>
	<datestamp>1260537720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would appreciate some more understanding of how the mod system works. Like many that posted, I recently got some, but there was a long dry spell. My karma is excellent. But I did have advertising turned off and wondered if that affected my chances. Recently I made a comment that was pretty funny and was modded up as so, then I got some mod points. So do my mod points depend on my posts being modded up? I post and comment regularly, but as we all know, not every post gets read or commented. But I was also trying an experiment where I did not disable the ads at the same time my post got modded up - so I don't know if either was the key. I looked around for more information about the mod point system but failed to find anything in more in the FAQ (I read the FAQ but it does not answer these types of questions).<br> <br> Congratulations to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. and I agree the articles are mostly interesting, I have learned quite a bit, and I enjoy each evening going through the stories.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would appreciate some more understanding of how the mod system works .
Like many that posted , I recently got some , but there was a long dry spell .
My karma is excellent .
But I did have advertising turned off and wondered if that affected my chances .
Recently I made a comment that was pretty funny and was modded up as so , then I got some mod points .
So do my mod points depend on my posts being modded up ?
I post and comment regularly , but as we all know , not every post gets read or commented .
But I was also trying an experiment where I did not disable the ads at the same time my post got modded up - so I do n't know if either was the key .
I looked around for more information about the mod point system but failed to find anything in more in the FAQ ( I read the FAQ but it does not answer these types of questions ) .
Congratulations to / .
and I agree the articles are mostly interesting , I have learned quite a bit , and I enjoy each evening going through the stories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would appreciate some more understanding of how the mod system works.
Like many that posted, I recently got some, but there was a long dry spell.
My karma is excellent.
But I did have advertising turned off and wondered if that affected my chances.
Recently I made a comment that was pretty funny and was modded up as so, then I got some mod points.
So do my mod points depend on my posts being modded up?
I post and comment regularly, but as we all know, not every post gets read or commented.
But I was also trying an experiment where I did not disable the ads at the same time my post got modded up - so I don't know if either was the key.
I looked around for more information about the mod point system but failed to find anything in more in the FAQ (I read the FAQ but it does not answer these types of questions).
Congratulations to /.
and I agree the articles are mostly interesting, I have learned quite a bit, and I enjoy each evening going through the stories.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408850</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>bertoelcon</author>
	<datestamp>1260536640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>When did you find the time to log on? Aren't there kids in your lawn that need to be told get off?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When did you find the time to log on ?
Are n't there kids in your lawn that need to be told get off ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When did you find the time to log on?
Aren't there kids in your lawn that need to be told get off?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410362</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>maotx</author>
	<datestamp>1260547860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>100,000th story, what's the comment count at?  30408632?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>100,000th story , what 's the comment count at ?
30408632 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>100,000th story, what's the comment count at?
30408632?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409798</id>
	<title>Congrats Taco, thanks everyone else</title>
	<author>Maow</author>
	<datestamp>1260543240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can only reiterate what's been said before:</p><p>I've learned more from +5 comments than anywhere else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can only reiterate what 's been said before : I 've learned more from + 5 comments than anywhere else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can only reiterate what's been said before:I've learned more from +5 comments than anywhere else.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412266</id>
	<title>People who do not participate also love /.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260615000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have been reading<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. for years and still haven't got myself an account. Not for any particular reason really -- never felt the need for it. I just read -- sometimes chuckle, sometimes curse and many times learn. This is my first post because I felt a moral obligation to congratulate a fantastic site. The reasons I think<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. is great are:<br>1. The technology does not obscure the content. There is no flashy avatars, spinning buttons, multiple webparts... no Web x.0 bull crap<br>2. There is limited juvenile behavior on the site (no "lol", "whatever",...). People write their point of view in plan English -- something which everyone can understand and react to. It seems in today's day and age the power of rational debate is getting drowned in the omnipotent "whatever" comment.<br>3.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. is an excellent place to procrastinate. The dialogue is intelligent, the trivia is good and you may actually learn something useful<br>4. The moderation system obviously works because I haven't seen a better quality of comments anywhere else<br>5. It's actually a good place to keep tabs on what's happening in the technology space and hear the different points of view</p><p>Keep up the fantastic work guys ! I hope whatever form Slashdot is in 10 years from now, it stills retains its core essence.</p><p>Hmmmm... maybe I should sign up for that account or maybe I will procrastinate on that task by reading Slashdot !!??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been reading / .
for years and still have n't got myself an account .
Not for any particular reason really -- never felt the need for it .
I just read -- sometimes chuckle , sometimes curse and many times learn .
This is my first post because I felt a moral obligation to congratulate a fantastic site .
The reasons I think / .
is great are : 1 .
The technology does not obscure the content .
There is no flashy avatars , spinning buttons , multiple webparts... no Web x.0 bull crap2 .
There is limited juvenile behavior on the site ( no " lol " , " whatever " ,... ) .
People write their point of view in plan English -- something which everyone can understand and react to .
It seems in today 's day and age the power of rational debate is getting drowned in the omnipotent " whatever " comment.3 .
/. is an excellent place to procrastinate .
The dialogue is intelligent , the trivia is good and you may actually learn something useful4 .
The moderation system obviously works because I have n't seen a better quality of comments anywhere else5 .
It 's actually a good place to keep tabs on what 's happening in the technology space and hear the different points of viewKeep up the fantastic work guys !
I hope whatever form Slashdot is in 10 years from now , it stills retains its core essence.Hmmmm... maybe I should sign up for that account or maybe I will procrastinate on that task by reading Slashdot ! ! ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been reading /.
for years and still haven't got myself an account.
Not for any particular reason really -- never felt the need for it.
I just read -- sometimes chuckle, sometimes curse and many times learn.
This is my first post because I felt a moral obligation to congratulate a fantastic site.
The reasons I think /.
is great are:1.
The technology does not obscure the content.
There is no flashy avatars, spinning buttons, multiple webparts... no Web x.0 bull crap2.
There is limited juvenile behavior on the site (no "lol", "whatever",...).
People write their point of view in plan English -- something which everyone can understand and react to.
It seems in today's day and age the power of rational debate is getting drowned in the omnipotent "whatever" comment.3.
/. is an excellent place to procrastinate.
The dialogue is intelligent, the trivia is good and you may actually learn something useful4.
The moderation system obviously works because I haven't seen a better quality of comments anywhere else5.
It's actually a good place to keep tabs on what's happening in the technology space and hear the different points of viewKeep up the fantastic work guys !
I hope whatever form Slashdot is in 10 years from now, it stills retains its core essence.Hmmmm... maybe I should sign up for that account or maybe I will procrastinate on that task by reading Slashdot !!?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410586</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>volsung</author>
	<datestamp>1260549600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, you definitely win there.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , you definitely win there .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, you definitely win there.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260533460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I credit the moderation system.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I credit the moderation system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I credit the moderation system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408906</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>TheKidWho</author>
	<datestamp>1260537060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1-2 per week? I tend to get 15 a week at minimum...</p><p>I always wondered how often others got mod points.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1-2 per week ?
I tend to get 15 a week at minimum...I always wondered how often others got mod points .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1-2 per week?
I tend to get 15 a week at minimum...I always wondered how often others got mod points.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408608</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Valdrax</author>
	<datestamp>1260535200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You mean the same moderating system that hasn't given me mod points in 4 or 5 years?</p></div><p>I don't know what's up with you, but I get mod points about 1-2 per week.</p><p>Hmm... Maybe this is a sign of Slashdot's quality, after all!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean the same moderating system that has n't given me mod points in 4 or 5 years ? I do n't know what 's up with you , but I get mod points about 1-2 per week.Hmm... Maybe this is a sign of Slashdot 's quality , after all !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean the same moderating system that hasn't given me mod points in 4 or 5 years?I don't know what's up with you, but I get mod points about 1-2 per week.Hmm... Maybe this is a sign of Slashdot's quality, after all!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408462</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1260534420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext> Maybe more than lowest account number (mine isnt that high, but surely won't be the lowest one) what really matter is to be in this community all this years, since 1997.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe more than lowest account number ( mine isnt that high , but surely wo n't be the lowest one ) what really matter is to be in this community all this years , since 1997 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Maybe more than lowest account number (mine isnt that high, but surely won't be the lowest one) what really matter is to be in this community all this years, since 1997.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410088</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260545460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was a friend of friend of Taco and thus able to comment in his journals.   I ripped him a new one for some faggoty journal entry he made.  He then defriended robogoatgruff (uid 20, my friend of a friend of taco) so I couldn't comment in his journals and I have since never had mod points.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was a friend of friend of Taco and thus able to comment in his journals .
I ripped him a new one for some faggoty journal entry he made .
He then defriended robogoatgruff ( uid 20 , my friend of a friend of taco ) so I could n't comment in his journals and I have since never had mod points .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was a friend of friend of Taco and thus able to comment in his journals.
I ripped him a new one for some faggoty journal entry he made.
He then defriended robogoatgruff (uid 20, my friend of a friend of taco) so I couldn't comment in his journals and I have since never had mod points.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408616</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>stefanlasiewski</author>
	<datestamp>1260535260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, that one. Apparently it's been giving me all your mod points. Most weeks, I get more mod points then I can have time for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , that one .
Apparently it 's been giving me all your mod points .
Most weeks , I get more mod points then I can have time for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, that one.
Apparently it's been giving me all your mod points.
Most weeks, I get more mod points then I can have time for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409006</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>zenwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1260537720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I credit geeks being geeks and thus (thankfully) frightening today's typical internet user away from<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I credit geeks being geeks and thus ( thankfully ) frightening today 's typical internet user away from / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I credit geeks being geeks and thus (thankfully) frightening today's typical internet user away from /.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408242</id>
	<title>Oh thats why its been a downhill slope with /.</title>
	<author>Servaas</author>
	<datestamp>1260533400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>After the first story post you thought, what the heck lets use fill up to get to 100.000.

That explains some of the weird stuff that has been posted like:

[Citation needed]

Or for example

[Citation needed]

Fun stuff but really.
What was the first story posted by the way?</htmltext>
<tokenext>After the first story post you thought , what the heck lets use fill up to get to 100.000 .
That explains some of the weird stuff that has been posted like : [ Citation needed ] Or for example [ Citation needed ] Fun stuff but really .
What was the first story posted by the way ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After the first story post you thought, what the heck lets use fill up to get to 100.000.
That explains some of the weird stuff that has been posted like:

[Citation needed]

Or for example

[Citation needed]

Fun stuff but really.
What was the first story posted by the way?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408288</id>
	<title>12 Years?!?</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1260533640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's shocking to know this site was up before I had my own email account.</p><p>I will proceed with getting off of CmdrTaco's Lawn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's shocking to know this site was up before I had my own email account.I will proceed with getting off of CmdrTaco 's Lawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's shocking to know this site was up before I had my own email account.I will proceed with getting off of CmdrTaco's Lawn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30421260</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>penguinchris</author>
	<datestamp>1260697140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I noticed the same thing in one of the climate articles - the "skeptic" viewpoint was being modded up and others were being modded down, even when the skeptic was on a clearly losing side of an argument.</p><p>Even if moderation in that thread devolved to simple agreeing or disagreeing with the poster, I find it hard to believe that the majority of slashdotters who had mod points agree with the "skeptics" more than everyone (including scientists) who were posting logical rebuttals and better information. Browsing at +2 or higher means seeing only the "skeptic" side of the argument, and it's not because they are correct or made better posts!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I noticed the same thing in one of the climate articles - the " skeptic " viewpoint was being modded up and others were being modded down , even when the skeptic was on a clearly losing side of an argument.Even if moderation in that thread devolved to simple agreeing or disagreeing with the poster , I find it hard to believe that the majority of slashdotters who had mod points agree with the " skeptics " more than everyone ( including scientists ) who were posting logical rebuttals and better information .
Browsing at + 2 or higher means seeing only the " skeptic " side of the argument , and it 's not because they are correct or made better posts !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I noticed the same thing in one of the climate articles - the "skeptic" viewpoint was being modded up and others were being modded down, even when the skeptic was on a clearly losing side of an argument.Even if moderation in that thread devolved to simple agreeing or disagreeing with the poster, I find it hard to believe that the majority of slashdotters who had mod points agree with the "skeptics" more than everyone (including scientists) who were posting logical rebuttals and better information.
Browsing at +2 or higher means seeing only the "skeptic" side of the argument, and it's not because they are correct or made better posts!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412532</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1260618420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I could have had a very low account number indeed, but at that time I was all about anonymity and I thought it was stupid to register for an account at ANY website.  If I had to put a name, I'd just choose a random name or look around the room for objects.  I posted anonymous for a long time on Slashdot until it got abused excessively and default score threshold went up to 1.  Ah, when goatsex was a new and funny joke.  Why do you think everyone knows what it is?  Then, after it became increasingly obvious that nobody read <tt>score: 0</tt> comments, including the moderators, I finally registered for an account, choosing the name from a book that happened to be on my shelf at the time.  Remember when Slashdot karma was a numeric value and people were putting the score on their resumes?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I could have had a very low account number indeed , but at that time I was all about anonymity and I thought it was stupid to register for an account at ANY website .
If I had to put a name , I 'd just choose a random name or look around the room for objects .
I posted anonymous for a long time on Slashdot until it got abused excessively and default score threshold went up to 1 .
Ah , when goatsex was a new and funny joke .
Why do you think everyone knows what it is ?
Then , after it became increasingly obvious that nobody read score : 0 comments , including the moderators , I finally registered for an account , choosing the name from a book that happened to be on my shelf at the time .
Remember when Slashdot karma was a numeric value and people were putting the score on their resumes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could have had a very low account number indeed, but at that time I was all about anonymity and I thought it was stupid to register for an account at ANY website.
If I had to put a name, I'd just choose a random name or look around the room for objects.
I posted anonymous for a long time on Slashdot until it got abused excessively and default score threshold went up to 1.
Ah, when goatsex was a new and funny joke.
Why do you think everyone knows what it is?
Then, after it became increasingly obvious that nobody read score: 0 comments, including the moderators, I finally registered for an account, choosing the name from a book that happened to be on my shelf at the time.
Remember when Slashdot karma was a numeric value and people were putting the score on their resumes?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30413800</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260632040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of <em>course</em> it doesn&rsquo;t give you mod points. The FAQ clearly states, that the ones who get points, are in the middle. The very old and very new ones don&rsquo;t get points anymore. It also states a half-assed reason for this.</p><p>But then again, I hope that was the point of your joke and I just wooshed myself. Or else you must have bought that account and must be new here! ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course it doesn    t give you mod points .
The FAQ clearly states , that the ones who get points , are in the middle .
The very old and very new ones don    t get points anymore .
It also states a half-assed reason for this.But then again , I hope that was the point of your joke and I just wooshed myself .
Or else you must have bought that account and must be new here !
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course it doesn’t give you mod points.
The FAQ clearly states, that the ones who get points, are in the middle.
The very old and very new ones don’t get points anymore.
It also states a half-assed reason for this.But then again, I hope that was the point of your joke and I just wooshed myself.
Or else you must have bought that account and must be new here!
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408322</id>
	<title>Plus or minus one?</title>
	<author>mfnickster</author>
	<datestamp>1260533820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does that 100,000 include the <i>Star Wars Christmas Special</i> story which mysteriously disappeared yesterday?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does that 100,000 include the Star Wars Christmas Special story which mysteriously disappeared yesterday ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does that 100,000 include the Star Wars Christmas Special story which mysteriously disappeared yesterday?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408642</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>Mister Whirly</author>
	<datestamp>1260535500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Weird, I get them at least 4-5 times a month. How is your Karma?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Weird , I get them at least 4-5 times a month .
How is your Karma ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weird, I get them at least 4-5 times a month.
How is your Karma?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30415428</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>OverlordQ</author>
	<datestamp>1260643860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I haven't had mod points in about 5+ years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't had mod points in about 5 + years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't had mod points in about 5+ years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408578</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409758</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>jc42</author>
	<datestamp>1260543060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah; I've been getting 2 or even 3 15-point mod sessions per week for a while now.  One thing it makes me think of is that I don't really understand all that much of how<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.'s mod system really works.  Is it actually documented somewhere that we can read?  I haven't found anything that I'd call very informative about the mod system.</p><p>Part of the reason I'm interested is that some friends and other acquaintances have recently asked me about building some online news/blog sites for a couple of local organizations. Doing the basic programming seems rather straightforward, but I suspect that there are some subtleties for which it'd be best to learn from others.  I'd want to include some sort of moderation system, so I'd like to read about some experiences with such things.  Both successful and unsuccessful ideas would be useful. It'd probably be better than me making guesses about how to do it.</p><p>I did look into slashcode, but found that the documentation seems scarce, and apparently nobody is feeding and watering it any more.  I also did a bit of googling, but didn't find much useful.  Maybe I just didn't guess the right keywords<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Anyway, if the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. editors have produced any sort of history of what they've tried, what worked, and what didn't, it could be interesting reading to some of us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah ; I 've been getting 2 or even 3 15-point mod sessions per week for a while now .
One thing it makes me think of is that I do n't really understand all that much of how / .
's mod system really works .
Is it actually documented somewhere that we can read ?
I have n't found anything that I 'd call very informative about the mod system.Part of the reason I 'm interested is that some friends and other acquaintances have recently asked me about building some online news/blog sites for a couple of local organizations .
Doing the basic programming seems rather straightforward , but I suspect that there are some subtleties for which it 'd be best to learn from others .
I 'd want to include some sort of moderation system , so I 'd like to read about some experiences with such things .
Both successful and unsuccessful ideas would be useful .
It 'd probably be better than me making guesses about how to do it.I did look into slashcode , but found that the documentation seems scarce , and apparently nobody is feeding and watering it any more .
I also did a bit of googling , but did n't find much useful .
Maybe I just did n't guess the right keywords ...Anyway , if the / .
editors have produced any sort of history of what they 've tried , what worked , and what did n't , it could be interesting reading to some of us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah; I've been getting 2 or even 3 15-point mod sessions per week for a while now.
One thing it makes me think of is that I don't really understand all that much of how /.
's mod system really works.
Is it actually documented somewhere that we can read?
I haven't found anything that I'd call very informative about the mod system.Part of the reason I'm interested is that some friends and other acquaintances have recently asked me about building some online news/blog sites for a couple of local organizations.
Doing the basic programming seems rather straightforward, but I suspect that there are some subtleties for which it'd be best to learn from others.
I'd want to include some sort of moderation system, so I'd like to read about some experiences with such things.
Both successful and unsuccessful ideas would be useful.
It'd probably be better than me making guesses about how to do it.I did look into slashcode, but found that the documentation seems scarce, and apparently nobody is feeding and watering it any more.
I also did a bit of googling, but didn't find much useful.
Maybe I just didn't guess the right keywords ...Anyway, if the /.
editors have produced any sort of history of what they've tried, what worked, and what didn't, it could be interesting reading to some of us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408578</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>DAldredge</author>
	<datestamp>1260534000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You mean the same moderating system that hasn't given me mod points in 4 or 5 years?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean the same moderating system that has n't given me mod points in 4 or 5 years ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean the same moderating system that hasn't given me mod points in 4 or 5 years?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408772</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>russlar</author>
	<datestamp>1260536280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You mean the same moderating system that hasn't given me mod points in 4 or 5 years?</p></div><p>You can have mine.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean the same moderating system that has n't given me mod points in 4 or 5 years ? You can have mine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean the same moderating system that hasn't given me mod points in 4 or 5 years?You can have mine.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410924</id>
	<title>Re:lowest account number?</title>
	<author>Owyn</author>
	<datestamp>1260552180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, that's pretty good.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , that 's pretty good .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, that's pretty good.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410932</id>
	<title>a reply</title>
	<author>MacII</author>
	<datestamp>1260552240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet , consectetur adipisicing elit , sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua .
Ut enim ad minim veniam , quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat .
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur .
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident , sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408198</id>
	<title>Here's to the next 100000</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260533160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://goatse.cx/" title="goatse.cx" rel="nofollow">Go slashdot!</a> [goatse.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Go slashdot !
[ goatse.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go slashdot!
[goatse.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412264</id>
	<title>Congratulations!</title>
	<author>Fantastic Lad</author>
	<datestamp>1260615000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just a chime-in.</p><p>You guys do a truly great job!</p><p>I really appreciate this site, as I know many people do.  It draws a fantastic mix of knowledge/experience spheres from thousands of individuals, allowing us to collectively learn about the world and put all manner of current information through a tremendous crucible of cross-analysis from countless different perspectives so that we can quickly work out what is really going on out there in the big, ol' world, --and all with humor and zest.  It makes learning FUN!  I've learned SO many things here, both wonderful and painful lessons about the world and myself; The internet would be a far less grand place without Slashdot.  And I'm not even exaggerating.  You guys rock!</p><p>Thank-you!</p><p>-FL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a chime-in.You guys do a truly great job ! I really appreciate this site , as I know many people do .
It draws a fantastic mix of knowledge/experience spheres from thousands of individuals , allowing us to collectively learn about the world and put all manner of current information through a tremendous crucible of cross-analysis from countless different perspectives so that we can quickly work out what is really going on out there in the big , ol ' world , --and all with humor and zest .
It makes learning FUN !
I 've learned SO many things here , both wonderful and painful lessons about the world and myself ; The internet would be a far less grand place without Slashdot .
And I 'm not even exaggerating .
You guys rock ! Thank-you ! -FL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a chime-in.You guys do a truly great job!I really appreciate this site, as I know many people do.
It draws a fantastic mix of knowledge/experience spheres from thousands of individuals, allowing us to collectively learn about the world and put all manner of current information through a tremendous crucible of cross-analysis from countless different perspectives so that we can quickly work out what is really going on out there in the big, ol' world, --and all with humor and zest.
It makes learning FUN!
I've learned SO many things here, both wonderful and painful lessons about the world and myself; The internet would be a far less grand place without Slashdot.
And I'm not even exaggerating.
You guys rock!Thank-you!-FL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30413088</id>
	<title>Re:Age and quality.</title>
	<author>dkf</author>
	<datestamp>1260625140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You mean the same moderating system that hasn't given me mod points in 4 or 5 years?</p></div><p>The slashdot system seems to be relatively hard on people who post one-liner smartass comments all the time. If we look back through your <a href="//slashdot.org/~DAldredge" title="slashdot.org">recent history</a> [slashdot.org] then we don't see a lot that is likely to attract the karma-positive moderations. I suspect it also helps if you include a little context with <tt>&lt;quote&gt;</tt>s of what you're talking about. Otherwise it is too easy for people doing metamodding to not understand what you're talking about (no, you don't need to quote the whole lot. Just the relevant sentence or two).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean the same moderating system that has n't given me mod points in 4 or 5 years ? The slashdot system seems to be relatively hard on people who post one-liner smartass comments all the time .
If we look back through your recent history [ slashdot.org ] then we do n't see a lot that is likely to attract the karma-positive moderations .
I suspect it also helps if you include a little context with s of what you 're talking about .
Otherwise it is too easy for people doing metamodding to not understand what you 're talking about ( no , you do n't need to quote the whole lot .
Just the relevant sentence or two ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean the same moderating system that hasn't given me mod points in 4 or 5 years?The slashdot system seems to be relatively hard on people who post one-liner smartass comments all the time.
If we look back through your recent history [slashdot.org] then we don't see a lot that is likely to attract the karma-positive moderations.
I suspect it also helps if you include a little context with s of what you're talking about.
Otherwise it is too easy for people doing metamodding to not understand what you're talking about (no, you don't need to quote the whole lot.
Just the relevant sentence or two).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30416064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30413902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30415428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30421260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30413800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30414136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30415536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30419574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30413088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1615202_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408558
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30413902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30416064
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412494
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409454
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409836
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409232
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408568
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408436
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410924
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30414136
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410586
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408874
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408288
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408208
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408242
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30415038
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408818
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409798
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408252
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408876
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409170
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409006
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409390
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410800
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412878
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411834
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30411480
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412904
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409106
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30421260
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409312
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408372
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408446
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408552
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410088
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408522
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408830
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30419574
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30415536
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408642
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30413088
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408616
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408632
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409940
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410362
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409340
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408608
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408906
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30413800
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409240
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408900
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30412206
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408772
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408778
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409028
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408578
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409758
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30415428
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408744
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30410076
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30409168
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1615202.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1615202.30408210
</commentlist>
</conversation>
