<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_10_2115238</id>
	<title>Best Way To Clear Your Name Online?</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1260436860000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"About fifteen years ago, I did something that I've come to regret on a university computer system. I was subsequently interviewed by a Federal law enforcement agency, although no charges were pressed and I have no criminal record as a result of my actions. At the time, I discussed the matter with a friend of mine who went on to mention it briefly in a text file zine with a small distribution list. I've generally tried to keep a low profile online and until recently there's been very little information about me available from the major search engines. Unfortunately, that zine mention was picked up by textfiles.com at some point and mirrored across the world. I've tried to address this with the owner of the site, but couldn't get anywhere. Even if my name in the source file is altered, cached copies will continue to link me with my youthful mistake. Have any other Slashdot readers had a similar experience? What practical steps would your readers recommend to prevent this information from hurting me? I am concerned that future employers may hold my past actions against me should they look for me online as part of their screening process."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " About fifteen years ago , I did something that I 've come to regret on a university computer system .
I was subsequently interviewed by a Federal law enforcement agency , although no charges were pressed and I have no criminal record as a result of my actions .
At the time , I discussed the matter with a friend of mine who went on to mention it briefly in a text file zine with a small distribution list .
I 've generally tried to keep a low profile online and until recently there 's been very little information about me available from the major search engines .
Unfortunately , that zine mention was picked up by textfiles.com at some point and mirrored across the world .
I 've tried to address this with the owner of the site , but could n't get anywhere .
Even if my name in the source file is altered , cached copies will continue to link me with my youthful mistake .
Have any other Slashdot readers had a similar experience ?
What practical steps would your readers recommend to prevent this information from hurting me ?
I am concerned that future employers may hold my past actions against me should they look for me online as part of their screening process .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "About fifteen years ago, I did something that I've come to regret on a university computer system.
I was subsequently interviewed by a Federal law enforcement agency, although no charges were pressed and I have no criminal record as a result of my actions.
At the time, I discussed the matter with a friend of mine who went on to mention it briefly in a text file zine with a small distribution list.
I've generally tried to keep a low profile online and until recently there's been very little information about me available from the major search engines.
Unfortunately, that zine mention was picked up by textfiles.com at some point and mirrored across the world.
I've tried to address this with the owner of the site, but couldn't get anywhere.
Even if my name in the source file is altered, cached copies will continue to link me with my youthful mistake.
Have any other Slashdot readers had a similar experience?
What practical steps would your readers recommend to prevent this information from hurting me?
I am concerned that future employers may hold my past actions against me should they look for me online as part of their screening process.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394982</id>
	<title>Can't stop the signal.</title>
	<author>kehren77</author>
	<datestamp>1260442620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no way to you to erase yourself from the web. Not unless you are Dr. Who.</p><p>And if you were never convicted of anything, and this file with your name is the only thing linking you to it online, then if someone asks about it just say it must be someone else with the same name. Weird how small the world is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no way to you to erase yourself from the web .
Not unless you are Dr. Who.And if you were never convicted of anything , and this file with your name is the only thing linking you to it online , then if someone asks about it just say it must be someone else with the same name .
Weird how small the world is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no way to you to erase yourself from the web.
Not unless you are Dr. Who.And if you were never convicted of anything, and this file with your name is the only thing linking you to it online, then if someone asks about it just say it must be someone else with the same name.
Weird how small the world is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395252</id>
	<title>Just don't lie...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260443640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All I will say is this.  Don't lie about it...  Generally employers won't go hunting down stuff like that unless you need security clearances.  If you are being interviewed to get a top secret clearance, don't lie.  Telling them "yeah, I hacked a network when I was younger" is a whole lot better than you saying you didn't and them finding out that you did.</p><p>If a future employer asks, I would tell them that you did make some youthful mistakes - I told my current employer what few I had because they were in my past... Any employer will understand that we make mistakes in school &amp; in college (hey, it's what college is for).  If an employer holds something you did in college against you, they're not someone you want to work for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All I will say is this .
Do n't lie about it... Generally employers wo n't go hunting down stuff like that unless you need security clearances .
If you are being interviewed to get a top secret clearance , do n't lie .
Telling them " yeah , I hacked a network when I was younger " is a whole lot better than you saying you did n't and them finding out that you did.If a future employer asks , I would tell them that you did make some youthful mistakes - I told my current employer what few I had because they were in my past... Any employer will understand that we make mistakes in school &amp; in college ( hey , it 's what college is for ) .
If an employer holds something you did in college against you , they 're not someone you want to work for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I will say is this.
Don't lie about it...  Generally employers won't go hunting down stuff like that unless you need security clearances.
If you are being interviewed to get a top secret clearance, don't lie.
Telling them "yeah, I hacked a network when I was younger" is a whole lot better than you saying you didn't and them finding out that you did.If a future employer asks, I would tell them that you did make some youthful mistakes - I told my current employer what few I had because they were in my past... Any employer will understand that we make mistakes in school &amp; in college (hey, it's what college is for).
If an employer holds something you did in college against you, they're not someone you want to work for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395056</id>
	<title>Step 1 Tim Lord</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260442920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dont use a slashdot profile to ask a question that has a link to your first and last name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dont use a slashdot profile to ask a question that has a link to your first and last name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dont use a slashdot profile to ask a question that has a link to your first and last name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400884</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1260542700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Photo's on facebook ? 15 years ago ? Dude, the DeLorean worked, you're back in 2009.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Photo 's on facebook ?
15 years ago ?
Dude , the DeLorean worked , you 're back in 2009 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photo's on facebook ?
15 years ago ?
Dude, the DeLorean worked, you're back in 2009.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396440</id>
	<title>It doesn't matter anymore (or soon won't)</title>
	<author>adaviel</author>
	<datestamp>1260448320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting interview on CBC radio recently with Sue Gardner, Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation. She used to work for the CBC, a fairly buttoned-down workplace. When she was asked about the culture differences, and hiring people, she noted that by the time you've seen 500 drunken party photos, you realize that you can't find any young hires that don't have some nonsense in their past. Like the recent study on the effects of porn that could not find any controls (guys who've never consumed any).
So a blameless life experience starts to look fishy - either it shows a lack of initiative or courage, or it's been doctored in some way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting interview on CBC radio recently with Sue Gardner , Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation .
She used to work for the CBC , a fairly buttoned-down workplace .
When she was asked about the culture differences , and hiring people , she noted that by the time you 've seen 500 drunken party photos , you realize that you ca n't find any young hires that do n't have some nonsense in their past .
Like the recent study on the effects of porn that could not find any controls ( guys who 've never consumed any ) .
So a blameless life experience starts to look fishy - either it shows a lack of initiative or courage , or it 's been doctored in some way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting interview on CBC radio recently with Sue Gardner, Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation.
She used to work for the CBC, a fairly buttoned-down workplace.
When she was asked about the culture differences, and hiring people, she noted that by the time you've seen 500 drunken party photos, you realize that you can't find any young hires that don't have some nonsense in their past.
Like the recent study on the effects of porn that could not find any controls (guys who've never consumed any).
So a blameless life experience starts to look fishy - either it shows a lack of initiative or courage, or it's been doctored in some way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398056</id>
	<title>It'll get better</title>
	<author>beej</author>
	<datestamp>1260461100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slowly but surely.  Kids still do stupid stuff, but now pretty much ALL of it gets on the Internet.  Instead of you being in the minority, you'll just be another person with wacky kid crap online.  You're just about 10 years too early.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slowly but surely .
Kids still do stupid stuff , but now pretty much ALL of it gets on the Internet .
Instead of you being in the minority , you 'll just be another person with wacky kid crap online .
You 're just about 10 years too early .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slowly but surely.
Kids still do stupid stuff, but now pretty much ALL of it gets on the Internet.
Instead of you being in the minority, you'll just be another person with wacky kid crap online.
You're just about 10 years too early.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397116</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>SpeedBump0619</author>
	<datestamp>1260452640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a thought experiment: if your local paper sent someone to the show to take pictures for publication would they get releases from the actors?  I'm guessing they would, which would put the performance at least in the grey area between public and private.  I'm betting (some of) those performers wouldn't have gone to the opera wearing their RHPS lingerie.</p><p>Privacy has a contextual component.  In this case the context is a performance made *to a like-minded audience*.  You can't separate the context of these pictures from the situation in which they were taken.  Publishing them openly is a change in context, and is, rightly, being seen as a breach of the performer's privacy expectations.</p><p>If it's really only for you and the cast then put it all behind a membership wall.  People inactive for too long no longer get access, but you and your cast can see anything from any time.  Maybe even allow past cast members to request access.  This has the advantage that it doesn't breach the parameters of the original context.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a thought experiment : if your local paper sent someone to the show to take pictures for publication would they get releases from the actors ?
I 'm guessing they would , which would put the performance at least in the grey area between public and private .
I 'm betting ( some of ) those performers would n't have gone to the opera wearing their RHPS lingerie.Privacy has a contextual component .
In this case the context is a performance made * to a like-minded audience * .
You ca n't separate the context of these pictures from the situation in which they were taken .
Publishing them openly is a change in context , and is , rightly , being seen as a breach of the performer 's privacy expectations.If it 's really only for you and the cast then put it all behind a membership wall .
People inactive for too long no longer get access , but you and your cast can see anything from any time .
Maybe even allow past cast members to request access .
This has the advantage that it does n't breach the parameters of the original context .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a thought experiment: if your local paper sent someone to the show to take pictures for publication would they get releases from the actors?
I'm guessing they would, which would put the performance at least in the grey area between public and private.
I'm betting (some of) those performers wouldn't have gone to the opera wearing their RHPS lingerie.Privacy has a contextual component.
In this case the context is a performance made *to a like-minded audience*.
You can't separate the context of these pictures from the situation in which they were taken.
Publishing them openly is a change in context, and is, rightly, being seen as a breach of the performer's privacy expectations.If it's really only for you and the cast then put it all behind a membership wall.
People inactive for too long no longer get access, but you and your cast can see anything from any time.
Maybe even allow past cast members to request access.
This has the advantage that it doesn't breach the parameters of the original context.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394874</id>
	<title>Chnage you name.</title>
	<author>pyster</author>
	<datestamp>1260442200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pretty much your only option is to change your name. <br> <br>
Reading the user comments on this makes me want to smoke crack...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty much your only option is to change your name .
Reading the user comments on this makes me want to smoke crack.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty much your only option is to change your name.
Reading the user comments on this makes me want to smoke crack...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30446996</id>
	<title>name change required?</title>
	<author>Dretep</author>
	<datestamp>1260902700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you're (un?)fortunate enough to share your name with other people you can just mention that it isn't you.  If there's only one of you on Google maybe try changing your name to something common like John Henry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're ( un ?
) fortunate enough to share your name with other people you can just mention that it is n't you .
If there 's only one of you on Google maybe try changing your name to something common like John Henry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're (un?
)fortunate enough to share your name with other people you can just mention that it isn't you.
If there's only one of you on Google maybe try changing your name to something common like John Henry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395014</id>
	<title>Is this an ad for the site?</title>
	<author>witch-doktor</author>
	<datestamp>1260442740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean, I'd never heard of this site before. The link to the site adds *nothing* to the story, except a lot of people (like me) will click on it and generate traffic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , I 'd never heard of this site before .
The link to the site adds * nothing * to the story , except a lot of people ( like me ) will click on it and generate traffic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, I'd never heard of this site before.
The link to the site adds *nothing* to the story, except a lot of people (like me) will click on it and generate traffic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395478</id>
	<title>Re:you bet I've had similar concerns</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1260444480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First, find somebody with the same name as you.  If you can't find such a person, make a website on a freebie host and invent them.  Put up a blog and post about trampy adventures that invariably end in failure.  Add a picture from national geographic.</p><p>Second, give up the gmail address.  If your email isn't all over the net in legit forms, get something completely different.  If you are unlucky enough to have used it in other places, get one that looks the same, but is slightly wrong.  Complain about the dick that took your name and how you have trouble yourself remembering to misspell it in your sigs.  You'll still want to transition to something different eventually.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First , find somebody with the same name as you .
If you ca n't find such a person , make a website on a freebie host and invent them .
Put up a blog and post about trampy adventures that invariably end in failure .
Add a picture from national geographic.Second , give up the gmail address .
If your email is n't all over the net in legit forms , get something completely different .
If you are unlucky enough to have used it in other places , get one that looks the same , but is slightly wrong .
Complain about the dick that took your name and how you have trouble yourself remembering to misspell it in your sigs .
You 'll still want to transition to something different eventually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, find somebody with the same name as you.
If you can't find such a person, make a website on a freebie host and invent them.
Put up a blog and post about trampy adventures that invariably end in failure.
Add a picture from national geographic.Second, give up the gmail address.
If your email isn't all over the net in legit forms, get something completely different.
If you are unlucky enough to have used it in other places, get one that looks the same, but is slightly wrong.
Complain about the dick that took your name and how you have trouble yourself remembering to misspell it in your sigs.
You'll still want to transition to something different eventually.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395180</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260443400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're pretty much a dick. From the clips I have seen of the movie, it's kind of homosexual in nature. What if those photos are hurting someone's image or reputation? What if their friends, loved ones or potential squeezes assume this person is gay now? That's awful. If you were talking any other piece, I'd say "That's not so bad"...but you are talking Rocky Horror Picture Show"....that's synonymous with freak.</p><p>Have a heart. Don't be selfish.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're pretty much a dick .
From the clips I have seen of the movie , it 's kind of homosexual in nature .
What if those photos are hurting someone 's image or reputation ?
What if their friends , loved ones or potential squeezes assume this person is gay now ?
That 's awful .
If you were talking any other piece , I 'd say " That 's not so bad " ...but you are talking Rocky Horror Picture Show " ....that 's synonymous with freak.Have a heart .
Do n't be selfish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're pretty much a dick.
From the clips I have seen of the movie, it's kind of homosexual in nature.
What if those photos are hurting someone's image or reputation?
What if their friends, loved ones or potential squeezes assume this person is gay now?
That's awful.
If you were talking any other piece, I'd say "That's not so bad"...but you are talking Rocky Horror Picture Show"....that's synonymous with freak.Have a heart.
Don't be selfish.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402842</id>
	<title>"The best response is more speech not censorship"</title>
	<author>Stephen Samuel</author>
	<datestamp>1260551880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't bother trying to censor the internet.  It's not going to happen. Your better bet is to just get a higher profile for yourself in the present.   Just be more judicious about what you release about yourself this time.   Be prolific and useful, and bury the one bad reference.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't bother trying to censor the internet .
It 's not going to happen .
Your better bet is to just get a higher profile for yourself in the present .
Just be more judicious about what you release about yourself this time .
Be prolific and useful , and bury the one bad reference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't bother trying to censor the internet.
It's not going to happen.
Your better bet is to just get a higher profile for yourself in the present.
Just be more judicious about what you release about yourself this time.
Be prolific and useful, and bury the one bad reference.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401358</id>
	<title>Re:Use it in the interview..</title>
	<author>csartanis</author>
	<datestamp>1260545100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah is that what 'youthful indiscretion' means these days?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah is that what 'youthful indiscretion ' means these days ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah is that what 'youthful indiscretion' means these days?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399568</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>cgenman</author>
	<datestamp>1260528180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the moment one of those previously partying people messes up, the HR person who hired them will take the blame.  "Why didn't you vet this person?  Didn't you realize that they 'had a history' of this sort of thing?"</p><p>Of course, I don't think it should be this way.  But the larger the organization, the harder it will be to get sanity around the org's hiring practices.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the moment one of those previously partying people messes up , the HR person who hired them will take the blame .
" Why did n't you vet this person ?
Did n't you realize that they 'had a history ' of this sort of thing ?
" Of course , I do n't think it should be this way .
But the larger the organization , the harder it will be to get sanity around the org 's hiring practices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the moment one of those previously partying people messes up, the HR person who hired them will take the blame.
"Why didn't you vet this person?
Didn't you realize that they 'had a history' of this sort of thing?
"Of course, I don't think it should be this way.
But the larger the organization, the harder it will be to get sanity around the org's hiring practices.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398210</id>
	<title>Re:And here's the payback coming to the Internet G</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1260463860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't have a solution. At least not a simple one. But it needs to understood by everyone that it IS a problem.</p> </div><p>I don't see the problem. I never understood why some people considered change to come through changing other peoples' perceptions of you. I still dress, talk, and look much as I did twenty years ago (less hair and its greying). But I have changed where it matters. An appearance is merely a uniform. You use it to expedite communication or to blend in with a particular group.<br> <br>

Now, if you've done something hideous embarrassing (like "Star Wars kid" or the "I love you" guy), then maybe you have an albatross that you can never quite get rid of. But here's my take. Recently, we had a story here about the Star Wars Holiday Special, commonly thought to be the worst two hours of TV ever. Every major actor who showed up on that, showed up on a zillion TVs and their shame has been recorded and will last as long as there are men to breathe and internets to surf. Yet when we think of the cast, we think of the movies they starred in.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't have a solution .
At least not a simple one .
But it needs to understood by everyone that it IS a problem .
I do n't see the problem .
I never understood why some people considered change to come through changing other peoples ' perceptions of you .
I still dress , talk , and look much as I did twenty years ago ( less hair and its greying ) .
But I have changed where it matters .
An appearance is merely a uniform .
You use it to expedite communication or to blend in with a particular group .
Now , if you 've done something hideous embarrassing ( like " Star Wars kid " or the " I love you " guy ) , then maybe you have an albatross that you can never quite get rid of .
But here 's my take .
Recently , we had a story here about the Star Wars Holiday Special , commonly thought to be the worst two hours of TV ever .
Every major actor who showed up on that , showed up on a zillion TVs and their shame has been recorded and will last as long as there are men to breathe and internets to surf .
Yet when we think of the cast , we think of the movies they starred in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't have a solution.
At least not a simple one.
But it needs to understood by everyone that it IS a problem.
I don't see the problem.
I never understood why some people considered change to come through changing other peoples' perceptions of you.
I still dress, talk, and look much as I did twenty years ago (less hair and its greying).
But I have changed where it matters.
An appearance is merely a uniform.
You use it to expedite communication or to blend in with a particular group.
Now, if you've done something hideous embarrassing (like "Star Wars kid" or the "I love you" guy), then maybe you have an albatross that you can never quite get rid of.
But here's my take.
Recently, we had a story here about the Star Wars Holiday Special, commonly thought to be the worst two hours of TV ever.
Every major actor who showed up on that, showed up on a zillion TVs and their shame has been recorded and will last as long as there are men to breathe and internets to surf.
Yet when we think of the cast, we think of the movies they starred in.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394482</id>
	<title>Sucks, hey?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sucks to have to live with the consequences of your actions, hey?</p><p>If it was something really serious, well, don't do the crime if you can't do the time.  If it wasn't that serious then you don't want to work for someone who would hold it against you anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sucks to have to live with the consequences of your actions , hey ? If it was something really serious , well , do n't do the crime if you ca n't do the time .
If it was n't that serious then you do n't want to work for someone who would hold it against you anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sucks to have to live with the consequences of your actions, hey?If it was something really serious, well, don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
If it wasn't that serious then you don't want to work for someone who would hold it against you anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395436</id>
	<title>Re:Live with it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260444240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A reasonable person can see the difference</p></div><p>Are you aware of the dreck that passes for HR "specialists" these days? The kind of person who doesn't see a problem with throwing out all resumes that don't include the requested "10 years of Windows Server 2003 experience" isn't "reasonable". I've encountered a number of HR-critters I'd be reluctant to apply the term "person" to as well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A reasonable person can see the differenceAre you aware of the dreck that passes for HR " specialists " these days ?
The kind of person who does n't see a problem with throwing out all resumes that do n't include the requested " 10 years of Windows Server 2003 experience " is n't " reasonable " .
I 've encountered a number of HR-critters I 'd be reluctant to apply the term " person " to as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A reasonable person can see the differenceAre you aware of the dreck that passes for HR "specialists" these days?
The kind of person who doesn't see a problem with throwing out all resumes that don't include the requested "10 years of Windows Server 2003 experience" isn't "reasonable".
I've encountered a number of HR-critters I'd be reluctant to apply the term "person" to as well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395726</id>
	<title>Get your friend to revive their e-zine...</title>
	<author>jfalcon</author>
	<datestamp>1260445380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a person who dox were also dropped on textfiles.com, I also had the same thoughts about it.  One may think of it as a badge of shame... while my relatives love using it as an extra story just to one up someone.</p><p>Personally, I don't mind it anymore.  At least I can say "I was there and here's the t-shirt".  In fact, I would do something to "update" or "refresh" your image like others have stated.</p><p>I met with Jason Scott while doing all the conferences.  His stance is very justifiable and I wouldn't ask him to change.  In fact, if you did, you'd probably get the finger as his status as an "Archivist" is pretty much bulletproof.  However, Jason is always willing to accept "new submissions".  By doing so, you can give "the rest of the story"... which is probably something alot of e-zines from back in the day lack.  All of us sorta dropped off the scene pretty quick once the world changed.  But if you got something like this hanging over you, I'd suggest spin doctoring it.</p><p>Besides, with facebook and all the other social networking sites being spidered by search engines, I doubt textfiles gets even 1/100th the traffic these sites generate.</p><p>Now if I can ever finish a new e-zine update worthy.... it was so much simpler to write back then...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a person who dox were also dropped on textfiles.com , I also had the same thoughts about it .
One may think of it as a badge of shame... while my relatives love using it as an extra story just to one up someone.Personally , I do n't mind it anymore .
At least I can say " I was there and here 's the t-shirt " .
In fact , I would do something to " update " or " refresh " your image like others have stated.I met with Jason Scott while doing all the conferences .
His stance is very justifiable and I would n't ask him to change .
In fact , if you did , you 'd probably get the finger as his status as an " Archivist " is pretty much bulletproof .
However , Jason is always willing to accept " new submissions " .
By doing so , you can give " the rest of the story " ... which is probably something alot of e-zines from back in the day lack .
All of us sorta dropped off the scene pretty quick once the world changed .
But if you got something like this hanging over you , I 'd suggest spin doctoring it.Besides , with facebook and all the other social networking sites being spidered by search engines , I doubt textfiles gets even 1/100th the traffic these sites generate.Now if I can ever finish a new e-zine update worthy.... it was so much simpler to write back then... ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a person who dox were also dropped on textfiles.com, I also had the same thoughts about it.
One may think of it as a badge of shame... while my relatives love using it as an extra story just to one up someone.Personally, I don't mind it anymore.
At least I can say "I was there and here's the t-shirt".
In fact, I would do something to "update" or "refresh" your image like others have stated.I met with Jason Scott while doing all the conferences.
His stance is very justifiable and I wouldn't ask him to change.
In fact, if you did, you'd probably get the finger as his status as an "Archivist" is pretty much bulletproof.
However, Jason is always willing to accept "new submissions".
By doing so, you can give "the rest of the story"... which is probably something alot of e-zines from back in the day lack.
All of us sorta dropped off the scene pretty quick once the world changed.
But if you got something like this hanging over you, I'd suggest spin doctoring it.Besides, with facebook and all the other social networking sites being spidered by search engines, I doubt textfiles gets even 1/100th the traffic these sites generate.Now if I can ever finish a new e-zine update worthy.... it was so much simpler to write back then... ;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395306</id>
	<title>Re:How common is your name?</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1260443880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, be careful, if you change just a letter of your name, weird things could happens,  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spell\_My\_Name\_with\_an\_S" title="wikipedia.org">you can even avoid war</a> [wikipedia.org] (or all the opposite)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , be careful , if you change just a letter of your name , weird things could happens , you can even avoid war [ wikipedia.org ] ( or all the opposite )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, be careful, if you change just a letter of your name, weird things could happens,  you can even avoid war [wikipedia.org] (or all the opposite)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394664</id>
	<title>"permanent record" - FOUND!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always wondered where that "permanent record" was that everyone warned me about.  I always assumed is was with the FBI an NSA (they know me).  Good to know they've outsource it to textfiles.com.  I'll be really worried if it were google that owned it.</p><p>Thanks for sharing your story. Perhaps a few stupid young people will think twice about doing something "funny" IRL that could follow them for life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always wondered where that " permanent record " was that everyone warned me about .
I always assumed is was with the FBI an NSA ( they know me ) .
Good to know they 've outsource it to textfiles.com .
I 'll be really worried if it were google that owned it.Thanks for sharing your story .
Perhaps a few stupid young people will think twice about doing something " funny " IRL that could follow them for life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always wondered where that "permanent record" was that everyone warned me about.
I always assumed is was with the FBI an NSA (they know me).
Good to know they've outsource it to textfiles.com.
I'll be really worried if it were google that owned it.Thanks for sharing your story.
Perhaps a few stupid young people will think twice about doing something "funny" IRL that could follow them for life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30408556</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>RapmasterT</author>
	<datestamp>1260534840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, his problem just got a LOT worse now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , his problem just got a LOT worse now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, his problem just got a LOT worse now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394648</id>
	<title>Re:Not keeping low profile?</title>
	<author>daveime</author>
	<datestamp>1260441540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aren't cease and desist takedowns usually a precursor to a libel or similar type of action.</p><p>In this case, the webmaster is not publishing anything libellous or falsehoods, simply a documented fact about something that really happenned in this person's past.</p><p>Just because you don't want it online doesn't give you any legal authority to demand it be removed. Unless of course you are the RIAA and the judge is Swedish.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't cease and desist takedowns usually a precursor to a libel or similar type of action.In this case , the webmaster is not publishing anything libellous or falsehoods , simply a documented fact about something that really happenned in this person 's past.Just because you do n't want it online does n't give you any legal authority to demand it be removed .
Unless of course you are the RIAA and the judge is Swedish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't cease and desist takedowns usually a precursor to a libel or similar type of action.In this case, the webmaster is not publishing anything libellous or falsehoods, simply a documented fact about something that really happenned in this person's past.Just because you don't want it online doesn't give you any legal authority to demand it be removed.
Unless of course you are the RIAA and the judge is Swedish.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30412658</id>
	<title>Re:you bet I've had similar concerns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260619920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get a new email address</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get a new email address</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get a new email address</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30411380</id>
	<title>Re:you bet I've had similar concerns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260556860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's times like this that I am very glad I have the same name as a highly touted pro-football player.  Everything about me is buried for better or worse, and there's more than enough ambiguity to deny anything that someone may happen to dig up on me.  Although I do get strange looks when I use a credit card sometimes.  I do not envy you, sir.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's times like this that I am very glad I have the same name as a highly touted pro-football player .
Everything about me is buried for better or worse , and there 's more than enough ambiguity to deny anything that someone may happen to dig up on me .
Although I do get strange looks when I use a credit card sometimes .
I do not envy you , sir .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's times like this that I am very glad I have the same name as a highly touted pro-football player.
Everything about me is buried for better or worse, and there's more than enough ambiguity to deny anything that someone may happen to dig up on me.
Although I do get strange looks when I use a credit card sometimes.
I do not envy you, sir.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397564</id>
	<title>Nothing you can realistically do</title>
	<author>Muad</author>
	<datestamp>1260456420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is little you can realistically do. What hits the Internet "lives forever".

If your mistake was so serious that it may affect your ability to get employment, you may want to consider changing your name.

Alternatively (and I am only half joking here), since a black (or grey) hat background is almost a pre-requisite to a career in infosec... if you are into computers and security is of interest to you, you potentially can "pull a Microsoft" (i.e. turn a weakness into a strength) and leverage your shady actions as street cred for a Computer Security career.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is little you can realistically do .
What hits the Internet " lives forever " .
If your mistake was so serious that it may affect your ability to get employment , you may want to consider changing your name .
Alternatively ( and I am only half joking here ) , since a black ( or grey ) hat background is almost a pre-requisite to a career in infosec... if you are into computers and security is of interest to you , you potentially can " pull a Microsoft " ( i.e .
turn a weakness into a strength ) and leverage your shady actions as street cred for a Computer Security career .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is little you can realistically do.
What hits the Internet "lives forever".
If your mistake was so serious that it may affect your ability to get employment, you may want to consider changing your name.
Alternatively (and I am only half joking here), since a black (or grey) hat background is almost a pre-requisite to a career in infosec... if you are into computers and security is of interest to you, you potentially can "pull a Microsoft" (i.e.
turn a weakness into a strength) and leverage your shady actions as street cred for a Computer Security career.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396130</id>
	<title>Let's see what I have to clear my name of.</title>
	<author>The Archon V2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1260446880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My name is fairly uncommon, let's see what comes up.<p>

I'm a veteran of the Second World War, I'm an avid golfer, I have three young sons, I donate to charity, I served during the Gulf War, I have two grown children, I'm five years old, and I died in 1823.</p><p>

So I'm doing pretty well, I think.</p><p>

(Conclusion: Using names as unique identifiers doesn't work. Ask any database admin.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My name is fairly uncommon , let 's see what comes up .
I 'm a veteran of the Second World War , I 'm an avid golfer , I have three young sons , I donate to charity , I served during the Gulf War , I have two grown children , I 'm five years old , and I died in 1823 .
So I 'm doing pretty well , I think .
( Conclusion : Using names as unique identifiers does n't work .
Ask any database admin .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My name is fairly uncommon, let's see what comes up.
I'm a veteran of the Second World War, I'm an avid golfer, I have three young sons, I donate to charity, I served during the Gulf War, I have two grown children, I'm five years old, and I died in 1823.
So I'm doing pretty well, I think.
(Conclusion: Using names as unique identifiers doesn't work.
Ask any database admin.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394630</id>
	<title>Re:Not keeping low profile?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>What? "Please cease and desist publishing this information about me that is true and was once published in a magazine."<p>
I think you mean 'ask politely', because I highly doubt a cease and desist would do much here beyond get you laughed at and provoke a lawyer to write a nice letter explaining the concept of the First Amendment to you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
" Please cease and desist publishing this information about me that is true and was once published in a magazine .
" I think you mean 'ask politely ' , because I highly doubt a cease and desist would do much here beyond get you laughed at and provoke a lawyer to write a nice letter explaining the concept of the First Amendment to you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
"Please cease and desist publishing this information about me that is true and was once published in a magazine.
"
I think you mean 'ask politely', because I highly doubt a cease and desist would do much here beyond get you laughed at and provoke a lawyer to write a nice letter explaining the concept of the First Amendment to you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500</id>
	<title>smokescreen</title>
	<author>resfilter</author>
	<datestamp>1260441000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>if you manage to smokescreen your online identity with huge amount of positive material that bears your name (i.e. get your name on a lot of popular projects), with lots of cross linking, you will at the very least bury it into non-existance as far as search engines are concerned.<br> <br>

if it's result number 999 on google, i doubt your average employer will read that far into it, and if they do, the amount of positive things that have been said about you will probably outweigh the one negative result<br> <br>

and i'm not sure of US law in this manner, but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned?</htmltext>
<tokenext>if you manage to smokescreen your online identity with huge amount of positive material that bears your name ( i.e .
get your name on a lot of popular projects ) , with lots of cross linking , you will at the very least bury it into non-existance as far as search engines are concerned .
if it 's result number 999 on google , i doubt your average employer will read that far into it , and if they do , the amount of positive things that have been said about you will probably outweigh the one negative result and i 'm not sure of US law in this manner , but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if you manage to smokescreen your online identity with huge amount of positive material that bears your name (i.e.
get your name on a lot of popular projects), with lots of cross linking, you will at the very least bury it into non-existance as far as search engines are concerned.
if it's result number 999 on google, i doubt your average employer will read that far into it, and if they do, the amount of positive things that have been said about you will probably outweigh the one negative result 

and i'm not sure of US law in this manner, but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398620</id>
	<title>Parent's -1 wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260469920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned?</i><br>Uhh, yes.  There is no "right" to a job in the USA.   You can be denied for <b>ANY</b> reason except race, religon, or sexual orientation and those are hard to prove.</p></div><p>Actually, that's not quite accurate.  Certain STATES (not necessarily the feds) explicitly put limits on criminal background checks.  Now, as a job seeker, you would probably not be told it was the XXX charge that you cleared of.  Usually these cases show up when someone internal blows a whistle.  But it can expose the discriminating company to lawsuits and hefty fines.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned ? Uhh , yes .
There is no " right " to a job in the USA .
You can be denied for ANY reason except race , religon , or sexual orientation and those are hard to prove.Actually , that 's not quite accurate .
Certain STATES ( not necessarily the feds ) explicitly put limits on criminal background checks .
Now , as a job seeker , you would probably not be told it was the XXX charge that you cleared of .
Usually these cases show up when someone internal blows a whistle .
But it can expose the discriminating company to lawsuits and hefty fines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned?Uhh, yes.
There is no "right" to a job in the USA.
You can be denied for ANY reason except race, religon, or sexual orientation and those are hard to prove.Actually, that's not quite accurate.
Certain STATES (not necessarily the feds) explicitly put limits on criminal background checks.
Now, as a job seeker, you would probably not be told it was the XXX charge that you cleared of.
Usually these cases show up when someone internal blows a whistle.
But it can expose the discriminating company to lawsuits and hefty fines.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397522</id>
	<title>Re:DNS information?</title>
	<author>zill</author>
	<datestamp>1260456060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Think of it this way: if a potential employer googles your name and finds the results offensive, do you really want to work there? <br> <br>

We're talking about a workplace where the management and/or HR goes behind each worker's back and snoops around their private lives. And then they change their <b>professional</b> opinion of you based on whatever <b>personal</b> information they found<br> <br>

The casual watercooler chats? Detrimental to your career.<br> <br>

Your political afflictions? Determines whether you get a raise of not. <br> <br>

I wouldn't work in a place like that even if they invited me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of it this way : if a potential employer googles your name and finds the results offensive , do you really want to work there ?
We 're talking about a workplace where the management and/or HR goes behind each worker 's back and snoops around their private lives .
And then they change their professional opinion of you based on whatever personal information they found The casual watercooler chats ?
Detrimental to your career .
Your political afflictions ?
Determines whether you get a raise of not .
I would n't work in a place like that even if they invited me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of it this way: if a potential employer googles your name and finds the results offensive, do you really want to work there?
We're talking about a workplace where the management and/or HR goes behind each worker's back and snoops around their private lives.
And then they change their professional opinion of you based on whatever personal information they found 

The casual watercooler chats?
Detrimental to your career.
Your political afflictions?
Determines whether you get a raise of not.
I wouldn't work in a place like that even if they invited me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395438</id>
	<title>Re:smokescreen</title>
	<author>wowbagger</author>
	<datestamp>1260444300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned?"</p><p>The problem isn't denying the person the job - as in "No, we won't hire you because you once tied the Dean's underwear to the flagpole" - the problem is your CV never making it past the first level HR drone in the first place. In many cases, they reject hundreds of applicants, for a myriad of reasons from poor spelling to ripped paper to "that guy has the same first name as my recent ex", turning over only the top 10\% to the people who will be doing the real interviewing.</p><p>So, you won't have any idea you were rejected because of that unfortunate flag-pole incident - just that you never heard back from the company.</p><p>And you'll never be the wiser, unless you have a very rare job skill - one that means you won't have much competition for the job. And in that case, that "flag-pole" incident won't matter, so long as you follow one simple rule:</p><p>When asked about it, DON'T LIE. Be honest: "I was young and stupid, and have regretted that mistake ever since. I've learned not to do dumb things like that, and it has made me more cautious about considering my actions before acting."</p><p>You lie, and they find out about it (and let's face it, if they've asked you about it, they already have found out), and you are out on your ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned ?
" The problem is n't denying the person the job - as in " No , we wo n't hire you because you once tied the Dean 's underwear to the flagpole " - the problem is your CV never making it past the first level HR drone in the first place .
In many cases , they reject hundreds of applicants , for a myriad of reasons from poor spelling to ripped paper to " that guy has the same first name as my recent ex " , turning over only the top 10 \ % to the people who will be doing the real interviewing.So , you wo n't have any idea you were rejected because of that unfortunate flag-pole incident - just that you never heard back from the company.And you 'll never be the wiser , unless you have a very rare job skill - one that means you wo n't have much competition for the job .
And in that case , that " flag-pole " incident wo n't matter , so long as you follow one simple rule : When asked about it , DO N'T LIE .
Be honest : " I was young and stupid , and have regretted that mistake ever since .
I 've learned not to do dumb things like that , and it has made me more cautious about considering my actions before acting .
" You lie , and they find out about it ( and let 's face it , if they 've asked you about it , they already have found out ) , and you are out on your ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned?
"The problem isn't denying the person the job - as in "No, we won't hire you because you once tied the Dean's underwear to the flagpole" - the problem is your CV never making it past the first level HR drone in the first place.
In many cases, they reject hundreds of applicants, for a myriad of reasons from poor spelling to ripped paper to "that guy has the same first name as my recent ex", turning over only the top 10\% to the people who will be doing the real interviewing.So, you won't have any idea you were rejected because of that unfortunate flag-pole incident - just that you never heard back from the company.And you'll never be the wiser, unless you have a very rare job skill - one that means you won't have much competition for the job.
And in that case, that "flag-pole" incident won't matter, so long as you follow one simple rule:When asked about it, DON'T LIE.
Be honest: "I was young and stupid, and have regretted that mistake ever since.
I've learned not to do dumb things like that, and it has made me more cautious about considering my actions before acting.
"You lie, and they find out about it (and let's face it, if they've asked you about it, they already have found out), and you are out on your ass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394698</id>
	<title>Re:Not keeping low profile?</title>
	<author>larry bagina</author>
	<datestamp>1260441720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm a big fan of textfiles and would hate to see shit taken down. (Aside from J Random Douchebag's name, they have anarchy files with bomb instructions, etc.  You shouldn't try them, but it has historical and comical value and censoring won't stop terrorism).  I don't know or care what the incident was, but chances are I would think "that's cool" rather than "don't hire" given the context.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a big fan of textfiles and would hate to see shit taken down .
( Aside from J Random Douchebag 's name , they have anarchy files with bomb instructions , etc .
You should n't try them , but it has historical and comical value and censoring wo n't stop terrorism ) .
I do n't know or care what the incident was , but chances are I would think " that 's cool " rather than " do n't hire " given the context .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a big fan of textfiles and would hate to see shit taken down.
(Aside from J Random Douchebag's name, they have anarchy files with bomb instructions, etc.
You shouldn't try them, but it has historical and comical value and censoring won't stop terrorism).
I don't know or care what the incident was, but chances are I would think "that's cool" rather than "don't hire" given the context.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397950</id>
	<title>options</title>
	<author>countach</author>
	<datestamp>1260459660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think your main two options are to hit everyone up with heavy duty lawyers, or else bombard Google with so much other information about yourself, that this drops down to page #100. Maybe a third option is to fabricate an identity of someone else with the same name as you, and pretend you were a different person.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think your main two options are to hit everyone up with heavy duty lawyers , or else bombard Google with so much other information about yourself , that this drops down to page # 100 .
Maybe a third option is to fabricate an identity of someone else with the same name as you , and pretend you were a different person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think your main two options are to hit everyone up with heavy duty lawyers, or else bombard Google with so much other information about yourself, that this drops down to page #100.
Maybe a third option is to fabricate an identity of someone else with the same name as you, and pretend you were a different person.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396896</id>
	<title>Re:you bet I've had similar concerns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260450960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had something similar to me happen.  Only I was getting married within two days, and the person who used my email account sent a story about how I became gay and was moving to Guam with Rico, my Latin lover.  My current wife and family got this email message and thought the wedding was off.  I had to call everyone on the guest list and explain.  To this day, ten years later, somebody asks about how my Latin lover is doing?  That was the absolute last time I logged into an email account from a public computer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had something similar to me happen .
Only I was getting married within two days , and the person who used my email account sent a story about how I became gay and was moving to Guam with Rico , my Latin lover .
My current wife and family got this email message and thought the wedding was off .
I had to call everyone on the guest list and explain .
To this day , ten years later , somebody asks about how my Latin lover is doing ?
That was the absolute last time I logged into an email account from a public computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had something similar to me happen.
Only I was getting married within two days, and the person who used my email account sent a story about how I became gay and was moving to Guam with Rico, my Latin lover.
My current wife and family got this email message and thought the wedding was off.
I had to call everyone on the guest list and explain.
To this day, ten years later, somebody asks about how my Latin lover is doing?
That was the absolute last time I logged into an email account from a public computer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30407336</id>
	<title>Re:Depends</title>
	<author>StrategicIrony</author>
	<datestamp>1260527940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!</p><p>Straw man, anyone?</p><p>Did you ever steal a pack of bubblegum from the store when you were 12?  Cos surveys say that almost 50\% of society has engaged in some petty theft in the past.</p><p>Normally, background checks and job applications only go back 5-7 years for misdemeanors (which most crimes are).  This is for a reason, not just because we're all lazy fuckers who don't want to shuffle paper.</p><p>Raping and murdering is entirely different.   But way to take the outlier and try to use it as anecdote.  I'm sure Glen Beck would be proud.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! !
! Straw man , anyone ? Did you ever steal a pack of bubblegum from the store when you were 12 ?
Cos surveys say that almost 50 \ % of society has engaged in some petty theft in the past.Normally , background checks and job applications only go back 5-7 years for misdemeanors ( which most crimes are ) .
This is for a reason , not just because we 're all lazy fuckers who do n't want to shuffle paper.Raping and murdering is entirely different .
But way to take the outlier and try to use it as anecdote .
I 'm sure Glen Beck would be proud .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
!Straw man, anyone?Did you ever steal a pack of bubblegum from the store when you were 12?
Cos surveys say that almost 50\% of society has engaged in some petty theft in the past.Normally, background checks and job applications only go back 5-7 years for misdemeanors (which most crimes are).
This is for a reason, not just because we're all lazy fuckers who don't want to shuffle paper.Raping and murdering is entirely different.
But way to take the outlier and try to use it as anecdote.
I'm sure Glen Beck would be proud.
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397606</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260456840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...conscious of their public image...</p></div><p>Nobody should be conscious of their public image. Be yourself, good and bad, all as one. Fuck the consequences because if you don't, you give up your chance at being uniquely you. It doesn't matter what "society" thinks, nor does it matter what the "norms" are. Society and its norms are constructs of its people, and we are all the people, so we make the future norms (lets make them reasonable at least!). A population conforming to norms has a negative impact on the advancement of society because that society will stagnate. A job is not worth your identity, nor is it worth much at all. Money will never bring you happiness.</p><p>Obligatory xkcd reference: <a href="http://xkcd.com/137/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/137</a> [xkcd.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...conscious of their public image...Nobody should be conscious of their public image .
Be yourself , good and bad , all as one .
Fuck the consequences because if you do n't , you give up your chance at being uniquely you .
It does n't matter what " society " thinks , nor does it matter what the " norms " are .
Society and its norms are constructs of its people , and we are all the people , so we make the future norms ( lets make them reasonable at least ! ) .
A population conforming to norms has a negative impact on the advancement of society because that society will stagnate .
A job is not worth your identity , nor is it worth much at all .
Money will never bring you happiness.Obligatory xkcd reference : http : //xkcd.com/137 [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...conscious of their public image...Nobody should be conscious of their public image.
Be yourself, good and bad, all as one.
Fuck the consequences because if you don't, you give up your chance at being uniquely you.
It doesn't matter what "society" thinks, nor does it matter what the "norms" are.
Society and its norms are constructs of its people, and we are all the people, so we make the future norms (lets make them reasonable at least!).
A population conforming to norms has a negative impact on the advancement of society because that society will stagnate.
A job is not worth your identity, nor is it worth much at all.
Money will never bring you happiness.Obligatory xkcd reference: http://xkcd.com/137 [xkcd.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399844</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260532620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig.  Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.</p></div><p>Tell it to Google. "Don't be evil". Hahahahahahahahaha!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>IMHO just as thre 's a 7-year stature of limitations on law , so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig .
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.Tell it to Google .
" Do n't be evil " .
Hahahahahahahahaha !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig.
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.Tell it to Google.
"Don't be evil".
Hahahahahahahahaha!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396672</id>
	<title>Re:Use it in the interview..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260449640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>amen my pay phone hijacking brethren. I shudder to think what the outcome of my two fbi run-ins would have been had either occured in the last few years instead of 2 decades ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>amen my pay phone hijacking brethren .
I shudder to think what the outcome of my two fbi run-ins would have been had either occured in the last few years instead of 2 decades ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>amen my pay phone hijacking brethren.
I shudder to think what the outcome of my two fbi run-ins would have been had either occured in the last few years instead of 2 decades ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926</id>
	<title>Re:How common is your name?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260442380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; There's a bit more to it.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Of course, deny, deny, deny is a wonderful thing.  He has other options though.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; 1) He could bury it so deep in the searches that no one would ever stumble upon it.  He could plaster his name across so many sites that he seems like a good upstanding citizen (and search engine spammer).</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; 2) He could build a disinformation campaign.  Build up identities with the same name but obviously different information.  We'll assume his name is so unique there's only him to find.  Now, with 100 profiles on sites and message boards with different ages, locations, and experiences (although all bogus) they'd have to wade through the crap to identify him.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; 3) Deny, deny, deny.  It's still a good option.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  If a prospective employer comes across it, laugh about it.  "Ya, I found my name, and saw what that other guy did.  It's funny, but no it's not me."</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; 4) Admit to the felony electronic trespass against the university that he was at, and not get the job.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  Ok, I'm just making an assumption on that one, but at some point, especially if there were federal charges, someone's going to track it back to him.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    There 's a bit more to it .
    Of course , deny , deny , deny is a wonderful thing .
He has other options though .
    1 ) He could bury it so deep in the searches that no one would ever stumble upon it .
He could plaster his name across so many sites that he seems like a good upstanding citizen ( and search engine spammer ) .
    2 ) He could build a disinformation campaign .
Build up identities with the same name but obviously different information .
We 'll assume his name is so unique there 's only him to find .
Now , with 100 profiles on sites and message boards with different ages , locations , and experiences ( although all bogus ) they 'd have to wade through the crap to identify him .
    3 ) Deny , deny , deny .
It 's still a good option .
: ) If a prospective employer comes across it , laugh about it .
" Ya , I found my name , and saw what that other guy did .
It 's funny , but no it 's not me .
"     4 ) Admit to the felony electronic trespass against the university that he was at , and not get the job .
: ) Ok , I 'm just making an assumption on that one , but at some point , especially if there were federal charges , someone 's going to track it back to him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    There's a bit more to it.
    Of course, deny, deny, deny is a wonderful thing.
He has other options though.
    1) He could bury it so deep in the searches that no one would ever stumble upon it.
He could plaster his name across so many sites that he seems like a good upstanding citizen (and search engine spammer).
    2) He could build a disinformation campaign.
Build up identities with the same name but obviously different information.
We'll assume his name is so unique there's only him to find.
Now, with 100 profiles on sites and message boards with different ages, locations, and experiences (although all bogus) they'd have to wade through the crap to identify him.
    3) Deny, deny, deny.
It's still a good option.
:)  If a prospective employer comes across it, laugh about it.
"Ya, I found my name, and saw what that other guy did.
It's funny, but no it's not me.
"
    4) Admit to the felony electronic trespass against the university that he was at, and not get the job.
:)  Ok, I'm just making an assumption on that one, but at some point, especially if there were federal charges, someone's going to track it back to him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397270</id>
	<title>I hear ya...</title>
	<author>VennData</author>
	<datestamp>1260453960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah... well... so like I've been sort of... hanging out a lot after work, you know, and like... well I've sort of hooked up with some lush trim and like, my wife finds out and she like, tries to take a golf club to my head and so like I crashed my SUV, sort of.  Anyway, I think it's like getting out and I was wondering if you had any suggestions for the on-line portion.  i can handle the other stuff, I'm just worried about the on-line stuff YouTubes and stuff.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah... well... so like I 've been sort of... hanging out a lot after work , you know , and like... well I 've sort of hooked up with some lush trim and like , my wife finds out and she like , tries to take a golf club to my head and so like I crashed my SUV , sort of .
Anyway , I think it 's like getting out and I was wondering if you had any suggestions for the on-line portion .
i can handle the other stuff , I 'm just worried about the on-line stuff YouTubes and stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah... well... so like I've been sort of... hanging out a lot after work, you know, and like... well I've sort of hooked up with some lush trim and like, my wife finds out and she like, tries to take a golf club to my head and so like I crashed my SUV, sort of.
Anyway, I think it's like getting out and I was wondering if you had any suggestions for the on-line portion.
i can handle the other stuff, I'm just worried about the on-line stuff YouTubes and stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396172</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Kjella</author>
	<datestamp>1260447060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig. Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant</p></div><p>Your posts suggests a<br>(x) legal<br>( ) social<br>( ) technical<br>( ) vigilante<br>solution to the problem. This won't work because...</p><p>(x) You expect employers to give a reason for not hiring you<br>(x) You expect employers to be honest about the reason for not hiring you<br>(x) You think it possible to somehow split up life in two parts<br>(x) There's no way to know what information they looked at<br>(x) They wouldn't reveal the other candidates and their experience to you</p><p>There's not a job in the world where you can't get dismissed with "Well, you were a very good candidate but didn't quite make it to the head of the line." and if pushed "You didn't seem [vague personality trait like enthusiastic, interested, confident] enough for the position." You weren't there in the other interviews, maybe they really did have a better candidate. It's extremely hard to prove a negative, maybe you can fish out a race/gender bias with enough hires but trying to prove why exactly you weren't hired is near impossible. If you tried to push the issue legally, what would you think if you were on the jury? That this is some paranoid delusional who sues because he's managed to conjure up this great conspiracy theory that information about him online cost him the job, or that simply he wasn't their choice? It happens to x-1 of the x people applying for any job, you know.</p><p>No, the only real solution here is cultural change and you can see an self-feeding trend that people are willing to talk about more when other people do too. It sure could bite people in the ass but it could also lead to hiring managers realizing this isn't a particularly bad or abnormal person, When Big Brother started it was like "OMG they're getitng drunk and having sex on TV", these days they have to gangbang the whole set to catch some headlines. Ultimately it's not like getting drunk and having sex makes you a very unusual person, except the cameras. And the numbers of celebs and sports idols and animal activists and housewifes and whatnot showing up nude ultimately together signalize "no big deal". I'm sure there'll still be asshats but if there's few enough you can simply pass on those who don't approve of your life style.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>IMHO just as thre 's a 7-year stature of limitations on law , so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig .
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevantYour posts suggests a ( x ) legal ( ) social ( ) technical ( ) vigilantesolution to the problem .
This wo n't work because... ( x ) You expect employers to give a reason for not hiring you ( x ) You expect employers to be honest about the reason for not hiring you ( x ) You think it possible to somehow split up life in two parts ( x ) There 's no way to know what information they looked at ( x ) They would n't reveal the other candidates and their experience to youThere 's not a job in the world where you ca n't get dismissed with " Well , you were a very good candidate but did n't quite make it to the head of the line .
" and if pushed " You did n't seem [ vague personality trait like enthusiastic , interested , confident ] enough for the position .
" You were n't there in the other interviews , maybe they really did have a better candidate .
It 's extremely hard to prove a negative , maybe you can fish out a race/gender bias with enough hires but trying to prove why exactly you were n't hired is near impossible .
If you tried to push the issue legally , what would you think if you were on the jury ?
That this is some paranoid delusional who sues because he 's managed to conjure up this great conspiracy theory that information about him online cost him the job , or that simply he was n't their choice ?
It happens to x-1 of the x people applying for any job , you know.No , the only real solution here is cultural change and you can see an self-feeding trend that people are willing to talk about more when other people do too .
It sure could bite people in the ass but it could also lead to hiring managers realizing this is n't a particularly bad or abnormal person , When Big Brother started it was like " OMG they 're getitng drunk and having sex on TV " , these days they have to gangbang the whole set to catch some headlines .
Ultimately it 's not like getting drunk and having sex makes you a very unusual person , except the cameras .
And the numbers of celebs and sports idols and animal activists and housewifes and whatnot showing up nude ultimately together signalize " no big deal " .
I 'm sure there 'll still be asshats but if there 's few enough you can simply pass on those who do n't approve of your life style .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig.
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevantYour posts suggests a(x) legal( ) social( ) technical( ) vigilantesolution to the problem.
This won't work because...(x) You expect employers to give a reason for not hiring you(x) You expect employers to be honest about the reason for not hiring you(x) You think it possible to somehow split up life in two parts(x) There's no way to know what information they looked at(x) They wouldn't reveal the other candidates and their experience to youThere's not a job in the world where you can't get dismissed with "Well, you were a very good candidate but didn't quite make it to the head of the line.
" and if pushed "You didn't seem [vague personality trait like enthusiastic, interested, confident] enough for the position.
" You weren't there in the other interviews, maybe they really did have a better candidate.
It's extremely hard to prove a negative, maybe you can fish out a race/gender bias with enough hires but trying to prove why exactly you weren't hired is near impossible.
If you tried to push the issue legally, what would you think if you were on the jury?
That this is some paranoid delusional who sues because he's managed to conjure up this great conspiracy theory that information about him online cost him the job, or that simply he wasn't their choice?
It happens to x-1 of the x people applying for any job, you know.No, the only real solution here is cultural change and you can see an self-feeding trend that people are willing to talk about more when other people do too.
It sure could bite people in the ass but it could also lead to hiring managers realizing this isn't a particularly bad or abnormal person, When Big Brother started it was like "OMG they're getitng drunk and having sex on TV", these days they have to gangbang the whole set to catch some headlines.
Ultimately it's not like getting drunk and having sex makes you a very unusual person, except the cameras.
And the numbers of celebs and sports idols and animal activists and housewifes and whatnot showing up nude ultimately together signalize "no big deal".
I'm sure there'll still be asshats but if there's few enough you can simply pass on those who don't approve of your life style.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397868</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260459120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See, this is why glue sniffing 12 year olds shouldn't be allowed to mod anything insightful.  Jesse, if your a manager somewhere who is using someones 12 year old teenage indiscretions as a reason why you won't hire them now then your costing your company money.  If you were saying that a persons history and actions last year, with their last employer or even 5 years ago at work were pertinent, then I would agree with you.  But you don't seem to be saying that, instead you seem to be saying that if someone got drunk and photo tagged in college 15 years ago then you should hold that against them.  Simply put, your full of sh**.</p><p>Even in the case of someone who had a major cock up at work 10 years ago, I disagree with you, (except that here, because it was work related I do agree it should be considered).  In this case, I fundamentally disagree that such a person represents a 'greater risk'.  The best project managers, team leaders, engineers, programmers, and even small business CEO's that I have encountered all got that good by making a lot of mistakes on their way there.  Some of those mistakes were technical, some social, and some had significant commercial impacts on their companies at the time, but the ones who learned from those mistakes are better employees for it.</p><p>Do I think history is important?  Yes.  Do I think history of what a person did 10+ years ago counts for anything?  Not at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See , this is why glue sniffing 12 year olds should n't be allowed to mod anything insightful .
Jesse , if your a manager somewhere who is using someones 12 year old teenage indiscretions as a reason why you wo n't hire them now then your costing your company money .
If you were saying that a persons history and actions last year , with their last employer or even 5 years ago at work were pertinent , then I would agree with you .
But you do n't seem to be saying that , instead you seem to be saying that if someone got drunk and photo tagged in college 15 years ago then you should hold that against them .
Simply put , your full of sh * * .Even in the case of someone who had a major cock up at work 10 years ago , I disagree with you , ( except that here , because it was work related I do agree it should be considered ) .
In this case , I fundamentally disagree that such a person represents a 'greater risk' .
The best project managers , team leaders , engineers , programmers , and even small business CEO 's that I have encountered all got that good by making a lot of mistakes on their way there .
Some of those mistakes were technical , some social , and some had significant commercial impacts on their companies at the time , but the ones who learned from those mistakes are better employees for it.Do I think history is important ?
Yes. Do I think history of what a person did 10 + years ago counts for anything ?
Not at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See, this is why glue sniffing 12 year olds shouldn't be allowed to mod anything insightful.
Jesse, if your a manager somewhere who is using someones 12 year old teenage indiscretions as a reason why you won't hire them now then your costing your company money.
If you were saying that a persons history and actions last year, with their last employer or even 5 years ago at work were pertinent, then I would agree with you.
But you don't seem to be saying that, instead you seem to be saying that if someone got drunk and photo tagged in college 15 years ago then you should hold that against them.
Simply put, your full of sh**.Even in the case of someone who had a major cock up at work 10 years ago, I disagree with you, (except that here, because it was work related I do agree it should be considered).
In this case, I fundamentally disagree that such a person represents a 'greater risk'.
The best project managers, team leaders, engineers, programmers, and even small business CEO's that I have encountered all got that good by making a lot of mistakes on their way there.
Some of those mistakes were technical, some social, and some had significant commercial impacts on their companies at the time, but the ones who learned from those mistakes are better employees for it.Do I think history is important?
Yes.  Do I think history of what a person did 10+ years ago counts for anything?
Not at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395684</id>
	<title>Dude, chill!</title>
	<author>yet-another-lobbyist</author>
	<datestamp>1260445200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I found your name in five seconds. Was not so difficult using the information you provided. There are already zillions of other stories about you out there. This stuff is so deeply buried, who would even care? No charges, no criminal record. Being so all scared about it won't give you many credits for courage...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I found your name in five seconds .
Was not so difficult using the information you provided .
There are already zillions of other stories about you out there .
This stuff is so deeply buried , who would even care ?
No charges , no criminal record .
Being so all scared about it wo n't give you many credits for courage.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I found your name in five seconds.
Was not so difficult using the information you provided.
There are already zillions of other stories about you out there.
This stuff is so deeply buried, who would even care?
No charges, no criminal record.
Being so all scared about it won't give you many credits for courage...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397936</id>
	<title>How Ironic</title>
	<author>gillbates</author>
	<datestamp>1260459600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
One of my concerns about raising children in a small town is if it will prepare them for the "real" world outside the city limits.
</p><p>
Oddly, I think it does.  In a small town, one learns very quickly that the whole town soon learns of whatever you say or do.  There is no real anonymity.  And growing up, you learn quickly not to make public anything you don't want your "whole world" to know.
</p><p>
Yet I hear time and again the sentiment that people think they're anonymous on the net.  How ironic that someone who presumably understood enough about computers to use them for nefarious deeds did not think of the longer term consequences of their actions
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of my concerns about raising children in a small town is if it will prepare them for the " real " world outside the city limits .
Oddly , I think it does .
In a small town , one learns very quickly that the whole town soon learns of whatever you say or do .
There is no real anonymity .
And growing up , you learn quickly not to make public anything you do n't want your " whole world " to know .
Yet I hear time and again the sentiment that people think they 're anonymous on the net .
How ironic that someone who presumably understood enough about computers to use them for nefarious deeds did not think of the longer term consequences of their actions</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
One of my concerns about raising children in a small town is if it will prepare them for the "real" world outside the city limits.
Oddly, I think it does.
In a small town, one learns very quickly that the whole town soon learns of whatever you say or do.
There is no real anonymity.
And growing up, you learn quickly not to make public anything you don't want your "whole world" to know.
Yet I hear time and again the sentiment that people think they're anonymous on the net.
How ironic that someone who presumably understood enough about computers to use them for nefarious deeds did not think of the longer term consequences of their actions
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395778</id>
	<title>You just did it again...</title>
	<author>icepick72</author>
	<datestamp>1260445500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even if you argue it was only intended for a small readership, what if those in the small readership are your potential employers? What to do now? Try not to spread it, duplicate or propagate further, but you just made that mistake by posting to Slashdot. So this latest incarnation of the info will be indexed by Google along with all comments, research on you and speculation about it. So you did it again...</p><p>At this point I like the suggestion somebody else posted about putting a lot of info about yourself online (good stuff) to dilute the perceived bad info.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if you argue it was only intended for a small readership , what if those in the small readership are your potential employers ?
What to do now ?
Try not to spread it , duplicate or propagate further , but you just made that mistake by posting to Slashdot .
So this latest incarnation of the info will be indexed by Google along with all comments , research on you and speculation about it .
So you did it again...At this point I like the suggestion somebody else posted about putting a lot of info about yourself online ( good stuff ) to dilute the perceived bad info .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if you argue it was only intended for a small readership, what if those in the small readership are your potential employers?
What to do now?
Try not to spread it, duplicate or propagate further, but you just made that mistake by posting to Slashdot.
So this latest incarnation of the info will be indexed by Google along with all comments, research on you and speculation about it.
So you did it again...At this point I like the suggestion somebody else posted about putting a lot of info about yourself online (good stuff) to dilute the perceived bad info.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395750</id>
	<title>Streisand effect</title>
	<author>Jessified</author>
	<datestamp>1260445440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Posting to slashdot can't be helping the situation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Posting to slashdot ca n't be helping the situation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Posting to slashdot can't be helping the situation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398296</id>
	<title>Bury yourself.</title>
	<author>ClickWir</author>
	<datestamp>1260465060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bury yourself with other content. If you cannot remove something, make other content more prominent and easier to find.</p><p>If 10 people say X about you, get 100 people to say Y about you. When someone goes looking, they are far more likely to hear Y.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bury yourself with other content .
If you can not remove something , make other content more prominent and easier to find.If 10 people say X about you , get 100 people to say Y about you .
When someone goes looking , they are far more likely to hear Y .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bury yourself with other content.
If you cannot remove something, make other content more prominent and easier to find.If 10 people say X about you, get 100 people to say Y about you.
When someone goes looking, they are far more likely to hear Y.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396490</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>mr\_eigenvector</author>
	<datestamp>1260448620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think Jesse is doing something similar to Evan Ratliff of Wired. He's probably doing some research for a book or presentation based on web identities.<br> <br>

Just look at all the talks he gives about the internet on this youtube channel:<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7taUhf\_ROU" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7taUhf\_ROU</a> [youtube.com]
<br> <br>
He also have a very large web presence and searches I would do of him didn't yield anything about his break in of the university's computer.<br> <br>

It was only with "textfiles.com" information was I able to find anything.<br> <br>

For me, it is highly suspicious that he would give up this critical piece of information, but given the nature of his work, it seemed like he really wanted to see if people could find out who he was.<br> <br>

He's also a regular commentator on CBC as a technology analyst:<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search\_query=Jesse+Hirsh+CBC" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search\_query=Jesse+Hirsh+CBC</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Jesse is doing something similar to Evan Ratliff of Wired .
He 's probably doing some research for a book or presentation based on web identities .
Just look at all the talks he gives about the internet on this youtube channel : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = e7taUhf \ _ROU [ youtube.com ] He also have a very large web presence and searches I would do of him did n't yield anything about his break in of the university 's computer .
It was only with " textfiles.com " information was I able to find anything .
For me , it is highly suspicious that he would give up this critical piece of information , but given the nature of his work , it seemed like he really wanted to see if people could find out who he was .
He 's also a regular commentator on CBC as a technology analyst : http : //www.youtube.com/results ? search \ _query = Jesse + Hirsh + CBC [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Jesse is doing something similar to Evan Ratliff of Wired.
He's probably doing some research for a book or presentation based on web identities.
Just look at all the talks he gives about the internet on this youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7taUhf\_ROU [youtube.com]
 
He also have a very large web presence and searches I would do of him didn't yield anything about his break in of the university's computer.
It was only with "textfiles.com" information was I able to find anything.
For me, it is highly suspicious that he would give up this critical piece of information, but given the nature of his work, it seemed like he really wanted to see if people could find out who he was.
He's also a regular commentator on CBC as a technology analyst:
http://www.youtube.com/results?search\_query=Jesse+Hirsh+CBC [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395356</id>
	<title>Re:The best thing you can do is post on /.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260444000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And that&rsquo;s not all. In five minutes he will have had a rape party with a dozen monkeys while wearing a Borat style &ldquo;swimsuit&rdquo;, stilettos and a huge assblaster in 2004. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And that    s not all .
In five minutes he will have had a rape party with a dozen monkeys while wearing a Borat style    swimsuit    , stilettos and a huge assblaster in 2004 .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And that’s not all.
In five minutes he will have had a rape party with a dozen monkeys while wearing a Borat style “swimsuit”, stilettos and a huge assblaster in 2004.
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396434</id>
	<title>Low Profile</title>
	<author>tthomas48</author>
	<datestamp>1260448320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This might be your problem:</p><p>"I've generally tried to keep a low profile online"</p><p>Step up your online presence. Be helpful on message boards. Have a twitter and facebook account. Generally have an online persona so that the only thing people find in a search isn't a reference to you and crime. If your only online presence is negative that's bad. If there's lots of positive and noise it's probably not that bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This might be your problem : " I 've generally tried to keep a low profile online " Step up your online presence .
Be helpful on message boards .
Have a twitter and facebook account .
Generally have an online persona so that the only thing people find in a search is n't a reference to you and crime .
If your only online presence is negative that 's bad .
If there 's lots of positive and noise it 's probably not that bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This might be your problem:"I've generally tried to keep a low profile online"Step up your online presence.
Be helpful on message boards.
Have a twitter and facebook account.
Generally have an online persona so that the only thing people find in a search isn't a reference to you and crime.
If your only online presence is negative that's bad.
If there's lots of positive and noise it's probably not that bad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397368</id>
	<title>Re:And here's the payback coming to the Internet G</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1260454740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm pretty much the only Erik Trimble on the Internet</p></div><p>The solutions people proposed above seem relevant to you: Get a few stock images of dudes, then go make Myspace accounts with them, each one taking blame for an embarrassing part of your life. Also make sure to name your kid Mohammed, its the most common name.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty much the only Erik Trimble on the InternetThe solutions people proposed above seem relevant to you : Get a few stock images of dudes , then go make Myspace accounts with them , each one taking blame for an embarrassing part of your life .
Also make sure to name your kid Mohammed , its the most common name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty much the only Erik Trimble on the InternetThe solutions people proposed above seem relevant to you: Get a few stock images of dudes, then go make Myspace accounts with them, each one taking blame for an embarrassing part of your life.
Also make sure to name your kid Mohammed, its the most common name.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396956</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260451500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Next time you need/want to post something on the internet, use an unsecured public network, or a proxy server.  NEVER post to a site that requires that you register.  NEVER use your real name and information.  If information really stays on the internet forever, then I would be screwed.  When I google my name, none of the nefarious things in my background show up.  Not even the glug glug vroom vroom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next time you need/want to post something on the internet , use an unsecured public network , or a proxy server .
NEVER post to a site that requires that you register .
NEVER use your real name and information .
If information really stays on the internet forever , then I would be screwed .
When I google my name , none of the nefarious things in my background show up .
Not even the glug glug vroom vroom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next time you need/want to post something on the internet, use an unsecured public network, or a proxy server.
NEVER post to a site that requires that you register.
NEVER use your real name and information.
If information really stays on the internet forever, then I would be screwed.
When I google my name, none of the nefarious things in my background show up.
Not even the glug glug vroom vroom.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395174</id>
	<title>Re:On reflection...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260443400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This would've been funnier if either</p><p>1.  The submission was not anonymous.<br>2.  It linked to the actual zine article.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would 've been funnier if either1 .
The submission was not anonymous.2 .
It linked to the actual zine article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would've been funnier if either1.
The submission was not anonymous.2.
It linked to the actual zine article.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395118</id>
	<title>Re:Not keeping low profile?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260443160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed!  Bury it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed !
Bury it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed!
Bury it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394476</id>
	<title>On reflection...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260440880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>...posting the fact to a site where a good deal of the readership's instinctive reaction to the posting of sensitive information on the Internet is to find and mirror it in as many locations as possible is probably not the best first step.  See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand\_effect" title="wikipedia.org">"Streisand Effect".</a> [wikipedia.org]  Then again, if you are just pretending to be the subject of the text in order to humiliate the actual victim even further, then I tip my hat to you sir.  Bravo!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...posting the fact to a site where a good deal of the readership 's instinctive reaction to the posting of sensitive information on the Internet is to find and mirror it in as many locations as possible is probably not the best first step .
See " Streisand Effect " .
[ wikipedia.org ] Then again , if you are just pretending to be the subject of the text in order to humiliate the actual victim even further , then I tip my hat to you sir .
Bravo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...posting the fact to a site where a good deal of the readership's instinctive reaction to the posting of sensitive information on the Internet is to find and mirror it in as many locations as possible is probably not the best first step.
See "Streisand Effect".
[wikipedia.org]  Then again, if you are just pretending to be the subject of the text in order to humiliate the actual victim even further, then I tip my hat to you sir.
Bravo!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398978</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>michaelhood</author>
	<datestamp>1260562980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Or bury it.  Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you will only find the good stuff and hopefully will get bored before they find that one blemish.</p></div><p>This seems to be working.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or bury it .
Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you will only find the good stuff and hopefully will get bored before they find that one blemish.This seems to be working .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or bury it.
Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you will only find the good stuff and hopefully will get bored before they find that one blemish.This seems to be working.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394942</id>
	<title>Deny it, enter rehab and become born again</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260442440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>After that you can right a memoir and appear on talk shows.  You won't need another job.</htmltext>
<tokenext>After that you can right a memoir and appear on talk shows .
You wo n't need another job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After that you can right a memoir and appear on talk shows.
You won't need another job.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397206</id>
	<title>Linking to it</title>
	<author>Ponder Stibions</author>
	<datestamp>1260453300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Linking to it from your own website seems like a bad idea.</p><p><a href="http://jessehirsh.com/25-random-things-about-me" title="jessehirsh.com" rel="nofollow">http://jessehirsh.com/25-random-things-about-me</a> [jessehirsh.com]</p><p>Also, given that this page was the first obvious mention in the first 30 Google results, WTF are you worried about? Also WTF link to it from your own site?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Linking to it from your own website seems like a bad idea.http : //jessehirsh.com/25-random-things-about-me [ jessehirsh.com ] Also , given that this page was the first obvious mention in the first 30 Google results , WTF are you worried about ?
Also WTF link to it from your own site ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linking to it from your own website seems like a bad idea.http://jessehirsh.com/25-random-things-about-me [jessehirsh.com]Also, given that this page was the first obvious mention in the first 30 Google results, WTF are you worried about?
Also WTF link to it from your own site?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395132</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>ledow</author>
	<datestamp>1260443160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any employer that relies on search engine information on their candidates to be accurate is a moron, unless they *really* research your background and know precisely which "John Smith" you are.  You wouldn't *want* to work for anyone that just googles your name / college and automatically assumes everything they find is about you.</p><p>If they go far enough to actually research the accuracy of the information they found, you are *not* going to be able to hide anything anyway - they would have been checking with the college and previous employers anyway.  Google my real name and you come up with a PhD in America who has expertise in my field.  It's not me, though, and I've only ever been to America once and never got a PhD.  His results are mixed in randomly with my forum posts, technical articles or random blog links, etc.  A search is unreliable.  A *real* background search would turn up whatever history you have anyway, and falsely denying that is worse than just having it on your record.</p><p>Don't worry about it, live life, work for whomever you please.  If you think it's become a big, well-known problem in your field talk to your employers beforehand and explain that it was just a thing you did when you were younger.  If they can't forgive that, do you *really* want to work for them anyway?  What're they gonna find out about your youth next and hold against you?</p><p>Non-issue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any employer that relies on search engine information on their candidates to be accurate is a moron , unless they * really * research your background and know precisely which " John Smith " you are .
You would n't * want * to work for anyone that just googles your name / college and automatically assumes everything they find is about you.If they go far enough to actually research the accuracy of the information they found , you are * not * going to be able to hide anything anyway - they would have been checking with the college and previous employers anyway .
Google my real name and you come up with a PhD in America who has expertise in my field .
It 's not me , though , and I 've only ever been to America once and never got a PhD .
His results are mixed in randomly with my forum posts , technical articles or random blog links , etc .
A search is unreliable .
A * real * background search would turn up whatever history you have anyway , and falsely denying that is worse than just having it on your record.Do n't worry about it , live life , work for whomever you please .
If you think it 's become a big , well-known problem in your field talk to your employers beforehand and explain that it was just a thing you did when you were younger .
If they ca n't forgive that , do you * really * want to work for them anyway ?
What 're they gon na find out about your youth next and hold against you ? Non-issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any employer that relies on search engine information on their candidates to be accurate is a moron, unless they *really* research your background and know precisely which "John Smith" you are.
You wouldn't *want* to work for anyone that just googles your name / college and automatically assumes everything they find is about you.If they go far enough to actually research the accuracy of the information they found, you are *not* going to be able to hide anything anyway - they would have been checking with the college and previous employers anyway.
Google my real name and you come up with a PhD in America who has expertise in my field.
It's not me, though, and I've only ever been to America once and never got a PhD.
His results are mixed in randomly with my forum posts, technical articles or random blog links, etc.
A search is unreliable.
A *real* background search would turn up whatever history you have anyway, and falsely denying that is worse than just having it on your record.Don't worry about it, live life, work for whomever you please.
If you think it's become a big, well-known problem in your field talk to your employers beforehand and explain that it was just a thing you did when you were younger.
If they can't forgive that, do you *really* want to work for them anyway?
What're they gonna find out about your youth next and hold against you?Non-issue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395372</id>
	<title>Simple</title>
	<author>UnknowingFool</author>
	<datestamp>1260444120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nuke it from orbit.  It's the only way to be sure.  In fact, anyone who posts on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. should already be ready for this eventuality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nuke it from orbit .
It 's the only way to be sure .
In fact , anyone who posts on / .
should already be ready for this eventuality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nuke it from orbit.
It's the only way to be sure.
In fact, anyone who posts on /.
should already be ready for this eventuality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394834</id>
	<title>Re:Why bother?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260442080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about telling the truth?<br>It probably happened a decade ago. Even if I did find it I am not so sure that I would put a lot of credence in an old BBS text file from that long ago.<br>If I was interviewing and had found that I might ask about it.<br>If I got the answer "Yes I had a little talk with my university about that and they let me off with a warning, boy did I learn from that!" I would probably mark it down as a positive.<br>If I got a No not me never did that and you started to sweat I would keep looking.<br>If it was in a position that required a security clearance then you better tell the truth. They will find it and they will go there and find out if it was you. If you lied you will NEVER get a clearance ever.<br>You did it, it is documented. Odds are nobody will care if you tell the truth. They will care if you lie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about telling the truth ? It probably happened a decade ago .
Even if I did find it I am not so sure that I would put a lot of credence in an old BBS text file from that long ago.If I was interviewing and had found that I might ask about it.If I got the answer " Yes I had a little talk with my university about that and they let me off with a warning , boy did I learn from that !
" I would probably mark it down as a positive.If I got a No not me never did that and you started to sweat I would keep looking.If it was in a position that required a security clearance then you better tell the truth .
They will find it and they will go there and find out if it was you .
If you lied you will NEVER get a clearance ever.You did it , it is documented .
Odds are nobody will care if you tell the truth .
They will care if you lie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about telling the truth?It probably happened a decade ago.
Even if I did find it I am not so sure that I would put a lot of credence in an old BBS text file from that long ago.If I was interviewing and had found that I might ask about it.If I got the answer "Yes I had a little talk with my university about that and they let me off with a warning, boy did I learn from that!
" I would probably mark it down as a positive.If I got a No not me never did that and you started to sweat I would keep looking.If it was in a position that required a security clearance then you better tell the truth.
They will find it and they will go there and find out if it was you.
If you lied you will NEVER get a clearance ever.You did it, it is documented.
Odds are nobody will care if you tell the truth.
They will care if you lie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394576</id>
	<title>Re:Use it in the interview..</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1260441300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're assuming:</p><p>A) What he did showed technical aptitude.<br>B) He's applying for a technical position.</p><p>I think if both were true, yes, that's reasonable. Otherwise you can only use it as a learning experience, and only if they bring it up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're assuming : A ) What he did showed technical aptitude.B ) He 's applying for a technical position.I think if both were true , yes , that 's reasonable .
Otherwise you can only use it as a learning experience , and only if they bring it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're assuming:A) What he did showed technical aptitude.B) He's applying for a technical position.I think if both were true, yes, that's reasonable.
Otherwise you can only use it as a learning experience, and only if they bring it up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401220</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>HellYeahAutomaton</author>
	<datestamp>1260544500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While you may consider the photograph your work, and taking away such as removal of<br>merit of the photographer, the act of theft and right to one's own image and soul are at stake in addition to other factors.</p><p>There are amateur photographers and there are those who make their livelihood from it. Those who make their livelihood require consent and written release from their subjects. Unless there is an equal exchange between photographer and subject, the subject is being exploited without compensation.</p><p>&gt;If it did, we'd be living in a very different world right now, with every journalist, blogger, &gt;photographer, and webmaster busily rewriting history, pro bono, for anyone who has a problem &gt;with the past.</p><p>We do not have nearly as many storefronts with buggy whip manufacturer logos on them because times have changed.  CNN's web site yesterday was not the same as it was today. Your every journalist, blogger, photographer and web master wants all the benefits without the RESPONSIBILITY of being what they really are: publishers and editors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While you may consider the photograph your work , and taking away such as removal ofmerit of the photographer , the act of theft and right to one 's own image and soul are at stake in addition to other factors.There are amateur photographers and there are those who make their livelihood from it .
Those who make their livelihood require consent and written release from their subjects .
Unless there is an equal exchange between photographer and subject , the subject is being exploited without compensation. &gt; If it did , we 'd be living in a very different world right now , with every journalist , blogger , &gt; photographer , and webmaster busily rewriting history , pro bono , for anyone who has a problem &gt; with the past.We do not have nearly as many storefronts with buggy whip manufacturer logos on them because times have changed .
CNN 's web site yesterday was not the same as it was today .
Your every journalist , blogger , photographer and web master wants all the benefits without the RESPONSIBILITY of being what they really are : publishers and editors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While you may consider the photograph your work, and taking away such as removal ofmerit of the photographer, the act of theft and right to one's own image and soul are at stake in addition to other factors.There are amateur photographers and there are those who make their livelihood from it.
Those who make their livelihood require consent and written release from their subjects.
Unless there is an equal exchange between photographer and subject, the subject is being exploited without compensation.&gt;If it did, we'd be living in a very different world right now, with every journalist, blogger, &gt;photographer, and webmaster busily rewriting history, pro bono, for anyone who has a problem &gt;with the past.We do not have nearly as many storefronts with buggy whip manufacturer logos on them because times have changed.
CNN's web site yesterday was not the same as it was today.
Your every journalist, blogger, photographer and web master wants all the benefits without the RESPONSIBILITY of being what they really are: publishers and editors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30404816</id>
	<title>Just in case...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260559440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just in case his name is Shawn M. Chorse, everyone should know that he likes damaging people's reputations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just in case his name is Shawn M. Chorse , everyone should know that he likes damaging people 's reputations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just in case his name is Shawn M. Chorse, everyone should know that he likes damaging people's reputations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30421632</id>
	<title>Re:How common is your name?</title>
	<author>misnohmer</author>
	<datestamp>1260704400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Option 5) Change your name. Not so difficult unless you're living in Quebec, Canada.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Option 5 ) Change your name .
Not so difficult unless you 're living in Quebec , Canada .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Option 5) Change your name.
Not so difficult unless you're living in Quebec, Canada.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401680</id>
	<title>Opposites attract</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1260546720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would say if anything that would be a positive thing not a negative.</p><p>Considering how difficult it would be for the average manager to even KNOW about let alone FIND that information on the internet, well it really is a moot point.</p><p>If the manager DOES know about this sort of stuff, and actually reads textfiles (as I recall this was back in the era of BBS's and "computer enthusiasts"), I think he would likely be more impressed you are actually mentioned in them, and think you might be someone special.</p><p>That said, you never did say what it was you did, and perhaps that matters. If you dabbled in some phone phreaking or cracking, big deal. The thing back in the day was to see if you could gain access to something just to see if you could, everything was new. Its not like now, where it's to steal money and extort people, steal identities, or other nefarious actions.</p><p>Of course if what you regret is getting caught by campus security attempting to make sweet love to the university computer system, then the potential employer may think you odd and take a pass.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would say if anything that would be a positive thing not a negative.Considering how difficult it would be for the average manager to even KNOW about let alone FIND that information on the internet , well it really is a moot point.If the manager DOES know about this sort of stuff , and actually reads textfiles ( as I recall this was back in the era of BBS 's and " computer enthusiasts " ) , I think he would likely be more impressed you are actually mentioned in them , and think you might be someone special.That said , you never did say what it was you did , and perhaps that matters .
If you dabbled in some phone phreaking or cracking , big deal .
The thing back in the day was to see if you could gain access to something just to see if you could , everything was new .
Its not like now , where it 's to steal money and extort people , steal identities , or other nefarious actions.Of course if what you regret is getting caught by campus security attempting to make sweet love to the university computer system , then the potential employer may think you odd and take a pass .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would say if anything that would be a positive thing not a negative.Considering how difficult it would be for the average manager to even KNOW about let alone FIND that information on the internet, well it really is a moot point.If the manager DOES know about this sort of stuff, and actually reads textfiles (as I recall this was back in the era of BBS's and "computer enthusiasts"), I think he would likely be more impressed you are actually mentioned in them, and think you might be someone special.That said, you never did say what it was you did, and perhaps that matters.
If you dabbled in some phone phreaking or cracking, big deal.
The thing back in the day was to see if you could gain access to something just to see if you could, everything was new.
Its not like now, where it's to steal money and extort people, steal identities, or other nefarious actions.Of course if what you regret is getting caught by campus security attempting to make sweet love to the university computer system, then the potential employer may think you odd and take a pass.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398116</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260462060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No excuse.  And the Mac has auto spell checking, so that's a double whammy on you.  Now this post on the net with all your mistakes forever.  This will be seen on every job application you ever fill out.  You're doomed as much as this other guy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No excuse .
And the Mac has auto spell checking , so that 's a double whammy on you .
Now this post on the net with all your mistakes forever .
This will be seen on every job application you ever fill out .
You 're doomed as much as this other guy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No excuse.
And the Mac has auto spell checking, so that's a double whammy on you.
Now this post on the net with all your mistakes forever.
This will be seen on every job application you ever fill out.
You're doomed as much as this other guy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398072</id>
	<title>Wrong assesment.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260461340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're worried about what's on the internet and what others will think.</p><p>After all is said and done, if you're ok about it with your inner self, then great. If not, if you're like me and my personal demons, you're in for some serious regret.</p><p>I say do what you can to:<br>a) undo what's possible;<br>b) repair what can't be undone;<br>c) compensate what can't be repaired;<br>d) contribute if compensation is no longer an option and<br>e) resign yourself to it.</p><p>We're just some specks of dust, in the end.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're worried about what 's on the internet and what others will think.After all is said and done , if you 're ok about it with your inner self , then great .
If not , if you 're like me and my personal demons , you 're in for some serious regret.I say do what you can to : a ) undo what 's possible ; b ) repair what ca n't be undone ; c ) compensate what ca n't be repaired ; d ) contribute if compensation is no longer an option ande ) resign yourself to it.We 're just some specks of dust , in the end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're worried about what's on the internet and what others will think.After all is said and done, if you're ok about it with your inner self, then great.
If not, if you're like me and my personal demons, you're in for some serious regret.I say do what you can to:a) undo what's possible;b) repair what can't be undone;c) compensate what can't be repaired;d) contribute if compensation is no longer an option ande) resign yourself to it.We're just some specks of dust, in the end.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394934</id>
	<title>Re:Why bother?</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1260442380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In which case, as LWATCDR said, if they find out you did do it and lied about it... well, I guess that just shows how much you've changed since your "youthful days."  Uh-huh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In which case , as LWATCDR said , if they find out you did do it and lied about it... well , I guess that just shows how much you 've changed since your " youthful days .
" Uh-huh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In which case, as LWATCDR said, if they find out you did do it and lied about it... well, I guess that just shows how much you've changed since your "youthful days.
"  Uh-huh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394780</id>
	<title>Is that you?</title>
	<author>An anonymous Frank</author>
	<datestamp>1260441900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>zerocool?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>zerocool ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>zerocool?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395058</id>
	<title>Raging homophobe?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260442920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, look... it's Charles Whealton.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , look... it 's Charles Whealton .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, look... it's Charles Whealton.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395814</id>
	<title>Hi, Everyone!</title>
	<author>Jason Scott</author>
	<datestamp>1260445680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just wanted to mention how Slashdot never fails to disappoint.</p><p>For the record, textfiles.com has no ads. None. Going to it or not going to it doesn't affect my revenue/income particularly. I don't run that site for money.</p><p>But if you'd rather hear a much funnier story about the legal threats I get, please watch my video <a href="http://vimeo.com/7638539" title="vimeo.com">That Awesome Time I Was Sued for Two Billion Dollars</a> [vimeo.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just wanted to mention how Slashdot never fails to disappoint.For the record , textfiles.com has no ads .
None. Going to it or not going to it does n't affect my revenue/income particularly .
I do n't run that site for money.But if you 'd rather hear a much funnier story about the legal threats I get , please watch my video That Awesome Time I Was Sued for Two Billion Dollars [ vimeo.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just wanted to mention how Slashdot never fails to disappoint.For the record, textfiles.com has no ads.
None. Going to it or not going to it doesn't affect my revenue/income particularly.
I don't run that site for money.But if you'd rather hear a much funnier story about the legal threats I get, please watch my video That Awesome Time I Was Sued for Two Billion Dollars [vimeo.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395588</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1260444900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sorry for the typos - I'm typing on a mac.<br>I'm not usd to this keyboard'</p></div><p>There goes any chance you have of ever working for Apple.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry for the typos - I 'm typing on a mac.I 'm not usd to this keyboard'There goes any chance you have of ever working for Apple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry for the typos - I'm typing on a mac.I'm not usd to this keyboard'There goes any chance you have of ever working for Apple.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395364</id>
	<title>Re:Street cred</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1260444060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I played sports right up to the point I realized I could buy a trophy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I played sports right up to the point I realized I could buy a trophy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I played sports right up to the point I realized I could buy a trophy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30403662</id>
	<title>Re:smokescreen</title>
	<author>Slashdot Parent</author>
	<datestamp>1260554760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and i'm not sure of US law in this manner, but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned?</p></div><p>I am not aware of any jurisdiction where "People who were accused of a crime but the charges were dropped" is a protected class.  But even if it was, it would be difficult to prove that that was the reason for the denial.</p><p>I deal with Fair Housing law all the time, and you'll hear the phrase, "Find a legal reason to reject" used a lot, to get rid of people who you don't like, but may be a protected class member.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and i 'm not sure of US law in this manner , but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned ? I am not aware of any jurisdiction where " People who were accused of a crime but the charges were dropped " is a protected class .
But even if it was , it would be difficult to prove that that was the reason for the denial.I deal with Fair Housing law all the time , and you 'll hear the phrase , " Find a legal reason to reject " used a lot , to get rid of people who you do n't like , but may be a protected class member .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and i'm not sure of US law in this manner, but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned?I am not aware of any jurisdiction where "People who were accused of a crime but the charges were dropped" is a protected class.
But even if it was, it would be difficult to prove that that was the reason for the denial.I deal with Fair Housing law all the time, and you'll hear the phrase, "Find a legal reason to reject" used a lot, to get rid of people who you don't like, but may be a protected class member.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394450</id>
	<title>Live with it.</title>
	<author>qoncept</author>
	<datestamp>1260440820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just live with it. A reasonable person can see the difference between a simple mistake years ago (especially if there is no conviction) and a habitual law breaker. I sold alcohol to a minor because I was too lazy to check an ID, and it turned out to be a sting. It didn't ruin my life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just live with it .
A reasonable person can see the difference between a simple mistake years ago ( especially if there is no conviction ) and a habitual law breaker .
I sold alcohol to a minor because I was too lazy to check an ID , and it turned out to be a sting .
It did n't ruin my life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just live with it.
A reasonable person can see the difference between a simple mistake years ago (especially if there is no conviction) and a habitual law breaker.
I sold alcohol to a minor because I was too lazy to check an ID, and it turned out to be a sting.
It didn't ruin my life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394544</id>
	<title>Attention seeking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What avague and unlikely story...<br>This is up there with claiming you hacked a Gibson...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What avague and unlikely story...This is up there with claiming you hacked a Gibson.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What avague and unlikely story...This is up there with claiming you hacked a Gibson...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394592</id>
	<title>Re:Use it in the interview..</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1260441420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if it's not what you're thinking.</p><p>Alleged Child Pornography?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if it 's not what you 're thinking.Alleged Child Pornography ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if it's not what you're thinking.Alleged Child Pornography?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395744</id>
	<title>that was easy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260445440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm very surprised by how easy it was to narrow the OP down to a handful of candidates. But good news! Googling your possible names along with 'crime', 'criminal', 'university &amp;&amp; crime' and so on didn't ever bring anything linking you to your mistake on the first three pages. Will some employers check more deeply? Probably. But go to a 'net cafe and search for your name along with keywords; looks like you're in the clear.</p><p>Unless one of your potential employers was a big reader of 90s h/p zines. (What? One can wish!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm very surprised by how easy it was to narrow the OP down to a handful of candidates .
But good news !
Googling your possible names along with 'crime ' , 'criminal ' , 'university &amp;&amp; crime ' and so on did n't ever bring anything linking you to your mistake on the first three pages .
Will some employers check more deeply ?
Probably. But go to a 'net cafe and search for your name along with keywords ; looks like you 're in the clear.Unless one of your potential employers was a big reader of 90s h/p zines .
( What ? One can wish !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm very surprised by how easy it was to narrow the OP down to a handful of candidates.
But good news!
Googling your possible names along with 'crime', 'criminal', 'university &amp;&amp; crime' and so on didn't ever bring anything linking you to your mistake on the first three pages.
Will some employers check more deeply?
Probably. But go to a 'net cafe and search for your name along with keywords; looks like you're in the clear.Unless one of your potential employers was a big reader of 90s h/p zines.
(What? One can wish!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396212</id>
	<title>Copy, delete, new, paste</title>
	<author>Cajun Hell</author>
	<datestamp>1260447180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Copy yourself to the clipboard and then delete yourself.  Create a new record and then paste yourself from the clipboard and save.  You'll then have a new primary key, and references to the <em>old</em> you will be orphaned, or maybe even delete themselves depending on how serious the engine is when it comes to referential integrity constraints.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Copy yourself to the clipboard and then delete yourself .
Create a new record and then paste yourself from the clipboard and save .
You 'll then have a new primary key , and references to the old you will be orphaned , or maybe even delete themselves depending on how serious the engine is when it comes to referential integrity constraints .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Copy yourself to the clipboard and then delete yourself.
Create a new record and then paste yourself from the clipboard and save.
You'll then have a new primary key, and references to the old you will be orphaned, or maybe even delete themselves depending on how serious the engine is when it comes to referential integrity constraints.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395208</id>
	<title>huh, who could be this dim</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260443520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You intentionally mentioned textfiles.com and a university mistake on slashdot?<br>I don't believe you are this retard.<br>You couldn't have made a bigger advertisement for this.<br>Are you sure you are the original person, or someone who wants to smear someone else?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You intentionally mentioned textfiles.com and a university mistake on slashdot ? I do n't believe you are this retard.You could n't have made a bigger advertisement for this.Are you sure you are the original person , or someone who wants to smear someone else ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You intentionally mentioned textfiles.com and a university mistake on slashdot?I don't believe you are this retard.You couldn't have made a bigger advertisement for this.Are you sure you are the original person, or someone who wants to smear someone else?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394484</id>
	<title>Google Webpage Removal Request Tool</title>
	<author>jornak</author>
	<datestamp>1260441000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=92865" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=92865</a> [google.com]</p><p>That's at least one giant step in the right direction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py ? answer = 92865 [ google.com ] That 's at least one giant step in the right direction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=92865 [google.com]That's at least one giant step in the right direction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394680</id>
	<title>Re:Not keeping low profile?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You cannot cease and desist factual information. If you burglarize someone's home and that person posts the entire story of the incident online (even complete with photos), there is fuck all you can do about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can not cease and desist factual information .
If you burglarize someone 's home and that person posts the entire story of the incident online ( even complete with photos ) , there is fuck all you can do about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You cannot cease and desist factual information.
If you burglarize someone's home and that person posts the entire story of the incident online (even complete with photos), there is fuck all you can do about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30419986</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260639420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Either the submitter isn't Jesse Hirsh, or he's being awfully misleading.  Jesse is the last person in the world about whom it could fairly be said that he's "generally tried to keep a low profile online".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Either the submitter is n't Jesse Hirsh , or he 's being awfully misleading .
Jesse is the last person in the world about whom it could fairly be said that he 's " generally tried to keep a low profile online " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Either the submitter isn't Jesse Hirsh, or he's being awfully misleading.
Jesse is the last person in the world about whom it could fairly be said that he's "generally tried to keep a low profile online".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395412</id>
	<title>Here's how</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1260444240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Legally change your name to John Doe, or something similiar. Then break into all the databases used for the name change, and delete the information. Just to make sure, kill everyone who knows you changed your name. Burn down your house, your parents house, all the schools you went to, all the places you worked, your classmates houses, the auto license bureau, the Social Security Administration, and anyplace that may have you old name on record or any photos of you.</p><p>If anyone finds this after that, you'll just have to say "that must have been another xxxx".</p><p>By the way, instead of doing it on a computer, wouldn't a table in an empty office have been better?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Legally change your name to John Doe , or something similiar .
Then break into all the databases used for the name change , and delete the information .
Just to make sure , kill everyone who knows you changed your name .
Burn down your house , your parents house , all the schools you went to , all the places you worked , your classmates houses , the auto license bureau , the Social Security Administration , and anyplace that may have you old name on record or any photos of you.If anyone finds this after that , you 'll just have to say " that must have been another xxxx " .By the way , instead of doing it on a computer , would n't a table in an empty office have been better ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Legally change your name to John Doe, or something similiar.
Then break into all the databases used for the name change, and delete the information.
Just to make sure, kill everyone who knows you changed your name.
Burn down your house, your parents house, all the schools you went to, all the places you worked, your classmates houses, the auto license bureau, the Social Security Administration, and anyplace that may have you old name on record or any photos of you.If anyone finds this after that, you'll just have to say "that must have been another xxxx".By the way, instead of doing it on a computer, wouldn't a table in an empty office have been better?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397574</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1260456540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig. Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.</p></div>


</blockquote><p>The statute of limitations is for being charged with a crime. Why should someone not be able to look far into your past in order to better predict your future behaviors as an employee? If it's an inaccurate method, then it's obviously a bad idea to do, because it'll result in unnecessarily passing up good candidates.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>IMHO just as thre 's a 7-year stature of limitations on law , so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig .
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant .
The statute of limitations is for being charged with a crime .
Why should someone not be able to look far into your past in order to better predict your future behaviors as an employee ?
If it 's an inaccurate method , then it 's obviously a bad idea to do , because it 'll result in unnecessarily passing up good candidates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig.
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.
The statute of limitations is for being charged with a crime.
Why should someone not be able to look far into your past in order to better predict your future behaviors as an employee?
If it's an inaccurate method, then it's obviously a bad idea to do, because it'll result in unnecessarily passing up good candidates.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395830</id>
	<title>You are screwed!</title>
	<author>topcoder</author>
	<datestamp>1260445740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I Albert Walter from Wisconsin, did something similar as you, several years ago, i stole private information  from my company (Software Systems, Inc).

I, however, didn't make your mistake, i never told anyone or claimed to do it on the internet, because i knew i would be doomed if i did that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I Albert Walter from Wisconsin , did something similar as you , several years ago , i stole private information from my company ( Software Systems , Inc ) .
I , however , did n't make your mistake , i never told anyone or claimed to do it on the internet , because i knew i would be doomed if i did that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I Albert Walter from Wisconsin, did something similar as you, several years ago, i stole private information  from my company (Software Systems, Inc).
I, however, didn't make your mistake, i never told anyone or claimed to do it on the internet, because i knew i would be doomed if i did that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399096</id>
	<title>Re:The best thing you can do is post on /.</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1260564660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I smell another "I know what you did last summer" sequel...  smells really really bad...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I smell another " I know what you did last summer " sequel... smells really really bad.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I smell another "I know what you did last summer" sequel...  smells really really bad...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401850</id>
	<title>Re:you bet I've had similar concerns</title>
	<author>Myopic</author>
	<datestamp>1260547440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, how are you going to post that without telling us the forum where we can get Viagra!? This post useless without links!</p><p>Also, the way I see it the solution to your problem is obvious: begin a career selling Viagra online.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , how are you going to post that without telling us the forum where we can get Viagra ! ?
This post useless without links ! Also , the way I see it the solution to your problem is obvious : begin a career selling Viagra online .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, how are you going to post that without telling us the forum where we can get Viagra!?
This post useless without links!Also, the way I see it the solution to your problem is obvious: begin a career selling Viagra online.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394536</id>
	<title>Just explain it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And for the future, name all of your kids John Smith.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And for the future , name all of your kids John Smith .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And for the future, name all of your kids John Smith.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394492</id>
	<title>Suicide is your only realistic option</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Face it. Life is not worth living anymore. Time to bite the bullet or take the "long swim".
<p>You will be haunted by this all your life so you might as well end it all now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Face it .
Life is not worth living anymore .
Time to bite the bullet or take the " long swim " .
You will be haunted by this all your life so you might as well end it all now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Face it.
Life is not worth living anymore.
Time to bite the bullet or take the "long swim".
You will be haunted by this all your life so you might as well end it all now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395032</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>contrapunctus</author>
	<datestamp>1260442800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>bury it with new content with your name. nobody looks past the first few pages of a search.</htmltext>
<tokenext>bury it with new content with your name .
nobody looks past the first few pages of a search .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bury it with new content with your name.
nobody looks past the first few pages of a search.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395496</id>
	<title>Re:Use it in the interview..</title>
	<author>gurps\_npc</author>
	<datestamp>1260444480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like this.  It is a far better response than most other gave here (which generally centered on the 'needle in the haystack' response).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like this .
It is a far better response than most other gave here ( which generally centered on the 'needle in the haystack ' response ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like this.
It is a far better response than most other gave here (which generally centered on the 'needle in the haystack' response).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397076</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>pla</author>
	<datestamp>1260452340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I'm sure I could honor requests to remove all of these photos, but I simply don't want to. It involves a lot of time and effort on my end, to accomplish something that's actively taking away from things I take pride in myself.</i> <br>
<br>
So basically, you take pride in getting people turned down for jobs in a shit economy because you won't take a few 10YO pics offline.  Wow dude, you need to meet some of these people in a dark alley.<br>
<br>
Of course, if you consider yourself such an awesome photographer that you just can't bear to ruin the artistic integrity of your site, you could always, y'know, redact their <b>names</b>.<br>
<br>
As for how you got modded "insightful", just... Wow.  I <i>hope</i> you just managed to sneak a troll post (or some form of sarcasm I totally missed) past the mods, because if serious, you really do suck as a human being.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure I could honor requests to remove all of these photos , but I simply do n't want to .
It involves a lot of time and effort on my end , to accomplish something that 's actively taking away from things I take pride in myself .
So basically , you take pride in getting people turned down for jobs in a shit economy because you wo n't take a few 10YO pics offline .
Wow dude , you need to meet some of these people in a dark alley .
Of course , if you consider yourself such an awesome photographer that you just ca n't bear to ruin the artistic integrity of your site , you could always , y'know , redact their names .
As for how you got modded " insightful " , just... Wow. I hope you just managed to sneak a troll post ( or some form of sarcasm I totally missed ) past the mods , because if serious , you really do suck as a human being .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure I could honor requests to remove all of these photos, but I simply don't want to.
It involves a lot of time and effort on my end, to accomplish something that's actively taking away from things I take pride in myself.
So basically, you take pride in getting people turned down for jobs in a shit economy because you won't take a few 10YO pics offline.
Wow dude, you need to meet some of these people in a dark alley.
Of course, if you consider yourself such an awesome photographer that you just can't bear to ruin the artistic integrity of your site, you could always, y'know, redact their names.
As for how you got modded "insightful", just... Wow.  I hope you just managed to sneak a troll post (or some form of sarcasm I totally missed) past the mods, because if serious, you really do suck as a human being.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394428</id>
	<title>Not possible anymore</title>
	<author>linuxgurugamer</author>
	<datestamp>1260440760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not much you can do now, in regards to your online presence.</p><p>If an employer asks, calmy explain that it was a youthful mistake.  Emphasize that you have not done anything like that since, and that you have a clean record.</p><p>Worst case: change your name.l</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not much you can do now , in regards to your online presence.If an employer asks , calmy explain that it was a youthful mistake .
Emphasize that you have not done anything like that since , and that you have a clean record.Worst case : change your name.l</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not much you can do now, in regards to your online presence.If an employer asks, calmy explain that it was a youthful mistake.
Emphasize that you have not done anything like that since, and that you have a clean record.Worst case: change your name.l</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394850</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1260442140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure. Wait, what were we talking about again?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nuke it from orbit , it 's the only way to be sure .
Wait , what were we talking about again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.
Wait, what were we talking about again?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394992</id>
	<title>You can't erase it, but...</title>
	<author>JonStewartMill</author>
	<datestamp>1260442680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... you can muddy the waters somewhat.  I just ran across this bit of advice today, as a matter of fact:

"If you're worried about [something you wish you hadn't said publicly] showing up on the search engines, then might I suggest posting to as many different online forums as you can find, making sure to sign your real name to each of them. Cat got your tongue? Simply scroll up three (3) posts, quote a sentence from it, and then say, "I fully agree with that!" Then sign your full name and click the "Post" button. It's that simple.

Posting to numerous online forums will get your name all over the web, but not in any context that would matter to anybody. With your name showing up several dozen times in the search engine, this one story will cease to stand out as anything significant.

(Any type of forum will do, but computer repair forums are the best for this purpose because the computer repair guys do this for advertising and they always make sure to get their forums listed on all the search engines.)"


Courtesy of <a href="http://www.positiveatheism.org/index.shtml" title="positiveatheism.org" rel="nofollow">Positive Atheism</a> [positiveatheism.org]</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... you can muddy the waters somewhat .
I just ran across this bit of advice today , as a matter of fact : " If you 're worried about [ something you wish you had n't said publicly ] showing up on the search engines , then might I suggest posting to as many different online forums as you can find , making sure to sign your real name to each of them .
Cat got your tongue ?
Simply scroll up three ( 3 ) posts , quote a sentence from it , and then say , " I fully agree with that !
" Then sign your full name and click the " Post " button .
It 's that simple .
Posting to numerous online forums will get your name all over the web , but not in any context that would matter to anybody .
With your name showing up several dozen times in the search engine , this one story will cease to stand out as anything significant .
( Any type of forum will do , but computer repair forums are the best for this purpose because the computer repair guys do this for advertising and they always make sure to get their forums listed on all the search engines .
) " Courtesy of Positive Atheism [ positiveatheism.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... you can muddy the waters somewhat.
I just ran across this bit of advice today, as a matter of fact:

"If you're worried about [something you wish you hadn't said publicly] showing up on the search engines, then might I suggest posting to as many different online forums as you can find, making sure to sign your real name to each of them.
Cat got your tongue?
Simply scroll up three (3) posts, quote a sentence from it, and then say, "I fully agree with that!
" Then sign your full name and click the "Post" button.
It's that simple.
Posting to numerous online forums will get your name all over the web, but not in any context that would matter to anybody.
With your name showing up several dozen times in the search engine, this one story will cease to stand out as anything significant.
(Any type of forum will do, but computer repair forums are the best for this purpose because the computer repair guys do this for advertising and they always make sure to get their forums listed on all the search engines.
)"


Courtesy of Positive Atheism [positiveatheism.org]
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395522</id>
	<title>The guys is begging for "donations" . . .</title>
	<author>fuzzylollipop</author>
	<datestamp>1260444600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I bet if you made a "donation" he might be more apt to clean up anything you want purged.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet if you made a " donation " he might be more apt to clean up anything you want purged .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet if you made a "donation" he might be more apt to clean up anything you want purged.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395230</id>
	<title>Yeah, you can always change your name</title>
	<author>Colin Smith</author>
	<datestamp>1260443580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Smith is a good choice if you're on the run from the police.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Smith is a good choice if you 're on the run from the police .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Smith is a good choice if you're on the run from the police.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399428</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260526080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right. What is so hard about understanding this? Try putting your name on ten things that are worth the attention of many people and that will attract a lot of search traffic and those results won't probably show on the first page.<br>Or, you can always say that isn't you, because probably, someone else has your name.<br>Better yet, have a son and name him like you. Then blame it on him<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right .
What is so hard about understanding this ?
Try putting your name on ten things that are worth the attention of many people and that will attract a lot of search traffic and those results wo n't probably show on the first page.Or , you can always say that is n't you , because probably , someone else has your name.Better yet , have a son and name him like you .
Then blame it on him : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right.
What is so hard about understanding this?
Try putting your name on ten things that are worth the attention of many people and that will attract a lot of search traffic and those results won't probably show on the first page.Or, you can always say that isn't you, because probably, someone else has your name.Better yet, have a son and name him like you.
Then blame it on him :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394608</id>
	<title>Re:smokescreen</title>
	<author>bcmm</author>
	<datestamp>1260441420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>and i'm not sure of US law in this manner, but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned?</p></div></blockquote><p>Does it matter? I'm sure it's not illegal to decide that something you read in another applicant's CV is so totally awesome that it's not worth looking at that other guy any more.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and i 'm not sure of US law in this manner , but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned ? Does it matter ?
I 'm sure it 's not illegal to decide that something you read in another applicant 's CV is so totally awesome that it 's not worth looking at that other guy any more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and i'm not sure of US law in this manner, but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned?Does it matter?
I'm sure it's not illegal to decide that something you read in another applicant's CV is so totally awesome that it's not worth looking at that other guy any more.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397126</id>
	<title>Re:Live with it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260452760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is this insightful?  It's illegal in every state I've ever been employed in to ask if anyone has ever been arrested.  You can ask if they have any pending trials in some of them--and of course, asking if they've been convicted is fair game.</p><p>Yeah--getting arrested, and not convicted--that's nothing.  If they pull arrest records in the background check and you can show that they even *probably*  read it, you've got standing for a discrimination lawsuit in many states.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this insightful ?
It 's illegal in every state I 've ever been employed in to ask if anyone has ever been arrested .
You can ask if they have any pending trials in some of them--and of course , asking if they 've been convicted is fair game.Yeah--getting arrested , and not convicted--that 's nothing .
If they pull arrest records in the background check and you can show that they even * probably * read it , you 've got standing for a discrimination lawsuit in many states .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this insightful?
It's illegal in every state I've ever been employed in to ask if anyone has ever been arrested.
You can ask if they have any pending trials in some of them--and of course, asking if they've been convicted is fair game.Yeah--getting arrested, and not convicted--that's nothing.
If they pull arrest records in the background check and you can show that they even *probably*  read it, you've got standing for a discrimination lawsuit in many states.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394774</id>
	<title>Exactly</title>
	<author>GameGod0</author>
	<datestamp>1260441900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only way to control your name on the internet is to use assert control over it by using it actively. Make yourself known on the internet in a way you want to be known, so that this oddball reference to you gets buried into obscurity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only way to control your name on the internet is to use assert control over it by using it actively .
Make yourself known on the internet in a way you want to be known , so that this oddball reference to you gets buried into obscurity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only way to control your name on the internet is to use assert control over it by using it actively.
Make yourself known on the internet in a way you want to be known, so that this oddball reference to you gets buried into obscurity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394502</id>
	<title>Re:Not keeping low profile?</title>
	<author>ksd1337</author>
	<datestamp>1260441000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can write cease-and-desist letters to the webmasters of sites with information about yourself you would like removed. Alternatively, there are companies who will do all this work for you for a price.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can write cease-and-desist letters to the webmasters of sites with information about yourself you would like removed .
Alternatively , there are companies who will do all this work for you for a price .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can write cease-and-desist letters to the webmasters of sites with information about yourself you would like removed.
Alternatively, there are companies who will do all this work for you for a price.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401068</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1260543780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The internet never forgets. The offending material will always be there.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
It may be there, but the average HR drone doing a quick google search isn't going to find it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The internet never forgets .
The offending material will always be there .
It may be there , but the average HR drone doing a quick google search is n't going to find it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The internet never forgets.
The offending material will always be there.
It may be there, but the average HR drone doing a quick google search isn't going to find it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396782</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>dadorg</author>
	<datestamp>1260450360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The internet never forgets.  The offending material will always be there.  The best thing to do is to bury it.  Become an active participant on multiple forums, everything from albacore tuna fishing to zoology (avoid politics and religion).  Use your real, full name.  Post as much as you can type.  In about a year, a search for you will turn up 20 pages of friendly links, most people will stop after page 3.  The offending articles will be stale dated and buried at the bottom of the pile.  Post to professional forums the most but also non-professional forums so they see that you have a real life as well.  You could also try to publish some articles in professional journals (online and dead tree), they should score higher than forum posts.  Good Luck.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The internet never forgets .
The offending material will always be there .
The best thing to do is to bury it .
Become an active participant on multiple forums , everything from albacore tuna fishing to zoology ( avoid politics and religion ) .
Use your real , full name .
Post as much as you can type .
In about a year , a search for you will turn up 20 pages of friendly links , most people will stop after page 3 .
The offending articles will be stale dated and buried at the bottom of the pile .
Post to professional forums the most but also non-professional forums so they see that you have a real life as well .
You could also try to publish some articles in professional journals ( online and dead tree ) , they should score higher than forum posts .
Good Luck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The internet never forgets.
The offending material will always be there.
The best thing to do is to bury it.
Become an active participant on multiple forums, everything from albacore tuna fishing to zoology (avoid politics and religion).
Use your real, full name.
Post as much as you can type.
In about a year, a search for you will turn up 20 pages of friendly links, most people will stop after page 3.
The offending articles will be stale dated and buried at the bottom of the pile.
Post to professional forums the most but also non-professional forums so they see that you have a real life as well.
You could also try to publish some articles in professional journals (online and dead tree), they should score higher than forum posts.
Good Luck.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398220</id>
	<title>Re:you bet I've had similar concerns</title>
	<author>2ms</author>
	<datestamp>1260463980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why did this get modded up as informative?  It's almost like people completely didn't get my post.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did this get modded up as informative ?
It 's almost like people completely did n't get my post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why did this get modded up as informative?
It's almost like people completely didn't get my post.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30416680</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>alfielee</author>
	<datestamp>1260608940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Truth has to be stated that this article could well be a hoax being written so lovingly by an anonymous, who therefore has no credibility whatsoever</htmltext>
<tokenext>Truth has to be stated that this article could well be a hoax being written so lovingly by an anonymous , who therefore has no credibility whatsoever</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Truth has to be stated that this article could well be a hoax being written so lovingly by an anonymous, who therefore has no credibility whatsoever</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394842</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260442080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you should have been anonymous from day one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you should have been anonymous from day one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you should have been anonymous from day one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396898</id>
	<title>Anonymous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260450960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you don't want an information to spread, simply don't inject it into the system. If you are afraid that what you do might be defamatory, then simply don't do it. If you think that what you do might be controversial, but you deeply believe that it is the right thing to do - then do it and forget about the consequences.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you do n't want an information to spread , simply do n't inject it into the system .
If you are afraid that what you do might be defamatory , then simply do n't do it .
If you think that what you do might be controversial , but you deeply believe that it is the right thing to do - then do it and forget about the consequences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you don't want an information to spread, simply don't inject it into the system.
If you are afraid that what you do might be defamatory, then simply don't do it.
If you think that what you do might be controversial, but you deeply believe that it is the right thing to do - then do it and forget about the consequences.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400894</id>
	<title>Re:How common is your name?</title>
	<author>LanMan04</author>
	<datestamp>1260542760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Admit nothing, deny everything, make counter-accusations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Admit nothing , deny everything , make counter-accusations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Admit nothing, deny everything, make counter-accusations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398182</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260463380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>MY MAC'S DEAD. I installed Security update 2009-005, rebooted, and now it won't startup. Maybe an MS programmer wrote it</i> <br> <br>Or maybe Macs don't really live up to the hype? That's the more likely answer. I guess fanbois always have an excuse when their little false idol shits the bed like every other technology out there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>MY MAC 'S DEAD .
I installed Security update 2009-005 , rebooted , and now it wo n't startup .
Maybe an MS programmer wrote it Or maybe Macs do n't really live up to the hype ?
That 's the more likely answer .
I guess fanbois always have an excuse when their little false idol shits the bed like every other technology out there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MY MAC'S DEAD.
I installed Security update 2009-005, rebooted, and now it won't startup.
Maybe an MS programmer wrote it  Or maybe Macs don't really live up to the hype?
That's the more likely answer.
I guess fanbois always have an excuse when their little false idol shits the bed like every other technology out there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396174</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260447060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not very nice. You could at least remove their last names so they don't show up in Google.</p><p>No offense, but it kind of sounds like you're just being a dick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not very nice .
You could at least remove their last names so they do n't show up in Google.No offense , but it kind of sounds like you 're just being a dick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not very nice.
You could at least remove their last names so they don't show up in Google.No offense, but it kind of sounds like you're just being a dick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399364</id>
	<title>Act like a jock, not like a nerd...</title>
	<author>AliasMarlowe</author>
	<datestamp>1260525240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and forget trying to censor the net - it's a Sisyphean task even for large powerful organizations.
<br> <br>
The best option is just to brazen it out: laugh "The things we did as kids!" or something similar, and give the other guy[*] a pretend-punch on the shoulder. Act like a brash confident jock instead of a wimpy guilt-ridden nerd, dammit.
<br> <br>
[*] If it's a gal, just pull the punch at the last millisecond, pause a moment, then exclaim "geez, now I'm treating you like one of the guys!". Women often claim to hate antics like that, but in my experience, they're likelier to get all wet as a result...</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and forget trying to censor the net - it 's a Sisyphean task even for large powerful organizations .
The best option is just to brazen it out : laugh " The things we did as kids !
" or something similar , and give the other guy [ * ] a pretend-punch on the shoulder .
Act like a brash confident jock instead of a wimpy guilt-ridden nerd , dammit .
[ * ] If it 's a gal , just pull the punch at the last millisecond , pause a moment , then exclaim " geez , now I 'm treating you like one of the guys ! " .
Women often claim to hate antics like that , but in my experience , they 're likelier to get all wet as a result.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and forget trying to censor the net - it's a Sisyphean task even for large powerful organizations.
The best option is just to brazen it out: laugh "The things we did as kids!
" or something similar, and give the other guy[*] a pretend-punch on the shoulder.
Act like a brash confident jock instead of a wimpy guilt-ridden nerd, dammit.
[*] If it's a gal, just pull the punch at the last millisecond, pause a moment, then exclaim "geez, now I'm treating you like one of the guys!".
Women often claim to hate antics like that, but in my experience, they're likelier to get all wet as a result...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397938</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260459600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You pride yourself on being an asshole?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You pride yourself on being an asshole ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You pride yourself on being an asshole?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397708</id>
	<title>spam the web</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260457560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once you're on the web, you're on the web.  The only way to get around it is to create so many other entries, and post so much mundane boring stuff as that they'll never be sure if they're looking at the correct Jonathan Albert Ruffenstein or the one that plays the violin or the one that collects hound dogs, etc.  So, post lots of stuff out there so when they search, they get so many results that they're not sure which one is you, which one isn't, etc.  That's your best bet, my friend.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once you 're on the web , you 're on the web .
The only way to get around it is to create so many other entries , and post so much mundane boring stuff as that they 'll never be sure if they 're looking at the correct Jonathan Albert Ruffenstein or the one that plays the violin or the one that collects hound dogs , etc .
So , post lots of stuff out there so when they search , they get so many results that they 're not sure which one is you , which one is n't , etc .
That 's your best bet , my friend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once you're on the web, you're on the web.
The only way to get around it is to create so many other entries, and post so much mundane boring stuff as that they'll never be sure if they're looking at the correct Jonathan Albert Ruffenstein or the one that plays the violin or the one that collects hound dogs, etc.
So, post lots of stuff out there so when they search, they get so many results that they're not sure which one is you, which one isn't, etc.
That's your best bet, my friend.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30406330</id>
	<title>how about the truth?</title>
	<author>lcall</author>
	<datestamp>1260523440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You could say something like this on your resume, down at the bottom, in small print:  "You may find in google something I did 15 years ago while young, for which I have made necessary life corrections.  I look forward to discussing my current character and qualifications with which I look forward to using to advance the interests of your company."  Then make sure you are so qualified that they *want* you.  Honesty, candor, and virtue may be the best answer in a world that is losing those qualities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could say something like this on your resume , down at the bottom , in small print : " You may find in google something I did 15 years ago while young , for which I have made necessary life corrections .
I look forward to discussing my current character and qualifications with which I look forward to using to advance the interests of your company .
" Then make sure you are so qualified that they * want * you .
Honesty , candor , and virtue may be the best answer in a world that is losing those qualities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could say something like this on your resume, down at the bottom, in small print:  "You may find in google something I did 15 years ago while young, for which I have made necessary life corrections.
I look forward to discussing my current character and qualifications with which I look forward to using to advance the interests of your company.
"  Then make sure you are so qualified that they *want* you.
Honesty, candor, and virtue may be the best answer in a world that is losing those qualities.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397100</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>z0idberg</author>
	<datestamp>1260452400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice site design, very original.</p><p>If you have any respect for your fellow castmembers you would take the 5 minutes to honour their requests. Ask them to give you the full path to the pictures in question and remove any reference to them. Literally 5 minutes work.</p><p>I hope anyone considering being a member of the cast does a quick google search first and finds your comments here, decides you are too much of an arsehole to be associated with and thinks better of it.<br>I hope they tell the organisers of the show that you are the reason they aren't doing it too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice site design , very original.If you have any respect for your fellow castmembers you would take the 5 minutes to honour their requests .
Ask them to give you the full path to the pictures in question and remove any reference to them .
Literally 5 minutes work.I hope anyone considering being a member of the cast does a quick google search first and finds your comments here , decides you are too much of an arsehole to be associated with and thinks better of it.I hope they tell the organisers of the show that you are the reason they are n't doing it too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice site design, very original.If you have any respect for your fellow castmembers you would take the 5 minutes to honour their requests.
Ask them to give you the full path to the pictures in question and remove any reference to them.
Literally 5 minutes work.I hope anyone considering being a member of the cast does a quick google search first and finds your comments here, decides you are too much of an arsehole to be associated with and thinks better of it.I hope they tell the organisers of the show that you are the reason they aren't doing it too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398256</id>
	<title>Bury it</title>
	<author>br00tus</author>
	<datestamp>1260464580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The first thing I would do is try to bury it.  Get your name out there on the Internet with lots of nice things attached.<p>
I have never written anything that can be used against me but idiots, who I don't even know, have, and have done so years ago.  Sometimes I have been successful having the content pulled but sometimes it is based in other countries.  Who knows how it has affected me - no one has ever mentioned it to me, but perhaps someone looking at my resume will see something they don't like and I don't get a call.</p><p>
So my name is on lists in lots of nice capacities - I patch some program, I help this or that project out.  If you can Google your name, and one of the first 50 responses is something bad about you, you're probably in trouble.  If a few of the first 50 are patches for some software, you helpfully answering someone's question etc., that is better.</p><p>
I've succeeded in removing my name from a few places, I suggest you being nice about it, and in some cases, dishonest about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first thing I would do is try to bury it .
Get your name out there on the Internet with lots of nice things attached .
I have never written anything that can be used against me but idiots , who I do n't even know , have , and have done so years ago .
Sometimes I have been successful having the content pulled but sometimes it is based in other countries .
Who knows how it has affected me - no one has ever mentioned it to me , but perhaps someone looking at my resume will see something they do n't like and I do n't get a call .
So my name is on lists in lots of nice capacities - I patch some program , I help this or that project out .
If you can Google your name , and one of the first 50 responses is something bad about you , you 're probably in trouble .
If a few of the first 50 are patches for some software , you helpfully answering someone 's question etc. , that is better .
I 've succeeded in removing my name from a few places , I suggest you being nice about it , and in some cases , dishonest about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first thing I would do is try to bury it.
Get your name out there on the Internet with lots of nice things attached.
I have never written anything that can be used against me but idiots, who I don't even know, have, and have done so years ago.
Sometimes I have been successful having the content pulled but sometimes it is based in other countries.
Who knows how it has affected me - no one has ever mentioned it to me, but perhaps someone looking at my resume will see something they don't like and I don't get a call.
So my name is on lists in lots of nice capacities - I patch some program, I help this or that project out.
If you can Google your name, and one of the first 50 responses is something bad about you, you're probably in trouble.
If a few of the first 50 are patches for some software, you helpfully answering someone's question etc., that is better.
I've succeeded in removing my name from a few places, I suggest you being nice about it, and in some cases, dishonest about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397994</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>MagusSlurpy</author>
	<datestamp>1260460200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you . .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.</p></div><p>Like your social security number and mother's maiden name.  Make sure to notify us all when you post it, too, so we can link it up for the Google hits.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you .
. .Like your social security number and mother 's maiden name .
Make sure to notify us all when you post it , too , so we can link it up for the Google hits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you .
. .Like your social security number and mother's maiden name.
Make sure to notify us all when you post it, too, so we can link it up for the Google hits.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395980</id>
	<title>McDonalds is always Hiring.</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1260446340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you can always get a job there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you can always get a job there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you can always get a job there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398764</id>
	<title>Negative disinformation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260472200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Post the same story all over the Internet using 10000 different names in place of your own. Have a few that replace the name with "a Nigerian businessman". Then, as others have said, start building a positive online persona discussing your involvement in flower arranging or some other non-computer related field.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Post the same story all over the Internet using 10000 different names in place of your own .
Have a few that replace the name with " a Nigerian businessman " .
Then , as others have said , start building a positive online persona discussing your involvement in flower arranging or some other non-computer related field .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Post the same story all over the Internet using 10000 different names in place of your own.
Have a few that replace the name with "a Nigerian businessman".
Then, as others have said, start building a positive online persona discussing your involvement in flower arranging or some other non-computer related field.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398370</id>
	<title>I know what you feel!</title>
	<author>Mephistro</author>
	<datestamp>1260466260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>
From what I remember of the TFA the only thing this guy did was giving references for another fella who in turn did something illegal.<p>

Yep! It's like not being able to sleep because a second cousin of your brother in law has posted the Internets full of pictures of himself screwing a goat,</p><p>
"That could ruin our family's reputation!" ^-^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From what I remember of the TFA the only thing this guy did was giving references for another fella who in turn did something illegal .
Yep ! It 's like not being able to sleep because a second cousin of your brother in law has posted the Internets full of pictures of himself screwing a goat , " That could ruin our family 's reputation !
" ^ - ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
From what I remember of the TFA the only thing this guy did was giving references for another fella who in turn did something illegal.
Yep! It's like not being able to sleep because a second cousin of your brother in law has posted the Internets full of pictures of himself screwing a goat,
"That could ruin our family's reputation!
" ^-^</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394944</id>
	<title>Similar story...</title>
	<author>NecroPuppy</author>
	<datestamp>1260442440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only it wasn't my youthful mistake.  Someone else caused the Secret Service to come look at some systems on my campus; one of which I was connected to when the incident occurred.</p><p>Many employers will be reasonable about it, especially if no charges were filed.  Those that won't, you probably don't want to work for anyway.</p><p>I will note that even having this Secret Service record didn't stop me from getting hired by a Federal Government Agency.  It just took an extra three weeks for all the additional paperwork.</p><p>(Though, to be fair, if a prospective employer searched on my name, they're going to get more links about an Honor Harrington character than the real me.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only it was n't my youthful mistake .
Someone else caused the Secret Service to come look at some systems on my campus ; one of which I was connected to when the incident occurred.Many employers will be reasonable about it , especially if no charges were filed .
Those that wo n't , you probably do n't want to work for anyway.I will note that even having this Secret Service record did n't stop me from getting hired by a Federal Government Agency .
It just took an extra three weeks for all the additional paperwork .
( Though , to be fair , if a prospective employer searched on my name , they 're going to get more links about an Honor Harrington character than the real me .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only it wasn't my youthful mistake.
Someone else caused the Secret Service to come look at some systems on my campus; one of which I was connected to when the incident occurred.Many employers will be reasonable about it, especially if no charges were filed.
Those that won't, you probably don't want to work for anyway.I will note that even having this Secret Service record didn't stop me from getting hired by a Federal Government Agency.
It just took an extra three weeks for all the additional paperwork.
(Though, to be fair, if a prospective employer searched on my name, they're going to get more links about an Honor Harrington character than the real me.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400264</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>RockDoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1260537960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Become an active participant on multiple forums, everything from albacore tuna fishing to zoology (avoid politics and religion).</p></div></blockquote><p>But<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... the politics of tuna fishing is horrendously complex (it's tied up with multi-national disputes over borders in the sea, the distressing habit that fish have of not carrying passports and of bypassing passport-control, the fish are probably suffering from range changes consequent on global warming, and their fishing is tied up with organised crime - i.e. local politics)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... while zoology, being founded on evolution, is interpreted in some religions as an assault on their brand of delusional approach to reality.</p><p>Become a sports commentator - it's slightly less inflammatory.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Become an active participant on multiple forums , everything from albacore tuna fishing to zoology ( avoid politics and religion ) .But ... the politics of tuna fishing is horrendously complex ( it 's tied up with multi-national disputes over borders in the sea , the distressing habit that fish have of not carrying passports and of bypassing passport-control , the fish are probably suffering from range changes consequent on global warming , and their fishing is tied up with organised crime - i.e .
local politics ) ... while zoology , being founded on evolution , is interpreted in some religions as an assault on their brand of delusional approach to reality.Become a sports commentator - it 's slightly less inflammatory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Become an active participant on multiple forums, everything from albacore tuna fishing to zoology (avoid politics and religion).But ... the politics of tuna fishing is horrendously complex (it's tied up with multi-national disputes over borders in the sea, the distressing habit that fish have of not carrying passports and of bypassing passport-control, the fish are probably suffering from range changes consequent on global warming, and their fishing is tied up with organised crime - i.e.
local politics) ... while zoology, being founded on evolution, is interpreted in some religions as an assault on their brand of delusional approach to reality.Become a sports commentator - it's slightly less inflammatory.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394510</id>
	<title>Re:Not keeping low profile?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sucks when you are held responsible for your actions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sucks when you are held responsible for your actions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sucks when you are held responsible for your actions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397630</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260457020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You could figure out how to remove pee from a pool, then use the same method to remove information from the internet!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could figure out how to remove pee from a pool , then use the same method to remove information from the internet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could figure out how to remove pee from a pool, then use the same method to remove information from the internet!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394836</id>
	<title>"Solution"</title>
	<author>operagost</author>
	<datestamp>1260442080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kick your "friend" in the junk for using your real name.  It won't solve anything, but you'll feel better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kick your " friend " in the junk for using your real name .
It wo n't solve anything , but you 'll feel better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kick your "friend" in the junk for using your real name.
It won't solve anything, but you'll feel better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402524</id>
	<title>Re:How common is your name?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260550560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My name is Paul Smith.. If you can identity which Paul Smith I am out of the numerous others in the world..<br>Then I will tell you how to clear your name on the web.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My name is Paul Smith.. If you can identity which Paul Smith I am out of the numerous others in the world..Then I will tell you how to clear your name on the web .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My name is Paul Smith.. If you can identity which Paul Smith I am out of the numerous others in the world..Then I will tell you how to clear your name on the web.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394902</id>
	<title>Change your name legally</title>
	<author>WillAffleckUW</author>
	<datestamp>1260442260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or become a Republican</p><p>Either one will work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or become a RepublicanEither one will work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or become a RepublicanEither one will work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402270</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1260549300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant."</p><p>Bullshit.<br>Fraud, theft, sexual assault etc come to mind as examples why that is a bad idea.</p><p>A business doesn't belong to the employees.<br>I don't care about trivia, but I'd do a thorough background check on any employee because any business I own<br>is my responsibility and that means running a tight ship.</p><p>No likee? Become self-employed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant .
" Bullshit.Fraud , theft , sexual assault etc come to mind as examples why that is a bad idea.A business does n't belong to the employees.I do n't care about trivia , but I 'd do a thorough background check on any employee because any business I ownis my responsibility and that means running a tight ship.No likee ?
Become self-employed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.
"Bullshit.Fraud, theft, sexual assault etc come to mind as examples why that is a bad idea.A business doesn't belong to the employees.I don't care about trivia, but I'd do a thorough background check on any employee because any business I ownis my responsibility and that means running a tight ship.No likee?
Become self-employed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395298</id>
	<title>Change your name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260443820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Change your name to Tigers Wood.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Change your name to Tigers Wood .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Change your name to Tigers Wood.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395858</id>
	<title>Honesty is the best policy.</title>
	<author>Ectospheno</author>
	<datestamp>1260445860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it happened 15 years ago and you weren't even charged with a crime then you are thinking this is more of a problem than it really is. People who have actually committed crimes manage to get security clearances as long as you are honest about what happened. If it was just an arrest they don't require you even mention it at all past 10 years. And that's for a top secret clearance, much less a job.</p><p>Be honest and show you've grown up and people won't care.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it happened 15 years ago and you were n't even charged with a crime then you are thinking this is more of a problem than it really is .
People who have actually committed crimes manage to get security clearances as long as you are honest about what happened .
If it was just an arrest they do n't require you even mention it at all past 10 years .
And that 's for a top secret clearance , much less a job.Be honest and show you 've grown up and people wo n't care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it happened 15 years ago and you weren't even charged with a crime then you are thinking this is more of a problem than it really is.
People who have actually committed crimes manage to get security clearances as long as you are honest about what happened.
If it was just an arrest they don't require you even mention it at all past 10 years.
And that's for a top secret clearance, much less a job.Be honest and show you've grown up and people won't care.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395192</id>
	<title>How Smar Are Your Future Employers?</title>
	<author>smitty777</author>
	<datestamp>1260443460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are so many info sources out there right now.  Posting embarrassing pictures of yourself on Facebook is one thing, but do you think your future employer will really be able to find the information on you, and really tell it's you?  It might be that they won't even be able to find the info on you, and will probably not connect the dots if they do. <br>
&nbsp; <br>
&nbsp; I would go to the interviews and wait to see if they bring it up.  You may want to go to an interview you don't care about first just to see how much damage control you actually have to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are so many info sources out there right now .
Posting embarrassing pictures of yourself on Facebook is one thing , but do you think your future employer will really be able to find the information on you , and really tell it 's you ?
It might be that they wo n't even be able to find the info on you , and will probably not connect the dots if they do .
    I would go to the interviews and wait to see if they bring it up .
You may want to go to an interview you do n't care about first just to see how much damage control you actually have to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are so many info sources out there right now.
Posting embarrassing pictures of yourself on Facebook is one thing, but do you think your future employer will really be able to find the information on you, and really tell it's you?
It might be that they won't even be able to find the info on you, and will probably not connect the dots if they do.
  
  I would go to the interviews and wait to see if they bring it up.
You may want to go to an interview you don't care about first just to see how much damage control you actually have to do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395168</id>
	<title>Who ya going to call...</title>
	<author>horza</author>
	<datestamp>1260443340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Join Scientology. Then claim the files were posted online as a falsified attack by somebody that disagrees with your religious beliefs. The web site will be shut down in no time.</p><p>Phillip.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Join Scientology .
Then claim the files were posted online as a falsified attack by somebody that disagrees with your religious beliefs .
The web site will be shut down in no time.Phillip .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Join Scientology.
Then claim the files were posted online as a falsified attack by somebody that disagrees with your religious beliefs.
The web site will be shut down in no time.Phillip.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402854</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Minwee</author>
	<datestamp>1260551940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>bury it with new content with your name. nobody looks past the first few pages of a search.</p></div></blockquote><p> <a href="http://www.threepanelsoul.com/view.php?date=2009-08-17" title="threepanelsoul.com">Or hire somebody to do it for you</a> [threepanelsoul.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>bury it with new content with your name .
nobody looks past the first few pages of a search .
Or hire somebody to do it for you [ threepanelsoul.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bury it with new content with your name.
nobody looks past the first few pages of a search.
Or hire somebody to do it for you [threepanelsoul.com].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398118</id>
	<title>Bury it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260462120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Create so much other stuff about yourself that the bad stuff is buried deeply enough that people won't bother.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Create so much other stuff about yourself that the bad stuff is buried deeply enough that people wo n't bother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Create so much other stuff about yourself that the bad stuff is buried deeply enough that people won't bother.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400114</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Sooner Boomer</author>
	<datestamp>1260535980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Yeah , but if we had taken GWB actions more seriously when he was younger and at his last few jobs then we could have saved ourselves a world of hurt.</p></div></blockquote><p>Yeah, just like Obama's past actions and past associations are now catching up to <i> <b>him</b> </i> after he's cost us trillions of dollars and millions of jobs!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but if we had taken GWB actions more seriously when he was younger and at his last few jobs then we could have saved ourselves a world of hurt.Yeah , just like Obama 's past actions and past associations are now catching up to him after he 's cost us trillions of dollars and millions of jobs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah , but if we had taken GWB actions more seriously when he was younger and at his last few jobs then we could have saved ourselves a world of hurt.Yeah, just like Obama's past actions and past associations are now catching up to  him  after he's cost us trillions of dollars and millions of jobs!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394690</id>
	<title>Re:What's in a name?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, then you are lying to a potential employer, which you could later get fired for.</p><p>Just laugh and say "I get that all the time."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , then you are lying to a potential employer , which you could later get fired for.Just laugh and say " I get that all the time .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, then you are lying to a potential employer, which you could later get fired for.Just laugh and say "I get that all the time.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396552</id>
	<title>Plausable deniability</title>
	<author>Mr. Freeman</author>
	<datestamp>1260448920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If your employer asks you about this then deny everything.<br>Like you said, you have no criminal record, you never had any charges filed, and you weren't involved with the making or distribution of this magazine.  Tell your employer you have no idea what the zine is talking about.  You've never seen it before and it has nothing to do with you.<br>Interviewer: "We found this online."<br>You: "Hmmm?  What is this?  Wow, that's interesting, I've never seen that before.  No idea what this is talking about, must be another guy with a similar name.  Well, whatever, what other questions did you have for me?"<br><br>If he presses the matter then simply say that you have no idea what the paper is on about and that if he has any doubts then he should go re-run your background check.  Even if your name is unusual, your clean background check should be a pretty damn good way to "prove" that you've never done anything illegal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If your employer asks you about this then deny everything.Like you said , you have no criminal record , you never had any charges filed , and you were n't involved with the making or distribution of this magazine .
Tell your employer you have no idea what the zine is talking about .
You 've never seen it before and it has nothing to do with you.Interviewer : " We found this online .
" You : " Hmmm ?
What is this ?
Wow , that 's interesting , I 've never seen that before .
No idea what this is talking about , must be another guy with a similar name .
Well , whatever , what other questions did you have for me ?
" If he presses the matter then simply say that you have no idea what the paper is on about and that if he has any doubts then he should go re-run your background check .
Even if your name is unusual , your clean background check should be a pretty damn good way to " prove " that you 've never done anything illegal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If your employer asks you about this then deny everything.Like you said, you have no criminal record, you never had any charges filed, and you weren't involved with the making or distribution of this magazine.
Tell your employer you have no idea what the zine is talking about.
You've never seen it before and it has nothing to do with you.Interviewer: "We found this online.
"You: "Hmmm?
What is this?
Wow, that's interesting, I've never seen that before.
No idea what this is talking about, must be another guy with a similar name.
Well, whatever, what other questions did you have for me?
"If he presses the matter then simply say that you have no idea what the paper is on about and that if he has any doubts then he should go re-run your background check.
Even if your name is unusual, your clean background check should be a pretty damn good way to "prove" that you've never done anything illegal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394960</id>
	<title>Depends</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260442500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It has little or nothing to do with "society".</p><p>Did you rape and murder my sister while burglarizing her house 15 years ago?</p><p>If you did, and you get out of jail, I am going to cut your nuts off, first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It has little or nothing to do with " society " .Did you rape and murder my sister while burglarizing her house 15 years ago ? If you did , and you get out of jail , I am going to cut your nuts off , first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has little or nothing to do with "society".Did you rape and murder my sister while burglarizing her house 15 years ago?If you did, and you get out of jail, I am going to cut your nuts off, first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394560</id>
	<title>Well first...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First[1], you need to invent a time machine.  Then you travel back in time and either convince your former self not to do it or you kill all the witnesses and destroy all the evidence.</p><p>[1] You can actually do it last, if you like.  Or in the middle.  Whenever.  It is a time machine, after[2] all.<br>[2] Or before all.  It is a time machine, after[3] all.<br>[3] Or before all.  It is <tt>stack overflow near line 5.  Bailing</tt></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First [ 1 ] , you need to invent a time machine .
Then you travel back in time and either convince your former self not to do it or you kill all the witnesses and destroy all the evidence .
[ 1 ] You can actually do it last , if you like .
Or in the middle .
Whenever. It is a time machine , after [ 2 ] all .
[ 2 ] Or before all .
It is a time machine , after [ 3 ] all .
[ 3 ] Or before all .
It is stack overflow near line 5 .
Bailing</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First[1], you need to invent a time machine.
Then you travel back in time and either convince your former self not to do it or you kill all the witnesses and destroy all the evidence.
[1] You can actually do it last, if you like.
Or in the middle.
Whenever.  It is a time machine, after[2] all.
[2] Or before all.
It is a time machine, after[3] all.
[3] Or before all.
It is stack overflow near line 5.
Bailing</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395788</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260445560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just leave it to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. to figure out the guy's name and make his problems even worse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just leave it to / .
to figure out the guy 's name and make his problems even worse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just leave it to /.
to figure out the guy's name and make his problems even worse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395516</id>
	<title>It Will Stick</title>
	<author>b4upoo</author>
	<datestamp>1260444540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>         I seriously doubt that you can get that information to vanish or be unavailable for anyone looking for it.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; However I seriously also doubt that many employers or anyone else will have much of a problem with it at all.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; It is rather like the new car buyer worrying about a ding or two on their credit rating. They usually fail to appreciate that the last<br>1000 buyers had worse credit than theirs. Employers who dig deep may find that in fact you are the cleanest applicant they have had all year. Others may care less simply because the reality is that all they care about is making money of of their job-slave-employees.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I suggest that you not be vain but let any prospective employer know that you are a good catch indeed and they are lucky that you applied for a job with them. If they have so many applicants that you are simply one of the vast horde then you need to be in another trade anyway as the value of the job will be starvation level wages with no real hope of growth for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I seriously doubt that you can get that information to vanish or be unavailable for anyone looking for it .
                  However I seriously also doubt that many employers or anyone else will have much of a problem with it at all .
                  It is rather like the new car buyer worrying about a ding or two on their credit rating .
They usually fail to appreciate that the last1000 buyers had worse credit than theirs .
Employers who dig deep may find that in fact you are the cleanest applicant they have had all year .
Others may care less simply because the reality is that all they care about is making money of of their job-slave-employees .
                  I suggest that you not be vain but let any prospective employer know that you are a good catch indeed and they are lucky that you applied for a job with them .
If they have so many applicants that you are simply one of the vast horde then you need to be in another trade anyway as the value of the job will be starvation level wages with no real hope of growth for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>         I seriously doubt that you can get that information to vanish or be unavailable for anyone looking for it.
                  However I seriously also doubt that many employers or anyone else will have much of a problem with it at all.
                  It is rather like the new car buyer worrying about a ding or two on their credit rating.
They usually fail to appreciate that the last1000 buyers had worse credit than theirs.
Employers who dig deep may find that in fact you are the cleanest applicant they have had all year.
Others may care less simply because the reality is that all they care about is making money of of their job-slave-employees.
                  I suggest that you not be vain but let any prospective employer know that you are a good catch indeed and they are lucky that you applied for a job with them.
If they have so many applicants that you are simply one of the vast horde then you need to be in another trade anyway as the value of the job will be starvation level wages with no real hope of growth for you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395448</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260444300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I find it funny that you are using a quote from Harlan Ellison that you saw on Sci Fi channel to back up an old truism. What do they teach today's kids? Have you no culture?<blockquote><div><p>Do I contradict myself?
        Very well then I contradict myself,
        (I am large, I contain multitudes.)</p></div></blockquote><p>
-- Walt Whitman <i>Song of Myself</i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I find it funny that you are using a quote from Harlan Ellison that you saw on Sci Fi channel to back up an old truism .
What do they teach today 's kids ?
Have you no culture ? Do I contradict myself ?
Very well then I contradict myself , ( I am large , I contain multitudes .
) -- Walt Whitman Song of Myself</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find it funny that you are using a quote from Harlan Ellison that you saw on Sci Fi channel to back up an old truism.
What do they teach today's kids?
Have you no culture?Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself,
        (I am large, I contain multitudes.
)
-- Walt Whitman Song of Myself
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395280</id>
	<title>Re:A good way to lower your profile</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1260443760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rummage away dude:</p><p><a href="http://www.textfiles.com/magazines/" title="textfiles.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.textfiles.com/magazines/</a> [textfiles.com]</p><p>The quality of the content is right up there with 4chan too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rummage away dude : http : //www.textfiles.com/magazines/ [ textfiles.com ] The quality of the content is right up there with 4chan too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rummage away dude:http://www.textfiles.com/magazines/ [textfiles.com]The quality of the content is right up there with 4chan too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395816</id>
	<title>Re:you bet I've had similar concerns</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1260445680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is nothing you can do to gfte rid of it.<br>Too bad, so sad.</p><p>Anyone who takes google response seriously is an idiot.</p><p>"Due to the nature of my work, I'm very confident this has in fact impacted my career."<br>Doubtful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is nothing you can do to gfte rid of it.Too bad , so sad.Anyone who takes google response seriously is an idiot .
" Due to the nature of my work , I 'm very confident this has in fact impacted my career .
" Doubtful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is nothing you can do to gfte rid of it.Too bad, so sad.Anyone who takes google response seriously is an idiot.
"Due to the nature of my work, I'm very confident this has in fact impacted my career.
"Doubtful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396126</id>
	<title>Is that you, 4chan?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260446880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>4chan in my slashdot? it's more likely than you think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>4chan in my slashdot ?
it 's more likely than you think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4chan in my slashdot?
it's more likely than you think.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399812</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260532080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's like peeing in the swimming pool: once it's in there, no way to get it out again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like peeing in the swimming pool : once it 's in there , no way to get it out again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like peeing in the swimming pool: once it's in there, no way to get it out again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397194</id>
	<title>Ooops, your brothers can't see you.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260453180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This country (USA) calls itself Christian?  So much for forgiveness.  Guess that's God's responsibility, huh?  Oh well.  Action, reaction.  Guess you're fried.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This country ( USA ) calls itself Christian ?
So much for forgiveness .
Guess that 's God 's responsibility , huh ?
Oh well .
Action , reaction .
Guess you 're fried .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This country (USA) calls itself Christian?
So much for forgiveness.
Guess that's God's responsibility, huh?
Oh well.
Action, reaction.
Guess you're fried.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395366</id>
	<title>Re:you bet I've had similar concerns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260444060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're lucky the forum has a 'reset password' feature that emails a new password to you.  If the email address is still there, the email will go to you; you can then change the account to use some other email address, and eventually that will propagate to Google.  Bonus effect: the ass who used your account will lose his access.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're lucky the forum has a 'reset password ' feature that emails a new password to you .
If the email address is still there , the email will go to you ; you can then change the account to use some other email address , and eventually that will propagate to Google .
Bonus effect : the ass who used your account will lose his access .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're lucky the forum has a 'reset password' feature that emails a new password to you.
If the email address is still there, the email will go to you; you can then change the account to use some other email address, and eventually that will propagate to Google.
Bonus effect: the ass who used your account will lose his access.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394676</id>
	<title>Keeping a low profile might have been the wrong</title>
	<author>tbf</author>
	<datestamp>1260441600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I've generally tried to keep a low profile online and until recently there's been very little information about me available from the major search engines.</p><p>And that's exactly the mistake you made, probably. Instead of keeping low profile you probably should have filled the web with positive information. This would have had two effects:</p><p>- people finding your youth mistake could contrast it with more recent contributions<br>- your positive contributions would have pushed your youth mistake to page 100 or something in search engines</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I 've generally tried to keep a low profile online and until recently there 's been very little information about me available from the major search engines.And that 's exactly the mistake you made , probably .
Instead of keeping low profile you probably should have filled the web with positive information .
This would have had two effects : - people finding your youth mistake could contrast it with more recent contributions- your positive contributions would have pushed your youth mistake to page 100 or something in search engines</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I've generally tried to keep a low profile online and until recently there's been very little information about me available from the major search engines.And that's exactly the mistake you made, probably.
Instead of keeping low profile you probably should have filled the web with positive information.
This would have had two effects:- people finding your youth mistake could contrast it with more recent contributions- your positive contributions would have pushed your youth mistake to page 100 or something in search engines</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394452</id>
	<title>Clear of what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260440820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And what did you do?</p><p>(cap ensnare)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And what did you do ?
( cap ensnare )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And what did you do?
(cap ensnare)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394878</id>
	<title>Re:Live With It</title>
	<author>daveime</author>
	<datestamp>1260442200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think Michael Myers, Jason Voorhees and Freddy Kreuger might all disagree with you there.</p><p>Depends what it is that he did, and despite my curiosity, I can't be bothered reading the whole of textfiles to find out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Michael Myers , Jason Voorhees and Freddy Kreuger might all disagree with you there.Depends what it is that he did , and despite my curiosity , I ca n't be bothered reading the whole of textfiles to find out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Michael Myers, Jason Voorhees and Freddy Kreuger might all disagree with you there.Depends what it is that he did, and despite my curiosity, I can't be bothered reading the whole of textfiles to find out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399410</id>
	<title>Re:How common is your name?</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1260525840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This was at uni. Degree from the same place that this happened? Quite a coincidence, that...</htmltext>
<tokenext>This was at uni .
Degree from the same place that this happened ?
Quite a coincidence , that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was at uni.
Degree from the same place that this happened?
Quite a coincidence, that...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395604</id>
	<title>Think outside the box</title>
	<author>GodfatherofSoul</author>
	<datestamp>1260444900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Instead of having no internet profile, have a very active internet profile.  You'll probably flood Google with references to yourself that wil obfuscate any searches for your name and your past, Mr. ZeroCool.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of having no internet profile , have a very active internet profile .
You 'll probably flood Google with references to yourself that wil obfuscate any searches for your name and your past , Mr. ZeroCool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of having no internet profile, have a very active internet profile.
You'll probably flood Google with references to yourself that wil obfuscate any searches for your name and your past, Mr. ZeroCool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395184</id>
	<title>You think you've got it bad</title>
	<author>presidenteloco</author>
	<datestamp>1260443400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've got a well-published racist neo-nazi with the same name as me.</p><p>Life basically sucks, in some ways.</p><p>Get over it and get on with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got a well-published racist neo-nazi with the same name as me.Life basically sucks , in some ways.Get over it and get on with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got a well-published racist neo-nazi with the same name as me.Life basically sucks, in some ways.Get over it and get on with it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397086</id>
	<title>Re:Live with it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260452340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just live with it. A reasonable person can see the difference between a simple mistake years ago (especially if there is no conviction) and a habitual law breaker. I sold alcohol to a minor because I was too lazy to check an ID, and it turned out to be a sting. It didn't ruin my life.</p></div><p>Now I'm an alcoholic you bastaaaaard!!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just live with it .
A reasonable person can see the difference between a simple mistake years ago ( especially if there is no conviction ) and a habitual law breaker .
I sold alcohol to a minor because I was too lazy to check an ID , and it turned out to be a sting .
It did n't ruin my life.Now I 'm an alcoholic you bastaaaaard ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just live with it.
A reasonable person can see the difference between a simple mistake years ago (especially if there is no conviction) and a habitual law breaker.
I sold alcohol to a minor because I was too lazy to check an ID, and it turned out to be a sting.
It didn't ruin my life.Now I'm an alcoholic you bastaaaaard!!
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1260441720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Society needs to wake-up and realize punishing someone for what they did 20 years ago is ridiculous.  Nobody is perfect.  It's like what Harlan Ellison said on Sci-Fi Channel: "People accuse me of contradicting myself because 30 years ago I said this or that.  And they're right.  That's because 30 years ago I was young and stupid, and now I'm older and wiser and changed my mind.  judge me on who I am today, now when I was some young brat."</p><p>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig.  Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.</p><p>Sorry for the typos - I'm typing on a mac.<br>I'm not usd to this keyboard'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Society needs to wake-up and realize punishing someone for what they did 20 years ago is ridiculous .
Nobody is perfect .
It 's like what Harlan Ellison said on Sci-Fi Channel : " People accuse me of contradicting myself because 30 years ago I said this or that .
And they 're right .
That 's because 30 years ago I was young and stupid , and now I 'm older and wiser and changed my mind .
judge me on who I am today , now when I was some young brat .
" IMHO just as thre 's a 7-year stature of limitations on law , so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig .
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.Sorry for the typos - I 'm typing on a mac.I 'm not usd to this keyboard'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Society needs to wake-up and realize punishing someone for what they did 20 years ago is ridiculous.
Nobody is perfect.
It's like what Harlan Ellison said on Sci-Fi Channel: "People accuse me of contradicting myself because 30 years ago I said this or that.
And they're right.
That's because 30 years ago I was young and stupid, and now I'm older and wiser and changed my mind.
judge me on who I am today, now when I was some young brat.
"IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig.
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.Sorry for the typos - I'm typing on a mac.I'm not usd to this keyboard'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394552</id>
	<title>Am I the only one..</title>
	<author>Ka D'Argo</author>
	<datestamp>1260441240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>curious as to what this guy did online 15 years ago that would both warrant a g-man visiting him and his need to have it removed from viewing online?</htmltext>
<tokenext>curious as to what this guy did online 15 years ago that would both warrant a g-man visiting him and his need to have it removed from viewing online ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>curious as to what this guy did online 15 years ago that would both warrant a g-man visiting him and his need to have it removed from viewing online?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30403024</id>
	<title>How will they know it is YOU who did that?</title>
	<author>t2000kw</author>
	<datestamp>1260552480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your name must be shared with quite a few other people in the world. You could say that there is information on the net about another person with the same name, or deny it in the same manner if it's pointed out to you. If my name were Michael Vick and someone mentioned what happened a few years ago, I would say that it wasn't the same Vick they read about. Unless there's a picture or something else relevant only to you in the information, you have a way out, unless the judgment is made without asking you first about it. There's no way around that last one unless you preemptively bring it up first, if you want to risk doing that. Or, you can tell the truth up front and see where it gets you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your name must be shared with quite a few other people in the world .
You could say that there is information on the net about another person with the same name , or deny it in the same manner if it 's pointed out to you .
If my name were Michael Vick and someone mentioned what happened a few years ago , I would say that it was n't the same Vick they read about .
Unless there 's a picture or something else relevant only to you in the information , you have a way out , unless the judgment is made without asking you first about it .
There 's no way around that last one unless you preemptively bring it up first , if you want to risk doing that .
Or , you can tell the truth up front and see where it gets you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your name must be shared with quite a few other people in the world.
You could say that there is information on the net about another person with the same name, or deny it in the same manner if it's pointed out to you.
If my name were Michael Vick and someone mentioned what happened a few years ago, I would say that it wasn't the same Vick they read about.
Unless there's a picture or something else relevant only to you in the information, you have a way out, unless the judgment is made without asking you first about it.
There's no way around that last one unless you preemptively bring it up first, if you want to risk doing that.
Or, you can tell the truth up front and see where it gets you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395638</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1260445080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Once its on the net, its on the net.</p></div><p>And as we all know, everything on the 'Net is true.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once its on the net , its on the net.And as we all know , everything on the 'Net is true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once its on the net, its on the net.And as we all know, everything on the 'Net is true.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396248</id>
	<title>get over it.  so what.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260447360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this is the biggest challenge in your life, be thankful.  Keep being thankful until you realize how unimportant it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this is the biggest challenge in your life , be thankful .
Keep being thankful until you realize how unimportant it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this is the biggest challenge in your life, be thankful.
Keep being thankful until you realize how unimportant it is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395142</id>
	<title>Re:How common is your name?</title>
	<author>gznork26</author>
	<datestamp>1260443280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm "Philip Zack", and as it happens a person with the same name was caught on video removing anthrax from a military base. Anyone who attempts to learn about me by googling my name will find lots of references to this other guy. I have no idea whether any of the jobs I didn't get were lost because an employer tried to do a quick and dirty background check, and didn't bother to ask whether what they found was me or not. Fortunately, the TSA didn't use google when I last flew, or I would have had a lengthy detour on the way to the aircraft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm " Philip Zack " , and as it happens a person with the same name was caught on video removing anthrax from a military base .
Anyone who attempts to learn about me by googling my name will find lots of references to this other guy .
I have no idea whether any of the jobs I did n't get were lost because an employer tried to do a quick and dirty background check , and did n't bother to ask whether what they found was me or not .
Fortunately , the TSA did n't use google when I last flew , or I would have had a lengthy detour on the way to the aircraft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm "Philip Zack", and as it happens a person with the same name was caught on video removing anthrax from a military base.
Anyone who attempts to learn about me by googling my name will find lots of references to this other guy.
I have no idea whether any of the jobs I didn't get were lost because an employer tried to do a quick and dirty background check, and didn't bother to ask whether what they found was me or not.
Fortunately, the TSA didn't use google when I last flew, or I would have had a lengthy detour on the way to the aircraft.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398026</id>
	<title>Get a new handle.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260460680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You need to change your name.</p><p>Someone should tell kids to use a cover name when they're going to commit stupid mistakes as a youth.  That way, when they start getting spammed later in life for s**t they did earlier, they can ditch the sullied handle, pick a new one, and move on.</p><p>When there's going to be an electronic record of your deeds, kids need to be thinking ahead.  Just like a tattoo, that tweet, wave, email, or blog posting is likely to be more permanent than not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You need to change your name.Someone should tell kids to use a cover name when they 're going to commit stupid mistakes as a youth .
That way , when they start getting spammed later in life for s * * t they did earlier , they can ditch the sullied handle , pick a new one , and move on.When there 's going to be an electronic record of your deeds , kids need to be thinking ahead .
Just like a tattoo , that tweet , wave , email , or blog posting is likely to be more permanent than not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You need to change your name.Someone should tell kids to use a cover name when they're going to commit stupid mistakes as a youth.
That way, when they start getting spammed later in life for s**t they did earlier, they can ditch the sullied handle, pick a new one, and move on.When there's going to be an electronic record of your deeds, kids need to be thinking ahead.
Just like a tattoo, that tweet, wave, email, or blog posting is likely to be more permanent than not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395000</id>
	<title>Re:How common is your name?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260442740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that's funny - my last name IS Szczerbiak. That good ole Polish-Slovak heritage coming back to me.</p><p>On an off-topic note, It was something of a scandal when my Polish grandfather hooked up with my Slovak grandmother...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that 's funny - my last name IS Szczerbiak .
That good ole Polish-Slovak heritage coming back to me.On an off-topic note , It was something of a scandal when my Polish grandfather hooked up with my Slovak grandmother.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that's funny - my last name IS Szczerbiak.
That good ole Polish-Slovak heritage coming back to me.On an off-topic note, It was something of a scandal when my Polish grandfather hooked up with my Slovak grandmother...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395464</id>
	<title>Re:you bet I've had similar concerns</title>
	<author>Gribflex</author>
	<datestamp>1260444420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd speak to your Doctor. I imagine you can get a prescription that will be covered by your insurance. Way easier than 'a friend of a friend' trying to find illegal ways of getting it under your name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd speak to your Doctor .
I imagine you can get a prescription that will be covered by your insurance .
Way easier than 'a friend of a friend ' trying to find illegal ways of getting it under your name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd speak to your Doctor.
I imagine you can get a prescription that will be covered by your insurance.
Way easier than 'a friend of a friend' trying to find illegal ways of getting it under your name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395216</id>
	<title>People are lazy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260443520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They will only check the first few pages of the search results. Just do many favorable things and put your name on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They will only check the first few pages of the search results .
Just do many favorable things and put your name on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They will only check the first few pages of the search results.
Just do many favorable things and put your name on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399488</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>sinbadfury</author>
	<datestamp>1260527100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The thing is it's part of history and that can't be changed. If a company goes to that much effort to pull up that sort of past info as part of their profiling of job candidates then a) you'll probably never get far enough in any hiring process to be told why you weren't successful and b) if you were be told that was the reason why you were not getting the job I'm sure they would know that they could be in legal hot water over possible descrimination based on the information being outside some window of relevancy etc and c) if they were discriminating against you they are not going to tell you.

So best thing to do is forget the past, it can't be changed, don't worry about the future, we have no way of telling whats coming and just focus on today, your health and your family. The right job will come your way, when it comes your way.

But in the end this is a lesson for all those young and dum script kiddies or boy genius' that think it would be fun to commit some possibly illegal computer activity for whatever reason, you prove that it is never truly forgotten and will be baggage you will always carry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is it 's part of history and that ca n't be changed .
If a company goes to that much effort to pull up that sort of past info as part of their profiling of job candidates then a ) you 'll probably never get far enough in any hiring process to be told why you were n't successful and b ) if you were be told that was the reason why you were not getting the job I 'm sure they would know that they could be in legal hot water over possible descrimination based on the information being outside some window of relevancy etc and c ) if they were discriminating against you they are not going to tell you .
So best thing to do is forget the past , it ca n't be changed , do n't worry about the future , we have no way of telling whats coming and just focus on today , your health and your family .
The right job will come your way , when it comes your way .
But in the end this is a lesson for all those young and dum script kiddies or boy genius ' that think it would be fun to commit some possibly illegal computer activity for whatever reason , you prove that it is never truly forgotten and will be baggage you will always carry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is it's part of history and that can't be changed.
If a company goes to that much effort to pull up that sort of past info as part of their profiling of job candidates then a) you'll probably never get far enough in any hiring process to be told why you weren't successful and b) if you were be told that was the reason why you were not getting the job I'm sure they would know that they could be in legal hot water over possible descrimination based on the information being outside some window of relevancy etc and c) if they were discriminating against you they are not going to tell you.
So best thing to do is forget the past, it can't be changed, don't worry about the future, we have no way of telling whats coming and just focus on today, your health and your family.
The right job will come your way, when it comes your way.
But in the end this is a lesson for all those young and dum script kiddies or boy genius' that think it would be fun to commit some possibly illegal computer activity for whatever reason, you prove that it is never truly forgotten and will be baggage you will always carry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397044</id>
	<title>What would the Star Wars Kid do?</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1260452100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, let it go!  It just is what it is.  *I was young and dumb" works in a lot of situations and I'm sure this is one of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , let it go !
It just is what it is .
* I was young and dumb " works in a lot of situations and I 'm sure this is one of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, let it go!
It just is what it is.
*I was young and dumb" works in a lot of situations and I'm sure this is one of them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401730</id>
	<title>Re:Depends</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260546960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It has little or nothing to do with "society".</i></p><p><i><i><i>Did you rape and murder my sister while burglarizing her house 15 years ago?</i></i></i></p><p><i><i><i><i>Depends. Where did she live?</i></i></i></i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It has little or nothing to do with " society " .Did you rape and murder my sister while burglarizing her house 15 years ago ? Depends .
Where did she live ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has little or nothing to do with "society".Did you rape and murder my sister while burglarizing her house 15 years ago?Depends.
Where did she live?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394818</id>
	<title>White Noise</title>
	<author>nerd65536</author>
	<datestamp>1260442020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bury the text file in search engine results by having a larger on-line presence. Write a blog, submit posts everywhere. Drown it in noise.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bury the text file in search engine results by having a larger on-line presence .
Write a blog , submit posts everywhere .
Drown it in noise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bury the text file in search engine results by having a larger on-line presence.
Write a blog, submit posts everywhere.
Drown it in noise.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398190</id>
	<title>Be grateful!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260463620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That at least it's a text file, and not some video<br>of you getting fucked in the ass, as seems the custom<br>among the younger generation on the internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That at least it 's a text file , and not some videoof you getting fucked in the ass , as seems the customamong the younger generation on the internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That at least it's a text file, and not some videoof you getting fucked in the ass, as seems the customamong the younger generation on the internet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394894</id>
	<title>Re:Well first...</title>
	<author>jittles</author>
	<datestamp>1260442260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ahh I wish I hadn't just run out of mod points! There's a ton of funny comments in here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahh I wish I had n't just run out of mod points !
There 's a ton of funny comments in here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahh I wish I hadn't just run out of mod points!
There's a ton of funny comments in here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394784</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That doesn't mean you can't do what the PR agents do: generate higher-profile positive information. That makes it harder to encounter the negative stuff casually. It also changes the balance in the perception of the individual concerned if the negative stuff does also come to light.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That does n't mean you ca n't do what the PR agents do : generate higher-profile positive information .
That makes it harder to encounter the negative stuff casually .
It also changes the balance in the perception of the individual concerned if the negative stuff does also come to light .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That doesn't mean you can't do what the PR agents do: generate higher-profile positive information.
That makes it harder to encounter the negative stuff casually.
It also changes the balance in the perception of the individual concerned if the negative stuff does also come to light.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397468</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1260455580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The submitter says that no charges were pressed, charges were pressed against Jesse Hirsch. They were however later dropped.</p><p>The submitter says that he was interviewed by feds.  "52 division", who arrested Jesse Hirsch is a division of the Toronto Police.</p><p>The submitter says that he mentioned it to a friend, who went on to briefly mention it in a zine. The article you linked to is extensive and written in the first person.</p><p>So it's not a perfect match, and I wouldn't be surprised if the submitter was not entirely accurate. I don't think anything conclusive can be drawn here.  If it is Jesse Hirsch, I wouldn't worry too much about it.  Reading the file, it looks like a clear overreaction by the authorities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The submitter says that no charges were pressed , charges were pressed against Jesse Hirsch .
They were however later dropped.The submitter says that he was interviewed by feds .
" 52 division " , who arrested Jesse Hirsch is a division of the Toronto Police.The submitter says that he mentioned it to a friend , who went on to briefly mention it in a zine .
The article you linked to is extensive and written in the first person.So it 's not a perfect match , and I would n't be surprised if the submitter was not entirely accurate .
I do n't think anything conclusive can be drawn here .
If it is Jesse Hirsch , I would n't worry too much about it .
Reading the file , it looks like a clear overreaction by the authorities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The submitter says that no charges were pressed, charges were pressed against Jesse Hirsch.
They were however later dropped.The submitter says that he was interviewed by feds.
"52 division", who arrested Jesse Hirsch is a division of the Toronto Police.The submitter says that he mentioned it to a friend, who went on to briefly mention it in a zine.
The article you linked to is extensive and written in the first person.So it's not a perfect match, and I wouldn't be surprised if the submitter was not entirely accurate.
I don't think anything conclusive can be drawn here.
If it is Jesse Hirsch, I wouldn't worry too much about it.
Reading the file, it looks like a clear overreaction by the authorities.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396206</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260447180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah , but if we had taken GWB actions more seriously when he was younger and at his last few jobs then we could have saved ourselves a world of hurt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but if we had taken GWB actions more seriously when he was younger and at his last few jobs then we could have saved ourselves a world of hurt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah , but if we had taken GWB actions more seriously when he was younger and at his last few jobs then we could have saved ourselves a world of hurt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395034</id>
	<title>pizza?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260442860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>aw hell, did you fall for that shit with redford going out for pizza, too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>aw hell , did you fall for that shit with redford going out for pizza , too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>aw hell, did you fall for that shit with redford going out for pizza, too?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395498</id>
	<title>Own your Name</title>
	<author>BobReturns</author>
	<datestamp>1260444540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only way to deal with something like this is to drown it out. There are tonnes of people with my name online, some of whom I disapprove of. So what did I do? Registered my name as a URL, built a decent website and made sure that anyone searching for me found what I wanted them to see.
<br>
<br>
You can't control what other people post about you, but you can control what you put out there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only way to deal with something like this is to drown it out .
There are tonnes of people with my name online , some of whom I disapprove of .
So what did I do ?
Registered my name as a URL , built a decent website and made sure that anyone searching for me found what I wanted them to see .
You ca n't control what other people post about you , but you can control what you put out there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only way to deal with something like this is to drown it out.
There are tonnes of people with my name online, some of whom I disapprove of.
So what did I do?
Registered my name as a URL, built a decent website and made sure that anyone searching for me found what I wanted them to see.
You can't control what other people post about you, but you can control what you put out there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395712</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>yet-another-lobbyist</author>
	<datestamp>1260445320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suppose we are seeing the Streisand effect already... this is only getting worse!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose we are seeing the Streisand effect already... this is only getting worse !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose we are seeing the Streisand effect already... this is only getting worse!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396100</id>
	<title>Reverse Streisand Effect</title>
	<author>thisisauniqueid</author>
	<datestamp>1260446760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only way to fix problems like this is the Reverse Streisand Effect: flood the Internet with positive, high-profile and truthful information about yourself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only way to fix problems like this is the Reverse Streisand Effect : flood the Internet with positive , high-profile and truthful information about yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only way to fix problems like this is the Reverse Streisand Effect: flood the Internet with positive, high-profile and truthful information about yourself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401378</id>
	<title>Re:Live with it.</title>
	<author>EvilBudMan</author>
	<datestamp>1260545220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would ruin your life if you live where I do. In Virginia they can even look up how many traffic tickets you have had, credit check you (If your poor they will not hire you), and on and on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would ruin your life if you live where I do .
In Virginia they can even look up how many traffic tickets you have had , credit check you ( If your poor they will not hire you ) , and on and on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would ruin your life if you live where I do.
In Virginia they can even look up how many traffic tickets you have had, credit check you (If your poor they will not hire you), and on and on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394994</id>
	<title>Re:Well first...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260442680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If he had a time machine, he could go back and kill himself before he has a chance to commit the act in question.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If he had a time machine , he could go back and kill himself before he has a chance to commit the act in question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he had a time machine, he could go back and kill himself before he has a chance to commit the act in question.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399190</id>
	<title>There's a law for that</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1260522660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IANAL, but I'm pretty certain there is civil law that prohibits the disclosure of such information without benevolent intent.  If they published it to warn others of a realistic risk you currently pose, that would be justified.  But it sounds like they're just posting it as web fodder.</p><p>It's sort of like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortious\_interference" title="wikipedia.org">tortious interference</a> [wikipedia.org], but for that they would only be publishing the true information with the intent to mess your life up.  And it's not defamation, because it's true.  There is law in between those that should at least make it more of a pain in the ass for them to fight than to just take it down.  Something to do with revealing inflammatory information without just cause... man I wish I could remember.</p><p>Call a paralegal, they'll at least look it up without having to pay a retainer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IANAL , but I 'm pretty certain there is civil law that prohibits the disclosure of such information without benevolent intent .
If they published it to warn others of a realistic risk you currently pose , that would be justified .
But it sounds like they 're just posting it as web fodder.It 's sort of like tortious interference [ wikipedia.org ] , but for that they would only be publishing the true information with the intent to mess your life up .
And it 's not defamation , because it 's true .
There is law in between those that should at least make it more of a pain in the ass for them to fight than to just take it down .
Something to do with revealing inflammatory information without just cause... man I wish I could remember.Call a paralegal , they 'll at least look it up without having to pay a retainer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IANAL, but I'm pretty certain there is civil law that prohibits the disclosure of such information without benevolent intent.
If they published it to warn others of a realistic risk you currently pose, that would be justified.
But it sounds like they're just posting it as web fodder.It's sort of like tortious interference [wikipedia.org], but for that they would only be publishing the true information with the intent to mess your life up.
And it's not defamation, because it's true.
There is law in between those that should at least make it more of a pain in the ass for them to fight than to just take it down.
Something to do with revealing inflammatory information without just cause... man I wish I could remember.Call a paralegal, they'll at least look it up without having to pay a retainer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397592</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Ambitwistor</author>
	<datestamp>1260456660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It's like what Harlan Ellison said on Sci-Fi Channel: [...] judge me on who I am today"</i></p><p><i>An old brat?</i></p><p><i>(Sorry...  Harlan's got a bit of a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. um.. reputation.)</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like what Harlan Ellison said on Sci-Fi Channel : [ ... ] judge me on who I am today " An old brat ? ( Sorry.. .
Harlan 's got a bit of a .. um.. reputation .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like what Harlan Ellison said on Sci-Fi Channel: [...] judge me on who I am today"An old brat?(Sorry...
Harlan's got a bit of a .. um.. reputation.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401600</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Myopic</author>
	<datestamp>1260546300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure, but we'd also be avoiding just about every other of our Presidents too: GWB, Obama, Clinton, Bush 1, JFK, Lincoln...</p><p>There were lots and lots of great reasons not to elect GWB (which must be why we *didn't* elect him) but the specific shenanigans of his youth weren't enough all by themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , but we 'd also be avoiding just about every other of our Presidents too : GWB , Obama , Clinton , Bush 1 , JFK , Lincoln...There were lots and lots of great reasons not to elect GWB ( which must be why we * did n't * elect him ) but the specific shenanigans of his youth were n't enough all by themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, but we'd also be avoiding just about every other of our Presidents too: GWB, Obama, Clinton, Bush 1, JFK, Lincoln...There were lots and lots of great reasons not to elect GWB (which must be why we *didn't* elect him) but the specific shenanigans of his youth weren't enough all by themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401404</id>
	<title>Re:The best thing you can do is post on /.</title>
	<author>csartanis</author>
	<datestamp>1260545340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So has anyone found it yet?  Inquiring minds want to know!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So has anyone found it yet ?
Inquiring minds want to know !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So has anyone found it yet?
Inquiring minds want to know!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395232</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260443580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wow, you are a jerk</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wow , you are a jerk</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wow, you are a jerk</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396184</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260447060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly. A good employer will either ask or not care. If asked, explain it happened long time ago and you've changed since then. If they still care, maybe you're better off working elsewhere.</p><blockquote><div><p>Sorry for the typos - I'm typing on a mac.<br>
I'm not usd to this keyboard'</p></div></blockquote><p>Sorry, I've never used a mac. Is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. missing the preview button on mac? Or you can't read and correct what you type on mac?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
A good employer will either ask or not care .
If asked , explain it happened long time ago and you 've changed since then .
If they still care , maybe you 're better off working elsewhere.Sorry for the typos - I 'm typing on a mac .
I 'm not usd to this keyboard'Sorry , I 've never used a mac .
Is / .
missing the preview button on mac ?
Or you ca n't read and correct what you type on mac ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
A good employer will either ask or not care.
If asked, explain it happened long time ago and you've changed since then.
If they still care, maybe you're better off working elsewhere.Sorry for the typos - I'm typing on a mac.
I'm not usd to this keyboard'Sorry, I've never used a mac.
Is /.
missing the preview button on mac?
Or you can't read and correct what you type on mac?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394554</id>
	<title>Suggestion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just hack into the server hosting the offending item and... oh wait.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just hack into the server hosting the offending item and... oh wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just hack into the server hosting the offending item and... oh wait.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395868</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1260445920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig. Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.</p></div><p>- Hi I've got 30 years experience!</p><p>- Sorry, we can only look at the last 7.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>IMHO just as thre 's a 7-year stature of limitations on law , so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig .
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.- Hi I 've got 30 years experience ! - Sorry , we can only look at the last 7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig.
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.- Hi I've got 30 years experience!- Sorry, we can only look at the last 7.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394776</id>
	<title>Can't change the past, so talk about the future...</title>
	<author>GasparGMSwordsman</author>
	<datestamp>1260441900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your basically online with that story forever now.  Not much you can do about that.<br> <br>

Instead you could try to put more of you out there.  If this story is only one of a hundred and the others are more recent and show you in a better light then the old story will matter less.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your basically online with that story forever now .
Not much you can do about that .
Instead you could try to put more of you out there .
If this story is only one of a hundred and the others are more recent and show you in a better light then the old story will matter less .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your basically online with that story forever now.
Not much you can do about that.
Instead you could try to put more of you out there.
If this story is only one of a hundred and the others are more recent and show you in a better light then the old story will matter less.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400328</id>
	<title>Re:wtf kind of question is this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260538620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"You can be denied for ANY reason except race, religon, or sexual orientation and those are hard to prove."</p><p>You can be denied a job based on gender in the USA? o.O</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" You can be denied for ANY reason except race , religon , or sexual orientation and those are hard to prove .
" You can be denied a job based on gender in the USA ?
o.O</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You can be denied for ANY reason except race, religon, or sexual orientation and those are hard to prove.
"You can be denied a job based on gender in the USA?
o.O</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395612</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260444960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>yea, your an asshole.</htmltext>
<tokenext>yea , your an asshole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yea, your an asshole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398624</id>
	<title>Goddamn idiot.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260469980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey retard.</p><p>Ever tought about the sorry bastards who got the same name you do?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...ever tought how much problems you caused them for being an idiot?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...ever tought about shutting the fuck up and changing your name, because you are propably the sole reason your name has a bad name.</p><p>just for a second. try to imagine if your name would be unique.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...yes. i mean unique.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>now imagine if you really do have a problem. change your fcking name.</p><p>goddamnit.</p><p>get out of my slashdot!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey retard.Ever tought about the sorry bastards who got the same name you do ?
...ever tought how much problems you caused them for being an idiot ?
...ever tought about shutting the fuck up and changing your name , because you are propably the sole reason your name has a bad name.just for a second .
try to imagine if your name would be unique .
...yes. i mean unique .
...now imagine if you really do have a problem .
change your fcking name.goddamnit.get out of my slashdot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey retard.Ever tought about the sorry bastards who got the same name you do?
...ever tought how much problems you caused them for being an idiot?
...ever tought about shutting the fuck up and changing your name, because you are propably the sole reason your name has a bad name.just for a second.
try to imagine if your name would be unique.
...yes. i mean unique.
...now imagine if you really do have a problem.
change your fcking name.goddamnit.get out of my slashdot!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396348</id>
	<title>Security by Obscurity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260447840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>spam your name all over the net with good stuff about you, bury the indiscretion by working on the SEO of the newly written articles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>spam your name all over the net with good stuff about you , bury the indiscretion by working on the SEO of the newly written articles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>spam your name all over the net with good stuff about you, bury the indiscretion by working on the SEO of the newly written articles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396784</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260450360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>In Internet Explorer 6 you just click Tools &gt;&gt; Options and then Erase all Temporary files.<p>Then you'll want to unplug the phone line from your modem.  That way nobody can access your internet.  Problem solved!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Internet Explorer 6 you just click Tools &gt; &gt; Options and then Erase all Temporary files.Then you 'll want to unplug the phone line from your modem .
That way nobody can access your internet .
Problem solved !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Internet Explorer 6 you just click Tools &gt;&gt; Options and then Erase all Temporary files.Then you'll want to unplug the phone line from your modem.
That way nobody can access your internet.
Problem solved!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30446390</id>
	<title>Re:Not keeping low profile?</title>
	<author>gabec</author>
	<datestamp>1260900900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That made me think of an even better idea... astroturf yourself. "[Joe Skeleton] wins Nobel Peace Prize!" etc. Get enough out there--backdated even--and if anyone asks, just say you have some real prankster buddies.</p><p>Short of that though, your best bet really is to start putting your name out there for what you've done since. I've sort of had the opposite effect happen to me. For years just out of college I thought it was pretty rad to be findable online and worked to be every result on the first page (why... I don't know.) of Altavista (yeah, remember them?). Then after a while I changed my mind and started pulling things offline, which left only crap I couldn't erase myself. Now the first page results include only one item that's legitimately from me (not someone with my same name) and it's of me chewing out a guy on a mailing list. Thus my legacy is of being a douche to some random guy. =/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That made me think of an even better idea... astroturf yourself .
" [ Joe Skeleton ] wins Nobel Peace Prize !
" etc .
Get enough out there--backdated even--and if anyone asks , just say you have some real prankster buddies.Short of that though , your best bet really is to start putting your name out there for what you 've done since .
I 've sort of had the opposite effect happen to me .
For years just out of college I thought it was pretty rad to be findable online and worked to be every result on the first page ( why... I do n't know .
) of Altavista ( yeah , remember them ? ) .
Then after a while I changed my mind and started pulling things offline , which left only crap I could n't erase myself .
Now the first page results include only one item that 's legitimately from me ( not someone with my same name ) and it 's of me chewing out a guy on a mailing list .
Thus my legacy is of being a douche to some random guy .
= /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That made me think of an even better idea... astroturf yourself.
"[Joe Skeleton] wins Nobel Peace Prize!
" etc.
Get enough out there--backdated even--and if anyone asks, just say you have some real prankster buddies.Short of that though, your best bet really is to start putting your name out there for what you've done since.
I've sort of had the opposite effect happen to me.
For years just out of college I thought it was pretty rad to be findable online and worked to be every result on the first page (why... I don't know.
) of Altavista (yeah, remember them?).
Then after a while I changed my mind and started pulling things offline, which left only crap I couldn't erase myself.
Now the first page results include only one item that's legitimately from me (not someone with my same name) and it's of me chewing out a guy on a mailing list.
Thus my legacy is of being a douche to some random guy.
=/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446</id>
	<title>Use it in the interview..</title>
	<author>Manip</author>
	<datestamp>1260440820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you ever consider taking what you did and using it as a reason they SHOULD hire you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you ever consider taking what you did and using it as a reason they SHOULD hire you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you ever consider taking what you did and using it as a reason they SHOULD hire you?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399554</id>
	<title>Just out of interest...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260528060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you fold your underpants?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you fold your underpants ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you fold your underpants?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395796</id>
	<title>Solution</title>
	<author>thickdiick</author>
	<datestamp>1260445560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Change your name, even if only to an alternate spelling/</htmltext>
<tokenext>Change your name , even if only to an alternate spelling/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Change your name, even if only to an alternate spelling/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396176</id>
	<title>i'll do it for you</title>
	<author>Errtu76</author>
	<datestamp>1260447060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what's your name?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what 's your name ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what's your name?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30419362</id>
	<title>Re:How common is your name?</title>
	<author>PsyberS</author>
	<datestamp>1260634320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>3) Deny, deny, deny.  It's still a good option.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  If a prospective employer comes across it, laugh about it.  "Ya, I found my name, and saw what that other guy did.  It's funny, but no it's not me."</p></div><p>I generally agree with this statement, but do keep in mind that if you lie in an interview or on your job application this is typically grounds for dismissal (if/when they figure out its a lie).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>3 ) Deny , deny , deny .
It 's still a good option .
: ) If a prospective employer comes across it , laugh about it .
" Ya , I found my name , and saw what that other guy did .
It 's funny , but no it 's not me .
" I generally agree with this statement , but do keep in mind that if you lie in an interview or on your job application this is typically grounds for dismissal ( if/when they figure out its a lie ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3) Deny, deny, deny.
It's still a good option.
:)  If a prospective employer comes across it, laugh about it.
"Ya, I found my name, and saw what that other guy did.
It's funny, but no it's not me.
"I generally agree with this statement, but do keep in mind that if you lie in an interview or on your job application this is typically grounds for dismissal (if/when they figure out its a lie).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397798</id>
	<title>Re:Use it in the interview..</title>
	<author>Jazz-Masta</author>
	<datestamp>1260458280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>charge you with a crime for just having 'anarchy' files today.</p></div><p>I've always wondered what would happen today if I searched for the cookbook...would I get flagged...who knows. I remember 15 years ago the thing was practically a staple for all kids on the Internet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>charge you with a crime for just having 'anarchy ' files today.I 've always wondered what would happen today if I searched for the cookbook...would I get flagged...who knows .
I remember 15 years ago the thing was practically a staple for all kids on the Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>charge you with a crime for just having 'anarchy' files today.I've always wondered what would happen today if I searched for the cookbook...would I get flagged...who knows.
I remember 15 years ago the thing was practically a staple for all kids on the Internet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395976</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260446340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LOLOL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LOLOL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOLOL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396736</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>shentino</author>
	<datestamp>1260450060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The RIAA already has prior art on that.</p><p>They punish your pocketbook AND your ears!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The RIAA already has prior art on that.They punish your pocketbook AND your ears !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The RIAA already has prior art on that.They punish your pocketbook AND your ears!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396398</id>
	<title>Be up front</title>
	<author>zeil</author>
	<datestamp>1260448080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Print out the story, capture as many links to it as you can and have an explanation of what happened during an interview.  That is unless you were having peanut butter sex with your dog, after all its your dog, right?  If that's the case you really screwed the pouch.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Print out the story , capture as many links to it as you can and have an explanation of what happened during an interview .
That is unless you were having peanut butter sex with your dog , after all its your dog , right ?
If that 's the case you really screwed the pouch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Print out the story, capture as many links to it as you can and have an explanation of what happened during an interview.
That is unless you were having peanut butter sex with your dog, after all its your dog, right?
If that's the case you really screwed the pouch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398766</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>NickFortune</author>
	<datestamp>1260472320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>embrace it as a life lesson and show how you used the fallout from that event to learn to better take responsibility for your actions</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
That's the way to go, I'd have said. Mention it in your CV so everything's clear from the start. Some employers will be put off, but some are going to see it as evidence of talent. You can expect to get some searching questions about it at interviews<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but it's better than hiding it, and having it come up on Google anyway.
</p><p>
The "publish a huge volume of information" approach could help as well, although depending how widely the file in question gets mirrored, you may never be able to hide it among the good stuff. Still, it can't hurt your job prospects to have a large positive online presence.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>embrace it as a life lesson and show how you used the fallout from that event to learn to better take responsibility for your actions That 's the way to go , I 'd have said .
Mention it in your CV so everything 's clear from the start .
Some employers will be put off , but some are going to see it as evidence of talent .
You can expect to get some searching questions about it at interviews ... but it 's better than hiding it , and having it come up on Google anyway .
The " publish a huge volume of information " approach could help as well , although depending how widely the file in question gets mirrored , you may never be able to hide it among the good stuff .
Still , it ca n't hurt your job prospects to have a large positive online presence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>embrace it as a life lesson and show how you used the fallout from that event to learn to better take responsibility for your actions

That's the way to go, I'd have said.
Mention it in your CV so everything's clear from the start.
Some employers will be put off, but some are going to see it as evidence of talent.
You can expect to get some searching questions about it at interviews ... but it's better than hiding it, and having it come up on Google anyway.
The "publish a huge volume of information" approach could help as well, although depending how widely the file in question gets mirrored, you may never be able to hide it among the good stuff.
Still, it can't hurt your job prospects to have a large positive online presence.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398128</id>
	<title>Re:wtf kind of question is this?</title>
	<author>Eskarel</author>
	<datestamp>1260462360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not exactly true. There's far more employment rights in the US than you might think. It's a lot harder to prove prejudice, but if you can any number of things beyond race, religion, and sexual orientation are actually protected. Age, and gender are two big ones, and I'm fairly certain that in at least some states there is some protection for prejudice against someone with a criminal record, depending on the type of crime and the type of job.</p><p>You can't actually deny employment for <b>ANY</b> reason, you can however deny employment for no reason, which makes it seem like you can deny employment for any reason. It's somewhat hard to prove that you've been unjustly passed over or terminated when "because I felt like it is a valid reason. If however they felt like it because of your race, gender, sexual orientation, health status, or any of the hundred other reasons they aren't legally allowed to discriminate against you, and you can prove it, you can win your lawsuit.</p><p>Basically it's illegal to discriminate against people for all sorts of reasons. The only reason the ones you mentioned are the only ones which seem to be protected is they're a little easier to work with. If you can show that you and the person who got the job over you are equal, but you're black and he or she is white, you can probably convince a jury that it was race which caused the problem. Racism is fairly well known, and your race is pretty obvious so you don't have to prove they knew. For a lot of other things you'd have to prove they knew about it first, which is a little harder sometimes. Fire and hire at will don't actually mean what you think they mean. They come close in reality to that since "because I felt like it" is hard to disprove, but if you can prove otherwise you're in good shape.</p><p>That said, pretty much any country in the world would allow an employer to refuse to hire someone for an IT job who had been involved in computer related criminal activity in the past. The fact that this bloke commited felony electronic trespass would certainly be applicable to any applications he made for an IT admin, or network security job.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not exactly true .
There 's far more employment rights in the US than you might think .
It 's a lot harder to prove prejudice , but if you can any number of things beyond race , religion , and sexual orientation are actually protected .
Age , and gender are two big ones , and I 'm fairly certain that in at least some states there is some protection for prejudice against someone with a criminal record , depending on the type of crime and the type of job.You ca n't actually deny employment for ANY reason , you can however deny employment for no reason , which makes it seem like you can deny employment for any reason .
It 's somewhat hard to prove that you 've been unjustly passed over or terminated when " because I felt like it is a valid reason .
If however they felt like it because of your race , gender , sexual orientation , health status , or any of the hundred other reasons they are n't legally allowed to discriminate against you , and you can prove it , you can win your lawsuit.Basically it 's illegal to discriminate against people for all sorts of reasons .
The only reason the ones you mentioned are the only ones which seem to be protected is they 're a little easier to work with .
If you can show that you and the person who got the job over you are equal , but you 're black and he or she is white , you can probably convince a jury that it was race which caused the problem .
Racism is fairly well known , and your race is pretty obvious so you do n't have to prove they knew .
For a lot of other things you 'd have to prove they knew about it first , which is a little harder sometimes .
Fire and hire at will do n't actually mean what you think they mean .
They come close in reality to that since " because I felt like it " is hard to disprove , but if you can prove otherwise you 're in good shape.That said , pretty much any country in the world would allow an employer to refuse to hire someone for an IT job who had been involved in computer related criminal activity in the past .
The fact that this bloke commited felony electronic trespass would certainly be applicable to any applications he made for an IT admin , or network security job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not exactly true.
There's far more employment rights in the US than you might think.
It's a lot harder to prove prejudice, but if you can any number of things beyond race, religion, and sexual orientation are actually protected.
Age, and gender are two big ones, and I'm fairly certain that in at least some states there is some protection for prejudice against someone with a criminal record, depending on the type of crime and the type of job.You can't actually deny employment for ANY reason, you can however deny employment for no reason, which makes it seem like you can deny employment for any reason.
It's somewhat hard to prove that you've been unjustly passed over or terminated when "because I felt like it is a valid reason.
If however they felt like it because of your race, gender, sexual orientation, health status, or any of the hundred other reasons they aren't legally allowed to discriminate against you, and you can prove it, you can win your lawsuit.Basically it's illegal to discriminate against people for all sorts of reasons.
The only reason the ones you mentioned are the only ones which seem to be protected is they're a little easier to work with.
If you can show that you and the person who got the job over you are equal, but you're black and he or she is white, you can probably convince a jury that it was race which caused the problem.
Racism is fairly well known, and your race is pretty obvious so you don't have to prove they knew.
For a lot of other things you'd have to prove they knew about it first, which is a little harder sometimes.
Fire and hire at will don't actually mean what you think they mean.
They come close in reality to that since "because I felt like it" is hard to disprove, but if you can prove otherwise you're in good shape.That said, pretty much any country in the world would allow an employer to refuse to hire someone for an IT job who had been involved in computer related criminal activity in the past.
The fact that this bloke commited felony electronic trespass would certainly be applicable to any applications he made for an IT admin, or network security job.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30404316</id>
	<title>Piss in the pool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260557100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get the name of the relevant HR guy at the company in question.</p><p>Make a bunch of embarrassing posts in various places using the same name, but not pretending to be him, just someone with a similar name. Just screw up his own Google search results so he may get the idea that Googling someone's name generates more crap than useful information.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get the name of the relevant HR guy at the company in question.Make a bunch of embarrassing posts in various places using the same name , but not pretending to be him , just someone with a similar name .
Just screw up his own Google search results so he may get the idea that Googling someone 's name generates more crap than useful information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get the name of the relevant HR guy at the company in question.Make a bunch of embarrassing posts in various places using the same name, but not pretending to be him, just someone with a similar name.
Just screw up his own Google search results so he may get the idea that Googling someone's name generates more crap than useful information.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396942</id>
	<title>Name change</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260451380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Change your name. It's what the rest of us do. Anonymous Coward is working well for me!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Change your name .
It 's what the rest of us do .
Anonymous Coward is working well for me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Change your name.
It's what the rest of us do.
Anonymous Coward is working well for me!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396356</id>
	<title>If you're any good...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260447900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're any good at what you do, this won't be a problem. no one cares.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're any good at what you do , this wo n't be a problem .
no one cares .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're any good at what you do, this won't be a problem.
no one cares.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396380</id>
	<title>For chrissakes.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260448020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're THAT starved for attention you submit a story about yourself to Slashdot, faux complaining about being judged for once being a self-styled 00b3r 1337 h4x0r and then when nobody clamors for more info about your wonderful self, you actually go so far as to post a link to the very info you pretend to be concerned about people finding.</p><p>Is your facebook page not getting enough hits or something?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're THAT starved for attention you submit a story about yourself to Slashdot , faux complaining about being judged for once being a self-styled 00b3r 1337 h4x0r and then when nobody clamors for more info about your wonderful self , you actually go so far as to post a link to the very info you pretend to be concerned about people finding.Is your facebook page not getting enough hits or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're THAT starved for attention you submit a story about yourself to Slashdot, faux complaining about being judged for once being a self-styled 00b3r 1337 h4x0r and then when nobody clamors for more info about your wonderful self, you actually go so far as to post a link to the very info you pretend to be concerned about people finding.Is your facebook page not getting enough hits or something?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398964</id>
	<title>Re:Use it in the interview..</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1260562620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's exactly what he should do.  We can help with this, but we need to know more about it.</p><p>Please post exactly what you did, and your real name.  We'll sort it right out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's exactly what he should do .
We can help with this , but we need to know more about it.Please post exactly what you did , and your real name .
We 'll sort it right out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's exactly what he should do.
We can help with this, but we need to know more about it.Please post exactly what you did, and your real name.
We'll sort it right out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396280</id>
	<title>Re:Use it in the interview..</title>
	<author>JumpDrive</author>
	<datestamp>1260447540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And exactly who are you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And exactly who are you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And exactly who are you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394600</id>
	<title>Good idea</title>
	<author>MullerMn</author>
	<datestamp>1260441420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd DEFINITELY start by drawing everybody's attention to it online as much as possible. Perhaps by posting about it on one of the more widely read techie news sites?

Maybe a sort of reverse Streisand effect could be created.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd DEFINITELY start by drawing everybody 's attention to it online as much as possible .
Perhaps by posting about it on one of the more widely read techie news sites ?
Maybe a sort of reverse Streisand effect could be created .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd DEFINITELY start by drawing everybody's attention to it online as much as possible.
Perhaps by posting about it on one of the more widely read techie news sites?
Maybe a sort of reverse Streisand effect could be created.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397820</id>
	<title>Quickly..</title>
	<author>icepick72</author>
	<datestamp>1260458580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>..register more than 600 Slashdot accounts, keep using them until you get Moderator ability, then downvote EVERYTHING here to -1 as to not draw more attention to yourself online.</htmltext>
<tokenext>..register more than 600 Slashdot accounts , keep using them until you get Moderator ability , then downvote EVERYTHING here to -1 as to not draw more attention to yourself online .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..register more than 600 Slashdot accounts, keep using them until you get Moderator ability, then downvote EVERYTHING here to -1 as to not draw more attention to yourself online.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399142</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1260522000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You're using a mac? Well, good luck on getting hired by MS for the next 7 years.</p></div><p>Well, John Lam (the IronRuby guy) works for MS, and he recently <a href="http://www.iunknown.com/2009/12/motorola-droid-review.html" title="iunknown.com">switched from iPhone to Droid</a> [iunknown.com], and <a href="http://www.iunknown.com/2007/06/vmware\_fusion\_r.html" title="iunknown.com">runs Visual Studio in VMware Fusion on OS X</a> [iunknown.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're using a mac ?
Well , good luck on getting hired by MS for the next 7 years.Well , John Lam ( the IronRuby guy ) works for MS , and he recently switched from iPhone to Droid [ iunknown.com ] , and runs Visual Studio in VMware Fusion on OS X [ iunknown.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're using a mac?
Well, good luck on getting hired by MS for the next 7 years.Well, John Lam (the IronRuby guy) works for MS, and he recently switched from iPhone to Droid [iunknown.com], and runs Visual Studio in VMware Fusion on OS X [iunknown.com].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399808</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>Issarlk</author>
	<datestamp>1260531960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>How hard is it to simply remove people's name in the page text? Google doesn't (yet) do face recognition on photographs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How hard is it to simply remove people 's name in the page text ?
Google does n't ( yet ) do face recognition on photographs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How hard is it to simply remove people's name in the page text?
Google doesn't (yet) do face recognition on photographs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398076</id>
	<title>Give up and save your sanity.</title>
	<author>Lord Kano</author>
	<datestamp>1260461400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As Joe Rogan allegedly said trying to get something off of the internet is like trying to get the pee out of a pool.</p><p>I have personally mirrored textfiles.com and I can tell you right now that I'm not going to remove you from my archive. You will never be able to clean it off.</p><p>LK</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As Joe Rogan allegedly said trying to get something off of the internet is like trying to get the pee out of a pool.I have personally mirrored textfiles.com and I can tell you right now that I 'm not going to remove you from my archive .
You will never be able to clean it off.LK</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As Joe Rogan allegedly said trying to get something off of the internet is like trying to get the pee out of a pool.I have personally mirrored textfiles.com and I can tell you right now that I'm not going to remove you from my archive.
You will never be able to clean it off.LK</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399922</id>
	<title>Fill the net with noise</title>
	<author>slumpie</author>
	<datestamp>1260533580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe you can't remove some entries, but can be one within a large number of unuseful information. You can alse try to increase the number of references to information with positive vision about you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you ca n't remove some entries , but can be one within a large number of unuseful information .
You can alse try to increase the number of references to information with positive vision about you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you can't remove some entries, but can be one within a large number of unuseful information.
You can alse try to increase the number of references to information with positive vision about you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396042</id>
	<title>Re:And here's the payback coming to the Internet G</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260446580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You might want to try a suggestion from a previous poster: create a bunch of other 'fake' Erik Trimbles with obviously different profile information and randomly selected photos and the begin replying to lots of various blogs with those accounts and generally muddy the waters on Google for any Erik Trimble searches. This disinformation campaign could be as simple or elaborate as you like, but even a modest amount of effort here might pay some useful dividends by creating a few more targets for the amateur Google sleuths out there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You might want to try a suggestion from a previous poster : create a bunch of other 'fake ' Erik Trimbles with obviously different profile information and randomly selected photos and the begin replying to lots of various blogs with those accounts and generally muddy the waters on Google for any Erik Trimble searches .
This disinformation campaign could be as simple or elaborate as you like , but even a modest amount of effort here might pay some useful dividends by creating a few more targets for the amateur Google sleuths out there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might want to try a suggestion from a previous poster: create a bunch of other 'fake' Erik Trimbles with obviously different profile information and randomly selected photos and the begin replying to lots of various blogs with those accounts and generally muddy the waters on Google for any Erik Trimble searches.
This disinformation campaign could be as simple or elaborate as you like, but even a modest amount of effort here might pay some useful dividends by creating a few more targets for the amateur Google sleuths out there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394988</id>
	<title>clearing one's name is for innocent people</title>
	<author>fche</author>
	<datestamp>1260442620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And since the submitter admits to his misbehavior, what she means is "whitewash" or "pardon".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And since the submitter admits to his misbehavior , what she means is " whitewash " or " pardon " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And since the submitter admits to his misbehavior, what she means is "whitewash" or "pardon".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397010</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260451740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You, sir, are a class-A cock bite. Also, read up on robots.txt</htmltext>
<tokenext>You , sir , are a class-A cock bite .
Also , read up on robots.txt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You, sir, are a class-A cock bite.
Also, read up on robots.txt</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395762</id>
	<title>Re:And here's the payback coming to the Internet G</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1260445440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IT's no going to be a problem for long.</p><p>When the generation that first took to My Space and facebook get to about 40, everyone will realize that it's stupid to judge people by some whacky  thinkg they did when they were 15. Once a significant portion of people are in the same boat, no one will care.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IT 's no going to be a problem for long.When the generation that first took to My Space and facebook get to about 40 , everyone will realize that it 's stupid to judge people by some whacky thinkg they did when they were 15 .
Once a significant portion of people are in the same boat , no one will care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IT's no going to be a problem for long.When the generation that first took to My Space and facebook get to about 40, everyone will realize that it's stupid to judge people by some whacky  thinkg they did when they were 15.
Once a significant portion of people are in the same boat, no one will care.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395128</id>
	<title>Change the spelling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260443160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Keep your name, just have the spelling legally changed.  That way your references will still respond to emails and phone calls, but you get a fresh set of search results.</p><p>Oh -- make sure to search any name you're considering changing your name to.  Don't want to make things worse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Keep your name , just have the spelling legally changed .
That way your references will still respond to emails and phone calls , but you get a fresh set of search results.Oh -- make sure to search any name you 're considering changing your name to .
Do n't want to make things worse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keep your name, just have the spelling legally changed.
That way your references will still respond to emails and phone calls, but you get a fresh set of search results.Oh -- make sure to search any name you're considering changing your name to.
Don't want to make things worse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401642</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>identity0</author>
	<datestamp>1260546480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I reading this right? You get "a half dozen requests per year on average" - or 1 every couple of months - to take down photos, and that's too much work for you?</p><p>If you can't take that much time to admin your site, which is minimal, you shouldn't be posting them up in the first place.</p><p>Please practice responsible web administration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I reading this right ?
You get " a half dozen requests per year on average " - or 1 every couple of months - to take down photos , and that 's too much work for you ? If you ca n't take that much time to admin your site , which is minimal , you should n't be posting them up in the first place.Please practice responsible web administration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I reading this right?
You get "a half dozen requests per year on average" - or 1 every couple of months - to take down photos, and that's too much work for you?If you can't take that much time to admin your site, which is minimal, you shouldn't be posting them up in the first place.Please practice responsible web administration.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396512</id>
	<title>Jack Gorrie passed away in 2003 due to cancer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260448800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jack Gorrie
The University of Toronto mourns the recent passing of Jack Gorrie, the university Provost's Adviser on Information Technology, and more recently, a member of ORANOs Board of Directors. Gorrie, 55, passed away on Aug. 30 after a short battle with pancreatic cancer. This is a major loss to ORANO and our university community, said ORANOs Board Chair, Dr. Ross Paul, President of the University of Windsor. His years of experience brought an important perspective to our work at ORANO. He will be missed, he said. An obituary notice was published in the Globe and Mail. The University of Toronto also issued an announcement.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jack Gorrie The University of Toronto mourns the recent passing of Jack Gorrie , the university Provost 's Adviser on Information Technology , and more recently , a member of ORANOs Board of Directors .
Gorrie , 55 , passed away on Aug. 30 after a short battle with pancreatic cancer .
This is a major loss to ORANO and our university community , said ORANOs Board Chair , Dr. Ross Paul , President of the University of Windsor .
His years of experience brought an important perspective to our work at ORANO .
He will be missed , he said .
An obituary notice was published in the Globe and Mail .
The University of Toronto also issued an announcement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jack Gorrie
The University of Toronto mourns the recent passing of Jack Gorrie, the university Provost's Adviser on Information Technology, and more recently, a member of ORANOs Board of Directors.
Gorrie, 55, passed away on Aug. 30 after a short battle with pancreatic cancer.
This is a major loss to ORANO and our university community, said ORANOs Board Chair, Dr. Ross Paul, President of the University of Windsor.
His years of experience brought an important perspective to our work at ORANO.
He will be missed, he said.
An obituary notice was published in the Globe and Mail.
The University of Toronto also issued an announcement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394548</id>
	<title>Change your name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Change your name.</p><p>I know it sounds extreme, but it would solve the problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Change your name.I know it sounds extreme , but it would solve the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Change your name.I know it sounds extreme, but it would solve the problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395654</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260445080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>on SyFy Channel</p></div></blockquote><p>SyFy, FtFy</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>on SyFy ChannelSyFy , FtFy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>on SyFy ChannelSyFy, FtFy
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395044</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1260442860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig. Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.</p><p>Sorry for the typos - I'm typing on a mac.<br>I'm not usd to this keyboard'</p></div><p>You're using a mac?  Well, good luck on getting hired by MS for the next 7 years.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>IMHO just as thre 's a 7-year stature of limitations on law , so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig .
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.Sorry for the typos - I 'm typing on a mac.I 'm not usd to this keyboard'You 're using a mac ?
Well , good luck on getting hired by MS for the next 7 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig.
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.Sorry for the typos - I'm typing on a mac.I'm not usd to this keyboard'You're using a mac?
Well, good luck on getting hired by MS for the next 7 years.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396216</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>Khashishi</author>
	<datestamp>1260447240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Way to go, asshole. I assumed decent people would be tactful enough to not dig it up, given the current situation.</p><p>Whatever, I've got karma to burn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Way to go , asshole .
I assumed decent people would be tactful enough to not dig it up , given the current situation.Whatever , I 've got karma to burn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Way to go, asshole.
I assumed decent people would be tactful enough to not dig it up, given the current situation.Whatever, I've got karma to burn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397930</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260459540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Change your name... that is something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Change your name... that is something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Change your name... that is something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396460</id>
	<title>You are going about this the wrong way</title>
	<author>al0ha</author>
	<datestamp>1260448500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Instead of trying to get the information removed and perform a cover-up like the shady Bush Cheney administration, why not blog about your mistake, how it happened, what you learned from it and how you have grown since then.  If you blog this information on a prominent blogging site, it will be easily found as well and then problem solved.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of trying to get the information removed and perform a cover-up like the shady Bush Cheney administration , why not blog about your mistake , how it happened , what you learned from it and how you have grown since then .
If you blog this information on a prominent blogging site , it will be easily found as well and then problem solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of trying to get the information removed and perform a cover-up like the shady Bush Cheney administration, why not blog about your mistake, how it happened, what you learned from it and how you have grown since then.
If you blog this information on a prominent blogging site, it will be easily found as well and then problem solved.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398136</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260462480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So in other words, you're a douchebag.  How hard is it to take a couple of pictures off of a website from years ago?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So in other words , you 're a douchebag .
How hard is it to take a couple of pictures off of a website from years ago ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So in other words, you're a douchebag.
How hard is it to take a couple of pictures off of a website from years ago?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396918</id>
	<title>Take Responsibility</title>
	<author>narcc</author>
	<datestamp>1260451200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hate to break the news to you, but actions have consequences.</p><p>Get over yourself and take responsibility for the choices you made.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to break the news to you , but actions have consequences.Get over yourself and take responsibility for the choices you made .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to break the news to you, but actions have consequences.Get over yourself and take responsibility for the choices you made.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395326</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>6Yankee</author>
	<datestamp>1260443940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Sorry for the typos - <b>I'm typing on a mac.</b><br>I'm not usd to this keyboard'<br>--<br><b>MY MAC'S DEAD.</b> I installed Security update 2009-005, rebooted, and now it won't startup. Maybe an MS programmer wrote it</i></p><p>That's a clever trick!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry for the typos - I 'm typing on a mac.I 'm not usd to this keyboard'--MY MAC 'S DEAD .
I installed Security update 2009-005 , rebooted , and now it wo n't startup .
Maybe an MS programmer wrote itThat 's a clever trick !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry for the typos - I'm typing on a mac.I'm not usd to this keyboard'--MY MAC'S DEAD.
I installed Security update 2009-005, rebooted, and now it won't startup.
Maybe an MS programmer wrote itThat's a clever trick!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684</id>
	<title>you bet I've had similar concerns</title>
	<author>2ms</author>
	<datestamp>1260441660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In fact, it bugs me nearly every day:</p><p>A few years ago I was living in a place for just a few weeks and using the computer that came with the room there.  Unfortunately, I apparently left my browser with the cookie or whatever that automatically logged me into gmail account.  So, some asshole came along after I left and used the opportunity to use my email account to register for some forum that discusses getting Viagra in all kinds of illegal ways.  My gmail address is basically exactly my name.</p><p>So every time I apply for a job, every time I apply for an apartment or whatever, when I meet a girl etc, I feel like someone's going to Google me and nearly the first result that pops up is all this crap about all kinds of illegal ways of getting Viagra for recreation use etc.  It's a nightmare.  I've done everything I can to email administrators of the forum (which has now seemed to be swallowed up into other forums so the same posts appear on several different sites) but no one ever returns my emails no matter how much I explain the situation.  Due to the nature of my work, I'm very confident this has in fact impacted my career.  I don't want to think about things like potential girlfriends, housemates, people generally interested in what I've done in the (scientific) community I work in, etc.</p><p>If anyone has any ideas for me on what I could do it would be IMMENSELY valuable to me.  I'm very glad this has come up on Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact , it bugs me nearly every day : A few years ago I was living in a place for just a few weeks and using the computer that came with the room there .
Unfortunately , I apparently left my browser with the cookie or whatever that automatically logged me into gmail account .
So , some asshole came along after I left and used the opportunity to use my email account to register for some forum that discusses getting Viagra in all kinds of illegal ways .
My gmail address is basically exactly my name.So every time I apply for a job , every time I apply for an apartment or whatever , when I meet a girl etc , I feel like someone 's going to Google me and nearly the first result that pops up is all this crap about all kinds of illegal ways of getting Viagra for recreation use etc .
It 's a nightmare .
I 've done everything I can to email administrators of the forum ( which has now seemed to be swallowed up into other forums so the same posts appear on several different sites ) but no one ever returns my emails no matter how much I explain the situation .
Due to the nature of my work , I 'm very confident this has in fact impacted my career .
I do n't want to think about things like potential girlfriends , housemates , people generally interested in what I 've done in the ( scientific ) community I work in , etc.If anyone has any ideas for me on what I could do it would be IMMENSELY valuable to me .
I 'm very glad this has come up on Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fact, it bugs me nearly every day:A few years ago I was living in a place for just a few weeks and using the computer that came with the room there.
Unfortunately, I apparently left my browser with the cookie or whatever that automatically logged me into gmail account.
So, some asshole came along after I left and used the opportunity to use my email account to register for some forum that discusses getting Viagra in all kinds of illegal ways.
My gmail address is basically exactly my name.So every time I apply for a job, every time I apply for an apartment or whatever, when I meet a girl etc, I feel like someone's going to Google me and nearly the first result that pops up is all this crap about all kinds of illegal ways of getting Viagra for recreation use etc.
It's a nightmare.
I've done everything I can to email administrators of the forum (which has now seemed to be swallowed up into other forums so the same posts appear on several different sites) but no one ever returns my emails no matter how much I explain the situation.
Due to the nature of my work, I'm very confident this has in fact impacted my career.
I don't want to think about things like potential girlfriends, housemates, people generally interested in what I've done in the (scientific) community I work in, etc.If anyone has any ideas for me on what I could do it would be IMMENSELY valuable to me.
I'm very glad this has come up on Slashdot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394728</id>
	<title>Re:smokescreen</title>
	<author>EmagGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1260441720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An employer does not have to give you a reason for not hiring you, although they cannot deny you based solely on your race, religion, age, gender, and some other protected classes. That said, most employers write down plenty of negative stuff about you during your interview, and very little positive stuff, even if they really like you. If it goes to court, they can say "hey, here are our notes. You can plainly see this candidate was not that impressive."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An employer does not have to give you a reason for not hiring you , although they can not deny you based solely on your race , religion , age , gender , and some other protected classes .
That said , most employers write down plenty of negative stuff about you during your interview , and very little positive stuff , even if they really like you .
If it goes to court , they can say " hey , here are our notes .
You can plainly see this candidate was not that impressive .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An employer does not have to give you a reason for not hiring you, although they cannot deny you based solely on your race, religion, age, gender, and some other protected classes.
That said, most employers write down plenty of negative stuff about you during your interview, and very little positive stuff, even if they really like you.
If it goes to court, they can say "hey, here are our notes.
You can plainly see this candidate was not that impressive.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395392</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>chucklebutte</author>
	<datestamp>1260444120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>He didnt get arrested or go to jail. Seems like not a big deal, unless im wrong like hacked FBI web site and put up kiddie porn or something to that nature.... and if that was the case im sure he wouldnt be posting this cause he would probably be in jail still lol.

I wouldnt worry so much, and if you did something cool might help you more than hurt, ya know like you know your stuff, you are so good, the best, etc, etc....</htmltext>
<tokenext>He didnt get arrested or go to jail .
Seems like not a big deal , unless im wrong like hacked FBI web site and put up kiddie porn or something to that nature.... and if that was the case im sure he wouldnt be posting this cause he would probably be in jail still lol .
I wouldnt worry so much , and if you did something cool might help you more than hurt , ya know like you know your stuff , you are so good , the best , etc , etc... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He didnt get arrested or go to jail.
Seems like not a big deal, unless im wrong like hacked FBI web site and put up kiddie porn or something to that nature.... and if that was the case im sure he wouldnt be posting this cause he would probably be in jail still lol.
I wouldnt worry so much, and if you did something cool might help you more than hurt, ya know like you know your stuff, you are so good, the best, etc, etc....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400690</id>
	<title>Google's cache</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260541620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes I have had a similar experience - you can read about it <a href="http://c0dingm0nk3y.blogspot.com/2009/07/cleaning-out-private-data-from-google.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">here.</a> [blogspot.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes I have had a similar experience - you can read about it here .
[ blogspot.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes I have had a similar experience - you can read about it here.
[blogspot.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395834</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260445740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That last paragraph reads like this:</p><p>I take pride in damaging people's reputations.</p><p>You're a prick, Shawn McHorse. I wouldn't hire you to mow my lawn. Eat that, google.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That last paragraph reads like this : I take pride in damaging people 's reputations.You 're a prick , Shawn McHorse .
I would n't hire you to mow my lawn .
Eat that , google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That last paragraph reads like this:I take pride in damaging people's reputations.You're a prick, Shawn McHorse.
I wouldn't hire you to mow my lawn.
Eat that, google.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395218</id>
	<title>Re:Use it in the interview..</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1260443520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Did you ever consider taking what you did and using it as a reason they SHOULD hire you?</i> </p><p>Have you ever considered slitting your own throat?</p><p>There is a difference between owning up to having done something stupid and dangerous and trying to give it a positive spin.</p><p>The first can be taken as a sign of maturity. The second that you haven't really learned anything at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you ever consider taking what you did and using it as a reason they SHOULD hire you ?
Have you ever considered slitting your own throat ? There is a difference between owning up to having done something stupid and dangerous and trying to give it a positive spin.The first can be taken as a sign of maturity .
The second that you have n't really learned anything at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you ever consider taking what you did and using it as a reason they SHOULD hire you?
Have you ever considered slitting your own throat?There is a difference between owning up to having done something stupid and dangerous and trying to give it a positive spin.The first can be taken as a sign of maturity.
The second that you haven't really learned anything at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394912</id>
	<title>If you can't remove signal, increase noise...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260442320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Create a whole bunch of fake identities with the same name. Script them so that they are closer to the person described in the file than you appear to be. Run pipl.com a few times to see how it all turns out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Create a whole bunch of fake identities with the same name .
Script them so that they are closer to the person described in the file than you appear to be .
Run pipl.com a few times to see how it all turns out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Create a whole bunch of fake identities with the same name.
Script them so that they are closer to the person described in the file than you appear to be.
Run pipl.com a few times to see how it all turns out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30410514</id>
	<title>Re:you bet I've had similar concerns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260549060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's the secret you're afraid of: The right kind of girls will actually become more attracted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the secret you 're afraid of : The right kind of girls will actually become more attracted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the secret you're afraid of: The right kind of girls will actually become more attracted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395670</id>
	<title>How could /. possibly make things worse?</title>
	<author>Zaphod Beeblibrox</author>
	<datestamp>1260445140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jake Baker

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United\_States\_v.\_Baker" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United\_States\_v.\_Baker</a> [wikipedia.org]

<a href="http://www.textfiles.com/magazines/CHN/time1.txt" title="textfiles.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.textfiles.com/magazines/CHN/time1.txt</a> [textfiles.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jake Baker http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United \ _States \ _v. \ _Baker [ wikipedia.org ] http : //www.textfiles.com/magazines/CHN/time1.txt [ textfiles.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jake Baker

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United\_States\_v.\_Baker [wikipedia.org]

http://www.textfiles.com/magazines/CHN/time1.txt [textfiles.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395622</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>GodfatherofSoul</author>
	<datestamp>1260445020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your mother never taught you the difference between what what <b>can</b> be said and what <b>should</b> be said, did she?  Very jerkwad-ish of you<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your mother never taught you the difference between what what can be said and what should be said , did she ?
Very jerkwad-ish of you : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your mother never taught you the difference between what what can be said and what should be said, did she?
Very jerkwad-ish of you :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397536</id>
	<title>Re:How common is your name?</title>
	<author>Nyckname</author>
	<datestamp>1260456180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>  Build up identities with the same name but obviously different information. We'll assume his name is so unique there's only him to find</p></div><p>Anyone who is going to hold a several year old indiscretion against someone is likely to be suspicious of profiles popping up with no histories before today.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Build up identities with the same name but obviously different information .
We 'll assume his name is so unique there 's only him to findAnyone who is going to hold a several year old indiscretion against someone is likely to be suspicious of profiles popping up with no histories before today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  Build up identities with the same name but obviously different information.
We'll assume his name is so unique there's only him to findAnyone who is going to hold a several year old indiscretion against someone is likely to be suspicious of profiles popping up with no histories before today.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396842</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>bigdonthedj</author>
	<datestamp>1260450720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't worry too much. The worst that can happen to you is you might be made to run for some public office. Who knows. Maybe you could end up a senator! (This is only half tongue in cheek...this does happen)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry too much .
The worst that can happen to you is you might be made to run for some public office .
Who knows .
Maybe you could end up a senator !
( This is only half tongue in cheek...this does happen )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry too much.
The worst that can happen to you is you might be made to run for some public office.
Who knows.
Maybe you could end up a senator!
(This is only half tongue in cheek...this does happen)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397854</id>
	<title>Just explain the circumstances</title>
	<author>dilvish\_the\_damned</author>
	<datestamp>1260458880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Explain that you were required to do this after being issued notice of double-dog-dare.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Explain that you were required to do this after being issued notice of double-dog-dare .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Explain that you were required to do this after being issued notice of double-dog-dare.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395060</id>
	<title>And here's the payback coming to the Internet Gen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260442920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First off, to everyone who knows me:   <b>This wasn't my story submission</b>

</p><p>OK, now that's out of the way, I suffer from a related, but not quite so bad situation:
I'm pretty much the only Erik Trimble on the Internet (that's not true, but close enough).
Google me, and 90\% of the first 100 returns point to me, in some way or not (FYI - the MySpace
page for "leathercladdemon" isn't me. Really.)    There's nothing bad there, it's just
that my life has evolved, and having absolutely all of it retained and searchable over the past 20 years
allows people to draw incorrect assumptions about me.

</p><p>This is all the privacy problems that the current young generations seem to be
completely oblivious to, and that pundits like to ignore.  People's perceptions of you matter,
as much as we'd like to think otherwise.  That doesn't mean it has to rule your life, but
to think that such perceptions don't matter is foolish.  The problem with retaining all this
data out in the open is that it seriously harms the ability of people to change.  And we
want people to change.  Lots of Very Bad Things happen to society if we forbid
people (either legally, or de facto)  from changing their paths in life.
For just a minor example, look at what being convicted of <i>anything</i> does to one's entire life.
It's not good to have complete personal transparency.

</p><p>I don't have a solution. At least not a simple one. But it needs to understood
by everyone that it IS a problem.

</p><p>-Erik</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First off , to everyone who knows me : This was n't my story submission OK , now that 's out of the way , I suffer from a related , but not quite so bad situation : I 'm pretty much the only Erik Trimble on the Internet ( that 's not true , but close enough ) .
Google me , and 90 \ % of the first 100 returns point to me , in some way or not ( FYI - the MySpace page for " leathercladdemon " is n't me .
Really. ) There 's nothing bad there , it 's just that my life has evolved , and having absolutely all of it retained and searchable over the past 20 years allows people to draw incorrect assumptions about me .
This is all the privacy problems that the current young generations seem to be completely oblivious to , and that pundits like to ignore .
People 's perceptions of you matter , as much as we 'd like to think otherwise .
That does n't mean it has to rule your life , but to think that such perceptions do n't matter is foolish .
The problem with retaining all this data out in the open is that it seriously harms the ability of people to change .
And we want people to change .
Lots of Very Bad Things happen to society if we forbid people ( either legally , or de facto ) from changing their paths in life .
For just a minor example , look at what being convicted of anything does to one 's entire life .
It 's not good to have complete personal transparency .
I do n't have a solution .
At least not a simple one .
But it needs to understood by everyone that it IS a problem .
-Erik</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First off, to everyone who knows me:   This wasn't my story submission

OK, now that's out of the way, I suffer from a related, but not quite so bad situation:
I'm pretty much the only Erik Trimble on the Internet (that's not true, but close enough).
Google me, and 90\% of the first 100 returns point to me, in some way or not (FYI - the MySpace
page for "leathercladdemon" isn't me.
Really.)    There's nothing bad there, it's just
that my life has evolved, and having absolutely all of it retained and searchable over the past 20 years
allows people to draw incorrect assumptions about me.
This is all the privacy problems that the current young generations seem to be
completely oblivious to, and that pundits like to ignore.
People's perceptions of you matter,
as much as we'd like to think otherwise.
That doesn't mean it has to rule your life, but
to think that such perceptions don't matter is foolish.
The problem with retaining all this
data out in the open is that it seriously harms the ability of people to change.
And we
want people to change.
Lots of Very Bad Things happen to society if we forbid
people (either legally, or de facto)  from changing their paths in life.
For just a minor example, look at what being convicted of anything does to one's entire life.
It's not good to have complete personal transparency.
I don't have a solution.
At least not a simple one.
But it needs to understood
by everyone that it IS a problem.
-Erik</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398010</id>
	<title>To Human is err.</title>
	<author>Neanderthal Ninny</author>
	<datestamp>1260460560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It appears that you learned from your mistakes so you want to be a normal law abiding person now. The most important thing in that sentence is "learned from your mistakes", we are all human and learning from our mistakes is an important part of life and we should not held for minor infractions we did in our lives. People that "never" make mistakes when they were young will make them later in life and that is not a time to learn.<br>Back to original subject of getting your name off the damned cached file servers around the world is tricky. As for the rest of the world, there are no treaties or regulations on this thing so the best way is to contact the local law enforcement, political and legal authorities where the file is located and find out what they can do to assist you. As for the USA, the ACLU or other legal help organizations can help you create an "cease and desist" order and have them forcefully remove those files.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It appears that you learned from your mistakes so you want to be a normal law abiding person now .
The most important thing in that sentence is " learned from your mistakes " , we are all human and learning from our mistakes is an important part of life and we should not held for minor infractions we did in our lives .
People that " never " make mistakes when they were young will make them later in life and that is not a time to learn.Back to original subject of getting your name off the damned cached file servers around the world is tricky .
As for the rest of the world , there are no treaties or regulations on this thing so the best way is to contact the local law enforcement , political and legal authorities where the file is located and find out what they can do to assist you .
As for the USA , the ACLU or other legal help organizations can help you create an " cease and desist " order and have them forcefully remove those files .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It appears that you learned from your mistakes so you want to be a normal law abiding person now.
The most important thing in that sentence is "learned from your mistakes", we are all human and learning from our mistakes is an important part of life and we should not held for minor infractions we did in our lives.
People that "never" make mistakes when they were young will make them later in life and that is not a time to learn.Back to original subject of getting your name off the damned cached file servers around the world is tricky.
As for the rest of the world, there are no treaties or regulations on this thing so the best way is to contact the local law enforcement, political and legal authorities where the file is located and find out what they can do to assist you.
As for the USA, the ACLU or other legal help organizations can help you create an "cease and desist" order and have them forcefully remove those files.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394804</id>
	<title>It's just like Vegas!</title>
	<author>Scragglykat</author>
	<datestamp>1260441960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What you do in cyberspace, stays in cyberspace! Unfortunately, cyberspace is a bit more accessible than Vegas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What you do in cyberspace , stays in cyberspace !
Unfortunately , cyberspace is a bit more accessible than Vegas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What you do in cyberspace, stays in cyberspace!
Unfortunately, cyberspace is a bit more accessible than Vegas.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394854</id>
	<title>Re:Sucks, hey?</title>
	<author>Kythe</author>
	<datestamp>1260442140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I always have to wonder whether people who post comments like these would be the first to complain if their own foibles were at issue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always have to wonder whether people who post comments like these would be the first to complain if their own foibles were at issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always have to wonder whether people who post comments like these would be the first to complain if their own foibles were at issue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</id>
	<title>I see the other end of this problem rather often</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm a long-term Rocky Horror Picture Show cast member, and I run a <a href="http://www.austinrocky.org/" title="austinrocky.org">web site</a> [austinrocky.org] for our local cast in Austin.  I've been running this web site for over a decade now.</p><p>Cast members are frequently very interested to see photographs of themselves performing in the show.  And since it's Rocky Horror, they're usually wearing lingerie of some sort.  At the time the photos are posted, they're invariably very excited about this.  Especially because I take pride in my photography, and most people haven't seen photos of themselves prior to this that someone had actually put significant work into.</p><p>A few years later though, these same people have frequently quit the cast, possibly graduated from college, and moved on to other activities.  They may decide they want to apply for jobs in education, as music minister of a church, etc.  They do some vanity searching on Google and are shocked... shocked I tell you!... that the Rocky Horror cast web site is still online and kicking with what had been posted some years previously.</p><p>Now keep in mind this is a hobby web site that I do purely for the enjoyment of myself and other cast members.  It's done in my spare time, and I've always paid for it out of pocket.</p><p>I'm sure I could honor requests to remove all of these photos, but I simply don't want to.  It involves a lot of time and effort on my end, to accomplish something that's actively taking away from things I take pride in myself.  I get probably a half dozen requests per year on average at this point all basically saying the same thing: "Take down my photos now! You're causing damage to my reputation!".  At some point I just had to say to hell with them all and whip up a form letter response saying "Sorry, but I'm just not going to do anything about it".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a long-term Rocky Horror Picture Show cast member , and I run a web site [ austinrocky.org ] for our local cast in Austin .
I 've been running this web site for over a decade now.Cast members are frequently very interested to see photographs of themselves performing in the show .
And since it 's Rocky Horror , they 're usually wearing lingerie of some sort .
At the time the photos are posted , they 're invariably very excited about this .
Especially because I take pride in my photography , and most people have n't seen photos of themselves prior to this that someone had actually put significant work into.A few years later though , these same people have frequently quit the cast , possibly graduated from college , and moved on to other activities .
They may decide they want to apply for jobs in education , as music minister of a church , etc .
They do some vanity searching on Google and are shocked... shocked I tell you ! .. .
that the Rocky Horror cast web site is still online and kicking with what had been posted some years previously.Now keep in mind this is a hobby web site that I do purely for the enjoyment of myself and other cast members .
It 's done in my spare time , and I 've always paid for it out of pocket.I 'm sure I could honor requests to remove all of these photos , but I simply do n't want to .
It involves a lot of time and effort on my end , to accomplish something that 's actively taking away from things I take pride in myself .
I get probably a half dozen requests per year on average at this point all basically saying the same thing : " Take down my photos now !
You 're causing damage to my reputation ! " .
At some point I just had to say to hell with them all and whip up a form letter response saying " Sorry , but I 'm just not going to do anything about it " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a long-term Rocky Horror Picture Show cast member, and I run a web site [austinrocky.org] for our local cast in Austin.
I've been running this web site for over a decade now.Cast members are frequently very interested to see photographs of themselves performing in the show.
And since it's Rocky Horror, they're usually wearing lingerie of some sort.
At the time the photos are posted, they're invariably very excited about this.
Especially because I take pride in my photography, and most people haven't seen photos of themselves prior to this that someone had actually put significant work into.A few years later though, these same people have frequently quit the cast, possibly graduated from college, and moved on to other activities.
They may decide they want to apply for jobs in education, as music minister of a church, etc.
They do some vanity searching on Google and are shocked... shocked I tell you!...
that the Rocky Horror cast web site is still online and kicking with what had been posted some years previously.Now keep in mind this is a hobby web site that I do purely for the enjoyment of myself and other cast members.
It's done in my spare time, and I've always paid for it out of pocket.I'm sure I could honor requests to remove all of these photos, but I simply don't want to.
It involves a lot of time and effort on my end, to accomplish something that's actively taking away from things I take pride in myself.
I get probably a half dozen requests per year on average at this point all basically saying the same thing: "Take down my photos now!
You're causing damage to my reputation!".
At some point I just had to say to hell with them all and whip up a form letter response saying "Sorry, but I'm just not going to do anything about it".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394744</id>
	<title>Misleading......</title>
	<author>ewenix</author>
	<datestamp>1260441780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This article should be titled:  "How to drive a bunch of stupid slashdotters to my website and increase traffic by 1000\%"</htmltext>
<tokenext>This article should be titled : " How to drive a bunch of stupid slashdotters to my website and increase traffic by 1000 \ % "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This article should be titled:  "How to drive a bunch of stupid slashdotters to my website and increase traffic by 1000\%"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395656</id>
	<title>don't remove.  add.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260445080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The goal is not to remove what was said or to focus on it.  If you try to cram a genie back into a bottle, you just end up with a bloody pulverized genie (or a pissed off one) and that's far more noticeable.  Instead, say and do interesting and useful things.  Make your college escapades waldo in a where's waldo picture.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The goal is not to remove what was said or to focus on it .
If you try to cram a genie back into a bottle , you just end up with a bloody pulverized genie ( or a pissed off one ) and that 's far more noticeable .
Instead , say and do interesting and useful things .
Make your college escapades waldo in a where 's waldo picture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The goal is not to remove what was said or to focus on it.
If you try to cram a genie back into a bottle, you just end up with a bloody pulverized genie (or a pissed off one) and that's far more noticeable.
Instead, say and do interesting and useful things.
Make your college escapades waldo in a where's waldo picture.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30405146</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>osmosium</author>
	<datestamp>1260560700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good reply,  how dumb can you be, and NOW hes worried about it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good reply , how dumb can you be , and NOW hes worried about it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good reply,  how dumb can you be, and NOW hes worried about it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397038</id>
	<title>Hey</title>
	<author>cbraescu1</author>
	<datestamp>1260451980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that you, Kevin Mitnick?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that you , Kevin Mitnick ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that you, Kevin Mitnick?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395850</id>
	<title>Re:Not keeping low profile?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260445800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to agree with this. I am *ALL OVER* the net. A search for my name brings my homepage up as number 3 link on google. Long ago I made a slightly off-color comment on a very widely mirrored mailing list that I would prefer employers not see. Probably not a big deal if they do but it wasn't entirely professional and I'm big on being professional so it embarrasses me.</p><p>I don't really worry about it because there are 10,000 hits for my name and a project I am associated with. 1.5 million hits for my most commonly used email address. It is quite unlikely that they will encounter that one incident among all of the other positive references to my name online. So either accept that they will see that OR start making a name for yourself. It is a great way to stand out among other job applicants who don't turn up hardly anything in a google search. It has even reached a point where I may actually suggest they google me if they have not already. There is no better reference than 15 years of quality contributions.</p><p>It is very unlikely that you have ever heard of me but plenty of people have in my local circles and my name has become a bit of a brand for me. I have done this by professionally getting involved and posting and participating all over the place. In fact, just yesterday during the annual company meeting my boss (the owner) said in front of the whole company that he hired me this past year in large part because he has read my writings online and was impressed that there existed a tech guy who could actually communicate his ideas. Distinguishing yourself by having a strong online presence can not only help cover up youthful indiscretions but can also make you stand out in a crowd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to agree with this .
I am * ALL OVER * the net .
A search for my name brings my homepage up as number 3 link on google .
Long ago I made a slightly off-color comment on a very widely mirrored mailing list that I would prefer employers not see .
Probably not a big deal if they do but it was n't entirely professional and I 'm big on being professional so it embarrasses me.I do n't really worry about it because there are 10,000 hits for my name and a project I am associated with .
1.5 million hits for my most commonly used email address .
It is quite unlikely that they will encounter that one incident among all of the other positive references to my name online .
So either accept that they will see that OR start making a name for yourself .
It is a great way to stand out among other job applicants who do n't turn up hardly anything in a google search .
It has even reached a point where I may actually suggest they google me if they have not already .
There is no better reference than 15 years of quality contributions.It is very unlikely that you have ever heard of me but plenty of people have in my local circles and my name has become a bit of a brand for me .
I have done this by professionally getting involved and posting and participating all over the place .
In fact , just yesterday during the annual company meeting my boss ( the owner ) said in front of the whole company that he hired me this past year in large part because he has read my writings online and was impressed that there existed a tech guy who could actually communicate his ideas .
Distinguishing yourself by having a strong online presence can not only help cover up youthful indiscretions but can also make you stand out in a crowd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to agree with this.
I am *ALL OVER* the net.
A search for my name brings my homepage up as number 3 link on google.
Long ago I made a slightly off-color comment on a very widely mirrored mailing list that I would prefer employers not see.
Probably not a big deal if they do but it wasn't entirely professional and I'm big on being professional so it embarrasses me.I don't really worry about it because there are 10,000 hits for my name and a project I am associated with.
1.5 million hits for my most commonly used email address.
It is quite unlikely that they will encounter that one incident among all of the other positive references to my name online.
So either accept that they will see that OR start making a name for yourself.
It is a great way to stand out among other job applicants who don't turn up hardly anything in a google search.
It has even reached a point where I may actually suggest they google me if they have not already.
There is no better reference than 15 years of quality contributions.It is very unlikely that you have ever heard of me but plenty of people have in my local circles and my name has become a bit of a brand for me.
I have done this by professionally getting involved and posting and participating all over the place.
In fact, just yesterday during the annual company meeting my boss (the owner) said in front of the whole company that he hired me this past year in large part because he has read my writings online and was impressed that there existed a tech guy who could actually communicate his ideas.
Distinguishing yourself by having a strong online presence can not only help cover up youthful indiscretions but can also make you stand out in a crowd.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395234</id>
	<title>I know YOUR NAME</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260443580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your name is <a href="http://www.whitehouse.org/" title="whitehouse.org" rel="nofollow">George W. Bush</a> [whitehouse.org] and your crimes AGAINST Humanity.</p><p>You will NEVER be cleared.</p><p>Yours In Minsk,<br>K. Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your name is George W. Bush [ whitehouse.org ] and your crimes AGAINST Humanity.You will NEVER be cleared.Yours In Minsk,K .
Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your name is George W. Bush [whitehouse.org] and your crimes AGAINST Humanity.You will NEVER be cleared.Yours In Minsk,K.
Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394778</id>
	<title>Re:Use it in the interview..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You have to remember that the BBS days were full of hack/phreak/anarchy. Many of us were terrible children. If a kid did half the shit we did, or lied about doing, they would be carted off to gitmo never to be seen again. hell, they want to charge you with a crime for just having 'anarchy' files today.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have to remember that the BBS days were full of hack/phreak/anarchy .
Many of us were terrible children .
If a kid did half the shit we did , or lied about doing , they would be carted off to gitmo never to be seen again .
hell , they want to charge you with a crime for just having 'anarchy ' files today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have to remember that the BBS days were full of hack/phreak/anarchy.
Many of us were terrible children.
If a kid did half the shit we did, or lied about doing, they would be carted off to gitmo never to be seen again.
hell, they want to charge you with a crime for just having 'anarchy' files today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30410462</id>
	<title>Re:wtf kind of question is this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260548580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'd only point out that this distinction is one major difference between the USA and the rest of the world.</p></div><p>Like many Americans, you obviously don't get out much.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd only point out that this distinction is one major difference between the USA and the rest of the world.Like many Americans , you obviously do n't get out much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd only point out that this distinction is one major difference between the USA and the rest of the world.Like many Americans, you obviously don't get out much.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397528</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260456120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IANAL but don't forget the classic approaches:</p><p>Or lobby the state or federal legislatures to get a law passed or a lobby the people to get a constitutional amendment making it illegal for the website to maintain your history.</p><p>Or have your friend sue the company for take down if he still owns the copyright to the text.</p><p>Or buy the copyright back from whoever owns it and sue everyone who does not own it for damages.</p><p>Hire a private investigator to get dirt on the owner of the website.  If you have proof which would hold up in court, publish the dirt on your own web page.  Mention their connection to the website your information is on.  This discredits the source of information.  Wait for them to ask you to take it down.  Then laugh.  Perhaps they will develop empathy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IANAL but do n't forget the classic approaches : Or lobby the state or federal legislatures to get a law passed or a lobby the people to get a constitutional amendment making it illegal for the website to maintain your history.Or have your friend sue the company for take down if he still owns the copyright to the text.Or buy the copyright back from whoever owns it and sue everyone who does not own it for damages.Hire a private investigator to get dirt on the owner of the website .
If you have proof which would hold up in court , publish the dirt on your own web page .
Mention their connection to the website your information is on .
This discredits the source of information .
Wait for them to ask you to take it down .
Then laugh .
Perhaps they will develop empathy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IANAL but don't forget the classic approaches:Or lobby the state or federal legislatures to get a law passed or a lobby the people to get a constitutional amendment making it illegal for the website to maintain your history.Or have your friend sue the company for take down if he still owns the copyright to the text.Or buy the copyright back from whoever owns it and sue everyone who does not own it for damages.Hire a private investigator to get dirt on the owner of the website.
If you have proof which would hold up in court, publish the dirt on your own web page.
Mention their connection to the website your information is on.
This discredits the source of information.
Wait for them to ask you to take it down.
Then laugh.
Perhaps they will develop empathy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400668</id>
	<title>Tell us!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260541500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tell us what you did! We're curious as all hell now!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tell us what you did !
We 're curious as all hell now !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tell us what you did!
We're curious as all hell now!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395582</id>
	<title>Re:How common is your name?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260444840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>5) He could also legally change his name</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>5 ) He could also legally change his name</tokentext>
<sentencetext>5) He could also legally change his name</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398224</id>
	<title>Was already discussed this in /.</title>
	<author>mahadiga</author>
	<datestamp>1260464040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/17/1824232" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/17/1824232</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //yro.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 09/02/17/1824232 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/17/1824232 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397218</id>
	<title>permanent fix?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260453360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>change name only way you can be sure that it wouldn't tie back to you as easily.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>change name only way you can be sure that it would n't tie back to you as easily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>change name only way you can be sure that it wouldn't tie back to you as easily.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420</id>
	<title>How common is your name?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260440760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're "John Smith", I think it will be pretty easy to disclaim being the SAME John Smith unless there are a lot of other matching details.</p><p>On the other hand, if your last name is "Szczerbiak", maybe you can make a case for wanting to simplify the spelling and change it.</p><p>Basically those are the first two options I can think of -- dodge, and go stand somewhere else.</p><p>Mal-2</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're " John Smith " , I think it will be pretty easy to disclaim being the SAME John Smith unless there are a lot of other matching details.On the other hand , if your last name is " Szczerbiak " , maybe you can make a case for wanting to simplify the spelling and change it.Basically those are the first two options I can think of -- dodge , and go stand somewhere else.Mal-2</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're "John Smith", I think it will be pretty easy to disclaim being the SAME John Smith unless there are a lot of other matching details.On the other hand, if your last name is "Szczerbiak", maybe you can make a case for wanting to simplify the spelling and change it.Basically those are the first two options I can think of -- dodge, and go stand somewhere else.Mal-2</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394736</id>
	<title>not posing the question on Slashdot</title>
	<author>smadasam</author>
	<datestamp>1260441780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think posting this question on Slashdot was the best way to keep it low profile.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think posting this question on Slashdot was the best way to keep it low profile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think posting this question on Slashdot was the best way to keep it low profile.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398308</id>
	<title>Re:you bet I've had similar concerns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260465180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>there is a company called Reputation Defender that attempts to deal with this sort of problem.  Not sure how effective they are but the service is not expensive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>there is a company called Reputation Defender that attempts to deal with this sort of problem .
Not sure how effective they are but the service is not expensive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there is a company called Reputation Defender that attempts to deal with this sort of problem.
Not sure how effective they are but the service is not expensive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406</id>
	<title>Not keeping low profile?</title>
	<author>Lord Lode</author>
	<datestamp>1260440700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not sure how bad it is, but if someone types your name in google and the ONLY thing they find is that one thing you don't, then it'll stand out. Try to use your name for everything, so that those things appear first in the results.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure how bad it is , but if someone types your name in google and the ONLY thing they find is that one thing you do n't , then it 'll stand out .
Try to use your name for everything , so that those things appear first in the results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure how bad it is, but if someone types your name in google and the ONLY thing they find is that one thing you don't, then it'll stand out.
Try to use your name for everything, so that those things appear first in the results.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394652</id>
	<title>Stop worrying about it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, what you did in your youth and what you do now, with 15 years of maturity (I imagine) and life experience, will have very little in common. Kids do stuff, that's what being a kid is about (and by kid I include those in their early twenties). I employed and worked with people with, let's say, interesting backgrounds. Most were (and are) a damn sight more interesting than the straight laced types.

That said, not knowing what you did it's hard to comment fully.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , what you did in your youth and what you do now , with 15 years of maturity ( I imagine ) and life experience , will have very little in common .
Kids do stuff , that 's what being a kid is about ( and by kid I include those in their early twenties ) .
I employed and worked with people with , let 's say , interesting backgrounds .
Most were ( and are ) a damn sight more interesting than the straight laced types .
That said , not knowing what you did it 's hard to comment fully .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, what you did in your youth and what you do now, with 15 years of maturity (I imagine) and life experience, will have very little in common.
Kids do stuff, that's what being a kid is about (and by kid I include those in their early twenties).
I employed and worked with people with, let's say, interesting backgrounds.
Most were (and are) a damn sight more interesting than the straight laced types.
That said, not knowing what you did it's hard to comment fully.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394522</id>
	<title>Go Buddhist</title>
	<author>scorp1us</author>
	<datestamp>1260441120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no way you can track down all those bits and alter/destroy them. Regardless fo the legality, it is impossible from a legal perspective.</p><p>Go Buddhist, give up everything, change your name, (your SSN will stay, IIRC) and reinvent yourself. Seems to me to be a lot for a stupid text file. As someone who would work at a summer camp, I would disappear 3 months out of the year to the world outside the camp. I'd come back fresh, refreshed and unencumbered. Live off the net for a while and see how really irrelevant it is to the Real World.</p><p>or just maybe remove all the link destinations?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no way you can track down all those bits and alter/destroy them .
Regardless fo the legality , it is impossible from a legal perspective.Go Buddhist , give up everything , change your name , ( your SSN will stay , IIRC ) and reinvent yourself .
Seems to me to be a lot for a stupid text file .
As someone who would work at a summer camp , I would disappear 3 months out of the year to the world outside the camp .
I 'd come back fresh , refreshed and unencumbered .
Live off the net for a while and see how really irrelevant it is to the Real World.or just maybe remove all the link destinations ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no way you can track down all those bits and alter/destroy them.
Regardless fo the legality, it is impossible from a legal perspective.Go Buddhist, give up everything, change your name, (your SSN will stay, IIRC) and reinvent yourself.
Seems to me to be a lot for a stupid text file.
As someone who would work at a summer camp, I would disappear 3 months out of the year to the world outside the camp.
I'd come back fresh, refreshed and unencumbered.
Live off the net for a while and see how really irrelevant it is to the Real World.or just maybe remove all the link destinations?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397674</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260457200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your trying to compare destroying a company and the lives of numerous employees to someone getting drunk and posting pictures online or pulling a stupid prank in highschool or college 20 years ago. There is a MAJOR difference between the two which you seem to completely miss.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your trying to compare destroying a company and the lives of numerous employees to someone getting drunk and posting pictures online or pulling a stupid prank in highschool or college 20 years ago .
There is a MAJOR difference between the two which you seem to completely miss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your trying to compare destroying a company and the lives of numerous employees to someone getting drunk and posting pictures online or pulling a stupid prank in highschool or college 20 years ago.
There is a MAJOR difference between the two which you seem to completely miss.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397642</id>
	<title>Re:wtf kind of question is this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260457080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>uuuuuh,<br>is it really like that in the rest of the world?</p><p>-US citizen</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>uuuuuh,is it really like that in the rest of the world ? -US citizen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>uuuuuh,is it really like that in the rest of the world?-US citizen</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395500</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260444540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe this argument may work with people who don't actually know how little effort it is to change a webpage. Especially something as trivial as removing some images.</p><p>While I'm not homophobic like the guy above me, you are being a dick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe this argument may work with people who do n't actually know how little effort it is to change a webpage .
Especially something as trivial as removing some images.While I 'm not homophobic like the guy above me , you are being a dick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe this argument may work with people who don't actually know how little effort it is to change a webpage.
Especially something as trivial as removing some images.While I'm not homophobic like the guy above me, you are being a dick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396240</id>
	<title>Re:Well first...</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1260447360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>First[1], you need to invent a time machine.  Then you travel back in time and either convince your former self not to do it or you kill all the witnesses and destroy all the evidence.</p><p>[1] You can actually do it last, if you like.  Or in the middle.  Whenever.  It is a time machine, after[2] all.<br>[2] Or before all.  It is a time machine, after[3] all.<br>[3] Or before all.  It is <tt>stack overflow near line 5.  Bailing</tt> </p></div><p>Well, actually your comment caused all his problems. He went beck and tried to kill the witnesses, as of your advice (he knew, knowing himself, that trying to convince his former self would not have been successful). He already failed with the first, but this attempted killing is what caught the attention of the feds. Also the second and third attempt at killing witnesses failed, which made it quite simple for the feds to track it down to his past self. Also, it made the publishers of the text magazine aware of the case, which led to the article he wants to get rid of.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First [ 1 ] , you need to invent a time machine .
Then you travel back in time and either convince your former self not to do it or you kill all the witnesses and destroy all the evidence .
[ 1 ] You can actually do it last , if you like .
Or in the middle .
Whenever. It is a time machine , after [ 2 ] all .
[ 2 ] Or before all .
It is a time machine , after [ 3 ] all .
[ 3 ] Or before all .
It is stack overflow near line 5 .
Bailing Well , actually your comment caused all his problems .
He went beck and tried to kill the witnesses , as of your advice ( he knew , knowing himself , that trying to convince his former self would not have been successful ) .
He already failed with the first , but this attempted killing is what caught the attention of the feds .
Also the second and third attempt at killing witnesses failed , which made it quite simple for the feds to track it down to his past self .
Also , it made the publishers of the text magazine aware of the case , which led to the article he wants to get rid of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First[1], you need to invent a time machine.
Then you travel back in time and either convince your former self not to do it or you kill all the witnesses and destroy all the evidence.
[1] You can actually do it last, if you like.
Or in the middle.
Whenever.  It is a time machine, after[2] all.
[2] Or before all.
It is a time machine, after[3] all.
[3] Or before all.
It is stack overflow near line 5.
Bailing Well, actually your comment caused all his problems.
He went beck and tried to kill the witnesses, as of your advice (he knew, knowing himself, that trying to convince his former self would not have been successful).
He already failed with the first, but this attempted killing is what caught the attention of the feds.
Also the second and third attempt at killing witnesses failed, which made it quite simple for the feds to track it down to his past self.
Also, it made the publishers of the text magazine aware of the case, which led to the article he wants to get rid of.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399974</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>(arg!)Styopa</author>
	<datestamp>1260534240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too bad.</p><p>I know it would be MUCH more convenient if the world worked the way you suggest, but it doesn't.</p><p>See, there are a large number of people who actually TOOK the long view 10 or 15 years ago.  "Hm, I'd like to go to that party, but I signed a State High School Non-Alcohol commitment." or "You know, drunken topless table-dancing sounds like a great idea when I'm a smoking-hot hardbody at age 19.  But gosh, if someone takes a pic of me, that would really be embarrassing, SO I WON'T DO IT." or "Every one of my friends is toking up, and they're really enjoying it and it doesn't seem to be hurting them, but geez, I might want a job where they're going to drug-test me, so I guess I'll just pass."</p><p>As an employer if you a job candidate who was self-indulgent, didn't think through long term consequences, failed to plan for the future, and ended up with embarrassing blemishes on their record.</p><p>There's a place for self-indulgence: it's called childhood.  Grow up, and quit whinging if people judge you based on actions that you were old enough to know/understand could come back to haunt you.</p><p>Life has consequences, get over it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad.I know it would be MUCH more convenient if the world worked the way you suggest , but it does n't.See , there are a large number of people who actually TOOK the long view 10 or 15 years ago .
" Hm , I 'd like to go to that party , but I signed a State High School Non-Alcohol commitment .
" or " You know , drunken topless table-dancing sounds like a great idea when I 'm a smoking-hot hardbody at age 19 .
But gosh , if someone takes a pic of me , that would really be embarrassing , SO I WO N'T DO IT .
" or " Every one of my friends is toking up , and they 're really enjoying it and it does n't seem to be hurting them , but geez , I might want a job where they 're going to drug-test me , so I guess I 'll just pass .
" As an employer if you a job candidate who was self-indulgent , did n't think through long term consequences , failed to plan for the future , and ended up with embarrassing blemishes on their record.There 's a place for self-indulgence : it 's called childhood .
Grow up , and quit whinging if people judge you based on actions that you were old enough to know/understand could come back to haunt you.Life has consequences , get over it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad.I know it would be MUCH more convenient if the world worked the way you suggest, but it doesn't.See, there are a large number of people who actually TOOK the long view 10 or 15 years ago.
"Hm, I'd like to go to that party, but I signed a State High School Non-Alcohol commitment.
" or "You know, drunken topless table-dancing sounds like a great idea when I'm a smoking-hot hardbody at age 19.
But gosh, if someone takes a pic of me, that would really be embarrassing, SO I WON'T DO IT.
" or "Every one of my friends is toking up, and they're really enjoying it and it doesn't seem to be hurting them, but geez, I might want a job where they're going to drug-test me, so I guess I'll just pass.
"As an employer if you a job candidate who was self-indulgent, didn't think through long term consequences, failed to plan for the future, and ended up with embarrassing blemishes on their record.There's a place for self-indulgence: it's called childhood.
Grow up, and quit whinging if people judge you based on actions that you were old enough to know/understand could come back to haunt you.Life has consequences, get over it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395722</id>
	<title>Re:You are "Timothy Lord." Try Googling that, peop</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1260445320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>?? Tmothy posted something from an anonymous reader. He isn't the person asking the question</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>? ?
Tmothy posted something from an anonymous reader .
He is n't the person asking the question</tokentext>
<sentencetext>??
Tmothy posted something from an anonymous reader.
He isn't the person asking the question</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395094</id>
	<title>Jason Scott is fueled by your tears</title>
	<author>st1ckybit</author>
	<datestamp>1260443040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suppose it never occurred to you that all of those warnings people gave you about your actions following you for the rest of your life were accurate?

I am in nearly the exact same situation as you except that I am lucky enough to have never had my real name associated with my alias at the time.  However, I did not avoid a criminal record as you obviously did.  I'm pretty sure you knew exactly what you were doing at the time and that there were possible repercussions for your actions.  Now, part of being an adult is living with the life you've made for yourself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose it never occurred to you that all of those warnings people gave you about your actions following you for the rest of your life were accurate ?
I am in nearly the exact same situation as you except that I am lucky enough to have never had my real name associated with my alias at the time .
However , I did not avoid a criminal record as you obviously did .
I 'm pretty sure you knew exactly what you were doing at the time and that there were possible repercussions for your actions .
Now , part of being an adult is living with the life you 've made for yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose it never occurred to you that all of those warnings people gave you about your actions following you for the rest of your life were accurate?
I am in nearly the exact same situation as you except that I am lucky enough to have never had my real name associated with my alias at the time.
However, I did not avoid a criminal record as you obviously did.
I'm pretty sure you knew exactly what you were doing at the time and that there were possible repercussions for your actions.
Now, part of being an adult is living with the life you've made for yourself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402780</id>
	<title>You CAN Minimize The Damaging Article</title>
	<author>CharlesSeymourJr</author>
	<datestamp>1260551640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Timothy,

Here's an EASY way to minimize the damage of this article: flood Google with MORE articles about you and take over the real estate.

How many pages of Google do people search? 1, 2, MAYBE 3.

So YOU want to create lots of material which will force the old, static information about you to the END of the line.

How do you do this? Create a blog, use your name on it in the "signature" at the end (as I do on THIS post), and keep writing.

If you search MY name, Charles Seymour Jr (or Charlie Seymour Jr) you will see that I "own" the first 9 pages or so of search results. There are MANY thousands of pages (not all about me) that come up when a search on my name comes up and I have 8, 9, or 10 mentions on each of those first pages.

So, anything from years ago (being old and not changing, the way a blog changes) will be forced to back in the Google search.

Voila... THAT is your solution. And hey, it's a GOOD one in two ways - (1) you put out great material about you so when people search about you they find out what you think on one or more topics (keyword areas) and (2) it pushes the damaging material way back.

CURRENT info trumps old, static info every time.

Hope this helps! Good luck with this!

Charlie Seymour Jr
<a href="http://ultimateworkathomedads.com/" title="ultimatewo...medads.com" rel="nofollow">http://ultimateworkathomedads.com/</a> [ultimatewo...medads.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Timothy , Here 's an EASY way to minimize the damage of this article : flood Google with MORE articles about you and take over the real estate .
How many pages of Google do people search ?
1 , 2 , MAYBE 3 .
So YOU want to create lots of material which will force the old , static information about you to the END of the line .
How do you do this ?
Create a blog , use your name on it in the " signature " at the end ( as I do on THIS post ) , and keep writing .
If you search MY name , Charles Seymour Jr ( or Charlie Seymour Jr ) you will see that I " own " the first 9 pages or so of search results .
There are MANY thousands of pages ( not all about me ) that come up when a search on my name comes up and I have 8 , 9 , or 10 mentions on each of those first pages .
So , anything from years ago ( being old and not changing , the way a blog changes ) will be forced to back in the Google search .
Voila... THAT is your solution .
And hey , it 's a GOOD one in two ways - ( 1 ) you put out great material about you so when people search about you they find out what you think on one or more topics ( keyword areas ) and ( 2 ) it pushes the damaging material way back .
CURRENT info trumps old , static info every time .
Hope this helps !
Good luck with this !
Charlie Seymour Jr http : //ultimateworkathomedads.com/ [ ultimatewo...medads.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Timothy,

Here's an EASY way to minimize the damage of this article: flood Google with MORE articles about you and take over the real estate.
How many pages of Google do people search?
1, 2, MAYBE 3.
So YOU want to create lots of material which will force the old, static information about you to the END of the line.
How do you do this?
Create a blog, use your name on it in the "signature" at the end (as I do on THIS post), and keep writing.
If you search MY name, Charles Seymour Jr (or Charlie Seymour Jr) you will see that I "own" the first 9 pages or so of search results.
There are MANY thousands of pages (not all about me) that come up when a search on my name comes up and I have 8, 9, or 10 mentions on each of those first pages.
So, anything from years ago (being old and not changing, the way a blog changes) will be forced to back in the Google search.
Voila... THAT is your solution.
And hey, it's a GOOD one in two ways - (1) you put out great material about you so when people search about you they find out what you think on one or more topics (keyword areas) and (2) it pushes the damaging material way back.
CURRENT info trumps old, static info every time.
Hope this helps!
Good luck with this!
Charlie Seymour Jr
http://ultimateworkathomedads.com/ [ultimatewo...medads.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397234</id>
	<title>Lorenzo Von Matterhorn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260453540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Change your name to Lorenzo Von Matterhorn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Change your name to Lorenzo Von Matterhorn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Change your name to Lorenzo Von Matterhorn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399102</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260564840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree.</p><p>You can take this even further, the information about YOU online isn't always about YOU. These days most names can be found more than once, each for a different person.</p><p>Why not use that to your advantage - using anonymous logins write good, neutral and bad things about "fantasy" characters using your name in forums, blogs, etc.</p><p>Then when a potential employeer wishes to Google you - good luck to them in filtering out the "real you" from the fantasy characters<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree.You can take this even further , the information about YOU online is n't always about YOU .
These days most names can be found more than once , each for a different person.Why not use that to your advantage - using anonymous logins write good , neutral and bad things about " fantasy " characters using your name in forums , blogs , etc.Then when a potential employeer wishes to Google you - good luck to them in filtering out the " real you " from the fantasy characters ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.You can take this even further, the information about YOU online isn't always about YOU.
These days most names can be found more than once, each for a different person.Why not use that to your advantage - using anonymous logins write good, neutral and bad things about "fantasy" characters using your name in forums, blogs, etc.Then when a potential employeer wishes to Google you - good luck to them in filtering out the "real you" from the fantasy characters ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394752</id>
	<title>Easy fix</title>
	<author>psyque</author>
	<datestamp>1260441840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Change your name.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Change your name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Change your name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397486</id>
	<title>Not really a good idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260455760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>You can write cease-and-desist letters</i></p><p>Sure, you could do that. Be aware, that lots of webmasters, as you call them, arent really in the habit of giving a care in the world about what your limits on their speech should be.</p><p> <a href="http://www.demystify.info/legal/CandD/jarglaw.html" title="demystify.info" rel="nofollow">Steve Caton</a> [demystify.info]  had an even more clueless lawyer do that exact thing. Now instead of just having his court cases publicly posted on the county website, his name will forever be associated with making threats to remove that same information when someone searches for his name</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can write cease-and-desist lettersSure , you could do that .
Be aware , that lots of webmasters , as you call them , arent really in the habit of giving a care in the world about what your limits on their speech should be .
Steve Caton [ demystify.info ] had an even more clueless lawyer do that exact thing .
Now instead of just having his court cases publicly posted on the county website , his name will forever be associated with making threats to remove that same information when someone searches for his name</tokentext>
<sentencetext> You can write cease-and-desist lettersSure, you could do that.
Be aware, that lots of webmasters, as you call them, arent really in the habit of giving a care in the world about what your limits on their speech should be.
Steve Caton [demystify.info]  had an even more clueless lawyer do that exact thing.
Now instead of just having his court cases publicly posted on the county website, his name will forever be associated with making threats to remove that same information when someone searches for his name</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395936</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260446160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What, you think you're the only one of us who did that search? There's lots of other possibilities, too (JF in '95 and so on); your keywords were too specific. But name-&amp;-shame isn't polite, and this slashdot entry will have a higher search rank than those zines. Quit posting names. Use non-searchable initials or something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What , you think you 're the only one of us who did that search ?
There 's lots of other possibilities , too ( JF in '95 and so on ) ; your keywords were too specific .
But name-&amp;-shame is n't polite , and this slashdot entry will have a higher search rank than those zines .
Quit posting names .
Use non-searchable initials or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, you think you're the only one of us who did that search?
There's lots of other possibilities, too (JF in '95 and so on); your keywords were too specific.
But name-&amp;-shame isn't polite, and this slashdot entry will have a higher search rank than those zines.
Quit posting names.
Use non-searchable initials or something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399866</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>terryducks</author>
	<datestamp>1260532860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>new CEO, they should just ignore the fact that eight years ago<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>
Fuck Yea.  Jerry, Tom, Howard, Sam, John and Richard all know that I supported them on the last round of contracts that will net them about 50 million apiece. It's only fair.  Sam's daughter's sweet sixteen was totally financed by the company - it was a good ROI on the retirement accounts and Richard's ex (that bitch) will get hammered by my lawyer (Tony the shark).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>new CEO , they should just ignore the fact that eight years ago .. . Fuck Yea .
Jerry , Tom , Howard , Sam , John and Richard all know that I supported them on the last round of contracts that will net them about 50 million apiece .
It 's only fair .
Sam 's daughter 's sweet sixteen was totally financed by the company - it was a good ROI on the retirement accounts and Richard 's ex ( that bitch ) will get hammered by my lawyer ( Tony the shark ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>new CEO, they should just ignore the fact that eight years ago ...
Fuck Yea.
Jerry, Tom, Howard, Sam, John and Richard all know that I supported them on the last round of contracts that will net them about 50 million apiece.
It's only fair.
Sam's daughter's sweet sixteen was totally financed by the company - it was a good ROI on the retirement accounts and Richard's ex (that bitch) will get hammered by my lawyer (Tony the shark).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398768</id>
	<title>Re:How common is your name?</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1260472380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If you're "John Smith", I think it will be pretty easy to disclaim being the SAME John Smith...On the other hand, if your last name is "<b>Szczerbiak</b>"...</p></div></blockquote><p>No, because people type "szczerbiak" all the time when banging on the keyboard.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're " John Smith " , I think it will be pretty easy to disclaim being the SAME John Smith...On the other hand , if your last name is " Szczerbiak " ...No , because people type " szczerbiak " all the time when banging on the keyboard .
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're "John Smith", I think it will be pretty easy to disclaim being the SAME John Smith...On the other hand, if your last name is "Szczerbiak"...No, because people type "szczerbiak" all the time when banging on the keyboard.
     
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396738</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1260450060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, maybe his eigenvalue is zero<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... (if you don't get this, look at his user name)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , maybe his eigenvalue is zero ... ( if you do n't get this , look at his user name )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, maybe his eigenvalue is zero ... (if you don't get this, look at his user name)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396324</id>
	<title>Well Timothy...</title>
	<author>Psychotic\_Wrath</author>
	<datestamp>1260447720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would first start by not posting this on slashdot under your name... unless it is "your friend"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would first start by not posting this on slashdot under your name... unless it is " your friend "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would first start by not posting this on slashdot under your name... unless it is "your friend"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396002</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260446400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Things just got much more worse for the poster because now his name has been associated with the article on SlashDot, which has awesome pagerank.  In a day this will be the number one search result for his name.  You just got outed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Things just got much more worse for the poster because now his name has been associated with the article on SlashDot , which has awesome pagerank .
In a day this will be the number one search result for his name .
You just got outed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Things just got much more worse for the poster because now his name has been associated with the article on SlashDot, which has awesome pagerank.
In a day this will be the number one search result for his name.
You just got outed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394422</id>
	<title>Your choices remain</title>
	<author>Deadguy2322</author>
	<datestamp>1260440760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You did it, and you can't undo it. Just do your best to show you have changed, and own your past mistake. I assume it has shaped you as a person, so do not disown it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You did it , and you ca n't undo it .
Just do your best to show you have changed , and own your past mistake .
I assume it has shaped you as a person , so do not disown it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You did it, and you can't undo it.
Just do your best to show you have changed, and own your past mistake.
I assume it has shaped you as a person, so do not disown it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30405196</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260560880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So in response to the question "how do I remove any traces of my name attached to some youthful indiscretions" in a particular location, your response is to post his name AND the details in yet another, far more widely read location.</p><p>You're a dick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So in response to the question " how do I remove any traces of my name attached to some youthful indiscretions " in a particular location , your response is to post his name AND the details in yet another , far more widely read location.You 're a dick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So in response to the question "how do I remove any traces of my name attached to some youthful indiscretions" in a particular location, your response is to post his name AND the details in yet another, far more widely read location.You're a dick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395828</id>
	<title>Wrong strategy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260445740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Keeping a low profile online is stupid. It guarantees that any mention of your name is the bad one. You should have spent years doing stuff with your real name that you wanted people to find so that the old event would be buried. Hell, bury it as if there were multiple people with your name...</p><p>I'd actually hire an SEO and deal with it now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Keeping a low profile online is stupid .
It guarantees that any mention of your name is the bad one .
You should have spent years doing stuff with your real name that you wanted people to find so that the old event would be buried .
Hell , bury it as if there were multiple people with your name...I 'd actually hire an SEO and deal with it now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keeping a low profile online is stupid.
It guarantees that any mention of your name is the bad one.
You should have spent years doing stuff with your real name that you wanted people to find so that the old event would be buried.
Hell, bury it as if there were multiple people with your name...I'd actually hire an SEO and deal with it now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396382</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>rufey</author>
	<datestamp>1260448020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doing a Google search of just the name, the first hit that comes up that mentions the 1995 incident is on the 4th page of 10-per-page search results.  Before that there are a bunch of links about what he's currently doing.

<p>

It would appear that if it is Jesse Hirsh, its somewhat buried already.

</p><p>

And doing the "site:textfiles.com university computer system" search in Google, although the first hit is about Jesse Hirsh, Jesse's name isn't in the blurb shown in the Google search results, so you wouldn't know that the first hit in the search results had anything to do with Jesse Hirsh unless you actually followed the link.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Doing a Google search of just the name , the first hit that comes up that mentions the 1995 incident is on the 4th page of 10-per-page search results .
Before that there are a bunch of links about what he 's currently doing .
It would appear that if it is Jesse Hirsh , its somewhat buried already .
And doing the " site : textfiles.com university computer system " search in Google , although the first hit is about Jesse Hirsh , Jesse 's name is n't in the blurb shown in the Google search results , so you would n't know that the first hit in the search results had anything to do with Jesse Hirsh unless you actually followed the link .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doing a Google search of just the name, the first hit that comes up that mentions the 1995 incident is on the 4th page of 10-per-page search results.
Before that there are a bunch of links about what he's currently doing.
It would appear that if it is Jesse Hirsh, its somewhat buried already.
And doing the "site:textfiles.com university computer system" search in Google, although the first hit is about Jesse Hirsh, Jesse's name isn't in the blurb shown in the Google search results, so you wouldn't know that the first hit in the search results had anything to do with Jesse Hirsh unless you actually followed the link.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396652</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260449580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you will only find the good stuff and hopefully will get bored before they find that one blemish.</p></div><p> In conclusion, an internet search engine is like a karma. The influence of your good karma diminishes the influence of your bad one. Then there are some who are in the need of a search engine Jesus or a teaching session with a broadband Buddha, or a sacrificial visit to a temple of subnet Shiva or a journey in the form of hypertext Hajj, really.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you will only find the good stuff and hopefully will get bored before they find that one blemish .
In conclusion , an internet search engine is like a karma .
The influence of your good karma diminishes the influence of your bad one .
Then there are some who are in the need of a search engine Jesus or a teaching session with a broadband Buddha , or a sacrificial visit to a temple of subnet Shiva or a journey in the form of hypertext Hajj , really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you will only find the good stuff and hopefully will get bored before they find that one blemish.
In conclusion, an internet search engine is like a karma.
The influence of your good karma diminishes the influence of your bad one.
Then there are some who are in the need of a search engine Jesus or a teaching session with a broadband Buddha, or a sacrificial visit to a temple of subnet Shiva or a journey in the form of hypertext Hajj, really.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397504</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260455880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If so, I'm not surprised.  I was going to try practically the same search terms -- just for the challenge -- and then I thought better of it.  "The guy doesn't need the hassle of it showing up on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.", I thought.  The second thing I thought was, "Unfortunately, someone has probably already done this and maybe also posted the results."</p><p>If that's the guy, it was crazy to post this on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. with a specific web site where your indiscretion was mentioned.  You were probably safe without the site, but with it -- wow.  Someone could just crawl the whole site and grep it if Google didn't do the job.  Why on Earth was it necessary to know the site to understand the story or the question you posed?  It wasn't.  I'm really sorry, but the first lesson you need to learn if you don't want it to get spread around is: shut up about it!  The second lesson is: if you must talk about it (it was a good question, after all), be as vague as possible.  There should be <i>nothing</i> beyond the bare minimum needed.</p><p>And if it isn't the guy, look at that stuff anyway.  Where do you think someone could go next with a name in hand?  The warning here is important regardless of whether it's accurate: the web's memory is deep as an ocean, and search engines these days are such that with 15 minutes of searching you could find <i>practically every message in a bottle ever tossed into it</i>.  Google is like having a fishing net the size of the ocean.  It takes a lot more than AC and some vague descriptions to truly anonymize something on the web.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If so , I 'm not surprised .
I was going to try practically the same search terms -- just for the challenge -- and then I thought better of it .
" The guy does n't need the hassle of it showing up on / .
" , I thought .
The second thing I thought was , " Unfortunately , someone has probably already done this and maybe also posted the results .
" If that 's the guy , it was crazy to post this on / .
with a specific web site where your indiscretion was mentioned .
You were probably safe without the site , but with it -- wow .
Someone could just crawl the whole site and grep it if Google did n't do the job .
Why on Earth was it necessary to know the site to understand the story or the question you posed ?
It was n't .
I 'm really sorry , but the first lesson you need to learn if you do n't want it to get spread around is : shut up about it !
The second lesson is : if you must talk about it ( it was a good question , after all ) , be as vague as possible .
There should be nothing beyond the bare minimum needed.And if it is n't the guy , look at that stuff anyway .
Where do you think someone could go next with a name in hand ?
The warning here is important regardless of whether it 's accurate : the web 's memory is deep as an ocean , and search engines these days are such that with 15 minutes of searching you could find practically every message in a bottle ever tossed into it .
Google is like having a fishing net the size of the ocean .
It takes a lot more than AC and some vague descriptions to truly anonymize something on the web .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If so, I'm not surprised.
I was going to try practically the same search terms -- just for the challenge -- and then I thought better of it.
"The guy doesn't need the hassle of it showing up on /.
", I thought.
The second thing I thought was, "Unfortunately, someone has probably already done this and maybe also posted the results.
"If that's the guy, it was crazy to post this on /.
with a specific web site where your indiscretion was mentioned.
You were probably safe without the site, but with it -- wow.
Someone could just crawl the whole site and grep it if Google didn't do the job.
Why on Earth was it necessary to know the site to understand the story or the question you posed?
It wasn't.
I'm really sorry, but the first lesson you need to learn if you don't want it to get spread around is: shut up about it!
The second lesson is: if you must talk about it (it was a good question, after all), be as vague as possible.
There should be nothing beyond the bare minimum needed.And if it isn't the guy, look at that stuff anyway.
Where do you think someone could go next with a name in hand?
The warning here is important regardless of whether it's accurate: the web's memory is deep as an ocean, and search engines these days are such that with 15 minutes of searching you could find practically every message in a bottle ever tossed into it.
Google is like having a fishing net the size of the ocean.
It takes a lot more than AC and some vague descriptions to truly anonymize something on the web.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398684</id>
	<title>pr0n</title>
	<author>Eth1csGrad1ent</author>
	<datestamp>1260471060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>diddums... I'm guessing Pam Anderson and Paris Hilton will be thinking the same thing 30-40 years from now when they're celebrating xmas with the great grand-kiddies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>diddums... I 'm guessing Pam Anderson and Paris Hilton will be thinking the same thing 30-40 years from now when they 're celebrating xmas with the great grand-kiddies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>diddums... I'm guessing Pam Anderson and Paris Hilton will be thinking the same thing 30-40 years from now when they're celebrating xmas with the great grand-kiddies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30404108</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>StillConfused</author>
	<datestamp>1260556440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactamente!

And you can have fun with this. Take a half hour in the evening, hit some random topic sites (gee, did you know there are forums for people who collect antique knitting needles?), make some polite and thoughtful comments. My sole add to the above to is to get a separate gmail or other account so that you don't have your usual accounts drown. What you want is mostly stuff related to your career, but then enough random but interesting, and a good bit of your actual hobbies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactamente !
And you can have fun with this .
Take a half hour in the evening , hit some random topic sites ( gee , did you know there are forums for people who collect antique knitting needles ?
) , make some polite and thoughtful comments .
My sole add to the above to is to get a separate gmail or other account so that you do n't have your usual accounts drown .
What you want is mostly stuff related to your career , but then enough random but interesting , and a good bit of your actual hobbies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactamente!
And you can have fun with this.
Take a half hour in the evening, hit some random topic sites (gee, did you know there are forums for people who collect antique knitting needles?
), make some polite and thoughtful comments.
My sole add to the above to is to get a separate gmail or other account so that you don't have your usual accounts drown.
What you want is mostly stuff related to your career, but then enough random but interesting, and a good bit of your actual hobbies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395664</id>
	<title>Easy..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260445140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am skilled in determining the age levels of adolescent models.</p><p>DAM, resume builder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am skilled in determining the age levels of adolescent models.DAM , resume builder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am skilled in determining the age levels of adolescent models.DAM, resume builder.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376</id>
	<title>welleee</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260440640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Be a man and take responsibility for your actions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Be a man and take responsibility for your actions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Be a man and take responsibility for your actions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396978</id>
	<title>One word - seppuku</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260451620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AFAIK, that is your only option.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AFAIK , that is your only option .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AFAIK, that is your only option.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395336</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one..</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1260443940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It reeks of a good crack IMHO. Simple text magazines used to be the way details of such hacks were distributed. See Phrack as a good example of one still alive.</p><p>Also, what other brand of criminal distributes his techniques to the community and in turn his/her competition? Crackers are pretty unique in this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It reeks of a good crack IMHO .
Simple text magazines used to be the way details of such hacks were distributed .
See Phrack as a good example of one still alive.Also , what other brand of criminal distributes his techniques to the community and in turn his/her competition ?
Crackers are pretty unique in this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It reeks of a good crack IMHO.
Simple text magazines used to be the way details of such hacks were distributed.
See Phrack as a good example of one still alive.Also, what other brand of criminal distributes his techniques to the community and in turn his/her competition?
Crackers are pretty unique in this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398980</id>
	<title>Your True Nature</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260563040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course people have a right to hold it against you. That's who you are. You're best bet is to join the Russian cybercrime mafia! Don't deny your true nature!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course people have a right to hold it against you .
That 's who you are .
You 're best bet is to join the Russian cybercrime mafia !
Do n't deny your true nature !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course people have a right to hold it against you.
That's who you are.
You're best bet is to join the Russian cybercrime mafia!
Don't deny your true nature!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397478</id>
	<title>debating the past</title>
	<author>glebovitz</author>
	<datestamp>1260455700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think arguing about whether or not someone should be given a second chance is not helpful.</p><p>My big question is: If you did this misdeed 15 years ago, what have you done in the past 15 years to distinguish yourself as a reputable and trustworthy individual. The issue isn't whether or not time heals old wounds, but how well you spend your time re-establishing your value to others.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think arguing about whether or not someone should be given a second chance is not helpful.My big question is : If you did this misdeed 15 years ago , what have you done in the past 15 years to distinguish yourself as a reputable and trustworthy individual .
The issue is n't whether or not time heals old wounds , but how well you spend your time re-establishing your value to others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think arguing about whether or not someone should be given a second chance is not helpful.My big question is: If you did this misdeed 15 years ago, what have you done in the past 15 years to distinguish yourself as a reputable and trustworthy individual.
The issue isn't whether or not time heals old wounds, but how well you spend your time re-establishing your value to others.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396414</id>
	<title>Re:Well first...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260448200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is just silly. Time machines are impossible. But, he can accomplish the same thing, by hacking into the internet and re-installing from backups which predate redate edate date ate te e</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is just silly .
Time machines are impossible .
But , he can accomplish the same thing , by hacking into the internet and re-installing from backups which predate redate edate date ate te e</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is just silly.
Time machines are impossible.
But, he can accomplish the same thing, by hacking into the internet and re-installing from backups which predate redate edate date ate te e</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394964</id>
	<title>Mention it in the job interview --  No, really . .</title>
	<author>hduff</author>
	<datestamp>1260442500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Q: Tell us of an accomplishment.</p><p>A: When I was at university, I made a foolish decision and -- insert very brief but accurate description -- and although there were no criminal charges or anything serious, I have regretted it ever since and have used the lessons learned to make the following improvements in my life and the lives of others: blah, blah, blah.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Q : Tell us of an accomplishment.A : When I was at university , I made a foolish decision and -- insert very brief but accurate description -- and although there were no criminal charges or anything serious , I have regretted it ever since and have used the lessons learned to make the following improvements in my life and the lives of others : blah , blah , blah .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Q: Tell us of an accomplishment.A: When I was at university, I made a foolish decision and -- insert very brief but accurate description -- and although there were no criminal charges or anything serious, I have regretted it ever since and have used the lessons learned to make the following improvements in my life and the lives of others: blah, blah, blah.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398316</id>
	<title>Re:Depends</title>
	<author>Grimbleton</author>
	<datestamp>1260465300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the "Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right" files..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the " Two Wrongs Do n't Make a Right " files. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the "Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right" files..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399816</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1260532140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't forget mailing lists.  Google seems to give mailing list archives an unhealthy boost in the search rankings.  Half the search terms I find get the same list post returned from a few dozen different archivers.  If I google for my name, I get a lot of mailing list posts that I've written and each one appears several times in the search results.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget mailing lists .
Google seems to give mailing list archives an unhealthy boost in the search rankings .
Half the search terms I find get the same list post returned from a few dozen different archivers .
If I google for my name , I get a lot of mailing list posts that I 've written and each one appears several times in the search results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget mailing lists.
Google seems to give mailing list archives an unhealthy boost in the search rankings.
Half the search terms I find get the same list post returned from a few dozen different archivers.
If I google for my name, I get a lot of mailing list posts that I've written and each one appears several times in the search results.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396892</id>
	<title>The best way to clear your name?</title>
	<author>pookemon</author>
	<datestamp>1260450960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ctrl-A, Backspace (or Del if you're that way inclined)...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ctrl-A , Backspace ( or Del if you 're that way inclined ) .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ctrl-A, Backspace (or Del if you're that way inclined)...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395154</id>
	<title>Get a new one.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260443280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Face it. You will never get all the stuff off the Internet. That&lsquo;s like filtering packets with a blacklist.</p><p>I heard that in the US it&rsquo;s rather easy to change your name (other than here in Germany, where you have to have a name like Hitler Likestogetraped to get it changed). Use it. Seriously.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>And then don&rsquo;t ever use that new name <em>anywhere</em> on the open Internet. At all. Ever. Period.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Face it .
You will never get all the stuff off the Internet .
That    s like filtering packets with a blacklist.I heard that in the US it    s rather easy to change your name ( other than here in Germany , where you have to have a name like Hitler Likestogetraped to get it changed ) .
Use it .
Seriously. : ) And then don    t ever use that new name anywhere on the open Internet .
At all .
Ever. Period .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Face it.
You will never get all the stuff off the Internet.
That‘s like filtering packets with a blacklist.I heard that in the US it’s rather easy to change your name (other than here in Germany, where you have to have a name like Hitler Likestogetraped to get it changed).
Use it.
Seriously. :)And then don’t ever use that new name anywhere on the open Internet.
At all.
Ever. Period.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398872</id>
	<title>The Skeleton's New Clothes...</title>
	<author>MaxNomad68</author>
	<datestamp>1260474960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To make a long story short, nobody cares.

If you weren't ever prosecuted and the body was never recovered, why would your prospective employer care about the deed? If that job requires a Top Secret Security Clearance and your employer is willing to spend up to $20,000 to do a deep-tissue background check, chances are that brief mention in that silly little zine will be among the last of your worries.

The next thing you should acknowledge that you're not going to be able to erase all traces of yourself and that zine. Aside from being a waste of time pondering it, you don't have the money or resources. There are people who have been trying to erase parts of history since the beginning of civilization. Everybody has at least one sexual encounter in their past that they regret whether it was with a snaggle-toothed woman, confused drunk man or thoroughly startled livestock. That's part of life. Own the f*** up or it will PWN you.

All that said, the real lesson here is to Control Your Press &ndash; and it's never too late to start. Whether through the posting of blogs or articles, it's very possible to generate enough content of your choosing. By putting your name on it, Search Engine spiders will eventually come to embrace those links more than the ones connected to some ancient g-files from the 80s and 90s.

Good luck and next time use protection.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To make a long story short , nobody cares .
If you were n't ever prosecuted and the body was never recovered , why would your prospective employer care about the deed ?
If that job requires a Top Secret Security Clearance and your employer is willing to spend up to $ 20,000 to do a deep-tissue background check , chances are that brief mention in that silly little zine will be among the last of your worries .
The next thing you should acknowledge that you 're not going to be able to erase all traces of yourself and that zine .
Aside from being a waste of time pondering it , you do n't have the money or resources .
There are people who have been trying to erase parts of history since the beginning of civilization .
Everybody has at least one sexual encounter in their past that they regret whether it was with a snaggle-toothed woman , confused drunk man or thoroughly startled livestock .
That 's part of life .
Own the f * * * up or it will PWN you .
All that said , the real lesson here is to Control Your Press    and it 's never too late to start .
Whether through the posting of blogs or articles , it 's very possible to generate enough content of your choosing .
By putting your name on it , Search Engine spiders will eventually come to embrace those links more than the ones connected to some ancient g-files from the 80s and 90s .
Good luck and next time use protection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To make a long story short, nobody cares.
If you weren't ever prosecuted and the body was never recovered, why would your prospective employer care about the deed?
If that job requires a Top Secret Security Clearance and your employer is willing to spend up to $20,000 to do a deep-tissue background check, chances are that brief mention in that silly little zine will be among the last of your worries.
The next thing you should acknowledge that you're not going to be able to erase all traces of yourself and that zine.
Aside from being a waste of time pondering it, you don't have the money or resources.
There are people who have been trying to erase parts of history since the beginning of civilization.
Everybody has at least one sexual encounter in their past that they regret whether it was with a snaggle-toothed woman, confused drunk man or thoroughly startled livestock.
That's part of life.
Own the f*** up or it will PWN you.
All that said, the real lesson here is to Control Your Press – and it's never too late to start.
Whether through the posting of blogs or articles, it's very possible to generate enough content of your choosing.
By putting your name on it, Search Engine spiders will eventually come to embrace those links more than the ones connected to some ancient g-files from the 80s and 90s.
Good luck and next time use protection.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396448</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1260448440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It probably isn't the guy, it isn't really all that likely that the anonymous submitter would truthfully mention textfiles.com and then change "Detailed story I published in a zine" to "friend of mine who went on to mention it briefly in a text file zine".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It probably is n't the guy , it is n't really all that likely that the anonymous submitter would truthfully mention textfiles.com and then change " Detailed story I published in a zine " to " friend of mine who went on to mention it briefly in a text file zine " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It probably isn't the guy, it isn't really all that likely that the anonymous submitter would truthfully mention textfiles.com and then change "Detailed story I published in a zine" to "friend of mine who went on to mention it briefly in a text file zine".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395986</id>
	<title>Jesse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260446340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just read the file and there isn't anything in there that would cause any reasonable person cause to not trust you.</p><p>The only way that would come up is if they were looking to fire you/not hire you anyways.</p><p>My official arrest record is worse then that and it's never hurt me.</p><p>Of course, posting it on Slashdot means you didn't learn anything from the event, or that you are just fishing for attention.</p><p><a href="http://textfiles.com/politics/SPUNK/sp001201.txt" title="textfiles.com" rel="nofollow">http://textfiles.com/politics/SPUNK/sp001201.txt</a> [textfiles.com]</p><p>Now people will be able to more easily find it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just read the file and there is n't anything in there that would cause any reasonable person cause to not trust you.The only way that would come up is if they were looking to fire you/not hire you anyways.My official arrest record is worse then that and it 's never hurt me.Of course , posting it on Slashdot means you did n't learn anything from the event , or that you are just fishing for attention.http : //textfiles.com/politics/SPUNK/sp001201.txt [ textfiles.com ] Now people will be able to more easily find it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just read the file and there isn't anything in there that would cause any reasonable person cause to not trust you.The only way that would come up is if they were looking to fire you/not hire you anyways.My official arrest record is worse then that and it's never hurt me.Of course, posting it on Slashdot means you didn't learn anything from the event, or that you are just fishing for attention.http://textfiles.com/politics/SPUNK/sp001201.txt [textfiles.com]Now people will be able to more easily find it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396644</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>ChienAndalu</author>
	<datestamp>1260449460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep, wash it out. A few years ago, googling my full name pointed to a Usenet post where I was asking for advice on how to take magic mushrooms, ad position one or two. (I accidentally didn't change my profile when typing it or something). I was a little embarrassing but I don't think it had any big consequences.</p><p>Now the first google page lists bug reports, google code projects and my stackoverflow account (and related pages). The mushroom story is now on page 5 or something where I don't really care about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , wash it out .
A few years ago , googling my full name pointed to a Usenet post where I was asking for advice on how to take magic mushrooms , ad position one or two .
( I accidentally did n't change my profile when typing it or something ) .
I was a little embarrassing but I do n't think it had any big consequences.Now the first google page lists bug reports , google code projects and my stackoverflow account ( and related pages ) .
The mushroom story is now on page 5 or something where I do n't really care about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, wash it out.
A few years ago, googling my full name pointed to a Usenet post where I was asking for advice on how to take magic mushrooms, ad position one or two.
(I accidentally didn't change my profile when typing it or something).
I was a little embarrassing but I don't think it had any big consequences.Now the first google page lists bug reports, google code projects and my stackoverflow account (and related pages).
The mushroom story is now on page 5 or something where I don't really care about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394456</id>
	<title>A good way to lower your profile</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260440820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A good way to lower your profile would be to not link to the site in question on a prominent site like Slashdot.  I think you deserve the karma hit for being that stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A good way to lower your profile would be to not link to the site in question on a prominent site like Slashdot .
I think you deserve the karma hit for being that stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A good way to lower your profile would be to not link to the site in question on a prominent site like Slashdot.
I think you deserve the karma hit for being that stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402544</id>
	<title>Why you need to give your children generic names</title>
	<author>CPE1704TKS</author>
	<datestamp>1260550620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Internet and Google cache are forever.  You have no idea who or what could malign your good name.  It might not be you, it could be someone else that posts on a message forum about you.  You have no control over your name anymore.</p><p>The only protection you have is security through obscurity.  I'm blessed with a very, very common name.  That fact, in addition to my early decision in the mid 1990s to never post anything under my real name has made me completely anonymous.  I have about 30 email addresses, each with different uses so that they can't be searched for.  I have several different "personas" that I write under, and I try to maintain different writing style each time, different spelling mistakes, etc.</p><p>This is about the only thing you can do, it's too late for us, but you can keep your children's name generic so they can't be found easily on Google, and to teach them not to be complete dumbasses and do something they will regret forever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Internet and Google cache are forever .
You have no idea who or what could malign your good name .
It might not be you , it could be someone else that posts on a message forum about you .
You have no control over your name anymore.The only protection you have is security through obscurity .
I 'm blessed with a very , very common name .
That fact , in addition to my early decision in the mid 1990s to never post anything under my real name has made me completely anonymous .
I have about 30 email addresses , each with different uses so that they ca n't be searched for .
I have several different " personas " that I write under , and I try to maintain different writing style each time , different spelling mistakes , etc.This is about the only thing you can do , it 's too late for us , but you can keep your children 's name generic so they ca n't be found easily on Google , and to teach them not to be complete dumbasses and do something they will regret forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Internet and Google cache are forever.
You have no idea who or what could malign your good name.
It might not be you, it could be someone else that posts on a message forum about you.
You have no control over your name anymore.The only protection you have is security through obscurity.
I'm blessed with a very, very common name.
That fact, in addition to my early decision in the mid 1990s to never post anything under my real name has made me completely anonymous.
I have about 30 email addresses, each with different uses so that they can't be searched for.
I have several different "personas" that I write under, and I try to maintain different writing style each time, different spelling mistakes, etc.This is about the only thing you can do, it's too late for us, but you can keep your children's name generic so they can't be found easily on Google, and to teach them not to be complete dumbasses and do something they will regret forever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394598</id>
	<title>What Would Joel Do</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would go follow Joel Spolsky's advice. Own your own brand. Make sure good stuff about you is posted, post under your real name, and dilute the bad stuff into oblivion (or at least off the first search page)<br>
<br>
Any "normal" employer is going to give up google searching after the first 20 or 30 good hits. Any employer paranoid enough to require security clearances will find info even if you mange to scrub it off the internet. And if questioned about it, talk honestly about it - you regret it, it was a learning experience, and you have resolved to never do it again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would go follow Joel Spolsky 's advice .
Own your own brand .
Make sure good stuff about you is posted , post under your real name , and dilute the bad stuff into oblivion ( or at least off the first search page ) Any " normal " employer is going to give up google searching after the first 20 or 30 good hits .
Any employer paranoid enough to require security clearances will find info even if you mange to scrub it off the internet .
And if questioned about it , talk honestly about it - you regret it , it was a learning experience , and you have resolved to never do it again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would go follow Joel Spolsky's advice.
Own your own brand.
Make sure good stuff about you is posted, post under your real name, and dilute the bad stuff into oblivion (or at least off the first search page)

Any "normal" employer is going to give up google searching after the first 20 or 30 good hits.
Any employer paranoid enough to require security clearances will find info even if you mange to scrub it off the internet.
And if questioned about it, talk honestly about it - you regret it, it was a learning experience, and you have resolved to never do it again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401242</id>
	<title>Well, whatever you do</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260544620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>, make sure you don't post it on Slashd... oh never mind</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>, make sure you do n't post it on Slashd... oh never mind</tokentext>
<sentencetext>, make sure you don't post it on Slashd... oh never mind</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396828</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260450600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>change your name legally and get a new social security #</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>change your name legally and get a new social security #</tokentext>
<sentencetext>change your name legally and get a new social security #</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260445620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any employer that chooses to judge an employee by good or bad stuff they did 10 years ago, is stark raving insane.</p><p>10 years ago, the person didn't have two children and a spouse and a house with a 30 year mortgage. That kind of change in life status changes people's priorities. 15 years ago she might have been a party animal, with photos on Facebook showing her drunken charades with a bunch of equally sillly friends, these days she might not even touch alcohol since her dedication to her children is more important to her.</p><p>People do change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any employer that chooses to judge an employee by good or bad stuff they did 10 years ago , is stark raving insane.10 years ago , the person did n't have two children and a spouse and a house with a 30 year mortgage .
That kind of change in life status changes people 's priorities .
15 years ago she might have been a party animal , with photos on Facebook showing her drunken charades with a bunch of equally sillly friends , these days she might not even touch alcohol since her dedication to her children is more important to her.People do change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any employer that chooses to judge an employee by good or bad stuff they did 10 years ago, is stark raving insane.10 years ago, the person didn't have two children and a spouse and a house with a 30 year mortgage.
That kind of change in life status changes people's priorities.
15 years ago she might have been a party animal, with photos on Facebook showing her drunken charades with a bunch of equally sillly friends, these days she might not even touch alcohol since her dedication to her children is more important to her.People do change.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396462</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>oldspewey</author>
	<datestamp>1260448500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you will only find the good stuff</p></div><p>This.</p><p>Contribute magazine articles to online publications big and small. Start a blog. Submit comments and letters to mags and journals. Do lots of product reviews. Provide testimonials. Write open letters to local politicians and post them on opinion sites, etc., etc. Treat this as your new part-time job. I guarantee that by next year, that info from 15 years ago will be so far down the google pages nobody will ever get around to seeing it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you will only find the good stuffThis.Contribute magazine articles to online publications big and small .
Start a blog .
Submit comments and letters to mags and journals .
Do lots of product reviews .
Provide testimonials .
Write open letters to local politicians and post them on opinion sites , etc. , etc .
Treat this as your new part-time job .
I guarantee that by next year , that info from 15 years ago will be so far down the google pages nobody will ever get around to seeing it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you will only find the good stuffThis.Contribute magazine articles to online publications big and small.
Start a blog.
Submit comments and letters to mags and journals.
Do lots of product reviews.
Provide testimonials.
Write open letters to local politicians and post them on opinion sites, etc., etc.
Treat this as your new part-time job.
I guarantee that by next year, that info from 15 years ago will be so far down the google pages nobody will ever get around to seeing it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395576</id>
	<title>Capitalize on it</title>
	<author>Vermyndax</author>
	<datestamp>1260444840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why couldn't you capitalize on the situation and when interviews ask about this situation, explain everything with honesty?  Everyone's made mistakes.  Prove to your prospective employer that you know how to recognize your mistakes and learn from them.  Showing this type of integrity should be a plus.  If it's not a plus, you may want to reconsider your desire to work for them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why could n't you capitalize on the situation and when interviews ask about this situation , explain everything with honesty ?
Everyone 's made mistakes .
Prove to your prospective employer that you know how to recognize your mistakes and learn from them .
Showing this type of integrity should be a plus .
If it 's not a plus , you may want to reconsider your desire to work for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why couldn't you capitalize on the situation and when interviews ask about this situation, explain everything with honesty?
Everyone's made mistakes.
Prove to your prospective employer that you know how to recognize your mistakes and learn from them.
Showing this type of integrity should be a plus.
If it's not a plus, you may want to reconsider your desire to work for them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398776</id>
	<title>Wait it out</title>
	<author>Miseph</author>
	<datestamp>1260472560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It might not be of much use right now, but in 10-30 years I have no doubt that online dirt is going to just be assumed by the shot-callers. That's because, in 10-20 years, the people currently in their 20s and 30s will rule the world, and virtually all of these people have grown up with the knowledge that secrets no longer exist.</p><p>Now, if you did something truly malicious or destructive, you might still have some issues, but drunk pictures or evidence of shenanigans will have to be swept under the rug or else *nobody* will be acceptable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It might not be of much use right now , but in 10-30 years I have no doubt that online dirt is going to just be assumed by the shot-callers .
That 's because , in 10-20 years , the people currently in their 20s and 30s will rule the world , and virtually all of these people have grown up with the knowledge that secrets no longer exist.Now , if you did something truly malicious or destructive , you might still have some issues , but drunk pictures or evidence of shenanigans will have to be swept under the rug or else * nobody * will be acceptable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It might not be of much use right now, but in 10-30 years I have no doubt that online dirt is going to just be assumed by the shot-callers.
That's because, in 10-20 years, the people currently in their 20s and 30s will rule the world, and virtually all of these people have grown up with the knowledge that secrets no longer exist.Now, if you did something truly malicious or destructive, you might still have some issues, but drunk pictures or evidence of shenanigans will have to be swept under the rug or else *nobody* will be acceptable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398162</id>
	<title>Does anybody else think that this is insane?</title>
	<author>notdotcom.com</author>
	<datestamp>1260463080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have never even considered this when applying for any job that I've ever had, from entry-level computer tech at a local business to systems admin of a fortune 100 company, to developer for E-commerce solutions, to starting my own company.  I have plenty of my life on the internet, including job applications, old employers, photos, forum posts, videos, etc and I have never been denied any of my previous jobs, which *MIGHT* happen to include all of the above positions.  Even going into something like PCI compliance, I can't imagine someone, or someone's HR department caring, or even thinking of caring.</p><p>If you're trying to get into government contractors, or government security positions requiring a security clearance, then they already know, in a zine or not.  I would make sure that I provided a thorough explanation to even have a hope at passing their screening process.  If you're applying somewhere, let's say Ebay... are they really going to look through your results?  Really?</p><p>The only possible explanation that would make sense is either if the position is a very high level (CXO, President, etc) at a medium to large size company, or into politics and government.  Do you really think that Time Warner knows the google results of a senior level network administrator, or cares?  (Hint, they don't)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have never even considered this when applying for any job that I 've ever had , from entry-level computer tech at a local business to systems admin of a fortune 100 company , to developer for E-commerce solutions , to starting my own company .
I have plenty of my life on the internet , including job applications , old employers , photos , forum posts , videos , etc and I have never been denied any of my previous jobs , which * MIGHT * happen to include all of the above positions .
Even going into something like PCI compliance , I ca n't imagine someone , or someone 's HR department caring , or even thinking of caring.If you 're trying to get into government contractors , or government security positions requiring a security clearance , then they already know , in a zine or not .
I would make sure that I provided a thorough explanation to even have a hope at passing their screening process .
If you 're applying somewhere , let 's say Ebay... are they really going to look through your results ?
Really ? The only possible explanation that would make sense is either if the position is a very high level ( CXO , President , etc ) at a medium to large size company , or into politics and government .
Do you really think that Time Warner knows the google results of a senior level network administrator , or cares ?
( Hint , they do n't )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have never even considered this when applying for any job that I've ever had, from entry-level computer tech at a local business to systems admin of a fortune 100 company, to developer for E-commerce solutions, to starting my own company.
I have plenty of my life on the internet, including job applications, old employers, photos, forum posts, videos, etc and I have never been denied any of my previous jobs, which *MIGHT* happen to include all of the above positions.
Even going into something like PCI compliance, I can't imagine someone, or someone's HR department caring, or even thinking of caring.If you're trying to get into government contractors, or government security positions requiring a security clearance, then they already know, in a zine or not.
I would make sure that I provided a thorough explanation to even have a hope at passing their screening process.
If you're applying somewhere, let's say Ebay... are they really going to look through your results?
Really?The only possible explanation that would make sense is either if the position is a very high level (CXO, President, etc) at a medium to large size company, or into politics and government.
Do you really think that Time Warner knows the google results of a senior level network administrator, or cares?
(Hint, they don't)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400134</id>
	<title>Re:Depends</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1260536220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably just traumatised by words like "burglarizing".  When we were kids, we burgled, and it was good enough for us.  Gah.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably just traumatised by words like " burglarizing " .
When we were kids , we burgled , and it was good enough for us .
Gah .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably just traumatised by words like "burglarizing".
When we were kids, we burgled, and it was good enough for us.
Gah.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394956</id>
	<title>Re:Sucks, hey?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260442500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When "they" finally catch up with some guy that's been burying hookers in the yard for years we often learn about animals they mutilated as a teen and minor sexual offenses.  This guy probably hasn't changed all that much; he just wants to conceal the fact that he's capable of fucking you and everyone that happens to be near you when he gets pissed off decides to teach you a lesson.  This happened at a university, so he wasn't some misguided 8 year old.</p><p>There are lots of places where misanthropes such as yourself can thrive; universities employ many of them.  Acorn isn't terribly picky either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When " they " finally catch up with some guy that 's been burying hookers in the yard for years we often learn about animals they mutilated as a teen and minor sexual offenses .
This guy probably has n't changed all that much ; he just wants to conceal the fact that he 's capable of fucking you and everyone that happens to be near you when he gets pissed off decides to teach you a lesson .
This happened at a university , so he was n't some misguided 8 year old.There are lots of places where misanthropes such as yourself can thrive ; universities employ many of them .
Acorn is n't terribly picky either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When "they" finally catch up with some guy that's been burying hookers in the yard for years we often learn about animals they mutilated as a teen and minor sexual offenses.
This guy probably hasn't changed all that much; he just wants to conceal the fact that he's capable of fucking you and everyone that happens to be near you when he gets pissed off decides to teach you a lesson.
This happened at a university, so he wasn't some misguided 8 year old.There are lots of places where misanthropes such as yourself can thrive; universities employ many of them.
Acorn isn't terribly picky either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395170</id>
	<title>Removing youthful indiscretions from the internet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260443340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's like trying to get pee out of a pool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like trying to get pee out of a pool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like trying to get pee out of a pool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396390</id>
	<title>Do some good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260448020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know most people are saying "sucks for you" and "make noise for the search, so they can't find the bad stuff".<br>How about stopping with the 'keeping a low profile' and actually make a good name for yourself.</p><p>If someone sees what you did in the past, then they can say that at least you've changed as you are currently doing a lot of good.<br>At the moment, they only see the bad you've done as you've kept too low a profile.</p><p>I've done some bad stuff as a kid, but I can say that I've grown up and I'm proud of what I'm doing now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know most people are saying " sucks for you " and " make noise for the search , so they ca n't find the bad stuff " .How about stopping with the 'keeping a low profile ' and actually make a good name for yourself.If someone sees what you did in the past , then they can say that at least you 've changed as you are currently doing a lot of good.At the moment , they only see the bad you 've done as you 've kept too low a profile.I 've done some bad stuff as a kid , but I can say that I 've grown up and I 'm proud of what I 'm doing now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know most people are saying "sucks for you" and "make noise for the search, so they can't find the bad stuff".How about stopping with the 'keeping a low profile' and actually make a good name for yourself.If someone sees what you did in the past, then they can say that at least you've changed as you are currently doing a lot of good.At the moment, they only see the bad you've done as you've kept too low a profile.I've done some bad stuff as a kid, but I can say that I've grown up and I'm proud of what I'm doing now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394566</id>
	<title>What's in a name?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If asked, say it wasn't you.  Done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If asked , say it was n't you .
Done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If asked, say it wasn't you.
Done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397668</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>Maow</author>
	<datestamp>1260457200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Doing a little bit more research shows that Jesse Hirsh is also a contributor to Slash Code:</p></div></blockquote><p>His problems compound exponentially...</p><p>Now the poor bastard will <b>never</b> work again.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/humour</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Doing a little bit more research shows that Jesse Hirsh is also a contributor to Slash Code : His problems compound exponentially...Now the poor bastard will never work again .
/humour</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doing a little bit more research shows that Jesse Hirsh is also a contributor to Slash Code:His problems compound exponentially...Now the poor bastard will never work again.
/humour
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402282</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260549360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That doesn't mean you can't do what the PR agents do: generate higher-profile positive information. That makes it harder to encounter the negative stuff casually. It also changes the balance in the perception of the individual concerned if the negative stuff does also come to light.</p></div><p>This is the best idea.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That does n't mean you ca n't do what the PR agents do : generate higher-profile positive information .
That makes it harder to encounter the negative stuff casually .
It also changes the balance in the perception of the individual concerned if the negative stuff does also come to light.This is the best idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That doesn't mean you can't do what the PR agents do: generate higher-profile positive information.
That makes it harder to encounter the negative stuff casually.
It also changes the balance in the perception of the individual concerned if the negative stuff does also come to light.This is the best idea.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395624</id>
	<title>Re:Use it in the interview..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260445020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, then maybe he is applying for a position as a child pornography cinematographer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , then maybe he is applying for a position as a child pornography cinematographer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, then maybe he is applying for a position as a child pornography cinematographer?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399010</id>
	<title>Re:Not keeping low profile?</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1260563580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better yet, do some volunteer work at several different organizations, and take it upon yourself to get every volunteer published online to rank high on search engines.  Even if you don't put in a lot of volunteer hours, you get lots of good hits, the other volley's stand up for you, and you pad your resume.  Win win win.</p><p>BTW single women sometimes do volunteer work to find nice single guys<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better yet , do some volunteer work at several different organizations , and take it upon yourself to get every volunteer published online to rank high on search engines .
Even if you do n't put in a lot of volunteer hours , you get lots of good hits , the other volley 's stand up for you , and you pad your resume .
Win win win.BTW single women sometimes do volunteer work to find nice single guys ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better yet, do some volunteer work at several different organizations, and take it upon yourself to get every volunteer published online to rank high on search engines.
Even if you don't put in a lot of volunteer hours, you get lots of good hits, the other volley's stand up for you, and you pad your resume.
Win win win.BTW single women sometimes do volunteer work to find nice single guys ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395698</id>
	<title>DNS information?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260445260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm someone who suffers from a problem described in a comment further down, in that my name is rather unique and it used to be incredibly easy to find me on the net.  You can still find me with a simple search, and I'm hoping the old information that used to be there is incredibly hard to find in cache from years ago.  In any case, the only thing you can find so far of me is whois information of my website.  It's a quick jump from there to my website, which is highly "opinionated" to say the least, and has no bearing on my work.</p><p>My question is, what should I do about my site's whois?  It has my full name and address on it.  At the same time, if something goes wrong with my domain I don't want to lose it because my name isn't on it properly.</p><p>Sorry this is probably an old question which might be OT but I didn't think of it until I saw this post and, well, maybe someone else can benefit from it as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm someone who suffers from a problem described in a comment further down , in that my name is rather unique and it used to be incredibly easy to find me on the net .
You can still find me with a simple search , and I 'm hoping the old information that used to be there is incredibly hard to find in cache from years ago .
In any case , the only thing you can find so far of me is whois information of my website .
It 's a quick jump from there to my website , which is highly " opinionated " to say the least , and has no bearing on my work.My question is , what should I do about my site 's whois ?
It has my full name and address on it .
At the same time , if something goes wrong with my domain I do n't want to lose it because my name is n't on it properly.Sorry this is probably an old question which might be OT but I did n't think of it until I saw this post and , well , maybe someone else can benefit from it as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm someone who suffers from a problem described in a comment further down, in that my name is rather unique and it used to be incredibly easy to find me on the net.
You can still find me with a simple search, and I'm hoping the old information that used to be there is incredibly hard to find in cache from years ago.
In any case, the only thing you can find so far of me is whois information of my website.
It's a quick jump from there to my website, which is highly "opinionated" to say the least, and has no bearing on my work.My question is, what should I do about my site's whois?
It has my full name and address on it.
At the same time, if something goes wrong with my domain I don't want to lose it because my name isn't on it properly.Sorry this is probably an old question which might be OT but I didn't think of it until I saw this post and, well, maybe someone else can benefit from it as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397924</id>
	<title>Not enought information</title>
	<author>Stan92057</author>
	<datestamp>1260459540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not enought information<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,how old was he? what did he do? did he do it again? This is why your told your past can hurt you very easly online.When its out, its out forever and that my friends is a very long time<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not enought information ,how old was he ?
what did he do ?
did he do it again ?
This is why your told your past can hurt you very easly online.When its out , its out forever and that my friends is a very long time : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not enought information ,how old was he?
what did he do?
did he do it again?
This is why your told your past can hurt you very easly online.When its out, its out forever and that my friends is a very long time :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397778</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1260458220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Especially going from youth to adulthood.</p><p>If we're going to hold things against people forever, then practically everyone is a bed wetting cookie thief with poor motor skills who has to be told when to go to bed.</p><p>Everyone learns life by trial and error. If we can't accept youthful error then nobody is acceptable. Error might as well be considered part of the very definition of youth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially going from youth to adulthood.If we 're going to hold things against people forever , then practically everyone is a bed wetting cookie thief with poor motor skills who has to be told when to go to bed.Everyone learns life by trial and error .
If we ca n't accept youthful error then nobody is acceptable .
Error might as well be considered part of the very definition of youth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially going from youth to adulthood.If we're going to hold things against people forever, then practically everyone is a bed wetting cookie thief with poor motor skills who has to be told when to go to bed.Everyone learns life by trial and error.
If we can't accept youthful error then nobody is acceptable.
Error might as well be considered part of the very definition of youth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395202</id>
	<title>Re:petty</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1260443460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, most employers are pretty petty these days. Just about any job opening is going to get many, many, many, many, applicants be it cleaning toilets or for a new CEO. Assuming this was a mid-level job, why should they take a risk on this guy rather than give it to some random guy with no record? Its not like there is a shortage of labor these days....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , most employers are pretty petty these days .
Just about any job opening is going to get many , many , many , many , applicants be it cleaning toilets or for a new CEO .
Assuming this was a mid-level job , why should they take a risk on this guy rather than give it to some random guy with no record ?
Its not like there is a shortage of labor these days... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, most employers are pretty petty these days.
Just about any job opening is going to get many, many, many, many, applicants be it cleaning toilets or for a new CEO.
Assuming this was a mid-level job, why should they take a risk on this guy rather than give it to some random guy with no record?
Its not like there is a shortage of labor these days....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395568</id>
	<title>Zip It Next Time</title>
	<author>PalmKiller</author>
	<datestamp>1260444720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1. Don't brag about what you did to your friends, or at least not to the ones stupid enough to use your real name.  Let this be a lesson to you and all your script kiddie buddies, keep your trap shut.

2. Nobody pays attention to anything on textfiles.com, its mostly considered folklore, and most will figure they were bright enough to change their names to protect themselves.

3. Did the post it with your name, address, birthdate, and ssn number?  If not just see #2, ie deny it dumbass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Do n't brag about what you did to your friends , or at least not to the ones stupid enough to use your real name .
Let this be a lesson to you and all your script kiddie buddies , keep your trap shut .
2. Nobody pays attention to anything on textfiles.com , its mostly considered folklore , and most will figure they were bright enough to change their names to protect themselves .
3. Did the post it with your name , address , birthdate , and ssn number ?
If not just see # 2 , ie deny it dumbass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Don't brag about what you did to your friends, or at least not to the ones stupid enough to use your real name.
Let this be a lesson to you and all your script kiddie buddies, keep your trap shut.
2. Nobody pays attention to anything on textfiles.com, its mostly considered folklore, and most will figure they were bright enough to change their names to protect themselves.
3. Did the post it with your name, address, birthdate, and ssn number?
If not just see #2, ie deny it dumbass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397172</id>
	<title>Step 3 is profit.</title>
	<author>TheRon6</author>
	<datestamp>1260453060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What practical steps would your readers recommend to prevent this information from hurting me?</p></div></blockquote><p>

Step 1.  Don't post the story about what happened to you on Slashdot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What practical steps would your readers recommend to prevent this information from hurting me ?
Step 1 .
Do n't post the story about what happened to you on Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What practical steps would your readers recommend to prevent this information from hurting me?
Step 1.
Don't post the story about what happened to you on Slashdot.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398086</id>
	<title>Drown your name on the engine</title>
	<author>javab0y</author>
	<datestamp>1260461640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your biggest mistake is keeping a low profile online.  Your best bet is to get yourself out there as much as possible to drown out those links (unless that text excerpt is a famous issue - then you have a challenge on your hand).  The more you fill up the search engines with "you", the more those files go away.  Good luck.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your biggest mistake is keeping a low profile online .
Your best bet is to get yourself out there as much as possible to drown out those links ( unless that text excerpt is a famous issue - then you have a challenge on your hand ) .
The more you fill up the search engines with " you " , the more those files go away .
Good luck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your biggest mistake is keeping a low profile online.
Your best bet is to get yourself out there as much as possible to drown out those links (unless that text excerpt is a famous issue - then you have a challenge on your hand).
The more you fill up the search engines with "you", the more those files go away.
Good luck.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395344</id>
	<title>Getting something off the internet</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1260443940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is like trying to get pee out of a pool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is like trying to get pee out of a pool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is like trying to get pee out of a pool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394458</id>
	<title>petty</title>
	<author>gsaraber</author>
	<datestamp>1260440820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's 15 years ago, if they hold something minor (no charges were pressed) that happened 15 years ago as the reason for not giving you the job... then you probably weren't going to get it anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's 15 years ago , if they hold something minor ( no charges were pressed ) that happened 15 years ago as the reason for not giving you the job... then you probably were n't going to get it anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's 15 years ago, if they hold something minor (no charges were pressed) that happened 15 years ago as the reason for not giving you the job... then you probably weren't going to get it anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394430</id>
	<title>Let's get him</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260440760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the Make Money Fast spammer!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the Make Money Fast spammer ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the Make Money Fast spammer!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394572</id>
	<title>Don't let it be the most interesting result</title>
	<author>bcmm</author>
	<datestamp>1260441300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do other things that will get your name on search engines. Are you a programmer? Consider volunteering for an awesome open-source project (something people have heard of), so that "John UnfortunatelyUniqueMiddleName Doe added some cool features to AwesomeProject" appears first. They may still read the other stuff, but it will look a lot less like you've spent your whole life doing stupid things to computers, and mean that the advantages of hiring you are presented next to the information that may cause doubt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do other things that will get your name on search engines .
Are you a programmer ?
Consider volunteering for an awesome open-source project ( something people have heard of ) , so that " John UnfortunatelyUniqueMiddleName Doe added some cool features to AwesomeProject " appears first .
They may still read the other stuff , but it will look a lot less like you 've spent your whole life doing stupid things to computers , and mean that the advantages of hiring you are presented next to the information that may cause doubt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do other things that will get your name on search engines.
Are you a programmer?
Consider volunteering for an awesome open-source project (something people have heard of), so that "John UnfortunatelyUniqueMiddleName Doe added some cool features to AwesomeProject" appears first.
They may still read the other stuff, but it will look a lot less like you've spent your whole life doing stupid things to computers, and mean that the advantages of hiring you are presented next to the information that may cause doubt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399194</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>hitmark</author>
	<datestamp>1260522720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in some areas of IT, this kind of publicity have landed people jobs...</p><p>some doors close, others open.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in some areas of IT , this kind of publicity have landed people jobs...some doors close , others open .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in some areas of IT, this kind of publicity have landed people jobs...some doors close, others open.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396802</id>
	<title>What's your name?</title>
	<author>Unnngh!</author>
	<datestamp>1260450420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please post your name here, and we'll all do our best to help...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please post your name here , and we 'll all do our best to help.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please post your name here, and we'll all do our best to help...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395292</id>
	<title>Fiteen years ago, a university computer system...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260443820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>About fifteen years ago, I did something that I've come to regret on a university computer system.</p></div><p>EMACS? Richard is that you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>About fifteen years ago , I did something that I 've come to regret on a university computer system.EMACS ?
Richard is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About fifteen years ago, I did something that I've come to regret on a university computer system.EMACS?
Richard is that you?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395020</id>
	<title>Re:Not keeping low profile?</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1260442800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the UK you can.  It's against human rights and all that, calling people criminals - even if they are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the UK you can .
It 's against human rights and all that , calling people criminals - even if they are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the UK you can.
It's against human rights and all that, calling people criminals - even if they are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395162</id>
	<title>You are "Timothy Lord." Try Googling that, people.</title>
	<author>wernst</author>
	<datestamp>1260443340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It took about 30 seconds with Google to establish that you are Timothy Lord. There's an MP3 I found of you giving a talk where you even identify your Slashdot ID. So we can get that right out of the way.</p><p>Now then.</p><p>I Googled Timothy Lord, Tim Lord, both with and without quotation marks. You know what?</p><p>There are roughly 7 billion (Timothy Lord) and 10 billion (Tim Lord) hits on that name without quotes. It goes down to close to 100,000 hits to 17,000 hits when you add quotes.</p><p>Timothy Lord isn't that uncommon a name. "Tim" and "Lord" by themselves are very common. I have a hard time imagining any employer  going through all those search results when there's not really any way of knowing that the Tim Lord they're reading about doing something somewhere at a university computer some time in the past is the Tim Lord they're interviewing for a job. And even if they did, you could always deny it, unless you're under oath or something, but I guess that's a moral question you only have to think about if they went through the hassle of Googling you and getting this hit to begin with.</p><p>If your name were, oh, "Cornelius Mytzlplyk" I'd say you have a pretty valid concern here. But "Tim Lord?" I don't think so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It took about 30 seconds with Google to establish that you are Timothy Lord .
There 's an MP3 I found of you giving a talk where you even identify your Slashdot ID .
So we can get that right out of the way.Now then.I Googled Timothy Lord , Tim Lord , both with and without quotation marks .
You know what ? There are roughly 7 billion ( Timothy Lord ) and 10 billion ( Tim Lord ) hits on that name without quotes .
It goes down to close to 100,000 hits to 17,000 hits when you add quotes.Timothy Lord is n't that uncommon a name .
" Tim " and " Lord " by themselves are very common .
I have a hard time imagining any employer going through all those search results when there 's not really any way of knowing that the Tim Lord they 're reading about doing something somewhere at a university computer some time in the past is the Tim Lord they 're interviewing for a job .
And even if they did , you could always deny it , unless you 're under oath or something , but I guess that 's a moral question you only have to think about if they went through the hassle of Googling you and getting this hit to begin with.If your name were , oh , " Cornelius Mytzlplyk " I 'd say you have a pretty valid concern here .
But " Tim Lord ?
" I do n't think so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It took about 30 seconds with Google to establish that you are Timothy Lord.
There's an MP3 I found of you giving a talk where you even identify your Slashdot ID.
So we can get that right out of the way.Now then.I Googled Timothy Lord, Tim Lord, both with and without quotation marks.
You know what?There are roughly 7 billion (Timothy Lord) and 10 billion (Tim Lord) hits on that name without quotes.
It goes down to close to 100,000 hits to 17,000 hits when you add quotes.Timothy Lord isn't that uncommon a name.
"Tim" and "Lord" by themselves are very common.
I have a hard time imagining any employer  going through all those search results when there's not really any way of knowing that the Tim Lord they're reading about doing something somewhere at a university computer some time in the past is the Tim Lord they're interviewing for a job.
And even if they did, you could always deny it, unless you're under oath or something, but I guess that's a moral question you only have to think about if they went through the hassle of Googling you and getting this hit to begin with.If your name were, oh, "Cornelius Mytzlplyk" I'd say you have a pretty valid concern here.
But "Tim Lord?
" I don't think so.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394558</id>
	<title>Game the system...</title>
	<author>middlemen</author>
	<datestamp>1260441240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can always game the system. Remember search engines will only find your name if it is indexed. So all you need to do is create a bunch of websites and pages about yourself that are clean and sanitized as per your requirements on websites like LinkedIn, Facebook, MySpace/Twitter, and some interesting blog sites that have high rankings as per ranking systems and high traffic such as Alexa (probably). Perform some search engine optimization on your webpages and profiles such that these sites come in the first page and textfiles.com is pushed back 2-3 pages. No one goes beyond the first page if they find the main stuff in the first few links. Remember that's why Google gave the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button.
<br> <br>Of course, if someone wants to they can find every detail on you, but you can divert them intelligently by using the internet. Think it over.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can always game the system .
Remember search engines will only find your name if it is indexed .
So all you need to do is create a bunch of websites and pages about yourself that are clean and sanitized as per your requirements on websites like LinkedIn , Facebook , MySpace/Twitter , and some interesting blog sites that have high rankings as per ranking systems and high traffic such as Alexa ( probably ) .
Perform some search engine optimization on your webpages and profiles such that these sites come in the first page and textfiles.com is pushed back 2-3 pages .
No one goes beyond the first page if they find the main stuff in the first few links .
Remember that 's why Google gave the " I 'm Feeling Lucky " button .
Of course , if someone wants to they can find every detail on you , but you can divert them intelligently by using the internet .
Think it over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can always game the system.
Remember search engines will only find your name if it is indexed.
So all you need to do is create a bunch of websites and pages about yourself that are clean and sanitized as per your requirements on websites like LinkedIn, Facebook, MySpace/Twitter, and some interesting blog sites that have high rankings as per ranking systems and high traffic such as Alexa (probably).
Perform some search engine optimization on your webpages and profiles such that these sites come in the first page and textfiles.com is pushed back 2-3 pages.
No one goes beyond the first page if they find the main stuff in the first few links.
Remember that's why Google gave the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button.
Of course, if someone wants to they can find every detail on you, but you can divert them intelligently by using the internet.
Think it over.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395250</id>
	<title>Re:The best thing you can do is post on /.</title>
	<author>JWSmythe</author>
	<datestamp>1260443640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Ya..  He didn't give sufficient information.   Something on that site, in or about 1994, with the words (school|college|univeristy) and (FBI/NSA/CIA/DOD/ATF).  and ya, I already ran several searches.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  Too many results without clarification.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    Ya.. He did n't give sufficient information .
Something on that site , in or about 1994 , with the words ( school | college | univeristy ) and ( FBI/NSA/CIA/DOD/ATF ) .
and ya , I already ran several searches .
: ) Too many results without clarification .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    Ya..  He didn't give sufficient information.
Something on that site, in or about 1994, with the words (school|college|univeristy) and (FBI/NSA/CIA/DOD/ATF).
and ya, I already ran several searches.
:)  Too many results without clarification.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395510</id>
	<title>wtf kind of question is this?</title>
	<author>tacokill</author>
	<datestamp>1260444540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned?</i>
<br>
<br>
Uhh, yes.  There is no "right" to a job in the USA.   You can be denied for <b>ANY</b> reason except race, religon, or sexual orientation and those are hard to prove.
<br>
<br>
Why in the world would you think any employer "must" hire someone?  Are you kidding me?   The USA is a hire and fire at-will country and always has been.  It doesn't even make sense to consider whether an employer "must" hire someone they don't want to hire because any employer in their right mind would simply eliminate the position before they would hire someone who is forced upon them.   This isn't France.

<br>
<br>
I kinda-sorta give you a pass because it appears you are Non-US.  I'd only point out that this distinction is one major difference between the USA and the rest of the world.  There is no right to a job in the USA at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned ?
Uhh , yes .
There is no " right " to a job in the USA .
You can be denied for ANY reason except race , religon , or sexual orientation and those are hard to prove .
Why in the world would you think any employer " must " hire someone ?
Are you kidding me ?
The USA is a hire and fire at-will country and always has been .
It does n't even make sense to consider whether an employer " must " hire someone they do n't want to hire because any employer in their right mind would simply eliminate the position before they would hire someone who is forced upon them .
This is n't France .
I kinda-sorta give you a pass because it appears you are Non-US .
I 'd only point out that this distinction is one major difference between the USA and the rest of the world .
There is no right to a job in the USA at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned?
Uhh, yes.
There is no "right" to a job in the USA.
You can be denied for ANY reason except race, religon, or sexual orientation and those are hard to prove.
Why in the world would you think any employer "must" hire someone?
Are you kidding me?
The USA is a hire and fire at-will country and always has been.
It doesn't even make sense to consider whether an employer "must" hire someone they don't want to hire because any employer in their right mind would simply eliminate the position before they would hire someone who is forced upon them.
This isn't France.
I kinda-sorta give you a pass because it appears you are Non-US.
I'd only point out that this distinction is one major difference between the USA and the rest of the world.
There is no right to a job in the USA at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396276</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260447480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I was being accused of breaking into the computer systems at the<br>University Of Toronto for the purpose of publishing "Anarchist<br>newsletters".</p></div><p>
&nbsp; <br>No, no he wasn't. It clearly says that he was accused of unauthorized use of the computer systems.  It's true that the <strong>reason</strong> they went after him so vigorously was the content of the childish crap he was publishing, "ooh, look at teh anarchist, i'm so kool."  But my philosophy is that if I'm going to do something that I know annoys people, I'm not going to piss on their shoes while I'm doing it.<br>
&nbsp; <br>And did the sysadmin, the school's designated administer on that system, have the authority to give the police information about the compromised account? Yes, yes he did.<br>
&nbsp; <br>The text is really funny; he phrased it like he was some cool defender of liberty, instead of the electronic equivalent of a punk stealing supplies to run off fake-revolutionary leaflets on the school's mimeograph.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was being accused of breaking into the computer systems at theUniversity Of Toronto for the purpose of publishing " Anarchistnewsletters " .
  No , no he was n't .
It clearly says that he was accused of unauthorized use of the computer systems .
It 's true that the reason they went after him so vigorously was the content of the childish crap he was publishing , " ooh , look at teh anarchist , i 'm so kool .
" But my philosophy is that if I 'm going to do something that I know annoys people , I 'm not going to piss on their shoes while I 'm doing it .
  And did the sysadmin , the school 's designated administer on that system , have the authority to give the police information about the compromised account ?
Yes , yes he did .
  The text is really funny ; he phrased it like he was some cool defender of liberty , instead of the electronic equivalent of a punk stealing supplies to run off fake-revolutionary leaflets on the school 's mimeograph .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was being accused of breaking into the computer systems at theUniversity Of Toronto for the purpose of publishing "Anarchistnewsletters".
  No, no he wasn't.
It clearly says that he was accused of unauthorized use of the computer systems.
It's true that the reason they went after him so vigorously was the content of the childish crap he was publishing, "ooh, look at teh anarchist, i'm so kool.
"  But my philosophy is that if I'm going to do something that I know annoys people, I'm not going to piss on their shoes while I'm doing it.
  And did the sysadmin, the school's designated administer on that system, have the authority to give the police information about the compromised account?
Yes, yes he did.
  The text is really funny; he phrased it like he was some cool defender of liberty, instead of the electronic equivalent of a punk stealing supplies to run off fake-revolutionary leaflets on the school's mimeograph.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397244</id>
	<title>Change your name</title>
	<author>maggern</author>
	<datestamp>1260453660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Changing your name or adding e.g. a middle name may have the wished effect.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Changing your name or adding e.g .
a middle name may have the wished effect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Changing your name or adding e.g.
a middle name may have the wished effect.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394822</id>
	<title>Re:Not keeping low profile?</title>
	<author>colmore</author>
	<datestamp>1260442080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great the solution is to make life even MORE of a panopticon.</p><p>I kind of hate the future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great the solution is to make life even MORE of a panopticon.I kind of hate the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great the solution is to make life even MORE of a panopticon.I kind of hate the future.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394848</id>
	<title>Wait a minute,,,,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260442140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>How long has Chris Hansen been doing <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To\_Catch\_a\_Predator" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">"To Catch A Predator"</a> [wikipedia.org]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How long has Chris Hansen been doing " To Catch A Predator " [ wikipedia.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long has Chris Hansen been doing "To Catch A Predator" [wikipedia.org]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30407366</id>
	<title>Re:Depends</title>
	<author>inKubus</author>
	<datestamp>1260528120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Glenn Beck called and wants his motive back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Glenn Beck called and wants his motive back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glenn Beck called and wants his motive back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</id>
	<title>Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>mr\_eigenvector</author>
	<datestamp>1260444180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here is the offending file on textfiles.com:
<br> <br>
I found it by doing a search on google for "site:textfiles.com university computer system" and it came up as the first match
<br> <br>
<a href="http://textfiles.com/politics/SPUNK/sp001201.txt" title="textfiles.com" rel="nofollow">The Anarchives</a> [textfiles.com]
<br> <br>
In early march of 1995 I was arrested for "Unauthorized Use Of A Computer". (About 15 years ago)
<br> <br>
I was being accused of breaking into the computer systems at the
University Of Toronto for the purpose of publishing "Anarchist
newsletters".
<br> <br>
---------------
<br> <br>
Doing a little bit more research shows that Jesse Hirsh is also a contributor to Slash Code:
<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.slashcode.com/docs/AUTHORS" title="slashcode.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.slashcode.com/docs/AUTHORS</a> [slashcode.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is the offending file on textfiles.com : I found it by doing a search on google for " site : textfiles.com university computer system " and it came up as the first match The Anarchives [ textfiles.com ] In early march of 1995 I was arrested for " Unauthorized Use Of A Computer " .
( About 15 years ago ) I was being accused of breaking into the computer systems at the University Of Toronto for the purpose of publishing " Anarchist newsletters " .
--------------- Doing a little bit more research shows that Jesse Hirsh is also a contributor to Slash Code : http : //www.slashcode.com/docs/AUTHORS [ slashcode.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is the offending file on textfiles.com:
 
I found it by doing a search on google for "site:textfiles.com university computer system" and it came up as the first match
 
The Anarchives [textfiles.com]
 
In early march of 1995 I was arrested for "Unauthorized Use Of A Computer".
(About 15 years ago)
 
I was being accused of breaking into the computer systems at the
University Of Toronto for the purpose of publishing "Anarchist
newsletters".
---------------
 
Doing a little bit more research shows that Jesse Hirsh is also a contributor to Slash Code:
 
http://www.slashcode.com/docs/AUTHORS [slashcode.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400338</id>
	<title>Make a tsunami of good web content with your name.</title>
	<author>stevegee58</author>
	<datestamp>1260538800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I assume you're trying to counter the so-called "poor man's background check."  i.e. You apply for a job and the hiring manager or HR person googles your name looking for dirt.<br>
<br>
Well, I've thought about this some as a theoretical exercise.  How to remove or obscure negative content on the internet with your name attached?<br>
I call it "extreme makeover: web edition"<br>
<br>
First off, laying low on the internet is the wrong approach.  The result of this is that negative content will be all anyone sees when they google your name.<br>
You need to get proactive and start creating positive content (lots of it) with your name on it.  The beauty of this is that none of this positive stuff has to be true.  After all, who's to know if it's you or another person with the same name?  The same logic applies to that negative information about you.  Who's to say that's really you or someone else?<br>
<br>
Message boards are a good place to start.  Join all sorts of charitable boards using your real name.  Even post some nice things (not necessary).  The search engines routinely scan the major message boards and will pick up your user profile after a while.  The list of content creation ideas goes on and on.<br>
<br>
You'll never succeed in expunging the internet of that negative news with your name on it.  BUT, you can permanently push that web turd to page 10 of the search results.<br>
<br>
The "poor man's background check" I mentioned earlier is really pretty lame if you think about it.  Anyone doing this is doing so knowing they'll potentially get lots of hits from people other than you.  Yet they do it anyway.  This is warfare and you need to counter this threat with your own offensive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I assume you 're trying to counter the so-called " poor man 's background check .
" i.e .
You apply for a job and the hiring manager or HR person googles your name looking for dirt .
Well , I 've thought about this some as a theoretical exercise .
How to remove or obscure negative content on the internet with your name attached ?
I call it " extreme makeover : web edition " First off , laying low on the internet is the wrong approach .
The result of this is that negative content will be all anyone sees when they google your name .
You need to get proactive and start creating positive content ( lots of it ) with your name on it .
The beauty of this is that none of this positive stuff has to be true .
After all , who 's to know if it 's you or another person with the same name ?
The same logic applies to that negative information about you .
Who 's to say that 's really you or someone else ?
Message boards are a good place to start .
Join all sorts of charitable boards using your real name .
Even post some nice things ( not necessary ) .
The search engines routinely scan the major message boards and will pick up your user profile after a while .
The list of content creation ideas goes on and on .
You 'll never succeed in expunging the internet of that negative news with your name on it .
BUT , you can permanently push that web turd to page 10 of the search results .
The " poor man 's background check " I mentioned earlier is really pretty lame if you think about it .
Anyone doing this is doing so knowing they 'll potentially get lots of hits from people other than you .
Yet they do it anyway .
This is warfare and you need to counter this threat with your own offensive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assume you're trying to counter the so-called "poor man's background check.
"  i.e.
You apply for a job and the hiring manager or HR person googles your name looking for dirt.
Well, I've thought about this some as a theoretical exercise.
How to remove or obscure negative content on the internet with your name attached?
I call it "extreme makeover: web edition"

First off, laying low on the internet is the wrong approach.
The result of this is that negative content will be all anyone sees when they google your name.
You need to get proactive and start creating positive content (lots of it) with your name on it.
The beauty of this is that none of this positive stuff has to be true.
After all, who's to know if it's you or another person with the same name?
The same logic applies to that negative information about you.
Who's to say that's really you or someone else?
Message boards are a good place to start.
Join all sorts of charitable boards using your real name.
Even post some nice things (not necessary).
The search engines routinely scan the major message boards and will pick up your user profile after a while.
The list of content creation ideas goes on and on.
You'll never succeed in expunging the internet of that negative news with your name on it.
BUT, you can permanently push that web turd to page 10 of the search results.
The "poor man's background check" I mentioned earlier is really pretty lame if you think about it.
Anyone doing this is doing so knowing they'll potentially get lots of hits from people other than you.
Yet they do it anyway.
This is warfare and you need to counter this threat with your own offensive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395012</id>
	<title>Re:Well first...</title>
	<author>daveime</author>
	<datestamp>1260442740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was the best +10 Funny of the evening. Coffee out of nose, tears in eyes, and sides aching.</p><p>Well played, sir.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was the best + 10 Funny of the evening .
Coffee out of nose , tears in eyes , and sides aching.Well played , sir .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was the best +10 Funny of the evening.
Coffee out of nose, tears in eyes, and sides aching.Well played, sir.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395476</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260444480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I&rsquo;d say:<br>1. Well, you should have though about that some years ago, shouldn&rsquo;t you?<br>2. Be a man, have some balls, and stand by the fact that you did the RHPS.</p><p>Seriously. Why cave to some retards with prejudiced opinions created from seeing some pictures of you on the net? Fuck them!<br>If they think it was what they wanted to do back then, then they should be proud of what they did! Do not act according to others define as cool. Define what is cool, by acting accordingly! (If one ever wants to lead anything, then that rule is a must.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I    d say : 1 .
Well , you should have though about that some years ago , shouldn    t you ? 2 .
Be a man , have some balls , and stand by the fact that you did the RHPS.Seriously .
Why cave to some retards with prejudiced opinions created from seeing some pictures of you on the net ?
Fuck them ! If they think it was what they wanted to do back then , then they should be proud of what they did !
Do not act according to others define as cool .
Define what is cool , by acting accordingly !
( If one ever wants to lead anything , then that rule is a must .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I’d say:1.
Well, you should have though about that some years ago, shouldn’t you?2.
Be a man, have some balls, and stand by the fact that you did the RHPS.Seriously.
Why cave to some retards with prejudiced opinions created from seeing some pictures of you on the net?
Fuck them!If they think it was what they wanted to do back then, then they should be proud of what they did!
Do not act according to others define as cool.
Define what is cool, by acting accordingly!
(If one ever wants to lead anything, then that rule is a must.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400388</id>
	<title>real world problems</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260539220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This has been an issue for politicians and celebrities for a long time now.</p><p>I come from a political family and learned at a very early age to never write anything down I "wouldn't want to share with my mother."  For decades, very powerful people have been struggling with this, and the best solution they have is "don't do anything wrong."  Some of them are morons and get in trouble, but most of them won't use a public bathroom without an employee standing guard.</p><p>And yeah, I'm not using my login here.  That's lesson #2, don't give people reasons to investigate you more than you have to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has been an issue for politicians and celebrities for a long time now.I come from a political family and learned at a very early age to never write anything down I " would n't want to share with my mother .
" For decades , very powerful people have been struggling with this , and the best solution they have is " do n't do anything wrong .
" Some of them are morons and get in trouble , but most of them wo n't use a public bathroom without an employee standing guard.And yeah , I 'm not using my login here .
That 's lesson # 2 , do n't give people reasons to investigate you more than you have to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has been an issue for politicians and celebrities for a long time now.I come from a political family and learned at a very early age to never write anything down I "wouldn't want to share with my mother.
"  For decades, very powerful people have been struggling with this, and the best solution they have is "don't do anything wrong.
"  Some of them are morons and get in trouble, but most of them won't use a public bathroom without an employee standing guard.And yeah, I'm not using my login here.
That's lesson #2, don't give people reasons to investigate you more than you have to.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401694</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260546780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's sexist to use "she" as a stand-in for all people. Not only does it leave out men, but also intersex and others who don't use "he" or "she" to describe themselves. It's much better, if you want to be politically correct, to simply use "they" as a singular pronoun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's sexist to use " she " as a stand-in for all people .
Not only does it leave out men , but also intersex and others who do n't use " he " or " she " to describe themselves .
It 's much better , if you want to be politically correct , to simply use " they " as a singular pronoun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's sexist to use "she" as a stand-in for all people.
Not only does it leave out men, but also intersex and others who don't use "he" or "she" to describe themselves.
It's much better, if you want to be politically correct, to simply use "they" as a singular pronoun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394654</id>
	<title>It has been 20 minutes...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... how come nobody's posted the relevant info on this guy? You guys are slippin'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... how come nobody 's posted the relevant info on this guy ?
You guys are slippin'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... how come nobody's posted the relevant info on this guy?
You guys are slippin'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397570</id>
	<title>You need more stuff on the web</title>
	<author>Blackeagle\_Falcon</author>
	<datestamp>1260456540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I've generally tried to keep a low profile online and until recently there's been very little information about me available from the major search engines."</p><p>This is your problem.  If the only thing about you on the web is this report from fifteen years ago, that's the only thing prospective employers are going to find on Google.  Start a blog, use your real name in discussion groups, write letters to the editor, start a StackOverflow account under your own name (this is my highest ranking Google hit).  You've got to put good stuff about you on the web if you want to drown out the bad stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 've generally tried to keep a low profile online and until recently there 's been very little information about me available from the major search engines .
" This is your problem .
If the only thing about you on the web is this report from fifteen years ago , that 's the only thing prospective employers are going to find on Google .
Start a blog , use your real name in discussion groups , write letters to the editor , start a StackOverflow account under your own name ( this is my highest ranking Google hit ) .
You 've got to put good stuff about you on the web if you want to drown out the bad stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I've generally tried to keep a low profile online and until recently there's been very little information about me available from the major search engines.
"This is your problem.
If the only thing about you on the web is this report from fifteen years ago, that's the only thing prospective employers are going to find on Google.
Start a blog, use your real name in discussion groups, write letters to the editor, start a StackOverflow account under your own name (this is my highest ranking Google hit).
You've got to put good stuff about you on the web if you want to drown out the bad stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30408790</id>
	<title>Real Simple</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260536400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just change your name legally.  Sure it's a bit of a headache but eventually the old, bad stuff will whither on the vine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just change your name legally .
Sure it 's a bit of a headache but eventually the old , bad stuff will whither on the vine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just change your name legally.
Sure it's a bit of a headache but eventually the old, bad stuff will whither on the vine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395096</id>
	<title>Since you are a hacker</title>
	<author>fran6gagne</author>
	<datestamp>1260443040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get in the textfiles.com servers and screw the informations related to you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get in the textfiles.com servers and screw the informations related to you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get in the textfiles.com servers and screw the informations related to you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398390</id>
	<title>Give as a hint</title>
	<author>jdc18</author>
	<datestamp>1260466440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dude tell us what you did.  If it was hacking into a computer, i guess no employer will held that against you, but i think you did something kinky and embarrassing, or just a sent a thread or something stupid from a university.
Just give us a hint, hahahaha.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude tell us what you did .
If it was hacking into a computer , i guess no employer will held that against you , but i think you did something kinky and embarrassing , or just a sent a thread or something stupid from a university .
Just give us a hint , hahahaha .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude tell us what you did.
If it was hacking into a computer, i guess no employer will held that against you, but i think you did something kinky and embarrassing, or just a sent a thread or something stupid from a university.
Just give us a hint, hahahaha.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395210</id>
	<title>Street cred</title>
	<author>itomato</author>
	<datestamp>1260443520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get a job with a company where 'real world' achievement is valued.</p><p>Make yourself a certificate, or spend a few bucks and have a custom trophy made.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get a job with a company where 'real world ' achievement is valued.Make yourself a certificate , or spend a few bucks and have a custom trophy made .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get a job with a company where 'real world' achievement is valued.Make yourself a certificate, or spend a few bucks and have a custom trophy made.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>JesseMcDonald</author>
	<datestamp>1260447600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig. Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.</p></div><p>So when a board of directors is reviewing the candidates for their new CEO, they should just ignore the fact that eight years ago one candidate drove his company into the ground and ran off with all its assets, while another has a spotless record? Face it, history matters. Actual reform and rehabilitation should be considered, but you don't get a free pass just because it's been a few years since your last incident. If <em>you</em> want to take a chance on a candidate with questionable history that's your prerogative, but others retain the right to take that history into account.</p><p>Moreover, all else being equal, a candidate with a known history of embarrassing (or criminal) behavior should expect to lose to a candidate with a clean record. I agree that society should be less sensitive to such things, but it is not unreasonable for employers to prefer candidates who have shown themselves to be conscious of their public image, and thus less likely to harm the company's reputation. If you want to be hired despite your history you must be prepared to justify the heightened risk they are taking by hiring you. (If society were less sensitive then this justification would be easier to make.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>IMHO just as thre 's a 7-year stature of limitations on law , so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig .
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.So when a board of directors is reviewing the candidates for their new CEO , they should just ignore the fact that eight years ago one candidate drove his company into the ground and ran off with all its assets , while another has a spotless record ?
Face it , history matters .
Actual reform and rehabilitation should be considered , but you do n't get a free pass just because it 's been a few years since your last incident .
If you want to take a chance on a candidate with questionable history that 's your prerogative , but others retain the right to take that history into account.Moreover , all else being equal , a candidate with a known history of embarrassing ( or criminal ) behavior should expect to lose to a candidate with a clean record .
I agree that society should be less sensitive to such things , but it is not unreasonable for employers to prefer candidates who have shown themselves to be conscious of their public image , and thus less likely to harm the company 's reputation .
If you want to be hired despite your history you must be prepared to justify the heightened risk they are taking by hiring you .
( If society were less sensitive then this justification would be easier to make .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig.
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.So when a board of directors is reviewing the candidates for their new CEO, they should just ignore the fact that eight years ago one candidate drove his company into the ground and ran off with all its assets, while another has a spotless record?
Face it, history matters.
Actual reform and rehabilitation should be considered, but you don't get a free pass just because it's been a few years since your last incident.
If you want to take a chance on a candidate with questionable history that's your prerogative, but others retain the right to take that history into account.Moreover, all else being equal, a candidate with a known history of embarrassing (or criminal) behavior should expect to lose to a candidate with a clean record.
I agree that society should be less sensitive to such things, but it is not unreasonable for employers to prefer candidates who have shown themselves to be conscious of their public image, and thus less likely to harm the company's reputation.
If you want to be hired despite your history you must be prepared to justify the heightened risk they are taking by hiring you.
(If society were less sensitive then this justification would be easier to make.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397130</id>
	<title>Re:you bet I've had similar concerns</title>
	<author>brian.stinar</author>
	<datestamp>1260452760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Send me a message if you would like to talk about this. I have a few ideas which may be of use, but I have no idea if they are feasible, practical or desirable. Most of the ways that were discussed here with burying things can be automated with custom software (auto form submitters, anyone?) As well as a number of the other suggestions given. I have a small software consulting company, and I am very interested in talking with you (free initial quote) about how custom software may be used to help solve your problem.</p><p>I'm the Brian Stinar with blog posts on software development, not the Brian Stinar with a web page on being an opera singer. You can leave me a comment on my blog, a message on facebook, or check out any of the other forums I'm on.</p><p>Thanks and good luck,</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; -Brian J. Stinar-</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Send me a message if you would like to talk about this .
I have a few ideas which may be of use , but I have no idea if they are feasible , practical or desirable .
Most of the ways that were discussed here with burying things can be automated with custom software ( auto form submitters , anyone ?
) As well as a number of the other suggestions given .
I have a small software consulting company , and I am very interested in talking with you ( free initial quote ) about how custom software may be used to help solve your problem.I 'm the Brian Stinar with blog posts on software development , not the Brian Stinar with a web page on being an opera singer .
You can leave me a comment on my blog , a message on facebook , or check out any of the other forums I 'm on.Thanks and good luck ,       -Brian J. Stinar-</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Send me a message if you would like to talk about this.
I have a few ideas which may be of use, but I have no idea if they are feasible, practical or desirable.
Most of the ways that were discussed here with burying things can be automated with custom software (auto form submitters, anyone?
) As well as a number of the other suggestions given.
I have a small software consulting company, and I am very interested in talking with you (free initial quote) about how custom software may be used to help solve your problem.I'm the Brian Stinar with blog posts on software development, not the Brian Stinar with a web page on being an opera singer.
You can leave me a comment on my blog, a message on facebook, or check out any of the other forums I'm on.Thanks and good luck,
      -Brian J. Stinar-
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260442140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps he has, but depending on the severity of his college mistake, he could find it hard to ever get another job again.  Thanks to the internet's ability to never forget, he's doomed to be repeatedly punished for something he may have already paid for.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps he has , but depending on the severity of his college mistake , he could find it hard to ever get another job again .
Thanks to the internet 's ability to never forget , he 's doomed to be repeatedly punished for something he may have already paid for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps he has, but depending on the severity of his college mistake, he could find it hard to ever get another job again.
Thanks to the internet's ability to never forget, he's doomed to be repeatedly punished for something he may have already paid for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394754</id>
	<title>Consequences</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sucks that your actions have consequences doesn't it?  Those consequences can haunt you the rest of your life... let's here the typical "I didn't know" and we can all pretend it never happened, WRONG!</p><p>If you show some "net worthy" repentance maybe some good stuff will show up along with the bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sucks that your actions have consequences does n't it ?
Those consequences can haunt you the rest of your life... let 's here the typical " I did n't know " and we can all pretend it never happened , WRONG ! If you show some " net worthy " repentance maybe some good stuff will show up along with the bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sucks that your actions have consequences doesn't it?
Those consequences can haunt you the rest of your life... let's here the typical "I didn't know" and we can all pretend it never happened, WRONG!If you show some "net worthy" repentance maybe some good stuff will show up along with the bad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396004</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1260446400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig. Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.</p></div><p>Well the problem is that, because of how the technology works, employers don't really need to dig very deep.  Plug a name into Google, and something embarrassing from 10 years ago may pop up.
</p><p>I'm of the opinion that, as we develop new information technology, we should keep this issue in mind.  In general, we don't seem to be planning for the long-term consequences of how we're using technology.  People in IT sometimes bring up the problem of media, platforms, and formats going obsolete and becoming unreadable, but on the other end of things you have kids posting embarrassing photos of themselves on Facebook.  Yes, it's entirely possible that those photos will never ever go away, and that your only hope is for them to be swallowed a sea of newer and even more embarrassing photos-- that even if they're still there, people won't bother to look for them anymore.
</p><p>I don't know what there is to be done about it.  Maybe institute policies that data generally "expires" and disappears after some set period of time, assuming no particular reason to keep it?  Enforce it by law somehow?  Not only would that be extremely complicated, but you risk losing historically important documents, either through carelessness or because the importance of the documents could only be known in hindsight.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>IMHO just as thre 's a 7-year stature of limitations on law , so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig .
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.Well the problem is that , because of how the technology works , employers do n't really need to dig very deep .
Plug a name into Google , and something embarrassing from 10 years ago may pop up .
I 'm of the opinion that , as we develop new information technology , we should keep this issue in mind .
In general , we do n't seem to be planning for the long-term consequences of how we 're using technology .
People in IT sometimes bring up the problem of media , platforms , and formats going obsolete and becoming unreadable , but on the other end of things you have kids posting embarrassing photos of themselves on Facebook .
Yes , it 's entirely possible that those photos will never ever go away , and that your only hope is for them to be swallowed a sea of newer and even more embarrassing photos-- that even if they 're still there , people wo n't bother to look for them anymore .
I do n't know what there is to be done about it .
Maybe institute policies that data generally " expires " and disappears after some set period of time , assuming no particular reason to keep it ?
Enforce it by law somehow ?
Not only would that be extremely complicated , but you risk losing historically important documents , either through carelessness or because the importance of the documents could only be known in hindsight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law, so too should employers have a limitation on how far back they can dig.
Anything that predates this decade should be irrelevant.Well the problem is that, because of how the technology works, employers don't really need to dig very deep.
Plug a name into Google, and something embarrassing from 10 years ago may pop up.
I'm of the opinion that, as we develop new information technology, we should keep this issue in mind.
In general, we don't seem to be planning for the long-term consequences of how we're using technology.
People in IT sometimes bring up the problem of media, platforms, and formats going obsolete and becoming unreadable, but on the other end of things you have kids posting embarrassing photos of themselves on Facebook.
Yes, it's entirely possible that those photos will never ever go away, and that your only hope is for them to be swallowed a sea of newer and even more embarrassing photos-- that even if they're still there, people won't bother to look for them anymore.
I don't know what there is to be done about it.
Maybe institute policies that data generally "expires" and disappears after some set period of time, assuming no particular reason to keep it?
Enforce it by law somehow?
Not only would that be extremely complicated, but you risk losing historically important documents, either through carelessness or because the importance of the documents could only be known in hindsight.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396054</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260446640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sORRY i aM uSING wINODWS tO rEPLY...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sORRY i aM uSING wINODWS tO rEPLY.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sORRY i aM uSING wINODWS tO rEPLY...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394424</id>
	<title>Why bother?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260440760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless you have an incredibly unique name, you simply say, "I have no idea who that was, but it wasn't me".  There is no other identifying informaton or anything else like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless you have an incredibly unique name , you simply say , " I have no idea who that was , but it was n't me " .
There is no other identifying informaton or anything else like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless you have an incredibly unique name, you simply say, "I have no idea who that was, but it wasn't me".
There is no other identifying informaton or anything else like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30438212</id>
	<title>Backup Copy, Just In Case</title>
	<author>nlindstrom</author>
	<datestamp>1260798120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In early march of 1995 I was arrested for "Unauthorized Use Of A Computer".</p><p>Three large, white, plain-clothes detectives from 52 division in downtown<br>toronto came to my house, promptly arrested me, took me to a holding<br>cell, and conducted a strip search (looking for codes I guess). I was<br>held in custody for four hours (7:30 pm to 11:30 pm), and released as a<br>result of substantial protest made by friends and family at the sergeants<br>desk.</p><p>I was being accused of breaking into the computer systems at the<br>University Of Toronto for the purpose of publishing "Anarchist<br>newsletters".</p><p>The sysadmin of ecf.utoronto.ca, one Professor Jack Gorrie<br>, saw someone on his system publishing Anarchist<br>materials, assumed I was a malicious "hacker", turned over all records of<br>my email, news posts, key strokes, you name it, to the police at 52<br>division. The police realizing how dangerous these "hacker anarchist"<br>types are, had to come to my house to cuff me, bring me down, and strip<br>search me.</p><p>All because I was using my brother and his friends' account. I was new to<br>the Internet, and naively felt I had freedom of speech.</p><p>Turns out that freedom, like freedom in the real world, must be<br>authorized. Although my brother and his friend had no problem with my<br>using the account, they of course are not the recognized "authorities".<br>Only Jack Gorrie , the system administrator, has<br>system authority. And good ole Jack, like many engineers, doens't like<br>Anarchists.</p><p>Instantly I learned the total lack of privacy (without encryption that<br>is) on the Internet, and the simplicity of complete electronic surveillance.</p><p>All my actions were turned over to the police, a stack of papers six<br>inches thick. And of course this was their copy to keep.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>I was to face trial for a possible six months in prison, just for<br>exercising my democratic rights and responsibilities.</p><p>Of course the end result was that the charges were dropped, although this<br>was not until several months later (sept 7, 95), after several<br>appearances in court, and after my agreeing to pay $400 to the skule.</p><p>But nevertheless, this incident was indicative of a lot of emerging<br>trends in our so-called information-highway:</p><p>1. What right do Sysadmins have in turning our shit over to the cops?</p><p>2. If there are "authorities" on the Internet, then clearly it's not an<br>example of anarchy, which of course implies no authorities.</p><p>3. Where does the role of democracy fall within the practice of<br>electronic surveillance? Did I have any rights in the first place?</p><p>4. Who enforces University regulations; the University? or the cops?</p><p>I could have raised a lot of shit by dropping this publicly months ago<br>when it was all going on, but to be honest I was scared shitless.<br>I didn't want to be a guinea-pig for a law that had yet to make it to a<br>court of law.<br>My life had been thrusted into the public realm, and I was desperate to<br>get it back.</p><p>Fortunately I have good friends and family, who knew a good activist<br>lawyer who was dedicated to keeping my ass clean.</p><p>It's also worth noting that my brother, who at the time was completing<br>his master's degree at an amerikkkan engineering lab was investigated by<br>the FBI, upon prompting by the Toronto police. The FBI obviously found<br>nothing wrong, but again, hastle where it should not have been.</p><p>I could go on ranting about many of the other socio-political<br>implications of these actions, but the purpose of this piece is merely to<br>inform.</p><p>Included in this message is a legal-summary of the case etc., written by<br>friends of mine in LoGIC (Legal group for the Internet in Canada). Any<br>other enquiries or what have you can be directed to me at jesse@lglobal.com</p><p>--Jesse Hirsh</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In early march of 1995 I was arrested for " Unauthorized Use Of A Computer " .Three large , white , plain-clothes detectives from 52 division in downtowntoronto came to my house , promptly arrested me , took me to a holdingcell , and conducted a strip search ( looking for codes I guess ) .
I washeld in custody for four hours ( 7 : 30 pm to 11 : 30 pm ) , and released as aresult of substantial protest made by friends and family at the sergeantsdesk.I was being accused of breaking into the computer systems at theUniversity Of Toronto for the purpose of publishing " Anarchistnewsletters " .The sysadmin of ecf.utoronto.ca , one Professor Jack Gorrie , saw someone on his system publishing Anarchistmaterials , assumed I was a malicious " hacker " , turned over all records ofmy email , news posts , key strokes , you name it , to the police at 52division .
The police realizing how dangerous these " hacker anarchist " types are , had to come to my house to cuff me , bring me down , and stripsearch me.All because I was using my brother and his friends ' account .
I was new tothe Internet , and naively felt I had freedom of speech.Turns out that freedom , like freedom in the real world , must beauthorized .
Although my brother and his friend had no problem with myusing the account , they of course are not the recognized " authorities " .Only Jack Gorrie , the system administrator , hassystem authority .
And good ole Jack , like many engineers , doens't likeAnarchists.Instantly I learned the total lack of privacy ( without encryption thatis ) on the Internet , and the simplicity of complete electronic surveillance.All my actions were turned over to the police , a stack of papers sixinches thick .
And of course this was their copy to keep .
; ) I was to face trial for a possible six months in prison , just forexercising my democratic rights and responsibilities.Of course the end result was that the charges were dropped , although thiswas not until several months later ( sept 7 , 95 ) , after severalappearances in court , and after my agreeing to pay $ 400 to the skule.But nevertheless , this incident was indicative of a lot of emergingtrends in our so-called information-highway : 1 .
What right do Sysadmins have in turning our shit over to the cops ? 2 .
If there are " authorities " on the Internet , then clearly it 's not anexample of anarchy , which of course implies no authorities.3 .
Where does the role of democracy fall within the practice ofelectronic surveillance ?
Did I have any rights in the first place ? 4 .
Who enforces University regulations ; the University ?
or the cops ? I could have raised a lot of shit by dropping this publicly months agowhen it was all going on , but to be honest I was scared shitless.I did n't want to be a guinea-pig for a law that had yet to make it to acourt of law.My life had been thrusted into the public realm , and I was desperate toget it back.Fortunately I have good friends and family , who knew a good activistlawyer who was dedicated to keeping my ass clean.It 's also worth noting that my brother , who at the time was completinghis master 's degree at an amerikkkan engineering lab was investigated bythe FBI , upon prompting by the Toronto police .
The FBI obviously foundnothing wrong , but again , hastle where it should not have been.I could go on ranting about many of the other socio-politicalimplications of these actions , but the purpose of this piece is merely toinform.Included in this message is a legal-summary of the case etc. , written byfriends of mine in LoGIC ( Legal group for the Internet in Canada ) .
Anyother enquiries or what have you can be directed to me at jesse @ lglobal.com--Jesse Hirsh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In early march of 1995 I was arrested for "Unauthorized Use Of A Computer".Three large, white, plain-clothes detectives from 52 division in downtowntoronto came to my house, promptly arrested me, took me to a holdingcell, and conducted a strip search (looking for codes I guess).
I washeld in custody for four hours (7:30 pm to 11:30 pm), and released as aresult of substantial protest made by friends and family at the sergeantsdesk.I was being accused of breaking into the computer systems at theUniversity Of Toronto for the purpose of publishing "Anarchistnewsletters".The sysadmin of ecf.utoronto.ca, one Professor Jack Gorrie, saw someone on his system publishing Anarchistmaterials, assumed I was a malicious "hacker", turned over all records ofmy email, news posts, key strokes, you name it, to the police at 52division.
The police realizing how dangerous these "hacker anarchist"types are, had to come to my house to cuff me, bring me down, and stripsearch me.All because I was using my brother and his friends' account.
I was new tothe Internet, and naively felt I had freedom of speech.Turns out that freedom, like freedom in the real world, must beauthorized.
Although my brother and his friend had no problem with myusing the account, they of course are not the recognized "authorities".Only Jack Gorrie , the system administrator, hassystem authority.
And good ole Jack, like many engineers, doens't likeAnarchists.Instantly I learned the total lack of privacy (without encryption thatis) on the Internet, and the simplicity of complete electronic surveillance.All my actions were turned over to the police, a stack of papers sixinches thick.
And of course this was their copy to keep.
;)I was to face trial for a possible six months in prison, just forexercising my democratic rights and responsibilities.Of course the end result was that the charges were dropped, although thiswas not until several months later (sept 7, 95), after severalappearances in court, and after my agreeing to pay $400 to the skule.But nevertheless, this incident was indicative of a lot of emergingtrends in our so-called information-highway:1.
What right do Sysadmins have in turning our shit over to the cops?2.
If there are "authorities" on the Internet, then clearly it's not anexample of anarchy, which of course implies no authorities.3.
Where does the role of democracy fall within the practice ofelectronic surveillance?
Did I have any rights in the first place?4.
Who enforces University regulations; the University?
or the cops?I could have raised a lot of shit by dropping this publicly months agowhen it was all going on, but to be honest I was scared shitless.I didn't want to be a guinea-pig for a law that had yet to make it to acourt of law.My life had been thrusted into the public realm, and I was desperate toget it back.Fortunately I have good friends and family, who knew a good activistlawyer who was dedicated to keeping my ass clean.It's also worth noting that my brother, who at the time was completinghis master's degree at an amerikkkan engineering lab was investigated bythe FBI, upon prompting by the Toronto police.
The FBI obviously foundnothing wrong, but again, hastle where it should not have been.I could go on ranting about many of the other socio-politicalimplications of these actions, but the purpose of this piece is merely toinform.Included in this message is a legal-summary of the case etc., written byfriends of mine in LoGIC (Legal group for the Internet in Canada).
Anyother enquiries or what have you can be directed to me at jesse@lglobal.com--Jesse Hirsh</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394712</id>
	<title>Re:How common is your name?</title>
	<author>daveime</author>
	<datestamp>1260441720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My father's name is NOT Walter, and I've never been to Spain, you insensitive clod.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My father 's name is NOT Walter , and I 've never been to Spain , you insensitive clod .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My father's name is NOT Walter, and I've never been to Spain, you insensitive clod.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394516</id>
	<title>The best thing you can do is post on /.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You just awoke a sleeping giant.  As we speak thousands of once idle keyboards are feverishly trying away to unravel the mystery of just who you are and what you did - you even told them where to look.  How fond were you of your name?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You just awoke a sleeping giant .
As we speak thousands of once idle keyboards are feverishly trying away to unravel the mystery of just who you are and what you did - you even told them where to look .
How fond were you of your name ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just awoke a sleeping giant.
As we speak thousands of once idle keyboards are feverishly trying away to unravel the mystery of just who you are and what you did - you even told them where to look.
How fond were you of your name?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398292</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>adolf</author>
	<datestamp>1260465060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow.  Just, wow.</p><p>Look at all those people telling you what a dickhead you are for refusing to delete your own work.</p><p>I'm amazed, as prolific as the Slashdot crowd tends to be in their favoritism toward openness and information sharing at any expense, that these same truth-loving geeks turn so hypocritical over a few pictures that they're not even involved with.</p><p>You'd think that they'd understand just what the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical\_revisionism\_(negationism)#Literary\_historical\_revisionism" title="wikipedia.org">implications</a> [wikipedia.org] are of revising history.  Alas.</p><p>Keep it up.  Just because someone did something in the past (whether for fun, sport, eroticism, criminal intent, or whatever), regrets it now, and wants to wash it all away, does not somehow compel another free man to do <i>anything</i> about it.</p><p>If it did, we'd be living in a very different world right now, with every journalist, blogger, photographer, and webmaster busily rewriting history, <i>pro bono</i>, for anyone who has a problem with the past.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
Just , wow.Look at all those people telling you what a dickhead you are for refusing to delete your own work.I 'm amazed , as prolific as the Slashdot crowd tends to be in their favoritism toward openness and information sharing at any expense , that these same truth-loving geeks turn so hypocritical over a few pictures that they 're not even involved with.You 'd think that they 'd understand just what the implications [ wikipedia.org ] are of revising history .
Alas.Keep it up .
Just because someone did something in the past ( whether for fun , sport , eroticism , criminal intent , or whatever ) , regrets it now , and wants to wash it all away , does not somehow compel another free man to do anything about it.If it did , we 'd be living in a very different world right now , with every journalist , blogger , photographer , and webmaster busily rewriting history , pro bono , for anyone who has a problem with the past .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
Just, wow.Look at all those people telling you what a dickhead you are for refusing to delete your own work.I'm amazed, as prolific as the Slashdot crowd tends to be in their favoritism toward openness and information sharing at any expense, that these same truth-loving geeks turn so hypocritical over a few pictures that they're not even involved with.You'd think that they'd understand just what the implications [wikipedia.org] are of revising history.
Alas.Keep it up.
Just because someone did something in the past (whether for fun, sport, eroticism, criminal intent, or whatever), regrets it now, and wants to wash it all away, does not somehow compel another free man to do anything about it.If it did, we'd be living in a very different world right now, with every journalist, blogger, photographer, and webmaster busily rewriting history, pro bono, for anyone who has a problem with the past.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396722</id>
	<title>Re:Use it in the interview..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260449940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, but if you believe that the days of the "hack/phreak/anarchy" died with the phone/modem BBS.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Well sir, you have not been paying attention.</p><p>In reality most electronic related crime skills are in high demand<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and most of the characters matching the above descriptions you provided are either:</p><p>- in good jobs<br>- still in jail<br>- unemployable for unrelated reasons</p><p>BTW: Please support the "free the hackers from gitmo" charity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but if you believe that the days of the " hack/phreak/anarchy " died with the phone/modem BBS .
... Well sir , you have not been paying attention.In reality most electronic related crime skills are in high demand ... and most of the characters matching the above descriptions you provided are either : - in good jobs- still in jail- unemployable for unrelated reasonsBTW : Please support the " free the hackers from gitmo " charity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but if you believe that the days of the "hack/phreak/anarchy" died with the phone/modem BBS.
... Well sir, you have not been paying attention.In reality most electronic related crime skills are in high demand ... and most of the characters matching the above descriptions you provided are either:- in good jobs- still in jail- unemployable for unrelated reasonsBTW: Please support the "free the hackers from gitmo" charity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396384</id>
	<title>Funny thought</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260448020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering that you already spoke with the guy that runs textfiles.com, he knows who you are, what the issue is, and what your name is.</p><p>I think it would be pretty funny if he came on here and posted some details.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering that you already spoke with the guy that runs textfiles.com , he knows who you are , what the issue is , and what your name is.I think it would be pretty funny if he came on here and posted some details .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering that you already spoke with the guy that runs textfiles.com, he knows who you are, what the issue is, and what your name is.I think it would be pretty funny if he came on here and posted some details.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398414</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Corbets</author>
	<datestamp>1260466740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Any employer that chooses to judge an employee by good or bad stuff they did 10 years ago, is stark raving insane.</p></div><p>Let's say that 10 years ago, you got upset at your boss and wiped out all the financial data on his system.</p><p>I'm not going to hire you for anything to do with IT now if I find that out, that's a fact. Sorry, but while some people do change, others don't.</p><p>People need to wake up and realize that actions have consequences, and I personally think that we "nerds", with our less enhanced social abilities, are very poor at understanding that. It's crap sometimes, but it's life.</p><p>That said, I personally agree with your example about the Facebook photos, and would take it a step further saying that I'd actually prefer to hire someone who has a little fun in his or her life.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any employer that chooses to judge an employee by good or bad stuff they did 10 years ago , is stark raving insane.Let 's say that 10 years ago , you got upset at your boss and wiped out all the financial data on his system.I 'm not going to hire you for anything to do with IT now if I find that out , that 's a fact .
Sorry , but while some people do change , others do n't.People need to wake up and realize that actions have consequences , and I personally think that we " nerds " , with our less enhanced social abilities , are very poor at understanding that .
It 's crap sometimes , but it 's life.That said , I personally agree with your example about the Facebook photos , and would take it a step further saying that I 'd actually prefer to hire someone who has a little fun in his or her life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any employer that chooses to judge an employee by good or bad stuff they did 10 years ago, is stark raving insane.Let's say that 10 years ago, you got upset at your boss and wiped out all the financial data on his system.I'm not going to hire you for anything to do with IT now if I find that out, that's a fact.
Sorry, but while some people do change, others don't.People need to wake up and realize that actions have consequences, and I personally think that we "nerds", with our less enhanced social abilities, are very poor at understanding that.
It's crap sometimes, but it's life.That said, I personally agree with your example about the Facebook photos, and would take it a step further saying that I'd actually prefer to hire someone who has a little fun in his or her life.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394604</id>
	<title>If interviewed by Federal law enforcement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Offer to help them steal a universal decryption chip. And grow some dreamy blue eyes, feathered hair and side burns to die for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Offer to help them steal a universal decryption chip .
And grow some dreamy blue eyes , feathered hair and side burns to die for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Offer to help them steal a universal decryption chip.
And grow some dreamy blue eyes, feathered hair and side burns to die for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378</id>
	<title>Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260440640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once its on the net, its on the net.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once its on the net , its on the net .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once its on the net, its on the net.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396614</id>
	<title>Re:Suicide is your only realistic option</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260449280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>Quantum</em> suicide is a better option. Just make a suicide mechanism which is triggered if all the information does not vanish. Since the probability of all that information vanishing e.g. due to some cosmic radiation particles flipping enough bits that none of it is accessible any more, while negligible for all normal purposes, is not exactly zero, if MWI is right, he will then experience the vanishing of the information immediately with certainty. If MWI is wrong, it's no worse than normal suicide.</p><p>If he wants to make sure that the information vanishes for everyone, he'll need to make a doomsday device triggered on the non-vanishing of the information. This would make sure that the information will vanish - either through the improbable erasure process, or by just being destroyed together with the earth by the doomsday device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quantum suicide is a better option .
Just make a suicide mechanism which is triggered if all the information does not vanish .
Since the probability of all that information vanishing e.g .
due to some cosmic radiation particles flipping enough bits that none of it is accessible any more , while negligible for all normal purposes , is not exactly zero , if MWI is right , he will then experience the vanishing of the information immediately with certainty .
If MWI is wrong , it 's no worse than normal suicide.If he wants to make sure that the information vanishes for everyone , he 'll need to make a doomsday device triggered on the non-vanishing of the information .
This would make sure that the information will vanish - either through the improbable erasure process , or by just being destroyed together with the earth by the doomsday device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quantum suicide is a better option.
Just make a suicide mechanism which is triggered if all the information does not vanish.
Since the probability of all that information vanishing e.g.
due to some cosmic radiation particles flipping enough bits that none of it is accessible any more, while negligible for all normal purposes, is not exactly zero, if MWI is right, he will then experience the vanishing of the information immediately with certainty.
If MWI is wrong, it's no worse than normal suicide.If he wants to make sure that the information vanishes for everyone, he'll need to make a doomsday device triggered on the non-vanishing of the information.
This would make sure that the information will vanish - either through the improbable erasure process, or by just being destroyed together with the earth by the doomsday device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395198</id>
	<title>I think I have a solution</title>
	<author>hyades1</author>
	<datestamp>1260443460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> You could always change your name.  Might I suggest Mike Hawke, Miles O'Toole or Haywood Jablome as possibilities? </p><p> Just trying to help. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could always change your name .
Might I suggest Mike Hawke , Miles O'Toole or Haywood Jablome as possibilities ?
Just trying to help .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> You could always change your name.
Might I suggest Mike Hawke, Miles O'Toole or Haywood Jablome as possibilities?
Just trying to help. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396472</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>spleen\_blender</author>
	<datestamp>1260448500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or you could bury it with so much similar BAD stuff so that none of it is believable.
<br> <br>
Noise up, signal down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or you could bury it with so much similar BAD stuff so that none of it is believable .
Noise up , signal down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or you could bury it with so much similar BAD stuff so that none of it is believable.
Noise up, signal down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395954</id>
	<title>shouldn't have talked to your friends</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1260446220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doing it wasn't the problem it was talking about it. Now, unfortunately it's going to be around for a long time. I doubt too many people are actually likely to stumble across it. If they do, just be honest and say you were young and stupid and have grow up a lot since then.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Doing it was n't the problem it was talking about it .
Now , unfortunately it 's going to be around for a long time .
I doubt too many people are actually likely to stumble across it .
If they do , just be honest and say you were young and stupid and have grow up a lot since then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doing it wasn't the problem it was talking about it.
Now, unfortunately it's going to be around for a long time.
I doubt too many people are actually likely to stumble across it.
If they do, just be honest and say you were young and stupid and have grow up a lot since then.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396558</id>
	<title>Re:Not possible anymore</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1260448980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem is that most employers won't ask.  That opens up kegs of worms that they don't need to - instead, they see your resume, google your name, and into the circular file you go. No fuss.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is that most employers wo n't ask .
That opens up kegs of worms that they do n't need to - instead , they see your resume , google your name , and into the circular file you go .
No fuss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is that most employers won't ask.
That opens up kegs of worms that they don't need to - instead, they see your resume, google your name, and into the circular file you go.
No fuss.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397014</id>
	<title>Re:Fiteen years ago, a university computer system.</title>
	<author>meowhous</author>
	<datestamp>1260451740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That was A LOT longer ago than 15 years--more like 33.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That was A LOT longer ago than 15 years--more like 33 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was A LOT longer ago than 15 years--more like 33.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399654</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260529260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...or alternatively just don't sweat about not getting jobs where the employers are a bunch of cockends when there are plenty of good employers out there if you're a smart hard working guy. Even in the recession with high unemployment I've not met any competent people out of work for more than a few months when made redundant, the long term unemployed are generally the incompetent and/or lazy.</p><p>Sorry, was that too pragmatic<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;) ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...or alternatively just do n't sweat about not getting jobs where the employers are a bunch of cockends when there are plenty of good employers out there if you 're a smart hard working guy .
Even in the recession with high unemployment I 've not met any competent people out of work for more than a few months when made redundant , the long term unemployed are generally the incompetent and/or lazy.Sorry , was that too pragmatic ; ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...or alternatively just don't sweat about not getting jobs where the employers are a bunch of cockends when there are plenty of good employers out there if you're a smart hard working guy.
Even in the recession with high unemployment I've not met any competent people out of work for more than a few months when made redundant, the long term unemployed are generally the incompetent and/or lazy.Sorry, was that too pragmatic ;) ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398236</id>
	<title>Dumbass</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260464220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>LOL DumbAss all ya had to do was stfu now ya made me look

199* university computer  Federal law enforcement agency no charges  text file zine  site:http://www.textfiles.com
 LOL DUMBASS</htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL DumbAss all ya had to do was stfu now ya made me look 199 * university computer Federal law enforcement agency no charges text file zine site : http : //www.textfiles.com LOL DUMBASS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL DumbAss all ya had to do was stfu now ya made me look

199* university computer  Federal law enforcement agency no charges  text file zine  site:http://www.textfiles.com
 LOL DUMBASS</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395912</id>
	<title>Re:smokescreen</title>
	<author>luther349</author>
	<datestamp>1260446100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>no its not but they do anyways. they will just make up a different reason or just not contact you again. i get it alot being i have a skin issue and a disibalty i work with. employers are not supposed to but they do indeed discriminate and in this economy they have a huge line of people wanting work so they just say they gave it to someone else.</htmltext>
<tokenext>no its not but they do anyways .
they will just make up a different reason or just not contact you again .
i get it alot being i have a skin issue and a disibalty i work with .
employers are not supposed to but they do indeed discriminate and in this economy they have a huge line of people wanting work so they just say they gave it to someone else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no its not but they do anyways.
they will just make up a different reason or just not contact you again.
i get it alot being i have a skin issue and a disibalty i work with.
employers are not supposed to but they do indeed discriminate and in this economy they have a huge line of people wanting work so they just say they gave it to someone else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396376</id>
	<title>Did it ever occur to you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260448020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Society needs to wake-up and realize punishing someone for what they did 20 years ago is ridiculous"</p><p>Why?</p><p>You ruin someone's life forever by raping them, and it's not ok for it to follow you forever?</p><p>Or are you talking about parking tickets, or some other trivial matter which NEVER follow anyone for twenty years, and NEVER cause people to have issues with jobs and housing and such?  Which never follow anyone for twenty years and therefore are irrelevant to your point?</p><p>For felons, society ALREADY DECIDED YOU ARE WRONG and their past should follow them.  For notihng pissant crimes, you don't lose jobs or housing, so again your point is worthless.</p><p>It never occurs to you people that maybe the reason your viewpoint is in the minority and considered juvenile is because you're in the minority and your opinion is juvenile.</p><p>Who modded this whiny garbage up anyway?  You should be ashamed of yourself for such a stupid moderation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Society needs to wake-up and realize punishing someone for what they did 20 years ago is ridiculous " Why ? You ruin someone 's life forever by raping them , and it 's not ok for it to follow you forever ? Or are you talking about parking tickets , or some other trivial matter which NEVER follow anyone for twenty years , and NEVER cause people to have issues with jobs and housing and such ?
Which never follow anyone for twenty years and therefore are irrelevant to your point ? For felons , society ALREADY DECIDED YOU ARE WRONG and their past should follow them .
For notihng pissant crimes , you do n't lose jobs or housing , so again your point is worthless.It never occurs to you people that maybe the reason your viewpoint is in the minority and considered juvenile is because you 're in the minority and your opinion is juvenile.Who modded this whiny garbage up anyway ?
You should be ashamed of yourself for such a stupid moderation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Society needs to wake-up and realize punishing someone for what they did 20 years ago is ridiculous"Why?You ruin someone's life forever by raping them, and it's not ok for it to follow you forever?Or are you talking about parking tickets, or some other trivial matter which NEVER follow anyone for twenty years, and NEVER cause people to have issues with jobs and housing and such?
Which never follow anyone for twenty years and therefore are irrelevant to your point?For felons, society ALREADY DECIDED YOU ARE WRONG and their past should follow them.
For notihng pissant crimes, you don't lose jobs or housing, so again your point is worthless.It never occurs to you people that maybe the reason your viewpoint is in the minority and considered juvenile is because you're in the minority and your opinion is juvenile.Who modded this whiny garbage up anyway?
You should be ashamed of yourself for such a stupid moderation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398572</id>
	<title>Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260468960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Asshole.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Asshole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Asshole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399416</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260525960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Driving a company into the ground is not considered a bar for most companies reviewing a CEO.  Check the histories of most current CEO's, each will have been personally responsible for at LEAST one companies financial demise.  At that level, it's considered a "learning experiance".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Driving a company into the ground is not considered a bar for most companies reviewing a CEO .
Check the histories of most current CEO 's , each will have been personally responsible for at LEAST one companies financial demise .
At that level , it 's considered a " learning experiance " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Driving a company into the ground is not considered a bar for most companies reviewing a CEO.
Check the histories of most current CEO's, each will have been personally responsible for at LEAST one companies financial demise.
At that level, it's considered a "learning experiance".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394620</id>
	<title>White-out, that's the ticket</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1260441480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bought a used street sweeper and modded it with an extra tank on the top.  I fill that full of white-out that I made myself in bulk from a secret family recipe (what can I say, I come from a long line of screw-ups).  Then whenever I put my online foot in my mouth, I run out and hop in my "Eraser" and head off for my ISP's local datacenter... I whitewash the whole place top to bottom, and problem solved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bought a used street sweeper and modded it with an extra tank on the top .
I fill that full of white-out that I made myself in bulk from a secret family recipe ( what can I say , I come from a long line of screw-ups ) .
Then whenever I put my online foot in my mouth , I run out and hop in my " Eraser " and head off for my ISP 's local datacenter... I whitewash the whole place top to bottom , and problem solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bought a used street sweeper and modded it with an extra tank on the top.
I fill that full of white-out that I made myself in bulk from a secret family recipe (what can I say, I come from a long line of screw-ups).
Then whenever I put my online foot in my mouth, I run out and hop in my "Eraser" and head off for my ISP's local datacenter... I whitewash the whole place top to bottom, and problem solved.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395552</id>
	<title>Re:Not keeping low profile?</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1260444660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Part of the problem is that search engines assign more importance to sites that have been around longer. I think as far as judging a person, the older references should be *less* important than the recent ones... I wonder if anybody at Google is thinking on this problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Part of the problem is that search engines assign more importance to sites that have been around longer .
I think as far as judging a person , the older references should be * less * important than the recent ones... I wonder if anybody at Google is thinking on this problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Part of the problem is that search engines assign more importance to sites that have been around longer.
I think as far as judging a person, the older references should be *less* important than the recent ones... I wonder if anybody at Google is thinking on this problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396464</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Submitter Jesse Hirsh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260448500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Slash Code contributor is also from Toronto, so it is very likely the same person.</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse\_Hirsh</p><p>So, if people weren't making the connection between the 1995 Jesse Hirsh and the 2009 Jesse Hirsh, they definitely will now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Slash Code contributor is also from Toronto , so it is very likely the same person.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse \ _HirshSo , if people were n't making the connection between the 1995 Jesse Hirsh and the 2009 Jesse Hirsh , they definitely will now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Slash Code contributor is also from Toronto, so it is very likely the same person.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse\_HirshSo, if people weren't making the connection between the 1995 Jesse Hirsh and the 2009 Jesse Hirsh, they definitely will now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395946</id>
	<title>Re:The best thing you can do is post on /.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260446220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you think the bits of information he has given out are actually correct? If I were to ask a question like this, I would alter the truth sufficiently to make searching fruitless but still yield the best answers possible to an ask<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. (which, however, I don't expect to be particularly good). Maybe textfiles.com isn't textfiles.com and maybe he didn't do it to a university computer system but that of e.g. a company where he had his first job...?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you think the bits of information he has given out are actually correct ?
If I were to ask a question like this , I would alter the truth sufficiently to make searching fruitless but still yield the best answers possible to an ask / .
( which , however , I do n't expect to be particularly good ) .
Maybe textfiles.com is n't textfiles.com and maybe he did n't do it to a university computer system but that of e.g .
a company where he had his first job... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you think the bits of information he has given out are actually correct?
If I were to ask a question like this, I would alter the truth sufficiently to make searching fruitless but still yield the best answers possible to an ask /.
(which, however, I don't expect to be particularly good).
Maybe textfiles.com isn't textfiles.com and maybe he didn't do it to a university computer system but that of e.g.
a company where he had his first job...?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396432</id>
	<title>Re:How common is your name?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260448320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is another guy named Chris \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ in the same city I live in. He is a complete tool, about 4 years younger than me, and has a facebook profile and a blog that spew BS.</p><p>The only way I am able to know it is not me, is he has a picture of himself doing stupid crap on his Facebook profile pic (this week it's beer bong with hot girls).</p><p>I have a job, but I can only imagine that people would mistake me for him, as we have the same name, and have similar "jobs" in our profile.</p><p>If a prospective employer digs deep enough they'll realize we are different people, but really, the employer is going to google my name, find me doing hooter shooters of some 18 year old, and either a) hire me because I'm cool, or more likely b) not hire me, and stop the search there.</p><p>They won't even give me a reason. The advice on this page is to explain to the interviewer, what if you are never given that chance? If they check after you are short listed for an interview, but before the interview, you'll never know. If they check after they made an appointment to see you, you may find out, if they check after the interview, even if they like you, it is unlikely they'll say anything, they'll just pass you over for #2 (if they are close).</p><p>The biggest problem is having OTHER people post photos of you and tag them. Like your mom posting pictures of you harrassing the dog when you were 5, tagging your name, and your vet college entrance interviewers seeing that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is another guy named Chris \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ in the same city I live in .
He is a complete tool , about 4 years younger than me , and has a facebook profile and a blog that spew BS.The only way I am able to know it is not me , is he has a picture of himself doing stupid crap on his Facebook profile pic ( this week it 's beer bong with hot girls ) .I have a job , but I can only imagine that people would mistake me for him , as we have the same name , and have similar " jobs " in our profile.If a prospective employer digs deep enough they 'll realize we are different people , but really , the employer is going to google my name , find me doing hooter shooters of some 18 year old , and either a ) hire me because I 'm cool , or more likely b ) not hire me , and stop the search there.They wo n't even give me a reason .
The advice on this page is to explain to the interviewer , what if you are never given that chance ?
If they check after you are short listed for an interview , but before the interview , you 'll never know .
If they check after they made an appointment to see you , you may find out , if they check after the interview , even if they like you , it is unlikely they 'll say anything , they 'll just pass you over for # 2 ( if they are close ) .The biggest problem is having OTHER people post photos of you and tag them .
Like your mom posting pictures of you harrassing the dog when you were 5 , tagging your name , and your vet college entrance interviewers seeing that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is another guy named Chris \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ in the same city I live in.
He is a complete tool, about 4 years younger than me, and has a facebook profile and a blog that spew BS.The only way I am able to know it is not me, is he has a picture of himself doing stupid crap on his Facebook profile pic (this week it's beer bong with hot girls).I have a job, but I can only imagine that people would mistake me for him, as we have the same name, and have similar "jobs" in our profile.If a prospective employer digs deep enough they'll realize we are different people, but really, the employer is going to google my name, find me doing hooter shooters of some 18 year old, and either a) hire me because I'm cool, or more likely b) not hire me, and stop the search there.They won't even give me a reason.
The advice on this page is to explain to the interviewer, what if you are never given that chance?
If they check after you are short listed for an interview, but before the interview, you'll never know.
If they check after they made an appointment to see you, you may find out, if they check after the interview, even if they like you, it is unlikely they'll say anything, they'll just pass you over for #2 (if they are close).The biggest problem is having OTHER people post photos of you and tag them.
Like your mom posting pictures of you harrassing the dog when you were 5, tagging your name, and your vet college entrance interviewers seeing that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396526</id>
	<title>Re:Depends</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260448860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Did you rape and murder my sister while burglarizing her house 15 years ago?</p></div><p>Isn't it <em>interesting</em> that you're the only one asking that question? Why hasn't he responded to your question yet? Perhaps he has something to hide.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you rape and murder my sister while burglarizing her house 15 years ago ? Is n't it interesting that you 're the only one asking that question ?
Why has n't he responded to your question yet ?
Perhaps he has something to hide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you rape and murder my sister while burglarizing her house 15 years ago?Isn't it interesting that you're the only one asking that question?
Why hasn't he responded to your question yet?
Perhaps he has something to hide.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30403500</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Slashdot Parent</author>
	<datestamp>1260554160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law</p> </div><p>Minor nitpick, but statutes of limitations vary by offense and by state.</p><p>So if you intend to break a law and then wait out the 7 years, might want to do a little research first.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>IMHO just as thre 's a 7-year stature of limitations on law Minor nitpick , but statutes of limitations vary by offense and by state.So if you intend to break a law and then wait out the 7 years , might want to do a little research first .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMHO just as thre's a 7-year stature of limitations on law Minor nitpick, but statutes of limitations vary by offense and by state.So if you intend to break a law and then wait out the 7 years, might want to do a little research first.
;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640</id>
	<title>Re:welleee</title>
	<author>Restil</author>
	<datestamp>1260445080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, in all fairness, it wasn't one mistake, it was at least two.  First, he screwed up.  Then, after that had more or less blown over, he decided to brag about it..  I mean "mentioned it to a friend who published the details of the exploit using real names".  Congrats.  You're notorious now.  You have your street cred.</p><p>If you're REALLY concerned, take comfort in the fact that you are not the only one to ever screw up, and with luck and a long period of time without a history of further screwups, past indiscretions will be all but forgotten.</p><p>However, as I see it, you have three options.  Either forget about it and hope nobody finds out, embrace it as a life lesson and show how you used the fallout from that event to learn to better take responsibility for your actions....   Or bury it.  Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you will only find the good stuff and hopefully will get bored before they find that one blemish.</p><p>-Restil</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , in all fairness , it was n't one mistake , it was at least two .
First , he screwed up .
Then , after that had more or less blown over , he decided to brag about it.. I mean " mentioned it to a friend who published the details of the exploit using real names " .
Congrats. You 're notorious now .
You have your street cred.If you 're REALLY concerned , take comfort in the fact that you are not the only one to ever screw up , and with luck and a long period of time without a history of further screwups , past indiscretions will be all but forgotten.However , as I see it , you have three options .
Either forget about it and hope nobody finds out , embrace it as a life lesson and show how you used the fallout from that event to learn to better take responsibility for your actions.... Or bury it .
Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you will only find the good stuff and hopefully will get bored before they find that one blemish.-Restil</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, in all fairness, it wasn't one mistake, it was at least two.
First, he screwed up.
Then, after that had more or less blown over, he decided to brag about it..  I mean "mentioned it to a friend who published the details of the exploit using real names".
Congrats.  You're notorious now.
You have your street cred.If you're REALLY concerned, take comfort in the fact that you are not the only one to ever screw up, and with luck and a long period of time without a history of further screwups, past indiscretions will be all but forgotten.However, as I see it, you have three options.
Either forget about it and hope nobody finds out, embrace it as a life lesson and show how you used the fallout from that event to learn to better take responsibility for your actions....   Or bury it.
Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you will only find the good stuff and hopefully will get bored before they find that one blemish.-Restil</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396860</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260450780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Put as much false, misleading, true, and whatever else you can think of information on the net associated with your name.  In essence, poison the information well.  Just make sure that it is innocuous and they will probably give up searching before they reach it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Put as much false , misleading , true , and whatever else you can think of information on the net associated with your name .
In essence , poison the information well .
Just make sure that it is innocuous and they will probably give up searching before they reach it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Put as much false, misleading, true, and whatever else you can think of information on the net associated with your name.
In essence, poison the information well.
Just make sure that it is innocuous and they will probably give up searching before they reach it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396954</id>
	<title>Re:Depends</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260451500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And for that you get to spend the reat of your life in prison. </p><p>
&nbsp; Fair trade for revenge don't ya think...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And for that you get to spend the reat of your life in prison .
  Fair trade for revenge do n't ya think.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And for that you get to spend the reat of your life in prison.
  Fair trade for revenge don't ya think...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398736</id>
	<title>Don't keep a low profile</title>
	<author>dageyra</author>
	<datestamp>1260471840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a problem in how people think "don't have an online presence to avoid these problems".  In principle, it would be great, but principle is little more than that.  You have a prime example of why you need a greater online presence.  This one little issue mirrored across the web is amplified by the notable lack of other information about you.  You should make a stronger web presence where you put in the information you want people to see, and over time, this will drown out the other information.  Just make sure you are not a douche/troll/jacka$$/etc, contribute to the web, and that is what people will find.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a problem in how people think " do n't have an online presence to avoid these problems " .
In principle , it would be great , but principle is little more than that .
You have a prime example of why you need a greater online presence .
This one little issue mirrored across the web is amplified by the notable lack of other information about you .
You should make a stronger web presence where you put in the information you want people to see , and over time , this will drown out the other information .
Just make sure you are not a douche/troll/jacka $ $ /etc , contribute to the web , and that is what people will find .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a problem in how people think "don't have an online presence to avoid these problems".
In principle, it would be great, but principle is little more than that.
You have a prime example of why you need a greater online presence.
This one little issue mirrored across the web is amplified by the notable lack of other information about you.
You should make a stronger web presence where you put in the information you want people to see, and over time, this will drown out the other information.
Just make sure you are not a douche/troll/jacka$$/etc, contribute to the web, and that is what people will find.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394474</id>
	<title>Live With It</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260440880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A single act you did as a kid 15 years ago will not define who you are. Anyone who treats the event as a defining act is probably a jackass and not someone you want to deal with anyways. However, given how much effort/thought you have put into dealing with the situation, I would guess these events did have some kind of significant effect on who you are as a person today. Should it ever come up in a discussion, I would use it as an opportunity to put a positive spin on yourself and how you are a better, more ethical person because of your youthful mistake(s)</htmltext>
<tokenext>A single act you did as a kid 15 years ago will not define who you are .
Anyone who treats the event as a defining act is probably a jackass and not someone you want to deal with anyways .
However , given how much effort/thought you have put into dealing with the situation , I would guess these events did have some kind of significant effect on who you are as a person today .
Should it ever come up in a discussion , I would use it as an opportunity to put a positive spin on yourself and how you are a better , more ethical person because of your youthful mistake ( s )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A single act you did as a kid 15 years ago will not define who you are.
Anyone who treats the event as a defining act is probably a jackass and not someone you want to deal with anyways.
However, given how much effort/thought you have put into dealing with the situation, I would guess these events did have some kind of significant effect on who you are as a person today.
Should it ever come up in a discussion, I would use it as an opportunity to put a positive spin on yourself and how you are a better, more ethical person because of your youthful mistake(s)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394540</id>
	<title>If you can't dazzle them with brilliance</title>
	<author>MerlynEmrys67</author>
	<datestamp>1260441180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Baffle them with Bullshit.
<p>
Create all kinds of web presence - create several blogs and crosslink them to high profile sites.  Google juice the heck out of a personal web page you have.  Post about work you do on various sites.</p><p>
It boils down to make it so the one incident is buried in googles results to the second page, and even then - they will see all the positive stuff on the first page and wonder if it is even you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Baffle them with Bullshit .
Create all kinds of web presence - create several blogs and crosslink them to high profile sites .
Google juice the heck out of a personal web page you have .
Post about work you do on various sites .
It boils down to make it so the one incident is buried in googles results to the second page , and even then - they will see all the positive stuff on the first page and wonder if it is even you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Baffle them with Bullshit.
Create all kinds of web presence - create several blogs and crosslink them to high profile sites.
Google juice the heck out of a personal web page you have.
Post about work you do on various sites.
It boils down to make it so the one incident is buried in googles results to the second page, and even then - they will see all the positive stuff on the first page and wonder if it is even you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30420428</id>
	<title>Shawn McHorse is gay, too.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260643440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just look at the pictures here: <a href="http://www.austinrocky.org/bio/shawn.php" title="austinrocky.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.austinrocky.org/bio/shawn.php</a> [austinrocky.org]</p><p>It also says that he was married... I wonder why he's not anymore (hint: look at the gay flag on the bottom of the page).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just look at the pictures here : http : //www.austinrocky.org/bio/shawn.php [ austinrocky.org ] It also says that he was married... I wonder why he 's not anymore ( hint : look at the gay flag on the bottom of the page ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just look at the pictures here: http://www.austinrocky.org/bio/shawn.php [austinrocky.org]It also says that he was married... I wonder why he's not anymore (hint: look at the gay flag on the bottom of the page).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395768</id>
	<title>become Martin Bishop</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1260445500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>become Martin Bishop</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>become Martin Bishop</tokentext>
<sentencetext>become Martin Bishop</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397784</id>
	<title>Ehem..</title>
	<author>formfeed</author>
	<datestamp>1260458220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I never had sex with that woman.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I never had sex with that woman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never had sex with that woman.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397204</id>
	<title>How about your domain?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260453240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have kind of the same question</p><p>I have my own domain that is myfirstname@mylastname.com</p><p>kind of a different last name so it was easy to find</p><p>last xmas some china man went out and sent a ton of spam for watches with my e-mail as the one sending it.  I would get 1000+ spam rejects a day for a few weeks.  Now i have problems e-mailing freinds that use hotmail because i am blacklisted?  How do u get off of that?  Really bugs me as its my name, and it is rather hard to change that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have kind of the same questionI have my own domain that is myfirstname @ mylastname.comkind of a different last name so it was easy to findlast xmas some china man went out and sent a ton of spam for watches with my e-mail as the one sending it .
I would get 1000 + spam rejects a day for a few weeks .
Now i have problems e-mailing freinds that use hotmail because i am blacklisted ?
How do u get off of that ?
Really bugs me as its my name , and it is rather hard to change that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have kind of the same questionI have my own domain that is myfirstname@mylastname.comkind of a different last name so it was easy to findlast xmas some china man went out and sent a ton of spam for watches with my e-mail as the one sending it.
I would get 1000+ spam rejects a day for a few weeks.
Now i have problems e-mailing freinds that use hotmail because i am blacklisted?
How do u get off of that?
Really bugs me as its my name, and it is rather hard to change that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396350</id>
	<title>What am I missing...</title>
	<author>dodden</author>
	<datestamp>1260447840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You are posting on a public forum about taking down your online presence from a past transgression. Are you serious?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You are posting on a public forum about taking down your online presence from a past transgression .
Are you serious ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are posting on a public forum about taking down your online presence from a past transgression.
Are you serious?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394798</id>
	<title>Alias</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is one of many reasons why people have to use aliases, and why it shouldn't be illegal.</p><p>I have said it before, citizens must alias.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is one of many reasons why people have to use aliases , and why it should n't be illegal.I have said it before , citizens must alias .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is one of many reasons why people have to use aliases, and why it shouldn't be illegal.I have said it before, citizens must alias.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394574</id>
	<title>Re:Why bother?</title>
	<author>Eric in SF</author>
	<datestamp>1260441300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's just setting yourself up for getting fired later for lying to your prospective employer during the interview process.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's just setting yourself up for getting fired later for lying to your prospective employer during the interview process .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's just setting yourself up for getting fired later for lying to your prospective employer during the interview process.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397818</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1260458580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So when a board of directors is reviewing the candidates for their new CEO, they should just ignore the fact that eight years ago one candidate drove his company into the ground and ran off with all its assets, while another has a spotless record?</p></div><p>Apparently that's exactly what they do. A number of high profile toxic CEOs have gone from company to company leaving each a shell of it's former self.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So when a board of directors is reviewing the candidates for their new CEO , they should just ignore the fact that eight years ago one candidate drove his company into the ground and ran off with all its assets , while another has a spotless record ? Apparently that 's exactly what they do .
A number of high profile toxic CEOs have gone from company to company leaving each a shell of it 's former self .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So when a board of directors is reviewing the candidates for their new CEO, they should just ignore the fact that eight years ago one candidate drove his company into the ground and ran off with all its assets, while another has a spotless record?Apparently that's exactly what they do.
A number of high profile toxic CEOs have gone from company to company leaving each a shell of it's former self.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396804</id>
	<title>Take responsibility for those words and actions</title>
	<author>Orion Blastar</author>
	<datestamp>1260450480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got a lot of stuff about me written all over the Internet. I've been accused of a lot of things, but nothing ever proven in a court of law. I am usually persecuted because I am mentally ill and my schizoaffective disorder causes behavior and actions that some people don't like and then post about it on the Internet or my own words on the Internet during one of my "bad cycles" makes me look bad.</p><p>What you should do is tell the potential employer the truth, that you got investigated but no charges were filed against you. That you learned from it and moved on so as to not make that mistake over again. Apparently since X years of not being investigated proves that you didn't do it ever again, and that you know enough about it to help prevent it on your employer's systems. You take a negative and turn it into a positive as Kevin Mitnik did after he was found guilty and he wrote books on the subject and got hired as a security consultant. Even if you do have a criminal record like Kevin Mitnik, you can still turn it around by doing what he did and owning up to it and finding a way to foil others who use the same methods.</p><p>If your potential employer still gives you a hard time about it, just say it was X years ago, really really old, and you have moved on from it and suggest that the employer move on from it as well as you'd rather focus on your skills and talents and ability to do the work for the job than dwell over mistakes of the past via ancient history that hardly anyone cares about anymore.</p><p>Worst possible case scenario is that nobody hires you, even then you can start up your own small business and take business management lessons at a community college to learn how to make it profitable and apply for a small business loan after writing up a business plan and earning enough money to get a bank's attention.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got a lot of stuff about me written all over the Internet .
I 've been accused of a lot of things , but nothing ever proven in a court of law .
I am usually persecuted because I am mentally ill and my schizoaffective disorder causes behavior and actions that some people do n't like and then post about it on the Internet or my own words on the Internet during one of my " bad cycles " makes me look bad.What you should do is tell the potential employer the truth , that you got investigated but no charges were filed against you .
That you learned from it and moved on so as to not make that mistake over again .
Apparently since X years of not being investigated proves that you did n't do it ever again , and that you know enough about it to help prevent it on your employer 's systems .
You take a negative and turn it into a positive as Kevin Mitnik did after he was found guilty and he wrote books on the subject and got hired as a security consultant .
Even if you do have a criminal record like Kevin Mitnik , you can still turn it around by doing what he did and owning up to it and finding a way to foil others who use the same methods.If your potential employer still gives you a hard time about it , just say it was X years ago , really really old , and you have moved on from it and suggest that the employer move on from it as well as you 'd rather focus on your skills and talents and ability to do the work for the job than dwell over mistakes of the past via ancient history that hardly anyone cares about anymore.Worst possible case scenario is that nobody hires you , even then you can start up your own small business and take business management lessons at a community college to learn how to make it profitable and apply for a small business loan after writing up a business plan and earning enough money to get a bank 's attention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got a lot of stuff about me written all over the Internet.
I've been accused of a lot of things, but nothing ever proven in a court of law.
I am usually persecuted because I am mentally ill and my schizoaffective disorder causes behavior and actions that some people don't like and then post about it on the Internet or my own words on the Internet during one of my "bad cycles" makes me look bad.What you should do is tell the potential employer the truth, that you got investigated but no charges were filed against you.
That you learned from it and moved on so as to not make that mistake over again.
Apparently since X years of not being investigated proves that you didn't do it ever again, and that you know enough about it to help prevent it on your employer's systems.
You take a negative and turn it into a positive as Kevin Mitnik did after he was found guilty and he wrote books on the subject and got hired as a security consultant.
Even if you do have a criminal record like Kevin Mitnik, you can still turn it around by doing what he did and owning up to it and finding a way to foil others who use the same methods.If your potential employer still gives you a hard time about it, just say it was X years ago, really really old, and you have moved on from it and suggest that the employer move on from it as well as you'd rather focus on your skills and talents and ability to do the work for the job than dwell over mistakes of the past via ancient history that hardly anyone cares about anymore.Worst possible case scenario is that nobody hires you, even then you can start up your own small business and take business management lessons at a community college to learn how to make it profitable and apply for a small business loan after writing up a business plan and earning enough money to get a bank's attention.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396098</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Thinboy00</author>
	<datestamp>1260446760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>His sig:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>MY MAC'S DEAD. I installed Security update 2009-005, rebooted, and now it won't startup. Maybe an MS programmer wrote it</p></div><p>His comment:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Sorry for the typos - I'm typing on a mac.<br><b>I'm not usd to this keyboard'</b> </p></div><p>O RLY?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>His sig : MY MAC 'S DEAD .
I installed Security update 2009-005 , rebooted , and now it wo n't startup .
Maybe an MS programmer wrote itHis comment : Sorry for the typos - I 'm typing on a mac.I 'm not usd to this keyboard ' O RLY ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His sig:MY MAC'S DEAD.
I installed Security update 2009-005, rebooted, and now it won't startup.
Maybe an MS programmer wrote itHis comment:Sorry for the typos - I'm typing on a mac.I'm not usd to this keyboard' O RLY?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397840</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing you can do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260458700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So when a board of directors is reviewing the candidates for their new CEO, they should just ignore the fact that eight years ago one candidate drove his company into the ground and ran off with all its assets, while another has a spotless record?</i></p><p>If someone managed to SINGLE-HANDEDLY drive a company into the ground and run off with all its assets, I'd assume management was absolutely worthless and the candidate was a genius for making off like a bandit.</p><p>You have to be pretty damned high up the chain or outrageously good to drive a company into the ground. John Smith in Sales never destroyed a Fortune 500 company. Now if you a CEO or on the board of directors, THAT would be a different case entirely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So when a board of directors is reviewing the candidates for their new CEO , they should just ignore the fact that eight years ago one candidate drove his company into the ground and ran off with all its assets , while another has a spotless record ? If someone managed to SINGLE-HANDEDLY drive a company into the ground and run off with all its assets , I 'd assume management was absolutely worthless and the candidate was a genius for making off like a bandit.You have to be pretty damned high up the chain or outrageously good to drive a company into the ground .
John Smith in Sales never destroyed a Fortune 500 company .
Now if you a CEO or on the board of directors , THAT would be a different case entirely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So when a board of directors is reviewing the candidates for their new CEO, they should just ignore the fact that eight years ago one candidate drove his company into the ground and ran off with all its assets, while another has a spotless record?If someone managed to SINGLE-HANDEDLY drive a company into the ground and run off with all its assets, I'd assume management was absolutely worthless and the candidate was a genius for making off like a bandit.You have to be pretty damned high up the chain or outrageously good to drive a company into the ground.
John Smith in Sales never destroyed a Fortune 500 company.
Now if you a CEO or on the board of directors, THAT would be a different case entirely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395854</id>
	<title>Re:And here's the payback coming to the Internet G</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260445800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I changed my name by deed poll - I won't tell you to what, but it happens to also be the name of a mildly popular book.  It worked fantastically!   I have made myself practically ungoogleable, even if you know who I am and what I do.  I'm buried under pages and pages of boring reviews and commentary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I changed my name by deed poll - I wo n't tell you to what , but it happens to also be the name of a mildly popular book .
It worked fantastically !
I have made myself practically ungoogleable , even if you know who I am and what I do .
I 'm buried under pages and pages of boring reviews and commentary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I changed my name by deed poll - I won't tell you to what, but it happens to also be the name of a mildly popular book.
It worked fantastically!
I have made myself practically ungoogleable, even if you know who I am and what I do.
I'm buried under pages and pages of boring reviews and commentary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397470</id>
	<title>You'd have better luck...</title>
	<author>Bones3D\_mac</author>
	<datestamp>1260455580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>getting your name off of a sexual predator list after suffering a frivolous statutory rape charge.</p><p>In other words, you lost control of the situation after it was mirrored from the original source.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>getting your name off of a sexual predator list after suffering a frivolous statutory rape charge.In other words , you lost control of the situation after it was mirrored from the original source .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>getting your name off of a sexual predator list after suffering a frivolous statutory rape charge.In other words, you lost control of the situation after it was mirrored from the original source.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_189</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_164</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_175</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_133</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30404816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_199</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_183</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_141</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30404108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30408556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_151</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395712
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_178</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_170</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30407366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_200</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_188</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_192</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30405196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30419986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_127</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30407336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30403500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_149</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_135</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_181</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_159</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_143</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_191</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30405146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_167</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_153</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_161</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_172</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_138</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_130</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_202</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_196</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_182</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_148</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_140</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30419362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_132</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30421632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_198</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_156</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_142</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_166</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_129</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394712
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_177</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_139</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_185</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_171</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_201</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_195</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_193</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396512
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_169</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_128</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_180</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30446390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_158</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_150</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_168</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_160</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_126</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_179</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_137</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_187</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_145</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_131</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_197</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_155</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_163</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_174</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_204</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30412658
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_184</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_176</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_134</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_186</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_190</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_144</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30403662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_173</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_203</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30416680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_147</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_157</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_165</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30411380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30410462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_136</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_194</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_152</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_146</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_162</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30420428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_2115238_154</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30410514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395412
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394430
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396552
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396614
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394654
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397014
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402544
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30419986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395712
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30408556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395622
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396448
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396490
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30405196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396380
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395174
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397206
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395202
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394942
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394926
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30419362
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30421632
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399410
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396432
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400894
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395582
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394712
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395306
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394592
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395664
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401358
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394778
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397798
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396280
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396722
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394522
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395344
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394878
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398086
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394676
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395854
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395364
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395154
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395356
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395946
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394956
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396558
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395510
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30410462
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397642
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398128
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400328
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30403662
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30412658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30410514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395464
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30411380
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394850
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397126
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395670
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395498
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395722
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394572
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394836
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394376
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394864
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396784
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395640
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397994
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396472
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396652
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396842
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398978
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396828
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396462
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397528
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398766
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30405146
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30416680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396736
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399194
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396782
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399816
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30404108
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399654
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401068
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400264
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398292
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395834
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30404816
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30420428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398572
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397522
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30446390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394502
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394698
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394630
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394680
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397486
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395184
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394548
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394700
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399844
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395448
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395588
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398182
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396098
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398116
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396206
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401600
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400114
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396172
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395654
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396376
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402270
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397592
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396004
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395868
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395802
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398414
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399974
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399364
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397778
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401694
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400884
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399568
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396054
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396184
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394960
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396526
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30400134
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30407366
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30401730
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30398316
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396954
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30407336
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395326
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30403500
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396292
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397574
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397606
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397840
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397674
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399866
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397818
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397868
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399416
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395044
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394784
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402282
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399428
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399102
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30396644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30397630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395032
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30402854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30399488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394554
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394574
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394422
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_2115238.45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30394552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_2115238.30395336
</commentlist>
</conversation>
