<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_09_1939214</id>
	<title>Gigantic Spiral of Light Observed Over Norway; Rocket To Blame?</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1260346980000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Ch\_Omega writes <i>"A <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1234430/Mystery-spiral-blue-light-display-hovers-Norway.html">mysterious light display appearing over Norway last night</a> (<a href="http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/distrikt/troms\_og\_finnmark/1.6902392?index=false">more pictures</a>) has left thousands of residents in the north of the country baffled. Witnesses from Tr&#248;ndelag to Finnmark compared the amazing display to anything from a Russian rocket to a meteor to a shock wave &mdash; although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yet. The phenomenon began when what appeared to be a blue light seemed to soar up from behind a mountain. It stopped mid-air, then began to circulate. Within seconds a giant spiral had covered the entire sky. Then a green-blue beam of light shot out from its center &mdash; lasting for ten to twelve minutes before disappearing completely. The Norwegian Meteorological Institute was flooded with telephone calls after the light storm &mdash; which astronomers have said did not appear to have been connected to the aurora, or Northern Lights, so common in that area of the world."</i> The Bad Astronomer makes the case that a <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/awesomely-bizarre-light-show-freaks-out-norway/">malfunctioning rocket spewing fuel</a> is a parsimonious explanation, backed up by witnesses to similar events and a cool simulation (on video). An anonymous reader suggests that <a href="http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Russian\_ProtonM\_Carrier\_Rocket\_Launch\_Postponed\_24\_Hours.html">this Proton-M Carrier Rocket might be responsible</a> for the display.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ch \ _Omega writes " A mysterious light display appearing over Norway last night ( more pictures ) has left thousands of residents in the north of the country baffled .
Witnesses from Tr   ndelag to Finnmark compared the amazing display to anything from a Russian rocket to a meteor to a shock wave    although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yet .
The phenomenon began when what appeared to be a blue light seemed to soar up from behind a mountain .
It stopped mid-air , then began to circulate .
Within seconds a giant spiral had covered the entire sky .
Then a green-blue beam of light shot out from its center    lasting for ten to twelve minutes before disappearing completely .
The Norwegian Meteorological Institute was flooded with telephone calls after the light storm    which astronomers have said did not appear to have been connected to the aurora , or Northern Lights , so common in that area of the world .
" The Bad Astronomer makes the case that a malfunctioning rocket spewing fuel is a parsimonious explanation , backed up by witnesses to similar events and a cool simulation ( on video ) .
An anonymous reader suggests that this Proton-M Carrier Rocket might be responsible for the display .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ch\_Omega writes "A mysterious light display appearing over Norway last night (more pictures) has left thousands of residents in the north of the country baffled.
Witnesses from Trøndelag to Finnmark compared the amazing display to anything from a Russian rocket to a meteor to a shock wave — although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yet.
The phenomenon began when what appeared to be a blue light seemed to soar up from behind a mountain.
It stopped mid-air, then began to circulate.
Within seconds a giant spiral had covered the entire sky.
Then a green-blue beam of light shot out from its center — lasting for ten to twelve minutes before disappearing completely.
The Norwegian Meteorological Institute was flooded with telephone calls after the light storm — which astronomers have said did not appear to have been connected to the aurora, or Northern Lights, so common in that area of the world.
" The Bad Astronomer makes the case that a malfunctioning rocket spewing fuel is a parsimonious explanation, backed up by witnesses to similar events and a cool simulation (on video).
An anonymous reader suggests that this Proton-M Carrier Rocket might be responsible for the display.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384062</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>StickANeedleInMyEye</author>
	<datestamp>1259593080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...it's certainly pretty, but unfortunately, not the black hole the LHC was supposed to bring us.  Bastards.</p></div><p>Yeah *that* black hole looks like my empty pocketbook that paid for the LHC.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...it 's certainly pretty , but unfortunately , not the black hole the LHC was supposed to bring us .
Bastards.Yeah * that * black hole looks like my empty pocketbook that paid for the LHC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...it's certainly pretty, but unfortunately, not the black hole the LHC was supposed to bring us.
Bastards.Yeah *that* black hole looks like my empty pocketbook that paid for the LHC.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381166</id>
	<title>UFOs</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1259576760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> Witnesses from Tr&#248;ndelag to Finnmark compared the amazing display to anything from a Russian rocket to a meteor to a shock wave -- although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yet.</p></div> </blockquote><p>That's because a UFO isn't an explanation -- a UFO is an "unidentified flying object". You could compare it to specific instances of unexplained aerial phenomena -- though that's unlikely to help explain it unless the conditions surrounding this occurrence help explain some whole class of previously-unexplained aerial phenomena -- but to compare it to UFOs <i>in general</i> is somewhat pointless since the only thing that that class shares in common is that they appear above the ground and are not explained.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Witnesses from Tr   ndelag to Finnmark compared the amazing display to anything from a Russian rocket to a meteor to a shock wave -- although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yet .
That 's because a UFO is n't an explanation -- a UFO is an " unidentified flying object " .
You could compare it to specific instances of unexplained aerial phenomena -- though that 's unlikely to help explain it unless the conditions surrounding this occurrence help explain some whole class of previously-unexplained aerial phenomena -- but to compare it to UFOs in general is somewhat pointless since the only thing that that class shares in common is that they appear above the ground and are not explained .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Witnesses from Trøndelag to Finnmark compared the amazing display to anything from a Russian rocket to a meteor to a shock wave -- although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yet.
That's because a UFO isn't an explanation -- a UFO is an "unidentified flying object".
You could compare it to specific instances of unexplained aerial phenomena -- though that's unlikely to help explain it unless the conditions surrounding this occurrence help explain some whole class of previously-unexplained aerial phenomena -- but to compare it to UFOs in general is somewhat pointless since the only thing that that class shares in common is that they appear above the ground and are not explained.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381786</id>
	<title>Global Warming</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259579400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was the furious venting of the planet in its anger over Global warming. This venting will cause a radical shift in global temperatures and rapid cooling which will cover the planet in ice. I'm sure I can whip up a study, some anecdotal evidence, and some impressive statistics in a few more hours to prove my conclusion. After all, that's how all the best science is done these days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was the furious venting of the planet in its anger over Global warming .
This venting will cause a radical shift in global temperatures and rapid cooling which will cover the planet in ice .
I 'm sure I can whip up a study , some anecdotal evidence , and some impressive statistics in a few more hours to prove my conclusion .
After all , that 's how all the best science is done these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was the furious venting of the planet in its anger over Global warming.
This venting will cause a radical shift in global temperatures and rapid cooling which will cover the planet in ice.
I'm sure I can whip up a study, some anecdotal evidence, and some impressive statistics in a few more hours to prove my conclusion.
After all, that's how all the best science is done these days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381152</id>
	<title>Geez, Earth is no fun any more</title>
	<author>david.emery</author>
	<datestamp>1259576700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; - although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yet</p><p>It's no fun buzzing Earth if there's no panic calling to authorities and calls for investigation of the subsequent coverup.</p><p>Bleezarp (from Alpha Centauri...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; - although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yetIt 's no fun buzzing Earth if there 's no panic calling to authorities and calls for investigation of the subsequent coverup.Bleezarp ( from Alpha Centauri... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; - although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yetIt's no fun buzzing Earth if there's no panic calling to authorities and calls for investigation of the subsequent coverup.Bleezarp (from Alpha Centauri...)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380816</id>
	<title>Endgame Cinema</title>
	<author>W. Justice Black</author>
	<datestamp>1259575260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The explanation is simple.  The plucky young upstart warrior (and perhaps the rest of his party) just defeated the final boss using his strongest-ever attack.  One involving, say, exploding materia*.</p><p>What everyone saw was just the endgame cutscene for that (at a safe distance, of course).</p><p>* Materia is a Final Fantasy VII term.  Substitute your favorite mystical RPG energy thingy here if you like.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The explanation is simple .
The plucky young upstart warrior ( and perhaps the rest of his party ) just defeated the final boss using his strongest-ever attack .
One involving , say , exploding materia * .What everyone saw was just the endgame cutscene for that ( at a safe distance , of course ) .
* Materia is a Final Fantasy VII term .
Substitute your favorite mystical RPG energy thingy here if you like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The explanation is simple.
The plucky young upstart warrior (and perhaps the rest of his party) just defeated the final boss using his strongest-ever attack.
One involving, say, exploding materia*.What everyone saw was just the endgame cutscene for that (at a safe distance, of course).
* Materia is a Final Fantasy VII term.
Substitute your favorite mystical RPG energy thingy here if you like.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383932</id>
	<title>Russian RS-24 ABM-laser countermeasures 'demo'</title>
	<author>Chromal</author>
	<datestamp>1259591880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Russian officials stated as recently as Oct 22nd they would be deploying their new RS-24 ICBM &ldquo;in 2009.&rdquo; Why wait? It technically violated the START-I nonproliferation treaty, to which they were party. The &lsquo;good&rsquo; news? The START-I treaty expired on Saturday, Dec 5th, 2009.</p><p>What makes the RS-24 special? Its widely-boasted ability to penetrate the US&rsquo;s anti-ballistic-missile shield technology (e.g.: Tactical High Energy Lasers). There are a variety of theoretical ICBM laser countermeasures, and it looks like the Russians are trying at least two: 1) Oscillating Trajectory 2) Ablative gas shield. They may be coming from the same system, e.g.: the shield also causes the oscillations with a carefully vectored output.</p><p>Doesn&rsquo;t hurt for leverage in the literally ongoing as I type renegotiation of a treaty to replace START-I. Also, doesn&rsquo;t hurt that Obama&rsquo;s scheduled to be in Oslo, Norway, for the Nobel Prize acceptance ceremony tomorrow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Russian officials stated as recently as Oct 22nd they would be deploying their new RS-24 ICBM    in 2009.    Why wait ?
It technically violated the START-I nonproliferation treaty , to which they were party .
The    good    news ?
The START-I treaty expired on Saturday , Dec 5th , 2009.What makes the RS-24 special ?
Its widely-boasted ability to penetrate the US    s anti-ballistic-missile shield technology ( e.g .
: Tactical High Energy Lasers ) .
There are a variety of theoretical ICBM laser countermeasures , and it looks like the Russians are trying at least two : 1 ) Oscillating Trajectory 2 ) Ablative gas shield .
They may be coming from the same system , e.g .
: the shield also causes the oscillations with a carefully vectored output.Doesn    t hurt for leverage in the literally ongoing as I type renegotiation of a treaty to replace START-I .
Also , doesn    t hurt that Obama    s scheduled to be in Oslo , Norway , for the Nobel Prize acceptance ceremony tomorrow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Russian officials stated as recently as Oct 22nd they would be deploying their new RS-24 ICBM “in 2009.” Why wait?
It technically violated the START-I nonproliferation treaty, to which they were party.
The ‘good’ news?
The START-I treaty expired on Saturday, Dec 5th, 2009.What makes the RS-24 special?
Its widely-boasted ability to penetrate the US’s anti-ballistic-missile shield technology (e.g.
: Tactical High Energy Lasers).
There are a variety of theoretical ICBM laser countermeasures, and it looks like the Russians are trying at least two: 1) Oscillating Trajectory 2) Ablative gas shield.
They may be coming from the same system, e.g.
: the shield also causes the oscillations with a carefully vectored output.Doesn’t hurt for leverage in the literally ongoing as I type renegotiation of a treaty to replace START-I.
Also, doesn’t hurt that Obama’s scheduled to be in Oslo, Norway, for the Nobel Prize acceptance ceremony tomorrow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380872</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1259575560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The third picture on the second link clearly shows a vapour trail lit by the fading sunset. However I think physicists are going to have a hard time explaining a rotating spiral and a blue beam of light with ice crystals.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The third picture on the second link clearly shows a vapour trail lit by the fading sunset .
However I think physicists are going to have a hard time explaining a rotating spiral and a blue beam of light with ice crystals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The third picture on the second link clearly shows a vapour trail lit by the fading sunset.
However I think physicists are going to have a hard time explaining a rotating spiral and a blue beam of light with ice crystals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381084</id>
	<title>Re: "akustimeportal" tag</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259576400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Awesome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Awesome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380780</id>
	<title>Close Encounter of The Third Kind!</title>
	<author>kai\_hiwatari</author>
	<datestamp>1259575080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Close Encounter of The Third Kind!
They are here!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Close Encounter of The Third Kind !
They are here !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Close Encounter of The Third Kind!
They are here!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386674</id>
	<title>Flush</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260449400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>God just flushed his toilet. No biggy...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>God just flushed his toilet .
No biggy.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>God just flushed his toilet.
No biggy...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380462</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259573580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has anyone considered that this is just an NVidia ad for their new Blu-Ray 3D format?</p><p>Am I posting to the correct story?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone considered that this is just an NVidia ad for their new Blu-Ray 3D format ? Am I posting to the correct story ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone considered that this is just an NVidia ad for their new Blu-Ray 3D format?Am I posting to the correct story?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382620</id>
	<title>What Proton-M launch?</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1259583660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
There wasn't a known Proton-M launch this week.  There was <a href="http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/level2.html?NewsID=14566785&amp;PageNum=0" title="itar-tass.com">one on November 25, 2009</a> [itar-tass.com].  The article cited by the "anonymous poster" is from a 2006 launch.
</p><p>
Proton-M rockets are huge, and are launched from Baikonur in Kazakhstan. When one of those things is launched, it gets noticed.
</p><p>
Somebody local may have launched something, but it probably wasn't launched 1000 km away from Kazakhstan.  There are pictures from multiple locations, and many show ground details.  So get those pictures geo-located and aligned, and figure out where
it came from.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was n't a known Proton-M launch this week .
There was one on November 25 , 2009 [ itar-tass.com ] .
The article cited by the " anonymous poster " is from a 2006 launch .
Proton-M rockets are huge , and are launched from Baikonur in Kazakhstan .
When one of those things is launched , it gets noticed .
Somebody local may have launched something , but it probably was n't launched 1000 km away from Kazakhstan .
There are pictures from multiple locations , and many show ground details .
So get those pictures geo-located and aligned , and figure out where it came from .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
There wasn't a known Proton-M launch this week.
There was one on November 25, 2009 [itar-tass.com].
The article cited by the "anonymous poster" is from a 2006 launch.
Proton-M rockets are huge, and are launched from Baikonur in Kazakhstan.
When one of those things is launched, it gets noticed.
Somebody local may have launched something, but it probably wasn't launched 1000 km away from Kazakhstan.
There are pictures from multiple locations, and many show ground details.
So get those pictures geo-located and aligned, and figure out where
it came from.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381426</id>
	<title>/flash/</title>
	<author>SterlingX</author>
	<datestamp>1259577900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's Venus flying through a weather balloon full of swamp gas. Move along folks, nothing to see here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's Venus flying through a weather balloon full of swamp gas .
Move along folks , nothing to see here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's Venus flying through a weather balloon full of swamp gas.
Move along folks, nothing to see here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382564</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>princessproton</author>
	<datestamp>1259583300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are seriously mistaken. UFO stands for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO" title="wikipedia.org">"unidentified flying object"</a> [wikipedia.org] -- with the most salient characteristic being "unidentified". Although UFO sightings are often associated with (assumed) extraterrestrial phenomena, this is not necessary for the label. An unidentified object in the sky is still a UFO regardless of origin (and typically will no longer be considered a UFO when identified, even if alien/extraterrestrial).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are seriously mistaken .
UFO stands for " unidentified flying object " [ wikipedia.org ] -- with the most salient characteristic being " unidentified " .
Although UFO sightings are often associated with ( assumed ) extraterrestrial phenomena , this is not necessary for the label .
An unidentified object in the sky is still a UFO regardless of origin ( and typically will no longer be considered a UFO when identified , even if alien/extraterrestrial ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are seriously mistaken.
UFO stands for "unidentified flying object" [wikipedia.org] -- with the most salient characteristic being "unidentified".
Although UFO sightings are often associated with (assumed) extraterrestrial phenomena, this is not necessary for the label.
An unidentified object in the sky is still a UFO regardless of origin (and typically will no longer be considered a UFO when identified, even if alien/extraterrestrial).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30385202</id>
	<title>Hrmf...</title>
	<author>a\_nonamiss</author>
	<datestamp>1259605380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I stared at that spinning little ball of light for like 3 minutes before I realized it was just waiting for the video to load.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I stared at that spinning little ball of light for like 3 minutes before I realized it was just waiting for the video to load .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I stared at that spinning little ball of light for like 3 minutes before I realized it was just waiting for the video to load.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380486</id>
	<title>Other explanations</title>
	<author>HangingChad</author>
	<datestamp>1259573640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another possible explanation is that the original rocket was a target drone with rocket assisted take off.  The light could have been a ground laser engaging the drone.  If you've ever seen a test of a large scale laser, you can't really tell if the beam originates on the ground or from the target, if you can see it at all.

</p><p>Although a 10 minute kill time challenges that theory.  A laser anti-aircraft weapon for engaging targets that conveniently linger over the target area for an extended period of time.  Not exactly a Death Star, is it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another possible explanation is that the original rocket was a target drone with rocket assisted take off .
The light could have been a ground laser engaging the drone .
If you 've ever seen a test of a large scale laser , you ca n't really tell if the beam originates on the ground or from the target , if you can see it at all .
Although a 10 minute kill time challenges that theory .
A laser anti-aircraft weapon for engaging targets that conveniently linger over the target area for an extended period of time .
Not exactly a Death Star , is it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another possible explanation is that the original rocket was a target drone with rocket assisted take off.
The light could have been a ground laser engaging the drone.
If you've ever seen a test of a large scale laser, you can't really tell if the beam originates on the ground or from the target, if you can see it at all.
Although a 10 minute kill time challenges that theory.
A laser anti-aircraft weapon for engaging targets that conveniently linger over the target area for an extended period of time.
Not exactly a Death Star, is it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30390630</id>
	<title>It was a Russian ICBM test.</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1260469800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
The Russians have admitted it was an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/12/10/world/international-us-russia-missile-failure.html" title="nytimes.com">ICBM test.</a> [nytimes.com]  They were trying a launch from a nuclear submarine from a submerged position in the White Sea.  The third stage of the ICBM failed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Russians have admitted it was an ICBM test .
[ nytimes.com ] They were trying a launch from a nuclear submarine from a submerged position in the White Sea .
The third stage of the ICBM failed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
The Russians have admitted it was an ICBM test.
[nytimes.com]  They were trying a launch from a nuclear submarine from a submerged position in the White Sea.
The third stage of the ICBM failed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384582</id>
	<title>A rocket, or a GIANT TREBUCHET???</title>
	<author>RonTheHurler</author>
	<datestamp>1259598000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The same effect, via trebuchet.</p><p>Somewhere deep in the California desert, at a super secret test site.....</p><p>
&nbsp; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sMIO15gCQI" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sMIO15gCQI</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The same effect , via trebuchet.Somewhere deep in the California desert , at a super secret test site.... .   http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 6sMIO15gCQI [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The same effect, via trebuchet.Somewhere deep in the California desert, at a super secret test site.....
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sMIO15gCQI [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381634</id>
	<title>The sky is buffering....</title>
	<author>e-scetic</author>
	<datestamp>1259578680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...a la Youtube.

Weren't the Russians experimenting with a type of wobbly missile with an unpredictable trajectory?

And wouldn't a perfect spherical explosion like that mean it took place in zero gravity?

Otherwise, must be nice living next to the wormhole.  Your pagh is strong, my son.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...a la Youtube .
Were n't the Russians experimenting with a type of wobbly missile with an unpredictable trajectory ?
And would n't a perfect spherical explosion like that mean it took place in zero gravity ?
Otherwise , must be nice living next to the wormhole .
Your pagh is strong , my son .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...a la Youtube.
Weren't the Russians experimenting with a type of wobbly missile with an unpredictable trajectory?
And wouldn't a perfect spherical explosion like that mean it took place in zero gravity?
Otherwise, must be nice living next to the wormhole.
Your pagh is strong, my son.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30443396</id>
	<title>Norway Spiral announcing Maitreya's emergence</title>
	<author>magicstar</author>
	<datestamp>1260889200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This phenomenon is a sign that today we live in a most extraordinary time in history.</p><p>Some will know that a year has passed since Share International released a <a href="http://www.share-international.org/maitreya/Ma\_starsign.htm#Anchor-Christmas-47857" title="share-international.org" rel="nofollow">news release</a> [share-international.org], where they predicted that very soon a bright star-like sign would appear in our skies, visible day and night. This 'star' was to be similar in its nature to the biblical Star of Bethlehem - announcing that a great teacher for our time is among us and is ready to step forward into the public, having his first public interview on one of the major american television networks.<br>Many will also know that such a 'star' has indeed appeared not a month after the prediction, and that Share International magazine has every month since then published a number of <a href="http://www.share-international.org/maitreya/Ma\_starsign.htm#Anchor-Share-49575" title="share-international.org" rel="nofollow">photos and reports</a> [share-international.org] of the 'star', coming from all parts of the world. Likewise many people uploaded their own <a href="http://www.youtube.com/view\_play\_list?p=D4EA94182D8B7422" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">videos and reports to</a> [youtube.com] and talked about it on forums and blogs.<br>The <a href="http://www.share-international.org/maitreya/Ma\_starsign.htm#nr91" title="share-international.org" rel="nofollow">latest information</a> [share-international.org] from Share International is that this spiral over Norway was yet another instance of the 'star', this time showing itself in such a spectacular way. Further such manifestations are to be expected in the near future.<br>See <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuuMOvy1KNE" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">"The 'Star' Sign" on</a> [youtube.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This phenomenon is a sign that today we live in a most extraordinary time in history.Some will know that a year has passed since Share International released a news release [ share-international.org ] , where they predicted that very soon a bright star-like sign would appear in our skies , visible day and night .
This 'star ' was to be similar in its nature to the biblical Star of Bethlehem - announcing that a great teacher for our time is among us and is ready to step forward into the public , having his first public interview on one of the major american television networks.Many will also know that such a 'star ' has indeed appeared not a month after the prediction , and that Share International magazine has every month since then published a number of photos and reports [ share-international.org ] of the 'star ' , coming from all parts of the world .
Likewise many people uploaded their own videos and reports to [ youtube.com ] and talked about it on forums and blogs.The latest information [ share-international.org ] from Share International is that this spiral over Norway was yet another instance of the 'star ' , this time showing itself in such a spectacular way .
Further such manifestations are to be expected in the near future.See " The 'Star ' Sign " on [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This phenomenon is a sign that today we live in a most extraordinary time in history.Some will know that a year has passed since Share International released a news release [share-international.org], where they predicted that very soon a bright star-like sign would appear in our skies, visible day and night.
This 'star' was to be similar in its nature to the biblical Star of Bethlehem - announcing that a great teacher for our time is among us and is ready to step forward into the public, having his first public interview on one of the major american television networks.Many will also know that such a 'star' has indeed appeared not a month after the prediction, and that Share International magazine has every month since then published a number of photos and reports [share-international.org] of the 'star', coming from all parts of the world.
Likewise many people uploaded their own videos and reports to [youtube.com] and talked about it on forums and blogs.The latest information [share-international.org] from Share International is that this spiral over Norway was yet another instance of the 'star', this time showing itself in such a spectacular way.
Further such manifestations are to be expected in the near future.See "The 'Star' Sign" on [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30408174</id>
	<title>ShareAndSaveTheWorld</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260532980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On 12 December 2008 Share International Foundation announced that a large, bright star would soon be seen worldwide. It is a sign heralding the imminent appearance of Maitreya, the World Teacher, on US television.<br>The 'star' is really one of four enormous spacecraft placed around the world to allow people everywhere to witness this extraordinary phenomenon. Sightings are increasingly being reported.<br>"In the very near future, people everywhere will have the opportunity to witness an extraordinary and significant sign, the like of which has been manifested only once before, at the birth of Jesus. Then, according to Christian teaching, a star appeared in the heavens and led three wise men from the East to the birthplace of Jesus. Soon, once again, a star-like luminary of brilliant power will be seen around the world." (Benjamin Creme's Master, Share International magazine, Jan/Feb 2009)<br>See "The 'star' sign" video on YouTube or visit Share International website.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On 12 December 2008 Share International Foundation announced that a large , bright star would soon be seen worldwide .
It is a sign heralding the imminent appearance of Maitreya , the World Teacher , on US television.The 'star ' is really one of four enormous spacecraft placed around the world to allow people everywhere to witness this extraordinary phenomenon .
Sightings are increasingly being reported .
" In the very near future , people everywhere will have the opportunity to witness an extraordinary and significant sign , the like of which has been manifested only once before , at the birth of Jesus .
Then , according to Christian teaching , a star appeared in the heavens and led three wise men from the East to the birthplace of Jesus .
Soon , once again , a star-like luminary of brilliant power will be seen around the world .
" ( Benjamin Creme 's Master , Share International magazine , Jan/Feb 2009 ) See " The 'star ' sign " video on YouTube or visit Share International website .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On 12 December 2008 Share International Foundation announced that a large, bright star would soon be seen worldwide.
It is a sign heralding the imminent appearance of Maitreya, the World Teacher, on US television.The 'star' is really one of four enormous spacecraft placed around the world to allow people everywhere to witness this extraordinary phenomenon.
Sightings are increasingly being reported.
"In the very near future, people everywhere will have the opportunity to witness an extraordinary and significant sign, the like of which has been manifested only once before, at the birth of Jesus.
Then, according to Christian teaching, a star appeared in the heavens and led three wise men from the East to the birthplace of Jesus.
Soon, once again, a star-like luminary of brilliant power will be seen around the world.
" (Benjamin Creme's Master, Share International magazine, Jan/Feb 2009)See "The 'star' sign" video on YouTube or visit Share International website.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381264</id>
	<title>Re:WoW's new raid instance...</title>
	<author>D Ninja</author>
	<datestamp>1259577180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Crap.  There are no flight points near by.  WTB summons to Norway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Crap .
There are no flight points near by .
WTB summons to Norway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Crap.
There are no flight points near by.
WTB summons to Norway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381340</id>
	<title>E.T. + 12 foot tall lizards are REAL</title>
	<author>ub3r n3u7r4l1st</author>
	<datestamp>1259577480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I feel sorry for that school superintendent who got fired for running SETI@home on his school computer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel sorry for that school superintendent who got fired for running SETI @ home on his school computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel sorry for that school superintendent who got fired for running SETI@home on his school computer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380642</id>
	<title>Pierce the Heavens With Your Drill! -</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't believe in yourself, believe in me who believes in you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't believe in yourself , believe in me who believes in you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't believe in yourself, believe in me who believes in you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492</id>
	<title>Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket!</title>
	<author>dtolman</author>
	<datestamp>1259573700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got this from the BA forum:</p><p>Blogs / Bad Astronomy<br>
 Terra spots a volcanic plume<br>Awesomely bizarre light show freaks out Norway<br>submit to reddit</p><p>[UPDATE: See bottom of post; I knew it!]</p><p>Earlier in the morning today (around 8:00 a.m. local time) this weird thing was seen over the skies of Norway:</p><p>norway\_spiral</p><p>My first reaction when I saw that was, "What the FRAK is THAT?!" My second thought was, "Photoshop". But then I saw lots of pictures of this on a bunch of different Norwegian media, so I don't think it's a digital hoax. Then videos started surfacing, like this one, which clearly show the spiral spinning. It's not just a static picture, whatever this thing was; it was really in the sky.</p><p>However, after a moment, I realized this must be a rocket, most likely spiraling out of control. I don't understand all the details -- I don't have all the info yet -- but a rocket fits what we're seeing here. First, this was seen all over Norway, so it must have been at a high altitude to be so visible. Second, the blue spiral angling down to the right is clearly due to perspective. A rocket spiraling around, and coming up from the lower right, would appear to make tight spirals when it was far away and bigger ones as it got closer.</p><p>Third, you can actually see the bright white spiral spinning in the videos. That threw me for a second, to be honest, but after a moment I figured that it makes sense if the rocket is headed more or less straight toward the camera. Whatever it is being lit up (exhaust, or a leaking payload?) would appear to expand in a spiral like water from a spinning sprinklerhead. The spiral itself is not spinning any more than water from the sprinkler is; that's an illusion of motion.</p><p>norway\_spiral2Fourth, after a few moments, a black disk appears to expand in the center of the white spiral, as seen in this picture (it's a little fuzzy; you can see the person taking it must have used a long exposure because foreground lights are jittery, but you get the idea). That's exactly what I would expect if whatever is being ejected by the rocket ran out; the arms of the spiral would expand away from the center, leaving black emptiness in the middle.</p><p>So that's my hypothesis. A rocket got out of control, perhaps losing a stabilizer, and started to spiral. The two spirals, different in shape, size, and color, indicate something happened in the middle of all this (the rocket second stage fired while still spinning, or something else started leaking out), changing the rocket's direction. Then, when the fuel or whatever ran out, the white spiral began to disappear from the inside out as the material expanded in space.</p><p>So who launched it? The Russians are a likely guess, but -shocker -- they're denying it. I'd love to know and find out what the details are, but whoever shot it up and whatever the purpose, I'm pretty sure what we're seeing here is a rocket launch that didn't go exactly according to plan.</p><p>Note: there are a lot of stories online about this with more very cool pictures: The Sun and The Daily Mail have it in English, while Norwegian media include VG Nett, Altaposten.no, NRK.no, Framtidinord.no, Nordlis.no, and amazing videos can be seen here and here.</p><p>UPDATE: From Doctor Atlantis I heard of this video which simulates particles being spewed out from a spinning rocket booster. Look familiar?</p><p>Photos: Jan Petter J&#248;rgensen and Morten Kristiansen. Tip o' the payload bay to the many folks who alerted me to this story!</p><p>December 9th, 2009 10:47 AM Tags: Norway, rocket<br>by Phil Plait in Antiscience, Cool stuff, Pretty pictures, Skepticism | 58 comments | RSS feed | Trackback &gt;<br>58 Responses to "Awesomely bizarre light show freaks out Norway"</p><p>
   1. 1.   Kevin Says:<br>
      December 9th, 2009 at 10:53 am</p><p>
      That reminds me of something we saw waaay back in the late 1980's during a public night at our observatory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got this from the BA forum : Blogs / Bad Astronomy Terra spots a volcanic plumeAwesomely bizarre light show freaks out Norwaysubmit to reddit [ UPDATE : See bottom of post ; I knew it !
] Earlier in the morning today ( around 8 : 00 a.m. local time ) this weird thing was seen over the skies of Norway : norway \ _spiralMy first reaction when I saw that was , " What the FRAK is THAT ? !
" My second thought was , " Photoshop " .
But then I saw lots of pictures of this on a bunch of different Norwegian media , so I do n't think it 's a digital hoax .
Then videos started surfacing , like this one , which clearly show the spiral spinning .
It 's not just a static picture , whatever this thing was ; it was really in the sky.However , after a moment , I realized this must be a rocket , most likely spiraling out of control .
I do n't understand all the details -- I do n't have all the info yet -- but a rocket fits what we 're seeing here .
First , this was seen all over Norway , so it must have been at a high altitude to be so visible .
Second , the blue spiral angling down to the right is clearly due to perspective .
A rocket spiraling around , and coming up from the lower right , would appear to make tight spirals when it was far away and bigger ones as it got closer.Third , you can actually see the bright white spiral spinning in the videos .
That threw me for a second , to be honest , but after a moment I figured that it makes sense if the rocket is headed more or less straight toward the camera .
Whatever it is being lit up ( exhaust , or a leaking payload ?
) would appear to expand in a spiral like water from a spinning sprinklerhead .
The spiral itself is not spinning any more than water from the sprinkler is ; that 's an illusion of motion.norway \ _spiral2Fourth , after a few moments , a black disk appears to expand in the center of the white spiral , as seen in this picture ( it 's a little fuzzy ; you can see the person taking it must have used a long exposure because foreground lights are jittery , but you get the idea ) .
That 's exactly what I would expect if whatever is being ejected by the rocket ran out ; the arms of the spiral would expand away from the center , leaving black emptiness in the middle.So that 's my hypothesis .
A rocket got out of control , perhaps losing a stabilizer , and started to spiral .
The two spirals , different in shape , size , and color , indicate something happened in the middle of all this ( the rocket second stage fired while still spinning , or something else started leaking out ) , changing the rocket 's direction .
Then , when the fuel or whatever ran out , the white spiral began to disappear from the inside out as the material expanded in space.So who launched it ?
The Russians are a likely guess , but -shocker -- they 're denying it .
I 'd love to know and find out what the details are , but whoever shot it up and whatever the purpose , I 'm pretty sure what we 're seeing here is a rocket launch that did n't go exactly according to plan.Note : there are a lot of stories online about this with more very cool pictures : The Sun and The Daily Mail have it in English , while Norwegian media include VG Nett , Altaposten.no , NRK.no , Framtidinord.no , Nordlis.no , and amazing videos can be seen here and here.UPDATE : From Doctor Atlantis I heard of this video which simulates particles being spewed out from a spinning rocket booster .
Look familiar ? Photos : Jan Petter J   rgensen and Morten Kristiansen .
Tip o ' the payload bay to the many folks who alerted me to this story ! December 9th , 2009 10 : 47 AM Tags : Norway , rocketby Phil Plait in Antiscience , Cool stuff , Pretty pictures , Skepticism | 58 comments | RSS feed | Trackback &gt; 58 Responses to " Awesomely bizarre light show freaks out Norway " 1 .
1. Kevin Says : December 9th , 2009 at 10 : 53 am That reminds me of something we saw waaay back in the late 1980 's during a public night at our observatory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got this from the BA forum:Blogs / Bad Astronomy
 Terra spots a volcanic plumeAwesomely bizarre light show freaks out Norwaysubmit to reddit[UPDATE: See bottom of post; I knew it!
]Earlier in the morning today (around 8:00 a.m. local time) this weird thing was seen over the skies of Norway:norway\_spiralMy first reaction when I saw that was, "What the FRAK is THAT?!
" My second thought was, "Photoshop".
But then I saw lots of pictures of this on a bunch of different Norwegian media, so I don't think it's a digital hoax.
Then videos started surfacing, like this one, which clearly show the spiral spinning.
It's not just a static picture, whatever this thing was; it was really in the sky.However, after a moment, I realized this must be a rocket, most likely spiraling out of control.
I don't understand all the details -- I don't have all the info yet -- but a rocket fits what we're seeing here.
First, this was seen all over Norway, so it must have been at a high altitude to be so visible.
Second, the blue spiral angling down to the right is clearly due to perspective.
A rocket spiraling around, and coming up from the lower right, would appear to make tight spirals when it was far away and bigger ones as it got closer.Third, you can actually see the bright white spiral spinning in the videos.
That threw me for a second, to be honest, but after a moment I figured that it makes sense if the rocket is headed more or less straight toward the camera.
Whatever it is being lit up (exhaust, or a leaking payload?
) would appear to expand in a spiral like water from a spinning sprinklerhead.
The spiral itself is not spinning any more than water from the sprinkler is; that's an illusion of motion.norway\_spiral2Fourth, after a few moments, a black disk appears to expand in the center of the white spiral, as seen in this picture (it's a little fuzzy; you can see the person taking it must have used a long exposure because foreground lights are jittery, but you get the idea).
That's exactly what I would expect if whatever is being ejected by the rocket ran out; the arms of the spiral would expand away from the center, leaving black emptiness in the middle.So that's my hypothesis.
A rocket got out of control, perhaps losing a stabilizer, and started to spiral.
The two spirals, different in shape, size, and color, indicate something happened in the middle of all this (the rocket second stage fired while still spinning, or something else started leaking out), changing the rocket's direction.
Then, when the fuel or whatever ran out, the white spiral began to disappear from the inside out as the material expanded in space.So who launched it?
The Russians are a likely guess, but -shocker -- they're denying it.
I'd love to know and find out what the details are, but whoever shot it up and whatever the purpose, I'm pretty sure what we're seeing here is a rocket launch that didn't go exactly according to plan.Note: there are a lot of stories online about this with more very cool pictures: The Sun and The Daily Mail have it in English, while Norwegian media include VG Nett, Altaposten.no, NRK.no, Framtidinord.no, Nordlis.no, and amazing videos can be seen here and here.UPDATE: From Doctor Atlantis I heard of this video which simulates particles being spewed out from a spinning rocket booster.
Look familiar?Photos: Jan Petter Jørgensen and Morten Kristiansen.
Tip o' the payload bay to the many folks who alerted me to this story!December 9th, 2009 10:47 AM Tags: Norway, rocketby Phil Plait in Antiscience, Cool stuff, Pretty pictures, Skepticism | 58 comments | RSS feed | Trackback &gt;58 Responses to "Awesomely bizarre light show freaks out Norway"
   1.
1.   Kevin Says:
      December 9th, 2009 at 10:53 am
      That reminds me of something we saw waaay back in the late 1980's during a public night at our observatory.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382018</id>
	<title>Nice special effects...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259580540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but I think that thing could be easily made with one heck of a big projector. That would explain the blue cone leading to the ground.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...but I think that thing could be easily made with one heck of a big projector .
That would explain the blue cone leading to the ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but I think that thing could be easily made with one heck of a big projector.
That would explain the blue cone leading to the ground.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>dominious</author>
	<datestamp>1259578200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It was a rocket indeed: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56\_Bulava#2009" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56\_Bulava#2009</a> [wikipedia.org] <br>
Read the third paragraph...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a rocket indeed : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56 \ _Bulava # 2009 [ wikipedia.org ] Read the third paragraph.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a rocket indeed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56\_Bulava#2009 [wikipedia.org] 
Read the third paragraph...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380912</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>Jeppe Salvesen</author>
	<datestamp>1259575740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In fact, the vast majority of UFOs have been proven to originate from earth. That is, all that have been identified and thus are no longer unidentified. We cannot from the observations rule out extraterrestrial visitors, but it appears to be pretty unlikely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact , the vast majority of UFOs have been proven to originate from earth .
That is , all that have been identified and thus are no longer unidentified .
We can not from the observations rule out extraterrestrial visitors , but it appears to be pretty unlikely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fact, the vast majority of UFOs have been proven to originate from earth.
That is, all that have been identified and thus are no longer unidentified.
We cannot from the observations rule out extraterrestrial visitors, but it appears to be pretty unlikely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380652</id>
	<title>light show</title>
	<author>jn0149</author>
	<datestamp>1259574480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>or maybe its a light show with artistic and strong projectors</htmltext>
<tokenext>or maybe its a light show with artistic and strong projectors</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or maybe its a light show with artistic and strong projectors</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382366</id>
	<title>OMG THE DREAMCAST IS BACK</title>
	<author>PaganRitual</author>
	<datestamp>1259582280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I knew that never giving up on the GREATEST CONSOLE OF ALL TIME would reward me in the end.</p><p>THE DREAMCAST IS BACK PEOPLE, BOW BEFORE YOUR NEW GAMING GOD.</p><p>I love Sega.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew that never giving up on the GREATEST CONSOLE OF ALL TIME would reward me in the end.THE DREAMCAST IS BACK PEOPLE , BOW BEFORE YOUR NEW GAMING GOD.I love Sega .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew that never giving up on the GREATEST CONSOLE OF ALL TIME would reward me in the end.THE DREAMCAST IS BACK PEOPLE, BOW BEFORE YOUR NEW GAMING GOD.I love Sega.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30400060</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>ct1972</author>
	<datestamp>1260535500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, a UFO is just an <strong>Unidentified</strong> flying object. If it's a "flying saucer" or known to be some space object, then it's an <strong>identified</strong> flying object<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-).</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , a UFO is just an Unidentified flying object .
If it 's a " flying saucer " or known to be some space object , then it 's an identified flying object : - ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, a UFO is just an Unidentified flying object.
If it's a "flying saucer" or known to be some space object, then it's an identified flying object :-).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386748</id>
	<title>Re:It's the LHC</title>
	<author>3waygeek</author>
	<datestamp>1260450360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great; it's not like we don't have more than enough bogons as is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great ; it 's not like we do n't have more than enough bogons as is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great; it's not like we don't have more than enough bogons as is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384238</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259594700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bah, norse nonsense... it's clearly <a href="http://www.venganza.org/" title="venganza.org" rel="nofollow">His Noodly Appendage</a> [venganza.org]...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bah , norse nonsense... it 's clearly His Noodly Appendage [ venganza.org ] .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bah, norse nonsense... it's clearly His Noodly Appendage [venganza.org]...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382628</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1259583720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can't prove it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't prove it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't prove it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381924</id>
	<title>Russians have power back on</title>
	<author>AHuxley</author>
	<datestamp>1259580120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Found some cash and fired up haarp? <br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvr9ieFf-Fw" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvr9ieFf-Fw</a> [youtube.com] <br>
Few months it was over Moscow.<br>
USA tires to hit 1 rocket with another.<br>
Russia melts the sky.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Found some cash and fired up haarp ?
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = jvr9ieFf-Fw [ youtube.com ] Few months it was over Moscow .
USA tires to hit 1 rocket with another .
Russia melts the sky .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Found some cash and fired up haarp?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvr9ieFf-Fw [youtube.com] 
Few months it was over Moscow.
USA tires to hit 1 rocket with another.
Russia melts the sky.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384054</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>hoffmanbike</author>
	<datestamp>1259593020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The storm had now definitely abated and what thunder there was now rumbled over more distant hills, like a man saying "and another thing" twenty minutes after admitting he's lost the argument. - Douglas Adams


sorry your references were too similar to the continuation of THGTTG... Odin and Loki.. I choose Thor dammit!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The storm had now definitely abated and what thunder there was now rumbled over more distant hills , like a man saying " and another thing " twenty minutes after admitting he 's lost the argument .
- Douglas Adams sorry your references were too similar to the continuation of THGTTG... Odin and Loki.. I choose Thor dammit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The storm had now definitely abated and what thunder there was now rumbled over more distant hills, like a man saying "and another thing" twenty minutes after admitting he's lost the argument.
- Douglas Adams


sorry your references were too similar to the continuation of THGTTG... Odin and Loki.. I choose Thor dammit!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382136</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>tinker\_taylor</author>
	<datestamp>1259581140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Er...that's because it was an UGO (Unconfirmed Ground Orifice)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Er...that 's because it was an UGO ( Unconfirmed Ground Orifice )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Er...that's because it was an UGO (Unconfirmed Ground Orifice)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380430</id>
	<title>It's the LHC</title>
	<author>wiredog</author>
	<datestamp>1259573400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sending Bogons back from the Future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sending Bogons back from the Future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sending Bogons back from the Future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30390228</id>
	<title>Now that we all know that it was a Russki rocket..</title>
	<author>Mr. Firewall</author>
	<datestamp>1260468540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I meant to post this last night and never got around to it, but I was going to say, "Nah, it's the Nobel Peace Prize committee spinning out of control with regret!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I meant to post this last night and never got around to it , but I was going to say , " Nah , it 's the Nobel Peace Prize committee spinning out of control with regret !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I meant to post this last night and never got around to it, but I was going to say, "Nah, it's the Nobel Peace Prize committee spinning out of control with regret!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382270</id>
	<title>Re:Spinning beach ball of death</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259581740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or they were successful. How would we know?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or they were successful .
How would we know ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or they were successful.
How would we know?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380786</id>
	<title>Hey Norway</title>
	<author>r00tw00t</author>
	<datestamp>1259575140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ubisoft called it wants its logo back!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ubisoft called it wants its logo back !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ubisoft called it wants its logo back!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381592</id>
	<title>It's a sign! Repent!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259578440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh ye all who use Ubuntu:<br>Repent!<br>I've seen the shape of things to come...<br>And it's Debian.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh ye all who use Ubuntu : Repent ! I 've seen the shape of things to come...And it 's Debian .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh ye all who use Ubuntu:Repent!I've seen the shape of things to come...And it's Debian.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383358</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>Oyjord</author>
	<datestamp>1259588100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>The reason nobody's mentioned UFOs yet is because whatever it was originated from the Earth.</p></div><p>No, the reason nobody's mentioned UFOs yet is because this phenomenon was spotted over Norway, not Arkansas.</p></div><p>Bazinga!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason nobody 's mentioned UFOs yet is because whatever it was originated from the Earth.No , the reason nobody 's mentioned UFOs yet is because this phenomenon was spotted over Norway , not Arkansas.Bazinga !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason nobody's mentioned UFOs yet is because whatever it was originated from the Earth.No, the reason nobody's mentioned UFOs yet is because this phenomenon was spotted over Norway, not Arkansas.Bazinga!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382784</id>
	<title>Please, its SO obvious</title>
	<author>alexborges</author>
	<datestamp>1259584620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its a higgs bosson traveling back to its time (to the future!), to get reinforcements to finally kill the evil LHC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its a higgs bosson traveling back to its time ( to the future !
) , to get reinforcements to finally kill the evil LHC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its a higgs bosson traveling back to its time (to the future!
), to get reinforcements to finally kill the evil LHC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380716</id>
	<title>Reflected Sunlight</title>
	<author>capn\_planet</author>
	<datestamp>1259574780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr><tt>...The spiral, he claimed, was the result of light reflecting on the leaking fuel. He was quoted as saying the light was sunlight, despite the strange lights showing up at night.</tt></p> </div><p>I don't see why this is so far-fetched - it would make sense that a missile at high altitude just before sunrise would shine, since "sunrise" has already occurred at high elevation where earth's shadow no longer obscures the sun. (The event happened around 8:00am)

 <a href="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap070603.html" title="nasa.gov" rel="nofollow">Compare it to a view of a shuttle launch just after sunset:</a> [nasa.gov]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...The spiral , he claimed , was the result of light reflecting on the leaking fuel .
He was quoted as saying the light was sunlight , despite the strange lights showing up at night .
I do n't see why this is so far-fetched - it would make sense that a missile at high altitude just before sunrise would shine , since " sunrise " has already occurred at high elevation where earth 's shadow no longer obscures the sun .
( The event happened around 8 : 00am ) Compare it to a view of a shuttle launch just after sunset : [ nasa.gov ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...The spiral, he claimed, was the result of light reflecting on the leaking fuel.
He was quoted as saying the light was sunlight, despite the strange lights showing up at night.
I don't see why this is so far-fetched - it would make sense that a missile at high altitude just before sunrise would shine, since "sunrise" has already occurred at high elevation where earth's shadow no longer obscures the sun.
(The event happened around 8:00am)

 Compare it to a view of a shuttle launch just after sunset: [nasa.gov]
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380694</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>gyrogeerloose</author>
	<datestamp>1259574720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The reason nobody's mentioned UFOs yet is because whatever it was originated from the Earth.</p></div><p>No, the reason nobody's mentioned UFOs yet is because this phenomenon was spotted over Norway, not Arkansas.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason nobody 's mentioned UFOs yet is because whatever it was originated from the Earth.No , the reason nobody 's mentioned UFOs yet is because this phenomenon was spotted over Norway , not Arkansas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason nobody's mentioned UFOs yet is because whatever it was originated from the Earth.No, the reason nobody's mentioned UFOs yet is because this phenomenon was spotted over Norway, not Arkansas.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380532</id>
	<title>I, for one, welcome our alien overlords</title>
	<author>meowhous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This ought to excite all those who expected Obama to make an announcement around Thanksgiving that ETs are real...</htmltext>
<tokenext>This ought to excite all those who expected Obama to make an announcement around Thanksgiving that ETs are real.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This ought to excite all those who expected Obama to make an announcement around Thanksgiving that ETs are real...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380952</id>
	<title>God installed the 60's wallpaper/screensaver</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259575920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...I told you he was a liberal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...I told you he was a liberal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I told you he was a liberal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382394</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259582400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'Cause, ya know, wikipedia's never wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'Cause , ya know , wikipedia 's never wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Cause, ya know, wikipedia's never wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381336</id>
	<title>Re:Swirly Thing Alert!</title>
	<author>uuddlrlrab</author>
	<datestamp>1259577480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This should be simple enough to resolve. We just use Photoshop to swirl the <a href="http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Swirl\_Face" title="encycloped...matica.com">opposite direction...</a> [encycloped...matica.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This should be simple enough to resolve .
We just use Photoshop to swirl the opposite direction... [ encycloped...matica.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This should be simple enough to resolve.
We just use Photoshop to swirl the opposite direction... [encycloped...matica.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382860</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259585040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, what kind of fundamentalist modded me down?  Was it a Jewish fundamentalist, a Christian fundamentalist, a Muslim fundamentalist, or a Obamaist fundamentalist?  By demonstrating that you have trouble tolerating dissenting opinions, you are only strenghtening my point.  Oh well, maybe a Norse fundamentalist will mod me up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , what kind of fundamentalist modded me down ?
Was it a Jewish fundamentalist , a Christian fundamentalist , a Muslim fundamentalist , or a Obamaist fundamentalist ?
By demonstrating that you have trouble tolerating dissenting opinions , you are only strenghtening my point .
Oh well , maybe a Norse fundamentalist will mod me up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, what kind of fundamentalist modded me down?
Was it a Jewish fundamentalist, a Christian fundamentalist, a Muslim fundamentalist, or a Obamaist fundamentalist?
By demonstrating that you have trouble tolerating dissenting opinions, you are only strenghtening my point.
Oh well, maybe a Norse fundamentalist will mod me up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384242</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259594760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the Wiki article on the RSM-56 Russian ICBM</p><p>"The Russian military developed Bulava to possess advanced defense capabilities making it nearly impervious to existing and future missile-defense systems. Among its claimed abilities are evasive maneuvering, mid-course countermeasures and decoys and a warhead fully shielded against both physical and Electromagnetic pulse damage. The Bulava is designed to be capable of surviving a nuclear blast at a minimum distance of 500 meters.[3] Prime minister Putin has claimed that Bulava could penetrate any potential anti-missile defence system."</p><p>That could explain the light, they could be testing its defensive capabilities against a newer missile defense system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the Wiki article on the RSM-56 Russian ICBM " The Russian military developed Bulava to possess advanced defense capabilities making it nearly impervious to existing and future missile-defense systems .
Among its claimed abilities are evasive maneuvering , mid-course countermeasures and decoys and a warhead fully shielded against both physical and Electromagnetic pulse damage .
The Bulava is designed to be capable of surviving a nuclear blast at a minimum distance of 500 meters .
[ 3 ] Prime minister Putin has claimed that Bulava could penetrate any potential anti-missile defence system .
" That could explain the light , they could be testing its defensive capabilities against a newer missile defense system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the Wiki article on the RSM-56 Russian ICBM"The Russian military developed Bulava to possess advanced defense capabilities making it nearly impervious to existing and future missile-defense systems.
Among its claimed abilities are evasive maneuvering, mid-course countermeasures and decoys and a warhead fully shielded against both physical and Electromagnetic pulse damage.
The Bulava is designed to be capable of surviving a nuclear blast at a minimum distance of 500 meters.
[3] Prime minister Putin has claimed that Bulava could penetrate any potential anti-missile defence system.
"That could explain the light, they could be testing its defensive capabilities against a newer missile defense system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382380</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>who knows my name</author>
	<datestamp>1259582340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>bah, it's unconfirmed [citation needed]. Russians aren't going to confirm or deny it yet...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>bah , it 's unconfirmed [ citation needed ] .
Russians are n't going to confirm or deny it yet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bah, it's unconfirmed [citation needed].
Russians aren't going to confirm or deny it yet...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380726</id>
	<title>It wasn't \_that\_ proton-m</title>
	<author>chebucto</author>
	<datestamp>1259574840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The dateline for the proton-m article is 2005 (which mentions satellite AMC-23), giving a launch date of Dec. 6, 2005. It even <a href="http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-140238836.html" title="encyclopedia.com">successfully launched!</a> [encyclopedia.com]. I'm pretty sure that particular rocket wasn't responsible for the light show.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The dateline for the proton-m article is 2005 ( which mentions satellite AMC-23 ) , giving a launch date of Dec. 6 , 2005 .
It even successfully launched !
[ encyclopedia.com ] . I 'm pretty sure that particular rocket was n't responsible for the light show .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The dateline for the proton-m article is 2005 (which mentions satellite AMC-23), giving a launch date of Dec. 6, 2005.
It even successfully launched!
[encyclopedia.com]. I'm pretty sure that particular rocket wasn't responsible for the light show.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380976</id>
	<title>Looks like a lot like Russia, 2006</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259576040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN\_y5r7vHio" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN\_y5r7vHio</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = VN \ _y5r7vHio [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN\_y5r7vHio [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381612</id>
	<title>Re:Protons are launched out of Baikonur</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259578560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the launch orbital inclination is above 90 degrees they would launch west. This orbital profile is great for weather or spy satellites that require a curtain angle of the sun in relation to the ground, or if a space telescope wants to spend more time behind the shadow of the earth.<br>Proton and Delta rockets launch these profile satellites quite often.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the launch orbital inclination is above 90 degrees they would launch west .
This orbital profile is great for weather or spy satellites that require a curtain angle of the sun in relation to the ground , or if a space telescope wants to spend more time behind the shadow of the earth.Proton and Delta rockets launch these profile satellites quite often .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the launch orbital inclination is above 90 degrees they would launch west.
This orbital profile is great for weather or spy satellites that require a curtain angle of the sun in relation to the ground, or if a space telescope wants to spend more time behind the shadow of the earth.Proton and Delta rockets launch these profile satellites quite often.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382646</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1259583780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I suspect this is actually the case, a link to a recently written paragraph with no citation on Wikipedia is hardly evidence.</p><p>Did you write that third paragraph yourself?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I suspect this is actually the case , a link to a recently written paragraph with no citation on Wikipedia is hardly evidence.Did you write that third paragraph yourself ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I suspect this is actually the case, a link to a recently written paragraph with no citation on Wikipedia is hardly evidence.Did you write that third paragraph yourself?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30385918</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>Jeppe Salvesen</author>
	<datestamp>1260438480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Celebrity astronomer. Nerdy, enthusiastic and endearing. Dunno if you can say he's popular, but pretty much everybody who watches TV knows who he is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Celebrity astronomer .
Nerdy , enthusiastic and endearing .
Dunno if you can say he 's popular , but pretty much everybody who watches TV knows who he is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Celebrity astronomer.
Nerdy, enthusiastic and endearing.
Dunno if you can say he's popular, but pretty much everybody who watches TV knows who he is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30385388</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>DavidTC</author>
	<datestamp>1259608680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lights, either projected onto the sky or naturally occurring, are not 'flying'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lights , either projected onto the sky or naturally occurring , are not 'flying' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lights, either projected onto the sky or naturally occurring, are not 'flying'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381956</id>
	<title>Re:Blue-green beam</title>
	<author>damburger</author>
	<datestamp>1259580300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seems unlikely that natural magnetic fields would be strong enough to create such a trajectory. More likely, the rocket aerodynamically disintegrated and that was some part that was venting, or perhaps an engine puffing out a last bit of thrust. That or a booster; recall how the two SRBs flew out of the fireball during the Challenger disaster.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems unlikely that natural magnetic fields would be strong enough to create such a trajectory .
More likely , the rocket aerodynamically disintegrated and that was some part that was venting , or perhaps an engine puffing out a last bit of thrust .
That or a booster ; recall how the two SRBs flew out of the fireball during the Challenger disaster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems unlikely that natural magnetic fields would be strong enough to create such a trajectory.
More likely, the rocket aerodynamically disintegrated and that was some part that was venting, or perhaps an engine puffing out a last bit of thrust.
That or a booster; recall how the two SRBs flew out of the fireball during the Challenger disaster.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380734</id>
	<title>Don't Worry</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1259574840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if you missed it, I'll sell you a <a href="http://www.istockphoto.com/file\_thumbview\_approve/8595481/2/istockphoto\_8595481-x-ray-glasses.jpg" title="istockphoto.com" rel="nofollow">pair of these</a> [istockphoto.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if you missed it , I 'll sell you a pair of these [ istockphoto.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if you missed it, I'll sell you a pair of these [istockphoto.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380986</id>
	<title>Happened in china some time ago also.</title>
	<author>voodoowizard</author>
	<datestamp>1259576040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This was posted a few months ago but I have no idea when it happened. Look similar...
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixLE3iuszbU" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixLE3iuszbU</a> [youtube.com]
Just skip to 35 seconds unless you can speak Chinese.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This was posted a few months ago but I have no idea when it happened .
Look similar.. . http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = ixLE3iuszbU [ youtube.com ] Just skip to 35 seconds unless you can speak Chinese .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was posted a few months ago but I have no idea when it happened.
Look similar...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixLE3iuszbU [youtube.com]
Just skip to 35 seconds unless you can speak Chinese.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382578</id>
	<title>Google twitter viral feed test ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259583360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google is testing their twitter realtime search feed.<br>This was accomplished with a highpowered light projector.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google is testing their twitter realtime search feed.This was accomplished with a highpowered light projector .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google is testing their twitter realtime search feed.This was accomplished with a highpowered light projector.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380790</id>
	<title>... just a laser light-show, friends! ...</title>
	<author>ninjagin</author>
	<datestamp>1259575140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It was some kids at the local polytechnic having some fun with a laser light-show projector. I saw the video.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was some kids at the local polytechnic having some fun with a laser light-show projector .
I saw the video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was some kids at the local polytechnic having some fun with a laser light-show projector.
I saw the video.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386970</id>
	<title>Most definately a rocket</title>
	<author>denebeim</author>
	<datestamp>1260452820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A few years ago I saw this: <a href="http://members.cox.net/starscopes/space\_sky/20050922\_vandenberg\_rocket\_launch.html" title="cox.net" rel="nofollow">http://members.cox.net/starscopes/space\_sky/20050922\_vandenberg\_rocket\_launch.html</a> [cox.net] while driving home from work.  It looks more or less identical to the photographs from Norway.  I can attest that it's an amazing site.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A few years ago I saw this : http : //members.cox.net/starscopes/space \ _sky/20050922 \ _vandenberg \ _rocket \ _launch.html [ cox.net ] while driving home from work .
It looks more or less identical to the photographs from Norway .
I can attest that it 's an amazing site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A few years ago I saw this: http://members.cox.net/starscopes/space\_sky/20050922\_vandenberg\_rocket\_launch.html [cox.net] while driving home from work.
It looks more or less identical to the photographs from Norway.
I can attest that it's an amazing site.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381722</id>
	<title>Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket!</title>
	<author>aminorex</author>
	<datestamp>1259579100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how the rocket managed to become headed "straight for" at least 3 different cameras distributed over hundreds of miles of subarctic islands.</p><p>BA is shoveling it high and deep.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how the rocket managed to become headed " straight for " at least 3 different cameras distributed over hundreds of miles of subarctic islands.BA is shoveling it high and deep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how the rocket managed to become headed "straight for" at least 3 different cameras distributed over hundreds of miles of subarctic islands.BA is shoveling it high and deep.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380550</id>
	<title>Spinning beach ball of death</title>
	<author>Vicegrip</author>
	<datestamp>1259574060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Damnit, apparently the earth is running OSX and somebody has tried to "undo" the last ten years; this has resulted in the spinning beach ball of death.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damnit , apparently the earth is running OSX and somebody has tried to " undo " the last ten years ; this has resulted in the spinning beach ball of death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damnit, apparently the earth is running OSX and somebody has tried to "undo" the last ten years; this has resulted in the spinning beach ball of death.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383646</id>
	<title>SO obvious -- LHC black hole</title>
	<author>Nicky G</author>
	<datestamp>1259589840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DUH...  The LHC gets fired up, and suddenly this kind of thing just randomly starts to happen?  Suuuuuure.</p><p>Clearly, this was a mini black hole spawned by the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, and indeed they ARE harmless and just disappear after a few moments, or else we wouldn't have this little thread going on here, now would we?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DUH... The LHC gets fired up , and suddenly this kind of thing just randomly starts to happen ?
Suuuuuure.Clearly , this was a mini black hole spawned by the Large Hadron Collider at CERN , and indeed they ARE harmless and just disappear after a few moments , or else we would n't have this little thread going on here , now would we ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DUH...  The LHC gets fired up, and suddenly this kind of thing just randomly starts to happen?
Suuuuuure.Clearly, this was a mini black hole spawned by the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, and indeed they ARE harmless and just disappear after a few moments, or else we wouldn't have this little thread going on here, now would we?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380810</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259575260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't UFO simply an acronym for "Unidentified flying object"?  I'm pretty sure this phenomenon counts as one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't UFO simply an acronym for " Unidentified flying object " ?
I 'm pretty sure this phenomenon counts as one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't UFO simply an acronym for "Unidentified flying object"?
I'm pretty sure this phenomenon counts as one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381250</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259577060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's right you know.  After all, it is Wednesday (Odinsday), the 9th day of the 12th month of the 9th year of the 3rd millenium.  That's pretty incontrovertible evidence, right there.  Certainly more incontrovertible than the evidence for any other religion, such as Judaism, Christianity, Islam or Obamaism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's right you know .
After all , it is Wednesday ( Odinsday ) , the 9th day of the 12th month of the 9th year of the 3rd millenium .
That 's pretty incontrovertible evidence , right there .
Certainly more incontrovertible than the evidence for any other religion , such as Judaism , Christianity , Islam or Obamaism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's right you know.
After all, it is Wednesday (Odinsday), the 9th day of the 12th month of the 9th year of the 3rd millenium.
That's pretty incontrovertible evidence, right there.
Certainly more incontrovertible than the evidence for any other religion, such as Judaism, Christianity, Islam or Obamaism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383642</id>
	<title>You haven't followed the recent events</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259589840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I distinctly missed the beginning of WWIII this morning, though to be fair it could have happened before my first cup of coffee.</p></div><p>I hope <a href="http://humon.deviantart.com/art/Climate-Conference-in-Copenhag-140180547" title="deviantart.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [deviantart.com] picture helps you understand what is happening over here. (From <a href="http://humon.deviantart.com/gallery/#Scandinavia-and-the-World" title="deviantart.com" rel="nofollow">Scandinavia and the World</a> [deviantart.com])</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I distinctly missed the beginning of WWIII this morning , though to be fair it could have happened before my first cup of coffee.I hope this [ deviantart.com ] picture helps you understand what is happening over here .
( From Scandinavia and the World [ deviantart.com ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I distinctly missed the beginning of WWIII this morning, though to be fair it could have happened before my first cup of coffee.I hope this [deviantart.com] picture helps you understand what is happening over here.
(From Scandinavia and the World [deviantart.com])
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381746</id>
	<title>Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket!</title>
	<author>arthurh3535</author>
	<datestamp>1259579220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More importantly, if it was an ICBM, why the hell didn't our different RADAR systems catch it at any point? We're supposed to have had this technology down to detect these sort of launches a long, long time ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More importantly , if it was an ICBM , why the hell did n't our different RADAR systems catch it at any point ?
We 're supposed to have had this technology down to detect these sort of launches a long , long time ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More importantly, if it was an ICBM, why the hell didn't our different RADAR systems catch it at any point?
We're supposed to have had this technology down to detect these sort of launches a long, long time ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383190</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1259586960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, no the vast majority of objects that are in the air and have not yet been identified originated from the ground, not space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , no the vast majority of objects that are in the air and have not yet been identified originated from the ground , not space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, no the vast majority of objects that are in the air and have not yet been identified originated from the ground, not space.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381092</id>
	<title>precursor to 2012</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259576400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(to all conspiracy theorist) it is the early sign of 2012<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( to all conspiracy theorist ) it is the early sign of 2012 : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(to all conspiracy theorist) it is the early sign of 2012 :P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380618</id>
	<title>I think it was NASA.</title>
	<author>dhudson0001</author>
	<datestamp>1259574360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obviously this is a result of what happened AFTER the helicopter hit the airbag.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously this is a result of what happened AFTER the helicopter hit the airbag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously this is a result of what happened AFTER the helicopter hit the airbag.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381972</id>
	<title>Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket!</title>
	<author>Matheus</author>
	<datestamp>1259580360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First of all: Thanks</p><p>Second: Really.. do you need to include the entire contents in your post?</p><p>Third: Is Russia getting sloppy in their old age?  If you are going to deny that something has occurred you may want to not have posted a NAVTEX preparing people for it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First of all : ThanksSecond : Really.. do you need to include the entire contents in your post ? Third : Is Russia getting sloppy in their old age ?
If you are going to deny that something has occurred you may want to not have posted a NAVTEX preparing people for it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First of all: ThanksSecond: Really.. do you need to include the entire contents in your post?Third: Is Russia getting sloppy in their old age?
If you are going to deny that something has occurred you may want to not have posted a NAVTEX preparing people for it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381442</id>
	<title>Keep one eye closed--Day of the Triffids!</title>
	<author>dpbsmith</author>
	<datestamp>1259577960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those who remember the very good John Wyndham novel "The Day of the Triffids" (later made into a very bad movie) will recall that the population of most of the civilized world is transfixed by a spectacular show of mysterious lights in the sky. The first-person narrator is stuck in a hospital recovering from eye surgery with patches over his eyes and feels frustrated at being left out.</p><p>A few days later it turns out that everyone who saw the lights has gone blind, leaving the narrator one of the few people in the world who can still see.</p><p>The story suggests but never says that it is some space-based weapons system that was accidentally deployed.</p><p>So, when viewing mysterious and spectacular unexplained lighting phenomena in the sky, perhaps it would be prudent to keep one eye closed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those who remember the very good John Wyndham novel " The Day of the Triffids " ( later made into a very bad movie ) will recall that the population of most of the civilized world is transfixed by a spectacular show of mysterious lights in the sky .
The first-person narrator is stuck in a hospital recovering from eye surgery with patches over his eyes and feels frustrated at being left out.A few days later it turns out that everyone who saw the lights has gone blind , leaving the narrator one of the few people in the world who can still see.The story suggests but never says that it is some space-based weapons system that was accidentally deployed.So , when viewing mysterious and spectacular unexplained lighting phenomena in the sky , perhaps it would be prudent to keep one eye closed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those who remember the very good John Wyndham novel "The Day of the Triffids" (later made into a very bad movie) will recall that the population of most of the civilized world is transfixed by a spectacular show of mysterious lights in the sky.
The first-person narrator is stuck in a hospital recovering from eye surgery with patches over his eyes and feels frustrated at being left out.A few days later it turns out that everyone who saw the lights has gone blind, leaving the narrator one of the few people in the world who can still see.The story suggests but never says that it is some space-based weapons system that was accidentally deployed.So, when viewing mysterious and spectacular unexplained lighting phenomena in the sky, perhaps it would be prudent to keep one eye closed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30388004</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>guruevi</author>
	<datestamp>1260460260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is said that the comet always precedes them - these world enders. The Coalsack planets are gone. Eight million settlers missing. The entire Aquilan system is gone too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is said that the comet always precedes them - these world enders .
The Coalsack planets are gone .
Eight million settlers missing .
The entire Aquilan system is gone too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is said that the comet always precedes them - these world enders.
The Coalsack planets are gone.
Eight million settlers missing.
The entire Aquilan system is gone too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383168</id>
	<title>I saw things very similar to these</title>
	<author>21mhz</author>
	<datestamp>1259586780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... about 20 years ago, over Syktyvkar, Russia.<br>That was clearly a rocket (I saw rocket launches before, living downrange of Plesetsk), but at some point the thing has "stopped" in the sky and started rolling out a spiral. The rotating object and the spiral quickly faded away, but the gaseous afterglow along the ascent trajectory remained, as it usually does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... about 20 years ago , over Syktyvkar , Russia.That was clearly a rocket ( I saw rocket launches before , living downrange of Plesetsk ) , but at some point the thing has " stopped " in the sky and started rolling out a spiral .
The rotating object and the spiral quickly faded away , but the gaseous afterglow along the ascent trajectory remained , as it usually does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... about 20 years ago, over Syktyvkar, Russia.That was clearly a rocket (I saw rocket launches before, living downrange of Plesetsk), but at some point the thing has "stopped" in the sky and started rolling out a spiral.
The rotating object and the spiral quickly faded away, but the gaseous afterglow along the ascent trajectory remained, as it usually does.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380662</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, come on...</title>
	<author>0racle</author>
	<datestamp>1259574540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That weak ass story is the best you can come up with?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That weak ass story is the best you can come up with ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That weak ass story is the best you can come up with?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381452</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>SeeSp0tRun</author>
	<datestamp>1259577960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A UFO, or unidentified flying object, can originate anywhere.  It just must conform to the following: <br>
Unidentified: unknown origin
<br>
Flying: not in/on the water/land
<br>
Object: another word for noun
<br>
To recap, it could be something that is in the air, and you have no idea wtf it is.  It may have come from the Earth, Mars, or the Russians.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A UFO , or unidentified flying object , can originate anywhere .
It just must conform to the following : Unidentified : unknown origin Flying : not in/on the water/land Object : another word for noun To recap , it could be something that is in the air , and you have no idea wtf it is .
It may have come from the Earth , Mars , or the Russians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A UFO, or unidentified flying object, can originate anywhere.
It just must conform to the following: 
Unidentified: unknown origin

Flying: not in/on the water/land

Object: another word for noun

To recap, it could be something that is in the air, and you have no idea wtf it is.
It may have come from the Earth, Mars, or the Russians.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382750</id>
	<title>I blame the Techno Viking</title>
	<author>nalidog</author>
	<datestamp>1259584440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No need to be alarmed. It's just the "Bat Signal" for Techno Viking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No need to be alarmed .
It 's just the " Bat Signal " for Techno Viking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No need to be alarmed.
It's just the "Bat Signal" for Techno Viking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380708</id>
	<title>The Obvious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't believe no one has said the obvious<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... it's very clear that someone has finally turned the Bat Signal into a functioning worm hole.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe no one has said the obvious ... it 's very clear that someone has finally turned the Bat Signal into a functioning worm hole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe no one has said the obvious ... it's very clear that someone has finally turned the Bat Signal into a functioning worm hole.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382090</id>
	<title>Shameful waste of a swirly thing ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1259580960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.. when there are no crops to flatten out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. when there are no crops to flatten out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. when there are no crops to flatten out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380378</id>
	<title>LCD Projector FTW</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259573160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember a light display for a "grand opening" of a restaurant here. They used huge floodlights to "beam" an image on to the clouds above (originally intended for a large white screen in the parking lot).<br>While those images were stagnant, I see no reason why the phenomenon couldn't be repeated 10+ years later with a more advanced tool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember a light display for a " grand opening " of a restaurant here .
They used huge floodlights to " beam " an image on to the clouds above ( originally intended for a large white screen in the parking lot ) .While those images were stagnant , I see no reason why the phenomenon could n't be repeated 10 + years later with a more advanced tool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember a light display for a "grand opening" of a restaurant here.
They used huge floodlights to "beam" an image on to the clouds above (originally intended for a large white screen in the parking lot).While those images were stagnant, I see no reason why the phenomenon couldn't be repeated 10+ years later with a more advanced tool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382204</id>
	<title>duH! It's obviously</title>
	<author>KiwiCanuck</author>
	<datestamp>1259581440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>a dimensional portal. Don't you watch scifi?</htmltext>
<tokenext>a dimensional portal .
Do n't you watch scifi ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a dimensional portal.
Don't you watch scifi?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382386</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>NCG\_Mike</author>
	<datestamp>1259582340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just in time for the solstice too. Coincidence... I think not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just in time for the solstice too .
Coincidence... I think not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just in time for the solstice too.
Coincidence... I think not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381302</id>
	<title>Re:Swirly Thing Alert!</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1259577360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And Kiff, issue a flashing light thingie!
</p><p> <i>Uhh...a red alert, sir?</i> </p><p>No time for details man, just do it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And Kiff , issue a flashing light thingie !
Uhh...a red alert , sir ?
No time for details man , just do it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And Kiff, issue a flashing light thingie!
Uhh...a red alert, sir?
No time for details man, just do it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30396940</id>
	<title>Re:Swirly Thing Alert!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260451380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like Van Gogh's Starry Night to me. Maybe he got the idea from a Russin Rocket.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like Van Gogh 's Starry Night to me .
Maybe he got the idea from a Russin Rocket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like Van Gogh's Starry Night to me.
Maybe he got the idea from a Russin Rocket.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382680</id>
	<title>Re:Where is my kaboom?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259584020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No boom today, boom tomorrow, there's always a boom tomorrow</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No boom today , boom tomorrow , there 's always a boom tomorrow</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No boom today, boom tomorrow, there's always a boom tomorrow</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386876</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>your\_neighbor</author>
	<datestamp>1260451740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Odin got a copy of Black&amp;White</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Odin got a copy of Black&amp;White</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Odin got a copy of Black&amp;White</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380864</id>
	<title>Check the garden for triffids ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259575500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Enough said.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Enough said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enough said.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381168</id>
	<title>Re:Swirly Thing Alert!</title>
	<author>MickyTheIdiot</author>
	<datestamp>1259576760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kryten: "Are you sure, Sir? It does mean changing the bulb."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kryten : " Are you sure , Sir ?
It does mean changing the bulb .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kryten: "Are you sure, Sir?
It does mean changing the bulb.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440</id>
	<title>Swirly Thing Alert!</title>
	<author>Tofino</author>
	<datestamp>1259573460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>All hands on deck: Swirly thing alert!</htmltext>
<tokenext>All hands on deck : Swirly thing alert !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All hands on deck: Swirly thing alert!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384410</id>
	<title>OMG! A Wormhole! ;-)</title>
	<author>Knoman</author>
	<datestamp>1259596380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>John Crichton COME HOME!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>John Crichton COME HOME ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>John Crichton COME HOME!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381322</id>
	<title>Re:Relax people</title>
	<author>Ragzouken</author>
	<datestamp>1259577420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No other object has been misidentified as a flying saucer more often than the planet Venus.</p><p>Even the former leader of your United States of America, James Earl Carter Jr., thought he saw a UFO once, but it's been proven he only saw the planet Venus.</p><p>Venus was at its peak brilliance last night. You probably thought you saw something up in the sky other than Venus, but I assure you, it was Venus.</p><p>Your scientists have yet to discover how neural networks create self-consciousness, let alone how the human brain processes two-dimensional retinal images into the three-dimensional phenomenon known as perception. Yet you somehow brazenly declare seeing is believing?</p><p>Your scientific illiteracy makes me shudder, and I wouldn't flaunt your ignorance by telling anyone that you saw anything last night other than the planet Venus, because if you do, you're a dead man.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No other object has been misidentified as a flying saucer more often than the planet Venus.Even the former leader of your United States of America , James Earl Carter Jr. , thought he saw a UFO once , but it 's been proven he only saw the planet Venus.Venus was at its peak brilliance last night .
You probably thought you saw something up in the sky other than Venus , but I assure you , it was Venus.Your scientists have yet to discover how neural networks create self-consciousness , let alone how the human brain processes two-dimensional retinal images into the three-dimensional phenomenon known as perception .
Yet you somehow brazenly declare seeing is believing ? Your scientific illiteracy makes me shudder , and I would n't flaunt your ignorance by telling anyone that you saw anything last night other than the planet Venus , because if you do , you 're a dead man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No other object has been misidentified as a flying saucer more often than the planet Venus.Even the former leader of your United States of America, James Earl Carter Jr., thought he saw a UFO once, but it's been proven he only saw the planet Venus.Venus was at its peak brilliance last night.
You probably thought you saw something up in the sky other than Venus, but I assure you, it was Venus.Your scientists have yet to discover how neural networks create self-consciousness, let alone how the human brain processes two-dimensional retinal images into the three-dimensional phenomenon known as perception.
Yet you somehow brazenly declare seeing is believing?Your scientific illiteracy makes me shudder, and I wouldn't flaunt your ignorance by telling anyone that you saw anything last night other than the planet Venus, because if you do, you're a dead man.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380446</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380738</id>
	<title>Let's see</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unidentified? Check<br>Flying? Check<br>Object? Check</p><p>It's a UFO alright. Of course after it's identified, it will no longer be a UFO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unidentified ?
CheckFlying ? CheckObject ?
CheckIt 's a UFO alright .
Of course after it 's identified , it will no longer be a UFO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unidentified?
CheckFlying? CheckObject?
CheckIt's a UFO alright.
Of course after it's identified, it will no longer be a UFO.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381256</id>
	<title>Clearly, it's the Higgs</title>
	<author>Bill Dimm</author>
	<datestamp>1259577120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is just a stunt being pulled by the Higgs Boson to distract us away from the LHC, <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/13/1826206/The-LHC-the-Higgs-Boson-and-Fate" title="slashdot.org">so we won't find it</a> [slashdot.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is just a stunt being pulled by the Higgs Boson to distract us away from the LHC , so we wo n't find it [ slashdot.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is just a stunt being pulled by the Higgs Boson to distract us away from the LHC, so we won't find it [slashdot.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382632</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1259583720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The spiral doesn't rotate.  It behaved exactly as you'd expect something being spewed out of a spinning source to behave.  Just like one of those spinning lawn sprinklers.  The blue "beam" is actually a smaller diameter spiral, which is also consistent with a spinning source venting something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The spiral does n't rotate .
It behaved exactly as you 'd expect something being spewed out of a spinning source to behave .
Just like one of those spinning lawn sprinklers .
The blue " beam " is actually a smaller diameter spiral , which is also consistent with a spinning source venting something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The spiral doesn't rotate.
It behaved exactly as you'd expect something being spewed out of a spinning source to behave.
Just like one of those spinning lawn sprinklers.
The blue "beam" is actually a smaller diameter spiral, which is also consistent with a spinning source venting something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386024</id>
	<title>Putin call home...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260440280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Politicians. So they finally decided to return where they came from</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Politicians .
So they finally decided to return where they came from</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Politicians.
So they finally decided to return where they came from</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380470</id>
	<title>Well....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259573580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>...I for one...<br>Welcome our now very dizzy alien overlords...</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>...I for one...Welcome our now very dizzy alien overlords.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I for one...Welcome our now very dizzy alien overlords...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383816</id>
	<title>Refraction</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259590920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The helical part was likely the rocket vapor trail.  The giant spiral part could have been sun light refracting through rocket vapor trail and illuminating an ice crystal layer in the atomosphere or something like that.   Anyone know what direction the sun was in?   From where the rocket was launched?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The helical part was likely the rocket vapor trail .
The giant spiral part could have been sun light refracting through rocket vapor trail and illuminating an ice crystal layer in the atomosphere or something like that .
Anyone know what direction the sun was in ?
From where the rocket was launched ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The helical part was likely the rocket vapor trail.
The giant spiral part could have been sun light refracting through rocket vapor trail and illuminating an ice crystal layer in the atomosphere or something like that.
Anyone know what direction the sun was in?
From where the rocket was launched?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383274</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259587380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Celebrity astronomer Knut J&#248;rgen R&#248;ed &#216;degaard</p></div><p>Wait.. He's a what?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Celebrity astronomer Knut J   rgen R   ed   degaardWait.. He 's a what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Celebrity astronomer Knut Jørgen Røed ØdegaardWait.. He's a what?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384276</id>
	<title>Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket!</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1259595060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if you're leading a government in south Asia bent on destroying another government in south Asia?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if you 're leading a government in south Asia bent on destroying another government in south Asia ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if you're leading a government in south Asia bent on destroying another government in south Asia?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30385662</id>
	<title>Day of the triffids</title>
	<author>adityamalik</author>
	<datestamp>1260477600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In an unrelated development, mysterious walking trees were found wandering the norwegian woods.
<br>
Experts predict they are an evolutionary response by the earth to substitute petroleum, just in time for copenhagen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In an unrelated development , mysterious walking trees were found wandering the norwegian woods .
Experts predict they are an evolutionary response by the earth to substitute petroleum , just in time for copenhagen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In an unrelated development, mysterious walking trees were found wandering the norwegian woods.
Experts predict they are an evolutionary response by the earth to substitute petroleum, just in time for copenhagen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380494</id>
	<title>WoW's new raid instance...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259573700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally, we've found the entrance...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , we 've found the entrance.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, we've found the entrance...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380630</id>
	<title>The ol "half trick" trick</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1259574420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suspect people are mixing in Photoshopped hoaxes with real photos and/or real eye-witness accounts. The first thing do for an investigation is to verify which photos are real and which are bogus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect people are mixing in Photoshopped hoaxes with real photos and/or real eye-witness accounts .
The first thing do for an investigation is to verify which photos are real and which are bogus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect people are mixing in Photoshopped hoaxes with real photos and/or real eye-witness accounts.
The first thing do for an investigation is to verify which photos are real and which are bogus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382944</id>
	<title>Re:WoW's new raid instance...</title>
	<author>NIN1385</author>
	<datestamp>1259585580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That was great, I laughed for 10 minutes about that one. gj</htmltext>
<tokenext>That was great , I laughed for 10 minutes about that one .
gj</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was great, I laughed for 10 minutes about that one.
gj</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30391734</id>
	<title>Hypnotic</title>
	<author>cheezitmike</author>
	<datestamp>1260473460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or, maybe someone was trying to hypnotize Norway...

<a href="http://www.reallifecomics.com/archive/091210.html" title="reallifecomics.com">http://www.reallifecomics.com/archive/091210.html</a> [reallifecomics.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...or failed trying to blow it up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , maybe someone was trying to hypnotize Norway.. . http : //www.reallifecomics.com/archive/091210.html [ reallifecomics.com ] ...or failed trying to blow it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, maybe someone was trying to hypnotize Norway...

http://www.reallifecomics.com/archive/091210.html [reallifecomics.com] ...or failed trying to blow it up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380992</id>
	<title>Hadron Colliders first black hole?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259576040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe, just maybe, those paranoid freaks that said black holes from the Hadron Collider might be reality could be right and this is the result of their testing??? Makes you wonder unless some credible source can tell us what that phenomenon was.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe , just maybe , those paranoid freaks that said black holes from the Hadron Collider might be reality could be right and this is the result of their testing ? ? ?
Makes you wonder unless some credible source can tell us what that phenomenon was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe, just maybe, those paranoid freaks that said black holes from the Hadron Collider might be reality could be right and this is the result of their testing???
Makes you wonder unless some credible source can tell us what that phenomenon was.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381020</id>
	<title>looking close</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1259576160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looking close, you can see a dish shaped object flanked by two cigar shped ones.</p><p>In other news, there was reports of a strange russion looking for nulcear wessels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking close , you can see a dish shaped object flanked by two cigar shped ones.In other news , there was reports of a strange russion looking for nulcear wessels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking close, you can see a dish shaped object flanked by two cigar shped ones.In other news, there was reports of a strange russion looking for nulcear wessels.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382666</id>
	<title>Re:Other explanations</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1259583900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Take a look at the video, or even the pictures.  The blue "beam" is just a smaller diameter spiral.  Definitely not a laser beam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Take a look at the video , or even the pictures .
The blue " beam " is just a smaller diameter spiral .
Definitely not a laser beam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take a look at the video, or even the pictures.
The blue "beam" is just a smaller diameter spiral.
Definitely not a laser beam.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30387346</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>Hadlock</author>
	<datestamp>1260456120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So basically the story is the Russians were testing a missile designed to hit multiple targets on the eastern seaboard of the US with nuclear warheads (google MIRV), withstand being hit (indirectly) by an atomic bomb while in flight, and penetrate missile bunkers. Launched from northern Norway, days before Obama is scheduled to recieve the Nobel peace prize, also in Norway. The US has been reulctant to pull out of Poland as part of our Missile Defense Shield (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US\_missile\_defense\_complex\_in\_Poland) but did so recently. If this was an intentional failure by Russia, it's an odd way of showing affection. Either way the timing couldn't possibly be worse on the Russian's part. Putin was probably throwing chairs Balmer style as soon as he got wind of this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So basically the story is the Russians were testing a missile designed to hit multiple targets on the eastern seaboard of the US with nuclear warheads ( google MIRV ) , withstand being hit ( indirectly ) by an atomic bomb while in flight , and penetrate missile bunkers .
Launched from northern Norway , days before Obama is scheduled to recieve the Nobel peace prize , also in Norway .
The US has been reulctant to pull out of Poland as part of our Missile Defense Shield ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US \ _missile \ _defense \ _complex \ _in \ _Poland ) but did so recently .
If this was an intentional failure by Russia , it 's an odd way of showing affection .
Either way the timing could n't possibly be worse on the Russian 's part .
Putin was probably throwing chairs Balmer style as soon as he got wind of this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So basically the story is the Russians were testing a missile designed to hit multiple targets on the eastern seaboard of the US with nuclear warheads (google MIRV), withstand being hit (indirectly) by an atomic bomb while in flight, and penetrate missile bunkers.
Launched from northern Norway, days before Obama is scheduled to recieve the Nobel peace prize, also in Norway.
The US has been reulctant to pull out of Poland as part of our Missile Defense Shield (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US\_missile\_defense\_complex\_in\_Poland) but did so recently.
If this was an intentional failure by Russia, it's an odd way of showing affection.
Either way the timing couldn't possibly be worse on the Russian's part.
Putin was probably throwing chairs Balmer style as soon as he got wind of this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380518</id>
	<title>So weird.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259573820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Definitely the weirdest damn thing I've ever seen. Maybe I just haven't spent enough time around rockets...could that really be cause by one? The spiral looks too perfect for an out of control rocket.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Definitely the weirdest damn thing I 've ever seen .
Maybe I just have n't spent enough time around rockets...could that really be cause by one ?
The spiral looks too perfect for an out of control rocket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Definitely the weirdest damn thing I've ever seen.
Maybe I just haven't spent enough time around rockets...could that really be cause by one?
The spiral looks too perfect for an out of control rocket.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381182</id>
	<title>Russian rocket</title>
	<author>MortenMW</author>
	<datestamp>1259576760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Russian rocket fired from a submarine. The russians of course denies this because the rocked failed. Case closed, next!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Russian rocket fired from a submarine .
The russians of course denies this because the rocked failed .
Case closed , next !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Russian rocket fired from a submarine.
The russians of course denies this because the rocked failed.
Case closed, next!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380504</id>
	<title>coral cache</title>
	<author>sl4shd0rk</author>
	<datestamp>1259573760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk.nyud.net/news/worldnews/article-1234430/Mystery-spiral-blue-light-display-hovers-Norway.html" title="nyud.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk.nyud.net/news/worldnews/article-1234430/Mystery-spiral-blue-light-display-hovers-Norway.html</a> [nyud.net]</p><p><a href="http://i.dailymail.co.uk.nyud.net/i/pix/2009/12/09/article-1234430-07887B10000005DC-48\_634x421.jpg" title="nyud.net" rel="nofollow">http://i.dailymail.co.uk.nyud.net/i/pix/2009/12/09/article-1234430-07887B10000005DC-48\_634x421.jpg</a> [nyud.net]<br><a href="http://i.dailymail.co.uk.nyud.net/i/pix/2009/12/09/article-1234430-0787DEA4000005DC-908\_634x348.jpg" title="nyud.net" rel="nofollow">http://i.dailymail.co.uk.nyud.net/i/pix/2009/12/09/article-1234430-0787DEA4000005DC-908\_634x348.jpg</a> [nyud.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.dailymail.co.uk.nyud.net/news/worldnews/article-1234430/Mystery-spiral-blue-light-display-hovers-Norway.html [ nyud.net ] http : //i.dailymail.co.uk.nyud.net/i/pix/2009/12/09/article-1234430-07887B10000005DC-48 \ _634x421.jpg [ nyud.net ] http : //i.dailymail.co.uk.nyud.net/i/pix/2009/12/09/article-1234430-0787DEA4000005DC-908 \ _634x348.jpg [ nyud.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.dailymail.co.uk.nyud.net/news/worldnews/article-1234430/Mystery-spiral-blue-light-display-hovers-Norway.html [nyud.net]http://i.dailymail.co.uk.nyud.net/i/pix/2009/12/09/article-1234430-07887B10000005DC-48\_634x421.jpg [nyud.net]http://i.dailymail.co.uk.nyud.net/i/pix/2009/12/09/article-1234430-0787DEA4000005DC-908\_634x348.jpg [nyud.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380820</id>
	<title>Re:Relax people</title>
	<author>Sponge Bath</author>
	<datestamp>1259575320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>"Its simply the aurora borealis..."</i></p><p>[Carla says to Cliff]: You're a roaring borealis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Its simply the aurora borealis... " [ Carla says to Cliff ] : You 're a roaring borealis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "Its simply the aurora borealis..."[Carla says to Cliff]: You're a roaring borealis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380446</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380856</id>
	<title>Re:Well....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259575440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, it is just the messiah...</p><p>And odin, loki and nazi of course...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , it is just the messiah...And odin , loki and nazi of course.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, it is just the messiah...And odin, loki and nazi of course...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380446</id>
	<title>Relax people</title>
	<author>Daimanta</author>
	<datestamp>1259573460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its simply the aurora borealis caused by some escaped gasses from the planet Venus.</p><p>Now go back to sleep.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its simply the aurora borealis caused by some escaped gasses from the planet Venus.Now go back to sleep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its simply the aurora borealis caused by some escaped gasses from the planet Venus.Now go back to sleep.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432</id>
	<title>no ufos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259573400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>...although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yet.</i> <br>
<br>
The reason nobody's mentioned UFOs yet is because whatever it was originated from the Earth. Unless I'm seriously mistaken, UFOs tend to come from space, not the ground.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yet .
The reason nobody 's mentioned UFOs yet is because whatever it was originated from the Earth .
Unless I 'm seriously mistaken , UFOs tend to come from space , not the ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yet.
The reason nobody's mentioned UFOs yet is because whatever it was originated from the Earth.
Unless I'm seriously mistaken, UFOs tend to come from space, not the ground.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383928</id>
	<title>Re:Please "dumb it down"</title>
	<author>adamrut</author>
	<datestamp>1259591820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I know now that "parsimonious" is actually a word. I've learned enough for today... I'll move on to the next article now.</p></div><p>Well I looked up "parsimonious" in the dictionary and I think I understand what it means, but in that sentence it has me stumped. Are they saying that they think the explanation is bullsh*t?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know now that " parsimonious " is actually a word .
I 've learned enough for today... I 'll move on to the next article now.Well I looked up " parsimonious " in the dictionary and I think I understand what it means , but in that sentence it has me stumped .
Are they saying that they think the explanation is bullsh * t ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know now that "parsimonious" is actually a word.
I've learned enough for today... I'll move on to the next article now.Well I looked up "parsimonious" in the dictionary and I think I understand what it means, but in that sentence it has me stumped.
Are they saying that they think the explanation is bullsh*t?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382696</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>Pictish Prince</author>
	<datestamp>1259584080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it really <i>was</i> the LHC, I'd say the damn thing is worth the money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it really was the LHC , I 'd say the damn thing is worth the money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it really was the LHC, I'd say the damn thing is worth the money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30385256</id>
	<title>FPS?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259606220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like a rail gun corkscrew trail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like a rail gun corkscrew trail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like a rail gun corkscrew trail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386790</id>
	<title>Re:Swirly Thing Alert!</title>
	<author>Sumbius</author>
	<datestamp>1260450840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cat: Forget Red &mdash; let's go all the way up to Brown Alert!
Kryten: There's no such thing as a Brown Alert, sir.
Cat: You won't be saying that in a minute! And don't say I didn't alert you!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cat : Forget Red    let 's go all the way up to Brown Alert !
Kryten : There 's no such thing as a Brown Alert , sir .
Cat : You wo n't be saying that in a minute !
And do n't say I did n't alert you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cat: Forget Red — let's go all the way up to Brown Alert!
Kryten: There's no such thing as a Brown Alert, sir.
Cat: You won't be saying that in a minute!
And don't say I didn't alert you!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380510</id>
	<title>Aliens....?</title>
	<author>ikefox</author>
	<datestamp>1259573820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>These images are bizarre. In some of them, the light seems to be coming over the mountains in the background, almost as if it were being projected from on the ground. But this doesn't make sense, as a projected image would not ordinarily coalesce in one place in the sky, as it appears to have done. The Archimedean spiral formation that appeared seems too perfect to be the result of a weather formation. This does not look like any aurora that meteorologists have documented, so far as I'm aware. However, nature always has surprises for us uncomprehending humans. The stipulation that it was a rocket that had gone out of control also seems unlikely. Again, the image seems too perfect.

I'm honestly stumped, but too skeptical to want to believe that this is alien contact.</htmltext>
<tokenext>These images are bizarre .
In some of them , the light seems to be coming over the mountains in the background , almost as if it were being projected from on the ground .
But this does n't make sense , as a projected image would not ordinarily coalesce in one place in the sky , as it appears to have done .
The Archimedean spiral formation that appeared seems too perfect to be the result of a weather formation .
This does not look like any aurora that meteorologists have documented , so far as I 'm aware .
However , nature always has surprises for us uncomprehending humans .
The stipulation that it was a rocket that had gone out of control also seems unlikely .
Again , the image seems too perfect .
I 'm honestly stumped , but too skeptical to want to believe that this is alien contact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These images are bizarre.
In some of them, the light seems to be coming over the mountains in the background, almost as if it were being projected from on the ground.
But this doesn't make sense, as a projected image would not ordinarily coalesce in one place in the sky, as it appears to have done.
The Archimedean spiral formation that appeared seems too perfect to be the result of a weather formation.
This does not look like any aurora that meteorologists have documented, so far as I'm aware.
However, nature always has surprises for us uncomprehending humans.
The stipulation that it was a rocket that had gone out of control also seems unlikely.
Again, the image seems too perfect.
I'm honestly stumped, but too skeptical to want to believe that this is alien contact.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383752</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>StreetStealth</author>
	<datestamp>1259590500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was attacked by a UFO once.</p><p>Then I identified the flying object. It was a stuffed animal thrown by my brother.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was attacked by a UFO once.Then I identified the flying object .
It was a stuffed animal thrown by my brother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was attacked by a UFO once.Then I identified the flying object.
It was a stuffed animal thrown by my brother.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380638</id>
	<title>HIlary Clinton Was Correct</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>North Korea is attacking Hawaii via Norway !</p><p>Yours In Yasnogorsk,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>North Korea is attacking Hawaii via Norway ! Yours In Yasnogorsk,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>North Korea is attacking Hawaii via Norway !Yours In Yasnogorsk,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384166</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>meowhous</author>
	<datestamp>1259594040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>They were certainly mentioned very early on in the comment stream, but most of those early ones seem to have been moderated into invisibility.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They were certainly mentioned very early on in the comment stream , but most of those early ones seem to have been moderated into invisibility .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They were certainly mentioned very early on in the comment stream, but most of those early ones seem to have been moderated into invisibility.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380612</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, come on...</title>
	<author>scubamage</author>
	<datestamp>1259574300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kay, how many times have you flashy-thinged me??</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kay , how many times have you flashy-thinged me ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kay, how many times have you flashy-thinged me?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382316</id>
	<title>This is why UFO observations are always so suspect</title>
	<author>PaganRitual</author>
	<datestamp>1259582040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You haven't got any mod points so no one will read yours or my post, but this is, in hindsight, a perfect example of why UFO related observations get such an incredibly bad rap. I'm not attacking you personally per se, but yours is a near perfect example.</p><p>With obviously no knowledge of rocketry at all you're happy to put forward that</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The stipulation that it was a rocket that had gone out of control also seems unlikely.</p></div><p>yet now that it's all been and gone this is <i>exactly</i> what it actually was. And this is why that lone observations from people that have seen 'something' carry virtually no weight. Without, or even with, experience in all relevant airborne related fields it's near impossible to be sure that what the majority of people have seen is anything other than the mundane that appears incredible to the untrained eye. Sufficently indistinguishable from magic, if you will.</p><p>And you weren't even there. Get a report from someone at the scene and you're suddenly including in hysteria, panic, adrenaline, and a whole other list of things that someone seeing something unfamilar will have affect their judgement. Put on top of all that a bias towards assigning anything unknown to an alien race and right there you have the perfect receipe for a completely mis-identified flying object.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have n't got any mod points so no one will read yours or my post , but this is , in hindsight , a perfect example of why UFO related observations get such an incredibly bad rap .
I 'm not attacking you personally per se , but yours is a near perfect example.With obviously no knowledge of rocketry at all you 're happy to put forward thatThe stipulation that it was a rocket that had gone out of control also seems unlikely.yet now that it 's all been and gone this is exactly what it actually was .
And this is why that lone observations from people that have seen 'something ' carry virtually no weight .
Without , or even with , experience in all relevant airborne related fields it 's near impossible to be sure that what the majority of people have seen is anything other than the mundane that appears incredible to the untrained eye .
Sufficently indistinguishable from magic , if you will.And you were n't even there .
Get a report from someone at the scene and you 're suddenly including in hysteria , panic , adrenaline , and a whole other list of things that someone seeing something unfamilar will have affect their judgement .
Put on top of all that a bias towards assigning anything unknown to an alien race and right there you have the perfect receipe for a completely mis-identified flying object .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You haven't got any mod points so no one will read yours or my post, but this is, in hindsight, a perfect example of why UFO related observations get such an incredibly bad rap.
I'm not attacking you personally per se, but yours is a near perfect example.With obviously no knowledge of rocketry at all you're happy to put forward thatThe stipulation that it was a rocket that had gone out of control also seems unlikely.yet now that it's all been and gone this is exactly what it actually was.
And this is why that lone observations from people that have seen 'something' carry virtually no weight.
Without, or even with, experience in all relevant airborne related fields it's near impossible to be sure that what the majority of people have seen is anything other than the mundane that appears incredible to the untrained eye.
Sufficently indistinguishable from magic, if you will.And you weren't even there.
Get a report from someone at the scene and you're suddenly including in hysteria, panic, adrenaline, and a whole other list of things that someone seeing something unfamilar will have affect their judgement.
Put on top of all that a bias towards assigning anything unknown to an alien race and right there you have the perfect receipe for a completely mis-identified flying object.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382532</id>
	<title>Mother Plucker</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259583120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chicken Little was right!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chicken Little was right !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chicken Little was right!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383174</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>burne</author>
	<datestamp>1259586780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nobody mentioned UFO's because a gobo with exactly the same image is available in Rosco's online shop. Find it yourself at <a href="http://www.rosco.com/us/gobos/index.cfm" title="rosco.com">http://www.rosco.com/us/gobos/index.cfm</a> [rosco.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody mentioned UFO 's because a gobo with exactly the same image is available in Rosco 's online shop .
Find it yourself at http : //www.rosco.com/us/gobos/index.cfm [ rosco.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody mentioned UFO's because a gobo with exactly the same image is available in Rosco's online shop.
Find it yourself at http://www.rosco.com/us/gobos/index.cfm [rosco.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380804</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>Travis Mansbridge</author>
	<datestamp>1259575260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>U.F.O. stands for Unidentified Flying Object. Those are the only conditions for being a U.F.O.</htmltext>
<tokenext>U.F.O .
stands for Unidentified Flying Object .
Those are the only conditions for being a U.F.O .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>U.F.O.
stands for Unidentified Flying Object.
Those are the only conditions for being a U.F.O.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382460</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>ChienAndalu</author>
	<datestamp>1259582700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have a look at <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx8i5EfmYU4" title="youtube.com">this video explanation</a> [youtube.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have a look at this video explanation [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have a look at this video explanation [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382552</id>
	<title>Just a spaceship carrying some damn alien baby...</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1259583240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One more dang illegal. Spewing green glowing stuff everywhere. Those dang Kryptonian rockets. They're *so* messy.  Well, there goes the neighborhood....</p><p>Excuse me, I must go back to my secret lair now and shine my hairless head.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One more dang illegal .
Spewing green glowing stuff everywhere .
Those dang Kryptonian rockets .
They 're * so * messy .
Well , there goes the neighborhood....Excuse me , I must go back to my secret lair now and shine my hairless head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One more dang illegal.
Spewing green glowing stuff everywhere.
Those dang Kryptonian rockets.
They're *so* messy.
Well, there goes the neighborhood....Excuse me, I must go back to my secret lair now and shine my hairless head.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30385400</id>
	<title>It was a fucking strategic weapon being tested!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259608920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After reviewing the wikipedia page I would say this is a bit scary.  It was a state of the art submarine launched ICBM, capable of holding 4 - 10 MIRVs (warheads).   The Russian doctrine is to hide their subs rather than park them off the coast of the target, but SLBM missiles can have a very short flight time relative to land based missiles.  It appears Russia has not yet tested or deployed the submarine that can launch this missile.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After reviewing the wikipedia page I would say this is a bit scary .
It was a state of the art submarine launched ICBM , capable of holding 4 - 10 MIRVs ( warheads ) .
The Russian doctrine is to hide their subs rather than park them off the coast of the target , but SLBM missiles can have a very short flight time relative to land based missiles .
It appears Russia has not yet tested or deployed the submarine that can launch this missile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After reviewing the wikipedia page I would say this is a bit scary.
It was a state of the art submarine launched ICBM, capable of holding 4 - 10 MIRVs (warheads).
The Russian doctrine is to hide their subs rather than park them off the coast of the target, but SLBM missiles can have a very short flight time relative to land based missiles.
It appears Russia has not yet tested or deployed the submarine that can launch this missile.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380792</id>
	<title>Re:Well....</title>
	<author>nschubach</author>
	<datestamp>1259575140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I personally enjoyed your particular <i>twist</i> to that meme.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I personally enjoyed your particular twist to that meme .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I personally enjoyed your particular twist to that meme.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381828</id>
	<title>Re:Protons are launched out of Baikonur</title>
	<author>damburger</author>
	<datestamp>1259579640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Aside from the direction fail, I was going to point this out. Whoever suggested that needs to buy a globe, find Norway, and then find Kazakhstan. The 'Russian rocket' theory is very much plausible, but at least do some fucking background research. For gods sake, thinking a Proton might be launched from northern Russia is not even a wikipedia level of knowledge.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Aside from the direction fail , I was going to point this out .
Whoever suggested that needs to buy a globe , find Norway , and then find Kazakhstan .
The 'Russian rocket ' theory is very much plausible , but at least do some fucking background research .
For gods sake , thinking a Proton might be launched from northern Russia is not even a wikipedia level of knowledge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aside from the direction fail, I was going to point this out.
Whoever suggested that needs to buy a globe, find Norway, and then find Kazakhstan.
The 'Russian rocket' theory is very much plausible, but at least do some fucking background research.
For gods sake, thinking a Proton might be launched from northern Russia is not even a wikipedia level of knowledge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381424</id>
	<title>Failed ICBM test</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259577900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is failed Bulava(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56\_Bulava) ICBM test.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is failed Bulava ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56 \ _Bulava ) ICBM test .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is failed Bulava(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56\_Bulava) ICBM test.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383456</id>
	<title>Rocket gone wild.</title>
	<author>Neanderthal Ninny</author>
	<datestamp>1259588700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here is a well documented launch of an Minotaur rocket from Vandenberg AFB in 2005 which has some similarities:<br><a href="http://www.spacearchive.info/minotaur-streak.htm" title="spacearchive.info">http://www.spacearchive.info/minotaur-streak.htm</a> [spacearchive.info]<br>As for the spiral in I my opinion, depending on the perspective of the viewer relative to rocket you can see this pattern if you are looking at the exhaust end of the rocket and the rocket started to spin so that exhaust plume started to create a spiral. As the rocket lost total directional control, the rocket controller ordered a self-destruct so the sudden "hole" in the middle of the spiral as the rocket exhaust stops at the end of the event.<br>Here is another link about rocket trails with an expert description <a href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap020926.html" title="nasa.gov">http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap020926.html</a> [nasa.gov]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is a well documented launch of an Minotaur rocket from Vandenberg AFB in 2005 which has some similarities : http : //www.spacearchive.info/minotaur-streak.htm [ spacearchive.info ] As for the spiral in I my opinion , depending on the perspective of the viewer relative to rocket you can see this pattern if you are looking at the exhaust end of the rocket and the rocket started to spin so that exhaust plume started to create a spiral .
As the rocket lost total directional control , the rocket controller ordered a self-destruct so the sudden " hole " in the middle of the spiral as the rocket exhaust stops at the end of the event.Here is another link about rocket trails with an expert description http : //antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap020926.html [ nasa.gov ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is a well documented launch of an Minotaur rocket from Vandenberg AFB in 2005 which has some similarities:http://www.spacearchive.info/minotaur-streak.htm [spacearchive.info]As for the spiral in I my opinion, depending on the perspective of the viewer relative to rocket you can see this pattern if you are looking at the exhaust end of the rocket and the rocket started to spin so that exhaust plume started to create a spiral.
As the rocket lost total directional control, the rocket controller ordered a self-destruct so the sudden "hole" in the middle of the spiral as the rocket exhaust stops at the end of the event.Here is another link about rocket trails with an expert description http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap020926.html [nasa.gov]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381118</id>
	<title>Simple Explanation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259576580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing to worry about, this is a typical time-mass interfence pattern caused by a trans-galactic class rift engine reaching its firing potential while the host craft skims the atmosphere of a planet with its anti-graviton containment field slightly out of phase alignment.</p><p>Considering that Sol33087-3 (Earth) is also on the blue-list ('keep your distance') due to the operation of your Hadron collider (whose output can cause short-duration dimensional microfractures in rift engine stern waves), as regional observer I have reported the incident to the appropriate authorities together with readings from the unique anti-graviton signature of the engine and you can rest assured that the pilot/primary officer of the craft will be identified and interviewed, with appropriate action taken.</p><p>Erm - posting AC for obvious reasons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing to worry about , this is a typical time-mass interfence pattern caused by a trans-galactic class rift engine reaching its firing potential while the host craft skims the atmosphere of a planet with its anti-graviton containment field slightly out of phase alignment.Considering that Sol33087-3 ( Earth ) is also on the blue-list ( 'keep your distance ' ) due to the operation of your Hadron collider ( whose output can cause short-duration dimensional microfractures in rift engine stern waves ) , as regional observer I have reported the incident to the appropriate authorities together with readings from the unique anti-graviton signature of the engine and you can rest assured that the pilot/primary officer of the craft will be identified and interviewed , with appropriate action taken.Erm - posting AC for obvious reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing to worry about, this is a typical time-mass interfence pattern caused by a trans-galactic class rift engine reaching its firing potential while the host craft skims the atmosphere of a planet with its anti-graviton containment field slightly out of phase alignment.Considering that Sol33087-3 (Earth) is also on the blue-list ('keep your distance') due to the operation of your Hadron collider (whose output can cause short-duration dimensional microfractures in rift engine stern waves), as regional observer I have reported the incident to the appropriate authorities together with readings from the unique anti-graviton signature of the engine and you can rest assured that the pilot/primary officer of the craft will be identified and interviewed, with appropriate action taken.Erm - posting AC for obvious reasons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380400</id>
	<title>Did we</title>
	<author>haderytn</author>
	<datestamp>1259573280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>kill an alien?</htmltext>
<tokenext>kill an alien ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>kill an alien?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381918</id>
	<title>Re:Swirly Thing Alert!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259580120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally!  I was getting a headache from the Everything's Fine Klaxon.</p><p>- T</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally !
I was getting a headache from the Everything 's Fine Klaxon.- T</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally!
I was getting a headache from the Everything's Fine Klaxon.- T</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384660</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>Eli Gottlieb</author>
	<datestamp>1259598780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally, all you fake monotheists admit that you never really believed in God in the first place.  Return to the barbarism of your roots, that we may finally destroy you with all your idol-worship!</p><p>Am Yisrael chai!  Od avinu chai!  Mavet la'paganim!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , all you fake monotheists admit that you never really believed in God in the first place .
Return to the barbarism of your roots , that we may finally destroy you with all your idol-worship ! Am Yisrael chai !
Od avinu chai !
Mavet la'paganim !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, all you fake monotheists admit that you never really believed in God in the first place.
Return to the barbarism of your roots, that we may finally destroy you with all your idol-worship!Am Yisrael chai!
Od avinu chai!
Mavet la'paganim!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386442</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>bcmm</author>
	<datestamp>1260445620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The third picture on the second link clearly shows a vapour trail lit by the fading sunset. However I think physicists are going to have a hard time explaining a rotating spiral and a blue beam of light with ice crystals.</p></div></blockquote><p>Dawn, not sunset. And the spirals (the blue thing is also a bit spiraly) could be two different leaks (or a leak and the exhaust) from a rocket which is spinning due to some failure of its guidance systems.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The third picture on the second link clearly shows a vapour trail lit by the fading sunset .
However I think physicists are going to have a hard time explaining a rotating spiral and a blue beam of light with ice crystals.Dawn , not sunset .
And the spirals ( the blue thing is also a bit spiraly ) could be two different leaks ( or a leak and the exhaust ) from a rocket which is spinning due to some failure of its guidance systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The third picture on the second link clearly shows a vapour trail lit by the fading sunset.
However I think physicists are going to have a hard time explaining a rotating spiral and a blue beam of light with ice crystals.Dawn, not sunset.
And the spirals (the blue thing is also a bit spiraly) could be two different leaks (or a leak and the exhaust) from a rocket which is spinning due to some failure of its guidance systems.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381974</id>
	<title>Goatse?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259580360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Finally, we've found the entrance...</p></div></blockquote><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... to Uranus?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , we 've found the entrance... ... to Uranus ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, we've found the entrance... ... to Uranus?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380410</id>
	<title>Where is my kaboom?</title>
	<author>Tofino</author>
	<datestamp>1259573340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was supposed to be an earth-shattering kaboom!</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was supposed to be an earth-shattering kaboom !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was supposed to be an earth-shattering kaboom!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381444</id>
	<title>Energy required to create a worm hole</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259577960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>
I say the Large Hadron Collider at CERN never did it's claimed tests... the energy was diverted to Norway to make this worm hole!<p>
Now back to hiding under my tin foil hat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I say the Large Hadron Collider at CERN never did it 's claimed tests... the energy was diverted to Norway to make this worm hole !
Now back to hiding under my tin foil hat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I say the Large Hadron Collider at CERN never did it's claimed tests... the energy was diverted to Norway to make this worm hole!
Now back to hiding under my tin foil hat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380768</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259575080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>UFO's are unidentified.  Everything about a UFO is unknown.  Space is one, albeit very unlikely, UFO hypothesis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>UFO 's are unidentified .
Everything about a UFO is unknown .
Space is one , albeit very unlikely , UFO hypothesis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>UFO's are unidentified.
Everything about a UFO is unknown.
Space is one, albeit very unlikely, UFO hypothesis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381560</id>
	<title>Cern's fault.</title>
	<author>Rawrsterman</author>
	<datestamp>1259578380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like CERN's particle collider is creating a blackhole!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like CERN 's particle collider is creating a blackhole !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like CERN's particle collider is creating a blackhole!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381362</id>
	<title>UFO over Ontario</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259577600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah I saw a pulsating light in the sky over Northern Ontario last night at about 3 AM. At first I thought it was a star but when I looked around I could see the moon dimly shining through a full-sky cloud cover. I watched it for about 5 minutes before moving on. It was quite high but beneath the clouds: it never moved, but just slowly pulsated yellowish-red irregularly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah I saw a pulsating light in the sky over Northern Ontario last night at about 3 AM .
At first I thought it was a star but when I looked around I could see the moon dimly shining through a full-sky cloud cover .
I watched it for about 5 minutes before moving on .
It was quite high but beneath the clouds : it never moved , but just slowly pulsated yellowish-red irregularly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah I saw a pulsating light in the sky over Northern Ontario last night at about 3 AM.
At first I thought it was a star but when I looked around I could see the moon dimly shining through a full-sky cloud cover.
I watched it for about 5 minutes before moving on.
It was quite high but beneath the clouds: it never moved, but just slowly pulsated yellowish-red irregularly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381608</id>
	<title>Anyone notice...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259578560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article about the Russian Proton-M Carrier Rocket is from Dec 7th of....2005?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article about the Russian Proton-M Carrier Rocket is from Dec 7th of....2005 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article about the Russian Proton-M Carrier Rocket is from Dec 7th of....2005?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381506</id>
	<title>Re:Protons are launched out of Baikonur</title>
	<author>jpmorgan</author>
	<datestamp>1259578200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was most likely a test of Russia's new ICBM, designed to sneak past the US missile defense net. A failed test, that is. And they're not exactly going to admit that to the public.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was most likely a test of Russia 's new ICBM , designed to sneak past the US missile defense net .
A failed test , that is .
And they 're not exactly going to admit that to the public .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was most likely a test of Russia's new ICBM, designed to sneak past the US missile defense net.
A failed test, that is.
And they're not exactly going to admit that to the public.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380650</id>
	<title>Spiral warning</title>
	<author>hammarlund</author>
	<datestamp>1259574480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since it's sabotage of the CERN collider has not been especially effective in preventing the restart of the collider, I believe that these spirals are a warning from a future Higgs boson. I urge CERN to immediately halt all testing until we receive more information from H b.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since it 's sabotage of the CERN collider has not been especially effective in preventing the restart of the collider , I believe that these spirals are a warning from a future Higgs boson .
I urge CERN to immediately halt all testing until we receive more information from H b .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since it's sabotage of the CERN collider has not been especially effective in preventing the restart of the collider, I believe that these spirals are a warning from a future Higgs boson.
I urge CERN to immediately halt all testing until we receive more information from H b.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383560</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>turbidostato</author>
	<datestamp>1259589300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Unless I'm seriously mistaken, UFOs tend to come from space, not the ground."</p><p>You are both seriously mistaken and too young to know.  Back in the seventies (the big days of the UFO scene) we all "knew" that places like Canary Islands or the Bermuda Triangle were submarine secret UFO bases (well, not so secret since everybody knew about them).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Unless I 'm seriously mistaken , UFOs tend to come from space , not the ground .
" You are both seriously mistaken and too young to know .
Back in the seventies ( the big days of the UFO scene ) we all " knew " that places like Canary Islands or the Bermuda Triangle were submarine secret UFO bases ( well , not so secret since everybody knew about them ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Unless I'm seriously mistaken, UFOs tend to come from space, not the ground.
"You are both seriously mistaken and too young to know.
Back in the seventies (the big days of the UFO scene) we all "knew" that places like Canary Islands or the Bermuda Triangle were submarine secret UFO bases (well, not so secret since everybody knew about them).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381386</id>
	<title>Re:Swirly Thing Alert!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259577720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"You will be joining a society where you will be compelled to have sex with beautiful, brilliant women twice daily, on demand. Now, am I the only one here who finds that just a little bit tacky?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" You will be joining a society where you will be compelled to have sex with beautiful , brilliant women twice daily , on demand .
Now , am I the only one here who finds that just a little bit tacky ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You will be joining a society where you will be compelled to have sex with beautiful, brilliant women twice daily, on demand.
Now, am I the only one here who finds that just a little bit tacky?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382868</id>
	<title>Re:WoW's new raid instance...</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1259585040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I dunno how you are supposed to get there from your basement though<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/</htmltext>
<tokenext>I dunno how you are supposed to get there from your basement though : /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dunno how you are supposed to get there from your basement though :/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381408</id>
	<title>Blue-green beam</title>
	<author>goodmanj</author>
	<datestamp>1259577780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree, this looks like a rocket out of control, especially when you look at the videos.</p><p>But here's the one remaining question: what's the glowing blue-green "beam" shooting out from the center?  It's not the launch trajectory of the rocket, because according to this site (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1234430/Mystery-spiral-blue-light-display-hovers-Norway.html) the green beam formed *after* the spiral was visible.</p><p>My guess: the rocket fuel gradually became ionized, and the glowing charged ions moved away from the rocket following along magnetic field lines.</p><p>Anybody know what cardinal direction these photos are taken in?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , this looks like a rocket out of control , especially when you look at the videos.But here 's the one remaining question : what 's the glowing blue-green " beam " shooting out from the center ?
It 's not the launch trajectory of the rocket , because according to this site ( http : //www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1234430/Mystery-spiral-blue-light-display-hovers-Norway.html ) the green beam formed * after * the spiral was visible.My guess : the rocket fuel gradually became ionized , and the glowing charged ions moved away from the rocket following along magnetic field lines.Anybody know what cardinal direction these photos are taken in ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, this looks like a rocket out of control, especially when you look at the videos.But here's the one remaining question: what's the glowing blue-green "beam" shooting out from the center?
It's not the launch trajectory of the rocket, because according to this site (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1234430/Mystery-spiral-blue-light-display-hovers-Norway.html) the green beam formed *after* the spiral was visible.My guess: the rocket fuel gradually became ionized, and the glowing charged ions moved away from the rocket following along magnetic field lines.Anybody know what cardinal direction these photos are taken in?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384714</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>DavidTC</author>
	<datestamp>1259599380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, UFS have to be <b>flying</b> (It's in the name), which still leaves an open question of if this was a UFO.</p><p>
It looks like some sort of projected effect to me, hence not a UFO, although I'll be damned if I can figure out how you do that in the open sky like that.</p><p>
Everyone seems to be going with 'rocket', but that's one damn weird spinning rocket. Usually, they get blown up when they start going like that, and I've never heard of one that loops perfectly. (I mean, gravity should be making the loop an oval, even if the flight path is perfectly curved.)</p><p>
And that totally ignores the blue light in the middle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , UFS have to be flying ( It 's in the name ) , which still leaves an open question of if this was a UFO .
It looks like some sort of projected effect to me , hence not a UFO , although I 'll be damned if I can figure out how you do that in the open sky like that .
Everyone seems to be going with 'rocket ' , but that 's one damn weird spinning rocket .
Usually , they get blown up when they start going like that , and I 've never heard of one that loops perfectly .
( I mean , gravity should be making the loop an oval , even if the flight path is perfectly curved .
) And that totally ignores the blue light in the middle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, UFS have to be flying (It's in the name), which still leaves an open question of if this was a UFO.
It looks like some sort of projected effect to me, hence not a UFO, although I'll be damned if I can figure out how you do that in the open sky like that.
Everyone seems to be going with 'rocket', but that's one damn weird spinning rocket.
Usually, they get blown up when they start going like that, and I've never heard of one that loops perfectly.
(I mean, gravity should be making the loop an oval, even if the flight path is perfectly curved.
)
And that totally ignores the blue light in the middle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382854</id>
	<title>Clearly it was caused by...</title>
	<author>zkiwi34</author>
	<datestamp>1259585040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Either global warming, or one of the CRU unit paying the price in a flashy manner for their apparent misdeeds. Who knew...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Either global warming , or one of the CRU unit paying the price in a flashy manner for their apparent misdeeds .
Who knew.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Either global warming, or one of the CRU unit paying the price in a flashy manner for their apparent misdeeds.
Who knew...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384236</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1259594640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From article: A Moscow news outlet quoted the Russian Navy as denying any rocket launches from the White Sea area.
<br> <br>
Now can we get past all these boring Occam's razor mandated responses about it looking exactly like a rocket spiraling out of control and get back to the excitement of preparing for an alien invasion?</htmltext>
<tokenext>From article : A Moscow news outlet quoted the Russian Navy as denying any rocket launches from the White Sea area .
Now can we get past all these boring Occam 's razor mandated responses about it looking exactly like a rocket spiraling out of control and get back to the excitement of preparing for an alien invasion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From article: A Moscow news outlet quoted the Russian Navy as denying any rocket launches from the White Sea area.
Now can we get past all these boring Occam's razor mandated responses about it looking exactly like a rocket spiraling out of control and get back to the excitement of preparing for an alien invasion?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380750</id>
	<title>Even if it's just a rocket</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to say 'thanks for the light show'. That's the most unusual thing I've seen in the sky!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to say 'thanks for the light show' .
That 's the most unusual thing I 've seen in the sky !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to say 'thanks for the light show'.
That's the most unusual thing I've seen in the sky!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382110</id>
	<title>Re:Swirly Thing Alert!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259581020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>omg, a red dwarf reference</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>omg , a red dwarf reference</tokentext>
<sentencetext>omg, a red dwarf reference</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384872</id>
	<title>The Nowegian BatSignal.</title>
	<author>OgGreeb</author>
	<datestamp>1259601300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's villainy afoot!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's villainy afoot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's villainy afoot!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30390458</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260469200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasn't Obama in Norway at the time for the Nobel reception?</p><p>He was communicating with our Galactic Overlord.  There's more to believe in now than change, baby.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't Obama in Norway at the time for the Nobel reception ? He was communicating with our Galactic Overlord .
There 's more to believe in now than change , baby .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't Obama in Norway at the time for the Nobel reception?He was communicating with our Galactic Overlord.
There's more to believe in now than change, baby.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383322</id>
	<title>Re:Spinning beach ball of death</title>
	<author>CharlyFoxtrot</author>
	<datestamp>1259587800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks more like the "time machine" effect. Anyone notice something back that wasn't there before ? Dinosaurs, Atlantis,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks more like the " time machine " effect .
Anyone notice something back that was n't there before ?
Dinosaurs , Atlantis , .. ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks more like the "time machine" effect.
Anyone notice something back that wasn't there before ?
Dinosaurs, Atlantis, .. ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381214</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1259577000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are technically correct, but for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connotation" title="wikipedia.org">practical purposes</a> [wikipedia.org], the acronym UFO refers to alien craft for non-scientists and non-technical people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are technically correct , but for practical purposes [ wikipedia.org ] , the acronym UFO refers to alien craft for non-scientists and non-technical people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are technically correct, but for practical purposes [wikipedia.org], the acronym UFO refers to alien craft for non-scientists and non-technical people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30392328</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>zymano</author>
	<datestamp>1260475500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its' hoax. you morons.</p><p>it's a laser light show.</p><p>dumbasses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its ' hoax .
you morons.it 's a laser light show.dumbasses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its' hoax.
you morons.it's a laser light show.dumbasses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386958</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>dave420</author>
	<datestamp>1260452700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They do happen - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick\_Moore" title="wikipedia.org">Sir Patrick Moore</a> [wikipedia.org] is one.  Every Brit knows who he is.  He's been hosting the same TV show for 52 years, "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Sky\_at\_Night" title="wikipedia.org">The Sky at Night</a> [wikipedia.org]".</htmltext>
<tokenext>They do happen - Sir Patrick Moore [ wikipedia.org ] is one .
Every Brit knows who he is .
He 's been hosting the same TV show for 52 years , " The Sky at Night [ wikipedia.org ] " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They do happen - Sir Patrick Moore [wikipedia.org] is one.
Every Brit knows who he is.
He's been hosting the same TV show for 52 years, "The Sky at Night [wikipedia.org]".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380944</id>
	<title>Uh oh...</title>
	<author>scubamage</author>
	<datestamp>1259575860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>someone better call Gordon Freeman!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>someone better call Gordon Freeman ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>someone better call Gordon Freeman!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380774</id>
	<title>LHC......</title>
	<author>Wazz</author>
	<datestamp>1259575080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is obviously the result of the Large Hadron Corridor.....Enter the Twilight Zone Peeps!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is obviously the result of the Large Hadron Corridor.....Enter the Twilight Zone Peeps ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is obviously the result of the Large Hadron Corridor.....Enter the Twilight Zone Peeps!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383088</id>
	<title>Not convinced about the rocket story</title>
	<author>mtemmerm</author>
	<datestamp>1259586360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Several things contribute to me not going for the rocket explanation:<ul> <li>- Highly symmetrical pattern. Most if not all rocket explosions you can find footage of, show erratic patterns instead.</li><li>- Same thing happened in 2006 in Russia and another poster linked to a Chinese video of this phenomenon. These look exactly the same though different occasions.</li><li>- Why would Russia fire a missile from their (and the) largest submarine this close to Norway? It would be too dangerous this close to population especially if it's a test launch.</li><li>- On these pictures as well as the older footage, the larger spiral seems to be radiating light (not just the center or one point which could be an exhaust - the whole spiral emits light).</li></ul><p>
It's probably just me, but I smell a cover up in the guise of a failed Russian missile launch<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Several things contribute to me not going for the rocket explanation : - Highly symmetrical pattern .
Most if not all rocket explosions you can find footage of , show erratic patterns instead.- Same thing happened in 2006 in Russia and another poster linked to a Chinese video of this phenomenon .
These look exactly the same though different occasions.- Why would Russia fire a missile from their ( and the ) largest submarine this close to Norway ?
It would be too dangerous this close to population especially if it 's a test launch.- On these pictures as well as the older footage , the larger spiral seems to be radiating light ( not just the center or one point which could be an exhaust - the whole spiral emits light ) .
It 's probably just me , but I smell a cover up in the guise of a failed Russian missile launch ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Several things contribute to me not going for the rocket explanation: - Highly symmetrical pattern.
Most if not all rocket explosions you can find footage of, show erratic patterns instead.- Same thing happened in 2006 in Russia and another poster linked to a Chinese video of this phenomenon.
These look exactly the same though different occasions.- Why would Russia fire a missile from their (and the) largest submarine this close to Norway?
It would be too dangerous this close to population especially if it's a test launch.- On these pictures as well as the older footage, the larger spiral seems to be radiating light (not just the center or one point which could be an exhaust - the whole spiral emits light).
It's probably just me, but I smell a cover up in the guise of a failed Russian missile launch ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380760</id>
	<title>Putin shows some muscles</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259575020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obama is soon in Oslo for the Nobel Peace Price Ceremony. Did you think Russia could just sit and watch?</p><p>Russia is well-known for creating such distress to their non-allies.</p><p>Frightened? Mission completed. End of story.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obama is soon in Oslo for the Nobel Peace Price Ceremony .
Did you think Russia could just sit and watch ? Russia is well-known for creating such distress to their non-allies.Frightened ?
Mission completed .
End of story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obama is soon in Oslo for the Nobel Peace Price Ceremony.
Did you think Russia could just sit and watch?Russia is well-known for creating such distress to their non-allies.Frightened?
Mission completed.
End of story.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380840</id>
	<title>It's the SGC blowing up a space ship</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259575380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the SGC blowing up a space ship</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the SGC blowing up a space ship</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the SGC blowing up a space ship</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382294</id>
	<title>Re:Protons are launched out of Baikonur</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259581920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you think that Kazakhstan lies to the southwest of Norway, then you either don't know where Norway lies, where Kazakhstan lies, or both.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you think that Kazakhstan lies to the southwest of Norway , then you either do n't know where Norway lies , where Kazakhstan lies , or both .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you think that Kazakhstan lies to the southwest of Norway, then you either don't know where Norway lies, where Kazakhstan lies, or both.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382692</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259584080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think this means that the missile worked as expected in its defensive capabilities.</p><p>Video related: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN1WxSITwWw&amp;feature=related</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this means that the missile worked as expected in its defensive capabilities.Video related : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = YN1WxSITwWw&amp;feature = related</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this means that the missile worked as expected in its defensive capabilities.Video related: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN1WxSITwWw&amp;feature=related</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30398272</id>
	<title>Just Physics</title>
	<author>Jeprey</author>
	<datestamp>1260464700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like a rocket plume to be sure.  Seem pretty obvious but I was once a real rocket scientist so obvious is relative.
<p>
Remember this is in Norway.  As in, a country close to the north magnetic pole of the Earth.  What geometric pattern do ions follow in a magnetic field gradient like at the poles?  A spiral or helix.  Voila!  But why two?  Two different chemical species in the exhaust with two distinct masses and two distinct ionization recombination emission colors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like a rocket plume to be sure .
Seem pretty obvious but I was once a real rocket scientist so obvious is relative .
Remember this is in Norway .
As in , a country close to the north magnetic pole of the Earth .
What geometric pattern do ions follow in a magnetic field gradient like at the poles ?
A spiral or helix .
Voila ! But why two ?
Two different chemical species in the exhaust with two distinct masses and two distinct ionization recombination emission colors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like a rocket plume to be sure.
Seem pretty obvious but I was once a real rocket scientist so obvious is relative.
Remember this is in Norway.
As in, a country close to the north magnetic pole of the Earth.
What geometric pattern do ions follow in a magnetic field gradient like at the poles?
A spiral or helix.
Voila!  But why two?
Two different chemical species in the exhaust with two distinct masses and two distinct ionization recombination emission colors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381932</id>
	<title>No UFO</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259580180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I find interesting is how different this phenomena is from UFO sightings. Also how few, if any, reporting of "UFO", but rather og a "light phenomenon".</p><p>It doesn't prove anything, but it's interesting to note most people don't jump to the UFO conclusion, just because there is some unexplained lights in the sky.<br>Of course, the die hards, hardcore UFOians, will always claim whatever they want to believe. But who listens to that anyways?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I find interesting is how different this phenomena is from UFO sightings .
Also how few , if any , reporting of " UFO " , but rather og a " light phenomenon " .It does n't prove anything , but it 's interesting to note most people do n't jump to the UFO conclusion , just because there is some unexplained lights in the sky.Of course , the die hards , hardcore UFOians , will always claim whatever they want to believe .
But who listens to that anyways ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I find interesting is how different this phenomena is from UFO sightings.
Also how few, if any, reporting of "UFO", but rather og a "light phenomenon".It doesn't prove anything, but it's interesting to note most people don't jump to the UFO conclusion, just because there is some unexplained lights in the sky.Of course, the die hards, hardcore UFOians, will always claim whatever they want to believe.
But who listens to that anyways?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30388192</id>
	<title>Re:The ol "half trick" trick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260461340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're all real.  Well that was easy!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're all real .
Well that was easy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're all real.
Well that was easy!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380418</id>
	<title>it's the LHC i say! j/k</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259573340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lol, maybe it was the LHC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lol , maybe it was the LHC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lol, maybe it was the LHC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380622</id>
	<title>LHC</title>
	<author>Zebra\_X</author>
	<datestamp>1259574360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I blame the LHC...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I blame the LHC.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I blame the LHC...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380568</id>
	<title>My bad...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do show some lenience, I didn't know how powerful I am, I will use caution from now on releasing my vastly destructive mental capacity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do show some lenience , I did n't know how powerful I am , I will use caution from now on releasing my vastly destructive mental capacity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do show some lenience, I didn't know how powerful I am, I will use caution from now on releasing my vastly destructive mental capacity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380472</id>
	<title>Oh My...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259573640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And this happens on the day the new LHC has hit record voltage????</p><p>I for one welcome our new borealis-like leaders.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And this happens on the day the new LHC has hit record voltage ? ? ?
? I for one welcome our new borealis-like leaders .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And this happens on the day the new LHC has hit record voltage???
?I for one welcome our new borealis-like leaders.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382312</id>
	<title>Good for the Doctor...</title>
	<author>Daswolfen</author>
	<datestamp>1259582040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems he has gotten the aliens to crash on another country besides the UK this holiday season...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems he has gotten the aliens to crash on another country besides the UK this holiday season.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems he has gotten the aliens to crash on another country besides the UK this holiday season...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383860</id>
	<title>Side effect of CERN's Black holes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259591280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a higgs boson.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a higgs boson .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a higgs boson.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380646</id>
	<title>Not caused from the Large Hadron Collider?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I assumed it was the start of the destruction of earth caused by the Large Hadron Collider creating a black hole which I assumed was brought to full power earlier than expected.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I assumed it was the start of the destruction of earth caused by the Large Hadron Collider creating a black hole which I assumed was brought to full power earlier than expected .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assumed it was the start of the destruction of earth caused by the Large Hadron Collider creating a black hole which I assumed was brought to full power earlier than expected.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380974</id>
	<title>A copper chloride based propellant?</title>
	<author>pkarlos\_76</author>
	<datestamp>1259575980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Im curious to know whether they are experimenting with a new copper chloride based propellant that gives off a blue flame, or another chemical that gives off a blue flame?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Im curious to know whether they are experimenting with a new copper chloride based propellant that gives off a blue flame , or another chemical that gives off a blue flame ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Im curious to know whether they are experimenting with a new copper chloride based propellant that gives off a blue flame, or another chemical that gives off a blue flame?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383138</id>
	<title>It's the Gobblers!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259586600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They've finally worked out how to get our souls!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've finally worked out how to get our souls !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've finally worked out how to get our souls!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382720</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>scumfuker</author>
	<datestamp>1259584200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>[citation needed]</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ citation needed ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[citation needed]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383286</id>
	<title>Re:Well....</title>
	<author>LoRdTAW</author>
	<datestamp>1259587500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I blame it on Vodka.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I blame it on Vodka .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I blame it on Vodka.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386318</id>
	<title>Re:Swirly Thing Alert!</title>
	<author>piphil</author>
	<datestamp>1260443940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would go to red alert, but that would mean changing the bulb...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would go to red alert , but that would mean changing the bulb.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would go to red alert, but that would mean changing the bulb...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381022</id>
	<title>informative gnnagnaa</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259576160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Impaired its empi83 in decline, private sex party</htmltext>
<tokenext>Impaired its empi83 in decline , private sex party</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Impaired its empi83 in decline, private sex party</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30385410</id>
	<title>Re:Swirly Thing Alert!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259609040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cat, is that you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cat , is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cat, is that you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384762</id>
	<title>Re:BA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259599920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here is a Norwegian site with lots of pictures. Some verify that it was a rocket as you can see the trail of smoke leaving the ground. Picture 3 is a good one.</p><p>http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/distrikt/troms\_og\_finnmark/1.6902392?index=2#image-gallery-content</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is a Norwegian site with lots of pictures .
Some verify that it was a rocket as you can see the trail of smoke leaving the ground .
Picture 3 is a good one.http : //www.nrk.no/nyheter/distrikt/troms \ _og \ _finnmark/1.6902392 ? index = 2 # image-gallery-content</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is a Norwegian site with lots of pictures.
Some verify that it was a rocket as you can see the trail of smoke leaving the ground.
Picture 3 is a good one.http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/distrikt/troms\_og\_finnmark/1.6902392?index=2#image-gallery-content</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381100</id>
	<title>Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket!</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1259576460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it was an ICBM, wouldn't that ruffle some feathers?</p><p>I mean, I thought we all agreed that unless you're a very short Korean deity that you're not allowed to test these kinds of devices.</p><p>I distinctly missed the beginning of WWIII this morning, though to be fair it could have happened before my first cup of coffee.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it was an ICBM , would n't that ruffle some feathers ? I mean , I thought we all agreed that unless you 're a very short Korean deity that you 're not allowed to test these kinds of devices.I distinctly missed the beginning of WWIII this morning , though to be fair it could have happened before my first cup of coffee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it was an ICBM, wouldn't that ruffle some feathers?I mean, I thought we all agreed that unless you're a very short Korean deity that you're not allowed to test these kinds of devices.I distinctly missed the beginning of WWIII this morning, though to be fair it could have happened before my first cup of coffee.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380506</id>
	<title>This is what the other end</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259573820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>of a laser pointer looks like every time you shine it on a star.  Damn alien kids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>of a laser pointer looks like every time you shine it on a star .
Damn alien kids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of a laser pointer looks like every time you shine it on a star.
Damn alien kids.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384350</id>
	<title>failure of a SLBM</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259595840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The rumor in Russian circles is that it is a failed test of a very failing Bulava Submarine Launched ballistic missile that has been having a lot of trouble over the last ten years. with a 70\% test failure thus far.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The rumor in Russian circles is that it is a failed test of a very failing Bulava Submarine Launched ballistic missile that has been having a lot of trouble over the last ten years .
with a 70 \ % test failure thus far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The rumor in Russian circles is that it is a failed test of a very failing Bulava Submarine Launched ballistic missile that has been having a lot of trouble over the last ten years.
with a 70\% test failure thus far.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380756</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259575020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The nazis are coming back from outer space... ha ha ha</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The nazis are coming back from outer space... ha ha ha</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The nazis are coming back from outer space... ha ha ha</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384458</id>
	<title>What's the big deal?</title>
	<author>SlothDead</author>
	<datestamp>1259596680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like a normal weather balloon to me...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like a normal weather balloon to me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like a normal weather balloon to me...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383950</id>
	<title>Re:no ufos</title>
	<author>belthize</author>
	<datestamp>1259592180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have nothing to add other than that my view of humanity went up 3 points when I saw this comment marked +5 insightful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have nothing to add other than that my view of humanity went up 3 points when I saw this comment marked + 5 insightful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have nothing to add other than that my view of humanity went up 3 points when I saw this comment marked +5 insightful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380424</id>
	<title>Atlast...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259573340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are here!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are here ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are here!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380822</id>
	<title>Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket!</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1259575320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>perhaps losing a s<b>tabilizer</b>, and started to spiral.</p></div></blockquote><p>Ouch! That sounds painful.  -Tablizer</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>perhaps losing a stabilizer , and started to spiral.Ouch !
That sounds painful .
-Tablizer</tokentext>
<sentencetext>perhaps losing a stabilizer, and started to spiral.Ouch!
That sounds painful.
-Tablizer
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380742</id>
	<title>Clearly a rocket launch</title>
	<author>starglider29a</author>
	<datestamp>1259574900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://gfx.nrk.no/YOYD2X1CgNBSeaPse9LjVwT6ymkkphv7Q7x0aibAWJwg.jpg" title="gfx.nrk.no">http://gfx.nrk.no/YOYD2X1CgNBSeaPse9LjVwT6ymkkphv7Q7x0aibAWJwg.jpg</a> [gfx.nrk.no]
<br> <br>
If you've ever seen a rocket launch around sunrise or sunset, this is pretty obviously one of them. It should be a piece of cake to figure out the azimuth of this picture and deduce from where it was launched.<br> <br>
Case closed. Next...</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //gfx.nrk.no/YOYD2X1CgNBSeaPse9LjVwT6ymkkphv7Q7x0aibAWJwg.jpg [ gfx.nrk.no ] If you 've ever seen a rocket launch around sunrise or sunset , this is pretty obviously one of them .
It should be a piece of cake to figure out the azimuth of this picture and deduce from where it was launched .
Case closed .
Next.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://gfx.nrk.no/YOYD2X1CgNBSeaPse9LjVwT6ymkkphv7Q7x0aibAWJwg.jpg [gfx.nrk.no]
 
If you've ever seen a rocket launch around sunrise or sunset, this is pretty obviously one of them.
It should be a piece of cake to figure out the azimuth of this picture and deduce from where it was launched.
Case closed.
Next...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380606</id>
	<title>Zoomba</title>
	<author>Speare</author>
	<datestamp>1259574300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's just an experiment that the iRobot corp was conducting, where they cross a Roomba with one of their military devices.  Apparently this is related to Bill Gates' theories that hurricanes can be controlled with the proper application of technology.  Dean Kamen was not not available for comment on speculation that it was related to a Death Star marketing tie-in for his Luke "Skywalker" prosthetic hand project.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's just an experiment that the iRobot corp was conducting , where they cross a Roomba with one of their military devices .
Apparently this is related to Bill Gates ' theories that hurricanes can be controlled with the proper application of technology .
Dean Kamen was not not available for comment on speculation that it was related to a Death Star marketing tie-in for his Luke " Skywalker " prosthetic hand project .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's just an experiment that the iRobot corp was conducting, where they cross a Roomba with one of their military devices.
Apparently this is related to Bill Gates' theories that hurricanes can be controlled with the proper application of technology.
Dean Kamen was not not available for comment on speculation that it was related to a Death Star marketing tie-in for his Luke "Skywalker" prosthetic hand project.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381914</id>
	<title>Debian</title>
	<author>Geheimagent</author>
	<datestamp>1259580060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's the <a href="http://www.debian.org/logos/openlogo-nd-100.jpg" title="debian.org" rel="nofollow">Universal Operating System</a> [debian.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the Universal Operating System [ debian.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the Universal Operating System [debian.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384058</id>
	<title>Russian missle</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259593080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Norwegian astronomer Knut J&#248;rgen R&#248;ed &#216;degaard says it's 99.9\% safe to say that it's a rocket out of control, while some newspapers and TV channels are quoting Russian military sources, confirming that this is a failed Bulava missile launched from a nuclear submarine in the White Sea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Norwegian astronomer Knut J   rgen R   ed   degaard says it 's 99.9 \ % safe to say that it 's a rocket out of control , while some newspapers and TV channels are quoting Russian military sources , confirming that this is a failed Bulava missile launched from a nuclear submarine in the White Sea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Norwegian astronomer Knut Jørgen Røed Ødegaard says it's 99.9\% safe to say that it's a rocket out of control, while some newspapers and TV channels are quoting Russian military sources, confirming that this is a failed Bulava missile launched from a nuclear submarine in the White Sea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30388506</id>
	<title>Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket!</title>
	<author>jinxed\_one</author>
	<datestamp>1260463020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Recent article on BBC seems to confirm <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8405481.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">rocket hypothesis</a> [bbc.co.uk].  Why do people go to the UFO hypothesis so fast?</p><p>The surest sign that there is intelligent life in the universe is that they haven't come here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Recent article on BBC seems to confirm rocket hypothesis [ bbc.co.uk ] .
Why do people go to the UFO hypothesis so fast ? The surest sign that there is intelligent life in the universe is that they have n't come here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Recent article on BBC seems to confirm rocket hypothesis [bbc.co.uk].
Why do people go to the UFO hypothesis so fast?The surest sign that there is intelligent life in the universe is that they haven't come here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434</id>
	<title>BA</title>
	<author>Yert</author>
	<datestamp>1259573400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>BadAsstronomer seems to have picked up on a TV station's assertion that it was a russian ICBM test launch - it's certainly pretty, but unfortunately, not the black hole the LHC was supposed to bring us.  Bastards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>BadAsstronomer seems to have picked up on a TV station 's assertion that it was a russian ICBM test launch - it 's certainly pretty , but unfortunately , not the black hole the LHC was supposed to bring us .
Bastards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BadAsstronomer seems to have picked up on a TV station's assertion that it was a russian ICBM test launch - it's certainly pretty, but unfortunately, not the black hole the LHC was supposed to bring us.
Bastards.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381090</id>
	<title>Re:Swirly Thing Alert!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259576400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it a wibbly thing or a swirly thing, sir?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it a wibbly thing or a swirly thing , sir ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it a wibbly thing or a swirly thing, sir?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380582</id>
	<title>Protons are launched out of Baikonur</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Protonks (AFAIK) are launched out of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baikonur\_Cosmodrome" title="wikipedia.org">Baikonur Cosmodrome</a> [wikipedia.org], thousands of miles southwest of Norway.  I'm unsure how a launch in Kazakhstan would cause a light show in Norway, especially since the insertion into orbit proceeds east of the launch site.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Protonks ( AFAIK ) are launched out of Baikonur Cosmodrome [ wikipedia.org ] , thousands of miles southwest of Norway .
I 'm unsure how a launch in Kazakhstan would cause a light show in Norway , especially since the insertion into orbit proceeds east of the launch site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Protonks (AFAIK) are launched out of Baikonur Cosmodrome [wikipedia.org], thousands of miles southwest of Norway.
I'm unsure how a launch in Kazakhstan would cause a light show in Norway, especially since the insertion into orbit proceeds east of the launch site.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381454</id>
	<title>We are all doomed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259577960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hopefully this has nothing to do with the LHC tests recently.<br>Maybe a mini black hole?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully this has nothing to do with the LHC tests recently.Maybe a mini black hole ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully this has nothing to do with the LHC tests recently.Maybe a mini black hole?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380512</id>
	<title>Oh, come on...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259573820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.  Everybody knows that!<br> <br>Bill</htmltext>
<tokenext>The light you saw in the sky was not a UFO .
Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus .
Everybody knows that !
Bill</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The light you saw in the sky was not a UFO.
Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.
Everybody knows that!
Bill</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</id>
	<title>The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1259573040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>

Odin's back.  And he's pissed.  The spiral is his wide brimmed hat.  And he's finally got his favorite blue laser back from Loki.  Unfortunately he can only use it on one person per night.  Huginn and Muninn are doing surveillance right now so it's time to get those shrines up in the backyard, people!  Raise your cups of mead and abandon Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc.  The Norse were right, repent before it's too late!  Finally, a reason to worship a deity I can identify with--Loki!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Odin 's back .
And he 's pissed .
The spiral is his wide brimmed hat .
And he 's finally got his favorite blue laser back from Loki .
Unfortunately he can only use it on one person per night .
Huginn and Muninn are doing surveillance right now so it 's time to get those shrines up in the backyard , people !
Raise your cups of mead and abandon Christianity , Islam , Hinduism , etc .
The Norse were right , repent before it 's too late !
Finally , a reason to worship a deity I can identify with--Loki !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

Odin's back.
And he's pissed.
The spiral is his wide brimmed hat.
And he's finally got his favorite blue laser back from Loki.
Unfortunately he can only use it on one person per night.
Huginn and Muninn are doing surveillance right now so it's time to get those shrines up in the backyard, people!
Raise your cups of mead and abandon Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc.
The Norse were right, repent before it's too late!
Finally, a reason to worship a deity I can identify with--Loki!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380660</id>
	<title>Re:LCD Projector FTW</title>
	<author>Ian Alexander</author>
	<datestamp>1259574480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> I see no reason why the phenomenon couldn't be repeated 10+ years later with a more advanced tool.</p></div><p>Then you haven't seen the pictures of this thing, because there are no clouds on which to project an image.<br> <br> My vote's on the rocket hypothesis. It's simpler than supposing somebody managed to project an image of spirals onto an invisible screen in the sky for no discernible reason.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I see no reason why the phenomenon could n't be repeated 10 + years later with a more advanced tool.Then you have n't seen the pictures of this thing , because there are no clouds on which to project an image .
My vote 's on the rocket hypothesis .
It 's simpler than supposing somebody managed to project an image of spirals onto an invisible screen in the sky for no discernible reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I see no reason why the phenomenon couldn't be repeated 10+ years later with a more advanced tool.Then you haven't seen the pictures of this thing, because there are no clouds on which to project an image.
My vote's on the rocket hypothesis.
It's simpler than supposing somebody managed to project an image of spirals onto an invisible screen in the sky for no discernible reason.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30396252</id>
	<title>Re:The Norse Were Right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260447420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Odin's back.  And he's pissed.  The spiral is his wide brimmed hat.  And he's finally got his favorite blue laser back from Loki.  Unfortunately he can only use it on one person per night.  Huginn and Muninn are doing surveillance right now so it's time to get those shrines up in the backyard, people!  Raise your cups of mead and abandon Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc.  The Norse were right, repent before it's too late!  Finally, a reason to worship a deity I can identify with--Loki!</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>Odin's back.  And he's pissed.  The spiral is his wide brimmed hat.  And he's finally got his favorite blue laser back from Loki.  Unfortunately he can only use it on one person per night.  Huginn and Muninn are doing surveillance right now so it's time to get those shrines up in the backyard, people!  Raise your cups of mead and abandon Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc.  The Norse were right, repent before it's too late!  Finally, a reason to worship a deity I can identify with--Loki!</p></div><p>Have any of you every thought about Albert Einstein and his theories today?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Odin 's back .
And he 's pissed .
The spiral is his wide brimmed hat .
And he 's finally got his favorite blue laser back from Loki .
Unfortunately he can only use it on one person per night .
Huginn and Muninn are doing surveillance right now so it 's time to get those shrines up in the backyard , people !
Raise your cups of mead and abandon Christianity , Islam , Hinduism , etc .
The Norse were right , repent before it 's too late !
Finally , a reason to worship a deity I can identify with--Loki ! Odin 's back .
And he 's pissed .
The spiral is his wide brimmed hat .
And he 's finally got his favorite blue laser back from Loki .
Unfortunately he can only use it on one person per night .
Huginn and Muninn are doing surveillance right now so it 's time to get those shrines up in the backyard , people !
Raise your cups of mead and abandon Christianity , Islam , Hinduism , etc .
The Norse were right , repent before it 's too late !
Finally , a reason to worship a deity I can identify with--Loki ! Have any of you every thought about Albert Einstein and his theories today ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Odin's back.
And he's pissed.
The spiral is his wide brimmed hat.
And he's finally got his favorite blue laser back from Loki.
Unfortunately he can only use it on one person per night.
Huginn and Muninn are doing surveillance right now so it's time to get those shrines up in the backyard, people!
Raise your cups of mead and abandon Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc.
The Norse were right, repent before it's too late!
Finally, a reason to worship a deity I can identify with--Loki!Odin's back.
And he's pissed.
The spiral is his wide brimmed hat.
And he's finally got his favorite blue laser back from Loki.
Unfortunately he can only use it on one person per night.
Huginn and Muninn are doing surveillance right now so it's time to get those shrines up in the backyard, people!
Raise your cups of mead and abandon Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc.
The Norse were right, repent before it's too late!
Finally, a reason to worship a deity I can identify with--Loki!Have any of you every thought about Albert Einstein and his theories today?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381450</id>
	<title>Re:... just a laser light-show, friends! ...</title>
	<author>GumphMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1259577960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thanks ever-so-much much for that piece of doggerel verse<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks ever-so-much much for that piece of doggerel verse : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks ever-so-much much for that piece of doggerel verse :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380698</id>
	<title>Re:Relax people</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1259574720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aurora Borealis? At this time of the year, in this part of the country, located entirely in your internets?</p><p>Yes.</p><p>May I see it?</p><p>No.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aurora Borealis ?
At this time of the year , in this part of the country , located entirely in your internets ? Yes.May I see it ? No .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aurora Borealis?
At this time of the year, in this part of the country, located entirely in your internets?Yes.May I see it?No.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380446</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30400402</id>
	<title>The same week as the RAF closes it's UFO division</title>
	<author>evilandi</author>
	<datestamp>1260539400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a Brit, I was dissapointed that our <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/dec/04/ufo-ministry-of-defence" title="guardian.co.uk">Royal Air Force closed their UFO analysis division last week</a> [guardian.co.uk]. I wittered in social media about how the RAF UFO division was an excellent team who investigated unidentified incursions into UK airspace, assessed them for threats, and passed on reports of possible enemy action to the rest of the UK military. The RAF UFO division was never about finding aliens, it was about assessing unidentified airborne threats.</p><p>I'm now beginning to think I should have been a lot more vocal, writing to my MP instead. What if that had been a missile launch over Scotland instead of Norway?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a Brit , I was dissapointed that our Royal Air Force closed their UFO analysis division last week [ guardian.co.uk ] .
I wittered in social media about how the RAF UFO division was an excellent team who investigated unidentified incursions into UK airspace , assessed them for threats , and passed on reports of possible enemy action to the rest of the UK military .
The RAF UFO division was never about finding aliens , it was about assessing unidentified airborne threats.I 'm now beginning to think I should have been a lot more vocal , writing to my MP instead .
What if that had been a missile launch over Scotland instead of Norway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a Brit, I was dissapointed that our Royal Air Force closed their UFO analysis division last week [guardian.co.uk].
I wittered in social media about how the RAF UFO division was an excellent team who investigated unidentified incursions into UK airspace, assessed them for threats, and passed on reports of possible enemy action to the rest of the UK military.
The RAF UFO division was never about finding aliens, it was about assessing unidentified airborne threats.I'm now beginning to think I should have been a lot more vocal, writing to my MP instead.
What if that had been a missile launch over Scotland instead of Norway?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382360</id>
	<title>I see trouble on the way</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259582280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see earthquakes and lightning<br>I see bad times today</p><p>Just sayin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see earthquakes and lightningI see bad times todayJust sayin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see earthquakes and lightningI see bad times todayJust sayin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380706</id>
	<title>Please "dumb it down"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know now that "parsimonious" is actually a word. I've learned enough for today... I'll move on to the next article now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know now that " parsimonious " is actually a word .
I 've learned enough for today... I 'll move on to the next article now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know now that "parsimonious" is actually a word.
I've learned enough for today... I'll move on to the next article now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380522</id>
	<title>It's comcast testing there rocket to take out D-12</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259573880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's comcast testing there rocket to take out D-12.</p><p>As when that goes live they are in big trouble and the FCC will not let pull a VS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's comcast testing there rocket to take out D-12.As when that goes live they are in big trouble and the FCC will not let pull a VS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's comcast testing there rocket to take out D-12.As when that goes live they are in big trouble and the FCC will not let pull a VS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381418</id>
	<title>Similar sightseeing in RUSSIA in 2006</title>
	<author>chriz74</author>
	<datestamp>1259577900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGrRTdolTv4" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGrRTdolTv4</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = bGrRTdolTv4 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGrRTdolTv4 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383580</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259589420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet that somebody modified a carbon arc searchlight and played with it.  Like crop circles, this is art.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet that somebody modified a carbon arc searchlight and played with it .
Like crop circles , this is art .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet that somebody modified a carbon arc searchlight and played with it.
Like crop circles, this is art.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382902</id>
	<title>Roswell That Ends Well -like vortex??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259585280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381290</id>
	<title>Tagged: akustimeportal</title>
	<author>TyIzaeL</author>
	<datestamp>1259577300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I love you guys.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I love you guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love you guys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383696</id>
	<title>Final Countdown</title>
	<author>falken0905</author>
	<datestamp>1259590080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apparently no one here (or in Norway) has seen <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080736/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow"> The Final Countdown</a> [imdb.com].
Has anyone reported recently returning from 1941?  Is it a coincidence that this happened on Pearl Harbor Day?
Ha, I think not!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently no one here ( or in Norway ) has seen The Final Countdown [ imdb.com ] .
Has anyone reported recently returning from 1941 ?
Is it a coincidence that this happened on Pearl Harbor Day ?
Ha , I think not !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently no one here (or in Norway) has seen  The Final Countdown [imdb.com].
Has anyone reported recently returning from 1941?
Is it a coincidence that this happened on Pearl Harbor Day?
Ha, I think not!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30388004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30396252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30390228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30388506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30390458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30400060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30392328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30385388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30385918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30385410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384236
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30388192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30396940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30385400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30387346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1939214_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381322
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380606
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382316
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30388192
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381256
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382666
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381152
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381956
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381290
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380622
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380642
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381974
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382680
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380662
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380974
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30400060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380810
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30385388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380804
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380694
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383358
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380768
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384714
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30385400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381100
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384276
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30388506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380822
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380952
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383168
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380786
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381450
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30396252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382784
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30392328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30390228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381250
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30388004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383274
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30385918
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30390458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384238
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383928
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380750
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382360
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381166
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380660
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380872
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382632
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382460
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381508
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382692
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384242
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30387346
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382720
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384236
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382646
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382394
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384762
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30384062
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380638
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30385410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30396940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30381336
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383088
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30383322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30382270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1939214.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30380430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1939214.30386748
</commentlist>
</conversation>
