<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_09_1450230</id>
	<title>LHC Reaches Record Energy</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1260371220000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>toruonu writes <i>"Yesterday evening the Large Hadron Collider at CERN for the first time <a href="http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/public/EVTDISPLAY/events.html">accelerated protons in both directions of the ring</a> to 1.18 TeV. Even though the 1 TeV barrier per beam was first broken a week ago, this marks the first time that the beam was in the machine in both directions at the same time, allowing possibly for collisions at a center of mass energy of 2.36 TeV. Although the test lasted mere minutes, it was enough to have detectors record the very first events at 2.36 TeV. LHC passes Tevatron (the particle collider at Fermilab that operates at 1.96 TeV) and becomes the highest energy particle collider in the world (so far it was effectively just the highest energy storage ring...)"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>toruonu writes " Yesterday evening the Large Hadron Collider at CERN for the first time accelerated protons in both directions of the ring to 1.18 TeV .
Even though the 1 TeV barrier per beam was first broken a week ago , this marks the first time that the beam was in the machine in both directions at the same time , allowing possibly for collisions at a center of mass energy of 2.36 TeV .
Although the test lasted mere minutes , it was enough to have detectors record the very first events at 2.36 TeV .
LHC passes Tevatron ( the particle collider at Fermilab that operates at 1.96 TeV ) and becomes the highest energy particle collider in the world ( so far it was effectively just the highest energy storage ring... ) "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>toruonu writes "Yesterday evening the Large Hadron Collider at CERN for the first time accelerated protons in both directions of the ring to 1.18 TeV.
Even though the 1 TeV barrier per beam was first broken a week ago, this marks the first time that the beam was in the machine in both directions at the same time, allowing possibly for collisions at a center of mass energy of 2.36 TeV.
Although the test lasted mere minutes, it was enough to have detectors record the very first events at 2.36 TeV.
LHC passes Tevatron (the particle collider at Fermilab that operates at 1.96 TeV) and becomes the highest energy particle collider in the world (so far it was effectively just the highest energy storage ring...)"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122</id>
	<title>Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259597580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find it extremely hypocritical of so many European nations to be very gung-ho about the Copenhagen climate change conference and the associated chicanery with carbon offsets and all that crap, yet they're willing to fund and encourage excessive energy use like this.</p><p>The amount of power they used in mere minutes during this experiment could have powered millions of homes and businesses for a significantly longer period of time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find it extremely hypocritical of so many European nations to be very gung-ho about the Copenhagen climate change conference and the associated chicanery with carbon offsets and all that crap , yet they 're willing to fund and encourage excessive energy use like this.The amount of power they used in mere minutes during this experiment could have powered millions of homes and businesses for a significantly longer period of time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find it extremely hypocritical of so many European nations to be very gung-ho about the Copenhagen climate change conference and the associated chicanery with carbon offsets and all that crap, yet they're willing to fund and encourage excessive energy use like this.The amount of power they used in mere minutes during this experiment could have powered millions of homes and businesses for a significantly longer period of time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30382416</id>
	<title>A one-L-lama is a priest, and a two-L-llama...</title>
	<author>snowwrestler</author>
	<datestamp>1259582520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A one-L-lama is a priest, and a two-L-llama is a beast, but a three-L-lama is a major fire in Boston.</p><p>[say it out loud]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A one-L-lama is a priest , and a two-L-llama is a beast , but a three-L-lama is a major fire in Boston .
[ say it out loud ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A one-L-lama is a priest, and a two-L-llama is a beast, but a three-L-lama is a major fire in Boston.
[say it out loud]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377830</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>mtemmerm</author>
	<datestamp>1259601780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Images still not showing up here, not even after a refresh... Did anyone figure out in the mean time if this was a real event or not btw? It looks too perfect, which makes it stand out of the footage as something that shouldn't be there. I'm going to call hoax on this one. If its's not - all the better<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Images still not showing up here , not even after a refresh... Did anyone figure out in the mean time if this was a real event or not btw ?
It looks too perfect , which makes it stand out of the footage as something that should n't be there .
I 'm going to call hoax on this one .
If its 's not - all the better : ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Images still not showing up here, not even after a refresh... Did anyone figure out in the mean time if this was a real event or not btw?
It looks too perfect, which makes it stand out of the footage as something that shouldn't be there.
I'm going to call hoax on this one.
If its's not - all the better :).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377538</id>
	<title>Bah.</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1259599980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yesterday evening the Large Hadron Collider at CERN for the first time accelerated protons in both directions of the ring to 1.18 TeV</p></div><p>640GeV ought to be enough for anybody.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yesterday evening the Large Hadron Collider at CERN for the first time accelerated protons in both directions of the ring to 1.18 TeV640GeV ought to be enough for anybody .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yesterday evening the Large Hadron Collider at CERN for the first time accelerated protons in both directions of the ring to 1.18 TeV640GeV ought to be enough for anybody.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377446</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259599500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I still can't wrap my head around the fact that we can throw what amounts to two grains of sand from a mile apart, make them collide, and actually record the event. The monkeys on this little water-covered rock never cease to amaze me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I still ca n't wrap my head around the fact that we can throw what amounts to two grains of sand from a mile apart , make them collide , and actually record the event .
The monkeys on this little water-covered rock never cease to amaze me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still can't wrap my head around the fact that we can throw what amounts to two grains of sand from a mile apart, make them collide, and actually record the event.
The monkeys on this little water-covered rock never cease to amaze me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377184</id>
	<title>Humorbot 5.0</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1259597940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I says, "Super collider? I just met her!" And then they built the super collider. Thank you, you've been a great audience. - Humorbot 5.0</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I says , " Super collider ?
I just met her !
" And then they built the super collider .
Thank you , you 've been a great audience .
- Humorbot 5.0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I says, "Super collider?
I just met her!
" And then they built the super collider.
Thank you, you've been a great audience.
- Humorbot 5.0</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>CRCulver</author>
	<datestamp>1259598120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A greater understanding of physics may well be worth the excessive use of energy, as it may lead to better sources of energy tomorrow.</p><p>Lately I've been wondering how worthwhile attempts to e.g. stop climate change are when, if Kurzweil is right, we'll hit the Singularity in only a couple of decades and then all of humanity's environmental and technological problems may well be solved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A greater understanding of physics may well be worth the excessive use of energy , as it may lead to better sources of energy tomorrow.Lately I 've been wondering how worthwhile attempts to e.g .
stop climate change are when , if Kurzweil is right , we 'll hit the Singularity in only a couple of decades and then all of humanity 's environmental and technological problems may well be solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A greater understanding of physics may well be worth the excessive use of energy, as it may lead to better sources of energy tomorrow.Lately I've been wondering how worthwhile attempts to e.g.
stop climate change are when, if Kurzweil is right, we'll hit the Singularity in only a couple of decades and then all of humanity's environmental and technological problems may well be solved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380920</id>
	<title>Re:Still?</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1259575800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Long story short version.</p><p>Subatomic particles are basically energy fields. We suspect there is a tiny bit of matter in the very middle, but we can&rsquo;t really see it on account of its energy field. When it interacts with other subatomic particles, even this is really just an interaction of the two energy fields. It&rsquo;s like sumo wrestling in 10-foot hamster balls.</p><p>By smashing two particles together with extremely high amounts of energy, they&rsquo;re attempting to overcome the energy fields surrounding the actual matter so that they can examine the matter itself... break it, smash it, get it to actually touch other bits of matter instead of bouncing off the energy fields surrounding them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Long story short version.Subatomic particles are basically energy fields .
We suspect there is a tiny bit of matter in the very middle , but we can    t really see it on account of its energy field .
When it interacts with other subatomic particles , even this is really just an interaction of the two energy fields .
It    s like sumo wrestling in 10-foot hamster balls.By smashing two particles together with extremely high amounts of energy , they    re attempting to overcome the energy fields surrounding the actual matter so that they can examine the matter itself... break it , smash it , get it to actually touch other bits of matter instead of bouncing off the energy fields surrounding them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Long story short version.Subatomic particles are basically energy fields.
We suspect there is a tiny bit of matter in the very middle, but we can’t really see it on account of its energy field.
When it interacts with other subatomic particles, even this is really just an interaction of the two energy fields.
It’s like sumo wrestling in 10-foot hamster balls.By smashing two particles together with extremely high amounts of energy, they’re attempting to overcome the energy fields surrounding the actual matter so that they can examine the matter itself... break it, smash it, get it to actually touch other bits of matter instead of bouncing off the energy fields surrounding them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377672</id>
	<title>Re:Still?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>On the other hand, I think<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. might be overdoing it a bit regarding news on the subject.</p></div></blockquote><p>If a few years back we could have an article every time WoW gained a subscriber, or every time someone at Google farted, or some pirate got busted, I think we can have an article when a particle physics record is broken.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On the other hand , I think / .
might be overdoing it a bit regarding news on the subject.If a few years back we could have an article every time WoW gained a subscriber , or every time someone at Google farted , or some pirate got busted , I think we can have an article when a particle physics record is broken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the other hand, I think /.
might be overdoing it a bit regarding news on the subject.If a few years back we could have an article every time WoW gained a subscriber, or every time someone at Google farted, or some pirate got busted, I think we can have an article when a particle physics record is broken.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378476</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>mtemmerm</author>
	<datestamp>1259605320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apparently it's not the first time: <a href="http://topufo.com/ufosightingvideos/143-spiral-ufo-russia-2006.html" title="topufo.com" rel="nofollow">http://topufo.com/ufosightingvideos/143-spiral-ufo-russia-2006.html</a> [topufo.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently it 's not the first time : http : //topufo.com/ufosightingvideos/143-spiral-ufo-russia-2006.html [ topufo.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently it's not the first time: http://topufo.com/ufosightingvideos/143-spiral-ufo-russia-2006.html [topufo.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378606</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1259605800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Can the Singularity enlarge certain parts of the masculine anatomy too?</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can the Singularity enlarge certain parts of the masculine anatomy too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can the Singularity enlarge certain parts of the masculine anatomy too?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>dumuzi</author>
	<datestamp>1259599080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I lepton the chance to be the FIRST POST!!!!!. and got so charged up about it I got a large hadron. I am still a little fermion. fortunately no black holes were involved, Unfortunately I miss gauged and some braneless boson beat me to the first post. so I had to gluon my post here, The insensitive clod who beat me was probably from the future and came back in time just to ruin my post, I do not for one welcome this new overlord from the future, The positive side of all this negativity is that having his post on top and mine on the bottom does have a quarky strange charm to it (like a flex fuel car&rsquo;s superposition of states), At the risk of creating a messon this post (like a bird bombings and baguettes) and having it spin out of control I shall anti up. collapse my own wave function and walk myself off the Planck [through a displacement of 1,2 m (0,24 rods. or about 15 wamprats)]  before the beams cross and swine flu mutates into ebola on Dec 21st 2012,</htmltext>
<tokenext>I lepton the chance to be the FIRST POST ! ! ! ! ! .
and got so charged up about it I got a large hadron .
I am still a little fermion .
fortunately no black holes were involved , Unfortunately I miss gauged and some braneless boson beat me to the first post .
so I had to gluon my post here , The insensitive clod who beat me was probably from the future and came back in time just to ruin my post , I do not for one welcome this new overlord from the future , The positive side of all this negativity is that having his post on top and mine on the bottom does have a quarky strange charm to it ( like a flex fuel car    s superposition of states ) , At the risk of creating a messon this post ( like a bird bombings and baguettes ) and having it spin out of control I shall anti up .
collapse my own wave function and walk myself off the Planck [ through a displacement of 1,2 m ( 0,24 rods .
or about 15 wamprats ) ] before the beams cross and swine flu mutates into ebola on Dec 21st 2012,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I lepton the chance to be the FIRST POST!!!!!.
and got so charged up about it I got a large hadron.
I am still a little fermion.
fortunately no black holes were involved, Unfortunately I miss gauged and some braneless boson beat me to the first post.
so I had to gluon my post here, The insensitive clod who beat me was probably from the future and came back in time just to ruin my post, I do not for one welcome this new overlord from the future, The positive side of all this negativity is that having his post on top and mine on the bottom does have a quarky strange charm to it (like a flex fuel car’s superposition of states), At the risk of creating a messon this post (like a bird bombings and baguettes) and having it spin out of control I shall anti up.
collapse my own wave function and walk myself off the Planck [through a displacement of 1,2 m (0,24 rods.
or about 15 wamprats)]  before the beams cross and swine flu mutates into ebola on Dec 21st 2012,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378418</id>
	<title>Re:Breaking news.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259605140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have know idea what a Tibetan Buddhist holy men were doing at a zoo... shouldn't they be at a lamasery?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have know idea what a Tibetan Buddhist holy men were doing at a zoo... should n't they be at a lamasery ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have know idea what a Tibetan Buddhist holy men were doing at a zoo... shouldn't they be at a lamasery?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377374</id>
	<title>Still?</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1259599140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've been following the LHC's progress fairly closely because I find the project absolutely fascinating. On the other hand, I think<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. might be overdoing it a bit regarding news on the subject. Half the summary was devoted to explaining what exactly was different from the last posting. As all of the previous posting have explained, it will be a few months before anything truly exciting happens and years after that before the first really valuable scientific discoveries start occurring. Much of the discussion has become: "Are we there yet?" "No." "How about now?" "No." "And now?" "Still no."</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been following the LHC 's progress fairly closely because I find the project absolutely fascinating .
On the other hand , I think / .
might be overdoing it a bit regarding news on the subject .
Half the summary was devoted to explaining what exactly was different from the last posting .
As all of the previous posting have explained , it will be a few months before anything truly exciting happens and years after that before the first really valuable scientific discoveries start occurring .
Much of the discussion has become : " Are we there yet ?
" " No .
" " How about now ?
" " No .
" " And now ?
" " Still no .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been following the LHC's progress fairly closely because I find the project absolutely fascinating.
On the other hand, I think /.
might be overdoing it a bit regarding news on the subject.
Half the summary was devoted to explaining what exactly was different from the last posting.
As all of the previous posting have explained, it will be a few months before anything truly exciting happens and years after that before the first really valuable scientific discoveries start occurring.
Much of the discussion has become: "Are we there yet?
" "No.
" "How about now?
" "No.
" "And now?
" "Still no.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378404</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Akral</author>
	<datestamp>1259605020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Simply click on a link.<br>Then, when you see a "Denied referer", just Ctrl-L, Enter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Simply click on a link.Then , when you see a " Denied referer " , just Ctrl-L , Enter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Simply click on a link.Then, when you see a "Denied referer", just Ctrl-L, Enter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377388</id>
	<title>"Luke, I felt a disturbance in the force"</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1259599200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We've been warned.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've been warned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've been warned.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377404</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259599260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is factually incorrect. At peak (experiment running, all detectors running, all computers processing), the LHC will consume 180 MW of energy. This includes all the energy used to heat offices, etc... The actual experiment uses ~22MW of power. It's not "sneeze-at" power consumption, but considering an average household uses ~1kW of power, and the fact the LHC is planned on being shutdown a significant fraction of the year, the assertion that you could power "millions of homes and businesses for a significantly longer period of time" is bogus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is factually incorrect .
At peak ( experiment running , all detectors running , all computers processing ) , the LHC will consume 180 MW of energy .
This includes all the energy used to heat offices , etc... The actual experiment uses ~ 22MW of power .
It 's not " sneeze-at " power consumption , but considering an average household uses ~ 1kW of power , and the fact the LHC is planned on being shutdown a significant fraction of the year , the assertion that you could power " millions of homes and businesses for a significantly longer period of time " is bogus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is factually incorrect.
At peak (experiment running, all detectors running, all computers processing), the LHC will consume 180 MW of energy.
This includes all the energy used to heat offices, etc... The actual experiment uses ~22MW of power.
It's not "sneeze-at" power consumption, but considering an average household uses ~1kW of power, and the fact the LHC is planned on being shutdown a significant fraction of the year, the assertion that you could power "millions of homes and businesses for a significantly longer period of time" is bogus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377220</id>
	<title>Higgs</title>
	<author>toruonu</author>
	<datestamp>1259598180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The most optimistic scenario for Higgs discovery would take a few years of running. But there are plenty of other theories to test that can show their first signs already after a few months of running in physics configuration (7 TeV or 10 TeV energy that'll probably be around in January/February). Things like supersymmetry, lepton flavor violation etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The most optimistic scenario for Higgs discovery would take a few years of running .
But there are plenty of other theories to test that can show their first signs already after a few months of running in physics configuration ( 7 TeV or 10 TeV energy that 'll probably be around in January/February ) .
Things like supersymmetry , lepton flavor violation etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most optimistic scenario for Higgs discovery would take a few years of running.
But there are plenty of other theories to test that can show their first signs already after a few months of running in physics configuration (7 TeV or 10 TeV energy that'll probably be around in January/February).
Things like supersymmetry, lepton flavor violation etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377630</id>
	<title>Re:Next week on slashdot....</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1259600460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The LHC becomes the first particle accelerator to collide protons at energies twice the speed of the tevatron!</i></p><p>Please explain the Google service or iPhone tie-in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The LHC becomes the first particle accelerator to collide protons at energies twice the speed of the tevatron ! Please explain the Google service or iPhone tie-in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The LHC becomes the first particle accelerator to collide protons at energies twice the speed of the tevatron!Please explain the Google service or iPhone tie-in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377494</id>
	<title>In other news...</title>
	<author>HigH5</author>
	<datestamp>1259599740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>... LHC also broke the record for working for the longest uninterrupted time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... LHC also broke the record for working for the longest uninterrupted time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... LHC also broke the record for working for the longest uninterrupted time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379324</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1259609820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, you overwhelmed my pun gland. Gotta see a doc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , you overwhelmed my pun gland .
Got ta see a doc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, you overwhelmed my pun gland.
Gotta see a doc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377836</id>
	<title>Seems to me they played...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...with a single beam on full throttle! A few days ago i was checking the project stats (http://www.lhc-facts.ch/index.php?page=news) when the "Energy" reading on top of the black display showed &gt;7 GeV. It was for very short time. Did anybody else notice? I failed to take a screenshot of that...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...with a single beam on full throttle !
A few days ago i was checking the project stats ( http : //www.lhc-facts.ch/index.php ? page = news ) when the " Energy " reading on top of the black display showed &gt; 7 GeV .
It was for very short time .
Did anybody else notice ?
I failed to take a screenshot of that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...with a single beam on full throttle!
A few days ago i was checking the project stats (http://www.lhc-facts.ch/index.php?page=news) when the "Energy" reading on top of the black display showed &gt;7 GeV.
It was for very short time.
Did anybody else notice?
I failed to take a screenshot of that...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378332</id>
	<title>Re:Picking nits...</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259604660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can't get to 2TeV without braking the 1TeV barrier~</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't get to 2TeV without braking the 1TeV barrier ~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't get to 2TeV without braking the 1TeV barrier~</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377984</id>
	<title>Re:Higgs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>lepton flavor violation</p></div></blockquote><p>Like when the box says <a href="http://www.liptont.com/our\_products/flavored\_black\_tea/flb\_orange\_spice.aspx" title="liptont.com" rel="nofollow">Orange &amp; Spice</a> [liptont.com] but it ends up tasting like <a href="http://www.liptont.com/our\_products/flavored\_black\_tea/flb\_spiced\_chai.aspx" title="liptont.com" rel="nofollow">Chai</a> [liptont.com]?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>lepton flavor violationLike when the box says Orange &amp; Spice [ liptont.com ] but it ends up tasting like Chai [ liptont.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lepton flavor violationLike when the box says Orange &amp; Spice [liptont.com] but it ends up tasting like Chai [liptont.com]?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377322</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>DigitalPasture</author>
	<datestamp>1259598840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Start running your credit card up...  You can't take it with you!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Start running your credit card up... You ca n't take it with you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Start running your credit card up...  You can't take it with you!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378378</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259604900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is definitely for real. It was seen all over the country by thousands of people this morning. The first theory was that it was a failed Russian rocket, but this has already been denied by the Russians.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is definitely for real .
It was seen all over the country by thousands of people this morning .
The first theory was that it was a failed Russian rocket , but this has already been denied by the Russians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is definitely for real.
It was seen all over the country by thousands of people this morning.
The first theory was that it was a failed Russian rocket, but this has already been denied by the Russians.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377924</id>
	<title>Re:2.36 TeV - How much is that...</title>
	<author>Thud457</author>
	<datestamp>1259602260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>- the amount of energy required to move 2.36 Libraries of Congress through a electric field potential of 1 volt.<br>
or to move 1 Library of Congress through a electric field potential of 2.36 volts.<br>

<i>(I never realized LCs were charged particles before...)</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>- the amount of energy required to move 2.36 Libraries of Congress through a electric field potential of 1 volt .
or to move 1 Library of Congress through a electric field potential of 2.36 volts .
( I never realized LCs were charged particles before... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- the amount of energy required to move 2.36 Libraries of Congress through a electric field potential of 1 volt.
or to move 1 Library of Congress through a electric field potential of 2.36 volts.
(I never realized LCs were charged particles before...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377754</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>city</author>
	<datestamp>1259601360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes but they also "may well be solved" when 2012 hits, but I say we go ahead and research climate change <i> just in case </i> neither of those likely events take place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes but they also " may well be solved " when 2012 hits , but I say we go ahead and research climate change just in case neither of those likely events take place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes but they also "may well be solved" when 2012 hits, but I say we go ahead and research climate change  just in case  neither of those likely events take place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378110</id>
	<title>Re:Breaking news.</title>
	<author>tool462</author>
	<datestamp>1259603400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those responsible for the llama escape have been sacked.</p><p>The LHC will come back online in an entirely different style at great expense and at the last minute.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those responsible for the llama escape have been sacked.The LHC will come back online in an entirely different style at great expense and at the last minute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those responsible for the llama escape have been sacked.The LHC will come back online in an entirely different style at great expense and at the last minute.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377616</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>mea37</author>
	<datestamp>1259600340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's right, Citizen, don't worry about your problems.  Just go be a good consumer and enjoy life; everything will be taken care of for you by the Great Tin God.  As if by magic Technology will sweep in and save the day, with no need for you to change or contribute in any way.</p><p>Oh, and don't worry; mere mortals cannot dig a hole so deep that Technology can't solve it.  You can't do so much damage in the next 20 or 30 years, give or take, to face catastrophy before the coming of the Great Tin God.  Your folly certainly can't interfere with His coming - and have faith, He is coming!</p><p>Give.  Me.  A.  Break.</p><p>If not for humans striving to solve significant problems, there would be no technological advancement, and any Singularity that we might imagine coming would never be.  That's if the whole Singularity idea isn't crap to start with (of which I am not convinced).</p><p>Perhaps an aphorism will help:  Have faith, but row toward shore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's right , Citizen , do n't worry about your problems .
Just go be a good consumer and enjoy life ; everything will be taken care of for you by the Great Tin God .
As if by magic Technology will sweep in and save the day , with no need for you to change or contribute in any way.Oh , and do n't worry ; mere mortals can not dig a hole so deep that Technology ca n't solve it .
You ca n't do so much damage in the next 20 or 30 years , give or take , to face catastrophy before the coming of the Great Tin God .
Your folly certainly ca n't interfere with His coming - and have faith , He is coming ! Give .
Me. A. Break.If not for humans striving to solve significant problems , there would be no technological advancement , and any Singularity that we might imagine coming would never be .
That 's if the whole Singularity idea is n't crap to start with ( of which I am not convinced ) .Perhaps an aphorism will help : Have faith , but row toward shore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's right, Citizen, don't worry about your problems.
Just go be a good consumer and enjoy life; everything will be taken care of for you by the Great Tin God.
As if by magic Technology will sweep in and save the day, with no need for you to change or contribute in any way.Oh, and don't worry; mere mortals cannot dig a hole so deep that Technology can't solve it.
You can't do so much damage in the next 20 or 30 years, give or take, to face catastrophy before the coming of the Great Tin God.
Your folly certainly can't interfere with His coming - and have faith, He is coming!Give.
Me.  A.  Break.If not for humans striving to solve significant problems, there would be no technological advancement, and any Singularity that we might imagine coming would never be.
That's if the whole Singularity idea isn't crap to start with (of which I am not convinced).Perhaps an aphorism will help:  Have faith, but row toward shore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377590</id>
	<title>2.36 TeV - How much is that...</title>
	<author>alephnull42</author>
	<datestamp>1259600280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>in standard media units<br>
- Two female mosquitos colliding at 1.652 km/h? <a href="http://lhc-machine-outreach.web.cern.ch/lhc-machine-outreach/lhc\_glossary.htm" title="web.cern.ch" rel="nofollow">http://lhc-machine-outreach.web.cern.ch/lhc-machine-outreach/lhc\_glossary.htm</a> [web.cern.ch] <br>
- An unladen African swallow falling off a grain of sand?<br>
- The calorific value of 1 cornflake unleashed over the space of a fortnight?</htmltext>
<tokenext>in standard media units - Two female mosquitos colliding at 1.652 km/h ?
http : //lhc-machine-outreach.web.cern.ch/lhc-machine-outreach/lhc \ _glossary.htm [ web.cern.ch ] - An unladen African swallow falling off a grain of sand ?
- The calorific value of 1 cornflake unleashed over the space of a fortnight ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in standard media units
- Two female mosquitos colliding at 1.652 km/h?
http://lhc-machine-outreach.web.cern.ch/lhc-machine-outreach/lhc\_glossary.htm [web.cern.ch] 
- An unladen African swallow falling off a grain of sand?
- The calorific value of 1 cornflake unleashed over the space of a fortnight?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377840</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>crazycheetah</author>
	<datestamp>1259601840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Idk. They're saying it was probably a russian missile, but what I'm reading, the Russians are denying that...</p><p>Whatever it is... holy shit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Idk .
They 're saying it was probably a russian missile , but what I 'm reading , the Russians are denying that...Whatever it is... holy shit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Idk.
They're saying it was probably a russian missile, but what I'm reading, the Russians are denying that...Whatever it is... holy shit!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30392542</id>
	<title>Re:Still?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260476340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One wrong does not make the other wrong right. You fail at logic. Please hand in your geek card and refrain from programming prolog. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One wrong does not make the other wrong right .
You fail at logic .
Please hand in your geek card and refrain from programming prolog .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One wrong does not make the other wrong right.
You fail at logic.
Please hand in your geek card and refrain from programming prolog.
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378088</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259603280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow.  I'll get my crowbar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
I 'll get my crowbar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
I'll get my crowbar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380672</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption numbers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Population of Europe is abour 830 million, by the way, so LHC represents approximately zero percent of the energy consumption of Europe (to two significant figures).</i></p><p>Being pedantic, "significant figures" are from the first non-zero digit in a number, so 0.003045 to three significant figures is 0.00305. So you can't get zero percent when rounding to significant figures, what you mean is just good old rounding, rounding 0.003045 to three figures gives 0.00.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Population of Europe is abour 830 million , by the way , so LHC represents approximately zero percent of the energy consumption of Europe ( to two significant figures ) .Being pedantic , " significant figures " are from the first non-zero digit in a number , so 0.003045 to three significant figures is 0.00305 .
So you ca n't get zero percent when rounding to significant figures , what you mean is just good old rounding , rounding 0.003045 to three figures gives 0.00. ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Population of Europe is abour 830 million, by the way, so LHC represents approximately zero percent of the energy consumption of Europe (to two significant figures).Being pedantic, "significant figures" are from the first non-zero digit in a number, so 0.003045 to three significant figures is 0.00305.
So you can't get zero percent when rounding to significant figures, what you mean is just good old rounding, rounding 0.003045 to three figures gives 0.00. ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379200</id>
	<title>Re:Higgs</title>
	<author>frogjimmy</author>
	<datestamp>1259609100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Damn, I thought you were talking about a very wrong variety of tea at the end...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn , I thought you were talking about a very wrong variety of tea at the end.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn, I thought you were talking about a very wrong variety of tea at the end...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380548</id>
	<title>Re:2.36 TeV - How much is that...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That amount of energy sounds so harmless, until you consider the tiny tiny TINY space it's focused on to. Also consider that the energy of a man falling 3 feet to the ground out of bed is all that's present in a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.45 ACP round perfectly capable of killing a man. The realization of what focusing a seemingly harmless amount of energy on a small area can do is pretty amazing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That amount of energy sounds so harmless , until you consider the tiny tiny TINY space it 's focused on to .
Also consider that the energy of a man falling 3 feet to the ground out of bed is all that 's present in a .45 ACP round perfectly capable of killing a man .
The realization of what focusing a seemingly harmless amount of energy on a small area can do is pretty amazing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That amount of energy sounds so harmless, until you consider the tiny tiny TINY space it's focused on to.
Also consider that the energy of a man falling 3 feet to the ground out of bed is all that's present in a .45 ACP round perfectly capable of killing a man.
The realization of what focusing a seemingly harmless amount of energy on a small area can do is pretty amazing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377850</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Rigrig</author>
	<datestamp>1259601840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about you click the link, get the error image, then press enter in the address bar?<br>Works for me (firefox 3.5)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about you click the link , get the error image , then press enter in the address bar ? Works for me ( firefox 3.5 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about you click the link, get the error image, then press enter in the address bar?Works for me (firefox 3.5)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30386924</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>Patrik\_AKA\_RedX</author>
	<datestamp>1260452340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kurzweil speculates that if computer development keeps following Moores law, we'll have sufficiently fast computers to simulated an entire human brain in a few decades. This is pretty much a brute force methode to get an AI. No need for AI-researchers, just a fast computer, extremely accurated brain scanner and a good programmer with experience in simulation software.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kurzweil speculates that if computer development keeps following Moores law , we 'll have sufficiently fast computers to simulated an entire human brain in a few decades .
This is pretty much a brute force methode to get an AI .
No need for AI-researchers , just a fast computer , extremely accurated brain scanner and a good programmer with experience in simulation software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kurzweil speculates that if computer development keeps following Moores law, we'll have sufficiently fast computers to simulated an entire human brain in a few decades.
This is pretty much a brute force methode to get an AI.
No need for AI-researchers, just a fast computer, extremely accurated brain scanner and a good programmer with experience in simulation software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30385148</id>
	<title>CERN=we have to beat the Americans</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259604540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look the Americans are down, kick them hard and make them feel guilty because we buy our own products and they don't...</p><p>F.U. europe!!!!    you need to start inventing and spending yourselves into bankruptcy in research and development so we can leach off of you now..</p><p>bastards!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look the Americans are down , kick them hard and make them feel guilty because we buy our own products and they do n't...F.U .
europe ! ! ! ! you need to start inventing and spending yourselves into bankruptcy in research and development so we can leach off of you now..bastards ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look the Americans are down, kick them hard and make them feel guilty because we buy our own products and they don't...F.U.
europe!!!!    you need to start inventing and spending yourselves into bankruptcy in research and development so we can leach off of you now..bastards!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30384972</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>toddestan</author>
	<datestamp>1259602560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <a href="http://img.waffleimages.com/e07e495a8589dd769b7640ac21be295f738c1c04/f8ec04b52d3ffb2558f3256fd8f11d0a.jpg" title="waffleimages.com">http://img.waffleimages.com/e07e495a8589dd769b7640ac21be295f738c1c04/f8ec04b52d3ffb2558f3256fd8f11d0a.jpg</a> [waffleimages.com]</p></div></blockquote><p>Mystery solved?<br><a href="http://scrapetv.com/News/News\%20Pages/Everyone\%20Else/images-3/death-star-firing.jpg" title="scrapetv.com">http://scrapetv.com/News/News\%20Pages/Everyone\%20Else/images-3/death-star-firing.jpg</a> [scrapetv.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //img.waffleimages.com/e07e495a8589dd769b7640ac21be295f738c1c04/f8ec04b52d3ffb2558f3256fd8f11d0a.jpg [ waffleimages.com ] Mystery solved ? http : //scrapetv.com/News/News \ % 20Pages/Everyone \ % 20Else/images-3/death-star-firing.jpg [ scrapetv.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> http://img.waffleimages.com/e07e495a8589dd769b7640ac21be295f738c1c04/f8ec04b52d3ffb2558f3256fd8f11d0a.jpg [waffleimages.com]Mystery solved?http://scrapetv.com/News/News\%20Pages/Everyone\%20Else/images-3/death-star-firing.jpg [scrapetv.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380458</id>
	<title>Re:2.36 TeV - How much is that...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259573580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Disingenuous. You're not factoring for the increased mass of the mosquitoes.</p><p>I'm not sure what the mass of the moving particle is. Could someone please do the math? Here's the pseudoalgebra:</p><p>mosquito\_collision\_energy = ( particle\_collision\_energy ) * ( mosquito\_mass / particle\_mass )</p><p>So how fast would the mosquitoes have to be moving? Oh, the mosquitoty!</p><p>I, for one, welcome our new paradoxical mosquito-rights-violating overlords.</p><p>Insensitively yours,<br>- AC</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Disingenuous .
You 're not factoring for the increased mass of the mosquitoes.I 'm not sure what the mass of the moving particle is .
Could someone please do the math ?
Here 's the pseudoalgebra : mosquito \ _collision \ _energy = ( particle \ _collision \ _energy ) * ( mosquito \ _mass / particle \ _mass ) So how fast would the mosquitoes have to be moving ?
Oh , the mosquitoty ! I , for one , welcome our new paradoxical mosquito-rights-violating overlords.Insensitively yours,- AC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disingenuous.
You're not factoring for the increased mass of the mosquitoes.I'm not sure what the mass of the moving particle is.
Could someone please do the math?
Here's the pseudoalgebra:mosquito\_collision\_energy = ( particle\_collision\_energy ) * ( mosquito\_mass / particle\_mass )So how fast would the mosquitoes have to be moving?
Oh, the mosquitoty!I, for one, welcome our new paradoxical mosquito-rights-violating overlords.Insensitively yours,- AC</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378956</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>Secshunayt</author>
	<datestamp>1259607720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If we were to adopt this attitude, the "Singularity" would never occur; it comes as a result of our own innovation and progress.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If we were to adopt this attitude , the " Singularity " would never occur ; it comes as a result of our own innovation and progress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we were to adopt this attitude, the "Singularity" would never occur; it comes as a result of our own innovation and progress.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378562</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259605620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice.  Thank you.</p><p>BTW, is the quote in the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.sig yours?  I need to know who to quote.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice .
Thank you.BTW , is the quote in the .sig yours ?
I need to know who to quote .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice.
Thank you.BTW, is the quote in the .sig yours?
I need to know who to quote.
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377712</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>ParanoiaBOTS</author>
	<datestamp>1259601120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>they've put in an anti-Slashdot referer rule on those images - was there an original article so we don't have to copy &amp; paste?</p></div><p>If you just open it, and then refresh the page it will show the image.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>they 've put in an anti-Slashdot referer rule on those images - was there an original article so we do n't have to copy &amp; paste ? If you just open it , and then refresh the page it will show the image .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they've put in an anti-Slashdot referer rule on those images - was there an original article so we don't have to copy &amp; paste?If you just open it, and then refresh the page it will show the image.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378774</id>
	<title>Re:Still?</title>
	<author>badzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1259606760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can anyone explain what this thing *actually does?* I am not an atom scientist but I still feel I ought to be excited about it. When I read yet another article explaining they cranked up another trillion volts or they might discover a new snarkle particle it just leaves me cold. So what? Is that good somehow? What is it *for?*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can anyone explain what this thing * actually does ?
* I am not an atom scientist but I still feel I ought to be excited about it .
When I read yet another article explaining they cranked up another trillion volts or they might discover a new snarkle particle it just leaves me cold .
So what ?
Is that good somehow ?
What is it * for ?
*</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can anyone explain what this thing *actually does?
* I am not an atom scientist but I still feel I ought to be excited about it.
When I read yet another article explaining they cranked up another trillion volts or they might discover a new snarkle particle it just leaves me cold.
So what?
Is that good somehow?
What is it *for?
*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30384858</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1259601240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"... and the fact the LHC is planned on being shutdown a significant fraction of the year..."</p><p><em>Planned on?</em> Or just "kinda working out that way"?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ... and the fact the LHC is planned on being shutdown a significant fraction of the year... " Planned on ?
Or just " kinda working out that way " ?
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"... and the fact the LHC is planned on being shutdown a significant fraction of the year..."Planned on?
Or just "kinda working out that way"?
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377460</id>
	<title>Re:Breaking news.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259599560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yup. I was there. They were chanting "Free Tibet" on their way to CERN installations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup .
I was there .
They were chanting " Free Tibet " on their way to CERN installations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup.
I was there.
They were chanting "Free Tibet" on their way to CERN installations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377394</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>CrimsonAvenger</author>
	<datestamp>1259599200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Lately I've been wondering how worthwhile attempts to e.g. stop climate change are when, if Kurzweil is right, we'll hit the Singularity in only a couple of decades and then all of humanity's environmental and technological problems may well be solved.</p></div></blockquote><p>It's called "minimizing downside risk".
</p><p>Which is a fancy way of saying "well, and what if the Singularity does NOT occur on schedule?"
</p><p>Personally, I don't think anyone is taking the whole "global warming" thing seriously yet - they're just posturing with another unenforceable (and largely meaningless) Treaty meant to placate the global warming lobby while otherwise doing not very much at all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lately I 've been wondering how worthwhile attempts to e.g .
stop climate change are when , if Kurzweil is right , we 'll hit the Singularity in only a couple of decades and then all of humanity 's environmental and technological problems may well be solved.It 's called " minimizing downside risk " .
Which is a fancy way of saying " well , and what if the Singularity does NOT occur on schedule ?
" Personally , I do n't think anyone is taking the whole " global warming " thing seriously yet - they 're just posturing with another unenforceable ( and largely meaningless ) Treaty meant to placate the global warming lobby while otherwise doing not very much at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lately I've been wondering how worthwhile attempts to e.g.
stop climate change are when, if Kurzweil is right, we'll hit the Singularity in only a couple of decades and then all of humanity's environmental and technological problems may well be solved.It's called "minimizing downside risk".
Which is a fancy way of saying "well, and what if the Singularity does NOT occur on schedule?
"
Personally, I don't think anyone is taking the whole "global warming" thing seriously yet - they're just posturing with another unenforceable (and largely meaningless) Treaty meant to placate the global warming lobby while otherwise doing not very much at all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378176</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259603760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fess up, you wrote that a year ago and have just been waiting for the chance to copy and paste it into a post, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fess up , you wrote that a year ago and have just been waiting for the chance to copy and paste it into a post , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fess up, you wrote that a year ago and have just been waiting for the chance to copy and paste it into a post, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377380</id>
	<title>Illuminati Alert!</title>
	<author>Wargames</author>
	<datestamp>1259599140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Someone needs to watch the back of them antimatter-collecting scientists, we don't need no pope wannabe's trying to blow up The Vatican.
<br>
.
<p>Recently enjoyed the
"Angels and Demons" movie. It had some rocket-takeoff-countdown-esq video sequences of the supposed(realistic???) powerup of CERN.  Interesting q&amp;a on antimatter at: <a href="http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/Spotlight/SpotlightAandD-en.html" title="web.cern.ch" rel="nofollow">http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/Spotlight/SpotlightAandD-en.html</a> [web.cern.ch]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone needs to watch the back of them antimatter-collecting scientists , we do n't need no pope wannabe 's trying to blow up The Vatican .
. Recently enjoyed the " Angels and Demons " movie .
It had some rocket-takeoff-countdown-esq video sequences of the supposed ( realistic ? ? ?
) powerup of CERN .
Interesting q&amp;a on antimatter at : http : //public.web.cern.ch/public/en/Spotlight/SpotlightAandD-en.html [ web.cern.ch ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone needs to watch the back of them antimatter-collecting scientists, we don't need no pope wannabe's trying to blow up The Vatican.
.
Recently enjoyed the
"Angels and Demons" movie.
It had some rocket-takeoff-countdown-esq video sequences of the supposed(realistic???
) powerup of CERN.
Interesting q&amp;a on antimatter at: http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/Spotlight/SpotlightAandD-en.html [web.cern.ch]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377722</id>
	<title>*yawn*</title>
	<author>PhasmatisApparatus</author>
	<datestamp>1259601120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wake me up when it's "over nine thousaand" teraelectronvolts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wake me up when it 's " over nine thousaand " teraelectronvolts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wake me up when it's "over nine thousaand" teraelectronvolts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377114</id>
	<title>black hole</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259597520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What? And still our earth hasn't been sucked down a black hole? Do I have to do everything myself?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
And still our earth has n't been sucked down a black hole ?
Do I have to do everything myself ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
And still our earth hasn't been sucked down a black hole?
Do I have to do everything myself?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381008</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption numbers</title>
	<author>Biogenesis</author>
	<datestamp>1259576100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To give a bit more perspective: the aluminium smelter at Tomago, just North of Newcastle, Australia, uses 900MW. Together with the smelter at Kurri Kurri (Just West of Newcastle, ~350MW) they use ~14\% of all base load capacity in NSW. So next time you're complaining about the LHC just remember that the aluminium in that can of soda came at the energy cost of ~54MJ/kg.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To give a bit more perspective : the aluminium smelter at Tomago , just North of Newcastle , Australia , uses 900MW .
Together with the smelter at Kurri Kurri ( Just West of Newcastle , ~ 350MW ) they use ~ 14 \ % of all base load capacity in NSW .
So next time you 're complaining about the LHC just remember that the aluminium in that can of soda came at the energy cost of ~ 54MJ/kg .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To give a bit more perspective: the aluminium smelter at Tomago, just North of Newcastle, Australia, uses 900MW.
Together with the smelter at Kurri Kurri (Just West of Newcastle, ~350MW) they use ~14\% of all base load capacity in NSW.
So next time you're complaining about the LHC just remember that the aluminium in that can of soda came at the energy cost of ~54MJ/kg.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377400</id>
	<title>Energy consumption numbers</title>
	<author>Geoffrey.landis</author>
	<datestamp>1259599260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The amount of power they used in mere minutes during this experiment could have powered millions of homes and businesses for a significantly longer period of time.</p></div><p>About a minute worth of googling shows that the site draws a peak load of about 180 MW when it's running, of which about 120 MW is for the LHC itself.     And it doesn't run all the time.

</p><p>Typical homes are about 2 kW or so, give or take, so that's hardly enough to power "millions of homes and businesses".

</p><p>Population of Europe is abour 830 million, by the way, so LHC represents approximately zero percent of the energy consumption of Europe (to two significant figures).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The amount of power they used in mere minutes during this experiment could have powered millions of homes and businesses for a significantly longer period of time.About a minute worth of googling shows that the site draws a peak load of about 180 MW when it 's running , of which about 120 MW is for the LHC itself .
And it does n't run all the time .
Typical homes are about 2 kW or so , give or take , so that 's hardly enough to power " millions of homes and businesses " .
Population of Europe is abour 830 million , by the way , so LHC represents approximately zero percent of the energy consumption of Europe ( to two significant figures ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The amount of power they used in mere minutes during this experiment could have powered millions of homes and businesses for a significantly longer period of time.About a minute worth of googling shows that the site draws a peak load of about 180 MW when it's running, of which about 120 MW is for the LHC itself.
And it doesn't run all the time.
Typical homes are about 2 kW or so, give or take, so that's hardly enough to power "millions of homes and businesses".
Population of Europe is abour 830 million, by the way, so LHC represents approximately zero percent of the energy consumption of Europe (to two significant figures).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</id>
	<title>Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259597580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is this related to the wormhole that opened up above Norway yesterday?<br> <br> <br>

<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1234430/Mystery-spiral-blue-light-display-hovers-Norway.html" title="dailymail.co.uk">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1234430/Mystery-spiral-blue-light-display-hovers-Norway.html</a> [dailymail.co.uk] <br>

<a href="http://angryhosting.mirror.waffleimages.com/files/92/92a406b3d33f96b6953bab7efdf4541c1f130c27.jpg" title="waffleimages.com">http://angryhosting.mirror.waffleimages.com/files/92/92a406b3d33f96b6953bab7efdf4541c1f130c27.jpg</a> [waffleimages.com] <br>

<a href="http://img.waffleimages.com/d0718b906d187ca53b2e5a919c0e50dc2bb920d2/Fenomen\_over\_Borras\_340148c.jpg" title="waffleimages.com">http://img.waffleimages.com/d0718b906d187ca53b2e5a919c0e50dc2bb920d2/Fenomen\_over\_Borras\_340148c.jpg</a> [waffleimages.com] <br>

<a href="http://img.waffleimages.com/c3c879e75fc8f28b8867e8e678300ab6550dddfb/Fenomen\_over\_Borras\_340149c.jpg" title="waffleimages.com">http://img.waffleimages.com/c3c879e75fc8f28b8867e8e678300ab6550dddfb/Fenomen\_over\_Borras\_340149c.jpg</a> [waffleimages.com] <br>

<a href="http://img.waffleimages.com/37f2e96dcb20b8b968af81799df40f72a36e73e1/1260346061961\_198.jpg" title="waffleimages.com">http://img.waffleimages.com/37f2e96dcb20b8b968af81799df40f72a36e73e1/1260346061961\_198.jpg</a> [waffleimages.com] <br>

<a href="http://www.vgtv.no/?id=27553" title="www.vgtv.no">http://www.vgtv.no/?id=27553</a> [www.vgtv.no] <br>

<a href="http://img.waffleimages.com/294526ec517df78cb7535993b41d3cc0dafa0f05/DSC00020\_340153b.jpg" title="waffleimages.com">http://img.waffleimages.com/294526ec517df78cb7535993b41d3cc0dafa0f05/DSC00020\_340153b.jpg</a> [waffleimages.com] <br>

<a href="http://img.waffleimages.com/1ff7bad9b6542532a8cdc63bf02b386f891861d0/8fb0b14e0b4c7123618a8783dc35c964.jpg" title="waffleimages.com">http://img.waffleimages.com/1ff7bad9b6542532a8cdc63bf02b386f891861d0/8fb0b14e0b4c7123618a8783dc35c964.jpg</a> [waffleimages.com] <br>

<a href="http://img.waffleimages.com/9094e12c8e6320a3238bbf7e833c3cf6e36ed3c3/Fenomen\_over\_Borras\_340147c.jpg" title="waffleimages.com">http://img.waffleimages.com/9094e12c8e6320a3238bbf7e833c3cf6e36ed3c3/Fenomen\_over\_Borras\_340147c.jpg</a> [waffleimages.com] <br>

<a href="http://img.waffleimages.com/e07e495a8589dd769b7640ac21be295f738c1c04/f8ec04b52d3ffb2558f3256fd8f11d0a.jpg" title="waffleimages.com">http://img.waffleimages.com/e07e495a8589dd769b7640ac21be295f738c1c04/f8ec04b52d3ffb2558f3256fd8f11d0a.jpg</a> [waffleimages.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this related to the wormhole that opened up above Norway yesterday ?
http : //www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1234430/Mystery-spiral-blue-light-display-hovers-Norway.html [ dailymail.co.uk ] http : //angryhosting.mirror.waffleimages.com/files/92/92a406b3d33f96b6953bab7efdf4541c1f130c27.jpg [ waffleimages.com ] http : //img.waffleimages.com/d0718b906d187ca53b2e5a919c0e50dc2bb920d2/Fenomen \ _over \ _Borras \ _340148c.jpg [ waffleimages.com ] http : //img.waffleimages.com/c3c879e75fc8f28b8867e8e678300ab6550dddfb/Fenomen \ _over \ _Borras \ _340149c.jpg [ waffleimages.com ] http : //img.waffleimages.com/37f2e96dcb20b8b968af81799df40f72a36e73e1/1260346061961 \ _198.jpg [ waffleimages.com ] http : //www.vgtv.no/ ? id = 27553 [ www.vgtv.no ] http : //img.waffleimages.com/294526ec517df78cb7535993b41d3cc0dafa0f05/DSC00020 \ _340153b.jpg [ waffleimages.com ] http : //img.waffleimages.com/1ff7bad9b6542532a8cdc63bf02b386f891861d0/8fb0b14e0b4c7123618a8783dc35c964.jpg [ waffleimages.com ] http : //img.waffleimages.com/9094e12c8e6320a3238bbf7e833c3cf6e36ed3c3/Fenomen \ _over \ _Borras \ _340147c.jpg [ waffleimages.com ] http : //img.waffleimages.com/e07e495a8589dd769b7640ac21be295f738c1c04/f8ec04b52d3ffb2558f3256fd8f11d0a.jpg [ waffleimages.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this related to the wormhole that opened up above Norway yesterday?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1234430/Mystery-spiral-blue-light-display-hovers-Norway.html [dailymail.co.uk] 

http://angryhosting.mirror.waffleimages.com/files/92/92a406b3d33f96b6953bab7efdf4541c1f130c27.jpg [waffleimages.com] 

http://img.waffleimages.com/d0718b906d187ca53b2e5a919c0e50dc2bb920d2/Fenomen\_over\_Borras\_340148c.jpg [waffleimages.com] 

http://img.waffleimages.com/c3c879e75fc8f28b8867e8e678300ab6550dddfb/Fenomen\_over\_Borras\_340149c.jpg [waffleimages.com] 

http://img.waffleimages.com/37f2e96dcb20b8b968af81799df40f72a36e73e1/1260346061961\_198.jpg [waffleimages.com] 

http://www.vgtv.no/?id=27553 [www.vgtv.no] 

http://img.waffleimages.com/294526ec517df78cb7535993b41d3cc0dafa0f05/DSC00020\_340153b.jpg [waffleimages.com] 

http://img.waffleimages.com/1ff7bad9b6542532a8cdc63bf02b386f891861d0/8fb0b14e0b4c7123618a8783dc35c964.jpg [waffleimages.com] 

http://img.waffleimages.com/9094e12c8e6320a3238bbf7e833c3cf6e36ed3c3/Fenomen\_over\_Borras\_340147c.jpg [waffleimages.com] 

http://img.waffleimages.com/e07e495a8589dd769b7640ac21be295f738c1c04/f8ec04b52d3ffb2558f3256fd8f11d0a.jpg [waffleimages.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378032</id>
	<title>please stop telling uabout every increase in .1TeV</title>
	<author>t35t0r</author>
	<datestamp>1259602920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just tell us when you find the Higgs Boson. We don't care about every<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.1 increase in TeV</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just tell us when you find the Higgs Boson .
We do n't care about every .1 increase in TeV</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just tell us when you find the Higgs Boson.
We don't care about every .1 increase in TeV</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378090</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>L3370</author>
	<datestamp>1259603280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What, no mention of chair throwing?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What , no mention of chair throwing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, no mention of chair throwing?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381124</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>pwfffff</author>
	<datestamp>1259576580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I think that the human brain may be closer to the limits of having to make those difficult inherent trade offs between accuracy and computation time than we might hope."</p><p>I'm glad you THINK, now try looking up some facts before assuming that the people who've spent their lives looking into these things weren't able to address your points:</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremermann's\_limit" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremermann's\_limit</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>"2.56 &#215; 10^47 bits per second per gram."</p><p><a href="http://www.merkle.com/brainLimits.html" title="merkle.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.merkle.com/brainLimits.html</a> [merkle.com]</p><p>"It seems reasonable to conclude that the human brain has a raw computational power between 10^13 and 10^16 operations per second."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I think that the human brain may be closer to the limits of having to make those difficult inherent trade offs between accuracy and computation time than we might hope .
" I 'm glad you THINK , now try looking up some facts before assuming that the people who 've spent their lives looking into these things were n't able to address your points : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremermann 's \ _limit [ wikipedia.org ] " 2.56   10 ^ 47 bits per second per gram .
" http : //www.merkle.com/brainLimits.html [ merkle.com ] " It seems reasonable to conclude that the human brain has a raw computational power between 10 ^ 13 and 10 ^ 16 operations per second .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I think that the human brain may be closer to the limits of having to make those difficult inherent trade offs between accuracy and computation time than we might hope.
"I'm glad you THINK, now try looking up some facts before assuming that the people who've spent their lives looking into these things weren't able to address your points:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremermann's\_limit [wikipedia.org]"2.56 × 10^47 bits per second per gram.
"http://www.merkle.com/brainLimits.html [merkle.com]"It seems reasonable to conclude that the human brain has a raw computational power between 10^13 and 10^16 operations per second.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1259599320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they've put in an anti-Slashdot referer rule on those images - was there an original article so we don't have to copy &amp; paste?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they 've put in an anti-Slashdot referer rule on those images - was there an original article so we do n't have to copy &amp; paste ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they've put in an anti-Slashdot referer rule on those images - was there an original article so we don't have to copy &amp; paste?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377572</id>
	<title>Re:Still?</title>
	<author>UU7</author>
	<datestamp>1259600160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The summary is also dead wrong<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</p><p>1.18 TeV with 2 bunches per beam for the first time.</p><p>That is the achievement. Nothing do do with the fact that they are in both directions since that was the case the last time.<br>Counter rotating beams are a regular occurrence since shortly after this phase of commissioning started.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary is also dead wrong ..1.18 TeV with 2 bunches per beam for the first time.That is the achievement .
Nothing do do with the fact that they are in both directions since that was the case the last time.Counter rotating beams are a regular occurrence since shortly after this phase of commissioning started .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary is also dead wrong ..1.18 TeV with 2 bunches per beam for the first time.That is the achievement.
Nothing do do with the fact that they are in both directions since that was the case the last time.Counter rotating beams are a regular occurrence since shortly after this phase of commissioning started.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377664</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you can tell it's 'shopped... you can tell by the pixels and I have seen a large number of 'shops in my day</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you can tell it 's 'shopped... you can tell by the pixels and I have seen a large number of 'shops in my day</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you can tell it's 'shopped... you can tell by the pixels and I have seen a large number of 'shops in my day</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377186</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259597940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... do they see the higgs bosons now?
<br> <br>
Obligatory: <a href="http://xkcd.com/401/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/401/</a> [xkcd.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>... do they see the higgs bosons now ?
Obligatory : http : //xkcd.com/401/ [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... do they see the higgs bosons now?
Obligatory: http://xkcd.com/401/ [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377980</id>
	<title>First black hole has emerged in northern Norway</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There can be no doubt about it</p><p>http://www.tv2nyhetene.no/innenriks/mystisk-lysfenomen-kan-vaere-russisk-rakett-3051472.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There can be no doubt about ithttp : //www.tv2nyhetene.no/innenriks/mystisk-lysfenomen-kan-vaere-russisk-rakett-3051472.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There can be no doubt about ithttp://www.tv2nyhetene.no/innenriks/mystisk-lysfenomen-kan-vaere-russisk-rakett-3051472.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377208</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259598120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The application potential for new science is open-ended.

Anyway. Out of my way luddite. Im first in line for a portable black hole garbage compactor on ThinkGeek.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The application potential for new science is open-ended .
Anyway. Out of my way luddite .
Im first in line for a portable black hole garbage compactor on ThinkGeek .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The application potential for new science is open-ended.
Anyway. Out of my way luddite.
Im first in line for a portable black hole garbage compactor on ThinkGeek.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378192</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259603820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ecept Kurswell is a loon that doesn't deserve the attention he is getting.<br>And singularity makes wild and unfounded assumptions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ecept Kurswell is a loon that does n't deserve the attention he is getting.And singularity makes wild and unfounded assumptions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ecept Kurswell is a loon that doesn't deserve the attention he is getting.And singularity makes wild and unfounded assumptions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377766</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not try this Firefox extension: <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/953" title="mozilla.org">RefControl</a> [mozilla.org]. You can set it to block the referer (equivalent to copying &amp; pasting the URL) or, even better, set it to the URL you're visiting, which gets around attempts to block direct links. This is, as one of the commenters put it, "One of the essential addons for Firefox. "</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not try this Firefox extension : RefControl [ mozilla.org ] .
You can set it to block the referer ( equivalent to copying &amp; pasting the URL ) or , even better , set it to the URL you 're visiting , which gets around attempts to block direct links .
This is , as one of the commenters put it , " One of the essential addons for Firefox .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not try this Firefox extension: RefControl [mozilla.org].
You can set it to block the referer (equivalent to copying &amp; pasting the URL) or, even better, set it to the URL you're visiting, which gets around attempts to block direct links.
This is, as one of the commenters put it, "One of the essential addons for Firefox.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379594</id>
	<title>Re:what's a lama?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259611320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. how much time did you spend on that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .. how much time did you spend on that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow .. how much time did you spend on that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377602</id>
	<title>what's a lama?</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1259600340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>did you mean llama?</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Llama" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Llama</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>or perhaps lamia, a child-eating female demon? that would be sexy but would certainly mess up cern</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamia\_(mythology)" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamia\_(mythology)</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>they were attacked by hawaiian trees?</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diospyros\_sandwicensis" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diospyros\_sandwicensis</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>they were attacked by a ukranian pop band?</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama\_(band)" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama\_(band)</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>ohhh, you meant tibetan religious leaders! why won't those damn buddhist fundamentalists leave science alone!</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>unfortunately, they may know lama, so they'll certainly kick your ass after knocking out cern with a tibetan white crane style kick</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama\_(martial\_art)" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama\_(martial\_art)</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>did you mean llama ? http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Llama [ wikipedia.org ] or perhaps lamia , a child-eating female demon ?
that would be sexy but would certainly mess up cernhttp : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamia \ _ ( mythology ) [ wikipedia.org ] they were attacked by hawaiian trees ? http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diospyros \ _sandwicensis [ wikipedia.org ] they were attacked by a ukranian pop band ? http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama \ _ ( band ) [ wikipedia.org ] ohhh , you meant tibetan religious leaders !
why wo n't those damn buddhist fundamentalists leave science alone ! http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama [ wikipedia.org ] unfortunately , they may know lama , so they 'll certainly kick your ass after knocking out cern with a tibetan white crane style kickhttp : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama \ _ ( martial \ _art ) [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>did you mean llama?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Llama [wikipedia.org]or perhaps lamia, a child-eating female demon?
that would be sexy but would certainly mess up cernhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamia\_(mythology) [wikipedia.org]they were attacked by hawaiian trees?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diospyros\_sandwicensis [wikipedia.org]they were attacked by a ukranian pop band?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama\_(band) [wikipedia.org]ohhh, you meant tibetan religious leaders!
why won't those damn buddhist fundamentalists leave science alone!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama [wikipedia.org]unfortunately, they may know lama, so they'll certainly kick your ass after knocking out cern with a tibetan white crane style kickhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama\_(martial\_art) [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377698</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Using renewable solar power, wind power, tidal power, geothermal power and hydroelectric power, we could easily meet all of our electricity needs for years.</p><p>Had the billions of euros poured into this LHC experiment been used to build huge solar arrays in the Sahara Desert, all of Africa and Europe would have a reliable and extremely sufficient power source.</p><p>Even after that, there'd still be money left over to build large wind and tidal turbine arrays in the North Sea, which would provide extra energy that could be exported to Asia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Using renewable solar power , wind power , tidal power , geothermal power and hydroelectric power , we could easily meet all of our electricity needs for years.Had the billions of euros poured into this LHC experiment been used to build huge solar arrays in the Sahara Desert , all of Africa and Europe would have a reliable and extremely sufficient power source.Even after that , there 'd still be money left over to build large wind and tidal turbine arrays in the North Sea , which would provide extra energy that could be exported to Asia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using renewable solar power, wind power, tidal power, geothermal power and hydroelectric power, we could easily meet all of our electricity needs for years.Had the billions of euros poured into this LHC experiment been used to build huge solar arrays in the Sahara Desert, all of Africa and Europe would have a reliable and extremely sufficient power source.Even after that, there'd still be money left over to build large wind and tidal turbine arrays in the North Sea, which would provide extra energy that could be exported to Asia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377296</id>
	<title>Re:Breaking news.</title>
	<author>bunratty</author>
	<datestamp>1259598660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbwkkXGmFrI" title="youtube.com">Look out! There are llamas!</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look out !
There are llamas !
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look out!
There are llamas!
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377452</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259599500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Okay.... FREAKED OUT!  This for real?  I'm trying to process the implications if this was an actual event, I swear to got if this is some photoshoped junk, I will flip out!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay.... FREAKED OUT !
This for real ?
I 'm trying to process the implications if this was an actual event , I swear to got if this is some photoshoped junk , I will flip out !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay.... FREAKED OUT!
This for real?
I'm trying to process the implications if this was an actual event, I swear to got if this is some photoshoped junk, I will flip out!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380878</id>
	<title>Re:Still?</title>
	<author>zildgulf</author>
	<datestamp>1259575560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Two more miles...Five more minutes.<br> <br>Repeat ad nauseum.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Two more miles...Five more minutes .
Repeat ad nauseum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two more miles...Five more minutes.
Repeat ad nauseum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378018</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>CRCulver</author>
	<datestamp>1259602860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your repetitions of "Great Tin God" are ridiculous. I said that a Singularity would solve technological and environmental problems, and that's pretty believable. I said nothing about the many other problems (moral, philosophical, existential) that humanity faces.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your repetitions of " Great Tin God " are ridiculous .
I said that a Singularity would solve technological and environmental problems , and that 's pretty believable .
I said nothing about the many other problems ( moral , philosophical , existential ) that humanity faces .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your repetitions of "Great Tin God" are ridiculous.
I said that a Singularity would solve technological and environmental problems, and that's pretty believable.
I said nothing about the many other problems (moral, philosophical, existential) that humanity faces.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377148</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259597700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Doom, I tell you.  It's coming for all of us.</p></div><p>yeah.. science has always been horrified like this over centuries.. no wonder we still live in the same timesss</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Doom , I tell you .
It 's coming for all of us.yeah.. science has always been horrified like this over centuries.. no wonder we still live in the same timesss</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doom, I tell you.
It's coming for all of us.yeah.. science has always been horrified like this over centuries.. no wonder we still live in the same timesss
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378672</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1259606160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This HAS to be a rocket misfire of some kind. The apparent geometric perfection of it makes it look like a 'shop, but the wide variety of images and the video seem to indicate otherwise... </i></p><p>What are the odds of a malfunctioning rocket creating a perfect concentric spiral with no imperfections?  Darkseid invading seems about as likely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This HAS to be a rocket misfire of some kind .
The apparent geometric perfection of it makes it look like a 'shop , but the wide variety of images and the video seem to indicate otherwise... What are the odds of a malfunctioning rocket creating a perfect concentric spiral with no imperfections ?
Darkseid invading seems about as likely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This HAS to be a rocket misfire of some kind.
The apparent geometric perfection of it makes it look like a 'shop, but the wide variety of images and the video seem to indicate otherwise... What are the odds of a malfunctioning rocket creating a perfect concentric spiral with no imperfections?
Darkseid invading seems about as likely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378324</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>NonSequor</author>
	<datestamp>1259604600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm very skeptical that there's going to be an AI singularity at all.</p><p>There are physical constraints on computation density. There's going to be an upper limit on how much computation you can do within a given volume within a given amount of time without it's own waste heat destroying it.</p><p>And just increasing the volume doesn't fix everything. Just as the ratio of surface area to volume makes very large single celled organisms less efficient, I/O is limited by the same relationship.</p><p>Furthermore, there's no evidence that an artificial genius will be any less temperamental than a human genius. The price of leaps of insight is the possibility of false inferences and even very intelligent people can find ways to continue to believe in mistaken ideas.</p><p>And I don't think you can sidestep the problems with human intelligence by just making machines that think in a different way. The problems with human intelligence result from the inherent difficulty in predicting future events based on historical data. Essentially, there are a lot of problem types which you can only ever estimate answers for and the inherent trade offs between, for example, computation time and the level of accuracy of the solution are inescapable.</p><p>I don't think that we should sell short the value of human ingenuity in general purpose problem solving. I think that the human brain may be closer to the limits of having to make those difficult inherent trade offs between accuracy and computation time than we might hope.</p><p>I will say that there is some hope for enhanced progress through machine-human integration. Our strength in general purpose computation can definitely be supplemented by the computer's more narrow skills in number crunching and communications. I know that at my job that I spend most of my day dicking around with spreadsheets and a calculator and a neural interface to those things could greatly enhance my performance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm very skeptical that there 's going to be an AI singularity at all.There are physical constraints on computation density .
There 's going to be an upper limit on how much computation you can do within a given volume within a given amount of time without it 's own waste heat destroying it.And just increasing the volume does n't fix everything .
Just as the ratio of surface area to volume makes very large single celled organisms less efficient , I/O is limited by the same relationship.Furthermore , there 's no evidence that an artificial genius will be any less temperamental than a human genius .
The price of leaps of insight is the possibility of false inferences and even very intelligent people can find ways to continue to believe in mistaken ideas.And I do n't think you can sidestep the problems with human intelligence by just making machines that think in a different way .
The problems with human intelligence result from the inherent difficulty in predicting future events based on historical data .
Essentially , there are a lot of problem types which you can only ever estimate answers for and the inherent trade offs between , for example , computation time and the level of accuracy of the solution are inescapable.I do n't think that we should sell short the value of human ingenuity in general purpose problem solving .
I think that the human brain may be closer to the limits of having to make those difficult inherent trade offs between accuracy and computation time than we might hope.I will say that there is some hope for enhanced progress through machine-human integration .
Our strength in general purpose computation can definitely be supplemented by the computer 's more narrow skills in number crunching and communications .
I know that at my job that I spend most of my day dicking around with spreadsheets and a calculator and a neural interface to those things could greatly enhance my performance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm very skeptical that there's going to be an AI singularity at all.There are physical constraints on computation density.
There's going to be an upper limit on how much computation you can do within a given volume within a given amount of time without it's own waste heat destroying it.And just increasing the volume doesn't fix everything.
Just as the ratio of surface area to volume makes very large single celled organisms less efficient, I/O is limited by the same relationship.Furthermore, there's no evidence that an artificial genius will be any less temperamental than a human genius.
The price of leaps of insight is the possibility of false inferences and even very intelligent people can find ways to continue to believe in mistaken ideas.And I don't think you can sidestep the problems with human intelligence by just making machines that think in a different way.
The problems with human intelligence result from the inherent difficulty in predicting future events based on historical data.
Essentially, there are a lot of problem types which you can only ever estimate answers for and the inherent trade offs between, for example, computation time and the level of accuracy of the solution are inescapable.I don't think that we should sell short the value of human ingenuity in general purpose problem solving.
I think that the human brain may be closer to the limits of having to make those difficult inherent trade offs between accuracy and computation time than we might hope.I will say that there is some hope for enhanced progress through machine-human integration.
Our strength in general purpose computation can definitely be supplemented by the computer's more narrow skills in number crunching and communications.
I know that at my job that I spend most of my day dicking around with spreadsheets and a calculator and a neural interface to those things could greatly enhance my performance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378310</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259604540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>over 9000 internets to you, sir!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>over 9000 internets to you , sir !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>over 9000 internets to you, sir!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377508</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259599860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nobody agrees on when the singularity is coming. We're nowhere near producing an innovative AI, let alone anything genuinely intelligent in software, so technological progress is stuck going through human systems for a while yet. I am more inclined to believe the predictions that technological advances will start coming too fast for humans to follow in centuries to come, not decades. Our job is to make sure that civilisation doesn't fall apart in a mess of overpopulation and resource shortage before then. Global warming carries with it a huge risk of reducing food supplies below that that we'll need in order to ever reach the point of singularity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody agrees on when the singularity is coming .
We 're nowhere near producing an innovative AI , let alone anything genuinely intelligent in software , so technological progress is stuck going through human systems for a while yet .
I am more inclined to believe the predictions that technological advances will start coming too fast for humans to follow in centuries to come , not decades .
Our job is to make sure that civilisation does n't fall apart in a mess of overpopulation and resource shortage before then .
Global warming carries with it a huge risk of reducing food supplies below that that we 'll need in order to ever reach the point of singularity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody agrees on when the singularity is coming.
We're nowhere near producing an innovative AI, let alone anything genuinely intelligent in software, so technological progress is stuck going through human systems for a while yet.
I am more inclined to believe the predictions that technological advances will start coming too fast for humans to follow in centuries to come, not decades.
Our job is to make sure that civilisation doesn't fall apart in a mess of overpopulation and resource shortage before then.
Global warming carries with it a huge risk of reducing food supplies below that that we'll need in order to ever reach the point of singularity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379542</id>
	<title>Summary</title>
	<author>ProfessionalCookie</author>
	<datestamp>1259611080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or to summarize, whether or not something is efficient is often simply a matter of time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or to summarize , whether or not something is efficient is often simply a matter of time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or to summarize, whether or not something is efficient is often simply a matter of time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379230</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>JesseMcDonald</author>
	<datestamp>1259609160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>BTW, is the quote in the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.sig yours? I need to know who to quote.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div><p>No, I just copied it from another comment's<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.sig. A quick search on Google suggests that the original version was:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I&rsquo;ll use regular expressions." Now they have two problems &mdash; Jamie Zawinski</p></div><p>I usually try to include a citation, but in many cases (like here) there isn't enough room in the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.sig area.</p><p>P.S. To the anonymous coward who posted "No, it was written by the man who singlehandedly fought off invading armies and built all the roads in the country": lack of government does not imply a lack of cooperation, but merely the absence of legitimized aggression. It's not like the government&mdash;being nothing more than a group of individuals itself&mdash;is more capable of these things than any other group of individuals cooperating voluntarily. Government's only advantage is that it gets an irrational free pass on actions which would otherwise be considered crimes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>BTW , is the quote in the .sig yours ?
I need to know who to quote .
: ) No , I just copied it from another comment 's .sig .
A quick search on Google suggests that the original version was : Some people , when confronted with a problem , think " I know , I    ll use regular expressions .
" Now they have two problems    Jamie ZawinskiI usually try to include a citation , but in many cases ( like here ) there is n't enough room in the .sig area.P.S .
To the anonymous coward who posted " No , it was written by the man who singlehandedly fought off invading armies and built all the roads in the country " : lack of government does not imply a lack of cooperation , but merely the absence of legitimized aggression .
It 's not like the government    being nothing more than a group of individuals itself    is more capable of these things than any other group of individuals cooperating voluntarily .
Government 's only advantage is that it gets an irrational free pass on actions which would otherwise be considered crimes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BTW, is the quote in the .sig yours?
I need to know who to quote.
:)No, I just copied it from another comment's .sig.
A quick search on Google suggests that the original version was:Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I’ll use regular expressions.
" Now they have two problems — Jamie ZawinskiI usually try to include a citation, but in many cases (like here) there isn't enough room in the .sig area.P.S.
To the anonymous coward who posted "No, it was written by the man who singlehandedly fought off invading armies and built all the roads in the country": lack of government does not imply a lack of cooperation, but merely the absence of legitimized aggression.
It's not like the government—being nothing more than a group of individuals itself—is more capable of these things than any other group of individuals cooperating voluntarily.
Government's only advantage is that it gets an irrational free pass on actions which would otherwise be considered crimes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378714</id>
	<title>barrier not the same as threshold</title>
	<author>pz</author>
	<datestamp>1259606340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The summary makes it sound like there's some immense wall that must be climed or broken in order to pass 1 TeV.  There is no barrier at 1 TeV, but rather an arbitrary threshold put there by humans because the numeric representation of that energy level has a lot of zeros in the scale we happen to use.  LHC did not pass a barrier, but a threshold.</p><p>This is science, and important science, so it's critical to get it right.  Especially so for the non-scientific public.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary makes it sound like there 's some immense wall that must be climed or broken in order to pass 1 TeV .
There is no barrier at 1 TeV , but rather an arbitrary threshold put there by humans because the numeric representation of that energy level has a lot of zeros in the scale we happen to use .
LHC did not pass a barrier , but a threshold.This is science , and important science , so it 's critical to get it right .
Especially so for the non-scientific public .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary makes it sound like there's some immense wall that must be climed or broken in order to pass 1 TeV.
There is no barrier at 1 TeV, but rather an arbitrary threshold put there by humans because the numeric representation of that energy level has a lot of zeros in the scale we happen to use.
LHC did not pass a barrier, but a threshold.This is science, and important science, so it's critical to get it right.
Especially so for the non-scientific public.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378330</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1259604660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mmmm. Anyone got mozarella and olive oil handy ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mmmm .
Anyone got mozarella and olive oil handy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mmmm.
Anyone got mozarella and olive oil handy ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378828</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259607180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It could be a laser light show - that would explain the green light and the "beam" going towards the mountain side.</p><p>The Cineplex in Mountain View, California used to have these automatic rotated spotlights. These would be visible from at least 10 miles as either vertical beams or as moving points of light in the clouds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It could be a laser light show - that would explain the green light and the " beam " going towards the mountain side.The Cineplex in Mountain View , California used to have these automatic rotated spotlights .
These would be visible from at least 10 miles as either vertical beams or as moving points of light in the clouds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could be a laser light show - that would explain the green light and the "beam" going towards the mountain side.The Cineplex in Mountain View, California used to have these automatic rotated spotlights.
These would be visible from at least 10 miles as either vertical beams or as moving points of light in the clouds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378526</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>simoncpu was here</author>
	<datestamp>1259605500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doom is so 90s.  It's Half-Life, I tell you. The Combine is coming for all of us!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Doom is so 90s .
It 's Half-Life , I tell you .
The Combine is coming for all of us !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doom is so 90s.
It's Half-Life, I tell you.
The Combine is coming for all of us!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378288</id>
	<title>Re:Higgs</title>
	<author>The\_Wilschon</author>
	<datestamp>1259604420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One year of design energy running.  At 14 TeV and design luminosity, the LHC will deliver 10/fb of data to each experiment per year.  Either CMS or ATLAS can discover the Higgs at 5 sigma across nearly the entire available mass range with 10/fb, and with much less data for many masses.  In combination (like CDF and D0 do now), it would take even less data for ATLAS and CMS to discover it together.<br>
<br>
Of course, that's assuming that commissioning goes well in the next year.  I believe the LHC is currently on schedule to come up to design specs in about a year from now.  So we should expect to see a Higgs discovery paper sometime in the 2-2.5 year timeframe (allowing time for the data to be validated and the analyses to be completed).</htmltext>
<tokenext>One year of design energy running .
At 14 TeV and design luminosity , the LHC will deliver 10/fb of data to each experiment per year .
Either CMS or ATLAS can discover the Higgs at 5 sigma across nearly the entire available mass range with 10/fb , and with much less data for many masses .
In combination ( like CDF and D0 do now ) , it would take even less data for ATLAS and CMS to discover it together .
Of course , that 's assuming that commissioning goes well in the next year .
I believe the LHC is currently on schedule to come up to design specs in about a year from now .
So we should expect to see a Higgs discovery paper sometime in the 2-2.5 year timeframe ( allowing time for the data to be validated and the analyses to be completed ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One year of design energy running.
At 14 TeV and design luminosity, the LHC will deliver 10/fb of data to each experiment per year.
Either CMS or ATLAS can discover the Higgs at 5 sigma across nearly the entire available mass range with 10/fb, and with much less data for many masses.
In combination (like CDF and D0 do now), it would take even less data for ATLAS and CMS to discover it together.
Of course, that's assuming that commissioning goes well in the next year.
I believe the LHC is currently on schedule to come up to design specs in about a year from now.
So we should expect to see a Higgs discovery paper sometime in the 2-2.5 year timeframe (allowing time for the data to be validated and the analyses to be completed).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378420</id>
	<title>No</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259605140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks shopped</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks shopped</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks shopped</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380758</id>
	<title>Round numbers are not barriers</title>
	<author>JoeBuck</author>
	<datestamp>1259575020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Even though the 1 TeV barrier per beam was first broken a week ago<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..."
<p>
Um, no.  There's nothing magic about 1 TeV.  It's not a barrier.
</p><p>
Mach 1 was a barrier, because the aerodynamics is very different for a plane flying faster than the speed of sound.  This means that new design principles had to be worked out.  But nothing magic happens when you ramp up from 0.999 TeV to 1 TeV other than the flying champagne corks.
</p><p>
Likewise, new principles (optical proximity correction and phase shift masking) had to be invented so that we can manufacture ICs whose feature size is smaller than the wavelength of light (UV actually) used to expose the masks.  That's an example of a barrier being broken.
</p><p>
But Slashdot should disallow the use of the word "barrier" just because a round performance number has been bettered. Alternatively, we can all just mock the editors every time they do it; you decide.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Even though the 1 TeV barrier per beam was first broken a week ago ... " Um , no .
There 's nothing magic about 1 TeV .
It 's not a barrier .
Mach 1 was a barrier , because the aerodynamics is very different for a plane flying faster than the speed of sound .
This means that new design principles had to be worked out .
But nothing magic happens when you ramp up from 0.999 TeV to 1 TeV other than the flying champagne corks .
Likewise , new principles ( optical proximity correction and phase shift masking ) had to be invented so that we can manufacture ICs whose feature size is smaller than the wavelength of light ( UV actually ) used to expose the masks .
That 's an example of a barrier being broken .
But Slashdot should disallow the use of the word " barrier " just because a round performance number has been bettered .
Alternatively , we can all just mock the editors every time they do it ; you decide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Even though the 1 TeV barrier per beam was first broken a week ago ..."

Um, no.
There's nothing magic about 1 TeV.
It's not a barrier.
Mach 1 was a barrier, because the aerodynamics is very different for a plane flying faster than the speed of sound.
This means that new design principles had to be worked out.
But nothing magic happens when you ramp up from 0.999 TeV to 1 TeV other than the flying champagne corks.
Likewise, new principles (optical proximity correction and phase shift masking) had to be invented so that we can manufacture ICs whose feature size is smaller than the wavelength of light (UV actually) used to expose the masks.
That's an example of a barrier being broken.
But Slashdot should disallow the use of the word "barrier" just because a round performance number has been bettered.
Alternatively, we can all just mock the editors every time they do it; you decide.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379972</id>
	<title>Webcam</title>
	<author>elmartinos</author>
	<datestamp>1259613660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Webcam from the LHC is <a href="http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html" title="cyriak.co.uk">here</a> [cyriak.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Webcam from the LHC is here [ cyriak.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Webcam from the LHC is here [cyriak.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379162</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259608860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I lepton the chance to be the FIRST POST!!!!!.</p></div><p>ok that was one of the funnies posts i've seen in a while.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I lepton the chance to be the FIRST POST ! ! ! !
! .ok that was one of the funnies posts i 've seen in a while .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I lepton the chance to be the FIRST POST!!!!
!.ok that was one of the funnies posts i've seen in a while.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378112</id>
	<title>Re:Still?</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1259603400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are smashing rocks together..... really tiny rocks.... reallllly fast. It isn't complex from that angle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are smashing rocks together..... really tiny rocks.... reallllly fast .
It is n't complex from that angle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are smashing rocks together..... really tiny rocks.... reallllly fast.
It isn't complex from that angle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378894</id>
	<title>Re:The summary is incorrect</title>
	<author>Lawrence\_Bird</author>
	<datestamp>1259607480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is also kind of meaningless when the Tevatron has still a much higher luminosity and thus total power.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is also kind of meaningless when the Tevatron has still a much higher luminosity and thus total power .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is also kind of meaningless when the Tevatron has still a much higher luminosity and thus total power.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377596</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>baKanale</author>
	<datestamp>1259600280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dr. Doom is a "he", not an "it".  Way to be rude.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dr. Doom is a " he " , not an " it " .
Way to be rude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dr. Doom is a "he", not an "it".
Way to be rude.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377618</id>
	<title>Re:Still?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I take your point, but the Large Hadron Collider is the pre-eminent technological achievement of our civilisation. It knocks the complexity of the moon landings into a cocked hat and operates at energy frequencies intended to rip the very fabric of space apart. It's the most complicated and wondrous machine ever built by our, and possibly by any species, and we're doing all this to understand the processes that govern life, the universe and everything.<br> <br>

That, my friend, is what gods do.<br> <br>

I think a little "are we there yet?" journalism is forgiveable in that context.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I take your point , but the Large Hadron Collider is the pre-eminent technological achievement of our civilisation .
It knocks the complexity of the moon landings into a cocked hat and operates at energy frequencies intended to rip the very fabric of space apart .
It 's the most complicated and wondrous machine ever built by our , and possibly by any species , and we 're doing all this to understand the processes that govern life , the universe and everything .
That , my friend , is what gods do .
I think a little " are we there yet ?
" journalism is forgiveable in that context .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I take your point, but the Large Hadron Collider is the pre-eminent technological achievement of our civilisation.
It knocks the complexity of the moon landings into a cocked hat and operates at energy frequencies intended to rip the very fabric of space apart.
It's the most complicated and wondrous machine ever built by our, and possibly by any species, and we're doing all this to understand the processes that govern life, the universe and everything.
That, my friend, is what gods do.
I think a little "are we there yet?
" journalism is forgiveable in that context.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377512</id>
	<title>Re:Still?</title>
	<author>Majestix</author>
	<datestamp>1259599860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But it keeps us occupied.  I could be spamming my users, or "breaking" a server just for something to do.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But it keeps us occupied .
I could be spamming my users , or " breaking " a server just for something to do .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it keeps us occupied.
I could be spamming my users, or "breaking" a server just for something to do.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381038</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>zildgulf</author>
	<datestamp>1259576220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The singularity is coming in 20 years.  Of course next year the singularity will still be 20 years off, just like it was in 1980, 1981, 1982, etc.<br> <br>
Quite frankly, after studying AI a long time ago, I am not surprised.  The Technology singularity seems to be a moving goal.  Today data mining techniques, search engines and data analysis/feedback systems would be considered AI back around 20 years ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The singularity is coming in 20 years .
Of course next year the singularity will still be 20 years off , just like it was in 1980 , 1981 , 1982 , etc .
Quite frankly , after studying AI a long time ago , I am not surprised .
The Technology singularity seems to be a moving goal .
Today data mining techniques , search engines and data analysis/feedback systems would be considered AI back around 20 years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The singularity is coming in 20 years.
Of course next year the singularity will still be 20 years off, just like it was in 1980, 1981, 1982, etc.
Quite frankly, after studying AI a long time ago, I am not surprised.
The Technology singularity seems to be a moving goal.
Today data mining techniques, search engines and data analysis/feedback systems would be considered AI back around 20 years ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377444</id>
	<title>OMG People ...</title>
	<author>abbynormal brain</author>
	<datestamp>1259599440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... get a life. It's Norway! It's just a Rave dance party.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... get a life .
It 's Norway !
It 's just a Rave dance party .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... get a life.
It's Norway!
It's just a Rave dance party.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30386916</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260452220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yep!</p><p>GW is the least of our troubles, thus it will be made to appear the biggest, until the shit hits the fan. Quite soon. If you missed the movie from the link below, you can still catch on Friday or look for other means to see it (I-player, youtube).</p><p>http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00pdjmk</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yep ! GW is the least of our troubles , thus it will be made to appear the biggest , until the shit hits the fan .
Quite soon .
If you missed the movie from the link below , you can still catch on Friday or look for other means to see it ( I-player , youtube ) .http : //www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00pdjmk</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yep!GW is the least of our troubles, thus it will be made to appear the biggest, until the shit hits the fan.
Quite soon.
If you missed the movie from the link below, you can still catch on Friday or look for other means to see it (I-player, youtube).http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00pdjmk</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377852</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>hvm2hvm</author>
	<datestamp>1259601900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>took me about 20seconds to copy paste and look at all of them. some times just do the thing, it's not worth it trying to find a simpler or better way of doing it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>took me about 20seconds to copy paste and look at all of them .
some times just do the thing , it 's not worth it trying to find a simpler or better way of doing it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>took me about 20seconds to copy paste and look at all of them.
some times just do the thing, it's not worth it trying to find a simpler or better way of doing it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377352</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259599080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think peak oil is a serious hindrance to the Singularity. No oil, no Singularity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think peak oil is a serious hindrance to the Singularity .
No oil , no Singularity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think peak oil is a serious hindrance to the Singularity.
No oil, no Singularity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378742</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259606580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just open it in a new tab, click on the address box, and press Enter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just open it in a new tab , click on the address box , and press Enter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just open it in a new tab, click on the address box, and press Enter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379094</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Remus Shepherd</author>
	<datestamp>1259608500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's freaky.  I'm more interested in hearing about this phenomenon than the LHC.</p><p>And you know, they *might* be related.  I don't buy any rumors about a russian rocket -- no rocket would make anything that geometrically precise and long-lived.  This looks to me like a bizarre magnetic disturbance caused a bizarre aurora.  The helical blue beam looks like a trace of a LEO plasma stream.  The large spiral would then be a magnetic mirror -- common in the polar magnetosphere, but never this bright or perfect.</p><p>Could the LHC have spat out a magnetic monopole?</p><p>I'd like to see the timing of when the LHC spun up to power and when this display occurred.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's freaky .
I 'm more interested in hearing about this phenomenon than the LHC.And you know , they * might * be related .
I do n't buy any rumors about a russian rocket -- no rocket would make anything that geometrically precise and long-lived .
This looks to me like a bizarre magnetic disturbance caused a bizarre aurora .
The helical blue beam looks like a trace of a LEO plasma stream .
The large spiral would then be a magnetic mirror -- common in the polar magnetosphere , but never this bright or perfect.Could the LHC have spat out a magnetic monopole ? I 'd like to see the timing of when the LHC spun up to power and when this display occurred .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's freaky.
I'm more interested in hearing about this phenomenon than the LHC.And you know, they *might* be related.
I don't buy any rumors about a russian rocket -- no rocket would make anything that geometrically precise and long-lived.
This looks to me like a bizarre magnetic disturbance caused a bizarre aurora.
The helical blue beam looks like a trace of a LEO plasma stream.
The large spiral would then be a magnetic mirror -- common in the polar magnetosphere, but never this bright or perfect.Could the LHC have spat out a magnetic monopole?I'd like to see the timing of when the LHC spun up to power and when this display occurred.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377228</id>
	<title>Next week on slashdot....</title>
	<author>BeardedChimp</author>
	<datestamp>1259598240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The LHC becomes the first particle accelerator to collide protons at energies twice the speed of the tevatron!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The LHC becomes the first particle accelerator to collide protons at energies twice the speed of the tevatron !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The LHC becomes the first particle accelerator to collide protons at energies twice the speed of the tevatron!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379110</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259608620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lately I've been wondering how worthwhile attempts to e.g. stop climate change are when, if the Bible is right, we'll hit Armageddon in only a couple of decades and then all of humanity's environmental and technological problems may well be moot.<br> <br>
Hey, it makes about as much sense as depending on "the Singularity"!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lately I 've been wondering how worthwhile attempts to e.g .
stop climate change are when , if the Bible is right , we 'll hit Armageddon in only a couple of decades and then all of humanity 's environmental and technological problems may well be moot .
Hey , it makes about as much sense as depending on " the Singularity " !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lately I've been wondering how worthwhile attempts to e.g.
stop climate change are when, if the Bible is right, we'll hit Armageddon in only a couple of decades and then all of humanity's environmental and technological problems may well be moot.
Hey, it makes about as much sense as depending on "the Singularity"!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379270</id>
	<title>Re:Still?</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1259609460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and further, it makes for great conspiracy AND doomsday jokes. Apollo rarely had doomsday conspiracies with it, just conspiracy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and further , it makes for great conspiracy AND doomsday jokes .
Apollo rarely had doomsday conspiracies with it , just conspiracy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and further, it makes for great conspiracy AND doomsday jokes.
Apollo rarely had doomsday conspiracies with it, just conspiracy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379120</id>
	<title>Evidence....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259608620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the LHC ends up on top of Mt.Everest covered in chocolate pudding somehow: We need to start worrying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the LHC ends up on top of Mt.Everest covered in chocolate pudding somehow : We need to start worrying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the LHC ends up on top of Mt.Everest covered in chocolate pudding somehow: We need to start worrying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378494</id>
	<title>The summary is incorrect</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259605440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On November 30 the LHC accelerated two beams in opposite directions at an energy of 1.18 TeV per beam.  What was different about last nights experiment was the LHC accelerated both beams to 1.18 TeV with 2 bunches per beam for the first time.  The November 30 event was just one bunch of protons per beam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On November 30 the LHC accelerated two beams in opposite directions at an energy of 1.18 TeV per beam .
What was different about last nights experiment was the LHC accelerated both beams to 1.18 TeV with 2 bunches per beam for the first time .
The November 30 event was just one bunch of protons per beam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On November 30 the LHC accelerated two beams in opposite directions at an energy of 1.18 TeV per beam.
What was different about last nights experiment was the LHC accelerated both beams to 1.18 TeV with 2 bunches per beam for the first time.
The November 30 event was just one bunch of protons per beam.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377396</id>
	<title>Re:Breaking news.</title>
	<author>svtdragon</author>
	<datestamp>1259599200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I knew it!  "Free Tibet" is just a front organization for the <a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2009-11/bread-loving-bird-shuts-down-lhc" title="popsci.com" rel="nofollow">Association of Avian Baguette Bombers</a> [popsci.com].  Sent from the future.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew it !
" Free Tibet " is just a front organization for the Association of Avian Baguette Bombers [ popsci.com ] .
Sent from the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew it!
"Free Tibet" is just a front organization for the Association of Avian Baguette Bombers [popsci.com].
Sent from the future.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381308</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>Thing 1</author>
	<datestamp>1259577360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(I understand the parent was a joke, and this is not directed at parent.)  It always surprises me when people drag out some book written thousands of years ago, and state with absolute belief that the things written in it not only were the case and are the case, but also explain the events that will happen in the future!</p><p>No other book that I know of purports to distort the space-time continuum in this fashion.  Well, perhaps Nostradamus, and other religious texts.</p><p>Depending on "the Singularity" is completely different; this is an understood event that is likely a few decades away, if that.  ("Understood" in the sense that we know how to get there; not in the sense that we know what the world will look like after the event happens.  It's difficult to imagine that future; one thing I know is that we'll be able to make backups, and I fully intend to play the same existential games Bill Murray's character played in Groundhog Day.  But, perhaps those games will be passe, and we'll instead play the "extract energy from other universes" games...)</p><p>And to the OP, it does make sense to conserve at this juncture because another Bush might emerge and delay the singularity another decade or more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( I understand the parent was a joke , and this is not directed at parent .
) It always surprises me when people drag out some book written thousands of years ago , and state with absolute belief that the things written in it not only were the case and are the case , but also explain the events that will happen in the future ! No other book that I know of purports to distort the space-time continuum in this fashion .
Well , perhaps Nostradamus , and other religious texts.Depending on " the Singularity " is completely different ; this is an understood event that is likely a few decades away , if that .
( " Understood " in the sense that we know how to get there ; not in the sense that we know what the world will look like after the event happens .
It 's difficult to imagine that future ; one thing I know is that we 'll be able to make backups , and I fully intend to play the same existential games Bill Murray 's character played in Groundhog Day .
But , perhaps those games will be passe , and we 'll instead play the " extract energy from other universes " games... ) And to the OP , it does make sense to conserve at this juncture because another Bush might emerge and delay the singularity another decade or more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(I understand the parent was a joke, and this is not directed at parent.
)  It always surprises me when people drag out some book written thousands of years ago, and state with absolute belief that the things written in it not only were the case and are the case, but also explain the events that will happen in the future!No other book that I know of purports to distort the space-time continuum in this fashion.
Well, perhaps Nostradamus, and other religious texts.Depending on "the Singularity" is completely different; this is an understood event that is likely a few decades away, if that.
("Understood" in the sense that we know how to get there; not in the sense that we know what the world will look like after the event happens.
It's difficult to imagine that future; one thing I know is that we'll be able to make backups, and I fully intend to play the same existential games Bill Murray's character played in Groundhog Day.
But, perhaps those games will be passe, and we'll instead play the "extract energy from other universes" games...)And to the OP, it does make sense to conserve at this juncture because another Bush might emerge and delay the singularity another decade or more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379110</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379078</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259608440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some extended googling will show this is a Russian rocket that messed up, it's happened before and been documented.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some extended googling will show this is a Russian rocket that messed up , it 's happened before and been documented .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some extended googling will show this is a Russian rocket that messed up, it's happened before and been documented.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378034</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1259602980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>;;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. should have special occasions like this where you can rate a post to +6</htmltext>
<tokenext>; ; / .
should have special occasions like this where you can rate a post to + 6</tokentext>
<sentencetext>;; /.
should have special occasions like this where you can rate a post to +6</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30382210</id>
	<title>Re:Doom Blue lights over Norway</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259581500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At last, this must be the cause of the blue lights over Norway!?<br>http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/12/09/1450230/LHC-Reaches-Record-Energy?from=rss</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At last , this must be the cause of the blue lights over Norway !
? http : //science.slashdot.org/story/09/12/09/1450230/LHC-Reaches-Record-Energy ? from = rss</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At last, this must be the cause of the blue lights over Norway!
?http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/12/09/1450230/LHC-Reaches-Record-Energy?from=rss</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377790</id>
	<title>Picking nits...</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1259601540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the 1 TeV barrier per beam was first broken a week ago</p></div><p>That is not a barrier, that is a record.</p><p>A barrier is something that provides actual resistance. The speed of sound is a barrier. The speed of light is a barrier. AFAIK, there is no barrier at 1 TeV.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the 1 TeV barrier per beam was first broken a week agoThat is not a barrier , that is a record.A barrier is something that provides actual resistance .
The speed of sound is a barrier .
The speed of light is a barrier .
AFAIK , there is no barrier at 1 TeV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the 1 TeV barrier per beam was first broken a week agoThat is not a barrier, that is a record.A barrier is something that provides actual resistance.
The speed of sound is a barrier.
The speed of light is a barrier.
AFAIK, there is no barrier at 1 TeV.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377242</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259598300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What the hell? Is this for real?</p><p>I don't know what's freakier - the idea that this is some kind of covert human activity, or that humans aren't involved in any way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What the hell ?
Is this for real ? I do n't know what 's freakier - the idea that this is some kind of covert human activity , or that humans are n't involved in any way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the hell?
Is this for real?I don't know what's freakier - the idea that this is some kind of covert human activity, or that humans aren't involved in any way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378710</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>Lord Pillage</author>
	<datestamp>1259606340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's a cacodeomon? Is that when Satan lives in your hot chocolate?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's a cacodeomon ?
Is that when Satan lives in your hot chocolate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's a cacodeomon?
Is that when Satan lives in your hot chocolate?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377858</id>
	<title>Definitely a rocket launch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://gfx.nrk.no/YOYD2X1CgNBSeaPse9LjVwT6ymkkphv7Q7x0aibAWJwg.jpg" title="gfx.nrk.no">http://gfx.nrk.no/YOYD2X1CgNBSeaPse9LjVwT6ymkkphv7Q7x0aibAWJwg.jpg</a> [gfx.nrk.no] <br> <br>

as evidenced by the trail from over the horizon. Note the wind shear... Sorry, Russia. Denial denied!</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //gfx.nrk.no/YOYD2X1CgNBSeaPse9LjVwT6ymkkphv7Q7x0aibAWJwg.jpg [ gfx.nrk.no ] as evidenced by the trail from over the horizon .
Note the wind shear... Sorry , Russia .
Denial denied !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://gfx.nrk.no/YOYD2X1CgNBSeaPse9LjVwT6ymkkphv7Q7x0aibAWJwg.jpg [gfx.nrk.no]  

as evidenced by the trail from over the horizon.
Note the wind shear... Sorry, Russia.
Denial denied!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378298</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259604480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes it's real, most photo are long exposures of the event.</p><p>Looking at some clip, it appears to me to be an rocket spiraling out of control and leaking propellant. The propellant is reflecting sun light.</p><p>I've seen similar events before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes it 's real , most photo are long exposures of the event.Looking at some clip , it appears to me to be an rocket spiraling out of control and leaking propellant .
The propellant is reflecting sun light.I 've seen similar events before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes it's real, most photo are long exposures of the event.Looking at some clip, it appears to me to be an rocket spiraling out of control and leaking propellant.
The propellant is reflecting sun light.I've seen similar events before.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377266</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1259598480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was sceptical after looking at the first link, but those images really convinced me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was sceptical after looking at the first link , but those images really convinced me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was sceptical after looking at the first link, but those images really convinced me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377344</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259599020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It could explain why yesterday night my G-1 started receiving duplicate and triplicate text messages minutes apart, all of them being time-stamped at 8:36PM...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It could explain why yesterday night my G-1 started receiving duplicate and triplicate text messages minutes apart , all of them being time-stamped at 8 : 36PM.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could explain why yesterday night my G-1 started receiving duplicate and triplicate text messages minutes apart, all of them being time-stamped at 8:36PM...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377604</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This HAS to be a rocket misfire of some kind. The apparent geometric perfection of it makes it look like a 'shop, but the wide variety of images and the video seem to indicate otherwise... Spaceweather.com is reporting on it too, with links to more articles (if you can read Norsk).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This HAS to be a rocket misfire of some kind .
The apparent geometric perfection of it makes it look like a 'shop , but the wide variety of images and the video seem to indicate otherwise... Spaceweather.com is reporting on it too , with links to more articles ( if you can read Norsk ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This HAS to be a rocket misfire of some kind.
The apparent geometric perfection of it makes it look like a 'shop, but the wide variety of images and the video seem to indicate otherwise... Spaceweather.com is reporting on it too, with links to more articles (if you can read Norsk).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377752</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>solevita</author>
	<datestamp>1259601360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>they've put in an anti-Slashdot referer rule on those images - was there an original article so we don't have to copy &amp; paste?</p></div><p>Just click the link then hit F5 when it won't load. No referrers on a refresh...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>they 've put in an anti-Slashdot referer rule on those images - was there an original article so we do n't have to copy &amp; paste ? Just click the link then hit F5 when it wo n't load .
No referrers on a refresh.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they've put in an anti-Slashdot referer rule on those images - was there an original article so we don't have to copy &amp; paste?Just click the link then hit F5 when it won't load.
No referrers on a refresh...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381232</id>
	<title>Slashdot -</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259577060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>News for nerds, actually a place for assholes to spout off. There are less than 5 comments relating to the actual event in the summary. Go somewhere else to talk shit, and preferably stay there. You are adding nothing to this discussion.<br> <br>This is the premier science experiment on the planet and you lot would rather make shit up and talk about star trek. Fucking idiots. I'm ashamed to be associated with you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>News for nerds , actually a place for assholes to spout off .
There are less than 5 comments relating to the actual event in the summary .
Go somewhere else to talk shit , and preferably stay there .
You are adding nothing to this discussion .
This is the premier science experiment on the planet and you lot would rather make shit up and talk about star trek .
Fucking idiots .
I 'm ashamed to be associated with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>News for nerds, actually a place for assholes to spout off.
There are less than 5 comments relating to the actual event in the summary.
Go somewhere else to talk shit, and preferably stay there.
You are adding nothing to this discussion.
This is the premier science experiment on the planet and you lot would rather make shit up and talk about star trek.
Fucking idiots.
I'm ashamed to be associated with you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377468</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259599620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The LHC uses <a href="http://lhc-machine-outreach.web.cern.ch/lhc-machine-outreach/faq/lhc-energy-consumption.htm" title="web.cern.ch">120MW</a> [web.cern.ch], but if you really want to slant the numbers in your favor we can go with the 180MW consumed by the entire CERN complex.</p><p>If you wanted to power millions (we'll say 2M, since that's the lowest number that can be called "millions") of homes and businesses, you could only give each one 90W.  My modest-sized, well-insulated, gas-heated, largely-flourescent-lighted house consumes roughly 1kW (1000W).</p><p>So now that we have the hyperbole out of the way, certainly LHC consumes a lot of power.  If you hadn't been greedy, you could've said "could power thousands of homes and businesses" (and left off the assertion that there was some time multiplier involved), and that's true.</p><p>However, willingness to spend energy on physics is only in conflict with wanting to conserve energy if either (1) the value of the physics fails to outweigh the value of the power consumed, or (2) there is a more energy-efficient way to do the physics.</p><p>Perhaps you think the physics isn't worth doing; those funding it disagree.  That does not make them hypocrits.</p><p>If you have a more efficient design for the LHC, I'm sure many people would love to see it.</p><p>Oh, and there's only one LHC whereas there are millions of homes, millions of vehicles, millions of offices in the world.  In other words, millions of opportunities to make incremental energy improvemnts that would cumulatively offset far more power than all of the particle accelerators in the world consume, without the need to sacrifice scientific progress (or much of anything, really).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The LHC uses 120MW [ web.cern.ch ] , but if you really want to slant the numbers in your favor we can go with the 180MW consumed by the entire CERN complex.If you wanted to power millions ( we 'll say 2M , since that 's the lowest number that can be called " millions " ) of homes and businesses , you could only give each one 90W .
My modest-sized , well-insulated , gas-heated , largely-flourescent-lighted house consumes roughly 1kW ( 1000W ) .So now that we have the hyperbole out of the way , certainly LHC consumes a lot of power .
If you had n't been greedy , you could 've said " could power thousands of homes and businesses " ( and left off the assertion that there was some time multiplier involved ) , and that 's true.However , willingness to spend energy on physics is only in conflict with wanting to conserve energy if either ( 1 ) the value of the physics fails to outweigh the value of the power consumed , or ( 2 ) there is a more energy-efficient way to do the physics.Perhaps you think the physics is n't worth doing ; those funding it disagree .
That does not make them hypocrits.If you have a more efficient design for the LHC , I 'm sure many people would love to see it.Oh , and there 's only one LHC whereas there are millions of homes , millions of vehicles , millions of offices in the world .
In other words , millions of opportunities to make incremental energy improvemnts that would cumulatively offset far more power than all of the particle accelerators in the world consume , without the need to sacrifice scientific progress ( or much of anything , really ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The LHC uses 120MW [web.cern.ch], but if you really want to slant the numbers in your favor we can go with the 180MW consumed by the entire CERN complex.If you wanted to power millions (we'll say 2M, since that's the lowest number that can be called "millions") of homes and businesses, you could only give each one 90W.
My modest-sized, well-insulated, gas-heated, largely-flourescent-lighted house consumes roughly 1kW (1000W).So now that we have the hyperbole out of the way, certainly LHC consumes a lot of power.
If you hadn't been greedy, you could've said "could power thousands of homes and businesses" (and left off the assertion that there was some time multiplier involved), and that's true.However, willingness to spend energy on physics is only in conflict with wanting to conserve energy if either (1) the value of the physics fails to outweigh the value of the power consumed, or (2) there is a more energy-efficient way to do the physics.Perhaps you think the physics isn't worth doing; those funding it disagree.
That does not make them hypocrits.If you have a more efficient design for the LHC, I'm sure many people would love to see it.Oh, and there's only one LHC whereas there are millions of homes, millions of vehicles, millions of offices in the world.
In other words, millions of opportunities to make incremental energy improvemnts that would cumulatively offset far more power than all of the particle accelerators in the world consume, without the need to sacrifice scientific progress (or much of anything, really).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378156</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259603640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't you rather be out fission?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't you rather be out fission ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't you rather be out fission?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377108</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259597520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Very good. I love the sound of dying Cacodemons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Very good .
I love the sound of dying Cacodemons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very good.
I love the sound of dying Cacodemons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30384836</id>
	<title>Re:what's a lama?</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1259600880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, and wrong. The meaning is obvious when someone says <b>the</b> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenzo\_Lamas" title="wikipedia.org">Lamas.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wrong , wrong , wrong , wrong , wrong , and wrong .
The meaning is obvious when someone says the Lamas .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, and wrong.
The meaning is obvious when someone says the Lamas.
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378326</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>The Archon V2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1259604660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Very good. I love the sound of dying Cacodemons.</p></div><p>Stop, you're making me nostalgic for my days of abusing DeHackEd horribly.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Very good .
I love the sound of dying Cacodemons.Stop , you 're making me nostalgic for my days of abusing DeHackEd horribly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very good.
I love the sound of dying Cacodemons.Stop, you're making me nostalgic for my days of abusing DeHackEd horribly.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377224</id>
	<title>Cool Displays</title>
	<author>Sponge Bath</author>
	<datestamp>1259598180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those Atlas collision displays would make an awesome computer desktop gadget if you could get timely updates from a central server. Maybe add in some sound effects like "boing-oing-oing!" on each update.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those Atlas collision displays would make an awesome computer desktop gadget if you could get timely updates from a central server .
Maybe add in some sound effects like " boing-oing-oing !
" on each update .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those Atlas collision displays would make an awesome computer desktop gadget if you could get timely updates from a central server.
Maybe add in some sound effects like "boing-oing-oing!
" on each update.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378706</id>
	<title>Math still works?</title>
	<author>Comtraya</author>
	<datestamp>1259606340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do numbers still add up like normal at relativistic speeds?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do numbers still add up like normal at relativistic speeds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do numbers still add up like normal at relativistic speeds?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377634</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>Verdatum</author>
	<datestamp>1259600520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is your boss.  Get back to work!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is your boss .
Get back to work !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is your boss.
Get back to work!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092</id>
	<title>Doom</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259597400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doom, I tell you.  It's coming for all of us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Doom , I tell you .
It 's coming for all of us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doom, I tell you.
It's coming for all of us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379232</id>
	<title>Awesome</title>
	<author>glwtta</author>
	<datestamp>1259609220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Make sure to keep us updated about every 0.2 TeV increment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Make sure to keep us updated about every 0.2 TeV increment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Make sure to keep us updated about every 0.2 TeV increment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234</id>
	<title>Breaking news.</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1259598240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A herd of Lamas have escaped a local zoo and nibbled on the Christmas lights at CERN. The short caused the cooling system to go off line and the LHC will be off line for five months.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A herd of Lamas have escaped a local zoo and nibbled on the Christmas lights at CERN .
The short caused the cooling system to go off line and the LHC will be off line for five months .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A herd of Lamas have escaped a local zoo and nibbled on the Christmas lights at CERN.
The short caused the cooling system to go off line and the LHC will be off line for five months.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30383202</id>
	<title>Re:Doom</title>
	<author>MrPhilby</author>
	<datestamp>1259587020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>sends imaginary mod points</htmltext>
<tokenext>sends imaginary mod points</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sends imaginary mod points</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378772</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption numbers</title>
	<author>Rich0</author>
	<datestamp>1259606760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>LHC represents approximately zero percent of the energy consumption of Europe (to two significant figures).</i></p><p>Uh, the numbers 0, 0.00, and 0.00000000000 do not have any significant figures.</p><p>0.00000000000000001 only has one.</p><p>Yup - we order-of-magnitude guys aren't very significant...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LHC represents approximately zero percent of the energy consumption of Europe ( to two significant figures ) .Uh , the numbers 0 , 0.00 , and 0.00000000000 do not have any significant figures.0.00000000000000001 only has one.Yup - we order-of-magnitude guys are n't very significant.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LHC represents approximately zero percent of the energy consumption of Europe (to two significant figures).Uh, the numbers 0, 0.00, and 0.00000000000 do not have any significant figures.0.00000000000000001 only has one.Yup - we order-of-magnitude guys aren't very significant...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378174</id>
	<title>Re:Is this related to this wormhole ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259603760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or just hit Enter on the address bar after you click through; that sends no referrer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or just hit Enter on the address bar after you click through ; that sends no referrer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or just hit Enter on the address bar after you click through; that sends no referrer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379564</id>
	<title>Re:please stop telling uabout every increase in .1</title>
	<author>apoc.famine</author>
	<datestamp>1259611140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To some extent I agree. However, the title of this was somewhat misleading. If you dig into it, they were only running the beam one direction at 1TeV before. This time, they're running it both ways, so there could actually be 2.36 TeV collisions. That's the important part.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To some extent I agree .
However , the title of this was somewhat misleading .
If you dig into it , they were only running the beam one direction at 1TeV before .
This time , they 're running it both ways , so there could actually be 2.36 TeV collisions .
That 's the important part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To some extent I agree.
However, the title of this was somewhat misleading.
If you dig into it, they were only running the beam one direction at 1TeV before.
This time, they're running it both ways, so there could actually be 2.36 TeV collisions.
That's the important part.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381660</id>
	<title>Re:what's a lama?</title>
	<author>MiniMike</author>
	<datestamp>1259578800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>unfortunately, they may know lama, so they'll certainly kick your ass after knocking out cern with a tibetan white crane style kick</p><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama\_(martial\_art)" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama\_(martial\_art)</a> [wikipedia.org] </p></div><p>Of course they were wearing Cowboy boots made by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony\_Lama" title="wikipedia.org">Tony Lama</a> [wikipedia.org] while kicking ass (No, I don't own any.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>unfortunately , they may know lama , so they 'll certainly kick your ass after knocking out cern with a tibetan white crane style kick http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama \ _ ( martial \ _art ) [ wikipedia.org ] Of course they were wearing Cowboy boots made by Tony Lama [ wikipedia.org ] while kicking ass ( No , I do n't own any .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>unfortunately, they may know lama, so they'll certainly kick your ass after knocking out cern with a tibetan white crane style kick http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lama\_(martial\_art) [wikipedia.org] Of course they were wearing Cowboy boots made by Tony Lama [wikipedia.org] while kicking ass (No, I don't own any.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30382670</id>
	<title>Re:Energy consumption hypocrisy.</title>
	<author>Dr. Spork</author>
	<datestamp>1259583960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, that's such a perfect post!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , that 's such a perfect post !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, that's such a perfect post!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379240</id>
	<title>Re:2.36 TeV - How much is that...</title>
	<author>Nemyst</author>
	<datestamp>1259609220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Difference being that this whole energy is applied to something with a mass in the order of 10^-27 kg and a radius of something around 10^-15 meters. Were you to apply this proportionally to a mass of one kilogram, you would have energies of 0.2 Gigajoules... Or, if all energy was kinetic, a speed of around 21,000 m/s.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Difference being that this whole energy is applied to something with a mass in the order of 10 ^ -27 kg and a radius of something around 10 ^ -15 meters .
Were you to apply this proportionally to a mass of one kilogram , you would have energies of 0.2 Gigajoules... Or , if all energy was kinetic , a speed of around 21,000 m/s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Difference being that this whole energy is applied to something with a mass in the order of 10^-27 kg and a radius of something around 10^-15 meters.
Were you to apply this proportionally to a mass of one kilogram, you would have energies of 0.2 Gigajoules... Or, if all energy was kinetic, a speed of around 21,000 m/s.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377590</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30384836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30382210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377512
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30386916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30386924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30382416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30384972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377712
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30382670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30383202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30384858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30392542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1450230_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377364
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377634
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378310
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378176
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379162
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379324
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378090
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378034
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378156
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30383202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30382210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377108
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378326
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378710
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377322
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378606
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378332
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377410
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378174
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377752
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377766
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378562
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379230
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377712
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377850
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378404
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377852
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377242
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378378
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378828
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30384972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377266
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377604
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378672
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379078
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377114
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381232
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377630
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377590
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379240
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377836
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379564
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377602
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379594
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30382416
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381660
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30384836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378418
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377672
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30392542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377618
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379270
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378774
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377512
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377186
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377400
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30380672
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381008
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377206
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377698
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378956
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378192
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377508
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381038
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30386924
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377352
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377616
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378324
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381124
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378018
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377446
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377394
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30386916
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377754
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379110
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30381308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377404
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30384858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377468
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30382670
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1450230.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30379200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30377984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1450230.30378288
</commentlist>
</conversation>
